UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended April 28, 200726, 2008

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to

Commission File No. 0-20572

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Minnesota 41-0886515

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1031 Mendota Heights Road

St. Paul, Minnesota 55120

(Address of principal executive offices including Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (651) 686-1600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NoneCommon Stock, par value $.01

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange ActAct.

Large Accelerated Fileraccelerated filer  x            Accelerated Filer  filer  ¨                     Non-Accelerated Filer               Non-accelerated filer  ¨             Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 27, 2006,2007, was approximately $4,590,000,000.$4,948,000,000. (For purposes of this calculation all of the registrant’s officers, directors, presidents of operating units and 10% owners known to the Company are deemed affiliates of the registrant.)

As of June 25, 2007,23, 2008, there were 139,569,362121,335,179 shares of Common Stock of the registrant issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Certain portions of the document listed below have been incorporated by reference into the indicated part of this Form 10-K.

 

Document Incorporated

    Part of Form 10-K

Proxy Statement for 20072008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

    Part III

 



FORM 10-K INDEX

 

   Page

PART I

  3

Item 1.

  

BUSINESS

  3

Item 1A.

  

RISK FACTORS

  2425

Item 1B.

  

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

  26

Item 2.

  

PROPERTIES

  26

Item 3.

  

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

  27

Item 4.

  

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

  28

PART II

  29

Item 5.

  

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

  29

Item 6.

  

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

  31

Item 7.

  

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  32

Item 7A.

  

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

  4243

Item 8.

  

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

  4344

Item 9.

  

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

  6872

Item 9A.

  

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

  6872

Item 9B.

  

OTHER INFORMATION

  6973

PART III

  7074

Item 10.

  

DIRECTORS, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTAND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  7074

Item 11.

  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  7074

Item 12.

  

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

  7074

Item 13.

  

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

  7074

Item 14.

  

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

  7074

PART IV

  7175

Item 15.

  

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

  7175

SIGNATURES

  7478

SCHEDULE II

  7579

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

  7680

PART I

 

Item 1.BUSINESS

Certain information of a non-historical nature contained in Items 1, 2, 3 and 7 of this Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. Reference is made to Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors that May Affect Future Operating Results, for a discussion of certain factors that could cause the Company’s actual operating results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.

General

In June 2004, the Company changed its corporate name from Patterson Dental Company to Patterson Companies, Inc. (“Patterson” or the “Company”). Patterson retained its existing Nasdaq stock symbol—PDCO. The corporate name change was adopted to reflect Patterson’s expanding base of business, which now encompasses the veterinary and rehabilitation supply markets, as well as its traditional base of operations in the dental supply market. Patterson’s operating units include Patterson Dental, Webster Veterinary and Patterson Medical, formerly known as AbilityOne Products Corp.Medical.

Patterson is a value-added distributor serving three major markets:

 

North American dental supply;

 

U.S. companion-pet (dogs, cats and other common household pets) and equine veterinary supply;

 

and the worldwide rehabilitation and non-wheelchair assistive products supply market.

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Patterson or the Company include its subsidiaries: Patterson Dental Holdings, Inc., Direct Dental Supply Co., Patterson Dental Canada Inc., Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc., PDC Funding Company, LLC, PDC Funding Company II, LLC, Patterson Technology Center, Inc., Patterson Office Supplies, Inc., Webster Management LP, Intra Corp., Patterson Medical Holdings, Inc., Patterson Medical Supply, Inc., Sammons Preston Canada, Inc., AO Liquidation, Inc., Tumble Forms, Inc., Midland Manufacturing Company Inc., Patterson Logistics Services, Inc., Accu-Bite, Inc., Accu-Bite Dental Products Limited Liability Company, Williamston Industrial Center, LLC, Strategic Dental Marketing, Inc., AbilityOne Homecraft Limited, AbilityOne Limited, AbilityOne Kinetec S. A., AOC Vertriebs GmbH,SA, Theraquip, Inc., Metro Medical, Inc., and Dale Surgical Professional Supply, Inc.Advance Practice Systems LLC.

Patterson began distributing dental supplies in 1877. The modern history of the business dates to May 1985, when the Company’s management and certain investors purchased the Company from a subsidiary of The Beatrice Companies, Inc. Patterson became a publicly traded company in October 1992. The Company is a corporation organized under the laws of Minnesota.

The Company historically reported under one operating segment, dental supply. In July 2001, the Company purchased the veterinary supply assets of J. A. Webster, Inc., which became a reportable business segment. Then in September 2003, the Company acquired Patterson Medical (formerly AbilityOne Products Corp.), creating a third business segment which serves the rehabilitation supply market.

The Company’s three reportable segments, dental supply, veterinary supply and rehabilitation supply, are strategic business units that offer similar products and services to different customer bases. Each business is a market leader with a strong competitive position, serves a fragmented market that offers consolidation opportunities and offers relatively low-cost consumable supplies, making the Company’s value-added business proposition highly attractive to customers.

Shared Services Initiative

To streamline Patterson’s cost structure, we continuethe Company continues to consolidate ourits distribution infrastructure and business systems. With respect to ourthe distribution infrastructure, in late fiscal 2005 we opened a facility in

Columbia, SC was opened that replaced the individual dental and veterinary distribution centers that were serving this region. In fiscal 2006, we consolidated separate dental and veterinary facilities in Seattle, WA were consolidated into a new shared distribution center. In addition, we began stocking certain high-volume Patterson Medical inventory was being stocked at shared distribution facilities in Dinuba, CA, Jacksonville, FL and Fort Worth, TX.

During fiscal 2007, we opened a new distribution center in eastern Pennsylvania was opened that replaced nearby, separate dental and veterinary facilities. Patterson Medical moved into this new distribution center and closed its former primary distribution facility in Bolingbrook, IL. We expect

In fiscal 2008, the Company began to beginexpand the modification of another existing facility thatin Dinuba, CA. In fiscal 2009, this location will accommodate products for multiplebe the second in the distribution system to service customers of all three business units during fiscal 2008.units.

The first shared sales branch office location haslocations have been established in northern California and the Company plans to add sharedleverage additional branch facilitieslocations by sharing between two or three business units in select markets during fiscal 2008.2009.

Dental Supply

Overview

As Patterson’s largest business, Patterson Dental is one of the two largest distributors of dental products in North America. The business has operations in the United States and Canada. Patterson Dental, a full-service, value-added supplier to dentists, dental laboratories, institutions, and other healthcare professionals, provides: consumable products (including x-ray film, restorative materials, hand instruments and sterilization products); basic and advanced technology dental equipment; practice management and clinical software; patient education systems; and office forms and stationery. Patterson Dental offers its customers a broad selection of dental products including more than 90,000 stock keeping units (“SKUs”) of which approximately 4,000 are private-label products sold under the Patterson name. Patterson Dental also offers customers a full range of related services including dental equipment installation, maintenance and repair, dental office design and equipment financing. Patterson Dental markets its dental products and services through approximately 1,5501,450 direct sales representatives, 391 of whom are equipment specialists.

Patterson Dental has over 125 years of experience providing quality service to dental professionals. Net sales of this segment have increased from $165.8 million in fiscal 1986 to over $2.0approximately $2.2 billion in fiscal 20072008 and profitability has increased from an operating loss in fiscal 1986 to operating income of $262.4$281.9 million in fiscal 2007.2008.

Patterson estimates the dental supply market it serves to be approximately $6.4$6.8 billion annually and that its share of this market is approximately 32%. The underlying structure of the dental supply market consists of a sizeable geographically dispersed number of fragmented dental practices and is attractive for the Company’s role as a value-added, full-service distributor. According to the American Dental Association, there are over 160,000 dentists practicing in the United States in approximately 135,000 dental practices. In Canada, there are approximately 18,000 licensed dentists according to the Canadian Dental Association. The average general practitioner generated approximately $560,000 in annual revenue in 2003, while the average specialty practitioner produced about $800,000. The Company believes that a dentist uses between 5% and 7% of annual revenue to purchase consumable supplies used in the daily operations of the practice. This translates into between $28,000 and $39,000 of supplies being purchased by the average practice each year. The Company believes the average dental practitioner purchases about 40% of their supplies from their top supplier.

Total expenditures for dental services in the United States increased from $31 billion in 1990 to $84$92 billion in 2006. Domestic dental care expenditures are projected by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to grow 6% annually, reaching $116 billion by the year 2010. The Company believes that the demand for dental services, equipment and supplies will continue to be influenced by the following factors:

 

  

Demographics. The U.S. population grew from 235 million in 1980 to 297302 million in 2005,2007, and is expected to reach 309 million by 2010. The median age of the population is also increasing and the Company believes that older dental patients spend more on a per capita basis for dental services.

  

Dental products and techniques. Technological developments in dental products have contributed to advances in dental techniques and procedures, including cosmetic dentistry and dental implants.

 

  

Demand for certain dental procedures. Demand is growing for preventive dentistry and specialty services such as periodontic (the treatment of gums), endodontic (root canals), orthodontic (braces), and other dental procedures that enable patients to keep their natural teeth longer and improve their appearance.

 

  

Increased dental office productivity. The number of dentists per 100,000 persons in the U.S. is forecasted to decline over the next two decades. As a result, the number of patients per dental practice is expected to grow. For this reason dentists are showing an increased willingness to invest in dental equipment and office infrastructure that can strengthen the productivity of their practices.

 

  

Demand for infection control products. Greater public awareness as well as regulations and guidelines instituted by OSHA, the American Dental Association and state regulatory authorities have resulted in increased use of infection control (asepsis) products such as protective clothing, gloves, facemasks, and sterilization equipment to prevent the spread of communicable diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis and herpes.

 

  

Coverage by dental plans. An increasing number of dental services are being funded by private dental insurance. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services statistics on expenditures for dental services in the United States indicate that private dental insurance paid approximately 50% of the $84$892 billion in total expenditures for 2006.

Strategy

Patterson’s objective is to remain a leading national distributor of supplies, equipment and related services in the market while continuing to improve its profitability and enhance its value to customers. To achieve this objective, Patterson has adopted a strategy of emphasizing its value-added, full-service capabilities, using technology to enhance customer service, continuing to improve operating efficiencies, and growing through internal expansion and acquisitions.

Emphasizing Value-Added, Full-Service Capabilities.Patterson Dental is positioned to meet virtually all of the needs of dental practitioners by providing a full range of consumable supplies, equipment and software, and value-added services. The Company believes that its customers value full service and responsive delivery of quality supplies and equipment. Customers also increasingly expect suppliers to be knowledgeable about products and services, and generally a superior sales representative can create a special relationship with the practitioner by providing an informational link to the overall industry. The Company’s knowledgeable sales representatives assist customers in the selection and purchase of supplies and equipment. In addition, the high quality sales force allows Patterson to offer broader product lines. Since most dental practices lack a significant degree of back office support, the convenience of our full-service capabilities enables dentists to spend more time with patients and, thus, generate additional revenues.

Patterson meets its customer’s requirements by delivering frequent, small quantity orders rapidly and reliably from its strategically located distribution centers. Equipment specialists, technology representatives, and service technicians also support the Company’s value-added strategy in the dental supply market. Equipment specialists offer consultation on office design, equipment requirements and financing. Technology representatives provide guidance on integrating technology solutions including practice management and clinical software, digital radiography, custom hardware and networking into the dental practice. The Company’s experienced service technicians perform equipment installation, maintenance and repair services including services on products not purchased through Patterson.

Using Technology to Enhance Customer Service. As part of its commitment to providing superior customer service, the Company offers its customers easy order placement. The Company has offered electronic ordering

capability to its dental supply segment since 1987 when it first introduced Remote Order Entry (REMOSM). The Company believes that its computerized order entry systems help to establish relationships with new customers and increase loyalty among existing customers. The remote order entry systems permit customers to place orders from their offices directly to Patterson 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Over the years, the Company has continued to introduce new order entry systems designed to meet the varying needs of its customers. Today the Company offers four systems to the dental supply segment, eMAGINE®, REMOSM, PDXpress® and www.pattersondental.com. Customers, as well as the Company’s sales force, use these systems. Over the years, the number of orders transmitted electronically has grown steadily to approximately 65% of Patterson’s consumable dental product volume or $750$790 million in fiscal year 2007.2008.

In fiscal 2002, the Company introduced its newest order entry system, eMAGINE®. eMAGINE® has become the standard platform for the sales representative and includes many new features and upgrades including: up to three years of order history for the customer’s reference, faster searches for products and reports, order tracking, instant information on monthly product specials, descriptions and photographs of popular products and an electronic custom catalog, including a printable version with scannable bar codes.

For those dental customers not using eMAGINE®, the Company offers two alternative order entry products. REMOSM gives customers direct and immediate ordering access through a personal computer to a database containing Patterson’s complete inventory. PDXpress® is a handheld order entry system that eliminates handwritten order forms by permitting a user to scan a product bar code from an inventory tag system or from Patterson’s bar-coded catalog. These systems, including eMAGINE®, are provided at no additional charge to customers who maintain certain minimum purchase requirements.

The goal of the Company’s Internet strategy is to distribute information and service related products over the Internet to enhance customers’ practices and to increase sales force productivity. The Company’s Internet environment includes order entry, access to “Patterson Today” articles and manufacturers’ product information. Additionally, Patterson utilizes a tool, InfoSource, to provide real time customer and Company information to the Company’s sales force, managers and vendors via the Internet.

In addition to enhancing customer service, by offering electronic order entry systems to its customers, the Company enables its sales representatives to spend more time with existing customers and to call on additional customers.

The Company’s proprietary practice management and clinical software, EagleSoft®, is developed and maintained by the Patterson Technology Center (PTC). The Company believes the PTC differentiates Patterson Dental from the competition by positioning Patterson Dental as the only company providing a single-source solution for the high-growth area of digital radiography. This technology, which we expectthe Company expects to be installed eventually in most dental offices, has a current market penetration of approximately 30%. Among its many specialized capabilities, the PTC provides system configuration, as well as the seamless integration of all digital operatory components with clinical software, including our EagleSoft® line. This integration creates an electronic patient database that combines the patient’s front office record with digital information from the clinical x-ray, intra-oral camera, CEREC and other digital equipment. The PTC also will network the digital x-ray system throughout the entire office and provide all required custom computer hardware for the system. In addition, the PTC provides installation and customer training, as well as a call center for troubleshooting customer problems and arranging for local service.

Software and digital radiography customers also have access to the support capabilities of the PTC. The PTC provides support for our proprietary products as well as select branded product from our manufacturers. In addition to troubleshooting problems through its customer call center, the PTC designs and configures local area networks and assembles custom hardware. The PTC also develops and supports the Company’s order entry systems.

Continuing to Improve Operating Efficiencies. Patterson continues to implement programs designed to improve operating efficiencies and allow for continued sales growth over time. These programs include a wide

variety of initiatives from investing in management information systems to consolidating distribution centers. Recent initiatives include upgrading the Company’s communications architecture, developing a new technical service system, and implementation of the shared services concept.

The Company has improved operating efficiencies by converting its communications architecture to faster, higher capacity data lines that combine voice and data transmissions while reducing overall communication costs. The Company has made substantial progress in the development of a new field service management tool for its technical service operations. This new tool will allow the Company to fundamentally change its technical service business processes, improving the Company’s ability to coordinate the actions of its service technicians and enhancing customer service while reducing the overall cost of operations.

An integral part of the Company’s shared services concept is the consolidation and leveraging of distribution centers between the segments of the Company, which began in fiscal 2005. As of April 2007,2008, the dental segment shares six distribution centers with one or both of the other operating units. In addition, the Company has begun to establish shared sales branch office locations between multiple segments, with the first location established in northern California.California in late fiscal 2007. As a result of these and other efforts, the Company expects to continue to improve its operating leverage and efficiencies going forward.

Growing Through Internal Expansion and Acquisitions. The Company intends to continue to grow by opening additional sales offices, hiring established sales representatives, hiring and training college graduates as territory sales representatives, and acquiring other distributors in order to enter new markets and expand its customer base. The Company believes that it is well positioned to take advantage of expected continued consolidation in the dental distribution market. Over the past 1920 years the Company has made a number of acquisitions, including the following:

Dental distribution acquisitions in the United States

 

In August 1987, Patterson acquired the D.L. Saslow Co., which at the time was the third largest distributor of dental products in the United States. Between 1989 and 2005, Patterson acquired certain assets of 25 smaller dental dealers throughout the United States. During fiscal 2002, the Company acquired Thompson Dental Company of Columbia, SC, a leading value-added distributor of dental supplies, equipment and services in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern U.S. Thompson ranked among the 10 largest dental distributors in the country. In September 2005, the Company acquired Accu-Bite, Inc., a Michigan-based dental distributor with approximately 60 field sales representatives. In April 2008, a full-service regional distributor serving customers in the northeastern U.S., Leventhal & Sons, Inc., was acquired.

Dental distribution acquisitions in Canada

 

In October 1993, Patterson Dental completed the acquisition of Healthco International, Inc.’s Canadian subsidiary, Healthco Canada, Inc. In August 1997, the Company acquired Canadian Dental Supply Ltd., which expanded the Company’s market share in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario. In July 2002, the Company acquired Distribution Quebec Dentaire, Inc., augmenting the Company’s market share in Quebec. As a combined operation known as Patterson Dental Canada Inc., this subsidiary, which the Company believes is one of the two largest full-service dental products distributors in Canada, employs approximately 495520 people, 130150 of whom are sales representatives.

Printed office products acquisitions

 

In October 1996, Patterson acquired the Colwell Systems division of Deluxe Corporation. Colwell Systems, now known as Patterson Office Supplies, produces and sells a variety of printed office products used in medical, dental and veterinary offices, as well as other clinical based settings.

Software acquisitions

 

 

 

In July 1997, Patterson Dental acquired EagleSoft, Inc., a developer and marketer of Windows®-based practice management and clinical software for dental offices. EagleSoft’s operation, now known as the

 

Patterson Technology Center, is located in Effingham, Illinois. In December 2001, the Company purchased Modern Practice Technologies, a company that provides custom computing solutions to the dental industry. This acquisition helped Patterson to position itself to provide all of the custom hardware and networking required for interfacing the entire dental office.

 

In May 2004, Patterson Dental acquired CAESY Education Systems, Inc., the leading provider of electronic patient education services to dental practices in North America. Headquartered in Vancouver, Washington, CAESY provides dental practices with a range of communications media that educate patients about professional dental care, procedures and treatment alternatives with the goal of influencing patient decisions about dental services and increasing the productivity of the dental professional. Educational materials are communicated through CD/DVD media, computer programs and the dentist’s web site. These materials can be used within the dental waiting room, at chair side and in the patient’s home.

Products and Services

The following table sets forth the sales by principal categories of products and services offered to dental segment customers:

 

   2007  2006  2005 

Consumable and printed products

  56% 55% 54%

Equipment and software

  35  36  37 

Other(1)

  9  9  9 
          

Total

  100% 100% 100%
          

   2008  2007  2006 

Consumable and printed products

  56% 56% 55%

Equipment and software

  34  35  36 

Other(1)

  10  9  9 
          

Total

  100% 100% 100%
          

(1)Consists of other value-added products and services including technical service and software maintenance.

Consumable and Printed Products

Dental Supplies. Patterson offers a broad product line of consumable dental supplies such as x-ray film and solutions; impression materials; restorative materials (composites and alloys); hand instruments; sterilization products; anesthetics; infection control products such as protective clothing, gloves and facemasks; paper, cotton and other disposable products; toothbrushes and a full line of dental accessories including instruments, burs, and diamonds. In addition to representing a wide array of branded products from numerous manufacturers, Patterson also markets its own private label line of dental supplies including anesthetics, instruments, preventive and restorative products, and cotton and paper products. The private label line is used to compliment the branded products where the customer is seeking a lower-cost alternative on a product that has become commoditized in the market. Compared to most name brand supplies, the private label line provides lower prices for the Company’s customers and higher margins for the Company.

Printed Office Products. Patterson Dental provides a variety of printed office products, office filing supplies, and practice management systems to office-based healthcare providers including dental, veterinary and medical offices. Products include custom printed products, insurance and billing forms, stationery, envelopes and business cards, labels, file folders, appointment books and other stock office supply products. Products are sold through two channels:

 

The Company’s dental and veterinary supply sales force

 

Direct mail catalogs distributed to over 100,000 customers several times a year

A staff of telemarketing personnel located in Champaign, Illinois supports both channels. Orders are received by telephone, through the mail or electronically from the dental and veterinary distribution order processing system.

Equipment and Software

Dental Equipment. Patterson Dental is the largest supplier of dental equipment in the U.S. and Canada. It offers a wide range of dental equipment products including x-ray machines, high-and low-speed handpieces, dental chairs, dental handpiece control units, diagnostic equipment, sterilizers, dental lights and compressors. The Company also distributes newer technology equipment that provides customers with the tools to improve productivity and patient satisfaction. Examples of such innovative and high-productivity products include the CEREC® family of products, a chair-side restoration system; digital x-rays; and inter-oral cameras.

Software. Patterson develops and markets its own proprietary line of practice management and clinical software for dental professionals. Products include software for scheduling, billing, charting and capture/storage/retrieval of digital images. The Company also sells software products developed by third parties including Sidexis by Sirona and Dimax2 by Planmeca. These value-added products are designed to help achieve office productivity improvements, which translate into higher profitability for the customer.

Hardware. Patterson Dental offers custom hardware and networking solutions required for integrating the entire dental office. This product offering is available to all of the Company’s dental customers. This initiative marked another step in Patterson’s overall strategy of providing customers with the convenience and cost-effectiveness of a virtually complete range of products and value-added services and is one of the newest components of Patterson’s single-source solution for dental offices.

Patient Education Services. The CAESY Education Systems line of products offers patient education products and services. These communications tools are designed to influence patient decisions about services in an efficient, cost-effective manner.

Other

Software Services. The Company offers a variety of services to complement its software products such as service agreements, software training, electronic claims processing and billing statement processing. These services provide value to customers by allowing them to keep software products current, or receive payments more rapidly while obtaining greater productivity.

Equipment Installation, Repair and Maintenance. To keep their practices running efficiently, dentists require reliable performance from their equipment. All major equipment sold by Patterson includes installation and Patterson’s 90-day labor warranty at no additional charge. Patterson also provides complete repair and maintenance services for all dental equipment, whether or not purchased from Patterson, including 24-hour handpiece repair service. In addition to service technicians who provide installation and repair services on basic dental equipment, the Company has also invested in personnel who specialize in installing and troubleshooting issues with technology solutions such as practice management software, digital imaging products, hardware and networking. The goal of this group, which is comprised of both local service technicians and the Patterson Technology Center, is to help customers integrate newer technology into their dental practices. The Patterson Technology Center helps the customer minimize costly downtime by offering a single point of contact for post-sale technology related issues.

Dental Office Design. Patterson provides dental office layout and design services through the use of a computer-aided design (CAD) program. Equipment specialists can create original or revised dental office designs in a fraction of the time required to produce conventional drawings. Customers purchasing major equipment items receive dental office design services at no additional charge.

Equipment Financing. Patterson Dental provides a variety of options to fulfill its customers’ financing needs. For qualified purchasers of equipment, the Company will arrange financing for the customer through Patterson or a third party. For non-equipment related needs, such as for working capital or real estate, customers are referred to a third party organization. This alternative allows the Company to offer its customers convenience

while still meeting their diverse financing needs. In fiscal 2007,2008, the Company originated over $314nearly $300 million of equipment finance contracts. The Company, or its vendor partner, financed approximately 37%36% of the equipment purchased by customers during fiscal 2007.2008.

Since November 1998, Patterson has maintained one or more finance referral agreements with an outside finance company to provide a more extensive selection of finance opportunities to its customers. This might include financing for practice transactions, working capital, leasing, real estate and long-term capital. Currently this service is provided by GE Healthcare Financial Services. There are no recourse provisions under this agreement. Patterson receives referral fees under this agreement and GE Healthcare Financial extends credit and services the accounts.

Patterson generally does not hold the installment salefinance contracts initiated on equipment transactions. These contracts are sold to either a commercial paper conduit managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., or to a group of banks led by U.S. Bank National Association.

Patterson created a special purpose entity (“SPE”), PDC Funding Company, LLC, a wholly-owned and fully consolidated subsidiary, and entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement in order to participate in the commercial paper conduit. The Company transfers installment salefinance contracts to the SPE. In turn, the SPE sells the contracts to the commercial paper conduit. The limit under this agreement as amended, is $440 million of contract purchases. There is no recourse to the Company for contracts purchased by the commercial paper conduit, but there is a holdback by the conduit equal to 10% of the principal of these contracts.

A second special purpose entity,SPE, PDC Funding Company II, LLC, can sell contracts through a Contract Purchase Agreement to a group of banks led by U.S. Bank. The agreement operates similarly to the Receivables Purchase Agreement described above, except that the holdback is equal to 6% of the principal and the capacity is $110 million.

Patterson services the customer contracts under both of the preceding arrangements for which it receives a fee that approximates its cost for providing the service.

Sales and Marketing

During fiscal 2007,2008, Patterson Dental sold products or services to over 120,000 customers in the U.S. and Canada who made one or more purchases during the year. Patterson Dental’s customers include dentists, laboratories, institutions and other healthcare professionals. No single customer accounted for more than 1% of sales during fiscal 2007,2008, and Patterson is not dependent on any single customer or geographic group of customers. The Company’s sales and marketing efforts are designed to establish and improve customer relationships through personal interaction with its sales representatives and frequent direct marketing contact, which underscores the Company’s value-added approach.

Patterson Dental has over 90 local offices throughout the U.S. and Canada so that it can provide a presence in the market and decision making near the customer. These offices, or branches, are staffed with a complete compliment of Patterson Dental capabilities, including sales, customer service and technical service personnel, as well as a local manager who has broad decision making authority with regard to customer related transactions and issues. The branches are grouped into seven regions in the U.S. and one in Canada.

A primary component of Patterson’s value-added approach is its sales force. Due to the fragmented nature of the dental supply market, Patterson believes that a large sales force is necessary to reach potential customers and to provide full service. Sales representatives provide an informational link to the overall industry; assist practitioners in selecting and purchasing products and help customers efficiently manage their supply inventories. Each sales representative works within an assigned sales territory under the supervision of a location (branch) manager. Sales representatives are all Patterson employees and are generally compensated on a commission basis, with some, less experienced, representatives receiving a base salary and commission.

