Index to Financial Statements

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009

For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2008

or

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                    .

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission file number: 000-50600

BLACKBAUD, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 11-2617163

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2000 Daniel Island Drive

Charleston, South Carolina 29492

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(843) 216-6200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange

    on which Registered    

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value 

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

(NASDAQ Global Select Market)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

YES  ¨    NO  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  ¨    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerate filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

                Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer  ¨
                Non-accelerated filer  ¨ Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES  ¨    NO  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 20082009 (based on the closing sale price of $21.40$15.55 on that date), was approximately $823,787,629.$588,267,650. Common stock held by each officer and director and by each person known to the registrant who owned 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 25, 200912, 2010 was 43,804,330.44,551,083.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders currently scheduled to be held June 16, 200923, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

 

 

 


Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

 

      Page

PART I

  

Item 1.

  

Business

  1

Item 1A.

  

Risk factors

  15

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved staff comments

  2627

Item 2.

  

Properties

  2627

Item 3.

  

Legal proceedings

  27

Item 4.

  

Submission of matters to a vote of security holders

  27

PART II

  

Item 5.

  

Market for registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities

  28

Item 6.

  

Selected consolidated financial data

  33

Item 7.

  

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

  35

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

  5658

Item 8.

  

Financial statements and supplementary data

  5658

Item 9.

  

Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure

  5658

Item 9A.

  

Controls and procedures

  5658

Item 9B.

  

Other information

  5759

PART III

  

Item 10.

  

Directors, executive officers and corporate governance

  5860

Item 11.

  

Executive compensation

  5860

Item 12.

  

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters

  5860

Item 13.

  

Certain relationships, related transactions and director independence

  5860

Item 14.

  

Principal accountant fees and services

  5860

PART IV

  

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and financial statement schedules

  5961


Index to Financial Statements

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSCAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” that anticipate results based on our estimates, assumptions and plans that are subject to uncertainty. These statements are made subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements in this report not dealing with historical results or current facts are forward-looking and are based on estimates, assumptions and projections. Statements which include the words “believes,” “seeks,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “intends,” “likely,” “targets,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or the negative version of those words and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements.

Although we attempt to be accurate in making these forward-looking statements, it is possible that future circumstances might differ from the assumptions on which such statements are based. In addition, other important factors that could cause results to differ materially include those set forth under “Item 1A. Risk factors” and elsewhere in this report and in our other SEC filings. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Item 1.Business

Overview

We are the leading global provider of software and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations. Our mission is to make the world a better place by working with the nonprofit community to improve lives. We support our mission statement through the following corporate values:

 

Our people make us great.

 

Customers are at the heart of everything we do.

 

We must be good stewards of our resources.

 

Innovation drives success.

 

Our actions are guided by honesty and integrity.

 

Service to others makes the world a better place.

Our customers use our products and services to help increase donations, reduce fundraising costs, build online communities and improve communications with constituents, manage their finances and optimize operations. We have focused solely on the nonprofit market since our incorporation in 1982. At the end of 2008,2009, we had approximately 22,000 customers spread over 55 countries. Our customers come from nearly every segment of the nonprofit sector, including education, foundations, health and human services, faith-based, arts and cultural, public and societal benefits, environment and animal welfare and international and foreign affairs.

Nonprofit industryIndustry

The nonprofit industry is large and growingdiverse

There were more than 1.7 million U.S. nonprofit organizations registered with the Internal Revenue Service in 2008, including 1.2 million charitable 501(c)(3) organizations and we estimate there are approximately another 2.0 million nonprofit organizations internationally. According to Giving USA 2009, donations to nonprofit

Index to Financial Statements

organizations in the U.S. in 2008 were $307.7 billion, amounting to 2.2% of U.S. GDP. The compound annual growth rate of donations over the 40 year period from 1968 to 2008 was 7.2%, not adjusted for inflation. These organizations also receive fees for services they provide which are estimated at approximately $850 billion annually.

Johns Hopkins University’s 2006 Nonprofit Employment Data Project, the most recent survey on nonprofit employment data, indicated that nonprofits employ nearly 10% of the work force in the United States and more if volunteers are included. There were more than 1.6 million U.S.Also according to this study, worldwide, nonprofit organizations registered with the Internal Revenue Service in 2007, including 1.1 million charitable 501(c)(3) organizations and we estimate there are approximately another 1.7 million nonprofit organizations internationally.

Index to Financial Statements

Donations to nonprofit organizations in the U.S. were $306.4 billion in 2007, amounting to 2.2% of U.S. GDP. The compound annual growth rate of donations over the 45 year period from 1962 to 2007 was 7.5%, not adjusted for inflation, according toGiving USA 2008. These organizations also receive fees of approximately $850 billion annually for services they provide. Worldwide, nonprofit organizations accountaccounted for $1.3 trillion in total annual expenditures, according to the Johns Hopkins University’s 2006 Nonprofit Employment Data Project.expenditures.

Traditional methods of fundraising are often costly and inefficient

Many nonprofits use manual methods or stand-alone software applications not designed to manage fundraising. Such methods are often costly and inefficient because of the difficulties in effectively collecting, sharing, and using donation-related information. Furthermore, general purpose and Internet-related software applications frequently have limited functionality and do not efficiently integrate multiple databases. Based on our market research, nearly a quarter of every dollar donated is used for fundraising expenses alone. Some nonprofit organizations have developed proprietary software, but doing so is expensive, requiring on-site technical personnel for development, implementation and maintenance.

The nonprofit industry faces particular operational challenges

Nonprofit organizations must efficiently:

 

Solicit funds and build contactrelationships with major donors;

 

Garner small cash contributions from numerous contributors;

 

Manage and develop complex relationships with large numbers of constituents;

 

Comply with complex accounting, tax and reporting issues that differ from traditional businesses;

 

Solicit cash and in-kind contributions from businesses to help raise money or deliver products/services;

 

Provide a wide array of programs and services to individual constituents; and

 

Improve the data collection and sharing capabilities of their employees, volunteers and donors by creating and providing distributed access to centralized databases.

In addition, as a result of the negative impact the recent economic environment has had on donations, we believe the nonprofit industry has an even greater need for operational efficiencies to maximize the services they can deliver. Because of these challenges, we believe nonprofit organizations can benefit from software applications specifically designed to serve their particular needs.

The Blackbaud solutionSolutions

OurWe offer a broad suite of products and services that address the fundraising needs and operational challenges facing nonprofit organizations by providing them with software and services that help them increase donations, reduce the overall costs of managing their businesses and build a strong sense of community while effectively managing communications with their constituents. We offer an operational platform through core software applications, plus an additional 40 extended applications to provide distinct, add-on functionality tailored to meet the specific needs of our diverse customer base. We provide our solutionsolutions to nonprofit organizations in several ways to our customers. Weways. Today, we offer our products principally on a perpetual license basis. In addition, aHowever, an increasing number of our products are offered on a software-as-a-service (SaaS), or as a “hosted” software offering.offering and we expect this trend to continue in the future. We also offer a suite of analytical tools and related services that enable nonprofit organizations to extract, aggregate and analyze vast quantities of data to make better-informed operational decisions. In addition, we help our customers increase the returns on their technology investments by providing a broad range of consulting, training and professional services, as well as maintenance and technical support.

Index to Financial Statements

Nonprofit organizations use our products and services to increase donations

Managing the fundraising process is a critical business function for nonprofits. Our fundraising and constituent relationship management solutions allow nonprofit organizations to establish, maintain, and develop their relationships with current and prospective donors and other constituents. Our fundraising products and services enable them to use a centralized database, as well as the Internet and an array of analytical tools, to facilitate and expand their fundraising efforts. In addition, we believe our products and services help nonprofit organizations increase donations by enabling them to:

 

Solicit large numbers of potential donors;

 

Deliver personalized messages that drive constituent action;

 

Provide an easy-to-use system for sharing and using critical fundraising information;

 

Utilize our Internet-based offerings to receive online donations and support online volunteer and events management; and

 

Simplify and automate business processes.

Nonprofit organizations use Blackbaud software, services and tools to improve operational effectiveness

Our comprehensive suite of software, services and analytical tools help nonprofit organizations manage the key aspects of their operations. By automating business processes, our products streamline operations for our customers and help to reduce the overall costs of operating their organizations. For example, The Raiser’s Edge and our other core products automate data collection processes, which eliminate cumbersome and inaccurate manual processes. We provide solutions that address many of the technological and business process needs of our customers, including:

 

Constituent relationship management;

 

Financial management and reporting;

 

Cost accounting information for projects and grants;

 

Integration of financial data and donor information in a centralized system;

 

Internet based fundraising, event,fundraising;

Event, data and information management;

 

Student information systems designed for independent schools and small colleges;

 

Ticketing management;

 

Data analysis and reporting tools and services;

 

Online interactive communities for social networking and relationship management;

 

Management of complex volunteer networks; and

 

Results tracking for multiple campaigns.

Our strategyStrategy

Our objective is to maintain and extend our position as the leading provider of software and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations. Key elements for achieving this objective are to:

Grow our customer base

We intend to continue to expand our industry-leading customer base and enhance our market position. We have established a strong market presence with approximately 22,000 customers and,customers. However, in a 2007 nonprofit market survey by Addison Whitney, only 30% of respondents were familiar with Blackbaud. We believe that the fragmented nature

Index to Financial Statements

of the industry presents an opportunity for us to continue to increase our market penetration. We plan to achieve this objective by leveragingmaking use of our experience, the depth of our product capability, our existing customer base,capabilities, and our strong brand recognition. We also intend to expand our overall sales efforts, especially national accounts and enterprise-focused sales teams.

Index to Financial Statements

Maintain and expand existing customer relationships

We have historically had success selling maintenance renewals and additional products and services to existing customers. In each of the past five years, an average of more thanapproximately 95% of our customers renewed their maintenance and support plans. We will continue to pursue opportunities to better serveexpand our existing customer base by increasing both the number of our products and services they use and the frequency with which they use them. To this end, we have dedicated sales teams that focus exclusively on selling products and services to existing customers.

Enable customers to effectively utilize the Internet as a comprehensive business tool

We will enhance our existing products and develop new products and services that will allow our customers to more fully utilize the Internet to effectively achieve their missions. Although online fundraising comprises a small percentage of all charitable contributions, our research indicates that online donations are growing as a percentage of total contributions. A study we conducted together with the ePhilanthropy Foundation found that online donations increased by 44% in 2008. We offer a variety of Internet applications and consulting services that allow nonprofits to use the Internet for online fundraising, e-marketing, alumni and membership directories, newsletters, event management and volunteer coordination.

Introduce additional products and services

We intend to use our expertise and experience in developing leading products for the nonprofit industry to introduce additional products and related services. We plan to build stronger relationships with existing customers and attract new customers. We believe that our existing proprietary software can form the foundation for an even wider range of products and services for nonprofit organizations. Our current products share approximately one-thirdover half of our proprietary software code and we anticipate that future product offerings will also share this backbone.were developed using common standards and practices. We believe this shared code allows us to more cost efficientlyeffectively expedite the development and rollout of product offerings and updates. In addition, we are building our future product offerings on a common platform, which we anticipate will improve our ability to create new products.offerings efficiently and expeditiously.

Pursue strategic acquisitions and alliances

We intend to selectively pursue acquisitions and alliances in the future with companies that provide us with complementary technology, customers and personnel with significant relevant experience, as well as to increase our access to additional geographic and vertical markets. We have completed significant acquisitions inover the past sixfive years, including the acquisition of Target Software, Inc. and Target Analysis Group, Inc., or the Target Companies, in January 2007, eTapestry.com, or eTapestry, in August of 2007, and Kintera Inc., or Kintera, in July of 2008.2008 and RLC Customer Centric Technology B.V., or RLC, in April 2009. We are also currently involved in a number of strategic relationships. We believe that our size and our history of leadership in the nonprofit sector make us an attractive acquirer or partner for others in the industry.

Enable customers to effectively utilize the Internet as a comprehensive business tool

We will enhance our existing products and develop new products and services that will allow our customers to more fully utilize the Internet to effectively achieve their missions. Although online fundraising comprises a small percentage of all charitable contributions, our 2007 State of the Nonprofit Industry survey indicates that online donations are growing as a percentage of total contributions and that nonprofits are benefiting from this trend. We have web-enabled our core applications and currently offer a variety of Internet applications and consulting services that allow nonprofits to leverage the Internet for online fundraising, e-marketing, alumni and membership directories, newsletters, event management and volunteer coordination.

Expand international presence

We believe the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia as well as other international markets represent growing market opportunities for our products and services. As further discussed below, we recently established a separate business unit to serve the needs of our operations in international markets and expand our presence in these markets. The acquisition of RLC in April 2009 provided us a foundation to expand into the Netherlands and other Western European markets. We currently have offices in Almere, Netherlands; Glasgow, Scotland; London, England; Sydney, Australia; and Toronto, Canada; and Sydney, Australia.Canada. We believe the overall market of international nonprofit organizations is changing. Donations to domestic and international nonprofit organizations are increasing in response to reductions

Index to Financial Statements

in governmental funding of certain activities. U.S.-based nonprofit organizations are growing their international activities and opening overseas locations. We believe the international marketplace is currently underserved and we intend to increase our international presence by expanding our sales and marketing efforts. We plan to make use of our installed base of customers to sell complementary products and services, and we plan to develop and offer new products tailored to international markets. In November 2008, we announced an association with a distributorship to offer eTapestry’s Spanish-language version of its on-demand fundraising software in Spain.

Index to Financial Statements

Products and servicesServices

We license software and provide various services to our customers. We generateDuring 2009, we generated revenue in six reportable segments and in four geographic regions, as described in more detail in Note 14 of our consolidated financial statements. These revenue segments are license fees, maintenance fees, and subscription fees for our software products, consulting and education services, analytic services and others. Effective January 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into three operating units, which we believe will better align our organization around key customer groups. The three operating units are the General Markets Business Unit, the Enterprise Customer Business Unit and the International Business Unit.

Software products

We offer nonprofit organizations a wide variety of software products, which can be used individually to help organizations with specific functions, such as fundraising, financial management, website management and prospect research, or combined into a fully-integrated suite of tools to help them manage multiple areas of their operations.

Fundraising and Constituent Relationship Management

The Raiser’s Edge

The Raiser’s Edge is the leading software application specifically designed to manage nonprofit organizations’ constituent relationship management activity. The Raiser’s Edge enables nonprofit organizations to communicate with their constituents, manage fundraising activities, expand their development efforts and make better informed decisions through powerful segmentation, analysis and reporting capabilities. It provides a comprehensive dashboard view that shows users important performance indicators for campaigns, appeals, funds, events, proposals and membership drives. The Raiser’s Edge is highly configurable, allowing a nonprofit organization to create numerous custom views of constituent records and automate a variety of business processes. Among other things, The Raiser’s Edge allows an organization to access extensive biographical and demographic information about donors and prospects, process gifts, monitor solicitation activity, analyze data and publish reports. The Raiser’s Edge improves operational efficiency and effectiveness by reducing overall mailing costs, offering faster data entry and gift processing, supporting major donor cultivation and using the Internet to send email appeals and accept online donations. The Raiser’s Edge also integrates with Microsoft® Office® to enable users to take advantage of additional functionality.

In addition to the standard functionality of The Raiser’s Edge, we have built a number of extended applications to address the specific needs of various market segments, examples of which are described below.segments.

Module Name

Key Features/Benefits

RE: Event

Helps plan, organize, and manage all aspects of fundraising events

RE: Volunteer

Coordinates an organization’s volunteer work force

RE: Member

Tracks the identity of members, manages membership activities

Recurring Gifts Management

Enables easy management and processing of monthly giving

RE: Search

Manages prospective, planned and major gift donors from identification and profiling to the cultivation and solicitation of major gifts

RE: Alum

Helps an organization reach, solicit and better manage its alumni constituency

RE: Tribute

Tracks all gifts made in honor or memory of an individual or individuals and facilitates properly acknowledging the donor and honoree

RE: Electronic Funds Transfer

Allows an organization to easily process gifts made by credit card or by direct debit from donors’ bank accounts

RE: NetSolutions

Enables online fundraising, e-marketing, event management, and volunteer coordination

Blackbaud Enterprise CRM

Blackbaud Enterprise CRM (Enterprise CRM) is a flexible, customizable, scalable and secure Constituent Relationship Management (CRM) solution that addresses the unique needs of larger nonprofit organizations. Blackbaud Enterprise CRM helps large

Index to Financial Statements

institutions build their brands, develop deeper and more personalized relationships with their constituencies and gain organizational efficiencies. Blackbaud Enterprise CRM brings together disparate information, such as annual and capital giving, gift planning, major giving, and alumni and parent systems, across multiple locations and within the departments and programs of a large organization. With a single system of record that can be securely and efficiently shared, larger organizations are able to turn their data into timely, actionable information that maximizes their advancementfundraising efforts, synchronizes campaigns across departments and programs, and strengthens relationships with constituents.

Index to Financial Statements

eTapestry

eTapestry is a SaaS donor management and fundraising solution built specifically for smaller nonprofits. It tracks donors, prospects or alumni while managing gifts, pledges, and payments. eTapestry has been built to be operated in a hosted environment and be accessed via the Internet. The latestThis technology provides a sophisticated system that is simple to maintain, costs little to operate and is intuitively easy to learn without extensive training. It offers nonprofit organizations a cost-effective way to manage donors, process gifts, create reports, accept online donations and communicate with constituents.

Online Solutions

Blackbaud NetCommunity

Blackbaud NetCommunity is an Internet marketing and communications tool that enables organizations that utilize the Raiser’s Edge software to build interactive websites and manage email marketing campaigns. With Blackbaud NetCommunity, organizations can establish online communities for social networking among constituents and also provide a platform for online giving, membership purchases, event registration, and more. Because Blackbaud NetCommunity integratesrequires the Raiser’s Edge database to operate, it can only be sold with Raiser’s Edge or to existing Raiser’s Edge customers. However, Blackbaud NetCommunity, in concert with The Raiser’s Edge, to givedoes provides a single source of up-to-date constituent information across an entire organization, regardless of how individual constituents interact and communicate with the organization.

Sphere eMarketing

Sphere eMarketing, delivered as software-as-a-service, provides organizations with an integrated system of applications to manage e-marketing, communications, programs, services and online fundraising. Sphere eMarketing enables an organization’s volunteers, members, donors and staff to share real-time data and information in an online community to better manage constituent relationships. Sphere eMarketing is designed to help organizations manage sophisticated and targeted e-mail campaigns with efficiency and control. Comprehensive real-time reports are available to help organizations make strategic data-driven decisions for future marketing campaigns.

Additionally, Sphere Connect, the Sphere open platform technology, provides organizations a developer-friendly interface with well documented and supported APIs, and a cost-effective approach to custom application development and integration to meet unique technology and business needs.

BlackbaudNow

BlackbaudNow offers small organizations a fast and simple way to develop an online presence and begin accepting online donations. It allows organizations, with no upfront cost, to publish a simple website, accept donations, manage constituent relationships, run reports and send emails to supporters. A PayPal® Donate button is built into the product.

Financial Management

The Financial Edge

The Financial Edge is an accounting application designed to address the specific accounting, analytical and financial reporting needs of nonprofit organizations. It integrates with The Raiser’s Edge to simplify gift entry processing and relate information from both systems in an informative manner to eliminate redundant tasks. The Financial Edge improves the transparency and accountability of organizations by allowing them to track and report from multiple views, measure the effectiveness of programs and other initiatives, use budgets as monitoring and strategic planning tools and supervise cash flow. As a result, The Financial Edge provides

Index to Financial Statements

nonprofit organizations with the means to help manage fiscal and fiduciary responsibility, enabling them to be more accountable to their constituents. In addition, The Financial Edge is designed specifically to meet governmental accounting and financial reporting requirements prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).

Index to Financial Statements

As with The Raiser’s Edge, we have built extended applications to address the specific functional needs of our customers examples of which are described below.such as Purchase Orders, WebPurchasing, Electronic Funds Transfer, Cash Management, Cash Receipts, Payroll, Fixed Assets, Student Billing, School Store Manager and Accounting Forms.

Module Name

Key Features/Benefits

Purchase Orders

Provides a variety of options for generating and tracking purchase orders issued to vendors

WebPurchasing

Automates the requisition and purchase order process by enabling multiple departments, sites and budget managers to make purchasing requests electronically in a web-enabled application

Electronic Funds Transfer

Allows an organization to make and record electronic payments

Cash Management

Provides on online register to manage and reconcile multiple bank and cash accounts in a centralized repository

Cash Receipts

Provides flexible means of recording and tracking where cash receipt amounts originated, produces a detailed profile of each related transaction and prints a deposit ticket

Payroll

Automates in-house payroll processing

Fixed Assets

Stores the information required to properly track and manage property and equipment and the costs associated with them

Student Billing

Provides independent schools the ability to perform billing functions and process payments

School Store Manager

Manages sales, inventory control, and other administrative tasks for school stores

Accounting Forms

Enables an organization to print certain accounting and business forms cost effectively

FundWare

FundWare is a fund accounting solution designed to provide nonprofit and/or government organizations with improved operational efficiencies, reporting flexibility and the ability to manage sophisticated fund allocations. It uses a configurable set of modules designed to provide functionality that meets an organization’s specific needs. FundWare unites accounting, budgeting and reporting tools with a built inbuilt-in audit trail and easy-to-prepare audit schedules. Users are able to easily produce GASB and FASB financial reports including indirect costs or complex revenue allocations. Further, users have the ability to conduct real-time budget monitoring, maintain budget modification histories, including comparisons between actual and revised budgets and prepare cross-fiscal year budgets. FundWare utilizes an Excel-based reporting tool that enables the use of current Excel spreadsheets and skills while linking to FundWare’s financial database, providing real-time information without the extra step of importing or exporting.

School Management

The Education Edge

The Education Edge is a comprehensive student information management system designed principally to organize an independent school’s admissions and registrar processes, including capturing detailed student information, creating class schedules, managing attendance records and performance/grades, producing demographic, statistic, and analytical reports and printing report cards and transcripts. With The Education Edge, an organization can keep biographical and address information for students, parents, and constituents consistent across all of its Blackbaud software products. This integrated system allows an independent school to reduce data-entry time and ensure that information is current and accurate throughout the school.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud’s Student Information System

Blackbaud’s Student Information System is a complete software solution designed for small colleges and other institutions of higher education with a full-time enrollment of less than 5,000. The solution links student information across all campus offices and includes functionality designed specifically to organize the admissions and registrar’s processes. In addition, Blackbaud’s Student Information System can be combined with other applications to offer integration across back-office functions, providing one-time entry for biographical information, financial reliability, and audit trail functionality. This helps significantly reduce time spent on data maintenance and creation of class schedules and allows institutions to communicate efficiently with prospects, students and alumni.

Ticketing

The Patron Edge

The Patron Edge is a comprehensive ticketing management solution specifically designed to help large or small performing arts organizations, museums, zoos and aquariums boost attendance and increase revenue. The Patron Edge can be integrated with The Raiser’s Edge to allow for a complete profile view of patrons, donors or visitors. The Patron Edge offers a variety of ticketing methods and allows customers to save time and costs by streamlining ticketing, staffing, scheduling, event and membership management and other administrative tasks.

Index to Financial Statements

Direct Marketing

Blackbaud Direct Marketing

Blackbaud Direct Marketing allows nonprofit organizations to achieve integrated campaign planning by managing direct marketing campaigns with multiple types of media and channels. It delivers campaign management capabilities including planning and budgeting, predictive analysis and list segmentation, campaign execution and performance measurement, and reporting. The result is that nonprofit organizations can more easily manage their marketing campaigns while maximizing the return on investment of their direct marketing efforts. Nonprofit organizations can integrate Blackbaud Direct Marketing with Blackbaud Enterprise CRM or The Raiser’s Edge to combine fundraising functions such as major giving programs, with direct marketing campaigns.

Events Management

Sphere Events

KinteraThe Sphere Friends Asking Friends (FAF) software product enables organizations to quickly and easily launch and manage online event fundraising websites. FAFSphere Friends Asking Friends facilitates growth in donations and participationsparticipation levels by providing participants tools to become fundraisers and recruiters on behalf of theirnonprofit organizations. It is used by organizations of all sizes and budgets to manage events ranging from regional to national.national events.

Consulting and education services

Our consultants provide conversion and implementation services for each of our software products. These services include:

 

System implementation, including all aspects of installation and configuration, to ensure a smooth transition from the customer’s legacy system and to create a more streamlined business workflow;

 

Management of the data conversion process to ensure data is a reliable and powerful source of information for an organization;

 

Business process analysis and application customization to ensure that the organization’s system is properly aligned with an organization’s processes and objectives;

Index to Financial Statements

Removal of duplicate records, database merging and enrichment, information cleansing and consolidation, and secure credit card transaction processing;

 

Database production activities, that includeincluding direct marketing, business intelligence, cultivation and stewardship processes; and

 

Website design services, Internet strategy consulting and specialized services, such as email marketing and search engine optimization.

In addition, we apply our industry knowledge and experience, combined with expert knowledge of our products, to evaluate an organization’s needs and provide business process improvement consulting. This work is performed by staff consultants who have extensive and relevant domain experience in all aspects of nonprofit management, accounting, project management and IT services. This experience and knowledge allows us to make recommendations and implement best practices to help our customers reach their goals. In addition, we offer software customization services to organizations that do not have the time or in-house resources to create customized solutions for our core products. We believe that no other software company provides as broad a range of consulting and technology services and solutions dedicated to the nonprofit industry.

We provide a variety of classroom, onsite, distance-learning and self-paced training services to our customers relating to the use of our software products and application of best practices. Our software instructors have extensive training in the use of our software and present course material that is designed to include hands-on lab exercises, as well as course materials with examples and problems to solve.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud OnDemand

The Blackbaud OnDemand hosting solution provides our customers with a convenient, affordable alternative to setting up and managing Blackbaud applications on their own. Our technical team will set up and manage on an ongoing basis the hosting of one or more Blackbaud systems on our secure servers and ensure that they are accessible and current on a 24/7 basis. All that is needed to connect is a web browser. We manage everything from initial data setup through network security configuration.

Analytics services

Target Analytics

Target Analytics was formed in early 2008 by combining Blackbaud’s prospect research division with the then newly acquired Target Analysis Group. It wasWe added to the offerings further enriched in 2008 with the P!N wealth screening service which was added with the acquisition of Kintera. Target Analytics offers a comprehensive range of products and services for nonprofit organizations’ analytics needs. These include donor acquisition and development tools, prospect segmentation, wealth identification and collaborative peer benchmarking. Target Analytics offers software, solutions, and services such as:

Acquisition ListsTarget Analytics’ acquisition mailing lists are built using a proprietary cooperative database designed exclusively for nonprofit mailing lists and response modeling. The database was developed to help locate the best prospects for each organization and make acquisition efforts more productive.

WealthPointA database screening solution that delivers detailed wealth identification information on prospects. WealthPoint provides initial prospect qualification, assists with prospect cultivation and delivers information on financial capacity.

P!N ServiceA wealth profiling and screening service that enables nonprofits to more efficiently identify, profile, monitor and rank the wealth of prospects in their databases. Additionally, this service enables nonprofits to edit, analyze, prioritize and combine external data collected from a wide range of sources with its internal donor database.

Index to Financial Statements

ProspectPointA custom data modeling solution that delivers critical information on a prospect’s or donor’s likelihood to make a gift to an organization. It analyzes current and historical data from external sources and behavioral trends to identify an organization’s best potential annual, planned and major giving prospects, as well as recommends appropriate “ask” amounts and gift types.

The Researcher’s EdgeResearchPointHouses all the resultsCombines public data with donor information from ProspectPoint, WealthPointa nonprofit’s database of records to build a complete view of prospects, enabling it to better target and an organization’s own research insecure gifts. It also enables organizations to help uncover major and planned giving prospects within a secure environment and allows prospect researchers to manage prospect research data.nonprofit’s database.

donorCentricsA set of strategic analytic and benchmarking tools designed to drive fundraising at nonprofit organizations. These reports uncover strengths and weaknesses in fundraising programs, highlight opportunities for growth and facilitate strategy-sharing across organizations.

Data Enrichment Services—ServicesServices that enrich the quality of the data in our customers’ databases. These include a service that finds outdated address files in the database and makes corrections based on the requirements and certifications of the United States Postal Service and a service that uses known fields in an organization’s constituent records to search and find lost donors and prospects.

Index to Financial Statements

Maintenance

Most of our customers enroll in one of our maintenance and support programs. In each of the past five years, more than 95% of our customers have renewed their maintenance plans. Customers enrolled in the plans enjoy fast, reliable customer support, receive regular software updates, stay up-to-date with support newsletters and have unlimited, around-the-clock access to support resources, including our extensive knowledgebase and forums. Customers who enroll in upgraded maintenance plans receive enhanced benefits.

Payment Processing

Our products provide our customers payment processing capabilities that enable their donors to make donations and purchase goods and services using numerous payment options, including credit card and ACH checking transactions, through secure online transactions. InThrough our Kintera division,Sphere products, we provide payment processing services in which we collect funds on behalf of our customers for a processing fee.

Customers

We have customers in every principal vertical market within the nonprofit industry. At the end of 2008,2009, we had approximately 22,000 customers that range from small, local charities to healthcare and higher education organizations to the largest national health and human services organizations. No one customer accounts for more than 2% of our annual revenue.

Sales and marketingMarketing

The majority of our software and related services are sold through direct sales forces, however the Target Companies, eTapestry and Kintera divisions also sell through a number of referral partners, agencies and service partners.forces. Our direct sales force is complemented by a team of account development representatives responsible for sales lead generation and qualification. As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately 452 sales and marketing employees. These sales and marketing professionals are located at our headquarters in Charleston, South Carolina, at the Target Companies’, eTapestry and Kintera’s home bases in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Indianapolis, Indiana and in San Diego, California, respectively.California. We also employ remote sales staff in metropolitan areas throughout the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 233 direct sales employees. We plan to continue expanding our direct sales force in the Americas, Europe and Asia.

Index to Financial Statements

OurAsia as market demand recovers from the current economic environment. During 2009, our sales force iswas divided into two main areas of responsibility:

 

Selling products and services to existing customers; and

 

Acquiring new customers.

In addition, a dedicated portion of our sales team is focused exclusively on large, enterprise-wide accounts. We have a group of sales engineers who support both new and existing customers in this market segment. In general, sales representatives are responsible for handling one product line in a designated geographic area. However, sales representatives for the K-12 independent schools market, small college market and the arts and cultural market are responsible for selling all of our software products.

We generally begin a customer relationship with the sale of one of our primary products, such as The Raiser’s Edge or Blackbaud Enterprise CRM, and then sell additional products and services to the customer as the organization’s needs increase.

We conduct marketing programs to create brand recognition and market awareness for our products and services. Our marketing efforts include participation at tradeshows, technical conferences and technology seminars, publication of technical and educational articles in industry journals and preparation of competitive analyses. Our customers and strategic partners provide references and recommendations that we often feature in our advertising and promotional activities.

Index to Financial Statements

We believe relationships with third parties can enhance our sales and marketing efforts. We have and will continue to establish additional relationships with companies that provide services to the nonprofit industry, such as consultants, educators, publishers, financial service providers, complementary technology providers and data providers. These companies promote or complement our nonprofit solutions and provide us access to new customers.

Corporate philanthropyPhilanthropy and volunteerismVolunteerism

We believe that service to others makes the world a better place and champion this value through our global corporate philanthropy and employee-focused programs. In addition to having employees select grant recipients for our endowment fund, we celebrate individual acts of service through a competitive grant program that honors excellent examples of volunteerism and benefits the organizations they serve.

Competition

The market for software and related services in the nonprofit sector is fragmented, competitive, and constantly evolving.although the competition is highly fragmented. For certain areas of the market, entry barriers are low. On the other hand,However, we believe our experience and product depth makes us a formidable competitor. We expect to continue to see new competitors as the market matures and as nonprofit organizations become more aware of the advantages and efficiencies attainable through the use of specialized software. A number of diversified software enterprises have made acquisitions or developed products for the market, including Sage and SunGard. Other companies, such as Microsoft, Salesforce.com and Oracle have greater marketing resources, revenue and market recognition than we do. They offer few products that are designed specifically for nonprofits, in addition to some of their products which have a degree of functionality for nonprofits that could be considered competitive. These larger companies could decide to enter the market with new, directly competitive products or through acquisitions of our current competitors.

We mainly face competition from four sources:

 

Software developers offering specialized products designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations;

 

Custom-developed solutions;

 

Providers of traditional, less automated fundraising services; and

 

Software developers offering general products not designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations.

Index to Financial Statements

We compete with several software developers that provide specialized products, such as on-demand software specifically designed for nonprofit use. In addition, we compete with custom-developed solutions created either internally by the nonprofit organization or outside by custom service providers. We believe that we compete successfully against these companies, as building a custom solution requires extensive financial and technical resources that may not be available or cost-effective for the nonprofit organization. In addition, the nonprofit organization’s legacy database and software system may not have been designed to support the increasingly complex and advanced needs of today’s growing community of nonprofit organizations.

We also compete with providers of traditional, less automated fundraising services, including parties providing services in support of traditional direct mail campaigns, special events fundraising, telemarketing and personal solicitations. Although there are numerous general software developers marketing products that have some application in the nonprofit market, these competitors have generally neglected to focus specifically on this market and typically lack the domain expertise to cost effectively build or implement integrated solutions for itsthe market’s needs. We believe we compete successfully against these traditional fundraising services, primarily because our products and services are more automated, more robust and more efficient.

Index to Financial Statements

Research and developmentDevelopment

We have made substantial investments in research and development and expect to continue to do so as a part of our strategy to introduce additional products and services. As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had approximately 362377 employees working on research and development. Our research and development expenses for the years ending on December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 and 2006 were $45.7 million, $38.7 million $28.5 million and $23.1$28.5 million, respectively.

Technology and architectureArchitecture

We have products such as Blackbaud Enterprises CRM and Blackbaud Direct Marketing that are built on the Microsoft® .Net™ framework platform. These products are web-delivered applications utilizing a Service Oriented Architecture built on Internet standards and protocols such as HTTP, XML and SOAP. This architecture is designed to support flexible deployment scenarios including both on-premise, as well as hosted by Blackbaud in a SaaS model. The applications expose web service application programming interfaces so that functionality and business logic can be accessed programmatically from outside the context of an interactive user application. This allows our customers to extend and modify the functionality of our applications without requiring them to make any source code or data modifications themselves. This is important for customers who want to customize our applications by incorporating their own business logic into key areas of the applications. The end result is a robust customization platform through which the application can be modified and extended without requiring source code alteration.

Our version 7.x generation products utilize a three-tier client server architecture built on the Microsoft® Component Object Model (COM). The architecture of both our .Net and COM-based development models ensure our applications are:

 

  

Flexible.Our component-based architecture is programmable and easily customized by our customers without requiring modification of the source code, ensuring that the technology can be extended to accommodate changing demands of our clients and the market.

 

  

Adaptable.The architecture of our applications allows us to easily add features and functionality or to integrate with third-party applications in order to adapt to our customers’ needs or market demands.

 

  

Scalable.We combine a scalable architecture with the performance, capacity and load balancing of industry-standard web servers and databases used by our customers to ensure that the applications can scale to the needs of larger organizations.

We have and intend to continue to license technologies from third parties that are integrated into our products. We believe that the loss of any third-party technologies currently integrated into our products would not have a

Index to Financial Statements

material adverse effect on our business, but this might change in the future. In addition, if we are unable to obtain licenses for third-party technology for future products, our product development could be delayed, which in turn could harm our business and operating results.

