UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014                                                  Commission file number 1-10585

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011Commission file number
1-10585              

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

             

 

Delaware

 

13-4996950

Delaware13-4996950

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

469 North Harrison Street, Princeton,500 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, N.J. 0854308628

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(609) 683-5900806-1200

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange

on which registered

Common Stock, $1 par value

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  xT    No  ¨£

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨£    No  xT

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  xT    No  ¨£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  xT    No  ¨£

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ..    Yes10-K. ¨    No  x£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  x            Accelerated filer  ¨             Non-accelerated filer  ¨            Smaller reporting company  ¨

Large accelerated filer

T

Accelerated filer

£

Non-accelerated filer

£

Smaller reporting company

£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨£    No  xT

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of July 1, 2011June 30, 2014 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $5.9$9.3 billion.  For purposes of making this calculation only, the registrant included all directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of the Common Stockcommon stock (the “Common Stock”) of the Company as affiliates.Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (the “Company”).  The aggregate market value is based on the closing price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2011.June 30, 2014.

As of February 20, 2012,18, 2015, there were 142,396,743130,566,502 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Certain provisions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 29, 201230, 2015 are incorporated by reference in Items 10 through 14 of ItemPart III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K (this “Annual Report”).  

 

 

 


CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, including, among others, statements relating to sales and earnings growth; the effect of product mix; volume growth, including the effects of new product launches into new and existing categories; the impact of unit dose laundry detergent; impairments and other charges; consumer demand and spending; the effects of competition; earnings per share,share; gross margin changes,changes; trade and marketing spending,spending; marketing expense as a percentage of net sales; cost savings programs; the Company’s hedge programs,programs; the impact of foreign exchange and commodity fluctuations,price fluctuations; the Company’s share repurchase programs; the impact of acquisitions; capital expenditures; the effective tax rate,rate; the impact of tax audits,audits; tax changes and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations, facility restructuring charges,limitations; the impact of trade name impairment charges; environmental matters,and regulatory matters; availability of raw materials; the effect of the credit environment on the Company’s liquidity and capital expenditures,expenditures; the Company’s fixed rate debt; compliance with covenants under the Company’s Credit Agreement and other debt instruments; the Company’s commercial paper program,program; sufficiency of cash flows from operations,operations; the Company’s current and anticipated future borrowing capacity to meet capital expenditure program costs,costs; payment of dividendsdividends; actual voluntary and expected purchases under the Company’s share repurchase authorization, impact of the change in the quarterly financial reporting calendar, expected cash contributions to pension plans,plans; investments in the Natronx TechnologyTechnologies, LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture, divestitures, completionventure; and adequacy of the Company’s new corporate office building and vacating of the three leased facilities adjacent to the Princeton headquarters, transition costs relating to the construction of a West Coast manufacturing and distribution facility and transition of operations at the Company’s Green River, Wyoming facility and ability to expand West Coast facility.raw materials, including trona reserves. These statements represent the intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs of the Company, and are based on assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable but may prove to be incorrect.  In addition, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control and could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Important factorsFactors that couldmight cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statementssuch differences include a decline in market growth, retailer distribution and consumer demand (including the effect(as a result of, among other things, political, economic and marketplace conditions and events on consumer demand)events); unanticipated increases in raw material and energy prices; adverse developments affecting the financial condition of major customers and suppliers; competition;competition, including The Procter & Gamble Company’s participation in the value laundry detergent category; changes in marketing and promotional spending; growth or declines in various product categories and the impact of trade customer actions in response to changes in consumer demand and the economy, including increasing shelf space of private label products; consumer and competitor reaction to, and customer acceptance of, new product introductions and features; disruptions in the banking system and financial marketsmarkets; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; the impact of natural disasters on the Company and its customers and suppliers, including third party information technology service providers; the acquisition or divestiture of assets; the outcome of contingencies, including litigation, pending regulatory proceedings and environmental remediation.matters; and changes in the regulatory environment.

For a description of additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements, please see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise, except as required by the United States federal securities laws. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we makethe Company makes on related subjects in ourits filings with the U.S.United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Commission (the “Commission”).

2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

PART II

PART III

 

Item

    Page 
PART I  

1.

 Business   1  

1A.

 Risk Factors   14  

1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments   22  

2.

 Properties   22  

3.

 Legal Proceedings   24  

4.

 Mine Safety Disclosures   26  
PART II  

5.

 

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   27  

6.

 Selected Financial Data   29  

7.

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   30  

7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   49  

8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   50  

9.

 Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   96  

9A.

 Controls and Procedures   96  

9B.

 Other Information   96  
PART III  

10.

 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance   97  

11.

 Executive Compensation   97  

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   97  

13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence   97  

14.

 Principal Accounting Fees and Services   97  
PART IV  

15.

 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules   98  



PART I

 

ITEMITEM 1.

BUSINESS

GENERAL

The Company, founded in 1846, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of household, personal care and specialty products. The Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brands through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company also sells specialty products to industrial customers and distributors.

The Company focuses its consumer products marketing efforts principally on its eightnine “power brands.” These well-recognized brand names include ARM & HAMMER (used in multiple product categories such as baking soda, cat litter, carpet deodorization and laundry detergent), TROJAN Condoms, XTRAcondoms, lubricants and vibrators, OXICLEAN stain removers, cleaning solutions, laundry detergents, dishwashing detergent OXICLEAN pre-wash laundry additive, NAIR depilatories,and bleach alternatives, SPINBRUSH battery-operated and manual toothbrushes, FIRST RESPONSE home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, NAIR depilatories, ORAJEL oral analgesics and SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes. XTRA laundry detergent. The ninth “power brand” is the combination of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION brand names for the Company’s gummy dietary supplement business. The Company considers four of these brands to be “mega brands”: ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION, and is giving greatest focus to the growth of these brands.

The Company’s business is divided into three primary segments,segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products.Products Division (“SPD”). The Consumer Domestic segment includes the eight power brands andnoted previously as well as other household and personal care products such as SCRUB FREE, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products, ANSWER home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, ARRID antiperspirant and CLOSE-UP and AIM toothpastes.toothpastes and SIMPLY SALINE nasal saline moisturizer. The Consumer International segment primarily sells a variety of personal care products, some of which use the same brands as ourthe Company’s domestic product lines, in international markets, including Canada, France, Australia, the United Kingdom, Mexico Brazil and China.Brazil. The Specialty ProductsSPD segment is the largest United States (“U.S.”) producer of sodium bicarbonate, which it sells together with other specialty inorganic chemicals for a variety of industrial, institutional, medical and food applications. This segment also sells a range of animal nutrition and specialty cleaning products. In 2011,2014, the Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty ProductsSPD segments represented approximately 72%75%, 19%16% and 9%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales.

All domestic brand “rankings” contained in this reportAnnual Report are based on dollar share rankings from AC Nielsen Food, Drug, Mass (“FDM”) excluding Wal-MartACNielsen AOC (All Outlets Combined) for the 52 weeks endingended December 24, 2011.21, 2014.  Foreign brand “rankings” are derived from several sources.

2011 DEVELOPMENTS

New Manufacturing Facility

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company announced its decision to relocate a portion of its Green River, Wyoming operations to a newly leased site in Victorville, California in the first half of 2012. Specifically, the Company will be relocating its cat litter manufacturing operations and distribution center to this southern California site to be closer to transportation hubs and its West Coast customers. The site will also produce liquid laundry detergent products and is expandable to meet business needs for the foreseeable future. The Company’s sodium bicarbonate operations and other consumer product manufacturing will remain at the Green River facility.

Two-for-one stock split

On June 1, 2011, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s Common Stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend. All applicable amounts in the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

BATISTE Acquisition

On June 28, 2011, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo brand from Vivalis, Limited (“BATISTE Acquisition”) for cash consideration of $64.8 million. The Company paid for the acquisition from available cash. BATISTE annual sales are approximately $20.0 million. The BATISTE brand is managed principally within the Consumer International segment.

New Corporate Office Building

On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a 20 year lease for a new corporate headquarters building that will be constructed in Ewing, New Jersey (approximately 10 miles from the Company’s existing corporate headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey) to meet office space needs for the foreseeable future. Based on current expectations that the facility will be completed and occupied beginning in early 2013, the lease will expire in 2033. The Company’s lease commitment is approximately $116 million over the lease term. In conjunction with its lease of the new headquarters building, the Company will be vacating three leased facilities adjacent to its current Princeton headquarters facility.

Share Repurchase Authorization

On August 4, 2011, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s Common Stock. Any purchases may be made from time to time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, subject to market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. There is no expiration date on the stock repurchase authorization, and the Company is not obligated to acquire any specific number of shares. The Company purchased 1.8 million shares at a cost of $80.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

New Joint Venture

On September 22, 2011, the Company, together with FMC Corporation and TATA Chemicals, formed an operating joint venture, Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”). The Company has a one-third ownership interest in Natronx, and its investment is accounted for under the equity method. The joint venture will engage in the manufacturing and marketing of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. The sorbents, primarily sodium bicarbonate and trona, are used by coal-fired utilities to remove harmful pollutants, such as acid gases, in flue-gas treatment processes. Natronx intends to invest approximately $60 million to construct a 450,000 ton per year facility in Wyoming to produce trona sorbents by the fourth quarter of 2012, the cost of which will be equally shared among all members. The joint venture started business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the Company made an initial investment of approximately $3 million and is committed to investing upwards of an additional $17 million in 2012.

Commercial Paper Notes

In the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with two banks to establish a commercial paper program (the “Program”). Under the Program, the Company may issue notes from time to time up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any given time of $500 million. The maturities of the notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days. The notes will be sold under customary terms in the commercial paper market and will be issued at a discount to par or, alternatively, will be sold at par and will bear varying interest rates based on a fixed or floating rate basis. The interest rates will vary based on market conditions and the ratings assigned to the notes by the credit rating agencies at the time of issuance. Subject to market conditions, the Company intends to utilize the Program as its primary short-term borrowing facility and does not intend to sell unsecured commercial paper notes in excess of the available amount under the revolving credit agreement. If, for any reason, the Company is unable to access the commercial paper market, the revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) would be utilized to meet the Company’s short-term liquidity needs. The Company recently amended its Credit Agreement to support the Program. Total combined borrowing for both the Credit Agreement and the Program may not exceed $500 million. Additionally the Credit Agreement was also extended through August 4, 2016. The Company did not issue any notes in 2011. As a result of this Program, the Company terminated its accounts receivable securitization facility as the Program has a lower interest rate than the securitization facility.

Information Systems Upgrade

The Company recently upgraded its U.S. and Canadian information systems and plans to do so for certain foreign subsidiaries currently scheduled during 2012. The Company estimated a sales increase in the fourth quarter of approximately $9.0 million due to orders from customers in advance of the U.S. implementation.

Brazil’s Chemical Business

The Company is exploring strategic options for its chemical business in Brazil. The business, which has annual revenues of approximately $40 million, markets sodium bicarbonate, dairy products and other chemicals in Brazil. The net assets associated with a portion of this business have been classified as “held for sale” for financial statement reporting purposes as of December 31, 2011.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS

As noted above, the Company’s business is organized into three reportable segments,segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products (“SPD”).SPD.  These segments are based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership structures.  The businesses of these segments generally are not seasonal, although the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments are affected by sales of SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes which(which typically are higher during the fall, in advance of the holiday season, andseason), sales of NAIR depilatories and waxes which(which typically are higher in the spring and summer months.months), and sales of VITAFUSION and L’IL CRITTERS dietary supplements (which typically are slightly higher in the fourth quarter of each year, in advance of the cold and flu season and renewed commitments to health).  Information concerning the net sales, operating income and identifiable assets of each of the segments is set forth in Note 1917 to the consolidated financial statements included in this reportAnnual Report and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is Item 7 of this report.Annual Report.  

CONSUMER PRODUCTS

Consumer Domestic

Principal Products

The Company’s founders first marketed baking soda in 1846 for use in home baking.  Today, this product has a wide variety of uses in the home, including as a refrigerator and freezer deodorizer, scratch-free cleaner and deodorizer for kitchen surfaces and cooking appliances, bath additive, dentifrice, cat litter deodorizer and swimming pool pH stabilizer.  The Company specializes in baking soda-based products, as well as other products which use the same raw materials or technology or are sold in the same markets.  In addition, this segment includes other deodorizing and household cleaning products, as well as laundry and personal care products.  The following table sets forth the principal products of the Company’s Consumer Domestic segment.


 

Type of Product

Key Brand Names

Household

ARM & HAMMER Pure Baking Soda

ARM & HAMMER and XTRA Powder and Liquid Laundry Detergents

ARM & HAMMER Carpet & Room Deodorizers

ARM & HAMMER Cat Litter Deodorizer

ARM & HAMMER Clumping Cat Litters (including CLUMP & SEAL)

ARM & HAMMER Powder, Liquid and Unit Dose Laundry Detergents

ARM & HAMMER Super Washing Soda

ARM & HAMMER FRESH’N SOFT Fabric Softeners

ARM & HAMMER Total 2-in-1 Dryer Cloths

ARM & HAMMER Super Washing Soda

SCRUB FREE Bathroom Cleaners

CLEAN SHOWER Daily Shower Cleaner

CAMEO Aluminum & Stainless Steel Cleaner

SNO BOL Toilet Bowl Cleaner

XTRA and NICE’N FLUFFY Fabric Softeners

DELICARE Fine Fabric Wash

OXICLEAN Detergent and Cleaning Solution

KABOOM Cleaning Products

ORANGE GLO Cleaning Products

FELINE PINE Cat Litter

KABOOM Cleaning Products

Type of Product

Key Brand NamesNICE’N FLUFFY Fabric Softeners

ORANGE GLO Cleaning Products

OXICLEAN Dishwashing Detergent and Dishwashing Booster

OXICLEAN Laundry and Cleaning Solutions

SCRUB FREE Bathroom Cleaners

XTRA Fabric Softeners

XTRA Powder and Liquid Laundry Detergents

Personal Care

AIM Toothpaste

ANSWER Home Pregnancy and Ovulation Test Kits

ARM & HAMMER ToothpastesDeodorants and Antiperspirants

SPINBRUSH Battery-operated Toothbrushes

MENTADENT Toothpaste, Toothbrushes

AIM Toothpaste

PEPSODENT Toothpaste

CLOSE-UP Toothpaste

RIGIDENT Denture Adhesive

ARM & HAMMER Deodorants & AntiperspirantsTRULY RADIANT Toothpaste and Oral Rinses

ARRID Antiperspirants

LADY’S CHOICE Antiperspirants

TROJAN Condoms and Vibrating Products

CLOSE-UP Toothpaste

FIRST RESPONSE Home Pregnancy and Ovulation Test Kits

ANSWER Home Pregnancy

L’IL CRITTERS Dietary Supplements

MENTADENT Toothpaste and Ovulation Test KitsToothbrushes

NAIR Depilatories, Lotions, Creams and Waxes

ORAJEL Oral Analgesics

PEPSODENT Toothpaste

REPHRESH Feminine Hygiene Product

REPLENS Feminine Hygiene Product

SIMPLY SALINE Nasal Saline Moisturizer

CARTERS LITTLE PILLS Laxative

SPINBRUSH Battery-operated Toothbrushes

TROJAN Condoms, Lubricants and Vibrating Products

VITAFUSION Dietary Supplements

Household Products

In 2011,2014, household products constituted approximately 65%59% of the Company’s Domestic Consumer sales and approximately 47%45% of the Company’s total sales.

The ARM & HAMMER trademark was adopted in 1867.  ARM & HAMMER Baking Soda remains the number one leading brand of baking soda in terms of consumer recognition of the brand name and reputation for quality and value.  The deodorizing properties of baking soda have led to the development of several baking soda-based household products.  For example, the Company markets ARM & HAMMER FRIDGE FRESH, a refrigerator deodorizer equipped with a baking soda filter to help keep food tasting fresher. In addition,fresher, and ARM & HAMMER Carpet and Room Deodorizer is the number one brand in the domestic carpet and room deodorizer market.Deodorizer.    

The Company’s laundry detergents constitute its largest consumer business, measured by net sales. The Company markets its ARM & HAMMER brand laundry detergents in both powder, liquid and liquidunit dose forms as value products, priced at a discount from products identified by the Company as market leaders. The Company markets its XTRA laundry detergent in both powder and liquid forms at a slightly lower price than ARM & HAMMER brand laundry detergents. The Company also markets XTRA LASTING SCENTSATIONS and XTRA FRESCO SCENTSATIONS, a line of highly fragranced and concentrated liquid laundry detergent,detergents, and OXICLEAN pre-wash laundry additive.stain fighting additives   OXICLEAN is the number one brand in the U.S. laundry pre-wash additives market in the U.S.stain fighting additive market. The Company markets ARM & HAMMER Power Gel Laundry Detergent and ARM & HAMMER plusPLUS OXICLEAN liquid and powder laundry detergents, combining the benefits of these two powerful laundry detergent products. In 2011 the Company launched the only scented liquid detergent clinically tested safe for sensitive skin under the ARM & HAMMER name. The Company recently introducedproducts, and ARM & HAMMER CRYSTAL BURST power packs, a new convenient unit dose form of laundry detergent. In 2014, the Company launched ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN Ultra Power liquid detergent, an ultra-concentrated version of


ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN, ARM & HAMMER CLEAN SCENTSATIONS, a line of liquid detergents with fragrances inspired by U.S. National Parks, OXICLEAN laundry detergent, a premium-priced line of liquid, powder and unit dose laundry detergents, OXICLEAN dishwashing detergent, and OXICLEAN WHITE REVIVE additive, a line of bleach alternatives in both powder and unit dose forms. In 2015, the Company is introducing ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN ODOR BLASTERS liquid laundry detergent, ARM & HAMMER CLEAN SCENTSATIONS scent booster, OXICLEAN WHITE REVIVE laundry detergent and liquid additive, OXICLEAN versatile stain remover plus ODOR BLASTERS, and OXICLEAN washing machine cleaner.

The Company’s laundry products also include fabric softener sheets that prevent static cling and soften and freshen clothes. The Company markets ARM & HAMMER FRESH ‘NFRESH’N SOFT liquid fabric softenersofteners and offers anothera liquid fabric softener, NICE’N FLUFFY, at a slightly lower price enabling the Company to compete at several price points.  The Company markets ARM & HAMMER Total 2-in-1 Dryer Cloths, a fabric softener sheet used in the clothes dryer that delivers liquid-like softening, freshening and static control.

The Company also markets a line of cat litter products, including ARM & HAMMER Super ScoopCLUMP & SEAL clumping cat litter, ARM & HAMMER SUPER SCOOP clumping cat litter and ARM & HAMMER ULTRA LAST, a longer lasting clumping cat litter. Line extensions of Super ScoopOther products include ARM & HAMMER Multi-Cat cat litter, designed for households with more than one cat, ARM & HAMMER Odor Alert cat litter, with crystals that change color

when activated, ARM & HAMMER EssentialsESSENTIALS clumping cat litter, a corn-based scoopable litter made for consumers who prefer to use products made fromwith natural ingredients, and ARM & HAMMER Double Duty cat litter, which eliminates both urine and feces odors on contact. The Company markets its FELINE PINE cat litter which was acquired in December 2010, continues to be the number one brand in the natural litter segment, which is the highest growth segment in the litter category. This brand complementscomplementing the Company’s existingARM & HAMMER branded cat litter business and positionspositioning the Company as thea leading supplier of natural cat litter. In 2012,December 2014, the Company launched ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL lightweight cat litter and in 2015, the Company will launch ARM & HAMMER Ultra Last, a longer lasting clumpingCLUMP & SEAL NATURALS cat litter.

In addition, the Company markets a line of household cleaning products including CLEAN SHOWER daily shower cleaner, and SCRUB FREE bathroom cleaners and SNO BOL toilet bowl cleaner.cleaners. The Company also markets KABOOM bathroom cleaner andcleaners, ORANGE GLO household cleaning products. In 2012, the Company will launchproducts and OXICLEAN DishwasherDishwashing Booster, which removes cloudy film and food particles on glasses and dishes. In 2014, the Company introduced KABOOM SHOWER GUARD, a daily shower cleaning product, and extended its OXICLEAN brand by launching its first OXICLEAN automatic dishwasher dishwashing detergent.

Personal Care Products

The Company participates in theCompany’s personal care business usingwas founded on the unique strengths of its ARM & HAMMER trademark and baking soda technology, andtechnology. The Company has expanded its presencepersonal care business through its acquisition of antiperspirants, oral care products, depilatories, reproductive health products, oral analgesics, and nasal saline moisturizers and dietary supplements under a variety of other leading brand names. In 2011,2014, Personal Care Products constituted approximately 35%41% of the Company’s Consumer Domestic sales and approximately 25%30% of the Company’s total sales.

ARM & HAMMER Baking Soda, when used as a dentifrice, whitenshelps whiten and polishespolish teeth, removes plaque and leaves the mouth feeling fresh and clean. These properties led to the development of a complete line of sodium bicarbonate-based dentifrice products whichthat are marketed and sold nationally primarily under the ARM & HAMMER DENTAL CARE and ARM & HAMMER ADVANCE WHITE brand name. In 2012, the Company plans to launchnames, including a line of toothpaste for sensitive teeth under the combined ARM & HAMMER and ORAJEL names.brand.

The Company also manufactures in the United StatesU.S. and markets in the United StatesU.S. (including Puerto Rico) and Canada CLOSE-UP, PEPSODENT and AIM toothpastes, which are priced at a discount from the market leaders, and the MENTADENT brand of toothpaste and toothbrushes.

The In addition, the Company markets ORAJEL oral analgesics, which includes products for adults as well as Baby ORAJEL Cooling Cucumber Teething Gel and Baby ORAJEL Tooth and Gum Cleanser.

The Company markets SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes in the United States (including Puerto Rico), the United Kingdom, Canada, China and Australia. In 2011, the SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrush was the number one brand of battery-operated toothbrushes in the United States. The Company also markets SPINBRUSH Pro-Select toothbrushes, a two speed version of the product, SPINBRUSH Pro-Recharge, a rechargeable toothbrush offering up to one week of power brushes between charges and SPINBRUSH Sonic, a reasonably priced high speed battery-operated toothbrush which competes with much more expensive “sonic” toothbrushes. In 2012, the Company will launch ARM & HAMMER Tooth Tunes battery operated toothbrushes, a toothbrush with proprietary technology which delivers music while brushing.

The Company’s deodorant and antiperspirant products are marketed under the ARM & HAMMER ARRID and LADY’S CHOICEARRID brand names.

Condoms are recognized as highly reliable contraceptives as well as an effective means of reducing the risk of sexually transmitted diseases (“STDs”).diseases. The Company’s TROJAN condom brand is the number one condom brand in the U.S., and has been in use for more than 90 years. In 2011, theThe brand continued its market and innovation leadership in the United States with the new ECSTASY product line and continued success ofincludes such products as ECSTASY, TROJAN EXTENDED PLEASURE, HER PLEASURE, TWISTED PLEASURE, SHARED PLEASURE, MAGNUM WITH WARM SENSATIONS,and FIRE & ICE, TROJAN CHARGED, a

unique condom with a sensate lubricant system which warms the skin on contact for enhanced pleasure, TROJAN Ultra Thin condomsthat has heating, cooling and tingling properties, and TROJAN Fire and Ice Condoms.Vibrations, a line of vibrating products. The Company also markets a seriesline of vibratinglubrication products under the TROJAN name.brand. In 2012,2014, the Company will launchintroduced line extensions into the TROJAN lubricant line, launched two new condoms: TROJAN DOUBLE ECSTASY and TROJAN MAGNUM RIBBED and introduced two new vibrating products under its TROJAN Vibrations Midnight Collection,line. In 2015, the Company is introducing TROJAN STUDDED BARESKIN and MAGNUM BARESKIN condoms and TROJAN TONIGHT and TROJAN H2O lubricants.

The Company markets SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes in the U.S. (including Puerto Rico), the United Kingdom, Canada, France, China and Australia. In 2014, the SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrush was the number one leading brand of battery-operated toothbrushes in the U.S. The Company also markets SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN toothbrushes, a newtwo-speed version of the product, SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN Recharge, a rechargeable toothbrush offering up to one week of power brushes between


charges, SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN Sonic, a value high speed battery-operated toothbrush which competes with much more expensive “sonic” toothbrushes, and ARM & HAMMER TOOTH TUNES battery-operated toothbrushes, with proprietary technology that delivers music while brushing. In 2014, the Company introduced a line of vibrating products.SPINBRUSH TRULY RADIANT toothpastes. In 2015, the Company is introducing a line of ARM & HAMMER SPINBRUSH manual toothbrushes with rotating heads as well as ARM & HAMMER TRULY RADIANT oral rinse.

In 2011, the Company’s FIRST RESPONSE brand continued to be number one in theThe Company markets two lines of home pregnancy and ovulation test kit business category. The Company also marketskits. Its FIRST RESPONSE brand of diagnostic kits is the number one selling brand in the U.S. Its ANSWER which competeshome pregnancy and ovulation test kits compete in the value segment of the homemarket. In 2014, the Company launched an enhanced FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kit that can tell a woman that she is pregnant up to six days before her expected period, with 99% accuracy from the day of her missed period. In 2015, the Company will launch a new stick design for its FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kit and an ovulation test and confirm kit market. The Company also markets a home female fertility test under the FIRST RESPONSE brand name..

The Company’s NAIR depilatoryhair-removal brand is the number one selling depilatory brand in the United States,U.S., with innovative products that address consumer needs for quick, complete and longer-lasting hair removal.  The Company offers a full arrayline of depilatory products for women men and teensmen under the NAIR brand name.name, including NAIR SHOWER POWER, SPRAYS AWAY, and the Moroccan Argan Oil line of depilatories and waxes.  In 2011 and 2012,2015, the Company is introducing three new NAIR variantsMoroccan Argan Oil hair-removal products, building on the success of the lines which were launched. These include Coolintroduced in 2014.

The Company markets ORAJEL oral analgesics, which includes products for adults as well as babies, including ORAJEL Cooling Cucumber Teething Gel Roll-On Milk and Honey,BABY ORAJEL Tooth and Brazilian Spa Clay products.Gum Cleanser. The ORAJEL teething and toothache line of products is the number one brand in the U.S. In 2014, the Company introduced several teething and toothache line extensions with licensed characters under the ORAJEL trademark. In 2015, the Company is introducing ORAJEL alcohol free mouth sore rinse.

The Company markets and sells the L’IL CRITTERS children’s gummy dietary supplement line and the VITAFUSION adult gummy dietary supplement line, both number one leading brands in the gummy-form dietary supplement category. The Company also markets and sells a line of gummy probiotics under the ACCUFLORA brand name, and private label gummy dietary supplements. In 2014, the Company introduced two new lines of gummy dietary supplements: VITAFUSION MULTIVITES PLUS and L’IL CRITTERS GUMMY VITES PLUS. In 2015, the Company is introducing VITAFUSION EXTRA STRENGTH line extensions and FIRST RESPONSE reproductive health dietary supplements.  

The Company markets the SIMPLY SALINE brand of nasal saline moisturizers in the U.S., complementing the Company’s existing STERIMAR brand nasal saline solution business in Europe and other parts of the world. The Company also markets BATISTE dry shampoo in the U.S.

In 2014, the Company acquired the feminine care brands REPHRESH and REPLENS as part of the acquisition of the Lil’ Drug Store products.

Consumer International

The Consumer International segment markets a variety of personal care products, household and over-the-counter products in international markets, including Canada, France, Australia, China, the United Kingdom, Mexico Brazil and China.Brazil.  Export sales from the U.S. are included in this segment.  

Total Consumer International net sales represented approximately 19%16% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2011.2014.  Net sales of the subsidiariesbusinesses located in Europe, Canada, France, the United KingdomAustralia and Australia Mexico accounted for 36%35%, 17%34%, 17% 10% and 12%10%, respectively, of the Company’s 20112014 international net sales in this segment.  No other country in which the Company operates accounts for more than 10% of its total international net sales in this segment, and no product line accounts for more than 10%15% of total international net sales.

Certain of the Company’s international product lines are similar to its domestic product lines. Thelines and many are unique. For example, the Company markets depilatoriesits ARM & HAMMER and waxes,OXICLEAN laundry products and TROJAN condoms in Canada and Mexico, ARM & HAMMER cat litter in Canada, home pregnancy and ovulation test kits and oral care products in most of its international markets. For example, the Company markets, waxes and depilatory products in virtually all international locations and TROJAN condomsL’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplements principally in Canada and Mexico.Asia.  


The Company has expanded distribution of ARM & HAMMER products internationally by marketing ARM & HAMMER laundry and pet care products in Canada and ARM & HAMMER laundry care products in Mexico. The Company also markets SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes internationally, primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, France, China and Australia, and OXICLEAN, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO products primarily in Mexico and Canada.

Australia.  The Company sells PEARL DROPS products in Europe, Canada and Australia, STERIMAR nasal hygiene products in a number of markets in Europe, Latin America, Chinaas well as in Mexico, parts of Asia and Australia and other international markets. The Company also sells BATISTE dry shampoo principally in the United Kingdom.Kingdom, where it is the number one selling dry shampoo, Australia, Canada, France, Brazil, China and Mexico, as well as other markets including the United States. The Company also markets the CURASH line of babycare products in Australia, and GRAVOL anti-nauseant and RUB-A535 topical analgesic in Canada and other international markets.

COMPETITION FOR CONSUMER DOMESTIC AND CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL

The Company competes in the household and personal care consumer productsproduct categories, using the strengths of its trademarks and technologies. Thesewhich are highly innovative categories, characterized by a continuous flow of new products and line extensions, and requiringrequire significant advertising and promotion,promotion. The Company competes in which we competethese categories primarily on the basis of quality,product innovation and price.performance, brand recognition, price, value and other consumer benefits. Consumer products, particularly those

that are valued-priced, such as laundry and household cleaning products, as well as certain toothpaste products, are subject to significant price competition. As a result, the Company from time to time may need to reduce the prices for some of its products to respond to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain market share.share.  

Internationally, the Company’s products competeCompany competes in similar competitive categories for most of its products.

Many of theThe Company’s competitors are large companies, includinginclude The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), The Sun Products Corporation, The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Nestle Purina PetCare Company, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Johnson & Johnson, Ansell Limited, Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG, Alere Inc., NBTY, Inc. and Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.Pharmavite LLC. Many of these companies have greater financial resources than the Company and have the capacity to outspend the Company if they attempt to gain market share.share.  

Product introductions typically involve heavy marketing costsand trade spending in the year of launch, and the Company usually is not able to determine whether the new products and line extensions will be successful until a period of time has elapsed following the introduction of the new products or the extension of the product line.line.

Because of the competitive environment facing retailers, the Company faces pricing pressure from customers, particularly high-volume retailretailer store customers, who have increasingly sought to obtain pricing concessions or better trade terms. These concessions or terms could reduce the Company’s margins. Furthermore, if the Company is unable to maintain price or trade terms acceptable to its trade customers, the customersthey could increase product purchases from competitors and reduce purchases from the Company, which would harm the Company’s sales and profitability.profitability.  

DISTRIBUTION FOR CONSUMER DOMESTIC

Products in the Consumer Domestic segment are marketed throughout the United StatesU.S. primarily through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores, and dollar stores.websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company employs a sales force based regionally throughout the United States, thatU.S. and utilizes the services of independent food brokers, who represent ourthe Company’s products in the Food, Pet, Dollarfood, mass, pet, dollar and Clubclub, as well as numerous other classes of trade. The Company’s products are stored in Company plants and third-party owned warehouses and are either delivered by independent trucking companies or picked up by customers.customers at the Company’s facilities.  

DISTRIBUTION FOR CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL

Products in the Consumer International segment are sold broadly across retail platforms that include supermarkets, wholesale clubs, pharmacies and drugstores, convenience stores, discount stores and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company’s Consumer International distribution network reflects capacityis well-established and cost considerations invaries according to the regions served. In Canada, Mexiconeeds of each market.  Subsidiary countries primarily utilize internal warehousing and Australia, finished goods are warehoused internallydistribution capabilities that enable direct shipment to key retailers.  Export markets primarily rely upon third party suppliers to market, warehouse and shipped directly to customers through independent freight carriers. In the United Kingdom, domestic product distribution is subcontracted to professional distribution companies, while export product distribution is handled internally and shipped from the Company’s warehouses. In France, distribution of consumerdistribute products to mass markets is handled internally while distribution of the Company’s over-the-counter products to pharmacies and professional diagnostics to laboratories is handled by outside agencies. In Brazil and China, all product distribution is subcontracted to professional distribution companies.

end customers.  



Specialty Products (SPD)Division

Principal Products

The Company’s SPD segment focuses on sales to businesses and participates in three product areas: Specialty Chemicals, Animal Nutrition and Specialty Cleaners.Cleaners, and accounted for approximately 9% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2014.  The following table sets forth the principal products of the Company’s SPD segment.

 

Type of Product

Key Brand Names

Specialty Chemicals

ARM & HAMMER Performance Grade Sodium Bicarbonate

ARMAND PRODUCTS COMPANY Potassium Carbonate and Potassium Bicarbonate(1)

Enprove Ground Trona (2)

Enprove Sodium Bicarbonate (2)

Animal Nutrition

ARM & HAMMER Feed Grade Sodium Bicarbonate

MEGALAC Rumen Bypass Fat
SQ-810 Natural Sodium Sesquicarbonate

BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN Rumen Fermentation Enhancers

DCAD PlusPLUS Feed Grade Potassium Carbonate(2)(3)

MEGALAC R,Rumen Bypass Fat (4)

MEGALAC -R Omega 3 & Omega 6 Essential Fatty Acids(4)

MEGAMINE-L, Rumen Bypass Lysine

SQ-810 Natural Sodium Sesquicarbonate

CELMANAX  Refined Functional Carbohydrate (6)

Specialty Cleaners

ARMAKLEEN Commercial & Professional Aqueous Cleaners (5)

ARMEX Blast Media (5)

Commercial & Professional Cleaners and Deodorizers

ARMAKLEEN Aqueous Cleaners(3)
ARMEX Blast Media(3)

(1)

Manufactured and marketed by Armand Products Company an entity(“Armand”), a joint venture in which the Company holds a 50% interest.  

(2)

Distributed and marketed by Natronx, a joint venture in which the Company holds a one-third ownership interest.  Enprove is a registered trademark of FMC Corporation (“FMC”) that has been assigned to Natronx with the right of reversion to FMC upon a Natronx dissolution.

(2)

(3)

Manufactured for the Company by Armand Products Company.Armand.  

(3)

(4)

MEGALAC is a registered trademark of Volac International Limited.

(5)

Distributed in North America by The ArmaKleen Company an entity(“ArmaKleen”), a joint venture in which the Company holds a 50% joint ventureownership interest.

(6)

Acquired as part of the VI-COR acquisition in January 2015.

Specialty Chemicals

The Company’s specialty chemicals business primarily encompasses the manufacture, marketing and sale of sodium bicarbonate in a range of grades and granulations for use in industrial markets. In industrial markets, sodium bicarbonate is used by other manufacturing companies as a leavening agent for commercial baked goods, as an antacid in pharmaceuticals, as a carbon dioxide release agent in fire extinguishers, as an alkaline agent in swimming pool chemicals, and as a buffer in kidney dialysis.dialysis.  

The Company’s 99.2% owned Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral do Nordeste (“QGN”), markets sodium bicarbonate in Brazil and is South America’s leading provider of sodium bicarbonate.  The business, which has annual revenues of approximately $40 million, markets sodium bicarbonate, dairy products and other chemicals in Brazil.

The Company and Occidental PetroleumChemical Corporation are equal partners in a joint venture, Armand, Products Company, which manufactures and markets potassium carbonate and potassium bicarbonate for sale in domestic and international markets. The potassium-based products are used in a wide variety of applications, including agricultural products, specialty glass and ceramics, and potassium silicates. Armand Products also manufactures for the Company a potassium carbonate-based animal feed additive for sale in the dairy industry, described below under “Animal Nutrition Products.”

On September 22, 2011, theThe Company, together with FMC Corporation and TATA Chemicals formed an operating joint venture, Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”).(Soda Ash) Partners are equal partners in Natronx. The Company has a one-third ownership interest in Natronx, and itsCompany’s investment is accounted for under the equity method. The joint venture will engageNatronx engages in the manufacturingmarketing and marketingdistribution of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. The sorbents, primarily sodium bicarbonate and trona, are used by coal-fired utilities

to remove harmful pollutants, such as acid gases, in flue-gas treatment processes. Natronx intends to invest approximately $60 million to construct a 450,000 ton per year facility in Wyoming to produce trona sorbents by the fourth quarter of 2012, the cost of which will be equally shared among all members. The joint venture started business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the Company made an initial investment of approximately $3 million and is committed to investing upwards of an additional $17 million in 2012.processes.  


Animal Nutrition Products

A special grade of sodium bicarbonate, as well as sodium sesquicarbonate, is sold to the animal feed market as a feed additive for use by the dairy industry as a buffer, or antacid, for dairy cattle. The Company also markets DCAD PlusPLUS feed grade potassium carbonate, which is manufactured by the Armand Products Company as a feed additive into the animal feed market.market.  

The Company markets MEGALAC rumen bypass fat, a nutritional supplement made from natural oils, which enables cows to maintain energy levels during the period of high milk production, resulting in improved milk yields and minimized weight loss. The product and the trademark MEGALACMegalac are licensed under a long-term license agreement from a British company, Volac Ltd.International Limited.

The Company also markets BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN, a range of specialty feed ingredients for dairy cows, which improve rumen feed efficiency and help increase milk production.production.

On January 2, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Varied Industries Corporation (the “VI-COR Acquisition”) a manufacturer and seller of feed ingredients for cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock, including CELMANAX Refined Functional Carbohydrate and other feed additives for sale in domestic and international markets and used to promote livestock digestive health and performance.

Specialty Cleaners

The Company also provides a line of cleaning and deodorizing products for use in commercial and industrial applications such as office buildings, hotels, restaurants and other facilities.facilities.

The Company and Safety-Kleen CorporationSystems, Inc. (“Safety-Kleen”) are equal partners in a joint venture, The ArmaKleen, Company, which was formed to buildhas built a specialty cleaning products business based on the Company’s technology and Safety-Kleen’s sales and distribution organization. In North America, this joint venture distributes the Company’s proprietary product line of aqueous cleaners along with the Company’s ARMEX blast media line, which is designed for the removal of a wide variety of surface coatings. The Company continues to pursue opportunities to build this industrial cleaning business using the Company’s aqueous-based technology as well as the ARMEX blast media line of products.

COMPETITION FOR SPD

Competition within the specialty chemicals and animal nutrition product lines is intense. The specialty chemicals business operates in a competitive environment influenced by capacity utilization, customers’ leverage and the impact of raw material and energy costs. Product introductions typically involve introductory costs in the year of launch, and the Company usually is not able to determine whether new products and line extensions will be successful until sometimea period of time has elapsed following the introduction of new products or the extension of the product lines. The Company’s key competitors are Solvay Chemicals, Inc., FMC and Natural Soda, Inc.

DISTRIBUTION FOR SPD

SPD markets sodium bicarbonate and other chemicals to industrial and agricultural customers primarily throughout the United StatesU.S. and Canada. Distribution is accomplished through a dedicated sales force supplemented by manufacturer’smanufacturers’ representatives and the sales personnel of independent distributors throughout the country. The Company’s products in this segment are located in Company plants and public warehouses and are either delivered by independent trucking companies or picked up by customers at the Company’s facilities.

facilities.

RAW MATERIALS AND SOURCES OF SUPPLY

The Company manufactures sodium bicarbonate for both its consumer and specialty products businesses at its plants located at Green River, Wyoming and Old Fort, Ohio. The primary source of soda ash, a basic raw material used by the Company in the production of sodium bicarbonate, is the mineral trona, which is found in abundance in southwestern Wyoming near the Company’s Green River plant. The Company has adequate trona reserves under mineral leases to support the Company’s sodium bicarbonate requirements for the foreseeable future.future.

The Company is party to a partnership agreement with General Chemical Corporation,Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners, which mines and processes trona reserves in Wyoming. Through the partnership and related supply and services agreements, the Company fulfills a substantial amount of its soda ash requirements, enabling the Company to achieve some of the economies of an integrated business capable of producing


sodium bicarbonate and related products from the basic raw material. The Company also has an agreement for the supply of soda ash from another company. The partnership agreement and other supply agreements between the Company and General ChemicalTata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners are terminable upon two years notice by either company. The Company believes that sufficient alternative sources of supply are available.

The Company believes that ample sources of raw materials are available for all of its other major products. Detergent chemicals are used in a variety of the Company’s products and are available from a number of sources. Bottles, paper products and clay are available from multiple suppliers, although the Company chooses to source most of these materials from single sources under long-term supply agreements in order to gain favorable pricing. The Company also uses a palm oil fraction (by-product) in its rumen bypass fats products. Alternative sources of supply are available in case of disruption or termination of the supply agreements.agreements.

The trendcost of higher raw material costs continued into 2011. As a result, the cost ofmaterials, including surfactants, diesel fuel palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD), latex, corrugated paper and oil-based raw and packaging materials used primarily in the household and specialty productsconsumer businesses, were all highercontinued to be high in 2011 than 2010. Additional increases2014 relative to prior years. However, while the market price of ethylene-based resin was at an all-time high in 2014, the Company’s cost for this material was partially mitigated as a result of the Company’s ability to contractually lock in pricing for 2014. Increases in the prices of certain raw materials could materially impact the Company’s costs and financial results if the Company is unable to pass such costs along in the form of price increases to its customers.customers.

The Company utilizes the services of third party contract manufacturers around the world for certain products.

PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS

The Company’s trademarks (identifiedappear in upper case letters throughout this report in capitalized letters), including ARM & HAMMER,Annual Report. The majority of the Company’s trademarks are registered with either the United StatesU.S. Patent and Trademark Office and alsoor with the trademark offices of many foreign countries. The ARM & HAMMER trademark has been used by the Company since 1867, and is a valuable asset and important to the successful operation of the Company’s business. The Company’s products are sold under many other valuable trademarks includeheld by the Company, including TROJAN, NAIR, ORAJEL, FIRST RESPONSE, XTRA, OXICLEAN, SPINBRUSH, BATISTE, SIMPLY SALINE, FELINE PINE, L’IL CRITTERS, VITAFUSION, REPHRESH and FELINE PINE.REPLENS. The Company’s portfolio of trademarks represents substantial goodwill in the businesses using the trademarks.trademarks.

United StatesU.S. patents are currently granted for a term of 20 years from the date the patent application is filed. Although the Company actively seeks and maintains a number of patents, no single patent is considered significant to the business as a whole.whole.  

CUSTOMERS AND ORDER BACKLOG

In each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010,2014, 2013, and 2009,2012, net sales to the Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates (“Wal-Mart”), were 23%25%, 23%24% and 22%24% respectively, of the Company’s total consolidated net sales.  The time between receipt of orders and shipment is generally short, and as a result, backlog is not significant.  No other customer accounted for 10% or more than 10% of consolidated net sales in the three yearthree-year period.

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

The Company conducts research and development activities primarily at its Princeton and Cranbury facilities in New Jersey.  The Company devotes significant resources and attention to product development, process technology and basic research to develop differentiated products with new and distinctive features and to provide increased convenience and value to its customers.  To increase its innovative capabilities, the Company engages outside contractors for general research and development in activities beyond its core areas of expertise.  The Company spent $55.1$59.8 million, $53.7$61.8 million and $55.1$54.8 million on research and development activities in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

General

Some of the Company’s products are subject to regulation by one or more United StatesU.S. agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”), and foreign agencies.

FDA regulations govern a variety of matters relating to ourthe Company’s products, such as product development, manufacturing, premarket clearance or approval, advertising and distribution. The regulations adopted and standards imposed by the FDA and similar


foreign agencies evolve over time and can require the Company to make changes in its manufacturing processes and quality systems to remain in compliance. These agencies periodically inspect manufacturing and other facilities. If we failthe Company fails to comply with applicable regulations and standards, weit may be subject to sanctions, including fines and penalties, the recall of products and cessation of manufacturing and/or distribution.

In addition, the Company sells products that are subject to regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act, which are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”).EPA. The Company also is subject to regulation by the FTC in connection with the content of its labeling, advertising, promotion, trade practices and other matters. matters.

The CPSC administers the Poison Prevention Packaging Act, and has issued regulations requiring special child resistant packaging for certain products, including pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements, and dietary substances, containing certain ingredients (e.g., iron).

The Company’s relationship with certain union employees may be overseen by the National Labor Relations Board. The Company’s activities also are regulated by various agencies of the countries, states, localitiesprovinces and foreign countriesother localities in which the Company sells its products.products.  

Medical Device Clearance and Approval

To be commercially distributed in the U.S., a medical device must, unless exempt, receive clearance or approval from the FDA pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Lower risk devices are categorized as either class I or II devices. For class II devices, for which the manufacturer must generally submit a premarket notification requesting permissionclearance for commercial distribution known as a “510(k) clearance.Ourclearance. The Company’s condoms, lubricants, contact lens solution, wound wash and home pregnancy and ovulation test kits are generally regulated as class II devices. Some low risk devices, including our SPINBRUSH and other battery powered toothbrushes, are in class I and are generally exempted from athe 510(k) requirement. To obtain 510(k) clearance, a device must be determined to be substantially equivalent in intended use and in safety and effectiveness to a previously 510(k) cleared device.benchmark device, or “predicate” that is already legally in commercial distribution. Any modification to a 510(k) cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, generally requires a new clearance or approval.510(k) clearance. A manufacturer may determine that a new 510(k) clearance is not required, but if the FDA disagrees, it may retroactively require a 510(k) clearance and may require the manufacturer to cease marketing or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance is obtained. For example, the FDA recently required the Company to submit three 510(k) notifications for modifications to its condom products, where the FDA believed that the Company should have filed a 510(k) prior to making the modifications. The Company submitted these 510(k) notifications in January 2012. To date, the FDA has not required the Company to cease marketing the modified products during the pendency of the 510(k) submissions.

obtained.  

Medical Device Postmarket Regulation

After a medical device is commercialized, numerous regulatory requirements apply, including:

  

the quality system regulation, which imposes current good manufacturing practice

·

the quality system regulation, which imposes FDA current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) requirements governing the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the design, manufacture, packaging, servicing, labeling, storage, installation, and distribution of all finished medical devices intended for human use;

·

labeling regulations, including a prohibition on product promotion for unapproved or “off label” uses;

·

the medical device reporting regulation requiring a manufacturer to report to the FDA if its device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and

·

the reports of corrections and removals regulation, which requires a manufacturer to report recalls and field actions to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health.

labeling regulations prohibiting product promotion for unapproved or “off label” uses;

the medical device reporting regulation requiring a manufacturer to report to the FDA if its device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and

the reports of corrections and removals regulation, which requires a manufacturer to report recalls and field actions to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA.

OTC Pharmaceutical

The Company hasmarkets over-the-counter (OTC)(“OTC”) pharmaceutical products, such as our toothpaste, antiperspirant, and oral analgesics products, that are also subject to FDA and foreign regulation. Under the U.S. OTC monograph system, selected OTC pharmaceutical products are generally recognized as safe and effective and do not require the submission and approval of a new drug application. The FDA OTC Monograph System, the FDA issues regulations, known as “monographs,” that specify the activemonographs include well-known ingredients and specify requirements for permitted indications, required warnings and precautions, allowable combinations of ingredients and dosage levelslevels. Pharmaceutical products marketed under the OTC monograph system must conform to specific quality, formula and required warningslabeling requirements.

