UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DCD.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112014

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-14625 (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

0-25087 (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Maryland (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

Delaware (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

53-0085950 (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

52-2095412 (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500
Bethesda, Maryland

20817

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(240) 744-1000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on

Which Registered

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Common Stock, $.01 par value (707,561,384 (757,520,164

shares outstanding as of February 16, 2012)20, 2015)

New York Stock Exchange

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

None

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

None

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Units of limited partnership interest (703,107,908(750,840,635 units outstanding as of February 16, 2012)20, 2015)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Yes x

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Yes ¨

No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Yes ¨

No x

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Yes ¨

No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.days.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Yes x

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Yes x

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Yes x

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Yes x

No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

Large accelerated filer

x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨

Smaller reporting company

¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) x

Smaller reporting company

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Yes ¨

No x

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

Yes ¨

No x

The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (based on the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange) on June 17, 201130, 2014 was $10,807,209,930.$16,274,124,536.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to stockholders in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 10, 201214, 2015 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112014 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Host Inc.” mean Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and references to “Host L.P.” mean Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and its consolidated subsidiaries. We use the terms “we” or “our” or “the company” to refer to Host Inc. and Host L.P. together, unless the context indicates otherwise. We use the term Host Inc. to specifically refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and the term Host L.P. to specifically refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (and its consolidated subsidiaries) in cases where it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P.

Host Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT. Host Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and inof which it holds approximately 98.5%99% of the partnership interests (“OP units”). as of December 31, 2014. The remaining approximate 1.5% partnership interests are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. As the sole general partner of Host L.P., Host Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for Host L.P.’s day-to-day management and control.

We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of Host Inc. and Host L.P. into this single report results in the following benefits:

enhances investors’ understanding of Host Inc. and Host L.P. by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined presentation, since a substantial portion of our disclosure applies to both Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates Host Inc. and Host L.P. as one enterprise. The management of Host Inc. consists of the same members who direct the management of Host L.P. The executive officers of Host Inc. are appointed by Host Inc.’s board of directors, but are employed by Host L.P. Host L.P. employs everyone who works for Host Inc. or Host L.P. As general partner with control of Host L.P., Host Inc. consolidates Host L.P. for financial reporting purposes, and Host Inc. does not have significant assets other than its investment in Host L.P. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are the same on their respective financial statements.

There are a few differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P., which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P. in the context of how Host Inc. and Host L.P. operate as an interrelated consolidated company. Host Inc. is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of Host L.P. As a result, Host Inc. does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of Host L.P., and issuing public equity from time to time, the proceeds from which are contributed to Host L.P. in exchange for OP units. Host Inc. itself does not issue any indebtedness and does not guarantee the debt or obligations of Host L.P. Host L.P. holds substantially all of our assets and holds the ownership interests in our joint ventures. Host L.P. conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a limited partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by Host Inc., Host L.P. generates the capital required by our business through Host L.P.’s operations, by Host L.P.’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, or through the issuance of OP units.

The substantive difference between the filings of Host Inc. and Host L.P. is the fact that Host Inc. is a REIT with public stock, while Host L.P. is a partnership with no publicly traded equity. In the financial statements, this difference primarily is primarily reflected in the equity (or partners’ capital for Host L.P.) section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity (or partners’ capital) and in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) with respect to the manner in which income is allocated to non-controlling interests. Income allocable to the holders of 1.5%approximately 1% of the OP units is reflected as income allocable to non-

i


controllingnon-controlling interests at Host Inc. and within net income at Host LP.L.P. Also, earnings per share generally will be slightly less than the earnings per OP unit, as subsequent to the 2009 common stock election dividend, each Host Inc. common share is the equivalent of .97895 OP units (instead of 1 OP unit). This stock dividend caused an approximate 2% difference in earnings per share when compared to earnings per OP unit beginning in 2010. Apart from these differences, the financial statements of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are nearly identical.

i


To help investors understand the differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P., this report presents the following separate sections or portions of sections for each of Host Inc. and Host L.P.:

Part II Item 5 - Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc. / Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.;

Part II Item 6 - Selected Financial Data;

Part II Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is combined, except for a separate discussion of material differences, if any, in the liquidity and capital resources between Host Inc. and Host L.P.;

Part II Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk is combined, except for separate discussions of material differences, if any, between Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

Part II Item 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. While the financial statements themselves are presented separately, the notes to the financial statements generally are presented separately, the notes to the financial statements are generally combined, except for separate discussions of differences between equity of Host Inc. and capital of Host L.P.

This report also includes separate Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of Host Inc. and Host L.P. in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Host Inc. and the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Host Inc. as the general partner of Host L.P. have made the requisite certifications and that Host Inc. and Host L.P. are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

 

ii


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

Page

Page

Part I

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1A1A.

Risk Factors

18

16

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

35

29

Item 2.

Properties

35

29

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

35

29

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

35

30

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc.

38

32

Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.

40

34

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

41

35

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

42

36

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

43

37

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

90

80

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

93

83

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

147

133

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

147

133

Item 9B.

Other Information

148

133

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

148

134

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

148

134

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder And Unitholder Matters

148

134

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

148

134

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

148

134

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

149

135

 

iii


PART I

Forward Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this 20112014 Form 10-K and in Host Inc.’s 20112014 Annual Report to stockholders contain some forward-looking statements that set forth anticipated results based on management’s plans and assumptions. From time to time, we also provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Such statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events; they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify each such statement by using words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “target,” “forecast” and similar expressions in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these forward-looking statements include those relating to future actions, future acquisitions or dispositions, future capital expenditureexpenditures plans, future performance or results of current and anticipated expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates or the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings.

We cannot guarantee that any future results discussed in any forward-looking statements will be realized, although we believe that we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and potentially inaccurate assumptions, including those discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors.” Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could differ materially from past results and those results anticipated, estimated or projected. You should bear this in mind as you consider forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make or related subjects in our reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also note that, in our risk factors, we provide a cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possibly inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business. These are factors that, individually or in the aggregate, we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from past results and those results anticipated, estimated or projected. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the discussion of risk factors to be a complete discussion of all of the potential risks or uncertainties that could affect our business.

Item  1.

Business

Consolidated PortfolioHost Inc. was incorporated as a Maryland corporation in 1998 and operates as a self-managed and self-administered REIT. Host Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and in which it holds approximately 99% of the partnership interests (“OP units”) as of December 31, 2014. The remaining partnership interests are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. Host Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for Host L.P.’s day-to-day management and control.

As of February 22, 2012,20, 2015, our consolidated lodging portfolio consists of 114 primarily luxury and upper-upscale hotels containing approximately 59,000 rooms, with the majority located in the United States, and with 17 of the properties located outside of the U.S. in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico and New Zealand. In addition, we have 121 hotelsown non-controlling interests in our portfolio, primarily consisting oftwo international joint ventures: a joint venture in Europe, which owns 19 luxury and upper upscale hotels containing 64,947with approximately 6,500 rooms as detailed below:

       Hotels         Rooms   

United States (1)

   105     60,658  

Australia

   1     364  

Brazil

   1     245  

Canada

   4     1,643  

Chile

   2     518  

Mexico

   1     312  

New Zealand

   7     1,207  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   121     64,947  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Includes properties in 25 statesin Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom; and Washington, D.C.

European Joint Venture

We own an interest in a joint venture in Europe (the “Euro JV”) thatAsia/Pacific, which owns luxuryone upscale hotel in Australia and upperminority interests in three operating hotels, two upscale and one midscale, in India and four additional hotels in India currently under development. We also hold non-controlling investments in two separate funds. We own a 32.1% interest in Fund I (11 hotels 3,512 rooms) and a 33.4% interesttimeshare joint venture.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to be the premier lodging real estate company and to generate superior total returns for our stockholders through a combination of appreciation in Fund II (twoasset values, growth in earnings and dividend distributions.  To achieve this objective, we seek to:

·

Own a high-quality portfolio of hotel real estate primarily located in our target markets;

·

Create value in our existing portfolio through well-integrated asset management and capital investment;

·

Allocate and recycle capital with discipline to earn returns that exceed our cost of capital;

·

Maintain a flexible capital structure that fosters external growth even through a downturn; and

·

Align our organizational structure with our business objectives to be an employer of choice and a responsible corporate citizen.


Portfolio Management. We will focus on refining our portfolio to include multiple types of hotels, 676 rooms).but in a defined set of target markets that meet our investment criteria. This will provide the opportunity for a more comprehensive understanding of our target markets which we believe will increase the probability of earning premium returns over time.  

·

Our target markets will be those locations which we believe have strong demand generators that appeal to multiple customer segments, achieve premium rates and relatively higher barriers to entry that limit new supply. While we continually will evaluate and refine our target market list, we generally focus on domestic gateway cities and resort markets, including New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Florida, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, Houston and Hawaii. These target markets historically have outperformed the overall U.S. lodging industry in terms of real revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) growth, although there can be no assurances that this outperformance will continue for any number of reasons, including changes in travel patterns or supply in those markets. We also will continue investing internationally, either through direct acquisitions or through joint ventures with strategic partners. We believe international expansion provides us the opportunity to earn favorable risk-adjusted returns and diversify our portfolio. Our international target markets include Western Europe (through our European joint venture), Australia, Singapore, Mexico and Brazil. We believe these markets will continue to see more favorable supply/demand and pricing dynamics in the future. The following chart details the long-term performance of our domestic target markets over the past 20 years:

·

Establishing a deeper foothold through a concentrated market approach is intended to create efficiencies and increase our knowledge of local market dynamics, data and relationships.  We will continue primarily to own upper upscale and luxury hotels that we believe benefit from multiple segments of demand. However, we also will broaden the types of assets we consider owning to include urban, select-service hotels and lifestyle or “boutique” hotels which appeal to the transient customer. We believe focusing on several different hotel types within our target markets will provide the opportunity to capitalize on the evolving nature of the hotel customer.  

·

We will strive for balanced market exposure. Our general goal is that 80% to 90% of our portfolio revenues will come from hotels located within our target markets, which will allow us the flexibility to make opportunistic investments in alternative locations and to continue to hold certain legacy assets that we expect will perform well over time.

·

Through our disciplined approach to acquisitions and new development we seek to achieve unlevered returns that exceed our cost of capital. Generally, we will look to invest capital early in the lodging cycle and benefit from the subsequent industry-wide increase in values. As we move further into the lodging cycle, we will increase our focus on opportunities where we believe we can add value through redevelopment, repositioning or new development.  

·

We will look to reallocate our portfolio toward target markets through our disposition strategy.  Generally, our dispositions will be focused on secondary or tertiary markets. Additionally, we will dispose of properties where we believe the potential for growth is constrained or of properties with significant capital expenditures requirements where we do not believe we would generate a significant return on the investment. Prior to the sale of assets, we will look for opportunities to increase the sales price, which may include value-added capital expenditures projects and ground lease


extensions. We also will look to take advantage of opportunities to capture attractive pricing for hotels that have management contract flexibility. We also may dispose of assets in our target markets through direct sales or through the creation of joint ventures when we have the opportunity to capitalize on value enhancement strategies and apply the proceeds to other business objectives.

Asset Management. As the owner of a large and diverse portfolio of properties, we believe we are in a unique position to work with our managers to drive operating profit through revenue growth strategies and cost control initiatives. The hotels are locatedsize and composition of our portfolio and our affiliation with most of the leading brands and operators in the following countries:

       Hotels         Rooms   

Italy

   3     1,053  

Spain

   2     950  

United Kingdom

   2     630  

Belgium

   3     539  

France

   1     396  

Poland

   1     350  

The Netherlands

   1     270  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   13     4,188  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

industry allow us to benchmark similar hotels and identify best practices and efficiencies that can improve long-term profitability. We arealso carefully evaluate and monitor our property agreements, including our management and franchise agreements, in an effort to obtain flexibility and drive overall value.  Ultimately, our goal is to differentiate our assets within their competitive market, drive operating performance and enhance the general partnervalue of the Euro JV. real estate.

·

Work with leading brands, as well as independent operators, in the lodging industry and actively seek to diversify within our portfolio. We will look to capitalize on situations where we have management agreement flexibility to appropriately match a hotel and its operator, brand and contract terms.  This will include new relationships with independent operators that may be an improved fit for smaller or unbranded products.

·

Drive revenue growth by conducting detailed strategic reviews with our managers on market pricing and segment mix to develop the appropriate group/transient mix and market share targets for each property. We also work with our managers to ensure that their brands’ on-line presence addresses a broad customer base, including group customers and overseas travelers.

·

Enhance profitability by using our proprietary business intelligence system to benchmark and monitor hotel performance and cost controls and complete deep-dive analytic reviews to identify new opportunities that could increase profit.

·

Improve contract flexibility through the extension or purchase of ground leases or the restructuring of management agreements to enhance overall value.  

·

Strategically position food & beverage outlets through initiatives such as combining bars and restaurants to create a more relevant experience for consumers throughout the day or outsourcing outlets when a viable partnership may improve profitability and increase our customer base.

Capital Investment. We actfocus on creating and mining value from our existing portfolio through capital investments and value enhancement initiatives. These projects may include significant changes to rooms, public space and meeting space, as well as a repositioning of the asset manager forproperty under a different operator or brand. We work closely with our managers to time these projects so as to attempt to reduce disruption to operations and environmental impacts.

·

Value Enhancement Initiatives seek to achieve the highest and best use of our properties. These projects may include the development of timeshare, office space or condominium units on excess land, redevelopment or expansion of existing retail space, and the acquisition of air rights or development entitlements.

·

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Projects are designed to take advantage of changing market conditions and the favorable location of our properties and seek to increase profitability and enhance customer satisfaction. Our capital expenditures projects generally fall into the following categories:

Redevelopment projects. These projects are designed to improve the positioning of our hotels within their markets and for a hotel not owned by us competitive set. Redevelopment projects include extensive renovations of guest rooms and bathrooms, lobbies, food and beverage outlets; expanding and/or the Euro JV, a 440 room property in Paris, France, in exchange for a fee.

Asian Joint Ventureextensive renovation of ballroom and meeting rooms; major mechanical system upgrades, and green building initiatives and certifications.

Targeted Return on Investment (ROI) projects. These projects often are smaller and focused on increasing space profitability or lowering net operating costs. Typical ROI projects include converting unprofitable or underutilized space into meeting space, adding guestrooms, and implementing energy and water conservation measures such as LED lighting, guestroom water efficient fixtures, and building automation systems.

·

Acquisition Capital Expenditures Projects are completed in connection with the acquisition of a property.  For each new acquisition, we prepare capital and operational improvement plans designed to improve profitability and enhance the guest experience. These projects may include required renewal and replacement projects, significant redevelopment and even re-branding of the property and represent a key component of our decision to invest in a hotel. These projects typically are completed within two to three years of acquisition.


·

Renewal and Replacement Capital Expenditures are designed to maintain the quality and competitiveness of our hotel properties.  Typically, room renovations occur at intervals of approximately seven years, but the timing may vary based on the type of property and equipment being renovated. These renovations generally are divided into the following types: soft goods, case goods, bathroom and infrastructure. Soft goods include items such as carpeting, bed spreads, curtains and wall vinyl and may require more frequent updates in order to maintain brand quality standards. Case goods include items such as dressers, desks, couches, restaurant and meeting room chairs and tables; which generally are not replaced as frequently. Bathroom renovations include the replacement of tile, vanity, lighting and plumbing fixtures. Infrastructure includes the physical plant of the hotel, including the roof, elevators/escalators, façade, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems and fire systems.

Financing Strategy.  In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gain, but including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash) to its stockholders and, as a result, generally relies on external sources of capital, as well as cash from operations, to finance growth. We ownuse a 25% interest in an Asianvariety of debt and equity instruments to fund our external growth, including senior notes and mortgage debt, exchangeable debentures, common and preferred stock offerings, issuances of OP units and joint venture (the “Asian JV”) that has made a non-controlling investment in a joint venture in Indiaventures/limited partnerships to develop seven hotels, totaling approximately 1,750 rooms, in three major cities in India, Bengaluru, Chennai and Delhi. The hotelstake advantage of the prevailing market conditions.

·

Management believes that a strong balance sheet is a key competitive advantage that affords us a lower cost of capital and positions us for external growth. While we may issue debt at any time, generally we will target a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, (or “Leverage Ratio,” as defined in our credit facility) of 2.5x to 3.0x and to maintain an investment grade rating on our senior unsecured debt. We believe the investment grade rating and lower leverage will deliver the most consistent access to capital, thereby providing us with the necessary flexibility to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging cycle.

·

We seek to structure our debt profile to allow us to access different forms of financing, primarily senior notes and exchangeable debentures, as well as mortgage debt (particularly outside of the U.S. when debt is priced reasonably and can be denominated in the local currency). Generally, this means we look to minimize the number of assets that are encumbered by mortgage debt, minimize near-term maturities and maintain a balanced maturity schedule. We may seek to issue debt in foreign currencies to match the proceeds with their intended use in order to reduce the potential costs of international investing related to currency fluctuation and local taxes. Depending on market conditions, we also may utilize variable rate debt which can provide greater protection during a decline in the lodging industry. Generally we will target our floating rate debt to be 20% to 35% of total debt, in part depending on our outlook on future interest rates.

·

We expect to continue to utilize joint ventures to finance external growth. We believe joint ventures provide a significant means to access external capital and spread the inherent risk of hotel ownership. Our primary focus for joint ventures is in international markets, which helps to diversify exposure to market risk.

Corporate Responsibility. Our corporate responsibility program is managed by Accor under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands. The first two hotels are expected to fully open by March of 2012.

Other Real Estate Investments

Our other real estate investments represent less than 1% of our overall assets and approximately 5% of our overall revenues. We lease 53 Courtyard by Marriott select-service hotels from Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) that are located in 24 states in the United States. We have given notice that we intend to terminate these leases on December 31, 2012. Additionally, we own €64 million ($87 million) face amount of the two most junior tranches of a mortgage note receivable secured by six hotels in Europe. The loan matures in October of 2012.

Where to Find Additional Information

The address of our principal executive office is 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817. Our phone number is 240-744-1000. We maintain an internet website at: www.hosthotels.com. Through our website, we make available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Our website also is a key source of important information about us. We routinely post to the Investor Relations section of our website important information about our business, our operating results and our financial condition and prospects, including, for example, information about material acquisitions and dispositions, our earnings releases and certain supplemental financial information related or complimentary thereto. The website also has a Governance page in the Investor Relations section that includes, among other things, copies of our By-laws, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy for our directors, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy for employees, our Corporate Governance GuidelinesResponsibility team, led by our Executive Vice President, Human Resources and the charters for each standing committee of Host Inc.’s Board of Directors, which currently are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Policy CommitteeManaging Director, Global Development, Design and Construction and overseen by our CEO and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. CopiesCommittee of these chartersthe Board of Directors. Our corporate responsibility program focuses on the management of the environmental, social and policies, Host Inc.’s By-lawsgovernance risks and Host L.P.’s partnership agreement are also available in print to stockholdersopportunities for our business and unitholders upon request to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland 20817, Attn: Secretary. Please note thatis organized around the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, any document, unless expressly incorporated by reference therein.

The discussion of our Businessfollowing themes and Properties should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Part II Item 8 of this report.objectives:

Responsible Investment: We incorporate sustainability into our asset management approach. During the acquisition of new properties, we assess both sustainability opportunities and climate change related risks as part of our due diligence process. During the ownership of our properties, we seek to invest in proven sustainability practices in our redevelopment and ROI projects that can enhance asset value while also improving environmental performance.

Environmental Stewardship: We seek to improve the environmental footprint of our properties.  We have established goals to reduce energy use and carbon emissions from 2008 levels by 12 percent and water use by 15 percent by 2017 across our portfolio. As part of our asset management approach, we work closely with our hotel managers to monitor environmental performance and support implementation of operational best practices.  In our redevelopment and ROI projects, we target specific environmental efficiency projects, equipment upgrades and replacements that reduce energy and water consumption and offer appropriate returns on investment.

Corporate Citizenship: We are committed to being a responsible corporate citizen and strengthening our local communities. We do this through financial support, community engagement, volunteer service, and industry collaboration. Our approach to corporate citizenship is reinforced by our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and periodic engagement with key stakeholders to understand their corporate responsibility priorities.


The Lodging Industry

The lodging industry in the United States consists of private and public entities that operate in an extremely diversified market under a variety of brand names. The lodging industry has several key participants:

Owners—own the hotel and typically enter into an agreement for an independent third party to manage the hotel. These properties may be branded and operated under the manager’s brand or branded under a franchise agreement and operated by the franchisee or by an independent hotel manager. The properties also may be operated as an independent hotel (unaffiliated with any brand) by an independent hotel manager.

Owner/Managers—own the hotel and operate the property with their own management team. These properties may be branded under a franchise agreement, operated as an independent hotel (unaffiliated with any brand) or operated under the owner’s brand. We are restrictedprohibited from operating and managing hotels under applicable REIT rules.

Franchisors—own a brand or brands and strive to grow their revenues by expanding the number of hotels in their franchise system. Franchisors provide their branded hotels with brand recognition, marketing support and centralized reservation systems.systems for the franchised hotels.

Franchisor/Managers—own a brand or brands and also operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner or franchisee.

ManagerManagers—operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner, but do not, themselves, own a brand. The hotels may be operated under a franchise agreement or as an independent hotel unaffiliated with any brand.hotel.

The hotel manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the hotels,hotel, including the employment of hotel staff, the determination of room rates, the development of sales and marketing plans, the preparation of operating and capital expenditureexpenditures budgets and the preparation of financial reports for the owner. TheyThe hotel manager typically receivereceives fees based on the revenues and profitability of the hotel.

Supply and Demand Trends.Our industry is influenced by the cyclical relationship between the supply of and demand for hotel rooms. Lodging demand growth typically is related to the vitality of the overall economy, in addition to local market factors that stimulate travel to specific destinations. In particular, trends in economic indicators such as GDP growth, business investment and employment growth are somekey indicators of the primary driversrelative strength of lodging demand. Between 2003 and 2007, broad growth in the economy led to increases in demand. However, the global recession that began in the second half of 2008 and lasted throughout much of 2009 resulted in a considerable decline in both consumer and business spending and a severe decline in demand within the lodging industry. During 2010, economic indicators began to improve due to strengthening GDP and business investment, although these improvements have been tempered by continued high-unemployment. While lodging demand has not recovered fully from the steep declines experienced in 2008 and 2009, the recovery that began in 2010 has continued into 2011, led by transient demand from business and leisure travelers. We expect demand and RevPAR to grow in 2012, though the rate of growth may be affected by uncertainty in the direction of the global economy, particularly with regard to the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Europe.

Lodging supply growth generally is generally driven by overall lodging demand, as extended periods of strong demand growth tend to encourage new development. However, the rate of supply growth also is influenced by a number of additional factors, including the availability of capital, interest rates, construction costs and unique market considerations. The relatively long lead-time required to complete the development of hotels makes supply growth

easier to forecast than demand growth, but increases the volatility of the cyclical behavior of the lodging industry. As illustrated in the charts below for the U.S. lodging industry, at different points in the cycle, demand and supply may increase or decrease in a dissimilar manner such that demand may increase when there is no new supply or supply may grow when demand is declining. Beginning in the second half of 2008, the stress in the credit markets made financing for new hotel construction extremely difficult to obtain. This, coupled with the decline in lodging demand during 2008 and 2009 due to the global economic recession, caused a significant reduction in new hotel construction starts. As a result, supply growth was relatively low in 2010 and 2011, and we expect growth through 2013 to be well below the historical growth rate of 2.0% (based on data from Smith Travel Research over the past 25 years). In addition, we anticipate that demand growth will exceed supply growth during this period, resulting in occupancy gains, which is consistent with analysis prepared by PKF Hospitality Research.


Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is an operational measure commonly used in the hotel industry to evaluate hotel performance. RevPAR represents the product of the average daily room rate charged and the average daily occupancy achieved, but excludes other revenue generated by a hotel property, such as food and beverage, parking and other revenues. Average daily room rate (“ADR”) reflects the average rate charged by hotels. Average rates can be influenced by, among other things, demand, previously negotiated contracts, the overall mix of business and new supply in a given market.

The charts below detail the historical supply, demand and RevPAR growth for the U.S. lodging industry and for the upper upscale segment for 2007 to 2011 and forecast data for 2012. Historical industry trends have indicated that hotels in the upper upscale segment have generally outperformed the lodging industry in terms of RevPAR growth over time, although, in 2011, the upper-upscale segment slightly underperformed the lodging industry. Our portfolio primarily consists of upper upscale hotels and, accordingly, its performance is best understood in comparison to the upper upscale segment rather than the entire industry. The charts below detail the historical supply, demand and RevPAR growth for the U.S. lodging industry and for the U.S. upper upscale segment for 2010 to 2014 and forecast data for 2015:

U.S. Lodging Industry Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

U.S. Upper Upscale Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

Business Strategy

Our primary long-term business objective is to provide superior total returns to our equity holders through a combination of appreciation in asset values, growth in earnings and dividend distributions. To achieve this objective, we seek to:

 


acquire properties in urbanManagers and resort/conference destinations that are operated by leading management companies. These investments primarily will be located in gateway cities with significant appeal to multiple customer segments. While we will continue to focus on luxury and upper upscale hotel properties in our target markets, we intend to expand our investments to include the acquisition or development of midscale and upscale properties, particularly in urban or foreign markets;

strategically invest in major redevelopment and return on investment (“ROI”) projects in order to maximize the inherent value in our portfolio;

drive operating results at our properties through aggressive asset management;

maintain a strong balance sheet with a low leverage level and balanced debt maturities in order to minimize the cost of capital and to maximize our financial flexibility in order to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging business cycle;

expand our global portfolio holdings and revenue sources through joint ventures or direct acquisitions that diversify our investments; and

recycle capital through the disposition of non-core assets, including hotels that are at competitive risk or that are located in suburban or slower-growth markets, or to opportunistically dispose of core properties to take advantage of market conditions.

Acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy focuses on acquiring hotels in both foreign and domestic markets at attractive yields that exceed our cost of capital. Domestically, our core acquisition strategy will continue to focus on upper upscale and luxury hotel properties located in the central business districts of key gateway cities and

prominent resort locations with high barriers to entry as, historically, these properties have demonstrated higher RevPAR growth. In addition, we are discussing select-service hotel development opportunities with strategic development partners in order to leverage our growth strategy. In the European markets, our acquisition targets will continue to be concentrated in the upper upscale and luxury segments. In the fast-growing emerging markets, primarily Asia-Pacific and South America (particularly Brazil), in addition to acquiring upper upscale properties, we also will pursue the acquisition or development of midscale and upscale hotels, as we believe the limited supply of quality lodging products in these markets creates an opportunity for solid returns on this type of investment.

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Projects.We pursue opportunities to enhance asset value by completing select capital improvements outside the scope of recurring renewal and replacement capital expenditures. In a typical year, these investments may represent 40% to 50% or more of our capital expenditures. These projects are designed to take advantage of changing market conditions and the favorable location of our properties to enhance customer satisfaction and increase profitability. We evaluate our capital expenditure projects based on their economic, environmental and social impact. In collaboration with our hotel managers, we continually evaluate new products and systems designed to yield predictable and targeted results, while improving overall energy efficiency. Examples of these technologies include: co-generation plants, laundry waste water recycling systems, elevator modernizations, building automation systems and controls, EPA ENERGY STAR® qualified appliances and electronics, EPA WaterSense® labeled plumbing fixtures, energy efficient lighting, sustainable construction practices and using materials made from recycled content.

Redevelopment projects.These projects are designed to optimally position our hotels within their respective markets and within their competitive set. Redevelopment projects include, for example, extensive renovations of guest rooms, including bathrooms, lobbies, food and beverage outlets, expanding ballroom and meeting rooms, and major mechanical system upgrades.

Targeted Return on Investment Projects.These projects often are smaller and focused on specific areas, such as converting unprofitable or underutilized space into meeting space or adding guestrooms. We also target projects that improve energy efficiency through the implementation and adoption of proven sustainable technologies and operational practices.

Value enhancement projects. We seek opportunities to enhance the value of our portfolio by identifying and executing strategies that maximize the highest and best use of all aspects of our hotels. These projects include the development of timeshare or condominium units on excess land, or the acquisition of air rights or development entitlements that add value to our portfolio or enhance its value in the event that we sell the hotel.

Acquisition Projects. Generally, in connection with an acquisition, we prepare a capital improvement plan that we believe will enhance profitability. These near-term projects may include required renewal and replacement projects or significant redevelopment and even re-branding of the property and represent a key component of our decision to invest in a hotel.

Asset Management. As Host Inc. is the nation’s largest lodging REIT with a diverse portfolio of luxury and upper upscale properties, we are in a unique position to work with the managers of our hotels in order to maximize revenues, while minimizing operating costs. The size and composition of our portfolio and our affiliation with most of the leading operators and brands in the industry allow us to benchmark similar hotels and identify best practices and identify efficiencies that can be implemented at our properties. Areas of focus include enhancing revenue management for rooms, food and beverage and other services, reducing operating costs and identifying operating efficiencies, all of which improve the long-term profitability of the hotel.

Another key component of our asset management strategy focuses on maintaining the high standards of product quality of our properties. We work closely with our managers to ensure that renewal and replacement expenditures are spent efficiently in order to maximize the profitability of the hotel. Typically, room refurbishments occur at intervals of approximately seven years, but the timing may vary based on the type of property and equipment being replaced. These refurbishments generally are divided into the following types: soft goods, case goods and infrastructure. Soft goods include items such as carpeting, bed spreads, curtains and wall vinyl and may require more frequent updates in order to maintain brand quality standards. Case goods include items such as dressers, desks, couches, restaurant and meeting room chairs and tables and generally are not replaced as frequently. Infrastructure includes the physical plant of the hotel, including the roof, elevators, façade and fire systems, which regularly are maintained and then replaced at the end of their useful lives.

Capital structure and liquidity profile. As a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gain) to its stockholders, and, as a result, generally must rely on external sources of capital to finance growth. We use a variety of debt and equity instruments in order to fund our external growth, including senior notes and mortgage debt, exchangeable debentures, common and preferred stock offerings, issuances of Host L.P. partnership units and joint ventures/limited partnerships to best take advantage of the prevailing market conditions. While we may issue debt at any time in order to take advantage of favorable market conditions, management believes it is prudent, over time, to continue to lower our leverage level. We believe lower overall leverage will reduce our cost of capital and earnings volatility, and provides us with the necessary flexibility to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging cycle, which we consider a key competitive advantage. Currently, we will look to fund the majority of our investments with proceeds from equity offerings and cash from dispositions.

We also seek to structure our debt profile to allow us to access different forms of financing, primarily senior notes and exchangeable debentures, as well as mortgage debt. Generally, this means we will look to minimize the number of assets that are encumbered by mortgage debt, minimize near-term maturities and maintain a balanced maturity schedule.

Joint Ventures.We expect to continue to utilize joint ventures to finance external growth. We believe joint ventures provide a significant means to access external capital and spread the inherent risk of hotel ownership. Our primary focus for joint ventures is in foreign markets, such as in Europe and Asia, which will help to diversify exposure to market risk. We also may explore joint venture opportunities in North America and Latin America.

Dispositions. Our disposition strategy focuses on properties where we believe the potential for growth is constrained or on properties with significant capital expenditure requirements where we do not believe we would generate a significant return on the investment. Primarily, these properties are located in secondary and tertiary markets, as opposed to our target markets of urban and resort locations. However, we also may dispose of assets in our primary markets through direct sales or through the creation of joint ventures, as described above, when we have the opportunity to capitalize on value enhancement strategies and apply the proceeds to other business objectives. Proceeds from dispositions are deployed to repay debt, fund acquisitions and/or ROI/redevelopment projects.

Corporate Responsibility

Host’s sustainability strategy integrates fiscal responsibility with environmental and social responsibility on both the corporate and portfolio levels. Our environmental goals are to reduce overall carbon emissions, energy consumption, water use and waste in our hotels. We pursue these goals through capital investments, sustainable design and renovations and by encouraging our hotel managers to implement and embrace sustainable operational practices.

Partnering closely with our hotel managers to attain each brand’s specific energy reduction targets, we seek to maximize the efficiency of existing systems and equipment through energy audits and retro-commissioning (RCx) studies. Through these processes, we identify proven energy conservation technologies and products that we seek to replicate, where applicable, across our portfolio through our capital projects. Our internal development, design and engineering teams strive to select sustainable construction materials that require less maintenance and last longer, recycle carpets and wall coverings, and frequently use products with recycled content. We may also specify and purchase EPA ENERGY STAR® qualified appliances, electronics and reflective roofing systems and ship materials using EPA’s Smart Way trucking companies.

Operating Structure

Host Inc. operates through an umbrella partnership REIT structure in which substantially all of its properties and assets are held by Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and holds approximately 98.5% of the OP units. As a result of the stock dividend in December 2009, which affected the conversion ratio of OP units to

Host Inc. common stock, each OP unit owned by holders other than Host Inc. is redeemable, at the option of the holder, for an amount of cash equal to the market value of one share of Host Inc. common stock multiplied by a factor of 1.021494 (as opposed to a conversion factor of 1 share/unit that existed prior to the stock dividend). Host Inc. has the right to acquire any OP unit offered for redemption directly from the holder in exchange for 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock, instead of Host L.P. redeeming such OP unit for cash. Additionally, for every share of common stock issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue .97895 OP units to Host Inc. As of December 31, 2011, non-controlling partners held 10.5 million OP units, which were convertible into 10.7 million Host Inc. common shares. Assuming that all non-controlling interests were converted into common shares, there would have been 715.8 million common shares of Host Inc. outstanding at December 31, 2011. When distinguishing between Host Inc. and Host L.P., the primary difference is the approximately 1.5% of OP units not held by Host Inc. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition—Distribution/Dividend Policy”.

Our operating structure is as follows:

Because Host Inc. is a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income that Host Inc. can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. As a result, we lease substantially all of our consolidated properties to certain of our subsidiaries designated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) for federal income tax purposes or to third party lessees. Our TRS are subject to income tax and are therefore not limited as to the amount of non-qualifying income they can generate. The lessees and our TRS enter into agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the hotels. Our TRS also may own assets engaging in other activities that produce non-qualifying income, such as the development of timeshare or condominium units, subject to certain restrictions. The difference between the hotels’ net operating cash flow and the aggregate rents paid to Host L.P. is retained by our TRS as taxable income. Accordingly, the net effect of the TRS leases is that, while, as a REIT, Host Inc. is generally exempt from federal income tax to the extent that it meets specific distribution requirements, among other REIT requirements, a portion of the net operating cash flow from our properties is subject to federal, state and, if applicable, foreign income tax.

Our Hotel Properties

Overview. We have 121 hotels in our portfolio, primarily consisting of luxury and upper upscale properties. These hotels generally are located in the central business districts of major cities, near airports and resort/conference destinations that, because of their locations, typically benefit from barriers to entry for new supply. These properties typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, swimming pools, exercise facilities and/or spas, gift shops and parking facilities, the combination of which enable them to serve business, leisure and group travelers. Forty-five of our hotels, representing approximately 63% of our revenues, have in excess of 500 rooms. The average age of our properties is 28 years, although substantially all of the properties have benefited from significant renovations or major additions, as well as regularly scheduled renewal and replacement and other capital improvements.

The following chart details our consolidated hotel portfolio by brand as of February 22, 2012:

Brand

  Number
of Hotels
   Rooms   Percentage of
Revenues(1)
 

Marriott

   66     38,013     54

Ritz-Carlton

   8     3,018     8  

Starwood:

      

Sheraton

   7     5,441     8  

Westin

   13     6,899     10  

W

   3     1,382     3  

St. Regis

   1     232     1  

The Luxury Collection

   1     139     —    

Hyatt

   7     5,481     9  

Fairmont

   1     450     2  

Four Seasons

   2     608     1  

Hilton/Embassy Suites

   3     1,042     1  

Swissôtel

   1     661     1  

Delta

   1     374     1  

Accor

      

ibis

   3     455     —    

Novotel

   4     752     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   121     64,947     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Percentage of revenues is based on 2011 revenues. No individual property contributed more than 7% of total revenues in 2011.

Hotel Properties. The following table sets forth the location and number of rooms of our 121 hotels as of February 22, 2012:

Location

Rooms

Arizona

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

243

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

270

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

281

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

732

California

Coronado Island Marriott Resort (1)

300

Costa Mesa Marriott

253

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

884

Hyatt Regency San Francisco, Burlingame

789

Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego (1)

1,625

Manhattan Beach Marriott (1)

385

Marina del Rey Marriott (1)

370

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

532

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

254

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina (1)

1,360

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

350

San Francisco Airport Marriott

685

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

285

San Francisco Marriott Marquis (1)

1,499

San Ramon Marriott (1)

368

Santa Clara Marriott (1)

759

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina (1)

1,053

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey (1)

304

The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco

336

The Westin Los Angeles Airport (1)

740

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

512

The Westin South Coast Plaza (2)

390

Colorado

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

628

Denver Marriott West (1)

305

The Westin Denver Downtown

430

Connecticut

Hartford Marriott Rocky Hill (1)

251

Florida

Tampa Airport Marriott (1)

296

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa (1)(3)

650

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

223

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay (1)

600

Orlando World Center Marriott Resort & Convention Center

2,000

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

719

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

444

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

450

The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples

295

Georgia

Atlanta Marriott Marquis

1,663

Location

Rooms

Georgia (cont.)

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown (1)

254

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

400

Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta

244

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

439

JW Marriott Buckhead Atlanta

371

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

510

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

365

Hawaii

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa on Kaanapali Beach

806

The Fairmont Kea Lani Maui

450

Illinois

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

254

Chicago Downtown Courtyard River North

337

Chicago Marriott O’Hare

681

Chicago Marriott Suites O’Hare

256

Embassy Suites Chicago-Downtown/Lakefront

455

Swissôtel Chicago

661

The Westin Chicago River North

424

Indiana

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing (1)

395

The Westin Indianapolis

573

Louisiana

New Orleans Marriott

1,329

Maryland

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

284

Massachusetts

Boston Marriott Copley Place (1)

1,145

Hyatt Regency Cambridge

470

Sheraton Boston Hotel

1,220

Sheraton Needham Hotel

247

The Westin Waltham-Boston

346

Minnesota

Minneapolis Marriott City Center (1)

583

Missouri

Kansas City Airport Marriott (1)

384

New Hampshire

Courtyard Nashua

245

New Jersey

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott (1)

591

Park Ridge Marriott (1)

289

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

370

New York

New York Helmsley Hotel

773

New York Marriott Downtown

497

Location

Rooms

New York (cont.)

New York Marriott Marquis Times Square (4)

1,949

Sheraton New York Hotel & Towers

1,777

W New York

688

W New York – Union Square (3)

270

North Carolina

Greensboro-Highpoint Marriott Airport (1)

299

Ohio

Dayton Marriott

399

The Westin Cincinnati (1)

456

Oregon

Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront

503

Pennsylvania

Four Seasons Hotel Philadelphia

364

Philadelphia Airport Marriott (1)

419

Philadelphia Marriott Downtown (3)

1,408

Tennessee

Memphis Marriott Downtown

600

Texas

Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum by the Galleria

547

Houston Airport Marriott (1)

565

Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center (1)

386

JW Marriott Hotel Houston Galleria

515

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter (1)

1,001

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk (1)

512

St. Regis Hotel, Houston

232

Virginia

Hyatt Regency Reston

518

Key Bridge Marriott (1)

582

Arlington Pentagon City Residence Inn

299

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner (1)

398

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott (1)

368

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

336

Washington

Seattle Airport Marriott

459

Location

Rooms

Washington (cont.)

The Westin Seattle

891

W Seattle

424

Washington, D.C.

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

834

JW Marriott Washington DC

772

Marriott at Metro Center

459

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

267

Australia

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1) (3)

364

Brazil

JW Marriott Rio de Janeiro

245

Canada

Calgary Marriott

384

Delta Meadowvale Resort & Conference Centre

374

Toronto Marriott Airport (3)

424

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre (1)

461

Chile

San Cristobal Tower, Santiago

139

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center

379

Mexico

JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City (3)

312

New Zealand

Novotel Auckland Ellerslie

147

ibis Ellerslie

100

Novotel Wellington

139

ibis Wellington

200

Novotel Queenstown Lakeside

273

Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square (1)

193

ibis Christchurch (1)

155

Total

64,947

(1)The land on which this hotel is built is leased from a third party under one or more long-term lease agreements.
(2)The land, building and improvements are leased from a third party under a long-term lease agreement.
(3)This property is not wholly owned.
(4)This property is subject to a ground lease under which we have the option to purchase the land for an incremental payment of $19.9 million through 2017.

Competition

The lodging industry is highly competitive. Competition is often specific to individual markets and is based on a number of factors, including location, brand, guest facilities and amenities, level of service, room rates and the quality of accommodations. The lodging industry generally is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. The classification of a property is based on lodging industry standards, which take into consideration many factors such as guest facilities and amenities, level of service and quality of accommodations. Most of our hotels operate in urban and resort markets either as luxury properties under such brand names as Ritz-Carlton®, Fairmont®, Four Seasons®, The Luxury Collection®, St. Regis® and W®, or as upper upscale properties under such brand names as Marriott®, Hyatt®, Westin®, Hilton®, Sheraton®, Swissôtel®, Pullman® and Delta®. We also may selectively invest in midscale and upscale properties such as ibis®, Novotel®, Hyatt Place®, Four Points by Sheraton®, Hilton Garden Inn®, Fairfield Inn by Marriott® or Courtyard by Marriott®, particularly in foreign markets.(1) While our hotels primarily compete with other hotels in the luxury and upper upscale segments, they also may compete with hotels in other lower-tier segments.

We believe our properties enjoy competitive advantages associated with the hotel brands under which they operate. The international marketing programs and reservation systems of these brands, combined with the strong management systems and expertise they provide, should enable our properties to perform favorably in terms of both occupancy and room rates. In addition, repeat guest business is enhanced by guest reward or guest recognition programs offered by most of these brands. Nevertheless, many management contracts for our hotels do not prohibit our managers from converting, franchising or developing other hotel properties in our markets. As a result, our hotels in a given market often compete with other hotels that our managers may own, invest in, manage or franchise.

We also compete with other REITs and other public and private investors for the acquisition of new properties and investment opportunities, in both domestic and foreign markets, as we attempt to position our portfolio to take best advantage of changes in markets and travel patterns of our customers.

Seasonality

Our hotel sales traditionally have experienced moderate seasonality, which varies based on the individual property and the region. Additionally, hotel revenues for our domestic Marriott-managed hotels typically reflect approximately 16 weeks of results in the fourth quarter compared to approximately 12 weeks for each of the first three quarters of the year. For our non-Marriott managed hotels, the first quarter includes two months of operations, the second and third quarters include three months of operations and the fourth quarter includes four months of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Reporting Periods” for more information on our fiscal calendar. Hotel sales have historically averaged approximately 20%, 26%, 22% and 32% for the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.

(1)This annual report contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners, which are companies other than us. None of the owners of these trademarks, their affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, agents or employees, has or will have any responsibility or liability for any information contained in this annual report.

Other Real Estate Investments

European Joint Venture.We own a general and limited partnership interest in the Euro JV with APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). Effective June 27, 2011, the partners agreed to expand the Euro JV through the creation of a second fund, Fund II, in which each of the current partners holds a 33.3% limited partner interest and we hold the 0.1% general partner interest. We hold a 32.0% limited partner interest and a 0.1% general partner interest in Fund I. The Euro JV also acts as the asset manager for the hotels owned by the Euro JV, as well as one hotel in Paris, France, in exchange for a fee. As of February 22, 2012, the Euro JV owns the following hotels:

Hotel

CityCountryRooms/Units

Fund I:

Hotel Arts Barcelona

BarcelonaSpain483

The Westin Palace, Madrid

MadridSpain467

The Westin Palace, Milan

MilanItaly228

The Westin Europa & Regina

VeniceItaly185

Sheraton Roma Hotel & Conference Center

RomeItaly640

Sheraton Skyline Hotel & Conference Centre

HayesUnited Kingdom350

Sheraton Warsaw Hotel & Towers

WarsawPoland350

Renaissance Brussels Hotel

BrusselsBelgium262

Brussels Marriott Hotel

BrusselsBelgium221

Marriott Executive Apartments

BrusselsBelgium56

Crowne Plaza Hotel Amsterdam City Centre

AmsterdamThe Netherlands270

Fund I total rooms

3,512

Fund II:

Le Méridien Piccadilly

LondonUnited Kingdom280

Pullman Bercy Paris

ParisFrance396

Fund II total rooms

676

Total European joint venture rooms

4,188

Asian Joint Venture.We own a 25% interest in the Asian JV with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. During 2011, our Asian JV invested approximately $53 million (of which our share was $13.3 million) of its $65 million commitment to acquire a 36% interest in a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited. This joint venture is developing seven properties, totaling approximately 1,750 rooms in three major cities in India: Bengaluru, Chennai and Delhi, and will be managed by Accor under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands. The first two hotels are expected to be opened fully by March of 2012.

Other Investments.In addition to the joint ventures described above, we have the following real estate investments:

On April 13, 2010, we acquired, at a discount, the two most junior tranches of a €427 million ($581 million) mortgage loan that is secured by six hotels located in Europe, with a face value of €64 million ($87 million). The loan matures on October 20, 2012.

We own a leasehold interest in 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties which were sold to HPT and leased back to us in 1995. In conjunction with our conversion to a REIT, in 1999 we entered into a sublease with respect to these properties with a third party on similar terms. We terminated the subleases effective July 6, 2010 and subsequently act as the owner under the management agreements. We gave notice of our intent to cancel the leases effective December 31, 2012.

For additional detail of our other real estate investments, including a summary of the outstanding debt balances of our affiliates, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligation” and Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Investments in Affiliates” and Note 7 “Leases” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Operations

Excluding hotels owned by our European and Asian joint ventures, as of December 31, 2011, we own one property in Australia, one property in Brazil, four in Canada, one in Mexico, two in Chile, and seven in New Zealand, which collectively contain approximately 4,289 rooms. Approximately 6%, 4%, and 3% of our revenues were attributed to the operations of these properties in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Geographic and Business Segment Information” for information related to our operations and information regarding geographic areas.

Environmental and Regulatory Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws may impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to released asbestos-containing materials. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require corrective or other expenditures. In connection with our current or prior ownership or operation of hotels, we may be potentially liable for various environmental costs or liabilities. Although we are currently not aware of any material environmental claims pending or threatened against us, we can offer no assurance that a material environmental claim will not be asserted against us in the future.

Operational Agreements

All of our hotels are managed by third parties pursuant to management or operating agreements, with some of thosesuch hotels also being subject to separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to operation under the designated brand. Under these agreements, the managers generally have sole responsibility and exclusive authority for all activities necessary for the day-to-day operation of the hotels, including establishing room rates, securing and processing reservations, procuring inventories, supplies and services, providing periodic inspection and consultation visits to the hotels by the managers’ technical and operational experts and promoting and publicizing the hotels. The managers provide all managerial and other employees for the hotels, review the operation and maintenance of the hotels, prepare reports, budgets and projections, and provide other administrative and accounting support services to the hotels. These support services include planning and policy services, divisional financial services, product planning and development, employee staffing and training, corporate executive management and certain in-house legal services. For the majority of our properties, weWe have certain approval rights over budgets, capital expenditures, significant leases and contractual commitments, and various other matters.

These management agreements can affect the value of the property associated with it based on the pricing and flexibility of the agreement. In addition to customary performance termination rights, certain of our agreements with Starwood and Marriott have limited special termination rights, as detailed below, that can lend to the flexibility of the agreement. We often will seek to negotiate the terms of an agreement to provide greater value to the associated asset. See “Termination Rights” and “Special Termination Rights” described below.

General Terms and Provisions – Agreements governing the management and operation of our hotels typically include the terms described below:

Term and fees for operational services. The initial term of our management and operating agreements generally is 15 to 25 years, with one or more renewal terms at the option of the manager. The majority of our management agreements condition the manager’s right to exercise options for specified renewal terms upon the satisfaction of specified economic performance criteria. The manager typically receives compensation in the form of a base management fee, which is calculated as a percentage (generally 2-3%) of annual gross revenues, and an incentive management fee, which typically is calculated as a percentage (generally 10-20%) of operating profit after the owner has received a priority return on its investment in the hotel. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, the base management fee is only 1% of annual gross revenues, but that amount is supplemented by license fees payable to Starwood under a separate license agreement (as described below).

License services. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, the operation of the hotels is subject togoverned by separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to the designated brand, including rights to use trademarks, service marks and logos, matters relating to compliance with certain brand standards and policies, and the provision of certain system programs and centralized services. Although the term of these license agreements with Starwood generally is coterminous with the corresponding operating agreements, the license agreements contemplate the potential for continued brand affiliation even in the event of a termination of the operating agreement. As noted above, the Starwood licensors receive compensation in the form of license fees (generally of 5% of gross revenues attributable to room sales and 2% of gross revenues attributable to food and beverage sales), which amounts supplement the lower base management fee of only 1% of gross revenues received by Starwood under the operating agreements.

Chain or system programs and services. Managers are required to provide chain or system programs and services generally that are furnished on a centralized basis. Such services include the development and operation of certain computer systems and reservation services, regional or other centralized management and administrative services, marketing and sales programs and services, training and other personnel services, and other centralized or regional services as may be determined to be more efficiently performed on a centralized, regional or group basis rather than on an individual hotel basis. Costs and expenses incurred in providing these chain or system programs and services generally are allocated on a cost reimbursement basis among all hotels managed by the manager or its affiliates or that otherwise benefit from these services.

Working capital and fixed asset supplies. We are required to maintain working capital for each hotel and to fund the cost of certain fixed asset supplies (for example, linen, china, glassware, silver and uniforms). We also are responsible for providing funds to meet the cash needs for hotel operations if at any time the funds available therefromfrom working capital are insufficient to meet the financial requirements of the hotels. For certain hotels, the working capital accounts which would otherwise be maintained by the managers for each of such hotels are maintained on a pooled basis, with managers being authorized to make withdrawals from such pooled account as otherwise contemplated with respect to working capital in accordance with the provisions of the management or operating agreements.

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacements. We are required to provide the managers with all furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) necessary for the operation of the hotels (including funding any required FF&E replacements). On an annual basis, the managers prepare budgets for FF&E to be acquired and certain routine repairs and maintenance to be performed in the next year and an estimate of the necessary funds, which budgets are subject to our review and approval. For purposes of funding such expenditures, a specified percentage (typically 5%) of the gross revenues of each hotel is deposited by the manager into an escrow or reserve account in our name, to which the manager has access. In the case of


our Starwood-managed hotels, our operating agreements contemplate that this reserve account also may be used to fund the cost of certain major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building (as described below). For certain of our Marriott-managed hotels, we have entered into an agreement with Marriott to allow for such expenditures to be funded from one pooled reserve account, rather than funds being deposited into separate reserve accounts at each hotel, with the minimum required balance maintained on an ongoing basis in that pooled reserve account being significantly below the amount that would have otherwise been maintained otherwise in such separate hotel reserve accounts. For certain of our Starwood-managed hotels, the periodic reserve fund contributions, which otherwise would be deposited into reserve accounts maintained by managers for each hotel, are distributed to us and, as to this pool of hotels, we are responsible for providing funding of expenditures which otherwise would be funded from reserve accounts for each of the subject hotels.

Building alterations, improvements and renewals. The managers are required to prepare an annual estimate of the expenditures necessary for major repairs, alterations, improvements, renewals and replacements to the structural, mechanical, electrical, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, plumbing and elevators of each hotel, along with alterations and improvements to the hotel as are required, in the manager’s reasonable judgment, to keep the hotel in a competitive, efficient and economical operating condition that is consistent with brand standards. We generally have approval rights as to such budgets and expenditures, which we

review and approve based on our manager’s recommendations and on our judgment. Expenditures for these major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building typically are funded directly by owners, although (as noted above) our agreements with Starwood contemplate that certain such expenditures may be funded from the reserve account.

Treatment of additional owner funding. As additional owner funding becomes necessary either for either expenditures generally funded from the FF&E reserve accounts,replacement funds, or for any major repairs or improvements to the hotel building which may be required to be funded directly by owners, most of our agreements provide for an economic benefit to us through an impact on the calculation of incentive management fees payable to our managers. One approach frequently utilized at our Marriott-managed hotels is to provide such owner funding through loans which are repaid, with interest, from operational revenues, with the repayment amounts reducing operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. Another approach that typically is used at our Starwood-managed hotels, as well as with certain capital expenditures projects at our Marriott-managed hotels, is to treat such owner funding as an increase to our investment in the hotel, resulting in an increase to owner’s priority return with a corresponding reduction to the amount of operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. For our Starwood-managed hotels that are subject to the pooled arrangement described above, the amount of any additional reserve account funding is allocated to each of such hotels on a pro rata basis, determined with reference to the net operating income of each hotel and the total net operating income of all such pooled hotels for the most recent operating year.

Territorial protections. Certain management and operating agreements impose restrictions for a specified period which limit the manager and its affiliates from owning, operating or licensing a hotel of the same brand within a specified area. The area restrictions vary with each hotel, from city blocks in urban areas to up to a multi-mile radius from the hotel in other areas.

Sale of the hotel. Subject to specific agreements as to certain hotels (see below under ‘Special Termination Rights’), we generally are limited in our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the hotels by the requirement that the transferee assume the related management agreements and meet specified other conditions, including the condition that the transferee not be a competitor of the manager.

Performance Termination Rights.In addition to any right to terminate that may arise as a result of a default by the manager, most of our management and operating agreements include reserved rights by us to terminate management or operating agreements on the basis of the manager’s failure to meet certain performance-based metrics, typically including a specified threshold return on owner’s investment in the hotel, along with a failure of the hotel to achieve a specified RevPAR performance threshold established with reference to other competitive hotels in the market. Typically, such performance-based termination rights arise in the event the operator fails to achieve specified performance thresholds over a consecutive two-year period, and are subject to the manager’s ability to ‘cure’ and avoid termination by payment to us of specified deficiency amounts (or, in some instances, waiver of the right to receive specified future management fees). We have agreed in the past, and may agree in the future, to waive certain of these termination rights in exchange for consideration from a manager or its affiliates, which consideration may include cash compensation or amendments to management agreements.

Special Termination Rights. In addition to any performance-based or other termination rights set forth in our management and operating agreements, we have specific negotiated with Marriott and Starwood specific termination rights as to certain management and operating agreements. With respect to our Marriott portfolio, subject to certain timing and other limitations, these rights include termination rights applicable to 15 properties. With respect to our Starwood portfolio, subject to certain timing and other limitations, these rights include termination rights applicable to 10 properties. We also have similar termination rights applicable to 8 other properties. While the brand affiliation of a property may increase the value of a hotel, the ability to dispose of a property unencumbered by a management agreement, or even brand affiliation, also can increase the value for


prospective purchasers. These termination rights can take a number of different forms, including termination of agreements upon sale that leave the property unencumbered by any agreement; termination upon sale provided that the property continues to be operated under a license or franchise agreement with continued brand affiliation; as well as termination without sale or other condition, which may require the payment of a fee. These termination rights also may restrict the number of agreements that may be terminated over any annual or other period; impose limitations on the number of agreements terminated as measured by EBITDA; require that a certain number of properties continue to maintain the brand affiliation; or be restricted to a specific pool of assets.

Operating Structure

Employees

Host Inc. operates through an umbrella partnership structure in which substantially all of its assets are held by Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and holds approximately 99% of the OP units as of December 31, 2014. A REIT is a corporation that has elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and that meets certain ownership, organizational and operating requirements set forth under the Code. In general, through payments of dividends to stockholders, a REIT is permitted to reduce or eliminate federal income taxes at the corporate level. Each OP unit owned by holders other than Host Inc. is redeemable, at the option of the holder, for an amount of cash equal to the market value of one share of Host Inc. common stock multiplied by the current conversion factor of 1.021494. Host Inc. has the right to acquire any OP unit offered for redemption directly from the holder in exchange for 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock instead of Host L.P. redeeming such OP unit for cash. Additionally, for every share of common stock issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue .97895 OP units to Host Inc. in exchange for the consideration received from the issuance of the common stock. As of December 31, 2011,2014, non-controlling limited partners held 9.3 million OP units, which were convertible into 9.4 million Host Inc. common shares. Assuming that all OP units held by non-controlling limited partners were converted into common shares, there would have been 765.2 million common shares of Host Inc. outstanding at December 31, 2014.

Our operating structure is as follows:

Because Host Inc. has elected to be treated as a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income that Host Inc. and Host L.P. can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. As a result, we lease substantially all of our consolidated properties to certain of our subsidiaries designated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) for federal income tax purposes or to third party lessees. Our TRS are subject to income tax and are not limited as to the amount of non-qualifying income they can generate. Our TRS enter into agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the hotels. Our TRS also may own assets engaging in other activities that produce non-qualifying income, such as the development of timeshare or condominium units, subject to certain restrictions. The difference between the hotels’ net operating cash flow and the aggregate rents paid to Host L.P. is retained by our TRS as taxable income. Accordingly, the net effect of the TRS leases is that, while, as a REIT, Host Inc. generally does not pay federal and state income tax to the extent that it meets specific distribution requirements, among other REIT requirements, a portion of the net operating cash flow from our properties is subject to federal, state and, if applicable, foreign income tax.


Our Consolidated Hotel Portfolio

As of February 20, 2015, we owned a portfolio of 114 hotel properties, of which 97 are located in the United States and 17 are located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico and New Zealand. Our consolidated hotels located outside the United States collectively contain approximately 4,200 rooms. Approximately 5% of our revenues were attributed to the operations of these foreign properties in each of 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. Our portfolio primarily consists of luxury and upper upscale properties that are located in the central business districts of major cities, near airports and resort/conference destinations, which are operated under internationally recognized brand names such as Marriott, Hyatt, Starwood and Accor. There also has been a trend towards more specialized, smaller boutique hotels that are customized towards a particular customer profile. Generally, these properties will be operated by an independent third party and either will have no brand affiliation, or will be associated with a major brand, while maintaining the majority of its independent identity (which we refer to as “soft-branded” properties). We have expanded our investments to include independent and soft-branded properties where we believe that the manager and independent identity is the best fit for the hotel.

Revenues earned at our hotels consist of three broad categories: rooms, food and beverage, and other revenues. While approximately 65% of our revenue is generated from room sales, many of our properties feature a variety of amenities that help drive demand and profitability. Our hotels typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, swimming pools, exercise facilities and/or spas, gift shops and parking facilities, the combination of which enable them to serve business, leisure and group travelers.  

Thirty-nine of our consolidated hotels, representing approximately 62% of our revenues, have in excess of 500 rooms.  The average age of our properties is 32 years, although substantially all of the properties have benefited from significant renovations or major additions, as well as regularly scheduled renewal and replacement and other capital improvements.

By Brand. The following table details our consolidated hotel portfolio by brand as of February 20, 2015:

 

 

Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

Brand

 

of Hotels

 

 

Rooms

 

 

Revenues (1)

 

Marriott

 

 

54

 

 

 

30,017

 

 

 

48.5

%

Ritz-Carlton

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,684

 

 

 

7.6

 

Starwood:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Westin

 

 

13

 

 

 

6,907

 

 

 

11.4

 

Sheraton

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,044

 

 

 

9.6

 

W

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

 

3.2

 

St. Regis

 

 

1

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

0.6

 

The Luxury Collection

 

 

1

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

0.1

 

Hyatt

 

 

9

 

 

 

6,809

 

 

 

12.1

 

Hilton/Embassy Suites

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,053

 

 

 

1.6

 

Swissôtel

 

 

1

 

 

 

661

 

 

 

1.0

 

Fairmont

 

 

1

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

1.8

 

Accor:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ibis

 

 

4

 

 

 

711

 

 

 

0.3

 

Novotel

 

 

5

 

 

 

862

 

 

 

0.7

 

Other/Independent

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,124

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

59,083

 

 

 

100

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Percentage of revenues is based on 2014 revenues. No individual property contributed more than 7% of total revenues in 2014.  


By Location. The following table details the location and number of rooms at our consolidated hotels as of February 20, 2015:

Location

 

Rooms

 

 

Location

 

Rooms

 

Arizona

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois

 

 

 

 

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

 

 

243

 

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

 

 

254

 

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

 

 

266

 

 

Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

470

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

 

 

281

 

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O’Hare

 

 

256

 

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

 

 

732

 

 

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/River North

 

 

337

 

California

 

 

 

 

 

Embassy Suites Chicago-Downtown/Lakefront

 

 

455

 

Axiom Hotel

 

 

151

 

 

Swissôtel Chicago

 

 

661

 

Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa (1)

 

 

300

 

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

424

 

Costa Mesa Marriott

 

 

253

 

 

Indiana

 

 

 

 

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

 

 

884

 

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing

 

 

395

 

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport

 

 

789

 

 

The Westin Indianapolis

 

 

575

 

Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (1)

 

 

1,628

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

 

 

Manhattan Beach Marriott (1)

 

 

385

 

 

New Orleans Marriott

 

 

1,329

 

Marina del Rey Marriott (1)

 

 

370

 

 

Maryland

 

 

 

 

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (1)

 

 

1,360

 

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

 

 

284

 

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

 

532

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

 

 

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

 

 

254

 

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

 

 

1,144

 

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

 

 

350

 

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

470

 

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

 

 

285

 

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

 

 

1,220

 

San Francisco Marriott Marquis (1)

 

 

1,500

 

 

Sheraton Needham Hotel

 

 

247

 

San Ramon Marriott (1)

 

 

368

 

 

The Westin Waltham-Boston

 

 

351

 

Santa Clara Marriott (1)

 

 

759

 

 

Minnesota

 

 

 

 

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina (1)

 

 

1,053

 

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center (1)

 

 

583

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey (1)

 

 

304

 

 

Missouri

 

 

 

 

The Westin Los Angeles Airport (1)

 

 

740

 

 

Kansas City Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

384

 

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

 

 

512

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

 

 

The Westin South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa (2)

 

 

390

 

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

591

 

Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

Park Ridge Marriott (1)

 

 

289

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

 

 

628

 

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

 

 

370

 

Denver Marriott West (1)

 

 

305

 

 

New York

 

 

 

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

430

 

 

New York Marriott Downtown

 

 

497

 

Florida

 

 

 

 

 

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

1,957

 

Tampa Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

298

 

 

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

1,780

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa (1)(3)

 

 

650

 

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

774

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

 

 

222

 

 

W New York

 

 

696

 

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay (1)

 

 

600

 

 

W New York – Union Square (3)

 

 

270

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

2,003

 

 

Ohio

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

 

 

446

 

 

The Westin Cincinnati (1)

 

 

456

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

 

 

450

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples

 

 

295

 

 

Four Seasons Hotel Philadelphia

 

 

357

 

YVE Hotel Miami

 

 

242

 

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

419

 

Georgia

 

 

 

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown (1)

 

 

254

 

 

Sheraton Memphis Downtown

 

 

600

 

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

 

 

341

 

 

Texas

 

 

 

 

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

 

 

439

 

 

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush

 

 

 

 

JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead

 

 

371

 

 

Intercontinental (1) (3)

 

 

565

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

 

 

510

 

 

Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center (1)

 

 

394

 

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

 

 

365

 

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

515

 

Hawaii

 

 

 

 

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter (1)

 

 

1,001

 

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa

 

 

806

 

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk (1)

 

 

512

 

The Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

450

 

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

232

 

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

Brazil (continued)

 

 

 

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

518

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

245

 

Key Bridge Marriott (1)

 

 

582

 

 

      Novotel Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico

 

 

149

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

299

 

 

Canada

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner (1)

 

 

398

 

 

Calgary Marriott Downtown

 

 

384

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

368

 

 

Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre

 

 

374

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

 

 

336

 

 

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel (1)

 

 

461

 

Washington

 

 

 

 

 

Chile

 

 

 

 

Seattle Airport Marriott

 

 

459

 

 

San Cristobal Tower, Santiago

 

 

139

 

The Westin Seattle

 

 

891

 

 

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center

 

 

379

 

W Seattle

 

 

424

 

 

Mexico

 

 

 

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City (3)

 

 

312

 

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

897

 

 

New Zealand

 

 

 

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

 

 

836

 

 

Novotel Auckland Ellerslie

 

 

147

 

JW Marriott Washington D.C.

 

 

772

 

 

ibis Ellerslie

 

 

100

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

 

 

267

 

 

Novotel Wellington

 

 

139

 

Washington Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

459

 

 

ibis Wellington

 

 

200

 

Australia

 

 

 

 

 

Novotel Queenstown Lakeside

 

 

273

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1) (3)

 

 

376

 

 

Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square (1)

 

 

154

 

Brazil

 

 

 

 

 

ibis Christchurch (1)

 

 

155

 

      ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico

 

 

256

 

 

Total

 

 

59,083

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The land on which this hotel is built is leased from a third party under one or more lease agreements.

(2)

The land, building and improvements are leased from a third party under a long-term lease agreement.

(3)

This property is not wholly owned.

By Market: Since 2004, the percentage of revenues from our target markets in the U.S. and internationally has increased from approximately 65% to 80%. The following graph summarizes the composition of our consolidated hotels by market based on percentage of 2014 revenues (excluding properties owned by our European and Asia/Pacific joint ventures and sold hotels):  


By Class:  Historically, we have focused on the upper-upscale and luxury asset classes, as we believe they have broad appeal for both the leisure and business customer.  Going forward, we also may broaden our property classes into others, such as urban select-service properties. The following graph summarizes the composition of the 114 hotels in our consolidated portfolio based on the percentage of 2014 revenues represented by our luxury, upper upscale and other categories (excluding properties owned by our European and Asia/Pacific joint ventures and sold hotels):    

By Type:  Our portfolio focus historically has been on gateway markets in urban and resort/conference destinations.  The following graph summarizes the composition of the 114 hotels in our consolidated portfolio based on the percentage of 2014 revenues represented by our property type categories (excluding properties owned by our European and Asia/Pacific joint ventures and sold hotels):

 

Other Real Estate Interests

In addition to our consolidated hotel portfolio, we also own non-controlling interests in several entities that, as of February 20, 2015, owned, or owned an interest in, 25 hotel properties, as detailed below. The operations of the properties owned by these entities


are not consolidated and are included in equity in earnings in our consolidated results of operations. See Part II Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 3. Investments in Affiliates.”

European Joint Venture. We own a general and limited partnership interest in a joint venture in Europe (“Euro JV”) with APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). The Euro JV consists of two funds, which we refer to as Euro JV Fund I and Euro JV Fund II. We hold a 32.0% limited partner interest and a 0.1% general partner interest in Euro JV Fund I and a 33.3% limited partner interest and a 0.1% general partner interest in Euro JV Fund II. A subsidiary of Host L.P. acts as the asset manager for the hotels owned by the Euro JV, as well as for one hotel in Paris, France, in exchange for a fee. As of February 20, 2015, the Euro JV owns the following hotels:

Hotel

City

Country

Rooms/Units

Fund I:

Hotel Arts Barcelona

Barcelona

Spain

483

The Westin Palace, Madrid

Madrid

Spain

467

Sheraton Roma Hotel & Conference Center

Rome

Italy

640

The Westin Palace, Milan

Milan

Italy

227

The Westin Europa & Regina

Venice

Italy

185

Renaissance Brussels Hotel

Brussels

Belgium

262

Brussels Marriott Hotel

Brussels

Belgium

221

Marriott Executive Apartments

Brussels

Belgium

56

Crowne Plaza Hotel Amsterdam City Centre

Amsterdam

The Netherlands

270

Sheraton Warsaw Hotel & Towers

Warsaw

Poland

350

Fund I total rooms

3,161

Fund II:

Paris Marriott Rive Gauche Hotel & Conference Center

Paris

France

757

Pullman Bercy Paris

Paris

France

396

Renaissance Paris La Defense Hotel

Paris

France

327

Renaissance Paris Vendome Hotel

Paris

France

97

Renaissance Amsterdam Hotel

Amsterdam

The Netherlands

402

Le Méridien Piccadilly

London

United Kingdom

280

Le Méridien Grand Hotel Nuremberg

Nuremberg

Germany

192

Sheraton Stockholm Hotel

Stockholm

Sweden

465

Sheraton Berlin Grand Hotel Esplanade

Berlin

Germany

394

Fund II total rooms

3,310

Total European joint venture rooms

6,471

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture. We own a 25% interest in a joint venture in Asia (the “Asia/Pacific JV”) with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. Our Asia/Pacific JV owns the 278-room Four Points by Sheraton Perth in Perth, Australia and a 36% non-controlling interest in a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited that owns three hotels, with an additional four hotels under development, totaling 1,750 rooms. The seven hotels in India are or will be operated under the Pullman, Novotel and ibis brands.

Other U.S. Real Estate Investments. Our other domestic real estate investments include the following:

We have a non-controlling 50% interest in a joint venture with White Lodging Services that owns the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee.

We have a non-controlling 67% interest in a joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group, a subsidiary of Interval Leisure Group, to develop, sell and operate the Hyatt Ka’anapali Beach, A Hyatt Residence Club, a 131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. The project opened in December 2014.

We have a non-controlling 11% interest in a joint venture that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown following our January 10, 2014 sale of an 89% interest in the property.


Competition

The lodging industry is highly competitive. Competition often is specific to individual markets and is based on a number of factors, including location, brand, guest facilities and amenities, level of service, room rates and the quality of accommodations. The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. The classification of a property is based on lodging industry standards, which take into consideration many factors such as guest facilities and amenities, level of service and quality of accommodations. Most of our hotels operate in urban and resort markets either as luxury properties under such brand names as Fairmont®, Grand Hyatt®, JW Marriott®, Ritz-Carlton®, St. Regis®, The Luxury Collection® and W®, or as upper upscale properties under such brand names as Embassy Suites®, Hilton®, Hyatt®, Le Méridien®, Marriott Executive Apartments®, Marriott Marquis®, Marriott Suites®, Pullman®, Renaissance®, Sheraton®, Swissôtel® and Westin®. We also may selectively invest in upscale and midscale properties such as Courtyard by Marriott®, Crowne Plaza®, Four Points by Sheraton®, Hyatt Place®, ibis®, Novotel® or Residence Inn by Marriott®, particularly in international markets. 1(1)While our hotels primarily compete with other hotels in the luxury and upper upscale segments, they also may compete with hotels in other lower-tier segments. In addition, many management contracts for our hotels do not prohibit our managers from converting, franchising or developing other hotel properties in our markets.  As a result, our hotels compete with other hotels that our managers may own, invest in, manage or franchise.  

We believe our properties enjoy competitive advantages associated with the hotel brands under which they operate. The international marketing programs and reservation systems of these brands, combined with the strong management systems and expertise they provide, should enable our properties to perform favorably in terms of both occupancy and room rates. In addition, repeat guest business is enhanced by guest reward or guest recognition programs offered by most of these brands.

We also compete with other REITs and other public and private investors for the acquisition of new properties and investment opportunities, both in domestic and international markets, as we attempt to position our portfolio to take best advantage of changes in markets and travel patterns of our customers.

Seasonality

Our hotel sales traditionally have experienced moderate seasonality, which varies based on the individual property and the region. Hotel sales for our consolidated portfolio averaged approximately 24%, 27%, 24% and 25% for the first, second, third and fourth calendar quarters, respectively, in 2014.

Environmental and Regulatory Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws may impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of hazardous or toxic materials, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to released hazardous or toxic materials. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require corrective or other expenditures. In connection with our current or prior ownership or operation of hotels, we potentially may be liable for various environmental costs or liabilities. Although currently we are not aware of any material environmental claims pending or threatened against us, we can offer no assurance that a material environmental claim will not be asserted against us in the future.

Employees

As of February 20, 2015 we had 219251 employees, consisting of 196 at our corporate headquarterswhich 228 work in Bethesda, Maryland and a total ofthe United States. We had 23 employees located in our offices in Arizona, London, England, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Amsterdam The Netherlands and the Republic of Singapore. While employees at our consolidated hotels generally are employed by the operators that manage our hotels, we have seven hotels in New Zealand and one in Australia where we collectively have 538 employees.

None of our directHost’s employees as of December 31, 2011 are covered by collective bargaining agreements. However,The number of employees referenced above does not include the hotel employees of our 11 hotels in Brazil, New Zealand and Australia, which, while technically are Host employees, are under the direct supervision and control of our third-party hotel managers. Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not manage employees at our consolidated hotels, we still are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force, particularly those hotels with unionized labor. We believe relations with the employees of these third party managers are positive. For a discussion of these relationships, see Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.”

