UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 20062007

OR

For the transition period from              to              .

Commission File Number 0-14625

TECH DATA CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code): (727) 539-7429

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Common stock, par value $.0015 per share

Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated Filer  ¨    Non-accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was $2,103,605,994$1,976,725,934 based on the reported last sale price of common stock on July 29, 2005,31, 2006, which is the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant’s Proxy Statement for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 6, 2006,5, 2007, is incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.

PART I

ITEM 1.Business

Overview

Tech Data Corporation (“Tech Data,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”), ranked 110th107th of the FORTUNE 500 in 2005,2006, is a leading distributor of information technology (“IT”) products, logistics management and other value-added services worldwide. We serve more than 90,000 value-added resellers (“VARs”), direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers in more than 100 countries throughout the United States, Europe, Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East and Africa. Throughout this document we will make reference to the two primary geographic markets we serve as the Americas (including the United States, Canada, Latin America and export sales to the Caribbean) and Europe, formerly referred to as EMEA (including Europe, the Middle East and export sales to Africa).

We offer a variety of products from manufacturers and publishers such as Acer, Adobe, American Power, Apple, Asus Computer, Autodesk, Canon, Cisco Systems, Epson, Fujitsu-Siemens, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Kingston, Lexmark, Lenovo, Logitech, Microsoft, Nortel Networks, NEC, Samsung, Sony, Symantec, Toshiba, Viewsonic, and Xerox. Products are generally shipped from regionally located logistics centers the same day the orders are received.

Customers are provided with a high level of customer service through the Company’s technical support, electronic commerce tools (including on-line order entry, product integration services and electronic data interchange (“EDI”) services), customized shipping documents and flexible financing programs. While we strive to provide our customers with a full array of services, revenues generated from the direct sale of services contributed less than 10% to Tech Data’s overall net sales.

History

Tech Data was incorporated in 1974 to market data processing supplies such as tapes, disk packs, and custom and stock tab forms for mini and mainframe computers directly to end users. With the advent of microcomputer dealers, we made the transition to a wholesale distributor in 1984 by broadening our product line to include hardware products and withdrawing entirely from end-user sales. From 1989 to 1994, we expanded internationally through the acquisition of privately-held distribution companies in Canada and France.

In July 1998, we substantially enhanced our European presence with the acquisition of 83% of the voting common stock of Europe’s leading technology products distributor, Computer 2000 AG (“Computer 2000”). With a presence in significant geographic markets in Europe, the Middle East and Latin America, the purchase of Computer 2000 expanded Tech Data’s presence to 26 countries worldwide. In April 1999, all of the shares of Computer 2000 were integrated into Tech Data Germany AG and the remaining minority interests in Computer 2000 were acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2003.

In May 1999, we nearly doubled our Canadian business through the acquisition of Globelle Corporation (“Globelle”), a leading publicly-held Canadian distributor. The purchase of Globelle provided critical mass and a complementary product and geographic focus to our Canadian operations.

In March 2003, we expanded our presence in the European networking and communications market through the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Azlan Group PLC (“Azlan”) for approximately $224.4 million plus acquisition-related expenses of $2.6 million, for a total purchase price of $227.0 million.. The Azlan acquisition strengthened Tech Data’s position in Europe with respect to networking products and value-added services.

In May 2005, the Company announced a formal restructuring program to better align the EMEAEurope’s operating cost structure with the current business environment. The restructuring program was completed during the third quarter of fiscal 2007. In connection with this restructuring program, the Company has recorded and will continueincurred $54.7 million (including $30.9 million incurred in the year ended January 31, 2006) related to record chargesthe restructuring program, comprised of $38.9 million (including $18.9 million incurred in the year ended January 31, 2006) for workforce reductions and the optimization of facilities and systems. Excluding external consulting costs, total cash charges associated with the restructuring program are estimated to be$15.8 million (including $12.0 million incurred in the range of $40.0 to $50.0 million, comprised of $24.0 to $30.0 million related to workforce reductions and $16.0 to $20.0 million related to the optimization of facilities and systems. We expect initiativesyear ended January 31, 2006) for facility costs. All cash payments related to the restructuring program were funded by operating cash flows and our credit facilities. In addition, during fiscal 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred $8.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, of external consulting costs related to generate annualized savingsthe restructuring program. These consulting costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in the same range. TheConsolidated Statement of Operations. These consulting costs, along with the costs of internal personnel which were dedicated to the implementation of the restructuring program is anticipatedand other incremental costs indirectly related to be complete by the end ofrestructuring program, have partially offset the third quarter of fiscal 2007.savings from the restructuring program in Europe.

DuringIn the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, in order to dedicate strategic efforts and resources to core growth opportunities, we made the decision to sell the EMEAour European Training Business (the “Training Business”). In March 2006, we closed the sale of the Training

- 1 -

Business to a third-party (the “Purchaser”) for total cash consideration of $16.5 million, and $0.5 millionresulting in an after-tax gain of additional consideration which is contingent upon the satisfaction$3.8 million. Our results of certain post-closing conditions. The sale ofoperations for the Training Business includes net assets with a book value of approximately $7.3 million at January 31, 2006, comprised primarily of accounts receivable, property and equipment, accrued expenses and other liabilities. The resultsthe gain on the sale of the Training Business have been reclassified and presented as

“discontinued operations, net of tax” in the fiscal 2006our Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented. The assets and all prior periods presented have been restated and reported as discontinued operations. We are in the process of finalizing the closing balance sheet as of the sale date with the Purchaser, including the allocation of any EMEA goodwill, and do not anticipate the gain on the saleliabilities of the Training Business to be material tohave not been reclassified in our January 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet as the net assets of the Training Business were less than 0.5% of the total consolidated operating results or financial condition.net assets of the Company.

Industry

The wholesale distribution model has proven to be well suited for both manufacturers and publishers of IT products (also referred to throughout this document as “vendors” or “suppliers”) and resellers of those products. The large number of resellers makes it cost efficient for vendors to rely on wholesale distributors to serve this diverse customer base.

Similarly, due to the large number of vendors and products, resellers often cannot or choose not to establish direct purchasing relationships with vendors. As a result, they frequently rely on wholesale distributors, such as Tech Data, who can leverage purchasing costs across multiple vendors to satisfy a significant portion of their product procurement, logistics, financing, marketing and technical support needs.

Through collaborative supply chain management initiatives, we continue to advance the efficiency of our distribution model. By leveraging our infrastructure and logistics expertise, vendors benefit from a cost-effective alternative to selling directly to resellers. Our ability to provide a “virtual warehouse” of products for resellers means they no longer need to hold inventory, which reduces their costs and risks associated with handling products. In addition to enabling fast reseller access to a comprehensive hardware and software offering, we frequently ship products directly to end-users on behalf of our customers, thereby reducing the resellers’ costs of storing, maintaining, and shipping the products themselves. We facilitate this approach by personalizing shipping labels and packing documents with the resellers’ brand identities (e.g., logos), marketing messages and other specialized content.

The increasing utilization of electronic ordering and information delivery systems, including the ability to transact business over the internet, continues to have a significant impact on the cost efficiency of the wholesale distribution model. For example, we have established a seamless supply chain in which end-user orders flow immediately from reseller internet sites to our logistics centers in closest proximity to the order destination. Advances like these are possible due to the financial and technical resources available to large-scale distributors, such as ourselves, enabling a reduction in both our customers’ and our own transaction costs through more efficient purchasing and lower selling and delivery costs.

In summary, the IT distribution industry continues to address a broad spectrum of reseller and vendor requirements despite certain vendors such as Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”), continuing with direct sales of certain products to end-users and/or resellers. New products and emerging market opportunities have helped to offset the impact of vendor direct sales on IT distributors. Further, vendors continue to seek the logistics expertise of distributors to penetrate key markets like the small- and mid-sized business (“SMB”) sector, which rely on VARs—our primary customer base—to gain access to and support for new technology. The economies of scale and global reach of large industry-leading distributors are expected to continue to be significant competitive advantages in this marketplace.

Products and Vendors

We sell more than 100,000 products from the world’s leading peripheral, system and networking manufacturers and software publishers. These products are typically purchased directly from the manufacturer or software publisher on a non-exclusive basis. Conversely, our vendor agreements do not restrict us from selling similar products manufactured by competitors, nor do they require us to sell a specified quantity of product. As a result, we have the flexibility to terminate or curtail sales of one product line in favor of another due to technological change, pricing considerations, product availability, customer demand, or vendor distribution policies.

- 2 -

We continually strengthen our product line in order to provide our customers with access to the latest technology products. However, from time to time, the demand for certain products that we sell exceeds the supply available from the manufacturer or publisher. In such cases, we generally receive an allocation of the available products. We believe that our ability to compete is not adversely affected by these periodic shortages and the resulting allocations.

It is our understanding that our vendor agreements are in the form customarily used by each manufacturer. Agreements typically contain provisions that allow termination by either party upon 30 days notice. In most instances, a vendor who elects to terminate a distribution agreement will repurchase from the distributor the vendor’s products carried in the distributor’s inventory.

Most of our vendor agreements also allow for stock rotation and price protection provisions. Stock rotation rights give us the ability, subject to certain limitations, to return for credit or exchange a portion of those inventory items purchased from the vendor. Price protection situations occur when a vendor credits us for declines in inventory value resulting from the vendor’s price reductions. Along with our inventory management policies and practices, these provisions reduce our risk of loss due to slow-moving inventory, vendor price reductions, product updates or obsolescence.

Sometimes the industry practices discussed above are not embodied in agreements and do not protect us in all cases from declines in inventory value. However, we believe that these practices provide a significant level of protection from such declines, although no assurance can be given that such practices will continue or that they will adequately protect us against declines in inventory value (see also Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)—Asset Management).

While we sell products in various countries throughout the world, and product categories may vary from region to region, over the past three years,during fiscal 2007, sales within our consolidated product categories have remained fairly consistent withinapproximated the following ranges:following:

We generated approximately 27%28% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 20062007 from products purchased from HP compared to 28%27%, and 32%28% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 20052006 and 2004,2005, respectively. There were no other vendors that accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2007, 2006 2005 or 2004.2005.

Customers and Services

We purchase products directly from manufacturers and publishers in large quantities for sale to an active reseller base of more than 90,000 VARs, direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers. While we sell products in various countries throughout the world, and customer channels may vary from region to region, over the past three years,during fiscal 2007, sales within our consolidated customer channels have remained fairly consistent withinapproximated the following ranges:following:

No single customer accounted for more than five percent of our net sales during fiscal 2007, 2006 2005 or 2004.2005.

The market for VARs is attractive because VARs generally rely on distributors as their principal source of computer products and financing. This reliance is due to VARs typically lacking the resources to establish a large number of direct purchasing relationships or stock significant product inventories. Direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers may establish direct relationships with manufacturers and publishers for their more popular products, but utilize distributors as the primary source for other product requirements and the alternative source for products acquired directly. We have also developed special programs to meet the unique needs of direct marketers and retailers.

