UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

 

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 20122013

or

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                                         to                                                         

Commission File Number          1-8399

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Ohio

  

31-1189815

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

200 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Columbus, Ohio

  

43085

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)  (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

  

(614) 438-3210

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

  

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Shares, Without Par Value

  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  þ    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.        Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).        Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.            ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  þ       Accelerated filer  ¨       Non-accelerated filer  ¨       Smaller reporting company  ¨

                                                                                  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).        Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the Common Shares (the only common equity of the Registrant) held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on November 30, 2011,2012, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $865,736,564.$1,172,788,263. For this purpose, executive officers and directors of the Registrant are considered affiliates.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On July 23, 2012,22, 2013, the number of Common Shares issued and outstanding was 69,328,093.69,551,896.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Selected portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be furnished to shareholders of the Registrant in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 27, 2012,26, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent provided herein.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

   ii  

PART I

    

Item 1.

  

Business

   1  

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

   11  

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   2122  

Item 2.

  

Properties

   2122  

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   2324  

Item 4.

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

   2324  

Supplemental Item.

  

Executive Officers of the Registrant

   2324  

PART II

    

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   26  

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   29  

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   31  

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   5553  

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   5756  

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   115112  

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   115112  

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   118114  

PART III

    

Item 10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   119115  

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

   120116  

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

   120116  

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   121117  

Item 14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   121117  

PART IV

    

Item 15.

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

   122118  

Signatures

    123

Index to Exhibits

     E-1  

 

i


SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Selected statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, in “PART I – Item 1. – Business” and “PART II – Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events. These statements are often identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or other similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to:

 

  

outlook, strategy or business plans or plans;

future or expected growth, performance, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures;

  

projected profitability potential, capacity, and working capital needs;

  

demand trends for us or our markets;

additions to product lines and opportunities to participate in new markets;

  

pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes;

  

anticipated capital expenditures and asset sales;

  

anticipated improvements and efficiencies in costs, operations, sales, inventory management, sourcing and the supply chain and the results thereof;

  

the ability to make acquisitions and the projected timing, results, benefits, costs, charges and expenditures related to acquisitions, newly-created joint ventures, headcount reductions and facility dispositions, shutdowns and consolidations;

  

the alignment of operations with demand;

  

the ability to operate profitably and generate cash in down markets;

  

the ability to maintain margins and capture and maintain market share and to develop or take advantage of future opportunities, new products and new markets;

  

expectations for Company and customer inventories, jobs and orders;

  

expectations for the economy and markets or improvements therein;

  

expected benefits from transformation plans, cost reduction efforts and other new initiatives;

  

expectations for increasing volatility or improving and sustaining earnings, earnings potential, margins or shareholder value;

  

effects of judicial and governmental agency rulings; and

  

other non-historical matters.

Because they are based on beliefs, estimates and assumptions, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Any number of factors could affect actual results, including, without limitation, those that follow:

 

  

the effect of national, regional and worldwide economic conditions generally and within major product markets, including a prolonged or substantial economic downturn;

  

the outcome of negotiations surrounding the United States debt and budget, which may be adverse due to its impact on tax increases, governmental spending, and customer confidence and spending;

the effect of conditions in national and worldwide financial markets;

  

product demand and pricing;

adverse impacts associated with the recent voluntary recall of our MAP-PRO®, propylene and MAAP® cylinders, including recall costs, legal and notification expenses, lost sales and potential negative customer perceptions of certain pressure cylinder products;

  

changes in product mix, product substitution and market acceptance of our products;

  

fluctuations in the pricing, quality or availability of raw materials (particularly steel),supplies, transportation, utilities and other items required by operations;

  

effects of facility closures and the consolidation of operations;

  

the effect of financial difficulties, consolidation and other changes within the steel, automotive, construction and other industries in which we participate;

  

failure to maintain appropriate levels of inventories;

 

ii


  

financial difficulties (including bankruptcy filings) of original equipment manufacturers, end-users and customers, suppliers, joint venture partners and others with whom we do business;

  

the ability to realize targeted expense reductions from headcount reductions, facility closures and other cost reduction efforts;

  

the ability to realize other cost savings and operational, sales and sourcing improvements and efficiencies, and other expected benefits from transformation initiatives, on a timely basis;

  

the overall success of, and the ability to integrate, newly-acquired businesses and joint ventures, maintain and develop their customers, and achieve synergies and other expected benefits therefrom;

the overall success of newly-created joint ventures, including the demand for their products, and the ability to achieve the anticipated benefitscost savings therefrom;

  

capacity levels and efficiencies, within facilities, within major product markets and within the industry as a whole;

  

the effect of disruption in the business of suppliers, customers, facilities and shipping operations due to adverse weather, casualty events, equipment breakdowns, acts of war or terrorist activities or other causes;

  

changes in customer demand, inventories, spending patterns, product choices, and supplier choices;

  

risks associated with doing business internationally, including economic, political and social instability, foreign currency exposure and the acceptance of our products in new markets;

  

the ability to improve and maintain processes and business practices to keep pace with the economic, competitive and technological environment;

  

the outcome of adverse claims experience with respect to workers’ compensation, product recalls or product liability, casualty events or other matters;

  

deviation of actual results from estimates and/or assumptions used by us in the application of our significant accounting policies;

  

level of imports and import prices in our markets;

  

the impact of the outcome of judicial and governmental agency rulings as well as the impact of governmental regulations, both in the United States and abroad, including those adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and other governmental agencies as contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, both2010;

the effect of changes to healthcare laws in the United States, which may increase our healthcare and abroad;other costs and negatively impact our financial results and operations; and

  

other risks described from time to time in the filings of Worthington Industries, Inc. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including those described in “PART I – Item 1A. — Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form10-K.

We note these factors for investors as contemplated by the Act. It is impossible to predict or identify all potential risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the foregoing list to be a complete set of all potential risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on current information as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we assume no obligation to correct or update any such statements in the future, except as required by applicable law.

 

iii


PART I

Item 1. — Business

General Overview

Worthington Industries, Inc. is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Ohio (individually, the “Registrant” or “Worthington Industries” or, collectively with the subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc., “we,” “our,” “Worthington” or the “Company”). Founded in 1955, Worthington is primarily a diversified metals processingmanufacturing company, focused on value-added steel processing and manufactured metal products. Our manufactured metal products include: pressure cylinder products such as propane, oxygen, and helium tanks, hand torches, refrigerant and industrial cylinders, hand torches, camping cylinders, scuba tanks, compressed natural gas cylinders, and helium balloon kits;kits, and steel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for primarily the oil and gas industry; engineered cabs and operator stations and cab components; framing systems for mid-rise buildings; steel pallets and racks; and, through joint ventures, suspension grid systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings; laser welded blanks; light gauge steel framing for commercial and residential construction; and current and past model automotive service stampings.

Worthington is headquartered at 200 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Columbus, Ohio 43085, telephone (614) 438-3210. The common shares of Worthington Industries are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WOR.

Worthington Industries maintains an Internet web site at www.worthingtonindustries.com. This uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference only and is not intended to incorporate Worthington Industries’ web site into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as well as Worthington Industries’ definitive annual meeting proxy materials filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge, on or through the Worthington Industries web site, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Segments

At the end of the fiscal year ended May 31, 20122013 (“fiscal 2012”2013”), we had 3536 wholly-owned manufacturing facilities worldwide and held equity positions in 12 joint ventures, which operated an additional 4447 manufacturing facilities worldwide.

Our operations are managed principally on a products and services basis and include fourthree reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Engineered Cabs and, on an historical basis, Metal Framing.Cabs. The Steel Processing reportable business segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit (“Worthington Steel”), and includes Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. (“PSM”), a specialty stainless processor located in Los Angeles, California, and Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), a consolidated joint venture that operates a cold-rolled hot dipped galvanizing line in Monroe, Michigan. The Pressure Cylinders reportable business segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit (“Worthington Cylinders”) and includes India-based Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), a consolidated joint venture that manufactures high-pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles and for industrial gases. The Engineered Cabs reportable business segment consists of the Angus Industries business unit (“Angus”), which we acquired on December 29, 2011.

All other operating segments are combined and disclosed in the Other category, which also includes income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments. The Metal Framing reportable business segment consists ofOther category includes the remaining assets of our former Dietrich Metal Framing business unitSteel Packaging, Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations (“Dietrich”WEI”). operating segments.

As more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of our former Dietrich Metal Framing business unit (“Dietrich”) to ClarkWesternClarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”), an unconsolidated joint venture in which we maintain a 25% noncontrolling interest. We retained certain metal framing facilities, which continued to operate in support of

the joint venture. As of August 31, 2011, all of the retained facilities had ceased operations. We no longer manage our residual metal framing assets in a manner that constitutes an operating segment. Accordingly, the financial results and operating performance of our former Metal Framing operating segment, including activity related to the retained facilities have beenwind-down of this business, are reported within Metal Framing through August 31, 2011. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, have been reported within Metal Framing on a historical basis.

All other operating segments are combined and disclosed in the Other category which also includes income and expense items not allocated to our reportable business segments. The Other category includes the Worthington Steelpac Systems, LLC (“Steel Packaging”) and Worthington Global Group, LLC (the “Global Group”) operating segments as well asfor segment reporting purposes.

In addition, the former Automotive Body Panels operating segment has been included in the Other category, on a historical basis, through May 9, 2011. On May 9, 2011, we closed an agreement to combine certain assets of The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”) and International Tooling Solutions, LLC in a new joint venture, ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”). In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 50% noncontrolling ownership interest in the new joint venture in addition to certain cash and other consideration.

We hold equity positions in 12 joint ventures, which are further discussed in theJoint Ventures section herein.below. The PSI Energy Solutions, LLC,WEI, Spartan, and WNCL joint ventures are consolidated with their operating results reported within the Other, Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders reportable business segments, respectively.

During fiscal 2012,2013, the Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Engineered Cabs operating segments served approximately 1,100, 4,1001,000, 4,400, and 100 customers, respectively, located primarily in the United States. Foreign operations accounted for approximately 8%7% of consolidated net sales during fiscal 20122013 and were comprised primarily of sales to customers in Europe. No single customer accounted for over 10% of consolidated net sales during fiscal 2012.2013.

Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note MN – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a full description of our reportable business segments.

Recent Developments

On March 22,August 10, 2012, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 12-year Senior Notes due 2024 through a private placement with seven entities within the Prudential Capital Group. The Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.6%.

On September 17, 2012, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired a 75% ownership interest in PSI Energy Solutions, LLC100% of the outstanding common shares of Westerman, Inc. (“PSI”Westerman”). PSI is a professional services firm that develops cost-effective energy solutions for publiccash consideration of approximately $62.7 million and private entities throughout North America. The acquired net assetsthe assumption of approximately $7.3 million of debt, which was repaid at closing. Westerman manufactures tanks, pressure vessels and other products for the oil and gas and nuclear markets as well as hoists and other products for marine applications. Westerman also leverages its manufacturing competencies to produce pressure vessels, atmospheric tanks, controls and various custom machined components for other industrial end markets. Westerman became part of our Global GroupPressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing and will be reported in the “Other” category for segment reporting purposes.

On January 10, 2012, we announced a voluntary recall of our MAP-PRO®, propylene and MAAP® cylinders and related hand torch kits. The recall was a precautionary step and involved a valve supplied by a third party that may leak when a torch or hose is disconnected from the cylinder. We are unaware of any incidence of fire or injury caused by this situation. For additional information regarding the recall, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.closing.

On December 29, 2011, weOctober 31, 2012, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment completed the sale of its European air brake tank business to Frauenthal Automotive. Based in Hustopece, Czech Republic, Worthington Cylinders a.s. manufactured air brake tank cylinders for the European commercial vehicle market.

On April 9, 2013, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired the outstanding economic interests of Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”). Angus designs and manufactures high-quality, custom-engineered open and closed cabs and operator stations for a wide range of heavy mobile equipment. In connection with this acquisition, we established a new operating segment, Engineered Cabs, which is comprised of the operations of Angus and is considered a separate reportable segment.

On December 1, 2011, we acquired the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company,Palmer Mfg. & Tank, Inc. (“Coleman Cylinders”Palmer”). for cash consideration of $113.5 million. Palmer manufactures steel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for the oil and gas industry, and custom manufactured fiberglass tanks for agricultural,

chemical and general industrial applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closingclosing.

During the fourth quarter of the transaction. Subsequent to closing,fiscal 2013, we receivedrepurchased a request from the Federal Trade

Commission, asking us to provide, on a voluntary basis, certain information related to the acquisition and the industry as it conducts a preliminary investigation into the transaction. The acquisition fell below the thresholdtotal of 925,000 of our common shares for pre-merger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.$30.4 million at an average price of $32.88 per share.

On September 30, 2011,June 21, 2013, we completedannounced the acquisition of Poland-based STAKO sp.Z o.o. (“STAKO”). STAKO manufactures liquefied natural gas, propane and butane fuel tanks for use in passenger cars, buses and trucks. The acquired business became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction.

On July 1, 2011, we purchased substantially all of the net assets (excluding accounts receivable)planned consolidation of the BernzOmatic business (“Bernz”)hand torch manufacturing operations in Medina, New York into our existing facility in Chilton, Wisconsin. The Company estimates that the consolidation and closure will result in non-recurring restructuring charges in the range of Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary$4.0 million to $5.0 million, primarily due to severance costs, relocation and equipment installation, training costs and other miscellaneous start-up costs. Approximately $2.5 million of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. Bernz is a leading manufacturerseverance costs were recognized in the fourth quarter of hand held torches and accessories.fiscal 2013 in connection with this matter. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closingclosure of the transaction.Medina operation is expected to be complete by mid-calendar 2014 to ensure an orderly transition.

On June 26, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share, an increase of $0.02 per share from the previous quarterly dividend rate. The dividend is payable on September 27, 2013 to shareholders of record on September 13, 2013.

Transformation Plan

In our fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”), we initiated a transformation plan (the “Transformation Plan”) with the overall goal of improving our sustainable earnings potential, asset utilization and operational performance. To accomplish this, theThe Transformation Plan focuses on cost reduction, margin expansion and organizational capability improvements and in the process, seeks to drive excellence in three core competencies: sales, operations, and supply chain management. The Transformation Plan is comprehensive in scope and includes aggressive diagnostic and implementation phases.

WeTo date, we have completed the transformation phases in each of the core facilities within our Steel Processing operating segment, in fiscal 2011, andincluding the facilities of our Mexican joint venture. We also substantially completed the transformation phases at our metal framing facilities prior to their contribution to ClarkDietrich in March 2011. DuringTransformation efforts within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, which began during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, are ongoing. In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated the diagnosticsdiagnostic phase of the Transformation Plan in our Pressure CylindersEngineered Cabs operating segment.

When this process began, we retained a consulting firm to assist in the development and implementation of the Transformation Plan. As the Transformation Plan progressed, we formed internal teams dedicated to this effort, and they ultimately assumed full responsibility for executing the Transformation Plan. Although the consulting firm was again engaged as we rolled out the Transformation Plan in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, mostall of the work is now being doneled and executed by our internal teams. These internal teams are now an integral part of our business and constitute what we refer to as the Centers of Excellence (“COE”). The COE will continue to monitor the performance metrics and new processes instituted across our transformed operations and drive continuous improvements in all areas of our operations. The majority of the expenses related to the COE will be included in selling, general and administrative expense going forward, except where they relate to a first time diagnostics phase of the Transformation Plan.

As of May 31, 2012,2013, we have recognized approximately $73.9$77.2 million of total restructuring charges associated with the Transformation Plan, including charges of $3.3 million, $6.0 million, $2.6 million, $4.2 million, $43.0 million and $18.1 million during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011, fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our restructuring activities. That information is incorporated herein by reference.

Steel Processing

Our Steel Processing operating segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit, which includes PSM and our consolidated joint venture, Spartan. For fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, the percentage of consolidated net sales generated by our Steel Processing operating segment was approximately 62%55%, 58%62%, and 51%58%, respectively.

Worthington Steel is one of the largest independent intermediate processors of flat-rolled steel in the United States. It occupies a niche in the steel industry by focusing on products requiring exact specifications. These products cannot typically be supplied as efficiently by steel mills to the end-users of these products.

Our Steel Processing operating segment serves approximately 1,1001,000 customers, principally in the agricultural, appliance, automotive, construction, hardware, furniture, HVAC, lawn and garden, leisure and recreation, and office equipment and tubingfurniture markets. Automotive-related customers have historically represented approximately half of this operating segment’s net sales. No single customer represented greater than 10% of net sales for the Steel Processing operating segment during fiscal 2012.2013.

Worthington Steel buys coils of steel from integrated steel mills and mini-mills and processes them to the precise type, thickness, length, width, shape and surface quality required by customer specifications. Computer-aided processing capabilities include, among others:

 

pickling, a chemical process using an acidic solution to remove surface oxide which develops on hot-rolled steel;

slitting, which cuts steel to specific widths;

cold reducing, which achieves close tolerances of thickness;

configured blanking, which stamps steel into specific shapes;

cutting-to-length, which cuts flattened steel sheets to exact lengths;

dry-lubing, the process of coating steel with a dry, soap-based lubricant;

edging, which conditions the edges of the steel by imparting round, smooth or knurled edges;

 

hot-dipped galvanizing, which coats steel with zinc and zinc alloys through a hot-dip process;

 

hydrogen annealing, a thermal process that changes the hardness and certain metallurgical characteristics of steel;

 

cutting-to-length,pickling, a chemical process using an acidic solution to remove surface oxide which develops on hot-rolled steel;

primacoat, which is a high-lubricity, acrylic-based coating;

slitting, which cuts flattened steel coils or steel sheets to exact lengths;specific widths;

oscillate slitting, a slitting process that spools together several narrow coils welded end to end into one larger coil;

temper rolling, which is the process of light cold-rolling sheet steel;

 

tension leveling, a method of applying pressure to achieve precise flatness tolerances for steel;

edging, which conditions the edges of the steel by imparting round, smooth or knurled edges;tolerances; and

 

non-metallic coating, including dry lubrication, acrylic and paint coating; and

configured blanking, which stamps steel into specific shapes.coating.

Worthington Steel also toll processes steel for steel mills, large end-users, service centers and other processors. Toll processing is different from typical steel processing in that the mill, end-user or other party retains title to the steel and has the responsibility for selling the end product. Toll processing enhances Worthington Steel’s participation in the market for wide sheet steel and large standard orders, which is a market generally served by steel mills rather than by intermediate steel processors.

The steel processing industry is fragmented and highly competitive. There are many competitors, including other independent intermediate processors. Competition is primarily on the basis of price, product

quality and the ability to meet delivery requirements. Technical service and support for material testing and customer-specific applications enhance the quality of products (See(see “Item 1. – Business – Technical Services”). However, the extent to which technical service capability has improved Worthington Steel’s competitive position has not been quantified. Worthington Steel’s ability to meet tight delivery schedules is, in part, based on the proximity of our facilities to customers, suppliers and one another. The extent to which plant location has impacted Worthington Steel’s competitive position has not been quantified. Processed steel products are priced competitively, primarily based on market factors, including, among other things, market pricing, the cost and availability of raw materials, transportation and shipping costs, and overall economic conditions in the United States and abroad.

Pressure Cylinders

Our Pressure Cylinders operating segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit and our consolidated joint venture, WNCL. For fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, the percentage of consolidated net sales generated by our Pressure Cylinders operating segment was approximately 33%, 30%, 24% and 24%, respectively.

Our Pressure Cylinders operating segment manufactures and sells filled and unfilled pressure cylinders, tanks, and various accessories and related products for diversified end-use market applications. The following is a detailed discussiondescription of these markets:

 

  

Retail: These products include liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) cylinders for barbecue grills and camping equipment, propane accessories, hand held torches and accessories including fuel cylinders, scuba cylinders, paintball cylinders and Balloon Time® helium balloon kits. These products are sold primarily to mass merchandisers, cylinder exchangers and distributors. Revenues to these marketsthis market sector totaled $335.7$374.8 million and $212.5$339.6 million in fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, respectively.

 

Alternative fuels: TheThis sector includes Type I, II, III and IIIASME cylinders for containment of compressed natural gas and hydrogen for automobiles, buses, and light-duty trucks, as well as propane/autogas cylinders for automobiles. Revenues to these marketsthis market sector totaled $54.2$76.0 million and $23.1$60.5 million in fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, respectively.

 

Industrial and Other: This market sector includes industrial, refrigerant, and certain LPG cylinders, as well as other specialty products. Cylinders in these markets are generally sold to gas producers and distributors. Industrial cylinders hold fuel for uses such as cutting, welding, breathing (medical, diving and firefighting), semiconductor production, and beverage delivery. Refrigerant gas cylinders are used to hold refrigerant gases for commercial, residential and automotive air conditioning and refrigeration systems. LPG cylinders hold fuel for recreational vehicle equipment, residential and light commercial heating systems, industrial forklifts and commercial/residential cooking (the latter, generally outside North America). Specialty products include air reservoirs for truck and truck trailers, which are sold to original equipment manufacturers, and a variety of fire suppression and chemical tanks. Revenues to these marketsthis market sector totaled $380.2$341.2 million and $356.3$370.0 million in fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, respectively.

Energy: This sector was formed in fiscal 2013 as a result of the Westerman and Palmer acquisitions and includes steel and fiberglass tanks, and pressure vessels and other products for global energy markets, including oil and gas and nuclear, which products are used for a broad variety of exploration, recovery and production purposes; and hoists and other marine products which are used principally in shipyard lift systems. This sector also leverages its manufacturing competencies to produce pressure vessels, atmospheric tanks, controls and various custom machined components for other industrial and agricultural end markets. Revenues to this market sector totaled $67.3 million in fiscal 2013. As noted in the Recent Developments section above, on September 17, 2012, we acquired Westerman, a manufacturer of tanks and pressure vessels for the oil and gas, nuclear and marine markets with two Ohio locations. On April 9, 2013, we acquired the business of Palmer, a manufacturer of steel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for the

oil and gas industry, and custom manufactured fiberglass tanks for agricultural, chemical and general industrial applications with one location in Garden City, Kansas. Both of these businesses sell into the energy market.

While a large percentage of Pressure Cylinders sales are made to major accounts, this operating segment serves approximately 4,1004,400 customers. No single customer represented greater than 10% of net sales for the Pressure Cylinders operating segment during fiscal 2012.

The Pressure Cylinders operating segment produces low-pressure steel cylinders in a wide range of refrigerant capacities, and steel and aluminum cylinders in a wide range of LPG capacities. Low-pressure cylinders are produced by precision stamping, drawing, welding and/or brazing component parts to customer specifications. They are then tested, painted and packaged, as required. High-pressure cylinders are manufactured by several processes, including deep drawing, tube spinning, and billet piercing for steel cylinders. High-pressure, composite-wrapped aluminum cylinders are deep drawn or tube spun.2013.

In the United States and Canada, high-pressure and low-pressure cylinders are primarily manufactured in accordance with United States Department of Transportation and Transport Canada specifications. Outside the United States and Canada, cylinders are manufactured according to European norm specifications, as well as various other international standards. Other products are produced to applicable industry standards including, as applicable, those standards issued by the American Petroleum Institute, ASME and UL.

In the United States and Canada, Worthington Cylinders has one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure non-refillable refrigerant market, one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure LPG cylinder market, and three principal domestic competitors in the high-pressure cylinder market. There are also several foreign competitors in these markets. We believe that Worthington Cylinders has the largest domestic market share in both of its LPG gas low-pressure cylinder markets. In the European high-pressure cylinder market, there are also several competitors. We believe that Worthington Cylinders is a leading producer in both the high-pressure cylinder and low-pressure non-refillable cylinder markets in Europe. Worthington Cylinders generally has a strong competitive position for its energy, retail and specialty products, but competition varies on a product-by-product basis.basis, and geographically for energy products. As with our other operating segments, competition is based upon price, service and quality.

The Pressure Cylinders operating segment uses the trade name “Worthington Cylinders” to conduct business and the registered trademark “Balloon Time®” to market low-pressure helium balloon kits; the registered trademark “Bernzomatic®” to market certain fuel cylinders and hand held torches; the trademark “WORTHINGTONTM” to market certain LPG cylinders, hand torches and camping fuel cylinders; the registered trademarks “MAP-PRO®” and “Pro-Max®” to market certain hand torch cylinders; and the registered trademark SCI® to market certain cylinders for transportation of compressed gases for inflation of flotation bags and escape slides, Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (“SCBA”) for firefightingslides; and cylindersthe tradenames “Westerman,” “Wooster Tool” and “Palmer” to contain compressed natural gas.market the tanks and other products produced by those operations. The Pressure Cylinders operating segment intends to continue to use and renew these registeredtradenames and trademarks.

In connection with the acquisition of the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company, Inc. (“Coleman Cylinders”), in fiscal 2012, we executed a trademark license agreement whereby we are required to make minimum annual royalty payments of $2,000,000$2.0 million in exchange for the exclusive right to use certain Coleman trademarks within the United States and Canada in connection with our operation of the acquired business.

As noted in theRecent Developmentssection above, on September 30, 2011, we acquired STAKO, a leading European producer of automotive LPG cylinders with two locations in Poland. On December 1, 2011, we acquired Coleman Cylinders. Both of those businesses became part of the Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon their acquisition dates during fiscal 2012.

Engineered Cabs

The Engineered Cabs operating segment consists of the Angus Industries business unit, which was acquired on December 29, 2011, and includes the Angus-Palm, Angus Engineering and Advanced Component Technologies (“ACT®”) brands. Angus is headquartered in Watertown, South Dakota and has additional operations in Iowa, South Carolina and Tennessee. InTennessee, which are strategically located near key assembly locations of original equipment manufacturers. For fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, approximately 4%the percentage of consolidated net sales were generated by our Engineered Cabs operating segment.segment was approximately 9%, and 4%, respectively. On an annualized basis, Engineered Cabsfiscal 2012 net sales would have represented approximately 10% of consolidated net sales.

Angus is North America’s leading non-captive designer and manufacturer of high-quality, custom-engineered operatoropen and enclosed cabs and operator stations and custom fabrications of heavy mobile equipment used primarily in the agricultural, construction, mining, forestry, military, and various other industries. AngusAngus’s product design, engineering support and broad manufacturing capabilities enable it to produce cabs areand structures used in products ranging from small utility equipment to the largest earthmovers.

Angus produces products for over 150 different equipment platforms for approximately 100 customers, although six customers have historically represented approximately 75% of this operating segment’s net sales.

In addition to its engineered cab products, Angus has the capability to provide a full suite of complementary products such as machinemachined structural components, complex and painted weldments, engine doors, boom components and complete frames, as well as a complete range of vacuum-formed plastic/acoustical trim components and assemblies under the ACT brand. Angus has the manufacturing capability for:

 

Steel laser cutting;

 

Steel bending and forming;

 

Roll-form tube curving and bending;

 

Machining;

 

Welding – robotic and manual;

 

Automated steel product cleaning and E-coating;

 

Top coat painting; and

 

Assembly.

Angus produces products for over 150 different equipment platforms for approximately 100 customers. In fiscal 2013, Angus’s top four customers represented approximately 80% of the operating segment’s total net sales. Its production levels can run from small and medium production volumes through high volume productions.

Angus competes primarily with a handful of primary non-captive producers of engineered cabs in the United States, although there are numerous other suppliers who can perform some of the functions supplied by the Company. Some customers can also produce operator cabs in-house. The Company believes its competitive strengths include its design and engineering capabilities and its broad manufacturing capabilities, which allow it to provide a fully-integrated complete cab, and its ability often to provide cabs at a lower cost than customers can produce in-house. Competition is based on price, quality, delivery and service.

Key supplies include steel sheet and plate, steel tubing, hardware, controls, wiper systems, glazing materials (glass, polycarbonate), perishables (paint, urethane, caulk), electrical materials, HVAC systems and aesthetic materials (acoustical trim, plastics, foam) which are available from a variety of sources.

Other

TheIncluded in the Other category consists ofare operating segments that do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria and materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure andas reportable business segments, as well as other corporate relatedcorporate-related entities. Through May 9, 2011, theseThese operating segments included Automotive Body Panels,are: Steel Packaging, Construction Services and the Global Group. On May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels subsidiary, Gerstenslager, to ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”) and the resulting deconsolidation of the contributed net assets, we ceased to maintain a separate Automotive Body Panels operating segment. Accordingly, subsequent to May 9, 2011, the operating segments comprising the Other category have consisted of Steel Packaging and the Global Group.WEI. Each of these three operating segments is explained in more detail below.

Steel Packaging.Packaging.    The Steel Packaging operating segment consists of Worthington Steelpac Systems, LLC, an ISO-9001: 2000 certified manufacturer of engineered, recyclable steel packaging solutions for external and internal movement of product. Steel Packaging operates three facilities, with one facility in each of Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Steel Packaging designs and manufactures reusable custom platforms, racks and pallets made of steel for supporting, protecting and handling products throughout the shipping process for customers in industries such as automotive, lawn and garden and recreational vehicles.

Global GroupConstruction Services.The purpose of the Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment is to identify and develop potential growth platforms by applying our core competencies in metals manufacturing and construction methods. The Global Group operates a business platform that includes high density mid-rise residential construction in emerging and developed international markets and includes the Mid-Rise Construction, Military Construction and Commercial Stairs business units as well as the recently-formed Global Development Group and Worthington Energy Group business units. The Worthington Energy Group business unit includes our recently-acquired and 75%-owned joint venture, PSI, a services firm that develops cost-effective energy solutions for public and private entities throughout North America. Other operating activities of the Global Group include the design, supply and building/construction of mid-rise light gauge steel framed commercial structures, single family and multi-family housing units;units. The operating segment includes the Worthington Construction Group and the supplyMilitary Construction business units. Worthington Construction Group includes high density mid-rise residential construction in emerging and construction of metal framing products for, and used in the framing of, single and multi-family housing,developed international markets. Military Construction operates with a focus on domestic military bases. During the fourth quarter

Worthington Energy Innovations.    The WEI Operating segment is comprised of fiscal 2012, we formalized plans to close the Commercial Stairs business unit.our 75% WEI joint venture which is described below under “Joint Ventures.”

Segment Financial Data

Financial information for the reportable business segments is provided in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note MN – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That financial information is incorporated herein by reference.

Financial Information About Geographic Areas

In fiscal 2012,2013, our foreign operations represented 8%7% of consolidated net sales, 4%1% of pre-tax earnings attributable to controlling interest and 30%19% of consolidated net assets. During fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, we had consolidated operations in Austria, Canada, China, the Czech Republic (through October 2012), Poland (beginning in fiscal 2012), Portugal, and the United States. Our consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures had operations in China, France, India (beginning in fiscal 2011), Mexico, Poland (beginning in fiscal 2012), PortugalSpain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Summary information about our foreign operations, including net sales and fixed assets by geographic region, is provided in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Risks and Uncertainties” and “Note MN – Segment Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. That information is incorporated herein by reference.

Suppliers

The primary raw material purchased by Worthington is steel. We purchase steel from major primary producers of steel, both domestic and foreign. The amount purchased from any particular supplier varies from year to year depending on a number of factors including market conditions, then current relationships and prices and terms offered. In nearly all market conditions, steel is available from a number of suppliers and generally any supplier relationship or contract can and has been replaced with little or no significant interruption to our business. In fiscal 2012,2013, we purchased approximately 1.91.8 million tons of steel (80%(81% hot-rolled, 5%4% galvanized and 15%16% cold-rolled) on a consolidated basis. Steel is purchased in large quantities at regular intervals from major primary producers, both domestic and foreign. In the Steel Processing operating segment, steel is primarily purchased and processed based on specific customer orders. The Pressure Cylinders operating segment purchases steel to meet production schedules. For certain raw materials, there are more limited suppliers — for example, helium and zinc, which are generally purchased at market prices. Since there are a limited number of suppliers in the helium and zinc markets, if delivery from a major supplier is disrupted due to a force majeure type occurrence, it may be difficult to obtain an alternative supply. Raw materials are generally purchased in the open market on a negotiated spot-market basis at prevailing market prices. Supply contracts are also entered into, some of which have fixed pricing and some of which are indexed (monthly or quarterly). During fiscal 2012,2013, we purchased steel from the following major suppliers, in alphabetical order: AK Steel Corporation; ArcelorMittal; Essar Steel Algoma Inc.; Gallatin Steel Company; NLMK USA; North Star BlueScope Steel, LLC; Nucor Corporation; RG Steel, LLC; Severstal North America, Inc.; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; ThyssenKrupp and United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”). Alcoa, Inc. was the primaryMajor suppliers of aluminum supplier forto the Pressure Cylinders operating segment in fiscal 2012.2013 were, in alphabetical order: Alcoa; Rio Tinto Alcan; and Sapa Group. Major suppliers of zinc to the Steel Processing operating segment

were, in alphabetical order: Considar Metal Marketing Inc. (a/k/a HudBay); Teck Cominco Limited; U.S. Zinc; and Xstrata Zinc Canada. Approximately 33.024.1 million pounds of zinc were purchased in fiscal 2012.2013. We believe our supplier relationships are good.

Technical Services

We employ a staff of engineers and other technical personnel and maintain fully equipped laboratories to support operations. These facilities enable verification, analysis and documentation of the physical, chemical, metallurgical and mechanical properties of raw materials and products. Technical service personnel also work in conjunction with the sales force to determine the types of flat-rolled steel required for customer needs. Additionally, technical service personnel design and engineer metal framing structures and provide sealed shop drawings to the building construction markets. Engineers at Angus design cabs and cab manufacturing processes. To provide these services, we maintain a continuing program of developmental engineering with respect to product characteristics and performance under varying conditions. Laboratory facilities also perform metallurgical and chemical testing as dictated by the regulations of the United States Department of Transportation, Transport Canada, and other associated agencies, along with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and customer requirements. An IASI (International Accreditations Service, Incorporated) accredited product-testing laboratory supports these design efforts.

Seasonality and Backlog

Sales are generally strongest in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year as our operating segments are generally operating at seasonal peaks. Historically, sales have generally been weaker in the third quarter of our fiscal year, primarily due to reduced activity in the building and construction industry as a result of inclement weather, as well as customer plant shutdowns in the automotive industry due to holidays. We do not believe backlog is a significant indicator of our business.

Employees

As of May 31, 2012,2013, we had approximately 10,500 employees, including those employed by our unconsolidated joint ventures. Approximately 6%7% of these employees are represented by collective bargaining units. Worthington believes it has good relationships with its employees in general, including those covered by collective bargaining units.

Joint Ventures

As part of our strategy to selectively develop new products, markets and technological capabilities and to expand our international presence, while mitigating the risks and costs associated with those activities, we participate in three consolidated and nine unconsolidated joint ventures.

Consolidated

PSI is a 75%-owned consolidated joint venture with a subsidiary of Professional Supply, Inc. (20%) and Stonehenge Structured Finance Partners, LLC (5%) (together referred to as “PSI Partners”), located in Fremont, Ohio. PSI is a professional services company that develops cost-effective energy solutions for entities in North America. PSI designs solutions to minimize energy consumption, manages the energy solution installation, monitors and verifies energy usage, guarantees future energy savings and shares in these savings. Additionally, PSI utilizes certain patented products to further enhance energy savings. PSI’s financial results are reported within the Other category for reporting purposes. The equity owned by the PSI Partners is shown as non-controlling interest on our consolidated balance sheets and the PSI Partners’ portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to non-controlling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

 

Spartan is a 52%-owned consolidated joint venture with a subsidiary of Severstal North America, Inc. (“Severstal”), located in Monroe, Michigan. It operates a cold-rolled, hot-dipped galvanizing line for toll processing steel coils into galvanized and galvannealed products intended primarily for the automotive industry. Spartan’s financial results are fully consolidated within our Steel Processing reportable business segment. The equity owned by Severstal is shown as non-controllingnoncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheets and Severstal’s portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to non-controllingnoncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

 

WEI is a 75%-owned consolidated joint venture with a subsidiary of Professional Supply, Inc. (20%) and Stonehenge Structured Finance Partners, LLC (5%) (together referred to as “WEI Partners”), located in Fremont, Ohio. WEI is a professional services company that develops cost-effective energy solutions for entities in North America. WEI designs solutions to minimize energy consumption, manages the energy

solution installation, monitors and verifies energy usage, guarantees future energy savings and shares in these savings. Additionally, WEI utilizes certain patented products to further enhance energy savings. WEI’s financial results are reported within the Other category for segment reporting purposes. The equity owned by the WEI Partners is shown as noncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheets and the WEI Partners’ portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

WNCL is a 60%-owned consolidated joint venture based in India with India-based Nitin CylindersFire Protection Industries Limited (“Nitin”Nitin Fire”). WNCL manufactures high-pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles, and produces cylinders for compressed industrial gases. WNCL’s financial results are fully consolidated within our Pressure Cylinders reportable business segment. The equity owned by Nitin is shown as non-controllingnoncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheets and Nitin’s portion of net earnings is included as net earnings attributable to non-controllingnoncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

Unconsolidated

 

ArtiFlex, a 50%-owned joint venture with International Tooling Solutions, LLC, provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. ArtiFlex operates fivefour owned and two leased manufacturing facilities. These facilities are located in Kentucky, Michigan (3) and Ohio (3)(2).

 

ClarkDietrich, a 25%-owned joint venture with ClarkWestern Building Systems, LLC,Inc., is the industry leader in the manufacture and supply of light gauge steel framing products in the United States. ClarkDietrich manufactures a full line of drywall studs and accessories, structural studs and joists, metal lath and accessories, shaft wall studs and track, and vinyl products used primarily in residential and commercial construction. This joint venture operates 1413 manufacturing facilities, one each in Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland and two each in California, Ohio, Florida and Texas.

 

Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC (the “Gestamp JV”) is a 50%-owned joint venture with Gestamp Wind Steel U.S., Inc., that was formed with a focus on producing towers for wind turbines being constructed in the North American market. The Gestamp JV announced plans to construct its initial production facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming; however, dueDue to the volatile political environment in the United States, particularly in regards to the Federal Production Tax Credit, constructionthe Company is in the processing of dissolving this facility has been placed on hold.joint venture.

Samuel Steel Pickling Company (“Samuel”), a 31.25%-owned joint venture with Samuel Manu-Tech Pickling, operates one steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and another in Cleveland, Ohio. Samuel also performs in-line slitting, side trimming, pickle dry, under winding and the application of dry lube coatings during the pickling process.

 

Serviacero Planos, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Serviacero Worthington”), a 50%-owned joint venture with Inverzer, S.A. de C.V., operates three facilities in Mexico, one each in Leon, Queretaro and Monterrey. Serviacero Worthington provides steel processing services such as pickling, slitting, multi-blanking and cutting-to-length to customers in a variety of industries including automotive, appliance, electronics and heavy equipment. Serviacero Worthington plans to commission itscommissioned a new pickle line in Monterrey during the late summer of calendar 2012.

 

TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”), a 45%-owned joint venture with ThyssenKrupp Steel North America, Inc., is a leading North American supplier of tailor welded blanks, tailor welded coils and other laser-weldedtailor welded products. TWB produces laser-weldedtailor welded products for use primarily in the automotive industry for products such as inner-door panels, body sides, rails and pillars.pillars, etc. TWB operates facilities in Monroe, Michigan; and Prattville, Alabama; and Smyrna, Tennessee as well as in Puebla, Ramos Arizpe (Saltillo), Hermosillo, and Hermosillo,Silao, Mexico.

 

Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”), a 50%-owned joint venture with Armstrong Ventures, Inc., a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., is one of the three largest global manufacturers of ceiling suspension systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings used in commercial and residential ceiling markets. It competes with the two other global manufacturers and numerous smaller manufacturers. WAVE operates eight facilities in six countries: Aberdeen, Maryland; Benton Harbor, Michigan; and North Las Vegas, Nevada, within the United States; Shanghai, the Peoples Republic of China; Team Valley, United Kingdom; Prouvy, France; Marval, Pune, India; and Madrid, Spain.

suspension systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings used in commercial and residential ceiling markets. It competes with the two other global manufacturers and numerous smaller manufacturers. WAVE operates nine facilities in six countries: Aberdeen, Maryland; Benton Harbor, Michigan; and North Las Vegas, Nevada, within the United States; Qingpu, Shanghai, the Peoples Republic of China; Sittingbourne and Team Valley, United Kingdom; Prouvy, France; Marval, Pune, India; and Madrid, Spain.

 

Worthington Modern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co., Ltd., a 40%-owned joint venture with China-based Hubei Modern Urban Construction & Development Group Co. Ltd., designs, manufactures, assembles and distributes steel framing materials for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and also provides related project management and building design and construction supply services. This joint venture operates one facility located in Xiantao City, Hubei Province, China.

 

Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”), a 51%-owned joint venture with a subsidiary of U.S. Steel, operates three steel processing facilities located in Canton, Jackson and Taylor, Michigan, which are managed by Worthington Steel. WSP serves primarily as a toll processor for U.S. Steel and others. Its services include slitting, blanking, cutting-to-length, laser welding, tension leveling and warehousing. WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

See “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” for additional information about our unconsolidated joint ventures.

Environmental Regulation

Our manufacturing facilities, generally in common with those of similar industries making similar products, are subject to many federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. We continually examine ways to reduce emissions and waste and to decrease costs related to environmental compliance. The cost of compliance or capital expenditures for environmental control facilities required to meet environmental requirements are not anticipated to be material when compared with overall costs and capital expenditures and, accordingly, are not anticipated to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or the competitive position of Worthington or any particular segment.