To assist its sales representatives, Patterson Dental publishes a variety of catalogs and fliers containing product and service information. Dental customers receive a full-line product catalog containing over 30,000 inventoried items. The catalog includes pictures of products, detailed descriptions and specifications of products and is utilized by practitioners as a reference source. Selected consumable supplies, new products, specially priced items and high-demand items such as infection control products are promoted through merchandise fliers printed and distributed bi-monthly to the dental supply market. In addition, dental equipment sold by Patterson is featured in Patterson’s tri-yearly publication,Patterson Today, which also includes articles on dental office design, trends in dental practice, products and services offered by Patterson and information on equipment maintenance.

To enhance the total value it brings to its customers, Patterson Dental created a value-added benefit program for its preferred customers. The Patterson PlusSM program entitles its best dental customers to priority technical services, automated supply management systems at no charge, a variety of product discounts and reduced rates on financial products, practice management software and technical services.

Distribution

Patterson Dental believes that responsive delivery of quality supplies and equipment is a key element to providing complete customer satisfaction. Patterson ships dental consumable supplies from 10eight strategically located distribution centers in the U.S. and Canada. Orders for consumable dental supplies can be placed by telephone or electronically 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Printed office products are shipped from the Company’s manufacturing and distribution facility in Illinois.

All orders are routed through Patterson’s centralized computer ordering, shipping and inventory management systems, which are linked to each of the Company’s strategically located distribution centers. If an item is not available in the distribution center nearest to the customer, the computer system automatically directs shipment of the item from another center. Rapid and accurate order fulfillment is another principal component of the Company’s value-added approach. Patterson Dental estimates that 98% of its consumable goods orders are shipped to the customer on time, which is generally within 24 hours.

In order to assure the availability of Patterson Dental’s broad product lines for prompt delivery to customers, Patterson must maintain sufficient inventories at its distribution centers. Purchasing of consumables and standard equipment is centralized and the purchasing department uses a real-time perpetual inventory system to manage inventory levels. The Company’s inventory consists mostly of consumable supply items. By utilizing its computerized inventory management and ordering systems, the Company is able to accurately predict inventory turns in order to minimize inventory levels for each item.

Patterson Dental’s more than 90 dental sales offices are generally configured with display areas where the latest dental equipment can be demonstrated. Dental equipment is generally custom ordered and is staged at the Company’s sales offices before delivery to dental offices for installation.

Sources of Supply

Effective purchasing is a key strategy the Company has adopted in order to achieve its objective of continuing to improve profitability. The Company has a program to effectuate electronic data interchange (EDI) with its major vendor partners. In fiscal 2007,2008, the Company processed 70% of its invoices from dental vendors using EDI capabilities. In addition, 60% of Patterson’s dental purchase order volume was conducted employing EDI, which represented 65% of dental purchase order dollars placed during the fiscal year. Utilizing EDI allows the Company to improve efficiencies and reduce administrative costs.

Patterson Dental obtains products from approximately 1,100 vendors in the dental segment. Patterson has exclusive distribution agreements with several quality dental equipment manufacturers including Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. for CEREC® dental restorative systems and digital x-rays. The Company is the only national dealer for A-dec equipment, including chairs, units and cabinetry. A-dec is the largest manufacturer of dental equipment in the U.S.

While the Company makes purchases from many suppliers and there is generally more than one source of supply for most of the categories of products sold by the Company, the concentration of business with key suppliers is considerable. The Company’s top ten supply vendors accounted for approximately 41% and 40% of the cost of dental products sold in both fiscal years 20072008 and 2006, respectively.2007. Of these ten, the top two vendors accounted for 9% each of both fiscal 2008 and 8%, and 9% and 9% of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 cost of sales, respectively.sales.

Competition

The highly competitive U.S. dental products distribution industry consists principally of national, regional and local full-service and mail-order distributors. The dental supply market is extremely fragmented. In addition to Patterson and one other national, full-service firm, Sullivan-Schein Dental, a unit of Henry Schein, Inc., there are at least 1918 full-service distributors that operate on a regional level, and hundreds of small local distributors. Also, some manufacturers sell directly to end-users.

The Company approaches its markets by emphasizing and delivering a value-added model to the practitioner. To differentiate itself from its competition it deploys a strategy of premium customer service, a highly qualified and motivated sales force, experienced service technicians, an extensive breadth and mix of products and services, accurate and timely delivery of product, strategic location of sales offices and distribution centers, and competitive pricing.

The Company also experiences competition in Canada in the dental supply market. The principal competitor is a national, full-service dental distributor, Henry Schein Ash Arcona, a unit of Henry Schein, Inc. The Company believes it competes in Canada on essentially the same basis as in the United States.

Veterinary Supply

Overview

Webster Veterinary, or “Webster,” is the leading distributor of veterinary supplies to companion-animal (dogs, cats and other common household pets) veterinary clinics in the eastern United States. Management believes Webster is the second largest distributor of companion-animal veterinary supplies nationally. In addition, through its fiscal 2005 acquisition of Milburn Distributions, Inc., Webster is the leading national equine distributor in the United States. Webster provides products used for the diagnosis, treatment and/or prevention of diseases in companion pets and equine animals. Founded in 1946 and headquartered in Sterling, Massachusetts, Webster has developed a strong brand identity as a value-added, full-service distributor of a virtually complete range of consumable supplies, equipment, diagnostic supplies, biologicals (vaccines) and pharmaceuticals. Webster’s product offering, totaling more than 11,000 items, is sold by approximately 175 field sales representatives. In addition to its core business of distributing veterinary products, Webster has a significant agency commission business with a few large pharmaceutical manufacturers. Under the agency relationships, Webster typically earns a commission for soliciting orders through its sales force. In the agency relationship, Webster processes the order to the manufacturer but handles none of the product nor does Webster bill and collect from the customer. The agency commissions that Webster earns range from 3% to 10%, a portion of which is shared with the direct sales personnel. Webster’s agency commissions accounted for less than 2%1% of its net sales in fiscal 2007.2008. Net sales by Webster in fiscal 20072008 were $399.4$446.4 million. Operating income totaled $22.1$24.7 million.

The Company estimates the market for pharmaceuticals and supplies sold to companion animal and equine veterinarians through distribution is approximately $2.8 billion on an annual basis. Based upon the estimated $2.8 billion market, the Company believes its share of this market is approximately 14%. Similar to the dental supply market, the veterinary supply market is fragmented and geographically diverse. There are approximately 79,000 veterinarians practicing at 27,000 animal health clinics. The vast majority, approximately 67% of veterinarians, work in private animal health clinics specializing in small animals, predominately companion pets. The average private veterinary practice generates approximately $770,000 of annual revenue. These practices

purchase between $80,000 and $120,000 of supplies each year, and similar to the dental practitioner, do not maintain a large supply of inventory on hand. The typical veterinary practice purchases approximately 80% of its supplies from its top two suppliers. The average purchase of consumables by the veterinary practice is noticeably higher than that of the dental practitioner due predominately to pharmaceutical products which are administered and dispensed by veterinarians.

According to a market study prepared by KPMG LLP for three veterinary professional organizations in 1999, the demand for veterinary services has historically grown significantly faster than growth in the overall economy. Total expenditures for veterinary services in the United States grew at an inflation adjusted real annual rate of 7.2% from 1980 through 1997, and are projected to grow 5% on a real basis annually, through the year 2015. The companion pet segment is the fastest growing area of the overall U.S. veterinary supply market. The Company believes this growth is sustainable due to the following favorable factors:

 

  

Number of households with companion animals. The number of households with companion animals is steadily expanding which increases the demand for veterinary services. Today, 63% of U.S. households own a companion pet compared with 56% in 1988. Overall, 45% of all households in the U.S. own more than one pet.

 

  

Veterinary expenditures per household.The amount pet owners are willing to spend caring for their pets is increasing substantially. The American Pet Products Manufacturers Association estimates that pet owners will spend $38.4 billion in 20062008 to care for the American pet population, or $555 per household. This is a 125% increase over the $17 billion spent in 1994.

 

  

Veterinary products and techniques.Many new therapeutic and preventive products are being developed for the companion animal market. Technological developments have resulted in new innovative veterinary products and advances in veterinary services.

Strategy

Webster’s objective is to build a leading national position in the companion animal veterinary market through internal expansion and acquisitions, while continuing to improve its profitability and enhance its value to customers. Its key strategies and priorities for accomplishing this are to open new geographic markets, make acquisitions that expand market share, emphasize value-added capabilities, consistently improve operating efficiencies and broaden the product offering.

Growing Through Internal Expansion and Acquisitions.In April 2004, Webster acquired the assets of ProVet, which was the companion animal veterinary supply division of Lextron, Inc. ProVet was a distributor with locations in Indianapolis, Kansas City, Houston, Denver and Seattle. Management believes this acquisition made Webster the second largest distributor of companion-animal veterinary supplies in the U.S. This acquisition added 44 sales representative territories expanding Webster’s geographic coverage to include the states of Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Nevada, Idaho and Oregon. In addition, the acquisition increased market coverage in Washington state and Texas where Webster already had a presence.

In October 2004, Webster acquired Milburn Distributions, Inc., the largest distributor specializing in the U.S. equine veterinary supply market. Milburn’s annualized sales exceed $50 million. The company operates facilities in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Texas and Florida. Most companion-animal and large animal veterinary supply distributors have not successfully served the nation’s equine veterinarians due to the highly specialized nature of this niche market. Milburn has capitalized on this opportunity by focusing exclusively on the unique needs of equine veterinarians.

In fiscal 2006, Webster grew through both an acquisition and greenfield expansion. In December 2005, it acquired Intra Corp., one of the nation’s leading developers of veterinary practice management software that is marketed under the IntraVet brand name. IntraVet has approximately 2,200more than 2,000 software installations nationwide and furthers Webster’s strategy of establishing a value-added business platform similar to that of Patterson Dental.

Also in fiscal 2006, Webster developed business through a program of internal start-ups, including operations in Ohio, Michigan and California. The expansion into California, which had been Webster’s largest unserved market, was particularly successful and has made a solid contribution to Webster’s fiscal 2006 and 2007 sales results.

During fiscal 2008, Webster acquired New England X-Ray, Inc. in the first quarter and Associated Medical Supply, Inc. in the fourth quarter. New England X-Ray expanded product and service offerings and Associated Medical Supply, Inc. strengthened Webster’s competitive position in the southwestern U.S. Further expansion of Webster’s geographic marketplace is anticipated in the future.

Emphasizing Value-Added, Full-Service Capabilities. Webster believes that veterinary customers value full service and responsive delivery of product, in addition to competitive prices. Customers also increasingly expect suppliers to be knowledgeable about products and services, and generally a superior sales representative can create a special relationship with the practitioner by providing an informational link to the overall industry. Webster’s knowledgeable sales representatives assist customers in the selection and purchasing of supplies. Most veterinarians are independent, or small unit based, practitioners who are unable to store and manage large volumes of supplies in their offices. Webster meets its customer’s requirements by delivering frequent, small quantity orders rapidly and reliably from its strategically located distribution centers.

Continuing to Improve Operating Efficiencies. Webster continuously pursues opportunities to lower costs and improve efficiencies. As of April 2007,2008, Webster shares three distribution facilities with one or both of the other operating units. In addition, a customer system that can be used by multiple business segments but maintains the same look and feel of the eMAGINE® system has been fully deployed within the unit. The new system provides customer support staff with integrated customer information on one screen.

Broaden the Product Line. Webster continuously seeks to broaden its portfolio of product offerings to maximize the opportunities within its existing customer base. For example, in the past yeartwo years Webster’s expansion of its product offerings included the entire companion animal products linesline of BayerPfizer Animal Health and Novartis Animal Health, the parasiticides Tri-Heart Plus, Iverhart Plus™ and Iverhart Max™, Clavamoxequine products, Rimadyl® canine analgesic, Vetsulin™ canine insulin, Continuum™ small animal antibiotic, the line of Purina Veterinary Dietsvaccines, equine anti-inflammatory Surpass®, Continuum™ feline vaccines, Calicivax feline vaccines, Sogeval dermatolgic products, Reconcile™ separation anxiety medication for dogs, thenutraceutical Enisyl-F™ and canine nutraceutical Welactin™, Alphatrack blood glucose monitor, Cislak dental instruments, Previcox® canine analgesic, Mometamax otic preparation, Genesis topical spray, SCA2000 blood coagulation analyzer, Polymune equine plasma, Solitude feed-through fly preventive, SNAP 4DXBile Acid diagnostic test, the small animal nutraceutical Dasuquin™, equine vaccines Prevenile and Prestige IV Foal Shot, Dickies Medical Uniforms and the exclusive products Opticide disinfectant and Caniplas canine plasma.test.

Webster also strives to consistently introduce innovative products. In fiscal 2005, Webster successfully launched its private label initiative to supply veterinary customers with quality consumable goods (white goods, exam gloves, sutures, surgical blades and microscope slides) at value prices. Private label offerings have been expanded since the initial launch and are expected to continue to grow. Management believes that product innovation allows Webster to maintain its competitive position and helps fuel internal growth. Management also believes that its emphasis on new product offerings enables its sales force to remain effective in creating demand among veterinarians.

Broadening the product line also includes bringing new, innovative services to the customer to allow them to generate greater revenues and profitability from their practice. As Webster continues to expand and build its equipment business, it has added clinic and hospital design capabilities and technical service personnel to install and repair equipment that is sold by Webster as well as by others. With the fiscal 2006 acquisition of the IntraVet practice management software product, new services and revenue opportunities become possible. In addition, with the growth in the equipment and software business, there is an opportunity for additional financing transactions.

Products and Services

The following table sets forth the sales by principal categories of products and services offered to veterinary segment customers:

 

   2007  2006  2005 

Consumable and printed products

  91% 93% 94%

Equipment and software

  7  5  4 

Other

  2  2  2 
          

Total

  100% 100% 100%
          

   2008  2007  2006 

Consumable and printed products

  92% 91% 93%

Equipment and software

  7  7  5 

Other

  1  2  2 
          

Total

  100% 100% 100%
          

Consumable and Printed Products

Webster offers its customers a broad selection of veterinary supply products including consumable supplies, pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, and biologicals. Consumable supplies distributed by Webster include lab supplies, various types and sizes of paper goods, needles and syringes, gauze and wound dressings, sutures, latex gloves, orthopedic and casting products. Webster’s pharmaceutical products include anesthetics, antibiotics, injectibles, ointments and nutraceuticals. The diagnostics product category includes on-site testing products for heartworm, FIV, FELV and Parvo- virus. Biological products are comprised of vaccines and injectibles. Many of the office supply products sold to the dental supply market are also offered to the veterinary supply market.

Equipment and Software

Webster sells equipment for hospital, laboratory and general surgical use within the veterinary practice. Fiscal 20072008 equipment sales increased 69% from fiscal 2006 and accounted for 7% of veterinary segment sales. Webster offers innovative, quality equipment that differentiates Webster from the competition. New equipment offerings in fiscal 2007 included the Fuji FCR-XC Digital Radiography System, the VJ-DR Digital X-ray System, Accent CCD Digital Imaging System, ScanX Duo Dental Digital Imaging System, Acclaim Intraoral Camera, Unico centrifuges, Cardell Max-1 Anesthetic Monitor, MacroView Veterinary Otoscope, Idexx VetLab UA Analyzer and the petMap Blood Pressure unit. About 50% of veterinary equipment orders are drop shipped directly to the customer, of which 15% are custom ordered from the manufacturer. The balance ofother half veterinary equipment is distributed in a fashionmanner similar to consumable supplies.

Other

Other products and services include commissions on agency sales, equipment repair revenues, software maintenance contract revenue and freight recovery on shipments to customers.

Sales and Marketing

A primary component of Webster’s value-added approach is its sales force. Due to the fragmented nature of the veterinary supply market, Webster believes that a large sales force is necessary to reach potential customers and to provide full service. Sales representatives provide an informational link to the overall industry, assist practitioners in selecting and purchasing products, and help customers efficiently manage their supply inventories. Each representative works within an assigned sales territory under the supervision of a location (branch) manager. Sales representatives are employees and are generally compensated on a commission basis, with some, less experienced, representatives receiving a base salary and commission.

To assist its sales representatives, Webster publishes a catalog, which contains approximately 11,000 SKUs. This catalog includes detailed descriptions and specifications of products and is utilized by practitioners as a reference source. Selected consumable supplies, new products, specially priced items and high-demand items are promoted through merchandise fliers printed and distributed monthly.

Webster’s website was built upon the proven technology of the Patterson Dental website and the site allows customers the ability to order items twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The website also incorporates value-added functions that permit customers to check their invoice, payment and credit history, build a “shopping list” of frequently purchased items and track their order status.

Distribution

As of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, veterinary products were stocked and shipped out of 1213 distribution centers within the Patterson Logistics distribution network. The distribution of veterinary products is complemented by telesales representatives who are responsible for processing approximately 70% of customer orders in this segment. In order to meet the rapid delivery requirements of customers, most consumable products are delivered within 24 hours. Webster estimates that approximately 97%98% of its consumable orders are delivered to the customer on time.

Sources of Supply

Webster obtains products from nearly 550 vendors. While Webster makes purchases from many suppliers and there is generally more than one source of supply for most of the categories of products, the concentration of business with key suppliers is considerable. In fiscal 20072008 and 2006,2007, Webster’s top 10 veterinary supply manufacturers comprised 63%62% and 67%63%, respectively, and the single largest supplier comprised 19%17% and 19%, respectively, of the total cost of veterinary supply sales.

Competition

Within the “companion pet” market segment, competitors range from small local distributors to large national and regional full-service companies, and to a lesser extent, mail order distributors or buying groups. Webster also competes directly with pharmaceutical companies who sell certain products directly to the customer.

The Company approaches its markets by emphasizing and delivering a value-added model to the practitioner. To differentiate itself from its competition it deploys a strategy of premium customer service, a highly qualified and motivated sales force, an extensive breadth and mix of products and services, accurate and timely delivery of product, strategic location of sales offices and competitive pricing.

Rehabilitation Supply

Overview

Patterson Medical formerly known as AbilityOne Corporation, is headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois and is the world’s leading distributor of rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products. Patterson Medical believes it offers the most comprehensive range of distributed and self-manufactured rehabilitation products to health care professionals globally. Its mission is to provide health care professionals and their patients with access to products that improve peoples’ lives by helping them to attain their highest achievable level of independence, safety and comfort. Patterson Medical operates as Sammons Preston Rolyan in North America and Homecraft in international markets.

Patterson Medical serves as the gateway through which over 30,000 rehabilitation products originating from more than 2,000 suppliers and manufacturers are sold to a diverse customer base with an emphasis on physical therapists (“PTs”) and occupational therapists (“OTs”). It offers its customers a “one-stop shop” through what it believes to be the most comprehensive catalog in the industry, the largest direct sales force and the category’s most efficient customer service and distribution operations. Major channels of distribution are acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, rehabilitation clinics, dealers and schools. In addition, Patterson believes Patterson Medical’s reputation, global market presence and highly transferable business model will facilitate entry into new markets.

Patterson Medical offers a wide range of differentiated, non-invasive products and expertise to users and their health care providers, while focusing on niches, worldwide, where its capabilities, reputation and customer partnerships can result in a competitive advantage. Its goal is to become its customers’ first choice for rehabilitation medical supplies and assistive products in each of its chosen markets.

Patterson Medical is highly diversified with no single product, customer or purchasing group representing a significant percentage of total revenue. In addition, given the relatively small average and median order size (approximately $225 and $70, respectively), Patterson Medical’s products often do not represent a major expense category for its customers.

In March 2002, Patterson Medical completed the acquisition of the Smith & Nephew Rehabilitation (“SNR”) division of Smith & Nephew plc, and in doing so, acquired the Rolyan, Homecraft and Kinetec brand

names. The SNR acquisition added 3,500 additional products, as well as a broad array of other brand names and proprietary products. The acquisition of SNR combined the two leading distributors of rehabilitation medical supplies to create what Patterson believes is the only “one-stop shop” in the industry. Patterson Medical manufactures or has exclusively manufactured for it products representing approximately 25% of its total revenue and purchases products representing the remaining 75%. Approximately 80% of its revenue is in North America.

Patterson Medical believes the rehabilitation medical supplies and assistive products industry is approximately $4.6 billion in the U.S. and $6.2 billion worldwide and is expected to grow 6% to 8% over the next several years. Industry growth is driven by strong growth in the physical and occupational therapy markets and favorable demographic trends associated with the aging of the baby-boom generation. Patterson Medical does not compete in wheelchairsmotorized-wheelchairs or scooters, a market estimated to be a combined $2.2 billion worldwide. Therefore, Patterson Medical’s addressable market (defined as the collective market for products sold by Patterson Medical) is approximately $4.0 billion worldwide. Patterson Medical believes that it has an industry leading market share of approximately 5%6% in a highly fragmented rehabilitation and assistive products market.

Patterson Medical believes that the demand for rehabilitation products will continue to be influenced by the following factors:

 

  

Favorable Demographics.Favorable demographic trends such as extended life expectancy, active lifestyles and a general willingness to spend discretionary income on health care and well being, are expected to contribute to increased demand for products distributed by Patterson Medical. Specifically, the aging baby-boomer population, together with their increased disposable income and desire for independence, will fuel product purchases to assist with the frailties associated with old age and provide sustained sales growth.

The U.S. Census Bureau has projected the 85 and older population in the U.S. to more than triple from four million in 2000 to 14 million by 2040. The 65 to 84 year old population is expected to more than double during the same time period. Current trends indicate that these age groups represent the majority of home and community-based health care patients.

The aging of the population is a revenue growth driver because approximately 10% of people over the age of 65 and approximately 50% of people over the age of 85 need assistance with everyday activities. Patterson Medical believes it is well positioned to benefit from this trend by providing aids to daily living, namely dressing devices; toileting, dining, bathing aids; and grooming devices, all of which promote greater patient independence, improved patient responsibility and improved responsiveness to treatment.

The aging of the population is a revenue growth driver because approximately 10% of people over the age of 65 and approximately 50% of people over the age of 85 need assistance with everyday activities. Patterson Medical believes it is well positioned to benefit from this trend by providing aids to daily living, namely dressing devices; toileting, dining, bathing aids; and grooming devices, all of which promote greater patient independence, improved patient responsibility and improved responsiveness to treatment.

 

  

Increasing Number of PTs and OTs, Patterson Medical’s Primary User Groups.According to the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Outlook Handbook, there were approximately 132,000 PTs and 78,000 OTs in the U.S. in 2000. Approximately two-thirds of PTs were employed in either hospitals or offices of physical therapists. The remaining one-third of PTs was employed in home health agencies, outpatient rehabilitation clinics, physician offices and nursing homes. The majority of OTs workswork in hospitals, including many in rehabilitation and psychiatric hospitals. The remaining OTs work in outpatient occupational therapy offices and clinics, schools, home health agencies, nursing homes, community mental health centers, adult day care programs, job training services and residential care

facilities. The demand for PTs and OTs is expected to remain strong largely driven by the (i) increase in the number of individuals with disabilities or limited function requiring therapy services; (ii) rapidly growing elderly population which is particularly vulnerable to chronic and debilitating conditions that require therapeutic services; (iii) baby-boom generation which is entering the prime age for heart attacks and strokes, increasing the demand for cardiac and physical rehabilitation; (iv) advances in medical technology which permit treatment of more disabling conditions; and (v) widespread interest in health promotion.

  

Increasing Frequency of Reconstructive and Implant Surgery.Another important driver of the growth in the PT market is the growing need for rehabilitation products resulting from the increasing frequency of reconstructive implant procedures, including hip and knee replacements. The worldwide reconstructive implant market is currently in excess of $5.0 billion and expected to grow between 7% and 8% annually. This growth trajectory is largely driven by favorable demographics, as patient populations are expanding at both ends of the age spectrum. Among seniors, more active lifestyles and longer life expectancies are responsible for the increasing frequency of reconstructive implants. Younger patients are opting for reconstructive implants over less invasive alternatives due to improved and longer lasting implant technology. Patterson Medical believes it is well positioned to benefit from the growth in reconstructive implants, by providing orthopedic products, namely Continuous Passive Motion machines and splinting, which are critical to post-operatory rehabilitation.

International Operations

Patterson Medical’s international operations are based in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and are made up of two divisions: Homecraft in the U.K. and Kinetec in France. The international operations broadly reflect the same business model as used in the North American market. In the U.K., Homecraft operations include sales and marketing, customer service, distribution, purchasing and administration. In France, Kinetec is a self-contained manufacturing unit with limited sales and marketing, distribution, administration and purchasing.

Homecraft is a leading supplier of aids to daily living (“ADL”) and rehabilitation products in the U.K., and a significant player in the international markets. Having developed and designed many proprietary products, Homecraft is the prime source for numerous established and market leading ADL brands, including products sold under the Sammons Preston Rolyan brand. The Homecraft catalog offers a broad line of ADL, therapy, rehabilitation and pediatric products containing over 10,000 items. Their catalog is circulated to PTs, OTs, loan equipment stores and private clinics, trade outlets and the general public.

Homecraft’s central sales and marketing strategy is to provide a “one-stop shop” proposition to hospitals, local government and trade customers throughout the U.K. Customers are reached through a combination of mail order, a 1312 person sales force, telemarketing and in-market promotional and exhibition activity.

Kinetec consists of two operations, the manufacturing and distribution of Continuous Passive Motions machines (“CPMs”) for sale on a worldwide basis and the sale and distribution of Sammons Preston Rolyan and Homecraft products in France. Products are marketed to customers through product brochures, mailings, tele-marketing and a 6 person sales force that covers the French rehabilitation market.

Strategy

Patterson Medical’s objective is to be the customers’ first choice for rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products in each of its chosen markets. It intends to grow through internal expansion and acquisitions in both rehabilitation and related products. In the second half of fiscal 2006, a new management team was installed and is responsible for accelerating the unit’s adoption of Patterson’s value-added strategy.

Emphasizing Value-Added, Full-Service Capabilities.Patterson Medical currently offers their customer a “one-stop shop” for products through their industry-leading catalog with over 20,000 items, focused primarily on

physical and occupational therapy products. Patterson Medical adds new products each year to its ever-expanding catalog and is committed to doing so long-term. Consistent with Patterson Medical’s current product offering, some of these new products are branded, exclusive or self-manufactured.