All facilities where OTC pharmaceutical products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored or distributed must comply with cGMP regulations and/or regulations promulgated by competent authorities in the countries where the facilities are located. All of the


Company’s pharmaceutical products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored and precautions. In addition,distributed according to cGMP regulations. The FDA performs periodic audits to ensure that the Company’s facilities remain in compliance with all appropriate regulations. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to a breach of representations made to customers or to regulatory action against the Company related to the products made in that facility, such as seizure, injunction or recall. Serious product quality concerns could also result in governmental actions against the Company that, among other things, could result in the suspension of production or distribution of the Company’s facilitiesproducts, product seizures, loss of certain licenses or other governmental penalties, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operating results. The manufacturer, packer, or distributor of an OTC pharmaceutical product marketed in the pharmaceutical productionU.S. whose name appears on the label of such product is required to report serious adverse events associated with the use of the product.  

The Company cannot predict whether new legislation regulating the Company’s activities will be enacted or what effect any legislation would have on the Company’s business.

Food Products

The Company markets baking soda and animal feed products, such as rumen fermentation enhancers and DCAD balancers, that are also subject to FDA and foreign regulation. In 2011, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was enacted, changing the ways in which food and animal feed products are regulated. Under the provisions of the Act, the emphasis shifted from compliant products to mandatory preventive controls including hazard analysis, risk controls, supplier qualifications and controls and increased record keeping. FSMA grants the FDA the authority to require mandatory recalls for products under certain conditions. The FDA is currently in the process of establishing rules and guidance to implement the provisions of FSMA.  The potential impact of these rules and applicable guidance cannot be determined at this time.

Dietary Supplements

The processing, formulation, safety, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising, distribution, chain must comply with FDA’s good manufacturing practices regulationsimporting, selling, and storing of dietary supplements are subject to regulation by one or more federal agencies, including the FDA, the FTC, the CPSC, the EPA, and by various agencies of the states and localities in which the Company’s products are sold. The FDCA governs the composition, safety, labeling, manufacturing and marketing of dietary supplements.  

Generally, dietary ingredients that were marketed in the U.S. prior to October 15, 1994 may be used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. “New” dietary ingredients (i.e. dietary ingredients that were not marketed in the U.S. before October 15, 1994) must be the subject of a new dietary ingredient notification submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before the initial marketing unless the ingredient has been present in the food supply as an article used for food without being chemically altered. A new dietary ingredient notification must provide evidence of a history of use or other evidence establishing that use of the dietary ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe. The FDA may determine that a new dietary ingredient notification does not provide an adequate basis to conclude that a dietary ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe. Such a determination could effectively prevent the marketing of the dietary ingredient. On July 5, 2011, the FDA issued draft guidance governing notification of new dietary ingredients. The draft guidance was issued for public comment and not for implementation. To date the FDA has not taken any further steps towards implementing the guidance. The guidance, if implemented, could effectively change the status of dietary ingredients that the industry has marketed as “old” dietary ingredients to “new” dietary ingredients that may require submission of a new dietary ingredient notification.  

The FDCA permits “statements of nutritional support” to be included in labeling for dietary supplements without FDA pre-market approval. The FDA must be notified of those statements within 30 days of marketing. Among other things, the statements may describe the role of a dietary ingredient intended to affect the structure or function of the body or characterize the documented mechanism of action by which a dietary ingredient maintains such structure or function, but may not expressly or implicitly represent that a dietary supplement will diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease. A company that uses a statement of nutritional support in labeling must possess information substantiating that the statement is truthful and not misleading. If the FDA determines that a particular statement of nutritional support is an unacceptable drug claim or an unauthorized version of a health claim, or if the FDA determines that a particular claim is not adequately supported by existing scientific evidence or is otherwise false or misleading, the claim could not be used and any product bearing the claim could be subject to regulatory action.

The FDA’s cGMP regulations govern the manufacturing, packaging, labeling and holding operations of dietary supplement manufacturers. As with OTC products, the FDA performs periodic audits to ensure that the Company’s dietary supplement facilities remain in compliance with all appropriate regulations. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to a breach of representation made to customers or to regulatory action against the Company related to the products made in that facility, seizure, injunction or recall. There remains considerable uncertainty with respect to the FDA’s periodic audits.

For information regarding recent FDA actions pertaining tointerpretation of the Company, see ”Risk Factors—Failure by us or certaincGMP regulations and their actual implementation in manufacturing facilities. The failure of our suppliersa manufacturing facility to comply with variousthe cGMP regulations


may render products manufactured in that facility adulterated, and subjects those products and the manufacturer to a variety of potential FDA enforcement actions. In addition, under recent amendments to the FDCA, the manufacturing of dietary ingredients contained in dietary supplements will be subject to similar or even more burdensome requirements, which may increase the costs of dietary ingredients and subject suppliers of such ingredients to more rigorous inspections and enforcement. The manufacturer, packer, or distributor of a dietary supplement marketed in the countries which we operate could expose usU.S. whose name appears on the label of the supplement is required to report serious adverse events associated with the use of that supplement to the FDA.

The FTC exercises jurisdiction over the advertising of dietary supplements. The FTC considers whether a product’s advertising claims are accurate, truthful and not misleading pursuant to its authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act, or FTC Act. The FTC has instituted numerous enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies for failure to adequately substantiate claims made in advertising or other adverse consequences,”for the use of otherwise false or misleading advertising claims. These enforcement actions have resulted in Item 1Aconsent decrees and the payment of this report.civil penalties and/or restitution by the companies involved. Such actions can result in substantial financial penalties and significantly restrict the marketing of a dietary supplement.

Legislation may be introduced which, if passed, would impose substantial new regulatory requirements on dietary supplements. The effect of additional domestic or international governmental legislation, regulations, or administrative orders, if and when promulgated, cannot be determined. New legislation or regulations may require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, and require the recall or discontinuance of certain products not capable of reformulation.  

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The Company’s operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws, rules and regulations relating to environmental and health and safety concerns including air emissions, wastewater discharges, and solid and hazardous waste management activities. The Company endeavors to take actions necessary to comply with such regulations. These steps include periodic environmental audits of each Company facility.facilities. The audits, conducted by independent engineering firms with expertise in environmental compliance, include site visits at each location, as well as a review of documentary information, to determine compliance with such federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations. Other than as described under Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in this report, the Company believes that it is in material compliance with existing environmental regulations.regulations.    

See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in this reportAnnual Report for information regarding an environmental proceeding relating to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary.

GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

Approximately 79%81%, 79%80% and 81%79% of the Company’s net sales in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, were to customers in the United States.U.S.  Approximately 96%, 96%97% and 95%97% of the Company’s long-lived assets were located in the United StatesU.S. at December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.  Other than the United States,U.S., no one country accounts for more than 7% of consolidated net sales and 3%5% of total assets.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2011,2014, the Company had approximately 3,5004,200 employees.  The Company is party to a labor contract with the International Machinists Union at its Colonial Heights, Virginia plant, which expires May 31, 2013.2018.  Internationally, the Company employs union employees in France, Mexico, Brazil and New Zealand.  The Company believes that its relations with both its union and non-union employees are satisfactory.

CLASSES OF SIMILAR PRODUCTS

The Company’s operations, exclusive of unconsolidated entities, constitute three reportable segments,segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products (SPD).SPD.  The table set forth below shows the percentage of the Company’s net sales (exclusive of net sales of unconsolidated entities) contributed by each group of similar products marketed by the Company during 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009.2012.


 

 

% of Net Sales

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Consumer Domestic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Household Products

 

 

45%

 

 

 

45%

 

 

 

48%

 

Personal Care Products

 

 

30%

 

 

 

30%

 

 

 

26%

 

Consumer International

 

 

16%

 

 

 

17%

 

 

 

17%

 

Specialty Products

 

 

9%

 

 

 

8%

 

 

 

9%

 

 

   % of Net Sales 
(In millions)  2011  2010  2009 

Consumer Domestic

    

Household Products

   47  47  47

Personal Care Products

   25  26  27

Consumer International

   19  17  16

Specialty Products

   9  10  10

The table above reflects consolidated net sales, exclusive of net sales of unconsolidated entities.

PUBLIC INFORMATION

The Company maintains a web sitewebsite at www.churchdwight.com and on the “Investors—SEC Filings” page of the web sitewebsite makes available free of charge the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files these materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on the “Investors—Corporate Governance” page on the Company’s website are the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for the Audit, Compensation & Organization and Governance & Nominating Committees of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s Code of Conduct. Each of the foregoing is also available in print free of charge and may be obtained upon written request to: Church & Dwight Co., Inc., 469 North Harrison Street, Princeton,500 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, New Jersey 08543,08628, attention: Secretary. The information presented in the Company’s web sitewebsite is not a part of this reportAnnual Report and the reference to the Company’s web sitewebsite is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

only.



ITEMITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

The following risks and uncertainties, as well as others described elsewhere in this report,Annual Report, could materially adversely affect ourthe Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition:

Economic conditions could adversely affect our business.

·

Unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect demand for the Company’s products.  

Uncertainty about current globalUnfavorable and uncertain economic conditions hashave adversely affected, and in the future may adversely affect, demand for some of ourthe categories of products the Company sells, resulting in reduced sales volume or market share or a shift in its product mix from higher margin to lower margin products. Factors that can affect demand include competitors’ products, advertising and pricing actions, rates of unemployment, consumer confidence, health care costs, fuel and other energy costs and other economic factors affecting consumer spending behavior.behavior, including delays in the timing of tax refunds from the federal government, gasoline and home heating oil pricing, reduced unemployment benefits in periods of high unemployment and tax increases. While the vast majority of the Company’s products generally are consumer staples that should be less vulnerable to decreases in discretionary spending than other products, they may become subject to increasing price competition as recessionary conditions continue.competition. Moreover, some of ourthe Company’s products, such as laundry additives, gummy dietary supplements and battery-operated toothbrushes, are more likely to be affected by consumer decisions to control spending.

Some of ourthe Company’s customers, including mass merchandisers, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores, wholesale clubs, pet specialtyhome stores, and dollar, pet and other specialty stores, have experienced and may experience in the future declining financial performance, which could affect their ability to pay amounts due to usthe Company on a timely basis or at all. In response, weThe Company regularly conduct a review ofreviews the financial strength of ourits key customers. Ascustomers and, where appropriate, we modifymodifies customer credit limits, which may have an adverse impact on future sales. Because the same economic conditions are impactingthat affect the Company also affect many of ourthe Company’s suppliers, we alsothe Company regularly conductconducts a similar review of ourits suppliers to assess both their financial viability and the importance of their products to ourthe Company’s operations. WhereWhen appropriate, we intend to identifythe Company identifies alternate sources of materials and services. To date, we havethe Company has not experienced a material adverse impact from economic conditions affecting ourits customers or suppliers. However, a continuedprotracted economic declinedownturn that adversely affects ourthe Company’s suppliers and customers could adversely affect ourits sales and results of operations.  

·

The Company faces intense competition in its markets, and the failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces intense competition from consumer products companies, both in the U.S. and sales.

In recent years, the banking system and financial markets have experienced severe disruption, including, among other things, bank failures and consolidations, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades, declines in asset valuations, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These conditions present the following risks to us, among others:

We are dependent on the continued financial viabilityinternational markets. Most of the financial institutions that participate in the syndicate that is generally obligated to fund our Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement includes a “commitment increase” feature that enables us to increase the size of the revolving credit facility, subject to lending commitmentsCompany’s products compete with other widely-advertised brands within each product category and certain conditions. Any disruption in the credit markets could limit the availability of credit or the ability or willingness of financial institutions to extend credit, which could adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources. If any financial institutions that are parties to the Credit Agreement are unable to honor their funding commitments, the cash availability under our Credit Agreement and Commercial Paper program may be curtailed.

Downgrades in our credit ratings and other effects of volatile economic conditions on the credit market could reduce our liquidity or increase our borrowing costs and liquidity. Our short- and long-term credit ratings affect our borrowing costs and access to financing. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to issue commercial paper. Disruptions in the commercial paper market or other effects of volatile economic conditions on the credit market also could raise our borrowing costs for both short- and long-term debt offerings. Either scenario could adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources.

We have not been notified of any circumstances that would prevent any participating financial institution from funding our Credit Agreement. However, under current or future circumstances, such constraints may exist. Although we believe that our operating cash flows, together with our access to the credit markets, provide us with significant discretionary funding capacity, the inability of one or more institutions to fulfill their funding obligations under the Credit Agreement could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations.

If our customers discontinue or reduce distribution of our products or increase private label products, our sales may decline, adversely affecting our financial performance.

The economic crisis caused many of our customers to more critically analyze the number of brands they sell which has resulted in their reduction or discontinuance of certain of our product lines, particularly those products that are not number one or two in their category. If this occurs and we are unable to improve distribution for those products at other customers, our Company’s results could be adversely affected.

In addition, many of our customers sell products under their own private label brands thatand generic non-branded products of its customers in certain categories, which typically are sold at lower prices.

The Company’s products generally compete with products that we sell. As consumers look for opportunities to decrease discretionary spending, our customers have discontinued or reduced distribution of some of our products to encourage those consumers to purchase our customers’ less expensive private label products. To the extent some of our products are discontinued or are adversely affected by our trade customers’ actions to increase shelf space for their private label products, we are focusing our efforts on improving distribution with other customers. Our results could be adversely affected if our efforts are not effective.

If the reputation of one or more of our leading brands erodes our financial results could suffer.

Our financial success is directly dependent on the successbasis of our brands, particularly the ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN and TROJAN brands. The success of these brands can suffer if our marketing plansperformance, brand recognition, price, value or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand’s image or its abilityother benefits to attract consumers. Further, our results could be adversely affected if one of our leading brands suffers damage to its reputation due to real or perceived quality issues.

We continue to develop and commercialize new products and product line extensions, but if they do not gain widespread customer acceptance or if they cause sales of our existing products to decline, our financial performance could decline.

We strive to introduce new products that are based on current and new technology. The development and introduction of new products involves substantial research, development, marketing and promotional expenditures, which we may be unable to recover if the new products do not gain widespread market acceptance. In addition, if sales generated by new products result in a concomitant decline in sales of our existing products, our financial performance could be harmed.

We may discontinue products or product lines which could result in returns, asset write-offs and shutdown costs. We also may engage in product recalls that would reduce our cash flow and earnings and could be detrimental to the brand reputation.

From time to time, we have discontinued certain products and product lines, which resulted in returns from customers, asset write-offs and shutdown costs. We may suffer similar adverse consequences in the future to the extent we discontinue products that do not meet expectations or no longer satisfy consumer demand. Moreover, product quality defects or safety concerns could result in product recalls. Product returns or recalls, write-offs or shutdown costs would reduce sales, cash flow and earnings and damage the product’s brand reputation.

We face intense competition in a mature industry and we may be required to increase expenditures and accept lower profit margins to preserve or maintain our market share. Unless the markets in which we compete grow substantially, a loss of market share will result in reduced sales levels and declining operating results.

During 2011, approximately 79% of our sales were generated in U.S. markets. U.S. markets for consumer products are considered mature and commonly characterized by high household penetration, particularly with respect to our most significant product categories, such as laundry detergents, deodorizers, household cleaning products, toothpastes, antiperspirants and deodorants. Our unit sales growth in domestic markets will depend on increased use of our products by consumers, product innovation and our ability to capture market share from competitors. We may not succeed in implementing strategies to increase domestic revenues.

The consumer products industry, particularly the laundry detergent, personal care and air deodorizer categories, is intensely competitive. To protect existing market share or to capture increased market share, we may need to increase expenditures for promotion and advertising and to introduce and establish new products. Increased expenditures may not prove successful in maintaining or enhancing market share and could result in lower sales and profits. Many of our competitors are large companies, including The Procter & Gamble Company, Sun Products Corporation, The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Johnson & Johnson, Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc. and S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Many of these companies have greater financial resources than we do, and, therefore, have the capacity to outspend us should they attempt to gain market share. If we lose market share and the markets in which we compete do not grow substantially, our sales levels and operating results will decline.

Providing price concessions or trade terms that are acceptable to our customers, or the failure to do so, could adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Consumer products, particularly those that are value-priced like many of our products are subject to significant price competition. As a result, wethe Company may need to reduce the prices for some of ourits products, or increase prices by an amount that does not cover manufacturing cost increases, to respond to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain market share. Any reduction in prices, or inability to raise prices sufficiently to cover manufacturing cost increases, in response to these pressures would harm profit margins. In addition, if ourthe Company’s sales volumes fail to grow sufficiently to offset any reduction in margins, ourits sales growth and other results of operations would suffer.suffer.

BecauseAdvertising, promotion, merchandising and packaging also have a significant impact on retail customer decisions regarding the brands and product lines they sell and on consumer purchasing decisions. A newly introduced consumer product (whether improved or newly developed) usually encounters intense competition requiring substantial expenditures for advertising, sales promotion and trade merchandising. If a product gains consumer acceptance, it normally requires continued advertising, promotional support and product improvements to maintain its relative market position. If the Company’s advertising, marketing and promotional programs are not effective, its sales growth may decline.  

Many of the competitive environment facing manyCompany’s competitors are large companies, including P&G, The Sun Products Corporation, The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Johnson & Johnson, Nestle Purina PetCare Company, Ansell Limited, Alere Inc., Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Pharmavite LLC and NBTY, Inc. Many of ourthese companies have greater financial resources than does the Company, and, therefore, have the capacity to outspend the Company on advertising and promotional activities and introduce competing products more quickly and respond more effectively to changing business and economic conditions than can the Company. In addition, the Company’s competitors may attempt to gain market share by offering products at prices at or below those typically offered by it. Competitive activity may require the Company to increase its spending on advertising and promotions and/or reduce prices, which could lead to reduced profits and adversely affect growth. If the Company loses market share or the markets in which it competes do not grow substantially, its sales growth will decline.  


Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has been significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category, contributing to an overall category decline. During 2012, 2013 and 2014, the category declined 0.6%, an additional 3.2% and an additional 2.9%, respectively. In 2014, P&G, the market leader in premium laundry detergent, including unit dose laundry detergent, reconfigured certain of its product offerings and related marketing and pricing strategies and launched various products to compete more directly with the Company’s core ARM & HAMMER, XTRA and OXICLEAN power brands. Specifically, P&G launched lower-priced laundry detergents to compete directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents and has launched a versatile stain remover to compete with the Company’s pre-wash additive, OXICLEAN, supported by aggressive trade spending and marketing.  These actions and price competition could negatively impact the Company’s laundry detergent and versatile stain remover businesses.    

·

Loss of any of its principal customers could significantly decrease the Company’s sales and profitability.  

A limited number of customers account for a large percentage of the Company’s net sales.  Wal-Mart is the Company’s largest customer, accounting for approximately 25% of net sales in 2014, 24% of net sales in 2013 and 24% of net sales in 2012.  The Company’s top three customers accounted for approximately 36% of net sales in 2014, 35% of net sales in 2013 and 34% of net sales in 2012.  The Company expects that a significant portion of its net sales will continue to be derived from a small number of customers and that these percentages may increase if the growth of mass merchandisers continues. As a result, changes in the strategies of Wal-Mart or any of the Company’s other largest customers, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry or of shelf space they dedicate to private label products, could materially harm the Company’s net sales and profitability.  

In addition, the Company’s business is based primarily upon individual sales orders as it rarely enters into long-term contracts with its customers and most customer agreements include customer termination rights after short notice. Accordingly, these customers could reduce their purchasing levels or cease buying products from the Company at any time and for any reason. If the Company loses a significant customer or if sales of its products to a significant customer materially decrease, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.  

·

Changes in the policies of the Company’s retailer customers and increasing dependence on key retailer customers in developed markets may adversely affect its business.  

In recent years, the Company has seen increasing retailer consolidation both in the U.S. and internationally. This trend has resulted in the increased size and influence of large consolidated retailer customers, who may demand lower pricing, special packaging or impose other requirements on the Company. These business demands may relate to inventory practices, logistics or other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. Some of the Company’s customers, particularly ourits high-volume retail store customers, have increasingly sought to obtain pricing concessions or better trade terms. To the extent we providethe Company provides concessions or better trade terms ourto those customers, its margins are reduced. Further, if we arethe Company is unable to maintain terms that are acceptableeffectively respond to our tradethe demands of its customers, these trade customers could reduce their purchases of ourCompany products and increase their purchases of products from our competitors, which would harm ourthe Company’s sales and profitability.

Reductions In addition, reductions in inventory by our tradethe Company’s customers, including as a result of consolidations in the retail industry, could adversely affect orders for our products in periods during which the reduction occurs.

From time to time our retailor these customers may reduce inventory levels in managing their working capital requirements. Any reduction in inventory levels by our retail customers will result in reduced orders and harm our operating results for the financial periods affected by the reductions. In particular, continued consolidation within the retail industry could potentially reduce inventory levels maintained by our retail customers, whichrequirements, could result in reduced orders for Company products and adversely affect ourits results of operations for the financial periods affected by the reductions.reductions.  

Protracted unfavorable market conditions have caused many of the Company’s customers to more critically analyze the number of brands they sell, and reduce or discontinue certain of the Company’s product lines, particularly those products that were not number one or two in their category. If this continues to occur and the Company is unable to improve distribution for those products at other customers, its results could be adversely affected.  

A continued shiftIn addition, private label products sold by retail trade chains are typically sold at lower prices than branded products. As consumers look for opportunities to decrease discretionary spending, the Company’s customers have discontinued or reduced distribution of some of its products to encourage those consumers to purchase the customers’ less expensive private label products (primarily in the retaildietary supplements, diagnostic kits and oral analgesics categories). To the extent customers discontinue or reduce distribution of the Company’s products or these products are adversely affected by customers’ actions to increase shelf space for their private label products, the Company would seek to improve distribution with other customers. However, if the Company’s efforts are not effective, its sales growth and other results, as well as its market from food and drug stores to club stores and mass merchandisersshare, could cause our sales to decline.be adversely affected.

·

A continued shift in the retail market from food and drug stores to club stores, dollar stores and mass merchandisers could cause the Company’s sales to decline.  

Our The Company’s performance also depends upon the general health of the economy and of the retail environment in particular, and could be significantly harmed by changes affecting retailing and by the financial difficulties of retailers.the Company’s retailer customers. Consumer products, such as those marketed by usthe Company, are increasingly being sold by club stores, dollar stores and mass merchandisers, while sales of consumer products by food and drug stores comprise a smaller proportion


merchandisers. Sales of the total volume of consumerCompany’s products sold. Sales of our products are strongerremain strongest in the mass merchandiser, food and drug channels of trade, and not as strongthe Company’s products are also being sold in the club stores and mass merchandiserdollar stores channels. Although we havethe Company has taken steps to improve, and has seen improvement in, sales to club stores and mass merchandisers,dollar stores, if we arethe current trend continues and the Company is not successful in further improving sales to these channels, and the current trend continues, ourits financial condition and operating results could suffer.

suffer.  

·

Market category declines and changes to the Company’s product and geographic mix may impact the achievement of the Company’s sales growth targets, planned pricing and financial results.

LossA significant percentage of anythe Company’s revenues comes from mature markets that are subject to high levels of our principal customers could significantly decrease ourcompetition.  During 2014, approximately 80% of the Company’s sales were generated in U.S. markets.  U.S. markets for consumer products are considered mature and profitability.

Wal-Mart, togethercommonly characterized by high household penetration, particularly with respect to the Company’s most significant product categories, such as laundry detergents, deodorizers, household cleaning products, toothpastes, dietary supplements, antiperspirants and deodorants. The Company’s ability to achieve unit sales growth in domestic markets will depend on increased use of its affiliates,products by consumers relative to competitors’ products, its ability to drive growth through product innovation in existing and new product categories, investment in its established brands and enhanced merchandising and its ability to capture market share from its competitors. If the Company is our largest customer, accounting for approximately 23% of netunable to increase market share in existing product lines, develop product improvements, undertake sales, marketing and advertising initiatives that expand its product categories and develop, acquire or successfully launch new products, it may not achieve its sales growth objectives. Even if the Company is successful in 2011, 23% of netincreasing sales in 2010 and 22% of net sales in 2009. Our top three customers accounted for

approximately 33% of net sales in 2011, 33% of net sales in 2010 and 32% of net sales in 2009. The loss ofwithin its product categories, a continuing or a substantial decreaseaccelerating decline in the volumeoverall markets for the Company’s products could have a negative impact on its financial results.

·

Cost overruns and delays, regulatory requirements, and miscalculations in capacity needs with respect to the Company’s expansion projects could adversely affect its business.

The Company initiates expansion projects from time to time. For example, the Company is currently expanding its gummy dietary supplements production capacity at its York, Pennsylvania manufacturing facility to meet expected future product demand. The new gummy dietary supplements line is expected to start production in the first quarter of purchases by Wal-Mart2015. Projects of this type are subject to risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project resulting from numerous factors, including the following: shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor; work stoppages; unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and its affiliatesequipment; unanticipated cost increases; difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or anyin meeting permit conditions; difficulties in meeting regulatory requirements or obtaining regulatory approvals; availability of our other largest customers would harm our salessuppliers to certify equipment for existing and profitability.

Failure to repay our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial conditionenhanced regulations; design and ability to operate our businesses.

Asengineering problems; and failure or delay of December 31, 2011, we had $252.3 million of total consolidated indebtedness. Our failure tothird party service our indebtednessproviders, civil unrest and labor disputes. Significant cost overruns or obtain additional financing as neededdelays in completing a project could have a material adverse effect on our business operatingthe Company’s return on investment, results of operations and financial condition.

We may make acquisitions that result in dilution to our current stockholders or increase our indebtedness, or both.cash flows. In addition, acquisitions that are not properly integrated or are otherwise unsuccessfulif the Company miscalculates its anticipated capacity needs, this too could strain or divert our resources.

We have made several acquisitions in recent years, including businesses previously operated by Del Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Orange Glo International, Inc., the SIMPLY SALINE nasal moisturizer product line, the FELINE PINE natural cat litter product line and the BATISTE dry shampoo product line. We may make additional acquisitions or substantial investments in complementary businesses or products in the future. Any future acquisitions or investments would entail various risks, including the difficulty of integrating thenegatively impact its operations, and personnel of the acquired businesses or products, the potential disruption of our ongoing business and, generally, our potential inability to obtain the desired financial and strategic benefits from the acquisition or investment. The risks associated with assimilation are increased to the extent we acquire businesses that have stand alone operations that cannot easily be integrated or operations or sources of supply outside of the United States and Canada, for which products are manufactured locally by third parties. These factors could harm our financial condition and operating results. Any future acquisitionsresults of operations.  

·

The Company’s reliance on a limited number of suppliers, including sole source suppliers for certain products, could materially and adversely affect its operations and financial results.  

The Company relies on a limited number of suppliers for certain of its commodities and raw materials, including sole source suppliers for certain of its raw materials, packaging, product components, finished products and other necessary supplies. New suppliers may have to be qualified under governmental, industry and Company standards, which can require additional investment and time. The Company may be unable to qualify any needed new suppliers or investmentsmaintain supplier arrangements and relationships; it may be unable to contract with suppliers at the quantity, quality and price levels needed for its business; or certain of the Company’s key suppliers may become insolvent or experience other financial distress. If any of these events occurs and the Company has failed to identify and qualify an alternative vendor, then it may be unable to meet its contractual obligations and customer expectations, which could damage its reputation and result in substantial cash expenditures, the issuance of new equity by uslost customers and sales, or the incurrenceCompany may incur higher than expected expenses, either of additional debtwhich could materially and contingent liabilities. In addition, any potential acquisitions or investments, whether or not ultimately completed, could divert the attentionadversely affect its business, operations and results of management and divert other resources from other matters that are critical to our operations.

operations.

Our condom product line could suffer if the spermicide N-9 is proved or perceived to be harmful.

·

Volatility and increases in the price of raw and packaging materials or energy costs could erode the Company’s profit margins, which could harm operating results, and efforts to hedge against raw material price increases may adversely affect the Company’s operating results if raw material prices decline.

Our distribution of condoms under the TROJAN and other trademarks is regulated by the FDA. Certain of our condoms, and similar condoms sold by our competitors, contain the spermicide nonoxynol-9 (“N-9”). Some interested groups have issued reports that N-9 should not be used rectally or for multiple daily acts of vaginal intercourse. In late 2008, the FDA issued final labeling guidance for latex condoms but excluded N-9 lubricated condoms from the guidance. While we await further FDA guidance on N-9 lubricated condoms we believe that our present labeling for condoms with N-9 is compliant with the overall objectives of the FDA’s guidance, and that condoms with N-9 will remain a viable contraceptive choice for those couples who wish to use them. However, we cannot predict the nature of the labeling that ultimately will be required by the FDA. If the FDA or state governments eventually promulgate rules that prohibit or restrict the use of N-9 in condoms (such as new labeling requirements), we could incur costs from obsolete products, packaging orThe principal raw materials and sales of condoms could decline, which, in turn, could decrease our earnings.

Our operationspackaging used by the Company include surfactants (cleaning agents), paper products and the operations of our third party manufacturersresin-based molded components. Volatility and suppliers may be subject to disruption from events beyond our or their control.

Our operations, as well as the operations of our third party manufacturers and significant suppliers may be subject to disruption from a variety of causes, including work stoppages, financial difficulties, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. If a major disruption were to occur at our operations, it could result in harm to people or the natural environment, delays in shipments of products to customers or suspension of operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Similar consequences may result with regard to disruptionsincreases in the operations of our third party manufacturers or suppliers, some of which could have a material adverse effect upon our business.

Price increases in raw and packaging materials or energy costs could erode our profit margins, which could harm operating results, and efforts to hedge against raw material price increases may adversely affect our operating results if raw material prices decline.

Increases in the prices of raw materials, such as surfactants, which are cleaning agents, palm oil, paper products and bottles, or increases in the costs of energy, costs,shipping and other necessary services, could significantly affect ourthe Company’s profit margins. In particular, duringmargins if it is unable to pass along any higher costs in the past few years, we have experienced extraordinaryform of price increases for rawor otherwise achieve cost efficiencies, such as in manufacturing and packaging materials, diesel fuel and energy. Concerns aboutdistribution. Historically, the adequacy of oil supply, in the face of increasing demand, continued to affect pricing. We use surfactants and bottles in the manufacture and marketing of laundry and household cleaning products. We use paper products for packaging in many of our consumer and specialty chemical products. We use palm oil in certain of our animal nutrition products. We haveCompany has attempted to address thesesuch price increases through cost reduction programs and price increases of our ownits products, entering into pre-buying or locked-in pricing arrangements with certain suppliers and entering into hedge agreements for diesel fuel costs. If raw material price increases continue, we may notagreements. There is no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to fully offset them. Thisany price increases, especially given the competitive environment. In addition, volatility


in certain commodity markets could significantly affect the Company’s production cost and, therefore, harm ourits financial condition and operating results.

We useThe Company uses hedge agreements to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges.prices. The hedge agreements are designed to add stability to our product costs, enabling usthe Company to make pricing decisions and lessen the economic impact of abrupt changes in diesel fuel prices over the term of the contract. However, in periods of declining fuel prices, the hedge agreements can have the effect of increasing our expenditures for fuel.

locking the Company in at above-market prices.

Failure by us or certain of our suppliers to comply with various regulations in the countries which we operate could expose us to enforcement actions or other adverse consequences.

·

If new products and product line extensions do not gain widespread customer acceptance or are otherwise discontinued, or if they cause sales of existing products to decline, the Company’s financial performance could decline.  

The manufacturing, processing, formulation, packaging, labeling,Company’s future performance and growth depends on its ability to successfully develop and introduce new products and product line extensions. The Company cannot be certain that it will achieve its innovation goals. The successful development and introduction of new products involves substantial research, development, marketing and sale of ourpromotional expenditures, which the Company may be unable to recover if the new products are subjectdo not gain widespread market acceptance. New product development and marketing efforts, including efforts to regulation by federal agencies, includingenter markets or product categories in which the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”)Company has limited or no prior experience, have inherent risks. These risks include product development or launch delays, competitor actions, regulatory approval hurdles and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance. In addition, our operations are subject toif sales generated by new products result in a concomitant decline in sales of existing products, the oversight of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Labor Relations Board. Our activities are also regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries in which our products are sold.

In particular, the FDA regulates the safety, manufacturing, labeling and distribution of condoms, home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, battery operated toothbrushes and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals. The FDA also exercises oversight over cosmetic products such as depilatories. In addition, under a memorandum of understanding between the FDA and the FTC, the FTC has jurisdiction with regard to the promotion and advertising of these products, and the FTC regulates the promotion and advertising of our other products as well. As part of its regulatory authority, the FDA may periodically conduct inspections of the physical facilities, machinery, processes and procedures that we use to manufacture regulated products and may observe compliance issues that would require us to make certain changes in our manufacturing facilities and processes. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to regulatory action against the products made in that facility, including seizure, injunction or recall, as well as to possible action against the manufacturer. We may be required to make additional expenditures to address these issues or possibly stop selling certain products until the compliance issue has been remediated. As a result, our businessCompany’s financial performance could be adversely affected.harmed.  

For example, the FDA issued a warning letter to us, dated May 16, 2011 (“Warning Letter”), following an inspection of our Princeton, New Jersey headquarters. The Warning Letter stated that our medical device reporting (“MDR”) procedure does not properly identify all required reportable events. The Warning Letter also criticized our proposals for addressing inadequacies previously identified byCompany has been launching more new products into “white space” categories than it has historically. In 2014, the FDA as to our complaint handling process. In response, we proposed several corrective actions that were accepted byCompany expanded the FDA,OXICLEAN brand into three additional categories: premium laundry detergent, dishwashing detergent and are

engaged in further discussions with the FDA towards resolving the issue relating to our complaint handling process. In addition, partly in response to FDA’s stated concerns, we made product and labeling changes in 2011 and issued a December 2011 safety notice advising consumers about the proper use of SPINBRUSH toothbrushes to avoid injuries associated with improper use of the product.

On February 13, 2012, at the conclusion of an inspection of our Princeton facility, FDA issued a Notice of Inspectional Observations (also known as a “483 report”), containing several observations, including a repeat of an issue identified in a previous 483 report and in the Warning Letter, namely a failure to properly identify all required reportable events.bleach alternatives. In addition, the 483 report addressed inadequacies in proceduresCompany launched new products across almost all of its core businesses including a premium clumping cat litter called ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL, a new premium toothpaste called ARM & HAMMER TRULY RADIANT, a new vitamin line for the VITAFUSION brand, and processes relatednew condoms, vibrators and lubricants under the TROJAN brand. While most of these new products have received strong distribution acceptance from the Company’s retailers to correctivedate, and preventive actions, complaint handling, maintenance of a quality system record, and establishment of records of acceptable suppliers. We are preparing a response to the 483 report and intend to fully cooperate in resolving FDA’s regulatory concerns. On February 16, 2012, the FDA issued a safety communication warning consumers “of serious injuries and potential hazards associated with the use of SPINBRUSH.” We plan to cooperate with the FDA to address the matters raised in the safety communication warning.

Therewill be supported by increased marketing spending, there is no assurance that the FDACompany’s customers and consumers will continue to purchase these new products. If these new products are not take further enforcement actionsuccessful in connectiongaining market share, the Company’s financial results could suffer.

From time to time, the Company has discontinued certain products and product lines, which resulted in returns from customers, asset write-offs and shutdown costs. The Company may suffer similar adverse consequences in the future to the extent it discontinues products that do not meet expectations or no longer satisfy consumer demand.  

·

Reduced availability of transportation or disruptions in our transportation network could adversely affect us.

We distribute our products and receive raw materials and packaging components primarily by truck, rail and ship and through various ports of entry.  Reduced availability of trucking, rail or shipping capacity due to adverse weather conditions, allocation of assets to other industries or geographies or otherwise, work stoppages, strikes or shutdowns of ports of entry or such transportation sources, could cause us to incur unanticipated expenses and impair our ability to distribute our products or receive our raw materials or packaging components in a timely manner, which could disrupt our operations, strain our customer relationships and competitive position, and adversely affect our operating profits.

·

If the reputation of one or more of the Company’s leading brands erodes, its financial results could suffer.  

The Company’s financial success is directly dependent on the reputation and success of its brands, particularly the ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN, L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION brands. The effectiveness of these brands could suffer if the Company’s marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand’s image or its ability to attract consumers. Further, the Company’s results could be adversely affected if one or more of its other leading brands suffers damage to its reputation due to real or perceived quality or safety issues.

Additionally, claims made in the Company’s marketing campaigns may become subject to litigation alleging false advertising, which, if successful, could cause the Company to alter its marketing plans and may materially and adversely affect sales or result in the imposition of significant damages against the Company, or other customer or consumer dissatisfaction, especially if such dissatisfaction were to be broadly disseminated, including through the use of social media.  

Widespread use of social media and networking sites by consumers has greatly increased the speed and accessibility of information dissemination.  Negative or inaccurate posting or comments about the Company in the media or on any social networking website, or the disclosure of non-public sensitive information through social media, could generate adverse publicity that


could damage the reputation of our brands.  In addition, given the association of our individual products with the foregoing matters, or that additional safety notices or recallsCompany, an issue with one of our SPINBRUSHproducts could negatively affect the reputation of our other products, or the Company as a whole, thereby potentially adversely impacting the Company’s financial results.  

·

Product liability claims and withdrawals or recalls could adversely affect the Company’s sales and operating results and brand’s reputation.  

From time to time, the Company is subject to product willliability claims. The Company may be required to pay for losses or injuries actually or purportedly caused by its products, including losses or injuries caused by raw materials or other components provided by third party suppliers that are included in the Company’s products. Claims could be based on allegations that, among other things, the Company’s products contain contaminants, are improperly labeled, or provide inadequate instructions regarding their use or inadequate warnings concerning interactions with other substances. Whether or not successful, product liability claims could result in negative publicity that could harm the Company’s sales and operating results and the reputation of its brands. In addition, if one of the Company’s products is found to be required. Either additional enforcement action,defective or additional safety noticesnon-compliant with applicable rules or recalls, if they wereregulations, it could be required to occur,withdraw or recall it, which could result in adverse publicity and significant expenses. Although the Company maintains product liability and product recall insurance coverage (that also covers product withdrawals), potential product liability claims and withdrawal and recall costs may exceed the amount of insurance coverage or may be excluded under the terms of the policy, which could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, operating results and financial condition results of operations and cash flow..

·

Environmental matters create potential liability risks.  

Likewise, any future determination by the FDA or similar foreign agency that our products or quality systems do not comply with applicable regulations could result in future compliance activities, including product recalls, import detentions, injunctions preventing the shipment of products, or other enforcement actions (and associated adverse publicity) that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Our international operations, including the production of over-the-counter drug products, are subject to regulation in each of the foreign jurisdictions in which we manufacture or market goods. Changes in product standards or manufacturing requirements in any of these jurisdictions could require us to make certain modifications to our operations or product formulations, or to cease manufacturing certain products completely. The effect of the regulatory environment in foreign countries on our over-the-counter and medical devices may affect our ability to market and to make competitive claims for our products. As a result, our international business could be adversely affected.

We are subject to risks related to our international operations that could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our international operations subject us to risks customarily associated with foreign operations, including:

currency fluctuations;

import and export license requirements;

trade restrictions;

changes in tariffs and taxes;

compliance with laws and regulations concerning ethical business practices, including without limitations, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;

restrictions on repatriating foreign profits back to the United States; and

difficulties in staffing and managing international operations.

In all foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, we are subject to laws and regulations that govern foreign investment, foreign trade and currency exchange transactions. These laws and regulations may limit our ability to repatriate cash as dividends or otherwise to the United States and may limit our ability to convert foreign currency cash flow into U.S. dollars. Outside the United States, sales and costs are denominated in a variety of currencies, including the Euro, British pound, Brazilian real, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso, Chinese yuan and Australian dollar. A weakening of the currencies in which sales are generated relative to the currencies in which costs are denominated would decrease operating profits and cash flow.

Environmental matters create potential liability risks.

WeCompany must comply with various environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate,it operates, including those relating to the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and the remediation of contamination associated with the use and disposal of hazardous substances. A release of such substances due to accident or an intentional act could result in substantial liability to governmental authorities or to third parties. We haveThe Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, capital and operating expenditures and other costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations and weregulations. The Company currently areis subject to environmental regulatory proceedings involving ourits Brazilian subsidiary, which has been fined the equivalent of approximately $3$1.9 million (at current exchange rates) in the proceedings.  OurThe Brazilian subsidiary is contesting the fine. In addition, the Company may be required to remove certain landfills in Brazil in connection with these proceedings, the cost of which is estimated to be in the range of $30 million to $50 million. It is possible that wethe Company could become subject to additional environmental liabilities in the future, particularly with respect to our operationits operations in Brazil, that could have a material adverse effect on ourits results of operations or financial condition.

condition.  

·

Current and future laws and regulations in the countries in which the company and its suppliers operate could expose the Company to increased costs and other adverse consequences.  

Product liability claimsThe manufacturing, processing, formulation (including stability), packaging, labeling, marketing, distribution and recalls could adversely affectsale of the Company’s sales and operating results and brand’s reputation.

Weproducts are from time to time, subject to product liability claims. Weregulation by federal agencies, including the FDA, the FTC, the EPA and the CPSC. In addition, the Company’s and its suppliers’ operations are subject to the oversight of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Labor Relations Board. The Company’s activities are also regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries in which its products are sold.  

In particular, the FDA regulates the formulation, safety, manufacturing, packaging, labeling and distribution of condoms, home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, battery operated toothbrushes, over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements, including vitamins and minerals. The FDA also exercises oversight over cosmetic products such as depilatories. In addition, under a memorandum of understanding between the FDA and the FTC, the FTC has jurisdiction with regard to the promotion and advertising of these products, and the FTC regulates the promotion and advertising of the Company’s other products as well. As part of its regulatory authority, the FDA may periodically conduct inspections of the physical facilities, machinery, processes and procedures that the Company and its suppliers use to manufacture regulated products and may identify compliance issues that would require the Company and its suppliers to make certain changes in its manufacturing facilities and processes. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to regulatory action against the products made in that facility, including seizure, injunction or recall, as well as to possible action against the owner of the facility/manufacturer. The Company may be required to pay for lossesmake additional expenditures to address these issues or injuries actually or purportedly caused by our products. Claimspossibly stop selling certain products until the compliance issue has been remediated. As a result, the Company’s business could be adversely affected.

Likewise, any future determination by the FDA or a similar foreign agency, or by the Company in reviewing its compliance with applicable rules and regulations, that the Company’s products or quality systems do not comply with applicable regulations could result in future compliance activities, including product withdrawals or recalls, import detentions, injunctions preventing the shipment of products, or other enforcement actions. For example, the FDA may determine that a particular claim that the Company uses to support the marketing of a product is not substantiated, may not accept the evidence of safety for a new product that the Company may


wish to market, may challenge the safety or effectiveness of existing products based on, allegations that, among other things, our products contain contaminants, providechanges in formulations, inadequate instructions regarding their use,stability or inadequate warnings concerning interactions“shelf-life,” consumer complaints, or improper labeling, and may determine that the Company’s dietary supplement business manufacturing, packaging, labeling and holding operations do not comply with cGMPs. Similarly, the Company may identify these or other substances. Product liability claims and recalls also could resultissues in negative publicity that could harm our sales and operating resultsinternal compliance reviews of its operations and the reputationoperations and products of our brands. In addition, if onevendors and acquired companies. These other issues may include the identification of our products is foundcontaminants or non-compliant levels of particular ingredients. Any of the foregoing could subject the Company to be defective, we could be required to recall it, which could result in adverse publicity, and significant expenses. Although we maintain product liability and product recall insurance coverage, potential product liability claims and recallforce it to incur unanticipated costs may exceed the amount of insurance coverage or may be excluded under the terms of the policy, which couldand have a material adverse effect on ourits business, operatingfinancial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Commission has promulgated final rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and financial condition.

FailureConsumer Protection Act regarding disclosure of the use of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, known as “conflict minerals”, in products manufactured by public companies. Certain of the Company’s products, including its diagnostic test kits and SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes, use these minerals sourced through third parties. The new rules require the Company to effectively utilizeconduct due diligence to determine whether such minerals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo (the DRC) or successfully assert intellectual property rightsan adjoining country and whether such minerals helped finance the armed conflict in the DRC.  The Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including costs to determine the origin of minerals used in its products. In addition, the implementation of these rules could materially adversely affect our competitiveness.the sourcing, supply and pricing of such minerals used in the Company’s products. Also, the Company may face disqualification as a supplier for customers and reputational challenges, or may need to discontinue supply from its suppliers, if its due diligence procedures do not enable it to verify the origins for the minerals used in its products or determine that the minerals are conflict free.

We rely on trademark, trade secret, patentFrom time to time, Congress, the FDA, the FTC, the Commission or other federal, state, local or foreign legislative and copyrightregulatory authorities may impose additional laws or regulations that apply to protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot be surethe Company, repeal laws or regulations that these intellectual property rights will be effectively utilizedthe Company considers favorable, or if necessary, successfully asserted. Thereimpose more stringent interpretations of current laws or regulations. The Company is a risk that we will not be able to obtainpredict the nature of such future laws, regulations, repeals or interpretations or to predict the effect additional governmental regulation, when and perfect our own intellectual property rights, or, where appropriate, license from others intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. We cannot be sure that these rights, if obtained, will not be invalidated, circumvented or challengedit occurs, would have on its business in the future. In addition, even if such rights are obtained in the United States, the lawsSuch developments could require reformulation of somecertain products to meet new standards, recalls or discontinuance of certain products not able to be reformulated, additional record-keeping requirements, increased documentation of the properties of certain products, additional or different labeling, additional scientific substantiation, expanded adverse event reporting or other countries in which our products are or may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights tonew requirements. Any such developments could increase the same extent as the laws of the United States. Our failure to perfect or successfully assert intellectual property rights could make us less competitiveCompany’s costs significantly and could have a material adverse effect on ourits business, financial condition and results of operations.  

·

The Company is subject to risks related to its international operations that could adversely affect its results of operations.  

The Company’s international operations subject it to risks customarily associated with foreign operations, including:

·

currency fluctuations;

·

import and export license and taxation requirements and restrictions;

·

trade restrictions, including local investment or exchange control regulations;

·

changes in tariffs and taxes, the effect of foreign income taxes, value-added taxes and withholding taxes, including the inability to recover amounts owed to the Company by foreign governments, and the determination of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “I.R.S.”) regarding the applicability of certain regulations, including the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, to the Company’s international transactions;

·

the possibility of expropriation, confiscatory taxation or price controls;

·

obstacles to repatriating foreign profits back to the U.S.;

·

political or economic instability, and civil unrest;

·

disruptions in the global transportation network, such as work stoppages, strikes or shutdowns of ports of entry or such other transportation sources, or other labor unrest;

·

compliance with laws and regulations concerning ethical business practices, including without limitation, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and United Kingdom Bribery Act;

·

difficulty in enforcing contractual and intellectual property rights;

·

regulatory requirements for certain products; and

·

difficulties in staffing and managing international operations.  

These risks could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to commercialize its products on a competitive basis in international markets and may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial position.  In all foreign


jurisdictions in which the Company operates, it is subject to laws and regulations that govern foreign investment, foreign trade and currency exchange transactions.  

In addition, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to its sales, profits, assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Outside of the U.S., sales and costs are denominated in a variety of currencies, including the Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound, Brazilian Real, Mexican Peso, Chinese Yuan and Australian Dollar. A weakening of the currencies in which sales are generated relative to the currencies in which costs are denominated would decrease operating profits and cash flow. The Company, from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in the U.S. Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound and Euro.  

