UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

December 31, 2011 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102011

or

For the Transition Period from            to            .

Commission file number 333-154975000-54376

TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(949) 833-8252

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NoneCommon Stock, $0.01 par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There is no established trading market for the registrant’s common stock and therefore the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates cannot be determined. There were approximately 1,300,9573,345,201 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2010,2011, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of March 25, 2011,26, 2012, there were 2,732,5897,718,646 outstanding shares of common stock of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference (solely to the extent explicitly indicated) from the TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement for the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL TRUST, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Factors whichThe following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could have a material adverse effect oncause our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

i

All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included herein could be inaccurate, and undue reliance should not be placed upon on any forward-looking statements included herein. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed herein will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made after the date of this Annual Report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward looking statements included in this Annual Report, including, without limitation, the risks described under “Risk Factors,”in Part I, Item 1A, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Annual Report will be achieved.

iii

PART I

Overview

TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on September 18, 2008 to invest in and manage a portfolio of income producing retail properties, located primarily in the Western United States, and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. The Company hasWe have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to the CompanyTNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc., and, as required by context, TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as our “operating partnership,” and to their subsidiaries. References to “shares” and “our common stock” refer to the shares of our common stock. We own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through our operating partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.

On November 4, 2008, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to offer a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to the public in our primary offering and 10,526,316 shares of our common stock to stockholders pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. On August 7, 2009, the SEC declared our registration statement effective and we commenced our initial public offering. We are initially offering shares of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain purchasers, and to our stockholders pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a price of $9.50 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, we sold 1,880,2653,625,969 shares in our initial public offering, for gross offering proceeds of $18,604,000, which includes 29,06584,045 shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, forresulting in gross offering proceeds of $276,000.$36,185,000. From the commencement of the offering through December 31, 2010,2011, we sold 2,390,0175,969,507 shares in our initial public offering, for gross proceedsnet of $23,613,000,share redemptions, which includes 29,780112,283 shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, forresulting in gross offering proceeds of $283,000.$59,248,000. As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had redeemed 30,20028,779 shares pursuant to our share redemption program for $302,000.$287,000. For more information on shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program, see Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer of Equity Securities — Securities—Share Redemption Program.”

On May 26, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of Pinehurst Square East, a retail property located in Bismarck, North Dakota, or the Pinehurst Property, our operating partnership issued 287,472 units of common limited partnership interests, or Common Units, to certain of the sellers of the Pinehurst Property who elected to receive Common Units for an aggregate value of approximately $2,587,249, or $9.00 per Common Unit.

We intend to invest in a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, primarily located in the Western United States, including neighborhood, community and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties. In addition to investments in real estate directly or through joint ventures, we may also acquire or originate first mortgages or second mortgages, mezzanine loans or other real estate-related loans, which we refer to collectively as “real estate-related loans,” in each case provided that the underlying real estate meets our criteria for direct investment. We may also invest in any other real property or other real estate-related assets that, in the opinion of our board of directors, meets our investment objectives and is in the best interests of our stockholders.

As of December 31, 2010,2011, our portfolio included fourthe eleven properties below, which we refer to as “our properties” or “our portfolio,” comprising an aggregate of 408,0001,131,000 square feet of single- and multi-tenant, commercial retail space located in three states. These properties consistnine states, which we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of Moreno Marketplace, or the Moreno Property, located in Moreno Valley, CA, Waianae Mall, or the Waianae Property, located in Oahu, HI, Northgate Plaza, or the Northgate Property, located in Tucson, AZ, and San Jacinto Esplanade, or the San Jacinto Property, located in San Jacinto, CA. $155,261,000.

Cochran Bypass		Chester, South Carolina
Topaz Marketplace		Hesperia, California
Constitution Trail Shopping Center		Normal, Illinois
Osceola Village		Kissimmee, Florida
Summit Point Shopping Center		Fayetteville, Georgia

See Item 2, “Properties” for additional information on our portfolio.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, our external advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement. We refer to TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC as our “advisor.” Our advisor conducts our operations and manages our portfolio of real estate investments. We have no paid employees.

TNP Securities, LLC, an affiliate of theour advisor, serves as our dealer manager for our initial public offering. We refer to TNP Securities, LLC as “TNP Securities” or our “dealer manager.”

Our office is located at 1900 Main Street, Suite 700, Irvine, California 92614, and our main telephone number is (949) 833-8252.

Investment Objectives

Our investment objectives are:are to:

Investment Strategy

We intend to use proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to continue to acquire a diverse portfolio of retail properties, primarily located in large metropolitan areas in the Western United States, including neighborhood, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties, with a focus on properties located in or near residential areas that have, or have the ability to attract, strong anchor tenants.

We intend to diversify our portfolio by geographic region within the Western United States, investment size and investment risk with the goal of attaining a portfolio of income-producing properties that provide attractive and stable returns to our investors. We focus on markets where affiliates of our advisor have an established market presence, knowledge and access to potential investments, as well as an ability to direct property management and leasing operations efficiently. We review and adjust our target markets periodically to respond to changing market opportunities and to maintain a diverse portfolio of retail properties. We also intend to diversify our portfolio of retail properties by investment size. We expect that our investments will typically range in size from $10 million to $100 million. We may, however, make investments outside of this range if we believe the property will complement our portfolio or meet our investment objectives.

In addition to direct investments in retail properties, we also plan to originate or acquire real estate-related loans that meet our underlying criteria for direct investment. The specific number and mix of real estate-related loans in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, particularly with respect to retail properties, the amount of proceeds we raise in our initial public offering, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing, and compliance with the terms of certain agreements, including, without limitation, our revolving credit facility with KeyBank, National Association, or KeyBank, which contains certain restrictions on our investments. We may also invest in other real estate assets or real estate related assets that we believe meet our investment objectives.

Borrowing Policies

We use, and intend to use in the future, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of real property, securities and real estate-related loans.loans, and other real estate related assets. Our targeted property portfolio debt level is 50% of the fair market value of our assets once we have invested substantial proceeds raised in our ongoing public offering. In order to facilitate investments in the early stages of our operations before we have acquired a substantial portfolio

of income-generating investment properties, we have in the past, and expect to in the future, borrow in excess of our long-term targeted debt level. By operating on a leveraged basis, we expect that we will have more funds available for investments. This will generally allow us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, potentially resulting in enhanced investment returns and a more diversified portfolio. However, our use of leverage increases the risk of default on loan payments and the resulting foreclosure on a particular asset. In addition, lenders may have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of the indebtedness. When debt financing is unattractive due to high interest rates or other reasons, or when financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain assets for cash with the intention of obtaining debt financing at a later time. If we do not obtain loans on our properties, however, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted and we may not be able to diversify our portfolio.

Under our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, which we refer to as our “charter,” we have a limitation on borrowing which precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets. Net assets for purposes of this calculation is defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. The preceding calculation is generally expected to approximate 75% of the aggregate cost of our assets before non-cash reserves and depreciation. However, our charter allows us to temporarily borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with an explanation for such excess. As of December 31, 2010,2011, our borrowings exceeded the 300% limit due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were incurredacquired with the acquisition of our properties. Because these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and because our overall indebtedness is 67%was less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2011, this excess borrowing has been approved by our board ofindependent directors.

Our advisor uses its best efforts to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us and will seek to refinance assets during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of any such refinancing may include increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.

Our charter restricts us from obtaining loans from any of our directors, our advisor and any of our affiliates unless such loan is approved by a majority of the directors, including a majority of the independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties. Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, are reviewed by the board of directors at least quarterly.

As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had indebtedness of approximately $39,164,000,$112,395,000, or 67%66.0 % of the book value of our assets. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 7 (Notes Payable) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information on our outstanding indebtedness.

Economic Dependency

We are dependent on our advisor and the dealer manager for certain services that are essential to us, including the sale of our shares of common stock in our ongoing initial public offering; the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase and disposition of properties and other investments; management of the daily operations of our real estate portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that our advisor or dealer manager is unable to provide its respective services, we will be required to obtain such services from other sources. We may not identify replacements for our advisor or dealer manager in a timely manner, if at all, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Competition

We are subject to significant competition in seeking real estate investments and tenants. We compete with many third parties engaged in real estate investment activities, including other REITs, other real estate limited partnerships, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, hedge funds, governmental bodies, and other entities. Some of our competitors may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have and may have substantially more operating experience than us. Additionally, duringsince 2009, and 2010, disruptions and dislocations in the credit markets materially impacted the cost and availability of debt to finance real estate acquisitions, which is a key component of our acquisition strategy. Recently, creditMore recently, debt financing has become increasingly available on more favorable terms.easier to obtain. However, there is no guarantee this trend will continue or that we will be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. Lack of available financing could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage for other entities that have greater financial resources than we do. All of the above factors could result in delays in the investment of proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Tax Status

We elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. We believe that we operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on our taxable income that is currently distributed to our stockholders, provided that distributions to our stockholders equal at least 90% of our taxable income, subject to certain adjustments. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year without the benefit of certain relief provisions, we will be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates. We may also be subject to certain state or local income taxes, or franchise taxes.

Regulations and Environmental Matters

As an owner of real estate, our investments are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We intend to obtain all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments and do not believe that compliance with existing laws will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest, or on properties that may be acquired directly or indirectly in the future.

Employees

We have no employees. The employees of our advisor or its affiliates provide management, acquisition, advisory and certain administrative services for us.

Financial Information About Industry Segments

Our current business consists of owning, managing, operating, leasing, acquiring, developing, investing in, and disposing of real estate assets. We internally evaluate all of our real estate assets as one industry segment, and, accordingly, we do not report segment information.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and, as a result, file our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains our annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information we file electronically with the SEC. Access to these filings is free of charge on the SEC’s website as well as our website (www.tnpsrtreit.com).

The following are some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business.

We have a limited operating history and there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve our investment objectives.

We commenced operations on November 19, 2009 with the acquisition of our first real estate asset. As a result, we have a limited operating history and may not be able to successfully operate our business or achieve our investment objectives. An investment in our shares of common stock may therefore entail more risk than an investment in the shares of common stock of a real estate investment trustREIT with a substantial operating history. In addition, you should not rely on the past performance of prior programs managed or sponsored by Thompson National Properties, LLC, or TNP, or our sponsor, or its affiliates to predict our future results. Our investment strategy and key employees differ from the investment strategies and key employees of these prior programs.

There is no trading market for shares of our common stock and we are not required to effectuate a liquidity event by a certain date. As a result, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares of common stock and, if you are able to sell your shares, you are likely to sell them at a substantial discount.

There is no current public market for the shares of our common stock and we have no obligation to list our shares on any public securities market or provide any other type of liquidity to our stockholders. It will therefore be difficult for you to sell your shares of common stock promptly or at all. Even if you are able to sell your shares of common stock, the absence of a public market may cause the price received for any shares of our common stock sold to be less than what you paid or less than your proportionate value of the assets we own. We have adopted a share redemption program but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares that may be purchased each quarter. Additionally, our charter does not require that we consummate a transaction to provide liquidity to stockholders on any date certain or at all. As a result, you should purchase shares of our common stock only as a long-term investment, and you must be prepared to hold your shares for an indefinite length of time.

You may be more likely to sustain a loss on your investment because our sponsor does not have as strong an economic incentive to avoid losses as does a sponsor who has made significant equity investments in its company.

Thompson National Properties, LLC, ourOur sponsor has invested $200,000 in us through the purchase of 22,222 shares of our common stock and our chief executive officer, Anthony W. Thompson, currently our largest shareholder, has purchased, directly or indirectly, 133,333 shares of our common stock, at $9.00 per share. Therefore, if we are successful in raising enough proceeds to be able to reimburse our sponsor for our significant organization and offering expenses, our sponsor will have little exposure to loss in the value of our shares. Without this exposure, our investors may be at a greater risk of loss because our sponsor may have less to lose from a decrease in the value of our shares as does a sponsor that makes more significant equity investments in its company.

Our sponsor has operated at a significant loss since inception and because we are dependent upon our advisor and its affiliates, including our sponsor, to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of our advisor or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and the return on our stockholders’ investment.

We are dependent on our advisor to manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. Our advisor depends on the capital from our sponsor and fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of assets and on our sponsor to conduct its operations. Our sponsor has a limited operating history and, since inception, has operated at a significant loss. Our sponsor also has substantial secured and unsecured debt obligations coming due over the next 4 years. To the extent that our sponsor is unable to negotiate a modification to its debt obligations or our sponsor’s financial condition does not improve or deteriorates, it may adversely impact our advisor’s ability to perform its duties to us or could have an adverse effect on our operations and cause the value of your investment to decrease. Moreover, such adverse conditions could require a substantial amount of time on the part of our advisor and its affiliates, thereby decreasing the amount of time they spend actively managing our investments. Any adverse changes in the financial condition of our advisor or our sponsor or our relationship with them could hinder our advisor’s ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. If our sponsor and its affiliates, including our advisor, are unable to provide services to us we may spend substantial resources in identifying non-affiliated service providers to provide advisory and dealer manager functions.