Intellectual propertyProperty and other proprietary rightsOther Proprietary Rights

To protect our intellectual property, we rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws in various jurisdictions, as well as employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and confidentiality procedures. We have a number of registered trademarks, including “Blackbaud” and, “The Raiser’s Edge” and “Blackbaud Enterprise CRM”. We have applied for additional trademarks. We currently have six patents pending on our technology, including functionality in The Financial Edge, The Information Edge, and ProspectPoint.

Index to Financial Statements

Employees

As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had 1,9771,956 employees, consisting of 452436 in sales and marketing, 362377 in research and development, 490508 in consulting and professional services, 260249 in customer support, 173166 in subscriptions and 240220 general and administrative personnel. None of our employees are represented by unions or are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We are not involved in any material disputes with any of our employees, and we believe that relations with our employees are satisfactory.

Available informationInformation

Our website address iswww.blackbaud.com. We make available, free of charge through our website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as is reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains these reports atwww.sec.gov.

Executive officersOfficers

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our executive officers as of February 25, 2009:2010:

 

Name

  Age   

Marc E. Chardon

  5354  

President and Chief Executive Officer

Charles T. Cumbaa

57

President, Enterprise Customer Business Unit

Kevin Mooney

51

President, General Markets Business Unit

Timothy V. Williams

  5960  

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary

Louis J. Attanasi

  4748  

Senior Vice President of Strategic Technologies

Charles T. Cumbaa

56

Senior Vice President of Products and ServicesProduct Development

Lee W. Gartley

  4445  

Senior Vice President, President of Target Division

Richard LaBarbera

60

Senior Vice President, Chief Executive Officer, Kintera DivisionAnalytics

Charles L. Longfield

  5253  

Senior Vice President, Chief Scientist

John J. Mistretta

  5354  

Senior Vice President of Human Resources

Kevin Mooney

50

Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Chief Commercial Officer

Heidi H. Strenck

  3940  

Senior Vice President, Controller, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary

Gerard J. Zink

  4546  

Senior Vice President of General Markets Business Unit Customer Support

Marc E. Chardonjoined us in November 2005. Previously, Mr. Chardon served as chief financial officerChief Financial Officer for the $11 billion Information Worker business group at Microsoft, where he was responsible for the core functions of long-term strategic financial planning and business performance management. He joined Microsoft in August 1998 as general managerGeneral Manager of Microsoft France. During his three-year leadership, the subsidiary remained one of

Index to Financial Statements

the three most admired companies by French professionals and achieved increased customer satisfaction. Prior to joining Microsoft, Mr. Chardon was general managerGeneral Manager of Digital France. He joined Digital in 1984, and held a variety of international marketing and business roles within the company. In 1994, Mr. Chardon was named director, officeDirector, Office of the president,President, with responsibility for Digital’s corporate strategy development. Mr. Chardon is an American/French dual national. He is an economics honors graduate from Harvard University.

Timothy V. Williamshas served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2001. Mr. Williams is responsible for all of our financial reporting and controls, as well as human resources and legal. From January 1994 to January 2001 he served as Executive Vice President and CFO of Mynd, Inc. (now a subsidiary of Computer Sciences Corporation), a provider of software and services to the insurance industry. Prior to that, Mr. Williams worked at Holiday Inn Worldwide, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Williams serves on the Board of Directors of PROS Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded software development company. Mr. Williams holds a BA from the University of Northern Iowa.

Louis J. Attanasihas served as our Senior Vice President of Products since January 2007, initially serving in this capacity as Vice President of Products in 1996. He joined us in May 1986, and served as a Software Engineer, Product Architect, and Product Development Manager before assuming his current role. Prior to joining us, he taught mathematics at the State University of New York at Stony Brook and worked as a Software Engineer at Environmental Energy Corporation. Mr. Attanasi holds a BS in Mathematics from State University of New York at Stony Brook and a MS in Mathematics from the University of Charleston.

Charles T. Cumbaa, has served as our President, Enterprise Customer Business Unit since January 2010. From, May 2001 to December 2009 he served as Senior Vice President of Products and Services, joined us in May 2001.Services. Prior to joining us, Mr. Cumbaa was an Executive Vice President with Intertech Information Management from December 1998 until October 2000. From 1992 until 1998 he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cognitech, Inc., a software company he founded. From 1984 to 1992 he was Executive Vice President of Sales and Services at Sales Technologies. Prior to that, he was employed by McKinsey & Company. Mr. Cumbaa holds a BA from Mississippi State University and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Lee W. Gartleyjoined us in January 2007 as a Senior Vice President as part of our acquisition of the Target Companies. Mr. Gartley remains as President of and is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Target division. Prior to joining the Target Companies in 1998, Mr. Gartley was a senior marketer with Art Technology Group from 1996 until 1998 where he helped to launch an online commerce platform. From 1992 to 1996 he was a management consultant with Boston Consulting Group working with clients in a variety of industries to develop and implement sound strategy. Mr. Gartley holds a BA in Physics from Bowdoin College and an MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

Richard LaBarbera joined Blackbaud with the acquisition of Kintera in July 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. LaBarbera served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Kintera from February 2007 to July 2008. He served as Chief Operating Officer of Kintera from February 2006 to February 2007. Prior to that, from July 2004 to February 2006, Mr. LaBarbera served as Chief Operations and Services Officer at Echopass Corporation, a leading provider of integrated CRM software-as-a-service and advanced call center solutions. Mr. LaBarbera, a high tech industry veteran with more than 30 years of operating experience, has worked with such leading software providers as Sybase, Niku, Amdahl, Storage Technology and IBM. He received an MBA from Georgia State University.

Charles L. Longfieldbecame our Chief Scientist in January 2007 as part of our acquisition of the Target Companies, both of which he founded. Mr. Longfield has extensive experience designing and implementing national as well as international constituency databases that address the fundraising information needs at many of the world’s largest nonprofit organizations. Mr. Longfield holds a BA in Mathematics and a M.Ed. from Harvard University and has over 30 years of experience helping nonprofits automate their fundraising operations.

John J. Mistretta, our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, joined us in August 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Mistretta was an Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Alternative Businesses at National

Index to Financial Statements

Commerce Financial Corporation from 1998 to 2005. Earlier in his career, Mr. Mistretta held various senior Human Resources positions over a thirteen year period at Citicorp. Mr. Mistretta holds a Masters of Science in Counseling and a BA in Psychology from the State University of New York at Oswego.

Kevin Mooney has served as our President, General Markets Business Unit since January 2010. He joined us in July 2008 as our Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing and Chief Commercial Officer. Before joining Blackbaud, Mr. Mooney was a senior executive at Travelport GDS from August 2007 to May 2008. As Chief Commercial Officer of Travelport GDS, one of the world’s largest providers of information services and transaction processing to the travel industry, Mr. Mooney was responsible for global sales, marketing, training, service and support activities. Prior to that from March 2005 to August 2007, he was Chief Financial Officer for Worldspan andfrom March 2005 until it was acquired by Travelport in August 2007. Mr. Mooney has also held key executive positions in the telecommunications industry. Mr. Mooney graduated from Seton Hall University and holds an MBA in Finance from Georgia State University.

Timothy V. Williamshas served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2001. Mr. Williams is responsible for all of our financial reporting and controls, as well as human resources and legal. From January 1994 to January 2001 he served as Executive Vice President and CFO of Mynd, Inc. (now a subsidiary of Computer Sciences Corporation), a provider of software and services to the insurance industry. Prior to that, Mr. Williams worked at Holiday Inn Worldwide, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Williams serves on the Board of Directors of PROS Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded software development company. Mr. Williams holds a BA from the University of Northern Iowa.

Louis J. Attanasihas served as our Senior Vice President of Product Development since January 2010. From January 2007 to January 2010, he served as our Senior Vice President of Products, initially serving in the capacity of Vice President of Products in 1996. From May 1986 to 1996, he served as a Software Engineer, Product Architect, and Product Development Manager. Prior to joining us, he taught mathematics at the State University of New York at Stony Brook and worked as a Software Engineer at Environmental Energy Corporation. Mr. Attanasi holds a BS in Mathematics from State University of New York at Stony Brook and an MS in Mathematics from the University of Charleston.

Lee W. Gartleyjoined us in January 2007 as a Senior Vice President as part of our acquisition of the Target Companies. Mr. Gartley remains President of, and responsible for the day-to-day operations of, Target Analytics. Prior to joining the Target Companies in 1998, Mr. Gartley was a senior marketer with Art Technology Group from 1996 until 1998 where he helped to launch an online commerce platform. From 1992 to 1996 he was a management consultant with Boston Consulting Group working with clients in a variety of industries to develop and implement sound strategy. Mr. Gartley holds a BA in Physics from Bowdoin College and an MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

Charles L. Longfieldhas served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Scientist since January 2010. He joined us in January 2007 as our Chief Scientist as part of our acquisition of the Target Companies, both of which he founded and then led as Chief Executive Officer since the early 1990s. Mr. Longfield has extensive experience designing and implementing national as well as international constituency databases that address the fundraising information needs at many of the world’s largest nonprofit organizations. Mr. Longfield holds a BA in Mathematics and a M.Ed. from Harvard University and has over 30 years of experience helping nonprofits automate their fundraising operations.

John J. Mistretta, our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, joined us in August 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Mistretta was an Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Alternative Businesses at National Commerce Financial Corporation from 1998 to 2005. Earlier in his career, Mr. Mistretta held various senior Human Resources positions over a thirteen year period at Citicorp. Mr. Mistretta holds a Masters of Science in Counseling and a BA in Psychology from the State University of New York at Oswego.

Heidi H. Strenckhas served as our Senior Vice President and Controller since January 2007. From October 2002 until January 2007, Ms. Strenck served as our Vice President and Controller. Ms. Strenck joined us in September 1996 and held key management roles as Accounting Manager from 1996 until 1997 and as Controller until 2002. Prior to joining us, she served as a Senior Associate with Coopers & Lybrand and as Internal Auditor for The Raymond Corporation. Ms. Strenck holds a BA from Hartwick College.

Index to Financial Statements

Gerard J. Zinkhas served as our Senior Vice President of General Markets Business Unit Customer Support since January 2010. From January 2007 anduntil January 2010, Mr. Zink served as our Senior Vice President of Customer Support sinceSupport. From June 1996.1996 until January 2007 he served as our Vice President of Customer Support. Mr. Zink is responsible for overall customer satisfaction, information technology and administrative services. He joined us in November 1987 and served as a Customer Support Analyst and Manager of Customer Support before assuming his current position.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Item 1A.Risk factors

Our business operations face a number of risks. These risks should be read and considered with other information provided in this report.

General economic factors, both domestically and internationally, might adversely affect our financial performance.

General economic conditions, globally or in one or more of the markets we serve, might adversely affect our financial performance. Weakness in the financial and housing markets, inflation, higher levels of unemployment, unavailability of consumer credit, higher consumer debt levels, higher tax rates and other changes in tax laws, overall economic slowdown and other economic factors could adversely affect donations to non-profits, reducing their revenue and therefore possibly their demand for the products and services we sell and lengthen our sales and payment cycles. During 2009, we experienced a decrease in demand for our products and services as difficult and uncertain economic conditions put pressure on the spending of many organizations in the nonprofit industry. Higher interest rates, inflation, higher costs of labor, insurance and healthcare, higher tax rates and other changes in tax laws, changes in other laws and regulations and other economic factors in the United States could increase our cost of sales and operating, selling, general and administrative expenses, and otherwise adversely affect our operations and operating results. These factors affect not only our operations, but also the operations of suppliers from whom we purchase or license products and services, a factor that could result in an increase in the cost to us of our products and services, reducing our margins.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from The Raiser’s Edge and Blackbaud Enterprise CRM, and a decline in sales or renewals of this or similar products and related services could harm our business.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of The Raiser’s Edge and Blackbaud Enterprise CRM, and other products that help customers manage constituent relationships and related services, and revenue from these products and related services is expected to continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenue for the foreseeable future. For example, revenue from the sale of The Raiser’s Edge and related services represented approximately 38%, 45%, 50% and 60%50% of our total revenue in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Revenue from the sale of Blackbaud Enterprise CRM and 2006,related services represented approximately 4%, 2%, and 1% of our total revenue in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Because we generally sell licenses to our products on a perpetual basis and deliver new versions and enhancements to customers who purchase

Index to Financial Statements

annual maintenance and support, our future license, services and maintenance revenue are substantially dependent on sales to new customers. In addition, we frequently sell The Raiser’s Edge or similar products to new customers and then attempt to generate incremental revenue from the sale of additional products and services. If demand for The Raiser’s Edge, Blackbaud Enterprise CRM or similar products declines significantly, our business would suffer.

We encounter lengthy sales cycles which could have an adverse effect on the amount, timing and predictability of our revenue and sales.

Potential customers, particularly our larger enterprise-wide clients, generally commit significant resources to an evaluation of available software and require us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them as to the value of our software and services. Sales of our software products to these larger customers often require an

Index to Financial Statements

extensive education and marketing effort. We could expend significant funds and management resources during the sales cycle and ultimately fail to close the sale. Historically, our software product sales cycle averages approximately two months for sales to existing customers and from six to nine months for sales to new customers and large enterprise-wide sales. Recently, we have experienced longer sales cycle times, delays and postponements of purchasing decisions by our current and prospective customers as a result of challenges posed upon nonprofit organizations by the weak economic environment. Our sales cycle for all of our products and services is subject to significant risks and delays over which we have little or no control, including:

our customers’ budgetary constraints;

the timing of our clients’ budget cycles and approval processes;

the impact of the macro economic environment on our customers;

our clients’ willingness to replace their current methods or software solutions;

our need to educate potential customers about the uses and benefits of our products and services; and

the timing and expiration of our clients’ current license agreements or outsourcing agreements for similar services.

If we are unsuccessful in closing sales after expending significant funds and management resources or if we experience delays as discussed above, it could have a material adverse effect on the amount, timing and predictability of our revenue.

We encounter long and complex implementation cycles, particularly for our largest customers, which could have an adverse effect on our profitability and the timing and predictability of our revenue.

Our implementation cycle for large enterprise-wide sales can extend for a year or more, which can negatively impact the timing and predictability of our revenue. The implementation of our products and services, particularly in our large Enterprise CRM engagements, involve complex configuration, business process reengineering and system interfaces. Our Enterprise CRM product offering is relatively new and we may not have historical experience with unanticipated implementation challenges or complexities that could arise in these engagements. Further, these projects typically are heavily dependent on customer participation, communication and timely responsiveness throughout the implementation cycle. As the complexity of these engagements increase, our revenues and profitability could suffer from having to perform unplanned incremental services at rates substantially below our normal hourly rates and from delays in project completion. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our products or if we experience delays, it could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and the timing and predictability of our revenue.

If our customers do not renew their annual maintenance and support agreements or subscriptions for our products or if they do not renew them on terms that are favorable to us, our business might suffer.

Most of our maintenance agreements and subscriptions are for a one year term. As the end of the annual period approaches, we pursue the renewal of the agreement with the customer. Historically, maintenance and subscriptions renewals have represented a significant portion of our total revenue. Because of this characteristic of our business, if our customers choose not to renew their maintenance and support agreements or subscriptions with us on beneficial terms, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

We might not generate increased business from our current customers, which could limit our revenue in the future.

Our business model is highly dependent on the success of our efforts to increase sales to our existing customers. Many of our customers initially make a purchase of only one or a limited number of our products or only for a single department within their organization. These customers might choose not to expand their use of or make

Index to Financial Statements

additional purchases of our products and services. If we fail to generate additional business from our current customers, our revenue could grow at a slower rate or even decrease. In addition, as we deploy new applications and features for our existing products or introduce new products and services, our current customers could choose not to purchase these new offerings.

The Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) pricing model is evolving and demand by our customers for this model is increasing. Our failure to manage its evolution and demand could lead to lower than expected revenues and profits.

In recent years, much of our revenue growth has been derived from increased subscription offerings, including SaaS. This business model depends heavily on achieving economies of scale because the initial upfront investment is costly and the associated revenue is recognized on a ratable basis. If Blackbaud failswe fail to achieve appropriate economies of scale or if Blackbaud failswe fail to manage or anticipate the evolution and demand of the subscription software pricing models, then our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

The market for software and services for nonprofit organizations might not grow and nonprofit organizations might not continue to adopt our products and services.

Many nonprofit organizations have not traditionally used integrated and comprehensive software and services for their nonprofit-specific needs. We cannot be certain that the market for such products and services will continue to develop and grow or that nonprofit organizations will elect to adopt our products and services rather than continue to use traditional, less automated methods, attempt to develop software internally, rely upon legacy software systems, or use generalized software solutions not specifically designed for the nonprofit market. Nonprofit organizations that have already invested substantial resources in other fundraising methods or other non-integrated software solutions might be reluctant to adopt our products and services to supplement or replace their existing systems or methods. In addition, the implementation of one or more of our core software products can involve significant time and capital commitments by our customers, which they may be unwilling or unable to make. If demand for and market acceptance of our products and services does not increase, we might not grow our business as we expect.

Index to Financial Statements

Because a significant portion of our revenue is recognized ratably over the terms of the contract, downturns in sales may not be immediately reflected in our revenue.

We recognize our maintenance and subscriptions revenue monthly over the term of the customer agreement. The term of the customer agreement which is typically 12 months, although, it can extend to three years. As a result, much of the revenue we report in each quarter is attributable to agreements entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in sales to new customers, renewals by existing customers or market acceptance of our products in any one quarter will not necessarily be fully reflected in the revenues in that quarter and will negatively affect our revenues and profitability in future quarters.

We encounter long sales and implementation cycles, particularly for our largest customers, which could have an adverse effect on the size, timing and predictability of our revenue and sales.

Potential customers, particularly our larger enterprise-wide clients, generally commit significant resources to an evaluation of available software and require us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them as to the value of our software and services. Sales of our software products to these larger customers often require an extensive education and marketing effort. We could expend significant funds and management resources during the sales cycle and ultimately fail to close the sale. Our software product sales cycle averages approximately two months for sales to existing customers and from six to nine months for sales to new customers and large enterprise-wide sales. Our implementation cycle for large enterprise-wide sales can extend for a year or more, which can negatively impact the timing and predictability of our revenue. Our sales cycle for all of our products and services is subject to significant risks and delays over which we have little or no control, including:

our customers’ budgetary constraints;

the timing of our clients’ budget cycles and approval processes;

our clients’ willingness to replace their current methods or software solutions;

our need to educate potential customers about the uses and benefits of our products and services; and

the timing and expiration of our clients’ current license agreements or outsourcing agreements for similar services.

If we are unsuccessful in closing sales after expending significant funds and management resources or if we experience delays as discussed above, it could have a material adverse effect on the size, timing and predictability of our revenue.

Our quarterly financial results fluctuate and might be difficult to forecast and, if our future results are below either any guidance we might issue or the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the price of our common stock might decline.

Our quarterly revenue and results of operations are difficult to forecast. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, fluctuations in revenue and operating results from quarter to quarter. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that such comparisons might not be accurate indicators of future performance. The reasons for these fluctuations include but are not limited to:

the size and timing of sales of our software, including the relatively long sales cycles associated with many of our larger software sales;

budget and spending decisions by our customers;

market acceptance of new products we release;

market acceptance of products we acquire;

Index to Financial Statements

the amount and timing of operating costs related to the expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;

changes in our pricing policies or our competitors’ pricing policies;

seasonality in our revenue;

general economic conditions; and

costs related to acquisitions of technologies or businesses.

Our operating expenses, which include sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses, are based on our expectations of future revenue and are, to a large extent, fixed in the short term. If revenue falls below our expectations in a quarter and we are not able to quickly reduce our operating expenses in response, our operating results for that quarter could be adversely affected. It is possible that in some future quarter our operating results may be below either any guidance we might issue or the expectations of public market analysts and investors and, as a result, the price of our common stock might fall.

Our services and subscription revenue produces substantially lower gross margins than our license revenue, and an increase in services and/or subscription revenue relative to license revenue would harm our overall gross margins.

Our services revenue, which includes fees for consulting, implementation, training, data and technical services and analytics, was approximately 33%, 36% and 32% of our revenue for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our services revenue has substantially lower gross margins than our product license revenue. An increase in the percentage of total revenue represented by services revenue would adversely affect our overall gross margins.

Certain of our services are contracted under fixed fee arrangements, which we base on estimates. If our estimated fees are less than our actual costs, our operating results would be adversely affected. Services revenue as a percentage of total revenue has varied significantly from quarter to quarter due to fluctuations in licensing revenue, economic changes, changes in the average selling prices for our products and services, our customers’ acceptance of our products and our sales force execution. In addition, the volume and profitability of services can depend in large part upon:

competitive pricing pressure on the rates that we can charge for our services;

the complexity of the customers’ information technology environment and the existence of multiple non-integrated legacy databases;

the resources directed by customers to their implementation projects; and

the extent to which outside consulting organizations provide services directly to customers.

Our subscription revenue, which includes fees for providing access to hosted applications, application hosting services and access to certain data services and our online subscription training offerings, has experienced the largest percentage revenue growth over the last three years. Subscription revenue was approximately 16%, 10% and 6% of our revenue for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our subscription revenue has substantially lower gross margins than our product license revenue. An increase in the percentage of total revenue represented by subscription revenue would adversely affect our overall gross margins. If nonprofits in general, and specifically our customers and prospects, desire to adopt our subscription offerings much more rapidly than we currently anticipate and we are unable to respond in a timely fashion, we could encounter significant effects to our business, including substantial capital expenditures, reduction in profitability, decrease in revenue growth and/or we could become potentially less competitive, resulting in a loss of market share.

Any erosion of our margins for our services and/or subscription revenue or any adverse changes in the mix of our license versus service and subscription revenue would adversely affect our operating results.

Index to Financial Statements

We might face challenges in integrating our recent acquisitions and, as a result, might not realize the expected benefits of this recent acquisition.

In July 2008, we acquired Kintera and during 2007 we acquired the Target Companies and eTapestry. Managing and integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired company can be a complex process. The integration might not be completed rapidly or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. The successful integration of the acquired companies will require, among other things, coordination of various departments, including product development, engineering, sales and marketing and finance. Further, a successful integration of the acquired companies internal control structure will be required. The diversion of the attention of management and any difficulties encountered in this process could cause the disruption of, or a loss of momentum in, sales or product development. The inability to successfully integrate the operations and personnel of our recently acquired companies, or any significant delay in achieving integration, could have a material adverse effect on our business and on the market price of our common stock.

If we are unable to retain key personnel of our recent acquisitions, our business may suffer.

The success of our recent acquisitions will depend in part on our ability to retain their engineering, sales, marketing, development and other personnel. It is possible that these employees might decide to terminate their employment. If key employees terminate their employment, the sales, marketing or development activities of the acquired companies might be adversely affected, our management’s attention might be diverted from successfully integrating the acquired operations to hiring suitable replacements and, as a result, our business might suffer.

Future acquisitions could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and strain our resources.

As part of our business strategy we have made acquisitions in the past, and we might acquire additional companies, services and technologies that we feel could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, enhance our technical capabilities, provide us with important customer contacts or otherwise offer growth opportunities. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks, including:

difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services, accounting and personnel;

difficulties in supporting and transitioning customers of our acquired companies;

diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;

risks of entering new sectors of the nonprofit industry;

potential loss of key employees; and

inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs.

Acquisitions also frequently result in recording of goodwill and other intangible assets, which are subject to potential impairments in the future that could harm our operating results. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders would be diluted which, in turn, could affect the market price of our stock. Moreover, we could finance any acquisition with debt, resulting in higher leverage and interest costs. As a result, if we fail to evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments properly, we might not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such acquisition and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate.

If the security of our software is breached, we fail to securely collect, store and transmit customer information, or we fail to safeguard confidential donor data our business and reputation could suffer.

Fundamental to the use of our products is the secure collection, storage and transmission of confidential donor and end user information. Third parties may attempt to breach our security or that of our customers and their

Index to Financial Statements

databases. We might be liable to our customers for any breach in such security and any breach could harm our customers, our business and our reputation. Any imposition of liability, particularly liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage, could harm our reputation and our business and operating results. Also, computers, including those that utilize our software, are vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions, which could lead to interruptions, delays or loss of data. We might be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect further against security breaches or to rectify problems caused by any security breach.

Index to Financial Statements

A compromise of our software or other problem that results in customer or donor personal information being obtained by unauthorized persons could adversely affect our reputation with our customers and others, as well as our operations, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties. In addition, a security breach could require that we expend significant additional resources related to our information security systems and could result in a disruption of our operations, particularly our online sales operations.

Privacy and security concerns, including evolving government regulation in the area of consumer data privacy, could adversely affect our business and operating results.

The effectiveness of our software products relies on our customers’ storage and use of data concerning their customers, including financial, personally identifying and other sensitive data. Our customers’ collection and use of these data for donor profiling might raise privacy and security concerns and negatively impact the demand for our products and services. For example, our custom modeling and analytical services, including ProspectPoint, WealthPoint and donorCentrics, rely heavily on securing and making use of data we gather from various sources and privacy laws could jeopardize our ability to market and profit from those services. If a breach of customer data security were to occur, our products may be perceived as less desirable, which would negatively affect our business and operating results.

In addition, governments2009, data security and privacy have remained material concerns for both our customers and state legislatures. Governments in some jurisdictions have enacted or are considering enacting consumer data privacy legislation, including laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing and use of consumer data. This legislation could reduce the demand for our software products if we fail to design or enhance our products to enable our customers to comply with the privacy and security measures required by the legislation. Moreover, we may be exposed to liability under existing or new consumer data privacy legislation. Even technical violations of these laws can result in penalties that are assessed for each non-compliant transaction. If we or our customers were found to be subject to and in violation of any of these laws or other data privacy laws or regulations, our business would suffer and we and/or our customers would likely have to change our business practices. In addition, these laws and regulations could impose significant costs on us and our customers and make it more difficult for donors to make online donations.

If we are unable, or customers believe we are unable, to detect and prevent unauthorized use of credit cards and safeguard confidential donor data, we could be subject to financial liability, our reputation could be harmed and customers may be reluctant to use our products and services.

Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology we use to protect sensitive transaction data. If any such compromise of our security, or the security of our customers, were to occur, it could result in misappropriation of proprietary information or interruptions in operations and have an adverse impact on our reputation or the reputation of our customers. All of our products are currently certified as Payment Application Data Security Standard compliant. Currently some of our products are not fully compliant with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, or PCI security standards.DSS. This or other factors could make customers believe we are unable to detect and prevent unauthorized use of credit cards or confidential donor data, which could harm our business. Additionally, these factors could make issuing banks believe the transactions of our customers are compromised and refuse to process those transactions, which could harm the reputation of our products and our business.

Index to Financial Statements

Additional PCI DSS standards go into effect next year. Conforming our products and services to PCI DSS is expensive and time-consuming. Our failure to maintain compliance with PCI DSS could make customers believe we are unable to detect and prevent unauthorized use of credit cards and bank account numbers or protect confidential donor data and our reputation and business might be harmed.

Index to Financial Statements

Our services and subscription revenue produces substantially lower gross margins than our license revenue, and changes in the relative mix of these and other sources of revenue could negatively affect our overall gross margins.

Our services revenue, which includes fees for consulting, implementation, training, data and technical services and analytics, was approximately 28%, 33% and 36% of our revenue for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our services revenue has substantially lower gross margins than our product license revenue. An increase in the percentage of total revenue represented by services revenue would adversely affect our overall gross margins.

Certain of our services are contracted under fixed fee arrangements, which we base on estimates. If our estimated fees are less than our actual costs, our operating results would be adversely affected. Services revenue as a percentage of total revenue has varied significantly from quarter to quarter due to fluctuations in licensing revenue, economic changes, changes in the average selling prices for our products and services, our customers’ acceptance of our products and our sales force execution. In addition, the volume and profitability of services can depend in large part upon:

competitive pricing pressure on the rates that we can charge for our services;

the complexity of the customers’ information technology environment and the existence of multiple non-integrated legacy databases;

the resources directed by customers to their implementation projects; and

the extent to which outside consulting organizations provide services directly to customers.

For example, revenue from our training services, which represented 17%, 22% and 23% of our total services revenue during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, has recently experienced a decrease in demand because existing and prospective customers have been experiencing budgetary constraints resulting from the challenges posed by the overall economic environment. The training services revenue typically has a higher gross margin than other services revenue. A continued decrease in the demand for training services could adversely affect our profitability and operating results.

Our subscription revenue, which includes fees for providing access to hosted applications, application hosting services and access to certain data services and our online subscription training offerings, has experienced the largest percentage revenue growth over the last three years. Subscription revenue was approximately 24%, 16% and 10% of our revenue for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our subscription revenue has substantially lower gross margins than our product license revenue. An increase in the percentage of total revenue represented by subscription revenue could adversely affect our overall gross margins. If nonprofits in general, and specifically our customers and prospects, desire to adopt our subscription offerings much more rapidly than we currently anticipate and we are unable to respond in a timely fashion, we could encounter significant effects to our business, including substantial capital expenditures, reduction in profitability, decrease in revenue growth and/or we could become potentially less competitive, resulting in a loss of market share.

Any erosion of our margins for our services and/or subscription revenue or any adverse changes in the mix of our license versus service and subscription revenue could adversely affect our operating results.

Index to Financial Statements

Our quarterly financial results fluctuate and might be difficult to forecast and, if our future results are below either any guidance we might issue or the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the price of our common stock might decline.

Our quarterly revenue and results of operations are difficult to forecast. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, fluctuations in revenue and operating results from quarter to quarter. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that such comparisons might not be accurate indicators of future performance. The reasons for these fluctuations include but are not limited to:

the size and timing of sales of our software, including the relatively long sales cycles associated with many of our larger software sales;

budget and spending decisions by our customers;

market acceptance of new products we release;

market acceptance of products we acquire;

the amount and timing of operating costs related to the expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;

changes in our pricing policies or our competitors’ pricing policies;

seasonality in our revenue;

general economic conditions; and

costs related to acquisitions of technologies or businesses.

Our operating expenses, which include sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses, are based on our expectations of future revenue and are, to a large extent, fixed in the short term. If revenue falls below our expectations in a quarter and we are not able to quickly reduce our operating expenses in response, our operating results for that quarter could be adversely affected. It is possible that in some future quarter our operating results may be below either any guidance we might issue or the expectations of public market analysts and investors and, as a result, the price of our common stock might fall.

Our failure to compete successfully could cause our revenue or market share to decline.

Our market is fragmented, competitive and rapidly evolving and there are limited barriers to entry for some aspects of this market. We mainly face competition from four sources:

software developers offering integrated specialized products designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations;

providers of traditional, less automated fundraising services such as services that support traditional direct mail campaigns, special events fundraising, telemarketing and personal solicitations;

custom-developed products created either internally or outsourced to custom service providers; and

software developers offering general products not designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations.

The companies we compete with and other potential competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources and generate greater revenue and better name recognition than we do. If one or more of our competitors or potential competitors were to merge or partner with one of our competitors, the change in the competitive landscape could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. For example, a large diversified software enterprise, such as Microsoft, Oracle or Salesforce.com, could decide to enter the market directly, including through acquisitions.

Index to Financial Statements

Our competitors might also establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with resellers and third-party consulting firms or other parties with whom we have had relationships, thereby limiting our ability to promote our products. These competitive pressures could cause our revenue and market share to decline.

If we fail to respond to technological changes to be competitive our business could suffer.

The software industry is characterized by technological change, evolving industry standards in hardware and software technology, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. The introduction of products encompassing new technologies can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to continue to enhance existing products and develop and introduce in a timely manner or acquire new products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner. Further, there can be no assurance that the products, capabilities or technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. If we are unable to develop or acquire on a timely and cost-effective basis new software products or enhancements to existing products or if such new products or enhancements do not achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

If we were found subject to or in violation of any laws or regulations governing privacy or electronic fund transfers, we could be subject to liability or forced to change our business practices.

It is possible that the payment processing component of our web-based software is subject to various governmental regulations. Any further legislation at the state and federal levels could also restrict further our information gathering and disclosure practices. Existing and potential future privacy laws might limit our ability to develop new products and services that make use of data we gather from various sources. For example, our custom modeling and analytical services, including ProspectPoint, WealthPoint, P!N and donorCentrics, rely heavily on securing and making use of data we gather from various sources and privacy laws could jeopardize our ability to market and profit from those services. The provisions of these laws and related regulations are complicated, and we do not have extensive experience with these laws and related regulations. Even technical violations of these laws can result in penalties that are assessed for each non-compliant transaction. In addition, we might be subject to the privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and related regulations. If we or our customers were found to be subject to and in violation of any of these laws or other privacy laws or regulations, our business would suffer and we and/or our customers would likely have to change our business practices. In addition, these laws and regulations could impose significant costs on us and our customers and make it more difficult for donors to make online donations.

If we do not successfully address the risks inherent in the expansion of our international operations, our business could suffer.

We currently have operations in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, and we intend to expand further into international markets. We have limited experience in international operations and may not be able to compete effectively in international markets. Our international offices generated revenues of approximately $40.3 million, $36.2 million and $26.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Accordingly, international revenue increased 11.3% and 38.2% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Expansion of our international operations will require a significant amount of attention from our management and substantial financial resources and may require us to add qualified management in these markets. Our direct sales model requires us to attract, retain and manage qualified sales personnel capable of selling into markets outside the United States. In some cases, our costs of sales might increase if our customers require us to sell through local distributors.

If we are unable to grow our international operations in a cost effective and timely manner, our business and operating results could be harmed. Doing business internationally involves additional risks that could harm our operating results, including:

difficulties associated with and costs of staffing and managing international operations;

differing technology standards;

difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;

political and economic instability;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

imposition of currency exchange controls;

potentially adverse tax consequences;

reduced protection for intellectual property rights in certain countries;

Index to Financial Statements

dependence on local vendors;

protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competition;

compliance with multiple conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations;

seasonal reductions in business activity specific to certain markets;

longer sales cycles;

restrictions on repatriation of earnings;

differing labor regulations;

restrictive privacy regulations in different countries, particularly in the European Union;

restrictions on the export of technologies such as data security and encryption; and

import and export restrictions and tariffs.

We have recorded a significant deferred tax asset, and we might never realize the full value of our deferred tax asset, which would result in a charge against our earnings.

In connection with the initial acquisition of our common stock as part of our recapitalization in 1999, we recorded approximately $107.0 million as a deferred tax asset. Our deferred tax asset balance of $71.6 million, of which $43.4 million relates to our 1999 recapitalization, was approximately 23% of our total assets as of December 31, 2008.

Realization of our deferred tax asset is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years to realize the tax benefit from that asset. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at least annually for realizability. A charge against our earnings would result if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. This could be caused by, among other things, deterioration in performance, loss of key contracts, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict the activities of or affect the products sold by our business and a variety of other factors. If a deferred tax asset was determined to be not realizable in a future period, the charge to earnings would be recognized as an expense in our results of operations in the period the determination is made.

Depending on future circumstances, it is possible that we might never realize the full value of our deferred tax asset. Any future determination of impairment of a significant portion of our deferred tax asset would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited.

Included in our deferred tax asset balance is $19.8 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards, which is approximately 6% of our total assets at December 31, 2008. Our federal net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations on how much may be utilized on an annual basis. The use of the net operating loss carryforwards may have additional limitations resulting from certain future ownership changes or other factors under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. If our net operating loss carryforwards are further limited, and we have taxable income which exceeds the available net operating loss carryforwards for that period, we would incur an income tax liability even though net operating loss carryforwards may be available in future years prior to their expiration, which would have an adverse affect our future cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

Index to Financial Statements

Our failure to compete successfully could cause our revenue or market share to decline.