In addition to a strong product offering, we provide resellers a high level of customer service through our training and technical support, suite of electronic commerce tools (including internet order entry and EDI services), customized shipping documents, product configuration/integration services and access to flexible financing programs. We also provide services to our vendors by giving them the opportunity to participate in a number of special promotions, and marketing services targeted to the needs of our resellers. While we believe that services such as these help to set us apart from our competition, they contribute less than 10% to our overall revenues.

- 3 -

We provide our vendors with one of the largest bases of resellers throughout the Americas and EMEA,Europe, delivering products to customers from our 2826 regionally located logistics centers. We have located our logistics centers near our customers which enables us to deliver products on a timely basis, thereby reducing the customers’ need to invest in inventory (see also Item 2—Properties for further discussion of our locations and logistics centers).

Sales and Electronic Commerce

Currently, ourOur sales force consists of approximately 1,300 field and inside telemarketing sales representatives. Our sales force is provided comprehensive training regarding our policies and procedures and technical characteristics of our products. These training programs are supplemented by product seminars offered by manufacturers and publishers. Field sales representatives are located in major metropolitan areas. Each field sales representative is supported by inside telemarketing sales teams covering a designated territory. Our team concept provides a strong personal relationship between our customers’ representatives and Tech Data. Territories with no field representation are serviced exclusively by the inside telemarketing sales teams. Customers typically call our inside sales teams on dedicated toll-free numbers or contact us through various electronic methods to place orders. If the product is in stock and the customer has available credit, customer orders are generally shipped the same day from the logistics center nearest the customer or the intended end-user.

Increasingly, customers rely upon our electronic ordering and information systems, in addition to our product catalogs and frequent mailings, as sources for product information, including availability and price. Our on-line computer systems allow the inside sales teams to check current stocking levels in the Company’s logistics centers. Through our website, most customers can gain remote access to our information systems to check product availability and pricing and to place orders. Certain of our larger customers have EDI services available whereby orders, order acknowledgments, invoices, inventory status reports, customized pricing information and other industry standard EDI transactions are consummated on-line, which improves efficiency and timeliness for ourselves and our customers. During fiscal 2006,2007, approximately $9.0$9.5 billion (44%) of our consolidated net sales originated from orders received electronically, compared to approximately $9.0 billion (44%) in fiscal 2006 and approximately $7.3 billion (37%) in fiscal 2005 and approximately $5.9 billion (34%) in fiscal 2004.2005.

Competition

We operate in a market characterized by intense competition, based upon such factors as product availability, credit availability, price, delivery and various services and support provided by the distributor to the customer. We believe that we are well equipped to compete effectively with other distributors in all of these areas.

We compete against several distributors in the Americas market, including Ingram Micro Inc., Synnex Corp., and several regional and local distributors. The competitive environment within EMEAEurope is highly fragmented, with market share spread among many regional and local competitors such as Actebis Group, and international distributors such as Ingram Micro Inc. and Westcon/Comstor.

We also compete, in some cases, with manufacturers and publishers who sell directly to resellers and end-users. However, we may become a business partner to these companies by providing supply chain or other services tailored to the IT market. We believe manufacturers and publishers will generally continue to sell their products through distributors rather than directly due to our ability to provide suppliers with access to our broad customer base in a highly efficient manner. Our network of logistics centers and our sales and product management expertise worldwide allow our suppliers to benefit by lowering their selling and inventory costs.

Employees

On January 31, 2006,2007, we had approximately 8,2008,000 employees. Certain of our employees in various countries outside of the United States are subject to laws providing representation rights to employees on workers councils. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales

We operate predominately in a single industry segment as a distributor of IT products, logistics management, and other value-added services. While we operate primarily in one industry, because of our global presence, we manage our business based on our geographic segments. Our geographic segments include the Americas (United(including the United States, Canada, Latin America and export sales to the Caribbean) and Europe, formerly referred to as EMEA (Europe,(including Europe, the Middle East and export sales to Africa). In fiscal 2007, 2006 2005, and 2004,2005, 60%, 62%60%, and 60%62%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales were derived from operations outside of the United States.

- 4 -

Over the last three fiscalpast several years, we have entered new markets, or expanded our presence in existing markets and exited certain markets based upon our assessment of, among other factors, risk and earnings potential. We continue to evaluate our risk exposure (e.g., risks surrounding currency rates, regulatory environments, political instability, etc.) and earnings potential around the world. To the extent we decide to close additional operations, we may incur charges and operating losses related to such closures write-off a portion of our EMEA goodwill or recognize a portion of our accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) as a non-operating foreign currency exchange gain or loss (see Note 1314 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the geographical distribution of our net sales, operating (loss) income, depreciation and amortization, capital expenditures, identifiable assets and goodwill).

Additional Information Available

Our principal Internet address is www.techdata.com. We provide our annual and quarterly reports free of charge on www.techdata.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We provide a link to all SEC filings where current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to previously filed reports may be accessed, free of charge.

Executive Officers

On January 18, 2006, we announced a plan to expand our senior management team by splitting the executive roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. In parallel, we have initiated a search for a new CEO. Steven A. Raymund will remain as Chairman and CEO until his successor is appointed, at which time he will continue as Chairman of the Board.

The following table sets forth the name, age and title of each of the persons who were serving as executive officers of Tech Data as of March 31, 2006:27, 2007:

Steven A. Raymund, Chairman of the Board of Directors andRobert M. Dutkowsky, Chief Executive Officer, has been employed byjoined Tech Data as chief executive officer and was appointed to the Company since 1981, serving as Chief Executive Officer since January 1986 and as Chairmanboard of the Board of Directors since April 1991.directors in October 2006. He has a Bachelornearly 30 years of Science Degreeexperience in Economics from the University of OregonIT industry including senior management positions in sales, marketing and a Masters Degree from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service. Mr. Raymund currently serves on the Board of Directors of Jabil Circuit, Inc.channel distribution with leading manufacturers and of WESCO Distribution, Inc.

Néstor Cano, President, Worldwide Operations, joined the Company (via the Computer 2000 acquisition)software publishers IBM, EMC and J.D. Edwards. His IT career began in July 1989 as a Software Product Manager and1977 with IBM. During his 20 years with IBM, he served in variousseveral senior management positions, within the Company’s operations in Spainincluding executive assistant to former IBM CEO Lou Gerstner, and Portugal from 1990 to 1995, after which time he was promoted to Regional Managing Director. In March 1999 he was appointed

- 5 -

Executive Vice President, Distribution – IBM Asia/Pacific. Prior to joining Tech Data, Mr. Dutkowsky was chairman, president and CEO of U.S. SalesEgenera, Inc., a utility computing company based in Marlboro, Massachusetts. He earned a bachelor’s degree in labor and Marketing, and in January 2000 he was promoted to President of the Americas. He was promoted to President, Worldwide Operations in August 2000. Mr. Cano holds a PDG (similar to an Executive MBA)industrial relations from IESE Business School in Barcelona and an Engineering Degree from BarcelonaCornell University.

Jeffery P. Howells, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company in October 1991 as Vice President of Finance and assumed the responsibilities of Chief Financial Officer in March 1992. In March 1993, he was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 1997. In 1998, Mr. Howells was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors. From 1979 to 1991, he was employed by Price Waterhouse. Mr. Howells is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree in Accounting from Stetson University.

Néstor Cano, President, Worldwide Operations, joined the Company (via the Computer 2000 acquisition) in July 1989 as a Software Product Manager and served in various management positions within the Company’s operations in Spain and Portugal from 1990 to 1995, after which time he was promoted to Regional Managing Director. In March 1999 he was appointed Executive Vice President of U.S. Sales and Marketing, and in January 2000 he was promoted to President of the Americas. He was promoted to President, Worldwide Operations in August 2000. Mr. Cano holds a PDG (similar to an Executive MBA) from IESE Business School in Barcelona and an Engineering Degree from Barcelona University.

Kenneth Lamneck, President, the Americas, joined the Company in March 2004 as President, the Americas. Prior to Tech Data, he served in various management positions at Arrow Electronics Distribution Division and most recently served as President of the Arrow Richey Electronics division since 1999. Mr. Lamneck holds a Bachelors Degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso.

Joseph A. Osbourn, Executive Vice President and Worldwide Chief Information Officer, joined the Company in October 2000. Prior to joining the Company, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Kmart Corporation from September 1999 to September 2000, Vice President of Information Services at Walt Disney World Company from September 1989 to September 1999, and with Price Waterhouse for ten years, most recently as a partner in Management Consulting Services. Mr. Osbourn holds a Bachelors Degree in Physics from the University of Louisville and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Memphis State University.

Alain Amsellem, Senior Vice President, European Finance and Operations, joined the Company in 1994 through Tech Data’s acquisition of French distributor, Softmart International, S.A. Mr. Amsellem was promoted to Senior Vice President in August 2004 and is currently responsible for European Finance and Operations. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Amsellem was Tech Data’s Director of French Operations. Mr. Amsellem is a Chartered Accountant and holds a degree in management and chartered accountancy from Paris Dauphine University.

Charles V. Dannewitz, Senior Vice President, Taxes and Treasurer, joined the Company in February 1995 as Vice President of Taxes. He was promoted to Senior Vice President of Taxes in March 2000, and assumed responsibility for worldwide treasury in July 2003. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Price Waterhouse for 13 years, most recently as a Tax Partner. Mr. Dannewitz is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from Illinois Wesleyan University.

Thomas J. Ducatelli, Senior Vice President, U.S. Sales, joined the Company in February 2005. Prior to joining Tech Data, he was Senior Vice President of Sales and Business Development for CompuCom Systems Inc. Mr. Ducatelli joined CompuCom in 1994 and held several leadership positions including National Sales Manager and Vice President of Business Development and Supply Chain before his promotion to senior vice president. Mr. Ducatelli holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Marketing from Southern Connecticut State University.

Andrew Gass, Senior Vice President, European Enterprise Division, joined the Company (via the Computer 2000 acquisition) in October 1995 as Finance and Operations Director of UK operations and was promoted to Deputy Managing Director in October 1998. From February 2000 to August 2001, Mr. Gass was a Managing Director at Sage Enterprise Solutions. He returned to the Company in 2001 as Senior Vice President and is currently in charge of the European Enterprise Division. Mr. Gass is a Chartered Accountant and holds a Bachelors Degree in Commerce from Edinburgh University.

Lawrence W. Hamilton,Senior Vice President, Human Resources, joined the Company in August 1993 as Vice President, Human Resources and was promoted to Senior Vice President, Human Resources in March 1996. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company from 1985 to August 1993, most recently as Vice President—Human Resources and Administration of Linvatec Corporation (a division of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company). Mr. Hamilton holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Political Science from Fisk University and a Masters of Public Administration, Labor Policy emphasis from the University of Alabama. Mr. Hamilton currently serves on the Board of Directors of HomeBanc Mortgage and is chairman of the compensation committee.

Thomas F. Huber, Senior Vice President, Managing Director, DACH Region, joined the Company in February 2005. Prior to joining the Company, he was Director of Consumer Products at Accenture from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Huber was Deputy Chairman of Supervisory Boards with Vienna-based Billa/Rewe Group of food retailers. During his 12 years with Billa/Rewe

- 6 -

Group, his positions included both Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Huber holds both a Doctorate and Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Vienna and a Masters Degree in Computer Science from the Technical University of Vienna.