Our ability to successfully conduct our initial public offering is dependent, in part, on the ability of our dealer manager to successfully establish, operate and maintain a network of broker-dealers.

OtherOur dealer manager is an affiliate of our sponsor and other than serving as dealer manager for our initial public offering, our dealer managerit has no experience acting as a dealer manager for a public offering. The success of our initial public offering, and correspondingly our ability to implement our business strategy, is dependent upon the ability of our dealer manager to establish and maintain a network of licensed securities brokers-dealers and other agents. If our dealer manager fails to perform, we may not be able to raise adequate proceeds through our initial public offering to implement our investment strategy. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our investment strategy, you could lose all or a part of your investment.

The loss of or the inability to obtain key real estate professionals at our advisor could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could limit our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of an investment in our shares.

Our ability to make distributions and achieve our investment objectives is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition, disposition and management of real properties and other real estate-related assets, the selection of tenants for our real properties and the determination of any financing arrangements. In addition, our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain of the key personnel of our sponsor, including Anthony W. Thompson and James R. Wolford, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We currently do not have key man life insurance on Anthony W. Thompson or James R. Wolford. Neither we nor our affiliates have employment agreements with Messrs. Thompson or Wolford and Messrs. Thompson and Wolford may not remain associated with us. If these persons were to cease their association with us, our operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our advisor’s and its affiliates’ ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing

professionals. Competition for such professionals is intense, and our advisor and its affiliates may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled individuals. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of our stockholders’ investments may decline.

All of our cash distributions to date have been made from proceeds from our public offering. Distributions are not guaranteed, may fluctuate, and may constitute a return of capital or taxable gain from the sale or exchange of property.

On August 13, 2009, ourOur board of directors has approved a monthly cash distribution of $0.05625 per common share, which represents an annualized distribution of $0.675 per share if paid each day over a 365-day period. On May 11, 2010, our board of directors approved an increase in our monthly cash distribution to $0.05833 per share of common stock, which represents an annualized distribution of $0.70 per share if paid each day over a 365-day period. There is no guarantee that we will pay distributions at this rate in the future or at all.

The actual amount and timing of distributions will be determined by our board of directors and typically will depend upon, among other things, the amount of funds available for distribution, which will depend on items such as current and projected cash requirements and tax considerations. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time. Our long-term strategy is to fund the payment of monthly distributions to our stockholders entirely from our funds from operations. However, during the early stages of our operations, we may need to borrow funds, request that our advisor, in its discretion, defer its receipt of fees and reimbursement of expenses or to the extent necessary, utilize offering proceeds in order to make cash distributions. All of our cash distributions since our inception have been made from proceeds from our initial public offering. We have not established a limit on the amount of proceeds from our public offering that may be used to fund distributions. Accordingly, the amount of distributions paid at any given time may not reflect current cash flow from operations. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, all distributions were funded from offering proceeds. Because we had a taxable loss for the year, all distributions represented a return of capital.

In the event that we are unable to consistently fund monthly distributions to our stockholders entirely from our funds from operations, the value of your shares upon a listing of our common stock, the sale of our assets or any other liquidity event may be reduced. Further, if the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year exceeds the amount of our “REIT taxable income” generated during the year, the excess amount will either be (1) a return of capital or (2) gain from the sale or exchange of property to the extent that a stockholder’s basis in our common stock equals or is reduced to zero as the result of our current or prior year distributions. In addition, to the extent we make distributions to stockholders with sources other than funds from operations, the amount of cash that is distributed from such sources will limit the amount of investments that we can make, which will in turn negatively impact our ability to achieve our investment objectives and limit our ability to make future distributions. Subsequent investors may experience immediate dilution in their investment because a portion of our net assets may have been used to fund distributions instead of retained in our company and used to make investments.

To date, all of our cash distributions declared and paid have been made from offering proceeds and constituted a return of capital.

Because the funds from the operation of our business have not been sufficient to cover our distributions, to date, we have paid all of our cash distributions from the proceeds of our public offering. Therefore, you should not consider our distribution as a measure of the cash flow generated by our business and you should not consider the distributions as a reflection of the quality of our investments. If we are unable to raise additional proceeds from our public offering and cannot borrow funds for this purpose, our distributions would cease.

Generally, distributions paid using offering proceeds will constitute a return of capital, which means a return of all or a portion of your original investment. To date, we have paid all of our distributions from the proceeds of our public offering and our distributions have constituted a return of capital. To the extent our distributions are funded from offering proceeds, we will have less funds to use for investments. Additionally, distributions that are treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes generally will not be taxable as a dividend to a stockholder, but will reduce the stockholder’s basis in its shares (but not below zero) and therefore can result in the stockholder having a higher gain upon a subsequent sale of such shares. Return of capital distributions in excess of a stockholder’s basis generally will be treated as gain from the sale of such shares.

We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition of our investments and the determination of any financing arrangements as well as the performance of our property manager in the selection of tenants and the negotiation of leases. The current market for properties that meet our investment objectives is highly competitive, as is the leasing market for such properties. The more shares we sell in our public offering, the greater our challenge will be to invest all of the net offering proceeds on attractive terms.

You must rely entirely on the oversight of our board of directors, the management ability of our advisor and the performance of the property manager. We cannot be sure that our advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms. Additionally, we could suffer from delays in locating suitable investments as a result of our reliance on our advisor at times when management of our advisor is simultaneously seeking to locate suitable investments for other programs sponsored by our sponsor and its affiliates, some of which have investment objectives and employ investment strategies that are similar to ours.

As a public company, we are subject to the ongoing reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the Exchange Act, we may be required to file with the SEC financial statements of properties we acquire or, in certain cases, financial statements of the tenants of the acquired properties. To the extent any required financial statements are not available or cannot be obtained, we will not be able to acquire the property. As a result, we may not be able to acquire certain properties that otherwise would be a suitable investment. We could suffer delays in our property acquisitions due to these reporting requirements.

Delays we encounter in the selection and acquisition of properties could adversely affect your returns. In addition, ifIf we are unable to invest our offering proceeds in properties in a timely manner, we will hold the offering proceeds in an interest-bearing account, invest the proceeds in short-term investments or, ultimately, liquidate. In such an event, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and the returns to our stockholders would be adversely affected.

Investors who invest in us at the beginning of our public offering may realize a lower rate of return than later investors.

Because we have acquired only foureleven properties, we have not yet generated sufficient cash flow to fund the payment of distributions. Investors who invest in us before we commence significant real estate operations and generate significant cash flow may realize a lower rate of return than later investors. Until such time as we have sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund the payment of distributions, some or all of our distributions will be paid from other sources, such as from the proceeds of the offering or future offerings, cash advances to us by our advisor, cash resulting from a waiver of fees by our advisor, and borrowings, including borrowings secured by our assets, in anticipation of future operating cash flow. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, all distributions were funded from offering proceeds. Because we had a taxable loss for the year, all distributions to our stockholders represented a return of capital.

Investors who invest later in our public offering may realize a lower rate of return than investors who invest earlier in the offering to the extent we fund distributions out of sources other than operating cash flow.

To the extent we incur debt to fund distributions earlier in the offering, the amount of cash available for distributions in future periods will be decreased by the repayment of such debt. Similarly, ifbecause to date we usehave used offering proceeds to fund distributions, later investors may experience immediate dilution in their investment because a portion of our net assets would have been used to fund distributions instead of being retained and used to make real estate investments. Earlier investors will benefit from the investments made with funds raised later in the offering, while later investors maywill not share in all of the net offering proceeds raised from earlier investors.

We may have to make decisions on whether to invest in certain properties without detailed information on the property.

To effectively compete for the acquisition of properties and other investments, our advisor and board of directors may be required to make decisions or post substantial non-refundable deposits prior to the completion of our analysis and due diligence on property acquisitions. In such cases, the information available to our advisor and board of directors at the time of making any particular investment decision, including the decision to pay any non-refundable deposit and the decision to consummate any particular acquisition, may be limited, and our advisor and board of directors may not have access to detailed information regarding any particular investment property, such as physical characteristics, environmental matters, zoning regulations or other local conditions affecting the investment property. Therefore, no assurance can be given that our advisor and board of directors will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment. In addition, our advisor and board of directors expect to rely upon independent consultants in connection with their evaluation of proposed investment properties, and no assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such independent consultants.

Our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a transaction providing liquidity for our stockholders until 2015. There can be no assurance that we will effect a liquidity event within such time or at all. If we do not effect a liquidity event, it will be very difficult for you to have liquidity for your investment in shares of our common stock.

In the future, our board of directors will consider various forms of liquidity events, including, but not limited to, (1) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets for cash or other consideration, (2) our sale or merger in a transaction that provides our stockholders with cash and/or shares of a publicly traded company and (3) the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. Our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a transaction providing liquidity for our stockholders until 2015. There can be no assurance that we will cause a liquidity event to occur at such time or at all. If we do not effect a liquidity event, it will be very difficult for you to have liquidity for your investment in shares of our common stock other than limited liquidity through our share redemption program.

Payment of fees to our advisor and its affiliates reduces cash available for investment, which may result in our stockholders not receiving a full return of their invested capital.

Because a portion of the offering price from the sale of our shares is used to pay expenses and fees, the full offering price paid by stockholders will not be invested in real properties and other real estate-related assets. As a result, stockholders will only receive a full return of their invested capital if we either (1) we sell our assets or our company for a sufficient amount in excess of the original purchase price of our assets or (2) the market value of our company after we listedlist our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange is substantially in excess of the original purchase price of our assets.

If we internalize our management functions, your interest in us could be diluted and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed.

Our board of directors may decide in the future to internalize our management functions. If we do so, we may elect to negotiate to acquire our advisor’s assets and personnel. At this time, we cannot anticipate the form or amount of consideration or other terms relating to any such acquisition. Such consideration could take many forms, including cash payments, promissory notes and shares of our common stock. The payment of such consideration could result in dilution of your interests as a stockholder and could reduce the earnings per share and funds from operations per share attributable to your investment.

Additionally, while we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we pay to our advisor under the advisory agreement, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and compliance. We would also be required to employ personnel and would be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances as well as incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that will bewere being paid by our advisor or its affiliates. We may issue equity awards to officers, employees and consultants, which awards would decrease net income and funds from operations and may further dilute your investment. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor we would save or the costs we would incur if we became self-managed. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our advisor, our earnings per share and funds from operations per share would be lower as a result of the internalization than it otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders and the value of our shares.

Internalization transactions involving the acquisition of advisors or property managers affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in properties or other investments or to pay distributions.

If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity. Currently, our advisor and its affiliates perform asset management and general and administrative functions, including accounting and financial reporting, for multiple entities. These personnel have substantial know-how and experience which provides us with economies of scale. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could thus result in our incurring excess costs and suffering deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs, and our management’s attention could be diverted from most effectively managing our real properties and other real estate-related assets.

You are limited in your ability to sell your shares of common stock pursuant to our share redemption program. You may not be able to sell any of your shares of our common stock back to us, and if you do sell your shares, you may not receive the price you paid upon subscription.

Our share redemption program may provide you with an opportunity to have your shares of common stock redeemed by us. We anticipate that shares of our common stock may be redeemed on a quarterly basis. However, our share redemption program contains certain restrictions and limitations, including those relating to the number of shares of our common stock that we can redeem at any given time and limiting the redemption price. Specifically, we presently intend to limit the number of shares to be redeemed during any calendar year to no more than (1) 5.0%5% of the weighted average of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year and (2) those that could be funded from the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan in the prior calendar year plus such additional funds as may be borrowed or reserved for that purpose by our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors reserves the right to reject any redemption request for any reason or no reason or to amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time. Therefore, you may not have the opportunity to make a redemption request prior to a potential termination of the share redemption program and you may not be able to sell any of your shares of common stock back to us pursuant to our share redemption program. Moreover, if you do sell your shares of common stock back to us pursuant to the share redemption program, you may not receive the same price you paid for any shares of our common stock being redeemed.

Payments to the holder of the special units may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of our shares of common stock upon consummation of a liquidity event.

As the holder of the special units of our operating partnership, TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our sponsor, may be entitled to receive a cash payment upon dispositions of our operating partnership’s assets and a promissory note, cash or shares of our common stock upon the occurrence of specified events, including, among other events, a listing of our shares on an exchange or the termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement. Payments to the holder of the special units upon dispositions of our operating partnership’s assets and redemptions of the special units may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of shares of our common stock upon consummation of a liquidity event.

