UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20102013

Commission No. 333-128166-10

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 34-2022081

1101 Technology Drive

Ann Arbor, MI 48108

(734) 827-5400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

(Note: As a voluntary filer not subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant would have been required to file such reports) as if it were subject to such filing requirements).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated Filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There were 1,000 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 11, 201131, 2014 (all of which are privately owned and not traded on a public market).

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page 
PART I.  PART I.

Item 1.

 Business   1  
 OurThe Company   1  
 History and OwnershipFiltration Segment   2  
 OverviewAffinia South America Segment   4  
 Sales by RegionDiscontinued Operations   5  
 AcquisitionsHistory and Ownership   5  
 RestructuringSales by Region5
Our Industry   6  
 Our IndustryCustomer Support   67  
 ProductsIntellectual Property7
Raw Materials and Manufactured Components   8  
 Sales Channels and CustomersSeasonality   98  
 Customer SupportBacklog   98  
 Intellectual PropertyResearch and Development Activities   108  
 Raw Materials and Manufactured ComponentsCompetition   108  
 SeasonalityEmployees   108  
 BacklogEnvironmental Matters   108  
 Research and Development ActivitiesInternet Availability   10
Competition10
Employees11
Environmental Matters11
Internet Availability119  

Item 1A.

 Risk Factors   1110  

Item 1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments   2019  

Item 2.

 Properties   2019  

Item 3.

 Legal Proceedings   20  

Item 4.

 Removed and ReservedMine Safety Disclosures   2120  
PART II.  

Item 5.

 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Shares   2120  

Item 6.

 Selected Consolidated and Combined Financial Data   2120  

Item 7.

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations22
Company Overview22
Strategic Focus   23  
 Company OverviewNature of Business23
Transformation   24  
 Restructuring ActivitiesBusiness Environment24
Results of Operations   25  
 Strategic Focus27
Acquisitions and New Technology27
Disposition27
Amendment to ABL Revolver28
Issuance of Senior Subordinated Notes28
Redemption of Secured Notes28
Nature of Business28
Business Environment28
Results of Operationsby Geographic Region   30  
 Liquidity and Capital Resources31
Cash Flows   35  
 Contractual Obligations and Commitments37
Commitments and Contingencies   38  
 Commitments and ContingenciesCritical Accounting Estimates   38  
 CriticalNew Accounting EstimatesPronouncements   38
Recent Accounting Pronouncements4140  

Item 7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   41  

 

i


     Page 

Item 8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   43  

Item 9.

 Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   8889  

Item 9A.

 Controls and Procedures   8889  

Item 9B.

 Other Information   8889  
PART III.  

Item 10.

 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance   8990  

Item 11.

 Executive Compensation   9394  

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   111112  

Item 13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence   114115  

Item 14.

 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees   116117  
PART IV.  

Item 15.

 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules   116118  

 

ii


Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenue or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, business trends and other information that is not historical information. When used in this report, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” or future or conditional verbs, such as “could” “may,” “should,” or “will,” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and data are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there is no assurance that these expectations, beliefs and projections will be achieved. With respect to all forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others, continued volatility indomestic and disruption to the global economyeconomic conditions and the resulting impact on the availability and cost of credit; financial viability of key customers and key suppliers; our dependence on our largest customers; increased crude oil and gasoline prices and resulting reductions in global demand for the use of automobiles; the shift in demand from premium to economy products; pricing and pressures from imports; increasing costs for manufactured components;components, raw materials and energy; the expansion of return policies or the extension of payment terms; risks associated with our non-U.S. operations; risks related to our receivables factoring arrangements; product liability and warranty and recall claims;claims brought against us; reduced inventory levels by our distributors resulting from consolidation and increased efficiency; environmental and automotive safety regulations; the availability of raw materials, manufactured components or equipment from our suppliers; challenges to our intellectual property portfolio; our ability to develop improved products; the introduction of improved products and services that extend replacement cycles otherwise reduce demand for our products; our ability to achieve cost savings from our restructuring plans; work stoppages, labor disputes or similar difficulties that could significantly disrupt our operations;ability to successfully effect dispositions of existing lines of business; our ability to successfully combine our operations with any businesses we have acquired or may acquire; risk of impairment charges to our long-lived assets; risk of impairment to intangibles and goodwill; the risk of business disruptions;disruptions related to a variety of events or conditions including natural and man-made disasters; risks associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with our expansion into new markets; risks associated with increased levels of drug-related violence in Juarez, Mexico; the impact on our tax rate resulting from the mix of our profits and losses in various jurisdictions; reductions in the value of our deferred tax assets; difficulties in developing, maintaining or upgrading information technology systems; risks associated with doing business in corrupting environments; our ability to effectively transition our corporate office to our Filtration segment headquarters; our ability to complete the sale our Chassis group; and our substantial leverage and limitations on flexibility in operating our business contained in our debt agreements. Additionally, there may be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.

 

iii


PART I.

 

Item 1.Business

OurThe Company

We areAffinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. (“Affinia”) is a global leader in the lightmanufacturing and commercial vehicledistribution of global filtration products (“Filtration segment”) and replacement products in South America (“Affinia South America segment”). We operate in the Filtration and services industry, which also is referred to as the aftermarket. Our extensive aftermarket product offering consists principally of filtration, brakeAffinia South America operating segments. The Filtration segment, Affinia’s largest, manufactures and chassis products. Ourdistributes filtration products fit heavyfor medium and mediumheavy-duty trucks, construction, agriculture, mining, and forestry vehicles, and light duty, trucks, light vehicles, equipment in the off-highway market (i.e., construction, mining, forestry and agricultural) and equipment for industrial, and marine applications. Our brake and chassis products fit light vehicles and heavy and medium duty trucks. In addition, we provide aftermarket products and distribution services in South America. We believe that the growth of the global aftermarket, from which we derived approximately 98% of our net sales in 2010, is predominantly driven by the size, age and use of the population of vehicles and equipment in operation. We design, manufacture, distribute and market a broad range of aftermarket products in North America,The Affinia South America Europe, Asiasegment manufactures and Africadistributes replacement products for on-road and generate salesoff-road vehicles, principally in over 70 countries.Brazil. Based on managementmanagement’s estimates and certain information from third parties, we believeManagement believes that we hold for the year ended 2013, Affinia holds:

the #1 market position in North AmericanAmerica for aftermarket filtration and brake products and

the #2 market positionsposition in North American aftermarket chassis products and Brazilian aftermarket parts distribution by

Affinia’s continuing net sales for 2013 were approximately $1.4 billion. The following charts illustrate Affinia’s net sales by geography and segment for continuing operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.2013.

Our aftermarket products can be classified into two primary groups:

We have successfully entered new markets in Europe and in Central and South America and have grown existing market share in North America, South America and Europe. Additionally, our Affinia South America segment has grown significantly over the past several years. The following chart illustrates the sales growth of Affinia’s continuing operations since our inception.

 

(1)Routine maintenance products, such as oil, fuel, air and other filters. The regular replacement cycle for these types of products provides a stable and recurring revenue stream. For example, we estimate that the oil filter will be replaced on an average heavy duty truck eight to ten times each year and on a typical light duty vehicle three to four times each year.

(2)Wear products that are designed to be replaced occasionally, such as brake and chassis products (e.g., pads, rotors, shoes, drums, shock absorbers, steering and other suspension products). For example, brake pads will be replaced multiple times over the life of a light vehicle and more frequently over the life of a typical severe use or heavy duty truck.

Contributing to our growth is our long-standing relationship with leading commercial vehicle and automotive parts retailers and wholesale distributors. We have supplied the automotive aftermarket industry for over 70 years and we have supplied our largest customer, NAPA, for over 40 years. We believe that theseemphasis on our customer service, coupled with the breadth of our product offerings, are the most attractive product groupskey factors in maintaining our leading market positions.

Filtration Segment

The Filtration segment is one of the world’s leading designers, manufacturers, marketers, and distributors of a broad range of filtration replacement products . Our filtration business includes manufacturing operations in the U.S., Mexico, Europe, South America and China. It benefits from industry-leading brands, long-standing customer relationships and a global low-cost manufacturing and distribution footprint, along with the all-makes / all-models product line of oil, air, fuel, cabin air, coolant, hydraulic and other filters. For further information about our Filtration segment, refer to “Note 18. Segment Information,” which is included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The Filtration segment products are used in on-road and off-road vehicles, in addition to various industrial, locomotive, and marine applications. The numerous strengths of the Filtration segment have led to a #1 market position in the North America aftermarket givenand a leading market position in the higher frequency of replacement for filtersEastern Europe aftermarket. The following charts illustrate the historical sales growth, heavy duty and brake productslight duty product mix and the historicalsales by geographical location.

Approximately half of the Filtration segment sales are in heavy-duty products. The Filtration segment is among the leading global manufacturers and expected growthdistributors of aftermarket filters for heavy-duty and off-highway applications, including on-highway trucks, residential and non-residential construction equipment, agricultural, mining, forestry and industrial equipment, severe service vehicles, medium-duty vehicles and marine applications. With over 70 years of experience, Filtration’s heavy-duty filters are designed to withstand harsh elements and provide for optimal filtration and engine protection in these product groups dueless-than-optimal work environments.

Filtration’s full line of heavy-duty products is a key differentiator versus its light duty filtration competitors. In contrast to increasing regulatory and consumer focus on the environmental and safety benefitsmost light duty competitors, we are able to provide customers with a full suite of these products. Ourfiltration options. Customers, particularly distributors, derive value from having a one-stop-shop supplier that is capable of providing products for a diverse range of end markets. Furthermore, heavy-duty filtration products are generally more technologically advanced and systems are critical to the efficient operations of the enginethus typically priced higher than similar light duty products.

The Filtration segment’s automotive and passenger air quality, while our brake and chassislight truck products are essentialat the forefront of filter technology and performance. It’s portfolio of premium line and value line products is designed to exceed performance demands for the safetya variety of the vehicle.applications, including passenger vehicles, sport utility vehicles, motorcycles and ATVs.

We market our Filtration products under a variety of well-known brands, including WIX®, RaybestosFiltron™ and ecoLAST®, Nakata®, Brake-Pro®, Filtron™, AIMCO® and McQuay-Norris®. Additionally, we provide private label products to large aftermarket distributors, including NAPA®, CARQUEST® and ACDelco®, as well as co-branded products for Federated and ADN.. We believe that we havethe Filtration segment has achieved ourits leading market positions due to the quality and reputation of ourits brands and products among professional installers, who are the primary decision makers for the purchase of the products that we supply to the aftermarket. Professional installers are highly incentivized to order reliable, well-known aftermarket products when repairing a vehicle because the cost of the products is passed through to the end consumer and, once the repair is made, installers are expected to stand behind their work by replacing any malfunctioning products without charging for the replacement or for the additional labor required. We believe that the reputation of our brands and products for form, fit, function and quality promotes significant demand for our products from these installers and throughout the aftermarket supply chain. Our reputation for reliability has helped us penetrate retailers whose customers have become increasingly sophisticated about the quality of the products they install in their vehicles.

In addition to servicing the

Filtration Products

Our Filtration segment product lines include oil, air, fuel, hydraulic and other filters for light, vehicle population, we sell to medium and heavy duty on and off-highway vehicle, industrial and marine applications. The following chart illustrates the major categories of filter products.

*Other consists of cabin air, industrial, hydraulic, coolant, small engine, test kits, gaskets, compressed air and spare products

The following summarizes a few of our key filter products:

Oil Filters

An oil filter traps particles and dirt that might otherwise damage the bearings and rings of a vehicle’s engine. A build-up of particles inside an oil filter can also slow oil flow to the bearings, camshaft and upper valve train components and allow unfiltered oil, possibly containing contaminants, to enter the oil stream and cause accelerated wear on the engine.

Air Filters

A vehicle’s air filter traps particles that could otherwise reduce engine performance. A clogged air filter may restrict air flow into the engine, resulting to a shift away from the optimum air to fuel ratio for combustion, and thus reducing gas mileage.

Fuel Filters

A vehicle’s fuel filter prevents sediment and rust particles sized three microns or larger from entering and blocking the fuel injector. A clogged fuel filter may restrict fuel flow to the engine, resulting in a loss of fuel pressure and horsepower.

Filtration Sales Channels and Customers

Our extensive filter product offering fits nearly every car, truck, fleetsoff-highway and repair facilities through manyagricultural make and model on the road, allowing us to serve as a full line supplier to our customers for our product categories. These customers primarily comprise large aftermarket distributors and retailers selling to professional technicians or installers. Our customer base also includes original equipment service (“OES”) participants such as ACDelco. Many of our customers such asare leading aftermarket participants, including NAPA, CARQUEST, Aftermarket Auto Parts Alliance (“the AllianceAlliance”), Uni-Select Inc. and other independent warehouse distributors. We also serveO’Reilly Auto Parts. As an active participant in the off-highway market throughaftermarket for more than 60 years, we have many long-standing customer relationships.

Approximately 22% and 6% of our large2013 net sales from continuing operations were derived from our two largest customers, NAPA and have successfully developed products for new non-vehicle related opportunities in stationary equipmentCARQUEST, respectively. See “Risk Factors—Our business would be materially and wind generation applications.

adversely affected if we lost any of our larger customers.”

Our principal product areas are described below:The following table provides a description of the primary sales channels to which we supply our products:

 

Product AreaPrimary Sales Channels

  

Representative BrandsDescription

  

Product DescriptionCustomers

FiltrationWIX, FILTRON, NAPA, CARQUEST and ecoLASTOil, air, fuel, hydraulic and other filters for light, medium and heavy duty on and off-highway vehicle, industrial and marine applications
BrakesTraditional  Raybestos, BrakePro, AIMCO, NAPA, CARQUESTWarehouses and ACDelcodistribution centers that supply local distribution outlets, which sell to professional installers.  Drums, rotors, calipers, frictionNAPA, CARQUEST, the Alliance and hydraulic componentsUni-Select
Distribution – South AmericaRetail  Nakata, BoschRetail stores, including national chains that sell replacement parts directly to consumers (the DIY market) and WIXto some professional installers.  Steering, shock absorbersO’Reilly Auto Parts and other suspension and driveline components, brakes, fuel and water pumps and other aftermarket productsAutoZone
ChassisOES  

Raybestos, Nakata, NAPA

Chassis, McQuay-NorrisVehicle manufacturers and

ACDelco

service departments at vehicle dealerships.
  Steering, suspensionACDelco, Robert Bosch, TRW Automotive and driveline componentsChrysler

The traditional channel is important to us because it is the primary source of products for professional installers. We believe that the quality and reputation of our brands for form, fit, and function promotes significant demand for our products from these installers and throughout the aftermarket supply chain. We have many long-standing relationships with leading distributors in the traditional channel such as NAPA and CARQUEST, for whom we have manufactured products for approximately 40 and 20 years, respectively.

As retailers become increasingly focused on consolidating their supplier base, we believe that our broad product offering, product quality, sales and marketing support and customer service capabilities make us more valuable to these customers.

Affinia South America Segment

Our net sales for 2010 were approximately $2.0 billion.Affinia South America segment is a market leader in the distribution and manufacturing of replacement products throughout South America. The following charts illustrate our net salessegment focuses on distributing and manufacturing products through its operations in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Venezuela. The Affinia South America segment consists of two major operating units: Pellegrino and Automotiva South America (“Automotiva”). The two units are strategically aligned and are operated by geography and product type for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, excluding our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit, which we sold on February 2, 2010.same management team. For further information about our segments and our sales by geographic region,Affinia South America segment, refer to “Note 21.18. Segment Information,” which is included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The following charts show the growth of the Affinia South America segment in U.S. dollars and sales by geography.

Automotiva manufactures shock absorbers in Brazil, brake fluids, antifreeze, and coolants in Argentina, and brake pads and blocks in Uruguay. Automotiva also acts as a master distributor in Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela. In addition to direct manufacturing, Automotiva is a leader in the supply of chassis components and driveshaft products, assembling, packaging and branding various components from third-party manufacturers. Automotiva’s manufactured and outsourced products are shipped to warehouse distributors both in Brazil and internationally. Pellegrino is Automotiva’s largest customer. In addition, Automotiva exports to Argentina and to 28 other countries around the world. It has a market leading position in a number of products including CV Joints, rear axle sets, chassis parts, universal joint kits, shock absorbers, fuel pumps, and oil pumps. Products are sold under the Nakata®, Spicer® and Power Engine® names.

Pellegrino is a warehouse distributor that sources products from master distributors and other sources including Automotiva, TRW, Bosch, Philips and Mahle. The product portfolio is composed of leading brands for light and heavy-duty vehicles, motorcycle parts and accessories. Pellegrino sells these products to over 22,000 customers including jobber stores, fleets, and independent repair shops in Brazil. Pellegrino has recently expanded its light duty and heavy-duty product offering to include motorcycle and automotive electronics (e.g. GPS systems, speakers). Pellegrino uses its 20 warehouse locations with over 360,000 square feet of warehouse space to service customers in the northeast, midwest, and southern portions of Brazil. Management believes that Pellegrino’s geographic presence and robust product offering have led it to a #2 market share among warehouse distributors in Brazil.

Affinia South America products

We manufacture and/or distribute products in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Venezuela, including fuel and water pumps, universal joint kits, axle sets, shocks, steering, filtration products, CV joints, brake products, suspension parts, motorcycle parts, electronics and other aftermarket products.

Affinia South America Sales Channel and Customers

Automotiva’s products are sold to warehouse distributors, which includes Pellegrino, within Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela and internationally. Pellegrino, a warehouse distributor, sells the majority of its products to retailers and jobber stores, with the balance sold to parties such as auto centers, diesel injection centers, motorcycle retailers, heavy-duty fleets and engine rebuilders. Pellegrino and Automotiva do not distribute to installers or end-consumers.

Discontinued Operations

In addition to our Filtration and Affinia South America segments we have a Chassis group, which manufactures and distributes a broad range of chassis products for the aftermarket. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we made the decision to engage in a plan to sell our Chassis group. An agreement was signed in January 2014 to divest our Chassis operations and the group qualified as discontinued operations (refer to Note 3. Discontinued Operation—Chassis).

History and Ownership

The registrant is a Delaware corporation formed on October 18, 2004 and controlled by affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C. (“Cypress”). The registrant’s direct wholly-owned subsidiary Affinia Group Inc., a Delaware corporation formed on June 28, 2004, entered into a stock and asset purchase agreement, as amended (the “Purchase Agreement”), with Dana Corporation (“Dana”) on July 8, 2004. The Purchase Agreement provided for the acquisition by Affinia Group Inc. of substantially all of Dana’s aftermarket business operations (the “Acquisition”). The Acquisition was completed on November 30, 2004, for a purchase price of $1.0 billion.2004.

All references in this report to “Affinia,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” mean, unless the context indicates otherwise, Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

As a result of the Acquisition, investment funds controlled by Cypress hold approximately 61% of the common stock of our parent, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”), which directly owns 100% of our common stock, and therefore Cypress controls us. The other principal investors in Holdings are the following: OMERS Administration Corporation (formerly known as Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board), California State Teachers Retirement System, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Stockwell Capital.

On December 15, 2005, Holdings, our parent company, entered into stockholder and other agreements with certain officers, directors and key employees (collectively, the “Executives”) of the Company, pursuant to which those Executives purchased an aggregate of 9,520 shares of Holdings common stock for $100 per Share in cash. Holdings received aggregate proceeds of $952,000 as a result of the offering, which was made pursuant to the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (“2005 Stock Plan”). Since 2005, Holdings has re-purchased some of those shares and has issued a small amount of additional shares (including pursuant to our deferred compensation program), and a shareholder ceased to be an Executive of the Company, as a result of which there were 5,46314,106 shares of Holdings common stock held by Executives outstanding as of December 31, 20102013 (excluding shares that may be issued pursuant to our non-qualified deferred compensation plan).

We have divested three groups since 2010. On October 30, 2008, Holdings authorized 9.5% Class A Convertible preferred stock, with an initial issuance price of $1,000 per share, consisting of 150,000 shares. Holdings issued 51,475 shares of its preferred stock on October 31, 2008 to its investors and certainFebruary 2, 2010, as part of our executives. Asstrategic plan, we sold our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit. Our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit, also known as Quinton Hazell, was a diverse aftermarket manufacturer and distributor of December 31, 2010 there were 51,450 sharesautomotive components throughout Europe. On November 30, 2012, we distributed our Brake North America and Asia group to the shareholders of Holdings, preferred stock outstanding (excluding accrued dividends).

Ownership Structure

(1)On August 13, 2009, Affinia Group Inc. issued $225 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 (“Secured Notes”). The Secured Notes were offered at a price of 98.799% of their face value, resulting in $222 million of net proceeds. The discount, which is $2 million as of December 31, 2010, is being amortized based on the effective interest rate method and included in interest expense until the Secured Notes mature. The Secured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and certain of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. On December 1, 2010, Affinia Group Inc. issued an irrevocable notice of redemption to redeem $22.5 million aggregate principal amount of the Secured Notes on December 31, 2010, pursuant to their terms at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount of such notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. As of December 31, 2010, $200 million of the Secured Notes were outstanding net of a $2 million discount.
(2)Our asset-based revolving credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $315 million (the “ABL Revolver”). The Canadian Dollar equivalent of up to $20 million U.S. Dollars of the ABL Revolver can be made available, subject to certain collateral obligations, for borrowings by a Canadian subsidiary. As of December 31, 2010, we had $90 million of outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver, and approximately $191 million was available for borrowings under the ABL Revolver after giving effect to $15 million of outstanding and undrawn letters of credit and $3 million of borrowing base reserves, which reduce available borrowings.
(3)On November 30, 2004, Affinia Group Inc. issued $300 million in aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (“Subordinated Notes”). The Subordinated Notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and certain of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. During the second quarter of 2009, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. purchased approximately $33 million principal amount of the Subordinated Notes in the open market and thereafter contributed such notes to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., which contributed such notes to Affinia Group Inc. Affinia Group Inc. promptly surrendered such notes for cancellation. On December 9, 2010, we completed an offering of an additional $100 million aggregate principal amount of Subordinated Notes (the “Additional Notes”). As of December  31, 2010, $367 million in aggregate principal amount of the Subordinated Notes was outstanding.

Overview

Our extensive product offering fits nearly every car, truck, off-highwaythe Company’s parent company and agricultural makesole stockholder, and modelit was subsequently sold on March 25, 2013 to a new investor. In December 2013, we made the road, allowing usdecision to serve asengage in a full line supplierplan to sell our customers forChassis group. An agreement was signed in January 2014 to divest our product categories. These customers primarily comprise large aftermarket distributors and retailers selling to professional technicians or installers. Our customer base also includes original equipment service (“OES”) participants such as ACDelco. Many of our customers are leading aftermarket companies, including NAPA, CARQUEST, Aftermarket Auto Parts Alliance (“the Alliance”), Uni-Select Inc., O’Reilly Auto Parts, and Federated Auto Parts. As an active participant in the aftermarket for more than 60 years, we have many long-standing customer relationships.

We derived approximately 98% of our 2010 net sales from the on and off-highway replacement products and services industry, which is also referred to as the aftermarket. We believe that the aftermarket will continue to grow as a result of the increase in the light vehicle populationChassis operations and the average age of light vehicles. Accordinggroup qualified as discontinued operations (refer to the Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association (“AAIA”), the U.S. aftermarket decreased by 2.4% during 2009. In 2010, the industry was forecasted to increase by 3.8% and continue in 2011 with 3.4% growth.Note 3. Discontinued Operation—Chassis).

Sales by Region

Our broad range of brake, chassisfiltration and filtrationother products are primarily sold in North America, Europe, South America and South America.Asia. We are also focusing on expanding manufacturing capabilities globally to position us to take advantage of global growth opportunities. With our current operations in China and India and two additional facilities being constructed in China we believe we are well positioned in Asia. In the future we plan to sell our broad product offering in China and other Asian markets. The percentage of sales by geographic region has changed over the last five years as outlined in the chart below. For information about our segments and our sales by geographic region, refer to “Note 21.18. Segment Information,” which is included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Excluded from the charts is our Commercial Distribution Europe segment which is classified as a discontinued operation and was sold on February 2, 2010 (refer to Note 4 Discontinued Operation, which is included in Item 8 of this report).

Acquisitions

On December 16, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiary Affinia Products Corp LLC, acquired substantially all the assets of North American Parts Distributors, Inc. (“NAPD”), which is located in Ramsey, New Jersey. NAPD designs and engineers chassis products, which are manufactured by contractors in low labor cost countries. The NAPD acquisition expands our product offering of chassis parts to one of the broadest in the industry. We acquired NAPD’s assets and liabilities for cash consideration of $52 million, subject to an adjustment based on the difference between targeted working capital and actual working capital at the closing date. We accounted for this acquisition under the purchase method of accounting and the results of operations are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. This acquisition was considered immaterial for disclosure of supplemental pro forma information and revenues and earnings of the acquiree since the acquisition date. We financed this acquisition with available borrowings under our ABL Revolver, which borrowings were repaid with the proceeds from our completed offering on December 9, 2010 of the Additional Notes.

In December 2010, the Company acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest in Affinia India Private Limited (formerly known as Affinia MAT India Braking Private Limited), the Company’s India joint venture, for $24 million in cash, increasing our ownership interest from 50% to 100%. The acquisition was not subject to any post closing purchase price adjustments or earn-outs. We had a controlling financial interest in Affinia India Private Limited prior to the purchase of the remaining 50% interest. Since we had control prior to the purchase, we accounted for the transaction as an equity transaction consistent with ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation.” We financed this acquisition with available borrowings under our ABL Revolver, which borrowings were repaid with proceeds from our completed offering on December 9, 2010 of the Additional Notes.

Restructuring

Comprehensive Restructuring

In 2005, we announced two restructuring plans: (i) a restructuring plan that we announced at the beginning of 2005 as part of the Acquisition, also referred to herein as the “acquisition restructuring” and (ii) a restructuring plan that we announced at the end of 2005, also referred to herein as the “comprehensive restructuring” (collectively, the “restructuring plans”). We have completed the acquisition restructuring and we are in the process of completing the comprehensive restructuring. We have closed 36 facilities during the last five years and have shifted some of our manufacturing base to lower labor cost countries such as China, India, Ukraine and Mexico.

In connection with the comprehensive restructuring, we modified our hydraulic product offering from a premium line and a value line to one distinct product offering that most resembles the value line in cost but the premium line in product attributes. In addition, for our drum and rotor product offering, we have retained the premium line but have expanded the coverage in our value line product offering. Lastly, for our friction product offerings we have reduced the product offerings from multiple lines to three product offerings. Even with the reduction in offerings we still retain what we believe is one of our key advantages over our competitors, which is a diverse product offering.

In connection with the comprehensive restructuring, we have recorded $167 million in restructuring costs to date and we expect to record an additional $4 million in restructuring costs for the remainder of the comprehensive restructuring.

Other Restructuring

At the end of 2009, we approved the closure of our distribution operations located in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. The operations closed at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The closure of this operation was part of the Company’s continuing effort to improve its distribution system and serve the replacement parts market effectively and efficiently. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of approximately $1 million and other trailing liabilities of approximately $4 million. We incurred approximately $4 million in 2010 and $1 million in 2009 related to the closure of this facility. We anticipate another $2 million in restructuring costs in 2011 related to the closure of the facility.

On May 3, 2010, we announced the closure of our brake manufacturing operations located in Maracay, Edo Aragua, Venezuela. The operations closed during the second quarter of 2010. We incurred pre-tax charges of approximately $7 million, of which approximately $4 million were cash expenditures. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of $3 million, asset impairments of $3 million, and other trailing liabilities of $1 million. We will still continue to distribute brake products in Venezuela, which we import from other low cost manufacturing sources. Our Venezuelan filter operation was unaffected by the closure of the brake manufacturing operation.

Our Industry

Statements regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding the performance of our business and other non-historical statements are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described under “Forward-Looking Statements.Statements” and “Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Item 6. Selected Consolidated and Combined Financial Data” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

We derived approximately 97% of our 2013 net sales from the on and off-highway replacement products and services industry, which is also referred to as the aftermarket. According to JD Power,AAIA, there were a total ofapproximately one billion light, medium and heavy dutyheavy-duty vehicles registered worldwide in 2009.2012. Approximately 259254 million, or 25%, of these vehicles were registered in the United States. According to the AAIA, the overall size of the U.S. aftermarket was approximately $274$307.7 billion in 2009. We are one2012. In addition, according to AAIA, the overall size of the largest independent participantsU.S. medium and heavy-duty aftermarket was approximately $76.5 billion in 2012 and is expected to grow by a CAGR of 3.4% from 2012 through 2016. According to the Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association (“AAIA”) 2014 Automotive Aftermarket Factbook, the U.S. motor vehicle aftermarket has increased by 3.5% during 2012. In 2013, the industry was forecasted to increase by 3.4% and to continue in 2014 with 3.3% growth.

We believe that the aftermarket will continue to grow as a result of the increase in the global aftermarket, based on our salesaverage age of light vehicles and the increase in over 70 countries and offer whatmiles driven. According to AAIA, in 2012 the average light vehicle age in the United States was 11.1 years, compared to an average of 9.6 years in 2002. As the average vehicle age continues to rise, we believe isthat the broadest line within our product categories. use of aftermarket products will generally increase as well. In the United States, the total miles driven rose from 2.29 trillion in 1993 to 2.97 trillion in 2013, an increase of approximately 30%. Since 1980, annual miles driven in the United States have increased every year except for 2008 and 2011, when the combination of a recession and high retail fuel prices curtailed driving habits. We expect miles driven in the United States to return to historic growth rates in the future.

To facilitate efficient inventory management and timely vehicle owner customer service, many of our customers and professional installers rely on larger suppliers like us to have full line product offerings, consistent value-added services and timely delivery. There are important advantages to having meaningful size and scale in the aftermarket, including the ability to support significant distribution operations, offer sophisticated supply chain management capabilities and provide a broad line of quality products.

In general, aftermarket industry participants can be categorized into three major groups: (1) manufacturers of parts, (2) distributors of replacement parts (without manufacturing capabilities) and (3) installers, both professional and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) customers. Distributors purchase products from manufacturers and sell them to wholesale or retail operations, which in turn sell them to installers.

The distribution business is comprised of the (1) traditional, (2) retail and (3) OES channels. channels as illustrated by the chart below.

Typically, professional installers purchase their products through the traditional channel, and DIY customers purchase products through the retail channel. The traditional channel includes such well-known distributors as NAPA, CARQUEST, Federated, the Alliance Uni-Select and ADN.Uni-Select. Through a network of distribution centers, these distributors sell primarily to owned or affiliated stores, which in turn supply professional installers. The retail channel includes merchants such as AutoZone, O’Reilly Auto Parts and Canadian Tire. The OES channel consists primarily of vehicle manufacturers’ service departments at new vehicle dealerships. The distribution business is illustrated by the chart below.

We believe that future growth in aftermarket product sales will be driven by the following key factors:

Growth in global vehicle population. JD Power estimates that the world’s total vehicle population in 2009 was approximately 1.0 billion and expects it to continue to grow at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 3.2% from 2009 to 2015. In particular, JD Power expects that the total vehicle populations of several key emerging markets will grow significantly over the next several years, as indicated by the forecasted CAGRs in vehicle population from 2009 to 2015 for the following geographic areas:

Brazil – 3.0%

China – 13.7%

Eastern Europe – 2.9%

India – 10.2%

Growth in global commercial vehicle population. JD Power estimates that there were approximately 170 million commercial vehicles registered globally in 2009 and expects the commercial vehicle population to continue to grow at a CAGR of 2.9% from 2009 to 2015. In particular, JD Power expects that the U.S. commercial vehicle population will grow at a CAGR of 1.4% from 2009 to 2015 and that the commercial vehicle populations of several key emerging markets will grow significantly over the next several years, as indicated by the forecasted CAGRs in commercial vehicle population from 2009 to 2015 for the following geographic areas:

Brazil – 4.1%

China – 6.5%

Eastern Europe – 3.6%

India – 5.5%

Increase in total miles driven in the United States. In the United States, the total miles driven rose from 2.15 trillion in 1990 to 3.00 trillion in 2010, an increase of approximately 40%. Since 1980, annual miles driven in the United States have increased every year except for 2008.

Increase in average age of light vehicles in the United States. As of 2009, the average light vehicle age in the United States was 10.2 years, compared to an average of 8.8 years in 1999. As the average light vehicle age continues to rise, we believe that the use of aftermarket products will generally increase as well.

Increase in vehicle related regulation and legislation. Increase in environmental and safety legislation that is being adopted on a global basis has led to an increase in demand for high value filtration and brake products.

Products

Our principal product areas are described below:

Product

  2010 Net  Sales
(Dollars
in Millions)
  Percent of
2010  Net
Sales
  Representative Brands  Product Description
Filtration products  $759    38 WIX, FILTRON, NAPA,
CARQUEST and ecoLAST
  Oil, fuel, air, hydraulic and

other filters for light-,
medium- and heavy-duty on
and off-highway vehicle
applications

Brake North America & Asia
products

   633    32 Raybestos, NAPA, CARQUEST,

BrakePro, AIMCO and ACDelco

  Drums, rotors, calipers, pads
and shoes and hydraulic
components

Commercial Distribution South
America products

   430    22 Nakata and WIX  Steering, suspension, driveline
components, brakes, fuel and
water pumps and other
aftermarket products

Chassis products

   169    8 Raybestos Chassis, NAPA

Chassis, McQuay-Norris,

ACDelco and Nakata

  Steering, suspension and
driveline components
            

Total On and Off-Highway
segment

   1,991    100   

Brake South America products

   15    1   

Corporate, Eliminations and other

   (15  (1)%    
         

Net sales of continuing operations

   1,991      
         

Filtration Products. We are a leading designer, manufacturer, marketer and distributor of a broad range of filtration products for the aftermarket and we are one of the few aftermarket suppliers of both heavy duty and light duty filters. Our filtration business includes manufacturing operations in Europe and South America. Our filtration product lines include oil, air, fuel, hydraulic and other filters for light, medium and heavy duty on and off-highway vehicle, industrial and marine applications.

Brake Products. We are a leading designer, manufacturer, marketer and distributor of a broad range of brake products for the aftermarket. We have an extensive offering of high quality, premium brake products. Our brake products include master cylinders, wheel cylinders, hardware and hydraulics, drums, shoes, linings, bonded/riveted segments, rotors, brake pads, calipers and castings.

Commercial DistributionAffinia South America Products. We manufacture and/or distribute products in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Venezuela, including fuel and water pumps, universal joint kits, axle sets, shocks, steering, filtration products, brake products, suspension parts and other aftermarket products.

Chassis Products.We are a leading designer, manufacturer, marketer and distributor of a broad range of chassis products for the aftermarket. Our chassis products include steering, suspension and driveline products such as ball joints, tie rods, Pitman arms, idler arms, drag links, control arms, center links, stabilizers and other related parts.

Sales Channels and Customers

We distribute our products across several sales channels, including traditional, retail and OES channels. Approximately 27% and 8% of our 2010 net sales from continuing operations were derived from our two largest customers, NAPA and CARQUEST, respectively. See “Risk Factors”—Our Business would be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our larger customers.” During 2010, we derived approximately 58% of our net sales from the United States and approximately 42% of our net sales from other countries.

We have maintained long-standing relationships with many of our top customers. Some of our most significant customers include NAPA, CARQUEST, ADN, ACDelco, Federated, ADN, Uni-Select, Les Schwab, the Alliance and O’Reilly Auto Parts, each of which is a key player in the aftermarket.

The following table provides a description of the primary sales channels to which we supply our products:

Primary Sales Channels

Description

Customers

TraditionalWarehouses and distribution centers that supply local distribution outlets, which sell to professional installers.NAPA, CARQUEST, Federated, ADN, the Alliance and Uni-Select
RetailRetail stores, including national chains that sell replacement parts directly to consumers (the DIY market) and to some professional installers.O’Reilly Auto Parts and AutoZone
OESVehicle manufacturers and service departments at vehicle dealerships.ACDelco, Robert Bosch, TRW Automotive and Chrysler

The traditional channel is important to us because it is the primary source of products for professional installers. We believe that the quality and reputation of our brands for form, fit, and function promotes significant demand for our products from these installers and throughout the aftermarket supply chain. We have many long-standing relationships with leading distributors insegment mainly serves the traditional channel such as NAPA and CARQUEST, for whom we have manufactured products for approximately 40 and 20 years, respectively.retail channels.

As retailers become increasingly focused on consolidating their supplier base, we believe that our broad product offering, product quality, sales and marketing support and customer service capabilities make us more valuable to these customers.

Recently, automobile dealerships have begun providing “all-makes” service whereby dealers will service a vehicle even if they do not sell the make or model being serviced. These dealerships can choose to purchase competitive components from aftermarket suppliers. We believe the volumes generated by OES customers, especially in brakes, may provide an opportunity for sales growth.

Customer Support

We believe that our emphasis on customer support has been a key factor in maintaining our leading market positions. We continuously seek to improve service, order turnaround time, product coverage and order accuracy. Our ability to replenish inventory quickly is important to customers as it enables them to maximize their sales while carrying reduced inventory levels. For these reasons, we ship the vast majority of orders within 24 to 48 hours of receipt.

In order to maintain the competitiveness of our existing customers and maximize new sales opportunities, we have extensive product coverage. In turn, this has allowed our customers to develop a reputation for carrying the parts their customers need, especially for newer vehicles for which warranties may not have expired and aftermarket parts are not generally available.

In addition, as the aftermarket becomes more electronically integrated, customers often prefer to receive their application information electronically as well as in print form. We provide both printed and electronic catalog media. We also provide products which are problem solvers for professional installers, such as alignment products that allow installers to properly align a vehicle, even though the vehicle was not equipped with adjustment features. We provide many other support features, such as technical support hot lines and training and electronic systems which interface with customers and conform to aftermarket industry standards.

Intellectual Property

We strategically manage our portfolio of patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property.

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we maintain and have pending in excess ofapproximately 250 patents and patent applications on a worldwide basis.basis of which 64 relate to the Chassis group. These patents expire over various periods up to the year 2030.2033. We do not materially rely on any single patent or group of patents. In addition, we believe that the expiration of any single patent or group of patents will not materially affect our business. We have proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how, processes and other intellectual property rights that are not registered.

Trademarks are important to our business activities. We have a robust worldwide program of trademark registration and enforcement to maintain and strengthen the value of the trademarks and prevent the unauthorized use of our trademarks. The Raybestos and WIX trade names arename is highly recognizable to the public and areis a valuable assets.asset. Additionally, we use numerous other trademarks which are registered worldwide or for which we claim common law rights. As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had in excess of 750approximately 800 active trademark registrations and applications worldwide.worldwide of which 32 related to the Chassis group.

Raw Materials and Manufactured Components

We use a broad range of manufactured components and raw materials in our products, including steel, steel-related components, filtration media, aluminum, brass, iron, rubber, resins, plastics, paper and packaging materials. We purchase raw materials from a wide variety of domestic and international suppliers, and we have not, in recent years, experienced any significant shortages of these items and normally do not carry inventories of these items in excess of those reasonably required to meet our production and shipping schedule. Raw materials comprise the largest component of our manufactured goods cost structure. Commodity prices were generally flat during 2013 in comparison to 2012. We also purchase finished goods from a wide variety of sources for both of our segments. Our costs of purchased filters decreased slightly in 2013 in comparison to 2012.

With our commitment to globalization, we are subject to increases in freight costs due to increased oil prices. During 2010, oil prices increased in comparisonWe try to the prior year. The increase in oil prices during 2010 increasedrecover or offset material cost increases through price increases to our container costs from Asia, which mainly affected our brake product operations. Steel prices increased in 2010 which caused certain of our manufacturedcustomers and purchased parts costs to increase. Commodity prices for pulp increased in 2010 which increased our costs of packaging and filtration media in 2010.We will continue to review our purchasing and sourcing strategies for opportunitiesthrough initiatives to reduce costs.costs, including material substitution, process improvement and product redesigns. The Company experienced no significant supply problems in the purchase of its major raw materials.

Seasonality

In a typical year, we build inventory during the first and second quarters to accommodate our peak sales during the second and third quarters. Our working capital requirements therefore tend to be highest from March through August. In periods of weak sales, inventory can increase beyond typical levels, as our product delivery lead times are less than two days while certain components we purchase from overseas require lead times of approximately 90 days.

Backlog

Substantially all of the orders on hand at December 31, 20102013 are expected to be filled during 2011.2014. We do not view our backlog as being insufficient, excessive or problematic, or a significant indication of 20112014 sales.

Research and Development Activities

We provide information regarding our research and development activities in Note 7.“Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesPolicies” to our consolidated financial statements, which is included in Item  8 of this report.“Item  8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Competition

The light duty filter aftermarket is comprised of several large U.S. manufacturers that compete with us, including United Components, Inc. under the brand name Champ, Honeywell International Inc.FRAM Group, LLC under the brand name FRAM and Purolator Filters NA LLC under the brand name Purolator, along with several international light duty filter suppliers. The heavy dutyheavy-duty filter aftermarket is comprised of several manufacturers that compete with us, including Cummins, Inc. under the brand name Fleetguard, CLARCOR Inc. under the brand name Baldwin and Donaldson Company Inc. under the brand name Donaldson. The brake aftermarket is comprised of several large manufacturers that compete with us, including Federal Mogul Corp. under the brand name Wagner, Honeywell International Inc. under the brand name Bendix and Cardone Industries, Inc. under the brand name A1 Cardone. The chassis aftermarket is comprised primarily of one large U.S. manufacturer that competes with us, Federal Mogul Corp. under the brand name Moog, along with some international chassis suppliers. The Commercial DistributionAffinia South America productssegment competitors include Dpk Distribuidora de Pecas, Ltda, Pacaembu Autopeças, Polipeças Comercial e Importadora Ltda and Comdip Comercial Distribuidora de Peças Ltda. We compete on, among other things, quality, price, service, brand reputation, delivery, technology and product offerings.

Employees

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had 11,8356,266 employees, of whom 6,0412,813 were employed in North America, 2,976 were employed in Asia, 1,6501,768 were employed in South America, and 1,1681,510 were employed in Europe.Europe and 175 were employed in Asia. Approximately 22%31% of our employees are salaried and the remaining approximately 78%69% of our employees are hourly. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 3% of our 4,350 U.S. employees and approximately 2% of our 246 Canadian employees were represented by unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. Included in our headcount are 354 Chassis group employees in North America.

The U.S. collective bargaining agreement covers approximately 139 employees and expires in October 2011. The Canadian collective bargaining agreement covers approximately 5 employees and expires in March 2013.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air or water, the emission of noise and odors, the management and disposal of hazardous substances or wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites and human health and safety. Some of our operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent or reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities. Contamination has been discovered at certain of our owned properties, which is currently being monitored and/or remediated. We are not aware of any contaminated sites which we believe will result in material liabilities; however, the discovery of additional remedial obligations at these or other sites could result in significant liabilities.ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations,” requires that a liability for the fair value of an Asset Retirement Obligation (“ARO”) be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, with the offsetting associated asset retirement costs capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.

In addition, many of our current and former facilities are located on properties with long histories of industrial or commercial operations. Because some environmental laws can impose liability for the entire cost of clean-up upon any of the current or former owners or operators, regardless of fault, we could become liable for investigating or remediating contamination at these properties if contamination requiring such activities is discovered in the future. We have incurred environmental remediation costs associated with the comprehensive restructuring and the acquisition restructuring.

We are also subject to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and similar state and foreign laws regarding worker safety. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Historically, our costs of achieving and maintaining compliance with environmental and health and safety requirements have not been material to our operations.

Internet Availability

Available free of charge through our internet website,www.affiniagroup.com, under the investor relations tab are our recent filings of forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports can be found on our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (“SEC”). The information contained on or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).SEC.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

If any of the following events discussed in the following risks were to occur, our results of operations, financial conditions, or cash flows could be materially affected. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known by us may also constrain our business operations.

Risks Relating to Our Industry and Our Business

Continued volatilityDomestic and global economic conditions, including conditions in and disruption to the global economy, including the global capital and credit markets, hashave affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to access credit and hashave affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect the financial soundness of our customers and suppliers.

TheOur business and operating results have been, and will continue to be, affected by domestic and global economy,economic conditions, including conditions in the global capital and credit markets, has been experiencingmarkets. Domestic and global economies had until recently experienced a period of significant uncertainty, characterized by very weak or negative economic growth, high unemployment, reduced spending by consumers and businesses, the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions and a considerable level of intervention from the United States federal government and various foreign governments. These recessionaryDowngrades of long-term sovereign debt issued by the United States and various European countries by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and other rating agencies could also affect global and domestic financial markets and economic conditions. Recessionary conditions have materially and adversely affected the demand for our products and services and, therefore, reduced purchases by our customers, which has negatively affected our revenue growth and caused a decrease in our profitability.

Although many vehicle maintenance and repair expenses are non-discretionary, difficult economic conditions may reduce miles driven and thereby increase periods between maintenance and repairs. In addition, interest rate fluctuations, financial market volatility or credit market disruptions may limit our access to capital, and may also negatively affect our customers’ and our suppliers’ ability to obtain credit to finance their businesses on acceptable terms. As a result, our customers’ need for and ability to purchase our products or services may decrease, and our suppliers may increase their prices, reduce their output or change their terms of sale. If our customers’ or suppliers’ operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain credit, our customers may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable owed to us, and our suppliers may restrict credit or impose different payment terms. Any inability of customers to pay us for our products and services, or any demands by suppliers for different payment terms, may materially and adversely affect our earnings and cash flow.

If these economic conditions do not improve or continue to deteriorate, our results of operations or financial condition could limit our ability to take actions pursuant to certain covenants in our debt agreements that are tied to ratios based on our financial performance. Such covenants include our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments or pay dividends.

Our business would be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our larger customers.

For the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, approximately 27%22% and 8%6% of our net sales from continuing operations were to NAPA and CARQUEST, respectively. To compete effectively, we must continue to satisfy these and other customers’ pricing, service, technology and increasingly stringent quality and reliability requirements. Additionally, our revenues may be affected by decreases in NAPA’s or CARQUEST’s business or market share. Consolidation among our customers may also negatively impact our business. We cannot provide any assurance as to the amount of future business with these or any other customers. While we intend to continue to focus on retaining and winning these and other customers’ business, we may not succeed in doing so. Although business with any given customer is typically split among numerous contracts, the loss of, or significant reduction in purchases by, one of those major customers could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

CARQUEST represented our second largest customer for the year ended December 31, 2013. On January 2, 2014, General Parts International, Inc., which owned and operated stores under the CARQUEST brand and also provided services to independently owned stores that operated under the CARQUEST brand, was acquired by Advance Auto Parts, Inc. This merger could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increased crude oil and gasoline prices could reduce global demand for and use of automobiles and increase our costs, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Material increases in the price of crude oil have historically been a contributing factor to the periodic reduction in the global demand for and use of automobiles. An increase in the price of crude oil could reduce global demand for and use of automobiles and continue to shift customer demand away from larger cars and light trucks (including sport utility vehicles (“SUVs”), which we believe have more frequent replacement intervals for our products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Demand for traditional SUVs and vans hashave declined in the past due, in part, to higher gasoline prices. If this trend were to continue, or if total miles driven were to decrease for a number of years, it could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as higher gasoline prices result in a reduction in discretionary spending for auto repair by the end users of our products, our results of operations have been, and could continue to be, impacted. Additionally, higher gasoline prices have a material and adverse impact on our freight expenses.

The shift in demand from premium to economy brands may require us to produce value products at the expense of premium products, resulting in lower prices, thereby reducing our margins and decreasing our net sales.

We estimate that a majority of our net sales are currently derived from products we consider to be premium products. There has been, and may continue to be, a shift in demand from premium products, on which we can generally command premium pricing and generate enhanced margins, to value products. If such a trend continues, we may be forced to expand our production and/or purchases of value products at competitive prices. In addition, we could be forced to further reduce our prices to remain competitive, in which case our margins will decrease unless we make corresponding reductions in our cost structure.

We are subject to increasing pricing pressure from imports, particularly from lower labor cost countries.

Price competition from other aftermarket manufacturers particularly those based in lower labor cost countries, such as China, have historically played a role and may play an increasing role in the aftermarket sectors in which we compete. Pricing pressures have historically been more prevalent with respect to our brake products than our other products. While aftermarket manufacturers in these locations have historically competed primarily in markets for less technologically advanced products and manufactured a limited number of products, many are expanding their manufacturing capabilities to produce a broad range of lower labor cost, higher quality products and provide an expanded product offering. In the future, competitors in Asia or other lower labor cost sources may be able to effectively compete in our premium markets and produce a wider range of products which may force us to move additional manufacturing capacity offshore and/or lower our prices, reducing our margins and/or decreasing our net sales.

Increasing costs for manufactured components, raw materials and energy prices may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We use a broad range of manufactured components and raw materials in our products, including raw steel, steel-related components, filtration media, aluminum, brass, iron, rubber, resins, plastics, paper and packaging materials. Materials comprise the largest component of our manufactured goods cost structure. Increases in the price of these items could materially increase our operating costs and materially and adversely affect our profit margins. In addition, in connection with passing through steel and other raw material price increases to our customers, there has typically been a delay of up to several months in our ability to increase prices, which has temporarily impacted profitability. In the future, it may be difficult to pass further price increases on to our customers, especially if we experience additional cost increases soon after implementing price increases. In addition, we have experienced longer than typical lead times in sourcing some of our steel-related components and certain finished products, which has caused us to buy from non-preferred vendors at higher costs.

If our customers seek more expansive return policies or practices, such as extended payment terms, our cash flows and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to product returns from customers, some of which manage their excess inventory by returning product to us. Our contracts with our customers typically include provisions that permit our customers to return specified levels of their purchases. Returns on a continuing operations basis have historically represented approximately 2%less than 1% of our sales. If returns from our customers significantly increase, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, some customers in the aftermarket are pursuing ways to shift their costs of working capital, including extending payment terms. To the extent customers extend payment terms, our cash flows and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to other risks associated with our non-U.S. operations.

We have significant manufacturing operations outside the United States, including joint ventures and other alliances.States. In 2010,2013, approximately 42%58% of our net sales from continuing operations originated outside the United States. Risks inherent in international operations include:

 

multiple regulatory requirements that are subject to change and that could restrict our ability to manufacture, market or sell our products;

 

inflation, recession, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates and discriminatory fiscal policies;

 

trade protection measures; including increased duties and taxes, and import or export licensing requirements;

 

price controls;

 

exposure to possible expropriation or other government actions;

 

differing local product preferences and product requirements;

 

difficulty in establishing, staffing and managing operations;

differing labor regulations;

 

differing labor regulations;

potentially negative consequences from changes in or interpretations of tax laws;

 

political and economic instability and possible terrorist attacks against American interests;

 

enforcement of remedies in various jurisdictions; and

 

diminished protection of intellectual property in some countries.

These and other factors may have a material and adverse effect on our international operations or on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may experience net foreign exchange losses due to currency fluctuations.

We are exposed to risks related to our receivables factoring arrangements.

We have entered into agreements with third-party financial institutions to factor on a non-recourse basis certain receivables. The terms of the factoring arrangements provide for the factoring of certain U.S. Dollar-denominated or Canadian Dollar-denominated receivables, which are purchased at the face amount of the receivable discounted at the annual rate of LIBOR plus a bank-determined spread on the purchase date. The amount factored is not contractually defined by the factoring arrangements and our use will vary each month based on the amount of underlying receivables and our cash flow needs. We began factoring certain of our receivables during 2010. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2010, the total amount2012 and 2013, we factored $668 million and $541 million of receivables, factored was $156respectively, and incurred costs on factoring of $5 million and the cost incurred on factoring was $2 million. Receivables$4 million, respectively, which included our Chassis group and our Brake North America and Asia group. Accounts receivable factored by us will beare accounted for as a sale and removed from the balance sheet at the time of factoring and the cost of the factoring will beis accounted for in either other income.income or discontinued operations if it relates to our Chassis group and our Brake North America and Asia group. If any of the financial institutions we have factoring arrangements with experiencesexperience financial difficulties or isare otherwise unable or unwilling to honor the terms of, or otherwise terminates,terminate, our factoring arrangements, we may experience material and adverse economic losses due to the failure of such factoring arrangements and the impact of such failure on our liquidity, which could have a material and adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability and warranty and recall claims that may be brought against us.

We may be exposed to product liability and warranty claims in the event that our products actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected or the use of our products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. Accordingly, we could experience material warranty or product liability losses in the future and incur significant costs to defend these claims.

In addition, if any of our products are, or are alleged to be, defective, we may be required to participate in a recall of that product if the defect or the alleged defect relates to vehicle safety. Our costs associated with providing product warranties could be material. Product liability, warranty and recall costs may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover such costs.

As a result of the consolidation driven by improved logistics and data management, distributors have reduced their inventory levels, which have reduced and could continue to reduce our sales.

Warehouse distributors have consolidated through acquisition and rationalized inventories, while streamlining their distribution systems through more timely deliveries and better data management. The corresponding reduction in purchases by distributors has negatively impacted our sales. Further consolidation or improvements in distribution systems could have a similar material and adverse impact on our sales.

We are subject to costly regulation, particularly in relation to environmental, health and safety matters, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to a substantial number of costly regulations. In particular, we are required to comply with frequently changing and increasingly stringent requirements of federal, state and local environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations in the United States and other countries, including those governing emissions to air, discharges to air and water, and the creation and emission of noise and odor; the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials; and the cleanup of contaminated properties and occupational health and safety. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party property damage or personal injury claims, or costs to upgrade or replace existing equipment, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws or non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. In addition, many of our current and former facilities are located on properties with long histories of industrial or commercial operations. Because some environmental laws can impose joint and several liability for the entire cost of cleanup upon any of the current or former owners or operators, regardless of fault, we could become liable for investigating and/or remediating contamination at these properties if contamination requiring such activities is discovered in the future. We cannot assure that we have been, or will at all times be, in complete compliance with all environmental requirements, or

that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with these requirements in excess of amounts we have reserved. In addition, environmental requirements are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. These requirements may change in the future in a manner that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have made and will continue to make expenditures to comply with environmental requirements. These requirements, responsibilities and associated expenses and expenditures, if they continue to increase, could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations. While our costs to defend and settle claims arising under environmental laws in the past have not been material, we cannot assure you that this will remain the case in the future. For more information about our environmental compliance and potential environmental liabilities, see “Item 1. Business—Environmental Matters” and “Item 3. Business—Legal Proceedings.”

Our operations would be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to purchase raw materials, manufactured components or equipment from our suppliers.

Because we purchase from suppliers various types of raw materials, finished goods, equipment and component parts, we may be materially and adversely affected by the failure of those suppliers to perform as expected. This non-performance may consist of delivery delays or failures caused by production issues or delivery of non-conforming products. The risk of non-performance may also result from the insolvency or bankruptcy of one or more of our suppliers. Our suppliers’ ability to supply products to us is also subject to a number of risks, including availability of raw materials, such as steel, destruction of their facilities or work stoppages. In addition, our failure to promptly pay, or order sufficient quantities of inventory from, our suppliers may increase the cost of products we purchase or may lead to suppliers refusing to sell products to us at all. Our efforts to protect against and to minimize these risks may not always be effective.

Our intellectual property portfolio could be subject to legal challenges and we may be subject to certain intellectual property claims.

We have developed and actively pursue developing a considerable amount of proprietary technology in the replacement products industry and rely on intellectual property laws of the United States and other countries to protect such technology. In doing so, we incur ongoing costs to enforce and defend our intellectual property. We have from time to time been involved in litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property. We may be subject to material intellectual property claims in the future or we may incur significant costs or losses related to such claims, including payments for licenses that may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Our proprietary rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Moreover, third parties may independently develop technology or other intellectual property that is comparable with or similar to our own, and we may not be able to prevent the use of it.

Our success depends in part on our development of improved products, and our efforts may fail to meet the needs of customers on a timely or cost-effective basis.

Our continued success depends on our ability to maintain advanced technological capabilities, machinery and knowledge necessary to adapt to changing market demands as well as to develop and commercialize innovative products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop new products as successfully as in the past or that we will be able to keep pace with technological developments by our competitors and the industry generally. In addition, we may develop specific technologies and capabilities in anticipation of customers’ demands for new innovations and technologies. If such demand does not materialize, we may be unable to recover the costs incurred in such programs. If we are unable to recover these costs or if any such programs do not progress as expected, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The introduction of new and improved products and services may reduce our future sales.

Improvements in technology and product quality may extend the longevity of vehicle component parts and delay aftermarket sales. In particular, in our oil filter business the introduction of oil change indicators and the use of synthetic motor oils may further extend oil filter replacement cycles. The introduction of electric, fuel cell and hybrid automobiles may pose a long-term risk to our business because these vehicles may alter demand for our primary product lines. In addition, the introduction by OEMs of increased warranty and maintenance service initiatives, which are gaining popularity, have the potential to decrease the demand for our products in the traditional and retail sales channels.

We may not be able to achieverealize the cost savings that we expect from the restructuring of our operations.

At the end of 2005 we announced the comprehensive restructuring through which we seeksought to lower costs and improve profitability by rationalizing manufacturing operations and to focus on low-cost sourcing opportunities. We have completed the comprehensive restructuring plan and have realized approximately $98$100 million in cost savings as a result of the comprehensive restructuring to date. However, weWe recently announced the consolidation of our corporate office into our Filtration headquarters in 2014. We may not be able to achieve the level of benefits that we expectexpected to realize or we may not be able to realize these benefits within the timeframes we currently expect. Our expectations regarding cost savings are also predicated upon maintaining our sales levels. Changes inFurthermore, the amount, timing and charactermajority of chargesour comprehensive restructuring related to our Brake North America and Asia group, which was distributed from the restructuring, failure to complete or a substantial delay in completingCompany on November 30, 2012, and the restructuring and planned divestitures or the receipt of lower proceeds from such divestitures than currently is anticipated could have a material and adverse effect onrelated cost savings will no longer benefit us. We expect to record an additional $4 million in comprehensive restructuring costs for the remainder of the comprehensive restructuring.

Work stoppages, labor disputes or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt our operations.

