UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)

x
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

2015

OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 000-50726

Google Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation
Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code and Telephone Number (Including Area Code)Commission
File Number
IRS Employer
Identification No.
Delaware 77-0493581

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

Alphabet Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
(650) 253-0000
 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

001-37580
61-1767919
Delaware
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
(650) 253-0000
001-3638077-0493581

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(650) 253-0000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Alphabet Inc.:
Class A Common Stock $0.001
$0.001 par value

Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

(Nasdaq Global Select Market)

Class C Capital Stock
$0.001 par value
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(Nasdaq Global Select Market)
Google Inc.:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class

Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par valueAlphabet Inc.:
Options to purchase Class A Common StockNone
Google Inc.:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Alphabet Inc.YesýNo¨
Google Inc.Yes¨Noý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Alphabet Inc.Yes¨Noý
Google Inc.YesýNo¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Alphabet Inc.YesýNo¨
Google Inc.YesýNo¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Alphabet Inc.YesýNo¨
Google Inc.YesýNo¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Alphabet Inc.¨
Google Inc.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Alphabet Inc.Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filer¨Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨
Google Inc.Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filer¨Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

At

Alphabet Inc.Yes¨Noý
Google Inc.Yes¨Noý
As of June 30, 2012,2015, the aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates of Google Inc. (the predecessor issuer pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the registrantSecurities Exchange Act) (based upon the closing sale priceprices of such shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 29, 2012)30, 2015) was $134,705,433,770.

At January 23, 2013,approximately $311.0 billion. For purposes of calculating the aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates, we have assumed that all outstanding shares are held by non-affiliates, except for shares held by each of our executive officers, directors and 5% or greater stockholders. In the case of 5% or greater stockholders, we have not deemed such stockholders to be affiliates unless there are facts and circumstances which would indicate that such stockholders exercise any control over our company, or unless they hold 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. These assumptions should not be deemed to constitute an admission that all executive officers, directors and 5% or greater stockholders are, in fact, affiliates of our company, or that there are not other persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of our company. Further information concerning shareholdings of our officers, directors and principal stockholders is included or incorporated by reference in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of February 1, 2016, the following amounts were 267,500,149outstanding for Alphabet Inc. (the successor issuer pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act as of October 2, 2015) (Alphabet): 292,580,627 shares of the registrant’sAlphabet's Class A common stock outstanding and 62,163,063stock; 50,199,837 shares of the registrant’sAlphabet’s Class B common stock; and 345,539,303 shares of Alphabet’s Class C capital stock outstanding.

 ____________________________________________________________________
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

2015.



Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Explanatory Note
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is a combined report being separately filed by Google Inc.

("Google") and Alphabet Inc. ("Alphabet"), the successor issuer to, and parent holding company of, Google. Alphabet owns all of the equity interests in Google, and Google meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a), (b) and (d) of Form 10-K

and is therefore filing its information within this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format. Each of Alphabet and Google is filing on its own behalf the information contained in this report that relates to itself, and neither registrant makes any representation as to information relating to the other registrant. Where information or an explanation is provided that is substantially the same for each registrant, such information or explanation has been combined in this report. Where information or an explanation is not substantially the same for each registrant, separate information and explanation has been provided. In addition, separate consolidated financial statements for each registrant, along with notes to the consolidated financial statements, are included in this report. Unless indicated otherwise, throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we refer to Alphabet and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Google and its consolidated subsidiaries, as "we," "us," and "our;" Alphabet Inc. and its subsidiaries as "Alphabet;" and Google Inc. and its subsidiaries as "Google."



Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012

2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page

  
1PART I 
Item 1.

PART I

Item 1A.

Item 1.

1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
  
3PART II 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors10

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments25

Item 2.

Properties25

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings25

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures25

PART II

Item 5.

26

Item 6.

29

Item 7.

30

Item 7A.

49

Item 8.

51

Item 9.

Item 9A.
Item 9B.
  
91PART III 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures91

Item 9B.

Other Information91

PART III

Item 10.

92

Item 11.

92

Item 12.

92

Item 13.

Item 14.
  
92PART IV 

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services92

PART IV

Item 15.

93


i


Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding:

the growth of our business and revenues and our expectations about the factors that influence our success and trends in our business;

our plans to continue to invest in new businesses, products and technologies, systems, facilities, and infrastructure, to continue to hire aggressively and provide competitive compensation programs, as well as to continue to invest in acquisitions;

seasonal fluctuations in internet usage and advertiser expenditures, traditional retail seasonality and macroeconomic conditions, which are likely to cause fluctuations in our quarterly results;

our plans to continue to invest in systems, facilities, and infrastructure, to increase in our hiring and provide competitive compensation programs, as well as to continue our current pace of acquisitions;

the potential for declines in our revenue growth rate;

our expectation that growth in advertising revenues from our websites will continue to exceed that from our Google Network Members’Members' websites, which will have a positive impact on our operating margins;

our expectation that we will continue to pay most of the fees we receive from advertisers to our Google Network Members;

our expectations about the impact of our acquisition of Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. (Motorola) on our results and business and our ability to realize the expected benefits from the acquisition and successfully implement our plans and expectations for Motorola’s business;

our expectation that we will continue to take steps to improve the relevance of the ads we deliver and to reduce the number of accidental clicks;

fluctuations in aggregatethe rate of change in revenue and revenue growth, as well as the rate of change in paid clicks and average cost-per-click;

cost-per-click and various factors contributing to such fluctuations;

our belief that our foreign exchange risk management program will not fully offset theour net exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

the expected increase of costs related to hedging activities under our foreign exchange risk management program;

our expectation that our cost of revenues, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses will increase in dollars and may increase as a percentage of revenues;

our potential exposure in connection with pending investigations, proceedings, and proceedings;

other contingencies;

our expectations about our board of directors’ intention to declare a dividend of shares of the new Class C capital stock, as well as the timing of that dividend, if declared and paid;

our expectation that our traffic acquisition costs will fluctuate in the future;

our continued investments in international markets;

estimates of our future compensation expenses;

fluctuations in our effective tax rate;

the sufficiency of our sources of funding;

our payment terms to certain advertisers, which may increase our working capital requirements;

fluctuations in our capital expenditures;

our expectations aboutrelated to the new operating structure implemented pursuant to the holding company reorganization and the associated disclosure implications;

the expected timing and amount of disposition ofAlphabet Inc.'s stock repurchase;
our intention to align our capital structure so that debt is held at the Home business;

holding company level;

as well as other statements regarding our future operations, financial condition and prospects, and business strategies. Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this report, including without limitation, the

following sections: Item 1 “Business,”"Business," Item 1A “Risk"Risk Factors," and Item 7 “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “will"anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "projects," "will be,” “will" "will continue,” “will" "will likely result," and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in particular, the risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this report and those discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

As used herein, “Google,” “we,” “our,”"our company," "we," "us," "our," and similar terms includerefer collectively to Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc. and its, together with their subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

“Google”

"Alphabet," "Google," and other trademarks of ours appearing in this report are our property. This report contains additional trade names and trademarks of other companies. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’companies' trade names or trademarks to imply an endorsement or sponsorship of us by such companies, or any relationship with any of these companies.


1

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Overview

Google

As our founders Larry and Sergey wrote in the original founders letter, "Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one." As part of that, they also explained that you could expect us to make "smaller bets in areas that might seem very speculative or even strange when compared to our current businesses." From the start, the company has always strived to do more, and to do important and meaningful things with the resources we have.
To help accelerate this, we announced plans in August 2015 to create a new public holding company, called Alphabet. Alphabet is a global technology leader focused on improvingcollection of businesses -- the ways people connect with information. We aspire to buildlargest of which, of course, is Google. It also includes businesses that we combine as Other Bets and generally are pretty far afield of our main Internet products such as Verily, Calico, X, Nest, GV, Google Capital and provide services that improve the lives of billions of people globally.Access/Google Fiber. Our missionAlphabet structure is to organize the world’s informationabout helping businesses within Alphabet prosper through strong leaders and make it universally accessible and useful. Ourindependence.
At Google, our innovations in web search and advertising have made our website a top internet propertywidely used and our brand one of the most recognized in the world.

Our Motorola business is comprised of two operating segments. The Mobile segment is focused on mobile wireless devices and related products and services. The Home segment is focused on technologies and devices that provide video entertainment services to consumers by enabling subscribers to access a variety of interactive digital television services.

We generate revenuerevenues primarily by delivering online advertising that consumers find relevant cost-effective onlineand that advertisers find cost-effective. Google's core products such as Search, Android, Maps, Chrome, YouTube, Google Play and Gmail each have over one billion monthly active users. And we believe we are just beginning to scratch the surface. Google's vision is to remain a place of incredible creativity and innovation that uses our technical expertise to tackle big problems. Our Other Bets are also making important strides in their industries, and our goal is for them to become thriving, successful businesses in the long term.

Serving Our Users
In many ways Google search -- and the clean white page with the blinking cursor -- is a metaphor for how we think about innovation. Imagining the ways things could be -- without constraint -- is the process we use to look for better answers to some of life's everyday problems. It's about starting with the "What if?" and then working relentlessly to see if we can find the answer.
It's been that way from the beginning; providing ways to access knowledge and information has been core to Google and our products have come a long way in the last decade. We used to show just ten blue links in our results. You had to click through to different websites to get your answers, which took time. Now we are increasingly able to provide direct answers -- even if you're speaking your question using Voice Search -- which makes it quicker, easier and more natural to find what you're looking for.
Over time, we have added other services that let you access information quickly and easily. What if we could develop a smarter email service with plenty of storage? That's Gmail. What if we could make a simpler, speedier, safer browser? That's Chrome. What if we could provide easy access to movies, books, music and apps, no matter which device you're on? That's Google Play. What if developers could use Google's infrastructure to easily build and scale applications? And what if people could collaborate and get work done from anywhere on any device? That's cloud and apps.
As devices proliferate, it's more and more important to ensure that you can navigate effortlessly across them -- that the technology gets out of the way, so you can move through this multi-screen world as easily as possible. It's why we're investing so much in platforms like our Chrome browser, Chrome OS and our Android mobile operating system. Ultimately, we want you to have speedy, secure access to whatever you need, wherever you happen to be, and on whatever device you may be using at the time.
Ads as Answers
We asked, what if ads weren't intrusive and annoying? What if we could deliver a relevant ad at just the right time and give people useful commercial information? What if we could provide products that allow for better attribution and measurement across screens so that we show great ads for the right people?
Our advertising solutions help millions of companies grow their businesses, and we offer a wide range of products across screens and devices. We generate revenues primarily by delivering both performance advertising and brand advertising. Businesses
Performance advertising creates and delivers relevant ads that users will click, leading to direct engagement with advertisers. Most of our performance advertisers pay us when a user engages in their ads. Performance advertising lets our advertisers connect with users while driving measurable results.

2

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

For performance advertisers, AdWords, our primary auction-based advertising program, helps create simple text-based ads that appear on Google websites and the websites of Google Network Members, who use our AdWords programadvertising programs to promotedeliver relevant ads alongside their productssearch results and services with targeted advertising.content. In addition, the third partiesour partners that comprise the Google Network use our AdSense program to deliver relevant ads that generate revenues and enhance the user experience. We also generate revenues from Motorola by selling hardware products.

In December 2012,These programs let both small and large businesses connect with users looking for a specific item, say a pair of shoes or a plane ticket back home. To that end, we entered into an agreement with Arris Group, Inc. (Arris)continue to invest in our advertising programs and certain other persons providing for the disposition of our Motorola Home segment. The transaction is expected to close in 2013.

Our business is primarily focused around the following key areas: search, advertising, operating systems and platforms, enterprise and hardware products.

We were incorporated in California in September 1998 and reincorporated in Delaware in August 2003. Our headquarters are located at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, and our telephone number is (650) 253-0000. We completed our initial public offering in August 2004 and our Class A common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “GOOG.”

2012 Corporate Highlights

Android—The growth of our Android operating system continues to impress with approximately half a billion Android devices activated globally through September 2012.

Google Play—We launched Google Play, an entirely cloud-based, digital entertainment destination with more than 700,000 apps and games plus music, movies and books that our users can find, enjoy and share on the web and on their Android phone or tablet.

Social—“Growing the + and shipping the Google.” In 2011, we launched Google+, a new way to share online just like users do in the real world, sharing different things with different people. In late 2011 and continuing in 2012, we have tightened integration between Google+ and our other Google properties, such as Gmail and YouTube and now have 235 million active users across our Google properties.

Nexus 7 Tablet—We launched a powerful new tablet in June 2012 with a vibrant, 7” high-definition display. The Tegra-3 chipset, with a quad-core CPU and 12-core GPU, makes everything, including games, extremely fast. And at only 340 grams, lighter than most tablets, Nexus 7 was built to bring users the best of Google that can be held in the palm of the user’s hand.

Google Now—We introduced Google Now, a predictive search feature that gets you just the right information at just the right time. It tells you the day’s weather before you start your day, how much traffic to expect before you leave for work or school, when the next train will arrive as you’re standing on the platform, or your favorite team’s score while they’re playing – all automatically with cards appearing throughout the day at the moment you need them.

Knowledge Graph—Google’s Knowledge Graph, introduced in 2012, enables the user to search for things, people or places that Google knows about – landmarks, celebrities, cities, sports teams, buildings, geographical features, movies, works of arts and more – and enhances Google Search by understanding the ambiguities in language and by better understanding a user’s query.

On December 19, 2012, Google and Arris announced that Motorola Mobility had entered into an agreement (Motorola Agreement) with Arris and certain other persons providing for the disposition of the Home business for total consideration of approximately $2.35 billion in cash and common stock, subject to certain adjustments. Arris announced in January 2013 that it has agreed to sell approximately 10.6 million shares of its common stock, valued at $150.0 million, to Comcast Corporation with the closing of the Comcast investment and the Home business disposition expected to occur simultaneously. As provided for in the Motorola Agreement, the Comcast transaction will reduce the amount of stock consideration and increase the amount of cash consideration to be received by Google, but will not affect the total consideration. Specifically, the shares issued to Comcast will reduce, on a share-for-share basis, the number of shares of Arris common stock to be issued to Google and simultaneously increase the cash consideration to be received by Google by $150.0 million. Assuming the completion of the Comcast transaction, Comcast and Google will each own approximately 7.85% of the outstanding Arris common stock post-closing based on Arris’ capitalization as of the date of Arris’ announcement of the Comcast transaction. The disposition of the Home business to Arris is not contingent upon Arris’ sale of common stock to Comcast. In the event that Arris’ sale of common stock to Comcast does not close for any reason, there will be no reduction in the amount of shares of Arris common stock to be issued to Google and no corresponding increase in the amount of cash consideration. In that case, Google will own approximately 15.7% of the outstanding Arris common stock post-closing based on Arris’ capitalization as of the date of the Arris’ announced transaction with Google. The disposition of the Home business is expected to close in 2013.

In January 2013, the FTC closed its investigations into our business practices, including search and advertising. In connection with the closing of the investigation, we have voluntarily agreed to make certain product changes. In addition, wesignificant upgrades, including Estimated Total Conversions, which help advertisers measure the effectiveness of their campaigns in a multi-screen world.

Brand advertising helps enhance users' awareness of and Motorola have entered into a consent orderaffinity with the FTC setting forth certain guidelines on our use of standards-essential patents in litigation.

Search

Our search technologies sort through an ever-growing amount of information to deliver relevant and useful search results in response to user queries. We integrate innovative features into our search service and offer specialized search services to help users tailor their search. In addition, we are constantly improving and adding to ouradvertisers' products and services, to provide users with more relevant results so that users find what they are looking for faster. For instance, when users want to plan a trip, Flight Search is a feature that makes it easy for users to find flights that meet their needs. Whether they have a specific destination with dates in mind or not, Flight Search can help users quickly find the best options for their trips. We also offer Product Listing Ads, which include richer product information, such as product image, price, and merchant information, without requiring additional keywords or ad text.

In January 2012, we launched Search plus Your World. Now, when a user performs a signed-in search on Google, the user’s results page may include Google+ content from people that the user is close to (or might be interested in following). Relevant Google+ profiles and Google+ pages related to a specific topic or area of interest may also appear on a user’s results page.

In 2012, we also introduced Google Now and Google’s Knowledge Graph. Google Now is a predictive search feature that gets you just the right information at just the right time. It tells you the day’s weather before you start your day, how much traffic to expect before you leave for work or school, when the next train will arrive as you’re standing on the platform, or your favorite team’s score while they’re playing—all automatically with cards appearing throughout the day at the moment you need them. Google’s Knowledge Graph, introduced in 2012,

enables the user to search for things, people or places that Google knows about – landmarks, celebrities, cities, sports teams, buildings, geographical features, movies, works of arts and more – and enhances Google Search in three main ways:

Find the Right Thing—By understanding the ambiguities and nuances in language the way users do, the Knowledge Graph makes Google Search more intelligent and relevant.

Get the Best Summary—With the Knowledge Graph, we can better understand a user’s query, so that we can summarize relevant content around that topic, including key facts users likely need for that particular query.

Go Deeper and Broader—The Knowledge Graph can help you make some unexpected discoveries. We’ve always believed that the perfect search engine should understand exactly what you mean and give you back exactly what you want. And we can sometimes help answer your next question before you’ve asked it, because the facts we show are informed by what other people have searched for.

Advertising

Google Search. The goal of AdWords, our primary auction-based advertising program, is to deliver ads that are so useful and relevant to search queries or web content that they are a form of information in their own right. With AdWords, advertisers create simple text-based ads that then appear beside related search results or web content on our websites and on thousands of partner websites in our Google Network, which is the network of third parties that use our advertising programs to deliver relevant ads with their search results and content. Most of our AdWords customers pay us on a cost-per-click basis, which means that an advertiser pays us only when a user clicks on one of its ads. We also offer AdWords on a cost-per-impression basis that enables advertisers to pay us based on the number of times their ads appear on our websites and our Google Network Members’ websites as specified by the advertiser.

Our AdSense program enables websites that are part of the Google Network to deliver ads from our AdWords advertisers that are relevant to the search results or content on their websites. We share the majority of the revenues generated from these ads with the Google Network Members that display the ads. The AdSense program enables advertisers to extend the reach of their ad campaigns, improves our partners’ ability to generate revenue from their content, and delivers relevant ads for their users.

To make mobile ad buying seamless and accessible for more than a million AdWords advertisers, we integrated our AdMob technology directly into our AdWords system in June 2012. This enables advertisers to run effective campaigns across the more than 300,000 mobile applications running ads by AdMob – all from within the AdWords interface. AdWords advertisers can now manage, measure and adjust search, display and video ads, reaching people on more than 2 million websites and hundreds of thousands of apps, across all screens.

Google Display. Display advertising comprises thethrough videos, text, images, and other interactive ads that run across various devices. We help brand advertisers deliver digital videos and other types of ads to specific audiences for their brand-building marketing campaigns and in turn, generate revenue by distributing their ads such as the webTrueView ads displayed on computersour YouTube videos.

We have built a world-class ad technology platform for brand advertisers, agencies, and publishers to power their digital marketing businesses. We aim to ensure great user experiences by serving the right ads at the right time and by building deep partnerships with brands and agencies. We also seek to improve the measurability of the effectiveness of brand advertising.
Furthermore, we have invested significantly in programmatic advertising to help advertisers reach users when and where it matters, giving them access to top-tier inventory across screens and formats, as well as the real-time insights that advertisers need to make their buys count.
We have allocated substantial resources to stopping bad advertising practices and protecting users on the web. We focus on creatingthe best advertising experiences for our users and advertisers in many ways,ranging from removing hundreds of millions of bad ads from our systems every year to closely monitoring the sites and apps that show our ads and blacklisting them when necessary to ensure that our ads do not fund bad content.
Bringing the Next 5 Billion Online
Fast search and high-quality ads matter only if you have access to the Internet. Right now, only a fraction of the seven billion people in the world are fortunate enough to be able to get online. That leaves out billions of people. With so much useful and life-changing information available today, it is unfortunate that such a significant portion of the world's population lacks even the most basic Internet connection.
Those people will be able to learn and start businesses, to grow and prosper in ways they simply could not without an Internet connection. Creating platforms for other people's success is a huge part of who we are. We want the world to join us online and to be greeted with the best possible experience once they get there. Connection is powerful; and we are working hard to make it a reality for everyone. The opportunities to improve lives on a grand scale are endless.
And there are people around the world whose lives we can improve every day by bringing information into their homes, into their schools, and into their pockets -- showing them just how powerful the simple idea of "getting online" can be.
At Google, we are helping people get online by tailoring hardware and software experiences that suit the needs of emerging markets, primarily through Android and Chrome. We're also making sure our core Google apps are fast and useful, especially for users in areas where speed, size and connectivity are central concerns.
Other Alphabet companies are pursuing initiatives with similar goals too. That's why we're investing in new projects, like Project Loon. We asked, what if we could use a network of balloons that could fly at the edge of space and provide connectivity in rural and remote areas? Loon has helped students in Brazil and farmers in New Zealand experience the power of an internet connection for the first time. And as the program expands, we hope to bring this to more and more people -- creating opportunities that simply did not exist before for millions of people, all around the world.
Moonshots
The idea of trying new things is reflected in some of our new, ambitious projects both within Google and Other Bets. Everything might not fit into a neat little box. We believe that is exactly how to stay relevant. Many companies get comfortable doing what they have always done, making only incremental changes. This incrementalism leads to irrelevance over time, especially in technology, where change tends to be revolutionary, not evolutionary. People thought we were crazy when we acquired YouTube and Android, and when we launched Chrome. But as those efforts have matured into major platforms for digital video and mobile devices, including smart phones and handheld computers sucha safer, popular browser, respectively, we continue to look towards the future and continue to invest for the long-term.

3

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

We won't become complacent, relying solely on small tweaks as netbooks and tablets. The Google Display Network provides advertisers services related to the delivery of display advertising across publishers participating in our AdSense program, publishers participatingyears wear on. As we said in the DoubleClick Ad Exchange,2004 Founders' IPO Letter, we will not shy away from high-risk, high-reward projects that we believe in because they are the key to our long-term success. We won't stop asking "What if?" and Google-owned sites such as YouTube and Google Finance.

Throughthen working hard to find the answer.

As explained in the letter from our DoubleClick advertising technology,CEO in August 2015, our Alphabet reorganization was implemented to better allow us to structure teams in ways that we provide to publishers, agencies, and advertisersbelieve will produce the ad serving technology, which is the infrastructure that enables billions of ads to be served each day across the web. Our DoubleClick Ad Exchange creates a real-time auction marketplacefastest, most focused innovation possible for the trading of display ad space. We aim to simplify display advertising so it is easier for advertisers and publishers to manage campaigns across different formats, on different websites, and for different devices.

In addition, YouTube provides a range of video, interactive, and other ad formats for advertisers to reach their intended audience. YouTube’s video advertising solutions give advertisers a way to promote their content to the

YouTube community, as well as to associate with content being watched by their target audience. YouTube also offers analytic tools to help advertisers understand their audience and derive general business intelligence. In the past year, YouTube has experienced strong growth in mobile viewers and has established key partnerships with content companies to help monetize mobile video.

Google Mobile.Mobile advertising is still in early innings, though the mobile device is quickly becoming the world’s newest gateway to information. Google is focused on developing easy-to-use ad products to help advertisers extend their reach, help create revenue opportunities for our publisher partners, and deliver relevant and useful ads to users on the go.

Google Mobile extends our products and services by providing mobile-specific features to mobile device users. Our mobile-specific search technologies include search by voice, search by sight, and search by location. Google Mobile also optimizes a large number of Google’s applications for mobile devices in both browser and downloadable form. In addition, we offer advertisers the ability to run search ad campaigns on mobile devices with popular mobile-specific ad formats, such as click-to-call ads in which advertisers can include a phone number within ad text. AdMob also offers effective ad units and solutions for application developers and advertisers. moonshot projects.

Research
We continue to invest in improving users’ access to Google services through their mobile devices.

Google Local. Google is committed to providing users with relevant local information. We’ve organized information around more than 80 million places globally from various sources across the web. Users can find addresses, phone numbers, hours of operation, directions and more for millions of local queries like shops, restaurants, parks and landmarks right on Google.com, on Google Maps and on Google Maps for mobile. They can also discover more places that are right for them by rating the places they’ve been, and getting customized recommendations based on their tastes and those of their friends directly within Google Maps. Ourour existing products and services, also help local business owners manage their online presenceincluding search and connect with potential customers. Millions of business owners have verified their free business listings via Google Places to ensure that users have up-to-date information about their establishments, and to contribute additional details such as photos and products/services offered. Google Offers brings people daily deals from local and national businesses, redeemable for discounted goods or services. From restaurants to spa treatments to outdoor adventures, Google has deals from the best businesses a city has to offeradvertising, as well as popular national brands.

Operating Systems and Platforms

Android. Working closely with the Open Handset Alliance, a business alliance of more than 75 technology and mobile companies, we developed Android, a free, fully open source mobile software platform that any developer can use to create applications for mobile devices and any handset manufacturer can install on a device. We believe Android will drive greater innovation and choice in the mobile device ecosystem, and provide consumers with a more powerful mobile experience.

Google Chrome OS and Google Chrome.Google Chrome OS is an open source operating system with the Google Chrome web browser as its foundation. Both the Google Chrome OS and the Google Chrome browser are built around the core tenets of speed, simplicity, and security. Designed for people who spend most of their time on the web, the Google Chrome OS is a new approach to operating systems. We are working with several original equipment manufacturers to bring computers running Google Chrome OS to users and businesses. The Chrome browser runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux computers.

Google+. Google+ is a new way to share online just like users do in the real world, sharing different things with different people. In late 2011 and continuing in 2012, we have tightened integration between Google+ and our other Google properties, such as Gmail and YouTube and now have 235 million active users across our Google properties.

Google Play. Google Play is an entirely cloud-based, digital entertainment destination with more than 700,000 apps and games plus music, movies and books that our users can find, enjoy and share on the web and on their Android phone or tablet.

Google Drive. Google Drive is a place where users can create, share, collaborate, and keep all of their stuff. Google Docs is built right into Google Drive so users can work with others in real time on documents, spreadsheets and presentations and users’ files go everywhere they do. When users change a file on the web, on their computer, or on their mobile device, the file updates on every device where users have installed Google Drive.

Google Wallet. Google Wallet is a virtual wallet that securely stores your credit and debit cards, offers, and rewards cards. Users can tap their phone to pay in-store using Google Wallet anywhere contactless payments are accepted – at over 200,000 merchants across the United States. Users can also pay online by signing into their Google Wallet account.

Google TV. Google TV is a platform that gives consumers the power to experience television and the internet on a single screen, with the ability to search and find the content they want to watch. The Google TV platform is based on the Android operating system and runs the Google Chrome browser.

Enterprise

Google’s enterprise products provide familiar, easy-to-use Google technology for business settings. Through Google Apps, which includes Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Google Sites, among other features, we provide hosted, web-based applications that people can use on any device with a browser and an internet connection. In addition, we provide our search technology for use within enterprises through the Google Search Appliance (real-time search of business applications, intranet applications, and public websites), on their public-facing sites with Google Site Search (custom search engine), and Google Commerce Search (for online retail enterprises). We also provide versions of our Google Maps Application Programming Interface (API) for businesses (including fully interactive Google Maps for public and internal websites), as well as Google Earth Enterprise (a behind-the-company-firewall software solution for imagery and data visualization). Our enterprise solutions have been adopted by a variety of businesses, governments, schools, and non-profit organizations. Google Apps is the first cloud computing suite of message and collaboration tools to receive U.S. government security certification.

Motorola

Our Motorola Mobility business is comprised of two operating segments. The Mobile segment is focused on mobile wireless devices and related products and services. The Home segment is focused on technologies and devices that provide video entertainment services to consumers by enabling subscribers to access a variety of interactive digital television services. In December 2012, we entered into an agreement with Arris Group, Inc. and certain other persons providing for the disposition of our Home segment. The transaction is expected to close in 2013.

Research

We continue to developdeveloping new products and services and to enhance our existing ones through research and product development and the licensing and acquisition of third-party businesses and technology. Our product development philosophy is to launch innovative products early and often, and then iterate rapidly to make those products even better.development. We often post early stage products at test locations online or directly on Google.com.release early-stage products. We then use data and user feedback to decide if and how to invest further in those products.

Our research and development expenses, which includes the vast majority of engineering and technical headcount responsible for research and development, as well as their associated costs, were $3.8$7.1 billion, $5.2$9.8 billion, and $6.8$12.3 billion in 2010, 2011,2013, 2014 and 2012,2015, respectively, which included stock-based compensation expense of $861 million, $1.1$1.6 billion, $2.2 billion, and $1.3$2.7 billion, respectively. We expect to continue investing in hiring talented employees and building systems to invest in building the employee and systems infrastructures needed to support the development ofdevelop new products and services and to improve existing ones.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of intellectual property laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology and our brand. We have registered, and applied for the registration of, U.S. and international trademarks, service marks, domain names, and copyrights. Additionally, we have filed U.S. and international patent applications covering certain of our proprietary technology. Over time, we have assembled a portfolio of patents, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, domain names, and trade secrets covering our products and services. Our proprietary technology is not dependent on any single patent or copyright or groups of related patents or copyrights. We believe the duration of our patents is adequate relative to the expected lives of our products. Although we rigorously protect our proprietary technology, any significant impairment of, or third-party claim against, our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete.

Sales and Support

We continue to develop and grow our sales and support infrastructure. We have over 85 offices in over 40 countries, the large majority of which include sales people. Our global sales and support infrastructure has specialized teams across vertical markets. We bring businesses into our advertising network through direct, remote, and online sales channels, using technology and automation wherever possible to improve our customers’ experience and to grow our business cost-effectively. Our direct advertising and sales teams focus on building relationships with the largest advertisers and leading internet companies. We have built a multi-product sales force, with teams selling campaigns that include search, display (including DoubleClick and YouTube), and mobile advertising.

We provide customer service to our advertiser base through our global support organization. Our global support organization concentrates on helping our advertisers and Google Network Members get the most out of their relationship with us.

No individual customer or groups of affiliated customers represented more than 10% of our revenues in 2010, 2011, or 2012.

Government Contracts

No material portion of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. government.

Marketing

Google’s global brand is well known. We believe that building a trusted, highly recognized brand begins with providing high-quality products and services that make a notable difference in people’s lives. Marketing is responsible for generating advertiser revenue through marketing campaigns to small businesses, as well as providing thought leadership to chief marketing officers through industry insight, research, and analysis. Our marketing, promotional, and public relations activities are designed to promote Google’s brand image and differentiate it from competitors.

Competition

Our business is characterized by rapid change and converging, as well as new and disruptive technologies. We face formidable competition in every aspect of our business, particularly from companies that seek to connect people with online information on the web and provide them with relevant advertising. We face competition from:

General purpose search engines and information services, such as Yahoo, Microsoft's Bing, Yandex, Baidu, Naver, WebCrawler, and Microsoft’s Bing.

MyWebSearch.

Vertical search engines and e-commerce websites, such as Kayak (travel queries), Monster.comLinkedIn (job queries), WebMD (for health(health queries), and Amazon.comAmazon and eBay (e-commerce). Some users will navigate directly to such content, websites, and apps rather than go through Google.

Social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter. Some users are increasingly relying more on social networks for product or service referrals, rather than seeking information through general purposetraditional search engines.

Other forms of advertising, such as television, radio, newspapers, magazines, billboards, and yellow pages, for ad dollars.pages. Our advertisers typically advertise in multiple media, both online and offline.

Mobile applications on iPhoneOther online advertising platforms and Android devices, which allow users to access information directly from a publisher without using search engines.

networks, including Criteo, AppNexus, and Facebook, that compete for advertisers with AdWords, our primary auction-based advertising program.

Other operating systems and mobile device companies.

Providers of online products and services that provide answers, information, and services. A number of our online products and services, including Gmail, YouTube, and Google Docs, compete directly with new and established companies, which offer communication, information, storage and entertainment services, either on a stand-alone basis or integrated into theirother offerings.
Competing successfully depends heavily on our ability to rapidly deliver innovative products or media properties.

We competeand technologies to the marketplace so that we can attract and retain users,retain:

Users, for whom other products and services are literally one click away, primarily on the basis of the relevance and usefulness of our search results and the features, availability, and ease of use of our products and services.

We also compete

Advertisers, primarily based on our ability to attractgenerate sales leads, and retain contentultimately customers, and to deliver their advertisements in an efficient and effective manner across a variety of distribution channels.
Content providers (Google Network Members, the parties who use our advertising programs to deliver relevant ads alongside their search results and content, as well as other content providers for whom we distribute or license content), primarily based on the size and quality of our advertiser base, our ability to help these partners generate revenues from advertising, and the terms of our agreements with them.

Government Regulation

Intellectual Property
We are subjectrely on various intellectual property laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to numerous domesticprotect our proprietary technology and our brand. We have registered, and applied for the registration of, U.S. and international trademarks service marks, domain names and copyrights. We have also filed patent applications in the U.S. and foreign laws

4

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

countries covering certain of our technology, and regulations covering a wide variety of subject matter. New lawsacquired patent assets to supplement our portfolio. We have licensed in the past, and regulations (or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations)expect that we may also impact our business. The costs of compliance with these laws and regulations are high and are likely to increaselicense in the future, and any failure oncertain of our partrights to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities and other penalties.

parties.

Culture and Employees

We take great pride in our culture. We embrace collaboration and creativity, and encourage the iteration of ideas to address complex technical challenges. Transparency and open dialogdialogue are central to us,how we work, and we like to ensure that company news reaches our employees first through internal channels.

Despite our rapid growth, we still cherish our roots as a startup and givewherever possible empower employees the freedom to act on theirgreat ideas regardless of their role or function within the company. We strive to hire the bestgreat employees, with backgrounds and perspectives as diverse as those of our global users. We work to provide an environment where these talented people can have fulfilling careers working onaddressing some of the biggest challenges in technology and have a huge, positive impact on the world.

Atsociety.

Our employees are among our best assets and are critical for our continued success. We expect to continue investing in hiring talented employees and to provide competitive compensation programs to our employees. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had 53,86161,814 full-time employees, consisting of 19,746employees: 23,336 in research and development, 15,30619,082 in sales and marketing, 6,21410,944 in operations, and 8,452 in general and administrative and 12,595 in operations. All of Google’s full-time employees are also equityholders, with significant collective employee ownership.functions. Although we have workswork councils and statutory employee representation obligations in certain countries, our U.S. employees are not represented by a labor union and we consider our employee relations to be good.union. Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense, particularly for software engineers, computer scientists, and other technical staff.

Global Operations and Geographic Data

We provide our products and services in more than 100 languages and in more than 50 countries, regions, and territories. On www.google.com or one of our other Google domains, users can find information in many

different languages and in many different formats. The United States accounted for approximately 47% of our revenues in 2012. Information regarding financial data by geographic areas is set forth in Item 7 and Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

Seasonality

Our business is affected by both seasonal fluctuations in internetInternet usage and traditional retail seasonality. Internet usage generally slows during the summer months, and commercial queries typically increase significantly in the fourth quarter of each year. These seasonal trends have caused
Information about Segments and will likely continueGeographic Areas
Please refer to cause, fluctuationsNote 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequential revenue growth rates.

Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Other Matters
As part of the Alphabet reorganization, we expect to convert Google Inc. into a limited liability company.
Available Information

Our website iswebsites are located at www.google.com and www.abc.xyz, and our investor relations website is located at http://investor.google.com. The following filings are available through our investor relations website after we file them with the SEC:www.abc.xyz/investor. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and our Proxy Statements forare available through our annual meetings of stockholders, for the last three years. These filings are also available for downloadinvestor relations website, free of charge, on our investor relations website.after we file them with the SEC. We also provide a link to the section of the SEC’sSEC's website at www.sec.gov that has all of our public filings, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, all amendments to thosethe reports our Proxy Statements,that we file or furnish with the SEC. You may read and other ownership related filings. Further, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is locatedany materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’sSEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. InformationYou can get information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

We webcast via our investor relations website our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or host with members of the investment community on ourcommunity. Our investor relations website. Additionally, we providewebsite also provides notifications of news or announcements regarding our financial performance, including SEC filings, investor events, press and earnings releases, and blogs as part of our investor relations website as well as on our investor relations Google+ page (https://plus.google.com/+GoogleInvestorRelations/posts). Investors and others can receive notifications of new information posted on our investor relations website in real time by signing up for email alerts and RSS feeds.blogs. Further corporate governance information, including our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, governance guidelines, board committee charters, and code of conduct, is also available on our investor relations website under the heading “Corporate Governance.”"Other." The contentscontent of our websites are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.


5

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our common and capital stock.

Risks Related to Our BusinessBusinesses and Industry

Industries

We face intense competition. If we do not continue to innovate and provide products and services that are useful to users, we may not remain competitive, and our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our business isbusinesses are rapidly evolving, and intensely competitive, and is subject to changing technologies, shifting user needs, and frequent introductions of new products and services. Our ability to competeCompeting successfully depends heavily on providing products and services that make using the internet a more useful and enjoyable experience for our users and deliveringability to deliver innovative products and technologies to the marketplace. Withmarketplace rapidly and, for Google, provide products and services that make our acquisition of Motorola,search results and ads relevant and useful for our users. As our businesses evolve, the competitive pressure to innovate will now encompass a wider range of products and services, including products and services that may be outside of our historical core business.

We have many competitors in different industries, including general purpose search engines and information services, vertical search engines and e-commerce sites,websites, social networking sites, traditional media companies, wireless mobile device companies, andnetworks, providers of online products and services.services, other forms of advertising and online advertising platforms and networks, other operating systems, and wireless mobile device companies. Our current and potential domestic and international competitors range from large and established companies to emerging start-ups. Established companies have longer operating histories and more established relationships with customers and users, and they can use their experienceexperiences and resources in ways that could affect our competitive position, including by making acquisitions, investing aggressivelycontinuing to invest heavily in research and development, aggressively initiating intellectual property claims (whether or not meritorious), and competingcontinuing to compete aggressively for advertisers and websites. Emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and provide products and services faster than we can.

can or may foresee the consumer need for products and services before us.

Our competitors are constantly developing innovations in web search, online advertising, wireless mobile devices, operating systems, and many other web-based products and services. The research and development of new, technologically advanced products is also a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation and investment, as well as the accurate anticipation of technology, market trends, and consumer needs. As a result, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, including through acquisitions, in order to enhance our web search technology and our existing products and services, and introduce new products and services that people can easily and effectively use. If we are unable to provide quality products and services, then acceptance rates for our products and services could decline and affect consumer and advertiser perceptions of our brand.decline. In addition, these new products and services may present new and difficult technological and legal challenges, and we may be subject to claims if users of these offerings experience service disruptions or failures or other issues. Our operating results would also suffer if our innovations are not responsive to the needs of our users, advertisers, and Google Network Members, are not appropriately timed with market opportunities, or are not effectively brought to market. As technology continues to develop, our competitors may be able to offer user experiences that are, or that are seen to be, substantially similar to or better than ours. This may force us to compete in different ways and expend significant resources in order to remain competitive. If our competitors are more successful than we are in developing compelling products or in attracting and retaining users, advertisers, and content providers, our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our ongoing investment in new business strategiesbusinesses and new products, services, and technologies is inherently risky, and could disrupt our ongoing businesses.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest in new business strategies,businesses, products, services, and technologies. Such endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, insufficient revenues from such investments to offset any new liabilities assumed and expenses associated with these new investments, inadequate return of capital on our investments, distraction of management from current operations, and unidentified issues not discovered in our due diligence of such strategies and offerings.offerings that could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such investments and incur unanticipated liabilities. Because these new ventures are inherently risky, no assurance can be given that such strategies and offerings will be successful and will not adversely affect our reputation, financial condition, and operating results.

Acquisitions


6

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

More people are using devices other than desktop computers to access the Internet and investments could result inaccessing new devices to make search queries. If manufacturers and users do not widely adopt versions of our search technology, products, or operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful consequences that may adversely impactsystems developed for these devices, our business could be adversely affected.
The number of people who access the Internet through devices other than desktop computers, including mobile phones, smartphones, handheld computers such as netbooks and results of operations.

Acquisitions are an important elementtablets, video game consoles, and television set-top devices, is increasing dramatically. The functionality and user experience associated with some alternative devices may make the use of our overall corporate strategyproducts and useservices through such devices more difficult (or just different) and the versions of capital,our products and services developed for these devices may not be compelling to users, manufacturers, or distributors of alternative devices. Each manufacturer or distributor may establish unique technical standards for its devices, and our products and services may not work or be viewable on these devices as a result. Some manufacturers may also elect not to include our products on their devices. In addition, search queries are increasingly being undertaken via “apps” tailored to particular devices or social media platforms, which could affect our search and advertising business over time. As new devices and platforms are continually being released, it is difficult to predict the problems we expectmay encounter in adapting our current pace of acquisitions to continue. These transactions could be material to our financial conditionproducts and results of operations.services and developing competitive new products and services. We also expect to continue to evaluatedevote significant resources to the creation, support, and enter into discussions regardingmaintenance of products and services across multiple platforms and devices. If we are unable to attract and retain a wide arraysubstantial number of potential strategic transactions. The process of integrating an acquired company, business,alternative device manufacturers, distributors, developers, and users to our products and services, or technology has created,if we are slow to develop products and will continue to create, unforeseen operating difficultiestechnologies that are more compatible with alternative devices and expenditures. The areas whereplatforms, we face risks include:

Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to acquisition integration challenges.

Failure to successfully further develop the acquired business or technology.

Implementation or remediation of controls, procedures, and policies at the acquired company.

Integration of the acquired company’s accounting, human resource, and other administrative systems, and coordination of product, engineering, and sales and marketing functions.

Transition of operations, users, and customers onto our existing platforms.

Failure to obtain required approvals on a timely basis, if at all, from governmental authorities, or conditions placed upon approval, under competition and antitrust laws which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, or otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of an acquisition.

In the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries.

Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization, and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire.

Liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including patent and trademark infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities, and other known and unknown liabilities.

Litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, customers, former stockholders, or other third parties.

Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us towill fail to realizecapture the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities,opportunities available as consumers and harm our business generally.

Future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, or impairment of goodwill, and restructuring charges, any of which could harm our financial condition or results. Also, the anticipated benefit of many of our acquisitions may not materialize.

advertisers transition to a dynamic, multi-screen environment.

We generate a significant portion of our revenues from advertising, and a reduction inreduced spending by advertisers or a loss of advertiserspartners could seriously harm our business.

We generated 95%90% of total Google segment revenues from advertising in 2015. Many of our advertisers, in 2012. Followingcompanies that distribute our acquisition of Motorola, we still expect a significant portion of our revenues to come from advertising. Our advertisersproducts and services, digital publishers, and content partners can generally terminate their contracts with us at any time. Advertisers willThose partners may not continue to do business with us if their investment in advertising with us does not generate sales leads, and ultimately customers, or if we do not delivercreate more value (such as increased numbers of users or customers, new sales leads, increased brand awareness, or more effective monetization) than their advertisements in an appropriate and effective manner.available alternatives. If we are unable to remain competitivedo not provide superior value or deliver advertisements efficiently and provide valuecompetitively, we could see a decrease in revenue and other adverse impacts to our advertisers, they may stop placing ads with us,business. Adverse macroeconomic conditions can also have a material negative impact on advertising revenues, which wouldcould adversely affect our revenues and business.