Our initial public offering is a fixed price offering. We established the fixed offering price of our shares on an arbitrary basis and it may not accurately represent the current value of our assets at any particular time. Therefore, the purchase price paid for shares of our common stock may be higher or lower than the value of our assets per share of our common stock at the time of the purchase.

Our initial public offering is a fixed price offering, which means that the offering price for shares of our common stock is fixed and will not vary based on the underlying value of our assets, at any time.unless our board of directors determines that the offering price should be modified. Our board of directors arbitrarily determined the offering price in its sole discretion. The fixed offering price for shares of our common stock has not been based on appraisals of any assets we may own nor do we currently intend to obtain appraisals for purposes of determining the share price.own. Therefore, the fixed offering price established for shares of our common stock may not accurately represent the current value of our assets per share of our common stock at any particular time and may be higher or lower than the actual value of our assets per share at such time.

We will not calculate theOur board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.14 for our shares of common stock until 18 months after completionas of our offering stage. Therefore, you willDecember 31, 2011. You should not be able to determine the true value of your sharesrely on an on-going basis during our initial public offering.

We do not intend to calculate the estimated value per share as being an accurate measure of the current value of our shares of common stock or in making an investment decision.

On March 16, 2012, our board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.14 for our shares duringcommon stock as of December 31, 2011. We did not, however, change the price per share in our public offering, under our distribution reinvestment program or under our share redemption program, except in the case of death or disability, in which case we will use the higher of the most recent estimated share value and therefore, youthe purchase price paid. We disclose in our filings with the SEC the methodology used to determine the estimated value per share and numerous limitations related to the estimated value per share. Please see our filings with the SEC for a detailed description of the estimated share valuation methodology and limitations.

We currently anticipate that the estimated value per share will be calculated quarterly through the quarter ending June 30, 2012. However, our board of directors may determine to update such estimate more frequently. Our board’s objective in determining the estimated value per share was to arrive at a value, based on the most recent data available, that it believed was reasonable based on methodologies that it deemed appropriate after consultation with our advisor and after reviewing, among other factors, appraisal reports of our properties prepared by third parties. However, the market for commercial real estate can fluctuate quickly and substantially and values are expected to change in the future and may decrease. Also, our board of directors did not consider certain other factors, such as a liquidity discount.

As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used to determine the estimated value per share were based upon a number of assumptions, estimates and judgments that may not be accurate or complete. Further, different parties using different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated value per share, which could be significantly different from the estimated value per share determined by our board of directors. The estimated value per share does not represent the fair value of our assets less liabilities in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The estimated value per share is not a representation or indication that: a stockholder would be able to determinerealize the estimated share value if he or she attempts to sell shares; a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to the estimated value per share upon liquidation of assets and settlement of our liabilities or upon a sale of our company; shares of our common stock would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange; a third party would offer the estimated value per share in an arms-length transaction to purchase all or substantially all of our shares on an on-going basis. Beginningof common stock; or the methodologies used to estimate the value per share would be acceptable to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, or under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, with respect to their respective requirements.

Under current FINRA regulations, beginning 18 months after the completion of the last offering of our shares and prior to any listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, which we refer to as our offering stage, our board of directors will determine the estimated per share value of our shares of common stock based on independent valuations of our properties and other assets.assets every 18 months.

Risks Related To Our Business

Changing laws and regulations have resulted in increased compliance costs for us, which could affect our operating results.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and newly enacted SEC regulations, have created, and may create in the future, additional compliance requirements for companies such as ours. For instance, our advisor may be required to register as an investment advisor under federal or state regulations which will subject it to additional compliance procedures and reporting obligations as well as potential penalties for non-compliance. As a result of such additional regulation, we intend to invest appropriate resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment has resulted and will likely continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Our success is dependent on the performance of our sponsor and its affiliates and our sponsor’s financial condition.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions is dependent upon the performance of our advisor, our sponsor and its affiliates. Our sponsor and affiliates are sensitive to trends in the general economy, as well as the commercial real estate and credit markets. The recent macroeconomic downturn and accompanying credit crisis has negatively impacted the value of commercial real estate assets, contributing to a general slowdown in the real estate industry. A limited economic recovery or future economic slowdown could have an adverse impact on our sponsor and its affiliates and could impact certain prior real estate programs sponsored by our sponsor. To the extent that any decline in revenues and operating results impacts the performance of our advisor, sponsor or its affiliates, the management of our day-to-day operations could be adversely impacted and our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders could also suffer.

Additionally, as a recently formed company, our sponsor does not have the financial resources other more established sponsors may have available. Our sponsor does not currently have a substantial net worth and is operating at a net loss. To the extent that our sponsor’s financial condition does not improve or deteriorates, it may adversely impact our advisor’s ability to perform its duties to us pursuant to the advisory agreement which does not improve or could have an adverse effect on our operations and cause the value of your investment to decrease. Moreover, such adverse conditions could require a substantial amount of time on the part of our advisor and its affiliates, thereby decreasing the amount of time they spend actively managing our investments.

If we are delayed or unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives.

Delays in selecting, acquiring and developing real properties could adversely affect investor returns. Because we are conducting our initial public offering on a “best efforts” basis over time, our ability to commit to purchase specific assets will depend, in part, on the amount of proceeds we have received at a given time. As of March 25, 2011, we have raised approximately $26,973,000 in gross offering proceeds in our initial public offering and have acquired four multi-tenant properties. If we are unable to access sufficient capital, we may suffer from delays in making additional suitable investments.

Events in U.S. and global financial markets have had, and may continue to have, a negative impact on the terms and availability of credit in the United States and the state of the national economy generally which could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

The failure of large U.S. financial institutions in 2008 and 2009 and the resulting turmoil in the United Statesglobal financial sector has had, and will likely continue to have, a negative impact on the terms and availability of credit and the state of the economy generally within the United States. The tightening of the U.S. credit markets has resulted in fears of a lack of adequate credit and the risk of a further economic downturn. Some lenders continue to impose more stringent restrictions on the terms of credit and there may be a general reduction in the amount of credit available in the markets in which we conduct business. The negative impact of the tightening of the credit markets may result in an inability to finance the acquisition of real properties and other real estate-related assets on favorable terms, if at all, increased financing costs or financing with increasingly restrictive covenants. If the credit markets remain constricted, it may result in our inability to obtain adequate financing or to refinance debt obligations as they come due on favorable terms, or at all.

Additionally, decreasing home prices and mortgage defaults have resulted in uncertainty in the real estate and real estate securities and debt markets. As a result, the valuation of real estate-related assets has been volatile and is likely to continue to be volatile in the future. The volatility in markets may make it more difficult for us to obtain adequate financing or realize gains on our investments which could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

We are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire real properties or other real estate-related assets and fund or expand our operations will be adversely affected.

The net proceeds from our initial public offering will be used primarily to fund our investment in real properties and other real estate-related assets, for payment of operating expenses and for payment of various fees and expenses such as acquisition fees and asset management fees. We do not intend to establish a general working capital reserve out of the proceeds from our initial public offering during the offering. Accordingly, we are dependent on the proceeds raised in our public offering and if we are unable to raise sufficient proceeds, we may not be able to fund our existing or future operations. In addition, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for investments, the improvement of our real properties or for any other reason, sources of funding may not be available to us. If we cannot establish reserves out of cash flow generated by our investments or out of net sale proceeds in non-liquidating sale transactions, or obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire real properties and other real estate-related assets and to expand our operations will be adversely affected. As a result, we would be less likely to achieve portfolio diversification and our investment objectives, which may negatively impact our results of operations and reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Risks Relating to Our Organizational Structure

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit your right to bring claims against our officers and directors.

Maryland law provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct. Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, which we refer to as our “

charter” provides that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under Maryland law, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages. Our charter also provides that we will generally indemnify our directors, our officers, our advisor and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter does provide that we may not indemnify our directors, our advisor and its affiliates for loss or liability suffered by them or hold our directors or our advisor and its affiliates harmless for loss or liability suffered by us unless they have determined that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interests, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, our advisor and its affiliates or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets, including the proceeds of insurance, and not from the stockholders.

The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may benefit our stockholders.

Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the value of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock unless exempted by our board of directors. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease your ability to sell your shares of our common stock.

We may issue preferred stock or other classes of common stock, which issuance could adversely affect the holders of our common stock issued pursuant to our initial public offering.

Investors in our initial public offering do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. We may issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock or other classes of common stock with rights that could dilute the value of your shares of common stock. However, the issuance of preferred stock must also be approved by a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, who will have access, at our expense, to our legal counsel or to independent legal counsel. In some instances, the issuance of preferred stock or other classes of common stock would increase the number of stockholders entitled to distributions without simultaneously increasing the size of our asset base.

Our charter authorizes us to issue 450,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 400,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as common stock and 50,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may amend our charter to increase the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. If we ever createdcreate and issuedissue preferred stock with a distribution preference over common stock, payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders, likely reducing the amount common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or a separate class or series of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

We have in the past, and may in the future, issue limited partner interests of our operating partnership in connection with certain transactions. Limited partners in our operating partnership have the right to vote on certain amendments to the operating partnership agreement, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. As general partner of our operating partnership, we are obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of our operating partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of limited partners in our operating partnership may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner stockholders do not believe are in their best interest.

In addition, TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC, the holder of special units in our operating partnership, may be entitled to (1) certain cash payments upon the disposition of certain of our operating partnership’s assets or (2) a one-time payment in the form of cash, a promissory note or shares of our common stock in conjunction with the redemption of the special units upon the occurrence of a listing of our shares on a national stock exchange or certain events that result in the termination or non-renewal of our advisory agreement. This potential obligation to make substantial payments to the holder of the special units may reduce our cash available for distribution to stockholders and limit the amount that stockholders will receive upon the consummation of a liquidity event.

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act; if we are subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we will not be able to continue our business.

Neither we, nor our operating partnership, nor any of our subsidiaries intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act. Currently, we, through our subsidiaries, own foursixteen commercial retail, single and multi-tenant properties. In order for us not to be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act, we engage, through our operating partnership and subsidiaries, primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year after our initial public offering ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of our initial public offering in properties within one year of the termination of our initial public offering, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly lower your returns.

We expect that most of our assets will be held through wholly owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership. We expect that most of these subsidiaries will be outside the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act as they are generally expected to hold at least 60% of their assets in real property. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the “40% test.” Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. We also expect that we and our operating partnership, as holding companies that conduct their businesses through our subsidiaries, will not meet the definition of an investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act.

In the event that the value of investment securities held by the subsidiaries of our operating partnership were to exceed 40%, we expect our subsidiaries to be able to rely on the exclusion from the definition of “investment company” provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Section 3(c)(5)(C), as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, requires each of our subsidiaries relying on this exception to invest at least 55% of its portfolio in “mortgage and other liens on and interests in real estate,” which we refer to as “qualifying real estate investments” and maintain an additional 25% of its assets in qualifying real estate investments or other real estate-related assets, or the 25% basket. The remaining 20% of the portfolio can consist of miscellaneous assets. What we buy and sell is therefore limited to these criteria. How we determine to classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act will be based in large measure upon no-action letters issued by the SEC staff in the past and other SEC interpretive guidance. These no-action positions were issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than ten years ago. Pursuant to this guidance, and depending on the characteristics of the specific investments, certain mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, mezzanine loans, joint

venture investments and the equity securities of other entities may not constitute qualifying real estate investments and therefore investments in these types of assets may be limited. No assurance can be given that the SEC will concur with our classification of our assets. Future revisions to the Investment Company Act or further guidance from the SEC may cause us to lose our exclusion from registration or force us to re-evaluate our portfolio and our investment strategy. Such changes may prevent us from operating our business successfully.

In the event that we, or our operating partnership, were to acquire assets that could make either entity fall within the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we believe that we would still qualify for an exclusion from registration pursuant to Section 3(c)(6). Although the SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6), we believe that we and our operating partnership may rely on Section 3(c)(6) if 55% of the assets of our operating partnership consist of, and at least 55% of the income of our operating partnership is derived from, qualifying real estate investments owned by wholly owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership.

To ensure that neither we, nor our operating partnership nor subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company, each entity may be unable to sell assets they would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets they would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we, our operating company or our subsidiaries may be required to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire. Although we, our operating partnership and our subsidiaries intend to monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each acquisition, any of these entities may not be able to maintain an exclusion from registration as an investment company. If we, our operating partnership or our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company but fail to do so, the unregistered entity would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against such entity. In addition, the contracts of such entity would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of the entity and liquidate its business.

Risks Related To Conflicts of Interest

We depend on our advisor and its key personnel and if any of such key personnel were to cease to be affiliated with our advisor, our business could suffer.