Item 1A. — Risk Factors

Future results and the market price for Worthington Industries’ common shares are subject to numerous risks, many of which are driven by factors that cannot be controlled or predicted. The following discussion, as well as other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “PART II—Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” describe certain business risks. Consideration should be given to the risk factors described below as well as those in the Safe Harbor Statement at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in conjunction with reviewing the forward-looking statements and other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks are not the only risks we face. Our business operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial in our operations.

Economic or Industry Downturns

The global recession that began in 2008 adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our business and our industries, as well as the industries and businesses of many of our customers and suppliers.    The volatile domestic and global recessionary climate had significant negative impacts on our business. The global recession, and the sluggish pace of the recovery, from the global recession, resulted in a significant decrease in customer demand throughout nearly all of our markets, including our largest market — automotive.

The impacts of the slow and uneven recovery in customer demand in many of our markets and government measures to aid economic recovery, including various measures intended to provide stimulus to the economy in general or to certain industries, as well as the growing debt levels of the United States and other countries, especially in Europe, continue to be unknown. Overall, operating levels across many of our businesses may remain at lower levels until economic conditions improve and demand increases. While certain sectors of the economy have stabilized and recovered from the economic downturn, we are unable to predict the strength, pace or sustainability of the economic recovery or the effects of government intervention or debt levels. Overall general economic conditions, both domestically and globally, have improved from the lows reached during the recession. The automotive market has shown signs of strengthening, and the construction market has shown signs of stabilizing. However, global economic conditions, particularly in Europe, remain fragile, and the possibility remains that the domestic or global economies, or certain industry sectors of those economies that are key to our sales, may continue to be slow or could further deteriorate, which could result in a corresponding decrease in demand for our products and negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

The automotive and construction industries account for a significant portion of our net sales, and reduced demand from these industries have adversely impacted and may continue to adversely affect our business.    The overall downturn in the economy, the disruption in capital and credit markets, declining real estate values, high unemployment rates, and reduced consumer confidence and spending caused significant reductions in demand from our end markets in general and, in particular, the automotive and construction end markets. The domestic autoautomotive industry has improved from its lows in recent years, but it continues to experience a difficult operating environment, which has resulted in and may continue to result in lower levels of vehicle production and an associated decrease in demand for products sold to the automotive industry. The construction industry has shown signs of stabilizing from further erosion. Many automotive manufacturers and their suppliers have reduced production levels and eliminated manufacturing capacity, through the closure of facilities, reduction in operations and other cost reduction actions. The construction industry has shown signs of stabilizing from further erosion. However, both the automotive and construction markets remain depressed compared to historical norms, and we cannot predict the strength, pace or sustainability of recovery in these markets. The difficulties faced by the automotive and construction industries have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our business. If demand for the products we sell to the automotive or construction markets were to be further reduced, this could negatively affect our sales, financial results and cash flows.

Financial difficulties and bankruptcy filings by our customers could have an adverse impact on our business.    ManyIn recent years, many of our customers have experienced and continue to experience challenging financial conditions. General Motors and Chrysler are recovering from bankruptcy proceedings, although both companies implemented plans which significantly reduced their production capacity and dealership networks. Certain other customers also filed bankruptcy petitions. These and other customers may be in need of additional capital or credit to continue operations. The bankruptcies and financial difficulties of certain customers and/or their failure to obtain credit or otherwise improve their overall financial condition could result in numerous changes within the markets we serve, including additional plant closings, decreased production, reduced demand, changes in product mix, unfavorable changes in the prices, terms or conditions we are able to obtain and other changes that may result in decreased purchases from us and otherwise negatively impact our business. These conditions also increase the risk that our customers may delay or default on their payment obligations to us, particularly customers in hard hit industries such as automotive and construction.us. The relative weakness of the economy continues the risk that some of our customers have further financial difficulties. Economic conditions remain fragile, and the possibility remains that markets may not fully recover, or could further deteriorate. Should the economy or any of our markets not improve, the risk of bankruptcy filings by and financial difficulties of our customers may increase. Such bankruptcy filings or other financial difficulties may result not only in a reduction in our sales, but also in a loss associated with our potential inability to collect outstanding accounts receivable from the affected customers. While we have taken and will continue to take steps intended to mitigate the impact of financial difficulties and potential bankruptcy filings by our customers, these matters could have a negative impact on our business.

Volatility in the United States and worldwide capital and credit markets has significantly impacted and may continue to significantly impact our end markets and has resulted and may continue to result in negative impacts on demand, increased credit and collection risks and other adverse effects on our business.    The domestic and

worldwide capital and credit markets, especially those in Europe, have experienced significant volatility, disruptions and dislocations with respect to price and credit availability. These factors have caused diminished availability of credit and other capital in our end markets, including automotive and construction, and for participants in, and the customers of, those markets.

ThereAlthough domestic credit markets have largely stabilized from the height of the financial crisis, the effects of the financial crisis continue to present additional risks to us, our customers and suppliers. In particular, there is continued uncertainty particularlyno guarantee that the credit markets or liquidity will not once again be restricted. Additionally, stricter lending standards have made it more difficult and costly for some firms to access the credit markets. In addition, uncertainties in Europe asregarding the financial sector and sovereign debt and the potential impact on banks in other regions of the world will continue to weigh on global and domestic growth. Although we believe we have adequate access to several sources of contractually committed borrowings and other available credit facilities, these risks could temporarily restrict our ability to borrow money on acceptable terms in the credit markets and potentially could affect our ability to draw on our credit facility. In addition, restricted access to the sustainability of the recovery of the capital and credit markets. Further volatility in the United States or worldwide capital and credit markets may significantly impactis also continuing to make it difficult, or in some cases, impossible for our key end markets and resultcustomers to borrow money to fund their operations. Lack of, or limited access to, capital would adversely affect our customers’ ability to purchase our products or, in further reductions in sales volumes, increased credit and collection risks and other adverse effectssome cases, to pay for our products on our business.a timely basis.

Raw Material Pricing and Availability

The costs of manufacturing our products and our ability to supply our customers could be negatively impacted if we experience interruptions in deliveries of needed raw materials or supplies.    If, for any reason, our supply of flat-rolled steel or other key raw materials, such as aluminum, zinc or helium, is curtailed or we are otherwise unable to obtain the quantities we need at competitive prices, our business could suffer and our financial results could be adversely affected. Such interruptions could result from a number of factors, including a shortage of capacity in the supplier base of raw materials, energy or the inputs needed to make steel or other supplies, a failure of suppliers to fulfill their supply or delivery obligations, financial difficulties of suppliers resulting in the closing or idling of supplier facilities, other significant events affecting supplier facilities, significant weather events, those factors listed in the immediately following paragraph or other factors beyond our control. Further, the number of suppliers has decreased in recent years due to industry consolidation and the financial difficulties of certain suppliers, and this consolidation may continue. Accordingly, if delivery from a major supplier is disrupted, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternative supply than in the past.

Our future operating results may be affected by fluctuations in raw material prices, and we may be unable to pass on any increases in raw material costs to our customers.    Our principal raw material is flat-rolled steel, which we purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole has been cyclical, and

at times availability and pricing can be volatile due to a number of factors beyond our control.Thesecontrol. These factors include general economic conditions, domestic and worldwide demand, the influence of hedge funds and other investment funds participating in commodity markets, curtailed production from major suppliers due to factors such as the closing or idling of facilities, accidents or equipment breakdowns, repairs or catastrophic events, labor costs or problems, competition, new laws and regulations, import duties, tariffs, energy costs, availability and cost of steel inputs (e.g., ore, scrap, coke and energy), currency exchange rates and other factors described in the immediately preceding paragraph. This volatility, as well as any increases in raw material costs, could significantly affect our steel costs and adversely impact our financial results. If our suppliers increase the prices of our critical raw materials, we may not have alternative sources of supply. In addition, in an environment of increasing prices for steel and other raw materials, competitive conditions may impact how much of the price increases we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are unable to pass on future price increases in our raw materials to our customers, our financial results could be adversely affected. Also, if steel prices decrease, competitive conditions may impact how quickly we must reduce our prices to our customers, and we could be forced to use higher-priced raw materials to complete orders for which the selling prices have decreased. Decreasing steel prices could also require us to write-down the value of our inventory to reflect current market pricing.

Inventories

Our business could be harmed if we fail to maintain proper inventory levels.    We are required to maintain sufficient inventories to accommodate the needs of our customers including, in many cases, short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements. Although we typically have customer orders in hand prior to placement of our raw material orders for Steel Processing, we anticipate and forecast customer demand for each of our operating segments. We purchase raw materials on a regular basis in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe are sufficient to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon orders, customer volume expectations, historic buying practices and market conditions. Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in the use of higher-priced inventory to fill orders reflecting lower selling prices, if steel prices have significantly decreased. These events could adversely affect our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate demand for our products or if our suppliers fail to supply quality products in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages could result in unfilled orders, negatively impacting our customer relationships and resulting in lost revenues, which could harm our business and adversely affect our financial results.

Suppliers and Customers

The loss of significant volume from our key customers could adversely affect us.    In fiscal 2012, our largest customer accounted for approximately 5% of our consolidated net sales, and our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 24% of our consolidated net sales.    A significant loss of, or decrease in, business from any of our key customers could have an adverse effect on our sales and financial results if we cannot obtain replacement business. Also, due to consolidation in the industries we serve, including the construction, automotive and retail industries, our sales may be increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse developments with respect to, one or more of our top customers. In addition, certain of our top customers may be able to exert pricing and other influences on us, requiring us to market, deliver and promote our products in a manner that may be more costly to us. Moreover, we generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, although our customers periodically provide indications of their product needs and purchases, they generally purchase our products on an order-by-order basis, and the relationship, as well as particular orders, can be terminated at any time.

Many of our key industries, such as constructionautomotive and automotive,construction, are cyclical in nature.    Many of our key industries, such as automotive and construction, are cyclical and can be impacted by both market demand and raw material supply, particularly with respect to steel. The demand for our products is directly related to,

and quickly impacted by, customer demand in our industries, which can change as the result of changes in the general United States or worldwide economy and other factors beyond our control. Adverse changes in demand or pricing can have a negative effect on our business.

Significant reductions in sales reductions forto any of the Detroit Three automakers could have a negative impact on our business.    Approximately half of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment and a significant amount of the net sales of certain joint ventures are to automotive-related customers. Although we do sell to the domestic operations of foreign automakers and their suppliers, a significant portion of our automotive sales are to Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler (the “Detroit Three automakers”) and their suppliers. A reduction in sales for any of the Detroit Three automakers could negatively impact our business. In addition, in 2011, automobile producers began taking steps toward complying with new Corporate Average Fuel Economy mileage requirements for new cars and light trucks that they produce. As automakers work to produce vehicles that comply with these new standards, they may reduce the amount of steel used in cars and trucks to improve fuel economy, thereby reducing demand for steel and resulting in further over-supply of steel in North America.

The closing or relocation of customer facilities could adversely affect us.    Our ability to meet delivery requirements and the overall cost of our products as delivered to customer facilities are important competitive factors. If customers close or move their production facilities further away from our manufacturing facilities

which can supply them, it could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet competitive conditions, which could result in the loss of sales. Likewise, if customers move their production facilities overseas, it could result in the loss of potential sales for us.

Sales conflicts with our customers and/or suppliers may adversely impact us.    In some instances, we may compete with one or more of our customers and/or suppliers in pursuing the same business. In addition, in the Engineered Cabs business, our customers often have the option of producing certain cabs in-house instead of having them supplied by us or our competition. To the extent they elect to produce such cabs in-house, it could adversely affect our sales. Such conflicts may strain our relationships with those parties, which could adversely affect our future business with them.

The closing or idling of steel manufacturing facilities could have a negative impact on us.    As steel makers have reduced their production capacities by closing or idling production lines in light of the challenging economic conditions, the number of facilities from which we can purchase steel, in particular certain specialty steels, has decreased. Accordingly, if delivery from a supplier is disrupted, particularly with respect to certain types of specialty steel, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternate supply than in the past. These closures and disruptions could also have an adverse effect on our suppliers’ on-time delivery performance, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our own delivery commitments and may have other adverse effects on our business.

The loss of key supplier relationships could adversely affect us.    Over the years, our various manufacturing operations have developed relationships with certain steel and other suppliers which have been beneficial to us by providing more assured delivery and a more favorable all-in cost, which includes price and shipping costs. If any of those relationships were disrupted, it could have an adverse effect on delivery times and the overall cost and quality of our raw materials, which could have a negative impact on our business. In addition, we do not have long-term contracts with any of our suppliers. If, in the future, we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of steel and other products at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our traditional suppliers, we may be unable to obtain these products from alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedule,schedules, which could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations.

Competition

Our business is highly competitive, and increased competition could negatively impact our financial results.    Generally, the markets in which we conduct business are highly competitive. Our competitors include a variety of both domestic and foreign companies in all major markets. Competition for most of our products is primarily on the basis of price, product quality and our ability to meet delivery requirements.

Depending on a variety of factors, including raw material, energy, labor and capital costs, government control of currency exchange rates and government subsidies of foreign steel producers, our business may be materially adversely affected by competitive forces. The economic recession has also resulted in significant open capacity, which could attract increased competitive presence. Competition may also increase if suppliers to or customers of our industries begin to more directly compete with our businesses through new facilities, acquisitions or otherwise. As noted above, we can have conflicts with our customers or suppliers and, in some cases, supply the same products and services as we do. Increased competition could cause us to lose market share, increase expenditures, lower our margins or offer additional services at a higher cost to us, which could adversely impact our financial results.

Sales by competitors of light gauge metal framing products which are not code compliant could adversely affect us.    Our unconsolidated metal framing joint venture, ClarkDietrich, is an industry leader in driving code compliance for light gauge metal framing. If our competitors offer cheaper products which are not code compliant, and certain customers are willing to purchase such non-compliant products, it may be difficult for ClarkDietrich to be cost competitive on these sales.

Material Substitution

If steel prices increase compared to certain substitute materials, the demand for our products could be negatively impacted, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.    In certain applications, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum (particularly in the automobile industry), cement and wood (particularly in the construction industry), composites, glass and plastic.Pricesplastic. Prices of all of these materials

fluctuate widely, and differences between the prices of these materials and the price of steel may adversely affect demand for our products and/or encourage material substitution, which could adversely affect prices and demand for steel products. The high cost of steel relative to other materials may make material substitution more attractive for certain uses.

Freight and Energy

Increasing energyfreight and freightenergy costs could increase our operating costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.    The availability and cost of freight and energy, such as electricity, natural gas and diesel fuel, is important in the manufacture and transport of our products.Ourproducts. Our operations consume substantial amounts of energy, and our operating costs generally increase when energy costs rise. Factors that may affect our energy costs include significant increases in fuel, oil or natural gas prices, unavailability of electrical power or other energy sources due to droughts, hurricanes or other natural causes or due to shortages resulting from insufficient supplies to serve customers, or interruptions in energy supplies due to equipment failure or other causes. During periods of increasing energy and freight costs, we may be unable to fully recover our operating cost increases through price increases without reducing demand for our products. Our financial results could be adversely affected if we are unable to pass all of the increases on to our customers or if we are unable to obtain the necessary freight and energy. Also, increasing energy costs could put a strain on the transportation of our materials and products if the increased costs force certain transporters to close.

Information Systems

We are subject to information system security risks and systems integration issues that could disrupt our internal operations.    We are dependent upon information technology for the distribution of information internally and also to our customers and suppliers. This information technology is subject to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches and defects in design. We could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded business management systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into operations. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information system and network disruptions and to prevent attempts to gain unauthorized access through the Internet to our information systems. However, a system failure could negatively impact our operations and financial results. In addition, cyber attacks could threaten the integrity of our trade secrets and sensitive intellectual property.

Business Disruptions

Disruptions to our business or the business of our customers or suppliers could adversely impact our operations and financial results.    Business disruptions, including increased costs for, or interruptions in, the supply of energy or raw materials, resulting from shortages of supply or transportation, severe weather events (such as hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, tornados, floods and blizzards), casualty events (such as explosions, fires or material equipment breakdown), acts of terrorism, pandemic disease, labor disruptions, the idling of facilities due to reduced demand (such as resulting(resulting from the recenta downturn in economic downturn)activity or otherwise) or other events (such as required maintenance shutdowns), could cause interruptions to our businesses as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers. While we maintain insurance coverage that can offset some losses relating to certain types of these events, losses from business disruptions could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results and we could be adversely impacted to the extent any such losses are not covered by insurance or cause some other adverse impact to us.

Foreign Operations

Economic, political and other risks associated with foreign operations could adversely affect our international financial results.    Although the substantial majority of our business activity takes place in the United States, we derive a portion of our revenues and earnings from operations in foreign countries, and we are subject to

risks associated with doing business internationally. We have wholly-owned facilities in Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Poland and Portugal and joint venture facilities in China, France, India, Mexico, Spain and the United Kingdom, and are active in exploring other foreign opportunities. The risks of doing business in foreign countries include, among other factors: the potential for adverse changes in the local political climate, in diplomatic relations between foreign countries and the United States or in government policies, laws or regulations; terrorist activity that may cause social disruption; logistical and communications challenges; costs of complying with a variety of laws and regulations; difficulty in staffing and managing geographically diverse operations; deterioration of foreign economic conditions, especially within Europe; inflation and fluctuations in interest rates; currency rate fluctuations; foreign exchange restrictions; differing local business practices and cultural considerations; restrictions on imports and exports or sources of supply, including energy and raw materials; changes in duties, quotas, tariffs, taxes or other protectionist measures; and potential issues related to matters covered by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar laws. We believe that our business activities outside of the United States involve a higher degree of risk than our domestic activities, and any one or more of these factors could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. In addition, the global recession and the volatility of worldwide capital and credit markets have significantly impacted and may continue to significantly impact our foreign customers and markets. These factors have resulted in decreased demand in our foreign operations and have had significant negative impacts on our business. Refer to theEconomic or Industry Downturns risk factor herein for additional information concerning the impact of the global recession and the volatility of capital and credit markets on our business.

Joint Ventures

A change in the relationship between the members of any of our joint ventures may have an adverse effect on that joint venture.    We have been successful in the development and operation of various joint ventures, and our equity in net income from our joint ventures, particularly WAVE, has been important to our financial results. We believe an important element in the success of any joint venture is a solid relationship between the members of that joint venture. If there is a change in ownership, a change of control, a change in management or management philosophy, a change in business strategy or another event with respect to a member of a joint venture that adversely impacts the relationship between the joint venture members, it could adversely impact that joint venture. In addition, joint ventures necessarily involve special risks. Whether or not we hold a majority interest or maintain operational control in a joint venture, our partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our interests or goals. For example, our partners may exercise veto rights to block actions that we believe to be in our best interests, may take action contrary to our policies or objects with respect to our investments, or may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations or commitments to the joint venture.

Acquisitions

We may be unable to successfully consummate, manage or integrate our acquisitions.    A portion of our growth has occurred through acquisitions. We may from time to time continue to seek attractive opportunities to acquire businesses, enter into joint ventures and make other investments that are complementary to our existing strengths. There are no assurances, however, that any acquisition opportunities will arise or, if they do, that they will be consummated, or that any needed additional financing for such opportunities will be available on satisfactory terms when required. In addition, acquisitions involve risks that the businesses acquired will not perform in accordance with expectations, that business judgments concerning the value, strengths and weaknesses of businesses acquired will prove incorrect, that we may assume unknown liabilities from the seller, that the acquired businesses may not be integrated successfully and that the acquisitions may strain our management resources or divert management’s attention from other business concerns. International acquisitions may present unique challenges and increase our exposure to the risks associated with foreign operations and countries. Failure to successfully integrate any of our acquisitions may cause significant operating inefficiencies and could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

Capital Expenditures

Our business requires capital investment and maintenance expenditures, and our capital resources may not be adequate to provide for all of our cash requirements.    Many of our operations are capital intensive. For the five-year period ended May 31, 2012,2013, our total capital expenditures, including acquisitions and investment activity, were approximately $637.3$759.8 million. Additionally, at May 31, 2012,2013, we were obligated to make aggregate lease payments of $27.5$29.9 million under operating lease agreements. Our business also requires expenditures for maintenance of our facilities. We currently believe that we have adequate resources (including cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities, availability under existing credit facilities and unused lines of credit) to meet our cash needs for normal operating costs, capital expenditures, debt repayments, dividend payments, future acquisitions and working capital for our existing business. However, given the current challenges, uncertainty and volatility in the domestic and global economies and financial markets, there can be no assurance that our capital resources will be adequate to provide for all of our cash requirements.

Litigation

We may be subject to legal proceedings or investigations, the resolution of which could negatively affect our results of operations and liquidity in a particular period.    Our results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be affected by an adverse ruling in any legal proceedings or investigations which may be pending against us or filed against us in the future. We are also subject to a variety of legal compliance risks, including, without limitation, potential claims relating to product liability, health and safety, environmental matters, intellectual property rights, taxes and compliance with U.S. and foreign export laws, anti-bribery laws, competition laws and sales and trading practices. While we believe that we have adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs to address and reduce these risks, the global and diverse nature of our operations means that these risks will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and contingencies may arise from time to time. A future adverse ruling or settlement or an unfavorable change in laws, rules or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or liquidity in a particular period. For additional information regarding our pending legal proceedings and contingencies, refer to “Part I—Item 3.—Legal Proceedings” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part II – Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Accounting and Tax Estimates

We are required to make accounting and tax-related estimates, assumptions and judgments in preparing our consolidated financial statements, and actual results may differ materially from the estimates, assumptions and

judgments that we use.    In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for and recognition of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions must be made because certain information that is used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is dependent on future events, or cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data available to us. In some cases, these estimates and assumptions are particularly difficult to determine and we must exercise significant judgment. TheSome of the estimates, assumptions and judgments having the greatest amount of uncertainty, subjectivity and complexity are related to our accounting for bad debts, returns and allowances, inventory, self-insurance reserves, derivatives, stock-based compensation, deferred tax assets and liabilities and asset impairments. Our actual results may differ materially from the estimates, assumptions and judgments that we use, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Tax Laws and Regulations

Tax increases or changes in tax laws could adversely affect our financial results.    We are subject to tax and related obligations in the jurisdictions in which we operate or do business, including state, local, federal and foreign taxes. The taxing rules of the various jurisdictions in which we operate or do business often are

complex and subject to varying interpretations. Tax authorities may challenge tax positions that we take or historically have taken, and may assess taxes where we have not made tax filings or may audit the tax filings we have made and assess additional taxes. Some of these assessments may be substantial, and also may involve the imposition of penalties and interest. In addition, governments could impose new taxes on us or increase the rates at which we are taxed in the future. The payment of substantial additional taxes, penalties or interest resulting from tax assessments, or the imposition of any new taxes, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, our provision for income taxes and cash tax liability in the future could be adversely affected by changes in U.S. tax laws. Potential changes that may adversely affect our financial results include, without limitation, decreasing the ability of U.S. companies to receive a tax credit for foreign taxes paid or to defer the U.S. deduction of expenses in connection with investments made in other countries.

Claims and Insurance

Adverse claims experience, to the extent not covered by insurance, may have an adverse effect on our financial results.    We self-insure a significant portion of our potential liability for workers’ compensation, product liability, general liability, property liability, automobile liability and employee medical claims. In order to reduce risk, we purchase insurance from highly-rated, licensed insurance carriers that cover most claims in excess of the applicable deductible or retained amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to resolve open claims as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. The occurrence of significant claims, our failure to adequately reserve for such claims, a significant cost increase to maintain our insurance or the failure of our insurance providers to perform could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Principal Shareholder

Our principal shareholder may have the ability to exert significant influence in matters requiring a shareholder vote and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Worthington Industries.    Pursuant to our charter documents, certain matters such as those in which a person would attempt to acquire or take control of the Company, must be approved by the vote of the holders of common shares representing at least 75% of Worthington Industries’ outstanding voting power. Approximately 25% of our outstanding common shares are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by John P. McConnell, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. As a result of his beneficial ownership of our common shares, Mr. McConnell may have the ability to exert significant influence in these matters and other proposals upon which our shareholders may vote.

Key Employees

If we lose our senior management or other key employees, our business may be adversely affected.    Our ability to successfully operate, grow our business and implement our business strategies is largely dependent on the efforts, abilities and services of our senior management and other key employees. The loss of any of these individuals or our inability to attract, train and retain additional personnel could reduce the competitiveness of our business or otherwise impair our operations or prospects. Our future success will also depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, such as engineers and other skilled technicians, who have experience in the application of our products and are knowledgeable about our business, markets and products. We cannot assure that we will be able to retain our existing senior management personnel or other key employees or attract additional qualified personnel when needed. We have not entered into any formal employment agreements or change in control agreements with our executive officers, and the loss of any member of our management team could adversely impact our business and operations. Additionally, we may modify our management structure from time to time or reduce our overall workforce as we did in certain operating segments during the recent economic downturn, which may create marketing, operational and other business risks.

Credit Ratings

Ratings agencies may downgrade our credit ratings, which could make it more difficult for us to raise capital and could increase our financing costs.    Any downgrade in our credit ratings may make raising capital more difficult, may increase the cost and affect the terms of future borrowings, may affect the terms under which we purchase goods and services and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. In addition, the interest rate on our revolving credit facility is tied to our credit ratings, and any downgrade of our credit ratings would likely result in an increase in the current cost of borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Difficult Financial Markets

Should we be required to raise capital in the future, we could face higher borrowing costs, less available capital, more stringent terms and tighter covenants or, in extreme conditions, an inability to raise capital.    Although we currently have significant borrowing availability under our existing credit facilities, should those facilities become unavailable due to covenant or other defaults, or should we otherwise be required to raise capital outside our existing facilities, given the current uncertainty and volatility in the U.S. and global credit and capital markets, our ability to access capital and the terms under which we do so may be negatively impacted. Any adverse change in our access to capital or the terms of our borrowings, including increased costs, could have a negative impact on our financial condition.

Environmental, Health and Safety

We may incur additional costs related to environmental and health and safety matters.    Our operations and facilities are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety. Failure to maintain or achieve compliance with these laws and regulations or with the permits required for our operations could result in increased costs and capital expenditures and potentially fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, cleanup costs or temporary or permanent discontinuance of operations. Over time, we and predecessor operators of our facilities have generated, used, handled and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. Environmental liabilities, including cleanup obligations, could exist at our facilities or at off-site locations where materials from our operations were disposed of or at facilities we have divested, which could result in future expenditures that cannot be currently quantified and which could reduce our profits and cash flow. We may be held strictly liable for any contamination of these sites, and the amount of any such liability could be material. Under the “joint and several” liability principle of certain

environmental laws, we may be held liable for all remediation costs at a particular site, even with respect to contamination for which we are not responsible. Changes in environmental and human health and safety laws, rules, regulations or enforcement policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Legislation and RegulationRegulations

Certain proposed legislation and regulations may have an adverse impact on the economy in general and in our markets specifically, which may adversely affect our business.    Our business may be negatively impacted by a variety of new or proposed legislation or regulations. For example, legislation and regulations proposing increases in taxation on, or heightened regulation of, carbon or other greenhouse gas emissions may result in higher prices for steel, higher prices for utilities required to run our facilities, higher fuel costs for us and our suppliers and distributors and other adverse impacts. See the immediately following risk factor for additional information regarding legislation and regulations concerning climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. To the extent that new legislation or regulations increase our costs, we may not be able to fully pass these costs on to our customers without a resulting decline in sales and adverse impact to our profits. Likewise, to the extent new legislation or regulations would have an adverse effect on the economy, our markets or the ability of domestic businesses to compete against foreign operations, it could also have an adverse impact on us.

Legislation or regulations concerning climate change and greenhouse gas emissions may negatively affect our results of operations.    Energy is a significant input in a number of our operations and products, and many believe that consumption of energy derived from fossil fuels is a contributor to global warming. A number of governments and governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating legislative and regulatory changes in response to the potential impacts of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. The European Union has established greenhouse gas regulations, and Canada has published details of a regulatory framework for greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued and proposed regulations addressing greenhouse gas emissions, including regulations which will require reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from large sources and suppliers in the United States. Legislation previously has been introduced in the U.S. Congress aimed at limiting carbon emissions from companies that conduct business that is carbon-intensive. Among other potential items, such bills could include a system of carbon emission credits issued to certain companies, similar to the European Union’s existing cap-and-trade system. Several U.S. states have also adopted, and other states may in the future adopt, legislation or regulations implementing state-wide or regional cap-and-trade systems that apply to some or all industries that emit greenhouse gases. It is impossible at this time to forecast what the final regulations and legislation, if any, will look like and the resulting effects on our business and operations. Depending upon the terms of any such regulations or legislation, however, we could suffer a negative financial impact as a result of increased energy, environmental and other costs necessary to comply with limitations on greenhouse gas emissions, and we may see changes in the margins of our greenhouse gas-intensive and energy-intensive assets. In addition, depending upon whether similar limitations are imposed globally, the regulations and legislation could negatively impact our ability to compete with foreign companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Many of our customers in the United States, Canada and Europe may experience similar impacts, which could result in decreased demand for our products.

Legislation, regulations or other events which could adversely affect the ability or cost to recover natural gas or oil may negatively affect our business.    In recent years, increasing amounts of oil and natural gas have been produced through the hydraulic fracking process throughout the United States and North America. This has resulted in decreasing energy costs, particularly for natural gas and similar energy products. This reduction has been a boon for the U.S. economy and has helped lower energy costs for U.S. businesses. Also, some of our recent acquisitions supply products which are used by companies engaged in hydraulic fracking. If legislation, regulations or other events limit the ability to recover such fuels through hydraulic fracking or increase the cost thereof, it could have a negative impact on our business, the U.S. economy and U.S. businesses in general, which could result in decreased demand for our products or otherwise negatively impact our business.

The implementation of the provisions of the new health care law could adversely affect our business.    As the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act begin to be fully implemented and governments and employers take action related thereto, the impact on U.S. health care costs are unknown. Many project that there will be a significant increase in health care costs which could adversely impact the U.S. economy and U.S. businesses which could result in a decreased demand for our products. Further, the Company’s health care costs could increase which would negatively impact our profits.

Seasonality

Our operations have been subject to seasonal fluctuations that may impact our cash flows for a particular period.    Sales are generally strongest in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year when all of our business segments are normally operating at seasonal peaks. Historically, our sales are generally weaker in the third quarter of the fiscal year, primarily due to reduced activity in the building and construction industry as a result of the colder, more inclement weather, as well as customer plant shutdowns in the automotive industry due to holidays. Our quarterly results may also be affected by the timing of large customer orders. Consequently,

our cash flow from operations may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. If, as a result of any such fluctuation, our quarterly cash flows were significantly reduced, we may be unable to service our

indebtedness or maintain compliance with certain covenants under our credit facilities. A default under any of the documents governing our indebtedness could prevent us from borrowing additional funds, limit our ability to pay interest or principal and allow our lenders to declare the amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and to exercise certain other remedies.

Impairment Charges

Continued or enhanced weakness or instability in the economy, our markets or our results of operations could result in future asset impairments, which would reduce our reported earnings and net worth.We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, excluding purchased goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Impairment testing involves a comparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings.recognized. For long-lived assets other than goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may be present. The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of each operating segment,reporting unit, determined using discounted cash flows, to each operating segment’sreporting unit’s respective carrying value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segmentreporting unit exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segmentreporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment is indicated. The amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the net assets of the operating segment,reporting unit, excluding goodwill, to its estimated fair value, with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is lower than its carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated statementsstatement of earnings. Economic conditions remain fragile, particularly in Europe and the possibility remains that the domestic or global economies, or certain industry sectors that are key to our sales, may deteriorate. If certain of our business segments are adversely affected by the challenging and volatile economic and financial conditions, we may be required to record additional impairments, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

Item 1B. — Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. — Properties.

General

Our principal corporate offices are located in an office building in Columbus, Ohio, containing approximately 117,700 square feet. This building alsofeet, which houses the principal corporate offices of the Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Global GroupConstruction Services operating segments. We reached an agreement to purchasepurchased this office building subsequenton June 22, 2012. Our Steel Processing corporate offices are located next to year-end.the corporate offices in a leased office building in Columbus, Ohio, containing approximately 30,000 square feet. We also own three facilities used for administrative and medical purposes in Columbus, Ohio, containing an aggregate of approximately 166,000 square feet. As of May 31, 2012,2013, we owned or leased a total of approximately 8,000,000 square feet of space for our operations, of which approximately 7,000,000 square feet (7,600,000 square feet with warehouses) was devoted to manufacturing, product distribution and sales offices. Major leases contain renewal options for periods of up to 10 years. For information concerning rental obligations, refer to “Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of

Financial Condition and Results of Operations –Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial CommitmentsCommitments” as well as “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to

Consolidated Financial Statements – Note QR – Operating Leases” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe the distribution and office facilities provide adequate space for our operations and are well maintained and suitable.

Excluding joint ventures, we operate 3536 manufacturing facilities and 12 warehouses. These manufacturing facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition, and are believed to be sufficient to meet current needs.

Steel Processing

Our Steel Processing operating segment operates 1011 manufacturing facilities, 910 of which are wholly-owned, containing a total of approximately 2,500,000 square feet, and one that is leased, containing approximately 150,000 square feet. These facilities are located in Alabama, California, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan (2), and Ohio (5). This operating segment also owns one warehouse in Ohio, containing approximately 110,000 square feet, one warehouse in Michigan, containing approximately 100,000 square feet, and one warehouse in California, containing approximately 60,000 square feet. As noted above, this operating segment’s corporate offices are located in Columbus, Ohio.

Pressure Cylinders

Our Pressure Cylinders operating segment operates 1517 manufacturing facilities, 1315 of which are wholly-owned, containing a total of approximately 1,800,0002,300,000 square feet, and two that are leased, containing approximately 350,000 square feet. These facilities are located in California, Kansas (2), Mississippi, North Carolina, New York, Ohio (3)(5), Wisconsin, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Poland (2) and Portugal. This operating segment also operates threetwo owned warehouses, one in Austria one in the Czech Republic and one in Poland, containing a total of approximately 200,00090,000 square feet, and three leased warehouses, two in Ohio and one in Canada, containing a total of approximately 130,000 square feet. As noted above, this operating segment’s corporate offices are located in Columbus, Ohio.

Engineered Cabs

Our Engineered Cabs operating segment operates four owned manufacturing facilities containing a total of approximately 600,0001,000,000 square feet. These facilities are located in Iowa, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee. This operating segment also operates one owned warehouse in TennesseeIowa and one leased warehouse in IowaTennessee containing a total of approximately 20,000 square feet. This operating segment’s corporate offices are located in Watertown, South Dakota.

Other

Steel Packaging operates three facilities, one each in Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The manufacturing facilities in Indiana and Pennsylvania are leased and contain a total of approximately 290,000175,000 square feet; and the facility located in Ohio is owned and contains approximately 21,000 square feet. Global GroupThe Construction Services operating segment, which includes Mid-Rise Construction and Military Construction and Commercial Stairs business units, operateoperates manufacturing facilities in Ohio (2) and Tennessee containing approximately 220,000 square feet and leaseleases approximately 18,300 square feet for administrative offices in Hawaii and Ohio. Additionally, we retained Gerstenslager’s manufacturing facility in Wooster, Ohio, which is subject to a lease agreement with ArtiFlex and contains approximately 900,000 square feet.

Joint Ventures

The Spartan consolidated joint venture owns and operates one manufacturing facility in Michigan, the PSI Energy SolutionsWEI joint venture operatesleases one manufacturing facility in Fremont, Ohio, and the WNCL

consolidated joint venture owns and operates a manufacturing facility in India. The unconsolidated joint ventures operate a total of 4147 manufacturing facilities, located in Alabama, California (2), Connecticut, Florida (2), Georgia, Hawaii,

Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland (2), Michigan (7)(9), Nevada, Ohio (6)(7), Tennessee, and Texas (2) domestically, and in China (2), France, India (2), Mexico (6)(7), Spain and the United Kingdom (2), internationally.

Item 3. — Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various judicial and administrative proceedings as both plaintiff and defendant, arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that any such proceedings (including matters related to contracts, torts, taxes, warranties and insurance) will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

Notwithstanding the statement above, refer to “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding certain litigation which remained pending during fiscal 2012.

Item 4. — Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Supplemental Item — Executive Officers of the Registrant

Effective August 1, 2012, George P. Stoe will be retiring from his position as President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries and will continue serving the Company as Director of International Business Development and Non-Executive Chairman of Angus–Palm. Mark A. Russell, currently President of The Worthington Steel Company, will succeed Mr. Stoe as President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries effective August 1, 2012; and Geoffrey G. Gilmore, currently Vice President-Purchasing of Worthington Industries, will succeed Mr. Russell as President of The Worthington Steel Company effective August 1, 2012.

The following table lists the names, positions held and ages of the individuals serving as executive officers of the Registrant as of July 30, 2012 and those individuals who will become executive officers effective August 1, 2012.2013.

 

Name

  Age   

Position(s) with the Registrant

  Present Office
Held Since
   Age   

Position(s) with the Registrant

  Present Office
Held Since
 

John P. McConnell

   58    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; a Director   1996     59    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; a Director   1996  

George P. Stoe

   66    President and Chief Operating Officer   2008  

Mark A. Russell

   50    President and Chief Operating Officer   2012  

B. Andrew Rose

   42    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   2008     43    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   2008  

Mark A. Russell

   49    President, The Worthington Steel Company   2007  

Dale T. Brinkman

   59    Vice President-Administration, General Counsel and Secretary   2000     60    Vice President-Administration, General Counsel and Secretary   2000  

Terry M. Dyer

   45    Vice President-Human Resources   2012  

Andrew J. Billman

   44    President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation   2011  

Terry M. Dyer

Andrew J. Billman

   

 

46

45

  

  

  

Vice President-Human Resources

President-Worthington Cylinder Corporation

   

 

2012

2011

  

  

Geoffrey G. Gilmore

   40    Vice President-Purchasing   2011     41    President-The Worthington Steel Company   2012  

Matthew A. Lockard

   43    Vice President-Corporate Development and Treasurer   2009     44    Vice President-Corporate Development and Treasurer   2009  

Catherine M. Lyttle

   53    Vice President-Communications and Investor Relations   2009     54    Vice President-Communications and Investor Relations   2009  

Eric M. Smolenski

   42    Chief Information Officer   2012     43    Chief Information Officer   2012  

Richard G. Welch

   54    Controller   2000     55    Controller   2000  

Virgil L. Winland

   64    Senior Vice President-Manufacturing   2001     65    Senior Vice President-Manufacturing   2001  

John P. McConnell has served as Worthington Industries’ Chief Executive Officer since June 1993, as a director of Worthington Industries continuously since 1990, and as Chairman of the Board of Worthington Industries since September 1996. Mr. McConnell serves as the Chair of the Executive Committee of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors. He served in various positions with the Company from 1975 to June 1993.

George P. StoeMark A. Russell has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries since October 2008 and will continue to serve in these positions until July 31, 2012. Effective August 1, 2012, Mr. Stoe will retire as President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries and will become the Company’s Director of International Business Development and Non-Executive Chairman of Angus–Palm. Mr. Stoe served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries from December 2005 to October 2008. He previously served as President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation from January 2003 to December 2005.

Mark A. Russell was appointed to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer of Worthington Industries effective August 1, 2012. From February 2007 to July 31, 2012, Mr. Russell has served as President of The Worthington Steel Company since February 2007.Company. From August 2004 throughuntil February 2007, Mr. Russell was a partner in Russell & Associates, an acquisition group formed to acquire aluminum products companies.

B. Andrew ‘Andy’ Rose has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Worthington Industries since December 2008. From 2007 to 2008, he served as a senior investment professional with MCG Capital Corporation, a private equity firm specializing in investments in middle market companies; and from 2002 to 2007, he was a founding partner at Peachtree Equity Partners, L.P., a private equity firm backed by Goldman Sachs.

Dale T. Brinkman has served as Worthington Industries’ Vice President-Administration since December 1998 and as Worthington Industries’ General Counsel since September 1982. He has been Secretary of Worthington Industries since September 2000 and served as Assistant Secretary of Worthington Industries from September 1982 to September 2000.

Terry M. Dyer has served as Vice President-Human Resources of Worthington Industries since June 4, 2012. From October 2009 to June 2012, he served as the Vice President-Human Resources for our WAVE joint venture in Malvern, Pennsylvania. Mr. Dyer served as Senior Human Resources Generalist for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (“Armstrong”) from November 2004 to October 2009. Armstrong is a global leader in the design and manufacture of floors, ceilings and cabinets.

Andrew J. Billman has served as President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation since August 2011. From February 2010 to August 2011, he served as Vice President-Purchasing for Worthington Industries. He served as Regional Sales Manager of The Worthington Steel Company from August 2008 to January 2010 and as National Account Manager from August 2006 to July 2008. Mr. Billman served as Automotive Accounts Manager of The Worthington Steel Company from August 1998 to December 2000; and in various other positions with the Company from 1991 to February 2010.January 2001. From January 2001 to July 2006, he was employed with A.M.S.E.A., Inc., a private manufacturing company that stamped components, located in Michigan.

