UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 201227, 2014

orOr

For the transition period from                  to                 

Commission File Number: 0-21238

Landstar System, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(904) 398-9400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files):    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,392,435,000$2,819,920,000 (based on the per share closing price on June 30, 2012,28, 2014, the last business day of the Company’s second fiscal quarter, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market). In making this calculation, the registrant has assumed, without admitting for any purpose, that all directors and executive officers of the registrant, and no other persons, are affiliates.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), outstanding as of the close of business on January 25, 201323, 2015 was 46,494,114.44,794,486.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following document are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K as indicated herein:

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.

20122014 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

General

Landstar System, Inc. was incorporated in January 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware. It acquired all of the capital stock of its predecessor, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. (“LSHI”) on March 28, 1991. Landstar System, Inc. has been a publicly held company since its initial public offering in March 1993. LSHI owns directly or indirectly all of the common stock of Landstar Ranger, Inc. (“Landstar Ranger”), Landstar Inway, Inc. (“Landstar Inway”), Landstar Ligon, Inc. (“Landstar Ligon”), Landstar Gemini, Inc. (“Landstar Gemini”), Landstar Transportation Logistics, Inc. (“Landstar Transportation Logistics”), Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. (“Landstar Global Logistics”), Landstar Express America, Inc. (“Landstar Express America”), Landstar Canada Holdings, Inc. (“LCHI”), Landstar Canada, Inc. (“Landstar Canada”), Landstar Contractor Financing, Inc. (“LCFI”), Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. (“RMCS”), Landstar Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. (“LSCS”), Landstar Supply Chain Solutions LLC (“LSCSLLC”) and Signature Insurance Company (“Signature”). Landstar Ranger, Landstar Inway, Landstar Ligon, Landstar Gemini, Landstar Transportation Logistics, Landstar Global Logistics, Landstar Express America LSCS, LSCSLLC and Landstar Canada are collectively herein referred to as Landstar’s “Operating Subsidiaries.” Landstar System, Inc., LSHI, LCFI, RMCS, LCHI, Signature and the Operating Subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “Landstar” or the “Company,” unless the context otherwise requires. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 13410 Sutton Park Drive South, Jacksonville, Florida 32224 and its telephone number is (904) 398-9400. The Company makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, proxy and current reports on Form 8-K as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s website is www.landstar.com. You may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 E. Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reading Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains the Company’s current and periodic reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically with the SEC.

On December 28, 2013, the Company completed the sale of Landstar Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, including its wholly owned subsidiary, Landstar Supply Chain Solutions LLC (collectively, “LSCS”), to XPO Logistics, Inc. (“XPO”). The gain on the sale of LSCS and the operating results of LSCS for fiscal year 2013 and prior periods have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to discontinued operations.

Description of Business

Landstar is a non-asset basedan asset-light provider of freightintegrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions. The Company offers services to its customers across multiple transportation modes, with the ability to arrange for individual shipments of freight to enterprise-wide solutions to manage all of a customer’s transportation and logistics needs. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and other countries around the world. The Company’s services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of independent commission sales agents and third party capacity providers linked together by a series of technological applications which are provided and coordinated by the Company. Landstar markets its freight transportation services and supply chain solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport and store customers’ freight. The nature of the Company’s business is such that a significant portion of its operating costs varies directly with revenue.

Landstar markets its freightintegrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents whoand exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity

providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under non-exclusive contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers railroads and independent warehouse capacity providers (“Warehouse Capacity Owners”).railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s information technology systems, Landstar operates aan integrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $2.8$3.2 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.

Transportation Logistics Segment

The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload and less-than-truckload transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited ground and air delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, project cargo and customs brokerage. Supply chain solutions are based on advanced technology solutions utilizing intellectual property that may be owned by the Company or licensed from third parties. Such solutions as offered by the Company may include integrated multi-modal solutions, outsourced logistics, supply chain engineering and warehousing. Industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive products, lumber and building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics, ammunition and explosives and military equipment. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including logistics and less-than-truckload service providers. Each of the Company’s independent commission sales agents has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment. FreightBillings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the physical transportation of freight. Supply chain solutions customersfreight and are generally charged fees for the services provided. Revenue recognized by the transportation logistics segment when providing capacity to customers to haul their freight is referred to herein as “transportation services revenue” and revenue for freight management services recognized on a fee-for-service basis is referred to herein as “transportation management fees.”transportation revenue. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for the amount of revenue from external customers, measure of profit and total assets attributable to the transportation logistics segment for the last three fiscal years.

Truck Services.    The transportation logistics segment’s truck transportation services include a full array of truckload transportation for a wide range of commodities, much of which are transported over irregular or non-repetitive routes, and, to a lesser degree, less-than-truckload transportation services. The Company utilizes a broad assortment of equipment, including dry and specialty vans of various sizes, unsidedunsided/platform trailers (including flatbeds, drop decks and light specialty trailers), temperature-controlled vans and containers. Available truck transportation services also include short-to-long haul movement of containers by truck and expedited ground and dedicated power-only truck capacity. During fiscal year 2012,2014, revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers was 49%48% and 43%46%, respectively, of totalconsolidated revenue. Also, during fiscal year 2014, truck transportation revenue hauled via van equipment and unsided/platform trailing equipment was 60% and 37%, respectively, of truck transportation revenue and less-than-truckload revenue was 3% of truck transportation revenue. The Company’s truck services contributed 92%94% of totalconsolidated revenue in each2014 and 93% of consolidated revenue in both fiscal year 2012, 2011years 2013 and 2010.2012.

Rail Intermodal Services.The transportation logistics segment has contracts with Class 1 domestic and Canadian railroads, certain short-line railroads and most major asset-based intermodal equipment providers, including agreements with stacktrain operators and container and trailing equipment companies. In addition, the transportation logistics segment has contracts with a vast network of local trucking companies that handle pick-up and delivery of rail freight. These contracts provide the transportation logistics segment the ability to transport freight via rail throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. The transportation logistics segment’s rail intermodal service capabilities include trailer on flat car, container on flat car, box car and railcar. The transportation logistics segment’s rail intermodal services contributed 3% of totalconsolidated revenue in each of fiscal year 2012, 2011years 2014, 2013 and 2010.2012.

Air and Ocean Services.The transportation logistics segment has contracts with domestic and international airlines and ocean lines. These contracts give the transportation logistics segment the capability to provideprovides domestic and international air services and international ocean services to its customers. The transportation logistics segmentCompany executes international freight transportation as an International Air Transport Association (IATA) certified Indirect Air Carrier (IAC) and, a Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) licensed non-vessel operating common carrier (NVOCC). The transportation logistics segment also provides international freight transportation solutions and as a licensed freight

forwarder. Through its network of independent commission sales agents, and relationships within a global network of foreign freight forwarders and contracts with a number of airlines and ocean lines, the transportation logistics segment provides efficient and cost effective door-to-door transportation to most points in the world for a vast

array of cargo types such as over-sized break bulk, consolidations, full container loads and refrigerated.refrigerated freight. The transportation logistics segment’s air and ocean services contributed 2% of consolidated revenue in 2014 and 3% of totalconsolidated revenue in each ofboth fiscal year 2012, 2011years 2013 and 2010.

Supply Chain Services.    The transportation logistics segment offers customers technology-based supply chain solutions and other value-added services on a fee-for-service basis and these services are also often provided in conjunction with the Company’s transportation service offerings. Service capabilities include logistics order management, shipment planning and optimization, rate management, transportation sourcing, in-transit visibility and shipment execution. The transportation logistics segment also offers warehousing solutions that provide customers with nationwide access to available warehouse capacity utilizing a network of independently owned and operated regional warehouse facilities without Landstar owning or leasing facilities or hiring employees to work at warehouses. The transportation logistics segment’s transportation management fee services contributed 1% of total revenue in each of fiscal year 2012, 2011 and 2010.2012.

Insurance Segment

The insurance segment is comprised of Signature, a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary, and RMCS. This segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance directly to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk of loss is ultimately borne by the Company.Signature. Revenue at the insurance segment represented approximately 1% of the Company’s totalconsolidated revenue in each of fiscal year 2012, 2011years 2014, 2013 and 2010.2012. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for the amount of revenue from external customers, measure of profit and total assets attributable to the insurance segment for the last three fiscal years.

Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations

Management believes the following factors are particularly significant to the Company’s operations:

Agent Network

The Company’s primary day-to-day contact with its customers is through its network of independent commission sales agents and, to a lesser extent, through employees of the Company. The typical Landstar independent commission sales agent maintains a relationship with a number of shippers and services these shippers utilizing the Company’s network of information technology systems and the various modes of transportation made available through the Company’s network of third party capacity providers. The Company provides assistance to the agents in developing additional relationships with shippers and enhancing agent and Company relationships with larger shippers through the Company’s field employees, located throughout the United States and to a lesser degree, in Canada. The Operating Subsidiaries emphasizeprovide programs to support the agents’ operations and to provide guidance on establishing pricing parameters for freight hauled by the various modes of transportation available to the agents. It is important to note that the Operating Subsidiaries, and not the Company’s agents, contract directly with customers and generally assume the related credit risk and potential liability for freight losses or damages when the Company is providing transportation services as a motor carrier.

Management believes the Company has more independent commission sales agents than any other non-asset basedasset-light integrated transportation and logistics servicesmanagement solutions company. Landstar’s vast network of independent commission sales agent locations provides the Company regular contact with shippers at the local level and the capability to be highly responsive to shippers’ changing needs. The Company’s large fleet of available capacity provides the agent network the resources needed to service both large and small shippers. Through its agent network, the Company offers smaller shippers a level of service comparable to that typically enjoyed only by larger

customers. Examples include the ability to provide transportation services on short notice, (often within hours of notification to time of pick-up), multiple pick-up and delivery points, electronic data interchange capability and access to specialized equipment. In addition, a number of the Company’s agents specialize in certain types of freight and transportation services (such as oversized or heavy loads and/or rail, air and international freight transportation). Each independent commission sales agent has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment.

The independent commission sales agents use a variety of proprietary and third party information technology applications depending on the mode of transportation, provided by the Company to service the requirements of shippers. For trucktruckload services, the Company’s independent commission sales agents use Landstar proprietary software which enables

agents to enter available freight, dispatch capacity and process most administrative procedures and then communicate that information to Landstar and its capacity providers via the internet. The Company’s web-based available truck information system provides a listing of available truck capacity to the Company’s independent commission sales agents. For modes of transportation other than trucking,truckload, the independent commission sales agents utilize mostlyboth proprietary and third party information technology applications provided by the Company.

Commissions to agents are based on contractually agreed-upon percentages of revenue or net revenue, defined as revenue less the cost of purchased transportation, or net revenue less a contractually agreed upon percentage of revenue retained by Landstar. Commissions to agents as a percentage of consolidated revenue will vary directly with fluctuations in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by the various modes of transportation the amount of transportation management fee revenue and revenue from the insurance segmentreinsurance premiums and with changes in net revenue margin, defined as net revenue divided by revenue, on services provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads, air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers. Commissions to agents are recognized upon the completion of freight delivery.

The Company reported 504had 525 and 478 agents who each generated at least $1 million each in Landstar revenue in both 2012during 2014 and 20112013, respectively, (the “Million Dollar Agents”). Landstar revenue from the Million Dollar Agents in the aggregate represented 90%92% of consolidated revenue in 2014 and 91% of total Landstarconsolidated revenue in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Historically,2013. Annually, the Company has experienced very low turnover in the numberfew terminations of its Million Dollar Agents, as annual turnover inwhether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Annual terminations of Million Dollar Agents are typically 3% or less of the total number of Million Dollar Agents is typically less than 3%.Agents. Management believes that the majority of the Million Dollar Agents choose to represent the Company exclusively.