1(1)(1)

(1)This annual report contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners, which are companies other than us. None of the owners of these trademarks, their affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, agents or employees, has or will have any responsibility or liability for any information contained in this annual report.  


Employees at certain of our third-party managed hotels are covered by collective bargaining agreements that are subject to review and renewal on a regular basis. For a discussion of these relationships, see Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.”

Where to Find Additional Information

The address of our principal executive office is 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817. Our phone number is 240-744-1000. We maintain an internet website at: www.hosthotels.com. Through our website, we make available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with, or furnished to, the SEC, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The public also may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

Our website also is a key source of important information about us. We routinely post to the Investor Relations section of our website important information about our business, our operating results and our financial condition and prospects, including, for example, information about material acquisitions and dispositions, our earnings releases and certain supplemental financial information related or complimentary thereto. The website also has a Governance page in the Investor Relations section that includes, among other things, copies of our By-laws, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy for our directors, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy for employees, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for each standing committee of Host Inc.’s Board of Directors, which currently include the Audit Committee, the Compensation Policy Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of these charters and policies, Host Inc.’s By-laws and Host L.P.’s partnership agreement also are available in print to stockholders and unitholders upon request to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland 20817, Attn: Secretary. Please note that the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, any document, unless expressly incorporated by reference therein.

Item  1A.

Risk Factors

The statements in this section describe the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. In addition, these statements constitute our cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Financial Risks and Risks of Operation

Our revenues and the value of our properties are subject to conditions affecting the lodging industry.

The performance of the lodging industry is subject to changes in the travel patterns of business and leisure travelers, both of which aretraditionally has been affected by the strength of the general economy as well as other factors.and, specifically, growth in gross domestic product (“GDP”). Changes in travel patterns of both business and leisure travelers, particularly during periods of economic contraction or low levels of economic growth, may create difficulties for the industry over the long-term and adversely affect our results. Duringresults of operations. The majority of our hotels are classified as luxury or upper upscale and generally target business and high-end leisure travelers. In periods of economic difficulties, business and leisure travelers may seek to reduce travel costs by limiting travel or seeking to reduce costs on their trips. Consequently, our luxury or upper upscale hotels may be more susceptible to a decrease in revenue during an economic downturn, as compared to hotels in other categories that have lower room rates.  For instance, reductions in overall travel during the recession in 2008 and 2009 overall travel was reduced, which had a significant effect onsignificantly affected our results of operations. While operating results improved during 2010Other circumstances affecting the lodging industry which may affect our performance and 2011,the forecasts we make include:

changes in the international, national, regional and local economic climate;

the effect of terrorist attacks and terror alerts in the United States and internationally, as well as other geopolitical disturbances;

supply growth in markets where we own hotels, which may adversely affect demand at our properties;

the attractiveness of our hotels to consumers relative to competing hotels;

the performance of the managers of our hotels;

outbreaks of disease and the impact on travel of natural disasters and weather;

physical damage to our hotels as a result of earthquakes, hurricanes, or other natural disasters, or the income lost as a result of the damage;


changes in room rates and increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors;

unionization of the labor force at our hotels; and

political uncertainty and changes in government policies, in particular with respect to U.S. economic policy, U.S. federal budget deficit concerns, or a reduction in travel by U.S. government employees and contractors as a result of spending cuts.

We cannot assure you that adverse changes in the strength and direction of the recovery and continued high unemployment have slowed the pace of the overall economic recovery. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any increases in hotel revenuesgeneral economy or earnings at our properties will continue for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, slower than anticipated growth in the economy. Our results of operations and any forecast we make, may be affected by, and can change based on, a variety ofother circumstances that affect the lodging industry including:

changes inwill not have an adverse effect on the international, national, regional and local economic climate;

changes in business and leisure travel patterns;

the effect of terrorist attacks and terror alerts in the United States and internationally, as well as other geopolitical disturbances;

supply growth in markets where we own hotels, which may adversely affect demandhotel revenue or earnings at our properties;

the attractiveness of our hotels to consumers relative to competing hotels;

the performance of the managers of our hotels;

outbreaks of disease and the impact on travel of natural disasters and weather;

changes in room rates and increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors; and

unionization of the labor force at our hotels.

properties. A reduction in our revenue or earnings as a result of the above risks may reduce our working capital and revenue, impact our long-term business strategy and impact the value of our assets and our ability to meet certain covenants in our existing debt agreements.

Disruptions in the financial markets In addition, we may adversely affect our business and results of operations, our ability to obtain financing on reasonable and acceptable terms, and our ability to hedge our foreign currency exchange risk.

The United States and global equity and credit markets have at times experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions since 2008, all of which caused market prices of the stocks of many companies to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective and outstanding debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances impacted liquidity in the financial markets, which made terms for financings less attractive, and, in some cases, resulted in the lack of availability of certain types of financing. Conditions in the credit markets improved in 2010 but have become more volatile again starting in the third quarter of 2011. Continued uncertainty in the equity and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional short-term and long-term financing on reasonable terms or at all, which would negatively impact our liquidity and financial condition. A prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may negatively impact our ability to enter into derivative contracts in order to hedge risks associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Disruptions in the financial markets also may adversely affect our credit rating. While we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity with which to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future, if our operating results weaken significantly and our cash flow or capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Concerns regarding the downgrade of the U.S. credit rating and the sovereign debt crisis in Europe could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity.

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s lowered its long term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America from AAA to AA+. While U.S. lawmakers reached agreement to raise the federal debt ceiling on August 2, 2011, the downgrade reflected Standard & Poor’s view that the fiscal consolidation plan within that agreement fell short of what would be necessary to stabilize the U.S. government’s medium term debt dynamics. This downgrade could have material adverse impacts on financial markets and economic conditions in the United States and throughout the world and, in turn, the market’s anticipation of these impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity. In particular, it could disrupt payment systems, money markets, long-term or short-term fixed income markets, foreign exchange markets, commodities markets and equity markets and adversely affect the cost and availability of funding and certain impacts, such as increased spreads in money market and other short term rates, some of which have been experienced already. Because of the unprecedented nature of negative credit rating actions with respect to U.S. government obligations, the ultimate impacts on global markets and our business, financial condition and liquidity are unpredictable and may not be immediately apparent.

On January 13, 2012, Standard & Poor’s lowered its long term sovereign credit rating on France, Italy and seven other European countries, which has negatively impacted global markets and economic conditions. The continued uncertainty over the outcome of these governments and other European Union (“EU”) member states financial support programs and the possibility that other EU member states may experience similar financial troubles could further disrupt global markets. In particular, it has and could in the future disrupt equity markets and result in volatile bond yields on the sovereign debt of EU members. These factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity. We have properties in some EU member states, held through our European joint venture, that have experienced difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, including Italy and Spain, and the results of operations at those hotels also could be adversely affected.

Economic conditions may adversely affect the value of our hotels which may result in impairment charges on our properties.

We analyze our assets for impairment in several situations, including when a property has current or projected losses from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other material trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred, such that an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. For impaired assets, we record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the property’s carrying value over its fair value. Our operating results for 2009 and 2011 included $131 million and $8 million, respectively, of impairment charges related to our consolidated hotels and the investment in our European joint venture. We may incur additional impairment charges in the future, which charges will affect negatively affect our results of operations. We can provide no assurance that any impairment loss recognized would not be material to our results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies.”

We depend on external sources of capital for future growth and we may be unablegrowth; therefore, any disruption to our ability to access capital when necessary.at times, and on terms reasonably acceptable to us, may affect adversely our business and results of operations.

Unlike regular C corporations, Host Inc. must finance its growth and fund debt repayments largely with external sources of capital because it is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gain) in order to qualify as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which it does not receive cash. Funds used by Host Inc. to make required distributions are provided throughby distributions from Host L.P. Our ability to access external capital could be hampered by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including credit market conditions as discussed above, unfavorable market perception of our growth potential, decreases in our current and estimated future earnings, or decreases in the market price of the common stock of Host Inc. Our ability to access additionalincluding:

price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the U.S. and global equity and credit markets such as occurred during 2008 and 2009;

changes in market perception of our growth potential, including rating agency downgrades by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Fitch Ratings;

decreases in our current and estimated future earnings;

decreases or fluctuations in the market price of the common stock of Host Inc.;

increases in interest rates; and

the terms of our existing indebtedness which, under certain circumstances, restrict our incurrence of debt.

capital also may be limited by the terms of our existing indebtedness which, under certain circumstances, restrict our incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends and Host L.P. distributions. The occurrence of any of these factors, individually or in combination, could prevent us from being able to obtain the external capital we require on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance our future growth.growth and our results of operations and financial condition.  Potential consequences of disruptions in U.S. and global equity and credit markets and, as a result, an inability for us to access external capital at times, and on terms, reasonably acceptable to us could include:

a need to seek alternative sources of capital with less attractive terms, such as more restrictive covenants and shorter maturity;

adverse effects on our financial condition and liquidity, and our ability to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures;

higher costs of capital;

an inability to enter into derivative contracts in order to hedge risks associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; or

an inability to execute on our acquisition strategy.

We have substantial debt and may incur additional debt.

As of December 31, 2011,2014, we and our subsidiaries had total indebtedness of approximately $5.75$4.0 billion. Our substantial indebtedness requires us to dedicate a significant portion of our annual cash flow from operations to debt service payments, which reduces the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, expansion efforts, dividends and distributions and other general corporate needs. Additionally, our substantial indebtedness could:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;

limit our ability in the future to undertake refinancings of our debt or to obtain financing for expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate needs on terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all; or


affect adversely our ability to compete effectively or operate successfully under adverse economic conditions.

If our cash flow and working capital are not sufficient to fund our expenditures or service our indebtedness, we will havebe required to raise additional funds through:

sales of our

sales of Host L.P.’s OP units or Host Inc.’s common stock;

the incurrence of additional permitted indebtedness by Host L.P.; or

the sale of our assets.

We cannot make any assurances that any of these sources of funds will be available to us or, if available, will be on terms that we would find acceptable or in amounts sufficient to meet our obligations or fulfill our business plan. Under certain circumstances, we would be required to use the cash from some of the events described above to repay other indebtedness.

The terms of our debtindebtedness and preferred units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.

The documents governingWe are, and may in the terms of our existing senior notesfuture become, party to agreements and our credit facility contain covenantsinstruments that place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries.  TheseFor instance, the covenants in the documents governing the terms of our senior notes and our credit facility restrict, among other things, our ability to:

conduct acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, unless the successor entity in such transaction assumes our indebtedness;

incur additional debt in excess of certain thresholds and without satisfying certain financial metrics;

create

incur liens securing indebtedness, unless an effective provision is made to secure our other indebtedness by such liens;

sell assets without using the proceeds from such sales for certain permitted uses or to make an offer to repay or repurchase outstanding indebtedness;

make distributions without satisfying certain financial metrics;

pay dividends on classes and series of Host Inc. capital stock and pay distributions on Host L.P.’s classes of units without satisfying certain financial metrics concerning leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage; and

conduct transactions with affiliates other than on an arm’s length basis and, in certain instances, without obtaining opinions as to the fairness of such transactions.

In addition, certain covenants in our credit facility also require us and our subsidiaries to meet financial performance tests.metrics.  The restrictive covenants in the applicable indenture(s), the credit facility and the documents governing our other debt (including our mortgage debt) will reduce our flexibility in conducting our operations and will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interest.  Failure to comply with these restrictive covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration

of all or a substantial portion of our debt. In addition, certain of our mortgage debt requires that, to the extent cash flow from the hotels which secure such debt drops below stated levels, we escrow cash flow after the payment of debt service until operations improve above the stated levels.  In some cases, the lender may apply the escrowed amount to the outstanding balance of the mortgage debt. If such provisions are triggered, the amounts required to be escrowed may affect negatively our liquidity from these mortgaged properties by limiting our access to cash flow after debt service. For a detailed description of the covenants and restrictions imposed by the documents governing our indebtedness, see Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Operations—Financial Condition.”

Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the terms of our indebtedness or preferred units.

We are, and may in the future become, party to agreements and instruments that restrict or prevent the payment of dividends on classes and series of Host Inc. capital stock and Host L.P.’s payment of distributions on its classes of units. Under the terms of Host L.P.’s credit facility and senior notes indenture, distributions to Host L.P. unitholders, including Host Inc., upon which Host Inc. depends in order to obtain the cash necessary to pay dividends, are permitted only to the extent that Host L.P. can satisfy certain financial covenant tests (concerning leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage) and meet other requirements. We are permitted under our credit facility and senior notes indenture to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s REIT status.

Under the terms of Host L.P.’s outstanding preferred OP units, we are not permitted to make distributions on our common OP units unless all cumulative distributions have been paid (or funds for payment have been set aside for payment) on our preferred OP units. In the event that we fail to pay the accrued distributions on our preferred OP units for any reason, including any restriction on making such distributions under the terms of our debt instruments (as discussed above), distributions will continue to accrue on such preferred OP units and we will be prohibited from making any distributions on our common OP units until all such accrued but unpaid distributions on our preferred OP units have been paid (or funds for such payment have been set aside).

An increase in interest rates would increase the interest costs on our credit facility and on our floating rate debt and could impact adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt or sell assets.

Interest payments for borrowings on our credit facility, the mortgages on ninecertain properties and the fixed-to- floatingfixed-to-floating interest rate swaps linked to two other properties are based on floating rates. As a result, an increase in interest rates will reduce our cash flow available for other corporate purposes, including investments in our portfolio.  Further, risingRising interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures and increase interest costs on any debt that is refinanced. We may from time to time enter into agreements such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate hedging contracts. Currently, allthe majority of theour mortgages with floating rates which are secured by nine of our hotel properties, are fully or partially hedged through the use of floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps or interest rate caps and floors. While these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that the agreements will be unenforceable. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amount third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to dispose of assets as part of our business strategy.


Rating agency downgrades may increase our cost of capital.

Our senior notes are rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings. These independent rating agencies may elect to downgrade their ratings on our senior notes at any time. Such downgrades may affect negatively our access to the capital markets and increase our cost of capital.

Our expenses may not decrease if our revenue decreases.

Many of the expenses associated with owning and operating hotels, such as debt-service payments, property taxes, insurance, utilities, and employee wages and benefits, are relatively inflexible andinflexible. They do not necessarily decrease in tandem with a reduction in revenue at the hotels.hotels and may be subject to increases that are not tied to the performance of our hotels or the increase in the rate of inflation generally.  Also, as of December 31, 2014, 35 of our hotels are subject to third-party ground leases, which generally require periodic increases in ground rent payments. Our expenses also willability to pay these rents could be affected by inflationaryadversely if our hotel revenues do not increase at the same or a greater rate than the increases andin rental payments under the ground leases.

Additionally, certain costs, such as wages, benefits and insurance, may exceed the rate of inflation in any given period. In the event of a significant decrease in demand, weour hotel managers may not be able to reduce the size of hotel work forces in order to decrease wages and benefits. Our managers also may be unable to offset any suchfixed or increased expenses with higher room rates. Any of our efforts to reduce operating costs or failure to make scheduled capital expenditures also could adversely affect the future growth of our business and the value of our hotel properties.

Our acquisition of additional properties may have a significant effect on our business, liquidity, financial position and/or results of operations.

As part of our business strategy, we seek to acquire primarily luxury and upper upscale hotel properties.  We may acquire properties through various structures, including transactions involving portfolios, single assets, joint ventures and acquisitions of all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs or similar real estate entities.  We anticipate that our acquisitions will be financed through a combination of methods and a variety of sources of external capital, including proceeds from Host Inc. equity offerings, issuance of limited partnership interests of Host L.P., advances under our credit facility, the incurrence or assumption of indebtedness and proceeds from the sales of assets. Continued disruptions in credit marketsOur inability to access external sources of capital may limit our ability to finance acquisitionsacquisitions.  For a discussion of factors that may limit our access to sources of capital, see “—We depend on external sources of capital for future growth; therefore, any disruption to our ability to access capital at times, and on terms reasonably acceptable to us, may affect adversely our business and results of operations.”  In addition, certain of these factors, such as disruption in the global capital markets, may limit the ability of purchasers to finance their acquisition of our hotels and adversely affect our disposition strategy andtherefore our ability to use disposition proceeds to finance our acquisitions.

We may, from time to time, beroutinely are actively engaged in the process of identifying, analyzing and negotiating possible acquisition transactions.  We cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in consummating future acquisitions on favorable terms or that we will realize the benefits that we anticipate from such acquisitions.  Our inability to consummate one or more acquisitions on such terms, or our failure to realize the intended benefits from one or more acquisitions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial position and/or results of operations, including as a resultoperations.  These adverse effects may occur because the performance of our forfeiture of deposits in connection with our failure to consummate an acquisition or our incurrence ofthe property does not justify the additional indebtedness and related interest expense that we incurred as a result of the acquisition.  In addition, assets and entities that we have acquired, or may in the future acquire, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers.  In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements may not survive long enough for us to become aware of such liabilities and seek recourse against our sellers and indemnification covering representations and warranties often is limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses.  As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties.  The total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with acquired hotels and entities may exceed our expectations, plus we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may affect adversely our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition.  Finally, indemnification agreements between us and the sellers typically provide that the sellers will retain certain specified liabilities relating to the assets and entities acquired by us.  While the sellers generally are contractually obligated to pay all losses and other expenses relating to such retained liabilities without regard to survival limitations, materiality thresholds, deductibles or caps on losses, there can be no guarantee that such arrangements will not require us to incur losses or other expenses in addition to those incurred by the sellers.

We may not achieve the value we anticipate from new hotel developments or value enhancement projects at our existing hotels.

We currently are, and in the future may be, involved in the development of hotel properties, timeshare units or other alternate uses of portions of our existing properties, including the development of retail, office or apartments, including through joint ventures. There are risks inherent in any new development, including:

We may not obtain the zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations necessary to complete the development. A delay in receiving these approvals could affect adversely the returns we expect to receive.  

Any new construction involves the possibility of construction delays and cost overruns that may increase project costs.

Defects in design or construction may result in delays and additional costs to remedy the defect or require a portion of a property to be closed during the period required to rectify the defect.


We may not be able to meet the loan covenants in any financing obtained to fund the new development, creating default risks.  

The development of timeshare units could become less attractive due to decreases in demand for residential, fractional or interval ownership, increases in mortgage rates and/or decreases in mortgage availability, market absorption or oversupply, with the result that we may not be able to sell the timeshares for a profit or at the prices or selling pace we anticipate.  

In addition, to the extent that developments are conducted through joint ventures, this creates additional risks, including the possibility that our partners may not meet their financial obligations or could have or develop business interests, policies or objectives that are inconsistent with ours. See “—We may acquire hotel properties through joint ventures with third parties that could result in conflicts.”

Any of the above factors could affect adversely our and our assumptionpartners’ ability to complete the developments on schedule and along the scope that currently is contemplated, or to achieve the intended value of unforeseen contingent liabilities in connection with completed acquisitions.these projects. For these reasons, there can be no assurances as to the value to be realized by the company from these transactions or any future similar transactions.

We do not control our hotel operations and we are dependent on the managers of our hotels.

WeTo maintain our status as a REIT, we are not permitted to operate any of our hotels.  As a result, we have entered into management agreements with third-party managers to operate our hotel properties. Our cash flow fromFor this reason, we are unable to directly implement strategic business decisions with respect to the daily operation and marketing of our hotels, may be adversely affected ifsuch as decisions with respect to the setting of room rates, food and beverage pricing and certain similar matters.  Although we consult with our managers failhotel operators with respect to provide quality services and amenities or if they or their affiliates failstrategic business plans, the hotel operators are under no obligation to maintain a quality brand name.implement any of our recommendations with respect to these matters. While we monitor the hotel managers’ performance, we have limited recourse under our management agreements if we believe that the hotel managers are not performing adequately. In addition,The cash flow from our hotels may be affected adversely if our managers fail to provide quality services and amenities or if they or their affiliates fail to maintain a quality brand name.  Because our management agreements are long-term agreements, we also may not be able to terminate these agreements if we believe the manager is not performing adequately.

From time to time, we have had, and continue to have, differences with the managers of our hotels over their performance and compliance with the terms of our management agreements. We generally resolve issues with our managers through discussions and negotiations. However, if we are unable to reach satisfactory results through discussions and negotiations, we may choose to litigate the dispute or submit the matter to third-party dispute resolution. Failure by our hotel managers to fully perform the duties agreed to in our management agreements or the failure of our managers to adequately manage the risks associated with hotel operations could affect adversely affect our results of operations. Our

In addition, our hotel managers or their affiliates manage, and in some cases own, have invested in, or provided credit support or operating guarantees to hotels that compete with our hotels, all of which may result in conflicts of interest. As a result, our hotel managers have in the past made, and may in the future make, decisions regarding competing lodging facilities that are not or would not be in our best interest.

Furthermore, our management agreements generally have provisions that can restrict our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer our hotels, unless the transferee is not a competitor of the manager and the transferee assumes the related management agreements and meets specified other conditions. Our ability to finance or sell our properties, depending upon the structure of such transactions, may require the manager’s consent. Similarly, decisions with respect to a repositioning of a hotel, such as the outsourcing of food and beverage outlets, may require the manager’s consent.

We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.

Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not directly employ or manage employees at our consolidated hotels (other than employing, but not managing or supervising, the associates at our properties in Brazil, New Zealand and Australian properties)Australia), we still are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force, particularly at those hotels with unionized labor. From time to time, hotel operations may be disrupted as a result of strikes, lockouts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity. We also may incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of contract disputes involving our third-party managers and their labor force or other events. The resolution of labor disputes or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, a significant component of our hotel operating costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. WeAs we are not the employer nor bound by any collective bargaining agreement, we do not negotiate with any labor organization, and it is the responsibility of each property’s manager to enter into such labor contracts. Our ability, if any, to have any material impact on the


outcome of these negotiations is restricted by and dependent on the individual management agreement covering a specific property and we may have little ability to affectcontrol the outcome of these negotiations.

Our hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and potentially significant capital expenditures in order to remain competitive in the marketplace, maintain brand standards or to comply with applicable laws or regulations. The timing and costs of such renovations or improvements may result in reduced operating performance during construction and may not improve the return on these investments.

We are required by our loan agreements or agreements with our hotel managers to make agreed upon capital expenditures. In addition, we will need to make further capital expenditures in order to remain competitive with other hotels, to maintain the economic value of our hotels and to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The timing of these improvements can affect hotel performance, particularly if the improvements require closuresclosure of a significant number of rooms or other features of the hotels, such as ballrooms, meeting space and restaurants. These capital improvements reduce the availability of cash for other purposes and are subject to cost overruns and delays. In addition, because we depend on external sources of capital, we may not have the necessary funds to invest and, if we fail to maintain our properties in accordance with brand standards set by our managers, the manager may terminate the management agreement. Moreover, we may not necessarily realize a significant, or any, improvement in the performance of the hotels in which we make these investments.

Our hotels are geographically concentrated in a limited number of large urban gateway cities and, accordingly, we could be disproportionately harmed by adverse changes to these markets, a natural disaster or threat of a terrorist attack.

The concentration of our hotels in a limited number of large urban gateway cities exposes us to greater risk to local economic or business conditions, changes in hotel supply in these cities, and other conditions than more geographically diversified hotel companies.  Hotels in New York, Washington, DC, San Diego, San Francisco, Boston, Florida, Hawaii, Atlanta, and Los Angeles represented approximately 71% of our 2014 revenues.  An economic downturn, an increase in hotel supply in these cities, a natural disaster, a terrorist attack or similar disaster in any one of these cities likely would cause a decline in the hotel market and adversely affect occupancy rates, the financial performance of our hotels in these cities and our overall results of operations. For example, in October 2012, our operations in New York City and other East Coast properties were impacted negatively by Hurricane Sandy.  In 2013, decreased U.S. government demand for hotel rooms (approximately 5% of our business) in markets such as Washington, D.C. had a negative impact on our results of operations for the year.

In addition, certain of our hotels are located in markets that are more susceptible to natural disasters than others, which could adversely affect those hotels, the local economies, or both. For instance, our hotels in Florida may be susceptible to hurricanes, while our hotels in California may be susceptible to earthquakes.

The threat of terrorism also may negatively impact hotel occupancy and average daily rate, due to resulting disruptions in business and leisure travel patterns and concerns about travel safety. Hotels in major metropolitan areas, such as the gateway cities that represent our target markets, may be particularly adversely affected due to concerns about travel safety. The possibility of future attacks may hamper business and leisure travel patterns and, accordingly, the performance of our business and our operations.

The ownership of hotels outside the United States and the expansion of our business into new markets outside of the United States will expose us to risks relatingrelated to owning hotels in those foreigninternational markets.

Part of our business strategy is to expand our presence outside of the United States. As of December 31, 2011,2014, we own directly 1617 hotels located outside of the United States. We also are party to a joint venture that owns 1319 hotels in Europe and to a joint venture that owns one hotel in Australia and a non-controlling interest in seventhree hotels currently open and four hotels in development in India. We may have difficulty managing our expansion into new geographic markets where we have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area, or unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures and regulations. There are risks inherent in conducting business outside of the United States, which include:

risks of non-compliance with varied and unfamiliar employment laws and practices;

tax laws, which may provide for income or other taxes or tax rates that exceed those of the U.S. and which may provide that foreign earnings that are repatriated, directly or indirectly, are subject to dividend withholding tax requirements or other restrictions;

tax laws, which may provide for income or other taxes or tax rates that exceed those of the U.S. and which may provide that foreign earnings that are repatriated, directly or indirectly, are subject to dividend withholding tax requirements or other restrictions and which may affect our ability to repatriate non-U.S. earnings in a tax efficient manner;

compliance with and unexpected changes in regulatory requirements or monetary policy;

the willingness of domestic or foreign

the willingness of domestic or international lenders to provide financing and changes in the availability, cost and terms of such financing;

adverse changes in local, political, economic and market conditions;

insurance coverage related to terrorist events;


changes in interest rates and/or currency exchange rates;

insurance coverage related to terrorist events;

regulations regarding the incurrence of debt; and

changes in interest rates and/or currency exchange rates and difficulties in hedging these risks;

regulations regarding the incurrence of debt;

difficulties involved in managing an organization doing business in many different countries; and

difficulties in complying with U.S. rules governing REITs while operating outside of the United States.

Any of these factors could affect adversely our ability to obtain all of the intended benefits of our foreign countryinternational expansion. If we do not effectively manage this expansion and successfully integrate the foreigninternational hotels into our organization, our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may acquire hotel properties through joint ventures with third parties that could result in conflicts.

We have made investments in joint ventures in Europe and Asia and are exploring further investment opportunities in the United States, Asia, Europe and Latin America. We may, from time to time, invest as a co-venturer in other entities holding hotel properties instead of purchasing hotel properties directly.  We also may sell interests in existing properties to a third party as part of forming a joint venture with such third party.  Investments in joint ventures may involve risks not present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Co-venturers often share control over the operation of a joint venture. Actions by a co-venturer also could subject the assets to additional risks as a result of any of the following circumstances:

our co-venturer might have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our, or the joint venture’s, interests or goals; or

our co-venturer may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or objectives.

Although generally we will seek to maintain sufficient control of any joint venture in order to permit our objectives to be achieved, we might not be able to take action without the approval of our joint venture partners. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers from focusing their time and effort on our business.may negatively impact operations.

Our management agreements could affect the sale or financing of our hotels.

Under the terms of our management agreements, we generally may not sell, lease or otherwise transfer our hotels unless the transferee is not a competitor of the manager and the transferee assumes the related management agreements and meets specified other conditions. Our ability to finance or sell our properties, depending upon the structure of such transactions, may require the manager’s consent. If the manager does not consent to such sale or financing, we may be precluded from taking actions in our best interest.

Our mortgage debt contains provisions that may reduce our liquidity.

Certain of our mortgage debt requires that, to the extent cash flow from the hotels which secure such debt drops below stated levels, we escrow cash flow after the payment of debt service until operations improve above the stated levels. In some cases, the lender has the right under certain circumstances to apply the escrowed amount to the outstanding balance of the mortgage debt. If such provisions are triggered, there can be no assurance that the affected properties will achieve the minimum cash flow levels required to trigger a release of any escrowed funds. The amounts required to be escrowed may affect negatively our liquidity by limiting our access to cash flow after debt service from these mortgaged properties.

We may not be able to recover fully under our existing terrorism insurance program for losses caused by some types of terrorist acts, and federalneither U. S. nor foreign terrorism legislation does notinsurance laws or regulations ensure that we will be able to obtain terrorism insurance in adequate amounts or at acceptable premium levels in the future.

We generally obtain terrorism insurance as partto cover property damage caused by acts of our all-risk propertyterrorism under separate standalone policies of insurance program, as well as our general liability and directors’ and officers’ coverage. However, our all-risk policies have limitations, suchon U.S. properties which currently are subject to U.S. federal government cost sharing as per occurrence limits, annual aggregate coverage limits and sublimits, all of which might have to be shared proportionally across participating hotels under certain loss scenarios. Also, all-risk insurers only have to provide terrorism coverage to the extent mandated byprovided in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”). Property damage related to war and to nuclear, radiological, biological and chemical incidents is excludedOn January 12, 2015, President Obama signed into law H.R. 26, which extended TRIPRA through December 31, 2020.  We also have terrorism insurance under our policies. general liability program and in our program for directors’ and officers’ coverage. We also obtain terrorism insurance to cover some of our foreign properties through insurance programs involving or administered by foreign governments. We may not be able to recover fully under our existing terrorism insurance policies for losses caused by some types of terrorist acts, and neither U.S. nor foreign terrorism insurance legislation or regulations ensure that we will be able to obtain terrorism insurance in adequate amounts or at acceptable premium levels in the future.

While TRIPRA will reimburseallows direct insurers to be reimbursed for certain losses they incur on U.S. properties resulting from nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological biological and chemical(“NBCR”) perils, TRIPRA does not require insurers to offer coverage for these perils and, to date, insurers are not willing to provide this coverage, even with government reinsurance.reimbursement. Any damage related to war and to NBCR incidents, therefore, is excluded under policies covering our U.S. properties.  Moreover, many of our foreign properties are not covered against NBCR perils. We have a wholly-owned captive insurance company through which we obtain a policy for nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) coverage. This captive insurer has the same ability as other insurance companies to apply to the U.S. Treasury for reimbursement, as provided for in TRIPRA, and is subject to the same deductibles and co-insurance obligations. This potential reimbursement applies to property insurance only, and not to general liability or directors’ and officers’ insurance, and there are no assurances that we will be able to recover any or allcertain amount of our NBCR losses under this program.

We may be unable to satisfy the insurance requirements of our lenders.

Certain of the mortgage debt agreements for our properties and properties held by our European joint venture require us to maintain property insurance provided by carriers maintaining minimum ratings from Standard & Poor’s, A.M. Best or other rating agencies. Several of our mortgages contain requirements for the financial strength of insurers to be rated as high as AA by Standard & Poor’s. Due to upheavals in the financial markets, the number of insurers that carry that rating has been decreasing for a number of years. In 2009, 2010 and 2011, in cases where our insurance carriers did not meet the minimum financial strength requirements (there were two such cases in 2011),

we were able to obtain waivers from the lenders or they have provided written assurances that they are satisfied with the makeup of our pool of insurance providers. We cannot provide assurances that each of our lenders will continue to be satisfied with our insurance coverage, or with the rating levels of our carriers, or that our carriers will not be downgraded further. If any of these lenders becomes dissatisfied with our insurance coverage or the ratings of our insurance carriers, they may, on our behalf and in addition to other remedies, elect to procure additional property insurance coverage on our U.S. properties for NBCR perils through our wholly-owned subsidiary that meets their ratings requirements. Theacts as our direct insurer against such perils to the extent of reimbursement under TRIPRA. We ultimately are responsible for any loss borne by our insurance subsidiary.

As a result of the above, there remains uncertainty regarding the adequacy and cost of such additional property insurance wouldterrorism coverage that will be borne byavailable to protect our interests in the property or properties securing the loans. Also, the premiums associated with such coverage may be considerably higher than those associated withevent of terrorist attacks that impact our current insurance coverage.properties.    


Some potential losses are not covered by insurance.

We, or our hotel managers, carry comprehensive insurance coverage for general liability, property, business interruption and other risks with respect to all of our hotels and other properties. These policies offer coverage features and insured limits that we believe are customary for similar types of properties. Generally, our “all-risk” property policies provide coverage that is available on a per-occurrence basis and that, for each occurrence, has an overall limit, as well as various sub-limits, on the amount of insurance proceeds we can receive. Sub-limits exist for certain types of claims, such as service interruption, debris removal, expediting costs, landscaping replacement and natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, and may be subject to annual aggregate coverage limits. The dollar amounts of these sub-limits are significantly lower than the dollar amounts of the overall coverage limit. In this regard, hotels in certain of our markets, including California, Florida and New Zealand, have in the past been and continue to be particularly susceptible to damage from natural disasters. Recovery under the applicable policies also is subject to substantial deductibles and complex calculations of lost business income. There is no assurance that this insurance, where maintained, will fully fund the re-building or restoration of a hotel that is impacted by an earthquake, hurricane, or other natural disaster, or the income lost as a result of the damage. Our property policies also provide that all of the claims from each of our properties resulting from a particular insurable event must be combined together for purposes of evaluating whether the aggregate limits and sub-limits contained in our policies have been exceeded and, in the case where the manager of one of our hotels provides this coverage, any such claims will be combined with the claims of other owners participating in the manager’s program for the same purpose. Therefore, if an insurable event occurs that affects more than one of our hotels, or, in the case of hotels where coverage is provided by the manager, affects hotels owned by others, the claims from each affected hotel will be added together to determine whether the aggregate limit or sub-limits, depending on the type of claim, have been reached. Each affected hotel only may receive a proportional share of the amount of insurance proceeds provided for under the policy if the total value of the loss exceeds the aggregate limits available. We may incur losses in excess of insured limits and, as a result, we may be even less likely to receive complete coverage for risks that affect multiple properties, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, or certain types of terrorism.

In addition, there are other risks, such as certain environmental hazards, that may be deemed to fall completely outside the general coverage limits of our policies or may be uninsurable or too expensive to justify coverage. We also may encounter challenges with an insurance provider regarding whether it will pay a particular claim that we believe to be covered under our policy. Should a loss in excess of insured limits or an uninsured loss occur, or should we be unsuccessful in obtaining coverage from an insurance carrier, we could lose all or a part of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the hotel. In that event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

Cyber threats and the risk of data breaches or disruptions of our managers’ or our own information technology systems could materially adversely affect our business.

Our third party hotel managers are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to access, process, transmit and store proprietary and customer information. These complex networks include reservation systems, vacation exchange systems, hotel management systems, customer databases, call centers, administrative systems, and third party vendor systems.  These systems require the collection and retention of large volumes of personally identifiable information of hotel guests, including credit card numbers. Our hotel managers may store and process such proprietary and customer information both on systems located at the hotels we own and other hotels operated by our third party managers, their corporate locations and at third-party owned facilities, including for example, in a third-party hosted cloud environment. These information networks and systems can be vulnerable to threats such as system, network or internet failures; computer hacking or business disruption; cyber-terrorism; viruses, worms or other malicious software programs; and employee error, negligence or fraud. The risks from these cyber threats are significant. We rely on the security systems of our mangers to protect proprietary and customer information from these threats. Any compromise of our managers’ networks could result in a disruption to operations, such as disruptions in fulfilling guest reservations, delayed bookings or sales, or lost guest reservations. Any of these events could, in turn, result in disruption of the operations of the hotels we own that our managed by them, in increased costs and in potential litigation and liability. In addition, public disclosure, or loss of customer or proprietary information could result in damage to the manager’s reputation and a loss of confidence among hotel guests and result in reputational harm for the hotels owned by us and managed by them, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  

In addition to the information technologies and systems of our managers used to operate our hotels, we have our own corporate technologies and systems that are used to access, store, transmit, and manage or support a variety of business processes.  There can be no assurance that the security measures we have taken to protect the contents of these systems will prevent failures, inadequacies or interruptions in system services or that system security will not be breached through physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, and attacks by hackers. Disruptions in service, system shutdowns and security breaches in the information technologies and systems we use, including unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial reporting and compliance, and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties which could be significant.


Litigation judgments or settlements could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition.

We have accrued a potential litigation loss of approximately $56 million in connection with a lawsuit in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas involving the sale of land encumbered by a ground lease for the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter. See “Legal Proceedings” for more information on the verdict and the status of the appeal.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings in the normal course of business and are vigorously defending these claims; however, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but might be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

We also could become the subject of future claims by the operators of our hotels, individuals or companies who use our hotels, our investors, our joint venture partners or regulating entities and these claims could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and performance.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to hotels or businesses we acquire.

Assets and entities that we have acquired, or may in the future acquire, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements may not survive long enough for us to become aware of such liabilities and seek recourse against our sellers. While usually we require the sellers to indemnify us with respect to breaches of representations and warranties that survive, such indemnification often is limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. The total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with acquired hotels and entities may exceed our expectations, plus we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may adversely affect our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition. Finally, indemnification agreements between us and the sellers typically provide that the sellers will retain certain specified liabilities relating to the assets and entities acquired by us. While the sellers generally are contractually obligated to pay all losses and other expenses relating to such retained liabilities without regard to survival limitations, materiality thresholds, deductibles or caps on losses, there can be no guarantee that such arrangements will not require us to incur losses or other expenses in addition to those incurred by the sellers.

We depend on our key personnel.

Our continued success depends on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. None of our key personnel have employment agreements and we do not maintain key person life insurance for any of our executive officers. We cannot assure youThese individuals are important to our business and strategy and to the extent that these key personnel will remain employed by us. While we believe that weany of them departs and is not replaced with a qualified substitute, such person’s departure could find replacements for these key personnel, the loss of their services could have a significant adverse effect onharm our operations and financial performance.condition.

Exchange rate fluctuations could affect adversely our financial results.

As a result of the expansion of our foreigninternational operations, currency exchange rate fluctuations could affect our results of operations and financial position. We expect to generate an increasing portion of our revenue and expenses in such foreign currencies as the Euro, the Canadian Dollar,dollar, the Mexican Peso,peso, the Australian dollar, the New Zealand dollar, the British Pound,pound sterling, the Polish Zloty,zloty, Swedish krona, the Brazilian Realreal, the Indian rupee and the Chilean Peso. In 2011, these currencies represented approximately 6% of our revenues.peso. Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions and/or obtain local currency mortgage debt in order to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the value of these and other foreign currencies, these transactions, if entered into, will not eliminate entirely that risk entirely.risk. To the extent that we are unable to match revenue received in foreign currencies with expenses paid in thethat same currency, exchange rate fluctuations could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S. Dollars,dollars, if we generate revenues or earnings in other currencies, the conversion of such amounts intoto U.S. Dollarsdollars can result in an increase or decrease in the amount of our revenues or earnings.

Similarly, changes in the exchange rates of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar can result in increases or decreases in demand at our U.S. properties from international travelers coming to the United States. Because of the concentration of our hotels in U.S. gateway cities, we may have more exposure to fluctuations in international travel to the United States than other lodging companies not located as heavily in these markets.

Applicable REIT laws may restrict certain business activities.

As a REIT, Host Inc. is subject to various restrictions on the types of income it can earn, assets it can own and activities in which it can engage. Business activities that could be impactedrestricted by applicable REIT laws include, but are not limited to, activities such as developing alternative uses of real estate, including the development and/or sale of timeshare or condominium units. Due to these restrictions, we anticipate that we will conduct certain business activities, including those mentioned above, in one or more of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. Our taxable REIT subsidiaries are taxable as regular C corporations and are subject to federal, state, local, and, if applicable, foreign taxation on their taxable income.

We may be unable to sell properties because real estate investments are inherently illiquid.

Real estate properties generally cannot be sold quickly and, accordingly, we may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our investments could affect adversely our financial condition and the ability to service our debt. In addition, under the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs, we may be limited in our ability to recognize the full economic benefit from a sale of our assets.

Our ground lease payments may increase faster than the revenues we receive on the hotels located on the leased properties.

As of December 31, 2011, 38 of our hotels are subject to third-party ground leases (encumbering all or a portion of the hotel). These ground leases generally require periodic increases in ground rent payments, which are often based on economic indicators such as the Consumer Price Index. Our ability to pay ground rent could be adversely affected to the extent that our hotel revenues do not increase at the same or a greater rate than the increases in rental payments under the ground leases. In addition, if we were to sell a hotel encumbered by a ground lease, the buyer would be required to assume the ground lease, which may result in a lower sales price.

Environmental problems are possible and can be costly.

We believe that our properties comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and performance. Additionally, even after we have sold a property, we may be liable for environmental liabilities that occurred during our ownership. Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and remediate hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property. The owner or operator may be required to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage, and for investigation and remediation costs incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site. Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos.toxic or hazardous substances. These laws require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, that theythese substances and notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestosthem and that they undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building.precautions. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers.toxic or hazardous materials.


Compliance with other government regulations can be costly.

Our hotels are subject to various other forms of regulation, including Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), building codes and regulations pertaining to fire and life safety. Under the ADA, all public accommodations are required to meet certain federal requirementsrules related to access and use by disabled persons. These laws and regulations may be changed from time-to-time, or new regulations adopted, resulting in additional costs of compliance, including potential litigation. For example, the ADA was revised substantially revised in September 2010 and our facilities mustwere required to comply with the new regulations by March 15, 2012. A determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA could result in a court order to bring the hotel into compliance, imposition of finescivil penalties in cases brought by the Justice Department, or an award of attorneys’ fees to private litigants. Compliance with the ADA and other laws and regulations could require substantial capital expenditures. Any increased costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, the operations of our international properties are subject to a variety of United States and international laws and regulations, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). We have policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws, but we cannot assure you that we will continue to be found to be operating in compliance with, or be able to detect violations of, any such laws or regulations. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international properties might be subject and the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

Risks of Ownership of Host Inc.’s Common Stock

There are limitations on the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock and changes in control.

Host Inc.’s charter and bylaws,by-laws, the partnership agreement of Host L.P., and the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) contain a number of provisions, the exercise or existence of which could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for Host Inc.’s stockholders or Host L.P.’s unitholders or otherwise be in their best interests, including the following:

Restrictions on transfer and ownership of Host Inc.’s stock. To maintain Host Inc.’s qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of Host Inc.’s outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned in the last half of the taxable year, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, which, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, (the “Code”), may include certain entities. Because such ownership could jeopardizeIn addition, if Host Inc.’s qualification as a REIT, a person cannot own, directly, or by attribution,one or more owners of 10% or more of an interest inHost Inc., actually or constructively owns 10% or more of a tenant of Host Inc. lessee, nor canor a Host Inc. lesseetenant of any partnership in which Host Inc. is a partner, own,the rent received by Host Inc. either directly or by attribution, 10% or morethrough any such partnership from such tenant generally will not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income qualification tests of the Code, and, therefore, could jeopardize Host Inc.’s shares, in each casequalification as a REIT, unless exempted by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.the tenant qualifies as a TRS and certain other requirements are met.

Accordingly, Host Inc.’s charter prohibits ownership, directly or by attribution, by any person or persons acting as a group, of more than 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of shares of Host Inc.’s outstanding common stock, preferred stock or any other class or series of stock, each considered as a separate class or series for this purpose. Together, these limitations are referred to as the “ownership limit.”

Stock acquired or held in violation of the ownership limit will be transferred automatically to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and the intended acquirer of the stock in violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any distributions thereon, to vote those shares of stock or to receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the stock in excess of the lesser of the price paid for the stock or the amount realized from the sale. A transfer of shares of Host Inc.’s stock to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limit may be void under certain circumstances, and, in any event, would deny that person any of the economic benefits of owning shares of Host Inc.’s stock in excess of the ownership limit. These restrictions on transfer and ownership will not apply if Host Inc.’s Board of Directors determines that it is no longer is in Host Inc.’s best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions on transfer and ownership is no longer is required for Host Inc. to qualify as a REIT.

Removal of members of the Board of Directors. Host Inc.’s charter provides that, except for any directors who may be elected by holders of a class or series of shares of capital stock other than common stock, directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. Vacancies on Host Inc.’s Board of Directors may be filled, at any regular meeting or at any special meeting called for that purpose, by the affirmative vote of the remaining directors, except that a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors. Any vacancy resulting from the removal of a director by the stockholders may be filled by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.


Preferred shares; classification or reclassification of unissued shares of capital stock without stockholder approval. Host Inc.’s charter provides that the total number of shares of stock of all classes that Host Inc. has authority to issue is 1,100,000,000, consisting of 1,050,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has the authority, without a vote of stockholders, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock into other classes or series of stock, including common stock into preferred stock or vice versa, and to establish the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends orand other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series. Because Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has this power, it may give the holders of any class or series of stock terms, preferences, powers and rights, including voting rights, senior to the rights of holders of existing stock.

Certain provisions of Maryland law may limit the ability of a third-party to acquire control of Host Inc. Certain provisions of the MGCL may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from acquiring Host Inc., including:

o

business combination law. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, specified “business combinations” include mergers, consolidations, share exchanges, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, asset transfers or issuances or reclassifications of equity securities,combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s then outstanding shares of voting stock or an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time duringwithin the two yeartwo-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation (each, an “interested stockholder”),corporation) or an affiliate of theany interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Thereafter, anystockholder, and thereafter imposes two super-majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations: and

o

“control share” provisions that provide that holders of these specified business combinations must be approved by 80%“control shares” of the votes entitled to be casta corporation (defined as voting shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned or controlled by the holdersacquirer, would entitle the acquirer to exercise one of outstanding sharesthree increasing ranges of voting stock of the corporation and by two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder unless, among other conditions, the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as definedpower in the Maryland General Corporation Law, for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder. As a Maryland corporation which has not opted out of these provisions, Host Inc. is subject to the Maryland business combination statute. The statute provides various exemptions from its provisions, including for business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. The Board of Directors has not granted any such exceptions at this time.

Maryland control share acquisition law. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, “control shares”electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of issued and outstanding “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by the stockholders by the affirmative vote of holdersat least two-thirds of two-thirdsall of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares owned by the acquiror by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation. “Control shares” are voting shares which, if aggregated with all other voting shares owned by the acquiror or over which the acquirorinterested shares.

Host Inc. is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power: (1) one-tenth or more but less than one-third, (2) one-third or more but less than a majority, or (3) a majority or more of all voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares, subject to specified exceptions.the Maryland business combination statute. Our bylawsby-laws contain a provision exempting us from the control share provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law.MGCL. There can be no assurance that this bylawby-law provision exempting us from the control share provisions will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

Merger, consolidation, share exchange and transfer of Host Inc.’s assets. Under Maryland law and Host Inc.’s charter, subject to the terms of any outstanding class or series of capital stock, we can merge with or into another entity, consolidate with one or more other entities, participate in a share exchange or transfer Host Inc.’s assets within the meaning of the Maryland General Corporation LawMGCL if approved (1) by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors in the manner provided in the Maryland General Corporation Law,MGCL, and (2) by Host Inc.’s stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, except that any merger of Host Inc. with or into a trust organized for the purpose of changing Host Inc.’s form of organization from a corporation to a trust requires only the approval of Host Inc.’s stockholders holding a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on the merger. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law,MGCL, specified mergers may be approved without a vote of stockholders and a share exchange only is only required to be approved by the board of directors of a Maryland corporation if the corporation is the successor entity. Host Inc.’s voluntary dissolution also would require approval of stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.

Certain charter and bylawby-law amendments.Host Inc.’s charter contains provisions relating to restrictions on transfer and ownership of Host Inc.’s stock, fixing the size of the Board of Directors within the range set forth in the charter, removal of directors, the filling of vacancies, exculpation and indemnification of directors, calling special stockholder meetings and others, all of which may be amended only by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by Host Inc.’s stockholders holding two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Other charter amendments generally require approval of the

Board and the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. As permitted under the Maryland General Corporation Law,MGCL, Host Inc.’s charter and bylawsby-laws provide that the Board of Directors has the exclusive right to amend Host Inc.’s bylaws.by-laws. These provisions may make it more difficult to amend Host Inc.’s charter and bylawsby-laws to alter the provisions described herein that could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control or the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock, without the approval of the Board of Directors.

Shares of Host Inc.’s common stock that are or become available for sale could affect the share price of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We have in the past and may in the future issue additional shares of common stock to raise the capital necessary to finance hotel acquisitions, fund capital expenditures, refinance debt or for other corporate purposes. Sales of a substantial number of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock, or the perception that sales could occur, could affect adversely affect prevailing market prices for Host Inc.’s common stock. In addition, holders of OP units who redeem their units and receive, at Host Inc.’s election, shares of Host Inc. common stock will be able to sell those shares freely. As of December 31, 2011,2014, there are approximately 10.59.3 million OP units outstanding owned by third parties that are redeemable, which represents approximately 1.5%1% of all outstanding shares.units. Further, a substantial number of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock have been and will be issued or reserved for issuance from time to time under our employee benefit


plans. We currently maintain two stock-based compensation plans: (i) the comprehensive stock plan, whereby we may award to participating employees and directors restricted shares of common stock, options to purchase common stock and deferred shares of common stock, and (ii) an employee stock purchase plan. At December 31, 2011,2014, there were approximately 1917 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the comprehensive stock plan and employee stock purchase plan and 1.30.8 million outstanding options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $7.68$17.35 per share.

Also as of December 31, 2011,2014, Host L.P. had outstanding $963$400 million principal amount of exchangeable senior debentures that could becomecurrently are exchangeable under certain conditions, for shares of Host Inc.’s common stock. The principal portion for $388 million face amount of such exchangeable debentures is cash settled, and therefore no shares would be issued, unless Host Inc.’s share price exceeded the exchange rate for this series of debentures of $31.23 as of December 31, 2011. For another $400 million of such exchangeable debentures, Host Inc. has the option to issue cash, shares of Host Inc.’s common stock or any combination thereofthereof. Assuming the holders elected to exchange and we elected to settle in settlementshares of Host Inc. common stock, the debentures should theywould be presentedexchangeable for exchange.

On April 21, 2011, we entered into a Sales Financing Agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, through whichapproximately 31.1 million shares based on the current exchange price. The exchange price is adjusted proportionately based on dividends paid on Host Inc. may issue and sell, from time to time, shares having an aggregate offering pricecommon stock. While these debentures currently are exchangeable through March 31, 2015 based on past trading prices of up to $400 million. The salesHost Inc. common stock, whether they remain exchangeable after March 31, 2015 will be made in “at the market” offerings under SEC rules, including sales made directlydepend on the NYSE. BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC is acting as sales agent.then current trading prices of Host Inc. may sell shares of common stock under its program, from time to time, based on market conditions, although it is not under an obligation to sell any shares. As of December 31, 2011, $226 million of Host Inc.’s common stock have been issued and sold pursuant to the program. Shares of Host Inc.’s common stock, having an aggregate offering price of approximately $174 million, remain issuable from time to time under the agreement. Any additional shares of common stock issued by Host Inc., whether issued under this program or otherwise, would be available in the future for sale in the public markets.stock.

Our earnings and cash distributions will affect the market price of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We believe that the market value of a REIT’s equity securities is based primarily upon the market’s perception of the REIT’s growth potential and its current and potential future cash distributions, whether from operations, sales, acquisitions, development or refinancings, and secondarily is secondarily based upon the value of the underlying assets. For that reason, shares of Host Inc.’s common stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than the net asset value per share. To the extent that we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves or other purposes, rather than distributing the cash flow to stockholders, these retained funds, while increasing the value of our underlying assets, may impact negatively the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions likely would affect adversely the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock.

Market interest rates may affect the price of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We believe that one of the factors that investors consider important in deciding whether to buy or sell shares of a REIT is the dividend rate on the shares, considered as a percentage of the price of the shares, relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective purchasers of REIT shares may expect a higher dividend rate. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock to decrease.

Federal Income Tax Risks

To qualify as a REIT, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs are required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain, regardless of available cash or outstanding obligations.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute to its stockholders with respect to each year at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain. To the extent that Host Inc. satisfies this distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income and net capital gain for the taxable year, it will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax on its undistributed taxable income and net capital gain. In addition, Host Inc. will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions made by Host Inc. with respect to the calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of its ordinary income, (2) 95% of its net capital gain, and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior years, less excess distributions from prior years. Host Inc. intends to make distributions, subject to the availability of cash and in compliance with any debt covenants, to its stockholders in order to comply with the distribution requirement and to avoid the imposition of a significant nondeductible 4% excise tax and will rely for this purpose on distributions from Host L.P. and its subsidiaries. There are differences in timing between Host Inc.’s recognition of taxable income and its receipt of cash available for distribution due to, among other things, the seasonality of the lodging industry and the fact that some taxable income will be “phantom” taxable income, which is taxable income that is not matched by cash flow. Due to transactions entered into in years prior to Host Inc.’s conversion to a REIT, Host Inc. could recognize substantial amounts of “phantom” taxable income in the future. It is possible that any differences between the recognition of taxable income and the receipt of the related cash could require us to borrow funds or for Host Inc. to issue additional equity in order to enable Host Inc. to meet its distribution requirements and, therefore, to maintain its REIT status and to avoid the nondeductible 4% excise tax. In addition, because the REIT distribution requirements prevent Host Inc. from retaining earnings, generally we will be required to refinance debt at its maturity with additional debt or equity. It is possible that any of these sources of funds, if available at all, would not be sufficient to meet Host Inc.’s distribution and tax obligations.

Host L.P. owns 100% of the outstanding common stock and a portion of the outstanding preferred stock of two entities that have elected to be treated as REITs. Each of these subsidiary REITs are subject to the same requirements that Host Inc. must satisfy in order to qualify as a REIT, including the distribution requirements described above.

Adverse tax consequences would occur if Host Inc. or any of its subsidiary REITs fail to qualify as a REIT.

We believe that Host Inc. has been organized and has operated in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code, commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1, 1999, and Host Inc. currently intends to continue to operate as a REIT during future years. In addition, Host Inc. owns, through Host L.P., two entities that have elected to be treated as REITs. As the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT are extremely complex and interpretations of the federal income tax laws governing qualification and taxation as a REIT are limited, no assurance can be provided that Host Inc. currently qualifies as a REIT or will continue to qualify as a REIT or that each of Host Inc.’s subsidiary REITs qualify as a REIT or will continue to qualify as a REIT. If any of the subsidiary REITs were to fail to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that Host Inc. would fail to qualify as a REIT unless it (or the subsidiary REIT) could avail itself of certain relief provisions. New legislation, treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change significantly the tax laws with respect to an entity’s qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of its REIT qualification. If Host Inc. or any of theits subsidiary REITs were to fail to qualify as a REIT, and any available relief provisions did not apply, the non-qualifying REIT would not be allowed to take a deduction for distributions to its stockholders in computing its taxable income, and it would be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Moreover, unless entitled to statutory relief, the non-qualifying REIT would not qualify as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which REIT qualification was lost.

To qualify as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to satisfy several asset and income tests. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income and quarterly asset test requirements also depends upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that our hotel leases, interests in subsidiaries, or interests in securities of other issuers will not cause a violation of the REIT requirements.

Any determination that Host Inc. or one of its subsidiary REITs does not qualify as a REIT will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could reduce materially reduce the value of Host Inc.’s common stock. The additional tax liability of Host Inc. or the subsidiary REIT for the year, or years, in which the relevant entity did not qualify as a REIT would reduce its net earnings available for investment, debt service or distributions to stockholders. Furthermore, the non-qualifying entity no longer would be required to make distributions to its stockholders as a condition to REIT qualification and all of its distributions to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary C corporation dividends to the extent of its current and accumulated earnings and profits. This means that, if Host Inc. were to fail to qualify as a REIT, Host Inc.’s stockholders currently taxed as individuals would be taxed on those dividends at capital gain rates and Host Inc.’s corporate stockholders generally would be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to such dividends, subject in each case to applicable limitations under the Code. Host Inc.’s failure to qualify as a REIT also


would cause an event of default under Host L.P.’s credit facility, which default could lead to an acceleration of the amounts due thereunder, which, in turn, would constitute an event of default under Host L.P.’s outstanding debt securities.

If our leaseshotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors,” or if our hotels are not respected“qualified lodging facilities,” Host Inc. will fail to qualify as true leasesa REIT.

Each hotel with respect to which our TRS lessee pays rent must be a “qualified lodging facility.” A “qualified lodging facility” is a hotel, motel, or other establishment more than one-half of the dwelling units in which are used on a transient basis, including customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who legally is authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that all of the hotels leased to our TRS are qualified lodging facilities. Although we intend to monitor future acquisitions and improvements of hotels, the REIT provisions of the Code provide only limited guidance for making determinations under the requirements for qualified lodging facilities, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be satisfied in all cases.

If our hotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors,” Host Inc. likely will fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Each of the hotel management companies that enters into a management contract with our TRS must qualify as an “eligible independent contractor” under the REIT rules in order for the rent paid to us by our TRS to be qualifying income for our REIT income test requirements. Among other requirements, in order to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, a hotel manager must not own more than 35% of our outstanding shares (by value) and no person or group of persons can own more than 35% of our outstanding shares and the ownership interests of the hotel manager, taking into account only owners of more than 5% of our shares and, with respect to ownership interests in such hotel managers that are publicly traded, only holders of more than 5% of such ownership interests. Complex ownership attribution rules apply for purposes of these 35% thresholds. Although we monitor ownership of our shares by our hotel managers and their owners, and certain provisions of our charter are designed to prevent ownership of our shares in violation of these rules, there can be no assurance that these ownership levels will not be exceeded.

Our ownership of our TRS will be limited and our transactions with our TRS will cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on arm’s-length terms.

A REIT may own up to 100% of the equity interest of an entity that is a corporation for federal income tax purposes each of Host Inc.if the entity is a TRS. A TRS may hold assets and itsearn income that would not be considered as qualifying assets or as qualifying income if held or earned directly by a REIT, including gross operating income from hotel operations pursuant to hotel management agreements. Both the subsidiary REITs would failand the REIT must jointly elect to qualifytreat the subsidiary as a REIT.

To qualifyTRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock automatically will be treated as a REIT, Host Inc. must satisfy two gross income tests, pursuant to which specified percentages of its gross income must be passive income, such as rent. For the rent paid pursuant to the hotel leases with our TRS, which rental income currently constitutes substantially all of Host Inc.’s and each of our subsidiary REITs’ gross income, to qualify for purposesTRS. Overall, no more than 25% of the gross income tests, our leases must be respected as true leases forvalue of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRS. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT in order to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation.

Our TRS will pay federal income tax purposes and mustapplicable state and local income tax and, if applicable, foreign income tax on its taxable income, and its after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but is not required to be treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement.distributed by such TRS to us. We believe that the leasesaggregate value of the stock and securities of our TRS has been and will be respected as true leasesless than 25% of the value of our total assets (including our TRS stock and securities). Furthermore, we monitor the value of our investments in our TRS for federal income tax purposes.the purpose of ensuring compliance with TRS ownership limitations. There can be no assurance, however, that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)we will agree with this characterization. If the leases were not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, neither Host Inc. nor either of our subsidiary REITs would be able to satisfy either ofcomply with the two gross25% limitation discussed above.

Rents paid to us by our TRS may not be based on net income tests applicable to REITs and each likely would lose its REIT status.

If our affiliated lessees failor profits to qualify as taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs would fail to qualify as a REIT.

Rent paid by a lessee that is a “related party tenant” of Host Inc. will not be qualifying income for purposes“rents from real property.” We receive “percentage rents” calculated based on gross revenues of the two gross income tests applicablehotels subject to REITs. We lease substantially all of our hotelsleases to our subsidiaryTRS - not on net income or profits. If the IRS determines that is taxable asthe rents charged under our leases with our TRS are excessive, their deductibility may be challenged at the TRS level, and we could be subject to a regular C corporation and that has elected100% excise tax on “re-determined rent” or “re-determined deductions” to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary with respect to Host Inc. So long as any affiliated lessee qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary, it will not be treated as a “related party tenant.”the extent rents exceed an arm’s length amount. We believe that our affiliated lessees have qualified and will continue to qualify, and that the taxable REIT subsidiaries of each of our subsidiary REITs have qualified and will continue to qualify, to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes. Thererents reflect normal business practices in this regard but there can be no assurance however, that the IRS will not challenge the status of a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in disqualifying any of our affiliated lessees (including the taxable REIT subsidiaries of our subsidiary REITs) from treatment as a taxable REIT subsidiary, it is possible that Host Inc. or a subsidiary REIT would fail to meet the asset tests applicable to REITs and substantially all of its income would fail to qualify for the gross income tests. If Host Inc. or a subsidiary REIT failed to meet either the asset tests or the gross income tests, each likely would lose its REIT status.agree.

Despite the REIT status of each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs, we remain subject to various taxes.

One of the subsidiary REITs of Host Inc. will be required to pay federal income tax at the highest regular corporate rate on “built-in gain” recognized as a result of the sale of one or more of its hotel assetshotels prior to the expiration of the applicable 10-year holding period, including certain hotels acquired from Starwood and its affiliates in 2006. The total amount of gain on which the subsidiary REIT would be subject to corporate income tax if all of its built-in gain assets were sold in a taxable transaction prior to the expiration of the applicable 10-year holding period would be material to it. Recently enacted legislation, however, has reduced the 10-year period


to five years in the case of dispositions of assets in 2012, 2013, and 2014. In addition, we expect that we could recognize other substantial deferred tax liabilities in the future without any corresponding receipt of cash.

Notwithstanding Host Inc.’s status as a REIT, Host Inc. and our subsidiaries (including our subsidiary REITs) are subject to some federal, state, local and foreign taxes on their income and property. For example, Host Inc. and our subsidiary REITs will pay tax onproperty in certain types of income that are not distributed and will be subject to a 100% excise tax on transactions with a taxable REIT subsidiary that are not conducted on an arm’s length basis. Moreover, the taxable REIT subsidiaries of Host Inc. and our subsidiary REITs are taxable as regular C corporations and will pay federal, state and local income tax on their net income at the applicable corporate rates, and foreign taxes to the extent that they own assets or conduct operations in foreign jurisdictions.cases.  

Host L.P. is obligated under its partnership agreement to pay all such taxes (and any related interest and penalties) incurred by Host Inc.

If the IRS were to challenge successfully Host L.P.’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Host Inc. would cease to qualify as a REIT and would suffer other adverse consequences.

We believe that Host L.P. qualifies to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, it is not subject to federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of its partners, including Host Inc., is required to report and pay tax, if applicable, on such partner’s allocable share of its income. No assurance can be provided, however, that the IRS will not challenge Host L.P.’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating Host L.P. as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, Host Inc. would fail to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, accordingly, cease to qualify as a REIT. If Host L.P. fails to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or Host Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT, either failure would cause an event of default under Host L.P.’s credit facility that, in turn, could constitute an event of default under Host L.P.’s outstanding debt securities. Also, the failure of Host L.P. to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes would cause it to become subject to federal, state and foreign corporate income tax, which tax would reduce significantly the amount of cash available for debt service and for distribution to its partners, including Host Inc.

As a REIT, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs is subject to limitations on its ownership of debt and equity securities.

Subject to certain exceptions, a REIT generally is prohibited from owning securities in any one issuer to the extent that (1) the value of such securities exceeds 5% of the value of the REIT’s total assets, (2) the securities owned by the REIT represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities, or (3) the REIT owns more than 10% of the value of the issuer’s outstanding securities. A REIT is permitted to own securities of a subsidiary in an amount that exceeds the 5% value test and the 10% vote or value test if the subsidiary elects to be a taxable REIT subsidiary. However, a REIT may not own securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries that represent in the aggregate more than 25% of the value of the REIT’s total assets. If Host Inc. or any of its subsidiary REITs were to violate these ownership limitations, each likely would lose its REIT status.

Each of Host Inc. or its subsidiary REITs may be required to pay a penalty tax upon the sale of a hotel.

The federal income tax provisions applicable to REITs provide that any gain realized by a REIT on the sale of property held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a “prohibited transaction” that is subject to a 100% excise tax. Under existing law, whether property, including hotels, is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is a question of fact that depends upon all of the facts and circumstances with respect to the particular transaction. We intend to hold our hotels for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring and owning hotels and to make occasional sales of hotels consistent with our investment objectives. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS might not contend that one or more of these sales are subject to the 100% excise tax.

Risks Relating to Redemption of OP Units

A holder who offers its OP units for redemption may have adverse tax consequences.

A holder whosewho elects to redeem their OP units are redeemed will be treated for federal and state income tax purposes as having sold the OP units. The sale of these units is a taxable event and the holder thereof will be treated as realizing an amount equal to the sum of (1) the value of the common stock or cash the holder receives, and (2) the amount of Host L.P.’s nonrecourse liabilities allocated to the redeemed OP units. The gain or loss recognized by the holder of OP units is measured by the difference between the amount realized by the holder and the holder’s tax basis in the OP units redeemed (which tax basis includes the amount of Host L.P.’s nonrecourse liabilities allocated to the redeemed OP units). It is possible that the amount of gain and/or the tax liability related thereto that the holder recognizes and pays could exceed the value of the common stock or cash that the holder receives.

If a holder of OP units elects to offer them for redemption, the original receipt of the OP units may be subject to tax.

If a holder of OP units elects to have its units redeemed, particularly within two years of receiving them, there is a risk that the original receipt of the OP units may be treated as a taxable sale under the “disguised sale” rules of the Internal Revenue Code. Subject to several exceptions, the tax law generally provides that a partner’s contribution of property to a partnership and a simultaneous or subsequent transfer of money or other consideration from the partnership to the partner will be presumed to be a taxable sale. In particular, if money or other consideration is transferred by a partnership to a partner within two years of the partner’s contribution of property, the transactions are presumed to be a taxable sale of the contributed property, unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that the transfers are not a sale. On the other hand, if two years have passed between the original contribution of property and the transfer of money or other consideration, the transactions will not be presumed to be a taxable sale, unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that they should be so treated.

Differences between an investment in shares of Host Inc. common stock and Host L.P. OP units may affect redeemed holders of OP units.

If a holder ofelects to redeem their OP units, elects to have OP units redeemed, we will determine whether the holder receives cash or shares of Host Inc.’s common stock in exchange for the OP units. Although an investment in shares of Host Inc.’s common stock is substantially similar to an investment in Host L.P. OP units, there are some differences between ownership of OP units and ownership of Host Inc. common stock.differences.  These differences include form of organization, management structure, voting rights, liquidity and federal and state income taxation, some of which differences may be material to investors.

Item 1B.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item  2.

Item 2.

Properties

See Section “OurPart 1 Item 1. “Business—Our Hotel Properties” of Item 1Portfolio” above for a discussion of our hotel properties.hotels.

Item 3.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

On April 27,In 2005 we initiated a lawsuit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) seeking a declaration that a provision of the ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we had tortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property.

On February 8,In 2010, we received an adverse jury verdict in the 166th166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The jury found that we tortiously interfered with the attempted sale by Keystone of the land under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter and awarded Keystone $34.3 million in damages, plus statutory interest. In addition, the jury found that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property and awarded Keystone $39 million in damages, plus statutory interest. Keystone was only will be entitled to receive one of these damage awards. On February 12, 2010, theThe jury also awarded Keystone $7.5 million in exemplary damages with respect to the second claim. The trial court, however, subsequently granted our motion to disregard the jury’s exemplary damages award. On June 3, 2010, the trial court issued its final judgment awarding Keystone: (i) $39 million in damages for slander of title; or (ii) alternatively, $34.3 million for tortious interference of contract; (iii) approximately $6.8 million in pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; (iv) approximately $3.5 million in attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs; and (v) an additional $750,000 in attorneys’ fees for any appeal to the court of appeals and Texas Supreme Court.

On November 23,In 2011, a three-judge panel of the San Antonio Court of Appeals issued its memorandum opinion denying our appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2010 final judgment. In addition, the panel overturned the trial court’s decision to grant our motion to disregard the jury’s $7.5 million award of exemplary damages.

We believe that the memorandum opinion contains numerous legal errors and we intend to continue to vigorously pursue these issues on appeal. On January 17,In 2012, we filed a motion seeking rehearing fromPetition for Review in the three-judge panel and a motion for rehearing byTexas Supreme Court. On June 13, 2014, the entire seven-judgeTexas Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals.appeals judgment, and Host was no longer liable for the jury verdict and punitive damages award. Keystone requested a rehearing of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision, but that motion was denied on October 3, 2014, finalizing the Texas Supreme Court’s decision. As a result, in the third quarter of 2014, we reversed the $69 million loss contingency previously recorded related to this litigation and the initial adverse verdict. In addition, a court-ordered bond of $25 million was released on October 17, 2014.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings in the normal course of business including, but not limited to, disputes involving hotel-level contracts, employment litigation, compliance with laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, tax disputes and other


general matters. We are vigorously defending these claims; however, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but might be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In the following table we set forth certain information regarding those persons currently serving as executive officers of Host Inc. as of February 22, 2011.1, 2015. As a partnership, Host L.P. does not have executive officers.

 

Name and Title

Age

Age

Business Experience Prior to Becoming an

Executive Officer of Host Inc.

Richard E. Marriott

Chairman of the Board

73

76

Richard E. Marriott joined our company in 1965 and has served in various executive capacities. In 1979, Mr. Marriott was elected to the Board of Directors. In 1984, he was elected Executive Vice President and in 1986, he was elected Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. In 1993, Mr. Marriott was elected Chairman of the Board.

W. Edward Walter

President,

Chief Executive Officer and Director

56

59

W. Edward Walter joined our company in 1996 as Senior Vice President for Acquisitions and was later named Treasurer and Chief Operating Officer before becoming our Chief Financial Officer in 2003 and President, Chief Executive Officer and Director in October 2007.

Elizabeth A. Abdoo

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

53

56

Elizabeth A. Abdoo joined our company in June 2001 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel and became Executive Vice President in February 2003. She was elected Secretary in August 2001.

Minaz B. Abji

Executive Vice President,

Asset Management

58

61

Minaz B. Abji joined our company in 2003 as Executive Vice President, Asset Management. Prior to joining us, Mr. Abji was President of Canadian Hotel Income Properties REIT, a Canadian REIT located in Vancouver, British Columbia where he worked since 1998.

Larry K. Harvey

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

47Larry K. Harvey rejoined our company in February 2003 as Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller. In February 2006, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer. He was elected Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in 2007. He served as Treasurer until February 2010 and continues to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President,

Corporate Strategy and Fund Management

47Gregory J. Larson joined our company in October 1993. In 1998, Mr. Larson joined the Treasury group as Vice President of Corporate Finance. He assumed leadership of the Investor Relations department in 2000, was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2002, and was elected Treasurer in 2005. In November 2007, Mr. Larson was selected to lead our corporate strategy and fund management business and elected to Executive Vice President.

James F. Risoleo

Executive Vice President &

Managing Director, Europe

56James F. Risoleo joined our company in 1996 as Senior Vice President for Acquisitions, and was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer in 2000. Effective January 1, 2012, he became managing director of the Company’s European business activities.

Joanne G. Hamilton

Executive Vice President,

Human Resources

54

57

Joanne G. Hamilton joined our company as Executive Vice President, Human Resources in January 2010. Prior to joining our company, she was the Chief Human Resource Officer for Beers & Cutler, an accounting and consulting firm based in Vienna, Virginia from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Beers & Cutler, Ms. Hamilton served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources for Spirent PLC, a global telecommunications company, from 2002 to 2007.

2007.

Name

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

50

Gregory J. Larson joined our company in 1993. In 1998, Mr. Larson joined the Treasury group as Vice President of Corporate Finance. He assumed leadership of the Investor Relations department in 2000, was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2002, and Titlewas elected Treasurer in 2005. In November 2007, Mr. Larson was selected to lead our corporate strategy business and promoted to Executive Vice President. In May 2013 he was named Chief Financial Officer.

Age

Business Experience Prior

James F. Risoleo

Executive Vice President &

Managing Director, Europe

59

James F. Risoleo joined our company in 1996 as Senior Vice President for Acquisitions, and was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer in 2000. In January 2012, he became managing director of the Company’s European business activities.

Struan B. Robertson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Investment Officer

49

Struan B. Robertson joined our company in January 2013. From 1994 to Becoming an
Executive Officer2012 he held various positions at Morgan Stanley, most recently as Global Co-Head of Host Inc.its real estate and lodging investment banking business.

Brian G. Macnamara

Senior Vice President,

Corporate Controller

52

55

Brian G. Macnamara joined our company in February 1996, was promoted to Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller in February 2007, and was elected Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller in September 2007. Prior to serving as Assistant Corporate Controller, Mr. Macnamara served as Vice President, Financial Reporting and Corporate Real Estate.