William J. Hunter, Senior Vice President and European Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company in April 1994 as Assistant Controller. In September 1996, he was promoted to Director of International Finance and in June 1997 became the Vice President and Controller for Europe. Effective June 1999, Mr. Hunter was promoted to Senior Vice President and European Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Price Waterhouse from January 1989 to April 1994. Mr. Hunter holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Philosophy from Tulane University and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from the University of South Florida.

Robert G. O’Malley, Senior Vice President, U.S. Marketing,joined the Company in March 2005. Prior to joining the Company, he most recently served as a consultant working with technology manufacturers to develop distribution and marketing strategies. In 1999, Mr. O’Malley became President of Intermec Technologies Corp and was later appointed as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Immersion Inc. Mr. O’Malley also served as President of MicroAge Inc. and has over 19 years of experience with IBM, where he served in several senior leadership roles. Mr. O’Malley holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Arizona State University.

William K. Todd, Jr., Senior Vice President, Logistics and Integration Services, joined the Company in June 1999 as Vice President and General Manager of Configuration and Assembly and was promoted to Senior Vice President, Logistics and

Integration Services in April 2000. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Entex Information Services from September 1992 to June 1999 as the Senior Vice President of Distribution and Manufacturing. Mr. Todd holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Management from New Hampshire College.

Joseph B. Trepani, Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller, joined the Company in March 1990 as Controller and held the position of Director of Operations from October 1991 through January 1995. In February 1995, he was promoted to Vice President and Worldwide Controller and to Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller in March 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Trepani was Vice President of Finance for Action Staffing, Inc. from July 1989 to February 1990. From 1982 to 1989, he was employed by Price Waterhouse. Mr. Trepani is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from Florida State University.

David R. Vetter, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, joined the Company in June 1993 as Vice President and General Counsel and was promoted to Corporate Vice President and General Counsel in April 2000. In March 2003, he was promoted to his current position of Senior Vice President, and effective July 2003, was appointed Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by the law firm of Robbins, Gaynor & Bronstein, P.A. from 1984 to 1993, most recently as a partner. Mr. Vetter is a member of the Florida Bar Association and holds Bachelor of Arts Degrees in English and Economics from Bucknell University and a Juris Doctorate Degree from the University of Florida.

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial position and results of operations. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause the actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Before you buy our common stock or other securities, you should know that making such an investment involves risks, including the risks described below. The risks that have been highlighted below are not the only risks of our business. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock or other securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Certain risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include the following:

Competition

The Company operates in a highly competitive environment. The computer wholesale distribution industry is characterized by intense competition, based primarily on product availability, credit availability, price, speed of delivery, ability to tailor specific solutions to customer needs, quality and depth of product lines and training, service and support. Weakness in demand in the market intensifies the competitive environment in which the Company operates. The Company competes with a variety of regional, national and international wholesale distributors, some of which have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company also faces competition from companies entering or expanding into the logistics and product fulfillment and e-commerce supply chain services market.

Narrow Profit Margins

As a result of intense price competition in the industry, the Company has narrow gross profit and operating profit margins. These narrow margins magnify the impact on operating results attributed to variations in sales and operating costs. Future gross profit and operating margins may be adversely affected by changes in product mix, vendor pricing actions and competitive and economic pressures. In addition, failure to attract new sources of business from expansion of products or services or entry into new markets may adversely affect future gross profit and operating margins.

Dependence on Information Systems

The Company is highly dependent upon its internal computer and telecommunication systems to operate its business. There can be no assurance that the Company’s information systems will not fail or experience disruptions, that the Company will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the operation of such systems, that the Company will be able to expand and improve its information systems, that the Company will be able to convert to new systems efficiently, or that the Company will be able to integrate new programs effectively with its existing programs. Any of such problems could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Restructuring Activities

In May 2005, the Company initiated a restructuring program in the EMEA region. We may experience delays or greater than expected costs in implementing our restructuring program, and our efforts may fail to achieve the desired improvements in our EMEA operating and gross profit margins. Changes in organizational structure, personnel, job duties and processes related to this restructuring program will require significant management resources and may reduce productivity during implementation of the program. Because the Company operates with narrow operating margins and gross profit margins, lower productivity could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly if it occurs during seasonal peaks in our business.

Acquisitions

As part of its growth strategy, the Company pursues the acquisition of companies that either complement or expand its existing business. As a result, the Company regularly evaluates potential acquisition opportunities, which may be material in size and scope. Acquisitions involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including expansion into new geographic markets and business areas, the requirement to understand local business practices, the diversion of management’s attention to the assimilation of the operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock or other securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Certain risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include the following:

Competition

The Company operates in a highly competitive environment. The computer wholesale distribution industry is characterized by intense competition, based primarily on product availability, credit availability, price, speed of delivery, ability to tailor specific solutions to customer needs, quality and depth of product lines and training, service and support. Weakness in demand in the market intensifies the competitive environment in which the Company operates. The Company competes with a variety of regional, national and international wholesale distributors, some of which have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company also faces competition from companies entering or expanding into the logistics and product fulfillment and e-commerce supply chain services market.

Narrow Profit Margins

As a result of intense price competition in the industry, the Company has narrow gross profit and operating profit margins. These narrow margins magnify the impact on operating results attributed to variations in sales and operating costs. Future gross profit and operating margins may be adversely affected by changes in product mix, vendor pricing actions and competitive and economic pressures. In addition, failure to attract new sources of business from expansion of products or services or entry into new markets may adversely affect future gross profit and operating margins.

Dependence on Information Systems

The Company is highly dependent upon its internal computer and telecommunication systems to operate its business. There can be no assurance that the Company’s information systems will not fail or experience disruptions, that the Company will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the operation of such systems, that the Company will be able to expand and improve its information systems, that the Company will be able to convert to new systems efficiently, or that the Company will be able to integrate new programs effectively with its existing programs. Any of such problems could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Acquisitions

As part of its growth strategy, the Company pursues the acquisition of companies that either complement or expand its existing business. As a result, the Company regularly evaluates potential acquisition opportunities, which may be material in size and scope. Acquisitions involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including expansion into new geographic markets and business areas, the requirement to understand local business practices, the diversion of management’s attention to the assimilation of the operations

and personnel of the acquired companies, the possible requirement to upgrade the acquired companies’ management information systems to the Company’s standards, potential adverse short-term effects on the Company’s operating results and the amortization or impairment of any acquired intangible assets.

- 8 -

Exposure to Natural Disasters, War, and Terrorism

The Company’s headquarters facilities and some of its logistics centers as well as certain vendors and customers are located in areas prone to natural disasters such as floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, or earthquakes. In addition, demand for the Company’s services is concentrated in major metropolitan areas. Adverse weather conditions, major electrical failures or other natural disasters in these major metropolitan areas may disrupt the Company’s business should its ability to distribute products be impacted by such an event.

The Company operates in multiple geographic markets, several of which may be susceptible to acts of war and terrorism. The Company’s business could be adversely affected should its ability to distribute products be impacted by such events.

The Company and many of its suppliers receive parts and products from Asia and operate in many parts of the world that may be susceptible to disease or epidemic that may disrupt the Company’s ability to receive or deliver products or other disruptions in operations.

Dependence on Independent Shipping Companies

The Company relies on arrangements with independent shipping companies, such as Federal Express and United Parcel Service, for the delivery of its products from vendors and to customers. The failure or inability of these shipping companies to deliver products, or the unavailability of their shipping services, even temporarily, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company may also be adversely affected by an increase in freight surcharges due to rising fuel costs and added security. There can be no assurance that Tech Data will be able to pass along the full effect of an increase in these surcharges to its customers.

Labor Strikes

The Company’s labor force is currently non-union with the exception of employees of certain European and Latin American subsidiaries, which are subject to collective bargaining or similar arrangements. The Company does business in certain foreign countries where labor disruption is more common than is experienced in the United States and some of the freight carriers used by the Company are unionized. A labor strike by a group of the Company’s employees, one of the Company’s freight carriers, one of its vendors, a general strike by civil service employees, or a governmental shutdown could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. Many of the products the Company sells are manufactured in countries other than the countries in which the Company’s logistics centers are located. The inability to receive products into the logistics centers because of government action or labor disputes at critical ports of entry may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Risk of Declines in Inventory Value

The Company is subject to the risk that the value of its inventory will decline as a result of price reductions by vendors or technological obsolescence. It is the policy of most of the Company’s vendors to protect distributors from the loss in value of inventory due to technological change or the vendors’ price reductions. Some vendors, however, may be unwilling or unable to pay the Company for price protection claims or products returned to them under purchase agreements. Moreover, industry practices are sometimes not embodied in written agreements and do not protect the Company in all cases from declines in inventory value. No assurance can be given that such practices to protect distributors will continue, that unforeseen new product developments will not adversely affect the Company, or that the Company will be able to successfully manage its existing and future inventories.

Product Availability

The Company is dependent upon the supply of products available from its vendors. The industry is characterized by periods of severe product shortages due to vendors’ difficulties in projecting demand for certain products distributed by the Company. When such product shortages occur, the Company typically receives an allocation of product from the vendor. There can be no assurance that vendors will be able to maintain an adequate supply of products to fulfill all of the Company’s customer orders on a timely basis. Failure to obtain adequate product supplies could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Vendor Terms and Conditions

The Company relies on various rebates, cash discounts, and cooperative marketing programs offered by its vendors to support expenses associated with distributing and marketing the vendors’ products. Currently, the rebates and purchase discounts offered

by vendors are influenced by sales volumes and percentage increases in sales, and are subject to changes by the vendors. Additionally, certain of the Company’s vendors subsidize floorplan financing arrangements for the benefit of our customers. Terminations of a supply or services agreement or a significant change in supplier terms or conditions of sale could negatively affect our operating margins, revenue or the level of capital required to fund our operations.

- 9 -

The Company receives a significant percentage of revenues from products it purchases from relatively few manufacturers. As has historically been the case, a manufacturer may make rapid, significant and adverse changes in its sales terms and conditions, such as reducing the amount of price protection and return rights as well as reducing the level of purchase discounts and rebates they make available to us, or may merge with or acquire other significant manufacturers. The Company’s gross margins could be materially and negatively impacted if the Company is unable to pass through the impact of these changes to the Company’s customers or cannot develop systems to manage ongoing supplier programs. In addition, the Company’s standard vendor distribution agreement permits termination without cause by either party upon 30 days notice. The loss of a relationship with any of the Company’s key vendors, a change in their strategy (such as increasing direct sales), the merging of significant manufacturers, or significant changes in terms on their products may adversely effect the Company’s business.

Loss of Significant Customers

Customers do not have an obligation to make purchases from the Company. In some cases, the Company has made adjustments to its systems, vendor offerings, and processes, and made staffing decisions, in order to accommodate the needs of a significant customer. In the event a significant customer decides to make its purchases from another distributor, experiences a significant change in demand from its own customer base, becomes financially unstable, or is acquired by another company, the Company’s receipt of revenues may be significantly affected, resulting in an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Customer Credit Exposure

The Company sells its products to a large customer base of value-added resellers, direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers. The Company finances a significant portion of such sales through trade credit. As a result, the Company’s business could be adversely affected in the event of a deterioration of the financial condition of its customers, resulting in the customers’ inability to repay the Company. This risk may increase if there is a general economic downturn affecting a large number of the Company’s customers and in the event the Company’s customers do not adequately manage their business or properly disclose their financial condition.