Our ability to make distributions and achieve our investment objectives is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition, disposition and management of real properties and other real estate-related assets, the selection of tenants for our real properties and the determination of any financing arrangements. In addition, our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain of the key personnel of our sponsor, including Anthony W. Thompson, Jack R. Maurer and James R. Wolford, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We currently do not have key man life insurance on Jack R. Maurer or James R. Wolford. If our advisor were to lose the benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of one or more of these individuals, our operating results could suffer.

We may compete with other affiliates of our advisor for opportunities to acquire or sell investments, which may have an adverse impact on our operations.

We may compete with other affiliates of our advisor which we refer to as “affiliates” for opportunities to acquire or sell real properties and other real estate-related assets. We may also buy or sell real properties and other real estate-related assets at the same time as other affiliates are considering buying or selling similar assets. In this regard, there is a risk that our advisor will select for us investments that provide lower returns to us than investments purchased by another affiliate. Certain of our affiliates own or manage real properties in geographical areas in which we expect to own real properties. As a result of our potential competition with other affiliates of our advisor, certain investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us may not in fact be available. This competition may also result in conflicts of interest that are not resolved in our favor.

The time and resources that our advisor and some of its affiliates, including our officers and directors, devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to the fact that affiliates of our advisor are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

Our advisor and some of its affiliates, including our officers and directors, are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. For example, our advisor’s management currently manages tenseveral privately offered real estate programs sponsored by affiliates of our advisor. As a result, the time and

resources they could devote to us may be diverted. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity for the same investors and investment opportunities. We may also co-invest with any such investment entity. Even though all such co-investments will be subject to approval by our independent directors, they could be on terms not as favorable to us as those we could achieve co-investing with a third party.

Our advisor and its affiliates, including our officers and some of our directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and other affiliates, which could result in actions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us in return for their services and these fees could influence the advice provided to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

Further, our advisor may recommend that we invest in a particular asset or pay a higher purchase price for the asset than it would otherwise recommend if it did not receive an acquisition fee. Certain acquisition fees and asset management fees payable to our advisor and property management fees payable to the property manager are payable irrespective of the quality of the underlying real estate or property management services during the term of the related agreement. These fees may influence our advisor to recommend transactions with respect to the sale of a property or properties that may not be in our best interest at the time. Investments with higher net operating income growth potential are generally riskier or more speculative. In addition, the premature sale of an asset may add concentration risk to the portfolio or may be at a price lower than if we held on to the asset. Moreover, our advisor has considerable discretion with respect to the terms and timing of acquisition, disposition, refinancing and leasing transactions. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn these fees may lead our advisor to place undue emphasis on criteria relating to its compensation at the expense of other criteria, such as the preservation of capital, to achieve higher short-term compensation. Considerations relating to our affiliates’ compensation from us and other affiliates of our advisor could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders, which could hurt our ability to pay you distributions or result in a decline in the value of your investment.

The conflicts of interest faced by our officers may cause us not to be managed solely in the best interests of our stockholders, which may adversely affect our results of operations and the value of your investment.

Some of our officers are officers and employees of our sponsor, our advisor and other affiliated entities which receive fees in connection with our initial public offering and our operations. Anthony W. Thompson is our Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer and President and also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of our sponsor. Mr. Thompson controls our sponsor and indirectly controls our advisor and dealer manager. Jack R. Maurer is our Vice Chairman of the Board and President and also serves as the Vice Chairman Partner of our sponsor. James R. Wolford is our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary and also serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our sponsor and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of our advisor. Certain of our officers also own an economic interest in TNP SRT Management, LLC, which owns a 25% interest in our advisor. The ownership interest in our advisor and sponsor by certain of our officers may create conflicts of interest and cause us not to be managed solely in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our advisor may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire assets from its affiliates or enter into joint ventures with its affiliates. As a result, in any such transaction we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

Our advisor may cause us to invest in a property owned by, or make an investment in equity securities in or real estate-related loans to, one of its affiliates or through a joint venture with its affiliates. In these circumstances, our advisor will have a conflict of interest when fulfilling its fiduciary obligation to us. In any such transaction, we would not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The fees we pay to affiliates in connection with our initial public offering and in connection with the acquisition and management of our investments were not determined on an arm’s-length basis; therefore, we do not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The fees paid to our advisor, our property manager, our dealer manager and other affiliates for services they provide for us were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. As a result, the fees have been determined without the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties and may be in excess of amounts that we would otherwise pay to third parties for such services.

We may purchase real property and other real estate-related assets from third parties who have existing or previous business relationships with affiliates of our advisor, and, as a result, in any such transaction, we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

We may purchase real property and other real estate-related assets from third parties that have existing or previous business relationships with affiliates of our advisor. The officers, directors or employees of our advisor and its affiliates and the principals of our advisor who also perform services for other TNP affiliates of our advisor may have a conflict in representing our interests in these transactions on the one hand and the interests of such affiliates in preserving or furthering their respective relationships on the other hand. In any such transaction, we will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties, and the purchase price or fees paid by us may be in excess of amounts that we would otherwise pay to third parties.

Risks Related To Investments In Real Estate Generally

Changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

We are subject to risks incident to the ownership of real estate assets including changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions. We are subject to risks generally attributable to the ownership of real estate assets, including: changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions; changes in supply of or demand for similar properties in an area; increased competition for real estate assets targeted by our investment strategy; bankruptcies, financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants; changes in interest rates and availability of financing; and changes in government rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws.

We are unable to predict future changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions. For example, a recession or rise in interest rates could make it more difficult for us to lease real properties or dispose of them. In addition, rising interest rates could also make alternative interest-bearing and other investments more attractive and therefore potentially lower the relative value of the real estate assets we acquire. These conditions, or others we cannot predict, may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

Changes in supply of or demand for similar real properties in a particular area may increase the price of real properties we seek to purchase and decrease the price of real properties when we seek to sell them.

The real estate industry is subject to market forces. We are unable to predict certain market changes including changes in supply of, or demand for, similar real properties in a particular area. Any potential purchase of an overpriced asset could decrease our rate of return on these investments and result in lower operating results and overall returns to our stockholders.

Our operating expenses may increase in the future and, to the extent such increases cannot be passed on to tenants, our cash flow and our operating results would decrease.

Operating expenses at our properties, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor and insurance, are not fixed and may increase in the future. There is no guarantee that we will be able to pass such increases on to our tenants. To the extent such increases cannot be passed on to tenants, any such increase would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease.

Increasing vacancy rates for certain classes of real estate assets resulting from an economic downturn and disruption in the financial markets could adversely affect the value of assets we acquire.

We depend upon tenants for a majority of our revenue from real property investments. An economic downturn and disruption in the financial markets may result in a trend toward increasing vacancy rates for certain classes of commercial property, particularly in large metropolitan areas, due to increased tenant delinquencies and/or defaults under leases, generally lower demand for rentable space and potential oversupply of rentable space. Business failures and downsizings may lead to reduced consumer demand for retail products and services and reduced demand for retail space. Reduced demand for retail properties could require us to grant rent concessions, make tenant improvement expenditures or reduce rental rates to maintain occupancies beyond those anticipated at the time we acquire a property. A prolonged recovery or a future economic downturn could impact certain of the real estate assets we may acquire and such real estate assets could experience higher levels of vacancy than anticipated at the time of our acquisition of such real estate assets. The value of our real estate assets could decrease below the amounts we paid for them. Revenues from properties could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and potential increases in uncollectible rent. Additionally, we will incur expenses, such as for maintenance costs, insurances costs and property taxes, even though a property is vacant. The longer the period of significant vacancies for a property, the greater the potential negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. An economic downturn resulting in increased tenant delinquencies and/or defaults and decreases in demand could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the value of our real estate assets.

Our real properties are subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our real properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as tax rates change and as the real properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. We anticipate that certainCertain of our leases will generally provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the real properties that they occupy, while other leases will generally provide that we are responsible for such taxes. In any case, as the owner of the properties, we are ultimately responsible for payment of

the taxes to the applicable government authorities. If real property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes even if otherwise stated under the terms of the lease. If we fail to pay any such taxes, the applicable taxing authority may place a lien on the real property and the real property may be subject to a tax sale. In addition, we will generally be responsible for real property taxes related to any vacant space.

Uninsured losses or premiums for insurance coverage relating to real property may adversely affect your returns.

We attempt to adequately insure all of our real properties against casualty losses. There are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Risks associated with potential terrorismterrorist acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders sometimes require commercial property owners to purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. These policies may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our real properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. Changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. In the event that any of our real properties incurs a casualty loss which is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, we cannot assure you that funding will be available to us for repair or reconstruction of damaged real property in the future.

We compete with numerous other parties or entities for real estate assets and tenants and may not compete successfully.

We compete with numerous other persons or entities seeking to buy real estate assets or to attract tenants. These persons or entities may have greater experience and financial strength than us. There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire real estate assets or attract tenants on favorable terms, if at all. For example, our competitors may be willing to offer space at rental rates below our rates, causing us to lose existing or potential tenants and pressuring us to reduce our rental rates to retain existing tenants or convince new tenants to lease space at our properties. Each of these factors could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, value of our investments and ability to pay distributions to you.

Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of real properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of real properties could adversely affect your returns. Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. Therefore, you could suffer delays in receiving cash distributions attributable to those particular real properties. Delays in completion of construction could give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. Each of those factors could result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, the price we agree to pay for a real property will be based on our projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of real property upon completion of construction. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property.

Actions of joint venture partners could negatively impact our performance.

We may enter into joint ventures with third parties, including with entities that are affiliated with our advisor. We may also purchase and develop properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, affiliates of the sellers, developers or other persons. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with a direct investment in real estate, including, for example:

Under certain joint venture arrangements, neither venture partner may have the power to control the venture and an impasse could be reached, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In addition, to the extent that our venture partner or co-tenant is an affiliate of our advisor, certain conflicts of interest will exist.

Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations related to environmental protection and human health and safety may be high.

All real property investments and the operations conducted in connection with such investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such real property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such real property as collateral for future borrowings. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which real property may be used or businesses may be operated. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our real properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our real properties. There are also various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our real properties, we may be exposed to such costs in connection with such regulations. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of any damages or fines we must pay, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated real property could materially and adversely affect our business, lower the value of our assets or results of operations and, consequently, lower the amounts available for distribution to you.

The costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Investment in real properties may also be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. We are committed to complying with the act to the extent to which it applies. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. With respect to the properties we acquire, the ADA’s requirements could require us to remove access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA. We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. Any monies we use to comply with the ADA will reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Real properties are illiquid investments, and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions or sell a property if or when we decide to do so.

Real properties are illiquid investments. We may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and supply and demand that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any real property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a real property. Also, we may acquire real properties that are subject to contractual “lock-out” provisions that could restrict our ability to dispose of the real property for a period of time. We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.

In acquiring a real property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that real property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that real property. Our real properties may also be subject to resale restrictions. All these provisions would restrict our ability to sell a property, which could reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Risks Associated with Retail Property

The recent economic downturn in the United States has had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on the retail industry generally. Slow or negative growth in the retail industry will result in defaults by retail tenants which could have an adverse impact on our financial operations.

The recent economic downturn in the United States has had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the retail industry generally. As a result, the retail industry may continue to face reductions in sales revenues and increased bankruptcies. Adverse economic conditions may result in an increase in distressed or bankrupt retail companies, which in turn could result in an increase in defaults by tenants at our commercial properties. Additionally, slow economic growth is likely to hinder new entrants into the retail market which may make it difficult for us to fully lease our properties. Tenant defaults and decreased demand for retail space would have an adverse impact on the value of our retail properties and our results of operations.

We anticipate that our properties will consist primarily of retail properties. Our performance, therefore, is linked to the market for retail space generally.

We currentlyAs of December 31, 2011, we own foureleven properties, each of which is a multi-tenant retail center.center and all but one have multiple tenants. The market for retail space has been and in the future could be adversely affected by weaknesses in the national, regional and local economies, the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies, consolidation in the retail sector, excess amounts of retail space in a number of markets and competition for tenants with other shopping centers in our markets. Customer traffic to these shopping areas may be adversely affected by the closing of stores in the same shopping center, or by a reduction in traffic to such stores resulting from a regional economic downturn, a general downturn in the local area where our store is located, or a decline in the desirability of the shopping environment of a particular shopping center. Such a reduction in customer traffic could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our retail tenants face competition from numerous retail channels, which may reduce our profitability and ability to pay distributions.

Retailers at our current retail properties and at any retail property we may acquire in the future face continued competition from discount or value retailers, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs, mail order catalogues and operators, television shopping networks and shopping via the Internet. Such competition could adversely affect our tenants and, consequently, our revenues and funds available for distribution.

Retail conditions may adversely affect our base rent and subsequently, our income.