Our market is fragmented, competitive and rapidly evolving and there are limited barriers to entry for some aspects of this market. We mainly face competition from four sources:

software developers offering integrated specialized products designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations;

providers of traditional, less automated fundraising services such as services that support traditional direct mail campaigns, special events fundraising, telemarketing and personal solicitations;

custom-developed products created either internally or outsourced to custom service providers; and

software developers offering general products not designed to address specific needs of nonprofit organizations.

The companies we compete with and other potential competitors may have greater financial, technical and marketing resources and generate greater revenue and better name recognition than we do. If one or more of our competitors or potential competitors were to merge or partner with one of our competitors, the change in the competitive landscape could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. For example, a large diversified software enterprise, such as Microsoft, Oracle or Salesforce.com, could decide to enter the market directly, including through acquisitions.

Our competitors might also establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with resellers and third-party consulting firms or other parties with whom we have had relationships, thereby limiting our ability to promote our products. These competitive pressures could cause our revenue and market share to decline.

We must respond to technological changes to be competitive.

The software industry is characterized by technological change, evolving industry standards in hardware and software technology, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. The introduction of products encompassing new technologies can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to continue to enhance existing products and develop and introduce in a timely manner or acquire new products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner. Further, there can be no assurance that the products, capabilities or technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. If we are unable to develop or acquire on a timely and cost-effective basis new software products or enhancements to existing products or if such new products or enhancements do not achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

Because competition for highly qualified personnel is intense, we might not be able to attract and retain the employees we need to support our planned growth.

To execute our continuing growth plans, we need to increase the size and maintain the quality of our sales force, software development staff and our professional services organization. To meet our objectives successfully, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel with specialized skill sets focused on the nonprofit industry. Competition for qualified personnel can be intense and we might not be successful in attracting and retaining them. The pool of qualified personnel with experience working with or selling to nonprofit organizations is limited overall and specifically in Charleston, South Carolina, where our principal office is located. Our ability to maintain and expand our sales, product development and professional services teams will depend on our ability to recruit, train and retain top quality people with advanced skills who understand sales to, and the specific needs of, nonprofit organizations. For these reasons, we have from time to time in the past experienced, and we expect

Index to Financial Statements

to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications for our business. In addition, it takes time for our new sales and services personnel to become productive, particularly with respect to obtaining and supporting major customer accounts. In particular,

Index to Financial Statements

we plan to continue to increase the number of services personnel to attempt to meet the needs of our customers and potential new customers. In addition to hiring services personnel to meet our needs, we might also engage additional third-party consultants as contractors, which could have a negative impact on our earnings. If we are unable to hire or retain qualified personnel, or if newly hired personnel fail to develop the necessary skills or reach productivity slower than anticipated, it would be more difficult for us to sell our products and services, we could experience a shortfall in revenue or earnings and not achieve our planned growth.

Further, in the past, we have used equity incentive programs as part of our overall employee compensation arrangements to both attract and retain personnel. The recentA decline in our stock price has negatively impacted, and may continue tocould negatively impact the value of these equity incentive and related compensation programs as retention and recruiting tools. We may need to create new or additional equity incentive programs and/or compensation packages to remain competitive, which could be dilutive to our existing stockholders and/or adversely affect our results of operations.

If our products fail to perform properly due to undetected errors or similar problems, our business could suffer.

Complex software such as ours often contains undetected errors or bugs. Such errors are frequently found after introduction of new software or enhancements to existing software. We continually introduce or acquire the rights to new products and release new versions of our products. If we detect any errors before we ship a product, we might have to delay product shipment for an extended period of time while we address the problem. We might not discover software errors that affect our new or current products or enhancements until after they are deployed, and we may need to provide enhancements to correct such errors. Therefore, it is possible that, despite testing by us, errors may occur in our software. These errors could result in:

 

harm to our reputation;

 

lost sales;

 

delays in commercial release;

 

product liability claims;

 

delays in or loss of market acceptance of our products;

 

license terminations or renegotiations; and

 

unexpected expenses and diversion of resources to remedy errors.

Furthermore, our customers may use our software together with products from other companies. As a result, when problems occur, it might be difficult to identify the source of the problem. Even when our software does not cause these problems, the existence of these errors might cause us to incur significant costs, divert the attention of our technical personnel from our product development efforts, impact our reputation and cause significant customer relations problems.

Our failure to obtain licenses for third-party technologies could harm our business.

We expect to continue licensing technologies from third parties, including applications used in our research and development activities, technologies which are integrated into our products and products that we resell. Although we believe that the loss of any third-party technologies currently integrated into our products would not have a material adverse effect on our business, this might change in the future. Our inability in the future to obtain any third-party licenses could delay future product development until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed and integrated. This inability in turn would harm our business and operating results. Our

Index to Financial Statements

use of third-party technologies exposes us to increased risks including, but not limited to, risks associated with the integration of new technology into our products, the diversion of our resources from development of our own proprietary technology and our inability to generate revenue from licensed technology sufficient to offset associated acquisition and maintenance costs.

Index to Financial Statements

We rely upon trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights, which might not provide us with adequate protection.

Our success and ability to compete depend to a significant degree upon the protection of our software and other proprietary technology rights. We might not be successful in protecting our proprietary technology and our proprietary rights might not provide us with a meaningful competitive advantage. To protect our core proprietary technology, we rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure agreements, each of which affords only limited protection. We currently do not have patents issued for any of our proprietary technology and we only recently filed patent applications relating to a number of such products. Moreover, we have no patent protection for The Raiser’s Edge, which is one of our core products and responsible for a significant portion of our revenue. Any inability to protect our intellectual property rights could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. It is possible that:

 

our pending patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents;

 

any patents issued to us may not be timely or broad enough to protect our proprietary rights;

 

any issued patent could be successfully challenged by one or more third parties, which could result in our loss of the right to prevent others from exploiting the inventions claimed in those patents; and

 

current and future competitors may independently develop similar technologies, duplicate our products or design around any of our patents.

In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights in our products to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Despite the measures taken by us, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology and information without authorization. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and litigation could become necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any litigation could be time consuming and expensive to prosecute or resolve, result in substantial diversion of management attention and resources, and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not successfully address the risks inherent in the expansion of our international operations, our business could suffer.

We currently have operations in Canada, United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia, and we intend to expand further into international markets. We have limited experience in international operations and may not be able to compete effectively in international markets. Our international offices generated revenues of approximately $39.7 million, $40.3 million and $36.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accordingly, international revenue decreased 1.5% in 2009 and increased 11.3% in 2008. Expansion of our international operations will require a significant amount of attention from our management and substantial financial resources and may require us to add qualified management in these markets. Our direct sales model requires us to attract, retain and manage qualified sales personnel capable of selling into markets outside the United States. In some cases, our costs of sales might increase if our customers require us to sell through local distributors.

If we are unable to grow our international operations in a cost effective and timely manner, our business and operating results could be harmed. Doing business internationally involves additional risks that could harm our operating results, including:

difficulties associated with and costs of staffing and managing international operations;

differing technology standards;

difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;

political and economic instability;

Index to Financial Statements

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

imposition of currency exchange controls;

potentially adverse tax consequences;

reduced protection for intellectual property rights in certain countries;

dependence on local vendors;

protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competition;

compliance with multiple conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations;

seasonal reductions in business activity specific to certain markets;

longer sales cycles;

restrictions on repatriation of earnings;

differing labor regulations;

restrictive privacy regulations in different countries, particularly in the European Union;

restrictions on the export of technologies such as data security and encryption; and

import and export restrictions and tariffs.

Restrictions in our revolving credit facility may limit our activities, including dividend payments, share repurchases and acquisitions.

At December 31, 2009 we had no borrowings under our revolving credit facility, however, we may draw on our revolving credit facility from time to time to help us meet our short-term financial needs. Our revolving credit facility contains restrictions, including covenants limiting our ability to incur additional debt, grant liens, make acquisitions and other investments, prepay specified debt, consolidate, merge or acquire other businesses, sell assets, pay dividends and other distributions, repurchase stock and enter into transactions with affiliates. There can be no assurance that we will be able to remain in compliance with the covenants to which we are subject in the future and, if we fail to do so, that we will be able to obtain waivers from our lenders or amend the covenants.

In the event of a default under our credit facility, we could be required to immediately repay all outstanding borrowings, which we might not be able to do. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed amounts borrowed under the credit facility and we have pledged the shares of certain of our subsidiaries as collateral for our obligations under the credit facility. Any such default could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate, including allowing lenders under the credit facility to enforce the guarantees of our subsidiaries or exercise their rights with respect to the shares pledged as collateral.

We have recorded a significant deferred tax asset, and we might never realize the full value of our deferred tax asset, which would result in a charge against our earnings.

In connection with the initial acquisition of our common stock as part of our recapitalization in 1999, we recorded approximately $107.0 million as a deferred tax asset. Our deferred tax asset balance of $61.3 million, of which $35.9 million relates to our 1999 recapitalization, was approximately 20% of our total assets as of December 31, 2009.

Realization of our deferred tax asset is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years to realize the tax benefit from that asset. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at least annually for realizability. A charge against our earnings would result if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. This could be caused by, among other things, deterioration

Index to Financial Statements

in performance, loss of key contracts, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict the activities of or affect the products sold by our business and a variety of other factors. If a deferred tax asset was determined to be not realizable in a future period, the charge to earnings would be recognized as an expense in our results of operations in the period the determination is made.

Depending on future circumstances, it is possible that we might never realize the full value of our deferred tax asset. Any future determination of impairment of a significant portion of our deferred tax asset would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited.

Included in our deferred tax asset balance is $17.3 million related to federal net operating loss carryforwards, which is approximately 6% of our total assets at December 31, 2009. Our federal net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations on how much may be utilized on an annual basis. The use of the net operating loss carryforwards may have additional limitations resulting from certain future ownership changes or other factors under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. If our net operating loss carryforwards are further limited, and we have taxable income which exceeds the available net operating loss carryforwards for that period, we would incur an income tax liability even though net operating loss carryforwards may be available in future years prior to their expiration, which would have an adverse affect our future cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

We might not be able to implement our operating unit reorganization successfully.

Effective January 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into three operating units to better align our organization around key customer groups. The three operating units are the General Markets Business Unit, the Enterprise Customer Business Unit and the International Business Unit. The successful reorganization of these operating units will require, among other things, coordination of direct revenue-generating activities, including sales, professional services and customer support within each unit. The diversion of management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in this process might negatively impact our ability to implement the reorganization and our goal to better align our operating structure with the different needs of the diverse types and sizes of organizations we serve and, ultimately, our ability to improve our competitive and financial performance in the future.

We might face challenges in integrating our recent acquisitions and, as a result, might not realize the expected benefits of these acquisitions.

In April 2009, we acquired RLC. During 2008, we acquired Kintera and during 2007 we acquired the Target Companies and eTapestry. Managing and integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired company can be a complex process. The integration might not be completed rapidly or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. The successful integration of the acquired companies will require, among other things, coordination of various departments, including product development, engineering, sales and marketing and finance. Further, a successful integration of the acquired companies internal control structure will be required. The diversion of the attention of management and any difficulties encountered in this process could cause the disruption of, or a loss of momentum in, sales or product development. The inability to successfully integrate the operations and personnel of our recently acquired companies, or any significant delay in achieving integration, could have a material adverse effect on our business and on the market price of our common stock.

Index to Financial Statements

Future acquisitions could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and strain our resources.

As part of our business strategy we have made acquisitions in the past, and we might acquire additional companies, services and technologies that we feel could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, enhance our technical capabilities, provide us with important customer contacts or otherwise offer growth opportunities. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks, including:

difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services, accounting and personnel;

difficulties in supporting and transitioning customers of our acquired companies;

diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;

risks of entering new sectors of the nonprofit industry;

potential loss of key employees; and

inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs.

Acquisitions also frequently result in recording of goodwill and other intangible assets, which are subject to potential impairments in the future that could harm our operating results. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders would be diluted which, in turn, could affect the market price of our stock. Moreover, we could finance any acquisition with debt, resulting in higher leverage and interest costs. As a result, if we fail to evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments properly, we might not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such acquisition and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate.

Increasing government regulation could affect our business.

We are subject, not only to regulations applicable to businesses generally, but also to laws and regulations directly applicable to electronic commerce and other regulations. Although there are currently few such laws and regulations, state, federal and foreign governments may adopt laws and regulations applicable to our business. Any such legislation or regulation could dampen the growth of the Internet and decrease its acceptance. If such a decline occurs, companies may decide in the future not to use our products and services. Any new laws or regulations in the following areas could affect our business:

 

user privacy;

 

the pricing and taxation of goods and services offered over the Internet;

 

the content of websites;

 

copyrights;

 

consumer protection, including the potential application of “do not call” registry requirements on our customers and consumer backlash in general to direct marketing efforts of our customers;

 

the online distribution of specific material or content over the Internet; and

 

the characteristics and quality of products and services offered over the Internet.

Pending and enacted legislation at the state and federal levels, including those related to fundraising activities, may also restrict further our information gathering and disclosure practices, for example, by requiring us to comply with extensive and costly registration, reporting or disclosure requirements.

Index to Financial Statements

Our operations might be affected by the occurrence of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event.

We depend on our principal executive offices and other facilities for the continued operation of our business. Although we have contingency plans in effect for natural disasters or other catastrophic events, these events, including terrorist attacks and natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes, could disrupt our operations. Even though we carry business interruption insurance policies and typically have provisions in our contracts that protect us in certain events, we might suffer losses as a result of business interruptions that exceed the coverage available under our insurance policies or for which we do not have coverage. Any natural disaster or catastrophic event affecting us could have a significant negative impact on our operations.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Item 1B.Unresolved staff comments

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Item 2.Properties

We lease our headquarters in Charleston, South Carolina which consists of approximately 230,000 square feet. The lease on our Charleston headquarters expires in October 2024, and we have the option for two 5-year renewal periods. We also lease facilities near Indianapolis, Indiana and in San Diego, California; Denver, Colorado; Cambridge, Massachusetts; Almere, Netherlands; Glasgow, Scotland; London, England; and Sydney, Australia. We believe that our properties are in good operating condition and adequately serve our current business operations for all of our business segments. We also anticipate that suitable additional or alternative space, including those under lease options, will be available at commercially reasonable terms for future expansion.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Index to Financial Statements
Item 3.Legal proceedings

From time to time we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising from our ordinary course of business. We do not believe that there are any claims or actions pending or threatened against us, the ultimate disposition of which would have a material adverse affect on us.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Item 4.Submission of matters to a vote of security holders

No matter was submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2008.2009.

Index to Financial Statements

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Item 5.Market for registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities

Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “BLKB” on July 26, 2004. On July 1, 2006, our common stock began trading on NASDAQ’s newest market tier, the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for shares of our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated. The prices are based on quotations between dealers, which do not reflect retail markup, mark-down or commissions.

Blackbaud quarterly high and low stock prices

 

  High  Low

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

    

First quarter

  $13.43  $9.15

Second quarter

   15.77   12.35

Third quarter

   24.40   13.52

Fourth quarter

   24.43   21.18
  High  Low        

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

        

First quarter

  $27.75  $23.23  $27.75  $23.23

Second quarter

   25.72   20.68   25.72   20.68

Third quarter

   22.69   17.86   22.69   17.86

Fourth quarter

   18.70   10.77   18.70   10.77
  High  Low

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

    

First quarter

  $26.38  $22.15

Second quarter

   25.29   21.57

Third quarter

   27.17   20.94

Fourth quarter

   29.74   25.11

As of February 13, 2009,12, 2010, there were 281237 stockholders of record and approximately 15,000 beneficial owners of our common stock. On February 13, 2009,12, 2010, the closing price of our common stock was $11.47.$22.17.

Index to Financial Statements

Stock performance graph

The following performance graph compares the performance of our common stock to the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) Total Market Return Index for the NASDAQ Stock Market and to a peer group industry index based on the standard industrial code for computer programming, data processing and other computer-related services. The graph covers the most recent five-year period from July 26, 2004, the first date our common stock was traded on NASDAQ, toending December 31, 2008.2009. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each index was $100 at July 26,December 31, 2004, and that all dividends are reinvested. We paid quarterly dividends at an annual rate of $0.40, $0.40, $0.34 and $0.28 per share for the years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

  7/26/04  12/31/04  12/30/05  12/29/06  12/31/07  12/31/08  12/31/2004  12/30/2005  12/29/2006  12/31/2007  12/31/2008  12/31/2009

Blackbaud Common Stock

  $100.00  $167.31  $194.45  $297.48  $320.86  $154.59  $100.00  $116.92  $177.93  $191.93  $92.42  $161.78

CRSP Total Market Return Index

  $100.00  $117.70  $120.20  $132.06  $143.21  $69.07  $100.00  $102.13  $112.20  $121.67  $58.68  $84.28

Peer Group

  $100.00  $121.09  $125.20  $140.57  $171.77  $98.87  $100.00  $103.39  $116.09  $141.85  $81.65  $133.45

Index to Financial Statements

Issuer purchases of issuer securities

 

Period  Total
number of
shares
purchased(1)
  

Average

price paid
per share

  Total number
of shares
purchased as
part of publicly
announced
plans or
programs
  

Approximate
dollar value of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plan
or programs

(in thousands)

Beginning balance, October 1, 2008

            $32,423

October 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008

  —    $—    —    $32,423

November 1, 2008 through November 30, 2008

  244,713  $11.83  —    $30,770

December 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

  —    $—    —    $30,770

Total

  244,713  $11.83  —    $30,770
Period  Total
number of
shares
purchased(1)
  Average
price paid
per share
  Total number
of shares
purchased as
part of publicly
announced
plans or
programs
  

Approximate
dollar value of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plan
or programs

(in thousands)

Beginning balance, October 1, 2009

            $30,770

October 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009

  26,197  $22.22  —    $30,770

November 1, 2009 through November 30, 2009

  114,697  $22.07  —    $30,770

December 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009

  110  $23.63  —    $30,770

Total

  141,004  $22.10  —    $30,770
(1)Includes 99,303During the period, there were no shares repurchased. The shares in the table represent shares withheld by us to satisfy the tax obligations of employees due upon vesting of restricted stock and exercise of stock appreciation rights during the period.

Dividend policy and restrictions

Our Board of Directors has adopted a dividend policy which reflects an intention to distribute to our stockholders a portion of the cash generated by our business that exceeds our operating needs and capital expenditures as regular quarterly dividends. This policy reflects our judgment that we can provide greater value to our stockholders by distributing to them a portion of the cash generated by our business.

In accordance with this dividend policy, we paid quarterly dividends at an annual rate of $0.40 per share in 2009 and $0.34 per share in 2008, and 2007, respectively, resulting in an aggregate dividend payment to stockholders of $17.7 million and $17.5 million in 2009 and $15.1 million in 2008, and 2007, respectively. In February 2009,2010, our Board of Directors approved an annual dividend rate of $0.40$0.44 per share for 2009.2010. We declared a first quarter dividend of $0.10$0.11 per share payable on March 13, 200915, 2010 to stockholders of record on February 27, 2009,26, 2010, and currently intend to pay quarterly dividends at aan annual rate of $0.40$0.44 per share of common stock for each of the remaining fiscal quarters in 2009.2010. Dividends at this rate would total approximately $17.6$19.4 million in the aggregate on the common stock in 20092010 (assuming 4444.0 million shares of common stock are outstanding, net of treasury stock).

Dividends on our common stock will not be cumulative. Consequently, if dividends on our common stock are not declared and/or paid at the targeted level, our stockholders will not be entitled to receive such payments in the future. We are not obligated to pay dividends, and as described more fully below, our stockholders might not receive any dividends as a result of the following factors:

 

our credit facility limits the amount of dividends we are permitted to pay;

 

our Board of Directors could decide to reduce dividends or not to pay dividends at all, at any time and for any reason;

 

the amount of dividends distributed is subject to state law restrictions; and

 

we might not have enough cash to pay dividends due to changes to our operating earnings, working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs.

Assumptions and considerations

We estimate that the cash necessary to fund dividends on our common stock for 20092010 at an annual rate of $0.40$0.44 per share is approximately $17.6$19.4 million (assuming 4444.0 million shares of common stock are outstanding, net of treasury stock).

Index to Financial Statements

OnIn May 7, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorized us to purchase up to $40 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. The prior program was terminated at that date and the remaining balance that was authorized but not used under the prior stock repurchase program was included in the amount authorized under the new program. The new program does not have an expiration date. The shares could be purchased in conjunction with a public offering of our stock, from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending upon market conditions and other factors, all in accordance with the requirements of applicable law. As of February 13, 2009,12, 2010, we had purchased 520,423 shares of common stock for $9.2 million pursuant to this program. Any open market purchases under the repurchase program will be made in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all other applicable securities regulations. We might not purchase any additional shares of common stock and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, to cancel the stock repurchase program.

We believe that our cash on hand and the cash flows we expect to generate from operations will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements through 2009,2010, including dividends and purchases under our stock repurchase program. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of operations—Liquidity and capital resources” in this report.

If our assumptions as to operating expenses, working capital requirements and capital expenditures are too low or if unexpected cash needs arise that we are not able to fund with cash on hand or with borrowings under our credit facility, we would need to either reduce or eliminate dividends. If we were to use working capital or permanent borrowings to fund dividends, we would have less cash available for future dividends and other purposes, which could negatively impact our stock price, financial condition, our results of operations and our ability to maintain or expand our business.

We have estimated our dividend only for 2009,2010, and we cannot assure our stockholders that during or following such periods that we will pay dividends at the estimated levels, or at all. We are not required to pay dividends and our Board of Directors may modify or revoke our dividend policy at any time. Dividend payments are within the absolute discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon many factors and future developments that could differ materially from our current expectations. Indeed, over time our capital and other cash needs, including unexpected cash needs, will invariably change and remain subject to uncertainties, which could impact the level of any dividends we pay in the future.

We believe that our dividend policy could limit, but not preclude, our ability to pursue growth as we intend to retain sufficient cash after the distribution of dividends to permit the pursuit of growth opportunities that do not require material capital investments. In order to pay dividends at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy and to fund any substantial portion of our stock repurchase program, we expect that we could require financing or borrowings to fund any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth opportunities requiring capital expenditures significantly beyond our anticipated capital expenditure levels. Management will evaluate potential growth opportunities as they arise and, if our Board of Directors determines that it is in our best interest to use cash that would otherwise be available for distribution as dividends to pursue an acquisition opportunity, to materially increase capital spending or for some other purpose, the Board would be free to depart from or change our dividend policy at any time.

Restrictions on payment of dividends

Under Delaware law, we can only pay dividends either out of “surplus” (which is defined as total assets at fair market value minus total liabilities, minus statutory capital) or out of current or the immediately preceding year’s earnings. As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had approximately $16.4$22.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, we anticipate that we will have sufficient earnings in 20092010 to pay dividends at the level described above. Although we believe we will have sufficient surplus and earnings to pay dividends at the anticipated levels for 2009,2010, our Board of Directors will seek periodically to assure itself of this sufficiency before actually declaring any dividends.

Index to Financial Statements

Our credit facility with Wachovia Bank, N.A. dated July 25, 2007 restricts our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock as follows:

 

In order to pay any cash dividends and/or repurchase shares of stock: (1) no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing under the credit facility; (2) we must be in compliance with a leverage ratio set forth in the credit agreement and (3) we must have cash on hand (which includes any unused amounts under the credit facility) of at least $10.0 million; each after giving effect to the payment of dividends and/or the repurchase of shares.

Index to Financial Statements
Item 6.Selected consolidated financial data

Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. The following data, insofar as it relates to each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006,2007, has been derived from the audited annual financial statements, including the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. The following data, insofar as it relates to each of the years ended December 31, 20052006 and 20042005 and the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived from audited financial statements not included in this report. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 is derived from our accounting records.

As described in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, we made business acquisitions in 2008, 2007 and 2006, which could affect the comparability of the information presented.

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004   2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 

Consolidated statements of operations data:

            

Revenue

            

License fees

  $35,932  $37,569  $32,500  $29,978  $25,387   $25,392   $35,932   $37,569   $32,500   $29,978  

Services

   100,824   91,376   61,242   52,606   42,793    87,834    100,824    91,376    61,242    52,606  

Maintenance

   107,304   94,602   80,893   71,163   63,081    116,476    107,304    94,602    80,893    71,163  

Subscriptions

   49,705   25,389   10,605   6,965   3,686    72,898    49,705    25,389    10,605    6,965  

Other revenue

   8,730   8,102   6,140   5,237   4,316    6,738    8,730    8,102    6,140    5,237  
          

Total revenue

   302,495   257,038   191,380   165,949   139,263    309,338    302,495    257,038    191,380    165,949  
          

Cost of revenue

            

Cost of license fees

   3,316   2,870   2,260   4,380   3,545    3,582    3,316    2,870    2,260    4,380  

Cost of services(1)

   63,960   54,908   33,717   28,409   22,807    61,713    63,960    54,908    33,717    28,409  

Cost of maintenance(1)

   20,185   17,119   13,225   10,926   10,474    21,364    20,185    17,119    13,225    10,926  

Cost of subscriptions(1)

   20,587   10,306   2,360   1,472   388    28,183    20,587    10,306    2,360    1,472  

Cost of other revenue

   8,368   7,274   5,709   4,943   3,986    6,098    8,368    7,274    5,709    4,943  
          

Total cost of revenue

   116,416   92,477   57,271   50,130   41,200    120,940    116,416    92,477    57,271    50,130  
          

Gross profit

   186,079   164,561   134,109   115,819   98,063    188,398    186,079    164,561    134,109    115,819  

Operating expenses

        

Sales and marketing(1)

   65,185   56,994   41,405   33,491   26,663    62,796    65,185    56,994    41,405    33,491  

Research and development(1)

   38,708   28,525   23,118   21,138   17,418    45,662    38,708    28,525    23,118    21,138  

General and administrative(1)

   34,072   26,144   21,757   15,795   32,512    33,380    34,072    26,144    21,757    15,795  

Amortization

   713   491   699   18   32    768    713    491    699    18  

Cost of initial public offering

   —     —     —     —     2,455 
          

Total operating expenses

   138,678   112,154   86,979   70,442   79,080    142,606    138,678    112,154    86,979    70,442  
          

Income from operations

   47,401   52,407   47,130   45,377   18,983    45,792    47,401    52,407    47,130    45,377  

Interest income

   526   813   1,584   964   331    637    526    813    1,584    964  

Interest expense

   (1,526)  (1,164)  (48)  (49)  (272)   (962  (1,526  (1,164  (48  (49

Other (expense) income, net

   (194)  (503)  (238)  6   356 

Other income (expense), net

   220    (194  (503  (238  6  
          

Income before provision for income taxes

   46,207   51,553   48,428   46,298   19,398    45,687    46,207    51,553    48,428    46,298  
     

Income tax provision

   16,329   19,829   18,275   13,211   6,848    17,240    16,329    19,829    18,275    13,211  
          

Net income

  $29,878  $31,724  $30,153  $33,087  $12,550   $28,447   $29,878   $31,724   $30,153   $33,087  
          

Earnings per share

            

Basic

  $0.70  $0.73  $0.70  $0.78  $0.30   $0.67   $0.70   $0.73   $0.70   $0.78  

Diluted

  $0.68  $0.71  $0.68  $0.72  $0.27   $0.65   $0.68   $0.71   $0.68   $0.72  

Common shares and equivalents outstanding

        

Basic weighted average shares

   42,959   43,619   43,320   42,559   42,496    42,771    42,959    43,619    43,320    42,559  

Diluted weighted average shares

   43,959   44,595   44,668   46,210   46,541    43,600    43,959    44,595    44,668    46,210  

Dividends per share

  $0.40  $0.34  $0.28  $0.20  $—     $0.40   $0.40   $0.34   $0.28   $0.20  

Index to Financial Statements
  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)  2008  2007  2006  2005 2004 
(in thousands)  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 

Summary of stock-based compensation (benefit):

                   

Cost of services

  $1,442  $627  $531  $269  $(540)  $1,433  $1,442  $627  $531  $269  

Cost of maintenance

   534   234   117   33   (91)   750   534   234   117   33  

Cost of subscriptions

   283   274   19   —     —      387   283   274   19   —    
          

Total included in cost of revenue

   2,259   1,135   667   302   (631)   2,570   2,259   1,135   667   302  
          

Sales and marketing

   1,607   831   813   217   (112)   1,605   1,607   831   813   217  

Research and development

   2,396   1,219   746   139   (457)   2,944   2,396   1,219   746   139  

General and administrative

   5,823   3,749   5,174   (343)  19,579    5,168   5,823   3,749   5,174   (343
          

Total included in operating expenses

   9,826   5,799   6,733   13   19,010    9,717   9,826   5,799   6,733   13  
          

Total stock-based compensation

  $12,085  $6,934  $7,400  $315  $18,379   $12,287  $12,085  $6,934  $7,400  $315  
          

 

(1)Includes stock-based compensation as set forth in tabular summary of stock-based compensation (benefit) for all periods presented. We adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006.

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)  2008 2007 2006  2005 2004 
(in thousands)  2009 2008 2007 2006  2005 

Consolidated balance sheet data:

              

Cash and cash equivalents

  $16,361  $14,775  $67,783  $22,683  $42,144   $22,769   $16,361   $14,775   $67,783  $22,683  

Deferred tax asset, including current portion

   71,620   53,972   67,620   80,052   88,896    61,298    71,620    53,972    67,620   80,052  

Working capital (deficit)

   (109,962)  (46,977)  14,125   (16,866)  (7,542)   (70,485  (109,962  (46,977  14,125   (16,866

Total assets

   313,886   237,694   195,009   148,463   161,640    304,229    313,886    237,694    195,009   148,463  

Deferred revenue

   119,640   96,100   76,952   63,222   54,440    135,584    119,640    96,100    76,952   63,222  

Total liabilities

   223,378   124,591   99,651   83,711   73,156    188,123    223,378    124,591    99,651   83,711  

Common stock

   51   50   49   48   43    52    51    50    49   48  

Additional paid-in capital

   116,846   105,687   88,409   73,583   55,292    134,726    116,846    105,687    88,409   73,583  

Total stockholders’ equity

  $90,508  $113,103  $95,358  $64,752  $88,484   $116,106   $90,508   $113,103   $95,358  $64,752  

Index to Financial Statements
Item 7.Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Item 1.A Risk Factors and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those set forth under “Cautionary statement” included in this “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and elsewhere in this report, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results.

Executive summary

We are the leading global provider of software and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations. Our products and services enable nonprofit organizations to increase donations, reduce fundraising costs, improve communications with constituents, manage finances and optimize internal operations. We have focused solely on the nonprofit market since our incorporation in 1982 and have developed our suite of products and services based upon our extensive knowledge of the operating challenges facing nonprofit organizations. At the end of 2008,2009, we had approximately 22,000 active customers. Our customers operate in multiple verticals within the nonprofit market, including education, foundations, health and human services, religion, arts and cultural, public and societal benefits, environment and animal welfare and international foreign affairs.

We derive revenue from selling perpetual licenses or charging for the use of our software products in a hosted environment and providing a broad offering of services, including consulting, training, installation and implementation, as well as ongoing customer support and maintenance. Consulting, training and implementation are generally not essential to the functionality of our software products and are sold separately. Furthermore, we derive revenue from providing hosting services, performing donor prospect research engagements, selling lists of potential donors, and providing benchmarking studies and data modeling services.

During 2007 and 2008,Revenue for 2009 increased 2% compared to 2008. The inclusion of Kintera, which we acquired companies that provided us with a strategic opportunityin July 2008, resulted in an increase in revenue of $16.1 million for 2009. Excluding the impact of Kintera, revenue decreased by 3% for 2009 when compared to expand our share2008. When removing the impact of foreign currency translation, revenue increased by 4% when comparing 2009 to 2008. Further, when removing the impact of foreign currency translation and the impact from Kintera, revenue decreased by 2% when comparing 2009 to 2008.

Our selling environment remained challenging during 2009 as difficult and uncertain economic conditions continued to put pressure on the spending of many organizations in the nonprofit industry. Revenues associated with our perpetual license offerings and related services decreased compared to 2008 as a result of these economic conditions and reduced market through the SaaSdemand for these offerings. However, our recurring revenue, which is comprised of maintenance services and subscription offerings, markets,continued to experience growth during 2009. Revenue from maintenance services and through the integration of complimentary products and services to serve the changing needssubscription offerings, which represented approximately 61% of our customers.

Revenue for 2008 was $302.5 million, an 18% increaserevenue on a combined basis, grew 21% in 2009 compared to 2007. The2008. Approximately half of this revenue increasegrowth is attributable to our recent business acquisitionsKintera and revenue growth from sales in subscription offerings and maintenance and consulting services. This growth was offset by a decrease in our license revenue principally driven by the economic slowdown that became increasingly challenging through 2008. Organically, our revenue increased 9% in 2008 compared to 2007; with the strongest revenue growth being in our subscription offerings and maintenance services, both of which are principally comprised of recurring revenue with contracts that generally have a duration of one year. Maintenance revenue continues to grow principally through new maintenance contracts associated with both existing customers and new customers associated with new license arrangements. Our subscription revenueremaining growth is principally attributable to increased demand for internet based offerings.the result of our business increasingly evolving towards product sales on a subscription basis. We believe this trend will continue in the future.

In 2009, we focused on closely managing our operating expenses and achieving our targeted level of profitability. Income from operations of $47.4 million for 20082009 decreased by approximately 9%$1.6 million compared to 2007. The2008. During 2009, the decrease in income from operations is primarily attributable to an increase in stock-basedstock based compensation expense, amortization expense associated with intangible assets from our recent acquisitions and research and development expense for new and existing products and services and a higher operating cost structure associated withto support our recent acquisitions.

We ended 2008 with cash and cash equivalents totaling $16.4 million and outstanding borrowings on our credit facility of $59.0 million. During 2008, we generated $60.3 million in cash flows from our operations, which enabled us to pay $17.5 million in dividends and repurchase $43.7 million of our common stock under our repurchase program.continuing product investment.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

We ended 2009 with cash and cash equivalents totaling $22.8 million and no outstanding borrowings on our credit facility. During 2009, we generated $86.8 million in cash flow from operations out of which we paid $59.0 million on our credit facility and $17.7 million in dividends. Additionally, cash flow from operations allowed us to fund the purchase of $5.5 million of property and equipment, and increase our cash and cash equivalents by $6.4 million.

We expect tothat our operating environment will remain challenging in 2010 as existing and prospective customers continue to face a challenging economic environment,exercise caution in which our customers may exercise greater caution over expenditure decisions. As such, we are not able to adequately assess what the precise impact will be on our end markets. However,Notwithstanding these conditions, we plan to continue to focus on expanding market share, selectively investing in our growth initiatives and strengthening our leadership position. ToAs we have throughout 2009, we will also focus on controlling and, as necessary, reducing the extent our operating results continue to be challenged by a weakened economic environment, we plan to to closely manage our operatingcosts and expenses and use of our cash flow in a manner that will maintain a reasonableoperations to achieve our targeted level of profitability and enhance long-term stockholder value.profitability.