In addition, expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. Adverse macroeconomic conditions can also have a material negative impact on the demand for advertising and cause our advertisers to reduce the amounts they spend on advertising, which could adversely affect our revenues and business.

Our revenue growth rate could decline over time, and we anticipate downward pressure on our operating margin in the future.

Our revenue growth rate could decline over time as a result of a number of factors, including including:
increasing competition,
changes in our productproperty mix, including a significant increase in mobile search queriesplatform mix, and a deceleration in the growth of desktop queries if monetization stays at current levels, and how users make queries

and act on them, geographical mix

the challenges in maintaining our growth rate as our revenues increase to higher levels,
the evolution of the online advertising market, including the increasing variety of online platforms for advertising, and the other markets in which we participate, and
the successrate of user adoption of our investments in new business strategies, products, services, and technologies, such as our acquisition of Motorola.

The revenue growth rate of our Motorola business will also depend on a number of factors, including the success of the new products we plan to introduce, our reliance on several large customers, the absence of long-term exclusivity arrangements with such customers, our ability to gain significant market share in the mobile devices space, our reliance on third-party distributors, representatives and retailers to sell certain of its products and the successful implementation of our product and operating system strategies. Furthermore, industry consolidation in the telecommunications and cable industries could negatively impact Motorola’s business because there would be fewer network operators and it could be more difficult to replace any lost customers. Any of these factors could have a negative impact on Motorola’s business and have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial results.

technologies.

We believe our operating margin willmargins could experience downward pressure as a result of increasing competition and increased expenditurescosts for many aspects of our business, including Motorola.business. For instance, the margin on revenues we generate from our operatingGoogle Network Members is significantly less than the margin on revenues we generate from advertising on Google websites. Consequently, our margins will experience downward pressure if a greater percentage of our revenues comes from ads placed on our Google Network Members’Members' websites compared to revenues generated through ads placed on our own websites or if we spend a proportionately larger amount to promote the distribution of certain products, including Google Chrome. Both the margin on revenues we generate from our Google Network Members and the margin on revenues from our Motorola business are significantly less than the margin on revenues we generate from advertising on our websites. Also, the margins on advertising revenues from mobile devices and newer advertising formats are generally less than the margin on revenues we generate from advertising on our websites. Additionally, the margin we earn on revenues generated from our Google Network Members could decrease in the future if we pay an even larger percentage of advertising fees to our Google Network Members.

Additionally, our margins could experience downward pressure because the margin on the sale of digital content and apps, advertising revenues from mobile devices and newer advertising formats are generally less than the margin on revenues we generate from advertising on our websites or traditional formats. Further, our margins could be impacted

7

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

adversely if we spend a proportionately larger amount to promote or distribute certain products or if we invest more heavily in our R&D efforts across the Company (such as our Other Bets businesses) than we have historically.
We are subject to increased regulatory scrutiny that may negatively impact our business.

The growth of our company and our expansion into a variety of new fields implicateinvolves a variety of new regulatory issues, and we have experienced increased regulatory scrutiny as we have grown. For instance, several regulatory agencies have sought to review our search and other businesses on potential competition concerns. We continue to cooperate with the European Commission (EC), and other international regulatory authorities and several state attorneys generalaround the world in investigations they are conducting with respect to our business and its impact on competition. Legislators and regulators including those conducting investigations in the U.S. and Europe, may make legal and regulatory changes, or interpret and apply existing laws, in ways that make our products and services less useful to our users, require us to incur substantial costs, expose us to unanticipated civil or criminal liability, or cause us to change our business practices. These changes or increased costs could negatively impact our business and results of operations in material ways.

We are regularly subject to claims, suits, government investigations, and other proceedings that may result in adverse outcomes.

We are regularly subject to claims, suits, and government investigations and other proceedings involving competition, and antitrust (such as the pending investigations by the EC), intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes, content generated by our users, goods and services offered by advertisers or publishers using our platforms, and other matters. Our acquisition of Motorola and ourThe sale of hardware products also exposeexposes us to the risk of product liability and other litigation involving assertions about product defects, as well as health and safety, hazardous materials usage, and other environmental concerns. In addition, our businesses face intellectual property litigation, as further discussed later, that exposes us to the risk of exclusion and cease and desist orders, which could limit our ability to sell products and services.

Such claims, suits, and government investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of the outcome, suchany of these types of legal proceedings can have an adverse

impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors. Determining reserves for our pending litigation is a complex, fact-intensive process that requires significant judgment. It is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in substantial fines and penalties that could adversely affect our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows in a particular period. These proceedings could also result in reputational harm, criminal sanctions, consent decrees, or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products, or services, requiring a change in our business practices or product recalls or other field action, or requiring development of non-infringing or otherwise altered products or technologies. Any of these consequences could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

More people

Acquisitions could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other consequences that may adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Acquisitions are using devices other than personal computers to access the internet and accessing new platforms to make search queries. If manufacturers and users do not widely adopt versionsan important element of our web search technology, products, or operating systems developed foroverall corporate strategy and use of capital, and these devices, our businesstransactions could be adversely affected.

The numbermaterial to our financial condition and results of people who access the internet through devices other than personal computers, including mobile phones, smartphones, handheld computers such as netbooks and tablets, video game consoles, and television set-top devices, has increased dramatically in the past few years. The lower resolution, functionality, and memory associated with some alternative devices make the use of our products and services through such devices more difficult and the versions of our products and services developed for these devices may not be compelling to users, manufacturers, or distributors of alternative devices. Each manufacturer or distributor may establish unique technical standards for its devices, and our products and services may not work or be viewable on these devices as a result. Some manufacturers may also elect not to include our products on their devices. In addition, search queries are increasingly being undertaken via “apps” tailored to particular devices or social media platforms, which could affect our share of the search market over time. As new devices and platforms are continually being released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in adapting our products and services and developing competitive new products and services.operations. We expect to continue to devote significant resourcesevaluate and enter into discussions regarding a wide array of potential strategic transactions. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology has created, and will continue to create, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we face risks include:

Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to acquisition integration challenges.
Failure to successfully further develop the creation, support,acquired business or technology.
Implementation or remediation of controls, procedures, and maintenancepolicies at the acquired company.
Integration of mobile productsthe acquired company's accounting, human resource, and services. Ifother administrative systems, and coordination of product, engineering, and sales and marketing functions.
Transition of operations, users, and customers onto our existing platforms.
Failure to obtain required approvals on a timely basis, if at all, from governmental authorities, or conditions placed upon approval, under competition laws which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, or otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of an acquisition or investment.
In the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries.

8

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization, and retention of employees from the businesses we are unableacquire.
Liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including patent and trademark infringement claims, privacy issues, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities, and other known and unknown liabilities.
Litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, customers, former stockholders, or other third parties.
Our failure to attractaddress these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions and retain a substantial number of alternative device manufacturers, distributors, and usersinvestments could cause us to our products and services, or if we are slow to develop products and technologies that are more compatible with alternative devices and platforms, we will fail to capturerealize the opportunities available as consumersanticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities, and advertisers transition to a dynamic, multi-screen environment.

harm our business generally.

Our acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, or impairment of goodwill and/or purchased long-lived assets, and restructuring charges, any of which could harm our financial condition or results. Also, the anticipated benefits or value of our acquisitions or investments may not materialize.
Our business depends on a strong brand, and failing to maintain and enhance our brand would hurt our ability to expand our base of users, advertisers, Google Network Members, and other partners.

The

Our strong Google brand identity that we have developed has significantly contributed to the success of our business. Maintaining and enhancing the “Google” brand is criticalbrands of both Google and Other Bets increases our ability to expandingenter new categories and launch new and innovative products that better serve the needs of our base of users, advertisers, Google Network Members, and other partners. We believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase due to the relatively low barriers to entry in the internet market.users. Our brandbrands may be negatively impacted by a number of factors, including, data protectionamong others, reputational issues and security issues, service outages, and product malfunctions. Ifproduct/technical performance failures. Further, if we fail to maintain and enhance equity in the “Google”Google brand, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business, operating results, and financial condition willmay be materially and adversely affected. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to beremain a technology leader and continue to provide high-quality, innovative products and services which we may not do successfully.

that are truly useful and play a meaningful role in people’s everyday lives.

A variety of new and existing U.S. and foreign laws could subject us to claims or otherwise harm our business.

We are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations covering a wide variety of subject matters. New laws and regulations (or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations) may also impact our business. For example, current and new patent laws such as U.S. patent laws and European patent laws may affect the ability of companies, including us, to protect their innovations and defend against claims of patent infringement. The costs of compliance with these laws and regulations are high and are likely to increase in the future. Any failure on our part to comply with these laws and regulations can result in negative publicity and diversion of management time and effort and may subject us to significant liabilities and other penalties.

Furthermore, many of these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the internet and related technologies and, as a result, do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the internet and related technologies. The laws that do reference the internet are being interpreted by the courts, but their applicability and scope remain uncertain. For example, the laws relating to the liability of providers of online services are currently unsettled both within the U.S. and abroad.

Claims have also been, or may be, threatened and filed against us under both U.S. and foreign laws for defamation, invasion of privacy and other tort claims, unlawful activity, patent, copyright and trademark infringement, product liability, or other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched and the ads posted by our users, our products and services, or content generated by our users. Moreover, recent amendmentsFurthermore, many of these laws do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by a number of our new businesses, products, services and technologies. In addition, the applicability and scope of these laws, as interpreted by the courts, remain uncertain. For example, the laws relating to the liability of providers of online services are currently unsettled both within the U.S. patentand abroad.
In addition, other laws may affect the ability of companies, includingthat could subject us to protect their innovations and defend against claims of patent infringement.

In addition, theor otherwise harm our business include, among others:

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which has provisions that limit in the U.S., but do not necessarily eliminate, our liability for caching or hosting, or for listing or linking to, third-party websites that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights, so long as we comply with the statutory requirements of this act. Any future legislation impacting these safe harbors may adversely impact us.
Court decisions such as the ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling issued by the European court, which allows individuals to demand that Google remove search results about them in certain instances, may limit the content we can show to our users.
Various U.S. and international laws that restrict the distribution of materials considered harmful to children and impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services to collect information from minors. In the area of data
Data protection laws passed by many states have passed laws requiringthat require notification to users when there is a security breach for personal data, such as California’s Information Practices Act.
Data localization laws, which generally mandate that certain types of data collected in a particular country be stored and/or processed within that country.

9

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

We face similar risks and costs overseas as our products and services are offered in international markets and may be subject to additional regulations.

Any failure on our part to comply with these laws and regulations can result in negative publicity and diversion of management time and effort and may subject us to significant liabilities and other penalties.

We are, and may in the future be, subject to intellectual property or other claims, which are costly to defend, could result in significant damage awards, and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

Internet, technology, media, and mediaother companies own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent holding companies may continue to seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. As we have grown, the intellectual property rights claims against us have increased and may continue to increase as we develop new products, services, and technologies.

We have had patent, copyright, and trademark infringement lawsuits filed against us claiming that certain of our products, services, and technologies including Android, Google Search, Google AdWords, Google AdSense, Motorola products, Google Books, Google News, Google Image Search, Google Chrome, Google Talk, Google Voice, and YouTube, infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Third parties have also sought broad injunctive relief against us by filing claims in U.S. and international courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) for exclusion and cease and desist orders, which could limit our ability to sell our products or services in the U.S. or elsewhere if our products or services or those of our customers or suppliers are found to infringe the intellectual property subject to the claims. Adverse results in any of these lawsuits may include awards of substantial monetary damages, costly royalty or licensing agreements (if licenses are available at all), or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products, or services, and may also cause us to change our business practices, and require development of non-infringing products or technologies, which could result in a loss of revenues for us and otherwise harm our business.

Furthermore, in connection with our divestitures, we have agreed, and may in the future agree, to provide indemnification for certain potential liabilities. In addition, many of our agreements with our customers and partners, including certain suppliers, require us to indemnify them for certain intellectual property infringement claims against them, which could increase our costs as a result of defending such claims, and may require that we pay significant damages if there were an adverse ruling in any such claims. Such customers and partners may also discontinue the use of our products, services, and technologies, as a result of injunctions or otherwise, which could result in loss of revenues and adversely impact our business. Moreover, supplier provided intellectual property indemnities provided to us by our suppliers, when obtainable, may not cover all damages and losses suffered by us and our customers from covered products. In addition, in connection with the sale of Motorola’s Home business to Arris Group, Inc. (Arris), we agreed to

indemnify Arris against certain intellectual property infringement litigation, including, among others, a patent infringement claim brought by TiVo relating to certain digital video recording equipment sold by Motorola Mobility.

Regardless of the merits of the claims, intellectual property claims are often time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle, and cause significant diversion of management attention. To the extent such intellectual property infringement claims are successful, they may have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services, and brand.

Our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights are important assets for us. Various events outside of our control pose a threat to our intellectual property rights, as well as to our products, services and technologies. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are distributed or made available through the internet.Internet. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective.

Although we seek to obtain patent protection for our innovations, it is possible we may not be able to protect some of these innovations. Moreover, because of our long-term interests in open source, we may not have adequate patent or copyright protection for certain innovations that later turn out to be important. Furthermore, there is always the possibility, despite our efforts, that the scope of the protection gained will be insufficient or that an issued patent may be deemed invalid or unenforceable.

We also seek to maintain certain intellectual property as trade secrets. The secrecy could be compromised by outside parties, or by our employees, which could cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from these trade secrets.

We also face risks associated with our trademarks. For example, there is a risk that the word “Google” could become so commonly used that it becomes synonymous with the word “search.” If this happens, we could lose protection for this trademark, which could result in other people using the word “Google” to refer to their own products, thus diminishing our brand.


10

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business and our ability to compete. Also, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.

We may be subject to legal liability associated with providing online services or content.

We host and provide a wide variety of services and products that enable users to exchange information, advertise products and services, conduct business, and engage in various online activities both domestically and internationally. The law relating to the liability of providers of these online services and products for activities of their users is still somewhat unsettled both within the U.S. and internationally. Claims have been threatened and have been brought against us for defamation, negligence, breaches of contract, copyright or trademark infringement, unfair competition, unlawful activity, tort, including personal injury, fraud, or other theories based on the nature and content of information whichthat we publish or to which we provide links or that may be posted online or generated by us or by third parties, including our users. In addition, we are and have been and may again in the future be subject to domestic or international actions alleging that certain content we have generated or third-party content that we have made available within our services violates laws in domesticU.S. and international jurisdictions.

non-U.S. law.

We also arrange for the distribution of third-party advertisements to third-party publishers and advertising networks, and we offer third-party products, services, or content. We may be subject to claims concerning these

products, services, or content by virtue of our involvement in marketing, branding, broadcasting, or providing access to them, even if we do not ourselves host, operate, provide, or provide access to these products, services, or content. Defense of any such actions could be costly and involve significant time and attention of our management and other resources, may result in monetary liabilities or penalties, and may require us to change our business in an adverse manner.

Privacy concerns relating to our technology could damage our reputation and deter current and potential users from using our products and services.

From time to time, concerns have been expressed by regulators and others about whether our products, services, or processes compromise the privacy of users and others. Concerns about or regulatory actions involving our practices with regard to the collection, use, disclosure, or security of personal information or other privacy related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and adversely affect our operating results. While we strive to comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, the failure or perceived failure to comply may result, and in some cases has resulted, in inquiries and other proceedings or actions against us by government entities or others, or could cause us to lose users and customers, which could potentially have an adverse effect on our business.

In addition, as nearly all of our products and services are web-based, the amount of data we store for our users on our servers (including personal information) has been increasing. Any systems failure or compromise of our security that results in the release of our users’ data could seriously limit the adoption of our products and services, as well as harm our reputation and brand and, therefore, our business. We expect to continue to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches. The risk that these types of events could seriously harm our business is likely to increase as we expand the number of web-based products and services we offer, and operate in more countries.

Regulatory authorities around the world are considering a number of legislative and regulatory proposals concerning data protection.protection, including measures to ensure that our encryption of users’ data does not hinder law enforcement agencies’ access to that data. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

With our acquisition

Recent legal developments in Europe have created compliance uncertainty regarding certain transfers of Motorola, we face a numberinformation from Europe to the U.S. A preliminary agreement has been reached between the U.S. and European governments to allow for legal certainty regarding transfers of manufacturing and supply chain risks that, if not properly managed, could adversely impact our financial results and prospects.

With our acquisition of Motorola, we face a number of risks related to manufacturing and supply chain management. For instance,data. However, given the products we sell may have quality issues resulting from the design or manufacturepreliminary nature of the product, or from the software used in the product. Sometimes, these issues may be caused by components we purchase from other manufacturers or suppliers. If the quality of our Motorola products does not meet our customers’ expectations or our products are foundagreement, some uncertainty remains, and compliance obligations could cause us to be defective, then our sales and operating earnings, and ultimately our reputation, could be negatively impacted.

We rely on third parties to manufacture many of Motorola’s assemblies and finished products, and we have third-party arrangements for the design of some components and parts. Our Motorola business could be negatively affected if we are not able to engage third parties with the necessary capabilities or capacity on reasonable terms, or if those we engage fail to meet their obligations (whether due to financial difficulties or other reasons), or make adverse changes in the pricing or other materials terms of our arrangements with them.

Motorola, like many electronics manufacturers, has also experienced supply shortages and price increases in the past driven by raw material availability, manufacturing capacity, labor shortages, industry allocations, natural

disasters and significant changes in the financial or business condition of its suppliers. Workaround plans to address shortages have entailed in the past, and could entail in the future, increased freight costs for expedited shipments. We cannot assure you that we will not experience shortages or other supply chain disruptions in the future or that they will not negatively impact our operations. In addition, some of the components we use in our Motorola products are available only from a single source or limited sources, and we cannot assure you that we would be able to find replacement vendors on favorable terms or at all in the event of a supply chain disruption.

Additionally, because many of our supply contracts have volume-based pricing or minimum purchase requirements, if the volume of our Motorola sales decreases or does not reach projected targets, we could face increased materials and manufacturingincur costs or other financial liabilities that could makerequire us to change our Motorola products more costly per unit to manufacture and therefore less competitive and negatively impact our financial results. Further, certain of our competitors may negotiate more favorable contractual terms based on volume and other commitments that may provide them with competitive advantages and may impact our supply.

We also require our suppliers and business partners to comply with law and company policies regarding workplace and employment practices environmental compliance and intellectual property licensing, but we do not control them or their practices. If any of them violates laws or implements practices regarded as unethical, we could experience supply chain disruptions, canceled orders, terminations of or damage to key relationships, and damagein a manner adverse to our reputation. If any of them fails to procure necessary license rights to third-party intellectual property, legal action could ensue that could impact the salability of our products and expose us to financial obligations to third parties.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act included disclosure requirements regarding the use of “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries (DRC) and procedures regarding a manufacturer’s efforts to prevent the sourcing of such “conflict” minerals. SEC rules implementing these requirements may have the effect of reducing the pool of suppliers who can supply DRC “conflict free” components and parts, and we may not be able to obtain DRC conflict free products or supplies in sufficient quantities for our operations. Also, since our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our customers, stockholders and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for the conflict minerals used in our products.

business.

If our security measures are breached, or if our services are subject to attacks that degrade or deny the ability of users to access our products and services, our products and services may be perceived as not being secure, users and customers may curtail or stop using our products and services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure.

Our products and services involve the storage and transmission of users’ and customers’ proprietary information, and security breaches expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation, and potential liability. We experience cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis, and as a result, unauthorized parties have obtained, and may in the future obtain, access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data.basis. Our security measures may also be breached due to employee error, malfeasance, system errors or vulnerabilities, or otherwise. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users, or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our

11

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

data or our users’ or customers’ data. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in the security of our products and services that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose users and customers.

Web spam and content farms could decrease our search quality, which could damage our reputation and deter our current and potential users from using our products and services.

“Web spam” refers to websites that attempt to violate a search engine’s quality guidelines or that otherwise seek to rank higher in search results than a search engine’s assessment of their relevance and utility would rank them. Although English-language web spam in our search results has been significantly reduced, and web spam in most other languages is limited, we expect web spammers will continue to seek ways to improve their rankings inappropriately. We continuously combat web spam, including through indexing technology that makes it harder for spam-like, less useful web content to rank highly.

We face challengesa number of manufacturing and supply chain risks that, if not properly managed, could adversely impact our financial results and prospects.
We face a number of risks related to manufacturing and supply chain management. For instance, the products we sell may have quality issues resulting from low-quality and irrelevant content websites, including “content farms,” which are websites that generate large quantitiesthe design or manufacture of low-quality content to help them improve their search rankings. We are continually launching algorithmic changes focused on low-quality websites. If web spam and content farms continue to increase on Google, this could hurt our reputation for delivering relevant informationthe product, or reduce user traffic to our websites. In addition, as we continue to take actions to improve our search quality and reduce low-quality content, this mayfrom the software used in the short run reduce our AdSense revenues, since some ofproduct. Sometimes, these websites are AdSense partners.

Interruptionissues may be caused by components we purchase from other manufacturers or failure of our information technology and communications systems could hurt our ability to effectively provide our products and services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.

The availabilitysuppliers. If the quality of our products does not meet our customers' expectations or our products are found to be defective, then our sales and services dependsoperating earnings, and ultimately our reputation, could be negatively impacted.

We rely on the continuing operationthird parties to manufacture many of our information technologyassemblies and communications systems.finished products, and we have third-party arrangements for the design of some components and parts. Our systemsbusiness could be negatively affected if we are vulnerablenot able to damageengage third parties with the necessary capabilities or interruption from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, computer denial of service attacks,capacity on reasonable terms, or if those we engage fail to meet their obligations (whether due to financial difficulties or other attempts to harm our systems. Somereasons), or make adverse changes in the pricing or other material terms of our data centers are locatedarrangements with them.
We have in areas with a high risk of major earthquakes. Our data centers are also subject to break-ins, sabotage,the past, and intentional acts of vandalism,may experience in the future, supply shortages and to potential disruptions ifprice increases driven by raw material availability, manufacturing capacity, labor shortages, industry allocations, natural disasters and significant changes in the operators of these facilities have financial difficulties. Someor business condition of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning cannot accountsuppliers. Workaround plans to address shortages could entail increased freight costs for all eventualities. The occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision to close a facility we are using without adequate notice for financial reasons,expedited shipments. We may experience shortages or other unanticipated problems atsupply chain disruptions in the future that could negatively impact our data centers could result in lengthy interruptions in our service.operations. In addition, our products and services are highly technical and complex and may contain errors or vulnerabilities. Any errors or vulnerabilitiessome of the components we use in our products are available only from a single source or limited sources, and services,we may not be able to find replacement vendors on favorable terms or damage to or failureat all in the event of a supply chain disruption.
Additionally, because many of our systems,supply contracts have volume-based pricing or minimum purchase requirements, if the volume of our hardware sales decreases or does not reach projected targets, we could result in interruptions in our services, which could reduce our revenuesface increased materials and profits, and damage our brand.

Our international operations expose us to additional risksmanufacturing costs or other financial liabilities that could harmmake our business, operating results,hardware products more costly per unit to manufacture and therefore less competitive and negatively impact our financial condition.

Our international operations are significant to our revenues and net income, and we plan to further expand internationally. International revenues accounted for approximately 53%results. Further, certain of our consolidated revenues in 2012,competitors may negotiate more favorable contractual terms based on volume and more than half of our user traffic has been coming from outside the U.S. In certain international markets, we have limited operating experienceother commitments that may provide them with competitive advantages and may not benefit from any first-to-market advantages or otherwise succeed.

Our Motorola businessimpact our supply.

We also has facilities outside the U.S., and nearly all ofrequire our Motorola products (other than some prototypes) are manufactured outside the U.S., primarily in China, Taiwan and Brazil. If our manufacturing in these countries is disrupted, our overall capacity could be reduced and sales or profitability could be negatively impacted. We require these suppliers and business partners to comply with law and company policies regarding workplace and employment practices, data security, environmental compliance and intellectual property licensing, but we do not control them or their practices. If any of them violates laws or implements practices regarded as unethical, we could experience supply chain disruptions, canceled orders, terminations of or damage to key relationships, and damage to our reputation. If any of them fails to procure necessary license rights to third-party intellectual property, legal action could ensue that could impact the salabilitysaleability of our products and expose us to financial obligations to third parties.

Moreover,

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act includes disclosure requirements regarding the use of certain minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries (DRC) and procedures pertaining to a manufacturer's efforts regarding the source of such minerals. SEC rules implementing these requirements may have the effect of reducing the pool of suppliers who can supply DRC “conflict free” components and parts, and we may not be able to obtain DRC conflict free products or supplies in connectionsufficient quantities for our operations. Since our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our operationscustomers, stockholders and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for the minerals used in Brazil,our products.
Web spam and content farms could decrease our search quality, which could damage our reputation and deter our current and potential users from using our products and services.
“Web spam” refers to websites that attempt to violate a search engine's quality guidelines or that otherwise seek to rank higher in search results than a search engine's assessment of their relevance and utility would rank them.
Although English-language web spam in our search results has been significantly reduced, and web spam in most other languages is limited, we have had andexpect web spammers will continue to seek ways to improve their rankings inappropriately. We continuously combat web spam, including through indexing technology that makes it harder for spam-like, less useful web content to rank highly. We face challenges from low-quality and irrelevant content websites, including “content farms”, which are websites that generate large quantities of low-quality content to help them improve

12

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

their search rankings. We are continually launching algorithmic changes focused on low-quality websites. If our search results display an increasing number of web spam and content farms, this could hurt our reputation for delivering relevant information or reduce user traffic to our websites. In addition, as we continue to take actions to improve our search quality and reduce low-quality content, this may in the short run reduce our AdSense revenues, since some of these websites are AdSense partners.
Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could hurt our ability to effectively provide our products and services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.
The availability of our products and services depends on the continuing operation of our information technology and communications systems. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, the effects of climate change (such as sea level rise, drought, flooding, wildfires, and increased storm severity), power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, computer denial of service attacks, or other attempts to harm our systems. Some of our data centers are located in areas with a high risk of major earthquakes. Our data centers are also subject to break-ins, sabotage, and intentional acts of vandalism, and to potential disruptions if the operators of certain of these facilities have legal disputesfinancial difficulties. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and controversies, including tax, laborour disaster recovery planning cannot account for all eventualities. The occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision to close a facility we are using, or other unanticipated problems at our data centers could result in lengthy interruptions in our service. In addition, our products and trade compliance controversiesservices are highly technical and other legal matterscomplex and may contain errors or vulnerabilities, which could result in interruptions in our services or the failure of our systems.
Our international operations expose us to additional risks that take many

yearscould harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our international operations are significant to resolve. We incur legalour revenues and other costs in managingnet income, and defending these matters and expectwe plan to continue to incur such costs. Based ongrow internationally. International revenues accounted for approximately 54% of our assessment of these matters,consolidated revenues in 2015. In certain international markets, we have recorded reserves on only a small portion of the total potential exposure. It is, however, very difficult to predict the outcome of legal disputeslimited operating experience and controversies, including litigation, in Brazil and our ultimate exposure may be greater than our current assessments and related reserves.

not benefit from any first-to-market advantages or otherwise succeed.

In addition to risks described elsewhere in this section, our international operations expose us to other risks, including the following:

Changes in local political, economic, regulatory, tax, social, and labor conditions, which may adversely harm our business.

Restrictions on foreign ownership and investments, and stringent foreign exchange controls that might prevent us from repatriating cash earned in countries outside the U.S.

Import and export requirements, tariffs, trade disputes and barriers, and customs classifications that may prevent us from offering products or providing services to a particular market and may increase our operating costs.

Potential injunctions from importation into the U.S. of our Motorola products manufactured outside the U.S. in an ITC matter.

Longer payment cycles in some countries, increased credit risk, and higher levels of payment fraud.

Still developing foreign laws and legal systems.

Uncertainty regarding liability for services and content, including uncertainty as a result of local laws and lack of legal precedent.

Different employee/employer relationships, existence of workers’workers' councils and labor unions, and other challenges caused by distance, language, and cultural differences, making it harder to do business in certain jurisdictions.

Natural disasters, military or political conflicts, including war and other hostilities, and public health issues and outbreaks.

In addition, compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include internal control and disclosure rules, data privacy and filteringdata protection requirements, anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, and antitrust and competition regulations, among others. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our brand, our international expansiongrowth efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business, and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies.


13

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Finally, since we conduct business in currencies other than U.S. dollars but report our financial results in U.S. dollars, we face exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Although we hedge a portion of our international currency exposure, significant fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies may adversely affect our net income.revenues and earnings. Additionally, hedging programs are inherently risky and could expose us to additional risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our operating results may fluctuate, which makes our results difficult to predict and could cause our results to fall short of expectations.

Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many outside of our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely

on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our quarterly, year-to-date, and annual expenses as a percentage of our revenues may differ significantly from our historical or projected rates. Our operating results in future quarters may fall below expectations. Any of these events could cause our stock price to fall. Each of the risk factors listed in this section in addition to the following factors may affect our operating results:

Our ability to continue to attract users to our websites and satisfyretain existing users on our websites.

Our ability to monetize (or generate revenues from) traffic on ourGoogle websites and our Google Network Members’ websites.

Our ability to attract advertisers to our AdWords program,Members' websites both on desktop and our ability to attract websites to our AdSense program.

mobile devices.

The mix in our revenues between those generated on our websites and those generated through our Google Network and other factors, such asRevenue fluctuations caused by changes in productproperty mix, including a significant increase in mobile search queriesplatform mix, and a deceleration in the growth of desktop queries if monetization stays at current levels, and the geographic mix of our revenues that can affect revenue growth rates and margins.

geographical mix.

The amount of revenues and expenses generated and incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars, and our ability to manage the resulting risk through our foreign exchange risk management program.

The amount and timing of operating costs and expenses and capital expenditures related to the maintenance and expansion of our businesses, operations, and infrastructure.

Our focus on long-term goals over short-term results.

The results of our acquisitions and our investments in risky projects, including new business strategies and newbusinesses, products, services, technologies and acquisitions.

technologies.

Our ability to keep our websites operational at a reasonable cost and without service interruptions.

Our ability to generate significant revenues from new products and services in which we have invested considerable time and resources, such as Google Wallet.

resources.

Because our business is changing and evolving, our historical operating results may not be useful to you in predicting our future operating results. In addition, advertising spending has historically been cyclical in nature, reflecting overall economic conditions, as well as budgeting and buying patterns. Also, user traffic tends to be seasonal. Our rapid growth has tended to mask the cyclicality and seasonality of our business. As our growth rate has slowed, the cyclicality and seasonality in our business has become more pronounced and caused our operating results to fluctuate.

If we were to lose the services of Larry, Sergey, Eric, Sundar, or other key personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.

Our future success depends in a large part upon the continued service of key members of our senior management team. In particular, Larry Page and Sergey Brin are critical to the overall management of Alphabet and its subsidiaries, and they, along with Sundar Pichai, the Chief Executive Officer of Google, andplay an important role in the development of our technology. Along with our Executive Chairman Eric E. Schmidt, they also play a key role in maintaining our culture and setting our strategic direction. All of our executive officers and key employees are at-will employees, and we do not maintain any key-person life insurance policies. The loss of key personnel could seriously harm our business.

We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel, or maintain our corporate culture, we may not be able to grow effectively.

Our performance largely depends on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense, and certain of our competitors have directly targeted our employees. In addition, our compensation arrangements, such as our equity award

programs, may not always be successful in attracting new employees and retaining and motivating our existing employees. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees.


14

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

In addition, we believe that our corporate culture fosters innovation, creativity, and teamwork. As our organization grows, and we are required to implement more complex organizational management structures, particularly in light of our holding company reorganization and new operating structure, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. This could negatively impact our future success.

Our business depends on continued and unimpeded access to the internetInternet by us and our users. Internet access providers may be able to restrict, block, degrade, or charge for access to certain of our products and services, which could lead to additional expenses and the loss of users and advertisers.

Our products and services depend on the ability of our users to access the internet,Internet, and certain of our products require significant bandwidth to work effectively. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have significant market power in the broadband and internet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies, and government-owned service providers. Some of these providers have taken, or have stated that they may take measures, including legal actions, that could degrade, disrupt, or increase the cost of user access to certain of our products by restricting or prohibiting the use of their infrastructure to support or facilitate our offerings, or by charging increased fees to us or our users to provide our offerings. In addition, in some jurisdictions, our products and services have been subject to government-initiated restrictions or blockages. Such interference could result in a loss of existing users and advertisers, and increased costs, and could impair our ability to attract new users and advertisers, thereby harming our revenues and growth.

New technologies could block ouronline ads, which would harm our Google business.

Technologies have been developed (including by us) that can block the display of our ads and that provide tools to users to opt out of our advertising products. Most of our Google revenues are derived from fees paid to us by advertisers in connection with the display of ads on web pages for our users. As a result, such technologies and tools could adversely affect our operating results.

We are exposed to fluctuations in the market values of our investment portfolio.

investments.

Given the global nature of our business, we have investments both domestically and internationally. Credit ratings and pricingmarket values of these investments can be negatively impacted by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, financial results, foreign exchange rates, or other factors. As a result, the value or liquidity of our cash equivalents and marketable securities could decline and result in a material impairment, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities.

Our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, the net gains and losses recognized by legal entities on certain hedges and related hedged intercompany and other transactions under our foreign exchange risk management program, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets andor liabilities, as a result of gains on our foreign exchange risk management program, or changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles, as well as certain discrete items. We are subject to regular review and audit by both domestic and foreign tax authorities. As a result, we have received, and may in the future receive, assessments in multiple jurisdictions on various tax-related assertions, including transfer pricing adjustments or permanent establishment. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our operating results and financial condition. In addition, the determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment, and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Stock

The trading price for our Class A common stock may continue to be volatile, and if the shares of the new class of non-voting Class C capital stock are distributed as expected, the trading price of that class may alsocontinue to be volatile and may affect the trading price for the Class A common stock.

volatile.

The trading price of our Class A common stock has at times experienced substantial price volatility and may continue to be volatile. For example, from January 1, 20122015 through December 31, 2012,2015, the closing price of our Class A common stock ranged from $559.05$497.06 per share to $768.05$793.96 per share, and the closing price of our Class C capital stock ranged from $492.55 to $776.60 per share.
The trading price of our Class A common stock and Class C capital stock may fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others:

Quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors.


15

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial relationships, or capital commitments.

Recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates.

Announcements about our earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations, the risk of which is enhanced because it is our policy not to give guidance on earnings.

Announcements by our competitors of their earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations.

Commentary by industry and market professionals about our products, strategies, and other matters affecting our business and results, regardless of its accuracy.

The volume of shares of Class A common stock and Class C capital stock available for public sale.

Sales of Class A common stock and Class C capital stock by us or by our stockholders (including sales by our directors, executive officers, and other employees).

Short sales, hedging, and other derivative transactions on shares of our Class A common stock (including derivative transactions under our Transferable Stock Option program).

In addition, we have announced the intention of our board of directors to consider a distribution of shares of our non-votingand Class C capital stock as a dividend to our holdersstock.

The perceived values of Class A and Class B common stock, pending resolution of litigation involving the authorization of that class.

Although we plan to list the Class C capital stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, a liquid trading market will develop for the Class C capital stock. If it does not or if the Class C capital stock is not attractive to targets as an acquisition currency or to our employees as an incentive, we may not achieve our objectives in creating this new class. As in the case of the Class A common stock, the trading price for the Class C capital stock may also be volatile and affected by the factors noted above, as well as by the difference in voting rights as between the Class A common stock and the Class C capital stock the volume of Class C capitalrelative to one another.

Our stock available for public sale and sales by us and our stockholders of Class C capital stock, including by institutional investors that may be unwilling, unable or choose not to hold non-voting shares they receive as part of the stock dividend, if it is declared and paid. Whether or not the Class C capital stock is included in stock indices in the future may also affect the trading prices of the Class A common stock and the Class C capital stock.

repurchase program.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may harm the market price of our Class A common stock and if issued, our Class C capital Stock,stock regardless of our actual operating performance.

We cannot guarantee that our recently announced stock repurchase program will be fully consummated or that our stock repurchase program will enhance long-term stockholder value, and stock repurchases could increase the volatility of the price of our stock and could diminish our cash reserves.
In October 2015, our board of directors authorized our company to repurchase up to $5,099,019,513.59 of our Class C capital stock and in January 2016, our board of directors authorized our Company to repurchase an additional amount of approximately 514 thousand shares. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Although our board of directors has authorized a stock repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate Alphabet to repurchase any specific dollar amount or to acquire any specific number of shares. The stock repurchase program could affect the price of our stock and increase volatility and may be suspended or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in the trading price of our stock.
The concentration of our stock ownership limits our stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters.

Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share.share, and our Class C capital stock has no voting rights. As of December 31, 2012,2015, Larry, Sergey, and Eric beneficially owned approximately 92%92.5% of our outstanding Class B

common stock, representingwhich represented approximately 65%58.5% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Larry, Sergey, and Eric therefore have significant influence over management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets, for the foreseeable future. In addition, because our Class C capital stock carries no voting rights (except as required by applicable law), the issuance of the Class C capital stock, including in future stock-based acquisition transactions and to fund employee equity incentive programs, could prolong the duration of Larry and Sergey’s current relative ownership of our voting power and their ability to elect all of our directors and to determine the outcome of most matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Together with Eric, they would also continue to be able to control any required stockholder vote with respect to certain change in control transactions involving GoogleAlphabet (including an acquisition of GoogleAlphabet by another company).

This concentrated control limits or severely restricts our stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our stockholders do not view as beneficial. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock and if issued, our Class C capital stock could be adversely affected.

Provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable.

Provisions in ourAlphabet’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include the following:


16

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for a dual class commontri-class capital stock structure. As a result of this structure, Larry, Sergey, and Eric have significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets. This concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover, or other change of control transaction that other stockholders may view as beneficial. As noted above, the issuance of the Class C capital stock could have the effect of prolonging the influence of Larry, Sergey, and Eric.

Our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors.

Our stockholders may not act by written consent. As a result, a holder, or holders, controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be able to take certain actions without holding a stockholders’stockholders' meeting.

Our certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative voting in the election of directors. This limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates.

Stockholders must provide advance notice to nominate individuals for election to the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors or to propose matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting. These provisions may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’sacquirer's own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company.

Our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to certain Delaware anti-takeover provisions. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its outstanding voting stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has approved the transaction. Our board of directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of us.

Risks Related to Our Holding Company Reorganization
As a holding company, Alphabet will be dependent on the operations and funds of its subsidiaries.
On October 2, 2015, we completed a reorganization pursuant to which Alphabet became a holding company with no business operations of its own. Alphabet’s only significant assets are the outstanding equity interests in Google and any other future subsidiaries of Alphabet. As a result, we rely on cash flows from subsidiaries to meet our obligations, including to service any debt obligations of Alphabet.
We may not obtain the anticipated benefits of our reorganization into a holding company structure.
We believe that our holding company reorganization and a new operating structure will increase management scale and allow us to focus on running our diverse businesses independently with the goal of maximizing each of the business’ potential. The anticipated benefits of this reorganization may not be obtained if circumstances prevent us from taking advantage of the strategic and business opportunities that we expect it may afford us. As a result, we may incur the costs of a holding company structure without realizing the anticipated benefits, which could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
Alphabet’s management is dedicating significant effort to the new operating structure. These efforts may divert management’s focus and resources from Alphabet’s business, corporate initiatives, or strategic opportunities, which could have an adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, financial condition, or prospects. Additionally, our subsidiaries may be restricted in their ability to pay cash dividends or to make other distributions to Alphabet, as the new holding company.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

There are no unresolved staff comments at December 31, 2015.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

Our headquarters are located in Mountain View, California, where we own approximately 3.54.8 million square feet of office and building space and approximately sevenfifteen acres of developable land to accommodate anticipated future growth. We alsoIn addition, we own a 2.3 million square feet office building in New York, New York and 665,000 square feet oflease office and building space, research and development, and sales and support offices primarily in Paris, FranceNorth America, Europe, South America, and Dublin, Ireland.Asia. We also operate and own data centers in the U.S.,

17

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Europe, South America, and Asia pursuant to various lease agreements and co-location arrangements.

In addition, we lease approximately 3.8 million square feet of office space and approximately 61 acres of undeveloped land in and near our headquarters in Mountain View, California. We also lease additional research and development, and sales and support offices throughout the United States and maintain leased facilities internationally in countries around the world. Larger leased sites include properties located in Dublin, Ireland; Zurich, Switzerland; London, UK; Hyderabad, India; San Francisco, CA; San Bruno, CA; Paris, France; Hamburg, Germany; Tel Aviv, Israel; Sao Paulo, Brazil; Ann Arbor, MI; Bothell, WA; Cambridge, MA; Chicago, IL; Kirkland, WA; Venice, CA; Pittsburgh, PA; Seattle, WA; Sydney, Australia; Beijing, China; Shanghai, China; Bangalore, India; Gurgaon, India; Tokyo, Japan; and Singapore.

Motorola also operates manufacturing facilities, research and development, administrative and sales offices in various U.S. locations and in many foreign countries. Motorola owns eight facilities (manufacturing, sales, service and offices), five of which are located in the Americas Region (U.S., Canada, Mexico, Central America and South America) and three of which are located in other countries. As of December 31, 2012, Motorola leased 97 facilities, 31 of which are located in the Americas Region and 66 of which are located in other countries. Motorola Mobility owns three major facilities for the manufacturing and distribution of its products. These facilities are located in Tianjin, China; Hsin Tien, Taiwan; and Jaguariuna, Brazil. As previously reported, Motorola is executing a significant consolidation of its portfolio, which will reduce the number of facilities worldwide, including manufacturing, sales and marketing, and research and development locations.