Some of our leases may provide for base rent plus contractual base rent increases. A number of our retail leases may also include a percentage rent clause for additional rent above the base amount based upon a specified percentage of the sales our tenants generate. Under those leases which contain percentage rent clauses, our revenue from tenants may increase as the sales of our tenants increase. Generally, retailers face declining revenues during downturns in the economy. As a result, the portion of our revenue which we may derive from percentage rent leases could decline upon a general economic downturn.

Our revenue will be impacted by the success and economic viability of our anchor retail tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and adversely affect the returns on your investment.

In the retail sector, a tenant occupying all or a large portion of the gross leasable area of a retail center, commonly referred to as an “anchor tenant”, may become insolvent, may suffer a downturn in business, or may decide not to renew its lease. Any of these events at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future would result in a reduction or cessation in rental payments to us and would adversely affect our financial condition. A lease termination by an anchor tenant at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants whose leases may permit cancellation or rent reduction if another tenant’s lease is terminated. In such event, we may be unable to re-lease the vacated space. Similarly, the leases of some anchor tenants may permit the anchor tenant to transfer its lease to another retailer. The transfer of a lease to a new anchor tenant could cause customer traffic in the retail center to decrease and thereby reduce the income generated by that retail center. A lease transfer to a new anchor tenant could also allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases. In the event that we are unable to re-lease vacated space at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future to a new anchor tenant, we may incur additional expenses in order to re-model the space to be able to re-lease the space to more than one tenant.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely impact our operations and our ability to pay distributions.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future may have an adverse impact on our income and our ability to pay distributions. Generally, under bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre-bankruptcy arrears and

amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Risks Associated with Real Estate-Related Loans and Other Real Estate-Related Assets

Disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could adversely impact the commercial mortgage market as well as the market for debt-related investments generally, which could hinder our ability to implement our business strategy and generate returns for our stockholders.

As part of our investment strategy, we intend to acquire a portfolio of real estate-related loans, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments. The returns available to investors in these investments are determined by: (1) the supply and demand for such investments and (2) the existence of a market for such investments, which includes the ability to sell or finance such investments. During periods of volatility, the number of investors participating in the market may change at an accelerated pace. As liquidity or “demand” increases, the returns available to investors will decrease. Conversely, a lack of liquidity will cause the returns available to investors to increase. During the last few years, concerns pertaining to the deterioration of credit in the residential mortgage market have expanded to almost all areas of the debt capital markets including corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and commercial real estate mortgages and loans. Future instability may interfere with the successful implementation of our business strategy.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, our mortgage loans may be affected by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of those loans and the return on your investment.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, we will be at risk of defaults by the borrowers on those mortgage loans. These defaults may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including interest rate levels and local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values. We will not know whether the values of the properties securing our mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those mortgage loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, our mortgage loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates and reduce the value of the mortgage loans in the event we sell them; accordingly, the value of your investment would be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.

If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term mortgage loans and interest rates rise, the mortgage loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that mortgage loans are prepaid because we may not be able to make new loans at the higher interest rate. If we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates decrease, our revenues will also decrease. Finally, if we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates increase, the value of the loans we own at such time would decrease. For these reasons, if we invest in mortgage loans, our returns on those loans and the value of your investment will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.

The CMBS and CDOs in which we may invest are subject to several types of risks.

Commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, are bonds which evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, are a type of debt obligation that are backed by commercial real estate assets, such as CMBS, commercial mortgage loans, B-notes, or mezzanine paper. Accordingly, the mortgage backed securities we invest in are subject to all the risks of the underlying mortgage loans.

In a rising interest rate environment, the value of CMBS and CDOs may be adversely affected when payments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security’s effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The value of CMBS and CDOs may also change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities markets as a whole. In addition, CMBS and CDOs are subject to the credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties. In certain instances, third party guarantees or other forms of credit support can reduce the credit risk.

CMBS and CDOs are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate CMBS and CDOs are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes a large percentage of delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payment on subordinate CMBS and CDOs will not be fully paid. Subordinate securities of CMBS and CDOs are also subject to greater credit risk than those CMBS and CDOs that are more highly rated.

The mezzanine loans in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.

We may invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity owning the real property, the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real property or other assets. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower

defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

Risks Associated With Debt Financing

Restrictions imposed by our credit facility may limit our ability to execute our business strategy and increase the risk of default under our debt obligations.

We are a party to a $35$43.0 million credit facility with KeyBank that contains restrictive covenants. These restrictions include requirements to maintain financial ratios, which may significantly limit our ability to, among other things:

In addition, our credit facility requires us to raise certain specified amounts in offering proceeds from our ongoing public offering. The failure to raise sufficient proceeds or a decline in our operations, which could reduce our cash from operation, could cause us to be in default under the credit agreement and our other debt obligations.

As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had approximately $13.3$43.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility. Tranche A of ourOur credit facility comprising of $12.0 million of indebtedness matures on December 17, 2013, subject to extension. Tranche B of our credit facility comprising of $1.3 million of indebtedness matures on June 30, 2011. We may, in the future, be required to refinance or negotiate an extension of the maturity of our credit facility. However, our ability to complete a refinancing or extension is subject to a number of conditions, many of which are beyond our control. Failure to complete a refinancing or extension of our credit facility could have a material adverse effect on us and our operations.

Disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could also adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and the values of investments we make.

The capital and credit markets experienced extreme volatility and disruption during 2008 and 2009. Liquidity in the global credit market has been severely contracted by these market disruptions, making it costly to obtain new lines of credit or refinance existing debt. We have, and expect to continue to, finance our investments in part with debt. As a result of the recent turmoil in the credit markets, we may not be able to obtain debt financing on attractive terms or at all. As such, we may be forced to use a greater proportion of our offering proceeds to finance our acquisitions and originations, reducing the number of investments we would otherwise make. If the current debt market environment persists, we may modify our investment strategy in order to optimize our portfolio performance. Our options would include limiting or eliminating the use of debt and focusing on those investments that do not require the use of leverage to meet our portfolio goals.

We will incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of your investment.

We have, and may in the future, obtain lines of credit and long-term financing that may be secured by our real properties and other assets. Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing which precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts or other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75% of the aggregate cost of our investments before non-cash reserves and depreciation. Our charter allows us to borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess. As of December 31, 2010,2011, we were overexceeded the 300% limit due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were incurredacquired with the acquisition of our properties. SinceBecause these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and sincebecause our overall indebtedness iswas less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2011, this excess borrowing has been approved by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors. Also, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our investments as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional investments or for working capital. We may also borrow funds as necessary or advisable to ensure we maintain our REIT tax qualification, including the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders (computed without regard to the distribution paid deduction and excluding net capital gains). Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

High debt levels will cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of your investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. If any mortgage contains cross collateralization or cross default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

Instability in the debt markets may make it more difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make to our stockholders.

If mortgage debt is unavailable on reasonable terms as a result of increased interest rates or other factors, we may not be able to finance the initial purchase of properties. In addition, if we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest

rates are higher when we refinance debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us, or could result in the foreclosure of such properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing securities or by borrowing more money.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and negatively impact our operating results.

Interest we pay on our debt obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. If we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. If we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage a property, discontinue insurance coverage, or replace our advisor. In addition, loan documents may limit our ability to replace a property’s property manager or terminate certain operating or lease agreements related to a property. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Our derivative financial instruments that we may use to hedge against interest rate fluctuations may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates and could reduce the overall returns on your investment.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging transactions will not result in losses. In addition, the use of such instruments may reduce the overall return on our investments. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income test.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.

We believe that we operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. Although we do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to our REIT status, we have received the opinion of Alston & Bird LLP with respect to our qualification as a REIT. This opinion has been issued in connection with our initial public offering. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of counsel are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or on any court. The opinion of Alston & Bird LLP represents only the view of our counsel based on our counsel’s review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations relating to the values of our assets and the sources of our income. Alston & Bird LLP has no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed in its opinion or of any subsequent change in applicable law. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinion of Alston & Bird LLP and ourOur qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable income tax regulations that have been promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code is greater in the case of a REIT that holds its assets through a partnership, as we do. Moreover, no assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we lose our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer be deductible in computing our taxable income and we would no longer be required to make distributions. To the extent that distributions had been made in anticipation of our qualifying as a REIT, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments to pay the applicable corporate income tax. In addition, although we intend to operate in a manner intended to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our board of directors to recommend that we revoke our REIT election.

We believe that our operating partnership will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. To minimize the risk that our operating partnership will be considered a “publicly traded partnership” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, we have placed certain transfer restrictions on the transfer or redemption of the partnership units in our operating partnership. If the Internal Revenue Service were successfully to determine that our operating partnership should properly be treated as a corporation, our operating partnership would be required to pay federal income tax at corporate rates on its net income, its partners would be treated as stockholders of our operating partnership and distributions to partners would constitute distributions that would not be deductible in computing our operating partnership’s taxable income. In addition, we could fail to qualify as a REIT, with the resulting consequences described above.

To qualify as a REIT we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may result in us distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on investments in real estate assets and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds or sell assets to fund these distributions. If we fund distributions through borrowings, then we will have to repay debt using money we could have otherwise used to acquire properties, resulting in our ownership of fewer real estate assets. If we sell assets or use offering proceeds to pay distributions, we also will have fewer investments. Fewer investments may impact our ability to generate future cash flows from operations and, therefore, reduce your overall return. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income taxation on the earnings that we distribute, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so. As of December 31, 2010,2011, we have funded all of our distribution payments with offering proceeds.

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

We may purchase real properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. While we will use our best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease,” thereby allowing us to be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes, we cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year.

You may have current tax liability on distributions if you elect to reinvest in shares of our common stock.

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received a cash distribution equal to the fair market value of the stock received pursuant to the plan. For Federal income tax purposes, you will be taxed on this amount in the same manner as if you have received cash; namely, to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits, you will have ordinary taxable income. To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of such earnings and profits, the distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital, which will reduce the tax basis in your stock, and the amount of the distribution in excess of such basis will be taxable as a gain realized from the sale of your common stock. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the common stock received.

Distributions payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates that apply to other corporate distributions.

Tax legislation enacted in 2003, as amended, generally reduces the maximum tax rate for distributions payable by corporations to individuals to 15% through 2010.2012. Distributions payable by REITs, however, generally continue to be taxed at the normal rate applicable to the individual recipient, rather than the 15% preferential rate. Although this legislation does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or distributions paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate distributions could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay distributions, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock.

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax, which could reduce the return on your investment.

Our ability to dispose of property during the first few years following acquisition is restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT status. Under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding prohibited transactions by REITs, we will be subject to a 100% tax on any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property) we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including our operating partnership, but excluding our future taxable REIT subsidiaries, that are deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. We intend to avoid the 100% prohibited transaction tax by (1) conducting activities that may otherwise be considered prohibited transactions through a taxable REIT subsidiary, (2) conducting our operations in such a manner so that no sale or other disposition of an asset we own, directly or through any subsidiary other than a taxable REIT subsidiary, will be treated as a prohibited transaction or (3) structuring certain dispositions of our properties to comply with certain safe harbors available under the Internal Revenue Code for properties held at least two years. However, despite our present intention, no assurance can be given that any particular property we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including our operating partnership, but excluding our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will not be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our real estate assets and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.

Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock nor gain from the sale of common stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:

Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including shares of stock in other REITs, certain mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than governmental securities and qualified real

estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10.0% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5.0% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25.0% of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT status.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our status as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the federal income tax laws applicable to investments in REITs and similar entities. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares of our common stock. We urge you to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may acquire mezzanine loans, for which the Internal Revenue Service has provided a safe harbor in Revenue Procedure 2003-65. Pursuant to such safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan is secured by interests in a pass-through entity, it will be treated by the Internal Revenue Service as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. Although the Revenue Procedure provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We intend to make investments in loans secured by interests in pass-through entities in a manner that complies with the various requirements applicable to our qualification as a REIT. We may, however, acquire mezzanine loans that do not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the Internal Revenue Service could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

We may be required to pay some taxes due to actions of a taxable REIT subsidiary which would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

If we elect to create one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries, any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax. In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation. For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs. To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to you.

Recharacterization of transactions under the operating partnership’s intended private placements could result in a 100% tax on income from prohibited transactions, which would diminish our cash distributions to our stockholders.

The Internal Revenue Service could recharacterize transactions under the operating partnership’s intended private placements such that the operating partnership could be treated as the bona fide owner, for tax purposes, of properties acquired and resold by the entity established to facilitate the transaction. Such recharacterization could result in the income realized on these transactions by the operating partnership being treated as gain on the sale of property that is held as inventory or otherwise held primarily for the sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. In such event, such gain would constitute income from a prohibited transaction and would be subject to a 100% tax. If this occurs, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

Foreign investors may be subject to FIRPTA on the sale of shares of our common stock if we are unable to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT.