Third Party Capacity

The Company relies exclusively on independent third parties for its hauling capacity other than for trailing equipment owned or leased by the Company and utilized primarily by the BCO Independent Contractors. These third party transportation capacity providers consist of BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers, air and ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Landstar’s use of capacity provided by third parties allows it to maintain a lower level of capital investment, resulting in lower fixed costs. During the most recently completed fiscal year,2014, revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and railroads represented 49%approximately 48%, 43%46% and 3%, respectively, of the Company’s totalconsolidated revenue. Collectively, transportation services revenue hauled by air and ocean cargo carriers represented 3%approximately 2% of the Company’s totalconsolidated revenue during the most recently completed fiscal year. Transportation management fees represented 1% of the Company’s total revenue in the most recently completed fiscal year.2014. Historically, the gross profit margin (defined as gross profit, which is defined as revenue less the cost of purchased transportation and commissions to agents, divided by revenue) generated from freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors has been greater than that from freight hauled by other third party capacity providers. However, the Company’s insurance and claims costs and other operating costs are incurred primarily in support of BCO Independent Contractor capacity. In addition, as further described in the “Corporate Services” section that follows, the Company incurs significantly higher selling, general and administrative costs in support of BCO Independent Contractor capacity as compared to the other modes of transportation. Purchased transportation costs are recognized upon the completion of freight delivery.

BCO Independent Contractors.    Management believes the Company has the largest fleet of truckload BCO Independent Contractors in the United States. BCO Independent Contractors provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements. Each BCO Independent Contractor operates under the motor carrier operating authority issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) to Landstar’s Operating Subsidiary to which such BCO Independent Contractor provides services and has leased his or her services and equipment. The Company’s network of BCO Independent Contractors provides marketing, operating, safety, recruiting, retention and financial advantages to the Company.

The Company’s BCO Independent Contractors are compensated primarily based on a fixedcontractually agreed-upon percentage of the revenue generated from the freightby delivered loads they haul. This percentage generally ranges from 62% to 73% where the BCO Independent Contractor provides only a tractor and 72% to 75%77% where the BCO

Independent Contractor provides both a tractor and trailing equipment. The BCO Independent Contractor must pay substantially all of the expenses of operating his/her equipment, including driver wages and benefits, fuel, physical damage insurance, maintenance, highway use taxes and debt service, if applicable. The Company passes 100% of fuel surcharges billed to customers for freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors to its BCO Independent Contractors. During 2012,2014, the Company billed customers $295.2$279.3 million in fuel surcharges and passed 100% of such fuel surcharges to the BCO Independent Contractors. These fuel surcharges are excluded from revenue.

The Company maintains an internet siteinternet-based applications for mobile and desktop devices through which BCO Independent Contractors can view a comprehensive listing of the Company’s available freight, allowing them to consider rate, size, origin and destination when planning trips. The Landstar Contractors’ Advantage Purchasing Program (LCAPP) leverages Landstar’s purchasing power to provide discounts to eligible BCO Independent Contractors when they purchase equipment, fuel, tires and other items. In addition, LCFI provides a source of funds at competitive interest rates to the BCO Independent Contractors to purchase primarily trailing equipment and mobile communication equipment.

The number of trucks provided to the Company by BCO Independent Contractors was 8,5238,932 at December 29, 2012,27, 2014, compared to 8,3718,432 at December 31, 2011.28, 2013. At December 29, 2012, 97%27, 2014, 98% of the trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors were provided by BCO Independent Contractors who provided five or fewer trucks to the Company. The number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors fluctuates daily as a result of truck recruiting and truck terminations. TrucksMore trucks were recruited in fiscal year 2014 than in fiscal year 2013 and trucks terminated were both lower in 2012fiscal year 2014 than in 2011,fiscal year 2013, resulting in a net gain of 152500 trucks during 2012.fiscal year 2014. Landstar’s BCO Independent Contractor truck turnover was approximately 24%22% in 2012fiscal year 2014 compared to 27% in 2011.fiscal year 2013. Approximately 40%37% of 20122014 turnover was attributable to BCO Independent Contractors who had been with the Company for less than one year. Management believes that factors that have historically favorably impacted turnover include the Company’s extensive agent network, available freight, the Company’s programs to reduce the operating costs of its BCO Independent Contractors and Landstar’s reputation for quality, service, reliability and financial strength.

Truck Brokerage Carriers.    At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company maintained a database of over 31,00038,000 approved Truck Brokerage Carriers who provide truck hauling capacity to the Company. Truck Brokerage Carriers provide truck capacity to the Company under non-exclusive contractual arrangements and each operates under theirits own DOT-issued motor carrier operating authority. Truck Brokerage Carriers are paid either a negotiated rate for each load they haulhauled or, to a lesser extent, a contractually agreed-upon amountfixed rate per load. The Company recruits, approves, establishes contracts with and tracks safety ratings and service records of and generally maintains the relationships with these third party trucking companies. In addition to providing additional capacity to the Company, the use of Truck Brokerage Carriers enables the Company to pursue different types and quality of freight such as temperature-controlled, short-haul traffic and less-than-truckload and, in certain instances, lower-priced freight that generally would not be handled by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors.

The Company maintains an internet site through which Truck Brokerage Carriers can view a listing of the Company’s freight that is available to them to be hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers.hauled. The Landstar Savings Plus Program leverages Landstar’s purchasing power to provide discounts to eligible Truck Brokerage Carriers when they purchase fuel and equipment and provides the Truck Brokerage Carriers with an electronic payment option.

Railroads and Air and Ocean Cargo Carriers.    The Company has contracts with Class 1 domestic and Canadian railroads, certain short-line railroads and domestic and international airlines and ocean lines. These relationships allow the Company to pursue the freight best serviced by these forms of transportation capacity. Railroads and air and oceanare paid either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Air cargo carriers are generally paid a negotiated rate for each load hauled. Ocean cargo carriers are generally paid contractually agreed-upon fixed amountrates per load. The Company also contracts with other third party capacity providers, such as air charter service providers, when required by specific customer needs.

Warehouse Capacity Owners.    The Company has contracts with Warehouse Capacity Owners throughout the United States. The services available to the Company’s customers provided from the warehouse capacity network include storage, order fulfillment, repackaging, labeling, inventory consolidations, sub-assembly and temperature and climate options. In general, Warehouse Capacity Owners are paid a fixed percentage of the gross revenue for storage and services provided through their warehouse. Warehouse storage and services revenue is reported net of the amount earned by the Warehouse Capacity Owner. Historically, warehousing services have not been a significant contributor to revenue or earnings. However, management believes that this service offering and relationships with Warehouse Capacity Owners provide the Company with additional transportation services opportunities.

Trailing Equipment

The Company offers its customers a large and diverse fleet of trailing equipment. Specialized services offered by the Company include those provided by a large fleet of flatbed trailers and multi-axle trailers capable of hauling extremely heavy or oversized loads. Management believes the Company, along with its network of capacity providers, offers the largest fleet of heavy/specialized trailing equipment in the United States.

The following table illustrates the mix of the trailing equipment as of December 29, 2012,27, 2014, either provided by the BCO Independent Contractors or owned or leased by the Company and made available primarily to BCO Independent Contractors. In general, Truck Brokerage Carriers utilize their own trailing equipment when providing transportation services on behalf of Landstar. Truck Brokerage Carrier trailing equipment is not included in the following table:

Specialized services offered by the Company include those provided by a large fleet of flatbed trailers and multi-axle trailers capable of hauling extremely heavy or oversized loads. Management believes the Company, along with its network of capacity providers, offers the largest fleet of heavy/specialized trailing equipment in the United States.

At December 29, 2012, 8,49527, 2014, 8,953 of the trailers available to the BCO Independent Contractors were owned by the Company and 382852 were leased. In addition, at December 29, 2012, 4,09027, 2014, 3,927 trailers were provided by the BCO Independent Contractors.

Customers

The Company’s customer base is highly diversified and dispersed across many industries, commodities and geographic regions. The Company’s top 100 customers accounted for approximately 44%42% and 41%, respectively, of the Company’sconsolidated revenue during each of fiscal year 2012years 2014 and 2011.2013. Management believes that the Company’s overall size, technological applications, geographic coverage, access to equipment and diverse service capability offer the Company significant competitive marketing and operating advantages. These advantages allow the Company to meet the needs of even the largest shippers. Larger shippers often consider reducing the number of authorized carriers they use in favor of a small number of “core carriers,” such as the Company, whose size and diverse service capabilities enable these core carriers to satisfy most of the shippers’ transportation needs. The Company’s national account customers include the United States Department of Defense and many of the

companies included in the Fortune 500. Large shippers are also using third party logistics providers (“3PLs”) to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs. The Company’s supply chain solutions services provide shippers the opportunity to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs and provide these shippers the opportunity to utilize the significant amount of capacity available from the Company. 3PLs and other transportation companies also utilize the Company’s available transportation capacity to satisfy their obligations to their shippers. There were 1110 transportation service providers, including 3PLs, included in the Company’s top 25 customers for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012.2014. Management believes the Company’s network of agents and third party capacity providers allows it to efficiently attract and service smaller shippers which may not be as desirable to other large transportation providers (see above under “Agent Network”). No customer accounted for more than 5%3% of the Company’s 20122014 revenue.

Technology

Management believes leadership in the development and application of information technology systems technology is an ongoing part of providing high quality service. Landstar focuses on providing integrated transportation management solutions which emphasize customer service at competitive prices.and information coordination among its independent commission sales agents, customers and capacity providers. The Company continues to focus on identifying, purchasing or developing and implementing software applications which are designed to improve its operational and administrative efficiency, assist its independent commission sales agents in sourcing capacity and pricing

transportation services, assist customers in meeting their supply chaintransportation needs and assist its third party capacity providers in identifying desirable freight. Landstar focuses on providing transportation services and supply chain solutions which emphasize customer service and information coordination among its independent commission sales agents, customers and capacity providers. The Company offers customers technology-based supply chain solutions and other value-added services. These services provide the Company with the ability to offer customers complete enterprise solutions and compete in the freight management segment of the transportation industry. Landstar intends to continue to purchase or develop appropriateimprove its systems and technologies that offer integrated transportation and logistics solutions to meet the total needs of its customers.agents, customers and third party capacity providers.

The Company’s information technology systems used in connection with its operations are located in Jacksonville, Florida and, to a lesser extent, in Rockford, Illinois and Southfield, Michigan.Illinois. In addition, the Company utilizes several third party data centers throughout the U.S. Landstar relies, in the regular course of its business, on the proper operation of its information technology systems.

Corporate Services

The Company provides many administrative support services to its network of independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers and customers. Management believes that the technological applications purchased or developed and maintained by the Company and its administrative support services provide operational and financial advantages to its independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers and customers. These, in turn, enhance the operational and financial efficiency of all aspects of the network.

Administrative support services that provide operational and financial advantages to the network include customer contract administration, customer credit review and approvals, sales administration and pricing, customer billing, accounts receivable collections, third party capacity payment, safety and operator and equipment compliance management, insurance claims handling, coordination of vendor discount programs and third party capacity quality programs. The Company also provides marketingMarketing and advertising strategies.

Managementstrategies are also believes that significant advantages result from the collective expertise and corporate services provided by Landstar’s corporate management.the Company. The primary functions provided by management include financeCompany’s practices of accepting customer credit risk and treasury services, accounting, strategic initiatives, budgeting, taxes, legal, corporate communicationspaying its agents and human resource management.carriers promptly provides a significant competitive advantage to the Company.

Competition

Landstar competes primarily in the transportation and logistics services industry with truckload carriers, third party logistics companies, intermodal transportation and logistics service providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers and other non-asset basedasset-light transportation and logistics service providers. The transportation and logistics services industry is extremely competitive and fragmented.

Management believes that competition for freight transported by the Company is based on service, efficiency and freight rates, which are influenced significantly by the economic environment, particularly the amount of available transportation capacity and freight demand. Management believes that Landstar’s overall size and availability of a wide range of equipment, together with its geographically dispersed local independent agent network and wide range of service offerings, present the Company with significant competitive advantages over many transportation and logistics service providers.

