UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20102011

or

For the transition period fromto

This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company. Information contained in the Form 10-K relating to Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Each of Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company makes no representation as to information relating to registrants other than itself.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Wisconsin Power and Light Company Preferred Stock

(Accumulation without Par Value)

Indicate by check mark if the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Yes [  ]  No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports) and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  [X]x    No  [  ]¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [  ]x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, or smaller reporting companies. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  [  ]¨    No  [X]x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates as of June 30, 2010:2011:

Number of shares outstanding of each class of common stock as of Jan. 31, 2011:2012:

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statements relating to Alliant Energy Corporation’s and Wisconsin Power and Light Company’s 20112012 Annual Meetings of Shareowners are, or will be upon filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not of historical fact are forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified as such because the statements include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan” or other words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe future financial performance or plans or strategies are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such statements. Some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties of Alliant Energy Corporation (Alliant Energy), Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL) and Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL) include:

Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL assume no obligation, and disclaim any duty, to update the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORTS

Alliant Energy makes its periodic and current reports, and amendments to those reports, available, free of charge, on its website atwww.alliantenergy.com/investors on the same day as such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Alliant Energy is not including the information contained on its website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes information relating to Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL (as well as Alliant Energy Resources LLC (Resources) and Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc. (Corporate Services)). Where appropriate, information relating to a specific entity has been segregated and labeled as such. Unless otherwise noted, the information herein has been revised to exclude discontinued operations for all periods presented. Refer to Note 17 of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for information on businesses reported as discontinued operations.

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

A. GENERAL

Alliant Energy was incorporated in Wisconsin in 1981 and maintains its principal executive offices in Madison, Wisconsin. Alliant Energy operates as a regulated investor-owned public utility holding company. Alliant Energy’s primary focus is to provide regulated electricity and natural gas service to approximately 1 million electric and approximately 412,000414,000 natural gas customers in the Midwest through its two public utility subsidiaries. The primary first tier subsidiaries of Alliant Energy are: IPL, WPL, Resources and Corporate Services. An illustration of Alliant Energy’s first tier subsidiaries is shown below.

A brief description of the primary first tier subsidiaries of Alliant Energy is as follows:

1) IPL - was incorporated in 1925 in Iowa as Iowa Railway and Light Corporation. IPL is a public utility engaged principally in the generation and distribution of electricity and the distribution and transportation of natural gas in selective markets in Iowa and southern Minnesota. In Iowa, IPL provides utility services to incorporated communities as directed by the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) and utilizes non-exclusive franchises, which cover the use of public right-of-ways for utility facilities in incorporated communities for a maximum term of 25 years. At Dec. 31, 2010,2011, IPL supplied electric and gas service to 525,657525,770 and 233,792233,715 retail customers, respectively. IPL is also engaged in the generation and distribution of steam for two customers in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In 2011, 2010 2009 and 2008,2009, IPL had no single customer for which electric, gas, steam and/or other sales accounted for 10% or more of IPL’s consolidated revenues.

2) WPL - was incorporated in 1917 in Wisconsin as Eastern Wisconsin Electric Company. WPL is a public utility engaged principally in the generation and distribution of electricity and the distribution and transportation of natural gas in selective markets in southern and central Wisconsin. WPL operates in municipalities pursuant to permits of indefinite duration and state statutes authorizing utility operation in areas annexed by a municipality. At Dec. 31, 2010,2011, WPL supplied electric and gas service to 454,776456,637 and 178,570179,945 retail customers, respectively. In 2011, 2010 2009 and 2008,2009, WPL had no single customer for which electric, gas and/or other sales accounted for 10% or more of WPL’s consolidated revenues. WPL Transco LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WPL and holds WPL’s investment in the American Transmission Company LLC (ATC).

3) RESOURCES - was incorporated in 1988 in Wisconsin. In 2008, Resources was converted to a limited liability company. Alliant Energy’s non-regulated investments are organized under Resources. Refer to “D. Information Relating to Non-regulated Operations” for additional details.

4) CORPORATE SERVICES - was incorporated in 1997 in Iowa. Corporate Services provides administrative services to Alliant Energy and its subsidiaries.

Refer to Note 1415 of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further discussion of business segments, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

B. INFORMATION RELATING TO ALLIANT ENERGY ON A CONSOLIDATED BASIS

1) EMPLOYEES -At Dec. 31, 2010,2011, Alliant Energy’s consolidated subsidiaries had the following full- and part-time employees:

At Dec. 31, 2010,2011, Alliant Energy employees covered by collective bargaining agreements were as follows:

2) CAPITAL EXPENDITURE AND INVESTMENT PLANS -Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Cash Flows - Investing Activities - Construction and Acquisition Expenditures” in MDA for discussion of anticipated construction and acquisition expenditures for 2011, 2012 and 2013.through 2015.

3) REGULATION -Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL are subject to regulation by various federal, state and local agencies. The following includes the primary regulations impacting Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s businesses.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) - -

Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (PUHCA 2005) - Alliant Energy is registered with FERC as a public utility holding company, pursuant to PUHCA 2005, and is required to maintain certain records and to report certain transactions involving its public utilities, service company and other entities regulated by FERC. Corporate Services, IPL and WPL are subject to regulation by FERC under PUHCA 2005 for various issuesmatters including, but not limited to, affiliate transactions, public utility mergers, acquisitions and dispositions, issuance of securities (IPL only) and books and records requirements.

Energy Policy Act - The Energy Policy Act requires creation of an Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to provide oversight by FERC. FERC designated the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) as the overarching ERO. The Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO), which is a regional member of NERC, has direct responsibility for mandatory electric reliability standards for IPL and WPL.