Consolidated statements of operations, percent of revenue

 

  Years ended December 31,     Years ended December 31,    
  2008 2007 2006     2009 2008 2007    

Revenue

        

License fees

  11.9% 14.6% 17.0%  8.2 11.9 14.6%  

Services

  33.3  35.5  32.0     28.4   33.3   35.5     

Maintenance

  35.5  36.8  42.3     37.7   35.5   36.8     

Subscriptions

  16.4  9.9  5.5     23.5   16.4   9.9     

Other revenue

  2.9  3.2  3.2     2.2   2.9   3.2     
       

Total revenue

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0%  100.0 100.0 100.0%  
       

Cost of revenue

        

Cost of license fees

  1.1  1.1  1.2     1.1   1.1   1.1     

Cost of services

  21.1  21.4  17.6     20.0   21.1   21.4     

Cost of maintenance

  6.7  6.7  6.9     6.9   6.7   6.7     

Cost of subscriptions

  6.8  4.0  1.2     9.1   6.8   4.0     

Cost of other revenue

  2.8  2.8  3.0     2.0   2.8   2.8     
       

Total cost of revenue

  38.5  36.0  29.9     39.1   38.5   36.0     
       

Gross profit

  61.5  64.0  70.1     60.9   61.5   64.0     

Operating expenses

        

Sales and marketing

  21.5  22.2  21.6     20.3   21.5   22.2     

Research and development

  12.8  11.1  12.1     14.8   12.8   11.1     

General and administrative

  11.3  10.2  11.4     10.8   11.3   10.2     

Amortization

  0.2  0.2  0.4     0.2   0.2   0.2     
       

Total operating expenses

  45.8  43.6  45.4     46.1   45.8   43.6     
       

Income from operations

  15.7  20.4  24.6     14.8   15.7   20.4     

Interest income

  0.2  0.3  0.8     0.2   0.2   0.3     

Interest expense

  (0.5) (0.5) (0.0)    (0.3 (0.5 (0.5)       

Other expense, net

  (0.1) (0.2) (0.1)  

Other income (expense), net

  0.1   (0.1 (0.2)       
    

Income before provision for income taxes

  15.3  20.1  25.3     14.8   15.3   20.1     

Income tax provision

  5.4  7.7  9.5     5.6   5.4   7.7     
       

Net income

  9.9% 12.3% 15.8%  9.2 9.9 12.3%  
 

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Results of operations

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

On April 29, 2009, we acquired RLC Customer Centric Technology B.V. (RLC), a privately held limited company based in the Netherlands. The acquisition of RLC provides us with a foundation to expand into the Netherlands and other Western European markets.

During 2008 and 2007, we acquired companies that provided us with a strategic opportunity to expand our share of the nonprofit market with SaaS and subscription offerings, and through the integration of complimentary products and services to serve the changing needs of our customers. Following are the companies we acquired during 2008 and 2007 and their respective acquisition date:

 

Target Software, Inc. and Target Analysis Group, Inc. (together referred to as the Target Companies)—January 16, 2007;

Index to Financial Statements

eTapestry.com, Inc. (referred to as eTapestry)—August 1, 2007; and

 

Kintera, Inc. (referred to as Kintera)—July 8, 2008.

The results of operations of the Target Companies, eTapestry and Kinteraacquired companies are included in our consolidated results of operations from the dates of their respective acquisition as noted above.above, which impacts the comparability of our results of operations when comparing 2009 to 2008 and 2008 to 2007. We have noted in the discussion below, to the extent meaningful, the impact on the comparability of our results of operations due to the inclusion of the acquired companies for only a partial year in the year of acquisition and a full year in the subsequent year.

Revenue

The table below compares revenue from our statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006.2007.

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008  2007  2006   Change % Change   Change  % Change   2009  2008  2007   Change % Change   Change % Change 
                          

License fees

  $35.9  $37.5  $32.5    $(1.6) (4)%   $5.0  15%  $25.4  $35.9  $37.5   $(10.5 (29)%    $(1.6 (4)% 

Services

   100.8   91.4   61.2     9.4  10%    30.2  49%   87.8   100.8   91.4    (13.0 (13)%     9.4   10

Maintenance

   107.3   94.6   80.9     12.7  13%    13.7  17%   116.5   107.3   94.6    9.2   9    12.7   13

Subscriptions

   49.7   25.4   10.6     24.3  96%    14.8  140%   72.9   49.7   25.4    23.2   47    24.3   96

Other

   8.8   8.1   6.2     0.7  9%    1.9  31%   6.7   8.8   8.1    (2.1 (24)%     0.7   9
                                 

Total revenue

  $302.5  $257.0  $191.4    $45.5  18%   $65.6  34%  $309.3  $302.5  $257.0   $6.8   2   $45.5   18
                                 

Total revenue increased $6.8 million, or 2%, in 2009 compared to 2008. The increase in revenue is primarily due to growth in subscription revenue as a result of the acquisition of Kintera and an increase in demand for our hosting services and online data services. The growth in revenue from our subscription offerings is also a result of the ongoing evolution of our product offerings from license-based to subscription-based offerings. Maintenance revenue also increased due to additional revenue from new maintenance contracts associated with new license agreements and existing client increases. The increase in subscriptions and maintenance revenue was partially offset by decreases in license fees and services revenue. The decreases in license fees and services revenue are principally attributable to the delays and postponements of purchasing decisions by our existing and prospective customers resulting from the weak economic environment.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Total revenue increased $45.5 million, or 18%, in 2008 compared to 2007. Approximately half, or $22.0 million, of the increase in total revenue was attributable to the inclusion of eTapestry and Kintera in our consolidated results of operations. The remaining increase in revenue for 2008, totaling $23.5 million and representing a 9% increase over 2007, was primarily attributable to growth in revenue from subscriptions and maintenance services. The increase in maintenance revenue is principally from new maintenance contracts with both existing customers and new customers associated with new license agreements.agreements and existing client increases. Subscription revenue increased 35%, excluding the impact of our acquisitions, due to an increase in demand for internet based softwareour hosting and other online data services.

Total revenue increased $65.6 million, or 34%, in 2007 compared to 2006. A total of $28.3 million, or 43%, of this increase was attributable to the inclusion of the Target and eTapestry in our consolidated results of operations. The remaining increase in revenue in 2007, totaling $37.3 million and representing a 19.5% increase over 2006 revenue, is due to growth in services and license fees to new and existing customers, partially due to the introduction of new product offerings. Also contributing to the growth is revenue from new maintenance contracts associated with these new license agreements and existing client increases and revenue from our subscriptions.

Segment results

We analyzeThrough December 31, 2009, we analyzed our business according to our six operating segments as identified in Note 14 of our consolidated financial statements, which are license fees, consulting and education services, analytic services, maintenance, subscriptions and other. The analyses provided below are presented on a non-GAAP basis before the inclusion of various allocable corporate costs such as depreciation, facilities and information technology or IT,(IT) support costs, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangibles arising from business combinations because, in managing our operations, we believe that the exclusion of these costs allows us to better understand and manage our operating expenses and cash needs. These excluded costs are analyzed separately following the segment results analysis.

Index to Financial Statements

License fees

 

  Years ended
December 31,
   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006   Change % Change   Change  % Change       2009 2008 2007   Change % Change   Change % Change 
                           

License fee revenue

  $35.9  $37.5  $32.5    $(1.6) (4)%   $5.0  15%  $25.4   $35.9   $37.5     $(10.5 (29)%    $(1.6 (4)% 

Direct controllable cost of license fees

   3.1   2.7   2.3     0.4  15%    0.4  17%   3.2    3.1    2.7      0.1   3    0.4   15
                                  

Segment income

  $32.8  $34.8  $30.2    $(2.0) (6)%   $4.6  15%  $22.2   $32.8   $34.8     $(10.6 (32)%    $(2.0 (6)% 
                                  

Segment margin %

   91%  93%  93%            87  91  93        

Revenue from license fees is derived from the sale of our software products, under a perpetual license agreement. The decrease in license fee revenue during 2009 when compared to 2008 and during 2008 when compared to 2007 is principally attributable to longer sales cycle times, increased scrutiny ondelays and postponement of purchasing decisions and overall cautiousness takencaution exercised by existing and prospective customers as a result of continued challenges posed by the weak economic challenges.environment. In addition, we are increasingly experiencing a shift in our customers’ buying preference away from perpetual license agreements towards subscription-based hosted applications.

During 2009, license fee revenue decreased by $10.5 million when compared to 2008. Sales from license fees to new customers decreased $4.2 million and sales to existing clients decreased by $6.3 million. Additionally, during 2009, revenue related to our Enterprise CRM offering grew by $3.7 million, which was offset by decreases in our other perpetual license product offerings of $14.2 million.

During 2008, revenuesales from license fees to new customers decreased by $2.9 million when compared to 2007, offset by an increase to existing customers of $1.3 million.

License fee revenue growth in 2007 is comprised of an increase due to product price increases of approximately $1.2 million and an increase due to volume and mix of products sold of $3.8 million. Additionally, the increase in license fee revenue is attributable to a $1.7 million increase in sales to existing clients and a $3.0 million increase in sales to new clients. The Target Companies contributed $0.4 million of license fee revenue in 2007.

Direct controllable cost of license fees is principally comprised of third-party software royalties and variable reseller commissions. The increase in cost of license fees for 2009 when compared to 2008 and 2008 when compared to 2007 is primarily attributable to a shift in the mix of license fee revenue toward products with higher third-party software royalty costs.

The increase in cost

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of license fees in 2007 is comprisedfinancial condition and results of a $0.3 million increase in third party royalty payments associated with The Patron Edge, our ticketing software, and a $0.3 million increase in proprietary software costs, offset by a $0.2 million decrease due to reduced reseller commissions as a result of the discontinued use of that sales channel.operations—(Continued)

Consulting and education services

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006   Change % Change   Change  % Change         2009 2008 2007   Change % Change   Change % Change 
                           

Consulting and education services revenue

  $77.7  $73.2  $53.7    $4.5  6%   $19.5  36%  $65.3   $77.7   $73.2     $(12.4 (16)%    $4.5   6

Direct controllable cost of consulting and education services

   44.4   38.8   26.0     5.6  14%    12.8  49%   41.8    44.4    38.8      (2.6 (6)%     5.6   14
                                  

Segment income

  $33.3  $34.4  $27.7    $(1.1) (3)%   $6.7  24%  $23.5   $33.3   $34.4     $(9.8 (29)%    $(1.1 (3)% 
                                  

Segment margin %

   43%  47%  52%            36  43  47        

Consulting and education services revenue consists of consulting, installation, implementation and education services. Consulting, installation and implementation services involve converting data from a customer’s existing system, assistance in file set up and system configuration, and/or process re-engineering. Education services involve customer training activities.

During 2009, consulting and education services revenue decreased $12.4 million when compared to 2008. The inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008 accounted for $0.6 million of an increase in consulting and education services revenue. Included in consulting and education services revenue in 2009 is $0.7 million of revenue attributable to RLC. The decrease in revenue is principally the result of decreased volume of consulting, installation and implementation services delivered for our core software products and decreased demand for training services as existing and prospective customers continue to experience budgetary constraints associated with the challenges posed by the overall economic environment. To a lesser extent, the decrease in revenue is attributable to a reduction in the rates we charge as a result of a higher level of discounts offered on our service offerings during 2009 compared to 2008. During 2009, these decreases of $17.0 million were partially offset by an increase of $4.6 million in consulting services associated with our Enterprise CRM product offering and our internet-based products.

During 2008, consulting and education services revenue increased by $4.5 million including $0.5when compared to 2007, of which $1.9 million of revenueis attributable to the inclusion of Kintera. The inclusion of eTapestry for a full year in 2008 compared to five months in 2007 accounted for $1.4 million of the consultingKintera and education services revenue growth for 2008.eTapestry. The rates charged for our service offerings have remained relatively constant year over year and, as such, the increase in revenue in 2008 is principally the result of increased volume of services provided. The increase in volume of services provided is principally due to an increase in the demand in consulting services associated with our new eCRMEnterprise CRM product offerings and our internet based products.

Index to Financial Statements

The rates charged for our service offerings in 2007 remained relatively constant year over year and, as such, the increase in revenue in 2007 is principally the result of increased volume of services provided. The increase in consulting, installation and implementation service revenue of $15.2 million includes $5.3 million attributable to the Target Companies and $0.3 million attributable to eTapestry. Additionally, education services delivered increased $4.3 million or 25%. Of this increase, $2.9 million is attributable to Training Pass, our fixed-rate program that permits customers to attend unlimited training over a specified contract period, which is typically one year.

Cost of consulting and education services is principally comprised of human resource costs, third-party contractor expenses, classroom rentals and other costs incurred in providing consulting, installation and implementation services and customer training.

During 2009, cost of consulting and education services decreased by $2.6 million. Human resource costs related to additional headcount attributable to Kintera and RLC increased cost of consulting and education services by $2.4 million. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, the remaining decrease in cost of consulting and education services of $5.0 million during 2009 is primarily due to a reduction in travel-related expenses, recruiting and other costs.

During 2008, cost of consulting and education services increased by $5.6 million, of which $2.2 million is attributable to the inclusion of human resource costs associated with Kintera and eTapestry. TheExcluding the impact of acquisitions, the remaining increase of $3.4 million is primarily attributable to human resource cost increases as a result of increased skills and competencies in our service professionals.

During 2007, human

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

The decrease in segment margin from 2008 to 2009 is principally due to the decrease in demand for consulting and education services while the cost of consulting and education services decreased to a lesser extent. Cost of consulting and education services decreased at a lower rate than the associated revenue principally due to maintaining resource costs increased $11.3 million, or a 55% increase, compared to 2006 as we increased headcount to meet growing customer demand. A total of $2.2 million or 19% ofcapacity for the increase in human resource costs is due to the inclusion of headcountservices associated with our Enterprise CRM product offerings and the Target Companies and an additional $0.2 million fromexpected increase in services when the inclusion of the headcount associated with eTapestry. Additionally, travel-related expenses and training materials increased $1.4 million.economic environment improves.

The continued decrease in segment margin from 2007 to 2008 is primarily attributable to average billing rates for our consultants remaining relatively constant while consultant’s salaries and related human resource costs have increased, and a change in the mix of the consulting and education services provided.

The segment margin decreased sequentially from 2006 to 2007 due to increased human resource costs and lower utilization as a result of scheduling challenges of matching client demands with consultants’ availability and appropriate skill set.

Analytic services

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006   Change  % Change   Change  % Change         2009 2008 2007   Change % Change   Change  % Change 
                           

Analytic services revenue

  $23.1  $18.2  $7.5    $4.9  27%   $10.7  143%  $22.5   $23.1   $18.2     $(0.6 (3)%    $4.9  27

Direct controllable cost of analytic services

   9.8   8.0   3.6     1.8  23%    4.4  122%   10.0    9.8    8.0      0.2   2    1.8  23
                                  

Segment income

  $13.3  $10.2  $3.9    $3.1  30%   $6.3  162%  $12.5   $13.3   $10.2     $(0.8 (6)%    $3.1  30
                                  

Segment margin %

   58%  56%  52%             56  58  56         

Analytic services which are comprised of donor prospect research, selling lists of potential donors, benchmarking studies and data modeling services. These services involve the assessment of current and prospective donor information of the customer. These assessmentsnonprofit organizations and are performed using our proprietary analytical tools. The end product enables the customerorganizations to more effectively target its fundraising activities.

During 2009, analytic services revenue decreased by $0.6 million when compared to 2008. The inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008 accounted for $0.8 million of an increase in analytic services revenue. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Kintera, analytic services revenue decreased $1.4 million in 2009 when compared to 2008. The rates charged for our analytic services have remained relatively constant year over year and, as such, the remaining decrease in analytic services revenue is principally the result of the decreased volume of services provided.

Revenue from analytic services increased $4.9 million or 27%, in 2008 when compared to 2007. The rates charged for our analytic services have remained relatively constant year over year and, as such, the increase in revenue is principally the result of increased volume of services provided.

Revenue from analytic services increased 143% in 2007 compared to 2006. Approximately $8.6 million of the increase in analytic services is attributable to the inclusion of the Target Companies. The remaining increase in revenue is due to an increase in services delivered.

Index to Financial Statements

Cost of analytic services is primarily comprised of human resource costs and data expense incurred to perform analytic services. ToThe increase in cost of analytic services for 2009 when compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to $0.8 million of human resource and other costs attributable to the inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Kintera, cost of analytic services for 2009 decreased by $0.6 million primarily due to a decrease in data expense.

During 2008, cost of analytic services increased when compared to 2007. The increase is attributable to additional human resources costs due to an increase in headcount. Headcount increased when comparing 2008 to 2007 to meet the increase in customer demand for our analytic services, we have increased our headcount when comparing 2008 to 2007. As a result, the increasesservices.

The decrease in cost of analytic services are attributable to human resources costs.

The increasemargin in cost of analytic services in 20072009 when compared to 20062008 is principallyprimarily due the inclusion of headcountto additional costs associated with the Target Companies. Human resource costs increased $3.8 million in 2007 comparedacquisition of Kintera.

Index to 2006,Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of which $3.2 million is directly related to the Target Companies. Additionally, data expense incurred to deliver analytic services increased $0.4 million,financial condition and results of which $0.2 million is directly associated with revenue from the Target Companies.operations—(Continued)

The analytic services margin increase in 2008 and 2007when compared to 2007 and 2006 is attributable to including and integrating the analytic services segment of the Target Companies, which has a different cost structure and a higher margin than the historical Blackbaud onlyBlackbaud-only analytic services segment.

Maintenance

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006   Change  % Change   Change  % Change   2009 2008 2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change 
                           

Maintenance revenue

  $107.3  $94.6  $80.9    $12.7  13%   $13.7  17%  $116.5   $107.3   $94.6     $9.2  9   $12.7  13

Direct controllable cost of maintenance

   15.3   13.4   10.8     1.9  14%    2.6  24%   15.8    15.3    13.4      0.5  3    1.9  14
                                  

Segment income

  $92.0  $81.2  $70.1    $10.8  13%   $11.1  16%  $100.7   $92.0   $81.2     $8.7  9   $10.8  13
                                  

Segment margin %

   86%  86%  87%             86  86  86          

Revenue from maintenance is comprised of annual fees derived from maintenance contracts associated with new software licenses and annual renewals of existing maintenance contracts. These contracts provide customers with updates, enhancements and upgrades to our software products and online, telephone and email support.

During 2009, maintenance revenue increased $9.2 million when compared to 2008. The inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008 accounted for $2.8 million of the increase in maintenance revenue. Included in maintenance revenue in 2009 is $0.6 million of revenue attributable to RLC. Excluding the impact of the acquisitions of Kintera and RLC, maintenance revenue increased $5.8 million in 2009 when compared to 2008. The increase is principally comprised of $7.3 million of maintenance with new customers associated with new license agreements and increases in contracts with existing customers and $4.0 million from maintenance contract inflationary rate adjustments, offset by $5.5 million from maintenance contracts that were not renewed.

During 2008, the increase in maintenance revenue for 2008 includes $2.8 million of revenues generated byrevenue attributable to Kintera. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Kintera, maintenance revenue increased $9.9 million in 2008 when compared to 2007. The remaining increase of $9.9 million is principally comprised of $11.0 million of new maintenance contracts with both existing customers and new customers associated with new license agreements offset by $3.9 million of maintenanceand increases in contracts that were not renewed. Additionally, maintenance revenue increasedwith existing customers and $2.8 million from maintenance contract inflationary rate adjustments.

The increase in maintenance revenue in 2007 compared to 2006 is comprised of $12.6 million of new maintenance contracts associated with new license agreements, including new products, $2.5 million from maintenance agreements associated with customers of the Target Companies and $2.3 million from maintenance contract inflationary rate adjustments, offset by $3.9 million of maintenance contracts that were not renewed.

Direct controllable cost of maintenance is primarily comprised of human resource costs, third-party contractor expenses, third-party royalty costs and data expenses, and other costs incurred in providing support and services to our customers. During 2008, the increasesThe increase in cost of maintenance arein 2009 when compared to 2008 is the result of an increase in human resources costs primarily attributable to headcount associated with Kintera.

During 2008, the increase in cost of maintenance is principally the result of increases in human resources costs. The increase in human resource costs includes $0.2 million of costs attributable to additional headcount for Kintera. Additionally, third-party royalty costs increased by $0.4 million, primarily related to our ticketing solution The Patron’s Edge.

During 2007 the cost ofThe maintenance increase is principally the result of a $2.5 million increase in salary, benefitssegment margin remained unchanged during 2009, 2008 and bonus expense, of which $0.7 million is due the inclusion of headcount associated with the acquisition of the Target Companies. Increases from third-party royalty costs contributed an additional $0.1 million.2007.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Subscriptions

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006    Change  % Change    Change  % Change         2009 2008 2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change 
             

Subscriptions revenue

  $49.7  $25.4  $10.6    $24.3  96%   $14.8  140%  $72.9   $49.7   $25.4     $23.2  47   $24.3  96

Direct controllable cost of subscriptions

   15.7   7.8   2.1     7.9  101%    5.7  271%   22.3    15.7    7.8      6.6  42    7.9  101
                                  

Segment income

  $34.0  $17.6  $8.5    $16.4  93%   $9.1  107%  $50.6   $34.0   $17.6     $16.6  49   $16.4  93
                                  

Segment margin %

   68%  69%  80%             69  68  69          

Revenue from subscriptions is principally comprised of revenue from providing access to hosted applications providing applicationand hosting services, and access to certain data services and our online subscription training offerings. In general, we are experiencing growth in our hosted applications business as a result of the eTapestry and Kintera acquisitions, which addadded experience in on-demand solutions and expandsexpanded our set of subscription services. ApproximatelyAdditionally, the growth in revenue in our subscription offerings is the result of the ongoing evolution of our product offerings from license-based to subscription-based offerings.

Subscriptions revenue increased $23.2 million during 2009 when compared to 2008. The inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008 accounted for $11.7 million of the increase in subscriptions revenue. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Kintera, growth in subscriptions revenue is primarily due to the continued increase in demand for hosted applications, hosting services and other online data services and we are experiencing a shift in our customers’ buying preference away from perpetual license agreements towards subscription-based hosted applications.

Subscriptions revenue increased $24.3 million during 2008 when compared to 2007. During 2008, included in subscription revenue is $11.3 million or 44%, of the revenue growth for 2008 is attributable to the inclusion of Kintera. The inclusion of eTapestry for a full year in 2008 compared to five monthsa partial year in 2007 accounted for $5.1 million or 20%, of the subscription revenue growth for 2008.increase in subscriptions revenue. The remaining $7.9 million increase is attributable to organic growth from increased demand for hosting services and other online data services.

The increase in subscriptions revenue in 2007 compared to 2006 is principally due to a $10.7 million increase in revenue from providing access to our hosted applications, of which $7.4 million is attributable to the Target Companies and $2.7 million is attributable to eTapestry. Additionally, revenue from application hosting services increased $1.7 million and revenue from our online analytics products increased $2.4 million.

Direct controllable cost of subscriptions is primarily comprised of human resource costs, third-party royalty and data expenses, hosting expenses, and other costs incurred in providing support and services to our customers. During 2009, cost of subscriptions increased by $6.6 million when compared to 2008. Additional headcount and increases in data expense, hosting and other costs attributable to Kintera represented $4.0 million of the increase in cost of subscriptions. Excluding the impact of the acquisition of Kintera, cost of subscriptions increased by $2.6 million in 2009 when compared to 2008. The remaining increase is principally due to an increase in data expense, hosting and human resource costs.

The increase in the cost of subscriptions in 2008 when compared to 2007 is principally due to an increase in data expense, hosting and other costs of $5.1 million, of which $2.1 million is attributable to the inclusion of Kintera. Additionally, human resource costs increased $2.8 million, of which $1.5 million is dueattributable to the inclusion of Kintera and eTapestry.

The increase in the cost of subscriptions in 2007 compared to 2006 is primarily due to an increase in human resource costs of $4.9 million, of which $3.9 million and $0.4 million is due to the inclusion of headcount associated with the acquisitions of the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. Additionally, data expense increased $0.4 million and travel-related and other costs increased an additional $0.4 million.

Subscriptions segment margin decreased slightly from 2007remained substantially unchanged during 2009, 2008 and 2007.

Index to 2008 principally due to the inclusionFinancial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of Kintera. The decrease in subscriptions margin in 2007 compared to 2006 is predominantly due to higher human resource costs as a resultfinancial condition and results of the inclusion of costs related to the Target Companies.operations—(Continued)

Other revenue

 

   Years ended December 31,     2008 versus 2007     2007 versus 2006 
(in millions)        2008  2007  2006     Change  % Change     Change  % Change 

Other revenue

  $8.8  $8.1  $6.2    $0.7  9%   $1.9  31%

Direct controllable cost of other revenue

   8.3   7.2   5.7     1.1  15%    1.5  26%
                 

Segment income

  $0.5  $0.9  $0.5    $(0.4) (44)%   $0.4  80%
                 

Segment margin %

   6%  11%  8%         

Index to Financial Statements
   Years ended December 31,     2009 versus 2008     2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)            2009  2008  2007     Change  % Change     Change  % Change 
              

Other revenue

  $6.7   $8.8   $8.1     $(2.1 (24)%    $0.7   9

Direct controllable cost of other revenue

   6.0    8.3    7.2      (2.3 (28)%     1.1   15
                 

Segment income

  $0.7   $0.5   $0.9     $0.2   40   $(0.4 (44)% 
                 

Segment margin %

   10  6  11        

Other revenue includes the sale of business forms that are used in conjunction with our software products; reimbursement of travel-related expenses, primarily incurred in connection with the performance of services at customer locations; fees from user conferences; and sale of hardware in conjunction with The Patron Edge.

Other revenue decreased in 2009 when compared to 2008 primarily due to (i) a decrease in reimbursable travel-related costs from our services businesses as a result of reduced service engagements and (ii) a decrease in fees from user conferences as a result of fewer participants, both of which are attributable to the challenging economic environment. The increase in 2008 other revenue of $0.7 million asin 2008 when compared to 2007 is primarily to attributable increases in reimbursable travel and related expenses.

Other revenue increased in 2007 primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in reimbursable travel-related costs from our services businesses. Additionally, revenue from user conferences increased $0.4 million, of which $0.3 million is attributable to the Target Companies.

Direct controllable cost of other revenue includes human resource costs, costs of business forms, costs of user conferences and reimbursable expenses relating to the performance of services at customer locations.

The decrease in the cost of other revenue in 2009 when compared to 2008 is due to a decrease in reimbursable expenses related to providing services at customer locations and a decrease in the costs of user conferences. The increase in the cost of other revenue in 2008 when compared to 2007 is due to an increase in reimbursable travel expenses related to providing services at customer locations and costs associated with user conferences. Reimbursable expenses related to providing services at customer locations increased in 2008 compared to 2007 by $0.5 million and conference costs increased $0.6 million.

The increase in 2007 compared

Index to 2006 is due to a $1.3 million increase in reimbursable expenses related to providing services at clients’ sitesFinancial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and a $0.2 million increase in costs associated with our user conferences.analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

U.S. GAAP gross profit

Segment income does not include an allocation of corporate costs, stock-based compensation expense and amortization expense. The following schedule reconciles total segment income to gross profit as stated on the statement of operations.operations:

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008 2007 2006   Change % Change   Change  % Change   2009 2008 2007   Change % Change   Change % Change 
                           

License fees

  $32.8  $34.8  $30.2    $(2.0) (6)%   $4.6  15%  $22.2   $32.8   $34.8     $(10.6 (32)%    $(2.0 (6)% 

Consulting and education services

   33.3   34.4   27.7     (1.1) (3)%    6.7  24%   23.5    33.3    34.4      (9.8 (29)%     (1.1 (3)% 

Analytic services

   13.3   10.2   3.9     3.1  30 %    6.3  162%   12.5    13.3    10.2      (0.8 (6)%     3.1   30 % 

Maintenance

   92.0   81.2   70.1     10.8  13 %    11.1  16%   100.7    92.0    81.2      8.7   9 %     10.8   13 % 

Subscriptions

   34.0   17.6   8.5     16.4  93 %    9.1  107%   50.6    34.0    17.6      16.6   49 %     16.4   93 % 

Other

   0.5   0.9   0.5     (0.4) (44)%    0.4  80%   0.7    0.5    0.9      0.2   40 %     (0.4 (44)% 
                                      

Total segment income

  $205.9  $179.1  $140.9    $26.8  15 %   $38.2  27%  $210.2   $205.9   $179.1     $4.3   2 %    $26.8   15 % 
                                      

Less corporate costs not allocated to segment expenses:

                         

Stock-based compensation

   2.3   1.1   0.7     1.2  109 %    0.4  57%   2.6    2.3    1.1      0.3   13 %     1.2   109 % 

Amortization of intangible assets acquired in business combinations

   5.3   2.9   —       2.4  83 %    2.9  —  %   6.3    5.3    2.9      1.0   19 %     2.4   83 % 

Corporate overhead costs

   12.2   10.5   6.1     1.7  16 %    4.4  72%   12.9    12.2    10.5      0.7   6 %     1.7   16 % 
                                      

Gross profit as stated in statements of operations

  $186.1  $164.6  $134.1    $21.5  13 %   $30.5  23%  $188.4   $186.1   $164.6     $2.3   1 %    $21.5   13 % 
                                      

Gross margin %

   62%  64%  70%            61  62  64        

Stock-based compensation expense and amortization expense are analyzed separately following the operating expenses section.

Index to Financial Statements

Corporate overhead costs

Allocated corporate overhead costs are comprised of depreciation, facilities and IT support costs. Corporate overhead costs included in gross profit were $12.9 million, $12.2 million and $10.5 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in corporate overhead costs allocated to cost of revenue in 2009 when compared to 2008 is primarily attributable to the increase in depreciation expense of $0.3 million as a result of property and equipment purchases and $0.4 million of increased IT support costs.

The increase in corporate overhead costs in 2008 when compared to 2007 is primarily the result of an increase in depreciation of $0.7 million as a result of property and equipment purchases. Additionally, facilities expense increased $1.7 million primarily from the additionalas a result of locations added in connection with the Kintera and eTapestry acquisitions and additional office space leased. IT support costs decreased $0.7 million due to reduced maintenance cost on internally used software.

Of the $4.4 million increase in 2007, $1.9 million and $0.2 million are attributable the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. Overhead costs increased due to the lease of two additional office facilities. Facilities expense increased $0.8 million as the result of leasing additional office space, a sublease expiring and a decrease in the South Carolina state incentive, which is accounted for as a reduction to rent, and a $0.2 million increase in communications expense. IT support costs increased $0.7 million, of which $0.3 million is human resource costs and $0.4 million is maintenance cost on internally used software. Additionally, depreciation expense increased $0.4 million.

Operating expenses

The operating expenses analyzed below are presented on a non-U.S. GAAP basis as they exclude stock-based compensation expense. We believe that the exclusion of these costs allows us to better understand and manage other operating expenses and cash needs. Stock-based compensation expense is analyzed, in total, in the section following the operating expense analysis.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Sales and marketing

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007
(in millions)  2008  2007  2006   Change  % Change   Change  % Change   2009  2008  2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change
                        

Sales and marketing expense excluding stock-based compensation

  $63.6  $56.2  $40.6    $7.4  13%    $15.6  38%   $61.2  $63.6  $56.2   $(2.4)  (4)%   $7.4  13%

Add: Stock-based compensation expense

   1.6   0.8   0.8     0.8  100%     —    0%    1.6   1.6   0.8    —    0 %    0.8  100%
                               

Sales and marketing expense

  $65.2  $57.0  $41.4    $8.2  14%    $15.6  38%   $62.8  $65.2  $57.0   $(2.4)  (4)%   $8.2  14%
                               

% of revenue (excluding stock-based compensation)

   21%   22%   21%              20%   21%   22%          

Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and related human resource costs, travel-related expenses, sales commissions, advertising and marketing materials, public relations and an allocation of depreciation, facilities and IT support costs.

During 2009, sales and marketing expense decreased $2.4 million when compared to 2008. The inclusion of human resource and other costs attributable to Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008 accounted for $2.8 million of an increase in sales and marketing expense. Excluding the sales and marketing expense increase attributable to Kintera, sales and marketing expense decreased $5.2 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to a reduction in travel-related expenses, corporate allocated costs and other sales and marketing related costs of $2.1 million. Additionally, commission expense decreased by $2.4 million due to lower commissionable revenue and human resource costs decreased by $0.7 million due to a reduction in headcount.

The increase in sales and marketing expense in 2008 compared to 2007 is principally due to increases in our sales force and the inclusion of sales and marketing costs of acquired companies. During 2008, human resource costs increased $5.9 million, of which $3.2 million is due to the inclusion of human resources associated with the acquisitions of Kintera and eTapestry. Other increases include higher travel costs, allocated costs and other marketing related costs of $1.5 million.

As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expense in 2009 decreased when compared to 2008 principally due to the decrease in commission expense resulting from lower commissionable revenue during 2009. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing costs in 2008 decreased by one percentage point compared with 2007, principally due to a decrease in commission expense associated with the decline in license fees and lower growth rate of our services.

The increase in sales and marketing expense in 2007 compared to 2006 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue is principally due to the increase in the size of our sales force by approximately 27%. During 2007, human resource costs increased $8.2 million, of which $3.1 million and $0.9 million is due to the inclusion of headcount associated with the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. Additionally, commissions increased $3.7 million due to higher commissionable sales. Other increases include higher allocated costs of $1.6 million, higher travel-related expenses of $1.3 million and higher marketing expenses of $0.7 million.

Index to Financial Statements

Research and development

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007
(in millions)       2008 2007 2006   Change  % Change   Change  % Change   2009 2008 2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change
                         

Research and development expense excluding stock-based compensation

  $36.3  $27.3  $22.4    $9.0  33%   $4.9  22%  $42.7   $36.3   $27.3     $6.4  18%   $9.0  33%

Add: Stock-based compensation expense

   2.4   1.2   0.7     1.2  100%    0.5  71%   2.9    2.4    1.2      0.5  21%    1.2  100%
                                

Research and development expense

  $38.7  $28.5  $23.1    $10.2  36%   $5.4  23%  $45.6   $38.7   $28.5     $6.9  18%   $10.2  36%
                                

% of revenue (excluding stock-based compensation)

   12%  11%  12%             14  12  11          

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Research and development expenses include human resource costs, third-party contractor expenses, software development tools and other expenses related to developing new products, upgrading and enhancing existing products and an allocation of depreciation, facilities and IT support costs.

Research and development costs increased in 2009 when compared to 2008 principally due to an increase in headcount associated with increased investment in our products. During 2009, the increase in research and development costs is principally the result of an increase in human resource costs of $5.8 million, $3.2 million of which is attributable to inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008. Further increases of $0.6 million are attributable to higher allocated costs, partially offset by decreased travel and recruiting costs.

During 2008 when compared to 2007, the increase in research and development costs is primarily due to a $7.6 million increase in human resource costs resulting from an increase in headcount and increased investment in our products, of which $3.4 million is due to the inclusion of Kintera and eTapestry. Further increases of $1.1 million are attributable to higher allocated costs and $0.3 million higher travel and other costs.

Research and development expense as a percentage of revenue increased one percentage point in 2009 when compared to 2008 and 2008 when compared to 2007 primarily due to an increased investment in our product initiatives.