A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA, on the gain recognized on the disposition. FIRPTA does not

apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is a “domestically controlled REIT.” A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period (the continuous five year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, the entire period of the REIT’s existence), less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by a foreign investor on a sale of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA unless our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5.0% of the value of our outstanding common stock.

Retirement Plan Risks

If you fail to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, you could be subject to criminal and civil penalties.

There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA (such as pension, profit-sharing or 401(k) plans), and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA or Keogh plan) whose assets are being invested in our common stock. If you are investing the assets of such a plan (including assets of an insurance company general account or entity whose assets are considered plan assets under ERISA) or account in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our common stock constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested.

None.

Property Portfolio

As of December 31, 2010,2011, our portfolio included foureleven retail properties comprising an aggregate of 408,983approximately 1,131,000 square feet of multi-tenant commercial retail space located in threeseven states. These properties are Moreno Marketplace, Waianae Mall, Northgate Plaza and San Jacinto Esplanade. The total cost of our properties was approximately $53,326,000,$155,261,000, exclusive of closing costs. As of December 31, 20102011 and 20092010 there was $39,164,000$112,395,000 and $10,490,000$39,164,000 of indebtedness on our properties, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 there wasrespectively, which included $42,968,000 and $13,293,000, respectively, of indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility whichthat was secured by certain of our properties. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately 81.4% and 2009, approximately 83.0% and 70.1% of our portfolio was leased (based on rentable square footage), with an average remaining lease term of approximately 10.08.4 and 16.810.0 years, respectively.

We invest in and manage a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, primarily located in the Western United States. Although we have not done so, we may also invest in and originate mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had invested in foureleven properties and incurred debt as set forth below:

Lease Expirations

The following table reflects lease expirations of our properties as of December 31, 2010:2011:

As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had a concentration of credit risk related to the following individual tenanttenants’ leases that represented more than 10% of a retail propertiesproperty’s annualized base rent:

20112012 Property AcquisitionAcquisitions

Morningside Marketplace

On March 30, 2011,January 9, 2012, we acquired through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, Craig Promenade,fee simple interest in a necessitymultitenant retail center located in North Las Vegas, Nevada. Craig Promenade is comprised of 109,250 square feet which includes 91,750 rentable square feet and two land parcels consisting of 17,500 buildable square feet that can be sold, ground leased or developed. Craig Promenade was constructed in 2005, is 77.5% leased and anchored by Big Lots, a national retailer. Other nationally recognized tenants include Carl’s Jr., Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen and MetroPCS Communications, Inc. We purchased the Craig PromenadeFontana, California, commonly known as Morningside Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $12,800,000. We$18,050,000, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisition was financed the purchase price of the Craig Promenade with (1) proceeds from our initial public offering, (2) approximately $11,953,000 in funds borrowed under our revolving credit agreement with KeyBank, (3) approximately $1,200,000 in funds borrowed from SMB Equity, LLC, a third party lender, and (4) approximately $1,355,000 in funds borrowed from our sponsor and other affiliates. For more information on the terms of loans from affiliates, see Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements contain in this Annual Report.

Woodlands West Marketplace

On February 3, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Woodland West Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $13,950,000, excluding closing costs. We financed a portion of the purchase price for the Woodland West Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our initial public offering, (2) a loan in the amount of $10,200,000 from JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, or JPM, and (3) a mezzanine loan in the amount of $1,300,000 from JPM.

Esenada Square

On February 28, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Ensenada Square for an aggregate purchase price of $5,175,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Ensenada Square with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $8,750,000 of indebtedness$3,266,000 in funds borrowed under our 2010revolving credit facility (as defined below).agreement with KeyBank.

Shops at Turkey Creek

On March 12, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Knoxville, Tennessee, commonly known as the Shops at Turkey Creek, or Turkey Creek, in an UPREIT transaction with our operating partnership, for an aggregate purchase price of $4,300,000 excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for Turkey Creek through the issuance of 144,324 Common Units to the sellers of Turkey Creek and approximately $2,520,000 in funds borrowed under our revolving credit agreement with KeyBank.

Aurora Commons

On March 20, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Aurora, Ohio, commonly known as the Aurora Commons, for an aggregate purchase price of $7,000,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Aurora Commons with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $4,550,000 in funds borrowed under our revolving credit agreement with KeyBank.

In the ordinary course of business we may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material pending legal proceedings or proceedings known to be contemplated against us or any of our subsidiaries.

Not applicable.

PART II

Stockholder Information

As of March 25, 2011,26, 2012, there were 8182,420 holders of record of our common shares. The number of stockholders is based on the records of our advisor, which also acts astransfer agent, an affiliate of our transfer agent.advisor.

Market Information

Our shares of common stock are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or any over-the-counter market. We do not expect our shares to become listed in the near future, and they may not become listed at all. Our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a transaction to provide liquidity for our stockholders until 2015 through any suchlisting on an exchange or through any other means. Our charter does not require our board of directors to pursue a liquidity event.event by a specific date. Due to the uncertainties of market conditions in the future, we believe setting finite dates for possible, but uncertain, liquidity events may result in actions not necessarily in the best interests or within the expectations of our stockholders. We expect that our board of directors, in the exercise of its fiduciary duty to our stockholders, will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that then-current market conditions are favorable for a liquidity event, and that such a transaction is in the best interests of our stockholders. A liquidity event could include (1) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets either on a portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation, in which the net proceeds are distributed to stockholders, (2) a merger or another transaction approved by our board of directors in which our stockholders will receive cash and/or shares of a publicly traded company or (3) a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange. There can be no assurance as to when a suitable transaction will be available.

In order for members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, and their associated persons to have participated in the offering and sale of our common shares or to participate in any future offering of our common shares, pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110, we disclose in each Annual Report distributed to our stockholders a per share estimated value of our common shares,stock, the method by which it was developed and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, our advisor must prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our common shares. ForAlthough our board of directors has voluntarily determined an estimated value per share of $10.14 as of December 31, 2011, and we expect to update this estimated share value quarterly through the quarter ending June 30, 2012, we have determined that for these purposes, the estimated value of our shares shall be deemed to be $10.00 per share as of December 31, 2010.2011. The basis for this valuation is the fact that we are currently conducting a public offeringcontinue to sell shares of our common sharesstock in our public offering at the price of $10.00 per share (not taking into consideration purchase price discounts for certain categories of purchasers), and have not changed the price at which shares are acquired under our distribution reinvestment program or our share redemption program (except with respect to shares redeemed upon death or disability of a stockholder).

Distributions

In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our stockholders. Until we generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund the payment of distributions, some or all of our distributions will be paid from other sources, including proceeds from our initial public offering. The amount and timing of our cash distributions is determined by our board of directors and depends on the amount of funds available for distribution, current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations, any limitations imposed by the terms of indebtedness we may incur and other factors. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period but may be made in anticipation of cash flow which we expect to receive during a later quarter and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. Due to these timing differences, we may be required to borrow money, use proceeds from the issuance of securities or sell assets in order to make distributions.

On August 13, 2009, our board of directors approved a monthly cash distribution of $0.05625 per common share, which represented an annualized distribution of $0.675 per share if paid over a 365-day period. On May 11, 2010, our board of directors authorized an increase to the previously declared monthly cash distribution from $0.05625 to $0.05833 per share of common stock, contingent upon the closing of the Waianae Property acquisition. The new monthly distribution amount represents an annualized distribution of $0.70 per share on our common stock if paid over a 365-day period and began to accrue effective July 1, 2010. There is no guarantee that we will continue to pay distributions at this rate in the future, or at all.

The following table sets forth the distributions declared and the amounts paid in cash and pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plancommon stockholders and holders of Common Units for the years ended December 31, 20102011 and 2009:2010:

The tax composition of our distributions declared forpaid during the years ended December 31, 20102011 and 20092010 was as follows:

On December 31, 2010, our board of directors2011, we declared a monthly distribution in the aggregate amount of $136,000,$335,000, of which $91,000 was accrued as of December 31, 2010 and$215,000 was paid in cash on or about January 14, 201115, 2012 and $45,000$120,000 was paid through our dividenddistribution reinvestment plan in the form of additional shares issued on or about January 1, 2011.15, 2012. For the years ended December 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, cash amounts distributed to stockholders were funded from proceeds from our initial public offering and represented a 100% return of capital to stockholders.

Share Redemption Program

We have adopted a share redemption program that may provide limited liquidity to certain of our stockholders. Unless shares are being redeemed due to the death or disability of a stockholder, we may not redeem shares under the share redemption planprogram unless the holder has held the shares for at least one year. Additionally, the number of shares that may be redeemed during any calendar year is limited to (1) 5.0% of the weighted average of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year and (2) those that could be funded from the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan in the prior calendar year plus such additional funds as may be reserved for that purpose by our board of directors. Our board of

directors may, in its sole discretion, amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time if it determines that the funds available to fund the share redemption program are needed for other business or operational purposes or that amendment, suspension or termination of the share redemption program is in the best interest of our stockholders. The share redemption program will terminate if the shares of our common stock are listed on a national securities exchange. We did not receive any requests for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program for the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we redeemed approximately 30,20012,500 shares under our share redemption program, at an average redemption price of $10.00 per share for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $302,000.$125,000. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we redeemed approximately 16,279 shares under our share redemption program, at an average redemption price of $9.30 per share for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $162,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, we redeemed shares pursuant to our share redemption program as follows:

(2)	We will redeem shares of our common stock upon the death or disability of a stockholder at the most recently determined estimated value per share.We limit the amount of shares that can be redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program as set forth above.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Offering Proceeds

On October 16, 2008, we were initially capitalized with the sale of 22,222 shares of common stock to our sponsor for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000 in a private transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

On August 7, 2009, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-154975) registering a public offering of up to $1,100,000,000 in shares of our common stock was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and we commenced our initial public offering. We are offering up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to the public in our primary offering at $10.00 per share and up to 10,526,316 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share. Our public offering will expire on August 7, 2011, unless2012; provided, however, under limited circumstances our initial public offering may be extended by our board of directors.for up to an additional 180 days.

As of December 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, we had sold 2,390,0175,969,507 and 509,7522,359,817 shares of common stock, net of share redemptions, in our initial public offering and through our distribution reinvestment plan, raising gross offering proceeds of $59,248,000 and $23,613,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, we had incurred $5,495,000 in selling commissions and $5,009,000, respectively. dealer manager fees to our dealer manager, TNP Securities, LLC, $3,016,000 in organization and offering costs (of which $1,411,000 are offering expenses that are recorded as a reduction to equity, $336,000 are organizational expenses that are recorded in general administrative expense, and $1,269,000 are recorded as deferred organization and offering costs and included as accounts payable due to affiliates as the amount of organization and offering costs had exceeded 3% of gross offering proceeds), and $5,012,000 in acquisition expenses.

As of December 31, 2010, we had incurred $2,068,000 in selling commissions and dealer manager fees to our dealer manager, $2,265,000 in organization and offering costs (of which $555,000 are offering expenses that are recorded as a reduction to equity, $116,000 are organizational expenses that are recorded in general administrative expense, and $1,571,000 are recorded as deferred organization and offering costs and inincluded as accounts payable due to affiliates as the amount of organization and offering costs had exceeded 3% of gross offering proceeds), $1,353,000 in acquisition expenses and $204,000 in asset management fees.

As of December 31, 2009, we had incurred $420,000 in selling commissions2011 and dealer manager fees to our dealer manager, $1,579,000 in organization and offering costs (of which $122,000 are offering expenses that are recorded as a reduction to equity, $32,000 are organizational expenses that are recorded in general administrative expense, and $1,425,000 are recorded as deferred organization and offering costs and in accounts payable due to affiliates as the amount of organization and offering costs had exceeded 3% of gross offering proceeds), $408,000 in acquisition expenses and $9,000 in asset management fees.

As of December 31, 2010, and 2009, we had offering proceeds, including proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan, net of selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and organization and offering costs, from our offering of $20,990,000 and $4,467,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we used the net proceeds from our initial public offering of $52,007,000 and $20,990,000, respectively, and debt financing to purchase $155,261,000 and $53,326,000 and $12,500,000 in real estate,retail properties, and paid $1,353,0004,147,000 and $408,000$1,353,000 of acquisition expenses. For more information regarding how we used our net offering proceeds through December 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, see Note 3 (Investments in(Acquisitions of Real Estate) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, the ratio of the cost of raising capital to net proceeds was approximately 13%13.9%.