As of December 31, 2010, 139The consolidation of our U.S. employees and 5 ofcorporate office into our Canadian employees were represented by unions. It is possible that our workforce will become more unionized in the future. We may be subject to work stoppages and may be affected by other labor disputes. A work stoppage at one or more of our plants may have a material and adverse effect on our business. Unionization activitiesFiltration headquarters could also increase our costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, a work stoppage at one of our suppliers could materially and adversely affect our operations if an alternative sourcebusiness in the current year.

During 2014, we will begin the process of supply were not readily available. Stoppages bytransitioning our corporate office to our Filtration headquarters. This will involve hiring new employees and consolidating certain functions. This may occupy the attention and focus of our customers also could result in reduced demand for our products.management, primarily during the first half of 2014, as the transition occurs. The transition involves numerous risks due to significant turnover and the potential diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns.

Any acquisitionsdispositions we make could disrupt our business and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may, from time to time, consider acquisitionsdispositions of complementary companies, products or technologies. Acquisitionsexisting lines of business. For example, we distributed our Brake North America and Asia group to the shareholders of Holdings in 2012, and we entered into a purchase agreement to sell our Chassis group in January 2014. Dispositions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the acquired businesses, the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns and potential adverse effects on existing business relationships with current customers and suppliers. In addition, anyAdditionally, there are risks associated with our chassis products group successfully segregating from the Brake North America and Asia group. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any acquisitions we make could disrupt our business and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may, from time to time, consider acquisitions of complementary companies, products or technologies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns and potential adverse effects on existing business relationships with current customers and suppliers. Any acquisitions could present difficulties in the assimilation of the acquired business and involve the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness. We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully integrate any acquisitions that we pursue or that such acquisitions will perform as planned or prove to be beneficial to our operations and cash flow. Any such failureof these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cypress controls us and may have conflicts of interest with us or the holders of our notes in the future.

Cypress beneficially owns 61% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, Cypress has control over our decisions to enter into any corporate transaction and has the ability to prevent any transaction that requires the approval of stockholders regardless of whether or not other stockholders or note holders believe that any such transactions are in their own best interests. Additionally, Cypress is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Cypress may also pursue, for its own account, acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So long as Cypress continues to own a significant amount of the outstanding shares of our common stock, even if such amount is less than 50%, it will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions including director and officer appointments, potential mergers and acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions.

Our ability to maintain our ongoing operations could be impaired.

To be successful and achieve our objectives under our strategic plan, we must retain qualified personnel. The sale of our Chassis group could create uncertainty for our employees and this uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, including our senior management, and to hire new talent necessary to maintain our ongoing operations which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Accordingly, we may fail to maintain our ongoing operations, or execute our strategic plan if we are unable to manage such changes effectively.

We may be required to recognize impairment charges for our long-lived assets.assets, which include fixed assets, intangible assets, and goodwill.

At December 31, 2010,2013, the net carrying value of long-lived assets (property, plant and equipment) totaled $217$123 million. In accordance with GAAP, we periodically assess our long-lived assets to determine if they are impaired. Significantshall be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as, significant negative industry or economic trends, disruptions to our business, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in use of the assets, divestitures and market capitalization declines indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable and may result in charges to long-lived asset impairments. Future impairment charges could significantly affect our results of operations in the periods recognized. Impairment charges would also reduce our consolidated net worth and increase our debt to total capitalization ratio, which could negatively impact our access to the public debt and equity markets.

We could be required to record a material non-cash charge to income if our recorded intangible assets or goodwill is impaired, or if we shorten intangible asset useful lives.

We have $215$63 million of recorded intangible assets and goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010.2013. These assets may become impaired with the loss of significant customers or a decline of profitability. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are made to determine the fair value of the respective reporting unit. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for goodwill at that time. If our trade names carrying values exceed fair value we will be required to record an impairment charge.

While our intangibles with definite lives may not be impaired, the useful lives are subject to continual assessment, taking into account historical and expected losses of relationships that were in the base at time of acquisition. This assessment may result in a reduction of the remaining useful life of these assets, resulting in potentially significant increases to non-cash amortization expense that is charged to our consolidated statement of operations. An intangible asset or goodwill impairment charge, or a reduction of amortization lives, could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

Business disruptions could materially and adversely affect our future sales and financial condition or increase our costs and expenses.

Our business may be disrupted by a variety of events or conditions, including, but not limited to, threats to physical security, acts of terrorism, labor stoppages or disruptions, raw material shortages, natural and man-made disasters, information technology failures and public health crises. Any of these disruptions could affect our internal operations or services provided to customers, and could impact our sales, increase our expenses or materially and adversely affect our reputation.

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations could cause a decline in our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

As a result of our international operations, we are subject to risk because we generate a significant portion of our revenues and incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Our international presence is most significant in Brazil, Canada, China, Mexico and Poland. To the extent that we have significantly more costs than revenues generated in a foreign currency, we are subject to risk if the foreign currency appreciates because the appreciation effectively increases our cost in that country to a greater extent than our revenues. To the extent that we are unable to match revenues received in foreign currencies with costs paid in the same currency, foreign exchange rate fluctuations in that currency could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of some of our operating entities are reported in foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. Dollars at the applicable foreign exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. As a result, appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies generally will have a negative impact on our reported sales and profits.

For example, on January 11, 2010, the Venezuelan government devalued the country’s currency, bolivar fuerteBolivar Fuerte (“VEF”), in 2010 and changed to a two-tier exchange structure.2013. The official exchange rate moved from 2.15 VEF per U.S. Dollar to 2.60 VEF for essential goods and 4.30 VEF for non-essential goods and services, with our products falling into the non-essential category. A Venezuelan currency control board is responsible for foreign exchange procedures, including approval of requests for exchanges of VEF for

U.S. Dollars at the official, government established exchange rate. We use the parallel market rate, which ranged between 5.30 to 7.70 VEF to the U.S. Dollar, to translate the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary because we expect to obtain U.S. Dollars at the parallel market rate for future dividend remittances. The one-time2010 devaluation had a $2 million negative impact on our pre-tax net income in 2010. The 2013 devaluation had a $3 million negative impact on our pre-tax net income in 2013. Further depreciation of the VEF, or depreciation of the currencies of other countries in which we do business, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Business Environment.”

We use a combination of natural hedging techniques and financial derivatives to protect against certain foreign currency exchange rate risks. Such hedging activities may be ineffective or may not offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from foreign currency variations. Gains or losses associated with hedging activities also may negatively impact operating results.

Entering new markets poses new competitive threats and commercial risks.

In recent years we have sought to expand our manufacturing and sales into new markets. Expanding into new markets requires investments and resources that may not be available as needed. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in leveraging our capabilities to compete favorably in new markets or that we will be able to recoup our significant investments in expansion projects. If our customers in new markets experience reduced demand for their products or financial difficulties, our future prospects will be negatively affected as well.

We conduct significant operations at our facility in Juarez, Mexico, which could be materially and adversely affected as a result of the increased levels of drug-related violence in that city.

Recently, fighting among rival drug cartels has led to unprecedented levels of violent crime in Juarez, Mexico and elsewhere along the U.S.-Mexico border despite increased law-enforcement efforts by the Mexican and the U.S. governments. This situation presents several risks to our operations in Juarez, including, among others, that our employees may be directly affected by the violence, that our employees may elect to relocate out of the Juarez region in order to avoid the risk of violent crime to themselves or their families, and that our customers may become increasingly reluctant to visit our Juarez facility, which could delay new business opportunities and other important aspects of our business. If any of these risks materializes, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

The mix of profits and losses in various jurisdictions may have an impact on our overall tax rate, which in turn, may materially and adversely affect our profitability.

Tax expenses and benefits are determined separately for each of our taxpaying entities or groups of entities that is consolidated for tax purposes in each jurisdiction. Losses in such jurisdictions may provide no current financial statement tax benefit. As a result, changes in the mix of projected profits and losses between jurisdictions, among other factors, could have a significant impact on our overall effective tax rate.

The value of our deferred tax assets could become impaired, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had $85$117 million in net deferred income tax assets. These deferred tax assets include net operating loss carryforwards that can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce income taxes payable in those future periods. We periodically determine the probability of the realization of deferred tax assets, using significant judgments and estimates with respect to, among other things, historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and tax planning strategies. If we determine in the future that there is not sufficient positive evidence to support the valuation of these assets, due to the factors described above or other factors, we may be required to further adjust the valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets. Such a reduction could result in material non-cash expenses in the period in which the valuation allowance is adjusted and could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited and delayed. As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of $266$301 million. Certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) could limit our annual utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards. There can be no assurance that we will be able to utilize all of our net operating loss carryforwards and any subsequent net operating loss carryforwards in the future.

We must successfully maintain and/or upgrade our information technology systems.

We rely on various information technology systems to manage our operations. We are currently implementing modifications and upgrades to our systems, including making changes to legacy systems, replacing legacy systems with successor systems with new functionality and acquiring new systems with new functionality. These types of activities subject us to inherent costs and risks associated with replacing and changing these systems, including impairment of our ability to fulfill customer orders, potential disruption of our internal control structure, substantial capital expenditures, additional administration and operating expenses, retention of sufficiently skilled personnel to implement and operate the new systems, demands on management time, and other risks and costs of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems or of integrating new systems into our current systems. Our system implementations may not result in productivity improvements at a level that outweighs the costs of implementation, or at all. In addition, the implementation of new technology systems may cause disruptions in our business operations and have an adverse effect on our business and operations, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated.

Our international operations are subject to political and economic risks of developing countries and special risks associated with doing business in corrupting environments.

We design, manufacture, distribute and market a broad range of aftermarket products in various regions, some of which are less developed, have less stability in legal systems and financial markets and are generally recognized as potentially more corrupt business environments than the United States, and therefore present greater political, economic and operational risks. We have in place certain policies, procedures and certain ongoing training of employees with regard to business ethics and many key legal requirements, such as applicable anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), which make it illegal for us to give anything of value to foreign officials in order to obtain or retain any business or other advantages; however, there can be no assurance that our employees will adhere to our code of business conduct and ethics or any other of our policies, applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, or other legal requirements. If we fail to enforce our policies and procedures properly or fail to maintain adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices to accurately record our transactions, we may be subject to regulatory sanctions. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, or other laws or regulations, we are required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, and if violations are found or suspected we could face civil and criminal penalties, and significant costs for investigations, litigation, fees, settlements and judgments, which in turn could have a material and adverse effect on our business.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Our substantial leverage could harm our business by limiting our available cash and our access to additional capital and, to the extent of our variable rate indebtedness, exposing us to interest rate risk.

On April 25, 2013, we refinanced our existing notes and credit facilities and made a distribution to Holdings, our shareholder. The refinancing consisted of the issuance of $250 million aggregate principal amount 7.75% Senior Notes due May 1, 2021 (the “Senior Notes”), a $200 million term loan due April 25, 2016 (“Term Loan B-1”), a $470 million term loan due April 25, 2020 (“Term Loan B-2,” and together with Term Loan B-1, the “Term Loans”), the proceeds of which we used, together with $31 million of cash on hand, to redeem our 10.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 (the “Secured Notes”), redeem our 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the “Subordinated Notes”), pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing transaction and make a $350 million distribution to Holdings. As a result of the Acquisition in 2004, thethis refinancing, in 2009 and the issuance of additional Subordinated Notes in 2010, we are highly leveraged. This leverage may limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions, restructuring and general corporate or other purposes, limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors. Further volatility in the credit markets could adversely impact our ability to obtain favorable terms on financing in the future. In addition, a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and is not available for other purposes, including our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities. We may be more vulnerable than a less leveraged company to a downturn in the general economic conditions or in our business, or we may be unable to carry out capital spending that is important to our growth. We may be vulnerable to interest rate increases, as certain of our borrowings, including those under our ABL Revolver, are at variable rates. We can give no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that revenue growth or operating improvements will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available under our ABL Revolver in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which actions may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to maintain a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to sell material assets or operations to attempt to meet our debt service and other obligations. Our ABL Revolver, Term Loans and the indentures governing our notes restrict our ability to use the proceeds from asset sales. We may not be able to consummate those asset sales to raise capital or sell assets at prices that we believe are fair, and proceeds that we do receive may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.

Despite our current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the terms of the agreements governing our debt instruments contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had $191$117 million of borrowing capacity available under the ABL Revolver after giving effect to $15$10 million in outstanding letters of credit, none of which was drawn against, and $3less than $1 million for borrowing base reserves. If we incur additional debt above the levels currently in effect, the risks associated with our leverage, including those described above, would increase.

The terms of our debt covenants could limit how we conduct our business and our ability to raise additional funds.

The agreements that govern the terms of our debt, including the indenturesindenture governing our notes and the credit agreementagreements that governsgovern our ABL Revolver,Senior Credit Facilities, contain, and the agreements that govern our future indebtedness may contain, certain covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to (subject to certain qualifications and exceptions):to:

 

incur and guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified stock or issue certain preferred stock;

 

repay subordinated indebtedness prior to its stated maturity;

 

pay dividends or make other distributions on or redeem or repurchase stock or make certain other restricted payments;

our stock;

 

issue capital stock;

change our line of business;

designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries;

make certain investments or acquisitions;

 

create certain liens or encumbrances;

liens;

 

sell assets;

assets or merge with or into other companies;

 

enter into transactions with stockholders and affiliates;

 

issue capital stock;

change our line of business;

consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;

designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries;

make capital expenditures; and

 

restrict dividends, distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries.

There are limitations on our ability to incur the full $315$175 million of commitments under the ABL Revolver. The borrowers organized in the United States are limited to $295 million and the borrower organized in Canada may borrow up to the remaining $20 million. In each case, borrowingsBorrowings under our ABL Revolver are limited by a specified borrowing base consisting of, among other things, a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory, less customary reserves. Subject to certain conditions, the commitments under the ABL Revolver may be increased by up to $160$50 million.

In addition, under the ABL Revolver, as amended and restated, a covenant trigger would occur if an event of default occurs or excess availability under the ABL Revolver is at any time less than the greater of 12.5%10.0% of the total revolving loan commitmentsborrowing base at such time and $39.5$15.0 million, and shall continue until such time thereafter as no event of default shall have existed and as excess availability shall have exceeded asuch threshold amount, in each case, at all times during a 6030 consecutive day period. If the covenant trigger were to occur, we would be required to satisfy and maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.10x,1.0x, measured for the last twelve-month period. Our ability to meet the required fixed charge coverage ratio can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet this ratio. A breach of this covenant or of any of these covenantsother covenant applicable to the ABL Revolver could result in a default under the ABL Revolver.thereunder.

Moreover, the ABL Revolver provides the lenders considerable discretion to impose reserves, which could materially impair the amount of borrowings that would otherwise be available to us. There can be no assurance that the lenders under the ABL Revolver will not impose such actions during the term of the ABL Revolver.Revolver and further, were they to do so, the resulting impact of this action could materially and adversely impair our ability to make interest payments on the notes.

A breach of the covenants or restrictions under the indenturesindenture governing ourthe notes or the credit agreementagreements that governsgovern the ABL RevolverSenior Credit Facilities could result in a default under the applicable indebtedness. Such default may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under our ABL Revolver would permit the lenders under our ABL Revolver to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under that facility. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under our ABL Revolver,Senior Credit Facilities, those lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. In the event our lenders and noteholders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we cannot assure that we and our subsidiaries would have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness. As a result of these restrictions, we may be:

 

limited in how we conduct our business;

 

unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or

 

unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.

These restrictions may affect our ability to grow in accordance with our plans.

Our variable rate indebtedness exposes us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt costs to increase significantly.

A portion of our borrowings is at variable rates of interest and exposes us to interest rate risks. We are exposed to the risk of rising interest rates to the extent that we fund our operations with short-term or variable-rate borrowings. As of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company’s $696$937 million of aggregate debt outstanding consisted of $105$687 million of floating-rate debt and $591$250 million of fixed-rate debt. Fixed rate debt comprised approximately 85%27% of our total debt as of December 31, 2010.2013. Any borrowings we incur under our ABL Revolver will be at floating interest rates and will expose us to interest rate risk. Based on the amount of floating-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 20102013 a 1% rise in interest rates would result in approximately $1$7 million in incremental interest expense. If the LIBOR rates increase in the future then the floating-rate debt could have a material effect on our interest expense.

In April 2013, the Company entered into interest rate swaps having an aggregate notional value of $300 million to effectively fix the rate of interest on a portion of our variable rate Term Loan B-2 until April 2020. Each of these transactions contains an embedded benchmark-rate floor of 1.25%, which mirrors the terms contained in the Term Loan B-2. Based on the amount of floating-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2013, the interest rate swaps would reduce the incremental interest expense from a 1% rise in interest rates from $7 million to $4 million. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate fair value of the interest rate swap was an asset of $11 million.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.Comments

None.

 

Item 2.Properties

Our principal executive offices are currently located in Ann Arbor, Michigan;Michigan, and will be consolidated into our Filtration headquarters in 2014; our operations include numerous manufacturing, research and development and warehousing facilities as well as offices. The table below summarizes the number of facilities by geographical region for our manufacturing, distribution and warehouse and other facilities (excluding the Commercial Distribution Europe business unit).facilities.

 

  Manufacturing
Facilities
   Distribution and
Warehouse
Facilities
   Other
Facilities
   Manufacturing
Facilities
   Distribution and
Warehouse
Facilities
   Other
Facilities
 

United States

   6     13     10     3     2     11  

Canada

   1     1     1     —      1     1  

Mexico

   5     2     2     1     —      —    

Europe

   2     1     3     3     2     2  

South America

   4     23     4     4     23     2  

Asia

   3     1     3     1     —       1  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   21     41     23     12     28     17  
              

 

   

 

   

 

 

The other facilities around the globe include sixtwo facilities that have been closed as part of our restructuring programs, ten sales and administration offices four under construction facilities, one research and development facility and twofive non-operational storage sites. Approximately 52%Of our manufacturing facilities approximately 67% are part of our principal manufacturing facilities are brake productionFiltration segment facilities, approximately 29%8% are filtration production facilities, approximately 5% are chassispart of our Chassis group production facilities and approximately 14%25% relates to other production facilities.our Affinia South America segment. Of the total number of principal manufacturing facilities, approximately 76% of such facilities75% are owned and approximately 24%25% are leased. The table above excludes the Commercial Distribution Europe segment that we sold on February 2, 2010,There are five facilities related to our Chassis group, which included four manufacturing facilities, 16 distribution and warehouse facilities and one other facility.is classified as a discontinued operation.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings are pending or threatened against us and our subsidiaries, arising from the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, intellectual property, product liability and environmental matters. We believe that the ultimate resolution of the foregoing matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

On September 30, 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with Satisfied Brake Products Inc. (“Satisfied”) for $10 million to settle our claims against Satisfied for their theft of our trade secrets. Upon execution of the settlement agreement, $2.5 million was due immediately and up to an additional $7.5 million is to be provided after liquidation of Satisfied’s business. On September 30, 2011, we recorded a gain of $2.5 million in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we recorded $4 million as a gain in continuing operations in the first quarter of 2012. The remaining claim against Satisfied was included in the distribution of the Brake North America and Asia Group to our shareholders.

On January 28, 2013, Walker Morris, counsel for Neovia Logistics Services (U.K.) Limited (“Neovia”) (formerly known as Caterpillar Logistics Services (U.K.) Limited) notified us that Quinton Hazell Automotive Limited (“QHAL”) intended to appoint administrators (comparable to a bankruptcy filing in the United States) and that Neovia may pursue a claim against us for liabilities arising out of a Logistics Services Agreement dated May 5, 2006 among Neovia, QHAL and Affinia Group Inc. (the “LSA”). In connection with our prior sale of QHAL and its related companies to Klarius Group Ltd. (“KGL”), Affinia Group Inc. assigned the LSA to KGL, KGL agreed to indemnify Affinia Group Inc. against any liability under the LSA and the other companies in the QHAL group agreed to provide a guarantee to Affinia Group Inc. against these liabilities. KGL and QHAL have both appointed administrators. By letter dated February 15, 2013, Neovia, through its counsel Walker Morris, notified us that Neovia is asserting a claim against Affinia Group Inc. for liabilities arising under the LSA, including asserted unpaid invoices totaling 5.7 million pounds. On March 31, 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed by S&E Quick Lube Distributors, Inc. of Utah against several auto parts manufacturers for allegedly conspiring to fix prices for replacement oil, air, fuel and transmission filters. Several auto parts companies are named as defendants, including Champion Laboratories, Inc., Purolator Filters NA LLC, Honeywell International Inc., Cummins Filtration Inc., Donaldson Company, Baldwin Filters Inc., Bosch USA., Mann + Hummel USA Inc., ArvinMeritor Inc., United Components Inc. and Wix Filtration Corp LLC (“Wix Filtration”), one of our subsidiaries. The lawsuit is currently pending as a consolidated Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) Proceeding in Chicago, IL because of multiple “tag-along” filings in several jurisdictions. Two suits have also been filed in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. Wix Filtration, along with other named defendants, has filed various motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaints, which28, 2013, we were denied by the court in December 2009. Several defendants, including Wix Filtration, have refiled motions to dismiss based upon plaintiffs’ most recent amended complaint. The court denied those motions in September 2010. Discovery in the action continues. Despite the U.S. Department of Justice closing its investigation in this matter, the State of Washington Attorney General has also issued Civil Investigative Demands to all defendants. We believe that Wix Filtration did not have significant sales in this particular market at the relevant time periods so we do not expect the lawsuit to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We intend to vigorously defend this matter.

DPH Holdings Corp., a successor to Delphi Corporation and certain of its affiliates (“Delphi”), served Affinia and certain of our other subsidiaries with a complaint to avoid over $17 million in allegedly preferential transfers, substantially alldemand for arbitration by Neovia. We filed our response on April 29, 2013. In the first quarter of which relate to allegedly preferential transfers involving our non-U.S. subsidiaries. On February 4, 2011,2014, we settled with Delphithe claim for $0.1 million.approximately $11 million including legal expenses.

We haveThe Company has various accruals for civil liability, including product liability, and other costs. If there is a range of equally probable outcomes, we accrue at the lower end of the range. The Company had $1 million and $2$13 million accrued as of December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2010,2013, respectively. In addition, we have various other claims that are reasonably possible of occurrence that range from less than $1 million to $10 million in the aggregate. There are no recoveries expected from third parties.

The Company has commenced a review of certain allegations that have arisen in connection with business operations involving our subsidiaries in Poland and Ukraine. The allegations raise issues involving potential improper payments in connection with governmental approvals, permits, or other regulatory areas and possible conflicts of interest. The review is being supervised by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and is being conducted with the assistance of outside professionals. The review is at an early stage and no determination can yet be made as to whether the Company, in connection with the circumstances surrounding the review, may become subject to any fines, penalties and/or other charges imposed by any governmental authority, or any other damages or costs that may arise in connection with those circumstances. The Company has voluntarily self-reported on these matters to the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and intends to fully cooperate with these agencies in their review.

 

Item 4.Removed and ReservedMine Safety Disclosures

None.

PART II.

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Shares

No trading market for our common stock currently exists. As of March 11, 2011,31, 2014, our parent, Holdings, was the sole holder of our common stock. The Company haspaid $352 million to its shareholder in 2013. Prior to 2013 the Company had never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock. We intend to retain all current and foreseeable future earnings to support operations. Our senior credit facilities and our notes indenturesindenture restrict our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock. For information in respect of securities authorized under our equity compensation plan, see “Item 11. Executive Compensation.”

 

Item 6.Selected Consolidated and Combined Financial Data

The financial statements included in this report are the consolidated financial statements of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. The selected financial data are derived from our financial statements. The financial data as of December 31, 20092012 and 20102013 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009,2011, 2012, and 20102013 are derived from the audited financial statements contained under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The selected financial data as of December 31, 2006,2009, December 31, 20072010 and December 31, 2008;2011; and for the years ended December 31, 20062009 and 2007,2010, are derived from our financial statements.statements that are not contained within this report.

You should read the following data in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2006 2007 2008 2009 2010   2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Statement of income data:(1)

      

Statement of income data:(1)

      

Net sales

  $1,892   $1,857   $1,915   $1,797   $1,991    $1,054   $1,190   $1,266   $1,259   $1,361  

Cost of sales

   (1,550  (1,512  (1,546  (1,429  (1,581   (817 (918 (979 (967 (1,043
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   342    345    369    368    410     237    272    287    292    318  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (298  (276  (276  (267  (290   (168  (171  (175  (172  (200

Income from settlement(2)

   —      15    —      —      —    
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating profit

   44    84    93    101    120     69    101    112    120    118  

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

   —      —      —      8    (1   8    (1  —     (1  (15

Other income (loss), net

   7    4    (3  5    3     3    1    4    3    (1

Interest expense

   (58  (59  (56  (69  (66   (68  (65  (67  (63  (73
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes and noncontrolling interest

   (7  29    34    45    56  

Income tax (provision) benefit

   5    (6  (18  (22  (27

Equity in income, net of tax

   —      —      —      1    1  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   12    36    49    59    29  

Income tax provision

   (12  (30  (28  (45  (22

Equity in income (loss), net of tax

   1    1    —     1    (2
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (2  23    16    24    30  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (3  (17  (19  (61  —    

Net income from continuing operations

   1    7    21    15    5  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (38  23    (93  (117  5  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

   (5  6    (3  (37  30     (37  30    (72  (102  10  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      —      —      7    6  

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   7    6    1    1    —    
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(5 $6   $(3 $(44 $24    $(44 $24   $(73 $(103 $10  
                  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Statement of cash flows data:

            

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $22   $1   $48   $55   $23    $55   $23   $14   $97   $99  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (21  (16  (75  (36  (98   (36  (98  (39  (23  (32

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (15  —      51    (35  66     (35  66    26    (78  (15

Other financial data:

            

Capital expenditures

  $24   $30   $25   $31   $52    $31   $52   $55   $27   $31  

Depreciation and amortization(3)

   41    30    34    36    37  

Balance sheet data (end of period): (4)

      

Depreciation and amortization(2)

   25    25    23    22    21  

Balance sheet data (end of period): (3)

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $70   $59   $77   $65   $55    $65   $55   $54   $51   $101  

Total current assets

   896    970    994    973    1,016     973    1,016    1,060    583    704  

Total assets

   1,381    1,457    1,515    1,483    1,589     1,483    1,589    1,459    960    1,009  

Total current liabilities

   389    401    467    437    455     437    455    419    251    279  

Total debt

   597    597    622    601    696  

Shareholder’s equity(5)

   383    434    416    437    448  

Total debt(4)

   601    696    698    569    937  

Shareholder’s equity (deficit) (5)

   437    448    347    151    (201

 

(1)In accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360,“Property, Plant, and Equipment,205-20, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Discontinued Operations, the Commercial Distribution Europe segment, which is also referred to as Quinton Hazell, the Brake North America and Asia group and the Chassis group are accounted for as a discontinued operation.operations. The consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect thisthese operations as discontinued operations. The consolidated statements of cash flows have not been adjusted for any periods presented to reflect these operations as discontinued operations. The consolidated balance sheet for December 31, 2009 has been adjusted to reflect the Commercial Distribution Europe segment, which we sold in February 2010, as a discontinued operation. The consolidated balance sheet for December 31, 2011 has been adjusted to reflect the Brake North America and Asia group as a discontinued operation, which we distributed on November 30, 2012. The consolidated balance sheet for December 31, 2013 has been adjusted to reflect the Chassis group as a discontinued operation.
(2)Affinia received a general unsecured nonpriority claim against Dana relating to a settlement in 2007. The claim was monetized for $15 million and was recorded as income from the settlement.
(3)The depreciation and amortization expense excludes the Commercial Distribution Europe segment.segment, the Brake North America and Asia group and the Chassis group. The consolidated cash flow statement, which is included in Item 8 of this report, includes the Commercial Distribution Europe segment.segment, the Brake North America and Asia group and the Chassis group. The depreciation for discontinued operations, which includes the Commercial Distribution Europe and the Brake North America and Asia group and the Chassis group, is disclosed in Note 18. Segment Information, which is included in Item 8 of this report.
(4)(3)The various balance sheet line items as of December 31, 2006, 20072009 and 20082010 have not been modified to reflect the discontinued operation of the Commercial Distribution Europe segment.Brake North America and Asia group. Additionally, the various balance sheet line items as of December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 have not been modified to reflect the discontinued operations of the Chassis group.
(4)The debt as of December 31, 2011 excludes $20 million of notes payable in our Brake North America and Asia group.
(5)Effective January 1, 2009, the Company changed the accounting for and reporting of minority interest (now called noncontrolling interest) in our consolidated financial statements as required under ASC Topic 810,“Consolidation.” Upon adoption, applicable prior period amounts have been retrospectively changed to conform. The noncontrolling interest was reclassified to the equity section of the balance sheet.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statements in the discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding the performance of our business and other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described under “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Item 6. Selected Consolidated and Combined Financial Data” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Company Overview

We areAffinia is a global leader in the lightmanufacturing and commercial vehicledistribution of global filtration products and replacement products in South America. We operate in the Filtration and services industry, which also is referredthe Affinia South America operating segments. In December 2013, we made the decision to engage in a plan to sell our Chassis group. An agreement was signed in January 2014 to divest our Chassis operations and the group qualified as the aftermarket. Our extensive aftermarket product offering consists principally of filtration, brakediscontinued operations (refer to Note 3. Discontinued Operation—Chassis).

The Filtration segment, Affinia’s largest, manufactures and chassis products. Ourdistributes filtration products fit heavyfor medium and mediumheavy-duty trucks, construction, agriculture, mining, and forestry vehicles, and light duty, trucks, light vehicles, equipment in the off-highway market (i.e., construction, mining, forestry and agricultural) and equipment for industrial, and marine applications. Our brakeThe Affinia South America segment has two operating divisions which manufacture and chassisdistribute replacement products fit lightfor on-road and off-road vehicles principally in Brazil. Based on Management’s estimates and heavy and medium duty trucks. In addition, we provide aftermarket products and distribution services in South America. We believe thatcertain information from third parties, Management believes for the growth of year ended 2013, Affinia holds:

the global aftermarket, from which we derived approximately 98% of our net sales in 2010, is predominantly driven by the size, age and use of the population of vehicles and equipment in operation. We design, manufacture, distribute and#1 market a broad range of aftermarket productsposition in North America South America, Europe and Asia and generatefor aftermarket filtration products

the #2 market position in Brazilian aftermarket parts distribution

Affinia’s continuing net sales in over 70 countries.for 2013 were approximately $1.4 billion. The following charts illustrate ourAffinia’s net sales by product grouping, together with major brandsgeography and the concentration of on and off-highway replacement product sales and OEM salessegment for continuing operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.2013.

We have successfully entered new markets in Europe and in Central and South America and have grown existing global market share in North America, Europe and South America. Additionally, our Affinia South America segment has grown significantly over the past several years.

We market our continuing products under a variety of well-known brands, including WIX®, RaybestosFiltronTM, Nakata®, NakataecoLAST®, Brake-Pro and ACDelco®, Filtron™, AIMCO® and McQuay-Norris®. Additionally, we provide private label products to large aftermarket distributors, including NAPA®, and CARQUEST® and ACDelco®, as well as co-branded products for Federated and ADN.. We believe that we have achieved our leading market positions due to the quality and reputation of our brands and products among professional installers, who are the primary decision makers for the purchase of the products we supply to the aftermarket.

We provide our primary customers with an extensive range of services which help build customer loyalty and generate repeat business while differentiating us from our competitors. These services include detailed product catalogs, e-catalogs, technical services, electronic data interchange, direct shipments of products and point-of-sale marketing materials. The depth of our value added services has led to numerous customer awards.

Our Filtration and Affinia South America segments fit with our strategic initiatives of growth and profitability. As shown in the chart below, the continuing operation net sales have grown significantly since our acquisition in November 2004.

Our Filtration segment has seen significant growth since 2004 as we have successfully entered new markets in Europe and in Central and South America and grown existing market share in North America, Europe and South America. We believe that we hold the #1 market position in North America for filtration products by net sales for the year ended December 31, 2013, and we also have a strong presence in Eastern Europe, including the #1 market position for filtration products in Poland.

Our Affinia South America segment has experienced rapid growth since 2004 in its distribution operations as we have invested to grow this business. Based on management estimates and certain information from third parties, we believe that we hold the #2 market position in Brazilian aftermarket parts distribution by net sales for the year ended December 31, 2013.

TransformationStrategic Focus

InWith the last five years,sale of the diversificationCommercial Distribution Europe group in 2010 and the distribution of the Brake North America and Asia group in 2012 to our shareholders, and the announced signing of an agreement to sell the Chassis group we have positioned ourselves to be a Filtration segment and Affinia South America segment company. With the realignment of our manufacturing locations has transformed us from a domesticcompany we are strategically aligned to a global manufacturergrow our presence in premium products in the industrial and automotive end markets. Additionally, we will expand our sales in our Affinia South America segment with a significant portionthe expansion of our manufacturing base in lower labor cost countries. We have accomplished this transformation by acquiring or opening new locations in low labor cost countriesadditional distribution capabilities and closing or selling our operations (i.e. Commercial Distribution Europe) in high labor cost countries. We are continuing to focus on growing our business in emerging markets as we continue to diversify our global manufacturing and distribution capabilities.further product expansion. We intend to continue expandinganalyze and pursue acquisition opportunities and joint ventures where we believe that we can add value and realize synergies by improving operating results through application of our global capabilitiesprocesses, as we pursuedemonstrated in our objective of becoming a world class on and off-highway replacement products and services company.existing businesses.

The charts below illustrate our global change in square footage and number of locations from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010.

The following are major transformation projectsexamples of some strategic initiatives we have completed orin our continuing operations:

Third quarter of 2013 – We purchased a small distributor of filtration products in the processUK at the beginning of completing:

the third quarter.

 

Third quarter of 2012 – We purchased the remaining 15% ownership interest in our filtration manufacturing facility in China.

First quarter of 2012 – Our Brazilian distribution company opened a new branch at the end of 2011, which began operating in the first quarter of 2012.

Second quarter of 2011 – During April 2011 we completed the construction of a filtration manufacturing facility in China, in which we have an 85% ownership interest. This facility manufactures products in China and distributes these products in Asia and North America. We began shipping products from this facility during the third quarter of 2011.

Second quarter of 2011 – We completed a new filtration facility in Poland and began shipping products in the second quarter of 2011. The facility was constructed to handle our increased production volumes in Poland and other European countries where we distribute products.

2010 and 2011 – Our Brazilian distribution company opened one new branch in 2010 plans on opening two new branches in 2011, and opened a new warehouse in January 2011. The new warehouse more than tripled our distribution company’s warehouse and distribution capacity in Brazil. The new branch has contributed to the growth in theof our Brazilian distribution company.

business.

 

Fourth quarter of 2010 – During the fourth quarter of 2010, we purchased the remaining 50% ownership in our India joint venture.

Fourth quarter of 2010 – We purchased substantially all the assets of NAPD, a chassis distributor in the fourth quarter of 2010.

Fourth quarter of 2010 – We initiated filter product distribution capabilities in Russia during the fourth quarter of 2010.

Russia.

Third quarter of 2010 – We formed a friction company in China during the third quarter of 2010, in which we have an 85% ownership interest, with the intention to manufacture products in China and distribute these products in Asia and North America. We anticipate that we will complete the manufacturing facility near the end of 2011.

First quarter of 2010 – We formed a filtration company in China during the first quarter of 2010, in which we have an 85% ownership interest, with the intention to manufacture products in China and distribute products principally in Asia. In the second quarter of 2010 we commenced construction of the filtration manufacturing facility. We anticipate that we will begin manufacturing filtration products in the first half of 2011.

Fourth quarter of 2008 – Effective October 31, 2008, we purchased an 85% controlling interest in Longkou Haimeng Machinery Company Limited (“Haimeng”), one of the world’s largest drum and rotor manufacturing companies. Haimeng has over 1 million square feet of modern manufacturing and machining capacity.

Fourth quarter of 2008 – We started production of brake products at a new facility in northern Mexico.

Fourth quarter of 2008 – We completed our 50% owned manufacturing site in India. We have ramped up to full capacity at this facility as of the end of the first quarter 2010.

Third quarter of 2007 – Our first filter manufacturing operation in Mexico opened in the third quarter of 2007. During 2008, the manufacturing operation was brought up to its full capabilities. This operation serves markets in both North America and Central America. We are expanding our distribution capabilities at this operation to increase our sales in the Mexican market.

Second quarter of 2007 – We opened a new filter manufacturing plant in Ukraine on April 1, 2007 to help meet increased demand for filtration products in Eastern Europe. The plant became fully operational in 2009.

Restructuring Activities

Comprehensive Restructuring

In 2005, we announced two restructuring plans: (i) a restructuring plan that we announced at the beginning of 2005 as part of the Acquisition, also referred to herein as the “acquisition restructuring” and (ii) a restructuring plan that we announced at the end of 2005, also referred to herein as the “comprehensive restructuring” (collectively, the “restructuring plans”). We have completed the acquisition restructuring and we are in the process of completing the comprehensive restructuring. We have closed or sold 71 facilities during the last six years and have shifted some of our manufacturing base to lower labor cost countries such as China, India, Ukraine and Mexico. Refer to the chart below for a breakout of the closed or sold facilities during the last six years.

Closed or sold
facilities since 2005

Acquisition restructuring

12

Comprehensive restructuring

36

Other restructuring

2

Quinton Hazell sale

21

Total

71

We initiated the acquisition restructuring to take advantage of opportunities that we identified prior to the Acquisition but that were difficult to actively pursue as part of Dana (i.e., consolidation of distribution facilities and manufacturing plants). Through the comprehensive restructuring we seek to lower costs and improve profitability by rationalizing manufacturing operations and to focus on low-cost sourcing opportunities. Such initiatives included the movement of manufacturing to lower cost facilities. The acquisition restructuring was completed at the end of 2005 and the comprehensive restructuring was essentially completed at the end of 2010. We anticipate $4 million additional comprehensive restructuring costs over the next couple of years related to the closure of the final facility, which was previously announced, and other costs related to closed facilities which we still own or lease. The major components of the comprehensive restructuring through 2010 were employee severance costs, asset impairment charges, and other costs (i.e. moving costs, environmental remediation, site clearance and repair costs) each of which we expect to represent approximately 41%, 18% and 41% respectively, of the total cost of the restructuring. The comprehensive restructuring will result in approximately $171 million in restructuring costs, which exceeds preliminary expectations of $152 million.

Our gross margin has grown over the last five years mainly due to the comprehensive restructuring as shown in the chart.

Other Restructuring

At the end of 2009, we approved the closure of our distribution operations located in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. The operations closed at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The closure of this operation was part of the Company’s continuing effort to improve its distribution system and serve the replacement parts market effectively and efficiently. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of $1 million and other trailing liabilities of $4 million. We incurred approximately $4 million in 2010 and $1 million in 2009 related to the closure of this facility. We anticipate another $2 million in restructuring costs in 2011 related to the closure of the facility.

On May 3, 2010, we announced the closure of our brake manufacturing operations located in Maracay, Edo Aragua, Venezuela. The operations closed during the second quarter of 2010. These actions resulted in the Company incurring pre-tax charges of approximately $7 million, of which approximately $4 million were cash expenditures. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of $3 million, asset impairments of $3 million, and other trailing liabilities of $1 million.

The following chart summarizes our restructuring activities for the comprehensive restructuring plan and other restructuring plans.

(Dollars in millions)  Total
Restructuring
Payments
      Discontinued
Operations
   Selling, General
and
Administrative
Expenses
   Cost of Sales   Total 

Comprehensive Restructuring

            

2005

  $—        $—      $2    $21    $23  

2006

   32       1     38     1     40  

2007

   37       12     23     3     38  

2008

   29       12     27     1     40  

2009

   15       2     10     1     13  

2010

   13       —       13     —       13  
                           

Total Comprehensive Cost

   126       27     113     27    $167  

Other Restructuring

            

2009

   —         —       1     —       1  

2010

   7       —       8     3     11  
                           

Total Other Restructuring Cost

   7       —       9     3     12  
                           

Total Restructuring Payments and Cost

  $133      $27    $122    $30    $179  
                           

Strategic Focus

Since we have essentially completed our comprehensive restructuring plan we have shifted our focus to global growth. We recently unveiled our World SmartTM business philosophy, which emphasizes a unique transformational approach to global manufacturing. The World Smart direction assures consistent product quality regardless of where a product is manufactured globally. As a World Smart company, we not only manufacture competitively priced products off-shore, but we do so in a manner that assures the highest possible quality. Our World Smart business strategy is based on four keys strategic elements: customer-centric focus, involved Affinia people, continual improvement and supplier relationships. The World Smart model vertically integrates manufacturing from product development to distribution.

Acquisitions and New Technology

On December 16, 2010, the Company, through its subsidiary Affinia Products Corp LLC, acquired substantially all the assets of NAPD, which is located in Ramsey, New Jersey. NAPD designs and engineers chassis products, which are manufactured by contractors in low labor cost countries. The NAPD acquisition expands our product offering of chassis parts to one of broadest in the industry. We acquired NAPD’s assets and liabilities for cash consideration of $52 million.

On December 3, 2010, the Company acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest in Affinia India Private Limited, the Company’s India joint venture, for $24 million in cash, increasing our ownership interest from 50% to 100%.

In January 2011, we introduced ecoLAST™ oil filters, a revolutionary line of heavy duty oil filters that has proven to double oil life. WIX ecoLAST oil filters capture dirt and soot like a traditional filter, while utilizing media to sequester the acids in the oil. WIX’s ecoLAST oil filters are a direct replacement with no changes or modification required to the vehicle. We expect the first ecoLAST oil filters to become available by April 2011.

Disposition

On February 2, 2010, as part of our strategic plan, we sold our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit for approximately $12 million reduced by post-closing purchase price adjustments of $1 million. Our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit, also known as Quinton Hazell, is a diverse aftermarket manufacturer and distributor of automotive components throughout Europe. Quinton Hazell’s financial performance did not meet our strategic financial metrics, as evidenced by a 2009 pre-tax loss of $84 million, of which $75 million related to an impairment of assets.

Amendment to ABL Revolver

On November 30, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the credit agreement governing the ABL Revolver. The ABL Revolver has been amended to, among other things, (a) increase the amount of additional unsecured indebtedness that we may incur from $100 million to $300 million and provide certain conditions to any issuance of such indebtedness in excess of $100 million, (b) amend the covenants with respect to: making certain dividends, distributions, restricted payments and investments; extending, renewing and refinancing certain existing indebtedness; amending certain material documents; and issuing and disposing of certain equity interests, (c) reduce the pricing spread applicable to each type of loan by 150 basis points at each level of average aggregate availability and remove the floor formerly applicable to the LIBOR rate and the BA rate, (d) extend the maturity date from August 13, 2013 to November 30, 2015 (subject to early termination under certain limited circumstances), (e) allow for prepayments of certain outstanding indebtedness with the proceeds of an initial public offering (if Holdings undertakes an initial public offering) and permit the merger of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. with and into Holdings upon satisfaction of certain preconditions to such merger and (f) modify certain other provisions thereof.

Issuance of Senior Subordinated Notes

On December 9, 2010, we completed an offering of the Additional Notes. The Additional Notes have been issued at a price equal to 100% of their face value. The Additional Notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated November 30, 2004, relating to our then outstanding $267 million aggregate principal amount of 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the “Initial Notes”). Other than with respect to the date of issuance and issue price, the Additional Notes have the same terms as, and are treated as a single class with, the Initial Notes. Affinia Group Inc.’s obligations under the Additional Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and certain of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The outstanding balance of the Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2010 was $367 million. We utilized the ABL Revolver to finance our purchase of the NAPD business and the remaining 50% interest in Affinia India Private Limited but subsequently used the proceeds of this note offering to repay the ABL Revolver borrowings that we incurred to finance these acquisitions. The proceeds of the note offering were also used to redeem $22.5 million in Secured Notes.

Redemption of Secured Notes

On December 31, 2010, we redeemed $22.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our Secured Notes, pursuant to their terms at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount of such notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

Nature of Business

We typically conduct business with our customers pursuant to short-term contracts andor purchase orders. However, our business is not characterized by frequent customer turnover due to the critical nature of long-term relationships in our industry. The expectation of quick turnaround times for car repairs and the broad proliferation of available part numbers require a large investment in inventory and strong fulfillment capabilities in order to deliver high fill rates and quick cycle times. Large aftermarket distributors typically source their product lines at a particular price point and product category with one “full-line” supplier, such as us, which covers substantially all of their product requirements. Switching to a new supplier typically requires that a distributor or supplier make a substantial investment to purchase, or “changeover” to, the new supplier’s products. In addition, the end user of our products, who is most frequently a professional installer, requires consistently high quality products because it is industry practice to replace, free of any labor or service charge, malfunctioning parts.

Business Environment

Our Markets.We believe that future growth in aftermarket product sales will be driven by the following key factors: (1) growth in global vehicle population; (2) growth in global commercial vehicle population; (3) increase in total miles driven in the United States and other key countries around the world; (4) increase in average age of light vehicles in the United States and other key countries around the world and (5) increase in vehicle related regulation and legislation. Growth in sales in the aftermarket does not always have a direct correlation to sales growth for aftermarket suppliers like us. For example, as automotive parts distributors have consolidated during the past several years, they have reduced purchases from manufacturers as they focused on reducing their combined inventories. The automotive distributors are also focused on reducing inventories due to the recent decline in miles driven.

Raw Materials and Manufactured Components.Our variable costs are proportional to sales volume and mix and are comprised primarily of raw materials, and labor and certain overhead costs. Our fixed costs are not significantly influenced by volume in the short term and consist principally of selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and other facility-related costs.

We use a broad range of manufactured components and raw materials in our products, including raw steel, steel-related components, filtration media, aluminum, brass, iron, rubber, resins, plastics, paper and packaging materials. We purchase raw materials from a wide variety of domestic and international suppliers, and we have not, in recent years, experienced any significant shortages of these items and normally do not carry inventories of these items in excess of those reasonably required to meet our production and shipping schedules.

Seasonality.Our working capital requirements are significantly impacted by the seasonality of the aftermarket. In a typical year, we build inventory during the first and second quarters to accommodate our peak sales during the second and third quarters. Our working capital requirements therefore tend to be highest from March through August. In periods of weak sales, inventory can increase beyond typical seasonal levels, as our product delivery lead times are less than two days while certain components we purchase from overseas require lead times of approximately 90 days.

Global Developments. The aftermarket has also experienced increased price competition from manufacturers based in China and other lower labor cost countries. We responded to this challenge by acquiring an 85% controlling interest in Haimeng, one of the largest drum and rotor manufacturers in the world and by expanding our manufacturing capacity in China, India, Mexico, Poland and Ukraine. Additionally, we are meeting this challenge through restructuring and outsourcing initiatives, as well as through ongoing cost reduction programs.

Results of Operations

In accordance with ASC Topic 360,205,Property, Plant, and Equipment,Presentation of Financial Statements, the Commercial Distribution Europe segmentChassis group and the Brake North America and Asia group qualified as a discontinued operation.operations. Previously reported consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect this segment as athe discontinued operation.operations.

Year Ended December 31, 20092012 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20102013

Net sales. Consolidated net sales increased by $194$102 million in 20102013 in comparison to 20092012 due mainly to favorable foreign currency translation effects of $26 million, improved market conditions and increased business from new and existing customers.our Filtration segment. The following table summarizes the consolidated net sales results for the years ended December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2010:2013:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
  Dollar
Change
  Percent
Change
  Currency
Effect(1)
 

Net sales

      

Filtration products

  $713   $759   $46    6 $(21

Brake North America and Asia products

   593    633    40    7  9  

Commercial Distribution South America products

   333    430    97    29  45  

Chassis products

   153    169    16    10  3  
                  

On and Off-highway segment

   1,792    1,991    199    11  36  

Brake South America segment

   22    15    (7  -32  (10

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (17  (15  2    12  —    
                  

Total net sales

  $1,797   $1,991   $194    11 $26  
                  
(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2013
   Dollar
Change
   Percent
Change
  Currency
Effect(1)
 

Net sales

        

Filtration segment

  $831   $902    $71     9 $(8

Affinia South America segment

   430    459     29     7  (51

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (2  —       2     NM    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $1,259   $1,361    $102     8 $(59
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)The currency effect was calculated by comparing the local currency net sales for all international locations for both periods, each at the current year exchange rate, to determine the impact of the currency between periods. These currency effects provide a more clearclearer understanding of the operating results of our foreign entities because they exclude the varying effects that changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have on those results.

NM (Not Meaningful)

OnFiltration segment sales increased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to increased sales of $22 million in our North American and Off-highway segment productsAsia operations driven by increased volume. The increased volume in North America was due to market growth and new business with existing customers. Additionally, our sales increased by $25 million and $24 million in our European and South American operations, respectively. The European sales increased due to higher sales in Poland, sales from our United Kingdom distribution company acquired in the following:

(1)Filtration products sales increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due in part to increased sales in our Polish operation and due to improving markets. Sales increased $43 million duethird quarter of 2013 and favorable currency translation effects in Poland. Our increased Venezuela filter sales were the main contributor to the improving U.S. and Canadian markets, $23 million due to our Polish operation gaining market share in Western and Eastern Europe and due to $1 million in additional volumes in other countries. The increased sales were offset by $21 million of unfavorable currency translations which were comprised of unfavorable currency translation effects in Venezuela of $31 million, favorable currency translation effects of $4 million related to Poland and an additional $6 million of favorable currency effects in three other countries.

(2)Brake North America and Asia products sales increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due to favorable currency translation effects of $9 million, improvement in market conditions and new business from new customers or existing customers. Additionally our Chinese operations increased sales by $14 million to third party customers in China and other countries in 2010 compared to 2009.

(3)Commercial Distribution South America products sales increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 partially due to favorable foreign currency translation effects of $45 million. The Brazilian Real weakened significantly in the first half of 2009 and then strengthened in the last half of the year and has remained strong in 2010. Excluding currency effects, sales grew by 16% in 2010 in comparison to 2009. This growth was due to improved market conditions, growth in our Brazilian distribution company and the introduction of motorcycle applications, heavy duty applications and related accessories. Our Brazilian distribution company sales grew significantly in 2010 and have grown since 2005 by 135%.

(4)Chassis products sales increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due to an improvement in general market conditions, new business and favorable currency translation effects of $3 million related to the Canadian Dollar. Additionally, sales increased due to new business with new customers and existing customers. During the fourth quarter we began shipping premium Chassis product to one of our largest customers, which accounted for an $8 million increase in sales in 2010.

Brake South America sales. Venezuela sales increased due to price increases and new business with existing and new customers partially offset by unfavorable currency translation effects.

Affinia South America segment products sales for 2010 decreasedincreased significantly in 2013 in comparison to 2009 due2012 but were negatively affected by the impact of currency translation. The majority of the sales increase related to our Brazilian master distribution business, warehouse distribution business and Argentinean distribution companies, where sales increased by $75 million before the effects of currency. Unfavorable currency translation effects of $51 million related mainly to the devaluationBrazilian Real and Argentinean Peso offset a large portion of the Venezuelan currency, which resulted in a decrease inAffinia South America segment sales of $10 million for 2010, offset partially by additional volumes in Venezuela and Uruguay.increase.

The following table summarizes the consolidated results for the years ended December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2010:2013:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 Dollar
Change
 Percent
Change
   Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 Dollar
Change
 Percent
Change
 

Net sales

  $1,797   $1,991   $194    11  $ 1,259   $1,361   $102    8

Cost of sales(1)

   (1,429  (1,581  (152  11   (967  (1,043  (76  8
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Gross profit

   368    410    42    11   292    318    26    9

Gross margin

   20  21     23  23  

Selling, general and administrative expenses(2)(1)

   (267  (290  (23  9   (172  (189  (17  10

Neovia legal settlement and costs

   —      (11  (11  NM  

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales

   15  15     14%   14%   
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating profit (loss)

          

On and Off-highway segment

   153    167    14    9

Brake South America segment

   (3  (8  (5  -167

Filtration segment

   122    132    10    8

Affinia South America segment

   32    36    4    13

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (49  (39  10    20   (34  (50  (16  -47
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating profit

   101    120    19    19   120    118    (2  -2

Operating margin

   6  6     10  9  

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

   8    (1  (9  NM  

Other income, net

   5    3    (2  -40

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   (1  (15  (14  NM  

Other income (loss), net

   3    (1  (4  -133

Interest expense

   (69  (66  3    -4   (63  (73  (10  16
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   45    56    11    24

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   59    29    (30  -51

Income tax provision

   (22  (27  (5  23   (45  (22  23    51

Equity in income, net of tax

   1    1    —      NM  

Equity in income (loss), net of tax

   1    (2  (3  NM  
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income from continuing operations, net of tax

   24    30    6    25   15    5    (10  -66

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)

   (61  —      61    NM  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(2)

   (117  5    122    104
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss)

   (37  30    67    NM     (102  10    112    110

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   7    6    (1  NM     1    —      (1  NM  
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(44 $24   $68    NM    $(103 $10   $113    110
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(1)We recorded $1 million and $3 million of restructuring costs in cost of sales for 2009 and 2010, respectively.
(2)We recorded $11 million and $21$6 million of restructuring costs in selling, general and administrative expenses for 20092012 and 2010, respectively.2013, respectively (refer to Note 16. Restructuring).
(3)(2)We recorded in our discontinued operations $2$20 million of restructuring costs in 2009 and no restructuring costs in 2010.for 2012.
NM(Not Meaningful)

NM   (Not Meaningful)

Gross profit/Gross margin.Gross profit increased by $42$26 million during 2010and the gross margin remained at 23% in 2013. Gross profit increased $26 million in 2013 in comparison to 2009. The gross profit in 2010 increased despite a 24% increase in freight costs. The increase in gross profit in during 2010 was primarily2012 due to an increase in sales volume of $36 million and lower material, freight and manufacturing costs of $4 million offset by unfavorable currency effects and thetranslation effects of our comprehensive restructuring. The comprehensive restructuring began at the end of 2005$11 million, and was essentially completed by the end of 2010. Due to the comprehensive restructuring, thean increase in operating costs as a percentageand distribution costs of sales decreased$3 million. The increase in 2010volume was driven by $20 million in comparison to 2009. The improvementour Filtration segment and $16 million in gross profit includes $13 million of favorable currency translation effects.Affinia South America segment.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $17 million in 2013 in comparison to 2012. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for 2010 increased $23 million from 20092012 were lower due to restructuringa favorable Satisfied legal settlement of $4 million, and our selling, general and administrative expenses payroll related costs, insurance related expenses, advertising, travel costs and professional fees. The restructuring costs increased $10for 2013 were higher due to $2 million in 2010 in comparisonone-time environmental costs, $5 million due to 2009, which was mainly related to our Brake North Americaan executive compensation agreement, and Venezuela operations. The payroll, advertising and travel costs increased $8$4 million related to improved marketthe transition of our corporate office.

Neovia legal settlement and economic conditionscosts.In connection with our prior sale of QHAL and its related companies to Klarius Group Ltd. (“KGL”), Affinia Group Inc. assigned a logistics service agreement to KGL, KGL agreed to indemnify Affinia Group Inc. against any liability under the Company. The remaining increase relates to an increase in insurance costslogistics service agreement and legal and professional fees. Offsetting these increases in 2010 was a reductionthe other companies in the management fee charged by Cypress from $3QHAL group agreed to provide a guarantee to Affinia Group Inc. against these liabilities. KGL and QHAL have both appointed administrators and we were notified that Neovia asserted a claim against Affinia Group Inc. for liabilities arising under the logistics service agreement. In January 2014, we settled these claims with Neovia for approximately $11 million in 2009 to no charge in 2010.including legal expenses.

Operating profit/Operating margin. Our operatingOperating profit increaseddecreased by $2 million in 20102013 in comparison to 20092012 due to an improvementa higher selling, general and administrative expenses in 2013 offset by higher gross profit. The operating profit in the Filtration segment increased in 2013 by $10 million in comparison to 2012 due to higher gross profit. The operating profit of the Affinia South America segment increased in 2013 by $4 million in comparison to 2012 due to higher gross profit. The increase in gross profit was driven by sales volume increases in our Filtration and an increase in sales volume. On and Off-highway segment operating profit increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due to the improved gross profit and increased sales. BrakeAffinia South America segment operating loss increased in 2010 due to the restructuring costs related to the closure of our Maracay, Venezuela manufacturing plant. In 2010,segments. Corporate, eliminations and other operating loss decreasedincreased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 by $10$16 million due mainly to lower generalthe Neovia legal settlement costs of $11 million, $5 million for an executive compensation agreement, and administrative expenses and due$4 million related to Cypress not charging us a management fee.the transition of our corporate office offset by certain cost reductions.

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt. In June of 2009 Affinia Group Holdings Inc. purchased in the open market approximately $33 million principal amount of the Subordinated Notes and thereafter contributed such notes to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., who contributed such notes to Affinia Group Inc. Affinia Group Inc. promptly surrendered such purchased notes for cancellation which resulted in a pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt of $8 million in 2009. The retirement of $22.5 million of Secured Notes on December 31, 2010 resulted in a pre-tax loss on extinguishment of debt of $1 million.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreasedincreased by $3 million in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due to lower refinancing costs in 2010 and offset by higher interest rates on our new debt structure. During 2009, we recognized $10 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was mainly due to one-time refinancing costs, related to replacing our former term loan facility, revolving credit facilitywhich included additional interest expense and accounts receivable facility and the terminationa write-off of our interest rate swap agreements. The refinancing consisted of the ABL Revolver and the Secured Notes, the proceeds of which were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and accounts receivable facility, as well as to settle interest rate derivatives and to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing. During 2010, we issued additional notes and amended the ABL Revolver, which resulted in payment ofunamortized deferred financing costs of $5 million.costs.

Income tax provision. The income tax provision increased by $5was $45 million and $22 million for 2010 in comparison to 2009 due mainly to a higher level of income from continuing operations.2012 and 2013, respectively. The effective tax rate was similar for both 2010higher in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to deemed distributions from certain foreign subsidiaries and 2009.the recognition of an uncertain tax position related to a foreign subsidiary.

