UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

 

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 20102011

or

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                                          to                                                          

Commission File Number         1-8399

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Ohio

  

31-1189815

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

200 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Columbus, Ohio

  

43085

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)  (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

  

(614) 438-3210

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

  

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Shares, Without Par Value

  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  þ    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.        Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).        Yes  ¨þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.            ¨þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  þ      Accelerated filer  ¨      Non-accelerated filer  ¨      Smaller reporting company  ��¨

                                                                                  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).        Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the Common Shares (the only common equity of the Registrant) held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on November 30, 2009,2010, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $717,342,269. For this purpose, executive officers and directors of the Registrant are considered affiliates.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On July 23, 2010,26, 2011, the number of Common Shares issued and outstanding was 77,892,544.74,328,346.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Selected portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be furnished to shareholders of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 30, 2010,29, 2011, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent provided herein.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

  ii

PART I

    

Item 1.

  

Business

  1

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

  11

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

  1822

Item 2.

  

Properties

  1822

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

  1923

Item 4.

  

Reserved

  1924

Supplemental Item.

  

Executive Officers of the Registrant

  2024

PART II

    

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  2226

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

  2529

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2631

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  5056

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  5259

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  102116

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

  102116

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

  104118

PART III

    

Item 10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  105119

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

  106119

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  106120

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  107121

Item 14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  107121

PART IV

    

Item 15.

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  108122

Signatures

    109123

Index to Exhibits

    E-1

 

i


SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Selected statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, in “PART I – Item 1. – Business” and “PART II – Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events. These statements are often identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or other similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to:

 

  

business plans or future or expected growth, performance, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures;

  

the sustainability of earnings;

projected profitability potential, capacity and working capital needs;

  

demand trends for the Companyus or itsour markets;

  

pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes;

  

anticipated capital expenditures and asset sales;

  

anticipated improvements and efficiencies in costs, operations, sales, inventory management, sourcing and the supply chain and the results thereof;

  

the ability to make acquisitions and the projected timing, results, benefits, costs, charges and expenditures related to acquisitions, newly-created joint ventures, headcount reductions and facility dispositions, shutdowns and consolidations;

  

the alignment of operations with demand;

the ability to operate profitably and generate cash in down markets;

  

the ability to capture and maintain margins and market share and to develop or take advantage of future opportunities, new products and markets;

  

expectations for Company and customer inventories, jobs and orders;

  

expectations for the economy and markets or improvements in the economy or markets;therein;

  

expected benefits from transformation plans, cost reduction efforts and other new initiatives;

  

expectations for increasing volatility or improving and sustaining earnings, earnings potential, margins or shareholder value;

  

effects of judicial rulings; and

  

other non-historical matters.

Because they are based on beliefs, estimates and assumptions, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Any number of factors could affect actual results, including, without limitation, those that follow:

 

  

the effect of national, regional and worldwide economic conditions generally and within major product markets, including a prolonged or substantial economic downturn;

  

the effect of conditions in national and worldwide financial markets;

  

product demand and pricing;

  

changes in product mix, product substitution and market acceptance of the Company’sour products;

  

fluctuations in pricing, quality or availability of raw materials (particularly steel),supplies, transportation, utilities and other items required by operations;

  

effects of facility closures and the consolidation of operations;

  

the effect of financial difficulties, consolidation and other changes within the steel, automotive, construction and other industries in which the Company participates;we participate;

  

failure to maintain appropriate levels of inventories;

  

financial difficulties (including bankruptcy filings) of original equipment manufacturers, end-users and customers, suppliers, joint venture partners and others with whom the Company doeswe do business;

  

the ability to realize targeted expense reductions from headcount reductions, facility closures and other cost reduction efforts;

ii


  

the ability to realize other cost savings and operational, sales and sourcing improvements and efficiencies, and other expected benefits from transformation initiatives, on a timely basis;

ii


  

the overall success of, and the ability to integrate, newly-acquired businesses and achieve synergies from such acquisitions;and other expected benefits and cost savings therefrom;

the overall success of newly-created joint ventures, including the demand for their products, and the ability to achieve the anticipated benefits and cost savings therefrom;

  

capacity levels and efficiencies, within facilities, within major product markets and within the industry as a whole;

  

the effect of disruption in the business of suppliers, customers, facilities and shipping operations due to adverse weather, casualty events, equipment breakdowns, labor issues, acts of war or terrorist activities or other causes;

  

changes in customer demand, inventories, spending patterns, product choices and supplier choices;

  

risks associated with doing business internationally, including economic, political and social instability, and foreign currency exposure;exposure and the acceptance of our products in new markets;

  

the ability to improve and maintain processes and business practices to keep pace with the economic, competitive and technological environment;

  

adverse claims experience with respect to workers’worker’s compensation, product recalls or product liability, casualty events or other matters;

  

deviation of actual results from estimates and/or assumptions used by the Companyus in the application of itsour significant accounting policies;

  

level of imports and import prices in the Company’sour markets;

  

the impact of judicial rulings and governmental regulations, including those adopted by the SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission and other governmental agencies as contemplated by the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, both in the United States and abroad; and

  

other risks described from time to time in the filings of Worthington Industries, Inc. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including those described in “PART I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We note these factors for investors as contemplated by the Act. It is impossible to predict or identify all potential risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the foregoing list to be a complete set of all potential risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on current information as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we assume no obligation to correct or update any such statements in the future, except as required by applicable law.

 

iii


PART I

Item 1. — Business

General Overview

Worthington Industries, Inc. is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Ohio (individually, the “Registrant” or “Worthington Industries” or, collectively with the subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc., “we,” “our,” “Worthington,”“Worthington” or the “Company”). Founded in 1955, Worthington is primarily a diversified metals processing company, focused on value-added steel processing and manufactured metal products. Our manufactured metal products include: pressure cylinder products such as propane, oxygen and helium tanks, hand torches, refrigerant oxygen, hand torch and industrial cylinders, camping cylinders, scuba tanks and helium balloon kits; light gauge steel framing for commercial and residential construction; framing systems and stairs for mid-rise buildings; currentsteel pallets and past model automotive service stampings;racks; and, through joint ventures, suspension grid systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings, and laser welded blanks.blanks; light gauge steel framing for commercial and residential construction and current and past model automotive service stampings.

Worthington is headquartered at 200 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Columbus, Ohio 43085, telephone (614) 438-3210. The common shares of Worthington Industries are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WOR.

Worthington Industries maintains an Internet web site at www.worthingtonindustries.com. This uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference only and is not intended to incorporate Worthington Industries’ web site into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as well as Worthington Industries’ definitive annual meeting proxy materials filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge, on or through the Worthington Industries web site, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Segments

At the end of the fiscal year ended May 31, 20102011 (“fiscal 2010”2011”), the Companywe had 4135 manufacturing facilities worldwide and held equity positions in eight12 joint ventures, which operated an additional 2443 manufacturing facilities worldwide.

The Company hasOur operations are managed principally on a products and services basis and include three principal reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Metal Framing. The Steel Processing reportable business segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit (“Worthington Steel”)., and includes Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. (“PSM”), a specialty stainless processor located in Los Angeles, California, and Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), a consolidated joint venture that operates a cold-rolled hot dipped galvanizing line. The Pressure Cylinders reportable business segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit (“Worthington Cylinders”). and India-based Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL), a consolidated joint venture that manufactures high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles and for industrial gases. The Metal Framing reportable business segment consists of the Dietrich Metal Framing business unit (“Dietrich”).

As more fully described in theRecent Developments section herein, on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of Dietrich to a newly-formed joint venture, Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”), in which we received a 25% noncontrolling interest. We retained seven of the 13 metal framing facilities, which continue to operate, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. The Steel processing, Pressure Cylindersfinancial

results and operating performance of the retained facilities will continue to be reported within our Metal Framing operating segments are the only operating segmentssegment until their expected disposition in fiscal 2012. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, will continue to be reported within the Company that met the applicable criteria for separate disclosure as reportable business segments. Metal Framing on a historical basis.

All other operating segments are combined and disclosed in the Other category, which also includes income and expense items not allocated to theour reportable business segments. The Other category includes the Worthington Steelpac Systems, LLC (“Steel Packaging”) and Worthington Global Group, LLC (the “Global Group”) operating segments.

As more fully described in the Recent Developments section herein, on May 9, 2011, we contributed substantially all of the net assets of our then automotive body panels subsidiary, The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”), to ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”), a newly-formed joint venture in which we received a 50% noncontrolling interest. As a result of this transaction, we no longer maintain an Automotive Body Panels Steel Packaging, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Constructionoperating segment. We will continue to report the financial results and Commercial Stairs operating segments.performance of this former operating segment on a historical basis through May 9, 2011 as part of the Other category for segment reporting purposes.

During the Company’s third quarter ended February 28, 2010,of fiscal 2011, we made certain organizational changes that impactedimpacting the internal reporting and management structure of our previously reported Construction Services operating segment which had been reported in the Other category. This operating segment consisted of the Worthington Integrated Building Systems (“WIBS”) business unit, which included the Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs businesses.operating segments. As a result of continued

challenges facing those businesses, the interaction between those businesses and other operations within the Company and other industry factors,these organizational changes, management responsibilities and internal reporting for these businesses were re-aligned and separated for those entities within WIBS.combined into a single operating segment, the Global Group. The purpose of the Global Group is to identify and develop potential growth platforms by applying our core competencies in metals manufacturing and construction methods. The first set of initiatives includes expansion of high density mid-rise residential construction in emerging international markets and development of new business in sectors such as renewable energy. The composition of the Company’sour reportable business segments iswas unchanged from this development (see description within “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note H – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010 of Worthington Industries for a full description of the reportable business segments), but the level of aggregation within the Other category for segment reporting purposes is impacted, as are the identified reporting units used for testing of potential goodwill impairment. Subsequent to this change, and as of February 28, 2010, the Other category, for purposes of reporting segment financial information, continues to include Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs. However, those operating units are no longer combined together as the Construction Services operating segment, but are each separate and distinct operating segments, as well as separate reporting units.development.

Worthington holdsWe hold equity positions in eight12 joint ventures, which are further discussed below underin the subheading “Joint Ventures.” Only one of the eightJoint Ventures section herein. The Spartan and WNCL joint ventures isare consolidated and itswith their operating results are reported inwithin the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders reportable business segment.segments, respectively.

During fiscal 2010,2011, the Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Metal Framing operating segments served approximately 1,100, 2,4002,700 and 3,1002,200 customers, respectively, located primarily in the United States. Foreign operations accounted for approximately 6%8% of consolidated net sales forduring fiscal 20102011 and were comprised primarily of sales to customers in Canada and Europe. No single customer accounted for over 10% of consolidated net sales during fiscal 2010. Further reportable business segment data is provided in2011.

Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note HM – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That data10-K for a full description of our reportable business segments.

Recent Developments

On July 1, 2011, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment purchased substantially all of the net assets of the BernzOmatic business (“Bernz”) from Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (the “Seller”), for cash consideration of approximately $51.0 million. The assets purchased include substantially all of the operating assets of Bernz, including machinery and equipment, intellectual property, inventories and the Bernz-owned facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. We will lease the Medina, New York facility from the Seller. Accounts receivable as of the closing date are being retained by the Seller. Foreign inventories and operations will transition to us over a period of approximately 90 days. We also generally assumed the trade accounts payable of Bernz arising in the ordinary course of business as of the closing date.

On May 9, 2011, our automotive body panel subsidiary, The Gerstenslager Company, closed an agreement with International Tooling Solutions, LLC, a tooling design and build company, to combine their businesses in a newly-formed joint venture. This new joint venture, ArtiFlex, provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. Our investment in ArtiFlex is incorporated herein by reference.accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ArtiFlex, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective May 9, 2011.

On March 18, 2011, we joined with Gestamp Renewables group to create Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC, a 50%-owned joint venture focused on producing towers for wind turbines being constructed in North America. This unconsolidated joint venture has identified Cheyenne, Wyoming as the site of the initial production facility. We anticipate contributing $9.5 million of cash to the Gestamp JV, mostly in fiscal 2012. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

On March 1, 2011, we closed an agreement with Marubeni-Itochu Steel America Inc. (“MISA”) to combine certain assets of Dietrich and ClarkWestern Building Systems in a newly-created joint venture. In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 25% interest in the new joint venture, ClarkDietrich, as well as the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. (“MMI”) steel processing locations, some of which were subsequently classified as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet. Our contribution to ClarkDietrich consisted of our metal framing business, including all of the related working capital and six of the 13 facilities. We retained and continue to operate the remaining facilities, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Our investment in ClarkDietrich is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ClarkDietrich, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011.

On December 28, 2010, we acquired a 60% ownership interest in Nitin Cylinders Limited, which is now Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited, for cash consideration of approximately $21.2 million. WNCL is a manufacturer of high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed industrial gases and compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles. The results of this joint venture are consolidated in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment due to our controlling financial interest.

On November 19, 2010, we joined with Hubei Modern Urban Construction and Development Group Co., Ltd. (“HMUCG”) of China to create Worthington Modern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co. Ltd (“WMSFMCo.”). We contributed approximately $6.2 million of cash in exchange for our 40% ownership interest in the joint venture. The purpose of WMSFMCo. is to design, manufacture, assemble and distribute steel framing materials and accessories for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and to provide project management and building design and construction supply services for those projects. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

On June 21, 2010, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired, for cash consideration of $12.2 million, the net assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”), which manufactured extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial specialty and professional racing applications. The assets of Hy-Mark have been moved to our pressure cylinders facility located in Mississippi.

Transformation Plan

In our fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”), we initiated a Transformation Plantransformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”) with the overall goal to improve the Company’sof improving our sustainable earnings potential, asset utilization and operational performance. TheTo accomplish this, the Transformation Plan focuses on cost reduction, margin

expansion and organizational capability improvements and, in the process, seeks to drive excellence in three core competencies: sales; operations; and supply chain management. The Transformation Plan is comprehensive in scope and includes aggressive diagnostic and implementation phases.

To date, we have completed the transformation phases in the Steel Processing and Metal Framing operating segments.

We retained a consulting firm to assist in the development and implementationeach of the Transformation Plan. The services provided by this firm included assistance through diagnostic tools, performance improvement technologies, project management techniques, benchmarking information and insights that directly related to the Transformation Plan. We also formed internal teams dedicated to the Transformation Plan efforts. These internal teams assumed full responsibility for executing the Transformation Plan starting in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”).

We continued to execute our Transformation Plan through fiscal 2010. Incore facilities within our Steel Processing operating segment, we have completedincluding the diagnostic and implementation phases at eachfacilities of our core facilities. Additionally, we have initiated the diagnostic process at our west coast stainless steel operation and our newly acquired facility in Cleveland, as well as in our Mexican joint venture, Serviacero.Serviacero Planos, S. de R. L. de C.V. We anticipate that we will havealso substantially completed the Transformation Plan processtransformation phases at theseour metal framing facilities and one additional Steel Processing facility by December 31, 2010. In our Metal Framing operating segment, we have substantially completed the Transformation Plan process at eight facilities and anticipate completing the process at four additional facilities by December 31, 2010.

Transformation Plan initiatives executedprior to date include facility closings, headcount reductions, other cost reductions, an enhanced and more focused commercial sales effort, improved operating efficiencies, a

consolidated sourcing and supply chain strategy and a continued emphasis on safety. We have seen positive results from these efforts; however, their impact has been dampened by the negative impact of the economic recession.contribution to ClarkDietrich.

As of May 31, 2010,2011, we had recorded a total of $65.4have recognized approximately $67.9 million of total restructuring charges associated with the Transformation Plan:Plan, including charges of $18.1 million, was incurred$43.0 million, $4.2 million and $2.6 million during fiscal 2008; $43.0 million was incurred during2008, fiscal 2009;2009, fiscal 2010 and $4.2 million was incurred during fiscal 2010. We expect to incur additional restructuring charges relating to the Transformation Plan as we progress through the remaining Metal Framing and Steel Processing facilities, although these charges should decline over the coming quarters. The need for other restructuring charges will depend largely on recommendations developed from the Transformation Plan.2011, respectively. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note MDRestructuring”Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information onregarding our restructuring charges. That information is incorporated herein by reference.

Recent Developments

On June 1, 2009, we purchased substantially allWe have seen positive results from these efforts, even with the negative impact of the assets relatedrecent economic recession. Accordingly, during our upcoming fiscal year, we plan to initiate the business of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. (collectively, “Piper”) for cash of $9,713,000. Piper is a manufacturer of aluminum high pressure cylinders and impact extruded steel and aluminum parts, serving the medical, automotive, defense, oil services and other commercial markets, with one manufacturing locationdiagnostics phase in New Albany, Mississippi. Piper operates as part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. Piper’s aluminum products increase our line of industrial gas product offerings and present an opportunity

As this process began, we retained a consulting firm to increase our participationassist in the medical cylinder market.

On August 12, 2009, we joined with ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc., to create DMFCWBS, LLC (the “Clark JV”). We contributed certain intangible assetsdevelopment and committed to pay a portion of certain costs and expenses in return for 50%implementation of the equity unitsTransformation Plan. As it progressed, we formed internal teams dedicated to this effort, and voting power ofthey ultimately assumed full responsibility for executing the joint venture. The purpose of the Clark JV is to develop, test and obtain approvals for metal framing stud designs, as well as to develop, own and license intellectual property related to such designs. The Clark JV does not manufacture or sell any products, but will license its designs to its members and possibly to third parties. The Clark JV is accounted for using the equity method of accounting, as both parties have equal voting rights and control.

On September 3, 2009, we acquired the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC (“SCI”) for cash of $24,221,000. SCI is a manufacturer of lightweight, aluminum-lined, composite-wrapped high pressure cylinders used in commercial, military, marine and aerospace applications. Product lines include cylinders for alternative fuel vehicles using compressed natural gas or hydrogen, self-contained breathing apparatuses, aviation oxygen and escape slides, military applications, home oxygen therapy and advanced and cryogenic structures. SCI operates asTransformation Plan. These internal teams are now an integral part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment.business and constitute what we refer to as the Centers of Excellence (“COE”). The acquisition of SCI allows us toCOE will continue to growmonitor the Pressure Cylinders businessperformance metrics and provides an entry into weight critical applications, further broadening the portfolio beyond the operating segment’s original, core markets.

On November 2, 2009,new processes instituted across our Metal Framing operating segment announced the formation of a strategic alliance with Bailey Metal Products Limited (“Bailey”) that included the saletransformed operations and drive continuous improvements in all areas of our Metal Framing operations in Canada to Bailey.operations. The sale included two manufacturing facilities located in Burnaby, British Columbia, and Mississauga, Ontario, and two sales and distribution centers located in LaSalle, Quebec, and Edmonton, Alberta. The alliance provides for Bailey to be the exclusive distributor of Metal Framing’s proprietary and vinyl products in Canada. Bailey has licensed its paper-faced metal corner bead product to Metal Framing to manufacture and sell in mostmajority of the United States.

On February 1, 2010, we acquiredexpenses related to the steel processing assets of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Gibraltar”) for cash of $29,164,000. Those assets are now operated within our Steel Processing operating segment. The acquisition expanded the capabilities of Worthington Steel’s cold-rolled

strip business and its ability to service the needs of new and existing customers. The assets acquired were Gibraltar’s inventories, its Cleveland, Ohio, facility, the equipment of Gibraltar’s Buffalo, New York, facility and a warehouse in Detroit, Michigan. Also acquired was the stock of Cleveland Pickling, Inc., whose only asset is a 31.25% interest in Samuel Steel Pickling Company, a joint venture which operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and one in Cleveland, Ohio.

On June 21, 2010, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired the assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”) for cash of $12,125,000. Hy-Mark manufactures extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial specialty and professional racing applications and was based in Hampton, Virginia. The assets acquired included Hy-Mark’s manufacturing equipment and inventories, whichCOE will be relocated to the Worthington Cylinders Mississippi manufacturing location, complementing the medical cylinder linesincluded in selling, general and adding a range of new products.administrative (“SG&A”) expense going forward.

Steel Processing

TheOur Steel Processing operating segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit, andwhich includes Precision Specialty Metals,PSM, a specialty stainless processor located in Los Angeles, California, (“PSM”), and Spartan, Steel Coating (“Spartan”), a consolidated joint venture whichthat operates a cold-rolled hot dipped galvanizing line. For fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, the percentage of consolidated net sales generated by theour Steel Processing operating segment was approximately 58%, 51%, 45% and 48%45%, respectively.

Worthington Steel is one of the largest independent intermediate processors of flat-rolled steel in the United States. It occupies a niche in the steel industry by focusing on products requiring exact specifications. These products cannot typically be supplied as efficiently by steel mills or end-users of these products.

TheOur Steel Processing operating segment including Spartan, owns and operates nine manufacturing facilities – one each in California, Indiana, and Maryland, two facilities in Michigan, and four facilities in Ohio – and leases one manufacturing facility in Alabama.

Worthington Steel serves approximately 1,100 customers, from these facilities, principally in the agricultural, appliance, automotive, construction, hardware, furniture, HVAC, lawn and garden, hardware, furniture, office equipment, electrical control, tubing, leisure and recreation, appliance, agricultural, HVAC, containeroffice equipment and aerospacetubing markets. Automotive-related customers have historically represented approximately half of this operating segment’s net sales. No single customer represented greater than 10% of net sales for the Steel Processing operating segment during fiscal 2010.2011.

Worthington Steel buys coils of steel from integrated steel mills and mini-mills and processes them to the precise type, thickness, length, width, shape temper and surface quality required by customer specifications. Computer-aided processing capabilities include, among others:

 

pickling, a chemical process using an acidic solution to remove surface oxide which develops on hot-rolled steel;

 

slitting, which cuts steel to specific widths;

cold reducing, which achieves close tolerances of thickness and temper by rolling;thickness;

 

hot-dipped galvanizing, which coats steel with zinc and zinc alloys through a hot-dipped process;

 

hydrogen annealing, a thermal process that changes the hardness and certain metallurgical characteristics of steel;

 

cutting-to-length, which cuts flattened steel to exact lengths;

 

tension leveling, a method of applying pressure to achieve precise flatness tolerances for steel;

edging, which conditions the edges of the steel by imparting round, smooth or knurled edges;

 

non-metallic coating, including dry lubrication, acrylic and paint; and

 

configured blanking, which stamps steel into specific shapes.

Worthington Steel also toll processes steel for steel mills, large end-users, service centers and other processors. Toll processing is different from typical steel processing in that the mill, end-user or other party retains title to the steel and has the responsibility for selling the end product. Toll processing enhances Worthington Steel’s participation in the market for wide sheet steel and large standard orders, which is a market generally served by steel mills rather than by intermediate steel processors.

The steel processing industry is fragmented and highly competitive. There are many competitors, including other independent intermediate processors. Competition is primarily on the basis of price, product quality and the ability to meet delivery requirements. Technical service and support for material testing and customer-specific applications enhance the quality of products (See “Item 1. – Business – Technical Services”). However, the extent to which technical service capability has improved Worthington Steel’s competitive position has not been quantified. Worthington Steel’s ability to meet tight delivery schedules is, in part, based on the proximity of our facilities to customers, suppliers and one another. The extent to which plant location has impacted Worthington Steel’s competitive position has not been quantified. Processed steel products are priced competitively, primarily based on market factors, including, among other things, market pricing, the cost and availability of raw materials, transportation and shipping costs, and overall economic conditions in the United States and abroad.

As noted under “Recent Developments”,in the recentlyRecent Developmentssection herein, on March 1, 2011 we acquired Gibraltarcertain steel processing business is included in the Steel Processing operating segment.assets of MISA Metals, Inc.

Pressure Cylinders

TheOur Pressure Cylinders operating segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit.unit and WNCL, a consolidated joint venture based in India. For fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, the percentage of consolidated net sales generated by Worthingtonour Pressure Cylinders operating segment was approximately 24%, 20%24% and 19%20%, respectively.

Worthington Cylinders operates ten manufacturing facilities with three facilities in Ohio and one facility in each of California, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic and Portugal.

TheOur Pressure Cylinders operating segment produces a diversified line of pressure cylinders, includingincluding: low-pressure liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) and refrigerant gas cylinders; high-pressure and industrial/specialty gas cylinders; seamless steel high pressure cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles; aluminum-lined, composite-wrapped high-pressure cylinders; airbrake tanks; and certain consumer products. The following is a more detailed discussion of these products:

LPG cylinders are sold to manufacturers, distributors and mass merchandisers and are used to hold fuel for gas barbecue grills, recreational vehicle equipment, residential and light commercial heating systems, industrial forklifts propane-fueled camping equipment, hand held torches and commercial/residential cooking (the latter, generally outside North America).

Refrigerant gas cylinders are sold primarily to major refrigerant gas producers and distributors and are used to hold refrigerant gases for commercial, residential and automotive air conditioning and refrigeration systems. High-pressure

Industrial gas products include high-pressure, acetylene and industrial/specialty gas (steel and aluminum) cylinders. These cylinders are sold primarily to gas producers and distributors for gas containment for uses such as containers for gases used in cutting, and welding, metals, breathing (medical, diving and firefighting), semiconductor production, and beverage deliverydelivery.

Retail products include camping fuel cylinders, barbecue grill cylinders, propane accessories, including propane-fueled camping equipment, hand held torches and accessories and Balloon Time helium balloon kits for all party occasions. These products are sold primarily to manufacturers, distributors and mass merchandisers.

Alternative fuel cylinders include Type I, II, III and ASME tanks for containment of compressed natural gas, systems. Worthington Cylinders also produces recovery tanks for refrigerant gases,hydrogen and propane.

Specialty products include air reservoirs for truck and trailertruck trailers, which are sold to original equipment manufacturers, and “Balloon Time®” helium kits which include non-refillable cylinders. a variety of fire suppression and chemical tanks.

While a large percentage of cylinder sales within Pressure Cylinders are made to major accounts, Worthington Cylinders hasthis operating segment serves approximately 2,4002,700 customers. During fiscal 2010,2011, no single customer represented more than 11%10% of net sales for thegenerated by our Pressure Cylinders operating segment.

WorthingtonThe Pressure Cylinders operating segment produces low-pressure steel cylinders within a wide range of refrigerant capacities of 15 to 1,000 pounds and steel and aluminum cylinders within a wide range of LPG capacities of 14.1 ounces to 420 pounds.capacities. Low-pressure cylinders are produced by precision stamping, drawing, welding and/or brazing component parts to customer specifications. They are then tested, painted and packaged, as required. High-pressure steel cylinders are manufactured by several processes, including deep drawing, tube spinning and billet piercing.

In the United States and Canada, high-pressure and low-pressure cylinders are primarily manufactured in accordance with United States Department of Transportation and Transport Canada specifications. Outside the United States and Canada, cylinders are manufactured according to European norm specifications, as well as various other international standards.

In the United States and Canada, Worthington Cylinders has one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure non-refillable refrigerant market, one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure LPG cylinder market and onethree principal domestic competitorcompetitors in the high-pressure cylinder market. There are also several foreign competitors in these markets. We believe that Worthington Cylinders believes that it has the largest domestic market share in both low-pressure cylinder markets. In the European high-pressure cylinder market, there are also several competitors. We believe that Worthington Cylinders believes that it is a leading producer in both the high-pressure cylinder and low-pressure non-refillable cylinder markets in Europe. Worthington Cylinders generally has a strong competitive position for its retail and specialty products, but competition varies on a product-by-product basis. As with Worthington’sour other operating segments, competition is based upon price, service and quality.

The Pressure Cylinders operating segment uses the trade name “Worthington Cylinders” to conduct business and the registered trademark “Balloon Time®” to market low-pressure helium balloon kits; the registered trademark “FLAMESAVER“Bernzomatic®” to market certain low-pressure gas cylinders;fuel cylinders and hand held torches; the registered trademark “WORTHINGTON PRO GRADE®” to market certain LPG cylinders, hand torches and camping fuel cylinders; and the registered trademark “MAP-PRO® Pro-Max® to market certain hand torch cylinders; and uses the registered trademark SCI® to market certain cylinders for transportation of compressed gases for inflation of flotation bags and escape slides, Self Contained Breathing Cylinders (SCBA) for fire fightingfirefighting and cylinders to contain compressed natural gas. The Pressure Cylinders operating segment intends to continue to use these trademarks and renew itsthese registered trademarks.

As noted under “Recent Developments”,Recent Developmentssection herein, Hy-Mark and the recently acquired Piper and SCI businesses are included inconsolidated joint venture with Nitin Cylinders Limited, WNCL, became part of the Pressure Cylinders operating segment forduring fiscal 2010. The Hy-Mark business will be included in the Pressure Cylinders operating segment beginning in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011.

Metal Framing

The Metal Framing operating segment consistingconsists of theour Dietrich Metal Framing business unit, designsunit. As more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and producesSupplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of Dietrich to a newly-formed joint venture, ClarkDietrich. We retained seven of the 13 metal framing componentsfacilities, which continue to operate, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. The financial results and systems and related accessories foroperating performance of the commercial and residential construction marketsretained facilities will continue to be reported within the United States. For fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, the percentage of consolidated net sales generated by theour Metal Framing operating segment was approximately 17%, 25% and 26%, respectively.

until their expected disposition in fiscal 2012. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, will continue to be reported within Metal Framing products include steel studs and track, floor and wall system components, roof trusses and other building product accessories, such as metal corner bead, lath, lath accessories, clips, fasteners and vinyl bead and trim.

The Metal Framing operating segment has 14 operating facilities located throughouton a historical basis. Refer to the United States: one facility in eachJoint Venturessection herein for additional information about the operations of Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland and New Jersey, and two facilities in each of California, Ohio and Texas.

Dietrich is the largest metal framing manufacturer in the United States, supplying approximately one-third of the metal framing products sold in the United States. Dietrich serves approximately 3,100

customers, primarily consisting of wholesale distributors, commercial and residential building contractors and mass merchandisers. During fiscal 2010, Dietrich’s three largest customers represented approximately 17%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of the net sales for the operating segment, while no other customer represented more than 3% of net sales for the Metal Framing operating segment.

The light gauge metal framing industry is very competitive. Dietrich competes with seven large regional or national competitors and numerous small, more localized competitors, primarily on the basis of price, service, breadth of product line and quality. As is the case in the Steel Processing operating segment, the proximity of facilities to customers and their project sites provides a service advantage and impacts freight and shipping costs. Dietrich’s products are transported by both common and dedicated carriers. Our Metal Framing business has been an industry leader in driving code compliance for light gauge metal framing.

Dietrich uses numerous trademarks and patents in its business. Dietrich licenses from Hadley Industries the “UltraSTEEL®” registered trademark and the United States patents to manufacture “UltraSTEEL®” metal framing which is sold as an additional line to Dietrich’s standard metal framing products. Dietrich licenses from the Clark JV the patent pending nonstructural framing product under the trademarks of “ProSTUD™” and “ProTRAK™.” “FastClip™” is a trademarked line of structural connectors that are protected under various United States patents.

The “Spazzer®” registered trademark is used in connection with wall component products that are the subject of four United States patents, two foreign patents and several pending foreign patent applications. The registered trademark “TradeReady®” is used in connection with floor-system products that are the subject of five United States patents and several foreign patents. The “Clinch-On®” registered trademark is used east of the Rocky Mountains in the United States in connection with corner bead and metal trim products for gypsum wallboard. Dietrich licenses from Brady Construction Innovations, Inc. the “PROX™” and the “SLP-TRK®” registered trademarks as well as the patents to manufacture “Pro XR™” header system. Dietrich also has a number of other patents, trademarks and trade names relating to specialized products. The Metal Framing operating segment intends to continue to use these trademarks and renew its registered trademarks.ClarkDietrich.

Other

The Other category consists of operating segments that do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria and materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure, as reportable business segments, and other corporate related entities. TheseThrough May 9, 2011, these operating segments areincluded Automotive Body Panels, Steel Packaging, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs.

Thethe Global Group. On May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels subsidiary, Gerstenslager, to ArtiFlex and the resulting deconsolidation of the contributed net assets, we no longer maintain a separate Automotive Body Panels operating segment. Accordingly, subsequent to May 9, 2011, the operating segments comprising the Other category consists of Steel Packaging and the Global Group. Each of these operating segments is explained in more detail below. We will continue to report the historical financial results and operating performance of our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment consists of The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”), which is ISO/TS 16949:2002 and ISO14001 certified. Gerstenslager provides stamping, blanking, assembly, painting, packaging, die management, warehousing, distribution management and other services to customers, primarilyon a historical basis through May 9, 2011. This former operating segment has historically been reported in the automotive industry. Gerstenslager operates two facilities in Ohio. Gerstenslager is a major supplier to“Other” category for segment reporting purposes, as it has not meet the automotive past-model year market and manages more than 3,800 finished good part numbers and more than 13,400 stamping dies/fixture setsapplicable aggregation criteria or materiality thresholds for past- and current-model year automotive and truck manufacturers, both domestic and transplant.separate disclosure. Accordingly, this organizational change did not impact the composition of our reportable segments.

Steel Packaging.The Steel Packaging operating segment consists of Worthington Steelpac Systems (“Steelpac”),is an ISO-9001: 2000 certified manufacturer of engineered, recyclable steel packaging solutions. Steelpacsolutions for external and internal movement of product. Steel Packaging operates three facilities, with one facility in each of Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania. SteelpacSteel Packaging designs and manufactures reusable custom platforms, racks and pallets made of steel for supporting, protecting and handling products throughout the shipping process for industries such as automotive, lawn and garden and recreational vehicles.

Global Group.The purpose of the Global Group operating segment, which comprises our Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs business units, is to identify and develop potential growth platforms by applying our core competencies in metals manufacturing and construction methods. The Global Group operates a business platform that includes high density mid-rise residential construction in emerging markets. Other operating segment, consistingactivities of Worthington Mid-Rise Construction located in Cleveland, Ohio, designs, suppliesthe Global Group include the design, supply and buildsbuild of mid-rise light gauge steel framed commercial structures and multi-family housing units.

The Military Construction operating segment, consisting of Worthington Military Construction located in Franklin, Tennessee, is involved inunits; the supply and construction of metal framing products for, and in the framing of, single family housing, with a focus on military housing.

The Commercial Stairs operating segment, consisting of Worthington Stairs located in Akron, Ohio, is a manufacturerhousing; and the manufacturing of pre-engineered steel egress stair solutions.

Segment Financial Data

Financial information for the reportable business segments is provided in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note HM – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That financial information is incorporated herein by reference.

Financial Information About Geographic Areas

In fiscal 2010,2011, our foreign operations represented 6%8% of consolidated net sales, 7%5% of pre-tax earnings attributable to controlling interest pre-tax, and 28%32% of consolidated net assets. During fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, we had operations in North America, China, Europe and India. Summary information about Worthington’sour foreign operations, including net sales and fixed assets by geographic region, is set forthprovided in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Risks and Uncertainties” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That summary information is incorporated herein by reference. For fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, Worthington had operations in North America and Europe. Net sales and net fixed assets by geographic region are provided in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note H – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That information is incorporated herein by reference.

Suppliers

The primary raw material purchased by Worthington is steel. We purchase steel from major primary producers of steel, both domestic and foreign. The amount purchased from any particular supplier varies from year to year depending on a number of factors including market conditions, then current relationships and prices and terms offered. In nearly all market conditions, steel is available from a number of suppliers and generally any supplier relationship or contract can and has been replaced with little or no significant interruption to our business. In fiscal 2010, Worthington2011, we purchased approximately 1.8 million tons of steel (65%(68% hot-rolled, 21%18% galvanized and 14% cold-rolled) on a consolidated basis. Steel is purchased in large quantities at regular intervals from major primary producers, both domestic and foreign. In the Steel Processing operating segment, steel is primarily purchased and processed based on specific customer orders. The Pressure Cylinders and Metal Framing operating segments purchasesegment purchases steel to meet production schedules. For certain raw materials, there are more limited suppliers – for example, hydrogen and zinc, which are generally purchased at market prices. Since there isare a limited number of suppliers in the hydrogen and zinc markets, if delivery from a major supplier is disrupted due to a force majeure type occurrence, it may be difficult to obtain an alternative supply. Raw materials are generally purchased in the open market on a negotiated spot-market basis at prevailing market prices. Supply contracts are also entered into, some of which have fixed pricing.pricing and some of which are indexed (monthly or quarterly). During fiscal 2010, the Company2011, we purchased steel from the following major suppliers, in alphabetical order: AK Steel Corporation; ArcelorMittal; California Steel Industries, Inc; Duferco Farrell Corp; Gallatin Steel Company; North Star BlueScope Steel LLC; Nucor Corporation; Severstal North America, Inc.; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; Stemcor Holdings Limited; United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”); USS-POSCO Industries, and USS-POSCO Industries.RG Steel LLC. Alcoa, Inc. was the primary aluminum supplier for the Pressure Cylinders operating segment in fiscal 2010.2011. Major suppliers of zinc to the Steel Processing operating segment were, in

alphabetical order: Considar Metal Marketing Inc. (a/k/a HudBay); Industrias Peñoles; Teck Cominco Limited; U.S. Zinc; and Xstrata Zinc Canada. Approximately 2931 million pounds of zinc were purchased in fiscal 2010. Worthington believes its2011. We believe our supplier relationships are good.

Technical Services

Worthington employsWe employ a staff of engineers and other technical personnel and maintainsmaintain fully equipped laboratories to support operations. These facilities enable verification, analysis and documentation of the physical, chemical, metallurgical and mechanical properties of raw materials and products. Technical service personnel also work in conjunction with the sales force to determine the types of flat-rolled steel required for customer needs. Additionally, technical service personnel design and engineer metal framing structures and provide sealed shop drawings to the building construction markets. To provide these services, Worthington maintainswe maintain a continuing program of developmental engineering with respect to product characteristics and performance under varying conditions. Laboratory facilities also perform metallurgical and chemical testing as dictated by the regulations of the United States Department of Transportation, Transport Canada, and other associated agencies, along with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and customer requirements. All design work complies with applicable current local and national building code requirements. An IASIASI (International Accreditations Service, Incorporated) accredited product-testing laboratory supports these design efforts.

Seasonality and Backlog

Sales areHistorically, sales have generally been weaker in the third quarter of theour fiscal year, primarily due to reduced activity in the building and construction industry as a result of theinclement weather, as well as customer plant shutdowns in the automotive industry due to holidays. Sales are generally strongest in the fourth quarter of theour fiscal year when all of theas our operating segments are normallygenerally operating at seasonal peaks.

We do not believe backlog is a significant indicator of our business.

Employees

As of May 31, 2010, Worthington employed2011, we had approximately 6,4008,400 employees, in its operations, including our unconsolidated joint ventures. Approximately 13%7% of these employees wereare represented by collective bargaining units. Worthington believes it has good relationships with its employees in general, including those covered by collective bargaining units.

Joint Ventures

As part of aour strategy to selectively develop new products, markets and technological capabilities and to expand an international presence, while mitigating the risks and costs associated with those activities, Worthington participateswe participate in onetwo consolidated and seventen unconsolidated joint ventures.

Consolidated

 

Spartan is a 52%-owned consolidated joint venture with a subsidiary of Severstal North America, Inc. (“Severstal”), located in Monroe, Michigan. It operates a cold-rolled, hot-dipped galvanizing line for toll processing steel coils into galvanized and galvannealed products intended primarily for the automotive industry. Spartan’s financial results are fully consolidated into thewithin our Steel Processing reportable business segment. The equity owned by Severstal is shown as noncontrolling interest on the Company’sour consolidated balance sheets and Severstal’s portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Company’sour consolidated statements of earnings.

WNCL is a 60%-owned consolidated joint venture with India-based Nitin Cylinders Limited (“Nitin”). WNCL manufactures high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles, and produces cylinders for compressed industrial gases. WNCL’s financial results are fully consolidated within our Pressure Cylinders reportable business segment. The equity owned by Nitin is shown as noncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheets and Nitin’s portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

Unconsolidated

 

The Clark JV isArtiFlex, a 50%-owned joint venture with ITS-H Holdings, LLC, provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. ArtiFlex owns and operates four manufacturing facilities – one each in Kentucky and Ohio; and two facilities in Michigan – and leases another manufacturing facility in Ohio.

ClarkDietrich, a 25%-owned joint venture with ClarkWestern Building Systems, LLC, is the industry leader in the manufacture and supply of light gauge steel framing products in the United States. ClarkDietrich manufactures a full line of drywall studs and accessories, structural studs and joists, metal lath and accessories, and shaft wall studs and track used primarily in residential and commercial construction. This joint venture operates 13 manufacturing facilities, one each in Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland and two each in California, Ohio and Texas.

Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC (the “Gestamp JV”), a 50%-owned joint venture with Gestamp Wind Steel U.S., Inc., focuses on producing towers for wind turbines being constructed in the North American market. The purposeGestamp JV plans to construct a manufacturing facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming, that is expected to begin operating prior to the end of the Clark JV is to develop, test and obtain approvals for metal framing stud designs and to develop, own and license intellectual property related to such designs. The Clark JV does not manufacture or sell any products, but will license its designs to its members and possibly to third parties.fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

 

LEFCO Worthington, LLC (“LEFCO Worthington”), a 49%-owned joint venture with LEFCO Industries, is a minority business enterprise which offers engineered wooden crates, specialty pallets and steel rack systems for a variety of industries. LEFCO Worthington operates one manufacturing facility in Cleveland, Ohio.

 

Samuel Steel Pickling Company (“Samuel”), a 31.25%-owned joint venture with Samuel Manu-Tech Pickling, operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and one in Cleveland, Ohio. Samuel specializes inalso performs in-line slitting, side trimming, pickle dry, under winding and the application of dry lube coatings during the pickling process.

 

Serviacero Planos, S.A.S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Serviacero Worthington”), a 50%-owned joint venture with Inverzer, S.A. de C.V., operates three facilities in Mexico, one each in Leon, Queretaro and Monterrey. Serviacero Worthington provides steel processing services such as slitting, multi-blanking and cutting-to-length to customers in a variety of industries including automotive, appliance, electronics and heavy equipment.

 

TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”), a 45%-owned joint venture with ThyssenKrupp Steel North America, Inc., is a leading North American supplier of tailor welded blanks. TWB produces laser-welded blanks for use in the automotive industry for products such as inner-door panels, body sides, rails and pillars. TWB operates facilities in: Prattville, Alabama; Monroe, Michigan; and in Puebla, Ramos Arizpe (Saltillo) and Hermosillo, Mexico.

 

Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”), a 50%-owned joint venture with Armstrong Ventures, Inc., a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., is one of the three largest global manufacturers of suspension grid systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings used in residential ceiling markets. It competes with the two other global manufacturers and numerous smaller manufacturers. WAVE operates eight facilities in six countries: Aberdeen, Maryland; Benton Harbor, Michigan; and North Las Vegas, Nevada, within the United States; Shanghai, the Peoples Republic of China; Team Valley, United Kingdom; Prouvy, France; Marval, Pune, India; and Madrid, Spain.

 

WMSFMCo, a 40%-owned joint venture with China-based HMUCG, designs, manufactures, assembles and distributes steel framing materials and accessories for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and also provides project management and building design and construction supply services thereto. This joint venture operates one facility located in Xiantao City, Hubei Province, China.

Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”), a 51%-owned joint venture with U.S. Steel, operates three steel processing facilities located in Canton, Jackson and Taylor, Michigan, which are managed by Worthington Steel. WSP serves primarily as a toll processor for U.S. Steel and others. Its services include slitting, blanking, cutting-to-length, laser welding, tension leveling and warehousing. WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note JB – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” for furtheradditional information about Worthington’s participation inour unconsolidated joint ventures.

Environmental Regulation

Worthington’sOur manufacturing facilities, generally in common with those of similar industries making similar products, are subject to many federal, state and local requirements relating to the protection of the environment. WorthingtonWe continually examinesexamine ways to reduce emissions and waste and to decrease costs related to

environmental compliance. The cost of compliance or capital expenditures for environmental control facilities required to meet environmental requirements are not anticipated to be material when compared with overall costs and capital expenditures and, accordingly, are not anticipated to have a material effect on theour financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or the competitive position of the Company.Worthington or any particular segment.

Item 1A. — Risk Factors

Future results and the market price for Worthington Industries’ common shares are subject to numerous risks, many of which are driven by factors that cannot be controlled or predicted. The following discussion, as well as other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Item“PART II – Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” describe certain business risks. Consideration should be given to the risk factors described below as well as those in the Safe Harbor Statement at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in conjunction with reviewing the forward-looking statements and other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks are not the only risks we face. Our business operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial in our operations.

Economic or Industry Downturns

The current global recession hasthat began in 2008 adversely affected and is likely tomay continue to adversely affect our business and our industries, as well as the industries and businesses of many of our customers and suppliers.    The volatile domestic and global recessionary climate is havinghad significant negative impacts on our business. The global recession, hasand the sluggish pace of the recovery from the global recession, resulted in a significant decrease in customer demand throughout nearly all of our markets, including our two largest markets – construction and automotive. The impacts of recentexisting and any new government approved and proposed measures to aid economic recovery, including various measures intended to provide stimulus to the economy in general or to certain industries, are currentlyand the growing debt levels of the United States and other countries, continue to be unknown. Overall, operating levels across many of our businessesbusiness segments have fallen and may remain at depressed levels until economic conditions improve and demand increases.