PART II

 


PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc.

Host Inc.’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol “HST.” The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of Host Inc.’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape and dividends declared per share:

 

      Dividends 

Stock Price

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

  Stock Price   Declared 

 

High

 

 

Low

  High   Low   Per Share 

2010

      

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Quarter

  $14.96    $10.46    $0.01  

$

17.73

 

 

$

16.14

 

 

$

0.10

 

2nd Quarter

   17.09     12.83     0.01  

 

18.77

 

 

 

16.02

 

 

 

0.11

 

3rd Quarter

   15.91     12.64     0.01  

 

18.70

 

 

 

16.41

 

 

 

0.12

 

4th Quarter

   17.97     13.95     0.01  

 

19.44

 

 

 

17.09

 

 

 

0.13

 

2011

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Price

 

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Quarter

  $19.88    $16.62    $0.02  

$

20.47

 

 

$

18.00

 

 

$

0.14

 

2nd Quarter

   18.30     15.60     0.03  

 

22.77

 

 

 

20.05

 

 

 

0.15

 

3rd Quarter

   17.81     10.19     0.04  

 

23.09

 

 

 

21.20

 

 

 

0.20

 

4th Quarter

   14.90     9.78     0.05  

 

24.33

 

 

 

20.23

 

 

 

0.26

 

Under the terms of certain of our senior notes indenture and the credit facility, Host Inc.’s ability to pay dividends and make other payments is dependent on its ability to satisfy certain financial requirements. See Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition” and Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Financial Risks and Risks of Operation—Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the The terms of our indebtedness orand preferred units.units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.

As of February 16, 2012,20, 2015, there were 28,01421,066 holders of record of Host Inc.’s common stock. However, because many of the shares of itsour common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we believe that there are considerably more beneficial holders of itsour common stock than record holders. As of February 16, 2012,20, 2015, there were 1,8281,636 holders of OP units (in addition to Host Inc.). OP units are redeemable for cash, or, at our election, convertible intofor Host Inc.’s common stock.

Host Inc.’s ability to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code is facilitated by limiting the number of shares of its stock that a person may own. Its charter provides that, subject to limited exceptions, no person or persons acting as a group may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 9.8% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of shares of Host Inc.’s outstanding common stock, preferred stock or any other class of stock, each considered as a separate class or series for this purpose. Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has the authority to increase the ownership limit from time to time, but does not have the authority to do so to the extent that, after giving effect to such increase, any five beneficial owners of capital stock beneficially could beneficially own in the aggregate more than 49.5% of the outstanding capital stock. See Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks of Ownership of Host Inc.’s Common Stock—There are limitations on the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock and changes in control.”


Stockholder Return Performance

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on Host Inc.’s common stock against the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor’s Corporation Composite 500 Index and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust (“NAREIT”) Equity Index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in Host Inc.’s common stock and in each of the indexes, and also assumes the reinvestment of dividends.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Stockholder Returns 2006200920112014

 

 

  2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011 

2009

 

 

2010

 

 

2011

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  $100.00    $72.81    $33.92    $52.39    $80.45    $67.17  

$

100.00

 

 

$

153.52

 

 

$

128.17

 

 

$

138.59

 

 

$

176.43

 

 

$

223.19

 

NAREIT Equity Index

  $100.00    $84.31    $52.50    $67.20    $85.98    $93.10  

$

100.00

 

 

$

127.95

 

 

$

138.55

 

 

$

165.84

 

 

$

170.58

 

 

$

218.38

 

S&P 500 Index

  $100.00    $105.46    $66.51    $84.11    $96.78    $98.82  

$

100.00

 

 

$

115.06

 

 

$

117.49

 

 

$

136.30

 

 

$

180.42

 

 

$

205.14

 

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing of Host Inc. or Host L.P. (or any of their respective subsidiaries) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and IssuerFourth Quarter 2014 Host Inc. Purchases of Equity Securities  for Host L.P.

Period

 

Total Number of

Host Inc. Common Shares Purchased

 

 

 

Average Price Paid

per Common Share

 

Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

 

 

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Common Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

(in millions)

 

October 1, 2014 – October 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

November 1, 2014 – November 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014

 

 

577

*

 

$

23.86

*

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

577

 

 

$

23.86

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

*

Reflects shares of restricted stock withheld and used for the purpose of paying taxes in connection with the release of restricted common shares to plan participants (the purchase price listed is the weighted average price of Host Inc. common stock on the dates of release).



Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.

There is no established public trading market for our OP units and transfers of OP units are restricted by the terms of Host L.P.’s partnership agreement. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture and our credit facility, Host L.P.’s ability to make distributions and other payments is dependent on its ability to satisfy certain financial requirements. See “Risk Factors—Financial Risks and Risks of Operation—Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the terms of our indebtedness or preferred units.” The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, Host L.P.’s distributions declared per common OP unit:

 

Distributions
Declared Per
Common Unit

2010

1st Quarter

$.0102

2nd Quarter

.0102

3rd Quarter

.0102

4th Quarter

.0102

2011

1st Quarter

$.0204

2nd Quarter

.0306

3rd Quarter

.0409

4th Quarter

.0511

 

Distributions Declared
Per Common Unit

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

1st Quarter

$

0.1021

 

 

$

0.1430

 

2nd Quarter

 

0.1124

 

 

 

0.1532

 

3rd Quarter

 

0.1226

 

 

 

0.2043

 

4th Quarter

 

0.1328

 

 

 

0.2656

 

The number of holders of record of Host L.P.’s common OP units on February 16, 201220, 2015 was 1,828.1,636. The number of outstanding common OP units as of February 16, 201220, 2015 was 703,107,908,750,840,635 of which 692,672,814741,580,449 were owned by Host Inc. Under the terms of certain of our senior notes indenture and the credit facility, Host L.P.’s ability to make distributions and other payments is dependent on its ability to satisfy certain financial requirements. In addition, under the terms of Host L.P.’s preferred OP units, we are not permitted to make distributions on our common OP units unless all cumulative distributions have been paid on our preferred OP units. See Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition” and Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Financial Risks and Risks of Operation—Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the The terms of our indebtedness orand preferred units.units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.

Fourth Quarter 20112014 Host L.P. Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period

Total Number of

OP Units Purchased

Average Price Paid

Paid Per Common Unit

Total Number of CommonOP

Units Purchased as Part of

Publicly Announced

PlanPlans or Programs

Maximum Numbernumber (or
Approximate Dollar Value)


of Common Units that

May Yet Be Purchased

Under the Plans or Programs

(in millions)

September 10, 2011— October 9, 2011

1,537

October 1, 2014 — October 31, 2014

22,271

*

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*

October 10, 2011— November 9, 20111, 2014 — November 30, 2014

48,095

42,743

*

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*

November 10, 2011— December 9, 20111, 2014 — December 31, 2014

11,218

9,520*

*

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*

—  —  

December 10 2011— December 31, 2011

10,0601.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*—  —  

 

 

Total

70,910—  —  

 

 

Total

74,534

 

*

Reflects common OP units redeemed by Host Inc. in exchange for shares of its common stock.

**

Reflects (1) 8,956 common OP units redeemed by holders in exchange for shares of Host Inc.’s common stock and (2) 564 common OP units cancelled upon cancellation of 577 shares of Host Inc.’s common stock (and used for the purpose of paying taxes in connection with the release of restricted common shares to plan participants).


Item 6.

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

The following table presents certain selected historical financial data which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the five years ended December 31, 2011. The following information2014 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

 

   Calendar year 
   2011  2010  2009  2008   2007 
   (in millions, except per share amounts) 

Income Statement Data:

       

Revenues

  $4,998   $4,428   $4,135   $5,108    $5,215  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (12  (128  (197  382     532  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (1)

   (4  (4  (61  32     202  

Net income (loss)

   (16  (132  (258  414     734  

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

   (15  (130  (252  395     703  

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

   (15  (138  (261  386     694  

Basic earnings (loss) per common share :

       

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (.01  (.20  (.34  .68     .94  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01  (.11  .06     .39  

Net income (loss)

   (.02  (.21  (.45  .74     1.33  

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

       

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (.01  (.20  (.34  .66     .94  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01  (.11  .06     .38  

Net income (loss)

   (.02  (.21  (.45  .72     1.32  

Dividends declared per common share (2)

   .14    .04    .25    .65     1.00  

Balance Sheet Data:

       

Total assets

  $13,068   $12,411   $12,555   $11,950    $11,811  

Debt

   5,753    5,477    5,837    5,876     5,515  

Preferred stock

   —      —      97    97     97  

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

4,714

 

 

$

4,154

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

747

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(137

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of

     tax (1)

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

5

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

747

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(132

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Host

     Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(130

)

Net income (loss) available to common

     stockholders

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(138

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.97

 

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

.97

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.08

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.96

 

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

.96

 

 

 

.42

 

 

 

.08

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

Dividends declared per common share

 

 

.75

 

 

 

.46

 

 

 

.30

 

 

 

.14

 

 

 

.04

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

13,090

 

 

$

12,411

 

Debt

 

 

3,992

 

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

5,753

 

 

 

5,477

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Discontinued operations reflects the operations of properties classified as held for sale, the results of operations of properties prior to their disposition and the gain or loss on those dispositions. We adopted ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014, pursuant to which we only report discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.


(2)

Item 6.

See Item 5. “Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc.”

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

The following table presents certain selected historical financial data which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. for the five years ended December 31, 2011. The following information2014 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

   Calendar year 
   2011  2010  2009  2008   2007 
   (in millions, except per unit amounts) 

Income Statement Data:

       

Revenues

  $4,998   $4,428   $4,135   $5,108    $5,215  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (12  (128  (197  382     532  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (1)

   (4  (4  (61  32     202  

Net income (loss)

   (16  (132  (258  414     734  

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

   (15  (132  (257  411     728  

Net income (loss) available to common unitholders

   (15  (140  (266  402     719  

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

       

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (.01  (.21  (.34  .68     .96  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (.01  —      (.10  .06     .37  

Net income (loss)

   (.02  (.21  (.44  .74     1.33  

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

       

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (.01  (.21  (.35  .66     .95  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   (.01  —      (.10  .06     .37  

Net income (loss)

   (.02  (.21  (.45  .72     1.32  

Distributions declared per common unit (2)

   .143    .0408    .025    .65     1.00  

Balance Sheet Data:

       

Total assets

  $13,068   $12,410   $12,553   $11,948    $11,809  

Debt

   5,753    5,477    5,837    5,876     5,515  

Preferred units

   —      —      97    97     97  

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

 

(in millions, except per unit amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

4,714

 

 

$

4,154

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

747

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(137

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of

     tax (1)

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

5

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

747

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(132

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Host

     Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(132

)

Net income (loss) available to common

     unitholders

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(140

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

Distributions declared per common unit

 

 

.766

 

 

 

.470

 

 

 

.306

 

 

 

.143

 

 

 

.0408

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

13,090

 

 

$

12,410

 

Debt

 

 

3,992

 

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

5,753

 

 

 

5,477

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Discontinued operations reflects the operations of properties classified as held for sale, the results of operations of properties prior to their disposition and the gain or loss on those dispositions. We adopted ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014, pursuant to which we only report discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.


(2)See Item 5. “Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.”

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Host Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered REIT.REIT that owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and in which it holds approximately 99% of its common OP units as of December 31, 2014. The remainder of Host L.P.’s common OP units are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. Host Inc. has the exclusive and holds 98.5% of its partnership interests.complete responsibility for Host L.P. is a limited partnership operating through an umbrella partnership structure. As of February 22, 2012, we own 121 hotels, primarily consisting of luxury’s day-to-day management and upper upscale properties. control.

Host Inc. is the largest lodging REIT in NAREIT’s composite index. A REIT is a legal entity that owns real estate assetsindex and one of the largest owners of luxury and upper upscale hotel properties. As of February 20, 2015, we own 114 hotels in the United States and internationally and have minority ownership interests in an additional 25 hotels through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to reduce or eliminate federal income taxes atjoint ventures in the corporate level.

OurUnited States, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. These hotels are primarily operated under brand names that are among the most respected and widely recognized in the lodging industry. The majority of our properties are luxury and upper upscale that are located in central business districts of major cities, near airports and in resort/conference destinations that benefit from significant barriers to entry by competitors. In 2011,Since 2004, the percentage of revenues from our target markets has increased from approximately 79%65% to 80% in 2014, as we have focused our acquisition efforts on these locations, and similarly disposed of our revenues were generated by our urban and resort/conference hotels.non-core assets. While our hotels in these markets still are still subject to competitive pressures, we believe this strategy should allow usof combining quality assets with superior locations provides opportunities to achieve room rate and occupancy premiums in excess of those of our competitors. We seek to maximize the value of our portfolio through aggressive asset management by assisting the managers of our hotels in optimizing property operations and by completing strategic capital improvements.

Our Customers

The majority of our customers fall into three broad groups: transient business, group business and contract business, which accounted for approximately 59%61%, 36%34%, and 5%, respectively, of our 20112014 room sales. Similar to the majority of the lodging industry, we further categorize business within these categories based on characteristics they have in common as follows:

Transient business broadly represents individual business or leisure travelers. Business travelers make up the majority of transient demand at our hotels. Therefore, we will be significantly more affected by trends in business travel versusthan trends in leisure demand. The three key subcategoriesFor a discussion of the transient business group are:our customer categories, see “ – Our Customers”.

Retail: This is the benchmark rate that a hotel publishes and offers to the general public. It typically is for travelers that do not have access to negotiated or discount rates. It includes the “rack rate,” which typically is applied to rooms during high demand periods and is the highest rate category available. Retail room rates will fluctuate more freely depending on anticipated demand levels (e.g. seasonality and weekday vs. weekend stays).

Special Corporate: This is a negotiated rate offered to companies and organizations that provide significant levels of room night demand to the hotel or to hotel brands generally. These rates are typically negotiated annually at a discount to the anticipated retail rate.

Discount: This category encompasses all discount programs, such as AAA and AARP discounts, government per diem, rooms booked through wholesale channels, frequent guest program redemptions, and promotional rates and packages offered by a hotel.

Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. The three key sub-categories of the group business category are:

Association: group business related to national and regional association meetings and conventions.

Corporate: group business related to corporate meetings (e.g., product launches, training programs, contract negotiations, and presentations).

Other: group business predominately related to social, military, education, religious, fraternal and youth and amateur sports teams, otherwise known as SMERF business.

The final category is contract demand, which refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Contract rates are usually utilized by hotels that are located in markets that are experiencing consistently lower levels of demand. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand for our hotels.

Understanding Our Performance

Our Revenues and Expenses. Our hotels are operated by third-party managers under long-term agreements, pursuant to which they typically earn base and incentive management fees based on the levels of revenues and profitability of each individual hotel. We provide operating funds, or working capital, which the managers use to purchase inventory and to pay wages, utilities, property taxes and other hotel-level expenses. We generally receive a cash distribution from our hotel managers each four-week or monthly accounting period,month, which distribution reflects hotel-level sales less property-level operating expenses (excluding depreciation).

Revenues for owned hotels represent 95% of our total revenue. The following table presents the components of our hotel revenue as a percentage of our total revenue:

 

% of 20112014

Revenues

•    

·

Rooms revenue. Occupancy and average daily room rate are the major drivers of rooms revenue. The business mix of the hotel (group versus transient and premiumretail versus discount business) is a significant driver of room rates.

64

60

%

•    

·

Food and beverage revenue. Occupancy and the type Food & beverage revenues consist of customer staying at the hotel are the major drivers of food and beverage revenue (i.e.,revenues from group business typically generates more food and beverage business through catering functions, when compared to transient business, which may or may not utilizeinclude both banquet revenue and audio and visual revenues, as well as outlet revenues from the hotel’s restaurants).restaurants and lounges at our properties.

29

29

%

•    

·

Other revenue. Occupancy, the nature of the property (i.e.(e.g., resort, etc.) and its price point are the main drivers of other ancillary revenue, such as parking, golf course, spa, entertainment and other guest services. This category also includes retail and apartment rental revenue.

7

6

%


Hotel operating expenses represent approximately 98%99% of our total operating costs and expenses. The following table presents the components of our hotel operating expenses as a percentage of our total operating costs and expenses:

 

% of 20112014
Operating
Operating
Costs and

Expenses

•    

·

Rooms expense. These costs include housekeeping, reservation systems, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Occupancy is the major driver of rooms expense. These costs can increase based on increases in salaries and wages, as well as on the level of service and amenities that are provided.

20

18

•    

·

Food and beverage expense. These expenses primarily include food, beverage and the associated labor costs. Occupancycosts and the type of customer staying at the hotel (i.e., catered functions generally are more profitable than outlet sales) are the major drivers of food and beverage expense, which correlateswill correlate closely with food and beverage revenue.revenues.  Group functions with banquet sales and audio and visual components will generally have lower overall costs as a percentage of revenues than outlet sales.

24

23

% of 2011
Operating
Costs and

Expenses

•    

·

Other departmental and support expenses. These expenses include labor and other costs associated with other ancillary revenues,revenue, such as parking, golf courses, spas, entertainment and other guest services, as well as labor and other costs associated with administrative departments, sales and marketing, repairs and minor maintenance and utility costs.

27

27

•    

·

Management fees. Base management fees are computed as a percentage of gross revenue. Incentive management fees generally are paid when operating profits exceed certain threshold levels.

5

4

•    

·

Other property-level expenses. These expenses consist primarily of real and personal property taxes, ground rent, equipment rent and property insurance. Many of these expenses are relatively inflexible and do not necessarily change based on changes in revenuesrevenue at our hotels.

8

12

•    

·

Depreciation and amortization expense. This is a non-cash expense that changes primarily based on the acquisition and disposition of hotel properties and the level of past capital expenditures.

15

14

The expense components listed above are based on those presented in our consolidated statements of operations. It also is worth noting that wage and benefit costs are spread among various line items. Taken separately, these costs represent approximately 55% of our hotel operating expenses.

Key Performance Indicators. Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR is defined as the product of the average daily room rate charged and the average daily occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include food and beverage, or parking, telephone or other guest service revenues generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it generally is considered the key indicator of core revenues for many hotels.

RevPAR changes that are driven predominately by occupancy have different implications on overall revenue levels, as well as incremental operating profit, than do changes that are driven predominately by average room rate. For example, increases in occupancy at a hotel wouldwill lead to increases in rooms revenues and ancillary revenues, such as food and beverage revenue, as well as additional incremental costs (including housekeeping services, utilities and room amenity costs). RevPAR increases due to higher room rates, however, wouldwill not result in additional room-related costs, with the exception of those charged as a percentage of revenue. As a result, changes in RevPAR driven by increases or decreases in average room rates have a greater effect on profitability than do changes in RevPAR caused by occupancy levels.

In discussing our operating results, we present RevPAR and certain other financial data for our hotels on a comparable hotel basis. Comparable hotels are those properties that we have owned for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared.compared and which operations have been included in our consolidated results. Comparable hotels do not include the results of properties acquired or sold, or that incurred business interruption due to significant property damage or large scale capital improvements. We also present RevPAR separately for our comparable consolidated domestic and international (both on a nominal and constant dollar basis) hotels, as well as for our joint venture in Europe. We provide RevPAR results in constant currency due to the number of consolidated properties we have internationally and the effect that exchange rates have on our reporting. We use constant currency because we believe it is useful to investors as it provides clarity on how the hotels are performing in their local markets. For all other measures (net income, operating profit, EBITDA, FFO, etc.) our discussion refers only to nominal US$, which is consistent with our financial statement presentation under GAAP.


We also evaluate the performance of our business through certain non-GAAP financial measures. Each of these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered by investors as supplemental measures to GAAP performance measures such as total revenues, operating profit, net income and earnings per share. We provide a more detailed discussion of these non-GAAP financial measures, how management uses such measures to evaluate our financial condition and operating performance and a discussion of certain limitations of such measures in “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Our non-GAAP financial measures include:

NAREIT Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO per diluted share.We use NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share as a supplemental measuremeasures of company-wide profitability. NAREIT adopted FFO in order to promote an industry-wide measure of REIT operating performance. We also

adjust NAREIT FFO for gains and losses on extinguishment of debt, acquisition costs and litigation gains or losses outside the ordinary course of business, which we believe provides useful supplemental information about our ongoing operating performance.business.

Comparable Hotel adjusted operating profit.EBITDA. Hotel adjusted operating profitEBITDA measures property-level results before debt service, depreciation and corporate expenses (as this is a property level measure) and is a supplemental measure of aggregate property-level profitability. We use hotel adjusted operating profitHotel EBITDA and associated margins to evaluate the profitability of our comparable hotels.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), is a commonly usedsupplemental measure in many industries. Management believes that such measure provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations as it helps us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating performance of our propertiesoperating performance and facilitates comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. We also adjust EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain items, such asfor gains and losses related to real estate transactions, and impairment losses and litigation gains or losses outside the ordinary course of business (“Adjusted EBITDA”), provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance..

Summary of 20112014 Operating Results

The following table reflects certain line items from our audited statements of operations and the significant operating statistics (in millions, except per share and hotel statistics):

Historical Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

Total revenues

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

$

5,059

 

 

 

2.1

%

Net income

 

 

747

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

129.8

%

 

 

63

 

 

 

415.9

%

Operating profit

 

 

710

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

38.7

%

 

 

362

 

 

 

41.4

%

Operating profit margin under GAAP

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

9.9

%

 

 

340

bps

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

270

bps

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

1,402

 

 

$

1,306

 

 

 

7.4

%

 

$

1,190

 

 

 

9.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

.96

 

 

$

.42

 

 

 

128.6

%

 

$

.08

 

 

 

425.0

%

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

 

 

1.57

 

 

 

1.26

 

 

 

24.6

%

 

 

1.04

 

 

 

21.2

%

Adjusted FFO per diluted share

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

1.31

 

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

1.10

 

 

 

19.1

%

 

   Operating Results
(in millions, except per share and hotel statistics)
Year ended December 31,
 
   2011  2010  % Change
2010 to 2011
  2009  % Change
2009 to 2010
 

Total revenues

  $4,998   $4,428    12.9 $4,135    7.1

Comparable hotel revenues (a)

   4,315    4,087    5.6    N/A    4.2  

Net loss

   (16  (132  87.9    (258  48.8  

Adjusted EBITDA

   1,018    834    22.1    798    4.5  

Diluted loss per share

  $(.02 $(.21  90.5 $(.45  53.3

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

   .89    .68    30.9    .51    33.3  

Adjusted FFO per diluted share

   .92    .74    24.3    .79    (6.3

Comparable hotel RevPAR (a)

  $129.97   $122.47    6.1  N/A    5.8

Comparable Hotel Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

2013 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

Comparable hotel revenues

 

$

4,973

 

 

$

4,740

 

 

 

4.9

%

 

$

4,670

 

 

$

4,452

 

 

 

4.9

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA

 

 

1,318

 

 

 

1,200

 

 

 

9.8

%

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

1,089

 

 

 

9.3

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA margin

 

 

26.5

%

 

 

25.3

%

 

 

120

bps

 

 

25.5

%

 

 

24.5

%

 

 

100

bps

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Constant US$ (2)

 

 

5.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Nominal US$ (2)

 

 

5.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable domestic RevPAR

 

 

5.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable international RevPAR - Constant US$ (2)

 

 

10.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(1)

Comparable hotel operating statistics for 20112014 and 20102013 are based on 104106 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2011. The percent change from 20092014, while the comparable hotel operating statistics for 2013 and 20102012 are based on 108105 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2010.2013.

(2)

For a discussion of our constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”


During 2011,In 2014, on a constant US$ basis, RevPAR at our comparable hotels increased 6.1%5.7% compared to 20102013, marking the fifth straight year of comparable RevPAR growth in excess of 5.5%. Our results were impacted by a number of key factors, starting with the improving U.S. economy, which saw GDP growth and a decline in unemployment, though this was partially offset by limited wage growth which tempered consumer spending. Corporate business, a key demand driver of our portfolio, experienced slower, but solid growth in 2014 when compared to 2013. Our domestic gateway properties have benefited from increases in demand from travel to the U.S. as international arrivals increased, though we expect that to moderate as a result of improvementsthe strengthening dollar. Lastly, many of our hotels’ results were impacted by increased capital expenditures projects in overall lodging demand, combinedthe fourth quarter of 2014, which slowed RevPAR and profit growth, a trend that we expect will be more significant throughout 2015.

Rooms

RevPAR growth in 2014 at our comparable hotels was both rate and occupancy driven, as room rates improved 4.8% on a constant US$ basis and occupancy improved 60 basis points to 77%, our highest occupancy since our prior peak. Our operators have been able to leverage the higher occupancy levels in order to gradually increase room rates, particularly for our transient business, which increased 5.1%. Group revenue increased 5.6%, driven by a 2.7% increase in room nights coupled with low supplya 2.8% increase in rates. Group business was inconsistent throughout the year, as strong growth in the industry. While the recovery in the overall economy has beenfirst and third quarters were each followed by slower than we expected, 2011 marked the second year of solid growth in the lodging industrysecond quarter and a decline in the fourth quarter, partially due to renovations.

Comparable RevPAR at our domestic portfolio increased 5.4% for the year, driven by a 4.6% improvement in room rates. Our San Francisco and Seattle hotels led our domestic portfolio with RevPAR increases of 15.2% and 12.8%, respectively, as already high levels of demand and solid group business allowed for average room rate increases of approximately 12% in business investmentboth markets. Our New York and corporate profits,Washington, D.C. markets lagged the portfolio with RevPAR increases of 3.3% and 1.9%, respectively, as well as low levelsboth markets have had a recent influx of new supply, offset the effectsimpact of lower than anticipated GDP growthwhich will continue into 2015.

On a constant US$ basis, RevPAR at our comparable consolidated international hotels increased 10.2% in 2014, led by our Latin American properties with an 18.4% increase in average room rate and continued high unemployment. As expected during the recovery process, initially the growtha 23.3% increase in RevPAR on a constant US$ basis. The JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro benefited from the FIFA World Cup, resulting in a RevPAR increase of 27.3% for the full year. Comparable RevPAR in constant euros for the Euro JV properties, which are unconsolidated, increased 2.5% for the full year reflecting the continued slow growth of the region.

Rooms expenses increased 4.8% for the full year on a comparable hotel basis, driven by an increase in travel agent commissions and an increase in the rooms hourly wage rate of 3.1%. As a result, cost per occupied room increased 4.0% at our comparable hotels. For the year, rooms department profit at our comparable hotels increased 5.5%.

Food and Beverage

Food and beverage revenues at our comparable hotels increased 3.8% for 2014. The increase was driven primarily by improvements in occupancy. During 2011,a positive mix shift to banquet and audio visual revenues, which provide higher overall operating margins than outlet revenue, as occupancy approachedcatered functions generally are more normalized levels, RevPAR growth was driven increasingly by increases in average rates.profitable. For 2011, RevPAR growth reflects the 4.3% increase in average daily rates, and an occupancy improvement of 1.3 percentage points. The RevPAR growth of our properties was tempered, however, by the effects of major capital projects that were on-going throughout the year, particularly thosebanquet and audio visual revenues at some of our largest properties, such as the Sheraton New York Hotel & Towers and the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown. RevPAR would havecomparable hotels increased an additional 40 basis points for the full year if the results of these two properties were excluded. Combined with the improvements in RevPAR,5.1%. Overall, total owned hotel revenues increased 7.0% due to the inclusion of the operations of 14 hotels acquired in 2010 and 2011 (the “Recent Acquisitions”), which increased revenues by $353 million and $57 million, respectively.

Rate increases for the year have been driven primarily by increases in transient business across all segments in the category, as well as improvements in corporate group business. Group demand has recovered more slowly as weak association group demand has offset the improvement in corporate group demand.

Food and beverage revenue for 2011 increased by 10.5% compared to 2010, which increase was driven by a 5.5% improvement in comparable hotel food and beverage revenue and incremental food and beverage revenues from our Recent Acquisitionsincreased by 2.9% compared to 2013. Increased productivity, along with the shift of $74 million, or 5.7%business to banquet and audio visual revenues, contributed to a 6.8% increase in food and beverage department profit for the year. Improvements in banquet and audio-visual revenue were a significant driver of the growth in

Other revenues

Other revenues at our comparable food and beverage revenues.

As a result of these trends, total comparable revenues for our owned hotels increased $228 million, or 5.6%, to approximately $4.3 billion for the year. In addition to the hotel revenues for our owned hotels described above, our other revenues increased $54 million5.9% due to incremental revenue froman increase in garage revenues, coupled with higher rents throughout the 53 Courtyard by Marriott hotels leased from Hospitality Properties Trust that previously had been sublet (the “HPT portfolio”; see “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations”). Therefore, total revenues increased $570 million, or 12.9%, to approximately $5.0 billion for 2011.portfolio.  

Operating Profit

Operating margins (calculated based on GAAP operating profit as a percentage of GAAP revenues) increased 150340 basis points for the full year 2011. Operating2014. These operating margins calculated using GAAP measures are affected significantly affected by several items, including our Recent Acquisitions.operations from recently acquired hotels, dispositions, depreciation, impairments, and corporate expenses. Our comparable hotel adjustedEBITDA margins, which exclude these items, increased 120 basis points to 26.5%. The improvements were driven by the increase in average room rate, as well as the 6.8% increase in comparable food and beverage profit described above. Additionally, declines in several of our expense categories at our comparable hotels, including incentive management fees and property insurance, as well as below inflationary growth in utilities and nearly flat ground rent, contributed to the growth in operating profit margins during 2014. These expense categories are expected to increase at a more normalized level in 2015, which exclude, among other items, operations from our recently acquired hotels, depreciation and corporate expenses, increased 90 basis points.will slow overall margin growth.


Net lossincome for Host Inc. decreased $116improved $422 million in 20112014 to a loss of $16 million and Adjusted EBITDA increased $184 million, or 22.1%, to $1,018$747 million. Net loss, GAAP operating profit and Adjusted EBITDA all were affected negatively by the forfeiture of the $15 million deposit on the terminated transaction to acquire the Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C. in December 2011.

Host Inc.’s diluted lossincome per common share decreased $.19improved $0.54 per common share to a loss in 2011 of $.02. The reduction in our loss$0.96 per common share. Net income and diluted income per share reflectsbenefited from the improvement in operating results at our hotels as described above. Host Inc.’s NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share of $.89 and $.92, respectively, increased 30.9% and 24.3% for 2011. For 2011, the $15 million deposit forfeiture discussed above reduced NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share by $.02.following:

·

Adjusted EBITDA increased $96 million, or 7.4%, to $1.4 billion, reflecting improvement in hotel operations and an increase in Adjusted EBITDA from our unconsolidated joint ventures, partially offset by a decline due to the net effect of our recent acquisitions and dispositions;

·

a decrease in interest expense of $90 million due to a reduction in the overall debt balance and weighted average interest rate, combined with a decline in debt extinguishments costs compared to the prior year. The growth in earnings, coupled with the decrease in interest expense,  resulted in an increase in Host Inc.’s Adjusted FFO per diluted share of 14.5% to $1.50 per diluted share;

·

an increase in gains on asset sales of $105 million (in 2013, certain of the gains are included in discontinued operations); and

·

a gain of $71 million recorded in 2014 for the successful resolution of litigation.

The trends and transactions described above for Host Inc. affected similarly affected the operating results for Host L.P, as the only significant difference between the Host Inc. and Host L.P. statements of operations relates to the treatment of income attributable to the outside partners of Host L.P. For the year, Host L.P.’s net loss declined $116income improved $422 million to $16$747 million, and the lossdiluted income per dilutedcommon unit declined $.19improved $0.56 per common unit to $.02$0.99 per common unit.

Investing Activities2015 Outlook

Acquisitions. We believe thatFor 2015, we expect continued strength in the U.S. lodging industry continues to present opportunities to purchase assets with highas overall growth potential at a significant discount to replacement cost. Many of the prospective acquisition opportunities arein GDP, driven by strong employment, consumer confidence and business investment, is expected to be driven by debt maturities on over-leveraged assets that were refinanced in 2006 and 2007 as owners may look to sell as they face refinancing challenges with lower loan to value ratios and higher interest rates. In many cases, we expect that these owners will seek to meet their financing obligations through an all cash sale of the hotel. As the recovery continues, we expect to see more competition in the acquisition market, especially from private equity and foreign sovereign wealth firms. During 2011, we completed the following acquisitions:

On September 1, 2011, we acquired the remaining 51% partnership interest in the Tiburon Golf Ventures, L.P., which owns the golf club surrounding The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort, for $11 million. We previously held a 49% limited partner interest in the entity.

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% common voting interest and a preferred interest in the joint venture that owns the 364-room Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, Australia. The total transaction value, including

the 25% voting interest retained by the previous owners, was A$142 million ($152 million) and included the assumption of an existing A$80 million ($86 million) mortgage loan. We are entitled to receive a cumulative priority return of 12% based on our initial investment of A$45 million ($48 million) plus 75% of the distributable cash after our partner’s subordinated preferred interest.

On March 23, 2011 we acquired the 775-room New York Helmsley Hotel for $313.5 million. The property is managed by Starwood and will be converted to the Westin brand in 2012.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the 1,625-room Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego for $572 million (which includes the payment of $19 million for the existing FF&E replacement fund). The transaction was comprised of cash consideration of $566 million, including the repayment of $403 million of existing loans and the issuance of approximately 0.3 million OP units valued at $6 million.

On February 18, 2011, we acquired a portfolio of seven midscale and upscale hotels totaling 1,207 rooms in New Zealand for approximately NZ$190 million ($145 million), at which time we entered into an NZ$105 million ($80 million) mortgage. The properties are operated by Accor under the ibis and Novotel brands.

Also during the year, as part of the expansion of the Euro JV, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to Fund II thereof and received proceeds from the transfer of $40 million. Fund II also purchased the Pullman Bercy, Paris in 2011 for approximately €96 million ($132 million).

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Capital Expenditures. During 2011 and 2010, we invested a total of $215 million and $114 million, respectively, in redevelopment and ROI expenditures that primarily consisted of large-scale redevelopment projects at numerous properties. We expect that our investment in redevelopment and ROI expenditures in 2012 will total approximately $235 million to $275 million. Significant redevelopment capital expenditures during the year included the following projects:

Sheraton New York Hotel & Towers – the complete renovation of all 1,777 rooms, as well as major mechanical upgrades to the heating and cooling system;

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center – complete redevelopment of the hotel, including rooms renovation, lobby enhancements, mechanical systems upgrades, parking garage and exterior enhancements;

Chicago Marriott O’Hare – complete redevelopment of the hotel, including rooms renovation, new meeting space and the creation of a new great room and lobby;

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina – continuation of the extensive renovation and redevelopment project begun in 2010; and

Sheraton Indianapolis – renovation of rooms, lobby, fitness center, bar and restaurant, as well as the conversion of an existing tower into 129 apartments.

Included in our ROI expenditures are capital projects at our recently acquired hotels that we considered as part of our initial investment. In 2011, acquisition capital expenditures accounted for $13 million of our ROI capital expenditures as we began the renovation of all 270 rooms at the W New York – Union Square and the rebranding of the New York Helmsley Hotel to a Westin, including a redesign of all 773 rooms and a new lobby bar and restaurant. These projects will continue in 2012 and will include the planned renovation of all of the guestrooms at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego. During 2012, we anticipate that these projects will account for $80 million to $100 million of our ROI expenditures.

Renewal and Replacement Capital Expenditures.In addition to the redevelopment/ROI expenditures described above, we spent $327 million and $195 million on renewal and replacement expenditures during 2011 and 2010, respectively. During 2011, our renewal and replacement projects included the renovation of over 5,300 rooms, 98,000 square feet of public space and 515,000 square feet of meeting space. These expenditures are

designed to ensure that our high standards for product quality are maintained and to enhance the overall competitiveness of our properties in the marketplace. Major projects completed in 2011 included the renovation of the 45,000 square foot Broadway ballroom and 975 rooms at the New York Marriott Marquis, over 87,500 square feet of meeting space and 1,200 rooms in the main tower of the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown and 98,700 square feet of meeting space at the Sheraton Boston. Major renewal and replacement projects that were underway during the fourth quarter of 2011 included all 884 rooms at the JW Marriott Desert Springs and 39,750 square feet of meeting space at the New Orleans Marriott. We expect our investment in renewal and replacement expenditures in 2012 will total approximately $310 million to $330 million.

Dispositions. We disposed of one non-core property in 2011 for proceeds of $6 million. During 2012, we plan to increase our disposition activity, subject to market conditions that remain challenging. We believe that transaction activity will increase as the year progresses and we remain committed to our strategy of reducing our exposure to non-core hotels located in secondary and tertiary markets. We also will consider selling properties in primary markets on an opportunistic basis.

Financing Activities

During 2011, we continued to make progress in our goal to strengthen the balance sheet by lowering our debt-to-equity ratio and improving our overall credit statistics, as defined in our credit facility and senior note indentures. As our operations have improved during 2010 and 2011, we have focused on strategically raising and deploying capital to improve our overall leverage ratios, while at the same time completing substantial investments in our portfolio through acquisitions and capital investments. Specifically, during the year we completed the following significant financing transactions.

We issued $300 million of 6% Series Y senior notes and $500 million of 5 7/8% Series W senior notes for aggregate net proceeds of $784 million.

Proceeds from the senior notes issuances were used to redeem or repay $454 million of debt, including the remaining $250 million of 7 1/8% Series K senior notes, $154 million of exchangeable senior debentures and $50 million under our credit facility. Additionally, we intend to use the proceeds from the issuance of the Series Y senior notes, along with available cash, to redeem the remaining $388 million of our 2 5/8% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2007 Debentures”) on April 15, 2012, at which time they can be put to us for cash by the holders.

In June 2011, holders of $134 million of our 3 1/4% exchangeable debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) elected to exchange their debentures for 8.8 million common shares of Host Inc. upon our notice of intent to redeem $150 million of the debentures in May. The remaining $16 million was paid in cash.

We entered into a new senior revolving credit facility that replaced our existing senior revolving credit facility that allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, an increase of $400 million. The interest rate spread for LIBOR-based borrowings ranges from 175 to 275 basis points. The spread on U.S. dollar based borrowings based on our credit statistics as of December 31, 2011 is 200 basis points. The new facility has an initial maturity of November 2015 with an option to extend for one additional year, subject to certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee.

We refinanced the $79 million mortgage loan that we had assumed as part of the acquisition of the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, lowering the all-in interest rate by 400 basis points to 6.77%.

We issued 19.1 million common shares under our “at the market” offering programs. The shares were issued at an average price of $17.09 per share for net proceeds of $323 million. Proceeds from these issuances were used to fund acquisitions and capital investments.

We believe, based on the overall strength of our balance sheet, that we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital markets in order to pay our near-term debt maturities, fund our capital expenditures programs and take advantage of investment opportunities (for a detailed discussion, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

2012 Outlook

While the uncertain economic conditions and the European sovereign debt crisis will clearly impact our business, we believe that, other than in Europe, lodging demand will continue to grow based on a number of positive signs. These signs include consensus estimates for U.S. GDP growth of 2.2% in 2012, coupled with expected increases in business investment, a key driver for the lodging industry, rising corporate profit and slight improvements in employment. We believe the combination of these factors will result in solid growth in the lodging industry in 2012. As the recovery continues, we anticipate that improvements in RevPAR will be driven by increases in both rate and occupancy, though rate growth likely will be the key driver.

drive consistent demand growth. At the same time, we also anticipate that supply growth will increase compared to recent years, but will remain below historical levels for the industry overall, although growth in individual markets may vary. As a result, we anticipate solid RevPAR growth in the U.S. lodging industry during 2015. As occupancy levels at our properties in target markets and gateway cities are currently at, or near, prior peak levels, we expect that the majority of the growth will be rate driven, which should lead to improvements in our operating margins and results. We anticipate that our results will be driven by strong transient demand and improvement in group performance.   

In the near-term, we are anticipating that certain trends will negatively impact our 2015 results. Our portfolio has a large exposure to New York and Washington D.C., which represent 27% of our revenues. These markets recently have experienced above market levels of supply growth. We continue to believe that these are strong gateway markets that will drive long-term value; however, the recent supply growth is expected to cause these markets to underperform in 2015. We also expect the growth in international travel to our gateway markets to slow in 2015 due to the relative strength in the U.S. dollar and weakness in the global economy. Further, we will be completing several significant renovations at many of our largest hotels in 2015, as our redevelopment and return on investment capital expenditures are expected to more than double over 2014 levels. When operating at high occupancy, these renovations have more noticeable disruption effects. Based on these factors, we anticipate that the overall strength of the lodging industry, partially offset by short-term challenges in our portfolio, will lead to domestic year-over-year growth in RevPAR of 4.75% to 5.75%.

We expect the increase in United States lodging demand to outpace international growth. In Europe, while there are areas of growth, the overall economy remains in a tenuous position as strategies to promote overall growth compete with sovereign debt issues. Additionally, the slowdown in China’s growth and the decline in oil prices are expected to impact lodging demand in commodity driven countries such as Australia, Canada, Chile and Brazil, where we have direct investments. Difficult year-over-year comparisons, such as the World Cup in Brazil in 2014, also will weigh on RevPAR growth. As a result, we expect our RevPAR for our consolidated international portfolio to be flat to an increase of 2.0% compared to 2014 on a constant dollar basis.

For the portfolio as a whole, we anticipate that RevPAR, on a constant US$ basis, will increase 4.5% to 5.5%. However, growth in net income, operating profit and Adjusted EBITDA will be affected negatively by hotel sales and renovation disruption at several of our properties despite the growth in RevPAR. While we believe that the lodging industry will continue to remain at historically low levels in 2012 as the disruption in the credit markets and weak lodging performance caused a significant decline in new hotel construction starts over the last two years. This decline particularly may be relevant for the markets and lodging sectors in which we compete due to the long-term planning and high level of investment associated with luxury and upper upscale lodging properties in urban and resort destinations. As a result, we believe that supply growth should remain below the historical trend for the lodging industry for 2012, resulting in occupancy gains that will have a positive effect on revenues and cash flow growth.

Based on the trends discussed above and the forecast redevelopment and ROI projects, as well as other capital expenditures at our properties, we anticipate that comparable hotel RevPAR will increase 4% to 6% during 2012. We believe that the positive trends in the lodging industry create the opportunity for business improvements, which, when combined with our strategy to enhance our portfolio through acquisitions and capital projects, ultimately will improve, the competitive position of our properties and increase stockholder value. However, there can be no assurances that any increases in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties will continue for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, slower than anticipated growth in the economy, greater than anticipated disruption from renovations to our hotels and changes in travel patterns. See alsoPart I Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”


Strategic Initiatives

Portfolio

Acquisitions and Development. We continue to seek investment opportunities in our target markets, which we have identified as those that are expected over the long term to have the greatest lodging demand growth, the fewest additions to supply, and the strongest potential for revenue growth. We see increased competition for acquisitions in our target markets due to the accessibility of capital and the current availability of inexpensive financing. Consequently, pricing for upper upscale and luxury assets has become more aggressive, and recent transaction values have approached replacement cost levels, a trend we expect to continue in 2015. In 2014, we acquired one hotel in each of our target markets of San Francisco and Miami, and both hotels are managed by independent operators, as follows:

On January 21, 2014, we acquired the 151-room Powell Hotel in San Francisco, including the fee simple interest in the land, for $75 million. The property is located in the heart of downtown San Francisco, two blocks from Union Square, three blocks from the Moscone Convention Center and across from the historic cable car turnaround. The property includes a significant long-term retail lease with Sephora, a leading provider of perfume and cosmetics. The hotel, operated by Kokua Hospitality, currently is closed for renovation and will reopen in September 2015 and will be renamed the Axiom Hotel.

On August 11, 2014, we acquired the 242-room b2 miami downtown hotel for approximately $58 million. The hotel is located in Miami’s business and financial district, within walking distance of the American Airlines Arena, across from Bayfront Park and with unobstructed water views. The hotel has been renamed the YVE Hotel Miami and is being managed by Destination Hotels & Resorts.

In the fourth quarter of 2014, we opened the 149-room Novotel and 256-room ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico in Barra da Tijuca, both managed by Accor. Our total investment in the development project was R$139 million ($65 million).

Dispositions. We sold five properties in 2014 for a total sales price of $519 million, including an 89% interest of the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown. These properties are non-core assets where we believe the potential for growth is constrained or where we were able to take advantage of attractive pricing in the market. For further detail, see “–Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

During 2015, we believe the disposition market should remain favorable, including increased interest in secondary markets as a result of increased liquidity.

Capital Investment

Value Enhancement. We also look to enhance the value of our portfolio by identifying and executing strategies seeking to achieve the highest and best use of all aspects of our properties. This may include extending ground leases or restructuring management agreements, as well as developing or disposing of underutilized space connected to our properties. We believe that the successful execution of these projects will create significant value for the company. Significant value enhancement initiatives include:

In December 2014, we opened Hyatt Ka’anapali Beach, A Hyatt Residence Club, in which we hold a 67% non-controlling interest. The 131–unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii is adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. The total development cost of the project as of December 31, 2014 was approximately $180 million, of which $86 million was financed through a construction loan. In 2014, the Maui JV recognized $54 million in sales of the timeshare units.    

In collaboration with Vornado Realty Trust, on November 18, 2014, we unveiled a 25,000 square foot high-definition digital advertising display alongside the New York Marriott Marquis. The remaining redevelopment and leasing of the retail space of the hotel is scheduled to be completed by late 2015.  

We have extended the ground lease by 30 years through 2104 at the Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown and obtained flexibility with respect to lease provisions that govern the brand, operator and sub-lease provisions of the asset in return for a small increase in minimum rent. Additionally, in February 2015, we completed the purchase of the ground lease at the Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing, along with two out-parcels, for $4.6 million.

Capital Expenditures Projects. We continue to pursue opportunities to enhance asset value through select capital improvements, including projects that are designed specifically to increase the eco-efficiency of our hotels, incorporate elements of sustainable design and replace aging equipment and systems with more efficient technology.  Capital expenditures have totaled approximately $2.4 billion over the past five years and, as a result, we believe that our properties are in a strong competitive position relative to their market competitors. During 2014, we completed renovations to 4,000 guestrooms, approximately 535,000 square feet of meeting space and almost 128,000 square feet of public space.


Redevelopment, Return on Investment and Acquisition Capital Expenditures. Redevelopment and ROI projects primarily consist of large-scale redevelopment projects designed to increase cash flow and improve profitability by capitalizing on changing market conditions and the favorable location of our properties. Additionally, in conjunction with the acquisition of a property, we prepare capital and operational improvement plans designed to maximize profitability, which we refer to as Acquisition Capital Expenditures. Approximately $112 million was spent on redevelopment and return on investment projects, including acquisition capital expenditures, during 2014 compared to $133 million in 2013. Significant redevelopment and ROI capital expenditures during the year included the following projects:

o

The Fairmont Kea Lani Maui – expansion of the 9,000 square foot Willow Stream Spa;

o

Sheraton Memphis Downtown – conversion and repositioning, including the renovation of over 21,000 square feet of public space and all 600 guest rooms;

o

Sheraton New York Times Square – completion of a steam to gas conversion, where the hotel operates on its own boiler plant instead of the local utility. A similar project at the New York Marriott Marquis will be completed in the first quarter of 2015. The projects are expected to result in cost savings and decrease our carbon emissions;

o

Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego – renovation of over 100,000 square feet of meeting space and the expansion of the fitness center as part of the multi-year $84 million renovation of the hotel;

o

the renovation of six food and beverage outlets, which brings our total number of restaurant renovations to 22 over the past three years; and

o

we added over 11,000 square feet of meeting space to our portfolio in order to enhance our appeal to the higher rated corporate segment.

For 2015, we expect to spend between $245 million and $260 million for redevelopment and ROI projects, including acquisition capital expenditures. These projects for 2015 include the following:

o

The Axiom Hotel, San Francisco - In conjunction with a substantial $33 million renovation, the recently acquired Powell Hotel, located in the heart of downtown San Francisco, was closed on January 2, 2015 and will be converted to a new independent identity and renamed the Axiom Hotel. It is expected to reopen in late 2015.  

o

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina – In December 2014, the demolition of the existing conference center commenced in order to begin construction of the new $106 million Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina Exhibit Hall, which, upon completion, will provide approximately 180,000 square feet of expanded and modernized space for conferences and events.

o

Philadelphia Luxury Hotel We recently announced that we will close the Four Seasons Philadelphia in June 2015 as part of a project to convert the property to a contemporary, independent hotel operated by Sage Hospitality. The renovation will include extensive improvements to the ballroom, meeting space and spa and fitness center, while introducing a new roof-top lounge, high-end coffee bar and new restaurant concept. The hotel is expected to reopen late in 2015.

o

Houston Airport Marriott – This $53 million project includes the complete repositioning of the hotel and is expected to be completed in December 2015. Guest rooms will receive a renovation of the soft and case goods and bathroom. We will be closing two restaurants and creating a new food and beverage outlet and lobby experience.

o

Grand Hyatt Washington – We have begun a $12 million public space repositioning project. The project includes the structural reconfiguration of the lobby, retail space, restaurant space and the atrium. The project commenced in December 2014 and is expected to conclude in May 2015.

o

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center – We intend to complete an extensive guestroom renovation that involves the reconfiguration of bathrooms, all new case goods and an expansion of the current room count from 379 to 384.  The renovation will require a temporary closure of a significant portion of the guestrooms, simultaneously on multiple floors, due to the building tower structure.

We plan to complete one additional hotel renovation related to a rebranding project in 2015. Also, in early 2015, we announced that Sage Hospitality has been selected to manage the Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel pursuant to a Marriott franchise agreement. We plan to implement a transformational renovation that will include a new lobby and lounge and upgrades to the meeting space and food and beverage platforms. The renovation is expected to begin in late 2015, with the majority of the work in 2016.

Renewal and Replacement Capital Expenditures. We spent $324 million and $303 million on renewal and replacement expenditures during 2014 and 2013, respectively. These expenditures are designed to ensure that our high standards for


product quality are maintained and to enhance the overall competitiveness of our properties in the marketplace. These projects included the renovation of 3,000 rooms, 56,000 square feet of public space and 290,000 square feet of meeting space in 2014. Projects which were underway during the fourth quarter of 2014 included guestrooms at the New Orleans Marriott, The Westin Chicago River North, JW Marriott Houston, Calgary Marriott Downtown, San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk and JW Marriott Washington D.C. Major projects completed in 2014 included the following:

o

The renovation of all 532 guest rooms at the Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa, along with over 41,000 square feet of ballroom and meeting space;

o

The renovation of 428 rooms in the south tower of the Sheraton Boston Hotel, along with 5,000 square feet of restaurant and public space; and

o

The renovation of 50,000 square feet of ballroom space at the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa.

We expect that our investment in renewal and replacement expenditures in 2015 will total approximately $330 million to $350 million. In addition to completing the projects started in the fourth quarter as noted above, these expenditures will include guest room renovations at The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey, the W Seattle, and the Coronado Island Marriott Resort and Spa, and ballroom and meeting space renovations at the Santa Clara Marriott and the Manhattan Beach Marriott.

Finance

During 2014, we continued to improve our leverage ratio, as measured by the decline in our net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, and reduced our overall debt service obligations, increasing our fixed charge coverage ratio, which is calculated as EBITDA-to-fixed charges. Both of these metrics are based on calculations defined in our credit facility. We repaid approximately $760 million of debt and completed an amendment and restatement of our senior unsecured credit facility, which lowered our all-in pricing by 30 basis points on the revolver and 32.5 basis points on the term loan, and extended the maturity for both to 2019, including extensions (which are subject to meeting certain conditions). Our weighted average interest rate is 4.8% and our weighted average debt maturity is 5.2 years. We have a balanced maturity schedule wherein not more than 22% of our outstanding debt is due in any given year. Additionally, at December 31, 2014, we have approximately $796 million of available capacity under our credit facility and a debt balance of $4.0 billion.

During 2014, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.75 per share on Host Inc.’s common stock, an increase of 63% over the prior year. The declared dividends included a $0.20 regular quarterly cash dividend and a $0.06 special dividend declared during the fourth quarter of 2014. Accordingly, Host L.P. made a distribution of $0.7661205 per unit on its common OP units for 2014. On February 17, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its common stock. The dividend will be paid on April 15, 2015, to stockholders of record on March 31, 2015. The amount of any future dividend will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

There can be no assurances that any future dividends will match or exceed those set forth above for any number of reasons, including a decline in operations or an increase in liquidity needs. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital


markets in order to meet our near-term debt maturities, fund our capital expenditures programs and take advantage of investment opportunities. For a detailed discussion, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” For a detailed discussion of our significant debt activities see “Note 4.  Debt” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

International Joint Venture Investments. We continue to utilize joint ventures to expand our portfolio and to help diversify exposure to target markets internationally. During 2014, the Euro JV expanded its presence in Europe, through the acquisition of the Grand Hotel Esplanade Berlin, later repositioned as the Sheraton Berlin Grand Hotel Esplanade, and sold the Sheraton Skyline Hotel & Conference Center. For further discussion, see “- Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations.”

Results of Operations

The following table reflects certain line items from our audited statements of operations and other significant operating statistics (in millions, except operating statistics and percentages):

 

   2011  2010  % Change
2010 to  2011
  2009  % Change
2009 to  2010
 

Revenues:

      

Owned hotel revenues

  $4,745   $4,229    12.2 $4,028    5.0

Other revenues (1)

   253    199    27.1    107    86.0  

Operating costs and expenses:

      

Property-level costs (2)

   4,565    4,100    11.3    3,870    5.9  

Corporate and other expenses

   111    108    2.8    116    (6.9

Gain on insurance settlement

   2    3    (33.3  —      N/M(5

Operating profit

   324    223    45.3    149    49.7  

Interest expense

   371    384    (3.4  379    1.3  

Loss from discontinued operations

   (4  (4  —      (61  (93.4

All hotel operating statistics (3):

      

RevPAR

  $130.70   $121.46    7.6 $112.57    7.9

Average room rate

  $181.88   $173.17    5.0 $170.93    1.3

Average occupancy

   71.9  70.1  1.7pts.   65.9  4.3pts. 

Comparable hotel operating statistics (4):

      

RevPAR

  $129.97   $122.47    6.1  N/A    5.8

Average room rate

  $180.32   $172.95    4.3  N/A    0.1

Average occupancy

   72.1  70.8  1.3pts.   N/A    3.8pts. 

Host Inc.:

      

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

  $1   $2    (50)%  $6    (66.7)% 

Net loss attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

   (15  (130  88.5    (252  48.4  

Host L.P.:

      

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

  $1   $—      N/M   $1    N/M  

Net loss attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

   (15  (132  88.6  (257  48.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

Total revenues

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

$

5,059

 

 

 

2.1

%

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property-level costs (1)

 

 

4,611

 

 

 

4,533

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

4,601

 

 

 

(1.5

)

Corporate and other expenses (2)

 

 

43

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

(64.5

)

 

 

107

 

 

 

13.1

 

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

N/M

 

 

 

11

 

 

N/M

 

Operating profit

 

 

710

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

38.7

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

41.4

 

Interest expense

 

 

214

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

(29.6

)

 

 

373

 

 

 

(18.5

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

236

 

 

 

33

 

 

N/M

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

153.8

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

14

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

(33.3

)

 

 

31

 

 

 

(32.3

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

747

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

255.7

 

 

 

(8

)

 

N/M

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

N/M

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

62.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

$

15

 

 

$

8

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

$

2

 

 

 

300.0

 

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

130.9

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

419.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

$

6

 

 

$

4

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

300.0

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

130.8

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

417.7

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes the results of the 53 hotels leased from HPT in 2011, and the 71 hotels leased from HPT in 2010 and 2009, which operations we consolidated beginning July 7, 2010 as a result of the termination of the subleases with our subtenant. The line item also includes rental income earned prior to the sublease terminations.
(2)

Amounts represent total operating costs and expenses perfrom our consolidated statements of operations, less corporate and other expenses and the gain on insurance settlement.settlements.

(3)

(2)

Operating statistics are

For 2014, includes the reversal of the $69 million loss contingency and, for all properties as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, and include2013, includes an $8 million accrual, both related to the results of operationsSan Antonio Rivercenter litigation. See Legal Proceedings for hotels we have sold prior to their disposition.further details.

(4)Comparable hotel operating statistics for 2011 and 2010 are based on 104 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2011. The percent change from 2009 and 2010 are based on 108 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2010.
(5)

N/M=Not Meaningful

Hotel Sales Overview

 

   2011   2010   % Change
2010 to  2011
  2009   % Change
2009 to  2010
 
   (in millions)      (in millions)     

Revenues

         

Rooms

  $3,022    $2,661     13.6 $2,484     7.1

Food and beverage

   1,427     1,291     10.5    1,234     4.6  

Other

   296     277     6.9    310     (10.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

Owned hotel revenues

   4,745     4,229     12.2    4,028     5.0  

Other revenues

   253     199     27.1    107     86.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total revenues

  $4,998    $4,428     12.9   $4,135     7.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

2011 ComparedStatement of Operations Results and Trends

The comparisons of our hotel revenues and expenses are affected by the net results of the hotels acquired and sold during the comparable periods. Our operations for 2014 were affected by the sale of five hotels during the year, most notably the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown in January 2014, which operations prior to 2010. In 2011, hotel sales grew 12.2%sale are included in continuing operations for our owned hotels, due to strong growth in RevPAR at our properties,prior periods, as well as the inclusionresults of operations for 10 hotelsthree acquisitions: the b2 miami downtown hotel acquired in early 2011 and a full year of operations for four hotelsAugust 2014, the Powell Hotel acquired in 2010 (“Recent Acquisitions”)January 2014, and the Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach acquired in May 2013. Our 2013 operations were affected by the results of the Grand Hyatt Washington acquired in July 2012 and the Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach. In our discussion of results, we collectively refer to these transactions as our “Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions”. RevenuesDue to the adoption of a new accounting standard in 2014, the operations for properties sold in 20112014 are included in continuing operations, while revenues and expenses for eight properties sold in 2013 or 20102012 have been reclassified to discontinued operations.operations and, accordingly, are excluded from the revenues and expenses discussed in this section. See “—Critical Accounting Policies” for further discussion.


The following table presents revenues in accordance with GAAP and includes both comparable and non-comparable hotels (in millions, except percentages):

Rooms.

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,452

 

 

$

3,317

 

 

 

4.1

%

 

$

3,082

 

 

 

7.6

%

Food and beverage

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

5.9

 

Other

 

 

356

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

(38.0

)

Total revenues

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

 

2.1

 

The increaseincreases in room revenuetotal revenues in 2011 reflects our 6.1% improvement in comparable hotel RevPAR, which was2014 and 2013 of $188 million and $107 million, respectively, were driven by the 4.3% increasecontinued growth in average room rates. Rooms’ revenue increased an additional 7.9% due to incrementalrooms revenues, from our Recent Acquisitions.

Food and beverage. The increaseas well as growth in food and beverage revenue reflects an increase of 5.5%(“F&B”) and other revenues at our comparable hotels, withproperties. Our revenues were affected by the majorityresults of growth generated from our banquet and audio-visual revenue. Food and beverage revenue increased an additional 5.7% due to incremental revenues from our Recent Acquisitions.

Other. TheAcquisitions and Dispositions, which decreased total revenues by $87 million in 2014 and increased revenues by an incremental $72 million in 2013, each on a net basis. Additionally, fluctuation in currency exchange rates and the relative strength of the U.S. dollar reduced the increase in total revenues by 40 basis points in 2014. The 2012 other revenues for owned hotels in 2011 primarily is due to incremental revenues from our Recent Acquisitions. We also began to see improvement in the fourth quarter in spa and golf revenues as group business improved.

Other revenues. For 2011, the increase primarily was driven by the inclusion of a full year of revenues for the leased HPT hotels, which includes hotel revenues of $214$232 million compared to $123 million of hotel revenues and $44 million of rental income recorded in 2010. On July 7, 2010, in connection with the termination of subleases for 71 hotels leased from HPT, we began recording the operations of the hotels instead of rental income. OnHospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”). These leases were terminated on December 30, 2011, we entered into a settlement with our subtenant related to the termination of the subleases, which resulted31, 2012.  

Rooms. Rooms revenues increased $135 million and $235 million in an additional $7 million of income being recorded in 2011 to compensate us for a portion of our losses subsequent to the sublease termination.

While management evaluates the performance of each individual hotel against its competitive set in a given market, overall we evaluate the portfolio operating results using three different criteria: property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), geographic region2014 and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract).

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type. The following tables set forth performance information for 2011 and 2010:

Comparable Hotels Portfolio by Property Type (a)

   As of December 31, 2011   Year ended December 31, 2011   Year ended December 31, 2010     
   No. of
Properties
   No. of
Rooms
   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Percent
Change in
RevPAR
 

Urban

   50     32,282    $194.40     73.7 $143.33    $186.87     73.2 $136.76     4.8

Suburban

   28     10,564     145.56     67.9    98.77     139.45     66.0    91.98     7.4  

Resort/Conference

   13     8,082     215.19     67.5    145.24     204.83     65.3    133.76     8.6  

Airport

   13     6,275     122.85     76.6    94.09     116.03     73.9    85.73     9.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

All Types

   104     57,203     180.32     72.1    129.97     172.95     70.8    122.47     6.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

(a)The reporting period for 2011 is from January 1, 2011 to December 30, 2011 and for 2010 is from January 2, 2010 to December 31, 2010 for our Marriott hotels. For further discussion, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics—Reporting Periods.”

During 2011, comparable hotel RevPAR increased across all of our hotel property types. Our airport properties led the portfolio with a 9.7% increase for the year, driven by an improvement in average room rates of 5.9%, as well as strength at our San Francisco airport hotels. Our resort/conference hotels also experienced a significant RevPAR increase of 8.6%, led by our Hawaiian properties. Our urban properties lagged the portfolio as a whole, with a RevPAR increase of 4.8%. Strong performance in our west coast urban markets, particularly San Francisco and San Diego, was offset by renovation disruption at the Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers and Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, as well as weak overall demand in our Washington, D.C. and Atlanta urban markets. RevPAR improved at our suburban hotels by 7.4% for the year, driven by an increase in rate of 4.4% and an increase in occupancy of 1.9 percentage points.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Region. The following tables set forth performance information for 2011 and 2010:

Comparable Hotels by Region (a)

   As of December 31, 2011   Year ended December 31, 2011   Year ended December 31, 2010     
   No. of
Properties
   No. of
Rooms
   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Percent
Change in
RevPAR
 

Pacific

   26     14,581    $172.15     75.4 $129.74    $161.38     71.6 $115.55     12.3

Mid-Atlantic

   10     8,352     241.47     77.9    188.17     225.63     79.9    180.38     4.3  

South Central

   9     5,687     147.86     68.6    101.36     142.83     67.1    95.80     5.8  

Florida

   9     5,677     183.14     69.7    127.71     178.23     68.7    122.37     4.4  

DC Metro

   12     5,416     194.48     74.0    143.90     191.55     74.0    141.83     1.5  

North Central

   10     4,358     145.00     70.6    102.33     139.68     69.0    96.39     6.2  

New England

   7     3,924     171.39     71.3    122.28     172.19     69.6    119.83     2.1  

Atlanta

   7     3,846     157.31     65.0    102.32     156.55     64.5    101.00     1.3  

Mountain

   7     2,889     157.90     65.0    102.59     149.32     63.2    94.30     8.8  

International

   7     2,473     170.64     65.3    111.46     157.91     65.7    103.80     7.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

All Regions

   104     57,203     180.32     72.1    129.97     172.95     70.8    122.47     6.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

(a)The reporting period for 2011 is from January 1, 2011 to December 30, 2011 and for 2010 is from January 2, 2010 to December 31, 2010 for our Marriott hotels. For further discussion, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics—Reporting Periods.”

For 2011, comparable hotel RevPAR improved across all of our geographic regions when compared to 2010. Our Pacific region was the top performing region, with a RevPAR increase of 12.3% that was driven by strong group and transient demand in our Hawaiian, San Diego and San Francisco markets.

The 8.8% RevPAR improvement in our Mountain region was driven primarily by strong growth in the Phoenix market, which increased by 13.3% for 2011. The increase in the Phoenix market was a result of strong group demand, aided by the construction of a new ballroom and meeting space at the Westin Kierland in 2010, as well as increases in both group and transient rates.

The North Central region had2013, respectively, reflecting an increase in RevPAR of 6.2%5.3% and 5.6%, ledrespectively, at our comparable hotels, as well as RevPAR improvements for recently renovated properties that are not included in our comparable results. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $53 million decline in revenues due to Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2014, and an increase of $51 million in 2013, on a net basis.

Food and beverage. F&B revenues increased $43 million and $84 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. For our comparable hotels, F&B revenues increased 3.8% and 4.0%, respectively, for 2014 and 2013, driven by our Chicago market, which hadgrowth in banquet, audio visual revenues and outlet revenue. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $28 million decline in revenues due to Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2014 and an increase of $20 million in 2013, on a net basis.

Other revenues. Other revenues increased $10 million in 2014 primarily due to increases in both transientparking and group demand, resulting in RevPAR growthlease income. In 2013, other revenues decreased $212 million. Excluding the effects of 6.9%.

RevPAR in our South Central region grew 5.8% for the year, driven mainly by our Houston market, which saw strong increases in rate of 5.5% and occupancy of 3.5 percentage pointsterminated HPT leases, other revenues increased $20 million, primarily due to lease revenue at the New York Marriott Marquis as a result of an increase inthe retail development agreement with Vornado Realty Trust and corporate transient demand.

Results in our Florida region were mixed. The Miami and Ft. Lauderdale market experienced a 7.3 percentage points improvement in occupancy, primarily due to strong group demand, aided by the renovation of the Miami Biscayne Bay Marriott, which was completed in 2010. RevPAR growth at our Orlando World Center Marriott had an increase of just 1%, due to lower than expected group demand.

The RevPAR growth in our Mid-Atlantic region of 4.3% lagged the portfolio as a whole due to lower levels of rate growth and the effect of new supply in the New York market, as well as significant renovations at the Sheraton New York Hotel & Towers and the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown.

Our DC Metro and Atlanta regions underperformed the portfolio as a whole, with RevPAR growth of 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively. For our DC Metro market, weak group and transient demand, along with discounted leisure rates, slowed rate growth. Our Atlanta market was negatively affected by the decline in city-wide demand, as well as renovations at the JW Marriott, Buckhead, particularly in the second half of 2011.

Hotel Sales by Business Mix. The majority of our customers fall into three broad groups: transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix data for 104 of our hotels for which information is available from our managers.

In 2011, overall transient revenues increased 6.9% when compared to 2010, reflecting a 4.6% improvement in average rate and a 2.2% increase in room nights. Average daily rates improved consistently for all transient segments. The improvement in transient demand was driven by increases in special corporate room nights.

During 2011, group revenues increased approximately 5.3%. Average daily rates improved 3.4%, reflecting a consistent rate growth for all group customer segments. Overall, group demand improved 1.7% for the year. The improvement was due entirely to an increase in demand in the corporate group segment, as association and other group business declined during 2011.

2010 Compared to 2009. In 2010, hotel sales grew 5.0% for our owned hotels, reflecting strong growth in RevPAR at our properties, as well as increases in food and beverage revenues, partially offset by a decline in attrition and cancellation fees. Revenues for properties sold in 2010 or 2009 have been reclassified to discontinued operations.

Rooms.The increase in room revenue in 2010 was consistent with the overall increase in RevPAR, primarily due to occupancy gains at our hotels. While the majority of the increase is due to the 5.8% increase in RevPAR at our comparable hotels, there also was a 1.7% increase related to the revenues recorded at the hotels acquired during the year.

Food and beverage. The increase in food and beverage revenue in 2010 primarily was attributable to increased occupancy, which contributes to greater demand for catering and banquet business.

Other. The decrease in other revenues for owned hotels in 2010 is primarily a result of a decline in attrition and cancellation fees of approximately $37 million.

Other revenues. For 2010, the increase primarily was driven by the inclusion of theand parking revenue. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $6 million decline in revenues for the leased HPT hotels. For 2010, revenues for hotels leased from HPT include hotel revenues of $123 million and rental income of $44 million. For 2009, revenues for hotels leased from HPT include rental income of $79 million. The property revenues and rental income recorded, less the hotel expenses and rental expenses for the HPT properties, resulted in net losses of $13 million and $1 million for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

While management evaluates the performance of each individual hotel against its competitive set in a given market, overall we evaluate the portfolio operating results using three different criteria: property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), geographic region and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract).

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type. The following tables set forth performance information for 2010 and 2009:

Comparable Hotels Portfolio by Property Type (a)

   As of December 31, 2010   Year ended December 31, 2010   Year ended December 31, 2009     
   No. of
Properties
   No. of
Rooms
   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Percent
Change in
RevPAR
 

Urban

   52     33,123    $185.53     72.5 $134.50    $182.59     69.0 $125.90     6.8

Suburban

   29     10,964     138.29     65.6    90.73     139.71     61.1    85.32     6.3  

Resort/Conference

   13     8,082     204.83     65.3    133.76     215.19     61.1    131.57     1.7  

Airport

   14     6,956     115.98     71.8    83.30     115.61     68.5    79.18     5.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

All Types

   108     59,125     171.43     70.2    120.26     171.25     66.4    113.66     5.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

(a)The reporting period for 2010 is from January 2, 2010 to December 31, 2010 and for 2009 is from January 3, 2009 to January 1, 2010 for our Marriott hotels. For further discussion, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics—Reporting Periods.”

During 2010, comparable hotel RevPAR increased across all of our hotel property types. Our urban properties led the portfolio, with a 6.8% increase in RevPAR for the year. The continued improvement in demand has allowed our operators to begin to increase the average room rates at our urban properties, which improved 1.6% overall for the year. Our suburban properties also experienced a significant RevPAR increase in 2010, driven by strength in the suburban Boston, Orange County and San Francisco markets. Our resort/conference hotels lagged the portfolio as a whole, as the 7.9% improvement in RevPAR at our resort/conference properties in our Florida region were partially offset by the RevPAR declines in the Phoenix and Palm Springs markets. RevPAR at our Airport properties improved 5.2% for the year, driven by strong demand growth in the Chicago and San Francisco airport markets.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Region. The following tables set forth performance information for 2010 and 2009:

Comparable Hotels by Region (a)

   As of December 31, 2010   Year ended December 31, 2010   Year ended December 31, 2009     
   No. of
Properties
   No. of
Rooms
   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Average
Room Rate
   Average
Occupancy
Percentages
  RevPAR   Percent
Change in
RevPAR
 

Pacific

   26     14,581    $161.38     71.6 $115.55    $166.08     67.1 $111.38     3.7

Mid-Atlantic

   10     8,328     225.63     79.9    180.38     219.22     76.4    167.47     7.7  

North Central

   13     5,897     133.87     63.9    85.52     130.80     61.8    80.85     5.8  

South Central

   9     5,687     142.83     67.1    95.80     143.88     63.8    91.83     4.3  

Florida

   9     5,677     178.23     68.7    122.37     182.88     62.9    115.04     6.4  

DC Metro

   12     5,416     191.55     74.0    141.83     190.52     73.6    140.13     1.2  

Atlanta

   8     4,253     152.04     63.8    96.94     152.32     58.2    88.63     9.4  

New England

   7     3,924     172.19     69.6    119.83     165.77     65.2    108.10     10.8  

Mountain

   7     2,889     149.32     63.2    94.30     157.85     59.4    93.69     0.7  

International

   7     2,473     157.91     65.7    103.80     143.29     61.6    88.21     17.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

All Regions

   108     59,125     171.43     70.2    120.26     171.25     66.4    113.66     5.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

             

(a)The reporting period for 2010 is from January 2, 2010 to December 31, 2010 and for 2009 is from January 3, 2009 to January 1, 2010 for our Marriott hotels. For further discussion, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics—Reporting Periods.”

For 2010, comparable hotel RevPAR improved across all of our geographic regions when compared to 2009. Our New England region was the top performing U.S. region, with RevPAR growth of 10.8%, driven by RevPAR growth of 11.6% in the Boston market. This increase was due to strong groupRecent Acquisitions and transient demand, as occupancy increased 5.0 percentage points and average room rates increased 3.9%.

The 9.4% RevPAR growthDispositions in our Atlanta region was driven primarily by strong city-wide and transient business in the fourth quarter. Strong demand from both group and transient customers drove a 9.0 percentage point occupancy increase in the fourth quarter.

RevPAR in our Mid-Atlantic region grew 7.7% for the year, driven by RevPAR growth at our New York properties of 9.5%. For our New York properties, rate improved 5.7% and occupancy improved by 3.0 percentage points.

