UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122014

or

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number:001-13545 (Prologis, Inc.) 001-14245 (Prologis, L.P.)

 

 

 

Prologis, Inc.

Prologis, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland (Prologis, Inc.)

Delaware (Prologis, L.P.)

 

94-3281941 (Prologis, Inc.)

94-3285362 (Prologis, L.P.)

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address or principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(415) 394-9000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

AMB Property Corporation

AMB Property, L.P.

 

  

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Prologis, Inc.

 Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.L.P.

 6.50% Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.

6.75% Series M Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.

7.00% Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.

6.85% Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.

6.75% Series R Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, Inc.

6.75% Series S Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock4.000% Notes due 2018 New York Stock Exchange

Prologis, L.P.

 None1.375% Notes due 2020 NoneNew York Stock Exchange

Prologis, L.P.

3.000% Notes due 2022New York Stock Exchange

Prologis, L.P.

3.375% Notes due 2024New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Prologis, Inc. -NONE

Prologis, L.P. -NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Prologis, Inc.: Yes þ No ¨            Prologis, L.P.: Yesþ No¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Prologis, Inc.: Yes¨ Noþ            Prologis, L.P.: Yes¨ Noþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Prologis, Inc.: Yesþ No¨    Prologis, L.P.: Yesþ No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website; if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Prologis, Inc.: Yesþ No¨    Prologis, L.P.: Yesþ No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.¨þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

 

Prologis, Inc.:  þ    Large accelerated filer ¨    Accelerated filer
  ¨    Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨    Smaller reporting company

 

Prologis, L.P.:  ¨    Large accelerated filer ¨    Accelerated filer
  þ    Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨    Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Prologis, Inc.: Yes¨ Noþ            Prologis, L.P.: Yes¨ Noþ

Based on the closing price of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock on June 30, 2012,2014, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of Prologis, Inc. was $15,163,537,027.$20,348,477,088.

The number of shares of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock outstanding as ofat February 22, 201320, 2015, was approximately 462,807,491.512,138,000

.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of Part III of this report are incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 20132015 annual meeting of its stockholders or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

 

 

 

 


EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20122014, of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Prologis, Inc.” or the “Parent” mean Prologis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; and references to “Prologis, L.P.” or the “Operating Partnership” mean Prologis, L.P., and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “the Company”, “Prologis”,Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership collectively.

Prologis, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) and the general partner of the Operating Partnership. As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, Prologis, Inc. owned an approximate 99.59%99.65% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and 100% of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 0.41%0.35% common limited partnership interests are owned by non-affiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of Prologis, Inc. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, Prologis, Inc. has full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership.

We operate Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of Prologis, Inc. consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of Prologis, Inc. and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its direct or indirect subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, Prologis, Inc. consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, andpurposes. Since the only significant asset of Prologis, Inc. does not have significant assets other thanis its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore,Partnership, the assets and liabilities of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.

We believe combining the combined annual reportsreport on Form 10-K of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:

 

enhances investors’ understanding of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the Company’s disclosure applies to both Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership; and

creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

We believe it is important to understand the few differences between Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate as an interrelated consolidated company. Prologis, Inc.’s only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership. As a result,Company. Prologis, Inc. does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and issuing public equity from time to time. Prologis, Inc. itself does not issueincur any indebtedness, but guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the business, directly or indirectly, and holds the ownership interests in the Company’s investment in certain entities. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by Prologis, Inc., which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, its incurrence of indebtedness and the issuance of partnership units to third parties.

Noncontrolling interests, stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Prologis, Inc. and those of the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership’s financial statements include the interests in consolidated entities not owned by the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in Prologis, Inc.’s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership level, as well as the common limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, not owned by Prologis, Inc., which are accounted for as partners’ capital by the Operating Partnership.

In order to highlight the differences between Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, there are separate sections in this report, as applicable, that separately discuss Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, including separate financial statements controls and procedures sections, and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications. In the sections that combine disclosure of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of Prologis.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 

Description

 Page  

Description

 Page 
 PART I  PART I 

1.

 

Business

  4   

Business

  4  
 

The Company

  4   

The Company

  4  
 

Investment Strategy

  5   

Investment Strategy

  5  
 

Business Strategy

  5   

Business Strategy and Operating Segments

  5  
 

Our Operating Segments

  6   

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

  6  
 

Management’s Overview

  6   

Environmental Matters

  6  
 

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

  7   

Insurance Coverage

  7  
 

Environmental Matters

  7  
 

Insurance Coverage

  8  

1A.

 

Risk Factors

  8   

Risk Factors

  7  

1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  16   

Unresolved Staff Comments

  14  

2.

 

Properties

  16   

Properties

  14  
 

Geographic Distribution

  14  
 

Geographic Distribution

  16   

Lease Expirations

  17  
 

Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

  19   

Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

  18  

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  19   

Legal Proceedings

  18  

4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

  19   

Mine Safety Disclosures

  18  
 PART II  PART II 

5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  19   

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  19  
 

Market Information and Holders

  19   

Market Information and Holders

  19  
 

Dividends

  20   

Preferred Stock Dividends

  20  
 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

  21   

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

  20  
 

Other Stockholder Matters

  21   

Other Stockholder Matters

  21  

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  22   

Selected Financial Data

  21  

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  24   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  22  
 

Management’s Overview

  24  
 

Results of Operations

  27   

Management’s Overview

  22  
 

Portfolio Information

  32   

Results of Operations

  23  
 

Environmental Matters

  35   

Environmental Matters

  30  
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

  35   

Liquidity and Capital Resources

  31  
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

  39   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

  34  
 

Contractual Obligations

  39   

Contractual Obligations

  34  
 

Critical Accounting Policies

  40   

Critical Accounting Policies

  35  
 

New Accounting Pronouncements

  42   

New Accounting Pronouncements

  37  
 

Funds from Operations

  42   

Funds from Operations (“FFO”)

  37  

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

  45   

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

  40  

8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  46   

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  41  

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  46   

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  41  

9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  46   

Controls and Procedures

  41  

9B.

 

Other Information

  47   

Other Information

  42  
 PART III  PART III 

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  47   

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  42  

11.

 

Executive Compensation

  48   

Executive Compensation

  42  

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  48   

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  42  

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  48   

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  42  

14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  48   

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  43  
 PART IV  PART IV 

15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  48   

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  43  

The statements in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate, management’s beliefs and assumptions made by management. Such statements involve uncertainties that could significantly impact our financial results. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future — including statements relating to rent and occupancy growth, development activity and changes in sales or contribution volume of properties, disposition activity, general conditions in the geographic areas where we operate, our debt, capital structure and financial position, our ability to form new co-investment ventures and the availability of capital in existing or new co-investment ventures — are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and therefore actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that may affect outcomes and results include, but are not limited to: (i) national, international, regional and local economic climates, (ii) changes in financial markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, (iii) increased or unanticipated competition for our properties, (iv) risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions and development of properties, (v) maintenance of REIT status and tax structuring, (vi) availability of financing and capital, the levels of debt that we maintain and our credit ratings, (vii) risks related to our investments in our co-investment ventures, including our ability to establish new co-investment ventures, (viii) risks of doing business internationally, including currency risks, (ix) environmental uncertainties, including risks of natural disasters, and (x) those additional factors discussed under “ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors”Factors in this report. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements appearing in this report except as may be required by law.

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

The Company

We are the leading global owner, operator and developer ofleader in industrial real estate, focused on global and regional markets across the Americas, Europe and Asia. As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, we owned or had investments in, on a wholly-owned basis or through co-investment ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately 590 million square feet (55 million square meters) in 21 countries. We lease modern distribution facilities to more than 4,700 customers, including third-party logistics providers, transportation companies, retailers and manufacturers.

Details of the 590 million square feet, which represents an expected investment on an owned and managed basis we had properties and development projects totaling 554 million square feet (51.5 million square meters) in 21 countries. These properties are leased to approximately 4,500 customers, including third-party logistics providers, manufacturers, retailers, transportation companies, and other enterprises.

Of the 554 million square feet of our owned and managed portfolio$45.6 billion, were as of December 31, 2012:follows:

 

522537 million square feet were in our operating portfolio with a gross book value of $40.1$40.6 billion that were 94.0% occupied;and 96.1% occupancy;

2240 million square feet were in our development portfolio with a total expected investment of $2.1$3.2 billion that were 50.8%40.9% leased;

10$1.8 billion of land was available for future development;

13 million square feet consisted of valued added properties, properties in which we have an ownership interest but do not manage and other non-industrial properties we own, including assets held for sale;own; and

2.1% and 18.6% of the annualized net effective rent were attributable to our largest customer and 25 largest customers, accounted for 2.0% and 18.7%, respectively, of the annualized base rent.respectively.

Prologis, Inc. commenced operationsbegan operating as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997 and elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Internal Revenue Code”), and believes. We believe the current organization and method of operation will enable Prologis, Inc. to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership also was also formed in 1997.

We have investments in entities through a variety of ventures. We co-invest in entities that own multiple properties with private capital investors and provide asset and property management services to these entities. We refer to these entities as co-investment ventures. Our ownership interest in these entities generally ranges from 15-50%. These entities may be consolidated or unconsolidated, depending on the structure, our partner’s participating and other rights and our level of control of the entity. The co-investment ventures may have one or more investors. We also have investments in joint ventures, generally with one partner and that we do not manage. We refer to our investments in the entities accounted for on the equity method, both unconsolidated co-investment ventures and joint ventures, as unconsolidated entities.

Our global corporate headquarters are located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, and our global operational headquarters are located at 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239. Our otherOther principal office locationsoffices are in Amsterdam, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Shanghai, Singapore and Tokyo.

Our Internet website address iswww.prologis.com. All reports required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”(“SEC”) are available or maycan be accessed free of charge through the Investor Relations section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file suchsubmit material with, or furnish it to the SEC. The common stock of Prologis, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker “PLD” and is a component of the Standard & Poors (“S&P 500.

Merger of AMB and ProLogis and Acquisition of PEPR

On June 3, 2011, AMB Property Corporation (“AMB”&P”) completed a merger with ProLogis, a Maryland REIT (“ProLogis”) in which ProLogis shareholders received 0.4464 of a share of common stock of AMB for each outstanding common share of beneficial interest in ProLogis (the “Merger”). In the Merger, AMB was the legal acquirer and ProLogis was the accounting acquirer. Following the Merger, AMB changed its

name to Prologis, Inc. In May 2011, we also acquired a controlling interest in and began consolidating ProLogis European Properties (“PEPR”) (the “PEPR Acquisition”). Our results for 2011 reflect approximately seven months of the impact of the Merger and the PEPR Acquisition. Therefore, period to period comparisons may not be meaningful. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information relating to both the Merger and PEPR Acquisition.500.

Investment Strategy

We believe that gross domestic product (“GDP”) growthBoth macroeconomics and growth in global tradedemographics are important drivers of our business, including population growth, consumption and rising affluence. In developed markets, including in the U.S., Europe and Japan, the reconfiguration of supply chains, and the operational efficiencies that can be realized from our modern logistics facilities, are an important driver. In emerging markets, such as Mexico, Brazil and China, increases in affluence and the rise of consumer classes create demand for our product. Trade and GDPas new supply chains are correlated as higher levelsconstructed. Taken together, logistics real estate markets benefit from economic growth, but depend to a greater degree upon the modernization of investment, production and consumption within a globalized economy are consistent with increased levels of imports and exports. Assupply chains around the world produces and consumesdemographic growth.

We have investments in entities through a variety of ventures. We co-invest with partners and investors in entities that own multiple properties and provide asset and property management services to these entities. We refer to these entities as co-investment ventures. These entities may be consolidated or unconsolidated, depending on the structure, our partners’ participating and other rights and our level of control. The co-investment ventures may have one or more we believe that the volume of global trade will continue to increase at a rate in excess of growth in global GDP. Significant supply chain reconfiguration, obsolescence and customers’ preference to lease, rather than own, facilities also drive demand for quality distribution space.investors.

Our investment strategy focuses on providing distribution and logistics spacefacilities to customers whose businesses are tied to global trade and depend on the efficient movement of goods through the global supply chain to support global trade.chain. We have a deep globalworldwide presence with assets under management of $43.1$45.6 billion (based on expected investment) in our owned and managed portfolio spanning 21 countries on four continents. OurWe classify our properties are primarily located ininto two main market categories,categories: global markets and regional markets.regional. Global markets comprise approximately 30 of the largest markets tied to global trade. These marketsThey feature large population centers with high per-capita consumption rates and are located near major airports, seaports and ground transportation systems. Similar to global markets, regionalRegional markets benefit from large population centers but typically are not as tied to the global supply chainchain; instead, they serve local consumption and are often less supply constrained. We intend to hold primarily hold only the highest quality class-AClass-A product in our global and regional markets. As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, global and regional markets represented approximately 83%86% and 12%13%, respectively, of our overall owned and managed platformportfolio (based on our share of net operating income of the properties)properties’ gross book value). We also ownhave a small number of assetsinvestment in other markets which accountthat accounts for approximately 5%1% of our owned and managed platform, and from which we generally plan to exit from in an orderly fashion in the next few years, although we may continue to opportunistically invest in other markets. Our portfolio allows us toportfolio. We have deep knowledge of our local market knowledge,markets, construction expertise and a commitment to sustainable design.design across our portfolio. We are supported by a broad and diverse customer base comprisingand have relationships with multinational corporations that result in repeatable business.bring us repeat business across our portfolio. For more detail on our properties, see Item 2. Properties.

Business Strategy and Operating Segments

Our business strategy includescomprises two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and PrivateStrategic Capital. We generate revenue,

Real Estate Operations

Rental Operations.Rental operations represent the main source of our revenues, earnings net operating income (calculated as rental income less rental expenses),and funds from operations (or(“FFO”). See definition and a complete reconciliation of net earnings to FFO as defined in “ItemItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) and cash flows through our segments primarily through three lines of business, as follows:

Real Estate Operations Segment

Rental Operations- This represents the primary source of our core revenue, earnings and FFO.Operations. We collect rent from our customers underthrough operating leases, including reimbursements for the vast majority of our operating costs. We seekexpect to generate long-term internal growth in rental income by maintaining a high occupancy rate at our properties, byrates, controlling expenses and through contractual rent increases on existing spaceincreases. Our rental income is diversified due to our global presence and renewals on rollover space, thus capitalizingbroad customer base. We believe our property management, leasing and maintenance teams, together with our capital expenditure, energy management and risk management programs, create cost efficiencies that allow us to capitalize on the economies of scale inherent in owning, operating and growing a large global portfolio. Our rental income is diversified due to both our global presence and our broad customer base. We expect to generate long-term internal growth in rents by increasing our occupancy rate and through rent increases on existing space and renewals on rollovers. We believe that our property management and leasing teams, regular maintenance programs, capital expenditure programs, energy management and sustainability programs create cost efficiencies, allowing us to leverage our global platform and provide flexible solutions for our customers as well as for us.

Capital Deployment Activities -Deployment.OurCapital deployment includes the development, re-development and re-development activities support ouracquisition of industrial properties that lead to rental operations and areis therefore included with that line of businessrental operations for segment reporting. We develop and re-develop industrial propertiesdeploy capital primarily in global and regional markets to meet our customers’ needs. Within this line of business, we provide additional value creation by utilizing:We capitalize on the following: (i) theour land that we currently own in global and regional markets;bank; (ii) the development expertise of our local personnel;teams; (iii) our global customer relationships; and (iv) the demand for high qualityhigh-quality distribution facilities in key markets.facilities. We seekaim to increase our rental income and the Company’s net asset value of the Company through theby leasing of newly developed space as well as through the acquisition of newand acquiring operating properties. Depending on several factors, we mayWe develop properties directly or in co-investment ventures for long-term hold, for contribution into one ofto our co-investment ventures orand, occasionally, for sale to third parties. Properties that we choose to contribute or sell may result in the recognition of gains or losses. Generally, in the United States, Europe and Japan we are developing directly while in emerging markets such as Brazil, China and Mexico we are developing with our private capital partners in a variety of co-investment ventures.

PrivateStrategic Capital Segment -

We co-invest in propertiesinvest with private capitalpartners and investors through a variety of co-investment ventures. We have a directprivate and long-standing relationship with a significant number of institutional investors.public ventures which may be consolidated or unconsolidated. We tailor industrial portfolios to investors’ specific needs, and deploy capital in both close-endedwith a focus on long-term ventures and open-ended venture structuresfunds. We also access alternative sources of equity through publicly traded vehicles such as Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”) and other joint ventures, while providing complete portfolio managementFIBRA Prologis. These private and financial reporting services.public vehicles provide capital for distinct geographies across our global platform. We generally own 15-50%hold a significant ownership interest in these ventures. We believeventures, aligning our co-investment in eachinterests with those of our ventures provides a strong alignment of interests with our co-investment partners’ interests.partners. We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures by providingthrough asset

management and property management services. We may alsoservices and we earn additional revenues through additional services provided such asfrom leasing, acquisition, construction, development and disposition legal and tax services.services provided. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we may also earn revenues through incentive returnsfees during the life of a venture or promotes.upon liquidation (we refer to these incentive fees as promotes). We believe our co-investment program with private capital investorsventures will continue to serve as a source of capital for new investments, and provide incremental revenues for

our stockholders, as well asand mitigate risk associated with our foreign currency exposure. We expectplan to grow this business with the formation of new ventures, such as the two ventures discussed below under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and by raising additional third-party capital in ourgenerally through existing ventures.

Our Operating Segments

As discussed above, our current business strategy includes two operating segments: Real Estate Operations, which includes our Capital Deployment activities, and Private Capital. Please see “Item 1A Risk Factors”, our property information and market presence as presented in “Item 2. Properties”, a discussion of our segment results in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our segment footnote – Note 22 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information with regard to the investments and results of operations of our segments.

Competition

The existence of competitivelyCompetitively priced distribution space available in any market could impact our occupancy rates and have a material impactan adverse effect on our ability tohow much rent space and on the rents that we can charge, which impactsin turn could affect both of our operating segments. To the extent we wish to acquire land for future development of properties in our Real Estate Operations segment or dispose of land, we may compete with local, regional and national operators and/or developers. We also face competition from investment managers for institutional capital within our Private Capital segment.strategic capital business.

We believe we have competitive advantages due to (i) our our:

ability to respond quickly to customers’ needs for high-quality distribution space in key global distributionand regional markets; (ii) our

established relationships with key customers served by our local personnel; (iii) our teams;

ability to leverage our organizational scale and structure to provide a single point of contact for our global customers through our Global Customer Solutionsthe Prologis global customer solutions team; (iv) our

property management and leasing expertise; (v) our

relationships and proven track record with current and prospective investors in our privatestrategic capital business; (vi) our

global experience in the developmentdeveloping and management ofmanaging industrial properties; (vii) the strategic locations of our

well-positioned land that we expect to develop;bank; and (viii) our personnel who are experienced

team members with experience in the land entitlement process.

Customers

We have developed aOur broad customer base that is diverse in terms of industry concentration and represents a broad spectrum of international, national, regional and local distribution space users. At December 31, 2012,2014, in our Real Estate Operations, segment, we had 3,832more than 3,900 customers occupying 296.5271.6 million square feet of distribution space. In the unconsolidated properties we manage,On an owned and managed basis, we had 2,703more than 4,700 customers occupying 195.9519.1 million square feet of distribution space. In our Real Estate Operations segment, ourOur largest customer and 25 largest customers accounted for 1.6%1.9% and 18.7%19.5%, respectively, of our annualized basenet effective rent at December 31, 2012.

Within our Global Customer Solutions team, we develop long-term relationships with our customers and understand their business and needs, serving as their strategic partner2014, for real estate on a global basis. Keeping in close contact with customers and focusing on exceptional customer service sets us apart from other real estate providers as much more than a landlord. We believe that what we offer in terms of scope, scale and quality of assets is unique. Our in-depth knowledge of our markets helps us stay ahead of trends and create forward-thinking solutions for their distribution networks. This depth of customer knowledge results in greater retention and expanded service, which garners additional business from the same customer across multiple geographies. In our Real Estate Operations segment, approximately 50.0% ofand 2.1% and 18.6%, respectively, for our annual base rent is derived from customers who lease from us in more than one locationowned and more than one country.managed portfolio.

In Strategic Capital, we view our Private Capital segment, we considerpartners and investors as our customers. At December 31, 2014, in our private capital investors to be our customers. As of December 31, 2012,ventures, we partnered with 107more than 100 investors, several of which invest in multiple ventures.

Employees

We employ 1,445 persons in our entire organization.1,505 people across the globe. Our employees work in four countries in the Americas (875 persons)(900 people), in 1514 countries in Europe (385 persons)(360 people) and in three countries in Asia (185 persons)(245 people). Of the total, we have assigned 885955 employees to our Real Estate Operations segment and 10090 employees to our Private Capital segment. WeStrategic Capital. Further, we have 460 employeesindividuals who work in corporate and support positions who are not assigned to a segment who may assist with segment activities.that support both segments. We believe ourwe have good relationships with our employees are good. Ouremployees. Prologis employees are not organized under collective bargaining agreements, although some of our employees in Europe are represented by statutory Works Councils and as such they benefit from applicable labor agreements.

Management’s Overview

At the time of the Merger, we established our key strategic priorities to guide our path through the end of 2013. These priorities were:

to align our portfolio with our investment strategy while serving the needs of our customers;

to strengthen our financial position and build one of the top balance sheets in the REIT industry;

to streamline our private capital business and position it for substantial growth;

to improve the utilization of our low yielding assets; and

to build the most effective and efficient organization in the REIT industry and to become the employer of choice among top professionals interested in real estate as a career.

Align our Portfolio with our Investment Strategy

As discussed above, we have categorized our portfolio into three main segments – global, regional and other markets. By segmenting our markets in this manner, we were able to construct a plan that includes culling the portfolio for buildings and potentially submarkets that are no longer a strategic fit. We expect to use the proceeds from dispositions to pay down debt that is secured by the disposed assets, if any, repay other debt and to recycle capital into new development projects and/or strategic acquisitions.

Strengthen our Financial Position

We intend to further strengthen our financial position by lowering our financial risk and currency exposure and building one of the strongest balance sheets in the REIT industry. We expect to lower our financial risk by reducing leverage and maintaining staggered debt maturities, which will increase our financial flexibility and provide for continued access to capital markets. This financial flexibility will position us to capitalize on market opportunities across the entire business cycle as they arise. We expect to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations by borrowing in local currency where appropriate, and utilizing derivative contracts to hedge our foreign denominated equity and swap U.S. dollar–denominated debt into obligations denominated in foreign currencies. We expect to also lower our foreign currency risk by holding assets outside the United States primarily in co-investment ventures in which we maintain an ownership interest and provide services generating private capital revenue. We will accomplish this through contributions and sales to our existing and newly formed co-investment ventures, including the new ventures in Europe and Japan discussed below under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. In addition, we expect that new development projects, particularly in those emerging markets such as Brazil, China and Mexico, will be done in conjunction with our private capital partners.

Streamline Private Capital Business

We are working with our private capital investors to rationalize certain of our co-investment ventures. Some of our legacy co-investment ventures have fee structures that do not adequately compensate us for the services we provide. Therefore, we have terminated or restructured certain of these co-investment ventures. In other cases, we may combine some co-investment ventures to gain operational efficiencies. In every case, however, we have and will continue to work very closely with our partners and venture investors who have been and will be active participants in these decisions. We expect to continue with these activities during 2013. We plan to grow our private capital business with the deployment of the private capital commitments we have already raised, formation of new co-investment ventures, including the new ventures in Europe and Japan, and raising incremental capital for our existing co-investment ventures.

Improve the Utilization of Our Low Yielding Assets

We plan to increase the value of our low yielding assets by stabilizing our operating portfolio to 95% leased, completing the build-out and lease-up of our development projects as well as monetizing our land through development or sale to third parties.

Build the most effective and efficient organization in the REIT industry and become the employer of choice among top professionals interested in real estate as a career

We realized more than $115 million of cost synergies on an annualized basis, compared to the combined expenses of AMB and ProLogis on a pre-Merger basis. These synergies included gross general and administrative savings, reduced global line of credit facility fees and lower amortization of non real estate assets. We will continue to look for and achieve additional savings opportunities. In addition, we implemented a new enterprise wide system that includes a property management/billing system (implemented in April 2012), a human resources system (implemented in July 2012), a general ledger and accounting system and a data warehouse (implemented in January 2013). In connection with this implementation, we are striving to utilize the most effective global business processes with the enhanced system functionality, and have also implemented several analytical tools to further empower and assist our regional and local teams. In early 2012, we implemented two new compensation plans that we believe will better align employees’ compensation to our company performance. We believe these efforts and others will help us with the attainment of this objective.

See “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of our 2012 results and progress attaining the objectives outlined above.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

We maintain a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our Board of Directors (“Board”) and all of our officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website,www.prologis.com. In addition to being accessible through our website, copies of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct can be obtained, free of charge, upon written request to Investor Relations, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111. Any amendments to or waivers of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that apply to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, or the principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, and that relate to any matter enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, will be disclosed on our website.

Environmental Matters

We are exposed to various environmental risks that may result in unanticipated losses and affect our operating results and financial condition. Either the previous owners or we have subjected a majority of the properties we have acquired, including land, to environmental reviews. While

some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments has revealed an

environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 2119 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.8.

Insurance Coverage

We carry insurance coverage on our properties. We determine the type of coverage and the policy specifications and limits based on what we deem to be the risks associated with our ownership of properties and our business operations in specific markets. Such coverage typically includes property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from such perils as fire, additional perils as covered under an extended coverage policy, namely windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance. Insurance is maintained through a combination of commercial insurance, self insurance and through a wholly-owned captive insurance entity. The costs to insure our properties are primarily covered through reimbursements from our customers. We believe that our insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits that are customary for similar properties, business activities and markets and we believe our properties are adequately insured. However, an uninsured loss could result in loss of capital investment and anticipated revenues and earnings. See further discussion in “ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors”.Factors.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Our operations and structure involve various risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, distributable cash flow and value of our securities. These risks include, among others:

General

Disruptions in the Global Capital and Credit Markets may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Global market and economic conditions have been challenging with tighter credit conditions and slower growth in most major economies during the last few years. Although signs of recovery are emerging, there are continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, the availability and cost of credit, a lagging real estate market and geopolitical issues that contribute to increased market volatility and uncertain expectations for the global economy. To the extent there is turmoil in the financial markets, it has the potential to materially affect the value of our properties and investments in our unconsolidated entities, the availability or the terms of financing that we and our unconsolidated entities have or may anticipate utilizing, our ability and that of our unconsolidated entities to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance any outstanding debt when due and may impact the ability of our customers to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases.

The market volatility over the last several years has made the valuation of our properties and those of our unconsolidated entities more difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties and those we invest in through unconsolidated entities, that could result in a decrease in the value of our properties and our investments in unconsolidated entities. As a result, we may not be able to recover the current carrying amount of our investments in real estate properties, including our unconsolidated entities, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge in earnings where it is known in addition to the charges we previously recognized.

Any additional, continued or recurring disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

As a global company, we are subject to social, political and economic risks of doing business in many countries.

We conduct a significant portion of our business and employ a substantial number of people outside of the United States. During 2012,2014, we generated approximately 41.8%$369.6 million or $838.6 million21.0% of our revenue from operations outside the United States. Circumstances and developments related to international operations that could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow include, but are not limited to, the following factors:

 

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations in certain regions;

 

differing employment practices and labor issues;

 

local businesses and cultural factors that differ from our usual standards and practices;

 

volatility in currencies;

 

currency restrictions, which may prevent the transfer of capital and profits to the United States;

 

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and other laws;

 

potentially adverse tax consequences;

 

the responsibility of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws, e.g., with respect to corrupt practices, employment and licensing;

the impact of regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;

 

political instability, uncertainty over property rights, civil unrest, drug trafficking, political activism or the continuation or escalation of terrorist or gang activities (particularly with respect to our operations in Mexico);

 

foreign ownership restrictions in operations with respect to operations inthe respective countries; and

 

access to capital may be more restricted, or unavailable on favorable terms or at all in certain locations.

Our global growth also subjects us to certain risks, including risks associated with funding increasing headcount, integrating new offices, and establishing effective controls and procedures to regulate the operations of new offices and to monitor compliance with regulations such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act and similar laws.

Although we have committed substantial resources to expand our global platform, if we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with our global business or to adequately manage operational fluctuations, our business, financial condition, and results of operations and cash flow could be harmed.

In addition, our international operations and, specifically,we may be impacted by, the ability of our non-United States subsidiaries to dividend or otherwise transfer cash among our subsidiaries, including transfers of cash to pay interest and principal on our debt, may be affecteddue to by currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations and potentially adverse tax consequences, among other things.

The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

We have pursued, and intend to continue to pursue, growth opportunities in international markets where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency. At December 31, 2012,2014, approximately 40.6%$6.4 billion or $11.1 billion24.9% of our total assets are invested in a currency other than the U.S. dollar,

primarily the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. A significant change in the value of the foreign currency of one or more countries where we have a significant investment may have a material adverse effect on our U.S. dollar reported financial position, debt covenant ratios, results of operations and cash flow. Although we attempt to mitigate adverse effects by borrowing under debt agreements denominated in foreign currencies and using derivative contracts, there can be no assurance that those attempts to mitigate foreign currency risk will be successful. Hedging arrangements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements and the risk of fluctuation in the relative value of the foreign currency. The funds required to settle such arrangements could be significant depending on the stability and movement of the hedged foreign currency. The failure to hedge effectively against exchange rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

Disruptions in the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

To the extent there is turmoil in the global financial markets, it has the potential to adversely affect the value of our properties and investments in our unconsolidated entities, the availability or the terms of financing that we and our unconsolidated entities have or may anticipate utilizing, our ability and that of our unconsolidated entities to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance any outstanding debt when due and may impact the ability of our customers to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases.

Any additional, continued or recurring disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

Risks Related to our Business

Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of assets, which may reduce economic returns to investors.

Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of investments and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, significant expenditures associated with real estate investments, such as secured mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investments. Like other companies qualifying as REITs under the Internal Revenue Code, we are only able to hold property for sale in the ordinary course of business through taxable REIT subsidiaries in order to not incur punitive taxation on any tax gain from the sale of such property. While we may dispose of certain properties that have been held for investment in order to generate liquidity, if we do not satisfy certain safe harbors or we believe there is too much risk of incurring the punitive tax on any tax gain from the sale, we may not pursue such sales.

In the event that we do not have sufficient cash available to us through our operations or available credit facilities to continue operating our business as usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation, divesting ourselves of properties, whether or not they otherwise meet our strategic objectives to keep in the long term, at less than optimal terms, incurring debt, entering into leases with ournew customers at lower rental rates or less than optimal terms or entering into lease renewals with our existing customers without an increase in rental rates at turnover.rates. There can be no assurance, however, that such alternative ways to increase our liquidity will be available to us. Additionally, taking such measures to increase our liquidity may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, our ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

Risks Related to our Business

General economic conditions and other events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are geographically concentrated, may impact financial results.

We are exposed to general economic conditions, local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties. Our operating performance is further impacted by the economic conditions of the specific markets in which we have concentrations of properties.

As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, approximately 25.1%33.6% of our consolidated operating properties or $5.7$6.3 billion (based on investment before depreciation) are located in California, which represented 20.5%25.9% of the aggregate square footage of our operating properties and 23.1%31.9% of our annualized base rent.net operating income. Our revenue from, and the value of, our properties located in California may be affected by local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of or reduced demand for industrial properties) and the local economic climate. Business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors may adversely impact California’s economic climate. Because of the number of properties we have located in California, a downturn in California’s economy or real estate conditions could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

In addition to California, we also have significant holdings (defined as more than 3% of total investment before depreciation) in operating properties in certain global and regional markets located in Central & Eastern Pennsylvania, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, France, Japan, Mexico, New Jersey/New York City, South Florida and the United Kingdom.Canada. Our operating performance could be adversely affected if conditions become less favorable in any of the markets in which we have a concentration of properties. Conditions such as an oversupply of distribution space or a reduction in demand for distribution space, among other factors, may impact operating conditions. Any material oversupply of distribution space or material reduction in demand for distribution space could adversely affect our results of operations, distributable cash flow and the value of our securities.

In addition, the unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures in which we invest have concentrations of properties in the same markets mentioned above, as well as in markets in France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland and Seattlethe United Kingdom, and are subject to the economic conditions in those markets.

A number of our propertiesinvestments, both wholly-owned and owned through co-investment ventures, are located in areas that are known to be subject to earthquake activity. United States properties located in active seismic areas include properties in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Seattle. International properties located in active seismic areas include Japan and Mexico. We generally carry earthquake insurance on our properties located in areas historically subject to seismic activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our earthquake insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants and in some specific instances have elected to self insure our earthquake exposure based on this analysis. We have elected not to carry earthquake insurance for wholly ownedour assets in Japan based on this analysis.

Further, a number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane and/or flood risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants.

Our insurance coverage does not include all potential losses.

We and our unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures currently carry insurance coverage including property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from certain perils such as fire and additional perils as covered under an extended coverage policy, namely windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance, as appropriate for the markets where each of our properties and business operations are located. The insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties, business activities and markets. We believe our properties and the properties of our unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures are adequately insured. However, there are certain losses, including losses from floods, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots, that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and future revenues in these properties and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property.

Furthermore, we cannot be sure that the insurance companies will be able to continue to offer products with sufficient coverage at commercially reasonable rates. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds insured limits with respect to one or more of our properties or if the insurance companies fail to meet their coverage commitments to us in the event of an insured loss, then we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from those properties and, if there is recourse debt, then we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Any such losses or higher insurance costs could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

Investments in real estate properties are subject to risks that could adversely affect our business.

Investments in real estate properties are subject to varying degrees of risk. While we seek to minimize these risks through geographic diversification of our portfolio, market research and our property management capabilities, these risks cannot be eliminated. Some of the factors that may affect real estate values include:

 

local conditions, such as an oversupply of distribution space or a reduction in demand for distribution space in an area;

 

the attractiveness of our properties to potential customers;

 

competition from other available properties;

increasing costs of rehabilitating, repositioning, renovating and making improvements to our properties;

 

our ability to provide adequate maintenance of, and insurance on, our properties;

 

our ability to control rents and variable operating costs;

 

governmental regulations, including zoning, usage and tax laws and changes in these laws; and

 

potential liability under, and changes in, environmental, zoning and other laws.

Our investments are concentrated in the industrial distribution sector and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector.

Our investments in real estate assets are primarily concentrated in the industrial distribution sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities were more diversified.

Our operating results and distributable cash flow will depend on the continued generation of lease revenues from customers and we may be unable to lease vacant space or renew leases or re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire.

Our operating results and distributable cash flow would be adversely affected if a significant number of our customers were unable to meet their lease obligations. We are also subject to the risk that, upon the expiration of leases for space located in our properties, leases may not be

renewed by existing customers, the space may not be re-leased to new customers or the terms of renewal or re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to customers) may be less favorable to us than current lease terms. Our competitors may offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain customers when our customers’ leases expire. In the event of default by a significant number of customers, we may experience delays and incur substantial costs in enforcing our rights as landlord, and may be unable to re-lease spaces. A customer may experience a downturn in its business, which may cause the loss of the customer or may weaken its financial condition, resulting in the customer’s failure to make rental payments when due or requiring a restructuring that might reduce cash flow from the lease. In addition, a customer may seek the protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws, which could result in the rejection and termination of such customer’s lease and thereby cause a reduction in our available cash flow.

If we decide to contribute or sell properties to an unconsolidated entity or third parties to generate proceeds, we may not be successful.

We may contribute or sell properties to certain of our unconsolidated entities or third parties on a case-by-case basis. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms is affected by competition from other owners of properties that are trying to dispose of their properties; market conditions, including the capitalization rates applicable to our properties; and other factors beyond our control. If our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at favorable pricing or on favorable terms or at all. The unconsolidated entity or third parties who might acquire our properties may need to have access to debt and equity capital, in the private and public markets, in order to acquire properties from us. Should they have limited or no access to capital on favorable terms, then dispositions could be delayed. If we are unable to generate proceeds through property sales we may have to delay our deleveraging plans, which may result in adverse effects on our liquidity, distributable cash flow, debt covenant ratio, and the market price of our securities.

We may acquire properties, which involves risks that could adversely affect our operating results and the value of our securities.

We mayhave acquired properties and will continue to acquire industrial properties.properties, both through the direct acquisition of real estate and through the acquisition of entities that own the real estate. The acquisition of properties involves risks, including the risk that the acquired property will not perform as anticipated and that any actual costs for rehabilitation, repositioning, renovation and improvements identified in the pre-acquisition due diligence process will exceed estimates. When we acquire properties, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures. Additionally, there is, and it is expected there will continue to be, significant competition for properties that meet our investment criteria as well as risks associated with obtaining financing for acquisition activities. The acquired properties or entities may also be subject to liabilities, which may be without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it.

Our real estate development strategies may not be successful.

Our real estate development strategy is focused on monetizing land in the future through sales to third parties, development of industrial properties to hold for long-term investment or contribution or sale to an unconsolidated entity,a co-investment venture, depending on market conditions, our liquidity needs and other factors. We may expandincrease our investment in ourthe development, renovation and redevelopment business and we will complete the build-out and leasing of our development platform.portfolio. We may also develop, renovate and redevelop properties within existing or newly formed development co-investment ventures. The real estate development, renovation and redevelopment business involves significant risks that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities, which include the following risks:

 

we may not be able to obtain financing for development projects on favorable terms or at all;

 

we may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other governmental permits and authorizations;

we may seek to sell certain land parcels and not be able to find a third party to acquire such land or the sales price will not allow us to recover our investment, resulting in additional impairment charges;

 

development opportunities that we explore may be abandoned and the related investment impaired;

 

the properties may perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts;

 

we may not be able to lease properties on favorable terms or at all;

 

construction costs, total investment amounts and our share of remaining funding may exceed our estimates and projects may not be completed, delivered or stabilized as planned;

 

we may not be able to attract third partythird-party investment in new development co-investment ventures or sufficient customer demand for our product;

 

we may not be able to capture the anticipated enhanced value created by our redevelopment projects on expected timetables or at all;

 

we may experience delays (temporary or permanent) if there is public or government opposition to our activities; and

 

substantial renovation, new development and redevelopment activities, regardless of their ultimate success, typically require a significant amount of management’s time and attention, diverting their attention from our day-to-day operations.

We are exposed to various environmental risks that may result in unanticipated losses that could affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flow.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner, developer or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of removal or remediation of such substances could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such hazardous substances. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination.contamination.

Environmental laws in some countries, including the United States, also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties are known to contain asbestos-containing building materials.

In addition, some of our properties are leased or have been leased, in part, to owners and operators of businesses that use, store or otherwise handle petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, creating a potential for the release of such hazardous or toxic substances. Further, certain of our properties are on, adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, or upon which others have engaged, are engaged or may engage in activities that may release such hazardous or toxic substances. From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. In connection with certain divested properties, we have agreed to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.

We cannot give any assurance that other such conditions do not exist or may not arise in the future. The presence of such substances on our real estate properties could adversely affect our ability to lease, develop or sell such properties or to borrow using such properties as collateral, and may have an adverse effect on our distributable cash flow.

If we decide to contribute or sell properties to unconsolidated co-investment ventures or third parties to generate proceeds, we may not be successful.

We may decide to contribute or sell properties to certain of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures or third parties depending on a number of factors. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms is affected by: competition from other owners of properties that are trying to dispose of their properties; market conditions, including the capitalization rates applicable to our properties; and other factors beyond our control. If our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at favorable pricing or at all. The unconsolidated co-investment venture or third party who might acquire our properties may need to have access to debt and equity capital, in the private and public markets, in order to acquire properties from us. Should they have limited or no access to capital on favorable terms, then dispositions could be delayed. If we are unable to generate proceeds through property sales, this may result in adverse effects on our liquidity, distributable cash flow, debt covenants, and the market price of our securities.

We are subject to risks and liabilities in connection with forming co-investment ventures, investing in new or existing co-investment ventures, attracting third partythird-party investment and investing in and managing properties through co-investment ventures.

As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, we had an investment in real estate containing approximately 214.5261 million square feet held through unconsolidated entities.co-investment ventures, both public and private. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in unconsolidated entities,ventures, and we may and currently intend to develop and acquire properties through co-investment ventures and investments in other entities when warranted by the circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to form new co-investment ventures, attract third partythird-party investment or make additional investments in new or existing co-investment ventures, successfully develop or acquire properties through unconsolidated entities,ventures, or realize value from such unconsolidated entities.investments. Our inability to do so may have an adverse effect on our growth, our earningsresults of operations, cash flows and the market price of our securities.

Our partners in co-investment ventures involve certain additional risks that we do not otherwise face, including:

our unconsolidated investmentspartners may share certain approval rights over major decisions and some partners may managemade on behalf of the properties in the unconsolidated entities. Our unconsolidated investments involve certain risks, including:ventures;

 

if our partners fail to fund their share of any required capital contributions, then we may choose to contribute such capital;

 

our partners might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals that would affect our ability to operate the property;

 

the venture or other governing agreements often restrict the transfer of an interest in the co-investment venture or may otherwise restrict our ability to sell the interest when we desire or on advantageous terms;

 

our relationships with our partners are generally contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the agreements, and in such event, we may not continue to manage or invest in the assets underlying such relationships resulting in reduced fee revenue or causing a need to purchase such interest to continue ownership; and

 

disputes between us and our partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and result in subjecting the properties owned by the applicable co-investment venture to additional risk.

We generally seek to maintain sufficient influence over our unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures to permit us to achieve our business objectives; however, we may not be able to continue to do so.so indefinitely. We have formed publicly traded investment vehicles, like our publicly traded REIT in Japan,such as NPR and FIBRA Prologis, for which we serve as sponsor and/or manager. We have contributed, and may continue to contribute, assets into such vehicles. As with any of our publicly traded entities or funds, thereThere is a risk that we may not be able to continue to manage such entities and their assets in the event that our managerial relationship ismay be terminated.

The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.

Contingent or unknown liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition.

We have acquired and may in the future acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Contingent or unknown liabilities with respect to entities or properties acquired might include:

liabilities for environmental conditions;

losses in excess of our insured coverage;

accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business;

tax, legal and regulatory liabilities; and

claims for indemnification by the general partners, officers and directors and others indemnified by the former owners of our properties.

Risks Related to Financing and Capital

We face risks associated with the use of debt to fund our business activities, including refinancing and interest rate risks, andwhich may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to make required payments on our debt or are unable to refinance our debt.

We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness, that such refinancing would be on terms as favorable as the terms of the maturing indebtedness, or that we will be able to otherwise obtain funds by selling assets or raising equity to make required payments on maturing indebtedness. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flow and our financial condition would be adversely affected and, if the maturing debt is secured, the lender may foreclose on the property securing such indebtedness. Our Global Senior Credit Agreement, Japanese yen-based credit agreementfacilities and certain other debt bears interest at variable rates. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense under these agreements. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap or cap agreements. Such hedging arrangements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements. The funds required to settle any swap breakage arrangements, if any, could be significant depending on the size of the underlying financing and the applicable interest rates at the time of breakage. The failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position. In addition, our unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures may be unable to refinance indebtedness or meet payment obligations, which may impact our distributable cash flow and our financial condition and/or we may be required to recognize impairment charges of our investments.condition.

Covenants in our credit agreements could limit our flexibility and breaches of these covenants could adversely affect our financial condition.

The terms of our various credit agreements, including our Global Senior Credit Agreement and Japanese yen-based credit agreement,facilities, the indentures under which our senior notes are issued and other note agreements, require us to comply with a number of customary financial covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios, fixed charge ratios and other operating covenants including maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness. If we default under the covenant provisions and are unable to cure the default, refinance the indebtedness or meet payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flow, our operating results and our financial condition could be adversely affected.

Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our financing activity.

The credit ratings of our senior unsecured notes and preferred stock are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms and pricing of any debt we may incur. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event our credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining additional financing. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings may trigger additional payments or other negative consequences under our current and future credit facilities and debt instruments. Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively impact our refinancing and other capital market activities, our ability to manage debt maturities, our future growth, our financial condition, the market price of our securities, and our development and acquisition activity.

At December 31, 2014, our credit ratings were Baa1 from Moody’s and BBB+ from S&P, both with outlook stable. A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.

We are dependent on external sources of capitalcapital..

In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and by excluding any net capital gain) and we may be subject to tax to the extent our taxable income is not fully distributed. While historically we have satisfied these distribution requirements by making cash distributions to our stockholders, we may choose to satisfy these requirements by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, our own stock. For distributions with respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2012,2014, and in some cases declared as late as December 31, 2013,2015, the REIT can satisfy up to 90% of the distribution requirements discussed above through the distribution of shares of our stock if certain conditions are met. Assuming we continue to satisfy these distribution requirements with cash, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including acquisition and development activities, from cash retained from operations and may have to rely on third-party sources of capital. Further, in order to maintain our REIT status and not have to pay federal income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These short-term borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. Our ability to access debt and equity capital on favorable terms or at all is dependent upon a number of factors, including general market conditions, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of our securities.

Our stockholders may experience dilution if we issue additional common stock.stock or units in the Operating Partnership.

Any additional future issuance of common stock or operating partnership units will reduce the percentage of our common stockstock/units owned by investors. In most circumstances, stockholdersstockholders/unitholders will not be entitled to vote on whether or not we issue additional common stock.stock/units. In addition, depending on the terms and pricing of anany additional offering of our common stockstock/units and the value of the properties, our stockholdersstockholders/unitholders may experience dilution in both book value and fair value of their common stock.stock/units.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Our failure of Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences.

WePrologis, Inc. elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 1997. We believe we have operated so asPrologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe that ourthe current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code to enable usPrologis, Inc. to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, it is possible that we are organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow usPrologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause usPrologis, Inc. to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annualannually and others on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex sections of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, Prologis, Inc. must derive at least 95% of its gross income in any year from qualifying sources. In addition, wePrologis, Inc. must pay dividends to ourits stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of ourits taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly basis. The provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations regarding qualification as a REIT are more complicated in our casefor Prologis, Inc. because we hold assets through the Operating Partnership.

If we failPrologis, Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, wePrologis, Inc. would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which weit lost the qualification. If wePrologis, Inc. lost ourits REIT status, our net earnings would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved.

Furthermore, we own a direct or indirect interest in certain subsidiary REITs which elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. Provided that each subsidiary REIT qualifies as a REIT, our interest in such subsidiary REIT will be treated as a qualifying real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and any dividend income or gains derived by us from such subsidiary REIT will generally be treated as income that qualifies for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. To qualify as a REIT, the subsidiary REIT must independently satisfy all of the REIT qualification requirements. If such subsidiary REIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, and certain relief provisions did not apply, it would be treated as a regular taxable corporation and its income would be subject to United States federal income tax. In addition, a failure of the subsidiary REIT to qualify as a REIT would have an adverse effect on ourthe ability of Prologis, Inc. to comply with the REIT income and asset tests, and thus ourits ability to qualify as a REIT.

Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.

From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties, including by contributing properties to our co-investment ventures. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. We do not believe that our transfers or disposals of property or our contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue CodeService may contend that certain transfers or dispositions of properties by us or contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue CodeService would not prevail in any such dispute, if the Internal Revenue Code were to argue successfully that a transfer, disposition or contribution of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect us.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the federal income tax taws applicable to investments in REITs and similar entities. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and may impact our taxation or that of our stockholders.

Other Risks

Our business and operations could suffer in the event of system failures or cyber security attacks.

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication failures and cyber security attacks, such as computer viruses or unauthorized access. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, unauthorized access to information of ours and others, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.

Risks Associatedassociated with our Dependencedependence on Key Personnel.key personnel.

We depend on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. From time to time, our personnel and their roles may change. In connection with the completion of the Merger, there were changes to our personnel and their roles. While we believe that we have retainedretain our key talent and have foundfind suitable employees to meet our personnel needs, the loss of key personnel, any change in their roles or the limitation of their availability could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions and payments to security holders and the market price of our securities. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain our executive officers, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain key employees become more expensive, our performance and competitive position could be materially adversely affected.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other similar regulations could result in substantial costs.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, places of public accommodation must meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If we are required to make unanticipated expenditures to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, including removing access barriers, then our cash flow and the amounts available to make distributions and payments to our security holders may be adversely affected. Our properties are also subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life-safety requirements. We could incur fines or private damage awards if we fail to comply with these requirements. While we believe that our properties are currently in material compliance with these regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed that could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

We are subject to governmental regulations and actions that affect operating results and financial condition.

Many laws, including tax laws, and governmental regulations apply to us, our unconsolidated entities and our properties. Changes in these laws and governmental regulations, or their interpretation by agencies or the courts, could occur, which might affect our ability to conduct business.

Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.

The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management will continue to reviewcontinually reviews the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures

and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal control over financial reporting that may occur in the future could result in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our financial statements, a decline in the price of our securities, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

We are exposed to the potential impacts of future climate change and climate change relatedchange-related risks.

We consider that we are exposed to potential physical risks from possible future changes in climate. Our distribution facilities may be exposed to rare catastrophic weather events, such as severe storms and/or floods. If the frequency of extreme weather events increases due to climate change, our exposure to these events could increase.

We do not currently consider ourselves to be exposed to regulatory risks related to climate change, as our operations do not emit a significant amount of greenhouse gases. However, we may be adversely impacted as a real estate developer in the future by potential impacts to the supply chain and/or stricter energy efficiency standards for buildings.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

ITEM 2. Properties

We are invested in real estate properties that are primarily genericpredominately industrial properties. In Japan, our industrial properties are generally multi-level centers, which is common in Japan due to the high cost and limited availability of land. Our properties are typically used for distribution, storage, packaging, assembly and light manufacturing of consumer and industrial products. Based on the square footageThe vast majority of theour operating properties included inare used by our Real Estate Operations segment at December 31, 2012 (and discussed below), all of our properties are industrial properties; consisting of 92.8% usedcustomers for bulk distribution, 4.7% used for light manufacturing and assembly, 1.0% used for flex industrial, 0.9% used for on-tarmac and 0.6% used for other purposes.distribution.

Geographic Distribution

Our investment strategy focuses on providing distribution and logistics spacefacilities to customers whose businesses are tied to global trade and depend on the efficient movement of goods through the global supply chain. OurWe classify our properties are primarily located ininto two main market types,categories: global markets and regional markets. Global markets account for 84.7%regional.

We manage our business on an owned and managed basis without regard to whether a particular property is wholly-owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures. We believe that the operating fundamentals of our owned and managed portfolio are consistent with those of our consolidated portfolio and therefore allow us to make business decisions based on the property operations versus our ownership. As such, we have included operating property information for Real Estate Operations and our owned and managed portfolio. The owned and managed portfolio includes the properties (based on investment balance)we consolidate and comprise approximately 30the properties owned by our unconsolidated co-investment ventures reflected at 100% of the largest and most liquid markets tied to global trade. These markets feature large population centers with high per-capita consumption rates and close proximity to airports, seaports and ground transportation systems. Regional markets account for 11.6% ofventures, not our consolidated operating properties. Similar to global markets, regional markets benefit from large population centers but typicallyproportionate share.

Included in Real Estate Operations are not as tied to the global supply chain and are often less supply constrained.

The information in the following tables is as of December 31, 2012 for our consolidated operating properties, properties in our development portfolio and land, including 157321 buildings owned by entities we consolidate but of which we own less than 100%. All of these assets are included in our Real Estate Operations segment. This includes our portfolio of operating properties we developed or are currently developing.the equity. No individual property or group of properties operating as a single business unit amounted to 10% or more of our consolidated total assets at December 31, 20122014, or generated income equal to 10% or more of our consolidated gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012. These2014.

Dollars and square feet in the following tables do not include properties that are owned by unconsolidated entities.in thousands.

 

Consolidated operating properties in the Real Estate
Operations segment at December 31, 2012

(dollars and rentable square footage in thousands):

  No. of
Bldgs.
   Percentage
Occupied (1)
 Rentable
Square
Footage
   Investment
Before
Depreciation
   Encumbrances
(2)
 

Americas:

         

Global Markets:

         
    Consolidated - Real Estate Operations     Owned and Managed 
Operating properties  Rentable
Square
Footage
   Gross Book
Value
   Encumbrances (1)   Rentable
Square
Footage
   Gross Book
Value
 

Global Markets - Americas:

          

United States:

                   

Atlanta

   78     86.0   10,472       $ 424,410     $ 75,335       11,455    $495,377    $76,218     14,343    $657,146  

Baltimore/Washington

   41     94.6   4,492       299,283     35,188       5,967     524,429     115,225     8,073     706,223  

Central & Eastern PA

   11     97.8   5,309       285,152     69,977    

Central Valley, CA

   16     92.4   6,575       333,683     25,590    

Central Valley California

   10,093     553,989     86,451     10,197     558,138  

Central & Eastern Pennsylvania

   14,925     927,252     84,543     14,925     927,252  

Chicago

   154     91.8   25,890       1,469,246     222,846       28,888     1,620,872     187,287     35,591     2,137,078  

Dallas/Fort Worth

   114     96.0   17,633       774,282     161,134       20,971     982,684     160,562     24,405     1,245,974  

Houston

   57     98.7   6,015       271,037     55,036       8,574     461,757     92,131     12,373     754,346  

New Jersey/New York City

   109     94.3   14,187       1,070,086     184,581       17,364     1,384,633     134,335     21,926     1,978,072  

San Francisco Bay Area

   199     92.2   16,069       1,592,440     95,256       14,650     1,487,808     48,042     18,261     1,837,550  

Seattle

   26     97.5   3,386       317,331     14,292       3,821     362,005     47,252     10,923     1,044,750  

South Florida

   68     95.0   6,653       686,232     58,425       7,222     773,855     70,119     10,679     1,081,769  

Southern California

   227     98.4   42,215       3,740,092     495,623       48,233     4,223,267     288,407     58,793     5,295,266  

On Tarmac

   28     90.9   2,302       263,253     7,834    

Canada

   14     100.0   4,690       464,319     -       7,065     642,728          7,065     642,728  

Mexico

   85     92.6   13,969       770,367     196,335    

Regional Markets - United States:

         

Mexico:

          

Guadalajara

   60     4,379          5,872     315,122  

Mexico City

   387     24,901          10,762     724,319  

Monterrey

                  3,413     196,639  

Brazil

                  5,266     414,355  

Regional Markets - Americas:

          

United States:

          

Austin

   2,213     147,661     29,640     2,213     147,661  

Charlotte

   2,527     117,250     21,603     2,527     117,250  

Cincinnati

   17     97.8   3,387       116,234     44,907       5,899     256,015     132,023     5,899     256,015  

Columbus

   31     95.3   7,174       261,857     32,638       8,545     297,320     102,553     8,545     297,320  

Denver

   24     95.6   3,968       226,971     31,367       4,491     272,418     56,196     4,491     272,418  

Indianapolis

   22     93.3   2,614       94,862     41,079       5,095     206,916     87,282     5,095     206,916  

Las Vegas

   3,610     200,462     31,253     3,610     200,462  

Louisville

   8     93.7   3,435       141,268     22,067       3,435     144,441     14,580     3,435     144,441  

Memphis

   13     99.8   5,236       170,873     9,091       5,297     184,815     6,026     5,297     184,815  

Nashville

   25     94.0   2,957       83,783     9,056       4,660     178,113     65,827     4,660     178,113  

Orlando

   26     88.5   3,141       190,981     -       3,488     234,777     38,633     3,895     261,761  

Phoenix

   2,139     116,259     8,208     2,139     116,259  

Portland

   2,010     151,401     56,109     2,010     151,401  

Reno

   3,543     161,482     33,252     3,543     161,482  

San Antonio

   29     95.5   3,759       159,485     19,526       5,606     255,715     61,924     5,606     255,715  

Savannah

   1     100.0   346       16,890     -    

Other Markets - United States (11 Markets):

   106     94.5   16,776       776,964     112,890    

Mexico:

          

Juarez

                  3,106     135,764  

Reynosa

                  4,385     205,649  

Tijuana

                  4,217     204,525  

Other Markets - United States

   3,907     171,685     5,186     4,681     249,064  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Americas

       1,529     94.7   232,650       15,001,381     2,020,073       266,140     17,566,666     2,140,867     352,221     24,263,758  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Europe:

         

Global Markets:

         

Global Markets - Europe:

          

Belgium

   3     99.2   908       71,888     7,189       439     32,231          2,497     179,404  

Czech Republic

   278     20,142          7,737     518,874  

France

   67     93.6   17,215       1,290,990     211,503       1,873     97,795          32,010     2,354,233  

Germany

   21     99.3   3,688       252,767     32,708       1,161     65,688          20,405     1,655,157  

Italy

   1,277     76,600          8,813     498,953  

Netherlands

   16     89.4   3,515       282,811     25,008                      14,526     1,197,299  

Poland

   33     83.6   8,081       432,368     89,666       2,142     99,331          23,056     1,421,752  

Spain

   21     83.4   5,532       490,378     36,121       449     40,213          8,191     577,083  

United Kingdom

   39     96.4   7,666       745,172     171,244       834     79,825          21,033     2,784,984  

Regional Markets:

         

Czech Republic

   21     92.1   4,369       317,245     40,548    

Regional Markets - Europe:

          

Hungary

   19     87.0   3,178       178,597     6,550       285     17,717          5,837     362,611  

Italy

   23     85.3   7,400       466,725     78,513    

Slovakia

   1     100.0   287       16,947     -        549     28,796          4,897     314,811  

Sweden

   4     100.0   2,012       161,522     -        524     34,264          3,807     305,756  

Other Markets (2 Markets)

   5     96.1   1,276       64,139     -     

Other Markets - Europe

   1,275     58,865          1,275     58,865  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Europe

   273     90.9   65,127       4,771,549     699,050       11,086     651,467          154,084     12,229,782  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Asia:

         

Global Markets:

         

Global Markets - Asia:

          

China

   7     97.9   1,750       55,000     -        2,324     79,540          7,597     387,508  

Japan

   21     97.7   13,526       2,534,601     1,260,752       1,215     180,157          22,113     3,567,803  

Singapore

   5     100.0   942       149,669     -        959     140,303          959     140,303  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Asia

   33     97.9   16,218       2,739,270     1,260,752       4,498     400,000          30,669     4,095,614  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total operating portfolio

   1,835     94.1   313,995       $ 22,512,200     $ 3,979,875       281,724     18,618,133     2,140,867     536,974     40,589,154  

Value added properties (5 Markets)

   18     45.6   2,352       96,048     -     

Value added properties (2)

   558     17,319          6,008     342,611  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total operating properties

       1,853     93.7   316,347       $ 22,608,248     $ 3,979,875       282,282    $18,635,452     $2,140,867     542,982    $40,931,765  

 Investment in Land Development Portfolio   Investment in Land   Development
Portfolio
 

Consolidated land and development portfolio in the
Real Estate Operations segment at December 31, 2012

(dollars and rentable square footage in thousands):

 Acres Investment No. of
Bldgs.
 Percentage
Leased (1)
 Rentable
Square
Footage
 Current
Investment
 Total
Expected
Investment
(3)
 

Americas:

       

Global Markets:

       

Consolidated land and development portfolio in

Real Estate Operations

  Acres   

Estimated Build
Out Potential

(sq. ft.) (3)

   Current
Investment
   Rentable
Square
Footage
   Total
Expected
Investment (4)
 

Global Markets - Americas:

          

United States:

                 

Atlanta

  616    $25,656    1    100.0   1,119    $20,539    $43,925     473     6,619    $23,071     715    $30,869  

Baltimore/Washington

  106    13,137    2    40.5   171    15,136    17,078     39     400     1,567            

Central & Eastern PA

  311    27,187    1    0    493    11,710    25,257  

Central Valley

  1,155    37,521    1    100.0   1,017    24,912    117,226  

Central Valley California

   1,025     19,560     54,016     1,001     63,614  

Central & Eastern Pennsylvania

   188     2,474     26,079     3,009     149,410  

Chicago

  567    49,233                         510     9,479     38,791     330     19,912  

Dallas/Ft. Worth

  459    26,909    2    37.9   1,052    25,087    40,473     552     9,156     46,451     1,286     74,373  

Houston

  47    5,422    3    23.5   429    11,769    24,494     70     1,112     8,636     229     15,459  

New Jersey/New York City

  323    132,340    3    86.3   1,224    53,585    140,800     148     2,356     66,964     1,767     169,899  

Seattle

          1    0    241    5,547    16,995  

San Francisco Bay Area

   66     1,248     21,372            

South Florida

  377    148,691    1    89.2   190    12,606    15,580     316     5,629     158,140     330     30,626  

Southern California

  882    184,053    2    0    1,215    58,400    74,995     660     12,993     116,844     1,818     131,459  

Canada

  183    62,451    2    0    910    53,502    107,351     171     3,281     49,686     1,169     110,809  

Mexico

  901    177,060    5    8.1   1,237    43,660    72,453  

Regional Markets:

       

Mexico:

          

Guadalajara

   50     1,066     11,615     231     13,958  

Mexico City

   301     5,661     112,503     1,333     88,783  

Monterrey

   161     2,656     30,995     501     30,437  

Regional Markets - Americas:

          

United States:

                 

Central Florida

  129    25,686                      

Cincinnati

  15    1,480                      

Charlotte

   7     103     651     205     10,849  

Columbus

  199    6,692                         121     1,861     4,397     410     17,149  

Denver

  66    8,727                         26     444     4,175     795     46,465  

Indianapolis

  127    4,474                         13     231     981            

Las Vegas

   54     1,076     5,876     464     26,901  

Memphis

  165    7,293                         151     2,586     7,306     218     10,746  

Savannah

  229    13,097                      

Other Markets - United States (8 Markets)

  488    39,052    1    0    486    9,730    22,694  

Orlando

   122     1,768     27,055     124     8,637  

Phoenix

   38     698     3,058            

Portland

   11     181     1,390     208     14,232  

Reno

   117     1,911     5,116            

Mexico:

          

Juarez

   137     2,692     13,864     210     11,324  

Reynosa

   196     3,460     12,221     163     9,421  

Tijuana

   34     626     5,723            

Other Markets - United States

   401     6,051     30,552     740     46,931  
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Americas

      7,345    996,161    25    41.2   9,784    346,183    719,321     6,158     107,378     889,095     17,256     1,132,263  
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Europe:

       

Global Markets:

       

Global Markets - Europe:

          

Belgium

  30    10,363                         27     526     9,534            

Czech Republic

   217     3,504     42,074     1,132     69,935  

France

  503    89,911    3    48.4   769    37,924    55,543     449     8,398     78,831     880     65,637  

Germany

  116    22,405                         58     1,161     13,540     282     17,369  

Italy

   107     2,451     30,084            

Netherlands

  68    67,839                         56     1,538     47,789     657     45,817  

Poland

  775    96,606    3    100.0   466    11,375    25,420     634     12,215     74,576     486     28,292  

Spain

  100    15,717                         100     2,021     16,507     139     15,959  

United Kingdom

  987    257,055    3    100.0   698    36,968    76,575     609     9,401     211,340     2,719     370,444  

Regional Markets:

       

Czech Republic

  247    40,530                      

Regional Markets - Europe:

          

Hungary

  338    38,111                         335     5,604     35,348            

Italy

  107    32,840                      

Slovakia

  95    16,915    1    0.5   260    13,057    14,648     78     1,708     13,076     255     13,154  

Other markets (2 Markets)

  119    21,381                      

Sweden

                  447     35,649  

Other Markets - Europe

   118     2,600     19,641            
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Europe

  3,485    709,673    10    70.1   2,193    99,324    172,186     2,788     51,127     592,340     6,997     662,256  
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Asia:

       

Global Markets:

       

Global Markets - Asia:

          

China

  18    8,459    3    77.0   568    5,373    22,913     18     172     5,889            

Japan

  67    80,071    7    79.2   5,456    500,763    804,534     53     2,423     90,462     6,039     747,128  
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Subtotal Asia

  85    88,530    10    79.0   6,024    506,136    827,447     71     2,595     96,351     6,039     747,128  
 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total land and development portfolio

      10,915    $    1,794,364    45    57.4   18,001    $    951,643    $  1,718,954     9,017     161,100    $1,577,786     30,292    $2,541,647  

The following is a summary of our investment in consolidated real estate properties at December 31, 2012:2014 (in thousands):

 

  Investment Before
Depreciation
(in thousands)
   Investment Before
Depreciation
 

Industrial operating properties

  $22,608,248    $18,635,452  

Development portfolio, including cost of land

   951,643     1,473,980  

Land

   1,794,364     1,577,786  

Other real estate investments (4)(5)

   454,868     502,927  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $25,809,123  

Total consolidated real estate properties

  $22,190,145  

 

(1)Represents the percentage occupied forCertain of our operating properties and the percentage leased for the properties in the development portfolio at December 31, 2012. Operating properties at December 31, 2012 include development properties completed more than one year ago that may be in the initial lease-up phase, which reduces the overall leased percentage.

(2)Certainconsolidated properties are pledged as security under our secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds at December 31, 2012.2014. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a debt issuance that is secured by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s investment balance. In addition to the amounts reflected here, we also have a $44.3$18.3 million of encumbrances related to other real estate properties not included in the Real Estate Operations segment.Operations. See Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional identification of the properties pledged.

 

(2)Value-added properties represent properties that are expected to be repurposed to a better use or acquired properties with opportunities to improve operating challenges and create higher value.

(3)Represents the estimated finished square feet available for rent upon development of an industrial building on existing parcels of land included in this table.

(4)Represents the total expected investment when the property under development is completed and leased. This includes the cost of land and development and leasing costs. At December 31, 2014, 65% of the properties under development in the development portfolio were expected to be complete by December 31, 2015, and 25% of the properties in the development portfolio were already completed but not yet stabilized. A property is defined as stabilized when it has been completed for one year or is 90% occupied.

 

(4)(5)Included in other real estate investments are: (i) certain non-industrial real estate; (ii) our corporate office buildings; (iii) land parcels that are ground leased to third parties; (iv) certain infrastructure costs related to projects we are developing on behalf of others; (v) restricted funds(iv) land parcels that are held in escrow pending the completion of tax-deferred exchange transactions involving operating properties;leased to third parties; (v) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions; and (vi) costs related to future development projects, including purchase options on land; and (vii) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions.land.