Continued volatility While certain sectors of the economy have stabilized and recovered from the economic downturn, we are unable to predict the strength, pace or sustainability of the economic recovery or the effects of government intervention or debt levels. Overall general economic conditions, both domestically and globally, have improved from the lows reached during the recession. The automotive market has shown signs of strengthening, and the construction market has shown signs of stabilizing. However, global economic conditions remain fragile, and the possibility remains that the domestic or global economies, or certain industry sectors of those economies that are key to our sales, may not recover as quickly as anticipated, or could further deteriorate, which could result in the United Statesa corresponding decrease in demand for our products and worldwide capital and credit markets has impacted and is likely to continue to significantlynegatively impact our end marketsresults of operations and result in continued negative impacts on demand, increased credit and collection risks and other adverse effects on our business.    The domestic and worldwide capital and credit markets have experienced and are experiencing significant volatility, disruptions and dislocations with respect to price and credit availability. These have caused diminished availability of credit and other capital in our end markets, including automotive and construction, and for participants in, and the customers of, those markets. There is continued uncertainty as to when and if the capital and credit markets will improve and the impact this period of volatility will have on our end markets and business in general.financial condition.

The construction and automotive industries account for a significant portion of our net sales, and reductions in demand from these industries have adversely impacted and are likely tomay continue to adversely affect our business.    The overall downturn in the economy, the disruption in capital and credit markets, declining real estate values, high unemployment rates and reduced consumer confidence and spending have caused significant reductions in demand from our end markets in general and, in particular, the construction and automotive end markets.

Demand in the commercial and residential construction markets has weakenedbeen weak as it has become morebeen difficult for companies and consumers to obtain credit for construction projects and the economic slowdown has caused delays in or cancellations of construction projects.

Non-residential construction, including publicly financed state and municipal projects, has slowed significantly due to overcapacity of commercial properties and the reluctance of state and local governments to borrow money to spend on capital projects when faced with stagnant or declining tax revenues and increased operating costs. The domestic auto industry is currently experiencingcontinues to experience a very difficult operating environment, which has resulted in and will likelymay continue to result in lower levels of vehicle production and an associated decrease in demand for products sold to the automotive

industry. Many automotive manufacturers and their suppliers have reduced production levels and eliminated manufacturing capacity, through the closure of facilities, extension of temporary shutdowns, reduction in operations and other cost reduction actions. The construction industry has shown signs of stabilizing from further erosion, and the automotive industry has strengthened and shown signs of recovery from the lows reached in recent years. However, both the construction and automotive markets remain depressed compared to historical norms, and we cannot predict the strength, pace or sustainability of recovery in these markets. The difficulties faced by thesethe automotive and construction industries are likely tohave adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our business. If demand for the products we sell to the automotive or construction markets were to be further reduced, this could negatively affect our sales, financial results and cash flows.

Financial difficulties and bankruptcy filings by our customers could have an adverse impact on our business.    Many of our customers are experiencing extremelyhave experienced and continue to experience challenging financial conditions. General Motors and Chrysler have gone through bankruptcy proceedings and both companies have implemented

plans towhich significantly reducereduced their production capacity and their dealership networks. Certain other customers have filed or are contemplating filingmay in the future file bankruptcy petitions. These and other customers may be in need of additional capital or credit to continue operations. The bankruptcies and financial difficulties of certain customers and/or failure in their effortsfailure to obtain credit or otherwise improve their overall financial condition could result in numerous changes within the markets we serve, including additional plant closings, decreased production, reduced demand, changes in product mix, unfavorable changes in the prices, terms or conditions we are able to obtain and other changes that may result in decreased purchases from us and otherwise negatively impact our business. These conditions also increase the risk that our customers may delay or default on their payment obligations to us, particularly customers in hard hit industries such as automotive and construction.

The overallrelative weakness amongin the automotive manufacturers and their suppliers has increasedindustry continues the risk that at least some of our customers whichwho are suppliers to the automotive industry could have further financial difficulties. The same is true of our customers in other industries, including construction, which are also experiencing significant financial weakness. The automotive industry has shown signs of strengthening from the low levels of recent years, and the construction industry has shown signs of stabilizing. However, economic conditions remain fragile, and the possibility remains that these markets may not recover as quickly as anticipated, or could further deteriorate. Should the economy or any applicable marketof our markets not improve, the risk of bankruptcy filings by our customers willmay continue to increase. Such bankruptcy filings may result not only in a reduction in our sales, but also in a loss associated with theour potential inability to collect outstanding accounts receivable.receivable from the affected customers. While we have taken and will continue to take steps intended to mitigate the impact of financial difficulties and potential bankruptcy filings by our customers, these matters could have a negative impact on our business.

The events in Japan could adversely affect our business and financial results.    A number of our customers, particularly in the automotive market, rely upon suppliers in Japan for certain components of their products. The earthquakes, tsunami and nuclear power plant problems in Japan prevented some companies from receiving sufficient supplies of components, and demand in some industries, such as automotive, has been adversely affected. Other risks resulting from this tragedy include potential disruptions to other industries which include our customers or suppliers, negative macroeconomic effects on international trade and/or our customers, and unforeseen challenges which could develop as the situation in Japan evolves and the full scope of the damage and its effects is comprehended. While there exists a risk that the effects of the disaster could continue to have an adverse effect on us, we are unable at this time to reliably evaluate the scope or probability of those risks.

Volatility in the United States and worldwide capital and credit markets has significantly impacted and may continue to significantly impact our end markets and has resulted and may continue to result in negative impacts on demand, increased credit and collection risks and other adverse effects on our business.    The domestic and worldwide capital and credit markets have experienced significant volatility, disruptions and dislocations with respect to price and credit availability. These factors have caused diminished availability of credit and other capital in our end markets, including automotive and construction, and for participants in, and the customers

of, those markets. There is continued uncertainty as to the sustainability of the recovery of the capital and credit markets and the impact this period of volatility will have on our end markets and business in general. Further volatility in the United States or worldwide capital and credit markets may continue to significantly impact our key end markets and result in further reductions in sales volumes, increased credit and collection risks and other adverse effects on our business.

Raw Material Pricing and Availability

The costs of manufacturing our products and theour ability to supply our customers could be negatively impacted if we experience interruptions in deliveries of needed raw materials or supplies.    If, for any reason, our supply of flat-rolled steel or other key raw materials, such as aluminum, and zinc or helium, is curtailed or we are otherwise unable to obtain the quantities we need at competitive prices, our business could suffer and our financial results could be adversely affected. Such interruptions mightcould result from a number of factors, including events such as a shortage of capacity in the supplier base or of the raw materials, energy or the inputs needed to make steel or other supplies, a failure of suppliers to fulfill their supply or delivery obligations, financial difficulties of suppliers resulting in the closing or idling of supplier facilities, other significant events affecting supplier facilities, significant weather events, those factors listed in the immediately following paragraph or other factors beyond our control. Further, the number of suppliers has decreased in recent years due to industry consolidation and the financial difficulties of certain suppliers, and this consolidation may continue. Accordingly, if delivery from a major supplier is disrupted, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternative supply than in the past.

Our future operating results may be affected by fluctuations in raw material prices.prices, and we may be unable to pass on any increases in raw material costs to our customers.    Our principal raw material is flat-rolled steel, which we purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole has been cyclical, and at times availability and pricing can be volatile due to a number of factors beyond our control.These factors include general economic conditions, domestic and worldwide demand, the influence of hedge funds and other investment funds participating in commodity markets, curtailed production from major suppliers due to factors such as the closing or idling of facilities, accidents or equipment breakdowns, repairs or catastrophic events, labor costs or problems, competition, new laws and regulations, import duties, tariffs, energy costs, availability and cost of steel inputs (e.g., ore, scrap, coke and energy), currency exchange rates and other factors described immediately in the immediately preceding paragraph. This volatility, canas well as any increases in raw material costs, could significantly affect our steel costs.

costs and adversely impact our financial results. If our suppliers increase the prices of our critical raw materials, we may not have alternative sources of supply. In addition, in an environment of increasing prices for steel and other raw materials, competitive conditions may impact how much of the price increases we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are unable to pass on future price increases in our raw materials to our customers, our financial results could be adversely affected. Also, if steel prices decrease, in general, competitive conditions may impact how quickly we must reduce our prices to our customers, and we could be forced to use higher-priced raw materials to complete orders for which the selling prices have decreased. Decreasing steel prices maycould also require us to write-down

the value of our inventory to reflect current market pricing, as was the case during fiscal 2009. These write- downs are discussed further in “Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Inventories

Our business could be harmed if we fail to maintain proper inventory levels.    We are required to maintain sufficient inventories to accommodate the needs of our customers including, in many cases, short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements. Although we typically have customer orders in hand prior to placement of our raw material orders for Steel Processing, we anticipate and forecast customer demand for alleach of our operating segments. We purchase raw materials on a regular basis in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe are sufficient to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon orders, customer volume expectations, historic buying practices and market conditions. Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in the use of higher-priced inventory to fill orders reflecting lower

selling prices, if steel prices have significantly decreased. These events could adversely affect our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate demand for our products or if our suppliers fail to supply quality products in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages mightcould result in unfilled orders, negatively impacting our customer relationships and resulting in lost revenues, any of which could harm our business and adversely affect our financial results.

Suppliers and Customers

The loss of significant volume from our key customers could adversely affect us.    In fiscal 2010,2011, our largest customer accounted for approximately 6% of our consolidated net sales, and our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 27%24% of our consolidated net sales. A significant loss of, or decrease in, business from any of theseour key customers could have an adverse effect on our sales and financial results if we cannot obtain replacement business. Also, due to consolidation in the industries we serve, including the construction, automotive and retail industries, our sales may be increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse developments with respect to, one or more of our top customers. In addition, certain of our top customers may be able to exert pricing and other influences on us, requiring us to market, deliver and promote our products in a manner that may be more costly to us. Moreover, we generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, although our customers periodically provide indications of their product needs and purchases, they generally purchase our products on an order-by-order basis, and the relationship, as well as particular orders, can be terminated at any time.

Many of our key industries, such as construction and automotive, are cyclical in nature.    TheseMany of our key industries, such as construction and automotive, are cyclical and can be impacted by both market demand and raw material supply, particularly with respect to steel. The demand for our products is directly related to, and quickly impacted by, customer demand in our industries, which can change as the result of changes in the general United States or worldwide economy and other factors beyond our control. Adverse changes in demand or pricing can have a negative effect on our business.

Significant sales reductions for any of the Detroit 3three automakers could have a negative impact on our business.    Approximately half of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment and substantially alla significant amount of the net sales of the Automotive Body Panels operating segmentcertain joint ventures are to automotive-related customers. Although we do sell to the domestic operations of foreign automakers, a significant portion of our automotive sales are to Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler (the “Detroit 3”) and their suppliers. A reduction in sales for any of the Detroit three automakers could negatively impact our business. In addition, beginning in 2011, automobile producers must begin complying with new Corporate Average Fuel Economy mileage requirements for new cars and light trucks that they produce. As automakers work to produce vehicles that comply with these new standards, they may reduce the amount of steel used in cars and trucks to improve fuel economy, thereby reducing demand for steel and resulting in further over-supply of steel in North America.

The closing or relocation of customer facilities could adversely affect us.    Our ability to meet delivery requirements and the overall cost of our products as delivered to a customer facilityfacilities are important competitive factors. If customers close or move their production facilities further away from our manufacturing facilities which can supply them, it cancould have an adverse effect on our ability to meet competitive conditions, which could result in the loss of sales. Likewise, if customers move their production facilities overseas, it cancould result in the loss of potential sales for the Company.us.

Sales conflicts with our customers and/or suppliers canmay adversely impact us.    In some instances, we may compete with one or more of our customers and/or suppliers in pursuing the same business. Such conflicts canmay strain our relationships with those parties, which cancould adversely affect our future business with them.

The closing or idling of steel manufacturing facilities could have a negative impact on us.    As steel makers have reduced their production capacities by closing or idling production lines in light of the current recessionarychallenging economic conditions, the number of facilities from which we can purchase steel, in particular certain specialty

steels, has decreased. Accordingly, if delivery from a supplier is disrupted, particularly with respect to certain types of specialty steel, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternate supply than in the past. Also, theseThese closures canand disruptions could also have an adverse effect on the supplier’sour suppliers’ on-time delivery performance, which cancould have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our own delivery commitments and may have other adverse effects on our business.

The loss of key supplier relationships could adversely affect us.    Over the years, our various manufacturing operations hadhave developed relationships with certain steel and other suppliers which have been beneficial to us by providing more assured delivery and a more favorable all-in cost, which includes price and shipping costs. If any of those relationships arewere disrupted, it cancould have an adverse effect on delivery times and the overall cost of our raw materials, which cancould have a negative impact on our business. In addition, we do not have long-term contracts with any of our suppliers. If, in the future, we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of steel and other products at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our traditional suppliers, we may be unable to obtain these products from alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedule, which could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations.

Competition

Our business is highly competitive, and increased competition could negatively impact our financial results.    Generally, the markets in which we conduct business are highly competitive. Our competitors include a variety of both domestic and foreign companies in all major markets. Competition for most of our products is primarily on the basis of price, product quality and our ability to meet delivery requirements. Depending on a variety of factors, including raw material, energy, labor and capital costs, government control of currency exchange rates and government subsidies of foreign steel producers, our business may be materially adversely affected by competitive forces. The current economic recession has also resulted in significant open capacity, which could increaseattract increased competitive presence. Competition may also increase if suppliers to or customers of our industries begin to more directly compete with our businesses through acquisition or otherwise. Increased competition could cause us to lose market share, increase expenditures, lower our margins or offer additional services at a higher cost to us, which could adversely impact our financial results.

Sales by competitors of light guagegauge metal framing products which are not code compliant could adversely affect us.    Our Metal Framing business has beenunconsolidated metal framing joint venture, ClarkDietrich, is an industry leader in driving code compliance for light gauge metal framing. If our competitors offer cheaper products which are not code compliant, and thus are cheaper, and certain customers are willing to purchase such non-compliant products, it may be difficult for usClarkDietrich to be cost competitive on these sales.

Material Substitution

If steel prices increase compared to certain substitute materials, the demand for our products could be negatively impacted, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.In certain applications, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum (particularly in the automobile industry), cement and wood (particularly in the construction industry), composites, glass and plastic.    Pricesplastic.Prices of all of these materials fluctuate widely, and differences between themthe prices of these materials and the price of steel prices may adversely affect demand for our products and/or encourage material substitution, which could adversely affect prices and demand for steel products. The high cost of steel relative to other materials canmay make material substitution more attractive for certain uses.

Freight and Energy

Increasing energy and freight costs could increase our operating costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.    The availability and cost of freight and energy, such as electricity, natural gas and diesel fuel, is important in the manufacture and transport of our products.    Ourproducts.Our operations consume substantial

amounts of energy, and our operating costs generally increase when energy costs rise. Factors that may affect our energy costs include significant increases in fuel, oil or natural gas prices, unavailability of electrical power or other energy sources due to droughts, hurricanes or other natural causes or due to shortages resulting from insufficient supplies to serve customers, or interruptions in energy supplies due to equipment failure or other causes. During periods of increasing freightenergy and energyfreight costs, we might notmay be ableunable to fully recover our operating cost increases through price increases without reducing demand for our products. Our financial results could be adversely affected if we are unable to pass all of the increases on to our customers or if we are unable to obtain the necessary freight and energy. Also, increasing energy costs could put a strain on the transportation of our materials and products if it forcesthe increased costs force certain transporters to close.

Information Systems

We are subject to information system security risks and systems integration issues that could disrupt our internal operations.    We are dependent upon information technology for the distribution of information internally and also to our customers and suppliers. This information technology is subject to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including, but not limited towithout limitation, computer viruses, security breaches and defects in design. ThereWe could also could be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded business management systems are defective, or are not installed properly or are not properly integrated into operations. We recently implemented a new software-based enterprise resource planning system. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information system and network disruptions, but a system failure could negatively impact our operations and financial results.

Business Disruptions

Disruptions to our business or the business of our customers or suppliers could adversely impact our operations and financial results.    Business disruptions, including increased costs for, or interruptions in, the supply of energy or raw materials, resulting from shortages of supply or transportation, from severe weather events (such as hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, tornados, floods and blizzards), from casualty events (such as explosions, fires or material equipment breakdown), from acts of terrorism, from pandemic disease, from labor disruptions, the idling of facilities due to reduced demand (such as resulting from the recent economic downturn) or from other events (such as required maintenance shutdowns), could cause interruptions to our businesses as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers. While we maintain insurance coverage that can offset some losses relating to certain types of these events, losses from business disruptions could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results and we cancould be adversely impacted to the extent any such losses are not covered by insurance or cause some other adverse impact to the us.

Foreign Operations

Economic, political and other risks associated with foreign operations could adversely affect our international financial results.    Although the substantial majority of our business activity takes place in the United States, we derive a portion of our revenues and earnings from operations in foreign countries, and we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. We have wholly-owned facilities in Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, India and Portugal and joint venture facilities in China, France, India, Mexico, Spain and the United Kingdom. Our Mid-Rise Construction business is alsoKingdom, and are becoming more active in pursuingexploring foreign business.opportunities. The risks of doing business in foreign countries include:include, among other factors: the potential for adverse changes in the local political climate, in diplomatic relations between foreign countries and the United States or in government policies, laws or regulations; terrorist activity that may cause social disruption; logistical and communications challenges; costs of complying with a variety of laws and regulations; difficulty in staffing and managing geographically diverse operations; deterioration of foreign economic conditions; inflation and fluctuations in interest rates; currency rate fluctuations; foreign exchange restrictions; differing local business practices and cultural considerations; restrictions on imports and exports or sources of supply;supply, including energy and raw materials; changes in duties, quotas, tariffs, taxes or taxes;other protectionist measures; and potential issues related

to matters covered by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar laws. We believe that our business activities outside of the United States involve a higher degree of risk than our domestic activities.

Theactivities, and any one or more of these factors could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. In addition, the global recession and the volatility of worldwide capital and credit markets have significantly impacted and will likelymay continue to significantly impact our foreign customers and markets. This hasThese factors have resulted in decreased demand in our foreign operations and is havinghave had significant negative impacts on our business. See, in general,Refer to the discussion underEconomic or Industry Downturns” above. risk factor herein for additional information concerning the impact of the global recession and the volatility of capital and credit markets on our business.

Joint Ventures

A change in the relationship between the members of any of our joint ventures may have an adverse effect on that joint venture.    Worthington hasWe have been successful in the development and operation of various joint ventures, and our equity in net income from our joint ventures, particularly WAVE, has been important to our

financial results. We believe an important element in the success of any joint venture is a solid relationship between the members of that joint venture. If there is a change in ownership, a change of control, a change in management or management philosophy, a change in business strategy or another event with respect to a member of a joint venture that adversely impacts the relationship between the joint venture members, it maycould adversely impact that joint venture. In addition, joint ventures necessarily involve special risks. Whether or not we hold a majority interest or maintain operational control in a joint venture, our partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our interests or goals. For example, our partners may exercise veto rights to block actions that we believe to be in our best interests, may take action contrary to our policies or objects with respect to our investments, or may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations or commitments to the joint venture.

Acquisitions

We may not be ableunable to successfully consummate, manage andor integrate future acquisitions successfully.our acquisitions.    SomeA portion of our growth has beenoccurred through acquisitions. We may from time to time continue to seek additional businessesattractive opportunities to acquire in the future.businesses, enter into joint ventures and make other investments that are complementary to our existing strengths. There are no assurances, however, that any acquisition opportunities will arise or, if they do, that they will be consummated, or that any needed additional financing for such opportunities will be available on satisfactory terms when required. In addition, acquisitions involve risks that the businesses acquired will not perform in accordance with expectations, that business judgments concerning the value, strengths and weaknesses of businesses acquired will prove incorrect, that we may assume unknown liabilities from the seller, that the acquired businesses may not be integrated successfully and that the acquisitions may strain our management resources.resources or divert management’s attention from other business concerns. International acquisitions may present unique challenges and increase our exposure to the risks associated with foreign operations and countries. Failure to successfully integrate any of our acquisitions may cause significant operating inefficiencies and could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

Capital Expenditures

Our business requires capital investment and maintenance expenditures, and our capital resources may not be adequate to provide for all of our cash requirements.    Many of our operations are capital intensive. For the five-year period ended May 31, 2011, our total capital expenditures, including acquisition and investment activity, were approximately $455.4 million. Additionally, at May 31, 2011, we were obligated to make aggregate lease payments of $32.4 million under operating lease agreements. Our business also requires expenditures for maintenance of our facilities. We currently believe that we have adequate resources (including cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities, availability under existing credit facilities and unused lines of credit) to meet our cash needs for normal operating costs, capital expenditures,

debt repayments, dividend payments, future acquisitions and working capital for our existing business. However, given the current challenges, uncertainty and volatility in the domestic and global economies and financial markets, there can be no assurance that our capital resources will be adequate to provide for all of our cash requirements.

Litigation

We may be subject to legal proceedings or investigations, the resolution of which could negatively affect our results of operations and liquidity in a particular period.    Our results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be affected by an adverse ruling in any legal proceedings or investigations which may be pending against us or filed against us in the future. We are also subject to a variety of legal compliance risks, including, without limitation, potential claims relating to product liability, health and safety, environmental matters, intellectual property rights, taxes and compliance with U.S. and foreign export laws, anti-bribery laws, competition laws and sales and trading practices. While we believe that we have adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs to address and reduce these risks, the global and diverse nature of our operations means that these risks will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and contingencies may arise from time to time. A future adverse ruling or settlement or an unfavorable change in laws, rules or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or liquidity in a particular period. For additional information regarding our pending legal proceedings and contingencies, refer to “Part I – Item 3. – Legal Proceedings” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part II – Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Accounting &and Tax Estimates

We are required to make accounting and tax-related estimates, assumptions and judgments in preparing our consolidated financial statements.statements, and actual results may differ materially from the estimates, assumptions and judgments that we use.    In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for and recognition of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions must be made because certain information that is used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is dependent on future events, or cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data available.available to us. In some cases, these estimates and assumptions are particularly difficult to determine and we must exercise significant judgment. The estimates, assumptions and the assumptionsjudgments having the greatest amount of uncertainty, subjectivity and complexity are related to our accounting for bad debts, returns and allowances, inventory, self-insurance reserves, derivatives, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxestax assets and liabilities and asset impairments. ActualOur actual results couldmay differ materially from the estimates, assumptions and assumptionsjudgments that we use, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Tax Laws and Regulations

Tax increases or changes in tax laws could adversely affect our financial results.    We are subject to tax and related obligations in the jurisdictions in which we operate or do business, including state, local, federal and foreign taxes. The taxing rules of the various jurisdictions in which we operate or do business often are complex and subject to varying interpretations. Tax authorities may challenge tax positions that we take or historically have taken, and may assess taxes where we have not made tax filings or may audit the tax filings we have made and assess additional taxes. Some of these assessments may be substantial, and also may involve the imposition of penalties and interest. In addition, governments could impose new taxes on us or increase the rates at which we are taxed in the future. The payment of substantial additional taxes, penalties or interest resulting from tax assessments, or the imposition of any new taxes, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, our provision for income

taxes and cash tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by changes in U.S. tax laws. Potential changes that may adversely affect our financial results include, without limitation, decreasing the ability of U.S. companies to receive a tax credit for foreign taxes paid or to defer the U.S. deduction of expenses in connection with investments made in other countries.

Claims and Insurance

Adverse claims experience, to the extent not covered by insurance, may have an adverse effect on our financial results.    We self-insure a significant portion of our potential liability for workers’ compensation, product liability, general liability, property liability, automobile liability and employee medical claims. In order to reduce risk, we purchase insurance from highly rated,highly-rated, licensed insurance carriers that coverscover most claims in excess of the applicable deductible or retained amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to resolve open claims as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. The occurrence of significant claims, our failure to adequately reserve for such claims, a significant cost increase to maintain our insurance or the failure of our insurance providerproviders to perform could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Principal Shareholder

Our principal shareholder may have the ability to exert significant influence in matters requiring a shareholder vote and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Worthington Industries.    Pursuant to our charter documents, certain matters such as those in which a person would attempt to acquire or take control of the Company, must be approved by the vote of the holders of common shares representing at least 75% of Worthington Industries’ outstanding voting power. Approximately 22%25% of our outstanding common shares are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by John P. McConnell, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. As a result of his beneficial ownership of our common shares, Mr. McConnell may have the ability to exert significant influence in these matters and other proposals upon which our shareholders may vote.

Senior Management

If we lose our senior management or other key employees, our business may be adversely affected.    Our ability to successfully operate, grow our business and implement our business strategies is largely dependent on the efforts, abilities and services of our senior management and other key employees. The loss of any of these individuals or our inability to attract, train and retain additional personnel could reduce the competitiveness of our business or otherwise impair our operations or prospects. Our future success will also depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, such as engineers and other skilled technicians, who have experience in the application of our products and are knowledgeable about our business, markets and products. We cannot assure that we will be able to retain our existing senior management personnel or other key employees or attract additional qualified personnel when needed. We have not entered into any formal employment agreements or change in control agreements with our executive officers, and the loss of any member of our management team could adversely impact our business and operations. Additionally, we may modify our management structure from time to time or reduce our overall workforce as we did in certain operating segments during the recent economic downturn, which may create marketing, operational and other business risks.

Credit Ratings

RatingRatings agencies may downgrade our credit ratings, which could make it more difficult for us to raise capital and could increase our financing costs.    Any downgrade in our credit ratings may make raising capital more difficult, may increase the cost and affect the terms of future borrowings, may affect the terms under which we purchase goods and services and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business

opportunities. TheIn addition, the interest rate on some of our revolving credit facilitiesfacility is tied to our credit rating. Anyratings, and any downgrade of our credit ratings would likely result in an increase in the current cost of borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Difficult Financial Markets

Should we be required to raise capital in the current financing environment, potential outcomes might includewe could face higher borrowing costs, less available capital, more stringent terms and tighter covenants or, in extreme conditions, an inability to raise capital.    Although we currently have significant borrowing availability under our existing credit facilities, should those facilities become unavailable due to covenant or other defaults, or should we otherwise be required to raise capital outside our existing facilities, given the current uncertainty and volatility in the financialU.S. credit and capital markets, our ability to access capital and the terms under which we do so may change.be negatively impacted. Any adverse change in our access to capital or the terms of our borrowings, including increased costs, wouldcould have a negative impact on us.our financial condition.

Environmental, Health and Safety

We may incur additional costs related to environmental and health and safety matters.    Our operations and facilities are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety. Failure to maintain or achieve compliance with these laws and regulations or with the permits required for our operations could result in increased costs and capital expenditures and potentially fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, cleanup costs or temporary or permanent discontinuance of operations. Over time, we and other predecessor operators of our facilities have generated, used, handled and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. Environmental liabilities, could exist, including cleanup obligations, could exist at theseour facilities or at off-site locations where materials from our operations were disposed of or at facilities we have divested, which could result in future expenditures that cannot be currently quantified and which could reduce our profits and cash flow. We may be held strictly liable for theany contamination of these sites, and the amount of thatany such liability could be material. Due to our stringent commitment toward safety, it is probable that we may incur costs which exceed compliance in many areas. Under the “joint and several” liability principle of certain environmental laws, we may be held liable for all remediation costs at a particular site, even with respect to contamination for which we are not responsible. Changes in environmental and human health and safety laws, rules, regulations or enforcement policies including without limitation new or more stringent regulations affecting greenhouse gas emissions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Legislation and Regulation

Certain proposed legislation and regulations canmay have an adverse impact on the economy in general and in our markets specifically, which may adversely affect our business.    Our business may be negatively impacted by a variety of new or proposed legislation or regulations. For example, legislation and regulations proposing increases in taxation on, or heightened regulation of, carbon or other greenhouse gas emissions may result in higher prices for steel, higher prices for utilities required to run our facilities, higher fuel costs for us and our shipperssuppliers and distributors and other adverse impacts. See the immediately following risk factor for additional information regarding legislation and regulations concerning climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. To the extent this or otherthat new legislation or regulation increasesregulations increase our costs, we may not be able to fully pass these costs on to our customers without a resulting decline in sales and adverse impact to our profits. Likewise, to the extent new legislation or regulationregulations would have an adverse effect on the economy, our markets or the ability of domestic businesses to compete against foreign operations, it could also have an adverse impact on us.

Legislation or regulations concerning climate change and greenhouse gas emissions may negatively affect our results of operations.    Energy is a significant input in a number of our operations and products, and many believe that consumption of energy derived from fossil fuels is a contributor to global warming. A number of

governments and governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating legislative and regulatory changes in response to the potential impacts of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. The European Union has established greenhouse gas regulations, and Canada has published details of a regulatory framework for greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued and proposed regulations addressing greenhouse gas emissions, including regulations which will require reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from large sources and suppliers in the United States. Legislation previously has been introduced in the U.S. Congress aimed at limiting carbon emissions from companies that conduct business that is carbon-intensive. Among other potential items, such bills could include a system of carbon emission credits issued to certain companies, similar to the European Union’s existing cap-and-trade system. Several U.S. states have also adopted, and other states may in the future adopt, legislation or regulations implementing state-wide or regional cap-and-trade systems that apply to some or all industries that emit greenhouse gases. It is impossible at this time to forecast what the final regulations and legislation, if any, will look like and the resulting effects on our business and operations. Depending upon the terms of any such regulations or legislation, however, we could suffer a negative financial impact as a result of increased energy, environmental and other costs necessary to comply with limitations on greenhouse gas emissions, and we may see changes in the margins of our greenhouse gas-intensive and energy-intensive assets. In addition, depending upon whether similar limitations are imposed globally, the regulations and legislation could negatively impact our ability to compete with foreign companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Many of our customers in the United States, Canada and Europe may experience similar impacts, which could result in decreased demand for our products.

Seasonality

Our operations have been subject to seasonal fluctuations that may impact our cash flows for a particular period.    Historically, our sales are generally weaker in the third quarter of the fiscal year, primarily due to reduced activity in the building and construction industry as a result of the colder, more inclement weather, as well as customer plant shutdowns in the automotive industry due to holidays. Sales are generally strongest in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year when all of our business segments are normally operating at seasonal peaks. Our quarterly results may also be affected by the timing of large customer orders. Consequently, our cash flow from operations may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. If, as a result of any such fluctuation, our quarterly cash flows were significantly reduced, we may be unable to service our indebtedness or maintain compliance with certain covenants under our credit facilities. A default under any of the documents governing our indebtedness could prevent us from borrowing additional funds, limit our ability to pay interest or principal and allow our lenders to declare the amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and to exercise certain other remedies.

Impairment Charges

Continued or enhanced weakness or instability in the economy, our markets or our results of operations could result in future asset impairments, which would reduce our reported earnings and net worthworth..    We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or aan asset group of assets may not be recoverable. When a potential impairment is indicated, accounting standards require a charge to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements if the carrying amount of an asset or asset group of assets exceeds the fair valuesum of the undiscounted future cash flows of that asset or group of assets.asset group. The loss recognized would be the difference between the fair value andamount by which the carrying amountvalue of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value. In recent months, we have seen signs of assets.improvement in overall economic conditions, both domestically and globally. However, economic conditions remain fragile, and the possibility remains that the domestic or global economies, or certain industry sectors that are key to our sales, may not recover as quickly as anticipated, or could further deteriorate. If certain of our business segments continue to be adversely affected by the challenging and volatile economic and financial conditions, we may be required to record additional impairments, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

Item 1B. — Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. — Properties.

General

TheOur principal corporate offices of Worthington Industries, as well as the corporate offices for Worthington Steel, Worthington Cylinders and Dietrich, are located in a leased office building in Columbus, Ohio, containing approximately 117,700 square feet. WorthingtonWe also ownsown three facilities used for administrative and medical purposes in Columbus, Ohio, containing an aggregate of approximately 166,000 square feet. As of May 31, 2010, Worthington2011, we owned or leased a total of approximately 9,700,0008,600,000 square feet of space for our operations, of which approximately 8,200,0007,200,000 square feet (9,200,000(8,100,000 square feet with warehouses) was devoted to manufacturing, product distribution and sales offices. Major leases contain renewal options for periods of up to ten10 years. For information concerning rental obligations, see the discussion of contractual obligations underrefer to “Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments” as well as “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note LQ – Operating Leases” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Worthington believesWe believe the distribution and office facilities provide adequate space for our operations and are well maintained and suitable.

Excluding joint ventures, Worthington operates 41we operate 35 manufacturing facilities and ten warehouses. TheThese manufacturing facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition, and are believed to be sufficient to meet current needs.

Steel Processing

TheOur Steel Processing operating segment, which includes the consolidated joint venture Spartan, operates ten13 manufacturing facilities, nine12 of which are wholly-owned, containing a total of approximately 2,860,0003,300,000 square feet, and one of whichthat is leased, containing approximately 150,000 square feet. These facilities are located in Alabama, California, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan (2), Ohio (5) and Ohio (4)Tennessee (2). This operating segment also owns one warehouse in Ohio, containing approximately 110,000 square feet, one warehouse in Michigan, containing approximately 100,000 square feet, and one warehouse in California, containing approximately 60,000 square feet. As noted above, this operating segment’s corporate offices are located in Columbus, Ohio.

Pressure Cylinders

TheOur Pressure Cylinders operating segment operates nine11 owned manufacturing facilities and one leased manufacturing facility, whichfacility. These facilities are located in California, Mississippi, Ohio (3), Wisconsin, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, India and Portugal containingand contain a total of approximately 1,800,0001,900,000 square feet. The Pressure

CylindersThis operating segment also operates two owned warehouses, one in Austria and one in the Czech Republic, containing a total of approximately 97,000 square feet, and twothree leased warehouses, onetwo in Ohio and one in Canada, containing a total of approximately 95,000164,000 square feet.

Metal Framing

TheOur Metal Framing operating segment operates 14three manufacturing facilities. These facilities are located in California (2), Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio (2), and Texas (2).one warehouse. Of these manufacturing facilities, seven areone is leased, containing a total of approximately 490,00085,000 square feet, and seventwo are owned, containing a total of approximately 1,300,000242,000 square feet. This operating segment operates oneThe leased warehouse in Ohio which is owned and contains approximately 314,000 square feet. This operating segment also ownsAll of these properties operate exclusively to support the transition of our metal framing business into the ClarkDietrich joint venture and operates an administrative facility containing approximately 37,000 square feet in Indiana; and leases administrative space in three locations, containing an aggregate of approximately 30,000 square feet, in California, Indiana and Pennsylvania. During fiscal 2009, the Metal Framing corporate and administrative offices werewill be subsequently shut down, closed and moved from Pennsylvania to Columbus, Ohio. As part of the Transformation Plan announced by the Company in September 2007, this operating segment has ceased manufacturing operations at eleven facilities: two owned and nine leased facilities. The two owned facilities are currently up for sale. Of the leased facilities, one lease expired concurrently with the closing of the facility and the other eight leases, which expire between 2010 and 2015, are being offered for subletting.or sold.

Other

SteelpacSteel Packaging operates three facilities, one each in Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The manufacturing facilities in Indiana and Pennsylvania are leased and contain a total of approximately 290,000 square feet; and the facility located in Ohio is owned and contains approximately 21,000 square feet. Gerstenslager ownsGlobal Group includes Worthington Military Construction, Inc., Worthington Mid-Rise Construction, Inc. and operates twoWorthington Metal Fabricators, LLC which operate manufacturing facilities both located in Ohio, containing a total ofTennessee and Washington which contain approximately 1,100,000 square feet; leases approximately 150,000 square feet in one warehouse in Ohio; and owns approximately 135,000 square feet in one warehouse in Ohio. Military Construction operates a manufacturing facility in Tennessee which contains approximately 4,500223,500 square feet and leaseslease approximately 1,80018,300 square feet for administrative offices in Hawaii. Mid-Rise Construction leasesHawaii and operates aOhio. Additionally, we retained Gerstenslager’s manufacturing facility in WashingtonWooster, Ohio, which is subject to a lease agreement with ArtiFlex and contains approximately 19,000 square feet and leases administrative space containing approximately 16,500 square feet in Ohio. Commercial Stairs leases one manufacturing facility in Ohio, which contains approximately 200,000900,000 square feet.

Joint Ventures

The Spartan consolidated joint venture owns and operates one manufacturing facility in Michigan, which is included in the number disclosed above for the Steel Processing operating segment.segment, and the WNCL consolidated joint venture owns and operates a manufacturing facility in India. The unconsolidated joint ventures operate a total of 2343 manufacturing facilities, located in Alabama, California (2), Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan (6)(8), Nevada and Ohio (4)(6), domestically, and in China, France, India, Mexico (6), Spain and the United Kingdom, internationally.

Item 3. — Legal Proceedings

Various legal proceedings, which generally have arisen in the ordinary course of business, are pending against Worthington. None of this pending litigation, individually or collectively, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operation or cash flows of the Company.

Notwithstanding the statement above, seerefer to “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data–Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note GE – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding certain litigation which remained pending during fiscal 2010.2011. Additionally, refer to “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note T – Subsequent Events” for information regarding developments that occurred subsequent to May 31, 2011 related to litigation pending during fiscal 2011.

Item 4. — [Reserved]

Supplemental Item — Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table lists the names, positions held and ages of the Registrant’s executive officers as of July 30, 2010:August 1, 2011:

 

Name

  Age  

Position(s) with the Registrant

  Present Office
Held Since
  Age   

Position(s) with the Registrant

  Present Office
Held Since
 

John P. McConnell

  56  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; a Director  1996   57    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; a Director   1996  

George P. Stoe

  64  President and Chief Operating Officer  2008   65    President and Chief Operating Officer   2008  

B. Andrew Rose

  40  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  2008   41    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   2008  

Dale T. Brinkman

  57  Vice President-Administration, General Counsel and Secretary  2000   58    Vice President-Administration, General Counsel and Secretary   2000  

Harry A. Goussetis

  56  President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation  2005

Andrew J. Billman

   43    President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation   2011  

Matthew A. Lockard

  41  Vice President-Corporate Development and Treasurer  2009   42    Vice President-Corporate Development and Treasurer   2009  

John E. Roberts

  55  President, Dietrich Industries, Inc.  2007

Ralph V. Roberts

  63  Senior Vice President-Marketing  2006   64    Senior Vice President-Marketing and President, Worthington Global Group, LLC   2006  

Mark A. Russell

  47  President, The Worthington Steel Company  2007   48    President, The Worthington Steel Company   2007  

Eric M. Smolenski

  40  Vice President-Human Resources  2005   41    Vice President-Human Resources   2005  

Richard G. Welch

  52  Controller  2000   53    Controller   2000  

Virgil L. Winland

  62  Senior Vice President-Manufacturing  2001   63    Senior Vice President-Manufacturing   2001  

John P. McConnell has served as Worthington Industries’ Chief Executive Officer since June 1993, as a director of Worthington Industries continuously since 1990, and as Chairman of the Board of Worthington Industries since September 1996. Mr. McConnell serves as the Chair of the Executive Committee of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors. He has served in various positions with Worthington Industriesthe Company since 1975.

George P. Stoe has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries since October 2008. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries from December 2005 to October 2008. He previously served as President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation from January 2003 to December 2005.

B. Andrew ‘Andy’ Rose has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Worthington Industries since December 2008. From 2007 to 2008, he served as a senior investment professional with MCG Capital Corporation;Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in investments in middle market companies; and from 2002 to 2007, he was a founding partner at Peachtree Equity Partners, L.P., a private equity firm backed by Goldman Sachs. Prior to 2002, Mr. Rose was vice president of private equity at Wachovia Capital Associates, a private equity firm.

Dale T. Brinkman has served as Worthington Industries’ Vice President-Administration since December 1998 and as Worthington Industries’ General Counsel since September 1982. He has been Secretary of Worthington Industries since September 2000 and served as Assistant Secretary of Worthington Industries from September 1982 to September 2000.

Harry A. GoussetisAndrew J. Billman has served as President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation since December 2005.August 2011. From January 2001February 2010 to December 2005, Mr. GoussetisAugust 2011, he served as Vice President-Human ResourcesPresident-Purchasing for Worthington Industries, and he heldIndustries. He has served in various other positions with Worthington Industries from November 1983 to January 2001.the Company since 1991.

Matthew A. Lockard has served as Treasurer of Worthington Industries since February 2009, and as Vice President-Corporate Development of Worthington Industries since July 2005. From April 2001 to July 2005,

Mr. Lockard served as Vice President-Global Business Development for Worthington Cylinder Corporation. Mr. Lockard served in various other positions with Worthington Industriesthe Company from January 1994 to April 2001.

John E. Roberts has served as President of Dietrich Industries, Inc. since October 2007, and prior thereto, served as its Vice President of Sales and Marketing from June 2007 to October 2007. He was Regional General Manager, Director of Sales and Marketing for Owens Corning, a producer of residential and commercial building materials, from June 1996 through June 2007.

Ralph V. Roberts has served as Senior Vice President-Marketing of Worthington Industries since January 2001, and servedalso as President of Worthington Integrated Building Systems,Global Group, LLC from(or its predecessors) since November 2006 to January 2010.2006. From June 1998 through January 2001, he served as President of The Worthington Steel Company, and he held various other positions with Worthington Industriesthe Company from December 1973 to June 1998, including Vice President-Corporate Development and Chief Executive Officer of the WAVE joint venture.

Mark A. Russell has served as President of The Worthington Steel Company since February 2007. From August 2004 through February 2007, Mr. Russell was a partner in Russell & Associates, an acquisition group formed to acquire aluminum products companies. Mr. Russell served as Chief Executive Officer of Indalex Inc., a producer of extruded aluminum products, from January 2002 to March 2004.

Eric M. Smolenski has served as Vice President-Human Resources of Worthington Industries since January 2004.December 2005. From January 2001 to January 2004,December 2005, Mr. Smolenski served as the Director of Corporate Human Resources Services of Worthington Industries, and he served in various other positions with Worthington Industriesthe Company from January 1994 to January 2001.

Richard G. Welch has served as the Corporate Controller of Worthington Industries since March 2000 and prior thereto, he served as Assistant Controller of Worthington Industries from August 1999 to March 2000. He served as Principal Financial Officer of Worthington Industries on an interim basis from September 2008 to December 2008.

Virgil L. Winland has served as Senior Vice President-Manufacturing of Worthington Industries since January 2001. He served in various other positions with Worthington Industries from 1971 to January 2001, including President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation from June 1998 through January 2001.

Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the directors of the Registrant. There are no family relationships among any of the Registrant’s executive officers or directors. No arrangements or understandings exist pursuant to which any individual has been, or is to be, selected as an executive officer of the Registrant.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Common Shares Information

The common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. (“Worthington Industries”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WOR” and are listed in most newspapers as “WorthgtnInd.” As of July 23, 2010,26, 2011, Worthington Industries had 7,1416,941 registered shareholders. The following table sets forth (i) the low and high closing prices and the closing price per share for Worthington Industries’ common shares for each quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009,2011, and (ii) the cash dividends per share declared on Worthington Industries’ common shares for each quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.2011.

 

  Market Price  Cash
Dividends
   Declared   
  Market Price   Cash
Dividends
   Declared   
 
     Low        High        Closing          Low         High         Closing      

Fiscal 2010

Quarter Ended

                
               

August 31, 2009

  $11.19  $15.49  $13.17  $0.10  $11.19    $15.49    $13.17    $0.10  

November 30, 2009

  $11.05  $15.95  $11.71  $0.10  $11.05    $15.95    $11.71    $0.10  

February 28, 2010

  $11.47  $17.35  $15.84  $0.10  $11.47    $17.35    $15.84    $0.10  

May 31, 2010

  $13.95  $17.67  $14.72  $0.10  $13.95    $17.67    $14.72    $0.10  

Fiscal 2009

Quarter Ended

            

August 31, 2008

  $16.65  $24.11  $17.60  $0.17

November 30, 2008

  $8.83  $18.99  $13.28  $0.17

February 28, 2009

  $8.20  $13.89  $8.20  $0.17

May 31, 2009

  $7.15  $15.88  $13.99  $0.10

Fiscal 2011

Quarter Ended

                
  

August 31, 2010

  $12.05    $15.36    $14.22    $0.10  

November 30, 2010

  $14.63    $16.59    $16.02    $0.10  

February 28, 2011

  $16.44    $20.00    $19.36    $0.10  

May 31, 2011

  $18.30    $21.83    $21.83    $0.10  

Dividends are declared at the discretion of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors. Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.17$0.10 per common share in fiscal 2009, until reducing2011 and fiscal 2010. On June 29, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 to $0.10$0.12 per common share. A $0.10 per common shareThis dividend was declared for each quarteris payable on September 29, 2011, to shareholders of fiscal 2010. record as of September 15, 2011.

The Board of Directors reviews the dividend on a quarterly basis and establishes the dividend rate based upon Worthington Industries’ financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, current and projected cash flows, business prospects and other factors which the directors may deem relevant. While Worthington Industries has paid a dividend every quarter since becoming a public company in 1968, there is no guarantee this will continue in the future.

Shareholder Return Performance

The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate such information into such a filing.

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative return on Worthington Industries’ common shares, the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at May 31, 2005,2006, in Worthington Industries’ common shares and each index.

* $100 invested on 5/31/0506 in common shares or index. Assumes reinvestment of dividends when received. Fiscal year endingended May 31.

 

  5/05  5/06  5/07  5/08  5/09  5/10  5/06   5/07   5/08   5/09   5/10   5/11 

Worthington Industries, Inc.

  $100.00  $105.34  $135.33  $132.32  $98.00  $106.08  $100.00    $128.47    $125.61    $93.03    $100.70    $153.05  

S&P Midcap 400 Index

  $100.00  $115.57  $140.05  $136.55  $90.81  $122.16  $100.00    $121.18    $118.15    $78.57    $105.70    $140.53  

S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index

  $100.00  $192.33  $297.80  $368.45  $147.06  $184.82  $100.00    $154.83    $191.57    $76.46    $95.88    $113.47  

Data and graph provided by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. Copyright© 2010,2011, Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.permission.