Geoffrey G. Gilmore was appointed to the position ofhas served as President of The Worthington Steel Company effectivesince August 1, 2012. SinceFrom July 2011 to July 2012, he has served as Vice President-Purchasing for Worthington Industries responsible for all purchasing efforts across the Company including steel, commodity and OEM purchasing, logistics and outside processing. From MarchApril 2010 to July 2011, he served as General Manager of The Worthington Steel Company’s Delta, Ohio facility, responsible for overseeing its manufacturing and sales operations; and from June 2006 to MarchFebruary 2010, he served as Director of automotive salesAutomotive Sales for The Worthington Steel Company. Mr. Gilmore served in various other positions with the Company from 1998 to June 2006.

Matthew A. Lockard has served as Treasurer of Worthington Industries since February 2009 and as Vice President-Corporate Development of Worthington Industries since July 2005. From April 2001 to July 2005, Mr. Lockardhe served as Vice President-Global Business Development for Worthington Cylinder Corporation. Mr. Lockard served in various other positions with the Company from January 1994 to April 2001.

CathyCatherine M. Lyttle has served as Vice President of Communications and Investor Relations of Worthington Industries since April 2009. Ms. Lyttle hasShe served as Vice President of Communications sinceof Worthington Industries from January 1999. She1999 to April 2009. Ms. Lyttle served as Vice President of Marketing for the Columbus Chamber of Commerce from 1987 to September 1997 and as Vice President of JMAC Hockey from 1997 to 1999.

Eric M. Smolenski was appointed to the position ofhas served as Chief Information Officer of Worthington Industries effectivesince June 2012. Mr. SmolenskiHe served as Vice President-Human Resources of Worthington Industries from December 2005 through June 2012. From January 2001 to December 2005, Mr. Smolenski served as the Director of Corporate Human Resources Services of Worthington Industries, and he served in various other positions with the Company from January 1994 to January 2001.

Richard G. Welch has served as the Corporate Controller of Worthington Industries since March 2000 and prior thereto, he served as Assistant Controller of Worthington Industries from August 1999 to March 2000. He served as Principal Financial Officer of Worthington Industries on an interim basis from September 2008 to December 2008.

Virgil L. Winland has served as Senior Vice President-Manufacturing of Worthington Industries since January 2001. He served in various other positions with the Company from 1971 to January 2001, including President of Worthington Cylinder Corporation from June 1998 through January 2001.

Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the directors of the Registrant. There are no family relationships among any of the Registrant’s executive officers or directors. No arrangements or understandings exist pursuant to which any individual has been, or is to be, selected as an executive officer of the Registrant.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Common Shares Information

The common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. (“Worthington Industries”) trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WOR” and are listed in most newspapers as “WorthgtnInd.” As of July 25, 2012,22, 2013, Worthington Industries had 6,6686,355 registered shareholders. The following table sets forth (i) the low and high closing prices and the closing price per share for Worthington Industries’ common shares for each quarter of fiscal 20112012 and fiscal 2012,2013, and (ii) the cash dividends per share declared on Worthington Industries’ common shares for each quarter of fiscal 20112012 and fiscal 2012.2013.

 

   Market Price   Cash
Dividends

    Declared   
 
      Low         High         Closing      

Fiscal 2011

Quarter Ended

                

August 31, 2010

  $12.05    $15.36    $14.22    $0.10  

November 30, 2010

  $14.63    $16.59    $16.02    $0.10  

February 28, 2011

  $16.44    $20.00    $19.36    $0.10  

May 31, 2011

  $18.30    $21.83    $21.83    $0.10  

Fiscal 2012

Quarter Ended

                

August 31, 2011

  $14.98    $23.45    $16.25    $0.12  

November 30, 2011

  $13.21    $18.68    $17.59    $0.12  

February 29, 2012

  $15.58    $19.24    $16.87    $0.12  

May 31, 2012

  $16.25    $19.75    $16.25    $0.12  
   Market Price   Cash
Dividends
   Declared   
 
      Low         High         Closing      

Fiscal 2012 

Quarter Ended

                

August 31, 2011

  $14.98   $23.45   $16.25   $0.12 

November 30, 2011

  $13.21   $18.68   $17.59   $0.12 

February 29, 2012

  $15.58   $19.24   $16.87   $0.12 

May 31, 2012

  $16.25   $19.75   $16.25   $0.12 

Fiscal 2013

Quarter Ended

                

August 31, 2012

  $15.88   $23.16   $20.90   $0.13 

November 30, 2012

  $20.86   $24.27   $23.56   $0.13 

February 28, 2013

  $22.93   $29.10   $28.34   $0.26 

May 31, 2013

  $28.02   $35.59   $34.38   $- 

Dividends are declared at the discretion of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors. Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.10 per common share in fiscal 2011 and of $0.12 per common share in fiscal 2012 and of $0.13 per common share for the first and second quarters in fiscal 2013. On December 10, 2012, the Board declared an accelerated third and fourth quarter cash dividend totaling $0.26 per common share. The dividend was paid on December 28, 2012 to shareholders of record as of December 21, 2012. On June 27, 2012,26, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.13$0.15 per common share.share for the first quarter of fiscal 2014. This dividend is payable on September 28, 2012,27, 2013, to shareholders of record as of September 14, 2012.13, 2013.

The Board of Directors reviews the dividend on a quarterly basis and establishes the dividend rate based upon Worthington Industries’ financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, current and projected cash flows, business prospects and other factors which the directors may deem relevant. While Worthington Industries has paid a dividend every quarter since becoming a public company in 1968, there is no guarantee this will continue in the future.

Shareholder Return Performance

The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate such information into such a filing.

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative return on Worthington Industries’ common shares, the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at May 31, 2007,2008, in Worthington Industries’ common shares and each index.

 

 

*

$100 invested on 5/31/0708 in common shares or index. Assumes reinvestment of dividends when received. Fiscal year ended May 31.

 

  05/07   05/08   05/09   05/10   05/11   05/12   05/08   05/09   05/10   05/11   05/12   05/13 

Worthington Industries, Inc.

  $100.00    $97.78    $72.41    $78.38    $119.14    $91.06     100.00     74.06     80.17     121.84     93.13     202.36  

S&P Midcap 400 Index

  $100.00    $97.50    $64.84    $87.22    $115.97    $108.90     100.00     66.50     89.46     118.94     111.69     145.14  

S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index

  $100.00    $123.73    $49.38    $61.93    $73.29    $48.51     100.00     39.91     50.05     59.23     39.20     41.97  

Data and graph provided by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. Copyright© 2012,2013, Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Worthington Industries is a component of the S&P Midcap 400 Index. The S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index, of which Worthington Industries is also a component, is the most specific index relative to the largest line of business of Worthington Industries and its subsidiaries. At May 31, 2012,2013, the S&P 1500 Steel Composite Index included 139 steel related companies from the S&P 500, S&P Midcap 400 and S&P 600 indices: AK Steel Holding Corporation; Allegheny Technologies Incorporated; A.M. Castle & Co.; Carpenter Technology Corporation; Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.; Commercial Metals Company; Haynes International, Inc.; Nucor Corporation; Olympic Steel, Inc.; Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; United States Steel Corporation; and Worthington Industries.Industries, Inc.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about purchases made by, or on behalf of, Worthington Industries or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b – 18(a) (3) under the Exchange Act of 1934) of common shares of Worthington Industries during each month of the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2012:2013:

 

Period

  Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
per Common
Share
   Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
   Maximum Number
of Common Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

(1)
 

March 1-31, 2012

   -     -     -     7,236,732  

April 1-30, 2012

   -     -     -     7,236,732  

May 1-31, 2012

   1,208,900    $17.60     1,208,900     6,027,832  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   1,208,900    $17.60     1,208,900    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Period

  Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
per Common
Share
   Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
   Maximum Number
of Common Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

(1)
 

March 1-31, 2013

   5,692(2)  $31.04     -     6,027,832  

April 1-30, 2013

   325,000   $31.94     325,000     5,702,832  

May 1-31, 2013

   676,064(2)  $33.46     600,000     5,102,832  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   1,006,756   $32.96     925,000    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

(1)

The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of common shares that could be purchased under the publicly announced repurchase authorization then in effect. On June 29, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries’ outstanding common shares. A total of 6,027,8325,102,832 common shares were available under this repurchase authorization as of May 31, 2012.2013.

The common shares available for repurchase under the June 29, 2011 authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other appropriate factors. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

(2)

Includes an aggregate of 5,692 common shares and 76,064 common shares surrendered by employees in March and May 2013, respectively, to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted common shares. These common shares were not counted against the 10,000,000 share repurchase authorization in effect throughout fiscal 2013 and discussed in footnote (1) above.

Item 6. — Selected Financial Data

 

 Fiscal Year Ended May 31,  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 

FINANCIAL RESULTS

          

Net sales

 $2,534,701   $2,442,624   $1,943,034   $2,631,267   $3,067,161   $2,612,244  $2,534,701  $2,442,624  $1,943,034   $2,631,267 

Cost of goods sold

  2,201,833    2,086,467    1,663,104    2,456,533    2,711,414    2,215,601   2,201,833   2,086,467   1,663,104   2,456,533 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross margin

  332,868    356,157    279,930    174,734    355,747    396,643   332,868   356,157   279,930   174,734 

Selling, general and administrative expense

  225,069    235,198    218,315    210,046    231,602    258,324   225,069   235,198   218,315   210,046 

Impairment of long-lived assets

  355    4,386    35,409    96,943    -    6,488   355   4,386   35,409   96,943 

Restructuring and other expense

  5,984    2,653    4,243    43,041    18,111    3,293   5,984   2,653   4,243   43,041 

Joint venture transactions

  (150  (10,436  -    -    -    (604)  (150)  (10,436)  -   - 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  101,610    124,356    21,963    (175,296  106,034    129,142   101,610   124,356   21,963   (175,296)

Miscellaneous income (expense)

  2,319    597    1,127    (2,329  620    1,452   2,319   597   1,127   (2,329)

Gain on sale of investment in Aegis

  -    -    -    8,331    -    -    -    -    -   8,331 

Interest expense

  (19,497  (18,756  (9,534  (20,734  (21,452  (23,918)  (19,497)  (18,756)  (9,534)  (20,734)

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  92,825    76,333    64,601    48,589    67,459    94,624   92,825   76,333   64,601   48,589 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  177,257    182,530    78,157    (141,439  152,661    201,300   177,257   182,530   78,157   (141,439)

Income tax expense (benefit)

  51,904    58,496    26,650    (37,754  38,616    64,465   51,904   58,496   26,650   (37,754)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

  125,353    124,034    51,507    (103,685  114,045    136,835   125,353   124,034   51,507   (103,685)

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  9,758    8,968    6,266    4,529    6,968    393   9,758   8,968   6,266   4,529 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 $115,595   $115,066   $45,241   $(108,214 $107,077   $136,442  $115,595  $115,066  $45,241   $(108,214)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share—diluted:

          

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest

 $1.65   $1.53   $0.57   $(1.37 $1.31   $1.91  $1.65  $1.53  $0.57   $(1.37)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 $55,873   $61,058   $64,653   $64,073   $63,413   $66,469  $55,873  $61,058  $64,653   $64,073 

Capital expenditures (including acquisitions and investments)

  272,349    59,891    98,275    109,491    97,343    219,813   272,349   59,891   98,275   109,491 

Cash dividends declared

  33,441    29,411    31,676    48,115    54,640    36,471   33,441   29,411   31,676   48,115 

Per common share

 $0.48   $0.40   $0.40   $0.61   $0.68   $0.52  $0.48  $0.40  $0.40   $0.61 

Average common shares outstanding—diluted

  70,252    75,409    79,143    78,903    81,898  

Average common shares oustanding—diluted

  71,314   70,252   75,409   79,143   78,903 

FINANCIAL POSITION

          

Total current assets

 $914,239   $891,635   $782,285   $598,935   $1,104,970   $866,883  $914,239  $891,635  $782,285   $598,935 

Total current liabilities

  658,263    525,002    379,802    372,080    664,895    448,914   658,263   525,002   379,802   372,080 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Working capital

 $255,976   $366,633   $402,483   $226,855   $440,075   $417,969  $255,976  $366,633  $402,483   $226,855 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment, net

 $443,077   $405,334   $506,163   $521,505   $549,944   $459,430  $443,077  $405,334  $506,163   $521,505 

Total assets

  1,877,797    1,667,249    1,520,347    1,363,829    1,988,031    1,950,857   1,877,797   1,667,249   1,520,347   1,363,829 

Total debt

  533,714    383,210    250,238    239,393    380,450    521,056   533,714   383,210   250,238   239,393 

Total shareholders’ equity—controlling interest

  697,174    689,910    711,413    706,069    885,377    830,822   697,174   689,910   711,413   706,069 

Per share

 $10.27   $9.62   $8.98   $8.94   $11.16   $11.91  $10.27  $9.62  $8.98   $8.94 

Common shares outstanding

  67,906    71,684    79,217    78,998    79,308    69,752   67,906   71,684   79,217   78,998 

The acquisition of the net assets of Palmer Mfg. & Tank, Inc. has been reflected since April 2013. Our European air brake tank operations in Czech Republic have been excluded since their disposal in October 2012. The acquisition of the outstanding common shares of Westerman, Inc. has been reflected since September 2012. The acquisition of our 75% ownership interest in PSI Energy Solutions, LLC has been reflected since March

2012. The acquisition of the outstanding voting interests of Angus Industries, Inc. has been reflected since December 2011. The acquisition of the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company, Inc. has been reflected since December 2011. The acquisition of the outstanding voting interests of STAKO sp. Z o.o.

has been reflected since September 2011. The acquisition of substantially all of the net assets of the BernzOmatic business of Irwin Industrial Tool Company has been reflected since July 2011. Our Automotive Body Panels operations have been excluded from consolidated operating results since their deconsolidation in May 2011. Our Metal Framing operations have been excluded from consolidated operating results since their deconsolidation in March 2011, except for our Metal Framing operations in Canada, which have been excluded since their disposition in November 2009. The acquisition of the net assets of three MISA Metals, Inc. steel processing locations has been reflected since March 2011. The acquisition of our 60% ownership interest in Nitin Cylinders Limited has been reflected since December 2010. The acquisition of the net assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. has been reflected since June 2010. The acquisition of the steel processing assets of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries has been reflected since February 2010. The acquisition of the membership interests of Structural Composites Industries, LLC has been reflected since September 2009. The acquisition of the net assets related to the businesses of Piper Metal Forming Corporation, U.S. Respiratory, Inc. and Pacific Cylinders, Inc. has been reflected since June 2009. The acquisition of the net assets of Laser Products has been reflected since July 2008. The acquisition of the net assets of The Sharon Companies Ltd. has been reflected since June 2008.

Item 7. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Selected statements contained in this “Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based, in whole or in part, on management’s beliefs, estimates, assumptions and currently available information. For a more detailed discussion of what constitutes a forward-looking statement and of some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, please refer to the “Safe Harbor Statement” in the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Part I—Item 1A.—Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Introduction

Worthington Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or the “Company”), is primarily a diversified metals manufacturing company, focused on value-added steel processing and manufactured metal products. Our manufactured metal products include: pressure cylinder products such as propane, oxygen, refrigerant oxygen,and industrial cylinders, hand torches, camping cylinders, scuba tanks, compressed natural gas and industrial cylinders, scuba tanks, hand torches, and helium balloon kits; custom-engineered openkits, and closedsteel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for primarily the oil and gas industry; engineered cabs and operator stations weldments, kits accessories and cab components for a wide range of heavy mobile equipment;components; framing systems and stairs for mid-rise buildings; steel pallets and racks; and, through joint ventures, suspension grid systems for concealed and lay-in panel ceilings; laser-weldedlaser welded blanks; light gauge steel framing for commercial and residential construction; and current and past model automotive service stampings. Our number one goal is to increase shareholder value, which we seek to accomplish by optimizing existing operations, developing and commercializing new products and applications, and pursuing strategic acquisitions and joint ventures.

As of May 31, 2012,2013, excluding our joint ventures, we operated 3536 manufacturing facilities worldwide, principally in fourthree reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Engineered Cabs and, on an historical basis, Metal Framing. OtherCabs. Our remaining operating segments, which are immaterialdo not meet the applicable aggregation criteria or quantitative thresholds for purposes of separate disclosure, are combined and reported in the “Other” category. These include the Steel Packaging, Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations operating segments.

During the Worthingtonfirst quarter of fiscal 2013, we made certain organizational changes impacting the internal reporting and management structure of our former Global Group (the “Global Group”). operating segment. As a result of these organizational changes, management responsibilities and internal reporting were re-aligned into two new operating segments: Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations. These organizational changes did not impact the composition of our reportable business segments as none of the operating segments impacted met the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure.

Additionally, we no longer manage our residual metal framing assets in a manner that constitutes an operating segment. Accordingly, the financial results and operating performance of our former Metal Framing operating segment, including activity related to the wind-down of this business, are reported within the Other category for segment reporting purposes. Segment information reported in previous periods has been restated to conform to this new presentation.

We also held equity positions in 12 joint ventures, which operated 4447 manufacturing facilities worldwide, as of May 31, 2012. For additional information regarding the formation of Engineered Cabs, refer to theRecent Business Developments section below.2013.

Overview

DuringThe Company’s performance during fiscal 2012, we benefited2013 was strong relative to the prior year, aided by strong earnings growth in Pressure Cylinders and higher earnings from our joint ventures.

Volume trends were mixed in fiscal 2013. Pressure Cylinders volumes were up 15% driven by the impact of acquisitions. Steel Processing volumes were down 8%, but direct volumes, which carry a higher margin,

were up approximately 3%, after excluding volumes from the continued strengthening of the automotive market. Additionally, recent acquisitions by the Company, as discussed in theRecent Business Developments section below, have proven complementary to our existing businesses and contributed to earnings. ClarkWestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”) and ArtiFlex Manufacturing LLC (“ArtiFlex”), joint ventures formedMISA Metals facilities which were wound down or sold during the fourth quarterpast year.

Engineered Cabs continues to experience soft demand due to production declines at its top customer. We are responding to the current environment and are implementing a plan to adjust costs accordingly without sacrificing production capacity. We are taking advantage of fiscal 2011, also performed well,these market conditions to increase the pace and focus of our transformation work, as did our joint ventures in general. ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex are discusseddescribed in more detail below:below.

On March 1, 2011, we closed an agreement with Marubeni-Itochu Steel America, Inc. (“MISA”) to combine certain assets of Dietrich Metal Framing (“Dietrich”) and ClarkWestern Building Systems Inc. in a new joint venture, ClarkDietrich. We contributed our metal framing business, excluding the Vinyl division, to ClarkDietrich, including all of the related working capital and six of the 13 facilities. In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. steel processing locations (the “MMI acquisition”) and a 25% noncontrolling ownership interest in ClarkDietrich. We retained and continued to operate the remaining metal framing facilities (the “retained facilities”), on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into the new joint venture. As of August 31, 2011, all of the retained facilities had ceased operations. In a separate transaction, the Vinyl division was sold to ClarkDietrich on October 31, 2011.

On May 9, 2011, we closed an agreement to combine certain assets of The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”) and International Tooling Solutions, LLC in a new joint venture, ArtiFlex. In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 50% noncontrolling ownership interest in the new joint venture in addition to certain cash and other consideration.

As a result of these transactions (collectively, the “Joint Venture Transactions”), the contributed net assets of Dietrich (excluding the Vinyl division) and Gerstenslager were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011 and May 9, 2011, respectively. Accordingly, the financial results and operating performance of these businesses are reported on a historical basis through the respective dates of deconsolidation, with our portion of the net earnings of ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex reported within the equityEquity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates (“equity income”) line itemwas up a modest 2% over fiscal 2012. However, current year equity income was reduced by $5.8 million of impairment and restructuring charges, including $4.8 million related to the impairment of our 40%-owned metal framing joint venture in China. Excluding these items, equity income was up 8%. With the exception of our joint venture in China, all of our unconsolidated joint ventures operated at a profit during fiscal 2013, led by Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”), TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”), and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”), which contributed $65.5 million, $12.6 million and $8.8 million of equity income, respectively. Additionally, we received $84.5 million in dividends from our unconsolidated joint ventures for the year.

The Company continues its strategy of optimizing existing operations and pursuing growth opportunities that add to our current businesses. We initiated the diagnostics phase of the Transformation Plan within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and these efforts are progressing through each facility. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated the diagnostics phase in our consolidated statements of earnings since the dates of deconsolidation.

Engineered Cabs operating segment. For additional information regarding the Joint Venture Transactions,Transformation Plan, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE ADSummary of Significant Accounting Policies”Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Business Developments

 

On March 22,August 10, 2012, we acquiredissued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of 12-year Senior Notes due 2024 through a 75% ownershipprivate placement with seven entities within the Prudential Capital Group. The Senior Notes bear interest in PSI Energy Solutions, LLC (“PSI”) for cash considerationat a fixed rate of $7.0 million. PSI is a professional services firm that develops cost-effective energy solutions for public and private entities throughout North America. The acquired net assets became part of our Global Group operating segment upon closing and will be reported in the “Other” category for segment reporting purposes.4.6%.

On January 10, 2012, we announced a voluntary recall of our MAP-PRO®, propylene and MAAP® cylinders and related hand torch kits. The recall was a precautionary step and involved a valve supplied by a third party that may leak when a torch or hose is disconnected from the cylinder. We are unaware of any incidence of fire or injury caused by this situation. For additional information regarding the recall, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

On December 29, 2011, weSeptember 17, 2012, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired 100% of the outstanding economic interestscommon shares of Angus Industries,Westerman, Inc. (“Angus”Westerman”) for cash consideration of approximately $132.9$62.7 million and the assumption of approximately $47.3$7.3 million of debt. Additionally, we issued 382,749 restricted common sharesdebt, which was repaid at closing. Westerman manufactures tanks, pressure vessels and other products for the oil and gas and nuclear markets as well as hoists and other products for marine applications. Westerman also leverages its manufacturing competencies to certain former employeesproduce pressure vessels, atmospheric tanks, controls and various custom machined components for other industrial end markets. Westerman became part of Angus who became employees of Worthington upon closing. Approximately $1.1 million of the $6.3 million fair value of these restricted common shares was attributed to the purchase price and recognized as goodwill. Angus designs and manufactures high-quality, custom-engineered open and closed cabs and operator stations for a wide range of heavy mobile equipment. In connection with this acquisition, we established a newour Pressure Cylinders operating segment Engineered Cabs, which is considered a separate reportable segment.upon closing.

 

On December 1, 2011, weOctober 31, 2012, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment completed the sale of its European air brake tank business to Frauenthal Automotive. Based in Hustopece, Czech Republic, Worthington Cylinders a.s. manufactured air brake tank cylinders for the European commercial vehicle market.

On April 9, 2013, our Pressure Cylinders operating segment acquired the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company,Palmer Mfg. & Tank, Inc. (“Coleman Cylinders”Palmer”). The purchase price consisted of for cash consideration of approximately $22.7$113.5 million. Palmer manufactures steel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for the oil and gas industry, and custom manufactured fiberglass tanks for agricultural, chemical and general industrial applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closingclosing.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we repurchased a total of 925,000 of our common shares for $30.4 million at an average price of $32.88 per share.

On June 21, 2013, we announced the planned consolidation of the transaction. SubsequentBernzOmatic hand torch manufacturing operations in Medina, New York into our existing facility in Chilton, Wisconsin. The Company estimates that the consolidation and closure will result in restructuring charges in the range of $4.0 million to closing, we received a request from$5.0 million, primarily due to severance costs, relocation and equipment installation, training costs and other miscellaneous start-up costs. Approximately $2.5 million of severance costs were recognized in the Federal Trade Commission, asking usfourth quarter of fiscal 2013 in connection with this matter. The closure of the Medina operation is expected to provide, on a voluntary basis, certain information relatedbe complete by mid-calendar 2014 to the acquisition and the industry as it conducts a preliminary investigation into the transaction. The acquisition fell below the threshold for pre-merger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.ensure an orderly transition.

 

On June 26, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share, an increase of $0.02 per share from the previous quarterly rate. The dividend is payable on September 30, 2011, we completed the acquisition27, 2013 to shareholders of Poland-based STAKO sp.Z o.o. (“STAKO”). STAKO manufactures liquefied natural gas, propane and butane fuel tanks for use in passenger cars, buses and trucks. The acquired business became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction.

On July 1, 2011, we purchased substantially all of the net assets (excluding accounts receivable) of the BernzOmatic business (“Bernz”) of Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. for cash consideration of approximately $41.0 million. In connection with this transaction, we agreed to settle our ongoing dispute with Bernz, which was valued at $10.0 million. Bernz is a leading manufacturer of hand held torches and accessories. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of the transaction.record on September 13, 2013.

Market & Industry Overview

We sell our products and services to a diverse customer base and a broad range of end markets. The breakdown of our net sales by end market for fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 is illustrated in the following chart:

 

The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of flat-rolled steel, and thus the largest end market for our Steel Processing operating segment. Approximately 52%57% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment are to the automotive market. North American vehicle production, primarily by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors (the “Detroit Three automakers”), has a considerable impact on the activity within this operating segment. The majority of the net sales of five of our unconsolidated affiliates, including the recently-formed ArtiFlex joint venture, wereventures are also to the automotive end market.

Approximately 44% and 11%10% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment, 45% of the net sales of our Engineered Cabs and Steel Processing operating segments, respectively,segment and substantially all of the net sales of our Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment are to the construction market. While the market price of steel significantly impacts these businesses, there are other key indicators that are meaningful in analyzing construction market demand, including U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”), the Dodge Index of construction contracts, and trends in the relative price of framing lumber and steel. The construction market is also the predominant end market for twothree of our unconsolidated joint ventures, WAVE, ClarkDietrich and Worthington Armstrong VentureModern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (“WAVE”WMSFMCo”) and ClarkDietrich. The decrease in the portion of our total net sales to the construction market versus fiscal 2011 was primarily driven by the deconsolidation of substantially.

Substantially all of the net assets of Dietrich Metal Framing (“Dietrich”) on March 1, 2011, as more fully described herein.

The net sales of our Pressure Cylinders and Steel Packaging operating segments,segment, and approximately 56%33% and 37%55% of the net sales of our Steel Processing and Engineered Cabs and Steel Processing operating segments, respectively, are to other markets such as leisure and recreation, industrial gas, HVAC, lawn and garden, agriculture, mining forestry and appliance. Given the many different products that make up these net sales and the wide variety of end

markets, it is very difficult to detail the key market indicators that drive this portion of our business. However, we believe that the trend in U.S. GDP growth is a good economic indicator for analyzing these operating segments.

We use the following information to monitor our costs and demand in our major end markets:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, Increase /
(Decrease)
   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, Increase /
(Decrease)
 
  2012 2011 2010 2012 vs.
2011
 2011 vs.
2010
   2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
 

U.S. GDP (% growth year-over-year)1

   0.5  2.4  0.1  -1.9  2.3   1.7%  0.5%  2.4%  1.2%  -1.9%

Hot-Rolled Steel ($ per ton)2

  $693   $680   $549   $13   $131    $616  $693  $680  ($77) $13 

Detroit Three Auto Build (000’s vehicles)3

   8,084    7,251    5,650    833    1,601     8,553   8,084   7,251   469   833 

No. America Auto Build (000’s vehicles)3

   14,242    12,756    10,643    1,486    2,113     15,716   14,242   12,756   1,474   1,486 

Zinc ($ per pound)4

  $0.96   $1.00   $0.94   ($0.04 $0.06    $0.90  $0.96  $1.00  ($0.06) ($0.04)

Natural Gas ($ per mcf)5

  $3.61   $4.14   $4.35   ($0.53 ($0.21  $3.49  $3.61  $4.14  ($0.12) ($0.53)

On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices ($ per gallon)6

  $3.93   $3.35   $2.77   $0.58   $0.58    $3.96  $3.93  $3.35  $0.03  $0.58 

 

1 20112012 figures based on revised actuals2 CRU Index; period average    3 CSM AutobaseIHS Global    4 LME Zinc; period average    5 NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas; period average    6 Energy Information Administration; period average

U.S. GDP growth rate trends are generally indicative of the strength in demand and, in many cases, pricing for our products. A year-over-year increase in U.S. GDP growth rates is indicative of a stronger economy, which generally increases demand and pricing for our products. Conversely, decreasing U.S. GDP growth rates generally indicatesindicate a weaker economy. Changes in U.S. GDP growth rates can also signal changes in conversion costs related to production and in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense.

The market price of hot-rolled steel is one of the most significant factors impacting our selling prices and operating results. When steel prices fall, we typically have higher-priced material flowing through cost of goods sold, while selling prices compress to what the market will bear, negatively impacting our results. On the other hand, in a rising price environment, our results are generally favorably impacted, as lower-priced material purchased in previous periods flows through cost of goods sold, while our selling prices increase at a faster pace to cover current replacement costs.

The following table presents the average quarterly market price per ton of hot-rolled steel during fiscal 2012,2013, fiscal 2011,2012, and fiscal 2010:2011:

 

(Dollars per ton1)  Fiscal Year   Inc / (Dec)   Fiscal Year   Inc / (Dec) 
  2012   2011   2010   2012 vs. 2011 2011 vs. 2010   2013   2012   2011     2013 vs. 2012       2012 vs. 2011   

1st Quarter

  $709    $611    $439    $98    16.0 $172     39.2  $616   $709   $611   ($93)   -13.1%  $98    16.0%

2nd Quarter

  $660    $557    $538    $103    18.5 $19     3.5  $622   $660   $557   ($38)   -5.8%  $103    18.5%

3rd Quarter

  $718    $699    $549    $19    2.7 $150     27.3  $629   $718   $699   ($89)   -12.4%  $19    2.7%

4th Quarter

  $684    $851    $669    ($167  -19.6 $182     27.2  $595   $684   $851   ($89)   -13.0%  ($167)   -19.6%

Annual Avg.

  $693    $680    $549    $13    1.9 $131     23.9  $616   $693   $680   ($77)   -11.1%  $13    1.9

 

1CRU Hot-Rolled Index

No single customer contributed more than 10% of our consolidated net sales during fiscal 2012.2013. While our automotive business is largely driven by the production schedules of the Detroit Three automakers, our customer base is much broader and includes other domestic manufacturers and many of their suppliers. During fiscal 2012,2013, we continued to benefit from improving automotive production from the Detroit Three automakers, which experienced an 11%a 6% increase in vehicle production over the prior year. Additionally, North American vehicle production during fiscal 20122013 was up 12%10% over the prior year.

Certain other commodities, such as zinc, natural gas and diesel fuel, represent a significant portion of our cost of goods sold, both directly through our plant operations and indirectly through transportation and freight expense.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results for the periods indicated:

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions) 2013  % of
Net sales
  2012  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

 $2,612.2   100.0% $2,534.7   100.0% $77.5��

Cost of goods sold

  2,215.6   84.8%  2,201.8   86.9%  13.8 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

  396.6   15.2%  332.9   13.1%  63.7 

Selling, general and administrative expense

  258.3   9.9%  225.1   8.9%  33.2 

Impairment of long-lived assets

  6.5   0.2%  0.4   0.0%  6.1 

Restructuring and other expense

  3.3   0.1%  6.0   0.2%  (2.7)

Joint venture transactions

  (0.6)  0.0%  (0.2)  0.0%  (0.4)
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

  129.1   4.9%  101.6   4.0%  27.5 

Miscellaneous income

  1.5   0.1%  2.3   0.1%  (0.8)

Interest expense

  (23.9)  -0.9%  (19.5)  -0.8%  4.4 

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  94.6   3.6%  92.8   3.7%  1.8 

Income tax expense

  (64.5)  -2.5%  (51.9)  -2.0%  12.6 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings

  136.8   5.2%  125.3   4.9%  11.5 

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (0.4)  0.0%  (9.7)  -0.4%  (9.3)
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

 $136.4   5.2% $115.6   4.6% $20.8  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for fiscal 2013 increased $20.8 million over fiscal 2012. Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $77.5 million from fiscal 2012. Higher overall volumes, aided by the impact of acquisitions, favorably impacted net sales by $182.6 million. The impact of higher overall volumes was partially offset by lower average selling prices, primarily in Steel Processing, which negatively impacted net sales by $105.1 million. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $616 per ton during fiscal 2013 versus an average of $693 per ton during fiscal 2012.

Gross margin increased $63.7 million from fiscal 2012 due to the aforementioned increase in volumes, a more favorable product mix, and a decrease in charges related to the fiscal 2012 voluntary product recall in Pressure Cylinders. Gross margin for fiscal 2013 included $2.6 million of product recall charges compared to $9.7 million in the comparable period in the prior year. For additional information regarding the product recall, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SG&A expense increased $33.2 million from fiscal 2012, primarily due to the impact of acquisitions and higher profit sharing and bonus expense resulting from higher net earnings.

Impairment charges of $6.5 million consisted of $5.0 million related to Pressure Cylinders’ investment in a 60%-owned consolidated joint venture in India, $2.0 million of which was attributed

to the non-controlling interest, and $1.5 million related to the sale of Pressure Cylinders’ business in Czech Republic. For additional information regarding these impairment charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE C – Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Restructuring charges of $3.3 million consisted primarily of a $2.5 million accrual for severance costs associated with the recently announced consolidation of our BernzOmatic hand torch manufacturing operation in Medina, New York into the existing Pressure Cylinders facility in Chilton, Wisconsin and $1.8 million of facility exit and other costs associated with the closure of our commercial stairs business. For additional information regarding these restructuring charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In connection with the wind down of our former Metal Framing operating segment, we recognized a net benefit of $0.6 million within the “joint venture transactions” financial statement caption in our consolidated statement of earnings. This amount consisted primarily of $1.9 million of net gains on asset disposals partially offset by facility exit and other costs. For additional information, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest expense of $23.9 million was $4.4 million higher than the prior fiscal year, as the impact of higher average interest rates due to a higher mix of long-term versus short-term debt more than offset the impact of lower average debt levels. For additional information, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE G – Debt and Receivables Securitization” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Equity income increased $1.8 million from fiscal 2012. The majority of equity income is generated by our WAVE joint venture, where our portion of net earnings increased $3.5 million, or 6%, to $65.5 million. Additionally, our portion of net earnings of ClarkDietrich and TWB increased $2.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively, over fiscal 2012. The overall increase in equity income was partially offset by a $4.8 million charge related to the write-off of the investment in our joint venture in China. For additional financial information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Income tax expense increased $12.6 million from fiscal 2012 due primarily to higher earnings. Fiscal 2013 income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest of 32.1% versus 31.0% in fiscal 2012. These rates are calculated based on net earnings attributable to controlling interest, as reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings. The increase in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was due primarily to a reduction in the benefit associated with lower tax rates on foreign income. The reduction in the tax benefit associated with lower tax rates on foreign income was due to certain foreign impairment charges for which there was no associated tax benefit. The 32.1% rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of the benefits from the qualified production activities deduction and lower tax rates on foreign income (collectively decreasing the rate by 3.6%). These impacts are partially offset by state and local income taxes of 1.0% (net of their federal tax benefit). For additional information, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE L – Income Taxes” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2013   % of
Net sales
  2012  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,443.5    100.0% $1,578.5   100.0% $(135.0)

Cost of goods sold

   1,269.5    87.9%  1,399.9   88.7%  (130.4)
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   174.0    12.1%  178.6   11.3%  (4.6)

Selling, general and administrative expense

   107.9    7.5%  109.1   6.9%  (1.2)

Joint venture transactions

   -    0.0%  (2.1)  -0.1%  2.1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

  $66.1    4.6% $71.6   4.5% $(5.5)
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $1,036.1    $1,159.3   $(123.2)

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,659     2,898    (239)

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $135.0 million from fiscal 2012. Lower base material prices throughout fiscal 2013 led to decreased pricing for our products, negatively impacting net sales by $120.7 million. Overall volumes were also down during fiscal 2013, negatively impacting net sales by $14.3 million. The mix of direct versus toll tons was 56% to 44% during fiscal 2013 versus 51% to 49% in the prior fiscal year. After excluding volumes from the MISA Metals facilities, which were wound down or sold during the current year, direct volumes increased approximately 3%. The change in mix of direct versus toll tons was driven primarily by our Spartan joint venture. As expected, volumes at Spartan were down as a result of our partner moving business to their in-house galvanizing facility. However, volumes have stabilized at the lower level and the business remains solidly profitable.

Operating income decreased $5.5 million from fiscal 2012 primarily due to the impact of lower volumes. Also contributing to the decrease was a $2.1 million gain in the prior fiscal year related to the disposal of two of the three MISA Metals steel processing facilities acquired in fiscal 2011. This gain was included in the joint venture transactions financial statement caption to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with this transaction.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2013   % of
Net sales
  2012   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $859.3    100.0% $770.1    100.0% $89.2 

Cost of goods sold

   676.8    78.8%  641.8    83.3%  35.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   182.5    21.2%  128.3    16.7%  54.2 

Selling, general and administrative expense

   106.9    12.4%  83.1    10.8%  23.8 

Impairment of long-lived assets

   6.5    0.8%  -    0.0%  6.5 

Restructuring charges

   2.7    0.3%  -    0.0%  2.7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

  $66.4    7.7% $45.2    5.9% $21.2 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Material cost

  $409.1    $386.7    $22.4 

Units shipped (in thousands)

   82,189     71,777     10,412 

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $89.2 million from fiscal 2012 driven almost entirely by the impact of acquisitions.

Operating income increased $21.2 million from fiscal 2012 due primarily to improved margins, as costs associated with the voluntary product recall decreased by $7.1 million. Gross margin also improved due to contributions from acquisitions, cost containment efforts, and a more favorable product mix. The increase in gross margin was partially offset by higher SG&A expense due to the impact of acquisitions, an increase in corporate allocated expenses, and increased spending for new product development. Additionally, SG&A expense in the prior fiscal year included a $4.4 million gain related to the settlement of a legal dispute. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” for additional detail. Fiscal 2013 impairment charges included $5.0 million related to our investment in a 60%-owned consolidated joint venture in India and $1.5 million related to the sale of our air brake tank business in Czech Republic. Fiscal 2013 restructuring charges consisted primarily of severance costs associated with the recently announced consolidation of our BernzOmatic hand torch manufacturing operation in Medina, New York into the existing Pressure Cylinders facility in Chilton, Wisconsin

Engineered Cabs

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Engineered Cabs operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2013   % of
Net sales
  2012   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $226.0    100.0% $104.3    100.0% $121.7  

Cost of goods sold

   194.4    86.0%  88.9    85.2%  105.5  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross margin

   31.6    14.0%  15.4    14.8%  16.2  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   27.4    12.1%  10.5    10.1%  16.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operating income

  $4.2    1.9% $4.9    4.7% $(0.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Material cost

  $112.8    $53.9    $58.9  

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $121.7 million from fiscal 2012. This business was acquired on December 29, 2011 and therefore only five months of results were included in the prior fiscal year.

Operating income decreased $0.7 million from fiscal 2012. As expected, lower volumes resulting from production delays and lower demand from Engineered Cabs’ top customer had a negative impact in the current year. In response to the current environment, we are implementing a plan to reduce costs accordingly without sacrificing production capacity. A charge of $0.7 million related to the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock awards also negatively impacted operating income in fiscal 2013. Operating income in the prior fiscal year was reduced by $5.0 million of expenses associated with the write-up of inventory to fair value in connection with the application of purchase accounting and various acquisition-related costs.

Other

The Other category includes our Steel Packaging, Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations operating segments, as they do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure. Certain income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments are also included in the Other category as is the activity related to the wind down of our former Metal Framing operating segment. The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Other category for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2013  % of
Net sales
  2012  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $83.5   100.0% $81.8   100.0% $1.7 

Cost of goods sold

   75.0   89.8%  71.2   87.0%  3.8 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   8.5   10.2%  10.6   13.0%  (2.1)

Selling, general and administrative expense

   16.0   19.2%  22.3   27.3%  (6.3)

Restructuring and other expense

   0.6   0.7%  6.4   7.8%  (5.8)

Joint venture transactions

   (0.6)  -0.7%  1.9   2.3%  (2.5)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating loss

  $(7.5)  -9.0% $(20.0)  -24.4% $12.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $1.7 million from fiscal 2012, primarily due to higher volumes in the Construction Services operating segment.

Operating loss decreased $12.5 million from fiscal 2012 driven by the impact of the joint venture transactions and reductions in both SG&A and restructuring and other expense. For additional information regarding these restructuring charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results for the periods indicated:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions) 2012  % of
Net sales
  2011  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

 $2,534.7   100.0% $2,442.6   100.0% $92.1 

Cost of goods sold

  2,201.8   86.9%  2,086.4   85.4%  115.4 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

  332.9   13.1%  356.2   14.6%  (23.3)

Selling, general and administrative expense

  225.1   8.9%  235.2   9.6%  (10.1)

Impairment of long-lived assets

  0.4   0.0%  4.4   0.2%  (4.0)

Restructuring and other expense

  6.0   0.2%  2.6   0.1%  3.4 

Joint venture transactions

  (0.2)  0.0%  (10.4)  -0.4%  10.2 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

  101.6   4.0%  124.4   5.1%  (22.8)

Miscellaneous income (expense)

  2.3   0.1%  0.6   0.0%  1.7 

Interest expense

  (19.5)  -0.8%  (18.8)  -0.8%  0.7 

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  92.8   3.7%  76.3   3.1%  16.5 

Income tax expense

  (51.9)  -2.0%  (58.5)  -2.4%  (6.6)
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings

  125.3   4.9%  124.0   5.1%  1.3 

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (9.7)  -0.4%  (8.9)  -0.4%  0.8 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

 $115.6   4.6% $115.1   4.7% $0.5 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for fiscal 2012 increased $0.5 million over fiscal 2011. Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales increased $92.1 million from fiscal 2011, driven primarily by higher average selling prices in response to the higher cost of steel, which favorably impacted net sales by $151.1 million. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $693 per ton during fiscal 2012 versus an average of $680 per ton during fiscal 2011. Overall volumes decreased as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions, which negatively impacted net sales by $335.1 million. Excluding the impact of the Joint Venture Transactions, overall volumes increased by $276.1 million, $104.3 million of which was due to the Angus acquisition. Improved volumes were most notable in our Pressure Cylinders and Steel Processing operating segments, where net sales increased 22% and 12%, respectively, over fiscal 2011. The overall improvement in volumes for Pressure Cylinders was partially offset by an accrual for anticipated product returns related to the voluntary recall described in theRecent Business Developments section above, which negatively impacted net sales by $4.7 million.