InLease Expirations

We generally lease our properties on a long term basis (with a weighted average lease term of seven years). The following table summarizes the lease expirations of our consolidated operating portfolio for leases in place at December 201231, 2014, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any (dollars and February 2013, we announced the formation of two new co-investment venturessquare feet in Europe and Japan, respectively. We have 207 operating properties aggregating approximately $5.0 billion that we have contributed or expect to contribute these two entities in 2013. See further discussion below under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”thousands):

   Number
of Leases
   Occupied
Square Feet
   Net Effective Rent 
Year      $   % of Total   $ Per Square Foot 

2015

   851     42,596    $185,671     15.7%    $4.36  

2016

   837     53,225     217,042     18.3%     4.08  

2017

   773     51,082     224,117     18.9%     4.39  

2018

   484     36,944     173,210     14.6%     4.69  

2019

   395     30,749     138,710     11.7%     4.51  

2020

   183     13,529     65,701     5.6%     4.86  

2021

   92     10,334     43,440     3.7%     4.20  

2022

   37     5,116     22,695     1.9%     4.44  

2023

   41     6,145     30,735     2.6%     5.00  

2024

   32     6,169     29,425     2.5%     4.77  

Thereafter

   38     9,509     52,927     4.5%     5.60  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   3,763     265,398    $1,183,673     100%    $4.46  
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Month to month

   181     6,126        
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

Total

   3,944     271,524                 

Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

At December 31, 2012, we hadIncluded in our owned and managed portfolio are investments in real estate properties primarily industrial properties that we also manage,hold through our equity investments in unconsolidated co-investment ventures. These investments include 1,163ventures, primarily industrial properties aggregating 208.8 million square feet andthat we also manage. Below is a total gross book valuesummary of operating buildingsour unconsolidated co-investment ventures, which represents 100% of $17.6 billion. See further discussion inthe venture, not our proportionate share, at December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

   

 

Operating Properties

   Development
Portfolio -

Total Expected
Investment
   Investment
in Land
 
Unconsolidated Co-Investment Venture  Square
Feet
   Gross Book
Value
     

Americas:

        

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund

   50,491    $4,592,157    $    $  

FIBRA Prologis

   31,364     1,755,544     11,895     1,230  

Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund (“Brazil Fund”) and related joint ventures

   5,266     414,355     154,613     147,272  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Americas

   87,121     6,762,056     166,508     148,502  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Europe:

        

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund

   15,535     1,832,926            

Prologis European Properties Fund II

   68,928     5,516,778     6,231     2,475  

Europe Logistics Venture 1

   5,257     405,761            

Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl

   57,688     4,083,178     17,985     9,847  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Europe

   147,408     11,838,643     24,216     12,322  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Asia:

        

Nippon Prologis REIT

   20,898     3,387,646            

Prologis China Logistics Venture

   5,273     307,968     414,299     58,758  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Asia

   26,171     3,695,614     414,299     58,758  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   260,700    $22,296,313    $605,023    $219,582  

For more information regarding our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, see Note 65 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we and our unconsolidated entitiesco-investment ventures are parties to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters thatto which we are currently a party, to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information and Holders

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PLD”.“PLD.” The following table sets forth the high and low sale price of theour common stock, of Prologis, Inc. (AMB pre-Merger), as reported in the NYSE Composite Tape, and the declared dividends per common share, for the periods indicated.

 

  High   Low   Dividends (1)   High   Low   Dividends 

2011

      

First Quarter (1)

  $36.47    $31.75    $0.28  

Second Quarter (1)

   37.44     31.76     0.28  

Third Quarter

   37.46     23.94     0.28  

Fourth Quarter

   30.56     21.74     0.28  

2012

      

2013

      

First Quarter

  $36.03    $28.16    $0.28    $41.02    $37.04    $0.28  

Second Quarter

   36.62     30.03     0.28     45.52     35.09     0.28  

Third Quarter

   37.58     31.03     0.28     40.58     34.60     0.28  

Fourth Quarter

   36.80     32.31     0.28     40.99     35.71     0.28  

2013

      

First Quarter (through February 22)

  $40.74    $37.35    $0.28(2) 

2014

      

First Quarter

  $42.10    $36.33    $0.33  

Second Quarter

   42.66     39.72     0.33  

Third Quarter

   42.38     37.28     0.33  

Fourth Quarter

   44.05     37.12     0.33  

Our future common stock dividends may vary and will be determined by our Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results, estimated taxable income and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.

(1)The per share stock price and dividends in the first and second quarter of 2011 are different than the amounts disclosed in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. The difference is due to the distinction between legal and accounting acquirer. The pre-Merger information presented in the table above is historical AMB amounts, as it was the legal acquirer.

(2)Declared on February 27, 2013 and payable on March 29, 2013 to holders of record on March 12, 2013.

On February 22, 2013,20, 2015, we had approximately 462,807,491512,138,000 shares of common stock outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 6,2005,290 stockholders.

Stock Performance Graph

The following line graph compares the change in Prologis, Inc. cumulative total stockholder’s return on shares of its common stock from December 31, 20072009, to the cumulative total return of the Standard and Poor’sS&P 500 Stock Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index from December 31, 20072009 to December 31, 2012.2014. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in theour common stock of Prologis, Inc. (AMB pre-Merger) and each of the indices on December 31, 20072009, and, as required by the SEC, the reinvestment of all dividends. The return shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

 

*$100 invested on 12/31/0709 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright© 20132015 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

This graph and the accompanying text are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Preferred Stock Dividends

In order to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, we are generally required to make common and preferred stock dividends (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders in amounts that together at least equal (i) the sum of (a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains and (b) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii) certain excess non-cash income. Our common stock distribution policy is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow that ensures that we will meet the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and that allows us to also retain cash to meet other needs, such as capital improvements and other investment activities.

In 2012, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share. Our future common stock dividends may vary and will be determined by our Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.

In addition to common stock, atAt December 31, 2012,2014, we had sevenone series of preferred stock outstanding (“Series– the “series Q preferred stock.” On April 19, 2013, we redeemed all of the outstanding series L, Preferred Stock”, “Series M, Preferred Stock”, “Series O, Preferred Stock”, “Series P, Preferred Stock”, “Series Q Preferred Stock”, “Series R Preferred Stock” and “Series S Preferred Stock”).

Holders of each series of preferred stock outstanding have limited voting rights, subject to certain conditions, and are entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends based upon each series’ respective liquidation preference. Dividends for Series Q, R, and S are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December. Dividends for Series L, M, O and P are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of April, July, October and January. Dividends on preferred stock are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds legally available for payment of dividends. After the respective redemption dates, each series of preferred stock can be redeemed at our option. With respect to the payment of dividends, each series of preferred stock ranks on parity with our other series of preferred stock.

The following table sets forth the Company’s dividends paid or payable per share for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:31:

 

   Years Ended December 31, 
        2012           2011(1)     

Series L Preferred stock

  $1.63    $1.63  

Series M Preferred stock

  $1.69    $1.69  

Series O Preferred stock

  $1.75    $1.75  

Series P Preferred stock

  $1.71    $1.71  

Series Q Preferred stock

  $4.27    $3.20  

Series R Preferred stock

  $1.69    $1.27  

Series S Preferred stock

  $1.69    $1.27  

(1)The dividends are different than the amounts disclosed in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. The difference is due to the distinction between legal and accounting acquirer. The pre-Merger information presented above is historical AMB amounts as it was the legal acquirer. The Series Q, R and S Preferred Stock was issued in connection with the Merger in 2011 and exchanged for the outstanding C, F and G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of beneficial interest in ProLogis, respectively. Amounts reflect actual dividends paid or payable during 2011 subsequent to the Merger.

Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.

    2014   2013 

Series L preferred stock

   n/a    $0.41  

Series M, R and S preferred stock

   n/a    $0.42  

Series O preferred stock

   n/a    $0.44  

Series P preferred stock

   n/a    $0.43  

Series Q preferred stock

  $4.27    $4.27  

For more information regarding our dividends, see Note 1110 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Notes 1110 and 1413 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

Other Stockholder Matters

Common Stock Plans

SeeFurther information relative to our 2013equity compensation plans will be provided in our 2015 Proxy Statement or our subsequentin an amendment of this Form 10-K for further information relative to our equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected financial data related to our historical financial condition and results of operations for 2012both Prologis, Inc. and the four preceding years. As previously discussed, since Prologis was the accounting acquirer in the Merger, the historical results of Prologis are included for the entire period presented and AMB’s results are included subsequent to the Merger. Certain amounts for the years prior to 2012 presented in the table below have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 financial statement presentation and to reflect discontinued operations.Operating Partnership. The amounts in the tables below are in millions, except for per shareshare/unit amounts.

Prologis, Inc.

  Years Ended December 31, 
   2012  2011 (1)  2010  2009  2008 

Operating Data:

     

Total revenues (2)

 $2,006   $1,451   $840   $987   $5,329  

Total expenses (2)

 $1,898   $1,347   $1,454   $1,045   $4,851  

Operating income (loss) (2)(3)

 $108   $104   $(614)   $(58)   $478  

Interest expense

 $507   $468   $461   $373   $384  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (3)

 $(93)   $(267)   $(1,601)   $(368)   $(379)  

Discontinued operations (3)

 $63   $109   $331   $392   $(71)  

Consolidated net earnings (loss) (3)

 $(30)   $(158)   $(1,270)   $24   $(450)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders (3)

 $(81)   $(188)   $(1,296)   $(3)   $(479)  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — Basic:

     

Continuing operations (4)

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)   $(2.19)   $(3.47)  

Discontinued operations (4)

  0.14    0.29    1.51    2.18    (0.61)  
 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic (3)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)   $(0.01)   $(4.08)  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted:

     

Continuing operations (4)

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)   $(2.19)   $(3.47)  

Discontinued operations (4)

  0.14    0.29    1.51    2.18    (0.61)  
 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — Diluted (3)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)   $(0.01)   $(4.08)  
 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

     

Basic (4)

  460    371    220    180    117  

Diluted (4)

  460    371    220    180    117  

Common Share Distributions:

     

Common share cash distributions paid

 $520   $387   $281   $272   $543  

Common share distributions per share (4)

 $1.12   $1.06   $1.25   $1.57   $4.63  

FFO (5):

     

Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:

     

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares (3)

 $(81)   $(188)   $(1,296)   $(3)   $(479)  

Total NAREIT defined adjustments

  633    660    368    260    449  

Total our defined adjustments

     (60)    (46)    (71)    164  
 

 

 

 

FFO attributable to common shares as defined by Prologis

 $552   $412   $(974)   $186   $134  
 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Data:

     

Net cash provided by operating activities (2)

 $463   $207   $241   $89   $888  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (2)

 $530   $(233)   $733   $1,235   $(1,347)  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $(1,072)   $163   $(970)   $(1,463)   $358  

   As of December 31, 
    2012   2011 (1)   2010   2009   2008 

Financial Position:

          

Real estate properties, excluding land, before depreciation

  $24,015    $22,803    $11,346    $12,606    $13,234  

Land

  $1,794    $1,984    $1,534    $2,574    $2,483  

Net investments in properties

  $23,328    $22,630    $11,284    $13,508    $14,134  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

  $2,196    $2,858    $2,025    $2,107    $2,195  

Total assets

  $27,310    $27,724    $14,903    $16,797    $19,210  

Total debt

  $11,791    $11,382    $6,506    $7,978    $10,711  

Total liabilities

  $13,537    $13,268    $7,382    $8,790    $12,452  

Noncontrolling interests

  $704    $794    $15    $20    $20  

Stockholders’ equity

  $13,069    $13,662    $7,505    $7,987    $6,738  

Number of common shares outstanding (4)

   462     459     254     212     119  

Operating Partnership

   Years Ended December 31, 
    2012  2011 (1)  2010  2009  2008 

Operating Data:

      

Total revenues (2)

  $2,006   $1,451   $840   $987   $5,329  

Total expenses (2)

  $1,898   $1,347   $1,454   $1,045   $4,851  

Operating income (loss) (2)(3)

  $108   $104   $(614 $(58 $478  

Interest expense

  $507   $468   $461   $373   $384  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (3)

  $(93 $(267 $(1,601 $(368 $(379

Discontinued operations (3)

  $63   $109   $331   $392   $(71

Consolidated net earnings (loss) (3)

  $(30 $(158 $(1,270 $24   $(450

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders (3)

  $(81 $(188 $(1,296 $(3 $(479

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic:

      

Continuing operations (4)

  $(0.32 $(0.80 $(7.41 $(2.19 $(3.47

Discontinued operations (4)

   0.14    0.29    1.51    2.18    (0.61
  

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic (3)(4)

  $(0.18 $(0.51 $(5.90 $(0.01 $(4.08

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted:

      

Continuing operations (4)

  $(0.32 $(0.80 $(7.41 $(2.19 $(3.47

Discontinued operations (4)

   0.14    0.29    1.51    2.18    (0.61
  

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted (3)(4)

  $(0.18 $(0.51 $(5.90 $(0.01 $(4.08
  

 

 

 

Weighted average common units outstanding:

      

Basic (4)

   462    372    220    180    117  

Diluted (4)

   462    372    220    180    117  

Common Unit Distributions:

      

Common unit cash distributions paid

  $528   $388   $281   $272   $543  

Common unit distributions per unit (4)

  $1.12   $1.06   $1.25   $1.57   $4.63  

FFO (5):

      

Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:

      

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common units (3)

  $(81 $(188 $(1,296 $(3 $(479

Total NAREIT defined adjustments

   633    660    368    260    449  

Total our defined adjustments

      (60  (46  (71  164  
  

 

 

 

FFO attributable to common units as defined by Prologis

  $552   $412   $(974 $186   $134  
  

 

 

 

Cash Flow Data:

      

Net cash provided by operating activities (2)

  $463   $207   $241   $89   $888  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (2)

  $530   $(233 $733   $1,235   $(1,347

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  $(1,072 $163   $(970 $(1,463 $358  

   As of December 31, 
    2012   2011 (1)   2010   2009   2008 

Financial Position:

          

Real estate properties, excluding land, before depreciation

  $24,015    $22,803    $11,346    $12,606    $13,234  

Land

  $1,794    $1,984    $1,534    $2,574    $2,483  

Net investments in properties

  $23,328    $22,630    $11,284    $13,508    $14,134  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

  $2,196    $2,858    $2,025    $2,107    $2,195  

Total assets

  $27,310    $27,724    $14,903    $16,797    $19,210  

Total debt

  $11,791    $11,382    $6,506    $7,978    $10,711  

Total liabilities

  $13,537    $13,268    $7,382    $8,790    $12,452  

Noncontrolling interests

  $653    $735    $15    $20    $20  

Partner’s capital

  $13,120    $13,721    $7,505    $7,987    $6,738  

Number of common units outstanding (4)

   464     461     254     212     119  
  Years Ended December 31, 
   2014  2013  2012  2011 (1)  2010 (2) 

Operating Data:

     

Total revenues

 $1,761   $1,750   $1,961   $1,422   $827  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (3)

 $739   $230   $(106)   $(275)   $(1,605)  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stock/unitholders - Basic (3):

     

Continuing operations (4)

 $1.25   $0.40   $(0.35)   $(0.83)   $(7.42)  

Discontinued operations (4)(5)

 $   $0.25   $0.17   $0.32   $1.52  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stock/unitholders - Basic

 $1.25   $0.65   $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stock/unitholders - Diluted (3):

     

Continuing operations

 $1.24   $0.39   $(0.34)   $(0.82)   $(7.42)  

Discontinued operations (5)

 $   $0.25   $0.16   $0.31   $1.52  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stock/unitholders - Diluted

 $1.24   $0.64   $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  

Common share/unit distributions per share/unit (3)

 $1.32   $1.12   $1.12   $1.06   $1.25  

Balance Sheet Data:

     

Total assets

 $25,818   $24,572   $27,310   $27,724   $14,903  

Total debt

 $9,380   $9,011   $11,791   $11,382   $6,506  

FFO (6):

     

Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:

     

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares

 $622   $315   $(81)   $(188)   $(1,296)  

Total NAREIT defined adjustments

  299    504    633    660    368  

Total our defined adjustments

  (33)    36        (60)    (46)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FFO, as defined by Prologis

 $888   $855   $552   $412   $(974)  

Total core defined adjustments

  65    (42)    262    182    1,255  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Core FFO (6)

 $953   $813   $814   $594   $281  

 

(1)In 2011, weAMB Property Corporation (“AMB”) completed a merger (the “Merger”) with ProLogis, a Maryland REIT (“ProLogis”). In the Merger, AMB was the legal acquirer and PEPR Acquisition (see Note 3ProLogis was the accounting acquirer. Following the Merger, AMB changed its name to Prologis, Inc. In 2011, we also completed an acquisition of one of our Consolidated Financial Statementsunconsolidated ventures in Item 8 for additional information).Europe. Activity in 2011 included five months of results of ProLogis, as it was the accounting acquirer in the Merger and seven months of results in connection withof the combined company resulting from the Merger and PEPR Acquisition.the acquisition in Europe.

(2)During 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we contributed certain properties to unconsolidated entities with any resulting gain or loss reflectedincludes the results of ProLogis, as net gainsit was the accounting acquirer in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and as cash provided by investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In 2008, our segments were slightly different and therefore we reflected these contributions as gross revenues and expenses and as cash provided by operating activities.the Merger.

 

(3)During 2012, weWe recognized impairment chargessignificant net gains on dispositions of $283.5 million on certaininvestments in real estate properties, which included $30.6 millionand revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest of $0.7 billion and $0.6 billion inDiscontinued Operations, 2014 and $16.1 million related to other assets. During 2011, we recognized impairment charges of $23.9 million on certain real estate properties, which included $2.7 million inDiscontinued Operations, and $126.4 million related to goodwill and other assets. During2013, respectively. In 2010, we recognized impairment charges of $824.3 million on$1.2 billion related to certain of ourinvestments in real estate properties, which included $87.7 million inDiscontinued Operations, and $412.7 million related to goodwill and other assets. During 2009, we recognized impairment charges of $331.6 million on certain of our real estate properties and $163.6 million related to goodwill and other assets. During 2008, we recognized impairment charges of $274.7 million on certain of our real estate properties and $320.6 million related to goodwill and other assets. In addition, during 2008, we recognized impairment charges of $198.2 million inDiscontinued Operations related to the net assets of our China operations that were reclassified as held for sale and our share of impairment charges recorded by an unconsolidated entity of $108.2 million. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information related to our impairment charges.

(4)goodwill. The historical shares and units of ProLogis were adjusted by the Merger exchange ratio of 0.4464 for the periods prior to the Merger. As a result, the per share/unit calculations and shares/units outstanding were also adjusted.

 

(4)For 2014 and 2013, the amounts for the Operating Partnership were the same as Prologis, Inc. Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders for the Operating Partnership was $(0.34) and $0.16 for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in 2012, and was $(0.82) and $0.31 for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in 2011. Pre-Merger, there was no Operating Partnership.

(5)In 2014, the accounting standard changed for classifying and reporting discontinued operations and as such, none of our dispositions in 2014 met the qualifications to be reported as discontinued operations.

(6)FFO; FFO, as defined by Prologis and Core FFO are non-GAAP measures used in the real estate industry. See definitions and a complete reconciliation of net earnings to FFO and Core FFO in “ItemItem  7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.Operations.

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report and the matters described under “ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors”.Factors.

Management’s Overview

AtWe believe the timescale and quality of our operating platform, the Merger,skills of our team and the strength of our balance sheet give us unique competitive advantages. Our plan to grow revenue, earnings, net operating income (“NOI”), cash flows and Core FFO (see below for definition) is based on:

Rising Rents.Market rents are increasing across many of our markets. We expect growth to continue as demand for logistics facilities is strong across the globe. As many of our leases originated during low rent period following the global financial crisis, there is considerable room for growth of in-place leases, which translates into increased NOI, earnings and cash flow. We had positive rent change on rollovers (when comparing the net effective rent of the new lease to the prior lease for the same space) during each quarter of 2014, ranging between 6.2% and 9.7%, and the fourth quarter marked the eighth consecutive quarter of positive rental increases.

Value Creation from Development.We believe a successful development program involves maintaining control of well-positioned land. Based on our current estimates, our land bank has the potential to support the development of nearly 180 million additional square feet. We believe the carrying value of our land bank is below its current fair value, and we expect to realize this value going forward through development or land sales. During 2014, in our owned and managed portfolio, we stabilized development projects with a total expected investment of $1.1 billion. We estimate that post-stabilization, the value of these buildings will be approximately 23.0% more than their book value or the cost to develop (defined as estimated margin and calculated using estimated yield and capitalization rates from our underwriting models).

Economies of Scale from Growth in Assets Under Management.We believe we have the infrastructure and an acquisition pipeline that will allow us to increase our investments in real estate, with minimal increases to general and administrative expenses. During 2014, our owned and managed real estate assets increased through the acquisition of $1.5 billion of buildings, principally in our unconsolidated ventures in Europe, and development starts with a total expected investment of $2.0 billion; offset partially by dispositions to third parties of $1.5 billion. With all of this activity, we had minimal incremental gross general and administrative expenses.

Summary of 2014

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we established our key strategic priorities to guide our path throughcompleted the end of 2013. These priorities were:following activities as further described in the Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

to align ourIn January, we closed on a U.S. co-investment venture, Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (“USLV”), in which we have a 55% equity ownership and consolidate for financial reporting purposes. At closing, the venture acquired a portfolio with our investment strategy while serving the needs of our customers;66 operating properties from us, aggregating 12.8 million square feet for a purchase price of $1.0 billion.

 

to strengthen our financial positionIn June, we completed the initial public offering for FIBRA Prologis, a Mexican REIT on the Mexican Stock Exchange. In connection with the offering, FIBRA Prologis purchased its initial portfolio of $1.6 billion from us and build one of the top balance sheets in the REIT industry;

to streamline our private capital business and position it for substantial growth;

to improve the utilization of our low yielding assets; and

to build the most effective and efficient organization in the REIT industry and to become the employer of choice among top professionals interested in real estate as a career.

Align our Portfolio with our Investment Strategy

We have categorized our portfolio into three main segments – global, regional and other markets. By segmenting our markets in this manner, we were able to construct a plan that includes culling the portfolio for buildings and potentially submarkets that are no longer a strategic fit. We expect to use the proceeds from dispositions to pay down debt that is secured by the disposed assets, if any, repay other debt and to recycle capital into new development projects and/or strategic acquisitions.

Strengthen our Financial Position

We intend to further strengthen our financial position by lowering our financial risk and currency exposure and building one of the strongest balance sheets in the REIT industry. We expect to lower our financial risk by reducing leverage and maintaining staggered debt maturities, which will increase our financial flexibility and provide for continued access to capital markets. This financial flexibility will position us to capitalize on market opportunities across the entire business cycle as they arise. We expect to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations by borrowing in local currency where appropriate, and utilizing derivative contracts to hedge our foreign denominated equity and swap U.S. dollar–denominated debt into obligations denominated in foreign currencies. We expect to also lower our foreign currency risk by holding assets outside the United States primarily in co-investment ventures in which we maintain an ownership interest and provide services generating private capital revenue. We will accomplish this through contributions and sales to our existing and newly formed co-investment ventures, including the new ventures in Europe and Japan discussed below. In addition, we expect that new development projects, particularly in those emerging markets such as Brazil, China and Mexico, will be done in conjunction with our private capital partners.

Streamline Private Capital Business

We are working with our private capital investors to rationalize certaintwo of our co-investment ventures. Some of our legacy co-investment ventures have fee structures that do not adequately compensate us for the services we provide. Therefore, we have terminated or restructured certain of these co-investment ventures. In other cases, we may combine some co-investment ventures to gain operational efficiencies. In every case, however, we have and will continue to work very closely with our partners and venture investors who have been and will be active participantsWe received equity units in these decisions. We expect to continue with these activities during 2013. We plan to grow our private capital business with the deployment of the private capital commitments we have already raised, formation of new co-investment ventures, including the new venturesFIBRA Prologis in Europe and Japan, and raising incremental capitalexchange for our existing co-investment ventures.

Improve the Utilization of Our Low Yielding Assets

We plan to increase the value of our low yielding assets by stabilizing our operating portfolio to 95% leased, completing the build-out and lease-up of our development projects as well as monetizing our land through development or sale to third parties.

Build the most effective and efficient organizationcombined investments resulting in the REIT industry and become the employer of choice among top professionals interesteda 45% ownership interest in real estate as a career

We realized more than $115 million of cost synergies on an annualized basis, compared to the combined expenses of AMB and ProLogis on a pre-Merger basis. These synergies included gross general and administrative savings, reduced global line of credit facility fees and lower amortization of non real estate assets. We will continue to look for and achieve additional savings opportunities. In addition, we implemented a new enterprise wide system that includes a property management/billing system (implemented in April 2012), a human resources system (implemented in July 2012), a general ledger and accounting system and a data warehouse (implemented in January 2013). In connection with this implementation, we are striving to utilize the most effective global business processes with the enhanced system functionality, and have also implemented several analytical tools to further empower and assist our regional and local teams. In early 2012, we implemented two new compensation plansFIBRA Prologis that we believe will better align employees’ compensation to our company performance. We believe these efforts and others will help us withaccount for under the attainment of this objective.equity method.

Summary of 2012

We earned a promote of $42.1 million in June from our co-investment venture, Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (“USLF”), which was based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investors over the previous three calendar years. Of that amount, $31.3 million represented the third-party investors’ portion and is reflected inStrategic Capital Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

In supportWe increased our ownership of our objective to streamline our private capital co-investment ventures, we successfully concluded five co-investment ventures (six since the Merger) and one other unconsolidated joint venture (further discussed in Notes 3 and 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8), as follows:

During the third quarter, we completed the delisting of PEPR from two European stock exchanges and we acquired 100% of its assets and liabilities. We plan to contribute the majority of these properties to a new co-investment venture as discussed below.

During the first quarter, we acquired our partner’s interest in Prologis North AmericaAmerican Industrial Fund II (“NAIF II”NAIF”) to 66.1% by acquiring equity units from all but one partner for an aggregate purchase price of $679.0 million, which resulted in us obtaining control over and dissolved Prologis California and divided the portfolio equally with our partner. In the fourth quarter, we dissolved Prologis North America Properties Fund I (“Fund I”) and divided the portfolio according to the ownership of each partner. These three transactions increased our investment in real estate by $2.2 billion and our debt by $1.4 billion. We recognized net gains on acquisitions of real estate properties of $294.2 million asconsolidating NAIF. As a result of adjustingremeasuring our equity investment to fair value atupon consolidation in the timefourth quarter, we recognized a gain of consolidation. We refer to these transactions collectively as “Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions”.$201.3 million.

 

We concluded Prologis North American Properties Fund XI by disposinginvested $587.2 million in three of our European unconsolidated co-investment ventures, which represented our proportionate ownership interest, for the remaining asset in the co-investment venture during the third quarter.acquisition of properties and repayment of debt.

 

InWe generated net proceeds of $3.2 billion and net gains of $524.5 million from the fourth quarter, we dissolved onecontribution and disposition of real estate investments, including the initial portfolio of FIBRA Prologis discussed above. The gains were principally driven by dispositions in the United States and contribution of stabilized properties in Japan and Mexico.

We issued €1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) of senior notes, entered into a new yen term loan and replaced our other unconsolidated jointeuro term loan. We used the net proceeds to buy back senior notes through private transactions, repay secured mortgage debt, fund additional investments in our co-investment ventures and divided the portfolio according to the ownership of the partners.for general corporate purposes. This activity reduced our weighted average interest rate and extended our maturities, as further discussed below in Liquidity and Capital Resources.

 

In December, 2012, we announced our plan to form two new venturesreceived proceeds of $353.9 million through the issuance of equity securities from the exercise of a warrant issued in Japan and Europe:

On December 12, we announcedconnection with the approval from our Board to sponsor a Japanese REIT (“J-REIT”) to serve as the long-term investment vehicle for our properties developed in Japan. In early 2013, we launched the initial public offering for Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”). On February 14, 2013, NPR was listed on the Japan Stock Exchange and commenced trading. At that time, NPR acquired a portfolioformation of 12 properties from us for an aggregate purchase price of ¥173 billion ($1.9 billion), resulting in ¥153 billion ($1.7 billion at February 14, 2013) in net cash proceeds. We will retain at least a 15% equity ownership interest in NPR and will provide pipeline, operational and personnel assistance under a support agreement. As a result of this transaction, in the first quarter we will recognize a gain of approximately $300 million after the deferral of the gain related to our ongoing investment. We intend to use the proceeds primarily for the repayment of debt and future investment in Japan.

On December 20, we signed a definitive agreement to form a euro-denominated co-investment venture, Prologis European Logistics Partners SarlSàrl (“PELP”). Our partner is Norges Bank Investment Management, which is and through our at-the-market (“ATM”) program. See Note 10 to the manager of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. PELP will be structured as a 50/50 joint venture. The venture has an initial term of 15 years, which may be extendedConsolidated Financial Statements for additional 15-year periods. We will have the ability to reduceinformation about our ownership to 20% following the second anniversary of closing. The venture will acquire a portfolio of high-quality properties currently owned by us in 11 target European global markets. We expect to contribute 195 properties for total estimated proceeds of approximately of €2.3 billion ($3.1 billion at December 31, 2012). As the expected proceeds were less than our carrying cost at December 31, 2012, we recognized an impairment charge of $135 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 related to the expected contribution in March 2013. This charge represented the loss on the entire portfolio of properties and was driven primarily by properties that we had developed during 2008 and 2009 at peak values.ATM program.

Although our strategic objective is to further improve our credit metrics, we temporarily increased our total debt to $11.8 billion at December 31, 2012 from $11.4 billion at December 31, 2011. Our significant debt activity during the year was as follows:

We increased our debt by $1.4 billion in connection with the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions, as discussed above.

We issued secured property-level debt on assets in Japan (known as TMK bonds) or increased existing TMK bonds for a combined amount of ¥49.0 billion ($569.0 million as of December 31, 2012).

We entered into a €487.5 million ($648.5 million as of December 31, 2012) multi-currency senior term loan agreement and used the proceeds to pay off two outstanding term loans with the remainder used to pay down our credit facilities.

We repaid $1.9 billion of debt with the proceeds from dispositions and contributions of properties. In 2013, we plan to significantly reduce debt with the proceeds received from contributions to the two co-investment ventures discussed above, along with other dispositions and contributions of properties as we align our portfolio with our investment strategy.

In order to reduce our exposure to the risk of movements in exchange rates, we entered into derivative contracts with an aggregate notional amount of €1.0 billion to hedge our euro denominated net investment. These hedges qualify for hedge accounting. We plan to further reduce our currency risk by completing the contribution of real estate properties to co-investment ventures in Japan and Europe in which we maintain an ownership interest (as discussed above).

We generated aggregate proceeds of $2.0 billion from the disposition of land, land subject to ground leases and 200 operating buildings to third parties and the contribution of 25 operating buildings to three unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We used the proceeds primarily to reduce our outstanding debt, acquire real estate properties and fund our development activities. We recognized net gains of $19.3 million in continuing operations and $65.9 million in discontinued operations as a result of these transactions.

We commenced construction of 40 projects on an owned and managed basis aggregating 16.9 million square feet with a total expected investment of $1.6 billion (our share was $1.4 billion), including 20 projects (or 57% of the total expected investment) that were 100% leased prior to the start of development. We used $384.2 million of land we already owned for these projects. This represents an increase in development activity that we expect to further increase in 2013.

We leased a total of 145.3 million square feet in our owned and managed portfolio and increased the occupancy of the total operating portfolio to 94.0% and 94.5% leased at December 31, 2012 as compared to 92.2% occupied and 92.5% leased at December 31, 2011.

We increased the percentage of our total owned and managed portfolio that is in global markets to 84.5% (based on gross investment balance).

Operational Outlook

The recovery in industrial real estate markets continues around the world. We believe all signals point to a positive outlook for our sector. The International Monetary Fund is forecasting global trade growth at 3.8% for 2013 and approximately 5% for 2014. Improving industrial production and new goods orders also indicate strengthening economic growth. According to the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, inventories in the United States have now been growing for the last 11 out of 12 quarters, and are almost back to their pre-crisis levels. We expect further rebuilding of inventories this year to levels that will surpass the previous peak. This increase in inventories is driven primarily by the fact that the United States population has grown by 12 million during that same timeframe.

Total net absorption during the fourth quarter was 56 million square feet according to CBRE, Inc., the strongest single quarter since 2006. The availability rate continues to fall (12.8% at December 31, 2012) and supply remains at historically low levels. Further, as the recovery broadens throughout the United States, demand should increase across more of the major tenant business sectors, further reducing vacancy spaces smaller than 100,000 square feet. This segment is closely tied to the recovery in the housing market and we expect demand to increase in the future. Thus, overall conditions in the United States industrial market should continue to improve and as such we are forecasting 150 million square feet of net absorption in 2013.

In Europe, net absorption continues to be positive, and has been, since we began collecting the data series, in the first quarter of 2011. The supply of class-A distribution space remains constrained in both Japan and China. We expect the supply chain reconfiguration in Japan and growing consumption in China to continue to drive demand for our product in the long-term. Demand for class-A facilities remains strong in Latin America. Brazil continues to be an underserved logistics market as growing GDP and increasing consumption is driving high levels of new requirements into the market. Demand momentum has been similarly positive in Mexico, benefitting from the economic recovery in the U.S. and increasingly frequent instances of ‘near-shoring’ of production activities. Net absorption has been positive for several years and market occupancy rates increased 80 basis points to 91.5 percent during 2012 across the six largest markets.

In our total owned and managed operating portfolio, we leased a record 145.3 million square feet of space in 2012. We ended the year with 94.0% occupancy in our owned and managed operating portfolio, up 180 basis points over year end 2011. The effective rental rates on leases signed during the fourth quarter of 2012 in our same store portfolio (as defined below) decreased by 2.4% when compared with the rental

rates on the previous leases on that same space. The decline was primarily attributed to regional markets in Europe where leases were signed at the high point of the prior cycle. Rent change is continuing its upward trend in our portfolio and we expect positive rollover in 2013. Tenant retention in the fourth quarter was 87.3%.

Due to the lack of supply of class-A facilities, high space utilization rates and decreasing vacancy rates, we expect development volume to increase in our markets. Our development business comprises speculative development, build-to-suit development, value-added conversions and redevelopment. We expect to develop directly and within our co-investment structures depending on location, market conditions, submarkets or building sites and availability of capital. In response to this increasing demand, we are actively pursuing various development opportunities, and we commenced development of 40 properties in our owned and managed portfolio during 2012.

Results of Operations

Summary

The following table illustrates the net operating income for each of our segments, along with the reconciling items toLoss from Continuing Operationsin our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

    2012   2011   2010 

Net operating income – Real Estate Operations segment

  $1,347,127    $931,118    $502,072  

Net operating income – Private Capital segment

   62,959     82,657     81,867  

Other:

      

General and administrative expenses

   (228,068)     (195,161)     (165,981)  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

   (80,676)     (140,495)     -  

Impairment of real estate properties

   (252,914)     (21,237)     (736,612)  

Depreciation and amortization

   (739,981)     (552,849)     (294,867)  

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

   31,676     59,935     23,678  

Interest expense

   (507,484)     (468,072)     (461,166)  

Impairment of goodwill and other assets

   (16,135)     (126,432)     (412,745)  

Interest and other income, net

   22,878     12,008     15,847  

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

   305,607     111,684     28,488  

Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net

   (20,497)     41,172     (11,081)  

Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net

   (14,114)     258     (201,486)  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (3,580)     (1,776)     30,499  
  

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

  $(93,202)    $(267,190)    $(1,601,487)  

See Note 22 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information regarding our segments and a reconciliation of net operating income toLoss Before Income Taxes.

Real Estate Operations Segment

The net operating income of the Real Estate OperationsIncluded in this segment consisted ofis rental income and rental expensesexpense recognized from industrial propertiesour consolidated operating properties. We had significant real estate activity during 2014 and 2013 that we own and consolidate and is impacted by our capital deployment activities. This segment excludes amounts presented asDiscontinued Operationsin our Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods. Thethe size and percentage of occupancy of our consolidated portfolio. In addition, the operating fundamentals in the markets of our operating portfolio fluctuates due tohave been improving, which has positively impacted both the timing of acquisitions,occupancy and rental rates we have experienced, and has also fueled development activity and contributions. Such fluctuations affect the net operating income we recognize in this segment in a particular period.activity. Also included in this segment is revenue from land we own and lease to customers under ground leases and development management and other income, offset bynet of acquisition, disposition and land holding costs. The net operating income from the

Real Estate Operations segmentNOI for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in(dollars in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Rental and other income

  $1,879,182    $1,313,708    $717,626    $1,192,176    $1,239,496    $1,469,419  

Rental recoveries

   348,740     331,518     364,320  

Rental and other expenses

   532,055     382,590     215,554     (454,254)     (478,920)     (517,795)  
  

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net operating income - Real Estate Operations segment

  $1,347,127    $931,118    $502,072  

Real Estate Operations - NOI

  $1,086,662    $1,092,094    $1,315,944  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Operating margin

   70.5%     69.5%     71.8%  

Average occupancy

   94.5%     93.6%     92.6%  

The increase in rental income and rental expense in 2012 from 2011 was due primarily to the impactDetail of the Merger and the PEPR Acquisition in the second quarter of 2011, the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions and other acquisitions in 2012 and increased occupancy in our consolidated operating properties (from 91.4% at December 31 2011was as follows (square feet in thousands):

    2014   2013   2012 

Number of properties

   1,607     1,610     1,853  

Square Feet

   282,282     267,097     316,347  

Occupied %

   96.3%     94.9%     93.7%  

Below are the key drivers of Real Estate Operations NOI:

We had significant activity within the portfolio, including acquisitions, contributions to 93.7%co-investment ventures and dispositions to third parties. This impacted NOI as follows:

2014 as compared to 2013

Acquisitions and development activity: $84.8 million increase;

Consolidation of NAIF: $35.8 million increase;

Contribution activity: $140.3 million decrease;

Disposition activity: $44.0 million decrease

2013 as compared to 2012

Acquisitions and development activity: $71.6 million increase;

Contribution activity: $299.4 million decrease

Average occupancy in our operating properties increased 90 basis points in 2014 from 2013 and 100 basis points in 2013 from 2012.

We leased a total of 72.9 million square feet, 87.6 million square feet and 92.4 million square feet during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We recognize changes in rental income from certain contractual rent increases from our existing leases and from rent change on new leases. If a lease has a contractual rent increase based on the consumer price index or similar metric that is not known at December 31, 2012), including the completiontime of lease signing, the rent increase is not included in rent leveling and stabilizationtherefore any rent increase will impact the rental income we recognize.

We have experienced an increase in rental rates on the turnover of new development properties. The resultsexisting leases for 2012 includedthe last eight quarters that has resulted in higher average rental rates in our portfolio and increased rental income and expenses from properties acquired through the Merger and PEPR Acquisition of $834.0 million and $228.9 million, respectively, while 2011 included approximately seven months of rental income and expense of properties acquired through the Merger and PEPR Acquisition of $524.7 million and $142.5 million, respectively. In our consolidated portfolio, we leased 88.5 million square feet in 2012 compared to 63.4 million square feet in 2011.

The increase in net operating income in 2011 over 2010 was due primarily to the impact of the Merger and the PEPR Acquisition in the second quarter of 2011, increased occupancy in our consolidated operating properties (from 85.9% at December 2010 to 91.4% at December 2011) and the completion and stabilization of new development properties.

We calculate the change in effective rental rates onNOI as those leases signed during the quarter as compared to the previous rent on that same space in our same store portfolio (as defined below). During 2012 (over the four quarters), the percentage change in rental rates ranged from a decrease of 3.9% to a decrease of 1.1%. During 2011 (over the four quarters), the percentage change in rental rates ranged from a decrease of 8.9% to a decrease of 4.5%. A decline in rental rates was due to: (i) leases turning that were put in place when market rents were at or near peak and (ii) decreased market rents.commenced.

Under the terms of our lease agreements, we are able to recover the majority of our rental expenses from customers. Rental expense recoveries, included in both rental income and rental expenses, were 74.0%81.0%, 73.7%73.4% and 75.6%74.2% of total rental expenses for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was due in part to the higher average occupancy of our portfolio.

Our consolidated operating properties

We adopted a new accounting standard, as of December 31 were as follows (square feetJanuary 1, 2014, that changed the criteria for classifying and reporting discontinued operations. The results of the third-party dispositions remained in thousands):

    Number of
Properties
   Square Feet   Occupied % 

2012

   1,853     316,347     93.7%  

2011(1)

   1,797     291,051     91.4%  

2010

   985     168,547     85.9%  

(1)The amount at December 31, 2011 included 848 properties with 126.3 million square feet that were acquired through the Merger and PEPR Acquisition.

As discussed earlier, we have 207 operating properties aggregating approximately $5.0 billion that we have contributedcontinuing operations in 2014, whereas in 2013 or expectand 2012, the results were reclassified to contribute to NPRdiscontinued operations and PELP. As a result, we expect to have decreased rental income and rental expensesnot included in 2013Real Estate Operations.

Strategic Capital

Included in this segment. We will account for our continuing ownership in the properties through our equity ownership in the ventures by recognizing our share of the netsegment is income or loss of the ventures. We will also recognize additional revenue in our Private Capital segment from the property management and asset management services we will provide.

Private Capital Segment

The net operating income of the Private Capital segment consistedcomprised of fees and incentivespromotes earned for services performed for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures and certain joint ventures and third parties, reduced by ourthe expenses recognized for the direct costs of managing these entities and the properties they own.

The direct costs associated with our Private Capital segment totaled $63.8 million, $55.0 million and $40.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in the line item Private Capital Expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These expenses include the direct expenses associated with the asset management of the unconsolidated co-investmentthese ventures provided by our employees who are assigned to our Private Capital segment. In addition, in order to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale, all of our property management functions are provided by a team of professionals who are assigned to our Real Estate Operations segment. These individuals perform theallocated property-level management of the properties in our owned and managed portfolio including properties we consolidate and the properties we manage that are owned by the unconsolidated entities. We allocate the costs of our property management function to the properties we consolidate (reported inRental Expenses) andfor the properties owned by the unconsolidated entities (included inPrivateventures. Income associated with Strategic Capital Expenses), by using the square feet owned by the respective portfolios. The increase in Private Capital Expenses in 2012 isfluctuates due to the increased private capital platform and infrastructuresize of co-investment ventures that was part ofare under management, the Merger, offset partially with a declinetransactional activity in the portion of our property management expenses that are allocated to this segment due to the consolidation of PEPR in June 2011venture and the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitionstiming of promotes. We had significant co-investment venture activity in 2012.2014 and 2013 that impacted Strategic Capital NOI as detailed below.

The net operating income from the PrivateStrategic Capital segment, representing fees earned reduced by private capital expenses,NOI for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Unconsolidated entities:

      

Americas (1)

  $31,637    $42,644    $40,354  

Europe (2)

   21,699     30,708     41,200  

Asia (3)

   9,623     9,305     313  
  

 

 

 

Total net operating income - Private Capital segment

  $62,959    $82,657    $81,867  
    2014   2013   2012 

Strategic Capital - NOI:

      

Americas:

      

Asset management and other fees

  $51,490    $52,030    $55,448  

Leasing commissions, acquisition and other transaction fees

   12,348     14,078     13,974  

Promotes

   31,330     6,366       

Strategic capital expenses

   (53,126)     (53,689)     (37,785)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Americas

   42,042     18,785     31,637  

Europe:

      

Asset management and other fees

   70,539     53,190     32,951  

Leasing commissions, acquisition and other transaction fees

   16,010     10,604     4,096  

Strategic capital expenses

   (29,283)     (22,531)     (15,348)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Europe

   57,266     41,263     21,699  

Asia:

      

Asset management and other fees

   32,252     29,861     19,026  

Leasing commissions, acquisition and other transaction fees

   5,902     13,343     1,284  

Strategic capital expenses

   (14,087)     (13,059)     (10,687)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Asia

   24,067     30,145     9,623  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Strategic Capital - NOI

  $123,375    $90,193    $62,959  

We had the following assets under management held through our unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31 as follows (dollars and square feet in millions):

    2014   2013   2012 

Americas:

      

Number of ventures

   3     4     6  

Square feet

   87.1     108.5     127.5  

Total assets

  $7,063    $8,014    $9,070  

Europe:

      

Number of ventures

   4     4     3  

Square feet

   147.4     132.9     70.3  

Total assets

  $11,463    $11,819    $6,605  

Asia:

      

Number of ventures

   2     2     2  

Square feet

   26.2     22.9     11.0  

Total assets

  $4,135    $4,032    $1,937  

Total:

      

Number of ventures

   9     10     11  

Square feet

   260.7     264.3     208.8  

Total assets

  $        22,661    $        23,865    $        17,612  

Below are the key drivers of Strategic Capital NOI:

We acquired a controlling interest in our co-investment venture NAIF in the fourth quarter of 2014 and began consolidating the venture.

We formed the co-investment venture FIBRA Prologis in Mexico in June 2014 and in connection with this transaction, we concluded the Mexico Industrial Fund.

We acquired a controlling interest in Prologis SGP Mexico and purchased our partner’s interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund III in 2013.

We formed two co-investment ventures in early 2013 (one in Europe and one in Japan). In connection with the formation of the Japan co-investment venture, we concluded Japan Fund I.

We contributed 126, 254 and 25 properties to several co-investment ventures during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

(1)Represents

In June 2014, we earned a promote of $42.1 million from our co-investment venture USLF. Of that amount, $31.3 million represented the fees earned by us from several unconsolidated entities. The decreasethird-party investors’ portion and is reflected in net operating income in 2012 is due to the successful conclusion of four co-investment venturesStrategic Capital Income in the United States during the year. AsConsolidated Statements of December 31, 2012, we had six co-investment ventures (three in the United States, two in Mexico and one in Brazil). In 2011, the net operating income increased as a result of three new ventures acquired as part of the Merger, offset with a decrease due to the sale of properties in three ventures. In 2010, we had ten co-investment ventures and sold our interests in three of these ventures in December 2010.

Operations.

(2)Represents the fees earned by us from several unconsolidated entities. In 2012, we had three co-investment ventures. In 2011, we had one co-investment venture during the entire year, we included PEPR up to the date we began consolidating at the end of May 2011, and added two co-investment ventures acquired through the Merger. In 2010 we had two co-investment ventures.

(3)Represents the fees earned by us from several unconsolidated entities. In 2012, we had two co-investment ventures. In 2011, we acquired an investment in an unconsolidated co-investment venture in each of Japan and China in connection with the Merger, and sold our investment in the South Korea co-investment venture during the third quarter. In 2010, we only had one co-investment venture, which was in South Korea.

We expectThe direct costs associated with Strategic Capital totaled $96.5 million, $89.3 million and $63.8 million for the net operating incomeyears ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are included in the line itemStrategic Capital Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of this segmentOperations. These expenses include the direct expenses associated with asset management of the unconsolidated co-investment ventures and the property management expenses associated with the property-level management of the properties owned by these ventures.

The increase inStrategic Capital Expensesin 2014 from 2013 was due to the increased size of our co-investment ventures and additional expense that represents the associated bonus paid pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan for the promote we earned, offset partially by the conclusion of several ventures. The increase inStrategic Capital Expenses in 2013 from 2012 was due to NPR and PELP and from the contributionsaddition of properties to existingthe two co-investment ventures in Europe and Asia and additional expense related to the promote we earned, offset slightlysomewhat by the decrease in revenue from some other co-investment ventures as they are concluded.conclusion of several ventures.

See Note 65 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information on our unconsolidated entities.

Our Owned and Managed Portfolio

We manage our business on an owned and managed basis without regard to whether a particular property is wholly-owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures. As further discussed below, we believe that the operating fundamentals of our owned and managed portfolio are consistent with those of our consolidated portfolio. The activity in our owned and managed portfolio impacts Real Estate Operations NOI, Strategic Capital revenues and the net earnings we recognize from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.

Our total owned and managed portfolio includes operating industrial properties and does not include properties under development or held for sale and was as follows at December 31 (square feet in millions):

   2014   2013   2012 
    Number of
Properties
   

Square

Feet

   Occupancy   Number of
Properties
   

Square

Feet

   Occupancy   Number of
Properties
   

Square

Feet

   Occupancy 

Consolidated

   1,607     282.3     96.3%     1,610     267.1     94.9%     1,853     316.3     93.7%  

Unconsolidated

   1,278     260.7     95.0%     1,323     264.3     94.7%     1,163     208.8     93.8%  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

   2,885     543.0     95.6%     2,933     531.4     94.8%     3,016     525.1     93.8%  

Operating Activity

Information on our operating activity for the years ended December 31 is summarized below (square feet in millions):

    2014   2013   2012 

Aggregate leased square feet

   130.3     151.9     145.3  

Average turnover costs per square foot

  $1.46    $1.42    $1.38  

Rent change on rollover (range of each quarter during the year)

   6.2 - 9.7%     2.0 - 6.1%     (1.1) - (3.9)%  

Retention percentage on aggregate leased square feet

   85.5%     82.6%     87.3%  

Development Start Activity

Information on our development starts for the years ended December 31 is summarized below (dollars and square feet in millions):

    2014 (1)   2013   2012 

Number of properties

   76     68     40  

Aggregated square feet

   26.0     23.0     17.0  

Total expected investment (“TEI”)

  $2,034    $1,771    $1,553  

Our proportionate share of TEI based on ownership

  $1,792    $1,473    $1,359  

Percentage of build-to-suits based on TEI

   32.6%     41.8%     63.8%  

Weighted average expected yield on TEI

   7.2%     7.6%     7.9%  

Estimated value at completion

  $2,441    $2,109    $1,834  

Estimated margin

   20.0%     19.1%     18.1%  

(1)We expect these developments to be completed on or before July 2016.

For information on our development portfolio at December 31, 2014, see Item 2. Properties.

Same Store Analysis

We evaluate the performance of the operating properties we own and manage using a “same store” analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, as well as properties owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures that are managed by us, in our same store analysis. We have defined the same store portfolio, for the three months ended December 31, 2014, as those properties that were in operation at January 1, 2013, and have been in operation throughout the same three-month periods in both 2014 and 2013. We have removed all properties that were disposed of to a third party or were classified as held for sale from the population for both periods. We believe the factors that impact rental income, rental expenses and NOI in the same store portfolio are generally the same as for the total portfolio. In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, we remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the current exchange rate to translate from local currency into U.S. dollars, for both periods.

We calculate our same store results on a quarterly basis and provide a reconciliation of those results to our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following is a summary of same store NOI and the change from prior period for the four quarters of 2014 and on a cumulative year-to-date basis and the square feet of the portfolio used in the calculation (dollars and square feet in thousands):

   Three Months Ended     
   March 31 (1)   June 30 (1)   September 30 (1)   December 31   Full Year 

2014 NOI - same store portfolio

  $586,579    $584,422    $581,912    $568,742    $2,321,655  

2013 NOI - same store portfolio

  $569,596    $562,899    $561,270    $546,214    $2,239,979  

Percentage change

   2.98%     3.82%     3.68%     4.12%     3.65%  

Square feet of portfolio

   505.6     496.9     490.6     487.2       

(1)A reconciliation of our same store results for these fiscal quarters to our Consolidated Statements of Operations is provided in our previously filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective quarter.

The following is a reconciliation of our consolidated rental income, rental expenses and NOI (calculated as rental income and recoveries less rental expenses) for the full year, as included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, to the respective amounts in our same store portfolio analysis for the three months ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

  Three Months Ended     
  March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31   Full Year 
 

 

 

 

2014

         

Rental income and rental recoveries

 $388,240    $381,273    $355,822    $402,014    $  1,527,349  

Rental expenses

  110,517     109,576     102,324     108,370     430,787  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOI

 $277,723    $  271,697    $253,498    $293,644    $1,096,562  
 

 

 

 

2013

         

Rental income and rental recoveries

 $444,144    $363,956    $372,185    $379,208    $1,559,493  

Rental expenses

  130,354     109,837     106,811     104,936     451,938  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOI

 $313,790    $254,119    $265,374    $274,272    $1,107,555  

   For the Three Months Ended December 31, 
        2014           2013           Percentage    
Change
 

Rental Income (1)(2)

      

Consolidated:

      

Rental income per the Consolidated Statements of Operations

  $307,584    $301,627    

Rental recoveries per the Consolidated Statements of Operations

   94,430     77,581    

Consolidated adjustments to derive same store results:

      

Rental income and recoveries of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

   (45,387)     (41,562)    

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

   112     (4,467)    

Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – rental income

   412,873     402,185    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Same store portfolio – rental income (2)

  $769,612    $735,364     4.7%  

Rental Expenses (1)(3)

      

Consolidated:

      

Rental expenses per the Consolidated Statements of Operations

  $108,370    $104,936    

Consolidated adjustments to derive same store results:

      

Rental expenses of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

   (13,699)     (12,996)    

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

   10,139     3,830    

Unconsolidated co-investment ventures — rental expenses

   96,060     93,380    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Same store portfolio – rental expenses (3)

  $200,870    $189,150     6.2%  

NOI (1)

      

Consolidated:

      

NOI per the Consolidated Statements of Operations

  $293,644    $274,272    

Consolidated adjustments to derive same store results:

      

NOI of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

   (31,688)     (28,566)    

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

   (10,027)     (8,297)    

Unconsolidated co-investment ventures — NOI

   316,813     308,805    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Same store portfolio – NOI

  $568,742    $546,214     4.1%  

(1)

As discussed above, our same store portfolio includes industrial properties from our consolidated portfolio and owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures that are managed by us. During the periods presented, certain properties owned by us were

contributed to a co-investment venture and are included in the same store portfolio on an aggregate basis. Neither our consolidated results nor those of the co-investment ventures, when viewed individually, would be comparable on a same store basis due to the changes in composition of the respective portfolios from period to period (for example, the results of a contributed property are included in our consolidated results through the contribution date and in the results of the unconsolidated entities subsequent to the contribution date).

(2)We exclude the net termination and renegotiation fees from our same store rental income to allow us to evaluate the growth or decline in each property’s rental income without regard to items that are not indicative of the property’s recurring operating performance. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by the write-off of the asset recorded due to the adjustment to straight-line rents over the lease term. The adjustments to remove these items are included in “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in the above table.

(3)Rental expenses include the direct operating expenses of the property such as property taxes, insurance, utilities, etc. In addition, we include an allocation of the property management expenses for our direct-owned properties based on the property management services provided to each property (generally, based on a percentage of revenues). On consolidation, these amounts are eliminated and the actual costs of providing property management services are recognized as part of our consolidated rental expenses. These expenses fluctuate based on the level of properties included in the same store portfolio and any adjustment is included as “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in the above table.

Other Components of Income

General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expenses

G&A expenses for the years ended December 31 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Gross G&A expense

  $394,845    $332,632    $266,932  

Reported as rental expenses

   (35,954)     (24,741)     (19,709)  

Reported as private capital expenses

   (63,820)     (54,962)     (40,659)  

Capitalized amounts

   (67,003)     (57,768)     (40,583)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net G&A

  $228,068    $195,161    $165,981  
    2014   2013   2012 

Gross overhead

  $  461,647    $  434,933    $  394,845  

Reported as rental expenses

   (30,075)     (32,918)     (35,954)  

Reported as strategic capital expenses

   (96,496)     (89,278)     (63,820)  

Capitalized amounts

   (87,308)     (83,530)     (67,003)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

G&A expenses

  $  247,768    $  229,207    $  228,068  

Gross overhead includes all costs related to our business, including the Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital segments. We allocate a portion of our gross overhead that relates to property management functions to both segments based on the size of the respective portfolios. Costs directly associated to Strategic Capital are allocated to that segment.

The increase in G&A expenses and the various componentsgross overhead from 20112013 to 2012 and from 20102014 was principally due to 2011 was due principally to the larger infrastructure associated with the combined company following the Merger and the PEPR Acquisition.increased compensation. The increase in capitalized G&A isgross overhead from 2012 to 2013 was primarily due to increased infrastructure to accommodate our growing business. In 2013, the gross book value for our owned and managed portfolio increased development and leasing activities since the Merger.$1.4 billion to $45.5 billion at December 31, 2013.

We capitalize certain costs directly related to our development and leasing activities. Capitalized G&A expenses included salaries and related costs, as well as other general and administrative costs. The capitalized G&A costs for the years ended December 31 waswere as follows (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Development activities

  $42,417    $34,301    $14,612    $  68,008    $  64,113    $  42,417  

Leasing activities

   23,183     21,390     24,775     17,888     18,301     23,183  

Costs related to internally developed software

   1,403     2,077     1,196     1,412     1,116     1,403  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total capitalized G&A expenses

  $67,003    $57,768    $40,583    $  87,308    $  83,530    $  67,003  

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011In 2014, 2013 and 2010,2012, the capitalized salaries and related costs represented 19.1%23.9%, 19.3%23.7% and 16.1%20.3%, respectively, of our total capitalizable salaries and related costs. In addition, in 2012, we capitalized $1.2 million of salaries and related costs, related to internally developed software that were included asMerger, Acquisitionwhich includes cash and Other Integration Expenses. Salaries and related costs are comprised primarily of wages, otherequity compensation and other employee-related expenses. In

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $642.5 million, $648.7 million and $724.3 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, we began consolidatedrespectively. The decrease over the last two years was principally a result of the disposition and contribution of properties, offset slightly by additional depreciation and amortization from completed development projects with a total expected investment of $1.3 billion ($0.6 billion in the fourth quarter) as compared to $0.8 billion in 2011. As discussed earlier, we expect our development activity to continue to increase in 2013.and acquired properties.

Merger, Acquisition and Other Integration Expenses

In connection with the Merger and other related activities, weWe incurred significant transaction, integration and transitional costs in 2012 related to the Merger in 2011 and integration of $80.7 million and $140.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe the majority of these costs have been realized as of December 31, 2012 and any additional costs incurred in 2013 will be included inG&A Expenses.systems. See Note 1514 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more detail on these expenses.

Impairment of Real Estate Properties

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recognized impairment charges of real estate properties in continuing operations of $252.9 million, $21.2 million and $736.6 million, respectively, due to our change of intent to no longer hold thesecertain assets for long-term investment. In 2012, these impairment charges relatedSee Notes 2 and 15 to our planned contribution of properties to PELP ($135.3 million), land parcels that we expected to sell to third parties ($88.9 million) and operating buildings we expected to contribute or sell ($28.7 million). In 2010, the charges primarily included land as a result of our change in strategy. Changes in economic and operating conditions and our ultimate intent with regard to our

investments in real estate that occur in the future may result in additional impairment charges or gains at the time of sale. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more detail on the process we took to value these assets and the related impairment charges recognized.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $740.0 million, $552.8 million and $294.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase from 2011 to 2012 is due to additional depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the assets (including intangible assets) acquired in the Merger and PEPR Acquisition during the second quarter of 2011 and the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions in 2012, as well as completed and leased development properties and additional leasing and capital improvements in our operating properties. The increase from 2010 to 2011 is primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the properties acquired through the Merger and PEPR Acquisition, completed and leased development properties and increased leasing activity.

Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net

We recognized net earnings of $31.7 million, $59.9 million and $23.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These earnings relate to our investment infrom unconsolidated entities that are accounted for on the equity method. The earnings decreased in 2012 from 2011 due to the consolidation of PEPR and the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions, as such ventures were previously accounted for under the equity method. This decrease was partially offset by earnings from investments acquired through the Merger. In 2012, we recorded a lossmethod of $9.3$134.3 million, $97.2 million and $31.7 million for our share of a loss on the early extinguishment of debt in Prologis North American Industrial Fund III. The primary reason for the increase in 2011 over 2010 is due to the investments we acquired through the Merger, partially offset by the consolidation of PEPR.2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The earnings we recognize are impacted by: (i) varianceschanges in revenues and expenses of the entity;each venture; (ii) the size and occupancy rate of the portfolio of properties owned by the entity;each venture; (iii) our ownership interest in the entity;each venture; and (iv) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate our share of net earnings to U.S. dollars, if applicable. We manageSee the majority of the properties in which we have an ownership interest as part of our total owned and managed portfolio. See discussion of our portfolio resultsco-investment ventures above in the section, “Portfolio Information”. See alsoStrategic Capital segment discussion and in Note 65 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a further breakdown of our share of net earnings recognized.

We expect increases in earnings from unconsolidated entities in 2013 due to our share of net earnings from NPR and PELP that we expect to recognize after contributions made in 2013.

Interest Expense

InterestGross interest expense decreased in 2014, compared to 2013, due to lower average debt levels and a decrease in interest rates. Although our debt levels were consistent at year ends ($9.4 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $9.0 billion at December 31, 2013), we had higher debt outstanding during the first quarter of 2013. We decreased our debt by $2.7 billion near the end of the first quarter of 2013, primarily from continuing operations included the following components (in thousands) forproceeds received from the years ended December 31:contributions made to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.

    2012   2011   2010 

Gross interest expense

  $580,787    $500,019    $435,289  

Amortization of discount (premium), net

   (36,687)     228     47,136  

Amortization of deferred loan costs

   16,781     20,476     32,402  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense before capitalization

   560,881     520,723     514,827  

Capitalized amounts

   (53,397)     (52,651)     (53,661)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest expense

  $507,484    $468,072    $461,166  

Gross interest expense increaseddecreased in 2013 compared to 2012 and 2011 from the previous year primarily due to higherlower debt levels as a result of the Merger, the PEPR Acquisitionlevels.

Our weighted average effective interest rate was 4.2%, 4.7% and the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions in4.6% for 2014, 2013 and 2012, partially offset byrespectively. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we issued new debt with lower effective borrowing costs and replacement of debt at lower rates.

Although our strategic objective is to reduce our debt and leverage withused the proceeds from property dispositions, we temporarily increased our debt in 2012 by $1.4 billion from the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions. We plan to pay down debt with the proceeds from the contribution of properties in early 2013 and disposition of properties in 2013. As a result of the Merger and PEPR Acquisition, we added approximately $5.9 billion of debt at fair value at the beginning of June 2011 and approximately seven months of related interest expense in 2011, which increasedor buy back our debt balance as of December 31, 2011 to $11.4 billion. higher cost debt.

See Note 109 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements for a further breakdown of gross interest expense, amortization and capitalized amounts included in Item 8 andnet interest expense.

See also Liquidity and Capital Resources for further discussion of our debt and borrowing costs.

Our weighted average effective borrowing cost was 4.6%, 5.6% and 6.5% for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our future interest expense, both gross interest and the portion capitalized, will vary depending on, among other things, our effective borrowing rate and the level of our development activities.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Assets

Based on our review of goodwill in 2010, we recognized an impairment charge of $368.5 million related to goodwill allocated to the Real Estate Operations segment in the Americas and Europe reporting units. The review of goodwill was triggered by the strategic decision we made in the fourth quarter of 2010 to significantly downsize our development platform and, as a result, to sell to third parties certain other assets, some of which were acquired in the acquisitions that originally created the goodwill.

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $16.1 million, $126.4 million and $44.3 million, respectively, on certain of our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities, notes receivable and other assets, as we did not believe these amounts to be recoverable based on the present value of the estimated future cash flows associated with these assets, including estimated sales proceeds, or we believed the decline in fair value to be other than temporary.

See Notes 2 and 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on our process with regard to analyzing the recoverability of goodwill and other assets.

Gains on Acquisitions and Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net

In 2012, weWe recognized net gains on acquisitions$0.7 billion, $0.6 billion and dispositions of investments in real estate$0.3 billion in continuing operations of $305.6 million, whichduring 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2014, these also included $294.2 million of gains related to the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions and $11.4 million of gains principally related to contribution activity. We received proceeds of $381.9 million from the contribution of 25 properties aggregating 4.8 million square feet.

During 2011, we recognized net gains on acquisitions andthe dispositions of investments in real estate in continuing operations of $111.7 million. This included gains recognized in the second quarter related to the PEPR Acquisition ($85.9 million) and the acquisition of our partner’s interest in one of our other unconsolidated joint ventures in Japan ($13.5 million). The gains represent the adjustment to fair value of our equity investments at the time we gained control and consolidated the entities. The contribution activity in 2011 resulted in cash proceeds of $590.8 million and net gains of $12.3 million.

During 2010, we recognized net gains on dispositions of investments in real estate in continuing operations of $28.5 million, which related to the contribution of land and operating properties to unconsolidated entities ($58.3 million gain), additional proceeds from contributions we made to PEPF II in 2009 based on valuations received as of December 31, 2010 and our contribution agreement with the venture ($27.4 million gain) and the sale of land parcels to third parties ($7.4 million gain), offset by a loss of $64.6 million relateddue to the salechange in reporting under the new accounting standard. We expect to have contributions to co-investments in the future, primarily in Europe, Japan and Mexico, as well as the disposition of certain unconsolidated entities.

The 2010 contribution activity resultedproperties to third parties, primarily in cash proceeds of $469.7 million relatedthe U.S., all depending on market conditions and other factors. See Note 4 to the contribution of development properties aggregating 2.1 million square feet and land to unconsolidated entities, andConsolidated Financial Statements for further information on the sale of 90% of two development properties in Japan aggregating 1.3 million square feet. We continue to own 10% of the Japan properties, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, andgains we continue to manage the properties.

If we realize a gain on contribution or sale of a property to an unconsolidated entity, we recognize the portion attributable to the third party ownership in the entity. If we realize a loss on contribution, we recognize the full amount as soon as it is known. Due to our continuing involvement through our ownership in the unconsolidated entity, these dispositions are not included in discontinued operations.recognized.

Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net

WeTo mitigate our foreign currency exchange exposure, we borrow in the functional currency of the borrowing entity when appropriate. However, we and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries may have intercompany or third partythird-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss may result. To mitigate our foreign currency exchange exposure, we borrow in the functional currency of the borrowing entity when appropriate. Certain of our third-party and intercompany debt is remeasured with the resulting adjustment recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment inForeign Currency Translation Loss,Losses, Net in ourthe Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). This treatment is applicable to third-party debt that is designated as a hedge of our net investment and intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature.

If the third-party debt is not designated as a hedge or the intercompany debt is deemed short-term in nature when the debt is remeasured, we recognize a gain or loss in earnings.earnings when the debt is remeasured. We recognized net foreign currency exchange losses of $4.5 million in 2014 and exchange gains of $9.2 million and $7.4 million in 2012,2013 and losses of $5.9 million and $11.5 million in 2011 and 2010,2012, respectively, related to the settlement and remeasurement of debt. Predominantly the gains or losses recognized in earnings relate to the remeasurement of intercompany loans between the United States parent and certain consolidated subsidiaries in Japan and Europe and result from fluctuations in the exchange rates of U.S. dollar to the euro, Japanese yen and British pound sterling. In addition, we recognized net foreign currency exchange losses of $5.6$0.6 million, $0.6 million and gains of $2.1 million and $0.4$5.6 million from the settlement of transactions with third parties during December 31,of certain assets or liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency in 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

We recognized an unrealized losslosses of $13.3 million, $42.2 million and $22.3 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, and an unrealized gain of $45.0 million in 2011respectively on the derivative instrument (exchange feature) related to our exchangeable senior notes, which became exchangeable at the time of the Merger.are due in March 2015.