LossIncome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax. As partIn 2013, the income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $5 million, which included the operational results of our strategic plan we committedChassis group. The loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in 2012 was $124 million for our Brake North America and Asia group, offset by $7 million in income for our Chassis group for a net $117 million. The $117 million discontinued operations, net of tax, is comprised of an $86 million impairment related to a plan to sell our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit during the fourth quarter of 2009. Subsequently, on February 2, 2010, we sold the business unit for approximately $12 million. Commercial Distribution Europe incurred aBrake North America and Asia group, operational loss of $61 million in 2009 of which $10$5 million related to loss on operations, $75our Brake North America and Asia group, $11 million of operational income related to our Chassis group and an impairment chargeincome tax provision related to reduce the carrying valuediscontinued operations of the business to expected realizable value, and offsetting these amounts was $24$37 million, which was primarily the result of a reversal of deferred tax assets related to a tax benefit to us resulting from this transaction. In 2010, the estimated loss was decreased $2 million offset by one month of operating losses of $1 million and a $1 million loss on post closing adjustments.distribution.

Net income (loss).Net income increased in 20102013 in comparison to 2009the net loss of 2012 due mainly to the decreasea $122 million increase in the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, andin the increase in gross profit in 2010.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax. Our net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax decreased due to our increase in ownership of our two most significant noncontrolling interests. We increased our ownership in Affinia Acquisition LLC from 5% to 40% effective on June 1, 2009 and to 100% effective on September 1, 2010. We acquired the remaining 50% interest in Affinia India Private Limited on December 3, 2010.current year.

Year Ended December 31, 20082011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20092012

Net sales. Consolidated net sales decreased by $118$7 million in 20092012 in comparison to 20082011 due mainly to unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $96 million.partially offset by increased sales to new and existing customers. The following table summarizes the consolidated net sales results for the years ended December 31, 20082011 and December 31, 2009:2012:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Dollar
Change
  Percent
Change
  Currency
Effect(1)
 

Net sales

      

Filtration products

  $727   $713   $(14  -2 $(47

Brake North America and Asia products

   658    593    (65  -10  (14

Commercial Distribution South America products

   368    333    (35  -10  (35

Chassis products

   155    153    (2  -1  (2
                  

On and Off-highway segment

   1,908    1,792    (116  -6  (98

Brake South America segment

   26    22    (4  -15  —    

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (19  (17  2    11  2  
                  

Total net sales

  $1,915   $1,797   $(118  -6 $(96
                  
(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Dollar
Change
  Percent
Change
  Currency
Effect(1)
 

Net sales

      

Filtration segment

  $801   $831   $30    4 $(19

Affinia South America segment

   469    430    (39  -8  (69

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (4  (2  2    50  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $1,266   $1,259   $(7  -1 $(88
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)The currency effect was calculated by comparing the local currency net sales for all international locations for both periods, each at the current year exchange rate, to determine the impact of the currency between periods. These currency effects provide a more clearclearer understanding of the operating results of our foreign entities because they exclude the varying effects that changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have on those results.

On and Off-highwayFiltration segment products sales decreased due to the following:

(1)Filtration products sales decreased in 2009 in comparison to 2008 due to unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $47 million, which were related to the weakening of the Polish Zloty, the Canadian Dollar, Ukraine Hryvnia and the Mexican Peso against the U.S. Dollar. Offsetting the translation effects were increased sales in our Polish and Venezuelan operations.

(2)Brake North America and Asia products sales decreased in 2009 in comparison to 2008 partially due to $14 million in unfavorable foreign currency translation effects. The decrease is also attributable to a decline in volume, which is related to the general softness in the aftermarket business relating to our branded products. Additionally, one of our customers ceased orders of certain of our brake products and as a result our sales decreased by $21 million. The same customer has increased its filtration orders so we anticipate only a marginal effect on our consolidated net sales. OES channels, which consist primarily of new vehicle manufacturers’ service departments at new vehicle dealerships, have also decreased orders due to recessionary pressures. In 2006, we began to discontinue OEM and co-manufacturing contracts, which were not profitable. The sales relating to these contracts have decreased since 2006 by approximately $100 million. The decrease relating to these contracts in 2009 in comparison 2008 was $9 million.

(3)Commercial Distribution South America products sales decreased in 2009 in comparison to 2008 due to unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $35 million. The general softness of the South American economies led to a decline in sales in most of our South American operations. However, our Brazilian distribution company offset the decline in sales as it continued to grow its market share even in unfavorable market conditions.

(4)Chassis products sales decreased in 2009 in comparison to 2008 due to unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $2 million, which were related to the weakening of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar.

Brake South America segment products sales for 2009 decreasedincreased in 2012 in comparison to 20082011 due to the closureincreased sales of a facility in Argentina in 2008. The closed facility had approximately $7$15 million in our North American and Asia operations driven by increased volume. Additionally, our sales increased by $34 million in 2008.our European and South American filter operations related to new customers and new business with existing customers. The closed facilityincreased sales were partially offset by unfavorable currency translation effects of $19 million, which mainly manufactured product for our Brake North America operations and Commercial Distributionrelated to the Polish Zloty.

Affinia South America operations. On a consolidated basis,segment sales decreased by $39 million in 2012 in comparison to 2011 due to $69 million of negative currency translation effects. Partially offsetting the closure did not resultdecrease were price increases on certain products and new business in a significant loss of sales.our Brazilian and Argentinean distribution companies and our Brazilian shock operations.

The following table summarizes the consolidated results for the years ended December 31, 20082011 and December 31, 2009:2012:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2008
 Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 Dollar
Change
 Percent
Change
   Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2011
 Consolidated
Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 Dollar
Change
 Percent
Change
 

Net sales

  $1,915   $1,797   $(118  -6  $ 1,266   $1,259   $(7  -1

Cost of sales(1)

   (1,546  (1,429  117    -8   (979  (967  12    -1
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Gross profit

   369    368    (1  —       287    292    5    2

Gross margin

   19  20     23%   23%   

Selling, general and administrative expenses(2)(1)

   (276  (267  9    –3   (175  (172  3    -2

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales

   14  15     14%   14%   
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating profit (loss)

          

On and Off-highway segment

   141    153    12    9

Brake South America segment

   (11  (3  8    73

Filtration segment

   105    122    17    16

Affinia South America segment

   34    32    (2  -6

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (37  (49  (12  -32   (27  (34  (7  -26
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Operating profit

   93    101    8    9   112    120    8    7

Operating margin

   5  6     9  10  

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   —      8    8    NM  

Other income (loss), net

   (3  5    8    267

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —     (1  (1  NM  

Other income, net

   4    3    (1  -25

Interest expense

   (56  (69  (13  23   (67  (63  4    -6
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   34    45    11    32

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   49    59    10    20

Income tax provision

   (18  (22  (4  22   (28  (45  (17  -61

Equity in income, net of tax

   —      1    1    NM     —     1    1    NM  
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income from continuing operations, net of tax

   16    24    8    50   21    15    (6  -29

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)(2)

   (19  (61  (42  NM     (93  (117  (24  -26
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net loss

   (3  (37  (34  NM     (72  (102  (30  -42

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      7    7    NM     1    1    —     NM  
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net loss attributable to the Company

  $(3 $(44 $(41  NM    $(73 $(103 $(30  -41
             

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(1)We recorded $1 million in restructuring costs in cost of sales in 2008 and 2009.
(2)We recorded $27 million and $11 million of restructuring costs in selling, general and administrative expenses for 2008 and 2009, respectively.2012.
(3)(2)We recorded in our discontinued operations $12 million and $2$20 million inof restructuring costs in 2008for 2011 and 2009,2012, respectively.
NM(Not Meaningful)

NM   (Not Meaningful)

Cost of sales/Gross profit/Gross margin.Gross profit increased by $5 million and the gross margin improved to 20%remained at 23% in 20092012. Gross profit increased $5 million in 2012 in comparison to 19% in 2008. In 2005 we embarked on the comprehensive restructuring to transform our brake operations from a domestic manufacturer to a global manufacturer and distributor. We have completed a significant portion of the comprehensive restructuring and as a result our gross margin improved2011 due to cost savings realized in 2009. This improvement washigher sales volume of $19 million, lower material and manufacturing costs of $4 million, lower distribution costs of $2 million offset by the strengtheningunfavorable currency translation effects of the U.S. Dollar which decreased the gross margin in 2009 in comparison to 2008 by $27$20 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for 20092012 decreased by $3 million from 20082011 due mainly to a reductiondecrease in restructuringadvertising and marketing costs of $16 million. Theand a higher restructuring expensesgain realized in 2008 werethe Satisfied settlement in 2012, partially offset by a substantial increase in legal and professional fees related to announcing the closureone-time special projects in 2012. We recognized gains of six facilities$2.5 million and $4 million in 20082011 and in contrast, we approved the closure of one facility in 2009. Offsetting the decrease in expense was a $3 million management fee charged by Cypress for services2012, respectively, related to the refinancing and other advisory services.Satisfied settlement.

Operating profit.profit/Operating margin.Operating profit increased by $8 million in 20092012 in comparison to 20082011 due to the increase ina higher gross margin resulting from cost savings generated from the comprehensive restructuring offset by the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar as discussed aboveprofit and the reduction inlower selling, general and administrative expenses. On and Off-highway segmentThe operating profit in the Filtration segment increased in 20092012 by $17 million in comparison to 2008 despite a 6% decrease in sales. Operating profit increased2011 due to an increase inhigher gross margin percentage andprofit, which was driven by a reduction in our selling, general and administrative costs. Brakesales volume increase. The operating profit of the Affinia South America segment decreased in 2012 by $2 million in comparison to 2012 due to lower gross profit, which was driven by unfavorable currency effects. Corporate, eliminations and other operating loss decreasedincreased in 20092012 in comparison to 2011 by $7 million due to the reduction in operating costs from the closure of an Argentina facility in the middle of 2008.

legal and professional fees related to special projects.

Gain on extinguishment of debt. In June of 2009 Affinia Group Holdings Inc. purchased in the open market approximately $33 million principal amount of the Subordinated Notes and thereafter contributed such notes to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., who contributed such notes to Affinia Group Inc. Affinia Group Inc. promptly surrendered such purchased notes for cancellation which resulted in a pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt of $8 million in 2009.

Interest expense.Interest expense increaseddecreased by $13$4 million during 2009in 2012 in comparison to 2008. On August 13, 2009 we refinanced our former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and accounts receivable facility. The refinancing consisted of the ABL Revolver and the Secured Notes, the proceeds of which were used2011 due to repay outstanding borrowings under our former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and accounts receivable facility, as well as to settle interest rate derivatives and to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing. We recorded a write-off of $5 million to interest expense for unamortizedlower debt issue costs associated with the former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and the accounts receivable facility. We also recorded $4.4 millionlevels in settlement costs and $0.2 million of accrued interest related to the termination of our interest rate swap agreements. The remaining increase in interest expense related to higher borrowing levels and rates.2012.

Income tax provision.provision. The income tax provision increased by $4was $28 million and $45 million for 20092011 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate was higher in 2012 in comparison to 20082011 due mainly to a higher level of incomedeemed distributions from continuing operations. The effective tax rates were comparable for both periods.certain foreign subsidiaries.

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. As part The loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in 2012 was $117 million compared to $93 million in 2011. The $117 million loss from discontinued operations, net of tax is comprised of an $86 million impairment related to our strategic plan we committed to a plan to sell our Commercial Distribution Europe business unit during the fourth quarter of 2009. Subsequently, on February 2, 2010, we sold the business unit for approximately $12 million, subject to post closing adjustments. Commercial Distribution Europe incurred aBrake North America and Asia group, operational loss of $5 million related to our Brake North America and Asia group, $11 million of operational income related to our Chassis group and an income tax provision related to discontinued operations of $37 million, which was primarily the result of a reversal of deferred tax assets related to the distribution. In 2011, the loss from discontinued operations related to our Brake North America and Asia group was $113 million and our Chassis group was $20 million discontinued operations income, net of tax. The $93 million Brake North America and Asia group discontinued operations was comprised of $165 million impairment and an operational loss of $9 million, the income tax benefit related to discontinued operations in 2011 was $61 million, in 2009 of which $10includes a $57 million relates to loss on operations, $75 million relates to an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the business to expected realizable value, and offsetting these amounts is $24 million which relates to a tax benefit related to us resulting from this transaction.the impairment, and $20 million discontinued operations income, net of tax related to our Chassis group.

Net loss.The increase in net loss was driven by the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in 2012 in comparison to 2011.

Results by Geographic Region

Net sales by geographic region were as follows:

   Year Ended December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011  2012  2013 

Net sales

    

United States

  $543   $555   $578  

Foreign

   723    704    783  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $1,266   $1,259   $1,361  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

United States sales as a percent of total sales

   43  44  42

Foreign sales as a percent of total sales

   57  56  58

United States. Net sales increased significantly in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to the increase in sales volume of our Filtration segment due to favorable market growth and new business with existing customers. Net sales increased in 2012 in comparison to 2011 due to higher sales in our Filtration segment.

Foreign. Net sales increased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to higher sales in Europe and South America. The European sales increased due to higher sales in Poland, sales from our United Kingdom distribution company acquired in the third quarter of 2013 and favorable currency translation effects. Our increased Venezuela filter sales were the main contributor to the increase in South America sales. Venezuela sales increased due to price increases and new business with existing and new customers, partially offset by unfavorable currency translation effects. Sales in our Brazil and Argentina distribution companies also increased. Net sales decreased in 2012 in comparison to 2011 due to unfavorable currency translation effects, partially offset by increased sales to new customers and new business with existing customers.

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest by geographic region was as follows:

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
(Dollars in millions)  2011  2012  2013 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

    

United States

  $(38 $(27 $(75

Foreign

   87    86    104  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

  $49   $59   $29  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

United States. Loss from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest increased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to the Neovia legal settlement costs, higher interest expense, an executive compensation agreement, and costs related to the transition of our corporate headquarters. Loss from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest increased in 2012 in comparison to 2011 due to a decrease in gross profit.

Foreign. Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest increased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to higher income in our Brazil, Poland and Venezuela operations. Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest decreased slightly in 2012 in comparison to 2011. The foreign income from continuing operations increasedbefore income tax provision, equity in 2009 in comparison to 2008. However, the net loss increased due to the increased loss in our discontinued operation.

Net income, attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax. The noncontrolling interest mainly relates to Affinia Acquisition LLC, which is further described in Note 5 Variable Interest Entity, which is included in Item 8 of this report. We started consolidating Affinia Acquisition LLC, a variable interest entity (“VIE”), during the fourth quarter of 2008. We increased our ownership from 5% to 40% effective on June 1, 2009. Therefore our noncontrolling interest related to Affinia Acquisition LLC, net of tax eliminates 95%and noncontrolling interest compared to the United States was higher due to interest expense in domestic operations and higher profitability of some of our foreign operations. The majority of our debt relates to our United States operations and as a consequence almost all of the VIE’s consolidated income for January through Mayassociated interest expense is allocated to our domestic operations. During 2013, our United States operations had $72 million of interest expense and 60% starting June 1, 2009, resulting in net income attributable to noncontrollingour foreign operations had $1 million of interest expense and during 2012, our United States operations had $62 million of $7interest expense and our foreign operations had $1 million in 2009.of interest expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary source of liquidity is cash flow from operations and available borrowings from our ABL Revolver. Our primary liquidity requirements are significant and are expected to be primarily for debt servicing, working capital restructuring obligations and capital spending. Our liquidity requirements are significant, primarily due to debt service requirements, restructuring and expected capital expenditures.

We are significantly leveraged as a result of the Acquisition in 2004, refinancing that occurred in 2009 and the issuance of Additional Notes in 2010.April 2013. As of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company had $696$937 million in aggregate indebtedness. As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had an additional $191$117 million of borrowing capacity available under our ABL Revolver after giving effect to $15$10 million in outstanding letters of credit, none of which was drawn against, and $3less than $1 million for borrowing base reserves. In addition, we had cash and cash equivalents of $65$51 million and $55$101 million as of December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2010,2013, respectively. We had $32 million of cash and cash equivalents outside the United States, of which approximately $26 million is considered permanently reinvested for funding ongoing operations outside of the U.S. If such permanently reinvested funds are needed for operations in the U.S., the Company would be required to accrue additional tax expense, primarily related to foreign withholding taxes.

We spent $55 million, $27 million and $31 and $52 million onin capital expenditures during 20092011, 2012 and 2010, respectively.2013, respectively, which included $28 million, $10 million and $4 million in capital expenditures related to discontinued operations. The cash flow from operations on an annual basis has historically been adequate to meet our liquidity needs. Based on the current level of operations, the Company believeswe believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under itsour ABL Revolver, will be adequate to meet our short-termshort term and long-termlong term liquidity needs.

ABL Revolver.Our ABL Revolver consistsmatures in April 2018, our Senior Notes mature in May 2021, our Term Loan B-1 matures in April 2016 and our Term Loan B-2 matures in April 2020. If we were to undertake a significant acquisition or capital improvement plan, we may need additional sources of liquidity. We expect to meet any such liquidity needs by entering into new or additional credit facilities and/or offering new or additional debt securities, but whether such sources of liquidity will be available to us at any given point in the future will depend on a number of factors that are outside of our control, including general market conditions.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, we made the decision to engage in a plan to sell our Chassis group. An agreement was signed in January 2014 to divest our Chassis group. We anticipate receiving $150 million, plus or minus an adjustment reflecting an estimate of the working capital, in cash for the sale of our Chassis group in 2014. We anticipate using some of the cash proceeds to reduce our debt levels.

ABL Revolver

We replaced our existing asset-based credit facility (the “Old ABL Revolver”) with a new ABL Revolver on April 25, 2013. The ABL Revolver comprises a revolving credit facility. Our ABL Revolver provides for loans in a total principal amountfacility of up to $315$175 million for borrowings available solely to the U.S. domestic borrowers, including (a) a $30 million sub-limit for letters of credit and (b) a $15 million swingline facility. Availability under the ABL Revolver is based upon monthly (or more frequent under certain circumstances) borrowing base valuations of our eligible inventory and accounts receivable, among other things, and is reduced by certain reserves in effect from time to time.

At December 31, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver. We had an additional $117 million of which $90availability after giving effect to $10 million in outstanding letters of credit and less than $1 million for borrowing base reserves as of December 31, 2013.

Maturity. The ABL Revolver is scheduled to mature on April 25, 2018.

Guarantees and collateral. The indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under the ABL Revolver are unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis by the Company and certain of its current and future U.S. subsidiaries, and are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions and exclusions, by a first-priority lien on accounts receivable, inventory, cash, deposit accounts, securities accounts and proceeds of the foregoing and certain assets related thereto and a second-priority lien on the collateral that secures the Term Loans on a first-priority basis.

Mandatory prepayments. If at any time the outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver (including outstanding letters of credit and swingline loans) exceed the lesser of (i) the borrowing base as in effect at such time and (ii) the aggregate revolving commitments as in effect at such time, the borrowers will be required to prepay an amount equal to such excess and/or cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit.

Voluntary prepayments. Subject to certain conditions, the ABL Revolver allows the borrowers to voluntarily reduce the amount of the revolving commitments and to prepay the loans without premium or penalty other than customary breakage costs for LIBOR rate contracts.

Interest rates and fees. Outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) a base rate plus the applicable spread, as set forth below or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread, as set forth below. Swingline loans bear interest at a base rate plus the applicable spread. The Company will pay a commission on letters of credit issued under the new ABL Revolver at a rate equal to the applicable spread for loans based upon the LIBOR rate.

Level

  Average
Aggregate
Availability
  Base Rate Loans and
Swingline Loans
  LIBOR Loans 

I

  <$50,000,000   1.00  2.00

II

  > $50,000,000

but<

$100,000,000

   0.75  1.75

III

  >$100,000,000   0.50  1.50

The borrowers will pay certain fees with respect to the ABL Revolver, including (i) an unused commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the credit facility of 0.25% per annum in the event that more than 50% of the commitments (excluding swingline loans) under the credit facility are utilized, and 0.375% per annum in the event that less than or equal to 50% of the commitments (excluding swingline loans) under the credit facility are utilized and (ii) customary annual administration fees and fronting fees in respect of letters of credit equal to 0.125% per annum on the stated amount of each letter of credit outstanding during each fiscal quarter. During an event of default, all loans and other obligations under the ABL Revolver may bear interest at a rate 2.00% in excess of the otherwise applicable rate of interest.

Cash Dominion. Commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 12.5% of the total borrowing base and $17.5 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability has been greater than such thresholds at all times for 60 consecutive days, amounts in the Company’s deposit accounts and the deposit accounts of the guarantors (other than certain excluded accounts) will be transferred daily into a blocked account held by the administrative agent and applied to reduce the outstanding amounts under the ABL Revolver.

Covenants. The ABL Revolver contains negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: create liens and encumbrances; incur additional indebtedness; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of their capital stock; amend certain material governance documents; change the nature of the business of the borrowers and their subsidiaries; redeem or repurchase capital stock or prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change the borrowers’ fiscal periods; and enter into certain restrictive agreements. The ABL Revolver also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a change of control.

In addition, commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 10.0% of the total borrowing base and $15.0 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability under the ABL Revolver has been greater than such thresholds at all times, in each case, for 30 consecutive days, the Company will be required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0x measured for the last 12-month period. As of March 31, 2014, the Company remained in compliance with all debt covenants. The fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.05x as of December 31, 2013. If none of the covenant triggers have occurred, the impact of falling below the fixed charge coverage ratio would not be a default but instead would limit our ability to pursue certain operational or financial transactions (e.g. acquisitions).

Indenture

Senior Notes.On April 25, 2013, Affinia Group Inc. issued $250 million of Senior Notes as part of the refinancing. The Senior Notes accrue interest at the rate of 7.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Senior Notes will mature on May 1, 2021. The terms of the Indenture provide that, among other things, the Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment to all of the Company’s and all of Affinia Group Inc.’s 100% owned current and future domestic subsidiaries, (the “Guarantors”) existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s and Guarantors’ existing and future subordinated debt. The Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all of the liabilities and obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are effectively junior in right of payment to all of the Company’s and the Guarantors’ secured indebtedness, including the Term Loans and the ABL Revolver, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The outstanding balance of the Senior Notes at December 31, 2010,2013 was $250 million.

Guarantees. The Guarantors guarantee the Company’s obligations under the Notes on a senior unsecured basis.

Interest Rate. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 7.75% per annum. Interest on the Notes is payable in cash semiannually in arrears on May 1 and it matures in 2015.November 1 of each year.

Subordinated NotesOther Covenants. The Indenture contains affirmative and Senior Secured Notes Indenture. The indentures governingnegative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the notes limit our (and most or allCompany’s ability (as well as those of our subsidiaries’) ability tothe Company’s subsidiaries) to: incur additional indebtedness,debt; provide guarantees and issue mandatorily redeemable preferred stock; pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments including the prepayment of certain indebtedness; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; enter into transactions with affiliates; create or incur liens; and merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of its assets.

Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare the principal, premium, if any, interest and other monetary obligations on all the Notes to be due and payable immediately.

Term Loan Facility

On April 25, 2013, the Company entered into (i) a Term Loan B-1 in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million and (ii) a Term Loan B-2 in an aggregate principal amount of $470 million. The Term Loan B-1 was offered at a price of 99.75%, of their face value, resulting in approximately $199 million of net proceeds for the Term Loan B-1. The Term Loan B-2 was offered at a price of 99.50%, of their face value, resulting in approximately $468 million of net proceeds for the Term Loan B-2. The $1 million and $2 million original issue discount for the Term Loan B-1 and Term Loan B-2, respectively, will be amortized based on the effective interest rate method and included in interest expense until the Term Loans mature. The Term Loan B-1 amortizes in quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1.00% per annum, with the balance due on April 25, 2016. The Term Loan B-2 amortizes in quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1.00% per annum, with the balance due on April 25, 2020. As of December 31, 2013, $199 million principal amount of Term Loan B-1 was outstanding, net of a $1 million issue discount which is being amortized until the Term Loan B-1 matures and $465 million principal amount of Term Loan B-2 was outstanding, net of a $2 million issue discount which is being amortized until the Term Loan B-2 matures.

Guarantees and collateral. The indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under the Term Loan Facility are unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis by the Company and certain of its current and future U.S. subsidiaries, and are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions and exclusions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the borrower and each guarantor (including (i) a perfected pledge of all of the capital stock of the borrower and each direct, wholly-owned material subsidiary held by the borrower or any guarantor (subject to certain limitations with respect to foreign subsidiaries) and (ii) perfected security interests in, and mortgages on, equipment, general intangibles, investment property, intellectual property, material fee-owned real property, intercompany notes and proceeds of the foregoing) except for certain excluded assets and the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first priority basis, and a second-priority lien on the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first-priority basis.

Mandatory prepayments. The Term Loan Facility requires the following amounts to be applied to prepay the Term Loans, subject to certain thresholds, exceptions and reinvestment rights: 100% of the net proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness), 100% of the net proceeds of certain asset sales (including insurance or condemnation proceeds), other than the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first-priority basis, and 50% of excess cash flow with stepdowns to 25% and 0% based on certain leverage targets.

Mandatory prepayments will be allocated ratably between Term Loan B-1 and Term Loan B-2 and, within each, will be applied to reduce remaining amortization payments in the direct order of maturity for the immediately succeeding eight quarters and, thereafter, pro rata.

Voluntary prepayments. The Company may voluntarily prepay outstanding Term Loans in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty (other than a 1.00% premium payable until, in the case of the Term Loan B-1, six months following April 25, 2013 and, in the case of the Term Loan B-2, one year following April 25, 2013, on (i) the amount of loans prepaid or refinanced with proceeds of long-term bank debt financing or any other financing similar to such borrowings having a lower effective yield or (ii) the amount of loans the terms of which are amended to the same effect), subject to payment of customary breakage costs in the case of LIBOR rate loans. Optional prepayments of the Term Loans will be applied to the remaining installments thereof at the direction of the Company.

Interest rates. Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) a base rate plus the applicable spread or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread. The applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan B-1 is 1.75% with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.75% with respect to LIBOR rate borrowings, and the applicable margin for borrowing under the Term Loan B-2 is 2.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and 3.50% with respect to LIBOR rate borrowings. The LIBOR rate is subject to a floor of 0.75% per annum with respect to Term Loan B-1 and 1.25% per annum with respect to Term Loan B-2. Overdue principal with respect to the Term Loans will bear interest at a rate 2.00% in excess of the otherwise applicable rate of interest and other overdue amounts with respect to the Term Loans will bear interest at a rate of 2.00% in excess of the rate applicable to base rate borrowings.

Covenants. The Term Loan Facility contains negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to create liens and encumbrances; incur additional indebtedness; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of their capital stock; amend certain material governance documents; change the nature of the business of the borrower and its subsidiaries; redeem or repurchase our capital stock makeor prepay, redeem or repurchase certain investments,debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change the borrower’s fiscal periods; and enter into certain typesrestrictive agreements. The Term Loan Facility also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of transactions with affiliates, use assets as security in other transactions and sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, Affinia and its restricted subsidiaries are permitted to incur additional indebtedness,default, including secured indebtedness, under the termsa change of the notes.

control.

Net cash provided by operating activities

In 2010, the cash flow from operating activities was a $23 million source of cash in comparison to a $55 million source of cash in 2009 and a $48 million source of cash during 2008. There were significant changes in the following operating activities:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December  31,
2008
  Year Ended
December  31,
2009
  Year Ended
December  31,
2010
 

Summary of significant changes in operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

  $(3 $(37 $30  

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

   —      (8  1  

Write off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   —      5    1  

Change in trade accounts receivable

   31    3    (14

Change in inventories

   (39  42    (77

Impairment of assets

   2    75    —    

Change in other current operating liabilities

   57    (42  39  
             

Subtotal

   48    38    (20

Other changes in operating activities

   —      17    43  
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $48   $55   $23  

Net income (loss) – Net income increased in 2010 in comparison to 2009 due to the decrease in the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. We recorded a $75 million impairment related to our Commercial Distribution Europe segment in 2009, which was sold on February 2, 2010.

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt – The retirement of $33 million of Subordinated Notes duringDuring the second quarter of 2009 resulted in a pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt of $8 million. The retirement of $22.5 million of Secured Notes during the fourth quarter of 2010 resulted in a pre-tax loss on the extinguishment of debt of $1 million.

Write-off of debt issuance costs – We2013, we recorded a write-off of $5 million in 2009 to interest expense for unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the retirementredemption of our Secured Notes and Subordinated Notes. We also recorded during the second quarter of 2013 a write-off of $3 million to interest expense for the replacement of our Old ABL Revolver with a new ABL Revolver. In addition, we recorded $14 million in total deferred financing costs related to the issuance of our Senior Notes and Term Loans as part of the term loan facility, revolving credit facilityrefinancing and the accounts receivable facility. We wrote off $1 million in total deferred financing costs associated with the ABL Revolver. The unamortized deferred financing costs will be charged to interest expense over the next eight years for the Senior Notes, seven years for Term Loan B-2, five years for ABL Revolver and three years for Term Loan B-1.

Subsequent Event

On February 4, 2014, we entered into (i) the First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2014 (the “Term Loan Amendment”), among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, as administrative agent and the lenders party thereto and (ii) the First Amendment to the ABL Credit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2014 (the “ABL Amendment”), among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., certain subsidiaries party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A, as administrative agent. The Term Loan Amendment and the ABL Amendment are referred to herein collectively as the “Amendments.”

The Amendments, among other things, amend certain negative covenants to permit the sale of the Chassis group and to permit certain restricted payments and loans and advances to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. The Term Loan Amendment also amends certain prepayment terms in 2010connection with the Chassis sale.

The ABL Amendment contains additional amendments which, among other things, (i) reduce the dominion threshold to the greater of 12.5% of the total borrowing base and $12.5 million and (ii) amend the trigger period such that, commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 10.0% of the total borrowing base and $10.0 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability under the ABL Revolver has been greater than such thresholds at all times, in each case, for 30 consecutive days, the Company is required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 1.0x measured for the last 12-month period.

Cash Flows

Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities including continuing and discontinued operations is summarized in the tables below for the years ended 2011, 2012 and 2013:

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities is summarized in the table below for the years ended 2011, 2012 and 2013:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Summary of significant changes in operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

  $(72 $(102 $10  

Change in trade accounts receivable

   14    23    6  

Change in inventories

   8    (22  (3

Impairment of assets in discontinued operations

   166    86    —   

Change in other current operating liabilities

   (47  38    24  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   69    23    37  

Other changes in operating activities

   (55  74    62  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $14   $97   $99  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) – Net loss increased in 2012 in comparison to 2011 due to a higher loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. Net income increased in 2013 in comparison to 2012 due to a higher income from discontinued operations, net of tax. The higher net income in 2013 in discontinued operations, net of tax, is due to a large impairment that was recorded in 2012. The significant losses in 2011 and 2012 related to the extinguishment of $22.5 million of Secured Notes during the fourth quarter of 2010.impairments to our Brake North America and Asia group, which was deconsolidated in 2012.

Change in trade accounts receivable – Our accounts receivable decreased in 20082011 mainly due to the timing of payments in the United States. Our accounts receivable decreased in 2012 due to timing of payments and 2009 and increaseddue in 2010part to our sale of accounts receivable under factoring programs. Our accounts receivable decreased in 2013 mainly due to the timing of payments in the United States.

Change in inventories – The change in inventories was an $8 million source of cash in 2011, a $77$22 million use of cash in 20102012 and a $42$3 million sourceuse of cash in 2009. The reduction2013. Due to a decrease in miles driven and other factors, we began focusing on reducing inventory levels during the second half of 2011 which resulted in 2009 was duea decrease from the second quarter of 2011 until the end of 2011. In 2012, inventory increased to keep up with higher volumes in our Filtration and Affinia South America segments. Our chassis product inventory increased in 2012 because we purchased product and raw materials at a similar rate as 2011 but our volume decreased in 2012. In 2013, inventory increased to keep up with higher volumes in our Filtration segment. Our chassis product inventory decreased in 2013 as we made a concerted effort to reduce inventories due to the economic downturn. In 2008, our inventory increased mainly due to increases in Brazil and other international locations. Our Brazilian operations were experiencing record sales in 2008 and, as a result, built up inventory to keep up with demand. In 2010, we built up inventory to keep up with increased demand, which was due to improving market conditions inlevels from the aftermarket industry, new business with new customers and additional business with existing customers.previous year.

Change in other current operating liabilities – The change in other current operating liabilities was a $39 million source of cash during 2010, a $42$47 million use of cash in the 2009 and2011, a $57$38 million source of cash in 2008.2012 and a $24 million source of cash in 2013. The changes over the last three years were primarily due to accounts payable, which was a $38 million source of cash in 2010, a $54 million use of cash in 2009 and2011, a $45$25 million source of cash in 2008.2012 and a $1 million use of cash in 2013. Accounts payable fluctuates from quarter to quarter due to the timing of payments. In addition to the change in payables, the accrued expenses related to such items as the Neovia accrual, the executive compensation accrual and the restructuring accrual increased in 2013.

Net cash used in investing activities

The following table summarizes investing activities:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December  31,
2008
  Year Ended
December  31,
2009
  Year Ended
December  31,
2010
 

Investing activities

    

Proceeds from sales of assets

  $1   $—     $1  

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   (50  —      (51

Proceeds from sales of affiliates

   6    —      11  

Investment in affiliate

   (6  —      —    

Change in restricted cash

   (1  (5  (3

Additions to property, plant and equipment

   (25  (31  (52

Other investing activities

   —      —      (4
             

Net cash used in investing activities

  $(75 $(36 $(98

Net cash used in investing activities is summarized in the table abovebelow for the years ended 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010. 2013:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Investing activities

    

Proceeds from sales of assets

  $9   $4   $—    

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   (1  —      (1

Change in restricted cash

   5    —      —    

Additions to property, plant and equipment

   (55  (27  (31

Other investing activities

   3    —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  $(39 $(23 $(32
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The changes in investing activities are mainly comprised of the following:

Proceeds from sales of assets – The proceeds from sales of assets in 2011 of $9 million were mainly due to the sale of Venezuelan and Canadian facilities, which were part of our restructuring plans. In 2012, we sold certain assets in our Juarez, Mexico facility.

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired – Affinia Hong Kong Limited was acquired in 2008 for $50 million. The–The NAPD business was acquired for an original payment of $51 million in 2010 andhad a $1 million payment in 2011 for a working capital settlement. In 2013 we purchased a small distributor of filtration products in the UK at the beginning of the third quarter.

Additions to property, plant and equipment – The additions to property, plant and equipment, which included our discontinued operations, increased significantly in 20102011 due to the expansion in China for new frictionbrake and filtration facilities and for the expansion of our PolishPoland and BrazilianBrazil operations. The total additionsdecrease in 2012 in comparison to property, plant and equipment2011 was due to our completion of the investments made in 2011 in filtration manufacturing plants in China, Poland and Brazil increased $21the United States. The 2013 capital expenditures were slightly higher than the prior year due to higher capital spending in our Filtration segment. The Brake North America and Asia group had $28 million and $10 million in 2010 from 2009.capital expenditures in 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December  31,
2008
   Year Ended
December  31,
2009
  Year Ended
December  31,
2010
 

Financing activities

     

Net increase in other short-term debt

  $—      $—     $13  

Proceeds from Subordinated Notes

   —       —      100  

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —       —      (23

Payments on senior term loan facility

   —       (297  —    

Capital contribution

   50     —      3  

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —       (22  (5

Proceeds from Secured Notes

   —       222    —    

Net proceeds from ABL Revolver

   —       90    —    

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —       (25  (24

Other

   1     (3  2  
              

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  $51    $(35 $66  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities is summarized in the table abovebelow for the years ended 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010. 2013:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Financing activities

    

Net increase (decrease) in other short-term debt

  $(6 $(4 $—    

Payments of other debt

   (10  (2  —    

Repayment on Subordinated Notes

   —      —      (367

Repayments of Term Loans

   —      —      (3

Proceeds from Senior Notes

   —      —      250  

Proceeds from Term Loans

   —      —      667  

Proceeds from other debt

   20    —      —    

Net proceeds from (payments of) ABL Revolver

   20    (110  —    

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —      (23  (195

Capital contribution

   2    —      —    

Dividend to Shareholder

   —      —      (352

Proceeds from BPI’s new credit facility

   —      76    —    

Cash related to the deconsolidation of BPI

   —      (11  —    

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —      (1  (15

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —      (3  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  $26   $(78 $(15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The changes in financing activities are mainly comprised of the following:

On December 9, 2010,2013 Refinancing - In 2013, we completed an offeringrefinanced our existing notes and credit facilities. The refinancing consisted of $250 million of Senior Notes due 2021, a $200 million Term Loan B-1 due 2016, and a $470 million Term Loan B-2 due 2020, the Additional Notes. The issuanceproceeds of the Additionalwhich we used, together with $31 million of cash on hand, to redeem our Secured Notes and our Subordinated Notes, make a distribution of $350 million to Holdings and pay fees and expenses in connection with the amendmentrefinancing transactions. We had two other minor transactions, each for $1 million that increased the distribution to our shareholder to $352 million during 2013.

Net increase (decrease) in other short-term debt — During 2011, our China brake operation was able to decrease its short term debt due to a reduction in purchases of inventory.

Proceeds from other debt — The change in 2011 was due to our Poland subsidiary increasing its debt by $20 million.

Net proceeds from (payments of) ABL Revolver — We had $20 million of additional borrowings outstanding at the end of 2011 on our ABL Revolver. The additional borrowings in 2011 were needed to fund the additional operational needs related to increased levels of capital spending and higher levels of working capital. In 2012, we were able to reduce the ABL Revolver due to the cash provided by operating activities and the $70 million we received prior to the distribution of BPI to Holdings’ shareholders.

Repayment on Secured Notes —We redeemed $22.5 million of our Secured Notes using cash provided by operating activities in 2010 resulted in payment of deferred financing costs of $5 million.June 2012. We utilizedrepaid the ABL Revolver to finance our purchaseremaining balance of the NAPD business and the remaining 50% interest in Affinia India Private Limited but subsequently we used the proceeds of this note offering to repay the ABL Revolver borrowings that we incurred to finance these acquisitions. The proceeds of the note offering were also used to redeem $22.5 million in Secured Notes on December 31, 2010.in connection with the refinancing in 2013.

In the third quarter of 2009, we refinanced a portion of our then-existing debt. We settled the former term loan facility by paying $287 million.Capital contributions — The refinancing included sources of cash of $222 million from the Secured Notes. We also had $90 million of net borrowings on the new ABL Revolver and $22 million of fees and other associated financing costs.

Effective June 1, 2009, Affinia Group Inc. acquired an additional 35% ownership interest in Affinia Acquisition LLC for a purchase price of $25 million, which increased its ownership to 40%. The $25 million reduced our noncontrolling interest balance in 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest in Affinia India Private Limited, our India joint venture, for $24 million in cash, increasing our ownership interest from 50% to 100%. The $24 million reduced our noncontrolling interest balance in 2010.

Contributions - The source of cash in 2008 was mainly comprised of a $50 million contribution to Affinia Acquisition LLC from Affinia Group Holdings Inc., which was used to purchase 85% of Affinia Hong Kong Limited. The $3$2 million source of cash in 20102011 related to a contributioncontributions from Mr. Zhang Haibo, who ownsowned 15% of Affinia Hong Kong Limited. The contribution was used to facilitate2011 contributions provided additional funding for the purchase of land for a new filtration company in China and facilitated the establishment of a new brake company in China which manufactures friction products and distributes these products in Asia and North America.

Proceeds from BPI’s new credit facility and Cash related to the deconsolidation of BPI — In connection with the intentiondistribution of our Brake North America and Asia group to manufacture productsHoldings’ shareholders, the Company received a $70 million dividend from BPI, which BPI funded through borrowings of $76 million under a new credit facility that is not guaranteed by, or an obligation of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries. BPI had $11 million of cash on the date of the distribution that was not retained by us.

Purchase of noncontrolling interest —During the third quarter of 2012, we purchased the remaining 15% ownership interest in China and distribute filtration products principally in Asia.Longkou Wix Filtration Co. Ltd for $3 million.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Cash obligations.Under various agreements, we are obligated to make future cash payments in fixed amounts. These include payments under debt obligations at maturity, under operating lease agreements, and under purchase commitments for property, plant, and equipment. The following table summarizes our fixed cash obligations over various future periods as of December 31, 2010:2013:

 

   Payments Due By Period 

Contractual Cash Obligations*

  Total   Less
than
1 year
   1 – 3
Years
   4 – 5
years
   After
5  Years
 
   (Dollars in Millions) 

Debt obligations**

  $698    $27    $12    $457    $202  

Interest on Subordinated Notes

   129     33     66     30     —    

Interest on Secured Notes

   122     22     44     43     13  

Interest on ABL Revolver***

   19     4     8     7     —    

Operating leases

   66     12     24     16     14  

Post employment obligations

   3     2     —       —       1  

Purchase commitments for property, plant, and equipment

   13     13     —       —       —    
                         

Total contractual obligations

  $1,050    $113    $154    $553    $230  
                         
   Payments Due By Period 

Contractual Cash Obligations(1)

  Total   Less
than
1 year
   1 – 3
Years
   4 – 5
years
   After
5 Years
 
   (Dollars in Millions) 

Debt obligations(2)

  $937    $30    $206    $9    $692 

Interest on debt obligations(3)

   304     50     95     85     74 

Operating leases(4)

   50     9     15     14     12  

Purchase commitments for property, plant, and equipment

   8     8     —      —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $1,299    $97    $316    $108    $778  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*(1)Excludes the $2$8 million reserve for income taxes under ASC Topic 740,“Income Taxes," as we are unable to reasonably predict the ultimate timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes.
**(2)Excludes $2$3 million discount on the Secured Notes.Term Loans.
***(3)The ABL Revolver includes a margin on LIBOR borrowings that varies from 2.25% to 2.75%Interest payments based on availability undervariable interest rates were determined using the facility. Atinterest rate in effect at December 31, 2010, the margin was 2.50%.2013.
(4)Excludes $4 million of operating leases for our Chassis group, which is classified in discontinued operations.

Commitments and Contingencies

We are party to various pending judicial and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. These include, among others, proceedings based on product liability claims and alleged violations of environmental laws.

On January 28, 2013, Walker Morris, counsel for Neovia, notified us that Quinton Hazell Automotive Limited (“QHAL”) intended to appoint administrators (comparable to a bankruptcy filing in the United States) and that Neovia may pursue a claim against us for liabilities arising out of a Logistics Services Agreement dated May 5, 2006 among Neovia, QHAL and Affinia Group Inc. (the “LSA”). In connection with our prior sale of QHAL and its related companies to Klarius Group Ltd. (“KGL”), Affinia Group Inc. assigned the LSA to KGL, KGL agreed to indemnify Affinia Group Inc. against any liability under the LSA and the other companies in the QHAL group agreed to provide a guarantee to Affinia Group Inc. against these liabilities. KGL and QHAL have both appointed administrators. By letter dated February 15, 2013, Neovia, through its counsel Walker Morris, notified us that Neovia is asserting a claim against Affinia Group Inc. for liabilities arising under the LSA, including asserted unpaid invoices totaling 5.7 million pounds. On March 28, 2013, we were served with a demand for arbitration by Neovia. We filed our response on April 29, 2013. In the first quarter of 2014, we settled the claim with Neovia for approximately $11 million including legal expenses. We have various accruals for contingent liability costs associated with pending judicial and administrative proceedings (excluding environmental liabilities described below). We had $1 million and $2$13 million accrued at December 31, 20092012 and 2010,2013, respectively. There are no recoveries expected from third parties. If there is a range of equally probable outcomes, we accrue the lower end of the range.

The fair value of an ARO is required to be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, with the offsetting associated asset retirement costs capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The ARO is subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method over its useful life. Changes in the ARO liability resulting from the passage of time are recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and an accretion to expense. Changes resulting from revisions to the timing or amount of the original estimate of cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease in both the asset and liability. Our ARO liability recorded at December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 20102013 was $2$1 million, and the accretion for 20092012 and 20102013 was less than $1 million.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The critical accounting estimates that affect our financial statements and that use judgments and assumptions are listed below. These estimates are subject to a range of amounts because of inherent imprecision that may result from applying judgment to the estimation process. The expenses and accrued liabilities or allowances related to certain of these policies are initially based on our best estimate at the time of original entry in our accounting records. Adjustments are recorded when actual results differ from the expected forecasts underlying the estimates. These adjustments could be material if our results were to change significantly in a short period of time. We make frequent comparisons of actual results and expected forecasts in order to mitigate the likelihood of material adjustments.

Asset impairment.We perform impairment analyses, which are based on the guidance found in ASC Topic 350,“Intangibles -Goodwill and Other” and ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.” Management also evaluates the carrying amount of our inventories on a recurring basis for impairment due to lower of cost or market issues, and for excess or obsolete quantities. Goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives are tested for impairment as of December 31 of each year or more frequently as necessary. The factors that would cause a more frequent test for impairment include, among other things, a significant negative change in the estimated future cash flows of the reporting unit that has goodwill or other intangibles because of an event or a combination of events. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, or external appraisals, as applicable. We review long-lived assets for impairment at the individual asset or the asset group level for which the lowest level of independent cash flows can be identified.

The Company determined that the net carrying value of the Brake North America and Asia group would not be recoverable through the sales process. As a result, an impairment charge of $86 million was recorded within discontinued operations in 2012 to reduce the carrying value of the business to expected realizable value. The impairment was determined by comparing the carrying value of the Brake North America and Asia group to its fair value less costs to sell.

Goodwill. The impairment test involves an optional qualitative assessment before a two-step testing process. First,If we determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would not be required. If we elected to or if we determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, then we perform step 1 of the impairment test process which is a comparison of the fair value of the applicable reporting unit with the aggregate carrying values, including goodwill, is performed.goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step includes comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. The continuing operations goodwill relates to the Filtration segment. The reporting unit’s current fair value is substantially in excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value.value as of December 31, 2013.

We primarily determine the fair value of our reporting units using a discounted cash flow model (“DCF model”), and supplement this with observable valuation multiples for comparable companies, as applicable. The completion of the DCF model requires that we make a number of significant assumptions to produce an estimate of future cash flows. These assumptions include projections of future revenue, costs and working capital changes. In addition, we make assumptions about the estimated cost of capital and other relevant variables, as required, in estimating the fair value of our reporting units. The projections that we use in our DCF model are updated annually and will change over time based on the historical performance and changing business conditions for each of ourthe reporting units.unit. The determination of whether goodwill is impaired involves a significant level of judgment in these assumptions, and changes in our business strategy, or economic or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments. We will continue to monitor market conditions and other factors to determine if interim impairment tests are necessary in future periods. If impairment indicators are present in future periods, the resulting impairment charges could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Trade names. The fair value for each trade name is estimated based upon management’s estimates using a royalty savings approach, which is based on the principle that, if the business did not own the asset, it would have to license it in order to earn the returns that it was earning. The fair value is calculated based on the present value of the royalty stream that the business was saving by owning the asset. The projections that we use in our model are updated annually and will change over time based on the historical performance and changing business conditions for each of our reporting units. The determination of whether trade names are impaired involves a significant level of judgment in these assumptions, and changes in our business strategy, or economic or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments.

Other intangibles. Finite-lived intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Impairment tests for these intangible assets are only performed when a triggering event occurs that indicates that the carrying value of the intangible may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the intangible. If the carrying amount of the intangible is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded. Fair values are determined based on a DCF model.

Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the FIFOfirst in first out (“FIFO”) basis for all inventories or average cost basis for non-U.S. inventories. Where appropriate, standard cost systems are utilized for purposes of determining cost; the standards are adjusted as necessary to ensure they approximate actual costs. Estimates of inventory value are determined on a product line basis. These estimates are based upon current economic conditions, historical sales quantities and patterns and, in some cases, the specific risk of loss on specifically identified inventories.

We also evaluate inventories on a regular basis to identify inventory on hand that may be obsolete or in excess of current and future projected market demand principally based on historical market demand. For inventory deemed to be obsolete, we provide a reserve on the full value of the inventory. Inventory that is in excess of current and projected use, which is generally defined as inventory quantities in excess of 24 months of historical sales, is adjusted for certain allowances such as new part number introductions and product repacking opportunities.

Revenue recognition. Sales are recognized when products are shipped or received depending on terms and whether risk of loss has transferred to the customer. The Company estimates and records provisions for warranty costs, sales returns and other allowances based on experience when sales are recognized. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty and sales returns and allowances liabilities on a regular basis and adjusts the recorded amounts as necessary. While management believes that these estimates are reasonable, actual returns and allowances and warranty costs may differ from estimates. Inter-company sales have been eliminated.

Sales returns and rebates. The amount of sales returns accrued at the time of sale is estimated on the basis of the history of the customer and the history of products returned. Other factors considered in establishing the accrual include consideration of current economic conditions and changes in trends in returns, as well as adjusting for the impact of extraordinary returns that may result from individual negotiations with a customer in an unusual situation. The level of sales returns are recorded as a reduction of gross sales in our financial statements at the time of sale. In addition, we periodically perform studies to determine a scrap factor to be applied to the returns on a product-by-product basis, since a portion of the goods historically returned by customers have not been in saleable condition. Estimates of returned goods that are not in saleable condition are included in cost of sales.

We customize rebate programs with individual customers. Under certain rebate programs, a customer may earn a rebate that will increase as a percentage of the sale amount based on the achievement of specified sales levels. In order to estimate the amount of a rebate under this type of arrangement, we project the amount of sales that the customer will make over the specified rebate period in order to calculate an overall rebate to be accrued at the time that each sale is made. Gross sales are reduced at the time of sale. These estimates may need to be adjusted based on actual customer purchases compared to the projected purchases. Adjustments to the accrual are made as new information becomes available. In other cases a customer may earn a specific rebate for a specific period of time, based upon the sales of certain product types within the specified timeframe. Rebates are recorded as a reduction of gross sales.

Warranty. Estimated costs related to product warranty are accrued at the time of sale and included in cost of sales. Estimated costs are based upon past warranty claims and sales history. In certain situations the estimated cost of the warranty includes a salvage factor where a portion of the inventory returned proves to be saleable. These costs are then adjusted, as required, to reflect subsequent experience.

Pensions. We have defined benefit plans related to Canadian employees with fair value of assets of approximately $2 million and liabilities of approximately $3 million as of December 31, 2010.

Under the defined benefit plans, annual net periodic expense and benefit liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis. Each year, actual experience is compared to the more significant assumptions used and, if warranted, we make adjustments to the assumptions. Discount rates are based upon an expected benefit payments duration analysis and the equivalent average yield rate for high-quality fixed-income investments. Pension benefits are funded through deposits with trustees and the expected long-term rates of return on fund assets are based upon actual historical returns modified for known changes in the market and any expected changes in investment policy.

Income taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years and for carryforwards. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. All available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered when determining the need for a valuation allowance. Judgment is used in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence. The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. Accounting for income taxes involves matters that require estimates and the application of judgment. Our income tax estimates are adjusted in light of changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits and our evaluation of the realizability of our tax assets.

Contingency reserves.We have historically been subject to a number of loss exposures, such as environmental claims, product liability and litigation. Establishing loss reserves for these matters requires the use of estimates and judgment with regard to risk exposure and ultimate liability. We expect to estimate losses relating to such contingent liabilities using consistent and appropriate methods. Changes to assumptions we use could materially affect the recorded liabilities.

Restructuring.The company defines restructuring charges to include costs related to business operation consolidation and exit and disposal activities. In 2005, we announced two restructuring plans: (i) a restructuring plan that we announced at the beginning of 2005 as part of the Acquisition, also referred to as the acquisition restructuring and (ii) a restructuring plan that we announced at the end of 2005, also referred to as the comprehensive restructuring. We have completed the acquisition restructuring and we have essentially completed the comprehensive restructuring. We currently estimate that we will incur in the aggregate approximately $171 million of cash and non cash restructuring costs for the comprehensive restructuring. With the comprehensive restructuring coming to a close we anticipate from time to time further refinement to the Company through continued restructuring. Establishing a reserve requires the estimate and judgment of management with respect to employee termination benefits, environmental costs and other exit costs. We had a $7$1 million and $4$5 million reserve recorded as of December  31, 20092012 and 2010,2013, respectively.

RecentNew Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010,February 2013, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedASU 2010-6, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value MeasurementsComprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,”.” This updatewhich requires additional disclosure withinan entity to report the roll forwardeffect of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair valuesignificant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy andrespective line items in net income if the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the update requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs usedamount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements aresame reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This guidance is effective for interim and annualreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance2012. The implementation of ASU 2013-02 resulted in financial statement disclosure changes only.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, “Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” ASU 2013-10 allows the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (OIS) to be designated as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes, in addition to interest rates on disclosures indirect Treasury obligations of the first quarter of 2010. There areU.S. government and the London Interbank Offered Rate. The amendments also additional new disclosure requirementsremove the restriction on using different benchmark rates for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 measurements, whichsimilar hedges. The amendments are effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginningqualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after December 15, 2010.July 17, 2013. The adoptionCompany does not anticipate the requirements of ASU 2010-6 did not2013-10 will have a material impact on the Company’sconsolidated financial statements because it currently has not entered into any new or redesignated hedging relationships that meet these requirements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 clarifies guidance and eliminates diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and subsequent interim periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010,March 2013, the FASB amended ASC 310,issued ASU No. 2013-05,ReceivablesForeign Currency Matters (Topic 830) — Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity,.with ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): DisclosuresNo. 2013-05 resolves the diversity in practice about whether Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation— Overall, or Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements, applies to the Credit Qualityrelease of Financing Receivables and the Allowancecumulative

translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity. This ASU is effective prospectively for Credit Losses,” to require additional information related to financing receivables, including loans and trade accounts receivable with contractual maturities exceeding one year. With the exception of disclosures related to activity occurring during a reportingfirst annual period which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, the provisions of this update are effective as of December 31, 2010.2013. The Company does not expectis currently assessing the effects of adoption to have a material impact, if any, on ourthe consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.statements.

 

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, such as currency exchange and interest rate fluctuation. Where necessary to minimize such risks we may enter into financial derivative transactions, however we do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Currency risk

We conduct business throughout the world. Although we manage our businesses in such a way as to reduce a portion of the risks associated with operating internationally, changes in currency exchange rates may adversely impact our results of operations and financial position.

The results of operations and financial position of each of our operations are measured in their respective local (functional) currency. Business transactions denominated in currencies other than an operation’s functional currency produce foreign exchange gains and losses, as a result of the re-measurement process, as described in ASC Topic 830,“Foreign Currency Matters.” To the extent that our business activities create monetary assets or liabilities denominated in a non-local currency, changes in an entity’s functional currency exchange rate versus each currency in which an entity transacts business have a varying impact on an entity’s results of operations and financial position, as reported in functional currency terms. Therefore, for entities that transact business in multiple currencies, we seek to minimize the net amount of cash flows and balances denominated in non-local currencies. However, in the normal course of conducting international business, some amount of non-local currency exposure will exist. Therefore, management monitors these exposures and may engage in business activities or execute financial hedge transactions intended to mitigate the potential financial impact duerelated to changes in the respective exchange rates.

Our consolidated results of operations and financial position, as reported in U.S. Dollars, are also affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The results of operations of non-U.S. Dollar functional entities are translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidated reporting purposes each period at the average currency exchange rate experienced during the period. To the extent that the U.S. Dollar may appreciate or depreciate over time, the contribution of non-U.S. Dollar denominated results of operations to our U.S. Dollar reported consolidated earnings will vary accordingly. Therefore, changes in the various local currency exchange rates, as applied to the revenue and expenses of our non-U.S. Dollar operations may have a significant impact on our sales and, to a lesser extent, consolidated net income trends. In addition, a significant portion of our consolidated financial position is maintained at foreign locations and is denominated in functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. The non-U.S. Dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at each respective currency’s exchange rate then in effect at the end of each reporting period. The financial impact of the translation process is reflected within the other comprehensive income component of shareholder’s equity. Accordingly, the amounts shown in our consolidated shareholder’s equity account will fluctuate depending upon the cumulative appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. Dollar versus each of the respective functional currencies in which we conduct business. Management seeks to lessen the potential financial impact upon the our consolidated results of operations due to exchange rate changes by engaging in business activities or by executing financial derivative transactions intended to mitigate specific transactionaltransactions underlying currency exposures. We do not engage in activities solely intended to counteract the impact that changes in currency exchange rates may have upon our U.S. Dollar reported statement of financial condition nor do we engage in currency transactions for speculative purposes.

Our foreign currency exchange rate risk management efforts primarily focus upon operationally managing the net amount of non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. In addition, we routinely execute short-term currency exchange rate forward contracts intended to mitigate the earnings impact related to the re-measurement process. At December 31, 2010,2013, we had currency exchange rate derivatives with an aggregate notional value of $121$86 million and fair values of less than $1 million in assets and less than $1 million in liabilities.

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to the risk of rising interest rates to the extent that we fund operations with short-term or variable-rate borrowings. At December 31, 2010,2013, the Company’s $696$937 million of aggregate debt outstanding consisted of $105$687 million of floating-rate debt and $591$250 million of fixed-rate debt.

Pursuant to our written interest rate risk management policy we actively monitor and manage our fixed versus floating rate debt composition within a specified range. At year-end, fixed rate debt comprised approximately 85%27% of our total debt. Based on the amount of floating-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 20102013 a 1% rise in interest rates would result in approximately $1$7 million in incremental interest expense.

In April 2013, the Company entered into interest rate swaps having an aggregate notional value of $300 million to effectively fix the rate of interest on a portion of our variable rate Term Loan B-2 until April 2020. We have designated our interest rate swaps as “cash flow” hedges as described in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). Each of these transactions contains an embedded benchmark-rate floor of 1.25% which mirrors the terms contained in the Term Loan B-2. Based on the amount of floating-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2013, the interest rate swaps would reduce the incremental interest expense from a 1% rise in interest rates from $7 million to $4 million. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate fair value of the interest rate swap was an asset of $11 million.