Self-Insured Claims

Potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. For commercial trucking claims, Landstar retains liability up to $5,000,000 per occurrence. The Company also retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $1,000,000, $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Regulation

Certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are considered motor carriers and/or brokers authorized to arrange for transportation services by motor carriers which are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (the “FMCSA”) and by various state agencies. The FMCSA has broad regulatory powers with respect to activities such as motor carrier operations, practices, periodic financial reporting and insurance. Subject to federal and state regulatory authorities or regulation, the Company’s capacity providers may transport most types of freight to and from any point in the United States over any route selected.

Interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety requirements prescribed by the FMCSA. Each driver, whether a BCO Independent Contractor or Truck Brokerage Carrier, is required to have a commercial driver’s license and may be subject to mandatory drug and alcohol testing. The FMCSA’s commercial driver’s license and drug and alcohol testing requirements have not adversely affected the Company’s ability to source the capacity necessary to meet its customers’ transportation needs.

In addition, certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are licensed as ocean transportation intermediaries by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission as non-vessel-operating common carriers and/or as ocean freight forwarders. The Company’s air transportation activities in the United States are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation as an indirect air carrier. One of the Operating Subsidiaries is licensed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) as a customs broker. The Company is also subject to regulations and requirements relating to safety and security promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through U.S. Customs and the Transportation Security Administration, the Canada Border Services Agency and various state and local agencies and port authorities.

The transportation industry is subject to possible other regulatory and legislative changes (such as the possibility of more stringent environmental, climate change and/or safety/security regulations or limits on vehicle

weight and size) that may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or by changing the demand for motor carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services.

In addition, because the U.S. government is one of the Company’s customers, the Company must comply with and is affected by laws and regulations relating to doing business with the federal government.

Seasonality

Landstar’s operations are subject to seasonal trends common to the trucking industry. Results of operations for the quarter ending in March are typically lower than for the quarters ending in June, September and December.

Employees

As of December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,3691,211 individuals. Approximately 117 Landstar Ranger drivers (out of a Company total of 8,5238,932 drivers for BCO Independent Contractors) are members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.

Increased severity or frequency of accidents and other claims.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business —Factors— Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Self-Insured Claims,” potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. For commercial trucking claims, Landstar retains liability up to $5,000,000 per occurrence. The Company also retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $1,000,000, $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material

increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Dependence on third party insurance companies.    The Company is dependent on a limited number of third party insurance companies to provide insurance coverage in excess of its self-insured retention amounts. Historically, the Company has maintained insurance coverage for commercial trucking claims in excess of specific per occurrence limits, up to various maximum amounts, with a limited number of third party insurance companies. In an attempt to manage the cost of insurance and claims, the Company has historically increased or decreased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims on a per occurrence basis by increasing or decreasing its level of self-insured retention based on the estimated cost differential between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical losses experienced by the Company at various levels of self-insured retention. To the extent that the third party insurance companies propose increases to their premiums for coverage of commercial trucking claims, the Company may pay such increased premiums or increase its financial exposure on an aggregate or per occurrence basis, including by increasing the amount of its self-insured retention. However, to the extent the third party insurance companies propose reduced premiums for coverage of commercial trucking claims, the Company may reduce its financial exposure on an aggregate or per occurrence basis, including by decreasing the amount of its self-insured retention. In addition, no assurance can be given that insurance coverage from third party insurers for claims in excess of its current $5 million self-insured retention will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms.

Dependence on independent commission sales agents.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Agent Network,” the Company markets its services primarily

through independent commission sales agents. During 2012, 5042014, 525 agents generated revenue for Landstar of at least $1 million each (the “Million Dollar Agents”), or approximately 90%92% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Landstar competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of these independent commission sales agents. Landstar has historically experienced very limited agent turnover in the number of its Million Dollar Agents. There can be no assurances, however, that Landstar will continue to experience very limited turnover of its Million Dollar Agents in the future. Landstar’s contracts with its agents, including its Million Dollar Agents, are typically terminable without cause upon 10 to 30 days’ notice by either party and generally contain significant but not unqualified non-compete provisions limiting the ability of a former agent to compete with Landstar for a specified period of time post- termination, and other restrictive covenants. The loss of some of the Company’s Million Dollar Agents and/or a significant decrease in volumerevenue generated by other Million Dollar Agents could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

Dependence on third party capacity providers.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Transportation Capacity,” Landstar does not own trucks or other transportation equipment (other than trailing equipment) and relies on third party capacity providers, including BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers, to transport freight for its customers. The Company competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. The market for qualified truck owner-operators and other third party truck capacity providers is very competitive among motor carriers and no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to maintain or expand the number of BCO Independent Contractors or other third party truck capacity providers. Additionally, the Company’s third party capacity providers other than BCO Independent Contractors can be expected, under certain circumstances, to charge higher prices to cover increased operating expenses, such as any increases in the cost of fuel, and the Company’s operating income may decline without a corresponding increase in price to the customer. A significant decrease in available capacity provided by either the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors or other third party capacity providers, or increased rates charged by other third party capacity providers that cannot be passed through to the customers, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

Decreased demand for transportation services.    The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical financial results as a result of slowdowns in economic activity, the business cycles of customers, price increases by capacity providers and

other economic factors beyond Landstar’s control. The Company’s third party capacity providers other than BCO Independent Contractors can be expected to charge higher prices to cover increased operating expenses, such as any increases in the cost of fuel, and the Company’s operating income may decline without a corresponding increase in price to the customer. If a slowdown in economic activity or a downturn in the Company’s customers’ business cycles cause a reduction in the volume of freight shipped by those customers, the Company’s operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Substantial industry competition.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Competition,” Landstar competes primarily in the transportation and logistics services industry. This industry is extremely competitive and fragmented. Landstar competes primarily with truckload carriers, intermodal transportation service providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers, third party logistics companies and other non-asset basedasset-light transportation and logistics service providers. Management believes that competition for the freight transported by the Company is based on service, efficiency and freight rates, which are influenced significantly by the economic environment, particularly the amount of available transportation capacity and freight demand. Historically, competition has created downward pressure on freight rates. In addition, many large shippers are using third party logistics providers (“3PLs”) other than the Company to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs rather than directly arranging for transportation services with carriers. As noted above, there were 1110 transportation service providers, including 3PLs, included in the Company’s top 25 customers for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012.27, 2014. Usage by large shippers of 3PLs often provides carriers, such as the Company, with a less direct relationship with the shipper and, as a result, may increase pressure on freight rates while making it more difficult for the Company to compete primarily based on service and efficiency. A decrease in freight rates could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its revenue and operating income.

Status of independent contractors.    From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the status of independent contractors’ classification to

employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are classified as employees or independent contractors for employment tax purposes based on 20a multi-factor “common-law” factorsanalysis rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Internal Revenue Service regulations. In addition, under Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978, taxpayersa taxpayer that meetmeets certain criteria may treat an individual as an independent contractor for employment tax purposes if they havethe taxpayer has been audited without being told to treat similarly situated workers as employees, if they havethe taxpayer has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or a court decision affirming theirthe taxpayer’s treatment of the individual as an independent contractor, or if they arethe taxpayer is following a long-standing recognized practice.

The Company classifies its BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefits. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial, or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the employee/independent contractor classification of BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents doing business with the Company. Although management believes that there are no proposals currently pending that would significantly change the employee/independent contractor classification of BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents currently doing business with the Company, potential changes, if any, with respect to these BCO Independent Contractor and independent commission sales agent classifications could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s operating model. Moreover, the costs associated with any such potential changes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition if Landstar were unable to pass through to its customers an increase in price corresponding to such increased costs.

Regulatory and legislative changes.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Regulation,” certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are motor carriers and/or property brokers authorized to arrange for transportation services by motor carriers which are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and by various state agencies. Certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are licensed as ocean transportation intermediaries by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission as non-vessel-operating common carriers and/or as ocean freight

forwarders. The Company’s air transportation activities in the United States are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation as an indirect air carrier. One of the Company’s subsidiaries is licensed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) as a customs broker. The Company is also subject to regulations and requirements relating to safety and security promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through U.S. Customs and the Transportation Security Administration, the Canada Border Services Agency and various state and local agencies and port authorities. The transportation industry is subject to possible regulatory and legislative changes (such as increasingly stringent environmental, climate change and/or safety/security regulations or limits on vehicle weight and size) that may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or by changing the demand for common or contract carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services.

In December 2010,particular, the FMCSA initiated itsis consistently proposing regulatory changes that affect the operation of commercial motor carriers across the United States. The FMSCA has established the Compliance Safety Accountability (CSA) motor carrier oversight program (formerly Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010).program. The Company believes the intent of this program is to improve regulatory oversight of motor carriers and commercial drivers using a safety measurement system methodology that is fundamentally different from the methodology that the FMCSA hadhas historically relied upon. Under CSA, the FMCSA monitors seven Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories, or BASICs, under which a motor carrier may be evaluated. Since the introduction of CSA in December 2010, the FMCSA has considered and implemented changes to the methodologies used to determine carrier scores within a BASIC as well as to the BASICs, themselves. The FMCSA is attempting to implementhas also established threshold scores for each BASIC. In the event a motor carrier has one or more BASIC scores that exceeds the applicable threshold, the motor carrier has an increased risk of audit by FMSCA. BASIC scores in excess of applicable thresholds may also adversely affect a motor carrier’s overall safety rating and its relationships with shippers. The FMSCA has also recently implemented changes to the hours of service regulations which govern the work hours of commercial drivers and is consistently proposing regulatory changeshas a number of other proposals that affectit has announced are in process, including a rule which may mandate the operationuse of electronic logging devices in over-the-road commercial motor carriers across the United States.vehicles. It is difficult to predict which and in what form CSA or any other FMCSA regulations may be implemented, modified or enforced and what impact any such regulation may have on motor carrier operations or the aggregate number of trucks that provide hauling capacity to the Company.

In addition, recent focus on climate change and related environmental matters has led to efforts by federal, state and local governmental agencies to support legislation and regulations to limit the amount of carbon emissions, including emissions created by diesel engines utilized in tractors operated by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors

and Truck Brokerage Carriers. Moreover, federal, state and statelocal governmental agencies such as efforts by the California Air Resources Board, may also focus on regulation in relation to trailing equipment specifications in an effort to achieve, among other things, lower carbon emissions. IncreasedFor example, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) has implemented regulations that restrict the ability of certain tractors and trailers from operating in California. The Company currently is in a multi-year process of replacing its entire fleet of van trailing equipment to remain CARB-compliant. Further, CARB has established regulations that impose emission standards on nearly all diesel-fueled trucks with gross vehicle weight ratings in excess of 14,000 lbs. that operate in California. No assurances can be given with respect to the extent BCO Independent Contractors will choose to become CARB-compliant by purchasing a new or used CARB-compliant tractor, replacing the engine in their existing tractor with a CARB-compliant engine or performing an exhaust retrofit of their existing tractor by installing a particulate matter filter. Accordingly, many of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors may choose not to haul loads that would require travel within California, which could affect the ability of the Company to service customer freight needs for freight originating from, delivering to or traveling through California. Moreover, increased regulation on tractor or trailing equipment specifications, including emissions created by diesel engines, could create substantial costs on the Company and the Company’s third party capacity providers and, in turn, increase the cost of purchased transportation to the Company. An increase in the costs to purchase, lease or maintain tractor or trailing equipment or in purchased transportation cost caused by new regulations without a corresponding increase in price to the customer could have a material adverse effect onadversely affect Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition.

Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems.    As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Technology,” the Company’s information technology systems used in connection with its operations are located in Jacksonville, Florida and to a lesser extent in Rockford, Illinois and Southfield, Michigan.Illinois. In addition, the Company utilizes several third party data centers throughout the U.S. Landstar relies in the regular course of its business on the proper operation of its information technology systems to link its extensive network of customers, agents and third party capacity providers, including its BCO Independent Contractors. Although the Company has redundant systems for its critical operations, any significant disruption or failure of its technology systems or those of third party data centers on which it relies could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.