Federal Power Act - FERC also has jurisdiction, under the Federal Power Act, over certain electric utility facilities and operations, electric wholesale and transmission rates, dividend payments, issuance of securities (IPL and Corporate Services only) and accounting practices of Corporate Services, IPL and WPL.

Electric Wholesale Rates - Corporate Services, as agent for both IPL and WPL, has received wholesale electric market-based rate authority from FERC. Market-based rate authorization allows for wholesale sales of electricity within the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO) and PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM) markets and in bilateral markets, based on the market value of the transactions. IPL and WPL also have FERC-approved cost-of-service based rates related to the provision of firm full- and partial-requirement wholesale electric sales. Both IPL’s and WPL’s wholesale cost-of-service tariffs are formula-based tariffs that allow for annual true-ups to actual costs, including fuel costs.

Electric Transmission Rates - FERC regulates the rates charged for electric transmission facilities used in interstate commerce. Neither IPL nor WPL own or operate electric transmission facilities; however, both IPL and WPL pay for the use of the interstate electric transmission system based upon FERC-regulated rates. IPL relies primarily upon the use of the ITC Midwest LLC (ITC) transmission system. WPL relies primarily upon the use of the ATC transmission system.

National Gas Act - FERC regulates the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act. Under the Natural Gas Act, FERC has authority over certain natural gas facilities and operations of IPL and WPL.

As part of routine procedures, in the fourth quarter of 2011, FERC commenced an audit of Alliant Energy, including its centralized service company (Corporate Services) and other affiliated companies. A final report is expected to be issued by FERC in late 2012 or early 2013. Alliant Energy does not believe that the final report will have any impact upon its financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental - -Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL are subject to extensive environmental requirements. The EPA administers certain federal regulatory programs and has delegated the administration of other environmental regulatory programs to the applicable state environmental agencies. In general, the state agencies have jurisdiction over air and water quality, hazardous substances management, transportation and transportation,clean-up, and solid waste management requirements. In certain cases, the state environmental agencies have delegated the administration of environmental programs to local agencies. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL are subject to these environmental regulations as a result of their current and past operations.

IUB -IPL is subject to regulation by the IUB related to its operations in Iowa for various issuesmatters including, but not limited to, retail utility rates and standards of service, accounting requirements and approval of the location and construction of electric generating facilities. As part of the IUB’s February 2011 order related to IPL’s Iowa retail electric rate case (2009 test year), the IUB outlined plans for IPL’s management activities to be audited by a third party vendor. This audit commenced in the third quarter of 2011. A final report is expected to be issued by the third party vendor to the IUB in the second half of 2012. Alliant Energy and IPL do not currently believe that the final report will have any impact upon their financial condition or results of operations.

Retail Utility Base Rates -IPL files periodic requests with the IUB for retail rate relief. These filings are based on historical test periods. The historical test periods may be adjusted for certain known and measurable capital additions placed in service by IPL within nine months from the end of the historical test period and certain known and measurable operating and maintenance expenses incurred by IPL within 12 months of the commencement of the proceeding. Interim retail rates can be placed in effect 10 days after the rate application filing, subject to refund, and must be based on past precedent. The IUB must decide on requests for retail rate relief within 10 months of the date of the application for which relief is filed, or the interim rates granted become permanent. Interim retail rates can be placed in effect 10 days after the rate application filing, subject to refund, and must be based on past precedent. Refer to “Rate Matters” in MDA for details of a retail electric base rate freeze effective for IPL’s Iowa customers through 2013.

Retail Commodity Cost Recovery Mechanisms -IPL’s retail electric and natural gas tariffs contain automatic adjustment clauses for changes in prudently incurred commodity costs required to serve its retail customers in Iowa. Any over- or under-collection of commodity costs for each given month are automatically reflected in future billings to retail customers.

Retail Electric Transmission Cost Recovery Mechanism - Effective in the first quarter ofFebruary 2011, electric transmission service expenses will bewere removed from base rates and billed to IPL’s Iowa retail electric retail customers through athe transmission cost rider approved by the IUB in January 2011.rider. This new cost recovery mechanism will provideprovides for subsequent adjustments to electric rates charged to Iowa retail electric retail customers for changes in electric transmission service expenses. Any over- or under-collection of electric transmission costs for each given month are automatically reflected in future billings to retail customers. The transmission cost rider will remain in effect until the IUB’s decision in IPL’s next retail electric base rate case, whereby the rider will be revisited.

Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery (EECR) Mechanism - -IPL’s electric and natural gas tariffs contain an energy efficiency cost recovery (EECR)EECR factor to recover prudently incurred energy efficiency costs incurred on behalf of IPL’s Iowa customers. EECR factors are revised annually, subject to approval by the IUB, and include a reconciliation to eliminate any over- or under-recovery of energy efficiency expenses from prior periods.

New Electric Generating Facilities -A Certificate of Public Convenience, Use and Necessity (GCU Certificate) application is required to be filed with the IUB for construction approval of any new electric generating facility located in Iowa with 25 MW or more of capacity.

Advance Rate Making Principles -Iowa Code §476.53 provides Iowa utilities with rate making principles prior to making certain generation investments in Iowa. Under Iowa Code §476.53, IPL must file for, and the IUB must provide,render a decision on, rate making principles for electric generating facilities located in Iowa that have received construction approval including new base-load (primarily defined as nuclear or coal-fired generation) facilities with a capacity of 300 MW or more, combined-cycle natural gas-fired facilities of any size and renewable generating resources, such as wind facilities, of any size. Upon approval of rate making principles by the IUB, IPL must either build the facility under the approved rate making principles, or not at all.

Electric Generating Facility Emission Control Projects - IPL is required to submit an Emissions Plan and Budget biennially to the IUB setting out a multi-year plan and budget for managing regulated emissions from its electric generating facilities in a cost-effective manner. IPL must simultaneously submit this plan and budget to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources for a determination of whether the plan and budget meets state environmental requirements for regulated emissions. The reasonable costs associated with implementing the plan are expected to be included in IPL’s future retail electric rates.