Worthington Industries is a component of the S&P Midcap 400 Index. The S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index, of which Worthington Industries is a component, is the most specific index relative to the largest line of business of Worthington Industries and its subsidiaries. At May 31, 2010,2011, the S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index included 12 steel related companies from the S&P 500, S&P Midcap 400 and S&P 600 indices: AK Steel Holding Corporation; Allegheny Technologies Incorporated; A.M. Castle & Co.; Carpenter Technology Corporation; Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.; Commercial Metals Company; Nucor Corporation; Olympic Steel, Inc.; Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; United States Steel Corporation; and Worthington Industries.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about purchases made by, or on behalf of, Worthington Industries Inc. or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b – 18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)1934) of common shares of Worthington Industries Inc. during each month of the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010:2011:

 

Period

  Total Number
of Common
Shares
    Purchased    
  Average
Price Paid
per Common
Share
  Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
  Maximum Number
of Common Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

(1)

March 1-31, 2010

  12,137(2)  $17.41      -      8,449,500

April 1-30, 2010

  -    -      -      8,449,500

May 1-31, 2010

  66,982(2)  $15.96      -      8,449,500
             

Total

  79,119   $16.18      -      8,449,500

Period

  Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Common
Share
   Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
   Maximum Number
of Common Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

(1)
 

March 1-31, 2011

   37,000(2)  $19.75     -     3,194,802  

April 1-30, 2011

   2,704,962(2)  $21.35     2,700,000     494,802  

May 1-31, 2011

   -    -     -     494,802  
                

Total

   2,741,962   $21.33     2,700,000    

 

(1)

The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of common shares that could be purchased under the publicly announced repurchase authorization then in effect. On September 26, 2007, Worthington Industrieswe announced that theour Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries’ outstanding common shares. A total of 8,449,500494,802 common shares were available under this repurchase authorization as of May 31, 2010. The common shares available for repurchase under this authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other appropriate factors. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.2011.

On June 29, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries’ outstanding common shares, increasing the total number of common shares available for repurchase to 10,494,802.

The common shares available for repurchase under these authorizations may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other appropriate factors. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

(2)

ReflectsIncludes an aggregate of 37,000 common shares tenderedand 4,962 common shares surrendered by employees in March and April 2011, respectively, to cover the costmeet tax withholdings upon exercise of exercisingstock options. These common shares were not part of the 10,000,000 share repurchase authorization noted above.in effect throughout fiscal 2011.

The Company has begun to repurchase common shares under this authorization during the first quarter of the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note U – Subsequent Events” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding common share repurchase activity subsequent to May 31, 2010.

Item 6. — Selected Financial Data

 

 Fiscal Year Ended May 31,  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(in thousands, except per share) 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 

FINANCIAL RESULTS

          

Net sales

 $1,943,034   $2,631,267   $3,067,161   $2,971,808   $2,897,179   $2,442,624   $1,943,034   $2,631,267   $3,067,161   $2,971,808  

Cost of goods sold

  1,663,104    2,456,533    2,711,414    2,610,176    2,525,545    2,086,467    1,663,104    2,456,533    2,711,414    2,610,176  
                              

Gross margin

  279,930    174,734    355,747    361,632    371,634    356,157    279,930    174,734    355,747    361,632  

Selling, general and administrative expense

  218,315    210,046    231,602    232,487    214,030    235,198    218,315    210,046    231,602    232,487  

Impairment of long-lived assets

  35,409    96,943    -    -    -    4,386    35,409    96,943    -    -  

Restructuring and other expense

  4,243    43,041    18,111    -    -    2,653    4,243    43,041    18,111    -  

Joint venture transactions

  (10,436  -    -    -    -  
                              

Operating income (loss)

  21,963    (175,296  106,034    129,145    157,604    124,356    21,963    (175,296  106,034    129,145  

Miscellaneous income (expense)

  1,127    (2,329  620    963    4,564    597    1,127    (2,329  620    963  

Gain on sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates

  -    8,331    -    -    26,609  

Gain on sale of investment in Aegis

  -    -    8,331    -    -  

Interest expense

  (9,534  (20,734  (21,452  (21,895  (26,279  (18,756  (9,534  (20,734  (21,452  (21,895

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  64,601    48,589    67,459    63,213    56,339    76,333    64,601    48,589    67,459    63,213  
                              

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  78,157    (141,439  152,661    171,426    218,837    182,530    78,157    (141,439  152,661    171,426  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  26,650    (37,754  38,616    52,112    66,759    58,496    26,650    (37,754  38,616    52,112  
                              

Net earnings (loss)

  51,507    (103,685  114,045    119,314    152,078    124,034    51,507    (103,685  114,045    119,314  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  6,266    4,529    6,968    5,409    6,088    8,968    6,266    4,529    6,968    5,409  
                              

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 $45,241   $(108,214 $107,077   $113,905   $145,990   $115,066   $45,241   $(108,214 $107,077   $113,905  
                              

Earnings (loss) per share – diluted:

          

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

 $0.57   $(1.37 $1.31   $1.31   $1.64   $1.53   $0.57   $(1.37 $1.31   $1.31  
                              

Depreciation and amortization

 $64,653   $64,073   $63,413   $61,469   $59,116   $61,058   $64,653   $64,073   $63,413   $61,469  

Capital expenditures (including acquisitions and investments)

  98,275    109,491    97,343    90,418    66,904    59,891    98,275    109,491    97,343    90,418  

Cash dividends declared

  31,676    48,115    54,640    58,380    60,110    29,411    31,676    48,115    54,640    58,380  

Per common share

 $0.40   $0.61   $0.68   $0.68   $0.68   $0.40   $0.40   $0.61   $0.68   $0.68  

Average common shares outstanding –diluted

  79,143    78,903    81,898    87,002    88,976  

Average common shares outstanding – diluted

  75,409    79,143    78,903    81,898    87,002  

FINANCIAL POSITION

          

Current assets

 $782,285   $598,935   $1,104,970   $969,383   $996,241  

Current liabilities

  379,802    372,080    664,895    420,494    490,786  

Total current assets

 $891,635   $782,285   $598,935   $1,104,970   $969,383  

Total current liabilities

  525,002    379,802    372,080    664,895    420,494  
                              

Working capital

 $402,483   $226,855   $440,075   $548,889   $505,455   $366,633   $402,483   $226,855   $440,075   $548,889  
                              

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $506,163   $521,505   $549,944   $564,265   $546,904   $405,334   $506,163   $521,505   $549,944   $564,265  

Total assets

  1,520,347    1,363,829    1,988,031    1,814,182    1,900,397    1,667,249    1,520,347    1,363,829    1,988,031    1,814,182  

Total debt

  250,238    239,393    380,450    276,650    252,684    383,210    250,238    239,393    380,450    276,650  

Total shareholders’ equity – controlling interest

  711,413    706,069    885,377    936,001    945,306    689,910    711,413    706,069    885,377    936,001  

Per share

 $8.98   $8.94   $11.16   $11.02   $10.66   $9.62   $8.98   $8.94   $11.16   $11.02  

Common shares outstanding

  79,217    78,998    79,308    84,908    88,691    71,684    79,217    78,998    79,308    84,908  

Our Automotive Body Panels operations have been excluded from consolidated operating results since their deconsolidation in May 2011. Our Metal Framing operations have been excluded from consolidated operating results since their deconsolidation in March 2011, except for our Metal Framing operations in Canada, which have been excluded since their disposition in November 2009. The acquisition of the net assets of three MISA Metals, Inc. steel processing locations has been reflected since March 2011. The acquisition of our 60% interest in Nitin Cylinders Limited has been reflected since December 2010. The acquisition of the net assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. has been reflected since June 2010. The acquisition of the steel processing assets of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries has been reflected since February 2010. Our Metal Framing operations in Canada have been excluded since their disposition in November 2009. The acquisition of the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC has been reflected since September 2009. The acquisition of the net assets related to the businesses of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. has been reflected since June 2009. The acquisition of the net assets of Laser Products assets has been reflected since July 2008. The acquisition of the net assets of The Sharon Companies Ltd. assets has been reflected since June 2008. The acquisition of the capital stock of Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. has been reflected since August 2006.

Item 7. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Selected statements contained in this “Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based, in whole or in part, on management’s beliefs, estimates, assumptions and currently available information. For a more detailed discussion of what constitutes a forward-looking statement and of some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, please refer to the “Safe Harbor Statement” in the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Part I – Item 1A. – Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Introduction

Worthington Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or the “Company”), is primarily a diversified metals processing company, focused on value-added steel processing and manufactured metal products. Our manufactured metal products include: pressure cylinder products such as propane, refrigerant, oxygen, hand torch and campingindustrial cylinders, scuba tanks, hand torches, and helium balloon kits; light gauge steel framing for commercial and residential construction; framing systems and stairs for mid-rise buildings; currentsteel pallets and past model automotive service stampings;racks; and, through joint ventures, suspension grid systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilingsceilings; laser-welded blanks; light gauge steel framing for commercial and laser welded blanks.residential construction; and current and past model automotive service stampings. Our number one goal is to increase shareholder value, which we seek to accomplish by optimizing existing operations, developing and commercializing new products and applications, and pursuing strategic acquisitions and joint ventures.

As of May 31, 2010,2011, excluding our joint ventures, we operated 4135 manufacturing facilities worldwide, principally in three reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Metal Framing. OtherFraming, each of which is comprised of a similar group of products and services. As more fully described in theRecent Business Developmentssection herein, on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of Dietrich Metal Framing (“Dietrich”) to a newly-formed joint venture, Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”), in which we received a 25% noncontrolling interest. We retained seven of the 13 metal framing facilities, which continue to operate, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. The financial results and operating performance of the retained facilities will continue to be reported within our Metal Framing operating segment until their expected disposition in fiscal 2012. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, will continue to be reported within Metal Framing on a historical basis.

Operating segments whichthat do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria or materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure, includeas well as other corporate-related entities, are combined and presented in an “Other” category for segment reporting purposes. Through May 9, 2011, the operating segments included within the Other category consisted of Automotive Body Panels, Steel Packaging, and the recently formed Worthington Global Group (the “Global Group”). As more fully described in theRecent Business Developments section herein, on May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels subsidiary, The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”), to the ArtiFlex joint venture, and the resulting deconsolidation of the contributed net assets, we no longer maintain a separate Automotive Body Panels operating segment. Accordingly, in periods subsequent to May 9, 2011, the operating segments included within the Other category consist of Steel Packaging and the Global Group. We will continue to report the financial results and operating performance of our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment on a historical basis through May 9, 2011.

The Global Group operating segment was formed during the third quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (“fiscal 2011”) as a result of certain organizational changes impacting the internal reporting and management structure of our then Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs. Stairs operating segments. Refer to “Note M – Segment Data” for additional information regarding the Global Group operating segment.

We also held equity positions in eight12 joint ventures, which operated an additional 2443 manufacturing facilities worldwide as of May 31, 2010.2011. For more information onregarding our operating segments, please refer to “Part I – Item 1. – Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

During fiscal 2011, we continued to benefit from the strengthening of the automotive market as well as the improving overall general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, that began in the latter part of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”), we began. Although the construction market remains depressed compared to recoverhistorical norms, there has been a break from the global recession that, from an earnings perspective, resulted in our fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”) being the worst in our Company’s history. The recession negatively affected automotive production, particularly for General Motorsfurther erosion and Chrysler, as they both filed for bankruptcy protection in calendar 2009. However, since the settlement of the bankruptcies, automotive production seems to have stabilized and shownsome signs of strengthening, providing for some of the recovery instability. Recent acquisitions by both our Steel Processing operating segment. In addition, we acquired the steel processing assets of Gibraltar Industries, Inc., which have been fully integrated into our Steel Processing operating segment and generated positive earnings since the acquisition.

In our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, the global recession had the most impact onsegments have produced solid results and proven complementary to our industrial gas, air brake and forklift product lines. The industrial gas and air brake cylinders are the primary products inexisting businesses as have our European operations, which have suffered through the recession. However, during fiscal 2010, we continued to see strong demand across mostrecently formed joint ventures. Continued execution of the other cylinder product lines; and, toward the end of the year, we began to see some modest improvement in our European operations. During fiscal 2010, we completed two acquisitions in the Pressure Cylinders operating segment, as noted below, which increased our product offerings.

Activity in the construction market continues to be stagnant. The recession in the construction market has not only affected our Metal Framing operating segment, but also the operations of our previously reported Construction Services operating segment. Lower projections in these segments led to the

impairment of Metal Framing’s goodwill in fiscal 2009 and the impairment of Construction Services’ goodwill and certain other of its intangible assets in fiscal 2010. The Metal Framing operating segment has been challenged for more than a year with weak demand. Volumes were down 39% from fiscal 2009 and 58% from the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”). We have responded by sizing the business to keep pace with the current demand by closing facilities and reducing headcount. In addition to reducing costs, we introduced a new flat-rolled steel product, ProStud™, during fiscal 2010. This provides us with an additional product that will hopefully improve sales and capture market share. Our joint ventures continue to perform well, despite weak market conditions.

Much of our response to the recession has been driven by the Transformation Plan (the “Transformation Plan”), which began in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, prior to the beginning of the recession. We continued to execute our Transformation Plan through fiscal 2010. In our Steel Processing operating segment, we have completed the diagnostic and implementation phases at each of our core facilities. Additionally, we have initiated the diagnostic process at our west coast stainless steel operation and our newly acquired facility in Cleveland, as well as in our Mexican joint venture, Serviacero. We anticipate that we will have substantially completed the Transformation Plan process at these facilities and one additional Steel Processing facility by December 31, 2010. In our Metal Framing operating segment, we have substantially completed the Transformation Plan process at eight facilities and anticipate completing the process at four additional facilities by December 31, 2010. We expect to incur additional restructuring charges relating to the Transformation Plan as we progress through the remaining Metal Framing and Steel Processing facilities, although these charges should decline over the coming quarters. The need for other restructuring charges will depend largely on recommendations developed from the Transformation Plan. We believe that the Transformation Plan has lowered the break-even points ofenhanced efficiencies at our facilities and has positioned us to respond more quickly to current and future opportunities and challenges.

Market & Industry Overview

No singleWe sell our products and services to a diverse customer contributed more than 10%base and a broad range of end markets. The breakdown of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010. Our consolidated net sales breakdown by end user market is illustrated by the following chart. Substantially all of the net sales of our Metal Framing, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction, and Commercial Stairs operating segments, as well as approximately 16% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment, are to the construction market, both residential and non-residential. While the market price of steel significantly impacts this business, there are other key indicators that are meaningful in analyzing construction market demand including the United States of America gross domestic product (“U.S. GDP”), the Dodge Index of construction contracts and trends in the relative price of framing lumber and steel. Construction is also the predominant end market for our joint venture, Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”). The net sales of WAVE are not consolidated in our results; however, adding our ownership percentage of joint venture net sales to our reported net sales would not materially change the consolidated net sales breakdownfiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 is illustrated in the following chart.chart:

The automotive industry is the largest consumer of flat-rolled steel and thus the largest end market for our Steel Processing operating segment. Approximately 46%49% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment, and substantially all of the net sales of our Automotive Body Panels operating segment are to the automotive market. North American vehicle production, primarily by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors (the “Detroit Three automakers”), has a considerable impact on the activity within these twothis operating segments.segment. The majority of the net sales from four of our unconsolidated joint ventures are also to the automotive end market. These

As noted in “Part I – Item 1A. – Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe that the damage caused by the earthquake and resulting tsunami that struck Japan on March 11, 2011, has caused disruptions in and negatively impacted many of the markets we serve. As the impact from this catastrophe continues to evolve, we are currently unable to determine how deep or how long the impact will be on each of our markets. We continue to monitor the situation and are prepared to act as outcomes become more evident.

Substantially all of the net sales of our Metal Framing and Global Group operating segments, as well as approximately 11% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment, are to the construction market, both residential and non-residential. We estimate that approximately 10% of our net sales to the

construction market are to the residential sector. While the market price of steel significantly impacts these businesses, there are other key indicators that are meaningful in analyzing construction market demand, including U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”), the Dodge Index of construction contracts and trends in the relative price of framing lumber and steel. The construction market is also the predominant end market of two of our joint ventures, Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”) and ClarkDietrich, whose net sales are not consolidatedincluded in our results; however, adding our ownership percentage of joint venture net sales to our reported net sales would not materially change the consolidated net sales breakdown in the above chart.operating results.

The net sales of our Pressure Cylinders and Steel Packaging operating segments and approximately 38%40% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment are to other markets such as leisure and recreation, industrial gas, HVAC, lawn and garden, agriculture and appliance. Given the many different product linesproducts that make up these net sales and the wide variety of end markets, it is very difficult to detail the key market indicators that drive this portion of our business. However, we believe that the trend in U.S. GDP is generally a good economic indicator for analyzing this activity.the performance of these operating segments.

We use the following information to monitor our costs and demand in our major end markets:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31,  Inc / (Dec) 
       2010          2009          2008      2010 vs.
2009
  2009 vs.
2008
 

U.S. GDP (% growth year-over-year)

   0.1  -1.0  2.4  1.1  -3.4

Hot-Rolled Steel ($ per ton)1

  $549   $726   $636   $(177 $90  

Detroit Three Auto Build (000s vehicles)2

   5,650    5,606    8,643    44    (3,037

No. America Auto Build (000s vehicles)2

   10,643    9,880    14,662    763    (4,782

Dodge Index

   89    98    130    (9  (32

Framing Lumber ($ per 1,000 board ft)3

  $271   $230   $269   $41   $(39

Zinc ($ per pound)4

  $0.94   $0.65   $1.24   $0.29   $(0.59

Natural Gas ($ per mcf)5

  $4.35   $7.02   $7.66   $(2.67 $(0.64

Retail Diesel Prices, All types ($ per gallon)6

  $2.77   $3.17   $3.41   $(0.40 $(0.24
   Fiscal Year Ended May 31,  Inc / (Dec) 
       2011          2010          2009      2011 vs.
2010
  2010 vs.
2009
 

U.S. GDP (% growth year-over-year)1

   2.7  0.1  -1.0  2.6  1.1

Hot-Rolled Steel ($ per ton)2

  $680   $549   $726   $131   ($177

Detroit Three Auto Build (000s vehicles)3

   7,251    5,650    5,606    1,601    44  

No. America Auto Build (000s vehicles)3

   12,756    10,643    9,880    2,113    763  

Zinc ($ per pound)4

  $1.00   $0.94   $0.65   $0.06   $0.29  

Natural Gas ($ per mcf)5

  $4.14   $4.35   $7.02   ($0.21 ($2.67

On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices ($ per gallon)6

  $3.35   $2.77   $3.17   $0.58   ($0.40

 

1 2011 figures based on revised actuals    2 CRU Index; annual average    23 CSM Autobase3 Random Lengths; annual average    4 LME Zinc; annual average    5 NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas; annual average    6 Energy Information Administration; annual average (excludes taxes)

U.S. GDP growth rate trends are generally indicative of the strength in demand and, in many cases, pricing for our products. Historically,A year-over-year increase in U.S. GDP growth rates is indicative of a stronger economy, which generally increases demand and pricing for our products. Conversely, decreasing U.S. GDP growth rates generally indicate the opposite effect, which we have seen that year-over-year increasingexperienced during the first six months of fiscal 2010. Changes in U.S. GDP growth rates can also signal or be indicative of, changes in conversion costs related to production and in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A expenses”&A”). Conversely, expenses. The fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 is the opposite is also generally true. Decreasessixth quarter in a row of positive year-over-year change in U.S. GDP growth rates can signal negative trends in our results, as a weaker economy generally reduces demand and pricing for our products.GDP.

In recent years, the

The market price of hot-rolled steel has beenis one of the most significant factors impacting our selling prices and has materially impacted earnings, particularly on a quarter to quarter basis.operating results. When steel prices fall, we typically have higher-priced material flowing through cost of goods sold, while selling prices compress to what the market will bear, negatively impacting our results. On the other hand, in a rising price environment, our results are generally favorably impacted, as lower-priced material purchased in previous periods flows through cost of goods sold, while our selling prices increase at a faster pace to cover current replacement costs. The following table showspresents the average quarterly market price per ton of hot-rolled steel for the last twoduring fiscal years.2011 and fiscal 2010.

 

(dollars per ton1)                          
  Fiscal Year          Inc / (Dec)            Fiscal Year   Inc / (Dec) 
      2010          2009      2010 vs. 2009       2011           2010           2011 vs. 2010     

1st Quarter

  $439  $1,067  $(628 -58.9  $611    $439    $172     39.2

2nd Quarter

  $538  $873  $(335 -38.4  $557    $538    $19     3.5

3rd Quarter

  $549  $527  $22   4.2  $699    $549    $150     27.3

4th Quarter

  $669  $437  $232   53.1  $851    $669    $182     27.2

Annual Avg.

  $549  $726  $(177 -24.4  $680    $549    $131     23.9

 

1 CRU Hot-Rolled Index

The Dodge Index representsNo single customer contributed more than 10% of our consolidated net sales during fiscal 2011. While our automotive business is largely driven by the value of total construction contracts, including residential and non-residential building construction. This overall index serves as a broad indicatorproduction schedules of the construction marketsDetroit Three automakers, our customer base is much broader and includes other domestic manufacturers and many of their suppliers. During fiscal 2011, we continued to build upon the improvement in which we participate, as it tracks actual construction starts. The relative priceautomotive production from the Detroit Three automakers that began in the latter part of framing lumber, an alternative construction material against which we compete, can also affect our Metal Framing operating segment, as certain applications may permitfiscal 2010. Vehicle production for the use of this alternative building material.

Detroit Three automakers during fiscal 2011 was up 28% over fiscal 2010. Additionally, North American vehicle production during fiscal 2011 was up 20% over fiscal 2010.

The market trends of certainCertain other commodities, such as zinc, natural gas and diesel fuel, can be important to us as they represent a significant portion of our cost of goods sold, both directly through our plant operations and indirectly through transportation and freight expense.

Fiscal 2010Recent Business Developments

 

On JuneJuly 1, 2009, we2011, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment purchased substantially all of the net assets of the BernzOmatic business (“Bernz”) from Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (the “Seller”), for cash consideration of approximately $51.0 million. The assets purchased include substantially all of the operating assets of Bernz, including machinery and equipment, intellectual property, inventories and the Bernz-owned facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. We will lease the Medina, New York facility from the Seller. Additionally, accounts receivable as of the closing date are being retained by the Seller. Foreign inventories and operations will transition to us over a period of approximately 90 days. We also generally assumed the trade accounts payable of Bernz arising in the ordinary course of business as of the closing date.

On May 9, 2011, our automotive body panels subsidiary, Gerstenslager, closed an agreement with International Tooling Solutions, LLC, a tooling design and build company, to combine their businesses in a newly-formed joint venture. This new joint venture, ArtiFlex, provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. Our investment in ArtiFlex is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ArtiFlex, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective May 9, 2011.

On March 18, 2011, we joined with Gestamp Renewables group to create Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC, a 50%-owned joint venture focused on producing towers for wind turbines being

constructed in North America. This unconsolidated joint venture has identified Cheyenne, Wyoming as the site of its initial production facility. We anticipate contributing $9.5 million of cash to the Gestamp JV, mostly in fiscal 2012. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

On March 1, 2011, we closed an agreement with Marubeni-Itochu Steel America Inc. (“MISA”) to combine certain assets of Dietrich and ClarkWestern Building Systems in a newly-created joint venture. In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 25% interest in the new joint venture, ClarkDietrich, as well as the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. (“MMI”) steel processing locations, some of which were subsequently classified as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet. Our contribution to ClarkDietrich consisted of our metal framing business, including all of the related working capital and six of the 13 facilities. We retained and continue to operate the businessesremaining facilities, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc.the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. Our investment in ClarkDietrich is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ClarkDietrich, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011.

On December 28, 2010, we acquired a 60% ownership interest in Nitin Cylinders Limited, which is now Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), for cash consideration of approximately $21.2 million. WNCL is a manufacturer of high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed industrial gases and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. (collectively, “Piper”). These assets have been includedcompressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles. The results of this joint venture are consolidated in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notessegment due to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE P – Acquisitions” for more information.

On July 13, 2009, the Serviacero Worthington joint venture opened its greenfield steel processing facility near Monterrey, Mexico. The 65,000 square foot facility, with rail access, currently operates a slitting and packaging line.

On August 12, 2009, our Metal Framing operating segment announced the formation of a joint venture with ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc., to co-develop the new ProSTUDTM drywall framing product. The components of the product are lightweight and feature a number of technological advances to enhance rigidity.

On September 3, 2009, the Pressure Cylinders operating segment purchased the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC (“SCI”). SCI produces lightweight, aluminum-lined, composite-wrapped high pressure cylinders which enhanced the Pressure Cylinders operating segment’s growing product line. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE P – Acquisitions” for more information.

On September 30, 2009, we announced the consolidation, within our Metal Framing operating segment, of our Joliet, Illinois, roll forming operations into our Hammond, Indiana, facility.controlling financial interest.

 

On November 2, 2009,19, 2010, we joined with Hubei Modern Urban Construction and Development Group Co., Ltd. (“HMUCG”) of China to create Worthington Modern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co. Ltd (“WMSFMCo.”). We contributed approximately $6.2 million of cash in exchange for our Metal Framing operating segment formed40% ownership interest in the joint venture. The purpose of WMSFMCo. is to design, manufacture, assemble and distribute steel framing materials and accessories for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and to provide project management and building design and construction supply services for those projects. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a strategic alliance with Bailey Metal Products Limited (“Bailey”) that included the sale of our Metal Framing operations in Canada to Bailey. The alliance provides for Bailey to be the exclusive distributor of Metal Framing’s proprietary and vinyl products in Canada, and Bailey has licensed its paper-faced metal corner bead product to Metal Framing to manufacture and sell in most of the United States.controlling financial interest.

 

On February 1,June 21, 2010, the Steel Processingour Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired, for cash consideration of $12.2 million, the steel processingnet assets of Gibraltar Industries,Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”), which manufactured extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial specialty and its subsidiaries (the “Gibraltar Assets”).professional racing applications. The acquisition expands the capabilitiesassets of Hy-Mark have been moved to our existing cold-rolled strip business and our ability to service the needs of new and existing customers. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE P – Acquisitions” for more information.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under our revolving creditpressure cylinders facility and amounts then outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility.located in Mississippi.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $2,442.6    100.0 $1,943.0    100.0 $499.6  

Cost of goods sold

   2,086.4    85.4  1,663.1    85.6  423.3  
               

Gross margin

   356.2    14.6  279.9    14.4  76.3  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   235.2    9.6  218.3    11.2  16.9  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   4.4    0.2  35.4    1.8  (31.0

Restructuring and other expense

   2.6    0.1  4.2    0.2  (1.6

Joint venture transactions

   (10.4  0.4  -    0.0  (10.4
               

Operating income

   124.4    5.1  22.0    1.1  102.4  

Miscellaneous income

   0.6    0.0  1.1    0.1  (0.5

Interest expense

   (18.8  -0.8  (9.5  -0.5  9.3  

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

   76.3    3.1  64.6    3.3  11.7  

Income tax expense

   (58.5  -2.4  (26.7  -1.4  31.8  
               

Net earnings

   124.0    5.1  51.5    2.7  72.5  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

   (8.9  -0.4  (6.3  -0.3  (2.6
               

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

  $115.1    4.7 $45.2    2.3 $69.9  
               

Net earnings represent the results for our consolidated operations, including 100% of our consolidated joint ventures, Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”) and WNCL. The noncontrolling interest, or 48% of Spartan and 40% of WNCL, is subtracted to arrive at net earnings attributable to controlling interest (i.e., Worthington). For fiscal 2011, net earnings attributable to controlling interest were $115.1 million, an increase of $69.9 million from fiscal 2010.

Net sales increased $499.6 million from fiscal 2010 to $2,442.6 million. Higher volumes increased net sales by $271.3 million, most notably in our Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments. Additionally, average selling prices increased over the prior fiscal year due to the higher cost of steel, favorably impacting net sales by $228.3 million in fiscal 2011. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $680 per ton for fiscal 2011 as compared to an average of $549 per ton for fiscal 2010 (an increase of 24%).

Gross margin improved $76.3 million from fiscal 2010. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to increased volumes in our Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, as well as an increase in the spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel, most notably in Steel Processing.

SG&A expense increased $16.9 million from fiscal 2010, primarily due to the impact of acquisitions and higher profit sharing and bonus expense, driven by the increase in net earnings during fiscal 2011.

Impairment charges decreased $31.0 million from fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 impairment charges of $4.4 million were comprised of the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Global Group operating segment ($2.5 million) and our Steel Packaging operating segment ($1.9 million). This

compares to impairment charges of $35.4 million in fiscal 2010, consisting primarily of the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of our Commercial Stairs business unit reported as part of our then Construction Services operating segment ($32.7 million) as well as the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment ($2.7 million). For additional information regarding these impairment charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets.”

Restructuring and other expense decreased $1.6 million from fiscal 2010. Substantially all of the activity in both fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was associated with the Transformation Plan, which continued to progress through the remaining steel processing facilities as well as the metal framing facilities that are now part of ClarkDietrich. Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2011 consisted primarily of employee severance and facility exit costs. Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2010 also consisted of employee severance and facility exit costs as well as professional fees. For additional information regarding these restructuring charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note D – Restructuring and Other Expense.”

Fiscal 2011 operating income was also favorably impacted by a one-time net gain of $10.4 million related to the contribution of certain net assets to our newly formed joint ventures, Artiflex and ClarkDietrich, and the corresponding deconsolidations of Gerstenslager and Dietrich. A one-time gain of approximately $8.6 million was recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Gerstenslager, which was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $6.4 million related to certain long-lived assets retained in the transaction. Similarly, a one-time gain of approximately $1.8 million was recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Dietrich, which was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $18.3 million and restructuring charges of approximately $11.2 million incurred in connection with the metal framing facilities retained. We continue to operate these facilities, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Interest expense increased $9.3 million from fiscal 2010 primarily due to higher interest rates as a result of the April 2010 issuance of 6.50% notes due April 15, 2020 with an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. Higher debt levels driven by acquisitions, share repurchases and increased working capital needs also contributed to the increase in interest expense in fiscal 2011.

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates increased $11.7 million from fiscal 2010. The majority of our equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates is attributed to our WAVE joint venture, where net income increased 7% from fiscal 2010. Four other joint ventures, TWB Company, Worthington Specialty Processing, Serviacero Worthington and Samuel Steel Pickling all contributed earnings and showed a combined improvement of $5.1 million over fiscal 2010. ClarkDietrich also contributed to the fiscal 2011 increase, providing $2.1 million of equity income since its formation on March 1, 2011. For additional information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates.”

Income tax expense increased $31.8 million from fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest of 33.7% versus 37.1% in fiscal 2010. These rates are calculated based on net earnings attributable to controlling interest, as reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings. The decrease in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was due primarily to (i) various changes in the estimated valuation of deferred

taxes, including a $3.0 million valuation allowance recorded during fiscal 2010 related to net operating losses previously reported in state income tax filings, and (ii) the change in the mix of income among the jurisdictions in which we do business, partially offset by the impact of a fiscal 2010 tax benefit associated with the previously mentioned impairment charges. The 33.7% rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily as a result of the benefits from lower tax rates on foreign income and the qualified production activities deduction (collectively decreasing the rate by 4.1%). These impacts were partially offset by state and local income taxes of 2.8% (net of their federal tax benefit). For additional information regarding the deviation from statutory income tax rates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note K – Income Taxes.”

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table summarizes the operating results of our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,405.5    100.0 $989.0    100.0 $416.5  

Cost of goods sold

   1,216.5    86.6  853.2    86.3  363.3  
               

Gross margin

   189.0    13.4  135.8    13.7  53.2  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   111.6    7.9  84.9    8.6  26.7  

Restructuring and other income

   (0.3  0.0  (0.5  -0.1  0.2  
               

Operating income

  $77.7    5.5 $51.4    5.2 $26.3  
               

Material cost

  $1,001.9    $685.3    $316.6  

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,589     2,055     534  

Net sales and operating income highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased by $416.5 million from fiscal 2010 to $1,405.5 million. Direct and toll volume increased 25% and 27%, respectively, accounting for $256.3 million of the increase in net sales during fiscal 2011. The increase in volume was driven by stronger economic conditions, especially in the automotive end market. Additionally, higher base material prices in fiscal 2011 led to increased pricing for our products, favorably impacting net sales by $160.2 million over fiscal 2010.

Operating income increased by $26.3 million from fiscal 2010 to $77.7 million. Higher volumes, aided by the impact of acquisitions, improved operating income by $53.9 million. The impact of higher volumes, however, was partially offset by higher manufacturing expenses. Additionally, SG&A expense increased $26.7 million during fiscal 2011 due to higher profit sharing and bonus expenses, the impact of acquisitions and an increase in the portion of allocated corporate expenses.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table summarizes the operating results of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2011   % of
Net sales
  2010   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $591.9     100.0 $467.6     100.0 $124.3  

Cost of goods sold

   474.8     80.2  376.0     80.4  98.8  
                 

Gross margin

   117.1     19.8  91.6     19.6  25.5  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   68.1     11.5  61.2     13.1  6.9  

Restructuring and other expense

   -     0.0  0.3     0.1  (0.3
                 

Operating income

  $49.0     8.3 $30.1     6.4 $18.9  
                 

Material cost

  $273.9     $208.3     $65.6  

Units shipped (in thousands)

   59,037      55,436      3,601  

Net sales and operating income highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased by $124.3 million from fiscal 2010 to $591.9 million. Higher volumes increased net sales by $92.2 million driven by the continued recovery in the European industrial gas and automotive markets, stable market conditions in our North American operations and the impact of acquisitions. Additionally, higher overall pricing for our products increased net sales by $32.1 million over fiscal 2010.

Operating income increased $18.9 million from fiscal 2010 to $49.0 million. Strong results from our North American operations, and the improvement and return to profitability of our European operations were the primary drivers of the increase in fiscal 2011 operating income. SG&A expense increased $6.9 million in fiscal 2011 mainly due to higher profit sharing and bonus expenses, the impact of acquisitions and an increase in the portion of allocated corporate expenses.

Metal Framing

The following table summarizes the operating results of our Metal Framing operating segment for the periods indicated. The operating results of the net assets contributed to ClarkDietrich are included through March 1, 2011, the date they were deconsolidated.

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $249.5    100.0 $330.6    100.0 $(81.1

Cost of goods sold

   225.8    90.5  294.6    89.1  (68.8
               

Gross margin

   23.7    9.5  36.0    10.9  (12.3

Selling, general and administrative expense

   31.6    12.7  42.3    12.8  (10.7

Restructuring and other expense

   1.4    0.6  3.9    1.2  (2.5

Joint venture transactions

   (1.8  0.7  -    0.0  1.8  
               

Operating loss

  $(7.5  -3.0 $(10.2  -3.1 $2.7  
               

Material cost

  $161.0    $200.2    $(39.2

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   184     278     (94

Net sales and operating loss highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased by $81.1 million from fiscal 2010 to $249.5 million. A 34% decline in volumes, driven by the contribution of our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich as well as depressed levels of demand in the commercial and residential construction markets, reduced net sales by $111.9 million. Higher base material prices led to increased pricing for our products, favorably impacting net sales by $30.8 million.

Operating loss decreased $2.7 million from fiscal 2010 to $7.5 million. Gross margin decreased $12.3 million in fiscal 2011 driven by lower volumes due to the contribution of our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich as well as depressed levels of demand. The impact of the decrease in gross margin during fiscal 2011 was partially offset by a $10.7 million decrease in SG&A expense, also driven by lower volumes.

Additionally, a one-time net gain of $1.8 million recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of certain net assets of Dietrich also favorably impacted fiscal 2011 operating results. This gain was recorded net of impairment and restructuring charges incurred in connection with certain metal framing facilities retained of $18.3 million and $11.2 million, respectively. We continue to operate these facilities, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Other

The Other category includes our Steel Packaging and Global Group operating segments, which do not meet the materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure, as well as certain income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments. The Other category also includes the results of our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment, on a historical basis, through May 9, 2011.

The following table summarizes the operating results of the Other category for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $195.6    100.0 $155.9    100.0 $39.7  

Cost of goods sold

   169.3    86.6  139.5    89.5  29.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   26.3    13.4  16.4    10.5  9.9  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   23.6    12.1  29.8    19.1  (6.2

Impairment of long-lived assets

   4.4    2.2  35.4    22.7  (31.0

Restructuring and other expense

   1.6    0.8  0.5    0.3  1.1  

Joint venture transactions

   (8.6  4.4  -     (8.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  $5.3    2.7 $(49.3  -31.6 $54.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales and operating income (loss) highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $39.7 million in fiscal 2011 to $195.6 million, as volumes across all operating segments increased. Construction-related business units within the Global Group operating segment, however, continue to be negatively affected by the weakness in the commercial construction.

Operating income improved $54.6 million from fiscal 2010 to $5.3 million. An increase in gross margin during fiscal 2011, aided by improvements in most operating segments, favorably impacted operating income by $9.9 million. Additionally, impairment charges decreased $31.0 million from fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 impairment charges of $4.4 million were comprised of the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Global Group operating segment ($2.5 million) and our Steel Packaging operating segment ($1.9 million). This compares to impairment charges of $35.4 million in fiscal 2010, consisting primarily of the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of our previously reported Construction Services operating segment ($32.7 million) as well as the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment ($2.7 million).

Fiscal 2011 operating income was also favorably impacted by a one-time net gain of $8.6 million recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Gerstenslager. This gain was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $6.4 million related to certain long-lived assets of Gerstenslager that were retained. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A –Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Fiscal 2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2010  % of
Net sales
  2009  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,943.0    100.0 $2,631.3    100.0 $(688.3

Cost of goods sold

   1,663.1    85.6  2,456.6    93.4  (793.5
               

Gross margin

   279.9    14.4  174.7    6.6  105.2  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   218.3    11.2  210.0    8.0  8.3  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   35.4    1.8  97.0    3.7  (61.6

Restructuring and other expense

   4.2    0.2  43.0    1.6  (38.8
               

Operating income (loss)

   22.0    1.1  (175.3  -6.7  197.3  

Miscellaneous income (expense)

   1.1    0.1  (2.4  -0.1  (3.5

Gain on sale of investment in Aegis Metal Framing, LLC

   -    0.0  8.3    0.3  (8.3

Interest expense

   (9.5  -0.5  (20.7  -0.8  (11.2

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

   64.6    3.3  48.6    1.8  16.0  

Income tax (expense) benefit

   (26.7  -1.4  37.8    1.4  64.5  
               

Net earnings (loss)

   51.5    2.7  (103.7  -3.9  155.2  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

   (6.3  -0.3  (4.5  -0.2  (1.8
               

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

  $45.2    2.3 $(108.2  -4.1 $153.4  
               

Net earnings (loss) represents the results for our consolidated operations, including 100% of our consolidated joint venture, Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), of which we own 52%. The net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest, or 48% of Spartan, is subtracted to arrive at net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest. For fiscal 2010, the net earnings attributable to controlling interest were $45.2 million for fiscal 2010, compared to a net loss attributable to controlling interest of $108.2 million for fiscal 2009.

 

Net sales in fiscal 2010 decreased $688.3 million from fiscal 2009 to $1,943.0 million. Decreased volumes, primarily in our Metal Framing operating segment and former Mid-Rise Construction and Military Construction operating segments, lowered net sales by $363.3 million. Lower average selling prices made up the remaining decrease, lowering net sales by $325.0 million. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $549 per ton for fiscal 2010 as compared to an average of $726 per ton for fiscal 2009 (down 24%).

selling prices made up the remaining decrease, lowering net sales by $325.0 million. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $549 per ton for fiscal 2010 as compared to an average of $726 per ton for fiscal 2009 (down 24%).

 

Gross margin in fiscal 2010 increased $105.2 million from fiscal 2009, and as a percent of net sales increased to 14.4% from 6.6%. This was primarily due to a $129.4 million improvement in the spread between selling prices and material costs, and $60.9 million in savings and efficiencies in manufacturing expenses, largely as a result of the Transformation Plan. The improved spread and manufacturing efficiencies were partially offset by depressed volumes, which reduced the gross margin by $85.1 million.

 

SG&A expense increased $8.3 million from fiscal 2009, largely as a result of higher profit sharing and bonus expense. Improvements in current year earnings and lower award achievement in the prior year resulted in an $18.7 million increase in fiscal 2010 expense. This was partially offset by decreased bad debt expense of $9.2 million in fiscal 2010, primarily related to large automotive customers in the Steel Processing and Automotive Body Panels operating segments emerging from bankruptcy, making payments on their accounts and no longer requiring previously established allowances due to risks of insolvency.

decreased bad debt expense of $9.2 million in fiscal 2010, primarily related to large automotive customers in the Steel Processing and Automotive Body Panels operating segments emerging from bankruptcy, making payments on their accounts and no longer requiring previously established allowances due to risks of insolvency.

 

Impairment charges of $35.4 million for fiscal 2010 represented the third quarter write-off of goodwill and impairment charges for the previously reportedformer Construction Services operating segment ($32.7 million) and the second quarter impairment of long-lived assets related to the Steel Packaging operating segment ($2.7 million). The fiscal 2009 goodwill impairment charge of $97.0 million related to the Metal Framing operating segment.segment, as the forecasted cash flows and discount rate assumptions used in valuing this operating segment were revised to reflect a weakened economy and construction market, which resulted in a valuation of the business which no longer supported the goodwill balance. The pre-tax restructuring and other expense charges of $4.2 million in fiscal 2010 and $43.0 million in fiscal 2009 related to the Transformation Plan, and included costs related to professional fees, facility closures and job reductions.

 

Interest expense of $9.5 million in fiscal 2010 declined $11.2 million from fiscal 2009 due to lower interest rates and lower average borrowings. We redeemed $118.5 million of 6.70% senior notes due December 1, 2009 (the “2009 Notes”) in June 2009, and the remaining $19.5 million of the 2009 Notes upon maturity in December 2009. The redemptions were funded by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under existing credit facilities, which carrycarried a much lower interest rate than the 2009 Notes.

 

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates of $64.6 million was largely made up of earnings from our WAVE joint venture, which were up 6%. Although WAVE is predominantly in the construction market, a majority of its sales go to the renovation sector, which hashad not been as heavily affected by the general downturn in the construction markets. Most of our other joint ventures also experienced improvements in their earnings. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note JB – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” for further information about our participation in unconsolidated joint ventures.

 

Income tax expense for fiscal 2010 was $26.7 million compared to a tax benefit of $37.8 million from the net loss in fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2010 expense represents an effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest of 37.1% versus 25.9% in fiscal 2009. These rates are calculated on net earnings or loss attributable to controlling interest, as reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings. The change in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was primarily due to the weakness in our European cylinders operations, resulting in a higher mix of domestic income, which is taxed at a higher rate relative to foreign income, and the non-deductible goodwill impairment in fiscal 2009. In addition, a $3.0 million valuation allowance was recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 against deferred tax assets, related to net operating losses previously reported in state income tax filings, of the Metal Framing operating segment.

The 37.1% rate is higher than the federal statutory rate of 35.0%, largely as a result of the change in valuation allowances, income tax accruals for tax audit resolutions and changes in estimated deferred taxes (collectively increasing the rate by 6.6%). These impacts are partiallywere offset by benefits from the qualified production activities deduction and lower tax rates on foreign income (collectively decreasing the rate by 3.7%). For additional information regarding the deviation from statutory income tax rates, see “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note DK – Income Taxes.”

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary ofsummarizes the operating results for theof our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2010  % of
Net sales
  2009  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $989.0    100.0 $1,183.0    100.0 $(194.0

Cost of goods sold

   853.2    86.3  1,167.4    98.7  (314.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   135.8    13.7  15.6    1.3  120.2  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   84.9    8.6  79.8    6.7  5.1  

Restructuring and other expense (income)

   (0.5  -0.1  3.9    0.3  (4.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  $51.4    5.2 $(68.1  -5.8 $119.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $685.3    $991.4    $(306.1

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,055     2,011     44  

Net sales and operating income (loss) highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales decreased by $194.0 million from fiscal 2009 to $989.0 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower average pricing ($217.1 million) due to the lower base prices of hot-rolled steel during fiscal 2010. Partially offsetting the decrease was stronger demand, particularly in the automotive market, as well as additional net sales resulting from the acquisition of the steel processing assets of Gibraltar AssetsIndustries, Inc. (the “Gibraltar Assets”) in fiscal 2010.

 

Operating income was $51.4 million in fiscal 2010, compared to an operating loss of $68.1 million in fiscal 2009. Stronger demand, driven by the improved economy, and a larger spread between average selling prices and material costs, along with the acquisition of the Gibraltar Assets,Gibraltar’s steel processing assets, resulted in an aggregate $119.5 million increase to operating income. SG&A expense was $5.1 million higher than in fiscal 2009, primarily due to higher profit sharing and bonus expenses, as well as the acquisition of the Gibraltar Assets, but was partially offset by a reduction in bad debt expense. Restructuring and other expense in fiscal 2009 related largely to the Transformation Plan.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary ofsummarizes the operating results for theof our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2010   % of
Net sales
  2009   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $467.6     100.0 $537.4     100.0 $(69.8

Cost of goods sold

   376.0     80.4  429.8     80.0  (53.8
                 

Gross margin

   91.6     19.6  107.6     20.0  (16.0

Selling, general and administrative expense

   61.2     13.1  45.4     8.4  15.8  

Restructuring and other expense

   0.3     0.1  1.0     0.2  (0.7
                 

Operating income

  $30.1     6.4 $61.2     11.4 $(31.1
                 

Material cost

  $208.3     $257.5     $(49.2

Units shipped (in thousands)

   55,436      47,639      7,797  

Net sales and operating income highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales of $467.6 million represented a decrease of $69.8 million from fiscal 2009. Weak demand, primarily in our European operations, and lower average selling prices were the drivers behind this decrease. The decrease in net sales was partially offset by the SCIacquisitions of Structural Composites Industries, LLC (“SCI”) and Piper acquisitions,Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. (collectively “Piper”), which took place during fiscal 2010, and contributed $43.1 million in net sales.