We believe our existing facilities, both owned and leased, are in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business. Motorola generally considers the productive capacity of the plants operated by each of its business segments to be adequate and sufficient for the requirements of each business group. The extent of utilization of such manufacturing facilities varies from plant to plant and from time to time during the year.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of our material pending legal proceedings, please see Note 11 “Commitments and Contingencies—Contingencies - Legal Matters” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

During the fourth quarter of 2015, Alphabet Inc. became the successor issuer of Google Inc. pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act as of October 2, 2015.
Price Range of Common Stock and Capital Stock
Our Class A common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “GOOG” since August 19, 2004.2004 and under the symbol "GOOGL" since April 3, 2014. Prior to that time,August 19, 2004, there was no public market for our stock. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices per share for our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

Fiscal Year 2012 Quarters Ended:

  High   Low 

March 31, 2012

  $670.25    $564.55  

June 30, 2012

   653.14     556.52  

September 30, 2012

   764.89     562.09  

December 31, 2012

   774.38     636.00  

Fiscal Year 2011 Quarters Ended:

  High   Low 

March 31, 2011

  $642.96    $551.28  

June 30, 2011

   595.19     473.02  

September 30, 2011

   627.50     490.86  

December 31, 2011

   646.76     480.60  

Fiscal Year 2015 Quarters Ended:High Low
March 31, 2015$581.44
 $497.06
June 30, 2015573.66
 532.74
September 30, 2015699.62
 541.70
December 31, 2015793.96
 642.00
Fiscal Year 2014 Quarters Ended:High Low
March 31, 2014$610.70
 $551.17
June 30, 2014585.93
 518.00
September 30, 2014605.40
 571.81
December 31, 2014587.78
 498.16
Our Class B common stock is neither listed nor traded.

Our Class C capital stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “GOOG” since April 3, 2014. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our Class C capital stock. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices per share for our Class C capital stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Fiscal Year 2015 Quarters Ended:High Low
March 31, 2015$575.33
 $492.55
June 30, 2015565.06
 520.51
September 30, 2015672.93
 516.83
December 31, 2015776.60
 611.29
Fiscal Year 2014 Quarters Ended:High Low
March 31, 2014$
 $
June 30, 2014578.65
 509.96
September 30, 2014596.08
 562.73
December 31, 2014577.35
 495.39

18

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Holders of Record

As of December 31, 2012,2015, there were approximately, 2,6892,279 and 2,173 stockholders of record of our Class A common stock and Class C capital stock, respectively, and the closing priceprices of our Class A common stock was $707.38and Class C capital stock were $778.01 and $758.88 per share, respectively, as reported by the NasdaqNASDAQ Global Select Market. Because many of our shares of Class A common stock and Class C capital stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders. As of December 31, 2012,2015, there were approximately 7968 stockholders of record of our Class B common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our common or capital stock. We intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Stock Performance Graph

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes

Issuer Purchases of Section 18Equity Securities
The following table presents information with respect to Alphabet's repurchases of Class C capital stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.
Period 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
(in thousands) (1)
 
Average Price Paid per Share (2)
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs
(in thousands) (1)
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program
(in millions)
October 1 - 31 0
 $0.00
 0
 $5,099
November 1 - 30 1,500
 $737.72
 1,500
 $3,934
December 1 - 31 891
 $757.04
 891
 $3,319
Total 2,391
 $744.68
 2,391
  
(1)
In October 2015, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to repurchase up to $5,099,019,513.59 of its Class C capital stock, commencing in the fourth quarter of 2015. The repurchases are being executed from time to time, subject to general business and market conditions and other investment opportunities, through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through the use of 10b5-1 plans. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Refer to Note 13 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to share repurchases.
(2)
Average price paid per share includes costs associated with the repurchases.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On December 17, 2015, we issued an aggregate of approximately 514 thousand shares of our Class C capital stock in connection with our acquisition of bebop Technologies, Inc. The issuance of our shares was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporatedprovided by reference into any filing of Google under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Regulation D. 

Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the 5-year cumulative total return to shareholders on GoogleAlphabet Inc.’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index, the RDG Internet Composite index, and the NASDAQ Composite index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in the company’s Class A common stock, Class C capital stock, and in each index on December 31, 20072010 and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2012.2015. The returns shown are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.


19

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among GoogleAlphabet Inc., the S&P 500 Index, the

NASDAQ Composite Index, and the RDG Internet Composite Index

*$100 invested on December 31, 20072010 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright© 2013 2015 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

Results

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Google’s Transferable Stock Option (TSO) Program

Under our TSO program, eligible employees are able to sell vested stock options to participating financial institutionsSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference into any filing of Alphabet under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in an online auction as an alternative to exercising options in the traditional method and then selling the underlying shares. The following table provides information with respect to sales by our employees of TSOs during the three months ended December 31, 2012:

   Aggregate Amounts   Weighted-Average Per Share
Amounts
 

Period(1)

  Number of Shares
Underlying
TSOs Sold
   Sale
Price of
TSOs Sold
   TSO
Premium(2)
   Exercise
Price of
TSOs Sold
   Sale
Price of
TSOs Sold
   TSO
Premium(2)
 
       (in thousands)             

October 1 – 31

   49,772    $15,307    $514    $381.19    $307.55    $10.34  

November 1 – 30

   190,351     66,001     1,153     338.77     346.73     6.06  

December 1 – 31

   0     0     0     0     0     0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

Total (except weighted-average per share amounts)

   240,123    $81,308    $1,667    $347.56    $338.61    $6.95  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

(1)

The TSO program is generally active during regular trading hours for the Nasdaq Global Select Market when our trading window is open. However, we have the right to suspend the TSO program at any time for any reason, including for maintenance and other technical reasons.

(2)

TSO premium is calculated as the difference between (a) the sale price of the TSO and (b) the intrinsic value of the TSO, which we define as the excess, if any, of the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the sale over the exercise price of the TSO.

Our TSO program allows participation by executive officers (other than Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Eric E. Schmidt). The following table provides information with respect to sales by our executive officers of TSOs during the three months ended December 31, 2012:

   Aggregate Amounts 

Executive Officer

  Number of Shares
Underlying
TSOs Sold
   Sale
Price of
TSOs Sold
   TSO
Premium
 
       (in thousands) 

Nikesh Arora

   2,843    $999    $3  

Patrick Pichette

   9,291    $2,441    $177  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   12,134    $3,440    $180  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

such filing.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The consolidated statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012 and the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2011, and 2012 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future period.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012 
   (in millions, except per share amounts) 

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:

          

Revenues

  $21,796    $23,651    $29,321    $37,905    $50,175  

Income from operations

   6,632     8,312     10,381     11,742     12,760  

Net income from continuing operations

   4,227     6,520     8,505     9,737     10,788  

Net loss from discontinued operations

   0     0     0     0     (51

Net income

   4,227     6,520     8,505     9,737     10,737  

Net income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock—basic

          

Continuing operations

  $13.46    $20.62    $26.69    $30.17    $32.97  

Discontinued operations

   0     0     0     0    $(0.16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock—basic

  $13.46    $20.62    $26.69    $30.17    $32.81  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock—diluted

          

Continuing operations

  $13.31    $20.41    $26.31    $29.76    $32.46  

Discontinued operations

   0     0     0     0    $(0.15
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock—diluted

  $13.31    $20.41    $26.31    $29.76    $32.31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 
   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012 
   (in millions) 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

          

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities

  $15,846    $24,485    $34,975    $44,626    $48,088  

Total assets

   31,768     40,497     57,851     72,574     93,798  

Total long-term liabilities

   1,227     1,746     1,614     5,516     7,746  

Total stockholders’ equity

   28,239     36,004     46,241     58,145     71,715  


20

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The consolidated statements of income data of Alphabet and Google were as follows for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 
2011(1)
 
2012(1)
 
2013(1)
 
2014(1)
 2015
 (in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:         
Revenues$37,905
 $46,039
 $55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
Income from operations11,742
 13,834
 15,403
 16,496
 19,360
Net income from continuing operations9,706
 11,435
 13,160
 13,620
 16,348
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations0
 (816) (427) 516
 0
Net income9,706
 10,619
 12,733
 14,136
 16,348
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The basic and diluted income per share data as included on the consolidated statements of income of Alphabet were as follows for the periods presented (not required for Google pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a)):
 Year Ended December 31,
 
2011(1)
 
2012(1)
 
2013(1)
 
2014(1)
 2015
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:         
Continuing operations$15.04
 $17.47
 $19.77
 $20.15
 $23.11
Discontinued operations0.00
 (1.25) (0.64) 0.76
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class A and B common stock$15.04
 $16.22
 $19.13
 $20.91
 $23.11
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:         
Continuing operations$15.04
 $17.47
 $19.77
 $20.15
 $24.63
Discontinued operations0.00
 (1.25) (0.64) 0.76
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class C capital stock$15.04
 $16.22
 $19.13
 $20.91
 $24.63
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:         
Continuing operations$14.83
 $17.21
 $19.42
 $19.82
 $22.84
Discontinued operations0.00
 (1.23) (0.63) 0.75
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class A and B common stock$14.83
 $15.98
 $18.79
 $20.57
 $22.84
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:         
Continuing operations$14.83
 $17.21
 $19.42
 $19.82
 $24.34
Discontinued operations0.00
 (1.23) (0.63) 0.75
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class C capital stock$14.83
 $15.98
 $18.79
 $20.57
 $24.34
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

21

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The consolidated balance sheets of Alphabet and Google were as follows for the periods presented:
 As of December 31,
 
2011(1)(2)
 
2012(1)(2)
 
2013(1)(2)
 
2014(1)(2)
 2015
 (in millions)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities$44,626
 $48,088
 $58,717
 $64,395
 $73,066
Total assets72,359
 92,711
 109,050
 129,187
 147,461
Total long-term liabilities5,294
 6,662
 6,165
 8,548
 7,820
Total stockholders’ equity58,118
 71,570
 86,977
 103,860
 120,331
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)
Includes reclassifications of deferred tax assets and liabilities related to ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” Please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The

Please read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Google is a global technology leader focused on improving the ways people connect with information. We aspire to build products and provide services that improve the lives of billions of people globally. Our mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. Our innovations in web search and advertising have made our website a top internet property and our brand one of the most recognized in the world.

Our Motorola business is comprised of two operating segments. The Mobile segment is focused on mobile wireless devices and related products and services. The Home segment is focused on technologies and devices that provide video entertainment services to consumers by enabling subscribers to access a variety of interactive digital television services.

We generate revenue primarily by delivering relevant, cost-effective online advertising. Businesses use our AdWords program to promote their products and services with targeted advertising. In addition, the third parties that comprise the Google Network use our AdSense program to deliver relevant ads that generate revenues and enhance the user experience. We also generate revenues from Motorola by selling hardware products.

In December 2012, we entered into an agreement with Arris and certain other persons providing for the disposition of our Motorola Home segment. The transaction is expected to close in 2013.

Trends in Our Businesses

Advertising transactionsBusiness

The following trends have contributed to the results of our consolidated operations, and we anticipate that they will continue to impact our future results:
Users' behaviors and advertising continue to shift from offline to online as the digital economy evolves. This
The continuing shift from an offline to online world has contributed to the rapid growth of our business since inception, resulting in substantially increasedincreasing revenues, and we expect that our businessthis online shift will continue to grow. However,benefit our business.
As online advertising evolves, we continue to expand our product offerings which may impact our monetization.
As interactions between users and advertisers change, we continue to expand our product offerings to serve their changing needs. Over time, we expect our monetization trends to fluctuate. For example, we have seen an increase in YouTube engagement ads, which monetize at a lower rate than traditional search desktop ads. Additionally, advertisers are beginning to shift to programmatic buying which presents opportunities for advertisers to connect with the right user, in the right moment, in the right context. This may also have different monetization profiles to our existing advertising business. These trends will continue to affect our monetization in the future.
Users are increasingly using multiple devices to access our products and services, and our advertising revenues are increasingly coming from mobile phones and other new formats.
Our users are accessing the Internet via multiple devices. Mobile computing power continues to grow and users want to feel connected no matter where they are or what they are doing. We seek to expand our products and services to stay in front of this shift in order to maintain and grow our business.
In this multi-device world, we generate our advertising revenues increasingly from mobile phones and newer advertising formats, and the margins from the advertising revenues from these sources have generally been lower than those from desktop computers and tablets. Our traffic acquisition cost (TAC) may also be impacted because the rates at which we share mobile revenues with our partners may differ from our traditional desktop and tablet formats. We expect both of these trends to continue to put pressure on our overall margins, particularly if we fail to realize the opportunities presented during the transition to a dynamic multi-screen environment.
As users in developing economies increasingly come online, we generate increasing revenues from international markets, and movements in foreign exchange rates impact such revenues.

22

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The shift to online, as well as the advent of the multi-device world, has brought opportunities outside of the U.S., especially in emerging markets, and we continue to develop localized versions of our products and relevant advertising programs useful to our users in these markets. This has led to a trend of increased revenues from international markets over time and we expect that our results will continue to be impacted by our performance in these markets, particularly as low-cost mobile devices become more available.
Our international revenues represent a significant proportion of our revenues and are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. While we have a foreign exchange risk management program designed to reduce our exposure to these fluctuations, this program does not fully offset their effect on our revenues and earnings.
The portion of our revenues that we derive from non-advertising revenues is increasing.
Non-advertising revenues have grown over time. We expect this trend to continue as we focus on expanding our Google offerings to our users through products like Google Play, cloud and apps and hardware products. Across these initiatives, we currently derive non-advertising revenues primarily from sales of digital content products, hardware sales, service and licensing fees; the margins on these non-advertising businesses vary significantly and may be lower than the margins on our advertising business. A number of our Other Bets initiatives are in their initial development stages, and as such, the sources of revenues from these businesses could change over time and the revenues themselves could be volatile.
As we continue to look for new ways to serve our users and expand our businesses, we will invest heavily in R&D and our capital expenditures will continue to fluctuate.
We continue to make significant research and development (R&D) investments in areas of strategic focus for Google, such as search and advertising, as well as in new products and services across both Google and Other Bets. The amount of our capital expenditures has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate in the long term as we invest heavily in our systems, data centers, real estate and facilities, and information technology infrastructure.
In addition, acquisitions remain an important part of our strategy and use of capital, and we expect to continue to spend cash on acquisitions and other investments. These acquisitions generally enhance the breadth and depth of our offerings, as well as expanding our expertise in engineering and other functional areas.
Our employees are critical to our success and we expect to continue investing in them.
Our employees are among our best assets and are critical for our continued success. Their energy and talent drive Alphabet and create our success. We expect to continue hiring talented employees and to provide competitive compensation programs to our employees. As of December 31, 2015, we had 61,814 full-time employees: 23,336 in research and development, 19,082 in sales and marketing, 10,944 in operations, and 8,452 in general and administrative, an increase of 8,214 total headcount from December 31, 2014.
Executive Overview of Results
Here are our key financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (consolidated unless otherwise noted):
Revenues of $75.0 billion and revenue growth of 14% year over year, constant currency revenue growth of 20% year over year.
Google segment revenues of $74.5 billion with revenue growth of 14% and Other Bets revenues of $0.4 billion.
Revenues from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Rest of World were $34.8 billion, $7.1 billion, and $33.1 billion, respectively.
Cost of revenues was $28.2 billion, consisting of traffic acquisition costs of $14.4 billion and other cost of revenues of $13.8 billion. Our traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues was 21%.
Operating expenses (excluding cost of revenues) were $27.5 billion.
Income from operations was $19.4 billion.
Effective tax rate of 17%.
Net income was $16.3 billion with diluted net income per share for Class A and B common stock of $22.84 and for Class C capital stock of $24.34.
Operating cash flow was $26.0 billion.
Capital expenditures were $9.9 billion.

23

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Headcount was 61,814 as of December 31, 2015.
Information about Segments
In conjunction with the Alphabet reorganization, in the fourth quarter of 2015, we implemented legal and operational changes in how our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) manages our businesses, including resource allocation and performance assessment. Consequently, we have multiple operating segments, representing the individual businesses that are run separately under the Alphabet structure.
Google is our only reportable segment. None of our other segments meet the quantitative thresholds to qualify as reportable segments; therefore, the operating segments are combined and disclosed below as Other Bets. All prior-period amounts have been adjusted retrospectively to reflect the reportable segment change.
Our reported segments are described below:
Google – Google includes our main internet products such as Search, Ads, Commerce, Maps, YouTube, Apps, Cloud, Android, Chrome, Google Play as well as hardware products we sell, such as Chromecast, Chromebooks and Nexus. Our technical infrastructure and newer efforts like Virtual Reality are also included in Google.
Other Bets – Other Bets is a combination of multiple operating segments that are not individually material. Other Bets includes businesses such as Access/Google Fiber, Calico, Nest, Verily, GV, Google Capital, X, and other initiatives.
Please refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results as a percentage of revenues for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
     2013(1)(2)
 
     2014(1)(2)
 2015
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:     
Revenues100.0 % 100.0% 100.0%
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of revenues39.6
 38.9
 37.6
Research and development12.9
 14.9
 16.3
Sales and marketing11.8
 12.3
 12.1
General and administrative8.0
 8.9
 8.2
Total costs and expenses72.3 % 75.0% 74.2%
Income from operations27.7
 25.0
 25.8
Other income (expense), net0.9
 1.1
 0.4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes28.6
 26.1
 26.2
Provision for income taxes4.9
 5.5
 4.4
Net income from continuing operations23.7
 20.6
 21.8
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations(0.8) 0.8
 0.0
Net income22.9 % 21.4% 21.8%
(1)
Financial results of Motorola Home were included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. Financial results of Motorola Mobile were included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014.
(2)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

24

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Consolidated Revenues
The following table presents our consolidated revenues, by segment and revenue source (in millions), for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google segment     
Google websites$37,422
 $45,085
 $52,357
Google Network Members' websites (1)
13,650
 14,539
 15,033
Google advertising revenues51,072
 59,624
 67,390
Google other revenues (1)
4,435
 6,050
 7,151
Google segment revenues$55,507
 $65,674
 $74,541
      
Other Bets     
Other Bets revenues$12
 $327
 $448
      
Consolidated revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
(1)
Prior period amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification primarily related to DoubleClick ad serving software revenues from Google other revenues to Advertising Revenues from Google Network Members' websites to conform with the current period presentation.
Google segment
The following table presents our Google segment revenues (in millions), those revenues expressed as a percentage of consolidated revenues, and changes in our aggregate paid clicks and cost-per-click (expressed as a percentage) for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google segment revenues$55,507
 $65,674
 $74,541
Google segment revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues100.0% 99.5 % 99.4 %
Aggregate paid clicks change  20 % 22 %
Aggregate cost-per-click change  (5)% (11)%
Use of Monetization Metrics
When assessing our advertising revenue performance, we present information regarding the number of "paid clicks" and "cost-per-click" for our Google websites and Google Network Members websites. Management views these as important metrics for understanding our business. We periodically review, refine and update our methodologies for monitoring, gathering, and counting the number of paid clicks and for identifying the revenues generated by click activity.
Paid clicks for our Google websites represent engagement by users and include clicks on advertisements by end-users related to searches on Google.com, clicks related to advertisements on other owned and operated properties including Gmail, Finance, Maps, and Google Play; and viewed YouTube engagement ads like TrueView (counted as an engagement when the user chooses not to skip the ad). Paid clicks for our Google Network Members' websites include clicks by end-users related to advertisements served on Google Network Members' properties participating in our AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content and AdMob businesses. In some cases, such as programmatic and reservation based advertising buying, we charge advertisers by impression; while growing, this represents a small part of our revenue base.
Cost-per-click is defined as click-driven revenue divided by our total number of paid clicks and represents the average cost of each engagement by users we charge advertisers.
The rate of change in revenue and revenue growth, as well as the rate of change in paid clicks and cost-per-click on Google websites and Google Network Members' websites and their correlation with the rate of change in revenues, has fluctuated and may fluctuate in the future because of various factors, including:

25

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

growth rates of our revenues from Google websites, including YouTube, compared to those of our revenues from Google Network Members' websites;
advertiser competition for keywords;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
seasonality;
the fees advertisers are willing to pay based on how they manage their advertising costs;
changes in advertising quality or formats;
traffic growth in emerging markets compared to more mature markets and across various advertising verticals and channels;
a shift in the proportion of non-click based revenue generated in Google websites and Google Network Members' websites, including an increase in programmatic and reservation based advertising buying; and
general economic conditions.
Our revenue growth rate has generally declined over time and it could do so in the future as a result of a number of factors, including increasing competition, our investments in new business strategies, products, services, and technologies, changes in our product mix, query growth rates, and how users make queries, challenges in maintaining our growth rate as our revenues increase to higher levels, and the evolution of the online advertising market, including the increasing variety of online platforms for advertising, and other marketsour investments in which we participate.

Mobile search queries and mobile commerce are growing dramatically around the world, and consumers are using multiple devices to access information. Over time these trends have resulted innew business strategies, changes in our product mix, including a significant increase in mobile search queries and a decelerationshifts in the growthgeographic mix of desktop queries.our revenues. We also expect that our revenue growth rate will continue to be affected by evolving consumeruser preferences, as well as by advertising trends, the acceptance by mobile users of our products and services andas they are delivered on diverse devices, our ability to create a seamless experience for both users and advertisers, and movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

Google websites
The following table presents our Google websites revenues (in millions), those revenues expressed as a multi-screen environment. In addition, if there is a further general economic downturn, this may result in fewer commercial queries by our userspercentage of Google segment revenues, and may cause advertisers to reduce the amount they spend on online advertising, including the amount they are willing to pay for each click or impression, which could negatively affect the growth rate of our revenues. We plan to continue to invest aggressivelychanges in our core areaspaid clicks and cost-per-click (expressed as a percentage) for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google websites$37,422
 $45,085
 $52,357
Google websites as a percentage of Google segment revenues67.4% 68.6 % 70.2 %
Paid clicks change  29 % 33 %
Cost-per-click change  (7)% (15)%
Google websites revenues consist primarily of:
AdWords revenue that is generated on Google.com. This includes revenue from traffic generated by search distribution partners who use Google.com as their default search in browsers, toolbars, etc.;
Advertising revenue generated on YouTube, including, but not limited to YouTube TrueView and Google Preferred; and
Advertising revenue generated from other Google owned and operated properties like Gmail, Finance, Maps, and Google Play.
Our Google websites revenues increased $7,272 million from 2014 to 2015 and also increased as a percentage of strategic focus.

Google segment revenues. Our Google websites revenue growth was primarily driven by increases in mobile search due to ongoing improvements in ad formats, as well as growth in YouTube video advertising across TrueView and Google Preferred, partially offset by the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.

The main focusnumber of paid clicks through our advertising programs isincreased from 2014 to provide relevant2015 due to an increase in aggregate traffic on Google owned properties, the adoption of advertising formats such as YouTube engagement ads, and useful advertising tocontinued global expansion of our users, reflectingproducts, advertisers and user base across all platforms, particularly mobile. The positive impact on our commitment to constantly improve their overall web experience. Asrevenues from paid clicks was partially offset by a result, we expect to continue to take steps to improvedecrease in the relevancecost-per-click paid by our advertisers. The decrease was primarily driven by continued growth in YouTube engagement ads where cost-per-click remains lower than on our other platforms, as well as changes in property and device mix, product mix, geographic mix, and ongoing product changes, and the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.
Our Google websites revenues increased $7,663 million from 2013 to 2014 and also increased as a percentage of Google segment revenues. Our Google websites revenue growth was driven primarily by growth across all platforms due to ongoing improvements in ad formats, as well as growth in YouTube engagement ads, displayedpartially offset by the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.

26

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The increase in the number of paid clicks generated through our advertising programs from 2013 to 2014 was due to certain monetization improvements including new and richer ad formats, an increase in aggregate traffic across all platforms, the continued global expansion of our products, advertisers, and user base, partially offset by certain advertising policy changes. The positive impact on our revenues from paid clicks was partially offset by a decrease in the average cost-per-click paid by our advertisers. The decrease was due to various factors, such as the geographic mix, device mix, property mix, ongoing product and policy changes, and the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.
Google Network Members' websites and
The following table presents our Google Network Members’ websites. These steps include not displaying ads that generate low click-through rates or that send users to irrelevant or otherwise low qualityMembers' websites updatingrevenues (in millions), those revenues expressed as a percentage of Google segment revenues, and changes in our advertising policiespaid clicks and ensuring their compliance, and terminating our relationships with those cost-per-click for the periods presented (in percentage terms):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google Network Members' websites(1)
$13,650
 $14,539
 $15,033
Google Network Members' websites revenues as a percentage of Google segment revenues(1)
24.6% 22.1 % 20.2 %
Paid clicks change  2 % (7)%
Cost-per-click change  (6)% (3)%
(1)
Prior period amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification primarily related to DoubleClick ad serving software revenues from Google other revenues to Advertising Revenues from Google Network Members' websites to conform with the current period presentation.
Google Network Members whoseMembers' websites do not meet our quality requirements. We may also continuerevenues consist primarily of:
AdSense (such as AdSense for Search, AdSense for Content, etc.);
AdExchange;
AdMob;
All DoubleClick-related revenues including DoubleClick Bid Manager revenues; and
Other Network products including AdSense for Domains.
Our Google Network Members' websites revenues increased $494 million from 2014 to take steps to reduce the number of accidental clicks2015. The increase was primarily driven by strength in programmatic advertising buying, offset by our users. These steps could negatively affectcontinued AdSense advertising policy changes aimed at enriching the experience for users and the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies. The decrease in Network Members' websites revenues as a percentage of Google segment revenues is due to relatively slower growth rate of our revenues.

Both seasonal fluctuations in internet usage and traditional retail seasonality have affected, and are likelyNetwork Members' websites revenues compared to continue to affect, our business. Internet usage generally slows during the summer months, and commercial queries typically increase significantly in the fourth quarterthat of each year. These seasonal trends have caused, and will likely continue to cause, fluctuations in our quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequentialGoogle websites revenues as well as Google other revenues.

The decreases in both paid clicks and cost-per-click paid by our advertisers from 2014 to 2015 were primarily driven by ongoing product and policy changes designed to reduce lower quality inventory on AdSense for Search, changes in property and device mix, product mix, and geographic mix, and the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.
Our Google Network Members' websites revenues increased $889 million from 2013 to 2014. The increase was mainly due to certain monetization improvements including new and richer ad formats and an increase in the number of Google Network Members, partially offset by certain AdSense advertising policy changes aimed at enriching the experience for users. The decrease in Network Members' websites revenues as a percentage of Google segment revenues is due to relatively slower growth of Network Members' websites revenues compared to that of Google websites revenues as well as Google other revenues.
The increase in paid clicks from 2013 to 2014 was due to certain monetization improvements including new and richer ad formats, an increase in aggregate paid clicktraffic across all platforms, the continued global expansion of our products, advertisers, and user base, and an increase in the number of Google Network Members, partially offset by certain advertising policy changes. The decrease in the average cost-per-click from 2013 to 2014 was due to various factors, such as the geographic mix, device mix, property mix, ongoing product and policy changes, and the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.

27

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google other revenues
The following table presents our Google other revenues (in millions), and those revenues expressed as a percentage of Google segment revenues, for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google other revenues(1)
$4,435
 $6,050
 $7,151
Google other revenues as a percentage of Google segment revenues(1)
8.0% 9.3% 9.6%
(1)
Prior period amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification primarily related to DoubleClick ad serving software revenues from Google other revenues to Advertising Revenues from Google Network Members' websites to conform with the current period presentation.
Google other revenues consist primarily of:
Sales of apps and media content in the Google Play store;
Sales of certain Google branded hardware, such as Chromecast;
Service fees received for cloud and apps and our Maps API; and
Licensing-related revenue.
Google other revenues increased $1,101 million from 2014 to 2015 and increased as a percentage of Google segment revenues. These increases were primarily due tothe growth rates.

of our sales of digital content products in the Google Play store, primarily apps (revenues which we recognize net of payout to partners). In addition, there was an increase in revenues from service fees received for cloud and apps offerings. These increases were partially offset by the general strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies.

Google other revenues increased $1,615 million from 2013 to 2014 and increased as a percentage of Google segment revenues. The increase was primarily due to growth of our sales of digital content products in the Google Play store, primarily apps.
Other Bets
The following table presents our Other Bets revenues (in millions), and those revenues expressed as a percentage of consolidated revenues, for the periods presented:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Other Bets revenues$12
 $327
 $448
Other Bets revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues0.0% 0.5% 0.6%
Other Bets revenues consist primarily of:
Sales of Nest branded hardware;
Revenues from internet and TV services; and
Revenues from licensing and R&D services.
Our Other Bets revenues increased $121 million from 2014 to 2015 and remained relatively flat as a percentage of consolidated revenues. The increase was primarily due to increases in revenues from sales of Nest branded hardware and revenues from internet and TV services, partially offset by a decrease in licensing revenues. As Nest was acquired in February 2014, the increase in our Nest revenues is impacted by a partial year of revenues in 2014 as compared to a full year in 2015.
Our Other Bets revenues increased $315 million from 2013 to 2014 and increased as a percentage of consolidated revenues. This is primarily due to the acquisition of Nest in 2014 as well as an increase of licensing revenues.

28

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Consolidated Revenues by Geography
The following table presents our domestic and international revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues, determined based on the billing addresses of our customers:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
United States46% 45% 46%
United Kingdom10% 10% 10%
Rest of the world44% 45% 44%
For the amounts of revenues by geography, please refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Constant Currency and Constant Currency Growth
The impact of exchange rates on our business is an important factor in understanding period to period comparisons. Our international revenues are favorably impacted as the U.S. dollar weakens relative to other foreign currencies, and unfavorably impacted as the U.S dollar strengthens relative to other foreign currencies. We believe the presentation of results on a constant currency basis in addition to reported results helps improve the ability to understand our performance because they exclude the effects of foreign currency volatility that are not indicative of our core operating marginresults.
Constant currency information compares results between periods as if exchange rates had remained constant period over period. We define constant currency revenues as total revenues excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements and hedging activities, and use it to determine the constant currency revenue growth on a year-on-year basis. Constant currency revenues are calculated by translating current period revenues using prior period exchange rates, as well as excluding any hedging gains realized in the current period.
Constant currency revenue growth (expressed as a percentage) is calculated by determining the increase in current period revenues over prior period revenues where current period foreign currency revenues are translated using prior period exchange rates and hedging benefits are excluded from revenues of both periods.
These results should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, results reported in accordance with GAAP. Results on a constant currency basis, as we realizepresent them, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and are not a measure of performance presented in accordance with GAAP.
The following table presents our foreign exchange impact on United Kingdom revenues for the periods presented (in millions; unaudited):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
United Kingdom revenues$5,600
 $6,483
 $7,067
Exclude: Foreign exchange impact on current year revenues using prior period rates67
 (304) 538
Exclude: Hedging gains recognized(63) (3) (133)
Constant currency United Kingdom revenues$5,604
 $6,176
 $7,472
United Kingdom revenue growth rate  16% 9%
United Kingdom constant currency revenue growth rate  12% 15%
In 2015, our revenues from the United Kingdom were unfavorably impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates over the prior year, primarily as the U.S. dollar strengthened relative to the British pound.
In 2014, our revenues from the United Kingdom were favorably impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates over the prior year, primarily as the U.S. dollar weakened relative to the British pound.

29

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The following table presents our foreign exchange impact on Rest of the world and total revenues for the periods presented (in millions; unaudited):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Rest of the world revenues(1)
$24,332
 $30,036
 $33,112
Exclude: Foreign exchange impact on current year revenues using prior period rates535
 857
 5,052
Exclude: Hedging gains recognized(32) (169) (1,267)
Constant currency Rest of the world revenues$24,835
 $30,724
 $36,897
Rest of the world revenue growth rate

 23% 10%
Rest of the world constant currency revenue growth rate

 26% 24%
      
United States revenues(1)
$25,587
 $29,482
 $34,810
United States revenue growth rate

 15% 18%
      
Total consolidated revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
Constant currency total consolidated revenues$56,026
 $66,382
 $79,179
Total consolidated revenue growth rate

 19% 14%
Constant currency total consolidated revenue growth rate

 20% 20%
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities. We revised the classification of such revenues between Rest of the world and U.S. for prior periods. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual report t on Form 10-K for further information.
In 2015, our revenues from the Rest of the world (excluding the United Kingdom) were unfavorably impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily because the U.S. dollar strengthened relative to the Euro, Brazilian real, Australian dollar and Japanese yen.
In 2014, our revenues from the Rest of the world (excluding the United Kingdom) were unfavorably impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, as the U.S. dollar strengthened relative to certain currencies, most notably the Japanese yen and the Australian dollar, and partially offset by the favorable impact of the U.S. dollar weakening against certain currencies, most notably the Euro.
Consolidated Costs and Expenses
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists primarily of traffic acquisition costs which are the advertising revenues shared with our Google Network Members and the amounts paid to our distribution partners who distribute our browser or otherwise direct search queries to our website.
Additionally, other cost of revenues (which is the cost of revenues excluding traffic acquisition costs) includes the following:
The expenses associated with the operation of our data centers (including depreciation, labor, energy, and bandwidth costs);
Content acquisition costs primarily related to payments to certain content providers from whom we license their video and other content for distribution on YouTube and Google Play (we share the fees these sales generate with content providers or pay a fixed fee to these content providers);
Credit card and other transaction fees related to processing customer transactions;
Stock-based compensation expense;
Revenue share payments to mobile carriers;
Inventory costs for hardware we sell; and
Amortization of certain intangible assets.
The following tables present our cost of revenues and cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues, and our traffic acquisition costs and traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues, for the periods presented (in millions):

30

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Traffic acquisition costs$12,258
 $13,497
 $14,343
Other cost of revenues9,735
 12,194
 13,821
Total cost of revenues$21,993
 $25,691
 $28,164
Total cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues39.6% 38.9% 37.6%
      
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Traffic acquisition costs to Google Network Members$9,293
 $9,864
 $10,242
Traffic acquisition costs to distribution partners2,965
 3,633
 4,101
Traffic acquisition costs$12,258
 $13,497
 $14,343
Traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues24.0% 22.6% 21.3%
The cost of revenues that we incur related to revenues generated from ads placed through our AdSense program on the websites of our Google Network Members are significantly higher than the costs of revenues we incur related to revenues generated from ads placed on our Google Network Members’ websites through our AdSense program is significantly lower than the operating margin we realize from revenues generated from ads placed on our websites because most of the advertiser fees from ads served on Google Network Members’ websites are shared with our Google Network Members. For the past five years, growth in advertising revenues from ourGoogle websites has generally exceeded that from our Google Network Members’ websites. This trend has had a positive impact on our operating margins, and we expect thatincome from operations during this will continue for the foreseeable future, although the relative rate of growth in revenues from our websites compared to the rate of growth in revenues from our Google Network Members’ websites may vary over time. Also, the margins on advertising revenues from mobile devices and other newer advertising formats are generally lower than those from desktop computers and tablets. We expect this trend to continue to pressure our margins, particularly if we fail to realize the opportunities we anticipate with the transition to a dynamic multi-screen environment.

We conduct our Motorola business in highly competitive markets, facing both new and established competitors. The markets for many of our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, frequent new product introductions, changing consumer trends, short product life cycles, consumer loyalty and evolving industry standards. Market disruptions caused by new technologies, the entry of new competitors, consolidations among our customers and competitors, changes in regulatory requirements, changes in economic conditions, supply chain interruptions or other factors, can introduce volatility into our businesses. Meeting all of these challenges requires consistent operational planning and execution and investment in technology, resulting in innovative products that meet the needs of our customers around the world.

From an overall business perspective, we continue to invest aggressively in our systems, data centers, corporate facilities, information technology infrastructure, and employees. We increased our hiring in 2012, and we may continue to do so and to provide competitive compensation programs for our employees. Our full-time employee headcount was 32,467 at December 31, 2011 and 53,861 at December 31, 2012, which includes 16,317 headcount from Motorola. Acquisitions will also remain an important component of our strategy and use of capital, and we expect our current pace of acquisitions to continue. We expect our costperiod.

Cost of revenues willincreased $2,473 million from 2014 to 2015. The increase was primarily due to data center costs and an increase in dollars and may increase as a percentage of revenues in future periods, primarilycontent acquisition costs as a result of forecastedincreased activities related to YouTube and digital content. The remaining increase was driven by increases in traffic acquisition costs manufacturing and inventory-related costs, data center costs, content acquisition costs, credit card and other transaction fees, and other costs. In particular, traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues may increase in the future if we are unable to continue to improve the monetization or generation of revenues from traffic on our websites and our Google Network Members’ websites.

As we expand our advertising programs and other products to international markets, we continue to increase our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rates. We have a foreign exchange risk management program that is designed to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. However, this program will not fully offset the effect of fluctuations on our revenues and earnings.

Results of Operations

We completed our acquisition of Motorola on May 22, 2012 (the acquisition date). The operating results of Motorola were included in our Consolidated Statements of Income from the acquisition date through December 31, 2012. In December 2012, we entered into an agreement for the disposition of the Motorola Home segment and the related financial results are presented as net loss from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Subsequent to the acquisition in May 2012, we initiated a restructuring plan in our Motorola business. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of this restructuring plan and the associated restructuring charges. We continue to evaluate our plans and further restructuring actions may occur, which may cause us to incur additional restructuring charges, some of which may be significant.

The following table presents our historical operating results as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

   Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2011  2012 

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:

    

Revenues:

    

Google (advertising and other)

   100.0  100.0  91.8

Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0    0    8.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   100.0  100.0  100.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

    

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)

   35.5    34.8    34.2  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0    0    6.9  

Research and development

   12.8    13.6    13.5  

Sales and marketing

   9.5    12.1    12.2  

General and administrative

   6.8    7.2    7.8  

Charge related to the resolution of Department of Justice investigation

   0    1.3    0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

   64.6    69.0    74.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   35.4    31.0    25.4  

Interest and other income, net

   1.4    1.5    1.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   36.8    32.5    26.7  

Provision for income taxes

   7.8    6.8    5.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   29.0    25.7    21.5  

Net loss from discontinued operations

   0    0    (0.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   29.0  25.7  21.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues

The following table presents our revenues, by revenue source, for the periods presented (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010   2011   2012 

Google:

      

Advertising revenues:

      

Google websites

  $19,444    $26,145    $31,221  

Google Network Members’ websites

   8,792     10,386     12,465  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total advertising revenues

   28,236     36,531     43,686  

Other revenues

   1,085     1,374     2,353  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Google revenues (advertising and other)

  $29,321    $37,905    $46,039  

Motorola Mobile:

      

Total Motorola Mobile revenues (hardware and other)

   0     0     4,136  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $29,321    $37,905    $50,175  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents our revenues, by business, as a percentage of total revenues for the periods presented:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Google (advertising and other)

   100  100  92

Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0  0  8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   100  100  100

The following table presents our Google revenues, by revenue source, as a percentage of total Google revenues for the periods presented:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Advertising revenues:

    

Google websites

   66  69  68

Google Network Members’ websites

   30  27  27
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total advertising revenues

   96  96  95

Google websites as % of advertising revenues

   69  72  71

Google Network Members’ websites as % of advertising revenues

   31  28  29

Other revenues

   4  4  5

Our revenues increased $12,270 million from 2011 to 2012. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in advertising revenues generated by Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites and, to a lesser extent, an increase in other revenues driven by hardware product sales. The increase in advertising revenues for Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites resulted primarily from an increase in the number of paid clicks through our advertising programs, partially offset by a decrease in the average cost-per-click paid by our advertisers. The increase in the number of paid clicks generated through our advertising programs was due to an increase in aggregate traffic including mobile queries, certain monetization improvements including new ad formats, the continued global expansion of our products, advertisers, and user base, as well as an increase in the number of Google Network Members. The decrease in the average cost-per-click paid by our advertisers was driven by various factors, such as the general strengthening of the U.S dollar compared to certain foreign currencies (primarily the Euro), the revenue shift mix between Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites, the changes in platform mix due to traffic growth in mobile devices, where the average cost-per-click is typically lower compared to desktop computers and tablets, and the changes in geographical mix due to traffic growth in emerging markets, where the average cost-per-click is typically lower compared to more mature markets.

In addition, the increase in our revenues from 2011 to 2012 resulted from the inclusion of revenues from our Motorola Mobile business of $4,136 million.

Our revenues increased $8,584 million from 2010 to 2011. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in advertising revenues generated by Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites. The increase in advertising revenues for Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites resulted primarily from an increase in the number of paid clicks through our advertising programs and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the average cost-per-click paid by our advertisers. The increase in the number of paid clicks generated through our advertising programs was due to an increase in aggregate traffic, certain monetization improvements including new ad formats, and the continued global expansion of our products, and our advertiser and user base, as well as an increase in the number of Google Network Members. The increase in the average cost-per-click paid by our advertisers was primarily driven by the increased spending from advertisers and a general weakening of the U.S dollar compared to foreign currencies (primarily the Euro, Japanese yen, and British pound), partially offset by the

changes in geographical mix due to traffic growth in emerging markets, where the average cost-per-click is typically lower, compared to more mature markets. In addition, the increase in advertising revenues for Google Network Members’ websites from 2010 to 2011 was partially offset by the loss of a search partnership and, to a lesser extent, by a search quality improvement made during the first quarter of 2011.

Improvements in our ability to ultimately monetize increased traffic primarily relate to enhancing the end user experience, including providing end users with ads that are more relevant to their search queries or to the content on the Google Network Members’ websites they visit. For instance, these improvements include increasing site links to be full size links with the URL (uniform resource locator), moving a portion of the first line of the ad to the heading to better promote the content of the ad, providing an option to preview the ad, and moving the ad’s URL to a separate line below the heading for greater page format consistency.

Aggregate paid clicks on Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites increased approximately 34% from 2011 to 2012 and approximately 25% from 2010 to 2011. Average cost-per-click on Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites decreased approximately 12% from 2011 to 2012 and increased approximately 3% from 2010 to 2011. The rate of change in aggregate paid clicks and average cost-per-click, and their correlation with the rate of change in revenues, has fluctuated and may fluctuate in the future because of various factors, including the revenue growth rates on our websites compared to those of our Google Network Members, advertiser competition for keywords, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, seasonality, the fees advertisers are willing to pay based on how they manage their advertising costs, changes in advertising quality or formats, and general economic conditions. In addition, traffic growth in emerging markets compared to more mature markets and across various advertising verticals and channels, including mobile devices, also contributes to these fluctuations. Changes in aggregate paid clicks and average cost-per-click may not be indicative of our performance or advertiser experiences in any specific geographic market, vertical, or industry.

We believe that the increase in the number of paid clicks on Google websites and Google Network Members’ websites is substantially the result of our commitment to improving the relevance and quality of both our search results and the advertisements displayed, which we believe results in a better user experience, which in turn results in more searches, advertisers, and Google Network Members and other partners.

Revenues by Geography

The following table presents our Google domestic and international revenues as a percentage of Google revenues, determined based on the billing addresses of our customers for our Google business:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

United States

   48  46  46

United Kingdom

   11  11  11

Rest of the world

   41  43  43

The following table presents our consolidated domestic and international revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues, determined based on the billing addresses of our customers for our Google business, and shipping addresses of our customers for our Motorola Mobile business:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

United States

   48  46  47

United Kingdom

   11  11  10

Rest of the world

   41  43  43

The growth in revenues from the United States as a percentage of consolidated revenues from 2011 to 2012 was primarily as a result of the inclusion of Motorola Mobile revenues which were primarily generated in the United States.

The general strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to certain foreign currencies (primarily the Euro) from 2011 to 2012 had an unfavorable impact on our international revenues. Had foreign exchange rates remained constant in these periods, our revenues from the United Kingdom would have been $68 million or 1.4% higher and our revenues from the rest of the world would have been approximately $1,211 million or 5.6% higher in 2012. This is before consideration of hedging gains of $18 million and $199 million recognized to revenues from the United Kingdom and the rest of the world in 2012.