PSCW -Alliant Energy is subject to regulation by the PSCW for the type and amount of Alliant Energy’s investments in non-utility businesses and other affiliated interest activities, among other issues.matters. WPL is also subject to regulation by the PSCW related to its operations in Wisconsin for various issuesmatters including, but not limited to, retail utility rates and standards of service, accounting requirements, issuance and use of proceeds of securities, affiliate transactions, approval of the location and construction of electric generating facilities and certain other additions and extensions to facilities.

Retail Utility Base Rates -WPL files periodic requests with the PSCW for retail rate relief. These filings are required to be based on forward-looking test periods. There is no statutory time limit for the PSCW to decide retail rate requests. However, the PSCW attempts to process base retail rate cases in approximately 10 months and has the ability to approve interim retail rate relief, subject to refund, if necessary.

Retail Commodity Cost Recovery Mechanisms -

Electric - WPL’s retail electric base rates include estimates of annual fuel-related costs (fuel and purchased power energy costs) anticipated during the test period. During each electric retail rate proceeding or in a separate fuel cost plan approval proceeding, the PSCW sets fuel monitoring ranges based on the forecasted fuel-related costs used to determine rates in such proceeding. If WPL’s actual fuel-related costs fall outside these fuel monitoring ranges, WPL is authorized to defer the incremental over- or under-collection of fuel-related costs from electric retail customers that are outside the approved ranges. AnyDeferral of under-collections are reduced to the extent actual return on common equity earned by WPL during the fuel cost plan year exceeds the most recently authorized return on common equity. Subject to review and approval by the PSCW, any over- or under-collection of fuel-related costs for each year are reflected in future billings to retail customers. This cost recovery mechanism became effective for WPL on Jan. 1, 2011.

Natural Gas - WPL’s retail natural gas tariffs contain an automatic adjustment clause for changes in prudently incurred natural gas costs required to serve its retail gas customers. Any over- or under-collection of natural gas costs for each given month are automatically reflected in future billings to retail customers.

Energy Efficiency Cost RecoveryEECR Mechanism -WPL contributes a certain percentage of its annual retail utility revenues to help fund Focus on Energy, Wisconsin’s statewide energy efficiency and renewable energy resource program. ContributionsEstimated contributions to Focus on Energy, along with WPL-run energy efficiency program costs, are recovered from WPL’s retail customers through changes in base rates determined during periodic rate proceedings and include a reconciliation of such estimated amounts to eliminateactual costs incurred with any over- or under-recovery of contributions from prior periods.difference deferred for inclusion in future base rate changes.

New Electric Generating Facilities - - A Certificate of Authority (CA) application is required to be filed with the PSCW for construction approval of any new electric generating facility with a capacity of less than 100 MW. A Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity application is required to be filed with the PSCW for construction approval of any new electric generating facility with a capacity of 100 MW or more.more built in Wisconsin. In addition, WPL’s ownership and operation of electric generating facilities (including those located outside the state of Wisconsin) to serve Wisconsin customers is subject to retail utility rate regulation by the PSCW.

Electric Generating Facility Upgrades -A CA application is required to be filed with the PSCW for construction approval of any additions to electric generating facilities, including emission control projects that exceed a certain threshold amount. The current PSCW rules require a CA for projects with an estimated cost in excess of approximately $8 million.

Advance Rate Making Principles - - Wisconsin StatutesStatute §196.371 provideprovides Wisconsin utilities with the opportunity to request rate making principles prior to the purchase or construction of any nuclear or fossil-fueled electric generating facility or renewable generating resource, such as a wind facility, utilized to serve Wisconsin customers. WPL is not obligated to file for or accept authorized rate making principles under Wisconsin StatutesStatute §196.371. WPL can proceed with an approved project under traditional rate making terms.terms or accept authorized rate making principles under Wisconsin Statute §196.371.

MPUCMinnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) - IPL is subject to regulation by the MPUC related to its operations in Minnesota for various issuesmatters including, but not limited to, retail utility rates and standards of service, accounting requirements, issuance and use of proceeds of securities that encumber property in Minnesota, affiliate transactions, and approval of the location and construction of electric generating facilities located in Minnesota with a capacity in excess of 50 MW.

Retail Utility Rates - Requests for retail rate relief can be based on either historical or projected data and interim retail rates are permitted. IPL typically files requests for retail rate relief based on historical test periods. The historical test periods may be adjusted for certain known and measurable capital additions placed in service by IPL and operating and maintenance expenses incurred by IPL within 12 months of the end of the test year. Unless otherwise ordered, the MPUC must reach a final decision within 10 months of filing for retail rate relief; however, the MPUC can extend the timing by 90 days.

Renewable Energy Cost Recovery Mechanism -In November 2011, IPL received an order from the MPUC approving the implementation of an automatic cost recovery rider on a temporary basis to recover costs associated with renewable generation. The renewable energy rider does not require a base rate case for annual revision of rates charged to IPL’s Minnesota retail electric customers, but requires that the renewable energy costs incurred be fully reconciled against the revenues collected for such costs. Initially, this would allow recovery of IPL’s Whispering Willow - East wind project located in Iowa. In November 2011, the MPUC deferred judgment on the prudence of the Whispering Willow - East wind project costs. The initial recovery amount of the project costs will be allowed through the temporary renewable energy rider at a levelized cost of $51 per megawatt-hour (MWh). The final recovery amount of the project costs will be addressed in a separate proceeding that is expected to be completed in 2012.

Refer to Notes 1(b), 1(h), 2 and 12(e)13(d) of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” and “Rate Matters,” “Environmental Matters” and “Legislative Matters” in MDA for additional information regarding regulation and utility rate matters.