Our Florida region had an increase in RevPAR of 6.4% for the year, led by strong performance at our resort/conference hotels in this region. RevPAR at our Florida resort/conference hotels increased 7.9% for the year, driven primarily by an increase in occupancy of 6.6 percentage points; however, this increase was affected by lower group demand as well as significant renovations at the Orlando World Center Marriott Resort and Convention Center in the fourth quarter.

The RevPAR increase for the year in our North Central region was driven by our Chicago hotels, as RevPAR increased 8.8% due to strong transient demand and rate increased 2.6%.

Results in our Mountain region were mixed, as the Denver market experienced a 7.9% increase in RevPAR primarily due to strong group and transient demand, while the Phoenix market experienced a 3.9% decline in RevPAR, which was partially attributable to the renovation of a significant amount of meeting space at two hotels and the construction of a new ballroom at the Westin Kierland.

Our DC Metro region underperformed the portfolio in terms of RevPAR growth, which underperformance reflects difficult comparisons to the prior year, particularly during the first quarter, due to the 2009 presidential inauguration and other government-related activities.

Hotel Sales by Business Mix. The majority of our customers fall into three broad groups: transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix data for 108 of our hotels for which information is available from our managers.

In 2010, overall transient revenues increased 7.6% when compared to 2009, reflecting an increase in total room nights of 4.9%,2014, and an increase of $2 million in average rates of 2.6%. The rate increase was driven primarily by2013, on a 5.0% increase in average rate for corporate transient business and a shift in mix away from discounted business.net basis.

During 2010, group revenues increased approximately 3.5%, reflecting an increase in total room nights of 6.7%, partially offset by a decrease in average rates of 3.0%. Typically, recovery in the group segment will follow improvement in transient demand due to longer booking lead times. As a result, a large portion of the 2010 group business was sold at the lower rates in effect in prior periods. Therefore, while we did experience improvements in group demand, improvements in overall group revenue continues to lag that of transient revenue.

Property-level Operating Expenses

The following table presents consolidated property-level operating expenses in accordance with GAAP and includes both comparable and non-comparable hotels (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

Change

 

  2011   2010   % Change
2011 to  2010
 2009   % Change
2010 to 2009
 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

  (in millions)     (in millions)     

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

  $832    $734     13.4 $681     7.8

 

$

924

 

 

$

894

 

 

 

3.4

%

 

$

836

 

 

 

6.9

%

Food and beverage

   1,062     965     10.1    933     3.4  

 

 

1,109

 

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

1,049

 

 

 

4.4

 

Other departmental and support expenses

   1,261     1,151     9.6    1,099     4.7  

 

 

1,264

 

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

2.5

 

Management fees

   189     171     10.5    158     8.2  

 

 

227

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

11.6

 

Other property-level expenses

   569     488     16.6    386     26.4  

 

 

386

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

(34.7

)

Depreciation and amortization

   652     591     10.3    613     (3.6

 

 

701

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

(3.5

)

  

 

   

 

    

 

   

Total property-level operating expenses

  $4,565    $4,100     11.3   $3,870     5.9  

 

$

4,611

 

 

$

4,533

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

$

4,601

 

 

 

(1.5

)

  

 

   

 

    

 

   

2011 compared to 2010 and 2010 compared to 2009.Our operating costs and expenses, bothwhich consist of which areboth fixed and variable components, are affected by a number of factors. As previously discussed, roomRoom expense is affected mainly by occupancy, which drives costs related to items such as housekeeping, reservation systems, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Food and beverage expense correlates closely with food and beverage revenues, and is affected by occupancy as well asand the typemix of customers staying at the hotel.business between banquet and audio-visual and outlet sales. However, the most significant expense for both room expense and food and beverage expense is related to wages and employee benefits, which comprise


approximately 55% of these expenses in any year. Other property-level expenses consist of property taxes, which are highly dependent on local jurisdiction taxing authorities, and property and general liability insurance, and do not necessarily change based on changes in revenues at our hotels. The overall increases in operating expenses in 20112014 and 2010in 2013, excluding the 2012 expenses related to the expired HPT leases, are consistent with higher overall RevPARrevenues at our properties and increasesproperties. Changes in occupancy andforeign currency exchange rates atreduced the increase in property-level expenses by 30 basis points. The year-over-year changes also reflect the effects of our hotels. The increase also is a result of the inclusion of expenses for Recent Acquisitions which were $295and Dispositions, as discussed below.

Rooms. Room expenses increased $30 million and $45$58 million in 2011during 2014 and 2010, respectively. Property-level operating expenses exclude the costs associated with hotels we have sold during the periods presented, which costs are included in discontinued operations.

Rooms.The2013, respectively, reflecting an increase in rooms expenses reflects a 5.7% increase in expensesof 4.8% and 5.1%, respectively, at our comparable hotels, due primarily todriven by increases in wages and benefits, higher wages, benefits, travel agent commissions and reservationslaundry and guest supply costs. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $14 million decline in expenses due to Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2014, and an increase of $12 million in 2013, on a net basis.

Food and beverage. The increase in F&B expenses of $14 million in 2014 and $46 million in 2013 reflect year-over-year increases of 2.6% and 2.7% in comparable F&B expenses, respectively, as well as the effect of the timing of our Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions. The limited increase reflects continued improvements in occupancy duringF&B hourly productivity which has led to declines in F&B costs as a percentage of revenues in 2014 and 2013. Additionally, much of the year. Rooms expenserevenue improvements were driven by increases in banquet and audio visual revenues, which have higher overall operating margins than outlet revenue. Year-over-year comparisons also increased 8.0%reflect a $21 million decline in expenses due to the inclusionRecent Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2014, and an increase of an incremental $59$13 million in expenses from our Recent Acquisitions. The increase in rooms expenses in 2010 was consistent with the overall increase in occupancy during the year and higher wage costs.2013, on a net basis.

FoodOther departmental and beveragesupport expenses. The increaseOther departmental and support expenses increased $15 million and $30 million in food2014 and beverage expenses at our hotels reflects a 4.8% increase at our comparable hotels2013, respectively, primarily due to increases in foodcredit card fees, wages and beverage business, however, the overall productivity for the department improved. Foodbenefits, and beverage expense also increased 5.6% due to the inclusion of an incremental $54 million in expenses from our Recent Acquisitions. The increase in food and beverage costs in 2010 reflects the increase in revenues, partially offset by the positive shift in the mix of business to more catering and audio visual revenues. However, for 2010, weak productivity in banquet sales hurt overall profitability.

Other departmental and support expenses. The increase in other departmental and support expenses in 2011 resulted from the Recent Acquisitions, along with increases in sales and marketing costs. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $21 million decline in expenses due to Recent Acquisitions and administrative expenses. The increaseDispositions in revenues drove2014, and an increase of $13 million in non-controllable hotel expenses during 2010, such as credit card commissions, bonus expense, loyalty rewards program expenses and cluster and shared service allocations.2013, on a net basis.

Management fees. Our base managementfees. Management fees, which generally are calculated as a percentage of total revenues and operating profit, increased 9.8%2.3% to $227 million for 20112014 and 3.9% in 2010, which is a result of the increase in revenues at our comparable hotels, as well as the inclusion of11.6% to $222 million for 2013. Base management fees for our comparable hotels, which are calculated as a percentage of total revenues, increased $8 million and $6 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, due to the overall increase in our hotel revenues, including the effects of our Recent Acquisitions. TheAcquisitions and Dispositions. For 2014, incentive management fees at our comparable properties declined 4.1%, reflecting the renegotiation of management agreements at three of our properties and declines at specific properties, which are based onoffset increases due to the level ofoverall improvement in operating profit at each property afterthat resulted in more properties incurring incentive management fees. For 2013, the owner has received a priority return on its investment, increased 16.0% in 2011 and 17.5% in 2010, consistentincrease is commensurate with the increase in operating profit at those properties earning the incentive fees.profit. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a $2 million decline in expenses from Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2014 and an increase of $5 million in 2013, on a net basis.

Other property-level expenses. These expenses generally do not vary significantly based on occupancy and include expenses such as property taxes and insurance. In 2014, other property-level expenses increased $10 million, or 2.7%.For 20112014, other property-level expenses at our comparable hotels increased 3.6%, as a 3.4% increase in property taxes was substantially offset by a decline in property insurance, as well as a decrease of $4 million due to incremental expenses from our Recent Acquisitions and 2010,Dispositions. For 2013, expenses decreased $200 million, or 34.7%, due to the increase was driven primarily by the inclusionexpiration of the HPT hotelleases on December 31, 2012.  Excluding the effects of the HPT leases, other property-level expenses discussed below.

For 2011, expenses for hotels leased from HPT include rental expense of $68increased $34 million, or 10%, in 2013 due to an increase in real estate taxes, as well as $5 million due to HPT, as well as $159incremental expenses from our Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions, on a net basis.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4 million, of hotel expenses.or 0.6%, to $701 million in 2014 due to capital expenditures, partially offset by a decrease due to Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions. For 2010, expenses for hotels leased from HPT include rental2013, depreciation and amortization expense of $84decreased $25 million, or 3.5%, to $697 million, due to HPT, as well as the $96a decline in non-cash impairment expenses of $59 million, of hotel expenses incurred subsequent to the sublease termination. For 2009, expenses for hotels leased from HPT represent rental expensepartially offset by an increase due to HPT of $80 million.

DepreciationRecent Acquisitions and amortization. The increase in depreciation expense in 2011 is due to the inclusion of depreciation expense for newly acquired propertiesDispositions and recent capital expenditures. The decline in depreciation expense in 2010 is due to impairment charges of approximately $20 million recorded in 2009.

Other Income Statement Line Itemsand Expense

Corporate and Other Expenses.other expenses. Corporate and other expenses include the following items (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

General and administrative cost

 

$

82

 

 

$

87

 

 

$

83

 

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

 

 

22

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

16

 

Litigation (recoveries) accruals and acquisition costs, net

 

 

(61

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

8

 

Total corporate and other expenses

 

$

43

 

 

$

121

 

 

$

107

 


General and administrative costs primarily consist of employee salarieswages and bonuses and other costs, such as employee stock-based compensation expense,benefits, travel, corporate insurance, legal fees, acquisition-related costs, audit fees, building rent and systems costs. Corporate expenses increased approximately $3 millionThe increases in 2011 due to the $15 million loss on the forfeited deposit for the Grand Hyatt Washington, D.C. transaction and the accrual of $5 million of additional litigation costs, which was largely offset by the decline in employee stock compensation. The stock based compensation is based on employee performance, as well as Host Inc.’s stockholder return relative to other REITs and to other lodging companies and will vary significantly due to fluctuations in Host Inc.’s stock price.

Corporate expenses decreased $8 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease primarily was due to litigation costs of $41 million accrued in 2009 for a potential litigation loss. The decrease was offset partially by an increase innon-cash stock-based compensation expense reflect the increase in our stock price in both 2014 and bonus2013. Litigation (recoveries) accruals as they returnedand acquisition costs in 2014 include the previously disclosed reversal of the $69 million loss contingency related to more normalized levels in 2010, and an increasethe successful resolution of the litigation related to the ground lease for San Antonio.

Gain on insurance settlements. We recorded a gain of $10 million duein 2014 related to costs associated with consummated property acquisitions.

Gain on Insurance Settlement.During 2011,the receipt of insurance proceeds for several of our properties in New York and Washington, D.C. which were affected by Hurricane Sandy in October 2012. In 2012, we recorded a gain of $2$11 million related to the receipt of business interruption insurance proceeds for our two properties in Christchurch, New Zealand, both of which were affected by an earthquake in February 2011. The two properties were damaged substantially2011 and remain closed. We believe the property damage is covered under our insurance policy. We recorded a gain on insurance settlement of $3$2 million in 2010 for business interruption insurance related to ourproperty insurance for two hotels in Chile, both of which were affected by thean earthquake in JulyFebruary 2010.

Interest Expense.income. Interest income in both 2014 and 2013 was $4 million. The decrease in interest expense during 2011 is2013 of approximately $19 million was due primarily to a decrease in coststhe 2012 maturity of the mortgage loan investment associated with the portfolio of five hotels acquired by the Euro JV in November 2012.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $90 million, or 29.6%, in 2014 as compared to 2013, and decreased $69 million, or 18.5%, in 2013, primarily due to the repayment or refinancing of debt, extinguishments (including the acceleration of deferred financingwhich lowered our full year weighted average interest rates and overall debt balance. Additionally, total debt extinguishment costs and original issue discounts), which totaled $9decreased $32 million in 2011, compared to $212014 and increased $6 million in 2010. After adjusting for debt extinguishment, interest expense was comparable to 2010 levels. In addition, savings2013. Savings from theour fixed-to-floating interest rate swap, thatwhich swap matured in March 2014, reduced interest expense by $2 million, $7 million and $6 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The following table presents certain components of interest expense (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31, (1)

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash interest expense(1)

 

$

186

 

 

$

239

 

 

$

308

 

Cash incremental interest expense (1)(2)

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

Non-cash interest expense

 

 

24

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

30

 

Cash debt extinguishment costs(1)

 

 

2

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

21

 

Non-cash debt extinguishment costs

 

 

2

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

9

 

Total interest expense

 

$

214

 

 

$

304

 

 

$

373

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Total cash interest expense paid was $189 million, $282 million, and $338 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which includes an increase due to the change in accrued interest of $1 million, $16 million and $4 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(2)

Incremental interest expense reflects the cash interest expense for refinanced debt subsequent to the issuance of the new financing and prior to the repayment of the refinanced debt.

Gain (loss) on sale of assets. During 2014, we entered intorecognized a $111 million gain on the sale of an 89% interest in the second halfPhiladelphia Marriott Downtown, a gain of 2009 for our $300$115 million mortgage on the sale of the Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina and a $3 million gain on the sale of Greensboro-High Point Marriott Airport. Additionally, due to the completion of earnings requirements, we recognized deferred gains totaling $6 million related to the sale of The Ritz-Carlton, NaplesSan Francisco and land contributed to the Maui JV. The gain (loss) on sale of assets in 2013 includes the $21 million gain on the sale of land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa reduced interest expenseand the recognition of a previously deferred $11 million gain related to an eminent domain claim by $6the State of Georgia of 2.9 acres of land for the highway expansion at the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center.  The gain (loss) on sale of assets in 2012 includes the $8 million for 2011 and 2010 and $1 million in 2009.

The increase in interest expense during 2010 from 2009 is due primarily to costs associated with debt extinguishments totaling $21 million, compared to a net gain of $9 million on debt extinguishments in 2009. This increase was offset partially by a net decrease in our overall debt balance, which resulted in interest savings of approximately $23 million.

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates.The increase in earnings of affiliates during 2011 primarily is duerelated to the inclusioncontribution of land to the operationsMaui JV. The 2013 and 2012 gain (loss) on sales of the Le Méridien Piccadilly and the Pullman Paris Bercyhotel properties are classified in Fund II of the Euro JV and also reflects a 5.5% growth in RevPAR at the comparable hotels within the joint venture due to rate improvements. In 2009, we determined that the carrying value of our investment in the Euro JV exceeded its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $34 million, which significantly decreased equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates for 2009, particularly when compared to 2011 and 2010.discontinued operations.

Benefit (provision) for Income Taxes.income taxes. We lease substantially all of our properties to consolidated subsidiaries designated as TRS for federal income tax purposes. The difference between hotel-level operating cash flow and the aggregate rent paid to Host L.P. by the TRS represents taxable income or loss, on which we record an income tax provision or benefit. The decrease in the tax benefitprovision in each2014 and 2013 from the prior year reflects a decrease in taxable income at the TRS due to an increase in rent expense in excess of 2011the increase in operating profit from the hotels and 2010 reflects year-over-year improvements in property operations recognized by our TRS, as well as increases ina reduction of certain foreign taxes in 2011.taxes.


Income (loss) from discontinued operations.Discontinued Operations. Discontinued operations consist of one hotel disposed of in 2011, twofive hotels disposed of in 20102013 and sixthree hotels disposed of in 20092012 and representrepresents the results of operations and the gains or losses on the disposition of these hotels during the indicated periods. The following table summarizes the revenues, lossincome before taxes, and the gain (loss) on dispositions,disposals, net of tax, of the hotels which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, which includes assets held for sale and the results of sold hotels prior to their disposition for the periods presented (in millions):

 

   2011  2010  2009 

Revenues

  $5   $14   $81  

Loss before taxes

   (4  (3  (88

Gain (loss) on dispositions, net of tax

   —      (2  26  

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Revenues

 

$

104

 

 

$

264

 

Income before taxes

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

Gain on disposals, net of tax

 

 

97

 

 

 

48

 

Comparable Hotel Sales Overview

While management evaluates the performance of each individual hotel against its competitive set in a given market, we evaluate our overall portfolio operating results using three different criteria: geographic market, property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract). As of December 31, 2014, 106 of our 114 owned hotels have been classified as comparable hotels. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” for a complete description of our comparable hotels.


2014 Compared to 2013

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic market as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,432

 

 

$

213.85

 

 

 

77.2

%

 

$

165.05

 

 

$

198.31

 

 

 

79.3

%

 

$

157.20

 

 

 

5.0

%

New York

 

 

9

 

 

 

7,224

 

 

 

286.93

 

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

249.86

 

 

 

278.77

 

 

 

86.8

 

 

 

241.86

 

 

 

3.3

 

Philadelphia

 

 

2

 

 

 

776

 

 

 

211.57

 

 

 

78.0

 

 

 

165.04

 

 

 

208.26

 

 

 

74.9

 

 

 

156.05

 

 

 

5.8

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

12

 

 

 

6,016

 

 

 

201.94

 

 

 

76.7

 

 

 

154.96

 

 

 

202.69

 

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

152.09

 

 

 

1.9

 

Atlanta

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,280

 

 

 

172.85

 

 

 

73.9

 

 

 

127.82

 

 

 

164.58

 

 

 

73.3

 

 

 

120.57

 

 

 

6.0

 

Florida

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,511

 

 

 

218.49

 

 

 

78.0

 

 

 

170.47

 

 

 

207.93

 

 

 

75.6

 

 

 

157.12

 

 

 

8.5

 

Chicago

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,857

 

 

 

186.60

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

139.02

 

 

 

183.98

 

 

 

73.6

 

 

 

135.36

 

 

 

2.7

 

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

152.42

 

 

 

67.3

 

 

 

102.54

 

 

 

144.17

 

 

 

63.9

 

 

 

92.18

 

 

 

11.2

 

Houston

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

190.63

 

 

 

73.4

 

 

 

139.96

 

 

 

181.26

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

138.75

 

 

 

0.9

 

Phoenix

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

196.63

 

 

 

71.3

 

 

 

140.19

 

 

 

188.53

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

128.65

 

 

 

9.0

 

Seattle

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,774

 

 

 

188.57

 

 

 

78.8

 

 

 

148.62

 

 

 

168.60

 

 

 

78.1

 

 

 

131.71

 

 

 

12.8

 

San Francisco

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,701

 

 

 

224.15

 

 

 

82.4

 

 

 

184.78

 

 

 

199.66

 

 

 

80.3

 

 

 

160.41

 

 

 

15.2

 

Los Angeles

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,228

 

 

 

177.43

 

 

 

80.6

 

 

 

143.01

 

 

 

162.93

 

 

 

81.7

 

 

 

133.11

 

 

 

7.4

 

San Diego

 

 

5

 

 

 

4,691

 

 

 

193.17

 

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

154.54

 

 

 

186.14

 

 

 

78.2

 

 

 

145.59

 

 

 

6.1

 

Hawaii

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,256

 

 

 

378.37

 

 

 

81.7

 

 

 

309.29

 

 

 

353.41

 

 

 

82.0

 

 

 

289.89

 

 

 

6.7

 

Other

 

 

11

 

 

 

7,231

 

 

 

161.23

 

 

 

66.9

 

 

 

107.94

 

 

 

157.39

 

 

 

67.3

 

 

 

105.94

 

 

 

1.9

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,568

 

 

 

211.82

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

163.73

 

 

 

202.55

 

 

 

76.7

 

 

 

155.27

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

7

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

$

153.62

 

 

 

82.9

%

 

$

127.37

 

 

$

148.69

 

 

 

81.1

%

 

$

120.63

 

 

 

5.6

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

180.08

 

 

 

66.6

 

 

 

119.92

 

 

 

171.37

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

118.06

 

 

 

1.6

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

257.33

 

 

 

68.3

 

 

 

175.82

 

 

 

217.40

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

142.55

 

 

 

23.3

 

International

 

 

14

 

 

 

3,684

 

 

 

189.58

 

 

 

73.3

 

 

 

138.98

 

 

 

173.79

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

126.14

 

 

 

10.2

 

All Markets -

     Constant US$

 

 

106

 

 

 

55,252

 

 

 

210.40

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

162.07

 

 

 

200.72

 

 

 

76.4

 

 

 

153.32

 

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

7

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

$

153.62

 

 

 

82.9

%

 

$

127.37

 

 

$

152.79

 

 

 

81.1

%

 

$

123.95

 

 

 

2.8

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

180.08

 

 

 

66.6

 

 

 

119.92

 

 

 

183.53

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

126.43

 

 

 

(5.1

)

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

257.33

 

 

 

68.3

 

 

 

175.82

 

 

 

238.71

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

156.52

 

 

 

12.3

 

International

 

 

14

 

 

 

3,684

 

 

 

189.58

 

 

 

73.3

 

 

 

138.98

 

 

 

184.92

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

134.22

 

 

 

3.5

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,568

 

 

 

211.82

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

163.73

 

 

 

202.55

 

 

 

76.7

 

 

 

155.27

 

 

 

5.4

 

All Markets -

     Nominal US$

 

 

106

 

 

 

55,252

 

 

 

210.40

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

162.07

 

 

 

201.43

 

 

 

76.4

 

 

 

153.86

 

 

 

5.3

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

RevPAR improvements were led by properties in our west coast markets, including San Francisco and Seattle, where comparable RevPAR increased 15.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Both markets benefited from already high levels of demand and solid group business, allowing for significant rate improvements for both group and transient business. Our hotels in these markets also benefited from post-renovation improvements.


Additionally, our Los Angeles and San Diego markets experienced a 7.4% and 6.1% growth in RevPAR, respectively. The Los Angeles RevPAR growth was driven by an 8.9% improvement in rate, the result of strong group and transient demand which allowed for a reduction in discounted room nights. The RevPAR growth at our San Diego hotels was due to a combination of rate growth of 3.8% and an increase in occupancy of 1.8 percentage points. Steady transient demand at these hotels led to a favorable business mix shift to higher-rated transient segments. With average occupancy over 80% for full year 2014, our Hawaii hotels experienced a 7.1% increase in average rate, as the business mix shifted to higher-rated leisure travelers, including customers previewing the new timeshare project adjacent to the Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa.

In comparison, our east coast properties lagged the portfolio, primarily reflecting results in New York and Washington, D.C., where recent new supply has limited RevPAR growth to 3.3% and 1.9%, respectively. Our Boston market generally was in-line with the portfolio, with RevPAR improvement of 5.0%. This improvement reflected an increase in rate of 7.8%, offset by a decrease in occupancy of 2.1 percentage points, partially due to less favorable comparisons due to the World Series events in 2013. Our Florida market outperformed for the year, with an increase in comparable RevPAR of 8.5% compared to 2013 due to the combination of an increase in average room rate of 5.1% and an increase in occupancy of 2.5 percentage points, as our resort properties performed well, benefiting from an increase in both transient and group business.

Our Central markets were led by our Denver properties, as comparable RevPAR increased 11.2%, driven by a mix of strong citywide demand driving a 5.7% increase in rate, as well as an increase in occupancy of 3.3 percentage points. Our Chicago and Houston markets underperformed, with RevPAR increases of 2.7% and 0.9%, respectively. The Chicago market was affected by severe winter weather and a decrease in citywide events, while the Houston market was affected by renovation activity at some of our larger properties and the decline in oil prices.  

Our international markets experienced a strong growth in RevPAR of 10.2%, led by our Latin American properties with RevPAR growth of 23.3%, on a constant US$ basis, as the JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro benefited from the FIFA World Cup and the JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City benefited from the rooms renovation completed in 2013. Our Canadian properties, in particular in Calgary, were affected negatively by falling oil prices and renovations, a trend that will continue into 2015 for both our Calgary and Houston properties.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (1)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

56

 

 

 

34,536

 

 

$

225.22

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

$

176.83

 

 

$

217.29

 

 

 

78.1

%

 

$

169.66

 

 

 

4.2

%

Suburban

 

 

28

 

 

 

9,807

 

 

 

165.80

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

118.60

 

 

 

156.26

 

 

 

70.7

 

 

 

110.51

 

 

 

7.3

 

Resort

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,570

 

 

 

258.09

 

 

 

73.6

 

 

 

189.95

 

 

 

244.50

 

 

 

72.5

 

 

 

177.23

 

 

 

7.2

 

Airport

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,339

 

 

 

144.66

 

 

 

81.1

 

 

 

117.32

 

 

 

133.71

 

 

 

79.9

 

 

 

106.82

 

 

 

9.8

 

All Types

 

 

106

 

 

 

55,252

 

 

 

210.40

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

162.07

 

 

 

201.43

 

 

 

76.4

 

 

 

153.86

 

 

 

5.3

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

Our airport properties led the portfolio for the year with RevPAR growth of 9.8%, driven by strong rate growth at our west coast airport properties.  Our urban properties experienced RevPAR growth of 4.2%, as some of our more concentrated urban markets, such as New York and Washington, D.C., experienced slower growth due to increased supply. The RevPAR improvements at our suburban properties of 7.3% was driven by an increase in rates of 6.1%, as high occupancy levels in urban markets has helped drive demand in adjacent suburban markets. An increase in leisure travel and corporate group demand in 2014 led to a 7.2% increase in RevPAR at our resort properties, reflecting a 5.6% increase in rate growth and improvement in occupancy of more than 1 percentage point.

Hotel Sales by Business Mix.

Our customers fall into three broad categories:  transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix results from 106 comparable hotels for which 2014 and 2013 business mix information is available. In 2014, overall revenue growth was due to both group and transient growth. Group business was inconsistent throughout the year, with strong growth in the first and third quarters offset by slow growth in the second quarter and a slight decline in the fourth quarter. The inconsistency primarily can be attributed to timing of holidays throughout the year, as well as significant renovation activity in the fourth quarter.  


Overall, group revenues improved 5.6% compared to the prior year, consisting of a 2.8% average room rate increase coupled with a 2.7% growth in group room nights sold. Corporate and association group revenue increased by a combined 5.0%, while other groups revenue, both leisure and government groups, grew by a combined 7.4%. During 2014, transient revenues increased 5.1% when compared to 2013, reflecting an increase in average room rate of 4.9%, and a 0.2% increase in nights sold. The transient average room rate increase resulted from a combination of segment price increases and an increasingly favorable shift to higher-rated retail customers.

2013 Compared to 2012

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

As of December 31, 2013, 105 of our 115 owned hotels were classified as comparable hotels. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” for a complete description of our comparable hotels. The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic market as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012(2)

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

6

 

 

 

3,672

 

 

$

193.69

 

 

 

77.6

%

 

$

150.25

 

 

$

189.22

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

$

140.11

 

 

 

7.2

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,450

 

 

 

278.42

 

 

 

86.6

 

 

 

241.20

 

 

 

272.52

 

 

 

83.5

 

 

 

227.64

 

 

 

6.0

 

Philadelphia

 

 

3

 

 

 

2,191

 

 

 

185.36

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

139.37

 

 

 

180.98

 

 

 

74.7

 

 

 

135.24

 

 

 

3.1

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,119

 

 

 

197.26

 

 

 

74.4

 

 

 

146.68

 

 

 

197.96

 

 

 

73.4

 

 

 

145.21

 

 

 

1.0

 

Atlanta

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

171.38

 

 

 

73.6

 

 

 

126.11

 

 

 

165.63

 

 

 

69.5

 

 

 

115.06

 

 

 

9.6

 

Florida

 

 

7

 

 

 

3,230

 

 

 

196.43

 

 

 

75.3

 

 

 

147.99

 

 

 

186.39

 

 

 

74.0

 

 

 

137.95

 

 

 

7.3

 

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,387

 

 

 

191.06

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.52

 

 

 

184.03

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

138.94

 

 

 

3.3

 

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

144.17

 

 

 

63.9

 

 

 

92.18

 

 

 

138.62

 

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

88.13

 

 

 

4.6

 

Houston

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

181.26

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

138.75

 

 

 

157.53

 

 

 

76.5

 

 

 

120.51

 

 

 

15.1

 

Phoenix

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

188.53

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

128.65

 

 

 

180.15

 

 

 

66.9

 

 

 

120.47

 

 

 

6.8

 

Seattle

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,774

 

 

 

168.60

 

 

 

78.1

 

 

 

131.71

 

 

 

158.04

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

118.73

 

 

 

10.9

 

San Francisco

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,701

 

 

 

199.66

 

 

 

80.3

 

 

 

160.41

 

 

 

180.22

 

 

 

80.8

 

 

 

145.55

 

 

 

10.2

 

Los Angeles

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,228

 

 

 

162.93

 

 

 

81.7

 

 

 

133.11

 

 

 

152.29

 

 

 

81.1

 

 

 

123.49

 

 

 

7.8

 

San Diego

 

 

5

 

 

 

4,691

 

 

 

186.14

 

 

 

78.2

 

 

 

145.59

 

 

 

182.78

 

 

 

76.4

 

 

 

139.69

 

 

 

4.2

 

Hawaii

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,256

 

 

 

353.41

 

 

 

82.0

 

 

 

289.89

 

 

 

332.04

 

 

 

83.3

 

 

 

276.47

 

 

 

4.9

 

Other

 

 

12

 

 

 

7,532

 

 

 

155.82

 

 

 

66.8

 

 

 

104.05

 

 

 

146.87

 

 

 

68.0

 

 

 

99.90

 

 

 

4.2

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,761

 

 

 

199.44

 

 

 

76.3

 

 

 

152.13

 

 

 

191.00

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

143.62

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

6

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

$

156.30

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

$

128.59

 

 

$

149.15

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

$

118.96

 

 

 

8.1

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

183.53

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

126.43

 

 

 

174.08

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

118.70

 

 

 

6.5

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

238.71

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

156.52

 

 

 

224.15

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

159.49

 

 

 

(1.9

)

International

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,517

 

 

 

187.71

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

136.31

 

 

 

179.22

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

131.15

 

 

 

3.9

 

All Markets - Constant US$

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.26

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

142.82

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

6

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

$

156.30

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

$

128.59

 

 

$

154.17

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

$

122.96

 

 

 

4.6

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

183.53

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

126.43

 

 

 

179.47

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

122.37

 

 

 

3.3

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

238.71

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

156.52

 

 

 

232.18

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

165.21

 

 

 

(5.3

)

International

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,517

 

 

 

187.71

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

136.31

 

 

 

185.24

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

135.56

 

 

 

0.6

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,761

 

 

 

199.44

 

 

 

76.3

 

 

 

152.13

 

 

 

191.00

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

143.62

 

 

 

5.9

 

All Markets - Nominal US$

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.64

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.10

 

 

 

5.6

 

___________

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

(2)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations in February compared to 2013 due to the leap year in 2012.

For 2013, our top performing markets were Houston, Seattle and San Francisco, with RevPAR increases of 15.1%, 10.9%, and 10.2%, respectively. The increase in our Houston market primarily resulted from higher average room rates, as these hotels shifted


from lower-rated group and transient business to higher-rated segments, as well as aggressive pricing increases in group for both retail and special corporate business. The increase in our Seattle market reflects a 6.7% increase in average room rate and a 3.0 percentage point increase in average occupancy driven by higher-rated group and transient demand. RevPAR growth in our San Francisco market was driven entirely by rate improvements from an improved business mix. Occupancy declined slightly during the year, but still remained at over 80%, as strong transient and group demand throughout the city have translated to RevPAR gains at our properties.  

RevPAR for our Atlanta hotels increased 9.6% for 2013, reflecting a strong citywide and special event calendar during the year that drove group and transient demand.

For 2013, our Los Angeles market RevPAR increased 7.8% primarily due to improved average room rates as a result of increased transient business driven by a mix shift to higher-rated segments and increased corporate group business.

For 2013, our Florida hotels increased RevPAR 7.3% as a result of a 5.4% increase in average room rate and a 1.3 percentage point increase in average occupancy driven by strong leisure demand.

Our Boston market RevPAR increased 7.2% as a result of a 3.5 percentage point increase in average occupancy and a 2.4% increase in average room rate due to strong group performance and transient business due in part to Major League Baseball’s Playoff and World Series events and the favorable 2012 comparisons related to Hurricane Sandy.  

Our New York hotels increased RevPAR 6.0% as a result of a 3.1 percentage point increase in average occupancy and a 2.2% increase in average room rate. In 2012, RevPAR growth was affected negatively by Hurricane Sandy in the fourth quarter and renovation disruption at several of our New York hotels. In 2013, RevPAR results have been tempered by supply growth in this market.

For 2013, our Washington D.C. market RevPAR increased only 1.0% due to a 1.0 percentage point increase in average occupancy resulting from transient room nights. For 2013, the sequestration and U.S. Federal Government shutdown negatively impacted this market by lowering demand for government and related industry business.

RevPAR in our Asia/Pacific and Canadian markets increased 8.1% and 6.5%, respectively, on a constant US$ basis.  For 2013, the increase at our Asia/Pacific hotels resulted from a 4.8% increase in average room rate and a 2.5 percentage point increase in average occupancy, driven by transient demand and the results of renovations completed in 2012. The improvement in RevPAR at our Canadian hotels primarily was driven by an increase in average room rate. RevPAR at our Latin American properties decreased 1.9% on a constant US$ basis, largely due to a decrease in occupancy. The nominal RevPAR results of our international properties were affected negatively by the relative strength of the US Dollar during 2013.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (2)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

54

 

 

 

34,183

 

 

$

212.05

 

 

 

77.8

%

 

$

164.95

 

 

$

205.15

 

 

 

76.4

%

 

$

156.81

 

 

 

5.2

%

Suburban

 

 

28

 

 

 

10,021

 

 

 

163.16

 

 

 

70.7

 

 

 

115.40

 

 

 

152.34

 

 

 

70.7

 

 

 

107.74

 

 

 

7.1

 

Resort/Conference

 

 

12

 

 

 

5,906

 

 

 

239.60

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

171.32

 

 

 

228.57

 

 

 

70.3

 

 

 

160.61

 

 

 

6.7

 

Airport

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,168

 

 

 

132.13

 

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

105.74

 

 

 

126.34

 

 

 

79.9

 

 

 

100.91

 

 

 

4.8

 

All Types

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.64

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.10

 

 

 

5.6

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations due to the leap year.

(2)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”


For 2013, our suburban properties led the portfolio with a 7.1% increase in RevPAR, as stable average occupancy levels at these properties have allowed operators to increase average daily room rates. We believe strong demand that has led to high average occupancy and increasing rates in adjacent urban markets has contributed to an increase in demand at our suburban properties.  For 2013, our resort/conference hotels experienced RevPAR growth of 6.7%, driven by a 4.8% increase in average room rate and a 1.2 percentage point increase in average occupancy due to higher demand.  Our urban properties experienced a RevPAR growth of 5.2% for 2013, as results were mixed throughout these markets. Strength in several of our west coast markets, as well as in our Houston and Atlanta markets, partially were offset by weakness in our Washington D.C. and Philadelphia markets.  

Hotel Sales by Business Mix. 

The information below is derived from business mix results from 102 comparable hotels for which 2013 and 2012 business mix information is available. In 2013, overall revenue growth was due mainly to transient revenues improving 7.5% compared to the prior year, consisting of a 4.0% average room rate increase coupled with a 3.4% growth in transient room nights sold. The transient average room rate increase resulted from a combination of segment price increases and an increasingly favorable business mix.  Higher-rated retail and non-qualified discount transient room nights increased 9.1% for the year, while lower-rated special corporate, government and discount segments decreased 0.9%. During 2013, group revenues increased 2.6% when compared to 2012, reflecting an increase in average room rate of 2.8%, while group room nights sold declined 0.2%. Corporate and association group revenues increased 9.9% and 2.6%, respectively, while discount group revenue decreased 8.4%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Host Inc. and Host L.P. The liquidity and capital resources of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are derived primarily from the activities of Host L.P. Host L.P., which generates the capital required by our business through itsfrom hotel operations, the direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness anddebt, the issuance of OP units.units or the sale of properties. Host Inc. is a REIT and its only materialsignificant asset is the ownership of partnership interests of Host L.P.; therefore, its financing and investing activities are conducted through Host L.P., except for the issuance of its common and preferred stock. Proceeds from stock issuances by Host Inc. are contributed to Host L.P. in exchange for OP units. Additionally, funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends or to repurchase stock are provided by Host L.P. Therefore, while we have noted those areas in which it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P., we have not included a separate discussion of the liquidity and capital resources of each entity as the discussion below can be appliedapplies both to both Host Inc. and Host L.P.

Overview. Overview.We look to maintain a capital structure and liquidity profile with an appropriate balance of cash, debt and equity in order to provide financial flexibility, given the inherent volatility in the lodging industry. During 2011, asWe believe this strategy will result in a lower overall cost of capital, allow us to complete opportunistic investments and acquisitions at all times in the lodging cycle, and will position us to manage potential declines in operations caused by the inherent volatility in the lodging industry. As operations have improved in the past several years, we maintainedhave executed successfully on our focus on strategically decreasingstrategy to decrease our debt-to-equityleverage as measured by our net debt-to-EBITDA ratio and reduce our debt service obligations, leading to an increase in our fixed charge coverage ratio. Currently, these financial metrics, as defined in in our credit facility, are stronger than at any point since we split from Marriott International in 1993. These improvements were due to stronger operations but also were accomplished through (i) acquisitions and other investments, the majority of which were completed with available cash and proceeds from equity issuances, and (ii) the repayment and refinancing of senior notes and mortgage debt in order to extend maturity dates and obtain lower interest rates.

As we continue to achieve our balance sheet objectives, we intend to use available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in our portfolio to the extent that we are able to find suitable investment opportunities that meet our return requirements. If we are unable to find appropriate investment opportunities and, assuming operations continue to improve, we may, over time, consider other uses of any available cash, such as a return of capital through dividends or common stock repurchases.  

We also look to structurehave structured our debt profile to allow us to access different forms of financing, primarily senior notes, exchangeable debenturesmaintain a balanced maturity schedule and corporate credit facility draws, as well as mortgage debt. Generally, this means that we will look to minimize the number of assets that are encumbered by mortgage debt, minimize near-term maturities, and maintain a balanced maturity schedule. Asdebt. We have access to multiple types of December 31, 2011, 107 of our 121 hotels were unencumbered by mortgage debt andfinancing as approximately 81%90% of our debt consists of senior notes, exchangeable

debentures and borrowings under our credit facility, allnone of which are not collateralized by specific hotel properties. Additionally,Our senior unsecured debt is rated investment grade by Moody’s Investor Services, Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor’s Rating Service, which management believes will allow us to borrow capital at better rates than previously achieved. In 2014, we were able to amend and restate our maturities for 2012 are 6.9% ofsenior unsecured credit facility, lowering the margin on our total debt ($7all-in pricing by 30 basis points on the revolver portion and 32.5 basis points on the term loan and extending the maturity date. We also repaid $371 million of senior notes and $388 million of exchangeable debentures). We also entered into a new senior revolving credit facility that expanded our revolving borrowing capacity to $1 billion and has an initial maturity of November 2015. As a result, our liquidity position remains very strong, with approximately $826 million of cash and cash equivalents and $883 million of available capacity under our credit facility. As a result of the current operating environment and the flexibility provided bydraws on our credit facility we anticipate that over time we will reduceand $384 million of mortgage and other debt. Additionally, 96% of our available cash balances closer to the $100 million to $150 million level. hotels (as measured by revenues) are unencumbered by mortgage debt.


We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital markets to take advantage of opportunities to enhance our portfolio, withstand declines in operating cash flow, pay our near-term debt maturities and fund our capital expenditures programs. We may continue to access the capital markets if favorable conditions exist in order to further enhance our liquidity and to fund cash needs. The charttable below details our significant cash flows for the three years ended December 31 2011 (in millions):

 

  2011 2010 2009 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  $1,113   $1,642   $508  

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

 

$

826

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (287  (529  1,134  

 

 

(177

)

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $826   $1,113   $1,642  

 

$

684

 

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

  $661   $520   $552  

 

$

1,150

 

 

$

1,019

 

 

$

781

 

Investing activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions and investments

   (1,096  (434  (7

 

 

(216

)

 

 

(259

)

 

 

(579

)

Dispositions and return of investment

   47    12    251  

Dispositions and return of capital from investments

 

 

539

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

296

 

Capital expenditures

   (542  (309  (340

 

 

(436

)

 

 

(436

)

 

 

(638

)

Financing activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuances of debt

   955    500    906  

Net draws (repayments) on credit facility

   63    56    (410

Issuances of senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

800

 

Issuances of mortgage debt

 

 

4

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

100

 

Issuance of credit facility term loan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Net draws (repayments) on credit facility revolver

 

 

(221

)

 

 

186

 

 

 

142

 

Repurchase of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures

   (404  (821  (139

 

 

(150

)

 

 

(801

)

 

 

(1,795

)

Debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

   (210  (364  (342

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(113

)

Host Inc.:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issuances

   323    406    767  

Redemption of preferred stock

   —      (101  —    

Common stock issuance

 

 

4

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

Dividends on common stock

   (70  (20  (42

 

 

(469

)

 

 

(313

)

 

 

(187

)

Host L.P.:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common OP unit issuance

   323    406    767  

 

 

4

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

Redemption of preferred units

   —      (101  —    

Distributions on common OP units

   (71  (20  (43

 

 

(475

)

 

 

(317

)

 

 

(190

)

Cash Requirements.We use cash primarily for acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt payments, operating costs, corporate and other expenses, as well as dividends and distributions to stockholders and unitholders. As a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain, on an annual basis. Funds used by Host Inc. to make cash distributions are provided by Host L.P. Our primary sources of cash are cash from operations, proceeds from the sale of assets, borrowings under our credit facility and debt and equity issuances.

Below is a schedule ofThe following graph summarizes our aggregate debt maturities through 2014. Asas of December 31, 2011, our weighted average interest rate is 6.3% and our weighted average maturity is 4.4 years. See “—Financial Condition” for more information on our debt maturities. During 2011, we took advantage of lower interest rates to issue new debt and used the proceeds to repay near-term maturities, resulting in the issuance of approximately $955 million of senior notes and mortgage debt, that has been or will be used to fund the repayment or redemption of $792 million of senior notes and exchangeable debentures (including the $388 million of 2007 Debentures that we expect to be put to us in April of 2012) and $210 million of mortgage debt.February 20, 2015:

Remaining Debt Maturities 2012 – 2014

(in millions)

 

   2012   2013   2014 

2.625% Exchangeable Senior Debentures (1)

  $388    $—      $—    

Senior notes

   7     —       500  

3.250% Exchangeable Senior Debentures (2)

   —       —       175  

Mortgage loan, Orlando World Center Marriott

   —       246     —    

Mortgage loan, JW Marriott, Washington, D.C (3)

   —       110     —    

Mortgage loan, Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

   —       —       134  

Mortgage loan, The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

   —       —       300  

Other bonds

   —       —       32  

Principal amortization on other debt

   5     3     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total maturities

  $400    $359    $1,142  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Our 2.625% Exchangeable Senior Debentures are due

The debt maturing in 2027, but are subject to2015 assumes the exercise of a put option by the holders on April 15, 2012, which we anticipate they will exercise. The $388 million represents the face amount of the outstanding principal at December 31, 2011.our exchangeable senior debentures.

(2)

Our 3.250% Exchangeable Senior Debentures are due in 2024, but are

The term loan and credit facility agreements contain extension options that would extend the maturity of both instruments to 2019, subject to a put option by the holders on April 15, 2014. The $175 million represents the face amount of the outstanding principal at December 31, 2011.meeting certain conditions.

(3)This mortgage can be extended for one year, at our option, provided that debt coverage exceeds certain ratios and other conditions are met.

Capital Resources. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately $826 million of cash and cash equivalents, which was a decrease of $287 million from December 31, 2010. We also had $883 million available under our credit facility at December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, our secured mortgage indebtedness totaled approximately $1.0 billion, which represents approximately 17% of our overall indebtedness, and is secured by 14 of our hotels. We depend primarily on external sources of capital to finance future growth, including acquisitions. As a result, the liquidity and debt capacity provided by our credit facility and the ability to issue senior unsecured debt are key components of our capital structure. Therefore, ourOur financial flexibility (including our ability to incur debt, make distributions and make investments) is contingent on our ability to maintain compliance with the financial covenants of such indebtedness, which include, among other things, the allowable amounts of leverage, interest coverage and fixed charges. During 2010 and 2011, we have decreased our near-term debt maturities, expanded our borrowing capacity under our senior revolving credit facility and maintained compliance with our senior note and credit facility covenants.

If, at any time, we determine that market conditions are favorable, after taking into account our liquidity requirements, we may seek to issue and sell shares of Host Inc. common stock in registered public offerings, including through sales directly on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under our existing or a future “at the market” offering program, or to issue and sell shares of Host Inc. preferred stock. We also may seek to cause Host L.P. to issue senior notes or debentures exchangeable for shares of Host Inc. common stock or senior notes.stock. Given our total debt level and maturity schedule, we also will continue to redeem or refinance senior notes and mortgage debt from time to time, taking advantage of favorable market conditions. In February of 2012,2015, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of up to $500 million of senior notes, exchangeable debentures and mortgage debt (otherother than in accordance with its terms). Separately, the Board of Directors authorized redemptions and repurchases of all or a portion of $175 million principal amount of our 3 1/4% exchangeable debentures. Any redemption of the 3 1/4% exchangeable debentures will not reduce the $500 million of Board authority noted above to repurchase other debt securities.terms. We may purchase senior notes and exchangeable debentures for cash through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, a tender offer or, in some cases, through the early redemption of such securities

pursuant to their terms. Repurchases of debt if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Any refinancing or retirement before the maturity date wouldwill affect earnings and FFO per diluted share as a result of the payment of any applicable call premiums and the acceleration of previously deferred financing costs. In addition, while we intend to use any available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in our hotel portfolio, to the extent we do not identify appropriate investments, we may elect in the future to use available cash for other uses, including share repurchases. Accordingly, in light of our priorities in managing our capital structure and liquidity profile and given the movement in prevailing conditions and relative pricing in the capital markets, and relative pricing, we may, at any time, subject to applicable securities laws, be considering, or be in discussions with respect to the purchaserepurchase or issuance of exchangeable debentures and/or senior notes or the repurchase or sale of common stock, exchangeable debentures and/or senior notes.stock. Any such transactions may, subject to applicable securities laws, occur simultaneously.

On April 21, 2011,We continue actively to explore potential acquisitions and anticipate that any such future acquisitions will be funded primarily by proceeds from sales of properties, but also potentially from equity offerings of Host Inc. entered into a new Sales Agency Financing Agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, through which, or by issuances of OP units by Host Inc. may issue and sell, from time to time, sharesL.P., the incurrence of common stock having an aggregate offering pricedebt, available cash or advances under our credit facility. Given the nature of up to $400 million. The agreement followed the completion of $400 million of sales under a similar agreement, also with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, Inc.,these transactions, we can make no assurances that was entered into in 2010. The saleswe will be madesuccessful in “at the market” offerings under “SEC” rules,acquiring any one or more hotels that we may review, bid on or negotiate to purchase. We may acquire additional properties through various structures, including sales made directly on the NYSE. BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC is acting as sales agent. Host Inc. is not under an obligation to sell any shares. During 2011, we issued 19.1 million shares, through this new programtransactions involving single assets, portfolios, joint ventures and the remaining capacityacquisitions of the 2010 program, at an average pricesecurities or assets of $17.09 per share, for net proceeds of $323 million. As of December 31, 2011, we have $174 million of capacity remaining under this program.other REITs.

Counterparty Credit Risk. We are subject to counterparty credit risk, which relates to the ability of counterparties to meet their contractual payment obligations or the potential non-performance of counterparties to deliver contracted commodities or services at the contracted price. We assess the ability of our counterparties to fulfill their obligation to determine the impact, if any, of counterparty bankruptcy or insolvency on our financial condition. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility and amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. Our credit exposure in each of these cases is limited. Our exposure with regard to our cash and the $883$796 million available under our credit facility is mitigated, as the credit risk is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions. At December 31, 2011,2014, the exposure risk related to our derivative contracts totaled $22$13 million and the counterparties were investment grade financial institutions.

Sources and Uses of Cash.During 2011,In 2014, our sources of cash included cash from operations proceeds from debt and equity issuances and proceeds from the sale or transfer of assets.asset sales. Uses of cash during the year consisted of acquisitions, investments in our joint ventures, capital expenditures, operating costs, debt repayments and repurchases and distributions to equity holders. During 2012, weWe anticipate that our primarysources and uses of cash will include acquisitions and investments, capital expenditures at our hotels, the repayment or repurchase of our debt maturing in the near-term and distributions to equity holders. We anticipate that our primary sources of cash for 2012 will include cash from operations and proceeds from equity and debt issuances and hotel dispositions.be similar during 2015.

Cash Provided by Operations. Our cash provided by operations for 20112014 increased $141$131 million to $661$1,150 million compared to 20102013, primarily due to improvementsimproved operations at our hotels and a decrease in our GAAP operating profit, after adjusting for non-cash items, which primarily consist of depreciation expense.cash interest payments.

Cash Used in Investing Activities. Approximately $1.6 billion$93 million of cash was used in investing activities during 2011. This included approximately $1.0 billion of acquisitions, which is net of debt and other liabilities assumed and $5422014 compared to $75 million of capital expenditures. We also invested approximately $49 million of cash in our unconsolidated joint ventures, which was offset partially by the $40 million of proceeds we received for the transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly2013. In addition to the Euro JV Fund II.

During 2011, we purchased 10 hotel assets located in New York, San Diego, Melbourne, Australia,acquisition, investment and four cities in New Zealand for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.1 billion. We recognized the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interestsdisposition activity detailed in the acquiree at the fair valuecharts below, we spent approximately $436 million on the acquisition date.

While we continue to actively explore potential acquisitions, given the nature of the transactions, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in acquiring any one or more hotel properties that we may review, bid on or negotiate to purchase. We may acquire additional properties through various structures, including transactions involving single assets, portfolios, joint ventures and acquisitions of all or substantially all of the securities or assets

of other REITs. We anticipate that future acquisitions will be funded primarily by proceeds from equity offerings of Host Inc., or issuance of OP units by Host L.P., but potentially also from the proceeds from sales of properties from our existing portfolio, the incurrence of debt, available cash or advances under our credit facility.

In 2011, total capital expenditures, increased $233 million to $542 million.the same level as in 2013. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures for 20112014 were approximately $327$324 million, which reflects an increase of approximately 68%7% from 20102013 levels. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures generally are generally funded by the furniture, fixture and equipment funds established at certain of our hotels (typically funded with approximately 5% of property revenues) and by our available cash. We also spent approximately $215$112 million in 20112014 on ROI/redevelopment projects and acquisition capital expenditures, which reflects an increasea decrease of approximately 89%16% compared to 2010 levels, as these2013 levels. Additionally, we have capitalized certain internal costs and interest expense associated with our capital expenditures projects include some of our largest hotels. Capital expenditures have totaled approximately $2.5 billion over the past five years. As a result, we believe that our properties are in a strong competitive positionaccordance with respect to their market competitors.GAAP. These capitalized costs were $14 million, $11 million and $11 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.


The following table summarizestables summarize significant investment activities and dispositions that have been completed as of December 31, 2011February 20, 2015 (in millions):

 

Transaction
Date

      

Description of Transaction

  

Cash Paid

  

Host’s

Investment

 

Investments/

Acquisitions

       

September

   2011    

Acquisition of the remaining 51% of Tiburon Golf Ventures

  $(11 $(11

June –December

   2011    

Investment in the Asian JV

   (19  (19

September

   2011    

Investment in Euro JV Fund II—Pullman Bercy, Paris acquisition

   (20  (20

June

   2011    

Initial investment in Euro JV Fund II—transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly (1)

   —      (19

April

   2011    

Acquisition of a 75% controlling interest in the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (2)

   (48  (114

March

   2011    

Acquisition of the New York Helmsley Hotel

   (314  (314

March

   2011    

Acquisition of the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (3)

   (566  (572

February

   2011    

Acquisition of the New Zealand portfolio

   (145  (145

January – December

   2011    

Investment in Euro JV Fund I

   (11  (11

September

   2010    

Acquisition of the JW Marriott, Rio de Janeiro

   (47  (47

September

   2010    

Acquisition of a 90% ownership interest of the W New York, Union Square (4)

   (78  (169

August

   2010    

Acquisition of the Westin Chicago River North

   (165  (165

July

   2010    

Acquisition of the Le Méridien Piccadilly

   (53  (98

April

   2010    

Purchase of a mortgage note on a portfolio of hotels

   (53  (53
      

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Total acquisitions

  $(1,530 $(1,757
      

 

 

  

 

 

 

Dispositions

       

August

   2011    

Disposition of South Bend Marriott

   $6  

June

   2011    

Proceeds from transfer of Le Méridien Piccadilly (1)

    40  

June

   2010    

Disposition of The Ritz-Carlton, Dearborn

    3  

February

   2010    

Disposition of Sheraton Braintree

    9  
       

 

 

 
    

Total dispositions

   $58  
       

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Description of Transaction

 

Investment

 

Acquisitions/Investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January-December

2014

 

Investment in Maui JV

 

$

(40

)

January-December

2014

 

Development costs for two hotels in Rio de Janeiro

 

 

(13

)

January-December

2014

 

Investment in Euro JV

 

 

(21

)

August

2014

 

Acquisition of b2 miami downtown hotel

 

 

(58

)

January

2014

 

Acquisition of The Powell Hotel

 

 

(75

)

December

2013

 

Acquisition of land at the New York Marriott Marquis (1)

 

 

(20

)

January-December

2013

 

Development costs for two hotels in Rio de Janeiro

 

 

(19

)

May-August

2013

 

Investment in Euro JV

 

 

(67

)

May

2013

 

Acquisition of Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

(139

)

 

 

 

Total acquisitions/investments

 

$

(452

)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Our initial investment in the Euro JV Fund II was funded in conjunction with the transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly. We received cash proceeds of $40 million and recorded $19 million for the fair value of the asset transferred.
(2)

The investment price was $45 million, which includes $25 million of consideration paid in prior years.

Transaction Date

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds(1)

 

 

Sales Price

 

Dispositions/Return on Investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

2014

 

Disposition of Dayton Marriott

 

$

18

 

 

$

21

 

December

2014

 

Disposition of Greensboro-High Point Marriott Airport

 

 

16

 

 

 

19

 

October

2014

 

Disposition of Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

 

 

189

 

 

 

199

 

April

2014

 

Distribution from Euro JV

 

 

17

 

 

 

17

 

February

2014

 

Disposition of Courtyard Nashua

 

 

9

 

 

 

10

 

January

2014

 

Sale of 89% interest in the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown(2)

 

290

 

 

 

270

 

December

2013

 

Disposition of Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum by the Galleria

 

53

 

 

 

56

 

November

2013

 

Disposition of Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta

 

62

 

 

 

63

 

November

2013

 

Disposition of Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront

 

83

 

 

 

87

 

June

2013

 

Disposition of The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco

 

146

 

 

 

161

 

April

2013

 

Sale of land adjacent to Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

24

 

 

 

24

 

January

2013

 

Disposition of Atlanta Marriott Marquis

 

276

 

 

 

293

 

 

 

 

Total dispositions

 

$

1,183

 

 

$

1,220

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Proceeds are net of FF&E replacement funds paid by the purchasers and retained at the hotels, transfer taxes and other sales costs.  

(2)

Sales price represents our 75% interest and a preferredthe 89% interest in the joint venturehotel that indirectly owns the hotel.

(3)Includes payment of $19 million for the FF&E replacement fund retained at the property. Additionally, $6 million of the acquisition was funded through the issuance of common OP units by Host L.P.
(4)The investment price representssold. Net proceeds also include our 90% interest in the joint venture that acquired the hotel, including our11% portion of the assumption byproceeds received from the joint venture of a $115$230 million mortgage loan (which was subsequently repaid in 2010) and other liabilities valuedissued by the partnership at $8.5 million.closing.  

Cash Provided by/Used in Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $628 million for 2011, as compared to cash used in financing activities of $343was $1,226 million for 2014, as compared to $493 million in 2010.2013. During 2011,2014, cash used primarily consisted of debt repayments or repurchases of approximately $704 million,and dividend payments, while we received proceeds of approximately $1.4 billion through the issuance2013 also included issuances of debt and equity securities.

The following table summarizes significant debt issuances, and assumptions, net of deferred financing costs, that have been completed as of December 31, 2011February 20, 2015 (in millions):

 

Transaction
Date

      

Description of Transaction

  

Transaction

Amount

 

Debt Issuances

  

    

November

   2011    

Proceeds from the issuance of 6%, $300 million Series Y senior notes

  $295  

November

   2011    

Issuance of mortgage debt on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf

   79  

May

   2011    

Proceeds from the issuance of 5 7/8%, $500 million Series W senior notes (2)

   489  

April

   2011    

Draw on credit facility to acquire Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1)

   50  

March

   2011    

Draw on credit facility for the repayment of the mortgage debt secured by our four Canadian properties

   103  

February

   2011    

Issuance of mortgage debt on our portfolio of hotels in New Zealand

   80  

October

   2010    

Proceeds from the issuance of 6%, $500 million Series U senior notes (3)

   492  

July

   2010    

Draw on credit facility for the acquisition of the Le Méridien Piccadilly

   56  
      

 

 

 
    

Total

  $1,644  
      

 

 

 

Debt Assumptions

  

April

   2011    

Assumption of mortgage debt on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1)

  $86  

September

   2010    

Assumption of the 6.385% mortgage debt on W New York, Union Square (1)

   115  

July

   2010    

Assumption of the mortgage debt on the Le Méridien Piccadilly (1)

   51  
      

 

 

 
    

Total

  $252  
      

 

 

 

(1)These amounts are no longer outstanding at December 31, 2011. They have been refinanced, repaid, or in the case of the Le Méridien Piccadilly mortgage debt, transferred to our Euro JV.
(2)

The 5 7/8% Series W senior notes were exchanged for the 5 7/8% Series X senior notes due in 2019 in January 2012.

(3)The 6% Series U senior notes were exchanged for the 6% Series V senior notes due in 2020 in February 2011.

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds

 

Debt Issuances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February - December

2013

 

Net draw on revolver portion of credit facility

 

$

186

 

December

2013

 

Issuance of mortgage debt on the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

150

 

March

2013

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $400 million 3 3/4% Series D senior notes

 

 

396

 

 

 

 

Total issuances

 

$

732

 


The following table presents significant debt repayments, including prepayment premiums, since the beginningthat have been completed as of January 2010February 20, 2015 (in millions):

 

Transaction

Date

      

Description of Transaction

  

Transaction

Amount

 

Cash Repayments

  

    

November

   2011    

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf

  $(78

August-December

   2011    

Repurchase of $138 million face amount of the 2007 Debentures

   (139

June

   2011    

Repayment of credit facility with proceeds from transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the European JV Fund II

   (40

June

   2011    

Redemption of a portion of the 2004 Debentures

   (16

June

   2011    

Redemption of $250 million face amount of 7 1/8% Series K senior notes

   (253

May

   2011    

Repayment of credit facility with proceeds from the Series W senior notes issuance

   (50

March

   2011    

Repayment of the 5.2% mortgage debt secured by our four Canadian properties

   (132

December

   2010    

Repayment of a portion of the mortgage loan secured by the Orlando World Center Marriott

   (54

December

   2010    

Repayment of 9.8% mortgage loan secured by the JW Marriott, Desert Springs

   (71

November

   2010    

Redemption of $250 million face amount of 7 1/8% Series K senior notes

   (253

October

   2010    

Defeasance of 6.385% mortgage debt on W New York, Union Square

   (120

August

   2010    

Redemption of $225 million face amount of 7 1/8% Series K senior notes

   (230

February

   2010    

Repayment of 7.4% mortgage loan secured by the Atlanta Marriott Marquis

   (124

January

   2010    

Redemption of $346 million face amount of 7% Series M senior notes

   (352

2010/2011

    

Principal amortization

   (18
      

 

 

 
    

Total cash repayments

  $(1,930
      

 

 

 
Non-cash Debt Transactions  

June

   2011    

Extinguishment of the mortgage debt on the Le Méridien Piccadilly through transfer to the Euro JV Fund II (1)

  $(52

June

   2011    

Exchange of a portion of the 2004 Debentures for common stock

   (134
      

 

 

 
    

Total non-cash debt transactions

  $(186
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Cash Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January - October

2014

 

Net repayment on revolver portion of credit facility

 

$

(221

)

October

2014

 

Redemption of Dulles Airport industrial revenue bond

 

 

(12

)

June

2014

 

Redemption of Philadelphia Airport Marriott industrial revenue bond

 

 

(40

)

June

2014

 

Redemption of Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott industrial revenue

     bond

 

 

(32

)

February

2014

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach

     Marriott

 

 

(300

)

February

2014

 

Redemption of $150 million of 6 3/4% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(152

)

December

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

(31

)

December

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

(134

)

September

2013

 

Redemption of $200 million of 6 3/4% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(202

)

June

2013

 

Redemption of $200 million of 6 3/4% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(202

)

May

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

(246

)

May

2013

 

Redemption of $400 million of 9% Series T senior notes

 

 

(418

)

2013/2014

 

 

Principal amortization

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

Total cash repayments

 

$

(1,992

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash Debt Transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March

2013

 

Exchange of a portion of the 2004 Debentures for Host Inc. common stock (1)

 

$

(174

)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

In additionconnection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued approximately 11.5 million common OP units to the mortgage debt transferred, we transferred the capital lease liability related to the leasehold interest in Le Méridien Piccadilly of £38 million ($61 million).Host Inc.

Equity/Capital Transactions. In 2011,2013, Host Inc. issued 19.116.9 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $17.09$17.78 per share, for proceeds of approximately $323$297 million, net of commissions of approximately $3.3$3 million. These issuances were made in “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to Sales Agency Financing Agreementssales agency financing agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC.LLC and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. and represented the completion of sales available under these agreements. The net proceeds were used to fund hotel acquisitions, development projects and a portion of our ROI/redevelopment capital expenditures. There is approximately $174 million of issuance capacity remaining under the current agreement. In the fourth quarter of 2011, Host Inc. issued approximately 2.3 million shares of common stock through the program, at an average price of $14.56 per share, for proceeds of $34 million, net of approximately $340,000were no “at-the-market” issuances in commissions. In 2010, Host Inc. issued 26.9 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $15.25 per share, for proceeds of approximately $406 million, net of commissions of approximately $4.1 million, through “at-the-market” programs. In exchange for the cash proceeds of the shares issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. issued OP Units to Host of 18.7 million and 26.4 million for 2011 and 2010, respectively.2014.

The following table summarizes significant equity transactions that have been completed as of December 31, 2011February 20, 2015 (in millions):

 

Transaction

Date

      

Description of Transaction

  

Transaction

Amount

 
Equity of Host Inc.  

January–December

  

2011

  

Issuance of approximately 19 million common shares under Host Inc.’s continuous equity offering programs (1)

  $323  

January–December

  

2011

  

Dividend payments (2)

   (70

January–December

  

2010

  

Dividend payments (2)

   (20

January–December

  

2010

  

Issuance of approximately 27 million common shares under Host Inc.’s continuous equity offering programs (3)

   406  

June

  

2010

  

Preferred stock redemption (4)

   (101
      

 

 

 
    

Net proceeds from equity transactions

  $538  
      

 

 

 
Non-cash      

June

  

2011

  

Issuance of approximately 8.8 million common shares through the exchange of the 2004 Debentures (5)

  $134  
      

 

 

 
    

Non-cash equity

  $134  
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Equity of Host Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

2015

 

Dividend payment (1)(2)

 

$

(197

)

January-December

2014

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(469

)

January-December

2013

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(313

)

January-September

2013

 

Issuance of approximately 16.9 million common shares under Host Inc.'s "at-the-

     market" equity program (3)

 

 

297

 

 

 

 

Cash payments on equity transactions

 

$

(682

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash Equity Transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March

2013

 

Issuance of approximately 11.7 million common shares through the exchange of the

      2004 Debentures (4)

 

$

174

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

Our dividend payment for the fourth quarter of 2014 was made in January 2015, but accrued at December 31, 2014.

(2)

In connection with the dividends, Host L.P. made distributions of $199 million in 2015, $475 million in 2014 and $317 million in 2013 to its common unit holders.

(3)

In exchange for the cash consideration received from the issuance of these shares, Host L.P. issued to Host Inc. approximately 1916.5 million common OP units.units in 2013.  

(2)

(4)

In connection with the dividends, Host LP made distributions of $71 million in 2011 and $20 million in 2010 to its common unit holders.
(3)In exchange for the cash consideration received from the issuance of these shares, Host L.P. issued to Host Inc. approximately 26 million common OP units.
(4)Host L.P. redeemed its equivalent preferred OP units.
(5)

In connection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued approximately 8.611.5 million common OP units.units to Host Inc.

Financial Condition

As of December 31, 2011,2014, our total debt was approximately $5.8$4.0 billion, of which 90%79% carried a fixed rate of interest. Total debt was comprised of the following (in millions):

 

   December 31,
2011
   December 31,
2010
 

Series K senior notes, with a rate of 7 1/8% due November 2013

  $—      $250  

Series O senior notes, with a rate of 6 3/8% due March 2015

   650     650  

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6 3/4% due June 2016

   800     800  

Series S senior notes, with a rate of 6 7/8% due November 2014

   498     498  

Series T senior notes, with a rate of 9% due May 2017

   390     388  

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

   500     500  

Series W senior notes, with a rate of 5 7/8% due June 2019 (1)

   496     —    

Series Y senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

   300     —    

2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 3 1/4% due April 2024

   175     325  

2007 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2 5/8% due April 2027

   385     502  

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2 1/2% due October 2029

   342     329  

Senior notes, with rate of 10.0% due May 2012

   7     7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total senior notes

   4,543     4,249  

Credit facility

   117     58  

Mortgage debt (non-recourse) secured by $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion of real estate assets, with an average interest rate of 5.0% and 4.7% at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, maturing through December 2023 (2)

   1,006     1,025  

Other

   87     145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt

  $5,753    $5,477  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

The 5 7/8% Series W senior notes were exchanged for the 5 7/8% Series X senior notes due in 2019 in January 2012.

(2)The assets securing mortgage debt represents the book value of real estate assets, net of accumulated depreciation. These amounts do not represent the current market value of the assets.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6¾% due June 2016

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Series X senior notes, with a rate of 5⅞% due June 2019

 

 

498

 

 

 

497

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

 

300

 

 

 

300

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

350

 

 

 

350

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

450

 

 

 

450

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

400

 

 

 

400

 

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2½% due October 2029

 

 

386

 

 

 

371

 

Total senior notes

 

 

2,884

 

 

 

3,018

 

Credit facility revolver

 

 

204

 

 

 

446

 

Credit facility term loan due June 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 5.0% and 4.1% at

     December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, maturing through January 2024

 

 

404

 

 

 

709

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

$

3,992

 

 

$

4,759

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate debt maturities at December 31, 20112014 are as follows (in millions):

 

   Senior notes
and
credit facility
  Mortgage debt
and other
   Total 

2012 (1)

  $395   $5    $400  

2013

   —      359     359  

2014 (1)

   675    467     1,142  

2015 (1)

   1,167    12     1,179  

2016

   800    165     965  

Thereafter

   1,700    69     1,769  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   4,737    1,077     5,814  

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

   (77  2     (75

Fair value hedge adjustment

   —      12     12  

Capital lease obligations

   —      2     2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $4,660   $1,093    $5,753  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

Mortgage debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

credit facility

 

 

and other

 

 

Total

 

2015 (1)

 

$

400

 

 

$

 

 

$

400

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

253

 

2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

2018

 

 

204

 

 

 

 

 

 

204

 

2019

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

2,150

 

 

 

 

3,604

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

4,007

 

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

 

 

(16

)

Capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

$

3,588

 

 

$

404

 

 

$

3,992

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The debt maturing in 2012, 2014 and 2015 includes $388 million, $175 million and $400 million respectively, of our exchangeable senior debentures that are subject to a put option by holders in those years.that year.

Senior Notes.The following summary is a description of the material provisions of the indentures governing our various senior notes issued by Host L.P., to which we refer to collectively as the senior notes indenture. We pay interest on each series of our outstanding senior notes semi-annually in arrears at the respective annual rates indicated on the table above. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, our senior notes are equal in right of payment with all of Host L.P.’s unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to all subordinated obligations of Host L.P.


Pledges and Guarantees. Under the senior notes indenture, all Host L.P. subsidiaries which guarantee Host L.P. debt similarly are required to similarly guarantee debt issuances under the indenture. Also, to the extent the equity of any subsidiaries of Host L.P. areis pledged to secure borrowings under the credit facility, such collateral likewise is likewise required to secure senior note issuances under the senior notes indenture. Because bothWhile the pledges and guarantees supporting the prior credit facility were released upon entering into the new senior bank credit facility in November 2011, the collateral pledges and guarantees that benefited ratably Host L.P.’s senior notes also were released, such that all existing and future issuances of senior notes under the senior notes indenture similarly are on an unsecured basis and do not have the benefit of any subsidiary guarantees. While the current credit facility initiallycurrently does not include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests, theysuch guarantees or pledges subsequently will be required in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges would ratably benefit ratably the credit facility, as well as the senior notes issued under the senior notes indenture and certain hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. If triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would not provide guarantees or pledges of equity interests. Further, if at any time our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters or Host L.P. has an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating, such guarantees and pledges may be released.

Series D Senior Notes Restrictive Covenants

In March 2013, we completed an underwritten public offering of $400 million aggregate principal amount of Series D senior notes bearing interest at a rate of 3.75% per year due in 2023. The Series D senior notes are not redeemable prior to 90 days before the October 15, 2023 maturity date, except at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus a make-whole premium as set forth in the senior notes indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date. The notes were issued under our existing senior notes indenture and have covenants customary for investment grade debt, primarily limitations on our ability to incur debt. There are no restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Because these senior notes were issued after we attained an investment grade rating, while all other series of our senior notes were issued before we had attained an investment grade rating, the covenants of these senior notes are different than the covenants applicable to our other senior notes.  

Under the terms of the Series D senior notes, indenture, ourHost L.P.’s ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions is subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions, including the achievement of an EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio of at least 2.0x. This1.5x by Host L.P. As calculated, this ratio is calculatedexcludes from interest expense items such as call premiums and deferred financing charges that are included in accordance withinterest expense on Host L.P.’s consolidated statement of operations. In addition, the terms of our senior notes indenturecalculation is based on Host L.P.’s pro forma results for the four prior fiscal quarters, giving effect to certain transactions, such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings, as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, interest expense excludes items such as the gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisition of a loan to establish the debt at fair value and approximately $29 million of non-cash interest expense recorded in 2011 related to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations. Our subsidiaries are subject to the restrictive covenants in the indenture, however, in certain circumstances, we are permitted to designate certain subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries. These unrestricted subsidiaries are not subject to the restrictive covenants (unless they are

guarantors) and may engage in transactions to dispose of or encumber their assets or otherwise incur additional indebtedness without complying with the restrictive covenants in the indenture. If we were to designate additional subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries, neither the EBITDA generated by nor the interest expense allocated to these entities would be included in our ratio calculations. Other covenants limiting our ability to incur indebtedness, Host Inc.’s ability to pay dividends and Host L.P.’s ability to make distributionsincur indebtedness include maintaining total indebtedness of less than 65% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values), excluding intangible assets, and maintaining secured indebtedness and subsidiary indebtedness of less than 45%40% of adjusted total assets.assets and maintaining total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding unsecured indebtedness of Host L.P. and its subsidiaries. So long as we maintainHost L.P. maintains the required level of interest coverage and satisfysatisfies these and other conditions in the senior notes indenture, weit may make preferred or common OP unit distributions and incur additional debt under the senior notes indenture, including debt incurred in connection with an acquisition. In addition, even if we are below the coverage levels otherwise required to incur debt and make distributions, we still are permitted to incur certain types of debt, including (i) credit facility debt, (ii) refinancing debt, (iii) up to $300 million or $400 million, depending on the series of senior notes, of mortgage debt whose proceeds would be used to repay debt under credit facility (and permanently reduce our ability to borrow under the credit facility by such amount), and (iv) up to $100 million or $150 million, depending on the series of senior notes, of other debt.  We also are permitted to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s REIT status.