Dependence on key vendors.    As described above under “Dependence on third party insurance companies” and “Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems,” the Company is dependent on certain vendors, including third party insurance companies, third party data center providers, third party information technology application providers and third party payment systemdisbursement providers. Any inability to negotiate satisfactory terms with one of these key vendors or any other significant disruption to or termination of a relationship with one of these key vendors could disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.

Potential changes in fuel taxes.    From time to time, various legislative proposals are introduced to increase federal, state, or local taxes, including taxes on motor fuels. The Company cannot predict whether, or in what form, any increase in such taxes applicable to the transportation services provided by the Company will be enacted and, if enacted, whether or not the Company’s Truck Brokerage Carriers would attempt to pass the increase on to the Company or if the Company will be able to reflect this potential increased cost of capacity, if any, in prices to customers. Any such increase in fuel taxes, without a corresponding increase in price to the customer, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, competition from other transportation service companies including those that provide non-trucking modes of transportation and intermodal transportation would likely increase if state or federal taxes on fuel were to increase without a corresponding increase in taxes imposed upon other modes of transportation.

Catastrophic loss of a Company facility.    facility.    The Company faces the risk of a catastrophic loss of the use of all or a portion of its facilities located in Jacksonville, Florida and Rockford, Illinois and Southfield, Michigan due to hurricanes, flooding, tornados, other weather conditions, natural disasters, terrorist attacks or otherwise. The Company’s corporate headquarters and approximately two-thirds of the Company’s employees are located in its Jacksonville, Florida facility. In particular, a significant hurricane or similar catastrophic event that impacts the Jacksonville, Florida metropolitan area could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.

Although the Company maintains insurance covering its facilities, including business interruption insurance, the Company’s insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses that may be incurred in the event of a catastrophic loss of one of the Company’s facilities. In addition, such insurance, including business interruption insurance, could in the future become more expensive and difficult to maintain and may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Acquired businesses.    In the Company’s 2009 fiscal third quarter, the Company completed the acquisitions of (i) National Logistics Management Co., together with a limited liability company and certain corporate subsidiaries and affiliates, now collectively known as LSCS and (ii) A3 Integration, LLC, now known as LSCSLLC. These two acquisitions are referred to herein collectively as the “2009 Acquisitions.” LSCS’s business is heavily dependent on the automotive industry which has been very volatile in the past few years. As of the time of its acquisition by the Company, LSCSLLC was a startup company with no customers under contract. LSCSLLC licenses its principal software technology from an unaffiliated third party. The Company’s strategic initiatives of the 2009 Acquisitions are to increase freight transportation opportunities of the Company by identifying and engaging agents and customers to utilize LSCSLLC’s supply chain solutions technology. The Company makes no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully achieve its strategic initiatives as it relates to the 2009 Acquisitions. The two acquired entities are considered one reporting unit as it relates to business valuation. As it relates to goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of these companies in July 2009, should the automotive industry experience a significant downturn and should the Company fail to add customers to the technology platform acquired with the start-up company, the Company could determine that its goodwill is impaired in the future. The Company will continue to monitor the economic environment and test for impairment of goodwill as necessary.

Intellectual property.    The Company uses both internally developed and purchased technology in conducting its business. Whether internally developed or purchased, it is possible that the use of these technologies could be claimed to infringe upon or violate the intellectual property rights of third parties. In the event that a claim is made against the Company by a third party for the infringement of intellectual property rights, any settlement or adverse judgment against the Company either in the form of increased costs of licensing or a cease and desist order in using the technology could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and its results of operations.

Doing business with the federal government.Unclaimed property.    The Company must comply withis subject to federal and is affected bystate laws and regulations relating to doing business with the federal government. In addition, U.S. government agencies, including various agency Inspectors General,abandoned and unclaimed property. States routinely audit the records of companies to assess compliance with such laws. The

Company is currently undergoing a multi-state unclaimed property audit, the timing and investigate government contractors like the Company. Government contractorsoutcome of which cannot be predicted. The Company may also be subject to investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice as a result of orincur significant professional fees in connection with allegations made by third parties. In connectionthe audit. If the Company is found to be in noncompliance with an audit or investigation by a U.S. government agencyapplicable unclaimed property laws or the U.S. Department of Justice,manner in which such laws are interpreted or applied, states may determine that they are entitled to the Government may allege violations of specific laws and regulationsremittance by the Company of significant amounts of unclaimed or those doing business with the Company. The Governmentabandoned property and further may also seek remedies againstto impose other significant costs on the Company, such as finesincluding penalties and penalties, the termination of our contracts, or suspension or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. Government, any of which could cause the Company to suffer serious reputational harm and other adverse consequences.interest.

None.

The Company owns or leases various properties in the U.S. for the Company’s operations and administrative staff that support its independent commission sales agents, BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. The transportation logistics segment’s primary facilities are located in Jacksonville, Florida and Rockford, Illinois and Southfield, Michigan.Illinois. In addition, the Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Jacksonville, Florida. The Jacksonville, Florida and Rockford, Illinois facilities are owned by the Company, and the Southfield, Michigan facility is leased.Company. Management believes that Landstar’s owned and leased properties are adequate for its current needs and that leased properties can be retained or replaced at an acceptable cost.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

As further described in periodic and current reports previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Defendants”) were defendants in a suit (the “Litigation”) brought in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “District Court”) by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. (“OOIDA”) and four former BCO Independent Contractors (the “Named Plaintiffs” and, with OOIDA, the “Plaintiffs”) on behalf of all independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company and its subsidiaries under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”). The initial complaint in the Litigation was filed on November 1, 2002. The Plaintiffs alleged that certain aspects of the Company’s motor carrier leases and related practices with its BCO Independent Contractors violated certain federal leasing regulations and sought injunctive relief, an unspecified amount of damages and attorneys’ fees. Following a second trial in August 2012 in which all claims against the Defendants were denied, the Litigation was settled in December 2012. Under the terms of the settlement, the Plaintiffs dismissed their remaining claims in the Litigation, each party agreed to bear its own costs and fees in the Litigation, the parties exchanged releases, and OOIDA made a contribution to the BCO Benevolence Fund, Inc., a non-profit corporation founded by the Company to provide financial assistance to BCO Independent Contractors in hardship situations.

Also as further described in periodic and current reports previously filed by the Company with the SEC, in June 2011, Landstar System, Inc. received a Civil Investigative Demand (the “CID”) from the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky (the “U.S. Attorney”) issued pursuant to a complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by a third party under the False Claims Act. The Company cooperated fully with the CID, which requested documents and answers to written interrogatories limited to freight hauled to or from Fort Campbell, Kentucky by certain subsidiaries of the Company and billed to the U.S. government. In November 2012, the Company was informed by the U.S. Attorney of the dismissal of the Complaint and the consent by the U.S. government to such dismissal. The Company believes this matter has been concluded.

On September 23, 2011, a jury sitting in a state court in Cobb County, Georgia, entered a damage award of approximately $40.2 million (such amount, plus pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest and a portion of plaintiffs’ attorney fees in an amount not yet determined are collectively referred to herein as the “Damage Award”) against Landstar Ranger, Inc., Landstar System Holdings, Inc. and Landstar System, Inc. While a judgment has been entered by the court on the verdict, execution on that judgment is stayed and no judgment has been entered on the pre-judgment interest claims and attorney fee claims due to the pendency of certain post-trial motions. The Damage Award arises out of an accident that occurred in February 2007 involving a BCO Independent Contractor leased to Landstar Ranger, Inc. Under the terms of the commercial trucking insurance program that Landstar had in place in 2007, Landstar retained liability for up to $5 million with respect to the accident giving rise to the Damage Award. Landstar has third party insurance and/or reinsurance policies in place that are expected to provide coverage for all amounts of the Damage Award in excess of such retention, including all related out-of-pocket expenses, such as the costs of an appeal bond, interest and attorney fees comprising the Damage Award that may be entered by the trial court or an appellate court in the future. The Company recorded a $5 million charge representing its self-insured retention in respect of this accident in the consolidated financial results of the Company in the 2007 first quarter. Accordingly, that portion of the Damage Award has been previously recorded by the Company and therefore did not reduce consolidated operating income or net income for the Company’s 2011 or 2012 fiscal years. Under the terms of the Company’s insurance policies, the Company is the primary obligor of the amount of the Damage Award, and as such, the Company has reported a $38.7 million receivable from the third party insurance providers in other receivables and a corresponding liability of the same amount in insurance claims in the consolidated balance sheets at December 29, 2012. The Company and its insurers have filed post-trial motions challenging the Damage Award and seeking a new trial and intend to appeal the Damage Award to the extent necessary following the resolution of those motions. No assurances can be given regarding the outcome of the pending motions or any such appeal, including as to the impact of the Damage Award on the premiums charged by the Company’s third party insurers from time to time for commercial trucking insurance.

The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation including those described herein, arising from the normal conduct of business. Many of these claims are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Based on knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, opinions of outside counsel, management believes that adequate provisions have been made for probable losses with respect to the resolution of all such claims and pending litigation and that the ultimate outcome, after provisions therefor, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, but could have a material effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or year.

Not applicable.

PART II

The Common Stock of the Company is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “LSTR.” The following table sets forth the high and low reported sale prices for the Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the per share value of dividends declared for the periods indicated.

The reported last sale price per share of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on January 25, 201323, 2015 was $59.32$66.23 per share. As of such date, Landstar had 46,494,11444,794,486 shares of Common Stock outstanding. As of January 25, 2013, the Companyoutstanding and had 6071 stockholders of record of its Common Stock. However, the Company estimates that it has a significantly greater number of stockholders because a substantial number of the Company’s shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s purchasesCompany did not purchase any shares of its Common Stock during the period from September 30, 201228, 2014 to December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter:

quarter. On August 16, 2011,December 11, 2013, Landstar System, Inc. announced that it had been authorized by its Board of Directors to purchase up to 1,000,000increase the number of shares of itsthe Company’s Common Stock that the Company is authorized to purchase from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. During its 2012 fourth quarter, the Company completed thetransactions under a previously announced purchase of the balance of the shares authorized for purchase under this program. On July 25, 2012, Landstar System, Inc. announced that it had been authorized by its Board of Directorsprogram to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions.3,000,000 shares. As of December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company has authorization to purchase 1,991,8771,827,782 shares of its Common Stock under this program. No specific expiration date has been assigned to the July 25, 2012December 11, 2013 authorization.

Dividends

During 2012,2014, Landstar paid dividends as follows:

The Company did not pay cash dividends during fiscal year 2013. Dividends payable of $0.35 per share, or of $15,921,000 in the aggregate, was included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2013. On December 5, 2012,4, 2014, the Company announced that it expectsits Board of Directors declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share payable on January 26, 2015, to stockholders of record of its Common Stock

as of January 12, 2015. Dividends payable of $44,794,000 in the aggregate related to this special dividend declaredare included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 27, 2014. On January 29, 2015, the Company announced the declaration of a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share payable on December 4, 2012March 13, 2015, to be in lieustockholders of anyrecord on February 16, 2015. It is currently the intention of the Board of Directors to pay a quarterly dividends it may otherwise have declared and paid in connection with its quarterly earnings results for the four quarters of fiscal 2013 and for the first three quarters of fiscal 2014.dividend going forward.

On June 29, 2012, Landstar entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a restriction on cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders on the Company’s capital stock in the event there is a default under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement, under certain circumstances, limits the amount of such cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders to the extent that, after giving effect to any payment made to effect such cash dividend or other distribution, the Leverage Ratio, (asas defined in the Credit Agreement)Agreement, would exceed 2.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis as of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company maintains onetwo stock compensation planplans for members of its Board of Directors and two employee equity incentive plans. The following table presents information related to securities authorized for issuance under these plans at December 29, 2012:27, 2014:

Under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 EIP”), the issuance of (i) a non-vested share of Landstar Common Stock issued in the form of restricted stock and (ii) a share of Landstar Common Stock issued upon the vesting of a previously granted restricted stock unit each counts as the issuance of two securities against the number of securities available for future issuance. Included in the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans were 114,80895,531 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 20032013 Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan.