4) STRATEGIC OVERVIEW -Refer to “Strategic Overview” in MDA for discussion of various strategic actions by Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL.

C. INFORMATION RELATING TO UTILITY OPERATIONS

Alliant Energy’s utility business (IPL and WPL) has three segments: a) electric operations; b) gas operations; and c) other, which includes IPL’s steam operations, various other energy-related products and services, and the unallocated portions of the utility business. In 2010,2011, IPL’s and WPL’s operating revenues and operating income (loss) for these three utility business segments were as follows:

1) ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATIONS

General - Electric utility operations represent the largest operating segment for Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL. Alliant Energy’s electric utility operations are located in the Midwest with IPL providing electric service in Iowa and southern Minnesota and WPL providing electric service in Iowa, southern and central Wisconsin and southern Minnesota.Wisconsin. Refer to the “Electric Operating Information” tables for additional details regarding electric utility operations.

Jurisdictions - Electric utility revenues by state were as follows (dollars in millions):

The percentage of electric utility revenues regulated by IPL’s and WPL’s respective state commissionsthe IUB, PSCW, MPUC and FERC were as follows:

		IPL												WPL
		2011				2010				2009				2011				2010				2009
IUB			90	%			91	%			90	%			—				—				—
PSCW			—				—				—				85	%			84	%			80	%
MPUC			6	%			5	%			5	%			—				—				—
FERC			4	%			4	%			5	%			15	%			16	%			20	%
			100	%			100	%			100	%			100	%			100	%			100	%

Customers - The number of electric customers and communities served at Dec. 31, 20102011 was as follows:

IPL and WPL provide electric utility service to a diversified base of retail customers in several industries, with the largest concentrations in the food manufacturing, chemical (including ethanol) and paper industries. IPL’s retail customers in the above table are billed under base rates established by the IUB or MPUC that include recovery of and a return on investments in electric infrastructure and recovery of purchased electric capacity costs and other costs required to serve customers. Base rates chargedPrior to IPL’s Minnesota customers also include recovery of electric transmission service costs. Effective in the first quarter of 2011, electric transmission service expenses will bewere recovered from IPL’s retail electric customers in Iowa through changes in base rates. Effective February 2011, electric transmission service expenses were removed from base rates and billed to IPL’s Iowa retail electric customers through a transmission cost rider. This new cost recovery mechanism provides for subsequent adjustments to electric rates charged to IPL’s Iowa electric retail customers and billed separately through afor changes in electric transmission cost rider.service expenses. IPL’s electric production fuel and energy purchases costs are recovered pursuant to fuel adjustment clauses. WPL’s retail customers in the above table are billed under base rates established by the PSCW that include recovery of and a return on investments in electric infrastructure and recovery of electric production fuel and purchased energy costs, purchased electric capacity costs, electric transmission service costs and other costs required to serve customers. Effective in the first quarter ofJan. 1, 2011, a new electric fuel cost recovery mechanism was implemented for utilities in Wisconsin that allows WPL to deferdefers electric production fuel and energy purchases costs that exceed or fall below established fuel monitoring ranges.ranges through a new electric fuel cost recovery mechanism. WPL’s recovery of deferred electric production fuel and energy purchases costs is restricted if it earns in excess of its authorized return on common equity. Refer to “Rate Matters” in MDA for discussion of a potential retail electric rate filing by WPL in 2012.

Wholesale customers in the above table, which primarily consist of municipalities and rural electric cooperatives, are billed under wholesale service agreements. These agreements include standardized pricing mechanisms that are detailed in tariffs approved by FERC through wholesale rate case proceedings. The tariffs include an annual true-up process for actual costs incurred. A significant majority of IPL’s and WPL’s wholesale service agreements have terms that end after 2016.2017.

In addition, IPL and WPL have bulk power customers, included in “Other customers” in the above table, that are billed according to negotiated, long-term customer-specific contracts, pursuant to FERC-approved tariffs.

Seasonality -Electric sales are seasonal to some extent with the annual peak normally occurring in the summer months due to air conditioning requirements. In 2010,2011, the maximum peak hour demands were as follows:

Competition -Retail electric customers in Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota currently do not have the ability to choose their electric supplier. However, IPL and WPL attempt to attract new customers into their service territories in an effort to keep energy rates low for all. Although electric service in Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota is regulated, IPL and WPL still face competition from self-generation by large industrial customers, alternative energy sources, and petitions to municipalize (Iowa) as well as service territory expansions by municipal utilities through annexations (Wisconsin). Refer to “Rate Matters - Proposed Changes to Rate Recovery MechanismsOther - Economic Development Program” in MDA for discussion of the PSCW’s approval of an economic development program to attract and retain industrial customers in WPL’s service territory, which is currently being challenged by the Citizens Utility Board.territory.

Renewable Energy Standards (RES) -

Iowa -Electric utilities in Iowa are required to purchase or own their proportionate share of 105 MW of capacity and associated energy from alternate energy or small hydro facilities located in the utilities’ service area. IPL’s proportionate share is approximately 50 MW. As of Dec. 31, 2010,2011, IPL had met the requirements of this renewable energy standard.

Wisconsin -A Wisconsin Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) was established in 2006 that requires electric utilities in Wisconsin, including WPL, to increase the portion of their total Wisconsin retail electric sales supplied by renewable energy sources above a benchmark of average retail sales from renewables in 2001, 2002 and 2003. The RPS requiresrequired a 2% increase above the benchmark by 2010 and will require a 6% increase above the benchmark by 2015. Based on this RPS, WPL was required to supply a minimum of 6%5.28% of its total Wisconsin retail electric sales with renewable energy sources by 2010 and will be required to increase this amount to 10%9.28% by 2015. Wisconsin utilities may reach the RPS with renewable energy

generated by the utility, acquired under purchased power agreements (PPAs), or through the use of renewable resource credits. As of Dec. 31, 2010, WPL hadhas met the 2010 requirements of this renewable energy standard for 2010.and currently expects to meet the 2015 requirements of the RPS with its current wind generation and wind PPAs.