Commodity Price Risk Management

We are exposed to adverse price movements or surcharges related to commodities that are used in the normal course of business operations. Management actively seeks to negotiate contractual terms with our customers and suppliers to limit the potential financial impact related to these exposures.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Ann Arbor, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholder’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010,2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan

March 31, 2014

Detroit, Michigan

March 11, 2011

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December  31,
2008
 Year Ended
December  31,
2009
 Year Ended
December  31,
2010
   Year Ended
December 31,
2011
 Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Net sales

  $1,915   $1,797   $1,991    $1,266   $1,259   $1,361  

Cost of sales

   (1,546  (1,429  (1,581   (979 (967 (1,043
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   369    368    410     287    292    318  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (276  (267  (290   (175  (172  (200
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating profit

   93    101    120     112    120    118  

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

   —      8    (1

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —     (1  (15

Other income (loss), net

   (3  5    3     4    3    (1

Interest expense

   (56  (69  (66   (67  (63  (73
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   34    45    56  

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   49    59    29  

Income tax provision

   (18  (22  (27   (28  (45  (22

Equity in income, net of tax

   —      1    1  

Equity in income (loss), net of tax

   —      1    (2
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   16    24    30     21    15    5  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (19  (61  —    

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (93  (117  5  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

   (3  (37  30     (72  (102  10  

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      7    6     1    1    —    
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(3 $(44 $24    $(73 $(103 $10  
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

(Dollars in millions)  December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2010
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $65   $55  

Restricted cash

   9    12  

Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $3 million for 2009 and $2 million for 2010

   293    316  

Inventories, net

   430    520  

Current deferred taxes

   50    40  

Prepaid taxes

   50    55  

Other current assets

   21    18  

Current assets of discontinued operations

   55    —    
         

Total current assets

   973    1,016  

Property, plant, and equipment, net

   199    217  

Goodwill

   43    59  

Other intangible assets, net

   149    156  

Deferred financing costs

   24    23  

Deferred income taxes

   68    85  

Investments and other assets

   27    33  
         

Total assets

  $1,483   $1,589  
         

Liabilities and shareholder’s equity

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $201   $244  

Notes payable

   12    27  

Other accrued expenses

   154    151  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   27    33  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   43    —    
         

Total current liabilities

   437    455  

Long-term debt

   589    669  

Deferred employee benefits and other noncurrent liabilities

   20    17  
         

Total liabilities

   1,046    1,141  
         

Contingencies and commitments

   

Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding

   —      —    

Additional paid-in capital

   434    454  

Accumulated deficit

   (81  (57

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   38    39  
         

Total shareholder’s equity of the Company

   391    436  

Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

   46    12  
         

Total shareholder’s equity

   437    448  
         

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity

  $1,483   $1,589  
         
(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Net income (loss)

  $(72 $(102 $10  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

    

Pension liability adjustment

   (1  —      1  

Change in foreign currency translation adjustments(1)

   (32  (15  (19

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps(2)

   —      —      9  

Reclassification adjustments included in net income

   —      —      (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (33  (15  (11
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   (105  (117  (1

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   1    1    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to the Company

  $(106 $(118 $(1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Net of $3 million tax expense in 2013, $4 million tax expense in 2012 and $1 million tax expense in 2011.
(2)Net of $4 million tax expense in 2013.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s EquityBalance Sheets

 

(Dollars in millions)

  Common
stock
   Additional
paid-in
capital
  Accumu-
lated
deficit
  Pension
adjustments
  Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment
  Interest
rate
swap
  Accum-
ulated other
Comprehen-
sive income
(loss)
  Total
share-
holder’s
equity of
the
company
  Noncon-
trolling
Interest
  Total
equity
 

Balance at December 31, 2007

  $—      $408   $(34 $(3 $63   $ (2)   $432   $2    434  

Stock-based compensation

   —       —      —      —      —      —       —      —      —    

Capital contribution

   —       3    —      —      —      —       3    —      3  

Noncontrolling interest related to acquisitions

   —       —      —      —      —      —       —      58    58  

Net loss

   —       —      (3  —      —      —      (3  (3  —      (3

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Interest rate swap – net of tax of $1 million

   —       —      —      —      —      (2  (2  (2  —      (2

Minimum pension liability adjustment

   —       —      —      (1  —      —      (1  (1  —      (1

Currency translation – net of tax of $1 million

   —       —      —      —      (73  —      (73  (73  —      (73
               

Comprehensive loss

   —       —      —      —      —      —      (79   
                                          

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $—      $411   $(37 $(4 $(10 $(4  $356    60    416  
                                       

Stock-based compensation

   —       1    —      —      —      —       1    —      1  

Capital contribution

   —       25    —      —      —      —       25    —      25  

Noncontrolling interest decrease due to acquisition of additional ownership

   —       (3  —      —      —      —       (3  (21  (24

Net (loss) income

   —       —      (44  —      —      —      (44  (44  7    (37

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Interest rate swap – net of tax of $2

   —       —      —      —      —      4    4    4    —      4  

Minimum pension liability adjustment

   —       —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Currency translation – net of tax of $2 million

   —       —      —      —      52    —      52    52    —      52  
               

Comprehensive income

   —       —      —      —      —      —      12     
                                          

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $—      $434   $(81 $(4 $42   $—      $391    46    437  
                                       

Stock-based compensation

   —       1    —      —      —      —       1    —      1  

Capital contribution

   —       3    —      —      —      —       3    —      3  

Noncontrolling interest decrease due to acquisition of additional ownership

   —       16    —      —      —      —       16    (40  (24

Net income

   —       —      24    —      —      —      24    24    6    30  

Other comprehensive income:

            

Loss on settlement pension obligations

   —       —      —      3    —      —      3    3    —      3  

Currency translation – net of tax of less than $1 million

   —       —      —      —      (2  —      (2  (2  —      (2
               

Comprehensive income

   —       —      —      —      —      —      25     
                                          

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $—      $454   $(57 $(1 $40   $—      $436   $12   $448  
                                       
(Dollars in millions)  December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2013
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $51   $101  

Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $3 million for 2012 and $2 million for 2013

   163    141  

Inventories, net

   304    221  

Current deferred taxes

   13    39  

Prepaid taxes

   30    29  

Other current assets

   22    32  

Current assets of discontinued operations

   —      141  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   583    704  

Property, plant, and equipment, net

   119    123  

Goodwill

   24    3  

Other intangible assets, net

   88    60  

Deferred financing costs

   15    18  

Deferred income taxes

   106    80  

Investments and other assets

   25    21  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $960   $1,009  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and shareholder’s equity (deficit)

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $143   $121  

Notes payable

   23    23  

Current maturities of long-term debt

   —      7  

Other accrued expenses

   68    78  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   17    19  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   —      31  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   251    279  

Long-term debt, net of current maturities

   546    907  

Deferred employee benefits and other noncurrent liabilities

   12    24  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   809    1,210  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Contingencies and commitments

   

Shareholder’s equity (deficit):

   

Common stock, $.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding

   —      —    

Additional paid-in capital

   455    456  

Accumulated deficit

   (296  (638

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (9  (20
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholder’s equity (deficit) of the Company

   150    (202

Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

   1    1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholder’s equity (deficit)

   151    (201
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity (deficit)

  $960   $1,009  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsShareholder’s Equity (Deficit)

 

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December  31,
2008
  Year Ended
December  31,
2009
  Year Ended
December  31,
2010
 

Operating activities

    

Net income (loss)

  $(3 $(37 $30  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   36    38    37  

Impairment of assets

   2    75    —    

Stock-based compensation

   1    1    1  

Loss on disposition of affiliate

   1    —      —    

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

   —      (8  1 

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   —      5    1 

Provision for deferred income taxes

   14    (9  (16

Change in trade accounts receivable

   31    3    (14

Change in inventories

   (39  42    (77

Change in other current operating assets

   (49  (33  12  

Change in other current operating liabilities

   57    (42  39  

Change in other

   (3  20    9  
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   48    55    23  

Investing activities

    

Proceeds from sales of assets

   1    —      1  

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   (50  —      (51

Proceeds from sale of affiliates

   6    —      11  

Investments in affiliates

   (6  —      —    

Change in restricted cash

   (1  (5  (3

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   (25  (31  (52

Other investing activities

   —      —      (4
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (75  (36  (98

Financing activities

    

Net increase in other short-term debt

   —      —      13  

Proceeds from other debt

   —      —      2  

Proceeds from Subordinated Notes

   —      —      100  

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —      —      (23

Payments on senior term loan facility

   —      (297  —    

Proceeds from senior term loan facility

   1    —      —    

Capital contribution

   50    —      3  

Net decrease in debt of noncontrolling interest

   —      (3  —    

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —      (22  (5

Proceeds from Secured Notes

   —      222    —    

Net proceeds from ABL Revolver

   —      90    —    

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —      (25  (24
             

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   51    (35  66  

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   (6  4    (1

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   18    (12  (10

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

   59    77    65  
             

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

  $77   $65   $55  
             

Supplemental cash flows information

    

Cash paid during the period for:

    

Interest

  $52   $53   $60  

Income taxes

  $22   $14   $30  

(Dollars in millions)

 Common
stock
  Additional
paid-in
capital
  Accumulated
deficit
  Other
comprehensive
income
  Total
shareholder’s
equity
(deficit) of
the
Company
  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total
equity
(deficit)
 

Balance at January 1, 2011

 $—     $454   $(57 $39   $436   $12   $448  

Stock-based compensation

  —      2    —      —      2    —      2  

Capital contribution

  —      2    —      —      2    —      2  

Net income (loss)

  —      —      (73  —      (73  1    (72

Pension liability adjustment

  —      —      —      (1  (1  —      (1

Currency translation – net of tax

  —      —      —      (32  (32  —      (32
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

 $—     $458   $(130 $6   $334   $13   $347  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

  —      1    —      —      1    —      1  

Noncontrolling interest decrease due to acquisition of additional ownership

  —      (4  —      —      (4  —      (4

Noncontrolling interest decrease due to distribution of BPI

  —      —      —      —      —      (13  (13

Distribution of BPI

  —      —      (63  —      (63  —      (63

Net income (loss)

  —      —      (103  —      (103  1    (102

Pension liability adjustment

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Currency translation – net of tax

  —      —      —      (15  (15  —      (15
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 $—     $455   $(296 $(9 $150   $1   $151  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

  —      1    —      —      1    —      1  

Net income (loss)

  —      —      10    —      10    —      10  

Dividends

  —      —      (352  —      (352  —      (352

Pension liability adjustment

  —      —      —      1   1    —      1  

Change in market value of interest rate swaps

  —      —      —      7   7    —      7  

Currency translation – net of tax

  —      —      —      (19  (19  —      (19
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 $—     $456   $(638 $(20 $(202 $1   $(201
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Operating activities

    

Net income (loss)

  $(72 $(102 $10  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   39    24    22  

Impairment of assets in discontinued operations

   166    86    —    

Stock-based compensation

   2    —      1 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —      1    15  

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   —      —      8  

Write-off of original issue discount on Subordinated notes

   —      —      1  

Provision for deferred income taxes

   (32  —      26  

Change in trade accounts receivable

   14    23    6  

Change in inventories

   8    (22  (3

Change in other current operating assets

   (58  39    (43

Change in other current operating liabilities

   (47  38    24  

Change in other

   (6  10    32  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   14    97    99  

Investing activities

    

Proceeds from sales of assets

   9    4    —    

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   (1  —      (1)

Change in restricted cash

   5    —      —    

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   (55  (27  (31

Other investing activities

   3    —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (39  (23  (32

Financing activities

    

Net decrease in other short-term debt

   (6  (4  —    

Payments of other debt

   (10  (2  —    

Proceeds from other debt

   20    —      —    

Net proceeds from (payments of) ABL Revolver

   20    (110  —    

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —      (23  (195

Repayment on Subordinated Notes

   —      —      (367

Dividend to Shareholder

   —      —      (352

Repayment of Term Loans

   —      —      (3

Capital contribution

   2    —      —    

Proceeds from BPI’s new credit facility

   —      76    —    

Cash related to the deconsolidation of BPI

   —      (11  —    

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —      (1  (15

Proceeds from Term Loans

   —      —      667 

Proceeds from Senior Notes

   —      —      250 

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —      (3  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   26    (78  (15

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   (2  1    (2

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (1  (3  50  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

   55    54    51  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

  $54   $51   $101  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flows information

    

Cash paid during the period for:

    

Interest

  $63   $59   $64  

Income taxes

  $27   $21   $20  

Noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Additions to property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable

  $2   $1   $—    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Organization and Description of Business

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. is a global leader in the light and commercial vehicle replacement products and services industry. We derive approximately 98%97% of our sales from this industry and, as a result, are not directly affected by the market cyclicality of the automotive original equipment manufacturers.industry. Our broad range of brake, filtration, chassis and other products are sold in North America, Europe, South America and Asia. Our brands include WIX®, Raybestos®, FiltronTM, Nakata®, Brake-ProMcQuay-Norris®, FiltronTM AIMCO and ecoLAST® and McQuay-Norris®. Additionally, we provide private label products for NAPA®, CARQUEST® and ACDelco and other customers and co-branded offerings for Federated Auto Parts and Automotive Distribution Network.®. Affinia Group Inc. is wholly-owned by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., which, in turn, is wholly-owned by Affinia Group Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”), a company controlled by affiliates of The Cypress Group L.L.C.L.L.C (“Cypress”).

Affinia Group Inc., the Company’s direct, wholly-owned subsidiary and a Delaware corporation formed on June 28, 2004, entered into a stock and asset purchase agreement on November 30, 2004, as amended (the “Purchase Agreement”), with Dana Corporation (“Dana”). The Purchase Agreement provided for the acquisition by Affinia Group Inc. of substantially all of Dana’s aftermarket business operations (the “Acquisition”).

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. In these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Note 2. AcquisitionSummary of Significant Accounting Policies

On December 16, 2010,Principles of Consolidation

In accordance with ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” the Company, throughconsolidated financial statements include the accounts of Affinia and its subsidiarywholly and majority owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities (“VIE”) for which Affinia Products Corp LLC, acquired substantially all the assets of North American Parts Distributors, Inc. (“NAPD”). NAPD, located in Ramsey, New Jersey, was an automobile parts and supplies wholesaler. The NAPD acquisition expands our product offering of chassis parts to(or one of its subsidiaries) is the broadestprimary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Equity investments in which we exercise significant influence but do not control are accounted for using the industry. NAPD’s purchased assets and assumed liabilities were acquired for cash consideration of $52 million. The initial purchase price was $51 million and was paidequity method. Investments in 2010. Subsequently, in 2011which we are not able to exercise significant influence over the working capital adjustment was settled for $1 million. The working capital adjustment was based on the difference between targeted working capital and working capital at the closing date. This acquisition was considered immaterial for disclosure of supplemental pro forma information and revenues and earnings of the acquiree since the acquisition date. We financed this acquisition with the available borrowings under our ABL Revolver, which borrowings were repaid with our completed offering on December 9, 2010 of the Additional Notes.

The aforementioned acquisition has beeninvestee are accounted for under the purchasecost method.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of the more significant estimates include valuation of deferred tax assets and inventories; workers compensation; sales return, rebate and warranty accruals; restructuring, environmental and product liability accruals; valuation of postemployment and postretirement benefits and allowances for doubtful accounts. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The primary type of financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are trade accounts receivable. The Company limits its credit risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and, when deemed necessary, requires letters of credit, guarantees or collateral. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from replacement parts wholesalers and retailers serving the aftermarket.

The Company’s net sales to its two largest customers as a percentage of total net sales from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013, were 22%, and 6%; for the year ended December 31, 2012, were 23% and 6%; and for the year ended December 31, 2011, were 22% and 5%. Net sales represent the amounts invoiced to customers after adjustments related to rebates, returns and discounts. The Company provides reserves for rebates, returns and discounts at the time of sale which are subsequently applied to the account of specific customers based upon actual activity including the attainment of targeted volumes. The Company’s two largest customers’ accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013 represented approximately 11% and 5% of the total accounts receivable, which includes continuing operations. The Company’s two largest customers’ accounts receivable, which includes continuing and discontinued operations, as of December 31, 2012 represented approximately 23% and 5% of the total accounts receivable. The discontinued operations were the main contributing factor to the decrease in accounts receivable concentration as of December 31, 2013 in comparison to December 31, 2012.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are charged or credited to Other Comprehensive Income.

Included in net income (loss) are the gains and losses arising from foreign currency transactions. The impact on income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest of foreign currency transactions including the results of our foreign currency hedging activities amounted to a loss of $1 million, gain of $2 million and loss of $6 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts receivable

We record trade accounts receivable when revenue is recorded in accordance with our revenue recognition policy and relieve accounts receivable when payments are received from customers. Generally, we do not require collateral for our accounts receivable.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is established through charges to the provision for bad debts. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts on a periodic basis. The evaluation includes historical trends in collections and write-offs, management’s judgment of the probability of collecting accounts, and management’s evaluation of business risk. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to revision as more information becomes available. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $3 million and $2 million at December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the FIFO basis for all domestic inventories or average cost basis for non-U.S. inventories.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized, but instead the Company evaluates goodwill for impairment, as of December 31 of each year, unless conditions arise that would require a more frequent evaluation. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we perform a qualitative or quantitative assessment to test for impairment annually. If we determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that a quantitative impairment test is required estimated future cash flows and other factors are made to determine the fair value of the respective reporting unit. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for goodwill at that time.

Intangibles

We have trade names with indefinite lives and other intangibles with definite lives. We test trade names for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31 of each year, unless conditions arise that would require a more frequent evaluation. Trade names are tested for impairment by comparing the fair value to their carrying values.

Our intangibles with definite lives consist of customer relationships, patents and developed technology. These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 20 years. Certain conditions may arise that could result in a change in useful lives or require us to perform a valuation to determine if the definite lived intangibles are impaired.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt. The amortization of deferred financing costs is classified in interest expense in the statement of operations.

Properties and Depreciation

Fixed assets are being depreciated over their estimated remaining lives using primarily the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and accelerated depreciation methods for federal income tax purposes. Major additions and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, and repairs and maintenance are charged to expense in the period incurred. We review long-lived assets for impairment and generally accepted accounting principles require recognition of an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. If the long-lived asset is not recoverable, we measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset.

Useful lives for buildings and building improvements, machinery and equipment, tooling and office equipment, furniture and fixtures principally range from 20 to 30 years, five to ten years, three to five years and three to ten years, respectively. Upon retirement or other disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds is recorded as a gain or loss on disposition.

Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when products are shipped or received, depending on the contractual terms, and risk of loss has transferred to the customer. The Company estimates and records provisions for warranty costs, sales returns, rebates and other allowances based on experience and other relevant factors, when sales are recognized. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty, sales returns, rebates and allowances liabilities on a regular basis and adjusts the recorded amounts as necessary. While management believes that these estimates are reasonable, actual warranty costs, actual returns, rebates and allowances may differ from estimates. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in sales and the costs of shipping and handling are included in cost of sales. Inter-company sales have been eliminated.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are recognized during the period in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income, with deferred income taxes being provided for the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred income taxes are provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and affiliated companies except to the extent such earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested in the subsidiary or affiliate. In cases where foreign tax credits will not offset U.S. income taxes, appropriate provisions are included in the combined or consolidated statement of operations.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 805,740,Business Combinations.Income Taxes.We engaged independent appraisersAccordingly, the Company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to assistbe taken in determining thea tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Financial Instruments

The reported fair values of inventory and intangible assets acquired; including non-competition agreements, developed technology and customer relationships. Purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment until all pertinent information regarding the acquisition is obtained and fully evaluated. Based on our preliminary valuations and purchase accounting adjustments, we recorded $22 million as goodwill at the endfinancial instruments, consisting of 2010. The Company, however, has not completely finalized the allocation of the purchase price as of December 31, 2010. We have made a preliminary allocation of the purchase price on the basis of its current estimate of the fair value of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We expect the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes. During 2011, we may make further adjustments to these preliminary allocations.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the Acquisition:

(Dollars in millions)  Preliminary
Allocation
 

Inventory

  $10  

Trade accounts receivable

   7  

Customer relationships

   8  

Non-competition agreement

   1  

Unpatented technology (i.e, tooling)

   5  

Goodwill

   22  
     

Total acquired assets

  $53  
     

Current liabilities

   1  
     

Net assets acquired

  $52  
     

Cashcash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and long-term debt, are based on a variety of factors. Where available, fair values represent quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on assumptions concerning the implied market volatilities, amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates reflecting varying degrees of credit and market risk. Fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could be realized as of the balance sheet date or that will be realized in the future. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the book value of some of our financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts payable,receivable, approximated their fair values. The fair value of long-term debt is disclosed in “Note 9. Debt.”

Environmental Compliance and Remediation

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Estimated costs are based upon current laws and regulations, existing technology and the most probable method of remediation. The costs are not discounted and exclude the effects of inflation. If the cost estimates result in a range of equally probable amounts, the lower end of the range is accrued.

Advertising Costs

Advertising expenses included in continuing operations were $23 million, $20 million and $19 million for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. The advertising expenses included in discontinued operations, were $10 million, $7 million and $2 million for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. Advertising costs are recognized as selling expenses at the time advertising is incurred.

Promotional Programs

Cooperative advertising programs conducted with customers that promote the Company’s products are accrued expensesas a rebate based on anticipated total amounts to be rebated to customers over the period of the agreement with the customer. Aftermarket distributors typically source their product lines at a particular price point and product category with one “full-line” supplier, such as our company, which covers substantially all of their product requirements. Switching to a new supplier typically requires that a distributor or supplier make a substantial investment to purchase, or “changeover” to, the new supplier’s products. The changeover costs and other current liabilities wereincentives incurred in connection with obtaining new business are recognized as selling expense in the period in which the changeover from a competitor’s product to the Company’s product occurs. Infrequently, we enter into a contract with a customer for a set period of time that requires the reimbursement of the incentive by the customer if the future conditions of the contract are not met. In these infrequent cases the incentive is recorded atas a reduction of revenue over the life of the contract.

Insurance

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks, including workers’ compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and the Company-funded portion of employee-related health care benefits. Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical carrying values, givenclaims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development expenses included in continuing operations are charged to operations as incurred. The Company incurred less than $1 million for the short-term natureyears ended 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Free-Standing Derivatives

The Company is subject to various financial risks during the normal course of business operations, including but not limited to, adverse changes to interest rates, currency exchange rates, counterparty creditworthiness, and commodity prices. Pursuant to prudent risk management principles, the Company may utilize appropriate financial derivative instruments in order to mitigate the potential impact of these assetsfactors. The Company’s policies strictly prohibit the use of derivatives for speculative purposes.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, from time to time, to manage the risk that changes in interest rates will have on the amount of future interest payments. Interest rate swap contracts are used to adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable versus fixed interest rates. Under these agreements, the Company agrees to pay an amount equal to a specified fixed rate times a notional principal amount, and liabilities. Customer relationships with estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 20 years have been valued usingreceive an income approach, which utilizedamount equal to a discounted cash flow method.specified variable rate times the same notional principal amount or vice versa. The unpatented technology with an estimated useful life of 10 years was valued utilizing a relief from royalty method. The non-competition agreement with an estimated useful life of 5 years was valued utilizing a formnotional amounts of the discountedcontract are not exchanged. No other cash flowpayments are made unless the contract is terminated prior to maturity, in which case the amount paid or received in settlement is established by agreement at the time of termination and will represent the net present value, at current rates of interest, of the remaining obligation to exchange payments under the terms of the contract. The Company measures hedge effectiveness, at least quarterly, by using the hypothetical derivative method.

In 2012 and 2013, the Company’s derivative instrument usage was standard currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps. The currency forward contracts are intended to offset the earnings impact related to the periodic revaluation of specific non-functional currency denominated monetary working capital accounts and intercompany financing arrangements. The Company does not seek hedge accounting treatment for its currency forward contacts because the earnings impact from both the underlying exposures and the hedge transactions are recognized in each accounting period. The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage the ratio of net floating-rate debt to total debt outstanding, thereby reducing the potential impact that interest rate variability may have on our consolidated financial results. We have designated our interest rate swaps as “cash flow” hedges as described in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”).

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for the employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes model to determinemeasure stock-based compensation expense at the date of grant. The compensation expense for the year was nil in each of 2011, 2012 and 2013.

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the 2005 Stock Plan. The 2005 Stock Plan was amended on August 25, 2010 and on December 2, 2010 to increase the maximum shares of common stock that may be subject to awards. The 2005 Stock Plan permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants of the Company and its affiliates. A maximum of 350,000 shares of common stock may be subject to awards under the 2005 Stock Plan. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2005 Stock Plan (or pursuant to outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment on account of mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock dividends and other dilutive changes in the common stock. Shares of common stock covered by awards that terminate or lapse and shares delivered by a participant or withheld to pay the minimum statutory withholding rate, in each case, will again be available for grant under the 2005 Stock Plan. Refer to “Note 11. Stock Incentive Plan” for further information on and discussion of our stock options.

On August 25, 2010 and December 23, 2011, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. commenced an offer to certain eligible holders of stock options to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock for restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”). The RSUs granted in connection with the option exchange are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and a new Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. The RSUs are subject to performance-based and market-based vesting restrictions, which differ from the performance and time-based vesting restrictions applicable to the exchanged stock options. We will estimate the fair value of restricted stock unit awards using the value of lost income.Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock prior to vesting. The fair value of the RSUs will be expensed either pro rata over the requisite service term or in full if the requisite service period has passed when the RSUs vest in accordance with the performance conditions listed above. Stock-based compensation expense, which would be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits was not recorded for 2011, 2012 or 2013 as the performance condition had not been met. In addition, during 2013, 14,124 new RSUs were granted to a new employee. The new employee received 7,062 RSUs based on the same performance conditions as the previously issued RSUs. The employee also received 7,062 time-based RSUs which will vest in four equal annual installments from the anniversary date of the employee’s commencement of employment, which was in 2013.

Note 3. Joint Venture AcquisitionDeferred Compensation Plan

In December 2010, we acquiredWe started a deferred compensation plan in 2008 that permits executives to defer receipt of all or a portion of the remaining 50% ownership interestamounts payable under our non-equity incentive compensation plan. All amounts deferred are treated solely for purposes of the plan to have been notionally invested in the common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. As such, the accounts under the plan will reflect investment gains and losses associated with an investment in Affinia India Private Limited,Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. We match 25% of the Company’s India joint venture, for $24 milliondeferral with an additional notional investment in cash, increasing our ownership interest from 50% to 100%. The acquisitioncommon stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc., which is not subject to vesting as provided in the plan.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,”which requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The implementation of ASU 2013-02 resulted in financial statement disclosure changes only.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, “Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” ASU 2013-10 allows the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (OIS) to be designated as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes, in addition to interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government and the London Interbank Offered Rate. The amendments also remove the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The amendments are effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The Company does not anticipate the requirements of ASU 2013-10 will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements because it currently has not entered into any post closing purchase price adjustmentsnew or earn-outs. We hadredesignated hedging relationships that meet these requirements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 clarifies guidance and eliminates diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and subsequent interim periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) — Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.” ASU No. 2013-05 resolves the diversity in practice about whether Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, or Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements, applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity. This ASU is effective prospectively for the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Discontinued Operation—Chassis

On January 21, 2014, Affinia India Private Limited priorGroup Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with VCS Quest Acquisition LLC (“VCS”), an affiliate of Federal-Mogul Corporation, pursuant to which VCS agreed to purchase the Chassis group. The closing of the transaction is subject to the purchasereceipt of the remaining 50% interest. Since we had control prior to the purchase, the transaction has been accounted for as an equity transaction consistentregulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. In accordance with ASC Topic 810, 205,ConsolidationPresentation of Financial Statements,”.” As the Chassis group qualified as a result of the transaction the noncontrolling interest balance was decreased by $8 million and the additional paid-in capital was decreased by $16 million. We financed this acquisition with the available borrowings under our ABL Revolver, which borrowings were repaid with the use of proceeds from our completed offering on December 9, 2010 of the Additional Notes.

Note 4. Discontinued Operation

In the fourth quarter of 2009discontinued operation as we committed to a plan to sell the Commercial Distribution Europe segment.Chassis group in the fourth quarter of 2013. The consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect this group as a discontinued operation. The consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented were not adjusted to reflect this group as a discontinued operation.

In connection with the transaction, Affinia will receive $150 million in cash from VCS plus or minus an adjustment reflecting an estimate of the working capital of the Chassis group, calculated in accordance with a process established in the Agreement. The Chassis group held $1 million in cash that will be excluded from the transaction. On the date of the transaction, we will no longer have any influence over the Chassis group. Consequently, we will deconsolidate the Chassis group on the date of the transaction.

The table below summarizes the Chassis group’s net sales, income before income tax provision, income tax provision and income attributable to the discontinued operations.

(Dollars in millions)  2011  2012  2013 

Net sales

  $213   $194   $189  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income tax provision

   29    10    15  

Income tax provision

   (9  (3  (10
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

  $20   $7   $5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The amounts for 2012 related to the Chassis group are not reclassified to current assets of discontinued operations and current liabilities of discontinued operations on the balance sheet. The following table shows the Chassis group assets and liabilities that are included in held for sale as of December 31, 2013:

(Dollars in millions)    

Cash

  $1  

Accounts receivable

   9  

Inventory

   74  

Other current assets

   4  

Property, plant and equipment

   8  

Goodwill

   22  

Other intangible assets

   22  

Other assets

   1  
  

 

 

 

Total assets of discontinued operations

  $141  
  

 

 

 

Accounts payable

  $18  

Other accrued expenses

   12  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   1  
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities of discontinued operations

  $31  
  

 

 

 

Note 4. Discontinued Operation—Brake

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we committed to a plan to sell the Brake North America and Asia group. In accordance with ASC Topic 360,205,Property, Plant,Presentation of Financial Statements,” the Brake North America and Equipment”, the Commercial Distribution Europe segmentAsia group qualified as a discontinued operation. The consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect this segmentgroup as a discontinued operation. The consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented were not adjusted to reflect this segmentgroup as a discontinued operation.

On November 30, 2012, we distributed our Brake North America and Asia group to the shareholders of Holdings, the Company’s parent company and sole stockholder. The new organization is led by the management team from the Company’s former Brake North America and Asia group, with oversight provided by a separate board of directors. On March 25, 2013, the new organization announced that it had been acquired by a group of investors.

To effect the transaction, we distributed 100% of the capital stock of BPI Holdings International, Inc. (“BPI”), an entity formed for the purpose of completing the transaction and which owns the assets and operations comprising the Company’s former Brake North America and Asia group, to Holdings. Thereafter, Holdings distributed such capital stock to the holders of Holdings common stock and to the holders of Holding’s 9.5% Class A Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”), on apro rata basis as if each of the shares of Preferred Stock outstanding at the time of the distribution had been converted into Holdings common stock in accordance with its terms prior to the distribution. The fair value of the capital stock distributed to the shareholders of Holdings was $63 million. In addition, noncontrolling interest decreased by $13 million due to the distribution of BPI.

In connection with the distribution, the Company received a $70 million cash dividend from BPI, which BPI funded through $76.5 million in borrowings under a new credit facility that is not guaranteed by, or an obligation of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries. BPI held $11 million in cash that was included in the distribution on November 30, 2012.

Affinia and BPI entered into a transition services agreement (“TSA”) effective with the distribution on November 30, 2012. The TSA provides for certain administrative and other services and support to be provided by us to BPI and to be provided by BPI to us. Most of the transition services expired during 2013, but the distribution services will continue in 2014. The TSAs and the distribution services were established as arm length transactions and are intended for the contracting parties to recover costs of the services. On the date of the distribution, we no longer had any influence over BPI. We evaluated all potential variable interests between Affinia and BPI and determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of BPI. Consequently, we deconsolidated BPI on the date of the distribution.

The table below summarizes the Commercial Distribution Europe segment’sBrake North America and Asia group’s net sales, loss before income tax provision, income tax provision, and lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.tax, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax and loss attributable to the discontinued operations.

 

(Dollars in millions)  2008  2009  2010 

Net sales

  $263   $237   $18  

Loss before income tax provision

   (17  (84  —    

Income tax provision

   (2  23    —    
             

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

  $(19 $(61 $—    
             
(Dollars in millions)  2011  2012 

Net sales

  $637   $582  

Loss before income tax benefit (provision)

   (174  (91

Income tax benefit (provision)

   61    (33
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (113  (124

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   1    1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss attributable to the discontinued operations

  $(114 $(125
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

We entered into a Sale andan Asset Purchase Agreement with Klarius Group LimitedCarter Automotive Company Inc. (“KGL”) and Auto Holding Paris S.A.S. (“AHP”) (collectively, the “Purchaser”Carter”) on February 2, 2010 (the “Agreement”),June 28, 2012, pursuant to which KGLCarter purchased certain assets located in our Juarez, Mexico facility, which is included in our Brake North America and Asia group, for $2.5 million. The transaction resulted in an impairment and loss on sale of $6 million on fixed assets and inventory for the sharessecond quarter of Quinton Hazell Automotive Limited and Quinton Hazell Italia SpA and AHP purchased the shares of Quinton Hazell Deutschland GmbH and Affinia Holding S.A.S. (collectively, the “Group Companies”) for $12 million as of2012.

The Company determined at the end of 2009. We settled with KGL on a working capital adjustment in February 2011 and as a result the purchase price was lowered by $1 million effective for 2010. Consequently, the net purchase price after the settlement was $11 million. The Agreement also called for the Purchaser to assume debt of $2.6 million. We also retained the cash in the Group Companies. The business of the Group Companies and their subsidiaries consist of manufacturing and distribution facilities in eight countries in Europe.

In accordance with ASC Topic 360,“Property, Plant, and Equipment, intangibles and other long-lived assets are assessed for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the assets. The Company determined that the net carrying value of the Commercial Distribution Europe segmentBrake North America and Asia group may not be recoverable through the sales process. At the end of 2011, the fair value of the Brake North America and Asia group assets held for sale were determined based on current market data, discounted cash flow model and observable valuation multiples for comparable companies. As a result, an impairment charge of $75$165 million was recorded within discontinued operations in 20092011 to reduce the carrying value of the business to expected realizable value. A tax benefit to the Company of $24$57 million was recorded resulting from this transaction. in 2011 relating to the impairment.

The sale was consummatedcarrying value of the capital stock of BPI exceeded the fair value of the disposal group, which resulted in an additional impairment of $86 million in 2012. The loss on February 2, 2010 and the estimated loss has subsequently decreased $2 million offset by the one month of operating losses of $1 million resulting in net income from discontinued operations before income tax provision for 2012 is $91 million and $1 million loss on post closing adjustments.

The following table shows an analysis of assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2009:

(Dollars in millions)    

Accounts receivable

  $34  

Inventory

   67  

Other current assets

   6  

Property, plant and equipment

   18  

Long-term assets

   5  

Impairment of assets

   (75
     

Total assets of discontinued operations

   55  
     

Current liabilities

   41  

Long-term liabilities

   2  
     

Total liabilities of discontinued operations

  $43  
     

Note 5. Variable Interest Entity

Effective October 31, 2008, Affinia Acquisition LLC completed the purchase of 85%is comprised of the equity interests (the “Acquired Shares”) in HBM Investment Limited (“HBM”). HBM was the sole owner$86 million impairment and an operational loss of Longkou Haimeng Machinery Company Limited (“Haimeng”), a drum and rotor manufacturing company located in Longkou City, China.$5 million. The purchase price was $50 million and included $25 million in current and long term debt on Haimeng’s books. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. received $51 million in return for preferred stock from Cypress, co-investors and management. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. contributed $50 million to Affinia Acquisition LLC to purchase 85% of the equity interests in HBM.

HBM subsequently changed its name to Affinia Hong Kong Limited. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. owned 95% of Affinia Acquisition LLC and Affinia Group Inc. owned the remaining 5% interest. Effective June 1, 2009, Affinia Group Inc. acquired an additional 35% ownership interest in Affinia Acquisition LLC for a purchase price of $25 million, which increased its ownership to 40%. ASC Topic 810 requires the “primary beneficiary” of a variable interest entities (“VIE”) to include the VIE’s assets, liabilities and operating results in its consolidated financial statements. Based on the criteria for consolidation of VIEs, we determined that Affinia Group Inc. was deemed the primary beneficiary of Affinia Acquisition LLC. Therefore, our consolidated financial statements include Affinia Acquisition LLC and its subsidiaries.

On September 1, 2010, our parent company, Affinia Group Holdings Inc., contributed the remaining 60% interest in Affinia Acquisition LLC to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. contributed such interest to Affinia Group Inc. Consequently, the noncontrolling interest balance was decreased by $32 million and the additional paid-in capital was increased by $32 million. Affinia Group Inc. remains the primary beneficiary of Affinia Acquisition LLC. The net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest owned in Affinia Acquisition LLC and Affinia India Private Limited was less than $1 million in 2008, $7 million for 2009 and $6 million for 2010.

The aforementioned acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,Business Combinations. The Company engaged independent appraisers to assist in determining the fair values of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets acquired; including trade names, trademarks, developed technology and customer relationships. Purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment until all pertinent information regarding the acquisition is obtained and fully evaluated. Based on our preliminary valuations and purchase accounting adjustments, we recorded $30 million as goodwill at the end of 2008. In 2009 goodwill was reduced by $7 milliontax provision related to certain purchase accounting adjustments.

Affinia Hong Kong Limited is reporting its financial results on a one-month reporting lag. There are no arrangements between the primary beneficiary, Affinia Group Inc., and the VIE, Affinia Acquisition LLC, that would require financial support be provided to the VIE. Additionally, the primary beneficiary has not imposed any restrictions on the VIE and there are no recourse provisions in the acquisition agreement. Affinia Acquisition LLC received a contribution of $50 million for the purchase of Affinia Hong Kong Limited in the fourth quarter of 2008. Noncontrolling interest decreased to $46 million as of December 31, 2009 from $60 million as of December 31, 2008. The noncontrolling interest decreased $21 million following Affinia Group Inc.’s acquisition of an additional 35% ownership interest in Affinia Acquisition LLC offset by a $7 million increase related to the net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in Afffinia Acquisition LLC and our joint venture in India.discontinued operations was $33 million.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:

(Dollars in millions)  Preliminary
Allocation
   Adjustments  Final
Allocation
 

Current assets

  $36    $—     $36  

Property, plant and equipment

   38     1    39  

Customer relationships

   7     —      7  

Non-competition agreement

   2     —      2  

Goodwill

   30     (7  23  
              

Total acquired assets

  $113    $(6 $107  
              

Current liabilities

   42     (8  34  

Other liabilities

   12     2    14  
              

Total liabilities assumed

   54     (6  48  
              

Net assets acquired

  $59    $—     $59  
              

Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities were recorded at historical carrying values, given the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. Inventory, other non-current assets, long-term debt, and other non-current liabilities outstanding as of the effective date of the acquisition have been allocated based on management’s estimate of fair market value which approximates book value. Customer relationships with estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 15 years have been valued using an income approach, which utilized a discounted cash flow method. The non-competition agreement with an estimated useful life of 6 years was valued utilizing a form of the discounted cash flow method to determine the value of lost income.

Note 6. Venezuelan Operations

As required by U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2010, we accounted for Venezuela as a highly inflationary economy because the three-year cumulative inflation rate for Venezuela using the blended Consumer Price Index (which is associated with the city of Caracas) and the National Consumer Price Index (developed commencing in 2008 and covering the entire country of Venezuela) exceeded 100%.

Effective January 1, 2010, our Venezuelan subsidiary uses the U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. The financial statements of our subsidiary must be re-measured into the Company’s reporting currency (U.S. Dollar) and future exchange gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities are reflected in current earnings, rather than exclusively in the equity section of the balance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer considered highly inflationary. The local currency in Venezuela is the bolivar fuerte (“VEF”).

On January 11, 2010, the Venezuelan government devalued the country’s currency and changed to a two-tier exchange structure. The official exchange rate moved from 2.15 VEF per U.S. Dollar to 2.60 for essential goods and 4.30 for non-essential goods and services, with our products falling into the non-essential category. A Venezuelan currency control board is responsible for foreign exchange procedures, including approval of requests for exchanges of VEF for U.S. Dollars at the official (government established) exchange rate. Our business in Venezuela has been unsuccessful in obtaining U.S. Dollars at the official exchange rate. An unregulated parallel market existed for exchanging VEF for U.S. Dollars through securities transactions; and our Venezuelan subsidiary had been able to enter into such exchange transactions until May 2010, as discussed further below. The Company used the unregulated parallel market rate to translate the financial statements of its Venezuelan subsidiary through May 2010 because we expected to obtain U.S. Dollars at the unregulated parallel market rate for future dividend remittances. During the second quarter of 2010, the unregulated parallel market was suspended and the Central Bank of Venezuela began regulating the parallel market. The Central Bank of Venezuela has also imposed volume restrictions on the regulated parallel market. We will use the regulated parallel market rate to translate the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary to comply with the regulations of Venezuela and are analyzing the impact of the volume restrictions on our business. The currency exchange limitations to date have not had a material effect on our 2010 earnings and cash flow.

Effective January 1, 2010, we changed the rate used to translate our Venezuelan subsidiary’s transactions and balances from the official exchange rate of 2.15 VEF to the U.S. Dollar to the parallel market rate, which ranged between 5.30 and 7.70 VEF to the U.S. Dollar during 2010. The one-time devaluation had a $2 million negative impact on our pre-tax net income. For 2010, our Venezuela subsidiary represented approximately 1% of our consolidated net sales and it had a net loss attributable to the Company of $8 million. The Venezuelan subsidiary also had $8 million of total assets and $7 million of total liabilities as of December 31, 2010.

Note 7. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

In accordance with ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Affinia and its wholly owned subsidiaries, majority-owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities (“VIE”) for which Affinia (or one of its subsidiaries) is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Equity investments in which we exercise significant influence but do not control are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in which we are not able to exercise significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the cost method. Affinia Hong Kong Limited and Affinia India Private Limited are reporting their financial results on a one-month reporting lag.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of the more significant estimates include valuation of deferred tax assets and inventories; workers compensation; sales return, rebate and warranty accruals; restructuring, environmental and product liability accruals; valuation of postemployment and postretirement benefits and allowances for doubtful accounts. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The primary type of financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are trade accounts receivable. The Company limits its credit risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and, when deemed necessary, requires letters of credit, guarantees or collateral. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from replacement parts wholesalers and retailers serving the aftermarket.

The Company’s net sales to its two largest customers as a percentage of total net sales from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, were 27%, and 8%; for the year ended December 31, 2009, were 29% and 8%; and for the year ended December 31, 2008, were 27% and 8%. Net sales represent the amounts invoiced to customers after adjustments related to rebates, returns and discounts. The Company provides reserves for rebates, returns and discounts at the time of sale which are subsequently applied to the account of specific customers based upon actual activity including the attainment of targeted volumes. The Company’s two largest customers’ accounts receivable as of December 31, 2010 represented approximately 37% and 10%, and as of December 31, 2009 represented 39% and 12% of the total accounts receivable.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are charged or credited to Other Comprehensive Income.

Included in net income (loss) are the gains and losses arising from foreign currency transactions. The impact on income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest of foreign currency transactions including the results of our foreign currency hedging activities amounted to a loss of $10 million, $1 million and $4 million in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash relates to deposits requested by banks for notes payables issued to Haimeng’s suppliers in relation to its purchases.

Accounts receivable

We record trade accounts receivable when revenue is recorded in accordance with our revenue recognition policy and relieves accounts receivable when payments are received from customers. Generally, we do not require collateral for our accounts receivable.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is established through charges to the provision for bad debts. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts on a periodic basis. The evaluation includes historical trends in collections and write-offs, management’s judgment of the probability of collecting accounts, and management’s evaluation of business risk. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to revision as more information becomes available. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $3 million and $2 million at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the FIFO basis for all domestic inventories or average cost basis for non-U.S. inventories.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized, but instead the Company evaluates goodwill for impairment, as of December 31 of each year, unless conditions arise that would require a more frequent evaluation. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are made to determine the fair value of the respective reporting unit. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for goodwill at that time.

Intangibles

We have trade names with indefinite lives and other intangibles with definite lives. In lieu of amortization, we test trade names for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31 of each year, unless conditions arise that would require a more frequent evaluation. Trade names are tested for impairment by comparing the fair value to their carrying values.

Our intangibles with definite lives consist of customer relationships, patents and developed technology. These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 20 years. Certain conditions may arise that could result in a change in useful lives or require us to perform a valuation to determine if the definite lived intangibles are impaired.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt. The amortization of deferred financing costs is classified in interest expense in the statement of operations.

Properties and Depreciation

Fixed assets are being depreciated over their estimated remaining lives using primarily the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and accelerated depreciation methods for federal income tax purposes. Major additions and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, and repairs and maintenance are charged to expense in the period incurred. We review long-lived assets for impairment and general accounting principles require recognition of an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. If the long-lived asset is not recoverable, we measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset.

Useful lives for buildings and building improvements, machinery and equipment, tooling and office equipment, furniture and fixtures principally range from 20 to 30 years, five to ten years, three to five years and three to ten years, respectively. Upon retirement or other disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds is recorded as a gain or loss on disposition.

Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when products are shipped or received, depending on the contractual terms, and risk of loss has transferred to the customer. The Company estimates and records provisions for warranty costs, sales returns, rebates and other allowances based on experience and other relevant factors, when sales are recognized. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty, sales returns, rebates and allowances liabilities on a regular basis and adjusts the recorded amounts as necessary. While management believes that these estimates are reasonable, warranty costs, actual returns, rebates and allowances may differ from estimates. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in sales and the costs of shipping and handling are included in cost of sales. Inter-company sales have been eliminated.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are recognized during the period in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income, with deferred income taxes being provided for the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred income taxes are provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and affiliated companies except to the extent such earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested in the subsidiary or affiliate. In cases where foreign tax credits will not offset U.S. income taxes, appropriate provisions are included in the combined or consolidated statement of operations.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company adopted the provisions of general accounting principles relating to uncertain tax positions (referred to as FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. Accordingly, the Company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Financial Instruments

The reported fair values of financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and long-term debt, are based on a variety of factors. Where available, fair values represent quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on assumptions concerning the implied market volatilities, amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates reflecting varying degrees of credit and market risk. Fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could be realized as of the balance sheet date or that will be realized in the future. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the book value of some of our financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable, approximated their fair values. The fair value of long-term debt is disclosed in “Note 11. Debt. ”

Environmental Compliance and Remediation

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Estimated costs are based upon current laws and regulations, existing technology and the most probable method of remediation. The costs are not discounted and exclude the effects of inflation. If the cost estimates result in a range of equally probable amounts, the lower end of the range is accrued.

Pension Plans

The Company maintains six defined benefit pension plans associated with its Canadian operations. The annual net periodic pension costs are determined on an actuarial basis.

Advertising Costs

Advertising expenses included in continuing operations were $26, $25 and $27 million for the years 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. The advertising expenses included in discontinued operations, were $2, $1 and nil for the years 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. Advertising costs are recognized as selling expenses at the time advertising is incurred.

Promotional Programs

Cooperative advertising programs conducted with customers that promote the Company’s products are accrued as a rebate based on anticipated total amounts to be rebated to customers over the period of the agreement with the customer. Aftermarket distributors typically source their product lines at a particular price point and product category with one “full-line” supplier, such as our company, which covers substantially all of their product requirements. Switching to a new supplier typically requires that a distributor or supplier make a substantial investment to purchase, or “changeover” to, the new supplier’s products. The changeover costs and other incentives incurred in connection with obtaining new business are recognized as selling expense in the period in which the changeover from a competitor’s product to the Company’s product occurs. Infrequently, we enter into a contract with a customer for a set period of time that requires the reimbursement of the incentive by the customer if the future conditions of the contract are not met. In these infrequent cases the incentive is recorded as a reduction of revenue over the life of the contract.

Insurance

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks, including workers’ compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and the company-funded portion of employee-related health care benefits. Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. The Company incurred $3 million, $4 million and $5 million for the years ended 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Free-Standing Derivatives

The Company is subject to various financial risks during the normal course of business operations, including but not limited to, adverse changes to interest rates, currency exchange rates, counterparty creditworthiness, and commodity prices. Pursuant to prudent risk management principles, the Company may utilize appropriate financial derivative instruments in order to mitigate the potential impact of these factors. The Company’s policies strictly prohibit the use of derivatives for speculative purposes.

In 2010, the Company’s derivative instrument usage was limited to standard currency forward transactions intended to offset the earnings impact related to the periodic revaluation of specific non-functional currency denominated monetary working capital accounts and intercompany financing arrangements.

The Company does not seek hedge accounting treatment for its currency derivative transactions because the earnings impact from both the underlying exposures and the hedge transactions are recognized in each accounting period.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for the employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes model to measure stock-based compensation expense at the date of grant. The compensation expense for the year was less than $1 million for 2008, $1 million in 2009 and less than $1 million in 2010.

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the 2005 Stock Plan. The 2005 Stock Plan was amended on August 25, 2010 and on December 2, 2010 to increase the maximum shares of common stock that may be subject to awards. The 2005 Stock Plan permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants of the Company and its affiliates. A maximum of 350,000 shares of common stock may be subject to awards under the 2005 Stock Plan. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2005 Stock Plan (or pursuant to outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment on account of mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock dividends and other dilutive changes in the common stock. Shares of common stock covered by awards that terminate or lapse and shares delivered by a participant or withheld to pay the minimum statutory withholding rate, in each case, will again be available for grant under the 2005 Stock Plan. Refer to “Note 13. Stock Incentive Plan” for further information on and discussion of our stock options.

On August 25, 2010, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. commenced an offer to certain eligible holders of stock options to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock for restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”). The RSUs granted in connection with the option exchange are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and a new Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. The RSUs are subject to performance-based and market-based vesting restrictions, which differ from the performance and time-based vesting restrictions applicable to the exchanged stock options. We will estimate the fair value of restricted stock unit awards using the value of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock prior to vesting. The fair value of the RSUs will be expensed either pro rata over the requisite service term or in full if the requisite service period has passed when the RSUs vest in accordance with the performance conditions listed above. Stock-based compensation expense, which would be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits was not recorded for 2010 as the performance condition has not been met.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Affinia Group Holdings Inc. started a deferred compensation plan in 2008 that permits executives to defer receipt of all or a portion of the amounts payable under Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s non-equity incentive compensation plan. All amounts deferred will be treated solely for purposes of the plan to have been notionally invested in the common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. As such, the accounts under the plan will reflect investment gains and losses associated with an investment in the Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. matches 25% of the deferral with additional restricted stock units, which are subject to vesting as provided in the plan.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issuedASU 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This update requires additional disclosure within the roll forward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the update requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance on disclosures in the first quarter of 2010. There are also additional new disclosure requirements for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 measurements, which are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB amended ASC 310, “Receivables,” with ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses,” to require additional information related to financing receivables, including loans and trade accounts receivable with contractual maturities exceeding one year. With the exception of disclosures related to activity occurring during a reporting period, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, the provisions of this update are effective as of December 31, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-20 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 8.5. Inventories, net

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the FIFO basis for all domestic inventories or average cost basis for non-U.S. inventories. Inventories are reduced by an allowance for slow-moving and obsolete inventories based on management’s review of on-hand inventories compared to historical and estimated future sales and usage. A summary of inventories, net is provided in the table below:

 

(Dollars in millions)  At December  31,
2009(1)
   At December 31,
2010
   At December 31,
2012
   At December 31,
2013(1)
 

Raw materials

  $103    $120    $77    $67  

Work-in-process

   26     34     19     17  

Finished goods

   301     366     208     137  
          

 

   

 

 
  $430    $520    $304    $221  
          

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The inventory as of December 31, 20092013 excludes $67$74 million of inventory in our Commercial Distribution Europe segment,Chassis group, which is classified in current assets of discontinued operations.

During 2009, we had a change in estimate that adjusted the carrying amount of finished goods inventory. The change results from new information as defined in ASC Topic 250-10. Due to the recent addition of new processes related to certain remanufactured inventory components, we were able to determine the cost of these components. The financial impact of this change in estimate increased inventory and decreased cost of sales by $3 million in 2009.

Note 9.6. Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized, but instead the Company evaluates goodwill for impairment, as of December 31, 2013 was $3 million, which relates to our Filtration segment, and consists of each year, unless conditions ariseone acquisition in 2013 and one acquisition in 2008. In the third quarter of 2013, we acquired a small distributor of filtration products in the UK. We also have $22 million related to our Chassis group that would require a more frequent evaluation. is recorded in current assets of discontinued operations.

In assessingaccordance with ASC Topic 805-740, the recoverabilitytax benefit for the excess of tax-deductible goodwill over the reported amount of goodwill projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are madewas applied to determinefirst reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit. We have tested goodwill for impairment as of the end of the year, and concluded no impairment existed.

In conjunction with the acquisition of the NAPD business, we determined the fair value of intangibles, property, plant and equipment, other assets and liabilities. Based on our valuations and purchase accounting adjustments, we recorded $22 million as goodwill.

In conjunction with the acquisition of Affinia Hong Kong Limited, we determined the fair value of intangibles, property, plant and equipment, other assets and liabilities. Based on our valuations and purchase accounting adjustments, we recorded $30 million as goodwill at the end of 2008 and we have decreased goodwill by $7 million in 2009 for purchase accounting adjustments.

The goodwill also relatesrelated to the initial acquisition in 2004. The tax benefit for the excess of tax deductible goodwill reduced reported goodwill by $4 million during 2012. The reported amount of goodwill for the 2004 acquisition was reduced to zero, and a minor acquisitionthe remaining tax benefit will reduce the basis of intangible assets purchased in the second quarter2004 acquisition. Any remaining tax benefit reduces the income tax provision.

The following table summarizes our goodwill activity, which is related to our Filtration segment and our Chassis group, during 2012 and 2013:

(Dollars in millions)    

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $28  

Tax benefit reductions

   (4
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $24  

Goodwill related to Chassis group reclassified to discontinued operations

   (22

Acquisition

   1  
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $3  
  

 

 

 

Note 7. Other Intangible Assets

As of 2008. December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company’s other intangible assets primarily consisted of trade names, customer relationships, and developed technology. The Company recorded approximately $9 million, $6 million and $3 million of intangible asset amortization in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, which includes $6 million, $2 million and $1 million for 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, related to our discontinued operations. The discontinued operations for our Brake North America and Asia group and the Chassis group ceased amortization in 2012 and at the end of 2013, respectively, because the groups were classified in current assets of discontinued operations. We anticipate amortization of less than $1 million for 2014 through 2019 on a continuing basis. Amortization expense is calculated on a straight line basis over 5 to 20 years. We determine on a periodic basis whether the lives and the method for amortization are accurate.

For the goodwill and intangible assets associated with the 2004 acquisition, in accordance with ASC Topic 805-740, the tax benefit for the excess of tax-deductible goodwill over the reported amount of goodwill iswas applied to first reduce the goodwill related to the Acquisition.acquisition to zero. The reported amount of goodwill for the 2004 acquisition was reduced to zero in 2013 and the remaining tax benefit will reduce the basis of intangible assets purchased in the 2004 acquisition. The tax benefit for the excess of tax deductible goodwill reduced reported goodwillintangible assets by approximately $8$4 million during 2009 and 2010. The amount of goodwill remaining at the end2013.

Trade names are tested for impairment annually as of December 31 2010 relatingof each year by comparing their fair value to their carrying values. The fair value for each trade name was established based upon a royalty savings approach. We determined that there were impairments of other intangible assets of less than $1 million in 2012 and 2013. A rollforward of the other intangibles and trade names for 2012 and 2013 is shown below:

(Dollars in millions)  Trade
Names
  Customer
Relationships
  Developed
Technology/

Other
  Total 

Balance at December 31, 2011(1)

  $36   $47   $11   $94  

Amortization

   —     (4  (2  (6
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   36    43    9    88  

Amortization

   —     (2  (1  (3

Tax benefit reductions

   (1  (2  (1  (4

Additions

   —     1    —     1  

Intangibles related to the Chassis group reclassified to current assets of discontinued operations

   (5  (13  (4  (22
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $30   $27   $3   $60  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The intangible assets as of December 31, 2011 exclude $53 million of intangible assets in our Brake North America and Asia group, which were classified in current assets of discontinued operations.

Accumulated amortization for the intangibles was $39 million and $42 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average amortization period by class of intangible was the following: 19 years for customer relationships and 17 years for developed technology and other intangibles.

Note 8. Derivatives

The Company’s financial derivative assets and liabilities consist of standard currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps. The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

All derivative instruments are recognized on our balance sheet at fair value using observable market data information reported by recognized independent third-party financial information providers. The fair value measurements of our interest rate swap contracts and currency forward contracts are based upon Level 2 inputs. The amount shown for the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps are based on the applicable prevailing interest rates as of year-end. The Company’s currency forward transactions fair value amounts reflect the applicable prevailing currency forward rates at year-end. Based upon the Company’s periodic assessment of our own creditworthiness, and of the creditworthiness of the counterparties to our derivative instruments, fair value measurements are not adjusted for incremental credit or liquidity risk.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques noted in FASB ASC 820:

A.Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings models).

B.Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

C.Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

Our fair value of interest rate swaps and our currency forward contract derivatives at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are set forth in the table below:

(Dollars in Millions)  Asset
(Liability)
   Level 2   Valuation
Technique

December 31, 2013:

      

Interest rate swap contracts

  $11    $11    A

Foreign currency forward contracts

   —       —      A

December 31, 2012:

      

Foreign currency forward contracts

  $—      $—      A

Currency Forward Contract Derivatives

Our currency forward contracts are valued using then-current spot and forward market data as provided by external financial institutions. We enter into short-term currency forward contracts with banking institutions of only the highest tiered credit ratings and thus the counterparty credit risk associated with these contracts is not considered significant.

Our currency forward contracts are not designated as hedges of specific monetary asset balances subject to currency risks. Changes in the fair value of these currency forward contracts are recognized in income each accounting period. At December 31, 2013, the aggregate notional amount of our currency forward contracts was $86 million having a fair market value of less than $1 million in assets and liabilities.