·

The Company may not be able to continue to identify and complete strategic acquisitions and effectively integrate acquired companies to achieve desired financial benefits.  

The Company seeks to acquire or invest in businesses that offer products, services or technologies that are complementary. The Company has made nine acquisitions in the past twelve years, including the following brands: SPINBRUSH battery-powered toothbrushes; OXICLEAN, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products; ORAJEL oral analgesics; SIMPLY SALINE nasal moisturizers; FELINE PINE natural cat litter; BATISTE dry shampoo; L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION dietary supplements; REPHRESH and REPLENS feminine care products; and, in January 2015, VI-COR, a manufacturer and seller of feed ingredients for dairy cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock.  

The Company may make additional acquisitions or substantial investments in complementary businesses or products in the future. However, the Company may not be able to identify and successfully negotiate suitable strategic acquisitions at attractive valuations, obtain financing for future acquisitions on satisfactory terms or otherwise complete future acquisitions. In addition, all acquisitions and investments entail various risks, including the difficulty of entering new markets or product categories, the challenges of integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses or products, the potential disruption of the Company’s ongoing business and the ongoing business of the acquired company, the need to review and, if necessary, upgrade processes of the acquired company to conform to the Company’s own processes and applicable legal and regulatory requirements, and, generally, the Company’s potential inability to obtain the desired financial and strategic benefits from the acquisition or investment. Any of these risks may divert management and other resources, require the Company to incur unanticipated costs or delay the anticipated positive impact on the Company’s business and results of the acquisition. The risks associated with assimilation are increased to the extent the Company acquires businesses that have stand-alone operations that cannot easily be integrated or operations or sources of supply outside of the U.S. and Canada, for which products are manufactured locally by third parties. These factors could harm the Company’s financial condition and operating results.  

Acquired companies or operations or newly-created ventures may not be profitable or may not achieve sales levels and profitability that justify the investments made. In addition, future acquisitions or investments could result in substantial cash expenditures, the potentially dilutive issuances of new equity by the Company or the incurrence of additional debt or contingent liabilities, all of which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

We rely significantly on information technology. Any inadequacy, interruption, loss In addition, any potential acquisitions or investments, whether or not ultimately completed, could divert the attention of data, integration failure or security failure ofmanagement and resources from other matters that technology could harm our abilityare critical to effectively operate our business and damage the reputation of our brands.Company’s operations.  

·

The Company relies significantly on information technology.  Any inadequacy, interruption, theft or loss of data, malicious attack, integration failure, failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on our systems or other security failure of that technology could harm the Company’s ability to effectively operate its business and damage the reputation of its brands.  

We relyThe Company relies extensively on information technology systems, some of which are managed by third-party service providers, to interact with internal personnel and customers and suppliers, and other persons.conduct its business. These interactionssystems include, but are not limited to, programs and processes relating to internal communications and communications with other parties, ordering and managing materials from suppliers, converting materials to finished products, shipping product to customers, billing customers and receiving and applying payment, processing transactions, summarizing and reporting results of operations, complying with regulatory, legal or tax requirements, collecting and storing customer, consumer, employee, investor, and other stakeholder information and personal data, and other processes necessary to manage ourthe Company’s business.  OurIn addition, the Company is engaged in limited e-commerce with respect to its TROJAN brand.

Increased information technology security threats and more sophisticated computer crime, including advanced persistent threats, pose a potential risk to the security of the information technology systems, networks, and services of the Company, its customers and other business partners, as well as the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of the data of the Company, its customers and other business partners. As a result, the Company’s information technology systems, networks or service providers could be damaged or cease to function properly or the Company could suffer a loss or disclosure of business, personal or stakeholder information, due to


any number of causes, including catastrophic events, power outages and security breaches. Although we havethe Company has business continuity plans in place and is in process of implementing a breach response plan to address service interruptions, if our business continuitythese plans do not provide effective alternative processes on a timely basis, wethe Company may suffer interruptions in ourits ability to manage or conduct its operations which may adversely affect ourits business.  In addition, we have recently completed information systems upgradesThe Company may need to expend additional resources in the United States and Canada, which affect our ordering, shipping and billing systems in those countries and planfuture to institute similar upgrades in 2012. If the new system does not function properly, our abilitycontinue to order supplies, process and deliver customer orders and process and receive payments for products sold in regions in which we conduct the substantial majority of ourprotect against, or to address problems caused by any business could be limited, which could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows.interruptions or data security breaches.  

Any business interruptions or data security breaches, including cyber security breaches resulting in private data disclosure, could result in lawsuits or regulatory proceedings, damage the Company’s reputation and could alsoor adversely impact ourthe Company’s results of operations and cash flow. Further, negative postingsflows.

·

The Company’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect its operations and financial results and prevent it from fulfilling its obligations, and the Company may incur substantially more debt in the future, which could exacerbate these risks.  

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $1,095 million of total consolidated indebtedness.  This amount of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

·

making it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its cash obligations;

·

limiting the Company’s ability to fund potential acquisitions;

·

requiring the Company to dedicate a portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of cash flow to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

·

limiting the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, general adverse economic conditions or changes in its business and the industry in which it operates; and

·

placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt.

In addition, the Company may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, to repurchase shares or comments about usto fund other activities for general business purposes. If new debt is added to the current debt levels, the related risks that the Company now faces could intensify. Any decision regarding future borrowings will be based on any social networking web site could damage our reputation.

the facts and circumstances existing at the time, including market conditions and the Company’s credit rating.  

·

The Company may not have sufficient cash flow to service its indebtedness or fund capital expenditures.  

Changes in our effective tax rate may adversely affect our earningsThe Company’s ability to repay and refinance its indebtedness and to fund capital expenditures depends primarily on its cash flow. Cash flow is often subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond the Company’s control, and such factors may limit its ability to repay indebtedness and fund capital expenditures. A failure to service its indebtedness or obtain additional financing as needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

·

There can be no guarantee that the Company will continue to make dividend payments or repurchase the Common Stock at sustained levels or at all.

OurAlthough the Board has recently authorized new share repurchase programs and recently increased the amount of the quarterly cash dividends payable on the Common Stock, any Board determinations to continue to repurchase the Common Stock or to continue to pay cash dividends on the Common Stock, in each case at levels consistent with recent practice or at all, will be based primarily upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, business requirements, price of the Common Stock in the case of the repurchase programs, and the Board’s continuing determination that the repurchase programs and the declaration of dividends under the dividend policy are in the best interests of Company stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the repurchase and dividend programs. In the event the Company does not declare a quarterly dividend, or discontinues its share repurchases, its stock price could be adversely affected.


·

Recent volatility in the financial markets may negatively impact the Company’s ability to access the credit markets.

In recent years, the banking system and financial markets have experienced severe disruption, including, among other things, bank failures and consolidations, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades, declines in asset valuations and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  These conditions present the following risks to the Company, among others:

·

The Company is dependent on the continued viability of the financial institutions that participate in the syndicate that is generally obligated to fund the Company’s $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility dated December 19, 2014 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). In addition, the Credit Agreement includes a “commitment increase” feature that enables the Company to increase the amount of its borrowing under the Credit Agreement, subject to lending commitments and certain conditions. Any disruption in the credit markets could limit the availability of credit or the ability or willingness of financial institutions to extend credit, which could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and capital resources.  

·

The Company’s short- and long-term credit ratings affect its borrowing costs and access to financing. A downgrade in the Company’s credit ratings would increase its borrowing costs and could affect its ability to issue commercial paper. Disruptions in the commercial paper market or other effects of volatile economic conditions on the credit market also could raise the Company’s borrowing costs for both short- and long-term debt offerings. Either scenario could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and capital resources.  

Although the Company believes that its operating cash flows, together with its access to the credit markets, provides it with significant discretionary funding capacity, the inability of one or more institutions to fulfill funding obligations under the Credit Agreement could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and operations.  

·

Changes in tax laws and regulations or in the Company’s operations may impact the Company’s effective tax rate and may adversely affect its earnings and cash flow.  

The Company’s future effective tax rate could be affected by changes in tax laws and regulations or their interpretation, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, or changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The realization of deferred income tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If the actual amount of ourthe Company’s future taxable income is less than the amount we areit is currently projecting with respect to specific tax jurisdictions, or if there is a change in the time period within which the deferred tax asset becomes deductible, wethe Company could be required to record a valuation allowance against ourits deferred tax assets. The recording of a valuation allowance would result in an increase in ourthe Company’s effective tax rate, and would have an adverse effect on ourits operating results. In addition, changes in statutory tax rates may change ourthe Company’s deferred tax assets or liability balances, which would have either a favorable or unfavorable impact on ourits effective tax rate.

rate.

Resolutions of tax disputes may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow.

·

Resolutions of tax disputes may adversely affect the Company’s earnings and cash flow.  

Significant judgment is required in determining ourthe Company’s effective tax rate and in evaluating ourits tax positions. We provideThe Company provides for uncertain tax positions with respect to tax positions that do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards mandated by applicable accounting guidance. ChangesFluctuations in federal, state, local and foreign taxes or changes to uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, may impact ourthe Company’s effective tax rate. Whenrate and its financial results. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities, and although the Company believes its tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation could be materially different than that reflected in its historical income tax provisions and accruals. In addition, when particular tax matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduction to ourthe Company’s effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable resolution of any tax matter could increase the effective tax rate. Any resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution.

resolution.  

·

Failure to effectively utilize or successfully assert intellectual property rights, and the loss or expiration of such rights, could materially adversely affect the Company’s competitiveness.  Infringement by the Company of third-party intellectual property rights could result in costly litigation and/or the modification or discontinuance of Company products.  

The market for the Company’s products depends to a significant extent upon the value associated with its trademarks and brand names, including ARM & HAMMER, TROJAN, OXICLEAN, L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION. The Company owns the material trademarks and brand names used in connection with the marketing and distribution of its major products both in the U.S. and in other countries. In addition, the Company holds several valuable patents on its products, which the Company believes serve as an effective barrier to entry for new competitors. Accordingly, the Company relies on trademark, trade secret, patent and copyright laws to protect its intellectual property rights. Although most of the Company’s material intellectual property is registered in the U.S. and


in certain foreign countries in which it operates, it cannot be sure that its intellectual property rights will be effectively utilized or, if necessary, successfully asserted. There can be no guaranteeis a risk that the Company will continue to make dividend payments or repurchase its stock.

Although the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program and recently increased the amount of its quarterly cash dividends payable on its Common Stock, any determinations by the

Company to continue to repurchase its Common Stock or by the Board of Directors to continue to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock will be based primarily upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, business requirements, price of its Common Stock in the case of the repurchase program, and Board of Directors’ continuing determination that the repurchase program and the declaration of dividends under the dividend policy are in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the repurchase and dividend programs.

We may not be able to attract, retainobtain and developperfect its own intellectual property rights, or, where appropriate, license from others intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. The Company cannot be sure that these rights, if obtained, will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the future, and the Company could incur significant costs in connection with legal actions relating to such rights. In addition, even if such rights are obtained in the U.S., the laws of some of the other countries in which the Company’s products are or may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. If other parties infringe the Company’s intellectual property rights, they may dilute the value of the Company’s brands in the marketplace, which could diminish the value that consumers associate with the Company’s brands and harm its sales. The Company’s failure to perfect or successfully assert intellectual property rights could make it less competitive and could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and financial condition. Also, the Company’s patents are granted for a term of 20 years from the date the patent application is filed. While the Company considers no single patent to be material to the business as a whole, it does recognize that the loss of key personnel.patents will allow for increased competition, specifically to its SPINBRUSH battery-powered toothbrush, FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kit and ANSWER pregnancy test kit brands. While the Company has obtained and is seeking patent protection for improvements made in these product areas, the Company cannot provide assurance that its patents on such improvements will offer the same level of protection from competition as the patents that are nearing the end of their 20 year terms and expiring.

In addition, if the Company’s products are found to infringe intellectual property rights of others, the owners of those rights could bring legal actions against the Company claiming substantial damages for past infringement and seeking to enjoin manufacturing and marketing of the affected products. If these legal actions are successful, in addition to any potential liability for damages from past infringement, the Company could be required to obtain a license in order to continue to manufacture or market the affected products, potentially adding significant costs. The Company might not prevail in any action brought against it or it may be unsuccessful in securing any license for continued use and therefore have to discontinue the marketing and sale of a product. This could make the Company less competitive and could have a material adverse impact on its business, operating results and financial condition.

·

Impairment of the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets may result in a reduction in net income.

OurThe Company has a material amount of goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets, as well as other long-lived assets, which are periodically evaluated for impairment in accordance with current accounting standards. Declines in the Company’s profitability and/or estimated cash flows related to specific intangible assets, as well as potential changes in market valuations for similar assets and market discount rates, has resulted in impairment charges from time to time, and may result in future impairment charges, which could reduce the Company’s net income and otherwise have an adverse impact on operating results.  In 2014, the results of the Company’s annual impairment test for indefinite lived trade names resulted in a personal care trade name whose fair value exceeded its carrying value by 11%.  This trade name is valued at approximately $37 million and is considered an important asset to the Company.  The Company continues to monitor performance and should there be any significant change in forecasted assumptions or estimates, including sales, profitability and discount rate, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment charge.

·

The Company’s operations and the operations of its third party manufacturers, suppliers and customers may be subject to disruption from events beyond its or their control.  

The Company’s operations, as well as the operations of its third party manufacturers, suppliers and customers, may be subject to disruption from a variety of causes, including work stoppages, material shortages, financial difficulties, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. If a major disruption were to occur, it could result in harm to people or the natural environment, delays in shipments of products to customers or suspension of operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.  

·

The Company may not be able to attract, retain and develop key personnel.  

The Company’s future performance depends in significant part upon the continued service of ourits executive officers and other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. This effect could be exacerbated if any officers or other key personnel left as a group. Ourgroup or at the same time. The Company’s success also depends, in part, on ourits continuing ability to attract, retain and develop highly qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that wethe Company can retain ourits key employees or attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.future.  

 

ITEMITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

 


ITEMITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

PROPERTIES

The Company leases a 250,000 square foot building in Ewing, New Jersey for its global corporate headquarters. The lease expires in 2032, subject to two ten-year extension terms at the option of the Company. The Company’s executive offices and primaryaggregate lease commitment is approximately $116 million over the lease term.  

In addition, the Company owns a 127,000 square feet facility in Princeton, New Jersey which is occupied by the Company’s research and development facilities are owned by the Company and are located on 22 acres of land in Princeton, New Jersey. These facilities include approximately 127,000 square feet of office and laboratory space.SPD personnel. The Company also owns a 36,000 square foot research and development facility in Cranbury, New Jersey. In addition, the Company leases space in three buildings adjacent to its Princeton facility that contain approximately 140,000 square feet of office space under three leases, of which two expire in 2014, and the other expires in 2022. Jersey.  

The Company also leases regional sales offices in various locations throughout the United States, BrazilU.S. and China.

On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a 20 year lease for a new corporate headquarters building that will be constructed in Ewing, New Jersey (approximately 10 miles from the Company’s existing corporate headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey) to meet office space needs for the foreseeable future. Based on current expectations that the facility will be completed and occupied beginning in early 2013, the lease will expire in 2033. The Company’s lease commitment is approximately $116 million over the lease term. In conjunction with its lease of the new headquarters building, which will consist of approximately 250,000 square feet, the Company will be vacating the three leased facilities in Princeton.

globally.  The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries also own or lease other facilities as set forth in the following table:

 

Location

Products Manufactured

Segment

Approximate

Area (Sq.  Feet)

LocationOwned:

Products Manufactured

Approximate
Area (Sq.  Feet)

Owned:Manufacturing facilities

Manufacturing facilities

York, Pennsylvania

Liquid laundry detergent and cat litter

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

450,000

450,000

Harrisonville, Missouri

Liquid laundry detergent and fabric softener

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

360,000

272,000

Green River, Wyoming

Sodium bicarbonate and various consumer products

Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD

273,000

250,000

Lakewood, New Jersey

Various consumer products

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

250,000

250,000

Colonial Heights, Virginia

Condoms

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

220,000

220,000

Old Fort, Ohio

Sodium bicarbonate, rumen bypass fats and various

consumer products

208,000

Location

Products ManufacturedConsumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD

Approximate
Area (Sq.  Feet)

208,000

Montreal, Canada

Personal care products

Consumer International

157,000

157,000

Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil

Sodium bicarbonate and other products

SPD

120,000

120,000

Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil((1)1)

SPD

106,000

106,000

Folkestone, England

Personal care products

Consumer International

78,000

78,000

Madera, California

Rumen bypass fats and related products

SPD

50,000

50,000

Itapura, Bahia, Brazil

Barite

SPD

35,000

35,000

New Plymouth, New Zealand(2)

Condom processing

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

31,000

31,000

Oskaloosa, Iowa

Animal nutrition products

SPD

27,000

27,000

Warehouses

Warehouses

York, Pennsylvania

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

650,000

650,000

Harrisonville, Missouri

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

150,000

282,000

Green River, Wyoming

Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD

101,000

215,000

Old Fort, Ohio

Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD

90,000

Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil

SPD

39,200

39,200

Itapura, Bahia, Brazil

SPD

19,600

19,600

Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil

SPD

13,100

13,100

Leased:

Manufacturing facilitiesLeased:

Manufacturing facilities

North Brunswick, New Jersey(23)

360,000

360,000


Vancouver, Washington(4)

Dietary supplements

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

206,000

Victorville, California(35)

Liquid laundry detergent and cat litter

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

150,000

150,000

Mason City, Iowa(6)

Animal nutrition products

SPD

36,000

Folkestone, England(47)

Personal care products

Consumer International

21,500

22,000

Warehouses

Warehouses

Fostoria, Ohio(8)

Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD

125,000

486,000

Victorville, California(5)

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

300,000

Grandview, Missouri(9)

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

304,000

250,000

Mississauga, CanadaRidgefield, Washington(54)

Consumer Domestic and Consumer International

123,000

190,000

Victorville, CaliforniaMississauga, Canada(310)

Consumer International

300,000

123,000

Barcelona, SpainMason City, Iowa((6)6)

SPD

20,000

64,000

Folkestone, England(7)(11)

Consumer International

45,600

55,000

Revel, France

Consumer International

35,500

48,900

Offices(14)

Mexico City, Mexico

27,500

Sydney, Australia

24,900

Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil

21,700

Atlanta, Georgia

23,071

OfficesConsumer International

Barcelona, Spain(6)

85,000

27,500

Levallois, France

Consumer International

21,600

21,600

Mississauga, Canada

Consumer International

17,000

17,000

Folkestone, England(812)

Consumer International

11,000

11,000

Dover, EnglandSydney, Australia(13)

Consumer International

9,400

24,900

 

(1)

Manufacturing site is idle.idle, and virtually all equipment has now been removed.

(2)

Land lease expires in March 2025.

(3)

Lease expires in September 2015.  The Company has subleased this building until July 2012.through the end of the lease term.  

(3)

(4)

There are a total of seven buildings in Vancouver, Washington and one building in Ridgefield, Washington dedicated to the Company’s dietary supplements business.  All leases have an expiration date of December 2020, except for Ridgefield (March 2018, subject to a 33-month extension at the option of the Company) and two buildings in Vancouver (August 2017, subject to a three-year extension at the option of the Company, and December 2015, respectively).

(5)

Lease expires in April 2024, subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company.

(4)

(6)

There are three buildings in Mason City, Iowa dedicated to the Company’s animal nutrition business.  One lease, for two buildings, has an expiration date of November 2019, subject to three five-year extensions at the option of the Company.  The lease for the other building has an expiration date of November 2024, subject to two five- year extensions at the option of the Company.

(7)

Lease expires in April 2017,2022, subject to review every five years.a break option in 2017.

(5)

(8)

Lease expires in November 2015, subject to one four-year extension at the option of the Company.  

(9)

Lease consists of two suites (each approximately 125,000 sq. feet).  One suite expires in May 2015 and the other in May 2016.  The lease is subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company.  

(10)

Lease expires in September 2022, subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company.

(6)

(11)

In Barcelona, Spain, the Company leases an 85,000 square foot facility

There are two leased warehouses in which manufacturing operations ceased in 2006. TheFolkestone, England.  One lease expires in November 2012. The Company has subleased 57,000 square feet of the plant to a third party.

(7)Lease expires in March 2022,2028, with break options every eightfive years.  The second lease expires in April 2022, subject to a break option in April 2017.

(8)

(12)

Lease expires in November 2024, withsubject to a break options every seven years.option in December 2020.

(13)

Lease expires in June 2020, subject to a six-year extension at the option of the Company.

(14)

We also lease offices in Brazil and China.

In Syracuse, New York, the Company owns a 21 acre site which includes a group of connected buildings.  This facility was closed in 2001 and a portion of the facility is now leased to a third party.

Armand, Products Company, a joint venture in which the Company owns a 50% interest, operates a potassium carbonate manufacturing plant located in Muscle Shoals, Alabama.  This facility contains approximately 53,000 square feet of space and has a production capacity of 103,000 tons of potassium carbonate per year.


The Company’s 99.2% owned Brazilian subsidiary QGN, has its administrative headquarters in Rio de Janeiro.Janeiro, Brazil.

The Old Fort, Ohio plant has a production capacity for sodium bicarbonate of 280,000 tons per year.  The Green River, Wyoming plant has a production capacity for sodium bicarbonate of 200,000 tons per year.

The Company believes that its operating and administrative facilities are adequate and suitable for the conduct of its business. The Company also believes that its production facilities are suitable for current manufacturing requirements for its consumer and specialty products businesses. In addition, with the exception of gummy dietary supplements, the facilities possess a capacity sufficient to accommodate the Company’s estimated increases in production requirements over the next several years, based on its current product lines. The Company is currently expanding its gummy dietary supplements production capacity at its York, Pennsylvania manufacturing facility to meet expected future product demand. The new gummy dietary supplements line is expected to start production in the first quarter of 2015.

 

ITEMITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

General

The Company, in the ordinary course of its business is the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, government investigations and proceedings from time to time, including, without limitation, those relating to, commercial transactions, product liability, purported consumer class actions, employment matters, antitrust, environmental, health, safety and other compliance related matters.  Such proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of certain pending or threatened legal actions may not be reasonably predictable and any related damages may not be estimable.  Certain legal actions, including those described below, could result in an adverse outcome for the Company, and any such adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Brazil Environmental Matters

In 2000, the Company acquired majority ownership in its Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral Dodo Nordeste S.A. (“QGN”). The acquired operations included an inorganic salt manufacturing plant which began site operations in the late 1970’s. Located on the site were two closed landfills, two active landfills and a pond for the management of the process waste streams. In 2009, QGN was advised by the environmental authoritiesauthority in the State of Bahia, the Institute of the Environment (“IMA”), that the plant was discharging contaminants into an adjacent creek. After learning of the discharge, QGN took immediate action to cease the discharge and retained two nationally recognized environmental firms to prepare a site investigation / remedial action plan (“SI/RA”). The SI/RA report was submitted by QGN to IMA in April 2010. The report concluded that the likely sources of the discharge were the failure of the pond and closed landfills. QGN ceased site operations in August 2010. In November 2010, IMA responded to QGN’s recommendation for an additional study by issuing a notification requiring a broad range of remediation measures (the “Remediation Notification”), which included the shutdown and removal of two on-site landfills. In addition, notwithstandingdespite repeated discussions with IMA at QGN’s request to consider QGN’s proposed remediation alternatives, in December 2010, IMA imposed a fine of five million realsBrazilian Real (approximately $3 million)U.S. $1.9 million at current exchange rates) for the discharge of contaminants above allowable limits. The description of the basis for the fine included a reference to aggravating factors whichthat may indicate that local “management’s intent” was considered in determining the severity of the fine.fine, which could result in criminal liability for members of local management. In January 2011, QGN filed with IMA an administrative defense to the fine.fine, suspending any enforcement activities pending its defense. IMA has not yet formally responded to QGN’s administrative defense.defense.

With respect to the Remediation Notification, QGN engaged in discussions with IMA during which QGN asserted that a number of the remediation measures, including the removal of the landfills, and the timeframes for implementation were not appropriate and requested that the Remediation Notification be withdrawn. In response, in February 2011, IMA issued a revised Remediation Notification (the “Revised Remediation Notification”) providing for further site analysis by QGN, including further study of the integrity of the landfills. The revisedRevised Remediation NoticeNotification did not include a requirement to remove the landfills.landfills; however, it did not foreclose the possibility of such requirement. QGN has responded to the revisedRevised Remediation Notification providing further information regarding the remediation measures, and intends to continueis in discussions with the Institute of Environment and Waste Management (“INEMA”), successor to IMA, to seek agreement on an appropriate remediation plan. In mid 2011,mid-2011, QGN, consistent with the revisedRevised Remediation Notice, began an additional site investigation and capped the two active landfills with an impervious synthetic coverlandfills. In 2012, QGN drained the waste pond. During the third quarter of 2013, INEMA approved, in writing, the first step in QGN’s proposed remediation plans, the installation of a trench drain to capture and initiatedtreat groundwater at the closuresite. Construction of the pond. However, discussions are continuingtrench drain began during the first quarter of 2014 and is expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2015. In June 2014, QGN formally submitted to INEMA a technical report, including a remediation plan for the site and a proposed agreement regarding the fine and QGN’s ongoing obligations at the site. In July 2014, an initial meeting was held with INEMA concerningto review and discuss the potential removal ofreport and the landfills.proposed


agreement. Following the initial meeting, QGN provided additional information requested by INEMA and continues to engage in discussions with INEMA regarding the proposed agreement.

As a result of the foregoing events, the Company accrued approximately $3$3.0 million in 2009 and an additional $4.8 million in 2010 for remediation, fines and related costs. Since 2009, the costs of remediation activities and foreign exchange rate changes have reduced the accrual by approximately $4.7 million, to a current amount of $3.1 million. As a result of December 31, 2011, $1.7 million has been spent on the remediation activities. If INEMA requires the removalINEMA’s approval of the landfills and, iffirst step in QGN’s remediation plans, the Company isdoes not believe that it will be required to remove the landfills. However, it remains reasonably possible that INEMA will require such removal, and the Company could be unsuccessful in appealing such decision,decision. The Company estimates the cost of such landfill removal would be in the range of $30 million to $50 million.

ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant Litigation  

The Company has been named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit alleging unfair, deceptive and unlawful business practices with respect to the advertising, marketing and sales of ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant. Specifically, on March 9, 2012, Plaintiffs Stephen Trewin and Joseph Farhatt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed a complaint against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Company used labeling and a marketing and advertising campaign centered around the claim that the ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant is a “natural” product that contains “natural” ingredients and provides “natural” protection. The complaint alleged that the claim was false and misleading because the product contains artificial and synthetic ingredients. Among other things, the complaint sought an order certifying the case as a class action, appointing Plaintiffs as class representatives and appointing Plaintiffs’ counsel to represent the class. The complaint also sought restitution and disgorgement of all amounts obtained by the Company as a result of the alleged misconduct; compensatory, actual, statutory and other unspecified damages allegedly suffered by Plaintiffs and the purported class; treble damages for alleged violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act; punitive damages for alleged violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act; an order requiring the Company to immediately cease its alleged wrongful conduct; an order requiring the Company to engage in a corrective notice campaign; an order requiring the Company to pay to Plaintiffs and all members of the purported class the amounts paid for ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant; statutory prejudgment and post-judgment interest; and, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

In January 2014, the case was settled for an immaterial amount, and the settlement was granted preliminary approval by the Court in February 2015.  A final approval hearing regarding the settlement is scheduled for June 4, 2015. If the Court fails to approve the settlement, the Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter. While it is not currently possible to estimate the amount of any damages or determine the impact of any equitable relief that may be granted if the litigation continues and if there is an adverse outcome, such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

flowsAntitrust Matters.

In June 2009, the Company received a subpoena and civil investigative demand from the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in connection with a non-public investigation in which the FTC is seeking to determine if the Company has engaged or is engaging in any unfair methods of competition with respect to the distribution and sale of condoms in the United States through potentially exclusionary practices. The Company believes that its distribution and sales practices involving the sale of condoms are in full compliance with applicable law.

The FTC investigation arose out of allegations raised by Mayer Laboratories, Inc. (“Mayer Labs”), a California based condom business competitor whose principal brand of condoms has a U.S. market share of less than one percent. On November 21, 2008, following the Company’s receipt of correspondence from counsel for Mayer Labs threatening litigation related to the Company’s condom sales and marketing practices, the Company commenced a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking a ruling that the Company’s condom sales and marketing practices are legal. The case subsequently was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

In the litigation, Mayer Labs alleges, among other things, that the Company’s long standing shelf space program under which a retail store chain allocates a percentage of shelf space to the Company’s products in exchange for price rebates, other sales and marketing practices through which the Company allegedly attempted to influence the brand mix and shelf placement of condoms in certain retail stores, and other alleged anti-competitive activities violated federal and state antitrust laws, and that the Company tortiously interfered with an alleged exclusive business arrangement between Mayer Labs and its supplier. Mayer Labs generally seeks an order declaring the Company’s sales and marketing practices related to shelf space allocation for condoms to be illegal, monetary damages and trebling of certain of the damages, disgorgement of profits, injunctive relief, and recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

On January 6, 2012, Mayer Labs’ served an expert’s report indicating that it is seeking damages of between $2.6 million and $3.1 million and trebling of those damages. At this point, it is not possible to estimate the amount of any additional alleged damage claims Mayer Labs may make.

On the same date, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to Mayer Labs’ claims, which was argued before the court on February 10, 2012. If the Company’s motion for summary judgment is denied, the matter is scheduled to proceed to trial on April 2, 2012.

Mayer Labs filed a motion for sanctions on February 7, 2012, against the Company, which the Company believes are unjustified and is vigorously contesting. The motion is based on the deletion of emails allegedly relevant to the litigation by James R. Craigie, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and the claim that the Company allegedly failed to make a reasonable and good faith effort to recover certain of the deleted emails. Although the Company believes that it has been able to retrieve substantially all of the deleted emails, the sanctions sought by Mayer Labs include the dismissal of the Company’s claims against Mayer Labs; a default judgment against the Company with respect to Mayer Labs’ claims against the Company or, alternatively, an adverse inference that the deleted documents would have supported Mayer’s claims; an instruction that the Company notify parties opposing the Company in other previous and pending lawsuits if the Company has violated its obligation to preserve documents related to those lawsuits; preclusion of the Company from introducing any email evidence to or from its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and payment of attorneys fees.

As noted above with respect to the FTC investigation and the Mayer Labs litigation, the Company believes that its condom sales and marketing practices are in full compliance with applicable law. Moreover, the Company intends to vigorously defend against Mayer Labs’ allegations. However, these matters are subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of investigations and litigation matters is not predictable with assurance. An adverse outcome in any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, an adverse outcome with regard to Mayer Labs’ motion for sanctions could have a material adverse effect on the outcome of the FTC investigation and the Mayer Labs litigation, and might adversely affect the Company with regard to other litigation.

Home Pregnancy and Ovulation Test Kit Litigation

The Company is engaged in disputes with SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH (“SPD”), primarily regarding each company’s advertising claims for home pregnancy and ovulation test kits.

On January 22, 2009, SPD filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey was granted in April 2009. On January 15, 2010, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory relief against SPD, also in the New Jersey District Court, and in response SPD filed counterclaims against the Company. Each company’s initial and subsequent claims against the other have been consolidated before that Court. The parties are currently in discovery. No trial date has been set.

Essentially, SPD alleges that the Company uses false and misleading advertising and competes unfairly with respect to its FIRST RESPONSE digital and analog home pregnancy and analog ovulation test kits in violation of the Lanham Act and related state laws. SPD’s allegations are principally directed to claims included in advertising to the effect that the Company’s digital FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kits can detect the pregnancy hormone five days before a woman’s missed menstrual period and that its analog FIRST RESPONSE Early Result Pregnancy Test (the “6-Day Product”) detects the pregnancy hormone six days before a woman’s missed menstrual period. SPD seeks an order to enjoin the Company from making those claims and to remove all such advertising from the marketplace, unspecified damages, trebling of those damages, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

The Company has denied all of SPD’s allegations and has asserted that the Food and Drug Administration has cleared the FIRST RESPONSE digital pregnancy test and analog pregnancy test for use 5 and 6 days, respectively, before a woman’s missed menstrual period. In addition, the Company asserts claims of false and misleading advertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and related state laws with respect to certain of SPD’s advertising claims for its ClearBlue Easy home pregnancy test kit and ovulation detection products. The Company seeks an order to enjoin SPD from making those claims and to remove all such advertising from the marketplace, unspecified damages, enhancement of those damages, costs of the action and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Company also seeks a judicial declaration that certain statements on the package for the 6-Day Product (namely, the statement that the 6-Day Product can detect the pregnancy hormone up to six days before a woman’s missed period and the statement that, in clinical testing, the 6-Day Product detected pregnancy in 68% of the tested urine samples of pregnant women taken six days before the date of missed period), as well as substantively identical advertising statements that the Company intended to publish in other media, are not actionable. In response, SPD denied all of the Company’s allegations and asserted counterclaims with respect to the 6-Day Product summarized above.

The Company intends to vigorously pursue its claims and defenses against SPD. However, this matter is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of litigation is not predictable with assurance. An adverse outcome in this matter could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

General

The Company, in the ordinary course of its business, is the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

 

ITEMITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

 



PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

  2011   2010 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Common Stock Price Range and Dividends

  Low   High   Dividend   Low   High   Dividend 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Dividend

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Dividend

 

1st Quarter

  $33.83    $40.59    $0.17    $29.54    $34.68    $0.07  

 

$

61.00

 

 

$

69.44

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

53.80

 

 

$

64.69

 

 

$

0.28

 

2nd Quarter

  $38.88    $42.37    $0.17    $30.99    $34.98    $0.07  

 

$

67.05

 

 

$

70.49

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

58.91

 

 

$

65.10

 

 

$

0.28

 

3rd Quarter

  $36.78    $46.29    $0.17    $29.72    $33.92    $0.085  

 

$

63.85

 

 

$

70.87

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

56.36

 

 

$

65.49

 

 

$

0.28

 

4th Quarter

  $42.00    $46.45    $0.17    $32.00    $35.50    $0.085  

 

$

67.04

 

 

$

80.97

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

59.00

 

 

$

66.96

 

 

$

0.28

 

Full Year

  $33.83    $46.45    $0.68    $29.54    $35.50    $0.31  

 

$

61.00

 

 

$

80.97

 

 

$

1.24

 

 

$

53.80

 

 

$

66.96

 

 

$

1.12

 

Based on composite trades reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

Applicable stock price ranges have been restated to reflectExchange and dividends paid for each fiscal quarter for the Company’s 2-for-1 stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend on June 1, 2011.years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Approximate number of record holders of Church & Dwight’sthe Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2011: 1,7002014: 1,900.

The following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the CompanyCompany’s Common Stock for the past five fiscal years with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Household Products Index described more fully below.  The returns are indexed to a value of $100 at December 31, 2006.2009.  Dividend reinvestment has been assumed.

Comparison of Cumulative Five-Year Total Return among Company, S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Household Products Index((1)1)

      INDEXED RETURNS (Years Ending) 

Company / Index

  2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011 

  

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

   100.00     127.55     133.16     144.65     166.75     224.73  

  

S&P 500 Index

   100.00     105.49     66.46     84.05     96.71     98.76  

  

S&P 500 Household Products Index

   100.00     115.63     99.53     106.32     113.95     125.67  

(1)

S&P 500 Household Products Index consists of THE CLOROX COMPANY, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY.P&G.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDEXED RETURNS (Years ending)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company / Index

 

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

 

100.00

115.28

155.36

185.33

233.44

282.70

S&P 500 Index

 

100.00

115.06

117.49

136.29

180.42

205.10

S&P 500 Household Products Index

 

100.00

107.18

118.21

128.58

160.81

184.37



Share Repurchase Authorization

On August 4, 2011,January 29, 2014, the Company’s board of directors (“the Board”) authorized a new share repurchase program, under which the Company announced that the Board of Directorswas authorized theto repurchase of up to $300$500 million in shares of Common Stock (the “2014 Share Repurchase Program”), and an evergreen share repurchase program under which the Company’s Common Stock. Any purchasesCompany may be maderepurchase, from time to time, Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans.  The 2014 Share Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s share repurchase program announced on November 5, 2012.

As part of the evergreen share repurchase program, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, subject to market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. There is no expiration date on the stock repurchase authorization, andearly January 2015, the Company is not obligated to acquire any specific numberpurchased 0.5 million shares of shares. The Company purchased 1.8 million sharesCommon Stock at a cost of $80.1approximately $41.2 million.  The Company used cash on hand to fund the purchase price.

On January 28, 2015, the Board authorized a new share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $500 million in shares of Common Stock (the “2015 Share Repurchase Program”).  The 2015 Share Repurchase Program replaced the fourth quarter2014 Share Repurchase Program and the Company continued its evergreen share repurchase program.  

As part of 2011.the 2015 Share Repurchase Program and the evergreen share repurchase program, in early February 2015, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase contract with a commercial bank to purchase $215 million of Common Stock.  The Company paid $215 million to the bank and received an initial delivery of approximately 2.6 million shares of Common Stock. The contract will be settled by mid-May 2015.  If the Company is required to deliver value to the bank at the end of the purchase period, the Company, at its option, may elect to settle in shares of Common Stock or cash.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESOf the 2015 share repurchases, approximately $88.0 million was purchased under the Company’s evergreen share repurchase program.

 

Period

  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price  Paid
per
Share(1)
   Total Amount
of Purchase
Under the
Program
   Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Program
 

10/01/2011 to 10/28/2011

   692,078    $44.31    $30,666,736    $269,333,564  

10/29/2011 to 11/25/2011

   797,010    $43.84    $34,942,356    $234,390,908  

11/26/2011 to 12/31/2011

   330,165    $43.75    $14,445,448    $219,945,460  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total purchase in 2011

   1,819,253    $44.00    $80,054,540    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period

 

Total

Number of

Shares

Purchased

 

Average

Price Paid

per Share

 

Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Plans

or Programs

 

Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet Be Purchased Under All

Programs as of

December 31, 2014

12/1/2014 to 12/31/2014

 

560,499

 

$            78.11

 

560,499

 

$         107,200,000

Total

 

560,499

 

$            78.11

 

560,499

 

 

 



(1)

ITEM 6.

Average price paid per share includes commissions.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included in this report.Annual Report.  The selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods presented have been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FIVE-YEARFIVE‑YEAR FINANCIAL REVIEW

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)data and employees)

 

 

2014 (1)

 

 

2013 (1)

 

 

2012 (1)

 

 

2011 (1)

 

 

2010 (1)

 

(In millions except per share data and employees)

  2011(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 2008(1) 2007(1) 

Operating Results

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

  $2,749.3   $2,589.2    2,520.9    2,422.4    2,220.9  

 

$

3,297.6

 

 

 

3,194.3

 

 

 

2,921.9

 

 

 

2,749.3

 

 

 

2,589.2

 

Marketing

  $354.1    338.0    353.6    294.1    256.7  

Research & Development

  $55.1    53.7    55.1    51.2    49.8  

Income from Operations(2,3,4,6)

  $492.6    445.0    412.9    340.3    305.0  

Marketing expenses

 

$

416.9

 

 

 

399.8

 

 

 

357.3

 

 

 

354.1

 

 

 

338.0

 

Research and development expenses

 

$

59.8

 

 

 

61.8

 

 

 

54.8

 

 

 

55.1

 

 

 

53.7

 

Income from Operations(2,3)

 

$

641.2

 

 

 

622.2

 

 

 

545.1

 

 

 

492.6

 

 

 

445.0

 

% of Sales

   17.9  17.2  16.4  14.1  13.7

 

 

19.4

%

 

 

19.5

%

 

 

18.7

%

 

 

17.9

%

 

 

17.2

%

Net Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.(2,3,6)

  $309.6    270.7    243.5    195.2    169.0  

Net Income per Share-Basic(6)

  $2.16    1.91    1.73    1.44    1.29  

Net Income per Share-Diluted(6)

  $2.12    1.87    1.70    1.39    1.23  

Net Income (2,3,5)

 

$

413.9

 

 

 

394.4

 

 

 

349.8

 

 

 

309.6

 

 

 

270.7

 

Net Income per Share-Basic (5)

 

$

3.06

 

 

 

2.85

 

 

 

2.50

 

 

 

2.16

 

 

 

1.91

 

Net Income per Share-Diluted (5)

 

$

3.01

 

 

 

2.79

 

 

 

2.45

 

 

 

2.12

 

 

 

1.87

 

Financial Position

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

  $3,117.6    2,945.2    3,118.4    2,801.4    2,532.5  

 

$

4,381.3

 

 

 

4,259.7

 

 

 

4,098.1

 

 

 

3,117.6

 

 

 

2,945.2

 

Total Debt(4)

  $252.3    339.7    816.3    856.1    856.0  

Total Stockholders’ Equity

  $2,040.8    1,870.9    1,601.8    1,331.7    1,080.5  

Total Debt (3)

 

$

1,095.2

 

 

 

803.3

 

 

 

903.2

 

 

 

252.3

 

 

 

339.7

 

Total Stockholders' Equity

 

$

2,101.9

 

 

 

2,300.0

 

 

 

2,061.1

 

 

 

2,040.8

 

 

 

1,870.9

 

Total Debt as a % of Total Capitalization

   11  15  34  39  44

 

 

34

%

 

 

26

%

 

 

30

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

15

%

Other Data

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Common Shares Outstanding-Basic

   143.2    142.0    140.8    135.7    131.7  

 

 

135.1

 

 

 

138.6

 

 

 

140.1

 

 

 

143.2

 

 

 

142.0

 

Cash Dividends Paid

  $97.4    44.0    32.3    23.1    19.7  

 

$

167.5

 

 

 

155.2

 

 

 

134.5

 

 

 

97.4

 

 

 

44.0

 

Cash Dividends Paid per Common Share

  $0.68    0.31    0.23    0.17    0.15  

 

$

1.24

 

 

 

1.12

 

 

 

0.96

 

 

 

0.68

 

 

 

0.31

 

Stockholders’ Equity per Common Share

  $14.25    13.17    11.38    9.81    8.20  

Additions to Property, Plant & Equipment(5)

  $76.6    63.8    135.4    98.3    48.9  

Stockholders' Equity per Common Share

 

$

15.56

 

 

 

16.59

 

 

 

14.71

 

 

 

14.25

 

 

 

13.17

 

Additions to Property, Plant & Equipment (4)

 

$

70.5

 

 

 

67.1

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

63.8

 

Depreciation & Amortization

  $77.1    71.6    85.4    71.4    56.7  

 

$

91.2

 

 

 

90.5

 

 

 

85.0

 

 

 

77.1

 

 

 

71.6

 

Employees at Year-End

   3,457    3,543    3,664    3,530    3,682  

 

 

4,145

 

 

 

4,177

 

 

 

4,354

 

 

 

3,457

 

 

 

3,543

 

 

(1)

Period to period comparisons of the data presented above are impacted by the effect of acquisitions and divestitures made by the Company, and a two-for-one stock split in 2011 effected in the form of a stock dividend.Company.  For further explanation of the impact of the acquisitions occurring in 20112012 and 2010,2011, refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements and for the impact of divestitures occurring in 2010 refer to Note 9 of such financial statements, which are included in Item 8 of this report.statements.

(2)

2009 results include a pre-tax net gain of $20 million ($12 million after tax) related to settlement of the Company’s litigation with Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and a pre-tax charge of $25.5 million ($15.6 million after tax) related to the shutdown of the Company’s North Brunswick, New Jersey plant.
(3)

2010 results include a pension settlement charge of approximately $24 million pre-tax ($15.5 million after tax).

(4)

(3)

Reflects

2014 results reflect an increase of $300 and its impact on interest expense due to the acquisition of assets of Lil’ Drug Store Brands.  2012 results reflect an increase of $650 in debt and its impact on interest expense due to the acquisition of Avid Health, and 2010 results reflect a reduction in debt due to payment of the $408 million outstanding balance under, and termination of, the Company’sCompany's term loan provided by a syndicate of banks.

(5)

(4)

Includes in 2008 and 2009, $51 million and $85 million, respectively,

2014 results include approximately $34.0 for construction ofexpenditures for the gummy dietary supplement product line expansion at the York Pennsylvaniafacilities.  2012 results include $37.8 for expenditures for the Victorville facility.

(6)

(5)

2011 results include a $13 million or $0.9$0.09 per share charge associated with an international deferred tax valuation allowance.


32


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

ITEM 7ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

OVERVIEW

The Company’s Business

The Company develops, manufactures, markets and sells a broad range of consumerhousehold, personal care and specialty products.  It recognizes revenues and profits from sellingThe Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brands tothrough a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, drugmass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores, and mass merchandisers thatwebsites, all of which sell the products to consumers.  The Company also sells itsspecialty products to industrial customers and distributors.  The Company focuses its consumer products marketing efforts principally on its eight “power brands.”  These well-recognized brand names include ARM & HAMMER (used in multiple product categories such as baking soda, cat litter, carpet deodorization and laundry detergent), TROJAN condoms, XTRAlubricants and vibrators, OXICLEAN stain removers, cleaning solutions, laundry detergent, OXICLEAN pre-wash laundry additive, NAIR depilatories,dishwashing detergent and bleach alternatives, SPINBRUSH battery-operated and manual toothbrushes,  FIRST RESPONSE home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, NAIR depilatories, ORAJEL oral analgesics, XTRA laundry detergent, and SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes. L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplements.  The Company’sCompany considers four of these brands to be “mega brands”: ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN, and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION, and is giving greatest focus to the growth of these brands.

The Company operates its business is divided intoin three primary segments,segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products.SPD.  The Consumer Domestic segment includes the eight power brands noted above and other household and personal care products such as SCRUB FREE, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products, FELINE PINE Cat Litter, ANSWER home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, ARRID antiperspirant, CLOSE-UP and AIM toothpastes and SIMPLY SALINE Nasal Saline Moisturizer.nasal saline moisturizer.  The Consumer International segment primarily sells a variety of personal care products, some of which use the same brand names as ourthe Company’s domestic product lines, in international markets including Canada, France, Australia, the United Kingdom, Mexico Brazil and China.Brazil.  The Specialty ProductsSPD segment is the largest U.S. producer of sodium bicarbonate, which it sells together with other specialty inorganic chemicals for a variety of industrial, institutional, medical and food applications.  This segment also sells a range of animal nutrition and specialty cleaning products.  In 2011,2014, the Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty ProductsSPD segments represented approximately 72%75%, 19%16% and 9%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated net sales.

Economic Conditions2014 Financial Highlights

As has been the caseKey fiscal year 2014 financial results include:

·

2014 net sales grew 3.2% over fiscal year 2013, with gains in all three of the Company’s segments, primarily due to volume growth and the impact of the 2014 acquisition of the Lil’ Drug Store brands, partially offset by higher promotional spending and currency fluctuations.

·

Gross margin decreased 90 basis points to 44.1% in fiscal year 2014 from 45.0% in fiscal year 2013, reflecting higher promotional spending in support of new and existing products, higher commodity costs and currency fluctuations.

·

Operating margin decreased 10 basis points to 19.4% in fiscal year 2014 from 19.5% in fiscal year 2013, reflecting a lower gross margin and slightly higher marketing costs, partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”).

·

The Company achieved diluted net earnings per share in fiscal year 2014 of $3.01, an increase of approximately 8.0% from fiscal year 2013 diluted net earnings per share of $2.79.