Net sales increased $92.1 million from fiscal 2011, driven primarily by higher average selling prices in response to the higher cost of steel, which favorably impacted net sales by $151.1 million. Selling prices are affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $693 per ton during fiscal 2012 versus an average of $680 per ton during fiscal 2011. Overall volumes decreased as a result of the deconsolidation of our former Metal Framing and Automotive Body Panels operating segments in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 (the “Joint Venture Transactions”), which negatively impacted net sales by $335.1 million. Excluding the impact of the Joint Venture Transactions, overall volumes increased by $276.1 million, $104.3 million of which was due to the acquisition of Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”). Improved volumes were most notable in our Pressure Cylinders and Steel Processing operating segments, where net sales increased 22% and 12%, respectively, over fiscal 2011. The overall improvement in volumes for Pressure Cylinders was partially offset by an accrual for anticipated product returns related to the voluntary recall, which negatively impacted net sales by $4.7 million.

 

Gross margin decreased $23.3 million from fiscal 2011 as the increase in net sales was more than offset by higher manufacturing expenses and a lower spread between average selling prices and material costs due to inventory holding losses realized in fiscal 2012 versus inventory holding gains in the prior year. Gross margin was also negatively impacted by $9.7 million as a result of certain accruals recorded in connection with the voluntary recall noted above.

SG&A expense decreased $10.1 million from fiscal 2011, primarily due to the impact of the Joint Venture Transactions, which reduced SG&A expense by $35.9 million. The overall decrease in SG&A expense was partially mitigated by the impact of acquisitions.

Restructuring charges increased $3.4 million from fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2012 charges were primarily driven by professional fees resulting from our ongoing transformation efforts within Pressure Cylinders and severance accrued in connection with the previously announced closure of our Commercial Stairs business unit. For additional information regarding these restructuring charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Expense.”

 

In connection with the wind-down of our Metal Framing operating segment, we recognized a net benefit of $0.2 million within the joint venture transaction line in our consolidated statement of earnings. This amount consisted of $9.1 million of post-closure facility exit and other costs, offset by $8.3 million of net gains on asset disposals. In addition, the severance accrued in connection with the Joint Venture Transactions was adjusted downward resulting in a $1.0 million credit to earnings. For additional information, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Expense.”

 

Interest expense of $19.5 million was $0.7 million higher than the prior fiscal year due to the impact of higher average debt levels.

 

Equity income increased $16.5 million from fiscal 2011. The majority of the equity income is generated by our WAVE joint venture, where our portion of net earnings increased $4.2 million, or 7%. ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex joint ventures formed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, also contributed to the current yearfiscal 2012 increase, providing $6.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of equity income in fiscal 2012.income. For additional financial information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Affiliates.”

 

Income tax expense decreased $6.6 million from fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2012 income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest of 31.0% versus 33.7% in fiscal 2011. These rates are calculated based on net earnings attributable to controlling interest, as reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings. The decrease in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was due to more of the Company’s income qualifying for the production activities deduction, and certain one-timenon-recurring items. The 31.0% rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of the benefits from the qualified production activities deduction and lower tax rates on foreign income (collectively decreasing the rate by 5.0%). These impacts are partially offset by state and local income taxes of 1.6% (net of their federal tax benefit). For additional information, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE KL – Income Taxes” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Taxes.”

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012  % of
Net sales
  2011  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,578.5   100.0% $1,405.5   100.0% $173.0 

Cost of goods sold

   1,399.9   88.7%  1,216.5   86.6%  183.4 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   178.6   11.3%  189.0   13.4%  (10.4)

Selling, general and administrative expense

   109.1   6.9%  111.6   7.9%  (2.5)

Restructuring and other income

   -   0.0%  (0.3)  0.0%  0.3 

Joint venture transactions

   (2.1)  -0.1%  -   0.0%  (2.1)
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

  $71.6   4.5% $77.7   5.5% $(6.1)
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $1,159.3   $1,001.9   $157.4 

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,898    2,589    309 

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales increased $173.0 million from fiscal 2011. Higher base material prices throughout the year led to increased pricing for our products, favorably impacting net sales by $103.3 million. Overall volumes, aided by continued improvement in the automotive market, increased 12% over fiscal 2011, favorably impacting net sales by $69.7 million. The mix of direct versus toll tons processed was 51% to 49% in fiscal 2012, compared with a 55% to 45% mix in the prior fiscal year.

 

Operating income decreased $6.1 million from fiscal 2011 as the increase in net sales was more than offset by a lower spread between average selling prices and material costs due to inventory holding losses realized in fiscal 2012 versus inventory holding gains in the prior year. Operating income was also adversely impacted by higher manufacturing expenses, primarily freight costs. The impact of these items was partially mitigated by a decrease in SG&A expense due to lower profit sharing and bonus expenses in the current fiscal year2012 as well as a $2.1 million gain related to the disposal of two of the three MISA Metals steel processing facilities acquired in the MMI acquisition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. This gain was included in the joint venture transactions line to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with this transaction.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31,   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012   % of
Net sales
 2011   % of
Net sales
 Increase/
(Decrease)
   2012   % of
Net sales
 2011   % of
Net sales
 Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $770.1     100.0 $591.9     100.0 $178.2    $770.1    100.0% $591.9    100.0% $178.2 

Cost of goods sold

   641.8     83.3  474.8     80.2  167.0     641.8    83.3%  474.8    80.2%  167.0 
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

    

 

    

 

 

Gross margin

   128.3     16.7  117.1     19.8  11.2     128.3    16.7%  117.1    19.8%  11.2 

Selling, general and administrative expense

   83.1     10.8  68.1     11.5  15.0     83.1    10.8%  68.1    11.5%  15.0 
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

    

 

    

 

 

Operating income

  $45.2     5.9 $49.0     8.3 $(3.8  $45.2    5.9% $49.0    8.3% $(3.8)
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

    

 

    

 

 

Material cost

  $386.7     $273.9     $112.8    $386.7    $273.9    $112.8 

Units shipped (in thousands)

   71,777      59,037      12,740     71,777     59,037     12,740  

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales increased $178.2 million from fiscal 2011. Higher overall volumes favorably impacted net sales by $135.2 million, aided by the fiscal 2012 acquisitions, which contributed $122.9 million. Overall pricing for our products favorably impacted net sales by $43.0 million, as higher base material prices led to increased pricing for our products. The overall improvement in volumes was partially offset by an accrual for anticipated product returns related to the voluntary recall described in theRecent Business Developments section above, which negatively impacted net sales by $4.7 million.

Net sales increased $178.2 million from fiscal 2011. Higher overall volumes favorably impacted net sales by $135.2 million, aided by the fiscal 2012 acquisitions, which contributed $122.9 million. Overall pricing for our products favorably impacted net sales by $43.0 million, as higher base material prices led to increased pricing for our products. The overall improvement in volumes was partially offset by an accrual for anticipated product returns related to the voluntary recall, which negatively impacted net sales by $4.7 million.

 

Operating income decreased $3.8 million from fiscal 2011 as the increase in gross margin was more than offset by higher SG&A expense. The increase in SG&A expense was driven by the impact of acquisitions and the absorption of a larger portion of corporate allocated expenses as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions partially offset by a $4.4 million settlement gain related to the Bernz acquisition.settlement of a legal dispute. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” and “NOTE N – Acquisitions” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional detail. The increase in gross margin was driven by higher volumes, aided by the impact of acquisitions, and an increased spread between selling prices and material costs offset by $9.7 million of charges related to the voluntary recall described above.

Engineered Cabs

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Engineered Cabs operating segment for the periods indicated:

 

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31,   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012   % of
Net sales
 2011   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
   2012   % of
Net sales
 2011   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $104.3     100.0 $        -      $104.3    $104.3    100.0% $        -     $104.3 

Cost of goods sold

   88.9     85.2  -       88.9     88.9    85.2%  -       88.9 
  

 

    

 

     

 

   

 

    

 

     

 

 

Gross margin

   15.4     14.8  -       15.4     15.4    14.8%  -       15.4 

Selling, general and administrative expense

   10.5     10.1  -       10.5     10.5    10.1%  -       10.5 
  

 

    

 

     

 

   

 

    

 

     

 

 

Operating income

  $4.9     4.7 $-      $4.9    $4.9    4.7% $-     $4.9 
  

 

    

 

     

 

   

 

    

 

     

 

 

Material cost

  $53.9     $-      $53.9    $53.9    $-     $53.9  

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales reflected five months of operations, as this business was acquired on December 29, 2011.

 

Current yearFiscal 2012 operating income of $4.9 million was negatively affected by $5.0 million of non-recurring expenses associated with the write-up of inventory to fair value in connection with the application of purchase accounting and various acquisition-related costs.

Metal Framing

The following table summarizes the operating results of our Metal Framing operating segment for the periods indicated. The operating results of the net assets contributed to the ClarkDietrich joint venture are included on a historical basis through March 1, 2011, the date of deconsolidation. Fiscal 2012 operating results reflect the operations of the Vinyl division through October 31, 2011, the date this business was sold.

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012  % of
Net sales
  2011  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $4.4    100.0 $249.5    100.0 $(245.1

Cost of goods sold

   4.4    100.0  225.8    90.5  (221.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   -    0.0  23.7    9.5  (23.7

Selling, general and administrative expense

   1.9    43.2  31.6    12.7  (29.7

Restructuring and other expense

   0.1    2.3  1.4    0.6  (1.3

Joint venture transactions

   1.9    43.2  (1.8  -0.7  3.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss

  $(3.9  -88.6 $(7.5  -3.0 $3.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $1.9    $161.0    $(159.1

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   1     184     (183

Operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales during fiscal 2012 reflect the operations of the Vinyl division through October 31, 2011 as well as the operations of the retained facilities through August 31, 2011, the date by which all of the retained facilities had ceased operations.

Fiscal 2012 operating loss of $3.9 million was driven primarily by $9.1 million of post-closure facility exit and other costs offset by $6.2 million of gains related to the sale of the Vinyl division and of other equipment and real estate.

Other

The Other category includes our Steel Packaging, Construction Services and Global GroupWorthington Energy Innovations operating segments, whichas they do not meet the quantitative teststhresholds for purposes of separate disclosure, as well as certaindisclosure. Certain income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments. Thesegments are also included in the Other

category also includesas is the resultsactivity related to the wind down of our former Automotive Body PanelsMetal Framing operating segment, on a historical basis, through May 9, 2011, the date of deconsolidation.segment. The following table representspresents a summary of operating results for the Other operating segmentscategory for the periods indicated:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012  % of
Net sales
  2011  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $77.4    100.0 $195.6    100.0 $(118.2

Cost of goods sold

   66.8    86.5  169.3    86.6  (102.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   10.6    13.7  26.3    13.4  (15.7

Selling, general and administrative expense

   20.4    26.5  23.6    12.1  (3.2

Impairment of long-lived assets

   -    -0.1  4.4    2.2  (4.4

Restructuring and other expense

   6.3    8.0  1.6    0.8  4.7  

Joint Venture Transactions

   -    -0.1  (8.6  -4.4  8.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  $(16.1  -20.8 $5.3    2.7 $(21.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2012  % of
Net sales
  2011  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $81.8   100.0% $445.1   100.0% $(363.3)

Cost of goods sold

   71.2   87.0%  395.1   88.8%  (323.9)
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   10.6   13.0%  50.0   11.2%  (39.4)

Selling, general and administrative expense

   22.3   27.3%  55.2   12.4%  (32.9)

Impairment of long-lived assets

   0.4   0.5%  4.4   1.0%  (4.0)

Restructuring and other expense

   6.0   7.3%  3.0   0.7%  3.0 

Joint Venture Transactions

   1.9   2.3%  (10.4)  -2.3%  12.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss

  $(20.0)  -24.4% $(2.2)  -0.5% $(17.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

 

Net sales decreased $118.2$363.3 million from fiscal 2011, driven primarily by the deconsolidation of our former Metal Framing and Automotive Body Panels operating segmentsegments during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Excluding the impact of this transaction, net sales decreased $28.2 million, driven primarily by lower volumes in the Global Group operating segment.

 

Operating loss of $16.1increased $17.8 million represented a decrease of $21.4 million from operating income of $5.3 million in fiscal 2011, driven by the deconsolidation of our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment, the impact of the joint venture transactions, higher restructuring charges,and other expense, and lower volumes in the Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment. Current year restructuring charges were primarily driven by professional fees resulting from our ongoing transformation efforts within Pressure Cylinders and severance accrued in connection with the previously announced closure of our Commercial Stairs business unit. Consistent with similar charges incurred in prior periods, the professional fees were not allocated to any of our operating segments.

Fiscal 2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results for the periods indicated.

  Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions) 2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

 $2,442.6    100.0 $1,943.0    100.0 $499.6  

Cost of goods sold

  2,086.4    85.4  1,663.1    85.6  423.3  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

  356.2    14.6  279.9    14.4  76.3  

Selling, general and administrative expense

  235.2    9.6  218.3    11.2  16.9  

Impairment of long-lived assets

  4.4    0.2  35.4    1.8  (31.0

Restructuring and other expense

  2.6    0.1  4.2    0.2  (1.6

Joint venture transactions

  (10.4  -0.4  -    0.0  (10.4
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

  124.4    5.1  22.0    1.1  102.4  

Miscellaneous income (expense)

  0.6    0.0  1.1    0.1  (0.5

Interest expense

  (18.8  -0.8  (9.5  -0.5  9.3  

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

  76.3    3.1  64.6    3.3  11.7  

Income tax expense

  (58.5  -2.4  (26.7  -1.4  31.8  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings

  124.0    5.1  51.5    2.7  72.5  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

  (8.9  -0.4  (6.3  -0.3  (2.6
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

 $115.1    4.7 $45.2    2.3 $69.9  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for fiscal 2011 were $115.1 million, an increase of $69.9 million from fiscal 2010.

Net sales increased $499.6 million from fiscal 2010 to $2,442.6 million. Higher volumes increased net sales by $271.3 million, most notably in our Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments. Additionally, average selling prices increased over the prior fiscal year due to the higher cost of steel, favorably impacting net sales by $228.3 million in fiscal 2011. Selling prices were affected by the market price of steel, which averaged $680 per ton for fiscal 2011 as compared to an average of $549 per ton for fiscal 2010 (an increase of 24%).

Gross margin improved $76.3 million from fiscal 2010. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to increased volumes in our Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, as well as an increase in the spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel, most notably in Steel Processing.

SG&A expense increased $16.9 million from fiscal 2010, primarily due to the impact of acquisitions and higher profit sharing and bonus expense, driven by the increase in net earnings during fiscal 2011.

Impairment charges decreased $31.0 million from fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 impairment charges of $4.4 million were comprised of the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Global Group operating segment ($2.5 million) and our Steel Packaging operating segment ($1.9 million). This compares to impairment charges of $35.4 million in fiscal 2010, consisting primarily of the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of our Commercial Stairs business unit reported as part of our then Construction Services operating segment ($32.7 million) as well as the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment ($2.7 million). For additional information regarding these impairment charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements.”

Restructuring and other expense decreased $1.6 million from fiscal 2010. Substantially all of the activity in both fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was associated with the Transformation Plan, which continued to progress through the remaining steel processing facilities as well as the metal framing facilities that are now part of ClarkDietrich. Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2011 consisted primarily of employee severance and facility exit costs. Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2010 also consisted of employee severance and facility exit costs as well as professional fees. For additional information regarding these restructuring charges, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note D –Restructuring and Other Expense.”

Fiscal 2011 operating income was also favorably impacted by a one-time net gain of $10.4 million related to the contribution of certain net assets to our newly formed joint ventures, Artiflex and ClarkDietrich, and the corresponding deconsolidations of Gerstenslager and Dietrich. A one-time gain of approximately $8.6 million was recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Gerstenslager, which was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $6.4 million related to certain long-lived assets retained in the transaction. Similarly, a one-time gain of approximately $1.8 million was recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Dietrich, which was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $18.3 million and restructuring charges of approximately $11.2 million incurred in connection with the metal framing facilities retained. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Interest expense increased $9.3 million from fiscal 2010 primarily due to higher interest rates as a result of the April 2010 issuance of 6.50% notes due April 15, 2020 with an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. Higher debt levels driven by acquisitions, share repurchases and increased working capital needs also contributed to the increase in interest expense in fiscal 2011.

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates increased $11.7 million from fiscal 2010. The majority of our equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates is attributed to our WAVE joint venture, where net income increased 7% from fiscal 2010. Four other joint ventures, TWB Company, Worthington Specialty Processing, Serviacero Worthington and Samuel Steel Pickling all contributed earnings and showed a combined improvement of $5.1 million over fiscal 2010. ClarkDietrich also contributed to the fiscal 2011 increase, providing $2.1 million of equity income

since its formation on March 1, 2011. For additional information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates.”

Income tax expense increased $31.8 million from fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest of 33.7% versus 37.1% in fiscal 2010. These rates are calculated based on net earnings attributable to controlling interest, as reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings. The decrease in the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was due primarily to (i) various changes in the estimated valuation of deferred taxes, including a $3.0 million valuation allowance recorded during fiscal 2010 related to net operating losses previously reported in state income tax filings, and (ii) the change in the mix of income among the jurisdictions in which we do business, partially offset by the impact of a fiscal 2010 tax benefit associated with the previously mentioned impairment charges. The 33.7% rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily as a result of the benefits from lower tax rates on foreign income and the qualified production activities deduction (collectively decreasing the rate by 4.1%). These impacts were partially offset by state and local income taxes of 2.8% (net of their federal tax benefit). For additional information regarding the deviation from statutory income tax rates, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note K – Income Taxes.”

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $1,405.5    100.0 $989.0    100.0 $416.5  

Cost of goods sold

   1,216.5    86.6  853.2    86.3  363.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   189.0    13.4  135.8    13.7  53.2  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   111.6    7.9  84.9    8.6  26.7  

Restructuring and other income

   (0.3  0.0  (0.5  -0.1  0.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

  $77.7    5.5 $51.4    5.2 $26.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $1,001.9    $685.3    $316.6  

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   2,589     2,055     534  

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased by $416.5 million from fiscal 2010 to $1,405.5 million. Direct and toll volume increased 25% and 27%, respectively, accounting for $256.3 million of the increase in net sales during fiscal 2011. The increase in volume was driven by stronger economic conditions, especially in the automotive end market. Additionally, higher base material prices in fiscal 2011 led to increased pricing for our products, favorably impacting net sales by $160.2 million over fiscal 2010.

Operating income increased by $26.3 million from fiscal 2010 to $77.7 million. Higher volumes, aided by the impact of acquisitions, improved operating income by $53.9 million. The impact of higher volumes, however, was partially offset by higher manufacturing expenses. Additionally, SG&A expense increased $26.7 million during fiscal 2011 due to higher profit sharing and bonus expenses, the impact of acquisitions and an increase in the portion of allocated corporate expenses.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011   % of
Net sales
  2010   % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $591.9     100.0 $467.6     100.0 $124.3  

Cost of goods sold

   474.8     80.2  376.0     80.4  98.8  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gross margin

   117.1     19.8  91.6     19.6  25.5  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   68.1     11.5  61.2     13.1  6.9  

Restructuring and other expense

   -     0.0  0.3     0.1  (0.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operating income

  $49.0     8.3 $30.1     6.4 $18.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Material cost

  $273.9     $208.3     $65.6  

Units shipped (in thousands)

   59,037      55,436      3,601  

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased by $124.3 million from fiscal 2010 to $591.9 million. Higher volumes increased net sales by $92.2 million driven by the continued recovery in the European industrial gas and automotive markets, stable market conditions in our North American operations and the impact of acquisitions. Additionally, higher overall pricing for our products increased net sales by $32.1 million over fiscal 2010.

Operating income increased $18.9 million from fiscal 2010 to $49.0 million. Strong results from our North American operations, and the improvement and return to profitability of our European operations were the primary drivers of the increase in fiscal 2011 operating income. SG&A expense increased $6.9 million in fiscal 2011 mainly due to higher profit sharing and bonus expenses, the impact of acquisitions and an increase in the portion of allocated corporate expenses.

Metal Framing

The following table summarizes the operating results of our Metal Framing operating segment for the periods indicated. The operating results of the net assets contributed to the ClarkDietrich joint venture are included on a historical basis through March 1, 2011, the date of deconsolidation.

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $249.5    100.0 $330.6    100.0 $(81.1

Cost of goods sold

   225.8    90.5  294.6    89.1  (68.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   23.7    9.5  36.0    10.9  (12.3

Selling, general and administrative expense

   31.6    12.7  42.3    12.8  (10.7

Restructuring and other expense

   1.4    0.6  3.9    1.2  (2.5

Joint venture transactions

   (1.8  -0.7  -    0.0  1.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss

  $(7.5  -3.0 $(10.2  -3.1 $2.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Material cost

  $161.0    $200.2    $(39.2

Tons shipped (in thousands)

   184     278     (94

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased by $81.1 million from fiscal 2010 to $249.5 million. A 34% decline in volumes, driven by the contribution of our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich as well as depressed levels of demand in the commercial and residential construction markets, reduced net sales by $111.9 million. Higher base material prices led to increased pricing for our products, favorably impacting net sales by $30.8 million.

Operating loss decreased $2.7 million from fiscal 2010 to $7.5 million. Gross margin decreased $12.3 million in fiscal 2011 driven by lower volumes due to the contribution of our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich as well as depressed levels of demand. The impact of the decrease in gross margin during fiscal 2011 was partially mitigated by a $10.7 million decrease in SG&A expense, also driven by lower volumes.

Additionally, a one-time net gain of $1.8 million recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of certain net assets of Dietrich also favorably impacted fiscal 2011 operating results. This gain was recorded net of impairment and restructuring charges incurred in connection with certain metal framing facilities retained of $18.3 million and $11.2 million, respectively. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Other

The Other category includes our Steel Packaging and Global Group operating segments, which do not meet the materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure, as well as certain income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments. The Other category also includes the results of our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment, on a historical basis, through May 9, 2011, the date of deconsolidation. The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Other operating segments for the periods indicated:

   Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 
(Dollars in millions)  2011  % of
Net sales
  2010  % of
Net sales
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 

Net sales

  $195.6    100.0 $155.9    100.0 $39.7  

Cost of goods sold

   169.3    86.8  139.5    89.5  29.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   26.3    13.4  16.4    10.5  9.9  

Selling, general and administrative expense

   23.6    12.2  29.8    19.1  (6.2

Impairment of long-lived assets

   4.4    2.1  35.4    22.7  (31.0

Restructuring and other expense

   1.6    0.7  0.5    0.3  1.1  

Joint venture transactions

   (8.6  -4.5  -    0.0  (8.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  $5.3    2.7 $(49.3  -31.6 $54.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales increased $39.7 million in fiscal 2011 to $195.6 million, as volumes across all operating segments increased. Construction-related business units within the Global Group operating segment, however, were negatively affected by the weakness in the commercial construction market.

Operating income improved $54.6 million from fiscal 2010 to $5.3 million. An increase in gross margin during fiscal 2011, aided by improvements in most operating segments, favorably impacted operating income by $9.9 million. Additionally, impairment charges decreased $31.0 million from

fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2011 impairment charges of $4.4 million were comprised of the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Global Group operating segment ($2.5 million) and our Steel Packaging operating segment ($1.9 million). This compares to impairment charges of $35.4 million in fiscal 2010, consisting primarily of the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of our previously reported Construction Services operating segment ($32.7 million) as well as the impairment of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment ($2.7 million).

Fiscal 2011 operating income was also favorably impacted by a one-time net gain of $8.6 million recognized in connection with the deconsolidation of Gerstenslager. This gain was recorded net of impairment charges of approximately $6.4 million related to certain long-lived assets of Gerstenslager that were retained. For additional information regarding the items classified as joint venture transactions in our consolidated statements of earnings, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A –Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During fiscal 2012,2013, we generated $173.7$273.0 million in cash from operating activities, received $37.1 million of proceeds from the sale of assets, invested $31.7$44.6 million in property, plant and equipment and spent $239.9$175.2 million on acquisitions, net of cash acquired. Additionally, we repurchased 4,466,970925,000 of our common shares for $73.4$30.4 million and paid $32.1$44.1 million of dividends. These activities were funded with $97.6We also repaid $168.4 million of short-term borrowings, as well aswhich was partially funded by $150.0 million of proceeds from the cash generated from operating activities and a $50.0 million one-time special dividend from our WAVE joint venture.issuance of long-term debt. The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows for each period shown:

 

  Fiscal Years Ended
May 31,
   Fiscal Years Ended
May 31,
 
(in millions)     2012       2011         2013       2012    

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $173.7   $71.9    $273.0  $173.7 

Net cash used by investing activities

   (188.6  (39.3   (202.0)  (188.6)

Net cash used by financing activities

   (0.2  (35.4   (60.6)  (0.2)
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (15.1  (2.8

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   10.4   (15.1)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   56.2    59.0     41.0   56.1 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $41.0   $56.2    $51.4  $41.0 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

We believe we have access to adequate resources to meet our needs for normal operating costs, mandatory capital expenditures, mandatory debt redemptions, dividend payments and working capital for our existing businesses. These resources include cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and unused lines of credit. We also believe we have adequate access to the financial markets to

allow us to be in a position to sell long-term debt or equity securities. However, given the current uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets, our ability to access capital and the terms under which we can do so may change.

On July 3, 2012, we reached an agreement in principal to issue up to $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in a private placement offering. These notes will mature 12 years from the issuance date and will bear interest at a rate of 4.60%. We expect to complete this private placement offering during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

The cash and equivalents balance at May 31, 20122013 included $29.5$43.6 million of cash held by subsidiaries outside of the United States. Although the majority of this cash is available for repatriation, bringing the money into the United States could trigger federal, state and local income tax obligations. We do not have any intentions to repatriate cash held by subsidiaries outside of the United States.

Operating activities

Our business is cyclical and cash flows from operating activities may fluctuate during the year and from year to year due to economic and industry conditions. We rely on cash and short-term borrowings to meet cyclical increases in working capital needs. These needs generally rise during periods of increased economic activity or increasing raw material prices due to higher levels of inventory and accounts receivable. During economic slowdowns, or periods of decreasing raw material costs, working capital needs generally decrease as a result of the reduction of inventories and accounts receivable.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $173.7$273.0 million during fiscal 20122013 compared to $71.9$173.7 million in fiscal 2011.2012. The difference was driven largely by a change in the classification of proceeds from our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”) as short-term borrowings effective June 1, 2010 as well as overall changes in working capital needs. Proceeds received fromneeds and to a lesser extent the AR Facilityimprovement in net earnings over the prior to June 1, 2010, were recorded as a reduction of accounts receivable. As a result, the $45.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the AR Facility at May 31, 2010 were recorded as a reduction of accounts receivable, whereas the $135.0 million and $90.0 million of borrowings outstanding at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were classified as short-term borrowings.year.

Investing activities

Net cash used by investing activities was $188.6$202.0 million and $39.3$188.6 million in fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, respectively. This increase of $149.3$13.4 million was caused by several factors, as explained below.

Capital expenditures reflect cash used for investment in property, plant and equipment and are presented below by reportable business segment (this information excludes cash flows related to acquisition and divestiture activity):

 

  Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
   Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
 
(in millions)     2012         2011         2013         2012    

Steel Processing

  $9.7    $6.1    $8.3   $9.7 

Pressure Cylinders

   8.5     10.0     13.4    8.5 

Engineered Cabs

   4.6     -     6.3    4.6 

Metal Framing

   -     1.1  

Other

   8.9     4.8     16.6    8.9 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Capital Expenditures

  $31.7    $22.0    $44.6   $31.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Capital expenditures increased $9.7$12.9 million in fiscal 20122013 due primarily to activity associated with the addition of Angus and the purchase of an aircraft.our principal corporate office building and certain capital projects in Pressure Cylinders.

We also used more cash for acquisitions in fiscal 2012, asOther factors contributing to the cash consideration paid for PSI, Angus, Coleman Cylinders, Bernz and STAKO in the current year was $208.1 million more than the aggregate price paid for the assets of Hy-Mark and our 60% ownership interest in WNCL in fiscal 2011. Partially offsetting the overall increase in cash used by investing activities were $45.9 million of netin fiscal 2013 included lower distributions from unconsolidated affiliates driven by theof $45.0 million due to a $50.0 million one-timenon-recurring dividend from our WAVE joint venture. Higherduring the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and $20.1 million of lower proceeds from the sale of assets, which increasedassets. The impact of these items was partially offset by $16.5 million in fiscal 2012, also helped to offset the year-over-year increasea decrease in cash used by investing activities. Current year asset disposals resulted primarily fromfor acquisitions, as the wind downcash consideration paid for Palmer and Westerman in fiscal 2013 was $64.6 million less than the consideration transferred for PSI Energy Solutions, LLC, Angus, the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company, Inc., the retained metal framing facilities.BernzOmatic business of Irwin Industrial Tool Company and STAKO sp.z o.o. in fiscal 2012.

Investment activities are largely discretionary and future investment activities could be reduced significantly or eliminated as economic conditions warrant. We assess acquisition opportunities as they arise, and such opportunities may require additional financing. There can be no assurance, however, that any such opportunities will arise, that any such acquisitions will be consummated or that any needed additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when required.

Financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities was $0.2 million and $35.4$60.6 million in fiscal 20122013. During fiscal 2013, we repaid $168.4 million of short-term borrowings, which was partially funded by $150.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, as described in more detail below. We received $37.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of common shares from the exercise of stock options and fiscal 2011, respectively. The decrease was driven primarily by common share repurchases, which declined $59.3paid $44.1 million of dividends in fiscal 2012, partially offset by lower net proceeds from short-term borrowings. The $35.32013, which represents a $12.0 million decreaseincrease over fiscal 2012. Additionally, we paid $30.4 million to repurchase 925,000 of our common shares in net proceeds from short-term borrowings resulted primarily from the repayment of debt assumed in connection with the acquisition of Angus.fiscal 2013.

Long-term debt — Our senior unsecured long-term debt is rated “investment grade” by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group. In January 2012, Standard & Poor’s reaffirmed their BBB stable rating. On March 28, 2012, Moody’s Investor Services downgraded its credit rating of Worthington from Baa2 to Baa3. We don’t anticipate that this will affect our borrowing rates under the current credit agreement as it provides for use of the higher rating in the event of a split. We typically use the net proceeds from long-term debt for acquisitions, refinancing of outstanding debt, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. As of May 31, 2012,2013, we were in compliance with our long-term debt covenants. Our long-term debt agreements do not include ratings triggers or material adverse change provisions.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due on April 15, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The 2020 Notes were sold to the public at 99.890% of the principal amount thereof, to yield 6.515% to maturity. We used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and amounts then outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The proceeds on the issuance of the 2020 Notes were reduced for debt discount ($0.2 million), payment of debt issuance costs ($1.5 million) and settlement of a hedging instrument entered into in anticipation of the issuance of the 2020 Notes ($1.4 million).

In connection with the acquisition of Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”) on December 29, 2011, we assumed industrial revenue bonds (“IRBs”) issued by the South Dakota Economic Development Finance Authority that mature in April 2019 and had an outstanding principal balancesbalance of $0.6$2.1 million and $2.5 million and mature in March 2013 (the “2013 IRBs”) and April 2019 (the “2019 IRBs”), respectively. The 2013 IRBs bear interest at rates between 3.75% and 5.25% and the 2019May 31, 2013. These IRBs bear interest at rates between 2.75% and 5.00%.

On April 27, 2012, we executed a $5.9 million seven-year term loan that matures on May 1, 2019. The loan bears interest at a rate of 2.49% and is secured by an aircraft that was purchased with its proceeds.

On July 3,August 10, 2012, we reached an agreement in principal to issue up toissued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior unsecured notes in a private placement offering. These notes will mature 12 years from the issuance date and willdue August 10, 2024 (the “2024 Notes”). The 2024 Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.60%. We expectThe net proceeds from this issuance were used to complete this private placement offering duringrepay a portion of the first quarteroutstanding borrowings under our multi-year revolving credit facility and amounts outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility, both of fiscal 2013.which are described in more detail below.

Short-term borrowings Our short-term debt agreements do not include ratings triggers or material adverse change provisions. We were in compliance with our short-term debt covenants at May 31, 2012.2013.

On May 4, 2012, we executedWe maintain a new $425.0 million multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders that matures in May 2017. The Credit Facility replaced our $400.0 million

facility that was set to expire in May 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Facility have maturities of less than one year and given that our intention has been to repay them within a year, they have been classified as short-term borrowings within current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. However, we can also extend the term of amounts borrowed by renewing these borrowings for the term of the Credit Facility. We have the

option to borrow at rates equal to an applicable margin over the LIBOR, Prime or Fed Funds rates. The applicable margin is determined by our credit rating. At May 31, 2012, $135.62013, $8.3 million of borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility and bore interest at rates based on LIBOR. The average variable rate was 1.29%1.24% at May 31, 2012.2013.

We provided approximately $11.0$11.7 million in letters of credit for third-party beneficiaries as of May 31, 2012.2013. The letters of credit secure potential obligations to certain bond and insurance providers. These letters can be drawn at any time at the option of the beneficiaries, and while not drawn against at May 31, 20122013 or 2011,2012, these letters of credit are issued against and therefore reduce availability under the Credit Facility. We had $278.4$405.0 million available to us under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2012,2013, compared to $349.5$278.4 million available to us under our prior credit facility at May 31, 2011.2012.

We also maintain a revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility which expires in January 2013.(the “AR Facility”). The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011.2012. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012,2013, we increaseddecreased our borrowing capacity under the AR Facility from $150.0 million to $100.0 million and extended its maturity to $150.0 million.January 2015. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $150.0$100.0 million of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-seller, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, and concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value. As of May 31, 2012,2013, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $150.0$100.0 million limit and $135.0$100.0 million of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

We also maintain a $9.5 million credit facility, through our consolidated joint venture, WNCL, that matures in November 2012.2013. This credit facility bears interest at a variable rate, which was 2.50%2.25% at May 31, 2012.2013.

Common shares We declared dividends at a quarterly dividendsrate of $0.13 per common share for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2013 compared to $0.12 per common share for each quarter of fiscal 2012. On December 10, 2012, compared to $0.10the Board of Directors declared an accelerated third and fourth quarter cash dividend totaling $0.26 per common share for each quartershare. The dividend was paid on December 28, 2012 to shareholders of fiscal 2011.record as of December 21, 2012. We paid dividends on our common shares of $32.1$44.1 million and $30.2$32.1 million in fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, respectively.

On September 26, 2007,June 29, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of our outstanding common shares of which 494,802 common shares5,102,832 remained available for repurchase at May 31, 2011. On June 29, 2011, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 of our outstanding2013. During fiscal 2013, 925,000 common shares increasing the total number of common shares available for repurchase to 10,494,802.

During fiscal 2012, wewere repurchased 4,466,970 of our common shares for $73.4 million, exhausting all of the common shares available for repurchase under the September 26, 2007 authorization and leaving 6,027,832 of common shares available for repurchase under the June 29, 2011this authorization.

The common shares available for repurchase under these authorizations may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other relevant considerations. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

Dividend Policy

We currently have no material contractual or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends. Dividends are declared at the discretion of our Board of Directors. The Board reviews the dividend quarterly

and establishes the dividend rate based upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, current and projected cash flows, business prospects and other relevant factors. While we have paid a dividend every quarter since becoming a public company in 1968, there is no guarantee this will continue in the future.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of May 31, 2012.2013. Certain of these contractual obligations are reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, while others are disclosed as future obligations in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

  Payments Due by Period   Payments Due by Period 
(in millions)  Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
   Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
 

Short-term borrowings

  $274.9    $274.9    $-    $-    $-    $113.7   $113.7   $-   $-   $- 

Long-term debt

   258.8     1.3     102.4     2.5     152.6     407.3    1.1    102.4    2.6    301.2 

Interest expense on long-term debt

   95.0     15.3     30.5     19.8     29.4     172.4    22.2    44.3    33.5    72.4 

Operating leases

   27.5     9.3     7.8     4.8     5.6     29.9    8.0    8.9    6.0    7.0 

Unconditional purchase obligations

   16.6     2.4     4.7     4.7     4.8  

Royalty obligations

   12.0     2.0     4.0     4.0     2.0     12.0    2.0    4.0    4.0    2.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total contractual cash obligations

  $684.8    $305.2    $149.4    $35.8    $194.4    $735.3   $147.0   $159.6   $46.1   $382.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Interest expense on long-term debt is computed by using the fixed rates of interest on the debt, including impacts of the related interest rate hedge. Unconditional purchase obligations are to secure access to a facility used to regenerate acid used in our Steel Processing operating segment through the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. Royalty obligations relate to a trademark license agreement executed in connection with the acquisition of Coleman Cylinders in fiscal 2012. For additional information regarding this agreement, refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with our unrecognized tax benefits of $4.4$3.7 million, we are unable to make a reliable estimate of the periods of cash settlement with the respective tax authorities and have not included this amount in the contractual obligations table above.

The following table summarizes our other commercial commitments as of May 31, 2012.2013. These commercial commitments are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheet.

 

  Commitment Expiration by Period   Commitment Expiration by Period 
(in millions)  Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
   Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1 - 3
Years
   4 - 5
Years
   After
5 Years
 

Guarantees

  $19.9    $14.9    $-    $5.0    $-    $19.0   $14.0   $5.0   $-   $- 

Standby letters of credit

   11.0     10.4     0.6     -     -     11.7    11.3    0.4    -    - 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total commercial commitments

  $30.9    $25.3    $0.6    $5.0    $-    $30.7   $25.3   $5.4   $-   $- 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have guarantees or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial

condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of May 31, 2012,2013, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which we have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately $14.9$14.0 million at May 31, 2012.2013. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a $5.0 million term loan held by ArtiFlex, an unconsolidated joint venture. In addition, we had in place approximately $11.0$11.7 million of outstanding stand-by letters of credit as of May 31, 2012.2013. These letters of credit were issued to

third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at May 31, 2012.2013. Based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to these guarantees, and determined that the fair value of our obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2011, new accounting guidance was issued that establishes certain additional disclosure requirements about financial instruments and derivativesderivative instruments that are subject to netting arrangements. The new disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those periods. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that resulted in common fair value measurements and disclosures under both U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This amended guidance is explanatory in nature and does not require additional fair value measurements nor is it intended to result in significant changes in the application of current guidance. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance on March 1, 2012, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This new guidance requires entities to present reclassification adjustments included in other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements and allows entities to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. It also eliminates the option for entities to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. For public companies, this accounting guidance iswas effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Retrospective application to prior periods is required. The adoptionWe adopted the effective provisions of this new accounting guidance effective for us on June 1, 2012 will not impact our financial position or resultsand have provided the required statements of operations.comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. In December 2011, certain provisions of this new guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income were temporarily deferred to a laterdeferred. In February 2013, an effective date was established for the provisions that has yet to be determined.had been deferred. These provisions are effective prospectively for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2012. We are in the process of determining our method of presentation; however, we do not anticipateexpect the adoption of this new accounting guidance willthese provisions, which relate to presentation only, to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The two-step quantitative impairment test is required only if, based on its qualitative assessment, an entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, amended accounting guidance was issued that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative test unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In March 2013, amended accounting guidance was issued regarding the accounting for cumulative translation adjustment. The amended guidance specifies that a cumulative translation adjustment should be released from earnings when an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a group

of assets within a consolidated foreign entity and the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity. For sales of an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment attributable to the investment would be recognized in earnings upon sale of the investment. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Environmental

We do not believe that compliance with environmental issues have hadlaws has or will have a material effect on our capital expenditures, future results of operations or financial position or competitive position.

Inflation

The effects of inflation on our operations were not significant during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to our valuation of receivables, inventories, intangible assets, accrued liabilities, income and other tax accruals and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect our significant judgments and uncertainties that could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Although actual results historically have not deviated significantly from those determined using our estimates, as discussed below, our financial position or results of operations could be materially different if we were to report under different conditions or to use different assumptions in the application of such policies. We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical to us, as these are the primary areas where financial information is subject to our estimates, assumptions and judgment in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition:We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss provided evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable and the ability to collect is probable. In circumstances where the collection of payment is not probable at the time of shipment, we defer recognition of revenue until payment is collected. We provide for returns and allowances based on historical experience and current customer activities.