The general weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to certain foreign currencies (primarily the Euro, Japanese yen, and British pound) from 2010 to 2011 had a favorable impact on our international revenues. Had foreign exchange rates remained constant in these periods, our revenues from the United Kingdom would have been $129 million, or 3.2%, lower and our revenues from the rest of the world would have been approximately $834 million, or 5.1%, lower in 2011. This is before consideration of hedging gains of $9 million and $34 million recognized to revenues from the United Kingdom and the rest of the world in 2011.

Although we expect to continue to make investments in international markets, these investments may not result in an increase in our international revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2013 or thereafter. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about geographic areas.

Costs and Expenses

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues consists primarily of traffic acquisition costs. Traffic acquisition costs consist of amounts ultimately paid to our Google Network Members under AdSense arrangements and to certain other partners (our distribution partners) who distribute our toolbar and other products (collectively referred to as access points) or otherwise direct search queries to our website (collectively referred to as distribution arrangements). These amounts are primarily based on the revenue share and fixed fee arrangements with our Google Network Members and distribution partners.

Certain distribution arrangements require us to pay our partners based on a fee per access point delivered and not exclusively—or at all—based on revenue share. These fees are non-refundable. Further, these arrangements are terminable at will, although under the terms of certain contracts we or our distribution partners may be subject to penalties in the event of early termination. We recognize fees under these arrangements over the estimated useful lives of the access points (approximately two years) to the extent we can reasonably estimate those lives and they are longer than one year, or based on any contractual revenue share, if greater. Otherwise, the fees are charged to expense as incurred. The estimated useful life of the access points is based on the historical average period of time they generate traffic and revenues.

Cost of revenues also includes the expenses associated with the operation of our data centers, including depreciation, labor, energy, and bandwidth costs, credit card and other transaction fees related to processing customer transactions, amortization of acquired intangible assets, as well as content acquisition costs. We have entered into arrangements with certain content providers under which we distribute or license their video and other content. In a number of these arrangements, we display ads on the pages of our websites from which the content is viewed and share most of the fees these ads generate with the content providers. We also license content on the pages of our web sites from which the content is sold and share most of the fees these sales generate with content providers. To the extent we are obligated to make guaranteed minimum revenue share payments to our content providers, we recognize as content acquisition costs the contractual revenue share amount or on a straight-line basis, whichever is greater, over the terms of the agreements.

In addition, cost of revenues includes manufacturing and inventory-related costs from our Motorola Mobile business.

The following tables present our cost of revenues and cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues by business, and our traffic acquisition costs, and traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues in the Google business, for the periods presented (dollars in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)

  $10,417   $13,188   $17,176  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0    0    3,458  

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other) as a percentage of Google revenues

   35.5  34.8  37.3

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other) as a percentage of Motorola Mobile revenues

   0    0    83.6

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Traffic acquisition costs related to AdSense arrangements

  $6,162   $7,294   $8,791  

Traffic acquisition costs related to distribution arrangements

   1,155    1,517    2,165  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total traffic acquisition costs

  $7,317   $8,811   $10,956  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues

   25.9  24.1  25.1

Cost of revenues increased $7,446 million from 2011 to 2012. The increase was primarily related to the inclusion of manufacturing and inventory-related costs from our Motorola Mobile business of $3,458 million. Additionally, there was an increase in traffic acquisition costs of $2,145$846 million, resulting from more advertiser fees generated through our AdSense program driven primarily by an increase in advertising revenues, as well as more fees paid to our distribution partners for additional traffic directed to our websites, as well as more distribution fees paid.websites. Additionally, there was an impairment charge of $378 million recognized in 2014 related to a patent licensing royalty asset acquired in connection with the Motorola acquisition that did not recur in 2015. The remaining increase was primarily driven by increasedecrease in data center costs, hardware product costs and content acquisition costs. The increase inaggregate traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues was primarily thea result of a greatershift of mix from Google Network Members' websites revenue to Google websites revenue.

Cost of revenues increased $3,698 million from 2013 to 2014. The increase was partially due to increases in traffic acquisition costs relatedof $1,239 million resulting from more distribution fees paid for additional traffic directed to distribution arrangements comparedGoogle websites, as well as more advertiser fees paid to theGoogle Network Members, driven primarily by an increase in advertising revenues generated by Google websites.revenues. The remaining increase in Google cost of revenues as a percentage of Google revenues was alsoprimarily driven by an increase in hardware product costs.

Cost of revenues increased $2,771 million from 2010 to 2011. The increase was primarily related to an increase in trafficdata center costs, content acquisition costs of $1,132 million resulting from more advertiser fees generated through our AdSense program. The increase was also related to an increase in traffic acquisition costs of $362 million from our distribution arrangements as a result of more traffic directedincreased usage activities related to YouTube and digital content by our websites, as well as more distribution fees paid.users, and revenue share payments to mobile carriers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). In addition, the increase was also driven by the impairment charge described above. The decrease in traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues was primarily due to an increase in the proportiona result of advertising revenues from oura shift of mix between Google websites compared to ourrevenue and Google Network Members’Members' websites more revenues realized from Google Network Members to whom we pay less revenue share, and, to a lesser extent, expiration of an AdSense arrangement under which we paid guaranteed minimum revenue share. In addition, there was an increase in data center costs of $784 million, primarily resulting from the depreciation of additional information technology assets and data center buildings and an increase in labor, energy, and bandwidth costs, and an increase in content acquisition costs of $236 million, primarily related to content displayed on YouTube, partially offset by a decrease in mobile phone costs.

revenue.

We expect cost of revenues will increase in dollar amount and may increasefluctuate as a percentage of total revenues in 20132016 and in future periods, primarily as a result of increases in traffic acquisition costs, data center costs, manufacturing and inventory-related costs, content acquisition costs, credit card and other transaction fees, and other costs. Traffic acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenues may fluctuate in the future based on a number of factors, including the following:

The relative growth rates of revenues from ourGoogle websites and from our Google Network Members’ websites.

Members' website;

The growth rates of expenses associated with our data center operations, as well as our hardware inventory costs;

Increased proportion of other non-advertising revenues as part of our total revenues;
Whether we are able to enter into more AdSenserevenue share arrangements with Google Network Members and distribution partners that provide for lower revenue share obligations or whether increased competition for arrangements with existing and potential Google Network Members and distribution partners results in less favorable revenue share arrangements.

arrangements;

Whether we are able to continue to improve the monetization of traffic on ourGoogle websites and our Google Network Members’ websites.

Members' websites; and

The relative growth rates of expenses associated with distribution arrangements and the related revenues generated, including whether we share with certain existing and new distribution partners, including mobile distribution partners, proportionately more of the aggregate advertising fees that we earn from paid clicks derived from search queries these partners direct to our websites.

generated.


31

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Research and Development

The following table presents our research and developmentR&D expenses, and research and developmentthose expenses as a percentage of our revenues, for the periods presented (dollars in(in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Research and development expenses

  $3,762   $5,162   $6,793  

Research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues

   12.8  13.6  13.5

Research and development

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Research and development expenses$7,137
 $9,832
 $12,282
Research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues12.9% 14.9% 16.3%
R&D expenses consist primarily of compensationof:
Labor and relatedfacilities-related costs for personnelemployees responsible for the researchR&D of our existing and development of new and existing products and services. We expense researchservices;
Depreciation and development costs as incurred.

Researchequipment-related expenses; and development

Stock-based compensation expense.
R&D expenses increased $1,631$2,450 million and increased as a percentage of revenues from 20112014 to 2012, which includes $7102015. These increases were primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $1,502 million and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $487 million, both largely as a result of a 16% increase in R&D headcount. The increase in labor and facilities-related costs was also impacted by expenses resulting from project milestones in Other Bets established several years ago. In addition, there was an increase in depreciation and equipment-related expenses of approximately $248 million and an increase in professional services of $174 million due to additional expenses incurred for consulting and outsourced services.
R&D expenses increased $2,695 million and increased as a percentage of revenues from 2013 to 2014. These increases were primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $1,289 million and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $559 million, both largely as a result of a 27% increase in R&D headcount. In addition, there was an increase in depreciation and equipment-related expenses of $425 million and an increase in professional services of $371 million due to additional expenses incurred for consulting and outsourced services.
We expect that R&D expenses will increase in dollar amount and may fluctuate as a percentage of revenues in 2016 and future periods.
Sales and Marketing
The following table presents our sales and marketing expenses, and those expenses as a percentage of revenues, for the periods presented (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Sales and marketing expenses$6,554
 $8,131
 $9,047
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues11.8% 12.3% 12.1%
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of:
Labor and facilities-related costs for our personnel engaged in sales and marketing, sales support, and certain customer service functions;
Advertising and promotional expenditures related to Motorola Mobile.our products and services; and
Stock-based compensation expense.
Sales and marketing expenses increased $916 million and remained relatively flat as a percentage of revenues from 2014 to 2015. The remaining increase of $921 millionin dollar amount was primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $359$329 million largely as a result of a 15% increase in research and development headcount, an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $213 million, an increase in depreciation and equipment-related expenses of $147 million, and an increase in professional services expense of $66 million.

Research and development expenses increased $1,400 million from 2010 to 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $875$184 million, largely asresulting from a result of a 23% increase in research and development headcount, including headcount from acquisitions, as well as an increase in employee base salaries of approximately 10%. In addition, there was an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $200 million.

We expect that research and development expenses will increase in dollar amount and may increase as a percentage of total revenues in 2013 and future periods because we expect to continue to invest in building the necessary employee and system infrastructure required to support the development of new, and improve existing, products and services.

Sales and Marketing

The following table presents our sales and marketing expenses, and sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the periods presented (dollars in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Sales and marketing expenses

  $2,799   $4,589   $6,143  

Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues

   9.5  12.1  12.2

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel engaged in customer service, sales, and sales support functions, as well as advertising and promotional expenditures.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $1,554 million from 2011 to 2012, which includes $678 million related to Motorola Mobile. The remaining increase of $876 million was primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $390 million, largely as a result of a 14%12% increase in sales and marketing headcount, as well as an increase in advertising and promotional expenses of $288 million. In addition, there was an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $87 million.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $1,790 million from 2010 to 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $787 million, largely as a result of a 36% increase in sales and marketing headcount, including headcount from acquisitions, as well as an increase in employee base salaries of approximately 10%.headcount. In addition, there was an increase in advertising and promotional expenses of $700$184 million and an increase in professional service fees of $158 million due to additional expenses incurred for consulting and outsourced services.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $1,577 million from 2013 to 2014 and increased as a percentage of revenues from 2013 to 2014. These increases were primarily due to an increase in advertising and promotional expenses of $614 million.

In addition, there was an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $571 million and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $163 million, both largely resulting from a 15% increase in sales and marketing headcount.


32

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

We expect that sales and marketing expenses will increase in dollar amount and may increasefluctuate as a percentage of total revenues in 20132016 and future periods, as we expand our business globally, increase advertising and promotional expenditures in connection with new and existing products, and increase the level of service we provide to our advertisers, Google Network Members, and other partners.

periods.

General and Administrative

The following table presents our general and administrative expenses, and general and administrativethose expenses as a percentage of total revenues, for the periods presented (dollars in(in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

General and administrative expenses

  $1,962   $2,724   $3,845  

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues

   6.8  7.2  7.8

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
General and administrative expenses$4,432
 $5,851
 $6,136
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues8.0% 8.9% 8.2%
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensationof:
Labor and relatedfacilities-related costs for personnel and facilities, and include costs related toin our facilities, finance, human resources, information technology, and legal organizations,organizations;
Depreciation and fees for professional services. equipment-related expenses;
Professional services are principally comprised offees primarily related to outside legal, audit, information technology consulting, and outsourcing services. General and administrative expenses also include amortizationservices;
Amortization of certain acquired intangible assets.

assets; and

Stock-based compensation expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $1,121$285 million and decreased as a percentage of revenues from 20112014 to 2012, which includes $364 million related to Motorola Mobile.2015. The remaining increase of $757 millionin dollar amount was primarily due to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets of $274 million, an increase in professional servicesstock-based compensation expense of $147$136 million the majority of which was related to legal costs,and an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $122$69 million, primarily asboth largely resulting from a result of a 11%15% increase in general and administrative headcount, as well asheadcount. In addition, there was an increase in stock-based compensation expensedepreciation and equipment-related expenses of $89 million.

$121 million and an increase of $80 million of miscellaneous general and administrative expenses. These factors were partially offset by a decrease in professional service fees and expenses of $128 million, primarily due to lower legal-related costs.

General and administrative expenses increased $762$1,419 million and increased as a percentage of revenues from 20102013 to 2011. This increase was2014. The increases were primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities-related costs of $350$576 million primarily asand an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $260 million, both largely resulting from a result of a 37%24% increase in general and administrative headcount and an increase in employee base salaries of approximately 10%, as well as an increase in expense related to professional services of $260 million, the majority of which were related to consulting services and legal costs.headcount. In addition, there was an increase in stock-based compensationprofessional services related expense of $116 million.

As we expand our business$314 million due to higher legal related costs, as well as additional consulting and incur additional expenses, weoutsourced services.

We expect general and administrative expenses will increase in dollar amount and may increasefluctuate as a percentage of total revenues in 20132016 and future periods.

Charge Related to the Resolution of Department of Justice Investigation

In connection with a resolution of an investigation by the United States Department of Justice into the use of Google advertising by certain advertisers, we accrued $500 million during the first quarter of 2011, which was paid in August 2011 upon final resolution of that matter.

Stock-Based Compensation

The following table presents our equity settled stock-based compensation expense, and equity settled stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenues, as reflected in our consolidated results from continuing operations for the periods presented (dollars in(in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Stock-based compensation

  $1,376   $1,974   $2,649  

Stock-based compensation as a percentage of total revenues

   4.7  5.2  5.3

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Stock-based compensation$3,127
 $4,175
 $5,203
Stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenues5.6% 6.3% 6.9%
Stock-based compensation related to equity settled awards increased $675$1,028 million from 20112014 to 2012. This increase was2015 and $1,048 million from 2013 to 2014, and increased as a percentage of revenues in both periods. These increases were primarily due to additional stock awards issued to existing and new employees, awards issued in connection with the acquisition of Motorola, and acceleration of certain awards resulting from Motorola restructuring.driven by headcount growth. Additionally, we recognized stock-based compensation expense forassociated with awards ultimately settled in cash of $0 million, $0 million, and $50 million in the Motorola Home segment was included in net loss from discontinued operations.

Stock-based compensation increased $598 million from 2010 to 2011. This increase was largely due to additional stock awards issued to existingyears ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and new employees.

2015, respectively.

We estimate equity settled stock-based compensation expense to be approximately $2.5$5.3 billion in 20132016 and $2.7$5.8 billion thereafter.thereafter related to stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015. This estimate does not include expenses to be recognized related to employee stockstock-based awards that are granted after December 31, 2012 or non-employee stock awards that have been or may be granted. In addition, to the extent2015. If forfeiture rates are different from what we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

Interest


33

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Consolidated Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest

The following table presents other income (expense), net, and other income (expense), net, as a percentage of revenues (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Other income (expense), net$496
 $763
 $291
Other income (expense), net, as a percentage of revenues0.9% 1.1% 0.4%
Other income (expense), net, decreased $472 million from 2014 to 2015. This decrease was primarily related to a writedown of securities received in conjunction with the sale of a business, as well as, reduced gains on non-marketable investments as compared to 2014. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in interest income as a result of increased cash and fixed income investments.
Other income (expense), net, increased $42$267 million from 20112013 to 2012.2014. This increase was primarily driven by realized gains on non-marketable equity investments of $159 million and previously-held equity interests of $126 million, as well as a gainloss recognized on divestiture of business of $188 millionbusinesses (other than Motorola Home) in 2012, an impairment charge related to equity investments of $110 million in 2011,2013. These increases were partially offset by an increase in foreign currency exchange loss of $152$23 million and a decrease in interest income of $99$20 million.

Interest and other income, net increased $169 million from 2010 to 2011. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in interest income of $233 million due to an increase in our cash and investment balances and higher yields, as well as an increase in net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments of $69 million, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $53 million primarily related to our long-term debt program. In addition, we recorded an impairment charge of $110 million related to certain equity investments during the year ended December 31, 2011.

The costs of our foreign exchange hedging activities that we recognized to interest and other income, net, are primarily a function of the notional amount of the option and forward contracts and their related duration, the movement of the foreign exchange rates relative to the strike prices of the contracts, as well asand the volatility of the foreign exchange rates.

As we expand our international business, we believe costs related to hedging activities under our foreign exchange risk management program may increase in dollar amount in 20132016 and future periods.

Consolidated Provision for Income Taxes

The following table presents our provision for income taxes, and effective tax rate for the periods presented (dollars in(in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Provision for income taxes

  $2,291   $2,589   $2,598  

Effective tax rate

   21.2  21.0  19.4

 Year Ended December 31,
 
2013(1)
 
2014(1)
 2015
Provision for income taxes$2,739
 $3,639
 $3,303
Effective tax rate17.2% 21.1% 16.8%
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our provision for income taxes increasedand our effective tax rate decreased from 20112014 to 2012, primarily2015, largely due to a discrete benefit recognized in 2015 as a result of increasesthe resolution of a multi-year audit in federal income taxes, driven by higher taxable income year over yearthe U.S. and expiration of the federal research and development credit, partially offset by proportionately more earnings realized in countries that have lower statutory tax rates.
Our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate decreasedincreased from 20112013 to 2012, primarily as a result of2014, largely due to proportionately more earnings realized in countries that have lowerhigher statutory tax rates as well as a discrete item related to an investigation by the Department of Justiceand more benefit recognized in 2011, which was not deductible for income tax purposes.

Our provision for income taxes increased from 20102013 relative to 2011, primarily as a result of increases in federal income taxes, driven by higher taxable income year over year, partially offset by proportionately more earnings realized in countries that have lower statutory tax rates. Our effective tax rate decreased from 2010 to 2011, primarily as a result of proportionately more earnings realized in countries that have lower statutory tax rates, a decrease in state income taxes, and an increase in federal research and development credits recognized in 2011, partially offset by recognition of a charge related2014 due to the resolutionretroactive extension of an investigation by the Department of Justice which is not deductible for tax purposes.

The2012 federal research and development credit, expiredoffset by a benefit taken on December 31, 2011. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Acta valuation allowance release related to a capital loss carryforward in 2014.

A reconciliation of 2012 was signed into law. Under this act, the federal research and development credit was retroactively extended for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2011 and before January 1, 2014. The effects of these changes in thestatutory income tax law will result in a tax benefit which will be recognized in the first quarter of 2013, which is the quarter in which the law was enacted.

Ourrate to our effective tax rate could fluctuate significantlyis set forth in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on a quarterly basis andForm 10-K.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected to the extentby earnings arebeing lower than anticipated in countries that have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries that have higher statutory rates. Our effective tax rate could also fluctuate due torates, the net gains and losses recognized by legal entities on certain hedges and related hedged intercompany and other transactions under our foreign exchange risk management program, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles, as well as certain discrete items. In addition, we
We are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing discussions with tax authorities and the impact, if any, of the expected expiration of the statute of limitations


34

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

in various taxing jurisdictions. Further information on these issues, the treatment of undistributed foreign earnings and a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate can be found in Notes 11 and 15 of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below for additional information about our provision for income taxes.

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate is set forth in Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net Loss from Discontinued Operations

In December 2012, we entered into an agreement with Arris and certain other persons providing for the disposition of the Motorola Home business for total consideration of approximately $2.35 billion in cash and common stock, subject to certain adjustments. The transaction is expected to close in 2013. As a result, the

following financial information of Motorola Home was presented as net loss from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

   Year Ended
December 31,
2012
 
   (In millions) 

Revenues

  $2,028  

Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes

   (22

Provision for income taxes

   (29

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $(51

Quarterly Results of Operations

You should read the

The following tables presenting our quarterly results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements. You should also keep in mind that ourOur operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future quarters or for a full year. Please note that previously reported quarters have been adjusted to show discontinued operations for the disposition of the Motorola Home business.

The following table presents our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2012.2015. This table includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for fair presentation of our consolidated financial position and operating results for the quarters presented. Both seasonal fluctuations in internet usage and traditional retail seasonality have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our business. Internet usage generally slows during the summer months, and commercial queries typically increase significantly in the fourth quarter of each year. These seasonal trends have caused, and will likely continue to cause, fluctuations in our quarterly results, including fluctuations in sequential revenue growth rates.

  Quarter Ended 
  Mar 31,
2011
  Jun 30,
2011
  Sep 30,
2011
  Dec 31,
2011
  Mar 31,
2012
  Jun 30,
2012
  Sep 30,
2012
  Dec 31,
2012
 
  (In millions, except per share amounts) 
  (unaudited) 

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:

        

Revenues:

        

Google (advertising and other)

 $8,575   $9,026   $9,720   $10,584   $10,645   $10,964   $11,526   $12,905  

Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

  0    0    0    0    0    843    1,778    1,514  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  8,575    9,026    9,720    10,584    10,645    11,807    13,304    14,419  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

        

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)

  2,936    3,172    3,378    3,702    3,789    3,984    4,440    4,963  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

  0    0    0    0    0    693    1,515    1,250  

Research and development

  1,226    1,234    1,404    1,298    1,441    1,538    1,879    1,935  

Sales and marketing

  1,026    1,091    1,204    1,268    1,269    1,413    1,710    1,751  

General and administrative

  591    648    676    809    757    942    1,020    1,126  

Charge related to the resolution of Department of Justice investigation

  500    0    0    0    0    0    0    0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

  6,279    6,145    6,662    7,077    7,256    8,570    10,564    11,025  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

  2,296    2,881    3,058    3,507    3,389    3,237    2,740    3,394  

Interest and other income (expense), net

  96    204    302    (18  156    253    65    152  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

  2,392    3,085    3,360    3,489    3,545    3,490    2,805    3,546  

Provision for income taxes

  594    580    631    784    655    657    647    639  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

 $1,798   $2,505   $2,729   $2,705   $2,890   $2,833   $2,158   $2,907  

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

  0    0    0    0    0    (48  18    (21
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $1,798   $2,505   $2,729   $2,705   $2,890   $2,785   $2,176   $2,886  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

        

Continuing operations

 $5.59   $7.77   $8.44   $8.34   $8.88   $8.68   $6.59   $8.83  

Discontinued operations

  0    0    0    0    0    (0.14  0.05   $(0.06
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per share—basic

 $5.59   $7.77   $8.44   $8.34   $8.88   $8.54   $6.64   $8.77  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

        

Continuing operations

 $5.51   $7.68   $8.33   $8.22   $8.75   $8.56   $6.48   $8.68  

Discontinued operations

  0    0    0    0    0    (0.14  0.05    (0.06
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per share—diluted

 $5.51   $7.68   $8.33   $8.22   $8.75   $8.42   $6.53   $8.62  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Quarter Ended
 
Mar 31,
2014
(1)
 
Jun 30,
2014
(1)
 
Sep 30,
2014
(1)
 
Dec 31,
2014
(1)
 
Mar 31,
2015
(1)
 Jun 30,
2015
 Sep 30,
2015
 Dec 31,
2015
 (In millions, except per share amounts) (unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
Revenues$15,420
 $15,955
 $16,523
 $18,103
 $17,258
 $17,727
 $18,675
 $21,329
Costs and expenses:               
Cost of revenues5,961
 6,114
 6,695
 6,921
 6,356
 6,583
 7,037
 8,188
Research and development2,126
 2,238
 2,655
 2,813
 2,753
 2,789
 3,230
 3,510
Sales and marketing1,729
 1,941
 2,084
 2,377
 2,065
 2,080
 2,223
 2,679
General and administrative1,489
 1,404
 1,365
 1,593
 1,637
 1,450
 1,477
 1,572
Total costs and expenses11,305
 11,697
 12,799
 13,704
 12,811
 12,902
 13,967
 15,949
Income from operations4,115
 4,258
 3,724
 4,399
 4,447
 4,825
 4,708
 5,380
Other income (expense), net357
 145
 133
 128
 157
 131
 183
 (180)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes4,472
 4,403
 3,857
 4,527
 4,604
 4,956
 4,891
 5,200
Provision for income taxes903
 984
 933
 819
 1,089
 1,025
 912
 277
Net income from continuing operations$3,569
 $3,419
 $2,924
 $3,708
 $3,515
 $3,931
 $3,979
 $4,923
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations(198) (68) (185) 967
 0
 0
 0
 0
Net income$3,371
 $3,351
 $2,739
 $4,675
 $3,515
 $3,931
 $3,979
 $4,923
Less: Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 522
 0
 0
Net income available to all stockholders$3,371
 $3,351
 $2,739
 $4,675
 $3,515
 $3,409
 $3,979
 $4,923
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

35

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The basic and diluted income per share data as included on the consolidated statements of income of Alphabet Inc. were as follows for the periods presented (not required for Google pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a)):
 Quarter Ended
 
Mar 31,
2014
(1)
 
Jun 30,
2014
(1)
 
Sep 30,
2014
(1)
 
Dec 31,
2014
(1)
 
Mar 31,
2015
(1)
 Jun 30,
2015
 Sep 30,
2015
 Dec 31,
2015
 (unaudited)
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:               
Continuing operations$5.30
 $5.06
 $4.32
 $5.46
 $5.16
 $4.99
 $5.80
 $7.16
Discontinued operations(0.29) (0.10) (0.27) 1.43
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class A and B common stock$5.01
 $4.96
 $4.05
 $6.89
 $5.16
 $4.99
 $5.80
 $7.16
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:               
Continuing operations$5.30
 $5.06
 $4.32
 $5.46
 $5.16
 $6.51
 $5.80
 $7.16
Discontinued operations(0.29) (0.10) (0.27) 1.43
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class C capital stock$5.01
 $4.96
 $4.05
 $6.89
 $5.16
 $6.51
 $5.80
 $7.16
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:               
Continuing operations$5.21
 $4.98
 $4.25
 $5.38
 $5.10
 $4.93
 $5.73
 $7.06
Discontinued operations(0.29) (0.10) (0.27) 1.41
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class A and B common stock$4.92
 $4.88
 $3.98
 $6.79
 $5.10
 $4.93
 $5.73
 $7.06
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:               
Continuing operations$5.21
 $4.98
 $4.25
 $5.38
 $5.10
 $6.43
 $5.73
 $7.06
Discontinued operations(0.29) (0.10) (0.27) 1.41
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class C capital stock$4.92
 $4.88
 $3.98
 $6.79
 $5.10
 $6.43
 $5.73
 $7.06
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

36

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The following table presents our unaudited quarterly results of operations as a percentage of revenues for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2012:

   Quarter Ended 
   Mar 31,
2011
  Jun 30,
2011
  Sep 30,
2011
  Dec 31,
2011
  Mar 31,
2012
  Jun 30,
2012
  Sep 30,
2012
  Dec 31,
2012
 

Revenues:

         

Google (advertising and other)

   100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  92.9  86.6  89.5

Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0    0    0    0    0    7.1    13.4    10.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

         

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)

   34.2    35.1    34.8    35.0    35.6    33.7    33.4    34.4  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0    0    0    0    0    5.9    11.3    8.7  

Research and development

   14.3    13.7    14.4    12.3    13.5    13.0    14.1    13.4  

Sales and marketing

   12.0    12.1    12.4    12.0    11.9    12.0    12.9    12.2  

General and administrative

   6.9    7.2    6.9    7.6    7.2    8.0    7.7    7.8  

Charge related to the resolution of Department of Justice investigation

   5.8    0    0    0    0    0    0    0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

   73.2    68.1    68.5    66.9    68.2    72.6    79.4    76.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   26.8    31.9    31.5    33.1    31.8    27.4    20.6    23.5  

Interest and other income (expense), net

   1.1    2.3    3.1    (0.1  1.5    2.1    0.5    1.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   27.9    34.2    34.6    33.0    33.3    29.5    21.1    24.6  

Provision for income taxes

   6.9    6.4    6.5    7.4    6.2    5.5    4.9    4.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   21.0  27.8  28.1  25.6  27.1  24.0  16.2  20.2

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

   0  0  0  0  0  (0.4%)   0.1  (0.2%) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   21.0  27.8  28.1  25.6  27.1  23.6  16.3  20.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liquidity2015:

 Quarter Ended
 
Mar 31,
2014
(1)
 
Jun 30,
2014
(1)
 
Sep 30,
2014
(1)
 
Dec 31,
2014
(1)
 
Mar 31,
2015
(1)
 Jun 30,
2015
 Sep 30,
2015
 Dec 31,
2015
 (unaudited)
Revenues100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %
Costs and expenses:               
Cost of revenues38.7
 38.3
 40.5
 38.2
 36.8
 37.1
 37.7
 38.4
Research and development13.8
 14.0
 16.1
 15.5
 16.0
 15.7
 17.3
 16.4
Sales and marketing11.2
 12.2
 12.6
 13.1
 12.0
 11.8
 11.9
 12.6
General and administrative9.6
 8.8
 8.3
 8.9
 9.4
 8.2
 7.9
 7.4
Total costs and expenses73.3
 73.3
 77.5
 75.7
 74.2
 72.8
 74.8
 74.8
Income from operations26.7
 26.7
 22.5
 24.3
 25.8
 27.2
 25.2
 25.2
Other income (expense), net2.3
 0.9
 0.8
 0.7
 0.9
 0.8
 1.0
 (0.8)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes29.0
 27.6
 23.3
 25.0
 26.7
 28.0
 26.2
 24.4
Provision for income taxes5.8
 6.2
 5.6
 4.5
 6.3
 5.8
 4.9
 1.3
Net income from continuing operations23.2
 21.4
 17.7
 20.5
 20.4
 22.2
 21.3
 23.1
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations(1.3) (0.4) (1.1) 5.3
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
Net income21.9 % 21.0 % 16.6 % 25.8% 20.4% 22.2% 21.3% 23.1 %
Less: Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0 %
Net income available to all stockholders21.9 % 21.0 % 16.6 % 25.8% 20.4% 19.2% 21.3% 23.1 %
(1)
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015. Please refer to Note 1 and Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Resources and Capital Resources

In summary, our cash flows are as follows (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $11,081   $14,565   $16,619  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (10,680  (19,041  (13,056

Net cash provided by financing activities

   3,050    807    1,229  

At Liquidity

As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had $48.1$73.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. Cash equivalents and marketable securities areare comprised of time deposits, money market and other funds, including cash collateral received related to our securities lending program, fixed-income bond funds, highly liquid debt instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies, debt instruments issued by foreign governments, anddebt instruments issued by municipalities in the U.S., corporate debt securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities.

From time to time, we may hold marketable equity securities obtained through acquisitions or strategic investments in private companies that subsequently go public.

As of December 31, 2012, $31.42015, $42.9 billion of the $48.1$73.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities was held by our foreign subsidiaries. If these funds arewere needed for our operations in the U.S., we would be required to

accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations.

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, as well as the cash flow that we generate from our operations. AtAs of December 31, 2012,2015, we had unused letters of credit forof approximately $89$752 million. We believe that our sources of funding will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months. Our liquidity could be negatively affected by a decrease in demand for our products and services. In addition, we may make acquisitions, increase our capital expenditures, or license products and technologies complementary to our business and may need to raise additional capital through future

37

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

debt or equity financing to provide for greater flexibility to fund any such acquisitions and licensingthese activities. Additional financing may not be available at all or on terms favorable to us.

We have a debt financing program of up to $3.0 billion through the issuance of commercial paper. Net proceeds from this program are used for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had $2.5$2.0 billion of commercial paper outstanding recorded as short-term debt, with a weighted-average interest rate of 0.2% that maturematures at various dates through 2013. Average commercial paper borrowings during the year were $2.2 billion and the maximum amount outstanding during the year was $2.7 billion.February 2016. In conjunction with this program, we have a $3.0 billion revolving credit facility expiring in July 2016. The interest rate for the credit facility is determined based on a formula using certain market rates. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we were in compliance with the financial covenant in the credit facility and no amounts were outstanding.

We intend to align our capital structure so that debt is held at the holding company level. In January 2016, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to issue up to $5.0 billion of commercial paper from time to time and to enter into a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility to replace Google's existing $3.0 billion revolving credit facility.  
In May 2011, we issued $3.0 billion of unsecured senior notes (2011 Notes) in three equal tranches, due in 2014, 2016, and 2021, with stated interest rates of 1.25%, 2.125%, and 3.625%.2021. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes2011 Notes were used to repay a portion of our outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes. In February 2014, we issued $1.0 billion of unsecured senior notes (2014 Notes) due in 2024, which was used to repay $1.0 billion of the first tranche of our 2011 Notes that matured in May 2014 and for general corporate purposes.
As of December 31, 2012,2015, the outstanding notes had a total carrying value of $3.0 billion and a total estimated fair value of these notes were $3.0 billion and $3.2$3.1 billion. The estimated fair value was based on quoted prices for our publicly-traded debt as of December 31, 2012. We are not subject to any financial covenants under the notes.

In August 2013, we entered into a $258 million capital lease obligation on certain property expiring in 2028. We intend to exercise the option to purchase the property in 2016. The effective rate of the capital lease obligation approximates the market rate.
In October 2015, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to repurchase up to $5,099,019,513.59 of its Class C capital stock, commencing in the fourth quarter of 2015. The repurchases are being executed from time to time, subject to general business and market conditions and other investment opportunities, through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through the use of 10b5-1 plans. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. As of December 31, 2015, Alphabet repurchased and subsequently retired $1.8 billion of its Class C capital stock. Alphabet's share repurchases in the year ended December 31, 2015 were funded by Google via a return of capital to Alphabet. In January 2016, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to repurchase an additional amount of approximately 514 thousand shares.
For 2013, 2014 and 2015, our cash flows were as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Net cash provided by operating activities$18,659
 $22,376
 $26,024
Net cash used in investing activities(13,679) (21,055) (23,711)
Net cash used in financing activities(857) (1,439) (3,677)
Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash

Our largest source of cash provided by our operations is advertising revenues generated by Google websites and Google Network Members' websites. Additionally, we generate cash through sales of apps and digital content, hardware products, licensing arrangements, and service fees received for cloud and apps and our Maps API. Prior to its divestiture in October 2014, we also generated cash from sales of hardware products related to the Motorola Mobile business.
Our primary uses of cash from our operating activities include payments to our Google Network Members and distribution partners, and payments for content acquisition costs. Prior to the sale of the Motorola Mobile business, our use of cash also included payment for manufacturing and inventory-related costs in the Motorola Mobile business. In addition, uses of cash from operating activities include compensation and related costs, other general corporate expenditures, and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities consist ofincreased from 2014 to 2015 primarily due to increased net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including amortization, depreciation deferred income taxes, excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities,and stock-based compensation expense, as well as the effectand loss on sales of marketable and non-marketable securities. This is partially offset by a net decrease in cash from changes in working capital and other activities.

Cashcapital.


38

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2012 was $16,619 million and consisted ofincreased from 2013 to 2014 primarily due to increased net income adjusted for depreciation and loss on disposal of $10,737 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $5,172 million,property and equipment and stock-based compensation expense, and a gain on divestiture of business of $188 million andnet increase in cash from changes in working capital and other activities of $898 million. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $2,692 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1,988 million of depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment, $974 million of amortization of intangible and other assets, and $188 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities, partially offsetdriven by $266 million of deferred income taxes. In addition, the increase in cash from changes in working capital activities primarily consisted of an increase in income taxes, net, of $1,492 million including additional tax obligations accrued, partially offset by an increase in the amount of estimated income taxes we paid during the year, an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $762 million, a decrease in inventories of $301 million, an increase accrued revenue share of $299 million, and an increase in deferred revenue of $163 million. These changes were partially offset by an increase in prepaid revenue share, expenses, and other assetsassets.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash provided by or used in investing activities primarily consists of $833 million including prepayments for certain content arrangements, an increasepurchases of accounts receivableproperty and equipment, purchases, maturities, and sales of $787 millionmarketable securities in our investment portfolio, investments in reverse repurchase agreements and the cash collateral received or returned from our securities lending program, as well as acquisitions and divestitures of businesses and intangible assets.
Cash used in investing activities increased from 2014 to 2015 primarily due to growthnet increases in fees billedpurchases of marketable securities, activities related to our customers,security lending and purchases of non-marketable investments. This increase was partially offset by lower spend related to acquisitions, lower investments in reverse repurchase agreements, and a decrease in accounts payable of $499 millioncapital expenditures related to our production equipment, data centers, and real estate purchases.
Cash used in investing activities increased from 2013 to 2014 primarily due to the timing of invoice processing and payments.

Cash provided by operating activitiesincreases in 2011 was $14,565 million and consisted of net income of $9,737 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $4,198 million, and increase in cash from changes in working capital and other activities of $630 million. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1,974 million of stock-

based compensation expense, $1,396 million of depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment, $455 million of amortization of intangible and other assets, $343 million of deferred income taxes, and $110

millionexpenditures related to impairmentour production equipment, data centers, and real estate purchases, higher spend related to acquisitions, and lower proceeds received in 2014 from divestiture of equity investments. In addition, thebusinesses compared to 2013. This increase in cash from changes in working capital activities primarily consisted of an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $795 million, a net increase in income taxes payable and deferred income taxes of $731 million, an increase in accrued revenue share of $259 million, an increase of $162 million in deferred revenue, and an increase of $101 million in accounts payable. These increases werewas partially offset by an increasea net decrease in accounts receivablepurchases of $1,156 million due to the growthmarketable securities.

Cash Used in fees billed to our advertisers, and an increaseFinancing Activities
Cash used in prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets of $262 million. The increase in income taxes payable and deferred income taxes reflectedfinancing activities consists primarily additional tax obligations accrued, partially offset by estimated income taxes paid during 2011. In addition, we paid $500 million related to the resolution of a Department of Justice investigation during the year.

Cash provided by operating activities in 2010 was $11,081 million, and consisted of net incomeproceeds or payments from issuance or repayments of $8,505 million, adjustments for non-cash itemsdebt, repurchases of $2,675 million,capital stock, and decrease in cash from changes in working capitalnet proceeds or payments and other activities of $99 million. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1,376 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1,067 million of depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment, and $329 million of amortization of intangible and other assets, partially offset by $94 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities.

In addition,Alphabet, cash used in financing activities increased from 2014 to 2015 primarily driven by the decrease in cash from changes in workingrepurchases of capital activities primarily consisted of an increase of $1,129 million in accounts receivable due to the growth in fees billed to our advertisersstock and an increase of $414 million in prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets. These increases were partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $745 million, an increase in accounts payable of $272 million, an increase in accrued revenue share of $214 million, an increase in deferred revenue of $111 million, and a net increase in income tax payable and deferred income taxes of $102 million, which includes the same $94 million of excess tax benefits frompayments related to stock-based award activities included under adjustments for non-cash items. The increase in accrued expense and other liabilities, accounts payable, accrued revenue share, and deferred revenues are primarily a result of the growth in our business and headcount. The increase in net income taxes payable and deferred income taxes was primarily a result of additional tax obligations accrued, partially offset by the release of certain tax reserves as a result of the settlement of our tax audits for our 2005 and 2006 tax years.

As we expand our business internationally, we have offered payment terms to certain advertisers that are standard in their locales but longer than terms we would generally offer to our domestic advertisers.activities. In addition, we continue to evaluate our Motorola restructuring plan, and may incur additional charges, some of which may be significant. This may increase our working capital requirements and may have a negative effect on cash provided by our operating activities.

Cash Used In Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities in 2012 of $13,056 million was primarily attributable toGoogle, cash used in acquisitions and other investments of $11,264 million, including $9,518 million net cash paid in connection with the acquisition of Motorola, and capital expenditures of $3,273 million related primarily to our facilities, data centers, and related equipment. These decreases were partially offset by net maturities and sales of marketable securities of $1,770 million. Also, in connection with our securities lending program, we returned cash collateral of $334 million. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our securities lending program.

Cash used in investing activities in 2011 of $19,041 million was primarily attributable to net purchases of marketable securities of $12,926 million, capital expenditures of $3,438 million related principally to our facilities, data centers, and related equipment, and cash used in acquisitions and other investments of $2,328 million, including $676 million paid in connection with the acquisition of ITA Software, Inc. Also, in connection with our securities lending program, we returned $354 million of cash collateral.

Cash used in investing activities in 2010 of $10,680 million was primarily attributable to net purchases of marketable securities of $6,886 million, capital expenditures of $4,018 million of which $1.8 billion was for the

purchase of an office building in New York City in December 2010, and remaining amounts related principally to our data centers and related equipment, and cash consideration used in acquisitions and other investments of $1,067 million. Also, in connection with our securities lending program, we received $2,361 million of cash collateral which was invested in reverse repurchase agreements.

In order to manage expected increases in internet traffic, advertising transactions, and new products and services, and to support our overall global business expansion, we expect to make significant investments in our systems, data centers, corporate facilities, information technology infrastructure, and employees in 2013 and thereafter. However, the amount of our capital expenditures has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis.

In addition, we expect to spend a significant amount of cash on acquisitions and other investments from time to time. These acquisitions generally enhance the breadth and depth of our expertise in engineering and other functional areas, our technologies, and our product offerings.

In December 2012, we signed an agreement for the disposition of Motorola Home business for total consideration of approximately $2.35 billion in cash and stock subject to certain adjustments. We expect the transaction to close in 2013.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities in 2012 of $1,229 million wasincreased from 2014 to 2015 is primarily driven by net proceeds of $1,328 million from short-term debt issued under our commercial paper program and excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities of $188 million. This wascapital transactions with Alphabet, partially offset by net payments forrelated to stock-based award activities.

Cash used in financing activities increased from 2013 to 2014 is primarily driven by an increase in net payments related to stock-based award activities, of $287 million.

Cash providedoffset partially by financing activitiesa decrease in 2011 of $807 million was primarily driven by net proceeds of $726 million of debt issued and excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities of $86 million.

Cash provided by financing activities in 2010 of $3,050 million was primarily driven by $3,463 million of net cash proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper and a promissory note. This was partially offset by $801 million in stock repurchases in connection with our acquisitions of AdMob, Inc. and On2 Technologies, Inc., as well as net proceeds from stock-based award activities of $294 million, and excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities of $94 million.

payments related to debt.

Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2012

   Payments due by period 
   Total   Less than
1 year
   1-3
years
   3-5
years
   More than
5 years
 
   (in millions) 

Operating lease obligations, net of sublease income amounts

  $3,619    $466    $870    $688    $1,595  

Purchase obligations

   2,123     942     943     119     119  

Long-term debt obligations

   3,401     70     1,121     1,083     1,127  

Other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet

   236     41     119     40     36  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $9,379    $1,519    $3,053    $1,930    $2,877  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2015

The above table does not include future rental income of $649 million related to the leases that we assumed in connection withfollowing summarizes our building purchases.