The Company’s outstanding currency forward contracts are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Other current assets” or “Other accrued expenses,” accordingly. Currency forward contract gains and losses are recognized in “Other income (loss), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the reporting period of occurrence. The Company has not recorded currency forward contract gains (losses) to other comprehensive income (loss) nor has it reclassified prior period currency derivative results from other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings during the last twelve months. The Company does not anticipate that it will record any currency forward contract gains or losses to other comprehensive income (loss) or that it will reclassify prior period currency forward contract results from other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings in the next twelve months.

The notional amount of our outstanding currency forward contracts were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Notional
Amount
 

As of December 31, 2013

  $86  

As of December 31, 2012

  $69  

Currency forward contract gains and losses are recognized in “Other income (loss), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the reporting period of occurrence. The short-term currency exchange rate forward contracts are intended to offset the currency exchange gain (loss) related to the initial 2004 acquisitionre-measurement process. The currency forward contract gains and losses are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

  Year
Ended
December 31,
2011
   Year
Ended
December 31,
2012
   Year
Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

  $1    $2    $1  

Interest Rate Derivatives

On April 25, 2013, we entered into interest rate swaps having an aggregate notional value of $300 million to effectively fix the rate of interest on a portion of our Term Loan B-2 until April 25, 2020. The Company funds its business operations with a combination of fixed and floating-rate debt. Therefore, our reported results from operations may be adversely impacted by rising interest rates. The Company’s interest rate risk policy seeks to minimize the long-term cost of debt, subject to a limitation of the maximum percentage of net floating-rate debt versus total debt outstanding.

While our policy does not require that we maintain a specific ratio of net floating-rate debt as a proportion of total debt outstanding, we use interest rate swaps to manage the ratio of net floating-rate debt to total debt outstanding within our policy target range, thereby reducing the potential impact that interest rate variability may have on our consolidated financial results. Our policy strictly prohibits the use of interest rate derivatives to generate trading profits or to otherwise speculate on interest rate movements.

We have designated our interest rate swaps as “cash flow” hedges as described in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). At the inception of the hedge, the Company formally documents its hedge relationships and risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking the hedge. In addition, the documentation identifies the interest rate swaps as a hedge of specific interest payments on variable rate debt, with the objective to perfectly offset the variability of interest expense as related to specific floating-rate debt. We also specify that the effectiveness of the interest rate swaps in mitigating interest expense variability shall be assessed using the “Hypothetical Derivative Method” as described in ASC 815.

The interest rate swaps are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Other current assets” or “Other accrued expenses,” accordingly. In compliance with ASC 815, the Company formally assesses the effectiveness of its interest rate swaps at inception and on a quarterly basis thereafter. These assessments have established that swaps have been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting the interest expense variability of the underlying floating rate debt and are therefore eligible for cash flow hedge accounting treatment, pursuant to ASC 815.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), to the extent such cash flow hedges are effective. Amounts are reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) when the underlying hedged items are recognized, during the period that a hedge transaction is $11 million. Onceterminated, or whenever a portion of the reportedhedge transaction results are deemed ineffective. We reclassified $2 million from other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense in 2013. There have been no gains or losses reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness related to any of the Company’s interest rate swap transactions, nor were there gains or losses reclassified to income due to early termination of designated cash-flow hedge transactions as of December 31, 2013.

The notional amount of goodwillinterest rate swaps outstanding are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Notional Amount 

As of December 31, 2013

  $300  

As of December 31, 2012

  $—   

Note 9. Debt

Debt consists of the following:

(Dollars in millions)

  December 31,
2012
  December 31,
2013
 

9% Senior subordinated notes, due November 2014

  $367   $—   

10.75% Senior secured notes, due August 2016

   179    —   

7.75% Senior notes, due May 2021

   —     250  

Term Loan B-1, due April 2016

   —     199  

Term Loan B-2, due April 2020

   —     465  

ABL revolver, due April 2018

   —     —   

Other debt

   23    23  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   569    937  

Less: current portion(1)

   (23  (30
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $546   $907  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The current portion consists of $20 million related to our Poland operations with a rate of one month LIBOR plus 0.9 points and $3 million related to our China operations as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. Additionally, the current portion includes $7 million of current maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2013.

Scheduled maturities of debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

Year

  Amount 

2014

  $30  

2015

   7  

2016

   199  

2017

   5  

2018

   4  

2019 and thereafter

   692  
  

 

 

 

Total debt

  $937  
  

 

 

 

The fair value of debt is as follows:

Fair Value of Debt at December 31, 2012

(Dollars in millions)  Book
Value
of Debt
   Fair
Value
Factor
  Fair
Value
of Debt
 

Senior subordinated notes, due November 2014(1)

  $367     100.25 $368  

Senior secured notes, due August 2016(1)

   179     108.43  194  

ABL revolver, due May 2017(2)

   —      100  —   

Other debt(2)

   23     100  23  
     

 

 

 

Total fair value of debt at December 31, 2012

     $585  
     

 

 

 

Fair Value of Debt at December 31, 2013

(Dollars in millions)

  Book Value
of Debt
   Fair Value
Factor
  Fair Value
of Debt
 

Senior notes, due May 2021(1)

  $250     96.06 $240  

Term Loan B-1, due April 2016(1)

   199     100.63  200  

Term Loan B-2, due April 2020(1)

   465     101.38  471  

ABL revolver, due April 2018(2)

   —      100  —   

Other debt(2)

   23     100  23  
     

 

 

 

Total fair value of debt at December 31, 2013

     $934  
     

 

 

 

(1)The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated based on quoted market prices obtained through broker or pricing services and categorized within Level 2 of the hierarchy. The fair value of our debt that is publicly traded in the secondary market is classified as Level 2 and is based on current market yields obtained through broker or pricing services.
(2)The carrying value of fixed rate short-term debt approximates fair value because of the short term nature of these instruments, and the carrying value of the Company’s current floating rate debt instruments approximates fair value because of the variable interest rates pertaining to those instruments. The fair value of debt is categorized within Level 2 of the hierarchy.

ABL Revolver

We replaced our Old ABL Revolver with a new ABL Revolver on April 25, 2013. The ABL Revolver comprises a revolving credit facility of up to $175 million for borrowings available solely to the U.S. domestic borrowers, including (a) a $30 million sub-limit for letters of credit and (b) a $15 million swingline facility. Availability under the ABL Revolver is based upon monthly (or more frequent under certain circumstances) borrowing base valuations of our eligible inventory and accounts receivable, among other things, and is reduced by certain reserves in effect from time to time.

At December 31, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver. We had an additional $117 million of availability after giving effect to $10 million in outstanding letters of credit and less than $1 million for borrowing base reserves as of December 31, 2013.

Maturity. The ABL Revolver is scheduled to mature on April 25, 2018.

Guarantees and collateral. The indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under the ABL Revolver are unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis by the Company and certain of its current and future U.S. subsidiaries, and are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions and exclusions, by a first-priority lien on accounts receivable, inventory, cash, deposit accounts, securities accounts and proceeds of the foregoing and certain assets related thereto and a second-priority lien on the collateral that secures the Term Loans on a first-priority basis.

Mandatory prepayments. If at any time the outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver (including outstanding letters of credit and swingline loans) exceed the lesser of (i) the borrowing base as in effect at such time and (ii) the aggregate revolving commitments as in effect at such time, the borrowers will be required to prepay an amount equal to such excess and/or cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit.

Voluntary prepayments. Subject to certain conditions, the ABL Revolver allows the borrowers to voluntarily reduce the amount of the revolving commitments and to prepay the loans without premium or penalty other than customary breakage costs for LIBOR rate contracts.

Interest rates and fees. Outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) a base rate plus the applicable spread, as set forth below or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread, as set forth below. Swingline loans bear interest at a base rate plus the applicable spread. The Company will pay a commission on letters of credit issued under the New ABL Revolver at a rate equal to the applicable spread for loans based upon the LIBOR rate.

Level

  Average
Aggregate
Availability
  Base Rate Loans and
Swingline Loans
  LIBOR Loans 

I

  <$50,000,000   1.00  2.00

II

  > $50,000,000

but<

$100,000,000

   0.75  1.75

III

  >$100,000,000   0.50  1.50

The Company will pay certain fees with respect to the ABL Revolver, including (i) an unused commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the credit facility of 0.25% per annum in the event that more than 50% of the commitments (excluding swingline loans) under the credit facility are utilized, and 0.375% per annum in the event that less than or equal to 50% of the commitments (excluding swingline loans) under the credit facility are utilized and (ii) customary annual administration fees and fronting fees in respect of letters of credit equal to 0.125% per annum on the stated amount of each letter of credit outstanding during each fiscal quarter. During an event of default, all loans and other obligations under the ABL Revolver may bear interest at a rate 2.00% in excess of the otherwise applicable rate of interest.

Cash Dominion. Commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 12.5% of the total borrowing base and $17.5 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability has been greater than such thresholds at all times for 60 consecutive days, amounts in the Company’s deposit accounts and the deposit accounts of the guarantors (other than certain excluded accounts) will be transferred daily into a blocked account held by the administrative agent and applied to reduce the outstanding amounts under the ABL Revolver.

Covenants. The ABL Revolver contains negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to: create liens and encumbrances; incur additional indebtedness; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of their capital stock; amend certain material governance documents; change the nature of the business of the borrowers and their subsidiaries; redeem or repurchase capital stock or prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change the borrowers’ fiscal periods; and enter into certain restrictive agreements. The ABL Revolver also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a change of control.

In addition, commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 10.0% of the total borrowing base and $15.0 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability under the ABL Revolver has been greater than such thresholds at all times, in each case, for 30 consecutive days, the Company will be required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0x measured for the 2004 acquisitionlast 12-month period. The fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.05x as of December 31, 2013. If none of the covenant triggers have occurred, the impact of falling below the fixed charge coverage ratio would not be a default but instead would limit our ability to pursue certain operational or financial transactions (e.g. acquisitions).

Indenture

Senior Notes.On April 25, 2013, Affinia Group Inc. issued $250 million of Senior Notes as part of the refinancing. The Senior Notes accrue interest at the rate of 7.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Senior Notes will mature on May 1, 2021. The terms of the Indenture provide that, among other things, the Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment to all of the Company’s and all of Affinia Group Inc.’s 100% owned current and future domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s and Guarantors’ existing and future subordinated debt. The Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all of the liabilities and obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are effectively junior in right of payment to all of the Company’s and the Guarantors’ secured indebtedness, including the Term Loans and the ABL Revolver, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The outstanding balance of the Senior Notes at December 31, 2013 was $250 million.

Guarantees. The Guarantors guarantee the Company’s obligations under the Notes on a senior unsecured basis.

Interest Rate. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 7.75% per annum. Interest on the Notes is reducedpayable in cash semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1, 2013.

Other Covenants. The Indenture contains affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the Company’s ability (as well as those of the Company’s subsidiaries) to: incur additional debt; provide guarantees and issue mandatorily redeemable preferred stock; pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments including the prepayment of certain indebtedness; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; enter into transactions with affiliates; create or incur liens; and merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of its assets.

Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to zero,customary grace and cure periods), which include nonpayment, breach of covenants in the Indenture, payment defaults or acceleration of other indebtedness, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare the principal, premium, if any, interest and other monetary obligations on all the Notes to be due and payable immediately.

Term Loan Facility

On April 25, 2013, the Company entered into (i) a Term Loan B-1 in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million and (ii) a Term Loan B-2 in an aggregate principal amount of $470 million. The Term Loan B-1 was offered at a price of 99.75%, of their face value, resulting in approximately $199 million of net proceeds for the Term Loan B-1. The Term Loan B-2 was offered at a price of 99.50%, of their face value, resulting in approximately $468 million of net proceeds for the Term Loan B-2. The $1 million and $2 million original issue discount for the Term Loan B-1 and Term Loan B-2, respectively, will be amortized based on the effective interest rate method and included in interest expense until the Term Loans mature. The Term Loan B-1 amortizes in quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1.00% per annum, with the balance due on April 25, 2016. The Term Loan B-2 amortizes in quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1.00% per annum, with the balance due on April 25, 2020. As of December 31, 2013, $199 million principal amount of Term Loan B-1 was outstanding, net of a $1 million issue discount which is being amortized until the Term Loan B-1 matures and $465 million principal amount of Term Loan B-2 was outstanding, net of a $2 million issue discount which is being amortized until the Term Loan B-2 matures.

Guarantees and collateral. The indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under the Term Loan Facility are unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis by the Company and certain of its current and future U.S. subsidiaries, and are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions and exclusions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the borrower and each guarantor (including (i) a perfected pledge of all of the capital stock of the borrower and each direct, wholly-owned material subsidiary held by the borrower or any guarantor (subject to certain limitations with respect to foreign subsidiaries) and (ii) perfected security interests in, and mortgages on, equipment, general intangibles, investment property, intellectual property, material fee-owned real property, intercompany notes and proceeds of the foregoing) except for certain excluded assets and the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first priority basis, and a second-priority lien on the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first-priority basis.

Mandatory prepayments. The Term Loan Facility requires the following amounts to be applied to prepay the Term Loans, subject to certain thresholds, exceptions and reinvestment rights: 100% of the net proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness), 100% of the net proceeds of certain asset sales (including insurance or condemnation proceeds), other than the collateral securing the ABL Revolver on a first-priority basis, and 50% of excess cash flow with stepdowns to 25% and 0% based on certain leverage targets.

Mandatory prepayments will be allocated ratably between Term Loan B-1 and Term Loan B-2 and, within each, will be applied to reduce remaining amortization payments in the direct order of maturity for the immediately succeeding eight quarters and, thereafter, pro rata.

Voluntary Prepayments. The Company may voluntarily prepay outstanding Term Loans in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty (other than a 1.00% premium payable until, in the case of the Term Loan B-1, six months following April 25, 2013 and, in the case of the Term Loan B-2, one year following April 25, 2013, on (i) the amount of loans prepaid or refinanced with proceeds of long-term bank debt financing or any other financing similar to such borrowings having a lower effective yield or (ii) the amount of loans the terms of which are amended to the same effect), subject to payment of customary breakage costs in the case of LIBOR rate loans. Optional prepayments of the Term Loans will be applied to the remaining tax benefit reducesinstallments thereof at the basisdirection of intangible assets purchasedthe Company.

Interest Rates. Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Facility accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) a base rate plus the applicable spread or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread. The applicable margin for borrowings under the Term Loan B-1 is 1.75% with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.75% with respect to LIBOR rate borrowings, and the applicable margin for borrowing under the Term Loan B-2 is 2.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and 3.50% with respect to LIBOR rate borrowings. The LIBOR rate is subject to a floor of 0.75% per annum with respect to Term Loan B-1 and 1.25% per annum with respect to Term Loan B-2. Overdue principal with respect to the Term Loans will bear interest at a rate 2.00% in excess of the 2004 acquisition. Any remaining tax benefit reducesotherwise applicable rate of interest and other overdue amounts with respect to the income tax provision.

Term Loans will bear interest at a rate of 2.00% in excess of the rate applicable to base rate borrowings.

Covenants. The Term Loan Facility contains negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to create liens and encumbrances; incur additional indebtedness; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of their capital stock; amend certain material governance documents; change the nature of the business of the borrower and its subsidiaries; redeem or repurchase capital stock or prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change the borrower’s fiscal periods; and enter into certain restrictive agreements. The Term Loan Facility also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a change of control.

Deferred Financing

During the second quarter of 2013, we recorded a write-off of $5 million to interest expense for unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of our Secured Notes and Subordinated Notes. We also recorded during the second quarter of 2013 a write-off of $3 million to interest expense for the replacement of our Old ABL Revolver with a new ABL Revolver. In addition, we recorded $14 million in total deferred financing costs related to the issuance of our Senior Notes and Term Loans as part of the refinancing and $1 million in total deferred financing costs associated with the ABL Revolver. The unamortized deferred financing costs will be charged to interest expense over the next eight years for the Senior Notes, seven years for Term Loan B-2, five years for the ABL Revolver and three years for Term Loan B-1.

During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a write-off of less than $1 million to interest expense for unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of $22.5 million of the Secured Notes. Additionally, we recorded $1 million in total deferred financing costs related to our Old ABL Revolver.

The following table summarizes our goodwillthe deferred financing activity which is relatedfrom December 31, 2012 to December 30, 2013:

(Dollars in millions)    

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $15  

Amortization

   (4

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   (8

Deferred financing costs

   15  
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $18  
  

 

 

 

Subsequent Event

On February 4, 2014, we entered into (i) the First Amendment to the OnCredit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2014 (the “Term Loan Amendment”), among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, as administrative agent and Off-highway segment, during 2009the lenders party thereto and 2010:(ii) the First Amendment to the ABL Credit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2014 (the “ABL Amendment”), among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., certain subsidiaries party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A, as administrative agent. The Term Loan Amendment and the ABL Amendment are referred to herein collectively as the “Amendments.”

The Amendments, among other things, amend certain negative covenants to permit the sale of the Chassis group and to permit certain restricted payments and loans and advances to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. The Term Loan Amendment also amends certain prepayment terms in connection with the Chassis sale.

(Dollars in millions)    

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $58  

Tax benefit reductions

   (8

Affinia Hong Kong Limited acquisition adjustments

   (7
     

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $43  

Goodwill related to acquisition of NAPD business

   22  

Tax benefit reductions

   (8

Currency and other adjustments

   2  
     

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $59  
     

The ABL Amendment contains additional amendments which, among other things, (i) reduce the dominion threshold to the greater of 12.5% of the total borrowing base and $12.5 million and (ii) amend the trigger period such that, commencing on the day that an event of default occurs or availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 10.0% of the total borrowing base and $10.0 million and continuing until no event of default has existed and availability under the ABL Revolver has been greater than such thresholds at all times, in each case, for 30 consecutive days, the Company is required to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 1.0x measured for the last 12-month period.

Note 10. Other Intangible Assets

As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Company’s other intangible assets primarily consisted of trade names, customer relationships, and developed technology. The Company recorded approximately $8 million, $9 million and $8 million of intangible asset amortization in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We anticipate $9 million in amortization in each of the next four years and $8 million in 2015. In 2010, we acquired the NAPD business and as a result we increased our customer relationships by $8 million, unpatented technology by $5 million and non-competition agreement by $1 million. Amortization expense is calculated on a straight line basis over 5 to 20 years. We determine on a periodic basis whether the lives and the method for amortization are accurate.

Trade names are tested for impairment annually as of December 31 of each year by comparing their fair value to their carrying values. The fair value for each trade name was established based upon a royalty savings approach. We determined that there were impairments of other intangible assets of $2 million, $4 million and nil in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Due to the downturn in the credit markets and intensified competition in the United Kingdom and other Western European countries, the Commercial Distribution Europe segment trade name was impaired $2 million in 2008. In 2009, the Commercial Distribution Europe segment was impaired $4 million due to the decrease in carrying value of the intangibles which were not recoverable through the sales process. The impairments in 2008 and 2009 were recorded in discontinued operations. A rollforward of the other intangibles and trade names for 2009 and 2010 is shown below:

(Dollars in millions)  December
31, 2008
   Amortization  Impairment  Other  December
31, 2009
   Amortization  Impairment   Other   December
31, 2010
 

Trade names

  $48    $—     $—     $—     $48    $—     $—      $—      $48  

Customer relationships

   100     (7  (3  —      90     (6  —       8     92  

Developed technology/Other

   15     (2  (1  (1  11     (2  —       7     16  
                                         

Total

  $163    $(9 $(4 $(1 $149    $(8 $—      $15    $156  
                                         

Accumulated amortization for the intangibles was $43 million and $51 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The weighted average amortization period by class of intangible was the following: 19 years for customer relationships and 12 years for developed technology and other intangibles.

Note 11. Debt

On August 13, 2009, we refinanced our former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and accounts receivable facility. The refinancing consisted of the ABL Revolver and the Secured Notes, the proceeds of which were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our former term loan facility, revolving credit facility and accounts receivable facility, as well as to settle interest rate derivatives and to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing. The ABL Revolver and the Secured Notes replaced our revolving credit facility, which would have otherwise matured on November 30, 2010, our former term loan facility, which would have otherwise matured on November 30, 2011, and our accounts receivables facility, which would have otherwise matured on November 30, 2009.

On December 1, 2010, we issued an irrevocable notice of redemption to redeem $22.5 million aggregate principal amount of our Secured Notes on December 31, 2010, pursuant to their terms at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount of such notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

On December 9, 2010, we completed an offering of an additional $100 million of Additional Notes. The Additional Notes have been issued at a price equal to 100% of their face value. The Additional Notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated November 30, 2004, pursuant to which Affinia Group Inc. issued its existing outstanding $267 million aggregate principal amount of the Initial Notes. Other than with respect to the date of issuance and issue price, the Additional Notes have the same terms as, and are treated as a single class with, the Initial Notes. Affinia Group Inc.’s obligations under the Additional Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinia Intermediate Holdings Inc. and certain of Affinia Groups Inc.’s current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The Company used the proceeds from the offering of the Additional Notes to finance its $24 million acquisition of the remaining 50% interest of Affinia India Private Limited and to finance our $52 million acquisition of the NAPD business on December 16, 2010. Debt consists of the following:

   At December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2009  2010 

9% Senior subordinated notes, due November 2014

  $267   $367  

10.75% Senior secured notes, due August 2016

   222    200  

ABL revolver, due November 2015

   90    90  

Affiliate debt with rates of 2.9% to 5.4%

   22    39  
         
   601    696  

Less: Current portion

   (12  (27
         
  $589   $669  
         

Scheduled maturities of debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

Year

  Amount 

2011

  $27  

2012

   12  

2013

   —    

2014

   367  

2015

   90  

2016 and thereafter

   200  
     

Total debt

  $696  
     

The fair value of debt is as follows:

Fair Value of Debt at December 31, 2009

(Dollars in millions)  Book
Value
of Debt
   Fair
Value
Factor
  Fair
Value
of Debt
 

Senior subordinated notes, due November 2014

  $267     98.75 $264  

Senior secured notes, due August 2016

   222     107.63  239  

ABL revolver, due November 2015

   90     100  90  

Affiliate debt

   22     100  22  
        

Total fair value of debt at December 31, 2009

     $615  
        

Fair Value of Debt at December 31, 2010

(Dollars in millions)  Book
Value
of Debt
   Fair
Value
Factor
  Fair
Value
of Debt
 

Senior subordinated notes, due November 2014

  $367     102.75 $377  

Senior secured notes, due August 2016

   200     111.00  222  

ABL revolver, due November 2015

   90     100  90  

Affiliate debt

   39     100  39  
        

Total fair value of debt at December 31, 2010

     $728  
        

The carrying value of fixed rate short-term debt approximates fair value because of the short term nature of these instruments, and the carrying value of the Company’s current floating rate debt instruments approximates fair value because of the variable interest rates pertaining to those instruments. The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated based on quoted market prices.

Asset based credit facilities. On August 13, 2009, Affinia Group Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a four-year $315 million ABL Revolver that includes (i) a revolving credit facility (the “U.S. Facility”) of up to $295 million for borrowings solely to the U.S. domestic borrowers, including (a) a $40 million sub-limit for letters of credit and (b) a $30 million swingline facility, and (ii) a revolving credit facility (the “Canadian Facility”) of up to $20 million for Canadian Dollar denominated revolving loans solely to a Canadian borrower. Availability under the ABL Revolver is based upon monthly (or more frequent under certain circumstances) borrowing base valuations of Affinia Group Inc.’s eligible inventory and accounts receivable and is reduced by certain reserves in effect from time to time. The ABL Collateral consists of all accounts receivable, inventory, cash (other than certain cash proceeds of Notes Collateral (as defined in the indenture governing the Secured Notes)) and proceeds of the foregoing and certain assets related thereto, in each case held by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc. and certain of their subsidiaries.

On November 30, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the credit agreement governing the ABL Revolver. The ABL Revolver has been amended to, among other things, (a) increase the amount of additional unsecured indebtedness that we may incur from $100 million to $300 million and provide certain conditions to any issuance of such indebtedness in excess of $100 million, (b) amend the covenants with respect to: making certain dividends, distributions, restricted payments and investments; extending, renewing and refinancing certain existing indebtedness; amending certain material documents; and issuing and disposing of certain equity interests, (c) reduce the pricing spread applicable to each type of loan by 150 basis points at each level of average aggregate availability and remove the floor formerly applicable to the LIBOR rate and the BA rate, (d) extend the maturity date from August 13, 2013 to November 30, 2015 (subject to early termination under certain limited circumstances), (e) allow for prepayments of certain outstanding indebtedness with the proceeds of an initial public offering (if Affinia Group Holdings Inc. undertakes an initial public offering) and permit the merger of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. with and into Affinia Group Holdings Inc. upon satisfaction of certain preconditions to such merger and (f) modify certain other provisions thereof.

At December 31, 2010, we had $90 million outstanding under the ABL Revolver. During the year, we borrowed funds at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.5% under this facility. We had an additional $191 million of availability after giving effect to $15 million in outstanding letters of credit and $3 million for borrowing base reserves as of December 31, 2010.

Mandatory Prepayments. If at any time the outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver (including outstanding letters of credit and swingline loans) exceed the lesser of (i) the borrowing base as in effect at such time and (ii) the aggregate revolving commitments as in effect at such time, we will be required to prepay an amount equal to such excess and/or cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit.

The maturity date of the ABL Revolver is November 30, 2015, subject to early termination if our senior subordinated notes which mature less than six months after such date are not refinanced, renewed or extended, or fully redeemed, fully cash defeased, paid in full or fully cash collateralized, prior to the date which is 91 days before the earlier of November 30, 2015 and the maturity date of the senior subordinated notes.

Voluntary Prepayments. Subject to certain conditions, the ABL Revolver allows us to voluntarily reduce the amount of the revolving commitments and to prepay the loans without premium or penalty other than customary breakage costs for LIBOR rate contracts.

Covenants. The ABL Revolver contains affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability to create liens and encumbrances; incur debt; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions and investments; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of our capital stock; amend certain material documents; change the nature of our business; make certain payments of debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change our fiscal periods; and enter into certain restrictive agreements, in each case, subject to certain qualifications and exceptions.

In addition, if availability under the ABL Revolver is less than the greater of 12.5% of the total revolving loan commitments and $39.5 million, we will be required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio, which is defined in the ABL Revolver, of at least 1.10x measured for the last twelve-month period.

Interest Rates and Fees. Outstanding borrowings under the U.S. Facility accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) a base rate plus the applicable spread or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread. Outstanding borrowings under the Canadian Facility accrue interest at an annual rate of interest equal to (i) the Canadian prime rate plus the applicable spread or (ii) the BA rate (the average discount rate of bankers’ acceptances as quoted on the Reuters Screen CDOR page) plus the applicable spread. We pay a commission on letters of credit issued under the U.S. Facility at a rate equal to the applicable spread for loans based upon the LIBOR rate. The ABL Revolver, as amended on November 30, 2010, revises the applicable spread, as set forth below, for purposes of calculating the annual rate of interest applicable to outstanding borrowings under the U.S. Facility and the Canadian Facility. In addition, the 1.50% floor formerly applicable to the LIBOR rate and the BA rate was eliminated.

Level

  Average Aggregate
Availability
 Base Rate
Loans  and
Canadian
Prime  Rate
Loans
  LIBOR Loans
and Canadian
BA Rate
Loans
 

I

  £$105,000,000  1.75%  2.75%

II

  > $105,000,000 but £

$210,000,000

  1.50%  2.50%

III

  > $210,000,000  1.25%  2.25%

We pay certain fees with respect to the ABL Revolver, including (i) an unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion of the credit facility (subject to a step-down to 0.375% in the event more than 50% of the commitments (excluding swingline loans) under the credit facility are utilized) and (ii) customary annual administration fees and fronting fees in respect of letters of credit equal to 0.125% per annum on the stated amount of each letter of credit outstanding during each month. During an event of default, the fee payable under clause (i) shall be increased by 2% per annum.

Secured Notes.On August 13, 2009, Affinia Group Inc. issued $225 million of Secured Notes as part of the refinancing. The Secured Notes were offered at a price of 98.799% of their face value, resulting in approximately $222 million of net proceeds. The approximately $3 million discount will be amortized based on the effective interest rate method and included in interest expense until the Secured Notes mature. Subject to Affinia Group Inc.’s compliance with the covenants described in the indenture securing the Secured Notes, Affinia Group Inc. is permitted to issue more Secured Notes from time to time under the Indenture. The Secured Notes and the additional notes, if any, will be treated as a single class for all purposes of the indenture governing the Secured Notes, including waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. The Secured Notes mature in 2016 and accrue interest at rate of 10.75% per annum payable semiannually. The Secured Notes are senior obligations of Affinia Group Inc.

On December 1, 2010, we issued an irrevocable notice of redemption to redeem $22.5 million aggregate principal amount of our Secured Notes on December 31, 2010, pursuant to their terms at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount of such notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Secured Notes outstanding balance net of the discount was $200 million as of December 31, 2010.

Subordinated Notes. On November 30, 2004, Affinia Group Inc. issued $300 million of Subordinated Notes. The Subordinated Notes and the additional notes, if any, will be treated as a single class for all purposes of the indenture governing the Subordinated Notes, including waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. The Subordinated Notes mature in 2014 and accrue interest at rate of 9% per annum payable semiannually. The Subordinated Notes are senior obligations of Affinia Group Inc.

In June of 2009, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. purchased in the open market approximately $33 million in principal amount of the Subordinated Notes and thereafter contributed such notes to Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., which contributed such notes to Affinia Group Inc. Affinia Group Inc. promptly surrendered such purchased notes for cancellation, which resulted in a pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt of $8 million in 2009.

On December 9, 2010, Affinia Group Inc. completed an offering of $100 million of Additional Notes. The Additional Notes have been issued at a price equal to 100% of their face value. The Additional Notes were issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated November 30, 2004, pursuant to which the Company issued its existing outstanding $267 million aggregate principal amount of Initial Notes. Other than with respect to the date of issuance and issue price, the Additional Notes have the same terms as, and are treated as a single class with, the Initial Notes. Affinia Group Inc.’s obligations under the Additional Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. and certain of our current and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The outstanding balance of the Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2010 was $367 million. Subject to Affinia Group Inc.’s compliance with the covenants described in the indenture securing the Subordinated Notes, Affinia Group Inc. is permitted to issue more Subordinated Notes from time to time under the indenture.

Indenture Provisions. The indentures governing the Secured Notes and the Subordinated Notes limit Affinia Group Inc.’s (and its restricted subsidiaries’) ability to incur and guarantee additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock or issue certain preferred stock; pay dividends on, make other distributions on, redeem or repurchase our capital stock or make certain other restricted payments; create certain liens or encumbrances; issue capital stock; make certain investments or acquisitions; make capital expenditures; pay dividends, make distributions or make other payments from its subsidiaries; changes their lines of business; enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; use assets as security in other transactions; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies and designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries. Subject to certain exceptions, Affinia Group Inc. and its restricted subsidiaries are permitted to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, under the terms of the indentures governing the Secured Notes and the Subordinated Notes.

During 2009, we recorded a write-off of $5 million to interest expense for unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the term loan facility, revolving credit facility and the accounts receivable facility. Additionally, we recorded $22 million in total deferred financing costs related to the new ABL Revolver and the issuance of the Secured Notes.

During 2010, we recorded a write-off of $1 million to interest expense for unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of $22.5 million of the Secured Notes. Additionally, we recorded $5 million in total deferred financing costs related to the amendment to ABL Revolver and the issuance of additional $100 million in Senior Subordinated Notes. The unamortized deferred financing will be charged to interest expense over the next five years for the ABL Revolver, six years for the Secured Notes and four years for the Subordinated Notes. The following table summarizes the deferred financing activity from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in millions)    

As of December 31, 2008

   11  

Amortization

   (4

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   (5

Deferred financing costs

   22  
     

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $24  

Amortization

   (5

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs

   (1

Deferred financing costs

   5  
     

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $23  
     

Note 12. Accounts Receivable Factoring

We have agreements with third party financial institutions to factor certain receivables on a non-recourse basis. The terms of the factoring arrangements provide for the factoring of certain U.S. Dollar-denominated or Canadian Dollar-denominated receivables, which are purchased at the face value amount of the receivable discounted at the annual rate of LIBOR plus a spread on the purchase date. The amount factored is not contractually defined by the factoring arrangements and our use will vary each month based on the amount of underlying receivables and the cash flow needs of the Company.

We began factoring our accounts receivable during the third quarter of 2010. During 2010,2012, the total accounts receivable factored was $156$668 million and the cost incurred on factoring was $2 million.$5 million, which includes our Chassis group and our Brake North America and Asia group. During 2013, the total accounts receivable factored was $541 million and the cost incurred on factoring was $4 million, which includes our Chassis group. Accounts receivable factored by us are accounted for as a sale and removed from the balance sheet at the time of factoring and the cost of the factoring is accountedpresented in either Other income (loss), net, or Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, if it relates to our Chassis Group and our Brake North America and Asia group.

Note 11. Stock Incentive Plan

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our 2005 Stock Plan. The 2005 Stock Plan permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and its affiliates. A maximum of 350,000 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock may be subject to awards under the 2005 Stock Plan. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2005 Stock Plan (or pursuant to outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment on account of mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock dividends and other dilutive changes in the common stock. Shares of common stock covered by awards that terminate or lapse and shares delivered by a participant or withheld to pay the minimum statutory withholding rate, in each case, will again be available for grant under the 2005 Stock Plan.

Administration. The 2005 Stock Plan is administered by the compensation committee of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors. The committee has full power and authority to make, and establish the terms and conditions of any award, and to waive any such terms and conditions at any time (including, without limitation, accelerating or waiving any vesting conditions or payment dates). The committee is authorized to interpret the plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the plan and to make any other determinations that it, in good faith, deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the plan and may delegate such authority as it deems appropriate. The committee may correct any defect or supply an omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the plan in the manner and to the extent the committee deems necessary or desirable and any decision of the committee in the interpretation and administration of the plan shall lie within its sole and absolute good faith discretion and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned.

Options. The committee determines the option price for each option; however, the stock options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. An option holder may exercise an option by written notice and payment of the option price (i) in cash or its equivalent, (ii) by the surrender of a number of shares of common stock already owned by the option holder for at least six months (or such other income.period established by the committee) with a fair market value equal to the exercise price, (iii) if there is a public market for the shares, subject to rules established by the committee, through the delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell shares obtained upon the exercise of the option and to deliver to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. an amount out of the proceeds of the sale equal to the aggregate option price for the shares being purchased or (iv) by another method approved by the committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The committee may grant stock appreciation rights independent of or in connection with an option. The exercise price per share of a stock appreciation right shall be an amount determined by the committee. Generally, each stock appreciation right shall entitle a participant upon exercise to an amount equal to (i) the excess of (1) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share of common stock over (2) the exercise price, multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of common stock covered by the stock appreciation right. Payment shall be made in common stock or in cash, or partly in common stock and partly in cash, all as shall be determined by the committee.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The committee may grant awards of restricted stock units, rights to purchase stock, restricted stock and other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on the fair market value of, shares of common stock. The other stock-based awards will be subject to the terms and conditions established by the committee.

Transferability.Unless otherwise determined by the committee, awards granted under the 2005 Stock Plan are not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Change of Control. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the 2005 Stock Plan), the committee may provide for (i) the termination of an award upon the consummation of the change of control, but only if the award has vested and been paid out or the participant has been permitted to exercise an option in full for a period of not less than 30 days prior to the change of control, (ii) the acceleration of all or any portion of an award, (iii) payment in exchange for the cancellation of an award and/or (iv) the issuance of substitute awards that would substantially preserve the terms of any awards.

Amendment and Termination.Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors may amend, alter or discontinue the 2005 Stock Plan in any respect at any time, but no amendment may diminish any of the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.

Management Stockholders Agreement. All shares issued under the plan will be subject to a management stockholders agreement or a director stockholders agreement, as applicable.

Restrictive Covenant Agreement. Unless otherwise determined by Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors, all award recipients will be obligated to sign the standard Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Proprietary Information Agreement which includes restrictive covenants regarding confidentiality, proprietary information and a one year period restricting competition and solicitation of our clients, customers or employees. In the event a participant breaches these restrictive covenants, any exercise of, or payment or delivery pursuant to, an award may be rescinded by the committee in its discretion in which event the participant may be required to pay to us the amount of any gain realized in connection with, or as a result of, the rescinded exercise, payment or delivery.

Amendment. On November 14, 2006, the Compensation Committee of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. revised the vesting terms applicable to options previously awarded by the Committee to its named executive officers, as well as all other employees, under the Plan. One-half of these options vest in equal portions at the end of each year beginning with the year of the grant and ending December 31, 2009 (the “Vesting Period”), 40% are eligible for vesting in equal portions upon the Company’s achievement of certain specified annual EBITDA performance targets over the Vesting Period and 10% are eligible for vesting in equal portions upon the Company’s achievement of certain net working capital performance targets over the Vesting Period. The Committee has not modified the time-vesting options or the working capital performance options. The Committee elected to modify the vesting terms for the EBITDA performance options so that these options were eligible for vesting in equal portions at the end of each of the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. The Committee also modified the performance targets for those years. The fair value of the modified award was slightly higher than the grant date fair value.

2005 Stock Plan

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the 2005 Stock Plan with a maximum of 227,000 shares of common stock subject to awards. On August 25, 2010, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. increased the number of shares of common stock subject to awards from 227,000 to 300,000, and Affinia Group Holdings Inc. commenced an offer to certain eligible holders of stock options to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock for RSUs with new vesting terms (the “Option Exchange”). The RSUs granted in connection with the Option Exchange are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and the new Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. On December 2, 2010, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. increased the number of shares of common stock subject to awards from 300,000 to 350,000.

A table of the 2005 Stock Plan balances for the restricted stock units, stock options, deferred compensation shares and stock awards is summarized below.

   At December 31, 
   2012   2013 

Restricted stock units

   242,000     205,508  

Stock options

   26,835     26,355  

Deferred compensation shares

   30,235     37,744  

Stock award

   163     163  

Shares available

   50,767     80,230  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of shares of common stock subject to awards

   350,000     350,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock Options

As of December 31, 2013, 23,355 stock options had been awarded, all of which were vested. Pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan, each option expires August 1, 2015. The exercise price was $100 per option but was reduced to $62.87 during 2013.

We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes model to measure stock-based compensation expense at the date of grant. Dividend yields were not a factor because there were no cash dividends declared during 2011 and 2012. Although a dividend of $352 million was declared in 2013, there were no grants issued during the year hence there was no effect on the dividend yield. Our weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value assumptions include:

   2011  2012  2013 

Weighted-average effective term

   5.1 years    5.1 years    5.1 years  

Weighted-average risk free interest rate

   4.34  4.34  4.33

Weighted-average expected volatility

   39.9  39.9  40.0

Weighted-average fair value of options (Dollars in millions)

  $1   $1   $1  

The fair value of the stock option grants is amortized to expense over the vesting period. The Company reduces the overall compensation expense by a turnover rate consistent with historical trends. Stock-based compensation expense, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits were nil for 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Options

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

34,062

Granted

1,550

Exercised

(2,000

Exchanged

(825

Forfeited/expired

(4,107

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

28,680

Forfeited/expired

(4,845

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

23,835

Forfeited/expired

(480

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

23,355

Option Exchange

Affinia Group Holdings Inc. completed an offer to certain eligible holders of stock options to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock for RSUs with new vesting terms (the “Option Exchange”). The Option Exchange election period commenced on August 25, 2010 and expired on September 24, 2010. The completion of the Option Exchange for the RSUs occurred on October 18, 2010 and 100% of the eligible option holders elected to participate. A total of 24 eligible employees and directors participated in the Option Exchange. In addition, three eligible employees and directors who did not have vested options received RSUs. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. accepted for exchange options to purchase a total of 61,868 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. All surrendered options were cancelled in exchange for RSUs. The options had been fully expensed by the exchange date. The total RSUs issued on October 18, 2010 covered 235,000 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock.

On December 23, 2011, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. completed another Option Exchange. The Option Exchange election period commenced on December 1, 2011 and expired on December 23, 2011. The completion of the Option Exchange for the RSUs occurred on December 23, 2011 with 100% of the two eligible option holders electing to participate. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. accepted for exchange options to purchase a total of 825 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. All surrendered options were cancelled in exchange for RSUs. The options had been fully expensed by the exchange date. The total RSUs issued on December 23, 2011 covered 4,000 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock.

Restricted Stock Units

The RSUs granted in connection with the Option Exchanges are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and a new Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.

The RSUs are subject to performance-based and market-based vesting provisions, which differ from the performance and time-based vesting provisions applicable to the exchanged stock options. The RSUs will vest if (i) the RSU holder remains employed with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. on the date that either of the following vesting conditions occurs and (ii) either of the following vesting conditions occurs on or prior to the date on which Cypress ceases to hold any remaining Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock:

Cypress Scenario—Cypress has received aggregate transaction proceeds in cash or marketable securities (not subject to escrow, lock-up, trading restrictions or claw-back) with respect to the disposition of more than 50% of its common equity interests in Affinia Group Holdings Inc. in an amount that represents a per-share equivalent value that is greater than or equal to two times the average per share price paid by Cypress for its aggregate common equity investment in Affinia Group Holdings Inc.; or

IPO Scenario—Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock trades on a public stock exchange at an average closing price of $225 (as adjusted for stock splits) over a 60 consecutive trading day period.

Since the original issue date, the Brake North America and Asia group was distributed on November 2012 and a dividend recapitalization transaction was undertaken in April 2013. These two actions had an impact on the calculation of the overall return to the Holdings’ shareholders. In December 2013, our board of directors approved including the distribution of the Brake North America and Asia group and the recapitalization proceeds that were distributed to Holdings’ shareholders in reducing the Cypress Scenario and IPO Scenario vesting points. The Board approved these two events to reduce the vesting points from $225 to $159.30 under the IPO Scenario and from $200 to $141.60 under the Cypress Scenario.

Additionally, there were 106,369 RSUs granted to the RSU holders in 2013. The existing RSU holders were granted an additional 92,245 RSUs to compensate the holders for the diminished value arising from the distribution of the Brake North America and Asia group and the April 2013 distribution to the Holdings’ shareholders.

In addition, during 2013, 14,124 new RSUs were granted to a new employee. The new employee received 7,062 RSUs based on the same performance conditions as the previously issued RSUs. The employee also received 7,062 time-based RSUs which will vest in four equal annual installments from the anniversary date of the employee’s commencement of employment, which was October of 2013.

During 2013, we had 142,861 RSUs either expire or forfeit. In relation to the closure of the corporate headquarters, in Ann Arbor, MI, several employees elected to forfeit 92,514 unvested RSUs in exchange for a payment equal to thirty percent of the anticipated value of such RSU holder’s RSUs upon the occurrence of a Cypress Scenario vesting event. It is anticipated that the severance payment will be made in 2014 for approximately $4 million, which will be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. In connection with the distribution of our Brake North America and Asia group to the shareholders of Holdings, our Board of Directors determined that the distribution would constitute a “Qualifying Termination” under each of the RSU agreements held by employees of the Brake North America and Asia group. Each of these RSU agreements expired on November 30, 2013, and the RSUs were forfeited with the exception of one employee, whose RSU agreement expires on November 30, 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, 205,508 RSUs had been awarded and remained outstanding, none of which have vested. We estimated the fair value of our performance based RSUs under a market-based Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of the recent modifications. Our weighted-average Monte Carlo fair value assumptions include:

   Cypress Scenario   IPO Scenario 

Effective term

   0.44 years     0.04 years  

Fair value of an RSU

  $135.49    $141.86  

Expected expense (Dollars in millions)

  $27    $28  

We estimate that the fair value of our time based RSUs using a market-based Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of the grant is approximately $1 million.

In the event that either of the performance-based conditions (Cypress Scenario or IPO Scenario) are met, the fair value of the RSUs will be recognized in stock-based compensation expense either 1) pro rata over the requisite service term including a cumulative catch-up related to service provided through the date the performance condition is met or 2) in full once the respective market-based condition is met or 3) in full if the requisite service period has already passed when the performance condition is met. Stock-based compensation expense, which would be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits was not recorded for 2013 as neither of the performance conditions have been met. If the performance condition is met on the 205,508 RSUs the amount of expense we would have to record is $17 million under the Cypress scenario or $18 million under the IPO scenario and the distributed Brake North America and Asia company would record expense related to the 70,621 RSUs granted to its employee.

RSUs

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

239,000

Issued per Option Exchange

4,000

Granted

3,000

Forfeited/expired

(4,000)

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

242,000

Granted

—  

Forfeited/expired

—  

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

242,000

Granted

106,369

Forfeited/expired

(142,861

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

205,508

Deferred Compensation Plan

We started a deferred compensation plan in 2008 that permits executives to defer receipt of all or a portion of the amounts payable under our non-equity incentive compensation plan. All amounts deferred are treated solely for purposes of the plan to have been notionally invested in the common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. As such, the accounts under the plan will reflect investment gains and losses associated with an investment in the Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. We match 25% of the deferral with an additional notional investment in common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc., which is subject to vesting as provided in the plan. Deferred compensation expense, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits were $2 million for 2011, $1 million for 2012 and $2 million for 2013.

Note 12. Income Tax

The components of the income tax provision (benefit) from continuing operations are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
   Year Ended
December 31,
2012
   Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Current:

      

U.S. federal

  $—      $—      $—    

U.S. state and local

   1     —       —    

Non-United States

   17     19     24  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   18     19     24  

Deferred:

      

U.S. federal & state

   7     26     (8

Non-United States

   3     —       6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred

   10     26     (2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax provision

  $28    $45    $22  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The income tax provision was calculated based upon the following components of income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax, and noncontrolling interest:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

United States

  $(38 $(27  (75

Non-United States

   87    86    104  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

  $49   $59   $29  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following:

(Dollars in millions)  At December 31,
2012
  At December 31,
2013
 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Net operating and other loss carryforwards

  $139   $130  

Inventory reserves

   10    8  

Expense accruals

   14    41  

Other

   3    7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   166    186  

Valuation allowance

   (22  (31
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets

   144    155  

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Depreciation & amortization

   2    11  

Foreign earnings

   25    23  

Other liabilities

   —      4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

   27    38  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $117   $117  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Presentation:

   

Current deferred taxes

  $13   $39  

Deferred income taxes

   106    80  

Deferred employee benefits & other noncurrent liabilities

   (2  (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $117   $117  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets whenever the realization of the assets is not deemed to meet a more likely than not standard. Accordingly, valuation allowances have been provided for net operating losses and other loss carryforwards in certain non-U.S. countries and U.S. states. In addition there are valuation allowances provided on certain U.S. credit carryforwards. U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes have not been recognized on the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. This amount becomes taxable upon a repatriation of assets from the subsidiary or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiary. The amount of such temporary differences totaled $72 million at December 31, 2013. Determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred income tax liability on this temporary difference is not practicable.

The effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal income tax rate for the following reasons:

   Year Ended
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2012
  Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

U.S. federal income tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

Increases (reductions) resulting from:

    

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

   -3.3    1.1    -5.5  

Valuation allowance

   5.5    -1.0    6.2  

Non-U.S. income

   -18.8    -14.3    -40.8  

U.S. Permanent Differences(1)

   23.9    45.0    66.7  

Unrecognized Tax Benefits(2)

   —      —      23.6  

Unremitted Earnings

   15.2    11.5    -8.3  

Miscellaneous items

   0.0    -0.8    0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   57.5  76.5  76.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The U.S. Permanent Differences affecting the tax rate were primarily the result of deemed distributions from foreign subsidiaries.
(2)The 2013 tax rate was negatively impacted by the recognition of an uncertain tax position resulting from an unfavorable ruling impacting our international operations.

At the end of 2013, federal domestic net operating loss carryforwards were $301 million. Of these, $12 million expire in 2024, $13 million expire in 2025, $37 million expire in 2026, $35 million expire in 2027, $76 million expire in 2028, $62 million expire in 2029, $33 million expire in 2030, $21 million expire in 2031, $11 million expire in 2032 and $1 million expire in 2033. At the end of 2013, state domestic net operating loss carryforwards were estimated to be $205 million, the majority of which expire between 2023 and 2033. At the end of 2013, foreign net operating loss carryforwards were $15 million and expire as follows: $2 million in 2014, $2 million in 2015, $4 million in 2016, $4 million in 2017 and $3 million in 2018. Realization of the tax benefits associated with loss carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:

(Dollars in millions)    

Balance at January 1, 2011

  $2  

Increases to tax positions

   —    

Decreases to tax positions

   —    
  

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2012

  $2  

Increases to tax positions

   —    

Decreases to tax positions

   (1)
  

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2013

  $1  

Increases to tax positions

   7 

Decreases to tax positions

   —    
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $8 
  

 

 

 

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013, is $8 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties as part of the income tax provision. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s accrual for interest and penalties is $1 million, and the Company’s accrual for income tax expense is $8 million. The increase in 2013 is attributable to a recent ruling impacting our international operations.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. For jurisdictions in which the Company transacts significant business, tax years ending December 31, 2004 and later remain subject to examination by tax authorities. We do not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next twelve months.

Note 13. Stock Incentive Plan

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our 2005 Stock Plan. The 2005 Stock Plan permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to employees, directors or consultants of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and its affiliates. A maximum of 350,000 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock may be subject to awards under the 2005 Stock Plan. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2005 Stock Plan (or pursuant to outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment on account of mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock dividends and other dilutive changes in the common stock. Shares of common stock covered by awards that terminate or lapse and shares delivered by a participant or withheld to pay the minimum statutory withholding rate, in each case, will again be available for grant under the 2005 Stock Plan.

Administration. The 2005 Stock Plan is administered by the compensation committee of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors. The committee has full power and authority to make, and establish the terms and conditions of any award, and to waive any such terms and conditions at any time (including, without limitation, accelerating or waiving any vesting conditions or payment dates). The committee is authorized to interpret the plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the plan and to make any other determinations that it, in good faith, deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the plan and may delegate such authority as it deems appropriate. The committee may correct any defect or supply an omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the plan in the manner and to the extent the committee deems necessary or desirable and any decision of the committee in the interpretation and administration of the plan shall lie within its sole and absolute good faith discretion and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned.

Options. The committee determines the option price for each option; however, the stock options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. An option holder may exercise an option by written notice and payment of the option price (i) in cash or its equivalent, (ii) by the surrender of a number of shares of common stock already owned by the option holder for at least six months (or such other period established by the committee) with a fair market value equal to the exercise price, (iii) if there is a public market for the shares, subject to rules established by the committee, through the delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell shares obtained upon the exercise of the option and to deliver to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. an amount out of the proceeds of the sale equal to the aggregate option price for the shares being purchased or (iv) by another method approved by the committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The committee may grant stock appreciation rights independent of or in connection with an option. The exercise price per share of a stock appreciation right shall be an amount determined by the committee. Generally, each stock appreciation right shall entitle a participant upon exercise to an amount equal to (i) the excess of (1) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share of common stock over (2) the exercise price, multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of common stock covered by the stock appreciation right. Payment shall be made in common stock or in cash, or partly in common stock and partly in cash, all as shall be determined by the committee.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The committee may grant awards of restricted stock units, rights to purchase stock, restricted stock and other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on the fair market value of, shares of common stock. The other stock-based awards will be subject to the terms and conditions established by the committee.

Transferability. Unless otherwise determined by the committee, awards granted under the 2005 Stock Plan are not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Change of Control. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the 2005 Stock Plan), the committee may provide for (i) the termination of an award upon the consummation of the change of control, but only if the award has vested and been paid out or the participant has been permitted to exercise an option in full for a period of not less than 30 days prior to the change of control, (ii) the acceleration of all or any portion of an award, (iii) payment in exchange for the cancellation of an award and/or (iv) the issuance of substitute awards that would substantially preserve the terms of any awards.

Amendment and Termination.Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors may amend, alter or discontinue the 2005 Stock Plan in any respect at any time, but no amendment may diminish any of the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.

Management Stockholders Agreement. All shares issued under the plan will be subject to a management stockholders agreement or a director stockholders agreement, as applicable.

Restrictive Covenant Agreement. Unless otherwise determined by Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s Board of Directors, all award recipients will be obligated to sign the standard Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Proprietary Information Agreement which includes restrictive covenants regarding confidentiality, proprietary information and a one year period restricting competition and solicitation of our clients, customers or employees. In the event a participant breaches these restrictive covenants, any exercise of, or payment or delivery pursuant to, an award may be rescinded by the committee in its discretion in which event the participant may be required to pay to us the amount of any gain realized in connection with, or as a result of, the rescinded exercise, payment or delivery.

Amendment. On November 14, 2006, the Compensation Committee of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. revised the vesting terms applicable to options previously awarded by the Committee to its named executive officers, as well as all other employees, under the Plan. One-half of these options vest in equal portions at the end of each year beginning with the year of the grant and ending December 31, 2009 (the “Vesting Period”), 40% are eligible for vesting in equal portions upon the Company’s achievement of certain specified annual EBITDA performance targets over the Vesting Period and 10% are eligible for vesting in equal portions upon the Company’s achievement of certain net working capital performance targets over the Vesting Period. The Committee has not modified the time-vesting options or the working capital performance options. The Committee elected to modify the vesting terms for the EBITDA performance options so that these options were eligible for vesting in equal portions at the end of each of the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. The Committee also modified the performance targets for those years. The fair value of the modified award was slightly higher than the grant date fair value.

2005 Stock Plan

On July 20, 2005, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. adopted the 2005 Stock Plan with a maximum of 227,000 shares of common stock subject to awards. On August 25, 2010, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. increased the number of shares of common stock subject to awards from 227,000 to 300,000, and Affinia Group Holdings Inc. commenced an offer to certain eligible holders of stock options to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock for RSUs with new vesting terms (the “Option Exchange”). The RSUs granted in connection with the Option Exchange are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and the new Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. On December 2, 2010, Affinia Group Holdings Inc. increased the number of shares of common stock subject to awards from 300,000 to 350,000.

A table of the 2005 Stock Plan balances for the restricted stock units, stock options, deferred compensation shares and stock awards is summarized below.

   At December 31, 
   2009   2010 

Restricted stock units*

   —       239,000  

Stock options*

   175,638     34,062  

Deferred compensation shares

   7,153     19,967  

Stock award

   —       163  

Shares available

   44,209     56,808  
          

Number of shares of common stock subject to awards

   227,000     350,000  
          

*The Option election period commenced on August 25, 2010 and expired on September 24, 2010. The completion of the Option Exchange for the RSUs occurred on October 18, 2010 and 100% of the eligible option holders elected to participate. A total of 24 eligible employees and directors participated in the Option Exchange. In addition, three eligible employees and directors who did not have vested options received RSUs. Affinia Group Holdings Inc. accepted for exchange options to purchase a total of 61,868 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock. All surrendered options were cancelled in exchange for RSUs. The options had been fully expensed by the exchange date. The total RSUs issued on October 18, 2010 and December 1, 2010 covered 235,000 and 4,000 shares, respectively, of Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock.

Stock Options

The option holders who were not eligible for the Option Exchange had 34,062 stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2010, which included vested options of 34,062 and no unvested options. Pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan, each option expires August 1, 2015. The exercise price is $100 per option.

We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes model to measure stock-based compensation expense at the date of grant. Dividend yields were not a factor because there were no cash dividends declared during 2008, 2009, and 2010. Our weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value assumptions include:

   2008  2009  2010 

Weighted-average effective term

   5.2 years    5.2 years    5.2 years  

Weighted-average risk free interest rate

   4.35  4.33  4.38

Weighted-average expected volatility

   40.1  40.8  40.4

Weighted-average fair value of options

    

(Dollars in millions)

  $7   $7   $1  

The fair value of the stock option grants is amortized to expense over the vesting period. The Company reduces the overall compensation expense by a turnover rate consistent with historical trends. Stock-based compensation expense, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits were less than $1 million for 2008, $1 million for 2009 and less than $1million for 2010.

Options

Outstanding at January 1, 2008

217,510

Granted

9,500

Forfeited/expired

(45,225

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

181,785

Granted

1,500

Forfeited/expired

(7,647

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

175,638

Granted

2,000

Exercised

(1,000

Exchanged

(61,868

Forfeited/expired

(80,708

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

34,062

Restricted Stock Units

The RSUs granted in connection with the Option Exchange are governed by the 2005 Stock Plan and a new Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.

The RSUs are subject to performance-based and market-based vesting restrictions, which differ from the performance and time-based vesting restrictions applicable to the exchanged stock options. The RSUs will vest if (i) the RSU holder remains employed with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. on the date that either of the following vesting conditions occurs and (ii) either of the following vesting conditions occurs on or prior to the date on which Cypress ceases to hold any remaining Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock:

Cypress Scenario - Cypress has received aggregate transaction proceeds in cash or marketable securities (not subject to escrow, lock-up, trading restrictions or claw-back) with respect to the disposition of more than 50% of its common equity interests in Affinia Group Holdings Inc. in an amount that represents a per-share equivalent value that is greater than or equal to two times the average per share price paid by Cypress for its aggregate common equity investment in Affinia Group Holdings Inc.; or

IPO Scenario - Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s common stock trades on a public stock exchange at an average closing price of $225 (as adjusted for stock splits) over a 60 consecutive trading day period.

As part of the Option Exchange, the total RSUs granted on October 18, 2010 covered 235,000 shares of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock. As of December 31, 2010, 239,000 shares had been awarded, none of which have vested. We estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock units using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant. Our weighted-average Monte Carlo fair value assumptions include:

   Cypress Scenario  IPO Scenario 

Effective term

   0.6 years    1.4 years  

Risk free interest rate

   1.1  1.1

Expected volatility

   70  70

Fair value of an RSU

  $107.72   $124.25  

Expected expense (Dollars in millions)

  $26   $30  

In the event that either of the performance-based conditions (Cypress Scenario or IPO Scenario) are met, the fair value of the RSUs will be recognized in stock-based compensation expense either 1) pro rata over the requisite service term including a cumulative catch-up related to service provided through the date the performance condition is met or 2) in full once the respective market-based condition is met or 3) in full if the requisite service period has already passed when the performance condition is met. Stock-based compensation expense, which would be recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, and tax related income tax benefits was not recorded for 2010 as neither of the performance conditions have been met. If the RSUs do not vest prior to ten years from the date of grant then the RSUs will expire. If the performance condition is met on the 239,000 RSUs the amount of expense we would have to record is $30 million under the IPO scenario or $26 million under the Cypress scenario.