Patterson Medical recognizes that different customer groups have very different economic, product, distribution channel requirements and treatment goals. Patterson Medical proactively attempts to anticipate and flexibly respond to the diverse needs of its customers, while focusing on niches, worldwide, where its

capabilities, reputation and customer partnerships can result in a competitive advantage. As such, Patterson Medical foresees an on-going evolution of its product offerings to meet the ever-increasing demands of its diverse customer segments.

Improving Operating Efficiencies.Patterson Medical’s proprietary products, which consist of self-manufactured products, products manufactured for Patterson Medical and products sold through exclusive distribution arrangements represent approximately 30% of total revenues. During fiscal 2007,Over the past two years, Patterson Medical made investments in new sales and marketing programs as a part of its accelerated adoption of Patterson’s value-added strategy, including the expansion of its sales force and the establishment of a branch office structure. The Company believes these investments will result in additional sales and operating efficiencies ininto the future.

As of April 2007,2008, the unit is distributing products from four shared distribution facilities that distribute products of two or all three Patterson operating units. In addition, the first shared branch office location has beenwas created late in fiscal 2007 in Northern California. This branch location includes both dental and rehabilitation segment personnel, while allowing the two units to share in certain common expenses.

Growing Through Internal Expansion and Acquisitions.Patterson Medical believes it is well positioned to expand in its core markets. Patterson Medical’s market presence, clinical understanding and close customer relationships allow Patterson Medical to anticipate and flexibly respond to the diverse needs of its customers. Patterson Medical believes its market knowledge, strong vendor relationships and manufacturing capabilities will continue to drive the delivery of value-added solutions through the continual enrichment of its product mix. Additionally, Patterson Medical believes its broad portfolio of national accounts and commitment to expand its sales force will enhance Patterson Medical’s growth and penetration within its current and new customer base.

Patterson Medical acquired Homecraft and Kinetec as part of the SNR transaction. Patterson Medical is leveraging this platform to accelerate international expansion, in terms of both product lines and geographic regions. Since the SNR transaction, Patterson Medical has added over 550 pages of new products to the Homecraft catalog. Homecraft and Kinetec brought with them a proven capability to source products at very favorable costs and at high levels of quality from China, which has resulted in meaningful cost savings. Patterson Medical’s management team believes its business model is transferable to other countries, and is using Homecraft to cultivate new relationships through an enhanced product array, sales effort, distribution capabilities and catalog expertise.

In May 2004, Patterson Medical acquired the assets of Medco Supply Company, Inc., or “Medco,” from NCH Corporation. With sales of approximately $50$40 million, Medco is one of the nation’s leading sports medicine distributors and is based in Buffalo, New York. In addition to its sports medicine business, it sells first aid, safety and medical consumable products to commercial and institutional customers, as well as consumable supplies and equipment to podiatrists. The complete product offering includes approximately 10,000 SKUs that are sold through direct mail catalogs and 15 territory sales people. Medco markets to athletic trainers, schools and school nurses, daycare providers and healthcare professionals including podiatrists, chiropractors and physical therapists.

During fiscal 2007,Over the past two years, the unit has opened twelve branch offices through acquisitions and internal start-ups in desirable locations throughout the U.S. In November 2007, Patterson Medical acquired three dealer/distributors which are operating as branch offices.PTOS software, a leading line of practice management software for physical therapists.

Patterson Medical operates in the highly fragmented rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products industry. Patterson Medical’s competition is generally either locally or regionally focused. Patterson Medical intends to opportunistically pursue expansion opportunities in order to add products, customers and capabilities, which will further differentiate Patterson Medical from its competition.

Products and Services

The following table sets forth the sales by principal categories offered to rehabilitation segment customers:

 

  2007 2006 2005   2008 2007 2006 

Consumable and printed products

  72% 72% 74%  70% 72% 72%

Equipment

  23  23  22   25  23  23 

Other

  5  5  4   5  5  5 
                    

Total

  100% 100% 100%  100% 100% 100%
                    

Consumable and Printed Products

Patterson Medical offers a large selection of supply products that can be categorized as follows:

 

Aids to Daily Living—dressing devices, toileting, dining, bathing aids and grooming devices

 

Orthopedic Soft Goods / Splints—braces, splints and orthonics for protecting, supporting and positioning

 

Clinical—products that assist in the examination and treatment of patients, such as exercise bands, putty, weights balls and mats

 

Mobility—walkers, canes and wheelchair accessories such as gloves, trays and carrying bags

 

Pediatric Seating and Positioning—rolls, wedges, specialty seating and standers and mobility assistance products for special needs children. This category also includes sensory motor stimulation products such as toys, crafts and devices to assist with balancebalance.

 

Modalities—products for heating and cooling therapies, electrical stimulation, laser, ultrasound, paraffin, iontophoresis and therapeutic creams and lotions

Equipment and Software

Rehabilitation equipment consists of exercise, examination, treatment and therapy equipment and furniture. These products include parallel bars, treatment tables, mat platforms, treadmills, stationary bicycles and CPMs. The November 2007 acquisition of PTOS software added a line of practice management software to Patterson Medical’s wide array of product offerings. In addition, certain acquisitions over the past two years have given the unit access to premium equipment lines that were previously unavailable to Patterson Medical.

Sales and Marketing

Its customers generally know Patterson Medical as Sammons Preston Rolyan in the U.S. and Canada, and Homecraft in the remainder of the world. The Sammons Preston Rolyan and Homecraft business models, which Patterson Medical employs in the U.S., Canada and the U.K., have successfully driven revenue growth and profitability.

A core element of Sammons Preston Rolyan’s strategy is to maintain the most comprehensive single catalog of rehabilitation products and supplies. The catalog, published for over 50 years, is considered the gold standard of the industry and features the most comprehensive product offering with longstanding industry-leading positions and recognized brand names.

Patterson Medical has an experienced sales force, national account contracts with major customer groups, unmatched customer service within the industry and the proven ability to introduce new products each year, allowing Patterson Medical to compete across the entire spectrum of the rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products industry.

A key priority has been the expansion of the field sales force, which has grown by more than 4575 sales representatives since late in fiscal 2006 and now totals more than 170200 worldwide. New sales representatives are generally hired from the ranks of physical and occupational therapists, manufacturer representatives and others with extensive industry knowledge.

Patterson Medical began developing a branch office structure in fiscal 2007 through a combination of internal start-ups and dealer/distributor acquisitions. Similar to a dental branch, these offices have a showroom, commissioned sales staff and service department that provides equipment installation, repair and warranty service for equipment manufacturers. As of April 2007, five2008, twelve branches had been established and this structure will continue to expand in fiscal 2008.2009.

Sammons Preston Rolyan’s national accounts group collaborates with its sales force to meet the changing needs of its expanding account base. The product management group works closely with customers, suppliers and the sales force to evaluate new products for inclusion in Sammons Preston Rolyan’s product offering. Sammons Preston Rolyan adds approximately 2,500 new products to the catalog each year. Sammons Preston Rolyan’s U.S. national accounts program is staffed by seasoned professionals who have developed a comprehensive portfolio of contracts. Furthermore, the integrated Sammons Preston Rolyan organization has national contracts with major purchasing groups within each submarket, including hospitals, nursing homes and dealers.

For many years, Sammons Preston and SNR had the only national sales forces in the U.S. dedicated to the clinical education and sale of products to institutionally based PTs and OTs. With the acquisition and integration of SNR, Patterson Medical’s clinical presence and sales capability have been enhanced with a broader product offering and a more complete range of proprietary brands. The Patterson Medical sales professionals, many of whom are therapists, are located throughout the U.S. and Canada. These sales professionals have utilized the extensive product line and the comprehensive national contracts portfolio to establish direct sales to U.S. hospitals, nursing homes and rehab clinics. Patterson Medical also sells to national healthcare distributors and local dealers.

The rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products that Patterson Medical offers are generally not subject to direct reimbursement pressures from Medicare and Medicaid. Patterson Medical does not engage in third-party billing and collection activities, but sells to customers, including dealers, who provide this service.

The rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products industry is highly fragmented. No one manufacturer, distributor or customer represents a significant portion of Patterson Medical’s revenue.

Distribution

Patterson Medical’s distribution process centers on its ability to fill small unit size and small dollar amount orders. In the U.S., over 5,000 packages ship daily from sixfive locations. A majority of products are shipped out of an eastern Pennsylvania distribution center that is shared between all three Patterson operating units. Patterson Medical moved into this facility during fiscal 2007, at which time an existing distribution center located in Bolingbrook, IL was closed. Certain high volume product is distributed from other multi-segment facilities within the Patterson Logistics distribution network. Approximately 95% of the packages in the U.S. ship via UPS.

Patterson Medical’s call center operates from 7am – 7pm Monday through Friday, processing in excess of 4,000 calls per day. Order entry capability from 7pm – 7am from Monday through Friday and weekends exists

through an offsite, third-party contractor with limited systems access. The combination of in-house staff, supplemented with contracted, third party services, provide customers with 24 hours a day, seven days a week ordering capabilities. In addition, fax orders and EDI capabilities support the larger, more technologically advanced customers, including dealers, hospitals and long-term care facilities. While Internet ordering capabilities currently exist, customer reception to ordering products via the Internet is currently small, but growing.

Sources of Supply

Among Patterson Medical’s core strengths is its ability to obtain premier products from vendors. Patterson Medical purchases its products from over 2,000 suppliers and manufacturers. Although no single supplier accounted for 10% or more than 4% of Patterson Medical’s total purchases in fiscal 2007,2008, Patterson Medical frequently is the largest single customer of these manufacturers. Suppliers view the ability to distribute their products through Sammons Preston Rolyan and Homecraft positively due to reputation, longstanding industry-leading position, comprehensive catalogs, national account contracts, and sales force presence and distribution capabilities. Patterson Medical continually works at strengthening its supplier relationships through the introduction of supplier programs.

Competition

Patterson Medical believes it is the only national player to offer, “one-stop shopping” to its customers. Patterson Medical’s competition is generally highly fragmented, locally or regionally focused and without the product offering necessary to be a “one-stop shop.” Patterson Medical’s national and international scale and purchasing power provide Patterson Medical with a favorable cost position and strong pricing trends relative to its competition.

For further information on each of the Company’s three operating segments, and operations by geographic area, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this document and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Patterson Companies, Inc.

Trademarks

Patterson has registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office the trademarks “Patterson®,” “PDXpress®,” “EagleSoft®and “eMAGINE®.” With the addition of Patterson Medical, the Company acquired the marks Sammons, Preston, Roylan, Homecraft and numerous other tradenames and trademarks. The Company believes that the Patterson trademark isthese trademarks are well recognized in the dental products industrywithin their respective industries, and by dental professionals, and isare therefore a valuable assetassets of the Company.

Employees

As of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, the Company had approximately 6,5806,850 employees. Patterson has not experienced a shortage of qualified personnel in the past, and believes that it will be able to attract such employees in the future. None of Patterson’s employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements or represented by a union. The Company considers its relations with its employees to be good.

Website

The Company makes available, free of charge, on its website, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions. This material may be accessed by visiting the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website atwww.pattersoncompanies.com.

Information relating to corporate governance at Patterson, including our Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics and information concerning our executive officers, directors and Board committees, and transactions in Patterson securities by directors and officers, is available on or through our websitewww.pattersoncompanies.comwww.pattersoncompanies.com under the “Corporate Governance” and “Investor Relations” captions.

We are not including the informationInformation maintained on our website is not being included as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Governmental Regulation

The marketing, distribution and sale of certain products sold by the Company are subject to the requirements of various federal, state and local laws and regulations. The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Among the federal laws which impact the Company are the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which regulates the advertising, record keeping, labeling, handling, storage and sale of drugs and medical devices which are distributed by the Company, and which requires the Company to be registered with the Federal Food and Drug Administration; the Safe Medical Devices Act, which imposes certain reporting requirements on the Company in the event of an incident involving serious illness, injury or death caused by a medical device distributed by the Company; and the Controlled Substance Act, which regulates the record keeping, handling, storage and sale of certain drugs sold by the Company, and which requires the Company to be registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration. In addition, the transportation of certain products distributed by the Company that are considered hazardous materials is subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation.

The Company also is required to be licensed as a distributor of drugs and medical devices by each state in which it conducts business. In addition, several state Boards of Pharmacy require the Company to be licensed in their state for the sale of animal health products within their jurisdiction. The Company is also subject to the requirements of foreign laws and regulations, which impact the Company’s operations in those foreign countries where the Company conducts business.

While the Company believes it is in substantial compliance with the laws and regulations which regulate its business, and that it possesses all the licenses required in the conduct of its business, the failure to comply with any of those laws or regulations, or the imposition of new laws or regulations could negatively impact the Company’s business.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below is the name, age and position of the executive officers of the Company as of June 27, 2007.25, 2008.

 

James W. Wiltz

 6263  President and Chief Executive Officer—Patterson Companies, Inc.

Peter L. Frechette

 6970  Chairman of the Board—Patterson Companies, Inc.

R. Stephen Armstrong

 5657  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer—Patterson Companies, Inc.

Gary D. JohnsonDaniel H. Peckskamp

 6048  Vice President, Operations—Operations and Shared Services—Patterson Companies, Inc.

Lynn E. Askew

Jerome E. Thygesen

 4445
49
  

Vice President, Management Information Systems—Patterson Companies, Inc.

Jerome E. Thygesen

50Vice President, Human Resources—Patterson Companies, Inc.

Scott P. Anderson

 4041  President—Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.

George L. Henriques

 4647  President—Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc.

David P. Sproat

 4041  President—Patterson Medical Products, Inc.

The officers of the Company are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Background of Executive Officers

James W. Wiltz was named the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in May 2005. Mr. Wiltz had held the position of President and Chief Operating Officer since April 2003. Upon being elected Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Wiltz retained the title of President, however the Company eliminated the Chief Operating Officer position. Mr. Wiltz also served as a Vice President of the Company from 1986 to 2003 and as President of Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., from 1996 to 2003. Patterson has employed him since September 1969, initially as a territory sales representative. Mr. Wiltz was appointed to the Board of Directors in March 2001.

Peter L. Frechettewas Chief Executive Officer of the Company from September 1982 to May 2005. Mr. Frechette has been a Director of Patterson since March 1983 and was namedcurrently serves as our Chairman of the Board inand has held that position since May of 1985. Mr. FrechetteHe served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companyfrom September 1982 through May 2005 and as President from September 1982 to April 2003. He has been one of our directors since March 1983. Prior to joining Patterson, Mr. Frechette was employed by American Hospital Supply Corporation for 18 years, the last seven of which he served as presidentPresident of its Scientific Products Division.

R. Stephen Armstrong was elected Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company effective July 1999. Prior toBefore joining Patterson, Mr. Armstrong had been an Assurance Partner with Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP is currently the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Mr. Armstrong has been a director of Delphax Technologies, Inc. since 2000.

Gary D. JohnsonDaniel H. Peckskampwas elected became Vice President, Operations and Shared Services, in June 2008. Prior to joining Patterson, Companies,Mr. Peckskamp was with ADC Telecommunications, Inc. in June 2004. Mr. Johnson held the positiona variety of positions since 1985, most recently as Vice President Sales, of Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.Global Operations from October 1996 through May 2004. Mr. Johnson has served in various sales2006 to 2008, Vice President of Operations from 2001 to 2006 and management positions since he joined the Company in August 1981.Vice President of International Operations from 2000 to 2001.

Lynn E. Askewbecame Vice President, Management Information Systems, in September 1999. Mr. Askew joined Patterson in 1994 as Manager, Distributed Systems, and was promoted to Director, Systems and Development in 1996. Prior toBefore joining Patterson, Mr. Askew provided advanced technology consulting and project management services to various organizations, including Patterson.

Jerome E. Thygesenbecame Vice President, Human Resources, in March 2006. Prior to joining Patterson, Mr. Thygesen was Vice President, Organizational Development for Fairview Red Wing Health Services from September 2001 to February 2006, and Director of Human Resources for Red Wing Shoe Company from March 1987 to June 2001.

Scott P. Andersonwas named President of the Company’s subsidiary Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., in June 2006. Mr. Anderson most recently held the position of Vice President, Sales of Patterson Dental Supply, Inc. and prior to that was the unit’s Vice President of Marketing. Mr. Anderson joined Patterson in 1993 and was recently elected tocurrently serves on the board of directors of the Dental Trade Alliance, the trade association of dental manufacturers, distributors and laboratories.

George L. Henriqueswas named President of Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc. in August 2006. Mr. Henriques previously served as chief information officer of Webster Veterinary since 2000 and also serves on the board of directors of the American Veterinary Distributors Association.

David P. Sproatwas named President of Patterson Medical Products, Inc. in September 2005. Mr. Sproat joined Patterson Companies in 1997 and has served in various sales and marketing capacities, including Vice President, Sales of the Patterson Dental Supply, Inc. unit from June 2004 through September 2005.

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

The following list describes several risk factors that are unique to our company. The risk factors described below should be carefully considered, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents filed with the SEC. These riskrisks factors are being disclosed based on instructions set forth in Item 503(c) of Regulation S-K.

We compete in distribution industries that are highly competitive and we may not be able to compete successfully.

Our competitors include numerous manufacturers and distributors. Some of our competitors may have different resources than we do, which could allow them to compete more successfully. Many of our products are available from several resources and our customers tend to have relationships with several different distributors. Competitors could obtain exclusive rights to market particular products, which we would then be unable to market. Our failure to compete effectively may limit and/or reduce our revenues, profitability and cash flow.

Acquisitions of businesses could negatively impact our profitability and return on invested capital.

As a part of our business strategy, we have acquired businesses in the ordinary course and expect to continue acquiring businesses in the future. These acquisitions can involve a number of risks and challenges, any of which could cause significant operating inefficiencies and adversely affect our growth and profitability. Such risks and challenges include underperformance relative to our expectations and the price paid for the acquisition; unanticipated demands on our management and operational resources; difficulty in integrating personnel, operations and systems; retention of customers of the combined businesses; assumption of contingent liabilities; and acquisition-related earnings charges.

Our international operations are subject to risks that could adversely affect our operating results.

There are a number of risks inherent in foreign operations, which include regulatory, economic and political requirements and changes. Additionally, foreign operations expose us to foreign currency fluctuations that could impact our results of operations and financial condition based on the movements of the applicable foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. Dollar.

Our future operating results can be affected by our relationships with our sales representatives and vendors and manufacturers of products that we distribute.

The inability to attract or retain qualified sales personnel or build or maintain relationships with vendors and manufacturers of products that we distribute may have an adverse effect on our business.

We sell products that could be subject to market and technological obsolescence.

We carry over 100,000 different product stock keeping units. Some of these products are subject to technological obsolescence that may not be within the control of the Company since we do not manufacture the products. If we were no longer able to sell these products due to customers making decisions not to buy them, we may have to record expense related to the diminution in value of inventories we have in stock that would adversely impact our operating results.

Audits by tax authorities could result in additional tax payments for prior periods.

The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities and by non-U.S. tax authorities. If these audits result in assessments different from our reserves, our future results may include unfavorable adjustments to our tax liabilities.

We are subject to a variety of litigation that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to a variety of litigation incidental to our business, including claims for damages arising out of the use of products we distribute, claims relating to intellectual property matters, and claims involving employment matters. We are also subject to securities litigation.

The defense of these lawsuits may divert our management’s attention, we may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits, and we may be required to pay damage awards or settlements or become subject to equitable remedies that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Any insurance or indemnification rights that we may have may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against potential loss exposures.

Leadership Development and Succession Planning

Our business could suffer if it loses key personnel unexpectedly or fails to provide for an orderly management succession. Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to recruit skilled personnel for the business, and then identify and train our personnel for their transition into key roles to support the long-term growth of the business. While our board of directors and management actively monitor our succession plan and processes, any sudden change at the senior management level may adversely affect our business.

We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired.

Our balance sheet includes goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, in the United States, if impairment of our goodwill or other identifiable intangible assets is determined we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in the period of such determination.

We are exposed to the risk of an increasechanges in interest rates.

Our balance sheet includes variable rate long-term debt and certain non-current assets that are sensitive to movements in short-term interest rates. The variable rates are comprised of LIBOR plus a spread and reset on certain dates, as prescribed by the respective agreements. In addition, our balance sheet includes fixed rate long-term debt, whose fair value could be adversely affected by movements in interest rates.

 

Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.The Company has received no written comments regarding our periodic or current reports from the staff of the SEC that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of our 2008 fiscal year that remain unresolved.

 

Item 2.PROPERTIES

The Company owns its principal executive offices in St. Paul, Minnesota, and the majority of its distribution and manufacturing facilities. Leases of other distribution, manufacturing and administrative facilities generally are on a long-term basis, expiring at various times, with options to renew for additional periods. Most sales offices are leased for varying and usually shorter periods, with or without renewal options. The Company believes its properties are in good operating condition and are suitable for the purposes for which they are being used.

Patterson Logistics Services

Effective at the beginning of fiscal 2007, the majority of the assets used to distribute product that were previously owned and operated by individual business units were transferred to a wholly owned subsidiary of Patterson Companies, Inc. The new entity, Patterson Logistics Services, Inc. (“PLSI”) operates the distribution function for the benefit of all three of the sales and marketing business units.

As of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, PLSI operates 1819 distribution centers totaling approximately 900,000 square feet of distribution space as follows:

 

2 dental distribution centers located in Indiana and Iowa.

 

910 veterinary distribution centers. Sales and administrative personnel for the veterinary segment generally share space with PLSI in these distribution facilities, which are located in Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Missouri and Texas.

 

1 rehabilitation distribution center in New York State.

 

3 distribution centers located in California, Florida and Texas, which stock and distribute both dental and rehabilitation product.

 

2 distribution centers which stock and distribute dental and veterinary products, located in South Carolina and Washington state; and,

1 distribution center located in eastern Pennsylvania distributes product for all three of the business units. This location replaced nearby dental and veterinary distribution centers, as well as the primary rehabilitation distribution center in Illinois.

Approximately 80% of the of the PLSI distribution center space is owned.

Dental Supply

In addition to the locations operated by PLSI, Patterson Dental utilizes an owned location in Illinois used to manufacture and ship printed office products. The dental sales operations in Canada are supported by distribution centers located in Quebec and Alberta, Canada.

The dental supply segment is headquartered in the Company’s principal executive offices. This segment also maintains sales and administrative offices inside the United States at approximately 90 locations in over 40 states and at 10 locations in Canada. Substantially all of these locations are leased.

Veterinary Supply

Headquartered in Sterling, Massachusetts, Webster Veterinary’s sales and administrative personnel generally reside within the PLSI distribution center locations.

Rehabilitation Supply

Patterson Medical is headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Distribution of product in North America is generally performed at PLSI-operated locations. Domestically, the rehabilitation supply segment maintains manufacturing facilities in Wisconsin, New York and South Carolina. In fiscal 2007, fiveOver the past two years, twelve branch sales offices werehave been established through acquisitions and internal start-ups. These branch officesTwo of these locations are located in New York, North Carolina, Louisiana, Illinois and California.a shared location with Patterson Dental branches. The California location is shared with branch operationsmajority of the dental supply segment.these locations are leased.

Internationally, this segment has facilities located in the U.K., France and Canada.

 

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Commencing in August 2005, five purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, naming the Company and certain officers and directors and alleging certain violations of the federal securities laws. On August 31, 2005, the Court entered an order consolidating the cases into a single action captionedIn Re Patterson Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation docketed as File No. 05cv1757 DSD/NMJ. On September 16, 2005, a derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota captionedVance Cadd, Derivatively On Behalf of Patterson Companies, Inc. vs. James W. Wiltz, et al.,docketed as File No. 05-cv-02155 RHK/AJB. This lawsuit named certain officers and directors of the Company as defendants and alleged breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. On October 11, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota captionedTamara Dolliver, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated vs. Patterson Companies, Inc., et al docketed as File No. 05-cv-02383 JNE/SRN. This class action lawsuit was brought on behalf of the participants in the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan against the Company and certain officers and directors, and alleged violations of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act. TheCaddandDollivercases were predicated on essentially the same factual allegations alleged in, and are related cases to, the class action lawsuits consolidated asIn Re Patterson Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation.

In March 2006, pursuant to the Court’s order, lead plaintiffs were selected inIn Re Patterson Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation and Amended Complaints were filed in all three cases. On May 30, 2006, the Company

filed its Motion to Dismiss all three cases. On March 20, 2007, the Court granted the Company’s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice in the Securities and ERISA case, and granted the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice in the Derivative case (theCadd case). A notice of appeal was timely filed only in theCadd case. The Company believes that the allegations made in theCadd case are without merit and it intends to continue to vigorously defend the claim.

The Company has also beenis involved in various product-relatedproduct related and employment-relatedemployment related legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings involve product liability claims arising out of the use of dental products manufactured by third parties and distributed by the Company. The Company believes that if any such productdistributes. Product liability cases were determinedindemnification is generally obtained from our suppliers. However, in favor of the claimants, the manufacturers of such products would have primary responsibility for any damages because Patterson is a distributor of finished goods manufactured by third parties. In the event a manufacturersupplier of a defective product is unable to pay a judgment for which the Company may be jointly liable, the Company couldwould have liability for the entire judgment.

Since May 1985, the

The Company has maintainedmaintains product liability insurance coverage for any potential liability for claims arising out of products sold by the Company. TheWhile the Company believes its insurance coverage is adequate, there can be no assurance that any liabilities which might result fromthe insurance coverage maintained is sufficient or will be available to us in adequate amounts or at reasonable costs in the future. Also, there can be no assurance that the indemnification agreements we have with our suppliers will provide us with adequate protection. In addition, future claims relating to events occurring after May 1985, would be adequatelybrought against the Company could involve claims not covered by such insurance or indemnification agreements, and that any unfavorable results in such cases would notcould have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition. With respect to claims

As of April 26, 2008, the Company had accrued our best estimate of potential losses relating to events occurring prior to May 1985, the agreement providing for the acquisition of Patterson from The Beatrice Companies, Inc. provides that Beatrice and its successors are obligated to indemnify the Company for losses exceeding a litigation reserve established at the time of the acquisition. To date, the successor to Beatrice has not been asked to indemnify the Company regarding any matters. Although the Company has insurance coverage for product liability and other claims relatingthat were probable to events occurring after May 1985result in a liability and may be entitledfor which it was possible to indemnificationreasonably estimate a loss. This accrued amount, as well as related expenses, was not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our method for determining estimated losses considers currently available facts, presently enacted laws and regulations and other external factors, including probable recoveries from third parties under certain circumstances, any additional litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition in the future.parties.