 

Operating income in fiscal 2010 decreased $31.1 million from fiscal 2009. An unfavorable change in the sales mix reduced gross margin by $21.4 million, while operational improvements and efficiencies in manufacturing expenses aided gross margin by $5.4 million. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales was stable at 19.6%. SG&A expenses increased $15.8 million, primarily due to the acquisitions of PiperSCI and SCI,Piper, charges and expenses related to litigation and an increased share of corporate profit sharing, bonus and other expenses.

Metal Framing

The following table presents a summary ofsummarizes the operating results for theof our Metal Framing operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2010  % of
Net sales
  2009  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $330.6    100.0 $661.0    100.0 $(330.4

Cost of goods sold

   294.6    89.1  638.1    96.5  (343.5
               

Gross margin

   36.0    10.9  22.9    3.5  13.1  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   42.3    12.8  54.9    8.3  (12.6

Goodwill impairment

   -    0.0  96.9    14.7  (96.9

Restructuring and other expense

   3.9    1.2  13.7    2.1  (9.8
               

Operating loss

  $(10.2  -3.1 $(142.6  -21.6 $132.4  
               

Material cost

  $200.2    $502.1    $(301.9

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   278     459     (181

Net sales and operating loss highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales decreased by $330.4 million from fiscal 2009 to $330.6 million. Lower volumes reduced net sales by $259.3 million, and lower average selling prices decreased net sales by $71.1 million. Lower volumes arewere largely attributable to the weak economy and depressed levels of demand in the commercial and residential construction markets. Lower average selling prices were mainly due to the lower average base prices of steel in fiscal 2010.

 

The operating loss of $10.2 million in fiscal 2010 improved from a $142.6 million operating loss in fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2009’s results included a $96.9 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the second fiscal quarter. In fiscal 2010, weak volumes were offset by lower manufacturing and SG&A expenses realized from plant closures and headcount reductions. Additionally, the spread between average selling prices and material costs improved as reductions in material costs were realized.

Other

The Other category includes the Automotive Body Panels, Steel Packaging, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs operating segments, which do not meet the materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure, along with income and expense items not allocated tofollowing table summarizes the operating segments.

The following table presents a summaryresults of operating results for the Other category for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2010  % of
Net sales
  2009  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $155.9    100.0 $249.9    100.0 $(94.0

Cost of goods sold

   139.5    89.5  221.3    88.6  (81.8
               

Gross margin

   16.4    10.5  28.6    11.4  (12.2

Selling, general and administrative expense

   29.8    19.1  29.9    12.0  (0.1

Impairment of long-lived assets

   35.4    22.7  -    0.0  35.4  

Restructuring and other expense

   0.5    0.3  24.5    9.8  (24.0
               

Operating loss

  $(49.3  -31.6 $(25.8  -10.3 $(23.5
               

Net sales and operating loss highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales decreased by $94.0 million in fiscal 2010 to $155.9 million. Net sales in the Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction, and Commercial Stairs operating segments decreased an aggregate of $71.8 million from fiscal 2009, primarily due to the ongoing depressed construction market. The Automotive Body Panels and Steel Packaging operating segments also experienced lower volumes, resulting in reductions in net sales of $10.9 million and $11.3 million, respectively.

 

The operating loss widened by $23.5 million versus fiscal 2009 due to the lower volumes mentioned above and $35.4 million in impairment charges during fiscal 2010.charges. We recognized a $24.7 million write-off of goodwill and an $8.0 million impairment of other long-lived assets related to the previously reportedformer Construction Services operating segment, and a $2.7 million impairment of long-lived assets related to the Steel Packaging operating segment. These impairments were partially offset by lower restructuring charges related to the Transformation Plan, as the outside consulting fees associated with this effort ceased in fiscal 2009.have ceased. The responsibility for executing the Transformation Plan has since been assumed by our internal teams.

Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results:

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions) 2009  % of
Net sales
  2008  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

 $2,631.3   100.0 $3,067.2   100.0 $(435.9

Cost of goods sold

  2,456.6   93.4  2,711.5   88.4  (254.9
              

Gross margin

  174.7   6.6  355.7   11.6  (181.0

Selling, general and administrative expense

  210.0   8.0  231.6   7.6  (21.6

Impairment of long-lived assets

  97.0   3.7  -   0.0  97.0  

Restructuring and other expense

  43.0   1.6  18.1   0.6  24.9  
              

Operating income (loss)

  (175.3 -6.7  106.0   3.5  (281.3

Miscellaneous income (expense)

  (2.4 -0.1  0.7   0.0  3.1  

Gain on sale of Aegis Metal Framing LLC

  8.3   0.3  -   0.0  (8.3

Interest expense

  (20.7 -0.8  (21.5 -0.7  (0.8

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  48.6   1.8  67.5   2.2  (18.9

Income tax (expense) benefit

  37.8   1.4  (38.6 -1.3  (76.4
              

Net earnings (loss)

  (103.7 -3.9  114.1   3.7  (217.8

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (4.5 -0.2  (7.0 -0.2  (2.5
              

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 $(108.2 -4.1 $107.1   3.5 $(215.2
              

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for fiscal 2009 decreased $215.2 million from fiscal 2008, resulting in a net loss attributable to controlling interest of $108.2 million.

Net sales decreased by $435.9 million to $2,631.3 million in fiscal 2009. Decreased volumes, primarily in our Steel Processing and Metal Framing operating segments, lowered net sales by $736.6 million. Higher average selling prices in the first half of the year more than offset the dramatic drop in prices in the second half of the year, resulting in an overall increase to net sales of $300.6 million.

Gross margin decreased $181.0 million from fiscal 2008, primarily due to depressed volumes and declining spreads. Volumes declined 39% in the Steel Processing operating segment and 31% in the Metal Framing operating segment, which reduced the gross margin by $61.8 million and $40.5 million, respectively. In addition, the declining spreads resulted in aggregate inventory write-downs of $100.6 million.

SG&A expense decreased $21.6 million from fiscal 2008. Profit sharing and bonus expenses were lower by $27.0 million, but were partially offset by increased bad debt expenses of $6.9 million primarily due to automotive accounts in the Steel Processing and Automotive Body Panels operating segments.

Goodwill impairment charges of $97.0 million and pre-tax restructuring charges of $43.0 million were recognized for fiscal 2009 compared to $18.1 million in pre-tax restructuring charges in fiscal 2008. The goodwill impairment for the Metal Framing operating segment was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, as changes in key assumptions used in valuations related to the economy and construction market no longer supported the goodwill balance. The restructuring charges in both years related to the Transformation Plan, and included costs related to professional fees, job reductions and facility closures.

We recognized a pre-tax gain of $8.3 million on the sale of our interest in Aegis to our partner, MiTek Industries, Inc. in January 2009.

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates of $48.6 million was largely made up of earnings from our WAVE joint venture, which were down 13%. Our other joint ventures also experienced declines in their earnings. Aegis earnings were down year over year largely because of the sale, Worthington Specialty Processing’s loss increased by $2.6 million and inventory write-downs at our Serviacero Planos joint venture negatively impacted our results by $4.4 million. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note J – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” for further information about our participation in unconsolidated joint ventures.

Due to the pre-tax loss for fiscal 2009, an income tax benefit of $37.8 million, or 25.9% of the pre-tax loss attributable to controlling interest, was recorded. This compares to the $38.6 million tax expense, or 26.5% of the pre-tax income attributable to controlling interest, recorded in fiscal 2008. The change in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was primarily due to the change in the mix of income among the jurisdictions in which we do business, as well as the portion of the goodwill impairment that is not deductible for tax purposes.

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2009  % of
Net sales
  2008  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,183.0   100.0 $1,463.2  100.0 $(280.2

Cost of goods sold

   1,167.4   98.7  1,313.5  89.8  (146.1
               

Gross margin

   15.6   1.3  149.7  10.2  (134.1

Selling, general and administrative expense

   79.8   6.7  92.8  6.3  (13.0

Restructuring and other expense

   3.9   0.3  1.1  0.1  2.8  
               

Operating income (loss)

  $(68.1 -5.8 $55.8  3.8 $(123.9
               

Material cost

  $991.4    $1,105.7   $(114.3

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,011     3,286    (1,275

Net sales and operating income (loss) highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased by $280.2 million from fiscal 2008 to $1,183.0 million. The decrease was attributable to weakened demand in the automotive and construction markets, the two largest markets served by our Steel Processing operating segment.

Operating income decreased by $123.9 million compared to fiscal 2008, resulting in an operating loss of $68.1 million. Weakened demand, caused by the global recession, and a compressed spread between average selling prices and material costs resulted in inventory write-downs of $62.6 million and were the main drivers behind the operating loss. SG&A expense was $13.0 million lower than in fiscal 2008, primarily due to lower profit sharing and bonus expenses. Restructuring charges in both years related to the Transformation Plan.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2009  % of
Net sales
  2008  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $537.4  100.0 $578.8  100.0 $(41.4

Cost of goods sold

   429.8  80.0  457.2  79.0  (27.4
               

Gross margin

   107.6  20.0  121.6  21.0  (14.0

Selling, general and administrative expense

   45.4  8.4  51.5  8.9  (6.1

Restructuring and other expense

   1.0  0.2  0.1  0.0  0.9  
               

Operating income

  $61.2  11.4 $70.0  12.1 $(8.8
               

Material cost

  $257.5   $273.1   $(15.6

Units shipped (in thousands)

   47,639    48,058    (419

Net sales and operating income highlights were as follows:

Net sales of $537.4 million decreased by $41.4 million from fiscal 2008. An unfavorable change in the sales mix combined with lower North American volumes, reduced net sales by $38.7 million. Weaker foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted reported U.S. dollar sales of the non-U.S. operations by $9.0 million compared to fiscal 2008.

Operating income for fiscal 2009 decreased by $8.8 million from fiscal 2008. Gross margin declined to 20.0% of net sales from 21.0% as lower volumes combined with a lower spread between average selling prices and material costs to result in a $14.0 million decline in gross margin for fiscal 2009.

Metal Framing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Metal Framing operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2009  % of
Net sales
  2008  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $661.0   100.0 $788.8   100.0 $(127.8

Cost of goods sold

   638.1   96.5  729.1   92.4  (91.0
               

Gross margin

   22.9   3.5  59.7   7.6  (36.8

Selling, general and administrative expense

   54.9   8.3  67.0   8.5  (12.1

Restructuring and other expense

   110.6   16.7  9.0   1.1  101.6  
               

Operating loss

  $(142.6 -21.6 $(16.3 -2.1 $(126.3
               

Material cost

  $502.1    $557.3    $(55.2

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   459     666     (207

Net sales and operating loss highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $127.8 million from fiscal 2008 to $661.0 million. Lower volumes reduced net sales by $242.0 million, which more than offset the $114.2 million benefit from higher average selling prices realized primarily in the first half of fiscal 2009.

The operating loss of $142.6 million increased from a $16.3 million loss in fiscal 2008, and included a $97.0 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. In addition,

rapidly declining steel prices resulted in an inventory write-down of $38.0 million. Weak volumes were partially offset by lower SG&A expenses realized from plant closures and headcount reductions.

Other

The “Other” category includes the Automotive Body Panels, Steel Packaging, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs operating segments, which are immaterial for purposes of separate disclosure, along with income and expense items not allocated to the operating segments.

The following table presents a summary of operating results for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year ended May 31, 
(dollars in millions)  2009  % of
Net sales
  2008  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $249.9   100.0 $236.4   100.0 $13.5  

Cost of goods sold

   221.3   88.6  211.8   89.6  9.5  
               

Gross margin

   28.6   11.4  24.6   10.4  4.0  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   29.9   12.0  20.2   8.5  9.7  

Restructuring and other expense

   24.5   9.8  7.9   3.3  16.6  
               

Operating loss

  $(25.8 -10.3 $(3.5 -1.5 $(22.3
               

Net sales and operating loss highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $13.5 million from fiscal 2008. Net sales increased $28.6 million due to the Worthington Stairs acquisition (operating as the Commercial Stairs operating segment) in June 2008, and higher volumes in both the Mid-Rise Construction and Military Construction operating segments. This increase was partially offset by an $18.8 million decline in net sales in the Automotive Body Panels operating segment, which was negatively impacted by the downturn in the automotive market.

The operating loss widened by $22.3 million versus fiscal 2008 due to $24.5 million in restructuring charges related to the Transformation Plan, which included professional fees, employee severance and relocation expenses. In addition, SG&A expenses increased $9.7 million due to the acquisition of Worthington Stairs and higher bad debt expense in the Automotive Body Panels operating segment. Results improved significantly over fiscal 2008 in both the Military Construction and Mid-Rise Construction operating segments due to strength in those end markets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During fiscal 2010,2011, we generated $71.9 million in cash from operating activities, of $110.4received $20.6 million received $16.0 million inof proceeds from the sale of assets, invested $22.0 million in property, plant and increased cash by $7.9 million through net borrowing activity. We alsoequipment and paid $31.7 million, net of cash acquired, for the net assets of Hy-Mark and our 60% ownership interest in WNCL.

Additionally, we repurchased 7,954,698 of our common shares for $132.8 million and paid $30.2 million in dividends (excluding $4.5on our common shares, which excludes $11.0 million inof dividend payments made to noncontrolling interest), made $34.3interests. These activities were funded with $133.0 million of capital expenditures and completed acquisitions requiring $63.1 million in cash.short-term borrowings as well as the cash generated from operating activities. The following table is a summary ofsummarizes our consolidated cash flows for each period shown:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended
May 31,
   Fiscal Years Ended
May 31,
 

Cash Flow Summary (in millions)

      2010         2009     
(in millions)      2011         2010     

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $110.4   $254.3    $71.9   $110.4  

Net cash used by investing activities

   (81.9  (53.3   (39.3  (81.9

Net cash used by financing activities

   (25.8  (218.5   (35.4  (25.8
              

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   2.7    (17.5   (2.8  2.7  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   56.3    73.8     59.0    56.3  
              

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $59.0   $56.3    $56.2   $59.0  
              

We believe we have access to adequate resources to meet our needs for normal operating costs, mandatory capital expenditures, mandatory debt redemptions, dividend payments and working capital for our existing businesses. These resources include cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and unused lines of credit. We also believe that we have adequate access to the financial markets to allow us to be in a position to sell long-term debt or equity securities. However, given the current uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets, our ability to access capital and the terms under which we can do so may change.

Operating activities

Our business is cyclical and cash flows from operating activities may fluctuate during the year and from year to year due to economic conditions. We rely on cash and short-term financing to meet cyclical increases in working capital needs. Cash requirements generally rise during periods of increased economic activity or increasing raw material prices due to higher levels of inventory and accounts receivable. During economic slowdowns, or periods of decreasing raw material costs, cash requirements generally decrease as a result of the reduction of inventories and accounts receivable.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $110.4 million and $254.3$71.9 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $110.4 million in fiscal 2010. The decrease from fiscal 2010 was driven primarily by changes in working capital as well as a change in classification of proceeds from our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility as short-term borrowings effective June 1, 2010. Proceeds received prior to June 1, 2010, were recorded as a reduction in accounts receivable. As of May 31, 2011, proceeds received and outstanding were $90.0 million compared to $45.0 million and $60.0 million as of May 31, 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. A significant amount of cash was generated in fiscal 2009 by a largeThe overall decrease in net working capital. Inventories, receivables and accounts payable all decreased significantly due to lower actual and projected sales volumes, coupled with lower raw material costs. As sales and production activity levels increasedcash provided by operating activities was partially offset by higher net earnings during fiscal 2010, this prior year trend reversed and working capital requirements increased, causing a corresponding decrease in cash as those needs were met. Consolidated net working capital was $402.5 million at May 31, 2010, compared to $226.9 million at May 31, 2009. The impact from working capital changes was offset somewhat by an increase in cash generated by higher earnings.

We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure they are properly valued. Based on this review, we believe our reserve for doubtful accounts is sized appropriately. The reserve for doubtful accounts decreased approximately $6.7 million during fiscal 2010. This reduction was the result of the write-off of previously reserved accounts, as well as reduced risk related to large automotive customers, some of which have emerged from bankruptcy and others whose balances were otherwise settled. However, if the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required.

As noted above, while an economic slowdown adversely affects sales, it generally decreases working capital needs. We will continue to adjust operating activities and cash levels based on economic conditions and their impact on our markets and businesses.2011.

Investing activities

Net cash used by investing activities was $81.9$39.3 million and $53.3$81.9 million in fiscal 20102011 and fiscal 2009,2010, respectively. This changedecrease of $28.6$42.6 million was caused by several factors, as explained below.

Capital expenditures by reportable business segment representreflect cash used for investment in property, plant and equipment and are presented below. (The below by reportable business segment (this information does not includeexcludes cash flows fromrelated to acquisition orand divestiture activity):

 

  Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
  Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
 
(in millions)      2010          2009          2011           2010     

Steel Processing

  $5.9  $25.0  $6.1    $5.9  

Pressure Cylinders

   19.4   26.6   10.0     19.4  

Metal Framing

   2.6   4.5   1.1     2.6  

Other

   6.4   8.1   4.8     6.4  
        

 

   

 

 
  $34.3  $64.2  $22.0    $34.3  
        

 

   

 

 

Capital expenditures in the Steel Processing operating segment decreased $19.1 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, due primarily to the completion of the capacity expansion at our Delta, Ohio, steel galvanizing plant. This activity was largely completed in fiscal 2009.

Capital expenditures in the Pressure Cylinders operating segment decreased $7.2$9.4 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009,2011 due primarily to expenditures for an upgrade of the capabilities at our Austrian Pressure Cylinders facility. Thepressure cylinders facility located in Austria. Significant expenditures on this project were significantly higher in fiscal 2009 thanincurred in fiscal 2010, when the project was completed.

InWe also used less cash for acquisitions in fiscal 2009, we received distributions from an unconsolidated joint venture that were $23.5 million in excess of2011, as the Company’s cumulative equity in the earnings of that joint venture. This $23.5 million cash inflow was included in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows due to the nature of the distribution as a return of investment, rather than a return on investment. Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures that did not exceed the Company’s cumulative equity in the earnings of respective joint ventures are included as operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In fiscal 2010, there were only $0.4 million in distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures classified as investing cash flows.

In fiscal 2010, we also had greater acquisition outlays and lower proceeds from the sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, partially offset by a decrease in capital spending. The aggregate price paid in fiscal 2010 for the acquisitions of the Gibraltar Assets, the assets of Piper and the membership interests of SCI in fiscal 2010 was $31.4 million more than the aggregate price paid for the acquisitions of the assets of The Sharon Companies Ltd.Hy-Mark and Laser Productsour 60% ownership interest in WNCL in fiscal 2009. Additionally,2011. Higher proceeds from the sale of assets, which increased by $4.7 million in fiscal 2010 generated less2011, also contributed to the year-over-year decrease in cash than the saleused by investing activities. The impact of assets and the sale ofthese items was partially offset by a $5.7 million increase in investments in unconsolidated affiliates due primarily to our $6.2 million contribution to our joint venture in fiscal 2009. The proceeds we received in fiscal 2010 were largely related to the sale of our Metal Framing operations in Canada, while the proceeds we received in fiscal 2009 resulted largely from the sales of our investmentsChina, WMSFMCo., in the Aegis, Canessa Worthington Slovakia and Accelerated Building Technologies joint ventures. Capital spending was $29.9 million lower infourth quarter of fiscal 2010, largely due to the completion of two major projects, as noted above, and an effort by management to reduce spending.2011.

Investment activities are largely discretionary and future investment activities could be reduced significantly or eliminated as economic conditions warrant. We assess acquisition opportunities as they arise, and such opportunities may require additional financing. There can be no assurance, however, that any such opportunities will arise, that any such acquisitions will be consummated or that any needed additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when required.

Financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities was $25.8$35.4 million and $218.5$25.8 million in fiscal 20102011 and fiscal 2009,2010, respectively. In fiscal 2009, we paid down a significant amount2011, $132.8 million of debt as working capital needs decreased.cash was used to repurchase 7,954,698 of our common shares (see “Common shares” caption below). These share repurchases were funded with short-term borrowings, which increased $133.0 million in fiscal 2011 (see“Short-term borrowings”caption below). In fiscal 2010, the net proceeds from the issuance of the $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due April 15, 2020 were used to pay down other debt and reduce amounts then outstanding under theour revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The decreased level of common share repurchase activity and lower dividend payments in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, discussed below, also decreased cash used.

Long-term debt – Our senior unsecured long-term debt is rated “investment grade” by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Baa2) and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group (BBB). We typically use the net proceeds from long-term debt for acquisitions, refinancing outstanding debt, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. As of May 31, 2010,2011, we were in compliance with our long-term debt covenants. Our long-term debt agreements do not include ratings triggers or material adverse change provisions.

On June 12, 2009, we redeemed $118.5 million of the then $138.0 million outstanding principal amount of 6.70% senior notes due December 1, 2009 (the “2009 Notes”). The consideration paid for the 2009 Notes was $1,025 per $1,000 principal amount of the 2009 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The remainder of the 2009 Notes became due and were redeemed, at face value, on December 1, 2009. The redemptions were funded by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under existing credit facilities.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due April 15, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The 2020 Notes were sold to the public at 99.890% of the principal amount thereof, to yield 6.515% to maturity. The CompanyWe used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under itsour revolving credit facility and amounts then outstanding under itsour revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The proceeds on the issuance of the 2020 Notes were reduced for debt discount ($0.2 million), payment of debt issuance costs ($1.5 million) and settlement of a hedging instrument entered into in anticipation of the issuance of the 2020 Notes ($1.4 million).

Short-term debtborrowings We maintain a $435.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which expires in May 2013, except for a $35.0 million commitment by one lender, which expires in September 2010. We were in compliance with our short-term debt covenants at May 31, 2010. Our short-term debt agreements do not include ratings triggers or material adverse change provisions. We were in compliance with our short-term debt covenants at May 31, 2011.

We maintain a $400.0 million multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which matures in May 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Facility have maturities of less than one year and given that our intention has been to repay them within a year, they have been classified as notes payableshort-term borrowings within current liabilities on theour consolidated balance sheets. However, we can also extend the term of amounts borrowed by renewing these borrowings for the term of the Credit Facility. We have the option to borrow at rates equal to an applicable margin over the LIBOR, Prime or Fed Funds rates. The applicable margin is determined by our credit rating. At May 31, 2010, there2011, $41.5 million of borrowings were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility. At May 31, 2009, borrowings under the Credit Facility and bore interest at rates based on LIBOR.LIBOR, which averaged 0.87% at May 31, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2010.

We provided $8.3$9.0 million in letters of credit for third-party beneficiaries as of May 31, 2010.2011. The letters of credit secure potential obligations to certain bond and insurance providers. These letters can be drawn at any time at the option of the beneficiaries, and while not drawn against at May 31, 2011 or May 31, 2010, these letters of credit are issued against and therefore reduce availability under the Credit Facility. Letters of credit were not issued

against the Credit Facility at May 31, 2009 and therefore did not reduce availability under the Credit Facility at that date. We had $426.7$349.5 million available to us under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2010,2011, compared to $434.0$426.7 million available to us at May 31, 2009.2010.

We also have a $100.0 million revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”). The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $100.0 million of whichundivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-sell, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. As of May 31, 2011, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $100.0 million limit and $90.0 million of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

In June 2009, amended accounting guidance was issued with respect to the accounting for and disclosure of transfers of financial assets. This amended guidance impacts new transfers of many types of financial assets, including but not limited to factoring arrangements and sales of trade receivables, mortgages and installment loans. We adopted this amended accounting guidance on June 1, 2010. Upon adoption, it was determined that asset transfers to the AR facility no longer qualified for sales treatment. Accordingly, the $90.0 million of net proceeds received and outstanding at May 31, 2011 are classified as short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets and as net proceeds from short-term borrowings in our consolidated statements of cash flows. Asset transfers prior to June 1, 2010, qualified for sales treatment and were therefore recorded as a reduction in the accounts receivable balance. As of May 31, 2010 and May 31,

2009, the $45.0 million and $60.0 million, respectively, in proceeds from the AR Facility were recorded as a reduction in the accounts receivable balance. Facility fees incurred after the adoption of the amended accounting guidance have been classified as interest expense. In contrast, facility fees incurred prior to June 1, 2010, were classified as miscellaneous expense. Facility fees of $1.1 million, $1.2 million, and $2.6 million were incurred during fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.

We also maintain a $9.5 million credit facility, through our consolidated joint venture, WNCL, that matures in November 2011. This credit facility bears interest at a variable rate, which was utilized13.5% at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See the description that follows under “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” The AR Facility is backed by a committed liquidity facility that expires during January 2011.

The adoption of certain United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) amendments effective June 1, 2010, as discussed below under “Recently Issued Accounting Standards,” will result in recognition on the consolidated balance sheets of the AR Facility. Recognition on the consolidated balance sheets will include reporting of amounts sold under the AR Facility as accounts receivable and outstanding secured borrowings. Also, prospectively upon adoption, related Facility fees will be treated as interest expense in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Common shares – We declared quarterly dividends of $0.10 per common share for each quarter of fiscal 2010. The dividend declared during the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 was $0.17 per common share, and this was reduced to $0.10 per common share during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2009.2011. We paid dividends on our common shares of $31.7$30.2 million and $53.7$31.7 million in fiscal 20102011 and fiscal 2009,2010, respectively. On June 29, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. This dividend is payable on September 29, 2011, to shareholders of record as of September 15, 2011.

On September 26, 2007, Worthington Industries, Inc. announced that the Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries, Inc.’sour outstanding common shares. A totalshares, of 8,449,500which 494,802 common shares remained available for repurchase at May 31, 2011. During fiscal 2011, we paid $132.8 million to repurchase 7,954,698 of our common shares. No common share repurchases were made under this authorization during fiscal 2010.

On June 29, 2011, the Board authorized the repurchase authorization as of May 31, 2010. up to an additional 10,000,000 of our outstanding common shares, increasing the total number of common shares available for repurchase to 10,494,802.

The common shares available for repurchase under this authorizationthese authorizations may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other relevant considerations. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. No common share repurchases were made under this authorization during fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2009, we spent $12.4 million on common share repurchases. The Company has begun to repurchase common shares under this authorization during the first quarter of the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note U – Subsequent Events” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding common share repurchase activity subsequent to May 31, 2010.

Dividend Policy

We currently have no material contractual or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends. Dividends are declared at the discretion of theour Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.Directors. The Board reviews the dividend quarterly and establishes the dividend rate based upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, current and projected cash flows, business prospects and other relevant factors. While we have paid a dividend every quarter since becoming a public company in 1968, there is no guarantee this will continue in the future.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of May 31, 2010.2011. Certain of these contractual obligations are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet, while others are disclosed as future obligations underin accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

  Payments Due by Period  Payments Due by Period 
(in millions)  Total  Less Than
1 Year
  1 - 3
Years
  4 - 5
Years
  After
5  Years
  Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
 

Short-term borrowings

  $133.0    $133.0    $-    $-    $-  

Long-term debt

  $250.4  $-  $0.1  $100.2  $150.1   250.3     -     0.2     100.2     149.9  

Interest expense on long-term debt

   124.3   15.1   30.2   30.2   48.8   109.2     15.1     30.2     24.9     39.0  

Operating leases

   39.7   10.7   16.1   7.9   5.0   32.4     7.8     11.3     5.1     8.2  

Unconditional purchase obligations

   21.3   2.4   4.7   4.7   9.5   18.9     2.4     4.7     4.7     7.1  
                                   

Total contractual cash obligations

  $435.7  $28.2  $51.1  $143.0  $213.4  $543.8    $158.3    $46.4    $134.9    $204.2  
                                   

The interest

Interest expense on long-term debt is computed by using the fixed rates of interest on the debt, including impacts of the related interest rate hedge. The unconditionalUnconditional purchase obligations are to secure access to a facility used to regenerate acid used in our Steel Processing facilitiesoperating segment through the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with our unrecognized tax benefits of $5.9$5.4 million, we are unable to make a reliable estimate of the periods of cash settlement with the respective tax authorities and have not included suchthis amount in the contractual obligations table above.

The following table summarizes our other commercial commitments as of May 31, 2010.2011. These commercial commitments are not reflected onin our consolidated balance sheets.sheet.

 

  Commitment Expiration by Period  Commitment Expiration by Period 
(in millions)  Total  Less Than
1 Year
  1 - 3
Years
  4 - 5
Years
  After
5  Years
  Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
 

Guarantee (aircraft residual value)

  $14.7  $14.7  $    -  $    -  $    -

Guarantees

  $20.9    $15.9    $    -    $5.0    $    -  

Standby letters of credit

   8.3   8.3   -   -   -   9.0     9.0     -     -     -  
                                   

Total commercial commitments

  $23.0  $23.0  $-  $-  $-  $29.9    $24.9    $-    $5.0    $-  
                                   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We maintain a $100.0 million revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility, which expires in January 2011. The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. Transactions under the AR Facility have been accounted for as sales. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $100.0 million of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-sell, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, receivables from certain foreign customers, concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value. Accounts receivable sold under the AR Facility are excluded from accounts receivable in the consolidated financial statements. As of May 31, 2010, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $100.0 million limit, and $45.0 million of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

The adoption of certain U.S. GAAP amendments effective June 1, 2010, as discussed below under “Recently Issued Accounting Standards,” will result in recognition on the consolidated balance sheets of the AR Facility. Recognition on the consolidated balance sheets will include reporting of amounts sold under the AR Facility as accounts receivable and outstanding secured borrowings. Also, prospectively upon adoption, related Facility fees will be treated as interest expense in the consolidated statements of earnings.

We do not have guarantees or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of May 31, 2010, the Company was2011, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which the Company haswe have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately $14.7$15.9 million at May 31, 2010.2011. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a $5.0 million term loan held by ArtiFlex, an unconsolidated joint venture. Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company haswe have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to this guarantee,these guarantees, and determined that the fair value of theour obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2009,2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendmentpresentation of comprehensive income in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This new guidance requires entities to present reclassification adjustments included in other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements and allows entities to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. It also eliminates the option for entities to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. For public companies, this accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets. This amendment removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale. This amendment also requires additional disclosures about any transfers of financial assets and a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. This amendmentguidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and(and interim periods within those fiscal years.years) beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Retrospective application to prior periods is required. The adoption of this amendment effective June 1, 2010 will result in recognition on the consolidated balance sheets of our trade accounts receivable securitization facility (see the description above, under “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” for details regarding the AR facility).

In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for variable interest entities. This amendment changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the purpose and design of the other entity and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact its economic performance. The amendment also requires additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. This amendment isnew guidance, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Worthington will adopt this amendmentus on June 1, 2010; and, while we continue to fully evaluate the anticipated impacts, that adoption2012, is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position or results of operations.

In May 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that resulted in common fair value measurements and disclosures under both U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This amended guidance is explanatory in nature and does not require additional fair value measurements nor is it intended to result in significant changes in the application of current guidance. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance, effective for us on March 1, 2012, to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2009, amended accounting guidance was issued for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This amended guidance sets forth requirements that must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from a sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not been delivered. Additionally, the amended guidance requires more disclosure about an entity’s multiple-element arrangements. This amended guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance on June 1, 2011, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Environmental

We do not believe environmental issues have had or will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, future results of operations or financial position.

Inflation

The effects of inflation on our operations were not significant during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to our valuation of receivables, inventories, intangible assets, accrued liabilities, income and other tax accruals and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect our significant judgments and uncertainties that could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Although actual results historically have not deviated significantly from those determined using our estimates, as discussed below, our financial position or results of operations could be materially different if we were to report under different conditions or to use different assumptions in the application of such policies. We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical to us, as these are the primary areas where financial information is subject to our estimates, assumptions and judgment in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition:    We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss provided evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable and the ability to collect is probable. In circumstances where the collection of payment is highly questionable at the time of shipment, we defer recognition of revenue until payment is collected. We provide for returns and allowances based on historical experience and current customer activities. As of May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we had deferred $9.3 million of revenue related to pricing disputes. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note G – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding this item and related litigation during fiscal 2010.

Within our Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs businesses,The business units that comprise the Global Group operating segment, which representedhave contributed less than 5.0% of consolidated net sales for each of the last three fiscal years, recognize revenue is recognized on a percentage-of-completion method.

Receivables:    In order to ensure that our receivables are properly valued, we utilize two contra-receivable accounts: returns and allowances and allowance for doubtful accounts. Returns and allowances are used to record estimates of returns or other allowances resulting from quality, delivery, discounts or other issues affecting the value of receivables. This account is estimated based on historical trends and current market conditions, with the offset to net sales.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is used to record the estimated risk of loss related to the customers’ inability to pay. This allowance is maintained at a level that we consider appropriate based on factors that affect collectability, such as the financial health of the customer,our customers, historical trends of charge-offs and recoveries and current economic and market conditions. As we monitor our receivables, we identify customers that may have payment problems, and we adjust the allowance accordingly, with the offset to selling, general and administrative expense. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when recovery is considered remote.

We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are properly valued and collectible. Based on this review, we believe our related reserves are sized appropriately. The reserve for doubtful accounts has decreased approximately $6.7$1.6 million during fiscal 2010.2011 to $4.2 million. This reduction was primarily the result of the write-off of previously reserved accounts as well as reduced risk relatedand, to large automotive customers, somea lesser extent, the contribution of which have emerged from bankruptcy and others whose balances were otherwise settled.our metal framing business to the ClarkDietrich joint venture.

While we believe our allowances are adequate, changes in economic conditions, the financial health of customers and bankruptcy settlements could impact our future earnings. If the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction end markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required.

Inventory Valuation:    Our inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using a first-in, first-out method. To ensure that inventory is not stated above the current market valueThis assessment requires the significant use of significant estimates to determine the replacement cost, cost to complete, normal profit margin and ultimate selling price of the inventory. We believe that our inventories arewere valued appropriately as of May 31, 20102011, and May 31, 2009.2010.

Impairment of Definite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or aasset group of assets may not be recoverable. WhenImpairment testing involves a potentialcomparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is indicated, accounting standards require a chargeperformed to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings. An impairment loss is recognized to the consolidated financial statements if the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets exceeds the fair value ofextent that asset or group of assets. The loss recognized would be the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value.

Fiscal 2011: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment that were not contributed to the ArtiFlex joint venture, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $6.4 million. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation, as more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

DueDuring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to continued deteriorationchanges in the intended use of certain long-lived within our Metal Framing operating segment that were not contributed to the ClarkDietrich joint venture, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified assets was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s estimate of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent

comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $18.3 million. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation and related restructuring charges, as more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Commercial Stairs business unit, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $2.5 million, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and market conditions impactingSupplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment, duringwe determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the secondidentified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.9 million, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2010,2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Metal Framing and Steel Packaging operating segments, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, those long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009.present. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Steel Packaging asset group was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment loss was recognized in the amount of $2.7 million. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at November 30, 2009.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing operating segment and the then Construction Services operating segment during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarters ended August 31, 2009 and November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. Other than as described at “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note M – Restructuring,” the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment lossescharges were indicated.recognized.

Due to continued deterioration in businessDuring the second and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing operating segment and the then Construction Services operating segment during the third quarterquarters of fiscal 2010,2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets of our consolidated joint venture, Spartan, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010.present. Recoverability of the identified asset groupsgroup was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Metal Framing asset group was more than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, there wasvalue; therefore, no impairment loss at February 28, 2010 in the Metal Framing operating segment, other than that described at “Item 8. – Financial Statements and

Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note R – Fair Value” and “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note M – Restructuring” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to an identified asset group within the previously reported Construction Services operating segment was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment loss was recognized during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010 in the amount of $8.1 million. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at February 28, 2010. The impaired assets consisted largely of customer lists and also included trade name and technology assets.charges were recognized.

Fiscal 2010:Due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Processing operating segment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of impairment were present. Therefore, long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment losscharges were recognized.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing and then Construction Services operating segments during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that

indicators of potential impairment were present for long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was indicatedtested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the identified metal framing assets was more than the related net book value of the asset group. Therefore, no impairment charges were recognized with regard to these long-lived assets.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to an identified asset group within the then Construction Services operating segment was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge of $8.1 million was recognized during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. This impairment charge was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at May 31, 2010, other than that described atFebruary 28, 2010. The impaired assets consisted largely of customer lists and also included trade name and technology assets. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note RP – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing and then Construction Services operating segments during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, the identified assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarters ended August 31, 2009 and November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the corresponding net book value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting the Steel Packaging operating segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, those long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Steel Packaging asset group was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge of $2.7 million was recognized. This impairment charge was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at November 30, 2009. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note MPRestructuring”Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.fair value for these assets.

We test ourImpairment of Indefinite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    Purchased goodwill balancesand intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, andor more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwillimpairment may be impaired.present. Application of goodwill impairment testing involves judgment, including but not limited to, the identification of reporting units and estimating the fair value of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that the characteristics of the componentsreporting units within each operating segment are similar and allow for their aggregation toin accordance with the operating segment level for testing purposes. applicable accounting guidance.

The goodwill impairment test consists of determiningcomparing the fair value of theeach operating segments,segment, determined using discounted cash flows, and comparing the result to theeach operating segment’s respective carrying values of the operating segments.value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying

amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value, ana goodwill impairment of the goodwill is indicated. The amount of the impairment would beis determined by establishingcomparing the fair value of allthe net assets and liabilities of the operating segment, excluding goodwill, to its estimated fair value, with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill and comparingis lower than its carrying value, the total todifference is recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated statements of earnings.

Fiscal 2011: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed our annual impairment evaluation of goodwill. The estimated fair value of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, the operating segment. The difference would represent the faironly reporting unit with goodwill throughout fiscal 2011, exceeded its carrying value of the goodwill;by a substantial amount and, if it is lower than the book value of the goodwill, the difference would be recorded as a losstherefore, no impairment charges were recognized. However, future declines in the consolidated statementsmarket and deterioration in earnings could lead to impairment of earnings.goodwill and other long-lived assets in subsequent periods.

Fiscal 2010:Due to industry changes, weakness in the construction market and the depressed results in the Metal Framingthen Construction Services operating segment, overwe determined that indicators of impairment were present and, therefore, tested the fiscal 2009 year, we testedgoodwill of this operating segment for impairment on a quarterly basis duringthroughout fiscal 2009. During the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008, we again tested the value of the goodwill balances in the Metal Framing operating segment.2010. Given the significant decline in, the economy during fiscal 2009 and its impact oncontinued uncertainty of, the construction market throughout the first half of fiscal 2010, during the third quarter, we revised the forecasted cash flows and discount rate assumptions used in our previous valuations of this operating segment. The forecasted cash flows were revised downward due to the significant decline in, and the future uncertainty of, the economy. The discount rate, based on our then current cost of debt and equity capital, was changed due to the increased risk in our forecast. After reviewing the revised valuation and the fair value estimates of the remaining assets, it was determined that the value of the business no longer supported its $96.9 million goodwill balance. As a result, the full amount was written-off in the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008.

The results of the previously reported Construction Services operating segment continued to deteriorate as the anticipated economic recovery in the commercial construction industry was pushed further into the future. As a result, management determined that impairment indicators existed and the assets (long-lived assets as well as goodwill) of the then Construction Services operating segment were reviewed for potential

impairment on a quarterly basis during fiscal 2010. These tests were performed in earlier periods with no impairment resulting. However, each successive test yielded a result closer to the point at which an impairment would be indicated. During the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010, we again tested the value of the goodwill balances in the then Construction Services operating segment. Based upon the continued depression of the industry and the future uncertainty of the market, we revised the forecasted cash flows used in our previous valuations of this operating segment downward.impairment evaluation. After reviewing the revised valuation and the fair value estimates of the remaining net assets, it was determined that the value of the business no longer supported its goodwill balance of $24.7 million goodwill balance.million. As a result, the full amount was written-off induring the third fiscal quarter ended February 28,of fiscal 2010. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings. Management continues to assess these businesses, as well as market and industry factors impacting the businesses, in order to determine the appropriate course of action going forward.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, at which point onlywe completed our annual impairment evaluation of the remaining goodwill balance, consisting solely of goodwill within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment had remaining non-impaired goodwill recorded, the Company completed its annual test of goodwill. No additional impairments were identified during the Company’s annual assessment of goodwill, as thesegment. The estimated fair value of theour Pressure Cylinders operating segment exceeded its carrying value by a substantial amount. However, future declines in the marketamount and, deterioration in earnings could lead to additionaltherefore, no impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets.charges were recognized.

Accounting for Derivatives and Other Contracts at Fair Value:We use derivatives in the normal course of business to manage our exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign currency and interest rates. Fair values for these contracts are based upon valuation methodologies deemed appropriate in the circumstances; however, the use of different assumptions could affect the estimated fair values.

Stock-Based Compensation:    All share-based awards to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recorded as expense in the consolidated statements of earnings based on their fair values.

Income Taxes:    In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance, we account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of our assets and liabilities. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some, or a portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

In accordance with accounting literature related to uncertainty in income taxes, tax benefits from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the financial statements are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

We have reserves for taxes and associated interest and penalties that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by taxing authorities. It is our policy to record these in income tax expense. While we believe the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are appropriate, we have established the tax and interest reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge our positions. The tax reserves

are analyzed periodically, and adjustments are made as events occur to warrant adjustment to the reserves, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues, and release of administrative guidance or court decisions affecting a particular tax issue.

Self-Insurance Reserves:We are largely self-insured with respect to workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability, property damage, employee medical claims and other potential losses. In order to reduce risk and better manage our overall loss exposure, we purchase stop-loss insurance that covers individual

claims in excess of the deductible amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to settle open claims, which includes estimates of legal costs expected to be incurred, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on actuarial valuations that take into consideration the historical average claim volume, the average cost for settled claims, current trends in claim costs, changes in our business and workforce, general economic factors and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimated reserves for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from assumptions used and historical trends. Facility consolidations, a focus on safety initiatives and an emphasis on property loss prevention and product quality have resulted in an improvement in our loss history and the related assumptions used to analyze many of the current self-insurance reserves. We will continue to review these reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if factors dictate a more frequent review is warranted.

The critical accounting policies discussed herein are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP, with a lesser need for our judgment in their application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Item 7A. — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to various market risks. We continually monitor these risks and regularly develop appropriate strategies to manage them. Accordingly, from time to time, we may enter into certain financial and commodity-based derivative instruments. These instruments are used solely to mitigate market exposure and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note O – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information.

Interest Rate Risk

We entered into an interest rate swap in October 2004, which was amended December 17, 2004. The swap has a notional amount of $100.0 million to hedge changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the LIBOR rate associated with the December 17, 2004, issuance of the unsecured Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 17, 2014. See “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note CG – Debt and Receivables Securitization” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The critical terms of the derivative correspond with the critical terms of the underlying exposure. The interest rate swap was executed with a highly rated financial institution. No credit loss is anticipated. We pay a fixed rate of 4.46% and receive a variable rate based on the six-month LIBOR. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the interest rate yield curve associated with our interest rate swap indicates that a 10% parallel decline in the yield curve would not materially impact the fair value of our interest rate swap. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the interest rates on our variable rate debt indicates that a 10% increase in those rates would not have materially impacted our netreported results. Based on the terms of the noted derivative contract, such changes would also be expected to materially offset against each other.

We entered into a U.S. Treasury Rate-based treasury lock in April 2010, in anticipation of the issuance of $150.0 million principal amount of our 2020 Notes. SeeRefer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note CG – Debt and Receivables

Securitization” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for additional information regarding the 2020 Notes. The treasury lock had a notional amount of $150.0 million to hedge the risk of changes in the semi-annual interest payments attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate during the several days leading up to the issuance of the 10-year fixed-rate debt. Upon pricing of the 2020 Notes, the derivative was settled and resulted in a loss to the Company of approximately $1.4 million, which has been reflected within other comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of equity. That balance will be recognized in earnings, as an increase to interest expense, over the life of the related 2020 Notes.

Foreign Currency Risk

The translation of foreign currencies into United States dollars subjects us to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates. Derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk; however, we do make use of forward contracts to manage exposure to certain intercompany loans with our foreign affiliates. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. At May 31, 2010,2011, the difference between the contract and book value of these instruments was not material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A 10% change in the exchange rate to the U.S. dollar forward rate is not expected to materially impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the U.S. dollar on these foreign currency-denominated contracts indicates that if the U.S. dollar uniformly weakened by 10% against all of these currency exposures, the fair value of these instruments would not be materially impacted. Any resulting changes in fair value would be offset by changes in the underlying hedged balance sheet position. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign locations indicates that a 10% increase in those rates would not have materially impacted our net results. The sensitivity analysis assumes a uniform shift in all foreign currency exchange rates. The assumption that exchange rates change in uniformity may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market risk for price fluctuations on purchases of steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials andas well as our utility requirements. We attempt to negotiate the best prices for commodities and to competitively price products and services to reflect the fluctuations in market prices. Derivative financial instruments have been used to manage a portion of our exposure to fluctuations in the cost of steel, zinc, nickel and natural gas. These contracts covered periods commensurate with known or expected exposures throughthroughout the fiscal year endingended May 31, 2011. The derivative instruments were executed with highly rated financial institutions. No credit loss is anticipated. No derivatives are held for trading purposes.