Minnesota -A Minnesota Renewable Energy Standard (RES)RES was established in 2007 that requires electric utilities operating in Minnesota, including IPL, to supply a minimum level of their total Minnesota retail electric sales with renewable energy sources by certain future dates. Based on this RES, IPL’s total Minnesota retail electric sales supplied with renewable energy sources must be at least 12% by 2012; 17% by 2016; 20% by 2020; and 25% by 2025. Utilities in Minnesota may meet the requirements of the RES with renewable energy generated by the utility, renewable energy acquired under PPAs or the use of renewable resourceenergy credits.

Refer IPL currently expects to “Strategic Overview - Generation Plans” in MDA for discussionsatisfy the 2012 requirements of Alliant Energy’s generation plan, which includes additional supply fromthe RES with its current wind generation that contributed towards meetingand wind PPAs, and supplemented as needed with renewable energy requirements discussed above.credits.

Energy Conservation -IPL and WPL continue to promote energy conservation, including their customers’ ability to efficiently manage their energy use. Refer to “Strategic Overview - Energy Efficiency Programs” in MDA for discussion of current energy efficiency programs at IPL and WPL.

Electric Supply - Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL have met historical customer demand of electricity and expect to continue meeting future demand through internally generated electric supply, electric supply from long-term PPAs and additional electric supply purchases from wholesale energy markets. Alliant Energy’s mix of electric supply experienced changes in recent years with WPL’s purchasepurchases of the Neenah Energy Facility in 2009 and Wisconsin Electric Power Company’s 25% interest in Edgewater Unit 5 in early 2011, the completion of IPL’s Whispering Willow - East wind project in late 2009, and the completion of WPL’s Bent Tree - Phase I wind project in early 2011. In addition, IPL retired2011, and IPL’s retirement of various electric generating units in 2010, which are discussed in Note 1(e) of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”2010. Alliant Energy expects its mix of electric supply to change further in the next fewseveral years with IPL’s potential construction of a new 600 MW natural gas-fired electric generating facility in Iowa, WPL’s anticipated purchasespurchase of Riverside, the anticipated decision not to enter into long-term agreements related to IPL’s and WEPCO’s 25% interest in Edgewater Unit 5WPL’s existing nuclear PPAs, and the anticipated retirement of additional generating units at IPL.units. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL periodically update their generation plans to identify longer term generation needs. These long-term generation plans are intended to meet customer demand, reduce reliance on PPAs and wholesale market purchases and mitigate the impacts of future plant retirements while maintaining compliance with long-term electric demand planning reserve margins, environmental requirements and renewable energy standards established by regulators. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL currently expect to meet utility customer demand in the future. However, unanticipated regional or local reliability issues could still arise in the event of unexpected delays in the construction of new generating and/or transmission facilities, retirement of generating facilities, generating facility outages, transmission system outages or extended periods of extreme weather conditions. Refer to the “Electric Operating Information” tables for a profile of the sources of electric supply used to meet customer demand for Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL from 20062007 to 2010.2011. Refer to “Strategic Overview - Generation Plans” in MDA for details of Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s future generation plan.plans.

Electric Demand Planning Reserve Margin (PRM) - IPL and WPL are required to maintain a PRM above their projected annual peak demand forecast to help ensure reliability of electric service to their customers. WPL is required to maintain a 14.5% PRM for long-term planning (planning years two through 10) and a PRM established by MISO for short-term planning. PRM requirements for IPL follow MISO’s reserve requirements. IPL and WPL currently have adequate capacity to meet the MISO PRM requirements.

Generation -IPL and WPL own a portfolio of electric generating facilities located in Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota with a diversified fuel mix including coal, natural gas and renewable resources. Refer to Item 2 Properties for details of IPL’s and WPL’s electric generating stations.

Generating Capacity - The generating capacity of IPL’s and WPL’s electric generating facilities is based upon MISO’s resource adequacy process, which uses the unforced capacity of the generating facilities. The generating capacity for the June 20102011 to May 20112012 planning period by fuel type in MWs was as follows:

(a)

RepresentsAs of Dec. 31, 2011, completed wind projects owned by Alliant Energy included IPL’s 200 MW Whispering Willow - East wind project in Franklin County, Iowa, WPL’s 68 MW Cedar Ridge wind project in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin and WPL’s 200 MW Bent Tree - Phase I wind project in Freeborn County, Minnesota. The amounts in the table above represent 0%, 9% and 8%0% of the capacity of IPL’s Whispering Willow - East, WPL’s Cedar Ridge and WPL’s Bent Tree - Phase I wind projects, owned by IPL and WPL, respectively, based upon the MISO resource adequacy process, which is determined separately for each wind site, during the planning period from June 20102011 to May 2011. As of Dec. 31, 2010, wind projects owned by Alliant Energy included IPL’s 200 MW Whispering Willow - East wind project in Franklin County, Iowa and WPL’s 68 MW Cedar Ridge wind project in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin. WPL’s 200 MW Bent Tree - Phase I wind project in Freeborn County, Minnesota was completed in early 2011 and was not included in the June 2010 to May 2011 MISO planning period.2012.