 

Item 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders during the three-month period ended April 28, 2007.fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

PART II

 

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market® under the symbol “PDCO.”

The following table sets forth the range of high and low sale prices for the Company’s common stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

  High  Low

Fiscal 2008

    

First Quarter

  $38.27  $33.81

Second Quarter

  $40.08  $35.03

Third Quarter

  $39.93  $28.32

Fourth Quarter

  $37.78  $30.89
  High  Low  High  Low

Fiscal 2007

        

First Quarter

  $36.13  $31.51  $36.13  $31.51

Second Quarter

  $34.25  $29.61  $34.25  $29.61

Third Quarter

  $38.29  $31.80  $38.29  $31.80

Fourth Quarter

  $39.76  $31.71  $39.76  $31.71
  High  Low

Fiscal 2006

    

First Quarter

  $53.85  $40.85

Second Quarter

  $44.70  $37.71

Third Quarter

  $43.15  $32.00

Fourth Quarter

  $36.97  $32.26

On June 25, 2007,23, 2008, the number of holders of record of common stock was 3,733.3,608. The transfer agent for the Company’s common stock is Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 161 North Concord Exchange, South St. Paul, Minnesota, 55075-0738, telephone: (651) 450-4064.

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in 1992 and expects that for the foreseeable future it will follow a policy of retaining earnings in order to finance the continued development of its business. Payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon the earnings, capital requirements and operating and financial condition of the Company, among other factors.

For information relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see Part III, Item 12.

The Company did not repurchase anyfollowing table sets forth the repurchases of itsour common stock during the fiscal 2007.

quarter ended April 26, 2008:

   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
  Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
  Maximum Number of
Shares that May Be
Purchased Under the
Plan

January 27, 2008 to February 23, 2008

  2,950,337  $32.27  2,950,337  14,069,928

February 24, 2008 to March 22, 2008

  7,112,461(1)  33.99(1) 7,112,461(1) 6,957,467

March 23, 2008 to April 26, 2008

  —     —    —    —  
             

Total fourth quarter

  10,062,798   10,062,798  6,957,467

(1)

During the fiscal month ended March 22, 2008, the Company purchased 792,238 shares of common stock on the open market at an average price per share of $34.58. On March 19, 2008, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a financial institution counterparty. Under the terms of the ASR, the Company paid $250 million and took delivery of 90% of the shares, or 6,320,223

shares, based on an initial share price of $35.60. The final number of shares to be delivered by the counterparty under the ASR was dependent on prevailing market conditions and based on the difference between the initial purchase price per share and a volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock, minus a set discount, for a period of up to six months. Under terms of the ASR, the Company could have received additional shares of common stock from the counterparty or could have been required to deliver shares or cash to the counterparty. On June 18, 2008, the transaction was settled and an additional 1,052,037 shares were delivered to the Company, bringing the total number of shares delivered under the ASR to 7,372,260 at an average price of $33.91.

In September 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to six million shares of common stock in open market transactions. In December 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors expanded this program to allow for the purchase of up to twenty five million shares of common stock in open market transactions. During fiscal 2008, the Company repurchased a total of 18,043,533 shares of common stock. Including final delivery of shares delivered under the ASR in June, 2008, the Company can purchase up to 5,905,430 additional shares under the repurchase authorization, which expires on December 31, 2012.

The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on $100 invested at the market close on April 26, 2002,25, 2003, the last trading day before the beginning of our fifth preceding2004 fiscal year, through and including April 27, 2007, the last trading day before the end of our most recently completed fiscal year,2008 with the cumulative total return of the same time period on the same amount invested in the S&P 500 Index and a Peer Group Index, consisting of 98 companies (including our company) based on the same Standard Industrial Classification Code.* The chart below the graph sets forth the actual numbers depicted on the graph.

 

COMPANY/INDEX/MARKET

  4/27/2002  4/26/2003  4/24/2004  4/30/2005  4/29/2006  4/28/2007

Patterson Companies Inc

  100.00  86.50  172.40  226.33  145.87  162.44

Peer Group Index

  100.00  94.86  150.79  183.37  170.44  190.82

S&P Composite

  100.00  86.69  106.52  113.28  130.74  130.74

   FISCAL YEAR ENDING

COMPANY/INDEX/MARKET

  4/26/2003  4/24/2004  4/30/2005  4/29/2006  4/28/2007  4/26/2008

Patterson Companies, Inc.

  100.00  199.30  261.65  168.63  187.78  173.45

Peer Group Index

  100.00  158.96  193.30  179.67  201.16  204.07

S&P Composite

  100.00  122.88  130.66  150.81  173.79  165.66

*The current composition of SIC Code 5047—Medical & Hospital Equipment—is as follows:

ANIMAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL, INC., CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., HENRY SCHEIN, INC., MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY, INC., NYER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., OWENS & MINOR, INC., PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC., TUTOGEN MEDICAL, INC.

Item 6.SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

 

    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Fiscal Year Ended
  April 28,
2007
  April 29,
2006
  April 30,
2005
  April 24,
2004
  April 26,
2003
 April 27,
2002
 April 28,
2001
 April 29,
2000
 April 24,
1999
 April 25,
1998

Statement of Operations Data:

          

Net sales

 $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457  $1,969,349  $1,656,956 $1,415,515 $1,156,455 $1,045,883 $883,268 $782,284

Cost of sales

  1,829,526   1,700,694   1,558,946   1,267,005   1,082,370  921,335  747,301  678,766  571,698  505,069
                                  

Gross margin

  968,872   914,429   862,511   702,344   574,586  494,180  409,154  367,117  311,570  277,215

Operating expenses(2)

  633,182   591,417   560,375   459,844   395,638  347,000  294,039  269,658  234,098  212,833
                                  

Operating income

  335,690   323,012   302,136   242,500   178,948  147,180  115,115  97,459  77,472  64,382

Other income-net(2)

  (6,082)  (6,039)  (8,689)  (2,980)  7,454  5,043  7,081  5,540  2,239  1,324
                                  

Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change

  329,608   316,973   293,447   239,520   186,402  152,223  122,196  102,999  79,711  65,706

Income taxes

  121,272   118,548   109,749   90,055   70,082  56,933  45,721  38,527  29,815  24,937
                                  

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

 $208,336  $198,425  $183,698  $149,465  $116,320 $95,290 $76,475 $64,472 $49,896 $40,769
                                  

Diluted earnings per share (1)(2)

 $1.51  $1.43  $1.32  $1.08  $0.85 $0.70 $0.56 $0.48 $0.37 $0.31
                                  

Weighted average shares and potentially dilutive shares outstanding(1)

  137,769   139,234   138,873   137,768   136,894  136,402  135,526  135,088  133,986  132,650
                                  

Dividends per common share

  —     —     —     —     —    —    —    —    —    —  

Balance Sheet Data:

          

Working capital

 $509,021  $437,727  $470,439  $507,145  $422,093 $331,413 $310,046 $238,502 $187,952 $133,256

Total assets

  1,940,320   1,911,718   1,685,301   1,588,957   823,978  718,376  549,180  451,976  373,250  316,373

Total debt

  180,024   300,041   321,557   499,587   274  976  990  1,719  2,097  7,202

Stockholders’ equity

  1,379,214   1,242,521   1,015,072   801,758   633,686  514,360  408,515  330,470  265,199  210,303

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   April 26,
2008
  April 28,
2007
  April 29,
2006
  April 30,
2005
  April 24,
2004
 

Statement of Operations Data:

      

Net sales

  $2,998,729  $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457  $1,969,349 

Cost of sales

   1,967,004   1,829,526   1,700,694   1,558,946   1,267,005 
                     

Gross margin

   1,031,725   968,872   914,429   862,511   702,344 

Operating expenses

   672,522   633,182   591,417   560,375   459,844 
                     

Operating income

   359,203   335,690   323,012   302,136   242,500 

Other income-net

   (1,775)  (6,082)  (6,039)  (8,689)  (2,980)
                     

Income before income taxes

   357,428   329,608   316,973   293,447   239,520 

Income taxes

   132,570   121,272   118,548   109,749   90,055 
                     

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change

  $224,858  $208,336  $198,425  $183,698  $149,465 
                     

Diluted earnings per share(1)

  $1.69  $1.51  $1.43  $1.32  $1.08 
                     

Weighted average shares and potentially dilutive shares outstanding(1)

   132,910   137,769   139,234   138,873   137,768 
                     

Dividends per common share

   —     —     —     —     —   

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Working capital

  $518,974  $509,021  $437,727  $470,439  $507,145 

Total assets

   2,076,373   1,940,320   1,911,718   1,685,301   1,588,957 

Total debt

   655,034   180,024   300,041   321,557   499,587 

Stockholders’ equity

   1,004,787   1,379,214   1,242,521   1,015,072   801,758 

(1)Amounts are adjusted for a two-for-one stock splitssplit on September 14, 2004 and June 13, 2000 and a three-for-two stock split on January 12, 1998.2004.
(2)Reflects the adoption of FASB Statement No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in fiscal year 2003. Had this standard been adopted at the beginning of fiscal 1998, income in fiscal years 1998 through 2002 would have been positively impacted by no more than $0.02 per diluted share. In addition, the year ended April 28, 2007 includes the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123(R) “Share-Based Compensation”, which reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.05. All prior years in this summary do not reflect expense under Statement 123(R).
(3)See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company’s fiscal 20072008 financial information is summarized in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the related Notes. The following background is essential to more fully understand the Company’s financial information.

Patterson operates a distribution business in three complementary markets: dental supply, veterinary supply and rehabilitation supply. Historically the Company’s strategy for growth focused on internal growth and the acquisition of smaller distributors and businesses offering related products and services to the dental market. In fiscal 2002, the Company expanded its strategy to take advantage of a parallel growth opportunity in the veterinary supply market by acquiring the assets of J. A. Webster, Inc. on July 9, 2001. The Company added a third component to its business platform in fiscal 2004 when it entered the rehabilitation supply market with the acquisition of AbilityOne Products Corp. (“AbilityOne”) on September 12, 2003. AbilityOne is now known as Patterson Medical.

The historical operating performance of the veterinary supply and rehabilitation supply businesses are somewhat different than the dental supply business. Operating margins of the veterinary business are considerably lower than the dental supply business. While operating expenses run at a lower rate in the veterinary business, its gross margin is substantially lower. Veterinary gross margins have been in the low-to-mid 20’s as compared to dental gross margins in the mid 30’s. The rehabilitation business has realized gross margins in the high 30’s to low 40’s.

There are several important aspects of the Company’s business that are useful in analyzing the Company, including: (1) market growth in the various markets it operates; (2) internal growth; (3) growth through acquisition; and (4) continued focus on controlling costs and enhancing efficiency, that are useful in analyzing the Company.efficiency. Management defines “internal growth” as the increase in net sales from period to period, excluding the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, and excluding the net sales, for a period of twelve months following the transaction date, of businesses that it has acquired. With these factors in mind, management has established certain operating objectives, which include increasing net sales two to four percentage points faster than the average market growth rate at each business unit and improving operating margins by 50 basis points annually. In response to lower-than-expected operating results at Patterson Medical,

During fiscal 2008, the Company putexecuted a new management team into place during the second halfseries of fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2007,transactions that effectively changed our capital structure, that lowered our weighted average cost of capital by almost 100 basis points, and positioned the Company committedto increase returns to our shareholders. First, the Company repurchased approximately 18 million shares of its common stock on the open market and through an accelerated share repurchase agreement for a total of approximately $636 million. A portion of its operating leverage improvement to investmentsthe funding for the share repurchases came from debt issued in the sales and marketing organization at Patterson Medical, which entailed a significant expansionfourth quarter of the sales force as well as other marketing initiatives.year, consisting of fixed-rate private placement notes totaling $450 million and a variable-rate term loan from a group of banks of $75 million. The actionspositive impact of this share repurchase activity in fiscal 2007 at Patterson Medical were expectedthe fourth quarter was largely offset by increased interest expense and lower cash reserves, however the Company estimates the accretion to diminish the opportunity to expand operating margins by 50 basis points. In addition, fiscal 2007 operating results include expense of $7.8 millionearnings per share from the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123(R) at the beginning of the year.share repurchases going forward to be approximately $0.08 annually.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the consolidated results of operations over the past three fiscal years as a percent of sales:

 

   2007 (a)  2006  2005 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales

  65.4% 65.0% 64.4%
          

Gross margin

  34.6% 35.0% 35.6%

Operating expenses

  22.6% 22.6% 23.1%
          

Operating income

  12.0% 12.4% 12.5%

Other income, net

  0.3% 0.2% 0.2%

Interest expense

  0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
          

Income before taxes

  11.8% 12.1% 12.1%

Income taxes

  4.3% 4.5% 4.5%
          

Net income

  7.5% 7.6% 7.6%
          

   2008 (a)  2007 (a)  2006 

Net sales

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales

  65.6% 65.4% 65.0%
          

Gross margin

  34.4% 34.6% 35.0%

Operating expenses

  22.4% 22.6% 22.6%
          

Operating income

  12.0% 12.0% 12.4%

Other income, net

  0.3% 0.3% 0.2%

Interest expense

  0.4% 0.5% 0.5%
          

Income before taxes

  11.9% 11.8% 12.1%

Income taxes

  4.4% 4.3% 4.5%
          

Net income

  7.5% 7.5% 7.6%
          

(a)Includes a 30 basis point impact of share-based compensation expense from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in, which was adopted effective April 30, 2006, the first day of fiscal 2007.

Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007

Net Sales. Consolidated sales in fiscal 2008 totaled $2,998.7 million, an increase of 7.2% compared to $2,798.4 million in fiscal 2007. Foreign currency translation rates contributed one percentage point and acquisitions contributed 0.6% to the sales growth in fiscal 2008.

Sales of our dental supply unit increased 5.7% to $2,181.3 million. Sales of dental consumable supplies grew 5.5%. Dental equipment sales grew 4.2%, including basic equipment growth of 4.3%. Sales of CEREC® 3D dental restorative systems rose 3.7%. In late fiscal 2007, CEREC’s manufacturer, Sirona, introduced improved software included in all installations and a next-generation crown milling chamber that is sold both as an upgrade for existing installations and as an option on new system sales. The process of transitioning to these upgraded features began in late fiscal 2007 and continued into early fiscal 2008. Total CEREC sales in the first half of fiscal 2008 declined, while sales improved approximately 12% in the second half of the year.

Other dental sales, consisting primarily of technical service parts and labor, software support services and artificial teeth, grew 11.7% in fiscal 2008.

Webster Veterinary sales grew 11.8% to $446.4 million from $399.4 million. Effective January 2007, Webster made a strategic decision to drop a line of products previously sold under an agency agreement, including flea/tick and heartworm products, and replaced them with a combination of fully distributed product offerings and products under agency agreements from several vendor partners. This transition progressed throughout the year as planned, although there was a modest negative impact to Webster’s operating metrics during the first half of fiscal 2008.

Veterinary equipment and software sales accounted for approximately 7% of Webster’s total sales during the past two fiscal years. In the second half of fiscal 2008, efforts were underway to restructure and refine this aspect of the business and the Company believes equipment and software sales will benefit from these initiatives in fiscal 2009.

Sales growth of 11.0% at Patterson Medical included the contribution of new branch offices which have been established by acquisition and greenfield expansion. As a part of its initiative to expand and strengthen its value-added model, the rehabilitation unit has opened twelve branch offices in selected markets throughout the

United States over the past two years. Certain acquisitions over the past two years have given the business access to premium equipment lines previously unavailable to Patterson Medical. The November 2007 acquisition of PTOS software, a leading line of practice management software for physical therapists, is enabling Patterson Medical to create relationships with new customers and deepen relationships with existing customers.

Gross Margin.Consolidated gross margin of 34.4% was 20 basis points lower in fiscal 2008 due to declines at Patterson Medical and Webster Veterinary. In addition, the sales growth of Webster outpaced both the dental and rehabilitation segments, resulting in a dilutive impact to consolidated gross margin, since Veterinary gross margins are lower than the other two businesses.

The Dental segment’s gross margin was flat, despite approximately $2 million of expense related to a distribution agreement fee which began to be amortized in October 2007. In addition, local currency pricing in Canada was lowered in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 in response to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar compared to the United States dollar.

Gross margins decreased by 50 basis points in fiscal 2008 at the Veterinary unit. This was largely a result of the decision to terminate the agency relationship late in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, (the agency commission is effectively 100% gross margin), and many of the replacement offerings for the products previously sold under the agency relationship are now being fully distributed. While gross margin decreased in each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2008 compared to the year-earlier quarters, respectively, gross margin improved 110 basis points in the fourth quarter due to product mix and higher vendor rebates.

Patterson Medical’s gross margin declined 20 basis points, due mostly to higher freight costs in the early part of fiscal 2008. In the second half of the year, better freight management and product pricing mitigated much of the higher freight costs.

Operating Expenses. The consolidated operating expense ratio improved 20 basis points to 22.4%.

Operating expenses as a percent of sales at the Dental unit decreased 30 basis points, reflecting the leverage of infrastructure investments over the past two years and the elimination of duplicate costs from the distribution system. The operating expense ratio of the Veterinary unit declined 50 basis points due both to leverage on higher sales volume and distribution system realignment, including the closing of a stand-alone warehouse.

Patterson Medical’s operating expense ratio was 100 basis points higher in fiscal 2008, resulting from the infrastructure expense of adding branch locations through both acquisition and internal startups. This impact on the operating expense ratio is expected to dissipate as the newer locations become more established.

Operating Income. Operating income was $359.2 million or 12.0% of net sales in fiscal 2008. This amount represents an increase of 7.0% from $335.7 million in fiscal 2007. Operating margin in fiscal 2007 was also 12.0%.

Interest Expense.Interest expense was $12.8 million compared to $14.2 million in fiscal 2007. The average debt balance carried for the majority of fiscal 2008 was lower than in fiscal 2007, resulting in the decrease in interest expense. The Company issued $525 million of long-term debt in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and thus, a significantly higher level of interest expense is expected in fiscal 2009.

Other Income, net. Other income, net of other expenses, increased to $11.0 million from $8.1 million due to higher levels of interest income and foreign currency transaction gains.

Income Taxes.The effective income tax rate was 37.1% in fiscal 2008, slightly higher than a rate of 36.8% in the prior year.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share.Net income increased 7.9% to $224.9 million. Earnings per diluted share of $1.69 represents an increase of $0.18 or 11.9% from the $1.51 earnings per share reported in fiscal 2007.

Approximately 18 million shares of common stock were repurchased in the second half of fiscal 2008. Since these shares were purchased late in the fiscal year, and the Company borrowed funds to help finance the share repurchases, the resulting net impact on the earnings per diluted share in fiscal 2008 was approximately 1 to 2 cents. The full impact on earnings per diluted share from the repurchases is expected to be approximately 8 cents of accretion.

Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended April 28, 2007 totaled $2,798.4 million, an increase of 7.0% from $2,615.1 million in fiscal 2006. The favorable impact of foreign currency translation on sales growth was 0.5%. Acquisitions contributed approximately one percentage point to sales growth.

The Company acquired Accu-Bite, a dental supplier, in September 2005. This business included both a field sales organization similar to our traditional dental sales model, as well as a low-margin telesales business. For approximately eight months of fiscal 2006, from the date of acquisition through the end of fiscal year, the dental segment operated Accu-Bite’s telesales business. In early May 2006, the telesales operations were closed for business reasons.reasons, including continuing losses from operations. In closing the business, as much of the sales volume thatas could be, was moved into the field organization. However, as the Company expected, much of this sales volume went to dental suppliers who approach the market with a low-price model. The closing of the telesales business had a negative impact on consolidated fiscal 2007 sales growth of approximately one percentage point.

Sales of our dental supply unit increased 5.0% in fiscal 2007 to $2,064.6 million. Sales of dental consumable supplies grew 5.7%. The Accu-Bite telesales negative impact on sales growth of the dental unit’s total sales and sales of consumable supplies was approximately 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Equipment sales grew 1.6%, led by basic equipment growth of 6.1%. Largely offsetting the increase in basic equipment growth was a decline in the sales of CEREC® 3D dental restorative systems.

Late in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, CEREC’s manufacturer, Sirona, introduced several important enhancements. First, CEREC’s software was significantly improved; making it easier to design highly aesthetic and precise restorations, while also greatly streamlining the system’s learning curve. In addition, a faster and more robust milling unit was introduced as an option on new installations, as well as an upgrade to all existing CEREC users. The Company believes the news of the impending enhancements to CEREC, which reached the market early in fiscal 2007, as well as the timing of the introduction at the end of the third fiscal quarter, and the process of transitioning to these upgraded features, which was still underway at the end of fiscal 2007, hadhas a negative impact on sales throughout the year.

Other dental sales, consisting primarily of technical service parts and labor, software support services and teeth, grew 14.1% in fiscal 2007.

Sales at the Webster Veterinary unit grew 15.4% to $399.4 million from $346.1 million. The business has strategically emphasized expansion of its value-added platform, including its equipment and software initiatives. Webster’s core consumables business performed well throughout the year and equipment and software increased 69.6%. Excluding the acquisition impact of Intra Corp, developer and marketer of IntraVet® practice management software, total veterinary sales exceeded prior year sales by 14.2%.

Patterson Medical consistently grew sales throughout the year, improving 10.7% over fiscal 2006. Three acquisitions related to the unit’s branch office strategy contributed 3 percentage points of the growth and foreign currency translation added an additional 1.5% of sales improvement. During fiscal 2007, Patterson Medical established five full-service branch offices in selected markets through acquisitions and internal start-ups. Additional acquisitions and internal start-ups are under consideration asAlso, the business continuescontinued to increase its sales force and add programs and systems to advance their value-added offerings.

Gross Margin.Consolidated gross margin declined 40 basis points in fiscal 2007 to 34.6%, primarily due to lower margins ofat Patterson Medical. In addition, the sales growth of Webster Veterinary outpaced both the dental and rehabilitation segments, resulting in a dilutive impact to consolidated gross margin, since Veterinary gross margins are lower than the other two businesses.

The Dental segment’s gross margin improved 20 basis points in fiscal 2007. The closing of the Accu-Bite telesales business which operated for eight months in fiscal 2006 and was dilutive to overall dental gross margin during that period, acted to improve Dental gross margins in 2007. The telesales business produced substantially lower gross margins than the traditional dental sales operations. A decline in sales of the high-margin CEREC dental restorative systems during fiscal 2007 negatively impacted gross margin.

The gross margin of the Veterinary business decreased by 10 basis points overcompared to fiscal year 2006. The negative impact on gross margin of lower agency commissions and vendor rebates in fiscal 2007 was mostly offset by the sales growth of equipment and software, which carry higher margins than core consumables.

Patterson Medical’s gross margin declined 250 basis points due to several factors. Higher freight costs have impacted this business more than the Dental and Veterinary segments due to the nature of the average order size and related package levels. In addition, this segment hashad fixed price contracts with certain large group customers and price increases from vendors created some margin compression in this customer group. These contracts are renewed periodically, at which time pricing may be renegotiated to address changes in vendor pricing. Many of the contracts were amended in the latter part of fiscal 2007. A third factor in the gross margin decline at Patterson Medical is that the business hired a number of new sales representatives during the past fiscal year who havehad been given some short-term latitude to establish their book of business through discretionary discounting. This latitude will be phased out as these new representatives reach their sales targets.

Operating Expenses. The consolidated operating expense ratio remained unchanged from a year ago at 22.6%, however the ratio in fiscal 2007 was negatively impacted by 30 basis points due to $7.8 million of share-based compensation expense related to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in fiscal 2007.

Excluding the impact of SFAS No. 123(R), the Dental segment experienced a 10 basis point improvement in its operating expense ratio. The Veterinary segment experienced a 60 basis points decrease in its operating expense ratio, due primarily to leverage on sales growth. In addition, during fiscal 2006 the business incurred costs from the initial expense structure of its greenfield expansion into California. Fiscal 2007 was a year of investment for Patterson Medical in sales and marketing personnel and programs, however the business was able to maintain their operating expense ratio due to growth in sales.

Operating Income. Operating income was $335.7 million, or 12.0% of net sales. Excluding $7.8 million of expense under SFAS No. 123(R), operating income was 12.3% of net sales, totaling $343.4 million, an increase of 6.3% from $323.0 million in fiscal 2006.

Interest Expense.Interest expense was $14.2 million compared to $13.4 million in fiscal 2006. For more than half of fiscal 2006, an interest rate swap on $100 million of variable rate debt effectively fixed interest rate expense on the $100 million at 2.6% until the agreement terminated in November 2005. The average debt balance carried in fiscal 2007 was lower than fiscal 2006; however, the weighted average interest rate on the $100 million of variable rate debt was approximately 6.0% in fiscal 2007, resulting in an overall increase in interest expense.

Other Income, net. Other income, net of other expenses, increased to $8.1 million from $7.3 million. Composed primarily of finance interest income in both years, the increase was due primarily to higher interest rates.

Income Taxes.The effective income tax rate was 36.8% in fiscal year 2007 compared to 37.4% in the prior year. During fiscal 2007, the Company finalized several years of Canadian income tax returns and the reversal of

related tax reserves lowered the effective income tax rate by approximately one percentage point. The impact of SFAS No. 123(R) on our effective tax rate partially offset the finalization of the Canadian tax returns since certain compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R) is non-deductible.

Net Income and Earnings Perper Share.EarningsNet income was $208.3, an increase of 5.0% from fiscal 2006. Fiscal 2007 earnings per diluted share of $1.51 represents an increase ofwere $0.08 or 5.6% from thehigher than $1.43 earnings per share reported in fiscal 2006. The adoptionsadoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in fiscal 2007 lowered earnings per share by $0.05.

Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended April 29, 2006 totaled $2,615.1 million, an 8.0% increase from $2,421.5 million reported for the previous year. The Company utilizes a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in April. Due to the Company’s fiscal year policy, fiscal 2005 included an additional or fifty-third week as compared to fiscal 2006. The Company estimates the additional week in fiscal 2005 had a one to two percentage point adverse impact on the growth rate in fiscal 2006.