Need for Liquidity and Capital Resources; Fluctuations in Interest Rates

The Company’s business requires substantial capital to operate and to finance accounts receivable and product inventory that are not financed by trade creditors. The Company has historically relied upon cash generated from operations, bank credit lines, trade credit from its vendors, proceeds from public offerings of its common stock and proceeds from debt offerings to satisfy its capital needs and finance growth. The Company utilizes various financing instruments such as receivables securitization, leases, revolving credit facilities and trade receivable purchase facilities. As the financial markets change and new regulations come into effect, the cost of acquiring financing and the methods of financing may change. Changes in our credit rating or other market factors may increase our interest expense or other costs of capital, or capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms to fund our working capital needs. The Company will continue to need additional financing, including debt financing. The inability to obtain such sources of capital could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company’s credit facilities contain various financial and other covenants that may limit the Company’s ability to borrow or limit the Company’s flexibility in responding to business conditions. These financing instruments involve variable rate debt, thus exposing the Company to risk of fluctuations in interest rates. Such fluctuations in interest rates could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risks; Exposure to Foreign Markets

The Company conducts business in countries outside of the United States, which exposes the Company to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company may enter into short-term forward exchange or option contracts to hedge this risk; nevertheless, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. In particular, the value of the Company’s equity investment in foreign countries may fluctuate based upon changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These fluctuations, which are recorded in a cumulative translation adjustment account, may result in losses in the event a foreign subsidiary is sold or closed at a time when the foreign currency is weaker than when the Company initially invested in the country.

- 10 -

The Company’s international operations are subject to other risks such as the imposition of governmental controls, export license requirements, restrictions on the export of certain technology, political instability, trade restrictions, tariff changes, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, changes in the interpretation and enforcement of laws (in particular related to items such as duty and taxation), difficulties in collecting accounts receivable, longer collection periods and the impact of local economic conditions and practices. There can be no assurance that these and other factors will not have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Potential Asset Impairments from Declines in Operating Performance

The Company assesses potential impairments to long-lived assets, including property and equipment, certain deferred tax assets, certain intangible assets and other long-lived assets, when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company assesses potential impairments to indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill and deferred tax assets, at least annually and more frequently if current events and circumstances indicate a possible impairment. The Company’s operations in the EMEA region have been considerably more challenging as a result of somewhat weaker demand in certain countries in Europe and slowing IT demand. As a result, the Company has launched a formal restructuring program for the EMEA region. Should the operating performance in EMEA not improve, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment charge related to its long-lived and/or indefinite-lived assets. A significant impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results for the period during which the impairment is recorded.

Changes in Income Tax and Other Regulatory Legislation

The Company operates in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. When new legislation is enacted with minimal advance notice, or when new interpretations or applications of existing laws are made, the Company may need to implement changes in its policies or structure.

In addition, recent legislation requires all member states of the European Union to adopt the European Directive 2002/96/EC regarding Waste in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE Directive”) and 2002/95/EC regarding restrictions of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (“RoHS Directive”) into national law. The manner and timing of adoption of these laws may impactimpacts the Company as, in some countries, it remains unclear to what extent and the manner in which the Company will be deemed a producer subject to compliance with these regulations and the financial costs and guarantees thereby required.

The Company makes plans for its structure and operations based upon existing laws and anticipated future changes in the law. The Company is susceptible to unanticipated changes in legislation, especially relating to income and other taxes, import/export laws, hazardous materials and electronic waste recovery legislation, and other laws related to trade, accounting, and business activities. Such changes in legislation, both domestic and international, may have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Changes in Accounting Rules

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and various other bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies or a new interpretation of an existing policy could have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions before a change is announced.

- 11 -

Volatility of Common Stock Price

Because of the foregoing factors, as well as other variables affecting the Company’s operating results, past financial performance should not be considered a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods. In addition, the Company’s participation in a highly dynamic industry often results in significant volatility of the common stock price. Some of the factors that may affect the market price of the common stock, in addition to those discussed above, are changes in investment recommendations by securities analysts, changes in market valuations of competitors and key vendors, and fluctuations in the overall stock market, but particularly in the technology sector.

ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.Properties

Our worldwide executive offices are located in Clearwater, Florida. As of January 31, 2006,2007, we operated a total of 2826 logistics centers to provide our customers timely delivery of products. These logistics centers are located in the following principal markets: Americas – 13,14, and EMEAEurope – 15.12.

As of January 31, 2006,2007, we leased or owned approximately seven million square feet of space worldwide. The majority of our office facilities and logistics centers are leased. Our facilities are well maintained and are adequate to conduct our current business. We do not anticipate material difficulty in renewing our leases as they expire or securing replacement facilities.

ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings

Prior to fiscal 2004, one of our European subsidiaries was audited in relation to various value-added tax (“VAT”) matters. As a result of those audits, the subsidiary received notices of assessment that allege the subsidiary did not properly collect and remit VAT. It is our opinion, based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, that we have valid defenses related to a substantial portion of these assessments. Although we are vigorously pursuing administrative and judicial action to challenge the assessments, no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome. The resolution of such assessments could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period.

We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the outcome in any of these other legal proceedings, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There have been no matters submitted to a vote of shareholders during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006.

- 12 -2007.

PART II

ITEM 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “TECD”. We have not paid cash dividends since fiscal 1983 and the Board of Directors has no current plans to institute a cash dividend payment policy in the foreseeable future. The table below presents the quarterly high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. As of February 28, 2006,March 1, 2007, there were 405368 holders of record. We believe that there are approximately 43,00044,000 beneficial holders.

Equity Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan Information

The number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding optionsshare-based equity incentives granted to employees and non-employee directors, as well as the number of shares remaining available for future issuance, under our equity compensation and stock purchase plans as of January 31, 20062007 are summarized in the following table:

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

- 13 -

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In March 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock (increased to $200.0 million in November 2005). As of October 31, 2006, the Company’s share repurchase program authorized in fiscal 2006 was completed. The share repurchases arewere made on the open market, through block trades or otherwise. The number of shares purchased and the timing of the purchases iswere based on working capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. Shares repurchased by the Company are held in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under employee equity incentive and benefit plans.

The following table presents information with respect to purchases of common stock by the Company under the share repurchase program during the quarter ended January 31, 2006:

- 14 -

ITEM 6.Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data. In the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2006, in order to dedicate strategic efforts and resources to core growth opportunities,2007, management madesold the decision to sell the EMEAEuropean Training Business (the “Training Business”). The results of operations of the Training Business have been reclassified and presented as “income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax”, for all periods presented below. The balance sheet data has not been reclassified as the net assets of the Training Business are less than 0.5% of the total net assets of the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with the MD&A and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY

(In thousands, except per share data)

- 15 -

- 16 -

ITEM 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), contains forward-looking statements, as described in the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of Tech Data Corporation are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers are referred to the cautionary statements and important factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 20062007 for further information. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following:

- 17 -

Overview

Tech Data is a leading distributor of information technology (“IT”) products, logistics management and other value-added services. We distribute microcomputer hardware and software products to value-added resellers, corporate resellers, direct marketers and retailers. Our offering of value-added customer services includes training and technical support, external financing options, configuration services, outbound telemarketing, marketing services and a suite of electronic commerce solutions. We manage our business in two geographic segments: the Americas (includes(including the United States, Canada, Latin America and export sales to the Caribbean) and Europe, formerly referred to as EMEA (includes(including Europe, the Middle East and export sales to Africa).

Our strategy is to leverage our efficient cost structure combined with our multiple service offerings to generate demand and cost efficiencies for our suppliers and customers around the world. The IT distribution industry in which we operate is characterized by narrow gross profit as a percentage of sales (“gross margin”) and narrow income from operations as a percentage of sales (“operating margin”). Historically, our gross and operating margins have been impacted by intense price competition, as well as changes in terms and conditions with our suppliers, including those terms related to rebates and other incentives and price protection. We expect

these competitive pricing pressures to continue in the foreseeable future, and therefore, we will continue to evaluate our pricing policies and terms and conditions offered to our customers in response to changes in our vendors’ terms and conditions and the general market environment. We will continue to focus on not only disciplined pricing and purchasing practices, but also on realigning our customer and vendor portfolio to support a sustainable higher margin business that will help drive long-term profitability throughout all of our operations. As we continue to evaluate our existing pricing policies and make future changes, if any, within our customer or vendor portfolio, we may experience moderated sales growth or sales declines. In addition, increased competition and changes in general economic conditions within the markets in which we conduct business may hinder our ability to maintain and/or improve gross margin from its current level.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, in order to dedicate strategic efforts and resources to core growth opportunities, we made the decision to sell the EMEA Training Business (the “Training Business”). In March 2006, we closed the sale of the Training Business to a third-party for total cash consideration of $16.5 million and $0.5 million of additional consideration which is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain post-closing conditions. Our results of operations for the Training Business have been reclassified and presented as “income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented. The reclassification of the Training Business had the effect of reducing previously reported gross margin and SG&A as a percentage of sales by approximately .20% to .23% of consolidated net sales for all periods restated. The impact on previously reported operating margin was relatively insignificant. The assets and liabilities of the Training Business have not been reclassified in our January 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet as the net assets of the Training Business are less than 0.5% of the total consolidated net assets of the Company.

From a balance sheet perspective, we require working capital primarily to finance accounts receivable and inventory. We have historically relied upon debt, trade credit from our vendors, and accounts receivable financing programs for our working capital needs. We believe our balance sheet at January 31, 20062007 was one of the strongest in the industry, with a debt to capital ratio (calculated as total debt divided by the aggregate of total debt and total shareholders’ equity) of 12%21%.

Our business continuesWe continue to perform well in the Americas; however, we have been disappointedbe satisfied with our results in EMEA. In May 2005, in response to a weaker demand environment in EMEA, we announced a formal restructuring program for our EMEA operations (further discussed below). We believe our challenges in the EMEA regionperformance over the last several quarters areyears within the Americas. However, our profitability within Europe has been well below our expectations. We believe our lack of acceptable operating performance in Europe was the result of a combination of factors, including somewhat weaker demand conditions in certain countries, competitive pricing pressures, declining average selling prices and, most notably, the diverted focus of our management team in the region. Specifically, the combined effect of the completion of the final phases of our comprehensive IT systems upgrade and harmonization project, further integration of our Azlan operations and, most recently, the implementation of our EMEAEuropean restructuring program initiated in May 2005, diverted the focus of our management team in the region from executing appropriate pricing, purchasing and sales management practices.