On November 12, 2009, in connection with achieving the minimum offering amount of $2,000,000 in our public offering,During 2011, we issued 5,00015,000 shares of restricted stock to each of our three independent directors pursuant to our Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan, which is a sub-plan of our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Award Plan, or the Incentive Award Plan. We issued an additional 2,500 shares of restricted stock to each of our three independent directors on July 22, 2010 in connection with each director’s reelection to the board of directors at our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The issuanceissuances of restricted stock pursuant to the Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was pursuant to a private transaction exemptexemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. For more information on our Incentive Award Plan, see Note 11 (Incentive Award Plan) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

On May 26, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of the Pinehurst Square, our operating partnership issued 287,472 Common Units with an aggregate value of approximately $2,587,249 to certain of the sellers of the Pinehurst Property pursuant to a private transaction exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, we did not sell any other equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act. For more information on our Incentive Award Plan, see Note 10 (Incentive Award Plan) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data as of December 31, 2010, 2009,2011 and 20082010 and for the years then ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and for the period from September 18, 2008 (date of inception) through December 31, 2008 should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The selected financial data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statementsOperations” included in this Annual Report.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” above and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Annual Report. Also see “Forward Looking Statements” preceding Part I.

Overview

We were formed as a Maryland corporation on September 18, 2008 to invest in and manage a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located primarily in the Western United States, and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate.

On August 7, 2009, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-154975) registering a public offering of up to $1,100,000,000 in shares of our common stock was declared effective under the Securities Act and we commenced our initial public offering. We are offering up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to the public in our primary offering at $10.00 per share and up to 10,526,316 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share. Pursuant to the terms of our initial public offering, all subscription proceeds were placed in an account held by our escrow agent in trust for subscribers’ benefit until we had achieved gross offering proceeds of $2,000,000 from persons who are not affiliated with us. On November 12, 2009, we achieved the minimum offering amount of $2,000,000 and offering proceeds were released to us from the escrow account. We acquired our first property on November 19, 2009.

We are dependent upon proceeds received from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial public offering and any indebtedness that we may incur in order to conduct our proposed real estate investment activities. We were initially capitalized with $200,000 which was contributed in cash on October 16, 2008, from the sale of 22,222 shares in the aggregate to our sponsor, Thompson National Properties, LLC.LLC, or TNP. Our sponsor, or any affiliate of our sponsor, must maintain this investment while it remains our sponsor.

As of December 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, we had accepted investors’ subscriptions for, and issued, 2,390,0176,007,007 and 509,7522,382,317 shares of our common stock, including shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in gross offering proceeds of $23,613,000$59,248,000 and $5,009,000,$23,613,000, respectively. As of March 25, 2011,26, 2012, we had accepted investors’ subscriptions for, and issued, 2,732,5897,718,646 shares of our common stock, including 44,687154,573 shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in gross offering proceeds of $26,973,000.$76,290,641.

On March 16, 2012, our board of directors determined an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.14 as of December 31, 2011. In determining an estimated value of a share of our common stock, our board of directors relied upon information provided by our advisor, appraisal reports prepared by third parties on certain of our properties and other factors our board of directors deemed relevant. Our board of directors also took into account the estimated value of our other assets and liabilities, including a reasonable estimate of the value of our debt obligations. However, our board of directors did not consider certain other factors, such as a liquidity discount, because they did not believe such factors were appropriate or necessary under the circumstances. The estimated value per share determined by our board of directors does not represent the fair value of our assets less liabilities in accordance with GAAP, and such estimated value per share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that a stockholder would receive this amount if he sold his shares or we consummated a liquidity event. See also, “Risk Factors—Our board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.14 for our shares of common stock as of December 31, 2011. You should not rely on the estimated value per share as being an accurate measure of the current value of our shares of common stock.”

We have elected to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the year ended December 31, 2009, and therefore we generally are not subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year after the taxable year in which we initially elect to be taxed as a REIT, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which qualification is denied. Failing to qualify as a REIT could materially and adversely affect our net income. As of December 31, 2010,2011, we believe we were in compliance with the REIT requirements.

2010Market Outlook

Since 2008, concerns about credit risk and access to capital in the U.S. and global financial markets have been significant and widespread. Economies throughout the world have experienced increased unemployment and decreased consumer confidence due to a downturn in economic activity. Despite recent improved stock market performance and some positive economic indicators, a lack of significant job creation, low consumer confidence and a growing federal budget deficit weigh against the positive indicators. Amid signs of recovery in the economic and financial markets, concerns remain regarding job growth, wage stagnation, credit restrictions and increased taxation.

Over the past year, fundamental commercial real estate benchmarks, such as occupancy, rental rates and pricing have remained largely stagnant. Improvement in these fundamentals remains contingent upon sustainable economic growth. In general, borrower defaults may rise, and occupancy and rental rate stabilization will vary by market. Currently, benchmark interest rates, such as LIBOR, remain near historic lows. This has allowed borrowers with floating rate debt to continue to make debt service payments even as the properties securing these loans experience decreased occupancy and lower rental rates. Low short-term rates have allowed these borrowers to meet their debt obligations; however, they would not meet the current underwriting requirements needed to refinance this debt today. As these loans near maturity, borrowers may have to find new sources of funds in order to recapitalize their properties.

Although during the financial crisis and economic downturn, commercial real estate transactions experienced a sharp decline in volume, the recent trends show a rebound in activity as more commercial properties come into the market as loans mature and marginally performing properties default and banks increase their foreclosures. Additionally, new lending is improving. The commercial mortgage-backed securities market has again become a source of liquidity and debt capital and we have seen additional debt capital provided by lenders such as life insurance companies, local and regional banks and debt funds. The availability of additional capital has improved the volume of transactions in the commercial real estate market.

2011 Highlights

During 2010:Following are some highlights from fiscal 2011:

Review of our Policies

Our board of directors, including our independent directors, has reviewed our policies described in this Annual Report and determined that they are in the best interest of our stockholders because: (1) they increase the likelihood that we will be able to acquire a diversified portfolio of income producing properties, thereby reducing risk in its portfolio; (2) our executive officers, directors and affiliates of the advisor have expertise with the type of real estate investments we seek; and (3) borrowings should enable us to purchase assets and earn rental income more quickly, thereby increasing the likelihood of generating income for our stockholders and preserving stockholder capital.

Critical Accounting Policies

General

OurBelow is a discussion of the accounting policies have been established to conform to GAAP. The preparation ofthat management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments and assumptions, require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain and because they are important for understanding and evaluating our reported financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions.results. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the datedates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgmentWith different estimates or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions is different, it is possible that different accounting policies will be applied orassumptions, materially different amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses willcould be recorded, resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements or different amounts reported in theour financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. Below is

Revenue Recognition

Real Estate

We recognize minimum rent, including rental abatements, lease incentives and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a discussionstraight-line basis over the term of the accounting policies that management considersrelated leases when collectibility is reasonably assured and record amounts expected to be most critical. These policies require complex judgmentreceived in their applicationlater years as deferred rent receivable. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, we determine whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries, TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, LP, TNP SRT Secured Holdings, LLC, TNP SRT Moreno Marketplace, LLC, TNP SRT Waianae Mall, LLC, TNP SRT Northgate Plaza Tucson Holdings, LLC, TNP SRT Northgate Plaza Tucson, LLC and TNP SRT San Jacinto, LLC. All intercompany profits, balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Our consolidated financial statements will also include the accounts of our consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures in whichby us. When we are the primary beneficiary or in which we have a controlling interest. In determining whether we have a controlling interest in a joint venture and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, our management considers factors such as an entity’s purpose and design and our ability to direct the activitiesowner of the entity that most significantly impactstenant improvements, the entity’s economic performance, ownership interest, board representation, management representation, authoritytenant is not considered to make decisions, and contractual and substantive participating rightshave taken physical possession or have control of the partners/membersphysical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance that is funded is treated as wella lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:

We record property operating expense reimbursements due from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs in the period the related expenses are incurred.

We make estimates of the collectibility of our tenant receivables related to base rents, including deferred rent receivable, expense reimbursements and other revenue or receiveincome. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, deferred rent receivable, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the majorityadequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, management makes estimates of the expected residual returns, if they occur, or both.

Allocationrecovery of Real Property Purchase Price

We account for all acquisitionspre-petition and post-petition claims in accordance with GAAP. We first determineassessing the valueestimated collectibility of the land and buildings utilizing an “as if vacant” methodology. We then assignrelated receivable. In some cases, the ultimate resolution of these claims can exceed one year. When a fair value to anytenant is in bankruptcy, we will record a bad debt assumed at acquisition. The balance of the purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets associated with the existing leases valued on a fair value basis at the acquisition date prorated over the remaining lease terms. The tenant improvements are classified as an asset under investments in real estate and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms: (1) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with “cost avoidance” of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms generally experienced in our markets; (2) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurredreserve for the period required to lease the “assumed vacant” property to the occupancy level when purchased;tenant’s receivable balance and (3) above or below market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. The value of in-place leases are recorded in acquired lease intangibles, net and amortized over the remaining lease term. Above or below market leases are classified in acquired lease intangibles, net or in other liabilities, depending on whether the contractual terms are above or below market. Above market leases are amortized as a decrease togenerally will not recognize subsequent rental revenue overuntil cash is received or until the remaining non-cancelable termstenant is no longer in bankruptcy and has the ability to make rental payments. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded bad debt expense related to our tenant receivables of the respective leases$228,000 and below market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining initial lease term and any fixed rate renewal periods, if applicable.$147,000, respectively.

When we acquire real estate properties, we allocate the purchase price to the components of these acquisitions using relative fair values computed using estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of costs allocated between various components as well as the amount of costs assigned to individual properties in multiple property acquisitions. These allocations also impact depreciation expense and gains or losses recorded on future sales of properties.

Real PropertyEstate

CostsDepreciation and Amortization

Real estate costs related to the development, redevelopment, constructionacquisition and improvement of properties are capitalized. Interest incurredcapitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the asset on development, redevelopmenta straight-line basis. Repair and construction projects is capitalized until construction is substantially complete.

Maintenance and repair expensesmaintenance costs are charged to operationsexpense as incurred. Costs for majorincurred and significant replacements and betterments whichare capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs include heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equipment, roofs and parking lots,all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. We consider the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. Expenditures for tenant improvements are capitalized and depreciatedamortized over their estimated useful lives. Gains and losses are recognized upon disposal or retirementthe shorter of the related assets and are reflected in earnings.

Property is recorded at cost and is depreciated using a straight-line method overtenant’s lease term or expected useful life. We anticipate the estimated useful lives of theour assets by class to be generally as follows:

Real Estate Acquisition Valuation

We record the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and restructuring costs that do not meet the definition of a liability at the acquisition date are expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date. Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities require us to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, property-operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions would result in an incorrect valuation of our acquired tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities, which would impact the amount of our net income.

Revenue RecognitionImpairment of Real Estate and Related Intangible Assets and Liabilities

We recognize rental income on a straight-line basis overcontinually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the termcarrying amounts of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basisour real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable or realized. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the cash rent due undercarrying value of real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable, we assess the provisionsrecoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the lease agreementsreal estate and related intangible assets and liabilities through its undiscounted future cash flows and its eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, we would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any impairment charges.

Projecting future cash flows involves estimating expected future operating income and expenses related to the real estate and its related intangible assets and liabilities as well as market and other trends. Using inappropriate assumptions to estimate cash flows could result in incorrect fair values of the real estate and its related intangible assets and liabilities and could result in the overstatement of the carrying values of our real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities and an overstatement of our net income.

Real Estate Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We generally consider non-foreclosed real estate to be “held for sale” when the following criteria are met: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the property, (ii) the property is recordedavailable for sale immediately, (iii) the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, (iv) the sale of the property within one year is considered highly probable and (v) significant changes to the plan to sell are not expected. Real estate that is held for sale and its related assets are classified as deferred rent receivable“real estate held for sale” and is included as a component of accounts receivable“assets related to real estate held for sale,” respectively, for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We anticipate collecting these amounts overfinancial statements. Notes payable and other liabilities related to real estate held for sale are classified as “notes payable related to real estate held for sale” and “liabilities related to real estate held for sale,” respectively, for all periods presented in the termsaccompanying consolidated financial statements. Real estate classified as held for sale is no longer depreciated and reported at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value less costs to sell. Additionally, we record the operating results related to real estate that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held for sale as discontinued operations for all periods presented if the operations have been or are expected to be eliminated and we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the leases as scheduled rent paymentsproperty following the sale. As further discussed in Note 12, certain amounts from the prior year have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, we are made. Reimbursements from tenants for recoverablerequired to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, we are required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate taxesloans receivable and operating expenseslong-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are accruedclassified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

When available, we utilize quoted market prices from independent third-party sources to determine fair value and classify such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require us to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When we determine the market for a financial instrument owned by us to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, we use several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establish a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, we measure fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as revenuean asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

We consider the following factors to be indicators of an inactive market: (i) there are few recent transactions, (ii) price quotations are not based on current information, (iii) price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), (iv) indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability, (v) there is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with our estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability, (vi) there is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread, (vii) there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities, and (viii) little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market).