Fuel Costs - The average cost of delivered fuel per million British Thermal Units used for electric generation was as follows:

Coal - Coal is the primary fuel source for Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s internally generated electric supply and generally represents approximately 50% to 55% of their total sources of electric energy. Alliant Energy, through Corporate Services as agent for IPL and WPL, has entered into contracts with different suppliers to help ensure that a specified supply of coal is available at known prices for IPL’s and WPL’s coal-fired generating facilities for 2011 through2012 and 2013. As of Dec. 31, 2010,2011, existing contracts provide for a portfolio of coal supplies that cover approximately 78%, 17%,80% and 9%50% of Alliant Energy’sIPL’s and WPL’s estimated coal supply needs for 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL believe this portfolio of coal supplies represents a reasonable balance between the risks of insufficient supplies and those associated with being unable to respond to future coal market changes. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL expect to meet remaining coal requirements from either future contracts or purchases in the spot market. Alliant Energy, through its subsidiaries Corporate Services, IPL and WPL, also enters into various coal transportation agreements to meet its coal supply requirements. As of Dec. 31, 2010,2011, existing coal transportation agreements cover approximately 70%100%, 70%50%, 50% and 50%15% of Alliant Energy’sIPL’s estimated coal transportation needs for 20112012 through 2014,2015, respectively, and 100%, 100%, 100% and 30% of WPL’s estimated coal transportation needs for 2012 through 2015, respectively.

The majorityNearly all of the coal utilized by IPL and WPL is from the Wyoming Powder River Basin. A majority of this coal is transported by rail-car directly from Wyoming to IPL’s and WPL’s generating stations, with the remainder transported from Wyoming to the Mississippi River by rail-car and then via barges to the final destination. As protection against interruptions in coal deliveries, IPL and WPL strive to maintain average coal inventory supply targets of 25 to 50 days for generating stations with year-round deliveries and 30 to 150 days (depending upon the time of year) for generating stations with seasonal deliveries. Actual inventory averages for 20102011 were 5043 days for generating stations with year-round deliveries and 138103 days for generating stations with seasonal deliveries. The average days on hand were computed based on actual tons of inventory divided by estimated average daily tons burned in 2010.2011. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL periodically test coal from sources other than the Wyoming Powder River Basin to determine which alternative sources of coal are most compatible with their generating stations. Access to alternative sources of coal is expected to provide Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL with further protection against interruptions and lessen their dependence on their primary coal source.

Average delivered fossil fuel costs are expected to increase in the future due to price structures and adjustment provisions in existing coal contracts, rate structures and adjustment provisions in existing transportation contracts, fuel-related surcharges incorporated by transportation carriers and recentexpected future coal and transportation market trends. Existing coal commodity contracts with terms of greater than one year have fixed future year prices that generally reflect recent market trends. A few of Alliant Energy’s existing coal contracts have provisions for price adjustments should specific indices change. Rate adjustment provisions in older transportation contracts are primarily based on changes in the Rail Cost Adjustment Factor as published by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. Rate adjustment provisions in more recent transportation contracts are based on changes in the All Inclusive Index Less Fuel as published by the Association of American Railroads. These more recent transportation contracts also contain fuel surcharges that are subject to change monthly based on changes in diesel fuel prices. Other factors that may impact coal prices for future commitments are increasing costs for supplier mineral rights, increasing costs to mine the coal and changes in various associated laws and regulations. For example, emission restrictions related to sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and mercury, along with other environmental limitations on generating stations, continue to increase and will likely limit the ability to obtain, and further increase the cost of, adequate coal supplies. Factors that may impact future transportation rates include, but are not limited to: the need for railroads to enhance/expand infrastructure for demand growth, corresponding investments in locomotives and the desire to improve margins on coal movements commensurate with margins on non-coal movements.

GivenAlliant Energy, IPL and WPL believe they are reasonably insulated against coal price volatility given their current coal procurement process, the specific coal market in their primary purchase region and regulatory cost-recovery mechanisms, Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL believe they are reasonably insulated against coal price volatility.mechanisms. Alliant Energy’s coal procurement process stresses periodic purchases, staggering of contract terms, stair-stepped levels of supply going forward for multiple years and supplier diversity. Similarly, given the term lengths of its transportation agreements, Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL believes they are reasonably insulated against future higher coal transportation rates from the major railroads.

Natural Gas - Alliant Energy owns several natural gas-fired generating facilities including IPL’s 565 MW Emery Generating Station, WPL’s 300 MW Neenah Energy Facility and Resources’ 300 MW Sheboygan Falls Energy Facility. WPL has exclusive rights to the output of the Sheboygan Falls Energy Facility under an affiliated lease agreement. These facilities help meet customer demand for electricity generally during peak hour demands. Internally generated electric supply from natural gas-fired generating facilities generally representrepresents less than 5% of Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s total sources of electric energy.

Alliant Energy has responsibility to supply natural gas to the generating facilities it owns as well as Riverside, which WPL has rights to under a PPA. WPL has contracted with ANR Pipeline (ANR) to provide firm pipeline transportation of 60,000 dekatherms (Dths) per day for Riverside and 2 million Dths of storage capacity for WPL’s natural gas-fired generating facilities.

Nuclear - In 2006, IPL sold its interest in the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) to a subsidiary of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NextEra) and upon closing of the sale entered into a PPA with NextEra to purchase energy and capacity from DAEC through February 2014. In 2005, WPL sold its interest in the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (Kewaunee) to a subsidiary of Dominion Resources, Inc. (Dominion) and upon closing of the sale entered into a long-term PPA with Dominion to purchase energy and capacity from Kewaunee through December 2013. As a result of these transactions, Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL no longer have ownership interests in any nuclear generating facilities. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL entered into these transactions to reduce the financial and operational uncertainty associated with nuclear generating facility ownership and operations while still retaining the benefit of the output from such nuclear generating facilities.