Our senior notes indenture also imposes restrictions on customary matters, such as Host L.P.’s ability to make distributions on, redeem or repurchase its OP units; make investments; permit payment or dividend restrictions on certain of our subsidiaries; sell assets; guarantee indebtedness; enter into transactions with affiliates; create certain liens; and sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies. Our senior notes indenture also imposes a requirement to maintain unencumbered assets (defined in the indenture as undepreciated property book value) of not less than 125% of the aggregate amount of unsecured indebtedness. This coverage requirement must be maintained at all times and is distinct from the coverage requirements necessary to incur debt or make distributions discussed above (whose consequences, where we fall below the coverage level, are limited to restricting our ability to incur new debt or make distributions, but which would not otherwise cause a default under our senior notes indenture).

We are in compliance with all of ourthe financial covenants under theapplicable to our Series D senior notes indenture.notes. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the senior notes indenture for our Series D senior notes and our actual credit ratios as of December 31, 2011:2014:  

 

Actual Ratio

Covenant Requirement

Unencumbered assets tests

348

489

%

Minimum ratio of 125

150%

Total indebtedness to total assets

31

21

%

Maximum ratio of 65

65%

Secured indebtedness to total assets

5

2

%

Maximum ratio of 45

40%

EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio

3.1x

7.3

x

Minimum ratio of 1.5x

Prior Series of Senior Notes Restrictive Covenants

Currently, our senior notes have an investment grade rating from both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. As a result, many of the restrictive covenants contained in the senior notes indenture and the supplemental indentures for our prior series of senior notes are not applicable, as they do not apply for so long as such series of notes maintain an investment grade rating from both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. The following primary covenants continue to apply to our existing senior notes (other than our Series D senior notes):

restrict our ability to sell all or substantially all of our assets or merge with or into other companies; and

require us to make an offer to repurchase the existing senior notes then currently outstanding upon the occurrence of a change of control.


If our senior notes no longer are rated investment grade by either or both of Moody's and Standard & Poor's, then the following covenants and other restrictions will be reinstated for our existing senior notes (but will not apply to the Series D senior notes which have different covenants):

our ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions will be subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions, including the achievement of an EBITDA-to­interest coverage ratio of at least 2.0x. We will be able to make distributions to enable Host Inc. to pay dividends on its preferred stock, if any, under the senior notes indenture when our EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio is above 1.7 to 1.0. This ratio is calculated in accordance with the terms of our senior notes indenture applicable to our existing senior notes based on pro forma results for the four prior fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings, as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Interest expense excludes items such as the gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisition of a loan in order to establish the debt at fair value, and, during the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately $16 million of non-cash interest, which represents interest expense recorded as a result of the implementation in 2009 of an accounting requirement relating to our outstanding Exchangeable Senior Debentures. These amounts are included in interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations;

other covenants limiting our ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions would include maintaining total indebtedness of less than 65% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values), excluding intangible assets, and maintaining secured indebtedness and subsidiary indebtedness of less than 45% of adjusted total assets. So long as we maintain the required level of interest coverage and satisfy these and other conditions in the senior notes indenture applicable to our existing senior notes, we may make preferred or common OP unit distributions and incur additional debt, including debt incurred in connection with an acquisition. Even if we are below the coverage levels otherwise required to incur debt and make distributions when our senior notes no longer are rated investment grade, we still will be permitted to incur certain types of debt, including (i) credit facility debt, (ii) refinancing debt, (iii) up to $400 million of mortgage debt, which proceeds would be used to repay debt under the credit facility (and permanently reduce our ability to borrow under the credit facility by such amount), and (iv) up to $150 million of other debt. We also will be permitted to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.'s REIT status;

a requirement to maintain unencumbered assets, based on undepreciated book values, of not less than 125% of the aggregate amount of senior note debt, plus other debt not secured by mortgages. This coverage requirement must be maintained at all times and is distinct from the coverage requirements necessary to incur debt or make distributions discussed above (which consequences, where we fall below the coverage level, are limited to restricting our ability to incur new debt or make distributions, but which would not otherwise cause a default under our senior notes indenture); and

our ability to make distributions on, redeem or repurchase our OP units; permit payment or distribution restrictions on certain of our subsidiaries; sell assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; and create certain liens will be restricted.

The following summarizes the actual credit ratios for our existing senior notes (other than the Series D senior notes) as of December 31, 2014 and the covenant requirements contained in the senior notes indenture that would be applicable at such times as our existing senior notes no longer are rated investment grade by either of Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. Even if we were to lose the investment grade rating, we would be in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the senior notes indenture:

Actual Ratio*

Covenant Requirement

Unencumbered assets tests

498

%

Minimum ratio of 125%

Total indebtedness to total assets

21

%

Maximum ratio of 65%

Secured indebtedness to total assets

2

%

Maximum ratio of 45%

EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio

7.4

x

Minimum ratio of 2.0x

*

Because of differences in the calculation methodology between our Series D senior notes and our other senior notes, our actual ratios as reported can be slightly different.  

Exchangeable Debentures.As of December 31, 2011,2014, we have three series$400 million of 2½% exchangeable senior debentures outstanding: $400 million of 2 1/2% debenturesoutstanding that were issued on December 22, 2009 (the “2009 Debentures”), $388 million of 2 5/8% debentures that were issued on March 23, 2007 (the “2007 Debentures”) and $175 million of 3 1/4% debentures that were issued on March 16, 2004 (the “2004 Debentures”). We refer to these collectively as the “Debentures.” The 2009 Debentures are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes. Holders have the right to require us to purchase the 2009 Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued interest (the “put option”) on October 15, 2015 and on certain datesother subsequent to their respective issuances.dates. Holders of the 2009 Debentures also have the right to exchange the 2009 Debentures prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock is more than 120% (for the 2004 Debentures) or 130% (for the 2007 and 2009 Debentures) of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days during certain periodsof the calendar quarter or at any time up to two days prior to the date on which the 2009 Debentures have been called for redemption. We can redeem for cash all, or part, of any of the 2009 Debentures at any time subsequent


to each of their respective redemption datesOctober 20, 2015, at a redemption price ofequal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. If, at any time, we elect to redeem the 2009 Debentures and the exchange value exceeds the cash redemption price, we would expect the holders toelect to exchange the 2009 Debentures at the respective exchange value rather than receive the cash redemption price. The exchange value is equal to the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Upon exchange, the 2004 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, the 2007 Debentures would be exchanged for a combination of cash (for the principal balance of the debentures) and Host Inc.’s common stock (for the remainder of the exchange value) and the 2009 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, cash or a combination thereof, at our option. Currently, noneAs of December 31, 2014, the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock exceeded 130% of the exchange price for more than 20 of 30 consecutive prior trading days. Therefore, the 2009 Debentures are exchangeable by holders.

The following chart details our outstandingholders through March 31, 2015. Whether the 2009 Debentures ascontinue to be exchangeable after March 31, 2015 will depend on future trading prices of December 31, 2011:

   Maturity
date
   Next put
option
date
   Redemption
date
   Outstanding
principal
amount
   Current exchange
rate for each
$1,000 of principal
   Current
equivalent
exchange price
   Exchangeable
share
equivalents
 
               (in millions)   (in shares)       (in shares) 

2009 Debentures

   10/15/2029     10/15/2015     10/20/2015    $400     71.9264    $13.90     28.8 million  

2007 Debentures

   4/15/2027     4/15/2012     4/20/2012     388     32.0239     31.23     12.4 million  

2004 Debentures

   4/15/2024     4/15/2014     4/19/2009     175     65.5744     15.25     11.5 million  
        

 

 

       

Total

        $963        
        

 

 

       

We separately accountHost Inc’s common stock. Currently, each $1,000 Debenture would be exchanged for 77.8265 Host Inc. common shares (for an equivalent per share price of $12.85), for a total of 31.1 million shares.  For additional detail on the liability and equity components of our exchangeable debentures in order to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, for the Debentures, we record the liability components thereof at fair value as of the date of issuance and amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense over the expected life of the debt; however, there is no effect on our cash interest payments. We measured the fair value of the debt componentsinitial valuation of the 2009 Debentures 2007and the related interest expense, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 4. Debt – Exchangeable Debentures and 2004 Debentures at issuance based on effective interest rates of 6.9%, 6.5% and 6.8%, respectively. As a result, we attributed $247 million of the proceeds received to the conversion feature of the Debentures. This amount represents the excess proceeds received over the fair value of the debt at the date of issuance and is included in Host Inc.’s additional paid-in capital and Host L.P.’s partner’s capital on the consolidated balance sheets. The following chart details the initial allocations between the debt and equity components of the debentures, net of the original issue discount, based on the effective interest rate at the time of issuance, as well as the debt balances at December 31, 2011 (in millions):.”

   Initial Face
Amount
   Initial
Liability
Value
   Initial Equity
Value
   Face Amount
Outstanding at
12/31/2011
   Debt Carrying
Value at
12/31/2011
   Unamortized
Discount at
12/31/2011
 

2009 Debentures

  $400    $316    $82    $400    $342    $58  

2007 Debentures

   600     502     89     388     385     3  

2004 Debentures

   500     413     76     175     175     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,500    $1,231    $247    $963    $902    $61  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense recorded for the Debentures for the periods presented consists of the following (in millions):

   2011   2010   2009 

Contractual interest expense (cash)

  $31    $34    $26  

Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization

   31     32     27  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  $62    $66    $53  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit Facility. On November 22, 2011,June 27, 2014, we entered into a new senior revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and The Bank of Nova Scotia as co-documentation agents, and certain other agents and lenders. The new credit facility replaces our existing senior revolving credit facility which would have expired in September 2012. The new credit facility allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, including a foreign currency subfacility for Canadian Dollars,dollars, Australian Dollars,dollars, New Zealand Dollars,dollars, Japanese Yen,yen, Euros, British pound sterling and, British Pounds Sterlingif available to the lenders, Mexican peso, of up to the foreign currency equivalent of $500 million, subject to a lower amount in the case of New Zealand Dollardollar and Mexican peso borrowings. The credit facility also provides a subfacility of up to $100 million for swingline borrowings in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros or British pounds sterling and a subfacility of up to $100 million for issuances of letters of credit. Host L.P. also has the option to increase the aggregate principal amount of the credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions. The credit facility has an initial scheduled maturity of November 2015,June 2018, with an option for Host L.P. to extend the term for one additional year,two six-month renewal options, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee. At December 31, 2011, wefee and the accuracy of representations and warranties.

have $883Credit Facility Term Loan. The June 2014 credit facility contained a term loan facility of $500 million, of remaining available capacitywhich replaced and refinanced the term loan under our prior facility of like amount. The term loan facility contains an option for us to increase the aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility by up to $500 million in the future, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and the satisfaction of the other conditions specified in the credit facility. The amounts that remained outstanding atterm loan facility has an initial scheduled maturity of June 2017, with two one-year renewal options, subject to certain conditions, including the time we entered intopayment of an extension fee and the newaccuracy of representations and warranties.

The term loan does not require any scheduled amortization payments prior to maturity. The term loan otherwise is subject to the same terms and conditions as those in the credit facility were transferred over to the new credit facilityregarding subsidiary guarantees and remain outstanding.pledges of security interests in subsidiaries, operational covenants, financial covenants and events of default (as discussed below).

Collateral and Guarantees.The credit facility does not initially requirecurrently include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests in our subsidiaries or any other security, and the guarantees and pledges are required only in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges would ratably benefit the credit facility, as well as the notes outstanding under Host L.P.’s senior notes indenture, interest rate and currency hedges and certain other hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. Even when triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would provide neither guarantees nor pledges of equity interests. Further, if at any time our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters or Host L.P. has an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating, such guarantees and pledges may be released.

Prepayments. Prepayments.Voluntary prepayments of the loans under the credit facility are permitted in whole or in part without premium or penalty. The loans under the credit facility are required to be prepaid in the event that asset sales reduce adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values) to below $10 billion if we do not reinvest the proceeds of those assetsasset sales in new investments.properties. At December 31, 2011,2014, we have adjusted total assets, as defined in our credit facility, of $18.7$19 billion.

Financial Covenants. The credit facility contains covenants concerning allowable leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage. Currently, weWe are permitted to make borrowings and maintain amounts outstanding under the credit facility so long as our leverage ratio is not in excess of 7.25x, our unsecured coverage ratio is not less than 1.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.25x. The financial covenants for the credit facility do not apply when there are no borrowings under the credit facility. Hence, so long as there are no amounts outstanding thereunder and the term loan is repaid, we would not be in default if we do not satisfy the financial covenants and we do not lose the potential to draw under the credit facility in the future if we were ever to regain compliance with the financial covenants. These calculations are performed based on pro forma results for the prior four fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of the credit facility, interest expense excludes items such as the gains and losses on the extinguishment of


debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisitionissuance of a loan in order to establish the debt atits fair value and non-cash interest expense due to the implementation in 2009 of accounting standards relating to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept, underpursuant to which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance.

We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the credit facility. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the credit facility as of December 31, 2011:2014:

 

Actual Ratio

Covenant Requirement

for all years

Leverage ratio

4.8x

2.6

x

Maximum ratio of 7.25x

Fixed charge coverage ratio

2.2x

5.2

x

Minimum ratio of 1.25x

Unsecured interest coverage ratio (a)(1)

3.2x

8.5

x

Minimum ratio of 1.75x

___________

(a)

(1)

If at any time our leverage ratio is above 7.0x, our minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio will be reduced to 1.5x.

Interest and Fees. We pay interest on revolver borrowings under the credit facility at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin. The margin either (i) rangingranges from 17587.5 to 275155 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio), or (ii) following the date on which Host L.P.’s long-term unsecured debt rating is investment grade and Host L.P. elects ratings-based pricing, ranging from 100 to 160 basis points (depending on Host LP’s unsecured long-term debt rating). We also pay a facility fee ranging from 12.5 to 30 basis points, depending on our rating and regardless of usage. Based on our leverage ratio atHost L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating as of December 31, 2011 of 4.8x,2014, we would beare able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. While we are using leverage-based pricing, to the extent that amounts under the credit facility remain unused, we pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the loan commitment of 25 to 35100 basis points depending on our average revolver usage during the applicable period. Upon attainment of

an investment grade unsecured debt rating and election of ratings-based pricing, in lieu of paying an unused commitment fee, we instead would pay a facility fee of 20 basis points. Interest on the term loan consists of floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1590 to 175 basis points to 40(depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on Host L.P.’s long-term debt rating as of December 31, 2014, our applicable margin on the term loan is 112.5 basis points, depending on our rating and regardlessfor an all-in interest rate of usage.1.29%.  

Other Covenants and Events of Default. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants on customary matters. Certain covenants are less restrictive at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x.6.0x, as currently is the case. In particular, at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, we will not be subject to limitations on capital expenditures, and the limitations on acquisitions, investments, dividends and distributions contained in the credit facility will be superseded by the generally less restrictive corresponding covenants in our senior notes indenture. Additionally, the credit facility’s restrictions on incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends and distributions generally are consistent with our senior notes indenture. These provisions, under certain circumstances, limit debt incurrence to debt incurred under the credit facility or in connection with a refinancing, and limit dividend payments to those necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s tax status as a REIT.

The credit facility also includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature, and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, payment of all amounts payabledue under the credit facility may be accelerated and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts payabledue under the credit facility will automatically become due and payable and the lenders’ commitments automatically will automatically terminate.

Mortgage and Other Debt. As of December 31, 2011,2014, we had 14 hotels that weremortgage debt secured by mortgage debt.10 hotels, which represent 4% of our total revenues in 2014. Substantially all of our mortgage debt is recourse solely to specific assets, except in instances of fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions. As of December 31, 2011,2014, secured debt represented approximately 17%10% of our total debt and our aggregate secured debt had an average interest rate of 5.0% and an average maturity of 2.64.3 years.


The following table summarizes our outstanding debt and scheduled amortization and maturities related to mortgage and other debt as of December 31, 20112014 (in millions):

 

   Balance as of
December 31,
2011
   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter 

Mortgage Debt

              

JW Marriott, Washington, D.C., 7.50%, due 4/2/2013 (1)

  $114    $3    $111    $—      $—      $—      $—    

Orlando World Center Marriott, 4.75%, due 7/1/2013

   246     —       246     —       —       —       —    

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort and Spa, 5.55%, due 3/1/2014

   134     —       —       134     —       —       —    

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel and Spa, 3.37%, due 3/1/2014 (2)

   312     —       —       312     —       —       —    

The Westin Denver Downtown, 8.51%, due 12/11/2023 (3)

   35     2     2     —       —       —       31  

New Zealand hotel portfolio, 5.49%, due 2/18/2016 (4)

   81     —       —       —       —       81     —    

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, 6.77%, due 11/23/2016 (5)

   84     —       —       —       —       84     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total mortgage debt

   1,006     5     359     446     —       165     31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Debt

              

Philadelphia Airport Marriott industrial revenue bonds, 7 3/4%, due 12/1/2017

   40     —       —       —       —       —       40  

Industrial revenue bonds and other (6)

   47     —       —       33     12     —       2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other debt

   87     —       —       33     12     —       42  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total mortgage and other debt

  $1,093    $5    $359    $479    $12    $165    $73  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

Thereafter

 

Mortgage Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort and Spa, 4.75%,

     due 1/1/2024

 

$

150

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

New Zealand hotel portfolio, 6.60%, due

     2/18/2016 (1)

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyatt Regency Reston, 3.26%, due 7/1/16 (2)

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, 6.20%, due

     11/23/2016 (3)

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital leases

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage debt

 

$

404

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

253

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

This floating rate mortgage is based on LIBOR plus 600 basis points, with a LIBOR floor of 1.5% and a LIBOR cap of 3%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2011.
(2)During 2009, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements for the total notional amount outstanding on this loan. The rate shown reflects the weighted average interest rate in effect at December 31, 2011. The balance reflects the book value at December 31, 2011, as adjusted, due to the implementation of fair value hedge accounting. The face amount at December 31, 2011 was $300 million.
(3)Beginning in 2013, the interest rate on this loan increases a minimum of 500 basis points and all excess cash (as defined in the loan agreement) generated by the partnership that owns this property is applied to principal; however, the loan can be repaid without a premium or penalty on that date. The amortization presented is the minimum principal payment considering the increase in interest rate, but does not include additional principal payments based on excess cash flow. We expect to repay this mortgage in 2013.
(4)

The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month New Zealand Bank Bill Rate plus 120105 basis points plus an additional commitment fee of 120105 basis points per annum. In addition, we entered into a swap agreement that fixes 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 7.15%6.85%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2011.2014.

(5)

(2)

This floating rate mortgage is based on LIBOR plus 310 basis points. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2014.

(3)

The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month BBSY plus 230 basis points. In addition, we entered into separate swap agreements that fix 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 6.7% and cap the remaining 25% at an all-in interest rate of 9.9%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2011.2014.  

(6)Industrial revenue bonds and other consist of loans with an average interest rate of 7.1% that mature through 2016, and capital leases with varying interest rates and maturity dates.

Mortgage Debt of Consolidated and Unconsolidated Partner Interests. For the entities that we consolidate in our financial statements that have third party non-controlling partnership interests, the portion of mortgage debt included in the above table that is attributable to the non-controlling interests, based on their percentage of ownership of the ventures, is approximately $67$93 million. Additionally, we have non-controlling interests in partnerships and joint ventures that are not consolidated and are accounted for under the equity method. The portion of the mortgage and other debt of these partnerships and joint ventures attributable to us, based on our percentage of ownership thereof, was $328$502 million at December 31, 2011.2014. This debt balance primarily is attributable to our approximate one-third ownership interest in the Euro JV. The mortgage debt related to the hotels owned by our Euro JV contains operating covenants that could result in the joint venture being required to escrow cash from operations or make principal repayments without penalty. The debt of all of our unconsolidated partnerships orEuropean and Asia/Pacific joint ventures is non-recourse to us.us and we have jointly and/or severally guaranteed construction loans incurred by our Maui timeshare and Hyatt Place Nashville joint ventures. See “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations.”

Distribution/Dividend Policy. Host Inc.’s policy on common dividends generally is required to distribute, at least 90%over time, 100% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gain,which primarily is dependent on our results of operations, as well as gains and losses on property sales. Host Inc. paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.06 per share on its common stock on January 15, 2015. The $0.20 per share dividend represents Host Inc.’s intended regular quarterly dividend for the next several quarters, subject to Board approval. While Host Inc. intends to use available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in its stockholders in orderportfolio, to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to whichthe extent that we do not receive cash. identify appropriate investments, it may elect in the future to use available cash for other uses, such as common stock repurchases or increased dividends, which could be in excess of taxable income. Any special dividend would be subject to approval by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends are provided through distributions from Host L.P. As of February 22, 2012,December 31, 2014, Host Inc. is the owner of approximately 98.5%99% of theHost L.P.’s common OP units. The remaining 1.5% of the common OP units are heldowned by various third-partyunaffiliated limited partners. Each OP unit may be offered for redemption by the holders thereof for cash or, at the election of Host Inc., Host Inc. common stock based on the then current conversion ratio. The current conversion ratio was adjusted from 1.0 tois 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock for each OP unit as a result of Host Inc.’s special dividend in 2009, 90% of which was paid in shares of Host Inc. common stock. This adjustment was made to avoid any unintended dilution as a result of the portion of Host Inc.’s dividend paid in common stock to its stockholders.unit.

Investors should take into account the 1.5%1% non-controlling position of Host L.P. OP units when analyzing dividend payments by Host Inc. to its stockholders, as these holders of OP units share, on a pro rata basis, in amounts being distributed by Host L.P. to holders of its corresponding OP units. For example, if Host Inc. paid a $1 per share dividend on its common stock, it would be based on the payment of a $1.021494 per common unit distribution by Host L.P. to Host Inc., as well as to the other common OP unitholders.

During 2011, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.14 per share (beginning in first quarter at $0.02 and increasing by $0.01 each quarter thereafter) on Host Inc.’s common stock. Accordingly, Host L.P. made a distribution of $0.143 per unit on its common OP units. Host Inc.’s policy on common dividends is generally to distribute, over time, 100% of its taxable income. Host Inc. intends to declare a dividend of $0.06 per share in the first quarter of 2012. The amount of any future dividend will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are party to various transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities (which we refer to as “off-balance sheet arrangements”), underpursuant to which we have certain contingent liabilities and/or guarantees. Contingencies included on our balance sheet are discussed in Part II Item 8. “Financial Statements and guarantees.Supplementary Data – Note 16. “Guarantees and Contingencies.” As of December 31, 2011,2014, we are party to the following material off-balance sheet arrangements:

European Joint Venture. We have general and limited partner interests in theThe Euro JV that consists of two separate funds, with our partners being APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). We serve as the general partner for the joint venture and have a combined general and limited partner interest of 32.1% ownership interest inof Euro JV Fund I and a combined 33.4% interest inof Euro JV Fund II. Due to the ownership structure and substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partners, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditureexpenditures budgets, itthe Euro JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. As of December 31, 2011,2014, the aggregate sizetotal assets of the Euro JV isare approximately €1.3€1.9 billion ($1.72.3 billion).

Our investment and partners’ funding as of December 31, 2014 is approximately €140 million ($182 million), of whichas follows:

 

 

Host's Net Investment

 

 

Total Partner Funding

 

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

 

US$

(in millions)

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

 

% of Total Commitment

 

Euro JV Fund I

 

165

 

 

$

199

 

 

647

 

 

 

94

%

Euro JV Fund II

 

 

123

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

364

 

 

 

81

%

 

 

288

 

 

$

348

 

 

1,011

 

 

 

 

 

The partners expect to utilize the remaining commitment for Euro JV Fund I is approximately €109 million ($141 million)for capital expenditures and financing needs. In June 2014, the Euro JV partners executed an amendment and restatement of the Euro JV partnership agreement which allows contributions to the joint venture in the form of loans, as opposed to only equity contributions. Effective June 27, 2014, the Euro JV partners also amended the agreement to extend the commitment period for Euro JV Fund II is approximately €31 million ($41 million).by one year to June 27, 2015. The commitment period of Euro JV Fund I currently expires in December 2015. As general partner,asset manager of the Euro JV funds, we earn aan asset management fee based on the amount of equity commitments and equity investments. In 2011, 2010invested, which in 2014, 2013 and 2009, we recorded2012 were approximately $11$16 million, $5$15 million and $6$13 million, of management fees, respectively.

AsThe following table sets forth operating statistics for the Euro JV comparable hotels as of December 31, 2011, the partners have funded approximately €487 million, or 90%,2014 and 2013:

 

 

Comparable Euro JV Hotels in Constant Euros (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 to 2014

 

Average room rate

 

182.05

 

 

179.92

 

 

 

1.2

%

Average occupancy

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

76.5

%

 

 

100

bps

RevPAR

 

141.13

 

 

137.68

 

 

 

2.5

%

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The presentation above includes the operating performance for the 17 properties consisting of 5,612 rooms in the joint venture with comparable results. The table excludes one hotel acquired in each of 2014 and 2013 as the Euro JV did not own each hotel for the entirety of the periods presented. See “-Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

The operating statistics of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I and expect to utilizehotels are presented in constant Euros, the remainder for capital expenditures and financing needs. On June 27, 2011, the Euro JV was expanded through the creation of Euro JV Fund II, in which each of the partners holds a 33.3% limited partner interest and we hold the 0.1% general partner interest. The Euro JV Fund II has a target size of €450 million of new equity and a target investment of approximately €1 billion, after taking into account anticipated debt. As part of the expansion, we transferred to Euro JV Fund II the Le Méridien Piccadilly at a price of £64 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. In addition to the expansion of the capacityfunctional currency of the Euro JV, we have extendedin order to present the results of the hotels without the effects of foreign currency exchange rates. The functional currency of the hotels owned in the United Kingdom and Poland are the British pound sterling and the Polish zloty, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, RevPAR in constant Euros for the Euro JV increased by 2.5%, driven primarily by strength in transient business. Additionally, food and beverage revenues for the Euro JV comparable properties increased approximately 5.1% in 2014.

For 2014, 2013 and 2012 our portion of the earnings (losses) of the Euro JV were $21 million, $(12) million and $4 million, respectively, and are included in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates on our statements of operations. The loss in 2013 includes our portion of a €33 million ($46 million) impairment expense related to the Sheraton Roma Hotel & Conference Center. The Euro JV analyzes its termproperties for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. A property is considered to be impaired when the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows over its remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying amount of the asset. If a property is impaired, an expense is recorded for the


difference between the fair value and the net carrying amount of the hotel. We also reviewed our investment in the Euro JV for other-than-temporary impairment and determined that no additional impairment expense was considered necessary in 2014 or 2013.

Cash flows from 2016operating activities of the Euro JV were €69 million, €36 million and €35 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In April 2014, the Euro JV made a cash distribution to 2021, subjectits partners totaling €37 million, of which Host’s share was €12 million ($17 million). No similar distribution was made in 2013 or 2012. Subsequent to two one-year extensions.year end, in February 2015, the Euro JV distributed an additional €10 million to its partners, of which Host’s share was €3 million ($4 million). Future cash flows from operations primarily are expected to continue to be used to invest in the portfolio through capital expenditures and to fund other investments, but also may result in distributions to partners. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Euro JV invested approximately €21 million, €32 million and €29 million, respectively, in capital expenditures projects. The Euro JV expects to spend between €20 million and €30 million on capital expenditures in 2015, none of which capital expenditures are expected to require additional partner contributions.  

On September 30, 2011, 2014, the Euro JV Fund II acquired a 90% ownership interest in the 396-room Pullman Bercy, Paris, for394-room Grand Hotel Esplanade in Berlin. The hotel was acquired based on an aggregate gross value of €81 million ($102 million), and is subject to approximately €96€48 million including certain acquisition costs($61 million) of €6 million anddebt with a €52.6 million mortgage loan.margin of 219 basis points over Euribor, which debt is non-recourse to the partners of the Euro JV. We contributed €15approximately €10 million ($2014 million) to the Euro JV to financein connection with this acquisition, partially funded through a draw on our portion ofcredit facility. In January 2015, the acquisition. Thehotel was repositioned as the Sheraton Berlin Grand Hotel Esplanade.

On October 16, 2014, the Euro JV Fund II will invest an additional €9I sold the 350-room Sheraton Skyline Hotel & Conference Centre for £33 million ($53 million). The proceeds were used to renovaterepay the rooms£21 million (€26.5 million) mortgage loan secured by the property, and public space at€15.5 million of mortgage debt secured by other Euro JV properties that were cross collateralized with the hotel.Sheraton Skyline.

The Euro JV has €786€980 million ($1,186 million) of mortgage debt, all of which is non-recourse to us and aus. A default under these loansof the Euro JV mortgage debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. In 2010,On July 3, 2014, the Euro JV negotiated various agreementsrefinanced the €69 million ($94 million) loan secured by three properties in Brussels with Natixis, reducing the lendersoutstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan to €47.8 million using funds provided by the partners. Interest on the new loan is a significantcombination of fixed and floating for an initial all-in rate of 2.0% and has a maturity date of July 3, 2019.    

The following presents our portion of thisthe Euro JV debt in order to cure actual or potential covenant defaults, cash sweeps, or non-payment defaults that expire throughout 2012. The €341 million mortgage secured by a portfoliomaturities as of six hotels located in Spain, Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom and the £32 million mortgage secured by Le Méridien Piccadilly mature in 2013. Additionally, the €53 million mortgage secured by the Amsterdam hotel matures in 2013, but has two one-year extension options, subject to small fees and certain financial covenants. Due to the difficult economic climate in Europe, the refinancing options may be limited and we expect that lenders may require more stringent financial covenants, higher rates of interest and lower loan-to-value ratios on future loans, which would require an equity contribution or debt paydowns with the proceeds from asset sales to reduce the loan principal balance.December 31, 2014:    

We have entered into fivefour foreign currency forward sale contracts in order to hedge the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the Euro JV. We have hedged €100 million (approximately $140 million) of our investment and theThe forward purchases will occur between October 2012August 2015 and August 2015. During 2011May 2017. We have hedged €177 million (approximately $228 million) of our investment through these contracts and 2010, we recorded approximately $2 million and $5 million, respectively, related to the changedesignated draws under our credit facility in the fair value of the forward sale contracts to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The current value of the forward contracts of $9 million is included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheet. The derivatives are considered a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, and, in accordance with applicable hedge accounting guidance, are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Host Inc.’s stockholders’ equity portion and Host L.P.’s partners’ capital portion of their balance sheets.Euros. For additional detail on the foreign currency forward sale contracts and our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, see “ItemPart II Item 7A. “—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

AsianAsia/Pacific Joint Venture.We have a 25% interest in the AsianAsia/Pacific JV which is structured as a Singapore Corporation with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE, to explore investment opportunities in various markets throughout Asia andRE. The agreement may be terminated by either partner at any time after March 2015, which would trigger the Pacific region. The initial termliquidation of the Asian JV is for a period of seven years.along with the assets within the JV. Due to the ownership structure and the substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited


partner, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditureexpenditures budgets, the AsianAsia/Pacific JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. The commitment period for equity contributions to the AsianAsia/Pacific JV expiresexpired in March 2012. We dodid not plan to extend the commitment period beyond the current expiration date; however, as we will continue to explore opportunities to invest in Asia, with our strategic partners.we may offer GIC RE opportunities to participate in certain acquisitions through the existing joint venture or through a new joint venture.

During 2011,As of December 31, 2014, the AsianAsia/Pacific JV owns one hotel in Australia and the partners have invested approximately $53$83 million (of which our share was $13.3$21 million) of its $65 million commitment to acquirein a 36% interest of aseparate joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited.Limited, in which the Asia/Pacific JV holds a 36% interest. This joint venture is developing seven properties in India, totaling approximately 1,750 rooms, two of which opened in three major citiesBangalore in India, Bengaluru,2012, one of which opened in Chennai in 2014 and four of which are under various stages of development in Chennai and Delhi. The hotels currently are and will be managed by Accor under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands.

Maui Joint Venture. We have a 67% ownership in a joint venture with an affiliate of Hyatt Residential Group, a subsidiary of Interval Leisure Group, (the “Maui JV”) to develop, sell and operate a 131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. Our ownership is a non-controlling interest as a result of the significant economic rights held by the Interval member, which also is the managing member. The first two hotelsproject opened in December 2014 with total development costs to date of $180 million. The total estimated development costs are expected to be fully opened by March of 2012.

Hospitality Properties Trust. We own$200 million, which is partially being funded with a leasehold interest in 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties,$110 million construction loan, which properties were sold to Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”)is jointly and leased back to us in 1995 and 1996. In conjunction with our conversion to a REIT, we entered into subleases with Barceló Crestline for these 53 properties, as well as 18 Residence Inn by Marriott properties. In June 2010, HPT sent notices of default because the subtenants failed to meet net worth covenants, which would have triggered an event of defaultseverally guaranteed by us underand Hyatt Hotels Corporation, and with member contributions. As of December 31, 2014, $86 million was outstanding on the leases between usconstruction loan. Our total investment in the Maui JV is approximately $87 million, which as of December 31, 2014 includes contributions of land valued at $36 million, $8 million in pre-formation expenditures and HPT.additional capital contributions of $43 million. As a result,of December 31, 2014, the Maui JV has recognized $54 million in sales of timeshare units for which we terminated the subleases effective July 6, 2010 and we resumed acting as owner under the management agreements. Effective upon terminationhave recognized earnings of $7 million in 2014, including our share of the subleases, we recorded the operationssales, net of the hotels as opposed to rental income in 2010 and 2011. On December 30, 2011, we entered into a settlement with Barceló Crestline, who had guaranteed rent payments to HPT as part of the sublease, related to the termination of the subleases, which resulted in an additional $7 million of income being recorded in 2011 to compensate us forcosts, a portion of the deferred gain on the contribution of the land and our share of development fees. The book value of our investment in the Maui JV is $61 million.  

Hyatt Place Joint Venture. On November 12, 2013, we opened the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee, which was developed for $43 million through a joint venture, in which we are a 50% partner, with White Lodging Services. The joint venture has a $34.8 million construction loan for this project, and as of December 31, 2014, $31 million was outstanding on this facility. Along with White Lodging Services, we have jointly and severally guaranteed the payment of the loan. We invested approximately $6 million for our investment in the joint venture. Due to the significant control rights of our partner, we do not consolidate the joint venture in our financial statements.

For additional discussion on each of our joint venture investments see Part II Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 3. “Investments in Affiliates.”

Contractual Obligations. The table below summarizes our obligations for principal and estimated interest payments on our debt, future minimum lease payments on our operating losses subsequent to the sublease termination.

We terminated the master lease with HPT on the 18 Residence Inn properties effectiveand capital leases, projected capital expenditures and other long-term liabilities, each as of December 31, 2010 and received $17.2 million of deferred proceeds related to the initial sale and additional amounts held in the tenant collection account. On November 23, 2010, we gave notice that we will not extend the lease on the 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties, which will result in termination of the lease effective December 31, 2012. At the expiration of the lease, HPT is obligated to pay us deferred proceeds related to the initial sale of approximately $51 million, subject to damages arising out of an event of default, if any, under the lease plus additional amounts held in a tenant collection account.2014 (in millions):

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Long-term debt obligations (1)

 

$

5,006

 

 

$

583

 

 

$

1,054

 

 

$

969

 

 

$

2,400

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

1,788

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

1,572

 

Purchase obligations (2)

 

 

522

 

 

 

419

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet (3)

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

Total

 

$

7,336

 

 

$

1,049

 

 

$

1,255

 

 

$

1,051

 

 

$

3,981

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts shown include amortization of principal, debt maturities and estimated interest payments. Interest payments have been included in this category based on the weighted average interest rate.

(2)

Our only purchase obligations consist of commitments for capital expenditures at our hotels. Under our contracts, we have the ability to defer some of these expenditures into later years.

(3)

The amounts shown include deferred management fees and the estimated amount of tax expense. Under terms of our management agreements, we have deferred payment of management fees to our hotel managers for some of our properties that have not achieved the required income thresholds for payment of owner’s priority to us. The timing of the payments, if any, is based on future operations, the termination of the management agreement or the sale of the hotel, and is, therefore, not determinable. The estimated amount of tax expense relates to uncertain tax liabilities.


Tax Sharing Arrangements. Under tax sharing agreements with former affiliated companies (such as Marriott International, Inc., HMS Host and Barceló Crestline Corporation), we are obligated to pay certain taxes (federal, state, local and foreign, including any related interest and penalties) relating to periods in which the companies were affiliated with us. For example, a taxing authority could adjust an item deducted by a former affiliate during the period that this former affiliate was owned by us. This adjustment could produce a tax liability that we may be obligated to pay under the tax sharing agreement. Additionally, under the partnership agreement between Host Inc. and Host L.P., Host L.P. is obligated to pay certain taxes (federal, state, local and foreign, including any related interest and penalties) incurred by Host Inc., as well as any liabilities the IRS may successfully assert against Host Inc. We do not expect any amounts paid under these tax sharing arrangements to be material.

Tax Indemnification Agreements. As a result of certain federal and state income tax considerations of the former owners of two hotels currently owned by Host LP,L.P., we have agreed to restrictions on selling such hotels, or repaying or refinancing the mortgage debt, for varying periods. One of these agreements expires in 2028 and the other in 2031.

GuaranteesGuarantees. We have entered into certain guarantees, which consist of commitments we have made to third parties for leases or debt, that are not recorded on our books due to various dispositions, spin-offs and contractual arrangements, but that we have agreed to pay in the event of certain circumstances, including default by an unrelated party. We consider the likelihood of any material payments under these guarantees to be remote. TheFor a discussion of the largest guarantees (by dollar amount) are listed below:

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $14 million as of December 31, 2011.

In 1997, we owned Leisure Park Venture Limited Partnership, which currently ownssee “Item 8. Financial Statements and operates a senior living facility. We no longer have an ownership interest in the partnership, but remain obligated under a guarantee of interest and principal with respect to $14.7 million of municipal bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority through their maturity in 2027. However, to the extent we are required to make any payments under the guarantee, we have been indemnified by Barceló Crestline Corporation, who, in turn, is indemnified by the current owner of the facility.

In connection with the sale of two hotels in January 2005, we remain contingently liable for the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $13 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that any liability related to these ground leases is remote and, in each case, we have been indemnified by the purchaser of the hotel.

Information on other guarantees and other off-balance sheet arrangements may be found inSupplementary Data - Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Guarantees16. Guarantees and Contingencies.”

Contractual Obligations. The table below summarizes our obligations for principal and estimated interest payments on our debt, future minimum lease payments on our operating and capital leases, projected capital expenditures and other long-term liabilities, each as of December 31, 2011 (in millions):

   Payments due by period 
   Total   Less than
1 year
   1 to 3 years   3 to 5 years   More than
5 years
 

Long-term debt obligations (1)

  $7,252    $748    $2,125    $2,512    $1,867  

Capital lease obligations

   2     1     1     —       —    

Operating lease obligations

   1,660     113     88     80     1,379  

Purchase obligations (2)

   573     374     199     —       —    

Other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet (3)

   17     —       5     —       12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $9,504    $1,236    $2,418    $2,592    $3,258  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The amounts shown include amortization of principal, debt maturities and estimated interest payments. Interest payments have been included in this category based on the weighted average interest rate.
(2)Our only purchase obligations consist of commitments for capital expenditures at our hotels. Under our contracts, we have the ability to defer some of these expenditures into later years.
(3)The amounts shown include deferred management fees and the estimated amount of tax expense. Under terms of our management agreements, we have deferred payment of management fees to our hotel managers for some of our properties that have not achieved the required income thresholds for payment of owner’s priority to us. The timing of the payments, if any, is based on future operations, the termination of the management agreement or the sale of the hotel, and is, therefore, not determinable. The estimated amount of tax expense relates to uncertain tax liabilities from prior years.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to the impairment of long-lived assets, on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. TheFor a detailed discussion of the following represent certain critical accounting policies that require us to exercise our business judgment or make significant estimates.estimates see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:”

·

Business Combinations;

·

Property and Equipment – Impairment testing;

·

Property and Equipment – Other-than-Temporary Impairment of an Investment;

·

Property and Equipment – Classification of Assets as “Held for Sale”;

·

Depreciation and Amortization Expense;

·

Derivative Instruments;

·

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation;

·

Foreign Currency Translation;  

·

Income Taxes – Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. Additionally, see  “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 6. Income Taxes” for more information; and

·

Share based payments. Additionally, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 8. Employee Stock Plans” for more information.

Application of New Accounting Standards

Hotels Acquired inIn April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360) - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposal of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08 Reporting for Discontinued Operations”). Under this standard, a Business Combination. We record our investments in hotel properties based on the fair valuedisposal of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at acquisition date. Property and equipment are recorded at fair value and allocated to buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment using appraisals and valuations performed by management and independent third parties. Fair values are based on the exit price (i.e. the price that would be received to sella component of an assetentity or transfer a liability ingroup of components of an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date). We evaluate several factors, including market data for similar assets, expected cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates and replacement cost for the assets to determine an appropriate exit cost when evaluating the fair value of our assets.

Other items that we evaluate in a business combination include identifiable intangible assets, capital lease assets and obligations and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets are typically assumed contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. Above-market and below-market contract values are based on the present value of the difference between contractual amountsentity is required to be paid pursuant to the contracts acquired and our estimate of the fair value of contract rates for corresponding contracts measured over the period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the contract. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related agreements. Capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest are measured at fair value and included as debt on the accompanying balance sheet and we record the corresponding right-to-use assets. Classification of a lease does not change if it is part of a business combination. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we may utilize a number of sources that may be obtainedreported in connection with the acquisition or financing of a property and other market data, including third-party appraisals and valuations. In certain situations, a deferred tax liability may be created due to the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of the asset at the acquisition date. Any consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired would be recorded to goodwill. In very limited circumstances, we may record a bargain purchase gaindiscontinued operations only if the consideration paid is less than the net fair value ofdisposal represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.  In addition, it requires an entity to present, for each comparative period, the assets and liabilities acquired. Furthermore, acquisition-related costs, such as due diligence, legalof a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and accounting fees, are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair valueliability sections, respectively, of the acquired assets.

Impairment Testing.We analyze our assets for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying values thereof may not be recoverable. We consider a property to be impaired when the sumstatement of future undiscounted cash flows over our remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying value of the asset. For impaired assets, we record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the property’s carrying value over its fair value. To the extent that a property has a substantial remaining estimated useful life and management does not believe that it is more likely than not the property will be disposed of prior to the end of its useful life, it would be unusual for undiscounted cash flows to be insufficient to recover the property’s carrying value. In the absence of other factors, we assume that the estimated life is equal to the GAAP depreciable life because of the continuous property maintenance and improvement capital expenditures required under our management agreements. We adjust our assumptions with respect to the remaining useful life of the property if situations dictate otherwise, such as an expiring ground lease, or it is more likely than not that the asset will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life. We also consider the effect of regular renewal and replacement capital expenditures on the estimable life of our properties, including critical infrastructure, which is regularly maintained and then replaced at the end of its useful life.

We test for impairment in several situations, including when a property has a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other events, trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred and the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of the impairment of our assets, we make many assumptions and estimates, including:

projected cash flows, both from operations and the eventual disposition;

expected useful life and holding period;

future required capital expenditures; and

fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates and comparable selling prices.

While we consider all of the above indicators as a preliminary indicator to determine if the carrying value may not be recovered by undiscounted cash flows, we reviewed the actual year-to-date and the projected cash flows from operations to identify properties with actual or projected annual operating losses or minimal operating profit as of December 31, 2011. The projected cash flows consider items such as booking pace, occupancy, room rate and property-level operating costs.financial position. As a result, of our review, we identified six properties that required further consideration of property and market specific conditions or factors to determine if the property was impaired using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. Management considered a range of RevPAR and operating margins compared to prior years’ operating results in evaluatingoperations through the projected cash flows from operations. To appropriately evaluate if the carrying value


date of the assets was recoverable, we projected a growth rate such that the individual properties would return to normalized levels of operations within five yearsdisposal and thereafter grow at a stabilized rate of 3% over the remaining estimable lives of the properties. This stabilized growth rate is lower than the projected growth rate for the urban upper upscale properties, which we believe is most representative of our portfolio, over the period from 2010 through 2020. Based on this test, no properties exhibited an impaired value at December 31, 2011. For purposes of this test, if we had assumed a growth rate of 0% after the return to normalized levels of operations, none of the six properties identified above would have required further analysis. Management believes its assumptions and estimates reflect current market conditions. During 2011, we recognized impairment expense in the aggregate amount of $8 million on two properties based on a change in their estimated hold periods. One of the properties was disposed of in 2011.

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of an Investment. We review our equity method investments for other-than-temporary impairment based on the occurrence of any triggering events that would indicate that the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. Triggering events can include a decline in distributable cash flows from the investment, a change in the expected hold period or other significant events which would decrease the value of the investment. Our investments primarily consist of joint ventures which own hotel properties; therefore, we generally will have few observable inputs and will determine the fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the investment, as well as considering the impact of other elements (i.e. control premiums, etc.). We use certain inputs, such as available third-party appraisals and forecast net operating income for the hotel properties, to estimate the expected cash flows. If an equity method investment is impaired, a loss is recorded for the difference between its fair value and its carrying value. Based on this test, no other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011.

Classification of Assets as “Held for Sale.” Our policy for the classification of a hotel as held for sale is intended to ensure that the sale of the asset is probable prior to classifying it as such, will be completed within one year and that actions required to complete the sale are unlikely to change or that it is unlikely the planned sale will not occur. This policy is consistent with our experience with real estate transactions under which the timing and final terms of a sale are frequently not known until purchase agreements are executed, the buyer has a significant deposit at risk and no financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner. Specifically, we typically will classify properties that we are actively marketing as held for sale when all of the following conditions are met:

Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has approved the sale (to the extent that the dollar amount of the sale requires Board approval);

a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed;

the buyer has committed a significant amount of non-refundable cash; and

no significant contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner.

To the extent that a property is classified as held for sale and its fair value less selling costs is lower than the net book value of the property, we will record an impairment loss.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets and amortization expense for leasehold improvements is based on the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. The lives of the assets are based on a number of assumptions, including cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish the assets, as well as specific market and economic conditions. While management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) or the gain or loss on the sale of anyproperties will be included in continuing operations, unless the sale represents a strategic shift. We adopted this standard as of our hotels.January 1, 2014. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.

ValuationIn May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which affects virtually all aspects of Deferred Tax Assets.an entity’s revenue recognition.  The core principle of the new standard is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  We have approximately $125 million, netnot yet completed our assessment of a valuation allowancethe effect of $47 million, of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2011. The objective of financial accounting and reporting standards for income taxes is to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in a company’snew standard on our financial statements, including possible transition alternatives.

Our Customers

Our customers fall into three broad groups: transient business, group business and contract business. Similar to the majority of the lodging industry, we further categorize business within these broad groups based on characteristics they have in common as follows:

Transient business broadly represents individual business or tax returns. We have considered various factors, including future reversalsleisure travelers. Business travelers make up the majority of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies in determining a valuation allowance fortransient demand at our deferred tax assets, and we believe that it is more likely than not thathotels. Therefore, we will be able to realize the $125 million of net deferred tax assetssignificantly more affected by trends in the future. When a determination is made that all, or a portion,business travel than trends in leisure demand. The four key subcategories of the deferred tax assetstransient business group are:

Retail: This is the benchmark rate that a hotel publishes and offers to the general public. It typically is the rate charged to travelers that do not have access to negotiated or discounted rates. It includes the “rack rate,” which typically is applied to rooms during high demand periods and is the highest rate category available. Retail room rates will fluctuate more freely depending on anticipated demand levels (e.g. seasonality and weekday vs. weekend stays).  

Non-Qualified Discount: These include special rates offered by the hotels, including packages, advance-purchase discounts and promotional offers.  These also include rooms booked through online travel agencies (OTAs).  

Special Corporate: This is a negotiated rate offered to companies and organizations that provide significant levels of room night demand to the hotel or to hotel brands generally. These rates typically are negotiated annually at a discount to the anticipated retail rate.  In addition, this category includes rates offered at the prevailing per diem for approved government travel.

Qualified Discount: This category encompasses all discount programs, such as AAA and AARP discounts, rooms booked through wholesale channels, frequent guest program redemptions, and promotional rates and packages offered by a hotel.

Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. The three key sub-categories of the group business category are:

Association: group business related to national and regional association meetings and conventions.

Corporate: group business related to corporate meetings (e.g., product launches, training programs, contract negotiations, and presentations).

Other: group business predominately related to social, military, education, religious, fraternal and youth and amateur sports teams, otherwise known as SMERF business.

Contract business refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand for our airport hotels. Additionally, contract rates may not be realized, an increaseutilized by hotels that are located in income tax expense would be recorded inmarkets that period.

Valuation of Derivative Contracts. We occasionally will enter into derivative products, including interest rate and foreign currency swaps, caps and collars. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We estimate the fair value of these instruments through the use of third party valuations, which utilize the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future cash receipts and the discounted future expected cash payments. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. The variable cash flow streams are based on an expectation of future interest and exchange rates derived from observed market interest and exchange rate curves. The values of these instruments will change over time as cash receipts and payments are made and as market conditions change. Any event that impacts the level of actual and expected future interest or exchange rates will impact our valuations. The fair value of our derivatives is likely to fluctuate from year-to-year based on changingexperiencing consistently lower levels of interest and exchange rates and shortening terms to maturity.demand.

Stock Compensation. We recognize costs resulting from Host Inc.’s share-based payment transactions over their vesting periods. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services as either equity awards or liability awards. The classification of Host Inc.’s restricted stock awards as either an equity award or a liability award is based upon cash settlement options. Equity classified awards are measured based on the fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. Awards are classified as liability awards to the extent that settlement features allow the recipient to have a percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet tax withholding requirements. The value of these restricted stock awards, less estimated forfeitures, is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services.

During 2009, Host Inc. implemented an employee stock plan for our senior management that covered the period 2009-2011 and included the following awards:

Restricted stock awards with vesting based on market conditions. These awards vest based on the total shareholder return relative to other REITs and lodging companies. They are classified as liability awards due to their cash settlement features and are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. We utilize a simulation, or Monte Carlo model, to determine the fair value of Host Inc.’s restricted stock awards with vesting based on market conditions. The utilization of this model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of Host Inc.’s common stock, risk-free interest rates, the risk profile of our common shares compared to our peer group and the amount of Host Inc.’s awards expected to be forfeited.

Restricted stock awards with vesting based on performance conditions. These awards are earned based on the employee achieving a specified performance target, which will be based on the employee’s specific management business objectives. Compensation cost will be recognized when the achievement of the performance condition is considered probable. If a performance condition has more than one outcome that is probable, recognition of compensation cost will be based on the condition that is the most likely outcome. These awards are classified as liability awards due to their cash settlement provisions. Therefore, the value of the shares to be issued by Host Inc. will be based on Host Inc.’s share price on the reporting date.

Stock option awards. The stock option awards are equity classified awards, as they do not include cash settlement features. Therefore, the value of the award is determined on the grant date using a binomial pricing model and is not adjusted for future changes in fair value. Vesting for these awards is based on service conditions. The utilization of the binomial model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of our common stock, risk-free interest rates and the amount of our awards expected to be forfeited.

On January 20, 2012, the Compensation Policy Committee of the Board of Directors adopted a new compensation plan for senior management (the “2012 Plan”), which plan replaces the expired compensation program discussed above. Components of the 2012 Plan include cash bonuses based on corporate and employee performance measures and grants of restricted stock that vest based on market conditions (total stockholder return relative to the NAREIT Equity Index, the S&P 500 Index, and select hospitality companies that serve as relevant industry/asset-specific competitors for capital) and performance conditions (employee’s specific management business objectives), as well as the issuance of stock options.

Consolidation Policies. Judgment is required with respect to the consolidation of partnership and joint venture entities in terms of the evaluation of control, including assessment of the importance of rights and privileges of the partners based on voting rights, as well as financial interests that are not controllable through voting interests. We consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the subsidiary. For those partnerships and joint ventures of which we are the general partner, we review the rights of the limited partners to determine if those rights would preclude the assumption of control as the general partner. Limited partner rights which would preclude presumption of control by the general partner include the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove us, as the general partner, without cause and substantive participating rights, primarily through voting rights.

We also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they should be considered variable interest entities (“VIEs”). If a subsidiary is a VIE, it is subject to the consolidation framework specifically for VIEs. We consider an entity a VIE if equity investors own an interest therein that does not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, we reviewed our subsidiaries and affiliates to determine if (i) they should be considered VIEs, and (ii) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in their characteristics.

Foreign Currency Translation.The operations of foreign subsidiaries are maintained in their functional currency, which generally is the local currency, and are translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates for the period. The assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the functional currency of each entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured at period end exchange rates. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives, except when deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as qualifying net investment hedges.

Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics

WeTo facilitate a year-to-year comparison of our operations, we present certain operating statistics (i.e., RevPAR, average daily rate and average occupancy) and operating results (revenues, expenses, hotel EBITDA and adjusted operating profit)associated margins) for the periods included in this report on a comparable hotel basis.basis to enable our investors to better evaluate our operating performance.


Because these statistics and operating results relate only to our hotel properties, they exclude results for our non-hotel properties and other real estate investments. We define our comparable hotels as properties (i) properties:

(i)

that are owned or leased by us and the operations of which are included in our consolidated results, whether as continuing operations or discontinued operations, for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared; and

(ii)

that have not sustained substantial property damage or business interruption, or undergone large-scale capital projects (as further defined below) during the reporting periods being compared.

The hotel business is capital-intensive and renovations are a regular part of the business. Generally, hotels under renovation remain comparable hotels. A large scale capital project that would cause a hotel to be excluded from our comparable hotel set is an extensive renovation of several core aspects of the hotel, such as rooms, meeting space, lobby, bars, restaurants and other public spaces. Both quantitative and qualitative factors are taken into consideration in determining if the renovation would cause a hotel to be removed from the comparable hotel set, including unusual or exceptional circumstances such as: a reduction or increase in room count, rebranding, a significant alteration of the business operations, or the closing of the hotel during the renovation.

We do not include an acquired hotel in our comparable hotel set until the operating results for that hotel have been included in our consolidated results whether as continuing operations or discontinued operations for one full calendar year. For example, we acquired the entiretyHyatt Place Waikiki Beach in May of 2013. The hotel will not be included in our comparable hotel set until January 1, 2015. Hotels that we sell are excluded from the reporting periods being compared, and (ii)comparable hotel set once the transaction has closed. Similarly, hotels are excluded from our comparable hotel set from the date that have not sustainedthey sustain substantial property damage or business interruption or undergonecommence a large-scale capital project. In each case, these hotels are returned to the comparable hotel set when the operations of the hotel have been included in our consolidated results for one full calendar year after completion of the repair of the property damage or cessation of the business interruption, or the completion of large-scale capital projects, during the reporting periods being compared.as applicable.

Of the 121114 hotels that we owned on December 31, 2011, 1042014, 106 have been classified as comparable hotels.

The operating results of the following hotels that we owned or leased as of December 31, 20112014 are excluded from comparable hotel results for these periods:

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (acquired in April 2011)

Novotel Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico and ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico (opened in the fourth quarter of 2014);

New York Helmsley Hotel (acquired in March 2011)

YVE Hotel Miami (acquired as the b2 miami downtown hotel in August 2014);

Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (acquired in March 2011)

Axiom Hotel (acquired as the Powell Hotel in January 2014);

The portfolio of seven hotels in New Zealand (acquired in February 2011)

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples, removed in the third quarter of 2013 (business interruption due to the closure of the hotel during extensive renovations that were substantially completed in October 2013, including renovations of 450 rooms, including 35 suites, restaurant, façade and windows);

JW Marriott, Rio de Janeiro (acquired in September 2010)

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach (acquired in May 2013);

W New York, Union Square (acquired in September 2010);

Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square (business interruption due to the closure of the hotel following an earthquake in February 2011 and the subsequent extensive renovations, which hotel reopened in August 2013); and

Westin Chicago River North (acquired in August 2010);

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center (business interruption due to significant renovations);

Chicago Marriott O’Hare (business interruption due to significant renovations);

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing (business interruption due to significant renovations); and

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina (business interruption due to significant renovations)

Orlando World Center Marriott, removed in the third quarter of 2012 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were substantially completed in July 2013, including façade restoration, the shutdown of the main pool and a complete restoration and enhancement of the hotel, including new water slides and activity areas, new pool dining facilities and the renovation of one tower of guestrooms, meeting space and restaurants).

The operating results of the Le Méridien Piccadilly, which was transferred to the Euro JV Fund II, and of the threeten hotels we disposed of in 20112014 and 2010, as well as the 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties leased from HPT,2013 are not included in comparable hotel results for the periods presented herein. Moreover, because these statistics and

As of December 31, 2013, 105 of our 115 hotels were classified as comparable. The operating results relate to ourof the following hotels that we owned or leased as of December 31, 2013 are excluded from comparable hotel properties, they exclude results for our non-hotel properties and other real estate investments.these periods:

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples;

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach;

Grand Hyatt Washington (acquired in July 2012);

The Westin New York Grand Central (business interruption due to re-branding of the hotel and extensive renovations that were substantially completed by December 2012, including the renovation of 774 guest rooms, lobby, public and meeting spaces, fitness center, restaurant and bar);

Two hotels in Christchurch, New Zealand (business interruption due to the closure of the hotels following an earthquake in February 2011 and the subsequent extensive renovations, which hotels reopened August 2013 and September 2012);


Orlando World Center Marriott;

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center, removed in the third quarter of 2011 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were completed in April 2012, including renovation of the guest rooms, lobby, bar and restaurant and the demolition of one tower of the hotel);

Chicago Marriott O’Hare, removed in the third quarter of 2011 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were completed in April 2012, including renovating every aspect of the hotel and shutting down over 200 rooms); and

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing, removed in the first quarter of 2011 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were completed in January 2013, including the conversion of one tower of the hotel into apartments, reducing the room count, and the renovation of the remaining guest rooms, lobby, bar and meeting space).

We evaluate the operating performance of our comparable hotels based on both geographic regionmarket and property type. These divisions are generally consistent with groupings recognized in the lodging industry.

Geographic regionsOur markets consist of the following (only states in which we own hotels are listed):following:

Domestic

Pacific—California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington;

Boston –Greater Boston Metropolitan area;

New York – Greater New York Metropolitan area, including northern New Jersey;

Philadelphia – Philadelphia Metropolitan area;

Washington D.C. – Metropolitan area, including the Maryland and Virginia suburbs;

Atlanta – Atlanta Metropolitan area;

Florida – All Florida locations;

Chicago – Chicago Metropolitan area;

Denver – Denver Metropolitan area;

Houston – Houston Metropolitan area;

Phoenix – Phoenix Metropolitan area, including Scottsdale;

Seattle – Seattle Metropolitan area;

San Francisco – Greater San Francisco Metropolitan area, including San Jose;

Los Angeles – Greater Los Angeles area, including Orange County;

San Diego –San Diego Metropolitan area;

Hawaii – All Hawaii locations; and

Other – Select cities in California, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and Texas;

International

Mountain—Arizona and Colorado;

Asia-Pacific –Australia and New Zealand;

Canada – Toronto and Calgary; and

Latin America –Brazil, Chile and Mexico.

North Central—Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri and Ohio;

South Central—Louisiana, Tennessee and Texas;

New England—Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire;

Mid-Atlantic—Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York;

DC Metro—Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C.;

Atlanta—Georgia and North Carolina;

Florida—Florida; and

International—Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico and New Zealand.

PropertyOur property types consist of the following:

Urban—Hotels located in primary business districts of major cities;

Suburban—Hotels located in office parks or smaller secondary markets;

Resort/conference—Hotels located in resort/conference destinations such as Arizona, Florida, Hawaii and Southern California; and

Airport—Hotels located at or near airports.


Constant US$, Nominal US$, and Constant Euros

Operating results denominated in primary business districtsforeign currencies are translated using the prevailing exchange rates on the date of major cities;

Suburban—Hotels located in office parksthe transaction, or smaller secondary markets;

Resort/conference—Hotels located in resort/conference destinations such as Arizona, Florida, Hawaii and Southern California; and

Airport—Hotels located at or near airports.

Reporting Periods.

For Consolidated Statement of Operations. The results we report aremonthly based on the weighted average exchange rate for the period. For comparative purposes, we also present the RevPAR results for 2013 assuming the results of our hotels reported to us by our hotel managers. Our hotel managers use different reporting periods. Marriott,foreign operations were translated using the manager of a significant percentage of our properties, uses a year ending on the Friday closest to December 31 and reports twelve weeks of operationssame exchange rates that were effective for the first three quarters and sixteen or seventeen weekscomparable periods in 2014, thereby eliminating the effect of currency fluctuation for the fourth quarteryear-over-year comparisons. We believe this presentation is useful to investors as it provides clarity with respect to the growth in RevPAR in the local currency of the yearhotel consistent with the manner in which we would evaluate our domestic portfolio. However, the effect of changes in foreign currency has been reflected in the actual results of net income, EBITDA, earnings per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share. Nominal US$ results include the effect of currency fluctuations consistent with our financial statement presentation.

We also present RevPAR results for its U.S. and Canadian Marriott-managed hotels. In contrast, other managers of our hotels, such as Hyatt and Starwood, report results on a monthly basis. Host Inc., as a REIT, is required by federal income tax law to report results on a calendar year basis. As a result, we elected to adopt the reporting periods used by Marriott, modified so that our fiscal year always ends on December 31joint venture in order to comply with REIT rules. Our first three quarters of operations end onEurope in constant Euros using the same daymethodology as Marriott, but our fourth quarter ends on December 31 and our full year results, as reported in our statement of operations, always includes the same number of days as the calendar year.

Two consequences of the reporting cycle we have adopted are: (1) quarterly start dates will usually differ between years, exceptused for the first quarter which always commences on January 1, and (2) our first and fourth quarters of operations and year-to-date operations may not include the same number of days as reflected in prior years. For example, set forth below are the quarterly start and end dates for 2012, 2011 and 2010. Note that the second and third quarters of each year both reflect twelve weeks of operations. In contrast, the first and fourth quarters reflect differing days of operations.constant US$ presentation.    

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
 

First Quarter

 January 1—March 23  83   January 1—March 25  84   January 1—March 26  85  

Second Quarter

 March 24—June 15  84   March 26—June 17  84   March 27—June 18  84  

Third Quarter

 June 16—September 7  84   June 18—September 9  84   June 19—September 10  84  

Fourth Quarter

 September 8—December 31  115   September 10—December 31  113   September 11—December 31  112  

While the reporting calendar we adopted is more closely aligned with the reporting calendar used by Marriott, another consequence of our calendar is that we are unable to report the month of operations that ends after our fiscal quarter-end until the following quarter because our hotel managers that use a monthly reporting period do not make mid-month results available to us. Hence, the month of operation that ends after our fiscal quarter-end is included in our quarterly results of operations in the following quarter for those hotel managers (covering approximately 43% of total revenues of our hotels). As a result, our quarterly results of operations include results from hotel managers reporting results on a monthly basis as follows: first quarter (January, February), second quarter (March to May), third quarter (June to August) and fourth quarter (September to December). While this does not affect full year results, it does affect the reporting of quarterly results.

For Hotel Operating Statistics and Comparable Hotel Results. In contrast to the reporting periods for our consolidated statement of operations, our hotel operating statistics (i.e., RevPAR, average daily rate and average occupancy) and our comparable hotel results are reported based on the reporting cycle used by Marriott for our Marriott-managed hotels. This facilitates year-to-year comparisons, as each reporting period will be comprised of the same number of days of operations as in the prior year. This means, however, that the reporting periods we use for hotel operating statistics and our comparable hotel results typically will differ slightly from the reporting periods used for our statements of operations for the first and fourth quarters and the full year. Set forth below are the quarterly start and end dates that are used for our hotel operating statistics and comparable hotel results reported herein. Results from hotel managers reporting on a monthly basis are included in our operating statistics and comparable hotel results consistent with their reporting in our consolidated statement of operations.

Hotel Result Reporting Periods for Operating Statistics

and Comparable Hotel Results—for Marriott Managed Properties

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
  

Start-End Dates

 No. of
Days
 

First Quarter

 December 31—March 23  84   January 1—March 25  84   January 2—March 26  84  

Second Quarter

 March 24—June 15  84   March 26—June 17  84   March 27—June 18  84  

Third Quarter

 June 16—September 7  84   June 18—September 9  84   June 19—September 10  84  

Fourth Quarter

 September 8—December 28  112   September 10—December 30  112   September 11—December 31  112  

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use certain “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are measures of our historical financial performance that are not calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. These measures are as follows: (i) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as a measure of performance for Host Inc. and Host L.P., (ii) Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and FFO per diluted share (both NAREIT and Adjusted), as a measure of performance for Host Inc., and (iii) comparable hotel property level operating results, as a measure of performance for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies that do not use the NAREIT definition of FFO or do not calculate FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. In addition, although FFO per diluted share is a useful measure when comparing our results to other REITs, it may not be helpful to investors when comparing us to non-REITs. We also calculate Adjusted FFO per diluted share, which measure is not in accordance with NAREIT guidance and may not be comparable to measures calculated by other REITs. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, also may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies. This information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit, cash from operations or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Cash expenditures for various long-term assets (such as renewal and replacement capital expenditures), interest expense (for EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA purposes only) and other items have been and will be made and are not reflected in the EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share presentations. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, NAREIT FFO per diluted share, Adjusted FFO per diluted share, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share do not measure, and should not be used as a measure of, amounts that accrue directly to stockholders’ benefit. The following discussion defines these terms and presents why we believe they are useful measures of our performance.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA

Earnings before Interest Expense, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries. Management believes EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it helps us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating performance of our properties after removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization). Management also believes the use of EBITDA facilitates comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners whothat are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. Management uses EBITDA to evaluate property-level results and as one measure in determining the value of acquisitions and dispositions and, like FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share, it is widely used by management in the annual budget process and for compensation programs.


Adjusted EBITDA

Historically, management has adjusted EBITDA when evaluating Host Inc. and Host L.P.our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of net income, is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA also is also a relevant measure in calculating certain credit ratios. We adjust EBITDA for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA:

Real Estate Transactions – We exclude the effect of gains and losses, including the amortization of deferred gains, recorded on the disposition or acquisition of depreciable assets and property insurance gains in our consolidated statement of operations because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated book value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset book value often does not reflect its market value (as noted below for FFO).

Equity Investment Adjustments – We exclude the equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated investments in partnerships and joint ventures as presented in our consolidated statement of operations because it includes our pro rata portion of depreciation, amortization and interest expense, which are excluded from EBITDA. We include our pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our equity investments as we believe this more accurately reflects the performance of our investment.investments. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments is defined as the EBITDA of our equity investments adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by our percentage ownership in the partnership or joint venture.

Consolidated Partnership Adjustments – We deduct the non-controlling partners’ pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships as this reflects the non-controlling owners’ interest in the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of non-controlling partners is defined as the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by the non-controlling partners’ positions in the partnership or joint venture.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle – Infrequently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

Impairment Losses – We exclude the effect of impairment lossesexpense recorded because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment charges areexpense, which is based on historical cost book values, is similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which also are also excluded from EBITDA.

Acquisition Costs – Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Litigation Gains and LossesEffective April 1, 2013, we have excluded the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business, which is consistent with the definition of Adjusted FFO that we adopted effective January 1, 2011. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

In unusual circumstances, we also may adjust EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies. This information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit, cash from operationsfor gains or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Cash expenditures for various long-term assets (such as renewal and replacement capital expenditures), interest expense and other items have been and will be incurred andlosses that management believes are not reflectedrepresentative of our current operating performance. For example, in the EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA presentations. Management compensatesfirst quarter of 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded itemsland adjacent to the extent theyAtlanta Marriott Perimeter Center for which we received the cash proceeds in 2007, but, pending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are material to operating decisions or assessmentsincluded in the determination of our operating performance. Our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions.EBITDA.


The following table provides a reconciliation of net lossincome to Adjusted EBITDA (in millions):

Reconciliation of Net LossIncome to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

  Year ended December 31, 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

  2011 2010 

Net loss

  $(16 $(132

Net income (2)

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

Interest expense

   371    384  

 

 

214

 

 

 

304

 

Depreciation and amortization

   647    591  

 

 

695

 

 

 

696

 

Income taxes

   (1  (31

 

 

14

 

 

 

21

 

  

 

  

 

 

EBITDA

   1,001    812  

Losses on dispositions

   —      2  

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

EBITDA (2)

 

 

1,670

 

 

 

1,361

 

Gain on dispositions (3)

 

 

(233

)

 

 

(98

)

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

Acquisition costs

   5    10  

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Non-cash impairment charges

   8    —    

Amortization of deferred gains

   (7  —    

Recognition of deferred gain on land condemnation (4)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Litigation (gain) loss (5)

 

 

(61

)

 

 

8

 

Non-cash impairment loss

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

Equity investment adjustments:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

   (4  1  

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates (6)

 

 

(26

)

 

 

17

 

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments

   29    23  

 

 

68

 

 

 

48

 

Consolidated partnership adjustments:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling partners in other consolidated partnerships

   (14  (14

 

 

(23

)

 

 

(21

)

  

 

  

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

  $1,018   $834  

 

$

1,402

 

 

$

1,306

 

  

 

  

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Reflects the interest expense, depreciation and amortization and income taxes included in discontinued operations.

(2)

Net Income, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO include a gain of $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 for the sale of the portion of land attributable to individual units sold by the Maui timeshare joint venture. These metrics also include a gain of $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the sale of excess land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa.

(3)

Reflects the sale of an 89% controlling interest in one hotel in 2014, the sale of four hotels in 2014 and the sale of five hotels in 2013.  

(4)

During the first quarter of 2013, we recognized a previously deferred gain of approximately $11 million related to the eminent domain claim by the State of Georgia for 2.9 acres of land at the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center for highway expansion for which we received cash proceeds in 2007. We have included the gain in NAREIT FFO per diluted share, which is consistent with the treatment of gains recognized on the disposition of non-depreciated assets. However, due to the significant passage of time since we received the proceeds, we have excluded the gain from Adjusted FFO per diluted share and Adjusted EBITDA for 2013.

(5)

We exclude the net effect of litigation recoveries/gains or losses that we consider outside of the ordinary course of business from our determination of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO. For 2014 and 2013, the amounts primarily reflect activity for the litigation concerning the ground lease for the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter started in 2005. Over time, we had accrued litigation losses totaling $69 million (including $8 million accrued in 2013) for this litigation. On October 3, 2014, the final motion for rehearing by Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation to the Texas Supreme Court was denied. As a result, in the third quarter of 2014, we reversed the $69 million loss contingency, which is included as a reduction to corporate expense in net income. Consistent with our definition of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO, we have excluded $59 million of the gain, as the related accrual for this amount was similarly excluded in prior years. We are including $10 million of the gain in Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO, which represents periodic interest accrued on the judgments since 2010, as this amount was included as a reduction in Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO in prior years. See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information on the resolution of this case.

(6)

An adjustment of $15 million is included for the year ended December 31, 2013 for our portion of the non-cash impairment charges related to one of the hotels in our joint venture in Europe. The impairment charge has no effect on Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO or Adjusted FFO.

NAREIT FFO, NAREIT FFO per Diluted Share and Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share.We present NAREIT FFO and NAREIT FFO per diluted share as non-GAAP measures of our performance in addition to our earnings per share (calculated in accordance with GAAP). We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share as our NAREIT FFO (defined as set forth below) for a given operating period, as adjusted for the effect of dilutive securities, divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding during such period in accordance with NAREIT guidelines. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, real estate-related depreciation, amortization and impairments and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect our pro rata share of the FFO of those entities on the same basis.

We believe that NAREIT FFO per diluted share is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance and that the presentation of NAREIT FFO per diluted share, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share, provides beneficial information to investors. By excluding the effect of real estate depreciation, amortization, impairments and gains and losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance, we believe such measures can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other


REITs, even though NAREIT FFO per diluted share does not represent an amount that accrues directly to holders of our common stock. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted by NAREIT in its April 2002 “White Paper on Funds From Operations,” since real estate values historically have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For these reasons, NAREIT adopted the FFO metric in order to promote an industry-wide measure of REIT operating performance.