RSUs

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

—  

Issued per Option Exchange

235,000

Granted

4,000

Forfeited/expired

—  

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

239,000

Note 14. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company provides defined contribution and defined benefit, qualified and nonqualified, pension plans for certain employees.

Under the terms of the defined contribution retirement plans, employee and employer contributions may be directed into a number of diverse investments. Expenses related to these defined contribution plans were $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The Company has Canadian defined benefit pension plans (the assets of which are referred to as the “Fund”). These plans are managed in accordance with applicable legal requirements relating to the investment of registered pension plans. The responsibility for the investment of the Fund lies with the Investment Committee of ITT Industries of Canada Ltd. (the “Committee”). The Committee is composed of representatives of ITT and of the participating companies, which includes our Company. The investments objectives of the plans are to maximize long-term total investment returns while assuming a prudent level of risk deemed appropriate by the Committee. The Fund may not engage in certain investments that are not permitted for a pension plan pursuant to applicable provincial pension benefits legislation and the Income Tax Act of Canada. Additionally, the Fund may not invest more than 10% of the assets in any single public issue of securities except where the security is issued by or guaranteed by the government of Canada or a Canadian province. This investment policy permits plan assets to be invested in a number of diverse investment categories such as demand or term deposits, short term notes, treasury bills, bankers acceptances, commercial paper, investment certificates issued by banks, insurance companies or trust companies, bonds and non-convertible debentures, mortgages and other asset-backed securities, convertible debentures, real estate, preferred and common stocks that are traded publicly, including both Canadian and foreign stocks, resource properties, venture capital, insured contracts, pooled funds, segregated funds, trusts, closed-end investment companies, limited partnerships and other structured vehicles invested directly or indirectly in, or in interests.

We did not terminate any plans in 2010; however, we settled $20 million of the assets in the pension plans. During the year we purchased annuities for many of the participants of the pension plans. We are in the process of winding down the plans. How quickly we settle all of the pension plan assets is subject to approval from a Canadian regulatory agency. The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the Company’s defined benefit pension plans’ and the fair value of assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, as well as the statements of the funded status and schedules of the net amounts recognized in the balance sheet at December 31, 2009 and 2010. The measurement date for the amounts in these tables was December 31 of each year presented:

   Pension Benefits 
   Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
(Dollars in millions)   

Reconciliation of benefit obligation

   

Obligation at beginning of period

  $18   $22  

Service cost

   —      —    

Interest cost

   1    1  

Plan amendment

   —      —    

Actuarial (gain) loss

   1    1  

Benefit payments

   (1  (1

Settlement

   —      (20

Translation adjustments

   3    —    
         

Obligation at end of period

  $22   $3  
         

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $22   $3  
         

   Pension Benefits 
(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets

   

Fair value, beginning of period

  $13   $20  

Actual return on plan assets

   3    1  

Employer contributions

   3    2  

Benefit payments

   (1  (2

Settlement

   —      (20

Translation adjustments

   2    1  
         

Fair value, end of period

  $20   $2  
         
    Pension Benefits 
(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Funded Status

  $(2 $(1

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

   4    1  
         

Accrued benefit cost

  $2   $—    
         

The weighted average asset allocations of the pension plans at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

   December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2010
 

Asset Category

   

Equity securities

   61  68

Controlled-risk debt securities

   38  28

Cash and short-term obligations

   1  4
         

Total

   100  100
         

The target asset allocations of the pension plans for equity securities, controlled-risk debt securities, absolute return strategies investments and cash and other assets at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 were 70%, 30%, 0% and 0%.

The following table presents the funded status of the Company’s pension plans and the amounts recognized in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and 2010:

(Dollars in millions)  December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2010
 

Accumulated benefit obligation at beginning of period

  $18   $22  

Projected benefit obligation

   22    3  

Fair value of assets

   20    2  
         

Accrued cost

  $(2 $(1
         

Amounts recognized in balance sheet:

   

Accrued benefit liability

  $(2 $(1

Intangible asset

   —      —    

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   4    1  
         

Net amount recognized

  $2   $—    
         

The Company’s projected benefit payments by the pension plans subsequent to December 31, 2010 are expected to be $2 million in 2011 and $1 million over the next nine years.

Projected contributions to be made to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans are expected to be in aggregate $1 million over the next ten years.

Components of net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2008, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

   Pension Benefits 
   Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
(Dollars in millions)    

Service cost

  $—     $—     $—    

Interest cost

   1    1    1  

Settlement

   —      —      4  

Expected return on plan assets

   (1  (1  (1

Amortization of transition obligation

   —      —      —    

Amortization of prior service cost

   —      —      —    

Recognized net actuarial loss

   2    2    1  
             

Net periodic benefit cost

  $2   $2   $5  
             

   December 31,
2008
  December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2010
 

Discount rate

   5.3  5.1  5.5

Expected return on plan assets

   6.1  6.1  6.6

The discount rate and expected return on plan assets for the Company’s plans presented in the tables above are used to determine pension expense for the succeeding year.

Fair Value Measurements.The following tables present our plan assets using the fair value framework as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. The fair value framework requires the categorization of our plan assets into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the plan assets. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents our plan assets using the fair value framework as of December 31, 2010.

(Dollars in millions)

  Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 
        

Cash and cash equivalents

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—      $—      $—      $—    

Equity securities:

        

Canadian equities

   1     —       —       1  

Other equities

   —       —       —       —    

Fixed income securities

        

Canadian Government Securities

   —       1     —       1  

Corporate bonds

   —       —       —       —    
                    

Total plan assets

  $1    $1    $—      $2  
                    

The following table presents our plan assets using the fair value framework as of December 31, 2009.

(Dollars in millions)

  Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 
        

Cash and cash equivalents

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—      $—      $—      $—    

Equity Securities:

        

Canadian equities

   8     1     —       9  

Other equities

   2     2     —       4  

Fixed income securities

        

Canadian Government Securities

   —       1     —       1  

Corporate bonds

   —       6     —       6  
                    

Total plan assets

  $10    $10    $—      $20  
                    

Note 15. Income Tax

The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
   Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Current:

     

U.S. federal

  $—     $—      $—    

U.S. state and local

   —      1     1  

Non-United States

   25    21     24  
              

Total current

   25    22     25  

Deferred:

     

U.S. federal & state

   (3  —       1  

Non-United States

   (4  —       1  
              

Total deferred

   (7  —       2  
              

Income tax provision

  $18   $22    $27  
              

The income tax provision was calculated based upon the following components of income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

United States

  $(38 $(39 $(45

Non-United States

   72    84    101  
             

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  $34   $45   $56  
             

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following:

(Dollars in millions)  At December  31,
2009
  At December  31,
2010
 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $96   $111  

Inventory reserves

   16    17  

Expense accruals

   34    29  

Other

   18    20  
         

Subtotal

   164    177  

Valuation allowance

   (23  (23
         

Deferred tax assets

   141    154  

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Depreciation & amortization

   20    21  

Foreign earnings

   1    7  
         

Deferred tax liabilities

   21    28  
         

Net deferred tax assets

  $120   $126  
         

Balance Sheet Presentation:

   

Current deferred taxes

  $50   $40  

Deferred income taxes

   68    85  

Other accrued expenses

   —      —    

Deferred employee benefits & other noncurrent liabilities

   2    1  
         

Net deferred tax assets

  $120   $126  
         

Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets whenever the realization of the assets is not deemed to meet a more likely than not standard. Accordingly, valuation allowances have been provided for net operating losses in certain non-U.S. countries and U.S. states. U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes have not been recognized on the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. This amount becomes taxable upon a repatriation of assets from the subsidiary or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiary. The amount of such temporary differences totaled $117 million at December 31, 2010. Determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred income tax liability on this temporary difference is not practicable.

The effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal income tax rate for the following reasons:

   Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

U.S. federal income tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

Increases (reductions) resulting from:

    

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

   -0.8    0.5    1.4  

Valuation allowance

    15.1    1.8  

Non-U.S. income

   -6.8    -23.4    -16.1  

U.S. Permanent Differences*

   11.1    9.9    22.2  

Unremitted Earnings

   8.8    5.8    4.2  

Miscellaneous items

   4.3    5.0    0.6  
             

Effective income tax rate

   51.6  47.9  49.1
             

*The U.S. Permanent Differences affecting the tax rate are a result of a deemed distribution and nondeductible expenses.

At the end of 2010, federal domestic net operating loss carryforwards were $266 million. Of these, $12 million expire in 2024, $13 million expire in 2025, $37 million expire in 2026, $35 million expire in 2027, $76 million expire in 2028, $62 million expire in 2029 and $31 million expire in 2030. At the end of 2010, state domestic net operating loss carryforwards were estimated to be $185 million, the majority of which expire between 2020 and 2030. At the end of 2010, foreign net operating loss carryforwards were $24 million and expire as follows: $1 million in 2012, $6 million in 2013, $3 million in 2014, $0.5 million in 2015, $2 million in 2016, $1 million in 2018, $3 million in 2019, $5 million in 2026, $0.5 million in 2029 and $2 million in 2030. Realization of the tax benefits associated with loss carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:

(Dollars in millions)

Balance at January 1, 2008

$      2

Increases to tax positions

      —  

Decreases to tax positions

      —  

Balance at January 1, 2009

$      2

Increases to tax positions

      —  

Decreases to tax positions

      —  

Balance at January 1, 2010

$      2

Increases to tax positions

      —  

Decreases to tax positions

      —  

Balance at December 31, 2010

$      2

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010, are $2 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties as part of the income tax provision. As of December 31, 2010 the Company’s accrual for interest and penalties is less than $1 million.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. For jurisdictions in which the Company transacts significant business, tax years ending December 31, 2004 and later remain subject to examination by tax authorities. We do not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next twelve months.

Note 16. Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table breaks out the property, plant and equipment in further detail:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2009 2010   2012 2013 

Property, plant and equipment

      

Land and improvements to land

  $25   $29    $8   $7  

Buildings and building fixtures

   80    80     55   54  

Machinery and equipment

   179    193     159   167  

Software

   26    28     21   17  

Other

   1    —    

Construction in progress

   12    31     9   16  
         

 

  

 

 
   323    361     252    261  

Less: Accumulated depreciation

   (124  (144   (133  (138
         

 

  

 

 
  $199   $217    $119   $123  
         

 

  

 

 

The property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2009 excludes our Commercial Distribution Europe segment property, plant and equipment, of $18 million, which was impaired. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over an asset’s estimated useful life. The depreciation expense from continuing operations was $25$15 million, $27$18 million, and $29$18 million for 2008, 2009,2011, 2012, and 2010,2013, respectively.

Note 14. Other Accrued Expenses

The following table breaks out the other accrued expenses in further detail:

   December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012   2013 

Taxes other than income taxes

  $11    $14  

Interest payable

   10     4  

Return reserve

   8     6  

Tax deposit payable

   5     9  

Accrued legal and professional fees

   4     16  

Accrued promotions and defective product

   4     1  

Accrued selling and marketing

   3     2  

Accrued freight

   3     2  

Accrued commissions expense

   3     2  

Accrued workers compensation

   2     1  

Accrued restructuring

   1     5  

Other

   14     16  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $68    $78  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The other accrued expenses primarily consist of accrued utilities and other miscellaneous accruals.

A reconciliation of the changes in our return reserves is as follows beginning with January 1, 2011:

   December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011(1)  2012(2)  2013(3) 

Beginning balance January 1

  $17   $11   $8  

Amounts charged to revenue

   45    23    19  

Returns processed

   (45  (26  (15

Classified to discontinued operations

   (6  —     (6
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance December 31

  $11   $8   $6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Includes our Brake North America and Asia group, which is classified as discontinued operations that had amounts charged to revenue of $22 million in 2011 and returns processed of $24 million in 2011. The return reserve as of December 31, 2010 includes $8 million in our Brake North America and Asia group, which is included in the total opening balance of $17 million. The return reserve as of December 31, 2011 excludes $6 million in our Brake North America and Asia group, which is classified in current liabilities of discontinued operations.
(2)Excludes our Brake North America and Asia group, which is classified as discontinued operations that had amounts charged to revenue of $15 million in 2012 and returns processed of $21 million in 2012. The return reserve as of December 31, 2011 excludes $6 million in our Brake North America and Asia group, which is classified in current liabilities of discontinued operations.
(3)Includes our Chassis group, which is classified as discontinued operations that had amounts charged to revenue of $9 million in 2013 and returns processed of $6 million in 2013. The return reserve as of December 31, 2013 excludes $6 million in our Chassis group, which is classified in current liabilities of discontinued operations.

Note 17. Other Accrued Expenses

The following table breaks out the other accrued expenses in further detail:

   December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2009   2010 

Return reserve

  $17    $17  

Accrued promotions and defective product

   10     10  

Core deposit liability

   9     9  

Taxes other than income taxes

   41     37  

Tax deposit payable

   14     9  

Interest payable

   12     11  

Accrued restructuring

   7     4  

Accrued workers compensation

   6     6  

Accrued freight

   4     11  

Other

   34     37  
          
  $154    $151  
          

The other accrued expenses primarily consist of accrued selling and marketing expenses, accrued utilities, accrued legal and professional fees and other miscellaneous accruals.

A reconciliation of the changes in our return reserves is as follows beginning with January 1, 2008:

   December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2008  2009  2010 

Beginning balance January 1

  $20   $18   $17  

Amounts charged to revenue

   58    56    43  

Returns processed

   (60  (57  (43
             

Ending balance December 31

  $18   $17   $17  
             

Note 18.15. Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2010,2013, the Company had purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment of approximately $13$8 million.

The Company had future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases in continuing operations of $66$50 million and $4 million in discontinued operations at December 31, 2010,2013, with future rental payments of:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Operating
Leases
 

2011

  $12  

2012

   13  

2013

   11  

2014

   10  

2015

   6  

Thereafter

   14  
     

Total

  $66  
     

(Dollars in millions)  Operating
Leases
 

2014

  $9  

2015

   8  

2016

   7  

2017

   7  

2018

   7  

Thereafter

   12  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $50  
  

 

 

 

The leases do not contain restrictions on future borrowings. There are no significant lease escalation clauses or purchase options. Rent expense from continuing operations was $20$9 million, $19$9 million and $18$10 million in 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010,2013, respectively.

Various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings are pending or threatened against us and our subsidiaries, arising from the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, intellectual property, product liability and environmental matters. We believe that the ultimate resolution of the foregoing matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations or liquidity.

On March 31, 2008,September 30, 2011, we entered into a class action lawsuit was filed by S&E Quick Lube Distributors,settlement agreement with Satisfied Brake Products Inc. of Utah(“Satisfied”) for $10 million to settle our claims against several auto parts manufacturersSatisfied for allegedly conspiring to fix prices for replacement oil, air, fuel and transmission filters. Several auto parts companies are named as defendants, including Champion Laboratories, Inc., Purolator Filters NA LLC, Honeywell International Inc., Cummins Filtration Inc., Donaldson Company, Baldwin Filters Inc., Bosch USA., Mann + Hummel USA Inc., ArvinMeritor Inc., United Components Inc. and Wix Filtration Corp LLC (“Wix Filtration”), onetheir theft of our subsidiaries. The lawsuittrade secrets. Upon execution of the settlement agreement, $2.5 million was due immediately and up to an additional $7.5 million is currently pendingto be provided after liquidation of Satisfied’s business. On September 30, 2011, we recorded a gain of $2.5 million in continuing operations in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we recorded $4 million as a consolidated Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) Proceedinggain in Chicago, IL because of multiple “tag-along” filings in several jurisdictions. Two suits have also been filedcontinuing operations in the Canadian provincesfirst quarter of Ontario and Quebec. Wix Filtration, along with other named defendants, have filed various motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaints, which were denied by the court in December 2009. Several defendants, including Wix Filtration, refiled motions to dismiss based upon plaintiff’s most recent amended complaint.2012. The court denied those motions in September 2010. Discoveryremaining claim against Satisfied was included in the action continues. Despitedistribution of the U.S. DepartmentBrake North America and Asia group to our shareholders.

On January 28, 2013, Walker Morris, counsel for Neovia notified us that Quinton Hazell Automotive Limited (“QHAL”) intended to appoint administrators (comparable to a bankruptcy filing in the United States) and that Neovia may pursue a claim against us for liabilities arising out of Justice closinga Logistics Services Agreement dated May 5, 2006 among Neovia, QHAL and Affinia Group Inc. (the “LSA”). In connection with our prior sale of QHAL and its investigationrelated companies to Klarius Group Ltd. (“KGL”), Affinia Group Inc. assigned the LSA to KGL, KGL agreed to indemnify Affinia Group Inc. against any liability under the LSA and the other companies in this matter, the StateQHAL group agreed to provide a guarantee to Affinia Group Inc. against these liabilities. KGL and QHAL have both appointed administrators. By letter dated February 15, 2013, Neovia, through its counsel Walker Morris, notified us that Neovia is asserting a claim against Affinia Group Inc. for liabilities arising under the LSA, including asserted unpaid invoices totaling 5.7 million pounds. On March 28, 2013, we were served with a demand for arbitration by Neovia. In the first quarter of Washington Attorney General issued Civil Investigative Demands to all defendants.2014, we settled the claim for approximately $11 million including legal expenses. We believe that Wix Filtration did not engage in any improper conduct and in any event did not have significant sales in this particular market at the relevant time periods so we do not expect the lawsuit to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results$10 million reserve recorded as of operations. We intend to vigorously defend this matter.

DPH Holdings Corp., a successor to Delphi Corporation and certain of its affiliates (“Delphi”), served Affinia and certain of our other subsidiaries with a complaint to avoid over $17 million in allegedly preferential transfers, substantially all of which relate to allegedly preferential transfers involving our non-U.S. subsidiaries. On February 4, 2011, we settled with DelphiDecember 31, 2013 for $0.1 million.Neovia.

The Company has various accruals for civil liability, including product liability, and other costs. If there is a range of equally probable outcomes, we accrue at the lower end of the range. The Company had $1 million and $2$13 million accrued as of December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2010,2013, respectively. In addition, we have various other claims that are not probablereasonably possible of occurrence that range from less than $1 million to $12 million.$10 million in the aggregate. There are no recoveries expected from third parties.

The Company has commenced a review of certain allegations that have arisen in connection with business operations involving our subsidiaries in Poland and Ukraine. The allegations raise issues involving potential improper payments in connection with governmental approvals, permits, or other regulatory areas and possible conflicts of interest. The review is being supervised by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and is being conducted with the assistance of outside professionals. The review is at an early stage and no determination can yet be made as to whether the Company, in connection with the circumstances surrounding the review, may become subject to any fines, penalties and/or other charges imposed by any governmental authority, or any other damages or costs that may arise in connection with those circumstances. The Company has voluntarily self-reported on these matters to the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and intends to fully cooperate with these agencies in their review.

During the first quarter of 2007 we signed a letter of credit in connection with a real estate lease. ASC 460,“Guarantees”, requires that this letter of credit be accounted for as a guarantee. The fair value of this guarantee as of December 31, 20102013 was less than $1 million and is included in other noncurrent liabilities and other long-term assets.

Note 16. Restructuring of Operations

The restructuring charges consist of employee termination costs, other exit costs and impairment costs. Severance costs are being accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” and ASC Topic 712, “Compensation—Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” The restructuring costs in 2011 and 2012 relate to our Chassis group, Brake North America and Asia Group and the corporate office. On October 15, 2013, we announced we will relocate our Ann Arbor, MI corporate headquarters to Gastonia, NC, which is the home of our Filtration segment. We recorded an accrual of over $4 million as of December 31, 2013 related to the relocation. The transition to the new corporate headquarters will occur in phases during 2014. The following summarizes the restructuring charges and activity for the Company:

Accrued Restructuring

(Dollars in millions)  Total 

Balance at December 31, 2011(1)

  $2  

Charges to expense:

  

Employee termination benefits

   1  

Asset write-offs expense

   —    

Other expenses

   1  
  

 

 

 

Total restructuring expenses

   2  

Cash payments and asset write-offs:

  

Cash payments

   (2

Asset retirements and other

   (1
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $1  

Charges to expense:

  

Employee termination benefits

   6  

Cash payments and asset write-offs:

  

Cash payments

   (2
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $5  
  

 

 

 

(1)The accrued restructuring as of December 31, 2011 excludes $1 million in our Brake North America and Asia group, which is classified in current liabilities of discontinued operations.

At December 31, 2013, no restructuring charges remained in accrued liabilities, relating to wage and healthcare continuation for severed employees and other termination costs. These remaining benefits were paid during 2013. The following table shows the restructuring expenses by reportable segment:

(Dollars in millions)  2011   2012   2013 

Affinia South America segment

  $—      $1    $—    

Corporate, eliminations and other

   —       —       6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total from continuing operations

  $—      $1    $6  

Discontinued Operations

   12     20     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $12    $21    $6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 19. Restructuring17. Related Party Transactions

On November 30, 2012, we distributed our Brake North America and Asia group to the shareholders of OperationsHoldings, the Company’s parent company and sole stockholder. The new organization is being led by the management team from the Company’s former Brake North America and Asia group, with oversight provided by a separate board of directors. On March 25, 2013, the new organization announced that it had been acquired by a group of investors.

In 2005, we announced two restructuring plans: (i)Affinia and BPI entered into a restructuring plan that we announced attransition services agreement (“TSA”) and a product distribution agreement effective with the beginning of 2005 as partdistribution on November 30, 2012. The TSA provides for certain administrative and other services and support to be provided by us to BPI and to be provided by BPI to us. Most of the Acquisition, also referredtransition services expired during 2013 but the distribution services under the product distribution agreement continued to be provided by BPI to our Chassis group. The TSAs and the distribution services were established as arm length transactions and are intended for the acquisition restructuring and (ii) a restructuring plan that we announced atcontracting parties to recover costs of the end of 2005, also referred to herein as the comprehensive restructuring. We have completed the acquisition restructuring and we are in process of completing the comprehensive restructuring.

Comprehensive Restructuring

The comprehensive restructuring was announced in December 2005 and has resultedservices. Additionally, BPI is temporarily providing distribution services for our chassis products. BPI charged us in the closuremonth of 36 facilities. Additionally, we previously announced the closure of our Litchfield, Illinois plant but the closure date has been delayed until 2011. Once this plant is closed in 2011 the comprehensive restructuring will be completed. We anticipate that we will incur over the next couple of years approximately $4December 2012 less than $1 million additional comprehensive restructuring costs related to the closure of the final facility and other costs related to closed facilities which we still own or lease. The major components of the comprehensive restructuring through 2010 were employee severance costs, asset impairment charges, and other costs (i.e. moving costs, environmental remediation, site clearance and repair costs) each of which we expect to represent approximately 41%, 18% and 41% respectively, of the total cost of the restructuring.

The comprehensive restructuring will result in approximately $171$9 million in restructuring costs, which exceeds preliminary expectations2013 for distribution services and transition services. Affinia charged BPI $2 million for transition services in the month of $152 million.

In connection with the comprehensive restructuring, we recorded $13December 2012 and $14 million in restructuring costs in 2010. The comprehensive and other restructuring costs are disclosed by period in the chart below and were recorded in selling, general and administrative expense, cost2013. As of sales and as part of discontinued operations.

Other Restructuring

At the end of 2009,December 31, 2012, we approved the closure of our distribution operations located in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. The operations closed at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The closure of this operation is part of the Company’s continuing effort to improve its distribution system and serve the replacement parts market effectively and efficiently. The charges were comprised of employee severance costshad accounts receivable of $1 million and other trailing liabilitiesaccounts payable of $4 million. We incurred approximately $4 million in 2010 and $1 million in 2009 related to the closureTSA. As of this facility. We anticipate another $2December 31, 2013, we have accounts receivable and accounts payable of less than $1 million in restructuring costs in 2011 related to the closure of the facility.

On May 3, 2010, we announced the closure of our brake manufacturing operations located in Maracay, Edo Aragua, Venezuela. The operations closed during the second quarter of 2010. These actions resulted in the Company incurring pre-tax charges of approximately $7 million, of which approximately $4 million were cash expenditures. The charges were comprised of employee severance costs of $3 million, asset impairments of $3 million, and other trailing liabilities of $1 million.

(Dollars in millions)

  Discontinued
Operations
   Selling, General
and
Administrative
Expenses
   Cost of Sales   Total 

Comprehensive Restructuring

        

2005

  $—      $2    $21    $23  

2006

   1     38     1     40  

2007

   12     23     3     38  

2008

   12     27     1     40  

2009

   2     10     1     13  

2010

   —       13     —       13  
                    

Total Comprehensive Cost

   27     113     27    $167  

Other Restructuring

        

2009

   —       1     —       1  

2010

   —       8     3     11  
                    

Total Other Restructuring Cost

   —       9     3     12  
                    

Total Restructuring Cost

  $27    $122    $30    $179  
                    

The restructuring charges for the comprehensive restructuring and further restructuring consist of employee termination costs, other exit costs and impairment costs. Severance costs are being accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” and ASC Topic 712, “Compensation—Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” The following summarizes the restructuring charges and activity for all the Company’s restructuring programs:

Accrued Restructuring

(Dollars in millions)  Comprehensive  Other  Total 

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $11    —     $11  

Charges to expense:

    

Employee termination benefits

   4    1    5  

Asset write-offs expense

   1    —      1  

Other expenses

   8    —      8  
             

Total restructuring expenses

   13    1    14  

Cash payments and asset write-offs:

    

Cash payments

   (15  —      (15

Asset retirements and other

   (3  —      (3
             

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $6    1   $7  

Charges to expense:

    

Employee termination benefits

   —      4    4  

Asset write-offs expense

   1    3    4  

Other expenses

   12    4    16  
             

Total restructuring expenses

   13    11    24  

Cash payments and asset write-offs:

    

Cash payments

   (13  (7  (20

Asset retirements and other

   (3  (4  (7
             

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $3    1   $4  
             

At December 31, 2010, $4 million of restructuring charges remained in accrued liabilities, relating to wage and healthcare continuation for severed employees and other termination costs. These remaining benefits are expected to be paid during 2011. The following table shows the restructuring expenses by segment:

(Dollars in millions)    2008       2009       2010   

On and Off-highway segment

  $19    $8    $13  

Brake South America segment

   7     1     7  

Corporate, eliminations and other

   2     3     4  
               
  $28    $12    $24  

Commercial Distribution Europe segment

   12     2     —    
               

Total

  $40    $14    $24  
               

Note 20. Related Party TransactionsTSA.

Mr. John M. Riess, an Affinia Group Inc.one of our Board member,members, is the parent of J. Michael Riess, who is currently employed with Genuine Parts Company (NAPA) as president of a distribution facility. NAPA is the Company’s largest customer as a percentage of total net sales from continuing operations. NAPA accounted for 27%22%, 29%23% and 27%22% of our total net sales from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010,2013, respectively.

In 2010, Mr. Zhang Haibo, 15% owner of Affinia Hong Kong Limited (“AHK”), loaned $1.4 million to AHK, a Brake North America and Asia group entity, to facilitate the establishment of a new subsidiary, Affinia Qingdao Braking Systems Co. Ltd., a new friction company in China with the intention of manufacturing friction products and distributing these products in Asia and North America. AHK owns 100% of the subsidiary. The contribution agreement hashad not been finalized as of December 31, 2010, but the cash hashad been received by AHK, as such we have recorded the $1.4 million as related party debt. In 2011, the contribution agreement had been finalized and the related party debt had been transferred to accumulated paid-in capital. This entity is no longer owned because it was distributed as part of the Brake North America and Asia group distribution in 2012.

In 2010, Mr. Zhang Haibo contributed $2.5 million to AHK to facilitate the purchase of land use rights for a new filtration company in China with the intention of manufacturing and distributing filtration products principally in Asia. The contribution did not change the ownership percentage and as a consequence the noncontrolling interest did not change but property, plant and equipment did increase.

The Company is controlled by affiliates In 2011, Mr. Zhang Haibo, 15% owner of Cypress. Cypress charged Affinia Group Inc. $3AHK, contributed $0.9 million for funding to Longkou Wix Filtration Co. Ltd., a new filtration company in 2009, which consistedChina with the intention of a management fee for services related tomanufacturing filtration products and distributing these products in Asia and North America. During the refinancing and other advisory services. This amount was includedthird quarter of 2012, we purchased the remaining 15% ownership interest in selling, general, and administrative expenses.Longkou Wix Filtration Co. Ltd.

Effective JanuaryJuly 1, 2011,2012, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., entered into an amendment to the Advisory Agreement with Torque Capital Group LLC for services related to corporate strategy, finance, investments and such other services as we may request from time to time. Mr. Joseph E. Parzick, one of our directors, is a managing partner of Torque Capital Group LLC. In connection with theThe Advisory Agreement we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., have agreedwas amended to change the expiration date of the obligation to pay athe quarterly fee of $400,000 for six calendar quarters expiringfrom June 30, 2012 and have further agreed to pay a success fee of up to $3.0 millionMarch 31, 2013. Subsequently, in accordance with the event Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s shareholders realize a specified return on their investment. A copyterms of the Advisory Agreement, is attachedthe Company terminated its obligation to pay the quarterly fee effective December 31, 2012. Additionally, Mr. Parzick resigned as an Exhibit hereto.a director effective May 31, 2013.

Effective January 1, 2011, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., entered into an Advisory Agreement with Cypress Advisors, Inc. for services related to corporate strategy, finance, investments and such other services as we may request from time to time. Mr. James A. Stern, one of our directors, is a managing director of Cypress Advisors, Inc. In connection with the Advisory Agreement, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., have agreed to paypaid a quarterly fee of $100,000 for six calendar quarters expiring June 30, 2012.

The general manager of our Poland operations receives his compensation through a third-party management company in Poland, which is owned by the general manager. The management company received $0.4 million and $0.5 million in 2012 and have further agreed2013 for services rendered by the general manager.

Jartom Company provides metal components, cardboard and other services to pay a success fee of up to $2.0our Poland operations. We purchased $2 million in the event Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s shareholders realize a specified return on their investment. A copyproduct and services from Jartom in 2012 and 2013. One of the Advisory Agreementpartners of Jartom Company is attachedthe brother to the general manager of the Poland operations.

Note 18. Segment Information

The Company’s operating segments are based on how the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) makes decisions about assessing performance and allocating resources. As such, the CODM receives discrete financial information for the Company’s three operating segments. However, as an Exhibit hereto.of December 31, 2013 the Chassis group was classified into current assets of discontinued operations. Consequently, as of December 31, 2013, we have two operating segments that are included in continuing operations. The Brake North America and Asia group was classified into discontinued operations in 2011. Our Chassis group and Brake North America and Asia group were classified as discontinued operations and, as such, is not presented in the net sales and operating profit segment tables below. See “Note. 3 Discontinued Operations—Chassis.” and “Note 4. Discontinued Operation—Brake.” With the Chassis group being classified into discontinued operations management determined that the Filtration and Affinia South America segments should be segregated into separate segments rather than being aggregated into the On and Off-Highway segment as they had in previous years. Management believes that this presentation provides more meaningful information about this business based on the current composition. Accordingly, all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based primarily on revenue growth and operating profit. Segment net sales, operating profit, total assets, depreciation and amortization and capital expenditures are disclosed below. The allocation of income taxes is not evaluated at the segment level. Amounts associated with the aforementioned discontinued operations are excluded from the amounts below.

(Dollars in millions)  Net Sales   Operating Profit 
  2011  2012  2013   2011  2012  2013 

Filtration segment

  $801   $831   $902    $105   $122   $132  

Affinia South America segment

   469    430    459     34    32    36  

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (4  (2  —       (27  (34  (50
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $1,266   $1,259   $1,361    $112   $120   $118  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)  Total Assets 
  2012   2013 

Filtration segment

  $343    $405  

Affinia South America segment

   226     220  

Corporate, eliminations and other

   240     243  

Chassis group(1)

   151     —    

Assets of discontinued operations(1)

   —      141  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $960    $1,009  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The amounts related to the Chassis group are classified in the current assets of discontinued operations in 2013.

(Dollars in millions)  Depreciation and
Amortization
   Capital Expenditures 
  2011   2012   2013   2011   2012   2013 

Filtration segment

  $13    $14    $15    $22    $12    $22  

Affinia South America segment

   2     3     3     5     5     5  

Corporate, eliminations and other

   8     5     3     —      —      —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total from continuing operations

   23     22     21     27     17     27  

Discontinued operations

   16     2     1     28     10     4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $39    $24    $22    $55    $27    $31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales by geographic region were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2011
   Year Ended
December 31,
2012
   Year Ended
December 31,
2013
 

Brazil

  $438    $389    $411  

Canada

   45     47     47  

Poland

   147     146     161  

Other Countries

   93     122     164  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Other Countries

   723     704     783  

United States

   543     555     578  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,266    $1,259    $1,361  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  December 31,
2012
   December 31,
2013(1)
 

China

  $17    $18  

Brazil

   14     14  

Poland

   29     30  

Other Countries

   9     12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other countries

   69     74  

United States

   177     130  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $246    $204  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Long-lived assets as of December 31, 2013 exclude $52 million in our Chassis group, which is classified in current assets of discontinued operations.

Net sales by geographic area were determined based on origin of sale. Geographic data on long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, other intangible assets and deferred financing costs.

Note 21. Segment Information19. Venezuelan Operations

As required by U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2010, we accounted for Venezuela as a highly inflationary economy because the three-year cumulative inflation rate for Venezuela using the blended Consumer Price Index (which is associated with the city of Caracas) and the National Consumer Price Index (developed commencing in 2008 and covering the entire country of Venezuela) exceeded 100%.

Effective January 1, 2010, our Venezuelan subsidiary uses the U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. The products, customer base, distribution channel, manufacturing process, procurementfinancial statements of our subsidiary must be re-measured into the Company’s reporting currency (U.S. Dollar) and future exchange gains and losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities are similar throughout allreflected in current earnings, rather than exclusively in the equity section of the Company’s operations. However, duebalance sheet, until such time as the economy is no longer considered highly inflationary. The local currency in Venezuela is the Bolivar Fuerte (“VEF”).

Effective January 1, 2010, we changed the rate used to different economic characteristics inre-measure our Venezuelan subsidiary’s transactions and balances from the Company’s operations and in conformity with ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting,” the Company was previously presented as three separate reporting segments: (1) the On and Off-highway segment, which is composedofficial exchange rate of Filtration, Brake North America and Asia, Chassis and Commercial Distribution South America, (2) Brake South America segment and (3) Commercial Distribution Europe segment. All three segments are in the On and Off-highway industry but for segment reporting purposes we refer2.15 VEF to the first segment asU.S. Dollar to the parallel market rate, which ranged between 5.30 and 7.70 VEF to the U.S. Dollar during 2010. The one-time devaluation had a $2 million negative impact on our pre-tax net income. As described above, during the second quarter of 2010, we changed the rate used to re-measure our Venezuelan subsidiary’s transactions to the SITME rate of 5.30 VEF to the U.S. Dollar and the rate remained at that level in 2011.

On and Off-highway segment. BecauseFebruary 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government announced another devaluation of the salecurrency to 6.30 VEF per U.S. Dollar and it eliminated the parallel market rate. The devaluation had a $3 million negative impact on our pre-tax net income.

For 2011, our Venezuelan subsidiary represented approximately 2% of our Commercial Distribution Europe segment, the Commercial Distribution Europe segment was classified as discontinued operations and, as such is not presented in theconsolidated net sales and operating profit segment tables below. See “Note 4. Discontinued Operation.” Segmentit had a net income attributable to the Company of $3 million. For 2012, our Venezuelan subsidiary represented approximately 3% of our consolidated net sales operating profit, total assets, depreciation and amortization and capital expenditures were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Net Sales  Operating Profit 
  2008  2009  2010  2008  2009  2010 

On and Off-highway segment

  $1,908   $1,792   $1,991   $141   $153   $167  

Brake South America segment

   26    22    15    (11  (3  (8

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (19  (17  (15  (37  (49  (39
                         
  $1,915   $1,797   $1,991   $93   $101   $120  
                         

(Dollars in millions)  Total Assets 
  2009   2010 

On and Off-highway segment

  $1,318    $1,417  

Brake South America segment

   8     —    

Corporate, eliminations and other

   102     172  

Assets of discontinued operations

   55     —    
          
  $1,483    $1,589  
          

(Dollars in millions)  Depreciation and
Amortization
   Capital Expenditures 
    2008       2009       2010       2008       2009       2010   

On and Off-highway segment

  $22    $24    $27    $20    $27    $50  

Brake South America segment

   1     1     —       1     1     —    

Corporate, eliminations and other

   11     11     10     2     —       2 
                              

Total from continuing operations

   34     36     37     23     28     52  

Discontinued operations

   2     2     —       2     3     —    
                              
  $36    $38    $37    $25    $31    $52  
                              

Net sales by geographic region were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
   Year Ended
December 31,
2009
   Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Brazil

  $356    $321    $414  

Canada

   143     145     142  

Poland

   109     118     140  

Other Countries

   167     139     143  
               

Total Other Countries

   775     723     839  

United States

   1,140     1,074     1,152  
               
  $1,915    $1,797    $1,991  
               

Long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  December 31,
2009
   December 31,
2010
 

Canada

  $11    $15  

China

   71     76  

Brazil

   10     13  

Other Countries

   51     66  
          

Total other countries

   143     170  

United States

   272     285  
          
  $415    $455  
          

Net sales by geographic area were determined based on origin of sale. Geographic data on long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, other intangible assets and deferred financing costs.

We offer primarily three types of products: brake products, which include brake drums, rotors, pads and shoes and hydraulic brake system components; filtration products, which include oil, fuel, air and other filters; and chassis products, which include steering, suspension and driveline components. Additionally, we have Commercial Distribution South America products, which offer brake, chassis, filtration and other products. The Company’s sales by group of similar products are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Brake products

  $684   $615   $648  

Filtration products

   727    713    759  

Chassis products

   155    153    169  

Commercial Distribution South America products

   368    333    430  

Corporate, eliminations and other

   (19  (17  (15
             
  $1,915   $1,797   $1,991  
             

Note 22. Asset Retirement Obligations

We account for the fair value of an ARO in the period in which it is incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, with the offsetting associated asset retirement costs capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets. The asset retirement cost is subsequently allocated to expense usinghad a systematic and rational method over its useful life. Changes in the ARO resulting from the passage of time are recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as accretion expense, which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Changes resulting from revisionsnet income attributable to the timing or amountCompany of the original estimate of cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease in the asset retirement cost and ARO. The ARO recorded at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 was $2 million.

Note 23. Derivatives

The Company’s financial derivative assets and liabilities consist of standard currency forward contracts. The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

All derivative instruments are recognized on our balance sheet at fair value. The fair value measurements of our currency derivatives are based upon Level 2 inputs consisting of observable market data pertaining to relevant currency exchange rates, as reported by a recognized independent third-party financial information provider. Based upon the Company’s periodic assessment of our own creditworthiness, and of the counterparties to our derivative instruments’ fair value measurements are not adjusted for nonperformance risk.

Currency Rate Derivatives

Our currency derivative contracts are valued using then-current spot and forward market data as provided by external financial institutions. We enter into short-term hedging transactions with banking institutions of only the highest tiered credit ratings and thus the counterparty credit risk associated with these contracts is not considered significant.

Our currency derivatives are undesignated hedges of specific monetary asset balances subject to currency revaluation. Changes in the fair value of these hedging transactions are recognized in income each accounting period. At December 31, 2010, the aggregate notional amount of our currency derivatives was $121 million having a fair market value of $1 million in assets and less than $1 million in liabilities.

The Company’s outstanding currency forward contracts are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Other current assets” or “Other accrued expenses,” accordingly. Currency derivative gains and losses are recognized in “Other income, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the reporting period of occurrence. The Company has not recorded currency derivative gains (losses) to other comprehensive income (loss) nor has it reclassified prior period currency derivative results from other comprehensive income (loss) to earning during the last twelve months. The Company does not anticipate that it will record any currency derivative gains or losses to other comprehensive income (loss) or that it will reclassify prior period currency derivative results from other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings in the next twelve months.

The notional amount and fair valuemillion. For 2013, our Venezuelan subsidiary represented approximately 5% of our outstanding currency forward contracts wereconsolidated net sales and it had a net income attributable to the Company of $5 million. The Venezuelan subsidiary also had $15 million and $28 million of total assets and $12 million and $18 million of total liabilities as follows:of December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

(Dollars in millions)  Notional
Amount
   Asset
Derivative
   Liability
Derivative
 

As of December 31, 2010

  $121    $1   $—    

As of December 31, 2009

  $133    $—      $—    

Note 24.20. Financial Information for Guarantors and Non-Guarantors

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. (presented as Parent“Parent” in the following schedules), through its 100%-owned owned subsidiary, Affinia Group Inc. (presented as Issuer in the following schedules), issued the Secured$250 million of Senior Notes on August 13, 2009 in the principal amount of $225 million and Subordinated Notes on November 30, 2004 in the principal amount of $300 million with an additional $100 million in principal amount issued December 9, 2010.April 25, 2013. As of December 31, 20102013, there were $367 million and $200$250 million of SubordinatedSenior Notes and Secured Notes outstanding, respectively.outstanding. The notes were offered only to qualified institutional buyers and certain persons in offshore transactions.transactions

The SecuredSenior Notes are fully, irrevocably, unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior secured basis and the Subordinated Notes are fully, unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis. The SubordinatedSenior Notes are general obligations of Affinia Group Inc.the Issuer and guaranteed by the Parent and all of Affinia Group Inc.’s wholly owned current and future domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”). Affinia Group Inc.’s obligations under the Secured Notes are guaranteed by the Guarantors and are secured by first-priority liens, subject to permitted liens and exceptions for excluded assets, on substantially all of Affinia Group Inc.’s and the Guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets (excluding the ABL Collateral as defined below), including real property, fixtures and equipment owned or acquired in the future by Affinia Group Inc. and the Guarantors (the “Non-ABL Collateral”) and are secured by second-priority liens on all accounts receivable, inventory, cash, deposit accounts, securities accounts and proceeds of the foregoing and certain assets related thereto held by Affinia Group Inc. and the Guarantors, which constitute collateral under the ABL Revolver on a first-priority basis (the “ABL Collateral”).

Guarantors. The following information presents Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008,2011, December 31, 2009,2012 and December 31, 2010,2013, Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 20102013 and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008,2011, December 31, 2009,2012 and December 31, 2010 and2013 of (1) Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.,the Parent, (2) Affinia Group Inc.,the Issuer, (3) the Guarantors, (4) the Non-Guarantors, and (5) eliminations to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis. Other separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Parent and the Guarantors are not presented because management does not believe that such information is material to investors.

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 20082011

 

(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net sales

  $—     $—     $1,269   $941   $(295 $1,915  

Cost of sales

   —      —      (1,072  (769  295    (1,546
                         

Gross profit

   —      —      197    172    —      369  

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

   —      (29  (147  (100  —      (276
                         

Operating (loss) profit

   —      (29  50    72    —      93  

Other income (loss), net

   —      23    (25  (1  —      (3

Interest expense

   —      (55  —      (1  —      (56
                         

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   —      (61  25    70    —      34  

Income tax benefit (provision)

   —      5    —      (23  —      (18
                         

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   —      (56  25    47    —      16  

Equity in income, net of tax

   (3  53    28    —      (78  —    
                         

Net income from continuing operations

   (3  (3  53    47    (78  16  

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —      —      —      (19  —      (19
                         

Net (loss) income

   (3  (3  53    28    (78  (3

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      —      —      —      —      —    
                         

Net (loss) income attributable to the company

  $(3 $(3 $53   $28   $(78 $(3
                         
(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net sales

  $—    $—    $595   $997   $(326 $1,266  

Cost of sales

   —     —     (480  (825  326    (979
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   —     —     115    172    —     287  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   —     (26  (64  (85  —     (175
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) profit

   —     (26  51    87    —     112  

Other income (loss), net

   —     —     (3  7    —     4  

Interest expense

   —     (66  —     (1  —     (67
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   —     (92  48    93    —     49  

Income tax provision

   —     (11  8    (25  —     (28

Equity in income (loss), net of tax

   (73  30    55    —     (12  —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (73  (73  111    68    (12  21  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —     —     (80  (13  —     (93
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   (73  (73  31    55    (12  (72

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —     —     1    —     —     1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(73 $(73 $30   $55   $(12 $(73
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Guarantor Condensed

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor

Consolidating Statement of OperationsComprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Year Ended December 31, 20092011

 

(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net sales

  $—     $—     $1,181   $943   $(327 $1,797  

Cost of sales

   —      —      (987  (769  327    (1,429
                         

Gross profit

   —      —      194    174    —      368  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   —      (43  (132  (92  —      (267
                         

Operating (loss) profit

   —      (43  62    82    —      101  

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   —      8    —      —      —      8  

Other income (loss), net

   —      18    (16  3    —      5  

Interest expense

   —      (67  —      (2  —      (69
                         

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   —      (84  46    83    —      45  

Income tax provision

   —      (10  —      (12  —      (22

Equity in income, net of tax

   (44  54    11    1    (21  1  
                         

Net income from continuing operation

   (44  (40  57    72    (21  24  

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —      —      —      (61  —      (61
                         

Net (loss) income

  $(44 $(40 $57   $11   $(21 $(37

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      4    3    —      —      7  
                         

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(44 $(44 $54   $11   $(21 $(44
                         
(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor   Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net income (loss)

  $(73 $(73 $31    $55   $(12 $(72

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

        

Pension liability adjustment

   (1  (1  —      (1  2    (1

Change in foreign currency translation adjustments

   (32  (32  —      (32  64    (32
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (33  (33  —      (33  66    (33
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   (106  (106  31     22    54    (105

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —     —     1     —     —     1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(106 $(106 $30    $22   $54   $(106
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 20102012

 

(Dollars in millions)  Parent   Issuer Guarantor Non-
Guarantor
 Eliminations Consolidated
total
   Parent Issuer Guarantor Non-
Guarantor
 Eliminations Consolidated
total
 

Net sales

  $—      $—     $1,255   $1,078   $(342 $1,991    $—    $—    $609   $997   $(347 $1,259  

Cost of sales

   —       —      (1,059  (864  342    (1,581   —     —    (490 (824 347   (967
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   —       —      196    214    —      410     —     —     119    173    —     292  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   —       (32  (145  (113  —      (290   —     (45  (46  (81  —     (172
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating (loss) profit

   —       (32  51    101    —      120     —     (45  73    92    —     120  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —       (1  —      —      —      (1   —     (1  —     —     —     (1

Other income (loss), net

   —       17    (15  1    —      3     —     3    (4  4    —     3  

Interest expense

   —       (64  —      (2  —      (66   —     (62  —     (1  —     (63
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income and noncontrolling interest

   —       (80  36    100    —      56  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   —     (105  69    95    —     59  

Income tax provision

   —       (3  —      (24  —      (27   —     (21  2    (26  —     (45

Equity in income, net of tax

   24     109    77    1    (210  1  

Equity in income (loss), net of tax

   (103  23    653    1    (573  1  
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income from continuing operation

   24     26    113    77    (210  30  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —       —      —      —      —      —    

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (103  (103  724    70    (573  15  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —     —     (701  584    —     (117
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  $24    $26   $113   $77   $(210 $30  

Net income (loss)

   (103  (103  23    654    (573  (102

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —       2    4    —      —      6     —     —     —     1    —     1  
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to the Company

  $24    $24   $109   $77   $(210 $24  

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(103 $(103 $23   $653   $(573 $(103
                      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Guarantor Condensed

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor

Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor   Non-Guarantor  Eliminations  Consolidated
Total
 

Assets

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—      $9   $—      $56   $—     $65  

Restricted cash

   —       —      —       9    —      9  

Accounts receivable

   —       1    168     124    —      293  

Inventories

   —       —      256     174    —      430  

Other current assets

   —       51    4     66    —      121  

Current assets of discontinued operations

   —       —      —       55    —      55  
                           

Total current assets

   —       61    428     484    —      973  

Investments and other assets

   —       228    20     63    —      311  

Intercompany investments

   391     1,147    278     —      (1,816  —    

Intercompany receivables

   —       (366  497     (131  —      —    

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       5    91     103    —      199  
                           

Total assets

  $391    $1,075   $1,314    $519   $(1,816 $1,483  
                           

Liabilities and Equity

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $—      $15   $109    $77   $—     $201  

Notes payable

   —       —      —       12    —      12  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   —       11    5     11    —      27  

Other accrued liabilities

   —       22    53     79    —      154  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   —       —      —       43    —      43  
                           

Total current liabilities

   —       48    167     222    —      437  

Deferred employee benefits and noncurrent liabilities

   —       11    —       9    —      20  

Long-term debt

   —       579    —       10    —      589  
                           

Total liabilities

   —       638    167     241    —      1,046  

Total shareholder’s equity

   391     437    1,147     278    (1,816  437  
                           

Total liabilities and equity

  $391    $1,075   $1,314    $519   $(1,816 $1,483  
                           

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor

Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2010

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor   Non-Guarantor  Eliminations  Consolidated
Total
 

Assets

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—      $9   $3    $43   $—     $55  

Restricted cash

   —       —      —       12    —      12  

Accounts receivable

   —       —      177     139    —      316  

Inventories

   —       —      323     197    —      520  

Other current assets

   —       34    4     75    —      113  
                           

Total current assets

   —       43    507     466    —      1,016  

Investments and other assets

   —       254    38     64    —      356  

Intercompany investments

   436     1,209    345     —      (1,990  —    

Intercompany receivables

   —       (349  446     (97  —      —    

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       3    90     124    —      217  
                           

Total assets

  $436    $1,160   $1,426    $557   $(1,990 $1,589  
                           

Liabilities and Equity

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $—      $15   $149    $80   $—     $244  

Notes payable

   —       —      —       27    —      27  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   —       10    7     16    —      33  

Other accrued liabilities

   —       21    60     70    —      151  
                           

Total current liabilities

   —       46    216     193    —      455  

Deferred employee benefits and noncurrent liabilities

   —       8    —       9    —      17  

Long-term debt

   —       658    —       11    —      669  
                           

Total liabilities

   —       712    216     213    —      1,141  

Total shareholder’s equity

   436     448    1,210     344    (1,990  448  
                           

Total liabilities and equity

  $436    $1,160   $1,426    $557   $(1,990 $1,589  
                           

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor

Consolidating Statement of Cash FlowsComprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Year Ended December 31, 20082012

 

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-Guarantor  Elimination   Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

         

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   —       37    16    (5  —       48  

Investing activities

         

Proceeds from sale of assets

   —       —      —      1    —       1  

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   —       (50  —      —      —       (50

Proceeds from sale of affiliates

   —       3    —      3    —       6  

Investments in affiliates

   —       —      (6  —      —       (6

Change in restricted cash

   —       —      —      (1  —       (1

Additions to property, plant and equipment, net

   —       (1  (11  (13  —       (25

Other investing activities

   —       —      —      —      —       —    
                           

Net cash used in investing activities

   —       (48  (17  (10  —       (75

Financing activities

         

Short-term debt, net

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Proceeds from long-term debt

   —       —      —      1    —       1  

Payment of long-term debt

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Capital contribution

   —       50    —      —      —       50  

Net transactions with Parent

   —       —      —      —      —       —    
                           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations

   —       50    —      1    —       51  

Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations

   —       —      —      —      —       —    
                           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   —       50    —      1    —       51  

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —       —      —      (6  —       (6

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —       39    (1  (20  —       18  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   —       20    1    38    —       59  
                           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—      $59   $—     $18   $—      $77  
                           
(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor   Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net income (loss)

  $(103 $(103 $23    $654   $(573 $(102

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

        

Change in foreign currency translation adjustments

   (15  (15  —      (15  30    (15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (15  (15  —      (15  30    (15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   (118  (118  23     639    (543  (117

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —     —     —      1    —     1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $(118 $(118 $23    $638   $(543 $(118
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Cash FlowsOperations

For the Year Ended December 31, 20092013

 

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-Guarantor  Elimination   Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

         

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   —       (18  15    58    —       55  

Investing activities

         

Proceeds from sale of assets

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Proceeds from sale of affiliates

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Investments in affiliates

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Change in restricted cash

   —       —      —      (5  —       (5

Additions to property, plant and equipment, net

   —       —      (15  (16  —       (31
                           

Net cash used in investing activities

   —       —      (15  (21  —       (36

Financing activities

         

Short-term debt, net

   —       —      —      —      —       —    

Net decrease in debt of noncontrolling interest

   —       —      —      (3  —       (3

Payments on senior term loan facility

   —       (297  —      —      —       (297

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —       (22  —      —      —       (22

Proceeds from Secured Notes

   —       222    —      —      —       222  

Net proceeds from ABL Revolver

   —       90    —      —      —       90  

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —       (25  —      —      —       (25
                           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations

   —       (32  —      (3  —       (35

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —       —      —      4    —       4  

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —       (50  —      38    —       (12

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   —       59    —      18    —       77  
                           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—      $9   $—     $56   $—      $65  
                           
(Dollars in millions)  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net sales

  $—      $—     $628   $877   $(144 $1,361  

Cost of sales

   —       —      (506  (681  144    (1,043
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   —       —      122    196    —      318  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   —       (46  (63  (91  —      (200
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) profit

   —       (46  59    105    —      118  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   —       (15  —      —      —      (15

Other income (loss), net

   —       (2  1    —      —      (1

Interest expense

   —       (72  —      (1  —      (73
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision, equity in income, net of tax and noncontrolling interest

   —       (135  60    104    —      29  

Income tax provision

   —       2    —      (24  —      (22

Equity in income, net of tax

   10     143    64    (2  (217  (2
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   10     10    124    78    (217  5  

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   —       —      19    (14  —      5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   10     10    143    64    (217  10  

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —       —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the Company

  $10    $10   $143   $64   $(217 $10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Guarantor Condensed

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Supplemental Guarantor

Consolidating Statement of Cash FlowsComprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Year Ended December 31, 20102013

 

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-Guarantor  Elimination   Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

         

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   —       (57  75    5    —       23  

Investing activities

         

Proceeds from sales of assets

   —       —      —      1    —       1  

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   —       —      (51  —      —       (51

Proceeds from sale of affiliates

   —       11    —      —      —       11  

Change in restricted cash

   —       —      —      (3  —       (3

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   —       (2  (17  (33  —       (52

Other investing activities

   —       —      (4  —      —       (4
                           

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   —       9    (72  (35  —       (98

Financing activities

         

Net increase in other short-term debt

   —       —      —      13    —       13  

Proceeds from other debt

   —       —      —      2    —       2  

Proceeds from Subordinated Notes

   —       100    —      —      —       100  

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —       (23  —      —      —       (23

Capital contribution

   —       —      —      3    —       3  

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —       (5  —      —      —       (5

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —       (24  —      —      —       (24
                           

Net cash provided by financing activities

   —       48    —      18    —       66  

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —       —      —      (1  —       (1

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —       —      3    (13  —       (10

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   —       9    —      56    —       65  
                           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—      $9   $3   $43   $—      $55  
                           
(Dollars in millions)  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor   Non-
Guarantor
  Eliminations  Consolidated
total
 

Net income

  $10   $10   $143    $64   $(217 $10  

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

        

Pension liability adjustment

   1    1    —       1   (2  1  

Change in foreign currency translation adjustments

   (19  (19  —       (19  38    (19

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps

   9    9    —       —      (9  9  

Less: reclassification adjustments included in net income

   (2  (2  —       —      2    (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   (11  (11  —       (18  29    (11
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   (1  (1  143     46    (188  (1

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   —      —      —       —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to the Company

  $(1 $(1 $143    $46   $(188 $(1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
   Eliminations  Consolidated
Total
 

Assets

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—      $23   $—     $28    $—     $51  

Accounts receivable

   —       2    39    122     —      163  

Inventories

   —       —      172    132     —      304  

Other current assets

   —       15    9    41     —      65  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   —       40    220    323     —      583  

Investments and other assets

   —       197    41    20     —      258  

Intercompany investments

   150     724    652    —       (1,526  —    

Intercompany receivables (payables)

   —       (227  (134  361     —      —    

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       2    48    69     —      119  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $150    $736   $827   $773    $(1,526 $960  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $—      $11   $79   $53    $—     $143  

Notes payable

   —       —      —      23     —      23  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   —       7    3    7     —      17  

Other accrued liabilities

   —       15    21    32     —      68  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   —       33    103    115     —      251  

Deferred employee benefits and noncurrent liabilities

   —       6    —      6     —      12  

Long-term debt

   —       546    —      —       —      546  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   —       585    103    121     —      809  

Total shareholder’s equity

   150     151    724    652     (1,526  151  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $150    $736   $827   $773    $(1,526 $960  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2013

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor   Non-
Guarantor
   Eliminations  Consolidated
Total
 

Assets

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $—     $68   $—      $33    $—     $101  

Accounts receivable

   —      —      24     117     —      141  

Inventories

   —      —      87     134     —      221  

Other current assets

   —      50    —       50     —      100  

Current assets of discontinued operations

   —      —      138     3     —      141  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   —      118    249     337     —      704  

Investments and other assets

   —      122    36     24     —      182  

Intercompany investments

   (202  1,196    726     —       (1,720  —    

Intercompany receivables (payables)

   —      (672  247     425     —      —    

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —      2    50     71     —      123  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $(202 $766   $1,308    $857    $(1,720 $1,009  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $—     $6   $65    $50    $—     $121  

Notes payable

   —      —      —       23     —      23  

Current maturities of long-term debt

   —      7    —       —       —      7  

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

   —      8    3     8     —      19  

Other accrued liabilities

   —      22    14     42     —      78  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   —      —      29     2     —      31  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   —      43    111     125     —      279  

Deferred employee benefits and noncurrent liabilities

   —      17    1    6     —      24  

Long-term debt net of current maturities

   —      907    —       —       —      907  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   —      967    112     131     —      1,210  

Total shareholder’s equity

   (202  (201  1,196     726     (1,720  (201
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $(202 $766   $1,308    $857    $(1,720 $1,009  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Elimination   Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

         

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  $—      $(20 $11   $23   $—      $14  

Investing activities

         

Proceeds from sales of assets

   —       —      —      9    —       9  

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   —       —      (1  —      —       (1

Change in restricted cash

   —       —      —      5    —       5  

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   —       —      (16  (39  —       (55

Other investing activities

   —       —      3    —      —       3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   —       —      (14  (25  —       (39

Financing activities

         

Net decrease in other short-term debt

   —       —      —      (6  —       (6

Proceeds from other debt

   —       —      —      20    —       20  

Payments of other debt

   —       —      —      (10  —       (10

Capital contribution

   —       —      —      2    —       2  

Net proceeds from ABL Revolver

   —       20    —      —      —       20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   —       20    —      6    —       26  

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —       —      —      (2  —       (2

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —       —      (3  2    —       (1

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   —       9    3    43    —       55  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—      $9   $—     $45   $—      $54  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2012

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent   Issuer  Guarantor  Non-Guarantor  Elimination   Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

         

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  $—      $151   $(58 $4   $—      $97  

Investing activities

         

Proceeds from sales of assets

   —       —      1    3    —       4  

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   —       —      (8  (19  —       (27
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   —       —      (7  (16  —       (23

Financing activities

         

Net decrease in other short-term debt

   —       —      —      (4  —       (4

Payments of other debt

   —       —      —      (2  —       (2

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —       (23  —      —      —       (23

Net payments of ABL Revolver

   —       (110  —      —      —       (110

Cash related to the deconsolidation of BPI

   —       —      (11  —      —       (11

Proceeds from BPI’s new credit facility

   —       —      76    —      —       76  

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —       (1  —      —      —       (1

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   —       (3  —      —      —       (3
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   —       (137  65    (6  —       (78

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —       —      —      1    —       1  

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —       14    —      (17  —       (3

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   —       9    —      45    —       54  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—      $23   $—     $28   $—      $51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc.