Operating Leases

We have entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for certain of our offices, land, and data centers throughout the world with original lease periods expiring primarily between 2013 and 2063. We are committed to pay a portion of the related operating expenses under certain of these lease agreements. These operating expenses are not included in the above table. Certain of these leases have free or escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense under such leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain leases have adjustments for market provisions.

Purchase Obligations

Purchase obligations represent non-cancelable contractual obligations, at December 31, 2012. These contracts are primarily related to distribution arrangements, video and other content licensing revenue sharing arrangements, data centerexcluding open orders for purchases that support normal operations, and facility build-outs, as well as purchase of inventory.

Long-term Debt Obligations

Long-term debt obligations represent principal and interest payments to be made over the life of our unsecured senior notes issued in May 2011. Please see Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities consist of cash obligations, primarily the legal settlement with the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers (AAP), asset retirement obligations, and milestone and royalty payments owed in connection with certain acquisitions and licensing agreements.

In addition to the amounts above, we had long-term taxes payable of $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2012 related to tax positions for which the timing of the ultimate resolution is uncertain. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years beyond 12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes. As a result, this amount is not included in the above table.

2015 (in millions):

 Payments Due By Period
 Total 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3
years
 
3-5
years
 
More than
5 years
Operating lease obligations, net of sublease income amounts(1)
$7,406
 $646
 $1,573
 $1,482
 $3,705
Purchase obligations(2)
1,697
 946
 298
 150
 303
Long-term debt obligations, including capital lease obligations(3)
3,722
 1,306
 140
 140
 2,136
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet(4)
1,580
 356
 430
 367
 427
Total contractual obligations$14,405
 $3,254
 $2,441
 $2,139
 $6,571
(1)
For further information, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)
Purchase obligations represent non-cancelable contractual obligations primarily related to data center operations and facility build-outs, video and other content licensing revenue sharing arrangements, as well as purchases of inventory.
(3)
For further information, refer to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)
Other long-term liabilities represent cash obligations recorded on our consolidated balance sheets, including the short-term portion of these long-term liabilities and consist primarily of payments owed in connection with certain commercial agreements, investments and asset retirement obligations. In addition to the amounts above, we had long-term tax payable of $3.7 billion as of December 31, 2015 primarily related to uncertain tax positions. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years beyond 12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes. As a result, this amount is not included in the above table.

39

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Off-Balance Sheet Entities

AtArrangements

As of December 31, 2012,2015, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues, or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP)Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). In doing so, we have to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In some cases, we could reasonably have used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from our estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations will be affected. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as critical accounting policies and estimates, which we discuss further below. We have reviewed our critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors.

Please see Note 1 of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the summary of significant accounting policies.
Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes.

Although we believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes and the effective tax rate in the period in which such determination is made. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.

Our effective tax rates have differed from the statutory rate primarily due to the tax impact of foreign operations, state taxes, certain benefits realized related to stock-based award activities,interest and research and experimentation tax credits. The effective tax rates were 21.2%, 21.0%, and 19.4% for 2010, 2011, and 2012. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries that have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries that have higher statutory rates, the net gains and losses recognized by legal entities on certain hedges and related hedged intercompany and other transactions under our foreign exchange risk management program, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles, as well as certain discrete items.penalties. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the IRS and other tax authorities.authorities which may assert assessments against us. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations and assessments to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

Loss Contingencies

We are regularly subject to claims, suits, government investigations, and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust, intellectual property, privacy, tax,indirect taxes, labor and employment, commercial disputes, content generated by our users, goods and services offered by advertisers or publishers using our platforms, and other matters. Certain of these matters include speculative claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts of damages. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, we disclose the possible loss in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We evaluate, on a monthly basis, developments in our legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and the matters and related reasonably possible losses disclosed, and make adjustments and changes to our disclosures as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both likelihood of there being and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters. Until the final resolution of such matters, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of the amount recorded, and such amounts could be material. Should any of our estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material impact on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding contingencies.

Business Combinations

We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. When determining the fair values

40

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.

Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to future expected cash flows from customer relationships and acquired patents and developed technology; and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates.

Other estimates associated with the accounting for acquisitions may change as additional information becomes available regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as more fully discussed in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to reporting units expected to benefit from the business combination. We evaluate our reporting units when changes in our operating structure occur, and if necessary, reassign goodwill using a relative fair value allocation approach. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Goodwill impairment tests require judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. As of December 31, 2015, no impairment of goodwill has been identified.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment, long-term prepayments, and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The evaluation is performed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows independent of other assets. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated from the assets are less than their carrying amount. Measurement of an impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset group over its fair value.
Impairment of Marketable and Non-Marketable Securities

We periodically review our marketable and non-marketable securities for impairment. If we conclude that any of these investments are impaired, we determine whether such impairment is other-than-temporary. Factors we consider to make such determination include the duration and severity of the impairment, the reason for the decline in value and the potential recovery period and our intent to sell. For marketable debt securities, we also consider whether (1) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, and (2) the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as a result of credit losses. If any impairment is considered other-than-temporary, we will write down the asset to its fair value and record the corresponding charge as interest and other income (expense), net.

Prior period reclassification

Prior period balance related to inventories has been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Economic Exposure

We transact business globally in various foreign currencies and have significantmultiple currencies. Our international revenues, as well as costs and expenses denominated in foreign currencies. This exposescurrencies, expose us to the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.rates against the U.S. dollar. We purchaseare a net receiver of foreign currencies and therefore benefit from a weakening of the U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. As of December 31, 2015, our most significant currency exposures are the British pound, Euro, and Japanese yen.
We use foreign exchange option contracts to reduce the volatility of cash flows related toprotect our forecasted revenues denominated in certain foreign currencies. The objective of the foreign exchange contracts is to better ensure that the U.S. dollar-equivalent cash flows are not adversely affected byearnings from adverse changes in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rates. These hedging contracts are designatedreduce, but do not entirely eliminate the impact of adverse currency exchange rate movements. We designate these option contracts as cash flow hedges.hedges for accounting purposes.  The gain onfair value of the effective portion of a cash flow hedgeoption contract is initially reportedseparated into its intrinsic and time values. Changes in the time value are recorded in other income (expense), net. Changes in the intrinsic value are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and subsequently reclassified into revenues whento offset the hedged revenues are recorded orexposures as interest and other income, net, if the hedged transaction becomes probable of not occurring. The notional principal of these contracts was approximately $6.5 billion and $9.5 billion as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities of 36 months or less.

they occur.

We considered the historical trends in currency exchange rates and determined that it was reasonably possible that changes in exchange rates of 20% for our foreign currencies instruments could be experienced in the near term. If the U.S. dollar weakened by 20%, as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, the amount recorded in AOCI reflecting intrinsic value related to our

41

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

foreign exchange options before tax effect would have been approximately $132$686 million and $9$280 million lower atas of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, and the total amount of expense recorded as interest and other income (expense), net, would have been approximately $138$90 million and $140$275 million higher in the years ended December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.2015. If the U.S. dollar strengthened by 20%, as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, the amount recorded in accumulated AOCI related to our foreign exchange options before tax effect would have been approximately $1.2$2.5 billion and $1.7$3.1 billion higher atas of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, and the total amount of expense recorded as interest and other income (expense), net, would have been approximately $202$164 million and $159$372 million higher in the years ended December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.

Transaction Exposure

Our exposure2015. In both scenarios, the change in the intrinsic value would be expected to offset a corresponding foreign currency transaction gains and losses is the result of certain net receivables due from ourchange in forecasted hedged revenues when recognized.

In addition, we use foreign subsidiaries and customers being denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiary, primarily the Euro and the British pound. Our foreign subsidiaries conduct their businesses in local currency. We have entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain monetaryour assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the local currency of the subsidiary. These forward contracts reduce, but do not entirely eliminate the impact of currency exchange rate movements on our assets and liabilities. The notional principal of foreign exchange contracts outstanding was $3.7 billioncurrency gains and $6.6 billion at December 31, 2011losses on the assets and December 31, 2012.

liabilities are recorded in other income (expense), net, which are offset by the gains and losses on the forward contracts.

We considered the historical trends in currency exchange rates and determined that it was reasonably possible that adverse changes in exchange rates of 20% for all currencies could be experienced in the near term. These changes would have resulted in an adverse impact on income before income taxes of approximately $27 million and $9 million at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012. The adverse impact at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 is after consideration of the offsetting effect of approximately $503 million and $731 million from foreign exchange contracts in place for the months of December 2011 and December 2012. These reasonably possible adverse changes in exchange rates of 20% were applied to total monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the local currencies at the balance sheet dates to compute the adverse impact these changes would have had on our income before income taxes in the near term.

These changes would have resulted in an adverse impact on income before income taxes of approximately $93 million and $122 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015. The adverse impact as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015 is after consideration of the offsetting effect of approximately $948 million and $1.1 billion from foreign exchange contracts in place for the months of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015.

Interest Rate Risk

Our investment strategy is to achieve a return that will allow us to preserve capital and maintain liquidity requirements. We invest our excess cash primarily in debt securities including those of the U.S. government and its agencies, corporate debt securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, money market and other funds, corporate debtmunicipal securities, mortgage-backedtime deposits, asset backed securities, and debt instruments issued by foreign governments, municipal securities, time deposits, and asset backed securities.governments. By policy, we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

Investments Our investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning securities carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than predicted if interest rates fall. DueAs of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, unrealized losses on our marketable debt securities were primarily due to temporary interest rate fluctuations as a result of higher market interest rates compared to interest rates at the time of purchase. We account for both fixed and variable rate securities at fair value with changes on gains and losses recorded in part to these factors, our income from investments may decrease inAOCI until the future. However, wesecurities are sold. We use certain interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate risk ofgains and losses on our fixed income securities.

During the second quarter of 2012, we began to hedge the variability of forecasted interest payments using forward-starting interest swaps. The total notional amount of these swaps was $1.0 billion These derivative contracts are accounted for as of December 31, 2012,hedges at fair value with terms calling for us to receive interest at a variable rate and to pay interest at a fixed rate. These forward-starting interest swaps effectively fix the benchmark interest rate on an anticipated debt issuance of $1.0 billion in 2014, and they will be terminated upon issuance of the debt.

When entering into forward-starting interest rate swaps, we are subject to market risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value of the forward-starting interest swaps. We manage market risk by matching the terms of the swaps with the critical terms of the expected debt issuance.

recorded in other income (expense), net.

We considered the historical volatility of short-term interest rates and determined that it was reasonably possible that an adverse change of 100 basis points could be experienced in the near term. A hypothetical 1.00% (100 basis points) increase in interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in the fair valuesvalue of our marketable securities of approximately $934 million$1.2 billion and $1.1$1.3 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2012, after taking into consideration the offsetting effect from interest rate derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 20112014 and 2012. A hypothetical 1.00% (100 basis points) decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in the fair values of our forward-starting interest swaps of approximately $107 million at December 31, 2012.

2015.


42

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  
Page

52Financial Statements of Alphabet Inc.: 

Financial Statements:

54

55

56

57

58Financial Statements of Google Inc.: 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.)

59

The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in Item 7 under the caption “Quarterly Results of Operations.”


43

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of GoogleAlphabet Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GoogleAlphabet Inc. as of December 31, 20112014 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012.2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of GoogleAlphabet Inc. atas of December 31, 20112014 and 2012,2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012,2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Alphabet Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
February 11, 2016


44

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Google Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Google Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Google Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Google Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2015, based on criteria established inInternal ControlIntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated January 29, 2013February 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP        
San Jose, California 
February 11, 2016

45

January 29, 2013
Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.


REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of GoogleAlphabet Inc.

We have audited GoogleAlphabet Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). GoogleAlphabet Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Alphabet Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Alphabet Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 of Alphabet Inc. and our report dated February 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
February 11, 2016


46

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Google Inc.
We have audited Google Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Google Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Google Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Google Inc. as of December 31, 20112014 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122015 of Google Inc. and our report dated January 29, 2013February 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP        
San Jose, California 
February 11, 2016

47

January 29, 2013
Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google


Alphabet Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share and par value amounts which are reflected in thousands,

and par value per share amounts)

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2012
 

Assets

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $9,983    $14,778  

Marketable securities

   34,643     33,310  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (including securities loaned of $2,778 and $3,160)

   44,626     48,088  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $133 and $581

   5,427     7,885  

Inventories

   35     505  

Receivable under reverse repurchase agreements

   745     700  

Deferred income taxes, net

   215     1,144  

Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets

   1,710     2,132  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   52,758     60,454  

Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, non-current

   499     2,011  

Non-marketable equity securities

   790     1,469  

Property and equipment, net

   9,603     11,854  

Intangible assets, net

   1,578     7,473  

Goodwill

   7,346     10,537  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $72,574    $93,798  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

  $588    $2,012  

Short-term debt

   1,218     2,549  

Accrued compensation and benefits

   1,818     2,239  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   1,370     3,258  

Accrued revenue share

   1,168     1,471  

Securities lending payable

   2,007     1,673  

Deferred revenue

   547     895  

Income taxes payable, net

   197     240  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   8,913     14,337  

Long-term debt

   2,986     2,988  

Deferred revenue, non-current

   44     100  

Income taxes payable, non-current

   1,693     2,046  

Deferred income taxes, net, non-current

   287     1,872  

Other long-term liabilities

   506     740  

Commitments and contingencies

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, 100,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

   0     0  

Class A and Class B common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value per share: 9,000,000 shares authorized (Class A 6,000,000, Class B 3,000,000) and 12,000,000 shares authorized (Class A 9,000,000, Class B 3,000,000); 324,895 (Class A 257,553, Class B 67,342) and par value of $325 (Class A $258, Class B $67) and 329,979 (Class A 267,448, Class B 62,531) and par value of $330 (Class A $267, Class B $63) shares issued and outstanding

   20,264     22,835  

Class C capital stock, $0.001 par value per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

   0     0  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   276     538  

Retained earnings

   37,605     48,342  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   58,145     71,715  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $72,574    $93,798  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 As of December 31, 2014 As of December 31, 2015
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$18,347
 $16,549
Marketable securities46,048
 56,517
Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (including securities loaned of $4,058 and $4,531)64,395
 73,066
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $225 and $2969,383
 11,556
Receivable under reverse repurchase agreements875
 450
Income taxes receivable, net591
 1,903
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets3,412
 3,139
Total current assets78,656
 90,114
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, non-current3,187
 3,181
Non-marketable investments3,079
 5,183
Deferred income taxes176
 251
Property and equipment, net23,883
 29,016
Intangible assets, net4,607
 3,847
Goodwill15,599
 15,869
Total assets$129,187
 $147,461
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$1,715
 $1,931
Short-term debt2,009
 3,225
Accrued compensation and benefits3,069
 3,539
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities4,408
 4,768
Accrued revenue share1,952
 2,329
Securities lending payable2,778
 2,428
Deferred revenue752
 788
Income taxes payable, net96
 302
Total current liabilities16,779
 19,310
Long-term debt3,228
 1,995
Deferred revenue, non-current104
 151
Income taxes payable, non-current3,340
 3,663
Deferred income taxes758
 189
Other long-term liabilities1,118
 1,822
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 
Stockholders’ equity:   
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, 100,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding0
 0
Class A and Class B common stock, and Class C capital stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value per share: 15,000,000 shares authorized (Class A 9,000,000, Class B 3,000,000, Class C 3,000,000); 680,172 (Class A 286,560, Class B 53,213, Class C 340,399) and par value of $680 (Class A $287, Class B $53, Class C $340) and 687,348 (Class A 292,297, Class B 50,295, Class C 344,756) and par value of $687 (Class A $292, Class B $50, Class C $345) shares issued and outstanding28,767
 32,982
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)27
 (1,874)
Retained earnings75,066
 89,223
Total stockholders’ equity103,860
 120,331
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$129,187
 $147,461
See accompanying notes.


48

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In millions, except per share amounts)

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010   2011   2012 

Revenues:

      

Google (advertising and other)

  $29,321    $37,905    $46,039  

Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0     0     4,136  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $29,321    $37,905    $50,175  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

      

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)(1)

   10,417     13,188     17,176  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)(1)

   0     0     3,458  

Research and development(1)

   3,762     5,162     6,793  

Sales and marketing(1)

   2,799     4,589     6,143  

General and administrative(1)

   1,962     2,724     3,845  

Charge related to the resolution of Department of Justice investigation

   0     500     0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

   18,940     26,163     37,415  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

   10,381     11,742     12,760  

Interest and other income, net

   415     584     626  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   10,796     12,326     13,386  

Provision for income taxes

   2,291     2,589     2,598  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

  $8,505    $9,737    $10,788  

Net loss from discontinued operations

   0     0     (51
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $8,505    $9,737    $10,737  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock—basic:

      

Continuing operations

  $26.69    $30.17    $32.97  

Discontinued operations

   0.00     0.00     (0.16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock—basic

  $26.69    $30.17    $32.81  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share of Class A and Class B common stock—diluted:

      

Continuing operations

  $26.31    $29.76    $32.46  

Discontinued operations

   0.00     0.00     (0.15
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock—diluted

  $26.31    $29.76    $32.31  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)       Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:

      

Cost of revenues—Google (advertising and other)

  $67    $249    $359  

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile (hardware and other)

   0     0     14  

Research and development

   861     1,061     1,325  

Sales and marketing

   261     361     498  

General and administrative

   187     303     453  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,376    $1,974    $2,649  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of revenues21,993
 25,691
 28,164
Research and development7,137
 9,832
 12,282
Sales and marketing6,554
 8,131
 9,047
General and administrative4,432
 5,851
 6,136
Total costs and expenses40,116
 49,505
 55,629
Income from operations15,403
 16,496
 19,360
Other income (expense), net496
 763
 291
Income from continuing operations before income taxes15,899
 17,259
 19,651
Provision for income taxes2,739
 3,639
 3,303
Net income from continuing operations$13,160
 $13,620
 $16,348
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations(427) 516
 0
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Less: Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0
 0
 522
Net income available to all stockholders$12,733
 $14,136
 $15,826
      
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:     
Continuing operations$19.77
 $20.15
 $23.11
Discontinued operations(0.64) 0.76
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class A and B common stock$19.13
 $20.91
 $23.11
      
Basic net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:     
Continuing operations$19.77
 $20.15
 $24.63
Discontinued operations(0.64) 0.76
 0.00
Basic net income per share of Class C capital stock$19.13
 $20.91
 $24.63
      
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A and B common stock:     
Continuing operations$19.42
 $19.82
 $22.84
Discontinued operations(0.63) 0.75
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class A and B common stock$18.79
 $20.57
 $22.84
      
Diluted net income (loss) per share of Class C capital stock:     
Continuing operations$19.42
 $19.82
 $24.34
Discontinued operations(0.63) 0.75
 0.00
Diluted net income per share of Class C capital stock$18.79
 $20.57
 $24.34
See accompanying notes.


49

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Net income

  $8,505   $9,737   $10,737  

Other comprehensive income:

    

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

   (124  (107  75  

Available-for-sale investments:

    

Change in net unrealized gains

   232    348    493  

Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

   (151  (115  (216
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change (net of tax effect of $52, $54, $68)

   81    233    277  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

    

Change in unrealized gains

   196    39    47  

Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

   (120  (27  (137
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change (net of tax effect of $52, $2, $53)

   76    12    (90
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

   33    138    262  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

  $8,538   $9,875   $10,999  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment89
 (996) (1,067)
Available-for-sale investments:     
Change in net unrealized gains (losses)(392) 505
 (715)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income(162) (134) 208
Net change (net of tax effect of $212, $60, and $29)(554) 371
 (507)
Cash flow hedges:     
Change in net unrealized gains112
 651
 676
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income(60) (124) (1,003)
Net change (net of tax effect of $30, $196, and $115)52

527
 (327)
Other comprehensive loss(413) (98) (1,901)
Comprehensive income$12,320
 $14,038
 $14,447
See accompanying notes.


50

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In millions, except for share amounts which are reflected in thousands)

   Class A and Class B
Common Stock and
Additional Paid-In Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
       Shares          Amount        

Balance at January 1, 2010

   317,772   $15,817   $105   $20,082   $36,004  

Common stock issued

   5,126    1,412    0    0    1,412  

Common stock repurchased

   (1,597  (82  0    (719  (801

Stock-based compensation expense

    1,376    0    0    1,376  

Stock-based compensation tax benefits

    72    0    0    72  

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

    (360  0    0    (360

Net income

    0    0    8,505    8,505  

Other comprehensive income

    0    33    0    33  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   321,301    18,235    138    27,868    46,241  

Common stock issued

   3,594    621    0    0    621  

Stock-based compensation expense

    1,974    0    0    1,974  

Stock-based compensation tax benefits

    60    0    0    60  

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

    (626  0    0    (626

Net income

    0    0    9,737    9,737  

Other comprehensive income

    0    138    0    138  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

   324,895    20,264    276    37,605    58,145  

Common stock issued

   5,084    736    0    0    736  

Stock-based compensation expense

    2,692    0    0    2,692  

Stock-based compensation tax benefits

    166    0    0    166  

Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units

    (1,023  0    0    (1,023

Net income

    0    0    10,737    10,737  

Other comprehensive income

    0    262    0    262  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   329,979   $22,835   $538   $48,342   $71,715  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 
Class A and Class B
Common Stock, Class C Capital Stock and
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 Shares     Amount     
Balance as of December 31, 2012659,958
 $22,835
 $538
 $48,197
 $71,570
Common stock issued11,706
 1,174
 0
 0
 1,174
Stock-based compensation expense  3,343
 0
 0
 3,343
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  449
 0
 0
 449
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (1,879) 0
 0
 (1,879)
Net income  0
 0
 12,733
 12,733
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (413) 0
 (413)
Balance as of December 31, 2013671,664
 25,922
 125
 60,930
 86,977
Common and capital stock issued8,508
 465
 0
 0
 465
Stock-based compensation expense  4,279
 0
 0
 4,279
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  625
 0
 0
 625
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (2,524) 0
 0
 (2,524)
Net income  0
 0
 14,136
 14,136
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (98) 0
 (98)
Balance as of December 31, 2014680,172
 28,767
 27
 75,066
 103,860
Common and capital stock issued8,714
 664
 0
 0
 664
Stock-based compensation expense  5,151
 0
 0
 5,151
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  815
 0
 0
 815
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (2,779) 0
 0
 (2,779)
Repurchases of capital stock(2,391) (111) 0
 (1,669) (1,780)
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders853
 475
 0
 (522) (47)
Net income  0
 0
 16,348
 16,348
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (1,901) 0
 (1,901)
Balance as of December 31, 2015687,348
 $32,982
 $(1,874) $89,223
 $120,331
See accompanying notes.


51

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Operating activities

    

Net income

  $8,505   $9,737   $10,737  

Adjustments:

    

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment

   1,067    1,396    1,988  

Amortization of intangible and other assets

   329    455    974  

Stock-based compensation expense

   1,376    1,974    2,692  

Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities

   (94  (86  (188

Deferred income taxes

   9    343    (266

Impairment of equity investments

   0    110    0  

Gain on divestiture of business

   0    0    (188

Other

   (12  6    (28

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

   (1,129  (1,156  (787

Income taxes, net

   102    731    1,492  

Inventories

   0    (30  301  

Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets

   (414  (232  (833

Accounts payable

   272    101    (499

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   745    795    762  

Accrued revenue share

   214    259    299  

Deferred revenue

   111    162    163  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   11,081    14,565    16,619  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

    

Purchases of property and equipment

   (4,018  (3,438  (3,273

Purchases of marketable securities

   (43,985  (61,672  (33,410

Maturities and sales of marketable securities

   37,099    48,746    35,180  

Investments in non-marketable equity securities

   (320  (428  (696

Cash collateral related to securities lending

   2,361    (354  (334

Investments in reverse repurchase agreements

   (750  5    45  

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired and proceeds received from divestiture, and purchases of intangible and other assets

   (1,067  (1,900  (10,568
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (10,680  (19,041  (13,056
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

    

Net proceeds (payments) from stock-based award activities

   294    (5  (287

Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities

   94    86    188  

Repurchase of common stock in connection with acquisitions

   (801  0    0  

Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of costs

   5,246    10,905    16,109  

Repayment of debt

   (1,783  (10,179  (14,781
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   3,050    807    1,229  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (19  22    3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   3,432    (3,647  4,795  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   10,198    13,630    9,983  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $13,630   $9,983   $14,778  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

    

Cash paid for interest

  $0   $40   $74  

Cash paid for taxes

  $2,175   $1,471   $2,034  

Non-cash financing activity:

    

Fair value of stock-based awards assumed in connection with acquisitions

  $750   $0   $41  

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Operating activities     
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Adjustments:     
Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment2,781
 3,523
 4,132
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets1,158
 1,456
 931
Stock-based compensation expense3,343
 4,279
 5,203
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities(481) (648) (548)
Deferred income taxes(437) (104) (179)
Gain on divestiture of business(700) (740) 0
(Gain) loss on marketable and non-marketable investments, net(166) (390) 334
Other272
 192
 212
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable(1,307) (1,641) (2,094)
Income taxes, net588
 591
 (179)
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets(930) 459
 (318)
Accounts payable605
 436
 203
Accrued expenses and other liabilities713
 757
 1,597
Accrued revenue share254
 245
 339
Deferred revenue233
 (175) 43
Net cash provided by operating activities18,659
 22,376
 26,024
Investing activities     
Purchases of property and equipment(7,358) (10,959) (9,915)
Purchases of marketable securities(45,444) (56,310) (74,368)
Maturities and sales of marketable securities38,314
 51,315
 62,905
Purchases of non-marketable investments(569) (1,227) (2,172)
Cash collateral related to securities lending(299) 1,403
 (350)
Investments in reverse repurchase agreements600
 (775) 425
Proceeds from divestiture of business2,525
 386
 0
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and purchases of intangibles and other assets(1,448) (4,888) (236)
Net cash used in investing activities(13,679)
(21,055) (23,711)
Financing activities     
Net payments related to stock-based award activities(781) (2,069) (2,375)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities481
 648
 548
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0
 0
 (47)
Repurchases of capital stock0
 0
 (1,780)
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of costs10,768
 11,625
 13,705
Repayments of debt(11,325) (11,643) (13,728)
Net cash used in financing activities(857) (1,439) (3,677)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(3) (433) (434)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents4,120
 (551) (1,798)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period14,778
 18,898
 18,347
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$18,898
 $18,347
 $16,549
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid for taxes$1,932
 $2,819
 $3,338
Cash paid for interest72
 86
 96
See accompanying notes.


52

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.



Google Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and par value amounts which are reflected in thousands,
and par value per share amounts)
 As of December 31, 2014 As of December 31, 2015
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$18,347
 $16,549
Marketable securities46,048
 56,517
Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities (including securities loaned of $4,058 and $4,531)64,395
 73,066
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $225 and $2969,383
 11,556
Receivable under reverse repurchase agreements875
 450
Income taxes receivable, net591
 1,903
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets3,412
 3,139
Total current assets78,656
 90,114
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, non-current3,187
 3,181
Non-marketable investments3,079
 5,183
Deferred income taxes176
 251
Property and equipment, net23,883
 29,016
Intangible assets, net4,607
 3,847
Goodwill15,599
 15,869
Total assets$129,187
 $147,461
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$1,715
 $1,931
Short-term debt2,009
 3,225
Accrued compensation and benefits3,069
 3,539
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities4,408
 4,768
Accrued revenue share1,952
 2,329
Securities lending payable2,778
 2,428
Deferred revenue752
 788
Income taxes payable, net96
 302
Total current liabilities16,779
 19,310
Long-term debt3,228
 1,995
Deferred revenue, non-current104
 151
Income taxes payable, non-current3,340
 3,663
Deferred income taxes758
 189
Other long-term liabilities1,118
 1,822
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 
Stockholders’ equity:   
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 100,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding; 0.5 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding0
 0
Class A and Class B common stock, and Class C capital stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value per share: 15,000,000 shares authorized (Class A 9,000,000, Class B 3,000,000, Class C 3,000,000); 680,172 (Class A 286,560, Class B 53,213, Class C 340,399), and par value of $680 (Class A $287, Class B $53, Class C $340); and 1.5 shares authorized (Class A 0.5, Class B 0.5, Class C 0.5); 0.3 (Class A 0.1, Class B 0.1, Class C 0.1), and par value of $0, shares issued and outstanding28,767
 31,313
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)27
 (1,874)
Retained earnings75,066
 90,892
Total stockholders’ equity103,860
 120,331
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$129,187
 $147,461
See accompanying notes.

53

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of revenues21,993
 25,691
 28,164
Research and development7,137
 9,832
 12,282
Sales and marketing6,554
 8,131
 9,047
General and administrative4,432
 5,851
 6,136
Total costs and expenses40,116
 49,505
 55,629
Income from operations15,403
 16,496
 19,360
Other income (expense), net496
 763
 291
Income from continuing operations before income taxes15,899
 17,259
 19,651
Provision for income taxes2,739
 3,639
 3,303
Net income from continuing operations$13,160
 $13,620
 $16,348
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations(427) 516
 0
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Less: Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0
 0
 522
Net income available to all stockholders$12,733
 $14,136
 $15,826
See accompanying notes.

54

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment89
 (996) (1,067)
Available-for-sale investments:     
Change in net unrealized gains (losses)(392) 505
 (715)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income(162) (134) 208
Net change (net of tax effect of $212, $60, and $29)(554) 371
 (507)
Cash flow hedges:     
Change in net unrealized gains112
 651
 676
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income(60) (124) (1,003)
Net change (net of tax effect of $30, $196, and $115)52
 527
 (327)
Other comprehensive loss(413) (98) (1,901)
Comprehensive income$12,320
 $14,038
 $14,447
See accompanying notes.

55

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions, except share amounts which are reflected in thousands)
 
Class A and Class B
Common Stock, Class C Capital Stock and
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 Shares     Amount     
Balance as of December 31, 2012659,958
 $22,835
 $538
 $48,197
 $71,570
Common stock issued11,706
 1,174
 0
 0
 1,174
Stock-based compensation expense  3,343
 0
 0
 3,343
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  449
 0
 0
 449
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (1,879) 0
 0
 (1,879)
Net income  0
 0
 12,733
 12,733
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (413) 0
 (413)
Balance as of December 31, 2013671,664
 25,922
 125
 60,930
 86,977
Common and capital stock issued8,508
 465
 0
 0
 465
Stock-based compensation expense  4,279
 0
 0
 4,279
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  625
 0
 0
 625
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (2,524) 0
 0
 (2,524)
Net income  0
 0
 14,136
 14,136
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (98) 0
 (98)
Balance as of December 31, 2014680,172
 28,767
 27
 75,066
 103,860
Common and capital stock issued6,659
 331
 0
 0
 331
Stock-based compensation expense  5,151
 0
 0
 5,151
Stock-based compensation tax benefits  815
 0
 0
 815
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units  (1,954) 0
 0
 (1,954)
Alphabet share exchange(687,684) 0
 0
 0
 0
Capital transactions with Alphabet  (2,272) 0
 0
 (2,272)
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders853
 475
 0
 (522) (47)
Net income  0
 0
 16,348
 16,348
Other comprehensive loss  0
 (1,901) 0
 (1,901)
Balance as of December 31, 20150
 $31,313
 $(1,874) $90,892
 $120,331
See accompanying notes.

56

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Operating activities     
Net income$12,733
 $14,136
 $16,348
Adjustments:     
Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment2,781
 3,523
 4,132
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets1,158
 1,456
 931
Stock-based compensation expense3,343
 4,279
 5,203
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities(481) (648) (548)
Deferred income taxes(437) (104) (179)
Gain on divestiture of business(700) (740) 0
(Gain) loss on marketable and non-marketable investments, net(166) (390) 334
Other272
 192
 212
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
 
 
Accounts receivable(1,307) (1,641) (2,094)
Income taxes, net588
 591
 (179)
Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets(930) 459
 (318)
Accounts payable605
 436
 203
Accrued expenses and other liabilities713
 757
 1,597
Accrued revenue share254
 245
 339
Deferred revenue233
 (175) 43
Net cash provided by operating activities18,659
 22,376
 26,024
Investing activities
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment(7,358) (10,959) (9,915)
Purchases of marketable securities(45,444) (56,310) (74,368)
Maturities and sales of marketable securities38,314
 51,315
 62,905
Purchases of non-marketable investments(569) (1,227) (2,172)
Cash collateral related to securities lending(299) 1,403
 (350)
Investments in reverse repurchase agreements600
 (775) 425
Proceeds from divestiture of business2,525
 386
 0
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and purchases of intangibles and other assets(1,448) (4,888) (236)
Net cash used in investing activities(13,679) (21,055) (23,711)
Financing activities
 
 
Net payments related to stock-based award activities(781) (2,069) (1,612)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities481
 648
 548
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders0
 0
 (47)
Capital transactions with Alphabet0
 0
 (2,543)
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of costs10,768
 11,625
 13,705
Repayments of debt(11,325) (11,643) (13,728)
Net cash used in financing activities(857) (1,439) (3,677)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(3) (433) (434)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents4,120
 (551) (1,798)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period14,778
 18,898
 18,347
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$18,898
 $18,347
 $16,549
 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid for taxes$1,932
 $2,819
 $3,338
Cash paid for interest72
 86
 96
See accompanying notes.

57

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Google Inc.Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

We were incorporated in California in September 1998. We were1998 and re-incorporated in the State of Delaware in August 2003. We generate revenues primarily by delivering relevant, cost-effective online advertising in our Google segment. In addition, as a result of our acquisitionadvertising.
On April 17, 2013, we sold the Motorola Home business (Motorola Home) to Arris Group, Inc. (Arris). The financial results of Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. (Motorola) on May 22, 2012, we generate revenues from sales of mobile devices in our Motorola Mobile (Mobile) segment and digital set-top boxes in our Motorola Home (Home) segment. In December 2012, we entered into an agreement to dispose Home, and the related financial results are presented as net lossincome (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income. AssetsIncome for the year ended December 31, 2013. See Note 9 for further discussion of the sale.
On April 2, 2014, we completed a two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend (the Stock Split). All references made to share or per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and applicable disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Stock Split. See Note 12 for additional information about the Stock Split.
On October 29, 2014, we sold the Motorola Mobile business (Motorola Mobile) to Lenovo Group Limited (Lenovo). The financial results of Motorola Mobile are presented as net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. See Note 9 for further discussion of the sale.
On August 10, 2015, we announced plans to create a new public holding company, Alphabet Inc. (Alphabet), and a new operating structure. On October 2, 2015, we implemented the holding company reorganization, and as a result, Alphabet became the successor issuer to Google Inc. (Google).
The implementation of the holding company reorganization on October 2, 2015 was accounted for as a merger under common control. Alphabet has recognized the assets and liabilities of Motorola Home are not presented as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets because they are not material.

Basis of Consolidation

Google at carryover basis. The consolidated financial statements of Alphabet present comparative information for prior years on a combined basis, as if both Alphabet and Google were under common control for all periods presented.

The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are being presented in a combined report being filed by two separate registrants: Alphabet and Google. The Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are the only statements with differences between Alphabet and Google.  The differences relate to transactions between Alphabet and Google which are accounted for as capital transactions. Refer to Note 13 for additional information.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Alphabet and Google include the accounts of Alphabet and Google, Inc.respectively, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.all wholly owned subsidiaries as well as all variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, inventory valuations, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.


58

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Revenue Recognition

The following table presents our revenues by segment and revenue source (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010   2011   2012 

Google:

      

Advertising revenues:

      

Google websites

  $19,444    $26,145    $31,221  

Google Network Members’ websites

   8,792     10,386     12,465  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total advertising revenues

   28,236     36,531     43,686  

Other revenues

   1,085     1,374     2,353  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Google revenues (advertising and other)

   29,321     37,905     46,039  

Motorola Mobile:

      

Total Motorola Mobile revenues (hardware and other)

   0     0     4,136  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $29,321    $37,905    $50,175  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Google segment     
Google websites$37,422
 $45,085
 $52,357
Google Network Members' websites (1)
13,650
 14,539
 15,033
Google advertising revenues51,072
 59,624
 67,390
Google other revenues (1)
4,435
 6,050
 7,151
Google segment revenues$55,507
 $65,674
 $74,541
      
Other Bets     
Other Bets revenues$12
 $327
 $448
      
Consolidated revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
(1)
Prior period amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification primarily related to DoubleClick ad serving software revenues from Google other revenues to Advertising Revenues from Google Network Members' websites to conform with current period presentation.
We recognizegenerate revenues primarily by delivering performance and brand advertising. Performance advertising creates and delivers relevant ads that users will click, leading to direct engagement with advertisers. Brand advertising enhances users’ awareness of and affinity with advertisers’ products and services, through videos, text, images, and other ads that run across various devices.
Google AdWords is our auction-based advertising program that enables performance advertisers to place text-based and display ads on Google websites and our Google Network Members’ websites. Google AdSense refers to the online programs through which we distribute our advertisers’ AdWords ads for display on our Google Network Members’ websites. Most of our customers pay us on a cost-per-click basis, which means that an advertiser pays us only when a user engages with the ads by clicking on an ad on Google websites or Google Network Members' websites or by viewing YouTube engagement ads like TrueView (counted as an engagement when the user chooses not to skip the ad). We also offer advertising on a cost-per-impression basis that enables our brand advertisers to pay us based on the number of times their ads display on Google websites and our Google Network Members’ websites as specified by the advertisers.
Revenue from advertising is recognized when the services or products have been provided or delivered, the fees we charge are fixed or determinable, we and our advertisers or other customers understand the specific nature and terms of the agreed upon transactions, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Google

Google AdWords is our auction-based advertising program that enables advertisers to place text-based and display ads on our websites and our Google Network Members’ websites. Display advertising comprises the videos, text, images, and other interactive ads that run across the web on computers and mobile devices, including smart phones and handheld computers such as netbooks and tablets. Most of our customers pay us on a cost-per-click basis, which means that an advertiser pays us only when a user clicks on one of its ads. We also offer advertising on a cost-per-impression basis that enables advertisers to pay us based on the number of times their ads display on our websites and our Google Network Members’ websites as specified by the advertisers.

Google AdSense refers to the online programs through which we distribute our advertisers’ AdWords ads for display on our Google Network Members’ websites.

We recognize as revenues the fees charged to advertisers each time a user clicks on one of the ads that appears next to the search results or content on ourGoogle websites or our Google Network Members’ websites. For those advertisers using our cost-per-impression pricing, we recognize as revenues the fees charged to advertisers each time their ads are displayed on ourGoogle websites or our Google Network Members’ websites. We report our Google AdSense revenues and traffic acquisition costs due to our Google Network Members on a gross basis principally because we are the primary obligor to our advertisers.

We record deferred revenues upon invoicing or when cash payments are received in advance of our performance in the underlying agreement on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Motorola

For

Revenue from hardware product sales where we sell directly to end customers or through distribution channels revenue recognitionis generally occursrecognized when products have been shipped, risk of loss has transferred to the customer, objective evidence exists that customer acceptance provisions have been met, no significant obligations remain and allowances for discounts, price protection, returns and customer incentives can be reasonably and reliably estimated. Recorded revenuesRevenues are reduced byreported net of these allowances. Where these allowances cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated, we recognize revenue at the time the product sells through the distribution channel to the end customer.

customer or when the return period elapsed, as applicable.

For the sale of certain third-party products and services, we evaluate whether it is appropriate to recognize revenue based on the gross amount billed to the customers or the net amount earned as revenue share. Generally, when we record revenue on a gross basis, we are the primary obligor in a transaction, and have also considered other factors, including whether we are subject to inventory risk or have latitude in establishing prices.
For multi-element arrangements, that include multiple deliverables, primarily for productsincluding those that contain software essential to the hardware products’ functionality and services, we allocate revenue to each unit of accounting based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling prices to be used for allocating revenue: (i) vendor-specific objective

59

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

evidence of fair value (VSOE), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price, and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (ESP). VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by us for that deliverable. ESPs reflect our best estimates of what the selling pricesprice of elementsthe deliverable would be if they wereit was sold regularly on a stand-alone basis.

Revenues from Home

We record deferred revenues when cash payments are includedreceived in net loss from discontinued operations.

advance of our performance in the underlying agreement on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Cost of Revenues

Google

Cost of revenues consists primarily of traffic acquisition costs. Traffic acquisition costs consist ofwhich are the advertising revenues shared with our Google Network Members and the amounts ultimately paid to our Google Network members under AdSense arrangements and to certain otherdistribution partners (our distribution partners) who distribute our toolbar and other products (collectively referred to as access points)browser or

otherwise direct search queries to our website (collectively referred to as distribution arrangements). These amounts are primarily based on the revenue share and fixed fee arrangements with our Google Network Members and distribution partners.

Certain distribution arrangements require us to pay our partners based on a fee per access point delivered and not exclusively—or at all—based on revenue share. These fees are non-refundable. Further, these arrangements are terminable at will, although under the terms of certain contracts we or our distribution partners may be subject to penalties in the event of early termination. We recognize fees under these arrangements over the estimated useful lives of the access points (approximately two years) to the extent we can reasonably estimate those lives and they are longer than one year, or based on any contractual revenue share, if greater. Otherwise, the fees are charged to expense as incurred. The estimated useful life of the access points is based on the historical average period of time they generate traffic and revenues. Further, we review the access points for impairment by distribution partner, type, and geography, and we have not made any impairment to date.

Costwebsite.

Additionally, other costs of revenues also includes the following:
The expenses associated with the operation of our data centers including(including depreciation, labor, energy, and bandwidth costs);
Content acquisition costs creditprimarily related to payments to certain content providers from whom we license their video and other content for distribution on YouTube and Google Play (we share most of the fees these sales generate with content providers or pay a fixed fee to these content providers);
Credit card and other transaction fees related to processing customer transactions, amortization of acquired intangible assets, as well as content acquisition costs. We have entered into arrangements with certain content providers under which we distribute or license their video and other content. In a number of these arrangements, we display ads on the pages of our web sites from which the content is viewed and share most of the fees these ads generate with the content providers. To the extent we are obligated to make guaranteed minimum revenuetransactions;
Stock-based compensation expense;
Revenue share payments to our content providers,mobile carriers;
Inventory costs for hardware we recognize as content acquisition costs the contractual revenue share amount or the minimum guarantee on a straight-line basis, whichever is greater, over the termssell; and
Amortization of the agreements.

Prepaid revenue share and distribution fees are included in prepaid revenue share, expenses, and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Motorola

Cost of revenues from our Motorola business related to delivered hardware, including estimated warranty costs, are recognized at the time of sale. Cost of revenues from Home are included in net loss from discontinued operations.

certain intangible assets.

Stock-based Compensation

We have elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options on the dates of grant.

Restricted stock units (RSUs) are measured based on the fair market valuesvalue of the underlying stock on the datesdate of grant. Shares are issued on the vesting dates net of the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements to be paid by us on behalf of our employees. As a result, the actual number of shares issued will be fewer than the actual number of RSUs outstanding. Furthermore, weWe record the liability for withholding amounts to be paid by us primarily as a reduction to additional paid-in capital when paid. Also,
For stock option awards, we determined fair value using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model on the date of grant.
Stock-based compensation includes awards we expect to settle in Alphabet stock as well as awards we will ultimately settle in cash. We recognize stock-based compensation, less an estimate for forfeitures, using the straight-line method.

method over the requisite service period. Additionally, stock-based compensation for liability classified awards reflect changes in fair value during the requisite service period.