During 2007, the increase in absolute dollars in research and development costs is primarily due to a $4.9 million increase in human resource costs of which $1.0 million and $0.5 million are due to the inclusion of headcount associated with the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. We discontinued the use of offshore contractors during the fourth quarter of 2006 resulting in the need for additional staffing for the development of new product offerings. A further increase of $1.0 million is attributable to higher allocated costs. These increases were offset by a $1.0 million decrease in outside contractor expenses as a result of the discontinued use of offshore contractors. Research and development as a percentage of revenue decreased one percentage point in 2007 compared with 2006 principally because during 2007, we grew our investment more slowly as we reevaluated our product development plans in light of the combination with the Target Companies and eTapestry.

General and administrative

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007
(in millions)       2008 2007 2006   Change  % Change   Change % Change         2009 2008 2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change
                         

General and administrative expense excluding stock-based compensation

  $28.3  $22.4  $16.6    $5.9  26%   $5.8  35%  $28.2   $28.3   $22.4     $(0.1)  (0)%   $5.9  26%

Add: Stock-based compensation expense

   5.8   3.8   5.2     2.0  53%    (1.4) (27)%   5.2    5.8    3.8      (0.6)  (10)%    2.0  53%
                                

General and administrative expense

  $34.1  $26.2  $21.8    $7.9  30%   $4.4  20%  $33.4   $34.1   $26.2     $(0.7)  (2)%   $7.9  30%
                                

% of revenue (excluding stock-based compensation)

   9%  9%  9%            9  9  9          

General and administrative expense consists primarily of human resource costs for general corporate functions, including finance, accounting, legal, human resources, corporate development, third-party professional fees, insurance, an allocation of depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, and other administrative expenses.

During 2009, the decrease in general and administrative expense when compared to 2008 was primarily the result of closely managing our operating costs during 2009. Included in general and administrative expense during 2009 is an increase of $1.8 million in human resource costs and $0.3 million of other costs attributable to the inclusion of Kintera for a full year in 2009 compared to a partial year in 2008. Excluding these costs attributable to Kintera, general and administrative expense decreased by $2.2 million in 2009 when compared to 2008 primarily due to decreased travel-related costs, bad debt expense and professional fees.

During 2008, the increase in general and administrative expenses increased $5.9 millionwhen compared to 2007 of whichincludes $3.7 million isof additional human resource and other costs attributed to the inclusion of Kintera and eTapestry. The remaining increase was primarily driven by an increase in human resource costs of $1.2 million due to an increase in headcount and $1.0 million increase in bad debt expense and allocated costs.

As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative costs remained unchanged during 2009, 2008 and 2007.

Index to Financial Statements

During 2007, generalBlackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and administrative expenses increased $5.8 million compared to 2006;analysis of this amount, $2.7 millionfinancial condition and $0.4 million are attributable to the inclusionresults of the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. This $5.8 million increase was primarily driven by a $3.3 million increase in human resource costs associated with additional headcount, of which $1.1 million and $0.2 million are due to the inclusion of the Target Companies and eTapestry, respectively. Other increases include higher travel-related expenses, third-party professional fees, allocated costs, insurance, recruiting and relocation expenses, bad debt expense and other costs of $2.4 million.operations—(Continued)

Stock-based compensation

Beginning on January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), using the modified prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123(R) requires us toWe recognize compensation expense related to stock-based awards granted to employees. Stock-basedWe measure stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognizedrecognize it as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.

Our consolidated statements of operations for 2009, 2008, 2007 and 20062007 include the amounts of stock-based compensation illustrated below:

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007
(in millions)  2008  2007  2006   Change  % Change   Change % Change           2009  2008  2007   Change  % Change   Change  % Change
                        

Included in cost of revenue:

                               

Cost of services

  $1.5  $0.6  $0.5    $0.9  150%   $0.1  20%  $1.4  $1.4  $0.6   $—    0%   $0.8  133%

Cost of maintenance

   0.5   0.2   0.1     0.3  150%    0.1  100%   0.8   0.6   0.2    0.2  33%    0.4  200%

Cost of subscriptions

   0.3   0.3   0.1     —    —  %    0.2  200%   0.4   0.3   0.3    0.1  33%    —    0%
                               

Total included in cost of revenue

   2.3   1.1   0.7     1.2  109%    0.4  57%   2.6   2.3   1.1    0.3  13%    1.2  109%

Included in operating expenses:

                               

Sales and marketing

   1.6   0.8   0.8     0.8  100%    —    —  %   1.6   1.6   0.8    —    0%    0.8  100%

Research and development

   2.4   1.2   0.7     1.2  100%    0.5  71%   2.9   2.4   1.2    0.5  21%    1.2  100%

General and administrative

   5.8   3.8   5.2     2.0  53%    (1.4) (27)%   5.2   5.8   3.8    (0.6)  (10)%    2.0  53%
                               

Total included in operating expenses

   9.8   5.8   6.7     4.0  69%    (0.9) (13)%   9.7   9.8   5.8    (0.1)  (1)%    4.0  69%
                               

Total

  $12.1  $6.9  $7.4    $5.2  75%   $(0.5) (7)%  $12.3  $12.1  $6.9   $0.2  2%   $5.2  75%
                               

Stock-based compensation is comprised of expense from common stock awards, stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. The table below summarizes the stock-based compensation by award type for 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006   Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008  2007  2006   Change % Change   Change % Change         2009  2008  2007   Change % Change   Change % Change 
                          

Stock-based compensation from:

                            

Common stock

  $1.4  $—    $—      $1.4  —  %   $—    —  %  $0.8  $1.4  $—     $(0.6 (43)%    $1.4   —  

Stock options

   1.5   2.4   5.5     (0.9) (38)%   $(3.1) (56)%   0.3   1.5   2.4    (1.2 (80)%    $(0.9 (38)% 

Restricted stock awards

   7.2   3.8   1.8     3.4  89%   $2.0  111%   8.8   7.2   3.8    1.6   22   $3.4   89

Stock appreciation rights

   2.0   0.7   0.1     1.3  186%   $0.6  600%   2.4   2.0   0.7    0.4   20   $1.3   186
                                 

Total stock-based compensation

  $12.1  $6.9  $7.4    $5.2  75%   $(0.5) (7)%  $12.3  $12.1  $6.9   $0.2   2   $5.2   75
                                 

During 2009 and 2008, we expensed $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, related to compensation and incentive arrangements payable in common stock that areand associated with the acquisition of Kinterabusiness acquisitions completed in 2008 and eTapestry.2007. There were no similar arrangements payable in common stock in 2007 and 2006.2007. The decrease in compensation expense from stock options in 2009 compared to 2008 and 2008 compared to 2007 and 2007 compared to 2006 is the result of having not granted stock options since 2005 and using the

Index to Financial Statements

accelerated method for recognizing stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options. This methodoptions, which results in the recognition of more expense in the earlier periods of vesting when compared with the straight-line method. We have not granted stock options since 2005 and all historical awards will be fully vested in 2010.

Stock-based compensation expense from restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights increased in 2009 compared to 2008 and 2008 compared to 2007 and in 2007 compared to 2006 due to the issuance of additional grants and rights in 20082009 and 2007,2008, offset by the partial vesting of grants issued in prior years.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

The total amount of compensation costs related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $ 29.4 million and $26.9$29.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.2009. The compensation cost for unvested awards at December 31, 20082009 will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

Amortization

We allocatedallocate amortization expense to cost of revenue according tobased on the nature of the respective identifiable intangible asset and towhether the extent itasset is directly associated with a specific component of revenue. Amortization expense included in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 is illustrated below:

 

  Years ended December 31,   2008 versus 2007   2007 versus 2006  Years ended December 31,   2009 versus 2008   2008 versus 2007 
(in millions)  2008  2007  2006   Change  % Change   Change % Change            2009  2008  2007   Change % Change   Change  % Change 
                       

Included in cost of revenue:

                              

Cost of license fees

  $0.3  $0.1  $—      $0.2  200%    $0.1  —  %  $0.4  $0.2  $0.1   $0.2   100   $0.1  100

Cost of services

  1.3  1.2  —      0.1  8%    1.2  —  %   1.3   1.4   1.2    (0.1 (7)%     0.2  17

Cost of maintenance

  0.9  0.4  —      0.5  125%    0.4  —  %   1.3   0.9   0.4    0.4   44    0.5  125

Cost of subscriptions

  2.7  1.1  —      1.6  145%    1.1  —  %   3.2   2.7   1.1    0.5   19    1.6  145

Cost of other revenue

  0.1  0.1  —      —    0%    0.1  —  %   0.1   0.1   0.1    —     0    —    —  
                             

Total included in cost of revenue

  5.3  2.9  —      2.4  83%    2.9  —  %   6.3   5.3   2.9    1.0   19    2.4  83

Included in operating expenses

  0.7  0.5  0.7    0.2  40%    (0.2) (29)%   0.8   0.7   0.5    0.1   14    0.2  40
                             

Total

  $6.0  $3.4  $0.7    $2.6  76%    $2.7  386 %  $7.1  $6.0  $3.4   $1.1   18   $2.6  76
                             

The increases in amortization expense for 2009 compared to 2008 and 2008 compared to 2007 and 2007 compared to 2006 are directly attributable to the acquisitionacquisitions of the Target Companies, eTapestry and Kintera. Identifiable intangible assets of $16.9 million and $32.8 million were recorded during 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to the acquisition of these companies.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased $0.6 million in 2009 when compared to 2008. The decrease is primarily related to the timing of payments and the duration of borrowings under our credit facility. Additionally, a decrease in our effective interest rate contributed to the decrease in interest expense.

Interest expense increased $0.4 million in 2008 when compared to 2007. The increase is primarily related to the timing and amount of borrowings under our credit facility, offset by a decrease in our effective interest rate. During 2008 and 2007, we utilized borrowings under our credit facility for short-term financial needs such as funding business acquisitions and share repurchases. However, in 2008 we carried outstanding debt for a longer period, as compared to 2007.

Interest expense was $1.2 million in 2007 compared with less than $0.1 million in 2006. This increase in interest expense is directly related to our borrowing under our credit facility in connection with the acquisitions of the Target Companies and eTapestry and other short-term liquidity purposes.

Index to Financial Statements

Income tax provision

We record income tax expense in our consolidated financial statements based on an estimated annual effective income tax rate. We had an effective tax rate of 37.7%, 35.3%, and 38.5% in 2009, 2008 and 37.7%2007, respectively. The effective tax rate in 2008 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2008, thewas lower effective rate was principally attributablewhen compared to an increase in the2009 because we generated a greater amount of benefit we were able to recognize for certainfederal and state income tax credits in 2008 that served to lower our effective tax rate for 2008. While we generated federal and certain federalstate income tax credits generated.in 2009, the amounts realized in 2008 were significantly higher.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of business, there are many transactionsfinancial condition and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. results of operations—(Continued)

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach as prescribed by SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This approach requires recognition ofrecord our deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or income tax returns. Using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of an asset or liability. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If a change in the effective tax rate to be applied to the timing differences or a change in a valuation reserve is determined to be appropriate, it will affect the provision for income taxes during the period that the determination is made.

In connection with the acquisition of Kintera in 2008, we recorded deferred tax assets of $22.8 million for state and federal net operating losses and a $2.9 deferred tax valuation allowance for amounts that are expected to expire unused. In 2008 and 2007, we increased our deferred tax asset valuation allowance by $4.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for state credits and net operating losses, including amounts recorded in connection with the acquisition of Kintera, that are expected to expire unused.

Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at an amount based upon a U.S. federal income tax rate of 35.0% and appropriate statutory tax rates of various foreign, state and local jurisdictions in which we operate. If our tax rates change in the future, we may adjust our deferred tax assets and liabilities to an amount reflecting those income tax rates. If suchAny change is determined to be appropriate, it will affect the provision for income taxes during the period that the determination is made.

We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a $0.3 million reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007, the date of adoption, was $0.6 million, of which $0.4 million would impact our effective rate if recognized. As of the date of adoption, the total amount of accrued interest and penalties was $0.3 million.

The following table reconciles the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31:

 

     
(in thousands)  2008 2007   2009 2008 2007 

Balance at beginning of year

  $629  $642   $346   $629  $642 

Increases from prior period positions

   —     13    427    —      13 

Decreases from prior period positions

   —     (12)   —      —      (12

Increases from current period positions

   23   8    485    23    8 

Lapse of statute of limitations

   (306)  —      (27  (306  —    

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

   —     (22)   —      —      (22
            

Balance at end of year

  $346  $629   $1,231  $346  $629 

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impactfavorably affect our effective tax rate was $0.2 million and $0.4$1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.2009. Tax expense for 2008 decreased2009 increased by $0.3$0.9 million for changes in liabilities, penalties and accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. The total amountsamount of

Index to Financial Statements

interest and penalties included in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 iswas $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.million. The total amount of interest and penalties included in the consolidated statement of operations for 2008 iswas $0.1 million.million; interest and penalties were immaterial in 2009.

We have taken positions in certain taxing jurisdictions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits may significantly decrease within the next twelve months. The possible decrease could result from the finalization of state income tax reviews and the expiration of statutes of limitations. The reasonably possible decrease is $0.2$0.3 million.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions and foreign jurisdictions including Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and Australia.Netherlands. We are subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for calendar tax years ending 20042005 through 2007.2008.

Liquidity and capital resources

At December 31, 2008,2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $16.4$22.8 million, compared to $14.8$16.4 million at December 31, 2007.2008. The $1.6$6.4 million increase in cash and cash equivalents during 20082009 is principally the result of:

$60.3of generating $86.8 million of cash generated from operations;

$59.0operations reduced by $59.0 million of net borrowingsin debt repayments on our credit facility;

offset by:

$49.9 million, net of cash acquired, used to purchase Kintera and pay contingent consideration related to the Target Companies and Campagne acquisitions;

$43.7 million used to purchase our stock under our stock repurchase program;

$17.5facility, $17.7 million in dividends paid to stockholders;stockholders and

$7.7 $7.8 million used to purchase fixed assets.

Further details of operating, investingproperty, equipment and financing cash flows are provided below.RLC.

Our principal source of liquidity is our operating cash flow, which depends on continued customer renewal of our maintenance, support and supportsubscription agreements and market acceptance of our products and services. Based on current estimates of revenue and expenses, we believe that the currently available sources of funds and anticipated cash flows from operations will be adequate for at least the next twelve months to finance our operations, fund anticipated capital expenditures and repay any outstanding debt that is due.pay dividends. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to declare or pay further dividends and/or repurchase our common stock.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

At December 31, 20082009 we had no outstanding borrowings under our credit facility were $59.0 million.facility. We have drawn on our credit facility from time to time to help us meet short-term financial needs, such as business acquisitions and purchase of common stock under our repurchase program. OnUnder this five-year credit facility, which matures in July 25, 2007, we entered into a new five-year, $75.0 million credit facility. Under the credit facility,2012, we may elect not more than twice over the term of the agreement to increase the aggregate amount available of $75.0 million by up to $50.0 million, of which wemillion. We exercised one of these options for an additional $15.0 million in June 2008. OurWe believe our $90.0 million credit facility provides us with greatersufficient flexibility to meet our financial flexibility because of its size and more favorable terms compared with the previous $30.0 million facility that would have expired September 30, 2007.needs.

Operating cash flow

Net cash provided by operating activities of $60.3$86.8 million decreased $2.6increased $26.5 million when compared to 2007.2008 primarily due to a decrease in income tax payments of $13.6 million principally attributable to fluctuations in the timing of payments. Throughout both years, our cash flows from operations were derived principally from: (i) our earnings from

Index to Financial Statements

on-going operations prior to non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation and adjustments to our provision for sales returns and allowances; (ii) the tax benefit associated with our deferred tax asset, which reduces our cash outlay for income tax expense; and (iii) changes in our working capital.

Working capital changes as they impact the statement of cash flows are composed of accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue. Net collections of accounts receivable and increases in deferred revenue represent a net increase in cash associated with working capital changes of $8.3$14.6 million and $3.1$9.2 million in 2009 and 2008, and 2007, respectively,respectively. The year-over-year increase is principally due to the reduced billings related to slower sales growth in our subscription and maintenance deferred revenue.when comparing 2009 to 2008. Changes in our balances of accounts payable, accruedprepaid expenses, accrued liabilities and other current assets represent a net decreaseincrease in cash associated with working capital changes of $2.4 million in 2009, compared to a net decrease of $12.9 million in 2008, compared to an increase of $3.2 million in 2007.2008. The primary driversdriver of this change areis (i) a decreasereduction in taxes payableprepaid expenses principally attributable to the receipt of $6.2$4.5 million due toin income tax refunds and (ii) an increase in cash paid forincome taxes payable and a decreaseother accrued liabilities principally attributable to fluctuations in accrued bonusesthe timing of $2.2 million and accrued commissions of $1.4 million.payments.

Investing cash flow

Net cash used in 20082009 for investing activities was $56.0$7.8 million compared to $92.5$56.0 million of net cash used in 2008. The decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2007. The decrease is principally due to a decrease in net cash used for acquisitions of Kintera in 2008 and Target and eTapestry in 2007.acquisitions. We invested $7.7$5.5 million in property and equipment in 20082009 compared to $8.1$7.7 million in 2007, a decrease2008. Vendor payments for $3.7 million of $0.4 million. Additionally, weproperty and equipment purchases received proceedsin 2009 had not been made as of $1.6 million from marketable securities obtainedDecember 31, 2009 and, accordingly, have been reflected as non-cash activity in the Kintera acquisitionour consolidated statement of cash flow for which we subsequently sold or elected not to renew upon maturity.2009.

Financing cash flow

Net cash used in financing activities for 20082009 was $1.0$73.2 million compared to $23.4$1.0 million in 2007.2008. The decreaseincrease in cash used in financing activities wasis primarily due to an increase in net proceeds fromthe larger amount of repayment of borrowings under our credit facility in 2009 compared to 2008. Additionally, in 2008, we borrowed funds, principally to acquire Kintera and repurchase our stock. We did not borrow any funds nor repurchase stock in 2009 and amounts used for acquisition was substantially less in 2009 compared to 2008.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of $59.0 million, partially offset by an increase in dividend paymentsfinancial condition and repurchasesresults of common stock totaling $30.3 million. The remaining difference is due to a decrease in proceeds from stock option exercises and related tax benefits and a decrease in payments associated with the closing of our credit facility.operations—(Continued)

Commitments and contingencies

As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had $1.3 million of outstanding debt and future minimum lease commitments of $137.0$66.6 million as follows:

 

   Payments due by period
(in thousands)  Total  Less than 1
year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than 5
years

Operating leases

  $74,356  $7,545  $12,910  $10,159  $43,742

Capital leases

   639   423   214   2   —  

Debt and interest

   62,025   60,661   1,361   —     —  

Total

  $137,020  $68,629  $14,485  $10,161  $43,742

   Payments due by period
(in millions)  Total  Less than 1
year
  1-2 years  3-5 years  More than 5
years

Operating leases

  $66.4  $7.0  $12.3  $8.8  $38.3

Capital leases

   0.2   0.2   —     —     —  

Debt and interest

   1.3   1.3   —     —     —  

Total

  $67.9  $8.5  $12.3  $8.8  $38.3

Our commitments related to operating leases have not been reduced by the future minimum lease commitments under various sublease agreements that expire in 2010 and 2011, incentive payments infrom the state of South Carolina resulting from the relocation of our headquarters, and reimbursement of leasehold improvements totaling $5.2$4.7 million.

Included in the table above is interest expense of $0.7$0.1 million. The actual interest expense recognized in our consolidated statements of operations will depend on the amount of debt and length of time the debt is outstanding, which could be different from our assumptions used in the table above.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, we had accrued an estimate of $0.2 million related to contingent consideration in connection with the acquisition of RLC. Please refer to Note 2 in our notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information. We are unable to determine the actual amount, if any, for which this liability will be settled, and accordingly, we have not included this amount in the table above.

As of December 31, 2009, we have accrued $0.9 million of federal taxes, $0.3 million of state taxes and $0.2 million of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions taken in current and prior years. Please refer to Note 10 in our notes to the

Index to Financial Statements

consolidated financial statements for further information. We are unable to determine the period in which these liabilities will be settled, and accordingly, we have not included these amounts in the table above.

We utilize third-party relationships in conjunction with our products. The contractual arrangements vary in length from one to fourthree years. In certain cases, these arrangements require a minimum annual purchase commitment. The total minimum annual purchase commitments under these arrangements at December 31, 20082009 are approximately $0.3$3.4 million through 2010,2012, which is not included in the table above. We incurred expense under these arrangements of $0.6$2.4 million, $0.8$1.6 million and $0.7$0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

In February 2009,2010, our Board of Directors approved our annual dividend of $0.40$0.44 per share for 20092010 and declared a first quarter dividend of $0.10$0.11 per share payable on March 13, 200915, 2010 to stockholders of record on February 27, 2009.26, 2010. Dividends at the annual rate would aggregate to $17.6$19.4 million assuming 4444.0 million shares of common stock are outstanding.outstanding, net of treasury stock. Our ability to continue to declare and pay dividends may be restricted by, among other things, the terms of our credit facility, general economic conditions and our ability to generate operating cash flow.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We do not believe we currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons.

Foreign currency exchange rates

Approximately 13.3%12.8% of our total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was derived from operations outside the United States. We do not have significant operations in countries in which the economy is considered to be highly inflationary. Our consolidated financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars and, accordingly, changes in the exchange rate between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the translation of our subsidiaries’ financial results into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our consolidated financial results. The accumulated currency translation adjustment, recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, was $1.0$0.7 million and $0.1$1.0 million at December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.

The vast majority of our contracts are entered into by our U.S., Canadian or U.K. entities. The contracts entered into by the U.S. entity are almost always denominated in U.S. dollars, contracts entered into by our Canadian subsidiary are generally denominated in Canadian dollars, and contracts entered into by our U.K. subsidiary, Australian and Netherlands subsidiaries are generally denominated in pounds sterling. In recent years, with the exception of the second half of 2008, the U.S. dollar has weakened against many non-U.S. currencies, including the British poundsterling, Australian dollars and Canadian dollar.euros, respectively. Historically, as the U.S. dollar weakened, foreign currency translation resulted in an increase in our revenues and expenses denominated in non-U.S. currencies. During the second half of 2008, we experienced a strengthening in the U.S. dollar and2009, the foreign currency translation has resulted in a decrease in our reported revenues and expenses denominated in non-U.S. currencies.

Additionally, in the second halfcurrencies when compared to 2008. Though we do not believe our increased exposure to currency exchange rates has had a material impact on our results of 2008, due to the strengthening in the U.S. dollar,operations or financial position, we experienced an unfavorable impact of $1.7 million to our cash and cash equivalents balance held by our non-U.S. subsidiaries in their local currency. We intend to continue to monitor our foreign currency exchange rate exposure and take action as appropriate.

Critical accounting policies and estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and

Index to Financial Statements

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those that impact revenue recognition, our allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill, stock-based compensation and provision for income taxes, valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and contingencies.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from any of our estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the critical accounting policies listed below affect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue recognition

Our revenue is primarily generated primarily byfrom the following sources: (1) selling perpetual licenses orof our software products; (2) providing professional services including implementation, training, consulting, hosting and other services; (3) providing software maintenance and support services; and (4) charging for the use of our software products in a hosted environment.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and providing support, training, consulting, technicalanalysis of financial condition and other professional services for those products. We make available certain software products for use in hosted application arrangements without licensing perpetual rights to the software (hosted applications). Additionally we provide hosting services to customers who have purchased perpetual rights to certainresults of our software products (hosting services).operations—(Continued)

License fees

We recognize revenue from the sale of perpetual software license rights to software when all of the following conditions are met:

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, exists;

the product has been delivered, title and risk of loss have transferred to the customers, delivered;

the fee is fixed or determinabledeterminable; and

collection of the resulting receivable is probable.

We deem acceptance of an agreement to be evidence of an arrangement. Delivery occurs when the product is shipped or transmitted.transmitted, and title and risk of loss have transferred to the customers. Our typical license agreement does not include customer acceptance provisions; however, if acceptance provisions are provided, delivery is deemed to occur upon acceptance. We consider the fee to be fixed or determinable unless the fee is subject to refund or adjustment or is not payable within our standard payment terms. We consider paymentPayment terms greater than 90 days are considered to be beyond our customary payment terms. We deem collectionCollection is deemed probable if we expect that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as they become due. If we determine that collection is not probable, we postponedefer revenue recognition of the revenue until collection.

We sell software licenses with maintenance, varying levels of professional services and, in certain instances, with hosting services. We allocate revenue to delivered components, normally the license component of the arrangement, using the residual value method based on objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements, which is specific to us. Fair value for maintenance services associated with software licenses is based upon renewal rates stated in the agreements with customers, which vary according to the level of support service provided under the maintenance program. Fair value of professional services and other products and services is based on sales of these products and services to other customers when sold on a stand-alone basis. Revenue from hosting services associatedWhen a software license is sold with software licensed under perpetual rights is recognized ratably overcustomization services, generally the period services are performed.

For contractual arrangements covering the use of our hosted applications, such as Kintera Sphere, eTapestry and TeamApproach, the stand alone value of the delivered items and fair value of undelivered items in the arrangement have not been established. Such items would include upfront activation, implementation and hosting of the solution. For these arrangements we treat the transaction as a single element and the revenue is deferred until the hosted application is deployed and in use, at which time revenue is recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement. Revenue from transaction processing fees is recognized when received. Credit card fees directly associated with processingto provide customer donations and billed to customers are netted in revenue in accordance with EITF Issue 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal verses Net as an Agent.” Direct and incremental costs relating to activation and implementation are capitalized until the hosted application is deployed and in use, and then expensed over the remaining term of the arrangement.

The application of U.S. GAAP requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for those elements.

Index to Financial Statements

As we develop new products, we could experience difficulty in determining VSOE regarding the fair value of those new products. This would result in the deferral of revenue on those transactions until all elements of the arrangement have been delivered or until VSOE is established for the undelivered elements.

Our consulting, installation and implementation services, are generally billed based on hourly rates plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. For small service engagements, less than $10,000, we frequently contract for and bill based on a fixed fee plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. We recognize this revenue upon completion of the work performed. When our services include software customization, these services are typically provided to support customer requests for assistance in creating special reports and other minor enhancements that will assist with efforts to improve operational efficiency and/or to support business process improvements. These services are not essential to the functionality of the software and rarely exceed three months in duration. We recognize revenue as these services are performed.software. However, when software customization services are considered essential to the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue for both the software license and the services on a percent-complete basis. These

Services

We generally bill consulting, installation and implementation services based on hourly rates plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. Revenue is recognized for these services over the period the services are performed. For service engagements of less than $10,000, we frequently contract for and bill based on a fixed price contracts are generally larger in size and longer in duration.fee plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. We recognize this revenue upon completion of the work performed.

We recognize analytic services revenue from donor prospect research engagements, salesthe sale of lists of potential donors, benchmarking studies and data modeling service engagements upon delivery.

We sell training at a fixed rate for each specific class, at a per attendee price or at a packaged price for several attendees, and revenue is recognized only upon the customer attending and completing training. Additionally, we sell a fixed-rate program, which permits customers to attend unlimited training over a specified contract period, typically one year, subject to certain restrictions, and revenue is recognized ratably over this contract period.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Maintenance

We recognize revenue from maintenance services ratably over the contract term, which is principallytypically one year. Maintenance contracts are at rates that vary according to the level of the maintenance program and are generally renewable annually. Maintenance contracts also include the right to unspecified product upgrades on an if-and-when available basis. Certain support services are sold in prepaid units of time and recognized as revenue upon their usage.

Subscription revenue associated withSubscriptions

We provide hosting services to customers who have purchased perpetual rights to certain of our software products (hosting services). Revenue from hosting services, as well as data enrichment services, data management services and online training programs and any related set-up fees, areis recognized ratably over the service period of the contract. Any related set-up fees are also recognized ratably over the service period of the contract.

We are increasingly making certain of our software products available for use in hosted application arrangements without licensing perpetual rights to the software (hosted applications). Revenue from hosted applications is recognized over the subscription agreement, which generally ranges from one to three years. For contractual arrangements covering the use of hosted applications the stand alone value of the delivered items or the fair value of undelivered items in the arrangement have not been established. Such items include upfront activation, implementation and hosting of the solution. For these arrangements we treat the transaction as a single element and the revenue is deferred until the hosted application is deployed and in use, at which time revenue is recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement. Direct and incremental costs relating to activation and implementation are capitalized until the hosted application is deployed and in use, and then expensed over the remaining term of the arrangement.

Revenue from transaction processing fees is recognized when received. Credit card fees directly associated with processing donations for customers are included in subscription revenue, net of related transaction costs.

Deferred revenue

To the extent that our customers are billed or pay for the above described services in advance of delivery, such amounts are recorded in deferred revenue.

Sales returns and allowance for doubtful accounts

We provide customers a 30-day right of return and maintain a reserve for returns. We estimate the amount of this reserve based on historical experience. Provisions for sales returns are charged against the related revenue items.

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount we estimate to be sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses resulting from extending credit to our customers. In judging the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider multiple factors including historical bad debt experience, the general economic environment, the need for specific customer reserves and the aging of our receivables. Any necessary provision is reflected in general and administrative expense. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing these factors and if any receivables were to deteriorate, an additional provision for doubtful accounts could be required.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill

We review identifiable intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment when events change or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the market value of the business or asset acquired, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which the business or asset acquired is used or significant adverse change in the business climate. If such events or changes

Index to Financial Statements

in circumstances occur, we use the undiscounted cash flow method to determine whether the asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. To the extent that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, we measure the impairment using discounted cash flows. The discount rate utilized would be based on our best estimate of our risks and required investment returns at the time the impairment assessment is made.

Goodwill is assigned to our reporting units, which are defined as the License Fees, Consulting and Education Services, Analytic Services, Maintenance and Subscriptions operating segments. We test goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, impairment is indicated. If an impairment is indicated, the impairment is measured as the excess of the recorded goodwill over its fair value, which could materially adversely impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

We estimate fair value for each reporting unit based on projected future cash flows discounted using our weighted average cost of capital. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in estimating the fair value of each reporting unit, including revenue growth rates, operating margins, capital spending, discount rate, and working capital changes. Additionally, we make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values for each of our reporting units. We believe the assumptions we use in estimating fair value of our reporting units are reasonable, but are also unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Even if our estimated fair value of the reporting units significantly declined, no impairment would be indicated. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. We determine the fair value of the stock options and stock appreciation rights using an option pricing model, which requires us to use significant judgment to make estimates regarding the life of the award, volatility of our stock price, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield of our stock over the life of the award. Changes to these estimates would result in different fair values of awards.

We estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited and recognize expense only for those awards that ultimately vest. Significant judgment is required in determining the adjustment to compensation expense for estimated forfeitures. Compensation expense in a period could be impacted, favorably or unfavorably, by differences between forfeiture estimates and actual forfeitures.

Provision for income tax and valuation of deferred tax assets

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or income tax returns. Using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

differences to reverse, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of an asset or liability. We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Significant judgment is required in determining income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in a net deferred tax asset or liability that is included in our consolidated balance sheets. The final outcome of these matters for tax reporting purposes might be different than that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions, benefits and accruals. Any difference could have a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period in which such a determination is made.

Index to Financial Statements

Prior to October 13, 1999, we were organized as an S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code and, therefore, were not subject to federal income taxes. In addition, we were not subject to income tax in many of the states in which we operated as a result of our S corporation status. We historically made distributions to our stockholders to cover the stockholders’ anticipated tax liability. In connection with our 1999 recapitalization, we converted our U.S. taxable status from an S corporation to a C corporation. Accordingly, since October 14, 1999 we have been subject to federal and state income taxes. Upon the conversion and in connection with the recapitalization, we recorded a one-time benefit of $107.0 million to establish a deferred tax asset.

We assess the likelihood that the netour deferred tax assetassets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance, we include an expense within the income tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations. ExceptOur valuation allowance of $8.0 million at December 31, 2009 is primarily associated with respect to deferred tax assets associated withfor certain state income tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards that we have determined are not recorded a valuation allowance as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, because we expectmore-likely-than-not to be able to utilize our entire net deferred tax asset.realized. The ability to utilize our net deferred tax asset is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable income. Based on current estimates of revenue and expenses, we expect future taxable income will be sufficient to recoverrealize the annual amount of additionalremaining deferred tax deductions permitted.assets. Even if actual results are significantly below our current estimates, the recovery still remains likely and, except for the state tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards discussed above, no valuation allowance would be necessary.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. To the extent that final results differ from estimated amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made and could have an impact on the deferred tax asset. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at an amount based upon a U.S. federal income tax rate of 35.0%. and appropriate statutory rates of various foreign, state and local jurisdictions in which we operate. If our projected taxable income falls and our tax rate decreases,rates change, we will adjust our deferred tax assets and liabilities to an amount reflecting a reduced expected U.S. federalthose income tax rate.rates. If such change is determined to be appropriate, it will affect the provision for income taxes during the period that the determination is made.

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,” (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. Under FIN 48 we recognize the tax impact from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Such tax impact recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. Significant judgment is required in the identification and measurement of uncertain tax positions.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—(Continued)

Contingencies

We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies in the normal course of business. We record an accrual for a contingency when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Often these issues are subject to substantial uncertainties and, therefore, the probability of loss and the estimation of damages are difficult to ascertain. These assessments can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by us. Although we believe we have substantial defenses in these matters, we could incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows in any particular period.

NewRecently issued accounting pronouncements

In September 2006,October 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157),released Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, which defines fair value,amends the existing criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. Arrangement that include perpetual software licenses are excluded from the scope of this ASU. ASU 2009-13 establishes guidelinesa hierarchy for measuring fair valuedetermining the selling price of a deliverable and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 was effectiverequires the use of best estimate of the selling price when VSOE or third party evidence (TPE) of the selling price cannot be determined. As a result of the requirement to use the best estimate of the selling price when VSOE or TPE of the selling price cannot be determined, the residual method will no longer be permitted. ASU 2009-13 is applicable prospectively for

Index to Financial Statements

fiscal years beginning revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after November 15, 2007. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2), which delayed the effectiveadoption date of SFAS No. 157or retrospectively for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those thatperiods presented. We are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 partially deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157required to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Further, in October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, which provides clarifying guidance on valuing securities in markets that are not active. Except as permitted in FSP 157-2, we adopted SFAS No. 157adopt ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2008 with no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisition of Kintera, we acquired marketable securities and long-term debt which2011. Early adoption is permitted. We are subject to SFAS No. 157. The marketable securities were redeemed or sold prior to December 31, 2008. We have included the disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 157 for the long-term debt we assumed from Kintera. The major categories of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, for which we have not yet applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157, include goodwill and long-lived assets subject to impairment tests under SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. We do not expect the further adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2009 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in it’s financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We expect SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on the accounting for future business combinations. The extent ofcurrently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 141(R) on future acquisitions is largely dependent upon the size and nature of the acquisitions.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 removes the requirement of SFAS No. 142 for an entity to consider, when determining the useful life of an acquired intangible asset, whether the intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost or material modifications to the existing terms and conditions associated with the intangible asset. FSP FAS 142-3 replaces the previous useful-life assessment criteria with a requirement that an entity consider its own experience in renewing similar arrangements. If the entity has no relevant experience, it would consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset applies to such assets acquired after the effective date, and the disclosure requirements apply to all intangible assets recognized as of and subsequent to the effective date. We do not expect FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impactASU 2009-13 on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) participating securities and should be included in the calculation of basic earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

Cautionary statement

We operate in a highly competitive environment that involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control. The following statement highlights some of these risks.