We are beginningIn order to seededicate our strategic efforts and focus towards core growth opportunities, as well as our European turnaround, during the benefitsfirst quarter of fiscal 2007, we completed the sale of our Training Business to a third-party for total cash consideration of $16.5 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of $3.8 million. Our results of operations for the Training Business and the gain on the sale of the Training Business have been reclassified and presented as “discontinued operations, net of tax” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented. The reclassification of the Training Business had the effect of reducing previously reported gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) as a percentage of consolidated net sales by approximately .20% to .23% for fiscal 2006 and 2005. The impact on previously reported operating margin for these periods was relatively insignificant. The assets and liabilities of the Training Business have not been reclassified in our January 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet as the net assets of the Training Business were less than 0.5% of the total consolidated net assets of the Company.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, our challenges in Europe intensified. During this quarter, we recorded sharply lower than expected revenues which we believe was the result of a further deceleration in IT demand within Europe, in comparison to previous quarters. This deceleration in IT demand during the quarter, particularly within Western Europe where the majority of our European revenue is derived, was a key factor leading to a heightened level of pricing pressure experienced within the region during the quarter. This further deceleration in IT demand and heightened pricing pressure, coupled with continued internal distractions of management related to the restructuring program, resulted in our European operating results for the quarter falling well short of our internal expectations. As a result, we believed we had strong indicators of impairment of our goodwill in Europe and, therefore, we performed an impairment test for goodwill as of July 31, 2006. This goodwill impairment analysis reflected the recast of both our short and longer-term European financial outlook and resulted in our determination that a $136.1 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge was necessary as of July 31, 2006.

As a result of the market factors discussed in the paragraph above, we believe it will take longer than originally anticipated to reach an acceptable level of profitability in Europe. The major initiatives surrounding our restructuring program were completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, and the savings realized from our actions to restructure and optimizerestructuring initiatives have partially offset the pressure on our operations ingross margins experienced during the EMEA region. These actionsyear. In addition, the dedicated resources which have included: engaging external consultants to provide a fresh perspective and detailed recommendations, such as the implementation of a new, simplified EMEA management organizational structure; assigning dedicated resourcesbeen assigned across the region to improve ouroptimize pricing, purchasing and sales management practices; and implementing our restructuring program. In addition, bothpractices have begun to produce improvements. During the Azlan integration and our IT systems upgrade and harmonization project were substantially complete at the endsecond semester of fiscal 2006, which is expected to alleviate further diversion of management resources to these initiatives.

- 18 -

With respect to our restructuring program,2007, we have recorded charges for workforce reductionsseen our European operations begin to stabilize with improving revenue growth and the optimization of facilities and systems. Excluding external consulting costs, total cash charges associated with the restructuring program are estimated to be in the range of $40.0 million to $50.0 million, comprised of $24.0 to $30.0 million related to workforce reductions and $16.0 to $20.0 million relatedgross margins compared to the optimizationfirst semester of facilitiesfiscal 2007. While we still have opportunities and systems. We expect initiatives relatedexpectations for additional improvement, we believe that our performance within several countries, especially during the second semester of fiscal 2007, is a positive indicator of the Company’s ability to improve our operating performance in Europe. However, we continue to remain cautiously optimistic, as the restructuring programcompetitive environment and changes in general economic conditions within the markets in which we conduct business may hinder our ability to generate annualized savings incontinue to improve our operating margins from their current level.

Effective February 1, 2006, we adopted the same range. Throughfair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payments” (“SFAS No. 123R”), using the modified prospective transition method, and therefore have not restated our results of operations for the prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2007 includes compensation expense for stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 31, 2006, and for stock-based compensation awards granted after January 31, 2006. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the Company has incurred $30.9ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, we recognize stock-based compensation expense, reduced for estimated forfeitures, on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award. During fiscal 2007, we recognized $8.0 million of stock-based compensation expense as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. See further discussion related to the restructuring program, comprisedour adoption of approximately $18.9 million related to workforce reductions and approximately $12.0 million for facility costs. The remaining charges are expected to be incurred over the next three quarters with all U.S. dollar amounts being approximated using an exchange rate of .837 euros per U.S. dollar. Costs related to the restructuring program have been funded by operating cash flows and our credit facilities. Costs recorded in each quarter may vary depending upon the timing of certain actions. The costs related to this restructuring program, other than the external consulting costs, are reflected within the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “restructuring charges”, which is a component of operating income. In addition, during the nine months ended January 31, 2006, the Company incurred approximately $9.6 million of external consulting costs related to the restructuring program. These consulting costs areSFAS No. 123R included in “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company expects to continue to incur external consulting costs related to the restructuring program in fiscal 2007. These consulting costs, along with the costs of internal personnel dedicated to the implementation of the restructuring program and other incremental costs indirectly related to the restructuring program, will partially offset the savings we expect to realize from the EMEA restructuring program during fiscal year 2007 (see further discussion below and in Note 61 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for related discussion of our restructuring program).Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The information included within MD&A is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventory, vendor incentives, goodwill and intangible assets, deferred taxes, and contingencies. Our estimates and judgments are based on currently available information, historical results, and other assumptions we believe are reasonable. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Accounts Receivable

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. In estimating the required allowance, we take into consideration the overall quality and aging of the receivable portfolio, the existence of credit insurance and specifically identified customer risks. Also influencing our estimates are the following: (1) the large number of customers and their dispersion across wide geographic areas; (2) the fact that no single customer accounts for more than 5% of our net sales; (3) the value and adequacy of collateral received from customers, if any and 4) our historical loss experience. If actual customer performance were to deteriorate to an extent not expected by us, additional allowances may be required which could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial results. Conversely, if actual customer performance were to improve to an extent not expected by us a reduction in allowances may be required which could have a favorable effect on our consolidated financial results.

Inventory

We value our inventory at the lower of its cost or market value, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out method. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon an aging analysis of the inventory on hand, specifically known inventory-related risks (such as technological obsolescence and the nature of vendor terms surrounding price protection and product returns), foreign currency fluctuations for foreign-sourced product, and assumptions about future demand. Market conditions or changes in terms and conditions by our vendors that are less favorable than those projected by management may require additional inventory write-downs, which could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial results.

Vendor Incentives

We receive incentives from vendors related to cooperative advertising allowances, infrastructure funding, volume rebates and other incentive agreements. These incentives are generally under quarterly, semi-annual or annual agreements with the vendors; however, some of these incentives are negotiated on an ad-hoc basis to support specific programs mutually developed with the vendor. Unrestricted volume rebates and early payment discounts received from vendors are recorded as a reduction of inventory upon receipt of funds and as a reduction of cost of products sold as the related inventory is sold. Incentives received from vendors for specifically identified cooperative advertising programs and infrastructure funding are recorded as adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses, and any reimbursement in excess of the related cost is recorded in the same manner as unrestricted volume rebates, as discussed above.

- 19 -

Actual rebates may vary based on volume or other sales achievement levels, which could result in an increase or reduction in the estimated amounts previously accrued. We also provide reserves for receivables on vendor programs for estimated losses resulting from vendors’ inability to pay or rejections of claims by vendors. Should amounts recorded as outstanding receivables from vendors be uncollectible, additional allowances may be required which could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial results.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

The carrying value of goodwill is reviewed at least annually for impairment and may also be reviewed more frequently if current events and circumstances indicate a possible impairment. An impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified. We also examine the carrying value of our intangible assets with finite lives, which includes capitalized software and development costs, purchased intangibles, and other long-lived assets as current events and circumstances warrant determining whether there are any impairment losses. If indicators of impairment are present and future cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the assets’ carrying amount, an impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified. Factors that may cause a goodwill, intangible asset or other long-lived asset impairment include negative industry or economic trends and significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results. Our valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, estimating the net present value of the projected cash flows of our reporting units. If actual results are substantially lower than our projections underlying these assumptions, or if market discount rates substantially increase, our future valuations could be adversely affected, potentially resulting in future impairment charges.

Income Taxes

We record valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of a recorded valuation allowance, we consider all positive and negative evidence and a variety of factors including, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, historical and projected future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. If we determine we would be able to use a deferred tax asset in the future in excess of its net carrying value, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be made to reduce income tax expense, thereby increasing net income in the period such determination was made. Should we determine that we are unable to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be made to income tax expense, thereby reducing net income in the period such determination was made. However, the recognition of any future tax benefit resulting from the reduction of the $6.3 million valuation allowance associated with the purchase of Azlan would be recorded as a reduction of goodwill.

Contingencies

We accrue for contingent obligations, including estimated legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. As facts concerning contingencies become known, we reassess our position and make appropriate adjustments to the financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal, and other regulatory matters such as imports and exports, the imposition of international governmental controls, changes in the interpretation and enforcement of international laws (in particular related to items such as duty and taxation), and the impact of local economic conditions and practices, which are all subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation process.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Legislation

See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the discussion on recent accounting pronouncements and legislation.

Results of Operations

Except for the section relating to discontinued operations, the Results of Operations discussion below relates only to continuing operations.

- 20 -

The following tables set forth our net sales and operating income, by geographic region, for the years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004:2005:

We sell many products purchased from the world’s leading peripheral, system and networking manufacturers and software publishers. Products purchased from HP generated 27%28%, 28%27% and 32%28% of our net sales in fiscal 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, respectively. There were no other manufacturers or publishers that accounted for 10% or more of our net sales in the past three years.

The following table sets forth our Consolidated Statement of Operations as a percentage of net sales for each of the three most recent fiscal years:

Net Sales

Our consolidated net sales were $21.4 billion in fiscal 2007, an increase of 4.7% when compared to fiscal 2006. On a regional basis, during fiscal 2007, net sales in the Americas increased by 5.3% over fiscal 2006 and increased by 4.1% in Europe (an increase of 1.5% on a euro basis). Our sales performance in the Americas is primarily due to stronger sales to direct marketers and retailers compared to the prior year somewhat offset by declining average selling prices of many of the products we sell. The increase in European sales in fiscal 2007 is primarily the result of the improved IT demand experienced in the second semester of fiscal 2007 and improved stability in our European operations partially offset by much lower demand in Western Europe during the first semester of fiscal 2007 (particularly in the second quarter).

Our consolidated net sales were approximately $20.5 billion during fiscal 2006, an increase of 3.8% when compared to fiscal 2005. On a regional basis, during fiscal 2006, net sales in the Americas increased by 11.6% over fiscal 2005 and decreased by 2.0% in EMEA (decrease of 0.6% on a euro basis). Our performance in the Americas iswas primarily due to strongerreasons similar to those described above regarding our fiscal 2007 sales to direct marketers and retailers and a general improvement in demand for IT products and services compared to the prior year, somewhat offset by declining average selling prices of many products we sell. As previously discussed in this MD&A, ourperformance. Our performance in EMEAEurope can be attributed to a combination of factors, including somewhat weaker demand conditions in certain countries, competitive pricing pressures resulting in declining average selling prices and, most notably, the diverted focus of our management team in the region.