The business units that comprise the Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment, which have contributed less than 5.0%5% of consolidated net sales for each of the last three fiscal years, recognize revenue on a percentage-of-completion method.

Receivables:    In order to ensure that our receivables are properly valued, we utilize two contra-receivable accounts: returns and allowances and allowance for doubtful accounts. Returns and allowances are used to record estimates of returns or other allowances resulting from quality, delivery, discounts or other issues affecting the value of receivables. This account is estimated based on historical trends and current market conditions, with the offset to net sales.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is used to record the estimated risk of loss related to the customers’ inability to pay. This allowance is maintained at a level that we consider appropriate based on factors that affect collectability, such as the financial health of our customers, historical trends of charge-offs and recoveries and current economic and market conditions. As we monitor our receivables, we identify customers that may have payment problems, and we adjust the allowance accordingly, with the offset to selling, general and administrativeSG&A expense. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when recovery is considered remote.

We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are properly valued and collectible. Based on this review, we believe our related reserves are sized appropriately. The reserve for doubtful accounts decreasedincreased approximately $0.8$0.1 million during fiscal 20122013 to $3.3$3.4 million.

While we believe our allowances are adequate, changes in economic conditions, the financial health of customers and bankruptcy settlements could impact our future earnings. If the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction end markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required.

Inventory Valuation:    Our inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using a first-in, first-out method. This assessment requires the use of significant estimates to determine replacement cost, cost to complete, normal profit margin and ultimate selling price of the inventory. We believe that our inventories were valued appropriately as of May 31, 2012,2013 and May 31, 2011.2012.

Impairment of Definite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Impairment testing involves a comparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings.recognized. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value.

Fiscal 2013: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, due to current and projected operating losses at our 60%-owned consolidated joint venture in India, we determined that certain indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long-range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $6.9 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $5.0 million. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. The portion of this impairment loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest, or $2.0 million, is recorded within net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statement of earnings.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, our Pressure Cylinders operations in Czech Republic met the applicable criteria for classification as assets held for sale. The net book value of this asset group was determined to be in excess of fair value, and, as a result, this asset group was written down to its fair value less cost to sell, or $6.9 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.6 million. On October 31, 2012, we completed the sale of this asset group to an unrelated third party resulting in a gain of approximately $50,000. The combined impact of these items of $1.5 million is presented within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings.

Fiscal 2012: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow

projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $0.2 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $0.4 million. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

Fiscal 2011: During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment that were not contributed to the ArtiFlex joint venture, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net carrying value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of carrying value to fair value also indicated excess carrying value, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $6.4 million. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation, as more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Metal Framing operating segment that were not contributed to the ClarkDietrich joint venture, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified assets was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s estimate of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net carrying value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of carrying value to fair value also indicated excess carrying value, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $18.3 million. Consistent with the classification of the gain on deconsolidation and related restructuring charges, as more fully described in “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary

Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” this impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line in our consolidated statements of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Commercial Stairs business unit, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net carrying value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of carrying value to fair value also indicated excess carrying value, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $2.5 million, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The subsequent comparison of book value to fair value also indicated excess book value, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $1.9 million, which was recognized within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for information regarding the determination of fair value for these assets.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Metal Framing and Steel Packaging operating segments, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset groups was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to each asset group was more than the net book value for each of the asset groups; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets of our consolidated joint venture, Spartan, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset group was more than the net book value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized.

Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Long-Lived Assets:    Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may be present. Application of goodwill impairment testing involves judgment, including but not limited to, the identification of reporting units and estimation of the fair value of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that the characteristics of the reporting units within each operating segment are similar and allow for their aggregation in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of each operating segment, determined using discounted cash flows, to each operating segment’s respective carrying value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment is indicated. The

amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the net assets of the operating segment, excluding goodwill, to its estimated fair value, with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is lower than its carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated statements of earnings.

We performed our annual impairment evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 and concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized. However, futureAs expected, the estimated fair value of the Engineered Cabs operating segment, which was formed in connection with the recent acquisition of Angus and had goodwill of $44.9 million at May 31, 2013, exceeded its carrying value by less than 10%. A 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate for this operating segment could decrease the fair value by enough to result in some impairment based on the current forecast model. Future declines in the market and deterioration in earnings could lead to impairment charges in subsequent periods.a step 2 calculation to quantify a potential impairment.

Accounting for Derivatives and Other Contracts at Fair Value:    We use derivatives in the normal course of business to manage our exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign currency and interest rates. Fair values for these contracts are based upon valuation methodologies deemed appropriate in the circumstances; however, the use of different assumptions could affect the estimated fair values.

Stock-Based Compensation:    All share-based awards to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recorded as expense in the consolidated statements of earnings based on their fair values.

Income Taxes:    In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance, we account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of our assets and liabilities. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some, or a portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

In accordance with accounting literature related to uncertainty in income taxes, tax benefits from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the financial statements are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

We have reserves for taxes and associated interest and penalties that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by taxing authorities. It is our policy to record these in income tax expense. While we believe the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are appropriate, we have established the tax and interest reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge our positions. The tax reserves are analyzed periodically, and adjustments are made as events occur to warrant adjustment to the reserves, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues, and release of administrative guidance or court decisions affecting a particular tax issue.

Self-Insurance Reserves:    We are largely self-insured with respect to workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability, property damage, employee medical claims and other potential losses. In order to reduce risk and better manage our overall loss exposure, we purchase stop-loss insurance that covers individual claims in excess of the deductible amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to settle open claims, which includes estimates of legal costs expected to be incurred, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on actuarial valuations that take into consideration the historical average claim volume, the average cost for settled claims, current trends in claim costs, changes in our business and workforce, general economic factors and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimated reserves for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from assumptions used and historical trends. Facility consolidations, a focus on safety initiatives and an emphasis on property loss prevention and product quality have resulted in an improvement in our loss history and the related assumptions used to analyze many of the current self-insurance reserves. We will continue to review these reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if factors dictate a more frequent review is warranted.

The critical accounting policies discussed herein are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP, with a lesser need for our judgment in their application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Item 7A. — Quantitative—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to various market risks. We continually monitor these risks and regularly develop appropriate strategies to manage them. Accordingly, from time to time, we may enter into certain financial and commodity-based derivative instruments. These instruments are used solely to mitigate market exposure and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note OP – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Interest Rate Risk

We entered into an interest rate swap in October 2004, which was amended December 17, 2004. The swap has a notional amount of $100.0 million to hedge changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the LIBOR rate associated with the December 17, 2004, issuance of the 2014 Notes. See “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note G – Debt and Receivables Securitization” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The critical terms of the derivative correspond with the critical terms of the underlying exposure. The interest rate swap was executed with a highly rated financial institution. No credit loss is anticipated. We pay a fixed rate of 4.46% and receive a variable rate based on the six-month LIBOR. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the interest rate yield curve associated with our interest rate swap indicates that a 10% parallel decline in the yield curve would not materially impact the fair value of our interest rate swap. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the interest rates on our variable rate debt indicates that a 10% increase in those rates would not have materially impacted our reported results. Based on the terms of the noted derivative contract, such changes would also be expected to materially offset against each other.

We entered into a U.S. Treasury Rate-based treasury lock in April 2010, in anticipation of the issuance of $150.0 million principal amount of our 2020 Notes. Refer to “Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note G – Debt and Receivables Securitization” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the 2020 Notes. The treasury lock had a notional amount of $150.0 million to hedge the risk of changes in the semi-annual interest payments attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate during the several days leading up to the issuance of the 10-year fixed-rate debt. Upon pricing of the 2020 Notes, the derivative was settled and resulted in a loss of approximately $1.4 million, which has been reflected within other comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of equity. That balance is being recognized in earnings, as an increase to interest expense, over the life of the related 2020 Notes.

Foreign Currency Risk

The translation of foreign currencies into United States dollars subjects us to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates. Derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk; however, we do make use of forward contracts to manage exposure to certain intercompany loans with our foreign affiliates. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. At May 31, 2012,2013, the difference between the contract and book value of these instruments was not material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A 10% change in the exchange rate to the U.S. dollar forward rate is not expected to materially impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the U.S. dollar on these foreign currency-denominated contracts indicates that if the U.S. dollar uniformly weakened by 10% against all of these currency exposures,

the fair value of these instruments would not be materially impacted. Any resulting changes in fair value would be offset by changes in the underlying hedged balance sheet position. A sensitivity analysis of changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign locations indicates that a 10% increase in those rates would not have materially impacted our net results. The sensitivity analysis assumes a uniform shift in all foreign currency exchange rates. The assumption that exchange rates change in uniformity may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market risk for price fluctuations on purchases of steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials as well as our utility requirements. We attempt to negotiate the best prices for commodities and to competitively price products and services to reflect the fluctuations in market prices. Derivative financial instruments have been used to manage a portion of our exposure to fluctuations in the cost of certain commodities, including steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials. These contracts covered periods commensurate with known or expected exposures throughout the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012.2013. The derivative instruments were executed with highly rated financial institutions. No credit loss is anticipated. No derivatives are held for trading purposes.

A sensitivity analysis of changes in the price of hedged commodities indicates that a 10% decline in the market prices of steel, zinc, natural gas or any combination of these would not have a material impact to the value of our hedges or our reported results.

The fair values of our outstanding derivative positions as of May 31, 20122013 and 20112012 are summarized below. Fair values of these derivatives do not consider the offsetting impact of the underlying hedged item.

 

  

    Fair Value At May 31,    

   

    Fair Value At May 31,    

 
(in millions)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Interest rate

  $(10.7  $(12.4  $(7.9  $(10.7

Foreign currency

   0.9     (0.6   -     0.9  

Commodity

   (4.0   1.1     (1.1   (4.0
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $(13.8  $(11.9  $(9.0  $(13.8
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Safe Harbor

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk include forward-looking statements with respect to management’s opinion about risks associated with the use of derivative instruments. These statements are based on certain assumptions with respect to market prices and industry supply of, and demand for, steel products and certain raw materials. To the extent these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, future outcomes with respect to hedging programs may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.

Item 8. — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Worthington Industries, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended May 31, 2012.2013. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended May 31, 2012,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Worthington Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 30, 20122013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

July 30, 20122013

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

 

  May 31,   May 31, 
  2012   2011   2013   2012 

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $41,028    $56,167    $51,385   $41,028 

Receivables, less allowances of $3,329 and $4,150 at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively

   400,869     388,550  

Receivables, less allowances of $3,408 and $3,329 at May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

   394,327    400,869 

Inventories:

        

Raw materials

   211,543     189,450     175,093    211,543 

Work in process

   115,510     98,940     103,861    115,510 

Finished products

   74,887     82,440     77,814    74,887 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total inventories

   401,940     370,830     356,768    401,940 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income taxes receivable

   892     1,356     724    892 

Assets held for sale

   7,202     9,681     3,040    7,202 

Deferred income taxes

   20,906     28,297     21,928    20,906 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   41,402     36,754     38,711    41,402 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current assets

   914,239     891,635     866,883    914,239 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates

   240,882     232,149     246,125    240,882 

Goodwill

   156,681     93,633     213,858    156,681 

Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $16,103 and $12,688 at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively

   100,333     19,958  

Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $26,669 and $16,103 at May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

   147,144    100,333 

Other assets

   22,585     24,540     17,417    22,585 

Property, plant and equipment:

        

Land

   24,279     26,960     26,253    24,279 

Buildings and improvements

   187,514     182,030     205,017    187,514 

Machinery and equipment

   785,335     751,865     798,467    785,335 

Construction in progress

   12,775     7,878     22,899    12,775 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment

   1,009,903     968,733     1,052,636    1,009,903 

Less accumulated depreciation

   566,826     563,399     593,206    566,826 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment, net

   443,077     405,334     459,430    443,077 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $1,877,797    $1,667,249    $1,950,857   $1,877,797 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

 

  May 31,   May 31, 
  2012 2011   2013 2012 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

      

Current liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $252,334   $253,404    $222,696  $252,334 

Short-term borrowings

   274,923    132,956     113,728   274,923 

Accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes

   71,271    72,312     68,043   71,271 

Dividends payable

   8,478    7,175     551   8,478 

Other accrued items

   38,231    52,023     36,536   38,231 

Income taxes payable

   11,697    7,132     6,268   11,697 

Current maturities of long-term debt

   1,329    -     1,092   1,329 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   658,263    525,002     448,914   658,263 

Other liabilities

   72,371    56,594     70,882   72,371 

Distributions in excess of investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   69,165    10,715     63,187   69,165 

Long-term debt

   257,462    250,254     406,236   257,462 

Deferred income taxes

   73,099    83,981     89,401   73,099 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,130,360    926,546     1,078,620   1,130,360 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Shareholders’ equity – controlling interest:

      

Preferred shares, without par value; authorized – 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – none

   -    -     -   - 

Common shares, without par value; authorized – 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2012 – 67,906,369 shares, 2011 – 71,683,876 shares

   -    -  

Common shares, without par value; authorized – 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2013 – 69,752,411 shares, 2012 – 67,906,369 shares

   -   - 

Additional paid-in capital

   192,338    181,525     244,864   192,338 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $10,749 and $5,456 at May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively

   (20,387  3,975  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $8,571 and $10,749 at May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

   (12,036)  (20,387)

Retained earnings

   525,223    504,410     597,994   525,223 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity – controlling interest

   697,174    689,910     830,822   697,174 

Noncontrolling interest

   50,263    50,793     41,415   50,263 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total equity

   747,437    740,703     872,237   747,437 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $1,877,797   $1,667,249    $1,950,857  $1,877,797 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Fiscal Years Ended May 31,   Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 
  2012 2011 2010   2013 2012 2011 

Net sales

  $2,534,701   $2,442,624   $1,943,034    $2,612,244  $2,534,701  $2,442,624 

Cost of goods sold

   2,201,833    2,086,467    1,663,104     2,215,601   2,201,833   2,086,467 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross margin

   332,868    356,157    279,930     396,643   332,868   356,157 

Selling, general and administrative expense

   225,069    235,198    218,315     258,324   225,069   235,198 

Impairment of long-lived assets

   355    4,386    35,409     6,488   355   4,386 

Restructuring and other expense

   5,984    2,653    4,243     3,293   5,984   2,653 

Joint venture transactions

   (150  (10,436  -     (604)  (150)  (10,436)
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   101,610    124,356    21,963     129,142   101,610   124,356 

Other income (expense):

        

Miscellaneous income

   2,319    597    1,127     1,452   2,319   597 

Interest expense

   (19,497  (18,756  (9,534   (23,918)  (19,497)  (18,756)

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates

   92,825    76,333    64,601     94,624   92,825   76,333 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

   177,257    182,530    78,157     201,300   177,257   182,530 

Income tax expense

   51,904    58,496    26,650     64,465   51,904   58,496 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings

   125,353    124,034    51,507     136,835   125,353   124,034 

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest

   9,758    8,968    6,266     393   9,758   8,968 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

  $115,595   $115,066   $45,241    $136,442  $115,595  $115,066 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic

        

Average common shares outstanding

   69,651    74,803    79,127     69,301   69,651   74,803 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to controlling interest

  $1.66   $1.54   $0.57    $1.97  $1.66  $1.54 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

        

Average common shares outstanding

   70,252    75,409    79,143     71,314   70,252   75,409 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to controlling interest

  $1.65   $1.53   $0.57    $1.91  $1.65  $1.53  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

   2013   2012  2011 

Net earnings

  $136,835   $125,353  $124,034 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

     

Foreign currency translation

   5,393    (17,930)  13,046 

Pension liability adjustment

   2,273    (9,241)  1,442 

Cash flow hedges

   698    (318)  158 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   8,364    (27,489)  14,646 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   145,199    97,864   138,680 

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   406    6,631   9,008 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest

  $144,793   $91,233  $129,672 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(InDollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 Controlling Interest      Controlling Interest     
Common Shares Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total  Common Shares Additional
Paid-in

Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),

Net of Tax
  Retained
Earnings
  Total  Noncontrolling
Interest
  Total 
Shares Amount  Shares Amount 

Balance at May 31, 2009

  78,997,617    -    183,051    4,457    518,561    706,069    36,894    742,963  

Comprehensive income (loss):

        

Net earnings

  -    -    -    -    45,241    45,241    6,266    51,507  

Unrealized gain on investment

  -    -    -    5    -    5    -    5  

Foreign currency translation

  -    -    -    (13,739  -    (13,739  -    (13,739

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,163

  -    -    -    317    -    317    -    317  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $854

  -    -    -    (1,671  -    (1,671  -    (1,671
      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

       30,153    6,266    36,419  
      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Common shares issued

  219,804    -    2,291    -    -    2,291    -    2,291  

Stock-based compensation

  -    -    4,576    -    -    4,576    -    4,576  

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (4,539  (4,539

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

  -    -    -    -    (31,676  (31,676  -    (31,676
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2010

  79,217,421    -    189,918    (10,631  532,126    711,413    38,621    750,034    79,217,421    -    189,918    (10,631  532,126    711,413    38,621    750,034  

Comprehensive income:

                

Net earnings

  -    -    -    -    115,066    115,066    8,968    124,034    -    -    -    -    115,066    115,066    8,968    124,034  

Unrealized gain on investment

  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -  

Foreign currency translation

  -    -    -    13,006    -    13,006    40    13,046    -    -    -    13,006    -    13,006    40    13,046  

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $(760)

  -    -    -    1,442    -    1,442    -    1,442    -    -    -    1,442    -    1,442    -    1,442  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $563

  -    -    -    158    -    158    -    158    -    -    -    158    -    158    -    158  
      

 

  

 

  

 

       

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

       129,672    9,008    138,680         129,672    9,008    138,680  
      

 

  

 

  

 

       

 

  

 

  

 

 

Acquisition of Nitin Cylinders Limited

  -    -    -    -    -    -    14,156    14,156    -    -    -    -    -    -    14,156    14,156  

Common shares issued

  421,153    -    4,827    -    -    4,827    -    4,827    421,153    -    4,827    -    -    4,827    -    4,827  

Stock-based compensation

  -    -    6,173    -    -    6,173    -    6,173    -    -    6,173    -    -    6,173    -    6,173  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

  (7,954,698   (19,393   (113,371  (132,764  -    (132,764  (7,954,698   (19,393   (113,371  (132,764  -    (132,764

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest

  -    -��   -    -    -    -    (10,992  (10,992  -    -    -    -    -    -    (10,992  (10,992

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

  -    -    -    -    (29,411  (29,411  -    (29,411  -    -    -    -    (29,411  (29,411  -    (29,411
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2011

  71,683,876    -    181,525    3,975    504,410    689,910    50,793    740,703    71,683,876    -    181,525    3,975    504,410    689,910    50,793    740,703  

Comprehensive income:

                

Net earnings

  -    -    -    -    115,595    115,595    9,758    125,353    -    -    -    -    115,595    115,595    9,758    125,353  

Foreign currency translation

  -    -    -    (14,803  -    (14,803  (3,127  (17,930  -    -    -    (14,803  -    (14,803  (3,127  (17,930

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $4,975

  -    -    -    (9,241  -    (9,241  -    (9,241  -    -    -    (9,241  -    (9,241  -    (9,241

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $318

  -    -    -    (318  -    (318  -    (318  -    -    -    (318  -    (318  -    (318
      

 

  

 

  

 

       

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

       91,233    6,631    97,864         91,233    6,631    97,864  
      

 

  

 

  

 

       

 

  

 

  

 

 

Acquisition of PSI Energy Solutions, LLC

  -    -    -    -    -    -    2,333    2,333  

Acquisition of PSI Energy Solutions

  -    -    -    -    -    -    2,333    2,333  

Common shares issued

  689,463    -    11,428    -    -    11,428    -    11,428    689,463    -    11,428    -    -    11,428    -    11,428  

Stock-based compensation

  -    -    11,462    -    -    11,462    -    11,462    -    -    11,462    -    -    11,462    -    11,462  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

  (4,466,970   (12,077   (61,341  (73,418  -    (73,418  (4,466,970   (12,077   (61,341  (73,418  -    (73,418

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest, net

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (9,494  (9,494  -    -    -    -    -    -    (9,494  (9,494

Cash dividends declared ($0.48 per share)

  -    -    -    -    (33,441  (33,441  -    (33,441  -    -    -    -    (33,441  (33,441  -    (33,441
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2012

  67,906,369   $  -   $192,338   $(20,387 $525,223   $697,174   $50,263   $747,437    67,906,369   $-   $192,338   $(20,387 $525,223   $697,174   $50,263   $747,437  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income:

        

Net earnings

  -    -    -    -    136,442    136,442    393    136,835  

Foreign currency translation

  -    -    -    5,380    -    5,380    13    5,393  

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $(1,415)

  -    -    -    2,273    -    2,273    -    2,273  

Cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(763)

  -    -    -    698    -    698    -    698  
      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  -    -    -    -    -    144,793    406    145,199  
      

 

  

 

  

 

 

Common shares issued

  2,771,042    -    37,914    -    -    37,914    -    37,914  

Stock-based compensation

  -    -    17,829    -    -    17,829    -    17,829  

Purchases and retirement of common shares

  (925,000  -    (3,217  -    (27,200  (30,417  -    (30,417

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest, net

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (9,254  (9,254

Cash dividends declared ($0.52 per share)

  -    -    -    -    (36,471  (36,471  -    (36,471
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2013

  69,752,411   $  -   $244,864   $(12,036 $597,994   $830,822   $41,415   $872,237  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 Fiscal Years Ended May 31,  Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 
 2012 2011 2010  2013 2012 2011 

Operating activities:

      

Net earnings

 $125,353   $124,034   $51,507   $136,835  $125,353  $124,034 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

  55,873    61,058    64,653    66,469   55,873   61,058 

Impairment of long-lived assets

  355    4,386    35,409    6,488   355   4,386 

Restructuring and other expense, non-cash

  -    203    3,408    -   -   203 

Joint venture transactions, non-cash

  -    (21,652  -    -   -   (21,652)

Provision for deferred income taxes

  775    7,482    (6,110  1,798   775   7,482 

Bad debt expense (income)

  339    1,236    (900

Bad debt expense

  783   339   1,236 

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions

  (1,019  (19,188  (12,007  (10,948)  (1,019)  (19,188)

Net loss (gain) on sale of assets

  (5,918  652    (3,908  1,121   (5,918)  652 

Stock-based compensation

  11,742    6,173    4,570    13,270   11,742   6,173 

Excess tax benefits—stock-based compensation

  (578  (674  (165  (5,183)  (578)  (674)

Gain on acquisitions and sales of subsidiary investments

  -    -    (891

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisitions:

      

Receivables

  956    (96,056  (114,892  18,801   956   (96,056)

Inventories

  17,310    (24,261  (64,499  77,115   17,310   (24,261)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  8,478    (10,465  30,425    871   8,478   (10,465)

Other assets

  4,141    922    205    4,636   4,141   922 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  (45,847  31,098    125,613    (47,483)  (45,847)  31,098 

Other liabilities

  1,689    6,947    (1,999  8,404   1,689   6,947 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  173,649    71,895    110,419    272,977   173,649   71,895 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Investing activities:

      

Investment in property, plant and equipment, net

  (31,713  (22,025  (34,319  (44,588)  (31,713)  (22,025)

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  (239,851  (31,705  (63,098  (175,225)  (239,851)  (31,705)

Distributions from (investments in) unconsolidated affiliates, net

  45,879    (6,161  (483  863   45,879   (6,161)

Proceeds from sale of assets

  37,089    20,614    15,950    16,974   37,089   20,614 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used by investing activities

  (188,596  (39,277  (81,950  (201,976)  (188,596)  (39,277)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financing activities:

      

Net proceeds from (payments of) short-term borrowings

  97,626    132,956    (980  (168,446)  97,626   132,956 

Proceeds from long-term debt

  5,880    -    146,942    150,000   5,880   - 

Principal payments on long-term debt

  (342  -    (138,013  (1,480)  (342)  - 

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

  11,116    4,827    2,313    37,914   11,116   4,827 

Excess tax benefits—stock-based compensation

  578    674    165    5,183   578   674 

Payments to minority interest

  (9,494  (10,992  (4,539  (9,254)  (9,494)  (10,992)

Repurchase of common shares

  (73,418  (132,764  -    (30,417)  (73,418)  (132,764)

Dividends paid

  (32,138  (30,168  (31,660  (44,144)  (32,138)  (30,168)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used by financing activities

  (192  (35,467  (25,772  (60,644)  (192)  (35,467)
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (15,139  (2,849  2,697    10,357   (15,139)  (2,849)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  56,167    59,016    56,319    41,028   56,167   59,016 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $41,028   $56,167   $59,016   $51,385  $41,028  $56,167 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation:     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Worthington Industries, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or the “Company”). Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), in which we own a 52% controlling interest, Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), in which we own a 60% controlling interest, and PSI Energy Solutions, LLC (“PSI”), in which we own a 75% controlling interest, are fully consolidated with the equity owned by the respective other joint venture member shown as noncontrolling interest in our consolidated balance sheets, and the respective other joint venture member’s portion of net earnings shown as net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statements of earnings.

Deconsolidation of The Gerstenslager Company:    On May 9, 2011, The Gerstenslager Company (“Gerstenslager”), the business unit comprising our Automotive Body Panels operating segment, closed an agreement with International Tooling Solutions, LLC, a tooling design and build company, to combine certain assets in a newly-formed joint venture, ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”).

Our contribution to ArtiFlex included all of our automotive body panels operations. However, we retained the accounts receivable and employee benefit obligations outstanding as of the closing date. In addition, we retained the land and building of Gerstenslager’s manufacturing facility located in Wooster, Ohio (the “Wooster Facility”), which became the subject of a lease agreement with ArtiFlex upon closing of the transaction. As a result of the change in our intended use of these long-lived assets, an impairment charge of $6,414,000 was recorded within the joint venture transactions caption in our fiscal 2011 consolidated statement of earnings.

In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 50% interest in ArtiFlex and certain cash and other consideration. As more fully described in “Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” our investment in ArtiFlex is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ArtiFlex, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective May 9, 2011, resulting in a one-time gain of $15,040,000. Consistent with the impairment charges incurred in connection with the transaction, this gain was recorded within the joint venture transactions caption in our fiscal 2011 consolidated statement of earnings.

The following table summarizes the consideration received, the consideration transferred and the resulting net gain on deconsolidation:

 

(in thousands)    

Consideration received (at fair value):

  

Interest in ArtiFlex

  $28,404  

Cash and other consideration

   9,235  
  

 

 

 

Total consideration received

   37,639  

Consideration transferred (at book value)

   22,599  
  

 

 

 

Gain on deconsolidation

   15,040  

Less: Impairment of long-lived assets

   6,414  
  

 

 

 

Net gain on deconsolidation

  $8,626  
  

 

 

 

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ArtiFlex was recorded at its fair value as of the closing date. For additional information regarding the fair value of our interest in ArtiFlex, refer to “Note P – Fair Value Measurements.”

Deconsolidation of Dietrich Metal Framing:    On March 1, 2011, we closed an agreement with Marubeni-Itochu Steel America Inc. (“MISA”) to combine certain assets of Dietrich Metal Framing (“Dietrich”) and ClarkWestern Building Systems LLC,Inc., in a newly-formed joint venture, ClarkWesternClarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”).

Our contribution to ClarkDietrich consisted of our metal framing business, including all of the related working capital and six of the 13 facilities. We retained and continued to operate the remaining metal framing facilities through August 31, 2011,(the “retained facilities”), on a short-term basis, to support the transition of the business into ClarkDietrich. All of these facilities were closed as of August 31, 2011 and the new joint venture. The buildingassociated buildings and equipment associated withof the majority of these facilities were sold during fiscal 2012. The remaining facilitiesassets, which have a carrying value of $3,040,000 and consist of property, plant and equipment, are expected to be sold duringbefore the end of the fiscal 2013 and actions to locate buyers are ongoing. As the other relevant criteria for classification as assets held for sale have been satisfied, the $7,202,000 carrying value of these asset groups, which consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, is presented separately in our consolidated balance sheet as ofyear ending May 31, 2012.2014 (“fiscal 2014”).

As a result of the change in our intended use of these long-lived assets, an impairment charge of $18,293,000 was recognized within the joint venture transactions line in our consolidated statements of earnings during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Refer to “Note P – Fair Value Measurements” for additional information regarding this impairment charge.

In connection with this transaction, approximately $11,216,000 of restructuring charges were recognized during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, consisting of $7,183,000 of employee severance and $4,033,000 post-closure facility exit and other costs. These restructuring charges were also recorded within the joint venture transactions line in our fiscal 2011 consolidated statement of earnings.

In exchange for the contributed net assets, we received a 25% interest in ClarkDietrich and the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. (“MMI”) steel processing locations. As more fully described in “Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates,” our investment in ClarkDietrich is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest. As we do not have a controlling financial interest in ClarkDietrich, the contributed net assets were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, resulting in a one-time gain of $31,319,000. Consistent with the impairment and restructuring charges incurred in connection with this transaction, this gain was recorded within the joint venture transactions caption in our fiscal 2011 consolidated statement of earnings.

The following table summarizes the consideration received, the consideration transferred and the resulting net gain on the deconsolidation:

 

(in thousands)    

Consideration received (at fair value):

  

MMI steel processing assets

  $72,600  

Interest in ClarkDietrich

   58,250  

Receivable for excess working capital

   4,862  
  

 

 

 

Total consideration received

   135,712  

Consideration transferred (at book value)

   104,393  
  

 

 

 

Gain on deconsolidation

   31,319  

Less: Impairment of long-lived assets

   18,293  

Restructuring charges

   11,216  
  

 

 

 

Net gain on deconsolidation

  $1,810  
  

 

 

 

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ClarkDietrich was recorded at its fair value as of the closing date. For additional information regarding the fair value of our interest in ClarkDietrich, refer to “Note P – Fair Value Measurements.”

Refer to “Note N – Acquisitions” for additional information regarding the accounting for the MMI steel processing assets acquired.

Use of Estimates:    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:    We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Inventories:    Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method for all inventories. We believe our inventories were valued appropriately as of May 31, 20122013 and May 31, 2011.2012.

Derivative Financial Instruments:    We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to certain risks related to our ongoing operations. The primary risks managed through the use of derivative instruments include interest rate risk, currency exchange risk and commodity price risk. All derivative instruments are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. Gains and losses on fair value hedges are recognized in current period earnings in the same line as the underlying hedged item. The effective portion of gains and losses on cash flow hedges areis deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and are recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings, in the same financial statement caption as the underlying hedged item. Ineffectiveness of the hedges during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013 (“fiscal 2013”), the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 (“fiscal 2012”), and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (“fiscal 2011”) and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”) was immaterial. Classification in the consolidated statements of earnings of gains and losses related to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting is determined based on the underlying intent of the instruments. Cash flows related to derivative instruments are generally classified as operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

In order for hedging relationships to qualify for hedge accounting under current accounting guidance, we formally document each hedging relationship and its risk management objective. This documentation includes the hedge strategy, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how hedge effectiveness will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively as well as a description of the method used to measure hedge ineffectiveness.

Derivative instruments are executed only with highly rated financial institutions. No credit loss is anticipated on existing instruments, and no such material losses have been experienced to date. We continue to monitor our positions, as well as the credit ratings of counterparties to those positions.

We discontinue hedge accounting when it is determined that the derivative instrument is no longer effective in offsetting the hedged risk, expires or is sold, is terminated or is no longer designated as a hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur or we determine that designation of the hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative instrument is retained, we continue to carry the derivative instrument at its fair value on the consolidated balance sheet and recognize any subsequent changes in its fair value in net earnings immediately. When it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, we discontinue hedge accounting and immediately recognize the gains and losses that were accumulated in AOCI.

Refer to “Note OP – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding the consolidated balance sheet location and the risk classification of our derivative instruments.

Risks and Uncertainties:    As of May 31, 2012,2013, we, together with our unconsolidated affiliates, operated 7983 production facilities in 1924 states and 1211 countries. Our largest market is the automotive market, which

comprised 34%32% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2012.2013. Our foreign operations represented 8%7% of consolidated net sales, 4%1% of pre-tax earnings attributable to controlling interest, and 30%19% of consolidated net assets as of and for the year ended May 31, 2012.2013. As of May 31, 2012,2013, approximately 6%7% of our consolidated labor force was represented by collective bargaining agreements. The concentration of credit risks from financial instruments related to the markets we serve is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or future results of operations.

In fiscal 2012,2013, our largest customer accounted for approximately 5% of our consolidated net sales, and our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 24%25% of our consolidated net sales. A significant loss of, or decrease in, business from any of these customers could have an adverse effect on our sales and financial results if we cannot obtain replacement business. Also, due to consolidation within the industries we serve, including the construction, automotive and retail industries, our sales may be increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse developments with respect to, one or more of our largest customers.

Our principal raw material is flat-rolled steel, which we purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole has been cyclical, and at times availability and pricing can be volatile due to a number of factors beyond our control. This volatility can significantly affect our steel costs. In an environment of increasing prices for steel and other raw materials, in general, competitive conditions may impact how much of the price increases we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are unable to pass on future price increases in our raw materials to our customers, our financial results could be adversely affected. Also, if steel prices decrease, in general, competitive conditions may impact how quickly we must reduce our prices to our customers and we could be forced to use higher-priced raw materials to complete orders for which the selling prices have decreased. Declining steel prices could also require us to write-down the value of our inventories to reflect current market pricing. Further, the number of suppliers has decreased in recent years due to industry consolidation and the financial difficulties of certain suppliers, and consolidation may continue. Accordingly, if delivery from a major steel supplier is disrupted, it may be more difficult to obtain an alternative supply than in the past.

Receivables:    We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are properly valued and collectible. This is accomplished through two contra-receivable accounts: returns and allowances and allowance for doubtful accounts. Returns and allowances, including limited warranties on certain products, are used to record estimates of returns or other allowances resulting from quality, delivery, discounts or other issues affecting the value of receivables. This account is estimated based on historical trends and current market conditions, with the offset to net sales. The portion of the liability related to product warranties was immaterial at May 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is used to record the estimated risk of loss related to the customers’ inability to pay. This allowance is maintained at a level that we consider appropriate based on factors that affect collectability, such as the financial health of our customers, historical trends of charge-offs and recoveries and current economic and market conditions. As we monitor our receivables, we identify customers that may have payment problems, and we adjust the allowance accordingly, with the offset to selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when recovery is considered remote. The allowance for doubtful accounts decreasedincreased approximately $821,000$79,000 during fiscal 20122013 to $3,329,000.$3,408,000.

While we believe our allowances are adequate, changes in economic conditions, the financial health of customers and bankruptcy settlements could impact our future earnings. If the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction end markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required.

Property and Depreciation:    Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 10 to 40 years and machinery and

equipment over 3 to 20 years. Depreciation expense was $56,002,000, $50,644,000, $57,765,000 and $60,529,000$57,765,000 during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, andrespectively. The increase in depreciation expense in fiscal 2010, respectively.2013 resulted from the impact of acquisitions. The decrease in depreciation expense in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 resulted largely from the deconsolidation of Dietrich and Gerstenslager in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Accelerated depreciation methods are used for income tax purposes.

Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets:    We use the purchase method of accounting for anyall business combinations initiated after June 30, 2002, and recognize amortizable intangible assets separately from goodwill. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities in an acquisition are measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets. A bargain purchase may occur, wherein the fair value of identifiable net assets exceeds the purchase price, and a gain is then recognized in the amount of that excess. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may be present. Application of goodwill impairment testing involves judgment, including but not limited to, the identification of reporting units and estimation of the fair value of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that the characteristics of the reporting units within each operating segment are similar and allow for their aggregation in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of each operating segment, determined using discounted cash flows, to each operating segment’s respective carrying value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment is indicated. The amount of the impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of the net assets of the operating segment, excluding goodwill, to its estimated fair value, with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is lower than its carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated statements of earnings.

We performed our annual impairment evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 and concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized. However, futureAs expected, the estimated fair value of the Engineered Cabs operating segment, which was formed in connection with the recent acquisition of Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”) and had goodwill of $44,933,000 at May 31, 2013, exceeded its carrying value by less than 10%. A 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate for this operating segment could decrease the fair value by enough to result in some impairment based on the current forecast model. Future declines in the market and deterioration in earnings could lead to impairment charges in subsequent periods.performing a step 2 calculation to quantify a potential impairment.

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Impairment testing involves a comparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be recognized. The loss recognized is equal to the amount that the carrying value of the asset or asset group exceeds fair value.

Our impairment testing for both goodwill and other long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, is largely based on cash flow models that require significant judgment and require

assumptions about future volume trends, revenue and expense growth rates; and, in addition, external factors

such as changes in economic trends and cost of capital. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could

impact the outcomes of the tests performed. See “Note C – Goodwill and Other IntangibleLong-Lived Assets” for additional details regarding these assets and related impairment testing.

Leases:    Certain lease agreements contain fluctuating or escalating payments and rent holiday periods. The related rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease term. Leasehold improvements made by the lessee, whether funded by the lessee or by landlord allowances or incentives, are recorded as leasehold improvement assets and will be amortized over the shorter of the economic life or the lease term. These incentives are also recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions in rent expense over the lease term.

Stock-Based Compensation:    At May 31, 2012,2013, we had stock-based compensation plans for our employees as well as our non-employee directors as described more fully in “Note IJ – Stock-Based Compensation.” All share-based awards, including grants of stock options, are recorded as expense in the consolidated statements of earnings based on their grant-date fair values.

Revenue Recognition:    We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss provided evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable and the ability to collect is probable. We provide, through charges to net sales, for returns and allowances based on experience and current customer activities. We also provide, through charges to net sales, for customer rebates and sales discounts based on specific agreements and recent and anticipated levels of customer activity. In circumstances where the collection of payment is not probable at the time of shipment, we defer recognition of revenue until payment is collected.

The business units that comprise the Worthington Global Group (the “Global Group”)Construction Services operating segment, which have contributed less than 5% of consolidated net sales for each of the last three fiscal years, recognize revenue on a percentage-of-completion method. Refer to “Note MN – Segment Data” for additional information.

Advertising Expense:    We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $6,179,000, $4,788,000, $3,817,000 and $3,838,000$3,817,000 for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs:    Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales, and shipping and handling costs incurred are included in cost of goods sold.

Environmental Costs:    Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the property, increase its capacity, and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and clean up are charged to expense.

Statements of Cash Flows:    Supplemental cash flow information was as follows for the fiscal years ended May 31:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

  $18,281    $17,358    $9,814    $22,614   $18,281   $17,358 

Income taxes paid, net of (refunds)

   46,445     53,194     (1,601

Income taxes paid, net of refunds

   64,260    46,445    53,194 

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows as operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of the cumulative equity in the net earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Income Taxes:    We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of

temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and the financial reporting basis of our assets

and liabilities. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some, or a portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized.

Tax benefits from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the consolidated financial statements are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

We have reserves for taxes and associated interest and penalties that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by taxing authorities. It is our policy to record these in income tax expense. While we believe the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are appropriate, we have established the tax and interest reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge our positions. The tax reserves are analyzed periodically, and adjustments are made as events occur to warrant adjustment to the reserves, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues and release of administrative guidance or court decisions affecting a particular tax issue.

Self-Insurance Reserves:    We are largely self-insured with respect to workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability, property damage, employee medical claims and other potential losses. In order to reduce risk and better manage our overall loss exposure, we purchase stop-loss insurance that covers individual claims in excess of the deductible amounts. We maintain reserves for the estimated cost to settle open claims, which includes estimates of legal costs expected to be incurred, as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that has been incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on actuarial valuations that take into consideration the historical average claim volume, the average cost for settled claims, current trends in claim costs, changes in our business and workforce, general economic factors and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimated reserves for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from assumptions used and historical trends.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:    In December 2011, new accounting guidance was issued that establishes certain additional disclosure requirements about financial instruments and derivativesderivative instruments that are subject to netting arrangements. The new disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those periods. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that resulted in common fair value measurements and disclosures under both U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This amended guidance is explanatory in nature and does not require additional fair value measurements nor is it intended to result in significant changes in the application of current guidance. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance on March 1, 2012, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This new guidance requires entities to present reclassification adjustments included in other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements and allows entities to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. It also eliminates the option for entities to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. For public companies, this accounting guidance iswas effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning after

December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. Retrospective application to prior periods is required. The adoptionWe adopted the effective provisions of this new accounting guidance effective for us on June 1, 2012 will not impact our financial position or resultsand have provided the required statements of operations.comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. In December 2011, certain provisions of this new guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income were temporarily deferred to a laterdeferred. In February 2013, an effective date was established for the provisions that has yet to be determined.had been deferred. These provisions are effective prospectively for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after

December 15, 2012. We are in the process of determining our method of presentation; however, we do not anticipateexpect the adoption of this new accounting guidance willthese provisions, which relate to presentation only, to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, amended accounting guidance was issued that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The two-step quantitative impairment test is required only if, based on its qualitative assessment, an entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this amended accounting guidance did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, amended accounting guidance was issued that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amended guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative test unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In March 2013, amended accounting guidance was issued regarding the accounting for cumulative translation adjustment. The amended guidance specifies that a cumulative translation adjustment should be released from earnings when an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a group of assets within a consolidated foreign entity and the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity. For sales of an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment attributable to the investment would be recognized in earnings upon sale of the investment. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this amended accounting guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

Our investments in affiliated companies that we do not control, either through majority ownership or otherwise, are accounted for using the equity method. At May 31, 2012,2013, these equity investments and the percentage interests owned consisted of: ArtiFlex (50%), ClarkDietrich (25%), Gestamp Worthington Wind Steel, LLC (the “Gestamp JV”) (50%), Samuel Steel Pickling Company (31%(31.25%), Serviacero Planos, S. de R. L. de C.V. (50%), TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”) (45%), Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”) (50%), Worthington Modern Steel Framing Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (“WMSFMCo.”) (40%), and Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”) (51%). WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

Due to the volatile political environment in the United States, particularly in regards to the Federal Production Tax Credit, the Company is in the process of dissolving the Gestamp JV.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we determined our 40% ownership interest in our construction joint venture in China, WMSFMCo., was other than temporarily impaired due to current and projected operating losses. As a result, an impairment charge of $4,751,000, representing the carrying value of the investment, was recognized within equity income in our consolidated statement of earnings.