Statements contained in this Form 10-K whichthat are not historical facts, are or might constitute forward-looking statements under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations expressed in the report includeinclude: general economic risk; lengthy sales and implementation cycles, particularly in larger organizations; uncertainty regarding increased business and renewals from existing customers; continued success in sales growth; lengthy sales and implementation cycles, particularly in larger organizations; risk associated with successful implementation of multiple integrated software products; management of integration of recently acquired companiestechnological changes that make our products and other risks associated with acquisitions;services less competitive; the ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to our dividend policy and stock repurchase program, including potential limitations on our ability to grow and the possibility that we might discontinue payment of dividends; risks relating to restrictions imposed by the credit facility; management of integration of recently acquired companies and other risks associated with acquisitions; risks associated with management of growth; technological changes that make our products and services less competitive; and the other risk factors set forth from time to time in our SEC filings.

Index to Financial Statements

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Item 7A.Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

We have market rate sensitivity for interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Our variable rate debt is our primary financial instrument with market risk exposure for changing interest rates. We manage interest rate risk through a combination of short-term and long-term borrowings and a mix between borrowings indexed at prime, federal funds and LIBOR rates. Due to the nature of our short-term investments and the lack of material debt, we have concluded at December 31, 2009 that we currently do not face no material market risk exposure. Therefore, no quantitative tabular disclosures are required. For a discussion of our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, see the “Foreign currency exchange rates” section of Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in this report.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Item 8.Financial statements and supplementary data

The information required by this Item is set forth in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning at page F-1 of this report.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Item 9.Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 9A.Controls and procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are designed only to provide reasonable assurance that they will meet their objectives. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide the reasonable assurance discussed above.

Index to Financial Statements

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

As previously reported and as further discussed in this report on Form 10-K, we acquired Kintera on July 8, 2008. Management is in the process of assessing and integrating internal control over financial reporting for the acquisition. No change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter with respect to our operations, excluding Kintera, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management has excluded Kintera from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 because they were acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2008. Kintera is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent $75.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, based on the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.

Index to Financial Statements

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20082009 has been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report, which is included herein.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 9B.Other information

None.

Index to Financial Statements

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Item 10.Directors, executive officers and corporate governance

The information required by Item 10 with respect to Directors and Executive Officers is incorporated by

reference from the information under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Information Regarding Matters of the Board and Committees,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics,” contained in Blackbaud’s Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June 16, 2009,23, 2010, except for the identification of executive officers of the Registrant which is set forth in Part I of this report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 11.Executive compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption

“Executive “Executive Compensation and Other Matters,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Summary Compensation Table” contained in Blackbaud’s Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June  16, 2009.23, 2010.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 12.Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from information under the captions

“Security “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year-End”“Equity Compensation Plan Information” contained in Blackbaud’s Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June 16, 2009.23, 2010.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Item 13.Certain relationships, related transactions and director independence

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption

“Transactions “Transactions with Related Persons,” and “Independence of Directors” contained in Blackbaud’s Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June 16, 2009.23, 2010.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Item 14.Principal accountant fees and services

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Audit Committee Report,” contained in Blackbaud’s Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June 16, 2009.23, 2010.

Index to Financial Statements

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Item 15.Exhibits and financial statement schedules

(a)Financial statements

The following statements are filed as part of this report:

 

   

Page

Report of independent registered public accounting firm

  F-2

Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008

  F-3

Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-4

Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-5

Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-6

Notes to consolidated financial statements

  F-7

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements thereto.

(b)Exhibits

 

     Filed In     Filed In
Exhibit number  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
  Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith
  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
  Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith

2.1

  

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reincorporation dated April 6, 2004

  S-1  04/06/04  2.1    

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reincorporation dated April 6, 2004

  S-1  04/06/04  2.1  

2.2

  

Stock Purchase Agreement among Target Software, Inc., Target Analysis Group, Inc., all of the Stockholders of Target Software Inc. and Target Analysis Group, Inc. and Blackbaud, Inc.

  8-K  01/18/07  2.2    

Stock Purchase Agreement among Target Software, Inc., Target Analysis Group, Inc., all of the Stockholders of Target Software Inc. and Target Analysis Group, Inc. and Blackbaud, Inc.

  8-K  01/18/07  2.2  

3.1

  

Certificate of Incorporation of Blackbaud, Inc.

  S-1  04/06/04  3.1    

Certificate of Incorporation of Blackbaud, Inc.

  S-1  04/06/04  3.1  

3.3

  

Amended and Restated By-laws of Blackbaud, Inc.

  8-K  12/23/08  3.3    

Amended and Restated By-laws of Blackbaud, Inc.

  8-K  12/23/08  3.3  

10.5

  

Trademark License and Promotional Agreement dated as of October 13, 1999 between Blackbaud, Inc. and Charleston Battery, Inc.

  S-1  02/20/04  10.5    

Trademark License and Promotional Agreement dated as of October 13, 1999 between Blackbaud, Inc. and Charleston Battery, Inc.

  S-1  02/20/04  10.5  

10.6

  

Blackbaud, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended

  S-1  04/06/04  10.6    

Blackbaud, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended

  S-1  04/06/04  10.6  

10.8

  

Blackbaud, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended

  S-1  04/06/04  10.8    

Blackbaud, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended

  S-1  04/06/04  10.8  

10.20

  

Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan, as amended, together with Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement

  8-K  06/20/06  10.20    

Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan, as amended, together with Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement

  8-K  06/20/06  10.20  

10.25

  

Employment and Noncompetition Agreement between Blackbaud, Inc. and Marc Chardon, effective November 28, 2005

  8-K  11/07/05  10.25  

10.26

  

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement under the Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan

  10-K  02/28/07  10.26  

10.26

  

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement under the Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan

  10-K  2/28/07  10.26  

10.27

  

Form of Notice of Stock Appreciation Rights Grant and Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under the Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan

  10-K  02/28/07  10.27  

Index to Financial Statements
     Filed In     Filed In
Exhibit number  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
 Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith
  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
 Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith
10.27  

Form of Notice of Stock Appreciation Rights Grant and Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under the Blackbaud, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan

  10-K 2/28/07  10.27  
10.28  

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among Blackbaud, as Borrower, the Lenders, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Lender, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Manager.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.28    

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among Blackbaud, as Borrower, the Lenders, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Lender, and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Manager.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.28  
10.29  

Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among certain subsidiaries of Blackbaud, as Guarantors, in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.29    

Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among certain subsidiaries of Blackbaud, as Guarantors, in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.29  
10.30  

Pledge Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among Blackbaud, its subsidiaries in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the ratable benefit of itself and the Lenders.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.30    

Pledge Agreement dated as of July 25, 2007 by and among Blackbaud, its subsidiaries in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the ratable benefit of itself and the Lenders.

  8-K 07/31/07  10.30  
10.31  

Form of Tender and Support Agreement by and between Blackbaud, Inc. and certain stockholders of Kintera, Inc.

  8-K 05/30/08  10.31    

Form of Tender and Support Agreement by and between Blackbaud, Inc. and certain stockholders of Kintera, Inc.

  8-K 05/30/08  10.31  
10.32  

First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Lender Addition and Acknowledgement Agreement dated as of June 23, 2008

  8-K 06/26/08  10.32    

First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Lender Addition and Acknowledgement Agreement dated as of June 23, 2008

  8-K 06/26/08  10.32  
10.33  

Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  DEF 14A 04/29/08      

Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  DEF 14A 04/29/08    
10.34  

Form of Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.34    

Form of Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.34  
10.35  

Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.35    

Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.35  
10.36  

Form of Notice of Grant and Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.36    

Form of Notice of Grant and Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

  S-8 08/04/08  10.36  
10.37  

Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder

  10-K/A* 03/26/08  10.2    

Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder

  10-K/A* 03/26/08  10.2  
10.38  

Kintera, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder

  10-K/A* 03/26/08  10.3    

Kintera, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder

  10-K/A* 03/26/08  10.3  
10.39  

Form of Retention Agreement

  10-Q 11/05/08  10.37    

Form of Retention Agreement

  10-Q 11/05/08  10.37  
10.40  

Triple Net Lease Agreement dated as of October 1, 2008 between Blackbaud, Inc. and Duck Pond Creek-SPE, LLC

  8-K 12/11/08  10.37  

Index to Financial Statements
     Filed In     Filed In
Exhibit number  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
  Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith
  Description of Document  Registrant’s
Form
 Dated  Exhibit
Number
  Filed
Herewith
10.40  

Triple Net Lease Agreement dated as of October 1, 2008 between Blackbaud, Inc. and Duck Pond Creek-SPE, LLC

  8-K  12/11/08  10.37  
10.41  

Blackbaud, Inc. 2009 Equity Compensation Plan for Employees from Acquired Companies

  S-8 07/02/09  10.41  
10.42  

Share Purchase Agreement between RLC Group B.V., as the Seller, and Blackbaud, Inc., as the Purchaser

  10-Q 08/07/09  10.42  
10.43  

Amended and Restated Employment and Noncompetition Agreement dated January 28, 2010 between Blackbaud, Inc. and Marc Chardon

  8-K** 02/01/10  10.43  
21.1  

Subsidiaries of Blackbaud, Inc

        X  

Subsidiaries of Blackbaud, Inc

       X
23.1  

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        X  

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

       X
31.1  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        X  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

       X
31.2  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        X  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

       X
32.1  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        X  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

       X
32.2  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        X  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

       X

 

*The Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder (Kintera 2000 Plan Documents) and the Kintera, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and form of Stock Option Agreement thereunder (Kintera 2003 Plan Documents) were filed by Kintera in its Form 10-K/A on March 26, 2008 as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3, respectively. We assumed the Kintera 2000 Plan Documents and Kintera 2003 Plan Documents when we acquired Kintera in July 2008. We filed the Kintera 2000 Plan Documents and Kintera 2003 Plan Documents by incorporation by reference as exhibits 10.37 and 10.38, respectively, in our Form S-8 on August 4, 2008.

**The registrant has received confidential treatment with respect to portions of this exhibit. Those portions have been omitted from the exhibit and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  BLACKBAUD, INC

Signed: March 2, 2009

February 26, 2010
  

/S/    MARC E. CHARDON        

  President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and on the dates indicated.

 

/S/    MARC E. CHARDON        

Marc E. Chardon

  

President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    TIMOTHY V. WILLIAMS

Timothy V. Williams

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    MAARCONDREW W. HM. LELLMANEITCH        

Marco W. HellmanAndrew M. Leitch

  

Chairman of the Board

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    TIMOTHY CHOU        

Timothy Chou

  

Director

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    GEORGE H. ELLIS        

George H. Ellis

  

Director

 Date: March 2, 2009

/S/    ANDREW M. LEITCH        

Andrew M. Leitch

Director

Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    JOHN P. MCCONNELL        

John P. McConnell

  

Director

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

/S/    CAROLYN MILES        

Carolyn Miles

  

Director

 Date: March 2, 2009February 26, 2010

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

Index to consolidated financial statements

 

   Page

Report of independent registered public accounting firm

  F-2

Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008

  F-3

Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-4

Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-5

Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

  F-6

Notes to consolidated financial statements

  F-7

Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Blackbaud, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of cash flows and of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blackbaud, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20082009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for uncertain tax positions in 2007.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Kintera, Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2008. We have also excluded Kintera, Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Kintera, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent $75.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

February 27, 200925, 2010

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSConsolidated balance sheets

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands, except share amounts)  2008 2007   2009 2008 

Assets

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $16,361  $14,775   $22,769   $16,361  

Donor restricted cash

   12,363   —      12,874    12,363  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,777 and $1,935 at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively

   52,554   44,689 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,559 and $2,777 at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively

   50,220    52,554  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   17,281   11,279    18,155    17,281  

Deferred tax asset, current portion

   6,858   2,276    5,728    6,858  
          

Total current assets

   105,417   73,019    109,746    105,417  

Property and equipment, net

   21,384   16,962    22,507    21,384  

Deferred tax asset

   64,762   51,696    55,570    64,762  

Goodwill

   73,615   58,275    73,919    73,615  

Intangible assets, net

   48,171   37,272    42,019    48,171  

Other assets

   537   470    468    537  
          

Total assets

  $313,886  $237,694   $304,229   $313,886  
          

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

      

Current liabilities:

      

Trade accounts payable

  $7,023  $5,802   $10,683   $7,023  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   21,758   20,575    25,974    22,142  

Donations payable

   12,363   —      12,874    12,363  

Capital lease obligations, current portion

   384   513 

Debt, current portion

   60,049   —      1,288    60,049  

Deferred revenue

   113,802   93,106    129,412    113,802  
          

Total current liabilities

   215,379   119,996    180,231    215,379  

Capital lease obligations, noncurrent

   203   586 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

   1,288   —      —      1,288  

Deferred revenue, noncurrent

   5,838   2,994    6,172    5,838  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   670   1,015    1,720    873  
          

Total liabilities

   223,378   124,591    188,123    223,378  
          

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 9)

      

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock; 20,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding

   —     —      —      —    

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 51,269,081 and 50,450,675 shares issued at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively

   51   50 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 52,214,606 and 51,269,081 shares issued at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively

   52    51  

Additional paid-in capital

   116,846   105,687    134,726    116,846  

Treasury stock, at cost; 7,494,466 and 5,431,852 shares at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively

   (130,594)  (85,487)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

   (899)  137 

Treasury stock, at cost; 7,677,341 and 7,494,466 shares at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively

   (134,382  (130,594

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (201  (899

Retained earnings

   105,104   92,716    115,911    105,104  
          

Total stockholders’ equity

   90,508   113,103    116,106    90,508  
          

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $313,886  $  237,694   $304,229   $313,886  
          

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSConsolidated statements of operations

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  2008 2007 2006   2009 2008 2007 

Revenue

        

License fees

  $35,932  $37,569  $32,500   $25,392   $35,932   $37,569  

Services

   100,824   91,376   61,242    87,834    100,824    91,376  

Maintenance

   107,304   94,602   80,893    116,476    107,304    94,602  

Subscriptions

   49,705   25,389   10,605    72,898    49,705    25,389  

Other revenue

   8,730   8,102   6,140    6,738    8,730    8,102  
          

Total revenue

   302,495   257,038   191,380    309,338    302,495    257,038  
          

Cost of revenue

        

Cost of license fees

   3,316   2,870   2,260    3,582    3,316    2,870  

Cost of services

   63,960   54,908   33,717    61,713    63,960    54,908  

Cost of maintenance

   20,185   17,119   13,225    21,364    20,185    17,119  

Cost of subscriptions

   20,587   10,306   2,360    28,183    20,587    10,306  

Cost of other revenue

   8,368   7,274   5,709    6,098    8,368    7,274  
          

Total cost of revenue

   116,416   92,477   57,271    120,940    116,416    92,477  
          

Gross profit

   186,079   164,561   134,109    188,398    186,079    164,561  
          

Operating expenses

        

Sales and marketing

   65,185   56,994   41,405    62,796    65,185    56,994  

Research and development

   38,708   28,525   23,118    45,662    38,708    28,525  

General and administrative

   34,072   26,144   21,757    33,380    34,072    26,144  

Amortization

   713   491   699    768    713    491  
          

Total operating expenses

   138,678   112,154   86,979    142,606    138,678    112,154  
          

Income from operations

   47,401   52,407   47,130    45,792    47,401    52,407  

Interest income

   526   813   1,584    637    526    813  

Interest expense

   (1,526)  (1,164)  (48)   (962  (1,526  (1,164

Other expense, net

   (194)  (503)  (238)

Other income (expense), net

   220    (194  (503
          

Income before provision for income taxes

   46,207   51,553   48,428    45,687    46,207    51,553  

Income tax provision

   16,329   19,829   18,275    17,240    16,329    19,829  
          

Net income

  $29,878  $31,724  $30,153   $28,447   $29,878   $31,724  
          

Earnings per share

        

Basic

  $0.70  $0.73  $0.70   $0.67   $0.70   $0.73  

Diluted

  $0.68  $0.71  $0.68   $0.65   $0.68   $0.71  

Common shares and equivalents outstanding

        

Basic weighted average shares

   42,958,947   43,619,158   43,320,096    42,771,173    42,958,947    43,619,158  

Diluted weighted average shares

   43,958,557   44,595,483   44,668,476    43,600,048    43,958,557    44,595,483  

Dividends per share

  $0.40  $0.34  $0.28   $0.40   $0.40   $0.34  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSConsolidated statements of cash flows

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008 2007 2006   2009 2008 2007 

Cash flows from operating activities

        

Net income

  $29,878  $31,724  $30,153   $28,447   $29,878   $31,724  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

   12,865   8,149   3,709    15,509    12,865    8,149  

Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns

   4,179   2,661   1,673    3,458    4,179    2,661  

Stock-based compensation expense

   12,085   6,934   7,400    12,287    12,085    6,934  

Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options

   (1,497)  (4,931)  (6,041)   (2,405  (1,497  (4,931

Deferred taxes

   6,407   12,491   11,941    12,351    6,407    12,491  

Other non-cash adjustments

   110   65   48    116    110    65  

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:

    

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition of businesses:

    

Accounts receivable

   (10,193)  (10,367)  (5,235)   1,375    (10,193  (10,367

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   (5,635)  (2,005)  266    2,122    (5,635  (2,005

Trade accounts payable

   614   (830)  1,147    (312  614    (830

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (7,907)  6,079   6,135 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   612    (7,907  6,079  

Donor restricted cash

   (3,763)  —     —      (511  (3,763  —    

Donations payable

   3,763   —     —      511    3,763    —    

Deferred revenue

   19,404   12,897   11,759    13,237    19,404    12,897  
          

Net cash provided by operating activities

   60,310   62,867   62,955    86,797    60,310    62,867  
          

Cash flows from investing activities

        

Purchase of property and equipment

   (7,692)  (8,123)  (4,654)   (5,534  (7,692  (8,123

Purchase of net assets of acquired companies, net of cash acquired

   (49,916)  (84,405)  (6,146)   (2,258  (49,916  (84,405

Proceeds from sale and maturity of marketable securities

   1,575   —     —      —      1,575    —    
          

Net cash used in investing activities

   (56,033)  (92,528)  (10,800)   (7,792  (56,033  (92,528
          

Cash flows from financing activities

        

Proceeds from issuance of debt

   86,000   48,000   —      —      86,000    48,000  

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

   883   5,451   7,883    2,509    883    5,451  

Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options

   1,497   4,931   6,041    2,405    1,497    4,931  

Payments on debt

   (27,527)  (49,934)  —      (60,049  (27,527  (49,934

Payments of deferred financing fees

   (47)  (418)  —      —      (47  (418

Payments on capital lease obligations

   (540)  (477)  —      (384  (540  (477

Purchase of treasury stock

   (43,727)  (15,857)  (8,728)   —      (43,727  (15,857

Dividend payments to stockholders

   (17,497)  (15,074)  (12,283)   (17,673  (17,497  (15,074
          

Net cash used in financing activities

   (958)  (23,378)  (7,087)   (73,192  (958  (23,378
          

Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents

   (1,733)  31   32    595    (1,733  31  
          

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   1,586   (53,008)  45,100    6,408    1,586    (53,008

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

   14,775   67,783   22,683    16,361    14,775    67,783  
          

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $16,361  $14,775  $67,783   $22,769   $16,361   $14,775  
          

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

    

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

    

Cash paid during the year for:

        

Interest

  $1,375  $1,126  $—     $615   $1,375   $1,126  

Taxes

   11,041   5,607   674 

Taxes, net of refunds

  $(2,584 $11,041   $5,607  

Purchase of equipment included in accounts payable

  $3,699   $—     $—    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INCBlackbaud, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEConsolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income

 

 Comprehensive  
income  
  Common stock Additional
paid-in
capital
  Deferred
compensation
  Treasury
stock
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
  Retained
earnings
  Total
stockholders’
equity
   Comprehensive  
income  
   Common stock  

Additional
paid-in

capital

  

Treasury

stock

  

Accumulated
other
comprehensive

income (loss)

  

Retained

earnings

  

Total
stockholders’

equity

 
(in thousands, except share amounts) Shares Amount   Shares Amount   

Balance at December 31, 2005

   47,529,836  $48 $73,583  $(6,497) $(60,902) $92  $58,428  $64,752 
    

Net income

 $30,153  —     —    —     —     —     —     30,153   30,153 

Payment of dividends

  —    —     —    —     —     —     —     (12,283)  (12,283)

Purchase of 442,000 treasury shares under stock repurchase program and surrender of 34,582 shares upon option exercises and stock vesting

  —    —     —    —     —     (8,728)  —     —     (8,728)

Exercise of stock options

  —    1,449,468   1  7,863   —     —     —     —     7,864 

Tax impact of exercise of nonqualified stock options

  —    —     —    6,060   —     —     —     —     6,060 

Reclassification due to adoption of new accounting pronouncement

  —    —     —    (6,497)  6,497   —     —     —     —   

Cumulative effect adjustment to assume historical forfeitures

  —    —     —    (20)  —     —     —     —     (20)

Stock-based compensation

  —    —     —    7,420   —     —     —     —     7,420 

Restricted stock grants

  —    284,295   —    —     —     —     —     —     —   

Restricted stock cancellations

  —    (58,077)  —    —     —     —     —     —    

Translation adjustment, net of tax

  140  —     —    —     —     —     140   —     140 
    

Comprehensive income

 $30,293         

Balance at December 31, 2006

   49,205,522  $49 $88,409  $—    $(69,630) $232  $76,298  $95,358      49,205,522   $49  $88,409   $(69,630 $232   $76,298   $95,358  
           

Net income

 $31,724  —     —    —     —     —     —     31,724   31,724   $            31,724    —      —     —      —      —      31,724    31,724  

Payment of dividends

  —    —     —    —     —     —     —     (15,074)  (15,074)   —      —      —     —      —      —      (15,074  (15,074

Purchase of 633,878 treasury shares under stock repurchase program and surrender of 54,079 shares upon restricted stock vesting

  —    —     —    —     —     (15,857)  —     —     (15,857)   —      —      —     —      (15,857  —      —      (15,857

Exercise of stock options

  —    776,125   1  5,450   —     —     —     —     5,451    —      776,125    1   5,450    —      —      —      5,451  

Tax impact of exercise of nonqualified stock options

  —    —     —    4,931   —     —     —     —     4,931    —      —      —     4,931    —      —      —      4,931  

Cumulative effect of FIN 48 adoption

  —    —     —    —     —     —     —     (269)  (269)

Cumulative effect of the adoption of a new income tax standard

   —      —      —     —      —      —      (269  (269

Stock-based compensation

  —    —     —    6,897   —     —     —     37   6,934    —        —     6,897    —      —      37    6,934  

Restricted stock grants

  —    549,320   —    —     —     —     —     —     —      —      549,320    —     —      —      —      —      —    

Restricted stock cancellations

  —    (80,292)  —    —     —     —     —     —       —      (80,292  —     —      —      —      —      —    

Translation adjustment, net of tax

  (95) —     —    —     —     —     (95)  —     (95)   (95  —      —     —      —      (95  —      (95
         

Comprehensive income

 $31,629           $31,629           

Balance at December 31, 2007

   50,450,675  $50 $105,687  $—    $(85,487) $137  $92,716  $113,103       50,450,675   $50  $105,687   $(85,487 $137   $92,716   $113,103  
      

Net income

 $29,878  —     —    —     —     —     —     29,878   29,878   $29,878    —      —     —      —      —      29,878    29,878  

Payment of dividends

  —    —     —    —     —     —     —     (17,497)  (17,497)   —      —      —     —      —      —      (17,497  (17,497

Purchase of 1,956,168 treasury shares under stock repurchase program and surrender of 106,446 shares upon restricted stock vesting

  —    —     —    —     —     (45,107)  —     —     (45,107)   —      —      —     —      (45,107  —      —      (45,107

Exercise of stock options

  —    126,206   1  882   —     —     —     —     883    —      126,206    1   882    —      —      —      883  

Tax impact of exercise of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock vesting

  —    —     —    (1,126)  —     —     —     —     (1,126)   —      —      —     (1,126  —      —      —      (1,126

Stock options assumed in acquisition

  —    —     —    172    —     —     —     172    —      —      —     172    —      —      —      172  

Stock-based compensation

  —      —    11,231   —     —     —     7   11,238    —        —     11,231    —      —      7    11,238  

Restricted stock grants

  —    727,237   —    —     —     —     —     —     —      —      727,237    —     —      —      —      —      —    

Restricted stock cancellations

  —    (35,037)  —    —     —     —     —     —     —      —      (35,037  —     —      —      —      —      —    

Translation adjustment, net of tax

  (1,036) —     —    —     —     —     (1,036)  —     (1,036)   (1,036  —      —     —      —      (1,036  —      (1,036
         

Comprehensive income

 $28,842           $28,842           

Balance at December 31, 2008

   51,269,081  $51 $116,846  $—    $(130,594) $(899) $105,104  $90,508       51,269,081   $51  $116,846   $(130,594 $(899 $105,104   $90,508  

Net income

  $28,447    —      —     —      —      —      28,447    28,447  

Payment of dividends

   —      —      —     —      —      —      (17,673  (17,673

Surrender of 182,875 shares upon restricted stock vesting and stock appreciation right exercise

   —      —      —     —      (3,788  —      —      (3,788

Issuance of common stock

   —      55,661    —     1,215    —      —      —      1,215  

Exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights

   —      451,580    1   2,509    —      —      —      2,510  

Tax impact of exercise of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock vesting

   —      —      —     2,290    —      —      —      2,290  

Stock-based compensation

   —      —      —     11,417    —      —      33    11,450  

Restricted stock grants

   —      492,964    —     449    —      —      —      449  

Restricted stock cancellations

   —      (54,680  —     —      —      —      —      —    

Translation adjustment, net of tax

   698    —      —     —      —      698    —      698  
     

Comprehensive income

  $29,145           

Balance at December 31, 2009

      52,214,606   $52  $134,726   $(134,382 $(201 $115,911   $116,106  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to consolidated financial statements

1. Organization and significant accounting policies

1.Organization and significant accounting policies

Blackbaud, Inc. (the Company) is the leading global provider of software and related services designed specifically for nonprofit organizations, and provides products and services that enable nonprofit organizations to increase donations, reduce fundraising costs, improve communications with constituents, manage their finances and optimize internal operations. As of the end of 2008,2009, the Company had approximately 22,000 active customers distributed across multiple verticals within the nonprofit market including religion, education, foundations, health and human services, arts and cultural, public and societal benefits, environment and animal welfare, and international foreign affairs.

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).

Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company evaluates subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Areas of the financial statements where estimates may have the most significant effect include revenue recognition, the allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts, valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill, stock-based compensation and provision for income taxes and valuation of deferred tax assets. Changes in the facts or circumstances underlying these estimates could result in material changes and actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue recognition

The Company’s revenue is primarily generated primarily byfrom the following sources: (1) selling perpetual licenses orof its software products; (2) providing professional services including implementation, training, consulting, hosting and other services; (3) providing software maintenance and support services; and (4) charging for the use of its software products and providing support, training, consulting, technical and other professional services for those products. The Company makes available certain of its software products for use in a hosted application arrangements without licensing perpetual rights to the software (hosted applications). Additionally, the Company provides hosting services to customers who have purchased perpetual rights to certain of its software products (hosting services). The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with:

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statements of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as modified by SOPs 98-4 and 98-9, as well as Technical Practice Aids issued from time to time by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,

The SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,”

The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-03, “Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements that Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware,”

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.environment.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)License fees

The EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” and

The SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.”

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of perpetual software license rights when all of the following conditions are met:

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, exists;

the product has been delivered, title and risk of loss have transferred to the customers, delivered;

the fee is fixed or determinabledeterminable; and

collection of the resulting receivable is probable.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The Company deems acceptance of an agreement to be evidence of an arrangement. Delivery occurs when the product is shipped or transmitted.transmitted, and title and risk of loss have transferred to the customers. The Company’s typical license agreement does not include customer acceptance provisions; however, if acceptance provisions are provided, delivery is deemed to occur upon acceptance. The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable unless the fee is subject to refund or adjustment or is not payable within the Company’s standard payment terms. The Company considers paymentPayment terms greater than 90 days are considered to be beyond itsthe Company’s customary payment terms. The Company deems collectionCollection is deemed probable if the Company expects that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as they become due. If the Company determines that collection is not probable, the Company postponesit defers revenue recognition of the revenue until collection.

The Company sells software licenses with maintenance, varying levels of professional services and, in certain instances, with hosting services. The Company allocates revenue to delivered components, normally the license component of the arrangement, using the residual value method based on objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements, which is specific to the Company. Fair value for maintenance services associated with software licenses is based upon renewal rates stated in the agreements with customers, which vary according to the level of support service provided under the maintenance program. Fair value of professional services and other products and services is based on sales of these products and services to other customers when sold on a stand-alone basis. Revenue from hosting services associatedWhen a software license is sold with software licensed under perpetual rights is recognized ratably overcustomization services, generally the period services are performed.

For contractual arrangements coveringto provide customer support for assistance in creating special reports and other enhancements that will assist with efforts to improve operational efficiency and/or to support business process improvements. These services are not essential to the use of hosted applications, such as Kintera Sphere, eTapestry and TeamApproach, the stand alone valuefunctionality of the delivered items and fair value of undelivered items insoftware. However, when software customization services are considered essential to the arrangement have not been established. Such items would include upfront activation, implementation and hostingfunctionality of the solution. For these arrangements we treatsoftware, the transaction as a single elementCompany recognizes revenue for both the software license and the revenue is deferred until the hosted application is deployed and in use, at which time revenue is recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement. Revenue from transaction processing fees is recognized when received. Credit card fees directly associated with processing customer donations and billed to customers are netted in revenue in accordance with EITF Issue 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross asservices on a Principal verses Net as an Agent.” Direct and incremental costs relating to activation and implementation are capitalized until the hosted application is deployed and in use, and then expensed over the remaining term of the arrangement.percent-complete basis.

Services

The Company’sCompany generally bills consulting, installation and implementation services are generally billed based on hourly rates plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. Revenue is recognized for these services over the period the services are performed. For small service engagements of less than $10,000, the Company frequently contracts for and bills based on a fixed fee plus reimbursable travel-related expenses. The Company recognizes this revenue upon completion of the work performed. When the Company’s services include software customization, these services are typically provided to support customer requests for assistance in creating special reports and other minor enhancements that will assist with efforts to improve operational efficiency and/or to support business process improvements. These services are not essential to the functionality of the software and rarely exceed three months in duration. The Company recognizes revenue as these services are performed. However, when software customization services are considered essential to the functionality of the software the Company recognizes revenue for both the software license and the services on a percent-complete basis. These fixed-price contracts are generally larger in size and longer in duration.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company recognizes analytic services revenue from donor prospect research engagements, the sale of lists of potential donors, benchmarking studies and data modeling service engagements upon delivery.

The Company sells training at a fixed rate for each specific class, at a per attendee price or at a packaged price for several attendees, and revenue is recognized only upon the customer attending and completing training. Additionally, the Company sells a fixed-rate program, which permits customers to attend unlimited training over a specified contract period, typically one year, subject to certain restrictions, and revenue is recognized ratably over this contract period.

Maintenance

The Company recognizes revenue from maintenance services ratably over the contract term, which is principallytypically one year. Maintenance contracts are at rates that vary according to the level of the maintenance program and are generally renewable annually. Maintenance contracts also include the right to unspecified product upgrades on an if-and-when available basis. Certain support services are sold in prepaid units of time and recognized as revenue upon their usage.

Subscription revenue associated with

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Subscriptions

The Company provides hosting services to customers who have purchased perpetual rights to certain of its software products (hosting services). Revenue from hosting services, as well as data enrichment services, data management services and online training programs and any related set-up fees, areis recognized ratably over the service period of the contract. Any related set-up fees are also recognized ratably over the service period of the contract.

The Company is increasingly making certain of its software products available for use in hosted application arrangements without licensing perpetual rights to the software (hosted applications). Revenue from hosted applications is recognized over the subscription agreement, which generally ranges from one to three years. For contractual arrangements covering the use of hosted applications the stand alone value of the delivered items or the fair value of undelivered items in the arrangement have not been established. Such items include upfront activation, implementation and hosting of the solution. For these arrangements the Company treats the transaction as a single element and the revenue is deferred until the hosted application is deployed and in use, at which time revenue is recognized over the remaining term of the arrangement. Direct and incremental costs relating to activation and implementation are capitalized until the hosted application is deployed and in use, and then expensed over the remaining term of the arrangement.

Revenue from transaction processing fees is recognized when received. Credit card fees directly associated with processing donations for customers are included in subscription revenue, net of related transaction costs.

Deferred revenue

To the extent that the Company’s customers are billed or pay for the above described services in advance of delivery, the Company records such amounts are recorded in deferred revenue.

Sales taxes

SalesThe Company presents sales taxes and other taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis and, as such, are excludedexcludes them from revenues.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Donor restricted cash and donations payable

Restricted cash consists of donations collected by the Company and payable to its customers, net of the associated transaction fees earned. Monies associated with donations payable are segregated in a separate bank account and used exclusively for the payment of donations payable. This usage restriction is internally imposed and reflects the Company’s intention with regard to such deposits.

Property and equipment

PropertyThe Company records property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciateddepreciates them over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Property and equipment subject to capital leases are depreciated over the lesser of the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the asset. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Construction-in-progress represents purchases of computer software and hardware associated with new internal system implementation projects, which had not been placed in service at the respective balance sheet dates.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

These assets are transferred to the applicable property category on the date they are placed in service. There was no capitalized interest applicable to construction-in-processconstruction-in-progress for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.

The Company capitalizes certain costs related to the development or purchase of software for use in the Company’s internal operations. These amounts have been accounted for in accordance with SOP 98-1, “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” Any amounts capitalized are included in computer software costs and amortized over the expected useful life. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements, which will not result in additional functionality, are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the purchase price in excess of the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company primarily as a result of the acquisition of Target Software, Inc. and Target Analysis Group, Inc. (together referred to as the Target Companies), eTapestry.com (referred to as eTapestry) and Kintera, Inc. (referred to as Kintera). Goodwill is allocated to reporting units, which are defined as the Company’s operating segments, and tested annually for impairment under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”impairment. The Company will also test goodwill for impairment between annual impairment tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. NoThere was no impairment of goodwill resulted induring 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.or 2007.

Intangible assets

IntangibleThe Company amortizes intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows.

 

    Basis of amortization  Amortization
period
(in years)

Customer relationships

  Straight-line and accelerated(1)accelerated(1)  4-15

Marketing assets

  Straight-line  3-85-8

Acquired software

  Straight-line  3-104-10

Non-compete agreements

  Straight-line  51-5

Database

  Straight-line  8
(1)Certain of the customer relationships acquired as part of the Kintera acquisition are amortized on an accelerated basis.

The Company evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets periodically and takes into account events or circumstances that warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate an impairment may exist. A substantial portion of the Company’s intangible assets was acquired in business combinations. NoThere was no impairment of intangible assets resulted induring 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.or 2007.

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged between willing parties other than in a forced sale or liquidation. The financial instruments of the Company consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt at December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values at December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

Deferred financing costs

Deferred financing costs included in other assets represent the direct costs of entering into the Company’s revolving credit facility in July 2007 and increasing the available funds under the credit facility in June 2008. These costs are amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method. The deferred financing fees are being amortized over the term of the credit facility.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R). Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Stock-based compensation costs forcost arising from stock options areoption grants is recognized using the accelerated method. Costs forarising from restricted stock and stock appreciation rightsright grants are recognized on a straight-line basis.