Financial Model Shareholder Returns

The following graph illustrates the return that would have been realized, assuming reinvestment of dividends, by an investor who invested $100 in each of the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Transportation Stock Index for the period commencing December 29, 200726, 2009 through December 29, 2012.27, 2014.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Balance Sheet Data:		Dec. 27, 2014				Dec. 28, 2013				Dec. 29, 2012				Dec. 31, 2011				Dec. 25, 2010
Total assets		$	1,044,212			$	970,696			$	879,421			$	808,449			$	683,882
Long-term debt, including current maturities			111,321				101,505				114,141				132,342				121,611
Shareholders’ equity			488,261				454,481				379,454				300,577				250,967

The information above for fiscal years 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 has been adjusted for the completion of the sale of Landstar Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., including its wholly owned subsidiary, Landstar Supply Chain Solutions LLC (collectively, “LSCS”), to XPO Logistics, Inc. and the treatment of LSCS as a discontinued operation effective December 28, 2013.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following is a “safe harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements contained in this document that are not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which relate to Landstar’s business objectives, plans, strategies and expectations. Terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intention,” “expects,” “plans,” “predicts,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” the negative thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are by nature subject to uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to: an increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or other claims; unfavorable development

of existing accident claims; dependence on third party insurance companies; dependence on independent commission sales agents; dependence on third party capacity providers; decreased demand for transportation services; substantial industry competition; disruptions or failures in ourthe Company’s computer systems; dependence on key vendors; changes in fuel taxes; status of independent contractors; regulatory and legislative changes; catastrophic loss of a Company facility; acquired businesses; intellectual property; unclaimed property; and other operational, financial or legal risks or uncertainties detailed in this and Landstar’s other SEC filings from time to time and described in Item 1A of this Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results or events to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Introduction

Landstar System, Inc. and its subsidiary, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. (together, referred to herein as “Landstar” or the “Company”), is a non-asset basedan asset-light provider of freightintegrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions. The Company offers services to its customers across multiple transportation modes, with the ability to arrange for individual shipments of freight to enterprise-wide solutions to manage all of a customer’s transportation and logistics needs. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada, and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and other countries around the world. The Company’s services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of independent commission sales agents and third party capacity providers linked together by a series of technological applications which are provided and coordinated by the Company. Landstar markets its freight transportation services and supply chain solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport and store customers’ freight. The nature of the Company’s business is such that a significant portion of its operating costs varies directly with revenue.

Landstar markets its freightintegrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents whoand exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease

arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under non-exclusive contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers railroads and independent warehouse capacity providers (“Warehouse Capacity Owners”).railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s information technology systems, Landstar operates aan integrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $2.8$3.2 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.

The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload and less-than-truckload transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited ground and air delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, project cargo and customs brokerage. Supply chain solutions are based on advanced technology solutions utilizing intellectual property that may be owned by the Company or licensed from third parties. Such solutions as offered by the Company may include integrated multi-modal solutions, outsourced logistics, supply chain engineering and warehousing. Industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive products, lumber and building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics, ammunition and explosives and military equipment. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including logistics and less-than-truckload service providers. Each of the independent commission sales agents has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment. FreightBillings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the

physical transportation of freight. Supply chain solutions customersfreight and are generally charged fees for the services provided. Revenue recognized by the transportation logistics segment when providing capacity to customers to haul their freight is referred to herein as “transportation services revenue” and revenue for freight management services recognized on a fee-for-service basis is referred to herein as “transportation management fees.”transportation revenue. During 2012, transportation services2014, revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and railroads represented 50%approximately 48%, 43%,46% and 3%, respectively, of the Company’s transportation logistics segmentconsolidated revenue. Collectively, transportation services revenue hauled by air and ocean cargo carriers represented 3%approximately 2% of the Company’s transportation logistics segmentconsolidated revenue during 2012. Transportation management fees represented 1% of the Company’s transportation logistics segment revenue in 2012.2014.

The insurance segment is comprised of Signature Insurance Company, a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary (“Signature”), and Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. This segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance directly to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk is ultimately borne by the Company.Signature. Revenue at the insurance segment represented approximately 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for 2012.2014.

On December 28, 2013, the Company completed the sale of Landstar Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, including its wholly owned subsidiary, Landstar Supply Chain Solutions LLC (collectively, “LSCS”), to XPO Logistics, Inc. LSCS was previously reported as a unit of the transportation logistics segment. The gain on the sale of LSCS and the operating results of LSCS for the fiscal year 2013 and prior periods have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to discontinued operations.

Changes in Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management believes the Company’s success principally depends on its ability to generate freight through its network of independent commission sales agents and to safely and efficiently deliver that freight utilizing third party capacity providers. Management believes the most significant factors to the Company’s success include increasing revenue, sourcing capacity and controlling costs, including insurance and claims.

While customer demand, which is subject to overall economic conditions, ultimately drives increases or decreases in revenue, the Company primarily relies on its independent commission sales agents to establish customer relationships and generate revenue opportunities. Management’s emphasis with respect to revenue growth is on revenue generated by independent commission sales agents who on an annual basis generate $1 million or more of Landstar revenue (“Million Dollar Agents”). Management believes future revenue growth is primarily dependent on its ability to increase both the revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents and the number of Million Dollar Agents through a combination of recruiting new agents and increasing the revenue

opportunities generated by existing independent commission sales agents. The following table shows the number of Million Dollar Agents, the average revenue generated by these agents and the percent of consolidated revenue generated by these agents during the past three fiscal years:

The change in the number of Million Dollar Agents on a year-over-year basis is influenced by many factors and is not solely the result of terminations of contractual relationships between agents and the Company, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Such other factors include consolidations among agencies or retirement or similar transition actions. The change in the number of Million Dollar Agents on a year-over-year basis may also be affected by agents that remain with the Company yet experienced lower year-over-year revenue that resulted in such agent moving below the Million Dollar Agent category. In general, the number of agents in the million dollar category who terminate in a given year has been 3% or less of the total number of Million Dollar Agents. In addition, revenue from accounts formerly handled by terminated Million Dollar Agents is often retained by the Company as the customer may choose to transfer its account to an existing Landstar agent.

Management monitors business activity by tracking the number of loads (volume) and revenue per load by mode of transportation. Revenue per load can be influenced by many factors other than a change in price. Those factors include the average length of haul, freight type, special handling and equipment requirements, fuel costs and delivery time requirements. For shipments involving two or more modes of transportation, revenue is

generally classified by the mode of transportation having the highest cost for the load. The following table summarizes this information by trailer type for truck transportation and by mode of transportationfor all others for the past three fiscal years:

Also critical to the Company’s success is its ability to secure capacity, particularly truck capacity, at rates that allow the Company to profitably transport customers’ freight. The following table summarizes available truck capacity providers as of the end of the three most recent fiscal years:

The Company incurs costs that are directly related to the transportation of freight that include purchased transportation and commissions to agents. The Company incurs indirect costs associated with the transportation of freight that include other operating costs and insurance and claims. In addition, the Company incurs selling, general and administrative costs essential to administering its business operations. Management continually monitors all components of the costs incurred by the Company and establishes annual cost budgets which, in general, are used to benchmark costs incurred on a monthly basis.

Purchased transportation represents the amount a BCO Independent Contractor or other third party capacity provider is paid to haul freight. The amount of purchased transportation paid to a BCO Independent Contractor is primarily based on a contractually agreed-upon percentage of revenue generated by delivered loads the haul.BCO Independent Contractor hauled. Purchased transportation paid to a Truck Brokerage Carrier is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or, to a lesser extent, a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Purchased transportation paid to railroads is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate. Purchased transportation paid to railroads, air cargo carriers oris generally based on a

negotiated rate for each load hauled and purchased transportation paid to ocean cargo carriers is generally based on contractually agreed-upon fixed rates. Purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue for truck brokerage, rail intermodal and ocean cargo services is normally higher than that of BCO Independent Contractor and air cargo services. Purchased transportation is the largest component of costs and expenses and, on a consolidated basis, increases or decreases as a percentage of consolidated revenue in proportion to changes in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated through BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers transportation management fees and revenue from the insurance segment.reinsurance premiums. Purchased transportation as a percent of revenue also increases or decreases in relation to the availability of truck brokerage capacity and with changes in the price of fuel on revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers. Purchased transportation costs are recognized upon the completion of freight delivery.

Commissions to agents are based on contractually agreed-upon percentages of revenue or net revenue, defined as revenue less the cost of purchased transportation, or net revenue less a contractually agreed upon percentage of revenue retained by Landstar. Commissions to agents as a percentage of consolidated revenue will vary directly with fluctuations in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by the various modes of transportation transportation management fees and revenue from the insurance segmentreinsurance premiums and with changes in net revenue margin, defined as net revenue divided by revenue, on services provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads, air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers. Commissions to agents are recognized upon the completion of freight delivery.

The Company defines gross profit as revenue less the cost of purchased transportation and commissions to agents. Gross profit divided by revenue is referred to as gross profit margin. The Company’s operating margin is defined as operating income divided by gross profit.

In general, gross profit margin on revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors represents a fixed percentage of revenue due to the nature of the contracts that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to both the BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents. For revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers, gross profit margin is either fixed or variable as a percent of revenue, depending on the contract with each individual independent commission sales agent. Under certain contracts with independent commission sales agents, the Company retains a fixed percentage of revenue and the agent retains the amount remaining less the cost of purchased transportation (the “retention contracts”). Gross profit margin on revenue hauled by railroads, air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and Truck Brokerage Carriers, other than those under retention contracts, is variable in nature as the Company’s contracts with independent commission sales agents provide commissions to agents at a contractually agreed upon percentage of net revenue for these types of loads. Approximately 61%56% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in 2012 had2014 was generated under contracts that have a fixed gross profit margin while 44% was under contracts that have a variable gross profit margin.

Maintenance costs for Company-provided trailing equipment and BCO Independent Contractor recruiting costs are the largest components of other operating costs. Also included in other operating costs are the provision for uncollectible advances and other receivables due from BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents and gains/losses, if any, on sales of Company-owned trailing equipment.

PotentialWith respect to insurance and claims cost, potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. For commercial trucking claims, Landstar retains liability up to $5,000,000 per occurrence. The Company also retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $1,000,000, $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

EmployeeDuring the 2014 fiscal year, employee compensation and benefits accountaccounted for over sixtyseventy percent of the Company’s selling, general and administrative costs.

Depreciation and amortization primarily relate to depreciation of trailing equipment amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of information technology hardware and software.

The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of purchased transportation and commissions to agents, both being direct costs, to revenue and indirect costs as a percentage of gross profit for the periods indicated:

Management believes that a discussion of indirect costs as a percentage of gross profit is useful and meaningful to potential investors for the following principal reasons: (1) disclosure of these relative measures (i.e., each indirect operating cost line item as a percentage of gross profit) allows investors to better understand the underlying trends in Landstar’s results of operations; (2) due to the generally fixed nature of these indirect costs (other than insurance and claims costs), these relative measures are meaningful to investors’ evaluations of the Company’s management of its indirect costs attributable to operations; (3) management considers this financial information in its decision-making, such as budgeting for infrastructure, trailing equipment and selling, general and administrative costs; and (4) this information facilitates comparisons by investors of Landstar’s results to the results of other non-asset or asset-light companies in the transportation and logistics services industry who report “net revenue” in Management Discussion and Analysis, which represents revenue less the cost of purchased transportation. The difference between Landstar’s use of the term “gross profit” and the use of the term “net revenue” by other companies in the transportation and logistics services industry is due to the direct cost of commissions to agents under the Landstar business model, whereas other companies in this industry generally have no commissions to agents.