During fiscal 2005, we saw our consolidated net sales grow to $19.7 billion, a 13.7% increase over fiscal 2004. This growth can be attributed to strong demand in both the Americas and EMEA. Our performance within EMEA was further enhanced by the strengthening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar, which contributed approximately half of the 18.2% sales growth we reported in

- 21 -

the region. Our sales growth in EMEA was also positively impacted in fiscal 2005 from the inclusion of twelve months of operations of Azlan compared to including only ten months of operations in fiscal 2004. Azlan, one of the leading European distributors of networking and communications equipment, was acquired by Tech Data in March 2003. Our legacy operations (i.e., excluding Azlan) in EMEA also experienced sales growth in the high single digits, reflecting the strong demand for IT products during the fiscal year.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (“gross margin”) during fiscal 20062007 was 4.99%4.70%, a decrease from 5.39%4.99% in fiscal 2005.2006. The decrease in gross margin is primarily attributable to the highly competitivemore challenging pricing environment in Europe, particularly in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and operational challengesthe internal distractions of management related to the final phases of our comprehensive IT systems upgrade and harmonization project and the implementation of the restructuring program in our EMEA operations,Europe, as discussed above,above. Since the completion of these initiatives during the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we have seen our European operations begin to stabilize and to a much lesser extent, changesgross margins in customerthe region improve sequentially during the third and product mix in both EMEA and the Americas. We continuously evaluate our pricing policies and terms and conditions offered to our customers in response to changes in our vendors’ terms and conditions and the general market environment. Asfourth quarters of fiscal 2007. However, we continue to evaluate our existing pricing policies and make future changes, if any, we may experience moderated sales growth or sales declines. In addition, increased competitionremain cautiously optimistic as the competitive environment and changes in general economic conditions within the markets in which we conduct business may hinder our ability to maintain and/or continue to improve gross margin from its current level.

Gross margin during fiscal 20052006 was 5.39%4.99%, compared to 5.44%a decrease from 5.39% in fiscal 2004. This2005. The decrease is the result ofin gross margin was primarily attributable to the highly competitive pricing environment and operational challenges in our European operations, as discussed above, and to a much lesser extent, changes in customer and product mix in both Europe and the Americas and EMEA, partially offset by the effect of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF Issue No. 02-16”). EITF Issue No. 02-16 requires, under certain circumstances, consideration received from vendors be treated as a reduction of cost of goods sold and not as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses. EITF Issue No. 02-16 further requires the recognition of such consideration be deferred until the related inventory is sold. As the guidance was applicable only to vendor arrangements entered into or modified subsequent to December 31, 2002, it was effective for all vendor arrangements throughout fiscal 2005; however, it had only a partial impact during fiscal 2004. As a result, gross margin in fiscal 2005 included 45 basis points of vendor consideration reclassified from selling, general and administrative expenses compared to 26 basis points being reclassified in fiscal 2004.

In addition to the impact of EITF Issue No. 02-16, the inclusion of a full twelve months of Azlan’s results (which generates higher gross margins than our “legacy” operations) in fiscal 2005 compared to ten months in fiscal 2004 also positively affected our gross margin comparisons on a year-over-year basis; however this impact was far less than the impact of EITF Issue No. 02-16.Americas.

Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”)

SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 3.98% in fiscal 2007, compared to 4.04% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2007 is the result of improvements in productivity, particularly in Europe, where we are realizing the benefits associated with our restructuring efforts.

In absolute dollars, worldwide SG&A increased by $22.8 million in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. The increase in SG&A in fiscal 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase in credit costs in both the Americas and Europe due to higher than anticipated bankruptcies and other credit losses, increased labor costs in the Americas, a stronger euro versus the U.S. dollar in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006, and an additional $8.0 million of compensation expense related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R in fiscal 2007. These increases were offset in part by the productivity improvements and benefits realized in Europe from the restructuring program, which we completed during the third fiscal quarter of 2007. SG&A includes external consulting costs related to the European restructuring program of $8.6 million and $9.6 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.

SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 4.04% in fiscal 2006, compared to 4.22% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2006 iswas the result of continuing cost savings initiatives and improvements in productivity, particularly in EMEA,Europe, where we are beginningbegan to realize the benefits associated with our restructuring efforts. Also contributing to our decrease in SG&A iswas a reduction in credit costs due to favorable credit experience and the positive resolution of contingencies associated with certain customer accounts. We strive to continuously improve our business model through our constant monitoring of costs, including tight budgetary controls and productivity reviews. These productivity reviews result in a variable cost model with an ability to better respond to changes in market demand compared to those companies with high fixed costs.

In absolute dollars, worldwide SG&A decreased by $3.9 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. The decrease in fiscal 2006 iswas primarily due to the benefits realized from the restructuring program and the decrease in credit costs, partially offset by $9.6 million of external consulting costs incurred related to our EMEAEuropean restructuring program, an increase in labor costs in the Americas to support the additional sales and, to a lesser extent, a stronger U.S. dollar versus the euro in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005.

SG

Goodwill Impairment

As discussed earlier in this MD&A, due to certain indicators of impairment within our European reporting unit, the Company performed an impairment test for goodwill as a percentage of net sales decreased to 4.22% in fiscal 2005, compared to 4.45% in fiscal 2004.July 31, 2006. This decrease istesting included the result of continuing costs savings initiatives and improvements in productivity, offset in part by the effects of EITF Issue No. 02-16. In absolute dollars, SG&A increased by $60.4 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. This increase is attributable to the continued strengtheningdetermination of the euro againstEuropean reporting unit’s fair value using market multiples and discounted cash flows modeling. The Company’s reduced earnings and cash flow forecast for our European region resulted in the U.S. dollar andCompany determining that a goodwill impairment charge was necessary. As of July 31, 2006, the implementation of EITF Issue No. 02-16, as discussed above. Excluding these factors, SG&A actually declinedCompany recorded a $136.1 million non-cash charge for the goodwill impairment in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 as a result of our tight budgetary controls and productivity reviews.Europe.

- 22 -

Restructuring Charges

As discussed earlier in this MD&A, in May 2005, we announced a formal restructuring program to better align the EMEAEuropean operating cost structure with the current business environment. In connection with thisAs of October 31, 2006, the initiatives related to the European restructuring program we continue to record charges for workforce reductions and the optimization of facilities and systems. For the year ended January 31, 2006,had been completed. During fiscal 2007, we incurred $30.9$23.8 million related to the restructuring program, comprised of approximately $18.9$20.0 million for workforce reductions and $3.8 million for facility costs. In total, from inception through completion of the program, we incurred $54.7 million related to the restructuring program, comprised of $38.9 million for workforce reductions and approximately $12.0$15.8 million for facility costs.

Special Charges

During fiscal 2004, we incurred special charges of $3.1 million, or .02% of net sales, related to the closure of our education business in the United States and the restructuring of this business to a more variable cost-based, outsourced model. These charges primarily include costs associated with employee severance, facility lease terminations and the write-off of fixed assets associated with the business.

Interest Expense, Discount on Sale of Accounts Receivable, Interest Income, Foreign Currency Exchange Gains/Losses

Interest expense increased 22.5% to $38.5 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $31.4 million in fiscal 2006. The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2007 is primarily attributable to the repurchase of the $290.0 million convertible subordinated debentures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 using revolving credit facilities, which have higher short-term borrowing rates. In addition, average short-term interest rates increased in comparison to the prior fiscal year, resulting in an increase in interest expense in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.

Interest expense increased 10.4% to $31.4 million in fiscal 2006 compared to $28.5 million in the prior year.fiscal 2005. The increase in interest expense during fiscal 2006 iswas primarily due to additional working capital requirements resulting from higher sales volume and an increase in our average short-term borrowing rate compared to the prior fiscal year. Interest income increased 32.5% to $7.4 million in fiscal 2006 from $5.6 million in the prior year. The increase in interest income during fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 is primarily attributable to higher interest rates earned on short-term cash investments compared to the prior fiscal year.

DiscountsDiscount on the sale of accounts receivable totaled $12.5 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in fiscal 2007 and 2006. The discount is associated with the accounts receivable purchase facility agreements executed in fiscal 2006 (see further discussion below in this MD&A and in Note 34 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The increase in the discount on sale of accounts receivable from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 reflects the fact that the Company began selling accounts receivable under the program in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 which resulted in an increase in the average amount of accounts receivables sold under the programs and an increase in the discount rates charged in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.

Interest expenseincome increased 22.6%31.5% to $28.5$9.8 million in fiscal 2005 from $23.22007 compared to $7.4 million in fiscal 2004.2006. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to additional working capital requirements resulting from higher sales volume, as well as a higher interest rate environment in the U.S. inincome during fiscal 20052007 compared to fiscal 2004.2006 is primarily attributable to higher interest rates earned on short-term cash investments and higher average investment balances compared to the prior fiscal year. Interest income decreased 15.7%increased 32.5% to $7.4 million in fiscal 2006 from $5.6 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in interest income during fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 from $6.7was primarily attributable to higher interest rates earned on short-term cash investments compared to the prior fiscal year.

We realized a net foreign currency exchange gain of $0.1 million in fiscal 2004. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in cash available for investment in fiscal 2005 as2007 compared to fiscal 2004.

We realized a net foreign currency exchange loss of $1.8 million during fiscal 2006 and a net foreign currency exchange gainsgain of $3.0 million and $1.9 million duringin fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.2005. We recognize net foreign currency exchange gains and losses primarily due to the fluctuation in the value of the U.S. dollar versus the euro, and to a lesser extent, versus other currencies. It continues to be our goal to minimize foreign currency exchange gains and losses through an effective hedging program. Our hedging policy prohibits speculative foreign currency exchange transactions.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate for continuing operations was (122.2)% in fiscal 2007 and 82.6% in fiscal 2006 and 24.6% in fiscal 2005.2006. The increasechange in the effective tax rate during fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 is primarily the result of a $56.0the previously discussed goodwill impairment in Europe of $136.1 million, which is non-deductible for tax purposes, and an increase in net operating losses in certain tax jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was recognized. Additionally, we recorded an increase in the deferred tax valuation allowance onrelated to certain jurisdictions in Europe of $8.4 million and $56.0 million in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to net operating losses recorded in previous years. On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes decreased 49.1% to $55.5 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $109.0 million in fiscal 2006 primarily as a result of the decrease in the adjustment to the deferred tax assets recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 related to deferred tax assets for specific jurisdictions in EMEA, primarily Germany. asset valuation allowance.

While we believe theour restructuring efforts will improve the operating performance within our GermanEuropean operations, we have determined this chargethe respective increases in the valuation allowances on deferred tax assets in fiscal 2007 and 2006 to be appropriate due to cumulative

losses expected to be realized throughwithin the currentrespective fiscal year,years, after considering the effect of implementing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the future, toTo the extent we generate future consistent taxable income within those operations currently requiring the valuation allowance, we may reduce the valuation allowance on the related deferred tax assets, thereby reducing tax expense and increasing net income in the same period. The underlying net operating loss carryforwards remain available to offset future taxable income in the specific jurisdictions requiring the valuation allowance, subject to applicable tax laws and regulations. Excluding the effect of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, our

Our effective tax rate for continuing operations would have approximated 40.2% forwas 82.6% in fiscal 2006.2006 and 24.6% in fiscal 2005. The increase in the effective tax rate from 30.0% induring fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 (adjusted for the reversal of previously accrued income taxes as discussed below) to 40.2% in fiscal 2006 wasis primarily the result of annual losses incurredthe previously mentioned $56.0 million increase in certainthe valuation allowance on deferred tax jurisdictions where we are not able to record a tax benefit.assets. On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes increased 109.5% to $109.0 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to $52.0 million in fiscal 2005 primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.