A sensitivity analysis of changes in the price of hedged commodities indicates that a 10% decline in the market prices of steel, zinc, gas or any combination of these would not have a material impact to the value of our hedges or our netreported results.

FairThe fair values for theof our outstanding derivative positions as of May 31, 20102011 and 20092010 are summarized below. Fair values of thethese derivatives do not consider the offsetting impact of the underlying hedged item.

 

  Fair Value At
May 31,
   Change
In Fair
Value
   Fair Value At May 31, 
(in millions)      2010           2009             2011           2010     

Interest rate

  $(10.6  $(7.9  $(2.7  $(12.4  $(10.6

Foreign currency

   (0.2   0.4     (0.6   (0.6   (0.2

Commodity

   0.4     -     0.4     1.1     0.4  
                    
  $(10.4  $(7.5  $(2.9  $(11.9  $(10.4
                    

Safe Harbor

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk include forward-looking statements with respect to management’s opinion about risks associated with the use of derivative instruments. These statements are based on certain assumptions with respect to market prices and industry supply of, and demand for, steel products and certain raw materials. To the extent these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, future outcomes with respect to hedging programs may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.

Item 8. — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Worthington Industries, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2010.2011. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2010,2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Worthington Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010,2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 30, 2010August 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/    KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

July 30, 2010August 1, 2011

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  May 31,  May 31, 
  2010  2009  2011   2010 

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $59,016  $56,319  $56,167    $59,016  

Receivables, less allowances of $5,752 and $12,470 at May 31, 2010 and 2009

   301,455   182,881

Receivables, less allowances of $4,150 and $5,752 at May 31, 2011 and 2010

   388,550     301,455  

Inventories:

        

Raw materials

   177,819   141,082   189,450     177,819  

Work in process

   106,261   57,612   98,940     106,261  

Finished products

   80,251   71,878   82,440     80,251  
              

Total inventories

   364,331   270,572   370,830     364,331  
              

Income taxes receivable

   1,443   29,749   1,356     1,443  

Assets held for sale

   2,637   707   9,681     2,637  

Deferred income taxes

   21,964   24,868   28,297     21,964  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   31,439   33,839   36,754     31,439  
              

Total current assets

   782,285   598,935   891,635     782,285  
              

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

   113,001   100,395   232,149     113,001  

Goodwill

   79,543   101,343   93,633     79,543  

Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $17,768 and $15,328 at May 31, 2010 and 2009

   23,964   23,642

Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $12,688 and $17,768 at May 31, 2011 and 2010

   19,958     23,964  

Other assets

   15,391   18,009   24,540     15,391  

Property, plant and equipment:

        

Land

   31,660   30,960   26,960     31,660  

Buildings and improvements

   242,990   242,558   182,030     242,990  

Machinery and equipment

   898,439   879,871   751,865     898,439  

Construction in progress

   13,725   22,783   7,878     13,725  
              

Total property, plant and equipment

   1,186,814   1,176,172   968,733     1,186,814  

Less accumulated depreciation

   680,651   654,667   563,399     680,651  
              

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   506,163   521,505   405,334     506,163  
              

Total assets

  $1,520,347  $1,363,829  $1,667,249    $1,520,347  
              

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  May 31,  May 31, 
  2010 2009  2011   2010 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

       

Current liabilities:

       

Accounts payable

  $258,730   $136,215  $253,404    $258,730  

Notes payable

   -    980

Short-term borrowings

   132,956     -  

Accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes

   62,413    34,503   72,312     62,413  

Dividends payable

   7,932    7,916   7,175     7,932  

Other accrued items

   41,635    49,488   52,023     41,635  

Income taxes payable

   9,092    4,965   7,132     9,092  

Current maturities of long-term debt

   -    138,013
              

Total current liabilities

   379,802    372,080   525,002     379,802  

Other liabilities

   68,380    65,400   67,309     68,380  

Long-term debt

   250,238    100,400   250,254     250,238  

Deferred income taxes

   71,893    82,986   83,981     71,893  
              

Total liabilities

   770,313    620,866   926,546     770,313  
              

Shareholders’ equity – controlling interest:

       

Preferred shares, without par value; authorized – 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – none

   -    -   -     -  

Common shares, without par value; authorized – 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2010 – 79,217,421 shares, 2009 – 78,997,617 shares

   -    -

Common shares, without par value; authorized – 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2011 – 71,683,876 shares, 2010 – 79,217,421 shares

   -     -  

Additional paid-in capital

   189,918    183,051   181,525     189,918  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $5,653 and $3,251 at May 31, 2010 and 2009

   (10,631  4,457

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $5,456 and $5,653 at May 31, 2011 and 2010

   3,975     (10,631

Retained earnings

   532,126    518,561   504,410     532,126  
              

Total shareholders’ equity – controlling interest

   711,413    706,069   689,910     711,413  

Noncontrolling interest

   38,621    36,894   50,793     38,621  
              

Total equity

   750,034    742,963   740,703     750,034  
              

Total liabilities and equity

  $1,520,347   $1,363,829  $1,667,249    $1,520,347  
              

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share)share amounts)

 

  Fiscal Years Ended May 31,   Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 
  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Net sales

  $1,943,034   $2,631,267   $3,067,161    $2,442,624   $1,943,034   $2,631,267  

Cost of goods sold

   1,663,104    2,456,533    2,711,414     2,086,467    1,663,104    2,456,533  
                    

Gross margin

   279,930    174,734    355,747     356,157    279,930    174,734  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   218,315    210,046    231,602     235,198    218,315    210,046  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   35,409    96,943    -     4,386    35,409    96,943  

Restructuring and other expense

   4,243    43,041    18,111     2,653    4,243    43,041  

Joint venture transactions

   (10,436  -    -  
                    

Operating income (loss)

   21,963    (175,296  106,034     124,356    21,963    (175,296

Other income (expense):

        

Miscellaneous income (expense)

   1,127    (2,329  620     597    1,127    (2,329

Gain on sale of investment in Aegis

   -    8,331    -     -    -    8,331  

Interest expense

   (9,534  (20,734  (21,452   (18,756  (9,534  (20,734

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

   64,601    48,589    67,459     76,333    64,601    48,589  
                    

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

   78,157    (141,439  152,661     182,530    78,157    (141,439

Income tax expense (benefit)

   26,650    (37,754  38,616     58,496    26,650    (37,754
                    

Net earnings (loss)

   51,507    (103,685  114,045     124,034    51,507    (103,685

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

   6,266    4,529    6,968     8,968    6,266    4,529  
                    

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

  $45,241   $(108,214 $107,077    $115,066   $45,241   $(108,214
                    

Basic

        

Average common shares outstanding

   79,127    78,903    81,232     74,803    79,127    78,903  
                    

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

  $0.57   $(1.37 $1.32    $1.54   $0.57   $(1.37
                    

Diluted

        

Average common shares outstanding

   79,143    78,903    81,898     75,409    79,143    78,903  
                    

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

  $0.57   $(1.37 $1.31    $1.53   $0.57   $(1.37
                    

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)share amounts)

 

 Controlling Interest      Controlling Interest Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total 
 Common Shares Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total  Common Shares Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  
 Shares Amount 

Balance at June 1, 2007

 84,908,476   $    - $166,908    23,181   $745,912   $936,001   $49,321   $985,322  

Comprehensive income (loss):

        

Net earnings

 -    -  -    -    107,077    107,077    6,968    114,045  

Foreign currency translation

 -    -  -    13,080    -    13,080    1,773    14,853  

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $(44)

 -    -  -    590    -    590    -    590  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $6,290

 -    -  -    (12,218  -    (12,218  (3,995  (16,213
              

Total comprehensive income

       108,529    4,746    113,275  
              

Common shares issued

 851,080    -  15,318    -    -    15,318    -    15,318  

Stock-based compensation

 -    -  4,010    -    -    4,010    -    4,010  

Gain from TWB Company, L.L.C. dilution

 -    -  1,944    -    -    1,944    -    1,944  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

 (6,451,500  -  (13,280  -    (112,505  (125,785  -    (125,785

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

 -    -  -    -    -    -    (11,904  (11,904

Cash dividends declared ($0.68 per share)

 -    -  -    -    (54,640  (54,640  -    (54,640
                        Shares Amount Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  Noncontrolling
Interest
 Total 

Balance at May 31, 2008

 79,308,056    -  174,900    24,633    685,844    885,377    42,163    927,540    79,308,056   $    -   $

Comprehensive loss:

               

Net earnings (loss)

 -    -  -    -    (108,214  (108,214  4,529    (103,685  -    -    -    -    (108,214  (108,214  4,529    (103,685

Foreign currency translation

 -    -  -    (9,866  -    (9,866  (1,874  (11,740  -    -    -    (9,866  -    (9,866  (1,874  (11,740

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $14

 -    -  -    (4,766  -    (4,766  -    (4,766  -    -    -    (4,766  -    (4,766  -    (4,766

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $3,187

 -    -  -    (5,544  -    (5,544  (772  (6,316  -    -    -    (5,544  -    (5,544  (772  (6,316
                            

Total comprehensive income (loss)

       (128,390  1,883    (126,507       (128,390  1,883    (126,507
                            

Common shares issued

 339,561    -  3,875    -    -    3,875    -    3,875    339,561    -    3,875    -    -    3,875    -    3,875  

Stock-based compensation

 -    -  5,767    -    -    5,767    -    5,767    -    -    5,767    -    -    5,767    -    5,767  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

 (650,000  -  (1,448  -    (10,954  (12,402  -    (12,402  (650,000  -    (1,448  -    (10,954  (12,402  -    (12,402

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

 -    -  -    -    -    -    (7,152  (7,152  -    -    -    -    -    -    (7,152  (7,152

Cash dividends declared ($0.61 per share)

 -    -   -    (48,115  (48,115  -    (48,115  -    -     -    (48,115  (48,115  -    (48,115

Other

 -    -  (43  -    -    (43  -    (43  -    -    (43  -    -    (43  -    (43
                                               

Balance at May 31, 2009

 78,997,617    -  183,051    4,457    518,561    706,069    36,894    742,963    78,997,617    -    183,051    4,457    518,561    706,069    36,894    742,963  

Comprehensive income (loss):

                

Net earnings

 -    -  -    -    45,241    45,241    6,266    51,507    -    -    -    -    45,241    45,241    6,266    51,507  

Unrealized gain on investment

 -    -  -    5    -    5    -    5    -    -    -    5    -    5    -    5  

Foreign currency translation

 -    -  -    (13,739  -    (13,739  -    (13,739  -    -    -    (13,739  -    (13,739  -    (13,739

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,163

 -    -  -    317    -    317    -    317    -    -    -    317    -    317    -    317  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $854

 -    -  -    (1,671  -    (1,671  -    (1,671  -    -    -    (1,671  -    (1,671  -    (1,671
                            

Total comprehensive income

       30,153    6,266    36,419         30,153    6,266    36,419  
                            

Common shares issued

 219,804    -  2,291    -    -    2,291    -    2,291    219,804    -    2,291    -    -    2,291    -    2,291  

Stock-based compensation

 -    -  4,576    -    -    4,576    -    4,576    -    -    4,576    -    -    4,576    -    4,576  

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

 -    -  -    -    -    -    (4,539  (4,539  -    -    -    -    -    -    (4,539  (4,539

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

 -    -  -    -    (31,676  (31,676  -    (31,676  -    -    -    -    (31,676  (31,676  -    (31,676
                                               

Balance at May 31, 2010

 79,217,421   $- $189,918   $(10,631 $532,126   $711,413   $38,621   $750,034    79,217,421    -    189,918    (10,631  532,126    711,413    38,621    750,034  

Comprehensive income:

        

Net earnings

  -    -    -    -    115,066    115,066    8,968    124,034  

Foreign currency translation

  -    -    -    13,006    -    13,006    40    13,046  

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $(760)

  -    -    -    1,442    -    1,442    -    1,442  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $563

  -    -    -    158    -    158    -    158  
                                     

Total comprehensive income

       129,672    9,008    138,680  
              

Acquisition of Nitin Cylinders Limited

  -    -    -    -    -    -    14,156    14,156  

Common shares issued

  421,153    -    4,827    -    -    4,827    -    4,827  

Stock-based compensation

  -    -    6,173    -    -    6,173    -    6,173  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

  (7,954,698   (19,393   (113,371  (132,764  -    (132,764

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (10,992  (10,992

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

  -    -    -    -    (29,411  (29,411  -    (29,411
                        

Balance at May 31, 2011

  71,683,876   $-   $181,525   $3,975   $504,410   $689,910   $50,793   $740,703  
                        

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  Fiscal Years Ended May 31,   Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 
  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Operating activities:

        

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

  $45,241   $(108,214 $107,077  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Net earnings (loss)

  $124,034   $51,507   $(103,685

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   64,653    64,073    63,413     61,058    64,653    64,073  

Impairment of long-lived assets

   35,409    96,943    -     4,386    35,409    96,943  

Restructuring and other expense, non-cash

   3,408    8,925    5,169     203    3,408    8,925  

Joint venture transactions, non-cash

   (21,652  -    -  

Provision for deferred income taxes

   (6,110  (25,479  (3,228   7,482    (6,110  (25,479

Bad debt expense

   (900  8,307    1,398  

Bad debt expense (income)

   1,236    (900  8,307  

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions

   (12,007  8,491    (8,539   (19,188  (12,007  8,491  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

   6,266    4,529    6,969  

Net (gain) loss on sale of assets

   (3,908  1,317    3,756     652    (3,908  1,317  

Stock-based compensation

   4,570    5,767    4,173     6,173    4,570    5,767  

Excess tax benefits – stock-based compensation

   (165  (433  (2,035   (674  (165  (433

Gain on acquisitions and sales of subsidiary investments

   (891  (8,331  -     -    (891  (8,331

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Receivables

   (114,892  226,690    5,569     (96,056  (114,892  226,690  

Inventories

   (64,499  329,892    (144,474   (24,261  (64,499  329,892  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   30,425    (20,805  8,252     (10,465  30,425    (20,805

Other assets

   205    (643  (1,546   922    205    (643

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   125,613    (321,798  138,822     31,098    125,613    (321,798

Other liabilities

   (1,999  (14,905  (4,255   6,947    (1,999  (14,905
                    

Net cash provided by operating activities

   110,419    254,326    180,521     71,895    110,419    254,326  
                    

Investing activities:

        

Investment in property, plant and equipment, net

   (34,319  (64,154  (47,520   (22,025  (34,319  (64,154

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

   (63,098  (42,199  (2,225   (31,705  (63,098  (42,199

Distributions from (investments in) unconsolidated affiliates, net

   (483  20,362    (47,598   (6,161  (483  20,362  

Proceeds from sale of assets

   15,950    6,883    1,025     20,614    15,950    6,883  

Proceeds from sale of investments in unconsolidated affiliates

   -    25,863    -     -    -    25,863  

Sales of short-term investments

   -    -    25,562  
                    

Net cash used by investing activities

   (81,950  (53,245  (70,756   (39,277  (81,950  (53,245
                    

Financing activities:

        

Net proceeds from (payments on) short-term borrowings

   (980  (142,385  103,800  

Net proceeds from (payments of) short-term borrowings

   132,956    (980  (142,385

Proceeds from long-term debt, net

   146,942    -    -     -    146,942    -  

Principal payments on long-term debt

   (138,013  (7,241  -     -    (138,013  (7,241

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

   2,313    3,899    13,171     4,827    2,313    3,899  

Excess tax benefits – stock-based compensation

   165    433    2,035     674    165    433  

Payments to minority interest

   (4,539  (7,152  (11,904   (10,992  (4,539  (7,152

Repurchase of common shares

   -    (12,402  (125,785   (132,764  -    (12,402

Dividends paid

   (31,660  (53,686  (55,587   (30,168  (31,660  (53,686
                    

Net cash used by financing activities

   (25,772  (218,534  (74,270   (35,467  (25,772  (218,534
                    

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   2,697    (17,453  35,495     (2,849  2,697    (17,453

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   56,319    73,772    38,277     59,016    56,319    73,772  
                    

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $59,016   $56,319   $73,772    $56,167   $59,016   $56,319  
                    

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation:    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Worthington Industries, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or the “Company”). Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Certain priorDuring the year ended May 31, 2011 (“fiscal 2011”), we changed the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows to begin with net earnings as opposed to net earnings attributable to controlling interest. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current yearthe fiscal 2011 presentation.

Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), in which the Company ownswe own a 52% controlling interest, isand Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), in which we own a 60% controlling interest, are fully consolidated with the equity owned by the respective other joint venture member shown as noncontrolling interest on theour consolidated balance sheets, and the respective other joint venture member’s portion of net earnings includedshown as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in theour consolidated statements of earnings. Effective

In June 2009, amended accounting guidance was issued regarding the consolidation of variable-interest entities (“VIEs”). This amended guidance made significant changes to the model for determining the primary beneficiary, if any, of a VIE, and clarifies how often this assessment should be performed. We adopted this amended accounting guidance on June 1, 2009,2010. There was no impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial position upon adoption.

Deconsolidation of The Gerstenslager Company:    On May 9, 2011, The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”), the business unit comprising our Automotive Body Panels operating segment, closed an agreement with International Tooling Solutions, LLC, a tooling design and build company, to combine certain assets in a newly-formed joint venture, ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”).

Our contribution to ArtiFlex included all of our automotive body panels operations. However, we adopted new accounting guidance concerningretained the treatmentaccounts receivable and employee benefit obligations outstanding as of noncontrolling intereststhe closing date. In addition, we retained the land and building of Gerstenslager’s manufacturing facility located in consolidated financial statements. The new guidance changedWooster, Ohio (the “Wooster Facility”), which became the accountingsubject of a lease agreement with ArtiFlex upon closing of the transaction. We determined the change in our intended use of the long-lived assets to be an indicator of impairment and, reporting for minority interests, which have been recharacterized as noncontrolling interests, as discussed above. Prior period financial statements and disclosures relating to previously reported minority interests have been restatedaccordingly, performed an impairment evaluation in accordance with the new guidance. Allapplicable accounting literature. As more fully described in “Note C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets,” this evaluation resulted in an impairment charge of $6,414,000, which was recorded within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings.

In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 50% interest in ArtiFlex and certain cash and other requirementsconsideration. As more fully described in “Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” our investment in ArtiFlex is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ArtiFlex, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective May 9, 2011, resulting in a one-time gain of $15,040,000. Consistent with the impairment charges incurred in connection with the transaction, this gain was recorded within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Note M – Segment Data” for additional information regarding the impact of this transaction to our reportable business segments.

The following table summarizes the consideration received, the consideration transferred and the resulting net gain on deconsolidation:

(in thousands)    

Consideration received (at fair value):

  

Interest in ArtiFlex

  $28,404  

Cash and other consideration

   9,235  
     

Total consideration received

   37,639  

Consideration transferred (at book value)

   22,599  
     

Gain on deconsolidation

   15,040  

Less: Impairment of long-lived assets

   6,414  
     

Net gain on deconsolidation

  $8,626  
     

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ArtiFlex was recorded at its fair value as of the closing date. For additional information regarding the fair value of our interest in ArtiFlex, refer to “Note P – Fair Value.”

Deconsolidation of Dietrich Metal Framing:    On March 1, 2011, we closed an agreement with Marubeni-Itochu Steel America, Inc. (“MISA”) to combine certain assets of Dietrich Metal Framing (“Dietrich”) and ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc. in a newly-formed joint venture, Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”).

Our contribution to ClarkDietrich consisted of our metal framing business, including all of the related working capital and six of the 13 facilities. We retained and continue to operate the remaining facilities, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. We determined the change in our intended use of these long-lived assets to be an indicator of impairment and, accordingly, performed an impairment evaluation in accordance with the applicable accounting literature. Recoverability of the identified assets was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s estimate of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,293,000, which was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings.

In connection with the planned closure of the retained metal framing facilities, approximately $11,216,000 of restructuring charges were recognized during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, consisting of $7,183,000 of employee severance and $4,033,000 post-closure facility exit and other costs. These restructuring charges were also recorded within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings.

In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 25% interest in ClarkDietrich and the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. (“MMI”) steel processing locations. As more fully described in “Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” our investment in ClarkDietrich is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ClarkDietrich, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, resulting in a one-time gain of $31,319,000. Consistent with the impairment and restructuring charges incurred in connection with this transaction, this gain was recorded within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings.

The following table summarizes the consideration received, the consideration transferred and the resulting net gain on the deconsolidation:

(in thousands)    

Consideration received (at fair value):

  

MMI steel processing assets

  $72,600  

Interest in ClarkDietrich

   58,250  

Receivable for excess working capital

   4,862  
     

Total consideration received

   135,712  

Consideration transferred (at book value)

   104,393  
     

Gain on deconsolidation

   31,319  

Less: Impairment of long-lived assets

   18,293  

Restructuring charges

   11,216  
     

Net gain on deconsolidation

  $1,810  
     

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, have been applied prospectively.our interest in ClarkDietrich was recorded at its fair value as of the closing date. For additional information regarding the fair value of our interest in ClarkDietrich, refer to “Note P – Fair Value.”

Refer to “Note N – Acquisitions” for additional information regarding the accounting for the MMI steel processing assets acquired.

Use of Estimates:    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:    We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Inventories:    Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method for all inventories. We believe thatour inventories arewere valued appropriately as of May 31, 20102011 and May 31, 2009.2010.

Derivative Financial Instruments:    We do not engage in currency or commodity speculation and generally enter intoutilize derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to certain risks related to our ongoing operations. The primary risks managed through the use of derivative instruments only to hedge specificinclude interest foreignrate risk, currency orexchange risk and commodity transactions.price risk. All derivative instruments are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. Gains and losses on fair value hedges are recognized in current period earnings in the same line item as the underlying hedged item. The effective portion of gains and losses on cash flow hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and are recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings, in the same line item as the underlying hedged item. Ineffectiveness of the hedges during fiscal 2011, the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”), and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”) and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”) was immaterial. Classification in the consolidated statements of earnings of gains and losses related to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting is determined based on the underlying intent of the instruments. Cash flows related to derivative instruments are generally classified as operating activities in theour consolidated statements of cash flows within operating activities.flows.

In order for hedging relationships to qualify for hedge accounting under current accounting guidance, we formally document theeach hedging relationship and its risk management objective andobjective. This documentation includes the hedge strategy, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedge instrument’s effectiveness against offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively andas well as a description of the method of measuringused to measure hedge ineffectiveness.

Derivative instruments are executed only with highly rated financial institutions. No credit loss is anticipated on existing instruments, and no such material losses have been experienced to date. The Company continuesWe continue to monitor itsour positions, as well as the credit ratings of counterparties to those positions.

We discontinue hedge accounting when it is determined that the derivative instrument is no longer effective in offsetting the hedged risk, the derivative instrument expires or is sold, is terminated or is no longer designated as a hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur or we determine that designation of the hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative instrument is retained, we continue to carry the derivative instrument at its fair value on the consolidated balance sheetssheet and recognize any subsequent changes in its fair value in net earnings.earnings immediately. When it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, we discontinue hedge accounting and immediately recognize immediately in net earningsthe gains and losses that were accumulated in AOCI.

Refer to “Note SO – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding the consolidated balance sheetssheet location and the risk classification of the Company’sour derivative instruments.

Risks and Uncertainties:    As of May 31, 2010, the Company,2011, we, together with our unconsolidated affiliates, operated 6578 production facilities in 1814 states and 11 countries. Our largest markets are the automotive and construction and the automotive markets, each of which comprised 28%33% and 20%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2010.2011. Our foreign operations represented 6%8% of consolidated net sales, 7%5% of pre-tax earnings attributable to controlling interest, pre-tax, and 28%32% of consolidated net assets. Approximately 13%assets as of and for the Company’syear ended May 31, 2011. As of May 31, 2011, approximately 7% of our consolidated labor force iswas represented by collective bargaining agreements. This includes 608approximately 200 employees whose labor contracts expire or will otherwise require renegotiation within the fiscal year ending May 31, 20112012 (“fiscal 2011”2012”). The concentration of credit risks from financial instruments related to the markets served by the Companywe serve is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour consolidated financial position, cash flows or future results of operations.

In fiscal 2010,2011, our largest customer accounted for approximately 6% of our consolidated net sales, and our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 27%24% of our consolidated net sales. A significant loss of, or decrease in, business from any of these customers could have an adverse effect on our sales and financial results if we cannot obtain replacement business. Also, due to consolidation inwithin the industries we serve, including the construction, automotive and retail industries, our sales may be increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse developments with respect to, one or more of our largest customers.

The overall downturn in the economy, the disruption in capital and credit markets, declining real estate values and reduced consumer spending have caused significant reductions in demand from our end markets in general and, in particular, the construction and automotive end markets.

Demand in the commercial and residential construction markets has weakened as it has become more difficult for companies and consumers to obtain credit for construction projects and the economic slowdown has caused delays in or cancellations of construction projects. Our automotive business is largely driven by the production schedules of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, as well as their suppliers. The domestic auto industry is currently experiencing a very difficult operating environment, which has resulted in and will likely continue to result in lower levels of vehicle production and an associated decrease in demand for products sold to the automotive industry. Many automotive manufacturers and their suppliers are having financial difficulties and have reduced production levels and eliminated manufacturing capacity. Similar difficulties are being experienced in our other end markets and by our customers in those end markets. While the Company has taken actions to mitigate the impact of these conditions, if they persist, they could continue to adversely impact the Company’s consolidated position, cash flows and future results of operations.

Our principal raw material is flat-rolled steel, which we purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole has been cyclical, and at times availability and pricing can be volatile due to a number of factors beyond our control. This volatility can significantly affect our steel costs. In an environment of increasing prices for steel and other raw materials, in general, competitive conditions may impact how much of the price increases we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are unable to pass on future price increases in our raw materials to our customers, our financial results could be adversely affected. Also, if steel prices decrease, in general, competitive conditions may impact how quickly we must reduce our prices to our customers and we could be forced to use higher-priced raw materials to complete orders for which the selling prices have decreased. Declining steel prices could also require the Companyus to write-down the value of itsour inventories to reflect current market pricing, as was the case during fiscal 2009.pricing. Further, the number of suppliers has decreased in recent years

due to industry consolidation and the financial difficulties of certain suppliers, and consolidation may continue. Accordingly, if delivery from a major steel supplier is disrupted, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternative supply than in the past.

Receivables:    We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are properly valued and collectible. This is accomplished through two contra-receivable accounts: returns and allowances and allowance for doubtful accounts. Returns and allowances, including limited warranties on certain products, are used to record estimates of returns or other allowances resulting from quality, delivery, discounts or other issues affecting the value of receivables. This account is estimated based on historical trends and current market conditions, with the offset to net sales. The portion of the liability related to product warranties was immaterial at May 31, 2011 and 2010.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is used to record the estimated risk of loss related to the customers’ inability to pay. This allowance is maintained at a level that we consider appropriate based on factors that affect collectability, such as the financial health of the customer,our customers, historical trends of charge-offs and recoveries and current economic and market conditions. As we monitor our receivables, we identify customers that may have payment problems, and we adjust the allowance accordingly, with the offset to selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when recovery is considered remote.

We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are properly valued and collectible. Based on this review, we believe our related reserves are sized appropriately. The reserveallowance for doubtful accounts has decreased approximately $6,718,000$1,602,000 during fiscal 2010.2011 to $4,150,000. This reduction was primarily the result of the write-off of previously reserved accounts as well as reduced risk relatedand, to large automotive customers, somea lesser extent, the contribution of which have emerged from bankruptcy and others whose balances were otherwise settled.our metal framing business to the ClarkDietrich joint venture.

While we believe our allowances are adequate, changes in economic conditions, the financial health of customers and bankruptcy settlements could impact our future earnings. If the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction end markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required.

Property and Depreciation:    Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 10 to 40 years and machinery and equipment over 3 to 20 years. Depreciation expense was $57,765,000, $60,529,000 forand $60,178,000 during fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 $60,178,000 forand fiscal 2009, and $61,154,000 for fiscal 2008.respectively. Accelerated depreciation methods are used for income tax purposes.

Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets:    We use the purchase method of accounting for any business combinations initiated after June 30, 2002, and recognize amortizable intangible assets separately from goodwill. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities in an acquisition are measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets. A bargain purchase may occur, wherein the fair value of identifiable net assets exceeds the purchase price, and a gain is then recognized in the amount of that excess. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longernot amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment.impairment annually, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. The annual impairment test is performed during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. We do not have noany material intangible assets with indefinite lives other than goodwill.

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or a group of assets may not be recoverable. When a potential impairment is indicated, accounting standards require a charge to be recognized in the financial statements if the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets exceeds the fair value of that asset or group of assets. The loss recognized would be the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets.

The Company’s

Our impairment testing for both goodwill and other long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, is largely based on discounted cash flow models that require significant judgment and require assumptions about future volume trends, revenue and expense growth rates; and, in addition, external factors such as changes in economic trends and cost of capital. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could impact the outcomes of the tests performed. See “Note NC – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional details regarding these assets and related impairment testing.

Planned Maintenance Activities:    We use the deferral method to account for costs of planned maintenance shutdowns. Under this method, the costs of a qualifying shutdown are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis into maintenance expense until the next anticipated shutdown. In no case will the amortization period exceed twelve months.

Leases:    Certain lease agreements contain fluctuating or escalating payments and rent holiday periods. The related rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease term. Leasehold improvements made by the lessee, whether funded by the lessee or by landlord allowances or incentives, are recorded as leasehold improvement assets and will be amortized over the shorter of the economic life or the lease term. These incentives are also recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions in rent expense over the lease term.

Capitalized Interest:    We capitalize interest in connection with the construction of qualified assets. Under this accounting policy, we capitalized interest of $103,000, $184,000, in fiscal 2010,and $346,000 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, and $146,000 in fiscal 2008.respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation:    At May 31, 2010,2011, we had stock-based compensation plans for our employees andas well as our non-employee directors which areas described more fully in “Note FI – Stock-Based Compensation.” All share-based awards, including grants of stock options, are recorded as expense in the consolidated statements of earnings based on their grant-date fair values.

Revenue Recognition:    We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss provided evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable and the ability to collect is probable. We provide, through charges to net sales, for returns and allowances based on experience and current customer activities. We also provide, through charges to net sales, for customer rebates and sales discounts based on specific agreements and recent and anticipated levels of customer activity. In circumstances where the collection of payment is highly questionable at the time of shipment, we defer recognition of revenue until payment is collected. As of May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we had deferred $9,304,000 of revenue related to pricing disputes. See “Note G – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” for additional information regarding this item and related litigation during fiscal 2010.

Within our Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs businesses,The business units that comprise the Worthington Global Group (the “Global Group”) operating segment, which representedhave contributed less than 5%5.0% of consolidated net sales for each of the last three fiscal years, recognize revenue is recognized on a percentage-of-completion method. Refer to “Note M – Segment Data” for additional information regarding the recently-formed Global Group operating segment.

Advertising Expense:    We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $3,817,000, $3,838,000, $4,813,000, and $4,220,000$4,813,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs:    Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales, and shipping and handling costs incurred are included in cost of goods sold.

Environmental Costs:    Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the property, increase its capacity, and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and clean up are charged to expense.

Statements of Cash Flows:    Supplemental cash flow information was as follows for the fiscal years ended May 31 is as follows:31:

 

(in thousands)  2010   2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

  $9,814    $20,964  $21,442  $17,358    $9,814    $20,964  

Income taxes paid, net of (refunds)

   (1,601   41,679   29,641   53,194     (1,601   41,679  

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received on the investments are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows inas operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of the cumulative equity in the net earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing activityactivities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Income Taxes:    We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and the financial reporting basis of our assets and liabilities. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some, or a portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

Tax benefits from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the consolidated financial statements are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

We have reserves for taxes and associated interest and penalties that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by taxing authorities. It is our policy to record these in income tax expense. While we believe the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are appropriate, we have established the tax and interest reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge our positions. The tax reserves are analyzed periodically, and adjustments are made as events occur to warrant adjustment to the reserves, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues and release of administrative guidance or court decisions affecting a particular tax issue.

Self-Insurance Reserves:    We are largely self-insured with respect to workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability, property damage, employee medical claims and other potential losses. In order to reduce risk and better manage our overall loss exposure, we purchase stop-loss insurance that covers individual claims in excess of the deductible amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to settle open claims, which includes estimates of legal costs expected to be incurred, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on actuarial valuations that take into consideration the historical average claim volume, the average cost for settled claims, current trends in claim costs, changes in our business and workforce, general economic factors and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimated reserves for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from assumptions used and historical trends.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:    On September 15, 2009,In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) became the single sourcepresentation of authoritativecomprehensive income in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Codification changedThis new guidance requires entities to present reclassification adjustments included in other comprehensive income on the referencingface of the financial standardsstatements and allows entities to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but did not change or alter existing U.S. GAAP. The Codification became effectiveconsecutive statements. It also eliminates the option for entities to present the Company incomponents of other comprehensive income as part of the second quarterstatement of fiscal 2010.

In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to theequity. For public companies, this accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets. This amendment removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale. This amendment also requires additional disclosures about any transfers of financial assets and a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. This amendmentguidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and(and interim periods within those fiscal years.years) beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Retrospective application to prior periods is required. The adoption of this amendment effective June 1, 2010 will result in recognition on the consolidated balance sheets of our trade accounts receivable securitization facility (see the description within “Note C – Debt and Receivables Securitization” for details regarding this facility).

In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for variable interest entities. This amendment changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the purpose and design of the other entity and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact its economic performance. The amendment also requires additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. This amendment isnew guidance, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Worthington will adopt this amendmentus on June 1, 2010; and, while we continue to fully evaluate the anticipated impacts, that adoption2012, is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position or results of operations.

In May 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that resulted in common fair value measurements and disclosures under both U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This amended guidance is explanatory in nature and does not require additional fair value measurements nor is it

intended to result in significant changes in the application of current guidance. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance, effective for us on March 1, 2012, to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2009, amended accounting guidance was issued for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This amended guidance sets forth requirements that must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from a sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not been delivered. Additionally, the amended guidance requires more disclosure about an entity’s multiple-element arrangements. This amended guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance on June 1, 2011, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

Our investments in affiliated companies that we do not control, either through majority ownership or otherwise, are accounted for using the equity method. At May 31, 2011, these equity investments and the percentage interests owned consisted of: ArtiFlex (50%), ClarkDietrich (25%), Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC (the “Gestamp JV”) (50%), LEFCO Worthington, LLC (49%), Samuel Steel Pickling Company (31%), Serviacero Planos, S. de R. L. de C.V. (50%), TWB Company, L.L.C. (45%), Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”) (50%), Worthington Modern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (“WMSFMCo.”) (40%), and Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”) (51%). WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

On May 9, 2011, we joined with International Tooling Solutions, LLC to form ArtiFlex, a joint venture that provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. We contributed our automotive body panels business in exchange for a 50% ownership interest. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our investment in ArtiFlex was recognized at fair value based on the total enterprise fair value of the joint venture of approximately $56,808,000. This amount exceeded the book value of the underlying equity in the net assets of the joint venture by approximately $31,098,000. Our share of this excess fair value, or cost, is included within the carrying value of our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate and recognized as an adjustment to equity income in periods subsequent to acquisition. We attributed this excess fair value to the following assets:

(in thousands)    

Inventories(1)

  $1,900  

Intangible assets(2)

   8,200  

Property, plant and equipment, net(3)

   8,198  
     

Total identifiable assets

   18,298  

Equity method goodwill(4)

   12,800  
     

Total excess fair value

  $31,098  
     

(1)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income as the related inventories are sold.

(2)

Includes $7,500,000 related to definite-lived intangible assets. This amount will be amortized to equity income over the estimated useful lives of those assets. The remaining $700,000 relates to intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, which will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

(3)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income over the estimated useful lives of the related assets in a manner consistent with depreciation.

(4)

Will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

On March 18, 2011, we joined with Gestamp Renewables group to create the Gestamp JV, a joint venture focused on producing towers for wind turbines being constructed in North America. This 50%-owned unconsolidated joint venture has identified Cheyenne, Wyoming as the site of the initial production facility. We anticipate contributing approximately $9,500,000 of cash to the Gestamp JV, mostly in fiscal 2012. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

On March 1, 2011, we joined with ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc. to form ClarkDietrich, a joint venture that manufactures a full line of drywall studs and accessories, structural studs and joists, metal lath and accessories, and shaft wall studs and track used primarily in residential and commercial construction. We contributed our metal framing business and related working capital in exchange for a 25% ownership interest in ClarkDietrich in addition to the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. steel processing locations. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our investment in ClarkDietrich was recognized at fair value based on the total enterprise fair value of the joint venture of approximately $233,000,000. This amount exceeded the book value of the underlying equity in the net assets of the joint venture by approximately $20,320,000. Our share of this excess fair value, or cost, is included within the carrying value of our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate and recognized as an adjustment to equity income in periods subsequent to acquisition. We attributed this excess fair value to the following assets:

(in thousands)    

Inventories(1)

  $15,000  

Intangible assets(2)

   14,400  

Property, plant and equipment, net(3)

   (10,180
     

Total identifiable assets

   19,220  

Equity method goodwill(4)

   1,100  
     

Total excess fair value

  $20,320  
     

(1)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income as the related inventories are sold.

(2)

Includes $8,960,000 related to definite-lived intangible assets. This amount will be amortized to equity income over the estimated useful lives of those assets. The remaining $5,440,000 relates to intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, which will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

(3)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income over the estimated useful lives of the related assets in a manner consistent with depreciation.

(4)

Will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

On November 19, 2010, we joined with Hubei Modern Urban Construction and Development Group Co., Ltd. to create WMSFMCo. We contributed approximately $6,200,000 of cash in exchange for a 40% ownership interest. The purpose of WMSFMCo. is to design, manufacture, assemble and distribute steel framing materials and accessories for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and to provide project management and building design and construction supply services thereto. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

As further discussed in “Note N – Acquisitions,” Worthington acquired certain assets from Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Gibraltar”) on February 1, 2010. Included in the assets acquired was a 31.25% ownership interest in Samuel Steel Pickling Company, a joint venture which operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and another in Cleveland, Ohio. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

During May 2009, we sold our 50% equity interest in Accelerated Building Technologies, LLC to NOVA Chemicals Corporation, the other member of the joint venture. The sales price and loss on the transaction were immaterial.

During January 2009, we sold our 60% equity interest in Aegis Metal Framing, LLC for approximately $24,000,000 to MiTek Industries, Inc., the other member of the joint venture. This resulted in a gain of $8,331,000. This gain was recognized in a separate line item in our consolidated statements of earnings below operating income.

During October 2008, we sold our 49% equity interest in Canessa Worthington Slovakia s.r.o. for approximately $3,700,000 to the Magnetto Group, the other member of the joint venture. The gain on the transaction was immaterial.

On October 1, 2008, we expanded and modified WSP, our joint venture with United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”). U.S. Steel contributed ProCoil Company, L.L.C., its steel processing facility in Canton, Michigan, and we contributed $2,500,000 of cash and Worthington Steel Taylor, our steel processing subsidiary in Taylor, Michigan, which had a book value of $13,851,000.

On June 2, 2008, we made an additional capital contribution of $392,000 to Viking & Worthington Steel Enterprise, LLC (“VWSE”). The other member in the joint venture did not make its contribution as required by the operating agreement. As a result, we now own 100% of VWSE, which has been fully consolidated in our financial statements since the beginning of fiscal 2009. VWSE has closed its manufacturing operations and its business is being handled by the consolidated operations of the Steel Processing operating segment.

We received distributions from unconsolidated affiliates totaling $57,146,000, $52,970,000 and $80,580,000 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. We have received cumulative distributions from WAVE in excess of our investment balance, which resulted in an amount recorded within other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets of $10,715,000 and $18,385,000 at May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, we reclassify the negative balance to the liability section of our consolidated balance sheet. We will continue to record our equity in the net income of WAVE as a debit to the investment account, and if it becomes positive, it will again be shown as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet. If it becomes obvious that any excess distribution may not be returned (upon joint venture liquidation or otherwise), we will recognize any balance classified as a liability as income immediately.

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows as operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of the cumulative equity in the net earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Combined financial information for affiliated companies accounted for using the equity method as of, and for the years ended, May 31, was as follows:

(in thousands)  2011   2010   2009 

Cash

  $122,938    $75,762    $72,103  

Other current assets

   474,284     199,288     165,615  

Noncurrent assets

   260,805     170,787     167,779  
               

Total assets

  $858,027    $445,837    $405,497  
               

Current liabilities

  $184,467    $85,514    $57,995  

Long-term debt

   150,229     150,212     150,596  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   5,365     10,244     24,373  

Equity

   517,966     199,867     172,533  
               

Total liabilities and equity

  $858,027    $445,837    $405,497  
               

Net sales

  $1,034,431    $708,779    $719,635  

Gross margin

   238,083     189,622     175,832  

Depreciation and amortization

   11,452     10,690     14,044  

Interest expense

   1,512     1,482     3,708  

Income tax expense

   10,126     5,625     7,101  

Net earnings

   156,679     127,837     102,071  

At May 31, 2011, $27,020,000 of our consolidated retained earnings represented undistributed earnings, net of tax, of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Note C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

Impairment of Definite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Impairment testing involves a comparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value.

Fiscal 2011:    During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment that were not contributed to ArtiFlex, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $6,414,000. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation, as more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived within our Metal Framing operating segment that were not contributed to ClarkDietrich, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified assets was tested using future cash

flow projections based on management’s estimate of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,293,000. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation and related restructuring charges, as more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Commercial Stairs business unit, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $2,473,000, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,913,000, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Metal Framing and Steel Packaging operating segments, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets of our consolidated joint venture, Spartan, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset group was more than the net book value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Fiscal 2010:    During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Processing operating segment, we determined that indicators of impairment were present. Therefore, long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing and then Construction Services operating segments during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the identified metal framing assets was more than the related net book value of the asset group. Therefore, there was no impairment charges were recognized with regard to these long-lived assets.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to an identified asset group within the then Construction Services operating segment was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge of $8,055,000 was recognized during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. This impairment charge was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at February 28, 2010. The impaired assets consisted largely of customer lists and also included trade name and technology assets. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing and then Construction Services operating segments during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, the identified assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarters ended August 31, 2009 and November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the corresponding net book value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting the Steel Packaging operating segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, those long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Steel Packaging asset group was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge of $2,703,000 was recognized. This impairment charge was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at November 30, 2009. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    Purchased goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may be present. Application of goodwill impairment testing involves judgment, including but not limited to, the identification of reporting units and estimating the fair value of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that the characteristics of the reporting units within each operating segment are similar and allow for their aggregation in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of each operating segment, determined using discounted cash flows, to each operating segment’s respective carrying value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment is indicated. The amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the net assets of the operating segment, excluding goodwill, to its estimated fair value, with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is lower than its carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated statements of earnings.

Fiscal 2011:    During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed our annual impairment evaluation of goodwill. The estimated fair value of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, the only reporting unit with goodwill throughout fiscal 2011, exceeded its carrying value by a substantial amount and, therefore, no impairment charges were recognized. However, future declines in the market and deterioration in earnings could lead to impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets in subsequent periods.

Fiscal 2010:    Due to industry changes, weakness in the construction market and the depressed results in the then Construction Services operating segment, we determined that indicators of impairment were present and, therefore, tested the goodwill of this operating segment for impairment on a quarterly basis throughout fiscal 2010. Given the significant decline in, and continued uncertainty of, the construction market throughout the first half of fiscal 2010, during the third quarter, we revised downward the forecasted cash flows used in our impairment evaluation. After reviewing the revised valuation and the fair value estimates of the remaining net assets, it was determined that the value of the business no longer supported its goodwill balance of $24,651,000. As a result, the full amount was written-off during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed our annual impairment evaluation of the remaining goodwill balance, consisting solely of goodwill within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. The estimated fair value of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment exceeded its carrying value by a substantial amount and, therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010, by reportable business segment, were as follows:

   Pressure
Cylinders
  Metal
Framing
  Other  Total 
(in thousands)             

Balance at June 1, 2009

     

Goodwill

  $76,692   $96,943   $24,651   $198,286  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    (96,943  -    (96,943
                 
   76,692    -    24,651    101,343  

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   5,495    -    -    5,495  

Translation adjustments

   (2,644  -    -    (2,644

Impairment losses

   -    -    (24,651  (24,651
                 

Balance at May 31, 2010

     

Goodwill

   79,543    96,943    24,651    201,137  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    (96,943  (24,651  (121,594
                 
   79,543    -    -    79,543  
                 

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   11,536    -    -    11,536  

Translation adjustments

   2,554    -    -    2,554  
                 

Balance at May 31, 2011

     

Goodwill

   93,633    96,943    24,651    215,227  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    (96,943  (24,651  (121,594
                 
  $93,633   $-   $-   $93,633  
                 

The fiscal 2010 decrease in goodwill within Other was due to the write-off of the entire goodwill balance of our then Construction Services operating segment during the quarter ended February 28, 2010.

The increase in goodwill within Pressure Cylinders during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 resulted primarily from acquisitions completed during those respective fiscal years. For additional information regarding these acquisitions, refer to “Note N – Acquisitions.”