Income taxes

Prior to October 13, 1999, the Company was organized as an S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code and, therefore, was not subject to federal income taxes. The Company historically made distributions to its stockholders to cover the stockholders’ anticipated tax liability. In connection with its 1999 recapitalization, the Company converted its U.S. taxable status from an S corporation to a C corporation and, accordingly, since October 14, 1999 has been subject to federal and state income taxes. Upon this conversion and as a result of the recapitalization, the Company recorded a one-time benefit of $107.0 million to establish a deferred tax asset. This amount was recorded as a direct increase to equity in the statements of stockholders’ equity. The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against this item in its deferred tax asset as of December 31, 20082009 or 2007,2008, as the Company believes it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that it will be able to utilize this benefit, which is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income. The amount of deferred tax asset related to this matter at December 31, 2009 was $35.9 million.

The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accountinga new income tax standard for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,” (FIN 48)uncertain tax positions on January 1, 2007. Under FIN 48 the2007 under which a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position must beis recognized only if it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a positionpositions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. Penalties and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in the provision for income taxes. The disclosure requirements and cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 are presented in Note 10.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. The Company records its tax provision at the anticipated tax rates based on estimates of annual pretax income. To the extent that the final results differ from these estimated amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made and could have an impact on the deferred tax asset. The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at an amount based upon a U.S. federal income tax rate of 35.0% and appropriate statutory rates of various foreign, state and local jurisdictions in which the Company operates. If the Company’s tax rates change, the deferred tax assets and liabilities maywill be adjusted to an amount reflecting those income tax rates. If such change is determined to be appropriate, it will affect the provision for income taxes during the period that the determination is made.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company assesses the likelihood that the netits deferred tax assetassets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance is established. To the extent a valuation allowance is established, the Company includes an expense within the income tax provision. ExceptThe Company’s valuation allowance of $8.0 million at December 31, 2009 was primarily associated with respect to deferred tax assets associated withfor certain

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

state income tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards the Companythat it has determined are not recorded a valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 and 2007.more-likely-than-not to be realized. The Company will continue to evaluate the realizability of the remaining state incomedeferred tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards,assets, and any further adjustment to the valuation allowance will be made in the period the Company determines it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that any of the remaining amounts will not be utilized.

Foreign currency

Net assets recorded in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income net of tax.

Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions denominated in currency other than the functional currency are recorded at the approximate rate of exchange at the transaction date. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, the Company recorded net foreign currency lossesgain of $211,000, $503,000$0.2 million, loss of $0.2 million and $214,000,loss of $0.5 million, respectively, asand these amounts are included in other expense, net.

Research and development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. TheyThese costs include salaries and related human resource costs, third-party contractor expenses, software development tools, an allocation of facilities and depreciation expenses and other expenses in developing new products and upgrading and enhancing existing products.

Software development costs

Software development costs have been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed.” Under the standard, capitalizationCapitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility, subject to net realizable value considerations. To date, the period betweenpoint in time of achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has substantially coincided; therefore, software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been immaterial. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs and has charged all such costs to research and development expense.

Sales returns and allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company provides customers a 30-day right of return and maintains a reserve for returns which is estimated based on several factors including historical experience and existing economic conditions. Provisions for sales returns are charged against the related revenue items.

In addition, the Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts that reflects estimates of probable credit losses. This assessment is based on several factors including aging of customer accounts, known customer specific risks, historical experience and existing economic conditions. Accounts are charged against the allowance after all means of collection are exhausted and recovery is considered remote. Provisions for doubtful accounts are recorded in general and administrative expense.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

Below is a summary of the changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands)

  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Acquired
through
business
combinations
  Provision/
adjustment
 Write-off Balance
at end
of year
  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Acquired
through
business
combinations
  Provision/
adjustment
 Write-off Balance
at end
of year

2009

  $1,013  $—    $(47 $(206 $760

2008

  $308  $268  $560  $(123) $1,013   308   268   560    (123  1,013

2007

   335   57   (14)  (70)  308   335   57   (14  (70  308

2006

   342   —     130   (137)  335

Below is a summary of the changes in the Company’s allowance for sales returns.

 

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands)

  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Acquired
through
business
combinations
  Provision/
adjustment
  Write-off Balance
at end
of year
  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Acquired
through
business
combinations
  Provision/
adjustment
  Write-off Balance
at end
of year

2009

  $1,764  $—    $3,505  $(2,470 $2,799

2008

  $1,627  $61  $3,619  $(3,543) $1,764   1,627   61   3,619   (3,543  1,764

2007

   933   95   2,675   (2,076)  1,627   933   95   2,675   (2,076  1,627

2006

   758   —     1,584   (1,409)  933

Sales commissions

As of October 1, 2006, theThe Company pays sales commissions at the time contracts with customers are signed or shortly thereafter, depending on the size and duration of the sales contract. To the extent that these commissions relate to revenue not yet recognized, thesethe amounts are recorded as deferred sales commission costs. Subsequently, the commissions are recognized as expense as the revenue is recognized.

Below is a summary of the changes in the Company’s deferred sales commission costs included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

 

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands)

  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Expense  Balance
at end
of year

2008

  $1,903  $5,699  $(4,555) $3,047

2007

   588   5,335   (4,020)  1,903

2006

   —     750   (162)  588

During the period July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006, the Company paid commissions as the associated revenue was recognized and, accordingly, no deferred sales commission was recorded.

Years ended December 31,

(in thousands)

  Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Expense  Balance
at end
of year

2009

  $3,047  $6,994  $(4,028 $6,013

2008

   1,903   5,699   (4,555  3,047

2007

   588   5,335   (4,020  1,903

Advertising costs

AdvertisingThe Company expenses advertising costs are expensed as incurred, andwhich were $1.1 million, $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.6$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of its property and equipment and other long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” The

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events change or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flow method is used to determine whether the asset is impaired. No impairment of long-lived assets resulted in 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.or 2007.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Shipping and handling

ShippingThe Company expenses shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and includedincludes them in cost of other revenue. The reimbursement of these costs by the Company’s customers is included in other revenue.

Earnings per share

BasicThe Company computes basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares then outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, shares of non-vested restricted stock and settlement of stock appreciation rights and certain contingent liabilities that will be paid in shares of common stock.

Diluted earnings per share for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 do not include the effect of 488,282 and 496,945 potential common share equivalents, respectively, as they are anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive common share equivalents for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.2007.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31,
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  2008  2007  2006   2009  2008  2007

Numerator:

            

Net income

  $29,878  $31,724  $30,153   $28,447  $29,878  $31,724

Denominator:

            

Weighted average common shares

   42,958,947   43,619,158   43,320,096    42,771,173   42,958,947   43,619,158

Add effect of dilutive securities:

            

Employee stock-based compensation

   999,610   976,325   1,348,380    828,875   999,610   976,325
         

Weighted average common shares assuming dilution

   43,958,557   44,595,483   44,668,476    43,600,048   43,958,557   44,595,483
         

Earnings per share:

            

Basic

  $0.70  $0.73  $0.70   $0.67  $0.70  $0.73

Diluted

  $0.68  $0.71  $0.68   $0.65  $0.68  $0.71

NewRecently adopted accounting pronouncements

In September 2006,June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157),theFASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issuedAccounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2), which delays the effective

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair valuebe applied in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The ASC is not intended to change U.S. GAAP, but significantly changes the way in which the accounting literature is organized and the way U.S. GAAP is referenced by companies in their financial statements and accounting policies. The ASC became effective in the third quarter of 2009. The adoption of the ASC did not have an impact on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 partially defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Further, in October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, which provides clarifying guidance on valuing securities in markets that are not active. Except as permitted in FSP 157-2,Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisition of Kintera, the Company acquired marketable securities and long-term debt which are subject to SFAS No. 157. The marketable securities were redeemed or sold prior to December 31, 2008. The Company has included the disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 157 for the long-term debt assumed from Kintera. The major categories of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, for which the Company has not yet applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157, include goodwill and long-lived assets subject to impairment tests under SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. The Company does not expect the further adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2009 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issuedASC 805 (formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007)), “Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141R)(ASC 805). SFAS No. 141RASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141RASC 805 also establishesestablished disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141RASC 805 applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period after December 15, 2008. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 141R, there will not be a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. The Company expects the adoption of SFAS No. 141R will have an impact on the accounting of future business combinations.January 1, 2009. The extent of the impact of SFAS No. 141(R)ASC 805 on future acquisitions is largely dependent upondepends on the size and nature of the acquisitions.

In April 2008, At the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determinationtime of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 removes the requirement of SFAS No. 142 for an entity to consider, when determining the useful life of an acquired intangible asset, whether the intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost or material modifications to the existing terms and conditions associated with the intangible asset. FSP FAS 142-3 replaces the previous useful-life assessment criteria with a requirement that an entity consider its own experience in renewing similar arrangements. If the entity has no relevant experience, it would consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset applies to such assets acquired after the effective date, and the disclosure requirements apply to all intangible assets recognized as of and subsequent to the effective date. The Company doesadoption on January 1, 2009, ASC 805 did not expect FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company expensed acquisition related costs of $0.2 million that prior to the adoption of ASC 805 would have been included in the cost of the acquisition.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB released Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, which amends the existing criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. Arrangements that include perpetual software licenses are excluded from the scope of this ASU. ASU 2009-13 establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and requires the use of best estimate of the selling price when VSOE or third party evidence (TPE) of the selling price cannot be determined. As a result of the requirement to use the best estimate of the selling price when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence of the selling price cannot be determined, the residual method will no longer be permitted. ASU 2009-13 is applicable prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date or retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2009-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008,

2.Business combinations

RLC

On April 29, 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments GrantedCompany acquired all of the outstanding stock of RLC Customer Centric Technology B.V. (RLC), a privately held limited liability company based in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rightsthe Netherlands, for €1.8 million in cash, or the equivalent of $2.4 million based on the foreign exchange rate at the time of the acquisition. The Company will also pay a maximum of €400,000, or the equivalent of $0.5 million based on the foreign exchange rate at the time of the acquisition, in earn-out payments if RLC meets revenue and EBITDA margin targets, as defined in the agreement, over the two years subsequent to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) participating securitiesthe acquisition. RLC is a leading provider of software and should beservices to nonprofits in the Netherlands. The acquisition of RLC provides the Company with a foundation to expand into the Netherlands and other Western European markets. The results of operations of RLC are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.statements of the Company from the date of acquisition. During 2009, total revenue from the RLC operations was $1.7 million and cost of revenue was $0.9 million.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

2. Business combinationsThe Company recorded the purchase price allocation based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price:

(in thousands)     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $110  

Accounts receivable

   374  

Other assets, current and noncurrent

   165  

Property and equipment

   188  

Intangibles

   840  

Goodwill

   1,610  

Trade accounts payable

   (118

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   (179

Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent

   (200

Deferred tax liability, current and noncurrent

   (214

Contingent consideration liability

   (208
     
   $2,368  

None of the goodwill arising in the acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. Goodwill was assigned to the license fees, consulting and education services, subscriptions and maintenance reportable segments. The recognition of goodwill was principally attributable to a trained workforce and the integration of the Company’s technology and products with RLC’s operations which were considered in the purchase price. The acquisition resulted in the identification of $0.8 million of intangible assets, all of which are subject to amortization on a straight-line basis. A liability of $0.2 million was recognized for contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow valuation technique. Any change in the fair value, or any change upon final settlement, of the contingent consideration liability will be recognized in income from operations.

Kintera

On July 8, 2008, the Company acquired Kintera, a publicly-traded company based in San Diego, California. Kintera is a leader in providing web-based, software-as-a-service solutions to the nonprofit market. The acquisition of Kintera adds experienceprovides the Company with additional expertise in developing and delivering on-demand solutions and expands the Company’s online offerings. The Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Kintera through a tender offer, paying $1.12 per share for a total of $45,660,000.$45.7 million. The Company financed this acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The total purchase price of $50.2 million includes $2.4 million in payments to Kintera management under change of control provisions, $1.9 million of direct acquisition-related costs and $0.2 million related to Kintera employee stock options assumed. The results of operations of Kintera are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The purchase price allocation is based on a valuation. The following table summarizes the allocationvaluation of the purchase price to the estimated fair valuesvalue of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Kintera:Kintera. The following table summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price:

 

(in thousands)          

Cash and cash equivalents

  $2,980   $2,980  

Accounts receivable

   4,479    4,479  

Marketable securities

   1,575    1,575  

Other assets, current and noncurrent

   9,428    9,428  

Deferred tax assets, current and noncurrent

   24,530    26,420  

Property and equipment

   3,834    3,834  

Intangible assets

   16,950    16,950  

Goodwill

   13,148    11,506  

Trade accounts payable

   (1,043)   (1,061

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   (14,865)   (15,095

Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent

   (7,871)   (7,871

Debt, current and noncurrent

   (2,973)   (2,973
        

Total purchase price

  $50,172   $50,172  

None of the goodwill arising in the acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. All segments were allocated a portion of the goodwill. The acquisition resulted in the identification of $16.9 million of intangible assets, all of which are subject to amortization. The following table presents the amounts assigned to each intangible asset class:

    

Intangible

assets
acquired

(in thousands)

  

Weighted

average

amortization

period

(in years)

Marketing assets

  $740  8.0

Customer relationships

   12,100  10.8

Software

   4,110  7.4
    

Total

  $16,950  9.8

Customer relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis. Marketing assets and software are amortized on a straight-line basis. The following table presents the amounts assigned to each intangible asset class:

    Intangible
assets
acquired
(in thousands)
  

Weighted
average
amortization
period

(in years)

 

Marketing assets

  $740  8.0 

Customer relationships

   12,100  10.8 

Software

   4,110  7.4 
     

Total

  $16,950  9.8 

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into employment agreements with fourcertain members of Kintera’s management team that includeprovided for the payment of bonuses totaling up to $449,000, payable in shares of the Company’s common stock in February 2009 if they are still employees at that time.based on continued employment. In February 2009, the Company issued 39,140 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $11.47 per share in connection with these employment agreements. In addition, the Company entered into an employment agreement with the former CEO of Kintera that includesincluded a targeted bonus of $330,000, payable in shares of the Company’s common stock in July 2009 conditioned upon his continued employment and achievement of certain performance targets. As of December 31, 2008,In August 2009, the Company had accrued $595,000issued 10,898 shares of compensation costcommon stock at a fair market value of $19.73 per share in connection with thesethis bonus arrangements.arrangement.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

eTapestry

On August 1, 2007, the Company acquired eTapestry, a privately-owned company based near Indianapolis, Indiana. eTapestry is thea provider of an on-demand donor management and fundraising solution. The acquisition of eTapestry allows the Company to address a broader market opportunity by providing an on-demand solution that is suited for smaller organizations interested in a relatively low-cost offering and mid-sized nonprofits interested in a stand-alone fundraising solution deployed in an on-demand model. The Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of eTapestry for approximately $25.4 million in a cash transaction financed by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The results of operations of eTapestry are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition.

At the acquisition date, an additional amount of up to $1.5 million is contingently payable to certain eTapestry employees under a stock-based incentive arrangement based upon performance of the acquired business over the two years subsequent to the acquisition. For the twelve month period ending September 30, 2008 (Year 1), the amount is not to exceed $0.5 million, and for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2009 (Year 2) the amount is not to exceed $1.0 million. Based on performance achieved for Year 1 under these arrangements, the Company issued 42,262 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $11.83. Based on actual and expected performance for Year 2, the Company accrued, as of December 31, 2008, a liability of $250,000. As a result, $750,000 of stock-based compensation expense was recorded during 2008 related to these arrangements. The Company remains contingently liable for $750,000 for Year 2 performance.

The allocation of the purchase price is based on a valuation. The following table summarizes the allocationvaluation of the purchase price to the estimated fair valuesvalue of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of eTapestry:eTapestry. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price:

 

(in thousands)     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $308 

Accounts receivable

   1,095 

Other current assets

   21 

Property and equipment

   720 

Intangible assets

   10,450 

Goodwill

   18,428 

Trade accounts payable

   (137)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   (304)

Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent

   (3,087)

Other liabilities, noncurrent

   (39)

Net deferred tax liabilities, noncurrent

   (2,026)
     

Total purchase price

  $25,429 

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(in thousands)     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $308  

Accounts receivable

   1,095  

Other current assets

   21  

Property and equipment

   720  

Intangible assets

   10,450  

Goodwill

   18,428  

Trade accounts payable

   (137

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   (304

Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent

   (3,087

Other liabilities, noncurrent

   (39

Net deferred tax liabilities, noncurrent

   (2,026
     

Total purchase price

   $25,429  

None of the goodwill arising in the acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill was principally allocated to the Subscriptionssubscriptions and Consultingconsulting and Education Serviceseducation services reportable segments. The acquisition resulted in the identification of $10.5 million of intangible assets, all of which are subject to amortization. The following table presents the amounts assigned to each intangible asset class:

 

  

Intangible
assets
acquired

(in thousands)

  

Weighted
average
amortization
period

(in years)

   Intangible
assets
acquired
(in thousands)
  Weighted
average
amortization
period
(in years)

Customer relationships

  $6,100  10.0   $6,100  10.0

Acquired software

   2,790  7.0    2,790  7.0

Marketing assets

   560  7.0    560  7.0

Non-compete agreements

   1,000  5.0    1,000  5.0
         

Total

  $10,450  8.6   $10,450  8.6

In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into employment agreements with certain members of eTapestry’s management team. Under these arrangements, an additional amount of up to $1.5 million was payable based upon performance of the acquired business for the two twelve-month periods ending September 30, 2009. Based on actual performance, the Company issued 44,763 shares of common stock at a fair

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

market value of $22.34 and 42,262 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $11.83 during 2009 and 2008, respectively, under these employment agreements.

Target Companies

On January 16, 2007, the Company acquired the Target Companies, privately-owned affiliated companies based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The acquired companies provide solutions that help organizations analyze, plan, forecast, execute, and manage high-volume fundraising campaigns while simultaneously helping them maintain long-term constituent relationships. The acquisition of the Target Companies significantly advances the Company’s strategic goal of providing a more complete set of solutions that meet both the fundraising and direct marketing needs of the nonprofit market. The Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of the Target Companies for approximately $58.7 million, including direct acquisition-related costs, in an all cash transaction that was financed by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The results of operations of the Target Companies are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition.

At the acquisition date, an additional amount of up to $2.4 million was contingently payable to the sellers under an earn-out arrangement based upon performance of the acquired businesses over the year subsequent to the acquisition. In March 2008, the Company paid $2.3 million of contingent consideration in cash, which was recorded as an additional acquisition costscost and increased the balance of goodwill. There is no further obligation in connection with the Target acquisition.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The allocation of the purchase price is based on a valuation. The following table summarizes the allocationvaluation of the purchase price to the estimated fair valuesvalue of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of the Target Companies asCompanies. The following table summarizes the allocation of the acquisition date:purchase price:

 

(in thousands)     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $507  

Accounts receivable

   5,067  

Other current assets

   278  

Property and equipment

   2,291  

Deferred tax assets

   738  

Intangible assets

   22,323  

Goodwill

   36,453  

Trade accounts payable

   (445

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   (3,243

Deferred revenue, current and noncurrent

   (1,807

Loans from shareholders, current

   (1,919

Capital lease obligations, current and noncurrent

   (1,510
     

Total purchase price

  $58,733  

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Of the total amount of goodwill arising in the acquisition, $35.8 million is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. All reportable segments were allocated a portion of the goodwill. The acquisition resulted in the identification of $22.3 million of intangible assets, all of which are subject to amortization. The following table presents the amounts assigned to each intangible asset class:

 

  Intangible
assets
acquired
(in thousands)
  

Weighted
average
amortization
period

(in years)

   Intangible
assets
acquired
(in thousands)
  Weighted
average
amortization
period
(in years)

Customer relationships

  $13,627  12.7   $13,627  12.7

Acquired software

   3,655  10.0    3,655  10.0

Database

   3,441  8.0    3,441  8.0

Marketing assets

   800  5.0    800  5.0

Non-compete agreements

   800  5.0    800  5.0
         

Total

  $22,323  11.0   $22,323  11.0

Pro forma information (unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company as if the acquisition of Kintera, eTapestry and the Target Companies had taken place at the beginning of 2008 andJanuary 1, 2007. The pro forma information includes the historical operating results of the acquired companies and adjustments for the business combination effect of the amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, interest expense, interest income and related tax effects. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations.

    Years ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)  2008  2007

Revenue

  $322,073  $307,902

Net income

  $22,728  $18,942

Earnings per share, basic

  $0.55  $0.43

Earnings per share, diluted

  $0.53  $0.42

Index The results of operations of RLC were not material to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the Company’s consolidated results of operations, of the Company as if the acquisition of eTapestry and the Target Companies had taken place at the beginning of 2007 and 2006. The pro formathus pro-forma financial information includes the historical operating results of the acquired companies and adjustments for the business combination effect of the amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, interest expense, interest income and related tax effects. The pro forma information doesis not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations.presented.

 

    Years ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)  2007  2006

Revenue

  $262,967  $219,580

Net income

  $31,949  $25,807

Earnings per share, basic

  $0.71  $0.59

Earnings per share, diluted

  $0.69  $0.58

Campagne

On January 20, 2006, the Company acquired Campagne Associates, Ltd. (Campagne), the New Hampshire-based provider of GiftMaker Protm fundraising software, for approximately $6.1 million. This acquisition allows the Company to offer its products to a larger customer base and use the combined experience of the two companies to deliver software solutions to meet customers’ needs. At the date of acquisition, the Company agreed to pay additional contingent consideration of up to $2.5 million based upon performance of the acquired business over the two years subsequent to the acquisition. During 2007, an additional payment of $1.0 was made, and on April 21, 2008, the Company made the final payment of contingent consideration of $0.6 million. The total contingent consideration paid of $1.6 million was recorded as an increase in goodwill. There is no further obligation in connection with the acquisition of Campagne. The results of Campagne’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.

        Years ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)    2008  2007

Revenue

  $322,073  $307,902

Net income

  $22,728  $18,942

Earnings per share, basic

  $0.55  $0.43

Earnings per share, diluted

  $0.53  $0.42

3. Property and equipment

Property and equipment as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 consisted of the following:

 

    Estimated
useful life
(years)
  December 31, 
(in thousands)    2008  2007 

Equipment

  3 - 5  $5,824  $5,858 

Computer hardware

  3 - 5   29,448   21,570 

Computer software

  3 - 5   11,903   8,005 

Construction in progress

  —     357   2,642 

Furniture and fixtures

  5 - 7   5,229   4,695 

Leasehold improvements

  term of lease   2,419   1,310 
       

Total property and equipment

     55,180   44,080 

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (33,796)  (27,118)
       

Property and equipment, net of depreciation

     $21,384  $16,962 

Depreciation expense was $6.9 million, $4.7 million and $3.0 million for December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

    Estimated
useful life
(years)
  December 31, 
(in thousands)    2009  2008 

Equipment

  3 - 5  $5,323  $5,824 

Computer hardware

  3 - 5   25,850   29,448 

Computer software

  3 - 5   11,166   11,903 

Construction in progress

  —     5,960   357 

Furniture and fixtures

  5 - 7   4,891   5,229 

Leasehold improvements

  term of lease   2,641   2,419 
           

Total property and equipment

     55,831   55,180 

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (33,324  (33,796
           

Property and equipment, net of depreciation

     $22,507  $21,384 

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

Depreciation expense was $8.4 million, $6.9 million and $4.7 million for December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Property and equipment at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007, includesincluded the following amounts for assets under capital leases:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008 2007   2009 2008 

Equipment

  $50  $—     $50  $50 

Computer hardware

   1,185   1,166    1,185   1,185 

Computer software

   255   255    255   255 
          

Total property and equipment under capital leases

   1,490   1,421    1,490   1,490 

Less: accumulated depreciation

   (1,054)  (478)   (1,407  (1,054
          

Property and equipment under capital leases, net of depreciation

  $436  $943   $83  $436  

4. Goodwill and other intangible assets

4.Goodwill and other intangible assets

The change in goodwill for each reportable segment during the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 consisted of the following:

 

(in thousands)       License
fees
 Consulting
and education
services
 Analytic
services
 Maintenance Subscriptions Total 

Balance at December 31, 2006

  $2,518 

Additions related to business combinations

   54,881 

Payment of contingent consideration

   844 

Effect of foreign currency translation

   32 
    

Balance at December 31, 2007

   58,275   $1,350   $13,405   $13,721   $6,009   $23,790   $58,275  

Additions related to business combinations

   13,148    86    567    182    2,497    9,816    13,148  

Payment of contingent consideration

   2,895    137    634    879    511    734    2,895  

Effect of foreign currency translation

   (703)   (144  (174  (16  (363  (6  (703
         

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $73,615    1,429    14,432    14,766    8,654    34,334    73,615  

Additions related to business combinations

   23    627    —      587    373    1,610  

Adjustments related to prior year businsess combinations

   3    10    11    42    182    248  

Subsequent recognition of deferred tax assets

   (20  (78  (87  (323  (1,382  (1,890

Effect of foreign currency translation

   32    138    4    125    37    336  
     

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $1,467   $15,129   $14,694   $9,085   $33,544   $73,919  

The Company has no accumulated impairment losses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Additions to goodwill during the year ended December 31, 20082009 related to the acquisition of KinteraRLC as described in Note 2 of these consolidated financial statements. Goodwill also increasedThe Company finalized the purchase price allocation for Kintera during 2009, which resulted in a net decrease to goodwill of $1.6 million. The adjustments to the year ended December 31, 2008 due to payments of contingent considerationpurchase price allocation primarily related to (i) the acquisitionsrecognition of $1.9 million of additional deferred tax assets, (ii) the Target Companiesrecognition of a current tax benefit of $0.8 million and Campagne.(iii) an increase in contingent tax liabilities, royalties and other preacquisition accruals of $1.1 million.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

The Company has recorded intangible assets acquired in various business combinations based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The table below sets forth the balances of each class of intangible asset, all of which are subject to amortization, as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008 2007   2009 2008 

Gross carrying amount

      

Customer relationships

  $39,607  $27,571   $39,975   $39,607  

Marketing assets

   2,124   1,384    2,232    2,124  

Acquired software

   11,045   6,935    11,489    11,045  

Non-compete agreements

   2,100   2,100    2,111    2,100  

Database

   3,441   3,441    3,441    3,441  
          

Total gross carrying amount

   58,317   41,431    59,248    58,317  
          

Accumulated amortization

      

Customer relationships

   (5,984)  (2,363)   (10,465  (5,984

Marketing assets

   (496)  (203)   (843  (496

Acquired software

   (2,052)  (829)   (3,454  (2,052

Non-compete agreements

   (772)  (352)   (1,195  (772

Database

   (842)  (412)   (1,272  (842
          

Total accumulated amortization

   (10,146)  (4,159)   (17,229  (10,146
          

Total intangible assets, net

  $48,171  $37,272   $42,019   $48,171  

Additions to intangible assets subject to amortization during 20082009 are related to the acquisition of KinteraRLC as described in Note 2 of these consolidated financial statements.

Amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in business combinations is allocated to cost of revenue on the statements of operations based on the revenue stream to which the asset contributes. The following table summarizes amortization expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)  2008  2007  2006   2009  2008  2007

Included in cost of revenue:

            

Cost of license fees

  $246  $153  $—     $362  $246  $153

Cost of services

   1,338   1,178   —      1,344   1,338   1,178

Cost of maintenance

   895   406   —      1,302   895   406

Cost of subscriptions

   2,694   1,112   —      3,239   2,694   1,112

Cost of other revenue

   75   96   —      75   75   96
         

Total included in cost of revenue

   5,248   2,945   —      6,322   5,248   2,945

Included in operating expenses

   713   491   699    768   713   491
         

Total

  $5,961  $3,436  $699   $7,090  $5,961  $3,436

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

The following table outlines the estimated future amortization expense for each of the next five years for acquisition-related intangible assets as of December 31, 2008:2009:

 

  

Amortization

expense

Years ended December 31,  

Amortization
expense

(in thousands)

  (in thousands)

2009

  $7,023

2010

   6,690  $6,787

2011

   6,255   6,348

2012

   5,734   5,477

2013

   4,790   4,883

2014

   4,572
      

Total

  $30,492  $28,067

5. Prepaid expenses and other current assets

5.Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

 

  December 31,   December 31,
(in thousands)  2008  2007   2009  2008

Deferred sales commissions

  $6,013  $3,047

Prepaid software maintenance and royalties

   4,694   3,904

Taxes, prepaid and receivable

  $6,385  $5,547    3,736   6,385

Prepaid software maintenance and royalties

   3,904   2,131 

Deferred sales commissions

   3,047   1,903 

Other

   3,945   1,698    3,712   3,945
         

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $17,281  $11,279   $18,155  $17,281

6. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

6.Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

 

  December 31,   December 31,
(in thousands)  2008  2007   2009  2008

Accrued bonuses

  $6,905  $6,566   $8,699  $6,905

Accrued commissions and salaries

   3,703   2,967    3,800   3,703

Customer credit balances

   3,028   1,588    3,536   3,028

Taxes payable

   2,033   3,306    3,196   2,033

Accrued health care costs

   1,394   758

Accrued accounting and legal fees

   1,283   1,766    1,124   1,283

Accrued health care costs

   758   1,094 

Other

   4,048   3,288    4,225   4,432
         

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $21,758  $20,575   $25,974  $22,142

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

7. Deferred revenue

7.Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue consisted of the following as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008 2007   2009 2008 

Maintenance

  $70,616  $62,208   $76,651  $70,616 

Subscriptions

   23,588   11,957    31,130   23,588 

Services

   24,291   21,661    26,019   24,291 

License fees and other

   1,145   274    1,784   1,145 
          

Total deferred revenue

   119,640   96,100    135,584   119,640 

Less: Long-term portion of deferred revenue

   (5,838)  (2,994)   (6,172  (5,838
          

Current portion of deferred revenue

  $113,802  $93,106   $129,412  $113,802 

8. Debt

8.Debt

Revolving credit facility

On July 25, 2007, theThe Company entered intohas a five-year $75.0 million revolving credit facility.facility, which expires July 2012. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may elect not more than twice over the term of the agreement to increase the amount available under the facility for an aggregate amount of up to $50.0 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. In June 2008, the Company exercised one of its options and increased the credit facility by $15.0 million to an aggregate available amount of $90.0 million. The new revolving credit facility has a term of five years, is guaranteed by the material domestic subsidiaries and is collateralized with the stock of all of the Company’s subsidiaries. At December 31, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.

Amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a variable rate based on (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of up to 0.5% or federal funds rate plus a margin of 0.5% to 1.0% (Base Rate Loans) or (b) LIBOR plus a margin of 1.0% to 1.5% (LIBOR Loans). The actualexact amount of theany margin depends on the nature of the loan and the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. At December 31, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on the credit facility was 2.17%. The Company also pays a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.2%, 0.25% or 0.3% per annum, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The outstanding balance of the previous credit facility on July 25, 2007 of $10.0 million was transferred upon its termination on that date to the new credit facility.

In June 2008, the Company exercised one of its two options to increase the credit facility by $15.0 million to an aggregate available amount of $90.0 million. All principal covenants and financial terms of the facility remained unchanged.

Under the credit facility the Company has the ability to choose either Base Rate Loans or LIBOR Loans. Base rate borrowings have a maturity that is commensurate with the maturity of the credit facility.mature in July 2012. LIBOR Loans can be one, two, three or six month maturities, and we havethe Company has the ability to extend the maturity of these loans by rolling them at their maturity into new loans with the same or longer maturities. The Company evaluates the classification of its debt based on the maturity of individual borrowings and any roll-over of borrowings subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to issuance of the financial statements. At December 31, 2008, outstanding borrowings under the credit facility were $59.0 million, all of which were in the form of short-term LIBOR Loans, and accordingly classified as current liabilities. Borrowings during 2008 of $86.0 million were used for business acquisition purposes and to meet operating needs and $27.0 million were repaid during the year. There were no principle or interest amounts outstanding under the credit facility as of December 31, 2007.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred financing costs

Amortization expense for deferred financing costs was $97,500, $69,000 and $48,000$0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006, respectively. Deferred2007. A portion of the deferred financing costs amortized in 2006 and part of 2007 werewas associated with the previous credit facility. The amortization of deferred financing cost recognized in 20072009, 2008 and 20082007 includes the amortization of cost related to the revolving credit facility entered into in July 2007 and additional fees paid in June 2008 to exercise the Company’s option to increase the available borrowings under the credit facility. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, deferred financing costs totaling $335,000$0.2 million and $386,000,$0.3 million, respectively, are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Note payable

As a result of the acquisition of Kintera, the Company assumed a note payable that Kintera had executed on December 1, 2007 in the amount of $3.2 million for the purchase of computer equipment. The note is collateralized by the underlying computer equipment, bears interest at a rate of 11.34% and has a maturity date of November 30, 2010. The Company recorded the note at its fair value as of the acquisition date, which resulted in an increase of $113,000 in the carrying value. Payments of principal and interest totaling $1.2 million are due in 2009 and $1.1 million in 2010. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the note payable balance was $2.3 million, of which $1.1 million is classified as current.

Using a discounted cash flow technique which incorporates market interest rate with adjustments for duration and risk profile, Based on the short-term nature of the note payable at December 31, 2009, the Company has determined that the fair value of this note payable to be $2.4 million at December 31, 2008.approximates its carrying value.

9. Commitments and contingencies

9.Commitments and contingencies

Leases and related party transactions

The Company currently leases office space and office equipment under operating and capital leases. Total rental expense was $5.7 million, $4.4 million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

In October 2008, the Company renegotiated its existing lease for its headquarters facility withfrom Duck Pond Creek, LLC, which is partially owned by certainLLC. Two current executive officers of the Company and entered intoeach have a new4% ownership interest in Duck Pond Creek, LLC. The lease agreement for the same office space. Under the new agreement, thehas a term of the lease is for fifteen15 years with two five-year renewal options by the Company. The annual base rent of the lease is $3,644,064$3.6 million payable in equal monthly installments. The base rent escalates annually at a rate equal to the change in the consumer price index, as defined in the agreement, but not to exceed 5.5% in any year. In addition, under the terms of the lease, the lessor will reimburse the Company an aggregate amount of $4.0 million for leasehold improvements, which will be recorded as a reduction to rent expense ratably over the term of the lease. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, rent expense was reduced by $66,700$0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to these reimbursements.this lease provision. There were no such amounts recorded during the year ended December 31, 2007 since this lease provision became effective under renegotiated lease terms in October 2008. The $4.0 million leasehold improvement allowance has been included in the table below of operating lease commitments below as a reduction in itsthe Company’s lease commitments ratably over the then remaining life of the lease.lease from October 2008. The timing of the reimbursements for the actual leasehold improvements may vary from the amount reflected in the table below.