·

Cash from operations was $540.3, a $40.7 increase from the prior year, which includes the deferral of a $36 payment relating to December 2012 estimated federal tax paid in the first quarter of 2013 as a result of Hurricane Sandy relief.

·

The Company returned $646 to its stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Strategic Goals, Challenges and Initiatives

The Company’s ability to generate sales depends on consumer demand for the past few years, uncertainty about globalits products and retail customers’ decisions to carry its products, which are, in part, affected by general economic conditions has affected demand forin its markets.  In 2014, many products. Specific factors affecting demand include rates of unemployment,the markets in which the

33


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Company operates continued to experience general economic softness and weak or inconsistent consumer confidence, health care costs, fuel and other energy costs and other economic factors that affect consumer spending behavior. Whiledemand.  Although the Company’s consumer products generally are consumer staples that should beand less vulnerable to decreases in discretionary spending than other products, the Company’s productscontinued economic downturn has reduced demand in many categories, particularly those in personal care, and affected Company sales in recent periods.  Some customers have become subjectresponded to increasing price competition as recessionary conditions continue. Moreover, some of our products, such as laundry additives and battery-operated toothbrushes, are more likely to be affected by consumer decisions to control spending.

Some of our customers, including mass merchandisers, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores, wholesale clubs, pet specialty stores and dollar stores have experienced declining financial performance, which could affect their ability to pay amounts due to us on a timely basis or at all. In response, we continue to regularly conduct a review of the financial strength of our key customers. As appropriate, we modify customer credit limits, which may have an adverse impact on future sales. We also continue to regularly conduct a similar review of our suppliers to assess both their financial viability and the importance of their products to our operations. Where appropriate, we will seek to identify alternate sources of materials and services. To date, we have not experienced a material adverse impact from economic conditions affecting our customers or suppliers. However, a continued economic decline that adversely affects our suppliers and customers could adversely affect our operations and sales.

In addition, many of our customers sell products under their own private label brands that compete with products that we sell. As consumers look for opportunities to decrease discretionary spending during current

difficult economic times, some of our customers have discontinued or reduce distribution of our products to encourage those consumers to purchase our customers’ less expensive private label products. To offset any adverse effect on our business that results when customers discontinue or reduce distribution of our products or take actions to increase shelf space forby increasing their private label products, we focus our efforts on improving distribution with other customers. While these efforts have generally been effective, our results could be adversely affected if these efforts are not effective.

Commodity Prices

Following raw material price increases in 2010, prices for commodities continued to increase in 2011. As a result, the cost of surfactants, diesel fuel, corrugated paper and oil-based raw and packaging materials usedofferings (primarily in the householddietary supplements, diagnostic kits and specialty products businesses were all higher on averageoral analgesics categories), and consolidating the product selections they offer to the top few leading brands in 2011 than 2010. Additional increases in the priceseach category.  In addition, an increasing portion of certain raw materials could materially impact the Company’s costsproduct categories are being sold by club stores, dollar stores and financial results ifmass merchandisers.  These customer actions have placed downward pressure on the Company is unable to pass such costs along in the form of price increases to its customers.

Recent Developments

New Manufacturing Facility

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company announced its decision to relocate a portion of its Green River, Wyoming operations to a newly leased site in Victorville, California in the first half of 2012. Specifically, the Company will be relocating its cat litter manufacturing operationsCompany’s sales and distribution center to this southern California site to be closer to transportation hubs and its West Coast customers. The site will also produce liquid laundry detergent products and is expandable to meet future business needs. The Company’s sodium bicarbonate operations and other consumer product manufacturing will remain at the Green River facility.gross margins.

The Company invested approximately $11 millionexpects a competitive marketplace in 2015 due to new product introductions by competitors and continuing aggressive competitive pricing pressures.  In the U.S., an improving unemployment rate and higher disposable income due to low gasoline prices are expected to have a positive effect on consumption patterns in the Victorville sitesecond half of 2015.  To continue to deliver attractive results for stockholders in 2011.this environment, the Company intends to continue to aggressively pursue several key strategic initiatives: maintain competitive marketing and trade spending, tightly control its cost structure, continue to develop and launch new and differentiated products, and pursue strategic acquisitions.  The Company anticipates that,also intends to continue to grow its product sales geographically (in an attempt to mitigate the impact of weakness in connectionany one area), and maintain an offering of premium and value brand products (to appeal to a wide range of consumers).

The Company continues to experience heightened competitive activity in certain product categories from other larger multinational competitors, some of which have greater resources.  Such activities have included new product introductions, more aggressive product claims and marketing challenges, as well as increased promotional spending.  Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has been significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category, contributing to an overall category decline.  During 2012, 2013 and 2014 the category declined by 0.6%, 3.2% and 2.9%, respectively.  

In 2014, P&G, one of the Company’s major competitors and the market leader in premium laundry detergent, including unit dose laundry detergent, reconfigured certain of its product offerings and related marketing and pricing strategies and launched various products to compete more directly with the openingCompany’s core ARM & HAMMER, XTRA and OXICLEAN power brands.  For example, P&G launched a lower-priced line of laundry detergents to compete directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents, and launched a versatile stain remover to compete with OXICLEAN, the Company’s pre-wash additive.  

The Company responded to these competitive pressures by, among other things, focusing on strengthening its key brands, including increased focus on the ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION mega brands, which each span various product categories, including premium and value household products, and represented approximately 60% of the Victorville siteCompany’s sales and changesprofits in 2014, through the launch of innovative new products and strong sales execution supported by increased marketing and trade spending.  These mega brands have advantages over other power brands, including the ability to leverage research and development and marketing investments and lower overhead costs across mega brand categories.  For example, the Company’s 2014 responsive product introductions include the simultaneous launch of OXICLEAN branded products into the mid/premium tier laundry detergent segment, and auto dish detergent category and bleach alternatives with continued support of, and innovation in, the Company’s base ARM &HAMMER and OXICLEAN businesses, to create scale and maximize marketing efforts.  In 2015, the Company intends to continue to heavily invest in the OXICLEAN brand as 2015 marks the second year of the Company’s goal to establish OXICLEAN as a mega brand in multiple categories.  Mega brand launches and launches of other products are anticipated atto contribute more incremental new product revenue than the Green River facility, its total capital expendituresintroduction of new products has in prior years, and a significant portion of those revenues will include expansion into new categories with premium household products, supported by increased levels of slotting, trade promotions and incremental marketing support and planned ongoing technology investment.  There can be no assurance that these measures will be successful.  

Despite challenging economic conditions and customer responses to these conditions, the Company was able to grow market share in six of nine of its “power brands” in 2014, including in the laundry detergent category.  The Company’s global product portfolio consists of both premium (60% of total worldwide consumer revenue in 2014) and value (40% of total worldwide consumer revenue in 2014) brands, which it believes enables it to succeed in a range of economic environments.  The Company’s value brands have performed strongly during economic downturns, and the Company intends to continue to develop a portfolio of appealing new products to build loyalty among cost-conscious consumers.

Over the past 15 years, the Company has diversified from an almost exclusively U.S. business to a global company with approximately $35 million and it will incur approximately $7 million16% of sales derived from foreign countries in transition expenses. The transition expenses include anticipated severance costs and accelerated depreciation of equipment at the Company’s Green River facility and one-time project expenses.2014.  The Company has recorded approximately $3.6 millionoperations in transition expenses in 2011. These expenditures are recorded in the Consumer Domestic segment.

Two-for-one stock split

On June 1, 2011,six countries (Canada, Mexico, U.K., France, Australia and Brazil) and exports to over 90 other countries.  In 2014, the Company effectedbenefited from its concentration in North America in light of the economic downturn in Europe; however, the Company has continued and will continue to focus on

34


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

selectively expanding its global business.  Net sales generated outside of the United States are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations as well as political uncertainty which could impact future operating results.  

The Company also continues to focus on controlling its costs.  The Company experienced continued high raw material and energy costs throughout 2014.  Historically, the Company has been able to mitigate the effects of cost increases primarily by implementing cost reduction programs and, to a two-for-one stock splitlesser extent, by passing along some of these cost increases to customers.  The Company has also entered into set pricing and pre-buying arrangements with certain suppliers and hedge agreements for diesel fuel.  The Company expects by the second half of 2015 to benefit from macro trends, including an improving U.S. economy, lower commodity prices and productivity programs.  

Additionally, maintaining tight controls on overhead costs has been a hallmark of the Company and has enabled it to effectively navigate recent challenging economic conditions.  

The identification and integration of strategic acquisitions are an important component of the Company’s Common Stockoverall strategy.  Acquisitions have added significantly to Company sales and profits over the last decade.  However, the failure to effectively integrate any acquisition or achieve expected synergies may cause the Company to incur material asset write-downs.  The Company actively seeks acquisitions that fit its guidelines, and its strong financial position provides it with flexibility to take advantage of acquisition opportunities.  In addition, the Company’s ability to quickly integrate acquisitions and leverage existing infrastructure has enabled it to establish a strong track record in making accretive acquisitions.  Since 2001, the formCompany has acquired eight of its nine “power brands”.    

The Company believes it is positioned to meet the ongoing challenges described above due to its strong financial condition, experience operating in challenging environments and continued focus on key strategic initiatives: maintaining competitive marketing and trade spending, managing its cost structure, continuing to develop and launch new and differentiated products, and pursuing strategic acquisitions.  This focus, together with the strength of the Company’s portfolio of premium and value brands, has enabled the Company to succeed in a range of economic environments, and is expected to position the Company to continue to increase stockholder value over the long-term.  Moreover, the generation of a 100% stock dividend. All applicable amountssignificant amount of cash from operations, as a result of net income and effective working capital management, combined with an investment grade credit rating provides the Company with the financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions, drive new product development, make capital expenditures to support organic growth and gross margin improvements, return cash to stockholders through dividends and  share buy backs, and reduce outstanding debt, positioning it to continue to create stockholder value.  

For information regarding risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, see “Risk Factors” in the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Recent Developments

Acquisitions

BATISTELil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition

On June 28, 2011,September 19, 2014, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo brandcertain feminine care brands, including REPHRESH and REPLENS, from Vivalis, Limited (“BATISTELil’ Drug Store Products, Inc., (the “Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”) for cash consideration of $64.8 million.$215.7.  The Company paid for the acquisition fromwith additional debt.  The annual sales of the acquired brands are approximately $46.0.  These feminine care brands are managed within the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments.

VI-COR Acquisition

On January 2, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Varied Industries Corporation (the “VI-COR Acquisition”), a manufacturer and seller of feed ingredients for cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock.  The total purchase price was approximately $75, which is subject to adjustment based on the closing working capital of VI-COR, and a $5 payment after one year if certain operating performance is achieved. The Company financed the acquisition with available cash. BATISTEVI-COR’s annual sales are approximately $20.0 million. The BATISTE brand is$25.  These brands will be managed principally within the Consumer InternationalSpecialty Products segment.

New Corporate Office Building35


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a 20 year lease for a new corporate headquarters building that will be constructed(Dollars in Ewing, New Jersey (approximately 10 miles from the Company’s existing corporate headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey) to meet office space needs for the foreseeable future. Based on current

millions, except share and per share data)

expectations that the facility will be completedDividend Increase and occupied beginning in early 2013, the lease will expire in 2033. The Company’s lease commitment is approximately $116 million over the lease term. In conjunction with its lease of the new headquarters building, the Company will be vacating three leased facilities adjacent to its current Princeton headquarters facility. Based on certain clauses in the lease, for financial statement reporting purposes, the Company is considered the owner during the construction period, and recorded $17.4 million in construction in progress assets with a corresponding offset in other long-term liabilities.

Share Repurchase Authorization

On August 4, 2011,January 28, 2015 the Board declared an 8% increase in the regular quarterly dividend from $0.31 to $0.335 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend of $1.34 per share payable to stockholders of record as of February 10, 2015.  The increase raises the annual dividend payout from $168 to approximately $177.

On January 28, 2015, the Board authorized the 2015 Share Repurchase Program which replaces the Company’s Board2014 Share Repurchase Program.  In 2014, the Company purchased 6.9 million shares at an aggregate cost of Directors authorizedapproximately $479 of which $393 was purchased under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program and $86 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase of up to $300 million ofprogram, under which the Company’s Common Stock. Any purchasesCompany may, be made from time to time, repurchase shares of Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans.  

As part of the evergreen share repurchase program, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, subject to market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. There is no expiration date on the stock repurchase authorization, andearly January 2015, the Company is not obligated to acquire any specific numberpurchased 0.5 million shares of shares. The Company purchased 1.8 million sharesCommon Stock at a cost of $80.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

New Joint Venture

On September 22, 2011, the Company, together with FMC Corporation and TATA Chemicals, formed an operating joint venture, Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”).approximately $41.2.  The Company has a one-third ownership interestused cash on hand to fund the purchase price.

As part of the 2015 Share Repurchase Program and the evergreen share repurchase program, in Natronx, and its investment is accounted for under the equity method. The joint venture will engage in the manufacturing and marketing of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. The sorbents, primarily sodium bicarbonate and trona, are used by coal-fired utilities to remove harmful pollutants, such as acid gases, in flue-gas treatment processes. Natronx intends to invest approximately $60 million to construct a 450,000 ton per year facility in Wyoming to produce trona sorbents by the fourth quarter of 2012, the cost of which will be equally shared among all members. The joint venture started business in the fourth quarter of 2011and the Company has made an initial investment of approximately $3 million as of December 31, 2011 and is committed to investing upwards of an additional $17 million in 2012.

Commercial Paper Notes

In the third quarter of 2011,February 2015, the Company entered into an agreementaccelerated share repurchase contract with two banks to establish a commercial paper program (the “Program”). Underbank to purchase $215 of the Program,Company’s common stock.  The Company paid $215 to the Company may issue notes from time to time up tobank, inclusive of fees, and received an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any given time initial delivery of $500 million. approximately 2.6 million shares. The maturities of the notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days. The notescontract will be sold under customary terms in the commercial paper market and will be issued at a discount to par or, alternatively, will be sold at par and will bear varying interest rates based on a fixed or floating rate basis. The interest rates will vary based on market conditions and the ratings assigned to the notessettled by the credit rating agencies at the time of issuance. Subject to market conditions, the Company intends to utilize the Program as its primary short-term borrowing facility and does not intend to sell unsecured commercial paper notes in excess of the available amount under the revolving credit agreement.mid-May 2015.  If for any reason, the Company is unablerequired to accessdeliver value to the commercial paper market,bank at the revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) would be utilizedend of the purchase period, the Company, at its option, may elect to meetsettle in shares of Common Stock or cash.  

Of the 2015 share repurchases, approximately $88.0 was purchased under the Company’s short-term liquidity needs. The Company recently amended the Credit Agreement to support the Program. Total combined borrowing under both the Credit Agreement and the Program may not exceed $500 million. Additionally the Credit Agreement was also extended through August 4, 2016. The Company did not issue any commercial paper notes in 2011. As a result of the Program, the Company terminated its accounts receivable securitization facility as the notes issued under the Program bear a lower interest rate than notes issued under the securitization facility.evergreen share repurchase program.

Information Systems Upgrade

The Company upgraded its information systems at its subsidiary in Canada effective October 1, 2011. A similar upgrade was implemented at its U.S. operations as of January 1, 2012 and currently is scheduled to be

implemented at certain other subsidiaries during 2012. The Company estimates that sales in the fourth quarter of 2011 increased by approximately $9 million due to orders from customers in advance of the U.S. implementation.

As a result of the upgrade, the Company eliminated the one month reporting lag of the three subsidiaries whose fiscal year ended November 30th to be consistent with the fiscal calendar of the Company and its other subsidiaries. Due to the elimination of the reporting lag, 13 fiscal months of financial results are included in 2011 results for those affected subsidiaries. The implementation of the new information system will enable the Company to timely consolidate these results. The elimination of this previously existing reporting lag is considered a change in accounting principle. The Company believes this change is preferable because it provides more current information to the users of the financial statements and eliminates the need to track and reconcile material intervening transactions. The Company has determined that the impact of the extra month is not material to its financial statements and as such has not retrospectively adjusted prior year amounts. The manner in which the change was recorded increased 2011 annual net sales by $14.3 million or 0.6% and had a negligible impact on net income of this year. No historical trends were impacted. If the change had been made retrospectively, net sales in 2010 and 2009 would have been (lower) / higher by $(1.0) and $4.8 million respectively, and net income would have been higher by $0.1 and $1.1 million respectively.

In 2012, the Company is changing its 4 week—4 week—5 week quarterly reporting calendar to a month-end quarterly calendar. This change is also the result of the upgrade of its information systems. This change will eliminate differences in the number of days in the first and fourth quarters of the year, when the Company provides year-over-prior year period comparisons beginning in 2013. The impact of the change in the quarterly reporting calendar will not be material for 2012.

Brazil’s Chemical Business

The Company is exploring strategic options for its chemical business in Brazil. The business, which has annual revenues of approximately $40 million, markets sodium bicarbonate, dairy products and other chemicals in Brazil. The net assets associated with a portion of this business have been classified as “held for sale” for financial statement reporting purposes as of December 31, 2011.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. (GAAP).  The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  By their nature, these judgments are subject to uncertainty.  They are based on the Company’s historical experience, its observation of trends in industry, information provided by its customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate.  The Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates are described below.

Revenue Recognition and Promotional and Sales Return Reserves

Virtually all of the Company’s revenue represents sales of finished goods inventory and is recognized when deliveredreceived or picked up by ourthe Company’s customers.  The reserves for consumer and trade promotion liabilities and sales returns are established based on ourthe Company’s best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date.  Promotional reserves are provided for sales incentives, such as coupons to consumers, and sales incentives provided to customers (such as slotting, cooperative advertising, incentive discounts based on volume of sales and other arrangements made directly with customers).  All such costs are netted against sales.  Slotting costs are recorded when the product is delivered to the customer.  Cooperative advertising costs are recorded when the customer places the advertisement for the Company’s products.  Discounts relating to price reduction arrangements are recorded when the related sale takes place.  Costs

associated with end-aisle or other in-store displays are recorded when product that is subject to the promotion is sold.  The Company relies on historical experience and forecasted data to determine the required reserves.  For example, the Company uses historical experience to project coupon redemption rates to determine reserve requirements.  Based on the total face value of Consumer Domestic coupons redeemed over the past several years, if the actual rate of redemptions were to deviate by 0.1% from the rate for which reserves are accrued in the financial statements, an approximately $2.1 million$5.4 difference in the reserve required for coupons would result.  With regard to other promotional reserves and sales returns, the Company uses experience-based estimates, customer and sales organization inputs and historical trend analysis in arriving at the reserves required.  If the Company’s estimates for promotional activities and sales returns were to change by 10% the impact to promotional spending and sales return accruals would be approximately $5.7 million.$6.2.  While management believes that its promotional and sales returns reserves are reasonable and that appropriate judgments have been made, estimated amounts could differ materially from actual future obligations.  During the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, the Company reduced promotion liabilities by approximately $8.2 million, $6.8 million$6.7, $3.7 and $7.8 million,$4.0, respectively, based on a change in estimate as a result of actual experience and updated information.  These adjustments are immaterial relative to the amount of trade promotion expense incurred annually by the Company.

36


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Impairment of goodwill, trademarkstrade names and other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

Carrying values of goodwill, trademarkstrade names and other indefinite lived intangible assets are reviewed periodically for possible impairment.For finite intangible assets, the Company assesses business triggering events.  The Company’s impairment reviewanalysis is based on a discounted cash flow approach that requires significant judgment with respect to unit volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate.  Management uses estimates based on expected trends in making these assumptions.  With respect to goodwill, impairment occurs when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the discounted present value of cash flows for that reporting unit.  For trademarkstrade names and other intangible assets, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows, which represents the estimated fair value of the asset.  Judgment is required in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual valuations.  Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological change, distribution losses, or competitive activities and acts by governments and courts may indicate that an asset has become impaired.  ThereThe result of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeded the carrying values of all reporting units.  In addition, there were no intangiblegoodwill impairment charges for each of the three yearyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011.2014.

The Company recognized intangible asset impairment charges within SG&A for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 as follows:

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Segments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Domestic

 

$

5.0

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

0.0

 

Consumer International

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

Total

 

$

5.0

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

$

0.0

 

The impairment charges recorded in 2014 and 2013 were a result of actual and projected reductions in sales and profitability as a result of increased competition.  The amount of the impairment charges was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the assets to their carrying amount.  Fair value was estimated based on a “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” discounted cash flow method, which contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change, and therefore could impact fair values in the future.  The Company determined that the fair value of all other intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 exceeded their respective carrying values based upon the forecasted cash flows and profitability.  In 2014, the results of the Company’s annual impairment test for indefinite lived trade names resulted in a personal care trade name whose fair value exceeded its carrying value by 11%.  This trade name is valued at approximately $37 and is considered an important asset to the Company.  The Company continues to monitor performance and should there be any significant change in forecasted assumptions or estimates, including sales, profitability and discount rate, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment charge.    

It is possible that the Company’s conclusions regarding impairment or recoverability of goodwill or other intangible assets could change in future periods if, for example, (i) the businesses or brands do not perform as projected, (ii) overall economic conditions in 2015 or future years vary from current assumptions (including changes in discount rates), (iii) business conditions or strategies change from current assumptions, (iv) investors require higher rates of return on equity investments in the marketplace or (v) enterprise values of comparable publicly traded companies, or actual sales transactions of comparable companies, were to decline, resulting in lower multiples of revenues and EBITDA.  A future impairment charge for goodwill or intangible assets could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate possible impairment.The Company’s impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level at which cash flows of the long-lived assets are largely independent of other groups of Company assets and liabilities.  The analysis requires management judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines, and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates.  The Company conducts annual reviews to identify idle and underutilized equipment, and reviews business plans for possible impairment implications.  Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows.  When an impairment is indicated, the estimated

future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows.fair value.  

37


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

The Company recognized charges related to plant impairment and equipment obsolescence, which occurs in the ordinary course of business duringfor each of the three yearyears in the three-year period, ended December 31, 20112014 as follows:

   For the Year Ended December 31, 

(In millions)

    2011       2010       2009   

Segments:

      

Consumer Domestic

  $1.9    $0.6    $3.2  

Consumer International

   0.2     0.0     0.0  

Specialty Products

   1.0     3.1     6.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $3.1    $3.7    $10.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Segments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Domestic

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

1.6

 

Consumer International

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.4

 

Specialty Products

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Total

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

2.1

 

The 2011impairment charges in 2014 and 2013, and the Consumer Domestic charge is a result of theand SPD impairment charges in 2012 are due to idling of equipment.  The 2011 Specialty Products2012 Consumer International charge in 2011 is associated with the Company’s decision to explore strategic options for the specialty chemical business in Brazil. In 2010, the Company recorded a plant asset impairment charge of approximately $3.1 million, representing the carrying value of certain assets associated with its Brazil subsidiary. The charge is a result of a reduction in forecasted sales volume which has negatively impacted projected profitability. The charge is included in cost of sales in the Specialty Products Division segment. In 2009, the Company recorded a plant asset impairment charge of approximately $6.9 million, representing the carrying value of certain assets, associated with one of its international subsidiaries. The Company measured the impairment charges using the discounted cash flow method. This subsidiary manufactures some products that compete with imports priced in U.S. dollars. As the dollar has weakened, it has been necessary to lower prices in the local currency to stay competitive, leading to negative cash flows, which is the key input under the discounted cash flow method. The charge is included in cost of sales in the Specialty Products Division segment. The other charges in 2010 are due to the idling of certain equipment. The $3.2 million charge recorded in the Consumer Domestic segment in 2009 is primarily a resultcancelation of a lack of acceptance of certain products by our key customers that resulted in a decline of forecasted future cash flows and reduced profitability.software project.  The estimates and assumptions used in connection with impairment analyses are consistent with the business plans and estimates that the Company uses to manage its business operations.  Nevertheless, future outcomes may differ materially from management’s estimates.  If the Company’s products fail to achieve estimated volume and pricing targets, market conditions unfavorably change or other significant estimates are not realized, then the Company’s revenue and cost forecasts may not be achieved, and the Company may be required to recognize additional impairment charges.

Inventory valuation

When appropriate, the Company writes down the carrying value of its inventory to the lower of cost or market (net realizable value, which reflects any costs to sell or dispose).  The Company identifies any slow moving, obsolete or excess inventory to determine whether an adjustment is required to establish a new carrying value.  The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates and assumptions about the future demand for the Company’s products, technological changes, and new product introductions.  In addition, the Company’s allowance for obsolescence may be impacted by the reduction of the number of stock keeping units (“SKUs”)(SKUs).  The Company evaluates its inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis and records adjustments as required.  Adjustments to inventory to reflect a reduction in net realizable value were $4.7 million$8.3 at December 31, 2011,2014, and $6.1 million$10.1 at December 31, 2010.2013.  

Valuation of pension and postretirement benefit costs

The Company’s pension costs relate solely to its international operations.  Both pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed from actuarial valuations.  Inherent in benefit cost valuations are key assumptions provided by the Company to its actuaries, including the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.  Material changes in the Company’s international pension and domestic/international postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions as well as fluctuations in plan assets.

The discount rate is subject to change each year, consistent with changes in applicable high-quality, long-term corporate bond indices. Based on the expected duration of the benefit payments for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement plans, the Company refers to an applicable index and expected term of benefit payments to select a discount rate at which it believes the pensionplan benefits could be effectively settled.  The Company’s weighted average discount rate for its international pension plans as of December 31, 20112014 is 4.73%3.54% as compared to 5.32%4.48% used at December 31, 2010.2013.  Based on the published rate as of December 31, 20112014 that matched estimated cash flows for the plans, the Company used a weighted average discount rate of 4.25%3.77% for its domestic postretirement planplans as compared to 5.20%4.56% used at December 31, 2010.2013.  

The expected long-term rate of return on international pension plan assets is selected by taking into account athe historical trend, the expected duration of the projected benefit obligation for the plans, the asset mix of the plans and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation.  Based on these factors, the

Company’s weighted average expected long-term rate of return for assets of its pension plans for 20112014 was 5.87%6.16%, compared to 5.76%5.45% used in 2010.2013.  A 50 basis point change in the expected long-term rate of return would result in approximately $0.3 millionan approximate $0.5 change in pension expense for 2012.2015.

As noted above, changes in assumptions used by management may result in material changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs.  In 2011,2014, other comprehensive income reflected a $7.7 million$1.3 increase in its remaining pension plan obligations and a $2.3 million$4.4 increase for postretirement benefit plans.  The changes are primarily related to the change in discount rates for all plans.plans and other actuarial assumptions.

38


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

The Company made cash contributions of approximately $4.8 million$3.3 to its pension plans in 2011.2014.  The Company estimates it will be required to make cash contributions to its pension plans of approximately $3.6 million$2.4 in 20122015 to offset 20122015 benefit payments and administrative costs in excess of investment returns.

On December 31, 2014, the Company terminated an international defined benefit pension plan under which approximately 280 participants, including approximately 100 active employees, have accrued benefits.  The Company anticipates completing the termination of this plan by the end of the second quarter of 2015, once regulatory approvals are obtained.  To effect the termination, the Company estimates, based on December 31, 2014 valuations, that the plan has sufficient assets to purchase annuities for retired participants and make certain deposits to the existing defined contribution plan of active employee participants.  The Company estimates that it will incur a one-time non-cash expense of approximately $8 to $11 ($6 to $8 after tax) in 2015 when the plan settlement is completed.  This expense is primarily attributable to pension settlement accounting rules which require accelerated recognition of actuarial losses that were to be amortized over the expected benefit lives of participants.  The estimated expense is subject to change based on valuations at the actual date of settlement.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Management provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for amounts which are not considered “more likely than not” to be realized.  The Company records liabilities for potential assessments in various tax jurisdictions under U.S. GAAP guidelines.  The liabilities relate to tax return positions that, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by the tax authorities and do not meet the minimum recognition threshold required under applicable accounting guidance for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement.  The Company adjusts this liability as a result of changes in tax legislation, interpretations of laws by courts, rulings by tax authorities, changes in estimates and the expiration of the statute of limitations.  Many of the judgments involved in adjusting the liability involve assumptions and estimates that are highly uncertain and subject to change.  In this regard, settlement of any issue, or an adverse determination in litigation, with a taxing authority could require the use of cash and result in an increase in ourthe Company’s annual tax rate.  Conversely, favorable resolution of an issue with a taxing authority would be recognized as a reduction to ourthe Company’s annual tax rate.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new guidance that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue.  The new guidance provides that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to receive for those goods or services.  The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and allows companies to apply the requirements retrospectively, either to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment in the year of adoption.  Early adoption is not allowed.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

There have been no other accounting pronouncements issued but not yet adopted by the Company which are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Accounting pronouncements adopted during the periods presented resulted in changes to disclosures but did not have a material impact on the Company’sconsolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

39


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 AND 20092012

The discussion of results of operations at the consolidated level presented below is followed by a more detailed discussion of results of operations by segment.  The discussion of the Company’s consolidated results of operations and segment operating results is presented on a historical basis for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2010,2014, 2013, and 2009.2012.  The segment discussion also addresses certain product line information.  The Company’s operating units are consistent with its reportable segments.

Consolidated results

20112014 compared to 20102013

Net Sales

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 20112014 were $2,749.3 million, $160.1 million$3,297.6, an increase of $103.3, or approximately 6.2% above 20103.2% as compared to 2013 net sales.  The components of the net sales increase are the following:as follows:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Sales - Consolidated

December 31,
2011

2014

Product volumes sold

3.9

4.4

%

PricingPricing/Product mix

0.2

(0.9

%)

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

1.0

(0.5

%)

Change in customer delivery arrangementsAcquired product lines(1)

(0.2

0.4

%

Divested product lines / other

(0.2

%)

Net Sales increase

3.2

%

(1)

On September 19, 2014, the Company acquired certain feminine care brands from Lil’ Drug Store Products Inc. (“Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”).  Net sales of the brands acquired in the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition are included in the Company’s results since the date of acquisition.

All three segments reported volume increases. The unfavorable price/mix in the Consumer Domestic segment, primarily due to new product introductory costs and a higher level of trade and coupon promotion for existing products, was partially offset by favorable price/mix in SPD.

Gross Profit

The Company’s gross profit for 2014 was $1,452.9, a $14.9 increase as compared to the same period in 2013 due to the effect of higher sales volume, productivity improvement programs and the impact of the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition, partially offset by the costs associated with new product launches, higher commodity costs and currency fluctuations. Gross margin was 44.1% in 2014 as compared to 45.0% in 2013.  Gross margin was lower due to higher trade promotion, coupon, slotting, commodity costs and currency fluctuations, partially offset by the positive impact of productivity improvement programs.

Operating Costs

Marketing expenses for 2014 were $416.9, an increase of $17.1 as compared to 2013 due primarily to expenses in support of new product launches and increased expenses in certain other power brands.  Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales were 12.6% in 2014 as compared to 12.5% in 2013.

SG&A expenses for 2014 were $394.8, a decrease of $21.2 as compared to 2013 due primarily to lower compensation costs and employee benefit costs, lower legal costs, lower intangible asset impairment charges and lower cease use charges associated with the Company’s Princeton, New Jersey leased buildings, partially offset by higher intangible amortization expense, in part due to the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition.  Additionally, in 2013 the Company incurred costs related to the integration of the gummy dietary supplements business, which were not incurred in 2014.  SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 12.1% in 2014 as compared to 13.0% in 2013.

Other Income and Expenses

Equity in earnings of affiliates for 2014 was $11.6 as compared to $2.8 in 2013.  The increase in earnings was due primarily to profit improvement from Armand and a smaller loss at Natronx.  Also, in the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge associated with one of its affiliates.

40


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Interest expense in 2014 was $27.4, a decrease of $0.3 compared to 2013.  

Taxation

The 2014 tax rate was 33.8% as compared to 34.0% in 2013.  

2013 compared to 2012

Net Sales

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $3,194.3, an increase of $272.4 or approximately 9.3% as compared to 2012 net sales.  The components of the net sales increase are as follows:

December 31,

Net Sales - Consolidated

2013

Product volumes sold

3.8

%

Pricing/Product mix

(1.9

%)

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

(0.5

%)

Acquired product lines(1)

1.3

Divested product lines(2)

(0.1%) 

Discontinued product line

(0.8%) 

Change in fiscal calendar7.6

0.6

%

Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade

0.3

%

Net Sales increase

 

 

Net Sales increase

6.2

9.3

%

(1)

(1)

On June 28, 2011,October 1, 2012, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo product line. The Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE product line on June 4, 2010,L’IL CRITTERS and the FELINE PINE product line on December 21, 2010.VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business.  Net sales of the acquiredthese product lines subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s results.results since the date of acquisition.

(2)Product lines divested include the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010.

The volume change primarily reflects increased product sales of consumer products sold in the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. Specialty Product segment (“SPD”) volumes were unchanged. Pricing had minimal impact on total net sales, as favorable pricing forsegments partially offset by lower SPD sales.  Lower price/mix in Consumer Domestic and SPD was partially offset by the unfavorable pricing for Consumer Domestic andfavorable price/mix in Consumer International.  Sales in the fourthfirst quarter of 2011 benefited from2012 were negatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer buying patternsorders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in advanceanticipation of the January 1, 2012 information system implementationsystems upgrade in the United States. The impact on Income before Income Taxes on these sales was not material. The discontinued product line reflects the Company’s decision in late 2010 to cease a foreign subsidiary’s sale of a certain chemical product line. The impact of the discontinued product line on Income before Income Taxes was not material. Other components of the net sales increase reflect the Company’s change in delivery arrangements with certain customers at the beginning of the second quarter of 2010, which resulted in a reduction in net sales due to a transportation allowance for a customer pick-up program. Previously, the cost to ship product was included in cost of sales.U.S.

Operating CostsGross Profit

The Company’s gross profit for 2013 was $1,214.5 million in 2011,$1,438.0, a $56.7 million$146.6 increase as compared to 2010. The gross profit increase wasthe same period in 2012 due primarily attributable to contributions from its gummy dietary supplement business, higher sales volumes, contributions from the acquired

product lines, slightly favorable pricing, the effect of cost reduction programsvolume and favorable foreign exchange rates,productivity improvement programs.  These increases were partially offset by higher commoditytrade promotion and an unfavorable product mix.  Commodity costs and $3 million of charges associated with the decision to explore strategic alternatives for the chemical businessCompany were unchanged in Brazil. Price increases for detergent and condoms mitigated a portion of the significant increases in the cost of resins, surfactants and latex. The 2010 gross profit includes charges for environmental remediation, asset impairment and plant shutdown costs of $7.6 million at the Company’s Brazil subsidiary. Gross margin decreased 50 basis points to 44.2%2013 as compared to 44.7%2012.  Gross margin was 45.0% in 2010. This decrease is principally2013 as compared to 44.2% in 2012.  Gross margin was higher due to the positive impact of productivity improvement programs and higher commodity costs, an unfavorable product mix andsales volume, partially offset by higher trade promotion spending, partially offset by manufacturing cost reduction projects.and coupon costs and unfavorable product mix.

Operating Costs

Marketing expenseexpenses for 2011 was $354.1 million,2013 were $399.8, an increase of $16.1 million$42.5 as compared to 2010. Marketing2012 due primarily to the gummy dietary supplement business, higher spending primarily was in support of the Company’s eightcertain power brands as well as expenses of the recently acquiredand new product lines, BATISTE and FELINE PINE, and the effect of exchange rates.launches.  Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales was 12.9%were 12.5% in 20112013 as compared to 13.1%12.2% in 2010. This reduction is due to a shift toward higher trade promotion spending, which is included in net sales.2012.  

Selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses (“SG&A”)for 2013 were $367.8 million in 2011, a decrease$416.0, an increase of $7.0 million$27.0 as compared to 2010. SG&A in 2010 included a $24 million charge related2012 due primarily to operating costs associated with the transfer and settlementacquisition of the Company’s U.S. pension plan obligations. Several components of the Company’s SG&A were higher in 2011 than in 2010, including higher legal expenses in 2011 related in part to the Company’s response to an FTC subpoenaL’IL CRITTERS and defense of a related lawsuit,VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business, higher research and development expenses, transition and amortization expense related to the product lines acquired in 2010compensation costs and 2011 and the effect of foreign exchange rates,intangible asset impairment charges, partially offset by lower incentive compensation costs andlegal expenses.  SG&A as a gain on the salepercentage of certain LAMBERT KAY product linesnet sales was 13.0% in 2010.2013 as compared to 13.3% in 2012.

Other Income and Expenses

In 2011, equityEquity in earnings of affiliates for 2013 was $10.0 million$2.8 as compared to $5.0 million$8.9 in 2010.2012.  The increasedecrease is due primarily to higher equity income froman impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2013 associated with one of the Company’s affiliates and lower earnings from Armand Products Company joint venture primarily as a result of lower costsincreased raw material costs.

41


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Interest expense in 2013 increased $13.7 compared to 2012 principally due to debt incurred to finance the acquisition of a key raw material.the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2012 and interest associated with the financing lease obligation for the Company’s global headquarters that was fully occupied in January 2013.  

Other expenseTaxation

The 2013 tax rate was approximately $1.2 million in 201134.0% as compared to other expense of $4.6 million35.5% in 2010, which reflects the 2010 write-off of approximately $4.5 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s prepayment of variable and subordinated debt. (See the “Liquidity and capital resources” below in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis for further information.)

Interest expense for 2011 decreased $19.1 million compared to 2010. The decline was due to lower average debt outstanding as a result of the Company’s repayment of debt at the end of 2010, refinancing of its bond debt and the reversal of interest accruals following the settlement of a state tax audit. The 2010 amount includes a $3.0 million reversal of interest accruals associated with certain tax reserves following the settlement of an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit and the lapse of applicable statues of limitations, which was offset by a $4.3 million charge associated with the termination of the Company’s interest rate collar and interest swap agreements.

Investment earnings of $1.9 million were higher than in 2010 due to interest received on a federal tax refund and higher investment returns primarily at the Company’s international subsidiaries.

Taxation

The 2011 tax rate was 37.4% as compared to 35.3% in 2010.2012.  The effective tax rate for 2011 included2013 was favorably affected by a chargelower effective state tax rate and tax benefits relating to the federal research tax credit for 2013 and the establishment of a valuation allowance of approximately $13 million against the deferred tax assetsretroactive extension of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, offset by a deferred incomefederal research tax benefit of approximately $6 million relatingcredit to New Jersey’s corporate tax reform legislation enactedJanuary 2012 that occurred in April 2011. The effective tax rate

for 2010 included a benefit from an increase in the U.S. manufacturing tax deduction and the reversal of approximately $4.1 million associated with certain tax liabilities following the settlement of an IRS audit and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

Consolidated results

2010 compared to 2009

Net Sales

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $2,589.2 million, $68.3 million or approximately 2.7% above 2009 net sales. The components of the net sales increase are the following:

Net Sales—Consolidated

December 31,
2010

Product volumes sold

5.5

Pricing and sales mix

(2.5%) 

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

1.1

Change in customer delivery arrangements and allowances

(0.9%) 

Acquired product lines(1)

0.5

Divested product lines(2)

(1.0%) 

Net Sales increase

2.7

(1)On June 4, 2010, the Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE product line, and in late December 2010, acquired the FELINE PINE product line. Net sales of the acquired product lines subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s results. (See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)
(2)Product lines divested include the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010, and ancillary products divested in the third quarter of 2009 that initially were acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the ORAJEL brand of products from Del Laboratories, Inc., a subsidiary of Coty, Inc., in October 2008 (the “Orajel Acquisition”).

The reductions resulting from pricing and sales mix primarily reflect higher trade promotion and slotting costs in support of new product launches. At the beginning of the second quarter of 2010, the Company changed delivery arrangements with certain customers, which resulted in a reduction in net sales due to a transportation allowance for a customer pick-up program. Previously, the cost to ship product was included in cost of sales.

Operating Costs

The Company’s gross profit was $1,157.8 million in 2010, a $56.8 million increase as compared to 2009. The gross profit increase was attributable to higher sales volumes and lower manufacturing conversion costs, partially as a result of cost efficiencies derived from the Company’s new manufacturing facility in York, Pennsylvania, a reduction in costs associated with the shutdown of the Company’s manufacturing and warehouse facility in North Brunswick, New Jersey in 2009; a contribution from the SIMPLY SALINE business, which was acquired late in the second quarter of 2010; and favorable foreign exchange rates. Partially offsetting the gross profit improvement were higher trade promotion and slotting costs, higher commodity costs, the net effect of the divested and acquired product lines, and the change in customer delivery arrangements. The 2010 gross profit includes charges for environmental remediation, asset impairment and plant shutdown of $7.6 million at a Company’s international subsidiary. The gross profit in 2009 reflected an asset impairment charge and an environmental remediation charge of approximately $6.0 million also at the Company’s international subsidiary. Gross margin increased 100 basis points to 44.7% as compared to 43.7% in 2009. This increase is principally due to the reduction in costs related to the North Brunswick plant shutdown, manufacturing efficiencies in the new plant in York, Pennsylvania, and the change in customer delivery arrangements, partially offset by higher trade spending and commodity costs.

Marketing expenses for 2010 were $338.0 million, a decrease of $15.7 million or 4.4% as compared to 2009. Marketing spending primarily was in support of the Company’s eight power brands. Funds from the reduction in marketing expenses were primarily used to increase trade promotion expenses (reflected in net sales) due to competitive pricing activity.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $374.8 million in 2010, an increase of $20.3 million as compared to 2009. The increase in SG&A in 2010 includes the approximate $24.0 million expense related to the transfer and settlement of the U.S. Pension Plan obligations. The increase also is attributable to the effect of foreign exchange rates, higher selling costs in support of higher sales, costs associated with a global information system upgrade project and higher legal expenses partially offset by lower incentive compensation costs and the $1.0 million gain on the sale of certain LAMBERT KAY product lines during the first quarter of 2010.

2013.  The consolidated statement of income for 2009 reflects the $20.0 million pre-tax gain, net of legal expenses, recognized by the Company in connection with the settlement of its litigation against Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information).

Other Income and Expenses

In 2010, equity in earnings of affiliates was $5.0 million as compared to $12.1 million in 2009. The decrease is due to lower equity income from the Company’s Armand Products Company joint venture due to lower pricing resulting from increased competitive activity and higher raw material costs.

Other expense was approximately $4.6 million in 2010 as compared to other income of $1.5 million in 2009, which is primarily attributable to the write-off of approximately $4.5 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s prepayment of variable and subordinated debt. (See “Liquidity and capital resources” below in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis for further information.)

Interest expense for 2010 decreased $7.8 million compared to 2009. The decline was due to the reversal of interest accruals of approximately $3.0 million associated with certain tax reserves following the settlement of an IRS audit and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations, lower interest rates compared to the prior year, and lower average debt outstanding, partially offset by a charge of $4.6 million relating to the termination of the Company’s interest rate collar and interest rate swap agreements. This termination was due to the Company’s repayment of its variable rate debt in the fourth quarter of 2010. (See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)

Investment earnings of $0.6 million were lower due to a significant decline in interest rates.

Taxation

The 20102012 tax rate was 35.3% as compared to 37.9% in 2009. The effectivereflects no federal research tax rate for 2010 included a benefit from an increase in the U.S. manufacturing tax deduction and the reversal of approximately $4.1 million associated with certain tax liabilities following the settlement of an IRS audit and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.credit.

Segment results for 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

The Company operates three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products Division (“SPD”).SPD.  These segments are determined based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership structures.  The results of the Lil Drug Store Brands Acquisition are reflected in the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments.  The Company also has a Corporate segment.

 

Segment

Products

Consumer Domestic

Household and personal care products

Consumer International

Primarily personal care products

SPD

Specialty chemical products

The Corporate segment income consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates.  TheAs of December 31, 2014, the Company hadheld 50% ownership interests in each of Armand Products Company (“Armand”) and The ArmaKleen, Company (“ArmaKleen”) as of December 31, 2011.respectively, and a one-third ownership interest in Natronx.  The Company’s equity in earnings (losses) of Armand, ArmaKleen and ArmaKleenNatronx for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012 is included in the Corporate segment.  In September 2011, the Company formed an operating joint venture, Natronx, in which it has a one-third ownership. The Company’s equity in Natronx’s operating results is also included in the Corporate segment.

Some of the subsidiaries that are included in the Consumer International segment manufacture and sell personal care products to the Consumer Domestic segment.  These sales are eliminated from the Consumer International segment results set forth below.

Segment net sales and income before income taxes and minority interest for each of the three years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 were as follows:

 

(In millions)

  Consumer
Domestic
   Consumer
International
   SPD   Corporate   Total 

Net Sales(1)

          

2011

  $1,979.1    $509.1    $261.1    $0.0    $2,749.3  

2010

   1,886.1     444.0     259.1     0.0     2,589.2  

2009

   1,881.7     393.7     245.5     0.0     2,520.9  

Income Before Income Taxes(2)

          

2011

  $386.0    $68.9    $29.7    $10.0    $494.6  

2010

   341.9     52.6     18.8     5.0     418.3  

2009

   325.6     38.6     16.0     12.0     392.2  

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

International

 

 

SPD

 

 

Corporate(3)

 

 

Total

 

Net Sales(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

2,471.6

 

 

$

535.2

 

 

$

290.8

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

3,297.6

 

2013

 

 

2,413.5

 

 

 

532.8

 

 

 

248.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

3,194.3

 

2012

 

 

2,156.9

 

 

 

510.1

 

 

 

254.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

$

2,921.9

 

Income before Income Taxes(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

502.8

 

 

$

64.7

 

 

$

45.8

 

 

$

11.6

 

 

$

624.9

 

2013

 

 

501.0

 

 

 

64.5

 

 

 

29.5

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

597.8

 

2012

 

 

428.8

 

 

 

71.0

 

 

 

33.8

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

542.5

 

(1)

Intersegment sales from Consumer International to Consumer Domestic, which are not reflected in the table, were $5.2 million, $3.6 million$1.9, $2.2 and $3.0 million$3.4 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

(2)

In determining Incomeincome before Income Taxes,income taxes, the Company allocated interest expense, investment earnings, and other income (expense) were allocated among the segments based upon each segment’s relative operating profit.Income from Operations.

(3)

Corporate segment consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates from Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx.

42


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Product line revenues for external customers for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 were as follows:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010   2009 

Household Products

  $1,295.0    $1,207.4    $1,196.4  

 

$

1,466.2

 

 

$

1,436.1

 

 

$

1,411.3

 

Personal Care Products

   684.1     678.7     685.3  

 

 

1,005.4

 

 

 

977.4

 

 

 

745.6

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Consumer Domestic

   1,979.1     1,886.1     1,881.7  

 

 

2,471.6

 

 

 

2,413.5

 

 

 

2,156.9

 

Total Consumer International

   509.1     444.0     393.7  

 

 

535.2

 

 

 

532.8

 

 

 

510.1

 

Total SPD

   261.1     259.1     245.5  

 

 

290.8

 

 

 

248.0

 

 

 

254.9

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Consolidated Net Sales

  $2,749.3    $2,589.2    $2,520.9  

 

$

3,297.6

 

 

$

3,194.3

 

 

$

2,921.9

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Household Products include deodorizing, cleaning and laundry products.  Personal Care Products include condoms, pregnancy kits, oral care products, skin care products and gummy dietary supplements.