Guarantor Condensed

Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

(Dollars in millions)

  Parent  Issuer  Guarantor  Non-
Guarantor
  Elimination  Consolidated
Total
 

Operating activities

       

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  $352  $61   $17   $21   $(352) $99  

Investing activities

       

Investments in companies, net of cash acquired

   —      ���      —      (1  —      (1

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

   —      (1  (17  (13  —      (31
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   —      (1  (17  (14  —      (32

Financing activities

       

Repayment on Secured Notes

   —      (195  —      —      —      (195

Repayment on Subordinated Notes

   —      (367  —      —      —      (367

Dividend to Shareholder

   (352)  (352  —      —      352   (352

Repayment on Term Loans

   —      (3  —      —      —      (3

Payment of deferred financing costs

   —      (15  —      —      —      (15

Proceeds from Term Loans

   —      667    —      —      —      667  

Proceeds from Senior Notes

   —      250    —      —      —      250  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   —      (15  —      —      —      (15

Effect of exchange rates on cash

   —      —      —      (2  —      (2

Change in cash and cash equivalents

   —      45   —      5    —      50  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  $—     $23   $—     $28   $—     $51  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $—     $68   $—     $33   $—     $101  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

 

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2010,2013, the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is supported by written policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Framework”). Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth quarter of 20102013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B.Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Set forth below is certain information concerning the individuals serving as our executive officers and members of our Board, including their ages as of March 11, 2011.31, 2014.

 

Name

  Age  

Position

Terry R. McCormack  

Terry R. McCormack

6063  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (until March 31, 2014)
Steven P. Klueg  

Thomas H. Madden

6145  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (effective October 21, 2013)
Keith A. Wilson  

H. David Overbeeke

49President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

Keith A. Wilson

4952  President, Global Filtration GroupGroup; President and Chief Executive Officer (effective April 1, 2014)
Jorge C. Schertel  

Jorge C. Schertel

5962  President, Affinia Group S.A.
Richard A. Pizarek  58President, Global Chassis Group

Steven E. Keller

  5255  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Timothy J. Zorn

  5861  Vice President, Human Resources
Thomas H. Madden  64Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (until October 21, 2013)

Patrick M. Manning

  3841  Vice President, Business Development (until January 15, 2014)
Samuel T. Quick  

Kathleen G. Mehall

5954  Vice President, Information Technology (until March 15, 2014)
William M. Lasky  66Director

WilliamJames S. McElya

66Director
Donald J. Morrison53Director
Joseph A. Onorato65Director
John M. Lasky

Riess
  72Director
James A. Stern  63  Director
DirectorJoseph E. Parzick  

James S. McElya

6358  Director

Donald J. Morrison

50Director

Joseph A. Onorato

62Director

Joseph E. Parzick

55Director

John M. Riess

68Director

James A. Stern

60Director (resigned May 31, 2013)

Terry R. McCormack has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director on our Board since December 1, 2004. He held a variety of positions at Dana from 1974 through July 2000, when he was named President of Dana’s Aftermarket Group, a position he held until November 30, 2004. Mr. McCormack holds a B.S. degree in Psychology from Ball State University. He has completed the Harvard Advanced Management Program. Mr. McCormack serves asis Chairman of the board of directors of MEMA. HeCardone Industries Inc. Mr. McCormack is also a member of the Automotive Presidents’ Group.board of directors of MEMA. Mr. McCormack formerly served on the boards of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte’s Belk College School of Business and Blue Persuasion, a non-profit organization. Mr. McCormack delivered his resignation to our Board, effective March 31, 2014.

Thomas H. Madden has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer sincefrom January 1, 2007.2007 until October 21, 2013 and Mr. Madden retired from Affinia on December 31, 2013. Mr. Madden previously served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from December 1, 2004 until December 31, 2006. Mr. Madden formerly served as Vice President and Group Controller for the Aftermarket Group of Dana since 1998. Prior to that date, Mr. Madden held a variety of positions at Dana Corporation, including General Manager of Operations for Dana’s European Drivetrain and Transmission Group from 1989 to 1992. He earned a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Toledo. He also attended the University of Michigan Executive Business School.

H. David Overbeeke has served as our President, Global Brake & Chassis Group since July 14, 2008, having previously served as a Director of Affinia Group Inc. from April 1, 2008 until July 13, 2008. From April 2006 until February 2010 Mr. Overbeeke served as Operating Advisor for Oak Hill Capital Partners, a private equity firm and prior to that he spent over 20 years with General Electric (“GE”) in various roles including Executive Vice President and CIO Digital Media of NBC Universal, and General Manager of Fleet Operations at GE Aviation until departing GE in December, 2005.Mr. Overbeeke earned a BSe degree in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Business from the University of Waterloo. Mr. OverbeekeMadden serves on the board of directors of Wilton Re,Ariston Systems, LLC.

Steven P. Klueg has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 21, 2013. Prior to that, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of ReCommunity. Prior to joining ReCommunity, Mr. Klueg served as Vice President and Treasurer of World Fuel Services Corporation from August 2008 until August 2011. From April 2005 to August 2008, Mr. Klueg was the Assistant Treasurer of Ingersoll Rand Corporation and prior to that held various managerial positions at SPX Corporation, including Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Klueg earned a life reinsurance company, Torque Medical Holdings, Inc.B. A. degree in Accounting from Ohio University and Torque Medical, LLC, where hean M.B.A. from The Ohio State University. In addition, Mr. Klueg is also Chairman of the compensation committee. Mr. Overbeeke formerly served on the board of directors of Republic National Cabinet Corporation.a certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant.

Keith A. Wilson has served as our President, Global Filtration Group since January 1, 2008, having previously served as President, Under Hood Group from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2007. Mr. Wilson served as Vice President and General Manager of our Under Hood Group from December 1, 2004 until December 31, 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Wilson had served as Vice President and division manager of Wix Filtration Products Division of Dana. Mr. Wilson earned a B.A. in Marketing and Management from Ball State University and he is a graduate of Dana’s M.B.A. Program. He also served as Chairman of Dana’s Global Environmental Health & Safety Advisory Council. Mr. Wilson has been appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2014.

Jorge C. Schertel has served as our President, Affinia Group S.A. since January 1, 2011, having previously served as our Vice President, Commercial Distribution, South America from January 1, 2008 until December 31, 2010. Mr. Schertel served as our Vice President and General Manager South America from June 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007 and from December 1, 2004 to May 31, 2006 as our Vice President and General Manager Brazil. Mr. Schertel earned a B.A. in Business Administration from PUC-RGS, Brazil. He also attended the Executive Management Program at Penn State University and the Executive Development Program at the University of Michigan Business School. Mr. Schertel serves on the Council Director of SINDIPECAS (Brazilian Association for Autoparts Manufacturers).

Richard A. Pizarek has served as our President, Global Chassis Group since December 1, 2012, having previously served as Vice-President and General Manager of the Global Chassis Group from September 1, 2010 until November 30, 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Pizarek served as Vice President and General Manager of Affinia’s Asia Operations in Shanghai, China. Mr. Pizarek serves on the Board of Directors of QH Talbros of Delhi, India. Mr. Pizarek earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from Indiana University.

Steven E. Keller has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 1, 2007. Mr. Keller served as our General Counsel and Secretary from December 1, 2004 until December 31, 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Keller served as Managing Attorney and a member of the Dana Law Department’s Operating Committee. Mr. Keller earned a B.A. in Financial Administration from Michigan State University and a J.D. from the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William and Mary. He also attended the University of Michigan Executive Business School. He is a member of the Virginia Bar.

Timothy J. Zorn has served as our Vice President, Human Resources since December 1, 2004. Mr. Zorn held the same position with the Aftermarket Group of Dana from May 16, 2003 until November 30, 2004 and was previously the Human Resources Manager of Dana’s Wix division from May 1999 until May 2003. Mr. Zorn earned his B.A. in Economics from Ohio Wesleyan University. He is a certified Senior Professional Human Resources and has served terms on the boards of directors of several charitable and educational organizations.

Patrick M. Manninghas served as our Vice President, Business Development sincefrom January 1, 2009.2009 until his separation from Affinia on January 15, 2014. Mr. Manning previously served as our Director, Business Development from December 1, 2004 until December 31, 2008. Mr. Manning was a Manager of Corporate Development in 2003 and Director of Business Development in 2004 at Dana. Mr. Manning earned a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and an M.B.A. from Southern Connecticut State University.

Kathleen G. MehallSamuel T. Quickwas recently announced has served as our Vice President,Chief Information Technology. Mrs. MehallOfficer since November 1, 2012. Mr. Quick previously worked as an independent information technology consultant in 2010, and also served as Vice President of Technology for Urban Science from 2008 until 2009.Information Technology. He joined us in October, 2007, as the leader of IT Applications Development & Support. Prior to that, Mrs. Mehalljoining Affinia, Mr. Quick served as Vice Presidentin strategic IT roles at Smurfit Stone, Merck, Alcon Laboratories (Nestle), Tyco Healthcare and CIO Corporate Services for General Motors Acceptance Corporation from 2006 to 2008Moog Automotive. He is currently a member of the Infor Automotive Executive Council and Director of CIO Planning for General Motors from 2004 to 2006. Mrs. Mehall earned a B.S. degree in Computer ScienceBusiness Administration from Pennsylvania StateFontbonne University. Mr. Quick will no longer be employed by us after March 15, 2014.

William M. Lasky has served as a director on our Board since January 1, 2011. Mr. Lasky is currently Chairman of the Board of Accuride Corporation. He has served as a member of Accuride Corporation’s Board of Directors sincefrom 2007 and as Chairman since 2009.from 2009 until his decision not to seek reelection following the conclusion of his term in April 2012. In addition to his board service, Mr. Lasky served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Accuride Corporation from September 2008 until February 2011. Mr. Lasky is also Chairman of the Board for Stoneridge, Inc. Previously, he served as Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of JLG Industries and spent much of his career with Dana Corporation. Mr. Lasky is a graduate of both Norwich University and Harvard Business School.School’s Advanced Management Program. He has served in the United States Army as a Pilot Captain and is a member of the Board of Trustees for Norwich University.

James S. McElyahas served as a director on our Board since January 1, 2011. Mr. McElya is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Standard Holdings Inc. and its principal operating company, Cooper Standard Automotive. Cooper Standard filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in August 2009 and emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings in May 2010. Previously, he had served as Chief Executive Officer and also previously as Corporate Vice President of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, the parent company of Cooper Standard, until 2004. Mr. McElya formerly served on the board of directors of BPI Holdings International Inc. Mr. McElya has also served as President of Siebe Automotive Worldwide and over a 22-year period held various senior management positions with Handy & Harman. Mr. McElya is a past chairman of the Motor Equipment Manufacturers Association (MEMA) and Original Equipment Supplier Association (OESA).

Donald J. Morrison has served as a Director on our Board since December 1, 2004. Mr. Morrison is a Senior Managing Director with OMERS Private Equity, which makes private equity investments on behalf of OMERS, one of Canada’s largest pension funds. Before joining OMERS, Mr. Morrison spent over ten years with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Corporate Finance focusing on restructurings and turnarounds and eight years as Senior Vice President and member of the Senior Management Investment Committee with one of Canada’s largest venture capital funds originating and structuring expansion and buyout investments. Mr. Morrison has served on the boards of directors of over 20 public and private companies. Mr. Morrison earned a B. Commerce degree from the University of Toronto, is a Chartered Accountant, Chartered Insolvency and Restructuring Practitioner, and a Chartered Director.

Joseph A. Onorato has served as a Director on our Board since December 1, 2004. Mr. Onorato also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee of our Board. Mr. Onorato was Chief Financial Officer of Echlin, Inc., where he spent 19 years. He served as Treasurer from 1990 to 1994, as Vice President and Treasurer from 1994 to 1997 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1997 until the company was acquired by Dana in July 1998. Mr. Onorato served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Aftermarket Group of Dana from July 1998 until his retirement in September 2000. Mr. Onorato previously worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Onorato also serves on the board of directors of Mohawk Industries Inc.

Joseph E. Parzickhas served as a Director on our Board since August 12, 2008. Mr. Parzick also serves as where he is Chairman of the NominatingAudit Committee of our Board. Mr. Parzick is the Managing Partnerand a member of the Torque Capital Group LLC which he co-founded in 2011. From June 2003 until December 2010 he was a Managing Director of Cypress Advisors, Inc. Prior to joining Cypress, he spent the previous four years as a Managing Director in Morgan Stanley’s financial sponsor group. Immediately prior to this, he was a professional employee of EXOR America Inc., a merchant banking affiliate of the Agnelli Group and Lehman Brothers, where he was a Managing Director and co-head of the financial sponsors group. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Virginia and an M.B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.Compensation Committee. Mr. Parzick also servesOnorato formerly served on the boards of directors of Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, Republic National Cabinet Group, and Q.bel Foods, LLC, and is Chairman of the board of directors of Torque MedicalBPI Holdings International Inc. and Torque Medical, LLC. Mr. Parzick formerly served on the boards of Danka Business Systems PLC and Stone Canyon Entertainment Corporation.

John M. Riess has served as a Director on our Board since December 1, 2004. Mr. Riess was elected Lead Director on December 2, 2010. He formerly served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Breed Technologies, Inc. from 2000 to 2003 when he retired. Prior to this, Mr. Riess held various management and executive positions within the Gates Rubber Company, serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Riess also servesformerly served on the board of directors of Formed Fiber Technologies, Inc. where he is Chairman of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee. He formerly served as chairman of the board of directors of Breed Technologies, Inc.

James A. Stern has served as a Director on our Board since December 1, 2004. On December 2, 2010, Mr. Stern was elected Chairman of our Board. Mr. Stern also serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee of our Board. Mr. Stern is also a director of CTS Investments. Mr. Stern is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cypress, a position he has held since 1994. Mr. Stern headed Lehman Brothers’ Merchant Banking Group before leaving that firm to help found Cypress. During his 20-year tenure with Lehman, he held senior management positions where he was responsible for the high yield and primary capital markets groups. He also served as co-head of investment banking and was a member of Lehman’s operating committee. Before graduating from Harvard Business School, Mr. Stern earned a B.S. from Tufts University, where he iswas Chairman of the Board of Trustees.Trustees until November 2013. Mr. Stern formerly served on the boards of Lear Corporation, AMTROL, Inc., Med Pointe, Inc., and Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Not Applicable.

Board Composition and Director Qualifications

Our Board currently consists of one class of eightseven directors who serve until resignation or removal. The Board seeks to ensure that it is composed of members whose particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, will allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. In that regard, the Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending candidates for all directorships to be filled by the Board. In identifying candidates for membership on the Board, the Nominating Committee takes into account (1) minimum individual qualifications, such as high ethical standards, integrity, maturity, careful judgment, industry knowledge or experience and an ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board and (2) all other factors that it considers appropriate, including alignment with our stockholders, especially Cypress, OMERS and others.

When considering whether the Board’s directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the Board members’ or nominees’ biographical information set forth above.

Each of the Company’s directors possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity and exercises careful, mature judgment. Each is committed to employing his skills and abilities to aid the long-term interests of the stakeholders of the Company. In addition, our directors are knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business endeavors which further qualifies them for service as members of the Board.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated as of November 30, 2004,2012, among Affinia Group Holdings Inc., various Cypress funds, OMERS, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Stockwell Fund, L.P., the number of directors serving on the Board of Directors will be no less than seven and no more than eleven. The Stockholders Agreement entitles Cypress to designate three directors. Cypress currently has appointed, Mr. Stern Mr. Parzick and Mr. McElya. As long as OMERS members own at least 50 percent in the aggregate number of shares owned by them on November 30, 2004, OMERS is entitled to designate one director, who currently is Mr. Morrison. Cypress is entitled to designate three directors not affiliated with any of the parties to the Stockholders Agreement, who currently are Mr. Onorato, Mr. Riess and Mr. Lasky. Additionally, the Stockholders Agreement entitles the individual serving as CEO, currently Mr. McCormack, and another individual serving as one of our senior officers, currently vacant, to seats on the Board of Directors. The Stockholders Agreement also provides that the nominating committeeNominating Committee of the Board of Directors may from time to time select two additional individuals who must be independent to serve as Directors.

Each of Messrs. Stern Parzick and Morrison possesses experience as a private equity investor in owning and managing enterprises like the Company and is familiar with corporate finance, strategic business planning activities and issues involving stakeholders more generally. In particular, Mr. Stern has significant experience in high yield and primary capital markets activities, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cypress since 1994 and as the head of Lehman Brothers’ Merchant Banking Group prior to 1994. Mr. Parzick has significant experience in management, having been involved in numerous investments as a managing director of Cypress from 2003 to 2011. Mr. Morrison has significant experience in accounting and management, having spent over ten years with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in corporate finance focusing on restructurings and turnarounds and having served on the boards of directors of over 20 public and private companies.

Each of Messrs. Lasky, McElya, Onorato, Reiss and McCormack possesses substantial expertise in advising and managing companies related to the aftermarket replacement parts industry. Mr. Onorato has significant experience in finance and accounting within the aftermarket industry, having served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Aftermarket Group at Dana Corporation from 1998 to 2000 and prior to that as an officer at Echlin Inc., in financial positions of increasing responsibility over 19 years, including as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Riess has extensive business experience in the aftermarket replacement parts industry and has experience in management, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Breed Technologies, Inc. and Gates Rubber Company. Mr. McCormack has extensive knowledge of our business and the aftermarket replacement parts industry generally, having served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2004 with responsibility for the day-to-day oversight of the Company’s business operations. Mr. Lasky has extensive business experience in the manufacturing industry and in the aftermarket replacement parts industry, having served in management roles in our filtration business when it was owned by Dana, as well as substantial experience in management having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of both Accuride Corporation and JLG Industries. Mr. McElya has substantial manufacturing experience and experience in management, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper Standard Holdings Inc. and in management positions of increasing responsibility over his prior career.

Board Committees

Audit Committee

We have an Audit Committee, consisting of Mr. Onorato, Mr. Lasky, Mr. Morrison and Mr. Riess. Mr. Onorato, the chairman of our Audit Committee, is our “audit committee financial expert��expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist our Board in overseeing and monitoring: (1) the quality and integrity of our financial statements; (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence; (4) the performance of our internal audit function and (5) the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The written charter for the Audit Committee is available on our website.

Compensation Committee

We have a Compensation Committee, consisting of Mr. Stern (Chairman), Mr. Riess, Mr. Onorato and Mr. McElya. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist our Board in discharging its responsibility relating to: (1) setting our compensation program and compensation of our executive officers and directors; (2) monitoring our incentive and equity-based compensation plans and (3) preparing the compensation committee report required to be included in our annual report on Form 10-K following the completion of this offering under the rules and regulations of the SEC.

The written charter for the Compensation Committee is available on our website.

Nominating Committee

We have a Nominating Committee, consisting of Mr. Parzick (Chairman), Mr. Onorato and Mr. Morrison.

The purpose of our Nominating Committee is to assist our Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to: (1) developing and recommending criteria for selecting new directors; (2) screening and recommending to the Board individuals qualified to become executive officers and (3) handling such other matters as are specifically delegated to the Nominating Committee by the Board.

The written charter for the Nominating Committee is available on our website.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. The code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.affiniagroup.com. We will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to or waivers of, our code of business conduct on our website.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

Item 11. Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The primary objectives of our compensation program are to attract and retain talented executives to lead our company and promote our short- and long-term growth. Our compensation program establishes a link between sustained corporate performance and individual rewards, such as ownership opportunities for our executives and key employees. We believe that this link ensures a balance between delivering near-term results and creating long-term value for our investors.

We seek to foster a performance-oriented culture that aligns individual efforts with organizational objectives. Company performance and accomplishments are the primary measures of success upon which we structure our compensation programs. We evaluate and reward our executive officers based upon their contributions to the achievement of our goals.

We reinforce our overall compensation objectives by compensating our executive officers primarily through base salary, non-equity incentive awards, long-term equity incentive awards, competitive benefits packages and perquisites.

Our named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102013 were: Terry R. McCormack (President and Chief Executive Officer), Thomas H. Madden (former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), Steven P. Klueg (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), H. David Overbeeke (President, Global Brake & Chassis Group), Keith A. Wilson (President, Global Filtration Group) and, Jorge C. Schertel (President, Affinia Group S.A.) and Steven E. Keller (Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary).

Compensation Committee Role

The Compensation Committee, composed entirely of non-management directors, administers our executive compensation program. The role of the Compensation Committee is to oversee our compensation and benefit plans and policies, administer our parent company’s 2005 Stock Plan (including reviewing and approving equity grants to executive officers), establish annual goals and objectives for our Chief Executive Officer, and review and approve annually all compensation decisions relating to executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining sound principles for the development and administration of compensation and benefit programs, as well as ensuring that we maintain strong links between executive pay and performance. The Compensation Committee’s charter details the Compensation Committee’s specific responsibilities and functions. The Compensation Committee annually reviews its charter, with the most recent review occurring at the Compensation Committee’s August 24, 2010December 4, 2013 meeting. The full text of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on our website at www.affiniagroup.com. The Compensation Committee’s membership is determined by our Board of Directors and its meeting agendas are established by the Committee Chair. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and Vice President of Human Resources generally attend meetings of the Compensation Committee, but do not attend executive sessions and do not participate in determining their specific compensation. There were four formal meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2010,2013, all of which included an executive session. Executive sessions are held with the Compensation Committee members only. The Compensation Committee holds meetings in person, by telephone and also considers and takes action by written consent.

General Compensation Philosophy and Elements of Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that compensation paid to executive officers should be closely aligned with our performance on both a short-term and long-term basis, and that such compensation should enable us to attract, motivate and retain key executives critical to our long-term success. Total compensation should be structured to ensure that a significant portion of compensation opportunity will be directly related to factors that drive future financial and operating performance and align our executive officers’ long-term interests with those of our investors. To that end, the Compensation Committee has determined that the total compensation program for executive officers should consist of the following elements:

 

 (A)Base Salaries

We pay each executive officer a base salary based on the rate of pay that the executive has received in the past, whether the executive’s position or responsibilities associated with his or her position have changed, whether the complexity or scope of his or her responsibilities has increased, and how his or her position relates to other executives and their rate of base salary. While a significant portion of each executive officer’s compensation is “at risk” in the form of non-equity incentive awards (annual cash performance bonuses) and long-term equity incentive awards, the Compensation Committee believes that executive officers should also have the stability and predictability of fixed base salary payments.

 (B)Non-Equity Incentive Awards

We provide our executive officersFor fiscal 2013, the opportunity to earn annual non-equity incentive awards (cash performance bonuses) to encourage and reward exceptional contributions to our overall financial, operational and strategic success. AmountsCompensation Committee determined that amounts payable under the cash incentive award program would depend on our overallcompany consolidated adjusted EBITDA performance, the adjusted EBITDA performance of our business units and for Mr. Madden (and other key corporate office employees), oura discretionary amount based on the achievement of working capital levels and the overall debt level of the Company. For Messrs. McCormack, Madden, Klueg, Keller and the other executive officers at the corporate level, in order to emphasize the Company’s consolidated performance, the Compensation Committee determined that company consolidated adjusted EBITDA would determine 75% of Messrs. McCormack, Madden, Klueg and Keller’s target bonus opportunity. For Messrs. Wilson and Schertel, in order to emphasize their respective business plan net expenses. unit’s performance, the Compensation Committee determined that their respective business unit’s performance would determine 75% of Messrs. Wilson and Schertel’s target bonus opportunity.

We established the company consolidated and the business unit adjusted EBITDA performance targetslevels for our 20102013 non-equity incentive awards such that the threshold performance level (adjusted EBITDAlevels were between 82% and 95% of $160 million) was reasonably likely to be achieved, while the target performance level (adjusted EBITDA of $190 million), whichlevels, the target performance levels required significant improvement over actual 20092012 performance, wasand the maximum performance levels were substantially more challenging to achieve.

Our overall EBITDA performance for fiscal 2010,2013, as adjusted by the Compensation Committee, was $181$187 million. The discussionAdjusted EBITDA for this purpose was calculated as follows ($ millions):

Net income from continuing operations

  $5  

Income tax provision

   22  

Depreciation and amortization

   21  

Interest expense

   73  

EBITDA from discontinued operations

   16  
  

 

 

 

EBITDA

   137  

Restructuring expenses

   6  

Other(1)

   44  
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA for Compensation Purposes

   187  
  

 

 

 

(1)Consists mainly of adjustments for certain expenses relating to our refinancing in April 2013, expenses associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters, certain non-recurring legal and professional services expenses and other costs incurred in connection with various strategic initiatives.

Business unit EBITDA is calculated on a comparable basis. Detail describing how the non-equity incentive plan awards for fiscal 20102013 were calculated appears below under “—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20102013 Table.” Adjusted EBITDA for this purpose was calculated as follows ($ millions):

Net income attributable to the Company

  $24  

Income tax provision

   27  

Depreciation and amortization

   37  

Interest expense

   66  
     

EBITDA

   154  

Equity in income, net of tax

   (1

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax

   6  

Restructuring expenses

   24  

Other(1)

   (2
     

Adjusted EBITDA for Compensation Purposes

  $181  
     

(1)Consists of adjustments for certain non-recurring items, non-controlling interest adjustments and a reduction for the discontinued operation depreciation and operating loss.

We have also adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation program pursuant to which our executive officers can elect to defer all or a portion of their non-equity incentive awards. Any deferred amount is notionally invested in Holdings’ common stock and a portion is matched in the form of an additional notional investment in Holdings’ common stock. The principal terms of the non-qualified deferred compensation program appear below under “—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.” For fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee determined to suspend the program, and the program remains suspended for fiscal 2014.

 

 (C)Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

We provide long-term equity incentive awards in the form of stock options or restricted stock units to each of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards align the interests of our executive officers with those of our investors and provide an effective incentive for our executive officers to remain with us. The principal terms of the restricted stock unit grants are described below under “—Outstanding Equity Awards at 20102013 Fiscal Year-End.”

 

 (D)Certain Other Benefits

We provide our executive officers with those benefits and perquisites that we believe assist us in retaining their services. Some of these benefits are available to our employees generally (e.g., contributions to a defined contribution (401(k)) plan, health care coverage and paid vacation days) and some are available to a more limited number of key employees, including our Named Executive Officers (e.g., car allowances and tax preparation services). The specific benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer are described in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” and in the “Incremental Cost of Perquisites and Other Compensation Table.”

Our executive compensation decisions are based primarily upon our assessment of each executive’s leadership and operational performance and potential to enhance long-term shareholder value. We rely on our judgment about each individual (and not on rigid formulas or temporary fluctuations in business performance) in determining the optimal magnitude and mix of compensation elements and whether each payment or award provides an appropriate incentive for performance that sustains and enhances long-term shareholder value. Key factors affecting our judgment include the executive officer’s performance compared to the financial,

operational and strategic goals established for the executive at the beginning of the year; nature, scope and level of responsibilities; contribution to our financial results, particularly with respect to key metrics such as EBITDA, net working capital and cash flow; effectiveness in leading our restructuring plans and contribution to our commitment to corporate responsibility, including success in creating a culture of integrity and compliance with applicable laws and our ethics policies. The importance of each factor varies by individual. We also consider each executive’s current salary and prior-year bonus, the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer regarding compensation for the executives he directly supervises, the appropriate balance between incentives for long-term and short-term performance, the compensation paid to the executive’s peers within the Company. From time to time, the Compensation Committee also receives independent advice on competitive practices from Towers Perrin.Watson. When using peer data to evaluate executive compensation, the Compensation Committee may consider ranges of compensation paid by others for a particular position, both by reference to comparative groups of companies of similar size and stature and, more particularly, a group comprised of our direct competitors, as one point of reference when making compensation decisions regarding total compensation or particular elements of compensation under consideration. The Compensation Committee does not typically use information with respect to our peer companies and other comparable public companies to establish targets for total compensation, or any element of compensation, or otherwise numerically benchmark its compensation decisions. For example, the Compensation Committee has in prior years reviewed pay data for a range of companies in connection with the review of base salaries for our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee did not, however, use third-party data in establishing fiscal 20102013 compensation for our Named Executive Officers. None of our Named Executive Officers (including our Chief Executive Officer) participate in determining their specific compensation. In addition, we review the total compensation potentially payable to, and the benefits accruing to, the executive, including (1) current value of outstanding equity incentive awards and (2) potential payments under each executive’s employment agreement upon termination of employment or a change in control.

Given the uncertain economic conditions during 2008 and 2009, the Compensation Committee, on the recommendation of our Chief Executive Officer, maintained our Named Executive Officers’ compensation (including base salary) without change for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 calendar years (with the exception of Mr. Wilson’s salary which was increased to $425,000 with effect from April 1, 2010).

Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements

On July 21, 2005, we entered into employment agreements with Messrs. McCormack, Madden, Wilson and Wilson,Keller, with substantially identical terms, except as noted below. On December 15, 2008, we entered into Amended and Restated Employment Agreements with each of those executives to effectuate certain non-material amendments for compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and, on August 11, 2010, we entered into an amendment to each of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements to effectuate certain non-material clarifications to the termination provisions thereof.

Each employment agreement has an initial employment term which commenced as of May 1, 2005 and is automatically extended for successive one-year periods on each December 31 unless either party provides the other 90 days prior written notice that the employment term will not be so extended. Under the employment agreements, Messrs. McCormack, Wilson, Madden and MaddenKeller are each entitled to a specified base salary, subject to increases, if any, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Currently,Effective January 1, 2013, the base salaries for Messrs. McCormack, Wilson, Madden and MaddenKeller pursuant to their employment agreements are $650,000, $425,000were increased to $747,000, $515,000, $345,000, and $300,000,$345,000, respectively, as the same may be increased from time to time. In connection with Mr. Wilson’s appointment as our Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2014, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Wilson’s base salary to $600,000 effective April 1, 2014. In addition, the employment agreements provide that these Named Executive Officers are eligible to earn target annual cash incentive awards as a percentage of base salary (100% for Messrs. McCormack and Wilson and 80% for Mr. Madden)Messrs. Madden and Keller) upon the achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. Messrs. McCormack, Wilson, Madden and MaddenKeller are entitled to higher awards for performance in excess of targeted performance goals, lower awards for performance that does not meet targeted performance goals and no award for performance that does not meet threshold performance goals.

On June 28, 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Overbeeke, outlining the principal terms of his employment relationship with us. The letter agreement provides that Mr. Overbeeke is entitled to a base salary of $600,000 per year, subject to annual adjustment, and is eligible to earn a target annual cash incentive award of 100% of base salary upon the achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. As with the other executives, Mr. Overbeeke is entitled to a higher award for performance in excess of targeted performance goals, lower awards for performance that does not meet targeted performance goals and no award for performance that does not meetexceed threshold performance goals. Mr. Overbeeke also received a signing bonusMadden retired on December 31, 2013 and, for purposes of $750,000determining his payments and is entitled to other benefits commensurate withunder his employment agreement, the benefits availableCompensation Committee determined to our other executive officers.treat his separation from service as a “termination without cause.”

Each executive (including Mr. Schertel)Schertel and Mr. Klueg) has agreed, either in his employment agreement or separately, to certain post-termination restrictions, and each executive is entitled to certain payments and benefits depending on the reason for termination. A description of these provisions, together with a table detailing amounts payable to our Named Executive Officers upon certain termination events, appears below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Letter Agreements

On May 31, 2013, Mr. Terry R. McCormack, our President and Chief Executive Officer, entered into a letter agreement (the “McCormack Letter Agreement”) with Affinia Group Holdings amending his employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Affinia and his restricted stock unit agreement (the “RSU Agreement”) with Holdings in certain respects. The McCormack Letter Agreement is intended to provide Mr. McCormack with an opportunity to receive fixed cash payments in the aggregate amount of up to $5 million in lieu of one-half of the restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that were outstanding under the RSU Agreement and in lieu of receiving potential cash severance payments under his Employment Agreement following his termination of employment. Accordingly, the number of RSUs held by Mr. McCormack under his RSU Agreement has been reduced from 61,398.72 to 30,699.36. The cash payments to Mr. McCormack under the McCormack Letter Agreement will be made partially in annual installments over up to four years commencing on May 31, 2014, and partially in installments following Mr. McCormack’s termination of employment. The timing

of payments under the Letter Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the terms of the McCormack Letter Agreement, Mr. McCormack will also be entitled to receive a pro-rata annual bonus with respect to the year in which he terminates employment and he will also be entitled to receive continued health insurance benefits from the Company for two years following his termination of employment (in each case, corresponding to the termination benefits that Mr. McCormack was previously entitled to receive under his Employment Agreement). Mr. McCormack will forfeit his rights to the special payments and benefits under the McCormack Letter Agreement in the event of his voluntary resignation (other than for “good reason”) prior to reaching age 65 or in the event that his employment is terminated for “cause.”

On October 11, 2013, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Steven P. Klueg outlining the principal terms of his employment relationship with us as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Klueg letter agreement (the “Klueg Letter Agreement”) provides Mr. Klueg’s annual base compensation will be $325,000 and he will be eligible to earn an annual bonus equal to 80% of his base compensation (prorated for 2013) under Affinia’s annual cash incentive award plan. Mr. Klueg is also entitled to a monthly car allowance of $1,250 and to a signing bonus of $90,000, which was paid on November 1, 2013. If Mr. Klueg’s employment is terminated without cause or if he resigns employment for good reason he will be entitled to (1) an amount equal to his annual base salary, payable in equal installments for twelve consecutive months and (2) continued medical and dental coverage during such twelve month period. Mr. Klueg was also granted 12,279.74 restricted stock units (subsequently adjusted to 14,124.29 restricted stock units) under and subject to the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, 50% of which contain the same performance-based vesting conditions (and other terms and conditions) as other holders of restricted stock units and 50% of which are time-based vesting and vest in four equal annual installments on each anniversary of October 21, 2013. Similar to the existing performance-based vesting restricted stock units, the time-based vesting restricted stock units will also vest following a “qualifying termination” of the holder’s employment due to an involuntary termination by us without cause, the holder’s resignation of employment for good reason or due to the holder’s death, disability or retirement, if either of the performance conditions is met upon or prior to the first to occur of (1) a final exit by The Cypress Group L.L.C. of its equity investment in Affinia Group Holdings Inc. or (2) one year following the termination date. In addition, the unvested portion of the time-based vesting restricted stock units, if any, will vest upon the occurrence of a change in control of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. In connection with the grant of restricted stock units, Mr. Klueg entered into a restricted stock unit agreement, a management stockholders agreement, a sale participation agreement and a confidentiality, non- competition and proprietary information agreement consistent with the forms of such agreements entered into by Affinia’s other holders of restricted stock units.

In December 2013, we offered RSU holders having their principal place of employment in our Ann Arbor, Michigan corporate office (including Messrs. McCormack, Madden and Keller) the opportunity to convert their RSUs to cash for a payment equal to thirty percent of the anticipated value of such RSU holder’s RSUs upon the occurrence of a Vesting Event (as defined in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement). All such RSU holders, including Messrs. McCormack, Madden and Keller, accepted our offer, the terms of which are described in the following paragraphs. Each such RSU holder’s RSUs have been canceled. We are required to make payment to each such RSU holder within 30 days after their separation from service, provided that no payment is required if the RSU holder voluntarily resigns or is terminated for “cause.”

On December 19, 2013, Holdings entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Terry R. McCormack (the “McCormack Letter Agreement”), our President and Chief Executive Officer, terminating his restricted stock unit agreement (the “McCormack RSU Agreement”) with Holdings. Under the terms of the McCormack Letter Agreement, Mr. McCormack will be eligible receive a cash payment of $1,500,000 (the “McCormack RSU Settlement Amount”) in consideration of his surrender and forfeiture of his rights under the McCormack RSU Agreement, which agreement was terminated effective as of the date of the McCormack Letter Agreement. Mr. McCormack will be eligible to receive the McCormack RSU Settlement Amount in a lump sum within 30 days following the first to occur of (i) the termination of Mr. McCormack’s employment by Holdings other than for “cause,” (ii) the termination of Mr. McCormack’s employment due to death or disability, (iii) Mr. McCormack’s resignation for “good reason,” or (iv) Mr. McCormack’s resignation for any reason after reaching age 65. Mr. McCormack will not be entitled to receive the McCormack RSU Settlement Amount or any other payment or distribution in respect of his restricted stock units if his employment is terminated for “cause” or if he voluntarily terminates his employment other than for “good reason” prior to reaching age 65. The timing of payments under the McCormack Letter Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. We previously announced that Mr. McCormack had notified the Board of Directors of Affinia of his resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinia and as a member of the Board effective March 31, 2014. We also previously announced that Mr. McCormack would continue his service after March 31, 2014 as a special advisor to the Chairman of the Board. Mr. McCormack has agreed to serve in such capacity for the remainder of fiscal 2014 and Mr. McCormack will be paid $225,000 payable in quarterly installments of $75,000 each.

On December 19, 2013, Holdings entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Thomas H. Madden (the “Madden Letter Agreement”), our former Chief Financial Officer, terminating his restricted stock unit agreement (the “Madden RSU Agreement”) with Holdings. Under the terms of the Madden Letter Agreement, Mr. Madden received a cash payment of $900,000 (the “Madden RSU Settlement Amount”) in consideration of his surrender and forfeiture of his rights under the Madden RSU Agreement, which agreement was terminated effective as of the date of the Madden Letter Agreement. Mr. Madden received the Madden RSU Settlement Amount in a lump sum following his separation from service on December 31, 2013. The timing of payments under the Madden Letter Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Affinia had previously announced that Mr. Madden had stepped down as Chief Financial Officer of Affinia effective October 21, 2013 and would continue to perform services until December 31, 2013.

In connection with the planned relocation of the corporate office of Affinia Group Inc. (“Affinia”) to North Carolina in 2014, Mr. Steven E. Keller, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, will be leaving Affinia on a date to be determined. For the purpose of retaining the services of Mr. Keller during the transition to the North Carolina location, on January 8, 2014, Affinia and Holdings entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Keller (the “Keller Letter Agreement”), providing for a retention bonus opportunity and terminating his restricted stock unit agreement (the “Keller RSU Agreement”) with Holdings. Under the terms of the Keller Letter Agreement, Mr. Keller will be eligible to receive a retention bonus of $250,000, which will be paid in a lump sum on the first payroll date on or following the first to occur of (i) June 30, 2014 (subject to Mr. Keller’s continued employment through such date), (ii) the termination of Mr. Keller’s employment by Affinia other than for “cause,” (iii) the termination of Mr. Keller’s employment due to death or disability, or (iv) Mr. Keller’s resignation for “good reason.” Under the terms of the Keller Letter Agreement, Mr. Keller will also be eligible receive a cash payment of $600,000 (the “Keller RSU Settlement Amount”) in consideration of his surrender and forfeiture of his rights under the Keller RSU Agreement, which agreement was terminated effective as of the date of the Keller Letter Agreement. Mr. Keller will be eligible to receive the Keller RSU Settlement Amount in a lump sum within 30 days following the date he receives his retention bonus payment. Mr. Keller will not be entitled to receive the Keller RSU Settlement Amount or any other payment or distribution in respect of his restricted stock units if his employment is terminated for “cause” or if he voluntarily terminates his employment other than for “good reason.” In addition, pursuant to the Keller Letter Agreement, within 30 days of Mr. Keller’s termination of employment, Holdings will repurchase all shares of Holdings common stock held by Mr. Keller for a purchase price per common share equal to the fair market value per share on the date of payment, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The timing of payments under the Keller Letter Agreement is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Pursuant to the Keller Letter Agreement, Affinia has also agreed to indemnify Mr. Keller with respect to his service as an officer and employee of Affinia and has agreed that Mr. Keller will remain a beneficiary (or will receive the same benefits as a beneficiary) of the Affinia directors and officers fiduciary liability policy with respect to all periods of his employment.

At its meeting on March 10, 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that, to assure an effective transition of our corporate office functions, an additional retention amount would be payable to certain employees in our Ann Arbor office, including Mr. McCormack ($125,000) and Mr. Keller ($100,000), on the same terms and conditions as such employee’s existing retention arrangement, or, if no current retention arrangement exists, at the time such employee is terminated by the Company without cause.

Adjustments to Compensation for Financial Restatements

It is theThe Board’s policy is that the Compensation Committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to executive officers and certain other employees where the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Where applicable, we will seek to recover any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by any executive.

Option Exchange Program

On August 25, 2010, Holdings commenced an offer to certain eligible option holders, including our Named Executive Officers, to exchange their existing options to purchase shares of Holdings’ common stock for restricted stock unit awards with new vesting terms (the “Option Exchange”). As part of a review of our executive compensation and employee benefit arrangements on behalf of and under the supervision of our Board, and in light of the economic conditions in which we operate, it was determined that the restricted stock units may be better suited than the existing options to meet our objectives to motivate, retain and reward the eligible option holders.

The Option Exchange was completed on October 18, 2010 and all of the option holders who were eligible for the Option Exchange elected to participate in the exchange. The restricted stock units granted in connection with the Option Exchange are governed by 2005 Stock Plan and a new Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into by each grantee, including each of our Named Executive Officers. The restricted stock units granted in connection with the Option Exchange are subject to performance-based vesting restrictions, which have been modified from the performance and time-based vesting restrictions applicable to the options for which they were issued in the Option Exchange. The RSUs will vest if (i) the RSU holder remains employed with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. on the date that either of the following vesting conditions occurs and (ii) either of the following vesting conditions occurs on or prior to the date on which Cypress ceases to hold any remaining Affinia Group Holdings Inc. common stock:

Cypress has received aggregate transaction proceeds in cash or marketable securities (not subject to escrow, lock-up, trading restrictions or claw-back) with respect to the disposition of more than 50% of its common equity interests in Holdings in an amount that represents a per-share equivalent value that is greater than or equal to two times the average per share price paid by Cypress for its common equity investment in Holdings; or

Holdings’ common stock trades on a public stock exchange at an average closing price of $225 (as adjusted for stock splits) over a 60 consecutive trading day period.

Following a “qualifying termination” of the holder’s employment due to an involuntary termination by us without cause or due to the holder’s death, disability or retirement, the restricted stock units granted in connection with the Option Exchange will also vest if either of the performance conditions described above is met upon or prior to the first to occur of (1) a final exit by Cypress of its equity investment in Holdings or (2) one year following the termination date.

See Note 13. “Stock Incentive Plan” of our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about the Option Exchange.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the options surrendered by, and the restricted stock units granted to, each of our Named Executive Officers in connection with the Option Exchange.

Name and Principal Position

  Exchanged Options   Restricted Stock
Units
Received
 
  Number of
Shares
   Exercise
Price
   

Terry R. McCormack,
President and Chief Executive Officer

   12,467    $100     50,000  

Thomas H. Madden,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   5,827    $100     15,000  

H. David Overbeeke,
President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

   3,300    $100     50,000  

Keith A. Wilson,
President, Global Filtration Group

   6,800    $100     30,000  

Jorge C. Schertel,
President, Affinia Group S.A.

   2,213    $100     10,000  

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us to or on behalf of our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers serving as of December 31, 2010.2012 and Mr. Overbeeke, who would otherwise have been included in our three other most highly compensated executive officers during 2012 but for the fact that he was no longer employed by us as of November 30, 2012. We collectively refer to these fivesix individuals herein as the Named Executive Officers. Mr. McCormack also served as a Director but received no separate remuneration in that capacity. Mr. Overbeeke served as one of our Directors in 2008 until becoming one of our executive officers.

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards(1)
($)
  Option
Awards(2)
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation(3)
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
  Total
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

  2010    650,000    -0-    4,372,958    -0-    557,050    -0-    102,800    5,682,808  
  2009    650,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    360,050    -0-    90,131    1,100,181  
  2008    650,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    -0-    -0-    33,938    683,938  

Thomas H. Madden
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  2010    300,000    -0-    1,142,325    -0-    222,720    -0-    50,155    1,715,200  
  2009    300,000    -0-    -0    -0-    171,540    -0-    38,538    510,078  
  2008    300,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    165,120    -0-    49,083    514,203  

H. David Overbeeke
President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

  2010    600,000    -0-    5,117,842    -0-    182,400    -0-    134,023    6,034,265  
  2009    600,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    125,000    -0-    154,260    879,260  
  2008    279,615    750,000(5)   -0-    91,500    312,246    -0-    76,676    1,510,037  

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

  2010    412,500    -0-    2,679,032    -0-    569,250    -0-    75,643    3,736,425  
  2009    375,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    508,125    -0-    82,500    965,625  
  2008    375,000    -0-    -0-    -0-    -0-    -0-    31,455    406,455  

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group S.A.

  2010    360,447(6)   -0-    897,345    -0-    225,885    -0-    124,857    1,608,534  
  2009    342,203    -0-    -0-    -0-    134,638    -0-    105,575    582,416  
  2008    249,858    -0-    -0-    -0-    250,640    -0-    189,403    689,901  

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards(1)
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
  Total
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer(4)

  

 
 

2013

2012
2011

  

  
  

  

 
 

747,000

725,000
725,000

  

  
  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

-0-

243,673
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

27,679

62,916
38,512

  

  
  

  

 
 

774,679

1,031,589
763,512

  

  
  

Steven P. Klueg(5)
Senior Vice President And Chief Financial Officer

  2013    65,416    90,000    1,936,620    -0-    54,625    -0-    5,057    2,151,718  

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

  

 
 

2013

2012
2011

  

  
  

  

 
 

515,000

500,000
500,000

  

  
  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

537,557

315,350
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

27,658

54,965
29,460

  

  
  

  

 
 

1,080,215

870,315
529,460

  

  
  

Jorge C. Schertel(6)
President, Affinia Group S.A.

  

 
 

2013

2012
2011

  

  
  

  
 
 
340,099
331,078
349,610
  
  
  
  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 

 

212,156

39,875

-0-

  

  

  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

76,236

85,203
94,945

  

  
  

  

 
 

628,491

456,156
444,555

  

  
  

Steven E. Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  

 

2013

2012

  

  

  

 

345,100

335,000

  

  

  

 

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

 

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

 

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

 

-0-

124,575

  

  

  

 

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

 

25,060

31,211

  

  

  

 

370,160

490,786

  

  

Thomas H. Madden(4)
Senior Vice President And Chief Financial Officer

  

 
 

2013

2012
2011

  

  
  

  

 
 

345,100

335,000
335,000

  

  
  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 

 

-0-

-0-

-0-

  

  

  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

-0-

90,075
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

-0-

-0-
-0-

  

  
  

  

 
 

1,527,328

33,527
23,636

  

  
  

  

 
 

1,872,428

458,602
358,636

  

  
  

 

(1)The amounts reported for 20102013 for Mr. Klueg reflect the incremental fair value of restricted stock units granted during the fiscal year in connection with the Option Exchange in accordance with FASBASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation(“ASC Topic 718”). This iswas not the value actually received. The actual value the Named Executive OfficersMr. Klueg may receive will depend on whether the time vesting criteria and/or performance criteria are met and, if so, the fair market value of our Holdings’ common stock at that time. The incremental fair value underASC Topic 718 was determined by calculating the fair value of the restricted stock units on October 18, 2010,21, 2013, the closing date of the Option Exchange, minus the fair value of the outstanding options on October 18, 2010. The fair value of each Named Executive Officer’s outstanding options on October 18, 2010, immediately preceding the Option Exchange was as follows: McCormack: $1,013,042; Madden: $473,475; Overbeeke: $268,158; Wilson: $552,568; and Schertel: $179,855.grant. The fair value of the restricted stock units received in connection with the Option Exchange was calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock units awarded by the fair market value of the restricted stock units on the date of the grant, immediately following the Option Exchange, assuming that the restricted stock units vest on satisfaction of the vesting condition described as the “Cypress Scenario” in Note 13. “Stock Incentive Plan – Restricted Stock Units” of our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Assuming the restricted stock units vest on satisfaction of the vesting condition described as the “IPO Scenario” in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, the fair market value of the restricted stock units would be increased and the incremental fair value amounts reported would change as follows: McCormack: $5,199,458; Madden: $1,390,275; Overbeeke: $5,944,342; Wilson: $3,174,932; and Schertel: $1,062,645.grant.
(2)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance withASC Topic 718 (excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures) with respect to stock options granted in 2008. As described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Option Exchange Program,” all stock options previously granted to our Named Executive Officers have been exchanged for restricted stock units.
(3)We report non-equity incentive plan compensation for the year in which such compensation is determined against annual performance metrics, regardless of whether it is paid in that year, or the following year, or is deferred under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Amounts for 2008 reflect payments made in September 2009, which payments were made following reinstatement of our previously canceled 2008 non-equity incentive compensation program.

(4)(3)The components of this column for 20102013 are detailed in the “Incremental Cost of Perquisites and Other Compensation Table” below.
(4)Mr. McCormack has notified the Board of his retirement effective March 31, 2014. Mr. Madden retired effective December 31, 2013.

(5)RepresentsMr. Klueg commenced employment with us on October 21, 2013 and his reported salary reflects the amountpro rata portion of Mr. Overbeeke’s signing bonus paidhis $325,000 annual salary earned in accordance with his letter agreement.fiscal 2013.
(6)ReflectsAmounts reported in the salary column reflect Mr. Schertel’s base salary ($335,390)300,232 for fiscal 2013) and an additional payment in respect of vacation ($25,057)39,867 for fiscal 2013) as required under Brazilian law. Amounts for Mr. Schertel reported in the salary column for 2008 have2011 has been converted from Brazilian Reals to U.S. Dollars at an exchange rate of .4279.53568 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real, which was the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2008 (with the exception of Mr. Schertel’s non-equity incentive plan compensation which was converted2011, for 2012 at a rate of .54697 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real), for 2009 at a rate of .5716.48940 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real, which was the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 20092012 and for 20102013 at a rate of .6020.4269 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real, which was the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2010.2013.

Incremental Cost of Perquisites and Other Compensation in 20102013 Table

 

Name and Principal Position

  Tax
Preparation
($)
   Vehicle
Allowance
($)
   Life
Insurance
Premium
($)
   401(k)
Basic
Contribution(1)

($)
   Tax
Gross-Up(2)
($)
   Deferred
Compensation
Matching
Contribution
($)(3)
   Other(4)
($)
   Total
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack

   1,640     18,000     1,872     7,350     1,954     69,233     2,751     102,800  

President and Chief Executive Officer

                

Thomas H. Madden

   340     15,000     864     7,350     28     26,573     -0-     50,155  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                

H. David Overbeeke

   2,500     18,000     1,215     7,350     27,340     15,599     62,019     134,023  

President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

                

Keith A. Wilson

   268     18,000     1,080     7,350     129     48,816     -0-     75,643  

President, Global Filtration Group

                

Jorge C. Schertel

   -0-     -0-     2,079     -0-     -0-     28,352     94,426     124,857  

President, Affinia Group S.A.

            

Name and Principal Position

 Tax
Preparation
($)
  Vehicle
Allowance
($)
  Life
Insurance
Premium
($)
  401(k)
Basic
Contribution(1)
($)
  Tax
Gross-
Up(2)
($)
  Deferred
Compensation
Matching
Contribution
($)(3)
  Other(4)
($)
  Total
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

  575    18,000    1,188    7,650    266    -0-    -0-    27,679  

Steven P. Klueg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  -0-    2,989    106    1,962    -0-    -0-    -0-    5,057  

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

  369    18,000    819    7,650    396    -0-    424    27,658  

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group S.A.

  -0-    -0-    2,529    -0-    -0-    -0-    73,707    76,236  

Steven E Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  1,250    15,000    549    7,650    611    -0-    -0-    25,060  

Thomas H. Madden
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  550    15,000    549    7,650    548    -0-    1,503,031    1,527,328  

 

(1)We contribute 3% of a U.S. employee’s earnings to the employee’s 401(k) account, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations.
(2)The amounts in this column constitute the tax gross-up expense incurred in respect of tax preparation costs shown in the table and, for Mr. Overbeeke,Wilson, the tax gross-up expense ($7,591) incurred in respect of health insurance costs and the tax gross-up expense ($18,705)212) incurred in respect of our reimbursement of certain spousal travel and living expenses shown in the “Other” column of the table and, for Mr. McCormack,Madden, the tax gross-up expense ($1,224)294) incurred in respect of our reimbursement of certain spousal travel expenses.
(3)Represents the amount of the matching contribution made by us in accordance with our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Matching contributions are reported for the year in which the non-equity incentive compensation, against which the applicable deferral election is applied, has been earned (regardless of whether such matching contribution is actually credited to the Named Executive Officer’s non-qualified deferred compensation account in that year or the following year). The amount ofFor fiscal 2013, the matching contribution we madeCompensation Committee determined to Mr. Schertel has been converted from Brazilian Reals to U.S. Dollars at an exchange rate of 0.60449 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real. All matching contributions are unvested and will vest as described in “— Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2010.”suspend our deferred compensation program.
(4)The amount in this column for Mr. McCormackWilson reflects certain spousal travel expenses ($424) reimbursed by us. The amount in this column for Mr. OverbeekeMadden reflects certain spousal travel expenses incurred($636) reimbursed by us, the payment we made pursuant to continue the Madden Letter Agreement ($900,000) and the separation payments ($585,206) and cost of health insurancecare coverage ($17,189) provided to Mr. Overbeeke maintained priorMadden pursuant to becoming our employee ($17,209) and our reimbursement of Mr. Overbeeke’s expenses incurred in commuting from his primary residence in Connecticut to our McHenry, IL offices and his living expenses while in McHenry, IL ($44,810).Employment Agreement. The amount in this column for Mr. Schertel is composed of a Brazilian government mandated severance fund payment in Mr. Schertel’s name ($28,836)26,762), a company contribution to a defined contribution plan on Mr. Schertel’s behalf ($39,509)37,837), a meal allowance at our cafeteria ($2,545)1,877), dues for a social club ($7,947) and reimbursement of operating costs for Mr. Schertel’s vehicle ($15,589)7,231).

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20102013 Table

 

     Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  All
Other
Stock

Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
Units
(#)
  All
Other
Option

Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
($)
  Exercise
or
Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Stock
and
Option
Awards(2)
($)
 

Name

 Grant Date  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
     

Terry R. McCormack

   81,250    650,000    1,137,500         

President and Chief Executive Officer

  Oct. 18, 2010        50,000    50,000       4,372,958  

Thomas H. Madden

   6,000    240,000    420,000         

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  Oct. 18, 2010        15,000    15,000       1,142,325  

H. David Overbeeke

   45,000    600,000    1,050,000         

President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

  Oct. 18. 2010        50,000    50,000       5,117,842  

Keith A. Wilson

   51,563    412,500    721,875         

President, Global Filtration Group

  Oct. 18, 2010        30,000    30,000       2,679,032  

Jorge C. Schertel

   20,962    167,695    293,466         

President,

           

Affinia Group S.A.

  Oct. 18, 2010        10,000    10,000       897,345  

(1)Reflects performance-based restricted stock units that were granted in connection with the Named Executive Officer’s election to participate in the Option Exchange (see “Compensation Discussion Analysis—Option Exchange Program” above).
(2)The amounts reported reflect the incremental fair value of restricted stock units granted during the fiscal year in connection with the Option Exchange in accordance withASC Topic 718. This is not the value actually received. The actual value the Named Executive Officers may receive will depend on whether the performance criteria are met and, if so, the fair market value of our Holdings’ common stock at that time. The incremental fair value underASC Topic 718 was determined by calculating the fair value of the restricted stock units on October 18, 2010, the closing date of the Option Exchange, minus the fair value of the outstanding options on October 18, 2010. The fair value of the restricted stock units received in connection with the Option Exchange was calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock units awarded by the fair market value of the restricted stock units on the date of the grant, immediately following the Option Exchange, assuming that the restricted stock units vest on satisfaction of the vesting condition described as the “Cypress Scenario” in Note 13. “Stock Incentive Plan – Restricted Stock Units” of our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
   Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 

Name

  Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

   0     747,000     1,494,000  

Steven P. Klueg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   0     52,333     104,666  

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

   0     515,000     1,030,000  

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group S.A.