Effective with this Form 10-K, weWe also present Adjusted FFO per diluted share when evaluating our performance because management believes that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance. While we are presenting Adjusted FFO per diluted share as part of this Form 10-K for the first time, managementManagement historically has made the adjustments detailed below in evaluating our performance, in our annual budget process and for our compensation programs. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted FFO per diluted share, when combined with both the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share and FFO per diluted share as defined by NAREIT,

provides useful supplemental information that is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust NAREIT FFO per diluted share for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO per diluted share:

Gains and Losses on the Extinguishment of Debt – We exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of the write off of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired.retired and incremental interest expense incurred during the refinancing period. We also exclude the gains on debt repurchases and the original issuance costs associated with the retirement of preferred stock. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.

Acquisition Costs –Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Litigation Gains and Losses – We exclude the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

We calculateIn unusual circumstances, we also may adjust NAREIT FFO per diluted share in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies who do not use the NAREIT definition of FFOfor gains or do not calculate FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. In addition, although FFO per diluted share is a useful measure when comparing our results to other REITs, it may not be helpful to investors when comparing us to non-REITs. This information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit, cash from operations or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Cash expenditures for various long-term assets (such as renewal and replacement capital expenditures) and other items have been and will be incurred andlosses that management believes are not reflectedrepresentative of our current operating performance. For example, in the first quarter of 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for land adjacent to the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center for which we received the cash proceeds in 2007, but, pending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are included in the determination of NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share presentations. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows include capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share do not measure, and should not be used as a measure of, amounts that accrue directly to the benefit of Host Inc. stockholders.FFO.


The following tables providetable provides a reconciliation of net loss availableincome to common stockholders per share toNAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO (separately and on a per diluted share basis) for Host Inc. (in millions, except per share amounts):

Host Inc. Reconciliation of Net Loss Available toIncome

Common Stockholders to NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per Diluted Share

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Net loss

  $(16 $(132

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   1    2  

Dividends on preferred stock

   —      (4

Issuance costs of redeemed preferred stock

   —      (4
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss available to common stockholders

   (15  (138

Adjustments:

   

Losses on dispositions, net of taxes

   —      2  

Amortization of deferred gains and other property transactions, net of taxes

   (7  —    

Depreciation and amortization

   645    591  

Non-cash impairment charges

   8    —    

Partnership adjustments

   4    4  

FFO of non-controlling interests of Host LP

   (9  (7
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NAREIT Funds From Operations

   626    452  

Adjustments to NAREIT FFO:

   

Losses on the extinguishment of debt (a)

   10    26  

Acquisition costs (b)

   8    10  

Litigation losses

   5    4  

Loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   —      (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted FFO

  $649   $491  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjustments for dilutive securities (c):

   

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

  $30   $13  

Assuming deduction of interest – redeemed/exchanged 2004 Debentures

   2    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted NAREIT FFO

  $658   $465  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted Adjusted FFO

  $681   $504  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding-EPS

   693.0    656.1  

Assuming issuance of common shares granted under the Comprehensive Stock Plan

   2.0    2.9  

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

   39.8    21.2  

Weighted average outstanding shares – redeemed/exchanged 2004 Debentures

   4.7    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding – NAREIT FFO andAdjusted FFO

   739.5    680.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

  $.89   $.68  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share (d)

  $.92   $.74  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Net income (2)

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on dispositions, net of taxes (3)

 

 

(232

)

 

 

(97

)

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

692

 

 

 

703

 

Non-cash impairment loss

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

Equity investment adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates (6)

 

 

(26

)

 

 

17

 

Pro rata FFO of equity investments

 

 

51

 

 

 

26

 

Consolidated partnership adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO adjustment for non-controlling partnerships

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(8

)

FFO adjustments for non-controlling interests of Host L.P.

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(8

)

NAREIT FFO (2)

 

 

1,207

 

 

 

951

 

Adjustments to NAREIT FFO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

4

 

 

 

40

 

Acquisition costs

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

Recognition of deferred gain on land condemnation (4)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Litigation (gain) loss (5)

 

 

(61

)

 

 

8

 

Adjusted FFO (2)

 

$

1,153

 

 

$

989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For calculation on a per share basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for dilutive securities (1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

27

 

 

$

26

 

Diluted NAREIT FFO

 

$

1,234

 

 

$

977

 

Diluted Adjusted FFO

 

$

1,180

 

 

$

1,015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding-EPS

 

 

786.8

 

 

 

747.9

 

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

 

 

 

 

29.5

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO

 

 

786.8

 

 

 

777.4

 

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

1.26

 

Adjusted FFO per diluted share

 

$

1.50

 

 

$

1.31

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(1)

Represents costs associated with the redemption of the Series K senior notes and 2007 Debentures in 2011 and the Series M senior notes in 2010 and the original issuance costs of Class E preferred stock, which stock was redeemed on June 18, 2010.
(b)Includes approximately $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to our share of acquisition costs incurred by unconsolidated joint ventures.
(c)Earnings/loss

Earnings per diluted share and NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT are adjusted for the effects of dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include Host Inc. shares granted under Host Inc.’s comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by non-controlling partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units. No effect is shown for securities if they are anti-dilutive.

(d)

(2-6)

Adjusted FFO per diluted share for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2011 was reduced by $.02 per diluted share due

Refer to the $15 million deposit forfeited as a resultcorresponding footnote on the Reconciliation of the terminated Grand Hyatt Washington, D.C. acquisition.Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for Host Inc. and Host L.P.


Comparable Hotel Property Level Operating Results.We present certain operating results for our hotels, such as hotel revenues, expenses, EBITDA and adjusted operating profit,EBITDA margin, on a comparable hotel, or “same store,” basis as supplemental information for investorsinvestors. Our comparable hotel results present operating results for hotels owned during the entirety of both Host Inc. and Host L.P.the periods being compared without giving effect to any acquisitions or dispositions, significant property damage or large scale capital improvements during these periods. We present these comparable hotel EBITDA to help us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating results by eliminating corporate-level costs, including expenses related toperformance of our comparable properties after removing the impact of our capital structure as well as(primarily interest expense), and its asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization. We eliminateamortization).  Other corporate-level costs and expenses because weare also removed to arrive at property-level results.  We believe these property-level results provide investors with more specific insightsupplemental information into the ongoing operating performance of our comparable hotels. We eliminate depreciation and amortization because, even though depreciation and amortization are property-level expenses, these non-cash expenses, which are based on historical cost accounting for real estate assets, implicitly assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted earlier, because real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.

As a result of the elimination of corporate-level costs and expenses and depreciation and amortization, the comparable hotel operating results we present do not represent our total revenues, expenses or operating profit and these comparable hotel operating results should not be used to evaluate our performance as a whole. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statements of operations include such amounts, all of which should be considered by investors when evaluating our performance.

We present these hotel operating results on a comparable hotel basis because we believe that doing so provides investors and management with useful information for evaluating the period-to-period performance of our hotels and facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. In particular, these measures assist management and investors in distinguishing whether increases or decreases in revenues and/or expenses are due to growth or decline of operations at comparable hotels (which represent the vast majority of our portfolio) or from other factors, such as the effect of acquisitions or dispositions. While management believes that presentation of comparable hotel results is a “same store” supplemental measure that provides useful information in evaluating our ongoing performance, this measure is not used to allocate resources or to assess the operating performance of these hotels, as these decisions are based on data for individual hotels and are not based on comparable portfolio hotel results. For these reasons, we believe that comparable hotel operating results, when combined with the presentation of GAAP operating profit, revenues and expenses, provide useful information to investors and management.


The following table presents certain operating results and statistics for our comparable hotels for the periods presented herein:

Comparable Hotel Results for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

(in millions, except hotel statistics) (a)

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Number of hotels

   104    104  

Number of rooms

   57,203    57,203  

Percent change in Comparable Hotel RevPAR

   6.1  —    

Operating profit margin under GAAP (b)

   6.5  5.0

Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit margin (b)

   22.3  21.4

Comparable hotel revenues

   

Room

  $2,709   $2,552  

Food and beverage

   1,334    1,265  

Other

   272    270  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel revenues (c)

   4,315    4,087  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel expenses

   

Room

   745    705  

Food and beverage

   988    943  

Other

   157    154  

Management fees, ground rent and other costs

   1,464    1,410  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel expenses (d)

   3,354    3,212  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit

   961    875  

Non-comparable hotel results, net (e)

   132    60  

Loss from hotels leased from HPT (f)

   (6  (13

Depreciation and amortization

   (652  (591

Corporate and other expenses

   (111  (108
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit

  $324   $223  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Number of hotels

 

 

106

 

 

 

106

 

Number of rooms

 

 

55,252

 

 

 

55,252

 

Percent change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Constant US$

 

 

5.7

%

 

 

Percent change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Nominal US$

 

 

5.3

%

 

 

 

Operating profit margin (1)

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

9.9

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA margin (1)

 

 

26.5

%

 

 

25.3

%

Comparable hotel revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

$

3,270

 

 

$

3,104

 

Food and beverage (2)

 

 

1,418

 

 

 

1,367

 

Other

 

 

285

 

 

 

269

 

Comparable hotel revenues (3)

 

 

4,973

 

 

 

4,740

 

Comparable hotel expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

$

874

 

 

$

834

 

Food and beverage (4)

 

 

1,025

 

 

 

999

 

Other

 

 

139

 

 

 

138

 

Management fees, ground rent and other costs

 

 

1,617

 

 

 

1,569

 

Comparable hotel expenses (5)

 

 

3,655

 

 

 

3,540

 

Comparable hotel EBITDA

 

 

1,318

 

 

 

1,200

 

Non-comparable hotel results, net (6)

 

 

136

 

 

 

130

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(701

)

 

 

(697

)

Interest expense

 

 

(214

)

 

 

(304

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(21

)

Gain on sale of property and corporate level income/expense

 

 

222

 

 

 

17

 

Net income

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(1)

The reporting period for our comparable operating statistics for 2011 is from January 1, 2011 to December 30, 2011 and for 2010 is January 2, 2010 to December 31, 2010. See “—Reporting Periods” for more information on our fiscal calendar.
(b)

Operating profit margins are calculated by dividing the applicable operating profit by the related revenue amount. GAAP operating profit margins are calculated using amounts presented in the consolidated statementstatements of operations. Comparable hotel EBITDA margins are calculated using amounts presented in the above table.

(c)

(2)

The reconciliation of total food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage sales is as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

1,546

 

 

$

1,503

 

Non-comparable hotel food and beverage sales

 

 

(164

)

 

 

(169

)

Food and beverage sales for the property for which we record rental income

 

 

36

 

 

 

33

 

Comparable food and beverage sales

 

$

1,418

 

 

$

1,367

 

(3)

The reconciliation of total revenues per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel revenues is as follows:

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Revenues per the consolidated statements of operations

  $4,998   $4,428  

Non-comparable hotel revenues

   (513  (222

Hotel revenues for the property for which we record rental income, net

   51    48  

Revenues for hotels leased from HPT

   (221  (167
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel revenues

  $4,315   $4,087  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Revenues per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

5,354

 

 

$

5,166

 

Non-comparable hotel revenues

 

 

(437

)

 

 

(478

)

Hotel revenues for the property for which we record rental income, net

 

 

56

 

 

 

52

 

Comparable hotel revenues

 

$

4,973

 

 

$

4,740

 


(d)

(4)

The reconciliation of total food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage expenses is as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

1,109

 

 

$

1,095

 

Non-comparable hotel food and beverage expenses

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(117

)

Food and beverage expenses for the property for which we record rental income

 

 

22

 

 

 

21

 

Comparable food and beverage expenses

 

$

1,025

 

 

$

999

 

(5)

The reconciliation of operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel expenses is as follows:

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations

  $4,674   $4,205  

Non-comparable hotel expenses

   (381  (162

Hotel expenses for the property for which we record rental income

   51    48  

Expense for hotels leased from HPT

   (227  (180

Depreciation and amortization

   (652  (591

Corporate and other expenses

   (111  (108
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comparable hotel expenses

  $3,354   $3,212  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

4,644

 

 

$

4,654

 

Non-comparable hotel expenses

 

 

(301

)

 

 

(348

)

Hotel expenses for the property for which we record rental income

 

 

56

 

 

 

52

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(701

)

 

 

(697

)

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(121

)

Comparable hotel expenses

 

$

3,655

 

 

$

3,540

 

(e)

(6)

Non-comparable hotel results, net, includes the following items: (i) the results of operations of our non-comparable hotels whoseand sold hotels, which operations are included in our consolidated statements of operations as continuing operations, (ii) gains on property insurance settlements, and (iii) the results of our office buildings, and (iv) the difference between the number of days of operations reflected in the comparable hotel results and the number of days of operations reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.buildings.  

(f)Represents income less expense for hotels leased from HPT.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

All information in this section applies to Host Inc. and Host L.P.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We have no derivative financial instruments that are held for trading purposes. We use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks.

The interest payments on 90%79% of our debt are fixed in nature, (this percentage does not include $300 million of mortgage debt for which we have swapped fixed interest payments for floating interest payments), which largely mitigates the effect of changes in interest rates on our cash interest payments. Valuations for mortgage debt and the credit facility are determined based on expected future payments, discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The senior notes and the Debentures are valued based on quoted market prices. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase or decrease by 100 basis points, interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $7$10 million in 2012.

2015. The table below presents scheduled maturities and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates (in millions, except percentages):

 

   Expected Maturity Date        
   2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  Thereafter  Total   Fair
Value
 

Liabilities

          

Debt:

          

Fixed rate (1)

  $378   $231   $1,135   $1,046   $797   $1,770   $5,357    $5,679  

Average interest rate

   6.42  6.49  6.72  6.83  6.87  6.44   

Variable rate (1)

  $3   $111   $—     $117   $165   $—     $396    $401  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average interest rate (2)

   5.70  5.22  5.00  5.07  6.76  —     

Total debt

        $5,753    $6,080  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest rate derivative

          

Fixed to variable-notional

  $—     $—     $300   $—     $—     $—       

Fair value (asset)/liability

          $(11

Average pay rate (2)

   3.37  3.37  3.37  —    —    —     

Average receive rate

   5.531  5.531  5.531  —    —    —     

Variable to fixed-notional

  $—     $—     $—     $—     $124   $—       

Fair value (asset)/liability

          $4  

Average pay rate

   6.92  6.92  6.92  6.92  6.76  —     

Average receive rate (2)

   6.15  6.15  6.15  6.15  6.76  —     

 

Expected Maturity Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

Value

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate (1)

$

386

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

2,149

 

 

$

3,035

 

 

$

3,567

 

Average interest rate

 

5.45

%

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

5.19

%

 

 

5.07

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate (1)

$

 

 

$

253

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

204

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

957

 

 

$

957

 

Average interest rate (2)

 

2.24

%

 

 

1.84

%

 

 

1.45

%

 

 

1.63

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,992

 

 

$

4,524

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate derivative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable to fixed-notional

$

 

 

$

112

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value (asset)/liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2

 

Average pay rate

 

6.78

%

 

 

6.72

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average receive rate (2)

 

5.50

%

 

 

5.19

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts are net of unamortized discounts and premiums.

(2)

The interest rate for our floating rate payments is based on the rate in effect as of December 31, 2011.2014. No adjustments are made for forecast changes in the rate.

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.We have designated our floating-to-fixed interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. The purpose of the interest rate swaps is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in benchmark interest rates associated with variable rate debt. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the swaps. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying balance sheets. The hedges were fully effective as of December 31, 2011.

In connection with the acquisition of the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf on April 29, 2011, we assumed an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of A$80 million ($86 million) related to its mortgage debt. In November 2011, as part of the refinancing of this loan, we paid approximately $1 million to settle the original swap and entered into a new interest rate swap with a notional amount of A$61.5 million ($60 million) and a maturity date of November 23, 2016.2014. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in the Reuters BBSY. As a result, we will pay an all-in rate of 6.7% on the notional amount of the swap. We designated the derivative as a cash flow hedge. As a result of the change in fair value of this swap, a $0.3 million loss was recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. As of December 31, 2011, we recorded a liability of $0.4 million related to the fair value of this swap.

On February 18, 2011, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of NZ$79 million ($60 million) related to the mortgage debt on the seven properties acquired in New Zealand on February 18, 2011. We entered into the swap in order to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in the 3-month NZ$ Bank Bill rate. As a result, we will pay an all-in rate of 7.15% on the notional amount of the swap, which includes the 120 basis point spread over the NZ$ Bank Bill rate plus an additional 120 basis point commitment fee. We have designated the derivative as a cash flow hedge. As a result of the change in fair value of this derivative, a $2.7 million loss was recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. As of December 31, 2011, we recorded a liability of $3.8 million related to the fair value of this swap.

Interest Rate Swap Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges.We have designatedfollowing table summarizes our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap derivatives designated as fair value hedges. We enter into these derivative instruments to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that occur as a result of changes in market interest rates. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation of the fair value of the swaps. The change in the fair value of the derivative is offset largely by the corresponding change in the fair value of the underlying debt due to change in the 3-month LIBOR rate, which is recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the debt. Any difference between the change in the fair value of the swap and the change in the fair value in the underlying debt, which was not significant for the periods presented, is considered the ineffective portion of the hedging relationship and is recorded in net income (loss).cash flow hedges (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

 

Total Notional

 

 

Maturity

 

Swapped

 

All-in-

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Transaction Date

 

Amount

 

 

Date

 

Index

 

Rate

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

November 2011 (1)

 

A$

 

62

 

 

November 2016

 

Reuters BBSY

 

 

6.7

%

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

1

 

February 2011 (2)

 

NZ$

 

79

 

 

February 2016

 

NZ$ Bank Bill

 

 

7.15

%

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

2

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We have three interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $300 million related to The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa mortgage loan in the amount of $300 million. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we recorded assets of $10.9 million and $10.6 million, respectively, related to the fair value of the swaps. During 2011 and 2010, the fair value of the swaps increased $0.3 million and $11.6 million, respectively. As a result, we will pay a floating interest rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR, plus a spread which ranges from 2.7% to 3.2%, as opposed to the fixed rate of 5.531%, on the notional amount of $300 million through March 1, 2014. During each of 2011 and 2010, the cash settlement received under the swap agreement decreased interest expense by $6 million. If we were to increase the interest rates from the prevailing market yield curve, which for our reverse swaps is 3-month LIBOR, by 25% at December 31, 2011, then the fair value of the swap would decrease $1 million. Similarly, if we were to decrease the interest rates from the prevailing market yield curve by 25% at December 31, 2011, then the fair value of the swap would increase by $1 million.

(1)

The swap was entered into in connection with the A$86 million ($71 million) mortgage loan on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf.

(2)

The swap was entered into in connection with the NZ$105 million ($82 million) mortgage loan on seven properties in New Zealand.


Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We have currency exchange risk as a result of our hotel ownership in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico Brazil, and New Zealand and our investment in the European and AsianAsia/Pacific joint ventures. ToWe utilize several strategies to mitigate the exposure of exchange risk for our portfolio, including (i) utilizing local currency denominated debt (including foreign currency draws on our credit facility), (ii) entering into forward or option foreign currency purchase contracts, and (iii) investing through partnership and joint venture structures. For 2014 and 2013, revenues from our consolidated foreign operations were $277 million and $271 million, respectively, or 5% of our total revenues. As of December 31, 2014, our international investments consisted of the following (in millions):    

Consolidated

Country

 

Consolidated Assets (Book Value)

 

 

Mortgage Debt

 

 

Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

Net Assets

 

 

Credit Facility Draw(1)

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Purchase Contracts (notional)

 

 

Net Asset Exposure

 

 

2014  Net Gain/(Loss) on Foreign Currency Exposure (2)

 

Australia

 

$

121

 

 

$

(71

)

 

$

(11

)

 

$

39

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

(3

)

Brazil

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

(9

)

Canada

 

 

96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

(92

)

 

 

(22

)

 

 

(18

)

 

 

(1

)

Chile

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

(10

)

Mexico

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

(3

)

New Zealand

 

 

162

 

 

 

(82

)

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

(4

)

United Kingdom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

$

568

 

 

$

(153

)

 

$

(25

)

 

$

390

 

 

$

(110

)

 

$

(22

)

 

$

258

 

 

$

(29

)

Unconsolidated

 

 

Investment Balance

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Purchase Contracts (notional)

 

 

Credit Facility Draw

 

 

Net Asset Exposure

 

 

2014  Net Gain/(Loss) on Foreign Currency Exposure (2)

 

European Joint Venture

 

$

348

 

 

$

(135

)

 

$

(93

)

 

$

120

 

 

$

(14

)

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

370

 

 

$

(135

)

 

$

(93

)

 

$

142

 

 

$

(14

)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Approximately $27 million of the $92 million CAD credit facility draw has been designated as a hedge of our net investment in Canadian entities.

(2)

Includes a net loss of $42 million that is included in accumulated other comprehensive income and $1 million recognized during 2014 in our Statement of Operations.

Hedging Instruments. As described above, to manage the currency exchange risk applicable to ownership in non-U.S. hotels, where possible, we may enter into forward or option contracts.foreign currency purchase contracts or designate a portion of the foreign currency draws on our credit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The foreign currency exchange agreements thatinto which we have entered into were strictly are to hedge foreign currency risk and are not for trading purposes.


During 2011, 2010 and 2008,As of December 31, 2014, we entered intohave five foreign currency forward sale contracts totaling €100 million (approximately $140 million) in order tothat hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the European joint venture. Pursuant to these transactions, we will sell the Euro amount and receive the U.S. dollar amount on the forward sale date. On July 29, 2011, we also entered into an NZ$30 million ($25 million) forward purchase contract in order to hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in HHR New Zealand Holdings Limited. We will sell the NZ dollar amount and receive the U.S. dollar amount on August 2, 2013.operations. These derivatives are considered a hedgehedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation and are marked-

to-marketmarked-to-market with changes in fair value and recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Host Inc.’sthe equity portion and Host L.P.’s capital portion of theirour balance sheets. The foreign currency forward sale contracts are valued based on the forward yield curve of the foreign currency to U.S. dollar forward exchange rate on the date of measurement. Pursuant to these contracts, we will sell the foreign currency amount, as applicable, and receive the U.S. dollar amount on the forward sale date. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation ofwhen we calculate the fair value of the swaps.derivatives. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of our foreign currency forward sale contracts is $13 million. The following table summarizes our four foreign currency forward sale contracts (in millions):

 

    Total
Transaction
Amount

in Foreign
Currency
   Total
Transaction

Amount
in Dollars
   Forward
Sale
Date Range
   Fair Value at   Change in Fair Value
for the period ended
 

Transaction

Date Range

        December 31,
2011
   December 31,
2010
   December 31,
2011
   December 31,
2010
 

February 2008-July 2011

  100    $140     
 
October 2012-
August 2015
  
  
  $8.8    $6.9    $1.9    $5.2  

July 2011

  NZ$30    $25     August 2013    $1.9    $—      $1.9    $—    

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value - All Contracts

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

Amount in

 

 

Total

Transaction

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction Date

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Forward Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

July 2011-May 2014

 

 

100

 

 

$

135

 

 

August 2015-May 2017

 

$

18

 

 

$

(5

)

November 2014

 

C$

 

25

 

 

$

22

 

 

November 2016

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

In addition to the foreign currency forward sale contracts, we have designated a portion of the foreign currency draws on our credit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. As a result, currency translation adjustments in the designated credit facility draws are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheet, which adjustments offset a portion of the translation adjustment related to our international investments. The following table summarizes the draws on our credit facility that are designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations (in millions):

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding in

 

Year ended December 31,

Currency

 

US$

 

Foreign Currency

 

2014

 

2013

Canadian dollars (1)

 

$

27

 

C$

31

 

$

2

 

$

2

Euros

 

$

93

 

77

 

$

13

 

$

(5)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 8.

(1)

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

We have drawn an additional $65 million on the credit facility in Canadian dollars that has not been designated as a hedging instrument.


Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following financial information is included on the pages indicated:

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. & Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

94

84

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

96

86

Financial Statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013

97

87

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

98

88

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

99

89

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

100

90

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

102

91

Financial Statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013

104

93

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

105

94

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

106

95

Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

107

96

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

109

97

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

111

99


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011.2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule III as listed in the index as item 15(a)(ii).III. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method for reporting discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 22, 201224, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 24, 2015

 /s/ KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia

February 22, 2012

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

We have audited Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Item 9aControls and Procedures—Internal Control over Financial Reporting of Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accountingaccounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2014, and our report dated February 22, 201224, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 24, 2015

 /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia


February 22, 2012

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011.2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule III as listed in the index as item 15(a)(ii).III. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Host Hotels & Resorts, L. P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

                     /s/As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method for reporting discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 24, 2015

McLean, Virginia

February 22, 2012

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 20112014 and 20102013

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

  2011 2010 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

ASSETS   

ASSETS

 

Property and equipment, net

  $11,383   $10,514  

 

$

10,575

 

 

$

10,995

 

Due from managers

   37    45  

 

 

70

 

 

 

52

 

Investments in affiliates

   197    148  

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

433

 

 

 

415

 

Deferred financing costs, net

   55    44  

 

 

35

 

 

 

42

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund

   166    152  

 

 

129

 

 

 

173

 

Other

   368    354  

 

 

281

 

 

 

244

 

Restricted cash

   36    41  

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   826    1,113  

 

 

684

 

 

 

861

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $13,068   $12,411  

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY   

LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY

 

Debt

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes, including $902 million and $1,156 million, respectively, net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

  $4,543   $4,249  

Credit facility

   117    58  

Senior notes, including $386 million and $371 million, respectively, net

of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

2,884

 

 

$

3,018

 

Credit facility, including the $500 million term loan

 

 

704

 

 

 

946

 

Mortgage debt

   1,006    1,025  

 

 

404

 

 

 

709

 

Other

   87    145  

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total debt

   5,753    5,477  

 

 

3,992

 

 

 

4,759

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   175    161  

 

 

298

 

 

 

214

 

Other

   269    250  

 

 

324

 

 

 

389

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   6,197    5,888  

 

 

4,614

 

 

 

5,362

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interests—Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

   158    191  

Non-controlling interests - Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

225

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders’ equity:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $.01, 1,050 million shares authorized; 705.1 million and 675.6 million shares issued and outstanding, respectively

   7    7  

Common stock, par value $.01, 1,050 million shares authorized,

755.8 million shares and 754.8 million shares issued and outstanding,

respectively

 

 

8

 

 

 

8

 

Additional paid-in capital

   7,750    7,236  

 

 

8,476

 

 

 

8,492

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   (1  25  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(9

)

Deficit

   (1,079  (965

 

 

(1,098

)

 

 

(1,263

)

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders

   6,677    6,303  

 

 

7,336

 

 

 

7,228

 

Non-controlling interests—other consolidated partnerships

   36    29  

 

 

32

 

 

 

34

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

   6,713    6,332  

 

 

7,368

 

 

 

7,262

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities, non-controlling interests and equity

  $13,068   $12,411  

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(in millions, except per common share amounts)

 

   2011  2010  2009 

REVENUES

    

Rooms

  $3,022   $2,661   $2,484  

Food and beverage

   1,427    1,291    1,234  

Other

   296    277    310  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Owned hotel revenues

   4,745    4,229    4,028  

Other revenues

   253    199    107  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   4,998    4,428    4,135  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EXPENSES

    

Rooms

   832    734    681  

Food and beverage

   1,062    965    933  

Other departmental and support expenses

   1,261    1,151    1,099  

Management fees

   189    171    158  

Other property-level expenses

   569    488    386  

Depreciation and amortization

   652    591    613  

Corporate and other expenses

   111    108    116  

Gain on insurance settlement

   (2  (3  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

   4,674    4,205    3,986  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING PROFIT

   324    223    149  

Interest income

   20    8    7  

Interest expense

   (371  (384  (379

Net gains on property transactions and other

   7    1    14  

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

   3    (6  5  

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

   4    (1  (32
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   (13  (159  (236

Benefit for income taxes

   1    31    39  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   (12  (128  (197

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (4  (4  (61
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET LOSS

   (16  (132  (258

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   1    2    6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

   (15  (130  (252

Less: Dividends on preferred stock

   —      (4  (9

Issuance costs of redeemed preferred stock

   —      (4  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

  $(15 $(138 $(261
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic loss per common share:

    

Continuing operations

  $(.01 $(.20 $(.34

Discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01  (.11
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic loss per common share

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share:

    

Continuing operations

  $(.01 $(.20 $(.34

Discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01  (.11
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted loss per common share

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(in millions)

 

   2011  2010  2009 

NET LOSS

  $(16 $(132 $(258

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

    

Unrealized loss on common stock

   —      —      (4

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

   (27  8    15  

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

   1    5    (4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

   (26  13    7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

   (42  (119  (251
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non- controlling interests

   1    2    6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC

  $(41 $(117 $(245
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(in millions)

 

              Additional  Retained  Accumulated
Other
  Non-controlling
Interests of
  Non-controlling
Interests of
 

Shares Outstanding

    Preferred  Common  Paid-in  Earnings  Comprehensive  Consolidated  Host Hotels & 

Preferred

  Common    Stock  Stock  Capital  (Deficit)  Income (Loss)  Partnerships  Resorts, L.P 
 4.0    525.3   

Balance, December 31, 2008

 $97   $5   $5,868   $(385 $5   $24   $158  
 —      —     

Net loss

  —      —      —      (252  —      (1  (5
 —      —     

Unrealized loss on common stock

  —      —      —      —      (4  —      —    
 —      —     

Other changes in ownership

  —      —      (19  —      —      —      19  
 —      —     

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates

  —      —      —      —      15    —      —    
 —      —     

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

  —      —      —      —      (4  —      —    
 —      103.8   

Common stock issuances

  —      1    766    —      —      —      —    
 —      .4   

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

  —      —      6    —      —      —      —    
 —      —     

Common stock dividends – cash

  —      —      —      (16  —      —      —    
 —      13.4   

Common stock dividends – shares

  —      —      139    (139  —      —      —    
 —      —     

Dividends on preferred stock

  —      —      —      (9  —      —      —    
 —      —     

Issuance of 2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures

  —      —      82    —      —      —      —    
 —      3.4   

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

  —      —      33    —      —      —      (33
 —      —     

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

  —      —      —      —      —      1    —    
 —      —     

Distributions to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

  —      —      —      —      —      (2  —    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 4.0    646.3   

Balance, December 31, 2009

 $97   $6   $6,875   $(801 $12   $22   $139  
 —      —     

Net loss

  —      —      —      (130  —      —      (2
 —      —     

Other changes in ownership

  —      —      (69  —      —      —      69  
 —      —     

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates

  —      —      —      —      8    —     
 —      —     

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

  —      —      —      —      5    —      —    
 —      26.9   

Common stock issuances

  —      1    405    —      —      —      —    
 —      1.2   

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

  —      —      10    —      —      —      —    
 —      —     

Common stock dividends– cash

  —      —      —      (26  —      —      —    
 —      —     

Dividends on preferred stock

  —      —      —      (4  —      —      —    
 (4.0)    —     

Redemption of preferred stock

  (97  —      —      (4  —      —      —    
 —      1.2   

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

  —      —      15    —      —      —      (15
 —      —     

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

  —      —      —      —      —      11    —    
 —      —     

Distributions to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

  —      —      —      —      —      (4  —    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 —      675.6   

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $—     $7   $7,236   $(965 $25   $29   $191  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(in millions)

 

              Additional  Retained  Accumulated
Other
  Non-controlling
Interests of
  Non-controlling
Interests of
 

Shares Outstanding

    Preferred  Common  Paid-in  Earnings  Comprehensive  Consolidated  Host Hotels & 

Preferred

  Common    Stock  Stock  Capital  (Deficit)  Income (Loss)  Partnerships  Resorts, L.P 
 —      675.6   

Balance, December 31, 2010

 $ —     $7   $7,236   $(965 $25   $29   $191  
 —      —     

Net loss

  —      —      —      (15  —      (1  —    
 —      —     

Other changes in ownership

  —      —      33    —      —      —      (33
 —      —     

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive loss of unconsolidated affiliates

  —      —      —      —      (27  —      —    
 —      —     

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

  —      —      —      —      1    —      —    
 —      27.9   

Common stock issuances

  —      —      459    —      —      —      —    
 —      —     

Common OP unit issuances

   —      —      —      —      —      6  
 —      1.3   

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

  —      —      17    —      —      —      —    
 —      —     

Common stock dividends–cash

  —      —      —      (99  —      —      —    
 —      0.3   

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

  —      —      5    —      —      —      (5
 —      —     

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

  —      —      —      —      —      12    —    
 —      —     

Distributions to non-controlling interests

  —      —      —      —      —      (4  (1

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 —      705.1   

Balance, December 31, 2011

 $—     $7   $7,750   $(1,079 $(1 $36   $158  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSOPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)millions, except per common share amounts)

 

   2011  2010  2009 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net loss

  $(16 $(132 $(258

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations:

    

Discontinued operations:

    

(Gain) loss on dispositions

   —      2    (26

Depreciation

   3    2    90  

Depreciation and amortization

   652    591    613  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   11    12    14  

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net

   19    31    31  

Deferred income taxes

   (11  (36  (38

Net gains on property transactions and other

   (7  (1  (14

(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

   (3  6    (5

Non-cash loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

   4    1    (5

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

   (4  1    32  

Distributions from equity investments

   —      2    1  

Change in due from managers

   —      (9  34  

Change in cash restricted for operating activities

   —      (25  —    

Changes in other assets

   (9  44    (12

Changes in other liabilities

   22    31    95  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

   661    520    552  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Proceeds from sales of assets, net

   6    12    199  

Acquisitions

   (1,047  (342  —    

Deposits for acquisitions

   —      (38  —    

Proceeds from transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II

   40    —      —    

Proceeds from sale of interest in CBM Joint Venture LLC

   —      —      13  

Deferred sale proceeds received from HPT

   —      17    —    

Investment in affiliates

   (49  (1  (7

Return of capital from investments

   1    —      39  

Purchase of mortgage note on portfolio of hotels

   —      (53  —    

Capital expenditures:

    

Renewals and replacements

   (327  (195  (164

Redevelopment and other investments

   (215  (114  (176

Change in furniture, fixtures & equipment (FF&E) replacement fund

   4    (17  (6

Change in FF&E replacement funds designated as restricted cash

   —      22    (14

Property insurance proceeds

   11    3    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash used in investing activities

   (1,576  (706  (116
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Financing costs

   (23  (10  (20

Issuances of debt

   955    500    906  

Draws on credit facility

   153    56    —    

Repayment on credit facility

   (90  —      (410

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures

   (404  (821  (139

Mortgage debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

   (210  (364  (342

Scheduled principal repayments

   (5  (13  (14

Common stock issuance

   323    406    767  

Redemption of preferred stock

   —      (101  —    

Dividends on common stock

   (70  (20  (42

Dividends on preferred stock

   —      (6  (9

Distributions to non-controlling interests

   (5  (4  (3

Contributions from non-controlling interests

   1    11    —    

Change in cash restricted for financing activities

   3    23    4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   628    (343  698  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (287  (529  1,134  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

   1,113    1,642    508  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

  $826   $1,113   $1,642  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,452

 

 

$

3,317

 

 

$

3,082

 

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

Other

 

 

356

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

558

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

5,354

 

 

 

5,166

 

 

 

5,059

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

924

 

 

 

894

 

 

 

836

 

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,109

 

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1,049

 

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,264

 

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

Management fees

 

 

227

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

199

 

 

Other property-level expenses

 

 

386

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

576

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

701

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

 

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

43

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

107

 

 

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

4,644

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

4,697

 

 

OPERATING PROFIT

 

 

710

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

 

Interest income

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(214

)

 

 

(304

)

 

 

(373

)

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

236

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

(1

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

(4

)

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

 

 

26

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

761

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

23

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(31

)

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

747

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

NET INCOME

 

 

747

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS,

     INC.

 

$

732

 

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.27

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.08

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.96

 

 

$

.27

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

.96

 

 

$

.42

 

 

$

.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

(in millions)

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

NET INCOME

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive

   income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

(60

)

 

 

(18

)

 

 

20

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

19

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(7

)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

13

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

706

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

76

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST

     HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

 

$

691

 

 

$

296

 

 

$

74

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBISIDARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

(in millions)

Common Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional Paid-in Capital

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Retained Earnings / (Deficit)

 

 

Non-controlling Interest of Other Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

705.1

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

7

 

 

$

7,750

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(1,079

)

 

$

36

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(3

)

 

724.6

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

7

 

 

$

8,040

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

(1,234

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.7

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

1

 

 

 

476

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(346

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(4

)

 

754.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,492

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

(1,263

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(6

)

 

755.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,476

 

 

$

(50

)

 

$

(1,098

)

 

$

32

 

 

$

225

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

(97

)

 

 

(48

)

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

32

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

701

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

Amortization of finance costs, discounts and premiums, net

 

 

24

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

13

 

Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

2

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

9

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

22

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

16

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(1

)

 

 

6

 

 

 

17

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(236

)

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(13

)

(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

1

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

4

 

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

 

 

(26

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

Change in due from managers

 

 

(17

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

(42

)

Change in restricted cash for operating activities

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in other assets

 

 

(34

)

 

 

39

 

 

 

11

 

Changes in other liabilities

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

1

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,150

 

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

781

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of assets, net

 

 

497

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

160

 

Return of investment in affiliates

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Acquisitions

 

 

(138

)

 

 

(166

)

 

 

(441

)

Deferred sale proceeds received from HPT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(74

)

 

 

(132

)

Return on mortgage loan investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewals and replacements

 

 

(324

)

 

 

(303

)

 

 

(366

)

Redevelopment and acquisition-related investments

 

 

(112

)

 

 

(133

)

 

 

(272

)

New development

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(6

)

Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment ("FF&E") replacement fund

 

 

18

 

 

 

(23

)

 

 

16

 

Property insurance proceeds

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

Cash used in investing activities

 

 

(93

)

 

 

(75

)

 

 

(886

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(18

)

Issuances of debt

 

 

4

 

 

 

550

 

 

 

900

 

Draws on credit facility

 

 

4

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

231

 

Term loan issuance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Repayment of credit facility

 

 

(225

)

 

 

(207

)

 

 

(89

)

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes

 

 

(150

)

 

 

(801

)

 

 

(1,795

)

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(113

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Issuance of common stock

 

 

4

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

Dividends on common stock

 

 

(469

)

 

 

(313

)

 

 

(187

)

Contributions from non-controlling interests

 

 

1

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(7

)

Change in restricted cash for financing activities

 

 

7

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Cash used in financing activities

 

 

(1,226

)

 

 

(493

)

 

 

(305

)

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash held

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

(177

)

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

 

861

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

826

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 

$

684

 

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

(in millions)

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

During 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, Host Inc. issued approximately 0.3 million, 1.20.3 million and 3.40.6 million shares of common stock, respectively, upon the conversion of Host L.P. units, or OP units, held by non-controlling interests valued at $5$6 million, $15$6 million and $18$10 million, respectively.

In June 2011,March 2013, holders of approximately $134$174 million of the 3.25% Exchangeable Debentures elected to exchange their debentures for approximately 8.811.7 million shares of Host Inc. common stock.

On June 28, 2011,In November 2012, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II atcontributed land with a pricebook value of £64$11 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. We also transferred the capital lease asset and corresponding liability associated with the building, each valued at £38 million ($61 million), to the Euro JV Fund II. We retained a 33.4% interest in the property through our general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV Fund II and received cash proceeds on the transfer of £25 million ($40 million). We acquired a leasehold interest in the property in July 2010, at which time we assumed the mortgage loan and recorded the capital lease obligation.

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% controlling interest in the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed A$80 million ($86 million) of mortgage debt and recorded such mortgage debt at its fair value at the acquisition date.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego, and certain related rights. In connection with the acquisition, Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. issued approximately 0.3 million OP units valued at approximately $6 million.

On September 2, 2010, we acquired a 90% controlling interest in the W New York, Union Square hotel. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed a $115 million mortgage debt with a fair value of $119 million, and other liabilities of $8.5 million.

On December 18, 2009, Host Inc. issued 13.4 million shares of common stock valued at $140$36 million to its stockholders as parta joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group to develop a vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii. We recorded an initial investment of a special common dividend.$8 million related to our 67% ownership in the joint venture and an initial gain of $8 million related to the portion of the land attributable to Hyatt Residential Group’s 33% interest, for which we received cash of $12 million.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 20112014 and 20102013

(in millions)

 

  2011 2010 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

ASSETS   

ASSETS

 

Property and equipment, net

  $11,383   $10,514  

 

$

10,575

 

 

$

10,995

 

Due from managers

   37    45  

 

 

70

 

 

 

52

 

Investments in affiliates

   197    148  

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

433

 

 

 

415

 

Deferred financing costs, net

   55    44  

 

 

35

 

 

 

42

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund

   166    152  

 

 

129

 

 

 

173

 

Other

   368    353  

 

 

281

 

 

 

244

 

Restricted cash

   36    41  

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   826    1,113  

 

 

684

 

 

 

861

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $13,068   $12,410  

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL   

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL

 

Debt

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes, including $902 million and $1,156 million, respectively, net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

  $4,543   $4,249  

Credit facility

   117    58  

Senior notes, including $386 million and $371 million, respectively,

net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

2,884

 

 

$

3,018

 

Credit facility, including the $500 million term loan

 

 

704

 

 

 

946

 

Mortgage debt

   1,006    1,025  

 

 

404

 

 

 

709

 

Other

   87    145  

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total debt

   5,753    5,477  

 

 

3,992

 

 

 

4,759

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   175    161  

 

 

298

 

 

 

214

 

Other

   269    250  

 

 

324

 

 

 

389

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   6,197    5,888  

 

 

4,614

 

 

 

5,362

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited partnership interest of third parties.

   158    191  

Limited partnership interests of third parties

 

 

225

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. capital:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

   1    1  

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Limited partner

   6,677    6,276  

 

 

7,385

 

 

 

7,236

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   (1  25  
  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(9

)

Total Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. capital

   6,677    6,302  

 

 

7,336

 

 

 

7,228

 

Non-controlling interests—consolidated partnerships

   36    29  

 

 

32

 

 

 

34

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total capital

   6,713    6,331  

 

 

7,368

 

 

 

7,262

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities, limited partnership interest of third parties and capital

  $13,068   $12,410  

 

$

12,207

 

 

$

12,814

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions, except per common unit amounts)

 

  2011 2010 2009 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

REVENUES

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

  $3,022   $2,661   $2,484  

 

$

3,452

 

 

$

3,317

 

 

$

3,082

 

Food and beverage

   1,427    1,291    1,234  

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,419

 

Other

   296    277    310  

 

 

356

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

558

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Owned hotel revenues

   4,745    4,229    4,028  

Other revenues

   253    199    107  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenues

   4,998    4,428    4,135  

 

 

5,354

 

 

 

5,166

 

 

 

5,059

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EXPENSES

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

   832    734    681  

 

 

924

 

 

 

894

 

 

 

836

 

Food and beverage

   1,062    965    933  

 

 

1,109

 

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1,049

 

Other departmental and support expenses

   1,261    1,151    1,099  

 

 

1,264

 

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1,219

 

Management fees

   189    171    158  

 

 

227

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

199

 

Other property-level expenses

   569    488    386  

 

 

386

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

576

 

Depreciation and amortization

   652    591    613  

 

 

701

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

Corporate and other expenses

   111    108    116  

 

 

43

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

107

 

Gain on insurance settlement

   (2  (3  —    
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Total operating costs and expenses

   4,674    4,205    3,986  

 

 

4,644

 

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

4,697

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

OPERATING PROFIT

   324    223    149  

 

 

710

 

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

Interest income

   20    8    7  

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

Interest expense

   (371  (384  (379

 

 

(214

)

 

 

(304

)

 

 

(373

)

Net gains on property transactions and other

   7    1    14  

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

236

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

   3    (6  5  

 

 

(1

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

(4

)

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

   4    (1  (32

 

 

26

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   (13  (159  (236

Benefit for income taxes

   1    31    39  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   (12  (128  (197

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax.

   (4  (4  (61
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET LOSS

   (16  (132  (258

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   1    —      1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

   (15  (132  (257

Less: Distributions on preferred units

   —      (4  (9

Issuance costs of redeemed preferred units

   —      (4  —    
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS

  $(15 $(140 $(266
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic loss per common unit:

    

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

761

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

23

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(31

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

747

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

NET INCOME

 

 

747

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS &

RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

741

 

 

$

321

 

 

$

62

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

  $(.01 $(.21 $(.34

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.28

 

 

$

(.01

)

Discontinued operations

   (.01  —      (.10

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic loss per common unit

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.44
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted loss per common unit:

    

Basic earnings per common unit

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

  $(.01 $(.21 $(.35

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.28

 

 

$

(.01

)

Discontinued operations

   (.01  —      (.10

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted loss per common unit

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)

 

   2011  2010  2009 

NET LOSS

  $(16 $(132 $(258

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

    

Unrealized loss on HMS Host common stock

   —      —      (4

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

   (27  8    15  

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

   1    5    (4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX.

   (26  13    7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

   (42  (119  (251
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non- controlling interests

   1    —      1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

  $(41 $(119 $(250
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

NET INCOME

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive

   income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

(60

)

 

 

(18

)

 

 

20

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

19

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(7

)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

13

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

706

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

76

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO

     HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

700

 

 

$

300

 

 

$

75

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBISIDARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)

 

           

Preferred

Limited

   

General

   

Limited

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  

Non-controlling

Interests of

Consolidated

  

Limited

Partnership

Interests of

 

OP Units Outstanding

            

Preferred

   

Common

     

Partner

   

Partner

   

Partner

  

Income (Loss)

  

Partnerships

  

Third Parties

 
 4.0     525.3    

Balance, December 31, 2008

  $97    $1    $5,485   $5   $24   $158  
 —       —      

Net loss

   —       —       (252  —      (1  (5
 —       —      

Unrealized loss on HMS Host common stock

   —       —       —      (4  —      —    
 —       —      

Other changes in ownership

   —       —       (19  —      —      19  
 —       —      

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates

   —       —       —      15    —      —    
 —       —      

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

   —       —       —      (4  —      —    
 —       103.6    

Common OP unit issuances

   —       —       767    —      —      —    
 —       .4    

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

   —       —       6    —      —      —    
 —       —      

Distributions on common OP units

   —       —       (16  —      —      —    
 —       —      

Distributions on preferred OP units

   —       —       (9  —      —      —    
 —       —      

Issuance of 2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures

   —       —       82    —      —      —    
 —       3.4    

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

   —       —       33    —      —      (33
 —       —      

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

   —       —       —      —      1    —    
 —       —      

Distributions to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

   —       —       —      —      (2  —    

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 4.0     632.7    

Balance, December 31, 2009

  $97    $1    $6,077   $12   $22   $139  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBISIDARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL—(continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(in millions)

           

Preferred

Limited

  

General

   

Limited

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  

Non-controlling

Interests of

Consolidated

  

Limited

Partnership

Interests of

 

OP Units Outstanding

           

Preferred

   

Common

     

Partner

  

Partner

   

Partner

  

Income (Loss)

  

Partnerships

  

Third Parties

 
 4.0     632.7    

Balance, December 31, 2009

  $97   $1    $ 6,077   $12   $22   $ 139  
 —       —      

Net loss

   —      —       (130  —      —      (2
 —       —      

Other changes in ownership

   —      —       (69  —      —      69  
 —       —      

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates

   —      —       —      8    —      —    
 —       —      

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

   —      —       —      5    —      —    
 —       26.4    

Common OP unit issuances

   —      —       407    —      —      —    
 —       1.1    

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

   —      —       10    —      —      —    
 —       —      

Distribution on common OP unit

   —      —       (26  —      —      —    
 —       —      

Distribution on preferred OP unit

   —      —       (4  —      —      —    
 (4.0)     —      

Redemption of preferred units

   (97  —       (4  —      —      —    
 —       1.2    

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

   —      —       15    —      —      (15
 —       —      

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

   —      —       —      —      11    —    
 —       —      

Distributions to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

   —      —       —      —      (4  —    

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 —       661.4    

Balance, December 31, 2010

  $—     $1    $6,276   $25   $29   $191  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 —       —      

Net loss

   —      —       (15  —      (1  —    
 —       —      

Other changes in ownership

   —      —       33    —      —      (33
 —       —      

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive loss of unconsolidated affiliates

   —      —       —      (27  —      —    
 —       —      

Change in fair value of

derivative instruments

   —      —       —      1    —      —    
 —       27.3    

Common OP unit issuances

   —      —       460    —      —      6  
 —       1.3    

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

   —      —       17    —      —      —    
 —       —      

Distribution on common OP unit

   —      —       (99  —      —      —    
 —       0.3    

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

   —      —       5    —      —      (5
 —       —      

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

   —      —       —      —      12    —    
 —       —      

Distributions to non-controlling interests

   —      —       —      —      (4  (1

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 —       690.3    

Balance, December 31, 2011

  $—     $1    $6,677   $(1 $36   $158  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Common OP Units Outstanding

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

 

Limited Partner

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties

 

 

690.3

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

1

 

 

$

6,677

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

36

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

709.4

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

1

 

 

$

6,812

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.1

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(346

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

 

 

738.9

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,236

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

 

 

739.9

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,385

 

 

$

(50

)

 

$

32

 

 

$

225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)

 

  2011 2010 2009 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(16 $(132 $(258

Net income

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Gain) loss on dispositions

   —      2    (26

Gain on dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

(97

)

 

 

(48

)

Depreciation

   3    2    90  

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

32

 

Depreciation and amortization

   652    591    613  

 

 

701

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   11    12    14  

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net

   19    31    31  

Amortization of finance costs, discounts and premiums, net

 

 

24

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

13

 

Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

2

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

9

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

22

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

16

 

Deferred income taxes

   (11  (36  (38

 

 

(1

)

 

 

6

 

 

 

17

 

Net gains on property transactions and other

   (7  (1  (14

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(236

)

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(13

)

(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

   (3  6    (5

 

 

1

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

4

 

Non-cash loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

   4    1    (5

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

   (4  1    32  

 

 

(26

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

Distributions from equity investments

   —      2    1  

Change in due from managers

   —      (9  34  

 

 

(17

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

(42

)

Change in cash restricted for operating activities

   —      (25  —    

Change in restricted cash for operating activities

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in other assets

   (9  44    (12

 

 

(34

)

 

 

39

 

 

 

11

 

Changes in other liabilities

   22    31    95  

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

1

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

   661    520    552  

 

 

1,150

 

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

781

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of assets, net

   6    12    199  

 

 

497

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

160

 

Return of investment in affiliates

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Acquisitions

   (1,047  (342  —    

 

 

(138

)

 

 

(166

)

 

 

(441

)

Deposits for acquisitions

   —      (38  —    

Proceeds from transfer of Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II

   40    —      —    

Proceeds from sale of interest in CBM Joint Venture LLC

   —      —      13  

Deferred sale proceeds received from HPT

   —      17    —    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51

 

Investment in affiliates

   (49  (1  (7

Return of capital from investments in affiliates

   1    —      39  

Purchase of mortgage note on a portfolio of hotels

   —      (53  —    

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(74

)

 

 

(132

)

Return on mortgage loan investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

Capital expenditures:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewals and replacements

   (327  (195  (164

 

 

(324

)

 

 

(303

)

 

 

(366

)

Redevelopment and other investments

   (215  (114  (176

Change in furniture, fixtures & equipment (FF&E) replacement fund

   4    (17  (6

Change in FF&E replacement funds designated as restricted cash

   —      22    (14

Redevelopment and acquisition-related investments

 

 

(112

)

 

 

(133

)

 

 

(272

)

New development

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(6

)

Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment ("FF&E") replacement fund

 

 

18

 

 

 

(23

)

 

 

16

 

Property insurance proceeds

   11    3    —    

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash used in investing activities

   (1,576  (706  (116

 

 

(93

)

 

 

(75

)

 

 

(886

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs

   (23  (10  (20

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(18

)

Issuances of debt

   955    500    906  

 

 

4

 

 

 

550

 

 

 

900

 

Draws on credit facility

   153    56    —    

 

 

4

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

231

 

Repayment on credit facility

   (90  —      (410

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures

   (404  (821  (139

Mortgage debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

   (210  (364  (342

Term loan issuance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Repayment of credit facility

 

 

(225

)

 

 

(207

)

 

 

(89

)

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes

 

 

(150

)

 

 

(801

)

 

 

(1,795

)

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(113

)

Scheduled principal repayments

   (5  (13  (14

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Common OP unit issuance

   323    406    767  

Redemption of preferred OP units

   —      (101  —    

Issuance of common OP units

 

 

4

 

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

Distributions on common OP units

   (71  (20  (43

 

 

(475

)

 

 

(317

)

 

 

(190

)

Distributions on preferred OP units

   —      (6  (9

Contributions from non-controlling interests

 

 

1

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

   (4  (4  (2

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(4

)

Contributions from non-controlling interests

   1    11    —    

Change in cash restricted for financing activities

   3    23    4  

Change in restricted cash for financing activities

 

 

7

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Cash used in financing activities

 

 

(1,226

)

 

 

(493

)

 

 

(305

)

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash held

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

(177

)

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

 

861

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

826

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 

$

684

 

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   628    (343  698  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (287  (529  1,134  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

   1,113    1,642    508  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

  $826   $1,113   $1,642  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(in millions)

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

During 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, non-controlling partners converted common operating partnership units (“OP units”) valued at $5$6 million, $15$6 million and $18$10 million, respectively, in exchange for 0.3 million, 1.20.3 million and 3.40.6 million shares, respectively, of Host Inc. common stock.

In June 2011,March 2013, holders of approximately $134$174 million of the 3.25% Exchangeable Debentures elected to exchange their debentures for approximately 8.811.7 million shares of Host Inc. common stock.

On June 28, 2011, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II at a price of £64 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. We also transferred the capital lease asset and corresponding liability associated with the building, each valued at £38 million ($61 million), to the Euro JV Fund II. We retained a 33.4% interest in the property through our general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV Fund II and received cash proceeds on the transfer of £25 million ($40 million). We acquired a leasehold interest in the property in July 2010, at which time we assumed the mortgage loan and recorded the capital lease obligation.

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% controlling interest in the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed A$80 million ($86 million) of mortgage debt and recorded such mortgage debt at its fair value at the acquisition date.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego, and certain related rights. In connection with the acquisition,debentures exchanged for Host Hotels & Resorts,Inc. common stock, Host L.P. issued approximately 0.311.5 million common OP units valued at approximately $6 million.units.

On September 2, 2010,In November 2012, we acquiredcontributed land with a 90% controlling interest in the W New York, Union Square hotel. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed a $115book value of $11 million mortgage debt withand a fair value of $119$36 million to a joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group to develop a vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii. We recorded an initial investment of $8 million related to our 67% ownership in the joint venture and other liabilitiesan initial gain of $8.5$8 million related to the portion of the land attributable to Hyatt Residential Group’s 33% interest, for which we received cash of $12 million.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

98


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, with its operations conducted solely through Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and its subsidiaries. Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, operates through an umbrella partnership structure, with Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a Maryland corporation, as its sole general partner. In the notes to the financial statements, we use the terms “we” or “our” to refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. together, unless the context indicates otherwise. We also use the term “Host Inc.” to refer specifically to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and the term “Host L.P.” to refer specifically to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (and its consolidated subsidiaries) in cases where it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P. Host Inc. holds approximately 98.5%99% of Host L.P.’s partnership interests, or OP units.

Consolidated Portfolio

As of December 31, 2011,2014, the hotels in our lodgingconsolidated portfolio are located in the United States consisted of 105 hotels with approximately 60,700 rooms. Our U.S. portfolio is geographically diverse, with hotels in cities in 25 states and in Washington, D.C. We also own 16 hotels with approximately 4,300 rooms in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico and New Zealand. Additionally, we own an approximate one-third interest in a following countries:

Hotels

United States

97

Australia

1

Brazil

3

Canada

3

Chile

2

Mexico

1

New Zealand

7

Total

114

European joint venture that owns 13 hotels with approximately 4,200 rooms located in Belgium, France, Italy, Poland, The Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. Joint Venture

We are the general partner of the joint venture and act as asset manager for these hotels. We also own a 25% interest in an Asian joint venture that has acquired a 36%non-controlling interest in a joint venture to develop seven propertiesin Europe (“Euro JV”) that owns hotels in two separate funds. We own a 32.1% interest in the first fund (“Euro JV Fund I”) (10 hotels) and a 33.4% interest in the second fund (“Euro JV Fund II”) (9 hotels).

As of December 31, 2014, the Euro JV hotels are located in the following countries:

Hotels

Belgium

3

France

4

Germany

2

Italy

3

Poland

1

Spain

2

Sweden

1

The Netherlands

2

United Kingdom

1

Total

19

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

We own a 25% non-controlling interest in a joint venture in Asia (“Asia/Pacific JV”) that owns the 278-room Four Points by Sheraton, Perth, in Australia. The Asia/Pacific JV also owns a non-controlling interest in a joint venture in India by 2014.that is investing in seven hotels, two in Bangalore, one in Chennai and four that are in various stages of development.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Host Inc., Host L.P. and their subsidiaries and controlled affiliates, including joint ventures and partnerships. We consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability to directcontrol the activities that most significantly impactentity. For the economic performancemajority of the entity.our hotel and real estate investments, we consider those control rights to be (i) approval or

99


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

amendment of developments plans, (ii) financing decisions, (iii) approval or amendments of operating budgets, and (iv) investment strategy decisions. For those partnerships and joint ventures where we are the general partner, we review the rights of the limited partners to determine if those rights would overcome the assumptionpresumption of control as the general partner. Limited partner rights which would overcome presumption of control by the general partner include the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause and substantive participating rights over activities considered most significant to the business of the partnership or joint venture, primarily voting rights.

We also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they should be consideredare variable interest entities (“VIEs”). If a subsidiary is a VIE, it is subject to the consolidation framework specifically for VIEs. Typically, the entity that has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance would consolidate the VIE. We consider an entity a VIE if equity investors own an interest therein that does not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. In accordance with ASC 810, we reviewedWe review our subsidiaries and affiliates at least annually to determine if (i) they should be considered VIEs, and (ii) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in the characteristics of these entities.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 daysthree months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, insurance, and furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement, as well as cash collateral and excess cash flow deposits due to mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions, and a reserve required for potential legal damages. For purposes of the statements of cash flows, changes in restricted cash caused by changes in required legal reserves are shown as operating activities. Changes in restricted cash caused by using such funds for furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement are shown as investing activities. The remaining changes in restricted cash are the direct result of restrictions under our loan agreements and as such, are reflected in cash flows from financing activities.

Property and Equipment

Generally, property and equipment is recorded at cost. For properties we develop, cost includes interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. For property and equipment acquired in a business combination, we record the assets based on their fair value as of the acquisition date. Replacements and improvements and capital leases are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. We depreciate our property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the useful lives of the related assets.

We capitalize certain inventory (such as china, glass, silver, and linen) at the time of a hotel opening or acquisition, or when significant inventory is purchased (in conjunction with a major rooms renovation or when the number of rooms or meeting space at a hotel is expanded). These amounts are then amortized over the estimated useful life of three years. Subsequent replacement purchases are expensed when placed in service.

We maintain a furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund for renewal and replacement capital expenditures at certain hotels, which generally is funded with 5% of property revenues.

Impairment testing.  We analyze our assetsconsolidated properties for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider a property to be impaired when the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows over our remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying value of the asset. We test for impairment in several situations, including when a property has a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other events, trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred and the carrying value of an asset may not be

100


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

recoverable. For impaired assets, we record an impairment chargeexpense equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value of the asset over its fair value. To the extent that a property has a substantial remaining estimated useful life and management does not believe that it is more likely than not the property will be disposed of prior to the end of its useful life, it would be unusual for undiscounted cash flows to be insufficient to recover the property’s carrying value. In the absence of other factors, we assume that the estimated life is equal to the GAAP depreciable life because of the continuous property maintenance and improvement capital expenditures required under our management agreements. We adjust our assumptions with respect to the remaining useful life of the property if situations dictate otherwise, such as an expiring ground lease, or that it is more likely than not that the asset will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life. We also consider the effect of regular renewal and replacement capital expenditures on the estimated life of our properties, including critical infrastructure, which regularly is maintained and then replaced at the end of its useful life.

In the evaluation of the impairment of our assets, we make many assumptions and estimates, including assumptionsincluding:

·

projected cash flows, both from operations and the eventual disposition;

·

the expected useful life and holding period of the asset;

·

the future required capital expenditures; and

·

fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates and comparable selling prices, as well as available third-party appraisals.

While we consider all of the above indicators as preliminary indicators to determine if the carrying value may not be recovered by undiscounted cash flows, we reviewed the actual year-to-date and the projected cash flows both from operations in order to identify properties with actual or projected annual operating losses or minimal operating profit as of December 31, 2014. The projected cash flows consider items such as booking pace, occupancy, room rate and property-level operating costs. As a result of our review, we identified two properties that required further consideration of property and market specific conditions or factors to determine if the eventual disposition,property was impaired using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. Management considered a range of RevPAR and operating margins compared to prior years’ operating results in evaluating the expected useful life and holding periodprobability-weighted projected cash flows from operations. To appropriately evaluate if the carrying value of the asset,assets was recoverable, we projected cash flows such that the futureindividual properties would return to normalized levels of operations generally within five years and thereafter grow at a stabilized rate of approximately 3% over the remaining estimated lives of the properties. This stabilized growth rate is lower than the projected growth rate for the urban upper upscale properties, which we believe is most representative of our portfolio, over the period from 2013 through 2023. Based on this testing, none of the properties previously identified required capital expendituresfurther analysis. Management believes its assumptions and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount ratesestimates reflect current market conditions. During 2014, 2013 and comparable selling prices. During 2011,2012, we recognized impairment chargesexpenses of $8$6 million, $1 million and $60 million, respectively, on two propertiesone property each year, which impairment expenses are included in depreciation and amortization, based on a changechanges in estimated hold period. Oneholding periods.

Classification of the properties was disposed of in 2011.

Assets as “Held for Sale”.We will classify a hotel as held for sale when the sale of the assetthereof is probable, will be completed within one year and actions to complete the sale are unlikely to change or that the sale will not occur. Accordingly, we typically classify assets as held for sale when Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has approved the sale, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signedThis policy is consistent with our experience with real estate transactions under which the timing and final terms of a sale are frequently not known until purchase agreements are executed, the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash,deposit at risk and no significant financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner. We typically classify assets as held for sale when all of the following conditions are met:

·

Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has approved the sale (to the extent that the dollar amount of the sale requires Board approval);

·

a binding agreement to sell the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash; and

·

no significant financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner.

If these criteria are met, we will cease recording depreciation and will record an impairment lossexpense if the fair value less costs to sell is less than the carrying amount of the hotel. We will classify the loss, together with the related operating results, including interest expense on debt assumed by the buyer or that is required to be repaid as a result of the sale, as discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations and classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet. Gains on sales of properties are recognized at the time of sale or deferred and recognized as income in subsequent periods as conditions requiring deferral are satisfied or expire without further cost to us.

Discontinued Operations. In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360) - Reporting Discontinued

101


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Operations and Disclosure of Disposal of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08 Reporting for Discontinued Operations”). Under this standard, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations only if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.  In addition, it requires an entity to present, for each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position. As a result, the operations through the date of disposal and the gain or loss on sale of properties will be included in continuing operations, unless the sale represents a strategic shift. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2014. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.

Asset retirement obligations.We recognize the fair value of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations, including environmental remediation liabilities, when incurred, which generally is upon acquisition, construction, or development and/or through the normal operation of the asset, if sufficient information exists with which to reasonably estimate the fair value of the obligation.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets and amortization expense for leasehold improvements is based on the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. The lives of the assets are based on a number of assumptions, including cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish the assets, as well as specific market and economic conditions. While management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels.

Intangible Assets and Liabilities

In conjunction with our acquisitions, we may identify intangible assets.assets and liabilities. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities typically include contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. These contract values are based on the present value of the difference between contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the contracts acquired and our estimate of the fair value of contract rates for corresponding contracts measured over the period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the contract. Intangible assets and liabilities are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related agreements.

Non-Controlling Interests

Other Consolidated Partnerships.As of December 31, 2011,2014, we consolidate fivesix majority-owned partnerships that have third-party, non-controlling ownership interests. The third-party partnership interests are included in non-controlling interest-other consolidated partnerships on the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $36$32 million and $29$34 million as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively. ThreeTwo of the partnerships have finite lives ranging from 99 to 100 years that terminate between 2081 and 2095, and the associated non-controlling interests are mandatorily redeemable at the end of, but not prior to, the finite life. At December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, the fair values of the non-controlling interests in the partnerships with finite lives were approximately $67$85 million and $65$68 million, respectively.

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships is included in our determination of net income (loss). Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests of third parties of $(1)is $6 million, $0.4$4 million and $(1)$1 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009, respectively, is included in the determination of net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc. and Host L.P.2012, respectively.

Host Inc.’s treatment of the non-controlling interests of Host L.P.Host Inc. adjusts the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. each period so that the amount presented equals the greater of its carrying value based on theits historical cost or its redemption value. The historical cost is based on the proportional relationship between the historical cost of equity held by our common stockholders relative to that of the unitholders of Host L.P. The redemption value is based on the amount of cash or Host Inc. stock, at our option, that would be paid to the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. if it were terminated. Therefore, weWe have assumedestimated that the redemption value is equivalent to the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the outside OP units currently owned by unrelated third parties (one OP unit may be exchanged for 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock) valued at the market price of Host Inc. common stock at the balance sheet date. Subsequent to the stock dividend issued in 2009 (see Note 5 “Equity of Host Inc. and Capital of Host L.P.”), one OP unit now may be exchanged into 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock. Non-controlling interests of Host L.P. are classified in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet as they do not meet the requirements for equity classification because the redemption feature requires the delivery of registered shares.

102


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below details the historical cost and redemption values for the non-controlling interests (in millions):interests:

 

  As of December 31, 

 

As of December 31,

 

  2011   2010 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

OP units outstanding (millions)

   10.5     10.5  

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

9.5

 

Market price per Host Inc. common share

  $14.77    $17.87  

 

$

23.77

 

 

$

19.44

 

Shares issuable upon conversion of one OP unit

   1.021494     1.021494  

 

 

1.021494

 

 

 

1.021494

 

Redemption value (millions)

  $158    $191  

 

$

225

 

 

$

190

 

Historical cost (millions)

  $102    $101  

 

 

94

 

 

 

95

 

Book value (millions) (1)

  $158    $191  

 

 

225

 

 

 

190

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)The book value recorded is equal to the greater of the redemption value or the historical cost.

(1)The book value recorded is equal to the greater of the redemption value or the historical cost.

Net income (loss) is allocated to the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. based on their weighted average ownership percentage during the period. Net lossincome attributable to Host Inc. has been reduced by the amount attributable to non-controlling interests in Host L.P., which totaled $2$9 million, $4 million and $5$1 million for 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Distributions from Investments in Affiliates

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of an Investment.We classify the distributions from our equity investments in the statements of cash flows based uponperform an evaluation of the specific facts and circumstances of each distribution. For example, distributions from cash generated by property operations are classified as cash flows from operating activities. However, distributions received as a result of property sales are classified as cash flows from investing activities.

Other-than-Temporary Impairments

We reviewanalysis for our equity method investments for impairment based on the occurrence of any triggering events that would indicate that the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. Triggering events can include a decline in distributable cash flows from the investment, a change in the expected useful life or other significant events which would decrease the value of the investment. Our investments primarily consist of joint ventures which own hotel properties; therefore, generally we generally will have few observable inputs and will determine fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the investment, as well as consideration of the impact of other elements (i.e. control premiums, etc.). We use certain inputs, such as available third-party appraisals and forecast net operating income for the hotel properties, in order to estimate the expected cash flows. If an equity method investment is impaired a lossand that impairment is determined to be other than temporary, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying valueamount of the investment. No other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2014, 2013, or 2012.

Distributions from Investments in Affiliates. We classify the distributions from our equity investments in the statements of cash flows based upon an evaluation of the specific facts and circumstances of each distribution. For example, distributions from cash generated by property operations are classified as cash flows from operating activities. However, distributions received as a result of property sales are classified as cash flows from investing activities.

Income Taxes

Host Inc. has elected to be treated as a REIT under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and, as such, is not subject to federal income tax, provided that it distributes all of its taxable income, including net capital gains, annually to its stockholders and complies with certain other requirements. In addition to paying federal and state income tax on any retained income, one of our subsidiary REITs is subject to a tax on “built-in-gains” on sales of certain assets. As a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Host L.P. is not subject to federal income tax. Host L.P. is, however, subject to state, local and foreign income and franchise tax in certain jurisdictions. In addition, each of the Host L.P. taxable REIT subsidiaries is taxable as a regular C corporation and is subject to federal, state and foreign income tax. Our consolidated income tax provision or benefit includes the income tax provision or benefit related to the operations of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, state income and franchise taxes incurred by Host Inc. and Host L.P., and foreign income taxes incurred by Host L.P., as well as each of their respective subsidiaries.

Under the partnership agreement, Host L.P. generally is required to reimburse Host Inc. for any tax payments it is required to make. Accordingly, the tax information included herein represents disclosures regarding Host Inc. and its subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted. However, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies.

Deferred Charges

Financing costs related to long-term debt are deferred and amortized over the remaining life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Foreign Currency Translation

As of December 31, 2011, our foreign operations consist of hotels located in Australia, Brazil, Chile, Canada, Mexico, and New Zealand, as well as an investment in joint ventures in Europe and Asia. The financial statements

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

of these properties and our investments therein are maintained in their functional currency, which generally is the local currency, and are translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates for the period. The assets and liabilities of the properties and the investments are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in other comprehensive income (loss).

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the functional currency for each entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured at period end exchange rates. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, except when deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as qualifying net investment hedges.

Derivative Instruments

We are subject to market exposures in several aspects of our business and may enter into derivative instruments in order to hedge the effect of these market exposures on our operations. Potential market exposures for which we may use derivative instruments to hedge include: (i) changes in the fair value of our foreign investments due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, (ii) changes in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt due to changes in the underlying interest rates, and (iii) variability in interest payments due to changes in the underlying interest rate for our floating-rate debt. Prior to entering into the derivative instrument, we evaluate whether the transaction will qualify for hedge accounting and continue to evaluate hedge effectiveness through the life of the instrument. Derivative instruments that meet the requirements for hedge accounting are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to net income (loss) or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative instruments for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and accumulated guarantees.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the balance sheets are as follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Gain on forward currency contracts

  $11   $7  

Loss on interest rate swap cash flow hedges

   (3  —    

Foreign currency translation

   (9  18  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  $(1 $25  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues

Our results of operations include revenues and expenses of our hotels. Revenues are recognized when the services are provided. Additionally, we collect sales, use, occupancy and similar taxes at our hotels, which we present on a net basis (excluded from revenues) on our statements of operations.

Host Inc. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 
   (in millions, except per share amounts) 

Net loss

  $(16 $(132 $(258

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   1    2    6  

Dividends on preferred stock

   —      (4  (9

Issuance costs of redeemed preferred stock (1)

   —      (4  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss available to common stockholders

   (15  (138  (261

Assuming deduction of gain recognized for the repurchase of 2004 Debentures (2)

   —      —      (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted loss available to common stockholders

  $(15 $(138 $(263
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

   693.0    656.1    586.3  

Assuming weighted average shares for the repurchased 2004 Debentures

   —      —      .9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (3)

   693.0    656.1    587.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic loss per share

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45

Diluted loss per share

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45

(1)Represents the original issuance costs associated with the Class E preferred stock, which stock was redeemed during 2010.
(2)

During 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of our $500 million 3 1/4% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) with a carrying value of $72 million for approximately $69 million. We are required to determine the dilutive effect of the repurchased 2004 Debentures separately from the 2004 Debentures outstanding at December 31, 2009. The 2004 Debentures repurchased during 2009 are treated as having been converted to Host Inc. common stock equivalents at the start of the period. Accordingly, the 2009 adjustments to net income related to the repurchased 2004 Debentures include a $3 million gain, net of interest expense on the repurchased debentures.

(3)There are 47 million, 53 million and 51 million potentially dilutive shares for our exchangeable senior debentures and shares granted under comprehensive stock plans which were not included in the computation of diluted EPS as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period. See Note 4 “Debt” for the terms and conditions of our exchangeable senior debentures and Note 8 “Employee Stock Plans” for the terms and conditions of our comprehensive stock plans.