Consumer Domestic

20112014 compared to 20102013

Consumer Domestic net sales in 20112014 were $1,979.1 million,$2,471.6, an increase of $93.0 million$58.1 or 4.9%2.4% compared to net sales of $1,886.1 million$2,413.5 in 2010.2013.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Sales - Consumer Domestic

December 31,
2011

2014

Product volumes sold

4.4

3.5

%

PricingPricing/Product mix

(0.71.5

%)

Change in customer delivery arrangementsAcquired product lines(1)

(0.3

0.4

%

Net Sales increase

2.4

%

(1)Associated with net sales of the brands acquired in the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition since the date of acquisition.

The increase in net sales includes the new product launches of ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL clumping cat litter and OXICLEAN liquid laundry detergent, and higher sales of OXICLEAN laundry additive products, TROJAN products, VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplements and ORAJEL oral analgesics, partially offset by lower sales in XTRA laundry detergent, L’IL CRITTER gummy dietary supplements and ARM & HAMMER powder and unit dose laundry detergents.

Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has been significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category, contributing to an overall category decline.  During 2013, the category declined by 3.2%.  In 2014, the Procter & Gamble Company, one of the Company’s major competitors and the market leader in laundry detergent, took several competitive actions, including launching a lower-priced line of laundry detergents that competes directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents.  This, together with expected ongoing weak consumer spending and aggressive price competition by other laundry competitors that somewhat abated as of the end of December 2014, has negatively impacted the Company’s laundry detergent business.  Over the last twelve months, the category declined 2.9%.  The Company is vigorously combating these pressures through, among other things, significant new product introductions and increased marketing spending.  There is no assurance that the category will not decline further and that the Company will be able to offset any such category decline.

Consumer Domestic income before income taxes for 2014 was $502.8, a $1.8 increase as compared to 2013.  The increase is due to higher sales volumes, manufacturing costs savings resulting from productivity improvement projects and lower SG&A costs, partially offset by the impact of introductory and higher trade promotion, coupon and marketing costs in support of new product launches and existing products, higher commodity costs and an intangible asset impairment charge.

43


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

2013 compared to 2012

Consumer Domestic net sales in 2013 were $2,413.5, an increase of $256.6 or 11.9% compared to net sales of $2,156.9 in 2012.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

December 31,

Net Sales - Consumer Domestic

2013

Product volumes sold

4.4

%

Pricing/Product mix

(2.5

%)

Acquired product lines(1)

1.3

Divested product lines(2)

9.6

(0.2

%

Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade

0.4

%

Net Sales increase

 

 

Net Sales increase

4.9

11.9

%

(1)

(1)

On June 4, 2010,October 1, 2012, the Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE product line,L’IL CRITTERS and in late December 2010, acquired the FELINE PINE product line.VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business.  Net sales of these acquired product lines subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s segment results. (See Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)

(2)Product lines divested included the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010.

HigherThe increase in net sales reflects sales from the gummy dietary supplement business and higher sales of ARM & HAMMER liquid laundry detergent, OXICLEAN laundry additives, TROJAN products and FIRST RESPONSE diagnostic kits, partially offset by sales declines in ARM & HAMMER powder laundry detergent, XTRA liquid laundry detergent, SPINBRUSH battery operated toothbrushes, and ARM & HAMMER SUPER SCOOP cat litter, and saleslitter.  Sales in the first quarter of acquired product lines2012 were offset by lower salesnegatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of OXICLEAN laundry additive, ARM & HAMMER Dental Care and other toothpaste products.2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.

Consumer Domestic Incomeincome before Income Taxesincome taxes for 20112013 was $386.0 million,$501.0, a $44.2 million$72.2 increase as compared to 2010.2012.  The 2011 increase is due primarily to the contribution from the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business (net of higher interest expense), the impact of higher productsales volumes sold, the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, and lower allocated interest expense,manufacturing costs resulting from productivity improvement projects, partially offset by higher commoditytrade promotion and coupon costs, the effect of unfavorable product mix and higher trade promotion expenses. In addition, the 2011 increase reflects lowermarketing and SG&A primarily because 2010 SG&A included a charge related to the settlement of the Company’s U.S. pension plan obligations.expenses.

2010Consumer International

2014 compared to 20092013

Consumer DomesticInternational net sales in 20102014 were $1,886.1 million,$535.2, an increase of $4.3 million$2.4 or 0.2%0.5% as compared to net sales of $1,881.7 million in 2009.2013.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Sales - Consumer DomesticInternational

December 31,
2010

2014

Product volumes sold

5.6

3.1

%

Pricing and salesPricing/Product mix

(3.5%) 

Change in customer delivery arrangements and allowances

(1.2%) 

Acquired product lines(1)

0.6

Divested product lines(2)

(1.3%) 

 

 

0.2

%

Net Sales increaseForeign exchange rate fluctuations

0.2

 

 

(2.7

%)

Acquired product lines(1)

0.4

%

Other

(0.5

%)

Net Sales increase

0.5

%

(1)

On June 4, 2010, the Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE product line, and in late December 2010, acquired the FELINE PINE product line. Net

Associated with net sales of acquired product lines subsequent to the acquisition are includedbrands acquired in the Company’s segment results. (See Note 6 toLil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition since the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)date of acquisition.

(2)Product lines divested included the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010, and ancillary products divested in the third quarter of 2009 that initially were acquired in connection with the Orajel Acquisition.

Higher sales in 2014 occurred primarily in Europe and Mexico.

Consumer International income before income taxes was $64.7 in 2014, an increase of ARM & HAMMER liquid laundry detergent, ARM & HAMMER SUPER SCOOP cat litter, TROJAN condoms$0.2 compared to 2013 due primarily to higher volumes and KABOOM bathroom cleaner wereprices offset by lower salesthe effect of XTRA liquid laundry detergent, OXICLEAN laundry additive, SPINBRUSH toothbrushes, ARM & HAMMER powder detergent, ARRID antiperspirantforeign exchange rate changes and other oral care products.

Consumer Domestic Income before Income Taxes for 2010 was $341.9 million, a $16.2 million increase as compared to 2009. The 2010 increase is due to the impact of higher product volumes sold, cost efficiencies derived from the Company’s new manufacturing facility in York, Pennsylvania, lower costs associated with the North Brunswick, New Jersey plant and warehouse shutdown in 2009, lower manufacturing costs, lower marketing costs, lower SG&A costs and lower allocated interest expense, partially offset by higher trade promotion, commodity and slotting expensesmarketing costs.

44


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and higher SG&A costs primarily related to the settlement of the U.S. Pension Plan obligations.per share data)

Consumer International

20112013 compared to 20102012

Consumer International net sales in 20112013 were $509.1 million,$532.8, an increase of $65.1 million$22.7 or 14.7%4.5% as compared to 2010.2012.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Sales - Consumer International

December 31,
2011

2013

Product volumes sold

4.3

2.8

%

PricingPricing/Product mix

(0.2

0.9

%

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

5.4

(2.3

%)

Acquired product lines(1)

2.0

Divested products(2)

(0.1%) 

Change in fiscal calendar(3)

3.3

 

 

3.1

%

Net Sales increase

14.7

 

 

4.5

%

(1)

On June 28, 2011,October 1, 2012, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo product lineL’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business.  Net sales of thisthese product linelines subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s segmentConsumer International results. (See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)

(2)Product lines divested included the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010.
(3)Beginning in 2012, the Company’s quarterly periods changed to a calendar year reporting basis. To facilitate this change, the fourth quarter of 2011 included an additional period of reporting for those three subsidiaries outside of North America that used to report one month prior to period presented. This change resulted in increasing 2011 net sales by $14.3 million or 3.3% and had a nominal impact on net income for the year.

Higher sales volumes in 2013 occurred primarily in Mexico, Canada, Australia,Brazil, United Kingdom and Mexico, as well as higher U.S. exports, contributed to the sales increase.exports.

Consumer International income before income taxes was $68.9 million$64.5 in 2011,2013, a decrease of $6.5 compared to 2012 caused by unfavorable foreign exchange rates, a trade name impairment charge and marketing expenses, partially offset by the contribution from the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business, higher sales volume and favorable price/mix.

Specialty Products

2014 compared to 2013

SPD net sales were $290.8 for 2014, an increase of $16.3 million compared to 2010. Higher profits are attributable to the higher sales volume, the effect of foreign exchange rates and lower allocated interest expense, partially offset by unfavorable pricing and sales mix and higher shipping costs. The additional fiscal period did not have a material effect on income before taxes.

2010 compared to 2009

Consumer International net sales in 2010 were $444.0 million, an increase of $50.3 million$42.8, or 12.8%17.3% as compared to 2009.2013.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Consumer InternationalSales - SPD

December 31,
2010

2014

Product volumes sold

8.3

17.3

%

Pricing and salesPricing/Product mix

(1.2

2.2

%

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

5.9

(1.0

%)

AcquiredDivested product lines(1)

0.1

Divested products(2)

(0.3%) 

 

 

(1.2

%)

Net Sales increase

12.8

 

 

17.3

%

(1)On June 4, 2010, the Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE product line. Net sales of this product line subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s segment results. (See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information.)
(2)Product lines divested included the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, which were divested in the first quarter of 2010, and ancillary products divested in the third quarter of 2009 that initially were acquired in connection with the Orajel Acquisition.

Higher unitThe sales increase in 2014 reflects higher sales volume of animal nutrition products and performance products.  The animal nutrition business’s strong performance is primarily related to the strength of the U.S. dairy industry, which has experienced all time high milk prices and low input commodity costs, prompting dairy producers to feed more animal nutrition products and produce higher volumes were generated in Canada, Australia, France, the United Kingdom and Brazil.of milk per cow.

Consumer InternationalSPD income before income taxes was $52.6 million$45.8 in 2010,2014, an increase of $14.0 million$16.4 as compared to 2009. Higher profits are attributable2013.  The increase in income before income taxes for 2014 is due primarily to the higher sales volume and favorable exchange rates on U.S. dollar purchases of inventorysales prices and the translation of foreign financial statements to U.S. dollars, partially offset by higherlower SG&A and marketing costs.

Specialty Products45


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

2011(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

2013 compared to 20102012

Specialty ProductsSPD net sales were $261.1 million$248.0 for 2011, an increase2013, a decrease of $2.0 million,$6.9, or 0.8%2.7% as compared to 2010.2012.  The components of the net sales change are the following:

 

December 31,

Net Sales—Sales - SPD

December 31,
2011

2013

Product volumes sold

(0.3

0.0

%

PricingPricing/Product mix

7.7

(1.8

%)

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

0.8

Divested product lines(1)

(0.1%) 

Discontinued product line

(1.3

(7.7

%)

Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade

0.4

%

Net Sales decrease

 

 

Net Sales increase

0.8

(2.7

%)

(1)Product lines divested include the BRILLO product line, which was divested in the first quarter of 2010.

The pricing increasesales decrease in 20112013 reflects higherreduced product sales prices in response to raw material increases primarily in theof animal nutrition and performance products, businesses. The sales volume decrease reflects lower U.S. exports. The discontinued product line reflects the Company’s decision in late 2010 to cease a foreign subsidiary’s sale of a certain chemical product line.

Specialty Products Income before Income Taxes for 2011 was $29.7 million, an increase of $10.9 million as compared to 2010. The increase in income in 2011 reflects the profits on higher net sales and lower allocated interest expense partially offset by higher raw material costs. Income before taxesbulk sales of sodium bicarbonate.  Colder than normal weather during the second quarter of 2013 negatively impacted demand from the dairy industry.  In addition, the decrease in 2011 also includes $3.0 millionnet sales of 2013 was offset by the adverse impact in charges associated with the Company’s decision to exitfirst quarter of 2012 of a timing shift in customer orders from the chemical business in Brazil. Income before Taxes in 2010 includes expensesfirst quarter of $9.7 million associated with an increase in environmental reserves of $4.9 million and an impairment and plant shutdown charge of $4.8 million, both related2012 to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary. Costfourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.

SPD income before income taxes was $29.5 in 2013, a decrease of $4.3 as compared to 2012.  The decrease in the income before income taxes for 2013 is due primarily to lower selling prices for animal nutrition products, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses.

Corporate

The Corporate segment reflects the administrative costs of the production, planning and logistics functions which are included in SG&A expenses in the operating segments but are elements of cost of sales in 2010 includes $7.6 millionthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of these chargesIncome.  Such amounts were $26.7, $31.3, and SG&A includes the remaining $2.1 million.$29.4 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  

2010 compared to 2009

Specialty Products net sales were $259.1 million for 2010, an increaseAlso included in Corporate are equity in earnings (losses) of $13.6 million, or 5.6% as compared to 2009. The components of the net sales change are the following:

Net Sales— Specialty Products Division

December 31,
2010

Product volumes sold

0.3

Pricing and sales mix

3.4

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations

2.2

Divested product lines(1)

(0.3%) 

Net Sales increase

5.6

(1)Product lines divested include the BRILLO product line, which was divested in the first quarter of 2010.

The pricingaffiliates from Armand, ArmaKleen and sales mix increase in 2010 reflects higher sales prices in response to raw material increases primarily in the animal nutrition business. Product volume increases were realized in the animal nutrition business.

Specialty Products Income before Income Taxes for 2010 was $18.8 million, an increase of $2.8 million as compared to 2009.Natronx.  The increase in incomeequity in 2010 reflects the profits on higher net sales andearnings of affiliates in 2014 is primarily due to a favorable foreign exchange rate$3.2 impairment charge associated with the Brazilian Real. Income before taxes in 2010 also includes expensesone of $9.7 million associated with an increase in environmental reserves of $4.9 million and an impairment and plant shutdown charge of $4.8 million, both related to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary. Cost of sales includes $7.6 million of these chargesaffiliates in 2013 and SG&A includes the remaining $2.1 million. In 2009 these items totaled approximately $9.9 million.profitability from Armand.    

Liquidity and capital resources

As of December 31, 2011,2014, the Company had $251.4 million$423.0 in cash and cash equivalents, approximately $500 million$450 available through the revolving facility under its revolving credit facilityCredit Agreement and its commercial paper program, and a commitment increase feature under the Credit Agreement that enables the Company to borrow up to an additional $500, million, subject to lending commitments of the participating lenders and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement.  To enhance the safety ofpreserve its cash resources,liquidity, the Company invests its cash primarily in prime money market funds.funds and short term bank deposits.

As of December 31, 2011,2014, the amount of cash and cash equivalents included in the Company’s consolidated cash,assets, that was held by foreign subsidiaries was approximately $113 million.$245.3.  From an income tax perspective, the Company has undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries of approximately $315.4, at December 31, 2014, for which U.S. deferred taxes have not been provided.  If these funds are needed for operations in the U.S., the Company will be required to accrue and pay taxes in the U.S. to repatriate these funds.  However, theThe Company’s intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside the U.S., and the Company’s current plans doCompany does not indicate a needcurrently expect to repatriate them to fund operations in the U.S.

In the third quarter of 2011,  However, the Company entered intocontinues to monitor external events or circumstances and may change its intention to remit undistributed earnings if it can be achieved in a manner that results in a tax-neutral impact to the Company.  External events or circumstances include movement in interest or currency exchange rates. For example, if the exchange rate between the Euro/USD declined, the Company would re-evaluate its intentions to remit earnings of approximately $200, which approximates $70 of cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries.

On December 19, 2014, the Company replaced its former $500 credit facility with a $600 unsecured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”).  Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has the ability to increase its borrowing up to an agreement with two banksadditional $500, subject to establish alender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement.  

46


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

The Credit Agreement supports the Company’s $500 commercial paper program (the “Program”).  Total combined borrowing for both the Credit Agreement and the Program may not exceed $600.  Unless extended, the Credit Agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on December 19, 2019.  

On December 9, 2014, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $300 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due December 15, 2019 (the “2019 Notes”).  The details2019 Notes were issued under the first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 9, 2014, to the indenture dated December 9, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee.  Interest on the 2019 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning June 15, 2015.  The 2019 Notes will mature on December 15, 2019, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the program are discussed in more detail inFirst Supplemental Indenture.

On September 26, 2012, the sectionCompany closed an underwritten public offering of $400 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”).  The 2022 Notes were issued under “Recent Developments.”

the second supplemental indenture, dated September 26, 2012 (the “BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture”), to the indenture dated December 15, 2010 (the “BNY Mellon Base Indenture”) between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.  Interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning April 1, 2013.  The 2022 Notes will mature on October 1, 2022, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture.  The Company used $250 from commercial paper issuances, along with the $400 of 2022 Notes and cash, to purchase the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplement business on October 1, 2012.

On December 15, 2010, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of $250 aggregate principal amount of 3.35% Senior Notes due 2015 (the “2015 Notes”).  The 2015 Notes were issued under the BNY Mellon Base Indenture, and a first supplemental indenture, (the “BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 15, 2010, between the Company and BNY Mellon, as trustee.  On December 30, 2010, the proceeds of the offering were utilized to retire the outstanding $250 principal amount of the Company’s 6% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012.  Interest on the 2015 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2011.  The 2015 Notes will mature on December 15, 2015, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture.

The current economic environment presents risks that could have adverse consequences for the Company’s liquidity.  (See “Economic“Unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect our business”demand for the Company’s products” under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.1A of this Annual Report.)  The Company does not anticipate that current economic conditions will adversely affect its ability to comply with the financial covenantscovenant in its principal credit facilitiesthe Credit Agreement because the Company currently is, and anticipates that it will continue to be, in compliance with the minimum interest coverage ratio requirement and the maximum leverage ratio requirement under the Credit Agreement. These financial ratios are discussed in more detail in this section under “Certain Financial Covenants.”

On February 7, 2011,January 28, 2015, the Board of Directors increaseddeclared an 8% increase in the Company’s regular quarterly dividend from $0.085 per share$0.31 to $0.17$0.335 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $0.68$1.34 per share commencing withas of February 10, 2015.  The decision raises the dividend payable on March 1, 2011. The higher dividend raised the annualizedannual dividend payout from approximately $49 million$168 to approximately $97 million. $177.

On February 1, 2012,January 29, 2014, the Board of Directors again increasedauthorized the 2014 Share Repurchase Program.  The 2014 Share Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s regular quarterly dividendshare repurchase program announced on November 5, 2012.  In addition, the Board authorized an evergreen share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase, from $0.17 per sharetime to $0.24 per share, equivalenttime, Common Stock to an annual dividend ratereduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of $0.96 per share, commencing with the dividend payable on March 1, 2012 to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 21, 2012. The higher dividend raisesCommon Stock under the Company’s annualized dividend payout fromincentive plans.

In 2014, the Company purchased 6.9 million shares of its Common Stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $97$479.  Approximately $393 was purchased under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program and $86 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase program.

As part of the evergreen share repurchase program, in early January 2015, the Company purchased 0.5 million shares of Common Stock at a cost of approximately $41.2.  The Company used cash on hand to approximately $137 million.fund the purchase price.  

On August 3, 2011,January 28, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.  The 2015 Share Repurchase Program replaced the 2014 Share Repurchase Program and the Company continued its evergreen share repurchase of up to $300 millionprogram.

As part of the Company’s2015 Share Repurchase Program and the evergreen share repurchase program, in early February 2015, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase contract with a commercial bank to purchase $215 of Common Stock.  The detailsCompany paid $215 to the bank and received an initial delivery of approximately 2.6 million shares of Common Stock. The contract will be settled by mid-May 2015.  If the Company is required to deliver value to the commercial bank at the end of the program are discussedpurchase period, the Company, at its option, may elect to settle in detailshares of Common Stock or cash.

47


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Of the section2015 share repurchases, approximately $88.0 was purchased under “ Recent Developments.”the Company’s evergreen share repurchase program.

The Company anticipates that its cash from operations, together with its current borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to meet its capital expenditure program costs, which are expected to be approximately $70 to 75 million$70.0 in 2012,2015, fund its stock buy-back programshare repurchase programs to the extent implemented by management and pay dividends at the latest approved rate and meet its contractual obligation to contribute upwards of an additional $17 million to Natronx for additional capital development. Included in the estimated capital expenditures for 2012 is $11 million forrate.  Cash, together with the Company’s global information systems upgrade project and $24 million for completing a West Coast manufacturing and distribution facility in Victorville, California. Specifically, the Company will be relocating its cat litter manufacturing operations and a distribution center from its Green River, Wyoming facility. The new site also will include a liquid laundry production line. The Company plans to invest a total of approximately $35 million in capital expenditures and incur approximately $7 million in transition expenses in connection with the opening of the Victorville site and costs associated with anticipated changes at the Green River facility. The transition expenses include anticipated severance costs and accelerated depreciation of equipment at the Company’s Green River facility and one-time project expenses.

As a result of the 2010 refinancing activities, the Company did not have any mandatory debt payments in 2011 and will not have any in 2012. Cashcurrent borrowing capacity, may be used for acquisitions that would complement the Company’s existing product lines or geographic markets.  The Company did not have any mandatory fixed rate debt principal payments in 2014. In 2015, the Company is required to pay $250.0 for the 2015 Notes (net of discounts) when the notes mature on December 15, 2015.  The Company expects to use cash generated from operations to retire the debt.

Net Debt

The Company had outstanding total debt of $252.3 million$1,095.2 and cash of $251.4 million$423.0 at December 31, 2011,2014, resulting in net debt of $0.9 million$672.2 at December 31, 2011.2014.  This compares to total debt of $339.7 million$803.3 and cash of $189.2 million,$496.9, resulting in net debt of $150.5 million$306.4 at December 31, 2010.2013.  Net debt is defined as total debt, minus cash less total debt.and cash equivalents.

Cash Flow Analysis

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  Year Ending December 31, 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 2009 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $437.8   $428.5   $400.9  

 

$

540.3

 

 

$

499.6

 

 

$

523.6

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  $(147.8 $(180.4 $(104.1

 

$

(288.4

)

 

$

(77.1

)

 

$

(741.3

)

Net cash used in financing activities

  $(226.5 $(503.7 $(58.3

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

$

(306.6

)

 

$

(259.8

)

 

$

305.2

 

2014 compared to 2013

Net Cash Provided by Operating ActivitiesThe Company’s net cash provided by operating activities in 20112014 increased $9.3 million$40.7 to $437.8 million$540.3 as compared to 2010. The increase was primarily2013 due to higher net income higher deferred income taxes primarily due to bonus depreciation on capital additions and a decreaseslight increase in working capital (exclusivecapital.  Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 was negatively affected by the deferred payment of cash).

For the year ended December 31, 2011,fourth quarter 2012 federal tax obligation of $36.0 as allowed by the components of working capital that significantly affected operating cash flow are as follows:

Accounts receivable increased $35.3 millionIRS due to the timingimpact of customer shipments.Hurricane Sandy.

Inventories increased $9.0 million primarily due to increases in raw material costs and build-up of inventories to address expected higher customer orders in anticipation of the information systems upgrade.

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses increased $27.4 million primarily due to the timing of payments and higher marketing accruals, offset by lower incentive and profit sharing accruals.

Income taxes payable increased $19.1 million due to the timing of payments and higher earnings.

Net Cash Used in Investing ActivitiesNet cash used in investing activities during 20112014 was $147.8 million,$288.4, principally reflecting the $64.8 million acquisition of$215.7 paid for the BATISTE brand, $4.3 million of oral care technology license acquisitions, $3.2 million investment in Natronx,Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition and $76.6 million$70.5 of property, plant and equipment expenditures partially offset by $1.6 million in payments received on outstanding notes receivable, and state government grants of $1.7 million received in connection with the York, Pennsylvania facility.expenditures.

Net Cash Used in(Used in) Provided by Financing ActivitiesNet cash used in financing activities during 20112014 was $226.5 million,$306.6, primarily reflecting $478.8 of repurchases of Common Stock, $167.5 of cash dividend payments and $6.7 net repayments of short-term debt offset by an increase in long-term debt of $299.8 for the 2019 Notes, and $51.2 of proceeds and tax benefits from stock option exercises.

2013 compared to 2012

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities – The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 decreased $24.0 to $499.6 as compared to 2012.  The Company was able to defer its fourth quarter 2012 federal tax payment of $36.0 to the first quarter of 2013 as allowed by the IRS due to the impact of Hurricane Sandy, which accounted for the decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in 2013.  Partially offsetting the decrease was a reduction in working capital (higher accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by higher accounts receivable).  

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities – Net cash used in investing activities during 2013 was $77.1, principally reflecting the repayment$67.1 of $90.0 millionproperty, plant and equipment expenditures and a $6.4 investment in borrowings under the Company’s former accounts receivable securitization facility, $97.4 million to payNatronx.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities – Net cash dividends and $80.2 million of treasury stock purchases. Cash used in financing activities alsoduring 2013 was $259.8, primarily reflecting $100.0 of repayments of commercial paper, $50.1 of repurchases of Common Stock and $155.2 of cash dividends, partially offset by $35.1 of proceeds of and tax benefits from stock option exercises aggregating $39.2 million and international borrowingsthe receipt of $2.6 million.an incentive payment of $10.9 related to the financing lease for the Company’s new corporate headquarters.

Certain 48


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Financial CovenantsCovenant

“Consolidated EBITDA” (referred to below as “Adjusted EBITDA”) and defined in the Credit Agreement that was revised in December 2014) is a component of the financial covenantscovenant contained in and is defined in, the Company’s Credit Agreement.  Financial covenants includeThe financial covenant includes a leverage ratio (total debt to Adjusted EBITDA) and an interest coverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA to total interest expense), which, if not met, could result in an event of default and trigger the early termination of the Credit Agreement.  Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities which is determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.U.S.  The Company’s leverage ratio for the twelve months ended December 31, 20112014 was 0.5,1.5, which is below the maximum of 3.25 permitted under the Credit Agreement, and the interest coverage ratio for the twelve months ending December 31, 2011 was 65.3, which is above the minimum of 3.003.5 permitted under the Credit Agreement.  See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for further information relating to the Credit Agreement.

The reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure) to Adjusted EBITDA for 20112014 is as follows:

 

(In millions)

    

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

  $437.8  

Interest paid

   9.2  

Current Income Tax Provision

   125.6  

Excess Tax Benefit on Stock Options Exercised

   12.1  

Change in Working Capital and Other Liabilities

   11.0  

Adjustments for Significant Acquisitions / Dispositions—net

   3.9  
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA (per Credit Agreement)

  $599.6  
  

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 

$

540.3

 

Interest paid

 

 

25.7

 

Current Income Tax Provision

 

 

198.3

 

Excess Tax Benefit on Stock Options Exercised

 

 

18.5

 

Change in Working Capital and Other Liabilities

 

 

(13.5

)

Adjusted EBITDA (per Credit Agreement)

 

$

769.3

 

Commitments as of December 31, 20112014

The table below summarizes the Company’s material contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011.2014.

 

   Payments Due by Period 

(In millions)

  Total   2012   2013 to
2014
   2015 to
2016
   After
2016
 

Short & Long-Term Debt

          

3.35% Senior Note

  $250.0    $0.0    $0.0    $250.0    $0.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   250.0     0.0     0.0     250.0     0.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest on Fixed Rate Debt(1)

   33.6     8.4     16.8     8.4     0.0  

Lease Obligations

   210.4     24.1     40.2     26.8     119.3  

Other Long-Term Liabilities

          

Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds(2)

   4.1     4.1     0.0     0.0     0.0  

Pension Contributions(3)

   3.6     3.6     0.0     0.0     0.0  

Purchase Obligations(4)

   130.6     76.4     52.0     2.2     0.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $632.3    $116.6    $109.0    $287.4    $119.3  
  

��

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 to

 

 

2018 to

 

 

After

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2015

 

 

2017

 

 

2019

 

 

2019

 

Short & Long-Term Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.35% Senior Notes due 2015

 

$

250.0

 

 

$

250.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

2.45% Senior Notes due 2019

 

 

300.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

300.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

2.875% Senior Notes due 2022

 

 

400.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

400.0

 

Commercial paper issuances

 

 

143.3

 

 

 

143.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Debt obligations of foreign subsidiaries

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

1,096.7

 

 

 

396.7

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

300.0

 

 

 

400.0

 

Interest on Fixed Rate Debt(1)

 

 

137.2

 

 

 

27.3

 

 

 

37.7

 

 

 

37.7

 

 

 

34.5

 

Lease Obligations

 

 

196.4

 

 

 

25.5

 

 

 

38.8

 

 

 

32.2

 

 

 

99.9

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds(2)

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Pension Contributions(3)

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Purchase Obligations(4)

 

 

226.9

 

 

 

156.1

 

 

 

60.3

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

4.9

 

Other(5)

 

 

19.2

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

7.5

 

Total

 

$

1,683.4

 

 

$

617.9

 

 

$

142.2

 

 

$

376.5

 

 

$

546.8

 

(1)

Represents interest on the Company’s 3.35% senior notesSenior Notes due in 2015.2015, 2.45% Senior Notes due in 2019 and 2.875% Senior Notes due in 2022.

(2)

Letters of credit with several banks guarantee payment for items such as insurance claims in the event of the Company’s insolvency and one year of rent on a warehouse.insolvency.  Performance Bondsbonds are principally for required municipal property improvements.

(3)

Pension contributions are based on actuarial assessments of government regulated employer funding requirements.

These requirements are not projected beyond one year since they fluctuate with the change in plan assets, assumptions and demographics.

(4)

The Company has outstanding purchase obligations with suppliers at the end of 20112014 for raw, packaging and other materials and services in the normal course of business.  These purchase obligation amounts represent only those items which are based on agreements that are enforceable and legally binding, and do not represent total anticipated purchases.

(5)

Other includes payments for stadium naming rights for a period of 20 years until December 2032.

49


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

The Company has excluded from the table above uncertain tax liabilities due to the uncertainty of the amount per period of payment.  AsThe Company’s liabilities for uncertain income tax positions are $4.0 as of December 31, 2011, the Company has gross uncertain tax liabilities, including interest, of $13.8 million (see2014.  (See Note 1210 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report)Annual Report).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have off-balance sheet financing or unconsolidated special purpose entities.

OTHER ITEMS

Market risk

Concentration of Risk

In eachA group of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010three customers accounted for approximately 36%, 35% and 2009,34% of consolidated net sales to the Company’s largestin 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which a single customer, Wal-Mart, Stores, Inc.accounted for approximately 25%, 24% and its affiliates were 23%, 23%24% in 2014, 2013 and 22%2012, respectively of the Company’s total consolidated net sales.

.  

Interest Rate Risk

The Company has significantly reduced its interest rate risk as a result of its refinancing activities in 2010. The Company had outstanding total debt at December 31, 20112014, of $252.3 million,$1,096.2, of which $249.7 million carries87% has a fixed weighted average interest rate of 2.87% and the remaining 13% constituted principally commercial paper issued by the Company that currently has a weighted average interest at 3.35% and $2.6 millionrate of short term debt hasless than 0.5%.  In December 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements on an aggregate notional amount of $300 to convert the fixed interest rate on the 2019 Notes to a variable interest rates. Should the Company need to use its revolving credit facility, it would consider entering into hedge agreements to mitigate the interest rate risk, if conditions warrant.rate.

Diesel Fuel HedgeHedges

The Company uses independent freight carriers to deliver its products.  These carriers currently charge the Company a basic rate per mile that is subject to a mileage surcharge for diesel fuel price increases.  During 2011,2013 and 2014, the Company entered into hedge agreements with financial counterparties.counterparties to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices, and not to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel.  Under the hedge agreements, the Company agreed to pay a fixed price per gallon of diesel fuel determined at the time the agreements were executed and to receive a floating rate payment reflecting the variable common carriers’ mileage surcharge. The floating rate paymentthat is determined on a monthly basis based on the average price of the Department of Energy’s Diesel Fuel Index price during the applicable month and is designed to offset any increase or decrease in fuel surcharge paymentscosts that the Company pays to it common carriers.  The agreements covercovered approximately 35%57% of the Company’s 2014 diesel fuel requirements and are expected to cover approximately 63% and 16% of the Company’s estimated diesel fuel requirements for 20112015 and 33% of the Company’s total 20122016, respectively.  These diesel fuel requirements. The Company uses the hedge agreements to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges, and not to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel. These agreements qualify for hedge accounting.accounting.  Therefore, changes in the fair value of diesel fuel hedgesuch agreements are recorded inunder Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on the balance sheet.

Foreign Currency

The Company is subject to exposure from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily U.S. Dollar/Euro, U.S. Dollar/British Pound, U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Mexican Peso, U.S. Dollar/Australian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Brazilian Real and U.S. Dollar/Chinese Yuan.

The Company, from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in the U.S. dollar,Dollar, Canadian dollar,Dollar, British poundPound and Euro.  Certain of the Company’s subsidiariesThe Company entered into forward exchange contracts to protect the Companyit from the risk that, due to changes in currency exchange rates, it would be adversely affected by net cash outflows.  The face value of the unexpired contracts as of December 31, 20112014 totaled U.S. $30.3 million. All of these$53.3.  The contracts were designatedqualified as foreign currency cash flow hedges, and, qualified for hedge accounting and as a result,therefore, changes in the fair values from thesevalue of the contracts were recorded in Other Comprehensive Income during(Loss) and reclassified to earnings when the year ended December 31, 2011.hedged transaction affected earnings.  

Equity Derivatives

The Company has entered into equity derivative contracts covering its own stock in order to minimize its liability, resulting from changes in quoted fair values of Company stock, to participants underin its Executive Deferred Compensation Plan who have investments under that plan in a notional Company stock fund.  The contracts are typically settled in cash.  Since the equity derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting, the Company is required to mark the agreements to market throughout the life of the agreements and record changes in fair value in the consolidated statement of income.

50


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

ITEMITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information appears under the heading “Market Risk” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section.   Refer to page 4850 of this annual report on Form 10-K.Annual Report.


ITEMITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Church & Dwight Co., IncInc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.2014.  In making this assessment, management used the framework established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2011,2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Their opinions on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedulesschedule appear on pages 5153 and 5254 of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

 

/s/ JAMES R. CRAIGIE        

/s/    MATTHEW T. FARRELL        
James R. Craigie

/s/ Matthew T. Farrell

James R. Craigie

Matthew T. Farrell

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

February 20, 2015

February 24, 2012


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of


Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Princeton,
Ewing, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011.2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries atas of December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011,2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presentspresent fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 201220, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, NJ

February 24, 2012

February 20, 2015


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of


Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Princeton,
Ewing, New Jersey

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’scompany's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’scompany's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 20112014 of the Company and our report dated February 24, 201220, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, NJ
February 24, 2012

Parsippany, NJ

February 20, 2015


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In millions, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions, except per share data)

  2011 2010 2009 

Net Sales

  $2,749.3   $2,589.2   $2,520.9  

 

$

3,297.6

 

 

$

3,194.3

 

 

$

2,921.9

 

Cost of sales

   1,534.8    1,431.4    1,419.9  

 

 

1,844.7

 

 

 

1,756.3

 

 

 

1,630.5

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross Profit

   1,214.5    1,157.8    1,101.0  

 

 

1,452.9

 

 

 

1,438.0

 

 

 

1,291.4

 

Marketing expenses

   354.1    338.0    353.6  

 

 

416.9

 

 

 

399.8

 

 

 

357.3

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   367.8    374.8    354.5  

 

 

394.8

 

 

 

416.0

 

 

 

389.0

 

Patent litigation settlement, net

   0.0    0.0    (20.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from Operations

   492.6    445.0    412.9  

 

 

641.2

 

 

 

622.2

 

 

 

545.1

 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   10.0    5.0    12.1  

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

8.9

 

Investment earnings

   1.9    0.6    1.3  

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

1.7

 

Other income, net

   (1.2  (4.5  1.5  

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

0.8

 

Interest expense

   (8.7  (27.8  (35.6

 

 

(27.4

)

 

 

(27.7

)

 

 

(14.0

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before Income Taxes

   494.6    418.3    392.2  

 

 

624.9

 

 

 

597.8

 

 

 

542.5

 

Income taxes

   185.0    147.6    148.7  

 

 

211.0

 

 

 

203.4

 

 

 

192.7

 

Net Income

 

$

413.9

 

 

$

394.4

 

 

$

349.8

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

   309.6    270.7    243.5  

Noncontrolling interest

   0.0    0.0    0.0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

  $309.6   $270.7   $243.5  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic

   143.2    142.0    140.8  

Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted

   145.8    144.4    143.0  

Net income per share—Basic

  $2.16   $1.91   $1.73  

Net income per share—Diluted

  $2.12   $1.87   $1.70  

Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic

 

 

135.1

 

 

 

138.6

 

 

 

140.1

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted

 

 

137.5

 

 

 

141.2

 

 

 

142.7

 

Net income per share - Basic

 

$

3.06

 

 

$

2.85

 

 

$

2.50

 

Net income per share - Diluted

 

$

3.01

 

 

$

2.79

 

 

$

2.45

 

Cash dividends per share

  $0.68   $0.31   $0.23  

 

$

1.24

 

 

$

1.12

 

 

$

0.96

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net Income

 

$

413.9

 

 

$

394.4

 

 

$

349.8

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

 

 

(29.1

)

 

 

(10.1

)

 

 

5.6

 

Defined benefit plan adjustments

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

7.5

 

 

 

(5.2

)

Income (loss) from derivative agreements

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.8

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(34.9

)

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(0.4

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

379.0

 

 

$

392.1

 

 

$

349.4

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

  December 31,
2011
 December 31,
2010
 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Assets

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $251.4   $189.2  

 

$

423.0

 

 

$

496.9

 

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $1.8 and $5.5

   264.6    231.1  

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $1.9 and $0.8

 

 

322.9

 

 

 

330.2

 

Inventories

   200.7    195.4  

 

 

245.9

 

 

 

250.5

 

Deferred income taxes

   6.0    16.3  

 

 

14.4

 

 

 

16.6

 

Other current assets

   32.5    17.5  

 

 

26.3

 

 

 

21.6

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Current Assets

   755.2    649.5  

 

 

1,032.5

 

 

 

1,115.8

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

   506.0    468.3  

 

 

616.2

 

 

 

594.1

 

Equity Investment in Affiliates

   12.0    9.2  

 

 

24.8

 

 

 

24.5

 

Tradenames and Other Intangibles

   904.1    872.5  

Trade Names and Other Intangibles, Net

 

 

1,272.4

 

 

 

1,204.3

 

Goodwill

   868.4    857.4  

 

 

1,325.0

 

 

 

1,222.2

 

Other Assets

   71.9    88.3  

 

 

110.4

 

 

 

98.8

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Assets

  $3,117.6   $2,945.2  

 

$

4,381.3

 

 

$

4,259.7

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

  $2.6   $90.0  

 

$

146.7

 

 

$

153.8

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

249.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   379.3    355.3  

 

 

507.7

 

 

 

495.1

 

Income taxes payable

   1.7    1.8  

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

2.3

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   383.6    447.1  

 

 

905.3

 

 

 

651.2

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Debt

   249.7    249.7  

 

 

698.6

 

 

 

649.5

 

Deferred Income Taxes

   292.3    254.3  

 

 

484.1

 

 

 

476.0

 

Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities

   106.2    85.2  

 

 

163.1

 

 

 

157.5

 

Pension, Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits

   45.0    38.0  

 

 

28.3

 

 

 

25.5

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Liabilities

   1,076.8    1,074.3  

 

 

2,279.4

 

 

 

1,959.7

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

   

Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value,

   

Authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued

   0.0    0.0  

Common Stock, $1.00 par value,

   

Authorized 300,000,000 shares; 146,427,550 shares issued

   146.4    146.4  

Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, Authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Common Stock, $1.00 par value, Authorized 300,000,000 shares; 146,427,550

shares issued

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

146.4

 

Additional paid-in capital

   271.7    230.8  

 

 

364.8

 

 

 

352.9

 

Retained earnings

   1,714.0    1,501.8  

 

 

2,414.9

 

 

 

2,168.5

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   2.9    16.3  

Common stock in treasury, at cost:

   

4,140,424 shares in 2011 and 4,018,000 shares in 2010

   (94.4  (24.6
  

 

  

 

 

Total Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stockholders’ Equity

   2,040.6    1,870.7  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(34.7

)

 

 

0.2

 

Common stock in treasury, at cost: 13,075,944 shares in 2014 and 7,462,913 shares

in 2013

 

 

(789.5

)

 

 

(368.1

)

Total Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stockholders' Equity

 

 

2,101.9

 

 

 

2,299.9

 

Noncontrolling interest

   0.2    0.2  

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.1

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity

   2,040.8    1,870.9  
  

 

  

 

 

Total Stockholders' Equity

 

 

2,101.9

 

 

 

2,300.0

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

  $3,117.6   $2,945.2  

 

$

4,381.3

 

 

$

4,259.7

 

  

 

  

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

 

   Year Ended December 31, 

(Dollars in millions)

  2011  2010  2009 

Cash Flow From Operating Activities

    

Net Income

  $309.6   $270.7   $243.5  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation expense

   49.8    44.1    56.9  

Amortization expense

   27.3    27.5    28.5  

Deferred income taxes

   59.4    38.9    23.1  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   0.0    4.5    0.0  

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   (10.0  (5.0  (12.0

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates

   10.5    8.7    9.3  

Non cash compensation expense

   11.0    11.8    12.7  

Other asset write-offs

   3.1    3.9    12.2  

Other

   0.2    (0.9  (3.7

Change in assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

   (35.3  (12.7  6.2  

Inventories

   (9.0  24.1    (10.5

Other current assets

   (6.1  1.9    (0.4

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   27.4    22.7    12.7  

Income taxes payable

   19.1    (7.6  17.4  

Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised

   (12.1  (7.3  (5.0

Other liabilities

   (7.1  3.2    10.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities

   437.8    428.5    400.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flow From Investing Activities

    

Proceeds from sale of assets

   0.0    8.2    30.1  

Additions to property, plant and equipment

   (76.6  (63.8  (135.4

Acquisitions

   (69.1  (126.0  0.0  

Investment interest in joint venture

   (3.2  0.0    0.0  

Proceeds from note receivable

   1.6    1.8    1.3  

Contingent acquisition payments

   (0.5  (0.6  (0.7

Other

   0.0    0.0    0.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

   (147.8  (180.4  (104.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flow From Financing Activities

    

Long-term debt borrowings

   0.0    249.7    0.0  

Long-term debt repayment

   0.0    (781.4  (71.5

Short-term debt repayments, net of borrowings

   (87.4  55.1    30.9  

Proceeds from stock options exercised

   27.1    16.0    10.0  

Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised

   12.1    7.2    5.0  

Payment of cash dividends

   (97.4  (44.0  (32.3

Purchase of treasury stock

   (80.2  (0.1  (0.4

Deferred financing costs

   (0.7  (6.2  0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Cash Used In Financing Activities

   (226.5  (503.7  (58.3

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (1.3  (2.3  10.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Change In Cash and Cash Equivalents

   62.2    (257.9  249.1  

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

   189.2    447.1    198.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $251.4   $189.2   $447.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW—CONTINUEDFLOW

(In millions)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2011  2010  2009 

Cash paid during the year for:

    

Interest (net of amounts capitalized)

  $9.2   $29.3   $29.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income taxes

  $108.0   $120.9   $106.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:

    

Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in Accounts Payable

  $6.4   $0.9   $4.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in other long-term liabilities (related to leasing obligations for new corporate headquarters facility)

  $17.4   $0.0   $0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Acquisitions in which liabilities were assumed are as follows:

    

Fair value of assets

  $69.1   $126.0   $0.0  

Purchase price

   (69.1  (126.0  0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities assumed

  $0.0   $0.0   $0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash Flow From Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

413.9

 

 

$

394.4

 

 

$

349.8

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

57.1

 

 

 

59.7

 

 

 

56.0

 

Amortization expense

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

30.8

 

 

 

29.0

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

13.2

 

Equity in net (earnings) losses of affiliates

 

 

(11.6

)

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(8.9

)

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

10.3

 

Non cash compensation expense

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

12.4

 

Asset impairment charge and other asset write-offs

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

2.1

 

Other

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

(1.1

)

Change in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(31.2

)

 

 

(9.0

)

Inventories

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

(7.3

)

 

 

(1.1

)

Other current assets

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

2.0

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

67.9

 

 

 

30.7

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

(23.8

)

 

 

58.7

 

Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised

 

 

(18.5

)

 

 

(13.1

)

 

 

(14.6

)

Other operating assets and liabilities, net

 

 

(5.8

)

 

 

(20.2

)

 

 

(5.9

)

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities

 

 

540.3

 

 

 

499.6

 

 

 

523.6

 

Cash Flow From Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

 

(70.5

)

 

 

(67.1

)

 

 

(74.5

)

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(215.7

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(652.3

)

Investment interest in joint venture

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(6.4

)

 

 

(13.7

)

Other

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

(0.8

)

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

 

 

(288.4

)

 

 

(77.1

)

 

 

(741.3

)

Cash Flow From Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt borrowings

 

 

299.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

399.6

 

Short-term debt borrowings (repayments)

 

 

(6.7

)

 

 

(99.4

)

 

 

251.3

 

Proceeds from stock options exercised

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

22.0

 

 

 

28.0

 

Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised

 

 

18.5

 

 

 

13.1

 

 

 

14.6

 

Payment of cash dividends

 

 

(167.5

)

 

 

(155.2

)

 

 

(134.5

)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

(478.8

)

 

 

(50.1

)

 

 

(250.4

)

Lease incentive proceeds

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

Lease principal payments

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

0.0

 

Deferred financing costs

 

 

(4.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(3.4

)

Other

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities

 

 

(306.6

)

 

 

(259.8

)

 

 

305.2

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(19.2

)

 

 

(8.8

)

 

 

4.1

 

Net Change In Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

(73.9

)

 

 

153.9

 

 

 

91.6

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

 

 

496.9

 

 

 

343.0

 

 

 

251.4

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 

$

423.0

 

 

$

496.9

 

 

$

343.0

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW-CONTINUED

(In millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest (net of amounts capitalized)

 

$

25.7

 

 

$

26.4

 

 

$

9.7

 

Income taxes

 

$

181.5

 

 

$

219.2

 

 

$

123.8

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in

   Accounts Payable

 

$

14.5

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

3.1

 

Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in other

   long-term liabilities (related to leasing obligations for new corporate

   headquarters facility)

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

32.5

 

Acquisitions in which liabilities were assumed were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of assets

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

825.7

 

Purchase price

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(652.3

)

Liabilities assumed

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

173.4

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012

(In millions)

 

  Number of Shares  Amounts 

(In millions)

 Common
Stock
  Treasury
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Treasury
Stock
  Total
Church &
Dwight  Co., Inc.
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 

December 31, 2008

  146.4    (6.2 $146.4   $178.9   $1,063.9   $(20.4 $(37.3 $1,331.5   $0.2   $1,331.7  

Net income

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    243.5    0.0    0.0    243.5    0.0    243.5  

Translation adjustments

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    34.1    0.0    34.1    0.0    34.1  

Derivative agreements, net of taxes of $0.8

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    1.1    0.0    1.1    0.0    1.1  

Defined benefit plans, net of taxes of $0.8

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (4.7  0.0    (4.7  0.0    (4.7

Cash dividends

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (32.3  0.0    0.0    (32.3  0.0    (32.3

Stock Purchases

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (0.4  (0.4  0.0    (0.4

Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $5.8

  0.0    0.9    0.0    23.1    0.0    0.0    4.6    27.7    0.0    27.7  

Other stock issuances

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.9    0.0    0.0    0.2    1.1    0.0    1.1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

  146.4    (5.3 $146.4   $202.9   $1,275.1   $10.1   $(32.9 $1,601.6   $0.2   $1,601.8  

Net income

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    270.7    0.0    0.0    270.7    0.0    270.7  

Translation adjustments

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (2.5  0.0    (2.5  0.0    (2.5

Derivative agreements, net of taxes of $2.3

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    3.4    0.0    3.4    0.0    3.4  

Defined benefit plans, net of taxes of $4.3

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    5.3    0.0    5.3    0.0    5.3  

Cash dividends

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (44.0   0.0    (44.0  0.0    (44.0

Stock purchases

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (0.1  (0.1  0.0    (0.1

Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $8.5

  0.0    1.2    0.0    27.6    0.0    0.0    8.0    35.6    0.0    35.6  

Other stock issuances

  0.0    0.1    0.0    0.3    0.0    0.0    0.4    0.7    0.0    0.7  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

  146.4    (4.0 $146.4   $230.8   $1,501.8   $16.3   $(24.6 $1,870.7   $0.2   $1,870.9  

Net income

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    309.6    0.0    0.0    309.6    0.0    309.6  

Translation adjustments

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (7.3  0.0    (7.3  0.0    (7.3

Derivative agreements, net of taxes of $(0.3)

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    1.2    0.0    1.2    0.0    1.2  

Defined benefit plans, net of taxes of $2.7

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (7.3  0.0    (7.3  0.0    (7.3

Cash dividends

  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (97.4  0.0    0.0    (97.4  0.0    (97.4

Stock purchases

  0.0    (1.8  0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    (80.2  (80.2  0.0    (80.2

Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $13.3

  0.0    1.6    0.0    40.3    0.0    0.0    9.9    50.2    0.0    50.2  

Other stock issuances

  0.0    0.1    0.0    0.6    0.0    0.0    0.5    1.1    0.0    1.1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  146.4    (4.1 $146.4   $271.7   $1,714.0   $2.9   $(94.4 $2,040.6   $0.2   $2,040.8  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Shares

 

 

Amounts

 

 

 

Common

Stock

 

 

Treasury

Stock

 

 

Common

Stock

 

 

Additional

Paid-In

Capital

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

 

 

Treasury

Stock

 

 

Total

Church &

Dwight Co., Inc.