Gains (Losses) on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net

During the years ended December 31,2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, we purchased portions of several series of senior notes, senior exchangeable notes and Eurobonds outstanding and extinguished some secured mortgage debt prior to maturity, which resulted in the recognition of losses of $165.3 million, $277.0 million and $14.1 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, gains of $0.3 million in 2011, and losses of $201.5 million in 2010. The gains or losses represent the difference between the recorded debt (net of premiums and discounts and including related debt issuance costs) and the consideration we paid to retire the debt, including fees. Included in this amount in 2012 are losses that were included inOther Comprehensive Income (Loss) in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to hedge transactions and were deemed unrecoverable in the fourth quarter of 2012. These hedges were associated with debt that is expected to be repaid before maturity in Europe with the proceeds from the contributions to PELP in early 2013.respectively. See Note 109 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information regarding our debt repurchases.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

During the years ended December 31,2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, our current income tax expense was $17.9$61.6 million, $21.6$126.2 million and $21.7$17.9 million, respectively. We recognize current income tax expense for income taxes incurred by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”), state and local income taxes and taxes incurred in certainour foreign jurisdictions, as well as certain state taxes. We also include in current income tax expense the interest associated with our liability for uncertain tax positions.jurisdictions. Our current income tax expense fluctuates from period to period based primarily on the timing of our taxable income. Current income tax expense recognized during 2014 is principally due to tax triggered upon the contribution of the initial portfolio of properties by certain wholly-owned entities and changesMexico Fondo Logistico (“AFORES”) to FIBRA Prologis, as the transaction was structured as an asset sale for Mexican tax purposes. The tax expense was offset slightly by the net current tax benefit from the operating losses generated by our United States TRS. The current tax expense recognized during 2013 was due to the initial contribution of certain properties to PELP and NPR that were previously held in taxforeign jurisdictions and interest rates.United States TRSs.

InDuring 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recognized a net deferred tax benefit of $14.3$87.2 million, $19.8$19.4 million and $52.2$14.3 million, respectively. Deferred income tax expensebenefit (expense) is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences and the utilization of net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets in certain of our taxable subsidiaries operating in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. TheDuring 2014, the majority of the deferred tax benefit recorded during 2010 is primarily due to impairment charges recorded to the book basiswe recognized was a result of real estate properties and investments in unconsolidated entities, net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards recorded for certain jurisdictions, and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities related to built-in-gains. In addition, duringof $62.8 million as part of the second quarter of 2010, we recognized a deferredFIBRA Prologis transaction ($30.4 million was offset by current income tax benefit of approximately $27.5expense) and $27.1 million resulting from the conversion of two of our European management companies to taxable entities. This conversion was approved by the applicable tax authorities in June 2010 and created an asset for tax purposes that will be utilized against future taxable income as it is amortized. The deferred tax benefit was partially offset by an increasedue to the valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions because we could not sustain a conclusion that it was more likely than not that we could realizeexpiration of the deferred tax assets and NOL carryforwards.holding period on properties previously acquired with existing built-in gains.

Our income taxes are discussed in more detail in Note 1716 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.Statements.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations representAs discussed above, we adopted a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. The results of operations that have been classified asnew accounting standard regarding discontinued operations are reported separatelyeffective January 1, 2014, and none of our property dispositions in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we disposed of land subject to ground leases and 200, 94 and 205 operating properties, respectively, to third parties that2014 met the requirementscriteria to be classified as discontinued operations. We recognized aggregate net gains on these transactions, net of impairment charges, of $35.1 million, $58.6In 2014, 2013 and 2012, earnings from discontinued operations were $123.5 million and $234.6$75.9 million, during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. TheDiscontinued operations under the previous standard represent the results of operations of these properties for 2012, 2011that were sold to third parties along with the related gain or loss on sale.

Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

This amount represents the third-party investors’ share of the earnings generated in consolidated ventures in which we do not own 100% of the equity, as well as the limited partners’ interests in the Operating Partnership. In 2014, we recognized net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests in AFORES of $64.8 million due to the FIBRA Prologis transaction, primarily related to the third-party investors’ share of the gain on disposition and 2010 were $27.6the net deferred income tax benefit.

In 2013, we earned a promote of $18.8 million $50.6from the cumulative returns of the investors of our consolidated co-investment venture, Prologis Institutional Alliance Fund II, over the life of the venture. Of that amount, $13.5 million represents the third-party investors’ portion and $96.5 million, respectively.is reflected as a component of noncontrolling interest.

See Notes 4 and 9Note 12 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.for further information on our consolidated co-investment ventures.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Foreign Currency Translation Losses, Net

ForWe recognized unrealized gains or losses related to the translation of our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is notforeign subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars, along with realized and unrealized gains or losses associated with the changes in the fair value of derivative and non-derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. During 2014, we recorded net losses of $171.4 million principally due to the weakening of the Japanese yen, euro and British pound sterling to the U.S. dollar, we translate their financial statements into U.S. dollars at the time we consolidate those subsidiaries’ financial statements. Generally, assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments, due to the fluctuations in exchange rates from the beginning of the period to the end of the period. In 2013, we recorded net losses of $234.7 million, which included approximately $190 million of foreign currency translation losses on the properties contributed to PELP and NPR due to the weakening of the euro and Japanese yen, respectively, to the U.S. dollar from December 31, 2012, through the date of the contributions. Also in 2013, we recorded net unrealized losses due to the weakening of the Japanese yen to the U.S. dollar, from the beginning of the period are included inForeign Currency Translation Losses, Net in ourConsolidated Statementsto the end of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

the period. During 2012, we recorded unrealized net losses of $79.0 million as the Japanese yen rates weakened relative to the U.S. dollar, by 10.1% from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, offset slightly by the euro and British pound sterling slightly strengthening against the U.S. dollar, during the same period. During 2011, we recorded unrealized net losses of $192.6 million as the euro and British pound sterling remained relatively flat from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, but both weakened to the U.S. dollar from the Merger and PEPR Acquisition date to December 31, 2011. These losses were offset slightly by the strengthening of the Japanese yen to the U.S. dollar during 2011. During 2010, we recognized unrealized net losses of $45.2 million mainly as a result of the weakening of the euro and British pound sterling to the U.S. dollar, offset by the Japanese yen strengthening against the U.S. dollar, from the beginning of the yearperiod to December 31, 2010.

Portfolio Information

Our total owned and managed properties includes operating industrial properties but not properties under development, properties held for sale or non-industrial properties and was as follows as of December 31 (square feet in thousands):

  2012   2011   2010 
   Number of
Properties
  Square Feet   Number of
Properties
  Square Feet   Number of
Properties
  Square Feet 

Consolidated

  1,853    316,347     1,797    291,051     985    168,547  

Unconsolidated

  1,163    208,753     1,403    267,752     1,179    255,367  
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Totals

  3,016    525,100     3,200    558,803     2,164    423,914  

Same Store Analysis

We evaluate the performanceend of the operating properties we own and manage using a “same store” analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changesperiod. See Note 18 in the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, and properties owned by the co-investment ventures (accountedConsolidated Financial Statements for on the equity method) that are managed by us (referred to as “unconsolidated entities”), including those owned and managed by AMB prior to the Merger, in our same store analysis. We have defined the same store portfolio, for the three months ended December 31, 2012, as those properties that were in operation at January 1, 2011 and have been in operation throughout the same three-month periods in both 2012 and 2011. We have removed all properties that were disposed of to a third party or were classified as held for sale from the population for both periods. We believe the factors that impact rental income, rental expenses and net operating income in the same store portfolio are generally the same as for the total portfolio. In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, we remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the current exchange rate to translate from local currency into U.S. dollars, for both periods. The same store portfolio, for the three months ended December 31, 2012, included 502.0 million of aggregated square feet.further detail.

The following is a reconciliation of our consolidated rental income, rental expenses and net operating income (calculated as rental income and recoveries less rental expenses) for the full year, as included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in Item 8, to the respective amounts in our same store portfolio analysis (dollars in thousands).

  Three Months Ended    
  March 31  June 30  September 30  December 31  Full Year 

2012

     

Rental income and recoveries

 $445,405   $470,388   $471,688   $481,743   $1,869,224  

Rental expenses

  119,278    126,746    127,779    131,696    505,499  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income

 $326,127   $343,642   $343,909   $350,047   $1,363,725  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2011

     

Rental income and recoveries

 $187,931   $268,429   $423,286   $415,226   $1,294,872  

Rental expenses

  57,680    73,667    117,043    110,169    358,559  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income

 $130,251   $194,762   $306,243   $305,057   $936,313  

  For the Three Months Ended December 31, 
   2012  2011  Percentage
Change
 

Rental Income (1)(2)

   

Consolidated:

   

Rental income per our Consolidated Statements of Operations

 $387,299   $332,721   

Rental recoveries per our Consolidated Statements of Operations

  94,444    82,505   

Adjustments to derive same store results:

   

Rental income and recoveries of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

  (31,849)    (16,711)   

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

  (227)    (7,748)   

Unconsolidated entities:

   

Rental income of properties managed by us and owned by our unconsolidated entities

  318,070    363,190   
 

 

 

  

Same store portfolio – rental income (2)(3)

 $767,737   $753,957    1.8%  

Rental Expenses (1)(4)

   

Consolidated:

   

Rental expenses per our Consolidated Statements of Operations

 $131,696   $110,169   

Adjustments to derive same store results:

   

Rental expenses of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

  (8,246)    (8,287)   

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

  1,302    579   

Unconsolidated entities:

   

Rental expenses of properties managed by us and owned by our unconsolidated entities

  83,927    93,018   
 

 

 

 

Adjusted same store portfolio – rental expenses (3)(4)

 $208,679   $195,479    6.8%  

Net Operating Income (1)

   

Consolidated:

   

Net operating income per our Consolidated Statements of Operations

 $350,047   $305,057   

Adjustments to derive same store results:

   

Net operating income of properties not in the same store portfolio — properties developed and acquired during the period and land subject to ground leases

  (23,603)    (8,424)   

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other

  (1,529)    (8,327)   

Unconsolidated entities:

   

Net operating income of properties managed by us and owned by our unconsolidated entities

  234,143    270,172   
 

 

 

  

Adjusted same store portfolio – net operating income (3)

 $559,058   $558,478    0.1%  

(1)As discussed above, our same store portfolio includes industrial properties from our consolidated portfolio and owned by the unconsolidated entities (accounted for on the equity method) that are managed by us. During the periods presented, certain properties owned by us were contributed to a co-investment venture and are included in the same store portfolio on an aggregate basis. Neither our consolidated results nor those of the unconsolidated entities, when viewed individually, would be comparable on a same store basis due to the changes in composition of the respective portfolios from period to period (for example, the results of a contributed property are included in our consolidated results through the contribution date and in the results of the unconsolidated entities subsequent to the contribution date).

(2)We exclude the net termination and renegotiation fees from our same store rental income to allow us to evaluate the growth or decline in each property’s rental income without regard to items that are not indicative of the property’s recurring operating performance. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by the write-off of the asset recognized due to the adjustment to straight-line rents over the lease term. The adjustments to remove these items are included as “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in the tables above.

(3)These amounts include activity of both our consolidated industrial properties and those owned by our unconsolidated entities (accounted for on the equity method) and managed by us.

(4)

Rental expenses in the same store portfolio include the direct operating expenses of the property such as property taxes, insurance, utilities, etc. In addition, we include an allocation of the property management expenses for our direct-owned properties based on the property management fee that is provided for in the individual management agreements under which our wholly owned management companies provide property management services to each property (generally, the fee is based on a percentage of revenues). On consolidation, the management fee income earned by the management companies and the management fee expense recognized by the

properties are eliminated and the actual costs of providing property management services are recognized as part of our consolidated rental expenses. These expenses fluctuate based on the level of properties included in the same store portfolio and any adjustment is included as “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in the above table.

Environmental Matters

A majority of the properties acquired by us were subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments have revealed an environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We record a liabilitySee Note 19 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the estimated costs offurther information about environmental remediation to be incurred in connection with certain operating properties we acquire, as well as certain land parcels we acquire in connection with the planned development of the land. The liability is established to cover the environmental remediation costs, including cleanup costs, consulting fees for studies and investigations, monitoring costs and legal costs relating to cleanup, litigation defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. We purchase various environmental insurance policies to mitigate our exposure to environmental liabilities. We are not aware of any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

We consider our ability to generate cash from operating activities, dispositions of properties and from available financing sources to be adequate to meet our anticipated future development, acquisition, operating, debt service, dividend and distribution requirements.

Near-Term Principal Cash Sources and Uses

In addition to dividends to the common and preferred stockholders of Prologis Inc. and distributions to the holders of limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership and other partnerships, we expect our primary cash needs will consist of the following:

 

repayment of debt, including payments on our credit facilities and scheduled principal payments in 20132015 of $599 million (which includes $460 million due March 15, 2015, on exchangeable/convertible notes that are exchangeable/convertible at a rate of 25.8244 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an exchange or conversion price of $38.72));

completion of the development and leasing of the properties in our consolidated development portfolio (we had 79 properties at December 31, 2014, in our development portfolio that were 46.7% leased with a current investment of $1.5 billion;billion and a total expected investment of $2.5 billion when completed and leased, leaving $1.0 billion remaining to be spent);

completion of the development and leasing of the properties in our consolidated development portfolio (a);

 

development of new properties for long-term investment, including the acquisition of land in certain markets;

 

capital expenditures and leasing costs on properties in our operating portfolio;

 

additional investments in current unconsolidated entities or new investments in future unconsolidated entities;

 

depending on market and other conditions, acquisition of operating properties and/or portfolios of operating properties in global or regional markets for direct, long-term investment in our consolidated portfolio (this might include acquisitions from our co-investment ventures); and

 

depending on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors, we may repurchase our outstanding debt or equity securities through cash purchases, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise.

(a)As of December 31, 2012, we had 45 properties in our development portfolio that were 57.4% leased with a current investment of $959.6 million and a total expected investment of $1.7 billion when completed and leased, leaving $759.3 million remaining to be spent.

We expect to fund our cash needs principally from the following sources, all subject to market conditions:

 

available unrestricted cash balances ($100.8350.7 million at December 31, 2012)2014);

 

property operations;

 

fees and incentives earned for services performed on behalf of the co-investment ventures and distributions received from the co-investment ventures;

 

proceeds from the disposition of properties, land parcels or other investments to third parties;

 

proceeds from the contributions or sales of properties to current or future co-investment ventures, including our planned contributions to NPR and PELP;ventures;

 

borrowing capacity under our current credit facility arrangements discussed below ($1.22.7 billion available as ofat December 31, 2012)2014), other facilities or borrowing arrangements;

proceeds from the issuance of equity securities;securities, including through the ATM program (we issued 3.3 million shares of common stock in 2014, generating net proceeds of $140.1 million – see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on this program); and

 

proceeds from the issuance of debt securities, including secured mortgage debt.

Debt

As ofDebt balances at December 31 2012,consisted of the following (dollars in millions):

    2014   2013 

Debt outstanding

  $9,380    $9,011  

Weighted average interest rate

   3.6%     4.2%  

Weighted average maturity (in months)

   70     58  

In order to economically hedge our investment in Europe, reduce our borrowing costs and extend our maturities, during 2014 we had $11.8issued several series of notes denominated in euro, as follows (dollars and euros in thousands):

2014  

Principal

Amount

   Interest
Rate
   Effective
Interest Rate
   Maturity
Date
 

February 2014

  700,000    $959,420     3.375%     3.52%     February 2024  

June 2014

  500,000    $680,550     3.000%     3.10%     June 2026  

October 2014

  600,000    $756,420     1.375%     1.40%     October 2020  

We used the proceeds from these issuances to repay or redeem $1.3 billion of debt. During 2012outstanding senior notes scheduled to mature in 2015 through 2022, secured mortgage debt of $528.0 million, fund additional investments in our co-investment ventures and general corporate purposes.

In 2014, we temporarily increasedterminated our debt by $1.4 billion as part of the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitionsexisting senior term loan agreement and the issuance of $493.1entered into a new agreement under which loans can be obtained in U.S. dollars, euro, Japanese yen and British pounds sterling in an aggregate amount not to exceed €500 million of new debt, offset partially by repayments of debt.

As of($607.1 million at December 31, 2012,2014). We may pay down and re-borrow under this arrangement. We had borrowings of €190 million ($230.7 million at December 31, 2014). We also entered into a Japanese yen term loan under which we may obtain loans in an aggregate amount not to exceed ¥40.9 billion ($342.1 million at December 31, 2014). We had fully drawn this term loan at December 31, 2014.

At December 31, 2014, we had credit facilities with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $2.1$2.7 billion, all of which $1.2 billion was available remaining capacity.for borrowing.

As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. These covenants, which include customary financial covenants for total debt ratios, encumbered debt ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios.

In February 2013, we entered into a $500 million bridge loan under which we can borrow in U.S. dollar, euro or yen. We borrowed ¥20 billion under the bridge loan to make our initial cash investment in NPR. As discussed earlier, on February 14, 2013 we closed on the contribution of properties to NPR and received ¥153 billion ($1.7 billion) in net cash proceeds, which were used to pay down existing secured mortgage debt on the properties being contributed, the borrowings outstanding on this bridge loan and the remainder will be used to repay the outstanding borrowings on our credit facilities.

In connection with the PELP contribution, we expect to use the proceeds to further reduce debt and to fund our development and acquisition activities.

See Note 109 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on our debt.

Equity Commitments Related to Certain Co-Investment Ventures

Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We are committed to offer to contribute certain properties that we develop and stabilize in select markets in Europe, Mexico and Japan to certain co-investment ventures. These ventures are committed to acquire such properties, subject to certain exceptions, including that the properties meet certain specified leasing and other criteria, and that the ventures have available capital. Generally the venture obtains financing for the properties and therefore the equity commitment is less than the acquisition price of the real estate. We are not obligated to contribute properties at a loss. Depending on market conditions, the investment objectives of the ventures, our liquidity needs and other factors, we may make contributions of properties to these ventures through the remaining commitment period.

The following table is a summary of remaining equity commitments as of December 31, 2012 (in millions):

   Equity commitments   Expiration date for remaining
commitments
 

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (1)

   

Prologis

 $-     Open-Ended (1) 

Venture Partners

 $30.0    
 

 

 

 

Prologis SGP Mexico (2)

   

Prologis

 $24.6     (2

Venture Partner

 $98.1    
 

 

 

 

Europe Logistics Venture 1 (3)

   

Prologis

 $54.5     February 2014  

Venture Partner

 $309.0    
 

 

 

 

Prologis China Logistics Venture 1

   

Prologis

 $68.6     March 2015  

Venture Partner

 $388.7    
 

 

 

 

Total Unconsolidated

   

Prologis

 $147.7    

Venture Partner

 $825.8    
 

 

 

 

Prologis Brazil Fund

   

Prologis

 $118.5     December 2013  

Venture Partner

 $118.5    
 

 

 

 

Total Consolidated

   

Prologis

 $118.5    

Venture Partner

 $118.5    
 

 

 

 

Grand Total

   

Prologis

 $266.2    

Venture Partners

 $944.3       

(1)We secured $295.5 million in commitments from third parties in 2012 in order to fund future acquisitions from us and third parties that meet the venture’s investment strategy, or to pay down existing debt. During 2012, the venture called capital of $265.5 million from these investors primarily to fund third party acquisitions.

(2)These equity commitments will be called only if needed to pay outstanding debt of the venture. The relevant debt was due in 2012, which was automatically extended until the third quarter of 2013. There is also an option to extend until the third quarter of 2014.

(3)Equity commitments are denominated in euro and reported above in U.S. dollar. During 2012, this venture acquired two buildings from third parties with capital previously called. Also during 2012, this venture called capital of €136.0 million ($178.6 million) of which €20.4 million ($26.8 million) represented our share to fund the contribution of nine buildings from us and the acquisition of one building from a third party.

For more information on equity commitments for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, see Note 65 to ourthe Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements. We have one consolidated co-investment venture, the Brazil Fund, with equity commitments at December 31, 2014, of $75.4 million, of which $37.7 million is our share and expires in Item 8.December 2017. The equity commitments are denominated in Brazilian real and called and reported in U.S. dollars.

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $463.5$704.5 million, $207.1$485.0 million and $240.8$463.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively. In 2012, 20112013 and 2010,2012, cash provided by operating activities was less than the cash dividends paid on common and preferred stock by $88.9 million and $104.3 million, $207.0 million and $65.3 million, respectively. WeIn both years, we used a portion of the cash proceeds from the disposition of real estate properties ($2.05.4 billion in 2012, $1.62013 and $2.0 billion in both 2011 and 2010)2012) to fund dividends on common and preferred stock not covered by cash flows from operating activities.

Cash Investing and Cash Financing Activities

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, investing activities provided net cash of $529.6 million, used net cash of $233.1$488.3 million and provided net cash of $733.3$2.3 billion and $529.6 million, respectively. The following are the significant activities for all periods presented:

 

We generated cash from contributions and dispositions of properties and land parcels of $2.0 billion in 2012 and $1.6 billion in both 2011 and 2010. In 2012, we disposed of land, land subject to ground leases and 200 operating properties and contributed 25 operating properties to unconsolidated entities. We have a stated objective to reduce debt that we expect to achieve in part with proceeds received from sales and contributions of properties and, therefore, expect this activity to continue. In 2011, we disposed of land, land subject to ground leases and 94 operating properties that included the majority of our non-industrial assets and contributed 57 operating properties to unconsolidated entities. In 2010, we disposed of land and 205 operating properties and contributed 9 operating properties to unconsolidated entities.

Real estate development.In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we invested $1.1 billion, $845.2 million and $793.3 million, respectively, in real estate development and leasing costs for first generation leases. We have 55 properties under development and 24 properties that were completed but not stabilized at December 31, 2014, and we expect to continue to develop new properties as the opportunities arise.

 

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, we invested $793.3 million, $811.0 million and $324.5 million, respectively, in real estate development and leasing costs for first generation leases. We have 30 properties under development and 15 properties that are completed but not stabilized as of December 31, 2012 and we expect to continue to develop new properties as the opportunities arise.

Real estate acquisitions.In 2014, we acquired total real estate of $612.3 million, which included 1,055 acres of land and eight operating properties. In 2013, we acquired 536 acres of land and 26 operating properties for a combined total of $514.6 million, which includes properties acquired in connection with the wind-down of Prologis Japan Fund I. In 2012, we acquired 1,537 acres of land and 12 operating properties for a combined total of $254.4 million.

 

We invested $214.2 million, $144.1 million and $85.8 million in our operating properties during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which included recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions on existing operating properties that were previously leased. The increase in 2012 is primarily a result of our larger portfolio from the Merger, PEPR Acquisition and Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions and our significant leasing activity.

Capital expenditures.We invested $212.6 million, $228.0 million and $214.2 million in our operating properties during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which included recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions on existing operating properties that were previously leased.

 

Investments in and advances to.In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we invested cash of $739.6 million, $1.2 billion and $165.0 million, respectively, in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, net of repayment of advances. Our investment in 2014 principally relates to additional investments in PELP of $461.2 million, Brazil Fund and related joint ventures of $66.3 million, Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund of $72.9 million, NPR of $56.6 million and Prologis European Properties Fund II of $53.1 million, in each case, representing our proportionate share. The co-investment ventures used these investments for the acquisition of operating properties, the repayment of debt by the ventures and development costs. Our investment in 2013

In 2012, we acquired 1,537 acres of land and 12 operating properties aggregating 1.6 million square feet for a combined total of $254.4 million. In 2011, we acquired 78 acres of land and 8 operating properties aggregating 1.5 million square feet for a combined total of $214.8 million. In 2010, we acquired 33 acres of land and 10 operating properties aggregating 2.4 million square feet for a combined total of $133.7 million.

principally relates to our investment in NPR of $411.5 million, Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund of $210.2 million, Prologis European Properties Fund II of $167.2 million, PELP of $162.3 million, Brazil Fund and related joint ventures of $111.5 million and Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund of $104.8 million. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on these investments.

 

In connection with the acquisition of NAIF II in 2012, we repaid the loan from NAIF II to our partner for a total of $336.1 million. Also in 2012, we paid $47.8 million in connection with the acquisition of two of our unconsolidated entities.

Return of investment.We received distributions from unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures as a return of investment of $244.3 million, $411.9 million and $291.7 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2013, we received $106.3 million in connection with the wind down of Prologis Japan Fund I. During 2012, we received $95.0 million, which represented a return of capital from one of our other joint ventures that held a note receivable that was repaid.

 

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, we invested cash of $165.0 million, $37.8 million and $335.4 million, respectively, in unconsolidated entities net of repayment of advances by the entities. Our investment in 2012 primarily relates to an increase in our unconsolidated joint ventures in Brazil.

Proceeds from dispositions and contributions.We generated cash from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties of $2.3 billion in 2014, $5.4 billion in 2013 and $2.0 billion in 2012. In 2014, we contributed 115 real estate properties owned on a consolidated basis to FIBRA Prologis and received cash proceeds of $390.6 million, primarily attributable to the third-party partners in AFORES and subsequently distributed the proceeds to them. We also disposed of land, ground leases and 145 operating properties to third parties and contributed 11 operating properties to unconsolidated co-investment ventures. In 2013, we disposed of land and 89 operating properties to third parties and contributed 254 operating properties to unconsolidated co-investment ventures. The activity in 2013 primarily included the contribution of real estate properties to our co-investment ventures, PELP and NPR of $1.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively. In 2012, we disposed of land and 200 operating properties to third parties and contributed 25 operating properties to unconsolidated co-investment ventures.

 

We received distributions from unconsolidated entities as a return of investment of $291.7 million, $170.2 million and $220.2 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We received $95.0 million during 2012, which represented a return of capital, from one of our other joint ventures that held a note receivable that was repaid during the year.

Purchase of a controlling interest.In 2014, we paid net cash of $590.4 million to acquire a controlling interest in NAIF. In 2013, we paid net cash of $678.6 million to acquire our partners’ interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund III and SGP Mexico. In connection with the acquisition of Prologis North American Industrial Fund II (“NAIF II”) in 2012, we repaid the loan from NAIF II to our partner for a total of $336.1 million. The loan repayment was reduced by the cash acquired in the consolidation of NAIF II. Also in 2012, we paid $47.8 million in connection with the acquisition of two of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.

 

In 2012 we received a full redemption of a $55.0 million note receivable that was issued in 2011 through the sale of non-industrial assets. In 2010, we invested $188.0 million in a preferred equity interest in a subsidiary of a buyer of a portfolio of assets and we purchased an $81.0 million loan to NAIF II from the lender.

In connection with the Merger in 2011, we acquired $234.0 million in cash.

During the second quarter of 2011, we used $1.0 billion of cash to purchase units in PEPR. The acquisition was funded with borrowings on a new €500 million bridge facility (“PEPR Bridge Facility”), put in place for the acquisition, and borrowings under our other credit facilities that were subsequently paid from our equity offering (see below for more detail).

Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable.In June 2014, we received $188.0 million for the payment in full of the notes receivable backed by real estate that originated in 2010 through the sale of a portfolio of industrial properties. In 2012, we received a full redemption of a $55.0 million note receivable that was issued in 2011 through the sale of non-industrial assets.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, financing activities used net cash of $1.1 billion, provided net cash of $163.3$337.8 million and used net cash of $1.0$2.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. The following are the significant activities for all periods presented:

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock.

In 2012,December 2014, we repurchased and extinguished exchangeable senior notes, secured mortgage debt, senior term loans, and secured mortgage and other debtreceived gross proceeds of consolidated entities for $1.7 billion.$142.1 million from the issuance of 3.3 million shares of common stock from our ATM program. In 2011 and 2010,April 2013, we repurchased and extinguished senior notes, exchangeable senior notes and secured mortgage debt for $894.2received net proceeds of $1.4 billion from the issuance of 35.65 million and $3.1 billion, respectively.shares of common stock.

 

In 2012, we incurred $1.4 billion of debt, principally secured mortgage debt and senior term loan debt. We used the proceeds from the senior term loan to pay off the two outstanding term loans assumed in connection with the Merger and the remainder to pay down borrowings on our credit facilities. In 2011, we incurred $577.9December 2014, Norges Bank Investment Management exercised a warrant for $213.8 million in secured mortgage debt and borrowed $721.0exchange for six million onshares of Prologis common stock. See Note 4 to the PEPR Bridge Facility. In 2010, we issued $1.1 billion of senior notes due 2017 and 2020 and $460.0 million of exchangeable senior notes due 2015. The proceeds were used to repay borrowings under our credit facilities. We also incurred $300.3 million in secured mortgage debt.

We received net proceeds on our credit facilities of $9.1 million in 2012 and borrowed a net $37.6 million and $246.3 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. In connection with the Merger in 2011, we repaid the outstanding balance under our existing global line of credit and entered into new credit facilities.

We made net payments of $196.7 million, $975.5 million and $257.5 million on regularly scheduled debt principal and maturity payments during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In 2011, we used $711.8 million in proceeds from our equity offering to repay the amounts borrowed under the PEPR Bridge Facility. Additionally, 2011 activity included the repayment of €101.3 million ($146.8 million) of the euro notes that matured in April 2011.Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.

 

We generated proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our incentive stock plans, principallyprimarily from the exercise of stock options, of $22.3 million, $22.4 million and $31.0 million in 2012. We had minimal activity in 2011. We generated proceeds from the sale2014, 2013 and issuance of common stock under our various common share plans of $30.8 million during 2010, primarily from our at-the-market equity issuance program. The at-the-market equity program was terminated in connection with the Merger.

We paid distributions of $520.3 million, $387.1 million and $280.7 million to our common stockholders during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We paid dividends on our preferred stock of $47.6 million, $27.0 million and $25.4 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

As part of the liquidation of PEPR, we made payments of $117.3 million in 2012 to purchase additional units of PEPR. Also in 2012, we purchased shares in Prologis Institutional Alliance Fund II for $14.1 million and our partner’s interest in certain properties in the Brazil Fund of $4.4 million and redeemed units of our limited partners in the Operating Partnership for cash of $5.8 million.

Dividends paid on common and preferred stock.We paid dividends of $672.2 million, $573.9 million and $567.8 million to our common and preferred stockholders during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

In 2012 and 2011, noncontrolling interest partners made contributions of $70.8 million and $123.9 million, respectively, primarily for the purchase of real estate properties by our consolidated co-investment venture, Mexico Fondo Logistico. In addition, we distributed $44.1 million and $17.4 million to various noncontrolling interests in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Redemption and repurchase of preferred stock.In 2014, we paid $27.6 million to repurchase shares of series Q preferred stock. In 2013, we paid $482.5 million to redeem all of the outstanding series L, M, O, P, R and S of preferred stock.

 

Noncontrolling interest contributions.In 2014, 2013 and 2012, partners in consolidated co-investment ventures made contributions of $468.3 million, $145.5 million and $70.8 million, respectively. In 2014, the contributions were primarily related to the newly formed co-investment venture USLV. In 2013 and 2012, contributions from noncontrolling interest partners were primarily for the purchase of real estate properties by AFORES and development within Brazil Fund and related joint ventures.

In June 2011, we completed an equity offering and issued 34.5 million shares of common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion. The proceeds were used to repay the PEPR Bridge Facility completely and the remainder was used to repay a portion of the borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities. In 2010, we received net proceeds of $1.1 billion from the issuance of 41.1 million common shares.

Noncontrolling interest distributions.We distributed $315.4 million, $116.0 million and $44.1 million to various noncontrolling interests in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The distributions in 2014 were principally related to a cash distribution of $249.9 million to our partners in AFORES due to buildings contributed to FIBRA Prologis and $28.6 million to our partners in Prologis AMS due to the disposition of the remaining properties of the venture. Distributions in 2013 include cash distributions of $40.6 million to our partners in Prologis AMS due to the disposition of a portfolio of properties.

Purchase of noncontrolling interest.In 2013, we purchased our partner’s interest in Prologis Alliance Fund II (“Fund II”), a consolidated co-investment venture, for $245.8 million. In 2012, we purchased an additional interest in ProLogis European Properties (“PEPR”) for $117.3 million and Fund II for $14.1 million.

Net proceeds from (payments on) credit facilities.We made net payments of $717.4 million and $93.1 million in 2014 and 2013 respectively, on our credit facilities and received net proceeds of $9.1 million in 2012 from our credit facilities.

Repurchase and payment of debt.During 2014, we made payments of $2.2 billion on our previous term loan, $0.1 billion on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished exchangeable senior notes and secured mortgage debt of $1.9 billion. During 2013, we repurchased and extinguished exchangeable senior notes, secured mortgage debt, senior term loans and other debt of consolidated entities and made regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity for a combined total of $6.0 billion. During 2012, we extinguished certain senior notes, exchangeable senior notes, secured mortgage debt, senior term loans, other debt and made regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity for a combined total of $1.9 billion.

Proceeds from the issuance of debt.In 2014, we issued €1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) of senior notes, $2.3 billion of term loans and $70.7 million of secured debt. In 2013, we issued senior notes, secured mortgage debt, term loan debt and other debt of $3.6 billion. In 2012, we issued $1.4 billion of debt, principally secured mortgage debt and senior term loan debt. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the senior note issuances in 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures Debt

We had investments in and advances to certainour unconsolidated co-investment ventures, at December 31, 20122014, of $2.0$4.7 billion. These unconsolidated ventures had total third partythird-party debt of $7.2$6.6 billion (in the aggregate, not(of which $1.9 billion was our proportionate share) at December 31, 2012.2014. This debt is primarily secured, or collateralized by properties within the venture and is non-recourse to Prologis or the other investors in the co-investment ventures and matures as follows (in(dollars in millions):

 

   2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  Thereafter  

Discount/

Premium

  Total (1)  Prologis
Ownership
% at
12/31/12
 

Prologis North American Industrial Fund

 $80.0   $-   $108.7   $444.0   $205.0   $354.5   $-   $1,192.2    23.1

Prologis North American Industrial Fund III (2)

  502.4    146.2    -   -   -   -   (0.8  647.8    20.0

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (3)

  187.1    103.3    180.2    241.5    14.2    823.2    16.6    1,566.1    23.9

Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund

  -   -   -   -   214.1    -   -   214.1    20.0

Prologis SGP Mexico

  62.5    3.9    4.1    144.8    -   -   -   215.3    21.6

Prologis European Properties Fund II

  84.7    574.0    258.9    233.8    66.5    520.3    (4.1  1,734.1    29.7

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund

  9.6    395.2    232.1    2.3    2.5    -   8.4    650.1    32.4

Prologis Japan Fund 1 (4)

  478.6    2.4    4.1    110.4    249.5    -   3.9    848.9    20.0

Prologis China Logistics Venture 1

  -   -   -   124.0    -   -   -   124.0    15.0
 

 

 

  

Total co-investment ventures

 $1,404.9   $1,225.0   $788.1   $1,300.8   $751.8   $1,698.0   $24.0   $7,192.6   
                    

Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

  Prologis
Share
 
   2015  2016  2017  Thereafter  Disc/
Prem
  Total   $  % 

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund

 $149   $158   $14   $1,268   $9   $1,598    4.6%   $389    24.3

FIBRA Prologis

  9    252    216    172    32    681    5.3%    312    45.9

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund

  4    4    4    468        480    2.6%    207    43.2

Prologis European Properties Fund II

  270    195    76    1,421    (6)    1,956    3.8%    608    31.1

Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl

  3    203            2    208    3.8%    104    50.0

Nippon Prologis REIT

      195    19    1,142    3    1,359    1.1%    205    15.1

Prologis China Logistics Venture

  173            120        293    3.1%    44    15.0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total co-investment ventures

 $608   $1,007   $329   $4,591   $40   $6,575    3.5%   $1,869      

At December 31, 2014, we did not guarantee any third-party debt of the co-investment ventures. In our role as the manager, we work with the co-investment ventures to refinance their maturing debt. There can be no assurance that the co-investment ventures will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness on terms as favorable as the maturing debt, or at all. If the ventures are unable to refinance the maturing indebtedness with newly issued debt, they may be able to obtain funds by voluntary capital contributions from us and our partners or by selling assets. Certain of the ventures also have credit facilities, or unencumbered properties, both of which may be used to obtain funds.

(1)As of December 31, 2012, we had guaranteed $30.4 million of the third party debt of the co-investment ventures. In our role as the manager, we work with the co-investment ventures to refinance their maturing debt. There can be no assurance that the co-investment ventures will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness on terms as favorable as the maturing debt, or at all. If the ventures are unable to refinance the maturing indebtedness with newly issued debt, they may be able to obtain funds by voluntary capital contributions from us and our partners or by selling assets. Certain of the ventures also have credit facilities, or unencumbered properties, both of which may be used to obtain funds. Generally, the co-investment ventures issue long-term debt and utilize the proceeds to repay borrowings under the credit facilities.

(2)This venture is working with the lender to extend the maturity of this debt and may also sell properties and use the proceeds to repay debt.

(3)This venture expects to pay 2013 maturities through asset sales, equity contributions and the issuance of new debt.

(4)This venture expects to sell certain properties in 2013 and use the proceeds to repay debt.

Contractual Obligations

Long-Term Contractual Obligations

We had long-term contractual obligations at December 31, 20122014 as follows (in millions):

 

   Payments Due By Period 
    Less than 1
year
   1 to 3 years   3 to 5 years   More than
5 years
   Total 

Debt obligations, other than credit facilities

  $          1,476    $3,580    $2,335    $3,445    $10,836  

Interest on debt obligations, other than credit facilities

   483     764     558     432     2,237  

Unfunded commitments on the development portfolio (1)

   546     213     -    -    759  

Operating lease payments

   38     71     58     385     552  

Amounts due on credit facilities

   -    889     -    -    889  

Interest on credit facilities

   16     11     -    -    27  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $2,559    $5,528    $2,951    $4,262    $15,300  
   Payments Due By Period 
    Less than
1 year
   1 to 3 years   3 to 5 years   More than
5 years
   Total 

Debt obligations, other than credit facilities and exchangeable debt

  $139    $1,712    $1,520    $5,462    $8,833  

Interest on debt obligations, other than credit facilities and exchangeable debt

   352     623     471          1,446  

Exchangeable debt

   460                    460  

Interest on exchangeable debt

   3                    3  

Unfunded commitments on the development portfolio (1)

   746     193               939  

Operating lease payments

   32     58     51     392     533  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,732    $2,586    $2,042    $5,854    $12,214  

 

(1)We had properties in our development portfolio (completed and under development) at December 31, 20122014, with a total expected investment of $1.7$2.5 billion. The unfunded commitments presented include not only those costs that we are obligated to fund under construction contracts, but all costs necessary to place the property into service, including the estimated costs of tenant improvements, marketing and leasing costs that we will incur as the property is leased.

Distribution and Dividend Requirements

Our dividend policy on our common stock is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow to ensure we will meet the dividend requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, relative to maintaining our real estate investment trust status, while still allowing us to retain cash to meet other needs such as capital improvements and other investment activities.

In 2014 and 2013, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.33 and $0.28 per common share, respectively. Our future common stock dividends may vary and will be determined by our board of directors upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results and real estate investment trust distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the board of directors during the year.

At December 31, 2014, we had one series of preferred stock outstanding – series Q. The annual dividend rate is 8.54% per share and dividends are payable quarterly in arrears.

Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.

Other Commitments

On a continuing basis, we are engaged in various stages of negotiations for the acquisition and/or disposition of individual properties or portfolios of properties.

Distribution and Dividend Requirements

Our dividend policy on our common stock is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow to ensure we will meet the dividend requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, relative to maintaining our REIT status, while still allowing us to retain cash to meet other needs such as capital improvements and other investment activities.

In 2012, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share. A cash dividend of $0.28 for the first quarter of 2013 was declared on February 27, 2013. This dividend will be paid on March 29, 2013 to holders of common shares on March 12, 2013. Our future common stock dividends may vary and will be determined by our Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.

At December 31, 2012, we had seven series of preferred stock outstanding. The annual dividend rates on preferred stock are 6.5% per Series L share, 6.75% per Series M share, 7.0% per Series O share, 6.85% per Series P share, 8.54% per Series Q share, 6.75% per Series R share and 6.75% per Series S share. The dividends on preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears.

Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock has been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.

Critical Accounting Policies

A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of an entity’s financial condition and results of operations and requires judgment on the part of management. Generally, the judgment requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past and current economic conditions and expectations for the future. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. Changes in estimates could affect our financial position and specific items in our results of operations that are used by stockholders, potential investors, industry analysts and lenders in their evaluation of our performance. Of the accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 8, those presented below have been identified by us as critical accounting policies.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

We assess the carrying values of our respective long-lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable.

Recoverability of real estate assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review our real estate assets for recoverability, we consider current market conditions, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Our intent with regard to the underlying assets might change as market conditions change, as well as other factors, especially in the current global economic environment. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques; including discounted cash flow models, applying a capitalization rate to estimated net operating income of a property, quoted market values and third party appraisals, where considered necessary. The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan we use to manage our underlying business. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the real estate asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill at the reporting unit level. The annual review is performed during the fourth quarter for all our reporting units. Additionally, we evaluate the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill may not be fully recoverable.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update that permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. We utilized the qualitative assessment for our 2012 annual impairment test.

Assumptions and estimates used in the recoverability analyses for future cash flows, discount rates and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions or our intent with regard to our investment that occurs subsequent to our impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment of our real estate properties and/or goodwill.

Other than Temporary Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we determine there is a loss in value that is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the

investment at fair value. The use of projected future cash flows and other estimates of fair value, the determination of when a loss is other than temporary, and the calculation of the amount of the loss, is complex and subjective. Use of other estimates and assumptions may result in different conclusions. Changes in economic and operating conditions, as well as changes in our intent with regard to our investment, that occur subsequent to our review could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of our equity investments.

Revenue Recognition – Gains on Disposition of Real Estate

We recognize gains from the contributions and sales of real estate assets, generally at the time the title is transferred, consideration is received and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. In many of our transactions, an entity in which we have an ownership interest will acquire a real estate asset from us. We make judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that we recognize given our continuing ownership interest and our level of future involvement with the entity that acquires the assets. We also make judgments regarding recognition in earnings of certain fees and incentives based on when they are earned, fixed and determinable.

Business Combinations

We acquire individual properties, as well as portfolios of properties, or businesses. When we acquire a business or individual operating properties, with the intention to hold the investment for the long-term, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. The components typically include land, building, debt, intangible assets related to above and below market leases, value of costs to obtain tenants, deferred tax liabilities and other assumed assets and liabilities in the case of an acquisition of a business. In an acquisition of multiple properties, we must also allocate the purchase price among the properties. The allocation of the purchase price is based on our assessment of estimated fair value and often times is based upon the expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located. The fair value may also include an enterprise value premium that we estimate a third party would be willing to pay for a portfolio of properties. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, which typically does not exceed one year.

Consolidation

We consolidate all entities that are wholly ownedwholly-owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity and whether the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary through consideration of the substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Investments in entities in whichthat we do not control but over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are presented under the equity method. Investments in entities that we do not control and over which we do not exercise significant influence are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, as appropriate. Our ability to correctly assess our influence and/or control over an entity affects the presentation of these investments in our consolidated financial statements.the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Combinations

Upon acquisition of real estate that constitutes a business, which includes acquiring a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. The components typically include land, building, debt, intangible assets related to above and below market leases, value of costs to obtain tenants, deferred tax liability and other assumed assets and liabilities in the case of an acquisition of a business. In an acquisition of multiple properties, we must also allocate the purchase price among the properties. The allocation of the purchase price is based on our assessment of estimated fair value and often is based upon the expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located. The fair value may also include an enterprise value premium that we estimate a third party would be willing to pay for a portfolio of properties. In the case of an acquisition of a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting, this allocation may result in a gain or a loss. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, not to exceed one year.

Capitalization of Costs and Depreciation

We capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving real estate assets as part of the investment basis. Costs incurred in making repairs and maintaining real estate assets are expensed as incurred. During the land development and construction periods, we capitalize interest costs, insurance, real estate taxes and certain general and administrative costs of the personnel performing development, renovations and rehabilitation if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to get the asset ready for its intended use. Capitalized costs are included in the investment basis of real estate assets. We also capitalize costs incurred to successfully originate a lease that result directly from, and are essential to, the acquisition of that lease. Leasing costs that meet the requirements for capitalization are presented as a component of other assets.

We estimate the depreciable portion of our real estate assets and related useful lives in order to record depreciation expense. Our ability to estimate the depreciable portions of our real estate assets and useful lives is critical to the determination of the appropriate amount of depreciation expense recorded and the carrying value of the underlying assets. Any change to the assets to be depreciated and the estimated depreciable lives of these assets would have an impact on the depreciation expense recognized.

Revenue Recognition – Gains on Disposition of Real Estate and Strategic Capital Income

We recognize gains from the contributions and sales of real estate assets, generally at the time the title is transferred, consideration is received and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. In many of our transactions, an entity in which we have an equity investment will acquire a real estate asset from us. We make judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that we recognize given our continuing ownership interest and our level of future involvement with the entity that acquires the assets. In addition, we make judgments regarding recognition in earnings of certain fees and incentives earned for services provided to these entities based on when they are earned, fixed and determinable.

Other than Temporary Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we determine there is a loss in value that is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the investment at fair value. The use of projected future cash flows and other estimates of fair value, the determination of when a loss is other than temporary and the calculation of the amount of the loss is complex and subjective. Use of other estimates and assumptions may result in different conclusions. Changes in economic and operating conditions, as well as changes in our intent with regard to our investment that occur subsequent to our review, could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of our equity investments.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivatives instruments can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Accounting for derivatives as hedges requires that at inception, and over the term of the instruments, the hedged item and derivative qualify for hedge accounting. The rules and interpretations for derivatives are complex. Failure to apply this guidance correctly may result in all changes in fair value of the derivative being recognized in earnings.

We assess both at inception, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. Any ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives not designated as hedges are to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and variable interest rates but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements.

See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our derivative financial instrument policy.

Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our income tax liability for each taxable entity, the liability associated with open tax years that are under review, our REIT taxable income and our compliance with REIT requirements. Our estimates are based on interpretation of tax laws. We estimate our actual current income tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for book and tax purposes resulting in the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. These estimates may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities,liabilities; changes in assessments of the recognition of income tax benefits for certain non-routine transactions,transactions; changes due to audit adjustments by federal, international and state tax authorities,authorities; our inability to qualify as a REIT,REIT; the potential for built-in-gain recognition,built-in gain recognition; changes in the assessment of properties to be contributed to taxable REIT subsidiaries and changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within income tax expense. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more-likely-than-not”“more likely than not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.

Derivative Financial InstrumentsImpairment of Long-Lived Assets

All derivatives are recognized at fair value inWe assess the carrying values of our Consolidated Balance Sheets within the line itemsOther Assetsrespective long-lived assets whenever events orAccounts Payable and Accrued Expenses, as applicable. We do not net our derivative position by counterparty for purposes of balance sheet presentation and disclosure. The accounting for gains and losses that result from changes in circumstances indicate that the fair valuescarrying amounts of derivative instruments depends on whetherthese assets may not be fully recoverable.

Recoverability of real estate assets is measured by comparison of the derivatives are designatedcarrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review our real estate assets for recoverability, we consider current market conditions, as and qualifywell as hedging instruments. Derivatives can be designatedour intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Our intent with regard to the underlying assets might change as fairmarket conditions change. Fair value hedges,is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations.

For derivatives that will be accounted for as hedging instruments in accordance with the accounting standards, we formally designate and document, at inception, the financial instrument asmodels, applying a hedgecapitalization rate to estimated NOI of a specific underlying exposure, the risk management objectiveproperty, quoted market values and third-party appraisals, where considered necessary. The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition,strategic plan we formally assess both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. Any ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and may be useduse to manage our exposureunderlying business. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of a real estate property that we expect to foreign currency fluctuations and variable interest rates but dohold is not meetrecoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the strict hedge accounting requirements.

Changes inamount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and hedgesthe real estate property. At the time our intent changes to dispose of net investments in foreign operations are recorded inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss inone of our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due toreal estate properties, we compare the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instruments and the underlying exposures hedged, fluctuations in thecarrying value of the derivative instruments will generally be offset by changesproperty to the estimated proceeds from disposition. If there is an impairment, we record an impairment for any excess, including costs to sell.

Assumptions and estimates used in the fair values orrecoverability analyses for future cash flows, discount rates and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions or our intent with regard to our investment that occurs subsequent to our impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment of the underlying exposures being hedged. The changes in fair values of derivatives that were not designated and/or did not qualify as hedging instruments are immediately recognized in earnings. For cash flow hedges, we reclassify changes in the fair value of derivatives into the applicable line item in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period that the underlying hedged items affect earnings.long-lived assets.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.Statements.

Funds from Operations (“FFO”)

FFO is a non-GAAPfinancial measure that is not determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), but is a measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO is net earnings. Although the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) has published a definition of FFO, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of FFO are common among REITs,real estate investment trusts, as companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their business.

FFO is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor do we intend it to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and operating performance. We believe net earnings computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP. Further, we believe our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition and our operating performance.

NAREIT’s FFO measure adjusts net earnings computed under GAAP to exclude historical cost depreciation and gains and losses from the sales, along with impairment charges, of previously depreciated properties. We agree that these NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons:

 

(i)historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP assumes, through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on FFO “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” Consequently, NAREIT’s definition of FFO reflects the fact that real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges required by GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities.

 

(ii)REITs were created as a legal form of organization in order to encourage public ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, of gains and losses from the sales, along with impairment charges, of previously depreciated operating real estate assets allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REIT’s activity and assists in comparing those operating results between periods. We include the gains and losses (including impairment charges) from dispositions and impairment charges of land and development properties, as well as our proportionate share of the gains and losses (including impairment charges) from dispositions and impairment chargesof development properties recognized by our unconsolidated entities, in our definition of FFO. We exclude the gain on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest from our definition of FFO.

Our FFO Measures

At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its FFO measure for the REIT industry, it also recognized that “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” We believe stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts who review our operating results are best served by a defined FFO measure

that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT definedNAREIT-defined measure of FFO. Our FFO measures are used by management in analyzing our business and the performance of our properties and we believe that it is important that stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts understand the measures management uses.

We use these FFO measures, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison to expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) assess our performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of short-term items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties. The long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental income. While not infrequent or unusual, these additional items we exclude in calculatingFFO, as defined by Prologis, defined below, are subject to significant fluctuations from period to period that cause both positive and negative short-term effects on our results of operations in inconsistent and unpredictable directions that are not relevant to our long-term outlook.

We use our FFO measures as supplemental financial measures of operating performance. We do not use our FFO measures as, nor should they be considered to be, alternatives to net earnings computed under GAAP, as indicators of our operating performance, as alternatives to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP or as indicators of our ability to fund our cash needs.

FFO, as defined by Prologis

To arrive atFFO, as defined by Prologis, we adjust the NAREIT definedNAREIT-defined FFO measure to exclude:

 

(i)deferred income tax benefits and deferred income tax expenses recognized by our subsidiaries;

 

(ii)current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities that were recorded as deferred tax liabilities in an acquisition, to the extent the expense is offset with a deferred income tax benefit in GAAP earnings that is excluded from our defined FFO measure;

 

(iii)unhedged foreign currency exchange gains and losses resulting from debt transactions between us and our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities;

 

(iv)foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement (based on current foreign currency exchange rates) of certain third partythird-party debt of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities; and

 

(v)mark-to-market adjustments and related amortization of debt discounts associated with derivative financial instruments.

We calculateFFO, as defined by Prologisfor our unconsolidated entities on the same basis as we calculate ourFFO, as defined by Prologis.

We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy.

Core FFO

In addition toFFO, as defined by Prologis, we also useCore FFO.To arrive atCore FFO, we adjustFFO, as defined by Prologis,, to exclude the following recurring and non-recurring items that we recognized directly or our share of these items recognized by our unconsolidated entities to the extent they are included inFFO, as defined by Prologis:

 

(i)gains or losses from acquisition, contribution or sale of land or development properties;

(ii)income tax expense related to the sale of investments in real estate and third-party acquisition costs related to the acquisition of real estate;

(iii)impairment charges recognized related to our investments in real estate (either directly or through our investments in unconsolidated entities) generally as a result of our change in intent to contribute or sell these properties;

(iv)impairment charges of goodwill and other assets;
(v)gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt;debt and redemption and repurchase of preferred stock;

(vi)(v)merger, acquisition and other integration expenses; and

(vii)(vi)expenses related to natural disasters.

We believe it is appropriate to further adjust ourFFO, as defined by Prologis for certain recurring items as they were driven by transactional activity and factors relating to the financial and real estate markets, rather than factors specific to the on-going operating performance of our properties or investments. The impairment charges we have recognized were primarily based on valuations of real estate, which had declined due to market conditions, that we no longer expected to hold for long-term investment. We currently have and have had overOver the past severallast few years, we made it a stated priority to strengthen our financial position. We expect to accomplish thisposition by reducing our debt, our investment in certain low yielding assets such as land that we decide not to develop and our exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As a result, we have soldchanged our intent to third partiessell or contributed to unconsolidated entitiescontribute certain of our real estate properties that, depending on market conditions, might result in a gain or loss. Theand recorded impairment charges relatedwhen we did not expect to goodwill and other assets thatrecover the costs of our investment. Also, we have recognized were similarly caused by the decline in the real estate markets. Also in connection with our stated priority to reduce debt and extend debt maturities, we have purchased portions of our debt securities.securities when we believed it was advantageous to do so, which was based on market conditions, and in an effort to lower our borrowing costs and extend our debt maturities. As a result, we have recognized net gains or losses on the early extinguishment of certain debt due to the financial market conditions at that time.

We have also adjusted for some non-recurring items. The merger, acquisition and other integration expenses includeincluded costs we incurred in 2011 and 2012 associated with the Merger between AMB and PEPR AcquisitionProLogis, the acquisition of ProLogis European Properties and the integration of our systems and processes. We have not adjusted for the

acquisition costs thatIn addition, we have incurred as a resultand our co-investment ventures make acquisitions of routine acquisitions but onlyreal estate and we believe the costs associated with significant business combinations that we would expect to be infrequent in nature. Similarly, the expenses related to the natural disaster in Japan that we recognized in 2011these transactions are a rare occurrence but we may incur similar expenses again in the future.transaction based and not part of our core operations.

We analyze our operating performance primarily by the rental income of our real estate and the revenue driven by our privatestrategic capital business, net of operating, administrative and financing expenses. This income stream is not directly impacted by fluctuations in the market value of our investments in real estate or debt securities. As a result, althoughAlthough these items discussed above have had a material impact on our operations and are reflected in our financial statements, the removal of the effects of these items allows us to better understand the core operating performance of our properties over the long-term.long term.

We useCore FFO, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison to expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) provide guidance to the financial markets to understand our

expected operating performance; (v) assess our operating performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (vi) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties we own. As noted above, we believe the long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental income. We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy.

Limitations on Use of our FFO Measures

While we believe our defined FFO measures are important supplemental measures, neither NAREIT’s nor our measures of FFO should be used alone because they exclude significant economic components of net earnings computed under GAAP and are, therefore, limited as an analytical tool. Accordingly, theythese are twoonly a few of the many measures we use when analyzing our business. Some of these limitations are:

 

The current income tax expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures represent the taxes that are payable.

(i)The current income tax expenses and acquisition costs that are excluded from our defined FFO measures represent the taxes and transaction costs that are payable.

 

Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Further, the amortization of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of industrial properties are not reflected in FFO.

(ii)Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Further, the amortization of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of industrial properties are not reflected in FFO.

 

Gains or losses from property acquisitions and dispositions or impairment charges related to expected dispositions represent changes in the value of the properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized changes in the value of acquired or disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions.

(iii)Gains or losses from property acquisitions and dispositions or impairment charges related to expected dispositions represent changes in value of the properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized changes in the value of acquired or disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions.

 

The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability that may have to be settled at some future point. Our defined FFO measures do not currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement.

(iv)The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability that may have to be settled at some future point. Our defined FFO measures do not currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement.

 

The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measures are limited in that they do not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements.

(v)The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measures are limited in that they do not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements.

 

The impairment charges of goodwill and other assets that we exclude from Core FFO, have been or may be realized as a loss in the future upon the ultimate disposition of the related investments or other assets through the form of lower cash proceeds.

(vi)The gains and losses on extinguishment of debt that we exclude from ourCore FFO, may provide a benefit or cost to us as we may be settling our debt at less or more than our future obligation.

 

The gains and losses on extinguishment of debt that we exclude from our Core FFO, may provide a benefit or cost to us as we may be settling our debt at less or more than our future obligation.

The Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses and the natural disaster expenses that we exclude from Core FFO are costs that we have incurred.

(vii)The merger, acquisition and other integration expenses and the natural disaster expenses that we exclude fromCore FFO are costs that we have incurred.

We compensate for these limitations by using our FFO measures only in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP when making our decisions. This information should be read with our complete consolidated financial statements prepared under GAAP. To assist investors in compensating for these limitations, we reconcile our defined FFO measures to our net earnings computed under GAAP for the years ended December 31 as follows (in thousands).

 

   2012  2011  2010 

FFO:

   

Reconciliation of net loss to FFO measures:

   

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(80,946)   $(188,110)   $(1,295,920)  

Add (deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments:

   

Real estate related depreciation and amortization

  721,436    533,854    278,781  

Impairment charges on certain real estate properties

  34,801    5,300    126,987  

Net gain on non-FFO dispositions and acquisitions

  (222,752)    (7,338)    (179,679)  

Reconciling items related to noncontrolling interests

  (27,680)    (19,889)     

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities

  127,323    147,608    141,721  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal-NAREIT defined FFO

  552,182    471,425    (928,110)  

Add (deduct) our defined adjustments:

   

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains), net

  14,892    (39,034)    11,487  

Deferred income tax benefit

  (8,804)    (19,803)    (52,223)  

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities

  (5,835)    (900)    (5,351)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FFO, as defined by Prologis

  552,435    411,688    (974,197)  

Impairment charges

  264,844    145,028    1,110,072  

Natural disaster expenses

     5,210     

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

  80,676    140,495     

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

  (121,303)    (117,800)    (110,786)  

Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt

  14,114    (258)    201,486  

Income tax expense on dispositions

     7,331    10,783  

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities

  23,097    2,223     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Core FFO

 $813,863   $593,917   $237,358  
    2014   2013   2012 

FFO

      

Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO measures:

      

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

  $622,235    $315,422    $(80,946)  

Add (deduct) NAREIT–defined adjustments:

      

Real estate related depreciation and amortization

   617,814     624,573     705,717  

Impairment charges on certain real estate properties

             34,801  

Gains on dispositions of non-development properties and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

   (553,298)     (271,315)     (207,033)  

Reconciling items related to noncontrolling interests

   47,939     (8,993)     (27,680)  

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities

   186,540     159,792     127,323  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal–NAREIT–defined FFO

   921,230     819,479     552,182  

Add (deduct) our defined adjustments:

      

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains) and related amortization, net

   18,984     32,870     14,892  

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   (56,720)     656     (8,804)  

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities

   4,015     2,168     (5,835)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO, as defined by Prologis

   887,509     855,173     552,435  

Adjustments to arrive at Core FFO:

      

Net gains on dispositions of development properties and land, net

   (152,798)     (336,815)     (121,303)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt and redemption / repurchase of preferred stock, net

   171,817     286,122     14,114  

Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities less third-party share of consolidated entities

   46,619     8,744     23,097  

Impairment charges

             264,844  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

             80,676  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Core FFO

  $953,147    $813,224    $813,863  

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign-exchange related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments. See our risk factors in Item 1A. Risk Factors, specifically:The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position andWe have used certainface risks associated with the use of debt to fund our business activities, including refinancing and interest rate risks, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition if we are unable to make required payments on our debt or are unable to refinance our debt. See also Notes 2 and 18 in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information about our foreign operations and derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign currency put option and forward contracts, to reduce our foreign currency market risk, as we deem appropriate. We have also used interest rate swap agreements to reduce our interest rate market risk. We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and all financial instruments are entered into in accordance with established policies and procedures.instruments.

We monitor our market risk exposures using a sensitivity analysis. Our sensitivity analysis estimates the exposure to market risk sensitive instruments assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in year endexchange or interest rates.rates at December 31, 2014. The results of the sensitivity analysis are summarized below. The sensitivity analysis is of limited predictive value. As a result, our ultimate realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during a future period, hedging strategies at the time and the prevailing interest and foreign currency exchange rates. The failure

Foreign Currency Risk

We are exposed to foreign exchange-related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments. Foreign currency market risk is the possibility that our financial results or financial position could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2014, we had net equity of approximately $1.5 billion, or 11% of total net equity, denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, after consideration of our derivative and non-derivative financial instruments. Based on our sensitivity analysis, a 10% reduction in exchange rates would cause a reduction of $150 million to our net equity.

At December 31, 2014, we had foreign currency forward contracts, which were designated and qualify as net investment hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of $1.1 billion to hedge effectivelya portion of our investments in Europe, including the United Kingdom, and Japan. Based on our sensitivity analysis, a weakening of the U.S. dollar against exchangeeach of the euro, British pound sterling and interest rate changes may materially adversely affectJapanese yen by 10% would

result in a $105 million negative change in our resultscash flows upon settlement. In addition, we also have euro option contracts, which were not designated as hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of operations and financial position.$0.4 billion to mitigate risk associated with the translation of projected net income of our subsidiaries in Europe. A weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro by 10% would result in a $35 million negative change in our cash flows upon settlement.

Interest Rate Risk

Our interest rate risk objective isWe are exposed to limit the impact of future interest rate changes on future earnings and cash flows. To achieve this objective, we primarily borrow on a fixed rate basis for longer-term debt issuances. As ofAt December 31, 2012,2014, we had a total of $3.3 billion$572.7 million of variable rate debt outstanding, all of which $0.9 billion was outstanding on our credit facilities, $0.6 billion was outstanding under a multi-currency senior term loan and $1.8 billion was outstanding secured mortgage debt. As ofloans. At December 31, 2012,2014, we havehad entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix $1.3 billion$342.1 million of our variable rate secured mortgage debt.

Our primary interest rate risk not subject to interest rate swap agreements is created by the variable rate credit facilities, seniorJapanese yen term loan and selected secured mortgage debt.loan. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2014, we had weighted average daily outstanding borrowings of $1.2 billion$181.6 million on our variable rate debtcredit facilities not subject to interest rate swap agreements. Based on the results of a sensitivity analysis assuming a 10% adverse change in interest rates based on our average outstanding balances during the period, the impact was $2.0$0.5 million, which equates to a change in interest rates of 1713 basis points.

Foreign Currency Risk

Foreign currency risk is the possibility that our financial results could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rates relates to the translation of the net income and net investment of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollar, principally euro, British pound sterling and Japanese yen, especially to the extent we wish to repatriate funds to the United States. To mitigate our foreign currency exchange exposure, we borrow in the functional currency of the borrowing entity, when appropriate. We also may use foreign currency put option contracts or other forms of hedging instruments to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with the projected net operating income or net equity of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities. Hedging arrangements involve risks, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements and the risk of fluctuation in the relative value of the foreign currency. The funds required to settle such arrangements could be significant depending on the stability and movement of foreign currency. The failure to hedge effectively against exchange and interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position. We may experience fluctuations in our earnings as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In fourth quarter 2012, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts that expire in April 2013 with an aggregate notional amount of €1.0 billion ($1.3 billion using the forward rate of 1.30) to further hedge a portion of our investment in Europe at a fixed euro rate in U.S. dollars. Based on a sensitivity analysis, a strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro by 10% would result in a $130.0 million positive or negative change, respectively, in our cash flows upon settlement of the forward contract. These derivatives were designated and qualify as hedging instruments and therefore the changes in fair value of these derivatives will be recorded inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We may enter into similar agreements in the future to further hedge our investment in Europe or other jurisdictions.

We also have some exposure to movements in exchange rates related to certain intercompany loans we issue from time to time and we may use foreign currency forward contracts to manage these risks. At December 31, 2012, we had no forward contracts outstanding and, therefore, we may experience fluctuations in our earnings from the remeasurement of these intercompany loans due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

OurThe Consolidated Balance Sheets as ofat December 31, 20122014 and 2011, our2013, the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income (Loss), Equity/Capital and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012,2014, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, together with the reports of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,independent registered public accounting firm, are included under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. Selected unaudited quarterly financial data is presented in Note 2422 of ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures (Prologis, Inc.)

Prologis, Inc. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as ofat December 31, 2012.2014. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2012,2014, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012,2014, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting was conducted as ofat December 31, 20122014, based on the criteria described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as ofat December 31, 2012,2014, the internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting as ofat December 31, 20122014, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Limitations of the Effectiveness of Controls

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Controls and Procedures (Prologis, L.P.)

Prologis, L.P. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as ofAct) at December 31, 2012.2014. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2012,2014, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012,2014, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting was conducted as ofat December 31, 20122014, based on the criteria described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as ofat December 31, 2012,2014, the internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Limitations of the Effectiveness of Controls

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

ITEM 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors and Officers

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Election of Directors — Nominees,” Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers — Certain Information with Respect to Executive Officers, “Additional Information — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance — Code of Ethics and Business Conduct,”Governance” and “Board of Directors and Committees — Audit Committee”Directors” in our 20132015 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Compensation“Executive Compensation Matters” and “Board of Directors and Committees — Compensation Committee — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”Committees” in our 20132015 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees, and Executive Officers — Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plans” in our 20132015 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees, and Executive Officers — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance — Director Independence”Governance” in our 20132015 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the description under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our 20132015 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules:

(a)Financial Statements and Schedules:

1. Financial Statements:

1. FinancialStatements:

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 4944 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

2.Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes or is not applicable.