Host L.P. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Unit

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common unitholders by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common unitholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common units outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include units distributed to Host Inc. to support Host Inc. common shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 
   (in millions, except per unit amounts) 

Net loss

  $(16 $(132 $(258

Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   1    —      1  

Distributions on preferred units

   —      (4  (9

Issuance costs of redeemed preferred units (1)

   —      (4  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss available to common unitholders

   (15  (140  (266

Assuming deduction of gain recognized for the repurchase of 2004 Debentures (2)

   —      —      (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted loss available to common unitholders

  $(15 $(140 $(268
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic weighted average units outstanding

   688.9    653.0    598.3  

Assuming weighted average units for the repurchased 2004 Debentures

   —      —      .9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding (3)

   688.9    653.0    599.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic loss per unit

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.44

Diluted loss per unit

  $(.02 $(.21 $(.45

(1)Represents the original issuance costs associated with the Class E preferred OP units, which units were redeemed during 2010.
(2)

During 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of our $500 million 3 1/4% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) with a carrying value of $72 million for approximately $69 million. We are required to determine the dilutive effect of the repurchased 2004 Debentures separately from the 2004 Debentures outstanding at December 31, 2009. The 2004 Debentures repurchased during 2009 are treated as having been converted to common unit equivalents at the start of the period. Accordingly, the 2009 adjustment to net income related to the repurchased 2004 Debentures include a $3 million gain, net of interest expense on the repurchased debentures.

(3)There are 46 million, 51 million and 50 million potentially dilutive units for our exchangeable senior debentures and for units distributable to Host Inc. for Host Inc. shares granted under comprehensive stock plans which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period. See Note 4 “Debt” for the terms and conditions of our Exchangeable Senior Debentures and Note 8 “Employee Stock Plans” for the terms and conditions of Host Inc.’s comprehensive stock plans.

Share-Based Payments

At December 31, 2011, Host Inc. maintained two stock-based employee compensation plans. Additionally, in connection with Host Inc.’s conversion to a REIT, Host L.P. assumed the employee obligations of Host Inc. Therefore, upon the issuance of Host’s common stock under the compensation plans, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. Accordingly, these liabilities and related disclosures are included in the consolidated financial statements for Host Inc. and Host L.P., respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility, and amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. At December 31, 2011, our exposure risk related to our derivative instruments totaled $22 million and the counterparties to such instruments are investment grade financial institutions. Our credit risk exposure with regard to our cash and the $883 million available under our credit facility is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions.

Business Combinations

We recognize identifiable assets acquired, liabilities (both specific and contingent) assumed, and non-controlling interests in a business combination at their fair values at the acquisition date based on the exit price (i.e. the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date). Furthermore, acquisition-related costs, such as due diligence, legal and accounting fees, are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair value of the acquired assets. Classification of a lease does not change if it is part of a business combination. Capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest are fair valued and included as debt on the accompanying balance sheet and wewill record the corresponding right-to-use assets. In certain situations, a deferred tax liability is created due to the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of the acquired asset at the acquisition date, which also may result in a goodwill asset being recorded.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reclassifications

Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. We have changed the presentation for comprehensive income (loss) and have presented it in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

2.Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Land and land improvements

  $1,852   $1,669  

Buildings and leasehold improvements

   13,168    12,080  

Furniture and equipment

   2,079    1,895  

Construction in progress

   196    168  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   17,295    15,812  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (5,912  (5,298
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $11,383   $10,514  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10,570 million at December 31, 2011.

3.Investments in Affiliates

We own investments in joint ventures which we do not consolidate. These investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The debt of these joint ventures is non-recourse to, and not guaranteed by, us. Investments in affiliates consist of the following (in millions):

   As of December 31, 2011
   Ownership
Interests
  Our
Investment
   Debt   

Assets

Asia Pacific Hospitality Venture Pte. Ltd.

   25.0 $15    $—      36% interest in the development of seven hotels in India

HHR Euro CV Fund I

   32.1  141     899    Eleven hotels in Europe

HHR Euro CV Fund II

   33.4  41     119    Two hotels in Europe
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   $197    $1,018    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

   As of December 31, 2010
   Ownership
Interests
  Our
Investment
  Debt   

Assets

Asia Pacific Hospitality Venture Pte. Ltd.

   25.0 $(1 $—      None

HHR Euro CV

   32.1  135    945    Eleven hotels located in Europe

Tiburon Golf Ventures, L.P.

   49.0  14    —      36-hole golf club
   

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total

   $148   $945    
   

 

 

  

 

 

   

European Joint Venture

We have general and limited partner interests in a joint venture in Europe (HHR Euro CV, or the “Euro JV”) that consists of two separate funds with APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”).We serve as the general partner for the joint venture and have a

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

combined 32.1% ownership interest in Euro JV Fund I and a combined 33.4% interest in Euro JV Fund II. Due to the ownership structure and substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partners, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditure budgets, the Euro JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate size of the Euro JV is approximately €1.3 billion ($1.7 billion). Our aggregate investment is approximately €140 million ($182 million), of which approximately €109 million ($141 million) is attributable to Euro JV Fund I and approximately €31 million ($41 million) is attributable to Euro JV Fund II. As general partner, we earn a management fee based on the amount of equity commitments and equity investments. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded approximately $11 million, $5 million and $6 million of management fees, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, the partners have funded approximately €487 million, or 90%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I and expect to utilize the remaining commitment amount for capital expenditures and financing needs. On June 27, 2011, we expanded the Euro JV through the creation of Euro JV Fund II, in which each of the partners holds a 33.3% limited partner interest and we hold the 0.1% general partner interest. The Euro JV Fund II has a target size of approximately €450 million of new equity and a target investment of approximately €1 billion, after taking into account anticipated debt. As part of the expansion, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to Euro JV Fund II at a price of £64 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. In addition to the expansion of the capacity of the Euro JV, we have extended its term from 2016 to 2021, subject to two one-year extensions.

On September 30, 2011, the Euro JV Fund II acquired the 396-room Pullman Bercy, Paris, for approximately €96 million, including certain acquisition costs of €6 million and a €52.6 million mortgage loan. We contributed €15 million ($20 million) to the Euro JV to finance our portion of the acquisition. The Euro JV will invest an additional €9 million in order to renovate the rooms and public space at the hotel.

The Euro JV has €786 million of mortgage debt, all of which is non-recourse to us and a default under this mortgage debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. In 2010, the Euro JV negotiated various agreements with the lenders of a significant portion of this debt in order to cure actual or potential covenant defaults, cash sweeps, or non-payment defaults that expire throughout 2012. The €341 million mortgage secured by a portfolio of six hotels located in Spain, Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom and the £32 million mortgage secured by Le Méridien Piccadilly mature in 2013. Additionally, the €53 million mortgage secured by the Amsterdam hotel matures in 2013, but has two one-year extension options, subject to small fees and certain financial covenants. Due to the difficult economic climate in Europe, we expect that lenders may require more stringent financial covenants, higher rates of interest and lower loan-to-value ratios in connection with making new loans, which would require an equity contribution or debt paydowns with the proceeds from asset sales to reduce the current loan principal balance.

We have entered into five foreign currency forward sale contracts in order to hedge the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the Euro JV. We have hedged €100 million (approximately $140 million) of our investment and the forward purchases will occur between October 2012 and August 2015. During 2011 and 2010, we recorded approximately $2 million and $5 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the forward sale contracts in other comprehensive income (loss). The current value of the forward contracts of $9 million is included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheet. The derivatives are considered a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, and, in accordance with applicable hedge accounting guidance, are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).

Asian Joint Venture

We own a 25% interest in a joint venture in Asia (the “Asian JV”) with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. The initial term of the Asian JV is for a period of seven years. Due to the ownership structure and the substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partner, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditure budgets, the Asian JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. The commitment period for the equity contributions to the joint venture expires in March of 2012.

During 2011, the Asian JV invested approximately $53 million (of which our share was $13.3 million) of its $65 million commitment to acquire a 36% interest of a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprises Limited. This joint venture is developing seven properties, totaling approximately 1,750 rooms in three major cities in India, Bengaluru, Chennai and Delhi, which properties will be managed by Accor under the Pullman, Novotel and ibis brands. The first two hotels are expected to be fully opened by March of 2012.

Other Investments

On September 1, 2011, we acquired the remaining 51% of the Tiburon Golf Ventures, L.P., which owns the golf club surrounding The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort, for $11 million. We now own a 100% general and limited partner interest in Tiburon Golf Ventures, L.P. and consolidate its operations.

Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Investees

Combined summarized balance sheet information for our affiliates follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011   2010 

Property and equipment, net

  $1,506    $1,376  

Other assets

   205     132  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,711    $1,508  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt

  $1,018    $945  

Other liabilities

   109     142  

Equity

   584     421  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $1,711    $1,508  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Combined summarized operating results for our affiliates follows (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Total revenues

  $381   $291   $360  

Operating expenses

    

Expenses

   (294  (218  (274

Depreciation and amortization

   (46  (41  (39
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit

   41    32    47  

Interest income

   —      —      3  

Interest expense

   (43  (44  (53
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(2 $(12 $(3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.Debt

Debt consists of the following (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011   2010 

Series K senior notes, with a rate of 7 1/8% due November 2013

  $—      $250  

Series O senior notes, with a rate of 6 3/8% due March 2015

   650     650  

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6 3/4% due June 2016

   800     800  

Series S senior notes, with a rate of 6 7/8% due November 2014

   498     498  

Series T senior notes, with a rate of 9% due May 2017

   390     388  

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

   500     500  

Series W senior notes, with a rate of 5 7/8% due June 2019

   496     —    

Series Y senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

   300     —    

2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 3 1/4% due April

2024

   175     325  

2007 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2 5/8% due April

2027

   385     502  

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2 1/2% due

October 2029

   342     329  

Senior notes, with rate of 10.0% due May 2012

   7     7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total senior notes

   4,543     4,249  

Credit facility

   117     58  

Mortgage debt (non-recourse) secured by $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion of

real estate assets, with an average interest rate of 5.0% and 4.7% at

December 31, 2011 and 2010, maturing through December 2023 (1)

   1,006     1,025  

Other

   87     145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt

  $5,753    $5,477  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The amount of the assets stated above securing mortgage debt represents the book value of real estate assets, net of accumulated depreciation. These amounts do not represent the current fair value of the assets.

Senior Notes

General.Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, which includes our Exchangeable Senior Debentures, our senior notes are equal in right of payment with all of our unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to all of our subordinated obligations. The face amount of our senior notes as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $4.6 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively. The senior notes balance as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 includes discounts of approximately $77 million and $109 million, respectively. We pay interest on each series of our senior notes semi-annually in arrears at the respective annual rates indicated in the table above.

Under the terms of the senior notes indenture, our ability to incur indebtedness and pay dividends is subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions. As of December 31, 2011, we are in compliance with all of these covenants.

We completed the following senior notes transactions during 2011 and 2010:

in November of 2011, we issued $300 million of 6% Series Y senior notes due October of 2021. We received proceeds from the issuance of approximately $295 million, net of underwriting fees and expenses. Interest on the Series Y senior notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, beginning April 1, 2012.

in December and August of 2011, we repurchased a total of $138 million face amount of our 2 5/8% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2007 Debentures”), with a carrying value of $134 million, and recorded a loss of approximately $5 million on the transaction. Following these repurchases, we have approximately $388 million face amount of the 2007 Debentures outstanding.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

in June of 2011, we redeemed $150 million of our 3.25% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2004 Debentures”). Approximately $134 million face amount was exchanged for 8.8 million shares of Host Inc. common stock and $16 million face amount was redeemed for cash.

on May 11 and May 25, 2011, we issued $425 million and $75 million, respectively, of 5 7/8% Series W senior notes due June 15, 2019. We received proceeds from these issuances of approximately $489 million, net of discounts, underwriting fees and expenses. Interest on the Series W senior notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15, beginning December 15, 2011. A portion of the proceeds were used to redeem the remaining $250 million of the 7 1/8% Series K senior notes due November of 2013, plus $3 million premium on the redemption. The Series W senior notes were exchanged for Series X senior notes in January of 2012. The terms are substantially identical in all respects, except that the new series are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are, therefore, freely transferable by the holders.

on October 25, 2010, we issued $500 million of 6% Series U senior notes due November 1, 2020 and received proceeds of approximately $492 million, net of underwriting fees and expenses. Interest on the Series U senior notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, beginning on February 1, 2011. The Series U senior notes were exchanged for Series V senior notes in February of 2011. The terms are substantially identical in all respects, except that the new series are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are, therefore, freely transferable by the holders.

in November and August of 2010, we redeemed a total of $475 million of the then outstanding $725 million, 7 1/8% Series K senior notes that were due in November 2013. As a result of these redemptions, we recorded a $12 million loss on debt extinguishment, which loss is included in interest expense.

on January 20, 2010, we redeemed the remaining $346 million outstanding of our 7% Series M senior notes that were due in August 2012. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded an $8 million loss on debt extinguishments, which loss is included in interest expense.

Exchangeable Debentures

As of December 31, 2011, we have three issuances of exchangeable senior debentures outstanding: $400 million of 2 1/2% debentures that were issued on December 22, 2009, $388 million of 2 5/8% debentures that were issued on March 23, 2007, and $175 million of 3 1/4% debentures that were issued on March 16, 2004, collectively, the “Debentures.” The Debentures are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes. Holders have the right to require us to purchase the Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount outstanding, plus accrued interest (the “put option”), on certain dates subsequent to their respective issuances. Holders of the Debentures also have the right to exchange the Debentures prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock is more than 120% (for the 2004 Debentures) or 130% (for the 2007 and 2009 Debentures) of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of 30 consecutive trading days during certain periods or at any time up to two days prior to the date on which the Debentures have been called for redemption. We can redeem for cash all, or a portion, of any of the Debentures at any time subsequent to each of their respective redemption dates at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. If, at any time, we elect to redeem the Debentures and the exchange value exceeds the cash redemption price, we would expect the holders to elect to exchange the Debentures at the respective exchange value rather than receive the cash redemption price. The exchange value is equal to the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Upon exchange, the 2004 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, the 2007 Debentures would be exchanged for a combination of cash (for the principal balance of the debentures) and Host Inc.’s common stock (for the remainder of the exchange value, if any) and the 2009 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, cash or a combination thereof, at our option. Based on Host Inc.’s stock price at December 31, 2011, the 2009 Debentures’ if-converted value would exceed the outstanding principal amount by $25 million. Currently, none of the Debentures are exchangeable by holders.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following chart details our outstanding Debentures:

   As of December 31, 2011 
   Maturity
date
   Next put
option
date
   Redemption
date
   Outstanding
principal
amount
   Current exchange
rate for each
$1,000 of principal
   Current
equivalent
exchange price
   Exchangeable
share
equivalents
 
               (in millions)   (in shares)       (in shares) 

2009 Debentures

   10/15/2029     10/15/2015     10/20/2015    $400     71.9264    $13.90     28.8 million  

2007 Debentures

   4/15/2027     4/15/2012     4/20/2012     388     32.0239    $31.23     12.4 million  

2004 Debentures

   4/15/2024     4/15/2014     4/19/2009     175     65.5744    $15.25     11.5 million  
        

 

 

       

Total

        $963        
        

 

 

       

We account separately for the liability and equity components of our Debentures in order to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, for the Debentures, we record the liability components thereof at fair value as of the date of issuance and amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense over the expected life of the debt; however, there is no effect of this discount on our cash interest payments. We measured the fair value of the debt components of the 2009 Debentures, the 2007 Debentures and the 2004 Debentures at issuance based on effective interest rates of 6.9%, 6.5% and 6.8%, respectively. As a result, we attributed $247 million of the aggregate proceeds received to the conversion feature of the Debentures. This amount represents the excess proceeds received over the fair value of the debt at the date of issuance and is included in Host Inc.’s additional paid-in capital and Host L.P.’s capital on the consolidated balance sheets. The following chart details the initial allocations between the debt and equity components of the Debentures, net of the original issue discounts, based on the effective interest rate at the time of issuance, as well as the debt balances (in millions):

               As of December 31, 2011 
   Initial
Face Amount
   Initial
Debt Value
   Initial
Equity Value
   Face Amount
Outstanding
   Debt Carrying
Value
   Unamortized
Discount
 

2009 Debentures

  $400    $316    $82    $400    $342    $58  

2007 Debentures

   600     502     89     388     385     3  

2004 Debentures

   500     413     76     175     175     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,500    $1,231    $247    $963    $902    $61  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense recorded for the Debentures consists of the following (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 

Contractual interest expense (cash)

  $31    $34    $26  

Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization

   31     32     27  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  $62    $66    $53  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Losses on the repurchased debentures are recorded in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. We evaluated the fair value of the repurchased debenture based on the fair value of the cash flows at the date of the repurchase, discounted at risk adjusted rates. Based on this calculation, the fair value of our repurchased debentures generally has been greater than the conversion price; therefore, substantially all of the repurchase price was allocated to the debt portion of the debentures.

Authorization for Senior Notes and Exchangeable Senior Debentures Repurchase

In February 2012, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of up to $500 million of senior notes, exchangeable debentures and mortgage debt (other than in accordance with its terms) and terminated the previous authorization. Any further redemption of the 2004 Debentures will not reduce the $500 million of Board authority noted above to repurchase other debt securities.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Credit Facility

On November 22, 2011, we entered into a new senior revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and The Bank of Nova Scotia as co-documentation agents, and certain other agents and lenders. The new credit facility replaces the prior senior revolving credit facility which would have expired in September of 2012. The new credit facility allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, including a foreign currency subfacility for Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, New Zealand dollars, Japanese Yen, Euros and British Pounds Sterling of up to the foreign currency equivalent of $500 million, subject to a lower amount in the case of New Zealand dollar borrowings. The credit facility also provides a subfacility of up to $100 million for swingline borrowings and a subfacility of up to $100 million for issuances of letters of credit. Host L.P. also has the option to increase the aggregate principal amount of the credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions. The credit facility has an initial scheduled maturity date of November 2015, with an option for Host L.P. to extend the term for one additional year, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee.

Under the previous senior revolving credit facility, we had the following transactions during 2011 and 2010:

On June 28, 2011, we used the proceeds received from the transfer of the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II to repay £25 million ($40 million) under the credit facility.

On April 26, 2011, to facilitate the acquisition of the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, we drew $50 million on our credit facility, which draw subsequently was repaid on May 12, 2011.

On March 1, 2011, we repaid the C$129 million ($132 million) mortgage debt on our portfolio of four hotels in Canada. We drew C$100 million ($103 million) from our credit facility in the form of bankers’ acceptances in order to fund a portion of this repayment. The bankers’ acceptances had an initial average interest rate of 2.18%, based on the 30-day Canadian bankers’ acceptances rate, plus 90 basis points.

On July 20, 2010, we drew £37 million ($56 million) from our credit facility in order to fund the cash portion of the acquisition of Le Méridien Piccadilly in London.

The amounts outstanding at the time we entered into the new credit facility were transferred over to the new credit facility and remain outstanding. Based on our draws at December 31, 2011, we have $883 million of remaining available capacity under our credit facility.

Collateral and Guarantees.The credit facility initially does not include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests in our subsidiaries, and the guarantees and pledges are required only in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges ratably would benefit the credit facility, as well as the notes outstanding under Host L.P.’s senior notes indenture, interest rate and currency hedges and certain other hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. Even when triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would provide neither guarantees nor pledges of equity interests. As of December 31, 2011, our leverage ratio was 4.8x.

Financial Covenants. The credit facility contains covenants concerning allowable leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage. Currently, we are permitted to borrow and maintain amounts outstanding under the credit facility so long as our leverage ratio is not in excess of 7.25x, our unsecured coverage ratio is not less than 1.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.25x. The financial covenants for the credit facility do not apply when there are no borrowings under the credit facility. Therefore, so long as there are no amounts outstanding, we would not be in default if we do not satisfy the financial covenants and we do not lose the potential to draw under the credit facility in the future if we were to regain compliance with the financial covenants. These calculations are performed based on pro forma results for the prior four fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of the credit facility, interest expense excludes items such as gains and losses on the extinguishment

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisition of a loan in order to establish the debt at fair value and non-cash interest expense due to the implementation in 2009 of accounting standards related to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept, under which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance. As of December 31, 2011, we are in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit facility.

Interest and Fees.We pay interest on revolver borrowings under the credit facility at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin (i) ranging from 175 to 275 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio), or (ii) following the date on which Host L.P.’s long-term unsecured debt rating is investment grade and Host L.P. elects ratings-based pricing, ranging from 100 to 160 basis points (depending on Host LP’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on our leverage ratio at December 31, 2011 of 4.8x, we would be able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. While we are using leverage-based pricing, to the extent that amounts under the credit facility remain unused, we pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the loan commitment of 25 to 35 basis points, depending on our average revolver usage during the applicable period. Upon attainment of an investment grade unsecured debt rating and election of ratings-based pricing, in lieu of paying an unused commitment fee, we would instead pay a facility fee ranging from 15 basis points to 40 basis points, depending on our rating and regardless of usage.

Other Covenants and Events of Default. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants on customary matters. Certain covenants become less restrictive at any time that our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x. In particular, at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, we will not be subject to limitations on capital expenditures, and the limitations on acquisitions, investments and dividends contained in the credit facility will be superseded by the generally less restrictive corresponding covenants in our senior notes indenture. Additionally, the credit facility’s restrictions on the incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends generally are consistent with our senior notes indenture. These provisions, under certain circumstances, limit debt incurrence to debt incurred under the credit facility or in connection with a refinancing, and limit dividend payments to those necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s tax status as a REIT. The credit facility also includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature, and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, payment of all amounts owed under the credit facility may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts owed under the credit facility will become due and payable and the lenders’ commitments will terminate.

Mortgage Debt

All of our mortgage debt is recourse solely to specific assets, except for environmental liabilities, fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions. As of December 31, 2011, we have 14 assets that are secured by mortgage debt, with an average interest rate of 5.0%, that mature between 2013 and 2023. As of December 31, 2011, we are in compliance with the covenants under all of our mortgage debt obligations.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We had the following mortgage debt issuances and repayments since January 2010. Interest for our mortgage debt is payable on a monthly basis:

Transaction Date

  

Property

  Rate  Maturity
Date
   Amount 
             (in millions) 

Issuances/Assumptions

       

November 2011

  

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1)

   6.77  11/23/2016    $79  

February 2011

  

New Zealand Hotel Portfolio (2)

   5.49  2/18/2016     80  

Repayments/Defeasance/Transfer

       

June 2011

  

Le Méridien Piccadilly (3)

   1.99  1/20/2012     (52

March 2011

  

Four Canadian properties

   5.2  3/1/2011     (132

December 2010

  

Partial repayment of Orlando World Center mortgage (4)

   3.76  12/30/2010     (54

December 2010

  

JW Marriott, Desert Springs

   9.8  12/11/2022     (71

October 2010

  

W New York, Union Square (5)

   6.39  10/11/2011     (119

February 2010

  

Atlanta Marriott Marquis

   7.4  2/11/2023     (124

(1)The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month BBSY plus 230 basis points. In addition, we entered into separate swap agreements that fix 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 6.7% and cap the remaining 25% at an all-in interest rate of 9.9%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2011. In connection with the acquisition of the property in April 2011, we assumed an $86 million mortgage loan. The issuance represents the refinancing of this mortgage loan.
(2)The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month New Zealand Bank Bill Rate plus 120 basis points plus an additional commitment fee of 120 basis points per annum. In addition, we entered into a swap agreement that fixes 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 7.15%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2011.
(3)This floating rate mortgage is based on LIBOR plus 118 basis points. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at the time of transfer. In connection with the transfer of Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II, we transferred the associated mortgage. The mortgage loan had been assumed at acquisition of the property in June 2010.
(4)On December 17, 2010, we entered into an amendment under the $300 million mortgage loan secured by the Orlando World Center Marriott. As a result of the amendment, we repaid $54 million of the outstanding principal on December 30, 2010 and extended the maturity of the loan to July 1, 2013. We have a fixed annual interest rate of 4.75% on the remaining $246 million outstanding.
(5)The amount shown reflects our recorded book value of the mortgage debt on the date defeasance. We defeased this loan on October 19, 2010, which released us from obligations under the mortgage. In connection with the acquisition of the property in September 2010, we assumed the $115 million mortgage loan.

Interest Rate Derivative Instruments

We have entered into several derivative instruments in order to manage our exposures to risks associated with changes in interest rates. None of our derivative instruments has been entered into for trading purposes.

Aggregate Debt Maturities

Aggregate debt maturities are as follows (in millions):

   As of
December 31,

2011
 

2012

  $400  

2013

   359  

2014

   1,142  

2015

   1,179  

2016

   965  

Thereafter

   1,769  
  

 

 

 
   5,814  

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

   (75

Fair value hedge adjustment

   12  

Capital lease obligations

   2  
  

 

 

 
  $5,753  
  

 

 

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interest

The following items are included in interest expense (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011(1)  2010(1)  2009(2) 

Interest expense

  $371   $384   $379  

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net (3)

   (32  (34  (31

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   (11  (12  (12

Non-cash gains/(losses) on debt extinguishments

   (4  (1  2  

Change in accrued interest

   (4  10    (11
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest paid (4)

  $320   $347   $327  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Interest expense and interest paid for 2011 and 2010 includes cash prepayment premiums of approximately $5 million and $20 million, respectively. No significant prepayment premium was paid in 2009.
(2)Interest expense and interest paid for 2009 is net of $7 million received in connection with the 2007 defeasance of $514 million in collateralized mortgage-backed securities.
(3)Primarily represents the amortization of the debt discount on our Debentures, which is non-cash interest expense.
(4)Does not include capitalized interest of $4 million, $3 million and $5 million during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Amortization of property and equipment under capital leases totaled $3 million, $1 million and $1 million for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

5.Equity of Host Inc. and Capital of Host L.P.

Equity of Host Inc.

Host Inc. has authorized 1,050 million shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, of which 705.1 million and 675.6 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Fifty million shares of no par value preferred stock are authorized; none of such preferred shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Capital of Host L.P.

As of December 31, 2011, Host Inc. is the owner of approximately 98.5% of Host L.P.’s OP units. The remaining 1.5% of the OP units are held by various third party limited partners. Each OP unit may be redeemed for cash or, at the election of Host Inc., Host Inc. common stock, based on the conversion ratio of 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock for each OP unit.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, Host L.P. has 700.7 million and 671.8 million OP units outstanding, respectively, of which Host Inc. held 690.3 million and 661.4 million, respectively.

In exchange for any shares issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue OP units based on the applicable conversion ratio. Following a 2009 Host Inc. stock dividend distribution, in which OP unitholders did not receive an equivalent per unit distribution for the dividend paid with Host Inc. common stock, the conversion factor used to convert OP units into shares of Host Inc. common stock was adjusted from 1.0 to 1.021494. Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends on its common stock are provided through distributions from Host L.P.

Issuances of Common Stock

During 2011, Host Inc. issued 19.1 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $17.09 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $323 million. These issuances were made in “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to Sales Agency Financing Agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC. There is approximately $174 million of issuance capacity remaining under the current agreement.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In 2010, Host Inc. issued 26.9 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $15.25 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $406 million under the same “at-the-market” programs.

During June 2011, $134 million of the 2004 Debentures were exchanged for shares of Host Inc. common stock, totaling approximately 8.8 million shares.

Dividends/Distributions

Host Inc. is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash. Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends on its common stock are provided through distributions from Host L.P. The amount of any future dividends will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

All common and preferred cash and stock dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2011 and 2010 were considered 100% ordinary income. None of such dividends was considered qualified dividends subject to a reduced tax rate. The table below presents the amount of common and preferred dividends declared per share and common and preferred distributions per unit as follows:

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 

Common stock

  $.14    $.04    $.25  

Class E preferred stock 8 7/8%

   —       .555     2.22  

Common OP units

   .143     .041     .025  

Class E preferred OP units 8 7/8%

   —       .555     2.22  

Preferred Stock Redemption

On June 18, 2010, Host Inc. redeemed 4,034,300 shares of its 8 7/8% Class E cumulative redeemable preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued dividends. The original issuance costs for the Class E preferred stock are treated as a deemed dividend in Host Inc.’s consolidated statement of operations and have been reflected as a deduction to net income (loss) available to common stockholders for the purpose of calculating Host Inc.’s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Similarly, the issuance costs have been treated as a deemed distribution in Host L.P.’s consolidated statement of operations and have been reflected as a reduction to Host L.P.’s earnings per diluted unit.

6.Income Taxes

Host Inc. elected to be taxed as a REIT effective January 1, 1999, pursuant to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In general,It is our current intention to adhere to the REIT qualification requirements and to maintain our qualification for taxation as a REIT. A corporation that elects REIT status and meets certain tax law requirements regarding the distribution of its taxable income to its stockholders as prescribed by applicable tax laws and complies with certain other requirements (relating primarily to the composition of its assets and the sources of its revenues) generally is not subject to federal and state income taxation on its operating income that is distributed to its stockholders. As a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Host L.P. is not subject to federal income tax. ItHost L.P. is, however, subject to state, local and foreign income and franchise tax in certain jurisdictions. In addition to paying federal and state income taxestax on any retained income, one of our subsidiary REITs is subject to taxesa tax on “built-in-gains” that result from“built-in gains” on sales of certain assets. Additionally, each of ourthe Host L.P. taxable REIT subsidiaries is taxable as a regular C corporation, subject to federal, state and foreign income tax. Our consolidated income tax provision or benefit includes the income tax provision or benefit related to the operations of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, and state, local, and foreign income and franchise taxes incurred by Host L.P.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. Under the partnership agreement, Host L.P. generally is required to reimburse Host Inc. for any tax payments it is required to make. Accordingly, the tax information included herein represents disclosures regarding Host Inc. and Host L.P.,its subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and foreign income taxes incurred by Host L.P., as well as each of their respective subsidiaries.

Where required, deferred income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxesliabilities are recognized for temporarythe estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial reporting basesstatement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss, capital loss, and tax credit carryovers based oncarryovers. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which such amounts are expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted. However, deferred tax assets are recognized

103


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Total deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Deferred tax assets

  $172   $161  

Less: Valuation allowance

   (47  (44
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   125    117  

Deferred tax liabilities

   (24  (40
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $101   $77  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

We have recorded a 100% valuation allowance of approximately $37.4 million against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and asset tax credit carryovers as of December 31, 2011 with respect to our hotel in Mexico. There is a $2.2 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and capital loss carryovers as of December 31, 2011 with respect to our hotels in Canada. Finally, there is a $7.4 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss carryovers as of December 31, 2011 with respect to certain of our U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries that act as lessee pursuant to the HPT leases. We expect that the remaining net operating loss and alternative minimum tax credit carryovers for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be realized. The net increase in the valuation allowance for the year ending December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is approximately $3 million and $7 million, respectively. The primary components of our net deferred tax asset are as follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Accrued related party interest

  $16   $12  

Net operating loss and capital loss carryovers

   99    74  

Alternative minimum tax credits

   4    4  

Property and equipment

   (18  (18

Investments in domestic and foreign affiliates

   (3  (2

Derivatives

   1    —    

Deferred revenue and other

   49    51  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   148    121  

Less: Valuation allowance

   (47  (44
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $101   $77  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2011, we have aggregate gross domestic and foreign net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $276 million. We have deferred tax assets related to these loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $99 million, with a valuation allowance of approximately $47 million. Our net operating loss carryovers expire through 2031, and our foreign capital loss carryovers have no expiration period. Our domestic alternative minimum tax credits have no expiration period and our foreign asset tax credits expire through 2017.

Our U.S. and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was as follows (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

U.S. loss

  $(41 $(170 $(208

Foreign income (loss)

   28    11    (28
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $(13 $(159 $(236
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The benefit for income taxes for continuing operations consists of (in millions):

     Year ended December 31, 
     2011  2010  2009 

Current

 

—   Federal

  $1   $—     $(7
 —   State   1    1    2  
 —   Foreign   8    4    4  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    10    5    (1
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred

 

—   Federal

   (11  (31  (33
 —   State   (2  (6  (7
 —   Foreign   2    1    2  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    (11  (36  (38
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax benefit – continuing operations

  $(1 $(31 $(39
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The total benefit for income taxes, including the amounts associated with discontinued operations, was $2 million, $32 million and $40 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The differences between the income tax benefit calculated at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax benefit recorded for continuing operations are as follows (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Statutory federal income tax benefit – continuing operations

  $(5 $(56 $(83

Adjustment for nontaxable (income) loss of Host Inc. – continuing operations

   (5  25    43  

State income tax provision, net

   (1  (5  (3

Uncertain tax positions benefit

   —      —      (7

Foreign income tax provision

   10    5    11  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax benefit – continuing operations

  $(1 $(31 $(39
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, was $8 million, $4 million and $5 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

GAAP prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. We must determine whether it is “more-likely-than-not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Once it is determined that a position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement in order to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. This accounting standard applies to all tax positions related to income taxes.  A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):

   2011   2010 

Balance at January 1

  $5    $5  

Reductions due to expiration of certain statutes of limitation

   —       —    

Other increases (decreases)

   —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $5    $5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

All of such amount, if recognized, would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision (benefit) calculated at the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax provision (benefit) recorded each year.

It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease within 12 months of the reporting date due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation. An estimate of such decrease is approximately $4 million. As of December 31, 2011, the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2008-2011.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized approximately $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively of interest expense

Deferred Charges

Financing costs related to long-term debt are deferred and amortized over the unrecognized tax benefits. We had approximately $0.4 million and $0.6 million of interest accrued at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

7.Leases

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries Leases

We lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a REIT’s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel.

Hospitality Properties Trust

We own a leasehold interest in 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties, which properties were sold to Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) and leased back to us in 1995 and 1996. In connection with our conversion to a REIT, we entered into subleases with Barceló Crestline Corporation (“Barceló”) for these 53 properties, as well as 18 Residence Inn by Marriott properties. In June 2010, HPT sent notices of default because the subtenants failed to meet certain net worth covenants, which failure would have triggered an event of default by us under the leases between us and HPT. As a result, we terminated the subleases effective July 6, 2010 and resumed acting as owner under the management agreements. Effective upon terminationremaining life of the subleases, we recordeddebt using the operations of the hotels as opposed to rental income for 2010 and 2011. On December 30, 2011, we entered into a settlement with Barceló, who had guaranteed rent payments to HPT as part of the sublease, related to the termination of the subleases, which resulted in an additional $7 million of income being recorded in 2011 to compensate us for a portion of our operating losses subsequent to the sublease termination.effective interest method.

We terminated the master lease with HPT on the 18 Residence Inn properties effective December 31, 2010 and received $17.2 million of deferred proceeds related to the initial sale and additional amounts held in the tenant collection account. On November 23, 2010, we gave notice that we will not extend the lease on the 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties, which will result in termination of the lease effective December 31, 2012. At the expiration of the lease, HPT is obligated to pay us deferred proceeds related to the initial sale of approximately $51 million, plus additional amounts held in a tenant collection account.

The chart below details the other revenue and other property-level expenses related to the HPT properties (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010 

Hotel sales revenue

  $214    $123  

Rental revenue

   7     44  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total HPT revenue

  $221    $167  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property-level expenses

  $159    $96  

Rental expense

   68     84  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total HPT expenses

  $227    $180  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ground LeasesForeign Currency Translation

As of December 31, 2011, all or a portion2014, our international operations consist of 38hotels located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and New Zealand, as well as investments in the Euro JV and the Asia/Pacific JV. The financial statements of these hotels and our investments therein are maintained in their functional currency, which generally is the local currency, and their operations are translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates for the period. The assets and liabilities of the hotels and the investments therein are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in other comprehensive income (loss).

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the functional currency for each entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured at period end exchange rates. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, except when recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as qualifying net investment hedges.

Derivative Instruments

We are subject to ground leases, generally with multiple renewal options, allmarket exposures in several aspects of our business and may enter into derivative instruments in order to hedge the effect of these market exposures on our operations. Potential market exposures for which we may use derivative instruments to hedge include: (i) changes in the fair value of our international investments due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, (ii) changes in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt due to changes in the underlying interest rates, and (iii) variability in interest payments due to changes in the underlying interest rate for our floating-rate debt. Derivative instruments are accountedsubject to fair value reporting at each reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We estimate the fair value of these instruments through the use of third party valuations, which utilize the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future cash receipts and the discounted future expected cash payments. Prior to entering into the derivative instrument, we evaluate whether the transaction will qualify for as operating leases. For lease agreements with scheduled rent increases, we recognizehedge accounting and continue to evaluate hedge effectiveness throughout the lease expense ratably over the termlife of the lease. Certaininstrument. Derivative instruments that meet the requirements for hedge accounting are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to net income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to reflect, as applicable, our own nonperformance risk or the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of these leases contain provisionsour derivative instruments for the paymenteffect of contingent rentals based on a percentagenonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of sales in excess of stipulated amounts. Additionally, the rental payments under one leasenetting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and accumulated guarantees. The variable cash flow streams are based on real estate tax assessments.an expectation of future interest and exchange rates derived from observed market interest and exchange rate curves. The values of these instruments will change over time as cash receipts and payments are made and as market conditions change.

104


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Accumulated Other Lease Information

We also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business, all of which we subsequently subleased. These leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options, generally for five or ten-year periods. The restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases. Our leasing activities also include leases entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment, such as computer equipment, vehicles and telephone systems. Equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases, depending on the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement. Equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease. The amortization charge applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the future minimum annual rental commitments required under non-cancelable leases for which we are the lessee (in millions):

   As of December 31, 2011 
   Capital
Leases
   Operating
Leases
 

2012

  $1    $113  

2013

   1     45  

2014

   —       43  

2015

   —       41  

2016

   —       39  

Thereafter

   —       1,379  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  $2    $1,660  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Minimum payments for the operating leases have not been reduced by aggregate minimum sublease rentals from restaurantscomponents of approximately $4 million that are payable to us under non-cancelable subleases.

We remain contingently liable on certain leases relating to our former restaurant business. Such contingent liabilities aggregated $14 million as of December 31, 2011. However, management considers the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote.

Rent expense is includedtotal accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the other property-level expenses line item and consists of (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Minimum rentals on operating leases

  $114   $128   $122  

Additional rentals based on sales

   26    19    23  

Rental payments based on real estate tax assessments

   22    21    19  

Less: sublease rentals

   (3  (44  (83
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $159   $124   $81  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

8.Employee Stock Plans

In connection with Host Inc.’s conversion to a REIT, Host L.P. assumed the employee obligations of Host Inc. Upon the issuance of Host Inc.’s common stock under either of the two stock-based compensation plans described below, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. Accordingly, these liabilities and related disclosuresbalance sheets are included in both Host Inc.’s and Host L.P.’s consolidated financial statements.

Host Inc. maintains two stock-based compensation plans, the Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2009 Comprehensive Plan”), under which Host Inc. may award to participating employees (i) restricted shares of Host Inc.’s common stock, (ii) options to purchase our common stock, and (iii) deferred shares of our common stock, and the employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”). At December 31, 2011, there were approximately 19 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2009 Comprehensive Plan.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We recognize costs resulting from share-based payment transactions in our financial statements over their vesting periods. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services as either equity awards or as liability awards. The classification of restricted stock awards either as an equity award or a liability award is based upon cash settlement options. Equity awards are measured based on their fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are re-measured to fair value each reporting period. The value of all restricted stock awards, less estimated forfeitures, is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award—the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services. The senior executive restricted stock awards have been classified as liability awards, primarily due to settlement features that allow the recipient to have a percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet tax requirements in excess of the statutory minimum withholding requirements. Other stock awards have been classified as equity awards, as these awards do not contain this optional tax withholding feature.

On May 14, 2009, our stockholders approved the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. The 2009 Comprehensive Plan currently has 25.5 million shares authorized, which includes incremental shares approved on May 7, 2010 to reflect our 2009 stock dividend, that can be issued for stock-based compensation to employees and directors. Shares described below that were granted after May 14, 2009 were issued under this plan. We granted 5.1 million restricted shares to senior executives that vest in 2010 and 2011 and 1.0 million stock options under this plan. We also granted 0.2 million restricted shares to other employees at a per share price of $10.40.

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded compensation expense of approximately $19 million, $40 million and $21 million, respectively. Shares granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009 totaled 0.2 million, 0.4 million and 9.0 million, respectively, while 1.5 million, 2.6 million and 2.2 million, respectively, vested during those years.

Senior Executive Restricted Stock

During 2009, Host Inc. granted shares to senior executives that vested through year end 2011 in three annual installments (the “2009 – 2011 Plan”). No awards were outstanding as of December 31, 2011. Vesting for these shares was determined based on (1) personal performance based on the achievement of specific management business objectives, and (2) market performance based on the achievement of total shareholder return on a relative basis. These awards were considered liability awards; therefore, we recognized compensation expense over the requisite period based on the fair value of the award at the balance sheet date. The fair value was based on the number of shares earned during the year at the December 31, 2011 stock price.

Under the 2009-2011 Plan, we granted a total of 7.6 million shares (0.1 million in 2011, 0.3 million in 2010 and 7.2 million in 2009). The grants in 2010 and 2011 primarily related to new hires or promotions. Of the 7.6 million shares granted, vesting for approximately 48% of the shares was based on the satisfaction of personal performance goals set by each executive, approximately 26% was based on the achievement of total shareholder return on a relative basis compared to the NAREIT index and approximately 26% was based on the achievement of total shareholder return in comparison to eight other lodging companies.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded compensation expense of approximately $15 million, $36 million and $19 million, respectively, related to the restricted stock awards to senior executives. The following table is a summary of the status of our senior executive plans for the three years ended December 31, 2011. The fair values for the awards below are based on the fair value at the respective transaction dates, as the awards are classified as liability awards.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011   2010   2009 
   Shares
(in millions)
  Fair Value
(per share)
   Shares
(in millions)
  Fair Value
(per share)
   Shares
(in millions)
  Fair Value
(per share)
 

Balance, at beginning of year

   3.7   $11     5.6   $7     0.1   $7  

Granted

   0.1    17     0.3    17     7.2    9  

Vested (1)

   (1.3  15     (1.9  18     (1.6  11  

Forfeited/expired

   (2.5  15     (0.3  11     (0.1  7  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

Balance, at end of year

   —      —       3.7    11     5.6    7  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

Issued in calendar year (1)

   1.1    15     0.8    11     0.1    7  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

(1)Shares that vest at December 31 of each year are issued to the employees in the first quarter of the following year, although the requisite service period is complete. Accordingly, the 1.1 million shares issued in 2011 include shares vested at December 31, 2010, after adjusting for shares withheld to meet employee tax requirements. The shares withheld for employee tax requirements were valued at $15.4 million, $6.9 million and $0.6 million, for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Employee Stock Options

As of December 31, 2011, 1.3 million stock options were outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average remaining life of 7 years and a weighted average exercise price of $7.68. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, stock option grants totaled 22,000, 54,000 and 1.4 million, respectively. Stock compensation expense was $1.8 million during 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $0.8 million during 2009 and all stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2011 are fully vested. We expense stock options over the vesting period based on the estimated fair value of the options grant date using the simulation/Monte Carlo method. To calculate the fair value of options granted from 2009 to 2011, we assumed (i) a weighted average volatility of 56.1%, (ii) a weighted average risk free rate of 2.3%, and (iii) a weighted average dividend yield of 4.9%.

Other Stock Plans

In addition to the stock plans described above, we maintain an upper-middle management plan, an employee stock purchase plan and, in 2009, granted stock awards to all employees. These awards are all time-based equity awards that vest within three years of the grant date and expense is based on the grant date fair value. During 2011, 2010 and 2009 we granted 93,000 shares, 120,000 shares and 331,000 shares, respectively, under these programs and recorded expenses of $1.9 million, $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

9.Profit Sharing and Postemployment Benefit Plans

We contribute to defined contribution plans for the benefit of employees who meet certain eligibility requirements and who elect participation in the plans. The discretionary amount to be matched by us is determined annually by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors. Our recorded liability for this obligation is not material. Payments for these items were not material for the three years ended December 31, 2011.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.Discontinued Operations

We disposed of one hotel in 2011, two hotels in 2010 and six hotels in 2009. The operations for these hotels are included in discontinued operations. The following table summarizes the revenues, loss before taxes, and the gain (loss) on dispositions, net of tax, of the hotels which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, which includes assets held for sale and the results of sold hotels prior to their disposition for the periods presented (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Revenues

  $5   $14   $81  

Loss before taxes

   (4  (3  (88

Gain (loss) on disposals, net of tax

   —      (2  26  

Net loss attributable to Host Inc. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Loss from continuing operations, net of tax

  $(11 $(126 $(192

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   (4  (4  (60
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  $(15 $(130 $(252
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Gain on foreign currency forward contracts

 

$

19

 

 

$

 

Loss on interest rate swap cash flow hedges

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(67

)

 

 

(7

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

(50

)

 

$

(9

)

Net loss attributableThere were no material amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to Host L.P. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Loss from continuing operations, net of tax

  $(11 $(128 $(196

Discontinued operations, net of tax

   (4  (4  (61
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  $(15 $(132 $(257
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

11.Acquisitions

We record the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interests at the estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. Furthermore, acquisition-related costs, such as broker fees, transfer taxes, due diligence costs and legal and accounting fees, are expensed in the period incurred and are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair value of the acquired assets. We acquired 10 hotels during 2011 and recorded $5 million of acquisition-related expenses and acquired four hotels during 2010 and recorded $8 million of acquisition-related expenses. For 2011 and 2010, our acquisitions were as follows:

On September 1, 2011, we acquired the remaining 51% partnership interest in the Tiburon Golf Ventures, L.P., which owns the golf club surrounding The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort, for $11 million.

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% common voting interest and a preferred interest in the joint venture that owns the 364-room Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, Australia. The total transaction value, including the 25% voting interest retained by the previous owners, was A$142 million ($152 million) and included the assumption of an existing A$80 million ($86 million) mortgage loan. We are entitled to receive a cumulative priority return of 12% based on our initial investment of A$45 million ($48 million), plus 75% of the distributable cash after our partner’s subordinated preferred interest.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On March 23, 2011, we acquired the 775-room New York Helmsley Hotel for $313.5 million. The hotel is managed by Starwood and will be converted to the Westin brand in 2012.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the 1,625-room Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego for $572 million (which includes the payment of $19 millionnet income for the existing FF&E replacement fund). The transaction was comprisedyear ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. During 2012, we reclassified a net gain of cash consideration of $566$2 million includingthat had been recognized previously in gain on foreign currency forward sale contracts in other comprehensive income related to two foreign currency denominated subsidiaries that were substantially liquidated during the repayment of $403 million of existing loans,year and the issuance of approximately 0.3 million OP units valued at $6 million. We also issued approximately 4 million Class F preferred units with a per unit liquidation preference of $25, for an aggregate amount of $99.5 million. We received a note from the seller equalrecognized such gain in value to the preferred units issued. The interest rategain (loss) on the note receivable is 25 basis points less than the dividend rate on the preferred units. In accordance with ASC 505, a right of setoff exists between the note receivableforeign currency transactions and the preferred units, as the proceeds from the redemption of the preferred units must be used to repay the note receivable. Therefore, these two instruments are recorded netderivatives on our consolidated balance sheet.

On February 18, 2011, we acquired a portfoliostatement of hotels in New Zealand for approximately NZ$190 million ($145 million), at which time we entered into an NZ$105 million ($80 million) mortgage. The properties are operated by Accor under the ibis and Novotel brands. The portfolio is comprised of the following hotels:

The 273-room Hotel Novotel Queenstown Lakeside;

The 193-room Hotel Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square;

The 147-room Hotel Novotel Auckland Ellerslie;

The 139-room Hotel Novotel Wellington;

The 200-room Hotel ibis Wellington;

The 155-room Hotel ibis Christchurch; and

The 100-room Hotel ibis Ellerslie.

On September 30, 2010, we acquired the 245-room JW Marriott, Rio de Janeiro for approximately R$80 million ($47 million).

On September 2, 2010, we formed a joint venture to purchase the 270-room W New York, Union Square. We have a 90% interest and serve as the managing member of the joint venture. The joint venture purchased the hotel for $188 million, which, in addition to cash consideration, included the assumption of $115 million of mortgage debt, with a fair value of $119 million, and other liabilities valued at $8.5 million. Additionally, in conjunction with the acquisition, the joint venture purchased restricted cash and FF&E reserve funds at the hotel of $11 million.

On August 11, 2010, we acquired the 424-room Westin Chicago River North for approximately $165 million.

On July 22, 2010, we acquired the leasehold interest in the 266-room Le Méridien Piccadilly in London, England for £64 million ($98 million), including cash consideration of approximately £31 million ($47 million) and the assumption of a £33 million ($51 million) mortgage, which approximates fair value. As part of the purchase of the leasehold interest, we acquired restricted cash at the hotel of £4 million ($6 million). In connection with the acquisition, we assumed a capital lease obligation which we valued at £38 million ($58 million). We also recorded a deferred tax liability of £19 million ($30 million) and a deferred tax asset of £11 million ($17 million) and goodwill of £8 million ($13 million) related to the difference in the hotel valuation measured at fair value on the acquisition date and the tax basis of the assets acquired. We drew £37 million ($56 million) from our credit facility to fund the cash portion of the acquisition. On June 28, 2011, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II (see Note 3 “Investments in Affiliates”).

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIESoperations.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Revenues

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2011 and 2010 acquisitions (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Property and equipment

  $1,174   $557  

Goodwill

   —      13  

Intangible asset

   7    —    

Deferred tax asset

   10    17  

Restricted cash, FF&E reserve and other assets

   20    24  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,211   $611  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Mortgage debt

  $(86 $(168

Capital lease obligation

   —      (58

Deferred tax liability

   (13  (30

Other liabilities

   (6  (13
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $1,106   $342  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our summarized unaudited consolidated pro forma results of operations assuminginclude revenues and expenses of our hotels. Revenues are recognized when the 2011services are provided. Additionally, we collect sales, use, occupancy and 2010 acquisitions occurredsimilar taxes at our hotels, which we present on January 1, 2010 and excluding the acquisition costs discussed above, are as follows (in millions, except per share and per unit amounts):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2011  2010 

Revenues

  $5,062   $4,789  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   6    (118

Net income (loss) 332

   2    (122

Host Inc.:

   

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

  $3   $(128

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

   

Continuing operations

  $.01   $(.19

Discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $—     $(.20
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

   

Continuing operations

  $.01   $(.19

Discontinued operations

   (.01  (.01
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $—     $(.20
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

   

Net income (loss) available to common unitholders

  $3   $(130

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

   

Continuing operations

  $.01   $(.20

Discontinued operations

   (.01  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

  $—     $(.20
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

   

Continuing operations

  $.01   $(.20

Discontinued operations

   (.01  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

  $—     $(.20
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For 2011 and 2010, we have included $355 million and $57 million of revenues, respectively, and $35 million and $3 million ofa net income, respectively, inbasis (excluded from revenues) on our consolidated statements of operations related to the operations of the hotels and golf club acquired in 2011 and 2010.operations.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.Notes Receivable

On April 13, 2010, we acquired, at a discount, the two most junior tranches of a €427 million ($581 million) mortgage loan that is secured by six hotels located in Europe with a face value of €64 million ($87 million). Interest payments for the tranches are based on the 90-day EURIBOR rate plus 303 basis points, or approximately 4.6%. The borrower is current on amounts due under the notes. We record interest income on the loan based on the implicit interest rate required to accrete the book value of the receivable to an amount equal to the expected cash receipts for both the principal and interest through maturity. For 2011 and 2010, we recorded interest income of €13 million ($17 million) and €3 million ($4 million), respectively. The loan matures on October 18, 2012.

13.Fair Value Measurements

Overview

We have adopted the provisions under GAAP for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. Our recurring fair value measurements consist of the valuation of our derivative instruments, the majority of which are designated as accounting hedges. Non-recurring fair value measurements during 2011 consisted of the impairment of two of our hotel properties, one of which was sold in 2011.Fair Value Measurement

In evaluating the fair value of both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, GAAP outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market assumptions based on market data (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s own assumptions about market data (“unobservable inputs”). The requirements are intended to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability at the measurement date in an orderly transaction (an “exit price”). Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability when observable inputs are not available.

Host Inc. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

105


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is shown below (in millions, except per share amounts):  

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net income

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

Assuming conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

759

 

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

755.4

 

 

 

744.4

 

 

 

718.2

 

Assuming weighted average shares for conversion of

     exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

30.3

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

 

Assuming distribution of common shares granted under the

     comprehensive stock plans, less shares assumed

     purchased at market

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.4

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)

 

 

786.8

 

 

 

747.9

 

 

 

719.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.08

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

.96

 

 

$

.42

 

 

$

.08

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

There were approximately 30 million and 40 million potentially dilutive shares as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to our exchangeable senior debentures, which shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period.

Host L.P. Earnings Per Common Unit

Basic earnings per common unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to common unitholders by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Diluted earnings per common unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to common unitholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common units outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include units distributed to Host Inc. to support Host Inc. common shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

106


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit is shown below (in millions, except per unit amounts):  

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net income

 

$

747

 

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

Assuming conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

27

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Diluted income attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

768

 

 

$

322

 

 

$

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average units outstanding

 

 

748.9

 

 

 

738.4

 

 

 

713.3

 

Assuming weighted average units for conversion of

     exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

29.7

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

 

Assuming distribution of common units granted under the

     comprehensive stock plans, less units assumed

     purchased at market

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.3

 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding (1)

 

 

779.6

 

 

 

741.9

 

 

 

714.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

There were approximately 29 million and 40 million potentially dilutive units as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to our exchangeable senior debentures, which units were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period.

Share-Based Payments

At December 31, 2014, Host Inc. maintained two stock-based employee compensation plans. Upon the issuance of Host’s common stock under the compensation plans, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. These liabilities are included in the consolidated financial statements for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

We recognize costs resulting from Host Inc.’s share-based payment transactions over their vesting periods. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services either as equity awards or liability awards based upon cash settlement options. Equity classified awards are measured based on the fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. Awards are classified as liability awards to the extent that settlement features allow the recipient to determine percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet the recipients’ tax withholding requirements. As these awards vest over a one-year period ending December 31, the value is calculated as the estimated number of shares earned during the year times the stock price at year end, less estimated forfeitures. For performance-based awards, compensation cost will be recognized when the achievement of the performance condition is considered probable. If a performance condition has more than one outcome that is probable, recognition of compensation cost will be based on the condition that is the most likely outcome. No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility, and amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our exposure to risk related to our derivative instruments totaled $13 million and $4 million, respectively, and the counterparties to such instruments are investment grade financial institutions. Our credit risk exposure with regard to our cash and the $796 million available under our credit facility is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions.

Business Combinations

We recognize identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in a business combination at their fair values at the acquisition date based on the exit price (i.e. the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date). We evaluate several factors, including market data for similar assets, expected cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates and replacement cost for the assets to determine an

107


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

appropriate exit cost when evaluating the fair value of our assets. Property and equipment are recorded at fair value and such fair value is allocated to buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment using appraisals and valuations performed by management and independent third parties. Acquisition-related costs, such as due diligence, legal and accounting fees, are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair value of the acquired assets.

Other items that we evaluate in a business combination include identifiable intangible assets, capital lease assets and obligations and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets typically consist of assumed contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. Capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest are measured at fair value and are included as debt on the accompanying balance sheet and we record the corresponding right-to-use assets. Classification of a lease does not change if it is part of a business combination. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we may utilize a number of sources that arise in connection with the acquisition or financing of a property and other market data, including third-party appraisals and valuations. In certain situations, a deferred tax liability is recognized due to the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of the acquired assets at the acquisition date. Any consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired would be recorded to goodwill. In very limited circumstances, we may record a bargain purchase gain if the consideration paid is less than the net fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which affects virtually all aspects of an entity’s revenue recognition.  The core principle of the new standard is that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  We have not yet completed our assessment of the effect of the new standard on our financial statements, including possible transition alternatives.

2.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

1,990

 

 

$

1,973

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

13,336

 

 

 

13,435

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

2,217

 

 

 

2,223

 

Construction in progress

 

 

209

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

 

17,752

 

 

 

17,807

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(7,177

)

 

 

(6,812

)

 

 

$

10,575

 

 

$

10,995

 

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10.4 billion at December 31, 2014.

108


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.

Investments in Affiliates

We own investments in joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The debt of the Euro JV and Asia/Pacific JV is non-recourse to, and not guaranteed by, us. The debt of the Hyatt Place JV and the construction loan for the Maui JV is jointly and/or severally guaranteed by the partners of the joint ventures. Investments in affiliates consist of the following (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

Ownership

 

 

Our

 

 

Our Portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interests

 

 

Investment

 

 

of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Assets

Euro JV

 

32.1 - 33.4

%

 

$

348

 

 

$

388

 

 

$

1,186

 

 

Nineteen hotels in Europe

Asia/Pacific JV

 

 

25

%

 

 

22

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

37

 

 

One hotel in Australia and a 36% interest in three operating hotels and four hotels under development in India

Maui JV

 

 

67

%

 

 

61

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

96

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii

Hyatt Place JV

 

 

50

%

 

 

7

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

31

 

 

One hotel in Nashville, Tennessee

Philadelphia

     Marriott

     Downtown

 

 

11

%

 

 

(5

)

 

 

25

 

 

 

227

 

 

One hotel in Philadelphia, PA

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

433

 

 

$

502

 

 

$

1,577

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Ownership

 

 

Our

 

 

Our Portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interests

 

 

Investment

 

 

of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Assets

Euro JV

 

32.1 - 33.4

%

 

$

374

 

 

$

444

 

 

$

1,363

 

 

Nineteen hotels in Europe

Asia/Pacific JV

 

 

25

%

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

39

 

 

One hotel in Australia and a 36% interest in two operating hotels and five hotels under development in India

Maui JV

 

 

67

%

 

 

16

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

50

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii

Hyatt Place JV

 

 

50

%

 

 

5

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

24

 

 

One hotel in Nashville, Tennessee

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

415

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

1,476

 

 

 

European Joint Venture

We own general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV that consists of two separate funds, with the other partners thereof including APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). We own a combined 32.1% ownership interest of Euro JV Fund I and a combined 33.4% interest of Euro JV Fund II. We do not consolidate the Euro JV due to the ownership structure and substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partners, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditures budgets. The joint venture agreement expires in 2021, subject to two one-year extensions. As of December 31, 2014, the total assets of the Euro JV are approximately €1.9 billion ($2.3 billion). As asset manager of the Euro JV funds, we earn asset management fees based on the amount of equity commitments and equity invested, which in 2014, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $16 million, $15 million and $13 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2014, the partners have funded approximately €647 million, or 94%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I and €364 million, or 81%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund II. On April 17, 2013 and June 25, 2013, the Euro JV partners executed amendments of the Euro JV partnership agreement in order to provide the funds necessary for a €95 million principal reduction associated with the refinancing of a mortgage loan secured by a portfolio of six properties, as well as to provide funds for general joint venture purposes, to extend the commitment period of Euro JV Fund I to December 2015 and to extend the commitment period of Euro JV Fund II by one year to June 2014 through the exercise of the extension option. Effective June 27, 2014, the Euro JV partners executed an amendment and restatement of the Euro JV partnership agreement which allows contributions to the joint venture in the form of loans, as opposed to only equity contributions and amended the agreement to extend the commitment period for Euro JV Fund II by one year to June 27, 2015. The partners expect to utilize the remaining equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I for capital expenditures and financing needs.

109


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In April 2014, the Euro JV made a cash distribution to its partners totaling €37 million, of which Host’s share was €12 million ($17 million).

On September 30, 2014, Euro JV Fund II acquired a 90% ownership interest in the 394-room Grand Hotel Esplanade in Berlin. The hotel was acquired based on an aggregate gross value of €81 million ($102 million), and is subject to a mortgage loan of approximately €48 million ($61 million) with a margin of 219 basis points over the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“Euribor”). The loan is non-recourse to the Euro JV. We contributed approximately €10 million ($14 million) to the Euro JV in connection with this acquisition, partially funded through a draw on our credit facility.

On October 16, 2014, the Euro JV Fund I sold the 350-room Sheraton Skyline Hotel & Conference Centre for £33 million ($53 million) plus certain customary closing adjustments and recognized a gain of approximately £8 million ($12 million). In connection with the sale, the Euro JV repaid the associated mortgage loan of £21.1 million ($34 million).

On August 29, 2013, Euro JV Fund II acquired the 465-room Sheraton Stockholm Hotel in Sweden for approximately €102 million ($135 million). In connection with the acquisition, the Euro JV entered into a €61 million ($81 million) mortgage loan with an interest rate of 5.67% that matures in 2018. The loan is non-recourse to the Euro JV. We contributed approximately €14 million ($19 million) to the Euro JV in connection with this acquisition, funded through a draw on our credit facility.    

On October 22, 2013, Euro JV Fund II sold the Courtyard Paris La Defense West – Colombes for €19 million ($26 million) plus certain customary closing adjustments and recognized a gain of approximately €1.7 million ($2.3 million). In connection with the sale, the Euro JV repaid the associated €10.4 million ($14.4 million) mortgage loan.  

The Euro JV has €980 million ($1,186 million) of mortgage debt, including debt incurred in its recent acquisitions, all of which is non-recourse to us. A default of the Euro JV mortgage debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. On July 3, 2014, the Euro JV refinanced the €69 million ($94 million) loan secured by three properties in Brussels with Natixis, reducing the outstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan to €47.8 million using funds provided by the partners. Interest on the new loan is a combination of fixed and floating for an initial all-in rate of 2.0% and has a maturity date of July 3, 2019. On June 20, 2013, the Euro JV refinanced a mortgage loan secured by six properties, extending the maturity date to 2016, with a one year extension option subject to meeting certain conditions. The loan has a fixed and floating rate component with an initial interest rate of 4.5%. In connection with the refinancing, the joint venture reduced the outstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan from €337 million ($446 million) to €242 million ($320 million). We funded our portion of the principal reduction, as well as certain closing costs and other funding requirements, through a €37 million ($48 million) draw on our credit facility.

We have entered into four foreign currency forward sale contracts in order to hedge the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the Euro JV. The forward purchases will occur between August 2015 and May 2017. We have hedged €177 million (approximately $228 million) of our investment through these contracts and designated draws under our credit facility in Euros. See Note 12 – “Fair Value Measurement” for further information.            

Our unconsolidated investees analyze their properties for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. A property is considered to be impaired when the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows over its remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying amount of the asset. If a property is impaired, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the hotel. In 2013, we recognized an expense of approximately $15 million reflecting our share of the impairment of one such property in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates.

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

We own a 25% general and limited partner interest in the Asia/Pacific JV, the other partner of which is RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. The Asia/Pacific JV may be terminated after a period of seven years, which occurs in March of 2015. Due to the ownership structure and the substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partner, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditures budgets, the Asia/Pacific JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. The commitment period for the equity contributions to the joint venture expired in March of 2012. As a result, unanimous approval of the joint venture partners is necessary to fund additional acquisitions. Certain funding commitments remain, however, related to existing investments.

As of December 31, 2014, the Asia/Pacific JV partners have invested approximately $83 million (of which our share was $21 million) in a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited, in which the Asia/Pacific JV holds a 36% interest. This joint venture owns two hotels in Bangalore and one in Chennai and is developing four additional properties in Chennai

110


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

and Delhi. The three hotels that are operating and the four hotels under development will be managed by Accor under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands.  

Maui Joint Venture

In December 2014, we opened Hyatt Ka’anapali Beach, A Hyatt Residence Club, in which we hold a 67% non-controlling interest. The 131–unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii is adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. The development costs were funded with a $110 million construction loan and member contributions. As of December 31, 2014, $86 million has been drawn on the construction loan. The construction loan is jointly and severally guaranteed by both partners and matures in December 2015. Additionally, the joint venture has issued $10 million of debt to fund loans to the timeshare owners, which loans all are nonrecourse to Host.  As of December 31, 2014, we have contributed land valued at $36 million, approximately $8 million of pre-formation expenditures and additional contributions of $43 million. Development costs as of December 31, 2014 totaled $180 million. In 2014, sales of the timeshares totaled $54 million.

Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Investees

Combined summarized balance sheet information for our affiliates is as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

2,369

 

 

$

2,362

 

Timeshare inventory

 

 

178

 

 

 

106

 

Other assets

 

 

424

 

 

 

376

 

Total assets

 

$

2,971

 

 

$

2,844

 

Debt

 

$

1,577

 

 

$

1,476

 

Other liabilities

 

 

163

 

 

 

135

 

Equity

 

 

1,231

 

 

 

1,233

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

2,971

 

 

$

2,844

 

Combined summarized operating results for our affiliates is as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Total revenues

 

$

776

 

 

$

617

 

 

$

428

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

(568

)

 

 

(489

)

 

 

(346

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(91

)

 

 

(131

)

 

 

(56

)

Operating profit (loss)

 

 

117

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

26

 

Interest expense

 

 

(79

)

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(43

)

Gain on disposition

 

 

12

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

50

 

 

$

(60

)

 

$

(17

)

111


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.

Debt

Debt consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6¾% due June 2016

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Series X senior notes, with a rate of 5⅞% due June 2019

 

 

498

 

 

 

497

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

 

300

 

 

 

300

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

350

 

 

 

350

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

450

 

 

 

450

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

400

 

 

 

400

 

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2½% due October 2029

 

 

386

 

 

 

371

 

Total senior notes

 

 

2,884

 

 

 

3,018

 

Credit facility revolver

 

 

204

 

 

 

446

 

Credit facility term loan due June 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 5.0% and 4.1% at

     December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, maturing through January 2024

 

 

404

 

 

 

709

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

$

3,992

 

 

$

4,759

 

Senior Notes

General. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, which includes our Exchangeable Senior Debentures, our senior notes are equal in right of payment with all of our unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to all of our subordinated obligations. The face amount of our senior notes as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $2.9 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. The senior notes balance as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes discounts of approximately $16 million and $32 million, respectively. We pay interest on each series of our senior notes semi-annually in arrears at the respective annual rates indicated in the table above.

Under the terms of the senior notes indenture, our ability to incur indebtedness and pay dividends is subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions. As of December 31, 2014, we are in compliance with all of these covenants.

We completed the following senior notes transactions:  

In February 2014, we redeemed the remaining $150 million 6¾ Series Q senior notes due 2016 for an aggregate price of $152 million.

We redeemed $400 million ($200 million in June 2013 and $200 million in September 2013) of our 6¾% Series Q senior notes due 2016, for an aggregate price of $404 million, using proceeds from debt issuances and asset dispositions.

On March 19, 2013, we issued $400 million of our 3 34% Series D senior notes due October of 2023 for net proceeds of approximately $396 million. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series D senior notes, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem the $400 million of our 9% Series T senior notes due 2017 at an aggregate price of $418 million in May 2013.

In March 2013, holders of $174 million face amount of our 314% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) elected to exchange their debentures for shares of Host Inc. common stock totaling approximately 11.7 million shares, rather than receive the cash redemption proceeds. In connection with this exchange, Host L.P. issued 11.5 million common OP units. The remaining $1 million of debentures were redeemed for cash.

Exchangeable Debentures. As of December 31, 2014, we have $400 million of 212% exchangeable senior debentures outstanding that were issued on December 22, 2009 (the “2009 Debentures”). The 2009 Debentures are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes. Holders have the right to require us to purchase the 2009 Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued interest (the “put option”) on October 15, 2015 and on certain subsequent dates. Holders of the 2009 Debentures also have the right to exchange the 2009 Debentures prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock is more than 130% ($16.71) of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the calendar quarter or at any time up to two days prior to the date on which the 2009 Debentures have been called for redemption. We can redeem for cash all, or part of, any of the 2009 Debentures at any time

112


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

subsequent to October 20, 2015, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. If, at any time, we elect to redeem the 2009 Debentures and the exchange value exceeds the cash redemption price, we would expect the holders to elect to exchange the 2009 Debentures at the respective exchange value rather than receive the cash redemption price. The exchange value is equal to the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Upon exchange, the 2009 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, cash, or a combination thereof, at our option. Based on Host Inc.’s stock price at December 31, 2014, the if-converted value of the 2009 Debentures would exceed the outstanding principal amount by $339 million. As of December 31, 2014, the closing price of Host Inc.‘s common stock exceeded 130% of the exchange price for more than 20 of 30 consecutive trading days. Therefore, the 2009 Debentures are exchangeable by holders through March 31, 2015. Currently, each $1,000 Debenture would be exchanged for 77.8265 Host Inc. common shares (for an equivalent per share price of $12.85), for a total of 31.1 million shares.

We separately account for the liability and equity components of our 2009 Debentures in order to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, we recorded the liability components of the 2009 Debentures at fair value as of the date of issuance and will amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense through the initial put option date of the 2009 Debentures, which is the expected life of the debt. However, there is no effect of this accounting treatment on our cash interest payments. We measured the fair value of the liability components of the 2009 Debentures at issuance based on an effective interest rate of 6.9%. The initial allocations between the liability and equity components of the 2009 Debentures, net of the original issue discount, based on the effective interest rate at the time of issuance was $316 million and $82 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the debt carrying value and unamortized discount were $386 million and $14 million, respectively.

Interest expense recorded for our exchangeable senior debentures (including interest expense for debentures redeemed in 2013 and 2012) consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Contractual interest expense (cash)

 

$

10

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

19

 

Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization

 

 

16

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

17

 

Total interest expense

 

$

26

 

 

$

25

 

 

$

36

 

Authorization for Repurchase of Senior Notes and Exchangeable Senior Debentures. In February 2015, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of up to $500 million of senior notes, exchangeable senior debentures and mortgage debt (other than in accordance with their terms).      

Credit Facility. On June 27, 2014, we entered into a new senior revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and certain other agents and lenders. The credit facility allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, including a foreign currency subfacility for Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, New Zealand dollars, Japanese yen, Euros, British pound sterling and, if available to the lenders, Mexican peso, of up to the foreign currency equivalent of $500 million, subject to a lower amount in the case of New Zealand dollar and Mexican peso borrowings. The credit facility also provides a subfacility of up to $100 million for swingline borrowings in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros and British pound sterling and a subfacility of up to $100 million for issuances of letters of credit. Host L.P. also has the option to increase the aggregate principal amount of the credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions. The credit facility has an initial scheduled maturity of June 2018, with two six-month renewal options. The credit facility contained a term loan facility of $500 million, which replaced and refinanced the term loan under our prior facility of like amount. The term loan facility has an initial scheduled maturity of June 2017, with two one-year renewal options, resulting in a maturity for the entire credit facility in June 2019, if all renewal options are exercised, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee and the accuracy of representations and warranties.

We had the following transactions under this credit facility during 2014 and 2013 (draws used for bridge financing to facilitate transactions are not included in the below discussion):

On January 10, 2014, we repaid $225 million on the revolver portion of our credit facility and as of December 31, 2014, we have $796 million of available capacity.  

113


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In 2013, we drew $68 million in net proceeds in Euros on the revolver portion of our credit facility, primarily to facilitate acquisitions and a debt refinancing related to our investment in the Euro JV.

In 2013, we also drew $118 million of net proceeds of the revolver portion of our credit facility in U.S. dollars (net of a $7 million repayment of our draw in Australian dollars) primarily to facilitate the redemption of the Series Q senior notes.

Financial Covenants. The credit facility contains covenants concerning allowable leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage (as defined in our credit facility). Currently, we are permitted to borrow and maintain amounts outstanding under the credit facility so long as our leverage ratio is not in excess of 7.25x, our unsecured coverage ratio is not less than 1.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.25x. The financial covenants for the credit facility do not apply when there are no borrowings under the credit facility. Therefore, so long as there are no amounts outstanding, we would not be in default if we do not satisfy the financial covenants and we do not lose the potential to draw under the credit facility in the future if we were to regain compliance with the financial covenants. These calculations are performed based on pro forma results for the prior four fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of the credit facility, interest expense excludes items such as gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at issuance of a loan in order to establish the debt at fair value and non-cash interest expense due to the implementation in 2009 of accounting standards related to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept, under which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance. As of December 31, 2014, we are in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit facility.

Collateral and Guarantees. The credit facility initially does not include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests in our subsidiaries, and the guarantees and pledges are required only in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges ratably would benefit the credit facility, as well as the notes outstanding under Host L.P.’s senior notes indenture, interest rate and currency hedges and certain other hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. Even when triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would provide neither guarantees nor pledges of equity interests. As of December 31, 2014, our leverage ratio was 2.6x.