Amortizable intangible assets by class were as follows at May 31:

   2011   2010 
(in thousands)  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
   Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
 

Patents and trademarks

  $5,034    $2,706    $13,119    $8,246  

Customer relationships

   23,587     7,935     23,443     6,775  

Non-compete agreements

   1,893     1,525     2,100     1,844  

Other

   2,132     521     3,070     903  
                    

Total

  $32,646    $12,688    $41,732    $17,768  
                    

The net decrease in amortizable intangible assets was driven largely by the contribution of certain intangible assets to ClarkDietrich, partially offset by the previously noted acquisitions completed by our Pressure Cylinders operating segment in fiscal 2011. Currency translation adjustments comprised the remainder of the change in cost basis.

Amortization expense was $3,293,000, $4,124,000 and $3,896,000 during fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. These intangible assets are amortized on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to 20 years.

Estimated amortization expense for these intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is as follows:

(in thousands)    

2012

  $2,395  

2013

   2,146  

2014

   2,096  

2015

   2,083  

2016

   2,009  

Note D – Restructuring and Other Expense

In fiscal 2008, we initiated a Transformation Plan (the “Transformation Plan”) with the overall goal to improve our sustainable earnings potential, asset utilization and operational performance. The Transformation Plan focuses on cost reduction, margin expansion and organizational capability improvements and, in the process, seeks to drive excellence in three core competencies: sales; operations; and supply chain management. The Transformation Plan is comprehensive in scope and includes aggressive diagnostic and implementation phases. As a result of the Transformation Plan and its related efforts, we have incurred certain asset impairments which have been included within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings. Asset impairment charges that are not a result of these efforts have been included within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, except for the impairment charges incurred in connection with the formations of the unconsolidated joint ventures, ArtiFlex and ClarkDietrich, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. As more fully discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” these impairment charges were recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings.

To date, we have completed the transformation phases in each of the core facilities within our Steel Processing operating segment, including the facilities of our Mexican joint venture. We also substantially completed the transformation phases at our metal framing facilities prior to their contribution to ClarkDietrich.

We expect to incur additional restructuring charges relating to the Transformation Plan. These expenses relate to actions taken to date and consist primarily of severance, non-cash impairment losses and accelerated depreciation expense for impacted assets. In addition, we plan to initiate the diagnostics phase in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment during fiscal 2012.

As this process began, we retained a consulting firm to assist in the development and implementation of the Transformation Plan. The services provided by this firm included assistance through diagnostic tools, performance improvement technologies, project management techniques, benchmarking information and insights that directly related to the Transformation Plan. Accordingly, the firm’s fees were included in restructuring charges. As it progressed, we formed internal teams dedicated to this effort, and they ultimately assumed full responsibility for executing the Transformation Plan.

These internal teams are now an integral part of our business and constitute what we refer to as the Centers of Excellence (“COE”). The COE will continue to monitor the performance metrics andnew processes instituted across our transformed operations and drive continuous improvements in all areas of our operations. The majority of the expenses related to the COE will be included in SG&A expense going forward.

Since the initiation of the Transformation Plan, the following actions have been taken:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, an initial headcount reduction plan was put into place, utilizing a combination of voluntary retirement and severance packages. A total of 63 individuals were impacted.

On September 25, 2007, we announced the closure or downsizing of five locations in our Metal Framing segment. These actions were completed as of May 31, 2008 and included headcount reductions of approximately 165.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Metal Framing corporate offices were moved from Pittsburgh and Blairsville, Pennsylvania, to Columbus, Ohio. Headcount was reduced by 33.

On October 23, 2008, we announced the closure of two facilities, one Steel Processing (Louisville, Kentucky) and one Metal Framing (Renton, Washington), as well as headcount reductions of 282. The Louisville facility was closed on February 28, 2009, and the Renton facility closed on December 31, 2008. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the remaining assets of the

Louisville facility were sold, resulting in a gain of $1,003,000. This gain has been classified within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

On December 5, 2008, we announced the closure and/or suspension of operations at three Metal Framing facilities and headcount reductions in Steel Processing of 186. The Lunenburg, Massachusetts, facility closed and operations were suspended in Miami, Florida, and Phoenix, Arizona, on February 28, 2009. The associated headcount impact for Metal Framing was a reduction of 125.

The decision was made during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to close the Joliet, Illinois, Metal Framing facility. A majority of the roll forming operation located at that facility was moved to the Hammond, Indiana, facility during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Approximately $1,717,000 of impairment was recognized during fiscal 2010 related to this closure.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, additional headcount reductions took place across locations within the Metal Framing, Military Construction and Mid-Rise Construction operating segments. A total of 113 individuals were impacted.

In February 2010, the Rock Hill, South Carolina, Steel Processing facility met the held for sale classification criteria under applicable accounting guidance. The $1,165,000 carrying value of that facility, which was determined to be below fair value, was included within assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010.

In May 2010, certain of the Buffalo, New York, Steel Processing equipment met the held for sale classification criteria under applicable accounting guidance. After an immaterial adjustment to fair value, the $1,315,000 carrying value of that equipment was included within assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010.

Execution of the Transformation Plan continued throughout several facilities in our Steel Processing and Metal Framing operating segments during fiscal 2011, resulting in $3,726,000 of expense, which was recorded within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

During fiscal 2011, certain assets within our Steel Processing operating segment classified as held for sale at May 31, 2010, were disposed of resulting in a net gain of $828,000. Also during fiscal 2011, certain assets within our Metal Framing operating segment were disposed of resulting in a net gain of $245,000. These gains were recorded within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

On March 1, 2011, we completed the contribution of our metal framing business, including six of the 13 facilities, to ClarkDietrich. As more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” following a brief transition period, the retained facilities will be disposed of.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, in connection with the planned closure of these retained facilities, approximately $11,216,000 of restructuring charges were incurred, consisting of $7,183,000 of employee severance and $4,033,000 of post-closure facility exit and other costs. These charges were recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statements of earnings to correspond with the related gain on deconsolidation and the subsequent impairment charges incurred in connection with the metal framing facilities retained. Refer to “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information regarding this transaction.

A progression of the liabilities created as part of the Transformation Plan, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line item in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2010, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  5/31/2009
Liability
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments  5/31/2010
Liability
 

Early retirement and severance

  $3,201    $3,948   $(6,223 $(33 $893  

Professional fees and other costs

   999     3,160    (3,599  -    560  
                      
  $4,200     7,108   $(9,822 $(33 $1,453  
                   

Non-cash charges

     3,408     

Net gain on dispositions

     (4,336   

Other

     (1,937   
          

Restructuring and other expense

    $4,243     
          

A progression of the liabilities created as part of the Transformation Plan, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line item in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2011, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  5/31/2010
Liability
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments  5/31/2011
Liability
 

Early retirement and severance

  $893    $8,687   $(2,371 $11   $7,220  

Facility exit and other costs

   560     6,052    (6,030  (173  409  
                      
  $1,453     14,739   $(8,401 $(162 $7,629  
                   

Non-cash charges

     203     

Net gain on dispositions

     (1,073   

Joint venture transactions

     (11,216   
          

Restructuring and other expense

    $2,653     
          

Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

During fiscal 2011, we were involved in a dispute with a former customer, Irwin Industrial Tool Company (d/b/a BernzOmatic), a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (“Bernz”). The dispute related primarily to our early termination of a three-year supply contract (the “Contract”) on March 1, 2007 as a result of certain actions taken by Bernz that we believed breached the Contract, and the resulting price increases charged to Bernz during 2007 and 2008 after such early termination. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, this dispute was litigated and a jury awarded contract damages relating to the price increases and other items to Bernz of approximately $13,002,000, which was $3,698,000 in excess of our recorded reserve. Accordingly, we recorded a pre-tax charge within SG&A expense in an equal amount during the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the trial judge ruled on various post-trial motions that had been filed by the parties, and awarded Bernz pre-judgment interest of $1,828,000 and attorneys’ fees and costs of $970,000. This additional award exceeded the amount anticipated by us by approximately $1,400,000. As a result of the post-trial rulings, an additional pre-tax charge of $1,400,000 was recorded within the Pressure Cylinders operating segment as SG&A expense, increasing our reserves related to this matter to $14,402,000.

On July 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Bernz for cash consideration of approximately $51,000,000, which included the settlement of this dispute. Refer to “Note T – Subsequent Events” for additional information regarding our acquisition of Bernz.

We are defendants in certain other legal actions. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these actions, which is not clearly determinable at the present time, would not significantly affect our consolidated financial position or future results of operations. We also believe that environmental issues will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or future results of operations.

To secure access to a facility used to regenerate acid used in certain Steel Processing locations, we have entered into unconditional purchase obligations with a third party under which three of our Steel Processing facilities deliver their spent acid for processing annually through the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. In addition, we are required to pay for freight and utilities used in regenerating the spent acid. Total net payments to this third party were $4,347,000, $4,270,000 and $4,948,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. At May 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of future payments required under this arrangement for the next five fiscal years and thereafter was as follows:

(in thousands)    

2012

  $2,367  

2013

   2,367  

2014

   2,367  

2015

   2,367  

2016

   2,367  

Thereafter

   7,101  
     

Total

  $18,936  
     

We may terminate the unconditional purchase obligations at any time by purchasing this facility at its then fair market value.

Note F – Guarantees

We do not have guarantees that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of May 31, 2011, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which we have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately $15,855,000 at May 31, 2011. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a $5,000,000 term loan held by one of our unconsolidated affiliates, ArtiFlex. Based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to these guarantees, and determined that the fair value of our obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material.

We also had in place $8,950,000 of outstanding stand-by letters of credit as of May 31, 2011. These letters of credit were issued to third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at May 31, 2011. The fair value of these guarantee instruments, based on premiums paid, was not material at May 31, 2011.

Note G – Debt and Receivables Securitization

The following table summarizes our long-term debt and other short-term borrowings outstanding at May 31:

(in thousands)  2011   2010 

Short-term borrowings

  $132,956    $-  

Floating rate senior notes due December 17, 2014

   100,000     100,000  

6.50% senior notes due April 15, 2020

   149,854     149,838  

Other

   400     400  
          

Total debt

   383,210     250,238  

Less: current maturities and short-term borrowings

   132,956     -  
          

Total long-term debt

  $250,254    $250,238  
          

At May 31, 2011, we had $100,000,000 of unsecured floating rate senior notes outstanding, which are due on December 17, 2014 (the “2014 Notes”) and bear interest at a variable rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. However, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby we receive interest on the $100,000,000 notional amount at the six-month LIBOR rate and we pay interest on the same notional amount at a fixed rate of 4.46%, effectively fixing the interest rate at 5.26%. See “Note O – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding this interest rate swap agreement.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due on April 15, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The 2020 Notes were sold to the public at 99.890% of the principal amount thereof, to yield 6.515% to maturity. We used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under our multi-year revolving credit facility and amounts then outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The proceeds on the issuance of the 2020 Notes were reduced for debt discount ($165,000), payment of debt issuance costs ($1,535,000) and settlement of a hedging instrument entered into in anticipation of the issuance of the 2020 Notes ($1,358,000). The debt discount, debt issuance costs and loss from treasury lock derivative are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets within long-term debt as a contra-liability, short- and long-term other assets and AOCI, respectively. Each will be recognized, through interest expense, in our consolidated statements of earnings over the term of the 2020 Notes.

We also maintain a $100,000,000 revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”), which expires in January 2012. The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $100,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-sell, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value due to its short-term nature. As of May 31, 2011, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $100,000,000 limit and $90,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

In June 2009, amended accounting guidance was issued with respect to the accounting for and disclosure of transfers of financial assets. This amended guidance impacts new transfers of many types of financial assets, including but not limited to factoring arrangements and sales of trade receivables, mortgages and installment loans. We adopted this amended accounting guidance on June 1, 2010. Upon adoption, it was determined that asset transfers to the AR facility no longer qualified for sales treatment. Accordingly, the $90,000,000 of net proceeds received and outstanding at May 31, 2011 are classified as short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets and as net proceeds from short-term borrowings in our consolidated statements of cash flows. Asset transfers prior to June 1, 2010, qualified for sales treatment and were therefore recorded as a reduction in the accounts receivable balance. As of May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, the $45,000,000 and $60,000,000, respectively, in proceeds from the AR Facility were recorded as a reduction in the accounts receivable balance. Facility fees incurred after the adoption of the amended accounting guidance have been classified as interest expense. In contrast, facility fees incurred prior to June 1, 2010, were classified as miscellaneous expense. Facility fees of $1,148,000, $1,172,000, and $2,628,000 were incurred during fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.

Short-term borrowings outstanding at May 31, 2011, also included $41,532,000 of borrowings under our unsecured $400,000,000 multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders. The

Credit Facility matures in May 2013. In September 2010, a $35,000,000 commitment by one lender expired, reducing our borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility to $400,000,000. Borrowings under the Credit Facility have maturities of less than one year. Interest rates on borrowings and related facility fees are based on our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings as assigned by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The average variable rate was 0.87% at May 31, 2011. There was no outstanding balance under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2010. Additionally, and as discussed in “Note F – Guarantees,” we provided $8,950,000 in letters of credit for third-party beneficiaries as of May 31, 2011. While not drawn against at May 31, 2011, these letters of credit are issued against availability under the Credit Facility, leaving $349,518,000 available under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2011.

The remaining balance of short-term borrowings at May 31, 2011, consisted of $1,424,000 outstanding under a $9,500,000 credit facility maintained by our consolidated joint venture, WNCL. This credit facility matures in November 2011 and bears interest at a variable rate. The applicable variable rate was 13.5% at May 31, 2011.

Maturities on long-term debt and other short-term borrowings in the next five fiscal years, and the remaining years thereafter, are as follows:

(in thousands)    

2012

  $132,956  

2013

   80  

2014

   80  

2015

   100,080  

2016

   80  

Thereafter

   149,934  
     

Total

  $383,210  
     

Note H – Equity

Preferred Shares:    The Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended Articles of Incorporation authorize two classes of preferred shares and their relative voting rights. The Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. is empowered to determine the issue prices, dividend rates, amounts payable upon liquidation and other terms of the preferred shares when issued. No preferred shares are issued or outstanding.

Common Shares:    On September 26, 2007, Worthington Industries, Inc. announced that the Board of Directors (the “Board”) had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries, Inc.’sour outstanding common shares.shares under a new repurchase authorization. A total of 8,449,500494,802 common shares remained available under this repurchase authorization as ofat May 31, 2010.2011. The common shares available for purchase under this authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations and general economic conditions. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During fiscal 2011, we paid $132,764,000 to repurchase 7,954,698 of our common shares. No common share repurchases were made under this authorization during fiscal 2010. Subsequent to May 31, 2011, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 of our common shares under a separate repurchase authorization. Refer to “Note T – Subsequent Events” for additional information.

The

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:    At May 31, 2011, the components of AOCI, net of tax, at May 31 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  2010   2009 

Unrealized gain on investment

  $-    $(5

Foreign currency translation

   442     14,181  

Defined benefit pension liability

   (4,695   (5,012

Cash flow hedges

   (6,378   (4,707
          

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  $(10,631  $4,457  
          

(in thousands)  2011   2010 

Foreign currency translation

  $13,448    $442  

Defined benefit pension liability

   (3,253   (4,695

Cash flow hedges

   (6,220   (6,378
          

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  $3,975    $(10,631
          

A net loss of $2,431,000 (net of tax of $1,487,000), a net loss of $2,219,000 (net of tax of $1,222,000), and a net gain of $445,000 (net of tax of $234,000) and net gain of $7,514,000 (net of tax of $3,719,000) were reclassified from AOCI for cash flow hedges in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, and fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, respectively.

The estimated net amount of the existing losses in AOCI at May 31, 20102011 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months was $953,000$1,220,000 (net of tax of $525,000)$610,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2010,2011, and will change before actual reclassification from AOCI to net earnings during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011.2012.

Note C – Debt and Receivables Securitization

Debt at May 31 is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  2010  2009

Notes payable

  $-  $980

6.70% senior notes due December 1, 2009

   -   138,000

Floating rate senior notes due December 17, 2014

   100,000   100,000

6.50% senior notes due April 15, 2020

   149,838   -

Other

   400   413
        

Total debt

   250,238   239,393

Less current maturities and notes payable

   -   138,993
        

Total long-term debt

  $250,238  $100,400
        

At May 31, 2009, our notes payable consisted of $980,000 of borrowings under our unsecured $435,000,000 multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) with a group of lenders. The Facility matures in May 2013, except for a $35,000,000 commitment by one lender, which expires in September 2010. Borrowings under the Facility have maturities of less than one year. Interest rates on borrowings and related facility fees are based on our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings as assigned by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The average variable rate was 0.90% at May 31, 2009. There was no outstanding balance under the Facility at May 31, 2010. Additionally, and as discussed in “Note O – Guarantees and Warranties,” we provided $8,260,000 in letters of credit for third-party beneficiaries as of May 31, 2010. While not drawn against at May 31, 2010, these letters of credit are issued against availability under the Facility, leaving $426,740,000 available under the Facility at May 31, 2010.

On June 12, 2009, we redeemed $118,545,000 of the then $138,000,000 outstanding 6.70% senior notes due December 1, 2009 (the “2009 Notes”). The consideration paid for the 2009 Notes was $1,025 per $1,000 principal amount of the 2009 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The remainder of the 2009 Notes became due and were redeemed, at face value, on December 1, 2009. The redemptions were funded by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under existing credit facilities.

Additionally, at May 31, 2010, we had $100,000,000 unsecured floating rate senior notes outstanding, which are due on December 17, 2014 (the “2014 Notes”) and bear interest at a variable rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. However, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby we receive interest on the $100,000,000 notional amount at the six-month LIBOR rate and we pay interest on the same notional amount at a fixed rate of 4.46%, effectively fixing the interest rate at 5.26%. See “Note S – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The 2020 Notes were sold to the

public at 99.890% of the principal amount thereof, to yield 6.515% to maturity. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and amounts then outstanding under its revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The proceeds on the issuance of the 2020 Notes were reduced for debt discount ($165,000), payment of debt issuance costs ($1,535,000) and settlement of a hedging instrument entered into in anticipation of the issuance of the 2020 Notes ($1,358,000). The debt discount, debt issuance costs and loss from treasury lock derivative are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets within long-term debt as a contra-liability, short- and long-term other assets and AOCI, respectively. Each will be recognized, through interest expense, in the consolidated statements of earnings over the term of the 2020 Notes.

We maintain a $100,000,000 revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility, which expires in January 2011 (the “AR Facility”). The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. Transactions under the AR Facility have been accounted for as sales. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $100,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-sell, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, receivables from certain foreign customers, concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. Facility fees of $1,172,000, $2,628,000, and $341,000 were incurred during fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively, and were recorded as miscellaneous expense. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value. Accounts receivable sold under the AR Facility are excluded from accounts receivable in the consolidated financial statements. As of May 31, 2010, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $100,000,000 limit, and $45,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

The adoption of certain U.S. GAAP amendments effective June 1, 2010, as discussed within “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” will result in recognition on the consolidated balance sheets of the AR Facility. Recognition on the consolidated balance sheets will include reporting of amounts sold under the AR Facility as accounts receivable and outstanding secured borrowings. Also, prospectively upon adoption, related Facility fees will be treated as interest expense in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Principal payments due on long-term debt in the next five fiscal years, and the remaining years thereafter, are as follows:

(in thousands)   

2011

  $-

2012

   -

2013

   80

2014

   80

2015

   100,080

Thereafter

   150,160
    

Total

  $250,400
    

Note D – Income Taxes

Earnings (loss) before income taxes for the years ended May 31 include the following components:

(in thousands)  2010  2009   2008

United States based operations

  $73,122  $(170,405  $102,386

Non - United States based operations

   5,035   28,966     50,275
             

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

   78,157   (141,439   152,661
             

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest*

   6,266   4,529     6,968
             

Earnings (loss) before income taxes attributable to controlling interest

  $71,891  $(145,968  $145,693
             

*

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest are not taxable to Worthington. Significant components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31 were as follows:

(in thousands)  2010   2009   2008 

Current:

      

Federal

  $30,080    $(21,609  $29,969  

State and local

   1,333     3,146     2,617  

Foreign

   1,347     6,188     9,258  
               
   32,760     (12,275   41,844  

Deferred:

      

Federal

   (6,804   (19,393   (3,038

State

   1,399     (4,359   (1,601

Foreign

   (705   (1,727   1,411  
               
   (6,110   (25,479   (3,228
               
  $26,650    $(37,754  $38,616  
               

Tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were credited to additional paid-in capital were $6,000, $433,000, and $2,035,000 for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. Tax benefits (expenses) related to defined benefit pension liability that were credited to (deducted from) other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) were $1,163,000, $14,000, and ($44,000) for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. Tax benefits (expenses) related to cash flow hedges that were credited to (deducted from) OCI were $854,000, $3,187,000, and $6,290,000 for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. The tax benefits related to the gain from the dilution of our interest in TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”), as a result of our partner’s contribution to this unconsolidated joint venture, credited to additional paid-in capital were $1,031,000 for fiscal 2008 (see “Note J – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates”).

A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent to total tax provision (benefit) follows:

   2010  2009  2008 

Federal statutory rate

  35.0 35.0 35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

  (1.5 2.3   0.4  

Change in state and local valuation allowances

  5.0   (0.7 0.3  

Change in income tax accruals for resolution of tax audits and change in estimate of deferred tax

  1.6   (0.1 (1.7

Non-U.S. income taxes at other than 35%

  (1.6 3.9   (4.6

Qualified production activities deduction

  (2.1 -   (0.6

Goodwill impairment non-deductible

  -   (13.9 -  

Other

  0.7   (0.6 (2.3
          

Effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest

  37.1 25.9 26.5
          

The above effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest excludes any impact from the inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings. The effective tax rates upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest were 34.1%, 26.7% and 25.3% for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. The change in effective income tax rates, upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest, is a result of the nature of Spartan as an entity that pays no federal income tax, but instead distributes its income to its investors, where it becomes taxable. As a result, net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest do not generate tax expense for Worthington.

Under applicable accounting guidance, a tax benefit may be recognized from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax benefits recognized in our financial statements from such a position were measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $5,933,000, $3,897,000, and $2,093,000 as of May 31, 2010, May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was $3,935,000 as of May 31, 2010. Unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken, or expected to be taken in a tax return, and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes. Accrued amounts of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as part of income tax expense within our consolidated statements of earnings. As of May 31, 2010, May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008, we had accrued liabilities of $1,232,000, $1,143,000, and $720,000, respectively, for interest and penalties within the unrecognized tax benefits.

A tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits follows:

(in thousands)    

Balance at June 1, 2009

  $3,897  

Increases – tax positions taken in prior years

   1,538  

Decreases – tax positions taken in prior years

   -  

Increases – current tax positions

   1,177  

Decreases – current tax positions

   -  

Settlements

   (541

Lapse of statutes of limitations

   (138
     

Balance at May 31, 2010

  $5,933  
     

Approximately $1,200,000 of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to be settled in the next twelve months due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in various tax jurisdictions and as a result of expected settlements with various tax jurisdictions. While it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months, any change is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Following is a summary of the tax years open to examination by major tax jurisdiction:

U.S. Federal – 2006 and forward

U.S. State and Local – 2002 and forward

Austria – 2003 and forward

Canada – 2006 and forward

We also adjusted our deferred taxes in fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, resulting in an increase (decrease) of $291,000, $1,316,000, and $(2,057,000) in income tax expense, respectively.

Earnings before income taxes attributable to foreign sources for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 were as noted above. As of May 31, 2010, and based on the tax laws in effect at that time, it remains our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings, except for the foreign earnings of our TWB joint venture. Accordingly, where this election has been made, no deferred tax liability has been recorded for those foreign earnings. Undistributed earnings of our consolidated foreign subsidiaries at May 31, 2010 amounted to $244,517,000. If such earnings were not permanently reinvested, a deferred tax liability of $18,804,000 would have been required.

The components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of May 31 were as follows:

(in thousands)  2010   2009 

Deferred tax assets:

    

Accounts receivable

  $2,938    $4,511  

Inventories

   4,005     5,228  

Accrued expenses

   21,712     17,941  

Net operating loss carryforwards

   22,418     20,573  

Tax credit carryforwards

   2,127     2,423  

Stock-based compensation

   5,761     4,465  

Derivative contracts

   3,410     2,465  

Other

   58     754  
          

Total deferred tax assets

   62,429     58,360  

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

   (19,629   (14,729
          

Net deferred tax assets

   42,800     43,631  

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Property, plant and equipment

   (67,317   (77,454

Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (20,893   (15,802

Income taxes

   (661   (273

Other

   (582   (1,010
          

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (89,453   (94,539
          

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(46,653  $(50,908
          

The above amounts are classified in the consolidated balance sheets as of May 31 as follows:

(in thousands)  2010   2009 

Current assets:

    

Deferred income taxes

  $21,964    $24,868  

Other assets:

    

Deferred income taxes

   3,276     7,210  

Noncurrent liabilities:

    

Deferred income taxes

   (71,893   (82,986
          

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(46,653  $(50,908
          

At May 31, 2010, we had tax benefits for federal net operating loss carryforwards of $232,000 that expire from fiscal 2011 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2020. These net operating loss carryforwards are subject to utilization limitations. At May 31, 2010, we had tax benefits for state net operating loss carryforwards of $18,173,000 that expire from fiscal 2011 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2030 and state credit carryforwards

of $1,253,000 that expire from fiscal 2011 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2024. At May 31, 2010, we had tax benefits for foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $4,013,000 for income tax purposes that expire from fiscal 2011 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2029. At May 31, 2010, we had tax benefits for foreign tax credit carryforwards of $874,000 that expire in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019.

A valuation allowance of $19,629,000 has been recognized to offset the deferred tax assets related to the net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards and certain state tax credits. The valuation allowance includes $1,105,000 for federal, $15,593,000 for state and $2,931,000 for foreign. The majority of the federal valuation allowance relates to foreign tax credits with the remainder relating to the net operating loss carryforwards. The majority of the state valuation allowance relates to Metal Framing operations in various states and the Company’s Decatur Alabama facility, while the foreign valuation allowance relates to operations in the Czech Republic and China. Based on our history of profitability and taxable income projections, we have determined that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are otherwise realizable.

Note E – Employee Pension Plans

In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for employers’ accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Beginning with fiscal 2009, the Company adopted the measurement date provisions of this new accounting literature. The measurement date provisions require plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the date of the Company’s year-end financial statements. The Company previously measured its pension benefits obligation as of March 31 each year. The adoption of these measurement date provisions did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations for fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2009.

The new guidance also requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets in an employer’s defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. Companies are now required to disclose information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value of each major category of plan assets, the basis used to determine the overall expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, a description of the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value measurements of plan assets and significant concentrations of credit risk. The disclosure provisions of the new guidance are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the disclosure provisions of the new guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 required expanded disclosure in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but did not impact amounts within our consolidated financial statements.

We provide retirement benefits to employees mainly through defined contribution retirement plans. Eligible participants make pre-tax contributions based on elected percentages of eligible compensation, subject to annual addition and other limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and the various plans’ provisions. Company contributions consist of company matching contributions, annual or monthly employer contributions and discretionary contributions, based on individual plan provisions.

We also have one defined benefit plan, The Gerstenslager Company Bargaining Unit Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Gerstenslager Plan” or “defined benefit plan”). The Gerstenslager Plan is a non-contributory pension plan, which covers certain employees based on age and length of service. Our contributions comply with ERISA’s minimum funding requirements.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit plan and the defined contribution plans for the years ended May 31:

(in thousands)  2010   2009   2008 

Defined benefit plan:

      

Service cost

  $490    $615    $599  

Interest cost

   1,059     1,146     900  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,152     (3,774   496  

Net amortization and deferral

   (3,811   2,501     (1,538
               

Net periodic pension cost on defined benefit plan

   890     488     457  

Defined contribution plans

   8,817     8,455     11,641  
               

Total retirement plan cost

  $9,707    $8,943    $12,098  
               

The following actuarial assumptions were used for our defined benefit plan:

   2010  2009  2008 

To determine benefit obligation:

    

Discount rate

  6.00 7.45 6.82

To determine net periodic pension cost:

    

Discount rate

  7.45 6.92 6.14

Expected long-term rate of return

  8.00 8.00 8.00

Rate of compensation increase

  n/a   n/a   n/a  

To calculate the discount rate, we used the expected cash flows of the benefit payments and the Citigroup Pension Index. The Gerstenslager Plan’s expected long-term rate of return in fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was based on the actual historical returns adjusted for a change in the frequency of lump-sum settlements upon retirement. In determination of our obligation, we use the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which an employee is currently entitled, based on the employee’s expected date of separation or retirement.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets and the funded status for the Gerstenslager Plan during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 as of the respective measurement dates:

(in thousands)  May 31,
2010
   May 31,
2009
 

Change in benefit obligation

    

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

  $14,300    $14,329  

Service cost

   490     615  

Interest cost

   1,059     1,146  

Actuarial gain (loss)

   3,989     (1,390

Benefits paid

   (387   (400
          

Benefit obligation, end of year

  $19,451    $14,300  
          

Change in plan assets

    

Fair value, beginning of year

  $11,246    $15,420  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,152     (3,774

Company contributions

   982     -  

Benefits paid

   (387   (400
          

Fair value, end of year

  $14,993    $11,246  
          

Funded status

  $(4,458  $(3,054
          

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

    

Other liabilities

  $(4,458  $(3,054

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   6,023     4,527  

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of:

    

Net loss

   6,023     4,527  
          

Total

  $6,023    $4,527  
          

The following table shows other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI during the fiscal year ended May 31:

(in thousands)  2010   2009 

Net actuarial loss

  $1,762    $3,877  

Amortization of net loss

   (266   -  

Amortization of prior service cost

   -     (219
          

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

  $1,496    $3,658  
          

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)

  $2,386    $4,146  
          

The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit plan that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost over the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011 are $257,000 and $0, respectively.

Pension plan assets are required to be disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value is defined in “Note R – Fair Value.” The pension plan assets’ fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, a summary of the defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2010:

(in thousands)  Fair Value  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)

Investment:

        

Money Market Funds

  $275  $275  $-  $-

Bond Funds

   4,632   4,632   -   -

Equity Funds

   10,086   10,086   -   -
                

Totals

  $14,993  $14,993  $-  $-
                

Fair values for the money market, bond and equity funds held by the defined benefit plan were determined by quoted market prices.

Plan assets for the defined benefit plan consisted principally of the following as of the respective measurement dates:

   May 31,
2010
  May 31,
2009
 

Asset category

   

Equity securities

  67 61

Debt securities

  31 38

Other

  2 1
       

Total

  100 100
       

Equity securities include no employer stock. The investment policy and strategy for the defined benefit plan is: (i) long-term in nature with liquidity requirements that are anticipated to be minimal due to the projected normal retirement date of the average employee and the current average age of participants; (ii) to earn nominal returns, net of investment fees, equal to or in excess of the actuarial assumptions of the plan; and (iii) to include a strategic asset allocation of 60-80% equities, including international, and 20-40% fixed income investments. Employer contributions of $1,800,000 are expected to be made to the defined benefit plan during fiscal 2011. The following estimated future benefits, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid during the fiscal years noted:

(in thousands)   

2011

  $423

2012

   508

2013

   569

2014

   662

2015

   754

2016-2020

   6,241

Commercial law requires us to pay severance and service benefits to employees at our Austrian Pressure Cylinders location. Severance benefits must be paid to all employees hired before December 31, 2002. Employees hired after that date are covered under a governmental plan that requires us to pay benefits as a percentage of compensation (included in payroll tax withholdings). Service benefits are based on a percentage of compensation and years of service. The accrued liability for these unfunded plans was $5,747,000 and $6,539,000 at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was included in other liabilities on the

consolidated balance sheets. Net periodic pension cost for these plans was $728,000, $694,000 and $587,000 for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. The assumed salary rate increase was 3.0%, 3.5% and 3.5% for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. The discount rate at May 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was 5.00%, 6.20% and 6.00%, respectively. This discount rate is based on a published corporate bond rate with a term approximating the estimated benefit payment cash flows and is consistent with European and Austrian regulations.

Note FI – Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Under our employee and non-employee director stock-based compensation plans, we may grant incentive or non-qualified stock options, restricted common shares and performance shares to employees and non-qualified stock options and restricted common shares to non-employee directors. A total of 16,749,000 Worthington22,749,000 of our common shares have been authorized for issuance in connection with the stock-based compensation plans in place at May 31, 2010.2011.

The stock options may be granted to purchase common shares at not less than 100% of fair market value on the date of the grant. All outstanding stock options are non-qualified stock options. The exercise price of all stock options granted has been set at 100% of the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. Generally, the stock options granted to employees vest and become exercisable at the rate of 20% per year beginning one year from the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. The non-qualifiedNon-qualified stock options granted to non-employee directors vest and become exercisable on the first to occurearlier of (a) the first anniversary of the date of grant andor (b) as tothe date on which the next annual meeting of shareholders is held following the date of grant for any stock option granted as of the date of an annual meeting of shareholders of Worthington Industries, Inc., the date on which the next annual meeting of shareholders is held following the date of grant. Stock options can be exercised through net-settlement, at the election of the option holder.

In addition to the stock options, previously discussed, we have awarded performancerestricted shares to certain key employees that are contingent (i.e., vest) upon achieving corporate targets for cumulative corporate economic value added, earnings per share growth and, in the case of business unit executives, business unit operating income targets for the three-year periods ending May 31, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2012.2013. These performancerestricted share awards will be paid, to the extent earned, in common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. in the fiscal quarter following the end of the applicable three-year performance period. The restrictedRestricted shares granted to non-employee directors are valued at the closing market price of common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. on the date of the grant. TheThese restricted shares vest under the same parameters applicable to non-employee director stock options discussed above.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

U.S. GAAP requires that all share-based awards, including grants of stock options, be recorded as expense in the statement of earnings based on their grant-date fair values. In adopting the most recent U.S. GAAP provisions, we selected the modified prospective transition method. This method requires that compensation expense be recorded prospectively over the remaining vesting period of the stock options on a straight-line basis using the fair value of the stock options on the date of grant.

value. We calculate the fair value of theour

non-qualified stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and certain assumptions. The computation of fair values for all stock options useincorporates the following assumptions: The expected volatility is based(based on the historical volatility of theour common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc., and theshares); risk-free interest rate is based(based on the United States Treasury strip rate for the expected term of the stock options. Theoptions); expected term was developed using the(based on historical exercise experience. Theexperience); dividend yield is based(based on annualized current dividendsdividends); and an average quoted price of Worthington Industries, Inc.our common shares over the preceding annual period.

The table below sets forth the non-qualified stock options granted during each of the last three fiscal years ended May 31. For each grant, the optionexercise price was equal to the closing market price of the underlying common shares at each respective grant date. The fair values of these stock options were based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, calculated at the respective grant dates. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these stock options, which is after an estimate forof forfeitures, will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting periodperiods of the stock options.

 

  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Granted (in thousands)

   993   606   1,849   2,437     993     606  

Weighted average price, per share

  $ 13.36  $ 18.75  $ 21.34

Weighted average exercise price, per share

  $12.27    $13.36    $18.75  

Weighted average grant date fair value, per share

  $4.85  $5.57  $6.24  $4.88    $4.85    $5.57  

Pre-tax stock-based compensation (in thousands)

  $3,968  $2,734  $9,346  $9,715    $3,968    $2,734  

The weighted average fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

  2010 2009 2008   2011 2010 2009 

Assumptions used:

        

Dividend yield

  3.10 3.40 3.28   2.80  3.10  3.40

Expected volatility

  47.90 35.10 35.05   53.80  47.90  35.10

Risk-free interest rate

  2.90 3.50 3.96   2.10  2.90  3.50

Expected life (years)

  6.0   6.0   6.5     6.0    6.0    6.0  

The following tables summarize our activities in respect of stock optionsoption activity for the years ended May 31:

 

   2010  2009  2008
(in thousands, except per share)  Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Price
  Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Price
  Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Price

Outstanding, beginning of year

  5,750   $18.16  5,958   $17.84  5,241   $16.33

Granted

  993    13.36  606    18.75  1,849    21.34

Exercised

  (227  12.75  (318  13.55  (840  15.72

Expired

  -    -  (200  14.46  (16  18.61

Forfeited

  (344  16.69  (296  20.08  (276  18.99
               

Outstanding, end of year

  6,172    17.67  5,750    18.16  5,958    17.84
               

Exercisable at end of year

  3,631    17.79  3,185    16.83  2,714    15.37
               

   Number of
Stock Options

(in thousands)
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)

May 31, 2010

      

Outstanding

  6,172  5.89  $2,671

Exercisable

  3,631  4.41   1,268

May 31, 2009

      

Outstanding

  5,750  6.10  $12,663

Exercisable

  3,185  4.63   10,551

May 31, 2008

      

Outstanding

  5,958  6.47  $15,116

Exercisable

  2,714  4.34   12,474
   2011   2010   2009 
(in thousands, except per share)  Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

Outstanding, beginning of year

   6,172   $17.67     5,750   $18.16     5,958   $17.84  

Granted

   2,437    12.27     993    13.36     606    18.75  

Exercised

   (422  12.96     (227  12.75     (318  13.55  

Expired

   -    -     -    -     (200  14.46  

Forfeited

   (335  16.00     (344  16.69     (296  20.08  
                  

Outstanding, end of year

   7,852    16.29     6,172    17.67     5,750    18.16  
                  

Exercisable at end of year

   3,917    18.24     3,631    17.79     3,185    16.83  
                  

   Number of
Stock Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(in  thousands)
 

May 31, 2011

      

Outstanding

   7,852     6.30    $43,876  

Exercisable

   3,917     4.27     14,312  

May 31, 2010

      

Outstanding

   6,172     5.89    $2,671  

Exercisable

   3,631     4.41     1,268  

May 31, 2009

      

Outstanding

   5,750     6.10    $12,663  

Exercisable

   3,185     4.63     10,551  

During fiscal 2010,2011, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $786,000.$2,451,000. The total amount of cash received from employees exercisingthe exercise of stock options was $1,554,000$4,827,000 during fiscal 2010,2011, and the related netexcess tax benefit realized from the exercise of these stock options was $165,000 during the same period.$674,000.

The following table summarizes information about non-vested stock option awards for the year ended May 31, 2010:2011:

 

  Number of
Stock Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value
Per Share
  Number of
Stock Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value
Per Share
 

Non-vested, beginning of year

  2,565    $5.59   2,541    $5.47  

Granted

  993     4.85   2,437     4.88  

Vested

  (673   5.91   (708   5.44  

Forfeited

  (344   3.95   (335   5.16  
            

Non-vested, end of year

  2,541    $5.47   3,935    $5.14  
            

Restricted Common Shares

The table below sets forth the restricted common shares we granted during each of the last three fiscal years ended May 31. The fair values of these restricted common shares were equal to the closing market prices of the underlying common shares at their respective grant dates. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these restricted common shares will be recognized on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods.

 

  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

Granted

   21,750   22,850   11,150   26,100     21,750     22,850  

Weighted average grant date fair value, per share

  $13.90  $15.95  $22.95  $15.33    $13.90    $15.95  

Pre-tax stock-based compensation (in thousands)

  $302  $364  $256  $400    $302    $364  

The calculatedWe recognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for the stock optionoptions and restricted share awards above of $6,173,000 ($4,163,000 after-tax), $4,570,000 ($2,826,000 after-tax) for fiscal 2010,and $5,767,000 ($3,777,000 after-tax) forduring fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, and $4,173,000 ($2,898,000 after-tax) for fiscal 2008respectively. This expense was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense.within SG&A expense to correspond with the same line item as the majority of the cash compensation paid to employees. At May 31, 2010,2011, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards was $9,846,000,$13,850,000, which will be expensed over the next five fiscal years.

Note GJContingent LiabilitiesEmployee Pension Plans

We provide retirement benefits to employees mainly through defined contribution retirement plans. Eligible participants make pre-tax contributions based on elected percentages of eligible compensation, subject to annual addition and Commitmentsother limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and the various plans’ provisions. Company contributions consist of company matching contributions, annual or monthly employer contributions and discretionary contributions, based on individual plan provisions.

We also have one defined benefit plan, The Gerstenslager Company Bargaining Unit Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Gerstenslager Plan” or “defined benefit plan”). The Gerstenslager Plan is a non-contributory pension plan, which covers certain employees based on age and length of service. Our contributions have complied with ERISA’s minimum funding requirements. Effective May 9, 2011, in connection with the formation of the ArtiFlex joint venture, the Gerstenslager Plan was frozen, which qualified as a curtailment under the applicable accounting guidance. We did not recognize a gain or loss in connection with the curtailment of the Gerstenslager Plan. Refer to “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information regarding the formation of ArtiFlex.

The Company has been involved in a dispute with a customer, Irwin Industrial Tool Company (d/b/a BernzOmatic), a subsidiaryfollowing table summarizes the components of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (“BernzOmatic”), relating to a three-year supply contract (the “Contract”) that took effect January 1, 2006,net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit plan and which the Company terminated effective March 1, 2007. defined contribution plans for the years ended May 31:

(in thousands)  2011   2010   2009 

Defined benefit plan:

      

Service cost

  $575    $490    $615  

Interest cost

   1,140     1,059     1,146  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,921     3,152     (3,774

Net amortization and deferral

   (4,825   (3,811   2,501  
               

Net periodic pension cost on defined benefit plan

   811     890     488  

Defined contribution plans

   9,870     8,817     8,455  
               

Total retirement plan cost

  $10,681    $9,707    $8,943  
               

The dispute relates primarily tofollowing actuarial assumptions were used for our defined benefit plan:

   2011  2010  2009 

To determine benefit obligation:

    

Discount rate

   5.60  6.00  7.45

To determine net periodic pension cost:

    

Discount rate

   6.00  7.45  6.92

Expected long-term rate of return

   8.00  8.00  8.00

Rate of compensation increase

   n/a    n/a    n/a  

To calculate the Company’s early terminationdiscount rate, we used the expected cash flows of the Contract as a result of certain actions of BernzOmatic which the Company believed breached the Contract,benefit payments and the resulting price increases chargedCitigroup Pension Index. The Gerstenslager Plan’s expected long-term rate of return in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 was based on the actual historical returns adjusted for a change in the frequency of lump-sum settlements upon retirement. In determining our benefit obligation, we use the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to BernzOmatic after such early termination. As required by U.S. GAAP,which each eligible employee is currently entitled, based on the Company deferred $9,304,000employee’s expected date of revenue relating to cash receivedseparation or retirement.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets and the funded status for the price increases, which effectively created a reserve in that amount relating to this dispute.

The dispute was litigated in Federal District Court in Charlotte, North Carolina. On February 26,Gerstenslager Plan during fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 the jury awarded contract damages relating to the price increases and other items to BernzOmatic of approximately $13,002,000, which was $3,698,000 in excessas of the revenue recognition reserve. The Company recorded this $3,698,000 pre-tax charge in net earnings, within selling, general and administrative expense, during fiscal 2010. The jury award has been stayed pending appeal.

respective measurement dates:

In May 2010, the Company filed motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial on certain matters. BernzOmatic also filed motions which included a request for pre-judgment interest of $1,828,000 and attorneys fees of $1,242,000 related to certain claims. The trial judge is expected to rule on these matters in September 2010. Based on the Company’s assessments of probability and estimates of related amounts involved in this matter, no adjustment to the $13,002,000 in related reserves has been recorded.

(in thousands)  May 31,
2011
   May 31,
2010
 

Change in benefit obligation

    

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

  $19,451    $14,300  

Service cost

   575     490  

Interest cost

   1,140     1,059  

Actuarial gain

   1,061     3,989  

Benefits paid

   (413   (387
          

Benefit obligation, end of year

  $21,814    $19,451  
          

Change in plan assets

    

Fair value, beginning of year

  $14,993    $11,246  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,921     3,152  

Company contributions

   1,307     982  

Benefits paid

   (413   (387
          

Fair value, end of year

  $19,808    $14,993  
          

Funded status

  $(2,006  $(4,458
          

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

    

Other liabilities

  $(2,006  $(4,458

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   4,067     6,023  

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

    

Net loss

   4,067     6,023  
          

Total

  $4,067    $6,023  
          

The Company believesfollowing table shows other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI during the fiscal year ended May 31:

(in thousands)  2011   2010 

Net actuarial gain (loss)

  $1,606    $(1,762

Amortization of prior service cost

   350     266  
          

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

 ��$1,956    $(1,496
          

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)

  $1,145    $(2,386
          

The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit plan that it has numerous grounds to appeal the jury’s verdict, and intends to pursue such an appeal unless its post-trial motions are favorably resolved by the trial court.

We are defendants in certain other legal actions. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these actions, which is not clearly determinable at the present time, would not significantly affect our consolidated financial position or future results of operations. We believe that environmental issues will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or future results of operations.

To secure access to a facility used to regenerate acid used in certain Steel Processing locations, we have enteredbe amortized from AOCI into unconditional purchase obligations with a third party under which three of our Steel Processing facilities deliver their spent acid for processing annually throughnet periodic pension cost over the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. In addition, we2012 are $171,500 and $0, respectively.

Pension plan assets are required to pay for freightbe disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value is defined in “Note P – Fair Value.” The pension plan assets’ fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and utilities used in regeneratingminimize the spent acid. Total net payments to this third party were $4,270,000, $4,948,000, and $5,359,000 for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. use of unobservable inputs.

The aggregate amountfollowing table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, a summary of required future paymentsthe defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2010, was as follows2011:

(in thousands)  Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Investment:

        

Money Market Funds

  $349    $349    $  -    $  -  

Bond Funds

   5,579     5,579     -     -  

Equity Funds

   13,880     13,880     -     -  
                    

Totals

  $19,808    $19,808    $-    $-  
                    

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy a summary of the defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2010:

(in thousands)  Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 

Investment:

        

Money Market Funds

  $275    $275    $  -    $  -  

Bond Funds

   4,632     4,632     -     -  

Equity Funds

   10,086     10,086     -     -  
                    

Totals

  $14,993    $14,993    $-    $-  
                    

Fair values of the money market, bond and equity funds held by the defined benefit plan were determined by quoted market prices.