In September 2012, the parent company of ThyssenKrupp Steel North America, Inc., the other member of our tailored steel blanks joint venture, TWB, announced that it had reached an agreement to sell its interest in the joint venture to Wuhan Iron and Steel Corporation. The sale is subject to approval by the supervisory bodies and responsible regulatory authorities.

During January 2012, we sold our 49% equity interest in LEFCO Worthington, LLC, to the other member of the joint venture. The impact of this transaction was immaterial.

On May 9, 2011, we joined with International Tooling Solutions, LLC to form ArtiFlex, a joint venture that provides an integrated solution for engineering, tooling, stamping, assembly and other services to customers primarily in the automotive industry. We contributed our automotive body panels business in exchange for a 50% ownership interest. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our investment in ArtiFlex was recognized at fair value based on the total enterprise fair value of the joint venture of approximately $56,808,000. This amount exceeded the book value of the underlying equity in the net assets of the joint venture by approximately $31,098,000. Our share of this excess fair value, or cost, is included within the carrying value of our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate and recognized as an adjustment to equity income in periods subsequent to acquisition. We attributed this excess fair value to the following assets:

(in thousands)    

Inventories (1)

  $1,900  

Intangible assets (2)

   8,200  

Property, plant and equipment, net (3)

   8,198  
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   18,298  

Equity method goodwill (4)

   12,800  
  

 

 

 

Total excess fair value

  $31,098  
  

 

 

 

(1)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income as the related inventories are sold.

(2)

Includes $7,500,000 related to definite-lived intangible assets. This amount will be amortized to equity income over the estimated useful lives of those assets. The remaining $700,000 relates to intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, which will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

(3)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income over the estimated useful lives of the related assets in a manner consistent with depreciation.

(4)

Will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

On March 18, 2011, we joined with Gestamp Renewables group to create the Gestamp JV, a 50%-owned joint venture focused on producing towers for wind turbines being constructed in North America. The Gestamp JV planned to construct its initial production facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming; however, due to the volatile political environment in the United States, particularly in regards to the Federal Production Tax Credit, construction of this facility has been placed on hold. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

On March 1, 2011, we joined with ClarkWestern Building Systems, Inc. to form ClarkDietrich, a joint venture that manufactures a full line of drywall studs and accessories, structural studs and joists, metal lath and accessories, and shaft wall studs and track used primarily in residential and commercial construction. We contributed our metal framing business and related working capital in exchange for a 25% ownership interest in ClarkDietrich in addition to the assets of certain MISA Metals, Inc. steel processing locations. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our investment in ClarkDietrich was recognized at fair value based on the total enterprise fair value of the joint venture of approximately $233,000,000. This amount exceeded the book value of the underlying equity in the net assets of the joint venture by approximately $20,320,000. Our share of this excess fair value, or cost, is included within the carrying value of our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate and recognized as an adjustment to equity income in periods subsequent to acquisition. We attributed this excess fair value to the following assets:

(in thousands)    

Inventories (1)

  $15,000  

Intangible assets (2)

   14,400  

Property, plant and equipment, net (3)

   (10,180
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   19,220  

Equity method goodwill (4)

   1,100  
  

 

 

 

Total excess fair value

  $20,320  
  

 

 

 

(1)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income as the related inventories are sold.

(2)

Includes $8,960,000 related to definite-lived intangible assets. This amount will be amortized to equity income over the estimated useful lives of those assets. The remaining $5,440,000 relates to intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, which will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

(3)

Recognized as an adjustment to equity income over the estimated useful lives of the related assets in a manner consistent with depreciation.

(4)

Will be reviewed for impairment in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance and, to the extent impaired, recognized as a reduction to equity income.

On November 19, 2010, we joined with Hubei Modern Urban Construction and Development Group Co., Ltd. to create WMSFMCo. We contributed approximately $6,100,000 of cash in exchange for a 40% ownership interest. The purpose of WMSFMCo. is to design, manufacture, assemble and distribute steel framing

materials and accessories for construction projects in five Central Chinese provinces and to provide project management and building design and construction supply services thereto. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

Worthington acquired certain assets from Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Gibraltar”) on February 1, 2010. Included in the assets acquired was a 31.25% ownership interest in Samuel Steel Pickling Company, a joint venture which operates a steel pickling facility in Twinsburg, Ohio, and another in Cleveland, Ohio. Our investment in this joint venture is accounted for under the equity method, as our ownership interest does not constitute a controlling financial interest.

We received distributions from unconsolidated affiliates totaling $84,539,000, $138,471,000 $57,146,000 and $52,970,000$57,146,000 in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively, including a one-time special dividend of $50,000,000 in connection with a refinancing transaction completed by WAVE in December 2011. We have received cumulative distributions from WAVE in excess of our investment balance, which resulted in an amount recorded within other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets of $69,165,000$63,187,000 and $10,715,000$69,165,000 at May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, we reclassify the negative balance to the liability section of our consolidated balance sheet. We will continue to record our equity in the net income of WAVE as a debit to the investment account, and if it becomes positive, it will again be shown as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet. If it becomes probable that any excess distribution may not be returned (upon joint venture liquidation or otherwise), we will recognize any balance classified as a liability as income immediately.

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows as operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of the cumulative equity in the net earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

The following table presents combined information of the financial position for affiliated companies accounted for using the equity method as of May 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Current assets

  $626,975    $597,222  

Cash

  $70,380    $73,416  

Receivable from partner (1)

   69,706     60,383  

Other current assets

   518,262     493,176  

Noncurrent assets

   345,500     260,805     350,681     345,500  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $972,475    $858,027    $1,009,029    $972,475  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Current liabilities

  $174,016    $184,467    $181,111    $161,907  

Short-term borrowings

   21,369     12,109  

Current maturities of long-term debt

   5,305     -     5,442     5,305  

Long-term debt

   289,308     150,229     274,750     289,308  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   21,934     5,365     18,345     21,934  

Equity

   481,912     517,966     508,012     481,912  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $972,475    $858,027    $1,009,029    $972,475  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(1)

Represents cash owed from a joint venture partner as a result of centralized cash management.

The following table presents financial results of our three largest affiliated companies for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. All other affiliated companies are combined and presented in the Other category.

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Net sales

            

WAVE

  $364,530    $346,717    $319,821    $370,702   $364,530   $346,717 

ClarkDietrich

   564,624     165,807     -     547,971    564,624    165,807 

TWB

   312,943     272,191     220,500     344,065    312,943    272,191 

Other

   443,646     249,716     168,458     490,996    443,646    249,716 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

  $1,685,743    $1,034,431    $708,779    $1,753,734   $1,685,743   $1,034,431 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross margin

            

WAVE

  $163,563    $154,194    $146,045    $167,924   $155,246   $144,499 

ClarkDietrich

   61,703     17,115     -     75,580    61,703    16,926 

TWB

   42,124     34,756     29,753     41,116    40,098    33,187 

Other

   62,758     32,018     13,824     48,229    57,346    30,817 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total gross margin

  $330,148    $238,083    $189,622    $332,849   $314,393   $225,429 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Operating income

            

WAVE

  $127,305    $116,295    $111,524    $137,202   $127,305   $116,295 

ClarkDietrich

   27,094     8,323     -     35,024    27,094    8,323 

TWB

   28,141     21,470     14,982     28,241    28,141    21,470 

Other

   38,473     22,056     4,660     30,457    38,473    22,056 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total operating income

  $221,013    $168,144    $131,166    $230,924   $221,013   $168,144 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

            

WAVE

  $4,142    $3,991    $3,767    $3,919   $4,142   $3,991 

ClarkDietrich

   14,271     8     -     18,173    14,271    8 

TWB

   3,259     3,900     3,783     5,123    3,259    3,900 

Other

   12,481     3,553     3,140     13,497    12,481    3,553 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization

  $34,153    $11,452    $10,690    $40,712   $34,153   $11,452 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Interest expense

            

WAVE

  $3,427    $1,375    $1,366    $6,280   $3,427   $1,375 

ClarkDietrich

   3     -     -     3    3    - 

TWB

   -     -     -     -    -    - 

Other

   2,617     137     116     2,611    2,617    137 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total interest expense

  $6,047    $1,512    $1,482    $8,894   $6,047   $1,512 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax expense

            

WAVE

  $2,789    $2,669    $2,457    $2,451   $2,789    $2,669 

ClarkDietrich

   -     -     -     -    -     - 

TWB

   5,458     4,233     1,408     1,218    5,458     4,233 

Other

   6,867     3,224     1,760     3,187    6,867     3,224 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total income tax expense

  $15,114    $10,126    $5,625    $6,856   $15,114    $10,126 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net earnings

            

WAVE

  $121,261    $112,544    $107,776    $128,614   $121,261    $112,544 

ClarkDietrich

   27,203     8,331     -     35,005    27,203     8,331 

TWB

   22,952     18,022     14,469     27,931    22,952     18,022 

Other

   30,317     17,782     5,592     24,452    30,317     17,782 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net earnings

  $201,733    $156,679    $127,837    $216,002   $201,733    $156,679 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At May 31, 2012, $32,958,0002013, $40,674,000 of our consolidated retained earnings represented undistributed earnings, net of tax, of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Note C — Goodwill and Other IntangibleLong-Lived Assets

Goodwill

The following table summarized the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 by reportable business segment:

 

  Pressure
Cylinders
 Engineered
Cabs
   Metal
Framing
 Other Total   Pressure
Cylinders
 Engineered
Cabs
 Other Total 
(in thousands)                        

Balance at May 31, 2010

       

Goodwill

  $79,543   $-    $96,943   $24,651   $201,137  

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    -     (96,943  (24,651  (121,594
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
   79,543    -     -    -    79,543  

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   11,536    -     -    -    11,536  

Translation adjustments

   2,554    -     -    -    2,554  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2011

            

Goodwill

   93,633    -     96,943    24,651    215,227    $93,633  $-  $121,594  $215,227 

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    -     (96,943  (24,651  (121,594   -   -   (121,594)  (121,594)
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
   93,633    -     -    -    93,633    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

    93,633   -   -   93,633 

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   17,730    45,230     -    5,651    68,611     17,730   45,230   5,651   68,611 

Translation adjustments

   (5,563  -     -    -    (5,563   (5,563)  -   -   (5,563)
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2012

            

Goodwill

   105,800    45,230     96,943    30,302    278,275     105,800   45,230   127,245   278,275 

Accumulated impairment losses

   -    -     (96,943  (24,651  (121,594   -   -   (121,594)  (121,594)
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  $105,800   $45,230    $-   $5,651   $156,681     105,800   45,230   5,651   156,681 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Acquisitions and purchase accounting adjustments

   57,010   (297)  -   56,713 

Divestitures

   (1,131)  -   -   (1,131)

Translation adjustments

   1,595   -   -   1,595 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2013

     

Goodwill

   163,274   44,933   127,245   335,452 

Accumulated impairment losses

   -   -   (121,594)  (121,594)
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  $163,274  $44,933  $5,651  $213,858 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The increase in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 resulted primarily from acquisitions completed during those respective fiscal years. For additional information regarding these acquisitions, refer to “Note NO – Acquisitions.”

Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from one to 20 years. The following table summarizes other intangible assets by class as of May 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

  2012   2011   2013   2012 
(in thousands)  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
   Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
   Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
   Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

                

Trademarks

  $27,581    $-    $850    $-    $27,581   $-   $27,581   $- 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

   27,581     -     850     -     27,581    -    27,581    - 

Definite-lived intangible assets:

                

Patents and trademarks

   4,232     1,123     4,184     2,707    $15,111    2,201   $4,232    1,123 

Customer relationships

   74,521     12,032     23,587     7,935     113,098    18,967    74,521    12,032 

Non-compete agreements

   5,383     2,111     1,893     1,525     11,669    3,427    5,383    2,111 

Other

   4,719     837     2,132     521     6,354    2,074    4,719    837 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total definite-lived intangible assets

   88,855     16,103     31,796     12,688     146,232    26,669    88,855    16,103 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $116,436    $16,103    $32,646    $12,688    $173,813   $26,669   $116,436   $16,103 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The increase in the carrying amount of other intangible assets resulted primarily from acquisitions completed during fiscal 2012.2013. For additional information regarding these acquisitions, refer to “Note NO – Acquisitions.”

Amortization expense of $10,467,000, $5,229,000, $3,293,000 and $4,124,000$3,293,000 was recognized during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively.

Amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is estimated to be:

 

(in thousands)        

2013

  $7,518  

2014

   7,503    $15,641 

2015

   7,313     15,178 

2016

   7,021     14,715 

2017

   6,585     13,646 

2018

   13,023  

Other Long-Lived Assets

Fiscal 2013:    During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, due to current and projected operating losses at our 60%-owned consolidated joint venture in India, WNCL, we determined that certain indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long-range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $6,856,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $4,968,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. The portion of this impairment loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest, or $1,987,000, is recorded within net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statement of earnings.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, our Pressure Cylinders operations in Czech Republic met the applicable criteria for classification as assets held for sale. The net book value of this asset group was determined to be in excess of fair value, and, as a result, this asset group was written down to its fair value less

cost to sell, or $6,934,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,570,000. On October 31, 2012, we completed the sale of this asset group to an unrelated third party resulting in a gain of approximately $50,000. The combined impact of these items of $1,520,000 is presented within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings.

Fiscal 2012:    During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Construction Services operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $225,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $355,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings.

Note D — Restructuring and Other Expense

In fiscal 2008, we initiated a Transformation Plan (the “Transformation Plan”) with the overall goal to improve our sustainable earnings potential, asset utilization and operational performance. The Transformation Plan focuses on cost reduction, margin expansion and organizational capability improvements and, in the process, seeks to drive excellence in three core competencies: sales; operations; and supply chain management. The Transformation Plan is comprehensive in scope and includes aggressive diagnostic and implementation phases. As a result of the Transformation Plan and its related efforts, we have incurred certain asset impairments which have been included within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings. Asset impairment charges that are not a result of these efforts have been included within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statements of earnings, except for the impairment charges incurred in connection with the formations of the unconsolidated joint ventures, ArtiFlex and ClarkDietrich, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. As more fully discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” theseThese impairment charges were recognized within the joint venture transactions linecaption in our consolidated statements of earnings.

To date, we have completed the transformation phases in each of the core facilities within our Steel Processing operating segment, including the facilities of our Mexican joint venture. We also substantially completed the transformation phases at our metal framing facilities prior to their contribution to ClarkDietrich. Transformation efforts within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, which began during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, are ongoing. In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated the diagnostics phase of the Transformation Plan in our Engineered Cabs operating segment.

When this process began, we retained a consulting firm to assist in the development and implementation of the Transformation Plan. As the Transformation Plan progressed, we formed internal teams dedicated to this effort, and they ultimately assumed full responsibility for executing the Transformation Plan. Although the consulting firm was again engaged as we rolled out the Transformation Plan in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, most of the work is now being done by our internal teams. These internal teams are now an integral part of our business and constitute what we refer to as the Centers of Excellence (“COE”). The COE will continue to monitor the performance metrics and new processes instituted across our transformed operations and drive continuous improvements in all areas of our operations. The majority of the expenses related to the COE will be included in selling, general and administrative expense going forward, except where they relate to a first time diagnostics phase of the Transformation Plan.

Since the initiation

A progression of the Transformation Plan,liabilities associated with our restructuring activities, combined with a reconciliation to the following actions have been taken:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, an initial headcount reduction plan was put into place, utilizing a combination of voluntary retirement and severance packages. A total of 63 individuals were impacted.

On September 25, 2007, we announced the closure or downsizing of five locations in our Metal Framing segment. These actions were completed as of May 31, 2008 and included headcount reductions of 165.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Metal Framing corporate offices were moved from Pittsburgh and Blairsville, Pennsylvania, to Columbus, Ohio. Headcount was reduced by 33.

On October 23, 2008, we announced the closure of two facilities, one Steel Processing (Louisville, Kentucky) and one Metal Framing (Renton, Washington), as well as headcount reductions of 282. The Louisville facility was closed on February 28, 2009, and the Renton facility closed on December 31, 2008. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the remaining assets of the Louisville facility were sold, resulting in a gain of $1,003,000. This gain has been classified within restructuring and other expense line in our consolidated statementsstatement of earnings for fiscal 2013, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  Beginning
Balance
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments   Ending
Balance
 

Early retirement and severance

  $4,892   $2,228  $(2,388) $297   $5,029 

Facility exit and other costs

   691    2,347   (2,378)  540    1,200 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $5,583    4,575  $(4,766) $837   $6,229 
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net gain on dispositions

     (1,886)    

Less: joint venture transactions

     604     
    

 

 

     

Restructuring and other expense

    $3,293     
    

 

 

     

Approximately $4,741,000 of the total liability is expected to be paid in fiscal 2014. The remaining liability, which consists of lease termination costs and certain severance benefits, will be paid through September 2016.

During fiscal 2013, the following actions were taken in connection with the Transformation Plan:

In connection with the wind-down of our former Metal Framing operating segment:

Approximately $1,546,000 of facility exit and other costs were incurred in connection with the closure of the retained facilities.

The severance accrual was adjusted downward, resulting in a $264,000 credit to earnings.

 

On December 5, 2008, we announced the closure and/or suspension of operations at three Metal Framing facilities and headcount reductions in Steel Processing of 186. The Lunenburg, Massachusetts, facility closed and operations were suspended in Miami, Florida, and Phoenix, Arizona, on February 28, 2009. The associated headcount impact for Metal Framing was a reduction of 125.

The decision was made during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to close the Joliet, Illinois, Metal Framing facility. A majorityCertain assets of the roll forming operation located at that facility was moved to the Hammond, Indiana, facility during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Approximately $1,717,000 of impairment was recognized during fiscal 2010 related to this closure.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, additional headcount reductions took place across locations within the Metal Framing, Military Construction and Mid-Rise Construction operating segments. A total of 113 individuals were impacted.

Execution of the Transformation Plan continued throughout severalretained facilities in our Steel Processing and Metal Framing operating segments during fiscal 2011, resulting in $3,726,000 of expense, which was recorded within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

During fiscal 2011, certain assets within our Steel Processing operating segment classified as held for sale at May 31, 2010, were disposed of for cash proceeds of $5,637,000 resulting in a net gain of $828,000. Also during fiscal 2011,$1,886,000.

These items were recognized within the “joint venture transactions” financial statement caption in our consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with the formation of ClarkDietrich and the subsequent wind-down of our former Metal Framing operating segment.

certain assets within our Metal Framing operating segment were disposed of resulting in a net gain of $245,000. These gains were recorded within restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

 

On March 1, 2011, as more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” we completedIn connection with the contributionclosure of our metal framingcommercial stairs business, including sixwe incurred net charges of the 13 facilities, to ClarkDietrich. As a resultapproximately $1,530,000, consisting of the planned closure$1,624,000 of the retained facilities, approximately $7,183,000 of employee severance and $4,033,000 of post-closure facility exit and other costs were recognized during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.and a $94,000 credit to severance expense.

 

In connection with certain organizational changes impacting our former Global Group operating segment, we accrued approximately $98,000 of employee severance. For further information regarding these organizational changes, refer to “NOTE N – Segment Data.”

In connection with the sale of our Pressure Cylinders operations in Czech Republic, we recognized approximately $177,000 of facility exit and other costs.

In connection with the previously-announced consolidation of the BernzOmatic hand torch manufacturing operation in Medina, New York into the existing Pressure Cylinders’ facility in Chilton, Wisconsin, we recognized a $2,488,000 accrual for expected employee severance costs.

A progression of the liabilities associated with our restructuring activities, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2012, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  Beginning
Balance
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments   Ending
Balance
 

Early retirement and severance

  $7,220   $245  $(3,824) $1,251   $4,892 

Facility exit and other costs

   409    9,116   (9,630)  796    691 

Professional fees

   -    4,758   (4,758)  -    - 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $7,629    14,119  $(18,212) $2,047   $5,583 
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net gain on dispositions

     (8,285)    

Joint venture transactions

     150     
    

 

 

     

Restructuring and other expense

    $5,984     
    

 

 

     

The adjustment to the early retirement and severance line item above relates primarily to the reclassification of severance costs to be reimbursed by MISA in connection with the ClarkDietrich formation to the assets section of the balance sheet during fiscal 2012.

During fiscal 2012, the following additional actions were taken in connection with the Transformation Plan:

In connection with the wind-down of our metal framing business:

 

Approximately $9,116,000 of facility exit and other costs were incurred in connection with the closure of the retained facilities.

 

The severance accrual was adjusted downward, resulting in a $998,000 credit to earnings.

 

Certain assets of the retained facilities classified as held for sale were disposed of for cash proceeds of approximately $14,005,000 resulting in a net gain of approximately $5,417,000.

 

The assets of our Vinyl division, which were also classified as held for sale, were sold to our unconsolidated affiliate, ClarkDietrich, for cash proceeds of approximately $6,125,000 resulting in a gain of approximately $766,000.

 

Certain steel processing assets acquired in connection with the formation of ClarkDietrich and classified as held for sale were disposed of for cash proceeds of approximately $10,948,000 resulting in a gain of approximately $2,102,000.

These items were recognized within the joint venture transactions caption in our consolidated statements of earnings to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with the formation of ClarkDietrich and the subsequent wind-down of our Metal Framing operating segment.

 

During fiscal 2012, weWe engaged a consulting firm to assist with the ongoing transformation efforts within our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. As a result, we incurred professional fees of $4,758,000, which were classified as restructuring and other expense in our consolidated statements of earnings. Services provided included assistance through diagnostic tools, performance improvement technologies, project management techniques, benchmarking information and insights that directly related to the Transformation Plan.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we announced the closure of our commercial stairs business and accrued $1,143,000 of employee severance.

A progression of the liabilities created as part of the Transformation Plan, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2011, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  Beginning
Balance
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments  Ending
Balance
 

Early retirement and severance

  $893    $8,687   $(2,371 $11   $7,220  

Facility exit and other costs

   560     6,052    (6,030  (173  409  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $1,453     14,739   $(8,401 $(162 $7,629  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-cash charges

     203     

Net gain on dispositions

     (1,073   

Joint venture transactions

     (11,216   
    

 

 

    

Restructuring and other expense

    $2,653     
    

 

 

    

A progression of the liabilities created as part of the Transformation Plan, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense line in our consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal 2012, is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)  Beginning
Balance
   Expense  Payments  Adjustments   Ending
Balance
 

Early retirement and severance

  $7,220    $245   $(3,824 $1,251    $4,892  

Facility exit and other costs

   409     9,116    (9,630  796     691  

Professional fees

   -     4,758    (4,758  -     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $7,629     14,119   $(18,212 $2,047    $5,583  
  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net gain on dispositions

     (8,285    

Joint venture transactions

     150      
    

 

 

     

Restructuring and other expense

    $5,984      
    

 

 

     

The adjustment to the early retirement and severance line item above relates primarily to the reclassification of severance costs to be reimbursed by MISA in connection with the ClarkDietrich formation to the assets section of the balance sheet during fiscal 2012.

Note E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

Legal Proceedings

On January 27, 2012, the Fifth Appellate District of the Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling against the Company for professional negligence regarding the wrongful death of an employee of a third-party freight company. The lower court’s ruling awarded damages to the plaintiff of approximately $3,700,000; however, our overall exposure related to this matter is limited under our stop-loss insurance policy. As a result, we accrued an additional pre-tax charge of $1,500,000, which was recorded within SG&A expense during fiscal 2012.

InOn July 1, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of the BernzOmatic business (“Bernz”) of Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., we settled a dispute over our early termination of a supply contract for $10,000,000. Reserves previously recognized in connection with this matter totaled $14,402,000. Refer to “NOTE NO – Acquisitions” for additional information regarding our acquisition of Bernz.

We are defendants in certain other legal actions. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these actions, which is not clearly determinable at the present time, would not significantly affect our consolidated financial position or future results of operations. We also believe that environmental issues will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or future results of operations.

Pressure Cylinders Voluntary Product Recall

On January 10, 2012, we announced a voluntary recall of our MAP-PRO®, propylene and MAAP® cylinders and related hand torch kits. The recall is awas precautionary stepin nature and involvesinvolved a valve supplied by a third party that may leak when a torch or hose is disconnected from the cylinder. There have been no reported incidentsWe incurred $9,671,000 of fire or injury caused by this situation. In connection with this matter, we recorded certain accruals for our estimated probable costs during the quarter-ended November 30, 2011, consisting of $4,737,000 for product returns and $3,883,000 for recall-related costs. In addition, we wrote-off $1,051,000 of affected inventory.

A progression of the liabilities recorded in connection with this matter during fiscal 2012 is summarized in the following table:

(in thousands)  Beginning
Balance
   Reserves
Used
   Changes
in
Estimates
   Ending
Balance
 

Product returns

  $4,737    $(3,650  $(809  $278  

Recall-related costs

   3,883     (4,692   809     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $8,620    $(8,342  $-    $278  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

We believe these liabilities are sufficient to absorb our remaining direct costsexpenses related to the recall whichduring fiscal 2012. Due to higher product returns than initially anticipated, we expectincurred additional expenses of $2,571,000 related to be paidthe recall during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Recoveries,We are pursuing recovery from the supplier; however, recoveries, if any, will not be recorded until an agreement is reached with the supplier.

Purchase Commitments

To secure access to a facility used to regenerate acid used in certain Steel Processing locations, we have entered into unconditional purchase obligations with a third party under which three of our Steel Processing facilities deliver their spent acid for processing annually through the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. In addition, we are required to pay for freight and utilities used in regenerating the spent acid. Total net payments to this third party were $4,353,000, $4,347,000 and $4,270,000 for fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively. At May 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of future payments required under this arrangement for the next five fiscal years and thereafter was as follows:

(in thousands)    

2013

  $2,367  

2014

   2,367  

2015

   2,367  

2016

   2,367  

2017

   2,367  

Thereafter

   4,734  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $16,569  
  

 

 

 

We may terminate the unconditional purchase obligations at any time by purchasing this facility at its then fair market value.

Royalty Agreements

In connection with the acquisition of the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company, Inc. (“Coleman Cylinders”), we executed a trademark license agreement whereby we are required to make minimum annual royalty payments of $2,000,000 in exchange for the exclusive right to use certain Coleman trademarks within the United States and Canada in connection with our operation of the acquired business. For additional information regarding the acquisition of Coleman Cylinders, refer to “Note NO – Acquisitions.”

Note F – Guarantees

We do not have guarantees that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of May 31, 2012,2013, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which we have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately $14,940,000$13,967,000 at May 31, 2012.2013. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a $5,000,000 term loan held by one of our unconsolidated affiliates, ArtiFlex. Based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to these guarantees, and determined that the fair value of our obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material.

We also had in place $10,982,000$11,732,000 of outstanding stand-by letters of credit as of May 31, 2012.2013. These letters of credit were issued to third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at May 31, 2012.2013. The fair value of these guarantee instruments, based on premiums paid, was not material at May 31, 2012.2013.

Note G – Debt and Receivables Securitization

The following table summarizes our long-term debt and short-term borrowings outstanding at May 31:31, 2013 and 2012:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Short-term borrowings

  $274,923    $132,956    $113,728   $274,923 

Floating rate senior notes due December 17, 2014

   100,000     100,000     100,000    100,000 

6.50% senior notes due April 15, 2020

   149,871     149,854     149,888    149,871 

4.60% senior notes due August 10, 2024

   150,000    - 

Industrial revenue bonds due March 2013

   281     -     -    281 

Industrial revenue bonds due April 2019

   2,423     -     2,084 ��  2,423 

Secured term loan

   5,816     -     5,036    5,816 

Other

   400     400     320    400 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total debt

   533,714     383,210     521,056    533,714 

Less: current maturities and short-term borrowings

   276,252     132,956     114,820    276,252 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total long-term debt

  $257,462    $250,254    $406,236   $257,462 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

We maintain a revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”), which expires in January 2013.. The AR Facility was available throughout fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011.2012. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012,2013, we increaseddecreased our borrowing capacity under the AR Facility from $150,000,000 to $100,000,000 and extended its maturity to $150,000,000.January 2015. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $150,000,000$100,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-seller, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts

due to bankruptcy or other cause, and concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value. As of May 31, 2012,2013, the pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $150,000,000$100,000,000 limit, and $135,000,000$100,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the net proceeds received and outstanding at May 31, 2012 and 2011, or $135,000,000 and $90,000,000, respectively, have been classified as short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets. Facility fees of $983,000, $1,232,000, $1,148,000 and $1,172,000$1,148,000 were incurred during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively.

Short-term borrowings at May 31, 2012,2013, also included $135,610,000$8,295,000 of borrowings under our new $425,000,000 unsecured multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders which was executed on May 4, 2012. The Credit Facilitythat matures in May 2017 and replaced our $400,000,000 facility that was set to expire in May 2013.2017. Borrowings under the Credit Facility have maturities of less than one year. Interest rates on borrowings and related facility fees are based on our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings as assigned by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The average variable rate was 1.29%1.24% at May 31, 2012.2013. As discussed in “Note F – Guarantees,” we provided $10,982,000$11,732,000 in letters of credit for third-party beneficiaries as of May 31, 2012.2013. While not drawn against at May 31, 2012,2013, these letters of credit are issued against availability under the Credit Facility, leaving $278,408,000$404,973,000 available under the Credit Facility at May 31, 2012.2013.

The remaining balance of short-term borrowings at May 31, 2012,2013, consisted of $4,313,000$5,433,000 outstanding under a $9,500,000 credit facility maintained by our consolidated joint venture, WNCL. This credit facility matures in November 20122013 and bears interest at a variable rate. The applicable variable rate was 2.50%2.25% at May 31, 2012.2013.

At May 31, 2012,2013, we had $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured floating rate senior notes outstanding, which are due on December 17, 2014 (the “2014 Notes”) and bear interest at a variable rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 80 basis points. However, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby we receive interest on the $100,000,000 notional amount at the six-month LIBOR rate and we pay interest on the same notional amount at a fixed rate of 4.46%, effectively fixing the interest rate at 5.26%. See “Note OP – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding this interest rate swap agreement.

On April 13, 2010, we issued $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due on April 15, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.50%. The 2020 Notes were sold to the public at 99.890% of the principal amount thereof, to yield 6.515% to maturity. We used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the then outstanding borrowings under our multi-year revolving credit facility and amounts then outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility. The proceeds on the issuance of the 2020 Notes were reduced for debt discount ($165,000), payment of debt issuance costs ($1,535,000) and settlement of a hedging instrument entered into in anticipation of the issuance of the 2020 Notes ($1,358,000). The debt discount, debt issuance costs and the loss from treasury lock derivative are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets within long-term debt as a contra-liability, short- and long-term other assets and AOCI, respectively. Each will be recognized, through interest expense, in our consolidated statements of earnings over the term of the 2020 Notes.

On August 10, 2012, we issued $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due August 10, 2024 (the “2024 Notes”). The 2024 Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.60%. The net proceeds from this issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our multi-year revolving credit facility and amounts outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility.

In connection with the acquisition of Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”) on December 29, 2011, we assumed industrial revenue bonds (“IRBs”) issued by the South Dakota Economic Development Finance Authority that mature in April 2019 and had an outstanding principal balancesbalance of $620,000 and $2,490,000 and mature in March 2013 (the “2013 IRBs”) and April 2019 (the “2019 IRBs”), respectively. The 2013 IRBs require monthly payments of $28,000 and bear interest$2,084,000 at rates between 3.75% and 5.25%. The 2019May 31, 2013. These IRBs require monthly payments of approximately $31,000 and bear interest at rates between 2.75% and 5.00%. Refer to “Note NO – Acquisitions” for additional information regarding the acquisition of Angus.

On April 27, 2012, we executed a $5,880,000 seven-year term loan that matures on May 1, 2019 and requires monthly payments of $76,350. The loan bears interest at a rate of 2.49% and is secured by an aircraft that was purchased with its proceeds.

Maturities on long-term debt and short-term borrowings in the next five fiscal years, and the remaining years thereafter, are as follows:

 

(in thousands)        

2013

  $276,252  

2014

   1,172    $114,820 

2015

   101,202     101,203 

2016

   1,238     1,238 

2017

   1,274     1,274 

2018

   1,311 

Thereafter

   152,576     301,210 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $533,714    $521,056 
  

 

   

 

 

Note H – Comprehensive Income

Other Comprehensive Income:The following table summarizes the tax effects of each component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the fiscal years ended May 31:

  2013  2012  2011 
(in thousands) Before-
Tax
  Tax  Net-of-
Tax
  Before-
Tax
  Tax  Net-of-
Tax
  Before-
Tax
  Tax  Net-of-
Tax
 

Foreign currency translation

 $5,393   -  $5,393  $(17,930)  -  $(17,930) $13,046   -  $13,046 

Pension liability adjustment

  3,688   (1,415)  2,273   (14,216)  4,975   (9,241)  2,202   (760)  1,442 

Cash flow hedges

  1,461   (763)  698   (636)  318   (318)  (405)  563   158 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 $10,542  $(2,178) $8,364  $(32,782) $5,293  $(27,489) $14,843  $(197) $14,646 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:    The components of AOCI, net of tax, were as follows at May 31, 2013 and 2012:

(in thousands)  2013   2012 

Foreign currency translation

  $4,025   $(1,355)

Defined benefit pension liability

   (10,221)   (12,494)

Cash flow hedges

   (5,840)   (6,538)
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  $(12,036)  $(20,387)
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net losses of $1,604,000 (net of tax of $827,000), $1,245,000 (net of tax of $794,000), and $2,431,000 (net of tax of $1,487,000) were reclassified from AOCI for cash flow hedges in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, and fiscal 2011, respectively.

The estimated net amount of the existing losses in AOCI at May 31, 2013 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months is $2,660,000 (net of tax of $1,372,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2013, and will change before actual reclassification from AOCI to net earnings during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2014.

Note I – Equity

Preferred Shares: The Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended Articles of Incorporation authorize two classes of preferred shares and their relative voting rights. The Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. is empowered to determine the issue prices, dividend rates, amounts payable upon liquidation and other terms of the preferred shares when issued. No preferred shares are issued or outstanding.

Common Shares:    On June 29, 2011, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of our outstanding common shares. At May 31, 2012, 6,027,8322013, 5,102,832 common shares remained available for repurchase under this repurchase authorization. The common shares available for repurchase under the June 29, 2011 authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations and general economic conditions. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011,2012, we paid $73,418,000$30,417,000 and $132,764,000$73,418,000 to repurchase 4,466,970925,000 and 7,954,6984,466,970 of our common shares, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:    The components of AOCI, net of tax, were as follows at May 31:

(in thousands)  2012   2011 

Foreign currency translation

  $(1,355  $13,448  

Defined benefit pension liability

   (12,494   (3,253

Cash flow hedges

   (6,538   (6,220
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  $(20,387  $3,975  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

A net loss of $1,245,000 (net of tax of $794,000), $2,431,000 (net of tax of $1,487,000) and $2,219,000 (net of tax of $1,222,000) were reclassified from AOCI for cash flow hedges in fiscal 2012, fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively.

The estimated net amount of the existing losses in AOCI at May 31, 2012 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months was $1,135,000 (net of tax of $724,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2012, and will change before actual reclassification from AOCI to net earnings during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2013.

Note IJ – Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

Under our employee and non-employee director stock-based compensation plans, we may grant incentive or non-qualified stock options, restricted common shares and performance shares to employees and non-qualified stock options and restricted common shares to non-employee directors. We classify share-based compensation expense within SG&A expense to correspond with the same financial statement caption as the majority of the cash compensation paid to employees. A total of 23,249,0006,838,710 of our common shares have been authorized and are available for issuance in connection with the stock-based compensation plans in place at May 31, 2012.2013.

We recognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for stock options and restricted share awards of $13,270,000 ($8,339,000 after-tax), $11,742,000 ($7,871,000 after-tax), and $6,173,000 ($4,163,000 after-tax) and $4,570,000 ($2,826,000 after-tax) during fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. At May 31, 2012,2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards was $21,044,000,$16,962,000, which will be expensed over the next fourthree fiscal years.

Stock options may be granted to purchase common shares at not less than 100% of fair market value on the date of the grant. All outstanding stock options are non-qualified stock options. The exercise price of all stock options granted has been set at 100% of the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. Generally, stock options granted to employees vest and become exercisable at the rate of (i) 20% per year for options issued before June 30, 2011, and (ii) 33% per year for options issued on or after June 30, 2011, in each case beginning one year from the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. Non-qualified stock options granted to non-employee directors vest and become exercisable on the earlier of (a) the first anniversary of the date of grant or (b) the date on which the next annual meeting of shareholders is held following the date of grant for any stock option granted as of the date of an annual meeting of shareholders of Worthington Industries, Inc. Stock options can be exercised through net-settlement, at the election of the option holder.

In addition to stock options, we have awarded performance shares to certain key employees that are contingent (i.e., vest) upon achieving corporate targets for cumulative corporate economic value added, earnings per share growth and, in the case of business unit executives, business unit operating income targets for the three-year periods ending May 31, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2014.2015. These performance share awards will be paid, to the extent earned, in common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. in the fiscal quarter following the end of the applicable three-year performance period.

We have also awarded restricted shares to certain employees and non-employee directors. These restricted shares are valued at the closing market price of common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. on the date of the grant. Service-based restricted shares granted to employees cliff vest three years from the date of grant. Service-based restricted shares granted to non-employee directors vest under the same parameters as the stock options discussed above. Vesting of market-based restricted shares is contingent upon our common shares reaching a specific price per share for a specific period of time as discussed more fully below,below.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

U.S. GAAP requires that all share-based awards, including grants of stock options, be recorded as expense in the statement of earnings based on their grant-date fair value. We calculate the fair value of our non-qualified stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and certain assumptions. The computation of fair values for all stock options incorporates the following assumptions: expected volatility (based on the historical volatility of our common shares); risk-free interest rate (based on the United States Treasury strip rate for the expected term of the stock options); expected term (based on historical exercise experience); and dividend yield (based on annualized current dividends and an average quoted price of our common shares over the preceding annual period).

The table below sets forth the non-qualified stock options granted during each of the last three fiscal years ended May 31.years. For each grant, the exercise price was equal to the closing market price of the underlying common shares at each respective grant date. The fair values of these stock options were based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, calculated at the respective grant dates. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these stock options, which is after an estimate of forfeitures, will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting periods of the stock options.

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Granted

   600     2,437     993     1,034    600    2,437 

Weighted average exercise price, per share

  $21.15    $12.27    $13.36    $20.83   $21.15   $12.27 

Weighted average grant date fair value, per share

  $7.42    $4.88    $4.85    $6.93   $7.42   $4.88 

Pre-tax stock-based compensation

  $4,456    $9,715    $3,968    $7,165   $4,456   $9,715 

The weighted average fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

  2012 2011 2010   2013 2012 2011 

Assumptions used:

        

Dividend yield

   2.70  2.80  3.10   2.95%  2.70%  2.80%

Expected volatility

   51.70  53.80  47.90   52.88%  51.70%  53.80%

Risk-free interest rate

   1.90  2.10  2.90   0.91%  1.90%  2.10%

Expected life (years)

   6.0    6.0    6.0     6.0   6.0   6.0 

The following tables summarize our stock option activity for the years ended May 31:

 

  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 
(in thousands, except per share)  Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Stock
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

Outstanding, beginning of year

   7,852   $16.29     6,172   $17.67     5,750   $18.16     7,511  $16.65    7,852  $16.29    6,172  $17.67 

Granted

   600    21.15     2,437    12.27     993    13.36     1,034   20.83    600   21.15    2,437   12.27 

Exercised

   (675  16.87     (422  12.96     (227  12.75     (2,858)  17.18    (675)  16.87    (422)  12.96 

Expired

   -    -     -    -     -    -     -   -    -   -    -   - 

Forfeited

   (266  15.55     (335  16.00     (344  16.69     (170)  15.86    (266)  15.55    (335)  16.00 
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

Outstanding, end of year

   7,511    16.65     7,852    16.29     6,172    17.67     5,517   17.19    7,511   16.65    7,852   16.29 
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

Exercisable at end of year

   4,404    17.72     3,917    18.24     3,631    17.79     2,682   17.70    4,404   17.72    3,917   18.24 
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  Number of
Stock Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

(in thousands)
 

May 31, 2013

      

Outstanding

   5,517    6.06   $94,860 

Exercisable

   2,682    4.50    44,752 
  Number of
Stock Options

(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(in  thousands)
 

May 31, 2012

            

Outstanding

   7,511     5.53    $11,786     7,511    5.53   $11,786 

Exercisable

   4,404     4.12     3,381     4,404    4.12    3,381 

May 31, 2011

            

Outstanding

   7,852     6.30    $43,876     7,852    6.30   $43,876 

Exercisable

   3,917     4.27     14,312     3,917    4.27    14,312 

May 31, 2010

      

Outstanding

   6,172     5.89    $2,671  

Exercisable

   3,631     4.41     1,268  

During fiscal 2012,2013, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $3,220,000.$21,731,000. The total amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $11,116,000 during fiscal 2012,2013 was $37,914,000, and the related excess tax benefit realized from the exercise of these stock options was $578,000.$5,183,000.