Also, as previously mentioned, the Company reports two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment. External revenue at the insurance segment, representing reinsurance premiums, has historically been relatively consistent on a year-over-year basis at less than 2% of consolidated revenue and generally corresponds directly with the number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors. The discussion of indirect cost line items in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations considers the Company’s costs on a consolidated basis rather than on a segment basis. Management believes this presentation format is the most appropriate to assist users of the financial statements in understanding the Company’s business for the following reasons: (1) the insurance segment has no other operating costs; (2) discussion of insurance and claims at either segment without reference to the other may

create confusion amongst investors and potential investors due to intercompany arrangements and specific deductible programs that affect comparability of financial results by segment between various fiscal periods but that have no effect on the Company from a consolidated reporting perspective; (3) selling, general and administrative costs of the insurance segment comprise less than 10% of consolidated selling, general and administrative costs and have historically been relatively consistent on a year-over-year basis; and (4) the insurance segment has no depreciation and amortization.

Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 201227, 2014 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 201128, 2013

Revenue for fiscal year 20122014 was $2,793,420,000,$3,184,790,000, an increase of $144,338,000,$520,010,000, or 5%20%, compared to fiscal year 2011. Revenue2013. Transportation revenue increased $142,820,000,$517,188,000, or 5%, at the transportation logistics segment.20%. The increase in revenue at the transportation logistics segmentrevenue was primarily attributable to a 4%approximately an 8% increase in the number of loads hauled and an increased revenue per load of approximately 1%10%. Included in fiscal years 2012 and 2011 was $22,381,000 and $20,516,000, respectively, of transportation management fee revenue. Revenue at the insurance segment, representing reinsuranceReinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk of loss is ultimately borne by the Company, was $35,861,000Signature, were $39,377,000 and $34,343,000$36,555,000 for fiscal years 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively. The increase in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to the net increase in the number of BCO Independent Contractors in 2014.

Truck transportation revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers (together, the “third party truck capacity providers”) for fiscal year 2012,2014, was $2,582,922,000,$2,988,578,000, or 92%94% of total revenue, an increase of $155,653,000,$520,075,000, or 6%21%, compared to fiscal year 2011.2013. The number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers in fiscal year 20122014 increased approximately 9% compared to fiscal year 2013, and revenue per load increased approximately 12% compared to fiscal year 2013. The increase in the number of loads hauled via third party truck capacity providers compared to fiscal year 2013 was due to a broad-based increase in underlying demand for truck transportation services and increased market share from new agents. The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was primarily attributable to increased demand and a tight truck capacity environment. The increase in the number of loads hauled by van equipment of 11% and the increase in the number of loads hauled by unsided/platform equipment of 6% compared to fiscal year 2013 were primarily due to a broad based increase in demand for transportation services in the domestic marketplace and increased market share from new agents. The increase in revenue per load for loads hauled by van equipment of 12% and the increase in revenue per load hauled by unsided/platform equipment of 11% compared to fiscal year 2013 was due to increased demand and tightened capacity. The decrease in the number of LTL loads of 5% compared to fiscal year 2011,2013 was primarily due to the loss of one specific customer. The increase in LTL revenue per load of 18% compared to fiscal year 2013 was primarily due to the loss of one specific customer. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $121,656,000 and $110,722,000 in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue.

Transportation revenue hauled by rail intermodal, air cargo and ocean cargo carriers (collectively, the “multimode capacity providers”) for fiscal year 2014, was $156,172,000, or 5% of total revenue, a decrease of $3,329,000, or 2%, compared to fiscal year 2013. The number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers in fiscal year 2014 increased approximately 4% compared to fiscal year 2013, while revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 6% over the same period. The increase in loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily due to increased rail intermodal loads. The decrease in revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily due to decreased project cargo loads hauled by ocean cargo carriers, which typically have a higher revenue per load amount compared to other types of multimode shipments. Also, revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity.

Purchased transportation was 77.3% and 76.8% of revenue in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to an increased rate of

purchased transportation paid to Truck Brokerage Carriers as the availability of truck capacity tightened in fiscal year 2014, and an increase in the percentage of revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers, which typically has a higher rate of purchased transportation than revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors. Commissions to agents were 7.9% of revenue in both fiscal years 2014 and 2013.

Investment income was $1,381,000 and $1,475,000 in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in investment income was primarily due to lower average rates of return on investments held by the Company during fiscal year 2014.

Other operating costs increased $4,203,000 in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 and represented 5.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 2014 compared to 5.3% in fiscal year 2013. The increase in other operating costs compared to the prior year was primarily due to increased trailing equipment costs, an increased provision for contractor bad debt and lower gains on sales of used trailing equipment. The increase in other operating costs as a percent of gross profit was caused by the increase in operating costs, partially offset by the effect of increased gross profit in fiscal year 2014.

Insurance and claims decreased $4,158,000 in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 and represented 9.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2014 compared to 12.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 2013. The decrease in insurance and claims compared to prior year was due to net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates of $6,664,000 in fiscal year 2014 compared to $10,909,000 in fiscal year 2013. The decrease in insurance and claims as a percentage of gross profit was also due to the effect of increased gross profit in fiscal year 2014.

Selling, general and administrative costs increased $18,540,000 in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 and represented 31.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2014 compared to 32.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 2013. The increase in selling, general and administrative costs compared to prior year was due to a $17,793,000 provision for incentive compensation in fiscal year 2014 compared to a $6,145,000 provision in fiscal year 2013, increased stock-based compensation expense and an increased provision for customer bad debt in fiscal year 2014. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of gross profit, however, was primarily due to the effect of increased gross profit in fiscal year 2014, which more than offset the effect of the increase in selling, general and administrative costs.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $92,000 in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 and represented 5.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2014 compared to 6.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2013. The decrease in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of gross profit was primarily due to the effect of increased gross profit in fiscal year 2014.

Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 2014 was $34,000 lower than fiscal year 2013.

The provisions for income taxes for both fiscal years 2014 and 2013 were based on estimated effective income tax rates of approximately 38.2%, adjusted for discrete events, such as benefits resulting from disqualifying dispositions of the Company’s Common Stock by employees who obtained the stock through exercises of incentive stock options. The effective income tax rate on income from continuing operations for both fiscal years 2014 and 2013 was 37.2%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily as a result of state taxes, the meals and entertainment exclusion and non-deductible stock-based compensation, partially offset by recognition of benefits related to certain tax matters.

Net income was $138,809,000, or $3.09 per common share ($3.07 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2014. Income from continuing operations was $108,922,000, or $2.37 per common share ($2.36 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2013. Net income was $146,009,000, or $3.17 per common share ($3.16 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2013.

Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2013 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012

Revenue for fiscal year 2013 was $2,664,780,000, a decrease of $106,019,000, or 4%, compared to fiscal year 2012. Transportation revenue decreased $106,713,000, or 4%. The decrease in transportation revenue was primarily attributable to a 2% decrease in each of the number of loads hauled and revenue per load. Reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk of loss is ultimately borne by Signature, were $36,555,000 and $35,861,000 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Truck transportation revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers for fiscal year 2013, was $2,468,503,000, or 93% of total revenue, a decrease of $114,419,000, or 4%, compared to fiscal year 2012. The number of loads hauled and revenue per load increasedfrom loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers in fiscal year 2013 each decreased approximately 2% compared to fiscal year 2011.2012. The increasedecrease in the number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers compared to fiscal 2012 was primarily attributabledue to increased loads hauled ongeneral softness in demand for transportation services provided via unsided/platform trailing equipment and, loads generated from the addition of new independent commission sales agents.to a lesser extent, transportation services provided via van equipment. The increasedecrease in revenue per load on revenue hauled by third party truck capacity providers was primarily attributabledue to both an increasea decrease in the number of loads hauled on unsided/platform equipment, which typically has a higher revenue per load, and a slight increasedecrease in the revenue per load billed on loads hauled on unsided/platform equipment. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $114,426,000$110,722,000 and $101,114,000$114,426,000 in fiscal years 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue.

Transportation revenue hauled by rail intermodal, air cargo and ocean cargo carriers (collectively, the “multimode capacity providers”) for fiscal year 2012,2013, was $151,830,000,$159,501,000, or 5%6% of total revenue, a decreasean increase of $14,573,000,$7,671,000, or 9%5%, compared to fiscal year 2011.2012. The number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers in fiscal year 2012 decreased 5%2013 increased approximately 2% compared to fiscal year 2011,2012, and revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers decreasedincreased approximately 3% over the same period. The decrease in the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily attributable to decreased chartered air loads resulting partly from the termination of one independent commission sales agent in fiscal year 2012 plus lower demand for international air freight services. Revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the modevarious modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity.

Purchased transportation was 76.2%76.8% and 75.8%76.9% of revenue in fiscal years 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. The increasedecrease in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in the percentage of revenue hauledcontributed by Truck Brokerage Carriers,the insurance segment, which has a higher rate of purchasedno transportation and increased rates of purchased transportation paid to Truck Brokerage Carriers.costs. Commissions to agents were 7.8% and 7.9% of revenue in both fiscal years 20122013 and 2011, respectively. The decrease in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to a decreased net revenue margin, defined as net revenue divided by revenue, on revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers.2012.

Investment income at the insurance segment was $1,563,000$1,475,000 and $1,705,000$1,563,000 in fiscal years 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively. The decrease in investment income was primarily due to a lower average raterates of return on investments held by the insurance segmentCompany during fiscal year 2012.2013.

Other operating costs were 5.1%decreased $1,014,000 in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 and 6.7%represented 5.3% of gross profit in both fiscal years 20122013 and 2011, respectively.2012. The decrease in other operating costs as a percentage of gross profitcompared to prior year was primarily attributabledue to the effect of increased gross profit, increased gains on sales ofdecreased trailing equipment a decreasedmaintenance costs, partially offset by an increased provision for contractor bad debt and decreased trailing equipment maintenance costs. debt.

Insurance and claims were 8.4%costs increased $13,149,000 in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 and represented 12.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 2012 and 9.9%2013 compared to 8.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011.2012. The decreaseincrease in insurance and claims costs compared to prior year was due to net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates of $10,909,000, which primarily related to three claims, in fiscal year 2013 compared to $11,000 of net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in fiscal year 2012. The increase in insurance and claims as a percentage of gross profit compared to prior year was primarily due to an increase in the percentincreased net unfavorable development of gross profit contributed from revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriersprior years’ claims estimates in fiscal year 2012, which has a lower liability exposure2013 compared to the Company, and a decrease in the severity of commercial trucking claims duringfiscal year 2012.

Selling, general and administrative costs were 34.5%decreased $6,384,000 in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 and represented 32.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 20122013 and 35.4%32.7% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011.2012. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs was primarily attributable to a decreased provision for bonuses under the Company’s incentive compensation plan, a decrease in the provision for customer bad debt, and decreased stock-based compensation expense. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of gross profit was primarily attributable tocaused by the decrease in selling, general and administrative costs, partially offset by the effect of increaseddecreased gross profit a decreased provision for bonuses under the Company’s incentive compensation plan and decreased legal fees. in fiscal year 2013.

Depreciation and amortization was 6.2%increased $2,454,000 in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 and represented 6.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 20122013 and 6.0% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011.2012. The increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to depreciation on new trailing equipment that replaced older, fully depreciated trailing equipment in fiscal year 2013. The increase in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of gross profit was primarilyalso due to additionsthe effect of decreased gross profit in fiscal year 2013.

Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 2013 was $101,000 higher than fiscal year 2012. The increase in interest and debt expense was primarily attributable to higher average capital lease obligations related to financing the purchase of trailing equipment that replaced older, fully depreciated trailing equipment in fiscal year 2012.during 2013, partially offset by decreased average borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facility.

The provisions for income taxes for both fiscal years 20122013 and 20112012 were based on estimated full year combined effective income tax rates of approximately38.2%, adjusted for discrete events, such as benefits resulting from disqualifying dispositions of the Company’s Common Stock by employees who obtained the stock through exercises of incentive stock options and benefits relating to uncertain tax positions for which the applicable statute of limitations expired. The effective income tax rates on income from continuing operations for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were 37.2% and 36.0% and 37.3%, respectively, which were higher than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily as a result of state taxes, the meals and entertainment exclusion and non-deductible stockstock-based compensation, expense, partlypartially offset by recognition of benefits relatingrelated to several uncertaincertain tax positions in both years.matters. The year over prior year decreaseincrease in the effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012 was primarily due to increaseddecreased benefits relating to uncertain tax positions recognized in 2012 over 2011fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012.