Plan assets for the next fivedefined benefit plan consisted principally of the following as of the respective measurement dates:

   May 31,
2011
  May 31,
2010
 

Asset category

   

Equity securities

   70  67

Debt securities

   28  31

Other

   2  2
         

Total

   100  100
         

Equity securities include no employer stock. The investment policy and strategy for the defined benefit plan is: (i) long-term in nature with liquidity requirements that are anticipated to be minimal due to the projected normal retirement date of the average employee and the current average age of participants; (ii) to earn nominal returns, net of investment fees, equal to or in excess of the actuarial assumptions of the plan; and (iii) to include a strategic asset allocation of 60-80% equities, including international, and 20-40% fixed income investments. Employer contributions of $1,600,000 are expected to be made to the defined benefit plan during fiscal 2012. The following estimated future benefits, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid during the fiscal years and thereafter:noted:

 

(in thousands)       

2011

  $2,367

2012

   2,367  $421  

2013

   2,367   494  

2014

   2,367   550  

2015

   2,367   645  

Thereafter

   9,468
   

Total

  $21,303
   

2016

   738  

2017-2021

   6,051  

We may terminateCommercial law requires us to pay severance and service benefits to employees at our Austrian Pressure Cylinders location. Severance benefits must be paid to all employees hired before December 31, 2002. Employees hired after that date are covered under a governmental plan that requires us to pay benefits as a percentage of compensation (included in payroll tax withholdings). Service benefits are based on a percentage of compensation and years of service. The accrued liability for these unfunded plans was $6,667,000 and $5,747,000 at May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and was included in other liabilities on the unconditional purchase obligationsconsolidated balance sheets. Net periodic pension cost for these plans was $506,000, $728,000 and $694,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. The assumed salary rate increase was 3.0%, 3.0% and 3.5% for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. The discount rate at any time by purchasing this facility at its then fair market value.May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was 5.50%, 5.00% and 6.20%, respectively. Each discount rate was based on a published corporate bond rate with a term approximating the estimated benefit payment cash flows and is consistent with European and Austrian regulations.

Note HK – Income Taxes

Earnings (loss) before income taxes for the years ended May 31 include the following components:

(in thousands)  2011   2010   2009 

United States based operations

  $166,137    $73,122    $(170,405

Non - United States based operations

   16,393     5,035     28,966  
               

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

   182,530     78,157     (141,439
               

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests*

   8,968     6,266     4,529  
               

Earnings (loss) before income taxes attributable to controlling interest

  $173,562    $71,891    $(145,968
               

*

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are not taxable to Worthington.

Significant components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31 were as follows:

(in thousands)  2011   2010   2009 

Current:

      

Federal

  $47,698    $30,080    $(21,609

State and local

   1,246     1,333     3,146  

Foreign

   2,070     1,347     6,188  
               
   51,014     32,760     (12,275

Deferred:

      

Federal

   3,950     (6,804   (19,393

State

   3,599     1,399     (4,359

Foreign

   (67   (705   (1,727
               
   7,482     (6,110   (25,479
               
  $58,496    $26,650    $(37,754
               

Tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were credited to additional paid-in capital were $835,000, $6,000, and $433,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. Tax benefits (expenses) related to defined benefit pension liability that were credited to (deducted from) other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) were ($760,000), $1,163,000, and $14,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. Tax benefits (expenses) related to cash flow hedges that were credited to (deducted from) OCI were $563,000, $854,000, and $3,187,000 for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.

A reconciliation of the 35% federal statutory tax rate to total tax provision (benefit) follows:

   2011  2010  2009 

Federal statutory rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

   1.8    (1.5  2.3  

Change in state and local valuation allowances

   1.0    5.0    (0.7

Change in income tax accruals for resolution of tax audits and change in estimate of deferred tax

   0.2    1.6    (0.1

Non-U.S. income taxes at other than 35%

   (2.2  (1.6  3.9  

Qualified production activities deduction

   (1.9  (2.1  -  

Goodwill impairment non-deductible

   -    -    (13.9

Other

   (0.2  0.7    (0.6
             

Effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest

   33.7  37.1  25.9
             

The above effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest excludes any impact from the inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of earnings. The effective tax rates upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests were 32.0%, 34.1% and 26.7% for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. The change in effective income tax rates, upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests, is primarily a result of our Spartan consolidated joint venture. The earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Spartan do not generate tax expense to Worthington since the investors in Spartan are taxed directly based on the earnings attributable to them.

Under applicable accounting guidance, a tax benefit may be recognized from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax benefits recognized in our financial statements from such a position were measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits were $5,381,000, $5,933,000, and $3,897,000 as of May 31, 2011, May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was $3,361,000 as of May 31, 2011. Unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken, or expected to be taken in a tax return, and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes. Accrued amounts of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as part of income tax expense within our consolidated statements of earnings. As of May 31, 2011, May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we had accrued liabilities of $1,184,000, $1,232,000 and $1,143,000, respectively, for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

A tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits follows:

(in thousands)    

Balance at June 1, 2010

  $5,933  

Increases – tax positions taken in prior years

   584  

Decreases – tax positions taken in prior years

   (505

Increases – current tax positions

   745  

Settlements

   (934

Lapse of statutes of limitations

   (442
     

Balance at May 31, 2011

  $5,381  
     

Approximately $620,000 of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to be settled in the next twelve months due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in various tax jurisdictions and as a result of expected settlements with various tax jurisdictions. While it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months, any change is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Following is a summary of the tax years open to examination by major tax jurisdiction:

U.S. Federal – 2007 and forward

U.S. State and Local – 2003 and forward

Austria – 2004 and forward

Canada – 2007 and forward

Earnings before income taxes attributable to foreign sources for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 were as noted above. As of May 31, 2011, and based on the tax laws in effect at that time, it remains our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings, except for the foreign earnings of our TWB joint venture. Accordingly, no deferred tax liability has been recorded for those foreign earnings. Undistributed earnings of our consolidated foreign subsidiaries at May 31, 2011 were approximately $265,000,000. If such earnings were not permanently reinvested, a deferred tax liability of approximately $23,000,000 would have been required.

The components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of May 31 were as follows:

(in thousands)  2011   2010 

Deferred tax assets:

    

Accounts receivable

  $1,870    $2,938  

Inventories

   5,932     4,005  

Accrued expenses

   29,227     21,712  

Net operating and capital loss carryforwards

   22,501     22,418  

Tax credit carryforwards

   1,265     2,127  

Stock-based compensation

   7,187     5,761  

Derivative contracts

   3,761     3,410  

Other

   7     58  
          

Total deferred tax assets

   71,750     62,429  

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

   (22,292   (19,629
          

Net deferred tax assets

   49,458     42,800  

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Property, plant and equipment

   (58,606   (67,317

Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (43,947   (20,893

Other

   (583   (1,243
          

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (103,136   (89,453
          

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(53,678  $(46,653
          

The above amounts are classified in the consolidated balance sheets as of May 31 as follows:

(in thousands)  2011   2010 

Current assets:

    

Deferred income taxes

  $28,297    $21,964  

Other assets:

    

Deferred income taxes

   2,006     3,276  

Noncurrent liabilities:

    

Deferred income taxes

   (83,981   (71,893
          

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(53,678  $(46,653
          

At May 31, 2011, we had tax benefits for federal net operating loss carryforwards of $205,000 that expire from fiscal 2012 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2020. These net operating loss carryforwards are subject to utilization limitations. At May 31, 2011, we had tax benefits for state net operating loss carryforwards of $18,184,000 that expire from fiscal 2012 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2031. At May 31, 2011, we had tax benefits for foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $2,728,000 for income tax purposes that expire from fiscal 2012 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2031. At May 31, 2011, we had a tax benefit for a foreign capital loss carryforward of $1,384,000 with no future expiration date. At May 31, 2011, we had tax benefits for foreign tax credit carryforwards of $1,265,000 that expire in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2021.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $22,292,000 is associated primarily with the net operating and capital loss carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards. The valuation allowance includes $1,470,000 for federal, $17,404,000 for state and $3,418,000 for foreign. The majority of the federal valuation allowance relates to foreign tax credits with the remainder relating to the net operating loss carryforwards. The majority of the state valuation allowance relates to Metal Framing operations in various states and our Decatur, Alabama facility, while the foreign valuation allowance relates to operations in China, Canada, and the Czech Republic. Based on our history of profitability and taxable income projections, we have determined that it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets are otherwise realizable.

Note L – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the years ended May 31:

(in thousands, except per share)  2011   2010   2009 

Numerator (basic & diluted):

      

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest –income (loss) available to common shareholders

  $115,066    $45,241    $(108,214

Denominator:

      

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest – weighted average common shares

   74,803     79,127     78,903  

Effect of dilutive securities

   606     16     -  
               

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest – adjusted weighted average common shares

   75,409     79,143     78,903  
               

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

  $1.54    $0.57    $(1.37

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

   1.53     0.57     (1.37

Stock options covering 3,620,287, 5,820,514 and 5,979,781 common shares for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for those periods, either because we incurred a net loss during the period or the exercise price of the stock options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

Note M – Segment Data

During the third quarter of fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010,2011, we made certain organizational changes that impactedimpacting the internal reporting and management structure of our previously reported Construction Services operating segment. This operating segment consisted of the Worthington Integrated Building Systems (“WIBS”) business unit, which included the Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs businesses.operating segments. As a result of continued challenges facing those businesses, the interaction between those businesses and other operations within the Company and other industry factors,these organizational changes, management responsibilities and internal reporting for these businesses were re-aligned and separated for those entities within WIBS. Operational strategies have also been modified for these businesses in order to reduce redundancy and competition withincombined into a single operating segment, the consolidated Company. While the compositionGlobal Group. The purpose of the Company’s reportable business segmentsGlobal Group is unchanged from this development (see description below),to identify and develop potential growth platforms by applying our core competencies in metals manufacturing and construction methods. The Global Group is reported in the level of aggregation within the Other“Other” category for segment reporting purposes, is impacted, as areit does not meet the identified reporting units usedapplicable aggregation criteria or materiality thresholds for testingseparate disclosure. Accordingly, these organizational changes did not impact the composition of potential goodwill impairment. Subsequent to this change, and as of May 31, 2010, the Other category, for purposes of reporting segment financial information, continues to include Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs. However, those operating units are no longer combined together as the Construction Services operating segment, but are each separate and distinct operating segments, as well as separate reporting units.

During the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010, prior to the separation of those businesses formerly comprising the Construction Services operating segment and as a result of many of the same factors leading to that change, as described above, we again tested the value of the goodwill balances in the then Construction Services operating segment, after having tested the long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment. See “Note N – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional details of that testing and the resulting impairments, which are included within the Other category in the tables below.our reportable business segments.

Our operations are managed principally on a products and services basis and include three reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Metal Framing.Framing, each of which is comprised of a similar group of products and services. Factors used to identify these reportable business segments include the nature of the products and services provided by each business, the management reporting structure, similarity of economic characteristics and certain quantitative measures, as prescribed by authoritative guidance. A discussion of each of theour three operating segments that qualify as a separate reportable business segment is outlined below.

Steel Processing:    The Steel Processing operating segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit, and includes Precision Specialty Metals, Inc., a specialty stainless processor located in Los Angeles, California, and Spartan, a consolidated joint venture which operates a cold-rolled hot dipped galvanizing line. Worthington Steel is an intermediate processor of flat-rolled steel and stainless steel. This operating segment’s processing capabilities include pickling; slitting; cold reducing; hot-dipped galvanizing; hydrogen

annealing; cutting-to-length; tension leveling; edging; non-metallic coating, including dry lubrication, acrylic and paint; and configured blanking. Worthington Steel sells to customers principally in the automotive, construction, lawn and garden, hardware, furniture, office equipment, electrical control, tubing, leisure and recreation, appliance, agricultural, HVAC, container and aerospace markets. Worthington Steel also toll processes steel for steel mills, large end-users, service centers and other processors. Toll processing is different from typical steel processing in that the mill, end-user or other party retains title to the steel and has the responsibility for selling the end product. Toll processing revenues were immaterial for all periods presented.

Pressure Cylinders:    The Pressure Cylinders operating segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit.unit and WNCL, a consolidated joint venture based in India that manufactures high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles as well as cylinders for compressed industrial gases. Worthington Cylinders produces a diversified line of pressure cylinders, including low-pressure liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) and refrigerant gas cylinders; high-pressure and industrial/specialty gas cylinders; airbrake tanks; and certain consumer products. The LPG cylinders are sold to manufacturers, distributors and mass merchandisers and are used to hold fuel for gas barbecue grills, recreational vehicle equipment, residential and light commercial heating systems, industrial forklifts, hand held torches and propane-fueled camping equipment. Refrigerant gas cylinders are sold primarily to major refrigerant gas producers and distributors and are used to hold refrigerant gases for commercial, residential and automotive air conditioning and refrigeration systems. High-pressure and industrial/specialty gas (steel and aluminum) cylinders, acetylene and composite cylinders are sold primarily to gas producers and distributors as containers for gases used in the following: cutting and welding metals; breathing (medical, diving and firefighting); semiconductor production; beverage delivery; and compressed natural gas systems. Worthington Cylinders also produces recovery tanks for refrigerant gases, air reservoirs for truck and trailer original equipment manufacturers and “Balloon Time®” helium kits, which include non-refillable cylinders.

Metal FramingFraming:    :    The Metal Framing operating segment consists of the Dietrich Metal Framing business unit, which designs and producesunit. As more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of Dietrich to a newly-formed joint venture, ClarkDietrich. We retained seven of the 13 metal framing componentsfacilities, which we continue to operate, on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. Following this brief transition period, these assets will be disposed of. The financial results and systems and related accessories foroperating performance of the commercial and residential construction marketsretained facilities will continue to be reported within the United States. Dietrich’s customers primarily consist of wholesale distributors, commercial and residential building contractors and mass merchandisers.our Metal Framing operating segment until their expected disposition in fiscal 2012. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, will continue to be reported within Metal Framing on a historical basis.

Other:    Included in the Other category are operating segments that do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria and materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure as reportable business segments, as well as other corporate-related entities. TheseThrough May 9, 2011, these operating segments are:included Automotive Body Panels, Steel Packaging, Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs.the Global Group. On May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels subsidiary, Gerstenslager, to the newly-formed joint venture, ArtiFlex, and resulting deconsolidation of the contributed net assets, we no longer maintain a separate Automotive Body Panels operating segment. Accordingly, subsequent to May 9, 2011, the operating segments comprising the Other category consist of Steel Packaging and the Global Group. Each of these operating segments is explained in more detail below.

We will continue to report the historical financial results and operating performance of our former Automotive Body Panels:    ThisPanels operating segment consists of the Gerstenslager business unit which provides services including stamping, blanking, assembly, painting, packaging, die management, warehousing, distribution management and other services to customers primarilyon a historical basis through May 9, 2011. This former operating segment has historically been reported in the automotive industry.“Other” category for segment reporting purposes, as it has not meet the applicable aggregation criteria or materiality thresholds for separate disclosure. Accordingly, this organizational change did not impact the composition of our reportable segments.

Steel Packaging:    This operating segment consists of Worthington Steelpac Systems, LLC (“Steelpac”), which designs and manufactures reusable custom platforms, racks and pallets made of steel for supporting, protecting and handling products throughout the shipping process for customers in industries such as automotive, lawn and garden and recreational vehicles.

Mid-Rise Construction:Global Group:    This operating segment consists of Worthington Mid-Rise Construction, Inc., which designs, supplies and builds mid-rise light-gauge steel framed commercial structures and multi-family housing units.

Military Construction:    This operating segment consists ofunits; Worthington Military Construction, Inc., which is involved in the supply and construction of metal framing products for, and in the framing of, single family housing, with a focus on military housing.

Commercial Stairs:    This operating segment consists ofhousing; and Worthington Stairs, LLC, a manufacturer of pre-engineered steel egress stair solutions. Also included within the Global Group are the newly-formed Global Development Group and Worthington Energy Group business units. The purpose of the Global Group is to provide new organic growth platforms by applying our core competencies in markets that have high growth opportunities.

The accounting policies of the reportable business segments and other operating segments are described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” We evaluate operating segment performance based on operating income (loss). Inter-segment sales are not material.

Summarized financial information for our reportable business segments as of, and for the indicated years ended, May 31, is shown in the following table.table:

 

(in thousands)  2010   2009   2008   2011   2010   2009 

Net sales

            

Steel Processing

  $988,950    $1,183,013    $1,463,202    $1,405,492    $988,950    $1,183,013  

Pressure Cylinders

   467,572     537,373     578,808     591,945     467,572     537,373  

Metal Framing

   330,578     661,024     788,788     249,543     330,578     661,024  

Other

   155,934     249,857     236,363     195,644     155,934     249,857  
                        

Total

  $1,943,034    $2,631,267    $3,067,161  

Total net sales

  $2,442,624    $1,943,034    $2,631,267  
                        

Operating income (loss)

            

Steel Processing

  $51,353    $(68,149  $55,799    $77,671    $51,353    $(68,149

Pressure Cylinders

   30,056     61,175     70,004     48,954     30,056     61,175  

Metal Framing

   (10,186   (142,598   (16,215   (7,530   (10,186   (142,598

Other

   (49,260   (25,724   (3,554   5,261     (49,260   (25,724
                        

Total

  $21,963    $(175,296  $106,034  

Total operating income (loss)

  $124,356    $21,963    $(175,296
                        

Depreciation and amortization

            

Steel Processing

  $26,290    $25,944    $26,779    $27,632    $26,290    $25,944  

Pressure Cylinders

   12,936     10,680     10,454     14,734     12,936     10,680  

Metal Framing

   14,591     15,683     16,907     9,623     14,591     15,683  

Other

   10,836     11,766     9,273     9,069     10,836     11,766  
                        

Total

  $64,653    $64,073    $63,413  

Total depreciation and amortization

  $61,058    $64,653    $64,073  
                        

Pre-tax impairment of long-lived assets and restructuring and other expense (income)

            

Steel Processing

  $(488  $3,917    $1,096    $(303  $(488  $3,917  

Pressure Cylinders

   309     1,045     103     -     309     1,045  

Metal Framing

   3,892     110,536     8,979     1,387     3,892     110,536  

Other

   35,939     24,486     7,933     5,955     35,939     24,486  
                        

Total

  $39,652    $139,984    $18,111  

Total pre-tax impairment of long-lived assets and restructuring and other expense

  $7,039    $39,652    $139,984  
            

Joint venture transactions

      

Steel Processing

  $-    $-    $-  

Pressure Cylinders

   -     -     -  

Metal Framing

   (1,810   -     -  

Other

   (8,626   -     -  
            

Total joint venture transactions

  $(10,436  $-    $-  
                        

Total assets

            

Steel Processing

  $674,953    $469,701    $942,885    $742,838    $674,953    $469,701  

Pressure Cylinders

   393,639     355,717     437,159     481,361     393,639     355,717  

Metal Framing

   203,072     226,285     527,446     37,069     203,072     226,285  

Other

   248,683     312,126     80,541     405,981     248,683     312,126  
                        

Total

  $1,520,347    $1,363,829    $1,988,031  

Total assets

  $1,667,249    $1,520,347    $1,363,829  
                        

Capital expenditures

      

Steel Processing

  $5,910    $24,975    $7,157  

Pressure Cylinders

   19,425     26,618     16,540  

Metal Framing

   2,614     4,467     6,770  

Other

   6,370     8,094     17,053  
            

Total

  $34,319    $64,154    $47,520  
            

Net sales by geographic region for the years ended May 31 are shown in the following table:

 

(in thousands)  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

United States

  $1,832,286  $2,395,430  $2,786,679  $2,256,579    $1,832,286    $2,395,430  

Canada

   39,751   66,467   74,623   32,891     39,751     66,467  

Europe

   70,997   169,370   205,859   116,071     70,997     169,370  

Other

   37,083     -     -  
                     

Total

  $1,943,034  $2,631,267  $3,067,161  $2,442,624    $1,943,034    $2,631,267  
                     

Property, plant and equipment, net, by geographic region as of May 31 is shown in the following table:

 

(in thousands)  2010  2009  2008  2011   2010   2009 

United States

  $459,174  $472,078  $505,988  $337,894    $459,174    $472,078  

Canada

   1,055   2,567   8,025   1,368     1,055     2,567  

Europe

   45,934   46,860   35,931   49,627     45,934     46,860  

Other

   16,445     -     -  
                     

Total

  $506,163  $521,505  $549,944  $405,334    $506,163    $521,505  
                     

Note INRelated Party TransactionsAcquisitions

We purchase from, and sell to, affiliated companies certain raw materials and services at prevailing market prices. Net sales to affiliated companies for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 totaled $9,336,000, $18,550,000, and $25,962,000, respectively. Purchases from affiliated companies for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 totaled $4,701,000, $2,799,000, and $10,680,000, respectively. Accounts receivable from affiliated companies were $4,377,000, and $3,301,000 at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Accounts payable to affiliated companies were $3,048,000 and $155,000 at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note J – Investments in Unconsolidated AffiliatesMISA Metals, Inc.

Our investments in affiliated companies that are not controlled, either through majority ownership or otherwise, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. At May 31, 2010, these equity investments and the percentage interests owned consisted of: DMFCWBS, LLC (the “Clark JV”) (50%), LEFCO Worthington, LLC (49%), Samuel Steel Pickling Company (31%), Serviacero Planos, S.A. de C.V. (50%), TWB Company, L.L.C. (45%), Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”) (50%) and Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”) (51%). WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

As further discussed in “Note P – Acquisitions,” Worthington acquired certain assets from Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Gibraltar”) on February 1, 2010. Included in the assets acquired was a 31.25% partnership interest in Samuel Steel Pickling Company, a joint venture which operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and one in Cleveland, Ohio. The joint venture is accounted for using the equity method of accounting, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the joint venture.

On August 12, 2009, we joined with ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc., to create the Clark JV. We contributed certain intangible assets and committed to pay a portion of certain costs and expenses in return for 50% of the equity units and voting power of the joint venture. The purpose of the Clark JV is to develop, test and obtain approvals for metal framing stud designs, as well as to develop, own and license intellectual property related to such designs. The Clark JV does not manufacture or sell any products, but will license its designs to its members and possibly to third parties. The Clark JV is accounted for using the equity method of accounting, as both parties have equal voting rights and control.

During May 2009, we sold our 50% equity interest in Accelerated Building Technologies, LLC to NOVA Chemicals Corporation, the other member of the joint venture. The sales price and loss on the transaction were immaterial.

During January 2009, we sold our 60% equity interest in Aegis Metal Framing, LLC for approximately $24,000,000 to MiTek Industries, Inc., the other member of the joint venture. This resulted in a gain of $8,331,000.

During October 2008, we sold our 49% equity interest in Canessa Worthington Slovakia s.r.o. for approximately $3,700,000 to the Magnetto Group, the other member of the joint venture. The gain on the transaction was immaterial.

On October 1, 2008, we expanded and modified WSP, our joint venture with United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”). U.S. Steel contributed ProCoil Company, L.L.C., its steel processing facility in Canton, Michigan, and we contributed $2,500,000 of cash and Worthington Steel Taylor, our steel processing subsidiary in Taylor, Michigan, which had a book value of $13,851,000.

On June 2, 2008, we made an additional capital contribution of $392,000 to Viking & Worthington Steel Enterprise, LLC (“VWSE”). The other member in the joint venture did not make its contribution as required by the operating agreement. As a result, we now own 100% of VWSE, which has been fully consolidated in our financial statements since the beginning of fiscal 2009. VWSE has closed its manufacturing operations and its business is being handled by the consolidated operations of the Steel Processing operating segment.

On March 1, 2008, our TWB joint venture2011, we acquired, ThyssenKrupp Tailored Blanks S.A. de C.V.,as partial consideration for the Mexican laser welding subsidiary of ThyssenKrupp Steel North America, Inc. (“ThyssenKrupp”), to expand TWB’s presence in Mexico. The acquisition was made through a contribution of capital by ThyssenKrupp,our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich, the net assets of certain MMI steel processing locations (the “MMI acquisition”). The equipment and as a result, ThyssenKrupp owns 55%processing capabilities obtained in connection with the MMI acquisition complement our existing steel processing business and expand our ability to service the needs of TWBnew and Worthington owns 45%. This resultedexisting customers in a dilution gain of $1,944,000 (net of taxes of $1,031,000) and was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

On October 25, 2007, we acquired a 49% interest in crate and pallet maker LEFCO Industries, LLC, a minority business enterprise. The resulting joint venture, called LEFCO Worthington, LLC, offers engineered wooden crates, specialty pallets and steel rack systems for a variety of industries.

On September 17, 2007, Worthington acquired a 50% interest in Serviacero Planos of central Mexico. This joint venture is known as Serviacero Planos, S.A de C.V. The purchase pricethe southern region of the investment was $41,767,000.United States. The investment exceeded the book value of the underlying equity inacquired net assets by $22,258,000. Of this excess amount, $12,828,000 was allocated based on the fair valuebecame part of those underlying net assets and will be amortized to equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates over the remaining useful lives of those assets, with the remainder of $9,430,000 allocated to goodwill.

We received distributions from unconsolidated affiliates totaling $52,970,000, $80,580,000 and $58,920,000 in fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. We have received cumulative distributions from WAVE in excess of our investment balance, which resulted in an amount within other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets of $18,385,000 and $18,240,000 at May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The accounting treatment of excess distributions for a general partnership is to reclassify the negative balance to the liability section of the balance sheet, which was done during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. This liability is included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at May 31, 2010 and 2009. We will continue to record equity in net income from WAVE as a debit to the investment account, and when it becomes positive, it will again be shown as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets. If it becomes obvious that any excess distribution may not be returned (upon joint venture liquidation or for other reasons), we will record any balance in the liability as immediate income or gain.

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received on the investments are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows in operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of cumulative equity in earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and included in our consolidated statements of cash flows as an investing cash flow. During fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the Company received distributions from an unconsolidated joint venture in excess of the Company’s cumulative equity in the earnings of that joint venture. These cash flows of $375,000 and $23,500,000, respectively, were included in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows due to the nature of the distributions as returns of investment, rather than returns on investment.

Combined financial information for affiliated companies accounted for using the equity method as of, and for the years ended, May 31, was as follows:

(in thousands)  2010  2009  2008

Cash

  $75,762  $72,103  $79,538

Other current assets

   199,288   165,615   225,469

Noncurrent assets

   170,787   167,779   194,169
            

Total assets

  $445,837  $405,497  $499,176
            

Current liabilities

  $85,514  $57,995  $124,258

Long-term debt

   150,212   150,596   101,411

Other noncurrent liabilities

   10,244   24,373   34,394

Equity

   199,867   172,533   239,113
            

Total liabilities and equity

  $445,837  $405,497  $499,176
            

Net sales

  $708,779  $719,635  $745,437

Gross margin

   189,622   175,832   206,927

Depreciation and amortization

   10,690   14,044   13,056

Interest expense

   1,482   3,708   7,575

Income tax expense

   5,625   7,101   8,974

Net earnings

   127,837   102,071   134,925

At May 31, 2010, $17,386,000 of the Company’s consolidated retained earnings represented undistributed earnings, net of tax, of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Note K – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the years ended May 31:

(in thousands, except per share)  2010  2009   2008

Numerator (basic & diluted):

      

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest – income (loss) available to common shareholders

  $45,241  $(108,214  $107,077

Denominator:

      

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest – weighted average common shares

   79,127   78,903     81,232

Effect of dilutive securities

   16   -     666
             

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest – adjusted weighted average common shares

   79,143   78,903     81,898
             

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

  $0.57  $(1.37  $1.32

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

   0.57   (1.37   1.31

Stock options covering 5,820,514, 5,979,781 and 1,346,625 common shares for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for those periods.

Note L – Operating Leases

We lease certain property and equipment from third parties under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Rent expense under operating leases was $16,681,000, $15,467,000 and $14,188,000 in fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. Future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases having an initial or remaining term in excess of one year at May 31, 2010, were as follows:

(in thousands)   

2011

  $10,662

2012

   8,727

2013

   7,368

2014

   4,628

2015

   3,240

Thereafter

   5,042
    

Total

  $39,667
    

Note M – Restructuring

In fiscal 2008, we initiated a Transformation Plan (the “Transformation Plan”) with the overall goal to improve the Company’s sustainable earnings potential, asset utilization and operational performance. The Transformation Plan focuses on cost reduction, margin expansion and organizational capability improvements and, in the process, seeks to drive excellence in three core competencies: sales; operations; and supply chain management. The Transformation Plan is comprehensive in scope and includes aggressive diagnostic and implementation phases in the Steel Processing and Metal Framing segments. As a result of the

Transformation Plan and its related efforts, we have incurred certain asset impairments which have been included within restructuring and other expense in the consolidated statements of earnings. Asset impairment charges which are not a result of these efforts have been included within impairment of long-lived assets in the consolidated statements of earnings.

To date, the following have taken place:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, an initial headcount reduction plan was put into place, utilizing a combination of voluntary retirement and severance packages. A total of 63 individuals, across the Company, were impacted.

On September 25, 2007, we announced the closure or downsizing of five locations in our Metal Framing segment. These actions were completed as of May 31, 2008 and included headcount reductions of approximately 165.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Metal Framing corporate offices were moved from Pittsburgh and Blairsville, Pennsylvania, to Columbus, Ohio. Headcount was reduced by 33.

On October 23, 2008, we announced the closure of two facilities, one Steel Processing (Louisville, Kentucky) and one Metal Framing (Renton, Washington), as well as headcount reductions of 282. The Louisville facility was closed on February 28, 2009, and the Renton facility closed on December 31, 2008. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the remaining assets of the Louisville facility were sold, resulting in a gain of $1,003,000. That gain has been classified within restructuring and other expense in the consolidated statements of earnings, and is included in the gain on dispositions of $4,336,000 noted in the table below.

On December 5, 2008, we announced the closure and/or suspension of operations at three Metal Framing facilities and headcount reductions in Steel Processing of 186. The Lunenburg, Massachusetts, facility closed and operations were suspended in Miami, Florida, and Phoenix, Arizona, on February 28, 2009. The associated headcount impact for Metal Framing was a reduction of 125.

The decision was made during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to close the Joliet, Illinois, Metal Framing facility. A majority of the roll forming operation located at that facility was moved to the Hammond, Indiana, facility during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Approximately $1,717,000 of impairment was recognized during fiscal 2010 related to this closure.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, additional headcount reductions took place across locations within the Metal Framing, Military Construction and Mid-Rise Construction operating segments. A total of 113 individuals were impacted.

In February 2010, the Rock Hill, South Carolina, Steel Processing facility met the held for sale classification criteria under applicable accounting guidance. The $1,165,000 carrying value of that facility, which was determined to be below fair value, was included within assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010.

In May 2010, certain of the Buffalo, New York, Steel Processing equipment met the held for sale classification criteria under applicable accounting guidance. After an immaterial adjustment to fair value, the $1,315,000 carrying value of that equipment was included within assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2010.

We retained a consulting firm to assist in the development and implementation of the Transformation Plan. The services provided by this firm included assistance through diagnostic tools, performance improvement technologies, project management techniques, benchmarking information and insights that directly related to the Transformation Plan. Accordingly, the firm’s fees were included in restructuring charges. Those services began at the onset of the Transformation Plan and concluded in fiscal 2009.

We continued to execute our Transformation Plan through fiscal 2010. In our Steel Processing operating segment we have completed the diagnostic and implementation phases at each of our core facilities. Additionally, we have initiated the diagnostic process at our west coast stainless steel operation and our newly acquired facility in Cleveland, as well as in our Mexican joint venture, Serviacero. We anticipate that we will have substantially completed the Transformation Plan process at these facilities and one additional Steel Processing facility by December 31, 2010. In our Metal Framing operating segment, we have substantially completed the Transformation Plan process at eight facilities and anticipate completing the process at four additional facilities by December 31, 2010. We expect to incur additional restructuring charges relating to the Transformation Plan as we progress through the remaining Metal Framing and Steel Processing facilities, although these charges should decline over the coming quarters. Recent charges have been, and future charges are expected to be, largely comprised of continued severance, retirement and internal transformation team expense, as well as non-cash impairment losses and accelerated depreciation expense for impacted assets. The need for other restructuring charges will depend largely on recommendations developed from the Transformation Plan.

As of May 31, 2010, a total of $65,395,000 related to the Transformation Plan had been recorded as restructuring and other expense in the consolidated statements of earnings, as follows: $4,243,000 in fiscal 2010; $43,041,000 in fiscal 2009; and $18,111,000 in fiscal 2008. A progressionupon closing of the liabilities created as part of the Transformation Plan, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line item in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2010, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  5/31/2009
Liability
  Expense  Payments  Adjustments  5/31/2010
Liability

Early retirement and severance

  $3,201  $3,948   $(6,223 $(33 $893

Professional fees and other costs

   999   3,160    (3,599  -    560
                    
  $4,200   7,108   $(9,822 $(33 $1,453
                 

Non-cash charges

     3,408     

Net gain on dispositions

     (4,336   

Other

     (1,937   
          

Restructuring and other expense

    $4,243     
          

The non-cash charges of $3,408,000, above, represent accelerated depreciation expense for assets determined to be impaired as a result of the efforts of the Transformation Plan, but which continue to be held and used.

The $4,336,000 net gain on dispositions above includes the previously noted gain from the sale of remaining assets of the Louisville facility, immaterial losses from other above-noted facilities and a gain of $3,773,000 on the sale of our Metal Framing operations in Canada. The sale of our Metal Framing operations in Canada included two manufacturing facilities located in Burnaby, British Columbia, and Mississauga, Ontario, and two sales and distribution centers located in LaSalle, Quebec, and Edmonton, Alberta. Because the sale did not meet the criteria for classification as discontinued operations, the resulting gain has been included within operating income in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings.

The other line item above represents the $1,937,000 reversal of a reserve that was established during the sale and related impairment of the steel processing facility in Decatur, Alabama, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004. Certain conditions anticipated when the reserve was established did not materialize, and a portion of the reserve was therefore reversed. The remaining reserve for this matter is not material.

Note N – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or a group of assets may not be recoverable. When a potential impairment is indicated, accounting standards require a charge to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements if the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets exceeds the fair value of that asset or group of assets. The loss recognized would be the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions during fiscal 2009, we determined that certain indicators of impairment were present. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment loss was indicated at May 31, 2009.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting the Steel Packaging operating segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for certain long-lived assets. Therefore, those long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Steel Packaging asset group was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment loss was recognized in the amount of $2,703,000. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at November 30, 2009. Refer to “Note R – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing operating segment and the then Construction Services operating segment during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarters ended August 31, 2009 and November 30, 2009. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. Other than as described at “Note M – Restructuring,” the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment losses were indicated.

Due to continued deterioration in business and market conditions impacting our Metal Framing operating segment and the then Construction Services operating segment during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that certain indicators of potential impairment were present for long-lived assets. Therefore, long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, were tested for impairment during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions.

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the Metal Framing asset group was more than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, there was no impairment loss at February 28, 2010 in the Metal Framing operating segment, other than that described at “Note R – Fair Value and “Note M – Restructuring.”

The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to an identified asset group within the then Construction Services operating segment (as previously reported and discussed within “Note H – Segment Data”) was less than the net book value for the asset group. Therefore, an impairment loss was recognized during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010 in the amount of $8,055,000. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, and was based on the excess of the assets’ carrying amounts over their respective fair values at February 28, 2010. The impaired assets consisted largely of customer lists and also included trade name and technology assets. Refer to “Note R – Fair Value” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Due largely to changes in the use of certain assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we determined that indicators of impairment were present. Therefore, long-lived assets were tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment loss was indicated at May 31, 2010, other than that described at “Note R – Fair Value” and “Note M – Restructuring.”

We test our goodwill balances for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that the characteristics of the components within each operating segment are similar and allow for their aggregation to the operating segment level for testing purposes. The test consists of determining the fair value of the operating segments, using discounted cash flows, and comparing the result to the carrying values of the operating segments. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment of the goodwill is indicated. The amount of the impairment would be determined by establishing the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the operating segment, excluding the goodwill, and comparing the total to the estimated fair value of the operating segment. The difference would represent the fair value of the goodwill; and, if it is lower than the book value of the goodwill, the difference would be recorded as a loss in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Due to industry changes, weakness in the construction market and the depressed results in the Metal Framing operating segment over the fiscal 2009 year, we tested this operating segment for impairment on a quarterly basis during fiscal 2009. During the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008, we again tested the value of the goodwill balances in the Metal Framing operating segment. Given the significant decline in the economy during fiscal 2009 and its impact on the construction market, we revised the forecasted cash flows and discount rate assumptions used in our previous valuations of this operating segment. The forecasted cash flows were revised downward due to the significant decline in, and the future uncertainty of, the economy. The discount rate, based on our then current cost of debt and equity capital, was changed due to the increased risk in our forecast. After reviewing the revised valuation and the fair value estimates of the remaining assets, it was determined that the value of the business no longer supported its $96,943,000 goodwill balance. As a result, the full amount was written-off in the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008.

The results of the then Construction Services operating segment (as previously reported and discussed within “Note H – Segment Data) continued to deteriorate as the anticipated economic recovery in the commercial construction industry has been pushed further into the future. As a result, management determined that impairment indicators existed in the recent past, as noted above, and the assets (long-lived assets as well as goodwill) of the then Construction Services operating segment were reviewed for potential impairment on a quarterly basis during fiscal 2010. These tests were performed in earlier periods with no impairment resulting. However, each successive test yielded a result closer to the point at which an impairment would be indicated. During the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010, we again tested the value of the goodwill balances in the then Construction Services operating segment. Based upon the continued

depression of the industry and the future uncertainty of the market, we revised the forecasted cash flows used in our previous valuations of this operating segment downward. After reviewing the revised valuation and the fair value estimates of the remaining net assets, it was determined that the value of the business no longer supported its $24,651,000 goodwill balance. As a result, the full amount was written-off in the third fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010. The impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings. Management continues to assess these businesses, as well as market and industry factors impacting the businesses, in order to determine the appropriate course of action going forward.

transaction. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, at which point only the Pressure Cylinders operating segment had remaining non-impaired goodwill recorded, the Company completed its annual test of goodwill. No additional impairments were identified during the Company’s annual assessment of goodwill, as the estimated fair value2011, we committed to plans to sell certain of the Pressure Cylinders operating segment exceeded its carrying value by a substantial amount. However, future declines inacquired steel processing assets, thereby meeting the market and deterioration in earnings could leadcriteria for classification as assets held for sale. Refer to additional impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ending May 31, 2010 and 2009, by reportable business segment, were as follows:

   Pressure
Cylinders
  Metal
Framing
  Other  Total 
(in thousands)             

Balance at June 1, 2008

     

Goodwill

  $79,507   $97,316   $6,700   $183,523  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    -    -    -  
                 
   79,507    97,316    6,700    183,523  

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   -    -    17,951    17,951  

Translation adjustments

   (2,815  (373  -    (3,188
                 

Impairment losses

   -    (96,943  -    (96,943
                 

Balance at May 31, 2009

     

Goodwill

  $76,692   $96,943   $24,651   $198,286  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    (96,943  -    (96,943
                 
   76,692    -    24,651    101,343  

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   5,495    -    -    5,495  

Translation adjustments

   (2,644  -    -    (2,644
                 

Impairment losses

   -    -    (24,651  (24,651
                 

Balance at May 31, 2010

     

Goodwill

   79,543    96,943    24,651    201,137  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    (96,943  (24,651  (121,594
                 
  $79,543   $-   $-   $79,543  
                 

The decrease in goodwill for the Other category was due to the impairment of the entire goodwill balance during fiscal 2010, as noted above.

Amortizable intangible assets are summarized as follows at May 31:

   2010  2009
(in thousands)  Cost  Accumulated
Amortization
  Cost  Accumulated
Amortization

Patents and trademarks

  $13,119  $8,246  $14,119  $7,655

Customer relationships

   23,443   6,775   19,981   5,845

Non-compete agreement

   2,100   1,844   1,900   1,286

Other

   3,070   903   2,970   542
                

Total

  $41,732  $17,768  $38,970  $15,328
                

The net increase in amortizable intangible assets was due largely to the acquisition of the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC on September 3, 2009 ($7,800,000, See “Note P – Acquisitions”),Fair Value” for additional information.

As discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in accordance with the acquisitionaccounting guidance for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, the consideration received, including the steel processing assets of Gibraltar ($4,701,000, See “Note P – Acquisitions”) andMMI, was recognized at fair value. Accordingly, the impairment of intangible assets associated with the asset write-down within the then Construction Services operating segment, as noted above ($8,055,000). Currency translation adjustments comprised the remainderenterprise fair value of the change in cost basis. Amortization expense was $4,124,000, $3,896,000acquired business, or $72,600,000, represents the purchase price for purposes of applying the purchase price allocation prescribed by the applicable accounting guidance. The assets acquired and $2,258,000 for fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. These intangibleliabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values. Intangible assets, areconsisting of customer relationships, will be amortized on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from 1 tolife of 15 years.

Estimated amortization expense for these intangibleThe following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets foracquired and liabilities assumed at the next five fiscal years is as follows:acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)   

2011

  $3,123

2012

   2,956

2013

   2,498

2014

   2,398

2015

   2,360
(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $24,470  

Inventories

   40,262  

Other current assets

   7,426  

Intangible assets

   300  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   16,319  
     

Total assets

   88,777  

Accounts payable

   (15,062

Accrued liabilities

   (1,115
     

Identifiable net assets

   72,600  

Goodwill

   -  
     

Total purchase price

  $72,600  
     

Note O – GuaranteesNitin Cylinders Limited

On December 28, 2010, we acquired a 60% ownership interest in India-based Nitin Cylinders Limited for approximately $21,236,000 in cash to expand our presence in the alternative fuels cylinder market. Upon execution of the purchase agreement, the name of the company was changed to Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), which operates as a consolidated joint venture due to our controlling financial interest. WNCL is a manufacturer of high pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed industrial gases and Warrantiescompressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction.

The Company does not have guarantees that it believes are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of May 31, 2010,assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the Company was party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which the Company has guaranteed a residual value at the terminationexcess of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately $14,667,000 at May 31, 2010. Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company has estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to this guarantee, and determined thatpurchase price over the fair value of the obligationnet identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of WNCL, we identified and valued the following intangible assets:

(in thousands)  Amount   Average
Life

(Years)

Category

    

Trade name

  $850    Indefinite

Customer relationships

   160    15-20

Other

   230    1-10
       

Total acquired intangible assets

  $1,240    
       

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill of $7,174,000 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, as well as the acquisition-date fair value of the noncontrolling interest:

(in thousands)    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1,721  

Accounts receivable

   2,499  

Inventories

   9,916  

Other current assets

   652  

Intangible assets

   1,240  

Property, plant and equipment

   14,450  
     

Total identifiable assets

   30,478  

Accounts payable

   (1,227

Accrued liabilities

   (41

Deferred income taxes

   (992
     

Net identifiable assets

   28,218  

Goodwill

   7,174  
     

Net assets

   35,392  

Noncontrolling interest

   (14,156
     

Total consideration paid

  $21,236  
     

Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc.

On June 21, 2010, we acquired the assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”) for cash of $12,175,000. Hy-Mark manufactured extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial, specialty, and professional racing applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction. The assets of Hy-Mark were relocated to our pressure cylinders facility located in Mississippi subsequent to the acquisition date.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured and recognized based on those likely outcomestheir estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. Intangible assets, consisting mostly of customer lists, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of nine years.

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill of $4,362,000 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, which is not material.expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company also had in place $8,260,000 of outstanding stand-by letters of credit as of May 31, 2010. These letters of credit were issued to third-party service providersfollowing table summarizes the consideration paid and had no amounts drawn against them at May 31, 2010. Fairthe fair value of theses guarantee instruments, based on premiums paid, was not material at May 31, 2010.

We have established reserves for anticipated sales returns and allowances, including limited warranties on certain products. The liability for sales returns and allowances is primarily based on historical experience and current information. The liability amounts related to warranties were immaterial at May 31, 2010 and 2009.

Note P – Acquisitions

Effective June 1, 2009, we adopted updated accounting standards aimed at improving the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. As a result, transaction costs associated with the acquisitions of the steel processing assets of Gibraltar, assets relatedassigned to the businesses of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory,assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)    

Inventories

  $3,053  

Intangible assets

   2,660  

Property, plant and equipment

   2,100  
     

Identifiable net assets

   7,813  

Goodwill

   4,362  
     

Total purchase price

  $12,175  
     

Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. (collectively, “Piper”) and the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC (“SCI”) were expensed, and recorded within selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of earnings, and a gain on the Piper acquisition was recorded, as discussed below.