We include as part of cash flows from financing activities the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the tax-effected compensation of the related stock-based awards for options exercised and RSUs vested during the period. During the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011,2013, 2014, and December 31, 2012,2015, the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $656$1,174 million, $621$465 million, and $736$393 million, respectively.
We have elected to account for the indirect effects of stock-based awards -- primarily the research and development tax credit -- through the totalConsolidated Statements of Income. Total direct tax benefit realized, including the excess tax benefit, from stock-based award activities was $355 million, $451 million, and $747 million. We have elected to account for the indirect effects of stock-based awards—primarily the research and development tax credit—through the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Forduring the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011,2013, 2014, and December 31, 2012, we recognized stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefits of $1,3762015, was $1,195 million, $1,356 million, and $314$1,544 million, $1,974 million and $413 million, and $2,649 million and $591 million. Additionally, net loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefits of $43 million and $11 million.

respectively.

Certain Risks and Concentrations

Our revenues are primarily derived from online advertising, the market for which is highly competitive and rapidly changing. In addition, our revenues are generated from a multitude of vertical market segments in countries around the world. Significant changes in this industry or changes in customer buying or advertiser spending behavior could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, for our Motorola business, nearly all of our Motorola products (other than some prototypes)
We are manufactured outside the U.S., primarily in China, Taiwan and Brazil.

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally offrom cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, foreign exchange contracts, and accounts receivable. Cash equivalents and marketable securities consist primarily of time deposits, money market and other funds, including cash collateral received related to our securities lending program, highly liquid debt instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies, debt instruments issued by foreign governments and municipalities in the U.S., corporate securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. Foreign exchange contracts are transacted with various financial institutions with high credit standing.


60

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenues earned from customers located around the world. In 2010, 2011,2013, 2014, and 2012,2015, we generated approximately 48%46%, 46%45%, and 47%46% of our revenues from customers based in the U.S., with the majority of revenues from customers outside of the U.S. located in Europe and Japan. Many of our Google Network Members are in the internet industry. We perform ongoing evaluations to determine customer credit and we limit the amount of credit we extend, but generally we do not require collateral from our customers. We maintain reserves for estimated credit losses and these losses have generally been within our expectations.

No individual customer or groups of affiliated customers represented more than 10% of our revenues in 2010, 2011, and 2012.

2013, 2014, or 2015.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial assets and financial liabilities that include cash equivalents, marketable securities, and foreign currency and interest rate derivative contracts, and non-marketable debt securities are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. We measure certain otherfinancial assets including our non-marketable equity securities at fair value for disclosure purposes, as well as, on a nonrecurring basis when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Our other current financial assets and our other current financial liabilities have fair values that approximate their carrying value.
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. Assets and are therefore notliabilities recorded at fair value are measured and classified in accordance with a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the observability of the inputs available in the market used to measure fair value:
Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 - Include other inputs that are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and credit ratings.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activities.
The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities

We invest ourall excess cash primarily in time deposits, money market and other funds,debt securities including cash collateral received related to our securities lending program, highly liquid debt instrumentsthose of the U.S. government and its agencies, corporate debt securities, agency mortgage-backed securities, money market and other funds, municipal securities, time deposits, asset backed securities, and debt instruments issued by foreign governments and municipalities in the U.S., corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities.

governments.

We classify all highly liquid investments withthat are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have stated maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase as cash equivalents and all highly liquid investmentsthose with stated maturities of greater than three months as marketable securities.

We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluate such designation at each balance sheet date. We have classified and accounted for our marketable securities as available-for-sale. We may or may not hold securities with stated maturities greater than 12 months until maturity. After consideration of our risk versus reward objectives, as well as our liquidity requirements, we may sell these securities prior to their stated maturities. As we view these securities as available to support current operations, we classify highly liquid securities with maturities beyond 12 months as current assets under the caption marketable securities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We carry these securities at fair value, and report the unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, as a component of stockholders’ equity, except for unrealized losses determined to be other-than-temporary, which we record as interest andwithin other income (expense), net. We determine any realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities on a specific identification method, and we record such gains and losses as a component of interest and other income (expense), net.

Non-Marketable Equity Securities

Investments

We have accounted for non-marketable equity securitiesinvestments either under the equity or cost method. Investments through which we exercise significant influence but do not have control over the investee are accounted for under the equity method. Investments through which we are not able to exercise significant influence over the investee are accounted for under the cost method.


61

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

We have accounted for our non-marketable investments that meet the definition of a debt security as available-for-sale securities. Since these securities do not have contractual maturity dates and we do not intend to liquidate them in the next 12 months, we have classified them as non-current assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Variable Interest Entities
We make a determination at the start of each arrangement whether an entity in which we have made an investment is considered a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). We consolidate VIEs in which we have a controlling financial interest. If we do not have a controlling financial interest in a VIE, we account for the investment under either the equity or cost method.
Impairment of Marketable and Non-Marketable Securities

Investments

We periodically review our marketable and non-marketable securitiesinvestments for impairment. If we conclude that any of these investments are impaired, we determine whether such impairment is other-than-temporary. Factors we consider to make such determination include the duration and severity of the impairment, the reason for the decline in value and the potential recovery period and our intent to sell. For marketable debt securities, we also consider whether (1) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, and (2) the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as a result of credit losses. If any impairment is considered other-than-temporary, we will write down the asset to its fair value and record the corresponding charge as interest and other income (expense), net.

Accounts Receivable

We record accounts receivable at the invoiced amount and we normally do not charge interest. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially uncollectible receivables. We review the accounts receivable by amounts due by customers which are past due to identify specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues. In determining the amount of the reserve, we make judgments about the creditworthiness of significant customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. We also maintain a sales allowance to reserve for potential credits issued to customers. We determine the amount of the reserve based on historical credits issued.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, computed using the first-in, first-out method.

Property and Equipment

We account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally two to five years. We depreciate buildings over periods up to 25 years. We amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Construction in progress is related to the construction or development of property (including land) and equipment that have not yet been placed in service for our intended use. Depreciation for equipment commences once it is placed in service and depreciation for buildings and leasehold improvements commences once they are ready for our intended use. Land is not depreciated.

Software Development Costs

We expense software development costs, including costs to develop software products or the software component of products to be marketed to external users, before technological feasibility of such products is reached. We have determined that technologicalTechnological feasibility wasis typically reached shortly before the release of thosesuch products and as a result, the development costs incurred afterthat meet the establishment of technological feasibility and before the release of those productscriteria for capitalization were not material and accordingly, were expensed as incurred. for the periods presented.
Software development costs also include costs to develop software programs to be used solely to meet internal needs and cloud based applications used to deliver our internal needs. Theservices. We capitalize development costs we incurred during the application development stage forrelated to these software programsapplications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Costs capitalized for developing such software applications were not material infor the yearsperiods presented.

Business Combinations

We include the results of operations of the businesses that we acquire as of the respective dates of acquisition. We allocate the fair value of the purchase price of our acquisitions to the tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired, based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of the purchase price over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill.

Long-Lived Assets Including Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

We review property and equipment, long-term prepayments and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be

62

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

recoverable. We measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows that the assets or the asset group are expected to generate. If property and equipment and intangiblethe assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value. In 2014, we recorded impairments of intangible assets, including an impairment of $378 million in the third quarter of 2014 related to a patent licensing royalty asset. Impairments of intangible assets were not material in 2015.
We have made no material adjustmentsallocate goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the business combination. We evaluate our long-lived assetsreporting units when changes in any of the years presented. In addition, weour operating structure occur, and if necessary, reassign goodwill using a relative fair value allocation approach. We test our goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that thisthe asset may be impaired. We found noNo goodwill impairment has been identified in any of the years presented.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We amortize our acquired intangible assets on a straight-line basis with definite lives over periods ranging from one to 12twelve years.

Income Taxes

We recognizeaccount for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which we recognize the liability method. We recognizeamount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred income taxes for differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the yearsfuture tax consequences of events that have been recognized in which differences are expectedour financial statements or tax returns. We measure current and deferred tax assets and liabilities based on provisions of enacted tax law. We evaluate the realization of our deferred tax assets based on all available evidence and establish a valuation allowance to reverse. reduce deferred tax assets when it is more-likely-than-not that they will not be realized.
We recognize the effect on deferred taxesfinancial statement effects of a change in tax rates in incomeposition when it is more-likely-than not that, based on technical merits, the position will be sustained upon examination. The tax benefits of the position recognized in the periodfinancial statements are then measured based on the largest amount of benefit that includesis greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with a taxing authority. In addition, we recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the enactment date.

income tax provision.

Foreign Currency

Generally, the functional currency of our international subsidiaries is the local currency. We translate the financial statements of these subsidiaries to U.S. dollars using month-end exchange rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates offor the annual period derived from month-end exchange rates for revenues, costs, and expenses. We record translation gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. We recorded $124 million ofreflect net translation losses in 2010, $107 million of net translation losses in 2011, and $75 million of net translation gains in 2012. We record netforeign exchange transaction gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactionsthe conversion of the transaction currency to functional currency as a component of foreign currency exchange losses in interest and other income (expense), net. These gains and losses are net of those recognized on foreign exchange contracts. We recorded $29 million of net losses in 2010, $38 million of net losses in 2011, and $78 million of net losses in 2012.

Advertising and Promotional Expenses

We expense advertising and promotional costs in the period in which they are incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 20112013, 2014 and 2012,2015, advertising and promotional expenses totaled approximately $772$2,389 million, $1,544$3,004 million, and $2,332$3,186 million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09) "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)”, and requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. As currently issued and amended, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, though early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements, implementing accounting system changes related to the adoption, and considering additional disclosure requirements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10 (ASU 2014-10) "Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation." ASU 2014-10 removes the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities. The additional elimination of related consolidation guidance will require companies with interests in development stage entities to reassess whether such entities are variable interest entities under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. We will adopt this standard in the first quarter

63

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

of 2016 on a retrospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02) "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis." ASU 2015-02 changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. We will adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2016 on a retrospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations or consolidated balance sheet, but it may result in additional disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 (ASU 2015-17) “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”.  ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by eliminating the separate classification of deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheet statement of financial position. The amendments in the update require that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. We have early adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of 2015 on a retrospective basis. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted.  
As a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-17, the Company made the following adjustments to the 2014 balance sheet: a $1,322 million decrease to current deferred tax assets, a $83 million increase to noncurrent deferred tax asset, a $26 million decrease to current deferred tax liability, and a decrease of $1,213 million to noncurrent deferred tax liability.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 (ASU 2016-01) "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." ASU 2016-01 amends various aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure for financial instruments. With respect to our consolidated financial statements, the most significant impact relates to the accounting for equity investments. It will impact the disclosure and presentation of financial assets and liabilities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption by public entities is permitted only for certain provisions. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015 in the cumulative amount of $711 million. We evaluated the materiality of the income tax expense impact quantitatively and qualitatively and concluded it was not material to any of the prior periods impacted and that correction of income tax expense as an out of period adjustment in the quarter ended June 30, 2015 would not be material to our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2015. Consolidated revenues are not impacted. We elected to revise previously issued consolidated financial statements for the periods impacted. Refer to Note 17 for additional information.
Prior Period Reclassification

Prior period balance related to inventories hasReclassifications

Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to thewith current yearperiod presentation.

Note 2.    Net Income Per Share of Class A and Class B Common Stock

We compute net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock using the two-class method. Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and the effect of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, warrants issued under the TSO program, and restricted stock units. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, warrants, and restricted stock units is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The computation of the diluted net income per share of Class A common stock assumes the conversion of Class B common stock, while the diluted net income per share of Class B common stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.

The rights, including the liquidation and dividend rights, of the holders of our Class A and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting. Further, there are a number of safeguards built into our certificate of incorporation, as well as Delaware law, which preclude our board of directors from declaring or paying unequal per share dividends on our Class A and Class B common stock. Specifically, Delaware law provides that amendments to our certificate of incorporation which would have the effect of adversely altering the rights, powers, or preferences of a given class of stock (in this case the right of our Class A common stock to receive an equal dividend to any declared on our Class B common stock) must be approved by the class of stock adversely affected by the proposed amendment. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that before any such amendment may be put to a stockholder vote, it must be approved by the unanimous consent of our board of directors. As a result, the undistributed earnings for each year are allocated based on the contractual participation rights of the Class A and Class B common shares as if the earnings for the year had been distributed. As the liquidation and dividend rights are identical, the undistributed earnings are allocated on a proportionate basis. Further, as we assume the conversion of Class B common stock in the computation of the diluted net income per share of Class A common stock, the undistributed earnings are equal to net income for that computation.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock (in millions, except share amounts which are reflected in thousands and per share amounts):

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2011  2012 
  Class A  Class B  Class A  Class B  Class A  Class B 

Basic net income (loss) per share:

      

Numerator

      

Allocation of undistributed earnings—continuing operations

 $6,569   $1,936   $7,658   $2,079   $8,641   $2,147  

Allocation of undistributed earnings—discontinued operations

  0    0    0    0    (41  (10

Total

 $6,569   $1,936   $7,658   $2,079   $8,600   $2,137  

Denominator

      

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

  246,168    72,534    253,862    68,916    262,078    65,135  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Number of shares used in per share computation

  246,168    72,534    253,862    68,916    262,078    65,135  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

      

Continuing operations

 $26.69   $26.69   $30.17   $30.17   $32.97   $32.97  

Discontinued operations

  0    0    0    0    (0.16  (0.16
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic net income per share

 $26.69   $26.69   $30.17   $30.17   $32.81   $32.81  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted net income per share:

      

Numerator

      

Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation—continuing operations

 $6,569   $1,936   $7,658   $2,079   $8,641   $2,147  

Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares

  1,936    0    2,079    0    2,147    0  

Reallocation of undistributed earnings to Class B shares

  0    (26  0    (27  0    (31
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allocation of undistributed earnings—continuing operations

 $8,505   $1,910   $9,737   $2,052   $10,788   $2,116  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation—discontinued operations

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $(41 $(10

Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares

  0    0    0    0    (10  0  

Reallocation of undistributed earnings to Class B shares

  0    0    0    0    0    0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allocation of undistributed earnings—discontinued operations

 $0   $0   $0   $0   $(51 $(10
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Denominator

      

Number of shares used in basic computation

  246,168    72,534    253,862    68,916    262,078    65,135  

Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities

      

Add:

      

Conversion of Class B to Class A common shares outstanding

  72,534    0    68,916    0    65,135    0  

Employee stock options, including warrants issued under Transferable Stock Option program

  3,410    71    2,958    46    2,944    34  

Restricted stock units

  1,139    0    1,478    0    2,148    0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Number of shares used in per share computation

  323,251    72,605    327,214    68,962    332,305    65,169  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share:

      

Continuing operations

  26.31    26.31    29.76    29.76    32.46    32.46  

Discontinued operations

  0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    (0.15  (0.15
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted net income per share

 $26.31   $26.31   $29.76   $29.76   $32.31   $32.31  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The net income per share amounts are the same for Class A and Class B common stock because the holders of each class are legally entitled to equal per share distributions whether through dividends or in liquidation.

Note 3.2. Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

We measure our cash equivalents, marketable securities, and foreign currency and interest rate derivative contracts at fair value. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:

Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2—Include other inputs that are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and credit ratings.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activities.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

Based on the fair value hierarchy, we classify our cash equivalents and marketable securities within Level 1 or Level 2. This is2 in the fair value hierarchy because we value our cash equivalents and marketable securities usinguse quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs.inputs to determine their fair value. We classify our foreign currency and interest rate derivative contracts primarily within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities

The following tables summarize our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities measured at adjusted cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value by significant investment categories as of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20122015 (in millions):

   As of December 31, 2011 
   Adjusted
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
   Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
   Marketable
Securities
 

Cash

  $4,712    $0    $0   $4,712    $4,712    $0  

Level 1:

           

Money market and other funds

   3,202     0     0    3,202     3,202     0  

U.S. government notes

   11,475     104     0    11,579     0     11,579  

Marketable equity securities

   228     79     0    307     0     307  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   14,905     183     0    15,088     3,202     11,886  

Level 2:

           

Time deposits

   1,029     0     0    1,029     534     495  

Money market and other funds(1)

   1,260     0     0    1,260 ��   1,260     0  

U.S. government agencies

   6,486     15     0    6,501     275     6,226  

Foreign government bonds

   1,608     32     (11  1,629     0     1,629  

Municipal securities

   1,775     19     0    1,794     0     1,794  

Corporate debt securities

   6,023     187     (98  6,112     0     6,112  

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

   6,359     147     (5  6,501     0     6,501  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   24,540     400     (114  24,826     2,069     22,757  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $44,157    $583    $(114 $44,626    $9,983    $34,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 2012 
   Adjusted
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
   Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
   Marketable
Securities
 

Cash

  $8,066    $0    $0   $8,066    $8,066    $0  

Level 1:

           

Money market and other funds

   5,221     0     0    5,221     5,221     0  

U.S. government notes

   10,853     77     (1  10,929     0     10,929  

Marketable equity securities

   12     88     0    100     0     100  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   16,086     165     (1  16,250     5,221     11,029  

Level 2:

           

Time deposits

   984     0     0    984     562     422  

Money market and other funds(1)

   929     0     0    929     929     0  

U.S. government agencies

   1,882     20     0    1,902     0     1,902  

Foreign government bonds

   1,996     81     (3  2,074     0     2,074  

Municipal securities

   2,249     23     (6  2,266     0     2,266  

Corporate debt securities

   7,200     414     (14  7,600     0     7,600  

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

   7,039     136     (6  7,169     0     7,169  

Asset-backed securities

   847     1     0    848     0     848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   23,126     675     (29  23,772     1,491     22,281  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $47,278    $840    $(30 $48,088    $14,778    $33,310  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 


64

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

  As of December 31, 2014
  
Adjusted
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
 Marketable
Securities
Cash $9,863
 $0
 $0
 $9,863
 $9,863
 $0
Level 1:            
Money market and other funds 2,532
 0
 0
 2,532
 2,532
 0
U.S. government notes 15,320
 37
 (4) 15,353
 1,128
 14,225
Marketable equity securities 988
 428
 (64) 1,352
 0
 1,352
  18,840
 465
 (68) 19,237
 3,660
 15,577
Level 2:            
Time deposits(1)
 2,409
 0
 0
 2,409
 2,309
 100
Money market and other funds(2)
 1,762
 0
 0
 1,762
 1,762
 0
Fixed-income bond funds(3)
 385
 0
 (38) 347
 0
 347
U.S. government agencies 2,327
 8
 (1) 2,334
 750
 1,584
Foreign government bonds 1,828
 22
 (10) 1,840
 0
 1,840
Municipal securities 3,370
 33
 (6) 3,397
 3
 3,394
Corporate debt securities 11,499
 114
 (122) 11,491
 0
 11,491
Agency mortgage-backed securities 8,196
 109
 (42) 8,263
 0
 8,263
Asset-backed securities 3,456
 1
 (5) 3,452
 0
 3,452
  35,232
 287
 (224) 35,295
 4,824
 30,471
Total $63,935
 $752
 $(292) $64,395
 $18,347
 $46,048
  As of December 31, 2015
  
Adjusted
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 
Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
 Marketable
Securities
Cash $7,380
 $0
 $0
 $7,380
 $7,380
 $0
Level 1:            
Money market and other funds 5,623
 0
 0
 5,623
 5,623
 0
U.S. government notes 20,922
 27
 (48) 20,901
 258
 20,643
Marketable equity securities 692
 155
 0
 847
 0
 847
  27,237
 182
 (48) 27,371
 5,881
 21,490
Level 2:            
Time deposits(1)
 3,223
 0
 0
 3,223
 2,012
 1,211
Money market and other funds(2)
 1,140
 0
 0
 1,140
 1,140
 0
Fixed-income bond funds(3)
 219
 0
 0
 219
 0
 219
U.S. government agencies 1,367
 2
 (3) 1,366
 0
 1,366
Foreign government bonds 2,242
 14
 (23) 2,233
 0
 2,233
Municipal securities 3,812
 47
 (4) 3,855
 0
 3,855
Corporate debt securities 13,809
 53
 (278) 13,584
 136
 13,448
Agency mortgage-backed securities 9,680
 48
 (57) 9,671
 0
 9,671
Asset-backed securities 3,032
 0
 (8) 3,024
 0
 3,024
  38,524
 164
 (373) 38,315
 3,288
 35,027
Total $73,141
 $346
 $(421) $73,066
 $16,549
 $56,517
(1) 

The majority of our time deposits are foreign deposits.

(2)
The balances atas of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20122015 were related to cash collateral received in connection with our securities lending program, which was invested in reverse repurchase agreements maturing within three months. See section titled "Securities Lending Program" below for further discussion onof this program.

(3)
Fixed-income bond funds consist of mutual funds that primarily invest in corporate and government bonds.

We determine realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities on a specific identification method. We recognized gross realized gains of $381$416 million, $238 million, and $383$357 million for the years ended December 31, 2011

65

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

2013, 2014, and December 31, 2012.2015. We recognized gross realized losses of $127$258 million, $85 million, and $101$565 million for the years ended December 31, 20112013, 2014, and December 31, 2012. In 2011, we also recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $88 million related to our investment in Clearwire Corporation.2015. We reflect these gains and losses as a component of interest and other income (expense), net, in ourthe accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of our investments in marketable debt securities, excluding marketable equity securities, designatedaccounted for as available-for-sale securities and classified by the contractual maturity date of the securities (in millions):

   As of
December 31,
2012
 

Due in 1 year

  $4,708  

Due in 1 year through 5 years

   12,310  

Due in 5 years through 10 years

   7,296  

Due after 10 years

   8,896  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $33,210  
  

 

 

 

 As of December 31, 2015
Due in 1 year$7,900
Due in 1 year through 5 years30,141
Due in 5 years through 10 years7,199
Due after 10 years10,211
Total$55,451
The following tables present gross unrealized losses and fair values for those investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position (in millions):

  As of December 31, 2011 
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
 

Foreign government bonds

 $302   $(11 $6   $0   $308   $(11

Corporate debt securities

  2,160    (97  17    (1  2,177    (98

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  716    (3  19    (2  735    (5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $3,178   $(111 $42   $(3 $3,220   $(114
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  As of December 31, 2012 
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Loss
 

U.S. government notes

 $842   $(1 $0   $0   $842   $(1

Foreign government bonds

  509    (2  12    (1  521    (3

Municipal securities

  686    (6  9    0    695    (6

Corporate debt securities

  820    (10  81    (4  901    (14

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  1,300    (6  0    0    1,300    (6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $4,157   $(25 $102   $(5 $4,259   $(30
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  As of December 31, 2014
  Less than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
  Fair Value Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value Unrealized
Loss
U.S. government notes $4,490
 $(4) $0
 $0
 $4,490
 $(4)
U.S. government agencies 830
 (1) 0
 0
 830
 (1)
Foreign government bonds 255
 (7) 43
 (3) 298
 (10)
Municipal securities 877
 (3) 174
 (3) 1,051
 (6)
Corporate debt securities 5,851
 (112) 225
 (10) 6,076
 (122)
Agency mortgage-backed securities 609
 (1) 2,168
 (41) 2,777
 (42)
Asset-backed securities 2,388
 (4) 174
 (1) 2,562
 (5)
Fixed-income bond funds 347
 (38) 0
 0
 347
 (38)
Marketable equity securities 690
 (64) 0
 0
 690
 (64)
Total $16,337
 $(234) $2,784
 $(58) $19,121
 $(292)
  As of December 31, 2015
  Less than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
  Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value Unrealized
Loss
U.S. government notes $13,757
 $(48) $0
 $0
 $13,757
 $(48)
U.S. government agencies 864
 (3) 0
 0
 864
 (3)
Foreign government bonds 885
 (18) 36
 (5) 921
 (23)
Municipal securities 1,116
 (3) 41
 (1) 1,157
 (4)
Corporate debt securities 9,192
 (202) 784
 (76) 9,976
 (278)
Agency mortgage-backed securities 5,783
 (34) 721
 (23) 6,504
 (57)
Asset-backed securities 2,508
 (7) 386
 (1) 2,894
 (8)
Total $34,105
 $(315) $1,968
 $(106) $36,073
 $(421)
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, we did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment loss. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized $281 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses related to our marketable equity securities and fixed-income bond funds. Those losses are included in gains (losses) on marketable securities, net as a component of other income (expense), net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 10 for further details on other income (expense), net.
Securities Lending Program


66

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

From time to time, we enter into securities lending agreements with financial institutions to enhance investment income. We loan selectedcertain securities which are secured by collateralcollateralized in the form of cash or securities. Cash collateral is usually invested in reverse repurchase agreements. agreements which are collateralized in the form of securities.
We classify loaned securities as cash equivalents or marketable securities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Weand record the cash collateral as an asset with a corresponding liability.liability in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We classify reverse repurchase agreements maturing within three months as cash equivalents and those longer than three months as receivable under reverse repurchase agreements onin the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. For lending agreements collateralized by securities,security collateral received, we do not record an asset or liability except in the event of counterparty default.
Our securities lending transactions were accounted for as we are not permitted to sell or repledge the associated collateral.

secured borrowings with significant investment categories as follows (in millions):

 As of December 31, 2015
 Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
Securities Lending TransactionsOvernight and Continuous Up to 30 days 30 - 90 Days Greater Than 90 Days Total
U.S. government notes$1,322
 $31
 $0
 $306
 $1,659
U.S. government agencies504
 77
 0
 0
 581
Corporate debt securities188
 0
 0
 0
 188
Total$2,014
 $108
 $0
 $306
 $2,428
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending in offsetting disclosure $2,428
Amounts related to agreements not included in securities lending in offsetting disclosure $0
Derivative Financial Instruments

We recognize derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. We record changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income as other income (expense), net, as part of revenues, or as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, as discussed below.
We enter into foreign currency contracts with financial institutions to reduce the risk that our cash flows and earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We use certain interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate exposures on our fixed income securities and our anticipated debt issuance.debt. Our program is not designatedused for trading or speculative purposes.

We enter into master netting arrangements, which reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same company.counterparty. To further reduce credit risk, we enter into collateral security arrangements thatunder which the counterparty is required to provide for collateral to be received when the net fair value of certain financial instruments fluctuates from contractually established thresholds. We present our derivative assets and derivative liabilities at their gross fair values. At can take possession of the collateral in the event of counterparty default. As of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, we received cash collateral related to the derivative instruments under our collateral security arrangements of $113$268 million and $43 million, which are recorded as accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We recognize derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. We record changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income as interest and other income, net, as part of revenues, or to accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

$192 million.

Cash Flow Hedges

We use options designated as cash flow hedges to hedge certain forecasted revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The notional principal of these contracts was approximately $6.5$13.6 billion and $9.5$16.4 billion as of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.2015. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities of 36 months or less.

During the second quarter of

In 2012, we began to hedge the variability of forecasted interest payments on an anticipated debt issuance usingentered into forward-starting interest swaps. Therate swaps with a total notional amount of these forward-starting interest swaps was $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2012 withand terms calling for us to receive interest at a variable rate and to pay interest at a fixed rate. These forward-starting interest swapsrate, that effectively fix the benchmarklocked in an interest rate on anour anticipated debt issuance of $1.0 billion in 2014. We issued $1.0 billion of unsecured senior notes in February 2014 and they will be(See details in Note 4). As a result, we terminated the forward-starting interest rate swaps upon issuancethe debt issuance. The cash gain associated with the termination is reported within Operating Activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2014, consistent with the impact of the debt.

hedged item.

We initially report anyreflect gain or loss on the effective portion of a cash flow hedge as a component of AOCI and subsequently reclassify cumulative gains and losses to revenues or interest expense when the hedged transactions are recorded. If the hedged transactions become probable of not occurring, the corresponding amounts in AOCI would be immediately reclassified to interest and other income (expense), net. Further, we exclude the change in the time value of the options from our

67

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

assessment of hedge effectiveness. We record the premium paid or time value of an option on the date of purchase as an asset. Thereafter, we recognize any changechanges to this time value in interest and other income (expense), net.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, the effective portion of our cash flow hedges before tax effect was $11 million, $10$375 million, of which $293 million is expected to be reclassified from AOCI to revenuesinto earnings within the next 12 months.

Fair Value Hedges

We use forward contracts designated as fair value hedges to hedge foreign currency risks for our investments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in interest and other income, net, along with the offsetting losses and gains of the related hedged items. We exclude changes in the time value for forward contracts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognize them in interest and other income, net.effectiveness. The notional principal of these contracts was $1.0$1.5 billion and $1.1$1.8 billion as of December 31, 20112014 and 2015.
We use interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges to hedge interest rate risk for certain fixed rate securities. The notional principal of these contracts was $175 million and $295 million as of December 31, 2012.

2014 and 2015.

Gains and losses on these forward contracts and interest rate swaps are recognized in other income (expense), net, along with the offsetting losses and gains of the related hedged items.
Other Derivatives

Other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments consist of forward and option contracts that we use to hedge intercompany transactions and other monetary assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the local currency of a subsidiary. We recognize gains and losses on these contracts, as well as the related costs in interest and other income (expense), net, along with the foreign currency gains and losses of the related hedged items.on monetary assets and liabilities. The notional principal of foreign exchange contracts outstanding was $3.7$6.2 billion and $6.6$7.5 billion at as of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.

2015.

We also use exchange-traded interest rate futures contracts and “To Be Announced” (TBA) forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed assets to hedge interest rate risks on certain fixed income securities. The TBA contracts meet the definition of derivative instruments in cases where physical delivery of the assets is not taken at the earliest available delivery date. Our interest rate futures and TBA contracts (together interest rate contracts) are not designated as hedging instruments. We recognize gains and losses on these contracts, as well as the related costs, in interest and other income (expense), net. The gains and losses are generally economically offset by unrealized gains and losses in the underlying available-for-sale securities, which are recorded as a component of AOCI until the securities are sold or other-than-temporarily impaired, at which time the amounts are moved from AOCI into interest and other income (expense), net. The total notional amounts of interest rate contracts outstanding were $100$150 million and $25$50 million at as of December 31, 20112014 and December, 31, 2012.

2015.


68

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The fair values of our outstanding derivative instruments were as follows (in millions):

    As of December 31, 2011    
  

Balance Sheet Location

 Fair Value of
Derivatives
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
  Fair Value of
Derivatives Not
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
  Total Fair
Value
 

Derivative Assets:

    

Level 2:

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current $333   $4   $337  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities:

    

Level 2:

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities $5   $1   $6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

    As of December 31, 2012    
   

Balance Sheet Location

 Fair Value of
Derivatives
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
  Fair Value of
Derivatives Not
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
  Total Fair
Value
 

Derivative Assets:

    

Level 2:

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current $164   $13   $177  

Interest rate contracts

 Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current  1    0    1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $165   $13   $178  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities:

    

Level 2:

    

Foreign exchange contracts

 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities $3   $4   $7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

    As of December 31, 2014
  
 Balance Sheet Location Fair Value of
Derivatives
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 Fair Value of
Derivatives Not
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 Total Fair
Value
Derivative Assets:        
Level 2:        
Foreign exchange contracts Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current $851
 $0
 $851
Interest rate contracts Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current 1
 0
 1
Total   $852
 $0
 $852
Derivative Liabilities:        
Level 2:        
Foreign exchange contracts Accrued expenses and other current liabilities $0
 $3
 $3
Interest rate contracts Accrued expenses and other liabilities, current and non-current 1
 0
 1
Total   $1
 $3
 $4
    As of December 31, 2015
  
 Balance Sheet Location Fair Value of
Derivatives
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 Fair Value of
Derivatives Not
Designated as
Hedging Instruments
 Total Fair
Value
Derivative Assets:        
Level 2:        
Foreign exchange contracts Prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, current and non-current $626
 $2
 $628
Total   $626
 $2
 $628
Derivative Liabilities:        
Level 2:        
Foreign exchange contracts Accrued expenses and other current liabilities $1
 $13
 $14
Interest rate contracts Accrued expenses and other liabilities, current and non-current 2
 0
 2
Total   $3
 $13
 $16

69

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on income and other comprehensive income (OCI) is summarized below (in millions):

   Gains Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives Before Tax Effect (Effective  Portion)
 
   Year Ended December 31, 

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

          2010                   2011                   2012         

Foreign exchange contracts

  $331    $54    $73  

Interest rate contracts

   0     0     1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $331    $54    $74  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Gains Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) 
      Year Ended December 31, 

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

  Location  2010   2011   2012 

Foreign exchange contracts

  Revenues  $203    $43    $217  

   Losses Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Amount
Excluded from  Effectiveness Testing and Ineffective Portion)(1)
 
      Year Ended December 31, 

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

  Location        2010              2011              2012       

Foreign exchange contracts

  Interest and
other income, net
  $(320 $(323 $(447

  
Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI
on Derivatives Before Tax Effect (Effective Portion)
  Year Ended December 31,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship 2013 2014 2015
Foreign exchange contracts $92
 $929
 $964
Interest rate contracts 86
 (31) 0
Total $178
 $898
 $964
  Gains Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)
    Year Ended December 31,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship Location 2013 2014 2015
Foreign exchange contracts Revenues $95
 $171
 $1,399
Interest rate contracts Other income (expense), net 0
 4
 5
Total   $95
 $175
 $1,404
  
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Amount
Excluded from  Effectiveness Testing and Ineffective Portion) (1)
    Year Ended December 31,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship Location 2013 2014 2015
Foreign exchange contracts Other income (expense), net $(280) $(279) $(297)
Interest rate contracts Other income (expense), net 0
 4
 0
Total   $(280) $(275) $(297)
(1) 

Gains (losses) related to the ineffective portion of the hedges were not material in all periods presented.

The effect of derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships on income is summarized below (in millions):

   Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivatives(2) 
      Year Ended December 31, 

Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationship

  Location      2010          2011          2012     

Foreign exchange contracts

  Interest and
other income, net
  $(35 $(2 $(31

Hedged item

  Interest and
other income, net
   29    (12  23  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    $(6 $(14 $(8
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivatives(2)
    Year Ended December 31,
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationship Location 2013 2014 2015
Foreign Exchange Hedges:        
Foreign exchange contracts Other income (expense), net $16
 $115
 $170
Hedged item Other income (expense), net (25) (123) (176)
Total   $(9) $(8) $(6)
Interest Rate Hedges:        
Interest rate contracts Other income (expense), net $0
 $0
 $(2)
Hedged item Other income (expense), net 0
 0
 2
Total   $0
 $0
 $0
(2) 

Losses related to the amount excluded from effectiveness testing of the hedges were $6$9 million, $14$8 million, and $8$6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011,2013, 2014, and December 31, 2012.

2015.


70

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on income is summarized below (in millions):

   Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivatives 
      Year Ended December 31, 

Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments

  Location      2010          2011          2012     

Foreign exchange contracts

  Interest and
other income, net
  $(40 $29   $(67

Interest rate contracts

  Interest and
other income, net
   0    (19  (6
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    $(40 $10   $(73
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
    Year Ended December 31,
Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments Location 2013 2014 2015
Foreign exchange contracts Other income (expense), net, and net loss from discontinued operations $118
 $237
 $198
Interest rate contracts Other income (expense), net 4
 2
 1
Total   $122
 $239
 $199
Offsetting of Derivatives, Securities Lending, and Reverse Repurchase Agreements
We present our derivatives, securities lending and reverse repurchase agreements at gross fair values in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, our master netting and other similar arrangements allow net settlements under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, information related to these offsetting arrangements was as follows (in millions):
Offsetting of Assets             
 As of December 31, 2014
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but Have Legal Rights to Offset  
DescriptionGross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments  Cash Collateral Received Non-Cash Collateral Received Net Assets Exposed
Derivatives$852
 $0
 $852
 $(1)
(1) 
$(251) $(412) $188
Reverse repurchase agreements2,637
 0
 2,637
(2) 
0
 0
 (2,637) 0
Total$3,489
 $0
 $3,489
 $(1) $(251) $(3,049) $188
              
 As of December 31, 2015
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but Have Legal Rights to Offset  
DescriptionGross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Non-Cash Collateral Received Net Assets Exposed
Derivatives$628
 $0
 $628
 $(13)
(1) 
$(189) $(214) $212
Reverse repurchase agreements1,590
 0
 1,590
(2) 
0
 0
 (1,590) 0
Total$2,218
 $0
 $2,218
 $(13) $(189) $(1,804) $212
(1)
The balances as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 were related to derivative liabilities which are allowed to be net settled against derivative assets in accordance with our master netting agreements.
(2)
The balances as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 included $1,762 million and $1,140 million recorded in cash and cash equivalents, respectively, and $875 million and $450 million recorded in receivable under reverse repurchase agreements, respectively.

71

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Offsetting of Liabilities             
 As of December 31, 2014
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but Have Legal Rights to Offset  
DescriptionGross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments  Cash Collateral Pledged Non-Cash Collateral Pledged Net Liabilities
Derivatives$4
 $0
 $4
 $(1)
(3) 
$0
 $0
 $3
Securities lending agreements2,778
 0
 2,778
 0
 0
 (2,740) 38
Total$2,782
 $0
 $2,782
 $(1) $0
 $(2,740) $41
              
 As of December 31, 2015
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but Have Legal Rights to Offset 
DescriptionGross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments  Cash Collateral Pledged Non-Cash Collateral Pledged Net Liabilities
Derivatives$16
 $0
 $16
 $(13)
(3) 
$(3) $0
 $0
Securities lending agreements2,428
 0
 2,428
 0
 0
 (2,401) 27
Total$2,444
 $0
 $2,444
 $(13) $(3) $(2,401) $27
(3)
The balances as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 were related to derivative assets which are allowed to be net settled against derivative liabilities in accordance with our master netting agreements.
Note 3. Non-Marketable Investments
Our non-marketable investments include non-marketable equity investments and non-marketable debt securities.
Non-Marketable Equity Investments
Our non-marketable equity investments are investments we have made in privately-held companies accounted for under the equity or cost method and are not required to be consolidated under the variable interest or voting models. As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, these investments accounted for under the equity method had a carrying value of approximately $1.3 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, and those investments accounted for under the cost method had a carrying value of $1.8 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. For investments accounted for under the cost method, the fair value was approximately $7.5 billion as of December 31, 2015. The fair value of the cost method investments are primarily determined from data leveraging private-market transactions and are classified within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. We periodically review our non-marketable equity investments for impairment. No material impairments were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015. Our share of gains and losses in equity method investments for the year ended December 31, 2015 was a net loss of approximately $227 million and not material for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. We reflect these losses as a component of other income (expense), net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
We determined that certain renewable energy investments included in our non-marketable equity investments are VIEs. However, we do not consolidate these entities in our financial statements because we do not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and account for those investments under the equity method. Our involvement with investments in renewable energy relate to our equity investments in entities whose activities involve power generation. We have determined that the governance structures of these entities do not allow us to direct the activities that would significantly impact the entity's economic performance such as setting operating budgets. The carrying value of our renewable energy investments accounted for under the equity method that are VIEs is $302 million as of December 31, 2015 with the maximum exposure of $316 million. The maximum exposure is based on current investments to date plus future funding commitments.  We have determined the single source of our exposure to these VIE’s is our capital investment in these entities. We periodically reassess whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The reassessment process considers whether we have acquired the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE through changes in governing documents or other circumstances. We also reconsider whether entities previously determined not to be VIEs have become VIEs, based on changes in facts and circumstances including changes in contractual arrangements and capital structure.

72

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Non-Marketable Debt Securities
Our non-marketable debt securities are primarily preferred stock that are redeemable at our option and convertible notes issued by private companies. These debt securities do not have readily determinable market values and are categorized accordingly as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. To estimate the fair value of these securities, we use a combination of valuation methodologies, including market and income approaches based on prior transaction prices; estimated timing, probability, and amount of cash flows; and illiquidity considerations. Financial information of private companies may not be available and consequently we will estimate the value based on the best available information at the measurement date. We estimate a range of fair values based on valuation approaches noted above and as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the fair value recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for individual investments is within the range. No material impairments were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015.
The following table presents a reconciliation for our assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions):
 Level 3
Balance as of December 31, 2014$90
Purchases, issuances, and settlements(1)
934
Balance as of December 31, 2015$1,024
(1)
Purchases of securities included our $900 million investment in SpaceX, a space exploration and space transport company, made during January 2015.
Note 4. Debt

Short-Term Debt

We have a debt financing program of up to $3.0 billion through the issuance of commercial paper. Net proceeds from this program are used for general corporate purposes. AtAs of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, we had $750 million and $2.5$2.0 billion of outstanding commercial paper recorded as short-term debt with a weighted-average interest ratesrate of 0.1% and 0.2%., respectively. In conjunction with this program, we have a $3.0 billion revolving credit facility expiring in July 2016. The interest rate for the credit facility is determined based on a formula using certain market rates. AtAs of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012,2015, we were in compliance with the financial covenant in the credit facility, and no amounts were outstanding under the credit facility at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2011, we had a $468 million secured promissory note outstanding recorded as short-term debt, with an interest rate of 1.0% that matured2014 and was paid in December 2012.

2015. The estimated fair value of the short-term debt approximated its carrying value atas of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.

2015.