(b) Exhibits: The Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to Exhibits on pages 128115 to 134120 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(c) Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 4944 of this report, which is incorporated by reference.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE III

 

   Page 

Prologis, Inc. and Prologis L.P.:

  

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   5045  

Prologis, Inc.:

  

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   5448  

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   5549  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

   5650  

Consolidated Statements of Equity

   5751  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   5852  

Prologis, L.P.:

  

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   5953  

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   6054  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

   6155  

Consolidated Statements of Capital

   6256  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   6357  

Prologis, Inc. and Prologis L.P.:

  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   6458  

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   10897  

Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

   11099  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Prologis, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012.2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework(1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 27, 201325, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 201325, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Prologis, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012.2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Prologis, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 27, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Prologis, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 201325, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Prologis, Inc.:

We have audited Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Prologis, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Prologis, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework(1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012,2014, and our report dated February 27, 201325, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 201325, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Prologis, L.P.:

We have audited Prologis, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Prologis, L.P.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Prologis, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Prologis, L.P. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and our report dated February 27, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 2013

PROLOGIS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 December 31,   December 31, 
 2012 2011   2014   2013 

ASSETS

  

ASSETS

  

Investments in real estate properties

 $25,809,123  $24,787,537   $22,190,145    $20,824,477  

Less accumulated depreciation

  2,480,660   2,157,907    2,790,781     2,568,998  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net investments in real estate properties

  23,328,463   22,629,630    19,399,364     18,255,479  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

  2,195,782   2,857,755    4,824,724     4,430,239  

Assets held for sale

   43,934     4,042  

Notes receivable backed by real estate

  188,000   322,834         188,000  

Assets held for sale

  26,027   444,850 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net investments in real estate

  25,738,272   26,255,069    24,268,022     22,877,760  

Cash and cash equivalents

  100,810   176,072    350,692     491,129  

Restricted cash

  176,926   71,992 

Accounts receivable

  171,084   147,999    103,445     107,955  

Other assets

  1,123,053   1,072,780    1,096,064     1,095,463  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

 $        27,310,145  $        27,723,912   $        25,818,223    $        24,572,307  

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

      

Liabilities:

      

Debt

 $11,790,794  $11,382,408   $9,380,199    $9,011,216  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  611,770   639,490    627,999     563,993  

Other liabilities

  1,115,911   1,225,548    626,426     820,645  

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

  18,334   20,992 
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

  13,536,809   13,268,438    10,634,624     10,395,854  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Equity:

      

Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock

  582,200   582,200 

Common stock; $0.01 par value; 461,770 shares and 459,401 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

  4,618   4,594 

Series Q preferred stock at stated liquidation preference of $50 per share; $0.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 1,565 shares and 2,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively

   78,235     100,000  

Common stock; $0.01 par value; 509,498 shares and 498,799 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively

   5,095     4,988  

Additional paid-in capital

  16,411,855   16,349,328    18,467,009     17,974,509  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (233,563)    (182,321)     (600,337)     (435,675)  

Distributions in excess of net earnings

  (3,696,093)    (3,092,162)     (3,974,493)     (3,932,664)  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity

  13,069,017   13,661,639    13,975,509     13,711,158  

Noncontrolling interests

  704,319   793,835    1,208,090     465,295  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total equity

  13,773,336   14,455,474    15,183,599     14,176,453  
 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 $27,310,145  $27,723,912   $25,818,223    $24,572,307  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 2011, 2010

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 2012 2011 2010  2014 2013 2012 

Revenues:

      

Rental income

 $      1,495,202  $    1,030,670  $        549,605  $1,178,609   $1,227,975   $1,459,461  

Rental recoveries

  374,022   264,202   150,500   348,740    331,518    364,320  

Private capital revenue

  126,779   137,619   122,526 

Strategic capital income

  219,871    179,472    126,779  

Development management and other income

  9,958   18,836   17,521   13,567    11,521    9,958  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenues

  2,005,961   1,451,327   840,152   1,760,787    1,750,486    1,960,518  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Expenses:

      

Rental expenses

  505,499   358,559   199,199   430,787    451,938    491,239  

Private capital expenses

  63,820   54,962   40,659 

Strategic capital expenses

  96,496    89,279    63,820  

General and administrative expenses

  228,068   195,161   165,981   247,768    229,207    228,068  

Depreciation and amortization

  642,461    648,668    724,262  

Other expenses

  23,467    26,982    26,556  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

  80,676   140,495               80,676  

Impairment of real estate properties

  252,914   21,237   736,612           252,914  

Depreciation and amortization

  739,981   552,849   294,867 

Other expenses

  26,556   24,031   16,355 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total expenses

  1,897,514   1,347,294   1,453,673   1,440,979    1,446,074    1,867,535  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  108,447   104,033   (613,521)  

Operating income

  319,808    304,412    92,983  

Other income (expense):

      

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

  31,676   59,935   23,678   134,288    97,220    31,676  

Interest expense

  (507,484)    (468,072)    (461,166)    (308,885)    (379,327)    (505,215)  

Impairment of goodwill and other assets

  (16,135)    (126,432)    (412,745)  

Interest and other income, net

  22,878   12,008   15,847   25,768    26,948    22,878  

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

  305,607   111,684   28,488 

Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net

  (20,497)    41,172   (11,081)  

Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net

  (14,114)    258   (201,486)  

Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

  725,790    597,656    305,607  

Foreign currency and derivative losses and related amortization, net

  (17,841)    (33,633)    (20,497)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net

  (165,300)    (277,014)    (14,114)  

Impairment of other assets

          (16,135)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expense)

  (198,069)    (369,447)    (1,018,465)    393,820    31,850    (195,800)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss before income taxes

  (89,622)    (265,414)    (1,631,986)  

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  713,628    336,262    (102,817)  

Current income tax expense

  17,870   21,579   21,724   (61,584)    (126,180)    (17,870)  

Deferred income tax benefit

  (14,290)    (19,803)    (52,223)    87,240    19,447    14,290  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

  3,580   1,776   (30,499)  

Total income tax benefit (expense)

  25,656    (106,733)    (3,580)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

  (93,202)    (267,190)    (1,601,487)  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

  739,284    229,529    (106,397)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

�� 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Discontinued operations:

      

Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale

  27,632   50,638   96,460       6,970    40,827  

Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges and taxes

  35,098   58,614   234,574       116,550    35,098  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total discontinued operations

  62,730   109,252   331,034       123,520    75,925  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consolidated net loss

  (30,472)    (157,938)    (1,270,453)  

Net loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (9,248)    4,524   (43)  

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

  739,284    353,049    (30,472)  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (103,101)    (10,128)    (9,248)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss attributable to controlling interests

  (39,720)    (153,414)    (1,270,496)  

Less preferred stock dividend

  41,226   34,696   25,424 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interests

  636,183    342,921    (39,720)  

Less preferred stock dividends

  7,431    18,391    41,226  

Loss on preferred stock redemption / repurchase

  6,517    9,108      
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(80,946)   $(188,110)   $(1,295,920)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $622,235   $315,422   $(80,946)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic

  459,895   370,534   219,515   499,583    486,076    459,895  
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted

  459,895   370,534   219,515   506,391    491,546    461,848  
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic:

      

Continuing operations

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)   $1.25   $0.40   $(0.35)  

Discontinued operations

  0.14   0.29   1.51       0.25    0.17  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic

 $1.25   $0.65   $(0.18)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted:

      

Continuing operations

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)   $1.24   $0.39   $(0.34)  

Discontinued operations

  0.14   0.29   1.51       0.25    0.16  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted

 $1.24   $0.64   $(0.18)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Dividends per common share

 $1.12  $1.06  $1.25  $1.32   $1.12   $1.12  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Consolidated net loss

  $(30,472)    $(157,938)    $(1,270,453)  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

   (79,014)     (192,591)     (45,248)  

Unrealized gain (loss) and amortization on derivative contracts, net

   17,986    (8,166)     (3,143)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   (91,500)     (358,695)     (1,318,844)  

Net loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (9,248)     4,524    (43)  

Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

   9,786    21,596    2,933 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders

  $        (90,962)    $      (332,575)    $    (1,315,954)  
    2014   2013   2012 

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

  $        739,284    $        353,049    $        (30,472)  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

   (171,401)     (234,680)     (79,014)  

Unrealized gains (losses) and amortization on derivative contracts, net

   (6,498)     19,590     17,986  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   561,385     137,959     (91,500)  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (103,101)     (10,128)     (9,248)  

Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

   13,237     12,978     9,786  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

  $471,521    $140,809    $(90,962)  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

  Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Distributions
in Excess of
Net Earnings
  Non-
controlling
Interests
  Total Equity 
    

Number

of

Shares

  

Par

Value

      

Balance as of January 1, 2010

 $350,000   211,666  $2,117  $8,527,492  $42,298  $(934,583)   $19,962  $8,007,286 

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

                      (1,270,496)    43   (1,270,453)  

Issuances of stock in equity offering, net of issuance costs

      41,069   411   1,086,873               1,087,284 

Effect of common stock plans

      1,725   17   56,595               56,612 

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

      22       600           (600)      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

                  (42,315)        (2,933)    (45,248)  

Unrealized loss and amortization on derivative contracts, net

                  (3,143)            (3,143)  

Distributions

                      (310,643)    (1,340)    (311,983)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

 $350,000   254,482  $2,545  $9,671,560  $(3,160)   $(2,515,722)   $15,132  $7,520,355 

Consolidated net loss

                      (153,414)    (4,524)    (157,938)  

Merger and PEPR Acquisition

  232,200   169,626   1,696   5,552,412           751,068   6,537,376 

Issuances of stock in equity offering, net of issuance costs

      34,500   345   1,111,787               1,112,132 

Effect of common stock plans

      793   8   2,390               2,398 

Capital contributions, net

                          94,020   94,020 

Foreign currency translation losses, net

                  (170,995)        (21,596)    (192,591)  

Unrealized loss and amortization on derivative contracts, net

                  (8,166)            (8,166)  

Distributions and allocations

              11,179       (423,026  (40,265  (452,112
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 $582,200   459,401  $4,594  $16,349,328  $(182,321)   $(3,092,162)   $793,835  $14,455,474 

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

                      (39,720)    9,248   (30,472)  

Adjustment to the Merger purchase price allocation

                          10,163   10,163 

Effect of common stock plans

      2,258    23   72,909               72,932 

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

      111    1    2,380            (2,381)      

Capital contributions, net

                          74,447   74,447 

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

              (13,998)            (128,066)    (142,064)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

                  (69,155)        (9,859)    (79,014)  

Unrealized gain and amortization on derivative contracts, net

                  17,913       73   17,986 

Distributions and allocations

              1,236       (564,211  (43,141  (606,116
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 $      582,200         461,770  $        4,618  $  16,411,855  $      (233,563)   $    (3,696,093)   $    704,319  $  13,773,336 
   Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Distributions
in Excess of
Net Earnings
  Non-
controlling
Interests
  Total Equity 
  Number
of
Shares
  Par
Value
      

Balance at January 1, 2012

 $582,200    459,401   $4,594   $16,349,328   $(182,321)   $(3,092,162)   $793,835   $14,455,474  

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

                 (39,720)    9,248    (30,472)  

Adjustment to the Merger purchase price allocation

                    10,163    10,163  

Effect of equity compensation plans

     2,258    23    72,909             72,932  

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

     111    1    2,380          (2,381)     

Capital contributions, net

                    74,447    74,447  

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

           (13,998)          (128,066)    (142,064)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (69,155)       (9,859)    (79,014)  

Unrealized gains and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              17,913       73    17,986  

Distributions and allocations

           1,236       (564,211)    (43,141)    (606,116)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 $582,200    461,770   $4,618   $16,411,855   $(233,563)   $(3,696,093)   $704,319   $13,773,336  

Consolidated net earnings

                 342,921    10,128    353,049  

Effect of equity compensation plans

     1,351    13    93,692             93,705  

Issuance of stock in equity offering, net of issuance costs

     35,650    357    1,437,340             1,437,697  

Redemption of preferred stock

  (482,200)          8,593       (9,108)       (482,715)  

Issuance of warrant

           32,359             32,359  

Capital contributions

                    146,130    146,130  

Settlement of noncontrolling interests

     28       (7,868)          (247,683)    (255,551)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (221,633)       (13,047)    (234,680)  

Unrealized gains and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              19,521       69    19,590  

Distributions and allocations

           (1,462)       (570,384)    (134,621)    (706,467)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 $    100,000    498,799   $4,988   $17,974,509   $(435,675)   $(3,932,664)   $465,295   $14,176,453  

Consolidated net earnings

                 636,183    103,101    739,284  

Effect of equity compensation plans

     1,383    14    88,424          450    88,888  

Issuance of stock in at-the-market program, net of issuance costs

     3,316    33    140,102             140,135  

Repurchase of preferred stock

  (21,765)          639       (6,517)       (27,643)  

Issuance of stock from exercise of warrant

     6,000    60    213,780             213,840  

Formation of Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture

           13,721          442,251    455,972  

Consolidation of Prologis North American Industrial Fund

              12,507       554,493    567,000  

Capital contributions

                    14,464    14,464  

Settlement of noncontrolling interests

           33,803          (36,243)    (2,440)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (167,950)       (13,214)    (181,164)  

Unrealized losses and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              (9,219)       (23)    (9,242)  

Distributions and allocations

           2,031       (671,495)    (322,484)    (991,948)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 $    78,235    509,498   $  5,095   $  18,467,009   $  (600,337)   $  (3,974,493)   $  1,208,090   $  15,183,599  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

 2012 2011 2010   2014   2013   2012 

Operating activities:

         

Consolidated net loss

 $(30,472)   $  (157,938)   $(1,270,453)  

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

   

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

  $739,284    $353,049    $(30,472)  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Straight-lined rents

  (62,290)    (59,384)    (40,983)     (42,829)     (46,861)     (62,290)  

Stock-based compensation awards, net

  32,138   28,920   25,085 

Equity-based compensation awards

   57,478     49,239     32,138  

Depreciation and amortization

  767,459   603,884   356,694    642,461     664,007     767,459  

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

  (31,676)    (59,935)    (23,678)     (134,288)     (97,220)     (31,676)  

Distributions and changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities

  6,581   58,981   79,671 

Distributions and net changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities

   110,435     75,859     6,581  

Amortization of debt and lease intangibles

  21,008   43,556   79,538    21,113     10,140     21,008  

Non-cash Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

  17,581   20,290     

Non-cash merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

           17,581  

Impairment of real estate properties and other assets

  269,049   147,669   1,149,357            269,049  

Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges, in discontinued operations

  (43,008)    (61,830)    (234,574)  

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

  (305,607)    (111,684)    (28,488)  

Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt, net

  14,114   (258)    201,486 

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains), net

  14,892   (38,398)    11,487 

Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

   (725,790)     (715,758)     (348,615)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net

   165,300     277,014     14,114  

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses and related amortization, net

   22,571     28,619     14,892  

Deferred income tax benefit

  (21,967)    (19,803)    (52,223)     (87,240)     (20,067)     (21,967)  

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash, accounts receivable and other assets

  (178,387)    (40,095)    63,701 

Increase in accounts receivable and other assets

   (93)     (12,912)     (178,387)  

Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities

  (5,923)    (146,911)    (75,837)     (63,871)     (80,120)     (5,923)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  463,492   207,064   240,783    704,531     484,989     463,492  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Investing activities:

         

Real estate development activity

  (793,349)    (811,035)    (324,471)     (1,051,181)     (845,234)     (793,349)  

Real estate acquisitions

  (254,414)    (214,759)    (133,654)     (612,330)     (514,611)     (254,414)  

Tenant improvements and lease commissions on previously leased space

  (133,558)    (88,368)    (57,240)     (133,957)     (145,424)     (133,558)  

Non-development capital expenditures

  (80,612)    (55,702)    (28,565)     (78,610)     (82,610)     (80,612)  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities, net

  (165,011)    (37,755)    (335,396)  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   (739,635)     (1,221,155)     (165,011)  

Return of investment from unconsolidated entities

  291,679   170,158   220,195    244,306     411,853     291,679  

Proceeds from dispositions of real estate properties

  1,975,036   1,644,152   1,642,986 

Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate and other notes receivable

  55,000   6,450   18,440 

Investments in notes receivable backed by real estate and advances on other notes receivable

      (55,000)    (269,000)  

Cash acquired in connection with the Merger

      234,045     

Acquisition of PEPR, net of cash received

      (1,025,251)      

Acquisition of NAIF II and other unconsolidated entities, net of cash received

  (365,156)          

Proceeds from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties

   2,285,488     5,409,745     1,975,036  

Acquisition of a controlling interest in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net of cash received

   (590,390)     (678,642)     (365,156)  

Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate

   188,000         55,000  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  529,615   (233,065)    733,295    (488,309)     2,333,922     529,615  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Financing activities:

         

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

  30,981   1,156,493   1,162,461 

Dividends paid on common stock

  (520,253)    (387,133)    (280,658)  

Dividends paid on preferred stock

  (47,581)    (26,965)    (25,416)  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   378,247     1,505,791     30,981  

Dividends paid on common and preferred stock

   (672,190)     (573,854)     (567,834)  

Redemption of preferred stock

   (27,643)     (482,500)      

Noncontrolling interest contributions

  70,820   123,924        468,280     145,522     70,820  

Noncontrolling interest distributions

  (44,070)    (17,378)    (1,610)     (315,426)     (115,999)     (44,070)  

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

  (142,064)             (2,440)     (250,740)     (142,064)  

Debt and equity issuance costs paid

  (10,963)    (77,241)    (76,580)     (23,420)     (77,017)     (10,963)  

Net proceeds from (payments on) Credit Facilities

  9,064   (37,558)    (246,280)  

Repurchase of debt

  (1,653,989)    (894,249)    (3,104,476)  

Net proceeds from (payments on) credit facilities

   (717,369)     (93,075)     9,064  

Repurchase and payment of debt

   (4,205,806)     (6,012,433)     (1,850,699)  

Proceeds from the issuance of debt

  1,433,254   1,298,891   1,860,299    4,779,950     3,588,683     1,433,254  

Payments on debt

  (196,710)    (975,466)    (257,502)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (1,071,511)    163,318   (969,762)  

Net cash used in financing activities

   (337,817)     (2,365,622)     (1,071,511)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash

  3,142   1,121   (1,044)     (18,842)     (62,970)     3,142  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (75,262)    138,438   3,272    (140,437)     390,319     (75,262)  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  176,072   37,634   34,362    491,129     100,810     176,072  
 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $100,810  $176,072  $37,634   $350,692    $491,129    $100,810  

See Note 2321 for information on non-cash investing and financing activities and other information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

 

   December 31, 
    2012   2011 

ASSETS

  

Investments in real estate properties

   $        25,809,123    $        24,787,537 

Less accumulated depreciation

   2,480,660    2,157,907 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investments in real estate properties

   23,328,463    22,629,630 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   2,195,782    2,857,755 

Notes receivable backed by real estate

   188,000    322,834 

Assets held for sale

   26,027    444,850 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investments in real estate

   25,738,272    26,255,069 

Cash and cash equivalents

   100,810    176,072 

Restricted cash

   176,926    71,992 

Accounts receivable

   171,084    147,999 

Other assets

   1,123,053    1,072,780 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $27,310,145    $27,723,912 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

    

Liabilities:

    

Debt

   $11,790,794    $11,382,408 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   611,770    639,490 

Other liabilities

   1,115,911    1,225,548 

Liabilities related to assets held for sale

   18,334    20,992 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   13,536,809    13,268,438 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital:

    

Partners’ capital:

    

General partner - preferred

   582,200    582,200 

General partner - common

   12,486,817    13,079,439 

Limited partners

   51,194    58,613 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total partners’ capital

   13,120,211    13,720,252 

Noncontrolling interests

   653,125    735,222 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital

   13,773,336    14,455,474 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and capital

   $27,310,145    $27,723,912 

   December 31, 
    2014   2013 

ASSETS

  

Investments in real estate properties

   $    22,190,145    $20,824,477  

Less accumulated depreciation

   2,790,781     2,568,998  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investments in real estate properties

   19,399,364     18,255,479  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   4,824,724     4,430,239  

Assets held for sale

   43,934     4,042  

Notes receivable backed by real estate

        188,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investments in real estate

   24,268,022     22,877,760  

Cash and cash equivalents

   350,692     491,129  

Accounts receivable

   103,445     107,955  

Other assets

   1,096,064     1,095,463  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $25,818,223    $24,572,307  

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

    

Liabilities:

    

Debt

   $9,380,199    $9,011,216  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   627,999     563,993  

Other liabilities

   626,426     820,645  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   10,634,624     10,395,854  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital:

    

Partners’ capital:

    

General partner - preferred

   78,235     100,000  

General partner - common

   13,897,274     13,611,158  

Limited partners

   48,189     48,209  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total partners’ capital

   14,023,698     13,759,367  

Noncontrolling interests

   1,159,901     417,086  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital

   15,183,599     14,176,453  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and capital

   $25,818,223    $24,572,307  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 2011, 2010

(In thousands, except per unit amounts)

 

   2012  2011  2010 

Revenues:

   

Rental income

 $    1,495,202  $    1,030,670  $    549,605 

Rental recoveries

  374,022   264,202   150,500 

Private capital revenue

  126,779   137,619   122,526 

Development management and other income

  9,958   18,836   17,521 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  2,005,961   1,451,327   840,152 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenses:

   

Rental expenses

  505,499   358,559   199,199 

Private capital expenses

  63,820   54,962   40,659 

General and administrative expenses

  228,068   195,161   165,981 

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

  80,676   140,495     

Impairment of real estate properties

  252,914   21,237   736,612 

Depreciation and amortization

  739,981   552,849   294,867 

Other expenses

  26,556   24,031   16,355 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total expenses

  1,897,514   1,347,294   1,453,673 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  108,447   104,033   (613,521)  

Other income (expense):

   

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

  31,676   59,935   23,678 

Interest expense

  (507,484)    (468,072)    (461,166)  

Impairment of goodwill and other assets

  (16,135)    (126,432)    (412,745)  

Interest and other income, net

  22,878   12,008   15,847 

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

  305,607   111,684   28,488 

Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net

  (20,497)    41,172   (11,081)  

Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net

  (14,114)    258   (201,486)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

  (198,069)    (369,447)    (1,018,465)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

  (89,622)    (265,414)    (1,631,986)  

Current income tax expense

  17,870   21,579   21,724 

Deferred income tax benefit

  (14,290)    (19,803)    (52,223)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

  3,580   1,776   (30,499)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

  (93,202)    (267,190)    (1,601,487)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

   

Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale

  27,632   50,638   96,460 

Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges and taxes

  35,098   58,614   234,574 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

  62,730   109,252   331,034 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Consolidated net loss

  (30,472)    (157,938)    (1,270,453)  

Net loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (9,410)    4,175   (43)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to controlling interests

  (39,882)    (153,763)    (1,270,496)  

Less preferred unit distribution

  41,226   34,696   25,424 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common unitholders

 $(81,108)   $(188,459)   $(1,295,920)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common units outstanding - Basic

  461,848   371,730   219,515 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common units outstanding - Diluted

  461,848   371,730   219,515 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic:

   

Continuing operations

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)  

Discontinued operations

  0.14   0.29   1.51 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted:

   

Continuing operations

 $(0.32)   $(0.80)   $(7.41)  

Discontinued operations

  0.14   0.29   1.51 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted

 $(0.18)   $(0.51)   $(5.90)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Distributions per common unit

 $1.12  $1.06  $1.25 

    2014   2013   2012 

Revenues:

      

Rental income

  $    1,178,609    $    1,227,975    $    1,459,461  

Rental recoveries

   348,740     331,518     364,320  

Strategic capital income

   219,871     179,472     126,779  

Development management and other income

   13,567     11,521     9,958  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

   1,760,787     1,750,486     1,960,518  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expenses:

      

Rental expenses

   430,787     451,938     491,239  

Strategic capital expenses

   96,496     89,279     63,820  

General and administrative expenses

   247,768     229,207     228,068  

Depreciation and amortization

   642,461     648,668     724,262  

Other expenses

   23,467     26,982     26,556  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

             80,676  

Impairment of real estate properties

             252,914  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total expenses

   1,440,979     1,446,074     1,867,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   319,808     304,412     92,983  

Other income (expense):

      

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

   134,288     97,220     31,676  

Interest expense

   (308,885)     (379,327)     (505,215)  

Interest and other income, net

   25,768     26,948     22,878  

Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

   725,790     597,656     305,607  

Foreign currency and derivative losses and related amortization, net

   (17,841)     (33,633)     (20,497)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net

   (165,300)     (277,014)     (14,114)  

Impairment of other assets

             (16,135)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

   393,820     31,850     (195,800)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

   713,628     336,262     (102,817)  

Current income tax expense

   (61,584)     (126,180)     (17,870)  

Deferred income tax benefit

   87,240     19,447     14,290  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax benefit (expense)

   25,656     (106,733)     (3,580)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   739,284     229,529     (106,397)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

      

Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale

        6,970     40,827  

Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges and taxes

        116,550     35,098  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

        123,520     75,925  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

   739,284     353,049     (30,472)  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (100,900)     (8,920)     (9,410)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to controlling interests

   638,384     344,129     (39,882)  

Less preferred unit distributions

   7,431     18,391     41,226  

Loss on preferred unit redemption / repurchase

   6,517     9,108       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders

  $624,436    $316,630    $(81,108)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common units outstanding - Basic

   501,349     487,936     461,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common units outstanding - Diluted

   506,391     491,546     461,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic:

      

Continuing operations

  $1.25    $0.40    $(0.34)  

Discontinued operations

        0.25     0.16  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic

  $1.25    $0.65    $(0.18)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted:

      

Continuing operations

  $1.24    $0.39    $(0.34)  

Discontinued operations

        0.25     0.16  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted

  $1.24    $0.64    $(0.18)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Distributions per common unit

  $1.32    $1.12    $1.12  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Consolidated net loss

  $        (30,472)    $        (157,938)    $        (1,270,453)  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

   (79,014)     (192,591)     (45,248)  

Unrealized gain (loss) and amortization on derivative contracts, net

   17,986    (8,166)     (3,143)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   (91,500)     (358,695)     (1,318,844)  

Net loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (9,410)     4,175    (43)  

Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

   9,573    21,596    2,933 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to common unitholders

  $(91,337)    $(332,924)    $(1,315,954)  
    2014   2013   2012 

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

  $        739,284    $        353,049    $        (30,472)  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

   (171,401)     (234,680)     (79,014)  

Unrealized gains (losses) and amortization on derivative contracts, net

   (6,498)     19,590     17,986  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   561,385     137,959     (91,500)  

Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (100,900)     (8,920)     (9,410)  

Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

   12,666     12,261     9,573  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common unitholders

  $473,151    $141,300    $(91,337)  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

  General Partner  Limited Partners  Non-
controlling
Interests
  Total 
  Preferred  Common  Common   
   Units  Amount  Units  Amount  Units  Amount   

Balance as of January 1, 2010

  12,000      $  350,000    211,666      $  7,637,324           $       $  19,962       $8,007,286  

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

              (1,270,496)            43   (1,270,453)  

Issuance of units in exchange for contributions of equity offering proceeds

          41,069   1,087,284               1,087,284 

Effect of REIT’s common stock plans

          1,725   25,420               25,420 

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

          22   600           (600)      

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (42,315)            (2,933)    (45,248)  

Unrealized gain and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              (3,143)                (3,143)  

Costs of share-based compensation awards

              31,192               31,192 

Distributions

              (310,643)            (1,340)    (311,983)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

      12,000      $  350,000        254,482      $7,155,223           $       $  15,132       $7,520,355  

Consolidated net loss

              (153,414)        (349)    (4,175)    (157,938)  

Merger and PEPR Acquisition

  9,300   232,200   169,626   5,554,108   2,059   70,141   680,927   6,537,376 

Issuance of units in exchange for contributions of equity offering proceeds

          34,500   1,112,132               1,112,132 

Effect of REIT’s common stock plans

          793   2,398               2,398 

Capital contributions, net

                          94,020   94,020 

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (170,995)            (21,596)    (192,591)  

Unrealized loss and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              (8,166)                (8,166)  

Distributions and allocations

              (411,847)        (11,179)    (29,086)    (452,112)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

      21,300      $  582,200        459,401      $  13,079,439        2,059      $  58,613       $  735,222       $  14,455,474  

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

              (39,720)        (162)    9,410   (30,472)  

Adjustment to the Merger purchase price allocation

                          10,163   10,163 

Effect of REIT’s common stock plans

          2,258   72,932               72,932 

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

          111    2,381            (2,381)      

Capital contributions, net

                          74,447   74,447 

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

              (13,998)            (122,258)    (136,256)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (69,155)        (286)    (9,573)    (79,014)  

Unrealized gain and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              17,913       73       17,986 

Distributions and allocations

              (562,975)    (166)    (7,044)    (41,905)    (611,924)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

      21,300      $  582,200        461,770      $  12,486,817        1,893      $  51,194       $  653,125       $  13,773,336  

  General Partner  Limited Partners  Non-
controlling
Interests
  Total 
  Preferred  Common  Common   
   Units  Amount  Units  Amount  Units  Amount   

Balance at January 1, 2012

  21,300       $  582,200    459,401       $  13,079,439    2,059       $  58,613       $  735,222       $  14,455,474  

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

              (39,720)        (162)    9,410    (30,472)  

Adjustment to the Merger purchase price allocation

                          10,163    10,163  

Effect of equity compensation plans

          2,258    72,932                72,932  

Noncontrolling interests, issuances (conversions), net

          111    2,381            (2,381)      

Capital contributions, net

                          74,447    74,447  

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

              (13,998)            (122,258)    (136,256)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (69,155)        (286)    (9,573)    (79,014)  

Unrealized gains and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              17,913        73   ��    17,986  

Distributions and allocations

              (562,975)    (166)    (7,044)    (41,905)    (611,924)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

  21,300   $582,200    461,770   $12,486,817    1,893   $51,194   $653,125   $13,773,336  

Consolidated net earnings

              342,921        1,208    8,920    353,049  

Effect of equity compensation plans

          1,351    93,705                93,705  

Issuance of units in exchange for contribution of equity offering proceeds

          35,650    1,437,697                1,437,697  

Redemption of preferred units

  (19,300)    (482,200)        (515)                (482,715)  

Issuance of warrant by Prologis, Inc.

              32,359                32,359  

Capital contributions

                          146,130    146,130  

Settlement of noncontrolling interests

          28    (7,868)            (242,745)    (250,613)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (221,633)        (786)    (12,261)    (234,680)  

Unrealized gains and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              19,521        69        19,590  

Distributions and allocations

              (571,846)    (126)    (3,476)    (136,083)    (711,405)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  2,000   $100,000    498,799   $13,611,158    1,767   $48,209   $417,086   $14,176,453  

Consolidated net earnings

              636,183        2,201    100,900    739,284  

Effect of equity compensation plans

          1,383    88,438        450        88,888  

Issuance of units in exchange for contribution of at-the-market offering proceeds

          3,316    140,135                140,135  

Repurchase of preferred units

  (435)    (21,765)        (5,878)                (27,643)  

Issuance of units in exchange for proceeds from exercise of warrant

          6,000    213,840                213,840  

Formation of Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture

              13,721            442,251    455,972  

Consolidation of Prologis North American Industrial Fund

              12,507            554,493    567,000  

Capital contributions

                          14,464    14,464  

Settlement of noncontrolling interests

              33,803            (36,243)    (2,440)  

Foreign currency translation losses, net

              (167,950)        (548)    (12,666)    (181,164)  

Unrealized losses and amortization on derivative contracts, net

              (9,219)        (23)        (9,242)  

Distributions and allocations

              (669,464)        (2,100)    (320,384)    (991,948)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

  1,565   $78,235    509,498   $13,897,274    1,767   $48,189   $1,159,901   $15,183,599  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012

(In thousands)

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Operating activities:

            

Consolidated net loss

  $(30,472)    $(157,938)    $(1,270,453)  

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Consolidated net earnings (loss)

  $739,284    $353,049    $(30,472)  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Straight-lined rents

   (62,290)     (59,384)     (40,983)     (42,829)     (46,861)     (62,290)  

REIT stock-based compensation awards, net

   32,138    28,920    25,085 

Equity-based compensation awards

   57,478     49,239     32,138  

Depreciation and amortization

   767,459    603,884    356,694    642,461     664,007     767,459  

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

   (31,676)     (59,935)     (23,678)     (134,288)     (97,220)     (31,676)  

Distributions and changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities

   6,581    58,981    79,671 

Distributions and net changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities

   110,435     75,859     6,581  

Amortization of debt and lease intangibles

   21,008    43,556    79,538    21,113     10,140     21,008  

Non-cash Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

   17,581    20,290                   17,581  

Impairment of real estate properties and other assets

   269,049    147,669    1,149,357              269,049  

Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges, in discontinued operations

   (43,008)     (61,830)     (234,574)  

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

   (305,607)     (111,684)     (28,488)  

Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt, net

   14,114    (258)     201,486 

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains), net

   14,892    (38,398)     11,487 

Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

   (725,790)     (715,758)     (348,615)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net

   165,300     277,014     14,114  

Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains) and related amortization, net

   22,571     28,619     14,892  

Deferred income tax benefit

   (21,967)     (19,803)     (52,223)     (87,240)     (20,067)     (21,967)  

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash, accounts receivable and other assets

   (178,387)     (40,095)     63,701 

Increase in accounts receivable and other assets

   (93)     (12,912)     (178,387)  

Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (5,923)     (146,911)     (75,837)     (63,871)     (80,120)     (5,923)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   463,492    207,064    240,783    704,531     484,989     463,492  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Investing activities:

            

Real estate development activity

   (793,349)     (811,035)     (324,471)     (1,051,181)     (845,234)     (793,349)  

Real estate acquisitions

   (254,414)     (214,759)     (133,654)     (612,330)     (514,611)     (254,414)  

Tenant improvements and lease commissions on previously leased space

   (133,558)     (88,368)     (57,240)     (133,957)     (145,424)     (133,558)  

Non-development capital expenditures

   (80,612)     (55,702)     (28,565)     (78,610)     (82,610)     (80,612)  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities, net

   (165,011)     (37,755)     (335,396)  

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   (739,635)     (1,221,155)     (165,011)  

Return of investment from unconsolidated entities

   291,679    170,158    220,195    244,306     411,853     291,679  

Proceeds from dispositions of real estate properties

   1,975,036    1,644,152    1,642,986 

Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate and other notes receivable

   55,000    6,450    18,440 

Investments in notes receivable backed by real estate and advances on other notes receivable

        (55,000)     (269,000)  

Cash acquired in connection with the Merger

        234,045      

Acquisition of PEPR, net of cash received

        (1,025,251)       

Acquisition of NAIF II and other unconsolidated entities, net of cash received

   (365,156)            

Proceeds from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties

   2,285,488     5,409,745     1,975,036  

Acquisition of a controlling interest in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net of cash received

   (590,390)     (678,642)     (365,156)  

Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate

   188,000          55,000  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   529,615    (233,065)     733,295    (488,309)     2,333,922     529,615  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Financing activities:

            

Proceeds from issuance of common partnership units in exchange for contributions from the REIT, net

   30,981    1,156,493    1,162,461 

Distributions paid on common partnership units

   (528,226)     (388,333)     (280,658)  

Distributions paid on preferred units

   (47,581)     (26,965)     (25,416)  

Proceeds from issuance of common partnership units in exchange for contributions from Prologis, Inc.

   378,247     1,505,791     30,981  

Distributions paid on common and preferred units

   (674,344)     (580,862)     (575,807)  

Redemption of preferred units

   (27,643)     (482,500)       

Noncontrolling interest contributions

   70,820    123,924         468,280     145,522     70,820  

Noncontrolling interest distributions

   (41,905)     (16,178)     (1,610)     (313,272)     (113,928)     (41,905)  

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

   (136,256)               (2,440)     (245,803)     (136,256)  

Debt and equity issuance costs paid

   (10,963)     (77,241)     (76,580)  

Net proceeds from (payments on) Credit Facilities

   9,064    (37,558)     (246,280)  

Repurchase of debt

   (1,653,989)     (894,249)     (3,104,476)  

Debt and capital issuance costs paid

   (23,420)     (77,017)     (10,963)  

Net proceeds from (payments on) credit facilities

   (717,369)     (93,075)     9,064  

Repurchase and payment of debt

   (4,205,806)     (6,012,433)     (1,850,699)  

Proceeds from the issuance of debt

   1,433,254    1,298,891    1,860,299    4,779,950     3,588,683     1,433,254  

Payments on debt

   (196,710)     (975,466)     (257,502)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (1,071,511)     163,318    (969,762)  

Net cash used in financing activities

   (337,817)     (2,365,622)     (1,071,511)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash

   3,142    1,121    (1,044)     (18,842)     (62,970)     3,142  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (75,262)     138,438    3,272    (140,437)     390,319     (75,262)  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

   176,072    37,634    34,362    491,129     100,810     176,072  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $100,810   $176,072   $37,634   $350,692    $491,129    $100,810  

See Note 2321 for information on non-cash investing and financing activities and other information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1.Description of Business

On June 3, 2011, AMB Property Corporation (“AMB”) and AMB Property, L.P. completed the merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger with ProLogis, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ProLogis”) and its subsidiaries (the “Merger”). Following the Merger, AMB changed its name to Prologis, Inc. (the “REIT”). As a result of(or the Merger, each outstanding common share of beneficial interest of ProLogis was converted into 0.4464 of a newly issued share of common stock of the REIT. As further discussed in Note 3, AMB was the legal acquirer and ProLogis was the accounting acquirer. As such, in the Consolidated Financial Statements the historical results of ProLogis were included for the pre-Merger period and the combined results were included subsequent to the Merger. See Note 3 for further discussion on the Merger.

Prologis, Inc.“Parent”) commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997, elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Internal(the “Internal Revenue Code”), and believes the current organization and method of operation will enable the REITit to maintain its status as a real estate investment trust.REIT. The REITParent is the general partner of Prologis, L.P. (the(or the “Operating Partnership”). Through our controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, we are engaged in the ownership, acquisition, development and operation of industrial properties in global regional and other distributionregional markets throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our current business strategy includesis comprised of two reportableoperating business segments: Real Estate Operations and PrivateStrategic Capital. Our Real Estate Operations segment represents the long-term ownership of industrial properties. Our PrivateStrategic Capital segment represents the long-term management of co-investment ventures and other unconsolidated entities. See Note 2220 for further discussion of our business segments. Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both the REITParent and the Operating Partnership. The terms “the Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means the REITParent and Operating Partnership collectively.

AsFor each share of common stock or preferred stock the Parent issues, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding common or preferred partnership unit, as applicable, to the Parent in exchange for the contribution of the proceeds from the stock issuance. At December 31, 2012,2014, the REITParent owned an approximate 99.59%99.65% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, and 100% of the preferred units.units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 0.41%0.35% common limited partnership interests are owned by non-affiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of the REIT.Parent. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the REITParent has full, exclusive and complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership.

We operate the REITParent and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the REITParent consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of the REITParent and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its direct or indirect subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the REITParent consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, andPartnership. Since the REIT does not haveParent’s only significant assets other thanasset is its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore,Partnership, the assets and liabilities of the REITParent and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.

Information with respect to the square footage, number of buildings and acres of land is unaudited.

 

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are presented in our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. All material intercompany transactions with consolidated entities have been eliminated.

We consolidate all entities that are wholly ownedwholly-owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity and whether the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary through consideration of substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity.

For entities that are not defined as variable interest entities, we first consider whether Prologis iswe are the general partner or the limited partner (or the equivalent in such investments which are not structured as partnerships). We consolidate entities in which we are the general partner and the limited partners in such investmentsentities do not have rights which would preclude control. For entities in which we are the general partner but do not control the entity as the other partners hold substantive participating rights and/or kick-out rights we apply the equity method of accounting is applied.since as the general partner we have the ability to influence the venture. For joint ventures for which we are thea limited partner or our investment is in an entity that is not structured similar to a partnership, we consider factors such as ownership interest, voting control, authority to make decisions, and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners to determine if the presumption that the general partner controls the entity is overcome.partners. In instances where the factors indicate that we control the joint venture, we consolidate the entity.

Adjustments and Reclassifications. Rental recoveries,Certain amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Operations,for 2013 and cash used for real estate acquisition investing activities, included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2011 and 20102012 have been reclassified to conform to the 20122014 financial statement presentation. In addition, certain other amounts includedWe reclassified the balances in the accompanying consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013, for 2011derivative assets fromAccounts Receivable toOther Assets and 2010 have been reclassifiedfor derivative liabilities fromAccounts Payable and Accrued Expenses to conform toOther Liabilities. See Note 7 for the 2012 financial statement presentation.detail of these amounts.

Use of Estimates. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as ofat the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout thesethe Consolidated Financial Statements, different

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported results. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions and future changes in market conditions could impact our future operating results.

Foreign Operations. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in the United States and Mexico and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries that operate as holding companies for foreign investments. The

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in countries other than the United States and Mexico is the principal currency in which the entity’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses are denominated, which may be different from the local currency of the country of incorporation or the country where the entity conducts its operations.

The functional currencies of our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities generally include the Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, euro, Japanese yen, and Singapore dollar. We are parties to business transactions denominated in these and other currencies.local currencies where we operate.

For our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, we translate their financial statements into the U.S. dollarsdollar at the time we consolidate those subsidiaries’ financial statements. Generally, assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as ofat the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are included in theAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCI”) in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain balance sheet items, primarily equity and capital-related accounts, are reflected at the historical exchange rate. Income statement accounts are translated using the average exchange rate for the period and income statement accounts that represent significant non-recurring transactions are translated at the rate in effect as ofat the date of the transaction. We translate our share of the net earnings or losses of our unconsolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar at the average exchange rate for the period.

We and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany and third partythird-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss can result. The resulting adjustment is reflected in results of operations, unless it is intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature and then the adjustment is reflected in equity. The remeasurement results in the recognition ofas a cumulative translation adjustment inAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI.

We are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between certain foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. A significant change in the value of the foreign currency of one or more countries where we have a significant investment would have an effect on our reported results of operations and financial position. Although we attempt to mitigate adverse effects by borrowing under debt agreements denominated in the same functional currency as the investment and, on occasion and when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative contracts, there can be no assurance that those attempts to mitigate foreign currency risk will be successful.Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Business Combinations. When we acquire a business, which includesmay include an operating property, we record the acquisition at “fullthe fair value”.value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Transaction costs related to the acquisition of a business combinations are expensed as incurred. We generally acquire operating properties that meet the definition of a business. The transaction costs related to the acquisition of land and the formation of equity method investments continue to be capitalized, as these are not considered to be business combinations.capitalized.

When we acquire a business or individual operating properties, with the intention to hold the investment for the long-term,we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, which typically does not to exceed one year. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. A gain may be recognized to the extent the purchase price is less than the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired.

When we obtain control of an unconsolidated entity, we account for the acquisition of the entity in accordance with the guidance for a business combination achieved in stages. We measureremeasure our previously held interest in the unconsolidated entity at its acquisition-date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in earnings at the acquisition date.

We allocate the purchase price using primarily level 2 and level 3 inputs (further defined inFair Value Measurements)Measurementsbelow) as follows:

Investments in Real Estate Properties.IndustrialWe value operating properties are valued as if vacant.We estimate fair value generally by applying an income approach methodology using a discounted cash flow analysis. Key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis include origination costsmarket rents, growth rates and discount and capitalization rates. DiscountWe determine discount and capitalization rates are determined by market based on recent appraisals, transactions and other market data. The fair value of land is generally based on relevant market data, such as a comparison of the subject site to similar parcels that have recently been sold or are currently being offered on the market for sale.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities.We estimate the fair value of the entity by using similar valuation methods as those used for consolidated real estate properties and debt. We multiply the estimated net asset value of the entity by our ownership percentage to estimate the fair value of our investment.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Intangible Assets.We determine the portion of the purchase price related to intangible assets as follows:

 

  

In Place Leases.TheWe calculate the fair value of in place leases is calculated based upon our estimate of the costs to obtain tenants, primarily leasing commissions, in each of the applicable markets. The value is recorded in other assets and amortized over the average remaining estimated life of the lease to amortization expense.

 

  

Above and Below Market Leases. AnWe recognize an asset or liability is recognized for acquired leases with favorable or unfavorable rents based on our estimate of current market rents in each of the applicable markets. The value is recorded in either other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, and is amortized over the average remaining estimated life of the lease and charged to rental income.

 

  

Contracts to Provide Management Contracts.Services. The recognition ofWe calculate the value of existing investmentagreements to provide management agreements is calculatedservices by discounting future expected cash flows under the agreements.flows. The value is recorded as management contracts inOther Assetsin other assetsthe Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the remaining term of the contractagreement to amortization expense.

Debt. TheWe estimate the fair value of debt is estimated based on contractual future cash flows discounted using borrowing spreads and market interest rates that would be available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. In the case of publicly traded debt, we estimate the fair value is estimated based on available market data. Any discount or premium to the principal amount is included in the carrying value and amortized over the remaining term of the related debt using the effective interest method to interest expense.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Noncontrolling Interest.We estimate the portion of the fair value of the net assets owned by third parties based on the fair value of the consolidated net assets, principally real estate properties and debt.

Working Capital. TheWe base the fair value of all other assumedacquired assets and assumed liabilities is based on the best information available.

Fair Value Measurements. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). We estimate fair value using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize upon disposition. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels:

 

Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity hascan access at the ability to access.measurement date.

 

Level 2 — Observable inputs,Inputs other than quoted prices included inwithin Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable for the asset or can be corroborated by observable market data.liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by littlefor the asset or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.liability.

Long-Lived Assets.

Real Estate Assets. Real estate assets are carried at depreciated cost. CostsWe capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving real estate assets are capitalized as part of the investment basis of the real estate assets. Costs incurred in acquiring real estate properties andWe expense costs for making repairs and maintaining the real estate assets are expensed as incurred.

During the land development and construction periods of qualifying projects, we capitalize interest costs, insurance, real estate taxes and general and administrative costs of the personnel performing the development, renovation, and rehabilitation; if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to getready the asset ready for its intended use. Capitalized costs are included in the investment basis of real estate assets. When a municipal district finances costs we incur for public infrastructure improvements, we record the costs in real estate until we are reimbursed or we credit the reimbursement to our tenants through real estate taxes. We capitalize costs incurred to successfully originate a lease that results directly from and are essential to acquire that lease, including internal costs that are incremental and identifiable as leasing activities. Leasing costs that meet the requirements for capitalization are presented as a component of other assets.Other Assetsin the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

TheWe charge the depreciable portions of real estate assets are charged to depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over theirthe respective estimated useful lives. Depreciation commences atwhen the asset is ready for its intended use, which we define as the earlier of stabilization (defined as 90%(90% occupied) or one year after completion of construction. We generally use the following useful lives: 5five to 7seven years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements, on developed buildings, 30 years for operating properties acquired and 40 years for operating properties we develop. Investments that are locatedWe depreciate building improvements on tarmac, which is land owned by federal, state or local airport authorities, andparcels subject to ground leases are depreciated over the shorter of the investmentestimated building improvement life or the contractual term of the underlying ground lease. Capitalized leasing costs are amortized over the estimated remaining lease term. Our weighted average lease term based on square feet for all leases, in effect at December 31, 20122014, was seven years.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

We assess the carrying values of our respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of the assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review our assets for recoverability, weWe consider current market conditions, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques; including discountedWe measure the recoverability of the real estate asset by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flow models; quoted market values; and third party appraisals, where considered necessary.flows. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the long-lived assetreal estate property that we expect to hold is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property. We determine fair value through various valuation techniques; including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values, and third-party appraisals; where considered necessary. When we decide to sell an asset we compare the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on estimated selling price less costs to sell and recognize an impairment for any excess.

We estimate the future undiscounted cash flows based on our intent as follows:

 

(i)for real estate properties that we intend to hold long-term; including land held for development, properties currently under development and operating buildings; recoverability is assessed based on the estimated undiscounted future net rental income from operating the property and the terminal value;

 

(ii)for land parcels we intend to sell, recoverability is assessed based on estimated fair value;proceeds from disposition;

 

(iii)for real estate properties currently under development and operating buildings we intend to sell, recoverability is assessed based on proceeds from disposition that are estimated based on future net rental income of the property and expected market capitalization rates; and

 

(iv)for costs incurred related to the potential acquisition of land or development of a real estate property, recoverability is assessed based on the probability that the acquisition or development is likely to occur as ofat the measurement date.

The use of

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

We base projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan we use to manage our underlying business. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows, discount rates and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and our ultimateintent with regard to our investment intent that occuroccurs subsequent to our impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment of our real estate properties or the recognition of a gain or loss at time of disposal.

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill at the reporting unit level. We have $25.3 million of goodwill associated with our Private Capital segment in Europe. We perform an annual review of recoverability during the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable.long-lived assets.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.Sale. Discontinued operations represent a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. The results of operations of a component of our business or properties that have been classified as discontinued operations are also reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We classify a component of our business or property as held for sale when certain criteria are met, which are in accordance with GAAP. At such time, the respective assets and liabilities are presented separately on ourin the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciation is no longer recognized. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.

AssetsDiscontinued Operations. As discussed in theNew Accounting Pronouncementsbelow, beginning in 2014, only disposals of a component of an entity, or a group of components of an entity, representing a strategic shift in operations would be presented as discontinued operations. Under this guidance, none of our property dispositions qualified as discontinued operations in 2014. However, in 2013 and 2012 the results of operations for real estate properties sold during the reported periods or held for sale and properties disposedat the end of are considered discontinued operations if sold to a third party. Properties contributed or sold to entitiesthe reported periods were shown underDiscontinued Operations in which we maintain an ownership interest, act as manager or account for under the equity method are not considered discontinued operations due to our continuing involvement withConsolidated Statements of Operations following the properties.previous accounting standard.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. OurWe present our investments in certain entities are presented under the equity method. TheWe use the equity method is used when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the venture but do not have control of the entity. Under the equity method, we initially recognize these investments (including advances) are initially recognized in the balance sheet at our cost and arewhich would include deferred gains from the contribution of properties, if applicable. We subsequently adjustedadjust the accounts to reflect our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized, our share of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, distributions received deferred gains from the contribution of properties and certain other adjustments, as appropriate. When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we conclude it is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the equity investment at fair value.

Notes Receivable Backed by Real Estate. We hold certain investments in debt securities that are backed by real estate assets. We regularly review the creditworthiness of the entities with which we hold the note agreements and reduce the notes receivable balance by estimating an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The notes are also evaluated individually for impairment. We consider a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the agreement.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions, and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We invest our cash with high-credit quality institutions. Cash balances may be invested in money market accounts that are not insured. We have not realized any losses in such cash investments or accounts and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash consists primarily of escrows under secured mortgage agreements for taxes, insurance and certain other reserve requirements relating to the underlying collateral. In certain circumstances, the lender retains control over cash received for rental income for a period of three to six months prior to releasing it to us.

Financial Instruments. We may use certain types of derivative financial instruments for the purpose of managing certain foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risk. We reflect our derivative financial instruments at fair value and record changes in the fair value of these derivatives each period in earnings, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. To qualifySee Note 18 for hedge accounting treatment, generally the derivative instruments used for risk management purposes must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge (primarily interest rate swaps and net investment hedges) and, if a derivative instrument is utilized to hedge an anticipated transaction, the anticipated transaction must be probable of occurring. Derivative instruments meeting these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the contract or at the redesignation process, if applicable.

The unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of an effective hedge are recorded inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Lossfor the REIT and Partners’ Capitalfor the Operating Partnership. For hedges related to debt, these amounts are amortized to earnings over the remaining term of the hedged items. Changes in fair value of a net investment hedge remain in equity until the investment is substantially liquidated. The ineffective portion of a hedge, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings to the extent that the change in value of the derivative instrument does not perfectly offset the change in value of the item being hedged. We estimate the fair valuediscussion of our financial instruments through a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. Primarily, we use quoted market prices or quotes from brokers or dealers for the same or similar instruments. These values represent a general approximation of possible value and may never actually be realized.

Exchangeable Debt. For the convertibleOur exchangeable notes we issued in 2008 and 2007, we were required to separate the accounting for the debt and equity components as we have the ability to settle the conversion of the debt and conversion spread, at our option, in cash, common stock, or a combination of cash and stock. The liability and equity components of convertible debt are accounted for separately. The value assigned to the debt component is the estimated fair value at the date of issuance of a similar bond without the conversion feature, which results in the debt being recorded at a discount. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the estimated remaining life of the debt as additional non-cash interest expense. The carrying amount of the equity component is determined by deducting the fair value of the debt component from the initial proceeds of the convertible debt instrument as a whole. Under the terms of the issuance of the 2010 convertible notes, we were required to settle the conversion by issuance of common shares and therefore this accounting did not apply to these notes.

In connection with the Merger and the debt exchange offer in June 2011, all issuances of our convertible notes became exchangeable notes issued by the Operating Partnership thatand are exchangeable into common stock of the REIT. As a result, theParent. The accounting for the exchangeable senior notes now requiresrequired us to separate the fair value of the derivative instrument (exchange feature) from the debt instrument and account for it separately as a derivative. At each reporting period, we adjust the derivative instrument to fair value with the adjustment being recorded in earnings asForeign Currency Exchange and Derivative Gains (Losses),Losses and Related Amortization, Net and the derivative reflected inOther Liabilities. We continue to amortize the discount over the remaining term of the exchangeable notes.

Noncontrolling Interests. Noncontrolling interests represent the share of consolidated entities owned by third parties. We recognize the noncontrolling interests in entities that we consolidate but of which we do not own 100% by using each noncontrolling holder’s respective share of the estimated fair value of the net assets as ofat the date of formation or acquisition. Noncontrolling interest that was created or assumed as a part of a business combination is recognized at fair value as of the date of the transaction. Noncontrolling interest is subsequently adjusted for the noncontrolling holder’s share of additional contributions, distributions to noncontrolling holders and the noncontrolling holders’ proportionate share of the net earnings or losses of each respective entity. If we establish a new consolidated entity or contribute a property to or liquidate an existing consolidated entity in which we do not own 100% of the ownership interests, we reflect the difference in cash received or paid from the noncontrolling interests carrying amount as paid-in-capital with no gain or loss recognized.

Certain limited partnership interests issued by us in connection with the formation of a real estate partnership and as consideration in a business combination are exchangeable into our common stock. Common stock issued upon exchange of a holder’s noncontrolling interest is accounted for at our carrying value of the surrendered noncontrolling interest.interest, and any differences reflected inAdditional Paid-in-Capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Costs of Raising Capital. CostsWe treat costs incurred in connection with the issuance of both common stock and preferred stock are treated as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. CostsWe capitalize costs incurred in connection with the issuance or renewal of debt are capitalized in other assets, and amortizedamortize to interest expense over the term of the related debt. Costs associated with debt modifications are expensed when incurred.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).. For the REIT,Parent, we includeAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the Operating Partnership,Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI is included in partners’ capital in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any reference toAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCIin this document is referring to the component of stockholders’ equity for the REITParent and partners’ capital for the Operating Partnership.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Revenue Recognition.

Rental Income. We lease our operating properties to customers under agreements that are classified as operating leases. We recognize the total minimum lease payments provided for under the leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Generally, under the terms of our leases,

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

the majority of our rental expenses are recovered from our customers. We reflect amounts recovered from customers as revenue in the period that the applicable expenses are incurred. AWe make a provision for possible loss is made if the collection of a receivable balance is considered doubtful.

PrivateStrategic Capital Revenue.Income. PrivateStrategic capital revenueincome includes revenues we earn from the management services we provide to unconsolidated entities and certain third parties.entities. These fees are recognized as earned anddetermined in accordance with the terms specific to each arrangement and may include property and asset management fees or transactional fees for leasing, acquisition, construction, financing, legal and tax services provided. We may also earn promote paymentsincentive returns (we refer to these as promotes) based on third partythird-party investor returns over time.time, which may be during the duration of the venture or at the time of liquidation. We recognize these fees when they are earned, fixed and determinable. We report these fees inStrategic Capital Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, we may earn fees for services provided to develop properties within these ventures and those fees are reflected inDevelopment Management and Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a percentage of completion basis.

Gains (Losses) on DispositionDispositions of Investments in Real Estate. GainsWe recognize gains on the disposition of real estate are recorded when the recognition criteria have been met, generally at the time the risks and rewards and title have transferred and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. LossesWe recognize losses from the disposition of real estate are recognized when known.

When we contribute or sell a property to an unconsolidated entity in which we have an ownership interest, we do not recognize a portion of the gain realized. If a loss is realized it is recognized when known. The amount of gain not recognized, based on our ownership interest in the entity acquiring the property, is deferred by recognizing a reduction to our investment in the applicable unconsolidated entity. We adjust our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized in future periods to reflect the entities’ recorded depreciation expense as if it were computed on our lower basis in the contributed properties rather than on the entity’s basis.

When a property that we originally contributed to an unconsolidated entity is disposed of to a third party, we recognize the amount of the gain we had previously deferred, along with our proportionate share of the gain recognized by the unconsolidated entity. During periods whenIf our ownership interest in an unconsolidated entity decreases and the decrease is expected to be permanent, we recognize the amounts relating to previously deferred gains to coincide with our new ownership interest.

Rental Expenses. Rental expenses primarily include the cost of our property management personnel, utilities, repairs and maintenance, property insurance and real estate taxes.

PrivateStrategic Capital Expenses. These costsStrategic capital expenses include the property management expenses associated with the property-level management of the properties owned by our unconsolidated entities and the direct expenses associated with the asset management of the unconsolidated entities.co-investment ventures provided by our employees who are assigned to our Strategic Capital segment. In addition, in order to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale, all of our property management functions are provided by property management personnel who are assigned to our Real Estate Operations segment. These individuals perform the property-level management of the properties in our owned and managed portfolio including properties we consolidated and the properties we manage that are owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We allocate the costs of our property management to the properties we consolidate (included inRental Expenses) and the properties owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures (included inStrategic Capital Expenses) by using the square feet owned by the respective portfolios.

Stock-BasedEquity-Based Compensation. We account for stock-basedequity-based compensation by measuring the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. We recognize the cost of the entire award on a straight-linedstraight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, generally the vesting period.

Income Taxes. Prologis, Inc. commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997, elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code, and believes the current organization and method of operation will enable the REIT to maintain its status as a real estate investment trust. Under the Internal Revenue Code, real estate investment trustsREITs are generally not required to pay federal income taxes if they distribute 100% of their taxable income and meet certain income, asset and stockholder tests. If we fail to qualify as a real estate investment trustREIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a real estate investment trustREIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Even as a real estate investment trust,REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our own income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

We have elected taxable real estate investment trustREIT subsidiary (“TRS”) status for some of our consolidated subsidiaries. This allows us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for real estate investment trusts.REITs. Many of the foreign countries in which we have operations do not recognize real estate investment trustsREITs or do not accord real estate investment trustREIT status under their respective tax laws to our entities that operate in their jurisdiction. In the United States, we are taxed in certain states in which we operate. Accordingly, we recognize income tax expense for the federal and state income taxes incurred by our TRSs, taxes incurred in certain states and foreign jurisdictions, and interest and penalties associated with our unrecognized tax benefit liabilities.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

We evaluate tax positions taken in the financial statements on a quarterly basisConsolidated Financial Statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.

DeferredWe recognize deferred income taxes are recognized in certain taxable entities. For federal income tax purposes, certain acquisitions have been treated as tax-free transactions resulting in a carry-over basis in assets and liabilities. For financial reporting purposes and in accordance with purchase accounting, we record all of the acquired assets and liabilities at the estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. For our taxable subsidiaries, including international jurisdictions, we recognize the deferred income tax liabilities that represent the tax effect of the difference between the tax basis carried over and the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets at the date of acquisition. Any increases or decreases to the deferred income tax liability recorded in connection with these acquisitions, related to tax uncertainties acquired, are reflected in earnings.

If taxable income is generated in these subsidiaries, we recognize a benefit in earnings as a result of the reversal of the deferred income tax liability previously recorded at the acquisition date and we record current income tax expense representing the entire current income tax liability. If the reversal of the deferred income tax liability results from a sale or contribution of assets, the classification of the reversal to the Consolidated Statement of Operations is based on the taxability of the transaction. We record the reversal toDeferred Income Tax Benefit as a taxable transaction if we dispose of the asset. We record the reversal asGains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net as a non-taxable transaction if we dispose of the asset, as well as the entity that owns the asset.

Deferred income tax expense is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes) and the utilization of tax net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets. AWe provide for a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances that causes a change in the estimated realizability of the related deferred income tax asset is included in deferred tax expense.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Environmental Costs. We incur certain environmental remediation costs, including cleanup costs, consulting fees for environmental studies and investigations, monitoring costs, and legal costs relating to cleanup, litigation defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. CostsWe expense costs incurred in connection with operating properties and properties previously sold are expensed. Costssold. We capitalize costs related to undeveloped land are capitalized as development costs. Costscosts and include any expected future environmental liabilities at the time of acquisition. We include costs incurred for properties to be disposed are included in the cost of the properties upon disposition. We maintain a liability for the estimated costs of environmental remediation expected to be incurred in connection with undeveloped land, operating properties and properties previously sold that we adjust as appropriate as information becomes available.

Recently AdoptedNew Accounting Standards.Pronouncements.In September 2011,May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an accounting standard update that requires companies to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The update allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity’s events and circumstances,use a five step model to determine whether itwhen to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries. Under the model, a company will identify the contract, identify any separate performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test.satisfied. The new standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance wasin GAAP when it becomes effective for us on January 1, 2012 for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed.2017. We adopted thishave not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard and it did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.ongoing financial reporting.

In June 2011,April 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that eliminateschanged the option to present componentscriteria for classifying and reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures. Under the new guidance, only disposals of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as parta component of the changes in stockholders’ equity, and requires the presentationan entity, or a group of components of net incomean entity, representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have, or will have, a major effect on the organization’s operations and other comprehensive income either infinancial results. Examples of disposals that may meet the new criteria include a single continuous statementdisposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or in two separate but consecutive statements.a major equity method investment. In addition, the new guidance requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations and the disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not meet the criteria for discontinued operations. We early adopted this standard as ofprospectively for all disposals subsequent to January 1, 20122014. Prior to adoption, the results of operations for real estate properties sold or held for sale during the reported periods were shown underDiscontinued Operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 8). Going forward, we expect the majority of our property dispositions will not qualify as discontinued operations and it was effective on a retrospective basis. As this standard is for presentation purposes only, it had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.the results of the dispositions will be presented inIncome from Continuing Operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to amend the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to achieve further convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2012. See Note 20 for additional disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards. In FebruaryMarch 2013, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that requires disclosure of the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income. The disclosure requirements are effective for us on January 1, 2013, and we do not expect the guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2013, a final consensus was reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) and ratified by the FASB on the accounting for currency translation adjustment (“CTA”) when a parent sells or transfers part of its ownership interest in a foreign subsidiary.entity. When a company sells a subsidiary or group of assets that constitute a business while maintaining ownership of the foreign entity in which those assets or subsidiary reside, a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity is required in order for a parent entity to release CTA to earnings. However, for a company that sells all or part of its ownership interest in a foreign entity, CTA is released upon the loss of a controlling financial interest in a consolidated foreign entity or partial sale of an equity method investment in a foreign entity. The guidanceFor step acquisitions, the CTA associated with the previous equity-method investment is effective for us onfully released when control is obtained and consolidation occurs. We adopted this standard at January 1, 2014, and we doit did not expect the guidance to have a material impact on ourin the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that requires disclosures about offsetting and related arrangements to enable financial statements users to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position, including rights of setoff associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments. In January 2013, the FASB clarified that the guidance applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transaction that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria under GAAP or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The disclosure requirements are effective for us on January 1, 2013, and we do not expect the guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the scope of current U.S. GAAP. The update clarifies that the real estate sales guidance applies to the derecognition of in-substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt. That is, even if the reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest under the consolidation guidance, the reporting entity would continue to include the real estate, debt, and the results of the subsidiary’s operations in its consolidated financial statements until legal title to the real estate is transferred to legally satisfy the debt. This accounting standard update is effective for us on January 1, 2013, and we do not expect the guidance to impact our Consolidated Financial Statements.

3.Business Combinations

Merger of AMB and ProLogis

As discussed in Note 1, we completed the Merger on June 3, 2011. After consideration of all applicable factors pursuant to the business combination accounting rules, the Merger resulted in a reverse acquisition in which AMB was the “legal acquirer” because AMB issued its common stock to ProLogis shareholders and ProLogis was the “accounting acquirer” due to various factors, including the fact that ProLogis shareholders held the largest portion of the voting rights in the merged entity and ProLogis appointees represented the majority of the Board of Directors (“Board”). In our Consolidated Financial Statements, the period ended December 31, 2011 includes the historical results of ProLogis for the entire period presented, and the results of the merged company are included subsequent to the Merger.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

As ProLogis was the accounting acquirer, the calculation of the purchase price for accounting purposes is based on the price of ProLogis common shares and common shares ProLogis would have had to issue to achieve a similar ownership split between AMB stockholders and ProLogis shareholders. We estimated the fair value of the pre-combination portion of AMB’s share-based payment awards based on market data and, in the case of stock options, we used a Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of these awards as of the Merger date. An adjustment was made to equity for the vested portion while the unvested portion will be expensed over the remaining service period. The purchase price allocation reflects aggregate consideration of approximately $5.9 billion, as calculated below (in millions, except price per share):

ProLogis shares and limited partnership units outstanding at June 2, 2011 (60% of total shares of the combined company)

   571.4 

Total shares of the combined company (for accounting purposes)

   952.3 
  

 

 

 

Number of AMB shares to be issued (40% of total shares of the combined company)

   380.9 

Multiplied by price of ProLogis common share on June 2, 2011

  $15.21 
  

 

 

 

Consideration associated with common shares issued

  $5,794.1 

Add consideration associated with share based payment awards.

   62.4 
  

 

 

 

Total consideration of the Operating Partnership

  $        5,856.5 

The allocation of the purchase price requires a significant amount of judgment. The allocation was based on our valuation, estimates and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. The purchase price allocation is complete and adjustments recorded during the one year measurement period were not considered to be material to our financial position or results of operations. The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in millions):

Investments in real estate properties

  $        8,197.6 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   1,592.3 

Cash, accounts receivable and other assets

   691.3 

Debt

   (3,646.7)  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (420.5)  

Noncontrolling interests

   (557.5)  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price of the Operating Partnership

  $5,856.5 
3.Business Combinations

Acquisition of ProLogis European Propertiesa Controlling Interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund

During the second quarter of 2011,2014, we increased our ownership in Prologis North American Industrial Fund (“NAIF”) from 23.1% to 66.1% by acquiring the equity units from all but one partner for an aggregate of ProLogis European Properties (“PEPR”) through open market purchases and a mandatory tender offer. In May 2011, we settled our mandatory tender offer$679.0 million. This included the acquisition of $46.8 million on October 20, 2014 that resulted in our gaining control over NAIF, based on the acquisition of an additional 96.5 million ordinary units and 2.7 million convertible preferred units of PEPR. During allrights of the second quarterlimited partners, and therefore we began consolidating NAIF as of 2011,that date. When we made aggregate cash purchases totaling €715.8 million ($1.0 billion). We funded the purchases through borrowings under our global line of credit andacquire a new €500 million bridge facility, which was subsequently repaid with proceeds fromcontrolling interest in an equity offering in June 2011.

Upon completion of the tender offer,investment, we met the requirements to consolidate PEPR. In accordance with the accounting rules for business combinations, we markedremeasure our equity investment in PEPR from its carrying value to fair value, of approximately €486 million, which resulted in the recognition ofand as a result we may recognize a gain or loss. We recognized a gain of €59.6$201.3 million ($85.9 million). We refer to this transaction asinGains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Netin the “PEPR Acquisition”.Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value was primarily based on the trading price for our previously owned units and our acquisition price for the PEPR units purchased during the tender offer period.external valuations.

We have allocated the aggregateThe total purchase price representing the share of PEPR we ownedwas $1.1 billion, which included our investment in NAIF at the time of consolidation of €1.1 billion ($1.6 billion).consolidation. The allocation of the purchase price required a significant amount of judgment and was based on our valuation, estimates and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. The purchase price allocation is complete and adjustments recorded during the one year measurement period were not considered to be material to our financial position or results of operations. The allocation of the purchase price wasacquired, for which we used external valuations as follows (in millions):

Investments in real estate properties

  $        4,448.2 

Cash, accounts receivable and other assets

   251.4 

Debt

   (2,240.8)  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (698.2)  

Noncontrolling interests

   (133.7)  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $1,626.9 

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Pro forma Information (unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents our results as though the Merger and the PEPR Acquisition, as well as the equity offering in June 2011 that was used, in part, to repay the loans used to fund the PEPR Acquisition, had been consummated as of January 1, 2010. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations had the transactions been consummated at the beginning of the period indicated nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results. The pro forma information does not give effect to any cost synergies or other operating efficiencies that have resulted or could result from the Merger and also does not include any merger and integration expenses. The results for the year ended December 31, 2011 included approximately seven months of actual results for both the Merger and PEPR Acquisition, and pro forma adjustments for five months. Actual results in 2011 include rental income and rental expenses of the properties acquired through the Merger and PEPR Acquisition of $575.2 million and $154.4 million, respectively, of which $50.5 million of rental income and $11.9 million of rental expenses are included in discontinued operations.