On February 1, 2010, the Companyin exchange for cash consideration of $29,164,000, we acquired the steel processing assets of Gibraltar for cash of $29,164,000. Those assetsIndustries, Inc. (the “Gibraltar Assets”), which became part of theour Steel Processing operating segment of Worthington.segment. The acquisition expanded the capabilities of the Company’sour cold-rolled strip business and itsour ability to service the needs of new and existing customers. The assets acquired wereincluded Gibraltar’s Cleveland, Ohio facility, equipment and inventory of Gibraltar’s Buffalo, New York facility and a warehouse in Detroit, Michigan. Also acquired was the stock of Cleveland Pickling, Inc., whose only asset is a 31.25% interest in Samuel Steel Pickling Company, a joint venture which operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and oneanother in Cleveland, Ohio.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities in the Gibraltar acquisition were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Intangible assets, consisting mostly of customer list,lists, will be amortized over a weighted average life of 9.7 years on a straight-line basis. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed approximated the purchase price, and therefore no goodwill, nor any bargain purchase gain, was generated. While

The following table summarizes the Company does not anticipate any changes toconsideration paid and the initial accounting for this transaction, final review of the purchased net assets and related fair value determinations remains in process and could result in future adjustments withinassigned to the measurement period, as defined within applicable accounting guidance.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed inat the Gibraltar acquisition were as follows:date:

 

(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $274  

Inventories

   24,059  

Other current assets

   143  

Intangible assets

   4,701  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   18,406  

Investment in affiliate

   2,500  
     

Total assets

   50,083  

Accounts payable

   (19,832

Accrued liabilities

   (1,087
     

Identifiable net assets

   29,164  

Goodwill

   -  
     

Total purchase price

  $29,164  
     

Structural Composites Industries, LLC

On September 3, 2009, the Companywe acquired the membership interests of SCIStructural Composites Industries, LLC (“SCI”) for cash of $24,221,000. SCI is a manufacturer of lightweight, aluminum-lined, composite-wrapped high pressure cylinders used in commercial, military, marine and aerospace applications. Product linesProducts of SCI include cylinders for alternative fuel vehicles using compressed natural gas or hydrogen, self-contained breathing apparatuses,

aviation oxygen and escape slides, military applications, home oxygen therapy and advanced and cryogenic structures. SCI operates as part of Worthington’sour Pressure Cylinders operating segment. The acquisition of SCI allowed the Companyus to continue to grow theour Pressure Cylinders business and provided an entry into weight critical applications, further broadening the portfolio beyond the operating segment’s original, core markets.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities in the SCI acquisition were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets. Intangible assets, consisting mostly of customer lists, trade name and technology, will be amortized over a weighted average life of 13.5 years on a straight-line basis.

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill of $5,495,000 is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed inat the SCI acquisition were as follows:date:

 

(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $2,897  

Inventories

   4,929  

Other current assets

   116  

Intangible assets

   7,800  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   6,117  
     

Total assets

   21,859  

Accounts payable

   (1,535

Accrued liabilities

   (1,576

Other liabilities

   (22
     

Identifiable net assets

   18,726  

Goodwill

   5,495  
     

Total purchase price

  $24,221  
     

Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc.

On June 1, 2009, Worthingtonwe purchased substantially all of the assets of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. (collectively, “Piper”) for cash of $9,713,000. Piper is a manufacturer of aluminum high pressure cylinders and impact extruded steel and aluminum parts, serving the medical, automotive, defense, oil services and other commercial markets, with one manufacturing location in New Albany, Mississippi. It operates as part of Worthington’sour Pressure Cylinders operating segment. Piper’s aluminum products increaseincreased our line of industrial gas product offerings and present an opportunity to increase our participation in the growing medical market.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities in the Piper acquisition were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with the gain on the acquisition of $891,000 representing the excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets over the purchase price. The Company wasWe were able to realize a gain on this transaction as a result of the then current market conditions and the sellers’ desire to exit the business. The gain on this transaction was recorded in miscellaneous income (expense) on theour consolidated statements of earnings.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed inat the Piper acquisition were as follows:date:

 

(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $3,935  

Inventories

   4,142  

Other current assets

   296  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   4,300  
     

Total assets

   12,673  

Accounts payable

   (1,711

Accrued liabilities

   (358
     

Identifiable net assets

   10,604  

Gain on acquisition

   (891
     

Total purchase price

  $9,713  
     

Laser Products

On July 31, 2008, our Steelpac subsidiary purchased the assets of Laser Products (“Laser”) for $3,425,000. Laser is a steel rack fabricator primarily serving the auto industry. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities, in the Laser acquisition, which consisted of working capital, fixed assets and the customer list, were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The customer list is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its ten years.year estimated useful life.

The Sharon Companies Ltd.

On June 2, 2008, Worthingtonwe purchased substantially all of the assets of The Sharon Companies Ltd. (“Sharon Stairs”) for $37,150,000. Sharon Stairs, now referred to as Worthington Stairs, LLC, designs and manufactures steel egress stair systems for the commercial construction market, and operates one manufacturing facility in Akron, Ohio. Sharon Stairs was acquired in order to complimentcomplement the existing construction businesses and to our build synergies across the Companycompany while sharing best practices in manufacturing and fabricating.

The assets acquired assets in the Sharon Stairs acquisitionand liabilities assumed were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets. Intangible assets, consisting mostly of customer lists, trade name and technology, were to be amortized over a weighted average life of 13 years on a straight-line basis.

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill of $17,951,000 is expected towill be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed inat the Sharon Stairs acquisition were as follows:date:

 

(in thousands)       

Current assets

  $8,520  $8,520  

Intangible assets

   12,440   12,440  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   2,500   2,500  
       

Total assets

   23,460   23,460  

Current liabilities

   3,841   (3,841

Other liabilities

   20   (20

Long-term debt

   400   (400
       

Identifiable net assets

   19,199   19,199  

Goodwill

   17,951   17,951  
       

Total purchase price

  $37,150  $37,150  
       

During fiscal 2010, the Companywe recognized an impairment loss that significantly reduced the value of intangible assets (including goodwill) recorded in conjunction with the acquisition of the assets of Sharon Stairs. See “Note NC – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional details.

Operating results of each above-notedacquired business hasnoted above have been included in the consolidated statements of earnings from the respective acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired businesses described above since the beginning of fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2009, as appropriate based on the acquisition date, would not be materially different than the actual results reported.

Note QOBusiness InterruptionDerivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

On January 5, 2008, Severstal North America, Inc. (“Severstal”) experienced a furnace outage. Severstal is aWe utilize derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to certain risks related to our ongoing operations. The primary steel supplier to,risks managed through the use of derivative instruments include interest rate risk, currency exchange risk and a minority partner in, our Spartan. Severstal is also a steel supplier to somecommodity price risk. While certain of our other Steel Processing locationsderivative instruments are designated as hedging instruments, we also enter into derivative instruments that are designed to hedge a risk, but are not designated as hedging instruments and therefore do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are adjusted to current fair value through earnings at the end of each period.

Interest Rate Risk Management – We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on cash flows and the market value of our borrowings. We utilize a mix of debt maturities along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt to manage changes in interest rates. In addition, we enter into interest rate swaps to further manage our exposure to interest rate variations related to our borrowings and to lower our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. Business interruption losses were incurredoverall borrowing costs.

Currency Exchange Risk Management – We conduct business in several major international currencies and are therefore subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. We enter into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to manage this exposure. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. The translation of foreign currencies into United States dollars also subjects us to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates; however, derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk.

Commodity Price Risk Management – We are exposed to changes in the formprice of lost sales and added costs for material, freight, scrapcertain commodities, including steel, natural gas, zinc and other items. The additional expenses incurred for material costs, freightraw materials, and scrap in excessour utility requirements. Our objective is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with forecasted purchases of these commodities to allow management to focus its attention on business operations. Accordingly, we enter into derivative contracts to manage the price risk associated with these forecasted purchases.

We are exposed to counterparty credit risk on all of our deductiblederivative instruments. Accordingly, we have been offset by proceeds fromestablished and maintain strict counterparty credit guidelines and enter into derivative instruments only with major financial institutions. We do not have significant exposure to any one counterparty and management believes the risk of loss is remote and, in any event, would not be material.

Refer to “NOTE P – Fair Value” for additional information regarding the accounting treatment for our insurance company. Net proceedsderivative instruments, as well as how fair value is determined.

The following table summarizes the fair value of $5,749,000 from final settlement ofour derivative instruments and the insurance claimrespective line item in which they were recorded in costthe consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2011:

   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
Location
   Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   Receivables    $-    Accounts payable  $2,024  
   Other assets     -    Other liabilities   10,375  
              
     -       12,399  
              

Commodity contracts

   Receivables     194    Accounts payable   -  
   Other assets     -    Other liabilities   -  
              
     194       -  
              

Totals

    $194      $12,399  
              

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

   Receivables    $944    Accounts payable  $-  
   Other assets     -    Other accrued items   -  
              
     944       -  
              

Foreign exchange contracts

   Receivables     -    Accounts payable   -  
   Other assets     -    Other accrued items   573  
              
     -       573  
              

Totals

    $944      $573  
              

Total Derivative Instruments

    $1,138      $12,972  
              

The following table summarizes the fair value of goods soldour derivative instruments and the respective line item in which they were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2010:

   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-    Accounts payable  $2,026  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   8,558  
              
     -       10,584  
              

Commodity contracts

  Receivables   768    Accounts payable   -  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   -  
              
     768       -  
              

Totals

    $768      $10,584  
              

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

  Receivables  $-    Accounts payable  $409  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   -  
              
     -       409  
              

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   -    Accounts payable   -  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   233  
              
     -       233  
              

Totals

    $-      $642  
              

Total Derivative Instruments

    $768      $11,226  
              

Cash Flow Hedges

We enter into derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and commodity price fluctuations associated with certain forecasted transactions. These derivative instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings immediately.

The following table summarizes our cash flow hedges outstanding at May 31, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)  Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date

Commodity contracts

  $7,100    November 2011

Interest rate contracts

   100,000    December 2014

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in OCI and the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings for derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges during the fiscal quarteryears ended February 28, 2009 to offset the reduced profit from lost sales at Spartan. Our partner’s portionMay 31, 2011 and 2010:

(in thousands)  Income
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Location of
Income (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI

(Effective
Portion)
  Income
(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Location of
Income (Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing
  Income
(Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded
from
Effectiveness
Testing
 

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(5,724 Interest expense  $(4,043 Interest expense  $-  

Commodity contracts

   1,401   Cost of goods sold   125   Cost of goods sold   -  
                 

Totals

  $(4,323   $(3,918   $-  
                 

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(6,857 Interest expense  $(3,643 Interest expense  $-  

Commodity contracts

   883   Cost of goods sold   202   Cost of goods sold   95  
                 

Totals

  $(5,974   $(3,441   $95  
                 

The estimated net amount of the net proceeds was $2,760,000, and includedlosses in AOCI at May 31, 2011 expected to be reclassified into net earnings attributablewithin the succeeding twelve months is $1,220,000 (net of tax of $610,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2011, and will change before actual reclassification from other comprehensive income to noncontrolling interestnet earnings during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012.

Economic (Non-designated) Hedges

We enter into foreign currency contracts to manage our foreign exchange exposure related to inter-company and financing transactions that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment. We also enter into certain commodity contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, these derivative instruments are adjusted to current market value at the end of each period through earnings.

The following table summarizes our economic (non-designated) derivative instruments outstanding at May 31, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)  Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date(s)

Commodity contracts

  $13,200    June 2011 - October 2012

Foreign currency contracts

   50,500    August 2011

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings for economic (non-designated) derivative financial instruments during the fiscal 2009.years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010:

      Income (Loss) Recognized
in Earnings
 
   Location of Income  (Loss)
Recognized in Earnings
  Fiscal Year Ended
May  31,
 
(in thousands)        2011          2010     

Commodity contracts

  Cost of goods sold  $488   $(15

Foreign exchange contracts

  Miscellaneous income (expense)   (7,497  6,481  
           

Total

    $(7,009 $6,466  
           

The gain (loss) on the foreign currency derivatives significantly offsets the gain (loss) on the hedged item.

Note RP – Fair Value

Effective June 1, 2008, we adopted accounting guidance that established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance was effective for our financial assets and liabilities after May 31, 2008, and was effective for our non-financial assets and liabilities after May 31, 2009. The adoption of this fair value guidance did not have a material impact on amounts within our consolidated financial statements.

Fair value is an exitdefined as the price representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.participants at the measurement date. Fair value is an exit price concept that assumes an orderly transaction between willing market participants and is required to be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. Current authoritative accounting guidance usesestablishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that classifies assetsas a basis for considering such assumptions and liabilities based onfor classifying the inputs used in the valuation methodologies. In accordance with this guidance, we measuredThis hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair values are as follows:

Level 1

Observable prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

At May 31, 2011, our derivative contracts at fair value. We classified these as level 2financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as they are based upon models utilizing market observable inputs and credit risk. Derivative instruments are executed only with highly rated financial

follows:

institutions. No credit loss is anticipated on existing instruments, and no material credit losses have been experienced to date. The Company continues to monitor its positions, as well as the credit ratings of counterparties to those positions.

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Commodity derivative contracts

  $  -    $1,138    $  -    $1,138  
                    

Liabilities

        

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  $-    $573    $-    $573  

Interest rate derivative contracts

   -     12,399     -     12,399  

Commodity derivative contracts

   -     -     -     -  
                    

Total liabilities

  $-    $12,972    $-    $12,972  
                    

At May 31, 2010, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Commodity derivative contracts

  $  -    $768    $  -    $768  
                    

Liabilities

        

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  $-    $233    $-    $233  

Interest rate derivative contracts

   -     10,584     -     10,584  

Commodity derivative contracts

   -     409     -     409  
                    

Total liabilities

  $-    $11,226    $-    $11,226  
                    

At May 31, 2009, our financial assets and liabilities measured atThe fair value of our foreign currency contracts, commodity contracts and interest rate contracts is based on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
  Totals

Assets

        

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  $  -  $1,135  $  -  $1,135
                

Liabilities

        

Foreign currency derivative contracts

  $-  $769  $-  $769

Interest rate derivative contracts

   -   7,899   -   7,899
                

Total liabilities

  $-  $8,668  $-  $8,668
                

the present value of the expected future cash flows considering the risks involved, including non-performance risk, and using discount rates appropriate for the respective maturities. Market observable, Level 2 inputs are used to determine the present value of the expected future cash flows. Refer to “Note SO – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding the location within the consolidated balance sheets and the risk classificationour use of the Company’s derivative instruments.

At May 31, 2010, the2011, our assets measured at fair values of the Company’s assets measuredvalue on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:

 

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
  Totals  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

                

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

  $  -    $-    $86,654    $86,654  

Long-lived assets held for sale

  $  -  $1,315  $-  $1,315   -     9,681     -     9,681  

Long-lived assets held and used

   -   4,420   1,628   6,048   -     27,408     -     27,408  
                            

Total assets

  $-  $5,735  $1,628  $7,363  $-    $37,089    $86,654    $123,743  
                            

On March 1, 2011, as partial consideration for the net assets contributed to ClarkDietrich, we received a 25% interest in the newly-formed joint venture. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ClarkDietrich was recorded at its acquisition-date fair value of $58,250,000.

On May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels business to the ArtiFlex joint venture, we obtained a 50% interest in the newly-formed joint venture. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ArtiFlex was recorded at its acquisition-date fair value of $28,404,000.

A combination of the income approach and the market approach was applied to measure the fair value of our interests in both ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex. The income approach included the following inputs and assumptions:

An expectation regarding future revenue growth;

A perpetual long-term growth rate; and

A discount rate based on the estimated weighted average cost of capital.

The market approach was based on cash-free market multiples of selected comparable companies, adjusted for differences in size and scale. Each approach resulted in a business enterprise value that was comparable.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we committed to plans to sell certain steel processing assets acquired in connection with the MMI acquisition, thereby meeting the criteria for classification as assets held for sale. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, these assets are presented separately as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet. As the acquired assets were recorded at their acquisition-date fair value of $5,884,000, no impairment charges were recognized. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. The results of these facilities continue to be reported within operating income as they do not qualify for classification as a discontinued operation.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, certain metal framing assets that were not contributed to ClarkDietrich were written down to their fair value of $21,125,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,293,000. As more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with the gain recognized on the deconsolidation of the contributed net assets and the subsequent restructuring charges incurred in connection with the planned closure of these retained facilities. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. Certain assets retained subsequently met the criteria for classification as assets held for sale. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the net assets of these facilities are presented separately as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet. As the related assets had previously been written down to their fair value of $3,797,000, no additional impairment charges were recognized. The results of these facilities continue to be reported within operating income as they do not qualify for classification as a discontinued operation.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the long-lived assets of the Wooster Facility were written down to their fair value of $9,180,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $6,414,000. As more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line item in our consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with the gain recognized on the deconsolidation of the net assets contributed to ArtiFlex. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, certain long-lived assets of our Commercial Stairs business unit were written down to their fair value of $400,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $2,473,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. See “Note C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional information.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, certain long-lived assets of our Steel Packaging operating segment were written down to their fair value of $500,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,913,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. See “Note C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional information.

At May 31, 2010, our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Long-lived assets held for sale

  $  -    $1,315    $-    $1,315  

Long-lived assets held and used

   -     4,420     1,628     6,048  
                    

Total assets

  $-    $5,735    $1,628    $7,363  
                    

Certain steel processing assets that were located at Gibraltar’s Buffalo, New York, Steel Processingsteel processing facility were written down to their fair value of $1,315,000, resulting in an immaterial impairment charge, which was included in net earnings, within restructuring and other expense, for fiscal 2010. The assets’ fair values were determined based on market prices for similar assets. See “Note MDRestructuring”Restructuring and Other Expense” for additional details.

Certain assets of the Joliet, Illinois Metal Framing facility were written down to their fair value of $3,848,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,717,000, which was included in net earnings, within restructuring and other expense, for fiscal 2010. The assets’ fair values were determined based on market prices for similar assets. See “Note MDRestructuring”Restructuring and Other Expense” for additional details.

Certain assets of the Steel Packaging operating segment were written down to their fair value of $572,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $2,703,000, which was included in net earnings, within impairment of long-lived assets, for fiscal 2010. The assets’ fair values were determined based on market prices for similar assets. See “Note NC – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional details.

Certain assets within the then Construction Services operating segment (as previously reported and discussed within “Note HM – Segment Data”) were written down to their fair value of $1,628,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $8,055,000, which was included in net earnings, within impairment of long-lived assets, for fiscal 2010. The assets’ fair values were determined based on discounted cash flow models utilizing market observable inputs, as well as certain unobservable inputs. In determining the fair values of these assets, management was required to make certain assumptions regarding the expected cash flows and the discount rates used to determine the present values of those cash flows. Due to the weight of the unobservable inputs used, we have classified the values of these impaired assets as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. See “Note NC – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” for additional details.

Effective August 31, 2009, we adopted an accounting standard that updated guidance concerning interim disclosures about fair values of financial instruments. That standard requires disclosures about fair values of financial instruments in all interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.

The non-derivative financial instruments included in the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, income taxes receivable, other assets, deferred income taxes, accounts payable, notes payable,short-term borrowings, accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes, other accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other liabilities approximate fair values.value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, based upon models utilizing market observable inputs and credit risk, was $250,319,000$265,239,000 and $242,136,000$250,319,000 at May 31, 20102011 and May 31, 2009,2010, respectively. The carrying amounts of long-term debt, including current maturities, were $250,238,000$250,254,000 and $239,393,000$250,238,000 at May 31, 20102011 and May 31, 2010, respectively.

Note Q – Operating Leases

We lease certain property and equipment from third parties under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Rent expense under operating leases was $15,736,000, $16,681,000 and $15,467,000 in fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. Future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases having an initial or remaining term in excess of one year at May 31, 2011, were as follows:

(in thousands)    

2012

  $7,827  

2013

   6,903  

2014

   4,391  

2015

   2,894  

2016

   2,197  

Thereafter

   8,200  
     

Total

  $32,412  
     

Note R – Related Party Transactions

We purchase from, and sell to, affiliated companies certain raw materials and services at prevailing market prices. Net sales to affiliated companies for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 totaled $14,627,000, $9,336,000, and $18,550,000, respectively. Purchases from affiliated companies for fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 totaled $5,916,000, $4,701,000 and $2,799,000, respectively. Accounts receivable from affiliated companies were $23,211,000 and $4,377,000 at May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Accounts payable to affiliated companies were $16,690,000 and $3,048,000 at May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note S – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Interest Rate Risk – We entered into an interest rate swap in October 2004, which was amended December 17, 2004. The swap has a notional amount of $100,000,000 to hedge changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the LIBOR rate associated with the December 17, 2004 issuance of the 2014 Notes (see “Note C – Debt and Receivables Securitization”). We pay a fixed rate of 4.46% and receive a variable rate based on six-month LIBOR. The interest rate derivative is classified as a cash flow hedge. The effective portion of the changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in OCI and is reclassified to interest expense in the period in which earnings are impacted by the hedged item or in the period that the transaction no longer qualifies as a cash flow hedge.

Foreign Currency Risk – The translation of foreign currencies into United States Dollars subjects the Company to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates. Derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk; however, the Company does make use of forward contracts to manage exposure to certain

intercompany loans with our foreign affiliates. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. At May 31, 2010, the difference between the contract and book value of these instruments was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recorded either in the consolidated balance sheets under foreign currency translation or in net earnings in the same period in which foreign currency translation or net earnings are impacted by the hedged items.

Commodity Price Risk – The Company attempts to negotiate the best prices for commodities and to competitively price products and services to reflect the fluctuations in market prices. To further manage its exposure to fluctuations in the cost of steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials and utility requirements, the Company has used derivative instruments to cover periods commensurate with known or expected exposures. No derivative instruments are held for trading purposes. When qualified for hedge accounting, the effective portion of the changes in the fair value of cash flow derivatives is recorded in OCI and reclassified to cost of goods sold in the period in which earnings are impacted by the hedged items or in the period that the transaction no longer qualifies as a cash flow hedge. If the derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in their fair value are recorded directly in cost of goods sold.

Refer to “Note R – Fair Value” for additional information regarding the accounting treatment and Company policy for derivative instruments, as well as how fair value is determined for the Company’s derivative instruments.

The fair value of derivative instruments at May 31, 2010 is summarized in the following table:

   Asset Derivatives  Liability Derivatives
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
         Location        
  Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-  Accounts payable  $2,026
  Other assets   -  Other liabilities   8,558
            
     -     10,584
            

Commodity contracts

  Receivables   768  Accounts payable   -
  Other assets   -  Other liabilities   -
            
     768     -
            

Totals

    $768    $10,584
            

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

  Receivables  $-  Accounts payable  $409
  Other assets   -  Other accrued items   -
            
     -     409
            

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   -  Accounts payable   -
  Other assets   -  Other accrued items   233
            
     -     233
            

Totals

    $-    $642
            

Total Derivative Instruments

    $     768    $11,226
            

The fair value of derivative instruments at May 31, 2009 is summarized in the following table:

(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value

Derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-  Accounts payable  $1,134
  Other assets   -  Other liabilities   6,765
            

Totals

     -     7,899
            

Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   1,135  Accounts payable   -
  Other assets   -  Other accrued items   769
            

Totals

     1,135     769
            

Total Derivative Instruments

    $1,135    $8,668
            

The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings is summarized in the following tables:

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:

(in thousands)  Income
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Location of
Income (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Income
(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Location of
Income (Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing
  Income
(Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded
from
Effectiveness
Testing

For the twelve months ended May 31, 2010:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(6,857 Interest expense  $(3,643 Interest expense  $-
                

Commodity contracts

   883   Cost of goods sold   202   Cost of goods sold   95
                

Totals

  $(5,974   $(3,441   $95
                

For the twelve months ended May 31, 2009:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(7,997 Interest expense  $(1,627 Interest expense  $-

Commodity contracts

   (847 Cost of goods sold   2,306   Cost of goods sold   -
                

Totals

  $(8,844   $679     $-
                

The estimated net amount of the existing losses in AOCI at May 31, 2010 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months was $953,000 (net of tax of $525,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2010, and will change before actual reclassification from AOCI to net earnings during fiscal 2011.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

     Income (Loss) Recognized
in Earnings
 
   Location of Income (Loss)
Recognized in Earnings
 Twelve Months Ended
May 31,
 
(in thousands)       2010          2009     

Commodity contracts

  Cost of goods sold $(15 $(1,433

Foreign exchange contracts

  Miscellaneous income (expense)  6,481    5,570  
          

Total

   $6,466   $4,137  
          

The gain on the foreign currency derivatives significantly offsets the loss on the hedged item.

Note T – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following is a summary oftable summarizes the unaudited quarterly consolidated results of operations for fiscal 20102011 and fiscal 2009:2010:

 

(in thousands, except per share)  Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended 
Fiscal 2011  August 31   November 30   February 28 May 31 

Net sales

  $616,805    $580,687    $569,439   $675,693  

Gross margin

   78,914     69,819     88,254    119,170  

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

   22,354     14,469     26,326    51,917  

Earnings per share - basic

  $0.29    $0.20    $0.35   $0.71  

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.29     0.20     0.35    0.70  
Fiscal 2010  August 31  November 30 February 28 May 31   August 31   November 30   February 28 May 31 

Net sales

  $417,527  $447,981   $451,113   $626,413    $417,527    $447,981    $451,113   $626,413  

Gross margin

   49,200   67,233    57,714    105,783     49,200     67,233     57,714    105,783  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

   6,675   23,249    (17,740  33,057     6,675     23,249     (17,740  33,057  

Earnings (loss) per share - basic

  $0.08  $0.29   $(0.22 $0.42    $0.08    $0.29    $(0.22 $0.42  

Earnings (loss) per share - diluted

   0.08   0.29    (0.22  0.42     0.08     0.29     (0.22  0.42  
Fiscal 2009  August 31  November 30 February 28 May 31 

Net sales

  $913,222  $745,350   $501,125   $471,570  

Gross margin

   151,902   (54,419  39,921    37,330  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

   68,624   (164,654  1,554    (13,738

Earnings (loss) per share - basic

  $0.87  $(2.09 $0.02   $(0.17

Earnings (loss) per share - diluted

   0.86   (2.09  0.02    (0.17

The sum of the quarterly earnings (loss) per share data presented in the table may not equal the annual results due to rounding and the impact of dilutive securities on the annual versus the quarterly earnings (loss) per share calculations.

Results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended May 31, 2011) were favorably impacted by higher volumes, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments. An increased

spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel also favorably impacted our results for the three months ended May 31, 2011. Our results were also favorably impacted by a one-time gain of $10,436,000 related to the formation of the ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex joint ventures as more fully discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Results for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended February 28, 2011) were favorably impacted by a reduction in pre-tax impairment and restructuring charges over the comparable period in the prior year when we incurred charges of $35,481,000, or $0.28 per share, primarily related to the previously reported Construction Services segment. Higher volumes across all of our operating segments, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, and an increased spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel also favorably impacted our results for the three months ended February 28, 2011.

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended November 30, 2010) were negatively impacted by higher SG&A expenses driven by a $2,500,000 bad debt credit in the comparable prior year period, the impact of acquisitions, and higher profit sharing and bonus expenses due to higher earnings during the three months ended November 30, 2010 versus the comparable quarter in the prior year.

Results for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended August 31, 2010) were favorably impacted by higher volumes, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, and an increased spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel. The favorable impact of these items was offset by higher SG&A expenses due to the impact of acquisitions and increased profit sharing and bonus expenses as a result of higher earnings during the three months ended August 31, 2010 versus the comparable quarter in the prior year.

Results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 (ended May 31, 2010) were favorably impacted by increasedhigher volumes in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, and improved spreads between average selling price and the cost of steel. Strong performance from the Company’sour unconsolidated joint ventures also added to the favorable results during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Results for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 (ended February 28, 2010) were negatively impacted by pre-tax impairment and restructuring charges totaling $35,481,000, or $0.28 per share, primarily related to the previously reported Construction Services segment, which has since been reorganized.segment. The impairment charges within the then Construction Services segment included a write-off of goodwill of $24,651,000 and an additional $8,055,000 charge related to definitely-lived assets. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, results were also negatively impacted by $4,855,000, or $0.04 per share, in charges and legal fees related to the litigation with BernzOmatic.a former customer.

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 (ended November 30, 2009) were negatively impacted by $2,122,000 of restructuring and other expense, and $2,703,000 of impairment of long-lived assets. The restructuring and other expense primarily related to previously announced plant closures in the Metal Framing operating segment and the impairment of long-lived assets related to certain assets of the Steel Packaging operating segment. TheseThe negative impacts,impact of these items, however, werewas largely offset by restructuring and other income of $4,783,000, which resulted from gains on the sale of our Metal Framing operations in Canada and on the sale of the remaining assets of the Louisville, Kentucky, Steel Processing facility. The results for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were also favorably impacted by higher steel prices and operational improvements realized from efforts of the Transformation Plan.

Results for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 (ended August 31, 2009), were negatively impacted by $3,626,000 of restructuring and other expense, or $0.03 per diluted share. The restructuring and other expense primarily related to previously announced plant closures in the Metal Framing operating segment.

Results

Note T – Subsequent Events

On June 29, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 of our outstanding common shares. The common shares available for repurchase under this authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other appropriate factors. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. As discussed in “Note H – Equity,” we also have 494,802 common shares available for repurchase under our share repurchase program announced on September 26, 2007.

On June 29, 2011, our Board of Directors also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share, which represents a $0.02 per share increase from the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 (ended May 31, 2009) were negatively impacted by $6,044,0002011. The dividend is payable on September 29, 2011, to shareholders of restructuring and other expense.The restructuring and other expense primarily relatedrecord as of September 15, 2011.

On July 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Bernz for cash consideration of approximately $51,000,000, which is subject to previously announced plant closures in the Metal Framing operating segment and professional fees in the Other category. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, results were also negatively impacted by an inventory write-down adjustment totaling $6,278,000.certain post-closing adjustments. The inventory adjustment was necessitated by continued decline in demand and steel pricing within the Steel Processing operating segment. The combined negative impact of these items was $0.15 per diluted share.

Resultspurchase price allocation for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 (ended February 28, 2009) were negatively impacted by $16,309,000 of restructuring and other expense, or $0.10 per diluted share. The restructuring and other expense primarily related to previously announced plant closures in the Metal Framing operating segment and professional fees in the Other category.

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 (ended November 30, 2008) were negatively impacted by $11,936,000 of restructuring and other expense, or $0.10 per diluted share. The restructuring and other expense primarily related to previously announced plant closures in the Metal Framing operating segment and professional fees in the Other category. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, results were also negatively impacted by an inventory write-down adjustment totaling $98,021,000, or $0.86 per diluted share. The inventory adjustment was necessitated by the speed and severity of the decline in demand and steel pricing within the Steel Processing and Metal Framing operating segments. Additionally, results for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were negatively impacted by a $96,943,000 goodwill impairment, or $1.07 per diluted share.

Results forthis acquisition will be recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 (ended August 31, 2008), were negatively impacted by $8,752,0002012. Based on our preliminary valuation analysis, we expect to record working capital, property, plant and equipment, certain intangible assets, and certain assumed liabilities.

The purchase price included the settlement of restructuring and other expense, or $0.08 per diluted share. The restructuring and other expense primarilyan existing dispute with Bernz related to previously announced plant closuresour early termination of a three-year supply contract in fiscal 2007, as more fully described in “Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments.” In accordance with the Metal Framing operating segmentapplicable accounting guidance, we will recognize the effective settlement of this dispute at fair value, with any difference between fair value and professional fees in the Other category.

Note U – Subsequent Events

Effective August 31, 2009, we adopted guidance issued in May 2009 by the FASB, which established general standardsour recorded reserve recognized as a settlement gain or loss. Our assessment of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued. That guidance requires disclosurefair value is incomplete as of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated and whether the date corresponds with the time at which the financial statements were available for issue (as defined) or were issued. During February 2010, and effective immediately upon issuance, the FASB amended that guidance. As a result, the Company is no longer required to, and does not, disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.

On June 21, 2010, the Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired the assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”) for cash of $12,125,000. Hy-Mark is a manufacturer of extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial, specialty and professional racing applications. The assets acquired included Hy-Mark’s manufacturing assets and inventory. The assets will be relocated from Hy-Mark’s Hampton, Virginia, facility to the Worthington Cylinders Mississippi manufacturing location, complementing the medical cylinder lines and adding a range of beverage grade, industrial cylinders and aluminum scuba tanks. The initial purchase accounting for this transaction is not yet complete.

Subsequent to May 31, 2010 and through July 29, 2010, Worthington Industries, Inc. purchased 2,284,100 Worthington Industries common shares for approximately $31,323,000 from the 8,449,500 common shares remaining authorized for repurchase at May 31, 2010.filing.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

COL. A.    COL. B.    COL. C.     COL. D.     COL. E.    
Description    Balance at
Beginning of
Period
    Additions                
    Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
    Charged to
Other Accounts –
Describe (B)
     Deductions –
Describe (C)
   Balance at End
of Period
  
            

Year Ended May 31, 2010:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $ 12,470,000  $ (900,000) (A)  $ 29,000   $ 5,847,000   $ 5,752,000  
                   

Year Ended May 31, 2009:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $ 4,849,000  $ 8,472,000  $ 217,000   $ 1,068,000   $ 12,470,000  
                   

Year Ended May 31, 2008:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $ 3,641,000  $ 1,496,000  $ 127,000   $ 415,000   $ 4,849,000  
                   

COL. A.    COL. B.     COL. C.     COL. D.     COL. E.    
Description          Additions                
  

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

 

     Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
     Charged to
Other Accounts –
Describe (B)
     Deductions –
Describe (C)
   Balance at End
of Period
  

Year Ended May 31, 2011:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $5,752,000    $ 1,236,000    $ 106,000    $ 2,732,000(D)   $4,150,000   
                          

Year Ended May 31, 2010:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $12,470,000    $(900,000)(A)   $29,000    $5,847,000    $5,752,000   
                          

Year Ended May 31, 2009:

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $4,849,000    $8,472,000    $217,000    $1,068,000    $12,470,000   
                          

Note A – Net allowance reversal, adjusted through expense.

Note B – Miscellaneous amounts.

Note C – Uncollectable accounts charged to the allowance.

Note D – Includes $686,000 related to the deconsolidation of our metal framing business.

See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirm.

Item 9. — Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. — Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)] that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010)2011). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the last fiscal quarter (the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010)2011) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Annual Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, as appropriate; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010,2011, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included evaluation of such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies and our overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed under the direction of management.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Based on the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level as of May 31, 2010.2011. The results of management’s assessment were reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.

Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, independently assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and issued the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Worthington Industries, Inc.:

We have audited Worthington Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010,2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Worthington Industries, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Annual Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Worthington Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010,2011, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2010,2011, and our report dated July 30, 2010August 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

/S/    KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

July 30, 2010August 1, 2011

Item 9B. — Other Information

There is nothing to be reported under this Item 9B.

PART III

Item 10. — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors, Executive Officers and Persons Nominated or Chosen to Become Directors or Executive Officers

The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (“Worthington Industries” or the “Registrant”) and the nominees for re-election as directors of Worthington Industries at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 30, 201029, 2011 (the “2010“2011 Annual Meeting”) is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in Worthington Industries’ definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20102011 Annual Meeting (“Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of Worthington Industries’ fiscal 20102011 (the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010)2011).

The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the executive officers of Worthington Industries is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included under the caption “Supplemental Item – Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Procedures by which Shareholders may Recommend Nominees to Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors

Information concerning the procedures by which shareholders of Worthington Industries may recommend nominees to Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Committees of the Board – Nominating and Governance Committee” and “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Nominating Procedures” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement. These procedures have not materially changed from those described in Worthington Industries’ Definitivedefinitive Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 30, 2009.2010.

Audit Committee Matters

The information required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Committees of the Board” and “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Committees of the Board – Audit Committee” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Code of Conduct; Committee Charters; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Charter of Lead Independent Director

Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors has adopted Charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee as well as Corporate Governance Guidelines as contemplated by the applicable sections of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors has also adopted a Charter of the Lead Independent Director of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors.

In accordance with the requirements of Section 303A.10 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries has adopted a Code of Conduct covering the directors, officers and employees of Worthington Industries and its subsidiaries, including Worthington Industries’ Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Worthington Industries’ Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) and Worthington Industries’ Controller (the principal accounting officer). The Registrant will disclose the following events, if they occur, in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within the required four business days following their occurrence: (A) the date and nature of any amendment to a provision of Worthington Industries’ Code of Conduct that (i) applies to Worthington Industries’ principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, (ii) relates to any element of the “code of ethics” definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K, and (iii) is not a technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendment; and (B) a description of any waiver (including the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver), including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Conduct granted to Worthington Industries’ principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, that relates to one or more of the elements of the “code of ethics” definition set forth in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K. In addition, Worthington Industries will disclose any waivers from the provisions of the Code of Conduct granted to a director or executive officer of Worthington Industries in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within the required four business days following their occurrence.

The text of each of the Charter of the Audit Committee, the Charter of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, the Charter of the Executive Committee, the Charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Charter of the Lead Independent Director, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of Conduct is posted on the “Corporate Governance” page of the “Investor Relations” section of Worthington Industries’ web site located at www.worthingtonindustries.com. In addition, a copy of the Code of Conduct was filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009.

Item 11. — Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” and “COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

The information required by Item 407(e)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

The information required by Item 407(e)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Compensation Committee Report” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Ownership of Common Shares of Worthington Industries

The information required by Item 403 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information required by Item 201(d) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The information required by Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure in respect of John P. McConnell to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” and from the disclosure to be included under the caption “TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN RELATED PERSONS” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Director Independence

The information required by Item 407(a) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Director Independence” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20102011 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. — Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS – Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS – Pre-Approval of Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

PART IV

Item 15. — Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)

The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

 (1)

Consolidated Financial Statements:

The consolidated financial statements (and report thereon) listed below are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 20102011 and 20092010

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009

 

 (2)

Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are omitted because they are not required or the required information has been presented in the aforementioned consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

 (3)

Listing of Exhibits:

The exhibits listed on the “Index to Exhibits” beginning on page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference as noted in the “Index to Exhibits.” The “Index to Exhibits” specifically identifies each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

 

(b)

Exhibits: The exhibits listed on the “Index to Exhibits” beginning on page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference as noted in the “Index to Exhibits.”

 

(c)

Financial Statement Schedule: The financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) above is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

Date: July 30, 2010August 1, 2011

  By: /S/ JOHN P. MCCONNELL
   

John P. McConnell,

   

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

SIGNATURE

  

DATE

  

TITLE

/s/ John P. McConnell

John P. McConnell

  July 30, 2010August 1, 2011  

Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ B. Andrew Rose

B. Andrew Rose

  July 30, 2010August 1, 2011  

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Richard G. Welch

Richard G. Welch

  July 30, 2010August 1, 2011  

Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

*

Kerrii B. Anderson

*

Director

*

John B. Blystone

  *  

Director

*

Mark C. Davis

*

Director

*

Michael J. Endres

  *  

Director

*

Ozey K. Horton, Jr.

*

Director

*

Peter Karmanos, Jr.

  *  

Director

*

John R. Kasich

*Director

*

Carl A. Nelson, Jr.

  *  

Director

*

Sidney A. Ribeau

  *  

Director

*

Mary Schiavo

  *  

Director

*The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of each of the above-identified directors of the Registrant pursuant to powers of attorney executed by such directors, which powers of attorney are filed with this report as exhibits.

 

*By:

 

/s/ John P. McConnell

   Date: July 30, 2010August 1, 2011
 John P. McConnell   
 Attorney-In-Fact   

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

 

  

Description

 

    

Location

 

3.1  

Amended Articles of Incorporation of Worthington Industries, Inc., as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on October 13, 1998

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worthington Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Registrant”), for the quarterly period ended August 31, 1998 (SEC File No. 0-4016)

3.2  

Code of Regulations of Worthington Industries, Inc., as amended through September 28, 2000 [for SEC reporting compliance purposes only]

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2000 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

4.1  

$435,000,000 Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2005, among Worthington Industries, Inc., as Borrower; the Lenders party thereto; PNC Bank, National Association, as Issuing Lender, Swingline Lender and Administrative Agent; and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Syndication Agent and Sole Bookrunner; with The Bank of Nova Scotia and PNC Capital Markets, Inc. serving as Joint Lead Arrangers, and U.S. Bank National Association, Wachovia Bank, National Association and Comerica Bank serving as Co-Documentation Agents

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2005 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

4.2  

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, among Worthington Industries, Inc., as Borrower; the Lenders party thereto; and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2008 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

4.3  

Note Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2004, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and Allstate Life Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Principal Life Insurance Company

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2004 and filed with the SEC on December 21, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

4.4  

Form of Floating Rate Senior Note due December 17, 2014

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2004 and filed with the SEC on December 21, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

4.5  

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and the purchasers named therein regarding the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, and the $100,000,000 Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 17, 2014

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  4.6  

Indenture, dated as of April 13, 2010, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  4.7  

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 13, 2010, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  4.8  

Form of 6.50% Global NotesNote due April 15, 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.7)

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  4.9  

Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements defining rights of holders of long-term debt

   

Filed herewith

10.1  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan effective March 1, 2000*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Restatement effective as of December 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as Amended and Restated, effective June 1, 2000*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2000 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.4  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Restatement effective as of December 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.5  

Worthington Industries, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 0-4016)

10.6  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Restatement(amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.7  

Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement for non-qualified stock options granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan)*

   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.8  

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan entered into and to be entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock to employees of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.9  

Form of Letter Evidencing Cash Performance Awards and Performance Share Awards Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan) – Targets for 3-Year Period Ending May 31, 2010*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2007 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.10

Form of Letter Evidencing Cash Performance Awards and Performance Share Awardsbe Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan) – Targets for 3-Year Periods Ending on and after May 31, 2011*

   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.10

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Registrant in order to evidence the grant for 2011 effective as of June 30, 2011, of restricted common shares, which will vest in three years, pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.11

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Registrant with each of B. Andrew Rose and Mark A. Russell in order to evidence the grant effective as of June 30, 2011 of 185,000 common shares pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.12  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Restatement(amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1210.13  

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors for non-qualified stock options granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors) from and after September 25, 2003*2003*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1310.14  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option Plan (Restatement(amendment and restatement effective November 1, 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1410.15  

Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement for non-qualified stock options granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option Plan)*

   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1510.16  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Restatement(amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1610.17  

Form of Notice of Grant ofNon-Qualified Stock OptionsOption and OptionAward Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of nonqualifiednon-qualified stock options to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on September 27, 2006 and September 26, 2007*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2006 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1710.18  

Form of NonqualifiedNotice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) to evidence the grant of nonqualifiednon-qualified stock options to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on and after September 24, 2008*

   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1810.19  

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock on September 27, 2006 and September 26, 2007 to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2006 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.1910.20  

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on September 24, 2008 and to be entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence future grants of restricted stock to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2010.21

Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 5, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.22

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement entered into by Registrant in order to evidence the grant of non-qualified stock options to executive officers of Registrant effective as of June 30, 2011 pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan and to be entered into by Registrant in order to evidence future grants of non-qualified stock options to executive officers pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.23  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan for Executives (approved by shareholders on September 24, 2008)*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2008 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2110.24  

Form of Letter Evidencing Cash Performance Bonus Awards Granted and to be Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan for Executives*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2210.25  

Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(i) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2310.26  

Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2001, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(ii) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2410.27  

Amendment No. 2 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2004, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g)(x) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8399)

10.2510.28  

Amendment No. 3 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2005, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2610.29  

Amendment No. 4 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2008, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2710.30  

Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2009, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2810.31  

Amendment No. 6 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2009, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.2910.32  

Amendment No. 7 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3010.33  

Amendment No. 8 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2010, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.34

Amendment No. 9 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.35

Amendment No. 10 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.36

Amendment No. 11 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

Filed herewith

10.3110.37  

Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(iii) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3210.38  

Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 18, 2001, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(iv) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (File No. 1-8399)

10.3310.39  

Amendment No. 2, dated as of August 25, 2006, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3410.40  

Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 1, 2008, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, Worthington Taylor, Inc. and Worthington Receivables Corporation

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.41

Amendment No. 4, dated as of February 28, 2011, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, Dietrich Industries, Inc. and Worthington Receivables Corporation

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.42

Amendment No. 5, dated as of May 6, 2011, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, The Gerstenslager Company and Worthington Receivables Corporation

Filed herewith

10.43

Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc., effective June 1, 2006*2006 through August 31, 2011*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3510.44

Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc., approved June 29, 2011 and effective September, 2011*

Filed herewith

10.45  

Summary of Annual Base Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Filed herewith

10.36

Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards and Stock Options granted in Fiscal 2010 for Named Executive Officers*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3710.46  

Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards and Stock Options granted in Fiscal 2011 for Named Executive Officers*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.47

Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Awards granted in Fiscal 2012 for Named Executive Officers*

Filed herewith

10.3810.48  

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Worthington Industries, Inc. and each director of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

10.3910.49  

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Worthington Industries, Inc. and each executive officer of Worthington Industries, Inc.*

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

14  

Worthington Industries, Inc. Code of Conduct

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

21  

Subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc.

   

Filed herewith

23.1  

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)

   

Filed herewith

23.2  

Consent of Independent Auditor (KPMG LLP) with respect to consolidated financial statements of Worthington Armstrong Venture

   

Filed herewith

24  

Powers of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc.

   

Filed herewith

31.1  

Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Executive Officer)

   

Filed herewith

31.2  

Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Financial Officer)

   

Filed herewith

32.1  

Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer

   

FiledFurnished herewith

32.2  

Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Financial Officer

   

FiledFurnished herewith

99.1  

Worthington Armstrong Venture Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008

   

Filed herewith

101.INSXBRL Instance DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith #
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith#
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith#
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith#
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith#
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentSubmitted electronically herewith#

 

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangementarrangement.

# Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 of Worthington Industries, Inc. are the following documents formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):

(i)

Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 2011 and 2010;

 

(ii)

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009;

E-7

(iii)

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009;

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; and

(v)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – fiscal years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related documents in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and otherwise are not subject to liability under these Sections.

E-9