Wind - IPL’s 200 MW Whispering Willow - East wind project in Franklin County, Iowa began generating electricity in 2009. WPL’s 68 MW Cedar Ridge wind project in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin began generating electricity in 2008. WPL’s 200 MW Bent Tree - Phase I wind project in Freeborn County, Minnesota began full generatinggeneration of electricity in early 2011. TheseInternally generated electric supply from wind projects arefacilities generally represents less than 5% of Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s total sources of electric energy. All or some of the first fully owned and operated wind projects for IPL and WPL.renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be used in future years to comply with renewable energy standards or other regulatory requirements, or sold to third parties in the form of renewable energy credits or other environmental commodities.

Purchased Power - IPL and WPL enter into PPAs and purchase electricity from wholesale energy markets to meet a portion of their customer demand for electricity. Purchased power represented almostapproximately 40% to 45% of Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s total sources of electric energy in 2010.2011. IPL’s most significant PPA is with NextEra Energy, Inc. for the purchase of energy and capacity from DAECthe Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) through February 2014. IPL currently believes it is unlikely that it will enter into any long-term agreement with NextEra Energy, Inc. for the purchase of electricity generated by DAEC beyond the current DAEC PPA term. WPL’s most significant PPAs are with Dominion Resources, Inc. for the purchase of energy and capacity from the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (Kewaunee) through December 2013 and with a subsidiary of Calpine Corporation for the purchase of energy and capacity from Riverside through May 2013. WPL currently believes it is unlikely that it will enter into any long-term agreement with Dominion Resources, Inc. for the purchase of electricity generated by Kewaunee beyond the current Kewaunee PPA term. WPL currently anticipates it will acquire Riverside in late 2012 to replace the electricity output currently obtained from Riverside beyond the current Riverside PPA term.

Refer to Note 1(h) for discussion of IPL’s and WPL’s rate recovery of electric production fuel and purchased energy costs, Note 3(a) for details regarding PPAs accounted for as operating leases and Note 12(b)13(a) for details on IPL’s and WPL’s coal, natural gas and other purchased power commitments in the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Electric Transmission-

IPL - IPL completed the sale of its electric transmission assets located in Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois to ITC in 2007. IPL sold its electric transmission assets in order to monetize the value of the assets to help fund future capital expenditures, to capture tax benefits under federal tax policy that allowed deferral of gains on sales of qualifying electric transmission assets completed prior to Jan. 1, 2008 (based on regulations at the time of the sale) and to promote regional transmission expansion that is expected to improve transmission reliability and access for its customers in Iowa and Minnesota. ITC is an independent for-profit, transmission-only company and is a transmission-owning member of the MISO RTO, MRO and Reliability First Corporation Regional Entities. ITC has transmission interconnections at various locations with other transmission owning utilities in the Midwest. These interconnections enhance the overall reliability of the IPL delivery system and provide access to multiple sources of economic and emergency energy. IPL currently receives substantially all its transmission services from ITC. The annual transmission service rates that ITC charge its customers is calculated each calendar year using a FERC-approved cost of service formula rate template referred to as Attachment “O.” Refer to “Other Matters - Other Future Considerations - Electric Transmission Service Charges” in MDA for additional information

regarding transmission servicesservice charges from ITC. Refer to “Rate Matters - Recent Retail Base Rate Filings - IPL’s Iowa Retail Electric Rate Case (2009 Test Year)” for discussion of a new transmission cost rider for recovery of electric transmission service expenses approved by the IUB in January 2011.

WPL - WPL transferred its transmission assets to ATC in 2001 in exchange for an ownership interest in ATC. As of Dec. 31, 2010,2011, WPL held a 16% ownership interest in ATC with a carrying value of $228$239 million. WPL currently anticipates making capital contributions of $5$7 million, $5$4 million and $2 million to ATC in 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2013,2014, respectively, to maintain its current ownership percentage. During 2010,2011, ATC distributed to WPL, in the form of dividends, $31 million or approximately 80%82% of WPL’s equity earnings from ATC. Although no assurance can be given, WPL anticipates ATC will continue thisa dividend payout ratio close to this level in the future. ATC is an independent for-profit, transmission-only company and is a transmission-owning member of the MISO RTO, MRO and Reliability First Corporation Regional Entities. ATC has transmission interconnections with various other transmission owning utilities in the Midwest. These interconnections enhance the overall reliability of the WPL delivery system and provide access to multiple sources of economic and emergency energy. WPL currently receives substantially all its transmission services from ATC. Refer to Note 2021 of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for details of agreements between ATC and WPL.

MISO Markets - IPL and WPL are members of MISO, a FERC-approved RTO, which is responsible for monitoring and ensuring equal access to the transmission system in their service territories. IPL and WPL participate in the wholesale energy market and ancillary services markets operated by MISO, which are discussed in more detail below. IPL and WPL are parties to a system coordination and operating agreement whereby Corporate Services serves as agent on behalf of IPL and WPL. The agreement, which has been approved or reviewed by FERC and all state regulatory bodies having jurisdiction, provides a contractual basis for coordinated planning, construction, operation and maintenance of the interconnected electric generation systems of IPL and WPL. As agent of the agreement, Corporate Services enters into energy, capacity, ancillary services, and transmission service sale and purchase transactions. Corporate Services allocates such sales and purchases among IPL and WPL based on information provided by MISO and procedures included in the agreement. The procedures were approved by FERC and all state regulatory bodies having jurisdiction. Refer to Note 2021 of the “Notes“Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional discussion of these allocated amounts.