Income from continuing operations was $108,922,000, or $2.37 per common share ($2.36 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2013. Income from continuing operations was $126,566,000, or $2.71 per common share ($2.70 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2012.

Income from discontinued operations of $37,087,000, or $0.81 per common share ($0.80 per diluted share) in fiscal year 2013 included a gain on sale of $33,029,000, or $0.72 per common share ($0.71 per diluted share), net of income taxes of $19,145,000, and income tax benefits resulting from disqualifying dispositionoperations of the Company’s Common Stock by employees who obtained the stock through exercises$4,058,000, or $0.09 per common share ($0.09 per diluted share), net of incentive stock options duringincome taxes of $2,615,000. Income from discontinued operations was $3,215,000, or $0.07 per common share ($0.07 per diluted share), net of income taxes of $1,905,000, in fiscal year 2012.

Net income attributable to the Companywas $146,009,000, or $3.17 per common share ($3.16 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2013. Net income was $129,781,000, or $2.78 per common share ($2.77 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2012. Net income attributable to the Company was $113,007,000, or $2.38 per common share ($2.38 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2011.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2010

Revenue for fiscal year 2011 was $2,649,082,000, an increase of $248,912,000, or 10%, compared to fiscal year 2010. Revenue increased $248,707,000, or 11%, at the transportation logistics segment. The increase in revenue at the transportation logistics segment was primarily attributable to a higher revenue per load of approximately 10% and a 1% increase in the number of loads hauled. Included in fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were transportation management fees of $20,516,000 and $17,652,000, respectively. Revenue, representing premiums on reinsurance programs provided to BCO Independent Contractors, at the insurance segment was $34,343,000 and $34,138,000 for fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Truck transportation revenue hauled by third-party truck capacity providers for fiscal year 2011, which represented 92% of total revenue, was $2,427,269,000, an increase of $218,269,000, or 10%, compared to fiscal year 2010. The number of loads hauled by third-party truck capacity providers in fiscal year 2011 increased 1% compared to fiscal year 2010, and revenue per load increased 9% compared to fiscal year 2010. The increase in the number of loads hauled by third-party truck capacity providers was primarily attributable to increased industrial production in the domestic marketplace as well as the impact of market share gains from agents recruited during 2011 and 2010, partially offset by the anticipated reduction of freight hauled on behalf of one customer in the Company’s less-than-truckload substitute line haul service offering. Less-than-truckload substitute line haul revenue was $74,823,000 and $219,872,000 in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in revenue per load on revenue hauled by third-party truck capacity providers was primarily attributable to tighter truck capacity in the domestic market during 2011. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $101,114,000 and $79,898,000 in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue hauled by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue.

Transportation revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers for fiscal year 2011, which represented 6% of total revenue, was $166,403,000, an increase of $29,936,000, or 22%, compared to fiscal year 2010. The number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers in fiscal year 2011 increased 7% compared to fiscal year 2010, and revenue per load increased 14% over the same period. The increase in revenue per load on revenue hauled by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors including the mode of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity.

Purchased transportation was 75.8% and 76.0% of revenue in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to reduced less-than-truckload substitute line-haul revenue, which has a higher rate of purchased transportation, partially offset by an increase in the percentage of revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers excluding less-than-truckload substitute line-haul revenue. Commissions to agents were 7.9% of revenue in fiscal year 2011 and 7.6% of revenue in fiscal year 2010. The increase in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to decreased less-than-truckload substitute line-haul revenue, which typically has a lower commission rate.

Investment income at the insurance segment was $1,705,000 and $1,558,000 in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in investment income was primarily due to an increased average rate of return on investments held by the insurance segment, partly offset by a lower average investment balance during fiscal year 2011.

Other operating costs were 6.7% and 7.3% of gross profit in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in other operating costs as a percentage of gross profit was primarily attributable to the effect of increased gross profit and a reduction in certain outsourced logistics services costs in fiscal year 2011. Insurance and claims were 9.9% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011 and 12.5% of gross profit in fiscal year 2010. The decrease in insurance and claims as a percentage of gross profit was primarily due to an increase in the percent of gross profit contributed from revenue hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers in fiscal year 2011, which has a lower

claims risk profile and favorable frequency and severity of accidents in fiscal year 2011. Selling, general and administrative costs were 35.4% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011 and 38.8% of gross profit in fiscal year 2010. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of gross profit was primarily attributable to the effect of increased gross profit and a decreased provision for bonuses under the Company’s incentive compensation plan, partially offset by an increase in the provision for customer bad debt in fiscal year 2011 with a significant portion related to one specific customer. In addition, selling, general and administrative costs included a one-time charge in fiscal year 2010 of $3,800,000 related to the buyout by the Company of its remaining contingent payment obligations relating to an acquisition completed in 2009. Depreciation and amortization was 6.0% of gross profit in fiscal year 2011 and 6.3% of gross profit in fiscal year 2010. The decrease in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of gross profit was primarily due to the effect of increased gross profit in fiscal year 2011.

Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 2011 was $511,000 lower than fiscal year 2010. The decrease in interest and debt expense was primarily attributable to lower average capital lease obligations and lower average borrowing rates on capital leases, partially offset by increased average borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facility during fiscal year 2011.

The provisions for income taxes for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were based on estimated full year combined effective income tax rates of approximately 37.3% and 36.5%, respectively, which were higher than the statutory federal income tax rate primarily as a result of state taxes, the meals and entertainment exclusion and non-deductible stock compensation expense, partly offset by recognition of benefits relating to several uncertain tax provisions in both years.

In the Company’s 2009 fiscal third quarter, the Company acquired A3 Integration, LLC, now known as LSCS LLC, and its subsidiaries through A3i Acquisition LLC, an entity in which the Company owned 100% of the non-voting, preferred interests and, from the date of acquisition to January 2011, 75% of the voting, common equity interests. The net losses attributable to noncontrolling interest of $62,000 and $932,000 in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively, represent the noncontrolling investor’s 25% share of the net loss incurred by A3i Acquisition through January 2011. The Company purchased the remaining 25% of A3i Acquisition in January 2011.

Net income attributable to the Company was $113,007,000, or $2.38 per common share ($2.38 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2011. Net income attributable to the Company was $87,514,000, or $1.77 per common share ($1.77 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2010.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Working capital and the ratio of current assets to current liabilities were $321,877,000 and 1.8 to 1, respectively, at December 27, 2014, compared with $306,808,000 and 1.8 to 1, respectively, at December 28, 2013, and $247,605,000 and 1.7 to 1, respectively, at December 29, 2012, compared with $220,679,000 and 1.7 to 1, respectively, at December 31, 2011 and $142,571,000 and 1.5 to 1, respectively, at December 25, 2010.2012. Landstar has historically operated with current ratios within the range of 1.5 to 1 to 2.0 to 1. Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $125,584,000, $118,034,000,$101,869,000, $152,645,000, and $108,758,000$120,331,000 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash flow provided by operating activities of continuing operations for 2014 compared to 2013 was

primarily attributable to the increase in trade receivables since the beginning of the fiscal year 2014 generally driven by the significant growth in revenue in 2014. The increase in cash flow provided by operating activities of continuing operations for 20122013 compared to 20112012 was primarily attributable to the timing of collections of trade receivables and increased net income, partially offset by timing of payments. The increase in cash flow provided by operating activities for 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily attributable to increased net income and the timing of payments, partially offset by timing of collections of trade receivables.

The Company declared and paid $0.73, $0.21, and $0.19$0.26 per share, or $33,981,000, $9,983,000 and $9,422,000$11,685,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during 2012, 2011,2014 and, 2010, respectively. Onduring such period, also paid $15,921,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2013 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 5, 2012,28, 2013. In addition, on December 4, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $0.50$1.00 per share, or $44,794,000 in the aggregate, payable on January 26, 2015, to holdersstockholders of record as of January 12, 2015. Dividends payable of $44,794,000 related to this special dividend was included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 27, 2014. The Company did not pay any cash dividends during 2013. The Company paid $0.73 per share, or $33,981,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during 2012. During 2014, the Company purchased 939,872 shares of its Common Stock asat a total cost of December 17, 2012. In conjunction with the announcement of this dividend, the Company announced that it does not expect the declaration and payment of dividends in connection with its quarterly earnings results for the four quarters of fiscal$56,393,000. During 2013 and for the first three quarters of fiscal 2014. During 2012, the Company purchased

1,116,673 and 524,674 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $25,826,000. During 2011$59,496,000 and 2010, the Company purchased 1,206,111 and 2,652,791 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $50,450,000 and $102,736,000,$25,826,000, respectively. The Company has used cash provided by operating activities and borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facilities to fund the purchases. Since January 1997, the Company has purchased approximately $1,051,000,000$1,167,000,000 of its Common Stock under programs authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company in open market and private block transactions. As of December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company may purchase up to an additional 1,991,8771,827,782 shares of its Common Stock under its authorized stock purchase program. Long-term debt, including current maturities, was $111,321,000 at December 27, 2014, compared to $101,505,000 at December 28, 2013 and $114,141,000 at December 29, 2012, compared to $132,342,000 at December 31, 2011 and $121,611,000 at December 25, 2010.2012.

EquityShareholders’ equity was $379,454,000,$488,261,000, or 77%81% of total capitalization (defined as long-term debt including current maturities plus equity), at December 29, 2012,27, 2014, compared to $300,577,000,$454,481,000, or 69%82% of total capitalization, at December 31, 201128, 2013 and $250,967,000,$379,454,000, or 67%77% of total capitalization, at December 25, 2010.29, 2012. The increase in equity in 20122014 over 20112013 was primarily a result of net income, and the effect of the exercises of stock options during the period, partially offset by purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock and dividends paiddeclared by the Company. The increase in equity in 20112013 over 20102012 was primarily a result of net income, andincluding the effectgain on the sale of the exercises of stock options during the period,discontinued operations, partially offset by the January 2011 purchase of the noncontrolling interest, purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock and dividends paiddeclared by the Company.

On June 29, 2012, Landstar entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, which matures on June 29, 2017, provides $225,000,000 of borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility, $75,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letter of credit guarantees. The initial borrowing of $60,000,000 under the Credit Agreement was used to refinance $60,000,000 of outstanding borrowings under the prior credit agreement, which was terminated.

The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The Company is required to, among other things, maintain a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, and maintain a Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, below a specified maximum. The Credit Agreement provides for a restriction on cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders on the Company’s capital stock to the extent there is a default under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement under certain circumstances limits the amount of such cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders to the extent that, after giving effect to any payment made to effect such cash dividend or other distribution, the Leverage Ratio would exceed 2.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis as of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement provides for an event of default in the event that, among other things, a person or group acquires 25% or more of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or obtains power to elect a majority of the Company’s directors. None of these covenants are presently considered by management to be materially restrictive to the Company’s operations, capital resources or liquidity. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the debt covenants under the Credit Agreement.

At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company had $40,000,000 inno borrowings outstanding and $32,754,000$33,042,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, there was $152,246,000$191,958,000 available for future borrowings under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Company has $45,146,000$63,761,000 in letters of credit

outstanding as collateral for insurance claims that are secured by investments totaling $50,162,000$70,846,000 at December 29, 2012.27, 2014. Investments, all of which are carried at fair value, include primarily investment-grade bonds and U.S. Treasury obligations having maturities of up to five years. Fair value of investments is based primarily on quoted market prices. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on measurement of fair value of investments.