73

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Long-Term Debt

In May 2011, we

We issued $1.0 billion of unsecured senior notes (the "2014 Notes") in February 2014 and $3.0 billion of unsecured senior notes in three tranches as described in the table below (collectively, the Notes)"2011 Notes") in May 2011. We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2011 Notes to repay a portion of our outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes. We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2014 Notes for the repayment of the portion of the principal amount of our 2011 Notes which matured on May 19, 2014 and for general corporate purposes. The total outstanding Notes are summarized below (in millions):

   Outstanding
Balance
as of
December 31,
2011
  Outstanding
Balance
as of
December 31,
2012
 

1.25% Notes due on May 19, 2014

  $1,000   $1,000  

2.125% Notes due on May 19, 2016

   1,000    1,000  

3.625% Notes due on May 19, 2021

   1,000    1,000  

Unamortized discount for the Notes above

   (14  (12
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $2,986   $2,988  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 As of
December 31, 2014
 As of
December 31, 2015
Short-Term Portion of Long-Term Debt   
2.125% Notes due on May 19, 2016$0
 $1,000
Capital Lease Obligation10
 225
Total Short-Term Portion of Long-Term Debt$10
 $1,225
    
Long-Term Debt   
2.125% Notes due on May 19, 2016$1,000
 $0
3.625% Notes due on May 19, 20211,000
 1,000
3.375% Notes due on February 25, 20241,000
 1,000
Unamortized discount for the Notes above(8) (5)
Subtotal2,992
 1,995
Capital Lease Obligation236
 0
Total Long-Term Debt$3,228
 $1,995
The effective interest yields of the 2014,Notes due in 2016, 2021, and 2021 Notes2024 were 1.258%2.241%, 2.241%3.734%, and 3.734%3.377%, respectively. Interest on the 2011 and 2014 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 19semi-annually. The 2011 and November 192014 Notes rank equally with each other and with all of each year.our other senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time outstanding. We may redeem the 2011 and 2014 Notes at any time in whole or from time to time in part at specified redemption prices. We are not subject to any financial covenants under the Notes. We used2011 Notes or the net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes for general corporate purposes.2014 Notes. The total estimated fair value of the 2011 and 2014 Notes was approximately $3.2$3.1 billion at both December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2012.2015. The fair value of the outstanding 2011 and 2014 Notes was determined based on observable market prices of identical instruments in less active markets that are not active and wasis categorized accordingly as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

At

In August 2013, we entered into a capital lease obligation on certain property expiring in 2028. We intend to exercise the option to purchase the property in 2016, and as such the long term portion of the capital lease obligation was reclassified as short term. The effective rate of the capital lease obligation approximates the market rate. The estimated fair value of the capital lease obligation approximated its carrying value as of December 31, 2012,2014 and 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, aggregate future principal payments for the Noteslong-term debt (including short-term portion of long-term debt) and capital lease obligation were as follows (in millions):

Years ending

    

2013

   0  

2014

   1,000  

2015

   0  

2016

   1,000  

Thereafter

   1,000  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $3,000  
  

 

 

 
Years Ending  
2016 $1,225
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
Thereafter 2,000
Total $3,225
In January 2016, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to issue up to $5.0 billion of commercial paper from time to time and to enter into a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility to replace Google's existing $3.0 billion revolving credit facility. 

74

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Note 5. Balance Sheet Components

Inventories

Inventories

Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in millions):

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2012
 

Raw materials and work in process

  $0    $77  

Finished goods

   35     428  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Inventories

  $35    $505  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 As of December 31, 2014 As of December 31, 2015
Land and buildings$13,326
 $16,518
Information technology assets10,918
 13,645
Construction in progress6,555
 7,324
Leasehold improvements1,868
 2,576
Furniture and fixtures79
 83
Property and equipment, gross32,746
 40,146
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(8,863) (11,130)
Property and equipment, net$23,883
 $29,016
Property under capital lease with a cost basis of $258 million was included in land and Equipment

Propertybuildings as of December 31, 2015.

Prepaid Revenue Share, Expenses and equipment consistedOther Assets, Non-Current
Note Receivable
In connection with the sale of our Motorola Mobile business on October 29, 2014 (see Note 9 for additional information), we received an interest-free, three-year prepayable promissory note (the "Note Receivable") due October 2017 from Lenovo. The Note Receivable is included in prepaid revenue share, expenses and other assets, non-current, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Based on the followinggeneral market conditions and the credit quality of Lenovo, we discounted the Note Receivable at an effective interest rate of 4.5%. The outstanding balances are shown in the table below (in millions):

   As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
December 31,
2012
 

Information technology assets

  $6,060    $7,717  

Land and buildings

   5,228     6,257  

Construction in progress

   2,128     2,240  

Leasehold improvements

   919     1,409  

Furniture and fixtures

   65     74  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   14,400     17,697  

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

   4,797     5,843  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

  $9,603    $11,854  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 As of
December 31, 2014
 As of
December 31, 2015
Principal of the Note Receivable
$1,500
 $1,448
Less: unamortized discount for the Note Receivable(175) (112)
Total$1,325
 $1,336
As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, we did not recognize a valuation allowance on the Note Receivable.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI, net of tax, were as follows (in millions):

   As of
December 31,
2011
  As of
December 31,
2012
 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  $(148 $(73

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes

   327    604  

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of taxes

   97    7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  $276   $538  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Investments Unrealized Gains on Cash Flow Hedges Total
Balance as of December 31, 2012$(73) $604
 $7
 $538
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications89
 (392) 112
 (191)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI0
 (162) (60) (222)
Other comprehensive income (loss)89
 (554) 52
 (413)
Balance as of December 31, 2013$16
 $50
 $59
 $125

75

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Investments Unrealized Gains on Cash Flow Hedges Total
Balance as of December 31, 2013$16
 $50
 $59
 $125
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(996) 505
 651
 160
Amounts reclassified from AOCI0
 (134) (124) (258)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(996) 371
 527
 (98)
Balance as of December 31, 2014$(980) $421
 $586
 $27
 Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Investments Unrealized Gains on Cash Flow Hedges Total
Balance as of December 31, 2014$(980) $421
 $586
 $27
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(1,067) (715) 676
 (1,106)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI0
 208
 (1,003) (795)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(1,067) (507) (327) (1,901)
Balance as of December 31, 2015$(2,047) $(86) $259
 $(1,874)
The effects on net income of amounts reclassified from AOCI were as follows (in millions):
  


 Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income
    Year Ended December 31,
 AOCI Components Location 2013 2014 2015
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments        
  Other income (expense), net $158
 $153
 $(208)
  Net Income (loss) from discontinued operations 43
 0
 0
  Provision for income taxes (39) (19) 0
  Net of tax $162
 $134
 $(208)
         
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges        
   Foreign exchange contracts Revenue $95
 $171
 $1,399
   Interest rate contracts Other income (expense), net 0
 4
 5
  Provision for income taxes (35) (51) (401)
  Net of tax $60
 $124
 $1,003
         
Total amount reclassified, net of tax   $222
 $258
 $795
Note 6. Acquisitions

On May 22, 2012,

2015 Acquisitions
bebop Technologies
In December 2015, we completed ourthe acquisition of Motorola,bebop Technologies Inc. (bebop), a providercompany with a cloud-based development platform focused on enterprise applications. The fair value of innovative technologies, productstotal consideration transferred in connection with the close was $272 million, of which $1 million was paid in cash and services that enable$271 million was paid in the form of Alphabet Class C capital stock. We issued a rangetotal of mobile and wireline digital communication, information and entertainment experiences. The acquisition is expected to protect and advance our Android ecosystem and enhance competition in mobile computing. Under the transaction, we acquired all outstanding commonapproximately 514 thousand shares of MotorolaAlphabet Class C capital

76

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

stock in relation to this acquisition, part of which will be accounted for $40 per shareas compensation expense. The fair value of the shares of capital stock issued was determined based on the closing market price of Alphabet's Class C capital stock as of the close date. The Class C capital stock issued by Alphabet in connection with the acquisition was treated as a capital contribution from Alphabet to Google. We expect the acquisition will help us provide a new platform to build and all vested Motorola stock optionsmaintain enterprise applications. As part of the acquisition, Diane Greene, the former CEO of bebop and restricted stock units, for a member of our Board of Directors, has joined Google.
Of the total purchase price of approximately $12.4 billion in cash. In addition, we assumed $401$272 million, of unvested Motorola stock options and restricted stock units, which will be recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining service periods. Transaction costs were approximately $50$28 million which were recorded as general and administrative expense as incurred.

The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based upon a preliminary valuation and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period. The primary areas of the purchase price that are not yet finalized are related to certain legal matters, income taxes, and residual goodwill. Of the $12.4 billion total purchase price, $2.9 billion was cash acquired, $5.5 billion$59 million was attributed to patents and developed technology, $2.5 billionintangible assets, $206 million was attributed to goodwill, $0.7 billionand $21 million was attributed to customer relationships, and $0.8 billion to other net assets acquired.

liabilities assumed. The goodwill of $2.5 billion$206 million is primarily attributedattributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma basis, as if the Motorola acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2011, is presented as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2011           2012     

Revenues(1)

  $47,294    $53,656  

Net income

   8,792     10,583  

Net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock—diluted

   26.83     31.82  

(1)

Excludes Home.

These pro forma results are based on estimates and assumptions, which we believe are reasonable. They are not necessarily indicative of our consolidated results of operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had we been a combined company during the periods presented. The pro forma results include adjustments primarily related to amortization of acquired intangible assets, severance and benefit arrangements in connection with the acquisition, and stock-based compensation expenses for assumed unvested stock options and restricted stock units.

Other Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, we completed 52 other acquisitions and purchases of intangible assets for a total cash consideration of approximately $1,171$263 million. In aggregate, $4 million of which $733was cash acquired, $88 million was attributed to intangible assets, $138 million was attributed to goodwill, $462and $33 million to acquired intangible assets, and $24 millionwas attributed to net liabilities assumed.assets acquired. These acquisitions generally enhance the breadth and depth of our offerings, as well as expanding our expertise in engineering and other functional areas, our technologies, and our product offerings.areas. The amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is approximately $29$20 million.

Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate.

For all acquisitions and purchases completed during the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, patents and developed technology have a weighted-average useful life of 8.94.1 years, customer relationships have a weighted-average useful life of 7.44.0 years, and trade names and other have a weighted-average useful life of 9.06.8 years.

2014 Acquisitions
Nest
In February 2014, we completed the acquisition of Nest Labs, Inc. (Nest), a company whose mission is to reinvent devices in the home such as thermostats and smoke alarms. Prior to this transaction, we had an approximately 12% ownership interest in Nest. The acquisition is expected to enhance Google's suite of products and services and allow Nest to continue to innovate upon devices in the home, making them more useful, intuitive, and thoughtful, and to reach more users in more countries.
Of the total $2.6 billion purchase price and the fair value of our previously held equity interest of $152 million, $51 million was cash acquired, $430 million was attributed to intangible assets, $2.3 billion was attributed to goodwill, and $84 million was attributed to net liabilities assumed. The goodwill of $2.3 billion is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
This transaction is considered a “step acquisition” under GAAP whereby our ownership interest in Nest held before the acquisition was remeasured to fair value at the date of the acquisition. Such fair value was estimated by using discounted cash flow valuation methodologies. Inputs used in the methodologies primarily included projected future cash flows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The gain of $103 million as a result of remeasurement is included in other income (expense), net, on our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Dropcam
In July 2014, Nest completed the acquisition of Dropcam, Inc. (Dropcam), a company that enables consumers and businesses to monitor their homes and offices via video, for approximately $517 million in cash. With Dropcam on board, Nest expects to continue to reinvent products that will help shape the future of the connected home. Of the total purchase price of $517 million, $11 million was cash acquired, $55 million was attributed to intangible assets, $452 million was attributed to goodwill, and $1 million was attributed to net liabilities assumed. The goodwill of $452 million is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Skybox
In August 2014, we completed the acquisition of Skybox Imaging, Inc. (Skybox), a satellite imaging company, for approximately $478 million in cash. We expect the acquisition to keep Google Maps accurate with up-to-date imagery and, over time, improve internet access and disaster relief. Of the total purchase price of $478 million, $6 million was cash acquired, $69 million was attributed to intangible assets, $388 million was attributed to goodwill, and $15 million

77

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

was attributed to net assets acquired. The goodwill of $388 million is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Other Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2014, we completed other acquisitions and purchases of intangible assets for total consideration of approximately $1,466 million, which includes the fair value of our previously held equity interest of $33 million. In aggregate, $65 million was cash acquired, $405 million was attributed to intangible assets, $1,045 million was attributed to goodwill, and $49 million was attributed to net liabilities assumed. These acquisitions generally enhance the breadth and depth of our offerings, as well as expanding our expertise in engineering and other functional areas. The amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is approximately $55 million.
Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations, either individually or in aggregate.
For all acquisitions and purchases completed during the year ended December 31, 2014, patents and developed technology have a weighted-average useful life of 5.1 years, customer relationships have a weighted-average useful life of 4.5 years, and trade names and other have a weighted-average useful life of 6.9 years.
Note 7. Collaboration Agreement
On September 18, 2013, we announced the formation of Calico, a life science company with a mission to harness advanced technologies to increase our understanding of the biology that controls lifespan. Calico's results of operations and statement of financial position are included in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2015, Google has contributed $240 million to Calico in exchange for Calico convertible preferred units. As of December 31, 2015, Google has also committed to fund an additional $490 million on an as-needed basis.
In September 2014, AbbVie Inc. (AbbVie) and Calico announced a research and development collaboration intended to help both companies discover, develop, and bring to market new therapies for patients with age-related diseases, including neurodegeneration and cancer. As of December 31, 2015, AbbVie has contributed $750 million to fund the collaboration pursuant to the agreement, which reflects its total commitment. As of December 31, 2015, Calico has contributed $250 million and committed up to an additional $500 million.
Calico will use its scientific expertise to establish a world-class research and development facility, with a focus on drug discovery and early drug development; and AbbVie will provide scientific and clinical development support and its commercial expertise to bring new discoveries to market. Both companies will share costs and profits equally. AbbVie's contribution has been recorded as a liability on Calico's financial statements, which is reduced and reflected as a reduction to research and development expense as eligible research and development costs are incurred by Calico over the next few years.

Note 7.8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill
In conjunction with the Alphabet reorganization we are implementing a new operating structure. Consequently, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, we have multiple operating segments and reporting units, representing the individual businesses run separately under the Alphabet structure. Refer to Note 16 for further information. In conjunction with the changes to reporting units, we allocated goodwill to each reporting unit based on their relative fair values. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to our disclosed segments for the yearyears ended December 31, 20122014 and 2015 were as follows (in millions):

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $7,346  

Goodwill acquired

   3,230  

Goodwill adjustment

   (39
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

  $10,537  
  

 

 

 

Amounts of goodwill allocated to the Mobile and Home segments were not material. See Note 15 for further discussion of segment information.


78

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 Google Other Bets Total Consolidated
Balance as of December 31, 2013$11,492
 $
 $11,492
Acquisitions4,208
 
 4,208
Dispositions(43) 
 (43)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments(58) 
 (58)
Balance as of December 31, 2014$15,599
 $
 $15,599
Acquisitions139
 
 139
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments(71) 
 (71)
Allocation in the fourth quarter of 2015(416) 416
 
Acquisitions201
 4
 205
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments4
 (7) (3)
Balance as of December 31, 2015$15,456
 $413
 $15,869
Other Intangible Assets
Information regarding our acquisition-relatedpurchased intangible assets is as follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 2011 
   Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Carrying
Amount
 

Patents and developed technology

  $1,451    $698    $753  

Customer relationships

   1,288     573     715  

Trade names and other

   359     249     110  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $3,098    $1,520    $1,578  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 2012 
   Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Carrying
Value
 

Patents and developed technology

  $7,310    $1,323    $5,987  

Customer relationships

   2,061     847     1,214  

Trade names and other

   576     304     272  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $9,947    $2,474    $7,473  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 As of December 31, 2014
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Patents and developed technology$6,547
 $2,513
 $4,034
Customer relationships1,410
 1,168
 242
Trade names and other696
 365
 331
Total$8,653
 $4,046
 $4,607
 As of December 31, 2015
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
Patents and developed technology$6,592
 $3,213
 $3,379
Customer relationships1,343
 1,201
 142
Trade names and other795
 469
 326
Total$8,730
 $4,883
 $3,847
Patents and developed technology, customer relationships, and trade names and other have weighted-average useful lives from the date of purchase of 8.17.8 years, 6.66.0 years, and 5.8 years.5.4 years, respectively. Amortization expense of acquisition-relatedrelating to our purchased intangible assets was $1,011 million, $1,079 million, and $892 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011,2013, 2014, and 2012 was $314 million, $441 million, and $884 million. For2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, net loss from discontinued operations included $702014, we recorded an impairment charge in other cost of revenues of $378 million of amortization expense related to Homea patent licensing royalty asset acquired in connection with the Motorola acquisition, which we retained subsequent to the sale of Motorola Mobile. The asset was determined to be impaired due to prolonged decreased royalty payments and unpaid interest owed and was written down to its fair value. Fair value was determined based on a discounted cash flow method and reflects estimated future cash flows associated with the patent licensing royalty asset at the measurement date and falls within level 3 in fair value hierarchy. Impairments of intangible assets.

assets were not material for the year ended December 31, 2015.


79

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, expected amortization expense for acquisition-relatedour purchased intangible assets for each of the next five years and thereafter was as follows (in millions):

2013

  $1,188  

2014

   1,115  

2015

   956  

2016

   879  

2017

   821  

Thereafter

   2,514  
  

 

 

 
  $7,473  
  

 

 

 
2016$806
2017724
2018637
2019528
2020434
Thereafter718
 $3,847

Note 8.9. Discontinued Operations

In December 2012,

Motorola Mobile
On October 29, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Arris Group, Inc. and certain other persons providing forclosed the dispositionsale of the Motorola HomeMobile business to Lenovo for a total considerationpurchase price of approximately $2.35$2.9 billion, including $1.4 billion paid at close, comprised of $660 million in cash and common stock, subject to certain adjustments.$750 million in Lenovo ordinary shares (519.1 million shares). The transaction is expected to closeremaining $1.5 billion was paid in 2013. Financial resultsthe form of an interest-free, three-year prepayable promissory note.
We maintain ownership of the vast majority of the Motorola HomeMobile patent portfolio, including pre-closing patent applications and invention disclosures, which we licensed to Motorola Mobile for its continued operations. Additionally, in connection with the sale, we agreed to indemnify Lenovo for certain potential liabilities of the Motorola Mobile business, arefor which we recorded an indemnification liability of $130 million.
The sale resulted in a gain of $740 million, net of tax, which was presented as part of net lossincome from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Incremental to this net gain, we recognized additional income of $254 million, net of tax, in connection with certain IP licensing arrangements between the parties, included as part of net income from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The financial results of Motorola Mobile through the date of divestiture are presented as net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table presents financial results of the Motorola Mobile business included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 (in millions):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 
2014 (1)
Revenues$4,306
 $5,486
    
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes(1,403) (177)
Benefits from/(Provision for) income taxes270
 (47)
Gain on disposal0
 740
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations$(1,133) $516
(1)
The operating results of Motorola Mobile were included in our Consolidated Statements of Income from January 1, 2014 through October 29, 2014, the date of divestiture.

80

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The following table presents the aggregate carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities divested (in millions):
Assets: 
Cash and cash equivalents$160
Accounts receivable1,103
Inventories217
Prepaid expenses and other current assets357
Prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current290
Property and equipment, net542
Intangible assets, net985
Goodwill43
Total assets$3,697
  
Liabilities: 
Accounts payable$1,238
Accrued compensation and benefits163
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities10
Deferred revenue, current165
Other long-term liabilities250
Total liabilities$1,826
Motorola Home
On April 17, 2013, we sold the Motorola Home business to Arris for consideration of approximately $2,412 million in cash, including cash of $2,238 million received at the date of close and certain post-close adjustments of $174 million received in the third quarter of 2013, and approximately $175 million in Arris' common stock (10.6 million shares). Subsequent to the transaction, we own approximately 7.8% of the outstanding shares of Arris. Additionally, in connection with the disposition, we agreed to indemnify Arris for potential liability from certain intellectual property infringement litigation, for which we recorded an indemnification liability of $175 million, the majority of which was settled subsequent to the disposition.
The disposition resulted in a net gain of $757 million, which was presented as part of net income from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The financial results of Motorola Home through the date of divestiture are presented as net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The following table presents financial results of the Motorola Home business for the periodincluded in net income (loss) from May 22, 2012 to December 31, 2012 (in millions):

Revenues

  $2,028  

Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes

   (22

Provision for income taxes

   (29

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $(51

Note 9.    Restructuring charges

Subsequent to our acquisition of Motorola in May 2012, we initiated a restructuring plan primarily in our Mobile segment to reduce workforce, reorganize management structure, close, consolidate and dispose certain facilities, as well as simplify our mobile product portfolio. These changes are designed to return Motorola’s Mobile segment to profitability. Fordiscontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012, activities related to restructuring charges were summarized as below2013 (in millions):

   Severance and
Related
  Other
Charges
  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $0   $0   $0  

Charges(1)

   572    59    631  

Cash payments

   (189  (8  (197

Non-cash items(2)

   (145  (36  (181
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

  $238   $15   $253  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Includes restructuring charges related to

 Year Ended December 31,
 
2013 (1)
Revenues$804
  
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes(67)
Benefits from income taxes16
Gain on disposal757
Net income from discontinued operations$706
(1)The operating results of Motorola Home of $55 million.

(2)

Non-cash items were primarily related to RSUs, stock options and asset impairments.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, restructuring charges were included in costs and expenses as follows (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 2012 
   Severance and
Related
   Other
Charges
   Total 

Cost of revenues—Motorola Mobile

  $88    $41    $129  

Research and development

   195     5     200  

Sales and marketing

   123     8     131  

General and administrative

   114     2     116  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total charges

  $520    $56    $576  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Restructuring charges related to Home of $55 million were included in net loss from discontinued operations in theour Consolidated Statements of Income.

We continue to evaluate our plansIncome from January 1, 2013 through April 17, 2013, the date of divestiture.


81

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The following table presents the aggregate carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and further restructuring actions may occur which may cause us to incur additional restructuring charges, some of which may be significant.

liabilities divested (in millions):

Assets: 
Accounts receivable$424
Inventories228
Deferred income taxes, net144
Prepaid and other current assets152
Property and equipment, net282
Intangible assets, net701
Other assets, non-current182
Total assets$2,113
Liabilities: 
Accounts payable$169
Accrued expenses and other liabilities289
Total liabilities$458
Note 10. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

The components of interest and other income (expense), net, were as follows (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Interest income

  $579   $812   $713  

Interest expense

   (5  (58  (84

Realized gains on available-for-sale investments, net

   185    254    282  

Impairment of equity investments

   0    (110  0  

Foreign currency exchange losses

   (355  (379  (531

Gain on divestiture of business

   0    0    188  

Other

   11    65    58  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest and other income, net

  $415   $584   $626  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Interest income$766
 $746
 $999
Interest expense(81) (101) (104)
Gain (loss) on marketable securities, net158
 153
 (208)
Foreign currency exchange losses, net (1)
(379) (402) (422)
Gain (loss) on non-marketable investments, net8
 237
 (126)
Loss on divestiture of businesses (2)
(57) 0
 0
Other81
 130
 152
Other income (expense), net$496
 $763
 $291
(1)
Our foreign currency exchange losses,net are related to the option premium costs and forward points for our foreign currency hedging contracts, our foreign exchange transaction gains and losses from the conversion of the transaction currency to the functional currency, offset by the foreign currency hedging contract losses and gains. The net foreign currency transaction losses were $121 million, $107 million, and $123 million in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Gain on divestiture of Motorola Home business was included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. Gain on divestiture of Motorola Mobile business was included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

We have entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for certain of our offices, facilities, land, and data centers throughout the world with original lease periods expiring primarily between 20132016 and 2063. We are committed to pay a portion of the actual operating expenses under certain of these lease agreements. These operating expenses are not included in the table below. Certain of these arrangements have free or escalating rent payment provisions. We recognize rent expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis.

At


82

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease income amounts, were as follows over each of the next five years and thereafter (in millions):

   Operating
Leases
   Sub-lease
Income
   Net
Operating
Leases
 

2013

   492     26     466  

2014

   475     22     453  

2015

   434     17     417  

2016

   374     12     362  

2017

   333     7     326  

Thereafter

   1,596     1     1,595  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total minimum payments

  $3,704    $85    $3,619  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 
Operating
Leases
 
Sub-lease
Income
 
Net
Operating
Leases
2016672
 26
 646
2017794
 13
 781
2018796
 4
 792
2019769
 3
 766
2020719
 3
 716
Thereafter3,706
 1
 3,705
Total minimum payments$7,456
 $50

$7,406
Certain leases have adjustments for market provisions. Amounts in the above table represent our best estimates of future payments to be made under these leases. In addition,
We entered into certain non-cancelable lease agreements with original lease periods expiring between 2021 and 2032 where we are the abovedeemed owner for accounting purposes of new construction projects. Future minimum lease payments under such leases total approximately $678 million, of which $422 million is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015. These amounts are presented as an asset and corresponding non-current liability, which represents our estimate of construction costs incurred to date. They have been excluded from the table does not include future rental income of $649 million related to the leases that we assumed in connection with our building purchases. above.
Rent expense under operating leases, including co-location arrangements, was $293$465 million, $380$570 million, and $448$734 million in 2010, 2011,2013, 2014, and 2012.

2015.

Purchase Obligations

At

As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had $2.1$1.7 billion of other non-cancelable contractual obligations, primarily related to certain of our distribution arrangements,data center operations and facility build-outs, video and other content licensing revenue sharing arrangements, as well as data center operations and facility build-outs.

certain inventory purchase commitments.

Letters of Credit

At

As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had unused letters of credit for $89 million, of which $45 million related to our Mobile segment.

$752 million.

Indemnifications

In the normal course of business, to facilitate transactions in our services and products, we indemnify certain parties, including advertisers, Google Network Members, and lessors with respect to certain matters. We have agreed to hold certain parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. Several of these agreements limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors, and our bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to our agents.

It is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Additionally, we have a limited history of prior indemnification claims and the payments we have made under such

agreements have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows, or financial position. However, to the extent that valid indemnification claims arise in the future, future payments by us could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a particular period.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, we did not have any material indemnification claims that were probable or reasonably possible.

Legal Matters

Antitrust Investigations

In June 2011, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Bureau of Competition and a subpoena from the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection relating to a review by the FTC of our business practices, including search and advertising. In June 2012, we also received a CID and a subpoena duces tecum from the FTC’s Bureau of Competition seeking documents and information broadly related to Motorola’s licensing practices for standards-essential patents and use of standards-essential patents in litigation. In January 2013, the FTC closed its investigations into our business practices, including search and advertising. In connection with the closing As part of the investigation, we have voluntarily agreed to make certain product changes. In addition, wesale of Motorola Home and Motorola have entered into a consent order withMobile businesses, we issued indemnifications for certain potential liabilities. Please see Note 9 for additional information.

Legal Matters
Antitrust Investigations
On November 30, 2010, the FTC setting forth certain guidelines on our use of standards-essential patents in litigation.

State attorneys general from the states of Texas, Ohio, and Mississippi have issued similar CIDs relating to our business practices. We are cooperating with the state attorneys general and are responding to their information requests on an ongoing basis.

The European Commission’sCommission's (EC) Directorate General for Competition has also opened an investigation into various antitrust-related complaints against us. Since February 2010, we have received a number of notifications fromOn April 15, 2015, the EC about antitrust complaints filed against us. On November 30, 2010,issued a Statement of


83

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Objections (SO) regarding the display and ranking of shopping search results. The EC formallyalso opened proceedings against us.a formal investigation into Android. We believe we have adequately responded to all of the allegations made against us. WeSO on August 27, 2015 and will continue to cooperate with the EC and are pursuing a potential resolution that would avoid a finding of infringement and a fine. The EC has also opened an investigation into Motorola’s licensing practices for standards-essential patents and use of standards-essential patents in litigation on the basis of complaints brought by Microsoft and Apple. We are cooperating with the EC and responding to the information requests on an ongoing basis.

EC.

The Comision Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia in Argentina, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), Brazil's Council for Economic Defense (CADE), the Canadian Competition Bureau (CCB), and the Korea Fair Trade Commission in South KoreaFederal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) of the Russian Federation have also opened investigations into certain business practices.

EPA Investigation

In February 2009, we learned of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) investigation into an alleged release of refrigerant at one of our smaller data center facilities, whichbusiness practices. In August 2015, we acquired from DoubleClick,received the CCI Director General's report with interim findings of competition law infringements regarding search and ads. In September 2015, FAS found that there has been a competition law infringement in Android mobile distribution. We will respond to the accuracy of related statements and records. We are cooperating with the EPACCI's report and have provided documentsfiled an appeal of the FAS decision. In July 2015, the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission informed us that it was closing its antitrust investigations of our business practices.

The state attorney general from Mississippi issued subpoenas in 2011 and other materials.

2012 in an antitrust investigation of our business practices. We have responded to those subpoenas, and we remain willing to cooperate with them if they have any further information requests.

Patent and Intellectual Property Claims

We have had patent, copyright, and trademark infringement lawsuits filed against us claiming that certain of our products, services, and technologies including Android, Google Search, Google AdWords, Google AdSense, Google Books, Google News, Google Image Search, Google Chrome, Google Talk, Google Voice, Motorola devices and YouTube, infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Adverse results in these lawsuits may include awards of substantial monetary damages, costly royalty or licensing agreements, or orders preventing us from offering certain features, functionalities, products, or services, and may also cause us to change our business

practices, and require development of non-infringing products or technologies, which could result in a loss of revenues for us and otherwise harm our business. In addition, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has increasingly become an important forum to litigate intellectual property disputes because an ultimate loss for a company or its suppliers in an ITC action could result in a prohibition on importing infringing products into the U.S. Since the U.S. is an important market, a prohibition on importation could have an adverse effect on us, including preventing us from importing many important products into the U.S. or necessitating workarounds that may limit certain features of our products.

Furthermore, many of our agreements with our customers and partners require us to indemnify them for certain intellectual property infringement claims against them, which would increase our costs as a result of defending such claims, and may require that we pay significant damages if there were an adverse ruling in any such claims. Our customers and partners may discontinue the use of our products, services, and technologies, as a result of injunctions or otherwise, which could result in loss of revenues and adversely impact our business.

In December 2012, we announced that Motorola Mobility had entered into an agreement with Arris Group, Inc. and certain other persons providing for the disposition of Motorola’s Home business for total consideration of approximately $2.35 billion, subject to certain adjustments. Under the agreement, we have agreed to indemnify Arris Group for potential liability from certain intellectual property infringement litigation, including, among others, a patent infringement claim brought by TiVo relating to certain digital video recording equipment sold by Motorola Mobility.

Other

We are also regularly subject to claims, suits, government investigations, and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust (such as the pending EC investigations by the FTC and the EC described above), intellectual property, privacy, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes, content generated by our users, goods and services offered by advertisers or publishers using our platforms, personal injury, consumer protection, and other matters. Such claims, suits, government investigations, and other proceedings could result in fines, civil or criminal penalties, or other adverse consequences.

Certain of our outstanding legal matters include speculative claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts of damages. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, we disclose the possible loss. We evaluate, on a monthly basis, developments in our legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and the matters and related reasonably possible losses disclosed, and make adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both likelihood of there being and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters.

With respect to our outstanding legal matters, based on our current knowledge, we believe that the amount or range of reasonably possible loss will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the outcome of such legal matters is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties.

We expense legal fees in the period in which they are incurred.

Income

Taxes

We are under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and various other domestic and foreign tax authorities.authorities with regards to income tax and indirect tax matters. We have reserved for potential adjustments to our provision for income taxes and accrual of indirect taxes that may result from examinations by, or any negotiated agreements with, these tax authorities, and we believe that the final outcome of these examinations or agreements will not have a

84

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

material effect on our results of operations. If events occur which indicate payment of these amounts is unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in the recognition of tax benefits in the period we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. If our estimates of the federal, state, and foreign income tax liabilities and indirect tax liabilities are less than the ultimate assessment, it would result in a further charge to expenseexpense.
Please see Note 15 for additional information regarding contingencies related to our income taxes.
Note 12. Net Income Per Share
Alphabet
We compute net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock using the two-class method. Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and the effect of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, restricted stock units, and other contingently issuable shares. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, restricted stock units, and other contingently issuable shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The computation of the diluted net income per share of Class A common stock assumes the conversion of Class B common stock, while the diluted net income per share of Class B common stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.
The rights, including the liquidation and dividend rights, of the holders of our Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock are identical, except with respect to voting. Further, there are a number of safeguards built into our certificate of incorporation, as well as Delaware law, which preclude our board of directors from declaring or paying unequal per share dividends on our Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock. Specifically, Delaware law provides that amendments to our certificate of incorporation which would result.

have the effect of adversely altering the rights, powers, or preferences of a given class of stock must be approved by the class of stock adversely affected by the proposed amendment. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that before any such amendment may be put to a stockholder vote, it must be approved by the unanimous consent of our board of directors. As a result, the undistributed earnings for each year are allocated based on the contractual participation rights of the Class A and Class B common shares and Class C capital stock as if the earnings for the year had been distributed. As the liquidation and dividend rights are identical, the undistributed earnings are allocated on a proportionate basis. The net income per share amounts are the same for Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock because the holders of each class are legally entitled to equal per share distributions whether through dividends or in liquidation. Further, as we assume the conversion of Class B common stock in the computation of the diluted net income per share of Class A common stock, the undistributed earnings are equal to net income for that computation.
Stock Split Effected In Form of Stock Dividend
In January 2014, our board of directors approved the distribution of shares of Class C capital stock as a dividend to our holders of Class A and Class B common stock (the Stock Split). The Stock Split had a record date of March 27, 2014 and a payment date of April 2, 2014. 
In the second quarter of 2015, in accordance with a settlement of litigation involving the authorization to distribute Class C capital stock, at the close of trading on April 2, 2015, the last trading day of the 365 day period following the first date the Class C shares traded on NASDAQ (Lookback Period), we determined that a payment (the Adjustment Payment) in the amount of $522 million was due to Class C capital stockholders. The amount of the Adjustment Payment was based on the percentage difference that developed between the volume-weighted average price of Class A and Class C shares during the Lookback Period, as supplied by NASDAQ Data-on-Demand, and was payable to holders of Class C capital stock as of the end of the Lookback Period in cash, Class A common stock, Class C capital stock, or a combination thereof, at the discretion of our board of directors. On April 22, 2015, our board of directors approved the Adjustment Payment in shares of Class C capital stock, and cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Class C capital stock. In May 2015, the Adjustment Payment was made, resulting in the issuance of approximately 853 thousand shares of Class C capital stock, with $475 million reflected in additional-paid in capital and $47 million of cash in lieu of fractional shares of Class C capital stock.
In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Adjustment Payment was allocated to the numerator for calculating net income per share of Class C capital stock from net income available to all stockholders and the remaining undistributed earnings were allocated on a pro rata basis to Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock based on the number of shares used in the per share computation for each class of stock. The weighted-average share impact of the Adjustment Payment is included in the denominator of both basic and diluted net income per share computations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

85

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

In the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, the net income per share amounts are the same for Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock because the holders of each class are entitled to equal per share dividends or distributions in liquidation in accordance with our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Alphabet Inc.
The par value per share of our shares of Class A and Class B common stock remained unchanged at $0.001 per share after the Stock Split. On the effective date of the Stock Split, a transfer between retained earnings and common stock occurred in an amount equal to the $0.001 par value of the Class C capital stock that was issued.
Share and per share amounts for the prior periods presented below have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Stock Split.
Computation of Net Income Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share of Class A and Class B common stock and Class C capital stock (in millions, except share amounts which are reflected in thousands and per share amounts):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013
 Class A Class B Class C
Basic net income (loss) per share:     
Numerator     
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations$5,407
 $1,173
 $6,580
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations(175) (38) (214)
Total$5,232
 $1,135
 $6,366
Denominator     
Number of shares used in per share computation273,518
 59,328
 332,846
Basic net income (loss) per share:     
Continuing operations$19.77
 $19.77
 $19.77
Discontinued operations(0.64) (0.64) (0.64)
Basic net income per share$19.13
 $19.13
 $19.13
Diluted net income (loss) per share:     
Numerator     
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - continuing operations$5,407
 $1,173
 $6,580
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares1,173
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings0
 (21) 0
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations$6,580
 $1,152
 $6,580
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - discontinued operations(175) (38) (214)
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares(38) 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings(1) 1
 1
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations$(214) $(37) $(213)
Denominator     
Number of shares used in basic computation273,518
 59,328
 332,846
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities     
Add:     
Conversion of Class B to Class A common shares outstanding59,328
 0
 0
Employee stock options2,748
 4
 2,748
Restricted stock units and other contingently issuable shares3,215
 0
 3,215
Number of shares used in per share computation338,809
 59,332
 338,809
Diluted net income (loss) per share:     
Continuing operations$19.42
 $19.42
 $19.42
Discontinued operations(0.63) (0.63) (0.63)
Diluted net income per share$18.79
 $18.79
 $18.79


86

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2014
 Class A Class B Class C
Basic net income per share:     
Numerator     
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations$5,700
 $1,107
 $6,813
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations216
 42
 258
Total$5,916
 $1,149
 $7,071
Denominator     
Number of shares used in per share computation282,877
 54,928
 338,130
Basic net income per share:     
Continuing operations$20.15
 $20.15
 $20.15
Discontinued operations0.76
 0.76
 0.76
Basic net income per share$20.91
 $20.91
 $20.91
Diluted net income per share:     
Numerator     
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - continuing operations$5,700
 $1,107
 $6,813
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares1,107
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings(20) (18) 20
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations$6,787
 $1,089
 $6,833
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - discontinued operations216
 42
 258
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares42
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings(1) (1) 1
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations$257
 $41
 $259
Denominator     
Number of shares used in basic computation282,877
 54,928
 338,130
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities     
Add:     
Conversion of Class B to Class A common shares outstanding54,928
 0
 0
Employee stock options2,057
 0
 2,038
Restricted stock units and other contingently issuable shares2,515
 0
 4,525
Number of shares used in per share computation342,377
 54,928
 344,693
Diluted net income per share:     
Continuing operations$19.82
 $19.82
 $19.82
Discontinued operations0.75
 0.75
 0.75
Diluted net income per share$20.57
 $20.57
 $20.57

87

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2015
 Class A Class B Class C
Basic net income per share:     
Numerator     
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders - continuing operations$0
 $0
 $522
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations6,695
 1,196
 7,935
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations0
 0
 0
Total$6,695
 $1,196
 $8,457
Denominator     
Number of shares used in per share computation289,640
 51,745
 343,241
Basic net income per share:     
Continuing operations$23.11
 $23.11
 $24.63
Discontinued operations0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Basic net income per share$23.11
 $23.11
 $24.63
Diluted net income per share:     
Numerator     
Adjustment Payment to Class C capital stockholders - continuing operations$0
 $0
 $522
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - continuing operations$6,695
 $1,196
 $7,935
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares1,196
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings(39) (14) 39
Allocation of undistributed earnings - continuing operations7,852
 1,182
 7,974
Allocation of undistributed earnings for basic computation - discontinued operations0
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings as a result of conversion of Class B to Class A shares0
 0
 0
Reallocation of undistributed earnings0
 0
 0
Allocation of undistributed earnings - discontinued operations$0
 $0
 $0
Denominator     
Number of shares used in basic computation289,640
 51,745
 343,241
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities     
Add:     
Conversion of Class B to Class A common shares outstanding51,745
 0
 0
Employee stock options1,475
 0
 1,428
Restricted stock units and other contingently issuable shares920
 0
 4,481
Number of shares used in per share computation343,780
 51,745
 349,150
Diluted net income per share:     
Continuing operations$22.84
 $22.84
 $24.34
Discontinued operations0.00
 0.00
 0.00
Diluted net income per share$22.84
 $22.84
 $24.34
Google
Net income per share for Google is not required as its shares are not publicly traded.

Note 12.13. Stockholders’ Equity

Alphabet Reorganization
On October 2, 2015, Google implemented a legal reorganization, which resulted in Alphabet owning all of the outstanding stock of Google. Consequently, Google became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Alphabet. Each share of each class of Google stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the legal reorganization automatically converted into an equivalent corresponding share of Alphabet stock, and Google’s stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the legal reorganization became stockholders of Alphabet.
As a result of the reorganization, on October 2, 2015, the Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Google was amended to decrease the authorized number of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common

88

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

stock and Class C capital stock, par value $0.001 per share, from 9 billion shares, 3 billion shares and 3 billion shares, respectively, to 500 shares of each class of stock, respectively. Additionally, the authorized number of shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, was decreased from 100 million shares to 500 shares. As of December 31, 2015, Google had 100 shares of Class A common stock, 100 shares of Class B common stock, and 100 shares of Class C capital stock outstanding, of which Alphabet was the sole owner.
Alphabet Convertible Preferred Stock

Our board of directors has authorized 100,000,000100 million shares of convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, issuable in series. AtAs of December 31, 20112014 and 2012,2015, there were no shares issued or outstanding.

Alphabet Class A and Class B Common Stock

and Class C Capital Stock

Our board of directors has authorized twothree classes of common stock, Class A and Class B. At December 31, 2012, there were 9,000,000,000 and 3,000,000,000 shares authorized and there were 267,448,281 and 62,530,474 shares outstanding of Class A and Class B common stock, $0.001 par value.and Class C capital stock. The rights of the holders of Class Aeach class of our common and Class B commoncapital stock are identical, except with respect to voting. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes per share. Class C capital stock has no voting rights, except as required by applicable law. Shares of Class B common stock may be converted at any time at the option of the stockholder and automatically convert upon sale or transfer to Class A common stock. We refer to Class A and Class B common stock as common stock throughout the notes to these financial statements, unless otherwise noted.

Stock Dividend

In April 2012, our board of directors approved amendments to our certificate of incorporation that would, among other things, createPlans

As a new class of non-voting capital stock (Class C capital stock). The amendments authorized 3 billion shares of Class C capital stock and also increased the authorized shares of Class A common stock from 6 billion to 9 billion. The amendments are reflected in our Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (New Charter), the adoption of which was approved by stockholders at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 21, 2012. We have announced the intention of our board of directors to consider a distribution of sharesresult of the Class C capitalAlphabet reorganization, on October 2, 2015, Google transferred to Alphabet, and Alphabet assumed, sponsorship of all of Google's stock as a dividend to our holdersplans along with all of Class A and Class B common stock (Dividend). The Class C capital stock will have no voting rights, except as required by applicable law. Except as expressly provided in the New Charter, shares of Class C capital stock will have the sameGoogle's rights and privileges and rank equally, share ratably and be identical in all other respects toobligations under each plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock as to all matters.

The par value per share of our shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will remain unchanged at $0.001 per share after the Dividend. On the effective date of the Dividend, there will be a transfer between retained earnings and common stock and the amount transferred will be equal to the $0.001 par value of the Class C capital stock that is issued. We will give retroactive effect to prior period share and per share amounts in our consolidated financial statementsreserved for the effect of the Dividend, such that prior periods are comparable to current period presentation.

Stock Plans

We maintain the 1998 Stock Plan, the 2000 Stock Plan, the 2003 Stock Plan, the 2003 Stock Plan (No. 2), the 2003 Stock Plan (No. 3),future grants under the 2004 Stock Plan expired and plans assumed through acquisitions, all of which are collectively referred to aswe began granting awards from the “Stock Plans.”2012 Stock Plan (“Stock Plan”). Under our Stock Plans, incentive and non-qualifiedPlan, RSUs or stock options or rights to purchase common stock may be granted to eligible participants. Options are generally granted for a term of 10 years. Under the Stock Plans, we have also issued RSUs.granted. An RSU award is an agreement to issue shares of our publicly traded stock at the time the award vests. ExceptIncentive and non-qualified stock options, or rights to purchase common stock, are generally granted for options granted pursuant to our stock option exchange program completed in March 2009 (the Exchange), options granteda term of 10 years. Options and RSUs issuedgranted to participants under the Stock PlansPlan generally vest over four years contingent upon employment or service with us on the vesting date.

At

As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012,2015, there were 21,794,492 and 15,833,05023,336,944 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Stock Plans.