Our effective tax rate for continuing operations was 24.6% in fiscal 2005 compared to 30.5% in fiscal 2004. The decreaseincrease in the effectivedeferred tax rate is primarily attributable to the reversal of previously accrued income taxes of $11.5 million due to the

- 23 -

favorable resolution of various income tax examinations during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Excluding the reversal of previously accrued income taxes, our effective tax rate for continuing operations would have approximated 30.0% during fiscal 2005. On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes increased 10.6% to $52.0 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to $47.0 million in fiscal 2004, primarily due to an increase in our taxable income and the factors discussed above.valuation allowance.

The effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% during these periods primarily for the reasons discussed above, as well asnet operating losses in certain tax jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was recognized and tax rate benefits of certain earnings from operations in certain lower-tax jurisdictions throughout the world for which no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the U.S.

The overall effective tax rate is dependent upon the geographic distribution of our worldwide earnings or losses and changes in tax laws or interpretations of these laws in our operating jurisdictions. We regularly monitor the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective tax rate and adjust our estimates accordingly. If actual results differ from our estimates, future income tax expense could be materially affected.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by lower earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we havewith lower statutory rates, changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, our income tax returns are subject to continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. At January 31, 2006,2007, we believe we have appropriately accrued for probable income tax exposures. To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, our effective tax rate in a financial reporting period could be materially affected.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

ResultsThe results of operations forand the gain on sale of the Training Business have been reclassified and presented as income (loss) from discontinued“discontinued operations, net of tax,tax”, within the Consolidated Statement of Operations for all periods presented. WeFor fiscal 2007, we realized income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $3.9 million, comprised of a $3.8 million gain, net of tax, on the sale of the Training Business and $0.1 million of income from operations of the Training Business prior to the sale in March 2006. We realized $3.6 million and $2.8 million in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively, and a lossof income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $3.0 million in fiscal 2004.2006 and 2005, respectively.

Impact of Inflation

We haveFor the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we do not been adversely affected by inflation. Management believesbelieve that most price increases could be passedinflation had a material impact on to our customers, as prices charged by us are not set by long-term contracts; however, as a result of competitive pressure, there can be no assurance that the full effect of any such price increases could be passedconsolidated operations or on to our customers.financial position.

Quarterly Data—Seasonality

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future as a result of currency fluctuations and seasonal variations in the demand for the products and services we offer. Narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of these factors on our operating results. Recent historical seasonal variations have included a reduction of demand in EMEAEurope during our second and third fiscal quarters followed by an increase in EMEAEuropean demand during our fiscal fourth quarter. Given that a significant portion of our revenues are derived from EMEA,Europe, the worldwide results closely follow the seasonality trends in EMEA.Europe. Additionally, the life cycles of major products, as well as the impact of future acquisitions and dispositions, may also materially impact our business, financial condition, or results of operations. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our quarterly results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our discussion of liquidity and capital resources includes an analysis of our cash flows and capital structure, which includes both continuing and discontinued operations for all periods presented. The absence of cash flows from discontinued operations is not expected to affect the Company’s future liquidity.

- 24 -

The following table summarizes Tech Data’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):2005:

Net cash used in operating activities was $14.0 million for fiscal 2007 compared to $257.4 million cash provided by operating activities increasedoperations in fiscal 2006 as compared to2006. The $14.0 million cash used in operations in fiscal 20052007 was due primarily to the timing of cash received from customers and the timing of payments to vendors. In addition, our operating cash flows in fiscal 2007 were influenced by higher accounts receivable balances due to an acceleration of revenue growth in Europe in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the same period of fiscal 2006. We have several key metrics we use to manage our working capital, including our cash conversion cycle (also referred to as “net cash days”) and owned inventory levels. Our net cash days are defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”) plus days of supply on hand in inventory (“DOS”), less days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”). Owned inventory is calculated as the difference between our inventory and accounts payable balances divided into the inventory balance. Our net cash days remained relatively consistent at 30 days at the end of fiscal 2007 compared to 29 days at the end of fiscal 2006. Our owned inventory level (the percentage of inventory not financed by vendors) was a negative 29% at the end of fiscal 2007, meaning our accounts payable balances exceeded our inventory balances by 29%. This compares to negative owned inventory of 25% at the end of fiscal 2006.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $257.4 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to $106.9 million in fiscal 2005 due primarily to the timing of payments to vendors. Our net cash days improved by approximately 6% to 29 days at the end of fiscal 2006 compared to 31 days at the end of fiscal 2005, resulting from improved management of our worldwide cash conversion cycle. Our owned inventory level (the percentage of inventory not financed by vendors) was a negative 25% at the end of fiscal 2006, meaning our accounts payable balances exceeded our inventory balances by 25%.2006. This comparescompared to negative owned inventory of 18% at the end of fiscal 2005.

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 due primarily to the timing of payments to vendors, offset in part by increased earnings over the prior year (especially within our EMEA segment). Our net cash days improved by approximately 6% to 31 days at the end of fiscal 2005 compared to 33 days at the end of fiscal 2004, resulting from improved management of our worldwide cash conversion cycle. Our owned inventory level was a negative 18% at the end of fiscal 2005 compared to negative owned inventory of 24% at the end of fiscal 2004.

The following table presents the components of Tech Data’s cash conversion cycle, in days, as of January 31, 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004:2005:

Net cash used in investing activities of $23.7 million during fiscal 2007 was primarily due to $43.7 million of expenditures for the continuing expansion and upgrading of our IT systems, office facilities and equipment for our logistics centers, offset by $16.5 million proceeds received from the sale of the Training Business and $3.6 million of proceeds from the sale of property and equipment. We expect to make total capital expenditures of approximately $40.0 million during fiscal 2008 for equipment and machinery in our logistics centers, office facilities and IT systems.

Net cash used in investing activities of $51.6 million during fiscal 2006 was primarily attributable to the continuing investment related to the expansion and upgrading of our IT systems, office facilities and equipment for our logistics centers. We expect to make total capital expenditures

Net cash provided by financing activities of approximately $60.0$121.8 million during fiscal 2007 for equipment and machinery in our logistics centers, office facilities and IT systems. While we believe we will realize increased operating efficiencies as ais primarily the result of these investments, unforeseen circumstances or complexities could have an adverse impactnet proceeds of $342.6 million received from the issuance of $350.0 million of convertible debentures in December 2006, $25.2 million in proceeds received for the reissuance of treasury stock related to exercises of equity-based awards and purchases made through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), offset by $166.4 million of net repayments on our business.

Net cash used in investing activitiesrevolving credit lines and long-term debt and the use of $38.6$80.1 million during fiscal 2005 was attributable tofor the continuing investment related to the expansion and upgradingrepurchase of 2,222,720 shares of our IT systems, office facilities and equipment for our logistics centers, offset by the proceeds from the sale of one of the facilities at our headquarters campus in Clearwater, Florida.common stock.

Net cash used in financing activities of $235.4 million during fiscal 2006 reflectsis primarily the $290.0 millionresult of the repayment of our $290.0 million convertible subordinated debentures $1.6 million of payments on other long-term debt and $127.0 million for the repurchase of 3,443,131 shares of our common stock, partially offset by net borrowings on our revolving credit lines of $166.5 million and $16.7 million in proceeds received for the issuance of common stock related to our stock option exercises and purchases made through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).ESPP.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $12.2 million during fiscal 2005 reflects $32.7 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases made through our ESPP, partially offset by net repayments on our revolving credit lines and long-term debt of $20.5 million.

As of January 31, 2006,2007, we maintained a $400.0 million Receivables Securitization Program with a syndicate of banks, which expires in August 2006.banks. We pay interest (average rate(rate of 4.72%5.70% at January 31, 2006)2007) on the Receivables Securitization Program at designated commercial paper rates plus an agreed-upon margin. Additionally, we maintained a $250.0 million Multi-currency

- 25 -

Revolving Credit Facility with a syndicate of banks that expires in March 2010. We pay interest (average rate(rate of 5.50%6.32% at January 31, 2006)2007) under this facility at the applicable euroLIBOR rate plus a margin based on our credit ratings. In addition to these credit facilities, we maintained lines of credit and overdraft facilities totaling approximately $674.7$787.4 million at January 31, 20062007 (average interest rate on the borrowing was 3.49%4.37% at January 31, 2006)2007).

The total capacity of the aforementioned credit facilities was approximately $1.3$1.4 billion, of which $235.1$77.2 million was outstanding at January 31, 2006.2007. Our credit agreements contain limitations on the amounts of annual dividends and repurchases of common stock. Additionally, the credit agreements require compliance with certain warranties and covenants on a continuing basis.covenants. The financial ratio covenants contained within the credit agreements include a debt to capitalization ratio, an interest to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation and amortization) ratio, and a tangible net worth requirement. At January 31, 2006,2007, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The ability to draw funds under these credit facilities is dependent upon sufficient collateral (in the case of the Receivables Securitization Program) and meeting the aforementioned financial covenants, which may limit our ability to draw the full amount of these facilities. As of January 31, 2006,2007, the maximum amount that could be borrowed under these facilities, in consideration of the availability of collateral and the financial covenants, was approximately $1.1 billion.$750.1 million.

On March 20, 2007, we amended the $250.0 million Multi-currency Revolving Credit Facility, the Receivables Securitization Program and the synthetic lease facility we have with a group of financial institutions (the “Synthetic Lease”), further discussed below. The primary purpose of these amendments was to obtain more favorable interest rates, lease rates and facility fees. In addition, the maturity date of the Multi-currency Revolving Credit Facility was extended to March 20, 2012.

At January 31, 2006,2007, we had issued standby letters of credit of $22.4$25.5 million. These letters of credit typically act as a guarantee of payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. The issuance of these letters of credit reduces our available capacity under the above mentioned facilities by the same amount.

In December 2001,2006, we issued $290.0$350.0 million of convertible subordinatedsenior debentures due 2021.2026. The debentures borebear interest at 2%2.75% per year. We will pay interest on the debentures on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2007. In addition, beginning with the period commencing on December 20, 2011 and wereending on June 15, 2012 and for each six-month period thereafter, we will pay contingent interest on the interest payment date for the applicable interest period, if the market price of the debentures exceeds specified levels. The convertible senior debentures are convertible into our common stock and cash anytime after June 15, 2026, or i) if the market price of the common stock, exceeded a specified percentageas defined, exceeds 135% of the conversion price per share of common stock.stock, or ii) if the Company calls the debentures for redemption, or iii) upon the occurrence of certain corporate transactions, as defined. Holders hadhave the right to convert the debentures into 18.4310 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures, equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $54.26 per share. Upon conversion, we will deliver cash equal to the lesser of the aggregate principal amount of the debentures to be converted and our total conversion obligation and shares of our common stock in respect of the remainder, if any, of our conversion obligation. Holders have the option to require us to repurchase the debentures in cash on specifiedany of the fifth, tenth or fifteenth anniversary dates from the issue date at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the repurchase date. We had the option to satisfy such repurchases in either cash and/or our common stock, provided that shares of common stock reached a certain fair market value. The debentures wereare redeemable in whole or in part for cash at our option at any time on or after December 20, 2005.2011. Additionally, the debentures were subordinatedare senior, unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The debentures are effectively subordinated to all of our senior indebtedness were effectivelyexisting and future secured debt and are structurally subordinated to allthe indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. The proceeds from the offering were used to payoff short-term debt and for other general corporate purposes.