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)  2011   2010 

Total revenues

  $    1,981,579   $    1,898,083 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

  $(70,988)    $(1,374,283)  

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - basic

  $(0.15)    $(3.24)  

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - diluted

  $(0.15)    $(3.24)  

These results include certain adjustments, primarily decreased revenues resulting from the amortization of the net asset from the acquired leases with favorable or unfavorable rents relative to estimated market rents, increased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the adjustment of real estate assets to estimated fair value and recognition of intangible assets related to in-place leases and acquired management contracts and lower interest expense due to the accretion of the fair value adjustment of debt.

Acquisitions of Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

On February 3, 2012, we acquired our partner’s 63% interest in and now own 100% of our previously unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis North American Industrial Fund II (“NAIF II”) and we repaid the loan from NAIF II to our partner for a total of $336.1 million. The assets and liabilities of this venture, as well as the activity since the acquisition date, have been included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In accordance with the accounting rules for business combinations, we marked our equity investment in NAIF II from its carrying value to the estimated fair value. The fair value was determined and allocated based on our valuation, estimates, and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. The preliminary allocation of net assets acquired is approximately $1.6 billion in real estate assets, $27.3 million of net other assets and $875.4 million in debt. We have not recorded a gain or loss with this transaction, as the carrying value of our investment was equal to the estimated fair value.appropriate. While the current allocation of the purchase price is substantially complete, the valuation of the real estate properties is still being finalized. We do not expect future revisions, if any, to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations. The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):

Investments in real estate properties

  $2,770,191  

Cash, accounts receivable and other assets

   132,261  

Debt

   (1,195,213)  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (70,226)  

Noncontrolling interests

   (554,493)  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $        1,082,520  

Our results of operations for 2014 include rental income and rental expenses of the properties acquired in the NAIF acquisition of $49.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively, offset by the impact of noncontrolling interests.

On February 22, 2012,2013 Acquisitions of Controlling Interests in Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

During 2013, we dissolved theacquired real estate from three unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis California and dividedventures through the portfolio equally with our partner. The net valueconclusion of the assets and liabilities distributed representedventure or the fair valueacquisition of our ownership interest in the co-investment venture on that date.partner’s interest. In accordanceconnection with the accounting rules for business combinations,these transactions, we markedremeasured our equity investment in Prologis California from its carrying value to the estimated fair value which resulted in a gainand recognized gains of $273.0 million. The gain is recorded$34.8 million inGains on Acquisitions and Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value was determined and allocatedprimarily based on external valuations.

On October 2, 2013, we acquired our valuation, estimates,partner’s 78.4% interest in the unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis SGP Mexico and assumptions ofconcluded the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities.venture. The preliminary allocation of net assets acquired is approximately $496.3was $409.5 million in real estate assets, $17.7properties and $4.0 million of net other assets and $150.0$158.4 million in debt. WhileAll properties acquired in this transaction were contributed in June 2014 to our new unconsolidated co-investment venture in Mexico, as discussed in Note 4.

On August 6, 2013, we concluded the currentunconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis North American Industrial Fund III. The venture sold 73 properties to a third party and we subsequently acquired the remaining properties through the purchase of our partner’s 80% ownership interest in the venture. The allocation of the purchase price is substantially complete, the valuation of thenet assets acquired was $519.2 million in real estate properties is being finalized. We do not expect future revisions, if any,and $22.0 million of net other assets. These properties were contributed in January 2014 to have a significant impact on our financial position orconsolidated venture in which we own 55% of the equity as discussed in Note 12.

In the second quarter of 2013, we concluded an unconsolidated co-investment venture in Japan.

The results of operations.operations for these properties were not significant in 2013.

2012 Acquisitions of Controlling Interests in Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

On November 30,In 2012, Prologis North American Properties Fund 1 (“Fund 1”) distributed real estatewe acquired all or a portion of the total properties based onin three of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in the United States, collectively the “2012 Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions.” As a result of the 2012 Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions, we remeasured our equity investments in these co-investment ventures to fair value to our partner. We acquired the remaining interest in Fund 1 for total consideration of $33.2 million. In accordance with the accounting rules for business combinations, we marked our equity investment in Fund 1 from its carrying value to the estimated fair value which resultedresulting in a gain of $21.2 million. The gain is recorded$286.3 million inGains on Acquisitions and Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Netin ourthe Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value was determined and allocatedprimarily based on our valuation, estimates, and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value, which consisted primarily of real estate and intangible assets of $117.0 million. While the currentexternal valuations. The allocation of the purchase price is substantially complete, the valuation of thenet assets acquired for these acquisitions was approximately $2.3 billion in real estate properties, is being finalized. We do not expect future revisions, if any, to have a significant impact on our financial position or results$50.3 million of operations.

We refer to these three transactions collectively as “Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions”.net other assets and $1.0 billion in debt. Our results for 2012 include rental income and rental expenses of the properties acquired in the 2012 Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions of $170.6 million and $42.5 million, respectively, of which $4.9 million of rental income and $0.9 million of rental expenses are included in discontinued operations.respectively.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

4.Dispositions

During 2012, we disposed of land, land subject to ground leases and 200 operating properties to third parties aggregating 27.2 million square feet, resulting in net proceeds of $1.7 billion and net gains of $83.2 million ($17.3 million in continuing operations and $65.9 million in discontinued operations).

During 2011 we disposed of land, land subject to ground leases and 94 operating properties to third parties aggregating 10.7 million square feet, resulting in net proceeds of $1.1 billion and net gains of $74.0 million ($9.5 million in continuing operations and $64.5 million in discontinued operations).

In December 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell a portfolio of United States retail, mixed-use and other non-core assets. The properties, owned directly or through equity interests, sold in the transaction included: four shopping centers, two office buildings, 11 mixed-use projects with related land and development agreements, two residential development joint ventures, a railway station and certain ground leases. In 2010, we recognized an impairment charge of $168.8 million related to this transaction and a gain of $4.4 million in 2011 when the sale of these assets was completed.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, we sold a portfolio of industrial properties and several equity method investments for gross proceeds of approximately $1.0 billion resulting in a net gain of $203.1 million ($66.1 million loss in continuing operations and $269.2 million gain in discontinued operations). The industrial portfolio included 182 properties aggregating 23 million square feet and the equity method investments included our 20% ownership interest in three co-investment ventures (ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI-VIII) and an investment in one of our other unconsolidated joint ventures that owned a hotel property.

5.Real Estate

Investments in real estate properties are presented at cost, and consist of the following as ofat December 31 (in(dollars and square feet in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   Square Feet /Acres (1)     No. of Buildings (1)   Investment Balance 

Industrial operating properties (1):

    
  2014   2013     2014   2013   2014   2013 

Industrial operating properties:

              

Improved land

  $5,317,123   $4,813,145    - -      - -        - -      - -     $4,227,637    $4,074,647  

Buildings and improvements

   17,291,125    16,739,403    282,282     267,097       1,607     1,610     14,407,815     13,726,417  

Development portfolio, including cost of land (2)

   951,643    860,531 

Land (3)

   1,794,364    1,984,233 

Other real estate investments (4)

   454,868    390,225 

Development portfolio, including land costs:

              

Pre-stabilized

   7,448     4,491       24     11     547,982     204,022  

Properties under development

   22,844     18,587       55     46     925,998     816,995  

Land

   9,017     9,747       - -      - -      1,577,786     1,516,166  

Other real estate investments (2)

             502,927     486,230  
  

 

   

 

             

 

   

 

 

Total investments in real estate properties

   25,809,123    24,787,537              22,190,145     20,824,477  

Less accumulated depreciation

   2,480,660    2,157,907              2,790,781     2,568,998  
  

 

   

 

             

 

   

 

 

Net investments in real estate properties

  $        23,328,463   $        22,629,630                 $        19,399,364    $        18,255,479  

 

(1)At December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had 1,853 and 1,797 industrial properties consisting of 316.3 million and 291.1 million square feet, respectively. Included at December 31, 2012 were 183 properties totaling $2.2 billion that were acquired in connection with the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions.Items indicated by ‘- -‘are not applicable.

 

(2)At December 31, 2012, the development portfolio consisted of 30 properties aggregating 13.2 million square feet under development and 15 properties aggregating 4.8 million square feet of pre-stabilized completed properties. At December 31, 2011, the development portfolio consisted of 26 properties aggregating 7.2 million square feet that were under development and four properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet that were pre-stabilized completed properties.

(3)Land consisted of 10,915 acres at December 31, 2012, and 10,723 acres at December 31, 2011, respectively, and included land parcels that we may develop or sell depending on market conditions and other factors.

(4)Included in other real estate investments were:are: (i) certain non-industrial real estate; (ii) our corporate office buildings; (iii) land parcels that are ground leased to third parties; (iv) certain infrastructure costs related to projects we are developing on behalf of others; (v) restricted funds(iv) land parcels that are held in escrow pending the completion of tax-deferred exchange transactions involving operating properties;leased to third parties; (v) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions; and (vi) costs related to future development projects, including purchase options on land; and (vii) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions.land.

At December 31, 2012, excluding our assets held for sale,2014, we owned real estate assets in the Americas (Canada, Mexico and the United States), Europe (Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) and Asia (China, Japan and Singapore).

Acquisitions

Real estate acquisition activity for the years ended December 31 was as follows (dollars and square feet in thousands):

    2014   2013   2012 

Acquisitions of properties from unconsolidated co-investment ventures

      

Number of industrial operating properties

   231     58     215  

Square feet

   45,663     16,319     46,277  

Real estate acquisition value

  $        2,770,191    $        1,141,128    $        2,294,892  

Gains on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest

  $201,319    $34,787    $286,335  

Acquisitions of properties from third parties

      

Number of industrial operating properties

   8     12     12  

Square feet

   1,004     3,262     1,622  

Real estate acquisition value

  $78,314    $146,331    $77,397  

The acquisitions of controlling interests in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is discussed in Note 3.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

Dispositions

DuringReal estate disposition activity for the yearyears ended December 31 was as follows (dollars and square feet in thousands):

    2014   2013   2012 

Continuing Operations

      

Contributions to unconsolidated co-investment ventures

      

Number of properties

   126     254     25  

Square feet

   25,247     71,503     4,784  

Net proceeds

  $        1,825,311    $        6,479,707    $        380,880  

Net gains on contributions

  $188,268    $555,196    $1,958  

Dispositions to third parties

      

Number of properties

   145            

Square feet

   19,856            

Net proceeds (1)

  $1,365,318    $177,273    $94,587  

Net gains on dispositions (1)

  $336,203    $7,673    $17,314  

Discontinued Operations

      

Number of properties

        89     200  

Square feet

        9,196     27,169  

Net proceeds from dispositions

  $    $608,286    $1,562,189  

Net gains from dispositions, including related impairment charges and taxes (2)

  $    $116,550    $35,098  

(1)Dispositions to third parties include land sales.

(2)We recorded $1.2 million and $0.2 million of income tax expense in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the disposition of properties in discontinued operations.

Detail of significant transactions with related parties (co-investment ventures)

In June 2014, we completed the initial public offering of FIBRA Prologis, a Mexican REIT, on the Mexican Stock Exchange. In connection with the offering, FIBRA Prologis purchased 177 properties aggregating 29.7 million square feet (12.6 million square feet related to wholly-owned properties, 7.6 million square feet from our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Fondo Logistico (“AFORES”) and 9.5 million square feet from our unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund). We received 287.3 million equity units of FIBRA Prologis (priced at Ps 27.00 ($2.09)) in exchange for our combined investments, resulting in a 45% ownership interest that we account for under the equity method. Based on this transaction, we recognized a gain on disposition of investments in real estate of $52.5 million; current tax expense of $32.4 million; deferred tax benefit of $55.5 million; and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest of $61.0 million.

In the first quarter of 2013, we completed the initial public offering of Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”), a publicly traded company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. NPR acquired a portfolio of 12 properties totaling 9.6 million square feet from us for an aggregate purchase price of ¥173 billion ($1.9 billion). As a result of this transaction, we recognized a gain of $337.9 million, net of a $59.6 million deferral due to our ongoing investment. The gain was recorded inGains on Acquisitions and Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Netin continuing operationsthe Consolidated Statements of $305.6 million, which included gainsOperations.

Also during the first quarter of $294.2 million related to the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions2013, we closed Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (“PELP”), a European joint venture with Norges Bank Investment Management (“NBIM”). The venture acquired a portfolio from us for approximately €2.3 billion ($3.0 billion) consisting of 195 properties and $11.4 million of gains principally related to contribution activity.

In 2012, we received cash proceeds of $381.9 million related to the contribution of 25 properties aggregating 4.848.7 million square feet in 11 European target global markets. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a gain of $1.8 million, net of a deferred gain due to three of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. See Note 6 for more details.

ongoing investment. In 2012, we acquired 227 operating properties aggregating 47.9 million square feet with total real estate value of $2.4 billion. This includes the acquisition of 24 operating properties from one of our other unconsolidated joint ventures for $92.5 million and 191 operating properties in connection with the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitionsclosing, a warrant NBIM received at signing to acquire six million shares of our common stock with a strike price of $35.64 became exercisable. We used a Black-Scholes pricing model to value the warrant and this value was included as discussedconsideration in Note 3.the overall result of the transaction. On December 12, 2014, NBIM exercised the warrant to receive six million shares of our common stock for an aggregate strike price of $213.8 million.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded impairment charges related to real estate properties and land. See Note 16 for further discussion on these impairment charges.

In December 2012 and February 2013, we announced the formation of two new co-investment ventures in Europe and Japan, respectively. We have 207 operating properties aggregating approximately $5.0 billion that we have or expect to contribute to these ventures in 2013. See Note 6 and 25 for more information.PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Lease Commitments

We have entered into operating ground leases as a lessee on certain land parcels, primarily on-tarmac facilities and office space with remaining lease terms of 1 to 6075 years. Buildings and improvements subject to ground leases are depreciated ratably over the shorter of the term of the related leases or the useful life of the real estate. Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as ofat December 31, 20122014, were as follows (in thousands):

 

2013

  $        37,680 

2014

   36,475  

2015

   34,971   $32,307  

2016

   29,569     30,237  

2017

   28,274     27,490  

2018

   25,896  

2019

   25,110  

Thereafter

   384,825     391,634  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $551,794   $        532,674  

Operating Lease Agreements

We lease our operating properties and certain land parcels to customers under agreements that are generally classified as operating leases. Our largest customer and 25 largest customers accounted for 1.6%1.9% and 18.7%19.5%, respectively, of our annualized base rentsnet effective rent at December 31, 2012.2014. We determine net effective rent at the beginning of a lease based upon total estimated cash to be received through the term of the lease on an annual basis. At December 31, 2012,2014, minimum lease payments on leases with lease periods greater than one year for space in our operating properties and leases of land subject to ground leases during each of the years in the five-year period ending December 31, 2017 and thereafter were as follows (in thousands):

 

2013

  $        1,304,476 

2014

   1,120,418 

2015

   909,425   $ 1,193,676  

2016

   702,224     1,025,162  

2017

   530,208    798,922  

2018

   601,492  

2019

   427,600  

Thereafter

   1,522,733    1,326,106  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $6,089,304   $        5,372,958  

These amounts do not reflect future rental revenues from the renewal or replacement of existing leases and exclude reimbursements of operating expenses. These reimbursements are reflected as rental recoveries and rental expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

6.5.Unconsolidated EntitiesInvestments

Summary of Investments

We have investments in entities through a variety of ventures. We co-invest in entities that own multiple properties with private capitalpartners and investors and provide asset and property management services to these entities. Weentities, which we refer to these entities as co-investment ventures. Our ownership interest in these entities generally ranges from 15-50%. These entities may be consolidated or unconsolidated, depending on the structure, our partner’s participation and other rights and our level of control of the entity. This note primarily details our investments in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. See Note 12 for more detail regarding our consolidated investments.

We also have other ventures, generally with one partner and that we do not manage, which we account for on the equity method. We refer to our investments in all entities accounted for under the equity method, both unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, collectively, as unconsolidated entities.

Our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated entities at December 31 are summarized below (in thousands):

    2014   2013 

Unconsolidated co-investment ventures

  $4,665,918    $4,250,015  

Other ventures

   158,806     180,224  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $        4,824,724    $        4,430,239  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

structure, our partner’s rights and participation and our level of control of the entity. This note details our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. See Note 13 for more detail regarding our consolidated investments.

We also have investments in joint ventures, generally with one partner and that we do not manage. We refer to our investments in the entities accounted for on the equity method, both unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other joint ventures, collectively, as unconsolidated entities.

Our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated entities as of December 31, are summarized below (in thousands):

    2012   2011 

Unconsolidated co-investment ventures

  $    2,013,080   $    2,471,179 

Other joint ventures

   182,702    386,576 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $2,195,782   $2,857,755 

Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

As of December 31, 2012, we had investmentsThe amounts recognized in and managed 11 unconsolidated co-investment ventures that own portfolios of operating industrial properties and may also develop properties.PrivateStrategic Capital RevenueIncome includes revenues we earn for the management services we provide to unconsolidated entities and certain third parties. These fees are recognized as earned and may include property and asset management fees or transactional fees for leasing, acquisition, construction, financing, legal and tax services. We may also earn promote payments based on the third party investor returns over time. In addition, we may earn fees for services provided to develop a building within an unconsolidated co-investment venture and those fees are reflected asDevelopment Management and Other Income Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

SummarizedOperations depend on the size and operations of the co-investment ventures. Our ownership interest in these ventures also impacts the equity in earnings we recognize. The co-investment venture information regardingrepresents the venture’s information (not our investments inproportionate share) prepared on a GAAP basis. The following tables are summarized information of the unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31, and for the three years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):31.

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated co-investment ventures:

      

Americas

  $(7,843)    $22,709   $(13,243)  

Europe

   31,174    25,709    28,024 

Asia

   2,372    908    (4,233)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total earnings (loss) from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net

  $        25,703   $        49,326   $        10,548 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Private capital revenue and other income:

      

Americas

  $68,142   $67,293   $61,159 

Europe

   37,173    45,758    54,834 

Asia

   19,870    14,149    758 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total private capital revenue

   125,185    127,200    116,751 

Development management and other income

   535    5,943    7,413 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total private capital revenue and other income

  $125,720   $133,143   $124,164 

We completed the Merger and PEPR Acquisition in the second quarter of 2011. During 2012, we also acquired the interests in three of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, all located in the Americas. Therefore, 2011 may not be comparable to 2012. See Note 3 for more information on these transactions.

Private Capital Revenue includes fees and incentives we earn for services provided to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures (shown above), as well as fees earned from other unconsolidated entities and third parties of $1.6 million, $10.4 million and $5.8 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(dollars and square feet in millions)  2014   2013   2012 

Americas:

      

Number of ventures

   3     4     6  

Number of properties owned

   590     709     801  

Square feet

   87.1     108.5     127.5  

Total assets

  $7,063    $8,014    $9,070  

Third-party debt

  $2,280    $2,999    $3,836  

Total liabilities

  $2,421    $3,177    $4,170  

Our investment balance (1)

  $1,537    $1,194    $1,112  

Our weighted average ownership (2)

   31.0%     22.7%     23.2%  

Europe:

      

Number of ventures

   4     4     3  

Number of properties owned

   636     571     312  

Square feet

   147.4     132.9     70.3  

Total assets

  $11,463    $11,819    $6,605  

Third-party debt

  $2,644    $2,998    $2,384  

Total liabilities

  $3,524    $4,114    $2,954  

Our investment balance (1)

  $2,773    $2,703    $723  

Our weighted average ownership (2)

   38.8%     39.0%     29.7%  

Asia:

      

Number of ventures

   2     2     2  

Number of properties owned

   52     43     44  

Square feet

   26.2     22.9     11.0  

Total assets

  $4,135    $4,032    $1,937  

Third-party debt

  $1,652    $1,715    $973  

Total liabilities

  $1,749    $1,899    $1,063  

Our investment balance (1)

  $356    $353    $179  

Our weighted average ownership (2)

   15.0%     15.0%     19.2%  

Total:

      

Number of ventures

   9     10     11  

Number of properties owned

   1,278     1,323     1,157  

Square feet

   260.7     264.3     208.8  

Total assets

  $22,661    $23,865    $17,612  

Third-party debt

  $6,576    $7,712    $7,193  

Total liabilities

  $7,694    $9,190    $8,187  

Our investment balance (1)

  $4,666    $4,250    $2,014  

Our weighted average ownership (2)

   32.0%     29.2%     25.1%  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

(in millions)  2014 (3)   2013 (3)   2012 

Americas:

      

Revenues

  $711    $702    $759  

Net operating income

  $527    $513    $561  

Net earnings (loss)

  $54    $58    $(88)  

Europe:

      

Revenues

  $1,001    $801    $490  

Net operating income

  $787    $621    $380  

Net earnings

  $268    $131    $86  

Asia:

      

Revenues

  $280    $224    $141  

Net operating income

  $219    $175    $109  

Net earnings

  $86    $48    $8  

Total:

      

Revenues

  $1,992    $1,727    $1,390  

Net operating income

  $1,533    $1,309    $1,050  

Net earnings

  $408    $237    $6  

(1)The difference between our ownership interest of the venture’s equity and our investment balance results principally from three types of transactions: (i) deferring a portion of the gains we recognize from a contribution of a property to the venture ($322.9 million, $139.6 million and $147.9 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively); (ii) recording additional costs associated with our investment in the venture; and (iii) advances to the venture.

(2)Represents our weighted average ownership interest in all co-investment ventures based on each entity’s contribution to total assets, before depreciation, net of other liabilities.

(3)We had significant activity with our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in 2014 and 2013. As described above, we formed and invested in FIBRA Prologis in June 2014. In connection with this transaction, we concluded our unconsolidated co-investment venture in Mexico. During 2013, we concluded three co-investment ventures and we started two new co-investment ventures.

Summarized information regarding the amounts we recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as our share of the earnings from our investments in unconsolidated co-investment ventures for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):

 

    2014   2013   2012 

Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated co-investment ventures:

      

Americas

  $8,596    $21,724    $(7,843)  

Europe

   108,430     63,839     31,174  

Asia

   14,022     9,091     2,372  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total earnings from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net

  $131,048    $94,654    $25,703  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Strategic capital and other income:

      

Americas

  $94,354    $70,642    $68,142  

Europe

   86,487     63,794     37,173  

Asia

   37,509     42,749     19,870  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total strategic capital income

   218,350     177,185     125,185  

Development management and other income

   5,424     4,007     535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total strategic capital and other income

  $        223,774    $    181,192    $        125,720  

We may earn promotes based on the third-party investor returns over time. In June 2014, we earned a promote of $42.1 million from Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund, which was based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investors over the last three years. In October 2013, we earned a promote of $7.9 million in connection with the conclusion of SGP Mexico, which was based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investor over the life of the venture. We recognized the third-party investors’ portion of the promote of $31.3 million and $6.4 million

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

in 2014 and 2013, respectively, which is reflected inStrategic Capital Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We also recognized $4.2 million and $1.3 million of expense in 2014 and 2013, respectively that is reflected inStrategic Capital Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and represents the associated cash bonus paid pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan. See Note 13 for more information about this plan.

Information about our investments in the individual co-investment ventures as ofat December 31 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

   Number of
properties
owned
   Square
feet
(in millions)
   Ownership
Percentage
   Investment in
and Advances to
 
Co-Investment Venture  2012   2012   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Prologis California (Prologis California I LLC) (1)

                  50.0 %    $    $83,994 

Prologis North American Properties Fund I (“Fund I”)
(Prologis North American Properties Fund I LLC) (1)

                  41.3 %          33,194 

Prologis North American Properties Fund
XI (KPJV, LLP) (2)

                  20.0 %          29,868 

Prologis North American Industrial Fund (3)

   243    47.3    23.1 %     23.1 %     209,580    219,160 

Prologis North American Industrial Fund II (“NAIF II”)
(Prologis NA2 LP) (1)

                  37.0 %          335,397 

Prologis North American Industrial Fund III (“Prologis NAIII”),
(Prologis NA3 LP) (4)

   91    17.7    20.0 %     20.0 %     20,860    26,066 

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (“USLF”)
(Prologis U.S. Logistics Fund, LP) (5)

   366    44.4    23.9 %     27.5 %     645,241    665,594 

Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund (Prologis MX Fund LP) (6)

   74    9.5    20.0 %     20.0 %     50,681    52,243 

Prologis SGP Mexico (Prologis-SGP Mexico, LLC) (4)

   26    6.4    21.6 %     21.6 %     33,245    36,794 

Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund (“Brazil Fund”) and related joint ventures (“Brazil Ventures”) (7)

   7    2.2    50.0 %     50.0 %     152,224    113,985 

Prologis European Properties Fund II (“PEPF II”) (8)

   224    55.3    29.7 %     29.7 %     398,291    404,298 

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund (“PTELF”)
(Prologis Europe Logistics Fund, FCP-FIS) (9)

   74    11.9    32.4 %     31.5 %     280,430    245,859 

Europe Logistics Venture 1 (Europe
Logistics JV, FCP-FIS) (4)(10)

   14    3.1    15.0 %     15.0 %     44,027    11,853 

Prologis Japan Fund 1 (Prologis Japan Fund I, LP) (11)

   26    7.3    20.0 %     20.0 %     144,352    180,999 

Prologis China Logistics Venture 1 (Prologis China
Logistics Venture I, LP) (4)

   18    3.8    15.0 %     15.0 %     34,149    31,875 
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

           1,163            208.8             $  2,013,080   $  2,471,179 
   Ownership
Percentage
   Investment in
and Advances to
 
Co-Investment Venture  2014   2013   2014   2013 

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund, L.P.

   24.3%     25.9%    $712,044    $743,454  

Prologis North American Industrial Fund, LP (NAIF) (1)

        23.1%          201,482  

FIBRA Prologis (2) (3)

   45.9%          589,627       

Prologis MX Fund LP (Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund) (2)

        20.0%          49,684  

Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I, L.P. (“Brazil Fund”) and related joint ventures (“Brazil Ventures”) (4)

   50.0%     50.0%     235,496     199,392  

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund, FCP-FIS

   43.2%     43.1%     458,702     471,896  

Prologis European Properties Fund II, FCP-FIS

   31.1%     32.5%     488,503     582,828  

Europe Logistics Venture 1, FCP-FIS (5)

   15.0%     15.0%     56,127     62,654  

Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (PELP) (5)

   50.0%     50.0%     1,769,720     1,585,923  

Nippon Prologis REIT (NPR) (6)(7)

   15.1%     15.1%     303,178     309,715  

Prologis China Logistics Venture I, LP & II, LP (Prologis China Logistics Venture) (5)

   15.0%     15.0%     52,521     42,987  
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

            $  4,665,918    $  4,250,015  

 

(1)In 2012,As discussed in Note 3, we concluded this co-investment venture. For additional information on this transaction see Note 3.began consolidating NAIF in October 2014.

 

(2)WeAs discussed in Note 4, we completed the initial public offering of FIBRA Prologis in June 2014 and concluded this co-investment venture by disposingthe Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund. At December 31, 2014, we owned 291.1 million units of FIBRA Prologis, which had a closing price of Ps 27.29 ($1.86) per unit on the remaining asset in this venture during 2012.Mexican Stock Exchange.

 

(3)We referhave granted FIBRA Prologis a right of first refusal with respect to the combined entitiesstabilized properties that we plan to sell in which we have an ownership interest with nine institutional investors as one unconsolidated co-investment venture named Prologis North American Industrial Fund. Our ownership percentage is based on our levels of ownership interest in these different entities. During 2012, the venture disposed of 12 properties for a loss of $13.5 million.Mexico.

 

(4)We have one partner in each of these co-investment ventures.

(5)We have an ownership interest in this co-investment venture along with numerous third party investors. During 2012, this venture disposed of nine properties for a gain of $2.1 million. In addition, this venture acquired 26 properties aggregating 3.1 million square feet with capital of $201.6 million called from third party investors, which reduced our ownership in this venture.

(6)We refer to the combined entities in which we have ownership interests as one co-investment venture named Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund, which was formed with several institutional investors.

(7)We have a 50% ownership interest in and consolidate an entity that in turn owns 50% of several entities that we account for on the equity method (the “Brazil Fund”).method. Also, we have additional investments in other unconsolidated entities in Brazil that we account for on the equity method with various ownership interests ranging from 5-50%. We refer to the Brazil Fund and the other unconsolidated entities collectively as the “Brazil Ventures.” The Brazil Ventures develop and operate industrial properties in Brazil.

 

(8)(5)We have an ownership interestone partner in thiseach of these co-investment venture along with numerous third party investors. During 2012,ventures.

(6)At December 31, 2014, we contributed 13owned 261,310 units of NPR, which had a closing price of ¥260,600 ($2,179) per share on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had receivables from NPR of $85.9 million and $88.5 million, respectively, related to customer security deposits that originated through a leasing company owned by us that pertain to properties aggregating 2.2 million square feet for total proceeds of $185.9 million. Additionally, this venture acquired fourowned by NPR. We have a corresponding payable to NPR’s customers inOther Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(7)For any properties from third partieswe develop and plan to sell in 2012 for $36.3 million aggregating 0.7 million square feet and disposed of 11Japan, we are committed to offer those properties for a gain of $3.7 million.to NPR.

Equity Commitments Related to Certain Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. The venture may obtain financing for the properties and therefore the acquisition price of additional investments that the venture could make may be more than the equity commitment. Depending on market conditions, the investment objectives of the ventures, our liquidity needs and other factors, we may make additional contributions of properties and/or additional cash investments in these ventures through the remaining commitment period.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

(9)We have an ownership interest in this co-investment venture along with 20 third party investors. During 2012, we contributed three properties aggregating 0.6 million square feet in exchange for $47.4 million in proceeds raised from third parties and additional ownership interests in the venture. As a result, our ownership percentage in this venture increased in 2012. Also during 2012, the venture disposed of three properties for a loss of $1.7 million.

(10)During 2012, this co-investment venture acquired two properties aggregating 0.4 million square feet for $24.0 million from a third party with proceeds from commitments previously called in 2011. Also during 2012, the venture called capital of $178.6 million, of which $26.8 million was our share, in order to acquire nine properties from us aggregating 1.9 million square feet for proceeds of $148.5 million and one property from a third party aggregating 0.4 million square feet for $25.8 million.

(11)We have an ownership interest in this co-investment venture along with various third party investors.

On December 20, 2012 we announced the signing of a definitive agreement for the formation of Prologis European Logistics Partners (“PELP”) with Norges Bank Investment Management (“NBIM”). We will have a 50% ownership interest in PELP that we will account for under the equity method of accounting. NBIM will have equity commitments of €1.2 billion ($1.6 billion). The venture has an initial term of 15 years, which may be extended for an additional 15 year period. Prologis will have the ability to reduce its ownership to 20% following the second anniversary of closing. Upon the closing of PELP (which is expected to be in the first quarter of 2013), the venture will acquire 195 operating properties from us. In connection with the signing of the transaction, NBIM received a warrant to acquire six million shares of Prologis common stock with a strike price of $35.64, which we expect to become exercisable upon closing of the transaction.

On February 14, 2013, we formed a new co-investment venture in Japan in which we contributed twelve properties for an aggregate purchase price of ¥173 billion ($1.9 billion). See Note 25 for more details.

The following is summarized financial information of the unconsolidated co-investment ventures and our investment (dollars in millions). The co-investment venture information represents 100% of Prologis’ stepped up basis, not our proportionate share, and may not be comparable to values reflected in the entities’ stand alone financial statements calculated on a different basis.

2012 (1)  Americas   Europe   Asia   Total 

Revenues

  $759.3   $489.8   $140.5   $1,389.6 

Net earnings (loss) (2)

  $(72.4)    $85.7   $8.2   $21.5 

Total assets

  $      9,070.4   $      6,605.2   $      1,937.0   $    17,612.6 

Amounts due to us (3)

  $31.9   $33.3   $7.7   $72.9 

Third party debt (4)

  $3,835.5   $2,384.2   $972.9   $7,192.6 

Total liabilities

  $4,170.4   $2,953.8   $1,062.5   $8,186.7 

Noncontrolling interest

  $1.4   $7.5   $    $8.9 

Co-investment ventures’ equity

  $4,898.6   $3,643.9   $874.5   $9,417.0 

Our weighted average ownership (5)

   23.2 %     29.7 %     19.2 %     25.1 %  

Our investment balance (6)

  $1,111.8   $722.8   $178.5   $2,013.1 

Deferred gains, net of amortization (7)

  $147.9   $181.6   $0.1   $329.6 
2011 (1)  Americas   Europe   Asia   Total 

Revenues

  $871.8   $600.1   $95.5   $1,567.4 

Net earnings (loss) (2)

  $(23.8)    $73.6   $(0.5)    $49.3 

Total assets

  $12,236.0   $6,211.8   $2,245.1   $20,692.9 

Amounts due to us (3)

  $59.5   $8.1   $9.3   $76.9 

Third party debt (4)

  $5,952.8   $2,275.8   $1,061.4   $9,290.0 

Total liabilities

  $6,386.4   $2,758.9   $1,174.0   $10,319.3 

Noncontrolling interest

  $1.7   $6.2   $    $7.9 

Co-investment ventures’ equity

  $5,847.9   $3,446.7   $1,071.1   $10,365.7 

Our weighted average ownership (5)

   28.2 %     29.9 %     19.4 %     27.9 %  

Our investment balance (6)

  $1,596.3   $662.0   $212.9   $2,471.2 

Deferred gains, net of amortization (7)

  $227.6   $191.0   $0.1   $418.7 

(1)

During 2012, we concluded three of our co-investment ventures in the Americas whose results are included in both periods through the transaction date (see Note 3 for further details). Amounts presented for 2011 reflect the acquisition of seven ventures in the Merger,

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

offset by PEPR, which is now consolidated. Amounts include approximately seven months of activity in 2011 from the investments acquired through the Merger and five months of activity for PEPR.

(2)In 2012, five ventures in the Americas recorded net gains of $9.4 million from the disposition of 38 properties. During 2012, Prologis NAIII wrote off accumulated other comprehensive loss due to the settlement of debt before maturity by transferring the secured properties to the lender in lieu of payment for $25.1 million (Prologis share was $5.0 million) and the settlement of interest rate swap agreements in which the related debt is no longer expected to reach maturity for $21.5 million (Prologis share was $4.3 million).

Included in 2011 net earnings (loss) in Americas is a net gain of $17.1 million from the disposition of 21 properties by two ventures. Also included in net earnings (loss) in Americas is a loss of $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 due to the impairment of two operating buildings in two of the ventures. Included in the net earnings (loss) in Europe is a gain of $6.4 million from the acquisition of a property by one of our co-investment ventures.

(3)As of December 31, 2012, we had one note receivable from Prologis SGP Mexico of $19.7 million. As of December 31, 2011, we had notes receivable aggregating $41.2 million from Prologis NAIII ($21.4 million) and Prologis SGP Mexico ($19.8 million). In February 2012, the note receivable to us and loan from Prologis North American Industrial Fund III payable to our partner were restructured into equity according to our ownership percentages. The remaining amounts represent current balances from services provided by us to the venture.

(4)As discussed in Note 3, debt was reduced by $1.4 billion related to the conclusion of three unconsolidated co-investment ventures during 2012. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we guaranteed $30.4 million and $28.0 million, respectively, of the third party debt of certain unconsolidated ventures. As of December 31, 2011, we had pledged properties included in our Real Estate Operations segment with an undepreciated cost of approximately $277.0 million, to serve as additional collateral for the secured mortgage loan of NAIF II payable to an affiliate of our venture partner. In connection with the acquisition of our partner’s interest in February 2012, we repaid this loan, and these assets are no longer pledged.

(5)Represents our weighted average ownership interest in all co-investment ventures based on each entity’s contribution to total assets, before depreciation, net of other liabilities.

(6)The difference between our ownership interest of the venture’s equity and our investment balance results principally from three types of transactions: (i) deferring a portion of the gains we recognize from a contribution of one of our properties to the venture (see next sub-footnote); (ii) recording additional costs associated with our investment in the venture; and (iii) advances to the venture.

(7)This amount is recorded as a reduction to our investment and represents the gains that were deferred when we contributed a property to a venture due to our continuing ownership in the property.

Equity Commitments Related to Certain Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures

Certain unconsolidated co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We are committed to offer to contribute certain properties that we develop and stabilize in select markets in Europe and Mexico to certain ventures. These ventures are committed to acquire such properties, subject to certain exceptions, including that the properties meet certain specified leasing and other criteria, and that the ventures have available capital. We are not obligated to contribute properties at a loss. Depending on market conditions, the investment objectives of the ventures and other factors, we may make contributions of properties to these ventures through the remaining commitment period.

The following table is a summary of remaining equity commitments as ofat December 31, 20122014 (in millions):

 

    Equity commitments   Expiration date for remaining
commitments

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (1)

    

Prologis

  $    Open-Ended (1)

Venture Partners

  $30.0   
  

 

 

Prologis SGP Mexico (2)

    

Prologis

  $24.6   (2)

Venture Partner

  $98.1   
  

 

 

Europe Logistics Venture 1 (3)

    

Prologis

  $54.5   February 2014

Venture Partner

  $309.0   
  

 

 

Prologis China Logistics Venture 1

    

Prologis

  $68.6   March 2015

Venture Partner

  $388.7   
  

 

 

Total

    

Prologis

  $147.7   

Venture Partners

  $825.8    

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

   Equity commitments   Expiration date
for remaining
commitments
 
    Prologis   Venture
Partners
   Total   

Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund

  $   $376    $376     2015-2017  

Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund (1)

   117     197     314     June 2015  

Prologis European Properties Fund II (1)

   46     106     152     September 2015  

Europe Logistics Venture 1 (1)

   4     21     25     June 2015  

Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (2)

   104     104     208     February 2016  

Prologis China Logistics Venture (3)

   225     1,277     1,502     2015 and 2017  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

  $496    $2,081    $    2,577       

 

(1)We secured $295.5 million in commitments from third parties in 2012 in order to fund future acquisitions from us and third parties that meet the venture’s investment strategy, or to pay down existing debt. During 2012, the venture called capital of $265.5 million from these investors primarily to fund third party acquisitions.

(2)These equity commitments will be called only if needed to pay outstanding debt of the venture. The relevant debt was due in 2012, which was automatically extended until the third quarter of 2013. There is also an option to extend until the third quarter of 2014.

(3)Equity commitments are denominated in euro and reported above in U.S. dollar. During 2012,dollars based on an exchange rate of 1.21 U.S. dollars to the euro.

(2)The equity commitments for this venture acquired two buildings from third parties with capital previously called. Also during 2012, this venture called capital of €136.0 million ($178.6 million) of which €20.4 million ($26.8 million) represented our shareare expected to fund the contributionfuture repayment of nine buildings from usdebt that is denominated in British pounds sterling. The commitments will be called in euros and are reported above in U.S. dollars using an exchange rate of 1.56 U.S. dollars to the acquisition of one building from a third party.British pounds sterling.

To the extent an unconsolidated entity acquires properties from a third party or requires cash to retire debt or has other cash needs, we may be required or agree to contribute our proportionate share of the equity component in cash to the unconsolidated entity.

(3)In July 2014, we secured a $500 million increase in committed third-party equity for this venture.

Other joint venturesVentures

We have acquired several investments in other unconsolidated joint ventures that own real estate properties and/or perform development activity. We recognized our proportionate share of the earnings from our investments in these entities of $3.2 million, $2.6 million and have summarized this information$6.0 million for the years ended December 31, as follows (in thousands):

    2012   2011   2010 

Americas

  $        1,842   $        5,239   $        6,502 

Europe

   2,606    2,161    4,861 

Asia

   1,525    3,209    1,767 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total earnings from other joint ventures

  $5,973   $10,609   $13,130 

Our investments in2014, 2013 and advances to these entities as of December 31 was as follows (in thousands):2012, respectively.

    2012   2011 

Americas (1)

  $        106,655   $        305,352 

Europe

   48,503    50,474 

Asia

   27,544    30,750 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $182,702   $386,576 

(1)During the second quarter of 2012, we received $95.0 million, which represented a return of capital from one of our joint ventures that held a note receivable that was repaid in full during the quarter. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we dissolved one joint venture and divided the portfolio according to the ownership of the partners. The investment in this entity prior to dissolution was $80.8 million.

 

7.6.Notes Receivable Backed by Real Estate

The activity on theAt December 31, 2013, we had $188.0 million of notes receivable backed by real estate that represented an investment in a preferred equity interest made in 2010 through the sale of a portfolio of industrial properties. We earned a preferred return at an annual rate of 7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 was as follows (in thousands):

    

$188 million
Preferred

Equity Interest (1)

   

$55 million
Preferred

Equity Interest (2)

   

NAIF II

Secured Mortgage
Receivable (3)

   Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $188,000   $55,970   $78,864   $            322,834 

Elimination upon acquisition of NAIF II

             (78,864)     (78,864)  

Principal payment received

        (55,000)          (55,000)  

Accrued interest, net of interest payments received

        (970) ��        (970)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

  $188,000   $    $    $188,000 

(1)

The balance represents an investment in a preferred equity interest made in 2010 through a sale of a portfolio of industrial properties. Based on the terms of this instrument, the preferred equity interest meets the definition of an investment in a debt security from an accounting perspective. We earn a preferred return at an annual rate of 7% for the first three years, 8% for the fourth year and 10%

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

first three years and 8% for the fourth year. In the second quarter of 2014, the notes and all accrued interest were paid in full.

 

thereafter until redeemed. Partial or full redemption can occur at any time at the buyer’s discretion or after the five year anniversary at our discretion.

(2)The balance as of December 31, 2011 represented an investment in a preferred equity interest made in 2011 through a sale of a portfolio of retail, mixed-use and other non-core assets. Based on the terms of this instrument, the preferred equity interest met the definition of an investment in a debt security from an accounting perspective. We earned a preferred return at an annual rate of 7%. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we received a repayment of the outstanding balance.

(3)The balance as of December 31, 2011 represented a loan to NAIF II secured by 12 buildings. In February 2012, we purchased the remaining interest in NAIF II. As a result, we began consolidating this entity and eliminated this note receivable. See Note 3 for more detail on this transaction.

8.7.Other Assets and Other Liabilities

Our other assets consisted of the following, net of amortization and depreciation, if applicable, as ofat December 31 (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2014   2013 

Leasing commissions

  $241,557    $222,267  

Rent leveling and above market leases

   349,634    337,812    224,589     256,018  

Leasing commissions

   218,506    220,602 

Value added taxes receivable

   110,906    93,721 

Derivative assets

   106,664     20,241  

Prepaid assets

   104,012    89,620    105,093     136,729  

Fixed assets

   90,177    53,525    86,927     85,389  

Value added taxes receivable

   86,331     106,074  

Loan fees

   53,025     49,920  

Management contracts

   66,466    89,427    52,896     61,082  

Loan fees

   49,344    57,266 

Other notes receivable

   34,763    37,734    46,570     38,860  

Deferred income taxes

   31,733    35,565    7,887     19,020  

Other assets

   67,512    57,508 

Other

   84,525     99,863  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Totals

  $        1,123,053   $        1,072,780   $        1,096,064    $        1,095,463  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Our other liabilities consisted of the following, net of amortization, if applicable, as ofat December 31 (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2014   2013 

Tenant security deposits

  $169,326    $191,070  

Income tax liabilities

  $463,102   $599,967    85,200     184,888  

Tenant security deposits

   174,137    158,544 

Unearned rents

   115,020    115,093    74,873     64,156  

Lease intangible liabilities

   53,289    68,256 

Derivative liabilities

   52,740     77,018  

Below market leases

   30,651     30,031  

Deferred income

   50,025    52,045    16,326     39,565  

Value added taxes payable

   31,399    42,895    13,358     57,260  

Environmental

   30,075    40,206    10,878     16,926  

Other

   198,864    148,542    173,074     159,731  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Totals

  $        1,115,911   $        1,225,548   $        626,426    $        820,645  

The expected future amortization of leasing commissions into rental expense of $218.5$241.6 million is summarized in the table below. We also expect our above and below market leases and rent leveling net assets, which total $296.3$193.9 million at December 31, 2012,2014, to be amortized into rental income as follows (in thousands):

 

    Amortization
Expense
   Net Charge to Rental
Income
 

2013

  $71,246   $56,289 

2014

   52,987    67,937 

2015

   39,423    48,360 

2016

   23,109    29,254 

2017

   12,570    23,369 

Thereafter

   19,171    71,136 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $                   218,506   $      296,345 

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

    Amortization
Expense
   

Net Charge to

Rental Income

 

2015

  $69,815    $10,678  

2016

   55,330     22,322  

2017

   41,783     25,152  

2018

   25,342     23,843  

2019

   15,531     20,413  

Thereafter

   33,756     91,530  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totals

  $241,557    $193,938  

 

9.8.Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We had five land parcels and oneseven operating propertyproperties that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012.2014, and three land parcels that met the criteria at December 31, 2013. The amounts included in held for sale as ofat December 31, 20122014 and 2013, respectively, represented the real estate investment balances and the related assets and liabilities for each property.

As discussed in Note 1, the FASB issued a standard updating the accounting and disclosure regarding discontinued operations in April 2014 which we adopted as of January 1, 2014. None of our property dispositions in 2014 met the new criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. The operations of the properties held for sale orthat were disposed of to third parties during 2013 and 2012 that met the criteria for discontinued operations, including the aggregate net gains or losses recognized upon their disposition (See Note 4 for more detail on gains on dispositions), are presented asDiscontinued Operations discontinued operations in ourthe Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. Interest expense is included in discontinued operations only if it is directlyOperations. Income attributable to these properties.

Discontinued operations are summarizeddisposed properties and assets held for sale was as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Rental income and recoveries

  $82,719   $141,547   $225,064 

Rental expenses

   (26,665)     (38,657)     (64,577)  

Depreciation and amortization

   (27,478)     (51,035)     (64,027)  

Interest expense

   (944)     (1,217)       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale

   27,632    50,638    96,460 

Net gains on dispositions

   65,927    64,489    326,004 

Impairment charges

   (30,596)     (2,659)     (87,702)  

Income tax on dispositions

   (233)     (3,216)     (3,728)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

  $              62,730   $            109,252   $            331,034 
    2013   2012 

Rental income and recoveries

  $34,105    $128,162  

Rental expenses

       (10,633)         (40,925)  

Depreciation and amortization

   (15,339)     (43,197)  

Interest expense

   (1,163)     (3,213)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income attributable to disposed properties

  $6,970    $40,827  

 

10.9.Debt

All debt is heldincurred directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership. The REIT itselfParent does not have any indebtedness, but guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. We generally do not guarantee the debt issued by non-wholly ownednon-wholly-owned subsidiaries.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Our debt consisted of the following as ofat December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2014   2013 
  Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
   Amount
Outstanding (2)
   Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
   Amount
Outstanding
   Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
   Amount
Outstanding (2)
   Weighted
Average Interest
Rate (1)
   Amount
Outstanding
 

Credit Facilities

   1.5 %    $888,966    2.2 %    $936,796 

Credit facilities

   - %    $    1.2%    $725,483  

Senior notes (4)(3)

   5.6 %     5,223,136    6.3 %     4,772,607    3.6%     6,076,920     4.5%     5,357,933  

Exchangeable senior notes (5)

   4.6 %     876,884    4.8 %     1,315,448    3.3%     456,766     3.3%     438,481  

Secured mortgage debt (6)(4)

   4.0 %     3,625,908    4.7 %     1,725,773    6.1%     1,050,591     5.6%     1,696,597  

Secured mortgage debt of consolidated entities (7)(5)

   4.4 %     450,923    4.5 %     1,468,637    2.5%     1,207,106     4.7%     239,992  

Other debt of consolidated entities (3)

   4.8 %     67,749    5.3 %     775,763 

Term loans

   1.3%     572,730     1.7%     535,908  

Other debt (8)(6)

   1.8 %     657,228    2.4 %     387,384    6.2%     16,086     6.2%     16,822  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Totals

                   4.4  %    $        11,790,794                    5.1  %    $        11,382,408    3.6%    $9,380,199     4.2%    $9,011,216  

 

(1)The interest rates presented represent the effective interest rates (including amortization of the non-cash premiums or discount).

 

(2)Included in the outstanding balances are borrowings denominated in non-U.S. dollars:currency, principally: euro ($1.83.3 billion), and Japanese yen ($2.1 billion) and British pound sterling ($0.20.4 billion).

 

(3)As discussed in Note 13 in connection with the liquidation of PEPR in 2012, we acquired the remainingNotes are due July 2017 to June 2026 and effective interest in PEPR’s assets and liabilities. As such, $1.4 billion was reclassifiedrates range from debt of consolidated entities1.4% to $538.7 million of senior notes and $852.2 million of secured mortgage debt. Also, as part of the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions, we assumed $1.0 billion of secured mortgage debt.7.6% at December 31, 2014.

 

(4)Notes areDebt is due January 2013July 2015 to July 2020April 2025 and effective interest rates range from 2.3% to 9.3%.

(5)Interest rates range from 3.3% to 5.9% and include the impact of amortization of the non-cash discount related to these notes. The weighted average coupon interest rate was 2.8% and 2.6% as of7.6% at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See below for more detail on these notes.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(6)Debt is due January 2013 to May 2025 and interest rates range from 0.8% to 7.6%.2014. The debt is secured by 402196 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $7.6$2.6 billion at December 31, 2012.2014.

 

(7)(5)Debt is due January 2013July 2015 to December 2027 and effective interest rates range from 1.9% to 8.3%.6.9% at December 31, 2014. The debt is secured by 107171 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $1.0$2.0 billion at December 31, 2012.2014.

 

(8)(6)The debt includes $17.6 million ofbalance at December 31, 2014, represents primarily assessment bonds and $639.6 million of corporate term loans with varying interest rates from 1.6%4.5% to 7.9% that are due May 2013December 2015 to September 2033. The assessment bonds are issued by municipalities and guaranteed by us as a means of financing infrastructure and secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $864.3$784.2 million at December 31, 2012.2014.

During 2011 and 2010, we repurchased certain senior and exchangeable senior notes outstanding, and also repaid certain secured mortgage debt in Japan. The original principal amount of the debt activity during 2011 and 2010 was $894.5 million and $3.0 billion, respectively, creating a gain of less than $1.0 million and a loss of $201.5 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Credit Facilities

We have a global senior credit facility (“Global(the “Global Facility”), fromunder which fundswe may be drawndraw in U.S. dollar,dollars, euro, Japanese yen, British poundpounds sterling and Canadian dollardollars on a revolving basis. The loans cannot exceed $1.7In June 2014, the Global Facility was amended to increase the availability to $2.5 billion (subject to currency fluctuations). We may increase the Global Facility to $2.7fluctuations, approximately $2.4 billion subject to currency fluctuations and obtaining additional lender commitments.at December 31, 2014). The Global Facility is scheduled to mature on June 3, 2015, butJuly 11, 2017; however, we may at our option andextend the maturity date twice, by six months each, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of an extension fee, extend the maturity date to June 3, 2016.fees. Pricing under the Global Facility, including the spread over LIBOR, facility fees and letter of credit fees, varies based upon the public debt ratings of the Operating Partnership. The Global Facility contains customary representations, covenants and defaults (including a cross-acceleration to other recourse indebtedness of more than $50 million).

We also have a ¥36.5¥45 billion (approximately $424.0($376.2 million at December 31, 2012)2014) Japanese yen revolver (the “Revolver”). The Revolver matures on March 1, 2014, but we may, at our option and subject with the ability to the satisfaction of customary conditions and payment of an extension fee, extend the maturity dateincrease to February 27, 2015. We may increase availability under the Revolver to an amount not exceeding ¥56.5 billion (approximately $656.0($472.3 million at December 31, 2012)2014) subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. Pricing under the Revolver iswas consistent with the Global Facility pricing.at December 31, 2014. The Revolver contains certain customary representations, covenants and defaults that are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Global Facility.

We refer to the Global Facility and the Revolver, collectively, as our “Credit Facilities”.Facilities.”

CommitmentsIn the first quarter of 2013, we entered into a $500 million bridge loan under which we could borrow in U.S. dollar, euro, or yen. We borrowed ¥20 billion ($215.7 million) under the bridge loan to make our initial investment in our co-investment venture in Japan. In connection with the contribution of properties to this venture, we paid the borrowings outstanding on this bridge loan and availability underterminated the facility.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Information about our Credit Facilities wereat December 31 was as follows (dollars in(in millions):

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

For the years ended December 31:

            

Weighted average daily interest rate

   1.6 %     2.7 %     2.5 %     1.1 %     1.7 %     1.6 %  

Weighted average daily borrowings

  $815.2   $870.9   $501.1   $182    $789    $815  

Maximum borrowings outstanding at any month-end

  $1,633.9   $2,368.1   $1,010.2   $742    $1,325    $1,634  

As of December 31:

      

Aggregate borrowing capacity

  $2,118.3   $2,184.6   $1,601.5 

At December 31:

      

Aggregate lender - commitments

  $2,742    $2,451    $2,118  

Less:

      

Borrowings outstanding

  $888.9   $934.9   $520.1        726     889  

Outstanding letters of credit

  $68.0   $85.0   $88.2    35     73     68  

Aggregate remaining capacity available

  $        1,161.4   $        1,164.7   $          993.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Current availability

  $        2,707    $        1,652    $        1,161  

Senior Notes

The senior unsecured notes are issued by the Operating Partnership and guaranteed by the REIT.Parent. Our obligations under the senior notes are effectively subordinated in certain respects to any of our debt that is secured by a lien on real property, to the extent of the value of such real property. The senior notes require interest payments be made quarterly, semi-annually or annually. All of the senior and other notes are redeemable at any time at our option, subject to certain prepayment penalties. Such redemption and other terms are governed by the provisions of indenture agreements, various note purchase agreements and/or trust deeds.

During the years ended December 31, we issued the following senior notes (dollars and a trust deed.euros in thousands):

2014  

Principal

Amount

   Interest
Rate
   Effective
Interest Rate
   Maturity
Date
 

February 2014 (1)

  700,000    $959,420     3.375%     3.52%     February 2024  

June 2014 (1)

  500,000    $680,550     3.000%     3.10%     June 2026  

October 2014 (1)

      600,000    $    756,420     1.375%     1.40%     October 2020  

2013  

Principal

Amount

   Interest
Rate
   Effective
Interest Rate
   Maturity
Date
 

August 2013

    $    400,000     2.750%     2.76%     February 2019  

August 2013

    $850,000     4.250%     4.28%     August 2023  

November 2013

    $500,000     3.350%     3.35%     February 2021  

December 2013 (1)

      700,000    $950,500     3.000%     3.08%     January 2022  

(1)This debt is denominated in euro and the exchange rate used to calculate into U.S. dollar was the effective rate at the date of the transaction.

Exchangeable Senior Notes

On March 16, 2010,At December 31, 2014, we issuedhad $460.0 million of 3.3%3.25% exchangeable senior notes maturing inthat mature on March 15, 2015 (“2010 Exchangeable Notes”). The 2010 Exchangeable Notes are exchangeable at any time by holders at an initial conversion rate of 25.8244 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $38.72 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The holders of the notes have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash at any time on or prior to the maturity date upon a

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

change in control or a termination of trading (each as defined in the notes). Due to the terms of the 2010 Exchangeable Notes, including that a conversion must be settled in common stock, the accounting for these notes is different than the exchangeable senior notes we issued in 2007 and 2008. The 2010 Exchangeable Notes are reflected at the issuance amount and interest is recognized basedtrading. Based on the stated coupon rate and the amortization of the cash discount.

We also issued three series of exchangeable senior notes in 2007 and 2008 and refer to them collectively as the “2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes”. The 2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes are senior obligations of Prologis and are exchangeable, under certain circumstances, for cash, our common stock or a combination of cash and our common stock, at our option, at a conversion rate per $1,000 of principal amount of the notes of 5.8752 shares for the March 2007 issuance, 5.4874 shares for the November 2007 issuance and 5.8569 shares for the May 2008 issuance. The initial conversion price ($170.21 for the March 2007 issuance, $182.24 for the November 2007 issuance and $170.74 for the May 2008 issuance) represented a premium of approximately 20% over the closing price of our common stock at the date of first sale and is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The 2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes are redeemable at our option beginning in 2012 and 2013, respectively, for the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and at any time prior to maturity to the extent necessary to preserve our status as a real estate investment trust. Holders of the 2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash on specific dates approximately every five years beginning in 2012 and 2013, respectively, and at any time prior to their maturity upon certain limited circumstances. Therefore, we have reflected these amounts in 2013 in the schedule of debt maturities below based on the first put date and we amortized the discount through these dates.

In April 2012, we redeemed $448.9 million of the exchangeable notes that were issued in March 2007, which was when the holders had the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash. In January 2013, we redeemed $141.4 million of the exchangeable notes issued in November 2007.

Interest expense related to our 2007 and 2008 exchangeable notes for the years ended December 31 included the following components (in thousands):

    2012   2011   2010 

Coupon rate

  $14,312   $24,810   $37,562 

Amortization of discount

   18,425    32,393    48,128 

Amortization of deferred loan costs

   1,280    2,071    2,691 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense

  $                34,017   $                59,274   $                88,381 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effective interest rate

   4.6 %     4.8 %     4.9 %  

The unamortized discount at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $4.2 million and $22.6 million, respectively. The carrying amount of the equity component is determined by deducting the fair value of the debt component from the initial proceeds of the exchangeable debt instrument as a whole. Additional paid-in capital under the conversion option was $381.5 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

While we have the legal right to settle the conversion in either cash or stock, we intend to settle the principal balance of the 2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes in cash. As stated above, the 2010 Exchangeable Notes are required to be settled in common stock. Based on current conversion rates, 2.8 million and2014, 11.9 million shares would be required to settle the principal amount in stock for the 2007 and 2008 Exchangeable Notes and the 2010 Exchangeable Notes, respectively.Notes. The conversion of the exchangeable notesExchangeable Notes into stock, and the corresponding adjustment to interest expense, are included in our computation of diluted earnings per share/unit, unless the impact is anti-dilutive. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011, and 2010, the impact of these notes was anti-dilutive.

The exchangeable senior notes are issued by the Operating Partnership and are exchangeable into common stock of the REIT. The accounting for the exchangeable senior notes requires us to separate the fair value ofWe recognized unrealized losses on the derivative instrument (exchange feature) fromassociated with exchangeable debt of $10.3 million, $1.2 million and $22.3 million for the debt instrument and account for it separately as a derivative contract. We have determined that the exchangeable notes issued in 2010 are the only exchangeable notes where the fair value of the derivative is not zero atyears ended December 31, 2012. At each reporting period, we adjust the derivative instrument to fair value with the resulting adjustment being recorded in earnings asForeign Currency2014, 2013 and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net.2012, respectively. The fair value of the derivative associated with our exchangeable notesthe Exchangeable Notes was a liability of $39.8$51.3 million and $17.5$41.0 million at December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2011,2013, respectively. We recognized an unrealized loss of $22.3 million and an unrealized gain of $45.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Secured Mortgage Debt

TMK bonds are a financing vehicle in Japan for special purpose companies known as TMKs. In 2012, we issued ¥36.6 billion ($424.5 million as of December 31, 2012) of new TMK bonds with maturity dates ranging from December 2013 to May 2019 with interest rates ranging from 0.8% to 1.4% and secured by nine properties with an undepreciated cost at December 31, 2012 of $767.3 million.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

Secured Mortgage Debt and Secured Mortgage Debt of Consolidated Entities

In addition, in 2012, we amended our existing TMK bonds increasing amountsare a financing vehicle in Japan for special purposes companies known as TMKs. In 2013, we issued ¥10.6 billion ($106.4 million) of new TMK bonds and paid off or transferred substantially all of our outstanding by ¥12.4 billion ($144.5 million as ofTMK bonds. At December 31, 2012)2013, we had one TMK bond outstanding for ¥1.5 billion ($14.3 million). As a result, the rangeIn 2014, we issued ¥7.2 billion ($70.7 million) of maturities on thesenew TMK bonds changed from 2012 to 2014 to a rangeand paid off or transferred all of December 2014 to April 2018, and the interest rates were reduced from a range of 1.8% to 4.0% to a range of 1.0% to 1.8%.our outstanding TMK bonds.

In connection with the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitionsacquisitions of a controlling interest in 2012, along with one other land acquisition,certain of our co-investment ventures in 2014 and 2013, we assumed secured mortgage debt of $1.0$1.2 billion that is secured by land and 107 properties with$190.4 million, respectively. See Note 3 for more information on these transactions.

Term Loans

In June 2014, we terminated our existing senior term loan agreement and entered into a total undepreciated cost of $1.3new agreement (the “Euro Term Loan”) under which loans can be obtained in U.S. dollars, euro, Japanese yen, and British pounds sterling in an aggregate amount not to exceed €500 million ($607.1 million at December 31, 2014). We may pay down and re-borrow under the Euro Term Loan and increase the borrowings up to €1.0 billion ($1.2 billion at December 31, 2012.2014), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. The interest rate on the Euro Term Loan is LIBOR plus 98 basis points and the loan is scheduled to mature in June 2017; however, we may extend the maturity date twice, by one year each, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of an extension fee. The Euro Term Loan has borrowings of €190 million ($230.7 million) at December 31, 2014.

Other Debt

On February 2, 2012,In May 2014, we entered into a seniorJapanese yen term loan agreement where(“Yen Term Loan”), under which we may obtain loans in an aggregate amount not to exceed €487.5 million¥40.9 billion ($648.5342.1 million at December 31, 2012)2014). The loans can be obtained in U.S. dollar, euro, Japanese yen, and British pound sterling. We may increase the borrowings to approximately €987.5¥51.1 billion ($427.2 million ($1.3 billion at December 31, 2012)2014), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. The loan agreementYen Term Loan is scheduled to mature on February 2, 2014, but we may extend the maturity date three times at our option, in each case up to one year, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of an extension fee. We fully drew the senior term loan and used the proceeds to pay off two term loans assumed in connection with the Merger2021, and the remainder to pay down borrowings on our Credit Facilities.interest rate is yen LIBOR plus 120 basis points. The Yen Term Loan was fully drawn at December 31, 2014.

Debt Covenants

We have approximately $6.1$6.5 billion of senior notes and exchangeable senior notes outstanding as ofat December 31, 2012. The senior notes2014 that were issued under twothree separate indentures, as supplemented, and are subject to certain financial covenants. The exchangeable senior notes, as well as approximately $180.7 million of notes that were not exchanged for Prologis senior notes at the time of the Merger, are not subject to financial covenants.

We are also subject to financial covenants under our Credit Facilities and certain secured mortgage debt.

As of At December 31, 2012,2014, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

Long-Term Debt Maturities

Principal payments due on our consolidated debt, duringfor each ofyear through the years in the ten-year period ending December 31, 20222024, and thereafter arewere as follows at December 31, 2014 (in millions):

 

  Prologis 

Consolidated

Entities’
Debt (1)

  

Total

Consolidated
Debt

  Prologis     
  Unsecured 

Secured

Mortgage
Debt

     Unsecured             
Maturity  Senior
Debt
 Exchangeable
Notes
 Credit
Facilities
 Other
Debt
 Total   

Senior
Notes

 Exchangeable
Notes
 Credit
Facilities
 

Term Loans
and

Other Debt

 

Secured
Mortgage

Debt

 Total 

Consolidated
Entities’

Debt

 

Total
Consolidated

Debt

 

2013(2)(3)

  $376  $484  $   $   $410  $1,270  $207 $1,477  

2014

   916       420   640    981   2,957   65  3,022  

2015(3)

   287   460   469   1    205   1,422   25   1,447  

2015(1)

 $  $460   $  $1   $24   $485   $114   $599  

2016

   640           1    318   959   127   1,086             1    294    295    446    741  

2017

   700          1    544   1,245   4   1,249    377          232    156    765    206    971  

2018

   900           1    309   1,210   74   1,284    262          1    111    374    166    540  

2019

   647           1    501   1,149   2   1,151    693          1    285    979    1    980  

2020

   677           1    9   687   2   689    1,096          1    6    1,103    189    1,292  

2021

               1    155   156   2   158    500          342    11    853    1    854  

2022

                   7   7   3   10    850          1    7    858    1    859  

2023

  850          1    7    858    1    859  

2024

  850          1    129    980    1    981  

Thereafter

               10    137   147   5   152    607          7       614    3    617  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subtotal

  $5,143  $    944  $889  $    657   $3,576  $11,209  $516  $11,725    6,085    460       589    1,030    8,164    1,129    9,293  

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

   80   (67)            50   63   3   66    (8)    (3)          20    9    78    87  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $    5,223  $877  $889  $657   $3,626  $11,272  $519  $11,791   $6,077   $457   $  $589   $1,050   $8,173   $1,207   $9,380  

 

(1)Our consolidated entities have $14.3 million availableThe Exchangeable Notes are due on March 15, 2015. We will settle the exchanges in all cash, all stock or a combination of both pursuant to borrow under credit facilities.the applicable indenture.

(2)

We expect to repay the amounts maturing in 2013 related to our wholly owned debt with cash generated from operations, proceeds from the disposition of wholly owned real estate properties and with borrowings on our Credit Facilities. The maturities in 2013 in our consolidated but not wholly owned subsidiaries principally include $79.2 million of secured mortgage debt, which we expect to extend,

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

or pay, through the issuance of new debt, with proceeds from asset sales, available cash, or equity contributions to our consolidated entities by us and our venture partners.

(3)The maturities in 2013 and 2015 include the aggregate principal amounts of the exchangeable senior notes, as this is when the holders first have the right to require us to repurchase their notes for cash.

Interest Expense

Interest expense from continuing operations included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Gross interest expense

  $580,787   $500,019   $435,289   $377,666    $471,923    $578,518  

Amortization of discount (premium), net

   (36,687)     228    47,136 

Amortization of premium, net

   (21,440)     (39,015)     (36,687)  

Amortization of deferred loan costs

   16,781    20,476    32,402    14,116     14,374     16,781  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   560,881    520,723    514,827 

Interest expense before capitalization

   370,342     447,282     558,612  

Capitalized amounts

   (53,397)     (52,651)     (53,661)     (61,457)     (67,955)     (53,397)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net interest expense

  $        507,484   $        468,072   $        461,166   $308,885    $379,327    $505,215  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

  $        258,441    $        426,528    $        546,627  

Early Extinguishment of Debt

In an effort to reduce our borrowing costs and extend our debt maturities, we repurchased certain debt, principally outstanding senior notes and secured mortgage debt, generally with proceeds from the issuance of senior notes outlined above and an equity offering in April 2013 (as described in Note 10). As a result, we may recognize a gain or loss represented by the difference between the recorded debt (net of premiums and discounts and including related debt costs) and the consideration we paid to retire the debt, including fees.

A summary of the activity related to the repurchase of debt and net loss on early extinguishment of debt is as follows (in millions):

    2014   2013 

Repurchase of senior notes

  $        1,290    $        2,142  

Repurchase of secured mortgage debt

  $528    $1,571  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  $165    $277  

The amountrepurchase of interest paid in cash, net of amounts capitalized, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010debt activity was $546.6 million, $467.4 million and $381.8 million, respectively.not considered significant during 2012.

 

11.10.Stockholders’ Equity of the REITPrologis, Inc.