Sales of our largest business unit, dental supply, increased 7.2%. Excluding the impact of the Accu-Bite acquisition and favorable foreign currency exchange translation related to our Canadian operations, sales grew approximately 4% in fiscal 2006.

Sales of dental consumable supplies experienced strong growth of 9.5%. Excluding the 4.1 percentage point impact to growth from the Accu-Bite acquisition, and considering the additional week in fiscal 2005, consumables growth was on the high end of our of estimated market growth rate of 5% to 7%. Equipment sales growth of 3.7% was below historic norms. In the second half of fiscal 2006, programs were implemented to improve the sluggish sales performance for basic equipment, such as chairs, units, cabinetry and lights, back to more historic growth rates.

With respect to new-technology equipment, digital radiography continued to see significant practitioner demand and related sales grew 20% compared to fiscal 2005. Sales of the CEREC® 3D dental restorative system were virtually unchanged from fiscal 2005.

Sales of other services and products, including parts, technical service, software support and insurance e-claims, grew 8.2% in fiscal 2006.

Sales at the Webster Veterinary unit grew 18.6% to $346.1 million from $292.0 million. The impact from the October 2004 Milburn and December 2005 IntraVet acquisitions was approximately $24.7 million, or 8.5 percentage points of the growth. Webster’s sales growth was strong throughout the year and was complimented by several factors. First, the business began its greenfield expansion into the large California market, which represents its most successful greenfield initiative to date. Second, for the past few years, Webster has been

laying the groundwork for expanding its position in the equipment market and this growing emphasis resulted in strong results. Equipment sales for the year grew 49% from fiscal 2005. Finally, another source of growth in fiscal 2006 sales were new pharmaceutical distribution agreements, including a canine pain medication previously sold direct by the manufacturer.

Patterson Medical’s sales growth was only 2.3%. A modest improvement in North American sales was largely offset by a slight decline in sales of the overseas operations. In the second half of fiscal 2006, a new management team was put in place and a range of strategic initiatives were begun. Late in the third quarter, a small, non-core portion of the segment was sold which also negatively impacted the growth rate of sales.

Gross Margin.Consolidated gross margin declined 60 basis points in fiscal 2006 to 35.0%. Sales from the Webster Veterinary unit made up a larger portion of sales in fiscal 2006 due to its strong sales growth. Because gross margin at the Veterinary unit is lower than both the Dental and Medical units, the unit’s sales growth had a dilutive effect on consolidated gross margin.

The Dental unit’s gross margin decrease of nearly 50 basis points was largely due to the acquisition of Accu-Bite. Acquired territory sales reps were integrated within existing Patterson branches, however, Accu-Bite also had a telesales operation that was not integrated and produced substantially lower gross margins than the traditional dental sales operations. The telesales business was shutdown in early May of 2006, however, it did operate from the September 2005 date of acquisition through the end of fiscal 2006.

The gross margin of the Veterinary business was virtually unchanged. A full year of Milburn operations, which carry lower margins than the historical Webster business, were included in fiscal 2006 results compared to approximately six months in fiscal 2005 and negatively impacted the overall gross margin of the unit. However, this impact was largely offset by the sales growth of equipment and software, which carry higher margins than the rest of the unit’s product offerings.

Patterson Medical’s gross margin fell 100 basis points, largely due to sales mix, including lower sales levels of the overseas operations, which have carried higher gross margins than the North American operations.

Operating Expenses. The consolidated operating expense ratio decreased to 22.6%, down 50 basis points from 23.1% in fiscal 2005.

The Dental segment experienced a 30 basis point decrease, reflecting operating leverage on additional sales and reduced incentive compensation. This improvement was partially offset by costs associated with the integration of the Accu-Bite acquisition.

The Veterinary segment also improved its operating expense ratio by 30 basis points, due primarily to operating leverage on improved sales. Costs associated with the initial expense structure of the California greenfield expansion somewhat offset this improvement.

The operating expense ratio at Patterson Medical declined by 170 basis points due to lower levels of amortization of intangibles.

Consolidated amortization expense in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 was $7.0 million and $12.2 million, respectively. The $5.2 million decrease was due primarily to amortization on certain intangible assets related to the acquisition of Patterson Medical, some of which were being amortized on an accelerated basis due to their period of benefit.

Operating Income. Operating income increased 6.9% and decreased 10 basis points as a percent of sales. As discussed above, consolidated gross margins declined 60 basis points, while the consolidated operating expense ratio improved 50 basis points.

Interest Expense.Interest expense decreased from $15.1 million to $13.4 million. The average debt balance carried in fiscal 2006 was lower than in fiscal 2005 because the Company paid down substantial amounts of debt near the end of fiscal 2005. However, in November 2005, an interest rate swap on $100 million of variable rate debt terminated. This swap had existed throughout all of fiscal 2005 and under the terms of the agreement, the Company effectively paid a low, fixed rate on the variable rate debt. Due to the termination of the swap agreement and rising interest rates, the Company experienced a higher weighted average interest rate in fiscal 2006 and was not able to recognize significantly lower levels of interest expense as compared to fiscal 2005.

Other Income, net. Other income, net of other expenses, was consistent year over year. Composed primarily of finance interest income in both years, net other income was $7.3 million in fiscal 2006 compared to $6.5 million in fiscal 2005 and results primarily from the growth of the business.

Income Taxes.The effective income tax rate was 37.4% in both fiscal years 2006 and 2005. The Company’s effective tax rate is higher than the statutory federal rate primarily because of state, local and international taxes the Company must pay.

Earnings Per Share.Earnings per share increased to $1.43, up $0.11 or 8% from the $1.32 earnings per share reported in fiscal 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Patterson’s operating cash flow hashad been the Company’s principal source of liquidity in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, and 2005.until the issuance of $525 million of debt in the March 2008. Operating activities generated cash of $265.4 million in fiscal 2008 compared with $243.5 million in fiscal 2007 compared withand $164.0 million in fiscal 2006 and $207.3 million in fiscal 2005.2006. In fiscal 2006, the Company did not sell approximately $30 million of short-duration finance contracts that were generated as a part of our traditional calendar year-end financing programs. These contracts havehad an average maturity of less than 24 months and will generategenerated interest income at rates approximating what cash would earn, thus the Company elected not to incur the administrative expense of selling these contracts. Had these contracts been sold, cash from operations would have been approximately $200 million. The majority of the principal balance on these contracts has been collected from customers as of fiscal 2007 year end.

Capital expenditures were $36.0, $19.5 $49.2 and $31.5$49.2 million in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Fiscal 2008 significant expenditures included the expansion of our general office building, expansion of an existing distribution center to accommodate multiple business units, the purchase of a distribution center that had been under a short-term lease, and 2005, respectively.continuing investments in information systems. The expansions of the office building and distribution center were in progress as of April 26, 2008. Fiscal 2006 included several significant projects, including expenditures for shared distribution centers in Kent, WA and eastern Pennsylvania. In addition, 2006 included expenditures for a new distribution facility for the Patterson Medical operations in the U.K.

The Company expects to invest approximately $30 to $35 million in capital expenditures during fiscal 2008,2009, including the expansioncompletion of an existing distribution center to accommodate multiple business units,the two projects in progress as of April 26, 2008 and the continuing expansion ofinvestments in information systems.

Two buildings were sold during fiscal 2007, with proceeds totaling $9.2 million. One building was the former distribution facility for Patterson Medical’s U.K. operations and the other was a vacant building acquired in the acquisition of AbilityOne.

Cash used for acquisitions totaled $12.7$22.7 million in fiscal 20072008 and included acquisition in all three business units, with the acquisition of threemajority being local and regional dealer/distributors by Patterson Medical as well as earn-outsin the rehabilitation supply business.

Payments on acquisitions from previous years. The $39.2 million investedlong-term debt in fiscal 2006 included the acquisitions of Accu-Bite and IntraCorp.2008 were $50 million. In fiscal 2005,March 2008, the Company used $72.9closed on $525 million of cashlong-term debt financing which was comprised of $450 million of fixed-rate private notes with maturities of five, seven and ten years in addition to a $75 million term loan at a floating rate of interest through a group of banks. The Company used $250 million of the debt financing to repurchase shares under an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”). The remaining proceeds from the debt issuances were used to repay borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit agreement and for acquisitions, including Medco, CAESY and Milburn.

A cash paymentgeneral corporate purposes. $130 million of $100 million was made to Sironadebt issued in fiscal 2006, representing a distribution fee that extends2004 becomes due in November 2008. As of April 26, 2008, no amounts are outstanding under the Company’s exclusive North American distribution agreement of Sirona’s CEREC equipment for a ten-year periodrevolving credit facility which begins in October 2007.

The Company did not repurchase any of its common stockexpires in fiscal years 2007, 2006 or 2005, but does have authorization from2013. A total of $300 million is available under this facility.

During the boardsecond half of directors to repurchase up to six million shares. This authorization expires September 30, 2009. During fiscal 2007,2008, the Company loaned its ESOP $105 million, which was used by the ESOP to purchase approximately 3.2 millionpurchased shares of the Company’sits common stock on the open market.

Payments on long-term debt were $120market, under a 25 million inshare repurchase program authorized by the board of directors. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. In addition to $70 million of fixed rate debt that matured during the year and $20 million of scheduled payments on its variable rate bank term loans,2008, the Company entered into an ASR under which it paid off$250 million and took an initial delivery of 6.3 million shares. In total, the remaining $30Company repurchased approximately 18 million shares for $636.1 million during fiscal 2008. Under the terms of the term loans nearASR, the endCompany could have received additional shares, or could have been required to pay the counterparty in the form of either cash or shares. The final settlement of the fiscal year. An amount of $200ASR occurred in June 2008, with an additional 1.1 million is availableshares being delivered to the Company. After the June 2008 settlement, an additional 5.9 million shares may be repurchased under the current authorization by the board of directors,

which expires on December 31, 2012. Going forward, in the absence of desirable acquisition opportunities, the Company under this revolving credit facility until November 2008. For fiscal 2008, $50 millionwould likely return excess cash to its shareholders through additional open market purchases of fixed rate private notes loan repayments are scheduled.its common stock, or possibly consider a dividend strategy.

Management continues to expectexpects funds generated from operations and existing cash and short-term investments to be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital needs for the next fiscal year. The Company expects to continue to obtain liquidity from the sale of its equipment finance contracts. In addition, as of April 26, 2008, $300 million is available under a revolving credit facility. The Company’s short-term and long-term debt facilities are believed to be adequate as a supplement to internally generated cash flows to fund anticipated expansion plans and strategic initiatives.

The Company sells a significant portion of its installment sale contracts to a commercial paper funded conduit managed by a third party bank, and as a result, commercial paper is indirectly an important source of liquidity for the Company. The Company is allowed to participate in the conduit due to the quality of its finance contracts and its financial strength. Cash flow could be impaired if the Company’s financial strength diminished to a level that precluded the Company from taking part in this facility or other similar facilities. Also, market conditions outside of the Company’s control could adversely affect the ability of the Company to sell the contracts. The Company’s financing business is described in further detail in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Contractual Obligations

A summary of the Company’s contractual obligations as of April 28, 200726, 2008 follows (in thousands):

 

  Payment due by year  Payment due by year

Contractual Obligations

  Total  

Less than

1 year

  1-3 years  3-5 years  

More than

5 years

  Total  Less than
1 year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than
5 years

Long-Term Debt

  $180,024  $50,014  $130,010   —     —    $655,034  $130,010  $24  $125,000  $400,000

Operating Leases

   52,079   12,633   22,396  $12,059  $4,991   49,115   13,668   21,808   11,003   2,636

As discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 at the beginning of fiscal 2008. The Company is unable to determine its contractual obligations by year related to this pronouncement, as the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of its reserves for income taxes cannot be reasonably estimated. The total liability for unrecognized tax benefits at April 26, 2008, is $22,689.

In addition, the Company is contractually committed to approximately $15 million of capital expenditures relating to two projects that are in-process as of April 26, 2008. Completion of these projects is expected to occur in fiscal 2009. For a more complete description of our contractual obligations, please see Notes 7 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Outlook

Over the last ten years, the Company has been able to grow revenue and earnings through its strategy of emphasizing its value-added, full-service capabilities, using technology to enhance customer service, continuing to improve operating efficiencies, and growing through internal expansion and acquisitions. The Company’s growth strategy will continue to focus on these key elements. Maintaining financial flexibility is also a key component of the Company’s future growth. With strong operating cash flow and available credit capacity, the Company is confident that it will be able to financially support its future growth. The strategic initiatives that the Company has implemented in the past two years, as well as those that will be implemented in fiscal 20082009 and beyond, will strengthen the Company’s operational platform and contribute to continuing future growth. Given these factors, the Company considers itself well positioned to capitalize upon the growth opportunities in the dental supply, companion-pet veterinary supply and the worldwide rehabilitation supply markets.

In June 2008, the Company’s dental unit announced several changes to its sales and marketing strategies. These changes are being made in an effort to further differentiate the dental unit from its competitors by taking advantage of the unit’s strengths in the marketplace. One of the changes being made is to provide, at no charge, the EagleSoft practice management software module to any dental practitioner not currently using the product. The Companydental management believes that there are numerous opportunities that arise to expand existing, or establish new, relationships with dental practitioners through this offer. However, the sustainable, long-term growth rateCompany could be adversely impacted by the decision to give up the revenue from the practice management software if other forms of its North Americanrevenue generated from the expanded or new relationships are not sufficient to offset the previously recognized software revenues. In fiscal 2008, software unit revenues accounted for less than 1% of consolidated dental operation is four percentage points in excess of the market’s 7% to 9% estimated rate of growth. The Company also believes its Webster

Veterinary and Patterson Medical units can grow faster than the estimated 6% to 7% growth rate of the U.S. companion-pet veterinary supply market and the estimated 6% growth rate of the rehabilitation market.revenues.

Asset Management

The following table summarizes the Company’s days sales outstanding (DSO) and inventory turnover the past three fiscal years:

 

   2007  2006  2005

Days sales outstanding

  44  47  46

Inventory turnover(1)

  7.2  7.3  7.9

   2008  2007  2006

Days sales outstanding

  43  44  47

Inventory turnover(1)

  6.8  7.2  7.3

(1)The inventory values used in this calculation are the LIFO inventory values for all inventories except for manufactured inventories and foreign inventories, which are valued using FIFO inventory methods.

Foreign Operations

Foreign sales are derived primarily from Patterson Dental and Patterson Medical operations in Canada and from Patterson Medical’s operations in the U.K. and France. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates have not significantly impacted earnings. However, net sales in fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 were enhanced by changes in the exchange rate.rates. Without foreign currency effects, net sales would have been $27.0 million, $12.3 million $9.3 million and $12.6$9.3 million lower in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively. The effect in fiscal 2008 was mostly driven by the strengthening of the Canadian Dollar as compared to the United States Dollar. Changes in currency exchange rates are a risk accompanying foreign operations, but this risk is not considered material with respect to the netconsolidated operations of the Company’s business.Company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company has adopted various accounting policies to prepare its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Management believes that the Company’s policies are conservative and its philosophy is to adopt accounting policies that minimize the risk of adverse events having a material impact on recorded assets and liabilities. However, the preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates and judgments regarding the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities based on the information available to management at the time. Changes subsequent to the preparation of the financial statements in economic, technological and competitive conditions may materially impact the recorded values of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Therefore, the users of the financial statements should read all the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and be aware that conditions currently unknown to management may develop in the future. This may require a material adjustment to a recorded asset or liability to consistently apply the Company’s significant accounting principles and policies that are discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The financial performance and condition of the Company may also be materially impacted by transactions and events that the Company has not previously experienced and for which the Company has not been required to establish an accounting policy or adopt a generally accepted accounting principle.

Revenue Recognition—Our revenue recognition processes involve establishing estimates for returns, damaged goods, rebates and other revenue allowances. These estimates are based on historical experience and the facts known at the date of the preparation of the financial statements, but future events could cause actual results to vary from our estimates.

Inventory and Reserves—Inventory consists primarily of merchandise held for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for all inventories, except for foreign inventories and manufactured inventories, which are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. WeThe Company continually assessassesses the valuation of our inventories and reduce the carrying value of those inventories that are

obsolete or in excess of our forecasted usage to estimated realizable value. We estimateEstimate are made of the net realizable value of such inventories based on analyses and assumptions including, but not limited to, historical usage, future demand and market requirements.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets—AssetsGoodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets include customer lists, a distribution agreement and other amortizable intangible assets. In addition, other intangible assets consist of trademarks andcopyrights, trade names that are unamortized intangible assets.and trademarks.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)(“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), requires that goodwill for each reporting unit be reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company has three reporting units at April 28, 2007.26, 2008, which are the same as our operating units. The Company tests goodwill for impairment using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS No. 142.

Fair value is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. The Company conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of present industry and economic conditions, as well as future expectations.

In the first step, the Company compares the fair value of each reporting unit, as computed primarily by present value cash flow calculations, to its book carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further work is required and no impairment loss is recognized. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company would then complete step 2 in order to measure the impairment loss. In step 2, the Company would calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets (including unrecognized intangible assets) of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit (as determined in step 1). If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference.

Management also reviews other intangible assets with finite lives for impairment at least annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate impairment. If the carrying value of the finite-lived intangible assets exceeds the expected undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use and disposition of the asset, the carrying value is written down to fair value in the period identified. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment by calculating the fair value of the assets and comparing with their carrying value. In assessing fair value, management generally utilizes present value cash flow calculations using an expected cash flow approach.

During the fourth quartersquarter of fiscal 2007 and 2006,2008, management completed its annual goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviewstests and determined there was no impairment. Management does not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions used to test for impairment losses on goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with no impairmentsour estimates or assumptions, the Company may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.

Long-Lived Assets—Long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values identified.amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from such assets. The Company’s definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of an exclusive distribution agreement and customer lists. When impairment exists, the related assets are written down to fair value. Although the Company believes our estimates and assumptions used in estimating cash flows and determining fair value are reasonable, making material changes to such estimates and assumptions could materially affect such impairment analyses and our financial results.

Income TaxesThe discount rateCompany is subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and sales growthnumerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments are required in determining the consolidated provision for income taxes.

During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a result, the Company recognizes tax liabilities based on estimates of whether additional taxes and interest will be due. These tax liabilities are recognized when, despite the Company’s belief that its tax return positions are supportable, the Company believes that certain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open audit years based on its assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of

tax law. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions areand may involve a series of complex judgments about future events. To the two most significant assumptions utilizedextent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact income tax expense in the Company’s calculationsperiod in which such determination is made and could materially affect our financial results.

To the extent that the provision for income taxes would have increased/decreased by 1 percent of the present value cash flows used to estimate the fair value of the reporting units when performing the annual goodwill impairment test andincome before taxes, consolidated net income would have decreased/increased $3.6 million in testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The Company utilizes an expected cash flow approach in estimating the fair value of the reporting units, where the discount reflects a risk-free rate of interest and utilizes various probability-weighted scenarios to estimate future sales. The cash flow model used to derive fair value is most sensitive to the discount rate and sales growth assumptions used. The estimated fair value of the reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets has historically exceeded the carrying value of such reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset by a substantial amount. The Company performs a sensitivity analysis on the discount rate, sales growth and operating margin assumptions. Either the discount rate could be increased by 50% of the discount rate utilized, or the sales growth assumption could be reduced by 20%, and the Company’s reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets would continue to have fair values in excess of the carrying values.fiscal 2008.

Share-based Compensation—The Company accounts for share-based payment awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). The Company recognizes share-based compensation based on certain assumptions including inputs within the Black-Scholes Model and estimated forfeitures. These assumptions require subjective judgment and changes in the assumptions can materially affect fair value estimates. Management assesses the assumptions and methodologies used to estimate forfeitures and to calculate estimated fair value of share-based compensation on a regular basis. Circumstances may change, and additional data may become available over time, which could result in changes to these assumptions and methodologies and thereby materially impact our fair value

determination or estimates of forfeitures. If factors change and the Company employs different assumptions in the application of SFAS No. 123(R), the amount of compensation expense associated with SFAS No. 123(R) may differ significantly from what was recorded in the current period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006,March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued InterpretationStatement No. 48,161,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,an interpretationamendment of FASSFAS No. 109133” (“FIN 48”SFAS No. 161”). FIN 48 clarifiesSFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 161 is expected at the beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” ("SFAS No. 141(R)"). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or expected to be takenbusiness combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired entity's deferred tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on future changes, classification, interestassets and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transition. FIN 48uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have completed2008 and will change our initial evaluationaccounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis.

In February 2007, FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective at the beginning of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 and determined that such adoption is not expected toSFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results from operations.statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.FAS(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASSFAS No. 157 applies under other previously issued accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. FASSFAS No. 157, isas originally issued, was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-b, which

deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and interim periods within thoseliabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to financial assets and liabilities will be effective at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal years. We are currently2009. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of FASSFAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements and related disclosures, but do not expect SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position or results of operations.

Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results

Certain information of a non-historical nature contained in Items 1, 2, 3 and 7 of this Form 10-K include forward-looking statements. Words such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” “intends” and variations of such words are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The statements are not guaranties of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties or assumptions that are difficult to predict; therefore, the Company cautions shareholders and prospective investors that the following important factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual operating results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The factors listed under this caption are intended to serve as cautionary statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The following information is not intended to limit in any way the characterization of other statements or information under other captions as cautionary statements for such purpose. The order in which such factors appear below should not be construed to indicate their relative importance or priority.

 

The Company’s ability to meet increased competition from national, regional and local full-service distributors and mail-order distributors of dental, veterinary and rehabilitation products, while maintaining current or improved profit margins.

 

The ability of the Company to effectuate modifications to the business models of its three operating units to address changes in the individual markets of those business units.

The ability of the Company to consolidate the distribution, information services, human resources, financial and other administrative functions of its three business units into jointly shared services which meet the needs of the individual business units.

The ability of the Company to manage rapidly changing energy and commodity prices.

The ability of the Company to retain its base of customers and to increase its market share.

 

The ability of the Company to maintain satisfactory relationships with qualified and motivated sales personnel.

 

The continued ability of the Company to maintain satisfactory relationships with key vendors and the ability of the Company to create relationships with additional manufacturers of quality, innovative products.

 

Changes in the economics of dentistry affecting dental practice growth and the demand for dental products, including the ability and willingness of dentists to invest in high-technology diagnostic and therapeutic products.

 

Reduced growth in expenditures for dental services by private dental insurance plans.

The accuracy of the Company’s assumptions concerning future per capita expenditures for dental services, including assumptions as to population growth and the demand for preventive and specialty dental services such as periodontic, endodontic and orthodontic procedures.

 

The rate of growth in demand for infection control products currently used for prevention of the spread of communicable diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis and herpes.

 

Changes in the economics of the veterinary supply market, including reduced growth in per capita expenditures for veterinary services and reduced growth in the number of households owning pets.

 

The effects of healthcare related legislation and regulation, which may affect expenditures or reimbursements for rehabilitation and assistive products.

Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk consisting of foreign currency rate fluctuations and changes in interest rates.

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in its operating statement due to transactions denominated primarily in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds and Euros. Although historically the Company has elected not to enter into any hedging contracts, it continually evaluates its foreign currency exchange rate risk and the different mechanisms for use in managing such risk. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Company’s most significant foreign currency exposures would have had an impact of approximately $23.0$29 million on fiscal 20072008 net sales, or approximately 1%.This amount is not indicative of the hypothetical net earnings impact due to the partially offsetting impact of the currency exchange movements on cost of sales and operating expenses.

The Company’s earnings are also affected by fluctuations in short-term interest rates through the investment of its cash balances, borrowings under LIBOR-based debt instruments and the practice of selling fixed rate equipment finance contracts under agreements with both a commercial paper conduit and a group of banks that provide for pricing based on variable interest rates.

As of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, the Company had $180$175 million of long-termvariable-rate debt outstanding, of which $100 million was variable interest rate based debt.becomes due in November 2008. The Company views its variable interest rate debt position on a net basis that gives effect to the Company’s cash and short term investments balances.

When considering the exposure under the agreements whereby the Company sells equipment finance contracts to both a commercial paper conduit and a group of banks, the Company has the ability to select pricing based on interest rates ranging from 30 day LIBOR up to twelve month LIBOR. In addition, the portfolio of installment contracts generally turns over in less than 48 months and the Company can adjust the rate it charges on new customer contracts at any time. Therefore, in times where the interest rate markets are not rapidly increasing or decreasing, the average interest rate in the portfolio generally moves with the interest rate markets and thus would parallel the underlying interest rate movement of the pricing built into the sale agreements. In calculating the gain on the contract sales, the Company uses an interest rate curve that approximates the maturity period of the then outstandingthen-outstanding contracts. If increases in the interest rate markets occur, the average interest rate in our contract portfolio may not increase at the same rate, resulting in a reduction of gain on the contractscontract sales as compared to the gain that would be realized if the average interest rate in our portfolio were to increase at a more similar rate to the interest rate markets. There could be a reverse effect, i.e. an increase in the gain, if the interest rate markets are declining.

The Company estimates that if interest rates had been 10% higher during the year, the annual impact would have been to reduce earnings before income tax by approximately $3 million.

Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Patterson Companies, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 9A,Controls and Procedures, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that Patterson Companies, Inc. maintained effective’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Patterson Companies, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 9A Controls and Procedures of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’sPatterson Companies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risks, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Patterson Companies, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Patterson Companies, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008 based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Patterson Companies, Inc. as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, and April 29, 2006,28, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended April 28, 2007 of Patterson Companies, Inc.26, 2008, and our report dated June 25, 200720, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

June 25, 200720, 2008

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Shareholders of Patterson Companies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Patterson Companies, Inc. as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, and April 29, 2006,28, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended April 28, 2007.26, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Patterson Companies, Inc. at April 28, 2007,26, 2008, and April 29, 2006,28, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended April 28, 2007,26, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth herein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective April 29, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Also, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective April 30, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Patterson Companies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated June 25, 200720, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

June 25, 200720, 2008

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(inIn thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  

April 28,

2007

 

April 29,

2006

   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 

ASSETS

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $241,791  $224,392   $308,164  $241,791 

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,547 and $7,031 at April 28, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively

   361,401   350,299 

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,030 and $6,547 at April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007, respectively

   364,050   361,401 

Inventory

   250,207   244,709    281,238   250,207 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   33,091   27,974    31,589   33,091 
              

Total current assets

   886,490   847,374    985,041   886,490 

Property and equipment, net

   131,952   141,541    148,932   131,952 

Long-term receivables, net

   52,019   49,277    54,392   52,019 

Goodwill

   660,573   656,206    681,352   660,573 

Identifiable intangibles, net

   102,357   108,008    200,398   202,357 

Distribution agreement

   100,000   100,000 

Other

   6,929   9,312    6,258   6,929 
              

Total assets

  $1,940,320  $1,911,718   $2,076,373  $1,940,320 
              

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      

Current liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $182,761  $173,957   $194,405  $182,761 

Accrued payroll expense

   54,101   34,111    51,560   54,101 

Other accrued expense

   86,348   85,396    90,092   86,348 

Income taxes payable

   4,245   26,156    —     4,245 

Current maturities of long-term debt

   50,014   90,027    130,010   50,014 
              

Total current liabilities

   377,469   409,647    466,067   377,469 

Long-term debt

   130,010   210,014    525,024   130,010 

Deferred income taxes

   53,627   49,536    57,806   53,627 

Other

   22,689   —   
              

Total liabilities

   561,106   669,197    1,071,586   561,106 

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Common Stock, $.01 par value:

Authorized shares—1,200,000

Issued and outstanding shares—139,490 and 138,751 at April 28, 2007, and April 29, 2006, respectively

   1,395   1,388 

Common Stock, $.01 par value:

   

Authorized shares—600,000

   

Issued and outstanding shares—122,357 and 139,490 at April 26, 2008, and April 28, 2007, respectively

   1,224   1,395 

Additional paid-in capital

   174,420   146,807    —     174,420 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   18,372   13,837    31,352   18,372 

Retained earnings

   1,308,590   1,100,254    1,093,974   1,308,590 

Notes receivable from ESOP

   (123,563)  (19,765)   (121,763)  (123,563)
              

Total stockholders’ equity

   1,379,214   1,242,521    1,004,787   1,379,214 
              

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $1,940,320  $1,911,718   $2,076,373  $1,940,320 
              

See accompanying notes

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  

April 28,

2007

 

April 29,

2006

 

April 30,

2005

   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 April 29,
2006
 

Net sales

  $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457   $2,998,729  $2,798,398  $2,615,123 

Cost of sales

   1,829,526   1,700,694   1,558,946    1,967,004   1,829,526   1,700,694 
                    

Gross profit

   968,872   914,429   862,511    1,031,725   968,872   914,429 

Operating expenses

   633,182   591,417   560,375    672,522   633,182   591,417 
                    

Operating income

   335,690   323,012   302,136    359,203   335,690   323,012 

Other income and expense:

        

Other income, net

   8,148   7,336   6,452    11,017   8,148   7,336 

Interest expense

   (14,230)  (13,375)  (15,141)   (12,792)  (14,230)  (13,375)
                    

Income before income taxes

   329,608   316,973   293,447    357,428   329,608   316,973 

Income taxes

   121,272   118,548   109,749    132,570   121,272   118,548 
                    

Net income

  $208,336  $198,425  $183,698   $224,858  $208,336  $198,425 
                    

Earnings per share:

        

Basic

  $1.52  $1.44  $1.34   $1.70  $1.52  $1.44 
                    

Diluted

  $1.51  $1.43  $1.32   $1.69  $1.51  $1.43 
                    

Weighted average shares:

        

Basic

   136,815   137,690   136,839    132,078   136,815   137,690 

Diluted

   137,769   139,234   138,873    132,910   137,769   139,234 

See accompanying notes

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained
Earnings
  Notes
Receivable
from ESOP
  Total  Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive
Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Notes
Receivable
from ESOP
  Total 
 Number Amount  Number Amount 

Balance at April 24, 2004

 68,450,336 $685 $100,995 $2,901  $718,818  $(21,641) $801,758 

Balance at April 30, 2005

 137,833,890  $1,378  $124,212  $8,519  $901,829  $(20,866) $1,015,072 

Derivative financial instrument change in unrealized gain

 —    —    —    251   —     —     251  —     —     —     (877)  —     —     (877)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 —    —    —    5,367   —     —     5,367 

Foreign currency translation

 —     —     —     6,195   —     —     6,195 

Net income

 —    —    —    —     183,698   —     183,698  —     —     —     —     198,425   —     198,425 
                  

Comprehensive income

        189,316         203,743 

Common stock issued

 625,574  6  20,217  —     —     —     20,223 

Stock split

 68,699,134  687  —    —     (687)  —     —   

Conversion of debenture

 58,846  —    3,000  —     —     —     3,000 

Payment on ESOP note

 —    —    —    —     —     775   775 
                  

Balance at April 30, 2005

 137,833,890  1,378  124,212  8,519   901,829   (20,866)  1,015,072 

Derivative financial instrument change in unrealized gain

 —    —    —    (877)  —     —     (877)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 —    —    —    6,195   —     —     6,195 

Net income

 —    —    —    —     198,425   —     198,425 
         

Comprehensive income

        203,743 

Common stock issued

 858,285  9  21,095  —     —     —     21,104 

Common stock issued and related tax benefits

 858,285   9   21,095   —     —     —     21,104 

Conversion of debenture

 58,846  1  1,500  —     —     —     1,501  58,846   1   1,500   —     —     —     1,501 

Payment on ESOP note

 —    —    —    —     —     1,101   1,101  —     —     —     —     —     1,101   1,101 
                                       

Balance at April 29, 2006

 138,751,021  1,388  146,807  13,837   1,100,254   (19,765)  1,242,521  138,751,021   1,388   146,807   13,837   1,100,254   (19,765)  1,242,521 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 —    —    —    4,535   —     —     4,535 

Foreign currency translation

 —     —     —     4,535   —     —     4,535 

Net income

 —    —    —    —     208,336   —     208,336  —     —     —     —     208,336   —     208,336 
                  

Comprehensive income

        212,871         212,871 

Common stock issued and related tax benefits

 739,225  7  19,856  —     —     —     19,863  739,225   7   19,856   —     —     —     19,863 

Share-based compensation

 —    —    7,757  —     —     —     7,757  —     —     7,757   —     —     —     7,757 

Loan to ESOP

 —    —    —    —     —     (105,000)  (105,000) —     —     —     —     —     (105,000)  (105,000)

Payment on ESOP note

 —    —    —    —     —     1,202   1,202  —     —     —     —     —     1,202   1,202 
                                       

Balance at April 28, 2007

 139,490,246 $1,395 $174,420 $18,372  $1,308,590  $(123,563) $1,379,214  139,490,246   1,395   174,420   18,372   1,308,590   (123,563)  1,379,214 

Foreign currency translation

 —     —     —     11,962   —     —     11,962 

Cash flow hedge

 —     —     —     1,018   —     —     1,018 

Net income

 —     —     —     —     224,858    224,858 
                           

Comprehensive income

        237,838 

Common stock issued and related tax benefits

 909,929   9   14,296   —     —     —     14,305 

Repurchases of common stock

 (18,043,533)  (180)  (196,439)   (439,474)   (636,093)

Share-based compensation

 —     —     7,723   —     —     —     7,723 

Payment on ESOP note

 —     —     —     —     —     1,800   1,800 
                     

Balance at April 26, 2008

 122,356,642  $1,224   —    $31,352  $1,093,974  $(121,763) $1,004,787 
                     

See accompanying notes

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   Fiscal Year Ended 
  

April 28,

2007

 

April 29,

2006

 

April 30,

2005

   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 April 29,
2006
 

Operating activities:

        

Net income

  $208,336  $198,425  $183,698   $224,858  $208,336  $198,425 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Depreciation

   19,791   16,693   14,648    19,492   19,791   16,693 

Amortization

   5,710   6,983   12,214    6,788   5,710   6,983 

Bad debt expense

   2,040   2,764   1,546    3,547   2,040   2,764 

Share-based compensation

   7,757   750   —      7,723   7,757   750 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

Deferred income taxes

   
 
(658
124
)
 
  3,860   840 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

   (778)  (658)  —   

Deferred income taxes

   13,146   124   3,860 

Change in assets and liabilities net of acquired:

        

Increase in receivables

   (12,246)  (24,112)  (31,365)   (3,282)  (12,246)  (24,112)

Increase in inventory

   (3,817)  (26,539)  (22,033)   (27,036)  (3,817)  (26,539)

Increase in accounts payable

   7,739   4,562   18,600    9,231   7,739   4,562 

Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities

   2,633   (560)  28,170    13,450   2,633   (560)

Increase in long-term receivables

   (2,742)  (15,704)  (7,733)   (2,373)  (2,742)  (15,704)

Other changes from operating activities, net

   8,838   (3,164)  8,720    613   8,838   (3,164)
                    

Net cash provided by operating activities

   243,505   163,958   207,305    265,379   243,505   163,958 

Investing activities:

        

Additions to property and equipment, net of acquisitions

   (19,507)  (49,153)  (31,533)   (35,991)  (19,507)  (49,153)

Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment

   9,163   —     —      —     9,163   —   

Distribution agreement

   —     (100,000)  —      —     —     (100,000)

Sale of investments

   —     35,062   16,777    —     —     35,062 

Purchase of investments

   —     (21,680)  (22,141)   —     —     (21,680)

Acquisitions, net of cash

   (12,665)  (39,228)  (72,855)   (22,694)  (12,665)  (39,228)
                    

Net cash used in investing activities

   (23,009)  (174,999)  (109,752)   (58,685)  (23,009)  (174,999)

Financing activities:

        

Payments of long-term debt

   (120,017)  (20,031)  (176,269)   (50,024)  (120,017)  (20,031)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   525,000   —     —   

Payments of debt issuance costs

   (1,813)  —     —   

Cash payments received on notes receivable from ESOP

   1,202   1,101   775    1,800   1,202   1,101 

Loan to ESOP

   (105,000)  —     —      —     (105,000)  —   

Repurchases of common stock

   (636,093)  —     —   

Common stock issued, net

   19,205   20,354   20,223    13,107   19,205   20,354 

Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation

   658   —     —      778   658   —   
                    

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

   (203,952)  1,424   (155,271)   (147,245)  (203,952)  1,424 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

   855   1,460   3,107    6,924   855   1,460 
                    

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   17,399   (8,157)  (54,611)   66,373   17,399   (8,157)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   224,392   232,549   287,160    241,791   224,392   232,549 
                    

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $241,791  $224,392  $232,549   $308,164  $241,791  $224,392 
                    

Supplemental disclosures:

        

Income taxes paid

  $143,183  $110,652  $90,815   $105,147  $143,183  $110,652 

Interest paid

   15,207   11,914   13,652    11,094   15,207   11,914 

Convertible debenture conversion

   —     1,500   3,000    —     —     1,500 

See accompanying notes

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APRIL 28, 200726, 2008

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Patterson Companies, Inc., “Patterson” or “the Company”, is a value-added distributor serving the dental, companion-pet veterinarian and rehabilitation supply markets. The Company has three reportable segments: dental supply, veterinary supply and rehabilitation supply.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The respective assets of PDC Funding Company, LLC and PDC Funding Company II, LLC, would be available first and foremost to satisfy the claims of their respective creditors. There are no known creditors of PDC Funding Company, LLC or PDC Funding Company II, LLC.

Fiscal Year End

The Company utilizes a fifty-two, fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in April. Accordingly, fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 included fifty-two weeks while fiscal year 2005 included fifty-three weeks.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist primarily of investments in money market funds, highly-rated commercial paper and government securities. The maturity of these securities at the time of purchase is 90 days or less. All cash equivalents are classified as available-for-sale and carried at market value, which approximates cost.

Inventory

Inventory consists of merchandise held for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for all inventories, except for foreign inventories and manufactured inventories, which are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories valued at LIFO represent 84%86% and 86%84% of total inventories at April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007, and April 29, 2006.respectively.

The accumulated LIFO reserve was $44,333 at April 26, 2008, and $39,309 at April 28, 2007, and $33,984 at April 29, 2006.2007. The Company believes that inventory replacement cost exceeds the inventory balance by an amount approximating the LIFO reserve.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. The Company provides depreciation on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings or the expected remaining life of purchased buildings, 3 to 20 years for leasehold improvements or the term of the lease, if less, 5 years for data processing equipment, and 5 to 10 years for office furniture and equipment.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer lists and other amortizable intangible assets and are amortized using estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 18 years. The net balance of amortizable intangible assets at April 28, 2007 is expected to be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately 5 years. Other intangible assets also include trademarks andcopyrights, trade names that are indefinite lived intangible assets.and trademarks.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)(“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), requires that goodwill for each reporting unit be reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company has three reporting units at April 28, 2007, consisting of its three26, 2008, which are the same as our operating segments.units. The Company tests goodwill for impairment using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS No. 142.

Fair value is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. The Company conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of present industry and economic conditions, as well as future expectations.

In the first step, the Company compares the fair valuefourth quarter of each reporting unit, determined primarily based on valuation studies performed by the Company, to its book carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further work is required and no impairment loss is recognized. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company would then complete step 2 in order to measure the impairment loss. In step 2, the Company would calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets (including unrecognized intangible assets) of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit (as determined in step 1). If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference.

Management also reviews other intangible assets for impairment at least annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate impairment. If the carrying value of other intangible assets exceeds the expected undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is written down to fair value in the period identified. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment by calculating the fair value of the assets and comparing with carrying value. In assessing fair value,fiscal 2008, management generally utilizes present value cash flow calculations using an expected cash flow approach.

The Company performedcompleted its annual goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests duringand determined there was no impairment. Management does not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the fourth quarters of fiscal 2007future estimates or assumptions used to test for impairment losses on goodwill and fiscal 2006 usingother indefinite-lived intangible assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, the methodologies described above. As a resultCompany may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the annualassets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from such assets. The Company’s definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of an exclusive distribution agreement and customer lists. When impairment tests performed,exists, the related assets are written down to fair value. Although the Company recorded nobelieves our estimates and assumptions used in estimating cash flows and determining fair value are reasonable, making material changes to such estimates and assumptions could materially affect such impairment loss.analyses and our financial results.

Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “AccountingAccounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “AccountingAccounting for Certain Derivative Instruments andCertain Hedging Activity, an Amendment of SFAS No. 133.133.” SFAS No. 133 and No. 138 require that all derivative financial instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their respective fair value.

The Company’s use of derivative financial instruments is generally limited to managing well-defined interest rate risks. The Company does not use financial instruments or derivatives for any trading or other speculative purposes.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Revenue Recognition

Revenues recognized include product sales, billings for freight and delivery charges, and fees earned for services provided. Consumable and printed product sales and billings for freight and delivery charges are recorded upon delivery, except in those circumstances where terms of the sale are FOB shipping point. Equipment and software product revenues are also recognized upon delivery. Revenues for these products are recorded upon delivery since at that time risk of loss has transferred to the customer, there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the price is fixed and final, and there is reasonable assurance of collection of the sales. In those circumstances where terms of the sale are FOB shipping point, revenues are recognized when products are transferred to the shipping carrier. Estimates for returns, damaged goods, rebates and other revenue allowances are made at the time of sale based on the historical experience for such items. Revenue derived from post contract customer support for software is deferred and recognized ratably over the period in which the support is provided. Other service revenues are recorded on the date services are completed.

Freight and Delivery Charges

Freight and delivery charges incurred by the Company are included in cost of sales.

Advertising

The Company expenses all advertising and promotional costs as incurred, except for direct marketing expenses, which are expensed over the shorter of the life of the asset or one year. Total advertising and promotional expenses were $22,665, $21,775, $22,435, and $20,736$22,435 for fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. Deferred direct-marketing expenses included in prepaid and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007 were $3,490 and April 29, 2006 were $3,198, and $3,433, respectively.

Distribution Agreement

In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company extended its exclusive North American distribution agreement with Sirona Dental Systems GmbH (“Sirona”) for Sirona’s CEREC 3D dental restorative system. The Company paid a $100 million distribution fee to extend the agreement for a 10-year period that begins in October 2007. The distribution fee is reflected as a non-current asset in the consolidated balance sheet. The amortization of this fee will occur over the 10-year period and will reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the fee are realized.

Income Taxes

The liability method is used to account for income tax expense. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Effective April 29, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). Details of the adoption are discussed in Note 10.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

Compensation expense related to the Company’s defined contribution ESOP is computed based on the shares allocated method.

Share-Based Compensation

Effective April 30, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123(R), “Share-based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company utilized the intrinsic value

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

method under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to EmployeeEmployee”. As permitted by SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has adopted the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. In accordance with the modified prospective method of adoption, the financial statement amounts for periods prior to April 30, 2006 have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of recognizing compensation cost.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is computed as net income plus certain other items that are recorded directly to stockholders’ equity. The only significant other item included in comprehensive income is foreign currency

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

translation adjustments. Foreign currency translation adjustments do not include a provision for income tax because earnings from foreign operations are considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. For the year ended April 26, 2008, $1.0 million (net of tax of $0.6 million) related to a cash flow hedge is included in comprehensive income. For the year ended April 29, 2006, ($0.9) million (net of tax benefit of $0.5 million) related to a cash flow hedge is included in comprehensive income.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and common share equivalents, when dilutive, during the period.

The following table sets forth the denominator for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. There were no material adjustments to the numerator.

 

   Fiscal Year
   2007  2006  2005
   (in thousands)

Denominator:

  

Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares

  136,815  137,690  136,839

Effect of dilutive securities:

      

Stock options

  773  1,296  1,744

Restricted stock

  16  —    —  

Employee stock purchase plan

  38  43  44

Capital accumulation plan

  127  172  187

Convertible debentures

  —    33  59
         

Dilutive potential common shares

  954  1,544  2,034
         

Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares

  137,769  139,234  138,873
         
  Fiscal Year
  2008 2007 2006(1)
  (in thousands)

Denominator:

 

Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares

 132,078 136,815 137,690

Effect of dilutive securities—stock options, restricted stock, and stock purchase plans

 832 954 1,544
      

Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares

 132,910 137,769 139,234
      

(1)Dilutive securities included 33 related to convertible debentures. The debentures were converted in fiscal 2006.

Options to purchase 568, 764, 257, and 0257 shares of common stock during fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Unvested restricted stock awards outstanding which were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share during fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006 were 1, 76, and 78, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. No restricted stock awards were issued by the Company prior to fiscal 2006.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006,March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards BoardFASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,an amendment of SFAS No. 133 (“FASB”) issuedSFAS No. FAS Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”161”). FIN 48 clarifies the accountingSFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial standards for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in thederivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements in accordance with FASissued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or161 is expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidanceat the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have on future changes,our consolidated financial statements.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

classification, interestIn December 2007, FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and penalties, accountingdevelopment and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS 141(R), changes in interim periods, disclosuresan acquired entity’s deferred tax assets and transition. FIN 48uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have completed2008 and will change our initial evaluationaccounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis.

In February 2007, FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective at the beginning of our fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 and determined that such adoption is not expected toSFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results from operations.statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASStatement No. 157, “FairFair Value Measurements.MeasurementsFAS(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASSFAS No. 157 applies under other previously issued accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. FASSFAS No. 157, isas originally issued, was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-b, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and interim periods within thoseliabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to financial assets and liabilities is effective at the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal years. We are currently2009. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of FASSFAS No. 157 will have on our financial statements and related disclosures, but does not expect SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position or results of operations.

2. Cash Equivalents

At April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007, cash and April 29, 2006, cash equivalents consisted of the following:

 

  April 28,
2007
  April 29,
2006
  April 26,
2008
  April 28,
2007

Cash on hand

  $144,611  $104,887  $178,745  $144,611

Cash equivalents:

        

Government securities

   82,170   112,050   115,531   82,170

Money market funds

   15,010   7,455   13,888   15,010
            
   97,180   119,505   129,419   97,180
            

Total

  $241,791  $224,392  $308,164  $241,791
            

Cash on hand is generally in interest earning accounts. Short-term investments have original maturities of one year or less.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for each of the Company’s reportable segments for the fiscal year ended April 28, 200726, 2008 are as follows:

 

  Balance at
April 29, 2006
  

Acquisition

Activity

  

Other

Activity

 

Balance at

April 28, 2007

  Balance at
April 28, 2007
  Acquisition
Activity
  Other
Activity
  Balance at
April 26, 2008

Dental supply

  $90,063  2,457  9  $92,529  $92,529  $6,549  $502  $99,580

Rehabilitation supply

   482,535  6,362  (9,062)  479,835   479,835   10,779   —     490,614

Veterinary supply

   83,608  4,601    88,209   88,209   2,949   —     91,158
                        

Total

  $656,206  13,420  (9,053) $660,573  $660,573  $20,277  $502  $681,352
                        

The acquisition activity column primarily represents the finalization of the purchase price allocation of a fiscal year 2006 acquisition, the preliminary purchase price allocation of fiscal year 2007 acquisitions and a contingent earn-out payment related to an acquisition made in a prior year. The reduction in goodwill within the rehabilitation supply segment’s other activity column relates to the settlement of an income tax matter that resulted from the AbilityOne acquisition in September 2003. The settlement was finalized in the current fiscal year for an amount lower than the estimated liability that was included in purchase accounting. Accordingly, the liability and related goodwill were reduced.2008 acquisitions. Preliminary purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment for changes in the preliminary assumptions pending additional information, including final asset valuations.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Balances of acquiredother intangible assets excluding goodwill are as follows:

 

  

April 28,

2007

 

April 29,

2006

   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 

Unamortized—indefinite lived:

      

Copyrights, trade names and trademarks

  $76,402  $76,402   $76,402  $76,402 

Amortized:

      

Customer lists and other amortizable intangible assets

   59,638   60,629 

Distribution agreement, customer lists and other

   165,182   159,638 

Less: Accumulated amortization

   (33,683)  (29,023)   (41,186)  (33,683)
              

Net amortized

   25,955   31,606 

Net amortized other intangible assets

   123,996   125,955 
              

Total identifiable intangible assets, net

  $102,357  $108,008   $200,398  $202,357 
              

FutureIn the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company extended its exclusive North American distribution agreement with Sirona Dental Systems GmbH (“Sirona”) for Sirona’s CEREC 3D dental restorative system. The Company paid a $100 million distribution fee to extend the agreement for a 10-year period that began in October 2007. The distribution fee is included in identifiable intangibles, net in the consolidated balance sheet. The amortization of the distribution agreement fee will occur over the 10-year period and will reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the fee are realized, consisting primarily of revenues generated from the sale of CEREC 3D dental restorative systems. Amortization expense in any year may differ significantly from other years.

With respect to the amortized other intangible assets, future amortization expense is expected to approximate $4,800, $4,400, $3,200, $2,200,$8,700, $8,300, $7,700, $8,100, and $2,100$8,100 for fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2012,2013, respectively. The preceding expected amortization expense is an estimate. Actual amounts of amortization expense may differ from estimated amounts due to additional intangible asset acquisitions, finalization of preliminary valuations, actual revenues generated from the sale of CEREC 3D dental restorative systems, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, impairment of intangible assets, accelerated amortization of intangible assets and other events.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

4. Acquisitions

The Company made the following acquisitions during the periods covered by these financial statements:

 

Entity

  

Closing dateSegment

Fiscal 2008:

Leventhal & Sons, Inc.

  

Consideration

Dental supply

Associated Medical Supply, Inc.

Veterinary supply

Quality Health Products, Inc.

Rehabilitation supply

Kees-Goebel Medical Specialties, Inc.

Rehabilitation supply

Advanced Practice Systems, LLC

Rehabilitation supply

Goldsmith Medical Company

Rehabilitation supply

New England X-Ray, Inc.

Veterinary supply

Seneca Medical, Inc.

Rehabilitation supply

W.S. Medical LLC

Rehabilitation supply

Cripps Corp.

Rehabilitation supply

Fiscal 2007:

Theraquip, Inc.

  

December 20, 2006

Cash & Earn-out

Rehabilitation supply

Metro Medical, Inc.

  

December 7, 2006

Cash & Earn-out

Rehabilitation supply

Dale Surgical Professional Supply, Inc.

  Rehabilitation supply

June 19, 2006Fiscal 2006:

Intra Corp.

  

Cash & Earn-out

Veterinary supply

Intra Corp.

Accu-Bite, Inc.

Milburn Distributions, Inc.

  

December 16, 2005

September 6, 2005

October 12, 2004

Cash & Earn-out

Cash & Earn-out

Cash

Blue Ribbon Dental

September 17, 2004

Cash

CAESY Education Systems, Inc.

May 12, 2004

Cash & Earn-out

Medco Supply Company, Inc.

May 3, 2004

Cash

supply

The above acquisitions have been recorded using the purchase method of accounting. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisitions was allocated as follows:

   Fiscal Year 
   2007  2006  2005 

Purchase price

  $6,972  $33,576  $72,855 

Allocated to the following:

    

Accounts receivable

   1,396   11,283   8,546 

Inventory

   1,681   11,767   10,163 

Fixed assets

   208   2,949   2,532 

Identifiable intangibles

   —     525   25,228 

Other assets

   17   630   891 

Accounts payable

   (1,065)  (8,441)  (5,586)

Accrued expenses

   (1,627)  (6,988)  (1,697)

Long-term debt

   —     (15)  —   
             

Goodwill

  $6,362  $21,866  $32,778 
             

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The operating results of each of these acquisitions are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income from the date of each acquisition. Pro forma results of operations and details of the purchase price allocations have not been presented for these acquisitions since the effects of these business acquisitions were not material to the Company either individually or in the aggregate.

5. Property and Equipment

 

  April 28,
2007
 April 29,
2006
   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 

Land

  $10,990  $9,050   $13,100  $10,990 

Buildings

   71,129   72,772    76,763   71,129 

Leasehold improvements

   9,978   7,812    12,087   9,978 

Furniture and equipment

   73,433   64,478    77,757   73,433 

Data processing equipment

   55,597   49,943    61,946   55,597 

Construction-in-progress

   3,919   15,958    17,708   3,919 
              
   225,046   220,013    259,361   225,046 

Accumulated depreciation

   (93,094)  (78,472)   (110,429)  (93,094)
              
  $131,952  $141,541   $148,932  $131,952 
              

Construction-in-progress as of April 26, 2008 was comprised mostly of separatea project to expand an existing distribution warehousefacility in California and the expansion of the Company’s corporate headquarters. The Company is contractually committed to approximately $15 million of additional expenditures related to these two projects, as of April 29, 2006.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

which are expected to be completed in fiscal 2009. There were no individually significant items in the construction-in-progress balance as of April 28, 2007.