Stockholders'

Equity

 

 

Noncontrolling

Interest

 

 

Total

Stockholders'

Equity

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

(4.1

)

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

271.7

 

 

$

1,714.0

 

 

$

2.9

 

 

$

(94.4

)

 

$

2,040.6

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

2,040.8

 

Net income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

349.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

349.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

349.8

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.4

)

Cash dividends

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(134.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(134.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(134.5

)

Stock purchases

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(5.0

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(250.4

)

 

 

(250.4

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(250.4

)

Stock based compensation expense and stock

   option plan transactions, including related

   income tax benefits of $15.4

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

45.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

54.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

54.4

 

Other stock issuances

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.4

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

(7.6

)

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

318.8

 

 

$

1,929.3

 

 

$

2.5

 

 

$

(336.1

)

 

$

2,060.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

2,061.1

 

Net income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

394.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

394.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

394.4

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.3

)

Cash dividends

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(155.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(155.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(155.2

)

Stock purchases

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(50.1

)

 

 

(50.1

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(50.1

)

Stock based compensation expense and stock

   option plan transactions, including related

   income tax benefits of $13.4

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

18.1

 

 

 

52.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

52.2

 

Other stock issuances

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

December 31, 2013

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

(7.5

)

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

352.9

 

 

$

2,168.5

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

(368.1

)

 

$

2,299.9

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

2,300.0

 

Net income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

413.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

413.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

413.9

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(34.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(34.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(34.9

)

Cash dividends

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(167.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(167.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(167.5

)

Stock purchases

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(6.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(478.8

)

 

 

(478.8

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(478.8

)

Stock based compensation expense and stock

   option plan transactions, including related

   income tax benefits of $18.8

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

11.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

56.3

 

 

 

67.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

67.6

 

Other stock issuances

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

1.6

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

(13.1

)

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

364.8

 

 

$

2,414.9

 

 

$

(34.7

)

 

$

(789.5

)

 

$

2,101.9

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

2,101.9

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

59


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Significant Accounting Policies(In millions, except share and per share data)

1.

Significant Accounting Policies

Business

The Company, founded in 1846, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of consumerhousehold, personal care and specialty products.  It recognizes revenues and profits from sellingThe Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brand names, including ARM & HAMMERbrands through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and TROJAN, to supermarkets, drugother specialty stores and mass merchandisers thatwebsites, all of which sell the products to consumers.  The Company also sells itsspecialty products to industrial customers and distributors.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. and include the accounts of the Company and its majority-ownedmajority‑owned subsidiaries.  The Company accounts forFor equity investments on the cost method for those investments in which itthe Company does not control noror have the ability to exert significant influence over the investee, which generally is when the Company has less than a 20 percent20% ownership interest.interest, the investments are accounted for under the cost method.  In circumstances where the Company has greater than a 20 percent20% ownership interest and has the ability to exercise significant influence over, but does not control, the investee, the investment is accounted for under the equity method.  As a result, the Company accounts for its 50 percent50% interest in its Armand Products Company (“Armand”) joint venture, 50 percent50% interest in The ArmaKleen Company (“ArmaKleen”) joint venture, and its one-third interest in its Natronx Technologies, LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture under the equity method of accounting.method.  Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx are specialty chemical businesses, and the Company’s equity earnings (losses) in them are reported in the Company’s corporate segment, as described in Note 18.17.  None of these entities are considered a significant subsidiary; therefore, summarized financial statement data is not presented.

On June 1, 2011, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s Common Stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend. All applicable amounts in the consolidated financial statements, including earnings per share and related disclosures, have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

presentedFiscal Calendar.

The Company’s fiscal year begins on January 1st and ends on December 31st. In 2011 and prior reporting periods, quarterly periods have been based on a 4 weeks—4 weeks—5 weeks methodology. As a result, the first quarter could include a partial or expanded week in the first four week period of the quarter. Similarly, the last five week period in the fourth quarter could include a partial or expanded week.

In 2012, in connection with its implementation of a new information system, the Company is changing its 4 week—4 week—5 week quarterly reporting calendar to a month-end quarterly calendar. This change will eliminate differences in the number of days in the first and fourth quarters of the year, when the Company provides year-over-prior year comparisons beginning in 2013. These differences will not have a material effect on the comparative results of the quarterly periods in 2011 and 2010.

In addition, as a result of the Company transitioning to the new information system in North America and Western Europe during 2011 and 2012, in the fourth quarter 2011 the Company eliminated the one month reporting lag for its U.K, France and Australia subsidiaries to be consistent with the fiscal calendar of the Company and its other subsidiaries. Due to the elimination of the reporting lag, 13 fiscal months of financial results are included in 2011 for the affected subsidiaries. The implementation of the new information system will enable the Company to timely consolidate these results. The elimination of this previously existing reporting lag is considered a change in accounting principle. The Company believes this change is preferable because it provides more current information to the users of the financial statements and eliminates the need to track and

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

reconcile material intervening transactions. The Company has determined that the impact of the extra month is not material to its financial statements and, therefore has not retrospectively adjusted prior year amounts. The elimination of the reporting lag also resulted in the inclusion of the extra month within the fourth quarter of 2011 for the affected subsidiaries, which increased 2011 fourth quarter annual net sales by $14.3 million, and had a negligible impact on net income. If the change had been made retrospectively, net sales in 2010 would have been $1.0 million lower and net sales in 2009 would have been $4.8 million higher; net income would have been $0.1 and $1.1 million higher, respectively.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent gains and losses at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Management makes estimates regarding inventory valuation, promotional and sales returns reserves, the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets, the realization of deferred tax assets, tax reserves, liabilities related to pensions and other postretirement benefit obligations and other matters that affect the reported amounts and other disclosures in the financial statements.  EstimatesThese estimates are based on judgment and available information.  Therefore, actualActual results could differ materially from those estimates, and it is possible that changes in such estimates could occur in the near term.

RRevenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when finished goods are delivered to ourthe Company’s customers or when finished goods are picked up by a customer or a customer’s carrier.

Promotional and Sales Returns Reserves

The Company conducts extensive promotional activities, primarily through the use of off-list discounts, slotting, co-opcoupons, cooperative advertising, periodic price reduction arrangements, and end-aisle and other in-store displays.  AllThe costs of such costsactivities are netted against sales.  Slotting costs are recorded when the product is delivered to the customer.  Costs associated with coupon redemption are recorded when coupons are circulated.  Cooperative advertising costs are recorded when the customer places the advertisement for the Company’s products.  Discounts relating to price reduction arrangements are recorded when the related sale takes place.  Costs associated with end-aisle or other in-store displays are recorded when the revenue from the product that is subject to the promotion is recognized.  The reserves for sales returns and consumer and trade promotion liabilities are established based on the Company’s best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing obligations for such items with respect to products sold as of the balance sheet date.  The Company uses historical trend experience and coupon redemption provider input in arriving at coupon reserve requirements, and uses forecasted appropriations, customer and sales organization inputs, and historical trend analysis in determining the reserves for other promotional activities and sales returns.

60


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Cost of Sales, Marketing and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Cost of sales include costs related to the manufacture of the Company’s products, including raw material, costs, inbound freight, costs, direct labor (including employee compensation benefits) and indirect plant costs such as plant supervision, receiving, inspection, maintenance labor and materials, depreciation, taxes and insurance, purchasing, production planning, operations management, logistics, freight to customers, warehousing costs, internal transfer freight costs and plant impairment charges.

Marketing expenses include costs for advertising (excluding the costs of cooperative advertising programs, which are reflected in net sales), costs for coupon insertion (mainly the cost of printing and distribution),

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

consumer promotion costs (such as on-shelf advertisements and floor ads), public relations, package design expense and market research costs.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses include, among others, costs related to functions such as sales, corporate management, research and development, marketing administration, information technology and legal, among others.legal.  Such costs include salary compensation related costs (such as benefits, profit sharing, deferredincentive compensation and employer contributions to employee savings plans);profit sharing), stock option costs, depreciation, travel and entertainment related expenses; trade show expenses; insurance;expenses, professional and other consulting fees; costs related to temporary staff; staff relocation costs;fees and non-capitalizable software related costs.amortization of intangible assets.

Foreign Currency Translation

Unrealized gains and losses related to currency translation are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).  Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid short-term investments and term bank deposits, which mature within three months of their original maturity date.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market.  Approximately 24%20% and 22%17% of the inventory at December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively, including substantially all inventory in the Company’s Specialty Products Division (“SPD”)  segment as well as domestic inventory sold primarily under the ARM & HAMMER trademark in the Consumer Domestic segment, werewas determined utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO)(“LIFO”) method.  The cost of the remaining inventory iswas determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method.  The Company identifies any slow moving, obsolete or excess inventory to determine whether an adjustment is required to establish a new carrying value.  The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates and assumptions about the future demand for the Company’s products, technological changes, and new product introductions.  The estimatesEstimates as to the future demand used in the valuation of inventory involve judgments regarding the ongoing success of the Company’s products.  The Company evaluates its inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis and records adjustments as required.  Adjustments to reflect inventory at net realizable value were $4.7 million$ 8.3 at December 31, 2011,2014, and $6.1 million$10.1 at December 31, 2010.2013.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plantPlant and equipmentEquipment (“PP&E”) are stated at cost.  Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.  Estimated useful lives for building and improvements, machinery and equipment, and office equipment range from 9-40, 3-20 and 3-10 years, respectively.  Routine repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred.  Leasehold improvements are depreciated over a period no longer than the respective lease term, except when thewhere a lease renewal has been determined to be reasonably assured and failure to renew the lease results in an economica significant penalty to the Company.

Property, plant and equipmentPP&E are reviewed annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that possible impairment exists.  The Company’s impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level at which cash flows of the long-lived assets are largely independent of other groups of Company assets and liabilities.  The analysis requires management judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines, and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates.  The Company conducts annual reviews to identify idle and underutilized equipment, and reviews business plans for possible

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

impairment.  Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows.  When an

61


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

impairment is indicated, the estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows.

Software

The Company capitalizes certain costs of developing computer software.  Amortization is recorded using the straight-linestraight‑line method over the estimated useful liveslife of the software, none of which areis estimated to be no longer than 10 years.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Certain financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value.  The estimated fair values of such financial instruments (including investment securities and other derivatives) have been determined using market information and valuation methodologies.  Changes in assumptions or estimation methods could affect the fair value estimates.  Other financial instruments, including cash equivalents and short-term debt, are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.  Additional information regarding ourthe Company’s risk management activities, including derivative instruments and hedging activities, are separately disclosed.  See Notes 2 and 3.  

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

GoodwillCarrying values of goodwill, trade names and other indefinite lived intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are reviewed periodically for possible impairment. The Company’s impairment at least annually.analysis is based on a discounted cash flow approach that requires significant judgment with respect to unit volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate.  Management uses estimates based on expected trends in making these assumptions.  With respect to goodwill, impairment occurs when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the discounted present value of cash flows for that reporting unit.  For trade names and other intangible assets, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows, which represents the estimated fair value of the asset.  Judgment is required in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual valuations.  Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological change, distribution losses, or competitive activities and acts by governments and courts may indicate that an asset has become impaired.   Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3-20 years, using the straight-line method, and reviewed for impairment. Seeimpairment when changes in market circumstances occur.  

It is possible that theProperty, Plant Company’s conclusions regarding impairment or recoverability of goodwill or other intangible assets could change in future periods if, for example, (i) the businesses or brands do not perform as projected, (ii) overall economic conditions in 2015 or future years vary from current assumptions (including changes in discount rates), (iii) business conditions or strategies change from current assumptions, (iv) investors require higher rates of return on equity investments in the marketplace or (v) enterprise values of comparable publicly traded companies, or actual sales transactions of comparable companies, were to decline, resulting in lower multiples of revenues and Equipment sectionEBITDA.  A future impairment charge for goodwill or intangible assets could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of this Note 1, above.operations.  

Research and Development

The Company incurred research and development expenses in the amount of $55.1 million, $53.7 million$59.8, $61.8 and $55.1 million$54.8 in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.  These expenses are included in selling, generalSG&A expenses and administrative expenses.are expensed as incurred.

62


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is calculated based on income available to holders of the Company’s common shareholdersstock (“Common Stock”) and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reported period.  Diluted EPS includes additional dilution from potential common stockCommon Stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options outstanding.options.  The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the weighted averageweighted-average number of common shares of Common Stock outstanding to the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis:

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010(1)   2009(1) 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

   143.2     142.0     140.8  

Dilutive effect of stock options

   2.6     2.4     2.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

   145.8     144.4     143.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Antidilutive stock options outstanding

   0.7     1.2     2.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

 

 

135.1

 

 

 

138.6

 

 

 

140.1

 

Dilutive effect of stock options

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

2.6

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

137.5

 

 

 

141.2

 

 

 

142.7

 

Antidilutive stock options outstanding

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

1.6

 

(1)Reflects two-for-one stock split

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Employee and Director Stock Option Based Compensation

The fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and the related expense is recognized over the required employee service period in which the share-based compensation vests.  In 2011,2014, the Company recorded a pre-tax chargeexpense of $11.0 million$17.0 associated with the fair-value of unvested stock options and restricted stock awards, of which $9.8 million$15.4 was included in selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses and $1.2 million$1.6 was included in cost of goods sold.sales.  In 2013, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $17.0 associated with the fair-value of unvested stock options and restricted stock awards, of which $15.5 was included in SG&A expenses and $1.5 was included in cost of sales.  In 2012, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $12.4 associated with the fair-value of unvested stock options and restricted stock awards, of which $11.0 was included in SG&A expenses and $1.4 was included in cost of sales.  

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, changes in the fair value of certain derivative financial instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges, and defined benefit plan adjustments, and is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and addressed in Note 15.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Management provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for amounts which are not considered “more likely than not” to be realized.  The Company records liabilities for potential assessments in various tax jurisdictions in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP).  The liabilities relate to tax return positions that, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by the tax authorities and do not meet the minimum recognition threshold required under applicable accounting guidance for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement.  The Company adjusts this liability as a result of changes in tax legislation, interpretations of laws by courts, rulings by tax authorities, changes in estimates and the expiration of the statute of limitations.  Many of the judgments involved in adjusting the liability involve assumptions and estimates that are highly uncertain and subject to change.  In this regard, settlement of any issue with, or an adverse determination in litigation withagainst, a taxing authority could require the use of cash and result in an increase in ourthe Company’s annual tax rate.  Conversely, favorable resolution of an issue with a taxing authority would be recognized as a reduction to ourthe Company’s annual tax rate.

New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new guidance that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue.  The new guidance provides that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to receive for those goods or services.  The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and allows companies to apply the requirements retrospectively, either to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment in the year of adoption.  Early adoption is not allowed.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

There have been no other accounting pronouncements issued but not yet adopted by the Company which are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Accounting pronouncements that became effective during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 did not require the Company to include additional financial statement disclosures and had no impact on the Company’sconsolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2. Fair Value Measurements

63


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

2.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Hierarchy

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value (generally, assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability) used to measure fair value based on the quality and reliability of the information provided by the inputs, as follows:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market basedmarket-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Fair Values of Other Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s assetsother financial instruments at December 31, 2014 and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were derivative instruments and are disclosed under Note 3.December 31, 2013:

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Input

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Level

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

Level 2

 

$

298.0

 

 

$

298.0

 

 

$

318.5

 

 

$

318.5

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

Level 2

 

 

146.7

 

 

 

146.7

 

 

 

153.8

 

 

 

153.8

 

2.875% Senior notes

 

Level 2

 

 

399.7

 

 

 

393.3

 

 

 

399.7

 

 

 

369.8

 

3.35% Senior notes

 

Level 2

 

 

249.9

 

 

 

255.6

 

 

 

249.8

 

 

 

258.2

 

2.45% Senior notes

 

Level 2

 

 

299.8

 

 

 

298.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt

   instrument

 

Level 2

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 The Company recognizes transfers between input levels as of the actual date of the event.  There were no transfers between input levels induring the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.

Fair Values of Other Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.2014.

 

   December 31, 2011   December 31, 2010 

(In millions)

  Carrying
Amount
   Fair
Value
   Carrying
Amount
   Fair
Value
 

Financial Assets:

        

Current portion of note receivable

  $0.6    $0.7    $1.6    $1.6  

Long-term note receivable

   0.1     0.1    ��0.8     0.8  

Financial Liabilities:

        

Short-term borrowings

   2.6     2.6     90.0     90.0  

3.35% Senior notes

   249.7     260.2     249.7     250.2  

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

Cash Equivalents:Note Receivable: Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid short-term investments and term bank deposits, which mature within three months.  The estimated fair value of the note receivable reflects what management believes is the appropriate interest factor at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, based on similar risks in the market.Company’s cash equivalents approximates their carrying value.

Short-Term Borrowings: Short-term Borrowings:The carrying amounts of the Company’s unsecured lines of credit and accounts receivable securitization equalcommercial paper issuances approximates fair value because of their short maturities and variable interest rates.

Senior Notes:The Company determines the fair value of its senior notes based uponon their quoted market value.value or broker quotes, when possible.  In the absence of observable market quotes, the notes are valued using non-binding market consensus prices that the Company seeks to corroborate with observable market data.

Hedged Fixed Rated Debt:3. Derivative Instruments The interest rate swap agreements convert the fixed interest rate to a variable rate based on LIBOR. These agreements are designated as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and Risk Managementare accounted for as fair value hedges.  The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet within Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation.  

Other:  The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximated estimated fair values as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.  

64


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

3.

Derivative Instruments and Risk Management

Changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the price of the Company’s Common Stock and commodity prices expose the Company to market risk.  The Company manages these risks by the use of derivative instruments, such as cash flow and fair value hedges, diesel hedge contracts, equity derivatives and foreign exchange forward contracts.  The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

When it enters into derivative arrangements, theThe Company formally designates and documents qualifying instruments as hedges of underlying exposures.exposures when it enters into derivative arrangements.  Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges and qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings during the period in which the hedged exposure affects earnings.  The Company reviews the effectiveness of its hedging instruments on a quarterly basis.  If the Company determines that a derivative instrument is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows, it recognizes the hedge ineffectiveness in current period earnings the hedge ineffectiveness and discontinues hedge accounting with respect to the derivative instrument.  Changes in the fair value forof derivatives not designated as hedges or those not qualifying for hedge accounting are recognized in current period earnings.  Upon termination of cash flow hedges, the Company reclassifies gains and losses from other comprehensive income based on the timing of the underlying cash flows, unless the termination results from the failure of the intended transaction to occur in the expected timeframe.  Such untimely transactions require immediate recognition in earnings of gains and losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During 2011,2014 and 2013, the Company used derivative instruments to mitigate risk, some of which were designated as hedging instruments.  The tables following the discussion of the derivative instruments below summarize the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and the effect of derivative instruments on the Company’s consolidated statements of income and on other comprehensive income.

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

Diesel Fuel Hedges

The Company uses independent freight carriers to deliver its products.  These carriers currently charge the Company a basic rate per mile that is subject to a mileage surcharge for diesel fuel price increases.  During 2011,2013 and 2014, the Company entered into hedge agreements with financial counterparties.counterparties to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices, and not to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel.  Under the hedge agreements, the Company agreed to pay a fixed price per gallon of diesel fuel determined at the time the agreements were executed and to receive a floating rate payment reflecting the variable common carriers’ mileage surcharge. The floating rate paymentthat is determined on a monthly basis based on the average price of the Department of Energy’s Diesel Fuel Index price during the applicable month and is designed to offset any increase or decrease in fuel surcharge paymentscosts that the Company pays to it common carriers.  The agreements cover approximately 35%57% of the Company’s 2014 diesel fuel requirements and are expected to cover approximately 63% and 16% of the Company’s estimated diesel fuel requirements for 20112015 and 33% of the Company’s total 20122016, respectively.  These diesel fuel requirements. The Company uses the hedge agreements to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges, and not to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel. The hedge agreements are designed to add stability to the Company’s product costs, enabling the Company to make pricing decisions and lessen the economic impact of abrupt changes in diesel fuel prices over the term of the contract.

Since the agreements qualify for hedge accounting,accounting.  Therefore, changes in the fair value of cash flow hedgesuch agreements are recorded inunder Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified to earnings whenon the hedged transactions affect earnings.balance sheet.

Foreign Currency

The Company is subject to exposure from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily U.S. Dollar/Euro, U.S. Dollar/British Pound, U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Mexican Peso, U.S. Dollar/Australian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Brazilian Real and U.S. Dollar/Chinese Yuan.

The Company, from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in the U.S. Dollar, Canadian dollar,Dollar, British poundPound and Euro.  Certain of the Company’s subsidiariesThe Company has entered into forward exchange contracts to protect the Companyitself from the risk that, due to changesfluctuations in currency exchange rates, it would be adversely affected by net cash outflows.  The face value of the unexpired contracts as of December 31, 20112014 totaled $53.3 in U.S. $30.3 million.Dollars.  The contracts qualifiedqualify as foreign currency cash flow hedges and, therefore, changes in the fair value of the contracts wereare recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affected earnings.

Interest Rate Swaps

On December 9, 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on the $300 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% senior notes, due December 15, 2019, to a variable rate based on LIBOR.  These interest rate

65


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

swap agreements have been designated as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and are accounted as fair value hedges.   

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Equity Derivatives

The Company has entered into equity derivative contracts covering its own stockthe Common Stock in order to minimize its liability resulting from changes in quoted fair values of Company stock, to participants inunder its Executive Deferred Compensation Plan resulting from changes in the quoted fair values of the Common Stock to participants who have investments under that planthe Plan in a notional Company stockCommon Stock fund.  The contracts are settled in cash.  Since the equity derivatives contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, the Company is required to mark such contracts to market throughout the contract term and record changes in fair value in the consolidated statement of income.

66


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

The following tables summarize the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and the effect of such derivative instruments on ourthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and on other comprehensive incomeOther Comprehensive Income (“OCI”):

 

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    Notional Amount    Fair Value at December 31,   

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

(In millions)

 

Balance Sheet Location

 December 31,
2011
  2011  2010 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

    

Asset Derivatives

    

Diesel fuel contracts

 Other current assets $3.9   $0.1   $0.6  

Foreign exchange contracts

 Accounts receivable $30.3    1.1    0.0  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   $1.2   $0.6  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liability Derivatives

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Accounts payable and accrued expenses $0.0   $0.0   $1.0  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   $0.0   $1.0  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

    

Asset Derivatives

    

Equity derivatives

 Other current assets $17.2   $2.0    0.4  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   $2.0   $0.4  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liability Derivatives

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Accounts payable and accrued expenses $0.0   $0.0   $0.1  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   $0.0   $0.1  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  

Income Statement Location

 Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
from Derivatives

for the Year ended December 31,
 
  2011  2010  2009 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

    

Foreign exchange contracts (net of taxes)

 Other comprehensive income (loss) $1.5   $(0.1 $(0.6

Diesel fuel contracts (net of taxes)

 Other comprehensive income (loss)  (0.3  0.4    0.0  

Interest rate collars and swaps (net of taxes)

 Other comprehensive income (loss)  0.0    3.1    1.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total gain (loss) recognized in OCI

  $1.2   $3.4   $1.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
for the Year ended December 31,
 
        2011      2010  2009 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

    

Equity derivatives

 Selling, general and administrative expenses $3.9   $1.4   $0.9  

Foreign exchange contracts

 Selling, general and administrative expenses  (0.1  (0.2  0.0  

Diesel fuel contracts

 Cost of sales  0.0    (0.5  0.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total gain (loss) recognized in income

  $3.8   $0.7   $1.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

 

 

Notional Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Fair Value at December 31,

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

2014

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Derivatives designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other current assets

 

$

53.3

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

0.5

 

Diesel fuel contracts

 

Other current assets

 

Not Applicable

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

0.8

 

Liability Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diesel fuel contracts

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

5.4 gallons

 

 

$

4.4

 

 

$

0.0

 

Interest rate swap

 

Deferred and other long-term liabilities

 

$

300.0

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5.3

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity derivatives

 

Other current assets

 

$

27.5

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

2.4

 

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

2.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI

 

 

 

 

 

from Derivatives

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Location

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Derivatives designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diesel fuel contracts (net of taxes)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(3.0

)

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

Foreign exchange contracts (net of

   taxes)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.8

 

Total gain (loss) recognized in

   OCI

 

 

 

$

(1.1

)

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Income Statement Location

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity derivatives

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

$

4.7

 

 

$

5.3

 

 

$

3.1

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(1.5

)

Total gain (loss) recognized in

   income

 

 

 

$

4.7

 

 

$

5.2

 

 

$

1.6

 

 

Other than the reclassification of losses related to the termination of interest rate swap and interest rate collar agreements in the fourth quarter of 2010, there were no other material reclassifications of gains (losses) from other comprehensive income to earnings for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The notional amount of a financialderivative instrument is the nominal or face amount that is used to calculate payments made on that instrument.  The fair values of the derivative instruments disclosed above were measured based on Level 2 inputs.inputs (observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data).

The fair value of the foreign exchange contracts is based on observable forward rates in commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the contract.

The fair value of the equity derivatives is based on the quoted market prices of Company stock at the end of each reporting period.

The fair value of the diesel fuel contracts is based on home heating oil futures prices for the duration of the contract.67


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

4. InventoriesNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

4.

Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

(In millions)

  December 31,
2011
   December 31,
2010
 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Raw materials and supplies

  $49.6    $52.5  

 

$

70.8

 

 

$

70.2

 

Work in process

   11.3     12.1  

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

30.4

 

Finished goods

   139.8     130.8  

 

 

150.1

 

 

 

149.9

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $200.7    $195.4  

 

$

245.9

 

 

$

250.5

 

  

 

   

 

 

Inventories valued onusing the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”)LIFO method totaled $48.3 million$49.3 and $42.9 million$42.3 at December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively, and would have been approximately $6.4 million$4.3 and $4.5 million$4.8 higher, respectively, had they been valued using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”)FIFO method.  The amount of LIFO liquidations in 20112014 and 20102013 were immaterial.

In 2011, the Company reclassified approximately $2.9 million of inventory at its Brazil facility to assets held for sale. See Note 8 for further information.

5. Property, Plant and Equipment

5.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (“PP&E”)

PP&E consist of the following:

 

(In millions)

  December 31,
2011
   December 31,
2010
 

Land

  $25.6    $26.0  

Buildings and improvements

   224.5     229.0  

Machinery and equipment

   479.4     481.9  

Office equipment and other assets

   31.3     31.0  

Software

   91.4     54.2  

Mineral rights

   0.7     1.6  

Construction in progress

   57.6     39.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross Property, Plant and Equipment

   910.5     863.2  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   404.5     394.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Property, Plant and Equipment

  $506.0    $468.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Land

 

$

25.5

 

 

$

25.7

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

281.7

 

 

 

280.4

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

599.3

 

 

 

577.5

 

Software

 

 

86.4

 

 

 

83.0

 

Office equipment and other assets

 

 

57.2

 

 

 

57.7

 

Construction in progress

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

42.9

 

Gross Property, Plant and Equipment

 

 

1,121.6

 

 

 

1,067.2

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

505.4

 

 

 

473.1

 

Net Property, Plant and Equipment

 

$

616.2

 

 

$

594.1

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Depreciation and amortization on PP&E

 

$

57.1

 

 

$

59.7

 

 

$

56.0

 

Interest charges capitalized (in construction in progress)

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.8

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 

(In millions)

      2011           2010           2009     

Depreciation and amortization on PP&E

  $49.8    $44.1    $56.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest charges capitalized (in construction in progress)

  $1.9    $1.0    $2.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In 2011, the Company reclassified approximately $8.6 million of net property, plant and equipment at its Brazil facility to assets held for sale. The Company plans to sell its sodium bicarbonate business at this location, including related property, plant and equipment and working capital. See Note 8 for further information.

Software increased in 2011 due to expenditures for the Company’s new information system.

Construction in progress at December 31, 2011 includes $17.4 million related to the Company’s capital lease for its new Corporate headquarters facility as the Company is considered the owner, for financial statement reporting purposes, during the construction phase.

The Company recorded approximately $2.3 million of accelerated depreciation expense in cost of sales for the year ended 2011 in connection with the reorganization of its Green River, Wyoming facility. Additionally, the Company closed its North Brunswick, New Jersey facility in the fourth quarter of 2009 and recorded accelerated depreciation charges in the Consumer Domestic Segment on those facilities following the announcement of the closing in June 2008. The accelerated depreciation charges of $16.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 are included in cost of sale. See Note 9 for further information.

In 2011, capitalized interest charges were higher than in 2010 due to the Company’s new information system project.

The Company recognized charges related to equipment obsolescence, which occur in the ordinary course of business, and plant impairment charges during the three year period ended December 31, 20112014 as follows:

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

      2011           2010           2009     

Segments:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Domestic

  $1.9    $0.6    $3.2  

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

1.6

 

Consumer International

   0.2     0.0     0.0  

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.4

 

Specialty Products

   1.0     3.1     6.9  

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $3.1    $3.7    $10.1  

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

2.1

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The 2011impairment charges in 2014 and 2013, and the Consumer Domestic charge is a result of theand SPD impairment charges in 2012 are due to idling of equipment. The Specialty Products2012 Consumer International charge in 2011 is associated withdue to the Company’s decision to explore strategic options for the chemical business in Brazil. In 2010,cancelation of a software project.  

6.

Acquisitions

On September 19, 2014, the Company recorded a plant asset impairment chargeacquired certain feminine care brands, including REPHRESH and REPLENS, from Lil’ Drug Store Products, Inc., (“Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”) for cash consideration of approximately $3.1 million, representing the carrying value of certain assets, associated with its Brazil subsidiary. The charge is a result of a reduction in forecasted sales volume which has negatively impacted projected profitability. The charge is included in cost of sales in the Specialty Products Division segment income statement. In 2009, the Company recorded a plant asset impairment charge of approximately $6.9 million, representing the carrying value of certain assets, associated with one of its international subsidiaries.$215.7.  The Company measuredpaid for the impairment charge using the discounted cash flow method. This subsidiary manufactures some products that compete with imports priced in U.S. dollars. As the dollar has weakened, it has been necessary to lower prices in the local currency to stay competitive, leading to negative cash flows, which is the key input under the discounted cash

68


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

flow method.acquisition with additional debt.  The charge is included in costannual sales of sales in the Specialty Products Division segment income statement. The $3.2 million charge recorded in the Consumer Domestic Segment in 2009 is primarily a result of a lack of acceptance for certain products by our key customers that resulted in a decline of forecasted future cash flows and reduced profitability. The Company’s fair value measurement input is considered a Level 3 input.

In 2010, the Company sold $5.5 million of property, plant and equipment associated with the BRILLO product line.

6. Acquisition of Assets

On November 8, 2011, the Company acquired a license for certain oralbrands are approximately $46.0.  These feminine care technology for cash consideration of $4.3 million. The Company paid for the acquisition from available cash. The technology will bebrands are managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.

On June 28, 2011, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo brand from Vivalis, Limited for cash consideration of $64.8 million. The Company paid for the acquisition from available cash. BATISTE annual sales are approximately $20.0 million. The BATISTE brand is managed principally within theand Consumer International segment.

On December 21, 2010, the Company acquired the FELINE PINE cat litter brand from Nature’s Earth Products, Inc. for cash consideration of $46.0 million. FELINE PINE annual net sales are approximately $20.0 million. The acquired brand will complement the existing ARM & HAMMER cat litter business. The FELINE PINE brand is managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.

On September 2, 2010, the Company acquired certain oral care technology (“Technology Acquisition”) for cash consideration of $10.0 million. The new oral care technology is managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.

On June 4, 2010, the Company acquired the SIMPLY SALINE brand from Blairex Laboratories for cash consideration of $70.0 million. SIMPLY SALINE annual net sales are approximately $20.0 million. The SIMPLY SALINE brand is managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.segments.  

The fair values of the net assets acquired in 2011 and in 2010 are set forth as follows:

 

   2011

(In millions)

  Batiste  Oral Care
Technology
  Total

Inventory

   $1.0    $0.0    $1.0 

Tradenames and other intangibles

    53.1     4.3     57.4 

Goodwill

    10.7     0.0     10.7 
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

    64.8     4.3     69.1 

Liabilities

    0.0     0.0     0.0 
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Purchase Price

   $64.8    $4.3    $69.1 
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

Lil’ Drug Store

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory and other working capital

 

$

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

Trade Names and other intangibles

 

 

109.0

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

102.8

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase Price

 

$

215.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

   2010 

(In millions)

  Simply Saline   Oral Care
Technology
   Feline Pine   Total 

Inventory / Current Assets

  $1.7    $0.0    $1.4    $3.1  

Tradenames and other intangibles

   55.6     10.0     38.5     104.1  

Goodwill

   12.7     0.0     6.1     18.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

   70.0     10.0     46.0     126.0  

Liabilities

   0.0     0.0     0.0     0.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Purchase Price

  $70.0    $10.0    $46.0    $126.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted average life of the amortizable intangible assets recognized from the 2011Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition ranges from 5 - 20 years.  The goodwill is a result of expected synergies from combined operations of the acquisition and 2010 acquisitions was 15 years for the acquisitions other than the two oral care technology acquisitions and from 7-10 years for the oral care technology acquisitions.Company.  Pro forma results reflecting these acquisitions are not presented because theythe impact is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results.

On October 1, 2012, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Avid Health, Inc. (“Avid Health”) for $652.8.  The Company financed the acquisition with a combination of proceeds from an underwritten public offering of $400 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022, the issuance of commercial paper and cash.  Products acquired in the acquisition include L’IL CRITTERS children’s gummy form dietary supplements and VITAFUSION adult gummy form dietary supplements.  These dietary supplement brands are managed principally within the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments.

The final fair values of the net assets acquired in 2012 for Avid Health, including the 2013 adjustments to fair value are below.  The 2013 measurement period adjustments were not retrospectively adjusted as of December 31, 2012 as the amounts were not material.

 

 

2012

 

 

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

Date Final

 

Avid Health

 

Fair Value

 

Inventory

 

$

38.8

 

Accounts receivables, net

 

 

29.3

 

Other current assets

 

 

1.9

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

31.6

 

Long-term assets

 

 

1.4

 

Trade Names and other intangibles

 

 

362.2

 

Goodwill

 

 

353.8

 

Total Assets

 

$

819.0

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(19.5

)

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(146.7

)

Purchase Price

 

$

652.8

 

7. Goodwill

Unaudited pro forma results for 2012 reflecting the Avid Health acquisition are presented below.

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

Unaudited consolidated pro forma results

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Reported

 

 

Pro forma

 

Net Sales

 

$

2,921.9

 

 

$

3,106.0

 

Net Income

 

$

349.8

 

 

$

374.9

 

Net Income per share - Basic

 

$

2.50

 

 

$

2.68

 

Net Income per share - Diluted

 

$

2.45

 

 

$

2.63

 

69


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and Other Intangiblesper share data)

These pro forma results give effect to the Avid Health acquisition as if it occurred on January 1, 2011.  2012 pro forma net income was adjusted to exclude the pre-tax equivalent of $4.4 of acquisition-related costs and $7.6 of nonrecurring expense related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition-date inventory.  

7.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles, Net

The following table provides information related to the carrying value of all intangible assets, other than goodwill:

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 December 31, 2011   December 31, 2010 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Amortization
Period
(Years)
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

(Years)

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tradenames

 $116.9   $(61.3 $55.6    3-20   $117.1   $(53.9 $63.2  

Trade Names

 

$

255.3

 

 

$

(85.2

)

 

$

170.1

 

 

3-20

 

$

166.8

 

 

$

(73.9

)

 

$

92.9

 

Customer Relationships

  253.8    (64.3  189.5    15-20    250.5    (50.5  200.0  

 

 

347.3

 

 

 

(119.9

)

 

 

227.4

 

 

15-20

 

 

333.0

 

 

 

(100.4

)

 

 

232.6

 

Patents/Formulas

  43.0    (24.8  18.2    4-20    38.5    (21.0  17.5  

 

 

48.6

 

 

 

(38.3

)

 

 

10.3

 

 

4-20

 

 

43.5

 

 

 

(31.4

)

 

 

12.1

 

Non Compete Agreement

  1.4    (1.2  0.2    5-10    1.4    (1.0  0.4  

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

5-10

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 $415.1   $(151.6 $263.5    $407.5   $(126.4 $281.1  

 

$

652.6

 

 

$

(244.8

)

 

$

407.8

 

 

 

 

$

544.7

 

 

$

(207.0

)

 

$

337.7

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Indefinite lived intangible assets—Carrying value

       
  December 31,
2011
        December 31,
2010
     

Tradenames

 $640.6      $591.4    
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

Indefinite lived intangible assets - Carrying value

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

Trade Names

 

 

 

 

 

$

864.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

866.6

 

The Company recognized intangible asset impairment charges within SG&A expenses during the three year period ended December 31, 2014 as follows:

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Segments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Domestic

 

$

5.0

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

0.0

 

Consumer International

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

Total

 

$

5.0

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

$

0.0

 

During 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 for an intangible asset related to the Consumer Domestic segment.  This charge is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in this segment and was the result of reduced sales and profitability related to the product line.  The amount of the charge was determined from estimating that future cash flows would not be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the asset.  

The trade name impairment charges recorded in 2013 were a result of lower forecasted sales and profitability and increased competition.  The amount of the impairment charge was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.  Fair value was estimated based on a “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” discounted cash flow method, which contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change, and therefore could impact fair values in the future.  Consequently, the Company determined that a Consumer Domestic and a Consumer International trade name should be re-characterized from indefinite lived to finite lived assets.  The carrying value of these trade names was approximately $35.7 as of December 31, 2013 and is being amortized over 15 years.  

The Company determined that the carrying value of all trade names as of December 31, 2014, was recoverable based upon the forecasted cash flows and profitability of the brands.  In 2014, the results of the Company’s annual impairment test for indefinite lived trade names resulted in a personal care trade name whose fair value exceeded its carrying value by 11%.  This trade name is valued at approximately $37.0 and is considered an important asset to the Company.  The Company continues to monitor performance and should there be any significant change in forecasted assumptions or estimates, including sales, profitability and discount rate, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment charge.  

70


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Intangible amortization expense amounted to $25.2 million$31.7 for 2011, $23.7 million2014, $28.9 for 20102013 and $24.2 million in 2009.$26.8 for 2012, respectively.  The Company estimates that intangible amortization expense will be approximately $24 million$35.8 in 20122015 and approximately $22 million$34.5 in each of the next fourfive years.

Other intangible assets increased in 2011 due to the acquisitions noted in Note 6. The acquired intangible assets reflect their allocable purchase price as of their respective purchase dates.

There were no tradename impairment charges during the three year period ended December 31, 2011.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the yearyears ended December 31, 20112014 and 2013 are as follows:

 

(In millions)

  Consumer
Domestic
   Consumer
International
   Specialty
Products
   Total 

Balance December 31, 2009

  $781.4    $36.5    $20.2    $838.1  

SIMPLY SALINE acquired goodwill

   12.7     0.0     0.0     12.7  

FELINE PINE acquired goodwill

   6.1     0.0     0.0     6.1  

Additional contingent consideration

   0.5     0.0     0.0     0.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2010

  $800.7    $36.5    $20.2    $857.4  

BATISTE acquired goodwill

   0.0     10.7     0.0     10.7  

Additional contingent consideration

   0.3     0.0     0.0     0.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2011

  $801.0    $47.2    $20.2    $868.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Specialty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

International

 

 

Products

 

 

Total

 

Balance December 31, 2012

 

$

1,146.4

 

 

$

47.2

 

 

$

20.2

 

 

$

1,213.8

 

Avid Health purchase price allocation adjustment

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

8.4

 

Balance December 31, 2013

 

$

1,154.8

 

 

$

47.2

 

 

$

20.2

 

 

$

1,222.2

 

Lil' Drug Store Brands acquired goodwill

 

 

87.4

 

 

 

15.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

102.8

 

Balance December 31, 2014

 

$

1,242.2

 

 

$

62.6

 

 

$

20.2

 

 

$

1,325.0

 

The 2014 increase in goodwill and amortizable assets is due to the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition, which is deductible for U.S. tax purposes.

The Company performed itsresult of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test, as ofperformed in the beginning of the second quarter of 2011,2014, determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeded the carrying values of all reporting units. The determination of fair value contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change and no adjustments were required.

8. Assets Held for Sale and Sale of Assets

The Company is exploring strategic options for its chemical business in Brazil. The business, which has annual revenues of approximately $40 million, markets sodium bicarbonate, dairy products and other chemicals in Brazil. The net assets associated with a portion of this business has been classified as “held for sale” for financial statement reporting purposes as of December 31, 2011. The Company reclassified approximately $8.6 million of net property, plant and equipment and approximately $3.1 million of inventories and supply parts at its Brazil facility to assets held for sale.

In the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold the BRILLO and certain LAMBERT KAY product lines, along with associated productive assets, that were classified as net assets held for sale at December 31, 2009. The aggregate carryingtherefore could impact fair value of these assets at December 31, 2009 was approximately $8.8 million. In 2010, the Company received net proceeds from the sale of these assets of $8.2 million, along with a note receivable of $1.8 million, and, in the first quarter of 2010, recognized a gain of approximately $1.0 million that was recorded as an offset to selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consumer Domestic segment.

9. Restructuring Activities

International Facility Closing Costs

During 2010, the Company decided to cease operations at two plants operated by one of its international subsidiaries. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred and recognized $0.9 million in exit and disposal costs. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had incurred and paid a cumulative total of $1.4 million relating to exit and disposal costs. These charges were included in cost of sales in the Specialty Products segment. All other costs associated with the international plant shut down activity will be recorded in the period in which the liability is incurred (generally, when goods or services associated with the activity are received).

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

North Brunswick, New Jersey Closing Costs

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company completed construction and started operations in its integrated laundry detergent manufacturing plant and distribution center in York, Pennsylvania. In conjunction with the opening of the new facility, the Company closed its existing laundry detergent manufacturing plant and distribution facility in North Brunswick, New Jersey.

The following table summarizes the liabilities and cash costs paid or settled in connection with the closing of the North Brunswick facility, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, which have been included in for the results of the Consumer Domestic segments:

(In millions)

  Severance
Liability
  Contract
Termination
Costs
  Other Exit and
Disposal Costs
  Total 

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $2.7   $5.7   $0.9   $9.3  

Costs incurred and charged to expenses

   0.0    2.9    0.0    2.9  

Adjustments related to the North Brunswick Lease

   0.0    2.1    0.7    2.8  

Costs paid or settled

   (2.7  (6.0  (1.2  (9.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liability Balance at December 31, 2010

  $0.0   $4.7   $0.4   $5.1  

Costs incurred and charged to expenses

   0.0    0.2    0.0    0.2  

Adjustments related to the North Brunswick Lease

   0.0    1.3    0.7    2.0  

Costs paid or settled

   0.0    (1.7  (0.2  (1.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liability Balance at December 31, 2011

  $0.0   $4.5   $0.9   $5.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date

  $3.0   $13.0   $3.2   $19.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company does not anticipate any additional material expenditures in connection with the closing of the North Brunswick facility.

Green River, Wyoming

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company announced its decision to relocate a portion of its Green River, Wyoming operations to a newly leased site in Victorville, California in the first half of 2012. Specifically, the Company will be relocating its cat litter manufacturing operations and distribution center to this southern California site to be closer to transportation hubs and its West Coast customers. The site will also produce liquid laundry detergent products and is expandable to meet future business needs. The Company’s sodium bicarbonate operations and other consumer product manufacturing will remain at the Green River facility.

The Company invested approximately $11 million in 2011 and in total expects to invest approximately $35 million in capital expenditures and incur approximately $7 million in transition expenses in connection with the opening of the Victorville site and costs associated with the changes anticipated at the Green River facility through 2012. The transition expenses include anticipated severance costs and accelerated depreciation of equipment at the Company’s Green River facility and one-time project expenses.future.  The Company has recorded approximately $2.3 million of accelerated depreciation expense and $1.2 million of transition costs in cost of sales for the year ended 2011. These expenditures are being recorded in the Consumer Domestic segment.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

never incurred a goodwill impairment charge.

 

10. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

8.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010 

Trade accounts payable

  $231.8    $206.3  

 

$

284.1

 

 

$

256.7

 

Accrued marketing and promotion costs

   89.0     83.9  

 

 

114.8

 

 

 

123.7

 

Accrued wages and related costs

   36.0     38.9  

Accrued profit sharing

   10.5     11.5  

Accrued wages and related benefit costs

 

 

54.0

 

 

 

67.0

 

Other accrued current liabilities

   12.0     14.7  

 

 

54.8

 

 

 

47.7

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $379.3    $355.3  

 

$

507.7

 

 

$

495.1

 

  

 

   

 

 

11. Short-Term Borrowings

71


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and Long-Term Debtper share data)

9.

Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

Short-term borrowings and long-term debt consist of the following:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 

Short-term borrowings

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securitization of accounts receivable

  $0.0   $90.0  

Commercial paper issuances

 

$

143.3

 

 

$

150.0

 

Various debt due to international banks

   2.6    0.0  

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

3.8

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total short-term borrowings

  $2.6   $90.0  

 

$

146.7

 

 

$

153.8

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.875% Senior notes due October 1, 2022

 

$

400.0

 

 

$

400.0

 

Less: Discount

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

3.35% Senior notes due December 15, 2015

  $250.0   $250.0  

 

 

250.0

 

 

 

250.0

 

Less: Discount

   (0.3  (0.3

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

  

 

  

 

 

2.45% Senior notes due December 15, 2019

 

 

300.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Less: Discount

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt

instrument

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

Total long-term debt

 

 

948.5

 

 

 

649.5

 

Less: current maturities

 

 

(249.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

Net long-term debt

  $249.7   $249.7  

 

$

698.6

 

 

$

649.5

 

  

 

  

 

 

Revolving Credit Facility

On December 19, 2014, the Company replaced its former $500 credit facility with a $600 unsecured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”).  Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has the ability to increase its borrowing up to an additional $500, subject to lender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement.  