We consider the following factors to be indicators of non-orderly transactions: (i) there was not adequate exposure to the market for a period before the applicable expendituresmeasurement date to allow for marketing activities that are incurred. Lease payments that depend onusual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities under current market conditions, (ii) there was a factor that does not existusual and customary marketing period, but the seller marketed the asset or liability to a single market participant, (iii) the seller is not measurable atin or near bankruptcy or receivership (that is, distressed), or the inception ofseller was required to sell to meet regulatory or legal requirements (that is, forced), and (iv) the lease, such as future sales volume, would be contingent rentals in their entirety and, accordingly, would be excluded from minimum lease payments and included intransaction price is an outlier when compared with other recent transactions for the determination of income as they are earned.same or similar assets or liabilities.

Valuation of Accounts ReceivableIncome Taxes

We have taken into consideration certain factors that require judgmentselected to be madetaxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable

income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to the collectability of receivables. Collectability factors taken into consideration are the amounts outstanding, payment history and financial strength of the tenant, which takenqualify for treatment as a whole determinesREIT.

We have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Neither we nor our subsidiaries have been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions. Our evaluations were performed for the valuation.tax years ending December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008. As of December 31, 2011, returns for the calendar years 2008 through 2010 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions

Organization and Offering Costs

Our organizationOrganization and offering costs (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) are initially being paid by our advisor and its affiliates on our behalf. Such costs shall include legal, accounting, printing and other offering expenses, including marketing, salaries and direct expenses of certain of our advisor’s employees and employees of our advisor’s affiliates and others. Pursuant to ourthe advisory agreement with our advisor, we are obligated to reimburse our advisor or its affiliates, as applicable, for organization and offering costs associated with our initial public offering, provided that our advisor iswe are not obligated to reimburse usour advisor to the extent organization and offering costs, other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees, incurred by us exceed 3.0% of ourthe gross offering proceeds.proceeds from our initial public offering. Any such reimbursement will not exceed actual expenses incurred by our advisor. Prior to raising the minimum offering amount of $2,000,000 in our initial public offering, we had no obligation to reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for any organization and offering costs. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor on our behalf were $2,265,000 and $1,579,000, respectively. These costs are payable by us to the extent organization and offering costs, other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees, do not exceed 3.0% of the gross proceeds of our initial public offering. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, organization and offering costs did exceed 3.0% of the gross proceeds of our initial public offering, thus the amount in excess of the 3.0% limit, or $1,571,000 and $1,425,000, respectively, has been deferred.

All offering costs, including sales commissions and dealer manager fees, are recorded as an offset to additional paid-in-capital, and all organization costs are recorded as an expense when we have an obligation to reimburse our advisor.

Operating ExpensesRecent Accounting Pronouncements

We will reimburse our advisorIn May 2011, the Financial Standards Accounting Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, or ASU No. 2011-04. ASU No. 2011-04 updates and further clarifies requirements in GAAP for all expenses paid or incurred by our advisor in connection with the services provided to us, subject to the limitation that total operating expenses (including the asset management fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters does not exceed the greater of: (1) 2% of our average invested assets, or (2) 25% of our net income determined without reduction for any additions to depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash expenses and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period. Notwithstanding the above, we may reimburse our advisor for operating expenses in excess of this limitation if a majority of the independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our total operating expenses exceeded the 2%/25% limitation by $589,000. On February 25, 2011, our independent directors unanimously determined the excess amount of operating expenses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 to be justified because (1) the amounts reflect legitimate operating expenses necessary for the operation of our business, (2) we are currently in our acquisition and development stage, (3) certain of our properties are not yet stabilized, and (4) we are continuing to raise capital in our initial public offering but the expenses incurred as a result of being a public company (including for audit and legal services, director and officer liability insurance and fees for directors) are disproportionate to our average invested assets and net income and such expenses will benefit us and our stockholders in future periods. The independent directors further resolved, however, that our advisor would be required to repay us any portion of such excess amount to the extent that, as of the termination of the advisory agreement, our aggregate operating expenses as of such date exceed the 2%/25% limitation for all prior periods.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, amounts incurred by our advisor in connection with services provided to us were $2,653,000 and $1,967,000, of which $2,265,000 and $1,579,000 were organization and offering costs and $388,000 and $388,000 were other costs incurred on our behalf prior to raising the minimum offering amount in our initial public offering.

Impairment

We assess the potential for impairment of our long-lived assets, including real estate properties, whenever events occur or a change in circumstances indicate that the recorded value might not be fully recoverable. We determine whether impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected from the use and eventual disposition of the asset to its carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, the real estate or intangible carrying value is reduced tomeasuring fair value and impairment loss is recognized. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount orfor disclosing information about fair value less costs to sell. Based upon such periodic assessments, no indicationsmeasurements. Additionally, ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies the FASB’s intent about the application of impairment were identifiedexisting fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively. We do not expect that the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated statementsadoption of operations included in this Annual Report.

Income Taxes

WeASU No. 2011-04 will have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. We believe that we operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we generally are not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent we distributed our REIT taxable incomematerial impact to our stockholders, so long as we distributed at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operations requirements. Even though we believe we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Our results of operations for the yearyears ended December 31, 20102011 and 20092010 are not indicative of those expected in future periods as we commenced real estate operations on November 19, 2009 in connection with our first property acquisition. During the period from our inception (September 18, 2008) to December 31, 2008, we had been formed but had not yet commenced our ongoing initial public offering or real estate operations. As a result, we had no material results of operations for that period.

As of December 31, 2010,2011, we had acquired foureleven properties for an aggregate purchase price of $53,326,000,$155,261,000, plus closing costs. We funded the acquisition of these properties primarily with a combination of debt and proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering. We acquired seven properties during 2011 and because the Waianae, Northgate and San Jacinto Properties during the second and third quartersfirst of 2010, and thereforethese properties was acquired on March 20, 2011, our financial statements for the 2011 fiscal year do not reflect a full year of operations for these properties. AsDuring 2010, we acquired three properties and because the first of December 31, 2009, we hadthese properties was acquired one property, the Moreno Property. We acquired the Moreno Property during the fourth quarter of 2009, and thereforeon June 6, 2010, our financial statements for the 2010 fiscal year do not reflect a full period of operations for this propertythese properties during 2009.2010. We expect that all income and expenses related to our portfolio will increase in future years as a result of owning the properties acquired in 20102011 for a full year and as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets.

Revenue.Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2011 to the year ended December 31, 2010 Total revenues were $4,823,000 and $145,000

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Revenue

Revenues increased by $5,983,000 to $10,776,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to revenues of $4,793,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of seven properties during fiscal 2011 and having a full year of operating results for properties acquired in 2010. The occupancy rate for our property portfolio was 81.4% based on 1,131,000 rentable square feet as of December 31, 2011 compared to occupancy of 83.0% based on 409,000 rentable square feet as of December 31, 2010. We expect rental income to increase in future periods as we acquire additional real estate investments and have full period operations from existing real estate investments.

Interest income

Interest income increased by $594,000 to $598,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to interest income of $4,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily related to interest earned from the mortgage loans acquired on June 29, 2011, which were later extinguished in connection with a consent foreclosure.

Operating and maintenance expenses

Operating and maintenance expense increased by $1,634,000 to $3,671,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to operating and maintenance expense of $2,037,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of seven properties since December 31, 2010 and 2009, which consistedhaving a full year of rental revenuesoperating results for properties acquired in 2010, and was partially offset in 2011 by the reversal of $4,823,000$213,000 of asset management fees that had been accrued by us. Asset management fees expensed during the year ended December 31, 2010 were $204,000. Included in operating and $140,000, respectively. Other operating revenue was $0maintenance expenses are property management fees paid to an affiliate of our advisor of $492,000 and $5,000$204,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We expect these expenses to increase in future periods as a result of the acquisition of additional properties.

General and 2009.administrative expenses

OperatingGeneral and maintenance expenses. Operating and maintenanceadministrative expenses were $2,049,000 and $114,000 forincreased by $435,000 to $2,167,000 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 20102011 compared to general and 2009. Asset management and property management fees incurred and payable to our advisor and its affiliates totaled $408,000 and $14,000administrative expenses of $1,732,000 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20102010. General and 2009.administrative expenses consisted primarily of legal fees, audit fees, restricted stock compensation, directors’ fees, salaries, tax fees, abandoned project costs and administrative expenses reimbursable to our advisor. Salaries, audit fees and abandoned project costs increased $279,000, $75,000, and $110,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. Our administrative expenses reimbursable to advisor increased $80,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to year ended December 31, 2010.

Depreciation and amortization expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2,312,000 to $4,384,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to depreciation and amortization expense of $2,072,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the seven additional properties owned during 2011. We expect asset managementdepreciation and property management feesamortization expense to increase in future years as a result of owning thecertain of our properties acquired in 2010 for a full year and as a result of anticipated future acquisitionsacquisitions.

Acquisition expenses

Acquisition expense increased by $2,794,000 to $4,147,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to acquisition expense of real estate and real estate related assets.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $1,733,000$1,353,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. These general and administrativeThis increase was primarily due to the expenses consisted primarily of legal fees of $306,000, audit fees of $327,000, restricted stock compensation of $78,000, directors fees of $296,000, salariesassociated with the seven additional property acquisitions since December 31, 2010, compared to only three property acquisitions during 2010.

Interest expense

Interest expense increased by $3,391,000 to $5,400,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to interest expense of $140,000, and other professional service fees of $192,000.

General and administrative expenses were $660,000$2,009,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. These general2010. This increase was primarily due to the increased debt levels associated with the acquisition of seven additional properties and administrative expenses consisted primarily of legal fees of $134,000, audit fees of $93,000, restricted stock compensation of $51,000, directors fees of $42,000, salariesthree mortgage loans during 2011. Interest expense of $18,000, and other professional service fees of $38,000. We expect general and administrative costs to increase in the future based on owning the properties acquired in 2010 for a full year and as a result of anticipated future acquisitions, but to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.

Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2,075,000 and $46,000 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. We expect these amounts to increase in future years as a result of owning the properties acquired in 2010 for a full year and as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate.

Acquisition expenses. Acquisition expenses were $1,353,000 and $408,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, all of which were incurred in connection with the acquisitions of our properties.

Interest expense. Interest expense was $2,009,000 and $119,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which2011 included the amortization of deferred financing costs of $364,000 and $39,000, respectively.$544,000. Our seven

additional real estate property acquisitions during 2010 and 2009 were financed through loan assumptions, notes payable and drawswith $73,800,000 of indebtedness. We recorded a $101,000 charge on our revolving lineearly extinguishment of credit. As ofdebt during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $39,164,000 and $10,490,0002011, as a result of outstanding indebtedness.refinancing $10,000,000 of the $15,300,000 mortgage loan secured by the Constitution Trail Centre. We expect that in future periods our interest expense will likely increase, but will vary based on the amount and cost of our borrowings, which will depend on the cost of borrowings, the amount of proceeds we raise in our ongoing initial public offering and our ability to identify and acquire real estate and real estate-related assets that meet our investment objectives.

Income from discontinued operations

Interest income. InterestIncome from discontinued operations increased by $111,000 to $125,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to income from discontinued operations of $14,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we classified three real estate pads as discontinued operations, including the Jack-In-The Box pad at the San Jacinto Esplanade, which we acquired in 2010.

Gain on sale of real estate

We recognized gains on sale of real estate of $963,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in gain on sale of real estate were gains from the sale of three leased real estate pads, including the Popeyes pad and the Carl’s Jr. pad at Craig Promenade, and the Jack-In-The Box pad at the San Jacinto Esplanade. Included in the sale of the Jack-In-The Box pad at the San Jacinto Esplanade was one unleased land parcel. We had no sales of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Bargain purchase gain

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired three distressed notes secured by the Constitution Trail Centre. We completed a consent foreclosure on October 21, 2011 and obtained fee simple title to the Constitution Trail Centre and recognized bargain purchase gain of $9,617,000. We determined the fair value of the property exceeded its acquisition cost (our basis in the distressed notes) and recorded a bargain purchase gain of $9,617,000. We had no bargain purchase gain during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Net income (loss)

We had net income of $2,310,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our net income is primarily attributable to the bargain purchase gain of $9,617,000 and gain on sale of real estate of $963,000. Net income (loss) in future years may vary depending on factors such as acquisition expenses, depreciation and amortization and gains or losses generated from sales. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $4,000 and $2,000, and related primarily to cash proceeds received from the sale of shares in our public offering that had not yet been used for investments in real estate assets.