We estimated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the BSM option pricing model. Our assumptions about stock-price volatility have been based exclusively on the implied volatilities of publicly traded options to buy our stock with contractual terms closest to the expected life of options granted to our employees. We estimate the expected term based upon the historical exercise behavior of our employees. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

Plan.

Stock-Based Compensation
The following table presents our aggregate stock-based compensation expense by type of costs and expenses per the weighted-average assumptions used to estimateConsolidated Statements of Income (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Cost of revenues$469
 $535
 $806
Research and development1,641
 2,200
 2,687
Sales and marketing552
 715
 899
General and administrative465
 725
 861
Discontinued operations216
 104
 0
Total stock-based compensation expense
$3,343
 $4,279
 $5,253
For the fair valuesyears ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015, we recognized tax benefits on total stock-based compensation expense from continuing operations of $685 million, $867 million, and $1,133 million, respectively, and from discontinued operations of $59 million, $30 million and $0 million, respectively. In addition, as a result of the stock options grantedTax Court ruling in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, we have recorded a tax benefit of $522 million related to 2015 stock-based compensation expense that will be subject to reimbursement of cost share payments if the tax court's opinion is sustained. Refer to Note 15 for more detail regarding the Altera case.
Of the total stock-based compensation expense from continuing operations recognized in the periods presented:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.9  2.3  1.0

Expected volatility

   35  33  29

Expected life (in years)

   5.4    5.9    5.2  

Dividend yield

   0    0    0  

Weighted-average estimated fair value of options granted during the year

  $216.43   $210.07   $194.27  

years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015, $0 million, $0 million, and $50 million, respectively, was associated with awards ultimately settled in cash. Awards which will be ultimately settled in cash are classified as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Stock-based compensation associated with Alphabet equity awards granted to Google employees in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015, was treated as a capital contribution from Alphabet to Google. Stock-based

89

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

compensation associated with equity awards for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 are presented as stock-based compensation expense in Alphabet's and Google's Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
Alphabet Stock-Based Award Activities
The following table summarizes the activities for our options for the year ended December 31, 2012:

   Options Outstanding 
   Number of
Shares
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise

Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)(1)
 

Balance at December 31, 2011

   9,807,252   $357.92      

Granted(2)

   1,392,191   $580.45      

Exercised

   (2,409,331 $305.81      

Forfeited/canceled

   (238,717 $460.45      
  

 

 

      

Balance at December 31, 2012

   8,551,395   $405.98     5.2    $2,516  
  

 

 

      

Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2012

   6,023,559   $351.44     4.1    $2,099  

Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2012 and expected to vest thereafter(3)

   8,218,732   $400.72     5.2    $2,461  

2015:
 Options Outstanding
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)(1)
Balance as of December 31, 20147,240,419
 $215.56
    
Granted0
 N/A
    
Exercised(2,072,550) $189.64
    
Forfeited/canceled(268,886) $310.47
    
Balance as of December 31, 20154,898,983
 $221.31
 3.7 $2,682
Exercisable as of December 31, 20154,462,847
 $212.02
 3.4 $2,484
Exercisable as of December 31, 2015 and expected to vest thereafter (2)
4,846,996
 $220.29
 3.6 $2,658
(1) 

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the closing stock priceprices of $707.38$778.01 and $758.88 of our Class A common stock and Class C capital stock, respectively, on December 31, 2012.

2015.

(2) 

Includes options granted in connection with the acquisition of Motorola.

(3)

Options expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate.

The following table summarizes additional information regarding outstanding, exercisable, and exercisable and vested stock options at December 31, 2012:

   Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable   Options Exercisable
and Vested
 

Range of Exercise Prices

  Number of
Shares
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Life
(in years)
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Shares
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Shares
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$0.30–$94.80

   116,852     1.7    $37.03     116,852    $37.03     113,209    $35.41  

$117.84–$198.41

   248,831     2.0    $178.65     248,831    $178.65     248,831    $178.65  

$205.96–$298.86

   282,647     2.4    $275.51     282,552    $275.51     282,552    $275.51  

$300.97–$399.00

   3,998,815     3.8    $309.39     3,642,248    $309.57     3,642,248    $309.57  

$401.78–$499.07

   993,591     5.9    $442.95     766,098    $441.55     766,098    $441.55  

$501.27–$595.35

   1,803,839     6.9    $536.31     848,574    $529.82     848,574    $529.82  

$601.17–$699.35

   1,089,126     8.9    $629.41     120,757    $614.76     120,757    $614.76  

$710.84–$762.5

   17,694     9.7    $762.27     1,290    $759.30     1,290    $759.30  
  

 

 

       

 

 

     

 

 

   

$0.30–$762.5

   8,551,395     5.2    $405.98     6,027,202    $351.28     6,023,559    $351.44  
  

 

 

       

 

 

     

 

 

   

The above tables include approximately 1.6 million warrants held by selected financial institutions that were options purchased from employees under our TSO program, with a weighted-average exercise price of $363.66 and a weighted-average remaining life of 1.3 years.

During 2012, the number of shares underlying TSOs sold to selected financial institutions under the TSO program was 1,226,983 at a total value of $365 million, or an average of $297.28 per share, including an average premium of $9.35 per share. The premium is calculated as the difference between (a) the sale price of the TSO and (b) the intrinsic value of the TSO, which we define as the excess, if any, of the price of our Class A common stock at the time of the sale over the exercise price of the TSO.

The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during 2010, 2011,2013, 2014 and 20122015 was $690$223 million, $561$94 million, and $489$33 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of all options and warrants exercised during 2010, 2011,2013, 2014 and 20122015 was $794$1,793 million, $674$589 million, and $827$867 million. These amounts do not include the aggregate sales price of options sold under our TSO program.

Transferable Stock Options (TSO) program, which was discontinued as of November 29, 2013.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, there was $386$12 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding employee stock options. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.20.6 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what we have estimated, stock-based compensation expense related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2012:

   Unvested Restricted Stock Units 
       Number of    
Shares
  Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Unvested at December 31, 2011

   8,822,648   $520.27  

Granted(1)

   6,704,261   $603.57  

Vested

   (3,884,811 $530.15  

Forfeited/canceled

   (647,171 $543.04  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2012

   10,994,927   $566.32  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expected to vest after December 31, 2012(2)

   9,547,995   $566.32  

2015:
 Unvested Restricted Stock Units
 
    Number of    
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Unvested as of December 31, 201424,619,549
 $487.80
Granted14,415,740
 $546.46
 Vested(11,182,606) $442.01
 Forfeited/canceled(2,111,497) $481.37
Unvested as of December 31, 201525,741,186
 $531.74
Expected to vest after December 31, 2015 (1)
22,672,837
 $531.74
(1)

Includes RSUs granted in connection with the acquisition of Motorola.

(2)

RSUs expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, there was $4.8$11.1 billion of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested employee RSUs. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what we have estimated, stock-based compensation expense related to these awards will be different from our expectations.

Share Repurchases
In October 2015, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to repurchase up to $5,099,019,513.59 of its Class C capital stock, commencing in the fourth quarter of 2015. The repurchases are being executed from time to time, subject to general business and market conditions and other investment opportunities, through open market

90

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through the use of 10b5-1 plans. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date. As of December 31, 2015, we repurchased and subsequently retired approximately 2,391 thousand shares of Alphabet Class C capital stock for an aggregate amount of approximately $1,780 million. Alphabet's share repurchases in the year ended December 31, 2015 were funded by Google via a return of capital to Alphabet.
In January 2016, the board of directors of Alphabet authorized the company to repurchase an additional amount of approximately 514 thousand shares.
Google Stockholders' Equity
As a result of the Alphabet reorganization, Google has recorded various intercompany activities during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015 as capital transactions, which are reflected in Google's Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity. Refer to Stock-Based Compensation and Share Repurchases section above, and Note 13.6, for descriptions of certain activities. Additionally, subsequent to the reorganization, shares withheld to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations and cash received from the exercise of stock options were recorded as capital transactions between Alphabet and Google and are reflected as such in Google's Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
Note 14. 401(k) Plans

We have two 401(k) Savings Plans (401(k) Plans) that qualify as deferred salary arrangements under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under these 401(k) Plans, matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees’ contributions subject to certain limitations. We contributed approximately $100$202 million, $136$259 million, and $180$309 million during 2010, 2011,for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2012.

2015.

Note 14.15. Income Taxes

Income from continuing operations before income taxes included income from domestic operations of $4,948$7,651 million, $4,693$8,894 million, and $5,311$8,271 million for 2010, 2011,the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2012,2015, and income from foreign operations of $5,848$8,248 million, $7,633$8,365 million, and $8,075$11,380 million for 2010, 2011,the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2012. Substantially all of the income from foreign operations was earned by an Irish subsidiary.

2015.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Current:

    

Federal

  $1,657   $1,724   $2,342  

State

   458    274    171  

Foreign

   167    248    358  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   2,282    2,246    2,871  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred:

    

Federal

   (25  452    (328

State

   47    (109  (19

Foreign

   (13  (0  74  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   9    343    (273
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

  $2,291   $2,589   $2,598  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Current:     
Federal$2,394
 $2,716
 $3,235
State127
 157
 (397)
Foreign711
 774
 723
Total3,232
 3,647
 3,561
Deferred:     
Federal(421) 29
 (198)
State0
 6
 (43)
Foreign(72) (43) (17)
Total(493) (8) (258)
Provision for income taxes$2,739
 $3,639
 $3,303

91

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The reconciliation of federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows (in millions):

   Year ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Expected provision at federal statutory tax rate (35%)

  $3,779   $4,314   $4,685  

State taxes, net of federal benefit

   322    122    99  

Stock-based compensation expense

   79    105    52  

Change in valuation allowance

   (34  27    1,921  

Foreign rate differential

   (1,769  (2,001  (2,200

Federal research credit

   (84  (140  0  

Tax exempt interest

   (12  (10  (7

Non-deductible legal settlement

   0    175    0  

Basis difference in investment in Home business

   0    0    (1,960

Other permanent differences

   10    (3  8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

  $2,291   $2,589   $2,598  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Expected provision at federal statutory tax rate (35%)$5,567
 $6,041
 $6,878
State taxes, net of federal benefit133
 132
 (291)
Change in valuation allowance(641) (164) (65)
Foreign rate differential(2,482) (2,109) (2,624)
Federal research credit(433) (318) (407)
Basis difference in investment of Arris644
 0
 0
Other adjustments(49) 57
 (188)
Provision for income taxes$2,739
 $3,639
 $3,303
A retroactive and permanent reinstatement of the federal research credit was signed into law on December 18, 2015 in accordance with the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015. As such, our effective tax rate for 2015 reflects the benefit of the 2015 federal research and development tax credit.
A retroactive extension of the 2012 federal research and development credit was signed into law on January 2, 2013 in accordance with The American Taxpayer Act of 2012. The benefit of $189 million related to the 2012 federal research and development credit is included in the year ended December 31, 2013.
Our effective tax rate for 2015 included a discrete tax benefit related to refunds and reductions in uncertain tax positions due to the resolution of a multi-year tax audit in the U.S.
Our effective tax rate is impacted by earnings realized in foreign jurisdictions with statutory tax rates lower than the federal statutory tax rate. Substantially all of the income from foreign operations was earned by an Irish subsidiary.
We have not provided U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122015 because we intend to permanently reinvest such earnings outside the U.S. If these foreign earnings were to be repatriated in the future, the related U.S. tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes previously paid on these earnings. As of December 31, 2012,2015, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided is approximately $33.3$58.3 billion. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable.

On July 27, 2015, the United States Tax Court, in an opinion in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, invalidated the portion of the Treasury regulations issued under IRC Section 482 requiring related-party participants in a cost sharing arrangement to share stock-based compensation costs. The U.S. Tax Court issued the final decision on December 28, 2015. The government has 90 days from the final decision date to file a notice of appeal. At this time, the U.S. Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement to include stock-based compensation from its regulations. We have evaluated the opinion and have recorded a tax benefit of $3.5 billion related to reimbursement of cost share payments for the previously shared stock-based compensation costs. In addition, we have recorded a tax liability of $3.5 billion for the U.S. tax cost of potential repatriation of the associated contingent foreign earnings because at this time we cannot reasonably conclude that the Company has the ability and the intent to indefinitely reinvest these contingent earnings. The net impact to our consolidated financial statements is not material. We will continue to monitor developments related to the case and the potential impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Deferred Tax Assets

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in millions):

   As of December 31, 
   2011  2012 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Stock-based compensation expense

  $288   $311  

State taxes

   138    184  

Capital loss carryforward

   285    236  

Settlement with the Authors Guild and AAP

   35    28  

Vacation accruals

   52    67  

Deferred rent

   43    50  

Accruals and reserves not currently deductible

   268    688  

Acquired net operating losses

   156    505  

Tax credit

   55    274  

Basis difference in investment in Home business

   0    2,043  

Other

   11    128  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   1,331    4,514  

Valuation allowance

   (333  (2,629
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance

   998    1,885  

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

   (479  (761

Identified intangibles

   (398  (1,496

Unrealized gains on investments and other

   (90  (105

Other prepaids

   (70  (118

Other

   (33  (133
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (1,070  (2,613
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(72 $(728
  

 

 

  

 

 

 


92

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

 As of December 31,
 2014 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Stock-based compensation expense$376
 $534
State taxes133
 119
Investment loss133
 144
Legal settlement accruals175
 101
Accrued employee benefits671
 832
Accruals and reserves not currently deductible175
 245
Net operating losses207
 230
Tax credits262
 503
Basis difference in investment of Arris1,347
 1,357
Prepaid cost sharing0
 3,468
Other243
 337
Total deferred tax assets3,722
 7,870
Valuation allowance(1,659) (1,732)
Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance2,063
 6,138
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation and amortization(852) (1,126)
Identified intangibles(965) (787)
Mark-to-market investments(273) (93)
Renewable energy investments(430) (529)
Foreign earnings0
 (3,468)
Other(125) (73)
Total deferred tax liabilities(2,645) (6,076)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(582) $62
As of December 31, 2012,2015, our federal state and foreignstate net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $1,048 million, $333$482 million and $384$443 million. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 20172021 and the state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2013. The foreign net operating loss can be carried forward indefinitely, however it is more likely than not that it will not be realized, therefore we have recorded a full valuation allowance.2016. The net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various annual limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and similar limitations under the tax laws of the different jurisdictions. Our foreign jurisdictions.

net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were $263 million that can be carried over indefinitely.

As of December 31, 2012,2015, our California research and development credit carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $146$1,044 million that can be carried over indefinitely. We believe the state tax credit is not likely to be realized. Our foreign tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $223 million that will start to expire in 2025. We believe it is more likely than not that a portionall of the stateforeign tax credit will not be realized. Therefore,
As of December 31, 2015, we have recordedmaintained a valuation allowance onwith respect to certain of our deferred tax assets relating primarily to investment losses that are capital in nature, California deferred tax assets, and certain foreign net operating losses that we believe are not likely to be realized. We established a deferred tax asset for the statebook-to-tax basis difference in our investments in Arris shares received from the sale of the Motorola Home business to Arris in 2013. Since any future losses to be recognized upon the sale of Arris shares will be capital losses, a valuation allowance has been recorded against this deferred tax credit carryforward inasset to the amountextent such deferred tax asset is not covered by capital gains generated as of $130 million.2015. We will reassess the valuation allowance quarterly and if future evidence allows for a partial or full release of the valuation allowance, a tax benefit will be recorded accordingly.

As a result of December 31, 2012, our federal and state capital loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $483 million and $612 million. We also have deferred tax assets for impairment losses that, if recognized, will be capital in nature. We believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets for capital losses and impairment losses will not be realized. Therefore,the Altera opinion, we have recorded a valuation allowance on both our

federal and state deferred tax assets for these items in the amount of $205 million. We will reassess the valuation allowance quarterly and if future evidence allows for a partial or full release of the valuation allowance, a tax benefit will be recorded accordingly.

In December 2012, we entered into an agreement with Arris Group Inc. (Arris) for the disposition of the Motorola Home business. A deferred tax asset was established for the book to tax basis difference in our investment in the Motorola Home Business upon signing the agreement. When the disposition event actually occurs in the foreseeable future, some or all of the basis difference in the Home business will become$3.5 billion and a basis difference in Google’s investment in Arris. Since any future losses to be recognized upon sale of the Home business or Arris Shares will be capital losses and Google already has an excess capital loss carryforward, a full valuation allowance was recorded against this deferred tax asset. We will reassessliability of $3.5 billion. Refer to above for more details on the valuation allowance quarterly and if future evidence allows for a partial or full release of the valuation allowance, a tax benefit will be recorded accordingly.

Altera case.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 20102013 to December 31, 20122015 (in millions):

Balance as of January 1, 2010

  $1,188  

Increases related to prior year tax positions

   37  

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

   (197

Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities

   (47

Decreases as a result of a lapse of applicable statute of limitation

   (97

Increases related to current year tax positions

   256  
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   1,140  

Increases related to prior year tax positions

   77  

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

   (9

Increases related to current year tax positions

   361  

Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities

   (5
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   1,564  

Increases related to prior year tax positions

   43  

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

   (40

Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities

   (62

Increases related to acquisition

   17  

Increases related to current year tax positions

   411  
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   1,933  
  

 

 

 

Our


93

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Balance as of January 1, 2013$1,907
Increases related to prior year tax positions158
Decreases related to prior year tax positions(37)
Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities(78)
Increases related to current year tax positions552
Balance as of December 31, 20132,502
Increases related to prior year tax positions66
Decreases related to prior year tax positions(44)
Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities(1)
Increases related to current year tax positions771
Balance as of December 31, 20143,294
Increases related to prior year tax positions224
Decreases related to prior year tax positions(176)
Decreases related to settlement with tax authorities(27)
Increases related to current year tax positions852
Balance as of December 31, 2015$4,167
The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that,was $2,502 million, $3,294 million, and $4,167 million as of December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively, of which, $2,309 million, $2,909 million, and $3,614 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate were $951 million, $1,350 million, and $1,749 million as of December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012.

rate.

As of December 31, 20112014 and 2012,2015, we had accrued $129$239 million and $139$348 million for payment ofin interest and penalties. Interest and penalties included in our provision for income taxes were not materialtaxes.
We file income tax returns in all the periods presented.

We and our subsidiaries are routinely examined by various taxing authorities. Although we file U.S. federal U.S.jurisdiction and in many state and foreign tax returns,jurisdictions, our two major tax jurisdictions are the U.S. federal and Ireland. DuringWe are subject to the three months ended December 31, 2007,continuous examination of our income tax returns by the IRS and other tax authorities. The IRS completed its examination of our 2003 and 2004through 2006 tax years. Weyears; all issues have been settled except for one which we have filed an appeal with the IRS for certain issues related to this audit and settlements were reached in 2012 on all but one issue which we plan to litigate in court. As a result we released the related reserves in the three month ended December 31, 2012. The IRS is currently in examination of our 2007 2008, and 2009through 2012 tax years. We expect the examinationhave also received tax assessments in multiple foreign jurisdictions asserting transfer pricing adjustments or permanent establishment. We continue to be completed within the next 12 months, but we do not anticipatedefend any significant impact to our unrecognized tax benefit balanceand all such claims as of December 31, 2012, related to our 2007, 2008,presented.

Our 2013, 2014, and 2009 tax years.

Our 2010, 2011 and 20122015 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS for U.S. federal tax purposes, and our 20062011 through 20122015 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies for Irish tax purposes. There are various other ongoing audits in various other jurisdictions that are not material to our financial statements.

We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing discussions with tax authorities and the impact, if any, of the expected expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
We believe that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. However, the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in our tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management's expectations, we could be required to adjust our provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs. Although the timing of resolution, settlement, closure of audits is not certain, we do not believe it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will materially change in the next 12 months.

Note 15.16. Information about Segments and Geographic Areas

Prior to

In conjunction with the secondAlphabet reorganization, in the fourth quarter of 2012,2015, we implemented legal and operational changes in how our chiefChief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) manages our businesses, including resource allocation and performance assessment. Consequently, we have multiple operating decision makers (i.e.,segments, representing the chief executive officer and his direct reports) reviewed financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by geographic region for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As a resultindividual businesses run separately under the Alphabet structure.
Google is our only reportable segment. None of our Motorola acquisition inother segments meet the second quarter of 2012, our chiefquantitative thresholds to qualify as reportable segments; therefore, the operating decision makers review financial information forsegments are combined and disclosed below as Other Bets. All prior-period amounts have been adjusted retrospectively to reflect the following three operating segments:

reportable segment change.

Google—Our reported segments are described below:


94

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google – Google includes our main internet products such as Search, Ads, Commerce, Maps, YouTube, Apps, Cloud, Android, Chrome, Google Play as well as hardware products we sell, such as Chromecast, Chromebooks and Nexus. Our technical infrastructure and newer efforts like Virtual Reality are also included in Google. Google generates revenues primarily from advertising, sales of digital content, apps and cloud services, as well as sales of Google branded hardware.
Other Bets – Other Bets is a combination of multiple operating segments that are not individually material. Other Bets includes businesses such as Access/Google Fiber, Calico, Nest, Verily, GV, Google Capital, X, and other non-advertising businesses

initiatives. Revenues from the Other Bets is derived primarily through the sales of Nest hardware products, internet and TV services through Google Fiber and licensing and R&D services through Verily.

Mobile—includesRevenue, cost of revenue, and operating expenses are generally directly attributed to our mobile devices business acquired from Motorola

Home—includes our digital set-top box business acquired from Motorola

In December 2012,segments. Inter-segment revenues are not presented separately, as a result of an agreement for the disposition of the Home segment, the Home segment is presented as discontinued operations and therefore is not included in the segment report.

these amounts are immaterial. Our chief operating decision makers doCODM does not evaluate operating segments using asset information.

The following table sets forth revenues and operating income (loss) by operating segment (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010   2011   2012 

Google:

      

Revenues

  $29,321    $37,905    $46,039  

Income from operations

   11,757     14,216     16,308  

Mobile:

      

Revenues

   0     0     4,136  

Loss from operations

   0     0     (393

A reconciliation of

Information about segments during the total segment income from operations to the consolidated income from operations isperiods presented were as follows (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2011  2012 

Total segment income from operations

  $11,757   $14,216   $15,915  

Unallocated items

   (1,376  (2,474  (3,155
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated income from operations

  $10,381   $11,742   $12,760  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unallocated items, including stock-based

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Revenues:     
Google$55,507
 $65,674
 $74,541
Other Bets12
 327
 448
Total revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Segment operating income (loss):     
Google$16,260
 $19,011
 $23,425
Other Bets(527) (1,942) (3,567)
Reconciling items(1)
(330) (573) (498)
Total income from operations$15,403
 $16,496
 $19,360
(1)
Reconciling items are primarily related to corporate administrative costs and other miscellaneous items that are not allocated to individual segments.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Capital expenditures:     
Google$7,006
 $11,173
 $8,849
Other Bets187
 501
 869
Reconciling items(2)
165
 (715) 197
Total capital expenditures as presented in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow$7,358
 $10,959
 $9,915
(2)
Reconciling items are primarily related to timing differences of payments as segment capital expenditures are on accrual basis while total capital expenditures shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow are on cash basis, capital expenditures of Motorola Mobile and Home, and other miscellaneous differences.


95

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Stock-based compensation expense, restructuring and other charges related to our Mobiledepreciation, amortization and impairment are included in segment and a charge related to the resolution of a Department of Justice investigation, are not allocated to each segment because we do not include this information in our measurement of the performance of our operating segments.

income (loss) as below (in millions):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Stock-based compensation:     
Google$2,911
 $3,677
 $4,587
Other Bets124
 347
 498
Reconciling items(3)
92
 151
 118
Total stock based compensation, excluding discontinued operations(4)
$3,127
 $4,175
 $5,203
      
Depreciation, amortization and impairment:     
Google$3,668
 $4,778
 $4,839
Other Bets24
 148
 203
 Reconciling items(5)
247
 53
 21
Total depreciation, amortization and impairment as presented in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow$3,939
 $4,979
 $5,063
(3)
Reconciling items represent corporate administrative costs that are not allocated to individual segments.
(4)
For purposes of segment reporting, we define SBC as awards accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 718 that we expect to settle in stock. SBC does not include expenses related to awards that we will ultimately settle in cash. Amounts exclude SBC from discontinued operations.
(5)
Reconciling items primarily represent depreciation, amortization and impairment related to Motorola Mobile and Motorola Home.
Revenues by geography are based on the billing addresses of our customers for the Google segment and the ship-to-addresses of our customers for the Mobile segment.customers. The following tables set forth revenues and long-lived assets by geographic area (in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010   2011   2012 

Revenues:

      

United States

  $14,056    $17,560    $23,502  

United Kingdom

   3,329     4,057     4,872  

Rest of the world

   11,936     16,288     21,801  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $29,321    $37,905    $50,175  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 
   2011   2012 

Long-lived assets(1) :

    

United States

  $15,963    $20,985  

International

   3,853     12,359  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-lived assets

  $19,816    $33,344  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2014 2015
Revenues:     
United States$25,587
 $29,482
 $34,810
United Kingdom5,600
 6,483
 7,067
Rest of the world24,332
 30,036
 33,112
Total revenues$55,519
 $66,001
 $74,989
 As of
December 31, 2014
 As of
December 31, 2015
Long-lived assets:   
United States$37,421
 $43,686
International13,110
 13,661
Total long-lived assets$50,531
 $57,347
Note 17. Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements
In the second quarter of 2015, we identified an incorrect classification of certain revenues between legal entities, and as a consequence, we revised our income tax expense for periods beginning in 2008 through the first quarter of 2015 in the cumulative amount of $711 million. We have evaluated the materiality of the income tax expense impact quantitatively and qualitatively and concluded it was not material to any of the prior periods impacted and that correction of income tax expense as an out of period adjustment in the quarter ended June 30, 2015 is not material to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. Consolidated revenues are not impacted. We elected to revise previously issued consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods impacted to correct the effect of this immaterial income tax expense underaccrual for the corresponding periods.

96

(1)

Includes Home segment.

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.


The following table presents the impact of these corrections on affected Consolidated Balance Sheet line items as of December 31, 2014 (in millions):
 As of December 31, 2014
  
As Previously Reported (1)
 Adjustment As Revised
Selected Balance Sheets Data:     
Income tax receivable, net$1,298
 $(707) $591
Total current assets79,363
 (707) 78,656
Total assets129,894
 (707) 129,187
Income taxes payable, non-current3,407
 (67) 3,340
Retained earnings75,706
 (640) 75,066
Total stockholders' equity104,500
 (640) 103,860
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$129,894
 $(707) $129,187
(1)    Includes reclassifications of deferred tax assets and liabilities related to ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” Refer to Note 1 for further information.
The following table presents the impact of these corrections on affected Consolidated Statements of Income line items, including net income per share amounts for Class A and B common stock and Class C capital stock, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 (in millions, except per share amounts):
 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2014
  
As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Selected Statements of Income Data:           
Provision for income taxes$2,552
 $187
 $2,739
 $3,331
 $308
 $3,639
Net income from continuing operations13,347
 (187) $13,160
 13,928
 (308) $13,620
Net income12,920
 (187) $12,733
 14,444
 (308) $14,136
            
Basic net income per share from continuing operations$20.05
 $(0.28) $19.77
 $20.61
 $(0.46) $20.15
Basic net income per share19.41
 (0.28) 19.13
 21.37
 (0.46) 20.91
Diluted net income per share from continuing operations19.70
 (0.28) 19.42
 20.27
 (0.45) 19.82
Diluted net income per share$19.07
 $(0.28) $18.79
 $21.02
 $(0.45) $20.57
The following table presents the impact of these corrections on affected Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income line items for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2014
  
As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Selected Statements of Comprehensive Income Data:           
Net income12,920
 (187) 12,733
 14,444
 (308) 14,136
Comprehensive income12,507
 (187) 12,320
 14,346
 (308) 14,038


97

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The following table presents the impact of these corrections on affected Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows line items for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2014
  
As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised As Previously Reported Adjustment As Revised
Selected Statements of Cash Flows Data:           
Net income$12,920
 $(187) 12,733
 $14,444
 $(308) $14,136
Changes in income taxes, net401
 187
 588
 283
 308
 591
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Alphabet
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2012,2015, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20122015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.2015. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with our Audit Committee. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122015 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.


98

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Google
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with our Audit Committee. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

On February 11, 2016, we announced the appointment of James G. Campbell as our Alphabet Corporate Controller, effective February 16, 2016.
Jim, age 60, most recently held the position of Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller at Intel Corporation (from 2004 to 2016) where he was responsible for global accounting, financial services and financial reporting. Previously, Jim was based in Europe, responsible for Intel's international finance operations. He has also been manager of Intel's Financial Information Systems, responsible for designing, developing and implementing Intel's internally used financial applications. In addition, he has served as Asia regional audit manager, Microprocessor Group controller and European Controller. Jim was at Intel for over 30 years and also led and managed the international controllers responsible for financial services, statutory compliance and business support.
Jim received his bachelor's degree in business and accounting from California State University, Hayward. He holds a CPA license and is a member of the Financial Executives Committee on Corporate Reporting (CCR), the Executive Committee of CCR, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), the PCAOB Standing Advisory Group (Emeritus), the Portland State University Graduate School of Business Advisory Board and serves on the Board of Trustees Portland Chapter of World Affairs Council.

99

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

The material terms of Jim's compensation are as follows:
Salary: $475,000
Equity:
$3.5 million equity grant (Initial Grant) made shortly after hire vesting monthly over 12 months
$3.5 million equity grant to be made in Q1 2017, to start vesting monthly over 12 months upon the full vest of the Initial Grant
$250,000 sign-on bonus, subject to a pro-rated repayment if employment ends within the first 12 months
Jim will also be eligible to participate in the compensation and benefit programs generally available to Google's officers.
PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item will be included under the caption “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement for the 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (20132015 (2016 Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item regarding delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K will be included under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 20132016 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be included under the captions “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation” and “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the 20132016 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be included under the captions “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the 20132016 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be included under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Director Independence” in the 20132016 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be included under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the 20132016 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


100

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)We have filed the following documents as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(a)We have filed the following documents as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
1. Consolidated Financial Statements

52Financial Statements of Alphabet Inc.: 

Financial Statements:

54

55

56

57

58Financial Statements of Google Inc.: 

59

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Credits

  Balance at
Beginning of
Year
   Additions   Usage  Balance at
End of Year
 
   (In millions) 

Year ended December 31, 2010

  $79    $200    $(178 $101  

Year ended December 31, 2011

  $101    $214    $(182 $133  

Year ended December 31, 2012

  $133    $1,263    $(815 $581  

The table below details the activity of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the three years ended December 31, 2015 (in millions):
 
Balance at
Beginning of
Year
 Additions Usage 
Balance at
End of Year
 (In millions)
Year ended December 31, 2013$581
 $1,128
 $(1,078) $631
Year ended December 31, 2014$631
 $1,240
 $(1,646) $225
Year ended December 31, 2015$225
 $579
 $(508) $296
Note:Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are charged to expense. Additions to the allowance for sales credits are charged against revenues. For 2012,the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, additions included the impact from the Motorola acquisition. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, usages include the impact from the sale of Motorola Home and Mobile businesses, respectively.

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.

3. Exhibits

See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


101

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: January 29, 2013

February 11, 2016
GOOGLE INC.

By:

/S/    LARRY PAGE        

ALPHABET INC.
By:
/S/    LARRY PAGE        
 Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer of Alphabet Inc.)


POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Larry Page and Patrick Pichette,Ruth Porat, jointly and severally, his or her attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.





Signature

Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Title

Date

Signature

TitleDate
/S/    LARRY PAGE        

Larry Page

Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Officer of Alphabet Inc.)
February 11, 2016
Larry Page January 29, 2013
/S/    RUTH PORAT        

/S/    PATRICK PICHETTE        

Patrick Pichette

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Officer of Alphabet Inc.)
February 11, 2016
Ruth Porat January 29, 2013
/S/    ERIC E. SCHMIDT        
Executive ChairmanFebruary 11, 2016
Eric E. Schmidt
/S/    SERGEY BRIN        
President, Co-Founder and DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Sergey Brin
/S/    L. JOHN DOERR        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
L. John Doerr
/S/    DIANE B. GREENE        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Diane B. Greene
/S/    JOHN L. HENNESSY        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
John L. Hennessy
/S/   ANN MATHER       
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Ann Mather
/S/    ALAN R. MULALLY
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Alan R. Mulally
/S/    PAUL S. OTELLINI
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Paul S. Otellini
/S/    K. RAM SHRIRAM       
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
K. Ram Shriram
/S/    SHIRLEY M. TILGHMAN        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Shirley M. Tilghman


Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 11, 2016
GOOGLE INC.
By:
/S/    SUNDAR PICHAI        
Sundar Pichai
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer of Google Inc.)

POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Sundar Pichai and Ruth Porat, jointly and severally, his or her attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Signature

TitleDate
/S/    SUNDAR PICHAI        
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer of Google Inc.)February 11, 2016
Sundar Pichai
/S/    RUTH PORAT        
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Google Inc.)February 11, 2016
Ruth Porat
/S/    ERIC E. SCHMIDT        

Executive ChairmanFebruary 11, 2016
Eric E. Schmidt

 

Executive Chairman

/S/    LARRY PAGE        
Co-Founder and DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Larry Page January 29, 2013
/S/    SERGEY BRIN        
Co-Founder and DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Sergey Brin
/S/    L. JOHN DOERR        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
L. John Doerr
/S/    DIANE B. GREENE        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Diane B. Greene
/S/    JOHN L. HENNESSY        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
John L. Hennessy
/S/   ANN MATHER       
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Ann Mather
/S/    ALAN R. MULALLY
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Alan R. Mulally
/S/    PAUL S. OTELLINI
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Paul S. Otellini
/S/    K. RAM SHRIRAM       
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
K. Ram Shriram
/S/    SHIRLEY M. TILGHMAN        
DirectorFebruary 11, 2016
Shirley M. Tilghman



Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

EXHIBIT INDEX

/S/    SERGEY BRIN        

Sergey Brin

Co-Founder and Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    L. JOHN DOERR        

L. John Doerr

Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    DIANE B. GREENE        

Diane B. Greene

Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    JOHN L. HENNESSY        

John L. Hennessy

Director

January 29, 2013

/s/    ANN MATHER        

Ann Mather

Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    PAUL S. OTELLINI        

Paul S. Otellini

Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    K. RAM SHRIRAM        

K. Ram Shriram

Director

January 29, 2013

/S/    SHIRLEY M. TILGHMAN        

Shirley M. Tilghman

Director

January 29, 2013


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Number

 Description 

Description

Incorporated by reference herein

 

Form

 Date
1.012.01 FormAgreement and Plan of Distribution Agreement,Merger, dated April 20, 2007,October 2, 2015, by and among Google Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Citigroup Global MarketsAlphabet Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC (Distribution Agreement)Maple Technologies Inc. 

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File (File No. 000-50726)

000-36380) and Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)
 April 23, 2007October 2, 2015
1.01.13.01 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Alphabet Inc., dated October 2, 2015 Amendment
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1 to the Distribution Agreement among001-37580)

October 2, 2015
3.02Amended and Restated Bylaws of Alphabet Inc., dated October 2, 2015Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
3.03Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Google Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. entered into as of July 20, 2007 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726) August 9, 2007July 24, 2012
1.01.23.04 Amendment Agreement, dated asAmended and Restated Bylaws of July 12, 2011, among Google Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Management LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, UBS AG, London Branch, and UBS Securities LLC

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)

July 12, 2011
1.02Form of Bidding Rules Agreement, dated April 20, 2007, among Google Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as Auction Manager and Bidder, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as Warrant Agent and Bidder and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and UBS Securities LLC, as Bidders (Bidding Rules Agreement)

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)

April 23, 2007
1.02.1Amendment No. 1 to the Bidding Rules Agreement among Google Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Bidder entered into as of July 20, 2007 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726) August 9, 2007July 24, 2012
2.013.05 Certificate of Merger, dated October 2, 2015 Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Google Inc., RB98 Inc., and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., dated as of August 15, 2011

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File (File No. 000-50726)

000-36380)
 August 18, 2011
3.01Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of RegistrantQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)July 24, 2012
3.02Amended and Restated Bylaws of RegistrantQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)July 24, 2012
October 2, 2015
4.01 Specimen Class A Common Stock certificate Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-1, as amended8-K (File No. 333-114984)001-37580) August 18, 2004


Exhibit

Number

Description

Incorporated by reference herein

Form

Date
October 2, 2015
4.02 Form of Warrant Agreement, dated April 20, 2007, among Google Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as Warrant Agent, and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Management LLC, and UBS AG, London Branch, as Warrantholders (Warrant Agreement)Specimen Class C Capital Stock certificate Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726)001-37580) April 23, 2007
4.02.1Amendment No. 1 to the Warrant Agreement among Google Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Warrantholder entered into as of July 20, 2007Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)August 9, 2007
October 2, 2015
4.03 Indenture, dated as of May 19, 2011 between Google Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee 

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)


 May 19, 2011
4.04 
Form of 2.125% Note due 2016

 Form of 1.250% Note due 2014

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)

 May 19, 2011
4.05 
Form of 3.625% Note due 2021

 Form of 2.125% Note due 2016

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)

 May 19, 2011
4.06 Form of 3.625%3.375% Note due 2021

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 000-50726)

May 19, 2011
4.07©Deferred Compensation PlanRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-175180)June 28, 2011
4.07.1©Amendment No. 1 to the Deferred Compensation Plan

Annual Report on Form 10-K

(File No. 000-50726)

January 26, 2012
10.01Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Registrant, its affiliates and its directors and officersRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)July 12, 2004
10.02©Google Executive Bonus Plan2024 Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726) February 25, 2014
4.07Alphabet Inc. Deferred Compensation PlanCurrent Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
4.08
Terms of Revised Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement of In Re: Google Inc. Class C Shareholder Litigation (Consol. C.A. No. 7469-CS)
Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-36380) March 28, 200726, 2014
10.034.09 ©Transfer Restriction Agreement, dated October 2, 2015, between Alphabet Inc. and Larry Page and certain of his affiliates LetterCurrent Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
4.10Transfer Restriction Agreement, dated August 16, 2005,October 2, 2015, between Shirley M. TilghmanAlphabet Inc. and Sergey Brin and certain of his affiliates
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)

October 2, 2015
4.11Transfer Restriction Agreement, dated October 2, 2015, between Alphabet Inc. and Eric E. Schmidt and certain of its affiliates
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)

October 2, 2015
4.12Class C Undertaking, dated October 2, 2015, executed by Alphabet Inc.Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
10.01Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Alphabet Inc., its affiliates and its directors and officersCurrent Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
10.02uOffer Letter, dated March 20, 2015, between Ruth Porat and Google Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726)001-36380) March 26, 2015


October 6, 2005
Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

10.04
Exhibit
Number
 ©Description Offer Letter,Incorporated by reference herein
FormDate
10.03uCompensation Plan Agreement, dated June 6, 2008,October 2, 2015, between Patrick PichetteGoogle Inc. and GoogleAlphabet Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 00050726)000-36380) and Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580) June 25, 2008October 2, 2015
10.04u
10.05©LetterDirector Arrangements Agreement, dated January 11, 2012,October 2, 2015, between Diane B. GreeneGoogle Inc. and GoogleAlphabet Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 00050726)January 12, 2012
10.06©Agreement dated April 27, 2012, between Nikesh Arora000-36380) and Google Inc.Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 00050726)001-37580) April 30, 2012October 2, 2015
10.05u
10.07©1998Google Restricted Stock Plan, as amendedUnit Agreement, dated September 9, 2015, between Google Inc. and Omid Kordestani Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)001-36380) August 9, 2006


October 29, 2015

Exhibit

Number

10.06
u

Description

Incorporated by reference herein

Form

Date
10.07.1©1998 Stock Plan—Form of stock option agreementRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)April 29, 2004
10.08©2000 Stock Plan, as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)August 9, 2006
10.08.1©2000 Stock Plan—Form of stock option agreementRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)April 29, 2004
10.09©2003 Stock Plan, as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)May 10, 2007
10.09.1©2003 Stock Plan—Form of stock option agreementRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)April 29, 2004
10.10©2003 Stock Plan (No. 2), as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)May 10, 2007
10.10.1©2003 Stock Plan (No. 2)—Form of stock option agreementRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)April 29, 2004
10.11©2003 Stock Plan (No. 3), as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)May 10, 2007
10.11.1©2003 Stock Plan (No. 3)—Form of stock option agreementRegistration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-114984)April 29, 2004
10.12©Google Inc. 2004 Stock Plan, as amended Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726) June 7, 2011
10.06.1u
10.12.1©Google Inc. 2004 Stock Plan—FormPlan-Form of stock option agreementStock Option Agreement Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-50726) March 30, 2005
10.06.2u
10.12.2©Google Inc. 2004 Stock Plan—FormPlan-Form of restricted stock unit agreementRestricted Stock Unit Agreement Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-50726) March 30, 2005
10.06.3u
10.12.3©Google Inc. 2004 Stock Plan—AmendmentPlan-Amendment to stock option agreementsStock Option Agreements Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-142243) April 20, 2007
10.07u
10.12.4©2004 Stock Plan—Form of stock option agreement (TSO Program)Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-142243)April 20, 2007
10.13©GoogleAlphabet Inc. 2012 Stock Plan 

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 333-00050726)

 June 26, 2012
10.07.1
u*
10.14©GoogleAlphabet Inc. 2012 Incentive CompensationStock Plan for Employees and Consultants- Form of Motorola Mobility

Current Report on Form 8-K

(File No. 333-00050726)

Alphabet Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
  June 26, 2012 
10.08
10.15©uMotorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-181661) May 24, 2012
10.09
10.16©uAdMob, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan and UK Sub-Plan of the AdMob, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed (File No. 333-167411) June 9, 2010
10.10
10.17©Applied Semantics, Inc. 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)August 9, 2006
10.18©uClick Holding Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-149956) March 28, 2008
10.19©Keyhole, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as amendedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50726)August 9, 2006


Exhibit

Number

Description

Incorporated by reference herein

Form

Date
10.20©Picasa, Inc. Employee Bonus PlanRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119378)September 29, 2004
10.21©YouTube, Inc. 2005 Stock PlanRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-138848)November 20, 2006
10.22Letter from Google Inc. to U.S. FTCCurrent Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726)January 3, 2013
10.23Agreement containing consent order regarding Motorola Mobility LLC and Google Inc.Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50726)January 3, 2013
12*Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charge Ratios  
14.01Code of Conduct of Alphabet Inc. dated October 2, 2015Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37580)October 2, 2015
21.01*Subsidiaries of the RegistrantRegistrants  
23.01*Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  
24.01*Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K)  
31.01*Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Alphabet Inc. pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
31.02*Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Alphabet Inc. pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  


Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc.

Exhibit
Number
DescriptionIncorporated by reference herein
FormDate
31.03*Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Google Inc. pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.04*Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Google Inc. pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.01Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alphabet Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  
32.02Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Google Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS XBRL Instance Document  
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document  
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document  
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document  
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document  
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document  
_________________

©uIndicates management compensatory plan, contract, or arrangement.
*Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.