6. Customer Financing

As a convenience to its customers, the Company offers several different financing alternatives including both a Company sponsored program and a third party program. For the third party program, the Company acts as a facilitator between the customer and the third party financing entity with no on-going involvement in the financing transaction. Under the Company sponsored program, equipment purchases for top quality creditsby customers with strong credit are financed to a maximum of $0.4 million for any one customer. The Company generally sells the customers’ installment salefinancing contracts to outside financial institutions in the normal course of its business. The Company currently has two arrangements under which it sells these contracts.

In fiscal 2003, the Company initiated an agreement to sell its equipment finance contracts to a commercial paper conduit managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. To participate in the commercial paper conduit, the Company was required to establish a special purpose entity (“SPE”), PDC Funding Company, LLC, a consolidated, wholly owned subsidiary. The Company transfers installment salefinancing contracts to the SPE and in turn, the SPE sells the contracts to the commercial paper conduit administered by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.conduit. The SPE does not issue any debt. While there is no recourse to the Company by the commercial paper conduit on the sale of contracts, the Company receives only 90% of the principal amount of the contracts upon the sale. The remaining 10% of the proceeds is held by the conduit as security against the eventual performance of the portfolio. The holdback receivable from the conduit is recorded as a non-current asset, which is carried at its estimated fair market value. The capacity of this arrangement with the conduit is a maximum of $440 million.

The Company also maintains an agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as agent, whereby the U.S. Bank group purchases customers’ installment salefinancing contracts. During fiscal 2007, the agreement with U.S. Bank was restructured. The Company has established a newanother SPE, PDC Funding LLC II, LLC (“PDC II”), as a consolidated, wholly owned subsidiary, which sells the installmentfinancing contracts to the U.S. Bank group. The

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Company receives 94% of the principal amounts of the contracts upon sale with the remaining 6% of the proceeds held by the bankbanks as security against the eventual performance of the portfolio. The holdback receivable from the banks is recorded as a non-current asset, which is carried at its estimated fair market value. The capacity under the agreement is $110 million. Under the previous structure, the Company received 100% of the principal of the contracts and provided a 25% contingent guarantee of collection.

These financing arrangements are accounted for as a sale of assets under the provisions of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” During fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, the Company sold approximately $229.7, $247.0, $277.6, and $279.5$277.6 million, respectively, of its contracts under these arrangements. The Company retains servicing responsibilities under both agreements, for which it is paid a servicing fee. The servicing fees received by the Company are considered adequate compensation for services rendered. Accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. The agreements require the Company to maintain a minimum current ratio and maximum leverage ratio and minimum net worth.ratio. The Company was in compliance with the covenants at April 28, 2007.26, 2008.

A total of $436.4$425.5 million of installmentfinancing contracts receivable sold under the agreements were outstanding at April 28, 2007.26, 2008. The residual receivable under the JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. arrangementarrangements was approximately $37.9$47.7 and $38.3 million at April 28, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. The residual receivable under the April 2007 U.S. Bank agreement was approximately $8.546.4 million as of April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007.2007, respectively. Since the internal financing program beganprogram’s inception in 1994, bad debt write-offs have amounted to less than one-percent of the loans originated.

7. Long-Term Debt

During fiscal 2007, $30 million of variable rate term loan principal was paid off early. Long-term debt was composed of the following at year-end:

   April 28,
2007
  April 29,
2006
 

Variable rate (Libor plus 1.00%) term loan due fiscal 2009

  $—    $50,000 

Fixed rate (3.14 % to 4.14%) senior notes due fiscal 2007 to 2009

   80,000   150,000 

Variable rate (Libor plus 0.75%) senior notes due fiscal 2009

   100,000   100,000 

Other debt

   24   41 
         
  $180,024  $300,041 

Less current maturities

   (50,014)  (90,027)
         

Long-term debt

  $130,010  $210,014 
         

Maturities of long-term debt by fiscal year are as follows:

2008

  $50,014

2009

   130,010
    

Total long-term debt

  $180,024
    

The debt agreements contain various financial covenants including certain leverage and interest coverage ratios in addition to a minimum net worth covenant as defined in the Company’s debt agreements. The Company met the financial covenants under the debt agreements as of April 28, 2007.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

7. Long-Term Debt

In March 2008, the Company issued fixed-rate senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $450 million, consisting of (i) $50 million of 4.63% senior notes, due fiscal 2013; (ii) $250 million of 5.17% senior notes, due fiscal 2015; and (iii) $150 million of 5.75% senior notes, due fiscal 2018.

Also in March 2008, the Company entered into a term loan agreement with a principal amount of $75 million, which matures in fiscal 2013. The term loan bears interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus a spread which can range from 0.50% to 1.25% based on our leverage ratio, as defined in the agreement.

The proceeds from the issuance of debt in March 2008 were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock and to repay borrowings under the Company’s revolving line of credit. The remaining proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes. Debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of debt in March 2008 of $1.8 million are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt.

In addition, in March 2008 the Company entered into two forward starting interest rate swap agreements, each with notional amounts of $100 million and accounted for as cash flow hedges, to hedge interest rate fluctuations in anticipation of the issuance of the 5.17% senior notes due fiscal 2015 and the 5.75% senior notes due fiscal 2018, respectively. Upon issuance of the hedged debt, the Company settled it’s forward starting interest rate swap agreements and recorded a $1.0 million gain, net of income taxes, to accumulated other comprehensive income, which will be amortized against interest expense over the life of the related debt.

The Company has $300 million available under a revolving credit facility through November 2012. Interest on borrowings is based on LIBOR plus a spread which can range from 0.40% to 1.00%. This spread as well as a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility are based on our leverage ratio, as defined in the agreement. There were no outstanding borrowings under the facility at April 26, 2008 or April 28, 2007.

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

   April 26, 2008  April 28, 2007 

Fixed rate (3.65% to 4.14%) senior notes due fiscal 2009

  $30,000  $80,000 

Variable rate (Libor plus 0.75%) senior notes due fiscal 2009

   100,000   100,000 

Fixed rate (4.63 % to 5.75%) senior notes due fiscal 2013 to 2018

   450,000   —   

Variable rate (Libor plus 1.00%) term note due fiscal 2013

   75,000   —   

Other debt

   34   24 
         
  $655,034  $180,024 

Less current maturities

   (130,010)  (50,014)
         

Long-term debt

  $525,024  $130,010 
         

Maturities of long-term debt by fiscal year are as follows:

2009

  $130,010

2010

   24

2011

   —  

2012

   —  

2013

   125,000

Thereafter

   400,000
    

Total long-term debt

  $655,034
    

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The debt agreements contain various financial covenants including certain leverage and interest coverage ratios as defined in the agreements. The Company met the financial covenants under the debt agreements as of April 26, 2008.

8. Derivative Financial Instruments

In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, theThe Company entered intois a party to certain offsetting and identical interest rate cap agreements. These cap agreements are not designated for hedge accounting treatment and were entered into to fulfill certain covenants of a sale agreement between a commercial paper conduit managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and PDC Funding. The cap agreements provide a credit enhancement feature for the installmentfinancing contracts sold by PDC Funding to the commercial paper conduit, and replace a minimum interest rate margin previously required under the sale agreement.

The cap agreements are cancelled and new agreements entered into periodically to maintain consistency with the dollar maximum of the sale agreements and the maturity of the underlying financing contracts. PDC Funding has purchased two interest rate caps from banks with combined amortizing notional amounts of $400$440 million. At the same time, Patterson Companies, Inc. has sold two identical interest rate caps to the same banks. InAt April 26, 2008, the fourth quarteroutstanding caps have a maturity date of fiscal 2006, these caps were amended to adjust the notional amounts to a combined amortizing total of $440 million.March 2014. The estimated unrealized gainfair value of the two purchased interest rate caps were $0.3 millionoutstanding at April 26, 2008 and $1.0 million as of April 28, 2007 were $0.8 and April 29, 2006,$0.3 million, respectively. TheseAt each date, these amounts were completely offset by the estimated unrealized lossfair value of the two sold interest rate caps of $0.3 million($0.8) and $1.0($0.3) million, respectively. Accordingly, the impact to consolidated earnings of the Company is zero.

Similar to the above agreements, PDC Funding II and Patterson Companies, Inc. entered into offsetting and identical interest rate swap agreements in fiscal 2008. These agreements have an amortizing notional of $110 million and a fair value of $1.6 million and ($1.6) million, respectively, as of April 26, 2008. The impact to consolidated earnings of the Company is zero.

In fiscal 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a bank under which the Company payspaid a fixed rate and receivesreceived a floating rate based on an amortizing notional amount. This agreement doesdid not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and, accordingly, the Company recordsrecorded the fair value (estimated unrealized gain or loss) of the agreement as an asset or liability and the change in any period as income or expense of the period in which the change occurs.occurred. This agreement matured in fiscal 2008. As of April 28, 2007, thisthe agreement had a notional amount of approximately $14 million and an estimated unrealized gain of less than $0.1 million. As of April 29, 2006, the agreement had a notional amount of approximately $39 million and an estimated unrealized gain of less than $0.1 million. In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company entered into a similar interest rate swap agreement that asmatures in November 2011. As of April 26, 2008, that agreement had a notional amount of approximately $42 million and an estimated unrealized loss of $1.6 million. As of April 28, 2007, the agreement had a notional amount of approximately $52 million and an estimated unrealized loss of ($0.7)$0.7 million.

The total net unrealized loss recognized in the statementstatements of income under theserelated to the non-offsetting interest rate swaps duringswap agreements was $1.1 and $0.7 million in fiscal 2008 and 2007, was approximately $0.7 million.respectively. The impact to the statement of income duringin fiscal year 2006 was nominal. See also Note 7 for detail on two forward starting interest rate swaps which were entered into and settled during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and Note 12 for detail on an accelerated share repurchase agreement entered into in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and settled on June 18, 2008.

The Company does not use financial instruments or derivatives for any trading or other speculative purposes.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9. Leases and Non-cancelable Purchase Commitments

The Company leases facilities for its branch office locations, a number of distribution facilities, and also certain equipment. These leases are accounted for as operating leases. Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows at April 28, 2007:26, 2008:

 

2008

  $12,633

2009

   11,819  $13,668

2010

   10,577   12,866

2011

   7,183   8,942

2012

   4,876   6,417

2013

   4,586

Thereafter

   4,991   2,636
      

Total minimum payments required

  $52,079  $49,115
      

Rent expense was $17,088, $15,552 $15,171 and $13,867$15,171 for the years ended April 26, 2008, April 28, 2007 and April 29, 2006, and April 30, 2005, respectively.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10. Income Taxes

Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

  Fiscal Year   Fiscal Year 
  2007 2006 2005   2008  2007 2006 

Current:

         

Federal

  $96,677  $90,752  $86,470   $93,814  $96,677  $90,752 

Foreign

   12,536   13,609   10,451    15,184   12,536   13,609 

State

   11,935   10,327   11,988    10,426   11,935   10,327 
                    

Total current

   121,148   114,688   108,909    119,424   121,148   114,688 

Deferred:

         

Federal

   178   3,887   1,737    11,894   178   3,887 

Foreign

   (70)  (361)  (1,063)   230   (70)  (361)

State

   16   334   166    1,022   16   334 
                    

Total deferred

   124   3,860   840    13,146   124   3,860 
                    

Provision for income taxes

  $121,272  $118,548  $109,749   $132,570  $121,272  $118,548 
                    

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and in non-current liabilities on the balance sheet. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of April 28, 200726, 2008 and April 29, 200628, 2007 are as follows:

 

  Fiscal Year 
  2007 2006   2008 2007 

Deferred current income tax asset (liability):

      

Capital Accumulation Plan

  $7,149  $7,510   $6,559  $7,149 

Inventory Obsolescence

   1,952   2,414 

Inventory obsolescence

   2,311   1,952 

Health insurance

   3,340   2,415    1,292   3,340 

Bad debt allowance

   1,153   903    914   1,153 

LIFO reserve

   (1,492)  (2,747)   (3,734)  (1,492)

Other

   6,808   4,727    6,691   6,808 
              

Deferred net current income tax asset

   18,910   15,222    14,033   18,910 
       

Deferred long-term income tax (liability) asset:

      

Amortizable intangibles

  $(28,050) $(26,649)  $(30,081) $(28,050)

Goodwill

   (23,440)  (19,082)   (28,350)  (23,440)

Property, plant and equipment

   (4,495)  (4,877)

Property, plant, equipment

   (4,603)  (4,495)

Stock based compensation expense

   1,929   516    3,239   1,929 

Other

   429   556    1,989   429 
              

Deferred net long-term income tax liability

   (53,627)  (49,536)   (57,806)  (53,627)
              

Net deferred income tax liability

  $(34,717) $(34,314)  $(43,773) $(34,717)
              

Income tax expense varies from the amount computed using the U.S. statutory rate. The reasons for this difference and the related tax effects are shown below:

 

  Fiscal Year   Fiscal Year
  2007 2006  2005   2008 2007 2006

Tax at U.S. statutory rate

  $115,363  $110,941  $102,707   $125,100  $115,363  $110,941

State tax provision, net of federal benefit

   5,611   5,341   5,463    6,029   5,611   5,341

Effect of foreign taxes

   1,854   803   (1,379)   1,795   1,854   803

Other

   (1,556)  1,463   2,958    (354)  (1,556)  1,463
                   
  $121,272  $118,548  $109,749   $132,570  $121,272  $118,548
                   

The Company adopted FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 effective April 29, 2007, the first day of fiscal 2008, with no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. These standards clarify the separate identification and reporting of estimated amounts that could be assessed upon audit. The potential assessments are considered unrecognized tax benefits, because, if it is ultimately determined they are unnecessary, the reversal of these previously recorded amounts will result in a beneficial impact to the Company’s financial statements.

As of April 26, 2008 and April 29, 2007, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits were $19.6 million and $17.6 million, respectively. If determined to be unnecessary, these amounts (net of deferred tax assets of $5.7 million and $5.0 million, respectively, related to the tax deductibility of the gross liabilities) would decrease our effective tax rate. The gross unrecognized tax benefits are included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

A summary of the changes in the gross amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended April 26, 2008 is shown below:

Balance at April 29, 2007

  $17,587 

Additions for tax positions related to the current year

   3,601 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

   (648)

Statute expirations

   (992)
     

Balance at April 26, 2008

  $19,548 
     

The Company also recognizes both interest and penalties with respect to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of April 26, 2008 and April 29, 2007, the Company had recorded $3.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for interest and penalties. These amounts are also included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. These amounts, net of related deferred tax assets, if determined to be unnecessary, would decrease the Company’s effective tax rate. During the year ended April 26, 2008, the Company recorded as part of tax expense $1.0 million related to an increase in its estimated liability for interest and penalties.

The Company files income tax returns, including returns for our subsidiaries, with federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The IRS has either examined or waived examination of all periods up to and including our fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. Periodically, state, local and foreign income tax returns are examined by various taxing authorities. The Company does not believe the outcome of these various examinations would have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.

11. Segment and Geographic Data

Patterson Companies, Inc. is comprised of three reportable segments: dental, veterinary, and rehabilitation supply. The Company’s reportable business segments are strategic business units that offer similar products and services to different customer bases. The dental supply segment provides a virtually complete range of consumable dental products, clinical and laboratory equipment and value-added services to dentists, dental laboratories, institutions and other dental healthcare providers throughout North America. The veterinary supply segment provides consumable supplies, equipment, diagnostic products, biologicals (vaccines) and pharmaceuticals to companion-pet veterinary clinics in the majority of regions throughout the United States. The rehabilitation supply segment provides a comprehensive range of distributed and self-manufactured rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products to acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, rehabilitation clinics, dealers and schools.

The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating income. The corporate office general and administrative expenses are included in the dental supply segment and consist of home office support costs in areas such as informational technology, marketing, purchasing, finance, human resources and facilities.

The cost to operate the distribution centers are allocated to the operating income amounts inunits based on the table below for fiscal year 2007 includethrough-put of the following stock-based compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R) for each segment: dental supply: $6,025; rehabilitation supply: $973; veterinary supply: $759. There was no corresponding expense recorded in fiscal years 2006 and 2005, since SFAS No. 123(R) was adopted at the beginning of fiscal 2007 using the modified prospective method as discussed in Note 1.unit.

The following table presents information about the Company’s reportable segments:

   Fiscal Year
   2007  2006  2005

Net sales

      

Dental supply

  $2,064,630  $1,966,954  $1,834,203

Rehabilitation supply

   334,342   302,021   295,299

Veterinary supply

   399,426   346,148   291,955
            

Consolidated net sales

  $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457
            

Operating income

      

Dental supply

  $262,359  $249,820  $235,428

Rehabilitation supply

   51,185   54,786   51,758

Veterinary supply

   22,146   18,406   14,950
            

Consolidated operating income

  $335,690  $323,012  $302,136
            

Depreciation and amortization

      

Dental supply

  $16,748  $14,435  $12,227

Rehabilitation supply

   5,871   6,299   11,630

Veterinary supply

   2,882   2,942   3,005
            

Consolidated depreciation and amortization

  $25,501  $23,676  $26,862
            

Capital expenditures

      

Dental supply

  $16,560  $36,245  $28,821

Rehabilitation supply

   1,961   12,374   1,546

Veterinary supply

   986   534   1,166
            

Consolidated capital expenditures

  $19,507  $49,153  $31,533
            

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

   Fiscal Year
   2007  2006  2005

Total assets

      

Dental supply

  $1,023,248  $1,019,863  $805,006

Rehabilitation supply

   712,009   696,928   701,104

Veterinary supply

   205,063   194,927   179,191
            

Consolidated total assets

  $1,940,320  $1,911,718  $1,685,301
            

The following table presents information about the Company’s reportable segments:

   Fiscal Year
   2008  2007  2006

Net sales

      

Dental supply

  $2,181,286  $2,064,630  $1,966,954

Rehabilitation supply

   371,016   334,342   302,021

Veterinary supply

   446,427   399,426   346,148
            

Consolidated net sales

  $2,998,729  $2,798,398  $2,615,123
            

Operating income

      

Dental supply

  $281,877  $262,359  $249,820

Rehabilitation supply

   52,642   51,185   54,786

Veterinary supply

   24,684   22,146   18,406
            

Consolidated operating income

  $359,203  $335,690  $323,012
            

Depreciation and amortization

      

Dental supply

  $17,427  $16,748  $14,435

Rehabilitation supply

   5,903   5,871   6,299

Veterinary supply

   2,950   2,882   2,942
            

Consolidated depreciation and amortization

  $26,280  $25,501  $23,676
            

Capital expenditures

      

Dental supply

  $33,926  $16,560  $36,245

Rehabilitation supply

   1,812   1,961   12,374

Veterinary supply

   253   986   534
            

Consolidated capital expenditures

  $35,991  $19,507  $49,153
            

Total assets

      

Dental supply

  $1,100,471  $1,023,248  $1,019,863

Rehabilitation supply

   743,786   712,009   696,928

Veterinary supply

   232,116   205,063   194,927
            

Consolidated total assets

  $2,076,373  $1,940,320  $1,911,718
            

The following table presents sales information by product for the Company:

 

  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year
  2007  2006  2005  2008  2007  2006

Net sales

            

Consumable and printed products

  $1,757,472  $1,633,544  $1,489,708  $1,887,703  $1,757,472  $1,633,544

Equipment and software

   821,091   789,263   753,914   866,969   821,091   789,263

Other

   219,835   192,316   177,835   244,057   219,835   192,316
                  

Total

  $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457  $2,998,729  $2,798,398  $2,615,123
                  

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents information about the Company by geographic area. No individual country, except for the United States, generated sales greater than 10% of consolidated net sales. There were no material sales between geographic areas.

 

  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year
  2007  2006  2005  2008  2007  2006

Net sales

            

United States

  $2,540,899  $2,391,249  $2,211,861  $2,707,971  $2,540,899  $2,391,249

International

   257,499   223,874   209,596   290,758   257,499   223,874
                  

Total

  $2,798,398  $2,615,123  $2,421,457  $2,998,729  $2,798,398  $2,615,123
                  

Income before tax

            

United States

  $296,564  $284,767  $263,134  $318,304  $296,564  $284,767

International

   33,044   32,206   30,313   39,124   33,044   32,206
                  

Total

  $329,608  $316,973  $293,447  $357,428  $329,608  $316,973
                  

Long-lived assets

            

United States

  $970,390  $981,381  $839,298  $1,005,235  $970,390  $981,381

International

   83,440   82,963   53,276   86,097   83,440   82,963
                  

Total

  $1,053,830  $1,064,344  $892,574  $1,091,332  $1,053,830  $1,064,344
                  

12. Stockholders’ Equity

Share Repurchases

In September 1999,During fiscal 2008, the BoardCompany repurchased 11.7 million shares of Directors authorizedits common stock on the open market at a total cost of $386.1 million. On March 19, 2008, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a financial institution counterparty. Under the terms of up to fourthe ASR, the Company paid $250 million and took delivery of 90% of the shares, or 6.3 million shares, based on an initial share price of $35.60. The final number of shares to be delivered by the counterparty under the ASR was dependent on prevailing market conditions and based on the difference between the initial purchase price per share and a volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock, overminus a five-yearset discount, during a period ending in September 2004. In September 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to six millionmonths. Under terms of the ASR, the Company could have received additional shares of the Company’s common stock overfrom the period ending September 30, 2009. Thecounterparty or could have been required to deliver shares or cash to the counterparty. On June 18, 2008, the transaction was settled and an additional 1,052,037 shares were delivered to the Company, did not repurchase anybringing the total number of its common stock during fiscal 2007, 2006 or 2005.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

shares delivered under the ASR to 7,372,260 at an average price of $33.91.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

During 1990, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a leveraged ESOP. During fiscal 1991, under the provisions of the plan and related financing arrangements, the Company loaned the ESOP $22,000 (the “1990 note”) for the purpose of acquiring its then outstanding preferred stock which was subsequently converted to common stock. At April 28, 200726, 2008 and April 29, 2006,28, 2007, indebtedness of the ESOP to the Company is shown as a deduction from stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The cost of the ESOP is borne by the Company through annual contributions to the plan in amounts determined by the Board of Directors. Shares of stock acquired by the plan are allocated to each participant who has completed 1,000 hours of service during the plan year.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s ESOP and an ESOP sponsored by the Thompson Dental Company (“Thompson”) were used to facilitate the acquisition and merger of Thompson into the Company. The net result of this transaction was an additional loan of $12,612 being made to the ESOP and the ESOP acquiring 665,978 shares of common stock of the Company. Under current accounting standards, these shares are not considered outstanding for the computation of earnings per share until the shares are allocated to the participants. When the shares are allocated to the participants, the expense to the Company will be determined based on the fair market value of the shares in the year of the allocation. The loan bears interest at current rates but principal does not begin to amortize until 2011. AOf the total of 665,978 shares were issued in the transaction, of which 97,810 were previously allocated to Thompson employees. The remaining 568,168 shares began to be allocated in fiscal 2004 but only to the extent of interest on the loan. The non-cash expense from the allocation of shares related to the interest on the loan is not expected to materially impact the consolidated results of operations of the Company.

During fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, shares secured by the 1990 note with a cost of $1,200, $1,202, $1,101, and $775,$1,101, respectively, were earned and allocated to ESOP participants. These amounts represented the Company’s contribution for each fiscal year.

At April 28, 2007,26, 2008, a total of 10,667,09011,146,163 shares of the common stock wereheld by the ESOP had been allocated to participants and had a fair market value of $387,002.$373,508. With respect to the 1990 note, shares allocated were 11,606,390,12,889,240, committed-to-be-released shares were 1,262,6381,262,530 and suspense shares were 6,262,618.4,979,876. Related to the shares from the Thompson transaction, shares allocated were 131,197,147,286, committed-to-be-released shares were 16,08916,738 and suspense shares were 518,692.501,954.

On September 11, 2006, the Company entered into a third loan agreement with the ESOP and loaned $105 million (the “2006 note”) for the sole purpose of enabling the ESOP to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Securities”) in the open market and pay any corresponding broker commissions.

The 2006 note is payable in full on September 10, 2026. Interest on the unpaid principal balance accrues at a rate equal to six-month LIBOR, with the rate resetting semi-annually. Interest payments are not required during the period from and including September 11, 2006 through April 30, 2010. On April 30, 2010, any accrued and unpaid interest will be added to the outstanding principal balance under the note, with interest thereafter accruing on the increased principal amount. Unpaid interest accruing after April 30, 2010 is due and payable on April 30, 2011 and each successive April 30 occurring through September 10, 2026.

As of April 28, 2007, theThe ESOP had purchased approximately 3.2 million3,159,645 shares with the proceeds from the 2006 note. This loan and related shares, as well as the Thompson shares, are being accounted for under SOP 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Stock Ownership Plans” and accordingly, unallocated shares held by the Trust are not considered outstanding in the computation of earnings per share. When the shares are allocated to the participants, the expense to the Company will be determined based on the market value of the shares in the year of allocation. The Company anticipates the allocation of thesethe shares related to the 2006 note will begin in fiscal 2012 and last over a period of approximately 10 to 15 years.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

13. Share-based Compensation

Effective April 30, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25 and requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company utilized the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25. In addition, the Company followed the pro forma disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, as amended by Statement No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (“SFAS 148”)” (SFAS No. 148).