The Credit Agreement supports the Company’s $500 commercial paper program (the “Program”).  Total combined borrowing for both the Credit Agreement and the Program may not exceed $600.  Unless extended, the Credit Agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on December 19, 2019.  

Interest on the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement will accrue at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (x) either (at the Company’s option) (i) the adjusted LIBOR rate (generally, the LIBOR rate for an interest period selected by the Company and adjusted for statutory reserves) or (ii) the Base Rate (generally equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of America’s “prime rate” and (c) the adjusted LIBOR rate for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%) plus (y) the applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined based upon the corporate credit rating of the Company and ranges from 0.875% to 1.75% per annum, in the case of any borrowing bearing interest by reference to the adjusted LIBOR rate, and 0% to 0.75%, in the case of any borrowing bearing interest by reference to the Base Rate.

The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including without limitation, restrictions on the indebtedness, liens, investments, asset dispositions, fundamental changes, changes in the nature of the business conducted, affiliate transactions, burdensome agreements and use of proceeds.  

Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain its leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to Consolidated EBITDA, at a level no greater than 3.50 to 1.00.  However, if the Company consummates a material acquisition, the maximum leverage ratio increases to a level of 3.75 to 1.00 during the twelve month period commencing on the date of such acquisition.  The Company was in compliance with the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2014.     

The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including without limitation, failure to make certain payments when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, events of bankruptcy, default on other indebtedness, changes in control with respect to the Company, material adverse judgments, certain events relating to pension plans and the failure of any of the loan documents relating to the Credit Agreement to remain in full force and effect.  Certain parties to the

72


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Credit Agreement, and affiliates of those parties, provide banking, investment banking and other financial services to the Company from time to time.   

2.45% Senior Notes

On December 9, 2014, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $300 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”).  The 2019 Notes were issued under the first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 9, 2014, to the indenture dated December 9, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee.  Interest on the 2019 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning June 15, 2015.  The 2019 Notes will mature on December 15, 2019, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below.

The Company may redeem the 2019 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2019 Notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), plus 15 basis points.  In addition, at any time on or after November 15, 2019 (one month prior to the maturity date of the notes), the Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed.  In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), and if, generally within 60 days thereafter, the 2019 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the First Supplemental Indenture, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the 2019 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

The 2019 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding.  The 2019 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such secured debt, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The Base Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to create liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company's assets.  These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.

2.875% Senior Notes

On September 26, 2012, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $400 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”).  The 2022 Notes were issued under the second supplemental indenture dated September 26, 2012 (the “BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture”), to the indenture dated December 15, 2010 (the “BNY Mellon Base Indenture”), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (“BNY Mellon”), as trustee.  Interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning April 1, 2013.  The 2022 Notes will mature on October 1, 2022, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below.

The Company may redeem the 2022 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture), plus 20 basis points.  In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” (as defined in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture), and if, generally within 60 days thereafter, the 2022 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the 2022 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

The 2022 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding.  The 2022 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such secured debt, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries.

73


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

The BNY Mellon Base Indenture and the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to create liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company's assets.  These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.

3.35% Senior Notes

On December 15, 2010,  the Company completed an underwritten public offering of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 3.35% senior notes due 2015 (the “Notes”“2015 Notes”).  The 2015 Notes were issued under anthe BNY Mellon Base Indenture, and a first supplemental indenture, dated December 15, 2010 (the “Indenture”), and a first supplemental indenture (the “First“BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 15, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New YorkBNY Mellon, Trust Company, N.A., as trustee relating to the Notes. trustee.  On December 30, 2010, the proceeds of the offering were utilized to retire the outstanding $250 million principal amount of the Company’s 6% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012.  The unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.3 million associated with the Senior Subordinated Notes was charged to other expense in the fourth quarter in 2010.

Interest on the 2015 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2011.  The 2015 Notes will mature on December 15, 2015, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below.

The Company may redeem the 2015 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed; and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture), plus 25 basis points.  In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” as defined by the BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture, and if, generally

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

within 60 days thereafter, the 2015 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the BNY Mellon First Supplemental Indenture, the Company may be required to offer to repurchase the 2015 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

The 2015 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding.  The 2015 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture contain covenants with respect to the Company that, among other things, restrict the creation of liens, sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. The covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.

In addition, the Company has agreed to cause each subsidiary that guarantees its obligations under its senior unsecured credit facility to guarantee the Company’s obligations under the Notes on a senior unsecured basis. Currently, none of the Company’s subsidiaries guarantee the Company’s obligations under its senior unsecured credit facility.

Revolving Credit Facility

On November 18, 2010, the Company repaid its entire $408 million outstanding term loan debt and replaced its former credit facility with a new $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility. Under the credit agreement relating to the new revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), the Company has the ability to increase its revolving credit facility up to an additional $500 million, subject to lender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement. Unless extended, the revolving credit facility will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on August 4, 2016.Commercial Paper

The Company recently amended its Credit Agreement to support its inaugural $500 million commercial paper program. Total combined borrowing for both the revolving credit facility and the commercial paper program may not exceed $500 million.

Interest on the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement is based, at the Company’s option, upon either (i) the Base Rate (generally equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) Bank of America’s prime rate and (c) a LIBOR-based rate plus 1.00% or (ii) the Eurocurrency Rate (generally, the LIBOR-based rate). Depending upon the better of the credit rating for either Moody’s or S&P or the leverage ratio of the Company (described below), interest on borrowings accrues at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% per annum above the Base Rate and 1.25% to 2.25% per annum above the Eurocurrency Rate.

The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including without limitation, restrictions on the following: indebtedness, liens, investments, asset dispositions, fundamental changes, changes in the nature of the business conducted, affiliate transactions, burdensome agreements and use of proceeds.

Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of “Consolidated EBITDA” (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to Consolidated Interest Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement), of 3.00 to 1.00. The Company also is required to keep its leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Consolidated EBITDA, below a level of 3.25 to 1.00. However, if the Company consummates a material acquisition, the maximum leverage ratio increases to a level of 3.50 to 1.00 during the twelve month period commencing on the date of such acquisition.

The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including without limitation, failure to make certain payments when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, events of bankruptcy, default on other indebtedness, changes in control with respect to the Company, material adverse judgments, certain events relating to pension plans and the failure of any of the loan documents to remain in full force and effect. Certain parties to the Credit Agreement, and affiliates of those parties, provide banking, investment banking and other financial services to the Company from time to time.

As a result of the termination of its term loan in 2010, the Company also terminated its interest rate collar and swap cash flow hedge agreements, and recorded interest expense of $4.6 million in 2010. The unamortized deferred financing costs of $3.2 million associated with the term loan were charged to other expense in the fourth quarter in 2010.

Commercial Paper Program

In the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered intohas an agreement with two banks to establish a commercial paper program (the “Program”).  Under the Program, the Company may issue notes from time to time up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any given time of $500 million.$500.  The maturities of the notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days.  The notes will be sold under customary terms in the commercial paper market and will be issued at a discount to par or, alternatively, will be sold at par and will bear varying interest rates based on a fixed or floating rate basis.  The interest rates will vary based on market conditions and the ratings assigned to the notes by the credit rating agencies designated in the agreement at the time of issuance.  Subject to market conditions, the Company intends to utilize the Program as its primary short-term borrowing facility and does not intend to sell unsecured commercial paper notes in excess of the available amount under the revolving credit agreement.  If, for any reason, the Company is unable to access the commercial paper market, the revolving credit facility would be utilized to meet the Company’s short-term liquidity needs.  The Company did not issue any notes underhad $143.3 of commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2014 with a weighted-average interest rate less than 0.50% and $150.0 as of December 31, 2013 with a weighted-average interest rate less than 0.4%.

Interest Rate Swaps

Concurrent with the Program in 2011.

Securitization

In 2003,2019 Notes offering, the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement with an issuerinterest rate swaps to hedge changes in the fair value of receivables-backed commercial paper in order to refinance a portionthe 2019 Notes.  Under the terms of its primary credit facility and to lower its financing costs by accessing the commercial paper market. Under this arrangement,swaps, the counterparties will pay the Company sold,a fixed rate of 2.45% and agreed to sell from time to time throughout the term of the agreement (which is renewed annually), its trade accounts receivable to a wholly-owned, consolidated, special purpose finance subsidiary, Harrison Street Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Harrison”). Harrison in turn sold, and agreed to sell on an ongoing basis, to the commercial paper issuer an undivided interest in the pool of accounts receivable. During 2011, the Company repaidwill pay interest at a netfloating rate of $90.0 million under its accounts receivable securitization facility. During 2011, the Company terminated the accounts receivable securitization facility,three-month LIBOR plus a fixed spread of 0.756%.  The swaps are designated as fair value hedging instruments and are deemed to be effective December 30, 2011 as notes issued under the Program bear a lower interest rate than notes issued under the securitization program.in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.

Other Debt

The Company’s Brazilian subsidiary Quimica Geral do Nordeste S.A (“QGN”), has lines of credit that enable it to borrow in its local currency subject to various interest rates that are determined by several local inflation indexes.fluctuate with the interbank interest rate.  The various lines of credit will expire atduring the endfirst two quarters of 2012,2015, but are expected to be renewed.  Amounts available under the lines of credit total $6.4 million.$6.0.  There were borrowings of $2.6 million$3.4 and $3.8 outstanding as of December 31, 20112014 and 2013, respectively, under this facility.the lines of credit.

74


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

12. Income Taxes

10.

Income Taxes

The components of income before taxes are as follows:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010   2009 

Domestic

  $441.1    $382.2    $364.2  

 

$

574.1

 

 

$

544.5

 

 

$

481.8

 

Foreign

   53.5     36.1     28.0  

 

 

50.8

 

 

 

53.3

 

 

 

60.7

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $494.6    $418.3    $392.2  

 

$

624.9

 

 

$

597.8

 

 

$

542.5

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table summarizes the provision for U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 2009 

Current:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

  $92.7   $79.0   $93.8  

 

$

159.0

 

 

$

151.7

 

 

$

132.0

 

State

   16.3    15.4    18.8  

 

 

24.4

 

 

 

24.7

 

 

 

27.7

 

Foreign

   16.6    14.3    13.0  

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

19.8

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   125.6    108.7    125.6  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

198.3

 

 

 

192.3

 

 

 

179.5

 

Deferred:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

   48.7    34.0    18.2  

 

 

11.5

 

 

 

12.6

 

 

 

11.4

 

State

   (3.3  8.0    7.1  

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

1.6

 

Foreign

   14.0    (3.1  (2.2

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

13.2

 

   59.4    38.9    23.1  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total provision

  $185.0   $147.6   $148.7  

 

$

211.0

 

 

$

203.4

 

 

$

192.7

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 

Deferred tax assets:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

  $4.5   $8.6  

 

$

4.6

 

 

$

4.4

 

Deferred compensation

   45.6    44.0  

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

57.2

 

Pension, postretirement and postemployment benefits

   15.1    13.8  

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

9.7

 

Reserves

   16.2    24.7  

 

 

27.2

 

 

 

31.6

 

Tax credit carryforwards/other tax attributes

   0.3    3.5  

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.5

 

Net international operating loss carryforwards

   11.3    11.3  
  

 

  

 

 

International operating loss carryforwards

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

8.1

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

   93.0    105.9  

 

 

115.2

 

 

 

112.5

 

Valuation allowances

   (17.8  (3.5

 

 

(12.0

)

 

 

(13.0

)

  

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   75.2    102.4  

 

 

103.2

 

 

 

99.5

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

   (129.8  (117.1

 

 

(174.7

)

 

 

(159.7

)

Tradenames and other intangibles

   (130.3  (120.4

Trade Names and other intangibles

 

 

(300.6

)

 

 

(292.2

)

Property, plant and equipment

   (98.1  (78.9

 

 

(97.5

)

 

 

(106.2

)

  

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (358.2  (316.4

 

 

(572.8

)

 

 

(558.1

)

  

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $(283.0 $(214.0

 

$

(469.6

)

 

$

(458.6

)

  

 

  

 

 

Current net deferred tax asset

  $6.0   $16.3  

 

$

14.4

 

 

$

16.6

 

Long term net deferred tax asset

   3.3    24.0  

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.8

 

Long term net deferred tax liability

   (292.3  (254.3

 

 

(484.1

)

 

 

(476.0

)

  

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $(283.0 $(214.0

 

$

(469.6

)

 

$

(458.6

)

  

 

  

 

 

75


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

The difference between tax expense and the tax that would result from the application of the federal statutory rate is as follows:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 2009 

Statutory rate

   35  35  35

 

 

35

%

 

 

35

%

 

 

35

%

Tax that would result from use of the federal statutory rate

  $173.1   $146.4   $137.3  

 

$

218.7

 

 

$

209.2

 

 

$

189.9

 

State and local income tax, net of federal effect

   12.1    15.2    16.8  

 

 

16.5

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

19.0

 

Varying tax rates of foreign affiliates

   (2.5  (1.5  0.4  

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

(1.8

)

Benefit from domestic manufacturing deduction

   (8.3  (8.5  (5.1

 

 

(14.3

)

 

 

(13.2

)

 

 

(11.6

)

Resolution of tax contingencies

   (3.7  (4.1  0.0  

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(3.2

)

Valuation Allowances

   14.3    0.0    0.0  

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

Other

   0.0    0.1    (0.7

 

 

(5.7

)

 

 

(5.0

)

 

 

(0.2

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Recorded tax expense

  $185.0   $147.6   $148.7  

 

$

211.0

 

 

$

203.4

 

 

$

192.7

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective tax rate

   37.4  35.3  37.9

 

 

33.8

%

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

35.5

%

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

At December 31, 2011,2014, certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $44 million.$26.7.  Approximately one third$1.7 of thesuch net operating loss carryforwards expire on various dates through December 31, 2018.  The remaining net operating loss carryforwards are not subject to expiration.

The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain foreignthese net operating loss carryforwards will not be realized.  In recognition of this risk, the Company has provided a valuation allowance of $10.4 million$8.0 and $3.5 million$8.1 at December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively, on the deferred tax asset relating to these foreign net operating loss carryforwards.

The Company also believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain additional deferred tax assets of its Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral do Nordeste SA,QGN will not be realized.  In recognition of this risk, the Company recordedmaintains a valuation allowance of $7.4 million$4.0 and $4.9 at December 31, 20112014 and 2013, respectively, on these deferred tax assets.

The Company hashad undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries of approximately $199 million$315.4 at December 31, 20112014 for which U.S. deferred taxes have not been provided.  These earnings, which are considered to be permanently reinvested, would be subject to U.S. tax if they were remitted as dividends.  It is not practicable to determine the deferred tax liability on these earnings because of the large number of assumptions necessary to compute the tax. The Company continues to monitor events or circumstances that may change its intention to remit undistributed earnings.

The Company has recorded liabilities in connection with uncertain tax positions, which, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by tax authorities.  Under applicable accounting guidance, these tax positions do not meet the minimum threshold required for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011 2010 2009 

Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1

  $24.6   $39.6   $35.5  

 

$

5.9

 

 

$

9.1

 

 

$

13.1

 

Gross increases—tax positions in current period

   0.0    0.0    4.1  

Gross increases—tax positions in prior period

   1.0    4.6    10.1  

Gross decreases—tax positions in prior period

   (5.5  (14.2  (6.2

Gross increases - tax positions in prior period

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.9

 

Gross decreases - tax positions in prior period

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(3.2

)

Settlements

   (6.8  (4.9  (3.7

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(3.7

)

 

 

(2.6

)

Lapse of statute of limitations

   (0.2  (0.5  (0.2

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.1

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31

  $13.1   $24.6   $39.6  

 

$

4.0

 

 

$

5.9

 

 

$

9.1

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Substantially all material federal, state, and international income tax matters have been effectively concluded for years through 2007. In 2011,2014, the Company recognized a benefit from the reversal of approximately $3.7 million$1.7 in income tax expense and $1.6 million$0.1 in pretax interest expense associated with certain tax liabilities as athe result of the settlement of various state auditsan IRS audit for the years 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitation of several state taxing authorities.  In 2010,2012, the Company recognized a benefit from the reversal of approximately $4.0 million$3.3 in income tax expense and $3.0 millionincurred $0.2 in pretax interest expense associated with certain tax liabilities as a result of the settlement of an IRS audit for the years 2008 and 2009 and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitation of several state taxing authorities.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 are $12.1 million, $15.0 million$3.9, $5.7 and $19.9 million,$8.7, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.  Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at

76


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, are $1.0 million, $9.6 million$0.1, $0.2 and $19.7 million,$0.4, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in adjustments to balance sheet tax accounts, primarily deferred taxes.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as the income tax in multiple state and international jurisdictions. Substantially all material federal, state, and international income tax matters have been effectively closed for years through 2007. The Company closed theIRS has completed its audit of tax years 2008 and 2009 with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service on February 6,through 2012.  The tax years 2008 and 2009 areCompany is currently under audit by several state and international taxing authorities. In addition, certainauthorities for the years 2010 through 2013.  The Company does not anticipate that the settlement of audits and the expirations of statutes of limitations are scheduled to expire in the near future. It is reasonably possible that a decrease of approximately $6.8 million in the unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months related to the settlement of these audits or the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. Of this amount, $0.6 million wouldwill result in adjustments to balance sheeta significant change in unrecognized tax accounts, primarily deferred taxes and would not affect the effective tax rate.benefits.

The Company’s policy for recording interest associated with incomeuncertain tax examinationspositions is to record interest as a component of Incomeincome before Income Taxes.income taxes.  During the twelve months ended December 31, 2011,2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2010,2012, the Company recognized a net reversal of accrued interest expense associated with uncertain tax positions of approximately $1.9 million,$0.1, $0.1, and $4.2 million,$0.3, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized approximately $1.9 million in interest expense associated with uncertain tax positions.  As of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2010,2013, the Company had $0.7 million$0.2 and $2.6 million,$0.3, respectively, in accrued interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits.

13. Benefit Plans

11.

Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain international employees.  Pension benefits to retired employees are based upon the employees’ length of service and a percentage of their qualifying compensation during the final years of employment.  The Company’s pension funding policy is consistent with federal/statutory funding requirements.  The Company also maintains unfunded postretirement plans, which provide medical benefits for eligible domesticU.S. retirees and their dependents and for retirees and employees in Canada.  The cost of such benefits is recognized during the employees’ respective active working careers.  The Company recognizes the unfunded status of a benefit plan in the balance sheet which isas a long-term liability forand recognizes the Company.overfunded status of any benefit plan as a long-term asset.  Any previously unrecognized gains or losses are recorded in the equity section of the balance sheet within accumulated other comprehensive income.

International Pension Plan Termination

On December 31, 2014, the Company terminated an international defined benefit pension plan under which approximately 280 participants, including approximately 100 active employees, have accrued benefits.  The Company anticipates completing the termination of this plan by the end of the second quarter of 2015, once regulatory approvals are obtained.  To effect the termination, the Company estimates, based on December 31, 2014 valuations, that the plan has sufficient assets to purchase annuities for retired participants and make certain deposits to the existing defined contribution plan of active employee participants.  The Company estimates that it will incur a one-time non-cash expense of approximately $8 to $11 ($6 to $8 after tax) in 2015 when the plan settlement is completed.  This expense is primarily attributable to pension settlement accounting rules which require accelerated recognition of actuarial losses that were to be amortized over the expected benefit lives of participants.  The estimated expense is subject to change based on valuations at the actual date of settlement.

77


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

U.S. Pension Plan Termination

On January 27, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the termination, effective April 15, 2010, of The Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees (the “U.S. Pension Plan”), under which approximately 766 participants, including 46 active employees, have accrued benefits. On December 1, 2010, the Company as plan sponsor of the U.S. Pension Plan, purchased a non participating group annuity contract from the Principal Life Insurance Company for the benefit of certain former and current employees with vested benefits in, and retired participants currently receiving benefits from, the U.S. Pension Plan. In addition, effective December 1, 2010, an existing participating annuity contract with Aetna Insurance Company was changed to a non-participating annuity contract.

The purchase price of the contracts was approximately $63 million, which was funded from the assets of the U.S. Pension Plan on December 1, 2010 (considered the measurement date for accounting purposes) and a one-time payment by the Company of approximately $14 million ($9 million after taxes). The transactions resulted in the transfer and settlement of the U.S. pension benefit obligation, thus relieving the Company of any responsibility for the U.S. Pension Plan obligations.

As a result of the transfer of the U.S. Pension Plan obligations and assets described above, the Company recorded a charge to earnings in the fourth quarter of 2010 of approximately $24 million pre-tax or $0.11 per share. This charge is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following table provides information on the status of the defined benefit plans at December 31:

 

  Pension Plans  Nonpension
Postretirement Plans
 

(In millions)

     2011          2010          2011          2010     

Change in Benefit Obligation:

    

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $81.2   $129.8   $24.3   $22.3  

Service cost

  0.9    1.7    0.4    0.3  

Interest cost

  4.6    6.9    1.3    1.3  

Plan participants’ contributions

  0.0    0.2    0.3    0.2  

Actuarial loss

  7.0    16.1    3.0    1.4  

Settlements/curtailments

  0.0    (64.4  (0.5  0.0  

Effects of exchange rate changes / other

  (1.0  (1.1  (0.1  0.2  

Benefits paid

  (4.6  (8.0  (1.5  (1.4
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 $88.1   $81.2   $27.2   $24.3  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change in Plan Assets:

    

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 $67.9   $113.7   $0.0   $0.0  

Actual return on plan assets (net of expenses)

  3.2    6.8    0.0    0.0  

Employer contributions

  4.8    19.3    1.2    1.3  

Plan participants’ contributions

  0.0    0.3    0.3    0.2  

Effects of exchange rate changes / other

  (0.8  (1.0  0.0    0.0  

Settlements

  0.0    (63.2  0.0    0.0  

Benefits paid

  (4.6  (8.0  (1.5  (1.5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 $70.5   $67.9   $0.0   $0.0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded status at end of year, recorded in Pension and Postretirement Benefits

 $(17.6 $(13.3 $(27.2 $(24.3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:

    

Prior Service Credit

 $0.1   $(0.1 $(0.5 $0.1  

Actuarial Loss

  17.6    10.2    3.7    0.8  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Loss (Income) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 $17.7   $10.1   $3.2   $0.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Nonpension

 

 

 

Pension Plans

 

 

Postretirement  Plans

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

100.6

 

 

$

99.7

 

 

$

21.8

 

 

$

30.0

 

Service cost

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.4

 

Interest cost

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

Plan participants’ contributions

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

Actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

(4.9

)

Settlements/curtailments

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.7

)

Effects of exchange rate changes / other

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.4

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(4.3

)

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(2.0

)

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

101.2

 

 

$

100.6

 

 

$

24.5

 

 

$

21.8

 

Change in Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

100.2

 

 

$

78.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Actual return on plan assets (net of expenses)

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Employer contributions

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.7

 

Plan participants’ contributions

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

Settlements/curtailments

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Effects of exchange rate changes / other

 

 

(7.3

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(4.3

)

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(2.0

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

101.8

 

 

$

100.2

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Funded status at end of year, recorded in Pension and

   Postretirement Benefits

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

(0.4

)

 

$

(24.5

)

 

$

(21.8

)

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other

   Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior Service Credit

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

(0.8

)

 

$

(2.3

)

Actuarial Loss

 

 

19.8

 

 

 

18.5

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

0.8

 

Net Loss (Income) Recognized in Accumulated Other

   Comprehensive Income

 

$

19.9

 

 

$

18.6

 

 

$

2.7

 

 

$

(1.5

)

 

Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonpension

 

  Pension Plans Nonpension
Postretirement Plans
 

 

Pension Plans

 

 

Postretirement Plans

 

(In millions)

      2011         2010         2011         2010     

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

  $(17.6 $(13.3 $(27.2 $(24.3

 

$

(3.4

)

 

$

(3.4

)

 

$

(24.5

)

 

$

(21.8

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss(income)

   17.7    10.1    3.2    0.9  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other Assets

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Income)

 

 

19.9

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

(1.5

)

Net amount recognized at end of year

  $0.1   $(3.2 $(24.0 $(23.4

 

$

20.5

 

 

$

18.2

 

 

$

(21.8

)

 

$

(23.3

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $85.4   $78.3   $0.0   $0.0  

 

$

100.0

 

 

$

95.4

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

In 2011,2014, the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) was a $7.6 million$1.3 increase in the Company’s remaining pension plan obligations and a $2.3 million$4.4 increase in postretirement benefit plan obligations.  The changes are primarily related to the change in discount rates for all plans.plans and other actuarial assumptions.

Weighted-average78


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Weighted‑average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of December 31:31 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonpension

 

  Pension Plans Postretirement Plans 

 

Pension Plans

 

 

Postretirement Plans

 

      2011         2010         2011         2010     

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Discount Rate

   4.73  5.32  4.32  5.28

 

 

3.54%

 

 

 

4.48%

 

 

 

3.77%

 

 

 

4.56%

 

Rate of Compensation increase

   3.30  3.65  N/A    N/A  

 

 

3.13%

 

 

 

3.33%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Net Pension and Net Postretirement Benefit Costs consisted of the following components:

 

 

Pension Costs

 

 

Nonpension Postretirement Costs

 

  Pension Costs Nonpension Postretirement Costs 

 

2014

 

��

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

      2011         2010         2009         2011           2010           2009     

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

  $0.9   $1.7   $1.6   $0.4    $0.3    $0.3  

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.4

 

Interest cost

   4.6    6.9    6.8    1.3     1.3     1.2  

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.2

 

Expected return on plan assets

   (4.3  (5.1  (6.3  0.0     0.0     0.0  

 

 

(6.1

)

 

 

(4.2

)

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Amortization of prior service cost

   0.0    0.0    0.4    0.1     0.1     0.1  

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Settlements/curtailments

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

0.0

 

Recognized actuarial loss (gain)

   0.0    0.7    1.4    0.0     0.0     0.0  

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Settlement (gain) loss

   0.0    24.3    (0.7  0.0     0.0     0.0  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $1.2   $28.5   $3.2   $1.8    $1.7    $1.6  

 

$

(0.3

)

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

(0.2

)

 

$

0.5

 

 

$

1.7

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

In 2012, amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized in the income statement are estimated to be negligible.

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31:31 are as follows:

 

  Pension Plans  Nonpension Postretirement Plans 
      2011          2010          2009          2011          2010          2009     

Discount Rate

  5.34  5.75  6.61  5.28  5.80  6.48

Rate of Compensation increase

  3.68  3.73  4.07  N/A    N/A    N/A  

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

  5.87  5.76  6.72  N/A    N/A    N/A  

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

Pension Costs

 

 

Nonpension Postretirement Costs

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Discount Rate

 

 

4.28%

 

 

 

4.15%

 

 

 

4.75%

 

 

 

4.54%

 

 

 

3.92%

 

 

 

4.31%

 

Rate of Compensation increase

 

 

3.13%

 

 

 

3.33%

 

 

 

3.33%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

 

 

6.16%

 

 

 

5.45%

 

 

 

5.35%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

The Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed fromwith the assistance of actuarial valuations.  These valuations reflect key assumptions provided by the Company to its actuaries, including the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.  Material changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions.

The discount rate is subject to change each year, consistent with changes in applicable high-quality, long-term corporate bond indices.  Based on the expected duration of the benefit payments for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement plans, the Company refers to an applicable index and expected term of the benefit payments to select a discount rate at which it believes the pensionplan benefits could be effectively settled.

The expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is selected by taking into account athe historical trend, the expected duration of the projected benefit obligation for the plans, the asset mix of the plans and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation.  A 50 basis point change in the expected long-term rate of return would result in an approximate $0.4 million$0.5 change in pension expense for 2012.2015.

In 2015, amounts related to defined benefit plans in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized in the income statement are estimated to be income of approximately $0.2.

The Company’s investment policy is designed to provide flexibility in the asset mix based on management’s assessment of economic conditions, with an overall objective of realizing maximum rates of return appropriately balanced to minimize market risks.  OurThe Company’s long-term strategic goal is to maintain an asset mix consisting of approximately 60% equity securities and 40% debt/guaranteed investment securities.

79


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

The fair values of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets at by asset category are as follows:

 

Fair Value Measurements

(In millions)

      Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
   Significant
Observable
Inputs
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
  Total   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3) 

Asset Category

        

Cash & Cash Equivalents

  $0.4    $0.4    $0.0    $0.0  

Equity Securities—Mutual Funds(a)

   14.3     0.4     13.9     0.0  

Bond Funds(b)

   9.8     0.1     9.7     0.0  

Government Fixed Income Securities

   9.7     0.0     9.7     0.0  

Global Multi-strategy Fund(c)

   27.7     0.0     0.0     27.7  

Insurance Investment Contract(d)

   4.3     0.0     0.0     4.3  

Other(e)

   1.7     0.3     1.2     0.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

  $67.9    $1.2    $34.5    $32.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

  $0.4    $0.4    $0.0    $0.0  

Equity Securities—Mutual Funds(a)

   13.0     0.4     12.6     0.0  

Bond Funds(b)

   9.2     0.0     9.2     0.0  

Government Fixed Income Securities

   14.2     0.1     14.1     0.0  

Global Multi-strategy Fund(c)

   27.7     0.0     0.0     27.7  

Insurance Investment Contract(d)

   4.7     0.0     0.0     4.7  

Other(e)

   1.3     0.2     1.1     0.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  $70.5    $1.1    $37.0    $32.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Significant

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

$

9.0

 

 

$

9.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Equity Securities - Mutual Funds (a)

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

15.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

Money Market Funds

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

Bond Funds(b)

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

Global Multi-strategy Fund(c)

 

 

37.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

37.8

 

Insurance Investment Contract(e)

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

5.9

 

Government Fixed Income Securities(f)

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

Other (g)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

December 31, 2013

 

$

100.2

 

 

$

10.2

 

 

$

46.3

 

 

$

43.7

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

$

1.9

 

 

1.9

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Equity Securities - Mutual Funds (a)

 

 

35.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

33.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

Money Market Funds

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

Bond Funds(b)

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

Global Multi-strategy Fund(d)

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

Insurance Investment Contract(e)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

Government Fixed Income Securities(f)

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

0.0

 

Other (g)

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

December 31, 2014

 

$

101.8

 

 

$

3.2

 

 

$

98.6

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

(a)

The equity securities represent mutual funds held primarily by the pension plans in Canada and the United Kingdom, which include both domestic and international equity securities.  Mutual funds are valued at quoted market prices, which represent the net asset values of shares held by the plans as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014.

(b)

The bond funds constitutes investments primarily for the pension planplans in Canada and the fund consists of investments in Canadian government, corporationscorporate and municipal or local governments bonds.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(c)

The global multi-strategy fund constitutes investmentsan indexed fund for the pension planplans in the United Kingdom.Kingdom as of December 31, 2013.  The fund, iswhich was sold during 2014, was a fund of funds invested in a series of diverse international equity funds and fixed income funds.

(d)

The global multi-strategy fund, which was purchased during 2014 for the pension plans in the United Kingdom, represents a series of multiple asset diversified funds invested in equities, bonds and other investments.  The global multi-strategy fund is valued at the net asset value per unit multiplied by the number of units held as of the measurement date.

(e)

The insurance investment contract is in the form of an insurance policy that iswas held by the pension planplans in the United Kingdom.  The investment of the underlying assets iswas in various managed funds.  Insurance contracts are valued at book value, which approximates fair value, and are calculated using the prior year balance adjusted for investment returns and changes in cash flows.

(e)

(f)

Government fixed income securities held by pension plans in the United Kingdom are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date.

(g)

Other category includes money market funds and equity securities /other investments for pension plans in the international companies.subsidiaries.

80


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 Investments) are as follows:

 

(In millions)

  Fixed Income
Fund (Other)
  Global Multi-
strategy Fund
  Insurance
Investment
Contract
  Total 

Investments

     

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $18.1   $26.6   $4.3   $49.0  

Service Fees

   (0.1  0.0    0.0    (0.1

Net realized and unrealized gains (loss)

   1.4    2.6    0.2    4.2  

Purchases, sales, and distributions

   (1.4  0.0    0.0    (1.4

Pension Obligation Settlement

   (13.6  0.0    0.0    (13.6

Transfers in and/or out

   (4.2  0.0    0.0    (4.2

Effects of exchange rate changes

   0.0    (1.5  (0.2  (1.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $0.2   $27.7   $4.3   $32.2  

Net realized and unrealized gains (loss)

   0.0    0.4    0.4    0.8  

Pension Obligation Settlement

   0.0    (0.4  0.0    (0.4

Transfers in and/or out

   (0.2  0.0    0.0    (0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $0.0   $27.7   $4.7   $32.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Multi-

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

 

Investments

 

strategy Fund

 

 

Contract

 

 

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

31.8

 

 

$

5.3

 

 

$

37.1

 

Net realized and unrealized gains (loss)

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

5.8

 

Effects of exchange rate changes

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.8

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

37.8

 

 

$

5.9

 

 

$

43.7

 

Net realized and unrealized gains (loss)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.5

 

Purchases, sales and distributions

 

 

(38.2

)

 

 

(6.3

)

 

 

(44.5

)

Effects of exchange rate changes

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

The Company made cash contributions of approximately $4.8 million$3.3 to its pension plans in 2011.2014.  The Company estimates it will be required to make cash contributions to its pension plans of approximately $3.6 million$2.4 in 20122015 to offset 20122015 benefit payments and administrative costs in excess of investment returns.

The following benefit payments are expected to be paid from the defined benefit plans:plans (excluding the benefits to be paid at the completed settlement of the international pension plan):

 

(In millions)

  Pension
Plans
   Nonpension
Postretirement
Plans
 

2012

  $3.8    $1.2  

2013

   3.9     1.3  

2014

   3.9     1.4  

2015

   4.1     1.5  

2016

   4.1     1.6  

2017-2021

   22.7     9.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonpension

 

 

 

Pension

 

 

Postretirement

 

 

 

Plans

 

 

Plans

 

2015

 

$

2.7

 

 

$

1.5

 

2016

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

1.6

 

2017

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

1.7

 

2018

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

1.8

 

2018

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

1.9

 

2020-2024

 

 

15.7

 

 

 

9.4

 

The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation has been determined by application of the provisions of the Company’sCompany's medical plans, including established maximums and sharing of costs, relevant actuarial assumptions and health-carehealth‑care cost trend rates projected at approximately 9.0 %7.2% for 20122015 and decreasing to an ultimate rate of approximately 5.0 %4.5% in 2029.  The Company has a maximum annual benefit based on years of service for those participants over 65 years of age.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following chart shows the effect of a 1% change in healthcare cost trends:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

(in millions)

  2011 2010 

Effect of 1% increase in health-care cost trend rates on:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement benefit obligation

  $2.0   $1.9  

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

0.7

 

Total of service cost and interest cost component

   0.2    0.2  

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.9

 

Effect of 1% decrease in health-care cost trend rates on:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement benefit obligation

   (1.7  (1.7

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Total of service cost and interest cost component

   (0.1  (0.1

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.7

)

Other Benefit Plans

The Company also maintains a defined contribution profit sharing plan for domestic salaried and certain hourly employees.  Amounts charged to earnings for this plan were $10.5 million, $11.5 million$12.5, $15.8 and $17.3 million$13.5 in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.  The higher expense in 2009 was due to a higher profit-sharing contribution to the plan, reflecting improved Company performance.

The Company also has a domestic employee 401K savings plan.  The Company currently matches 50% of each employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s earnings.  The Company’s matching contributions to the savings plan were $3.7 million, $3.7 million$4.5, $4.5 and $3.5 million$3.8 in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

The Company has an employee stock purchase plan which permits employees to purchase the Company’s Common Stock at a 15% discount to the prevailing market price. No more than $25 thousand can be purchased by any one employee during a plan year. The 15% discount is included in selling, general81


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and administrative expenses. Total expenses for 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $0.5 million each year.per share data)

Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan under which certain members of management are eligible to defer a maximum of 85% of their regular compensation (i.e. salary) and incentive bonus.  The amounts deferred under this plan are credited with earnings or losses based upon changes in values of notional investments elected by the plan participant.  The investment options available include notional investments in various stock, bond and money market funds as well as Company Common Stock.  Each plan participant is fully vested in the amounts the participant defers.  The plan also functions as an “excess” plan andwhereby profit sharing contributions that cannot otherwise be contributed to the qualified savings and profit sharing plan due to limitations under Department of Treasury regulations are credited to this plan.  These contributions vest under the same vesting schedule as is applicable to the qualified plan.

The liability to plan participants for contributions designated for notional investment in Company stockCommon Stock is based on the quoted fair value of the Company’s stockCommon Stock plus any dividends credited.  The Company uses cash-settled hedging instruments to minimize the cost related to the volatility of Company stock.Common Stock.  At December 31, 20112014 and 2010,2013, the amount of the Company’s liability under the deferred compensation plan was $64.1 million$92.2 and $57.7 million,$83.5, respectively and the funded balances amounted to $47.4 million$70.1 and $42.7 million,$62.8, respectively.  The amounts charged to earnings, including the effect of the hedges, totaled $2.9 million, $2.4 million,$1.8, $2.8, and $1.6 million$2.6 in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

Non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors are eligible to defer up to 100% of their directors’ compensation into a similar plan; however, the only option for investment is Company stock. DirectorsCommon Stock.  Members of the Board are always 100%fully vested in their account balance.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In 2009, the Company placed  As of December 31, 2014, there were approximately 240167 thousand shares of Company stockCommon Stock from shares held as Treasury Stock in a rabbi trust to protect the interest of the directors’ deferred compensation plan participants in the event of a change of control. The balance in this trust as of December 31, 2011 is approximately 139 thousand shares due to distributions to various directors.

14. Stock Based Compensation Plans

a. Stock Option Plans

12.

Stock Based Compensation Plans

The Company has options outstanding under four equity compensation plans.  Under the Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Plan, the Company may grant options and other stock-based awards to employees and directors.  Under the 1983 Stock Option Plan and the Stock Award Plan, the Company granted options to key management employees.  Under the Stock Option Plan for Directors, the Company granted options to non-employeenon‑employee directors.  Following adoption of the original Omnibus Equity Plan by stockholders in 2008, no further grants may be madewere permitted under the other equity compensation plans.  Options outstanding under the plans are issued at market value on the date of grant, vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant and must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.  If, upon termination of a participant’s employment (other than a termination for cause), a participant is at least 55 years old, has at least 5five years of service, and the sum of the participant’s age and years of service is at least 65, the participant may exercise any stock options granted in 2007 or later within a period of three years from the date of termination or, if earlier, the date such stock options otherwise would have expired,, subject to specified conditions.  A total of 10.5 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock are authorized for issuance upon the exercise of stock options. Issuances of Common Stock to satisfy employee option exercises currently are made from treasury stock.

Stock option transactions for the three years ended December 31, 20112014 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

  Options
(In millions)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(In  millions)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2008

   8.5   $17.71      

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Options

 

 

Price

 

 

Term

 

 

Value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

 

 

8.3

 

 

$

26.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

   1.4    27.04      

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

53.81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

   (0.9  10.58      

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

19.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

   (0.1  25.03      

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

35.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

     

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

   8.9    19.85      

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

 

 

8.2

 

 

$

32.81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

   1.2    33.34      

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

61.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

   (1.2  12.79      

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

21.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

   (0.1  27.95      

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

47.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

     

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

   8.8    22.63      

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

 

 

8.8

 

 

$

39.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

   1.2    40.60      

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

69.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

   (1.6  16.53      

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

25.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

   (0.1  30.22      

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

56.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

     

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

   8.3   $26.39     6.2    $160.1  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2011

   4.6   $20.68     4.4    $114.3  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

 

 

8.5

 

 

$

45.50

 

 

 

6.1

 

 

$

283.2

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2014

 

 

4.3

 

 

$

30.09

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

$

209.2

 

82


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

The following table below summarizes information relating to options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011.2014:

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

Options Exercisable

 

  Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

(In millions)

Range of

Exercise Prices

  Outstanding
as of
12/31/2011
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Exercisable
as of
12/31/2011
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$5.00 - $15.00

   0.9     1.9    $13.17     0.9    $13.17  

 

Outstanding

 

 

Average

 

 

Average

 

 

Exercisable

 

 

Average

 

Range of

 

as of

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Exercise

 

 

as of

 

 

Exercise

 

Exercise Prices

 

12/31/2014

 

 

Contractual Life

 

 

Price

 

 

12/31/2014

 

 

Price

 

$15.01 - $25.00

   2.4     4.5    $19.94     2.4    $19.94  

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

$

20.87

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

$

20.87

 

$25.01 - $35.00

   3.8     7.3    $29.24     1.2    $27.72  

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

$

29.51

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

$

29.51

 

$35.01 - $45.00

   1.2     9.5    $40.62     0.0    $0.0  

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

$

40.63

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

$

40.63

 

$45.01 - $55.00

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

$

53.80

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

$

0.00

 

$55.01 - $65.00

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

$

61.88

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

$

0.00

 

$65.01 - $75.00

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

$

69.54

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

$

0.00

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

6.1

 

 

$

45.50

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

$

30.09

 

   8.3     6.2    $26.39     4.6    $20.68  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The table above represents the Company’s estimate of options fully vested and expected to vest.  Expected forfeitures are not material and, therefore, are not reflected in the table above.

The following table provides information regarding the intrinsic value of stock options exercised and stock compensation expense related to stock option awards and the fair value of stock options issued:awards:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(in millions)

  2011   2010   2009 

Intrinsic Value of Stock Options Exercised

  $39.6    $25.5    $16.4  

 

$

58.0

 

 

$

42.2

 

 

$

48.9

 

Stock Compensation Expense Related to Stock Option Awards

  $10.0    $10.9    $11.8  

 

$

15.2

 

 

$

15.5

 

 

$

11.0

 

Issued Stock Options

   1.2     1.2     1.4  

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

1.6

 

Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options issued (per share)

  $7.87    $8.36    $7.42  

 

$

12.82

 

 

$

10.92

 

 

$

8.92

 

Fair Value of Stock Options Issued

  $9.5    $10.2    $10.5  

 

$

15.0

 

 

$

18.1

 

 

$

14.2

 

The following table provides a summary of the assumptions used in the valuation of issued stock options:

 

  2011 2010 2009 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Risk-free interest rate

   2.0  2.7  3.2

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

1.0

%

Expected life in Years

   6.2    6.5    6.4  

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

6.3

 

Expected volatility

   20.9  21.4  21.9

 

 

20.4

%

 

 

21.2

%

 

 

20.7

%

Dividend Yield

   1.7  0.8  0.7

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

1.8

%

The fair value of stock options is based upon the Black Scholes option pricing model.  The Company determined the stock options’ lifelives based on historical exercise behavior and determined the options’their expected volatility and dividend yield based on the historical changes in stock price and dividend payments.  The risk free interest rate is based on the yield of an applicable term Treasury instrument.

As of December 31, 2011,2014, there was a fair value of $6.9 million$9.4 related to unamortized stock option compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately one and a half years.  The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow reflectsreflect an add back to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of $11.0 million$17.0, $17.0 and $11.8 million$12.4 in 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively, for non cashnon-cash compensation expense, primarily stock option expense.  Net Cash Used inflow from Financing Activities includes $12.1, $7.3$18.5, $13.1 and $5.0 million$14.6 in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, of excess tax benefits on stock optionoptions exercised.  The total tax benefit for 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 20092012 was $13.3, $8.5$18.8, $13.4 and $5.8 million,$15.4, respectively.

13.

Share Repurchases

On January 29, 2014, the Board authorized the 2014 Share Repurchase Program.  The 2014 Share Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s share repurchase program announced on November 5, 2012.  In addition, the Board authorized an evergreen share

83


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

b. Restricted Stock Plan

During 2005, the Company instituted arepurchase program, under which officers who, during a specified period ofthe Company may repurchase, from time accumulateto time, shares of Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans.

In 2014, the Company purchased approximately 6.9 million shares of Common Stock or stock equivalents withfor $478.8, of which $86 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase program and $392.8 was purchased under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program.  As a valueresult of up to 50%these purchases, there remained $107.2 under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program as of their annual incentive compensation, will be awarded restricted shares having a fair market value of 20% of the amount of stock and stock equivalents that an officer accumulates. The restricted shares vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. During the three year vesting period, officers holding these shares will have voting rights and receive dividends either in cash or through reinvestment in additional shares.

Activity for the three years ended December 31, 2011 are as follows:2014.  

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010   2009 

Shares issued

   0.0     0.0     0.0  

Total value granted

  $0.8    $0.3    $0.3  

Compensation expense

  $0.4    $0.3    $0.4  

15. Comprehensive Income

14.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is defined as net income and other changes in stockholders’ equity from transactions and other events from sources other than stockholders.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

The following table provides information related to the Company’s comprehensive income for the three years ended December 31, 2011:

   Twelve Months Ended December 31, 

(In millions)

      2011          2010          2009     

Net Income

  $309.6   $270.7   $243.5  

Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax:

    

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

   (7.3  (2.5  34.1  

Derivative agreements

   1.2    0.8    1.1  

Reclassification adjustments for interest rate collar net loss included in net income

   0.0    2.6    0.0  

Defined benefit plan adjustments

    

Net periodic benefit cost

   (7.3  (3.2  (4.7

Reclassification adjustments for pension plan termination net loss included in net income

   0.0    8.5    0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

   296.2    276.9    274.0  

Comprehensive Income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   0.0    0.0    0.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

  $296.2   $276.9   $274.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) are as follows:

 

(In millions)

  Foreign
Currency
Adjustments
  Defined
Benefit
Plans
  Derivative
Agreements
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 

Balance December 31, 2008

  $(7.1 $(8.6 $(4.7 $(20.4

Comprehensive income changes during the year (net of taxes of $0.1)

   34.1    (4.7  1.1    30.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2009

   27.0    (13.3  (3.6  10.1  

Comprehensive income changes during the year (net of taxes of $6.5)

   (2.5  5.3    3.4    6.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2010

   24.5    (8.0  (0.2  16.3  

Comprehensive income changes during the year (net of taxes of $2.4)

   (7.3  (7.3  1.2    (13.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2011

  $17.2   $(15.3 $1.0   $2.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Defined

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Currency

 

 

Benefit

 

 

Derivative

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

Plans

 

 

Agreements

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Balance December 31, 2011

 

$

17.2

 

 

$

(15.3

)

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

2.9

 

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

(6.8

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(2.1

)

Tax benefit (expense)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

1.7

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.4

)

Balance December 31, 2012

 

$

22.8

 

 

$

(20.5

)

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

2.5

 

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

 

 

(10.1

)

 

 

11.2

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

0.3

 

Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of

   income(a)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

Tax benefit (expense)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(3.7

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(3.6

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(10.1

)

 

 

7.5

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(2.3

)

Balance December 31, 2013

 

$

12.7

 

 

$

(13.0

)

 

$

0.5

 

 

$

0.2

 

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

 

 

(29.1

)

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(37.6

)

Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of

   income(a)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Tax benefit (expense)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

3.3

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(29.1

)

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(34.9

)

Balance December 31, 2014

 

$

(16.4

)

 

$

(17.7

)

 

$

(0.6

)

 

$

(34.7

)

The 2010 change

(a)

Amounts classified to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses.

15.

Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

Commitments

a. Operating lease rent expense, included in comprehensive income relatedfrom operations, amounted to derivatives reflects $4.3 million ($2.6 million after tax) reclassified to$19.7, $20.9 and $20.7 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Beginning January 1, 2013, financing lease expense was recorded primarily for the Company’s Corporate Headquarters building.  In 2014, interest expense as a result of the termination of the Company’s interest rate collarassociated with this lease amounted to $4.2 and swap cash flow hedge agreements. The 2010 defined benefit plan adjustments include $14 million ($8.5 million after tax) reclassified to earnings as a result of the termination of the U.S. Pension Plan.

16. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

a. Rentdepreciation expense amounted to $18.2 million in 2011, $18.0 million in 2010$2.5.  

84


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and $20.5 million in 2009. per share data)

The Company is obligated to pay minimum annual rentals under non-cancelable long-termdifferent operating leases and capitalfinancing lease financing obligationsagreements as follows:

 

(In millions)

  Leases 

2012

  $24.1  

2013

   22.0  

2014

   18.2  

2015

   15.0  

2016

   11.8  

2017 and thereafter

   119.3  
  

 

 

 

Total future minimum lease commitments

  $210.4  
  

 

 

 

On July 20, 2011, the Company entered into a 20 year lease for a new corporate headquarters building that will be constructed in Ewing, New Jersey (approximately 10 miles from the Company’s existing corporate headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey) to meet office space needs for the foreseeable future. Based on current expectations that the facility will be completed and occupied beginning in early 2013, the lease will expire in 2033. The Company’s lease commitment is approximately $116 million over the lease term. In conjunction with its lease of the new headquarters building, the Company will be vacating three leased facilities adjacent to its current Princeton headquarters facility. Based on certain clauses in the lease, the Company is considered the owner, for financial statement reporting purposes, during the construction period, and recorded $17.4 million in construction in progress assets and a corresponding offset in other long-term liabilities.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

Operating

 

 

Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

 

Total

 

2015

 

$

19.7

 

 

$

5.8

 

 

$

25.5

 

2016

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

20.8

 

2017

 

 

12.2

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

18.0

 

2018

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

16.6

 

2019

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

15.6

 

2020 and thereafter

 

 

23.3

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

99.9

 

Total future minimum lease commitments

 

$

90.4

 

 

$

106.0

 

 

$

196.4

 

 

b. In December 1981, theThe Company formedhas a partnership with a supplier of raw materials that mines and processes sodium-based mineral deposits.  The Company purchases the majority of its sodium-based raw material requirements from the partnership. The partnership agreement for the partnership terminates upon two years’ written notice by either partner.  Under the partnership agreement, the Company has an annual commitment to purchase 240,000 tons of sodium-based raw materials at the prevailing market price.  TheWith the exception of the Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture, in which the Company and the partner supplier are each one-third owners, the Company is not engaged in any other material transactions with the partnership or the Company’s partner.partner supplier.

c. The Company’s distribution of condoms under the TROJAN and other trademarks is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Certain of the Company’s condoms, and similar condoms sold by our competitors, contain the spermicide nonoxynol-9 (“N-9”). Some interested groups have issued reports that N-9 should not be used rectally or for multiple daily acts of vaginal intercourse. In late 2008, the FDA issued final labeling guidance for latex condoms but excluded N-9 lubricated condoms from the guidance. While the Company awaits further FDA guidance on N-9 lubricated condoms, the Company believes that its present labeling for condoms with N-9 is compliant with the overall objectives of the FDA’s guidance, and that condoms with N-9 will remain a viable contraceptive choice for those couples who wish to use them. However, the Company cannot predict the nature of the labeling that ultimately will be required by the FDA. If the FDA or state governments eventually promulgate rules that prohibit or restrict the use of N-9 in condoms (such as new labeling requirements), the Company could incur costs from obsolete products, packaging or raw materials, and sales of condoms could decline, which, in turn, could decrease the Company’s operating income.

d. As of December 31, 2011,2014, the Company had commitments through 2014 to acquire2019 of approximately $130.6 million$238.5. These commitments include the purchase of raw materials, packaging supplies and services from its vendors at market prices. Increase in commitments from $118.8 million at December 31, 2010 is principally the result of a new four-year information systems service agreement. These commitmentsprices to enable the Company to respond quickly to changes in customer orders or requirements.requirements, as well as costs associated with licensing and promotion agreements.

e.d. As of December 31, 2011,2014, the Company had the following guarantees;guarantees: (i) $4.1 million$4.6 in outstanding letters of credit drawn on several banks which guarantee payment for such things as insurance claims in the event of the Company’s insolvency;insolvency, (ii) an insolvency protection guarantee of approximately $18.2 million to one of its United Kingdom pension plans effective January 1, 2011;2011, and (iii) $2.5 million$3.2 worth of assets insubject to guarantees for its Brazil operations for value added tax assessments and labor related cases currently under appeal; and (iv) guarantees of approximately $0.6 million for the payment of rent on a leased facility in Spain which expires in November 2012.appeal.  

f. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Unilever’s oral care brands in the United States and Canada in October 2003, the Company is required to make additional performance-based payments of a minimum of $5.0 million and a maximum of $12.0 million over the eight year period following the acquisition. The Company made cash payments of $0.5 million in 2011 which was accounted for as additional purchase price. The Company recorded the final performance-based payments in October 2011, and has paid $11.1 million over the eight years of this agreement.

g. On September 22, 2011, the Company, together with FMC Corporation and TATA Chemicals, formed an operating joint venture, Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”). The Company has a one-third ownership interest in Natronx, and its investment is accounted for under the equity method. The joint venture will engage in the manufacturing and marketing of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. The sorbents, primarily sodium bicarbonate and trona, are used by coal-fired utilities to remove harmful pollutants, such as acid gases, in flue-gas treatment processes. Natronx intends to invest approximately $60 million to construct a 450,000 ton per year facility in Wyoming to produce trona sorbents by the fourth quarter of 2012, the cost of which will be equally shared among all members. The joint venture started business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the Company made an initial investment of approximately $3 million and is committed to investing upwards of an additional $17 million in 2012.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

h.e. On November 8, 2011, the Company acquired a license for certain oral care technology for cash consideration of $4.3 million.$4.3.  In addition to this initial payment, the Company may beis required to make an advancedadvance royalty paymentpayments of up to $5.5 million upon the launch of a product utilizing the licensed technology, andof which $4.3 had been made as of December 31, 2014.  The Company is required to make an additional $7 million$7.0 license payment upon the approval of certain claimsNew Drug Applications by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Company paidAdministration for products incorporating the acquisition from available cash and will be managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.acquired technology.

i.Environmental matter

f. In 2000, the Company acquired majority ownership in its Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral Do Nordeste S.A. (“QGN”).  The acquired operations included an inorganic salt manufacturing plant which began site operations in the late 1970’s.  Located on the site were two closed landfills, two active landfills and a pond for the management of the process waste streams.  In 2009, QGN was advised by the environmental authoritiesauthority in the State of Bahia, the Institute of the Environment (“IMA”), that the plant was discharging contaminants into an adjacent creek.  After learning of the discharge, QGN took immediate action to cease the discharge and retained two nationally recognized environmental firms to prepare a site investigation / remedial action plan (“SI/RA”). report.  The SI/RA report was submitted by QGN to IMA in April 2010.  The report concluded that the likely sources of the discharge were the failure of the pond and closed landfills.  QGN ceased site operations in August 2010.  In November 2010, IMA responded to QGN’s recommendation for an additional study by issuing a notification requiring a broad range of remediation measures (the “Remediation Notification”), which included the shutdown and removal of two on-site landfills.  In addition, notwithstandingdespite repeated discussions with IMA at QGN’s request to consider QGN’s proposed remediation alternatives, in December 2010, IMA imposed a fine of five million realsBrazilian Real (approximately $3 million)U.S. $1.9 at current exchange rates) for the discharge of contaminants above allowable limits,limits.  The description of the fine included a reference to aggravating factors whichthat may indicate that local “management’s intent” was considered in determining the severity of the fine.fine, which could result in criminal liability for members of local management.  In January 2011, QGN filed with IMA an administrative defense to the fine.fine, suspending any enforcement activities pending its defense.  IMA has not yet formally responded to QGN’s administrative defense.

With respect to the Remediation Notification, QGN engaged in discussions with IMA during which QGN asserted that a number of the remediation measures, including the removal of the landfills, and the timeframes for implementation were not appropriate and

85


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

requested that the Remediation Notification be withdrawn.  In response, in February 2011, IMA issued a revised Remediation Notification (the “Revised Remediation Notification”) providing for further site analysis by QGN, including further study of the integrity of the landfills.  The revisedRevised Remediation NoticeNotification did not include a requirement to remove the landfills.landfills; however, it did not foreclose the possibility of such a requirement.  QGN has responded to the revisedRevised Remediation Notification providing further information regarding the remediation measures, and intends to continueis in discussions with the Institute of Environment and Waste Management (“INEMA”), successor to IMA, to seek agreement on an appropriate remediation plan.  In mid 2011,mid-2011, QGN, consistent with the revisedRevised Remediation Notice, began an additional site investigation and capped the two active landfills with an impervious synthetic coverlandfills.  In 2012, QGN drained the waste pond.  During the third quarter of 2013, INEMA approved the first step in QGN’s proposed remediation plans, the installation of a trench drain to capture and initiatedtreat groundwater at the closuresite.  Construction of the pond. However, discussions are continuingtrench drain began during the first quarter of 2014 and is expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter 2015.  In June 2014, QGN formally submitted to INEMA a technical report, including a remediation plan for the site and a proposed agreement regarding the fine and QGN’s ongoing obligations at the site.  In July 2014, an initial meeting was held with INEMA concerningto review and discuss the potential removal ofreport and the landfills.proposed agreement.  Following the initial meeting, QGN provided additional information requested by INEMA and continues to engage in discussions with INEMA regarding the proposed agreement.

As a result of the foregoing events, the Company accrued approximately $3 million$3.0 in 2009 and an additional $4.8 million in 2010 for remediation, fines and related costs.  Since 2009, the costs of remediation activities and foreign exchange rate changes have reduced the accrual by approximately $4.7 to a current amount of $3.1.  As a result of December 31, 2011, $1.7 million has been spent on the remediation activities. If INEMA requires the removalINEMA’s approval of the landfills and, iffirst step in QGN’s remediation plans, the Company isdoes not believe that QGN will be required to remove the landfills.  However, it remains reasonably possible that INEMA will require such removal, and the Company could be unsuccessful in appealing such decision,decision.  The Company estimates the cost could haveof such landfill removal to be in the range of $30 to $50.

Legal and tax proceedings

g. The Company has recorded liabilities for uncertain income tax positions that, although supportable, may be challenged by tax authorities.  The Company’s liabilities for uncertain income tax positions are $4.0 as of December 31, 2014.  The Company does not expect a material adverse effect onchange in the liabilities for uncertain income tax positions within the next twelve months.

h. In addition, in conjunction with the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operationsacquisition and cash flow.

j. In June 2009,divestiture activities, the Company received a subpoenaentered into select guarantees and civil investigative demand from the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in connection with a non-public investigation in which the FTC is seeking to determine if the Company has engaged or is engaging in any unfair methodsindemnifications of competitionperformance with respect to the distributionfulfillment of the Company’s commitments under applicable purchase and sale agreements.  The arrangements generally indemnify the buyer or seller for damages associated with breach of condomscontract, inaccuracies in representations and warranties surviving the United States through potentially exclusionary practices. The Company believesclosing date and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments retained under the applicable contract.  Representations and warranties that its distribution and sales practices involvingsurvive the closing date generally survive for periods up to five years or the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations.  Potential losses under the indemnifications are generally limited to a portion of the original transaction price, or to other lesser specific dollar amounts for select provisions.  With respect to sale of condoms are in full compliance with applicable law.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The FTC investigation arose out of allegations raised by Mayer Laboratories, Inc. (“Mayer Labs”), a California based condom business competitor whose principal brand of condoms has a U.S. market share of less than one percent. On November 21, 2008, following the Company’s receipt of correspondence from counsel for Mayer Labs threatening litigation related to the Company’s condom sales and marketing practices,transactions, the Company commenced a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Courtalso routinely enters into non-competition agreements for the Districtvarying periods of New Jersey seeking a ruling that the Company’s condom salestime.  Guarantees and marketing practices are legal. The case subsequently was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

In the litigation, Mayer Labs alleges, among other things, that the Company’s long standing shelf space program under which a retail store chain allocates a percentage of shelf space to the Company’s products in exchange for price rebates, other sales and marketing practices through which the Company allegedly attempted to influence the brand mix and shelf placement of condoms in certain retail stores, and other alleged anti-competitive activities violated federal and state antitrust laws, and that the Company tortuously interfered with an alleged exclusive business arrangement between Mayer Labs and its supplier. Mayer Labs generally seeks an order declaring the Company’s sales and marketing practices related to shelf space allocation for condoms to be illegal, monetary damages and trebling of certain of the damages, disgorgement of profits, injunctive relief, and recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

On January 6, 2012, Mayer Labs’ served an expert’s report indicating that it is seeking damages of between $2.6 million and $3.1 million and trebling of those damages. At this point, it is not possible to estimate the amount of any additional alleged damage claims Mayer Labs may make.

On the same date, the Company filed a motion for summary judgmentindemnifications with respect to Mayer Labs’ claims, which was argued before the courtacquisition and divestiture activities, if triggered, could have a materially adverse impact on February 10, 2012. If the Company’s motion for summary judgment is denied, the matter is scheduled to proceed to trial on April 2, 2012.financial condition and results of operations.

Mayer Labs filed a motion for sanctions on February 7, 2012, against the Company, which the Company believes are unjustified and is vigorously contesting.i. The motion is based on the deletion of emails allegedly relevant to the litigation by James R. Craigie, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and the claim that the Company allegedly failed to make a reasonable and good faith effort to recover certain of the deleted emails. Although the Company believes that it has been able to retrieve substantially all of the deleted emails, the sanctions sought by Mayer Labs include the dismissal of the Company’s claims against Mayer Labs; a default judgment against the Company with respect to Mayer Labs’ claims against the Company or, alternatively, an adverse inference that the deleted documents would have supported Mayer’s claims; an instruction that the Company notify parties opposing the Company, in the ordinary course of its business is the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, government investigations and proceedings from time to time, including, without limitation, those relating to, commercial transactions, product liability, purported consumer class actions, employment matters, antitrust, environmental, health, safety and other previous and pending lawsuits if the Company has violated its obligation to preserve documentscompliance related to those lawsuits; preclusion of the Company from introducing any email evidence to or from its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and payment of attorneys fees.

As noted above with respect to the FTC investigation and the Mayer Labs litigation, the Company believes that its condom sales and marketing practices are in full compliance with applicable law. Moreover, the Company intends to vigorously defend against Mayer Labs’ allegations. However, these mattersmatters.  Such proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of investigationscertain pending or threatened legal actions may not be reasonably predictable and litigation matters isany related damages may not predictable with assurance. An adverse outcomebe estimable.  Certain legal actions, including those described above, could result in any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, an adverse outcome with regard to Mayer Labs’ motion for sanctions could have a material adverse effect on the outcome of the FTC investigation and the Mayer Labs litigation, and might adversely affect the Company, with regard to other litigation.

k. The Company is engaged in disputes with SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH (“SPD”), primarily regarding each company’s advertising claims for home pregnancy and ovulation test kits. On January 22, 2009,

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SPD filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey was granted in April 2009. On January 15, 2010, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory relief against SPD, also in the New Jersey District Court, and in response SPD filed counterclaims against the Company. Each company’s initial and subsequent claims against the other have been consolidated before that Court. The parties are currently in discovery. No trial date has been set.

Essentially, SPD alleges that the Company uses false and misleading advertising and competes unfairly with respect to its FIRST RESPONSE digital and analog home pregnancy and analog ovulation test kits in violation of the Lanham Act and related state laws. SPD’s allegations are principally directed to claims included in advertising to the effect that the Company’s digital FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kits can detect the pregnancy hormone five days before a woman’s missed menstrual period and that its analog FIRST RESPONSE Early Result Pregnancy Test (the “6-Day Product”) detects the pregnancy hormone six days before a woman’s missed menstrual period. SPD seeks an order to enjoin the Company from making those claims and to remove allany such advertising from the marketplace, unspecified damages, trebling of those damages, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

The Company has denied all of SPD’s allegations and has asserted that the Food and Drug Administration has cleared the FIRST RESPONSE digital pregnancy test and analog pregnancy test for use 5 and 6 days, respectively, before a woman’s missed menstrual period. In addition, the Company asserts claims of false and misleading advertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and related state laws with respect to certain of SPD’s advertising claims for its ClearBlue Easy home pregnancy test kit and ovulation detection products. The Company seeks an order to enjoin SPD from making those claims and to remove all such advertising from the marketplace, unspecified damages, enhancement of those damages, costs of the action and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Company also seeks a judicial declaration that certain statements on the package for the 6-Day Product (namely, the statement that the 6-Day Product can detect the pregnancy hormone up to six days before a woman’s missed period and the statement that, in clinical testing, the 6-Day Product detected pregnancy in 68% of the tested urine samples of pregnant women taken six days before the date of missed period), as well as substantively identical advertising statements that the Company intended to publish in other media, are not actionable. In response, SPD denied all of the Company’s allegations and asserted counterclaims with respect to the 6-Day Product summarized above.

The Company intends to vigorously pursue its claims and defenses against SPD. However, this matter is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of litigation is not predictable with assurance. An adverse outcome in this matter could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

l. The Company has recorded liabilities for uncertain income tax positions that, although supportable, may be challenged by the tax authorities. The Company closed the audit of tax years 2008 and 2009 with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service on February 6, 2012. The tax years 2008 and 2009 are currently under audit by several state and international taxing authorities. In addition, certain statutes of limitation are scheduled to expire in the near future. It is reasonably possible that within the next twelve months the liabilities for uncertain tax positions may decrease by approximately $6.8 million related to the settlement of these audits or the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. Of this amount, $0.6 million would be offset by a corresponding reduction in the amount of deferred tax assets on the balance sheet.

m. The Company, in the ordinary course of its business, is the subject of, or a party to, various other pending or threatened legal actions. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of individual litigated86


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

17. Litigation Settlements

In April 2005, the Company filed suit against Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (“Abbott”) claiming infringement of certain patents resulting from Abbott’s manufacture and sale of its Fact Plus pregnancy diagnostic test kits. In a separate action commenced in July 2007, Abbott sued the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for infringement of certain patents for which Abbott was an exclusive licensee. On September 17, 2009, the Company and Abbott agreed to settle the litigation and, as part of the settlement, Abbott paid $27 million to the Company on October 2, 2009, after which the New Jersey and Illinois actions were both dismissed with prejudice. The Company recognized a gain, net of legal expenses, of $20.0 million as of September 2009, which is reflected in the results of the Consumer Domestic segment.

18. Related Party Transactions

16.

Related Party Transactions

The following summarizes the balances and transactions between the Company and (i) each of (i) Armand and ArmaKleen, in which the Company holdholds a 50% ownership interest, and (ii) Natronx, in which the Company holds a one-third ownership interest:

 

 

Armand

 

 

ArmaKleen

 

 

Natronx

 

  Armand   ArmaKleen   Natronx 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

    2011       2010       2009       2011       2010       2009       2011       2010       2009   

Purchases by Company

  $19.6    $13.8    $9.9    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0  

 

$

26.4

 

 

$

22.5

 

 

$

21.3

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Sales by Company

  $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $5.5    $5.5    $4.9    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0  

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

5.5

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

2.4

 

Outstanding Accounts Receivable

  $0.3    $0.3    $0.0    $0.7    $0.5    $0.5    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0  

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.8

 

 

$

0.8

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.0

 

Outstanding Accounts Payable

  $2.3    $0.9    $2.3    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0    $0.0  

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Administration & Management Oversight Services(1)

  $1.7    $1.7    $1.7    $2.5    $2.5    $2.7    $0.7    $0.0    $0.0  

Administration & Management Oversight

Services (1)

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

0.8

 

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

(1)

Billed by Company and recorded as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses.

On September 22, 2011, the Company, together with FMC Corporation and TATA Chemicals, formed Natronx, an air pollution control joint venture. The Company hasrecorded a one-third ownership$3.2 impairment charge associated with one of its affiliates in 2013.  The charge, recorded in Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates, is a result of the joint venture andCompany’s assessment of the investment is accounted for underfinancial impact from the equity method. All members share equallydelay in the operating results andanticipated discounted cash flows offrom the business. Each member has an equal amount of board of director positions and no member has the ability to direct the activities of the venture. The joint venture will engage in the manufacturing and marketing of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. Natronx intends to invest approximately $60 million to construct a 450,000 ton per year facility in Wyoming to produce trona sorbents by the fourth quarter of 2012. The joint venture started business in the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company made an initial investment of $3.2 million and has committed to investing upwards of an additional $17 million to the joint venture.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

affiliate.

 

19. Segments

17.

Segments

Segment Information

The Company operates three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products Division (“SPD”).Division.  These segments are determined based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership structures.  The Company also has a Corporate segment.

Segment revenues are derived from the sale of the following products:

 

Segment

Products

SegmentConsumer Domestic

Products

Consumer DomesticHousehold and personal care products

Consumer International

Primarily personal care products

SPD

SPD

Specialty chemical products

The Corporate segment income consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates.  TheAs of December 31, 2014, the Company hadheld 50% ownership interests in each of Armand and ArmaKleen, as of December 31, 2011.respectively, and a one-third ownership interest in Natronx.  The Company’s equity in earnings (losses) of Armand, ArmaKleen and ArmaKleenNatronx for the twelve months ended December 31 2011, 2010, 2014, 2013 and 2009 is included in the Corporate segment. On September 22, 2011, the Company formed an operating joint venture, Natronx, in which it has a one-third ownership interest. The Company’s equity in Natronx’s net loss for the period ended December 31, 2011 is also2012 are included in the Corporate segment.

Some of the subsidiaries that are included in the Consumer International segment manufacture and sell personal care products to the Consumer Domestic segment.  These sales are eliminated from the Consumer International segment results set forth in the table below.

87


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

The following table presents selected financial information relating to the Company’s segments for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011.2014:

 

(In millions)

  Consumer
Domestic
   Consumer
International
   SPD   Corporate(1)  As Reported 

Net sales

         

2011

  $1,979.1    $509.1    $261.1    $0.0   $2,749.3  

2010

   1,886.1     444.0     259.1     0.0    2,589.2  

2009

   1,881.7     393.7     245.5     0.0    2,520.9  

Gross profit

         

2011

   936.9     238.7     64.2     (25.3  1,214.5  

2010

   913.2     211.9     59.3     (26.6  1,157.8  

2009

   890.8     183.7     58.3     (31.8  1,101.0  

Marketing Expenses

         

2011

   274.9     75.9     3.3     0.0    354.1  

2010

   265.6     69.8     2.6     0.0    338.0  

2009

   287.0     64.3     2.3     0.0    353.6  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

         

2011

   269.5     92.8     30.8     (25.3  367.8  

2010

   279.5     85.5     36.4     (26.6  374.8  

2009

   270.1     77.5     38.7     (31.8  354.5  

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

International

 

 

SPD

 

 

Corporate(1)

 

 

As Reported

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

2,471.6

 

 

$

535.2

 

 

$

290.8

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

3,297.6

 

2013

 

 

2,413.5

 

 

 

532.8

 

 

 

248.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

3,194.3

 

2012

 

 

2,156.9

 

 

 

510.1

 

 

 

254.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2,921.9

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

1,160.9

 

 

 

242.1

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

(26.7

)

 

 

1,452.9

 

2013

 

 

1,163.0

 

 

 

243.0

 

 

 

63.3

 

 

 

(31.3

)

 

 

1,438.0

 

2012

 

 

1,015.9

 

 

 

236.9

 

 

 

68.0

 

 

 

(29.4

)

 

 

1,291.4

 

Marketing Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

333.2

 

 

 

80.5

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

416.9

 

2013

 

 

320.5

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

399.8

 

2012

 

 

280.3

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

357.3

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

302.0

 

 

 

93.9

 

 

 

25.6

 

 

 

(26.7

)

 

 

394.8

 

2013

 

 

318.6

 

 

 

98.8

 

 

 

29.9

 

 

 

(31.3

)

 

 

416.0

 

2012

 

 

297.6

 

 

 

89.8

 

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

(29.4

)

 

 

389.0

 

Income from Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

525.7

 

 

 

67.6

 

 

 

47.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

641.2

 

2013

 

 

524.0

 

 

 

67.4

 

 

 

30.8

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

622.2

 

2012

 

 

438.0

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

34.5

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

545.1

 

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

11.6

 

2013

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

2.8

 

2012

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

8.9

 

Interest Expense(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

22.5

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

27.4

 

2013

 

 

23.4

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

27.7

 

2012

 

 

11.2

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

14.0

 

Investment Earnings(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2.3

 

2013

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

2.6

 

2012

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

1.7

 

Other Income (Expense), net(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.8

)

2013

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

(2.1

)

2012

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

0.8

 

Income Before Income Taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

502.8

 

 

 

64.7

 

 

 

45.8

 

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

624.9

 

2013

 

 

501.0

 

 

 

64.5

 

 

 

29.5

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

597.8

 

2012

 

 

428.8

 

 

 

71.0

 

 

 

33.8

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

542.5

 

Identifiable Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

3,502.9

 

 

 

619.8

 

 

 

135.1

 

 

 

123.5

 

 

 

4,381.3

 

2013

 

 

3,407.4

 

 

 

602.5

 

 

 

140.6

 

 

 

109.2

 

 

 

4,259.7

 

2012

 

 

3,317.5

 

 

 

543.8

 

 

 

135.1

 

 

 

101.7

 

 

 

4,098.1

 

Capital Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

59.2

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

70.5

 

2013

 

 

53.6

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

67.1

 

2012

 

 

58.9

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

74.5

 

88


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

(In millions)

  Consumer
Domestic
  Consumer
International
  SPD  Corporate(1)   As Reported 

Patent Litigation Settlement, net

       

2011

   0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0     0.0  

2010

   0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0     0.0  

2009

   (20.0  0.0    0.0    0.0     (20.0

Income from Operations

       

2011

   392.5    70.0    30.1    0.0     492.6  

2010

   368.1    56.6    20.3    0.0     445.0  

2009

   353.6    41.9    17.4    0.0     412.9  

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

       

2011

   0.0    0.0    0.0    10.0     10.0  

2010

   0.0    0.0    0.0    5.0     5.0  

2009

   0.0    0.0    0.0    12.1     12.1  

Interest Expense(2)

       

2011

   7.0    1.2    0.5    0.0     8.7  

2010

   23.0    3.5    1.3    0.0     27.8  

2009

   30.5    3.6    1.5    0.0     35.6  

Investment Earnings(2)

       

2011

   1.5    0.3    0.1    0.0     1.9  

2010

   0.5    0.1    0.0    0.0     0.6  

2009

   1.1    0.1    0.1    0.0     1.3  

Other Income & Expense(2)

       

2011

   (1.0  (0.2  0.0    0.0     (1.2

2010

   (3.7  (0.6  (0.2  0.0     (4.5

2009

   1.3    0.1    0.1    0.0     1.5  

Income Before Income Taxes

       

2011

   386.0    68.9    29.7    10.0     494.6  

2010

   341.9    52.6    18.8    5.0     418.3  

2009

   325.6    38.6    16.0    12.0     392.2  

Identifiable Assets

       

2011

   2,437.9    476.5    132.2    71.0     3,117.6  

2010

   2,386.2    330.6    147.8    80.6     2,945.2  

2009

   2,494.9    350.0    179.5    94.0     3,118.4  

Capital Expenditures

       

2011

   57.4    12.2    7.0    0.0     76.6  

2010

   54.7    6.1    3.0    0.0     63.8  

2009

   125.2    4.6    5.6    0.0     135.4  

Depreciation & Amortization

       

2011

   61.4    8.1    5.7    1.9     77.1  

2010

   53.3    8.5    6.2    3.6     71.6  

2009

   67.9    7.0    6.5    4.0     85.4  

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

International

 

 

SPD

 

 

Corporate(1)

 

 

As Reported

 

Depreciation & Amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

76.7

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

91.2

 

2013

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

6.1

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

90.5

 

2012

 

 

70.5

 

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

85.0

 

 

(1)

The Corporate segment reflects the following:

(A)

(A)

The administrative costs of the production planning and logistics functions are included in segment Selling, General and Administrative expenses but are elements of Cost of Sales in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.  Such amounts were $25.3 million, $26.6 million,$26.7, $31.3, and $31.8 million$29.4 for 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(B)

(B)

Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates from Armand, Armakleen and Natronx.

(C)

(C)

Corporate assets include notes receivable, domestic deferred income taxes, deferred compensation investments and the Company’sCompany's investment in unconsolidated affiliates.

(2)

In determining Income before Income Taxes, interest expense, investment earnings, and other income, (expense)net, were allocated to the segments based upon each segment’ssegment's relative operating profit.Income from Operations.

Other than the differences noted in footnotesfootnote (1) and(2) above, the accounting policies followed by each of the segments, including intersegment transactions, are substantially consistent with the accounting policies set forthdescribed in Note 1.

Intersegment sales from Consumer International to Consumer Domestic, which are not reflected in the table above, were $5.2 million, $3.6 million$1.9, $2.2 and $3.0 million$3.4 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011,2014, December 31, 20102013 and December 31, 2009,2012, respectively.

Product line revenues from external customers for each of the three years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In millions)

  2011   2010   2009 

Household Products

  $1,295.0    $1,207.4    $1,196.4  

 

$

1,466.2

 

 

$

1,436.1

 

 

$

1,411.3

 

Personal Care Products

   684.1     678.7     685.3  

 

 

1,005.4

 

 

 

977.4

 

 

 

745.6

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Consumer Domestic

   1,979.1     1,886.1     1,881.7  

 

 

2,471.6

 

 

 

2,413.5

 

 

 

2,156.9

 

Total Consumer International

   509.1     444.0     393.7  

 

 

535.2

 

 

 

532.8

 

 

 

510.1

 

Total SPD

   261.1     259.1     245.5  

 

 

290.8

 

 

 

248.0

 

 

 

254.9

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Consolidated Net Sales

  $2,749.3    $2,589.2    $2,520.9  

 

$

3,297.6

 

 

$

3,194.3

 

 

$

2,921.9

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Household Products include laundry, deodorizing, cleaning and laundrycleaning products. Personal Care Products include condoms, pregnancy kits, oral care products, and skin care products.products and gummy dietary supplements.

Geographic Information

Approximately 79%81%, 79%80% and 81%79% of the net sales reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively, were to customers in the United States.U.S.  Approximately 96%, 96%97% and 95%97% of long-lived assets were located in the U.S. at December 31, 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively.  Other than the United States,U.S., no one country accounts for more than 7%6% of consolidated net sales and 3%5% of total assets.

Customers

A group of three customers accounted for approximately 33%36%, 35% and 34%  of consolidated net sales in 2011,2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which a single customer (Wal-Mart Stores, IncInc. and its affiliates) accounted for approximately 23%. A group of three customers accounted for approximately 33% of consolidated net sales25%, 24% and 24% in 2010, of which Wal-Mart2014, 2013 and its affiliates accounted for approximately 23%. A group of three customers accounted for approximately 32% of consolidated net sales in 2009 of which Wal-Mart and its affiliates accounted for approximately 22%.2012, respectively.

89


CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

18.  Subsequent Events

Share Repurchase

As part of the Company’s evergreen share repurchase program, in early January 2015, the Company purchased 0.5 million shares of Common Stock at a cost of approximately $41.2.  The Company used cash on hand to fund the purchase price.  

On January 28, 2015, the Board authorized the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.  The 2015 Share Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s 2014 Share Repurchase Program and the Unaudited Quarterly Financial InformationCompany continued its evergreen share repurchase program.  

As part of the 2015 Share Repurchase Program and the evergreen share repurchase program, in early February 2015, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase contract with a commercial bank to purchase $215.0 of Common Stock.  The Company paid $215.0 to the bank and received an initial delivery of approximately 2.6 million shares of Common Stock.  The contract will be settled by mid-May.  However, if the Company is required to deliver value to the commercial bank at the end of the purchase period, the Company, at its option, may elect to settle in shares of Common Stock or cash.  

Of the 2015 share repurchases, approximately $88.0 was purchased under the Company’s evergreen share repurchase program.  

VI-COR acquisition

On January 2, 2015, the Company acquired the assets of Varied Industries Corporation (“VI-COR Acquisition”), a manufacturer and seller of feed ingredients for cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock.  The total purchase price was approximately $75, which is subject to adjustment based on the closing working capital of VI-COR, and a $5.0 payment after one year if certain operating performance is achieved.  The Company financed the acquisition with available cash.  VI-COR’s annual sales are approximately $25.  These brands will be managed within the Specialty Products segment.

19.

Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information

The unaudited quarterly results of operations are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented.  Adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature, except as discussed in the accompanying notes.  Due to rounding differences, the sum of the quarterly amounts may not add precisely to the annual amounts.

 

(in millions, except per share data)

  First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Full
Year
 

2011

          

Net Sales

  $642.3    $674.9    $701.0    $731.1    $2,749.3  

Gross Profit

   288.1     300.0     309.9     316.5     1,214.5  

Income from Operations

   131.1     117.8     126.3     117.4     492.6  

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

   2.2     3.2     2.9     1.7     10.0  

Net Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

   83.6     82.6     79.6     63.8     309.6  

Net Income per Share-Basic

  $0.59    $0.58    $0.55    $0.45    $2.16  

Net Income per Share-Diluted

  $0.58    $0.57    $0.54    $0.44    $2.12  

2010

          

Net Sales

  $634.5    $640.9    $656.9    $656.9    $2,589.2  

Gross Profit

   285.5     290.9     289.0     292.4     1,157.8  

Income from Operations

   132.0     120.0     113.0     80.0     445.0  

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

   1.2     1.6     0.8     1.4     5.0  

Net Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

   80.0     74.2     69.5     47.0     270.7  

Net Income per Share-Basic

  $0.57    $0.53    $0.49    $0.33    $1.91  

Net Income per Share-Diluted

  $0.56    $0.52    $0.48    $0.33    $1.87  

2009

          

Net Sales

  $580.9    $623.1    $646.1    $670.8    $2,520.9  

Gross Profit

   249.3     281.6     284.9     285.2     1,101.0  

Income from Operations

   104.7     99.0     117.9     91.3     412.9  

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

   2.7     4.0     2.7     2.7     12.1  

Net Income attributable to Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

   62.5     58.2     70.0     52.8     243.5  

Net Income per Share-Basic

  $0.45    $0.42    $0.50    $0.38    $1.73  

Net Income per Share-Diluted

  $0.44    $0.41    $0.49    $0.37    $1.71  

The fourth quarter of 2011 includes a deferred tax valuation charge of approximately $13 million (or $0.09 per share) and includes an additional month’s results of three foreign subsidiaries due to the change in the fiscal calendar. The change increased net sales by $14.3 million, but had a nominal effect on net income.

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Full

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Year

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

$

782.0

 

 

$

808.3

 

 

$

841.8

 

 

$

865.5

 

 

$

3,297.6

 

Gross Profit

 

 

339.4

 

 

 

356.4

 

 

 

367.5

 

 

 

389.6

 

 

 

1,452.9

 

Income from Operations(1)

 

 

162.0

 

 

 

138.2

 

 

 

177.2

 

 

 

163.8

 

 

 

641.2

 

Net Income

 

 

102.6

 

 

 

88.8

 

 

 

115.9

 

 

 

106.6

 

 

 

413.9

 

Net Income per Share-Basic

 

$

0.74

 

 

$

0.66

 

 

$

0.87

 

 

$

0.80

 

 

$

3.06

 

Net Income per Share-Diluted

 

$

0.73

 

 

$

0.65

 

 

$

0.85

 

 

$

0.78

 

 

$

3.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

$

779.3

 

 

$

787.6

 

 

$

804.8

 

 

$

822.6

 

 

$

3,194.3

 

Gross Profit

 

 

350.1

 

 

 

351.0

 

 

 

365.2

 

 

 

371.7

 

 

 

1,438.0

 

Income from Operations(2)

 

 

169.3

 

 

 

140.5

 

 

 

167.8

 

 

 

144.6

 

 

 

622.2

 

Net Income

 

 

107.7

 

 

 

86.6

 

 

 

107.9

 

 

 

92.2

 

 

 

394.4

 

Net Income per Share-Basic

 

$

0.78

 

 

$

0.62

 

 

$

0.78

 

 

$

0.66

 

 

$

2.85

 

Net Income per Share-Diluted

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.61

 

 

$

0.76

 

 

$

0.65

 

 

$

2.79

 

(1)

The second quarter of 2014 Income from Operations includes $5.0 of intangible asset impairment charges.

(2)

The fourth quarter of 2013 Income from Operations includes approximately $6.5 of trade name impairment charges.


ITEM 9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.  

 

The fourth quarter of 2010 includes a pension settlement charge of approximately $24 million pre-tax ($15.5 million after tax).

In the third and fourth quarters of 2009, the Company recorded fixed asset impairment charges of $4.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, relating to the carrying value of assets associated with one of its international subsidiaries. These charges are associated with products that compete with imports priced in U.S. dollars. As the dollar has weakened, it has been necessary to lower prices in the local currency to stay competitive, leading to negative cash flows.

In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $20 million, net of expenses, related to the patent infringement legal settlement with Abbott.

In connection with the shutdown of its North Brunswick, New Jersey facility, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation charges of approximately $4 million in each of the four quarters of 2009, and in the fourth quarter also recorded a $7.2 million charge associated with operating leases no longer in use.

ITEM 9.ITEM 9A.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act:”Act”)) at the end of the period covered by this report.Annual Report.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportAnnual Report are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act are (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’sCommission’s  rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the disclosure.

b)Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

OurThe Company’s management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-KAnnual Report and is incorporated by reference herein.  OurThe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

c)Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEMITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

 


PART III

ITEMITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance—Governance – Code of Conduct,” and “Corporate Governance—Governance – Board of Directors Meetings and Board Committees—Committees – Audit Committee,” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this report.Annual Report.

 

ITEMITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2011“2014 Summary Compensation Table,” “2011“2014 Grants of Plan Based Awards,” “2011“2014 Outstanding Equity Awards at Year end,Fiscal Year-End,“2011“2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “2011“2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” and “Compensation & Organization Committee Report” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this report.Annual Report.

 

ITEMITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2011”2014” and “Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this report.Annual Report.

 

ITEMITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Corporate Governance—Governance – Board Independence” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this report.Annual Report.

 

ITEMITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Annual Report.


PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS,FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)  1.Financial Statements and Schedule

The following Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K:

 

(a)  3.Exhibits

Unless otherwise noted, the file number for all Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission referenced below is 1-10585.

 

(3.1)

(3.1)

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2009.

(3.2)

(3.2)

By-laws of the Company, amended and restated as of February 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2012.

(4.1)

(4.1)

Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2010, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010.

(4.2)

(4.2)

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2010, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to the 3.35% senior notes due 2015 (including form of note), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010.

(4.3)

(10.1)Purchase and Sale Agreement,

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated January 16, 2003, by andas of September 26, 2012, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Harrison Street Funding LLC.The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to the 2.875% Notes due 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2003.September 26, 2012.

(4.4)

(10.2)Receivables Purchase Agreement,

Indenture, dated January 16, 2003, by andas of December 9, 2014, between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNCWells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.24.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2003.December 9, 2014.

(4.5)

(10.2.1)

First Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement,Supplemental Indenture, dated September 26, 2003, by andas of December 9, 2014, between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNCWells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2.450% Notes due 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c)4.2 to the Company’s annualcurrent report on Form 10-K for the year ended8-K filed on December 31, 2005.

9, 2014.

(10.2.2)Second Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated July 20, 2004, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

(10.1)

(10.2.3)Third Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(10.2.4)Fourth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(10.2.5)Fifth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated April 10, 2007, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(10.2.6)Sixth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated February 17, 2009, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(10.2.7)Seventh Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated February 16, 2010, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
(10.2.8)Eighth Amendment to the Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated February 15, 2011, by and between Harrison Street Funding, LLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
(10.3)

Credit Agreement, dated November 18, 2010, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, HSBC Bank USA, National Association and Union Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2010.

(10.1.1)

(10.4)Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June 1, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
*(10.4.1)Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2007.
*(10.4.2)Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective February 1, 2012.
*(10.5)Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan II, amended and restated as of January 1, 2012.
*(10.6)Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors effective as of May 1, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2008.

*(10.7)The Stock Option Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 1991, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
*(10.8)Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
*(10.9)The Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stock Award Plan as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2007.
*(10.10)Employment Agreement, dated June 11, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and James R. Craigie incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10(s) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
*(10.11)Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2002, by and between Armkel, LLC and Adrian Huns incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10(u) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
*(10.12)Employment Agreement, dated January 3, 2002, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Joseph A. Sipia, Jr., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
*(10.13)Employment Agreement, dated July 16, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Louis H. Tursi, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
*(10.14)Employment Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, by and between the Company and Matthew T. Farrell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2006.
*(10.15)Form of Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and each of the Company’s executive officers, with the exception of James R. Craigie and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
*(10.16)Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and James R. Craigie, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(x) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
*(10.17)Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated December 31, 2011, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Patrick de Maynadier.
*(10.18)Employment Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and between the Company and Patrick de Maynadier.
*(10.19)Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed on March 28, 2008.
(10.20)Lease Agreement (Build to Suit), dated July 20, 2011, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and CD 95 L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

(10.21)Amendment No.  1 to Credit Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, HSBC Bank USA, National Association and Union Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.


(10.1.2)

Credit Agreement, dated December 19, 2014, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., the initial lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender, and L/C issuer, SunTrust Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as syndication agents and swing line lenders, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Santander Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD, as Documentation Agents, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2014.

(10.22)

(10.2)

Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated October 3, 2011, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Dealer.Dealer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  

(10.3)

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Avid Health, Inc., the Seller Representative and the sellers party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2012.

(12)

*

(10.4)

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June 1, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.  

*

(10.4.1)

Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

*

(10.4.2)

Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective February 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

*

(10.5)

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan II, amended and restated as of January 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  

*

(10.6)

Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors effective as of May 1, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2008.

*

(10.7)

Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for Directors, effective January 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

*

(10.8)

The Stock Option Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 1991, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

*

(10.9)

The Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stock Award Plan as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2007.

*

(10.10)

Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed on March 21, 2013.

*

(10.11)

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Annual Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed on March 23, 2012.

*

(10.12)

Employment Agreement, dated June 11, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and James R. Craigie incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

*

(10.13)

Employment Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and between the Company and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

*

(10.14)

Employment Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, by and between the Company and Matthew T. Farrell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2006.

*

(10.15)

Employment Agreement, dated July 16, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Louis H. Tursi, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.


*

(10.16)

Form of Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and each of the Company’s executive officers, with the exception of James R. Craigie and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

*

(10.17)

Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and James R. Craigie, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

*

(10.18)

Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated December 31, 2011, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

(10.19)

Lease Agreement (Build to Suit), dated July 20, 2011, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and CD 95 L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

·

(12)

Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges.

·

(21)

(18)Deloitte & Touche LLP preferability letter related to elimination of reporting lag for certain subsidiaries.
(21)

List of the Company’s subsidiaries.

·

(23.1)

(23.1)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

·

(31.1)

(31.1)

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the   Securities Exchange Act.

·

(31.2)

(31.2)

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act.

·

(32.1)

(32.1)

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350.

·

(32.2)

(32.2)

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350.

(101)

(101)

The following materials from Church & Dwight Co., Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011,2014, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2010,2013, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011,2014, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20112014 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

___________

Indicates documents filed herewith.
*

·

Indicates documents filed herewith.

*

Constitutes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.Annual Report.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this reportAnnual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 24, 2012.20, 2015.

 

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.

By:

/s/     JAMES R. CRAIGIE        

By:

/s/ James R. Craigie

JAMES R. CRAIGIE

CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this reportAnnual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

/s/ T.  Rosie Albright

Director

February 20, 2015

/s/    T. ROSIE ALBRIGHT        

T.  Rosie Albright

Director

February 24, 2012

/s/    JOSE B. ALVAREZ        

Jose B. Alvarez

Director

February 24, 2012

/s/ JAMES R. CRAIGIE        

James R. Craigie

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

/s/    ROSINA B. DIXON        

Rosina B. DixonJames R. Craigie

Director

February 24, 2012

/s/ BRADLEY C. IRWIN        

Bradley C. Irwin

Director

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

Bradley C. Irwin

/s/ ROBERT D. LEBLANC        

Robert D. LeBlanc

Director

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

Robert D. LeBlanc

/s/ PENRY W. PRICE        

Penry W. Price

Director

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

/s/    RAVI K. SALIGRAM        

Ravi K. SaligramPenry W. Price

Director

February 24, 2012

/s/ ROBERTRavichandra K. SHEARER        Saligram

Director

February 20, 2015

Ravichandra K. Saligram

/s/ Robert K. Shearer

Director

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

Robert K. Shearer

/s/ ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK        Janet S. Vergis

Director

February 20, 2015

Janet S. Vergis

/s/ Arthur B. Winkleblack

Director

February 24, 2012

20, 2015

Arthur B. Winkleblack

/s/ MATTHEW T. FARRELL

Matthew T. Farrell

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating

February 20, 2015

Matthew T. Farrell

Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

February 24, 2012

/s/ STEVEN J. KATZ        

Steven J. Katz

Vice President and Controller

February 20, 2015

Steven J. Katz

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 24, 2012



CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II—II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014

(Dollars in millions)

 

        Additions  Deductions       

(Dollars in millions)

  Beginning
Balance
   Charged to
Expenses
  Acquired  Amounts
Written Off
  Foreign
Exchange
  Ending
Balance
 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        

2011

  $5.5    $(0.6 $0.0   $(3.0 $(0.1 $1.8  

2010

   5.8     (0.2  0.0    (0.1  0.0    5.5  

2009

   5.4     0.6    0.0    (0.3  0.1    5.8  

Allowance for Cash Discounts

        

2011

  $4.3    $52.9   $0.0   $(53.3 $0.1   $4.0  

2010

   4.1     49.8    0.0    (49.6  0.0    4.3  

2009

   4.3     48.6    0.0    (48.8  0.0    4.1  

Sales Returns and Allowances

        

2011

  $9.7    $40.1   $0.0   $(39.7 $0.0   $10.1  

2010

   10.3     39.0    0.0    (40.0  0.4    9.7  

2009

   19.8     43.5    (3.1  (50.0  0.1    10.3  

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Charged to

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Foreign

 

Ending

 

 

Balance

 

Expenses

 

Acquired

 

Written Off

 

Exchange

 

Balance

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$          0.8

 

$          1.5

 

$          0.0

 

$           (0.2)

 

$       (0.2)

 

$            1.9

2013

 

0.8

 

0.3

 

0.0

 

(0.3)

 

0.0

 

0.8

2012

 

1.8

 

(0.7)

 

0.0

 

(0.2)

 

(0.1)

 

0.8

Allowance for Cash Discounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$          5.1

 

$          66.9

 

$          0.0

 

$        (67.0)

 

$         0.2

 

$          5.2

2013

 

4.9

 

65.2

 

0.0

 

(65.1)

 

0.1

 

5.1

2012

 

4.0

 

57.7

 

0.7

 

(57.4)

 

(0.1)

 

4.9

Sales Returns and Allowances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$          11.6

 

$          58.6

 

$          0.0

 

$        (58.1)

 

$       (0.2)

 

$          11.9

2013

 

17.5

 

49.5

 

0.0

 

(55.2)

 

(0.2)

 

11.6

2012

 

10.1

 

51.7

 

0.7

 

(44.9)

 

(0.1)

 

17.5

98