The following table summarizes information about non-vested stock option awards for the year ended May 31, 2012:2013:

 

  Number of
Stock Options

(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per
Share
   Number of
Stock Options
(in thousands)
   Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per
Share
 

Non-vested, beginning of year

   3,935    $5.14     3,107   $5.52 

Granted

   600     7.50     1,034    6.93 

Vested

   (1,160   5.29     (1,136)   5.69 

Forfeited

   (268   5.36     (170)   5.35 
  

 

     

 

   

Non-vested, end of year

   3,107    $5.52     2,835   $5.96 
  

 

     

 

   

Service-Based Restricted Common Shares

The table below sets forth the restricted common shares we granted during each of the last three fiscal years ended May 31. The fair values of these restricted common shares were equal to the closing market prices of the underlying common shares at their respective grant dates. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these restricted common shares will be recognized on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods.

 

  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Granted

   514,974     26,100     21,750     121,400    514,974    26,100 

Weighted average grant date fair value, per share

  $14.57    $15.33    $13.90    $18.94   $14.57   $15.33 

Pre-tax stock-based compensation (in thousands)

  $7,501    $400    $302    $2,299   $7,501   $400 

Market-Based Restricted Common Shares

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we granted 370,000 restricted common shares to certain key employees under our stock-based compensation plans. Vesting of these restricted common share awards is contingent upon the price of our common shares reaching $30.00 per share and remaining at or above that price for 30 consecutive days. The grant-date fair value of these restricted common shares, as determined by a Monte Carlo simulation model, was $19.53 per share. The Monte Carlo simulation model is a statistical technique that incorporates multiple assumptions to determine the probability that the market condition will be achieved. The following assumptions were used to determine the grant-date fair value and the derived service period for these restricted common shares:

 

Dividend yield

   2.3%

Expected volatility

   52.6%

Risk-free interest rate

   1.8%

The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these restricted common shares was determined to be $7,226,000 and the derived service period was determined to be 0.81 years.

On September 14, 2011, the award agreements for these restricted common shares were amended to include a three-year service-based vesting condition in addition to the market-based vesting condition

established in the original agreements. The amended awards were accounted for as a modification of the original awards in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. No incremental compensation

expense was recognized in connection with the modification, as the fair value of the modified awards did not exceed the fair value of the original awards. Accordingly, theThe remaining unrecognized compensation expense of the originalthese awards as of the modification date,at May 31, 2013, or $5,739,000,$2,093,000, will be recorded on a straight-line basis over the modifiedremaining service period, or approximately three years.period. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the market-based condition of these awards was met.

Note JK – Employee Pension Plans

We provide retirement benefits to employees mainly through defined contribution retirement plans. Eligible participants make pre-tax contributions based on elected percentages of eligible compensation, subject to annual addition and other limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and the various plans’ provisions. Company contributions consist of company matching contributions, annual or monthly employer contributions and discretionary contributions, based on individual plan provisions.

We also have one defined benefit plan, The Gerstenslager Company Bargaining Unit Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Gerstenslager Plan” or “defined benefit plan”). The Gerstenslager Plan is anon-contributory pension plan, which covers certain employees based on age and length of service. Our contributions have complied with ERISA’s minimum funding requirements. Effective May 9, 2011, in connection with the formation of the ArtiFlex joint venture, the Gerstenslager Plan was frozen, which qualified as a curtailment under the applicable accounting guidance. We did not recognize a gain or loss in connection with the curtailment of the Gerstenslager Plan. Refer to “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information regarding the formation of ArtiFlex.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit plan and the defined contribution plans for the years ended May 31:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Defined benefit plan:

            

Service cost

  $-    $575    $490    $-   $-   $575 

Interest cost

   1,213     1,140     1,059     1,361    1,213    1,140 

Actual return on plan assets

   (789   3,921     3,152     4,355    (789)   3,921 

Net amortization and deferral

   (756   (4,825   (3,811   (5,522)   (756)   (4,825)
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit) on defined benefit plan

   (332   811     890     194    (332)   811 

Defined contribution plans

   8,643     9,870     8,817     9,955    8,643    9,870 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total retirement plan cost

  $8,311    $10,681    $9,707    $10,149   $8,311   $10,681 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following actuarial assumptions were used for our defined benefit plan:

 

  2012 2011 2010   2013 2012 2011 

To determine benefit obligation:

        

Discount rate

   4.16  5.60  6.00   4.44%  4.16%  5.60%

To determine net periodic pension cost:

        

Discount rate

   5.60  6.00  7.45   4.16%  5.60%  6.00%

Expected long-term rate of return

   8.00  8.00  8.00   8.00%  8.00%  8.00%

Rate of compensation increase

   n/a    n/a    n/a     n/a   n/a   n/a 

To calculate the discount rate, we used the expected cash flows of the benefit payments and the Citigroup Pension Index. The Gerstenslager Plan’s expected long-term rate of return in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was based on the actual historical returns adjusted for a change in the frequency of lump-sum

settlements upon retirement. In determining our benefit obligation, we use the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which each eligible employee is currently entitled, based on the employee’s expected date of separation or retirement.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets and the funded status for the Gerstenslager Plan during fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 20112012 as of the respective measurement dates:

 

(in thousands)  May 31,
2012
   May 31,
2011
   May 31,
2013
   May 31,
2012
 

Change in benefit obligation

        

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

  $21,814    $19,451    $33,023   $21,814 

Service cost

   -     575     -     -  

Interest cost

   1,213     1,140     1,361    1,213 

Actuarial loss

   10,496     1,061  

Actuarial loss (gain)

   (1,810)   10,496 

Benefits paid

   (500   (413   (644)   (500)
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Benefit obligation, end of year

  $33,023    $21,814    $31,930   $33,023 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Change in plan assets

        

Fair value, beginning of year

  $19,808    $14,993    $19,746   $19,808 

Actual return on plan assets

   (789   3,921     4,355    (789)

Company contributions

   1,227     1,307     985    1,227 

Benefits paid

   (500   (413   (644)   (500)
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fair value, end of year

  $19,746    $19,808    $24,442   $19,746 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Funded status

  $(13,277  $(2,006  $(7,488)  $(13,277)
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

        

Other liabilities

  $(13,277  $(2,006  $(7,488)  $(13,277)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   16,897     4,067     11,899    16,897 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

        

Net loss

   16,897     4,067     11,899    16,897 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $16,897    $4,067    $11,899   $16,897 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table shows other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI during the fiscal year ended May 31:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Net actuarial gain (loss)

  $(12,899  $1,606    $4,559   $(12,899)

Amortization of prior service cost

   70     350     439    70 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total recognized in other comprehensive income

  $(12,829  $1,956    $4,998   $(12,829)
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income

  $(12,497  $1,145    $4,804   $(12,497
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The estimated net loss and prior service costgain for the defined benefit plan that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost over the fiscal year ending May 31, 2013 are $439,000 and $0, respectively.2014 is $290,000.

Pension plan assets are required to be disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value is defined in “Note PQ – Fair Value Measurements.” The pension plan assets’ fair value measurement level

within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, a summary of the defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2013:

(in thousands)  Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in  Active

Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Investment:

        

Money Market Funds

  $939   $939   $  -    $  -  

Bond Funds

   6,274    6,274    -     -  

Equity Funds

   17,229    17,229    -     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $24,442   $24,442   $-    $-  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy a summary of the defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2012:

 

(in thousands)  Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Investment:

        

Money Market Funds

  $74    $74    $  -    $  -  

Bond Funds

   6,350     6,350     -     -  

Equity Funds

   13,322     13,322     -     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $19,746    $19,746    $-    $-  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy a summary of the defined benefit plan’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2011:

(in thousands)  Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Fair Value   Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Investment:

                

Money Market Funds

  $349    $349    $  -    $  -    $74   $74   $  -    $  -  

Bond Funds

   5,579     5,579     -     -     6,350    6,350    -     -  

Equity Funds

   13,880     13,880     -     -     13,322    13,322    -     -  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Totals

  $19,808    $19,808    $-    $-    $19,746   $19,746   $-    $-  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fair values of the money market, bond and equity funds held by the defined benefit plan were determined by quoted market prices.

Plan assets for the defined benefit plan consisted principally of the following as of the respective measurement dates:

 

  May 31,
2012
 May 31,
2011
   May 31,
2013
 May 31,
2012
 

Asset category

      

Equity securities

   68  70   70  68

Debt securities

   32  28   26  32

Other

   0  2   4  0
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   100  100   100  100
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Equity securities include no employer stock. The investment policy and strategy for the defined benefit plan is: (i) long-term in nature with liquidity requirements that are anticipated to be minimal due to the projected normal retirement date of the average employee and the current average age of participants; (ii) to earn nominal returns, net of investment fees, equal to or in excess of the actuarial assumptions of the plan; and (iii) to include a strategic asset allocation of 60-80% equities, including international, and 20-40% fixed income investments. Employer contributions of $1,259,000$300,000 are expected to be made to the defined benefit plan during fiscal 2013.2014.

The following estimated future benefits, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid during the fiscal years noted:

 

(in thousands)        

2013

  $597  

2014

   635    $658 

2015

   695     708 

2016

   754     758 

2017

   852     849 

2018-2021

   6,278  

2018

   1,003 

2019-2023

   6,745 

Commercial law requires us to pay severance and service benefits to employees at our Austrian Pressure Cylinders location. Severance benefits must be paid to all employees hired before December 31, 2002. Employees hired after that date are covered under a governmental plan that requires us to pay benefits as a percentage of compensation (included in payroll tax withholdings). Service benefits are based on a percentage of compensation and years of service. The accrued liability for these unfunded plans was $5,636,000$6,074,000 and $6,667,000$5,636,000 at May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively, and was included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Net periodic pension cost for these plans was $689,000, $623,000, $506,000 and $728,000$506,000 for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. The assumed salary rate increase was 3.0%, for fiscal 2012,2013, fiscal 20112012 and fiscal 2010.2011. The discount rate at May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010 was2011was 4.50%, 5.50%4.50%, and 5.00%,5.50% respectively. Each discount rate was based on a published corporate bond rate with a term approximating the estimated benefit payment cash flows and is consistent with European and Austrian regulations.

Note KL – Income Taxes

Earnings before income taxes for the years ended May 31 include the following components:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

United States based operations

  $162,285    $166,137    $73,122    $190,942    $162,285    $166,137  

Non – United States based operations

   14,972     16,393     5,035     10,358     14,972     16,393  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

  ��177,257     182,530     78,157     201,300     177,257     182,530  

Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests*

   9,758    8,968     6,266  

Less: Net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests*

   393    9,758    8,968  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Earnings before income taxes attributable to controlling interest

  $167,499    $173,562    $71,891    $200,907    $167,499    $173,562  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

*

Net earnings attributable to noncontrollingnon-controlling interest are not taxable to Worthington.

Significant components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended May 31 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

Current

            

Federal

  $47,543    $47,698    $30,080    $54,427    $47,543    $47,698  

State and local

   2,756     1,246     1,333     4,109     2,756     1,246  

Foreign

   830     2,070     1,347     4,131     830     2,070  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   51,129    51,014     32,760     62,667    51,129    51,014  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred

            

Federal

   67     3,950     (6,804   4,698     67     3,950  

State and local

   (69   3,599     1,399     (2,170   (69   3,599  

Foreign

   777     (67   (705   (730   777     (67
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   775     7,482     (6,110   1,798     775     7,482  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $51,904    $58,496    $26,650    $64,465    $51,904    $58,496  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were credited to additional paid-in capital were $4,054,000, $32,000, $835,000, and $6,000$835,000 for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. Tax benefits (expenses) related to defined benefit pension liability that were credited to (deducted from) other comprehensive income (loss) [“(“OCI”]) were ($1,415,000) $4,975,000, and ($760,000), and $1,163,000 for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. Tax benefits (expenses) related to cash flow hedges that were credited to (deducted from) OCI were ($763,000), $318,000, $563,000, and $854,000$563,000 for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively.

A reconciliation of the 35% federal statutory tax rate to total tax provision follows:

 

  2012 2011 2010   2013 2012 2011 

Federal statutory rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0   35.0  35.0  35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

   1.7    1.8    (1.5   2.3    1.7    1.8  

Change in state and local valuation allowances

   (0.1  1.0    5.0     (1.3  (0.1  1.0  

Change in income tax accruals for resolution of tax audits

   -    0.2    1.9  

Non-U.S. income taxes at other than 35%

   (2.2  (2.2  (1.6   (1.7  (2.4  (2.5

Change in Non-U.S. valuation allowances

   1.1    0.2    0.3  

Qualified production activities deduction

   (2.8  (1.9  (2.1   (3.0  (2.8  (1.9

Other

   (0.6  (0.2  0.4     (0.3  (0.6  (0.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest

   31.0  33.7  37.1   32.1  31.0  33.7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The above effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest excludes any impact from the inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrollingnon-controlling interests in our consolidated statements of earnings. The effective tax rates upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrollingnon-controlling interests were 29.3%32.0%, 32.0%29.3% and 34.1%32.0% for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. The change in effective income tax rates, upon inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrollingnon-controlling interests, is primarily a result of our Spartan, PSI and WNCL consolidated joint venture.ventures. The earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Spartan and PSI do not generate tax expense to Worthington since the investors in Spartan and PSI are taxed directly based on the earnings attributable to them. The tax expense of WNCL, a foreign corporation, is reported in our consolidated tax expense.

Under applicable accounting guidance, a tax benefit may be recognized from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax benefits recognized in our financial statements from such a position were measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits were $3,705,000, $4,410,000, $5,381,000, and $5,933,000$5,381,000 as of May 31, 2013, 2012 May 31,and 2011, and May 31, 2010, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate attributable to controlling interest was $2,862,000$2,409,000 as of May 31, 2012.2013. Unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken, or expected to be taken in a tax return, and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes. Accrued amounts of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as part of income tax expense within our consolidated statements of earnings. As of May 31, 2013, 2012 May 31,and 2011, and May 31, 2010, we had accrued liabilities of $1,128,000, $1,219,000 $1,184,000 and $1,232,000,$1,184,000, respectively, for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

A tabular reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits follows:

 

(In thousands)        

Balance at June 1, 2011

  $5,381  

Balance at June 1, 2012

  $4,410  

Increases - tax positions taken in prior years

   961     452  

Decreases – tax positions taken in prior years

   (540

Increases (decreases) – current tax positions

   -  

Decreases - tax positions taken in prior years

   (486

Increases (decreases) - current tax positions

   121  

Settlements

   (683   (322

Lapse of statutes of limitations

   (709   (470
  

 

   

 

 

Balance at May 31, 2012

  $4,410  

Balance at May 31, 2013

  $3,705  
  

 

   

 

 

Approximately $470,000$528,000 of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to be settled in the next twelve months due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in various tax jurisdictions and as a result of expected settlements with various tax jurisdictions. While it is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months, any change is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The following is a summary of the tax years open to examination by major tax jurisdiction:

U.S. Federal – 20082009 and forward

U.S. State and Local – 2005 and forward

Austria – 20062007 and forward

Canada – 20082009 and forward

Earnings before income taxes attributable to foreign sources for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were as noted above. As of May 31, 2012,2013, and based on the tax laws in effect at that time, it remains our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest our undistributed foreign earnings, except for the foreign earnings of our TWB joint venture. Accordingly, no deferred tax liability has been recorded for those foreign earnings, except those that pertain to TWB. UndistributedExcluding TWB, the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries at May 31, 20122013 were approximately $265,000,000.$220,000,000. If such earnings were not permanently reinvested, a deferred tax liability of approximately $20,000,000$24,000,000 would have been required.

The components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of May 31 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Deferred tax assets

        

Accounts receivable

  $1,640    $1,870    $1,602    $1,640  

Inventories

   5,323     5,932     4,840     5,323  

Accrued expenses

   30,403     29,227     36,547     30,403  

Net operating and capital loss carry forwards

   21,664     22,501     20,369     21,664  

Tax credit carry forwards

   1,044     1,265     1,595     1,044  

Stock-based compensation

   10,771     7,187     10,405     10,771  

Derivative contracts

   5,134     3,761     3,047     5,134  

Other

   12     7     7     12  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   75,991     71,750     78,412     75,991  

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

   (22,025   (22,292   (21,863   (22,025
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   53,966     49,458     56,549     53,966  
  

 

   

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

        

Property, plant and equipment

   (60,373   (58,606   (76,079   (60,373

Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (45,159   (43,947   (47,606   (45,159

Other

   (666   (583   (61   (666
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (106,198   (103,136   (123,746   (106,198
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(52,232  $(53,678  $(67,197  $(52,232
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The above amounts are classified in the consolidated balance sheets as of May 31 as follows:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2013   2012 

Current assets:

        

Deferred income taxes

  $20,906    $28,297    $21,928    $20,906  

Other assets:

    

Deferred income taxes

   -     2,006  

Noncurrent assets:

    

Other assets

   276     -  

Current liabilities:

        

Other accrued items

   (39   -     -     (39

Noncurrent liabilities:

        
  

 

   

 

 

Deferred income taxes

   (73,099   (83,981   (89,401   (73,099
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(52,232  $(53,678  $(67,197  $(52,232
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

At May 31, 2012,2013, we had tax benefits for state net operating loss carry forwards of $18,102,000$16,777,000 that expire from fiscal 2014 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2032. At May 31, 2012, we had2033, tax benefits for foreign net operating loss carry forwards of $2,222,000 for income tax purposes$2,270,000 that expire from fiscal 20132014 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2019. At May 31, 2012, we had2018, a tax benefit for a foreign capital loss carry forward of $1,340,000$1,322,000 with no future expiration date. At May 31, 2012, we haddate, tax benefits for foreign income tax credit carry forwards of $1,032,000$1,266,000 that expire infrom fiscal 2016 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2022.2023, and a tax benefit for foreign investment tax credit carry forwards of $329,000 that expire from fiscal 2014 to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $22,025,000$21,863,000 at May 31, 2012,2013, is associated primarily with the net operating and capital loss carry forwards and foreign tax credit carry forwards. The valuation allowance includes $1,032,000$1,266,000 for federal, $17,230,000$14,605,000 for state and $3,763,000$5,992,000 for foreign. The federal valuation allowance relates to foreign income tax credits. The majority of the state valuation allowance relates to Metal Framing operations in various states and our Decatur, Alabama facility, while theand metal framing operations in various states. The foreign valuation

allowance relates primarily to operations in China, Canada Poland, Luxembourg, India and the Czech Republic.India. Based on our history of profitability and taxable income projections, we have determined that it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets are otherwise realizable.

Note LM — Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended May 31:

 

(in thousands, except per share)  2012   2011   2010 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)  2013   2012   2011 

Numerator (basic & diluted):

            

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest –income available to common shareholders

  $115,595    $115,066    $45,241  

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest – income available to common shareholders

  $136,442   $115,595   $115,066 

Denominator:

            

Denominator for basic earnings per share attributable to controlling interest – weighted average common shares

   69,651     74,803     79,127     69,301    69,651    74,803 

Effect of dilutive securities

   601     606     16     2,013    601    606 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interest – adjusted weighted average common shares

   70,252     75,409     79,143     71,314    70,252    75,409 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Basic earnings per share attributable to controlling interest

  $1.66    $1.54    $0.57    $1.97   $1.66   $1.54 

Diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interest

   1.65     1.53     0.57     1.91    1.65    1.53 

Stock options covering 257,667, 3,451,046, 3,620,287 and 5,820,5143,620,287 common shares for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for those periods because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

Note MN — Segment Data

In connection with the acquisition of Angus, as more fully described in “NOTE N – Acquisitions,” we established a new operating segment, Engineered Cabs, which is considered a separate reportable segment.

Our operations are managed principally on a products and services basis and include fourthree reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Engineered Cabs, and Metal Framing, each of which is comprised of a similar group of products and services. Factors used to identify reportable business segments include the nature of the products and services provided by each business, the management reporting structure, similarity of economic characteristics and certain quantitative measures, as prescribed by authoritative guidance. A discussion of each of our reportable business segments is outlined below.

Steel Processing:    The Steel Processing operating segment consists of the Worthington Steel business unit, and includes Precision Specialty Metals, Inc., a specialty stainless processor located in Los Angeles, California, and Spartan, a consolidated joint venture which operates a cold-rolled hot dipped galvanizing line. Worthington Steel is an intermediate processor of flat-rolled steel and stainless steel. This operating segment’s processing capabilities include pickling; slitting; oscillate slitting; cold reducing; hot-dipped galvanizing; hydrogen annealing; cutting-to-length; temper rolling; tension leveling; edging; non-metallic coating, including dry lubrication, acrylic and paint; and configured blanking. Worthington Steel sells to customers principally in the automotive, construction, lawn and garden, hardware, furniture, office equipment, electrical control, tubing, leisure and recreation, appliance, agricultural, HVAC, container and aerospace markets. Worthington Steel also toll processes steel for steel mills, large end-users, service centers and other processors. Toll processing is different from typical steel processing in that the mill, end-user or other party retains title to the steel and has the responsibility for selling the end product. Toll processing revenues were immaterial for all periods presented.

Pressure Cylinders:    The Pressure Cylinders operating segment consists of the Worthington Cylinders business unit and WNCL, a consolidated joint venture based in India that manufactures high-pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles as well as cylinders for

compressed industrial gases. Our Pressure Cylinders operating segment manufactures and sells filled and unfilled pressure cylinders, tanks and various accessories and related products for a diversified number of end-use market applications. The following is a detailed discussion of these markets:

 

  

Retail:    These products include liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) cylinders for barbecue grills and camping equipment, propane accessories, hand held torches and accessories including fuel cylinders, scuba cylinders, paintball cylinders and Balloon Time® helium balloon kits. These products are sold primarily to mass merchandisers, cylinder exchangers and distributors.

 

Alternative fuels:    TheThis sector includes Type I, II, III and IIIASME cylinders for containment of compressed natural gas and hydrogen for automobiles, buses, and light-duty trucks, as well as propane/autogas cylinders for automobiles.

 

Industrial and Other:    This market sector includes industrial, refrigerant, and certain LPG cylinders, as well as other specialty products. Cylinders in these markets are generally sold to gas producers and distributors. Industrial cylinders hold fuel for uses such as cutting, welding, breathing (medical, diving and firefighting), semiconductor production, and beverage delivery. Refrigerant gas cylinders are used to hold refrigerant gases for commercial, residential and automotive air conditioning and refrigeration systems. LPG cylinders hold fuel for recreational vehicle equipment, residential and light commercial heating systems, industrial forklifts and commercial/residential cooking (the latter, generally outside North America). Specialty products include air reservoirs for truck and truck trailers, which are sold to original equipment manufacturers, and a variety of fire suppression and chemical tanks.

Energy:    This sector includes steel and fiberglass tanks, and pressure vessels and other products for global energy markets, including oil and gas and nuclear, which products are used for a broad variety of exploration, recovery and production purposes; and hoists and other marine products which are used principally in shipyard lift systems. This sector also leverages its manufacturing competencies to produce pressure vessels, atmospheric tanks, controls and various custom machined components for other industrial and agricultural end markets.

Engineered Cabs:    This operating segment designs and manufactures high-quality, custom-engineered open and closed cabs and operator stations for a wide range of heavy mobile equipment in a range of industries. Engineered Cabs also manufactures other specialty weldments, kits, accessories, and cab components. The segment’s core capabilities are organized into two categories: 1) design and engineering and 2) manufacturing. Design and engineering capabilities consist of filling key project management roles from the initial design phase, prototyping and through final manufacturing and delivery of the finished product. Manufacturing capabilities are facilitated by computer-aided design and manufacturing systems as well as a variety of technologically advanced cutting, bending, forming, welding and painting equipment. Products and services are sold principally to original equipment manufacturers located primarily in the United States.

Metal Framing:    The Metal Framing operating segment consists of the Dietrich Metal Framing business unit. As more fully described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” on March 1, 2011, we contributed certain assets of Dietrich to ClarkDietrich, an unconsolidated joint venture. We retained seven of the 13 metal framing facilities, which continued to operate in support of the joint venture. , The financial results and operating performance of the retained facilities have been reported within the Metal Framing operating segment through August 31, 2011, the date by which all of the retained facilities had ceased operations and actions to locate buyers had been initiated. The contributed net assets, which were deconsolidated effective March 1, 2011, have been reported within Metal Framing on a historical basis.

Other:    Included in the Other category are operating segments that do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria and materiality tests for purposes of separate disclosure as reportable business segments, as well as other corporate-related entities. Through May 9, 2011, theseThese operating segments included Automotive Body Panels,are: Steel Packaging, Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations (“WEI”). During the Global Group. On May 9, 2011, in connection withfirst quarter of fiscal 2013, we made certain organizational changes impacting the contributioninternal reporting and management structure of our automotive body panels subsidiary, Gerstenslager,former Global Group operating segment. As a result of these organizational changes, management responsibilities and internal reporting were re-aligned to form the newly-formed joint venture, ArtiFlex,Construction Services and resulting deconsolidation of the contributed net assets,WEI operating segments. Additionally, we no longer maintainmanage our residual metal framing assets in a separate Automotive Body Panelsmanner that constitutes an operating segment. Accordingly, subsequent to May 9, 2011, the operating segments comprising the Other category consist of Steel Packaging and the Global Group. Each of these operating segments is explained in more detail below. We will continue to report the historical financial results and operating performance of our former Automotive Body PanelsMetal Framing operating segment, on a historicalincluding activity related to the wind-down of this business, are reported within the

basis through May 9, 2011. This former operating segment has historically been reported in the “Other”Other category for segment reporting purposes, as itpurposes. Segment information reported in previous periods has not met the applicable aggregation criteria or materiality thresholds for separate disclosure. Accordingly,been restated to conform to this organizational change did not impact the composition of our reportable segments.new presentation.

Steel Packaging:    This operating segment consists of Worthington Steelpac Systems, LLC (“Steelpac”), which designs and manufactures reusable custom platforms, racks and pallets made of steel for supporting, protecting and handling products throughout the shipping process for customers in industries such as automotive, lawn and garden and recreational vehicles.

Construction Services:    This operating segment operates a business platform that includes the design, supply and building/construction of mid-rise light gauge steel framed commercial structures, single family and multi-family housing units. The operating segment includes the Worthington Construction Group and the Military Construction business units. Worthington Construction Group includes high density mid-rise residential construction in emerging and developed international markets. Military Construction operates with a focus on domestic military bases.

Global Group:Worthington Energy Innovations:    This operating segment consists of our Mid-Rise Construction business unit, which designs, supplies and builds mid-rise light-gauge steel framed commercial structures and multi-family housing units; our Military Construction business unit, which75%-owned consolidated joint venture. WEI is involved in the supply and construction of metal framing products for, and in the framing of, single family housing, with a focus on military housing; and our Commercial Stairs business unit, which will cease operations in fiscal 2013. Also included within the Global Group are the recently-formed Global Development Group and Worthington Energy Group business units. The Worthington Energy Group business unit includes the recently-acquired operations of PSI Energy Solutions, LLC (“PSI”), aprofessional services firmcompany that develops cost-effective energy solutions for public and private entities throughoutin North America. The purpose ofWEI designs solutions to minimize energy consumption, manages the Global Group isenergy solution installation, monitors and verifies energy usage, guarantees future energy savings and shares in these savings. Additionally, WEI utilizes certain patented products to provide new organic growth platforms by applying our core competencies in markets that have high growth opportunities.further enhance energy savings.

The accounting policies of the reportable business segments and other operating segments are described in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” We evaluate operating segment performance based on operating income (loss). Inter-segment sales are not material.

The following table presents summarized financial information for our reportable business segments as of, and for the fiscal years ended, May 31:

 

(in thousands) 2012 2011 2010   2013   2012   2011 

Net sales

         

Steel Processing

 $1,578,509   $1,405,492   $988,950    $1,443,499   $1,578,509   $1,405,492 

Pressure Cylinders

  770,101    591,945    467,572     859,264    770,101    591,945 

Engineered Cabs

  104,272    -    -     226,002    104,272    -  

Metal Framing

  4,402    249,543    330,578  

Other

  77,417    195,644    155,934     83,479    81,819    445,187 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

 $2,534,701   $2,442,624   $1,943,034    $2,612,244   $2,534,701   $2,442,624 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Operating income (loss)

         

Steel Processing

 $71,578   $77,671   $51,353    $66,116   $71,578   $77,671 

Pressure Cylinders

  45,108    48,954    30,056     66,367    45,108    48,954 

Engineered Cabs

  4,878    -    -     4,158    4,878    -  

Metal Framing

  (3,913  (7,530  (10,186

Other

  (16,041  5,261    (49,260   (7,499)   (19,954)   (2,269)
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total operating income

 $101,610   $124,356   $21,963    $129,142   $101,610   $124,356 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

         

Steel Processing

 $26,843   $27,632   $26,290    $25,742   $26,843   $27,632 

Pressure Cylinders

  20,407    14,734    12,936     26,919    20,407    14,734 

Engineered Cabs

  3,540    -    -     9,096    3,540    -  

Metal Framing

  765    9,623    14,591  

Other

  4,318    9,069    10,836     4,712    5,083    18,692 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization

 $55,873   $61,058   $64,653    $66,469   $55,873   $61,058 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Pre-tax restructuring and other expense (income)

   

Restructuring and other expense (income)

      

Steel Processing

 $-   $(303 $(488  $-    $-    $(303)

Pressure Cylinders

  52    -    309     2,665    52    -  

Engineered Cabs

  -    -    -     -     -     -  

Metal Framing

  -    1,387    3,892  

Other

  5,932    1,569    530     628    5,932    2,956 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total pre-tax restructuring and other expense

 $5,984   $2,653   $4,243  

Total restructuring and other expense

  $3,293   $5,984   $2,653 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Pre-tax impairment of long-lived assets

   

Impairment of long-lived assets

      

Steel Processing

 $-   $-   $-    $-    $-    $-  

Pressure Cylinders

  -    -    -     6,488    -     -  

Engineered Cabs

  -    -    -     -     -     -  

Metal Framing

  -    -    -  

Other

  355    4,386    35,409     -     355    4,386 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total pre-tax impairment of long-lived assets

 $355   $4,386   $35,409  

Total impairment of long-lived assets

  $6,488   $355   $4,386 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Joint venture transactions

         

Steel Processing

 $(2,102 $-   $-    $-    $(2,102)  $-  

Pressure Cylinders

  -    -    -     -     -     -  

Engineered Cabs

  -    -    -     -     -     -  

Metal Framing

  1,952    (1,810  -  

Other

  -    (8,626  -     (604)   1,952    (10,436)
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total joint venture transactions

 $(150 $(10,436 $-    $(604)  $(150)  $(10,436)
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

         

Steel Processing

 $703,336   $742,838   $674,953    $605,963   $703,336   $742,838 

Pressure Cylinders

  575,250    481,361    393,639     742,686    575,250    481,361 

Engineered Cabs

  199,594    -    -     201,048    199,594    -  

Metal Framing

  7,688    37,069    203,072  

Other

  391,929    405,981    248,683     401,160    399,617    443,050 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

 $1,877,797   $1,667,249   $1,520,347    $1,950,857   $1,877,797   $1,667,249 
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table presents net sales by geographic region for the years ended May 31:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

United States

  $2,333,575    $2,256,579    $1,832,286    $2,418,307   $2,333,575   $2,256,579 

Canada

   29,097     32,891     39,751     21,257    29,097    32,891 

Europe

   150,458     116,071     70,997     159,562    150,458    116,071 

Other

   21,571     37,083     -     13,118    21,571    37,083 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,534,701    $2,442,624    $1,943,034    $2,612,244   $2,534,701   $2,442,624 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table presents property, plant and equipment, net, by geographic region as of May 31:

 

(in thousands)  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012 

United States

  $371,269    $337,894    $459,174    $400,032   $371,269 

Canada

   1,270     1,368     1,055     1,275    1,270 

Europe

   59,209     49,627     45,934     51,222    59,209 

Other

   11,329     16,445     -     6,901    11,329 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $443,077    $405,334    $506,163    $459,430   $443,077  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note NO — Acquisitions

Fiscal 2013

Palmer Mfg. & Tank, Inc.

On April 9, 2013, we acquired the net assets of Palmer Mfg. & Tank, Inc. (“Palmer”) for cash consideration of approximately $113,479,000. Palmer manufactures steel and fiberglass tanks and processing equipment for the oil and gas industry, and custom manufactured fiberglass tanks for agricultural, chemical and general industrial applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of Palmer, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful
Life

(Years)
 
Category    

Customer relationships

  $25,730     8  

Trade name

   8,406     5  

Non-compete agreement

   5,208     5  

Other

   150     3  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $39,494    
  

 

 

   

The purchase price includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The purchase price also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on this group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for Palmer and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $364 

Accounts receivable

   9,252 

Inventories

   17,758 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   9 

Intangible assets

   39,494 

Property, plant and equipment

   16,504 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   83,381 

Accounts payable

   (2,547)

Accrued liabilities

   (2,175)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   78,659 

Goodwill

   34,820 
  

 

 

 

Total cash consideration

  $113,479 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of Palmer have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 2012, would not be materially different than reported results.

Westerman, Inc.

On September 17, 2012, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Westerman, Inc. (“Westerman”) for cash consideration of approximately $62,749,000 and the assumption of approximately $7,251,000 of debt, which was repaid at closing. Westerman is a leading manufacturer of tanks, pressure vessels and other products for the oil and gas and nuclear markets as well as hoists and other products for marine applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of Westerman, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Customer relationships

  $12,796     10  

Trade name

   2,986     3-4  

Non-compete agreement

   1,050     5  

Other

   1,486     1-3  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $18,318    
  

 

 

   

The purchase price includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The purchase price also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on this group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for Westerman and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $639 

Accounts receivable

   6,355 

Inventories

   15,377 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   836 

Intangible assets

   18,318 

Property, plant and equipment

   23,503 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   65,028 

Accounts payable

   (2,952)

Accrued liabilities

   (2,479)

Other current liabilities

   (765)

Short-term borrowings

   (7,251)

Deferred income taxes

   (11,022)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   40,559 

Goodwill

   22,190 
  

 

 

 

Total cash consideration

  $62,749 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of Westerman have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 2012, would not be materially different than reported results.

Fiscal 2012

PSI Energy Solutions

On March 22, 2012, we acquired a 75% ownership interest in PSI Energy Solutions, LLC (“PSI”) for cash consideration of $7,000,000. PSI is a professional services firm that develops cost-effective energy solutions for public and private entities throughout North America. The acquired net assets became part ofcomprise our Global GroupWEI operating segment upon closing and will beare reported in the “Other” category for segment reporting purposes.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of PSI, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

 

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful
Life

(Years)
   Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 
Category    

Customer relationships

  $1,540     15-20    $1,540     15-20  

Non-compete agreement

   180     3     180     3  

Other

   1,670     10     1,670     10  
  

 

     

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $3,390      $3,390    
  

 

     

 

   

The purchase price includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The purchase price also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on the group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for PSI and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $784 

Inventories

   407 

Intangible assets

   3,390 

Property, plant and equipment

   66 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   4,647 

Accounts payable

   (528)

Accrued liabilities

   (437)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   3,682 

Goodwill

   5,651 
  

 

 

 

Net assets

   9,333 

Noncontrolling interest

   (2,333)
  

 

 

 

Total consideration paid

  $7,000 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of PSI have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 20122013 or fiscal 2011,2012, would not be materially different than reported results.

Angus

On December 29, 2011, we acquired 100% of the outstanding economic interests of Angus for cash consideration of approximately $132,940,000 and the assumption of approximately $47,324,000 of debt, of which $44,341,000 was repaid prior to quarter-end. Additionally, we issued 382,749 restricted common shares to certain former employees of Angus who became employees of Worthington upon closing. These restricted common shares, which vest over a period of one or three years, had a grant-date fair value of approximately $6,300,000. Of this amount, approximately $1,100,000 was attributed to the purchase price. The remaining $5,200,000 will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period. Angus designs and manufactures high-quality, custom-engineered open and closed cabs and operator stations for a wide rangeand custom fabrications of heavy mobile equipment. The acquired net assets and related operations of Angus are included incomprise our recently-formedEngineered Cabs operating segment, Engineered Cabs.segment. In connection with the acquisition of Angus, we incurred approximately $780,000 of acquisition-related costs, which have been expensed as incurred and recognized within SG&A expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of Angus, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

 

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Trade name

  $19,100     Indefinite  

Customer relationships

   32,200     10-15  

Non-compete agreement

   640     3  

Other

   963     9  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $52,903    
  

 

 

   

The purchase price includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The purchase price

also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on the group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for Angus and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $2,540    $2,540 

Accounts receivable

   16,515     16,515 

Inventories

   22,865     22,865 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1,281     1,281 

Deferred income taxes

   398     398 

Intangible assets

   52,903     52,903 

Other noncurrent assets

   74     74 

Property, plant and equipment

   57,570     57,570 
  

 

   

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   154,146     154,146 

Accounts payable

   (9,581   (9,581)

Accrued liabilities

   (7,483   (7,483)

Other current liabilities

   (948   (651)

Long-term debt and other short-term borrowings

   (47,324   (47,324)
  

 

   

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   88,810     89,107 

Goodwill

   45,230     44,933 
  

 

   

 

 

Total consideration transferred

  $134,040    $134,040 
  

 

   

 

 

Operating results of Angus have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward, and are disclosed in “Note MN – Segment Operations.”

Pro forma net sales and net earnings of the combined entity had the acquisition occurred on June 1, 2010, are summarized as follows:

 

(unaudited, in thousands)  Net sales   Net earnings   Net sales   Net earnings 

Supplemental pro forma from June 1, 2011—May 31, 2012

  $2,667,478    $138,250    $2,667,478   $138,250 

Supplemental pro forma from June 1, 2010—May 31, 2011

   2,573,251     128,191     2,573,251    128,191 

Supplemental pro forma earnings for fiscal 2012 were adjusted to exclude $508,000 of acquisition-related costs and $2,347,000 of non-recurring expense related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition-date inventory. Supplemental pro forma earnings for fiscal 2011 were adjusted to include these charges.

Coleman Cylinders

On December 1, 2011, we acquired the propane fuel cylinders business of The Coleman Company, Inc. (“Coleman Cylinders”) for cash consideration of approximately $22,653,000. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of the transaction. Subsequent to closing, we received a request from the Federal Trade Commission, asking us to provide, on a voluntary basis, certain information related to the acquisition and the industry as it conducts a preliminary investigation into the transaction. The acquisition fell below the threshold for pre-merger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.closing.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets

acquired. In connection with the acquisition of Coleman Cylinders, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

 

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Customer relationships

  $4,400     15  

Non-compete agreement

   160     5  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $4,560    
  

 

 

   

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. The purchase price also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on the group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for Coleman Cylinders and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)    

Inventories

  $6,456 

Intangible assets

   4,560 

Property, plant and equipment

   9,726 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   20,742 

Accounts payable

   (3,719)

Accrued liabilities

   (258)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   16,765 

Goodwill

   5,888 
  

 

 

 

Total consideration paid

  $22,653 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of Coleman Cylinders have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 20122013 or fiscal 2011,2012, would not be materially different than reported results.

STAKO

On September 30, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Poland-based STAKO sp.Z o.o. (“STAKO”) for cash consideration of approximately $41,500,000. STAKO manufactures liquefied natural gas, propane and butane fuel tanks for use in passenger cars, buses and trucks. The acquired business became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction.closing.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of STAKO, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

 

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Trade name

  $1,500     10  

Customer relationships

   2,500     10-15  

Non-compete agreement

   400     3  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $4,400    
  

 

 

   

The purchase price includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. The purchase price also includes a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on the group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for STAKO and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $2,715 

Accounts receivable

   4,175 

Inventories

   6,208 

Other current assets

   75 

Intangible assets

   4,400 

Other noncurrent assets

   60 

Property, plant and equipment

   23,770 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   41,403 

Accounts payable

   (2,813)

Accrued liabilities

   (750)

Other liabilities

   (2,182)

Deferred income taxes

   (2,384)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   33,274 

Goodwill

   8,226 
  

 

 

 

Total consideration paid

  $41,500 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of STAKO have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011, would not be materially different than reported results.

Bernz

On July 1, 2011, we purchased substantially all of the net assets of Bernz (excluding accounts receivable) from Irwin Industrial Tool Company, a subsidiary of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., for cash consideration of approximately $41,000,000. Bernz is a leading manufacturer of hand held torches and accessories. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of the transaction.closing.