Shares Authorized

At December 31, 2012,2014, 1.1 billion shares were authorized to be issued by the REIT,Parent, of which 1.0 billion shares represent common stock. The Board may, without stockholder approval, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our stock from time to time by setting or changing the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of such shares.

Common Stock

In 2011, in connection with the Merger, holders of ProLogis common shares received 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB common stock, ProLogis became a subsidiary of AMB and AMB changed its name to Prologis, Inc. Because ProLogis was the accounting acquirer (asAs discussed in Note 3), the historical ProLogis shares outstanding were adjusted by the Merger4, NBIM exercised a warrant and paid $213.8 million in exchange ratio and restated. As of the Merger date, 169.6for six million shares were added to reflect the outstanding shares of common stockstock.

In the fourth quarter of AMB. In addition, in late June 20112014, we issued 34.53.3 million shares of common stock generatingunder our at-the-market program, which generated $140.1 million in net proceeds. We had an equity distribution agreement that allowed us to sell up to $750 million aggregate gross sales proceeds of $1.1 billion. Asshares of December 31, 2012,common stock in this program, through two designated agents, who earn a fee of up to 2% of the gross proceeds, as agreed to on a transaction-by-transaction basis. On February 5, 2015, we had 461.8entered into a new equity distribution agreement that replaced and superseded the previous agreement. The new agreement allows us to sell up to $750 million aggregate gross sales proceeds of shares of common stock in this program, through six designated agents, who earn a fee of up to 2% of the gross proceeds, as agreed to on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

On April 30, 2013, we completed a public offering of 35.65 million shares of common stock outstanding.at a price of $41.60 per share, generating approximately $1.4 billion in net proceeds.

We have sold or issued sharesUnder the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), certain of our employees and outside directors are able to participate in equity-based compensation plans. Under this plan, we received gross proceeds for the issuance of common stock under various common stock plans, including stock-based compensation plans as follows:of $25.8 million, $22.4 million and $31.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectfully. See Note 13 for additional information on this plan.

The Incentive Plan and Outside Trustees Plan: Certain of our employees and outside directors participate in stock-based compensation plans that provide compensation, generally in the form of common stock. In 2012, the new 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved, which replaced all prior active incentive plans. See Note 14 for additional information on these plans.

1999 Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, as amended (the “1999 Dividend Reinvestment Plan”):Allowed holders of common stock to automatically reinvest distributions and certain holders and persons who are not holders of common stock to purchase a limited number of additional shares of common stock by making optional cash payments, without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge. In 2011, in connection with the Merger, this program was terminated.

Controlled Offering Program: We had an agreement with two designated agents to sell shares of common stock and earn a fee of up to 2% of the gross proceeds. There have been no shares of common stock issued since March 2010. In 2011, in connection with the Merger, this program was terminated.

ProLogis Trust Employee Share Purchase Plan (the “Employee Share Plan”):Certain of our employees were able to purchase common stock, through payroll deductions only, at a discounted price of 85% of the market price of the common stock. In 2011, in connection with the Merger, this program was terminated.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

Under the common stock plans discussed above, we received gross proceeds of $31.0 million, $0.7 million and $30.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, adjusted by the Merger exchange ratio of 0.4464 and issued shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, as follows (in thousands):

    2012   2011   2010 

Incentive Plan and Outside Trustees Plan

   2,258    793    617 

1999 Dividend Reinvestment Plan

             54 

Controlled Offering Program

             978 

Employee Share Plan

             76 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

           2,258                793            1,725 

Limited partnership units were redeemed for 0.1 million and 0.1 million common shares in 2012 and 2010, respectively. We did not redeem any limited partnership units in 2011. See Note 13 for more details.

Preferred Stock

At December 31, 2012,2014 and 2013, we had sevenone series of preferred stock outstanding. Holders of eachoutstanding, the series ofQ preferred stock, with a liquidation preference of $50 per share, a par value of $0.01 and a dividend rate of 8.54%, which will be redeemable at our option on or after November 13, 2026. Holders have, subject to certain conditions, limited voting rights and all holders are entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends based upon each series’ respective liquidation preference. The dividends for Series Q, R and S are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September, and December. The dividends for Series L, M, O and P are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of April, July, October and January.each quarter-end. Dividends on preferred stock are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. After

During the respectivesecond quarter of 2014, we repurchased approximately 435 thousand shares of Series Q preferred stock and recognized a loss on preferred stock redemption dates, eachof $6.5 million, which primarily represented the difference between the repurchase price and the carrying value of the preferred stock net of original issuance costs. In the second quarter of 2013, we redeemed all of the outstanding series L, M, O, P, R and S preferred stock and recognized a loss of $9.1 million in the first quarter of 2013, when we notified the holders of our intent to redeem these series of preferred stock can be redeemed at our option. The cash redemption price (other than the portion consisting of accrued and unpaid dividends) with respect to Series Q Preferred Stock is payable solely out of the cumulative sales proceeds of our other capital stock, which may include stock of other series of preferred stock. With respect to the payment of dividends, each series of preferred stock ranks on parity with the other series of preferred stock.

We had the following preferred stock issued and outstanding as of December 31 (in thousands):

    2012   2011 

Series L

  $49,100   $49,100 

Series M

   57,500    57,500 

Series O

   75,300    75,300 

Series P

   50,300    50,300 

Series Q

   100,000    100,000 

Series R

   125,000    125,000 

Series S

   125,000    125,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total preferred stock

  $        582,200   $        582,200 

Terms and conditions of our preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2012 was as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):

Series of Preferred Stock  Shares
Outstanding
  Liquidation
Preference
   Par
Value
   Dividend
Rate
   Optional
Redemption
Date

Series L

      2,000      $50,000       $0.01     6.50 %    (a)

Series M

      2,300       57,500       $0.01     6.75 %    (a)

Series O

      3,000       75,000       $0.01     7.00 %    (a)

Series P

      2,000       50,000       $0.01     6.85 %    (a)

Series Q

      2,000       100,000       $0.01     8.54 %    11/13/26

Series R

      5,000       125,000       $0.01     6.75 %    (a)

Series S

      5,000       125,000       $0.01     6.75 %    (a)
  

 

  

 

 

       
       21,300        $        582,500                  

(a)These shares are currently redeemable at our option.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Ownership Restrictions

For us to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code,REIT, five or fewer individuals may not own more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock at any time during the last half of our taxable year. Therefore, our charter restricts beneficial ownership (or ownership generally attributed to a person under the real estate investment trustREIT tax rules, (i) by a person, or persons acting as a group, of each of our issued and outstanding common series Land preferred stock series M preferred stock, series O preferred stock and series P preferred stock, or (ii) series Q preferred stock, series R preferred stock or series S preferred stock that together with all other capital stock owned or deemed owned by that person, would cause that person to own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our issued and outstanding capital stock. Further, subject to certain exceptions, no person shall at any time directly or indirectly acquire ownership of more than 25% of any of the series Q preferred stock, series R preferred stock and series S preferred stock. These provisions assist us in protecting and preserving our real estate investment trustREIT status and protect the interests of stockholders in takeover transactions by preventing the acquisition of a substantial block of outstanding shares of stock.

Shares of stock owned by a person or group of persons in excess of these limits are subject to redemption by us. The provision does not apply where a majority of the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, waives such limit after determining that theour status of us as a real estate investment trustREIT for federal income tax purposes will not be jeopardized or the disqualification of us as a real estate investment trustour REIT status is advantageous to our shareholders.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.stockholders.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)Dividends

Dividends

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, we paid all of our dividends in cash. The following summarizes the taxability of our common and preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

    2012 (1)   2011   2010 

Common Stock: (2)

      

Ordinary income

  $            0.38   $            0.07   $                  -   

Qualified dividend

   0.20    0.01      

Capital gains

   0.54    0.84    1.25 

Return of capital

        0.14      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total distribution

  $1.12   $1.06   $1.25 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series L (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.55    0.15   

Qualified dividend

   0.28        

Capital gains

   0.80    1.07   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.63    1.22    N/A  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series M (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.57    0.15   

Qualified dividend

   0.30        

Capital gains

   0.82    1.11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.69    1.26    N/A  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series O (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.59    0.16   

Qualified dividend

   0.31        

Capital gains

   0.85    1.15   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.75    1.31    N/A  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series P (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.58    0.15   

Qualified dividend

   0.30        

Capital gains

   0.83    1.13   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.71    1.28    N/A  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series Q (4):

      

Ordinary income

  $1.44   $0.38   $ -   

Qualified dividend

   0.75    0.04      

Capital gains

   2.08    3.85    4.27 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $4.27   $4.27   $4.27 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series R (4):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.57   $0.15   $ -   

Qualified dividend

   0.30    0.02      

Capital gains

   0.82    1.52    1.69 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.69   $1.69   $1.69 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series S (4):

      

Ordinary income

  $0.57   $0.15   $ -   

Qualified dividend

   0.30    0.02    -��  

Capital gains

   0.82    1.52    1.69 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $1.69   $1.69   $1.69 

(1)Taxability for 2012 is estimated.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(2)The historical shares were adjusted by the Merger exchange ratio of 0.4464. As a result, the common stock dividends were also adjusted pre-Merger.

(3)Represents the dividends paid since the Merger.

(4)Upon completion of the Merger, each outstanding Series C, F and G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share of beneficial interest in ProLogis was exchanged for a newly issued share of Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series Q, R and S, respectively.

In order to comply with the real estate investment trustREIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, we are generally required to make common and preferred stock distributionsdividends (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders in amounts that together at least equal to (i) the sum of (a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains and (b) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii) certain excess non-cash income. Our common stock dividenddistribution policy is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow to ensurethat ensures that we will meet the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code while allowingand that allows us to also retain cash to meet other needs, such as capital improvements and other investment activities.

Our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2014 has not been filed. The taxability information presented for our dividends paid in 2014 is based upon management’s estimate. Our tax returns for open tax years have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service, other than those discussed in Note 15. Consequently, the taxability of dividends is subject to change.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we paid all of our dividends in cash. The following summarizes the taxability of our common and preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

    2014 (1)(2)   2013   2012 

Common Stock:

      

Ordinary income

  $0.29    $   $0.38  

Qualified dividend

   0.41          0.20  

Capital gains

   0.62     1.12     0.54  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total distribution

  $1.32    $1.12    $1.12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series L (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $- -     $   $0.55  

Qualified dividend

   - -           0.28  

Capital gains

   - -      0.41     0.80  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $- -     $0.41    $1.63  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series M, R and S (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $- -     $   $0.57  

Qualified dividend

   - -           0.30  

Capital gains

   - -      0.42     0.82  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $- -     $0.42    $1.69  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series O (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $- -     $   $0.59  

Qualified dividend

   - -           0.31  

Capital gains

   - -      0.44     0.85  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $- -     $0.44    $1.75  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series P (3):

      

Ordinary income

  $- -     $   $0.58  

Qualified dividend

   - -           0.30  

Capital gains

   - -      0.43     0.83  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $- -     $0.43    $1.71  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred Stock - Series Q:

      

Ordinary income

  $0.71    $   $1.44  

Qualified dividend

   1.01          0.75  

Capital gains

   2.55     4.27     2.08  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividend

  $            4.27    $            4.27    $            4.27  

(1)Items indicated by ‘- - ‘ are not applicable.

(2)Taxability for 2014 is estimated.

(3)As discussed above, in April 2013, we redeemed all of the outstanding series L, M, O, P, R and S preferred stock.

Common stock dividends are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, qualified dividend, capital gains, non-taxable return of capital or a combination of the four. Common stock dividends that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital rather than a dividend and generally reduce the stockholder’s basis in the common stock. To the extent that a dividend exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholder’s basis in the common stock, it will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that stockholder’s common stock. At the beginning of each year, we notify our stockholders of the taxability of the common stock dividends paid during the preceding year.

The payment of common stock dividends is dependent upon our financial condition, operating results and real estate investment trust distribution requirements and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year. A cash dividend of $0.28 per common share for the first quarter of 2013 was declared on February 27, 2013. The dividend will be paid on March 29, 2013 to holders of common shares on March 12, 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.

Our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2012 has not been filed. The taxability information presented for our dividends paid in 2012 is based upon management’s estimate. Our tax returns for open tax years have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service, other than those discussed in Note 17. Consequently, the taxability of dividends is subject to change.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

12.11.Partners’ Capital of the Operating PartnershipPrologis, L.P.

For each share of common stock or preferred stock the REIT issues, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding common or preferred partnership unit, as applicable, to the REIT in exchange for the contribution of the proceeds from the stock issuance. In addition, other third parties own common limited partnership units that make up 0.41% of the common partnership units.

As of December 31, 2012, the Operating Partnership had outstanding 461.8 million common general partnership units, 1.9 million common limited partnership units and 21.3 million preferred general partnership units.

Distributions paid to the common limited partnership units and the taxability of the distributions are similar to the REIT’sParent’s common stock disclosed above.

 

13.12.Noncontrolling Interests

Operating PartnershipPrologis, L.P.

We report noncontrolling interests related to several entities we consolidate but of which we do not own 100% of the common equity. These entities include threetwo real estate partnerships that have issued limited partnership units to third parties. Depending on the specific partnership agreements, these limited partnership units are exchangeable into shares of ourthe Parent’s common stock (or cash), generally at a rate of one share of common stock to one unit. We evaluated the noncontrolling interests with redemption provisions that permit the issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the option of the issuer to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet is appropriate, including the requirement to settle in unregistered shares, and determined that these units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity. We also consolidate several entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity and the units of the entity are not exchangeable into our common stock.

IfAs discussed in Note 3, we contributebegan consolidating the co-investment venture NAIF in October 2014.

In the first quarter of 2014, we formed a propertynew U.S. co-investment venture, Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture, in which we hold a 55% equity ownership interest and have one partner. The venture is consolidated due to the structure and voting rights of the venture. At closing, the venture acquired from us a portfolio of 66 operating properties aggregating 12.8 million square feet for an aggregate purchase price of $1.0 billion.

In the second quarter of 2013, we acquired our partners’ interest in Prologis Institutional Alliance Fund II (“Fund II”), a consolidated co-investment venture,venture. In connection with this transaction, we paid $245.8 million and issued approximately 805,000 limited partnership units worth $31.3 million in one of our limited partnerships based primarily on appraised values of the propertyproperties. These units are exchangeable into cash or an equal number of shares of our common stock, at our option.

In the second quarter of 2013, we earned a promote from Fund II, of $18.8 million from the fund, which was based on the venture’s cumulative returns of the investors over the life of the venture. Of that amount, $13.5 million represented the third-party investors’ portion and is still reflected as a component ofNoncontrolling Interestin ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements but due to our ownership of less than 100%, there is an increase in noncontrolling interest related to the contributed properties, which represents the cash we receive from our partners.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.Operations.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

REITPrologis, Inc.

The noncontrolling interest of the REITParent includes the noncontrolling interests presented in the Operating Partnership, as well as the common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the REIT. AsParent.

During 2013, net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests was $10.1 million, of December 31,which $0.5 million was a loss from continuing operations and $10.6 million was income from discontinued operations. Amounts allocated to discontinued operations for 2012 the REIT owned 99.59% of the common partnership units of the Operating Partnership.were not considered significant.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following is a summary of the noncontrolling interest and the consolidated entity’s total investment in real estate and debt at December 31 (dollars and units in thousands):

 

  Our
Ownership
Percentage
  Noncontrolling Interest  Total Investment In
Real Estate
  Debt 
   2012  2011       2012            2011       2012  2011  2012  2011 

Partnerships with exchangeable units (1)

  various    various   $44,476  $11,173  $826,605  $827,263  $   $26,417 

Prologis Institutional Alliance Fund II (2)

  28.2 %    24.1 %        280,751   324,721   571,668   624,318   178,778   220,625 

Mexico Fondo Logistico (AFORES) (3)

  20.0 %    20.0 %    157,843       118,580   388,960   312,914   214,084   177,000 

Brazil Fund (4)

  50.0 %    50.0 %    66,494   53,186                 

Prologis AMS (5)

  38.6 %    38.6 %    59,631   83,897   160,649   211,627   63,749   77,041 

PEPR (6)

  100.0 %    93.7 %        106,759       4,047,329       1,699,587 

Other consolidated entities

  various    various    43,930   36,906   404,825   620,052   62,061   70,140 
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests

    653,125   735,222      2,352,707      6,643,503   518,672       2,270,810 

Limited partners in the Operating Partnership (7)

    51,194   58,613                 
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

REIT noncontrolling interests

         $704,319  $793,835  $2,352,707  $6,643,503  $518,672  $2,270,810 
  Our
Ownership
Percentage
  Noncontrolling Interest  Total Investment In Real
Estate
  Debt 
   2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 

Partnerships with exchangeable units (1)

  various    various   $70,716   $75,532   $711,310   $783,052   $  $ 

Prologis North American Industrial Fund

  66.1%    N/A    544,718        2,771,299        1,188,836      

Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture

  55.0%    N/A    427,307        1,006,183              

Brazil Fund (2)

  50.0%    50.0%    68,533    65,006                  

Mexico Fondo Logistico (AFORES) (3)

  20.0%    20.0%    17,122    220,292        457,006        191,866  

Other consolidated entities

  various    various    31,505    56,256    307,686    370,933    18,269    48,126  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Prologis, L.P. noncontrolling interests

    1,159,901    417,086    4,796,478    1,610,991    1,207,105    239,992  

Limited partners in Prologis, L.P. (4)

    48,189    48,209                  
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Prologis, Inc. noncontrolling interests

         $    1,208,090   $    465,295   $    4,796,478   $    1,610,991   $    1,207,105   $    239,992  

 

(1)At December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, there were 1,173,571 and 1,302,238 limited partnership units respectively, that were exchangeable into an equal number ofcash or, at our option, 1,887 and 1,949 shares, respectively, of the REIT’sParent’s common stock. In 2012, 16,9262014, 62 limited partnership units were redeemed for cash and 111,741 limited partnership units were redeemed for an equal number of common shares. In 2011, no$2.5 million. All of these outstanding limited partnership units were redeemed. The majority of the outstanding limited partnership units are entitled toreceive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly dividends paid on our common stock. In 2012, we recorded an additional purchase accounting adjustmentstock pursuant to the terms of $32.8 million associated with the Merger.applicable partnership agreements.

 

(2)In the second quarter of 2012, we purchased an additional interest in this venture from one of our partners for $14.1 million that increased our ownership to 28.2%.

(3)In the second quarter of 2012, we contributed four properties aggregating 0.8 million square feet to this entity for $40.6 million. As this entity is consolidated, we did not record a gain on this transaction. Also in 2012, this entity purchased two properties from third parties aggregating 0.4 million square feet. As a result of these transactions, the noncontrolling interests increased $39.8 million, which is primarily due to our partners’ investment in cash.

(4)We have a 50% ownership interest in and consolidate the Brazil Fund that in turn has investments in several joint ventures that are accounted for on the equity method.Fund. The Brazil Fund’s assets are primarily investments in unconsolidated entities of $152.2 million.$152.0 million at December 31, 2014. For additional information on our unconsolidated investmentinvestments, see Note 6.5.

 

(5)(3)In 2012, we recorded additional purchase accounting adjustments2014, AFORES contributed its remaining operating properties and the balance of $22.7its secured debt to FIBRA Prologis in two separate transactions. The difference between the amount received and the noncontrolling interest balance related to the properties contributed was $34.6 million, associatedand was adjusted through equity with the Merger.no gain or loss recognized. See Notes 4 and 5 for more information on these transactions.

 

(6)In June 2012, the unitholders of PEPR passed a resolution to wind-up the entity, pursuant to which we opted for in-kind distribution of assets with responsibility for all liabilities of PEPR. In September 2012, PEPR completed its delisting from two European stock exchanges, completed a distribution to the remaining common and preferred unitholders, and we acquired the remaining assets and liabilities.

(7)(4)At December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2011, 1,893,266 and 2,058,7302013, there were limited partnership units were associated with the common limited partners in the Operating Partnership andthat were exchangeable into an equal number ofcash or, at our option, 1,767 shares of the REIT’sParent’s common stock. During 2012, 165,464In 2014, no limited partnership units were redeemed for cash for $5.8 million. The majorityor the Parent’s common stock. All of thethese outstanding limited partnership units are entitled toreceive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly distributions paid on our common stock.stock pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

14.13.Long-Term Compensation

In May 2012, the stockholders of the REIT approved the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 LTIP”), which replaced all prior active long term incentive plans (“Prior Plans”). After approval of the 2012 LTIP, no furtherLTIP. All outstanding awards could be madegranted under the Prior Plans but outstanding awards previously granted under Prior Plans willprevious plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms. The number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2012 LTIP is equalprovides for grants of awards to 12.0 million plus the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the Prior Plans at the time the 2012 LTIP was approved, resulting in a total of 27.2 million shares that have been reserved for issuance under the 2012 LTIP. As of December 31, 2012, there were 25.9 million shares of common stock available for future issuance at December 31, 2012 of which 9.5 million are subject to outstanding awards.

Officers,officers, directors, employees, and other employees, consultants and independent contractors of the REITParent or its subsidiaries are eligible to become participants in the 2012 LTIP.subsidiaries. Awards made under the 2012 LTIP can be in the form of stock options (non-qualified options and incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights (“SAR”),and full value awards (restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance based shares)performance-based shares, restricted Operating Partnership units (“LTIP Units”) and cash incentive awards.awards). No participant can be granted more than 1.5 million sharesawards under the 2012 LTIP in any one calendar year. Awards canmay be made under the 2012 LTIP until it is terminated by the Board or until the ten-year anniversary of the effective date of the plan.

In 2011, in connection with the Merger, each outstanding award of ProLogis was converted into 0.4464 of a newly issued award of the REIT. Additionally, the exercise prices of stock options and the grant date fair values of full value We began granting awards have been adjusted to reflect the conversion of the underlying award. Values of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units of AMB were adjusted to their current fair value pursuant to the Merger. The fair value adjustment related to vested awards was recognized as an adjustment to paid-in capital and the portion of the adjustment related to unvested awards is being amortized to expense over their remaining service periods.

Performance Plans

In 2012, we granted performance-based cash incentive awards under two performance compensation plans approved by the compensation committee of the Board. Under the approved performance plans, referred to as the Outperformance Plan and the Private Capital Plan, certain officers and employees may earn incentive compensation in the form of cash incentive awards orLTIP Units during 2014. An LTIP Unit represents a partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. After vesting and the satisfaction of certain conditions, an LTIP Unit may be exchangeable for a common unit in the Operating Partnership and then redeemable for a share of common stock.

We have 27.2 million shares reserved for issuance, of which 23.1 million shares of common stock awards. The plans are designed suchwere available for future issuance at December 31, 2014. Each LTIP Unit counts as one share of common stock for purposes of calculating the limit on shares that awards willmay be paid only as a result of extraordinary performance by the Company.issued.

OutperformanceOut-Performance Plan (“OPP”)

For plan year 2012, cash incentiveWe grant awards were granted in February 2012 with athe form of points under our OPP corresponding to three-year performance period that began on January 1, 2012periods. The fair value of the awards are measured at the grant date and will end on December 31, 2014. Theseamortized over the performance period. OPP awards will only beare earned to the extent our total shareholderstockholder return

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(“TSR”) for the performance period exceeds the TSR for the MSCI US REIT Index for the same period plus 100 basis points. If this outperformance hurdle is met, the compensation pool will beis equal to 3% of the excess value created, subject to a maximum of the greater of $75 million or 0.5% of the our equity market capitalization at the start of the performance period. For 2012, eachEach participant wasis allocated a percentage of the total compensation pool. Awards earned, if any, for the performance period beginning in 2012 will be paid in cash. Awards earned at the end of the performance period cannot be paid to participants unless our absolute TSR, as defined in the plan, is positive for the performance period. If we outperform the TSR for the MSCI US REIT Index plus 100 basis points, but the absolute TSR is not positive, payment will be delayed until such time as our absolute TSR becomes positive. If after seven years our absolute TSR has not become positive, the awards will be forfeited.

AsWe used the initialMonte Carlo valuation model to value the points granted in 2014, 2013 and 2012. The points relate to a three-year performance period is payablethat begins on January 1 of the year granted. If the performance criteria are met, the participants’ points will be paid in the form of common stock or LTIP Units. In 2014, we gave certain participants the election to choose the form of payment of awards earned, if any, in common stock of the Parent or a special OPP type of LTIP Units (the “OPP LTIP Units”) that represents restricted operating partnership units in the Operating Partnership. For future performance periods, a participant may elect to receive common stock in the event that the performance criteria under the OPP are met or OPP LTIP Units upon the award of participation points. If the performance criteria are not met, the participation points and the OPP LTIP Units will be forfeited. At December 31, 2014, all awards are equity classified.

The 2012 grant was originally liability classified as the payment was expected to be in cash and the awards are liability-classified. The grant-date fair value of the award is measured at the beginning of the performance period and is amortized over the performance period. Onwas re-measured on a quarterly basis from the date of grant through the end of the performance period, the fair value of the award is re-measured and the expense iswas adjusted. We measureOn May 1, 2013, the compensation committee of the Board approved a modification of the settlement terms for the awards to be paid in shares of common stock. The award was reclassified from liability at fair value each reporting period using the Monte Carlo simulation model. We recognized $9.0 million of compensation expense related to plan year 2012equity based on the fair value at the date of the liability of $27.1 million as ofmodification date. At December 31, 2012.2014, the performance criteria were not met for the 2012 grant, and, therefore, no awards were earned and the points and OPP LTIP Units for the 2012-2014 performance period were forfeited.

Private CapitalThe following table details the assumptions of each grant based on the year it was granted (dollars in thousands):

    2014   2013   2012 (1) 

Risk free interest rate

   0.67%     0.39%     0.17%  

Expected volatility

   38%     38%     23%  

Aggregate fair value

  $        23,100    $        23,900    $        36,100  

(1)These assumptions are based on the date the grant was modified in 2013.

Prologis Promote Plan (“PCP”PPP”)

Under the PCP,PPP, we established a compensation pool equal to 40% of the aggregate incentive feespromotes earned by Prologis under agreements with our co-investment ventures. Eachventures, representing the third-party portion. The awards may be settled in cash or RSUs and, as of August 2014, participants may elect to receive LTIP Units in lieu of RSUs. The RSUs and LTIP Units have a three-year vesting period. At the beginning of each year, each participant wasis allocated a percentage of the total compensation pool for each applicable new co-investment venture.

A compensation pool was funded in February 2012. For plan year 2012, any awardsAugust 2014 and 2013 associated with promotes earned under the PCP would be payable in cash. We evaluate the likelihood that we will earn incentive fees from two of our co-investment ventures, onas discussed in Note 5. The total value of the awards in the third quarter of 2014 was $11.3 million, of which $4.2 million was paid in cash, approximately 57,000 RSUs were issued with a quarterly basis. grant date fair value of $2.4 million and approximately 113,000 LTIP Units were issued with a grant date fair value of $4.7 million. The total value of the awards issued in the third quarter of 2013 was $5.3 million, of which $2.7 million was paid in cash and approximately 69,000 RSUs were issued with a grant date fair value of $2.6 million.

We record an accrual when it becomes probablefor the estimated cash portion of the PPP at the same time the revenue is recognized.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

In addition to the RSU’s granted under the OPP and estimateable thatPPP, we willgrant RSUs to certain employees, generally on an annual basis. Each award represents one share of common stock of the Parent and generally vests over a continued service period. The RSUs earn these fees. Atcash dividends during the vesting period and are, therefore, considered participating securities. We charge the value of the dividend to retained earnings. The fair value of the RSU is generally based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and is charged to compensation expense during the vesting period, which is generally three years.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The activity for the year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to our RSUs was as follows (awards in thousands):

    Number of
Unvested RSUs
   Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair  Value
   Number of
Awards Vested
 

Balance at January 1, 2014

   2,266    $36.82     79  
      

 

 

 

Granted

   1,329     40.85    

Vested and distributed

   (1,019)     35.70    

Forfeited

   (55)     38.20    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Balance at December 31, 2014

   2,521    $39.38     106  

Total remaining compensation cost related to RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2014 was $52.4 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2018, with a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

Restricted Operating Partnership Units (“LTIP Units”)

LTIP Units are valued based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and generally vest ratably over three years. Distributions are paid with respect to the LTIP Units during the vesting period and, therefore, such LTIP Units are considered participating securities. OPP LTIP Units are paid distributions during the performance period equal to one tenth of a common stock dividend and may not be exchanged for a common unit in the Operating Partnership until earned and certain conditions are met. OPP LTIP units are therefore not considered a participating security. The value of the distribution is charged toNet Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest in the Operating Partnership in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The activity for the year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to the LTIP Units issued under the PPP (as explained above) was as follows (units in thousands):

    Number of
Unvested LTIP Units
   Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair  Value
 

Balance at January 1, 2014

       $  

Granted

   113     41.43  

Vested and distributed

          

Forfeited

          
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

   113    $41.43  

Total remaining compensation cost related to LTIP Units at December 31, 2014 was $4.2 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2017, with a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

During 2014, certain participants of the 2012 we determined that itLTIP were offered the election to exchange outstanding but unvested full value awards for LTIP Units, which exchange was completed in January 2015. In addition, in 2014, certain participants were offered an election to receive grants of LTIP Units in lieu of future grants of RSUs under the 2012 LTIP and PPP. The LTIP Units issued pursuant to such elections will have the same vesting period and grant date fair value as the RSUs issuable under such awards.

In December 2014, participants in the OPP were offered the election to exchange their previously granted participation points into OPP LTIP Units. In such election, participation points were exchanged into 2.8 million OPP LTIP Units with respect to the 2012-2014, 2013-2015 and 2014-2016 performance periods. The performance criteria for the 2012-2014 performance period was not probablemet. As a result, no OPP awards for the 2012-2014 performance period were earned and, in January 2015, all OPP LTIP Units that we would earn incentive fees from our co-investment ventures and therefore did not recognize any revenue or compensation costswere associated 2012-2014 performance period were forfeited with the PCPno impact in 2012.2014.

Stock Options

We have granted various5.3 million stock options to our employeesoutstanding and outside directors, subject to certain conditions. Each stock option is exercisable into one share of common stock. Stock options granted to employees generally have graded vesting over a three or four year period and have an exercise price equal to the market price on the date of the grant. Stock options granted to outside directors generally vest immediately or within one year of the grant. The maximum contractual term of the stock option is ten years. No stock options were granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010. The outstanding options are primarily AMB stock options that we fair valued as of the Merger date.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The activity for the year endedat December 31, 2012,2014 with respect to our stock options is presented below:

   Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable 
    Number of Options   

Weighted Average
Exercise

Price

   Number of
Options
   Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average Life
(in years)
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

   9,879,960   $                        34.93       

Exercised

                            (2,060,994)     24.12       

Forfeited/Expired

   (305,749)     56.46       
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

Balance at December 31, 2012

   7,513,217   $37.02    6,957,148   $37.76    4.7 

Total remaining compensation cost related to unvested options as of December 31, 2012, is $2.2 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining expense will be recognized through 2015, which equates to a weighted average periodexercise price of 0.6$34.80 and a weighted average life of 3.8 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised options was $5.8 million, $9.6 million, and $21.3 million.

As discussed in Note 3, we estimated the fair value of the AMB stock options using the Black-Scholes pricing model as of the Merger date. The fair value of the vested awards were included as part of the total Merger consideration. We used the following assumptions:

Expected volatility

25-55%

Weighted average volatility

44.6%

Expected dividends

3.73%

Expected term (in years)

1-6

Risk-free rate

0.19-1.92%

We use historical data to estimate dividend yield, expected term and employee departure behavior used in the Black-Scholes pricing model. The risk-free interestmillion for periods within the expected term of the share option is based on the United States treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the Merger. To calculate the expected volatility of Prologis we weighted the historical volatility of ProLogis and AMB, as well as peer group data.

Full Value Awards

We have granted full value awards, generally in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based awards (“PSAs”), to certain employees, generally on an annual basis. We also grant deferred stock units (“DSUs”) to our outside directors. Full value awards each represent one share of common stock and generally vest over a continued service period. Full value awards earn cash dividends or dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) (at our common stock dividend rate) over the vesting period that are charged to retained earnings.

The fair value of the full value awards is generally based on the market price of our common stock on the date the award is granted and is charged to compensation expense over the vesting or service period. For RSUs and PSAs the vesting period is generally three years. DSUs issued in 2011 and 2010 were fully vested at grant. DSUs granted in 2012 vest on the earlier of the date of the first annual stockholders meeting after the grant date or the first anniversary of the grant date.

The weighted average fair value of the full value awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $32.60, $34.13 and $23.75, respectively.

We granted PSAs in 2011 and 2010, but none No stock options were granted in 2012. Employees were granted a targeted number of PSAs, which were then earned, based on specified performance criteria over a one-year performance period. PSAs earned are then subject to an additional two-year vesting period. During the performancethree-year period the unearned PSAs accrue DEUs, which will be earned and vested according to the underlying award.

In 2011, we granted 280,525 PSAs and based on the attainment of specified individual and company performance goals, a total of 326,475 were earned. In 2010, we granted 242,406 PSAs and based on the attainment of specified individual and company performance goals, a total of 225,943 were earned.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Summary of Activity of our RSUs and PSAs

The activity for the year ended December 31, 2012 with respect to our RSU and PSA awards was as follows:

    

Number of

Shares

   

Weighted Average

Grant-Date Fair Value

   

Number of

Shares Vested

 

Balance at January 1, 2012

                       1,684,713   $                             30.43                        48,735 
      

 

 

 

Granted

   1,609,527    32.60   

Vested

   (1,238,036)     30.26   

Forfeited

   (56,856)     31.60   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Balance at December 31, 2012

   1,999,348   $32.28    47,680 

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock awards are full value awards that were granted under the AMB’s Prior Plans until the 2012 LTIP was approved. Restricted stock awards are valued based on the market price of common stock on the grant date. The vesting period for restricted stock is generally three to four years. We recognize the value of the restricted stock earned as compensation expense over the applicable service period, which is generally the vesting period. Restricted stock has voting rights during the vesting period.

The activity for the year ended December 31, 2012, with respect to our unvested restricted stock was as follows:

    

Number of

Shares

   

Weighted Average

Grant-Date Fair Value

 

Balance at January 1, 2012

                            1,192,982   $                             34.07 

Granted

   5,000    29.24 

Vested

   (507,840)     34.07 

Forfeited

   (2,865)     34.07 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   687,277   $34.03 

Compensation Expense2014.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recognized $49.6 million, $31.5 million and $25.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense including awards granted to our outside directors and net of forfeited awards. These amounts include expense reported asGeneral and Administrative Expenses andMerger, Acquisition and Other Integrated Expenses and are net of $8.8 million, $8.7 million and $5.3 million, respectively, that was capitalized due to our development and leasing activities.

Total remaining compensation cost related to unvested full value awards as of December 31, 2012 was $51.4 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining expense will be recognized through 2015, which equates to a weighted average period of 1.4 years. The fair value of the full value awards which vested in 2012 was $60.3 million.

Other Plans

In 2011, we had two 401(k) Savings Plan and Trusts (“401(k) Plans”), one from ProLogis and one from AMB. Effective January 1, 2012, the AMBThe Prologis 401(k) Plan merged into( the ProLogis 401(k) Plan, with the Prologis Plan (the “Plan”“401(k) Plan”) continuing on as the surviving plan. The new Plan provides for matching employer contributions of 50 cents for every dollar contributed by an employee, up to 6% of the employee’s annual compensation (within the statutory compensation limit). In the 401(k) Plan, vesting in the

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

matching employer contributions is based on the employee’s years of service, with 100% vesting at the completion of one year of service.

In 2011, the ProLogis 401(k) plan provided for matching employer Our contributions of 50 cents for every dollar contributed by an employee, up to 6% of the employee’s annual compensation (within the statutory compensation limit). Vesting inunder the matching employer contributions was based on the employee’s years of service, with 20% vesting each year of service, overprovisions were $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $1.8 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We have a five-year period. In the AMB 401(k)non-qualified savings plan matching employer contributions vested in full after one year of service by the employee.

In 2011, we had two nonqualified savings plans to provide benefits for certain employees, one from ProLogis and one from AMB. The purpose of these plans was to allowthat allows highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer the receipt and income taxation of a certain portion of their compensation in excess of the amount permitted under the 401(k) Plans. In the ProLogis deferred compensation plan, we matched the lesser of (a) 50% of the sum of deferrals under both the 401(k) Plan and this plan, and (b) 3% of total compensation up to certain levels. ThesePlan. There has been no employer matching contributions vested in the same manner as the ProLogis 401(k) Plan. In the AMB deferred compensation plan, employer matching was not offered. Effective as of January 1, 2012, a new deferred compensation plan for Prologis was established. Employer matching is not offered in the new plan.

On a combined basis for all plans, our contributions under the matching provisions were $1.8 million, $1.6 million and $1.3 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

three-year period ended December 31, 2014.

 

15.14.Merger, Acquisition and Other Integration Expenses

In connection2011, AMB Property Corporation (“AMB”) completed a merger (the “Merger”) with ProLogis. In the Merger, AMB was the legal acquirer and other related activities,ProLogis was the accounting acquirer. Following the Merger, AMB changed its name to Prologis.

In 2012, we incurred significant transaction, integration, and transitional$80.7 million of costs in 2011 and 2012. These costs included investment banker advisory fees; legal, tax, accounting and valuation fees; termination and severance costs (both cash and stock based compensation awards) for terminated and transitional employees; non-capitalized system conversion costs and other integration costs. Certain costs were obligations of AMB and expensed prior to the closing of the Merger by AMB. The following is a breakdown ofthese costs incurred for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

    2012   2011 

Termination, severance and transitional employee costs

  $54,283   $58,445 

Professional fees

   17,599    46,467 

Office closure, travel and other costs

   8,794    24,714 

Write-off of deferred loan costs

        10,869 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $        80,676   $        140,495 

The costs incurred during 2011 principally included transaction and transitional costs directly related to the Merger, including severance, and transactional costs associated with the PEPR Acquisition. At the time of the Merger, we terminated our existing credit facilities and wrote-off the remaining unamortized deferred loan costs associated with such facilities, which is included in these costs.The costs in 2012 were related principally to severance in connection with the Merger; non-capitalizable system implementation costs, as portions of the project move into the phase when the costs are expensed (i.e., training and data conversion);implementation; additional costs due to the liquidation of PEPRan unconsolidated co-investment venture we acquired in 2011 and severance and related costs due to organizational changes in Europe to centralize finance activities and gain efficiencies.

 

16.15.Impairment Charges

Impairment of Real Estate Properties

We recorded no impairment charges during 2014 or 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized impairment charges related to certain of our real estate properties for the years ended December 31 as outlined below (in thousands):totaling $283.5 million.

    2012   2011   2010 

Included in Continuing Operations:

      

Land

  $88,969   $    $734,668 

Operating properties

   163,945    21,237    1,349 

Other real estate

             595 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment of real estate properties - continuing operations

   252,914    21,237    736,612 

Discontinued Operations - operating properties and land subject to ground leases

   30,596    2,659    87,702 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impairment charges

  $        283,510   $        23,896   $        824,314 

Land

In the fourth quarter of 2012, we reviewed ourrecognized impairment charges of $77.5 million on land bankparcels located in Central and Eastern Europe. This impairment was based on our current intent to hold long-term (through the development of an industrial property) or to sell. Thisa review that resulted in a change in our intent from long-termdevelop and hold to sell for somecertain land parcels andparcels. We based the identification of other land parcels that had previously been impaired, through the 2010 review as discussed below, that are located primarily in Central and Eastern Europe for which the market has continued to lag in the global economic recovery. We have not experienced the same improvement in land values in these regional and other European markets that we have had in a majority of our global markets. The fair value of the land parcels was based on internal valuations, which were corroborated primarily from brokers’ opinion of value and comparable land sales, if available. If the carrying value of the land parcel exceeded fair value we adjusted the carrying value of the land. Accordingly, we recognized impairment charges of $77.5 million based on our evaluation of our investment in land as of December 31, 2012.

Additionally during 2012, weWe also recorded impairment charges of $11.4 million in 2012 on land parcels that we expected to sell as the carrying value exceeded the fair value at that time. TheWe based the fair value of the land was based on purchase and sale agreements.

DuringOperating Properties

In the fourth quarter of 2010, we made a strategic decision to more aggressively pursue land sales. As a result of this decision, we undertook a complete evaluation of all land positions. As a result of our change in intent, if the carrying value of the land exceeded fair value, based on valuations and other relevant market data, we adjusted the carrying value of the land targeted for disposition to fair value. Accordingly, we recognized impairment charges of $687.6 million based on our change in intent and evaluation of the fair value of our land as of December 31, 2010. We also recognized impairment charges of $47.1 million related to land sold as part of a larger transaction as discussed below.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Operating Properties

As discussed in Note 6,2012, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement for the formation of a new fund in Europe, PELP. Based on this agreement, we assessed the recoverability of the portfolio of assets we expectexpected to contribute to PELP by comparing the total expected proceeds to the carrying value of the portfolio of assets as ofat December 31, 2012. As a result, of this analysis, we recorded impairment charges of $135.3 million in continuing operations.

Additionally, at December 31,During 2012, we also recorded impairment charges for properties we expected to sell to third parties or contribute to co-investment ventures of $30.6 million in discontinued operations and $28.7 million in continuing operations, related to operating properties that we expect to sell or contribute to co-investment ventures. Therespectively. We calculated the impairment charges were calculated based on the carrying values of thesethose assets as compared withto the fair value.

Impairment charges of $30.6 million recorded in discontinued operations relate to operating properties that we expect to sell to third parties at less than our carrying value, at that time. We estimated fair valuewhich was primarily based upon letters of intent, purchase and sale agreements and third partythird-party appraisals. These properties were either sold during 2012 or are held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

Other Assets

In 2011,2012, we recorded impairment charges of $21.2 million in continuing operations related to real estate properties we expected to sell. Impairment charges of $2.7 million recorded in discontinued operations related to the South Korean properties sold to a third party in 2011.

In 2010, we made a decision to sell our retail and mixed-use properties and certain other non-core real estate investments. As a result, we classified all of these assets and related liabilities asAssets and Liabilities Held for Sale in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010. Based on the carrying values of these assets and liabilities, as compared with the estimated sales proceeds less costs to sell, we recognized an impairment charge of $168.8$16.1 million ($47.1 million related toon land and includedthat was received in Impairmentexchange for a note receivable from an entity in Europe that went into administration in 2011.

16.Income Taxes

Components of Real Estate Properties, $44.3 million related to the joint ventures and other assets and recorded inImpairment of Goodwill and Other Assets (described below); and $77.4 million was associated with operating properties and included in Discontinued Operations –Net Gains on Dispositions, Net of RelatedImpairment Charges andEarnings (Loss) before Income Taxes). We also recorded impairment charges of $10.3 million related primarily to our industrial properties in South Korea that we sold in 2011.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Assets

We recognized impairment charges related to goodwill and other assetsComponents of earnings (loss) before income taxes for the years ended December 31 were as outlined belowfollows (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Goodwill

  $    $    $368,451 

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities

        103,824    41,437 

Notes receivable

   16,135    22,608    2,857 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impairment of goodwill and other assets

  $        16,135   $        126,432   $        412,745 

Goodwill

In 2010, we recorded an impairment charge related to goodwill allocated to the Americas and Europe Real Estate Operations reporting units of $235.5 million and $132.9 million, respectively. As part of our review, we compared the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. We estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in each reporting unit through various valuation techniques as outlined in our summary of significant accounting policies. For the Real Estate Operations reporting units in the Americas and Europe, the carrying values exceeded the fair values. We then calculated the implied goodwill for each reporting unit by allocating the estimated fair values to the underlying assets and liabilities and determined that goodwill was impaired for each reporting unit.

The fair value of these reporting units in 2010 decreased due principally to the strategic decision we made in the fourth quarter of 2010 to significantly downsize our development platform. As a result, we targeted for sale to third parties a substantial portion of our land that we had previously expected to develop, some of which was acquired in the acquisitions that originally created the goodwill. In addition, we planned to sell to third parties our non-core and certain other assets that we acquired in connection with these same acquisitions.

Other Assets

In the second quarter of 2011, we recorded impairment charges of $103.8 million primarily related to two of our investments in unconsolidated entities. This included one investment in the United States, Prologis NAIII, where our carrying value exceeded the fair value. This entity has not had the same appreciation in value in its portfolio that we have experienced in our consolidated portfolio and in several of our other entities. We determined the fair value of the underlying real estate assets using discounted cash flow models developed externally by a third party, which we corroborated through our discounted cash flow models. Based on the duration of time that the value of our investment has been less than carrying value and the lack of recovery as compared to our other real estate investments, we no longer believed the decline to be temporary. Also included was our investment in a co-investment venture in South Korea that we sold to our venture partner in July 2011. We had previously recognized an impairment associated with this investment due to the decline in value that we believed to be other than temporary.
    2014   2013   2012 

Domestic

  $390,874    $(404,910)    $(65,566)  

International

   322,754     741,172     (37,251)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  $        713,628    $        336,262    $        (102,817)  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

We had a receivable from an entity that developed retail and mixed use properties in Europe that was secured by land parcels. In late 2011, the entity went into administration. In exchange for the note receivable, we received three land parcels and debt. Based on the fair value of the land less the assumption of debt received in the exchange and information available to us in the fourth quarter of 2011, the remaining receivable balance of $20.5 million was impaired. In the first quarter of 2012, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $16.1 million as a result of additional information that became available in the first quarter of 2012 and provided additional evidence indicating that the value of the land is less than originally estimated in the fourth quarter of 2011.

In 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $41.4 million for investments in other joint ventures and $2.9 million for a note receivable in connection with the expected sale of these non-core real estate investments, as discussed above in real estate impairments.

17.Income Taxes

Components of Loss before Income Taxes

Components of loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, were as follows (in thousands):

    2012   2011   2010 

Domestic

  $        (58,183)    $        (300,445)    $        (1,098,438)  

International

   (31,439)     35,031    (533,548)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

  $(89,622)    $(265,414)    $(1,631,986)  

Summary of Current and Deferred Income Taxes

Components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011   2010 

Current income tax expense (benefit)

      

United States Federal

  $        (27,897)    $        (9,392)    $        15,257 

International

   46,294    30,010    248 

State and local

   7,383    4,177    9,947 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current

   25,780    24,795    25,452 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

      

United States Federal

   152    (1,333)     13,913 

International

   (22,119)     (18,470)     (66,136)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Deferred

   (21,967)     (19,803)     (52,223)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense (benefit), included in continuing and discontinued operations

  $3,813   $4,992   $(26,771)  
    2014   2013   2012 

Current income tax expense (benefit):

      

United States federal

  $(6,585)    $20,009    $(27,897)  

International

   52,155     99,478     46,294  

State and local

   16,014     8,501     7,383  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current tax expense

   61,584     127,988     25,780  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

      

United States federal

   (27,374)     (1,133)     152  

International

   (59,866)     (18,934)     (22,119)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax benefit

   (87,240)     (20,067)     (21,967)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense (benefit), included in continuing and discontinued operations

  $(25,656)    $107,921    $3,813  

Current Income Taxes

Current income tax expense is generally a functionconsists of the level offederal income recognized bytax from our TRSs,taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”), state and local income taxes and taxes incurred in foreign jurisdictions. Current income tax expense recognized during 2014 is principally due to tax triggered upon the contribution of the initial portfolio of properties by certain wholly-owned and AFORES entities to FIBRA Prologis, as the transaction was structured as an asset sale for Mexican tax purposes. The tax expense was netted against a current benefit recognized during 2014 from the operating losses generated by our United States TRS. Current tax expense in 2013 was due to the net tax expense recognized on the initial contribution of properties to PELP and NPR that were previously held in certain foreign jurisdictions and interest and penalties associated with our uncertain tax positions. United States TRSs.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, we recognized a net $28.5 million benefit $9.0 million benefit and $11.8 million expense, respectively, for uncertain tax positions.positions of $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $28.5 million, respectively. The benefit that was recognized in all years relates to the reversal of certain expenses due to the expiration of the statute of limitations and settlements with the taxing authorities and the expense recognized relates to interest and penalties associated with our uncertain tax positions.authorities.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, was $38.4$105.4 million, $41.2$99.5 million and $25.9$38.4 million, respectively.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (principally basis differences between tax and financial reporting for real estate assets and equity investments) and generation of tax net operating losses that may be realized in future periods depending on sufficient taxable income.

For federal income tax purposes, certain acquisitions have been treated as tax-free transactions resulting in a carry-over basis in assets and liabilities for tax purposes. For financial reporting purposes and in accordance with purchase accounting, we record all of the acquired assets

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

and liabilities at the estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. For our taxable subsidiaries, including international jurisdictions, we recognize the deferred income tax liabilities that represent the tax effect of the difference between the tax basis carried over and the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets at the date of acquisition. If taxable income is generated in these subsidiaries, we recognize a deferred income tax benefit in earnings as a result of the reversal of the deferred income tax liability previously recorded at the acquisition date and we record current income tax expense representing the entire current income tax liability. Any increases or decreases to the deferred income tax liability recorded in connection with these acquisitions, related to tax uncertainties acquired, are reflected in earnings.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as ofat December 31 were as follows (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2014   2013 

Gross deferred income tax assets:

        

Net operating loss carryforwards (1)

  $611,027    $443,026    $346,978    $391,764  

Basis difference - real estate properties

   172,336     185,266     105,205     133,767  

Basis difference - equity investments

   13,163    20,008    12,401     9,238  

Basis difference - intangibles

   17,408    24,664    5,952     8,113  

Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward

   1,387    1,388 

Foreign tax credit carryforward

   1,963    1,944 

Section 163(j) interest limitation

   53,542    36,733    32,703     33,224  

Capital loss carryforward

   30,395         25,282     32,054  

Other - temporary differences

   16,746     14,784    10,701     20,124  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total gross deferred income tax assets

   917,967     727,813     539,222     628,284  

Valuation allowance

   (859,305)     (641,064)     (518,241)     (583,675)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance

   58,662     86,749     20,981     44,609  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross deferred income tax liabilities:

        

Basis difference - real estate properties

   436,961     567,943     89,998     167,951  

Built-in-gains - real estate properties

   6,402    6,402 

Basis difference - equity investments

   958    1,118 

Built-in-gains - equity investments

   22,053    22,111 

Basis difference - intangibles

   10,591    9,742 

Built-in-gains - equity investments and real estate properties

        27,116  

Basis difference- intangibles

   7,324     8,823  

Other - temporary differences

   5,123    7,384    716     5,269  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total gross deferred income tax liabilities

   482,088     614,700     98,038     209,159  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred income tax liabilities

  $        423,426   $        527,951   $77,057    $164,550  

 

(1)At December 31, 2012,2014, we had net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards as follows (in millions):

 

  U.S.   Europe   Mexico   Japan   Other   U.S.   Europe   Mexico   Japan   Other 

Gross NOL carryforward

  $            96.8   $            1,447.7   $            494.3   $            186.8   $              57.0   $92    $747    $246    $132    $67  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Tax-effected NOL carryforward

   36.3    393.7    140.8    26.6    13.6    35     197     74     25     16  

Valuation allowance

   (36.3)     (374.5)     (136.7)     (26.6)     (13.6)     (35)     (188)     (74)     (25)     (16)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset-NOL carryforward

  $    $19.2   $4.1   $    $ -     $    $9    $    $    $  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Expiration periods

   2022-2032         2013-indefinite         2013-2022     2013-2021         2013-indefinite     2022-2033     2015-indefinite     2015-2025     2015-2023     2015-indefinite  

The increasedecrease in deferred income tax assets from 2011 to 2012liabilities during 2014 is primarily due to NOL carryforwards recorded for certain jurisdictions based on taxable losses incurred during 2012. Additionally, the increase isprincipally due to the capital loss carryforward createdreversal of deferred tax liabilities of $62.8 million in connection with the initial contribution of properties to FIBRA Prologis in June 2014, as discussed above, and $27.1 million due to the expiration of the holding period on properties previously acquired with existing built-in-gains. These decreases were partially offset by the NAIF II transaction for onereversal of our United States TRS entities.

The increase in deferred tax assets was more than offset by an increaseliabilities in 2013 related to the contribution of properties to PELP.

In addition, we utilized net operating losses (“NOLs”), for which we had previously recorded a valuation allowance recorded against, of $37.6 million which were generated in prior years to offset current income tax expense which was triggered as part of the deferred tax assets. FIBRA transaction.

We recordedrecord a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions becausewhen we could notcannot sustain a conclusion that it wasis more likely than not that we couldcan realize the deferred tax assets and NOL carryforwards.carryforwards during the periods in which these temporary differences become deductible. The deferred tax asset valuation allowance is adequate to reduce the total deferred tax asset to an amount that we estimate will “more-likely-than-not” be realized, as we are not currently forecasting sufficient taxable income for these benefits to be realized.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The decrease in deferred tax liabilities from 2011 to 2012 is primarily due the reversal of deferred tax liabilities on real estate properties in Europe that were either sold to third parties or contributed to our co-investment ventures.

Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, we believe that we and our consolidated REIT subsidiary have complied with the real estate investment trustREIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The statute of limitations for our tax returns is generally three years. As such, our tax returns that remain subject to examination would be primarily from 20092011 and thereafter. Our major tax jurisdictions outside the United States are Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Singapore, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The liability for uncertain tax positions principally consisted of estimated federal and state income tax liabilities and included accrued interest and penalties of $0.8$0.3 million and $26.4$0.9 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively. A reconciliation of the liability for uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):

 

    2012   2011 

Balance at January 1,

  $        36,464   $        70,496 

Additions for tax positions taken during the current year

       8,061 

Additions for tax positions taken during a prior year

   407    7,058 

Reductions for tax positions taken during a prior year

   (124)     (11,464)  

Settlements with taxing authorities

       (24,835)  

Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations

   (28,804)     (12,852)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31,

  $7,943   $36,464 
    2014   2013 

Balance at January 1

  $1,318    $7,943  

Additions for tax positions taken during a prior year

   256     405  

Settlements with taxing authorities

                (7,030)  

Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations

   (1,318)       
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $            256    $1,318  

 

18.17.Earnings / Loss Per Common Share / Unit

We determine basic earnings per share/unit based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock/units outstanding during the period. We compute diluted earnings per share/unit based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average effect from all outstanding potentially dilutive instruments.

The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share/unit for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share/unit amounts):

 

REIT  2012 (1)   2011 (1)   2010 (1) 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

  $        (80,946)    $        (188,110)    $    (1,295,920)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted (2)(3)(4)

   459,895    370,534    219,515 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic and Diluted

  $(0.18)    $(0.51)    $(5.90)  

Operating Partnership

               

Net loss attributable to common unitholders

  $(81,108)    $(188,459)    $(1,295,920)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common partnership units outstanding - Basic and Diluted (2)(3)(4)

   461,848    371,730    219,515 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic and Diluted

  $(0.18)    $(0.51)    $(5.90)  
Prologis, Inc.  2014   2013   2012 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

  $622,235    $315,422    $(80,946)  

Noncontrolling interest attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units

   3,636     1,305     (162)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

  $        625,871    $        316,727    $        (81,108)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic (1)

   499,583     486,076     459,895  

Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units (2)

   3,501     2,060     1,953  

Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrants

   3,307     3,410      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted (3)

   506,391     491,546     461,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders -

      

Basic

  $1.25    $0.65    $(0.18)  

Diluted

  $1.24    $0.64    $(0.18)  
Prologis, L.P.  2014   2013   2012 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders

  $624,436    $316,630    $(81,108)  

Noncontrolling interest attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units

   1,435     97      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders

  $625,871    $316,727    $(81,108)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common partnership units outstanding - Basic (1)

   501,349     487,936     461,848  

Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units

   1,735     200      

Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrants of Prologis, Inc.

   3,307     3,410      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common partnership units outstanding - Diluted (3)

   506,391     491,546     461,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders -

      

Basic

  $1.25    $0.65    $(0.18)  

Diluted

  $1.24    $0.64    $(0.18)  

 

(1)In periods with a net loss, the inclusion of any incremental shares/units is anti-dilutive, and therefore, both basic and diluted shares/units are the same.

(2)The increase in shares/units between the periods is primarily due to the Merger (see Note 3 for more details) and an equity offering in June 2011.April 2013.

 

(3)(2)TotalIncome (loss) allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent has been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods since the per share/unit amount is the same. The incremental weighted average potentially dilutive share awardsexchangeable Operating Partnership units (in thousands) were 1,767, 1,860 and warrants outstanding (in thousands)1,953 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010 were 9,805, 7,648 and 4,498,2012, respectively.

(4)The shares underlying the exchangeable debt have not been included because the impact would be anti-dilutive.

19.Related Party Transactions

In 2012 and 2010, Irving F. Lyons, III, member of the Board, Trustee of ProLogis prior to the Merger and former Chief Investment Officer, converted limited partnership units in the limited partnerships, in which we own a majority interest and consolidate, into 45,600 and 22,431 shares of our common stock, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Lyons owned 27,752 of the outstanding partnership units. See Note 13 for more information regarding these limited partnerships in the Americas.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

Also see Note 6 for a discussion of transactions between us and the unconsolidated entities in which we invest.

(3)Total weighted average potentially dilutive stock awards and warrant outstanding (in thousands) were 14,366, 13,998, and 9,805 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total weighted average potentially dilutive shares/units from exchangeable debt outstanding (in thousands) were 11,879 for all periods presented. Total weighted average potentially dilutive limited partnership units outstanding (in thousands) were 1,932, 1,558, and 1,284 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

20.18.Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage these risks, we may enter into various derivative contracts. Foreigncontracts, such as foreign currency contracts including forwards and options, may be used to manage foreign currency exposure. We may useexposure, and interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate fluctuations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The majorityAll of our derivative financial instruments are customized derivative transactions and are not exchange-traded. Management reviews our hedging program, derivative positions, and overall risk management strategy on a regular basis. We only enter into transactions that we believe will be highly effective at offsetting the underlying risk.

Our use of derivatives does involveinvolves the risk that counterparties may default on a derivative contract. We establish exposure limits for each counterparty to minimize this risk and provide counterparty diversification. Substantially all of our derivative exposures are with counterparties that have long-term credit ratings of single-A or better. We enter into master agreements with counterparties that generally allow for netting of certain exposures; thereby significantly reducing the actual loss that would be incurred should a counterparty fail to perform its contractual obligations. To mitigate pre-settlement risk, minimum credit standards become more stringent as the duration of the derivative financial instrument increases. To minimize the concentration of credit risk, we enter into derivative transactions with a portfolio of financial institutions. Based on these factors, we consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.

AllWe recognize all derivatives are recognized at fair value in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets within the line itemsOther Assets orAccounts Payable and Accrued ExpensesOther Liabilities, as applicable. We do not net our derivative position by counterparty for purposes of balance sheet presentation and disclosure. Derivatives can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The accounting for gains and losses that result from changes in the fair values of derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives are designated as, and qualify as, hedging instruments.

For derivatives that will be accounted for as hedging instruments, in accordance with the accounting standards, at inception of the transaction, we formally designate and document the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure, the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, we formally assess both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. The ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument’s change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings. DerivativesWe also use derivatives that are not designated as hedges are(and may not speculative and are usedmeet the hedge accounting requirements) to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements.fluctuations.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations are recorded inAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCIin ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due to the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instruments and the underlying exposures hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments will generally be offset by changes in the fair values or cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. The changes in fair values of derivatives that were not designated and/or did not qualify as hedging instruments are immediately recognized in earnings. For cash flow hedges, we reclassify changes in the fair value of derivatives into the applicable line item in ourthe Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period that the underlying hedged items affect earnings.

Foreign currency hedgesOur co-investment ventures may also enter into derivative contracts. As we act as the manager of these ventures, these ventures primarily follow the same hedging strategy and risk mitigation that we use. For our consolidated co-investment ventures, the accounting treatment is as described in this footnote. For our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, we record our proportionate share of any earnings impact inEarnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Netin the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, for derivatives in our unconsolidated ventures that have been designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we record our proportionate share of the effective gain or loss as a component ofAOCI in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In both circumstances, we record the offsetting amount asInvestments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Foreign Currency

We hedge the net assets of certain ofprimarily manage our international subsidiaries (net investment hedges) using foreign currency forward contractsexposure by borrowing in the currencies in which we invest. In certain circumstances, we may also borrow debt in a currency that is not the same functional currency of the borrowing entity to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our net investment in international subsidiaries. To mitigate the impact to our earnings from the fluctuations in exchange rates, we may designate the debt as a non-derivative financial instrument hedge. We also hedge our investments in certain international subsidiaries using foreign currency derivative contracts (net investment hedges) to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

investments in these subsidiaries.subsidiaries by locking in a forward exchange rate at the inception of the hedge. We measure the effectiveness of our net investment hedges and our non-derivative financial instrument hedges by using the changes in forward exchange rates because this method reflects our risk management strategies, the economics of those strategies in ourthe financial statements and better manages interest rate differentials between different countries. Under this method, we report all changes in fair value of the forward contract are reportednon-derivative financial instrument and net investment hedges in stockholders’ equity in the foreign currency translation component ofAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI and offsetsin the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts offset the translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates,investments, which arewe also recordedrecord inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss AOCI. Ineffectiveness,We recognize ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized in earnings.

In 2012, we entered into 11earnings at the time the ineffectiveness occurred. We did not record any ineffectiveness on our foreign currency forwardderivative contracts that expire in Aprilduring the three years ended December 31, 2014.

We may use foreign currency option contracts, including puts, calls and May 2013collars to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with an aggregate notional amount of €1.0 billion ($1.3 billion using the forward rate of 1.30) to hedge a portiontranslation of our investmentprojected net operating income of our international subsidiaries, principally in Europe and Japan. The put option contracts provide us with the option to exchange euros or yen for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the euro or yen were to depreciate against the U.S. dollar, such that, if the euro or yen were to depreciate against the U.S. dollar to predetermined levels as set by the contracts, we could exercise our options and mitigate our foreign currency exchange losses. Call option contracts would create an obligation to exchange euro or yen for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the euro or yen were to appreciate against the U.S. dollar, such that, if the euro or yen were to appreciate against the U.S. dollar to predetermined levels as set by the contracts we would be obligated to pay out under the contract and offset our foreign currency exchange gains. A collar contract combines the put and call options into one contract with the purchase of a foreign currency put option, combined with the sale of a foreign currency call option such that there is no cash outlay at execution. This strategy effectively locks in a range around the rate at which net operating earnings of our international subsidiaries will be translated into U.S. dollars. These derivatives were

Foreign currency option contracts are not designated and qualify as hedging instruments and, therefore, the changeshedges as they do not meet hedge accounting requirements. Changes in fair value of these derivatives were recorded in the foreign currency translation component ofAccumulated Other Comprehensive Lossin our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We had $17.5 million recorded inAccounts Payable and Accrued Expenses in our Consolidated Balance Sheets relating to the fair value of these derivative contracts at December 31, 2012. Amounts includedderivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings within the line itemAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossForeign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012, were lossesStatements of $17.5 million. None of these hedges were ineffective during the year ended December 31, 2012, therefore, there was no impact on earnings.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.Operations.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Interest rate hedgesRate

Our interest rate risk management strategy is to limit the impact of future interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows as well as to stabilize interest expense and manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To achieveWe primarily accomplish this objective, weby issuing fixed rate debt with staggering maturities. We may enter into interest rate swap agreements, which allow us to borrow on a fixed rate basis for longer-term debt issuances, or interest rate cap agreements, which allow us to minimize the impact of increases in interest rates. We typically designate our interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements as cash flow hedges as these derivative instruments may be used to manage the interest rate risk on potential future debt issuances or to fix the interest rate on variable rate debt issuances. The maximum length of time that we hedge our exposure to future cash flows is typically less than 10 years. We use cash flow hedges to minimize the variability in cash flows of assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions caused by fluctuations in interest rates.

We have entered into interest rate swap agreements whichthat allow us to receive variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of our agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. We had 32 interest rate swap contracts, which included 24 contracts denominated in euro, two contracts denominated in British pound sterling, five contracts denominated in Japanese yen and one contract denominated in U.S dollar, outstanding at December 31, 2012. During 2011, we acquired and settled an interest rate cap agreement that allowed us to receive variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rose above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium. We had $28.0 million and $28.5 million accrued inAccounts Payable and Accrued Expenses in our Consolidated Balance Sheets relating to these unsettled derivative contracts at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

TheWe report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component ofAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets, and reclassifiedreclassify it toInterest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the corresponding period of the hedged item. TheTo the extent the hedged debt is paid off early, we recognize the amounts reclassified to interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $14.7 million. The amounts reclassified to interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were not considered material. For the next twelve months from December 31, 2012, we estimate that an additional expenseinAOCIasGains (Losses) on Early Extinguishment of $1.5 million will be reclassified into interest expense. Amounts included inAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossDebt, Net in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were lossesStatements of $33.8 million and $51.7 million, respectively.Operations.

LossesWe recognize losses on a derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized inInterest Expense at the time the ineffectiveness occurred. We recorded lossesLosses due to hedge ineffectiveness of $2.4 million and $1.8 millionwere not considered material during the yearthree years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We did not have any losses due to hedge ineffectiveness during the year ended December 31, 2010. Also in2014. In 2012, we recorded a loss of $11.0 million inGain (Loss) on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net related to interest rate swaps that were considered ineffective with a notional amount of $703.8 million.million that were considered ineffective. These derivatives arewere associated with debt that was paid off or transferred in late January and early Februarythe first quarter of 2013, or are expected to be transferred, in connection with the contribution to our new European co-investment venture, PELP (see Note 64 for more details of this venture). When it was probable the related forecasted transaction would not occur, we deemed the hedge was deemed ineffective and wrote-off the balance inAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossAOCI was written off..

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes the activity in our derivative instruments for the years ended December 31 as follows (in millions):

 

   2012   2011   2010 
    Foreign
Currency
Forwards
   

Interest

Rate

Swaps (1)

   

Interest

Rate

Swaps (1)

   

Interest
Rate

Caps

   

Interest

Rate

Swaps (1)

 

Notional amounts at January 1,

  $    $1,496.5   $268.1   $    $157.7 

New contracts

   1,303.8    445.4              155.0 

Acquired contracts (2)

        71.0    1,337.3    25.7      

Matured or expired contracts

        (698.1)     (108.9)     (25.7)     (44.6)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notional amounts at December 31,

  $        1,303.8   $        1,314.8   $        1,496.5   $            —     $        268.1 
2014     
   Foreign Currency Contracts   Interest
Rate
Swaps (2)
 
    Net Investment Contracts   Euro Option
Contracts (1)
   

Notional amounts at January 1

  600    $800    £   $   ¥24,136    $250       $   $71  

New contracts

   1,746     2,354     238     400     79,010     769     365     464     398  

Matured or expired contracts

   (2,046)     (2,754)             (79,010)     (769)     (81)     (110)     (71)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notional amounts at December 31

  300    $400    £    238    $    400    ¥24,136    $250        284    $354    $398  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted Average Forward Rate at December 31

     1.33       1.68       96.54       1.25    

Active contracts at December 31

     4       3       3       8     2  

2013     
   Foreign Currency Contracts   Interest Rate
Swaps (3)
 
    Net Investment Contracts   

Notional amounts at January 1

  1,000    $1,304    ¥   $   $1,315  

New contracts

   600     800     24,136     250      

Matured or expired contracts

   (1,000)     (1,304)             (1,244)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notional amounts at December 31

  600    $800    ¥    24,136    $    250    $71  

2012     
       Foreign Currency Contracts       Interest Rate
Swaps (4)
 
    Net Investment Contracts   

Notional amounts at January 1

     $   $1,497  

New contracts

   1,000     1,304     445  

Acquired contracts

           71  

Matured or expired contracts

           (698)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notional amounts at December 31

  1,000    $1,304    $1,315  

 

(1)During 2014, we exercised three foreign currency option contracts, and recognized a net gain of approximately $1.1 million.