As permitted by SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has adopted the requirements of the standard using the modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based awards granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. With respect to (b) above, the related compensation cost is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123 and SFAS 148. Share-based compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. In accordance with the modified prospective method of adoption, the financial statement amounts for periods prior to April 30, 2006 have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of recognizing compensation cost.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to share-based employee compensation for the yearsyear ended April 29, 2006 and April 30, 2005:2006:

 

  April 29,
2006
 April 30,
2005
   April 29,
2006
 

Net income, as reported

  $198,425  $183,698,   $198,425 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

   600   —      600 

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   (5,326)  (3,424)   (5,326)
           

Pro forma net earnings

  $193,699  $180,274   $193,699 
           

Earnings per share—basic:

     

As reported

  $1.44  $1.34   $1.44 

Pro forma

  $1.41  $1.32   $1.41 

Earnings per share—diluted:

     

As reported

  $1.43  $1.32   $1.43 

Pro forma

  $1.39  $1.30   $1.39 

The consolidated statements of income for the yearyears ended April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007 include pre-tax share-based compensation expense of $7.7 million ($6.1 after-tax) and $7.8 million ($6.3 after-tax), respectively, all of which is included in operating expenses within the consolidated statements of income. This expense reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.05 for the year ended

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

April 28, 2007. The consolidated statement of cash flows for the yearyears ended April 26, 2008 and April 28, 2007 presents the pre-tax share-based compensation expense as an adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities. In addition, prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense were presented as part of operating cash flows in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that such excess tax benefits be presented as a cash inflow from financing activities and the Company has classified these cash flows, totaling $0.8 and $0.7 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively, in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) for the year ended April 28, 2007. Prior year amounts have not been reclassified..

As of April 28, 200726, 2008, the total compensation cost, before income taxes, related to non-vested awards yet to be recognized was $12.5$15.0 million, and it is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 5.44.7 years.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Description of General Methods and Assumptions Used to Estimate Fair Value

Described below are certain methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of share-based compensation awards. Further information is presented below within this Note 3 that may be unique to a particular award or group of awards.

Expected dividend yield—yield – the Company has not and does not expect to pay dividends. Accordingly, the expected dividend yield used is 0%.

Expected stock price volatility—volatility – the Company considers historical volatility trends, implied future volatility based on certain traded options of the Company, and other factors.

Risk-free interest rate—rate – the Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date with similar terms to the expected term of the award.

Expected term of stock options and restricted stock—the Company uses the “simplified” method for “plain vanilla” options as described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. For all other options, thestock – The Company estimates the expected term, or life, of awards based on several factors, including grantee types, vesting schedules, contractual terms and various factors surrounding exercise behavior of different groups.

Director and Employee Stock Option Plans

In June 1992, the Company adopted a Director Stock Option Plan. Options were granted at the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, vest over one year, and are exercisable for a period of four years commencing one year after the date of grant. This plan terminated during fiscal 2002.

In September 2001, the Company adopted a new Director Stock Option Plan. A total of 800,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under this plan. Options are granted at fair market value of the underlying stock on the option grant date, vest over one year, and are exercisable for a period of nine years commencing one year after the grant date. In addition, each eligible director will have the right to elect to receive additional options in lieu of the amount of the director’s annual fee for service on the board of directors.

In June 1992, the Company adopted the Patterson Dental Company 1992 Stock Option Plan, a plan for employees. Due to the expiration of this plan in fiscal 2003, no options remain available for future issuance under this plan. In September 2002, the Company adopted a new employee equity award plan. A total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the plan. In September 2004, the Company’s shareholders voted to approve the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan, a restatement of the 2002 plan. Upon approval, the Plan was renamed the “Patterson Companies, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan” (“Equity Incentive Plan”).

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Equity Incentive Plan amendments did not change the number of shares reserved for awards under the plan. The Equity Incentive Plan authorizes various award types to be issued under the plan, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock bonuses, cash bonuses, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and dividend equivalents. Awards may have a term no longer than ten years and vesting terms are determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors. The minimum restriction period for restricted stock and restricted stock units is three years, or one year in the case of performance-based awards. Additionally, the maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to awards of restricted stock, restricted stock awards and stock bonuses is 2,000,000 shares. Prior to fiscal 2006, only stock option awards had been granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The fair value of stock options granted was estimated as of the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions during fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005:2006:

 

  April 28,
2007
 April 29,
2006
 April 30,
2005
   April 26,
2008
 April 28,
2007
 April 29,
2006
 
   (pro forma) (pro forma)    (pro forma) 

Expected dividend yield

  —    —    —     —    —    —   

Expected stock price volatility

  28.0% 30.0% 31.4%  28.0% 28.0% 30.0%

Risk-free interest rate

  4.9% 4.1% 3.4%  4.6% 4.9% 4.1%

Expected life of options (years)

  7.1  6.0  6.7   8.0  7.1  6.0 

Following is a summary of stock option activity for all plans during fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005:2006:

 

   Total Outstanding
   Number
of
Options
  Exercise
Price (a)
  Intrinsic
Value

Balance as of April 24, 2004

  3,367  $17.10  

Granted

  516   36.24  

Exercised

  (365)  12.44  

Canceled

  (380)  18.60  
         

Balance as of April 30, 2005

  3,138   20.61  

Granted

  74   44.01  

Exercised

  (267)  12.81  

Canceled

  (39)  15.93  
         

Balance as of April 29, 2006

  2,906  $21.99  

Granted

  77   32.98  

Exercised

  (273)  16.03  

Canceled

  (159)  23.30  
         

Balance as of April 28, 2007

  2,551  $22.88  $34,183
           

Vested or expected to vest as of April 28, 2007

  1,893   $23.21   $24,742
           

Options exercisable as of April 28, 2007

  675  $21.78  $9,788
           

   Total Outstanding
   Number
of
Options
  Exercise
Price (a)
  Intrinsic
Value

Balance as of April 30, 2005

  3,138  $20.61  

Granted

  74   44.01  

Exercised

  (267)  12.81  

Cancelled

  (39)  15.93  
         

Balance as of April 29, 2006

  2,906   21.99  

Granted

  77   32.98  

Exercised

  (273)  16.03  

Cancelled

  (159)  23.30  
         

Balance as of April 28, 2007

  2,551   22.88  

Granted

  40   36.06  

Exercised

  (216)  15.00  

Cancelled

  (345)  22.16  
         

Balance as of April 26, 2008

  2,030  $24.10  $19,102
           

Vested or expected to vest as of April 26, 2008

  1,446  $24.08  $13,636
           

Exercisable as of April 26, 2008

  648  $24.03  $6,143
           

(a)Weighted-average exercise price

The weighted average fair valuevalues of options granted during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 were $15.88 and $13.44, respectively. Related to stock options exercised during fiscal 2008, total intrinsic value was $13.44.$4.7 million, cash received was $3.2 million and tax benefits realized were $1.2 million. Related to stock options exercised during fiscal 2007, total intrinsic value was $4.7 million, cash received was $4.5 million and tax benefits realized were $1.3 million. The Company settles stock option exercises with newly issued common shares. The weighted average remaining contractual lives of options outstanding and options exercisable as of April 28, 200726, 2008 were 5.34.3 and 4.83.9 years, respectively.

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Restricted Stock and Performance Unit Awards

Beginning in fiscal 2006, the Company issued restricted stock and performance unit awards under the Equity Incentive Plan. The grant date fair value is based on the closing stock price on the day of the grant. Restricted stock awards vest over a seven or nine-year period and are subject to forfeiture provisions. Certain

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

restricted stock awards, which are held by line management, are subject to accelerated vesting provisions beginning three years after the grant date, based on certain operating goals. The performance unit awards, issued primarily to executive management, are earned at the end of a three-year period if certain operating goals are met, and are settled in an equivalent number of common shares or in cash as determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors. The satisfaction of operating goals will not be finally determined until the end of a three-year period. Accordingly, the Company recognizes expense related to performance unit awards over the requisite service period using the straight-line method based on the outcome that is probable. During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, total expense recognized related to restricted stock and performance unit awards was $0.9$1.7 million and $0,$0.9 million, respectively.

Through April 28, 2007,26, 2008, no restricted stock or performance unit awards have vested. The following tables summarize information concerning non-vested restricted stock awards and performance unit awards for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006:

 

  Restricted Stock Awards  Restricted Stock Awards
  Shares Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
  

Shares

 Weighted
Average
Grant-Date

Fair Value

Outstanding at April 30, 2005

  —     —    —     —  

Granted

  94  $50.28  94  $50.28

Forfeitures

  (15)  49.28  (15)  49.28
            

Outstanding at April 29, 2006

  79  $50.47  79   50.47

Granted

  161   32.21  161   32.21

Forfeitures

  (7)  44.90  (7)  44.90
            

Outstanding at April 28, 2007

  233  $38.02  233   38.02

Granted

  181   36.23

Forfeitures

  (21)  37.89
            

Outstanding at April 26, 2008

  393  $37.21
      

 

   Performance Unit Awards
   Shares  Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Outstanding at April 30, 2005

  —     —  

Granted

  13  $52.12

Forfeitures

  —     —  
       

Outstanding at April 29, 2006

  13  $51.12

Granted

  20   32.15

Forfeitures

  (5)  49.35
       

Outstanding at April 28, 2007

  28  $36.98
       

   Performance Unit Awards
    

Shares

  Weighted
Average
Grant-Date

Fair Value

Outstanding at April 30, 2005

  —     —  

Granted

  13  $52.12

Forfeitures

  —     —  
       

Outstanding at April 29, 2006

  13   51.12

Granted

  20   32.15

Forfeitures

  (5)  49.35
       

Outstanding at April 28, 2007

  28   36.98

Granted

  21   36.06

Forfeitures

  (5)  34.96
       

Outstanding at April 26, 2008

  44  $36.77
       

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In June 1992, Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”). A total of 4,750,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan. The Stock Purchase Plan, which is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, is administered by the Board of Directors of the Company or by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors and follows a calendar plan

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

year. Employees are eligible to participate after nine months of employment with the Company if they are employed for at least 20 hours per week and more than five months per year. The Stock Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 10 percent of an employee’s compensation, at 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the offering date or at the end of each three-month period following the offering date during the applicable offering period. Employees may end their participation in the offering at any time during the offering period, and participation ends automatically on termination of employment with the Company. At April 28, 2007,26, 2008, there were 1,873,3811,596,560 shares available for purchase under the Stock Purchase Plan.

Based on the provisions of the Stock Purchase Plan and guidance provided in FASB Technical Bulletin No. 97-1,Accounting Under Statement 123 for Certain Employee Stock Purchase Plans with a Look-back Option (“FTB 97-1”), there are several option elements for which the fair value is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During fiscal 2007, totalTotal expense recognized related to the employee stock purchase plan was $1.9 and $2.1 million.million, during fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions relating to the Stock Purchase Plan for fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005:2006:

 

   (pro forma) 
  2007 (pro forma)
2006
 (pro forma)
2005
   2008 2007 2006 

Expected dividend yield

  —    —    —     —    —    —   

Expected stock price volatility

  28.0% 30.0% 31.2%  28.0% 28.0% 30.0%

Risk-free interest rate

  4.5% 3.2% 3.0%  4.4% 4.5% 3.2%

Expected life of options (years)

  0.5  0.5  0.5   0.5  0.5  0.5 

Capital Accumulation Plan

In 1996, the Company adopted an employee Capital Accumulation Plan (the “CAP Plan”). A total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the CAP Plan. Key employees of the Company or its subsidiaries are eligible to participate by purchasing common stock through payroll deductions, which must be between 5% and 25% of an employee’s compensation, at 75% of the price of the common stock at the beginning of or the end of the calendar year, whichever is lower. The shares issued are restricted stock and are held in the custody of the Company until the restrictions lapse. The restriction period is three years from the beginning of the plan year, but restricted shares are subject to forfeiture provisions. At April 28, 2007, 2,968,44826, 2008, 2,871,885 shares were available for purchase under the CAP Plan.

Based on the provisions of the CAP Plan and guidance provided in FTB No. 97-1, there are option elements for which the fair value is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During fiscal 2007, totalTotal expense recognized related to the employee stock purchase planCap Plan was $1.8 and $1.9 million.million during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions relating to the CAP Plan for fiscal years 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005:2006:

 

   2007  2006  2005 

Expected dividend yield

  —    —    —   

Expected stock price volatility

  28.0% 31.4% 31.4%

Risk-free interest rate

  4.2% 3.2% 3.0%

Expected life of options (years)

  1.0  1.0  1.0 

14. Litigation

Commencing in August 2005, five purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, naming the Company and certain officers and directors and alleging certain

   2008  2007  2006 

Expected dividend yield

  —    —    —   

Expected stock price volatility

  28.0% 28.0% 31.4%

Risk-free interest rate

  3.5% 4.2% 3.2%

Expected life of options (years)

  1.0  1.0  1.0 

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

violations of the federal securities laws. The Court entered an order consolidating the cases into a single action captionedIn Re Patterson Companies, Inc. Securities14. Litigation. On September 16, 2005, a derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota captionedVance Cadd, Derivatively On Behalf of Patterson Companies, Inc. vs. James W. Wiltz, et al. This lawsuit named certain officers and directors of the Company as defendants and alleged breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. On October 11, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota captionedTamara Dolliver, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated vs. Patterson Companies, Inc., et al. This class action lawsuit was brought on behalf of the participants in the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan against the Company and certain officers and directors, and alleged violations of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act. TheCaddandDollivercases were predicated on essentially the same factual allegations alleged in, and are related cases to, the class action lawsuits consolidated asIn Re Patterson Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation.

On May 30, 2006, the Company filed its Motion to Dismiss all three cases. On March 20, 2007, the Court granted the Company’s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice in the Securities and ERISA case, and granted the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice in the Derivative case (theCadd case). A notice of appeal was timely filed only in theCadd case. The Company believes that the allegations madeis involved in theCadd case are without meritvarious product related and it intends to continue to vigorously defend the claim.

Inemployment related legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,business. Some of these proceedings involve product liability claims arising out of the use of products the Company distributes. Product liability indemnification is subjectgenerally obtained from our suppliers. However, in the event a supplier of a defective product is unable to pay a varietyjudgment for which the Company may be jointly liable, the Company would have liability for the entire judgment.

The Company maintains product liability insurance coverage for any potential liability for claims arising out of product-related and employment-related liability claims. The Company’s managementproducts sold by the Company. While the Company believes its insurance coverage is adequate, there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage is sufficient or will be available to us in adequate amounts or at reasonable costs in the future. Also, there can be no assurance that the loss, if any, resulting from theseindemnification agreements with our suppliers will provide us with adequate protection. In addition, future claims will be substantiallybrought against the Company could involve claims not covered by insurance or third-party indemnification agreements, and any uninsured losses from such claims will notcould have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition.

As of April 26, 2008, the Company had accrued our best estimate of potential losses relating to product liability and other claims that were probable to result in a liability and for which it was possible to reasonably estimate a loss .. This accrued amount, as well as related expenses, was not material to our financial position, results of operations or financial position.cash flows. Our method for determining estimated losses considers currently available facts, presently enacted laws and regulations and other external factors, including probable recoveries from third parties.

15. Quarterly Results (unaudited)

Quarterly results are determined in accordance with the accounting policies used for annual data and include certain items based upon estimates for the entire year. All fiscal quarters include results for 13 weeks. The following table summarizes results for fiscal 20072008 and 2006.2007.

 

  Quarter Ended  Quarter Ended
  

Apr. 28,

2007

  

Jan. 27,

2007

  

Oct. 28,

2006

  

July 29,

2006

  Apr. 26,
2008
  Jan. 26,
2008
  Oct. 27,
2007
  July 28,
2007

Net sales

  $739,143  $709,494  $694,273   655,488  $778,388  $776,946  $741,992  $701,403

Gross profit

   260,563   250,266   235,629   222,414   273,154   269,138   252,299   237,134

Operating income

   96,446   92,686   78,021   68,537   101,269   97,114   85,613   75,207

Net income

   59,924   58,591   48,237   41,584   63,209   60,364   53,741   47,544

Earnings per share—basic

  $0.44  $0.43  $0.35  $0.30  $0.52  $0.45  $0.40  $0.35

Earnings per share—diluted

  $0.44  $0.43  $0.35  $0.30  $0.51  $0.45  $0.39  $0.35
  Quarter Ended  Quarter Ended
  

Apr. 29,

2006

  

Jan. 28,

2006

  

Oct. 29,

2005

  

July 30,

2005

  Apr. 28,
2007
  Jan. 27,
2007
  Oct. 28,
2006
  July 29,
2006

Net sales

  $695,177  $682,402  $641,697  $595,847  $739,143  $709,494  $694,273  $655,488

Gross profit

   247,002   240,969   219,214   207,244   260,563   250,266   235,629   222,414

Operating income

   92,126   88,546   72,826   69,514   96,446   92,686   78,021   68,537

Net income

   56,819   54,004   44,720   42,882   59,924   58,591   48,237   41,584

Earnings per share—basic

  $0.41  $0.39  $0.33  $0.31  $0.44  $0.43  $0.35  $0.30

Earnings per share—diluted

  $0.41  $0.39  $0.32  $0.31  $0.44  $0.43  $0.35  $0.30

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 

Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Patterson Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those internal control systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of April 28, 2007.26, 2008. During its assessment, management did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8,Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an unqualified report on management’s assessment ofour internal control over financial reporting.

 

/S/    JAMES W. WILTZ        
President and Chief Executive Officer
/S/    R. STEPHEN ARMSTRONG        
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer

The report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of April 28, 2007,26, 2008, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’sSEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or person performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended April 28, 2007,2008, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

 

Item 10.DIRECTORS, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTAND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding the directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions set forth under the caption “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 10, 20078, 2008 (the “2007“2008 Proxy Statement”). Information regarding executive officers of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 20072008 Proxy Statement. The information called for by Item 10, as to the audit committee and the audit committee financial expert, is set forth under the captions “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors” and “Our Board of Directors and Committees” in Patterson’s 2007the 2008 Proxy Statement and such information is incorporated by reference herein.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted Principles of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics for its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Directors and all employees. The Company has made its Code of Ethics available on its website (www.pattersoncompanies.com) under the section “Corporate Governance.” The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its Code of Ethics by posting such information on its website at the address and location specified above.

 

Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information regarding executive compensation and director compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” in the 20072008 Proxy Statement.

 

Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captionscaption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the 20072008 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information called for by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the 20072008 Proxy Statement.

 

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information relating to principal accounting fees and services and pre-approval policies and procedures is set forth under the captions “Proposal No. 3 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Proposal No. 3 Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Firm – Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures of the Audit Committee” in the 20072008 Proxy Statement and such information is incorporated by reference herein.

PART IV

 

Item 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a)1. Financial Statements.

The following Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data of the Company and its subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8:

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  4344

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 28, 200726, 2008 and April 29, 200628, 2007

  4546

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended April 26, 2008, April 28, 2007, and April  29, 2006 and April 30, 2005

  4647

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended April 26, 2008,  April 28, 2007, and April 29, 2006 and April 30, 2005

  4748

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended April 26, 2008, April  28, 2007, and April 29, 2006 and April 30, 2005

  4849

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  4950

2. Financial Statement Schedules.

The following financial statement schedule is filed herewith: Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended April 26, 2008, April 28, 2007, and April 29, 2006, and April 30, 2005.2006.

Schedules other than that listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits.

 

Exhibit

   
2.1  Article of Merger and Plan of Merger dated June 23, 2004 10
3.1  The Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation 10
3.2  The Company’s Bylaws, as amended 1
4.1  Specimen form of the Company’s Common Stock Certificate 10
4.2Pursuant to Item 601 (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the registrant has omitted to file certain unregistered convertible debentures. The total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of such convertible debentures to the Commission upon request.8
  4.3  Credit Agreement dated as of November 25, 2003 among Patterson Dental Company, as the Company, the Subsidiary Borrowers from time to time parties hereto, the Lenders from time to time parties hereto, Bank One, NA (main office Chicago), as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent and Suntrust Bank, the Northern Trust Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents9
  4.44.3  Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2003 among Patterson Dental Company, AbilityOne Products Corp., AbilityOne Corporation, Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Webster Management, LP 9

Exhibit
10.1  Patterson Dental Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended 1

Exhibit

10.2  Patterson Dental Company 1992 Stock Option Plan 1
10.3  Patterson Dental Company 1992 Director Stock Option Plan 1
10.4  Patterson Dental Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan 1
10.5  Patterson Dental Company Capital Accumulation Plan 2
10.6  Patterson Companies, Inc. Fiscal 20082009 Incentive Plan
10.7  ESOP Loan Agreement dated June 15, 1990 as amended July 13, 1992 1
10.8  Amended and Restated Term Promissory Note dated July 13, 1992 1
10.9  Second Amended and Restated Contract Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2000 between Patterson Dental Company and U.S. Bank National Association 3
10.10  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 28, 2000 between Patterson Dental Company and U.S. Bank National Association 3
10.11  Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Patterson Dental Company and J. A. Webster, Inc.4
10.12  Third Amended and Restated Contract Purchase Agreement dated June 19, 2002 between Patterson Dental Company and U. S. Bank National Association 5
10.13  Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated October 7, 2004 between PDC Funding Company, LLC, Patterson Companies, Inc. and Bank One.One 12
10.14  Receivables Sale Agreement dated May 10, 2002 among PDC Funding Company, LLC, Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., and Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc.5
10.15  2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan 5
10.16  Amendments to Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan 5
10.17  Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan 5
10.18  Stock Option Plan for Canadian Employees6
10.19  Patterson Companies, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan 11
10.20  ESOP Loan Agreement dated April 1, 2002 7
10.21  Promissory Note dated April 1, 2002 between GreatBanc Trust Company, an Illinois corporation, not in its individual or corporate capacity, but solely as trustee of the Thompson Dental Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust and Thompson Dental Company 7
10.22  Bridge Credit Facility dated as of September 12, 2003 among Patterson Dental Company as the borrower and Banc One Mezzanine Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent.Agent8
10.23  ESOP Loan Agreement dated September 11, 200613
10.24  ESOP Note dated September 11, 200613
10.25  Receivables Sale Agreement dated April 27, 2007 among PDC Funding Company II, LLC, Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., and Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc. 14
10.26  Contract Purchase Agreement dated April 27, 2007 among PDC Funding Company II, LLC, Patterson Companies, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and The Northern Trust Company14
10.27Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2007, among Patterson Companies, Inc., as the Company, the Subsidiary Borrowers from time to time parties hereto, the Lenders from time to time parties hereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (Successor by merger to Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago)), as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and SunTrust Bank, the Northern Trust Company, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents. 15

Exhibit

10.28Note Purchase Agreement dated March 19, 2008 among Patterson Companies, Inc., Patterson Medical Holdings, Inc., Patterson Medical Supply, Inc., Patterson Dental Holdings, Inc., Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., Webster Veterinary Supply, Inc. and Webster Management, LP 16
10.29Term Loan Credit Agreement dated March 20, 2008 among Patterson Companies, Inc., as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties hereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (Successor by merger to Bank One, NA (Main Office Chicago)), as Administrative Agent16
10.30Accelerated Share Repurchase Agreement, dated March 19, 2008, by and between Patterson Companies, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 16
21  Subsidiaries
23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Exhibit
31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-4(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-4(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


1Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-51304) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission August 26, 1992.
2Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 1996.
3Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 29, 2000.
4Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 28, 2001.
5Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2002.
6Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 25, 2003.
7Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 26, 2003.
8Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 25, 2003.
9Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 24, 2004.
10Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004.
11Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K/A dated September 14, 2004, filed on September 29, 2004.
12Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 7, 2004, filed on October 12, 2004.
13Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated September 11, 2006, filed on September 12, 2006.
14Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated April 27, 2007, filed on May 3, 2007.
15Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated November 28, 2007, filed on December 3, 2007.
16Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated March 19, 2008, filed on March 24, 2008.

(b) See Schedule II.

(b)See Schedule II.

(c) See Index to Exhibits.

(c)See Index to Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

    PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.
Dated: June 27, 200725, 2008  By /S/    JAMES W. WILTZ        
   James W. Wiltz,
   President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

     

Date

/S/    JAMES W. WILTZ        

James W. Wiltz

  

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    R. STEPHEN ARMSTRONG        

R. Stephen Armstrong

  

Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    PETER L. FRECHETTE        

Peter L. Frechette

  

Director

(Chairman of the Board of Directors)

 June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    JOHN D. BUCK        

John D. Buck

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    RONALD E. EZERSKI        

Ronald E. Ezerski

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    ANDRE B. LACY        

Andre B. Lacy

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    CHARLES REICH        

Charles Reich

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    ELLEN A. RUDNICK        

Ellen A. Rudnick

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

/S/    HAROLD C. SLAVKIN        

Harold C. Slavkin

  Director June 27, 200725, 2008

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.

(Dollars in thousands)

 

   

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

  

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses

  

Charged

to Other

Accounts

  Deductions  

Balance at

End of

Period

Year ended April 28, 2007:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $7,031  $2,040  $500(3) $3,024(1) $6,547
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $33,984  $5,325  $—    $—    $39,309

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   6,040   7,206   73(3)  7,781(2)  5,538
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $40,024  $12,531  $73  $7,781  $44,847
                    

Year ended April 29, 2006:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $5,189  $2,764  $1,692(3) $2,614(1) $7,031
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $28,994  $4,990  $—    $—    $33,984

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   4,899   5,446   702(3)  5,007(2)  6,040
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $33,893  $10,436  $702  $5,007  $40,024
                    

Year ended April 30, 2005:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $5,437  $1,546  $211(3) $2,005(1) $5,189
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $24,864  $4,130  $—    $—    $28,994

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   7,001   3,626   230(3)  5,958(2)  4,899
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $31,865  $7,756  $230  $5,958  $33,893
                    

   Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Charged
to Other
Accounts
  Deductions  Balance at
End of
Period

Year ended April 26, 2008:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $6,547  $3,547  $216(3) $2,280(1) $8,030
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $39,309  $5,024  $—    $—    $44,333

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   5,538   10,704   849(3)  11,594(2)  5,497
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $44,847  $15,728  $849  $11,594  $49,830
                    

Year ended April 28, 2007:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $7,031  $2,040  $500(3) $3,024(1) $6,547
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $33,984  $5,325  $—    $—    $39,309

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   6,040   7,206   73(3)  7,781(2)  5,538
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $40,024  $12,531  $73  $7,781  $44,847
                    

Year ended April 29, 2006:

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $5,189  $2,764  $1,692(3) $2,614(1) $7,031
                    

LIFO inventory adjustment

  $28,994  $4,990  $—    $—    $33,984

Inventory obsolescence reserve

   4,899   5,446   702(3)  5,007(2)  6,040
                    

Total inventory reserve

  $33,893  $10,436  $702  $5,007  $40,024
                    

(1)Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
(2)Inventory disposed of or written off.
(3)Impact of acquisitions and foreign currency translation adjustments.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit 10.6  Patterson Companies, Inc. Fiscal 20082009 Incentive Compensation Plan
Exhibit 21  Subsidiaries
Exhibit 23  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-4(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-4(a) and 15d-14(a), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

7680