As more fully described in “NOTE DE – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments,” in connection with this purchase transaction, both parties agreed to settle their litigation. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for the settlement of a pre-existing relationship between parties to a business combination, we recognized a settlement gain equal to the amount by which our previously recorded reserve exceeded the estimated fair value of the settlement. The components of the settlement gain are summarized in the following table:

 

(in thousands)    

Reserve

  $14,402  

Less: Fair value of settlement

   (10,000
  

 

 

 

Settlement gain

  $4,402  
  

 

 

 

The settlement gain was recognized within SG&A expense in our fiscal 2012 consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with the classification of the reserves previously recognized in connection with this matter. An income approach that incorporated market participant assumptions regarding the estimate of

future cash flows and the possible variations among those cash flows was used to measure fair value. In accordance with the accounting guidance for a business combination, the fair value of the settlement feature was excluded from the fair value of the consideration transferred for purposes of the purchase price allocation.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of Bernz, we identified and valued the following identifiable intangible assets:

 

(in thousands)  Amount   Useful  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Trade name

  $8,481     Indefinite  

Customer relationships

   10,473     9-13  

Non-compete agreements

   2,268     5  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired identifiable intangible assets

  $21,222    
  

 

 

   

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. The purchase price also includes the fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value in addition to a going-concern element that represents our ability to earn a higher rate of return on the group of assets than would be expected on the separate assets as determined during the valuation process. This additional investment value resulted in goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for Bernz and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands)    

Inventories

  $15,313 

Intangible assets

   21,222 

Property, plant and equipment

   7,884 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   44,419 

Accounts payable

   (6,167)

Accrued liabilities

   (868)
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   37,384 

Goodwill

   3,616 
  

 

 

 

Total consideration paid

  $41,000 
  

 

 

 

Operating results of Bernz have been included in our consolidated statements of earnings from the acquisition date, forward. Pro forma results, including the acquired business since the beginning of fiscal 20122013 or fiscal 2011,2012, would not be materially different than reported results.

Fiscal 2011

MISA Metals, Inc.

On March 1, 2011, we acquired, as partial consideration for the contribution of our metal framing business to ClarkDietrich, the net assets of certain MMI steel processing locations (the “MMI acquisition”). The acquired net assets became part of our Steel Processing operating segment upon closing of the transaction. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold the steel processing assets of two of the three acquired facilities.

As discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in accordance with the accounting guidance for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, the consideration received, including the steel processing assets of MMI, was recognized at fair value. Accordingly, the enterprise fair value of the acquired business, or $72,600,000, represents the purchase price for purposes of applying the purchase price allocation prescribed by the applicable accounting guidance. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values. Intangible assets, consisting of customer relationships, are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 15 years.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)    

Accounts receivable

  $24,470  

Inventories

   40,262  

Other current assets

   7,426  

Intangible assets

   300  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   16,319  
  

 

 

 

Total assets

   88,777  

Accounts payable

   (15,062

Accrued liabilities

   (1,115
  

 

 

 

Identifiable net assets

   72,600  

Goodwill

   -  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $72,600  
  

 

 

 

Nitin Cylinders Limited

On December 28, 2010, we acquired a 60% ownership interest in India-based Nitin Cylinders Limited for approximately $21,236,000 in cash to expand our presence in the alternative fuels cylinder market. Upon execution of the purchase agreement, the name of the company was changed to Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“WNCL”), which operates as a consolidated joint venture due to our controlling financial interest. WNCL is a manufacturer of high-pressure, seamless steel cylinders for compressed industrial gases and compressed natural gas storage in motor vehicles. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. In connection with the acquisition of WNCL, we identified and valued the following intangible assets:

(in thousands)  Amount   Average  Life
(Years)
 

Category

    

Trade name

  $850     Indefinite  

Customer relationships

   160     15-20  

Other

   230     1-10  
  

 

 

   

Total acquired intangible assets

  $1,240    
  

 

 

   

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market

participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, as well as the acquisition-date fair value of the noncontrolling interest:

(in thousands)    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1,721  

Accounts receivable

   2,499  

Inventories

   9,916  

Other current assets

   652  

Intangible assets

   1,240  

Property, plant and equipment

   14,450  
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable assets

   30,478  

Accounts payable

   (1,227

Accrued liabilities

   (41

Deferred income taxes

   (992
  

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets

   28,218  

Goodwill

   7,174  
  

 

 

 

Net assets

   35,392  

Noncontrolling interest

   (14,156
  

 

 

 

Total consideration paid

  $21,236  
  

 

 

 

Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc.

On June 21, 2010, we acquired the assets of Hy-Mark Cylinders, Inc. (“Hy-Mark”) for cash of $12,175,000. Hy-Mark manufactured extruded aluminum cylinders for medical oxygen, scuba, beverage service, industrial, specialty, and professional racing applications. The acquired net assets became part of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment upon closing of this transaction. The assets of Hy-Mark were relocated to our pressure cylinders facility located in Mississippi subsequent to the acquisition date.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured and recognized based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, with goodwill representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. Intangible assets, consisting mostly of customer lists, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of nine years.

Cash flows used to determine the purchase price included strategic and synergistic benefits (investment value) specific to us, which resulted in a purchase price in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets. Since the fair values assigned to the acquired assets could only assume strategies and synergies of market participants, that additional investment value specific to us was included in goodwill. The purchase price included fair values of other assets that were not identifiable, not separately recognizable under accounting rules (e.g., assembled workforce) or of immaterial value. Goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

(in thousands)    

Inventories

  $3,053  

Intangible assets

   2,660  

Property, plant and equipment

   2,100  
  

 

 

 

Identifiable net assets

   7,813  

Goodwill

   4,362  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $12,175  
  

 

 

 

Note O –P — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to certain risks related to our ongoing operations. The primary risks managed through the use of derivative instruments include interest rate risk, currency exchange risk and commodity price risk. While certain of our derivative instruments are designated

as hedging instruments, we also enter into derivative instruments that are designed to hedge a risk, but are not designated as hedging instruments and therefore do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are adjusted to current fair value through earnings at the end of each period.

Interest Rate Risk Management – We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on cash flows and the market value of our borrowings. We utilize a mix of debt maturities along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt to manage changes in interest rates. In addition, we enter into interest rate swaps to further manage our exposure to interest rate variations related to our borrowings and to lower our overall borrowing costs.

Currency Exchange Risk Management – We conduct business in several major international currencies and are therefore subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. We enter into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to manage this exposure. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. The translation of foreign currencies into United States dollars also subjects us to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates; however, derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk.

Commodity Price Risk Management – We are exposed to changes in the price of certain commodities, including steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials, and our utility requirements. Our objective is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with forecasted purchases and sales of these commodities to allow management to focus its attention on business operations. Accordingly, we enter into derivative contracts to manage the associated price risk.

We are exposed to counterparty credit risk on all of our derivative instruments. Accordingly, we have established and maintain strict counterparty credit guidelines and enter into derivative instruments only with major financial institutions. We do not have significant exposure to any one counterparty and management believes the risk of loss is remote and, in any event, would not be material.

Refer to “Note PQ – Fair Value Measurements” for additional information regarding the accounting treatment for our derivative instruments, as well as how fair value is determined.

The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and the respective line in which they were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2013:

   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet 
Location
   Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet 
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   Receivables   $-   Accounts payable  $4,032 
   Other assets    -    Other liabilities   3,863 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     -       7,895 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Commodity contracts

   Receivables    425   Accounts payable   1,352 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     425      1,352 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $425     $9,247 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

   Receivables   $ 331   Accounts payable  $527 
     331      527 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

   Receivables    5   Accounts payable   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     5      -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $336     $527 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total Derivative Instruments

    $761     $9,774 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and the respective line in which they were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2012:

 

   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-    Accounts payable  $1,859  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   8,825  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     -       10,684  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Commodity contracts

  Receivables   -    Accounts payable   249  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     -       249  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $-      $10,933  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

  Receivables  $245    Accounts payable  $4,060  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     245       4,060  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   912    Accounts payable   -  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     912       -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $1,157      $4,060  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total Derivative Instruments

    $1,157      $14,993  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and the respective line in which they were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2011:

   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands)  Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-    Accounts payable  $2,024  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   10,375  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     -       12,399  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Commodity contracts

  Receivables   194    Accounts payable   -  
  Other assets   -    Other liabilities   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     194       -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $194      $12,399  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

        

Commodity contracts

  Receivables  $944    Accounts payable  $-  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     944       -  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   -    Accounts payable   -  
  Other assets   -    Other accrued items   573  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
     -       573  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Totals

    $944      $573  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total Derivative Instruments

    $1,138      $12,972  
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

  Asset Derivatives  Liability Derivatives 
(in thousands) Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
  Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

    

Interest rate contracts

  Receivables  $-  Accounts payable $1,859 
  Other assets   -   Other liabilities  8,825 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   -     10,684 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity contracts

  Receivables   -   Accounts payable  249 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   -     249 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $-   $10,933 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

    

Commodity contracts

  Receivables  $245  Accounts payable $4,060 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   245    4,060 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

  Receivables   912  Accounts payable  -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   912    -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $1,157   $4,060 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Derivative Instruments

  $1,157   $14,993 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedges

We enter into derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and commodity price fluctuations associated with certain forecasted transactions. These derivative instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same line associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings immediately.

The following table summarizes our cash flow hedges outstanding at May 31, 2012:2013:

 

(Dollars in thousands)  Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date   Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date 

Commodity contracts

  $7,200     November 2012    $20,160    June 2013—May 2014 

Interest rate contracts

   100,000     December 2014     100,000    December 2014 

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in OCI and the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings for derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges during the fiscal years ended May 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

(in thousands)  Income
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Income (Loss)
Reclassified From
Accumulated OCI
(Effective
Portion)
  Income
(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Income (Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing
  Income
(Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded
from
Effectiveness
Testing
   Income
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Income (Loss)
Reclassified From
Accumulated  OCI
(Effective
Portion)
   Income
(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI
(Effective
Portion)
 Location of
Income (Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing
  Income
(Loss)
(Ineffective
Portion)
Excluded
from
Effectiveness
Testing
 

For the fiscal year ended

        

May 31, 2013:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(951)  Interest expense   $(4,011) Interest expense  $
 
        -
 
 
 

Commodity contracts

   (19)  Cost of goods sold    1,580  Cost of goods sold   -  
  

 

    

 

    

 

 

Totals

  $(970)   $(2,431)   $- 
  

 

    

 

    

 

 

For the fiscal year ended

                

May 31, 2012:

                

Interest rate contracts

  $(2,398 Interest expense  $(4,032 Interest expense  $        -    $(2,398)  Interest expense   $(4,032) Interest expense  $- 

Commodity contracts

   (213 Cost of goods sold   1,993   Cost of goods sold   -     (213)  Cost of goods sold    1,993  Cost of goods sold   -  
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

    

 

    

 

 

Totals

  $(2,611   $(2,039   $-    $(2,611)   $(2,039)   $- 
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

    

 

    

 

 

For the fiscal year ended

        

May 31, 2011:

        

Interest rate contracts

  $(5,724 Interest expense  $(4,043 Interest expense  $-  

Commodity contracts

   1,401   Cost of goods sold   125   Cost of goods sold   -  
  

 

    

 

    

 

 

Totals

  $(4,323   $(3,918   $-  
  

 

    

 

    

 

 

The estimated net amount of the losses in AOCI at May 31, 20122013 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months is $1,135,000$2,660,000 (net of tax of $724,000)$1,372,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at May 31, 2012,2013, and will change before actual reclassification from other comprehensive income to net earnings during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013.2014.

Economic (Non-designated) Hedges

We enter into foreign currency contracts to manage our foreign exchange exposure related to inter-company and financing transactions that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment. We also enter into certain commodity contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, these derivative instruments are adjusted to current market value at the end of each period through earnings.

The following table summarizes our economic (non-designated) derivative instruments outstanding at May 31, 2012:2013:

 

(Dollars in thousands)  Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date(s)   Notional
Amount
   Maturity Date(s) 

Commodity contracts

  $25,750     June 2012 -November 2013    $22,340    June 2013—November 2014 

Foreign currency contracts

   71,750     June 2012 - August 2012     415    July 2013 

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in earnings for economic (non-designated) derivative financial instruments during the fiscal years ended May 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

     Income (Loss)  Recognized
in Earnings
  Income (Loss) Recognized
in Earnings
 
(in thousands)  Location of Income (Loss)
Recognized in Earnings
  Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
 
 

Location of Income (Loss)

Recognized in Earnings

 Fiscal Year Ended
May 31,
 
(in thousands) Location of Income (Loss)
Recognized in Earnings
      2012         2011          2013         2012     
  $(7,873 $488   Cost of goods sold $8,039  $(7,873)

Foreign exchange contracts

  Miscellaneous income (expense)   9,855    (7,497 Miscellaneous income (expense)  536   9,855 
    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

    $1,982   $(7,009  $8,575  $1,982 
    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The gain (loss) on the foreign currency derivatives significantly offsets the gain (loss) on the hedged item.

Note PQ – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is an exit price concept that assumes an orderly transaction between willing market participants and is required to be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. Current accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as a basis for considering such assumptions and for classifying the inputs used in the valuation methodologies. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair values are as follows:

 

Level 1

       Observable prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2

       Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3

       Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At May 31, 2013, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in thousands)   Quoted Prices
in
Active
Markets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Derivative contracts

  $  -   $761   $  -   $761 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $-   $761   $-   $761 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

        

Derivative contracts

  $-   $9,774   $-   $9,774 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $-   $9,774   $-   $9,774 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At May 31, 2012, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

 

(in thousands)  Quoted  Prices
in

Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Derivative contracts

  $  -    $1,157    $  -    $1,157  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $-    $1,157    $-    $1,157  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

        

Derivative contracts

  $-    $14,993    $-    $14,993  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $-    $14,993    $-    $14,993  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At May 31, 2011, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in thousands)  Quoted  Prices
in

Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals   Quoted Prices
in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

                

Derivative contracts

  $-    $1,138    $-    $1,138    $-    $1,157   $-    $1,157 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $-    $1,138    $-    $1,138    $-    $1,157   $-    $1,157 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities

                

Derivative contracts

  $-    $12,972    $-    $12,972    $-    $14,993   $-    $14,993 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

  $-    $12,972    $-    $12,972    $-    $14,993   $-    $14,993 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The fair value of our derivative contracts is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows considering the risks involved, including non-performance risk, using discount rates appropriate for the respective maturities. Market observable, Level 2 inputs are used to determine the present value of the expected future cash flows. Refer to “Note OP – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding our use of derivative instruments.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At May 31, 2013, our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:

(in thousands)  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Long-lived assets held and used (1)

  $-    $6,856   $-    $6,856 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $-    $6,856   $-    $6,856 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the long-lived assets of our 60%-owned consolidated joint venture in India, WNCL, were written down to their fair value of $6,856,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $4,968,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. The portion of this impairment loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest, or $1,987,000, is recorded within net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

At May 31, 2012, our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:

 

(in thousands)  Quoted  Prices
in

Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals   Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

                

Long-lived assets held and used (1)

  $-    $225    $-    $225    $-   $225   $-    $225 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $-    $225    $-    $225    $-    $225   $-    $225 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Global GroupConstruction Services operating segment we determined indicators of impairment were

present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to itstheir fair value of $225,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $355,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

At May 31, 2011, our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:

(in thousands)  Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Totals 

Assets

        

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates (1)

  $-    $-    $86,654    $86,654  

Long-lived assets held and used (2)

   -     27,408     -     27,408  

Long-lived assets held for sale (3)

   -     9,681     -     9,681  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $-    $37,089    $86,654    $123,743  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

On March 1, 2011, as partial consideration for the net assets contributed to ClarkDietrich, we received a 25% interest in the newly-formed joint venture. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ClarkDietrich was recorded at its acquisition-date fair value of $58,250,000. Additionally, on May 9, 2011, in connection with the contribution of our automotive body panels business to the ArtiFlex joint venture, we obtained a 50% interest in the newly-formed joint venture. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, our interest in ArtiFlex was recorded at its acquisition-date fair value of $28,404,000.

A combination of the income approach and the market approach was applied to measure the fair value of our interests in both ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex. The income approach included the following inputs and assumptions:

An expectation regarding future revenue growth;

A perpetual long-term growth rate; and

A discount rate based on the estimated weighted average cost of capital.

The market approach was based on cash-free market multiples of selected comparable companies, adjusted for differences in size and scale. Each approach resulted in a business enterprise value that was comparable.

(2)

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived within our Metal Framing operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified assets was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s estimate of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $21,125,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,293,000. This impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line in our consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with the formation of ClarkDietrich. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. Certain assets retained subsequently met the criteria for classification as assets held for sale. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the net assets of these

facilities were presented separately as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2011. As the related assets had previously been written down to their fair value of $3,797,000, no additional impairment charges were recognized. The results of these facilities continued to be reported within operating income as they did not qualify for classification as a discontinued operation.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our former Automotive Body Panels operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $9,180,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $6,414,000. This impairment charge was recognized within the joint venture transactions line in our consolidated statement of earnings to correspond with amounts previously recognized in connection with the formation of ArtiFlex. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Commercial Stairs business unit, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $400,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $2,473,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, due largely to changes in the intended use of certain long-lived assets within our Steel Packaging operating segment, we determined indicators of impairment were present. Recoverability of the identified asset group was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long range estimates of market conditions. The sum of these undiscounted future cash flows was less than the net book value of the asset group. The net book value was also determined to be in excess of fair value and, accordingly, the asset group was written down to its fair value of $500,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,913,000. This impairment loss was recorded within impairment of long-lived assets in our consolidated statement of earnings. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

(3) During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we committed to plans to sell certain steel processing assets acquired in connection with the MMI acquisition, thereby meeting the criteria for classification as assets held for sale. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, these assets were presented separately as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2011. As the acquired assets were recorded at their acquisition-date fair value of $5,884,000, no impairment charges were recognized. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets. The results of these facilities continued to be reported within operating income as they did not qualify for classification as a discontinued operation.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the assets of certain of the retained metal framing facilities met the criteria for classification as assets held for sale. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the net assets of these facilities are presented separately as assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2011. As the related assets had previously been written down to their fair value of $3,797,000, no additional impairment charges were recognized. Fair value was determined based on market prices for similar assets.

The non-derivative financial instruments included in the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, income taxes receivable, other assets, deferred income taxes, accounts payable, short-term

borrowings, accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes, other accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, based upon models utilizing market observable inputs and credit risk, was $274,754,000$421,056,000 and $265,239,000$274,754,000 at May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. The carrying amount of long-term debt, including current maturities, was $258,791,000$407,328,000 and $250,254,000$258,791,000 at May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively.

Note Q –R — Operating Leases

We lease certain property and equipment from third parties under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Rent expense under operating leases was $13,831,000, $14,433,000, $15,736,000 and $16,681,000$15,736,000 in fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010, respectively. Future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases having an initial or remaining term in excess of one year at May 31, 2012,2013, were as follows:

 

(in thousands)        

2013

  $9,278  

2014

   5,039    $8,040 

2015

   2,737     5,125 

2016

   2,403     3,791 

2017

   2,406     3,260 

2018

   2,725 

Thereafter

   5,619     6,978 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $27,482    $29,919  
  

 

   

 

 

Note R –S — Related Party Transactions

We purchase from, and sell to, affiliated companies certain raw materials and services at prevailing market prices. Net sales to affiliated companies for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 totaled $19,568,000, $22,006,000 and fiscal 2010 totaled $22,006,000, $14,627,000, and $9,336,000, respectively. Purchases from affiliated companies for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 totaled $4,930,000, $4,313,000 and fiscal 2010 totaled $4,313,000, $5,916,000, and $4,701,000, respectively. Accounts receivable from affiliated companies were $5,024,000$4,466,000 and $23,211,000$5,024,000 at May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. Accounts payable to affiliated companies were $14,212,000$11,777,000 and $16,690,000$14,212,000 at May 31, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

Note ST – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the unaudited quarterly consolidated results of operations for fiscal 20122013 and fiscal 2011:2012:

 

(in thousands, except per share)  Three Months Ended 
Fiscal 2012  August 31   November 30   February 29   May 31 

Net sales

  $602,387    $565,652    $611,255    $755,407  

Gross margin

   71,462     56,606     83,332     121,468  

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

   25,653     11,985     25,880     52,077  

Earnings per share - basic

  $0.36    $0.17    $0.38    $0.76  

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.35     0.17     0.37     0.75  
Fiscal 2011  August 31   November 30   February 28   May 31 

Net sales

  $616,805    $580,687    $569,439    $675,693  

Gross margin

   78,914     69,819     88,254     119,170  

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

   22,354     14,469     26,326     51,917  

Earnings per share - basic

  $0.29    $0.20    $0.35    $0.71  

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.29     0.20     0.35     0.70  

(in thousands, except per share)  Three Months Ended 
Fiscal 2013  August 31   November 30   February 29   May 31 

Net sales

  $666,035   $622,622   $619,527   $704,060 

Gross margin

   93,651    94,856    97,026    111,110 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

   33,962    31,826    37,131    33,523 

Earnings per share - basic

  $0.50   $0.46   $0.53   $0.48 

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.49    0.45    0.52    0.46 
Fiscal 2012  August 31   November 30   February 29   May 31 

Net sales

  $602,387   $565,652   $611,255   $755,407 

Gross margin

   71,462    56,606    83,332    121,468 

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest

   25,653    11,985    25,880    52,077 

Earnings per share - basic

  $0.36   $0.17   $0.38   $0.76 

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.35    0.17    0.37    0.75 

The sum of the quarterly earnings (loss) per share data presented in the table may not equal the annual results due to rounding and the impact of dilutive securities on the annual versus the quarterly earnings per share calculations.

Results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 (ended May 31, 2012) were favorably impacted by higher overall volumes, aided by the impact of acquisitions, offset by a lower spread between average selling prices and material costs and the impact of the Joint Venture Transactions.

Results for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 (ended February 29, 2012) were negatively affected by the impact of lower volumes as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions and an unfavorable product mix in our Pressure Cylinders operating segment. Results were also negatively impacted by an accrual for certain legal expenses as well as increased restructuring charges as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions.

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 (ended November 30, 2011) were negatively affected by the impact of lower volumes as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions and the impact of inventory holding losses within our Steel Processing operating segment. Results were also negatively impacted by an accrual for estimated product returns and other costs associated with the voluntary recall of our MAP-PRO®, propylene and MAAP® cylinders and related hand torch kits.

Results for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 (ended August 31, 2011) were negatively affected by the impact of lower volumes and an increase in restructuring charges as a result of the Joint Venture Transactions. The unfavorable impact of these items was offset by lower SG&A expenses also due to the impact of the Joint Venture Transactions and a one-time gain related to the settlement of the Bernz dispute.

Results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended May 31, 2011) were favorably impacted by higher volumes, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments and an increased spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel. Our results were also favorably impacted by a one-time gain of $10,436,000 related to the formation of the ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex joint ventures as more fully discussed in “Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Results for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended February 28, 2011) were favorably impacted higher volumes across all of our operating segments, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, and an increased spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel.

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended November 30, 2010) were negatively impacted by higher SG&A expenses, the impact of acquisitions, and higher profit sharing and bonus expenses.

Results for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 (ended August 31, 2010) were favorably impacted by higher volumes, most notably in the Steel Processing and Pressure Cylinders operating segments, and an increased spread between average selling prices and the cost of steel. The favorable impact of these items was offset by higher SG&A expenses due to the impact of acquisitions and increased profit sharing and bonus expenses as a result of higher earnings.

Note TU – Subsequent Events

On July 3, 2012, we reached an agreement in principal to issue up to $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in a private placement offering. These notes will mature 12 years fromJune 26, 2013, the issuance date and will bear interest at a rate of 4.60%. We expect to complete this private placement offering during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

On June 27, 2012, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.13$0.15 per share, which represents a $0.01an increase of $0.02 per share increase from the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.previous quarterly rate. The dividend is payable on September 28, 2012,27, 2013 to shareholders of record ason September 13, 2013.

On June 30, 2013, the Company completed the sale of September 14, 2012.Integrated Terminals, its warehouse facility in Detroit, Michigan, for cash proceeds of $7,480,000, resulting in a gain of approximately $4,730,000.

From July 1, 2013, through July 12, 2013, we paid $19,763,000 to repurchase 580,500 of our common shares leaving 4,522,332 common shares available for repurchase under the June 29, 2011 repurchase authorization.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 

COL. A.    COL. B.    COL. C.    COL. D.    COL. E.       COL. B.    COL. C.    COL. D.    COL. E.   
Description         Additions                      Additions             
 

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

 

    Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
    Charged to
Other Accounts –
Describe (B)
    Deductions –
Describe (C)
 Balance at End
of Period
     

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

 

    Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
    Charged to
Other Accounts –
Describe (A)
    Deductions –
Describe (B)
 Balance at End
of Period
   

Year Ended May 31, 2013:

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $3,329,000    $783,000    $26,000    $730,000    $3,408,000   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Year Ended May 31, 2012:

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $4,150,000    $339,000    $ 370,000    $1,530,000    $ 3,329,000     $4,150,000    $339,000    $370,000    $1,530,000    $3,329,000   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Year Ended May 31, 2011:

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $5,752,000    $1,236,000    $106,000    $2,732,000 (D)   $4,150,000     $5,752,000    $1,236,000    $106,000    $2,732,000 (C)   $4,150,000   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Year Ended May 31, 2010:

Deducted from asset accounts:

Allowance for possible losses on trade accounts receivable

  $12,470,000    $(900,000) (A)   $29,000    $5,847,000    $5,752,000   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Note A – Net allowance reversal, adjusted through expense.

Note B – Miscellaneous amounts.

Note CB – Uncollectable accounts charged to the allowance.

Note DC – Includes $686,000 related to the deconsolidation of our metal framing business.

See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Item 9. – Changes inandin and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A.—Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)] that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012)2013). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the last fiscal quarter (the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2012)2013) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Annual Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries, as appropriate; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012,2013, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The scope of the assessment included all of the consolidated operations of the Company except for Angus Industries, Inc. (“Angus”), which was acquired on December 29, 2011. The net sales and total assets of Angus represented 4.1% and 10.6% of consolidated net sales and total assets of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2012, respectively. Management’s assessment included evaluation of such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies and our overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed under the direction of management.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Based on the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level as of May 31, 2012.2013. The results of management’s assessment were reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.

Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, independently assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and issued the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Worthington Industries, Inc.:

We have audited Worthington Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Worthington Industries, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Annual Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Worthington Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Worthington Industries, Inc. acquired Angus Industries, Inc. during 2012, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Worthington Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2012, Angus Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $200 million and net sales of $104 million included in the consolidated financial statements of Worthington Industries, Inc. as of and for the year ended May 31, 2012. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Worthington Industries, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Angus Industries, Inc.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2012,2013, and our report dated July 30, 2012,2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

/S/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

July 30, 20122013

Item 9B. – Other Information

There is nothing to be reported under this Item 9B.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors, Executive Officers and Persons Nominated or Chosen to Become Directors or Executive Officers

The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (“Worthington Industries” or the “Registrant”) and the nominees for re-election as directors of Worthington Industries at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 27, 201226, 2013 (the “2012“2013 Annual Meeting”) is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in Worthington Industries’ definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20122013 Annual Meeting (“Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of Worthington Industries’ fiscal 20122013 (the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012)2013).

The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the executive officers of Worthington Industries is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included under the caption “Supplemental Item – Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Procedures by which Shareholders may Recommend Nominees to Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors

Information concerning the procedures by which shareholders of Worthington Industries may recommend nominees to Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Committees of the Board – Nominating and Governance Committee” and “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Nominating Procedures” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement. These procedures have not materially changed from those described in Worthington Industries’ definitive Proxy Statement for the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 29, 2011.27, 2012.

Audit Committee Matters

The information required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of SEC RegulationS-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS –Committees of the Board – Audit Committee” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Code of Conduct; Committee Charters; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Charter of Lead Independent Director

Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors has adopted Charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee as well as Corporate Governance Guidelines as contemplated by the applicable sections of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors has also adopted a Charter of the Lead Independent Director of Worthington Industries’ Board of Directors.

In accordance with the requirements of Section 303A.10 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries has adopted a Code of Conduct covering the directors, officers and employees of Worthington Industries and its subsidiaries, including Worthington Industries’ Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Worthington Industries’ Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) and Worthington Industries’ Controller (the principal accounting officer). The Registrant will disclose the following events, if they occur, in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within the required four business days following their occurrence: (A) the date and nature of any amendment to a provision of Worthington Industries’ Code of Conduct that (i) applies to Worthington Industries’ principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, (ii) relates to any element of the “code of ethics” definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of SECRegulation S-K, and (iii) is not a technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendment; and (B) a description of any waiver (including the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver), including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Conduct granted to Worthington Industries’ principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, that relates to one or more of the elements of the “code of ethics” definition set forth in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K. In addition, Worthington Industries will disclose any waivers from the provisions of the Code of Conduct granted to a director or executive officer of Worthington Industries in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within the required four business days following their occurrence.

The text of each of the Charter of the Audit Committee, the Charter of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, the Charter of the Executive Committee, the Charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Charter of the Lead Independent Director, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of Conduct is posted on the “Corporate Governance” page of the “Investor Relations” section of Worthington Industries’ web site located at www.worthingtonindustries.com. In addition, a copy of the Code of Conduct as currently in effect is includedwas filed as Exhibit 14 to thisthe 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 11. — Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” and “COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

The information required by Item 407(e)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

The information required by Item 407(e)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Compensation Committee Report” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Ownership of Common Shares of Worthington Industries

The information required by Item 403 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information required by Item 201(d) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The information required by Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure in respect of John P. McConnell to be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” and from the disclosure to be included under the caption “TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN RELATED PERSONS” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Director Independence

The information required by Item 407(a) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Director Independence” in Worthington Industries’ Definitive 20122013 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. — Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the captions “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS – Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS – Pre-Approval of Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

PART IV

Item 15. — Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)

The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

 (1)

Consolidated Financial Statements:

The consolidated financial statements (and report thereon) listed below are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 20122013 and 20112012

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

 

 (2)

Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are omitted because they are not required or the required information has been presented in the aforementioned consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

 (3)

Listing of Exhibits:

The exhibits listed on the “Index to Exhibits” beginning on page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference as noted in the “Index to Exhibits.” The “Index to Exhibits” specifically identifies each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be included as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

 

(b)

Exhibits: The exhibits listed on the “Index to Exhibits” beginning on page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference as noted in the “Index to Exhibits.”

 

(c)

Financial Statement Schedule: The financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) above is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

Date: July 30, 20122013

  By: 

 /S/ JOHN P. MCCONNELLCCONNELL

   

John P. McConnell,

   

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

SIGNATURE

  

DATE

 

TITLE

/s/ John P. McConnell

John P. McConnell

  July 30, 20122013 

Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ B. Andrew Rose

B. Andrew Rose

  July 30, 20122013 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Richard G. Welch

Richard G. Welch

  July 30, 20122013 

Controller

(Principal (Principal Accounting Officer)

*

Kerrii B. Anderson

  * 

Director

*

John B. Blystone

  * 

Director

*

Mark C. Davis

  * 

Director

*

Michael J. Endres

  * 

Director

*

Ozey K. Horton, Jr.

  * 

Director

*

Peter Karmanos, Jr.

  * 

Director

*

Carl A. Nelson, Jr.

  * 

Director

*

Sidney A. Ribeau

  * 

Director

*

Mary Schiavo

  * 

Director

*The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of each of the above-identified directors of the Registrant pursuant to powers of attorney executed by such directors, which powers of attorney are filed with this report within Exhibit 24.

 

*By:

 

/s/ John P. McConnell

    Date: July 30, 20122013
 John P. McConnell    
 Attorney-In-Fact    

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

 

  

Description

 

    

Location

 

    2.1  

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2011, by and between Worthington Steel of Michigan, Inc. and each of (i) Angus Industries, Inc., (ii) Angus Industries, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust, (iii) William Blair Mezzanine Capital Fund III, L.P. and (iv) Robert A. Kluver, not in his individual capacity but solely in his capacity as Phantom Unit Holder Representative?

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Worthington Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Registrant”), dated January 4, 2012 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 001-08399)1-8399)

    3.1  

Amended Articles of Incorporation of Worthington Industries, Inc., as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on October 13, 1998

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the “Registrant’sRegistrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 1998 (SEC File No. 0-4016)

    3.2  

Code of Regulations of Worthington Industries, Inc., as amended through September 28, 2000 [for SEC reporting compliance purposes only]

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2000 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.1  

Credit Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2012, among Worthington Industries, Inc., as Borrower; the Foreign Subsidiary Borrowers from time to time party thereto; the Lenders from time to time party thereto; PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent; Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents; and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Arrangers

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2012 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.2  

Note Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2004, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and Allstate Life Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Principal Life Insurance Company

   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2004 and filed with the SEC on December 21, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.3  Form of Floating Rate Senior Note due December 17, 2014   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2004 and filed with the SEC on December 21, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

 

? 

The Attachments, Exhibits and Disclosure Schedules referenced in the Stock Purchase Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of SEC Regulation S-K. Worthington Industries, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish a copy of the omitted Attachments, Exhibits and Disclosure Schedules upon request by the SEC.

    4.4  First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2006, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and the purchasers named therein regarding the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, and the $100,000,000 Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 17, 2014   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.5  Indenture, dated as of April 13, 2010, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.6  First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 13, 2010, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.7  Form of 6.50% Global Note due April 15, 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.6)4.6 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K)   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.8  Note Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2012, between Worthington Industries, Inc. and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, The Prudential Life Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Gibraltar Life Insurance Co., Ltd.

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2012 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

    4.9Form of 4.60% Senior Note due August 10, 2024 (included in Exhibit 4.8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2012 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  4.10Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements defining rights of holders of long-term debt   

Filed herewith

  10.1  Worthington Industries, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan effective March 1, 2000*2000*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2  Amendment to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Amendment effective as of September 1, 2011)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.3  Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Restatement effective as of December 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4  First Amendment to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (First Amendment effective as of September 1, 2011)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5  Worthington Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as Amended and Restated, effective June 1, 2000*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2000 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.6  Amendment to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as Amended and Restated, effective June 1, 2000 (Amendment effective as of September 1, 2011)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.7  Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Restatement effective as of December 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.8  First Amendment to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (First Amendment effective as of September 1, 2011)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.9  Worthington Industries, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 0-4016)

  10.10Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.1110.10  Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement for non-qualified stock options under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.1210.11  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan entered into and to be entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. prior to June 2013 in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock to employees of Worthington Industries, Inc.**   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.1310.12  Form of Letter Evidencing Cash Performance Awards and Performance Share Awards Granted and to be Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan)* with targets for the three-fiscal-year periods ending on May 31, 2011, on May 31, 2012, on May 31, 2013 and on May 31, 2014*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.1410.13  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by RegistrantWorthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant for 2011 effective as of June 30, 2011, of restricted common shares, and similar form entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant for 2012 effective as of June 29, 2012, of restricted common shares, in each case which will vest in three years from the grant date, pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.14Form of Letter Evidencing Performance Awards Granted and to be Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan with targets for three-fiscal-year periods ending on or after May 31, 2015*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2013 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.15  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Registrant with each of B. Andrew Rose and Mark A. Russell in order to evidence the grant effective as of June 30, 2011 of 185,000 common shares pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan [NOTE: Superseded by Exhibit 10.16]*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.16  Form of Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into effective as of September 14, 2011 by RegistrantWorthington Industries, Inc. with each of B. Andrew Rose and Mark A. Russell in order to amend and restate the original Restricted Stock Award Agreement effective as of June 30, 2011 in respect of 185,000 common shares granted pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan [NOTE: Supersedes Exhibit 10.15]*Plan*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 8-K dated September 20, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.17Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant for 2013, effective as of June 28, 2013, of restricted common shares, which will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2013 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.18Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. with George P. Stoe, in order to evidence the grant, effective as of June 28, 2013, of restricted common shares, which will vest in one year, pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2013 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.19Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Award Agreement entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. with each of B. Andrew Rose and Mark A. Russell in order to evidence the grant, effective as of June 28, 2013, of 180,000 performance-based restricted common shares pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2013 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.20  Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.1810.21  Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors for non-qualified stock options granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors) from and after September 25, 2003*2003 until September 29, 2005*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.1910.22  Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option Plan (amendment and restatement effective November 1, 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangemen.

  10.2010.23  Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement for non-qualified stock options granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option Plan)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2110.24  Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.2210.25  First Amendment to the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (amendment and restatement effective as of November 1, 2008) (First Amendment approved by shareholders on September 29, 2011)*   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2310.26  Form of Non-QualifiedNonqualified Stock Option and Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of non-qualifiednonqualified stock options to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on September 27, 2006 and September 26, 2007*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2006 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2410.27  Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) to evidence the grant of non-qualified stock options to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on and after September 24, 2008*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2510.28  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock on September 27, 2006 and September 26, 2007 to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 2006 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.2610.29  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (now known as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors) entered into by Worthington

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of restricted stock to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. on September 24, 2008 and to be entered into by Worthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence future grants of restricted stock to non-employee directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.**   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2710.30  Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 5, 2010 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2810.31  Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement entered into by RegistrantWorthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence the grant of non-qualified stock options to executive officers of RegistrantWorthington Industries, Inc. effective as of June 30, 2011 pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan and to be entered into by RegistrantWorthington Industries, Inc. in order to evidence future grants of non-qualified stock options to executive officers pursuant to the Worthington Industries, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.2910.32  Worthington Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan for Executives (approved by shareholders on September 24, 2008)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2008 and filed with the SEC on the same date (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3010.33  Form of Letter Evidencing Cash Performance Bonus Awards Granted and to be Granted under the Worthington Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan for Executives (sometimes also referred to as the Worthington Industries, Inc. Annual Short Term Incentive Plan)*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3110.34  Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(i) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.3210.35  Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2001, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(ii) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  10.3310.36  Amendment No. 2 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2004, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, members of various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g)(x) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8399)

  10.3410.37  Amendment No. 3 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2005, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3510.38  Amendment No. 4 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2008, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3610.39  Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2009, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3710.40  Amendment No. 6 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2009, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3810.41  Amendment No. 7 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2010, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.3910.42  Amendment No. 8 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2010, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4010.43  Amendment No. 9 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4110.44  Amendment No. 10 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4210.45  Amendment No. 11 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2011, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4310.46  Amendment No. 12 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2012, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party to the Receivables Purchase Agreement and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 29, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4410.47Amendment No. 13 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2013, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party to the Receivables Purchase Agreement and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.48Amendment No. 14 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2013, among Worthington Receivables Corporation, as Seller, Worthington Industries, Inc., as Servicer, the members of the various purchaser groups from time to time party to the Receivables Purchase Agreement and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrator

Filed herewith

  10.49  Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(iii) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4510.50  Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 18, 2001, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(h)(iv) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001 (File No. 1-8399)

  10.4610.51  Amendment No. 2, dated as of August 25, 2006, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, between the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4710.52  Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 1, 2008, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, Worthington Taylor, Inc. and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4810.53  Amendment No. 4, dated as of February 28, 2011, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, Dietrich Industries, Inc. and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.4910.54  Amendment No. 5, dated as of May 6, 2011, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein, The Gerstenslager Company and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5010.55  Amendment No. 6, dated as of January 19, 2012, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, among the various originators listed therein and Worthington Receivables Corporation   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 29, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5110.56  Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc., effective June 1, 2006 through August 31, 2011*2011*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5210.57  Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc., approved June 29, 2011 and effective September, 2011*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5310.58  Summary of Annual Base Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc.*   

Filed herewith

  10.5410.59  Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards and Stock Options granted in Fiscal 2011 for Named Executive Officers*Officers**   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5510.60  Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Shares granted in Fiscal 2012 for Named Executive Officers*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5610.61  Summary of Annual Cash Performance Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Shares Granted in Fiscal 2013 for Named Executive Officers*

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.62Summary of Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Common Shares granted in Fiscal 20132014 for Named Executive Officers*   

Filed herewith

  10.5710.63  Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Worthington Industries, Inc. and each director of Worthington Industries, Inc.*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  10.5810.64  Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Worthington Industries, Inc. and each executive officer of Worthington Industries, Inc.*   

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

 

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  14  Worthington Industries, Inc. Code of Conduct   

Filed herewithIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 1-8399)

  21  Subsidiaries of Worthington Industries, Inc.   

Filed herewith

  23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)   

Filed herewith

  23.2  Consent of Independent Auditor (KPMG LLP) with respect to consolidated financial statements of Worthington Armstrong Venture   

Filed herewith

  24  Powers of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc.   

Filed herewith

  31.1  Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Executive Officer)   

Filed herewith

  31.2  Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Financial Officer)   

Filed herewith

  32.1  Certifications of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   

Furnished herewith

  32.2  Certifications of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   

Furnished herewith

  99.1  Worthington Armstrong Venture Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010   

Filed herewith

101.INS  XBRL Instance Document   

Submitted electronically herewith #

101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document   

Submitted electronically herewith#

101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document   

Submitted electronically herewith#

101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document   

Submitted electronically herewith#

101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document   

Submitted electronically herewith#

101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document   

Submitted electronically herewith#

 

# Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 20122013 of Worthington Industries, Inc. are the following documents formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):

 

 (i)

Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 20122013 and 2011;2012;

 

 (ii)

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010;2011;

 

 (iii)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011;

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010;2011;

 

 (iv)(v)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010;2011; and

 

 (v)(vi)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related documents in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and otherwise are not subject to liability under these Sections.

 

E-10E-12