Additionally, the Company has subleased a portion of its headquarters facility under various agreements extending through 2010.2011. Under these agreements, rent expense was reduced by $354,000, $381,000$0.2 million, $0.4 million and $484,000$0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively. The operating lease commitments in the table below have been reduced by minimum aggregate sublease commitments of $187,000

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

$0.2 million and $62,000$0.1 million during 20092010 and 2010,2011, respectively. No minimum aggregate sublease commitments exist after 2010.2011. The Company has also received, and expects to receive through 2012, quarterly South Carolina state incentive payments as a result of locating its headquarters facility in Berkeley County, South Carolina. These amounts are recorded as a reduction of rent expense and were $1.7 million, $1.8 million $1.9 million and $2.2$1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

Additionally, the Company leases various office space and equipment under operating leases. The Company also has various non-cancelable capital leases for computer equipment and furniture.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2008,2009, the future minimum lease commitments related to lease agreements, net of related sublease commitments and lease incentives, were as follows:

 

Years ending December 31,

(in thousands)

  Operating
leases
  Capital
leases
   Operating
leases
  Capital
leases

2009

  $6,845  $423 

2010

   6,119   174   $6,278  $174

2011

   5,671   40    5,860   40

2012

   5,115   2    5,337   2

2013 and thereafter

   45,411   —   

2013

   4,309   —  

2014 and thereafter

   39,931   —  
         

Total minimum lease payments

  $69,161   639   $61,715   216

Less: portion representing interest

     52      13
           

Present value of net minimum lease payments

     587      203

Less: current maturities

     384      163
           

Long-term maturities

     $203      $40

Other commitments

The Company has a commitment of $200,000 payable annually through 2009 for certain naming rights on a stadium in Charleston, South Carolina. The Company incurred expense under this agreement of $200,000 for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

The Company utilizes third-party relationships in conjunction with its products, with contractual arrangements varying in length from one to three years. In certainsome cases, these arrangements require a minimum annual purchase commitment. The aggregate minimum purchase commitment under these arrangements is approximately $275,000$3.4 million through 2010.2012. The Company incurred expense under these arrangements of $614,000, $808,000$2.4 million, $1.6 million, and $727,000$0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

Legal contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company records an accrual for a contingency when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company does not believe the amount of potential liability with respect to these actions will have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Guarantees and indemnification obligations

The Company enters into agreements in the ordinary course of business with, among others, customers, vendors and service providers. Pursuant to certain of these agreements the Company has agreed to indemnify the other party for certain matters, such as property damage, personal injury, acts or omissions of the Company, or its employees, agents or representatives, or third-party claims alleging that the activities of its contractual partner pursuant to the contract infringe a patent, trademark or copyright of such third party.

The Company assesses the fair value of its liability on the above indemnities to be immaterial based on historical experience and information known at December 31, 2008.2009.

10. Income taxes

10.Income taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions and foreign jurisdictions including Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and Australia.Netherlands. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for calendar tax years 20042005 through 20072008 and state and foreign income tax examination for various years depending on statutes of limitations of those jurisdictions.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The following summarizes the components of income tax expense:

 

    Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008  2007  2006 

Current provision

  $8,979  $6,490  $6,422 

Deferred provision

   7,350   13,339   11,853 
     

Total provision

  $16,329  $19,829  $18,275 
    Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)  2009  2008  2007

Current taxes:

      

U.S. Federal

  $3,139  $6,862  $5,517

U.S. State and local

   1,359   1,758   525

International

   391   359   448
    

Total current taxes

   4,889   8,979   6,490

Deferred taxes:

      

U.S. Federal

   11,167   6,391   11,120

U.S. State and local

   1,184   959   2,219
    

Total deferred taxes

   12,351   7,350   13,339
    

Total income tax provision

  $17,240  $16,329  $19,829

The following summarizes the components of income before provision for income taxes:

    Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)  2009  2008  2007

U.S.

  $43,991  $44,828  $50,169

International

   1,696   1,379   1,384
    

Income before provision for income taxes

  $45,687  $46,207  $51,553

A reconciliation between the effect of applying the federal statutory rate and the effective income tax rate used to calculate the Company’s income tax provision is as follows:

 

    Years ended December 31, 
    2008  2007  2006 

Statutory federal income tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 34.0% 

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

  4.2  3.9  3.1    

Effect of change in federal income tax rate

  —    —    0.9    

Effect of change in federal income tax rate applied to deferred tax asset

  —    (0.3) (0.3)   

Effect of change in state income tax rate applied to deferred tax asset

  (0.8) —    0.5    

Effect of disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options

  (0.8) (0.3) (0.8)   

Incremental South Carolina credits, net of federal benefit

  (2.8) (1.4) (0.1)   

Change in valuation reserve

  2.7  1.6  0.3    

Effect of federal credits generated

  (0.9) —    —      

Other

  (1.3) —    0.1    
    

Income tax provision effective rate

  35.3% 38.5% 37.7% 

At December 31, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets of $19.8 million for federal net operating loss carryforwards and $3.2 million for state net operating loss carryforwards. A portion of the state net operating loss carryforward has a valuation reserve due to management’s uncertainty on the future ability to use such carryforwards. The Company acquired all of its federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in business acquisitions.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had a federal foreign tax credit carryover of approximately $1.7 million, which will expire between 2014 and 2018. As of December 31, 2008 the Company had state tax credits of approximately $12.6 million, $8.2 million net of tax, which will expire between 2009 and 2023, if unused. These state tax credits had a valuation reserve of approximately $7.6 million, $4.9 million net of tax, as of December 31, 2008.

    Years ended December 31, 
    2009  2008  2007 

Federal statutory rate

  35.0 35.0 35.0

Effect of:

    

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

  4.2   4.2   3.9  

Change in state income tax rate applied to deferred tax asset

  —     (0.8 —    

Disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options

  (0.2 (0.8 (0.3

State credits, net of federal benefit

  (2.1 (2.8 (1.4

Change in valuation reserve

  3.4   2.7   1.6  

Federal credits generated

  (3.0 (0.9 —    

Other

  0.4   (1.3 (0.3
    

Income tax provision effective rate

  37.7 35.3 38.5

Income tax benefit of $2.3 million, expense of $1.1 million benefit of $4.9 million and benefit of $6.1$4.9 million that were attributable to employee stock option transactions and restricted stock vesting, were recorded in stockholders’ equity in 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

The amount of tax allocated to the translation adjustment recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income was a benefit of $0.4 million, an expense of $165,000,$0.2 million and a benefit of $61,000 and expense of $89,000$0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax asset were as follows:

    December 31, 
(in thousands)  2009  2008 

Deferred tax assets relating to:

   

Research and other tax credits

  $10,391   $9,859  

Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards

   19,804    23,007  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   1,294    1,080  

Deferred revenue

   5,911    5,892  

Intangible assets

   35,985    42,596  

Effect of expensing nonqualified stock options and restricted stock

   8,113    7,474  

Other

   2,594    2,092  
     

Total deferred tax assets

   84,092    92,000  

Deferred tax liabilities relating to:

   

Intangible assets

   (8,345  (8,608

Fixed assets

   (3,090  (2,000

Other

   (3,365  (1,907
     

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (14,800  (12,515

Valuation allowance

   (7,994  (7,865
     

Net deferred tax asset

  $61,298   $71,620  

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had a federal foreign tax credit carryover of approximately $1.6 million, which will expire between 2014 and 2006, respectively.2018. As of December 31, 2009 the Company had state tax credits of approximately $8.8 million net of federal tax, which will expire between 2010 and 2024, if unused. These state tax credits had a valuation reserve of approximately $6.4 million net of federal tax, as of December 31, 2009.

The Company acquired all of its federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in business acquisitions. At December 31, 2009, the Company had deferred tax assets of $17.3 million for federal net operating loss carryforwards and $2.5 million for state net operating loss carryforwards. These deferred assets pertain to net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $49.6 million and $47.9 million for federal and state purposes, respectively, at December 31, 2009. These net operating losses carryforwards expire during various tax years through 2029. As a result of the Kintera acquisition, Kintera underwent a change in ownership under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC Sec. 382) on July 8, 2008. On August 1, 2007, as a result of the eTapestry acquisition, eTapestry also underwent a change in ownership under IRC Sec. 382. In general, IRC Sec. 382 places annual limitations on the use of certain tax attributes such as net operating losses and tax credit carryovers in existence at the ownership change date. AsThese limitations restrict the amount of December 31, 2008, approximately $54.5 million and $48.2 millionthe aforementioned net operating loss carryforwards that are available to offset taxable income each year. A portion of U.S. federal andthe state net operating losses, respectively, acquired from Kintera are generally subjectloss carryforward has a valuation reserve due to an annual limitation of approximately $2.4 million and $4.9 million inmanagement’s uncertainty regarding the 2008 and 2009 tax year, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2008, approximately $2.2 million and $5.8 million of U.S. federal and state net operating losses, respectively, acquired from eTapestry are generally subjectfuture ability to an annual limitation of approximately $2.9 million and $2.2 million in the 2008 and 2009 tax year, respectively.use such carryforwards.

The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax asset were as follows:

    December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008  2007 

Deferred tax assets relating to:

   

Research and other tax credits

  $9,859  $9,822 

Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards

   23,007   1,168 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   1,080   696 

Deferred revenue

   5,892   633 

Intangible assets

   42,596   50,644 

Effect of expensing nonqualified stock options and restricted stock

   7,474   2,812 

Other

   2,092   2,161 
     

Total deferred tax assets

   92,000   67,936 

Deferred tax liabilities relating to:

   

Intangible assets

   (8,608)  (4,727)

Fixed assets

   (2,000)  (2,788)

Other

   (1,907)  (2,558)
     

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (12,515)  (10,073)

Valuation allowance

   (7,865)  (3,891)
     

Net deferred tax asset

  $71,620  $53,972 

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

The following table illustrates the change in the Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

 

(in thousands)  Balance at
beginning
of year
  Acquisition
related
increase
  Charges to
expense
  Balance at
end of
year
  Balance at
beginning
of year
  Acquisition
related
change
 

Charges to

expense

  Balance at
end of
year
Years ended December 31,                   

2009

  $7,865  $(1,378 $1,507  $7,994

2008

  $3,891  $2,741  $1,233  $7,865   3,891   2,741    1,233   7,865

2007

   3,147   —     744   3,891   3,147   —      744   3,891

2006

   3,027   —     120   3,147

The following table sets forth the change to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008 2007   2009 2008 2007 

Balance at beginning of year

  $629  $642   $346   $629  $642 

Increases from prior period positions

   —     13    427    —      13 

Decreases from prior period positions

   —     (12)   —      —      (12

Increases from current period positions

   23   8    485    23    8 

Lapse of statute of limitations

   (306)  —      (27  (306  —    

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

   —     (22)   —      —      (22
          

Balance at end of year

  $346  $629   $1,231  $346  $629 

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate was $0.2 million and $0.4$1.1 million, at December 31, 20082009. The Company recognizes accrued interest and 2007, respectively.penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Tax expense for 2009 was increased by $0.9 million for changes in liabilities, penalties and accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. Tax expense for 2008 was decreased by $0.3 million and for 2007 was increased by $25,000, for changes in liabilities, penalties and accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. The total amountsamount of interest and penalties included in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 iswas $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.million. The total amount of interest and penalties included in the consolidated statementsstatement of operations for 2008 iswas $0.1 million.million; interest and penalties were immaterial in 2009.

The Company has taken positions in certain taxing jurisdictions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits maymight significantly decrease within the next twelve months. The possible decrease could result from the finalization of state income tax reviews and the expiration of statutes of limitations. These positions relate to state nexus issues. The reasonably possible decrease is $0.2$0.3 million.

It continues to be the Company’s intention to indefinitely reinvest undistributed foreign earnings. Accordingly, no deferred tax liability has been recorded in connection with the undistributed foreign earnings. It is not practicable for the Company to determine the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries.

Index to Financial Statements

11. Stock-based compensationBlackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

11.Stock-based compensation

Employee stock-based compensation plans

The Company, effective upon the approval of its stockholders on June 18, 2008, adoptedUnder the Blackbaud, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (2008 Equity Plan). Under the 2008 Equity Plan,, the Company may grant incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights, performance stock awards and other stock awards to eligible employees, directors and consultants. The Company has threemaintains other stock-basedstock based compensation plans including the 2004 Stock Plan the 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 19992001 Stock Option Plan, under which no additional grants may be made.made, and the 2009 Equity Compensation Plan for Employees from Acquired Companies, under which the Company may grant shares of its common stock to employees pursuant to employment contracts or other arrangements entered into in connection with past and future acquisitions. In connection with the acquisition of Kintera on July 8, 2008, the Company also maintains the Kintera, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended (Kintera 2000 Plan) and Kintera, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (Kintera 2003 Plan), that it assumed upon the acquisition of Kintera. The Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the plans and the stock-based awards are granted under terms

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

determined by them. The total number of authorized stock-based awards available under the Company’s plans is 5,230,502was 3,888,881 as of December 31, 2008.2009. The Company issues common stock from its pool of authorized stock upon exercise of stock options, settlement of stock appreciation rights or upon granting of restricted stock.

The Company has issued three types of awards under these plans: stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. The following table sets forth the number of awards outstanding for each award type as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.

 

  Outstanding at
December 31,
  Outstanding at
December 31,
Award type  2008  2007  2009  2008

Stock options

  1,527,687  1,582,645  1,091,241  1,526,855

Restricted stock

  1,259,908  899,025  1,206,371  1,259,909

Stock appreciation rights

  1,285,626  710,324  1,764,603  1,285,626

The majority of the stock-based awards granted under these plans have a 10-year contractual term. The option to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock granted on November 28, 2005, to the current Chief Executive Officer (CEO), has a 7-year contractual term. Additionally, stock appreciation rights (SARs), have contractual lives of 5 or 7 years.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The Company recognizes compensation expense associated with options on an accelerated basis consistent with the method of amortization used prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R) over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period. The Company recognizes compensation expense associated with restricted stock and SARs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period.

Stock-based compensation expense is allocated to expense categories on the statements of operations based on the employees’ primary operational function.departmental cost center. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.

 

  Years ended December 31,   Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)  2008  2007  2006   2009  2008  2007

Included in cost of revenue:

            

Cost of services

  $1,442  $627  $531   $1,433  $1,442  $627

Cost of maintenance

   534   234   117    750   534   234

Cost of subscriptions

   283   274   19    387   283   274
         

Total included in cost of revenue

   2,259   1,135   667    2,570   2,259   1,135

Included in operating expenses:

            

Sales and marketing

   1,607   831   813    1,605   1,607   831

Research and development

   2,396   1,219   746    2,944   2,396   1,219

General and administrative

   5,823   3,749   5,174    5,168   5,823   3,749
         

Total included in operating expenses

   9,826   5,799   6,733    9,717   9,826   5,799
         

Total

  $12,085  $6,934  $7,400   $12,287  $12,085  $6,934

The total amount of compensation cost related to non-vested awards not recognized was $29.4$29.3 million at December 31, 2008.2009. This amount will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Stock options

The following table summarizes the options outstanding, vested and unvested under each of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans as of December 31, 2008.2009.

 

Plan  Date of adoption Options
outstanding
  Options
vested
  Options
unvested
  Range of
exercise prices
  Date of adoption Options
outstanding
  Options
vested
  Options
unvested
  Range of
exercise prices

1999 Stock Option Plan

  October 13, 1999  149,375  149,375  —    $4.80

2001 Stock Option Plan

  July 1, 2001  522,762  522,762  —    $4.80-$9.04  July 1, 2001   303,081  303,081  —    $5.40-$9.04

2004 Stock Plan

  March 23, 2004  804,163  604,163  200,000  $8.00-$16.10  March 23, 2004   758,289  758,289  —    $8.00-$16.10

2008 Equity Plan

  June 18, 2008  —    —    —     —  

Kintera 2000 Plan

  July 8, 2008(1) 9,053  9,053  —    $1.16-$19.26  July 8, 2008(1)  6,820  6,820  —    $1.16-$19.26

Kintera 2003 Plan

  July 8, 2008(1) 42,334  14,018  28,316  $10.59-$21.38  July 8, 2008(1)  23,051  18,209  4,842  $10.59-$21.38
        

Total

   1,527,687  1,299,371  228,316      1,091,241  1,086,399  4,842   
(1)In connection with the acquisition of Kintera, wethe Company assumed certain stock options issued and outstanding at the date of acquisition. The amount of options outstanding, vested and unvested represents the number of options assumed.

All options granted under the 1999 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Option Plan are fully vested. The options granted under the 2004 Stock Plan vest in equal annual installments over four years from the grant date, with the exception of certain awards granted

Index to the CEO. Under the 2004 Stock Plan, the Company granted 800,000 optionsFinancial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to the CEO which vests 25% on the first anniversary from the date of grant and the remaining 75% in 12 equal quarterly installments. All of the stock options granted to the CEO are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control of the Company as provided in his employment and stock option agreements.consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

A summary of outstanding options as of December 31, 2008,2009, and changes during the year then ended, is as follows:

 

Options  Share
options
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term

(in years)

  

Aggregate
intrinsic value

(in thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2008

  1,582,645  $10.14    

Exercised

  (126,206)  6.92    

Assumed in business combination

  73,558   11.36    

Forfeited

  (2,310)  9.81    
   

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

  1,527,687  $10.46  4.7  $6,395
   

Expected to vest at December 31, 2008

  1,524,013  $10.45  4.7  $6,393
   

Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2008

  1,299,371  $9.57  4.3  $6,323
Options  Share
options
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term

(in years)

  Aggregate
intrinsic value
(in thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2009

  1,526,855   $10.46    

Exercised

  (434,463  5.77    

Forfeited

  (1,151  12.19    
   

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

  1,091,241   $12.32  2.9  $12,338
   

Unvested and expected to vest at December 31, 2009

  4,659   $11.56  8.3  $56
   

Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2009

  1,086,399   $12.33  2.9  $12,279

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $5.9 million, $1.8 million $14.8 million and $22.0$14.8 million, respectively. The total fair value of options that vested during the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $2.3 million, $2.8 million $3.3 million and $3.7$3.3 million, respectively. All outstanding options granted by the Company had a fair market value assigned at grant date based on the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The assumptions used in the valuation of options are the same as described in the stock appreciation rights section below.

There have been no new stock optionsoption awards granted since 2005. Since the Company has been publicly traded for less than the expected life of the stock options, the expected volatility assumption is determined by calculating the volatility for a number of comparable companies and calculating the average expected volatility over the expected life of the option. The dividend yield is based on the adopted dividend policy in effect at the time of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on United States Treasury rate for a term consistent with the expected life of the awards at the time of grant. The expected life of the option represents the length of time from grant until the option is exercised based on experience.

Restricted stock

The Company has also granted shares of common stock subject to certain restrictions under the 2008 Equity Plan and the 2004 Stock Plan. Restricted stock granted to employees vest in equal annual installments over four years from the grant date. Restricted stock granted to non-employee directors vests after one year.year from the date of grant or, if earlier, immediately prior to the next annual election of directors, provided the non-employee director is serving as a director at that time. Restricted stock granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain members of management are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control of the Company as defined in the employees’ retention agreement. The fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant is amortized on a straight-line basis to expense over the period of vesting. Recipients of restricted stock have the right to vote such shares and receive dividends. Income tax benefits resulting from the vesting of restricted stock are recognized in the period the restrictions lapse to the extent expense has been recognized. Tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation in excess of the related book expense recorded are credited to additional paid-in capital within stockholders’ equity. During 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Company purchased 106,446170,729 and 54,079106,446 shares, respectively, from restricted stockholders upon lapsing of stock restrictions in order for the holders to satisfy personal tax liabilities.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

A summary of unvested restricted stock as of December 31, 2008,2009, and changes during the year then ended, is as follows:

 

Unvested restricted stock  Restricted
stock
 Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
  Restricted
stock
 Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value

Unvested at January 1, 2008

  899,025  $23.63

Unvested at January 1, 2009

  1,259,909  $19.16

Granted

  727,237   14.89  492,964   21.36

Vested

  (331,317)  20.94  (492,432  18.81

Forfeited

  (35,037)  23.66  (54,070  20.63
      

Unvested at December 31, 2008

  1,259,908  $19.29

Unvested at December 31, 2009

  1,206,371  $20.20

As of December 31, 2008,2009, the number and intrinsic value of restricted awards expected to vest is 1,196,689was 1,147,662 and $16.2$27.1 million, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and 2006 was $9.3 million, $6.9 million $4.4 million and $2.8$4.4 million, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $21.36, $14.89 and 2006 was $14.89, $25.80, and $26.04, respectively.

Stock appreciation rights

The Company has granted SARs under the 2008 Equity Plan and the 2004 Stock Plan to certain members of management. The SARs will be settled in stock at the time of exercise and vest three and four years from the date of grant subject to the recipient’s continued employment with the Company. SARs granted to the Company’s executive officers and certain members of management are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control of the Company as defined in the employees’ retention agreement. The number of shares issued upon the

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

exercise of the SARs is calculated as the difference between the share price of the Company’s stock on the date of exercise and the date of grant multiplied by the number of SARs divided by the share price on the exercise date. During 2009, the Company purchased 12,146 shares from SAR holders upon the exercise of SARs in order for the holders to satisfy personal tax liabilities.

A summary of SARs as of December 31, 2008,2009, and changes during the year then ended, is as follows:

 

Stock appreciation rights  Stock
appreciation
rights
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term

(in years)

  

Aggregate
intrinsic value

(in thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2008

  710,324  $25.94    

Granted

  575,302   15.83    

Forfeited

  —     —      
   

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

  1,285,626  $21.41  5.7  $452
   

Expected to vest at December 31, 2008

  1,125,691  $21.02  5.7  $429
   

Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2008

  119,112  $26.11  5.8  $—  
Stock appreciation rights  Stock
appreciation
rights
  Weighted
average
exercise
price
  

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term

(in years)

  

Aggregate
intrinsic value

(in thousands)

Outstanding at January 1, 2009

  1,285,626   $21.40    

Granted

  569,064    22.34    

Exercised

  (17,116  12.40    

Forfeited

  (72,971  21.42    
   

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

  1,764,603   $21.79  5.4  $5,090
   

Unvested and expected to vest at December 31, 2009

  1,221,112   $20.94  5.9  $4,004
   

Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2009

  507,136   $23.94  4.1  $961

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

The total intrinsic value of SARs exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.2 million. There were no SAR exercises prior to 2009. The total fair value of SARs that vested during the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $3.1 million and $1.1 million.million, respectively. Prior to 2008, there were no vested SARs. The weighted average grant date fair value of SARs granted for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $7.38, $5.02 and 2006 was $5.02, $9.17, and $8.19, respectively. All outstanding SARs granted by the Company had a fair market value assigned at the grant date based on the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Significant assumptions used in thatthe Black-Scholes option pricing model for SARs granted in 2009, 2008, 2007 and 20062007 are as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31,
  2008   2007   2006  2009 2008 2007

Volatility

  39% to 44%  42% to 46%  41%  45 39% to 44 42% to 46%

Dividend yield

  1.5% to 1.7%  1.3% to 1.4%  1.1%  1.7 1.5% to 1.7 1.3% to 1.4%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.10% to 3.21%  3.89% to 4.80%  4.64%  1.8 2.10% to 3.21 3.89% to 4.80%

Expected SAR life in years

  4   3 to 4   3     4   4   3 to 4   

The assumptions usedexpected volatility assumption is determined by calculating the volatility for a number of comparable companies and calculating the average expected volatility over the expected life of the SAR. The dividend yield is based on the adopted dividend policy in effect at the valuationtime of SARs aregrant. The risk-free interest rate is based on United States Treasury rate for a term consistent with the same as described inexpected life of the stock option section.SAR at the time of grant. The expected life of the SAR represents the length of time from grant until the SAR is exercised based on experience.

12. Stockholders’ equity

12.Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock

The Company’s Board of Directors may fix the relative rights and preferences of each series of preferred stock in a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Dividends

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a dividend policy which provides for the distribution to stockholders a portion of cash generated by the Company that is in excess of operational needs and capital expenditures. The Company’s credit facility limits the amount of dividends payable and certain state laws restrict the amount of dividends distributed.

The following table provides information with respect to quarterly dividends paid on common stock during the year ended December 31, 2008.2009:

 

Date Declared  Dividend per Share  Record Date  Payable Date

February 5

  $0.10  February 28  March 14

May 7

  $0.10  May 28  June 16

August 4

  $0.10  August 28  September 15

November 3

  $0.10  November 28  December 15
Declaration Date  Dividend per Share  Record Date  Payable Date

February 2009

  $0.10  February 27  March 13

April 2009

  $0.10  May 28  June 15

July 2009

  $0.10  August 28  September 15

October 2009

  $0.10  November 27  December 15

On February 3, 2009,4, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a first quarter dividend of $0.10$0.11 per share payable on March 13,15, 2009 to stockholders of record on February 27, 2009.26, 2010.

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Stock repurchase program

OnIn May 7, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to purchase up to $40.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock. The prior program was terminated at that date and the remaining balance that was authorized but not used was included in the amount authorized under the new program. The new program does not have an expiration date. The shares can be purchased from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending upon market conditions and other factors.

The following table provides information about the shares that were purchased during year ended December 31, 2008.

    Program date  

Shares

repurchased

  

Average

price

  

Cost

(in thousands)

Prior program

  June 13, 2007  1,435,745  $24.03  $34,498

New program

  May 7, 2008  520,423  $17.74   9,229
           

Total

     1,956,168  $22.35  $43,727

The Company accounts for purchases of treasury stock under the cost method, which resulted in an increase to the treasury stock balance of $43.7 million formethod. There were no shares purchased during the year ended December 31, 2008.2009. The remaining amount available to purchase stock under the stock repurchase program was $30.8 million as of December 31, 2008.2009.

In addition toStock surrenders

During the Company’syear ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, restricted stock repurchase plan,and stock appreciation right holders surrendered 182,875 and 106,446 shares of common stock, totaling $3.8 million and $1.4 million, were surrendered by restricted stock holdersrespectively, to satisfy their tax obligations due upon vesting of restricted stock during the year ended December 31, 2008.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and exercise of stock appreciation rights.

Treasury stock

The following table sets forth the changes in treasury stock for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

 

(in thousands, except shares)  Plan date  Shares  Amount  Plan date  Shares  Amount

Balance as of January 1, 2007

    4,743,895  $69,630

Stock purchased in connection with stock repurchase program

  June 13, 2007  633,878   14,386

Stock acquired via surrender of shares of restricted stock to the Company upon vesting for settlement of taxes

    54,079   1,471
     

Balance as of December 31, 2007

    5,431,852   85,487    5,431,852  $85,487

Stock purchased in connection with stock repurchase program

  June 13, 2007  1,435,745   34,498  June 13, 2007  1,435,745   34,498

Stock purchased in connection with stock repurchase program

  May 7, 2008  520,423   9,229  May 7, 2008  520,423   9,229

Stock acquired via surrender of shares of restricted stock to the Company upon vesting for settlement of taxes

    106,446   1,380    106,446   1,380
          

Balance as of December 31, 2008

     7,494,466  $130,594    7,494,466   130,594

Stock acquired via surrender of shares to the Company upon vesting of restricted stock or exercise of stock appreciation rights for settlement of taxes

    182,875   3,788
     

Balance as of December 31, 2009

     7,677,341  $134,382

13. Employee profit-sharing plan

13.Employee profit-sharing plan

The Company has a 401(k) profit-sharing plan (401K Plan) covering substantially all employees. Employees can contribute between 1% and 30% of their salaries in 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 and the Company matches 50% of qualified employees’ contributions up to 6% of their salary. The 401K Plan also provides for additional employer contributions to be made at the Company’s discretion. Total matching contributions to the 401K Plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and 2006 were $3.4 million, $2.2 million $2.4 million and $1.9$2.4 million, respectively. There was no discretionary contribution by the Company to the 401K Plan in 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)2007.

 

14. Segment information

14.Segment information

The Company has determined that through December 31, 2009 it hashad six reportable segments based on the way that management organizesorganized operating results to make operating decisions and to assess financial performance. Internal financial reports disaggregatedisaggregated certain operating information into these six reportable segments. The

Index to Financial Statements

Blackbaud, Inc.

Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

Company’s chief operating decision maker is its chief executive officer, or CEO. The CEO usesused the information presented in these reports to make certain operating decisions. The CEO doesdid not review any report presenting segment balance sheet information. The segment revenues and direct controllable costs, which include salaries, related benefits, third-party contractors, data expense and classroom rentals, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  License
fees
  Consulting
and
education
services(1)
  Analytic
services(2)
  Maintenance  Subscriptions  Other  Total   License
fees
  Consulting
and
education
services(1)
  Analytic
services(2)
  Maintenance  Subscriptions  Other  Total 

Year ended December 31, 2009

              

Revenue

  $25,392  $65,342  $22,492  $116,476  $72,898  $6,738  $309,338  

Direct controllable costs

   3,221   41,845   10,046   15,769   22,252   6,009   99,142  
     

Segment income

   22,171   23,497   12,446   100,707   50,646   729   210,196  

Corporate costs not allocated(3)

               21,798  

Operating expenses

               142,606  

Interest expense, net

               325  

Other income, net

               (220
                

Income before provision for income taxes

                    $45,687  

Year ended December 31, 2008

                            

Revenue

  $35,932  $77,687  $23,137  $107,304  $49,705  $8,730  $302,495   $35,932  $77,687  $23,137  $107,304  $49,705  $8,730  $302,495  

Direct controllable costs

   3,070   44,392   9,881   15,334   15,677   8,279   96,633    3,070   44,392   9,881   15,334   15,677   8,279   96,633  
          

Segment income

   32,862   33,295   13,256   91,970   34,028   451   205,862    32,862   33,295   13,256   91,970   34,028   451   205,862  

Corporate costs not allocated(3)

               19,783                19,783  

Operating expenses

               138,678                138,678  

Interest expense, net

               1,000                1,000  

Other expense, net

               194                194  
                                

Income before provision for income taxes

                    $46,207                     $46,207  

Year ended December 31, 2007

                            

Revenue

  $37,569  $73,174  $18,202  $94,602  $25,389  $8,102  $257,038   $37,569  $73,174  $18,202  $94,602  $25,389  $8,102  $257,038  

Direct controllable costs

   2,717   38,778   8,009   13,382   7,837   7,164   77,887    2,717   38,778   8,009   13,382   7,837   7,164   77,887  
          

Segment income

   34,852   34,396   10,193   81,220   17,552   938   179,151    34,852   34,396   10,193   81,220   17,552   938   179,151  

Corporate costs not allocated(3)

               14,590                14,590  

Operating expenses

               112,154                112,154  

Interest expense, net

               351                351  

Other expense, net

               503                503  
                                

Income before provision for income taxes

                    $51,553                     $51,553  

Year ended December 31, 2006

              

Revenue

  $32,500  $53,670  $7,572  $80,893  $10,605  $6,140  $191,380 

Direct controllable costs

   2,260   25,985   3,681   10,758   2,105   5,696   50,485 
     

Segment income

   30,240   27,685   3,891   70,135   8,500   444   140,895 

Corporate costs not allocated(3)

               6,786 

Operating expenses

               86,979 

Interest income, net

               (1,536)

Other expense, net

               238 
                

Income before provision for income taxes

                    $48,428 
(1)This segment consists of consulting, installation and implementation, document imaging, customer training and other educational services.
(2)This segment consists of donor prospect research and data modeling services.
(3)Various corporate costs such as depreciation, facilities and IT support costs, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangibles arising from business combinations are not allocated to the segment income as management believes that the exclusion of these costs allows the Company to better understand and manage other operating expenses and cash needs.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.Blackbaud, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Notes to consolidated financial statements—(Continued)

 

The Company also derives a portion of its revenue from its foreign operations. The following table presents revenue by geographic region based on country of invoice origin and identifiable and long-lived assets by geographic region based on the location of the assets.

 

(in thousands)  Domestic  Canada  Europe  Pacific  Total

Revenue from external customers:

          

2008

  $262,170  $13,951  $20,401  $5,973  $302,495

2007

   220,851   13,978   17,927   4,282   257,038

2006

   165,230   9,732   13,552   2,866   191,380

Property and equipment:

          

December 31, 2008

  $20,738  $50  $419  $177  $21,384

December 31, 2007

   16,276   —     536   150   16,962

The Company generated license fee revenue from its principal products as indicated in the table below:

    Years ended December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008  2007  2006 

The Raiser’s Edge

  $22,286  $22,606  $20,293 

The Financial Edge

   5,679   5,988   5,256 

The Education Edge and related

   2,011   2,633   2,312 

Blackbaud NetCommunity

   1,947   1,606   1,099 

The Patron Edge

   1,888   2,527   2,112 

Blackbaud Analytics

   129   806   1,041 

Other

   1,992   1,403   387 
     

Total license fee revenue

  $35,932  $37,569  $32,500 
(in thousands)  United States  Canada  Europe  Pacific  Total

Revenue from external customers:

          

2009

  $269,604  $13,793  $20,490  $5,451  $309,338

2008

   262,170   13,951   20,401   5,973   302,495

2007

   220,851   13,978   17,927   4,282   257,038

Property and equipment:

          

December 31, 2009

  $21,570  $83  $662  $192  $22,507

December 31, 2008

   20,738   50   419   177   21,384

It is impractical for the Company to identify its other revenues by product category.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company reorganized its business into three operating units to better align its organization around key customer groups. The following table sets forththree operating units are the goodwill balancesGeneral Markets Business Unit, the Enterprise Customer Business Unit and the International Business Unit. The Company will reflect this reorganization in the Form 10-Q for each reportable segment as of December 31, 2008the period during which management organizes operating results to make operating decisions and 2007:to assess financial performance based on the new operating unit structure.

 

    December 31, 
(in thousands)  2008  2007 

License fees

  $1,535  $1,295 

Consulting and education services

   14,167   12,923 

Analytic services

   14,781   12,989 

Maintenance

   8,569   5,729 

Subscriptions

   34,563   22,996 

Not allocated

   —     2,343 
     

Total goodwill

  $73,615  $58,275 

The increase in goodwill is attributable to the acquisition of Kintera and contingent purchase price payments made during 2008 related to the Target Companies and Campagne acquisitions.

Index to Financial Statements

BLACKBAUD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

15.Quarterly results (unaudited)

 

15. Quarterly results (unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)  

March 31,

2008

  

June 30,

2008

  September 30,
2008
  December 31,
2008
  

March 31,

2009

  

June 30,

2009

  September 30,
2009
  December 31,
2009

Total revenue

  $69,436  $72,502  $80,098  $80,459  $74,741  $76,415  $79,205  $78,977

Gross profit

   42,693   46,348   48,792   48,246   44,463   45,919   48,664   49,352

Income from operations

   11,254   14,594   11,500   10,053   7,762   10,841   13,883   13,306

Income before provision for income taxes

   11,260   14,529   10,964   9,454   7,238   10,639   13,960   13,850

Net income

   7,043   8,987   7,316   6,532   4,072   6,588   9,828   7,959

Earnings per share

                

Basic

  $0.16  $0.21  $0.17  $0.15  $0.10  $0.15  $0.23  $0.18

Diluted

  $0.16  $0.21  $0.17  $0.15  $0.09  $0.15  $0.22  $0.18
(in thousands, except per share data)  

March 31,

2007

  

June 30,

2007

  September 30,
2007
  December 31,
2007
  

March 31,

2008

  

June 30,

2008

  September 30,
2008
  December 31,
2008

Total revenue

  $55,145  $64,045  $67,835  $70,013  $69,436  $72,502  $80,098  $80,459

Gross profit

   35,250   41,449   43,792   44,070   42,693   46,348   48,792   48,246

Income from operations

   9,278   13,610   15,344   14,175   11,254   14,594   11,500   10,053

Income before provision for income taxes

   9,213   13,379   14,836   14,125   11,260   14,529   10,964   9,454

Net income

   5,756   8,203   8,808   8,957   7,043   8,987   7,316   6,532

Earnings per share

                

Basic

  $0.13  $0.19  $0.20  $0.20  $0.16  $0.21  $0.17  $0.15

Diluted

  $0.13  $0.19  $0.20  $0.20  $0.16  $0.21  $0.17  $0.15

Earnings per common share are computed independently for each of the periods presented and, therefore, may not add up to the total for the year. The results of operations of acquired companies are included in the consolidated results of operations from the date of their respective acquisition as described in Note 2.

 

F-38F-37