In December 2004, we completed an Exchange Offer whereby approximately 99.3% of our then outstanding $290.0 million convertible subordinated debentures (the “Old Notes”) were exchanged for new debentures (the “New Notes”). The New Notes had substantially identical terms to the previously outstanding Old Notes. As the holders of both the New Notes and the Old Notes had the option to require us to repurchase the debentures on certain dates, beginning with December 15, 2005, we classified the debentures as a current liability at January 31, 2005.

In accordance with the debenture agreement, on December 15, 2005, the debenture holders of the New Notes exercised their option to require the Company to repurchase the debentures. We repurchased the New Notes using cash and existing credit lines. In addition, prior to January 31, 2006, we also repurchased the Old Notes using cash and existing credit lines.

In August 2000,May 2006, we filed awithdrew our $500.0 million universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for $500.0as we made the decision not to issue debt or equity securities through this registration statement.

In fiscal 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $200.0 million of debtour common stock. Share repurchases under the program were made on the open market through block trades or otherwise. The number of shares purchased and equity securities. The net proceeds from any issuancethe timing of the purchases was based on working capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities. Shares we repurchase are expected to be usedheld in treasury for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures,issuances under employee equity incentive plans. During fiscal 2007, we repurchased 2,222,720 shares comprised of 2,220,132 shares purchased in conjunction with our share repurchase program and 2,588 shares purchased outside of the repayment or refinancingstock repurchase program, at an average of debt and to meet working capital needs.$36.03 per share, for a total cost, including expenses, of $80.1 million. As of JanuaryOctober 31, 2006, we have not issued any debt or equity securities under this registration statement, nor can any assurances be given that we will issue any debt or equity securities under this registration statementthe share repurchase program authorized in the future.fiscal 2006 was completed.

Our debt to capital ratio was 12%21% at January 31, 2006.2007. We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash resources and cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with funds available under our credit arrangements, will provide sufficient resources to meet our present and future working capital and cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. Changes in our credit rating or other market factors may increase our interest expense or other costs of capital, or capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms to fund our working capital needs. The Company will continue to need additional financing, including debt financing. The inability to obtain such sources of capital could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company’s credit facilities contain various financial and other covenants that may limit the Company’s ability to borrow or limit the Company’s flexibility in responding to business conditions.

- 26 -

Contractual Obligations

Principal maturitiesAs of January 31, 2007, future payments of long-term debt comprised exclusively of capital leases, at January 31, 2006 and amounts due under future minimum lease payments, including minimum commitments under IT outsourcing agreements, are as followfollows (in thousands):

Fair value renewal and purchase options and escalation clauses exist for a substantial portion of the operating leases included above. Purchase orders for the purchase of inventory and other goods and services are not included in the table above. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders typically represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on Tech Data and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are based on our current demand expectations and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant non-cancelable agreements for the purchase of inventory or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements for the next three months. We also enter into contracts for outsourced services; however, the obligations under these contracts were not significant and the contracts generally contain clauses allowing for cancellation without significant penalty.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Synthetic Lease Facility

On July 31, 2003, we completedWe have a restructuring of our synthetic leaseSynthetic Lease facility with a group of financial institutions (the “Restructured Lease”) under which we lease certain logistics centers and office facilities from a third-party lessor. The RestructuredSynthetic Lease expires in fiscal 2008,2009, at which time we have the following options: renew the lease for an additional five years, purchase the properties at an amount equal to their cost, or remarket the properties. If we elect to remarket the properties, we have guaranteed the lessor a percentage of the cost of each of the properties, in an aggregate amount of approximately $121.0$118.0 million (the “residual value”). At any time during the lease term, we may, at our option purchase up to four of the seven properties, at an amount equal to each property’s cost. We pay interest on the RestructuredSynthetic Lease at LIBOR plus an agreed-upon margin. The RestructuredSynthetic Lease contains covenants that must be complied with, on a continuous basis, similar to the covenants described in certain of the credit facilities discussed above and in Note 78 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The amount funded under the Restructured

Synthetic Lease (approximately $136.7$133.2 million at January 31, 2006)2007) is treated as debt under the definition of the covenants required under both the RestructuredSynthetic Lease and the credit facilities. As of January 31, 2006,2007, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

In January 2007, we sold approximately 6 acres of excess land located in Miami, Florida. The sale was executed pursuant to the “excess sale” provisions of the Synthetic Lease agreement and resulted in a gain of $3.6 million recorded during the quarter ended January 31, 2007. This gain is included within SG&A our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The sum of future minimum lease payments under the RestructuredSynthetic Lease at January 31, 20062007 was approximately $20.9$13.5 million. Properties leased under the RestructuredSynthetic Lease facility total 2.5 million square feet of space, with land totaling 204approximately 198 acres located in Clearwater and Miami, Florida; Fort Worth, Texas; Fontana, California; Suwanee, Georgia; Swedesboro, New Jersey; and South Bend, Indiana.

The RestructuredSynthetic Lease has been accounted for as an operating lease. FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46 requires us to evaluate whether an entity with which we are involved meets the criteria of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and, if so, whether we are required to consolidate that entity. We have determined that the third-party lessor of this synthetic lease facility does not meet the criteria of a VIE and, therefore, is not subject to the consolidation provisions of FIN No. 46.

- 27 -

Trade Receivables Purchase Facility Agreements

During fiscal 2006, we entered intoWe have revolving trade receivables purchase facility agreements (the “Receivables Facilities”) with third-party financial institutions to sell accounts receivable on a non-recourse basis. We use the Receivables Facilities as a source of working capital funding. The Receivables Facilities limit the amount of purchased accounts receivable the financial institutions may hold to $346.0$356.1 million at January 31, 2006,2007, based on the foreign currency exchange raterates at that date. Under the Receivables Facilities, we may sell certain accounts receivable (the “Receivables”) in exchange for cash less a discount based on LIBOR plus a margin. Such transactions have been accounted for as a true sale, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities”. The Receivables Facilities, of which $200.0 million expires in May 2006 and $146.0 million does not have anvarious expiration date,dates, require that we continue to service, administer and collect the sold accounts receivable.

During the year ended January 31,fiscal 2007 and 2006, we received gross proceeds of $1.3 billion and $796.1 million, respectively, from the sale of the Receivables and recognized related discounts totaling $12.5 million and $5.5 million.million, respectively. The proceeds, net of the discount incurred, are reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in operating activities within cash received from customers and the change in accounts receivable. Prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company did not utilize the Receivables Facilities as a source of funding.

Guarantees

As is customary in the IT industry, to encourage certain customers to purchase product from us, we have arrangements with certain finance companies that provide inventory-financing facilities for our customers. In conjunction with certain of these arrangements, we have agreements with the finance companies that would require us to repurchase certain inventory, which might be repossessed from the customers by the finance companies. Due to various reasons, including among other items, the lack of information regarding the amount of saleable inventory purchased from us still on hand with the customer at any point in time, our repurchase obligations relating to inventory cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by us under these arrangements have been insignificant to date. We also provide additional financial guarantees to finance companies on behalf of certain customers. The majority of these guarantees are for an indefinite period of time, where we would be required to perform if the customer is in default with the finance company. The Company reviews the underlying credit for these guarantees on at least an annual basis. As of January 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, the aggregate amount of guarantees under these arrangements totaled approximately $7.0$11.5 million and $9.7$7.0 million, respectively, of which approximately $2.9$7.0 million and $5.3$2.9 million, respectively, was outstanding. We believe that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to both of the above guarantees is remote.

Additionally, in connection with the sale of the Training Business discussed in Note 3—Discontinued Operations, we continue to negotiate the assignment of several of the related facility lease obligations with the lessors of such properties. To the extent the lessors are unwilling to agree to a direct lease arrangement with the purchaser, we will remain liable in the event of default by the purchaser of the Training Business. The majority of these lease obligations expire at various dates over the next three years and would require that we make all required payments under the lease agreements in the event of default by the purchaser. The maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) that we could be required to make under the guarantees is approximately $8.2 million as of January 31, 2007. We believe that the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to these guarantees is remote.

We also provide residual value guarantees related to our RestructuredSynthetic Lease which have been recorded at the estimated fair value of the residual value guarantees.

Asset Management

We manage our inventories by maintaining sufficient quantities to achieve high order fill rates while attempting to stock only those products in high demand with a rapid turnover rate. Inventory balances fluctuate as we add new product lines and when appropriate, we make large purchases, including cash purchases from manufacturers and publishers when the terms of such purchases are considered advantageous. Our contracts with most of our vendors provide price protection and stock rotation privileges to reduce the risk of loss due to manufacturer price reductions and slow moving or obsolete inventory. In the event of a vendor price reduction, we generally receive a credit for the impact on products in inventory and we have the right to rotate a certain percentage of purchases, subject to certain limitations. Historically, price protection and stock rotation privileges as well as our inventory management procedures have helped to reduce the risk of loss of inventory value.

We attempt to control losses on credit sales by closely monitoring customers’ creditworthiness through our IT systems, which contain detailed information on each customer’s payment history and other relevant information. We have obtained credit insurance that insures a percentage of the credit extended by us to certain customers against possible loss. Customers who qualify for credit terms are typically granted net 30-day payment terms in the Americas. While credit terms in EMEAEurope vary by country, the vast majority of customers are granted credit terms ranging from 30-60 days. We also sell products on a prepay, credit card and cash on delivery basis. In addition, certain of the Company’s vendors subsidize floorplan financing arrangements for the benefit of our customers.

ITEM 7A.Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a large global organization, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material impact on our financial results in the future. In the normal course of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies using a variety of financial instruments. It is our policy to utilize financial instruments to reduce risks where internal netting cannot be effectively employed. Additionally, we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Our primary exposure relates to transactions in EMEA,Europe, where the currency collected from customers can be different from the currency used to purchase the product. Our foreign currency risk management objective is to protect our earnings and cash flows from the adverse impact of exchange rate changes.

- 28 -

Foreign exchange risk is managed by using foreign currency forward, option and swap contracts to hedge both intercompany and third party a) loans, b) accounts receivable and c) accounts payable.

We have elected not to designate our foreign currency contracts as hedging instruments, and they are therefore marked-to-market with changes in their value recorded in the income statementConsolidated Statement of Operations each period. TheDuring fiscal 2007 and 2006, the underlying exposures are denominated primarily in the following currencies: U.S. dollar, British pound, Canadian dollar, Czech koruna, Danish krone, euros,euro, Norwegian krone, Polish zloty, Swedish krona and Swiss franc.

The following table provides information about our foreign currency derivative financial instruments outstanding as of January 31, 20062007 and 2005.2006. The information is provided in U.S. dollar equivalents. For the foreign currency contracts, the table presents the notional amount (at contractual exchange rates) and the weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rates. These contracts are generally for durations of 90 days or less.

Foreign Currency Contracts

Notional Amounts by Expected Maturity

Average Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Rate

(Dollar amounts in millions, except weighted average contract rates)