   0     272,079     544,158  

Steven E. Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

   0     276,080     552,160  

Thomas H. Madden
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   0     276,080     552,160  

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20102013 Table

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

The Compensation Committee provides for non-equity incentive plan awards in the form of an annual cash incentive award plan. AmountsIn fiscal 2013, 100% of the amounts payable under this plan are a function ofwere based on our full-year adjusted EBITDA performance (either overallcompany consolidated or for specified business units), individual performance (taking into consideration, among other things, providing strategic leadership and direction, including with respectthe Compensation Committee’s discretion determined whether each Named Executive Officer’s target bonus opportunity would be reduced by up to corporate governance matters, and increasing operational efficiency) and, for Mr. Madden, also our achievement of business plan net expenses. Under the non-equity incentive plan, if EBITDA is above a specified level, then participants in the plan have the opportunity to earn cash incentive awards25% based on our (or a particular business unit’s) achievementthe Compensation Committee’s assessment of specified EBITDA performanceoverall working capital levels and overall debt levels. The plan establishes certain threshold performance levels for EBITDA, below which no cash incentive awardtarget bonus opportunity is payable. At the threshold performance levels, participants are entitled to payouts equal to 50% of their target cash incentive award opportunities (beingdetermined as a specified percentage of the Named Executive Officer’s base salary, ranging from 10% to 100% which, in the case of our Named Executive Officers, iswas 100% for Messrs. McCormack Overbeeke and Wilson, 80% for Mr.Messrs. Klueg, Madden, Keller and Schertel.

In fiscal 2013, for Messrs. McCormack, Madden and 50%Keller, our company consolidated adjusted EBITDA performance determined 100% of their target bonus opportunity, subject to reduction by up to 25% in the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on their assessment of working capital levels and overall debt levels. In fiscal 2013, for Messrs. Wilson and Schertel, the adjusted EBITDA performance of each of their respective business units determined 100% of their target bonus opportunity subject to reduction by up to 25% in the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on their assessment of working capital levels and debt levels. In fiscal 2013, for Mr. Schertel).Klueg, the adjusted EBITDA performance of our Filtration segment determined 100% of his target bonus opportunity, subject to reduction by up to 25% in the Compensation Committee’s discretion based on their assessment of working capital levels and debt levels.

Under the non-equity incentive plan, there are threshold, target and maximum performance levels that have been established for each of the relevant adjusted EBITDA performance goal components. If a performance level in excess of the threshold performance level for any adjusted EBITDA performance goal component is not achieved, no bonus is earned with respect to that component. At the threshold adjusted EBITDA performance levels, the Named Executive Officers are entitled to payouts equal to 0% of the weighting assigned to such component. At the target adjusted EBITDA performance level,levels, the participant would beNamed Executive Officers are entitled to a paymentpayouts equal to 100% of his target cash incentive award.the weighting assigned to their respective adjusted EBITDA performance component(s). Performance above the performance goal component target levellevels entitles a participantthe Named Executive Officers to an awardnon-equity incentive awards in excess of histheir target cash incentive award,bonus opportunity, up to a maximum of 175%200% of the target cash incentive award. Non-equity incentive plan awards forweighting assigned to their respective adjusted EBITDA performance component(s). For actual adjusted EBITDA performance results that fall between the specified performance levels, the payout percentages for the respective components are adjusted on a linear basis.

For fiscal 2013, the threshold, target and maximum company consolidated adjusted EBITDA performance levels were 188.0 million, 203.2 million, and 225.0 million, respectively. With respect to fiscal 2013, business unit and company consolidated adjusted EBITDA target performance levels were set at challenging levels, which required significant improvement over fiscal 2012 business unit performance. Threshold business unit adjusted EBITDA performance levels ranged from 5.6% to 48.8% above the reported 2012 EBITDA and maximum business unit adjusted EBITDA performance levels ranged from 22.9% to 114.9% above reported 2012 EBITDA . For fiscal 2013, actual company consolidated EBITDA performance was 187 million, which resulted in a weighting assigned to this performance component of zero percent.

The following table illustrates the operation of ourthe cash incentive award program for 2010:fiscal 2013:

 

     Percent of Bonus Opportunity     
        Percent of Bonus Opportunity       Bonus
Opportunity as
Percent of Salary
     Percent
Achieved/
 

Actual Dollar

Value Awarded
Based on Percent

Achieved

 

Name

  

Bonus

Opportunity as

Percent of Salary

and Dollar Value

  

Performance Factor

  Threshold Target Maximum Percent
Achieved
 Actual Dollar
Value  Awarded
Based on  Percent
Achieved
($)
   and Dollar Value Performance Factor  Threshold Target Maximum Reduced ($) 

Terry R. McCormack

  100% -$650,000  

Company EBITDA

   37.5  75  131.25  64.275  417,788    100% - $747,000 Company Adjusted
EBITDA
   0 100 200 0 -0-  
    

Individual Performance

   12.5  25  43.75  21.425  139,262  
              
          85.700  557,050  

H. David Overbeeke

  100% -$600,000  

Company EBITDA

   12.5  25  43.75  21.425  128,550  
    

Business Unit A EBITDA

   30.0  60  105.00  0.0  -0-  
    

Business Unit B EBITDA

   7.5  15  26.25  8.975  53,850  
    

Individual Performance

   —      —      —      —      -0-  
                 Working

Capital/Debt

Levels Reduction

     0 -0-  
          30.400  182,400          

 

  

 

 
         0  -0-  

Keith A. Wilson

  100% -$412,500  

Company EBITDA

   12.5  25  43.75  21.425  88,378    100% - $515,000       
    

Business Unit EBITDA

   37.5  75  131.25  116.575  480,872     Global Filtration
Adjusted EBITDA
   0  100  200  104.38  537,557  
    

Individual Performance

   —      —      —      —      -0-     Working

Capital/Debt

Levels Reduction

      0  -0-  
                      

 

  

 

 
          138.000  569,250           104.38  537,557  

Thomas H. Madden

  80% -$240,000  

Company EBITDA

   20.0  40.0  70.00  34.28  82,272    80% - $276,080 Company Adjusted
EBITDA
   0  100  200  0  -0-  
    

Business Unit A EBITDA

   9.0  18.0  31.50  0.0  -0-  
    

Business Unit B EBITDA

   10.0  20.0  35.00  31.08  74,592  
    

Business Unit C EBITDA

   3.5  7.0  12.25  4.19  10,056  
    

Business Unit D EBITDA

   2.5  5.0  8.75  7.55  18,120  
    

Business Plan Net Expenses

   5.0  10.0  17.50  15.70  37,680  
    

Individual Performance

   —      —      —      —      -0-  
                 Working

Capital/Debt

Levels Reduction

      0  -0-  
          92.80  222,720          

 

  

 

 
         0  -0-  

Jorge C. Schertel

  50% -$167,695  

Company EBITDA

   12.5  25  43.75  21.425  35,929    80% - $240,186       
    

Business Unit EBITDA

   37.5  75  131.25  113.275  189,956     Affinia Group

South America

Adjusted EBITDA

   0  100  200  113.33  272,203  
    

Individual Performance

   —      —      —      —      -0-     Working

Capital/Debt

Levels Reduction

      -25  (60,047
                    

 

  

 

 
          134.700  225,885           88.33  212,156  

Steven E. Keller

  80% - $276,080 Company Adjusted
EBITDA
   0  100  200  0  -0-  
   Working

Capital/Debt

Levels Reduction

      0  -0-  
        

 

  

 

 
         0  -0-  

        Percent of Bonus Opportunity       
   Bonus
Opportunity as
Percent of Salary
       Percent
Achieved/
  

Actual Dollar

Value Awarded
Based on Percent

Achieved

 

Name

  and Dollar Value Performance Factor  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Reduced  ($) 

Steven P. Klueg

  80% - $52,333 Company Adjusted

EBITDA

   0  100  200  104.38  54,625  
   Working

Capital/Debt
Levels Reduction

      0  -0-  
        

 

 

  

 

 

 
         104.38  54,625  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

The Compensation Committee grants equity incentive awards periodically, as and when appropriate in the Compensation Committee’s judgment. On July 20, 2005, we adopted the 2005 Stock Plan, which was subsequently amended on November 14, 2006, January 1, 2007, August 25, 2010 and December 2, 2010. The 2005 Stock Plan, as amended, permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to our employees, directors or consultants. The Compensation Committee has granted stock options, and restricted stock units and a stock award pursuant to the 2005 Stock Plan and has not granted any other stock-based awards.

Administration. The 2005 Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee; provided, that our Board may take any action designated to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has full power and authority to make, and to establish the terms and conditions of, any award and to waive any such terms and conditions at any time (including, without limitation, accelerating or waiving any vesting conditions or payment dates). The Compensation Committee is authorized to interpret the plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the plan and to make any other determinations that it, in good faith, deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the plan and may delegate such authority as it deems appropriate.

Options. The Compensation Committee determines the exercise price for each option; provided, however, that incentive stock options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date the option is granted. An option holder may exercise an option by written notice and payment of the exercise price (1) in cash or its equivalent, (2) by the surrender of a number of shares of common stock already owned by the option holder for at least six months (or such other period established by the Compensation Committee) with a fair market value equal to the exercise price, (3) if there is a public market for the shares, subject to rules established by the Compensation Committee, through the delivery of irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell shares obtained upon the exercise of the option and to deliver to Holdings an amount out of the proceeds of the sale equal to the aggregate exercise price for the shares being purchased or (4) by another method approved by the Compensation Committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee may grant stock appreciation rights independent of or in connection with an option. The exercise price per share of a stock appreciation right shall be an amount determined by the Compensation Committee provided that the exercise price is at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date the stock appreciation right is granted. Generally, each stock appreciation right shall entitle a participant upon exercise to an amount equal to (1) the excess of (a) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share of common stock over (b) the exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of common stock covered by the stock appreciation right. Payment shall be made in common stock or in cash, or partly in common stock and partly in cash, all as shall be determined by the Compensation Committee.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant awards of restricted stock units, rights to purchase stock, restricted stock and other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on the fair market value of, shares of common stock. The other stock-based awards will be subject to the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee.

Transferability. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, awards granted under the 2005 Stock Plan are not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Change of Control. In the event of a “change of control” (as defined in the 2005 Stock Plan), the Compensation Committee may provide for (1) the termination of an award upon the consummation of the change of control, but only if the award has vested and been paid out or the participant has been permitted to exercise an option in full for a period of not less than 30 days prior to the change of control, (2) the acceleration of all or any portion of an award, (3) payment in exchange for the cancellation of an award and/or (4) the issuance of substitute awards that would substantially preserve the terms of any awards.

Amendment and Termination. Our Board may amend, alter or discontinue the 2005 Stock Plan in any respect at any time, but no amendment may diminish any of the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.

Management or Director Stockholders Agreement. All shares issued under the 2005 Stock Plan will be subject to the management stockholders’ agreement or directors stockholders’ agreement, as applicable. The stockholders’ agreements impose restrictions on transfers of the shares by the individuals and also provide for various put and call rights with respect to the shares. Theseshares which put and call rights include the individual’s right to require that Holdings purchases the shares on death or disability at the then-fair market value of the shares and Holdings’ right to repurchase the shares upon specified events, including termination of service or employment, at a price equal to the then-fair market value or, in certain circumstances, at a price per share equal to the lesser of $100.00 and the then-fair market value.expired November 30, 2011. The individuals have also agreed to a 180-day lock up period (during which the sale of shares not covered by a registration statement is prohibited) in the case of an initial public offering of the shares and have been granted limited “piggyback” registration rights with respect to the shares. Certain individuals also entered into confidentiality and non-competition agreements in connection with the shares they purchased. The forms of the various agreements are referenced under “Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.” The forms of the agreements for directors are substantially similar to the forms for management.

Restrictive Covenant Agreement. Unless otherwise determined by our Board, all award recipients are obligated to sign our standard confidentiality, non-competition and proprietary information agreement, which includes restrictive covenants regarding confidentiality, proprietary information and a one-year period restricting competition and solicitation of our clients, customers or employees. If a participant breaches these restrictive covenants, the Compensation Committee has discretion to rescind any exercise of, or payment or delivery pursuant to, an award under the 2005 Stock Plan, in which case the participant may be required to pay to Holdings the amount of any gain realized in connection with, or as a result of, the rescinded exercise, payment or delivery.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20102013 Fiscal Year-End

 

   Stock Awards

Name

  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
   Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units  of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(1)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards;
Market
or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)

Terry R. McCormack

       50,000    7,816,500

President and Chief Executive Officer

        

Thomas H. Madden

       15,000    2,344,950

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

        

H. David Overbeeke

       50,000    7,816,500

President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

        

Keith A. Wilson

       30,000    4,689,900

President, Global Filtration Group

        

Jorge C. Schertel

       10,000    1,563,300

President, Affinia Group S.A.

        
   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(1)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards;
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

       -0-     -0-  

Thomas H. Madden
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

       -0-     -0-  

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

       42,372.88     5,741,102  

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group S.A.

       14,124.29     1,913,200  

Steven E. Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

       -0-     -0-  

Steven P. Klueg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

       14,124.29     1,914,689  

 

(1)As of December 31, 2010,2013, all outstanding equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Klueg) were in the form of performance-based restricted stock units granted pursuant to our 2005 Stock Plan in connection with the Option Exchange. The restricted stock units are subject to the vesting criteria described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Option Exchange Program.” The terms of Mr. Klueg’s grant of RSUs are summarized above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Letter Agreements.” In December 2013, we offered RSU holders having their principal place of employment in our Ann Arbor, Michigan corporate office (including Messrs. McCormack, Madden and Keller) the opportunity to convert their RSUs to cash for a payment equal to thirty percent of the anticipated value of such RSU holder’s RSUs upon the occurrence of a Vesting Event (as defined in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement). All such RSU holders, including Messrs. McCormack, Madden and Keller, accepted our offer. Each such RSU holder’s RSUs have been canceled. We are required to make payment to each such RSU holder with 30 days after their separation from service provided that no payment is required if the RSU holder voluntarily resigns or is terminated for “cause. In addition, for Messrs. Wilson, Schertel and Klueg, and the remaining RSU holders, in accordance with the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan, we have proportionally adjusted their respective RSU grants to reflect the economic impact of distributions made to Holdings’ shareholders in connection with our refinancing in April 2013 and the spin-off of our former brake products business.
(2)Because Holdings’ common stock is not publicly traded, the market value of the outstanding restricted stock units is based on the value of Holdings’ common stock as of December 31, 20102013 of $156.33.$135.56.
(3)Because Mr. Klueg has time-based RSUs and performance-based vesting RSUs, the market value of his outstanding restricted stock units is slightly different than Mr. Wilson and Mr. Schertel.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20102013

None of our Named Executive Officers exercisedheld any stock options in 2010,2013, nor havehad any of them received in 2013 any restricted stock, or other awards of shares of stock which have vested.

Pension Benefits for 20102013

We do not sponsor a defined benefit plan for our U.S. employees. However, we do offer a defined contribution (401(k)) plan for our U.S. employees pursuant to which we contribute 3% of an employee’s earnings, (which contributions were postponed for 2009 until October 1, 2009), all subject to applicable Internal Revenue Service limitations. We also maintain a defined contribution plan for certain of our employees in Brazil, including Mr. Schertel, pursuant to which we contribute 12.5% of Mr. Schertel’s base salary each year.

Although we maintain defined benefit plans for our employees in Canada, none of our Named Executive Officers participate in or are entitled to receive benefits pursuant to any defined benefit plan sponsored by us.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 20102013

On March 6, 2008, we adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation program pursuant to which certain of our senior employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are permitted to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual cash-based incentive awards which are then credited to the participant’s deferral account. The Company makes matching contributions of 25% of the amount of an employee’s deferral which vest on December 31 of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which such matching contributions were credited to an employee’s account. Employee deferrals and Company matching contributions are notionally invested under this plan in Holdings’ common stock, and once vesting of the Company matching contributions has occurred, distributions will be paid in the form of such shares of common stock (or cash, in certain circumstances) on the payment date elected by the participant or the participant’s separation from service (or the date that is six months following the date of such separation from service in the case of a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), if earlier. InUpon the retirement, death or disability of a participant or in the event a “change in control” (as defined in the non-qualified deferred compensation plan) or an initial public offering occurs prior to a participant’s separation from service, the participant will be fully vested in his or her entire account, including any unvested Company matching contributions.

In addition, in the event of a change in control, a participant’s entire account balance, including any unvested matching contributions that vest as a result of the change in control, will be distributed in a lump sum cash payment no later than thirty days following the date of the change in control.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions in
Last
Fiscal Year(1)
($)
  Registrant
Contributions in
Last
Fiscal Year(1) (2)
($)
  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last
Fiscal Year(3)
($)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last
Fiscal Year End(4)
($)
 Executive
Contributions in
Last
Fiscal Year(1)
($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last
Fiscal Year(1)
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last
Fiscal Year(2)
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(3)
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last
Fiscal Year End(4)
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

  276,932  69,233  162,479   -0-    775,588 -0-   -0-   4,512   475,763   643,013  

Thomas H. Madden
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  106,294  26,573  166,776   -0-    501,832 -0-   -0-   859   179,208   228,167  

H. David Overbeeke
President, Global Brake & Chassis Group

  62,396  15,599  32,021   -0-    162,626

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

  195,265  48,816  183,719   -0-    729,640 -0-   -0-   7,575   537,957   448,466  

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group, S.A.

  113,409  28,352  180,141   -0-    529,316 -0-   -0-   80   146,311   220,685  

Steven E. Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 -0-   -0-   4,150   117,549   170,079  

Steven P. Klueg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-  

 

(1)All executive contributions and registrant contributions reported in the non-qualified deferred compensation tableNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation in fiscal 2010.2013.
(2)Represents the amount of the matching contribution made by us in accordance with our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Matching contributions are reported for the year in which the non-equity incentive compensation, against which the applicable deferral election is applied, has been earned (regardless of whether such matching contribution is actually credited to the Named Executive Officer’s non-qualified deferred compensation account in that year or the following year). The amount of the matching contribution we made to Mr. Schertel has been converted from Brazilian Reals to U.S. Dollars at an exchange rate of 0.60449 U.S. Dollars for each Brazilian Real. All matching contributions are unvested and will vest as described above in “—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2010.”
(3)Aggregate earnings reflects the earnings on executive and registrant contributions based on the increasechange in value of Holdings’ common stock during 2010 or from the date of the contribution, as applicable.2013. The amounts reported are not considered compensation reportable in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)All distributions were paid in shares of Holdings’ common stock.
(4)Aggregate balance includes contributions made by the Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Keller who was not a Named Executive Officer prior to fiscal 2012 for years in which the deferred compensation program was in effect) in prior fiscal years and the matching contribution made by the Company in prior fiscal years which were reported in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years as follows: McCormack: $213,555$632,078 and $53,389,$158,020, respectively; Madden: $161,751$306,783 and $40,438, respectively; Overbeeke: $42,088 and $10,522,$76,695, respectively; Wilson: $241,472$542,560 and $60,368,$135,650 , respectively; Keller: $27,568 and $6,892, respectively; and Schertel: $165,931$301,768 and $41,483,$75,442, respectively.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Termination Provisions of Employment Agreements

Each of our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. OverbeekeKlueg and Mr. Schertel) has entered into an employment agreement with us. Under the employment agreements, and Mr. Overbeeke’s letter agreement, each Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Schertel) is entitled to the following payments and benefits in the event of a termination by us “without cause” (as defined in the employment agreements) or in the case of Messrs. McCormack, Wilson, Madden and Madden,Keller, by the executive for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreements) during the employment term: (1) subject to the executive’s compliance with the restrictive covenants described below, an amount equal to the “severance multiple” (2.0 for each of Messrs. McCormack Overbeeke and Wilson; 1.5 for Mr. Madden)Messrs. Madden and Keller) times the sum of base salary and the “average annual bonus” paid under the agreement for the preceding two years (the “Multiplier”), payable as follows: an amount equal to 1 times the Multiplier to be paid in equal monthly installments for 12 months following termination of employment and the balance to be paid in a lump sum on the first anniversary of the termination of the executive’s employment; (2) a pro-rata annual bonus for the year of termination; and (3) continued medical and dental coverage at our cost, on the same basis made available for active employees for a period of years corresponding with the severance multiple; provided that, if such coverage is not available for any portion of such period under our medical plans, we must arrange for alternate comparable coverage. In addition, if the executive (other than Mr. OverbeekeKlueg and Mr. Schertel) is terminated by us without cause or the executive resigns for good reason within two years following a change in control, the executive shall be entitled to a supplemental payment equal to the excess, if any, of (X) the product of the severance multiple times the executive’s target annual bonus, over (Y) the product of the severance multiple times the average annual bonus described above.

In addition, under the terms of the employment agreements, in the event the employment term ends due to election by either party not to extend the employment term, then the executive shall be entitled, subject to the executive’s compliance with the restrictive covenants described below, to (x) if we elect not to extend the employment term or, in the case of Messrs. McCormack and Wilson, if the executive elects not to extend the employment term, an amount equal to the “severance multiple” times the base salary, payable as follows: an amount equal to one times the base salary to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments following termination of employment and the balance to be paid in a lump sum on the first anniversary of the termination of the executive’s employment and (y) if, in the case of Mr.Messrs. Madden and Keller, the executive elects not to extend the employment term, an amount equal to one times the base salary paid in equal monthly installments over 12 months.

Each executive (including Mr. OverbeekeKlueg and Mr. Schertel) is restricted (either pursuant to their employment agreement or a separate agreement), for a period following termination of employment (24 months for Messrs. McCormack, Overbeeke and Wilson; 18 months for Mr.Messrs. Madden and Keller (or 12 months for Mr.Messrs. Madden and Keller if histheir employment agreement expires due to histheir election not to extend the term); 12 months for Mr. Klueg and Mr. Schertel), from (1) soliciting in competition certain of our customers, (2) competing with us or entering the employment or providing services to entities who compete with us or (3) soliciting or hiring our employees. The specific agreement containing these restrictions also provides that the Company may cease further payments and pursue its other rights and remedies in the event of a breach by the executive. Mr. Schertel’s contract containing the foregoing restrictions includes our agreement to pay him an amount equal to his annual base salary to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments if we terminate his employment without cause. The Klueg Letter Agreement includes our agreement to pay him an amount equal to his annual base salary to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments if we terminate his employment without cause.

Mr. Madden separated from service effective December 31, 2013. For purposes of Mr. Madden’s Employment Agreement, his separation from service was treated as a “termination without cause,” which entitled Mr. Madden to receive severance payments totaling $585,206 payable as described above and continued health care coverage for eighteen months ($17,189).

Total Potential Payout Assuming Termination Event Occurred on December 31, 20102013

 

    Termination by
Company Without
Cause or by
Executive
for Good Reason(1)
      Termination Due to
Non-Renewal of
Employment
Agreement
       

Name

 

  Benefit(2)

 Normally
($)
  After
Change in
Control
($)
   Termination
by Company
for Cause
($)
  By
Company
($)
  By
Executive
($)
  Voluntary
Resignation
by
Executive
($)
  Retirement,
Death or
Disability(3)
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack

 

•  Severance

  1,660,050    2,600,000     N/A    1,300,000    1,300,000    N/A    N/A  

President and Chief

Executive Officer

 

•    Continued health coverage

  20,860    20,860     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

•    2010 non-equity incentive plan payment

  557,050    557,050     557,050    557,050    557,050    557,050    557,050  
 

•    Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(4)

   53,389         53,389  
                              
 

Total

  2,237,960    3,231,299     557,050    1,857,050    1,857,050    557,050    610,439  

Thomas H. Madden

 

•    Severance

  702,495    810,000     N/A    450,000    300,000    N/A    N/A  

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial

Officer

 

•    Continued health coverage

  15,645    15,645     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

•    2010 non-equity incentive plan payment

  222,720    222,720     222,720    222,720    222,720    222,720    222,720  
 

•    Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(4)

   40,438         40,438  
                              
 

Total

  940,860    1,088,803     222,720    672,720    522,720    222,720    263,158  

H. David Overbeeke

 

•    Severance

  1,637,246    1,637,246     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

President, Global

Brake & Chassis

Group

 

•    Continued health coverage

  N/A    N/A     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

•    2010 non-equity incentive plan payment

  182,400    182,400     182,400    182,400    182,400    182,400    182,400  
 

•    Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(4)

   10,522         10,522  
                              
 

Total

  1,819,646    1,830,168     182,400    182,400    182,400    182,400    192,922  

Keith A. Wilson

 

•    Severance

  1,333,125    1,650,000     N/A    825,000    825,000    N/A    N/A  

President, Global

Filtration Group

 

•    Continued health coverage

  30,604    30,604     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

•    2010 non-equity incentive plan payment

  569,250    569,250     569,250    569,250    569,250    569,250    569,250  
 

•    Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(4)

   60,368         60,368  
                              
 

Total

  1,932,979    2,310,222     569,250    1,394,250    1,394,250    569,250    629,618  

Jorge C. Schertel

 

•    Severance

  360,447    360,447     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  

President,

Affinia Group S.A.

 

•    Continued health coverage

  N/A    N/A     N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
 

•    2010 non-equity incentive plan payment

  225,885    225,885     225,885    225,885    225,885    225,885    225,885  
 

•    Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(4)

   41,483         41,483  
                              
 

Total

  586,332    627,815     225,885    225,885    225,885    225,885    267,368  
      Termination by
Company Without
Cause or by
Executive
for Good Reason(1)
     Termination Due to
Non-Renewal of
Employment
Agreement
       

Name

 

Benefit

 Normally
($)
  After
Change in
Control
($)
  Termination
by Company
for Cause
($)
  By
Company
($)
  By
Executive
($)
  Voluntary
Resignation
by
Executive
($)
  Retirement,
Death or
Disability(3)
($)
 

Terry R. McCormack
President and Chief Executive Officer

  Severance  5,000,000    5,000,000    N/A    1,494,000    1,494,000    N/A    N/A  
  RSU payment  1,500,000    1,500,000    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    1,500,000  
  Continued health coverage  22,918    22,918    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(3)  0    34,848    0    0    0    0    34,848  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    6,522,918    6,557,766    0    1,494,000    1,494,000    0    1,534,848  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Keith A. Wilson
President, Global Filtration Group

  Severance  1,345,350    2,060,000    N/A    1,030,000    1,030,000    N/A    N/A  
  Continued health coverage  34,144    34,144    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(3)  0    25,184    0    0    0    0    25,184  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    1,379,494    2,119,328    0    1,030,000    1,030,000    0    25,184  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

      Termination by
Company Without
Cause or by
Executive
for Good Reason(1)
     Termination Due to
Non-Renewal of
Employment
Agreement
       

Name

 

Benefit

 Normally
($)
  After
Change in
Control
($)
  Termination
by Company
for Cause
($)
  By
Company
($)
  By
Executive
($)
  Voluntary
Resignation
by
Executive
($)
  Retirement,
Death or
Disability(3)
($)
 

Jorge C. Schertel
President, Affinia Group S.A.

  Severance  340,099    340,099    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Continued health coverage  N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(3)  0    5,736    0    0    0    0    5,736  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    340,099    345,835    0    0    0    0    5,736  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Steven E. Keller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  Severance  860,931    1,181,770    N/A    517,650    345,100    N/A    250,000  
  RSU payment  600,000    600,000    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    600,000  
  Continued health coverage  25,608    25,608    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(3)  0    6,866    0    0    0    0    6,866  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    1,486,539    1,814,244    0    517,650    345,100    0    856,866  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Steven P. Klueg
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  Severance  325,000    325,000    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Continued health coverage  17,072    17,072    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A  
  Accelerated vesting of matching contribution(3)  0    0    0    0    0    0    0  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    342,072    342,072    0    0    0    0    0  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)The ability of an executive to terminate for good reason applies only to Messrs. McCormack, Madden, Wilson and Wilson.Keller. Mr. McCormack’s May letter agreement modified the amounts to which he would be entitled in certain circumstances and reduced his outstanding RSUs by 50%. Subsequently Mr. McCormack entered into a letter agreement dated December 19, 2013, pursuant to which we agreed to acquire his remaining RSUs in exchange for a payment of $1.5 million.
(2)Amounts payable under our non-equity incentive plan (annual cash incentive plan) are earned on the last day of the applicable calendar year.
(3)Upon retirement, death or disability, the Named Executive Officer (or his estate) is entitled to receive any earned but unpaid cash incentive award plus a pro-rata portion of any annual cash incentive award that the Named Executive Officer would have earned had his employment not terminated. In addition, on death, each of our Named Executive Officer’s designated beneficiaries would be entitled to receive life insurance proceeds equal to 1.5 times the Named Executive Officer’s base salary (with the exception of Mr. Schertel whose life insurance policy has a face amount of $410,323)$501,739).
(4)(3)InAmounts do not include previously vested amounts under our deferred compensation plan. However, in accordance with the terms of our deferred compensation plan, any unvested matching contributions made by us will vest immediately upon the retirement, death or disability of the participant or upon any change-in-control or initial public offering of Holdings common stock.stock that occurs prior to a participant’s separation from service. If any of the foregoing events had occurred on December 31, 2010,2013, then our prior unvested matching contributions in the following amounts reflected in the table would have vested on such date: Mr. McCormack: $53,389; Mr. Madden: $40,438; Mr. Overbeeke: $10,522; Mr. Wilson: $60,368; and Mr. Schertel: $41,483.date. In addition, in the event of a change in control, a participant’s entire account balance, including any unvested matching contributions that vest as a result of the change in control, will be distributed in a lump sum cash payment no later than thirty days following the date of the change in control (see the amounts in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column in the non-qualified deferred compensation table above).

Director Compensation for 20102013

The annual retainer for non-management directors is $50,000.$75,000. The Chairman of the Board is paid an additional $15,000$325,000 annually. Mr. Riess, as Lead Director, is paid an additional $25,000 annually. The chair of our Audit Committee is paid an additional $50,000$125,000 annually in recognition of the Audit Committee chair’s expanded responsibilities as we implementresponsibilities. The Chair of our efforts to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley. Also,Compensation Committee and the Chair of our Nominating Committee each non-management director isare paid an additional $1,500 for each meeting of the Board attended and an additional $1,500 for each committee meeting attended.$10,000 annually.

Each of our non-management Directors has also been granted equity awards as part of their director compensation. Messrs. Finley, Morrison, Onorato, Parzick, Riess and Stern were previously granted options to purchase shares of Holdings’ common stock. On October 18, 2010 each of these Directors (other than Mr. Finley, who had previously exercised his options to purchase Holdings’ common stock) elected to exchange their existing options for restricted stock units with new performance-based vesting terms in connection with the Option Exchange. Mr. Finley received a grant of restricted stock units without having to exchange any options, all of which options were previously exercised. The restricted stock units are subject to the same vesting criteria as all other restricted stock units granted in connection with the Option Exchange (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Option Exchange Program”). The following table sets forth certain information concerning the options surrendered by, and the restricted stock units granted to, each of our non-employee Directors in connection with the Option Exchange.

Name

  Exchanged Options   Restricted Stock
Units
Received
 
  Number of
Shares
   Exercise
Price
   

Michael F. Finley

   0     N/A     2,500  

Donald J. Morrison

   1,000    $100     3,000  

Joseph A. Onorato

   2,000    $100     3,000  

Joseph E. Parzick

   1,000    $100     3,000  

John M. Riess

   2,000    $100     3,000  

James A. Stern

   1,000    $100     3,000  

The following table summarizes compensation for our non-employee directors for 2010.2013.

 

Name(1)

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards(2)
($)
 Option
Awards($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total
($)
   Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total
($)
 

Michael F. Finley

   72,500     269,300    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     341,800  

Larry W. McCurdy(3)

   37,000     -0-    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     37,000  

William M. Lasky

   75,000     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     75,000  

James S. McElya

   318,750     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     318,750  

Donald J. Morrison(4)(1)

   69,500     241,900    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     311,400     75,000     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     75,000  

Joseph A. Onorato

   125,500     160,640    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     286,140     181,250     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     181,250  

Joseph E. Parzick(3)

   60,500     241,900    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     302,400     42,500     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     42,500  

John M. Riess

   74,000     160,640    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     234,640     100,000     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     100,000  

James A. Stern

   62,000     241,900    -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     303,900     88,750     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     -0-     88,750  

 

(1)Mr. Finley resigned from our Board effective March 1, 2011. Mr. William M. Lasky and Mr. James S. McElya did not serve on our Board during 2010 and earned no fees or other compensation from the Company.
(2)Other than with respect to Mr. Finley, the amounts reported for 2010 reflect the incremental fair value of restricted stock units granted during the fiscal year in connection with the Option Exchange in accordance with FASBASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation(“ASC Topic 718”). Amount reported for Mr. Finley for 2010 reflects the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted to him on October 18, 2010 in connection with the Option Exchange in accordance withASC Topic 718. These are not the values actually received. The actual value Directors may receive will depend on whether the performance criteria are met and, if so, the fair market value of Holdings’ common stock at that time. The incremental fair value underASC Topic 718 was determined by calculating the fair value of the restricted stock units on October 18, 2010, the closing date of the Option Exchange, minus the fair value of the outstanding options on October 18, 2010. The fair value of each Director’s (other than Mr. Finley, who had previously exercised his options to purchase Holdings common stock) outstanding options on October 18, 2010, immediately preceding the Option Exchange was as follows: Morrison: $81,260; Onorato: $162,520; Parzick: $81,260; Riess: $162,520; and Stern: $81,260. The fair value of the restricted stock units received in connection with the Option Exchange was calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock units awarded by the fair market value of the restricted stock units on the date of the grant, immediately following the Option Exchange, assuming that the restricted stock units vest on satisfaction of the vesting condition described as the “Cypress Scenario” in Note 13. “Stock Incentive Plan – Restricted Stock Units” of our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Assuming the restricted stock units vest on satisfaction of the vesting condition described as the “IPO Scenario” in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, the fair market value of the restricted stock units would be increased and the incremental fair value amounts (or, with respect to Mr. Finley, the grant date fair value) reported would change as follows: Finley: $310,625; Morrison: $291,490; Onorato: $210,230; Parzick: $291,490; Riess: $210,230; and Stern: $291,490.

(3)Mr. McCurdy served as a Director on our Board in 2010 and until his death on August 3, 2010.
(4)Mr. Morrison’s fees were paid directly to his employer in accordance with his employer’s policies regarding employee participation on boards of directors of the employer’s investment portfolio companies. Mr. Morrison’s
(2)As of December 31, 2013, Messrs. Lasky, McElya, Morrison, Onorato, Parzick, Riess, and Stern each held 2,119, 2,119, 4,237, 4,237, 4,237, 4,237, 4,237 unvested restricted stock units, wererespectively. The restricted stock units are subject to the same vesting criteria as all other Restricted Stock Units granted directly to his employer in accordanceconnection with his employer’s policies regarding employee participation on boardsthe option exchange. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Option Exchange Program.”
(3)Mr. Parzick resigned from our Board of directors of the employer’s investment portfolio companies.Directors effective May 31, 2013.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2010,2013, or at any other time, one of our officers or employees or had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under any paragraph of Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or Board of Directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Compensation Committee or Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our annual report on Form 10-K.

The Compensation Committee

James A. Stern, Chairman

James S. McElya

Joseph A. Onorato

John M. Riess

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

(a) Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information about our common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010,2013, including the 2005 Stock Plan (a description of which may be found above under the heading “Equity Incentive Plan Awards”).

 

Plan Category

  Number of
securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
   Number of
securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   N/A    N/A    N/A     N/A   N/A   N/A  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

   293,192(1)  $100.00(2)   56,808(3)    247,543(1)  $62.87(2)   80,230(3) 
            

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   293,192   $100.00    56,808     247,543   $62.87    80,230  

 

(1)Consists of 34,06223,355 shares of Holding’s common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 239,000205,508 shares of Holdings’ common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units awarded under the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive (the “2005 Stock Plan”).Plan. Also includes 19,96718,517 shares of Holdings’ common stock that may be issued under the Affinia Group Senior Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Award Plan and 163 shares that were issued as a stock award.
(2)Weighted-average exercise price does not include restricted stock units or shares issuablethat may be issued under the Affinia Group Senior Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Award Plan, which by their nature do not have an exercise price.

(3)Consists of shares of Holdings’ common stock issuable under the 2005 Stock Plan pursuant to various awards the compensation committee of the Board of Directors may make, including non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation” for a description of the 2005 Stock Plan.

(b) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Affinia Group Holdings Inc. owns 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. owns 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Affinia Group Inc.

The following table and accompanying footnotes show information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. as of March 11, 201131, 2014 by (1) each person known by us, based on information available to us, to beneficially own more than 5% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc., (2) each of our directors and nominees, (3) each named executive officer and (4) all directors and executive officers as a group.

The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Unless otherwise indicated below, each beneficial owner named in the table below has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated shares of common stock. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each beneficial owner is 1101 Technology Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108.

 

Names and addresses of beneficial owner

  Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
 Percentage of
Class
   Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
 Percentage of
Class
 

The Cypress Group L.L.C.

   2,175,000 (2)   61.1   2,175,000(2)  60.8

The address of each of the Cypress Funds and Cypress Side-By-Side L.L.C. is c/o The Cypress Group L.L.C., 437 Madison Avenue, 33rd Floor, New York, NY 10022

      

OMERS Administration Corporation

   700,000    19.7   700,000   19.6

The address of OMERS Administration Corporation is c/o Omers Capital, Royal Bank Plaza, South Tower, 200 Bay Street, Suite 2010, Box 6, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2J2.

      

The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company

   400,000    11.2��  400,000   11.2

The address of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is 720 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202.

      

California State Teachers’ Retirement System

   200,000    5.6   200,000   5.6

The address of California State Teachers’ Retirement System is 7667 Folsom Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95826.

   

The address of California State Teachers’ Retirement System is 100 Waterfront Place, West Sacramento, CA 95605.

   

Common Stock Ownership

 

Name of beneficial owner

  Common
Stock
Owned
   Common
Stock
Acquirable
in 60 days
   Total 

Lasky

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

McElya

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Morrison

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Onorato

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Parzick

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Riess

   250.00     -0-     250.00  

Stern

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

McCormack

   1,500.00     -0-     1,500.00  

Madden

   750.00     -0-     750.00  

Wilson

   550.00     -0-     550.00  

Schertel

   250.00     -0-     250.00  

Overbeeke

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Keller

   500.00     -0-     500.00  

Zorn

   250.00     -0-     250.00  

Mehall

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Manning

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

All Directors and Executive officers*

   4,050.00     -0-     4,050.00  

Common Stock Ownership

 

Name of beneficial owner

  Common
Stock
Owned
   Common
Stock
Acquirable
in 60 days
   Total 

Lasky

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

McElya

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Morrison

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Onorato

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Parzick

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Riess

   250     -0-     250  

Stern

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

McCormack

   5,856     -0-     5,856  

Madden

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Wilson

   4,298     -0-     4,298  

Schertel

   3,189     -0-     3,189  

Pizarek

   315     -0-     315  

Keller

   2,088     -0-     2,088  

Zorn

   1,547     -0-     1,547  

Quick

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

Manning

   -0-     -0-     -0-  

All Directors and Executive officers*

   17,543     -0-     17,543  

 

*The executive officers or members of the Board of Directors of Affinia Group Inc. currently hold 0.1138%0.4904% of shares of the outstanding common stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. The amount of ownership for each Named Executive Officer or member of the Board is shown above and each of the executive officers or members of the Board own less than 1.0% of outstanding shares.
(1)Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 3,558,4633,577,672 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 11, 201131, 2014 plus, as to any person, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by such person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights.
(2)Includes 2,063,038 shares of common stock owned by Cypress Merchant Banking Partners II L.P., 87,703 shares of common stock owned by Cypress Merchant Banking II C.V., 19,909 shares of common stock owned by 55th Street Partners II L.P. (collectively, the “Cypress Funds”) and 4,350 shares of common stock owned by Cypress Side-by-Side LLC. Cypress Associates II L.L.C. is the managing general partner of Cypress Merchant Banking II C.V. and the general partner of Cypress Merchant Banking Partners II L.P. and 55th Street Partners II L.P., and has voting and investment power over the shares held or controlled by each of these funds. Certain executives of The Cypress Group L.L.C., including Messrs. Jeffrey Hughes and James Stern, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares shown as beneficially owned by the Cypress Funds. Each of such individuals disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. Cypress Side-By-Side L.L.C. is a sole member-L.L.C. of which Mr. James Stern is the sole member.

The following table and accompanying footnotes show information regarding the beneficial ownership of the preferred stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. as of March 11, 2011 by (1) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the issued and outstanding preferred stock of Affinia Group Holdings Inc., (2) each of our directors and nominees, (3) each named executive officer and (4) all directors and executive officers as a group. The preferred stock was issued at $1,000 per share and, among other things, is convertible to common stock at a conversion price of $100 per share and earns a dividend of 9.5% per annum. A complete description of the rights of preferred stockholders may be found in the certificate of designations on file with the Delaware Secretary of State.

Names and addresses of beneficial owner

  Nature and
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
   Percentage
of Class
 

The Cypress Group L.L.C.

   49,684     77.745

The address of each of the Cypress Funds and Cypress Side-By-Side L.L.C. is c/o The Cypress Group L.L.C., 437 Madison Avenue, 33rd Floor, New York, NY 10022.

    

OMERS Administration Corporation

   12,421     19.436

The address of OMERS Administration Corporation is c/o Omers Capital, Royal Bank Plaza, South Tower, 200 Bay Street, Suite 2010, Box 6, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2J2.

    

Name of Individual or Identity of Group

    

Terry R. McCormack

   124     0.194

Thomas H. Madden

   124     0.194

H. David Overbeeke

   93     0.146

Keith A. Wilson

   31     0.049

John M. Riess

   31     0.049

All executive officers and directors as a group

   403     0.632

(1)Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 63,906 shares of preferred stock outstanding as of March 11, 2011.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions and Director Independence

Director Independence

The members of our Board of Directors are James A. Stern, William M. Lasky, Terry R. McCormack, James S. McElya, Donald J. Morrison, Joseph A. Onorato Joseph E. Parzick and John M. Riess. Though not formally considered by our Board of Directors, given that our securities are not registered or traded on any national securities exchange, based upon the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, we do not believe that Mr. Stern Mr. McCormack or Mr. ParzickMcCormack would be considered independent either because they serve as members of our management team or because of their relationships with various Cypress funds or certain affiliates of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. or other entities that hold significant interests in Affinia Group Holdings Inc. We do believe that Mr. Lasky, Mr. McElya, Mr. Morrison, Mr. Onorato and Mr. Riess would qualify as “independent” based on the New York Stock Exchange’s director independence standards for listed companies.

Investor Stockholders Agreement

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated as of November 30, 2004,2012, among Affinia Group Holdings Inc., various Cypress funds, OMERS, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Stockwell Fund, L.P., the number of directors serving on the Board of Directors will be no less than seven and no more than eleven. The Stockholders Agreement entitles Cypress to designate three directors. Cypress has currently appointed Mr. Stern, Mr. Parzick and Mr. McElya. As long as OMERS members own at least 50 percent in the aggregate of the number of shares owned by them on November 30, 2004, OMERS is entitled to designate one director, who currently is Mr. Morrison. Cypress is entitled to designate three directors who are not affiliated with any of the parties to the Stockholders Agreement, who currently are Mr. Lasky, Mr. Onorato and Mr. Riess. Additionally, the Stockholders Agreement entitles the individual serving as CEO, currently Mr. McCormack, and another individual serving as one of our senior officers, currently vacant, to seats on the Board of Directors. The Stockholders Agreement also provides that the nominating committee of the Board of Directors may from time to time select two additional individuals who must be independent to serve as Directors.

Other Related Person Transactions

We describe below the transactions that have occurred since the beginning of fiscal 2010,2013, and any currently proposed transactions, that involve the Company or a subsidiary and exceed $120,000, and in which a related party had or has a direct or indirect material interest.

Mr. John M. Riess, a Board member, is the parent of J. Michael Riess, who is currently employed with Genuine Parts Company (NAPA) as president of a distribution facility. NAPA is the Company’s largest customer as a percentage of total net sales from continuing operations. NAPA accounted for $519$279 million, $523$287 million and $535$299 million which represented 27%, 29% and 27% of our total net sales from continuing operations, which represented 22%, 23% and 22% of our total net sales from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 20092011, 2012 and 2010,2013, respectively.

Effective JanuaryJuly 1, 2011,2012, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., entered into an amendment to the Advisory Agreement with Torque Capital Group LLC for services related to corporate strategy, finance, investments and such other services as we may request from time to time. Mr. Joseph E. Parzick, one of our former directors, is a managing partner of Torque Capital Group LLC. In connection with theThe Advisory Agreement we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., have agreedwas amended to change the expiration date of the obligation to pay athe quarterly fee of $400,000 for six calendar quarters expiringfrom June 30, 2012 and have further agreed to pay a success fee of up to $3.0 million inMarch 31, 2013. In accordance with the event Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s shareholders realize a specified return on their investment. A copyterms of the Advisory Agreement, is attached as an Exhibit hereto.

Effective January 1, 2011, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., entered into an Advisory Agreement with Cypress Advisors, Inc. for services related to corporate strategy, finance, investments and such other services as we may request from time to time. Mr. James A. Stern, one of our directors, is a managing director of Cypress Advisors, Inc. In connection with the Advisory Agreement, we, along with Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Affinia Group Inc., have agreedCompany terminated its obligation to pay athe quarterly fee of $100,000 for six calendar quarters expiring June 30, 2012, and have further agreed to pay a success fee of up to
$2.0 million in the event Affinia Group Holdings Inc.’s shareholders realize a specified return on their investment. A copy of the Advisory Agreement is attached as an Exhibit hereto.effective December 31, 2012.

Related Person Transactions Policy

Our Board has adopted a written statement of policy for the evaluation of and the approval, disapproval and monitoring of transactions involving us and “related persons.” For the purposes of the policy, “related persons” include our executive officers, directors and director nominees or their immediate family members, or stockholders owning five percent or more of our outstanding common stock.

Our related person transactions policy requires:

 

that any transaction in which a related person has a material direct or indirect interest and which exceeds $120,000, such transaction referred to as a “related person transaction,” and any material amendment or modification to a related person transaction, be evaluated and approved or ratified by our Audit Committee or by the disinterested members of the Audit Committee; and

 

that any employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer and any related compensation solely resulting from that employment relationship or transaction must be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board or recommended by the Compensation Committee to the Board for its approval.

In connection with the review and approval or ratification of a related person transaction:

 

management must disclose to the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Audit Committee, as applicable, the material terms of the related person transaction, including the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction, and all the material facts as to the related person’s direct or indirect interest in, or relationship to, the related person transaction;

 

management must advise the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Audit Committee, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction complies with the terms of our agreements governing our material outstanding indebtedness;

 

management must advise the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Audit Committee, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction complies with the terms of our agreements governing our material outstanding indebtedness;

management must advise the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Audit Committee, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction will be required to be disclosed in our SEC filings. To the extent it is required to be disclosed, management must ensure that the related person transaction is disclosed in accordance with SEC rules; and

 

management must advise the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Audit Committee, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction constitutes a “personal loan” for purposes of Section 402 of Sarbanes-Oxley.

In addition, the related person transaction policy provides that the Audit Committee, in connection with any approval or ratification of a related person transaction involving a non-employee director or director nominee, should consider whether such transaction would compromise the director or director nominee’s status as an “independent,” “outside,” or “non-employee” director, as applicable, under the rules and regulations of the SEC, The New York Stock Exchange and the Code. Subsequent to the adoption of the written procedures above, the Company has followed these procedures regarding all reportable related person transactions.

Item 14.Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

For services rendered in 20092012 and 20102013 by Deloitte and& Touche LLP, our independent public accounting firm, we incurred the following fees:

 

  2009   2010   2012   2013 

Audit Fees (1)

  $3.8    $3.6    $2.8    $2.0  

Tax Fees (2)

  $1.0    $0.5    $2.7    $1.0  

All Other Fees (3)

  $1.6    $0.4  

Other Fees (3)

  $7.0    $0.2  

 

(1)Represents fees incurred for the annualsannual audits of the consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of interim financial statements, statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries and SEC registration statements.
(2)Represents fees incurred for U.S. and foreign income tax compliance, acquisition and disposition related tax services and state tax planning services.
(3)Represents fees primarily incurred for services related to acquisitions, carve-out audits, dispositions and other professional services.

The Audit Committee, as required by its Charter, approves in advance any audit or permitted non-audit engagement or relationship between the Company and the Company’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy which provides that the Company’s independent auditors are only permitted to provide services to the Company that have been specifically approved by the Audit Committee or entered into pursuant to the pre-approval provisions of the Policy. All tax services to be performed by the independent auditors that fall within certain categories and certain designated dollar thresholds have been pre-approved under the Policy. All tax services that exceed the dollar thresholds and any other services must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also has delegated approval authority, subject to certain dollar limitations, to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who is an independent director. Pursuant to this delegation, the Chairman is required to present at each scheduled meeting, and as of the date of this report has presented, all approval decisions to the full Audit Committee.

PART IV.

 

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

 1.Financial Statements:

See Item 8 above.

 

 2.Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is summarized below for the period ending December 31, 2008,2011, December 31, 2009,2012, and December 31, 2010:2013:

 

(Dollars in millions)  Balance
at beginning
of period
   Amounts
charged to
income
   Trade
accounts
receivable
“written
off”
net of
recoveries
  Adjustments
arising  from
change  in
currency
exchange
rates and
other items
  Balance at
end of
period
 

Year ended December 31, 2008

  $4    $1    $(1 $—     $4  

Year ended December 31, 2009

  $4    $4    $(4 $(1 $3  

Year ended December 31, 2010

  $3    $—      $—     $(1 $2  
(Dollars in millions)  Balance
at beginning
of period
   Amounts
charged to
income
   Trade
accounts
receivable
“written
off”
net of
recoveries
  Adjustments
arising from
change in
currency
exchange
rates and
other items
  Balance at
end of
period
 

Year ended December 31, 2011

  $2    $1    $—    $(2 $1  

Year ended December 31, 2012(1)

  $1    $2    $(1 $1   $3  

Year ended December 31, 2013

  $3    $2    $(2 $(1 $2  

(1)The allowance for doubtful accounts excludes less than $1 million reserve as of December 31, 2013, which is classified in the current assets of discontinued operations.

All other financial statement schedules are not required under the relevant instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

 

 3.Exhibits

The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

Exhibit
Number

  

Description of Exhibit

3.5  Certificate of Incorporation of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.5 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.
3.6  By-laws of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.6 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.
4.1  Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2004,April 25, 2013, among Affinia Group Inc., the Guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, Company,National Association, as Trustee,trustee, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-48-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.May 1, 2013.
4.4  4.2  9%Form of 7.750% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, Rule 144A Global Note Due 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.1), which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement4.1 on Form S-48-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.May 1, 2013.
4.5  4.3  9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, Regulation S Global Note,Credit Agreement, dated April 25, 2013, among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.5 of the Registration Statement4.3 on Form S-410-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.August 9, 2013.
4.6  4.4  Registration RightsGuarantee and Collateral Agreement, with respect to 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014dated April 25, 2013 among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., the Company, the Guarantorssubsidiary loan parties identified therein and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as representative of the initial purchasers named therein, dated December 9, 2010,administrative agent and collateral agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on December 15, 2010.May 1, 2013.
4.7  4.5  Indenture,ABL Credit Agreement, dated August 13, 2009,April 25, 2013, among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., certain subsidiaries party thereto, the Company, the Guarantorslenders party thereto and Wilmington Trust FSB,Bank of America, N.A., as trustee and noteholder collateraladministrative agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.14.5 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on August 19, 2009.May 1, 2013.
4.8  4.6  FormGuarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated April 25, 2013, among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., the subsidiary loan parties identified therein and Bank of 10.75% Senior Secured Note Due 2016,America, N.A., as administrative agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.24.6 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on August 19, 2009.May 1, 2013.
10.9#  Affinia Group Senior Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Award Plan, dated as of March 6, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.9 on Form 10-K/A of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 14, 2008.
10.10Settlement Agreement dated as of November 20, 2007 by and between Dana Corporation and Affinia Group Inc. , which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.10 on Form 10-K/A of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 14, 2008.
10.11  Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2004, among Affinia Group Holdings Inc., various Cypress funds, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Stockwell Fund, L.P., which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.10 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.
10.12*10.11  Amendment to Stockholders Agreement, dated January 24, 2005, among Affinia Group Holdings Inc., various Cypress funds, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Stockwell Fund, L.P., which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 11, 2011.
10.13#10.12#  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Terry R. McCormack, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 6, 2009.
10.14#10.13#  Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Terry R. McCormack, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.24 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.
10.14#Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2012, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Terry R. McCormack, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.14 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 18, 2013.

Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

10.15#  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Keith A. Wilson, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.13 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 6, 2009.
10.16#  Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Keith A. Wilson, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.25 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.

Exhibit
Number

10.17#
  

DescriptionAmendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2012, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Keith A. Wilson, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.17 on Form 10-K of Exhibit

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 18, 2013.
10.17#10.18#  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Thomas H. Madden, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.15 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 6, 2009.
10.18#10.19#  Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Thomas H. Madden, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.23 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.
10.19#10.20#Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2012, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Thomas H. Madden, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.20 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 18, 2013.
10.21#  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2008, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Steven E. Keller, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.16 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 6, 2009.
10.20#10.22#  Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Steven E. Keller, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.22 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.
10.21#10.23#Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2012, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and Steven E. Keller, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.23 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 18, 2013.
10.24#  Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan amended as of November 14, 2006 and January 1, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.18 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 6, 2009.
10.22#10.25#  Amendment to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, dated August 25, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.28 on Form 10-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed November 12, 2010.
10.23#*10.26#  Amendment to Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, dated December 2, 2010.2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.23 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 11, 2011.
10.24#10.27#  Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.17 of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on September 8, 2005.
10.2510.28  Form of Management Stockholder’s Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.11 of Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on November 22, 2010.
10.2610.29  Form of Sale Participation Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 of Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on November 22, 2010.
10.2710.30  Form of Supplemental Agreement to the Management Stockholder’s Agreement and the Sale Participation Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.26 on Form 10-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on November 12, 2010.

Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

10.2810.31  Form of Management Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Proprietary Information Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.27 on Form 10-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on November 12, 2010.
10.2910.32  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.29 of Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on November 22, 2010.
10.3010.33#  Shares TransferLetter Agreement with Terry R. McCormack, dated as of June 30, 2008, between Zhang Haibo and Affinia Group Inc.,May 31, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K10-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on July 2, 2008.August 9, 2013.
10.3110.34#  Shareholders’Letter Agreement with Steven Klueg, dated October 31, 2008, among Zhang Haibo, Affinia Acquisition LLC and HBM Investment Limited,11, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.14 of the Registration Statement10.48 on Form S-110-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on June 25, 2010.November 8, 2013.
10.3210.35#  ABL CreditLetter Agreement with Steven E. Keller, dated August 13, 2009,January 8, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 on the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.
10.33Omnibus Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated September 15, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.16 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.
10.34Second Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated March 8, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.17 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on August 12, 2010.

Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

10.35Third Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated November 30, 2010, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.01 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. filed on December 6, 2010.
10.36Collateral Agreement, dated August 13, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, and Wilmington Trust FSB, as collateral agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.499.1 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on August 19, 2009.January 14, 2014.
10.3710.36#  U.S. SecurityLetter Agreement with Terry R. McCormack, dated August 13, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent,December 19, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.599.2 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on August 19, 2009.January 14, 2014.
10.3810.37#  Lien Subordination and IntercreditorLetter Agreement with Thomas H. Madden, dated August 13, 2009, among the Company, the Guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent and Wilmington Trust FSB, as noteholder collateral agent,December 19, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.699.3 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on August 19, 2009.January 14, 2014.
10.3910.38  Agreement between Brake Parts Inc. and Klarius Group Limited and Bank of America, N.A.S. dated February 2, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on February 8, 2010.
10.40*10.39Omnibus Fourth Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement and Other Credit Documents, dated as of May 22, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8 of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on May 29, 2012.
10.40Fifth Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated November 30, 2012, among Parent, the Company, certain of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries, certain of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and the other agents party thereto, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.40 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 18, 2013.
10.41Limited Waiver to Lien Subordination Agreement and Inter creditor Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 4.2 on Form 10-Q of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on November 13, 2012.

Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

  10.42  Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, among Affinia Group Inc., Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Cypress Advisors, Inc., which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.40 on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 11, 2011.
10.41*  10.43  Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, among Affinia Group Inc., Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Holdings Inc. and Torque Capital Group LLC.

LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
Number

Description 10.41 on Form 10-K of Exhibit

Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed on March 11, 2011.
  10.44Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 21, 2014, by and between Affinia Group Inc. and VSC Quest Acquisition LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. filed January 22, 2014.
  10.45*First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 4, 2014, among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.
  10.46*First Amendment to ABL Credit Agreement, dated February 4, 2014, among Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc., Affinia Group Inc., certain subsidiaries party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent.
21.1*  List of Subsidiaries.
31.1*  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*  Certification of Terry R. McCormack, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, and Thomas H. Madden,Steven P. Klueg, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

*filed herewith
#management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

AFFINIA GROUP INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS INC.
By: 

/S/ TERRY R. MCCCORMACKCORMACK        

 Terry R. McCormack
 

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal

Executive Officer)

Date: March 11, 201131, 2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 11, 2011.31, 2014.

 

   

Signature

  

Title

By:

/S/    TERRY R. MCCORMACK        

Terry R. McCormack

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:

/S/    THOMAS H. MADDEN        

Thomas H. Madden

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

By:

/S/    THOMAS H. MADDEN        

Thomas H. Madden

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

By:  

/s/    James A. Stern        S/ TERRY R. MCCORMACK

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Terry R. McCormack(Principal Executive Officer)
By:

James A. Stern/S/ STEVEN P. KLUEG

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Steven P. Klueg(Principal Financial Officer)
By:

/S/ SCOT S. BOWIE

Chief Accounting Officer
Scot S. Bowie(Principal Accounting Officer)
By:

/S/ JAMES S. MCELYA

  Chairman of the Board of Directors
By:James S. McElya  

/s/    William M. Lasky        

William M. Lasky

Director
By:  

/s/    James S. McElya          

James S. McElyaS/ WILLIAM M. LASKY

  Director
By:William M. Lasky  

/S/    DONALD J. MORRISON        

Donald J. Morrison

Director
By:

/S/    JOSEPH A. ONORATO        

Joseph A. Onorato

Director
By:  

/s/    Joseph E. Parzick        

Joseph E. ParzickS/ DONALD J. MORRISON

  Director
Donald J. Morrison
By:  

/S/    JOHN M. RIESS        

John M. RiessS/ JOSEPH A. ONORATO

  Director
Joseph A. Onorato
By:

/S/ JOHN M. RIESS

Director
John M. Reiss
By:

/S/ JAMES A. STERN

Director
James A. Stern

 

121123