Historically, the Company has generated sufficient operating cash flow to meet its debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both internal and through acquisitions, complete or execute share

purchases of its Common Stock under authorized share purchase programs, pay dividends and meet working capital needs. As a non-asset basedan asset-light provider of integrated transportation services and supply chainmanagement solutions, the Company’s annual capital requirements for operating property are generally for trailing equipment and information technology hardware and software. In addition, a significant portion of the trailing equipment used by the Company is provided by third party capacity providers, thereby reducing the Company’s capital requirements. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011the Company’s continuing operations purchased $10,539,000, $6,373,000 and 2010, the Company purchased $7,072,000, $4,337,000 and $27,505,000,$5,388,000, respectively, of operating property and acquired $43,077,000, $34,044,000$47,232,000, $49,138,000 and $14,986,000,$43,077,000, respectively, of trailing equipment by entering into capital leases. The Company purchased its primary facility in Jacksonville, Florida in 2010 for $21,135,000. Landstar anticipates acquiring approximately $65,000,000$73,000,000 in operating property, primarily new trailing equipment to replace older trailing equipment and information technology equipment, during fiscal year 20132015 either by purchase or lease financing. The Company does not currently anticipate any other significant capital requirements in 2013.2015.

Management believes that cash flow from operations combined with the Company’s borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement will be adequate to meet Landstar’s debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both internal and through acquisitions, pay dividends, complete the authorized share purchase program and meet working capital needs.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, were as follows (in thousands):

Long-term debt obligations represent borrowings under the Credit Agreement and do not include interest. Capital lease obligations above include $3,839,000$4,576,000 of imputed interest. At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company has gross unrecognized tax benefits of $2,329,000.$2,620,000. This amount is excluded from the table above as the Company cannot reasonably estimate the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. At December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company has insurance claims liabilities of $86,405,000.$46,002,000. This amount is excluded from the table above as the Company cannot reasonably estimate the period of cash settlement on these liabilities. The short-term portion of the insurance claims liability is reported on the consolidated balance sheets primarily on an actuarially determined basis. Included in purchase obligations in the table above is $41,034,000 of obligations related to trailing equipment to replace older trailer equipment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 29, 2012,27, 2014, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases as disclosed in the table of Contractual Obligations and Commitments above, that have or are reasonably likely to

have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Legal Matters

As further described in periodic and current reports previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Defendants”) were

defendants in a suit (the “Litigation”) brought in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “District Court”) by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. (“OOIDA”) and four former BCO Independent Contractors (the “Named Plaintiffs” and, with OOIDA, the “Plaintiffs”) on behalf of all independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company and its subsidiaries under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”). The initial complaint in the Litigation was filed on November 1, 2002. The Plaintiffs alleged that certain aspects of the Company’s motor carrier leases and related practices with its BCO Independent Contractors violated certain federal leasing regulations and sought injunctive relief, an unspecified amount of damages and attorneys’ fees. Following a second trial in August 2012 in which all claims against the Defendants were denied, the Litigation was settled in December 2012. Under the terms of the settlement, the Plaintiffs dismissed their remaining claims in the Litigation, each party agreed to bear its own costs and fees in the Litigation, the parties exchanged releases, and OOIDA made a contribution to the BCO Benevolence Fund, Inc., a non-profit corporation founded by the Company to provide financial assistance to BCO Independent Contractors in hardship situations.

Also as further described in periodic and current reports previously filed by the Company with the SEC, in June 2011, Landstar System, Inc. received a Civil Investigative Demand (the “CID”) from the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky (the “U.S. Attorney”) issued pursuant to a complaint (the “Complaint”) filed by a third party under the False Claims Act. The Company cooperated fully with the CID, which requested documents and answers to written interrogatories limited to freight hauled to or from Fort Campbell, Kentucky by certain subsidiaries of the Company and billed to the U.S. government. In November 2012, the Company was informed by the U.S. Attorney of the dismissal of the Complaint and the consent by the U.S. government to such dismissal. The Company believes this matter has been concluded.

On September 23, 2011, a jury sitting in a state court in Cobb County, Georgia, entered a damage award of approximately $40.2 million (such amount, plus pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest and a portion of plaintiffs’ attorney fees in an amount not yet determined are collectively referred to herein as the “Damage Award”) against Landstar Ranger, Inc., Landstar System Holdings, Inc. and Landstar System, Inc. While a judgment has been entered by the court on the verdict, execution on that judgment is stayed and no judgment has been entered on the pre-judgment interest claims and attorney fee claims due to the pendency of certain post-trial motions. The Damage Award arises out of an accident that occurred in February 2007 involving a BCO Independent Contractor leased to Landstar Ranger, Inc. Under the terms of the commercial trucking insurance program that Landstar had in place in 2007, Landstar retained liability for up to $5 million with respect to the accident giving rise to the Damage Award. Landstar has third party insurance and/or reinsurance policies in place that are expected to provide coverage for all amounts of the Damage Award in excess of such retention, including all related out-of-pocket expenses, such as the costs of an appeal bond, interest and attorney fees comprising the Damage Award that may be entered by the trial court or an appellate court in the future. The Company recorded a $5 million charge representing its self-insured retention in respect of this accident in the consolidated financial results of the Company in the 2007 first quarter. Accordingly, that portion of the Damage Award has been previously recorded by the Company and therefore did not reduce consolidated operating income or net income for the Company’s 2011 or 2012 fiscal years. Under the terms of the Company’s insurance policies, the Company is the primary obligor of the amount of the Damage Award, and as such, the Company has reported a $38.7 million receivable from the third party insurance providers in other receivables and a corresponding liability of the same amount in insurance claims in the consolidated balance sheets at December 29, 2012. The Company and its insurers have filed post-trial motions challenging the Damage Award and seeking a new trial and intend to appeal the Damage Award to the extent necessary following the resolution of those motions. No assurances can be given regarding the outcome of the pending motions or any such appeal, including as to the impact of the Damage Award on the premiums charged by the Company’s third party insurers from time to time for commercial trucking insurance.

The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation including those described herein, arising from the normal conduct of business. Many of these claims are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Based on knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, opinions of outside counsel, management believes that adequate provisions have been made for probable losses with respect to the

resolution of all such claims and pending litigation and that the ultimate outcome, after provisions therefor, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, but could have a material effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or year.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The allowance for doubtful accounts for both trade and other receivables represents management’s estimate of the amount of outstanding receivables that will not be collected. Historically, management’s estimates for uncollectible receivables have been materially correct. Although management believes the amount of the allowance for both trade and other receivables at December 29, 201227, 2014 is appropriate, a prolonged period of low or no economic growth may adversely affect the collection of these receivables. In addition, liquidity concerns and/or unanticipated bankruptcy proceedings at any of the Company’s larger customers in which the Company is carrying a significant receivable could result in an increase in the provision for uncollectible receivables and have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations in a given quarter or year. However, it is not expected that an uncollectible accounts receivable resulting from an individual customer would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition. Conversely, a more robust economic environment or the recovery of a previously provided for uncollectible receivable from an individual customer may result in the realization of some portion of the estimated uncollectible receivables.

Landstar provides for the estimated costs of self-insured claims primarily on an actuarial basis. The amount recorded for the estimated liability for claims incurred is based upon the facts and circumstances known on the applicable balance sheet date. The ultimate resolution of these claims may be for an amount greater or less than the amount estimated by management. The Company continually revises its existing claim estimates as new or revised information becomes available on the status of each claim. Historically, the Company has experienced both favorable and unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates. During fiscal year 2012,2014, insurance and claims costs included $11,000$6,664,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates. During fiscal years 20112013 and 2010,2012, insurance and claims costs included $505,000$10,909,000 and $1,582,000$11,000 of favorablenet unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively. The majority of the unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years related to four claims. It is reasonably likely that the ultimate outcome of settling all outstanding claims will be more or less than the estimated claims reserve at December 29, 2012.27, 2014.

The Company utilizes certain income tax planning strategies to reduce its overall cost of income taxes. If the Company were to be subject to an audit, it is possible that certain strategies might be disallowed resulting in an increased liability for income taxes. Certain of these tax planning strategies result in a level of uncertainty as to whether the related tax positions taken by the Company would result in a recognizable benefit. The Company has provided for its estimated exposure attributable to such tax positions due to the corresponding level of uncertainty with respect to the amount of income tax benefit that may ultimately be realized. Management believes that the provision for liabilities resulting from the uncertainty in certain income tax positions is appropriate. To date, the Company has not experienced an examination by governmental revenue authorities that would lead management to believe that the Company’s past provisions for exposures related to the uncertainty of such income tax positions are not appropriate.

The Company tests for impairment of goodwill at least annually, typically in the fourth quarter, based on a two-step impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. The model includes a number of significant assumptions and estimates including future cash flows and discount rates. Such assumptions and estimates necessarily involve management judgments concerning, among other things, future revenues and profitability. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value under the first step of the impairment test, then the second step is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. Only the first step of the impairment test was required in 2012 as the estimated fair value of the reporting units significantly exceeded carrying value.

The Company purchased two companies in July 2009, one of which was highly dependent on the U.S. automotive manufacturing industry and the other of which was a start-up. On the date of the acquisitions, the

Company recorded $26,300,000 of goodwill. The two acquired entities are considered one reporting unit as it relates to business valuation. As it relates to goodwill recorded upon the acquisition of these companies in July 2009, should the automotive industry experience a significant downturn and should the Company fail to add customers to the technology platform acquired with the start-up company, the Company could determine that its goodwill is impaired in the future. The Company will continue to monitor the economic environment and test for impairment of goodwill as necessary.

Significant variances from management’s estimates for the amount of uncollectible receivables, the ultimate resolution of self-insured claims and the provision for uncertainty in income tax positions and impairment of goodwill could each be expected

to positively or negatively affect Landstar’s earnings in a given quarter or year. However, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these items, given a range of reasonably likely outcomes, will not significantly affect the long-term financial condition of Landstar or its ability to fund its continuing operations.

Effects of Inflation

Management does not believe inflation has had a material impact on the results of operations or financial condition of Landstar in the past five years. However, inflation in excess of historical trends might have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the future.

Seasonality

Landstar’s operations are subject to seasonal trends common to the trucking industry. Results of operations for the quarter ending in March are typically lower than for the quarters ending June, September and December.

The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of its financing activities, primarily its borrowings on theits revolving credit facility, and investing activities with respect to investments held by the insurance segment.

On June 29, 2012, Landstar entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, which matures on June 29, 2017, provides $225,000,000 of borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility, $75,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letter of credit guarantees. The initial borrowing of $60,000,000 under the Credit Agreement was used to refinance $60,000,000 of outstanding borrowings under the prior credit agreement, which was terminated.

Depending upon the specific type of borrowing, borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest based on either (a) the prime rate, (b) the federal funds effective rate, (c) the rate at the time offered to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the Eurodollar market or (d) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin that is determined based on the level of the Company’s Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. As of December 29, 201227, 2014 and during all of the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2011,28, 2013, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was 1.22% and 1.15%, respectively.1.42%. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and 2011,2013, the average outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement was approximately $34,882,000 and $85,296,000, respectively. Assuming that debt levels on the$10,824,000. The Credit Agreement remain at $40,000,000, the balance at December 29, 2012, a hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in current rates provided for under the Credit Agreementmaturity date is estimated to result in an increase in interest expense of $400,000 on an annualized basis. Based on the borrowing rates in the Credit Agreement and the repayment terms, the fair value of the outstanding borrowings as of December 29, 2012 was estimated to approximate carrying value. All amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement are payable on June 29, 2017, the maturity date of the Credit Agreement.2017.

Long-term investments, all of which are available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, include primarily investment-grade bonds and U.S. Treasury obligations having maturities of up to five years. Assuming that the long-term portion of investments remains at $56,874,000,$66,462,000, the balance at December 29, 2012,27, 2014, a hypothetical increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would not have a material impact on future earnings on an annualized basis. Short-term investments consist of short-term investment-grade instruments and the current maturities of investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury obligations. Accordingly, any future interest rate risk on these short-term investments would not be material.material to the Company’s operating results.

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s Canadian operation are translated from their functional currency to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expense accounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the period. Adjustments resulting from the translation process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Transactional gains and losses arising from receivable and payable balances, including intercompany balances, in the normal course of business that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the operation are recorded in the statements of income when they occur. The net assets held at the Company’s Canadian subsidiary at December 29, 201227, 2014 were, as translated to U.S. dollars, less than 1%approximately 1.5% of total consolidated net assets. Accordingly, any translation gain or loss related to the Canadian operation would not be material.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)