Interest and Fees. We pay interest on revolver borrowings under the credit facility at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 87.5 to 155 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). We also pay a facility fee ranging from 12.5 to 30 basis points, depending on our rating and regardless of usage. Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating as of December 31, 2014, we are able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 100 basis points and pay a facility fee of 20 basis points. Interest on the term loan consists of floating rates plus a margin ranging from 90 to 175 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating at December 31, 2014, the margin is 112.5 basis points for an all-in interest rate of 1.29%.  

Other Covenants and Events of Default. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants on customary matters. Certain covenants become less restrictive at any time that our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x. In particular, at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, we will not be subject to limitations on capital expenditures, and the limitations on acquisitions, investments and dividends contained in the credit facility will be superseded by the generally less restrictive corresponding covenants in our senior notes indenture. Additionally, the credit facility’s restrictions on the incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends generally are consistent with our senior notes indenture for our Series D senior notes. These provisions, under certain circumstances, limit debt incurrence to debt incurred under the credit facility or in connection with a refinancing, and limit dividend payments to those necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s tax status as a REIT. Our senior notes and credit facility have cross default provisions that would trigger a default under those agreements if we were to have a payment default or an acceleration prior to maturity of other debt of Host L.P. or its subsidiaries. The amount of other debt in default needs to exceed certain thresholds in order to trigger a cross default and the thresholds are greater for secured debt than for unsecured debt. The credit facility also includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature, and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, payment of all amounts owed under the credit facility may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts owed under the credit facility will become due and payable and the lenders’ commitments will terminate.

114


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Mortgage Debt

All of our mortgage debt is recourse solely to specific assets, except for environmental liabilities, fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions. As of December 31, 2014, we have mortgage debt secured by 10 assets, with an average interest rate of 5.0%, which mortgage debt matures between 2016 and 2024. Interest is payable monthly. As of December 31, 2014, we are in compliance with the covenants under all of our mortgage debt obligations.

We had the following mortgage debt issuances and repayments since January 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Property

 

Rate

 

 

Date

 

Amount

 

Issuances/Assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

December 2013

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

4.75

%

 

1/1/2024

 

$

150

 

Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel

 

 

3.25

%

 

3/1/2014

 

 

(300

)

December 2013

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

5.55

%

 

3/1/2014

 

 

(134

)

December 2013

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

8.51

%

 

12/11/2023

 

 

(31

)

May 2013

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

4.75

%

 

7/1/2013

 

 

(246

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate Debt Maturities

Aggregate debt maturities are as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

2015

 

$

400

 

2016

 

 

253

 

2017

 

 

500

 

2018

 

 

204

 

2019

 

 

500

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,150

 

 

 

 

4,007

 

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

 

 

(16

)

Capital lease obligations

 

 

1

 

 

 

$

3,992

 

Other

On October 30, 2014 we redeemed the $12 million 7.125% Dulles Airport Industrial Development Revenue Bonds. On June 25, 2014, we redeemed the $40 million 7.75% Philadelphia Airport Industrial Development Revenue Bonds. Additionally, on June 15, 2014, we redeemed the $32 million 7% Newark Airport Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds.

115


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interest

The following items are included in interest expense (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014(1)

 

 

2013(1)

 

 

2012(1)

 

Interest expense

 

$

214

 

 

$

304

 

 

$

373

 

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net (2)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(18

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(12

)

Non-cash losses on debt extinguishments

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(9

)

Change in accrued interest

 

 

1

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

4

 

Interest paid (3)

 

$

189

 

 

$

282

 

 

$

338

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Interest expense and interest paid for 2014, 2013 and 2012 include cash prepayment premiums of approximately $2 million, $23 million and $21 million, respectively.

(2)

Primarily represents the amortization of the debt discount on our Debentures, which is considered non-cash interest expense.

(3)

Does not include capitalized interest of $7 million, $6 million and $6 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Our debt repayments resulted in debt extinguishment costs included in interest expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012 of $4 million, $36 million and $30 million, respectively.

5.

Equity of Host Inc. and Capital of Host L.P.

Equity of Host Inc.

Host Inc. has authorized 1,050 million shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, of which 755.8 million and 754.8 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Fifty million shares of no par value preferred stock are authorized; none of such preferred shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Capital of Host L.P.

As of December 31, 2014, Host Inc. is the owner of approximately 99% of Host L.P.’s common OP units. The remaining 1% of Host L.P.’s common OP units are held by various unaffiliated limited partners. Each common OP unit may be redeemed for cash or, at the election of Host Inc., Host Inc. common stock, based on the conversion ratio of 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock for each OP unit. In connection with the issuance of shares by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue OP units based on the same conversion ratio. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, Host L.P. has 749.1 million and 748.4 million OP units outstanding, respectively, of which Host Inc. held 739.9 million and 738.9 million, respectively.

Issuances of Common Stock and Common OP Units

During 2013, Host Inc. issued 16.9 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $17.78 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $297 million. These issuances were made in “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to Sales Agency Financing Agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. In connection with the common stock issuance, Host L.P. issued 16.5 million common OP units. These issuances completed the capacity under the current agreements.

During March 2013, $174 million of the 2004 Debentures were exchanged for shares of Host Inc. common stock, totaling approximately 11.7 million shares. In connection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued 11.5 million common OP units.

Dividends/Distributions

Host Inc. is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash. Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends on its common stock are provided through distributions from Host L.P. The amount of any future dividends will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

116


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2014 were considered 65% ordinary income, 22% capital gain distribution and 13% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain. The dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2013 were considered 96.5% ordinary income and 3.5% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain. No portion of these 2014 and 2013 dividends was considered qualified dividends subject to a reduced tax rate.

The table below presents the amount of common dividends declared per share and common distributions per unit as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Common stock

 

$

.75

 

 

$

.46

 

 

$

.30

 

Common OP units

 

 

.766

 

 

 

.470

 

 

 

.306

 

On February 17, 2015, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on Host Inc.’s common stock. The dividend is payable on April 15, 2015, to stockholders of record on March 31, 2015.

117


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.

Income Taxes

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1999. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders, excluding net capital gain. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of our taxable income that currently is distributed to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal corporate income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

We have recorded a 100% valuation allowance of approximately $27 million against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and asset tax credit carryovers as of December 31, 2014 with respect to our hotel in Mexico. There is a $4 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and capital loss carryovers as of December 31, 2014 with respect to our hotels in Canada. There is a $4 million valuation allowance related to the net operating loss incurred by our office in Rio de Janeiro as of December 31, 2014. Finally, there is a $10 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss carryovers as of December 31, 2014 with respect to certain of our U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries that acted as lessee pursuant to the terminated HPT leases. We expect that the remaining net operating loss and alternative minimum tax credit carryovers for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be realized. The net decrease in the valuation allowance for the year ending December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is approximately $16 million and $2 million, respectively. The primary components of our net deferred tax assets are as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued related party interest

 

$

21

 

 

$

19

 

Net operating loss and capital loss carryovers

 

 

70

 

 

 

85

 

Alternative minimum tax credits

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Property and equipment

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Investments in domestic affiliates

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Deferred revenue and expenses

 

 

55

 

 

 

57

 

Other

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

 

159

 

 

 

174

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

 

(45

)

 

 

(61

)

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

$

114

 

 

$

113

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

 

(17

)

 

 

(21

)

Investments in domestic and foreign affiliates

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(6

)

Other

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(3

)

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(30

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

87

 

 

$

83

 

At December 31, 2014, we have aggregate gross domestic and foreign net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $204 million. We have deferred tax assets related to these loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $70 million, with a valuation allowance of approximately $45 million. Our net operating loss carryovers expire through 2034, and our foreign capital loss carryovers have no expiration period. Our domestic alternative minimum tax credit carryovers have no expiration period and our foreign asset tax credit carryovers expire through 2017. We believe that it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, of $114 million in the future.

Our U.S. and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was as follows (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

U.S. income (loss)

$

744

 

 

$

213

 

 

$

(22

)

Foreign income

 

17

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

45

 

Total

$

761

 

 

$

231

 

 

$

23

 

118


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of (in millions):

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Current

—Federal

 

$

3

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

3

 

 

—State

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

—Foreign

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

14

 

Deferred

—Federal

 

 

(1

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

11

 

 

—State

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

—Foreign

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

6

 

 

 

17

 

Income tax provision – continuing operations

 

$

14

 

 

$

21

 

 

$

31

 

The differences between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax provision recorded for continuing operations are as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Statutory federal income tax provision – continuing operations

 

$

265

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

8

 

Adjustment for nontaxable (income) loss of Host Inc. –

     continuing operations

 

 

(268

)

 

 

(77

)

 

 

4

 

State income tax provision, net

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

2

 

Provision for uncertain tax positions

 

 

5

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Foreign income tax provision

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

15

 

Income tax provision – continuing operations

 

$

14

 

 

$

21

 

 

$

31

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, was $22 million, $17 million, and $12 million in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Balance at January 1

 

$

5

 

 

$

3

 

State increases

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Other increases

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

Balance at December 31

 

$

10

 

 

$

5

 

All of such uncertain tax position amounts, if recognized, would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax provision recorded each year.

We expect an increase to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date of approximately $4 million. As of December 31, 2014, the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2011-2014.

There were no material interest or penalties recognized for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

7.

Leases

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries Leases

We lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a REIT’s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel.

119


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Vornado Lease

On July 30, 2012, we leased the retail and signage components of the New York Marriott Marquis to Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”). Vornado will redevelop and expand the existing retail space and a portion of the parking garage into a high-end retail space, as well as create a 25,000 square foot, block front, LED signage. The lease has a 20-year term and, over the term of the lease, each party has options that, if exercised, would result in ownership of the retail space being conveyed to Vornado at a price based on the future cash flow of the leased property. Minimum rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The future minimum rental revenue under the non-cancelable lease is $12.5 million on an annual basis. Percentage rent is accrued when the specified income targets have been met.

Ground Leases

As of December 31, 2014, all or a portion of 35 of our hotels are subject to ground leases, generally with multiple renewal options, all of which are accounted for as operating leases. For lease agreements with scheduled rent increases, we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease. Certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts.    

Hospitality Properties Trust

We owned a leasehold interest in 53 Courtyard by Marriott hotels, which were sold to Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) and leased back to us in 1995. In connection with our conversion to a REIT, we entered into subleases with a subsidiary of Barceló Crestline Corporation (“Barceló”) for these properties and Barceló guaranteed rent payments to HPT as part of the sublease. We terminated the subleases effective July 6, 2010 and resumed acting as owner under the management agreements. Effective upon termination of the subleases, we recorded the operations of the hotels as opposed to rental income. We terminated the lease effective December 31, 2012. At the expiration of the lease in 2012, HPT paid us deferred proceeds related to the initial sale of approximately $51 million. Approximately $11 million related to tenant collections accounts and $5 million for working capital were received in 2013.

Other Lease Information

We also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business, all of which we subsequently subleased. These leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options, generally for five or ten-year periods. The restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases. Our contingent liability related to these leases is $13 million as of December 31, 2014. However, management considers the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote. Our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment, such as computer equipment, vehicles and telephone systems. Equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases, depending on the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement. Equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease. The amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense.

The following table presents the future minimum annual rental commitments required under non-cancelable leases for which we are the lessee (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

2015

 

$

1

 

 

$

46

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

1,572

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

1

 

 

$

1,788

 

Minimum payments for the operating leases have not been reduced by aggregate minimum sublease rentals from restaurants of approximately $10 million per year that are payable to us under non-cancelable subleases.

120


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Rent expense is included in other property-level expenses on our consolidated statements of operations and consists of (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Minimum rentals on operating leases

 

$

48

 

 

$

50

 

 

$

117

 

Additional rentals based on sales

 

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

31

 

Rental payments based on real estate tax assessments

 

 

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

Less: sublease rentals

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

168

 

8.

Employee Stock Plans

Upon the issuance of Host Inc.’s common stock under either of the two stock-based compensation plans described below, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. Accordingly, these liabilities and related disclosures are included in both Host Inc.’s and Host L.P.’s consolidated financial statements.

Host Inc. maintains two stock-based compensation plans, the Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2009 Comprehensive Plan”), under which Host Inc. may award to participating employees restricted stock awards of Host Inc.’s common stock and options to purchase our common stock and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). At December 31, 2014, there were approximately 17 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2009 Comprehensive Plan.

We recognize costs resulting from share-based payments in our financial statements over their vesting periods. No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services as either equity or liability awards. Equity awards are measured based on their fair value as of the date of grant. In contrast, liability awards are re-measured to fair value each reporting period.

During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $22 million, $18 million and $16 million, respectively. Shares granted in 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled 2.0 million, 2.2 million and 1.8 million, respectively, while 1.3 million, 1.2 million and 0.9 million shares, respectively, vested during those years.

Senior Executive Plan

During 2014, Host Inc. granted 1.5 million shares of restricted stock awards and 0.4 million shares of stock option awards, to senior executives (the “Annual Plan”), which amount represents the maximum number of shares that can be earned during the year if performance is at the “high” level of achievement. The stock option awards have an exercise price of $19.57 per share for performance year 2014. The restricted stock awards and stock option awards vest on an annual basis; therefore, no awards were outstanding at December 31, 2014.

Restricted stock awards

Vesting of restricted stock awards is based on (1) the achievement of relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) and (2) the company and personal performance of employees attributable to specific management business objectives. Approximately 50% of the restricted stock awards are based on the satisfaction of the TSR compared to (i) the NAREIT index, (ii) the Standard & Poor’s index, and (iii) a Selected Lodging Company index that serves as a relevant industry/asset specific measurement to our competitors, with the remaining 50% based on the achievement of management business objectives. Restricted stock awards granted to U.S. senior executives are classified as liability awards, due to settlement features that allow the recipient to have a percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet tax requirements in excess of the statutory minimum withholding requirements. The fair value of these shares is adjusted at each balance sheet date and, at year end, is equal to the number of shares earned during the year at the December 31, 2014 stock price. Of the awards granted in 2014, 94% were classified as liability awards. In contrast, restricted stock awards granted to senior executives operating out of our international offices do not have this settlement feature and are considered equity awards. The fair value of these equity awards is based on the fair value on the grant date, and is not adjusted for subsequent movements in fair value.

121


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded compensation expense of approximately $18 million, $14 million and $12 million, respectively, related to the restricted stock awards to senior executives. The following table is a summary of the status of our senior executive plans for the three years ended December 31, 2014:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

Balance, at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

14

 

Vested (1)

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

24

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

16

 

Forfeited/expired

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

24

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

16

 

Balance, at end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued in calendar year (1)

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

16

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Shares that vest at December 31 of each year are issued to the employees in the first quarter of the following year, although the requisite service period is complete. Accordingly, the 0.4 million shares issued in 2014 include shares vested at December 31, 2013, after adjusting for shares withheld to meet employee tax requirements. The shares withheld for employee tax requirements were valued at $6.1 million, $5.5 million and $9.5 million, for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock Option Awards

As of December 31, 2014, 0.8 million shares of stock option awards were outstanding and exercisable, with a weighted average remaining life of 8 years and a weighted average exercise price of $17.35 per share. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, stock option grants totaled 393,000, 420,000 and 201,000, respectively. Stock option compensation expense was $1.8 million, $1.8 million and $1.6 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and all stock option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2014 were fully vested. The stock option awards are equity classified awards, as they do not include cash settlement features. We expense stock option awards over the vesting period based on the estimated fair value of the options at the grant date using a binomial pricing model. The utilization of the binomial model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of our common stock, risk-free interest rates and the amount of our awards expected to be forfeited, and our expected dividend yield. To calculate the fair value of stock option awards granted from 2012 to 2014, we assumed (i) a volatility ranging between 34% and 66%, (ii) a risk free rate ranging between 1.0% and 1.8%, (iii) a dividend yield of 3.5%, and (iv) an expected life of 5.5 years.

Other Stock Plans

In addition to the share-based plans described above, we maintain an upper-middle management plan and an employee stock purchase plan. The awards are time-based equity awards that vest within three years of the grant date and expense is recognized over the life of the award based on the grant date fair value. Through the employee stock purchase plan, employees can purchase stock at a 10% discount of the lower of the beginning and ending stock price each quarter. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we granted 118,000 shares, 116,000 shares and 84,000 shares, respectively, under both of these programs and recorded expense of $2.2 million, $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

9.

Profit Sharing and Postemployment Benefit Plans

We contribute to defined contribution plans for the benefit of employees who meet certain eligibility requirements and who elect participation in the plans. The discretionary amount to be matched by us is determined annually by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors. Our recorded liability for this obligation is not material. Payments for these items were not material for the three years ended December 31, 2014.

122


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.

Dispositions

We disposed of five hotels in 2014, five hotels in 2013, and three hotels in 2012. Effective January 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2014-08, Reporting for Discontinued Operations. As a result, operations and any gain or loss on sale of hotels sold subsequent to December 31, 2013 will continue to be reported in continuing operations. The results of properties sold in 2013 and 2012, including the gain on sale, will continue to be reported in discontinued operations

The following table provides summary results of operations for the five hotels sold in 2014, which are included in continuing operations (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Revenues

 

$

72

 

 

$

182

 

Income before taxes

 

 

8

 

 

 

19

 

Gain on disposals

 

 

229

 

 

 

 

Dispositions in 2014 included (i) the Dayton Marriott for $21 million, (ii) the Greensboro-High Point Marriott Airport for $19 million, (iii) the Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina for $199 million, (iv) Courtyard Nashua for $10 million, and (v) an 89% controlling interest in the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown based on a gross sales price of $303 million.

In connection with the sale of Tampa Waterside Hotel & Marina, Greensboro-High Point Marriott Airport and the 89% interest in Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, we recorded gains of approximately $115 million, $3 million, and $111 million, respectively.

The following table provides summary results of operations for the five hotels sold in 2013 and the three hotels sold in 2012, which are included in discontinued operations (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Revenues

 

$

104

 

 

$

264

 

Income before taxes

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

Gain on disposals, net of tax

 

 

97

 

 

 

48

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Continuing operations, net of tax

 

$

203

 

 

$

(10

)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

114

 

 

 

71

 

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host L.P. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Continuing operations, net of tax

 

$

206

 

 

$

(9

)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

321

 

 

$

62

 

123


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.

Acquisitions

Business Combinations

We acquired two hotels during 2014 and recorded $2 million of acquisition related expenses and acquired one hotel during 2013 and recorded $1 million of acquisition related expenses. For 2014 and 2013, our business combinations were as follows:

On August 11, 2014, we acquired the 242-room b2 miami downtown hotel for approximately $58 million.

On January 21, 2014, we acquired the 151-room Powell Hotel in San Francisco, California, including retail space and the fee simple interest in the land, for approximately $75 million.

On May 31, 2013, we acquired the 426-room Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach in Honolulu, Hawaii for approximately $138.5 million.

Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property or an entity as a purchase transaction requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The purchase price allocations are estimated based on current available information.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for our 2014 and 2013 hotel acquisitions (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Property and equipment

 

$

131

 

 

$

138

 

FF&E Reserves and other assets

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

Total assets

 

 

134

 

 

 

139

 

Other liabilities

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

133

 

 

$

139

 

124


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our summarized unaudited consolidated pro forma results of operations, assuming the 2014 and 2013 hotel acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and excluding the acquisition costs discussed above, are as follows (in millions, except per share and per unit amounts):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Revenues

 

$

5,362

 

 

$

5,189

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

751

 

 

 

214

 

Net income

 

 

751

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

736

 

 

$

321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.27

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.16

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.28

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

.97

 

 

$

.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

745

 

 

$

325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.29

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.29

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

.99

 

 

$

.44

 

For 2014 and 2013, we have included $39 million and $15 million of revenues, respectively, and $7 million and $2 million of net income, respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations related to the operations of the hotels acquired in 2014 and 2013.

New Development and Other Asset Acquisitions

For 2014 and 2013, our new development and other asset acquisitions were as follows:

In the fourth quarter of 2014, we completed construction and opened the 149-room Novotel and 256-room ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico in Barra da Tijuca, both managed by Accor. We have invested approximately R$139 million ($65 million) in these hotels as of December 31, 2014.

On December 10, 2013, we made the final incremental payment of $19.9 million for the purchase of the fee simple interest in the land at the New York Marriott Marquis Times Square. In addition, $25 million of the payments made pursuant to the terms of the ground lease have been attributed to the purchase of the land. The purchase was completed in conjunction with our 2012 lease of the existing retail space to Vornado and its on-going redevelopment.

125


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.

Fair Value Measurements

Overview

Our recurring fair value measurements consist of the valuation of our derivative instruments, all of which are designated as accounting hedges. Non-recurring fair value measurements during 2014 and 2013 consisted of the impairment of two of our hotel properties, which were both sold during 2014.

The following table details the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as non-recurring fair value measurements that we completed during 2011 (there were none in 2010)2014 and 2013 due to the impairment of non-financial assets (in millions):

 

       Fair Value at Measurement Date Using 
   Balance at
December 31,
2011
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

        

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

  $6.7    $—      $6.7    $—    

Forward currency sale contracts (1)

   10.8     —       10.8     —    

Fair Value Measurements on a Non- recurring Basis:

        

Impaired hotel properties held and used (2)

   5     —       5     —    

Impaired hotel properties sold (2)

   —       —       6     —    

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

       Fair Value at Measurement Date Using 
   Balance at
December 31,
2010
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

        

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

  $10.6    $—      $10.6    $—    

Forward currency sale contracts (1)

   6.9     —       6.9     —    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

 

Balance at December 31,

2014

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

$

13

 

 

$

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired hotel properties sold (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

 

Balance at December 31,

2013

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired hotel properties held and used (2)

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

These derivative contracts have been designated as hedging instruments.

(2)

The fair value measurements are as of the measurement date of the impairment and may not reflect the book value as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively.

Impairment

During 2014, an impairment loss of $6 million was recorded related to the Dayton Marriott. The fair value was based on expected sale proceeds of the property, which property was sold on December 17, 2014. During 2013, an impairment loss of approximately $1 million was recorded related to the Courtyard Nashua. The fair value was based on expected sale proceeds of the property, which property was sold on February 12, 2014. The impairment losses are included in depreciation expense.

126


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Derivatives and Hedging

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.We have designated our floating-to-fixed interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. The purpose of the interest rate swaps is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in variable rate debt. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the swaps. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying balance sheets. The hedges were fully effective as of December 31, 2011.

In connection with the acquisition of the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf on April 29, 2011, we assumed an2014. The following table summarizes our interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of A$80 million ($86 million) related to its mortgage debt. In November 2011, as part of the refinancing of this loan, we paid approximately $1 million to settle the original swap and entered into a new interest rate swap with a notional amount of A$61.5 million ($60 million) and a maturity date of November 23, 2016. The purpose of the interest rate swap is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in the Reuters BBSY. As a result, we will pay an all-in rate of 6.7% on the notional amount of the swap. We designated the derivative as a cash flow hedge. As a result of the change in fair value of this swap, a $0.3 million loss was recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. As of December 31, 2011, we recorded a liability of $0.4 million related to the fair value of this swap.

On February 18, 2011, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of NZ$79 million ($60 million) related to the mortgage debt on the seven properties acquired in New Zealand on February 18, 2011. We entered into the swap in order to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in the 3-month NZ$ Bank Bill rate. As a result, we will pay an all-in rate of 7.15% on the notional amount of the swap. We have designated the derivative as a cash flow hedge. As a result of the change in fair value of this derivative, a $2.7 million loss was recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. As of December 31, 2011, we recorded a liability of $3.8 million related to the fair value of this swap.

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as fair value hedges.cash flow hedges (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

Total Notional

 

Maturity

 

Swapped

 

All-in-

 

Year ended December 31,

Transaction Date

 

Amount

 

Date

 

Index

 

Rate

 

2014

 

2013

November 2011 (1)

 

A$

62

 

November 2016

 

Reuters BBSY

 

6.7%

 

$

 

$

1

February 2011 (2)

 

NZ$

79

 

February 2016

 

NZ$ Bank Bill

 

7.15%

 

$

 

$

2

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The swap was entered into in connection with the A$86 million ($71 million) mortgage loan on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf.

(2)

The swap was entered into in connection with the NZ$105 million ($82 million) mortgage loan on seven properties in New Zealand.

Foreign Investment Hedging Instruments.We have designated our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap derivatives as fair value hedges. We enter into these derivative instruments to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that occur as a result of changes in market interest rates. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation of the fair value of the swaps. The changes in the fair value of the derivatives are largely offset by corresponding changes in the fair value of the underlying debt due to changes in the 3-month LIBOR rate, which change is recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the debt. Any difference between the change in the fair value of the swap and the change in the fair value in the underlying debt, which was not significant for the periods presented, is considered the ineffective portion of the hedging relationship and is recognized in net income (loss).

We have three fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount totaling $300 million related to The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa mortgage loan in the amount of $300 million. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we recorded assets of $10.9 million and $10.6 million, respectively, related to the fair value of the swaps. During 2011 and 2010, the fair value of the swaps increased $0.3 million and $11.6 million, respectively. As a result, we will pay a floating interest rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus a spread which ranges from 2.7% to 3.2%, as opposed to the fixed rate of 5.531%, on the notional amount of $300 million through March 1, 2014.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Foreign Currency Forward Sale Contracts. We have sixfive foreign currency forward sale contracts that hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in foreign operations. These derivatives are considered hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation and are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheet. The foreign currency forward sale contracts are valued based on the forward yield curve of the foreign currency to U.S. Dollardollar forward exchange rate on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the derivatives. The following table summarizes our foreign currency forward sale contracts (in millions):

 

Transaction

Date Range

  Total
Transaction
Amount
in Foreign
Currency
   Total
Transaction
Amount
in Dollars
   Forward
Purchase
Date Range
   Fair Value
As of December  31,
   Change in Fair Value
Year  ended December 31,
 
        2011   2010   2011   2010 

February 2008-July 2011

  100    $140     
 
October 2012-
August 2015
  
  
  $8.8    $6.9    $1.9    $5.2  

July 2011

  NZ$30    $25     August 2013    $1.9    $—      $1.9    $—    

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value - All Contracts

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

Amount in

 

 

Total

Transaction

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction Date

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Forward Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

July 2011-May 2014

 

 

100

 

 

$

135

 

 

August 2015-May 2017

 

$

18

 

 

$

(5

)

November 2014

 

C$

 

25

 

 

$

22

 

 

November 2016

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

During 2011, we entered into

In addition to the followingforeign currency forward sale contracts, all of which are reflected in the chart above:

On July 15, 2011, we entered into two forward sale contracts totaling €50 million ($69 million) in order to hedgehave designated a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting fromdraws on our credit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. As a result, currency translation adjustments in the eventual repatriationdesignated credit facility draws are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our net investment in the Euro JV. Under the contract, we will sell the Euro amount and receive the U.S. dollar amount on the forward purchase dates of October 22, 2012 and August 18, 2015. Additionally, we entered into a forward purchase contract to net-settle the existing February 2008 €30 million foreign currency sale contract and received cash of $0.4 million on the settlement date of August 18, 2011. Following these transactions, we have hedged our foreign currency exposure related to €100 million ($140 million) of our net investment in the Euro JV.

On July 29, 2011, we entered into an NZ$30 million ($25 million) forward sale contract in order to hedgebalance sheet, which adjustments offset a portion of the translation adjustment related to our foreign currency exposure resulting frominvestments. The following table summarizes the eventual repatriationdraws on our credit facility that are designated as hedges of our net investmentinvestments in HHR New Zealand Holdings Limited. Under the contract, we will sell the NZ dollar amount and receive the U.S. dollar amount on August 2, 2013.international operations (in millions):

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding in

 

Year ended December 31,

Currency

 

US$

 

Foreign Currency

 

2014

 

2013

Canadian dollars (1)

 

$

27

 

C$

31

 

$

2

 

$

2

Euros

 

$

93

 

77

 

$

13

 

$

(5)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

We have drawn an additional $65 million on the credit facility in Canadian dollars that has not been designated as a hedging instrument.

127


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Other Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value of Other Financial Assets and Liabilities.We did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of our other financial assets or liabilities. Notes receivable and other financial assets are valued based on the expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates and are adjusted to reflect the effectsThe fair values of foreign currency translation. Valuations for secured debt and our credit facility are determined based on the expected future payments discounted at risk-adjusted rates. Senior Notes and the Exchangeable Senior Debentures are valued based on quoted market prices. The fair values of financial instruments not included in this table are estimated to be equal to their carrying amounts. The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities and other financial instruments are shown below (in millions):

 

   As of December 31, 
   2011   2010 
   Carrying
Amount
   Fair
Value
   Carrying
Amount
   Fair
Value
 

Financial assets

        

Mortgage notes

  $65    $76    $55    $77  

Financial liabilities

        

Senior notes

   3,641     3,772     3,093     3,200  

Exchangeable Senior Debentures

   902     1,076     1,156     1,471  

Credit facility

   117     117     58     58  

Mortgage debt and other, net of capital leases

   1,091     1,114     1,110     1,107  

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes (Level 1)

 

$

2,498

 

 

$

2,668

 

 

$

2,647

 

 

$

2,766

 

Exchangeable Senior Debentures (Level 1)

 

 

386

 

 

 

739

 

 

 

371

 

 

 

603

 

Credit facility (Level 2)

 

 

704

 

 

 

704

 

 

 

946

 

 

 

946

 

Mortgage debt and other, excluding capital leases

     (Level 2)

 

 

403

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

793

 

 

 

802

 

 

114.3.

Gain on Insurance Settlement

On February 22, 2011, Christchurch, New Zealand experienced an earthquake that resulted in substantial damage to two of the hotels we purchased as part of the seven hotel New Zealand portfolio in the first quarter of 2011. These hotels included the Hotel Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square and the Hotel ibis Christchurch. Repairs are in progress at both properties; however, the historic portion of the Novotel, the Warners building, has been demolished. The properties are expected to remain closed until at least the third quarter of 2012 and potentially longer. We believe we have sufficient coverage under the insurance policy of our property manager for both property and business interruption. We estimate that the economic loss will be capped at approximately $3 million based on the maximum deductible under our insurance policy and we accrued this loss in the second quarter of 2011. The city also experienced a second significant earthquake on June 13, 2011 and further aftershocks in December of 2011. While evaluations of the properties are ongoing, we do not believe the effects of these earthquakes and aftershocks were significant and have not accrued any additional losses.

During 2011, as a result of the earthquake, we estimate we incurred approximately $22 million of property damage, which amount represents the book value of the properties and equipment written off, and the related repairs and clean-up costs incurred. Gains on property insurance proceeds represent proceeds received in excess of the insurance receivable, which receivable represents the book value of the damaged assets that were written-off. Any gains resulting from insurance proceeds are not recognized until all contingencies are resolved. During 2011, we recognized a gain of $2 million for the receipt of business interruption insurance proceeds. As of December 31, 2011, we have received $8 million of cash and an outstanding insurance receivable of $13 million was included in other assets, representing claims for property damage and business interruption.

15.Relationship with Marriott International

We have entered into various agreements with Marriott, or one of their subsidiaries, including agreements for the management of approximately 61% of our owned hotels, the management of 53 hotels leased from HPT, financing for the JW Marriott, Mexico City, Mexico and certain limited administrative services.

In 2011, 2010 and 2009, we paid Marriott $119 million, $111 million and $105 million, respectively, of hotel management fees for our owned hotels and approximately $1 million in franchise fees for each of 2011, 2010 and 2009. Additionally, in 2011 and 2010, we paid $11 million and $7 million, respectively, of management fees for the hotels leased from HPT.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We enter into negotiations with Marriott from time to time in order to secure mutually beneficial modifications to the terms of management agreements on an individual or portfolio-wide basis, typically in connection with repositioning projects or substantial capital investments at our properties. We have negotiated amendments to various management agreements with Marriott and have agreed, among other matters, to waive performance termination tests, modify certain extension tests which condition the manager’s ability to renew the management agreements, and to extend certain contracts. As part of these negotiations, Marriott agreed to make cash payments to us, over time, to reduce an existing cap on the costs and expenses related to chain services that are provided on a centralized basis, as well as to establish a cap on certain other costs, to provide us with an incentive to increase our capital expenditures at the hotels, to waive certain deferred management fees and to modify the incentive management fee on certain contracts. We agreed to use a portion of Marriott’s cash payments for brand reinvestment projects at various hotels in our portfolio.

16.Hotel Management Agreements and Operating and License Agreements

All of our hotels are managed by third parties pursuant to management or operating agreements, with some of thoseour hotels also being subject to separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to operation under the designated brand. The hotel brands of three of our managers, Marriott, Starwood and Hyatt, represent 56%, 25% and 12% of our total revenues, respectively. Under these agreements, the managers generally have sole responsibility for all activities necessary for the day-to-day operation of the hotels, including establishing room rates, processing reservations and promoting and publicizing the hotels. The managers also provide all employees for the hotels, prepare reports, budgets and projections, and provide other administrative and accounting support services to the hotels. For the majority of our properties, we have approval rights over budgets, capital expenditures, significant leases and contractual commitments, and various other matters.

The initial term of our agreements generally is 15 to 25 years, with one or more renewal terms at the option of the manager. The majority of our agreements condition the manager’s right to exercise options for renewal upon the satisfaction of specified economic performance criteria. The manager typically receives a base management fee, which is calculated as a percentage (generally 2-3%) of annual gross revenues, and an incentive management fee, which typically is calculated as a percentage (generally 10-20%) of operating profit after the owner has received a priority return on its investment. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, the base management fee only is only 1% of annual gross revenues, but that amount is supplemented by license fees payable to Starwood under a separate license agreement pertaining to the designated brand, including rights to use trademarks, service marks and logos, matters relating to compliance with certain brand standards and policies, and the provision of certain system programs and centralized services. Under the license agreement Starwood generally receives 5% of gross revenues attributable to room sales and 2% of gross revenues attributable to food and beverage sales in addition to a base management fee.

As part of the agreements, the manager furnishes the hotels with certain chain services, which generally are generally provided on a central or regional basis to all hotels in the manager’s hotel system. Chain services include central training, advertising and promotion, national reservation systems, computerized payroll and accounting services, and such additional services as needed which may be more efficiently performed on a centralized basis. Costs and expenses incurred in providing such services are allocated among the hotels managed, owned or leased by the manager on a fair and equitable basis. In addition, our managers generally will sponsor a guest rewards program, the costs of which will be charged to all of the hotels that participate in such program.

We are obligated to provide the manager with sufficient funds, generally 5% of the revenue generated at the hotel, to cover the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels which normally are normally capitalized, and (b) replacements and renewals to the hotels’ furniture, fixtures and equipment. Under certain circumstances, we will be required to establish escrow accounts for such purposes under terms outlined in the agreements.

128


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We generally are limited in our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the hotels unless the transferee assumes the related management agreement. However, most agreements include owner rights to terminate the agreements on the basis of the manager’s failure to meet certain performance-based metrics. Typically, these criteria are subject to the manager’s ability to ‘cure’ and avoid termination by payment to us of specified deficiency amounts (or, in some instances, waiver of the right to receive specified future management fees).

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In addition to any performance-based or other termination rights, we have negotiated with Marriott, Starwood and Starwoodsome of our other managers specific termination rights related to specific agreements. These termination rights can take a number of different forms, including termination of agreements upon sale that leave the property unencumbered by any agreement; termination upon sale provided that the property continues to be operated under a license or franchise agreement with continued brand affiliation; as well as termination without sale or other condition, which may require the payment of a fee. These termination rights also may restrict the number of agreements that may be terminated over any annual or other period; impose limitations on the number of agreements terminated as measured by EBITDA; require that a certain number of properties continue to maintain the brand affiliation; or be restricted to a specific pool of assets.

117.4.

Geographic and Business Segment Information

We consider each one of our hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a reportable segment. We also allocate resources and assess operating performance based on individual hotels. All of our other real estate investment activities (primarily our office buildings) are immaterial and, with our operating segments, meet the aggregation criteria, and thus, we report one segment: hotel ownership. Our foreigninternational operations consist of hotels in six countries. In June 2011, we transferred our hotel in the United Kingdom to the Euro JV Fund II. There were no intersegment sales during the periods presented. The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for each of the geographical areas in which we operate (in millions):

 

  2011   2010   2009 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

  Revenues   Property
and
Equipment,
net
   Revenues   Property
and
Equipment,
net
   Revenues   Property
and
Equipment,
net
 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

United States

  $4,722    $10,874    $4,244    $10,095    $3,997    $10,013  

$

5,077

 

 

$

10,111

 

 

$

4,895

 

 

$

10,498

 

 

$

4,791

 

 

$

11,095

 

Australia

   27     136     —       —       —       —    

 

39

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

133

 

Brazil

   33     42     8     48     —       —    

 

36

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

39

 

Canada

   115     126     109     131     96     135  

 

87

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

97

 

Chile

   28     58     29     56     25     53  

 

32

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

63

 

Mexico

   24     23     21     29     17     30  

 

29

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

26

 

New Zealand

   32     124     —       —       —       —    

 

54

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

135

 

United Kingdom

   17     —       17     155     —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $4,998    $11,383    $4,428    $10,514    $4,135    $10,231  

$

5,354

 

 

$

10,575

 

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

10,995

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

11,588

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

118.5.

Guarantees and Contingencies

We have certain guarantees which consist of commitments made to third parties for leases or debt that are not recognized in our consolidated financial statements due to various dispositions, spin-offs and contractual arrangements, but that we have agreed to pay in the event of certain circumstances, including the default by an unrelated party. We also may have contingent environmental liabilities related to the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. We consider the likelihood of any material payments under these guarantees and contingencies to be remote. The guarantees and contingencies that are not recognized in our consolidated financial statements are listed below:

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $14 million as of December 31, 2011.

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $13 million as of December 31, 2014.

In connection with the sale of two hotels in January 2005, we remain contingently liable for the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $12 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that the likelihood of any material payments related to these ground leases is remote, and in each case, we have been indemnified by the purchaser of the hotel.

129


In 1997, we owned Leisure Park Venture Limited Partnership, which owns and operates a senior living facility. We spun-off the partnership to Barceló as part of the REIT conversion, but we remain obligated under a guarantee of interest and principal with respect to $14.7 million of municipal bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority through their maturity in 2027. However, to the extent we are required to make any payments under the guarantee, we have been indemnified by Barceló, who, in turn, is indemnified by the current owner of the facility.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Guarantees and environmental liabilities that are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet include:

In connection with the sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis in January 2013, we retained $5 million of contingent liabilities related to potential environmental liabilities.

In connection with the sale of the Ritz-Carlton San Francisco hotel in June 2013, we agreed to guarantee the hotel’s operating income through December 31, 2016.  During this period, we will make support payments of up to $4 million a year, not to exceed $11 million for the life of the agreement.  In 2014, we recognized approximately $3 million on the deferred gain. As of December 31, 2014, we have accrued $8 million for the guarantee.

16.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business regarding the operation of our hotels and company matters. To the extent not covered by insurance, these lawsuits generally fall into the following broad categories: disputes involving hotel-level contracts, employment litigation, compliance with laws such as the saleAmericans with Disabilities Act, tax disputes and other general matters. Under our management agreements, our operators have broad latitude to resolve individual hotel-level claims for amounts generally less than $150,000. However, for matters exceeding such threshold, our operators may not settle claims without our consent.

Based on our analysis of two hotelslegal proceedings with which we currently are involved or of which we are aware and our experience in January 2005,resolving similar claims in the past, we remain contingently liable forhave accrued approximately $35 million as of December 31, 2014. We have estimated that, in the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $13 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that the likelihood of any material paymentsaggregate, our losses related to these ground leases is remote, and in each case, we have been indemnified byproceedings could be as much as $57 million. We believe this range represents the purchasermaximum potential loss for all of the hotel.

our legal proceedings. We acquired two propertiesare not aware of any other matters with environmental liabilities, primarily asbestos in non-public areas of the properties,a reasonably possible unfavorable outcome for which we have recordeddisclosure of a loss contingency is required. No assurances can be given as to the present valueoutcome of the liability, or approximately $3 million. The amount is based on management’s estimate of the timing and future costs to remediate the liability. We will record the accretion expense over the period we intend to hold the hotel or until the item is remediated.any pending legal proceedings.

19.Legal Proceedings

On April 27,San Antonio Litigation.  In 2005 we initiated a lawsuit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) seeking a declaration that a provision of the ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we had tortuouslytortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property.

On February 8,In 2010, we received an adverse jury verdict in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The jury found that we tortuouslytortiously interfered with the attempted sale by Keystone of the land under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter and awarded Keystone $34.3 million in damages, plus statutory interest. In addition, the jury found that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property and awarded Keystone $39 million in damages, plus statutory interest. Keystone was only will be entitled to receive one of these damage awards. On February 12, 2010, theThe jury also awarded Keystone $7.5 million in exemplary damages with respect to the second claim. The trial court, however, subsequently granted our motion to disregard the jury’s exemplary damages award. On June 3, 2010, the trial court issued its final judgment, awarding Keystone: $39 million in damages for slander of title; alternatively, $34.3 million for tortuous interference of contract; as well as pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs.

On November 23,In 2011, a three-judge panel of the San Antonio Court of Appeals issued its memorandum opinion denying our appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2010 final judgment. In addition, the panel overturned the trial court’s decision to grant our motion to disregard the jury’s $7.5 million award of exemplary damages.

We believe that the memorandum opinion contains numerous legal errors and we intend to continue to vigorously pursue these issues on appeal. On January 17,In 2012, we filed a motion seeking rehearing fromPetition for Review in the three-judge panel and a motion for rehearing byTexas Supreme Court. On June 13, 2014, the entire seven-judgeTexas Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals. Based on the court decisions reached to date, we believe our maximum exposureappeals judgment, and Host was no longer liable for the jury verdict and punitive damages award. Keystone litigation is $63 million. After considerationrequested a rehearing of the range of possible outcomes, we have accruedTexas Supreme Court’s decision, but that motion was denied on October 3, 2014, finalizing the Texas Supreme Court’s decision. As a potential litigation loss of approximately $56 million.

We are involved in various legal proceedingsresult, in the normal coursethird quarter of business regarding2014, we reversed the operation of our hotels. To the extent not covered by insurance, these legal proceedings generally fall into the following broad categories: disputes involving hotel-level contracts, employment litigation, compliance with laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other general matters. Under our management agreements, our operators have broad latitude to resolve individual hotel-level claims generally for amounts less than $150,000. However, for matters exceeding such threshold, our operators may not settle claims without our consent. Based on our analysis of legal proceedings with which we are currently involved or of which we are aware and our experience in resolving similar claims in the past, we have accrued approximately $5$69 million as of December 31, 2011 and estimate that, in the aggregate, our lossesloss contingency previously recorded related to these proceedings could be as much as $12 million. We are not awarethis litigation and the initial adverse verdict. In addition, a court-ordered bond of any other matters with a reasonably possible negative outcome for which disclosure of a loss contingency is required. No assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings.$25 million was released on October 17, 2014.

130


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

120.7.

Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

 

   2011 
   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 
   (in millions, except per share/unit amounts) 
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:     

Revenues

  $902   $1,296   $1,142   $1,658  

Operating profit (loss)

   (3  152    55    119  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (59  67    (35  16  

Loss from discontinued operations

   (1  (3  —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (60  64    (35  16  

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

   (60  62    (33  17  

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

   (60  62    (33  17  

Basic income (loss) per common share:

     

Continuing operations

   (.09  .10    (.05  .02  

Discontinued operations

   —      (.01  —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.09  .09    (.05  .02  

Diluted income (loss) per common share:

     

Continuing operations

   (.09  .10    (.05  .02  

Discontinued operations

   —      (.01  —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.09  .09    (.05  .02  

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

     

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

   (61  63    (34  17  

Net income (loss) available to common unitholders

   (61  63    (34  17  

Basic income (loss) per common unit:

     

Continuing operations

   (.09  .10    (.05  .02  

Discontinued operations

   —      (.01  —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.09  .09    (.05  .02  

Diluted income (loss) per common unit:

     

Continuing operations

   (.09  .10    (.05  .02  

Discontinued operations

   —      (.01  —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.09  .09    (.05  .02  

 

 

2014

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,309

 

 

$

1,431

 

 

$

1,294

 

 

$

1,320

 

Operating profit

 

 

134

 

 

 

225

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

149

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

185

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

258

 

Net income

 

 

185

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

258

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

179

 

 

 

155

 

 

 

144

 

 

 

254

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.33

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.33

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

181

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

257

 

Basic earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 

Diluted earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.21

 

 

 

.19

 

 

 

.34

 


131


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

   2010 
   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 
   (in millions, except per share/unit amounts) 
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:      

Revenues

  $822   $1,112    $1,003   $1,491  

Operating profit (loss)

   (1  110     23    91  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (82  19     (61  (4

Loss from discontinued operations

   (2  —       —      (2

Net income (loss)

   (84  19     (61  (6

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

   (84  18     (58  (6

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

   (86  12     (58  (6

Basic income (loss) per common share:

      

Continuing operations

   (.13  .02     (.09  (.01

Discontinued operations

   —      —       —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.13  .02     (.09  (.01

Diluted income (loss) per common share:

      

Continuing operations

   (.13  .02     (.09  (.01

Discontinued operations

   —      —       —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.13  .02     (.09  (.01

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

      

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

   (85  18     (59  (6

Net income (loss) available to common unitholders

   (87  12     (59  (6

Basic income (loss) per common unit:

      

Continuing operations

   (.14  .02     (.09  (.01

Discontinued operations

   —      —       —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.14  .02     (.09  (.01

Diluted income (loss) per common unit:

      

Continuing operations

   (.14  .02     (.09  (.01

Discontinued operations

   —      —       —      —    

Net income (loss)

   (.14  .02     (.09  (.01

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,224

 

 

$

1,399

 

 

$

1,211

 

 

$

1,331

 

Operating profit

 

 

90

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

138

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

34

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

59

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

26

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

67

 

Net income

 

 

60

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

126

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

56

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

123

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.07

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.16

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.07

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.16

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

57

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

125

 

Basic earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.08

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.17

 

Diluted earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.08

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.17

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Other income statement line items not presented for Host L.P. are equal to the amounts presented for Host Inc.

The sum of the basic and diluted earnings per common share and OP units for the four quarters in all years presented differs from the annual earnings per common share and OP units due to the required method of computing the weighted average number of shares and OP units in the respective periods.


Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item  9A.

Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

Disclosure Controls and Procedure

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Host Inc. With the participation of Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20112014 based on the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.2014. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20112014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting of Host Inc., which appears in Item 8 of this report.8.

Controls and Procedures (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Host L.P. With the participation of Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20112014 based on the Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.2014. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20112014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of Host L.P.’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by Host L.P.’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to “non-accelerated filers.”

Item  9B.

Other Information

None.


PART III

Certain information called for by Items 10-14 is incorporated by reference from Host Inc.’s 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Notice and Proxy Statement (to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year).

Item 10.

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item with respect to directors is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors.” See Part I “Executive Officers” in Part I of this Annual Report for information regarding executive officers.

The information required by this item with respect to Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.” There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors since our last annual report.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all employees. In compliance with the applicable rules of the SEC, special ethics obligations of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and other employees who perform financial or accounting functions are set forth in Section 10 of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, entitled “Special Ethics Obligations of Employees with Financial Reporting Obligations.” The Code is available at the Investor Information/Governance section of our website atwww.hosthotels.com. A copy of the Code is available in print, free of charge, to stockholders and unitholders upon request to the company at the address set forth in Item 1 of this Annual Report under the section “Business —Where“Business—Where to Find Additional Information.” We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding an amendment to or waiver from a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our web site.

 

Item  11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Officer Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” “Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Compensation Policy Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Report of the Compensation Policy Committee on Executive Compensation.”

 

Item  12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder and Unitholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Officer Compensation—Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

 

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters – Matters—Independence of Directors.”

 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Auditor Fees.”

PART IV

 


PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

(i)FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

All financial statements of the registrants are set forth under Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K.

(ii)FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following financial information is filed herewith on the pages indicated.

Financial Schedules:

 

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(b) EXHIBITS

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the company, its subsidiaries or other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.


 

Exhibit
No.

Description

Exhibit
No.

Description

3.

3.

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Articles of Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-170934), filed on December 2, 2010).

3.1A

Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 1, 2007).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., effective November 6, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 12, 2008).

Exhibit
No.

Description

3.3

Articles Supplementary of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on March 27, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2014).

4.

4.

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders

4.1

See Exhibit 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Articles and Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. defining the rights of security holders. See Exhibit 3.1A for provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. defining the rights of security holders.

4.2

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Host Marriott Corporation’s Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-55807) filed on October 2, 1998).

4.3

Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 5, 1998, by and among HMH Properties, Inc., as Issuer, and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 1998) (SEC File No. 001-05664).

4.4

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among HMH Properties Inc., Host Marriott, L.P., the entities identified therein as New Subsidiary Guarantors and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1998, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein, Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 1998) (SEC File No. 333-55807).

4.5Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2004, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors signatories thereto, and The Bank of New York, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2004, filed on May 3, 2004).
4.6Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2004, among Host Marriott Corporation, Host Marriott, L.P. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. as representatives of the several Initial Purchasers named therein related to the 3.25% Exchangeable debentures due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-117229) filed with the Commission on July 8, 2004).
4.7Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 10, 2005, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 15, 2005).
4.8Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 4, 2006, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 10, 2006).
4.9Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 2, 2006, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 7, 2006).

Exhibit
No.

Description

4.5

4.10

Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated March 23, 2007, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 29, 2007).
4.11Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 23, 2007, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as representatives of the several Initial Purchasers named therein, related to the 2.625% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2007).
4.12Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 11, 2009).
4.13

Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 22, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009).

4.14

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 2009, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., in their capacity as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, related to the 2.50% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2009).

4.15

4.7

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 25, 2010, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 29, 2010).

4.16

4.8

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2011).

4.17

4.9

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.18

4.10

Registration Rights Agreement,

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011,March 22, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, in their capacityThe Bank of New York Mellon,  as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, relatedtrustee, to the 6% Senior Debentures due 2021Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’sthe combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011)March 23, 2012).

Exhibit
No.

Description

4.11

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 9, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on August 9, 2012).

10.

Material Contracts

4.12

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 28, 2013).

10.1

10.

Material Contracts

10.1

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 20082014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2610.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2013, filed on February 27, 2009)25, 2014).

10.2

Trust Agreement between T. Rowe PriceWilmington Trust Company and Host Marriott,Hotels & Resorts, L.P., dated November 23, 2005,June 1, 2006, relating to the Host Marriott,Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3810.2 of Host Marriott Corporation’sHotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,2013, filed March 10, 2006.)on February 25, 2014).  

10.3

Host Marriott Corporation and Host Marriott, L.P. 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended and restated December 29, 1998, as amended January 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 2, 2004).

10.4

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Retirement and Savings Plan, as amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 27, 2009).
10.5Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Non-Employee Director’s Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective as of December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 1, 2010).
10.6

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Severance Plan for Executives, as amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2008, as further amended effective February 2, 2012December 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Current Annual Report on Form 8-K,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 8, 2012)25, 2014).

10.7*

10.5

Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

10.8Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for 2009 for use under the 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3310.7 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, filed on February 27, 2009)22, 2012).

10.9

10.6

Form of Option Agreement for

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 under the 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 ofAppendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 10-K forSchedule 14A filed with the year ended DecemberCommission on March 31, 2008, filed February 27, 2009).

10.10

10.7

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.11

10.8

Form of Option Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.12

10.9

Amended and Restated Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on February 25, 2008).

Exhibit
No.

Description

10.10#

10.13

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009).
10.14#Fourth

Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of June 27, 2011,6, 2014, by and among HHR Euro II GP B.V., HST GP EUROLP Euro B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., filed on July 25, 2011).

10.15Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 21, 2011 between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Quarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q, filed with the Commission on April 21, 2011)August 1, 2014).

10.16

10.11

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2011,June 27, 2014, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch andSecurities, Inc., The Bank of  Nova Scotia , Bank of New York Mellon, Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as co-documentationdocumentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 29, 2011)July 2, 2014).


Exhibit
No.

Description

10.17

10.12

Letter Agreement dated

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 26,December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012 and February 6, 2014 (incorporated by and betweenreference to Exhibit 10.14 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Mr. James Risoleo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.’s Current Annual Report on Form 8-K,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed January 26, 2012)on February 25, 2014).

10.18

12.

Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated August 19, 2010, between Host Hotels and Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2010).
12.

Statements re Computation of Ratios

12.1*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

12.2*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

21.

Subsidiaries

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

21.2*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

23.

Consents

23*

Consent of KPMG LLP

31.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit
    No. 

Description

31.2*

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.4*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

32.2*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

101.INS

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2010,2013, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iv) the CondensedConsolidated Statements of Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v)(vi) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.; (vi) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii) the Consolidated Statements of Capital and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii)(ix) the CondensedConsolidated Statements of Capital for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (x) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014,


2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; and (ix)(xi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged. Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

 

*

Filed herewith.

#

Confidential treatment requested.

This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

Date: February 22, 201224, 2015

By:

/s/ LARRY K. HARVEY        GREGORY J. LARSON

Larry K. Harvey

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signatures

Title

Date

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Richard E. Marriott

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 22, 201224, 2015

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ W. EDWARD WALTER

W. Edward Walter

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

W. Edward Walter

/s/ LARRY K. HARVEY        

Larry K. HarveyGREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Brian G. Macnamara

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ ROBERT M. BAYLIS        

Robert M. BaylisMARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 22, 201224, 2015

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ WILLARD W. BRITTAIN        

Willard W. BrittainSHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 22, 201224, 2015

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 24, 2015

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 24, 2015

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 24, 2015

John B. Morse, Jr.

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 24, 2015

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 24, 2015

Gordon H. Smith

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, LP

Date: February 22, 201224, 2015

By:

By:

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., its general partner

By:

/s/ LARRY K. HARVEY        GREGORY J. LARSON

Larry K. Harvey

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the general partner of the registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Richard E. Marriott

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 22, 201224, 2015

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ W. EDWARD WALTER

W. Edward Walter

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

W. Edward Walter

/s/ LARRY K. HARVEY        

Larry K. HarveyGREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Brian G. Macnamara

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 22, 201224, 2015

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ ROBERT M. BAYLIS        

Robert M. BaylisMARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 22, 201224, 2015

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ WILLARD W. BRITTAIN        

Willard W. BrittainSHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 22, 201224, 2015

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 24, 2015

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 24, 2015

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 24, 2015

John B. Morse, Jr.

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 24, 2015

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 24, 2015

Gordon H. Smith

DirectorFebruary 22, 2012

SCHEDULE III

 

141


SCHEDULE III

Page 1 of 65

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2014

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 Debt  Initial Costs Subsequent
Costs
Capitalized
  Gross Amount at December 31, 2011 Date of
Completion  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Depreciation
Life
 

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 

Hotels:

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arlington Pentagon City Residence Inn

 $—     $6   $29   $6   $6   $35   $41   $15    —      1996    40  

Atlanta Marriott Marquis

  —      13    184    159    16    340    356    103    —      1998    40  

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

  —      —      7    38    15    30    45    19    —      1976    40  

 

$

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

35

 

 

 

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

42

 

 

$

57

 

 

$

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1976

 

 

 

40

 

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown

  —      —      26    8    —      34    34    14    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Axiom Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

33

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

  —      —      203    53    —      256    256    75    —      2002    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

Calgary Marriott

  —      5    18    14    5    32    37    17    —      1996    40  

Chicago Downtown Courtyard River North

  —      7    27    12    7    39    46    19    —      1992    40  

Chicago Marriott O’Hare

  —      4    26    39    4    65    69    41    —      1998    40  

Calgary Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

  —      2    14    5    2    19    21    9    —      1989    40  

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O’Hare

  —      5    36    8    5    44    49    16    —      1997    40  

Coronado Island Marriott Resort

  —      —      53    26    —      79    79    32    —      1997    40  

Chicago Marriott Suites O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Costa Mesa Marriott

  —      3    18    6    3    24    27    11    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Courtyard Nashua

  —      3    14    6    3    20    23    12    —      1989    40  

Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum by the Galleria

  —      14    27    18    14    45    59    23    —      1994    40  

Dayton Marriott

  —      2    30    8    2    38    40    14    —      1998    40  

Delta Meadowvale Resort & Conference Center

  —      4    20    19    4    39    43    21    —      1996    40  

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/River North

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

1992

 

 

 

40

 

Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

  —      6    26    27    6    53    59    24    —      1994    40  

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott West

  —      —      12    10    —      22    22    14    —      1983    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1983

 

 

 

40

 

Embassy Suites Chicago –Downtown/Lakefront

  —      —      86    6    —      92    92    19    —      2004    40  

Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta

  —      5    48    18    6    65    71    24    —      1998    40  

Embassy Suites Chicago-Downtown/Lakefront

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Four Seasons Hotel Philadelphia

  —      26    60    20    27    79    106    31    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

  —      7    22    8    7    30    37    14    —      1993    40  

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

40

 

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

  —      8    88    21    8    109    117    39    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Greensboro-Highpoint Marriott Airport

  —      —      19    8    —      27    27    14    —      1983    40  

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

415

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

33

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

  134    —      62    99    —      161    161    71    —      1997    40  

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Hartford Marriott Rocky Hill

  —      —      17    —      —      17    17    12    —      1991    40  

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf

  84    —      136    (7  —      129    129    4    —      2011    31  

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

(37

)

 

 

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

31

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

  —      2    10    15    2    25    27    13    —      1986    40  

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Airport Marriott

  —      —      10    38    —      48    48    39    —      1984    40  

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center

  —      —      19    17    —      36    36    19��   —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

S-1


SCHEDULE III

Page 2 of 65

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2014

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 Debt  Initial Costs Subsequent
Costs
Capitalized
  Gross Amount at December 31, 2011 Date of
Completion  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Depreciation
Life
 

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge

  —      18    84    4    19    87    106    37    —      1998    40  

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa on Kaanapali Beach

  —      92    212    30    92    242    334    56    —      2003    40  

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

34

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

259

 

 

 

340

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

  —      11    78    18    12    95    107    34    —      1998    40  

 

 

100

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency San Francisco, Burlingame

  —      16    119    49    20    164    184    58    —      1998    40  

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

  —      40    230    21    40    251    291    43    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

  —      13    143    117    14    259    273    99    —      1997    40  

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

281

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Hotel Buckhead Atlanta

  —      16    21    23    16    44    60    24    —      1990    40  

JW Marriott Hotel Houston

  —      4    26    22    6    46    52    26    —      1994    40  

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

8

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Mexico City

  —      11    35    7    10    43    53    31    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Rio de Janeiro

  —      13    29    (4  12    26    38    1    —      2010    40  

JW Marriott Washington, DC

  114    26    98    42    26    140    166    52    —      2003    40  

JW Marriott, Washington D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Kansas City Airport Marriott

  —      —      8    24    —      32    32    26    —      1993    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

40

 

Key Bridge Marriott

  —      —      38    31    —      69    69    56    —      1997    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego

  —      —      548    —      —      548    548    14    —      2011    35  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

585

 

 

 

585

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

35

 

Manhattan Beach Marriott

  —      7    29    14    —      50    50    24    —      1997    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Marina del Rey Marriott

  —      —      13    23    —      36    36    17    —      1995    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Marriott at Metro Center

  —      20    24    19    20    43    63    21    —      1994    40  

Memphis Marriott Downtown

  —      —      16    35    —      51    51    22    —      1998    40  

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

484

 

 

 

484

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay

  —      —      27    29    —      56    56    26    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center

  —      —      27    39    —      66    66    42    —      1986    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

New Orleans Marriott

  —      16    96    109    16    205    221    96    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

New York Helmsley Hotel

  —      155    152    —      155    152    307    4    —      2011    34  

New York Marriott Downtown

  —      19    79    39    19    118    137    52    —      1997    40  

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

New York Marriott Marquis Times Square

  —      —      552    152    —      704    704    436    —      1986    40  

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

552

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

790

 

 

 

518

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

New Zealand Hotel Portfolio

 

 

82

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

35

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott

  —      —      30    4    —      34    34 ��  23    —      1984    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

  —      6    14    8    6    22    28    10    —      1975    40  

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

1975

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

  104    11    13    112    11    125    136    65    —      1975    40  

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

1975

 

 

 

40

 

New Zealand Hotel Portfolio

  81    16    123    (18  16    105    121    3    —      2011    35  

Orlando World Center Marriott Resort & Convention Center

  246    18    157    322    29    468    497    165    —      1997    40  

Park Ridge Marriott

  —      —      20    10    —      30    30    12    —      1987    40  

Philadelphia Airport Marriott

  —      —      42    8    —      50    50    21    —      1995    40  

Philadelphia Marriott Downtown

  —      3    144    104    11    240    251    87    —      1995    40  

Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront

  —      6    40    20    6    60    66    29    —      1994    40  

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

368

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

514

 

 

 

543

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

S-2


SCHEDULE III

Page 3 of 65

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2014

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 Debt  Initial Costs Subsequent
Costs
Capitalized
  Gross Amount at December 31, 2011 Date of
Completion  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Depreciation
Life
 

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 

Park Ridge Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

 

40

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Rio de Janeiro Parque Olympico Hotels

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter

  —      —      86    79    —      165    165    63    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk

  —      —      45    17    —      62    62    27    —      1995    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

San Cristobal Tower, Santiago

  —      7    15    1    7    16    23    2    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

5

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina

  —      —      202    253    —      455    455    156    —      1996    40  

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

  —      4    23    10    4    33    37    15    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Airport Marriott

  —      11    48    37    12    84    96    41    —      1994    40  

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

  —      6    20    20    6    40    46    20    —      1994    40  

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Marriott Marquis

  —      —      278    91    —      369    369    188    —      1989    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

389

 

 

 

389

 

 

 

234

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

San Ramon Marriott

  —      —      22    17    —      39    39    16    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Santa Clara Marriott

  —      —      39    54    —      93    93    67    —      1989    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

  —      8    48    3    8    51    59    10    —      2004    40  

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

  —      3    20    9    3    29    32    11    —      1988    40  

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

 

40

 

Seattle Airport Marriott

  —      3    42    18    3    60    63    32    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

  —      42    262    45    42    307    349    48    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

371

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing

  —      3    51    9    3    60    63    9    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Memphis Downtown Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Needham Hotel

  —      5    27    5    5    32    37    5    —      1986    40  

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton New York Hotel & Towers

  —      346    409    120    346    529    875    79    —      2006    40  

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

603

 

 

 

949

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

  —      8    30    8    8    38    46    7    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina

  —      —      328    24    —      352    352    53    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center

  —      19    11    (1  19    10    29    2    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

St. Regis Hotel, Houston

  —      6    33    15    6    48    54    9    —      2006    40  

Swissôtel Chicago

  —      29    132    77    30    208    238    59    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

244

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Tampa Airport Marriott

  —      —      9    20    —      29    29    22    —      2000    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

 

40

 

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

  —      —      —      106    11    95    106    31    2000    —      40  

The Fairmont Kea Lani Maui

  —      55    294    20    55    314    369    63    —      2003    40  

The Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

402

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

  —      25    115    58    25    173    198    60    —      1998    40  

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

  —      14    81    58    15    138    153    59    —      1996    40  

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey

  —      —      52    24    —      76    76    36    —      1997    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

  208    19    126    97    21    221    242    105    —      1996    40  

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort

  —      6    —      92    22    76    98    18    2002    —      40  

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

  —      10    63    7    10    70    80    27    —      1998    40  

The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco

  —      31    123    23    31    146    177    54    —      1998    40  

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner

  —      —      89    15    —      104    104    40    —      1998    40  

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

  —      5    84    21    6    104    110    37    —      1998    40  

The Westin Chicago River North

  —      33    116    1    33    117    150    4    —      2010    40  

S-3


SCHEDULE III

Page 4 of 65

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2014

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 Debt  Initial Costs Subsequent
Costs
Capitalized
  Gross Amount at December 31, 2011 Date of
Completion  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Depreciation
Life
 

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Land Buildings &
Improvements
 Total Accumulated
Depreciation
 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Cincinnati

  —      —      54    11    —      65    65    12    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

  35    —      89    8    —      97    97    15    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

  —      16    80    11    16    91    107    16    —      2006    40  

The Westin Georgetown, Washington D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Indianapolis

  —      12    100    7    12    107    119    17    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

  —      100    280    16    100    296    396    40    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

280

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

402

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Los Angeles Airport

  —      —      102    14    —      116    116    19    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

  —      40    47    12    38    61    99    12    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

(41

)

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

385

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Seattle

  —      39    175    3    39    178    217    26    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin South Coast Plaza

  —      —      46    9    —      55    55    18    —      2006    40  

The Westin South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Waltham-Boston

  —      9    59    8    9    67    76    12    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Toronto Marriott Airport

  —      5    24    15    5    39    44    19    —      1996    40  

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre

  —      —      27    17    —      44    44    20    —      1995    40  

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

W New York

  —      138    102    37    138    139    277    27    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

W New York – Union Square

  —      48    145    —      48    145    193    5    —      2010    40  

W New York - Union Square

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

201

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

W Seattle

  —      11    125    1    11    126    137    18    —      2006    40  

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott

  —      —      3    36    —      39    39    30    —      1970    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

1970

 

 

 

40

 

Washington Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

  —      7    32    15    7    47    54    22    —      1994    40  

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

YVE Hotel Miami

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

33

 

Total hotels:

  1,006    1,782    9,427    3,791    1,852    13,148    15,000    4,293     

 

 

403

 

 

 

2,019

 

 

 

9,185

 

 

 

4,171

 

 

 

(70

)

 

 

1,986

 

 

 

13,319

 

 

 

15,305

 

 

 

5,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other properties, each less than 5% of total

  —      —      4    16    —      20    20    13    —      various    40  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

various

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

TOTAL

 $1,006   $1,782   $9,431   $3,807   $1,852   $13,168   $15,020   $4,306     

 

$

403

 

 

$

2,019

 

 

$

9,189

 

 

$

4,188

 

 

$

(70

)

 

$

1,990

 

 

$

13,336

 

 

$

15,326

 

 

$

5,376

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

S-4


SCHEDULE III

Page 5 of 6

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 20112014

(in millions)

Notes:

(A)

The change in total cost of properties for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 is as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $13,115  

Additions:

  

Acquisitions

   2  

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

   326  

Deductions:

  

Dispositions and other

   (265

Impairments

   (94

Assets held for sale

   (8
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   13,076  

Additions:

  

Acquisitions

   532  

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

   161  

Deductions:

  

Dispositions and other

   (20
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   13,749  

Additions:

  

Acquisitions

   1,155  

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

   338  

Deductions:

  

Dispositions and other

   (214

Impairments

   (8
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $15,020  
  

 

 

 

SCHEDULE III

Page 6 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2011

(in millions)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

15,020

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

427

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

443

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(172

)

Impairments

 

 

(57

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

 

15,661

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

184

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

353

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(789

)

Impairments

 

 

(1

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

 

15,408

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

137

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

288

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(501

)

Impairments

 

 

(6

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

15,326

 

(B)

The change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 is as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $3,075  

Depreciation and amortization

   451  

Dispositions and other

   (121

Depreciation on assets held for sale

   (1
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   3,404  

Depreciation and amortization

   450  

Dispositions and other

   (20
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   3,834  

Depreciation and amortization

   496  

Dispositions and other

   (24
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $4,306  
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

4,306

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

537

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(75

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

 

4,768

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

550

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(270

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

 

5,048

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

547

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(219

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

5,376

 

(C)

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10,570$10,390 million at December 31, 2011.2014.

(D)

The total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties.

Exhibit Index

 


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

3.

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Articles of Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-170934), filed on December 2, 2010).

3.1A

Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 1, 2007).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., effective November 6, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 12, 2008).

4.

3.3

Articles Supplementary of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on March 27, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2014).

4.

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders

4.1

See Exhibit 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Articles and Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. defining the rights of security holders. See Exhibit 3.1A for provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. defining the rights of security holders.

4.2

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Host Marriott Corporation’s Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-55807) filed on October 2, 1998).

4.3

Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 5, 1998, by and among HMH Properties, Inc., as Issuer, and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 1998) (SEC File No. 001-05664).

4.4

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among HMH Properties Inc., Host Marriott, L.P., the entities identified therein as New Subsidiary Guarantors and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1998, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein, Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 1998) (SEC File No. 333-55807).

4.5Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2004, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors signatories thereto, and The Bank of New York, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2004, filed on May 3, 2004).
4.6Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2004, among Host Marriott Corporation, Host Marriott, L.P. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. as representatives of the several Initial Purchasers named therein related to the 3.25% Exchangeable debentures due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-117229) filed with the Commission on July 8, 2004).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.5

4.7

Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 10, 2005, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 15, 2005).
4.8Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 4, 2006, by and among Host Marriott, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 10, 2006).
4.9Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 2, 2006, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 7, 2006).
4.10Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated March 23, 2007, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 29, 2007).
4.11Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 23, 2007, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as representatives of the several Initial Purchasers named therein, related to the 2.625% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2007).
4.12Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 11, 2009).
4.13

Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 22, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009).

4.14

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 2009, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., in their capacity as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, related to the 2.50% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2009).


Exhibit
No.

Description

4.7

4.15

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 25, 2010, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 29, 2010).


EXHIBIT INDEX

4.16

Exhibit
No.

Description

4.8

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2011).

4.17

4.9

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011).

4.18

4.10

Registration Rights Agreement,

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011,March 22, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, in their capacityThe Bank of New York Mellon, as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, relatedtrustee, to the 6% Senior Debentures due 2021Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’sthe combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011)March 23, 2012).

10.

4.11

Material Contracts

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 9, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on August 9, 2012).

10.1

4.12

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 28, 2013).

10.

Material Contracts

10.1

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 20082014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2610.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2013, filed on February 27, 2009)25, 2014).

10.2

Trust Agreement between T. Rowe PriceWilmington Trust Company and Host Marriott,Hotels & Resorts, L.P., dated November 23, 2005,June 1, 2006, relating to the Host Marriott,Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3810.2 of Host Marriott Corporation’sHotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,2013, filed March 10, 2006.)on February 25, 2014).  

10.3

Host Marriott Corporation and Host Marriott, L.P. 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended and restated December 29, 1998, as amended January 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 2, 2004).

10.4

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Retirement and Savings Plan, as amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 27, 2009).
10.5Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Non-Employee Director’s Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective as of December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 1, 2010).
10.6

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Severance Plan for Executives, as amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2008, as further amended effective February 2, 2012December 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Current Annual Report on Form 8-K,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 8, 2012)25, 2014).


Exhibit
No.

Description

10.5

10.7*

Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

10.8Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for 2009 for use under the 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3310.7 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, filed on February 27, 2009)22, 2012).

10.9

10.6

Form of Option Agreement for

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 under the 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 ofAppendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 10-K forSchedule 14A filed with the year ended DecemberCommission on March 31, 2008, filed February 27, 2009).

10.10

10.7

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).


EXHIBIT INDEX

10.11

Exhibit
No.

Description

10.8

Form of Option Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.12

10.9

Amended and Restated Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on February 25, 2008).

10.13

10.10#

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009).
10.14#Fourth

Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of June 27, 2011,6, 2014, by and among HHR Euro II GP B.V., HST GP EUROLP Euro B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., filed on July 25, 2011).

10.15Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 21, 2011 between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Quarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q, filed with the Commission on April 21, 2011)August 1, 2014).

10.16

10.11

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2011,June 27, 2014, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch andSecurities, Inc., The Bank of  Nova Scotia , Bank of New York Mellon, Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as co-documentationdocumentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 29, 2011)July 2, 2014).

10.17

10.12

Letter Agreement dated

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 26,December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012 and February 6, 2014 (incorporated by and betweenreference to Exhibit 10.14 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Mr. James Risoleo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.’s Current Annual Report on Form 8-K,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed January 26, 2012).

10.18Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated August 19, 2010, between Host Hotels and Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2010)February 25, 2014).


Exhibit

    No. 

Description

12.

12.

Statements re Computation of Ratios

12.1*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

12.2*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

21.

Subsidiaries

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

21.2*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

23.

Consents

23*

Consent of KPMG LLP

31.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.4*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†


EXHIBIT INDEX

32.2*

Exhibit
No.

Description

32.2*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

101.INS

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.


Exhibit
No.

Description

101.PRE

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts Inc.; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income(Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts Inc.; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts Inc.; (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.; (vi) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Statements of Capital and Comprehensive Income(Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.; (viii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts L.P.; and (ix) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged. Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (ix) the Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (x) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; and (xi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

 

*

Filed herewith.

#

Confidential treatment requested.

This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.