(2)During the third quarter of 2014, we entered into two contracts with a total notional amount of ¥40.9 billion to effectively fix the interest rate on the Yen Term Loan. See Note 9 for more information on the Yen Term Loan.

(3)During 2013, we settled 13 contracts with a notional value of $333.5 million, and contributed 13 contracts with a notional value of $383.9 million related to the transfer of assets to the newly formed PELP co-investment venture. We also settled five contracts in Japan with a notional value of $526.4 million in connection with the contributions of properties to NPR.

(4)In 2012, we entered into four interest rate swap contracts with combined notional amounts of $445.4 million, with various expiration dates between 2017 and 2019. In addition, we acquired one interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of $71.0 million in connection with the acquisition of oura controlling interest in NAIF II. In connection with the Merger and PEPR Acquisition in 2011, we acquired various interest rate swap contracts with combined notional amountsone of $1.3 billion, with various expiration dates between October 2012 and January 2014. During the third quarter of 2010, we entered into a ¥13.0 billion interest rate contract that matures in December 2014 to fix the interest rate on a variable rate TMK bond. We designated these contracts as cash flow hedges and they qualify for hedge accounting treatment.our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.

(2)To the extent these contracts previously qualified for hedge accounting, they were redesignated at the time of the acquisition to qualify for hedge accounting post Merger and acquisition.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

The following table presents the fair value of our derivative instruments (in thousands):

 

   December 31, 2014   December 31, 2013 
    Asset   Liability   AOCI   Asset   Liability   AOCI 

Net investment hedges - euro denominated

  $22,891    $   $37,295    $137    $30,302    $(21,705)  

Net investment hedges - yen denominated

   46,934         56,169     20,104         22,102  

Net investment hedges - pounds sterling denominated

   29,097         29,097              

Foreign currency options - euro denominated (1)

   7,742                      

Interest rate swap hedges (2)

       1,395     (1,395)         5,638     (591)  

Our share of derivatives from unconsolidated co-investment ventures (3)

             (19,545)               (13,851)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total fair value of derivatives

  $106,664    $1,395    $101,621    $20,241    $35,940    $(14,045)  

(1)As discussed above, the foreign currency options are not designated as hedges. We recognized gains of $7.7 million inForeign Currency and Derivative Losses and Related Amortization, Netin the Consolidated Statements of Operations from the change in value of our outstanding foreign currency option contracts for the year ended December 31, 2014.

(2)In connection with the contributions to NPR, we reclassified a loss related to interest rate swaps of $7.8 million during the first quarter of 2013 fromAOCI in the Consolidated Balance Sheets toLosses on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)Items indicated by ‘- - ‘ are not applicable

The change inOther Comprehensive Income (Loss)in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) during the periods presented is due to the translation upon consolidation of the financial statements into U.S. dollars of our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar for which we recorded losses of $614.8 million, $237.6 million and $61.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. It also includes the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and non-derivative instruments. The following table presents the gains and losses associated with the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and non-derivative instruments included inOther Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands):

    2014   2013   2012 

Derivative net investment hedges (1)

  $122,164    $17,847    $        (17,450)  

Interest rate swap hedges (2)

   (804)     (69)     6,651  

Our share of derivatives from unconsolidated co-investment ventures

   (5,694)     19,659     11,335  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gain (loss) on derivative instruments

   115,666     37,437     536  

Non-derivative net investment hedges (3)

   321,196     (14,910)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gain on derivative and non-derivative instruments

  $        436,862    $        22,527    $536  

(1)This includes gains of $6.3 million and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, upon the settlement of net investment hedges.

(2)The amounts reclassified to interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were not considered significant. The amount reclassified to interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012, was $14.7 million. We do not expect the amounts reclassified to interest expense for the next 12 months to be significant.

(3)As discussed in Note 9, we issued €1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) of debt in 2014. This debt was issued by the Operating Partnership, which is a U.S. dollar functional entity, and designated as a non-derivative financial instrument hedge. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had €2.5 billion ($3.0 billion) and €700 million ($1.0 billion) of debt, net of accrued interest, respectively, designated as non-derivative financial instrument hedges of our net investment in international subsidiaries. We had €97.6 million ($118.5 million) of debt that was not designated as a non-derivative financial instrument hedge at December 31, 2014. We recognized unrealized gains of $7.5 million inForeign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on the unhedged portion or our debt in 2014.

Fair Value Measurements

We have estimated the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize upon disposition.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring and Non-Recurring Basis

At December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2011,2013, other than the derivatives discussed in this noteabove and in Note 10,9, we dodid not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in our Consolidated Financial Statements consist of real estate assets and investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities that were subject to impairment charges as discussed in Note 16. The table below aggregates the fair value of these assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, by the levels in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

  2012  2011 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 

Real estate assets

 $          -    $          -    $    3,677,365   $    3,677,365  $          -    $          -    $      122,088  $      122,088 

Investments in and advances to other unconsolidated entities

 $   $   $   $   $   $   $26,066  $26,066 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, We determined the fair value of our derivative instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. TheWe determined the fair values of our interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts or payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments. TheWe based the variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates, or forward curves, derived from observable market interest rate curves. TheWe based the fair values of our net investment hedges are based upon the change in the spot rate at the end of the period as compared to the strike price at inception.

We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.

We have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Although the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties, we assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, all of our derivatives held at December 31, 2014 and 2013, were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Fair Value Measurements on Non-Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements consist of real estate assets and investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities that were subject to impairment charges. There were no assets that met this criteria at December 31, 2014 or 2013.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, our carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we estimated the fair value of our senior notes and exchangeable senior notes has been estimated based upon quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available, the fair value of our Credit Facilities has been estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates and borrowing spreads currently available to us (Level 3), and the fair value of our secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds that do not have current quoted market prices available has been estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 3). The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value in the table below are the result of differences in interest rates and/or borrowing spreads that were available to us at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or acquired.acquired, including reduced borrowing spreads due to our improved credit ratings. The senior notes and many of the issues of secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.

The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our debt at December 31 (in thousands):

   2014   2013 
    Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value 

Credit Facilities

  $   $   $725,483    $725,679  

Senior notes

   6,076,920     6,593,657     5,357,933     5,698,864  

Exchangeable senior notes

   456,766     511,931     438,481     514,381  

Secured mortgage debt

   1,050,591     1,173,488     1,696,597     1,840,829  

Secured mortgage debt of consolidated entities

   1,207,106     1,209,271     239,992     246,324  

Term loans and other debt

   588,816     591,810     552,730     560,714  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt

  $        9,380,199    $        10,080,157    $            9,011,216    $        9,586,791  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our debt as of December 31 (in thousands):

   2012   2011 
    Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value 

Debt:

        

Credit Facilities

  $888,966   $893,577   $936,796   $940,334 

Senior notes

   5,223,136    5,867,124    4,772,607    5,038,678 

Exchangeable senior notes

   876,884    1,007,236    1,315,448    1,431,805 

Secured mortgage debt

   3,625,908    3,765,556    1,725,773     1,832,931 

Secured mortgage debt of consolidated entities

   450,923    455,880    1,468,637     1,485,808 

Other debt of consolidated entities

   67,749    68,751    775,763    751,075 

Other debt

   657,228    660,951    387,384    389,804 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt

  $        11,790,794   $        12,719,075   $        11,382,408   $        11,870,435 

21.19.Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Matters

A majority of the properties we acquire, including land, are subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. In addition, we may incur environmental remediation costs associated with certain land parcels we acquire in connection with the development of the land. We have acquired certain properties in urban and industrial areas that may have been leased to or previously owned by commercial and industrial companies that discharged hazardous materials. We establish a liability at the time of acquisition to cover such costs and adjust the liabilities as appropriate when additional information becomes available. We record our environmental liabilities inOther Liabilitiesin the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We purchase various environmental insurance policies to mitigate our exposure to environmental liabilities. We are not aware of any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Indemnification Agreements

We have indemnification agreements related to certain co-investment ventures operating outside of the United States for the contribution of certain properties. We may enter into agreements whereby we indemnify the ventures, or our venture partners, for taxes that may be assessed with respect to certain properties we contribute to these ventures. Our contributions to these ventures are generally structured as contributions of shares of companies that own the real estate assets. Accordingly, the capital gains associated with the step up in the value of the underlying real estate assets, for tax purposes, are deferred and transferred at contribution. We have generally indemnified these ventures to the extent that the ventures: (i) incur capital gains or withholding tax as a result of a direct sale of the real estate asset, as opposed to a transaction in which the shares of the company owning the real estate asset are transferred or sold or (ii) are required to grant a discount to the buyer of shares under a share transfer transaction as a result of the ventures transferring the embedded capital gain tax liability to the buyer of the shares in the transaction. The agreements limit the amount that is subject to our indemnification with respect to each property to 100% of the actual tax liabilities related to the capital gains that are deferred and transferred by us to the ventures at the time of the initial contribution less any deferred tax assets transferred with the property.

The ultimate outcome under these agreements is uncertain as it is dependent on the method and timing of dissolution of the related venture or disposition of any properties by the venture. Two of our previous agreements were terminated without any amounts being due or payable by us. We consider the probability, timing and amounts in estimating our potential liability under the agreements. Liabilitiesrecord liabilities related to the indemnification agreements are recorded inOther Liabilitiesin ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets. We continue to monitor these agreements and the likelihood of the sale of assets that would result in recognition and will adjust the potential liability in the future as facts and circumstances dictate.

Off-Balance Sheet Liabilities

We have issued performance and surety bonds and standby letters of credit in connection with certain development projects. Performance and surety bonds are commonly required by public agencies from real estate developers. Performance and surety bonds are renewable and expire upon the completion of the improvements and infrastructure. As ofAt December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, we had approximately $27.8$54.5 million and $27.6$25.5 million, respectively, outstanding under such arrangements.

At December 31, 2012, we guaranteed $30.4 million of debt of certain of our unconsolidated entities. We may be required under capital commitments or choose to make additional capital contributions to certain of our unconsolidated entities, representing our proportionate ownership interest, should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development or acquisition costs, repayment of debt or operation shortfalls. See Note 65 for further discussion related to equity commitments to our unconsolidated entities.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Litigation

In the normal course of business, from time to time, we and our unconsolidated entities are parties to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, arbitration hearings began in connection with a dispute related to a real estate development project known as Pacific Commons. The plaintiff, Cisco Technology, Inc., was seeking rescission of a 2007 Restructuring and Settlement Agreement (the “Contract”) and other agreements, and declaratory relief, and damages for breach of the Contract. In August 2012, the arbitrator issued a ruling denying the relief sought by Cisco, and therefore Prologis had no further obligation.

 

22.20.Business Segments

Our current business strategy includes two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and PrivateStrategic Capital. We generate revenues, earnings, net operating income and cash flows through our segments, as follows:

 

Real Estate Operations. This represents the ownership of industrial operating properties and is the main source of our revenue and earnings. We collect rent from our customers through operating leases, including reimbursements for the majority of our operating costs. Each operating property is considered to be an individual operating segment having similar economic characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic location. Our Real Estate Operations segment also includes development, re-development and acquisition activities that lead to rental operations. We develop, re-develop and acquire industrial properties primarily in global and regional markets to meet our customers’ needs. Within this line of business, we capitalize on: (i) the land that we currently own; (ii) the development expertise of our local teams; (iii) our global customer

Real Estate Operations — This represents the direct long-term ownership of industrial operating properties and is the primary source of our core revenue and earnings. We collect rent from our customers under operating leases, including reimbursements for the vast majority of our operating costs. Each operating property is considered to be an individual operating segment having similar economic characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic location. Our real estate operations segment also includes development and re-development activities. We develop and re-develop industrial properties primarily in global and regional markets to meet our customers’ needs. We provide additional value creation by utilizing: (i) the land that we currently own in global and regional markets; (ii) the development expertise of our local personnel; (iii) our global customer relationships; and (iv) the demand for high quality distribution facilities in key markets. Land held for development, properties currently under development and land we own and lease to customers under ground leases are also included in this segment.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

We own real estate in the Americas (Canada, Mexico and the United States), Europe (Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) and Asia (China, Japan and Singapore).NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

Private Capital — This represents the long-term management of unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other joint ventures. We have a direct and long-standing relationships with a significant number of institutional investors. We tailor industrial portfolios to investors’ specific needs and deploy capital in both close-ended and open-ended venture structures and other joint ventures, while providing complete portfolio management and financial reporting services. We recognize fees and incentives earned for services performed on behalf of the unconsolidated entities and certain third parties.

relationships; and (iv) the demand for high-quality distribution facilities. Land held for development, properties currently under development and land we own and lease to customers under ground leases are also included in this segment.

We report the costs associated with our Private Capital segment for all periods presented in the line item Private Capital Expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These costs include the direct expenses associated with the asset management of the co-investment ventures provided by individuals who are assigned to our private capital segment. In addition, in order to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale, all of our property management functions are provided by a team of professionals who are assigned to our real estate operations segment. These individuals perform the property-level management of the properties we own and the properties we manage that are owned by the unconsolidated entities. We allocate the costs of our property management function to the properties we consolidate (reported inRental Expenses) and the properties owned by the unconsolidated entities (included inPrivate Capital Expenses), by using the square feet owned by the respective portfolios. We are further reimbursed by the co-investment ventures for certain expenses associated with managing these co-investment ventures.

Each entity we manage is considered to be an individual operating segment having similar economic characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic location. Our operations in the Private Capital segment are in the Americas (Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States), Europe (Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) and Asia (China and Japan).

We present the operations and net gains associated with properties sold to third parties or classified as held for sale as discontinued operations, which results in the restatement of prior year operating results to exclude the items presented as discontinued operations.

Strategic Capital. This represents the management of unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We invest with partners and investors through our ventures, both private and public. We tailor industrial portfolios to investors’ specific needs and deploy capital with a focus on larger, ventures with longer duration and open-ended funds with leading global institutions. These private and public vehicles provide capital for distinct geographies across our global platform. We hold a significant ownership interest in these ventures; we believe this aligns our interests with those of our partners. We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures through asset management and property management services and we earn additional revenues from leasing, acquisition, construction, development and disposition services provided. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we also earn revenues through promotes during the life of a venture or upon liquidation. Each unconsolidated co-investment venture we manage is considered to be an individual operating segment having similar economic characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic location.

Reconciliations are presented below for: (i) each reportable business segment’s revenue from external customers to ourTotal Revenues; in the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) each reportable business segment’s net operating income from external customers to ourLossEarnings (Loss) before Income Taxes; in the Consolidated Statements of Operations; and (iii) each reportable business segment’s assets to ourTotal Assets. in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our chief operating decision makers rely primarily on net operating income and similar measures to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing segment performance. The applicable components of ourTotal

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Revenues,LossEarnings (Loss) before Income Taxes andTotal Assets are allocated to each reportable business segment’s revenues, net operating income and assets. Items that are not directly assignable to a segment, such as certain corporate income and expenses, are reflected as reconciling items. The following reconciliations are presented in thousands:

 

  Years Ended December 31,   Years Ended December 31, 
  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Revenues (1):

            

Real estate operations:

            

Americas

  $    1,211,462   $842,845   $556,389   $    1,403,564    $    1,288,925    $    1,176,920  

Europe

   436,206    309,575    78,545    74,413     174,397     435,244  

Asia

   231,514    161,288    82,692    62,939     107,692     221,575  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Real Estate Operations segment

   1,879,182    1,313,708    717,626    1,540,916     1,571,014     1,833,739  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Private capital:

      

Strategic capital:

      

Americas

   69,422    76,872    66,653    95,168     72,474     69,422  

Europe

   37,047    46,087    54,835    86,549     63,794     37,047  

Asia

   20,310    14,660    1,038    38,154     43,204     20,310  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Private Capital segment

   126,779    137,619    122,526 

Total Strategic Capital segment

   219,871     179,472     126,779  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total revenues

  $2,005,961   $    1,451,327   $840,152   $1,760,787    $1,750,486    $1,960,518  

Net operating income:

            

Real estate operations:

            

Americas

  $841,319   $584,081   $397,708   $1,000,773    $899,053    $818,393  

Europe

   326,126    223,950    43,452    40,627     116,178     325,571  

Asia

   179,682    123,087    60,912    45,262     76,863     171,980  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Real Estate Operations segment

   1,347,127    931,118    502,072    1,086,662     1,092,094     1,315,944  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Private capital:

      

Strategic capital:

      

Americas

   31,637    42,644    40,354    42,042     18,785     31,637  

Europe

   21,699    30,708    41,200    57,266     41,263     21,699  

Asia

   9,623    9,305    313    24,067     30,145     9,623  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Private Capital segment

   62,959    82,657    81,867 

Total Strategic Capital segment

   123,375     90,193     62,959  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total segment net operating income

   1,410,086    1,013,775    583,939    1,210,037     1,182,287     1,378,903  

Reconciling items:

      

General and administrative expenses

   (228,068)     (195,161)     (165,981)  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

   (80,676)     (140,495)       

Impairment of real estate properties

   (252,914)     (21,237)     (736,612)  

Depreciation and amortization

   (739,981)     (552,849)     (294,867)  

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

   31,676    59,935    23,678 

Interest expense

   (507,484)     (468,072)     (461,166)  

Impairment of goodwill and other assets

   (16,135)     (126,432)     (412,745)  

Interest and other income, net

   22,878    12,008    15,847 

Gains on acquisitions and dispositions of investments in real estate, net

   305,607    111,684    28,488 

Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net

   (20,497)     41,172    (11,081)  

Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net

   (14,114)     258    (201,486)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total reconciling items

   (1,499,708)     (1,279,189)     (2,215,925)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Loss before income taxes

  $(89,622)    $(265,414)    $    (1,631,986)  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

   Years Ended December 31, 
    2014   2013   2012 

Reconciling items:

      

General and administrative expenses

   (247,768)     (229,207)     (228,068)  

Depreciation and amortization

   (642,461)     (648,668)     (724,262)  

Merger, acquisition and other integration expenses

           (80,676)  

Impairment of real estate properties

           (252,914)  

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net

   134,288     97,220     31,676  

Interest expense

   (308,885)     (379,327)     (505,215)  

Interest and other income, net

   25,768     26,948     22,878  

Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net

   725,790     597,656     305,607  

Foreign currency and derivative losses and related amortization, net

   (17,841)     (33,633)     (20,497)  

Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net

   (165,300)     (277,014)     (14,114)  

Impairment of other assets

           (16,135)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total reconciling items

   (496,409)     (846,025)     (1,481,720)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

  $713,628    $336,262    $(102,817)  

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2012   2011   2014   2013 

Assets (2):

        

Real estate operations:

        

Americas

  $    15,304,053   $    13,305,147   $    17,432,909    $    16,272,868  

Europe

   5,738,257    6,823,814    1,820,529     1,634,867  

Asia

   3,476,996    3,502,033    926,645     1,176,774  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Real Estate Operations segment

   24,519,306    23,630,994    20,180,083     19,084,509  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Private capital (3):

    

Strategic capital (3):

    

Americas

   24,373    43,394    20,635     22,154  

Europe

   61,266    61,946    54,577     60,327  

Asia

   6,108    9,368    2,718     3,634  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Private Capital segment

   91,747    114,708 

Total Strategic Capital segment

   77,930     86,115  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total segment assets

   24,611,053    23,745,702    20,258,013     19,170,624  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Reconciling items:

        

Investments in and advances to other unconsolidated entities

   2,195,782    2,857,755 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities

   4,824,724     4,430,239  

Assets held for sale

   43,934     4,042  

Notes receivable backed by real estate

   188,000    322,834        188,000  

Assets held for sale

   26,027    444,850 

Cash and cash equivalents

   100,810    176,072    350,692     491,129  

Other assets

   188,473    176,699    340,860     288,273  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total reconciling items

   2,699,092    3,978,210    5,560,210     5,401,683  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

  $27,310,145   $27,723,912   $25,818,223    $24,572,307  

 

(1)Includes revenues attributable to the United States for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 2011 and 2010 of $1.2$1.4 billion, $0.8$1.1 billion and $0.6$1.1 billion, respectively.

 

(2)Includes long-lived assets attributable to the United States as ofat December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 of $14.9$17.3 billion and $14.3$15.3 billion, respectively.

 

(3)Represents management contracts and goodwill recorded in connection with business combinations and goodwill associated with the PrivateStrategic Capital segment. Goodwill was $25.3 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

23.21.Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Non-cashSignificant non-cash investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 2011 and 2010 are as follows:discussed below.

 

See Note 3 for information relatedWe capitalized $21.6 million, $18.8 million and $10.6 million of equity-based compensation expense due to the Mergerour development and PEPR Acquisition in 2011leasing activities during 2014, 2013 and the Co-Investment Venture Acquisitions in 2012.2012, respectively.

 

WeAs partial consideration for properties we contributed to FIBRA Prologis and the conclusion of an unconsolidated co-investment venture during 2014, we received ownership interests in FIBRA Prologis initially valued at $609.7 million and FIBRA Prologis assumed $345.1 million of secured mortgage debt associated with the properties. See Note 4 for additional information. In 2013, as partial consideration for contributions and dispositions, the buyers assumed debt of $194.9 million.

As partial consideration for properties we contributed to PELP during the first quarter of 2013, we received ownership interests initially valued at $1.3 billion, representing a 50% ownership interest in PELP, and PELP assumed $353.2 million of secured mortgage debt.

During 2013 and 2012, we received $31.2 million and $17.7 million, $5.0 million and $4.6 million ofrepresenting ownership interests in certain unconsolidated entities as a portion of our proceeds from the contribution of properties to these entities, during 2012, 2011excluding PELP and 2010, respectively.FIBRA Prologis.

 

In April 2011, we assumed $61.7 millionSee Note 3 for information related to acquisitions of debt upon the acquisition of the remaining interestcontrolling interests in a joint venture that owned one propertyour unconsolidated co-investment ventures in Japan.2014, 2013 and 2012.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

 

 

24.22.Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Selected quarterly 2012 and 2011 data has been adjusted from previously disclosed amounts due to the disposal of properties in 2012 whose results of operations were reclassified toDiscontinued Operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The selected quarterly data was as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

  Three Months Ended, 
REIT March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31, 

2012:

    

Total revenues

 $        480,875  $        503,110  $504,419  $517,557 

Operating income (loss)

 $85,589  $101,789  $80,375  $(159,306)  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $189,677  $(11,442)   $(4,519)   $(266,918)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $202,412  $(8,119)   $(46,526)   $(228,713)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders - Basic (1)

 $0.44  $(0.02)   $(0.10)   $(0.50)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders - Diluted (1)(2)

 $0.44  $(0.02)   $(0.10)   $(0.50)  

2011(3):

    

Total revenues

 $222,084  $310,326  $462,141  $456,777 

Operating income (loss)

 $26,929  $(50,833)   $78,286  $49,651 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $(53,807)   $(164,974)   $41,714  $(90,123)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $(46,616)   $(151,471)   $55,436  $(45,459)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders - Basic (1)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.49)   $0.12  $(0.10)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders -
Diluted (1)(2)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.49)   $0.12  $(0.10)  

Operating Partnership

                

2012:

    

Total revenues

 $480,875  $503,110  $504,419  $517,557 

Operating income (loss)

 $85,589  $101,789  $80,375  $(159,306)  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $189,677  $(11,442)   $(4,519)   $(266,918)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders

 $203,353  $(8,173)   $(4,668)   $(229,610)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders - Basic (1)

 $0.44  $(0.02)   $(0.10)   $(0.50)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders - Diluted (1)(2)

 $0.44  $(0.02)   $(0.10)   $(0.50)  

2011(3):

    

Total revenues

 $222,084  $310,326  $462,141  $456,777 

Operating income (loss)

 $26,929  $(50,833)   $78,286  $49,651 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $(53,807)   $(164,974)   $41,714  $(90,123)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $(46,616)   $(151,471)   $54,906  $(45,278)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders - Basic (1)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.49)   $0.12  $(0.10)  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders -
Diluted (1)(2)(4)

 $(0.18)   $(0.49)   $0.12  $(0.10)  
  Three Months Ended, 
Prologis, Inc. March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31, 

2014:

    

Total revenues

 $        434,682   $        460,089   $415,151   $450,865  

Operating income

 $71,466   $95,274   $78,112   $74,956  

Earnings from continuing operations

 $12,003   $152,430   $147,127   $427,724  

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders

 $4,666   $72,715   $136,245   $408,609  

Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic (1)

 $0.01   $0.15   $0.27   $0.82  

Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted (1)(2)

 $0.01   $0.13   $0.23   $0.81  

2013:

    

Total revenues

 $479,971   $410,693   $423,058   $436,764  

Operating income

 $97,039   $58,514   $77,380   $71,479  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $289,306   $(20,591)   $(48,671)   $9,485  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 $265,416   $(1,517)   $(7,534)   $59,057  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic (1)

 $0.58   $0.00  $(0.02)   $0.12  

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders - Diluted (1)(2)

 $0.57   $0.00  $(0.02)   $0.12  

Prologis, L.P.

                

2014:

    

Total revenues

 $434,682   $460,089   $415,151   $450,865  

Operating income

 $71,466   $95,274   $78,112   $74,956  

Earnings from continuing operations

 $12,003   $152,430   $147,127   $427,724  

Net earnings attributable to common unitholders

 $4,683   $72,973   $136,738   $410,042  

Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic (1)

 $0.01   $0.15   $0.27   $0.82  

Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted (1) (2)

 $0.01   $0.13   $0.23   $0.81  

2013:

    

Total revenues

 $479,971   $410,693   $423,058   $436,764  

Operating income

 $97,039   $58,514   $77,380   $71,479  

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 $289,306   $(20,591)   $(48,671)   $9,485  

Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders

 $266,548   $(1,592)   $(7,582)   $59,256  

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Basic (1)

 $0.58   $0.00  $(0.02)   $0.12  

Net earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders - Diluted (1)(2)

 $0.57   $0.00  $(0.02)   $0.12  

 

(1)Quarterly earnings (loss) per common shareshare/unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and the changes in the number of weighted common sharesshares/units outstanding and included in the calculation of diluted shares.shares/units.

 

(2)InIncome (loss) allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent has been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods with a net loss,since the inclusion of any incremental shares is anti-dilutive, and therefore, both basic and diluted loss per shareshare/unit is the same.

(3)Included in 2011 quarterly data is approximately one month of activity from the Merger and PEPR Acquisition in the period ended June 30, 2011 and a full period of activity in the periods ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011. See Note 3 for more information.

(4)As a result of the Merger, each outstanding common share of ProLogis was converted into 0.4464 of a newly issued share of common stock of the REIT. Therefore, the historical ProLogis data related to quarterly earnings per common share for the periods ended before June 3, 2011 were adjusted by the Merger conversion ratio of 0.4464 and restated.

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

25.Subsequent Event

Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc.

On December 12, we announced the approval from our Board to sponsor a Japanese REIT (“J-REIT”) to serve as the long-term investment vehicle for our properties developed in Japan. In early 2013, we launched the initial public offering for Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”). On February 14, 2013, NPR was listed on the Japan Stock Exchange and commenced trading. At that time, NPR acquired a portfolio of twelve properties from us for an aggregate purchase price of ¥173 billion ($1.9 billion), resulting in ¥153 billion ($1.7 billion at February 14, 2013) in net cash proceeds. We will retain at least a 15% equity ownership interest in NPR and will provide pipeline, operational and personnel assistance under a support agreement. As a result of this transaction, in the first quarter we will recognize a gain of approximately $300 million (unaudited) after the deferral of the gain related to our ongoing investment. We intend to use the proceeds primarily for the repayment of debt and future investment in Japan.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorDirectors and Stockholders

Prologis, Inc.:

Under date of February 27, 2013,25, 2015, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012.2014. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.

In our opinion, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 201325, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Prologis, L.P.:

Under date of February 27, 2013,25, 2015, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012.2014. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.

In our opinion, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 201325, 2015

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Industrial Operating Properties (d)

                    

Americas Markets:

          

North American Markets:

          

United States:

                    

Atlanta, Georgia

                    

Atlanta Airport Dist Ctr

  3   (d)  2,510    10,830    126    2,510    10,956    13,466    (86)   2014

Atlanta NE at Sugarloaf

  1   (d)  620    2,621    28    620    2,649    3,269    (20)   2014

Atlanta NE Distribution Center

  8   (d)  5,582   3,047   28,671   6,276   31,024   37,300   (15,893)   1996, 1997  8   (d)  5,582    3,047    30,356    6,276    32,709    38,985    (17,908)   1996, 1997

Atlanta South Business Park

  9    5,353   28,895   1,213   5,353   30,108   35,461   (1,687)   2011  9     5,353    28,895    2,478    5,353    31,373    36,726    (4,056)   2011

Atlanta West Distribution Center

  7   (d)  7,274   26,566   10,269   7,274   36,835   44,109   (11,917)   1994, 2006, 2012  6   (d)  6,684    23,463    9,898    6,684    33,361    40,045    (11,543)   1994, 2006, 2012

Berkeley Lake Distribution Center

  1   (d)  2,046   8,712   699   2,046   9,411   11,457   (1,504)   2006  1   (d)  2,046    8,712    742    2,046    9,454    11,500    (2,048)   2006

Breckenridge Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  1,645    7,030       1,645    7,030    8,675    (55)   2014

Buford Distribution Center

  1    1,487       5,502   1,487   5,502   6,989   (802)   2007  1     1,487       5,577    1,487    5,577    7,064    (1,219)   2007

Carter-Pacific Bus Ctr

  3   (d)  1,484    6,269    12    1,484    6,281    7,765    (69)   2014

Cobb Place Dist Ctr

  2   (d)  3,195   13,604   122   3,195   13,726   16,921   (450)   2012  2   (d)  2,970    12,702    218    2,970    12,920    15,890    (1,413)   2012

Dekalb Ind Ctr

  1   (d)  1,509   6,584   8   1,509   6,592   8,101   (259)   2012  1     1,401    6,154    1,451    1,401    7,605    9,006    (819)   2012

Douglas Hill Distribution Center

  4    11,599   46,826   3,122   11,677   49,870   61,547   (11,766)   2005  4     11,599    46,826    3,674    11,677    50,422    62,099    (15,482)   2005

Hartsfield East DC

  1    697   6,466   7   697   6,473   7,170   (309)   2011  1     697    6,466    268    697    6,734    7,431    (703)   2011

Horizon Distribution Center

  1    2,846   11,385   1,202   2,846   12,587   15,433   (1,976)   2006  1     2,846    11,385    1,515    2,846    12,900    15,746    (2,699)   2006

LaGrange Distribution Center

  1    174   986   832   174   1,818   1,992   (1,238)   1994

Macon Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  649   2,871       649   2,871   3,520   (138)   2012  1     604    2,691    633    604    3,324    3,928    (438)   2012

Midland Distribution Center

  1    1,919   7,679   1,468   1,919   9,147   11,066   (1,990)   2006  1     1,919    7,679    1,506    1,919    9,185    11,104    (2,723)   2006

Northeast Industrial Center

  5   (d)  3,676   17,212   2,794   3,676   20,006   23,682   (5,406)   2006, 2012  3     3,142    14,036    2,706    3,142    16,742    19,884    (3,762)   1996, 2012

Northmont Industrial Center

  1    566   3,209   1,358   566   4,567   5,133   (2,906)   1994  1     566    3,209    1,482    566    4,691    5,257    (3,250)   1994

Olympic Ind Ctr

  2   (d)  2,156    9,417    15    2,156    9,432    11,588    (107)   2014

Park I-75 South

  1     8,369       35,435    8,382    35,422    43,804    (1,151)   2013

Peachtree Corners Business Center

  5    1,519   7,253   2,969   1,519   10,222   11,741   (4,993)   1994, 2006  4     707    4,685    2,342    707    7,027    7,734    (4,800)   1994

Piedmont Ct. Distribution Center

  2    885   5,013   3,628   885   8,641   9,526   (5,028)   1997  2     885    5,013    3,929    885    8,942    9,827    (5,731)   1997

Riverside Distribution Center (ATL)

  3    2,533   13,336   3,664   2,556   16,977   19,533   (8,358)   1999  4   (d)  3,306    16,750    4,300    3,329    21,027    24,356    (9,692)   1999, 2014

South Royal Atlanta Distribution Center

  2   (d)  1,259   5,990   1,332   1,259   7,322   8,581   (1,133)   2002, 2012

Southfield-KRDC Industrial SG

  8    5,033   28,725   832   5,033   29,557   34,590   (1,962)   2011  8     5,033    28,725    1,837    5,033    30,562    35,595    (4,634)   2011

Southside Distribution Center

  1    1,186   2,859   400   1,186   3,259   4,445   (229)   2011  1     1,186    2,859    595    1,186    3,454    4,640    (589)   2011

Suwanee Creek Dist Ctr

  1    462   1,871   26   462   1,897   2,359   (165)   2010  2     1,045    4,201    202    1,045    4,403    5,448    (448)   2010, 2013

Tradeport Distribution Center

  3   (d)  1,464   4,563   7,559   1,479   12,107   13,586   (7,140)   1994, 1996  3   (d)  1,464    4,563    8,022    1,479    12,570    14,049    (7,923)   1994, 1996

Weaver Distribution Center

  2    935   5,182   2,160   935   7,342   8,277   (4,684)   1995  2     935    5,182    2,351    935    7,533    8,468    (5,243)   1995

Westfork Industrial Center

  2   (d)  579   3,910   164   579   4,074   4,653   (2,399)   1995  2   (d)  579    3,910    428    579    4,338    4,917    (2,749)   1995

Westgate Ind Ctr

  5   (d)  3,096   13,637   505   3,096   14,142   17,238   (549)   2012  1     1,277    5,620    214    1,277    5,834    7,111    (757)   2012
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Atlanta, Georgia

  78    67,523   276,381   80,506   68,333   356,077   424,410   (94,881)     80     80,097    292,940    122,340    80,920    414,457    495,377    (112,117)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Austin, Texas

                    

Corridor Park Corporate Center

  4     4,579    19,046    75    4,579    19,121    23,700    (1,024)   2014

MET 4-12 LTD

  1    4,300   20,456   98   4,300   20,554   24,854   (1,242)   2011  1     4,300    20,456    268    4,300    20,724    25,024    (2,743)   2011

MET PHASE 1 95 LTD

  4    5,593   17,211   702   5,593   17,913   23,506   (1,032)   2011  4     5,593    17,211    1,286    5,593    18,497    24,090    (2,474)   2011

Montopolis Distribution Center

  1    580   3,384   2,475   580   5,859   6,439   (3,640)   1994  1     580    3,384    2,585    580    5,969    6,549    (4,257)   1994

Southpark Corporate Center

  3     1,470    6,154    1    1,470    6,155    7,625    (47)   2014

Walnut Creek Corporate Center

  3    461   4,089   314   515   4,349   4,864   (2,733)   1994  17   (d)  11,152    49,110    411    11,206    49,467    60,673    (3,468)   1994, 2014
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Austin, Texas

  9    10,934   45,140   3,589   10,988   48,675   59,663   (8,647)     30     27,674    115,361    4,626    27,728    119,933    147,661    (14,013)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Baltimore/Washington

                    

1901 Park 100 Drive

  1    2,409   7,227   899   2,409   8,126   10,535   (1,940)   2006  1   (d)  2,409    7,227    1,148    2,409    8,375    10,784    (2,616)   2006

Airport Commons Distribution Center

  2   (d)  2,320       9,049   2,360   9,009   11,369   (3,953)   1997  2   (d)  2,320       10,570    2,360    10,530    12,890    (4,648)   1997

Ardmore Distribution Center

  3    1,431   8,110   2,601   1,431   10,711   12,142   (6,435)   1994

Ardmore Industrial Center

  2    984   5,581   1,462   985   7,042   8,027   (4,588)   1994

Beltway Distribution

  1    9,211   33,922   335   9,211   34,257   43,468   (1,955)   2011  1     9,211    33,922    426    9,211    34,348    43,559    (4,486)   2011

BWI Cargo Center E

  1        10,725    108       10,833    10,833    (4,598)   2011

Corcorde Industrial Center

  4   (d)  1,538   8,717   3,729   1,538   12,446   13,984   (7,877)   1995  4   (d)  1,538    8,717    4,711    1,538    13,428    14,966    (8,832)   1995

Corridor Industrial

  1    1,921   7,224       1,921   7,224   9,145   (431)   2011  1     1,921    7,224    12    1,921    7,236    9,157    (975)   2011

Crysen Industrial

  1    2,285   6,267   350   2,285   6,617   8,902   (417)   2011  1     2,285    6,267    454    2,285    6,721    9,006    (1,001)   2011

DeSoto Business Park

  6    2,709   12,892   8,869   2,710   21,760   24,470   (10,848)   1996, 2007

Gateway Bus Ctr

  10   (d)  30,263    26,530    36,269    30,400    62,662    93,062    (849)   2012, 2014

Gateway Distribution Center

  3    2,628   5,960   4,616   3,268   9,936   13,204   (1,883)   1998, 2012  3     2,523    5,715    4,817    3,164    9,891    13,055    (2,539)   1998, 2012

Granite Hill Dist. Center

  2    2,959   9,344   47   2,959   9,391   12,350   (679)   2011  2     2,959    9,344    74    2,959    9,418    12,377    (1,551)   2011

Greenwood Industrial

  3    6,828   24,253   449   6,828   24,702   31,530   (1,482)   2011  3     6,828    24,253    583    6,828    24,836    31,664    (3,379)   2011

Hampton Central Dist Ctr

  3   (d)  8,928    28,015    64    8,928    28,079    37,007    (214)   2014

IAD Cargo Center 5

  1        43,060    75       43,135    43,135    (25,257)   2011

Meadowridge Distribution Center

  1   (d)  1,757       6,403   1,902   6,258   8,160   (2,592)   1998  3   (d)  7,827    18,990    6,527    7,972    25,372    33,344    (3,134)   1998, 2014

Meadowridge Industrial

  3    4,845   20,576   1,266   4,845   21,842   26,687   (1,068)   2011  3     4,845    20,576    4,091    4,845    24,667    29,512    (2,769)   2011

Patuxent Range Road

  2    2,281   9,638   313   2,281   9,951   12,232   (584)   2011  2     2,281    9,638    1,243    2,281    10,881    13,162    (1,472)   2011

Preston Court

  1    2,326   10,146   23   2,326   10,169   12,495   (595)   2011  1     2,326    10,146    202    2,326    10,348    12,674    (1,372)   2011

ProLogis Park - Dulles

  3   (d)  8,407   20,321   218   8,407   20,539   28,946   (634)   2012  7   (d)  16,703    36,268    576    16,703    36,844    53,547    (2,189)   2012, 2014

Troy Hill Dist Ctr

  2   (d)  2,198   9,426   13   2,198   9,439   11,637   (312)   2012  3   (d)  9,179    31,489    27    9,179    31,516    40,695    (1,298)   2012, 2014
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Baltimore/Washington

  41    59,037   199,604   40,642   59,864   239,419   299,283   (48,273)     52     114,346    338,106    71,977    115,309    409,120    524,429    (73,179)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Boston, Massachusetts

                    

Boston Industrial

  9    21,160   45,009   (1,796  21,164   43,209   64,373   (3,583)   2011  4     11,810    25,975    (238  11,810    25,737    37,547    (5,254)   2011

Cabot Business Park

  9    15,977   41,088   (6,071  15,977   35,017   50,994   (3,055)   2011

Cabot Business Park SGP

  3    6,380   19,563   (1,282  6,380   18,281   24,661   (1,548)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Boston, Massachusetts

  21    43,517   105,660   (9,149  43,521   96,507   140,028   (8,186)     4     11,810    25,975    (238  11,810    25,737    37,547    (5,254)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Central & Eastern, Pennsylvania

                    

Carlisle Dist Ctr

  1    (d)    12,535   52,987       12,535   52,987   65,522   (1,712)   2012  6   (d)  54,852    233,619    6,048    54,852    239,667    294,519    (15,392)   2012, 2013

Chambersburg Dist Ctr

  1     4,188    17,796    76    4,188    17,872    22,060    (924)   2013

Harrisburg Distribution Center

  1    2,231   12,572   651   2,231   13,223   15,454   (3,844)   2004  5     21,950    96,007    1,946    21,950    97,953    119,903    (9,168)   2004, 2013

Harrisburg Industrial Center

  1    782   6,190   890   782   7,080   7,862   (2,064)   2002  1     782    6,190    1,581    782    7,771    8,553    (2,461)   2002

I-78 Dist. Center

  1    13,030   30,007   131   13,030   30,138   43,168   (1,606)   2011  1     13,030    30,007    335    13,030    30,342    43,372    (3,655)   2011

I-81 Distribution

  1    1,822   21,583   161   1,822   21,744   23,566   (1,130)   2011  1     1,822    21,583    328    1,822    21,911    23,733    (2,575)   2011

Kraft Distribution Center

  1     7,450    23,863       7,450    23,863    31,313    (187)   2014

Lehigh Valley Distribution Center

  3    2,356   9,552   3,231   2,356   12,783   15,139   (2,956)   2004, 2010  8   (d)  26,795    89,400    24,540    26,875    113,860    140,735    (7,994)   2004, 2010, 2013,

2014

Northport Ind Ctr

  1   (d)  12,282    39,621    1    12,282    39,622    51,904    (314)   2014

Park 33 Distribution Center

  1   (d  13,411       41,071   15,698   38,784   54,482   (3,508)   2007  2     28,947    49,500    41,138    31,207    88,378    119,585    (6,061)   2007, 2014

PHL Cargo Center C2

  1        11,966    25       11,991    11,991    (4,327)   2011

Pottsville Dist Ctr

  1    4,720   20,464   118   4,720   20,582   25,302   (694)   2012  1     4,486    19,527    907    4,486    20,434    24,920    (2,249)   2012

Quakertown Distribution Center

  1    6,966       27,691   6,966   27,691   34,657   (4,555)   2006  1     6,966       27,698    6,966    27,698    34,664    (5,960)   2006
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Central & Eastern, Pennsylvania

  11    57,853   153,355   73,944   60,140   225,012   285,152   (22,069)     30     183,550    639,079    104,623    185,890    741,362    927,252    (61,267)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Central Valley, CA

                    

Arch Road Logistics Center

  2   (d  9,492   38,060   1,229   9,492   39,289   48,781   (2,825)   2010  2   (d)  9,492    38,060    2,310    9,492    40,370    49,862    (5,680)   2010

Central Valley Distribution Center

  3   (d)  5,339    32,838    526    5,339    33,364    38,703    (266)   2014

Central Valley Industrial Center

  4   (d  11,418   48,726   7,631   11,868   55,907   67,775   (21,065)   1999, 2002, 2005  5   (d)  14,110    65,026    8,648    14,560    73,224    87,784    (25,728)   1999, 2002, 2005,

2014

Chabot Commerce Ctr

  2    5,222   13,697   3,307   5,222   17,004   22,226   (1,285)   2011  2     5,222    13,697    6,601    5,222    20,298    25,520    (3,516)   2011

Duck Creek Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  6,690    39,683       6,690    39,683    46,373    (300)   2014

Manteca Distribution Center

  1    9,280   27,840   395   9,480   28,035   37,515   (6,825)   2005  1     9,280    27,840    591    9,480    28,231    37,711    (8,733)   2005

Patterson Pass Business Center

  3   (d  9,762   24,636   5,535   9,774   30,159   39,933   (1,695)   2007, 2012  4   (d)  10,004    27,878    7,397    10,017    35,262    45,279    (3,868)   2007, 2012, 2014

Tracy Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  2,056    12,248       2,056    12,248    14,304    (93)   2014

Tracy II Distribution Center

  4    9,707   32,080   75,666   15,048   102,405   117,453   (10,378)   2007, 2009, 2012  5     23,905    32,080    152,468    29,246    179,207    208,453    (19,640)   2007, 2009, 2012,

2013

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Central Valley, CA

  16    54,881   185,039   93,763   60,884   272,799   333,683   (44,073)     24     86,098    289,350    178,541    92,102    461,887    553,989    (67,824)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Charlotte, North Carolina

                    

Charlotte Distribution Center

  9   (d  4,578       27,620   6,096   26,102   32,198   (14,041)   1995, 1996, 1997, 1998  11   (d)  6,596    8,581    28,810    8,114    35,873    43,987    (15,719)   1995, 1996, 1997,

1998, 2014

Northpark Distribution Center

  2   (d  1,183   6,707   2,611   1,184   9,317   10,501   (5,663)   1994, 1998  2   (d)  1,183    6,707    2,919    1,184    9,625    10,809    (6,353)   1994, 1998

Ridge Creek Dist Ctr

  1   (d  2,074   9,044   35   2,074   9,079   11,153   (308)   2012

West Pointe Business Center

  2    5,440   12,953   9,590   5,440   22,543   27,983   (2,200)   2006,2012  5   (d)  12,138    40,423    9,893    12,138    50,316    62,454    (4,220)   2006, 2012, 2014

Wilson Business Park Distribution Center

  1    968   5,598   79   968   5,677   6,645   (1,155)   2007
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Charlotte, North Carolina

  15    14,243   34,302   39,935   15,762   72,718   88,480   (23,367)     18     19,917    55,711    41,622    21,436    95,814    117,250    (26,292)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Chicago, Illinois

                    

Addison Business Center

  1    1,293   2,907   396   1,293   3,303   4,596   (173)   2011  1     1,293    2,907    515    1,293    3,422    4,715    (488)   2011

Addison Distribution Center

  1    640   3,661   1,191   640   4,852   5,492   (2,632)   1997  1     640    3,661    1,834    640    5,495    6,135    (3,037)   1997

Alsip Distribution Center

  2    2,093   11,859   11,042   2,549   22,445   24,994   (13,534)   1997,1999  1     1,416    9,009    9,086    1,724    17,787    19,511    (12,168)   1997

Alsip Industrial

  1    1,422   2,336       1,422   2,336   3,758   (296)   2011  1     1,422    2,336    22    1,422    2,358    3,780    (670)   2011

Arlington Heights Distribution Center

  1    831   3,326   1,140   831   4,466   5,297   (1,000)   2006  1     831    3,326    2,345    831    5,671    6,502    (1,582)   2006

Bensenville Distribution Center

  1    926   3,842   6,146   940   9,974   10,914   (6,571)   1997  1     926    3,842    6,319    940    10,147    11,087    (7,198)   1997

Bensenville Ind Park

  13    37,681   92,909   1,853   37,681   94,762   132,443   (6,321)   2011  13     37,681    92,909    5,219    37,681    98,128    135,809    (14,800)   2011

Bloomingdale 100 Business Center

  4   (d)  6,563    27,579    68    6,563    27,647    34,210    (210)   2014

Bolingbrook Distribution Center

  5   (d  15,110   68,440   3,694   15,110   72,134   87,244   (22,359)   1999,2006  6   (d)  19,068    85,317    5,355    19,068    90,672    109,740    (27,639)   1999, 2006, 2014

Bridgeview Dist Ctr

  4   (d)  1,662    7,726       1,662    7,726    9,388    (92)   2014

Bridgeview Industrial

  1    1,380   3,404   310   1,380   3,714   5,094   (245)   2011  1     1,380    3,404    404    1,380    3,808    5,188    (616)   2011

Chicago Industrial Portfolio

  1    1,330   2,876   81   1,330   2,957   4,287   (225)   2011  1     1,330    2,876    423    1,330    3,299    4,629    (561)   2011

Chicago Ridge Freight Terminal

  1    1,789   6,187   243   1,789   6,430   8,219   (327)   2011

Des Plaines Distribution Center

  3   (d  2,158   12,232   5,763   2,159   17,994   20,153   (11,323)   1995,1996  3     2,158    12,232    6,884    2,159    19,115    21,274    (12,660)   1995, 1996

District Industrial

  1    993   1,364       993   1,364   2,357   (112)   2011

Elk Grove Distribution Center

  23   (d  31,138   82,034   46,202   31,138   128,236   159,374   (43,759)   1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2006, 2009  20   (d)  30,227    78,013    49,831    30,227    127,844    158,071    (50,971)   1995, 1996, 1997,

1999,

2006, 2009

Elk Grove Du Page

  24   (d  17,552   71,359   (1,150  16,402   71,359   87,761   (431)   2012  21   (d)  14,830    64,408    10,528    14,830    74,936    89,766    (8,108)   2012

Elk Grove Village SG

  9    9,580   18,750   772   9,580   19,522   29,102   (1,540)   2011  6     6,367    12,010    859    6,367    12,869    19,236    (2,314)   2011

Elmhurst Distribution Center

  1    713   4,043   1,140   713   5,183   5,896   (2,992)   1997  1     713    4,043    1,240    713    5,283    5,996    (3,345)   1997

Executive Drive

  1    1,371   6,430   93   1,371   6,523   7,894   (380)   2011  1     1,371    6,430    509    1,371    6,939    8,310    (887)   2011

Glendale Heights Distribution Center

  3   (d  3,903   22,119   3,252   3,903   25,371   29,274   (12,296)   1999  3   (d)  3,903    22,119    4,423    3,903    26,542    30,445    (14,410)   1999

Glenview Distribution Center

  2    1,156   6,550   1,976   1,156   8,526   9,682   (4,623)   1996, 1999

Golf Distribution

  1   (d  5,372   16,619   7   5,372   16,626   21,998   (1,273)   2011

Gurnee Dist Ctr

  2     2,297    9,991       2,297    9,991    12,288    (97)   2014

Hintz Building

  1    354   1,970   9   354   1,979   2,333   (125)   2011  1     354    1,970    103    354    2,073    2,427    (289)   2011

I-294 Dist Ctr

  1    4,581   19,408       4,581   19,408   23,989   (629)   2012  3   (d)  7,922    33,730    15    7,922    33,745    41,667    (1,929)   2012, 2014

I-55 Distribution Center

  2   (d  5,383   25,504   34,402   11,786   53,503   65,289   (9,105)   2007  2   (d)  5,383    25,504    35,513    11,786    54,614    66,400    (14,082)   2007

I-80 Morris

  1     6,349    27,134       6,349    27,134    33,483    (213)   2014

Itasca Distribution Center

  2    604   3,382   1,515   585   4,916   5,501   (2,738)   1996, 1997  2   (d)  1,522    7,119    1,562    1,522    8,681    10,203    (1,968)   1996, 2014

Itasca Industrial Portfolio

  4    5,942   13,574   42   5,942   13,616   19,558   (932)   2011  3     3,053    5,879    245    3,053    6,124    9,177    (938)   2011

Kehoe Industrial

  1    1,394   3,247   335   1,394   3,582   4,976   (180)   2011  1     1,394    3,247    446    1,394    3,693    5,087    (459)   2011

Lombard Distribution Center

  1    1,170   6,630   840   1,170   7,470   8,640   (3,508)   1999

Melrose Park Distribution Ctr.

  1    2,657   9,292   17   2,657   9,309   11,966   (682)   2011  1     2,657    9,292    283    2,657    9,575    12,232    (1,584)   2011

Minooka Distribution Center

  2   (d  12,240   41,745   16,934   13,223   57,696   70,919   (12,450)   2005, 2008  3   (d)  18,420    68,912    17,991    19,404    85,919    105,323    (16,871)   2005, 2008, 2014

Mitchell Distribution Center

  1    1,236   7,004   3,744   1,236   10,748   11,984   (6,025)   1996  1     1,236    7,004    3,748    1,236    10,752    11,988    (6,970)   1996

NDP - Chicago

  1    461   1,362       461   1,362   1,823   (80)   2011  1     461    1,362    27    461    1,389    1,850    (183)   2011

Nicholas Logistics Center

  1    2,354   10,799       2,354   10,799   13,153   (769)   2011  1     2,354    10,799    44    2,354    10,843    13,197    (1,744)   2011

Northbrook Distribution Center

  1    2,056   8,227   374   2,056   8,601   10,657   (1,708)   2007

Northlake Distribution Center

  1    372   2,105   725   372   2,830   3,202   (1,817)   1996

OHare Industrial Portfolio

  10    6,941   16,888   33   6,941   16,921   23,862   (1,348)   2011

Pleasant Prairie Distribution Center

  1   (d  1,314   7,450   2,475   1,315   9,924   11,239   (4,987)   1999

Poplar Gateway Truck Terminal

  1    2,321   4,699   525   2,321   5,224   7,545   (286)   2011

Port OHare

  2   (d  4,819   5,547   44   4,819   5,591   10,410   (424)   2011

Remington Lakes Dist

  1    2,382   11,657   480   2,382   12,137   14,519   (586)   2011

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Northbrook Distribution Center

  1     2,056    8,227    1,981    2,056    10,208    12,264    (2,340)   2007

Northlake Distribution Center

  1     372    2,105    800    372    2,905    3,277    (2,005)   1996

OHare Industrial Portfolio

  6     4,126    10,096    137    4,126    10,233    14,359    (1,766)   2011

Pleasant Prairie Distribution Center

  1     1,314    7,450    2,733    1,315    10,182    11,497    (6,008)   1999

Poplar Gateway Truck Terminal

  1     2,321    4,699    519    2,321    5,218    7,539    (725)   2011

Port OHare

  2     4,819    5,547    256    4,819    5,803    10,622    (971)   2011

Remington Lakes Dist

  1     2,382    11,657    606    2,382    12,263    14,645    (1,380)   2011

Rochelle Distribution Center

  1    4,457   20,100   11,049   5,254   30,352   35,606   (2,933)   2008  1     4,457    20,100    11,131    5,254    30,434    35,688    (4,789)   2008

Romeoville Distribution Center

  5   (d  23,325   94,197   1,557   23,325   95,754   119,079   (24,395)   1995, 2005  5   (d)  23,325    94,197    10,129    23,325    104,326    127,651    (31,396)   1999, 2005

S.C. Johnson & Son

  1    2,267   15,911   1,531   3,152   16,557   19,709   (2,049)   2008  1     2,267    15,911    1,552    3,152    16,578    19,730    (3,156)   2008

Sivert Distribution

  1    1,497   1,470       1,497   1,470   2,967   (105)   2011  1     1,497    1,470    8    1,497    1,478    2,975    (236)   2011

Touhy Cargo Terminal

  1   (d  2,697   8,909       2,697   8,909   11,606   (429)   2011  1     2,697    8,909       2,697    8,909    11,606    (970)   2011

Waukegan Distribution Center

  2   (d  4,368   17,632   806   4,368   18,438   22,806   (3,817)   2007  2     4,368    17,632    1,075    4,368    18,707    23,075    (5,232)   2007

West Chicago Distribution Center

  1    3,125   12,499   2,243   3,125   14,742   17,867   (3,220)   2005  1     3,125    12,499    3,299    3,125    15,798    18,923    (4,622)   2005

Windsor Court

  1    635   3,493   180   635   3,673   4,308   (224)   2011  1     635    3,493    184    635    3,677    4,312    (555)   2011

Wood Dale Industrial SG

  5    4,343   10,174   130   4,343   10,304   14,647   (650)   2011  5     4,343    10,174    717    4,343    10,891    15,234    (1,548)   2011

Woodale Distribution Center

  1    263   1,490   460   263   1,950   2,213   (1,177)   1997  1     263    1,490    589    263    2,079    2,342    (1,313)   1997

Woodridge Distribution Center

  14   (d  46,575   197,289   18,082   49,942   212,004   261,946   (49,813)   2005, 2007  14   (d)  46,575    197,289    21,583    49,942    215,505    265,447    (65,513)   2005, 2007

Yohan Industrial

  3   (d  4,219   12,306   353   4,219   12,659   16,878   (731)   2011  3     4,219    12,306    1,157    4,219    13,463    17,682    (1,768)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Chicago, Illinois

  167    294,783   1,039,207   183,036   306,521   1,210,505   1,517,026   (270,334)     161     302,344    1,101,341    224,297    315,104    1,312,878    1,627,982    (345,376)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Cincinnati, Ohio

                    

Airpark Distribution Center

  2   (d  2,958   9,894   12,662   3,938   21,576   25,514   (6,066)   1996,2012  4   (d)  5,851    22,543    14,311    6,831    35,874    42,705    (7,717)   1996, 2012, 2014

Capital Distribution Center II

  5   (d  1,953   11,067   6,646   1,953   17,713   19,666   (10,679)   1994

Empire Distribution Center

  3   (d  529   2,995   2,626   529   5,621   6,150   (3,698)   1995

Fairfield Business Center

  1    348   1,971   683   381   2,621   3,002   (883)   2004

DAY Cargo Center

  5        4,749    531       5,280    5,280    (1,480)   2011

Fairfield Comm Ctr

  1   (d)  2,526    10,864    29    2,526    10,893    13,419    (86)   2014

Monroe Park

  1   (d)  7,222    30,988    301    7,222    31,289    38,511    (244)   2014

Mosteller Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  921    4,192    28    921    4,220    5,141    (40)   2014

Park I-275

  2   (d  7,109   26,097   2,627   7,109   28,724   35,833   (1,815)   2008, 2012  4   (d)  15,939    63,846    3,153    15,939    66,999    82,938    (4,261)   2008, 2012, 2014

Sharonville Distribution Center

  2   (d  1,202       14,502   2,424   13,280   15,704   (5,327)   1997  2   (d)  1,202       15,047    2,424    13,825    16,249    (6,391)   1997

West Chester Comm Park I

  2   (d  1,939   8,224   202   1,939   8,426   10,365   (268)   2012  5   (d)  9,466    39,950    2,356    9,466    42,306    51,772    (1,193)   2012, 2014
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Cincinnati, Ohio

  17    16,038   60,248   39,948   18,273   97,961   116,234   (28,736)     23     43,127    177,132    35,756    45,329    210,686    256,015    (21,412)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Columbus, Ohio

                    

Alum Creek Dist Ctr

  1    1,042   5,087   122   1,042   5,209   6,251   (204)   2012  1     917    4,584    277    917    4,861    5,778    (659)   2012

Brookham Distribution Center

  2    5,964   23,858   4,063   5,965   27,920   33,885   (7,674)   2005  2     5,964    23,858    4,946    5,965    28,803    34,768    (10,113)   2005

Canal Pointe Distribution Center

  1    1,237   7,013   1,469   1,280   8,439   9,719   (3,808)   1999  1     1,237    7,013    1,728    1,280    8,698    9,978    (4,572)   1999

Capital Park South Distribution Center

  7   (d  8,484   30,385   26,735   8,876   56,728   65,604   (13,970)   1996, 2012  8   (d)  10,077    40,234    29,285    10,470    69,126    79,596    (18,495)   1996, 2012, 2014

Charter Street Distribution Center

  1   (d  1,245   7,055   726   1,245   7,781   9,026   (3,499)   1999

Columbus West Ind Ctr

  1   (d)  427    2,600       427    2,600    3,027    (29)   2014

Corporate Park West

  2   (d  679   3,847   2,201   679   6,048   6,727   (3,701)   1996  2   (d)  994    6,150    1,409    994    7,559    8,553    (2,494)   1996, 2014

Crosswinds Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  3,058    19,240       3,058    19,240    22,298    (162)   2014

Etna Distribution Center

  1    1,669       19,785   1,669   19,785   21,454   (3,060)   2007  4   (d)  10,789    35,577    42,552    10,789    78,129    88,918    (5,941)   2007, 2013, 2014

Fisher Distribution Center

  1    1,197   6,785   4,361   1,197   11,146   12,343   (6,287)   1995

Foreign Trade Center I

  4   (d  4,696   26,999   7,381   5,161   33,915   39,076   (15,783)   1999

International Street Comm Ctr

  2   (d  1,503   6,356   129   1,503   6,485   7,988   (207)   2012  2     1,503    6,356    383    1,503    6,739    8,242    (735)   2012

Lockbourne Dist Ctr

  1    540   3,030   157   540   3,187   3,727   (156)   2012  1     540    3,030    352    540    3,382    3,922    (575)   2012

New World Distribution Center

  1    207   1,173   2,414   207   3,587   3,794   (2,407)   1994

South Park Distribution Center

  2   (d  3,343   15,182   3,109   3,343   18,291   21,634   (6,095)   1999, 2005  2   (d)  3,343    15,182    3,370    3,343    18,552    21,895    (7,766)   1999, 2005

Westbelt Business Center

  3    1,777   7,168   1,769   1,777   8,937   10,714   (1,745)   2006

Westpointe Distribution Center

  2   (d  1,446   7,601   868   1,446   8,469   9,915   (2,445)   2007  2     1,446    7,601    1,298    1,446    8,899    10,345    (3,474)   2007
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Columbus, Ohio

  31    35,029   151,539   75,289   35,930   225,927   261,857   (71,041)     27     40,295    171,425    85,600    40,732    256,588    297,320    (55,015)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas

                    

Addison Technology Center

  1    858   3,996       858   3,996   4,854   (239)   2011

Arlington Corp Ctr

  1    3,212   13,971   1   3,437   13,747   17,184   (68)   2012  3   (d)  6,509    28,032    125    6,509    28,157    34,666    (1,268)   2012, 2014

Centerport Distribution Center

  1    1,250   7,082   1,175   1,250   8,257   9,507   (3,810)   1999

Dallas Corporate Center

  11   (d  6,449   5,441   33,056   6,645   38,301   44,946   (15,945)   1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2012  11   (d)  6,449    5,441    34,632    6,645    39,877    46,522    (18,407)   1996, 1997, 1998,

1999, 2012

Dallas Industrial

  12    7,180   26,514   647   7,180   27,161   34,341   (1,776)   2011  12     7,180    26,514    2,682    7,180    29,196    36,376    (4,290)   2011

DFW Cargo Center 1

  1        35,117    973       36,090    36,090    (5,105)   2011

DFW Cargo Center 2

  1        27,916    200       28,116    28,116    (3,849)   2011

DFW Cargo Center East

  3        19,730    333       20,063    20,063    (4,469)   2011

Flower Mound Distribution Center

  1   (d  5,157   20,991   2,443   5,157   23,434   28,591   (4,311)   2007  1   (d)  5,157    20,991    2,470    5,157    23,461    28,618    (6,250)   2007

Freeport Corp Ctr

  2   (d  8,183   35,161   277   8,183   35,438   43,621   (1,171)   2012  5   (d)  15,415    65,273    702    15,415    65,975    81,390    (4,424)   2012, 2014

Freeport Distribution Center

  4   (d  1,393   5,549   5,330   1,440   10,832   12,272   (5,664)   1996, 1997, 1998  4     1,393    5,549    5,947    1,440    11,449    12,889    (6,427)   1996, 1997, 1998

Great Southwest Corp Ctr

  3     4,476    19,302    210    4,476    19,512    23,988    (153)   2014

Great Southwest Distribution Center

  32   (d  40,791   177,237   26,002   40,793   203,237   244,030   (59,028)   1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000,

2001, 2002, 2005, 2012

  24   (d)  38,395    160,253    25,811    38,395    186,064    224,459    (58,819)   1995, 1996, 1997,

1999, 2000, 2001,

2002, 2005, 2012,

2014

Greater Dallas Industrial Port

  3    3,525   16,375   181   3,525   16,556   20,081   (1,065)   2011  3     3,525    16,375    967    3,525    17,342    20,867    (2,481)   2011

Lancaster Distribution Center

  2   (d  5,350   14,362   24,470   5,005   39,177   44,182   (4,483)   2007, 2008  5   (d)  20,635    14,362    93,709    19,969    108,737    128,706    (9,024)   2007, 2008, 2013,

2014

Lincoln Industrial Center

  1    738   1,600   33   738   1,633   2,371   (148)   2011

Lonestar Portfolio

  3    4,736   13,035   261   4,736   13,296   18,032   (996)   2011  3     4,736    13,035    2,835    4,736    15,870    20,606    (2,374)   2011

Mesquite Dist Ctr

  1   (d  3,128   13,217   20   3,128   13,237   16,365   (427)   2012  2   (d)  8,355    35,440    104    8,355    35,544    43,899    (1,781)   2012, 2014

Northfield Dist. Center

  8    10,106   54,061   1,876   10,106   55,937   66,043   (2,858)   2011

Mesquite Dist III

  1     1,691       11,894    1,691    11,894    13,585    (564)   2013

Northgate Distribution Center

  8   (d  10,323   51,100   5,525   10,809   56,139   66,948   (13,869)   1999, 2005, 2008, 2012  10   (d)  13,001    62,680    6,772    13,488    68,965    82,453    (18,380)   1999, 2005, 2008,

2012, 2014

Pinnacle Park Distribution Center

  1   (d  1,657   6,940   43   1,657   6,983   8,640   (221)   2012

Richardson Tech Center SGP

  2    1,462   4,557   154   1,462   4,711   6,173   (307)   2011

Royal Distribution Center

  1    811   4,598   1,109   811   5,707   6,518   (2,223)   2001  1     811    4,598    2,235    811    6,833    7,644    (2,725)   2001

Stemmons Distribution Center

  1    272   1,544   836   272   2,380   2,652   (1,464)   1995  1     272    1,544    962    272    2,506    2,778    (1,667)   1995

Stemmons Industrial Center

  8    1,653   10,526   5,332   1,653   15,858   17,511   (9,753)   1994, 1995, 1996, 1999

Trinity Mills Distribution Center

  4   (d  3,181   18,090   4,267   3,181   22,357   25,538   (10,796)   1996, 1999, 2001

Valwood Business Center

  3    2,842   11,715   1,054   2,842   12,769   15,611   (3,405)   2001, 2006

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Stemmons Industrial Center

  8     1,653    10,526    6,198    1,653    16,724    18,377    (11,143)   1994, 1995, 1996,

1999

Trinity Mills Distribution Center

  1   (d)  735    3,774    1,020    735    4,794    5,529    (2,535)   1999

Valwood Business Center

  5   (d)  4,679    19,674    1,146    4,679    20,820    25,499    (4,485)   2001, 2006, 2014

Valwood Distribution Center

  1    850   4,890   885   850   5,775   6,625   (2,509)    1999   5   (d)  4,742    21,498    1,289    4,742    22,787    27,529    (3,179)   1999, 2014

Valwood Industrial

  2    1,802   9,658   186   1,802   9,844   11,646   (694)    2011   2     1,802    9,658    575    1,802    10,233    12,035    (1,620)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas

  114    126,909   532,210   115,163   127,520   646,762   774,282   (147,230)     115     151,611    627,282    203,791    151,675    831,009    982,684    (175,419)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Denver, Colorado

                    

Denver Business Center

  5   (d  3,644   16,429   197   3,662   16,608   20,270   (1,148)    2002, 2012    3   (d)  3,142    13,396    775    3,142    14,171    17,313    (1,312)   2012

Havana Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  1,421    5,958    70    1,421    6,028    7,449    (65)   2014

Pagosa Distribution Center

  1   (d  406   2,322   1,427   406   3,749   4,155   (2,476)    1993   1   (d)  398    2,322    1,675    398    3,997    4,395    (2,849)   1993