Wholesale Energy Market -IPL and WPL began participation in the wholesale energy market operated by MISO in 2005. The market impacts the way IPL and WPL buy and sell wholesale electricity, obtain transmission services, schedule generation and ensure resource adequacy to reliably serve load. In the market, IPL and WPL submit day-ahead and/or real-time bids and offers for energy at locations across the MISO region. MISO evaluates IPL’s, WPL’s and other market participants’ offers, bids and energy injections into, and withdrawals from, the system to economically dispatch the entire MISO system on an hourly basis. MISO settles these hourly offers and bids based on locational marginal prices, which are market-driven values based on the specific time and location of the purchase and/or sale of energy. The market is intended to send price signals to stakeholders about where generation or transmission system expansion is needed. This market-based approach is expected to result in lower overall costs in areas with abundant transmission capacity. In addition, MISO may dispatch generators that support reliability needs, but that would not have operated based on economic needs. In these cases, MISO’s settlement assures that these generators are made whole financially for their variable costs. IPL and WPL also periodically engage in related transactions in PJM’s bid/offer-based wholesale energy market, which are accounted for in a similar tomanner as the MISO transactions.

Financial Transmission Rights (FTRs) and Auction Revenue Rights (ARRs) - In areas of constrained transmission capacity, such as Wisconsin, costs could be higher due to congestion and their impact on locational marginal prices. As part of the MISO market restructuring in 2005, physical transmission rights of IPL and WPL were replaced with FTRs. FTRs provide a hedge for congestion costs that occur in the MISO day-ahead energy market. Both IPL and WPL are allocated ARRs from MISO each year based on historical use of the transmission system. The revenue rights associated with these ARRs are used by IPL and WPL to acquire FTRs through the FTR auctions operated by MISO. IPL’s and WPL’s current FTRs acquired from ARRs extend through May 31, 2011.2012. MISO re-allocates ARRs annually based on a fiscal year from June 1 through May 31. Based on the FTRs awarded to IPL and WPL to-date and future expected allocations of ARRs, along with the expected regulatory recovery treatment of MISO costs, the financial impacts associated with FTRs have not differed significantly from the financial impacts associated with physical transmission rights that existed prior to the MISO wholesale energy market.

Ancillary Services Market - In 2009, MISO launched an ancillary services market, which integrates the procurement and use of regulation and contingency reserves with the existing wholesale energy market implemented in 2005. Regulation refersreserves refer to generation available to meet the moment-to-moment changes in generation that are necessary to meet changes in electricity demand. Contingency reserves refer to additional generation or demand response resources, either on-line or that can be brought on-

lineon-line within 10 minutes, to meet certain major events such as the loss of a large generating unit or transmission line. MISO plans to address refinements to its ancillary services market in 2011.

MISO and PJM Market Flow Corrections - In 2009, MISO and PJM disclosed an error in the calculation of market flow data between the two independent system operators that began in 2005. The error resulted in incorrect payments between MISO and PJM during 2005 through 2009. Because IPL and WPL participated in both the MISO and PJM markets during the period of the error, IPL and WPL may have been entitled to refunds or may have been required to make additional payments to the two independent system operators.MISO and/or PJM. In 2010, MISO and PJM filed complaints against each other with FERC. In January 2011, MISO and PJM filed a settlement, which is pending finalwas approved by FERC approval.in June 2011. Under the proposed settlement, payments wouldwere not be exchanged between MISO and PJM.PJM, resulting in no direct financial impact to Alliant Energy, IPL or WPL. Instead, process changes would bewere established, including a baseline review of market-to-market processes and accounting, establishment of a change management process regarding the same biennial review of process changes, and enhanced access to pertinent data enabling independent verification of calculations related to settlements. Future market-to-market billing adjustment claims would beare limited to one year before the error is discovered compared to the currentprevious two-year limitation.

Electric Environmental Matters -Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations issued byat a federal, state and local agencies. Such regulations arelevel relating to the resultprotection of a numberthe environment and health and safety matters, including those governing air emissions; water discharges; the management, storage and disposal of environmental laws passed byhazardous materials and the U.S. Congress, state legislatures and local governments and enforced by federal, state and local regulatory agencies.clean-up of contaminated sites. The laws impacting Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s electric operations include, but are not limited to, the Safe Drinking Water Act; Clean Water Act; Clean Air Act (CAA);Act; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; Toxic Substances Control Act; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986; Endangered Species Act; Occupational Safety and Health Act; National Energy Policy Act, as amended; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act; Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; Pollution Prevention Act; and Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act.Act, as well as similar state laws, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL regularly obtain federal, state and local permits to assure compliance with environmental protection laws and regulations. Costs associated with such compliance have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the future. Alliant Energy, IPL and WPL anticipate thesethat prudently incurred compliance and remediation costs for IPL and WPL will be recoverable, in whole or part, through future rate case proceedings. Refer to “Environmental Matters” in MDA and Note 12(e)13(d) of the “Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further discussion of electric environmental matters, including current or proposed environmental regulations under the Clean Air Interstate Rule, Proposed CleanCross-State Air TransportPollution Rule, Clean Air Visibility Rule, Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Rule, Wisconsin State Mercury Rule, Wisconsin Reasonably Available Control Technology Rule, Industrial Boiler and Process Heater MACT Rule, Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Rule, Fine Particle NAAQS Rule, Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS Rule, SO2 NAAQS Rule, Industrial Boiler and Process Heater MACT Rule, Emission Standards for Internal Combustion Engines, Federal Clean Water Act including Section 316(b), Wisconsin and Iowa State Thermal Rule,Rules, Hydroelectric Fish Passages and Fish Protective Devices, Coal Combustion Residuals, Closed Ash Landfills, Polychlorinated Biphenyls and various legislation and EPA regulations to monitor and regulate the emission of GHGGreenhouse Gases (GHG) including the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, the New Source Performance Standard for GHG Emissions from Electric Utilities and the GHG Tailoring Rule. Refer to “Strategic Overview - Environmental Compliance Plans” in MDA for details of Alliant Energy’s, IPL’s and WPL’s future environmental compliance plans to adhere to applicable environmental regulations.requirements.

Alliant Energy Corporation

Interstate Power and Light Company