Peoria Dist Ctr

  2   (d)  4,129    17,465    14    4,129    17,479    21,608    (138)   2014

Stapleton Business Center

  12   (d  34,634   139,257   6,962   34,635   146,218   180,853   (36,247)    2005   12   (d)  34,634    139,257    9,384    34,635    148,640    183,275    (47,204)   2005

Upland Distribution Center

  3    385   4,421   4,641   398   9,049   9,447   (4,570)    1994,1995    6   (d)  4,064    19,844    5,335    4,077    25,166    29,243    (5,414)   1994, 1995, 2014

Upland Distribution Center II

  3    1,295   5,159   5,792   1,328   10,918   12,246   (7,256)    1993   2   (d)  1,396    5,603    2,136    1,409    7,726    9,135    (2,756)   1993, 2014
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Denver, Colorado

  24    40,364   167,588   19,019   40,429   186,542   226,971   (51,697)     27     49,184    203,845    19,389    49,211    223,207    272,418    (59,738)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

El Paso, Texas

                    

Billy the Kid Distribution Center

  1    273   1,547   1,660   273   3,207   3,480   (2,088)    1994 

Northwestern Corporate Center

  7   (d)    6,450   23,222   21,727   7,455   43,944   51,399   (11,085)    
 
1992, 1993, 1994,
1997, 2012
  
  

Vista Corporate Center

  1     649    6,220       649    6,220    6,869    (48)   2014

Vista Del Sol Ind Ctr III

  1    2,040   8,840       2,040   8,840   10,880   (43)    2012   1     2,040    8,840    85    2,040    8,925    10,965    (739)   2012

Vista Del Sol Industrial Center II

  3    4,235   16,385   7,860   4,665   23,815   28,480   (4,066)    1997, 1998, 2012    2     366       7,829    796    7,399    8,195    (3,931)   1997, 1998
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

El Paso, Texas

  12    12,998   49,994   31,247   14,433   79,806   94,239   (17,282)     4     3,055    15,060    7,914    3,485    22,544    26,029    (4,718)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Houston, Texas

                    

Blalock Distribution Center

  3   (d)    4,762   20,903   2,429   4,761   23,333   28,094   (2,352)    2002, 2012    3   (d)  5,032    21,983    3,178    5,031    25,162    30,193    (4,540)   2002, 2012

Crosstimbers Distribution Center

  1    359   2,035   1,191   359   3,226   3,585   (2,056)    1994   1     359    2,035    1,284    359    3,319    3,678    (2,350)   1994

IAH Cargo Center 1

  1        13,267    252       13,519    13,519    (904)   2012

Jersey Village Corp Ctr

  2   (d)    9,506   39,840   38   9,506   39,878   49,384   (1,268)    2012   4   (d)  17,971    74,804    309    17,971    75,113    93,084    (4,553)   2012, 2014

Kempwood Business Center

  4    1,746   9,894   3,023   1,746   12,917   14,663   (5,648)    2001   4     1,746    9,894    3,504    1,746    13,398    15,144    (6,763)   2001

Northpark Distribution Center

  3   (d)    3,873   16,568   2,899   3,873   19,467   23,340   (2,829)    2006, 2008    10   (d)  13,003    37,428    23,729    13,003    61,157    74,160    (5,023)   2006, 2008, 2012,

2013, 2014

Perimeter Distribution Center

  2    813   4,604   1,489   813   6,093   6,906   (3,072)    1999   2     676    4,604    1,004    676    5,608    6,284    (2,878)   1999

Pine Forest Business Center

  9    2,665   14,132   7,284   2,665   21,416   24,081   (12,878)    1993, 1995    11   (d)  6,042    28,833    8,637    6,042    37,470    43,512    (15,103)   1993, 1995, 2014

Pine North Distribution Center

  2    847   4,800   1,092   847   5,892   6,739   (2,901)    1999   2     847    4,800    1,203    847    6,003    6,850    (3,366)   1999

Pinemont Distribution Center

  2    642   3,636   862   642   4,498   5,140   (2,225)    1999   2     642    3,636    1,000    642    4,636    5,278    (2,601)   1999

Post Oak Business Center

  11    2,334   11,655   8,527   2,334   20,182   22,516   (12,178)    1993, 1994, 1996    11     2,334    11,655    9,663    2,334    21,318    23,652    (14,285)   1993, 1994, 1996

Post Oak Distribution Center

  5    1,522   8,758   5,212   1,522   13,970   15,492   (9,612)    1993, 1994    5     1,522    8,758    6,107    1,522    14,865    16,387    (10,719)   1993, 1994

South Loop Distribution Center

  2    418   1,943   1,904   418   3,847   4,265   (2,308)    1994   2     418    1,943    2,213    418    4,156    4,574    (2,699)   1994

Southland Distribution Center

  2    2,444   12,190   1,899   2,443   14,090   16,533   (2,958)    2002, 2012    2     2,505    12,437    2,000    2,505    14,437    16,942    (4,414)   2002, 2012

Sugarland Corp Ctr

  2   (d)  3,506    14,856       3,506    14,856    18,362    (115)   2014

West by Northwest Industrial Center

  6   (d)    4,543   19,310   4,393   4,739   23,507   28,246   (4,422)    1993, 1994, 2012    9   (d)  11,316    47,649    3,713    11,456    51,222    62,678    (5,342)   1993, 1994, 2012,

2014

White Street Distribution Center

  1    469   2,656   1,828   469   4,484   4,953   (2,778)    1995   1     469    2,656    2,420    469    5,076    5,545    (3,308)   1995

Wingfoot Dist Ctr

  1   (d)    1,702   7,510   33   1,702   7,543   9,245   (300)    2012   2     1,976    8,606    3,436    1,976    12,042    14,018    (1,226)   2012, 2013

World Houston Dist Ctr

  1    1,529   6,326       1,529   6,326   7,855   (28)    2012   1     1,529    6,326    42    1,529    6,368    7,897    (486)   2012
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Houston, Texas

  57    40,174   186,760   44,103   40,368   230,669   271,037   (69,813)     75     71,893    316,170    73,694    72,032    389,725    461,757    (90,675)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Indianapolis, Indiana

                    

Airport Bus Ctr

  2   (d)  1,667    7,244    6    1,667    7,250    8,917    (58)   2014

Airtech Park

  1   (d)  7,305    31,388    1    7,305    31,389    38,694    (250)   2014

Eastside Distribution Center

  1    228   1,187   1,803   299   2,919   3,218   (1,477)    1995   1     228    1,187    2,068    299    3,184    3,483    (1,807)   1995

North by Northeast Corporate Center

  1    1,058       8,236   1,059   8,235   9,294   (3,974)    1995   1     1,058       9,157    1,059    9,156    10,215    (4,848)   1995

North Plainfield Park Dist Ctr

  1   (d)  8,562    36,687       8,562    36,687    45,249    (289)   2014

Park 100 Industrial Center

  17   (d)    11,982   49,334   15,649   11,982   64,983   76,965   (15,524)    1995, 2012    17   (d)  10,410    43,048    21,491    10,410    64,539    74,949    (21,704)   1995, 2012

Park 267

  1     3,705    15,695       3,705    15,695    19,400    (122)   2014

Shadeland Industrial Center

  3    428   2,431   2,526   429   4,956   5,385   (3,343)    1995   3     428    2,431    3,150    429    5,580    6,009    (3,782)   1995
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Indianapolis, Indiana

  22    13,696   52,952   28,214   13,769   81,093   94,862   (24,318)     27     33,363    137,680    35,873    33,436    173,480    206,916    (32,860)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Jacksonville, Florida

          

JAX Cargo Center

  1        2,892    176       3,068    3,068    (894)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

  

Jacksonville, Florida

  1        2,892    176       3,068    3,068    (894)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

Kansas City, Kansas

          

MCI Cargo Center 1

  1        2,781    11       2,792    2,792    (1,297)   2011

MCI Cargo Center 2

  1        11,630          11,630    11,630    (2,557)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

  

Kansas City, Kansas

  2        14,411    11       14,422    14,422    (3,854)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

Las Vegas, Nevada

                    

Black Mountain Distribution Center

  2    1,108       7,583   1,206   7,485   8,691   (3,547  1997   2     1,108       8,022    1,206    7,924    9,130    (3,972)   1997

Cameron Business Center

  1    1,634   9,255   890   1,634   10,145   11,779   (4,529  1999   1     1,634    9,255    1,580    1,634    10,835    12,469    (5,332)   1999

Las Vegas Corporate Center

  3   (d)  7,800    32,899       7,800    32,899    40,699    (251)   2014

Sunrise Ind Park

  1    1,400   5,600   120   1,401   5,719   7,120   (197  2011   9     21,369    92,503    2,578    21,369    95,081    116,450    (5,132)   2011, 2013, 2014

West One Business Center

  4    2,468   13,985   4,065   2,468   18,050   20,518   (9,729  1996   4     2,468    13,985    5,261    2,468    19,246    21,714    (11,475)   1996
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Las Vegas, Nevada

  8    6,610   28,840   12,658   6,709   41,399   48,108   (18,002)     19     34,379    148,642    17,441    34,477    165,985    200,462    (26,162)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Louisville, Kentucky

          

Cedar Grove Distribution Center

  3    9,475   45,421   2,370   9,474   47,792   57,266   (6,603)    2005, 2008, 2012  

Commerce Crossings Distribution Center

  1    1,912   7,649   113   1,912   7,762   9,674   (1,908)    2005 

I-65 Meyer Dist. Center

  2   (d)    7,770   15,282   23,940   8,077   38,915   46,992   (4,534)    2006, 2012  

New Cut Road Dist Ctr

  1   (d)    2,711   11,694   235   2,711   11,929   14,640   (395)    2012 

Riverport Distribution Center

  1    1,515   8,585   2,596   1,515   11,181   12,696   (5,389)    1999 
 

 

   

 

 

  

Louisville, Kentucky

  8    23,383   88,631   29,254   23,689   117,579   141,268   (18,829)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Louisville, Kentucky

          

Cedar Grove Distribution Center

  3     9,611    45,964    3,582    9,610    49,547    59,157    (10,348)   2005, 2008, 2012

Commerce Crossings Distribution Center

  1     1,912    7,649    186    1,912    7,835    9,747    (2,454)   2005

I-65 Meyer Dist. Center

  2    (d  7,770    15,282    24,535    8,077    39,510    47,587    (7,640)   2006, 2012

New Cut Road Dist Ctr

  1     2,711    11,694    621    2,711    12,315    15,026    (1,378)   2012

Riverport Distribution Center

  1     1,515    8,585    2,824    1,515    11,409    12,924    (6,894)   1999
 

 

   

 

 

  

Louisville, Kentucky

  8��    23,519    89,174    31,748    23,825    120,616    144,441    (28,714)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

Memphis, Tennessee

                    

Delp Distribution Center

  3    1,068   10,546   (785)    1,068   9,761   10,829   (6,376)   1995  3     1,068    10,546    583    1,068    11,129    12,197    (7,304)   1995

DeSoto Distribution Center

  1    4,761       26,809   4,761   26,809   31,570   (3,706)   2007  2    (d  5,769    4,359    27,079    5,769    31,438    37,207    (5,904)   2007, 2014

Memphis Distribution Center

  4  (d)  9,506   42,731   1,177   9,507   43,907   53,414   (2,665)   2002, 2012  4     9,506    42,731    1,365    9,390    44,212    53,602    (6,307)   2002, 2012

Memphis Ind Park

  2    3,279   14,554   67   3,279   14,621   17,900   (510)   2012  2     3,252    14,448    190    3,252    14,638    17,890    (1,694)   2012

Olive Branch Distribution Center

  1    6,584   30,592   72   6,584   30,664   37,248   (1,144)   2012  1    (d  6,719    31,134    328    6,719    31,462    38,181    (3,856)   2012

Raines Distribution Center

  1    1,635   4,262   9,987   1,635   14,249   15,884   (8,609)   1998

Stateline Park

  1     3,943    17,714    19    3,943    17,733    21,676    (150)   2014

Willow Lake Distribution Center

  1    613   3,474   (59)    613   3,415   4,028   (1,838)   1999  1     613    3,474    (25)    613    3,449    4,062    (2,068)   1999
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Memphis, Tennessee

  13    27,446   106,159   37,268   27,447   143,426   170,873   (24,848)     14     30,870    124,406    29,539    30,754    154,061    184,815    (27,283)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Nashville, Tennessee

                    

Bakertown Distribution Center

  2    463   2,626   962   463   3,588   4,051   (2,128)   1995

CentrePointe Distribution Center

  2    (d  3,760    15,042    72    3,760    15,114    18,874    (525)   2013

Elam Farms Park

  1     2,097    8,386    1,834    2,097    10,220    12,317    (585)   2013

I-40 Industrial Center

  5  (d)  3,122   16,075   3,167   3,123   19,241   22,364   (6,529)   1995, 1996,

1999, 2012

  4     3,075    15,333    3,713    3,075    19,046    22,121    (7,202)   1995, 1996, 1999,

2012

Interchange City Distribution Center

  3  (d)  2,844   13,939   4,467   3,358   17,892   21,250   (2,936)   1998, 2012  11    (d  11,460    51,905    1,640    11,460    53,545    65,005    (2,203)   1999, 2012, 2014

Space Park South Distribution Center

  15    3,499   19,830   12,789   3,499   32,619   36,118   (20,463)   1994

Southpark Distribution Center

  4    (d  11,834    47,336    626    11,834    47,962    59,796    (1,654)   2013
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Nashville, Tennessee

  25    9,928   52,470   21,385   10,443   73,340   83,783   (32,056)     22     32,226    138,002    7,885    32,226    145,887    178,113    (12,169)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

New Jersey/New York City

          

Bellmawr Distribution Center

  1    211   1,197   421   211   1,618   1,829   (914)   1999

New Jersey/New York

          

Brunswick Distribution Center

  2    870   4,928   2,550   870   7,478   8,348   (4,500)   1997  2     870    4,928    2,855    870    7,783    8,653    (5,055)   1997

CenterPoint Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  4,258   11,070   67   4,258   11,137   15,395   (448)   2012  1     2,839    12,490    1,753    2,839    14,243    17,082    (1,684)   2012

Chester Distribution Center

  1    548   5,319   300   548   5,619   6,167   (3,779)   2002  1     548    5,319    300    548    5,619    6,167    (4,169)   2002

Clifton Dist Ctr

  1    8,064   12,096   330   8,064   12,426   20,490   (1,058)   2010  1     8,064    12,096    1,322    8,064    13,418    21,482    (2,031)   2010

Cranbury Bus Park

  5  (d)  19,866   50,872   356   15,068   56,026   71,094   (636)   2012  8    (d  43,056    93,306    2,013    43,056    95,319    138,375    (5,391)   2012, 2014

Dellamor

  7  (d)  6,710   35,478   498   6,710   35,976   42,686   (2,562)   2011  7     6,710    35,478    2,029    6,710    37,507    44,217    (5,876)   2011

Docks Corner SG (Phase II)

  1    16,232   19,264   1,138   16,232   20,402   36,634   (2,303)   2011  1     16,232    19,264    5,677    16,232    24,941    41,173    (5,680)   2011

Exit 10 Distribution Center

  7  (d)  24,152   130,270   3,982   24,152   134,252   158,404   (32,229)   2005, 2010  7    (d  24,152    130,270    7,881    24,152    138,151    162,303    (42,058)   2005, 2010

Exit 8A Distribution Center

  1    7,626   44,103   522   7,787   44,464   52,251   (10,830)   2005  2    (d  21,164    87,001    563    21,164    87,564    108,728    (14,166)   2005, 2014

Fairfalls Portfolio

  28  (d)  20,388   64,619   1,457   20,388   66,076   86,464   (4,809)   2011

Franklin Comm Ctr

  1    9,304   23,768   59   9,304   23,827   33,131   (1,166)   2011  1     9,304    23,768    81    9,304    23,849    33,153    (2,641)   2011

Highway 17 55 Madis

  1    2,937   13,477   16   2,937   13,493   16,430   (930)   2011  1     2,937    13,477    1,057    2,937    14,534    17,471    (2,114)   2011

JFK Cargo Center 75_77

  2        35,916    3,031       38,947    38,947    (15,166)   2011

Kilmer Distribution Center

  4  (d)  2,526   14,313   3,383   2,526   17,696   20,222   (10,297)   1996  4    (d  2,526    14,313    4,206    2,526    18,519    21,045    (11,514)   1996

Liberty Log Ctr

  1    3,273   24,029   15   3,273   24,044   27,317   (1,071)   2011  1     3,273    24,029    82    3,273    24,111    27,384    (2,429)   2011

Linden Industrial

  1    1,321   7,523   328   1,321   7,851   9,172   (451)   2011  1     1,321    7,523    517    1,321    8,040    9,361    (1,077)   2011

Mahwah Corporate Center

  4    12,695   27,342   8   12,695   27,350   40,045   (1,678)   2011  4     12,695    27,342    894    12,695    28,236    40,931    (3,813)   2011

Meadow Lane

  1    1,036   6,388       1,036   6,388   7,424   (432)   2011  1     1,036    6,388    2    1,036    6,390    7,426    (977)   2011

Meadowland Distribution Center

  4  (d)  10,271   57,480   3,328   10,271   60,808   71,079   (14,909)   2005  4    (d  10,271    57,480    4,923    10,271    62,403    72,674    (19,387)   2005

Meadowland Industrial Center

  7  (d)  4,190   13,469   16,840   4,190   30,309   34,499   (17,718)   1996, 1998  7    (d  4,190    13,469    17,338    4,190    30,807    34,997    (19,933)   1996, 1998

Meadowlands ALFII

  3  (d)  3,972   18,895   464   3,972   19,359   23,331   (1,124)   2011  3     3,972    18,895    3,042    3,972    21,937    25,909    (2,768)   2011

Meadowlands Cross Dock

  1    1,607   5,049   632   1,607   5,681   7,288   (344)   2011

Meadowlands Park

  8    6,898   41,471   729   6,898   42,200   49,098   (2,815)   2011  8     6,898    41,471    1,790    6,898    43,261    50,159    (6,510)   2011

Mooncreek Distribution Center

  1    3,319   13,422   12   3,319   13,434   16,753   (984)   2011  1     3,319    13,422    15    3,319    13,437    16,756    (2,227)   2011

Mt. Laurel Distribution Center

  1    229   951   781   230   1,731   1,961   (713)   1999

Murray Hill Parkway

  2    2,907   12,040   56   2,907   12,096   15,003   (740)   2011  2     2,907    12,040    225    2,907    12,265    15,172    (1,686)   2011

National Dist Ctr

  2    (d  2,417    4,244    128    2,417    4,372    6,789    (58)   2014

Newark Airport I and II

  2    2,757   8,749       2,757   8,749   11,506   (509)   2011  2     2,757    8,749    368    2,757    9,117    11,874    (1,154)   2011

Orchard Hill

  1    678   3,756       678   3,756   4,434   (272)   2011  1     678    3,756    20    678    3,776    4,454    (616)   2011

Pennsauken Distribution Center

  2    192   959   509   203   1,457   1,660   (700)   1999  2     192    959    509    203    1,457    1,660    (827)   1999

Porete Avenue Warehouse

  1    5,386   21,869   266   5,386   22,135   27,521   (1,129)   2011  1     5,386    21,869    435    5,386    22,304    27,690    (2,645)   2011

Port Reading Business Park

  1  (d)  3,370       24,519   3,370   24,519   27,889   (5,756)   2005  2    (d  28,374    39,914    24,819    28,374    64,733    93,107    (8,306)   2005, 2014

Ports Jersey City Distribution Center

  1     34,133       60,354    34,133    60,354    94,487    (663)   2014

Portview Commerce Center

  3  (d)  9,577   21,581   19,369   9,577   40,950   50,527   (1,217)   2011, 2012  3    (d  9,577    21,581    17,790    9,797    39,151    48,948    (3,267)   2011, 2012

Rancocas Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  6,154   15,239   4   6,154   15,243   21,397   (500)   2012  1     4,103    17,291    235    4,103    17,526    21,629    (1,832)   2012

Secaucus Dist Ctr

  2    (d  9,603       26,882    9,603    26,882    36,485    (1,384)   2012

Skyland Crossdock

  1        9,831   956       10,787   10,787   (687)   2011  1        9,831    1,293       11,124    11,124    (1,825)   2011

South Jersey Distribution Center

  1     6,912    17,437    181    6,912    17,618    24,530    (922)   2013

Teterboro Meadowlands 15

  1  (d)  5,837   23,214       5,837   23,214   29,051   (1,363)   2011  1     5,837    23,214       5,837    23,214    29,051    (3,067)   2011

Two South Middlesex

  1    4,389   8,410       4,389   8,410   12,799   (647)   2011  1     4,389    8,410    441    4,389    8,851    13,240    (1,494)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

New Jersey/New York City

  109    213,750   772,441   83,895   209,125   860,961   1,070,086   (132,220)   

New Jersey/New York

  91     302,642    886,940    195,051    302,873    1,081,760    1,384,633    (206,412)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

On Tarmac

          

BWI Cargo Center E

  1        10,725   108       10,833   10,833   (2,019)   2011

DAY Cargo Center

  5        4,749   212       4,961   4,961   (623)   2011

DFW Cargo Center 1

�� 1        35,117   475       35,592   35,592   (2,198)   2011

DFW Cargo Center 2

  1        27,916   123       28,039   28,039   (1,684)   2011

DFW Cargo Center East

  3        19,730   36       19,766   19,766   (1,959)   2011

IAD Cargo Center 5

  1        43,060   50       43,110   43,110   (11,156)   2011

IAH Cargo Center 1

  1        13,267           13,267   13,267      2012

JAX Cargo Center

  1        2,892           2,892   2,892   (394)   2011

JFK Cargo Center 75_77

  2        35,916   1,571       37,487   37,487   (10,724)   2011

LAX Cargo Center

  3        19,217   13       19,230   19,230   (2,114)   2011

Norfolk, Virginia

          

Chesapeake Dist Ctr

  1     2,335    9,665       2,335    9,665    12,000    (72)   2014
 

 

   

 

 

  

Norfolk, Virginia

  1     2,335    9,665       2,335    9,665    12,000    (72)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

MCI Cargo Center 1

  1        2,781   11       2,792   2,792   (573)   2011

MCI Cargo Center 2

  1  (d)      11,630           11,630   11,630   (1,130)   2011

PDX Cargo Center Airtrans

  2        13,697   16       13,713   13,713   (1,198)   2011

PHL Cargo Center C2

  1        11,966   25       11,991   11,991   (1,911)   2011

RNO Cargo Center 10_11

  2        4,265           4,265   4,265   (448)   2011

SEA Cargo Center North

  2  (d)      14,170   27       14,197   14,197   (3,453)   2011

SEA Cargo Center South

  1        2,745   10       2,755   2,755   (1,259)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

  

On Tarmac

  29        273,843   2,677       276,520   276,520   (42,843)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

Orlando, Florida

                    

Beltway Commerce Center

  3    17,082   25,526   4,235   17,082   29,761   46,843   (2,506)   2008  3     17,082    25,526    8,595    17,082    34,121    51,203    (4,497)   2008

Chancellor Distribution Center

  1    380   2,157   2,161   380   4,318   4,698   (2,495)   1994  1     380    2,157    2,566    380    4,723    5,103    (2,933)   1994

Chancellor Square

  3    2,087   9,708   145   2,087   9,853   11,940   (573)   2011  3     2,087    9,708    2,150    2,087    11,858    13,945    (1,615)   2011

Consulate Distribution Center

  3    4,148   23,617   1,754   4,148   25,371   29,519   (11,900)   1999  5    (d  6,105    31,961    2,111    6,105    34,072    40,177    (13,678)   1999, 2014

Davenport Dist Ctr

  1    934   3,991   60   934   4,051   4,985   (131)   2012  1     934    3,991    96    934    4,087    5,021    (439)   2012

Jacksonville Dist Ctr

  1    3,453   14,707   33   3,453   14,740   18,193   (683)   2012

LaQuinta Distribution Center

  1    354   2,006   2,034   354   4,040   4,394   (2,754)   1994

Orlando Central Park

  1    1,398   5,977   11   1,398   5,988   7,386   (230)   2012  1     1,398    5,977    400    1,398    6,377    7,775    (765)   2012

Orlando Corp Ctr

  6    (d  8,061    34,860    251    8,061    35,111    43,172    (279)   2014

Presidents Drive

  6    6,845   31,180   492   6,845   31,672   38,517   (2,134)   2011  6     6,845    31,180    3,937    6,845    35,117    41,962    (5,198)   2011

Sand Lake Service Center

  6    3,704   19,546   1,256   3,704   20,802   24,506   (1,271)   2011  6     3,704    19,546    3,169    3,704    22,715    26,419    (3,410)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Orlando, Florida

  26    40,385   138,415   12,181   40,385   150,596   190,981   (24,677)     32     46,596    164,906    23,275    46,596    188,181    234,777    (32,814)   
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Phoenix, Arizona

                    

24th Street Industrial Center

  2    503   2,852   1,759   561   4,553   5,114   (3,133)   1994  2     503    2,852    1,909    561    4,703    5,264    (3,458 1994

Alameda Distribution Center

  2    3,872   14,358   2,309   3,872   16,667   20,539   (4,258)   2005  2     3,872    14,358    2,474    3,872    16,832    20,704    (5,566 2005

Brookridge Dist Ctr

  1    (d  3,897    16,852    7    3,897    16,859    20,756    (135 2014

Hohokam 10 Business Center

  1    1,317   7,468   1,269   1,318   8,736   10,054   (3,823)   1999  1     1,317    7,468    1,306    1,318    8,773    10,091    (4,587 1999

Kyrene Commons Distribution Center

  3    1,093   5,475   2,284   1,093   7,759   8,852   (4,297)   1992, 1998, 1999  3     1,093    5,475    2,500    1,093    7,975    9,068    (4,895 1992, 1998, 1999

Papago Distribution Center

  3    4,828   20,017   4,334   4,829   24,350   29,179   (7,336)   1994, 2005  3     4,828    20,017    4,919    4,829    24,935    29,764    (9,573 1994, 2005

Phoenix Distribution Center

  1    1,441   5,578   107   1,441   5,685   7,126   (103)   2012  1     1,441    5,578    216    1,441    5,794   ��7,235    (501 2012

Riverside Dist Ctr (PHX)

  1    1,783   7,130   116   1,783   7,246   9,029   (328)   2011

Roosevelt Distribution Center

  1    1,766   7,065   116   1,766   7,181   8,947   (1,768)   2005

University Dr Distribution Center

  1    683   2,735   225   683   2,960   3,643   (761)   2005  1     683    2,735    454    683    3,189    3,872    (1,009 2005

Watkins Street Distribution Center

  1    242   1,375   477   243   1,851   2,094   (1,189)   1995  1     242    1,375    596    243    1,970    2,213    (1,340 1995

Wilson Drive Distribution Center

  1    1,273   5,093   884   1,273   5,977   7,250   (1,411)   2005  1     1,273    5,093    926    1,273    6,019    7,292    (1,951 2005
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Phoenix, Arizona

  17    18,801   79,146   13,880   18,862   92,965   111,827   (28,407)     16     19,149    81,803    15,307    19,210    97,049    116,259    (33,015 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Portland, Oregon

                    

Clackamas Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  1,648   6,850   19   1,648   6,869   8,517   (215)   2012  5    (d  8,828    29,081    80    8,828    29,161    37,989    (841 2012, 2014

PDX Cargo Center Airtrans

  2         13,697    211        13,908    13,908    (2,725 2011

PDX Corporate Center East

  4    (d  7,126    22,413    47    7,126    22,460    29,586    (171 2014

PDX Corporate Center North Phase II

  1  (d)(e)  5,051   9,895   1,687   5,051   11,582   16,633   (1,345)   2008  4    (d)(e)   10,293    26,183    1,835    10,293    28,018    38,311    (2,290 2008, 2014

Southshore Corporate Center

  1  (d)(e)  3,521   13,915   (294)    3,578   13,564   17,142   (2,900)   2006  2    (d)(e)   7,059    24,799    (251  7,117    24,490    31,607    (3,934 2006, 2014

Wilsonville Corporate Center

  3  (d)  1,570       7,808   1,588   7,790   9,378   (4,371)   1995
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Portland, Oregon

  6    11,790   30,660   9,220   11,865   39,805   51,670   (8,831)     17     33,306    116,173    1,922    33,364    118,037    151,401    (9,961 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Reno, Nevada

                    

Damonte Ranch Dist Ctr

  2  (d)  7,056   29,742   132   7,056   29,874   36,930   (957)   2012  3    (d  8,764    37,135    877    8,764    38,012    46,776    (3,290 2012, 2014

Golden Valley Distribution Center

  1    940   13,686   2,125   2,415   14,336   16,751   (3,521)   2005  1     940    13,686    2,223    2,415    14,434    16,849    (4,570 2005

Meredith Kleppe Business Center

  1    526   753   3,594   526   4,347   4,873   (2,771)   1993  5    (d  2,988    11,271    3,674    2,988    14,945    17,933    (3,274 1993, 2014

Packer Way Distribution Center

  2    506   2,879   1,656   506   4,535   5,041   (3,163)   1993  2     506    2,879    1,921    506    4,800    5,306    (3,480 1993

RNO Cargo Center 10_11

  2         4,265    306        4,571    4,571    (1,103 2011

Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center

  1    3,281       23,732   3,281   23,732   27,013   (3,267)   2007  1     3,281        23,844    3,281    23,844    27,125    (4,971 2007

Vista Industrial Park

  6  (d)  5,923   26,807   8,960   5,923   35,767   41,690   (14,786)   1994, 2001  6    (d  5,923    26,807    10,192    5,923    36,999    42,922    (17,670 1994, 2001
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Reno, Nevada

  13    18,232   73,867   40,199   19,707   112,591   132,298   (28,465)     20     22,402    96,043    43,037    23,877    137,605    161,482    (38,358 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Salt Lake City, Utah

                    

Clearfield Ind Ctr

  1     3,485    15,581        3,485    15,581    19,066    (184 2014

Crossroads Corp Ctr

  1    1,549   6,549   63   1,549   6,612   8,161   (214)   2012  2    (d  4,007    16,855    106    4,005    16,963    20,968    (794 2012, 2014
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Salt Lake City, Utah

  1    1,549   6,549   63   1,549   6,612   8,161   (214)     3     7,492    32,436    106    7,490    32,544    40,034    (978 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

San Antonio, Texas

                    

Coliseum Distribution Center

  2    (d  1,607    6,968        1,607    6,968    8,575    (56 2014

Director Drive Dist Ctr

  2    1,111   4,814   81   1,111   4,895   6,006   (191)   2012  2     1,271    5,455    220    1,271    5,675    6,946    (729 2012

Downtown Dist Ctr

  1     579    2,539        579    2,539    3,118    (21 2014

Eisenhauer Distribution Center

  3    3,693   15,848   153   3,693   16,001   19,694   (528)   2012  5    (d  5,042    21,684    388    5,042    22,072    27,114    (1,840 2012, 2014

Interchange East Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  1,471   6,433   208   1,471   6,641   8,112   (323)   2012  1     1,496    6,535    234    1,496    6,769    8,265    (1,098 2012

Landmark One Dist Ctr

  1    (d  857    3,699        857    3,699    4,556    (29 2014

Macro Distribution Center

  3    1,705   9,024   2,927   1,705   11,951   13,656   (3,551)   2002  4    (d  2,535    12,647    3,900    2,535    16,547    19,082    (4,757 2002, 2014

Perrin Creek Corporate Center

  2  (d)  5,454   22,689   14   5,454   22,703   28,157   (713)   2012  10    (d  9,770    41,337    177    9,770    41,514    51,284    (2,503 2012, 2014

Rittiman East Industrial Park

  2    4,848   19,223   1,428   4,849   20,650   25,499   (4,368)   2006  2     4,848    19,223    2,804    4,848    22,027    26,875    (6,192 2006

Rittiman West Industrial Park

  2    1,230   4,950   899   1,230   5,849   7,079   (1,358)   2006  2     1,230    4,950    1,159    1,230    6,109    7,339    (1,949 2006

San Antonio Distribution Center I

  6    1,203   4,648   6,863   1,203   11,511   12,714   (7,824)   1993  6     1,203    4,648    7,363    1,203    12,011    13,214    (8,928 1993

San Antonio Distribution Center II

  3    885       6,955   885   6,955   7,840   (3,852)   1994  3     885        7,588    885    7,588    8,473    (4,297 1994

San Antonio Distribution Center III

  2    1,405   7,519   126   1,409   7,641   9,050   (2,277)   1996  6    (d  5,079    23,372    956    5,083    24,324    29,407    (2,976 1996, 2012, 2014

Tri-County Distribution Center

  4    (d  6,888    28,693    651    6,889    29,343    36,232    (3,467 2007, 2014

Valley Industrial Center

  1     363        4,872    363    4,872    5,235    (2,504 1997
 

 

   

 

 

  

San Antonio, Texas

  50     43,653    181,750    30,312    43,658    212,057    255,715    (41,346 
 

 

   

 

 

  

San Francisco Bay Area, California

          

Acer Distribution Center

  1    (d  3,368    15,139    209    3,368    15,348    18,716    (2,423 2011

Alvarado Business Center

  10    (d  20,739    62,595    6,332    20,739    68,927    89,666    (22,002 2005

Bayshore Distribution Center

  1     6,450    15,049    2,696    6,450    17,745    24,195    (2,595 2011

Bayside Corporate Center

  7     4,365        20,611    4,365    20,611    24,976    (13,119 1995, 1996

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Tri-County Distribution Center

  2  (d)  3,183   12,743   563   3,184   13,305   16,489   (2,357)   2007

Valley Industrial Center

  1    363       4,826   363   4,826   5,189   (2,323)   1997
 

 

   

 

 

  

San Antonio, Texas

  29    26,551   107,891   25,043   26,557   132,928   159,485   (29,665)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

San Francisco Bay Area, California

          

Acer Distribution Center

  1  (d)  3,368   15,139   161   3,368   15,300   18,668   (1,058)   2011

Albrae Business Center

  1  (d)  2,771   7,536   20   2,771   7,556   10,327   (546)   2011

Alvarado Business Center

  10  (d)  20,739   62,595   4,752   20,739   67,347   88,086   (16,677)   2005

Arques Business Pk

  2    4,895   12,848   1,481   4,895   14,329   19,224   (824)   2011

Bayshore Distribution Center

  1    6,450   15,049   560   6,450   15,609   22,059   (1,068)   2011

Bayside Corporate Center

  7    4,365       20,458   4,365   20,458   24,823   (11,702)   1995, 1996

Bayside Plaza I

  12    5,212   18,008   6,738   5,216   24,742   29,958   (15,323)   1993  12     5,212    18,008    8,311    5,216    26,315    31,531    (17,701 1993

Bayside Plaza II

  2    634       3,427   634   3,427   4,061   (2,227)   1994  2     634        3,576    634    3,576    4,210    (2,427 1994

Brennan Distribution

  1  (d)  1,912   7,553   7   1,912   7,560   9,472   (530)   2011  1     1,912    7,553    63    1,912    7,616    9,528    (1,181 2011

Component Drive Ind Port

  3    2,829   13,532   392   2,829   13,924   16,753   (934)   2011  3     2,829    13,532    677    2,829    14,209    17,038    (2,183 2011

Cypress

  1    1,065   5,103   30   1,065   5,133   6,198   (344)   2011  1     1,065    5,103    246    1,065    5,349    6,414    (794 2011

Dado Distribution

  1    2,194   11,079   224   2,194   11,303   13,497   (805)   2011  1     2,194    11,079    267    2,194    11,346    13,540    (1,863 2011

Doolittle Distribution Center

  1    2,843   18,849   600   2,843   19,449   22,292   (1,099)   2011  1     2,843    18,849    848    2,843    19,697    22,540    (2,640 2011

Dowe Industrial Center

  2  (d)  5,884   20,400   155   5,884   20,555   26,439   (1,438)   2011  2    (d  5,884    20,400    809    5,884    21,209    27,093    (3,357 2011

Dublin Ind Portfolio

  1    3,241   15,951   993   3,241   16,944   20,185   (962)   2011  1     3,241    15,951    993    3,241    16,944    20,185    (2,179 2011

East Bay Doolittle

  1    4,015   15,988   148   4,015   16,136   20,151   (1,179)   2011  1     4,015    15,988    1,296    4,015    17,284    21,299    (2,866 2011

East Grand Airfreight

  2    3,977   11,730   85   3,977   11,815   15,792   (659)   2011  2     3,977    11,730    464    3,977    12,194    16,171    (1,523 2011

Edgewater Industrial Center

  1    6,630   31,153   128   6,630   31,281   37,911   (2,207)   2011  1     6,630    31,153    1,968    6,630    33,121    39,751    (5,206 2011

Eigenbrodt Way Distribution Center

  1    393   2,228   603   393   2,831   3,224   (1,823)   1993  1     393    2,228    694    393    2,922    3,315    (2,038 1993

Gateway Corporate Center

  10    6,736   24,747   7,999   6,744   32,738   39,482   (20,781)   1993  10     6,736    24,747    10,340    6,744    35,079    41,823    (23,670 1993

Hayward Commerce Center

  4    1,933   10,955   3,144   1,933   14,099   16,032   (8,932)   1993  4     1,933    10,955    3,550    1,933    14,505    16,438    (10,191 1993

Hayward Commerce Park

  2    (d  7,131    11,144    325    7,131    11,469    18,600    (121 2014

Hayward Distribution Center

  3    1,234   7,930   4,465   1,541   12,088   13,629   (8,286)   1993  2     831    5,510    3,213    1,038    8,516    9,554    (6,423 1993

Hayward Ind - Hathaway

  2    6,177   8,271       6,177   8,271   14,448   (1,431)   2011  2     6,177    8,271    25    6,177    8,296    14,473    (3,244 2011

Hayward Industrial Center

  13    4,481   25,393   8,243   4,481   33,636   38,117   (21,125)   1993  13     4,481    25,393    9,298    4,481    34,691    39,172    (24,063 1993

Junction Industrial Park

  4    7,658   39,106   1,044   7,658   40,150   47,808   (2,238)   2011  4     7,658    39,106    1,369    7,658    40,475    48,133    (5,202 2011

Lakeside BC

  2    7,280   21,116   250   7,280   21,366   28,646   (1,032)   2011  1     3,969    11,181    871    3,969    12,052    16,021    (1,281 2011

Laurelwood Drive

  2    3,941   13,161   103   3,941   13,264   17,205   (740)   2011  2     3,941    13,161    318    3,941    13,479    17,420    (1,708 2011

Lawrence SSF

  1    2,189   7,498   91   2,189   7,589   9,778   (491)   2011  1     2,189    7,498    149    2,189    7,647    9,836    (1,128 2011

Livermore Distribution Center

  4    8,992   26,976   2,075   8,992   29,051   38,043   (7,522)   2005  4     8,992    26,976    2,377    8,992    29,353    38,345    (9,724 2005

Manzanita R and D

  1    1,420   3,454       1,420   3,454   4,874   (190)   2011

Martin-Scott Ind Port

  2    3,546   9,717   107   3,546   9,824   13,370   (675)   2011  2 ��   3,546    9,717    328    3,546    10,045    13,591    (1,554 2011

Moffett Distribution

  7  (d)  16,889   30,590   174   16,889   30,764   47,653   (1,854)   2011

Moffett Park - Bordeaux R and D

  4    6,663   19,552   206   6,663   19,758   26,421   (1,280)   2011

Oakland Industrial Center

  3  (d)  8,234   24,704   2,117   8,235   26,820   35,055   (6,585)   2005  3    (d  8,234    24,704    2,487    8,235    27,190    35,425    (8,482 2005

Overlook Distribution Center

  1    1,573   8,915   389   1,573   9,304   10,877   (4,152)   1999  1     1,573    8,915    2,585    1,573    11,500    13,073    (4,897 1999

Pacific Business Center

  2    6,075   26,260   2,633   6,075   28,893   34,968   (1,541)   2011  2     6,075    26,260    3,909    6,075    30,169    36,244    (4,122 2011

Pacific Commons Industrial Center

  6  (d)(e)  27,568   82,855   2,105   27,591   84,937   112,528   (20,954)   2005  5    (d)(e)   25,784    77,594    2,190    25,805    79,763    105,568    (25,247 2005

Pacific Industrial Center

  6  (d)  21,675   65,083   3,133   21,675   68,216   89,891   (16,868)   2005  6    (d  21,675    65,083    4,067    21,675    69,150    90,825    (21,895 2005

San Leandro Distribution Center

  3    1,387   7,862   2,363   1,387   10,225   11,612   (6,670)   1993  3     1,387    7,862    2,860    1,387    10,722    12,109    (7,618 1993

Shoreline Business Center

  8    4,328   16,101   4,451   4,328   20,552   24,880   (12,213)   1993  8     4,328    16,101    6,520    4,328    22,621    26,949    (14,204 1993

Silicon Valley R and D

  4    6,059   21,762   930   6,059   22,692   28,751   (1,393)   2011  2     2,567    10,313    340    2,567    10,653    13,220    (1,415 2011

South Bay Brokaw

  3    4,014   23,296   512   4,014   23,808   27,822   (1,377)   2011  3     4,014    23,296    822    4,014    24,118    28,132    (3,174 2011

South Bay Junction

  2    3,662   21,120   134   3,662   21,254   24,916   (1,252)   2011  2     3,662    21,120    1,402    3,662    22,522    26,184    (2,859 2011

South Bay Lundy

  2    6,500   33,642   1,245   6,500   34,887   41,387   (2,002)   2011  2     6,500    33,642    2,496    6,500    36,138    42,638    (4,802 2011

Spinnaker Business Center

  12    7,043   25,220   9,765   7,043   34,985   42,028   (20,712)   1993  12     7,043    25,220    11,321    7,043    36,541    43,584    (23,885 1993

Thornton Business Center

  4    2,047   11,706   3,657   2,066   15,344   17,410   (8,898)   1993  4     2,047    11,706    4,285    2,066    15,972    18,038    (10,372 1993

TriPoint Bus Park

  4    9,057   23,727   2,484   9,057   26,211   35,268   (1,351)   2011  4     9,057    23,727    4,071    9,057    27,798    36,855    (3,275 2011

Utah Airfreight

  1  (d)  10,657   42,842   108   10,657   42,950   53,607   (2,478)   2011  1     10,657    42,842    932    10,657    43,774    54,431    (5,746 2011

Wiegman Road

  1    2,285   12,531   55   2,285   12,586   14,871   (615)   2011  1     2,285    12,531    401    2,285    12,932    15,217    (1,439 2011

Willow Park Ind - Ph 1

  7    6,628   18,118   336   6,628   18,454   25,082   (1,409)   2011  7     6,628    18,118    553    6,628    18,671    25,299    (3,249 2011

Willow Park Ind - Ph 2 and 3

  4    15,086   27,044   721   15,086   27,765   42,851   (1,943)   2011  4     15,086    27,044    1,616    15,086    28,660    43,746    (4,559 2011

Willow Park Ind - Ph 4 5 7 8

  8    12,131   65,486   1,824   12,131   67,310   79,441   (4,050)   2011  8     12,131    65,486    2,694    12,131    68,180    80,311    (9,436 2011

Willow Park Ind - Ph 6

  2    3,696   20,929   1,366   3,696   22,295   25,991   (1,494)   2011  2     3,696    20,929    2,196    3,696    23,125    26,821    (3,626 2011

Yosemite Drive

  1    2,439   12,068   165   2,439   12,233   14,672   (677)   2011  1     2,439    12,068    288    2,439    12,356    14,795    (1,567 2011

Zanker-Charcot Industrial

  5    4,867   28,750   289   4,867   29,039   33,906   (1,647)   2011  5     4,867    28,750    1,362    4,867    30,112    34,979    (3,832 2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

San Francisco Bay Area, California

  199    329,567   1,153,228   109,645   329,929   1,262,511   1,592,440   (258,263)     181     295,070    1,061,327    141,620    295,330    1,202,687    1,498,017    (344,107 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Savannah, Georgia

                    

Morgan Bus Ctr

  1    2,161   14,680   49   2,161   14,729   16,890   (733)   2011  1     2,161    14,680    1,234    2,161    15,914    18,075    (1,675 2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Savannah, Georgia

  1    2,161   14,680   49   2,161   14,729   16,890   (733)     1     2,161    14,680    1,234    2,161    15,914    18,075    (1,675 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Seattle, Washington

          

East Valley Warehouse

  1    (d)(e)   10,472    57,825    793    10,472    58,618    69,090    (6,704 2011

Fife Distribution Center

  1     3,245        13,366    3,245    13,366    16,611    (401 2013

Harvest Business Park

  3     3,541    18,827    747    3,541    19,574    23,115    (2,488 2011

Kent Centre Corporate Park

  4     5,397    21,599    656    5,397    22,255    27,652    (2,856 2011

Kingsport Industrial Park

  7     16,605    48,942    2,233    16,800    50,980    67,780    (8,620 2011

Northwest Distribution Center

  3     5,114    24,090    1,747    5,114    25,837    30,951    (3,273 2011

ProLogis Park SeaTac

  2    (d  12,230    14,170    3,453    12,457    17,396    29,853    (3,124 2008

Puget Sound Airfreight

  1     1,408    4,201    210    1,408    4,411    5,819    (572 2011

Renton Northwest Corp. Park

  4     5,102    17,946    478    5,102    18,424    23,526    (2,800 2011

SEA Cargo Center North

  1         10,279    40        10,319    10,319    (5,674 2011

SEA Cargo Center South

  1         2,745    11        2,756    2,756    (2,722 2011

Sumner Landing

  1    (e  10,332    32,545    767    10,332    33,312    43,644    (3,391 2011

Van Doren’s Distribution Center

  1    (d  3,166    7,716    7    3,166    7,723    10,889    (58 2014
 

 

   

 

 

  

Seattle, Washington

  30     76,612    260,885    24,508    77,034    284,971    362,005    (42,683 
 

 

   

 

 

  

South Florida

          

Airport West Distribution Center

  2    (d  1,253    3,825    4,109    1,974    7,213    9,187    (3,697 1995, 1998

Beacon Centre

  18     37,998    196,004    8,256    37,998    204,260    242,258    (24,652 2011

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

 No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
 Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
 Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
  Encum-
brances
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Land Building &
Improvements
 Total
(a,b)
 

Seattle, Washington

          

East Valley Warehouse

  1  (e)  10,472   57,825   668   10,472   58,493   68,965   (2,946)   2011

Harvest Business Park

  3  (e)  3,541   18,827   108   3,541   18,935   22,476   (1,063)   2011

Kent Centre Corporate Park

  4  (e)  5,397   21,599   335   5,397   21,934   27,331   (1,222)   2011

Kingsport Industrial Park

  7    16,605   48,942   1,035   16,605   49,977   66,582   (3,706)   2011

Northwest Distribution Center

  3  (e)  5,114   24,090   1,013   5,114   25,103   30,217   (1,374)   2011

ProLogis Park SeaTac

  2  (d)  12,230   14,170   3,345   12,457   17,288   29,745   (1,841)   2008

Puget Sound Airfreight

  1    1,408   4,201   37   1,408   4,238   5,646   (251)   2011

Renton Northwest Corp. Park

  4  (d)  5,102   17,946   183   5,102   18,129   23,231   (1,222)   2011

Sumner 3/4 Landing

  1  (e)  10,332   32,545   261   10,332   32,806   43,138   (1,468)   2011
 

 

   

 

 

  

Seattle, Washington

  26    70,201   240,145   6,985   70,428   246,903   317,331   (15,093)   
 

 

   

 

 

  

South Florida

          

Airport West Distribution Center

  2  (d)  1,253   3,825   3,720   1,974   6,824   8,798   (3,202)   1995, 1998

Beacon Centre

  18    37,998   196,004   3,515   37,998   199,519   237,517   (10,527)   2011

Beacon Industrial Park

  8  (d)  20,139   68,093   1,239   20,139   69,332   89,471   (3,621)   2011  8    (d  20,139    68,093    3,405    20,139    71,498    91,637    (8,627 2011

Beacon Lakes

  2     6,504        18,865    6,504    18,865    25,369    (308 2012, 2014

Blue Lagoon Business Park

  2  (d)  9,189   29,451   1,082   9,189   30,533   39,722   (1,733)   2011  2    (d  9,189    29,451    1,336    9,189    30,787    39,976    (4,025 2011

Boca Distribution Center

  1    1,474   5,918   805   1,474   6,723   8,197   (1,420)   2006

CenterPort Distribution Center

  5  (d)  8,977   22,766   1,861   9,096   24,508   33,604   (6,613)   1999, 2012  5    (d  8,802    22,504    3,121    8,922    25,505    34,427    (8,511 1999, 2012

Cobia Distribution Center

  2  (d)  4,632   10,565   696   4,632   11,261   15,893   (701)   2011

Copans Distribution Center

  2    504   2,857   1,098   504   3,955   4,459   (1,852)   1997, 1998  2     504    2,857    1,486    504    4,343    4,847    (2,151 1997, 1998

Dade Distribution Center

  1    2,589   14,669   327   2,589   14,996   17,585   (3,795)   2005

Dolphin Distribution Center

  1    2,716   7,364   828   2,716   8,192   10,908   (572)   2011  1     2,716    7,364    866    2,716    8,230    10,946    (1,397 2011

International Corp Park

  2    10,596   15,898   428   10,596   16,326   26,922   (1,375)   2010  2     10,596    15,898    2,211    10,596    18,109    28,705    (2,643 2010

Marlin Distribution Center

  1    1,844   6,603   9   1,844   6,612   8,456   (459)   2011  1     1,844    6,603    361    1,844    6,964    8,808    (1,041 2011

Miami Airport Business Center

  6    11,173   45,921   1,591   11,173   47,512   58,685   (2,795)   2011  6     11,173    45,921    2,115    11,173    48,036    59,209    (6,548 2011

North Andrews Distribution Center

  1    698   3,956   258   698   4,214   4,912   (2,483)   1994  1     698    3,956    391    698    4,347    5,045    (2,804 1994

Pompano Beach Distribution Center

  3    11,035   15,136   3,324   11,035   18,460   29,495   (1,605)   2008  3     11,035    15,136    3,692    11,035    18,828    29,863    (2,772 2008

Pompano Center of Commer

  5    5,171   13,930   167   5,171   14,097   19,268   (736)   2011  5     5,171    13,930    391    5,171    14,321    19,492    (1,689 2011

Port Lauderdale Distribution Center

  3  (d)  6,517   9,133   9,253   7,826   17,077   24,903   (3,639)   1997, 2012  7    (d  37,472    69,457    9,239    38,781    77,387    116,168    (5,328 1997, 2012, 2014

ProLogis Park I-595

  2  (d)  1,998   11,326   697   1,999   12,022   14,021   (4,027)   2003  2    (d  1,998    11,326    959    1,999    12,284    14,283    (4,932 2003

Sawgrass Distribution Center

  2    10,016       14,964   10,016   14,964   24,980   (943)   2009  2     10,016       15,142    10,016    15,142    25,158    (1,876 2009

Tarpon Distribution Center

  1  (d)  1,847   6,451   138   1,847   6,589   8,436   (498)   2011  1     1,847    6,451    179    1,847    6,630    8,477    (1,153 2011
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

South Florida

  68    150,366   489,866   46,000   152,516   533,716   686,232   (52,596)     70     178,955    518,776    76,124    181,106    592,749    773,855    (84,154 
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

  

Southern California

                    

Anaheim Industrial Center

  13  (d)  32,275   59,983   2,284   32,275   62,267   94,542   (15,234)   2005  12     31,086    57,836    2,815    31,086    60,651    91,737    (19,039 2005

Anaheim Industrial Property

  1    5,096   10,816   3   5,096   10,819   15,915   (606)   2011  1     5,096    10,816    71    5,096    10,887    15,983    (1,375 2011

Arrow Ind. Park

  2  (d)  4,840   8,120   555   4,840   8,675   13,515   (309)   2012  2     4,840    8,120    866    4,840    8,986    13,826    (1,125 2012

Artesia Industrial

  19    68,691   145,492   1,945   68,691   147,437   216,128   (9,151)   2011  19     68,691    145,492    5,223    68,691    150,715    219,406    (21,283 2011

Bell Ranch Distribution

  4    5,539   23,092   1,376   5,539   24,468   30,007   (1,426)   2011  4     5,539    23,092    1,657    5,539    24,749    30,288    (3,491 2011

Brea Ind Ctr

  1    2,488   4,062   29   2,488   4,091   6,579   (138)   2012  1     2,488    4,062    287    2,488    4,349    6,837    (471 2012

California Commerce Center

  4  (d)  16,432   26,531   1,626   16,432   28,157   44,589   (895)   2012  5     18,708    35,633    2,465    18,708    38,098    56,806    (3,457 2012, 2014

Carson Dist Ctr

  1    15,491       16,967   15,491   16,967   32,458   (344)   2011  1     15,491       17,000    15,491    17,000    32,491    (1,330 2011

Carson Industrial

  12    13,608   32,802   562   13,608   33,364   46,972   (2,133)   2011  12     13,608    32,802    3,166    13,608    35,968    49,576    (5,068 2011

Carson Town Center

  2    11,781   31,572   171   11,781   31,743   43,524   (1,624)   2011  2     11,781    31,572    698    11,781    32,270    44,051    (3,711 2011

Cedarpointe Ind Park

  5  (d)  7,824   12,476   443   7,824   12,919   20,743   (421)   2012  5     7,824    12,476    664    7,824    13,140    20,964    (1,488 2012

Chartwell Distribution Center

  1    6,417   16,964   204   6,417   17,168   23,585   (997)   2011  1     6,417    16,964    801    6,417    17,765    24,182    (2,347 2011

Chino Ind Ctr

  4    850   1,274   10   850   1,284   2,134   (138)   2012  4     850    1,274    10    850    1,284    2,134    (649 2012

Commerce Ind Ctr

  1  (d)  11,345   17,653   62   11,345   17,715   29,060   (552)   2012  1     11,345    17,653    88    11,345    17,741    29,086    (1,833 2012

Corona Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  4,249   6,657       4,249   6,657   10,906   (211)   2012

Crossroads Business Park

  7  (d)  21,393   82,655   97,222   74,914   126,356   201,270   (25,557)   2005, 2010  9    (d  36,131    98,797    126,748    89,658    172,018    261,676    (35,650 2005, 2010, 2014

Del Amo Industrial Center

  1    7,471   17,889   240   7,471   18,129   25,600   (1,204)   2011  1     7,471    17,889    386    7,471    18,275    25,746    (2,734 2011

Dominguez North Industrial Center

  7  (d)  21,951   36,464   1,038   21,976   37,477   59,453   (3,467)   2007, 2012  6    (d  20,662    34,382    2,883    20,688    37,239    57,927    (6,222 2007, 2012

Eaves Distribution Center

  3  (d)  13,914   31,041   1,167   13,914   32,208   46,122   (2,171)   2011  3     13,914    31,041    1,953    13,914    32,994    46,908    (5,156 2011

Foothill Bus Ctr

  3  (d)  5,254   8,096   40   5,254   8,136   13,390   (249)   2012  3     5,254    8,096    117    5,254    8,213    13,467    (836 2012

Ford Distribution Cntr

  7    29,895   81,433   659   29,895   82,092   111,987   (5,826)   2011  7     29,895    81,433    2,875    29,895    84,308    114,203    (13,365 2011

Fordyce Distribution Center

  1  (d)  6,110   19,485   292   6,110   19,777   25,887   (1,461)   2011  1     6,110    19,485    765    6,110    20,250    26,360    (3,379 2011

Fullerton Industrial Center

  1    3,831   7,115   298   3,831   7,413   11,244   (1,822)   2005

Harris Bus Ctr Alliance II

  9  (d)  13,134   66,195   613   13,134   66,808   79,942   (3,912)   2011  9     13,134    66,195    1,967    13,134    68,162    81,296    (8,942 2011

Haven Distribution Center

  4  (d)  96,975   73,903   7,237   96,975   81,140   178,115   (8,257)   2008  4    (d  96,975    73,903    7,620    96,975    81,523    178,498    (13,312 2008

Industry Distribution Center

  8  (d)(e)  54,170   99,434   4,325   54,170   103,759   157,929   (24,122)   2005, 2012  8    (d)(e)   54,170    99,434    4,891    54,170    104,325    158,495    (31,872 2005, 2012

Inland Empire Distribution Center

  8  (d)  47,859   101,753   7,702   48,639   108,675   157,314   (17,365)   2005, 2012  6    (d  37,805    66,530    8,469    38,585    74,219    112,804    (21,549 2005, 2012

International Multifoods

  1    4,700   8,036   404   4,700   8,440   13,140   (505)   2011

Kaiser Distribution Center

  8  (d)(e)  131,819   242,618   26,714   136,030   265,121   401,151   (65,791)   2008, 2008  8    (d)(e)   131,819    242,618    20,367    136,030    258,774    394,804    (80,093 2005, 2008

LAX Cargo Center

  3        19,217    193       19,410    19,410    (4,789 2011

Los Angeles Industrial Center

  2    3,777   7,015   335   3,777   7,350   11,127   (1,867)   2005  2     3,777    7,015    353    3,777    7,368    11,145    (2,425 2005

Meridian Park

  1    12,931   24,268   86   12,931   24,354   37,285   (3,952)   2008  1     12,931    24,268    142    12,931    24,410    37,341    (5,629 2008

Mid Counties Industrial Center

  18    (d  55,436    96,453    15,386    55,437    111,838    167,275    (35,190 2005, 2006, 2010,
2012

Mill Street Dist Ctr

  1     1,825    4,572       1,825    4,572    6,397    (36 2014

Mill Street Spec Dist Ctr

  1    (d  15,691    38,520    1    15,691    38,521    54,212    (294 2014

Milliken Dist Ctr

  1     18,831    30,811    219    18,831    31,030    49,861    (3,458 2012

NDP—Los Angeles

  5     14,855    41,115    2,020    14,855    43,135    57,990    (6,677 2011

Normandie Industrial

  1     12,297    14,957    726    12,297    15,683    27,980    (2,717 2011

North County Dist Ctr

  3     49,949    76,943    4,061    49,949    81,004    130,953    (8,910 2011, 2012

Ontario Dist Ctr

  1     18,823    29,524    482    18,823    30,006    48,829    (3,099 2012

Orange Industrial Center

  1     4,156    7,836    349    4,157    8,184    12,341    (2,561 2005

Pacific Bus Ctr

  5     20,810    32,169    1,675    20,810    33,844    54,654    (3,467 2012

ProLogis Park Ontario

  2    (d  25,499    47,366    813    25,499    48,179    73,678    (12,505 2007

Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Center

  4    (d)(e)   46,471    86,305    2,091    46,472    88,395    134,867    (27,341 2005

Redlands Comm Ctr

  1     20,583    32,750       20,583    32,750    53,333    (254 2014

Redlands Distribution Center

  7    (d  69,051    99,842    74,367    72,589    170,671    243,260    (18,529 2006, 2007, 2012,

2013, 2014

Rialto Dist Ctr

  4    (d  73,396    204,161    442    73,396    204,603    277,999    (15,058 2012, 2014

Riverbluff Distribution Center

  1    (d  42,964       32,928    42,964    32,928    75,892    (6,090 2009

Riverside Dist Ctr (LAX)

  2     2,178    3,440    150    2,178    3,590    5,768    (375 2012

Santa Ana Distribution Center

  2     4,318    8,019    759    4,318    8,778    13,096    (2,786 2005

South Bay Distribution Center

  4    (d  14,478    27,511    3,489    15,280    30,198    45,478    (10,026 2005, 2007

Starboard Distribution Ctr

  1     18,763    53,824    119    18,763    53,943    72,706    (6,883 2011

Terra Francesco

  1     11,196       15,591    11,196    15,591    26,787    (117 2012

Torrance Dist Ctr

  1     25,730    40,414    287    25,730    40,701    66,431    (4,234 2012

Transpark Inland Empire Dist Ctr

  1    (d  28,936    44,721       28,936    44,721    73,657    (329 2014

Van Nuys Airport Industrial

  4     23,455    39,916    2,588    23,455    42,504    65,959    (5,018 2011

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

Mid Counties Industrial Center

  18  (d)  55,436   96,453   14,038   55,437   110,490   165,927   (26,202)   2005, 2006,
2010, 2012

Milliken Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  18,906   30,811   167   18,906   30,978   49,884   (1,042)   2012

NDP - Los Angeles

  5    14,855   41,115   511   14,855   41,626   56,481   (2,868)   2011

Normandie Industrial

  1    12,297   14,957   448   12,297   15,405   27,702   (1,159)   2,011

North County Dist Ctr

  3    49,949   76,943   130   49,949   77,073   127,022   (2,596)   2011, 2012

Ontario Dist Ctr

  1  (d)  18,823   29,524   68   18,823   29,592   48,415   (937)   2012

Orange Industrial Center

  1    4,156   7,836   334   4,157   8,169   12,326   (1,954)   2005

Pacific Bus Ctr

  5  (d)  20,810   32,169   937   20,810   33,106   53,916   (994)   2012

ProLogis Park Ontario

  2  (d)  25,499   47,366   512   25,499   47,878   73,377   (9,228)   2007

Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Center

  4  (d)(e)  46,471   86,305   1,249   46,472   87,553   134,025   (21,199)   2005

Redlands Distribution Center

  3  (d)  27,060   66,820   28,466   28,328   94,018   122,346   (11,462)   2006, 2007, 2012

Rialto Dist Ctr

  2  (d)  26,499   109,921   114   26,499   110,035   136,534   (3,435)   2012

Riverbluff Distribution Center

  1  (d)  42,964       32,809   42,964   32,809   75,773   (3,810)   2009

Riverside Dist Ctr (LAX)

  2    2,178   3,440   32   2,178   3,472   5,650   (111)   2012

Santa Ana Distribution Center

  2    4,318   8,019   662   4,318   8,681   12,999   (2,100)   2005

South Bay Distribution Center

  4  (d)  14,478   27,511   3,042   15,280   29,751   45,031   (7,441)   2005, 2007

Spinnaker Logistics

  1  (d)  13,483   22,081   716   13,483   22,797   36,280   (1,363)   2011

Starboard Distribution Ctr

  1    18,763   53,824   35   18,763   53,859   72,622   (3,035)   2011

Torrance Dist Ctr

  1    25,038   39,377   4   25,038   39,381   64,419   (1,255)   2012

Union Pacific Dist Ctr

  1    1,746   2,783   3   1,746   2,786   4,532   (129)   2012

Van Nuys Airport Industrial

  4    23,455   39,916   234   23,455   40,150   63,605   (2,075)   2011

Vernon Distribution Center

  15    25,439   47,250   3,373   25,441   50,621   76,062   (12,812)   2005

Vernon Industrial

  2    3,626   3,319   175   3,626   3,494   7,120   (914)   2011

Vista Distribution Center

  1    4,150   6,225   2,153   4,150   8,378   12,528   (330)   2012

Vista Rialto Distrib Ctr

  1    5,885   25,991   24   5,885   26,015   31,900   (1,305)   2011

Walnut Drive

  1    2,665   7,397   5   2,665   7,402   10,067   (420)   2011

Watson Industrial Center AFdII

  1  (d)  6,944   11,193       6,944   11,193   18,137   (652)   2011

Wilmington Avenue Warehouse

  2    11,172   34,723   432   11,172   35,155   46,327   (1,946)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Southern California

  228    1,209,175   2,278,163   265,282   1,269,787   2,482,833   3,752,620   (324,481)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

St. Louis, Missouri

          

Earth City Industrial Center

  2    657   4,141   1,930   657   6,071   6,728   (3,315)   1998

Gateway Commerce Ctr

  1  (d)  6,285   27,662       6,285   27,662   33,947   (954)   2012

Westport Distribution Center

  1    365   1,247   2,296   365   3,543   3,908   (1,890)   1997
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

St. Louis, Missouri

  4    7,307   33,050   4,226   7,307   37,276   44,583   (6,159)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Tampa, Florida

          

Tampa West Distribution Center

  1    578   4,051   396   578   4,447   5,025   (2,775)   1994
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Tampa, Florida

  1    578   4,051   396   578   4,447   5,025   (2,775)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Mexico:

          

Agua Fria Ind. Park

  5  (d)  8,073   24,560   8,312   8,073   32,872   40,945   (771)   2011, 2012

Arrayanes IP (REIT)

  1    2,016   3,775   2,681   2,016   6,456   8,472   (116)   2011

Bermudez Industrial Center

  2    1,155   4,619   4,110   1,158   8,726   9,884   (2,257 2007

Bosques Industrial Park

  1  (d)  1,983   6,256   1,029   1,983   7,285   9,268   (616 2011

Carrizal Ind Park

  3  (d)  2,778   42,692   273   2,778   42,965   45,743   (1,597 2011

Cedros-Tepotzotlan Distribution Center

  2  (d)  11,990   6,719   17,158   12,799   23,068   35,867   (3,945 2006, 2007

Centro Industrial Center

  3    8,274       14,172   8,274   14,172   22,446   (1,445 2009

Del Norte Industrial Center II

  3    2,803   13,515   1,038   2,803   14,553   17,356   (846 2008, 2012

El Puente Industrial Center

  2    1,906   5,823   1,827   1,889   7,667   9,556   (1,233 2008

El Salto Distribution Center

  2  (d)  4,473   6,159   2,141   4,449   8,324   12,773   (666 2008

Iztapalapa Distribution Center

  1    1,287   7,294       1,287   7,294   8,581   (95 2012

Libramiento Aeropuerto

  2    1,614   8,289       1,614   8,289   9,903   (285 2012

Los Altos Ind Park

  3  (d)  4,579   26,300   8,113   4,579   34,413   38,992   (1,235 2011

Mezquite III prefund

  1  (d)  906   14,419   41   906   14,460   15,366   (795 2011

Monterrey Airport

  3  (d)  9,263   12,878   17,026   9,218   29,949   39,167   (2,376 2007, 2008

Monterrey Industrial Park

  8  (d)  12,079   32,861   1,111   12,409   33,642   46,051   (1,074 1997, 2011

Nor-T Distribution Center

  4    7,247   32,135   5,731   5,898   39,215   45,113   (8,566 2006

Ojo de Agua Ind Ctr

  1  (d)  1,826   11,447   1,139   1,826   12,586   14,412   (450 2011

Pacifico Distr Ctr

  4    2,886   14,736   325   2,886   15,061   17,947   (1,093 2011

Palma 1 Dist. Ctr.

  1    1,972   4,888   201   1,972   5,089   7,061   (377 2011

Parque Opcion

  1    730   2,287       730   2,287   3,017   (209 2011

Periferico Sur Industrial Park

  1    1,016   5,757       1,016   5,757   6,773      2012

Pharr Bridge Industrial Center

  3    6,460   18,516   12,889   6,523   31,342   37,865   (2,342 2008, 2009, 2012

Piracanto Ind Park

  4    11,646   33,660   27   11,646   33,687   45,333   (1,847 2011

ProLogis Park Alamar

  3    20,540   17,081   (203  20,536   16,882   37,418   (1,579 2008
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried at
December 31, 2014
  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description  Encum-
brances
 Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

Vernon Distribution Center

  15     25,439    47,250    3,912    25,441    51,160    76,601    (16,728 2005

Vernon Industrial

  2     3,626    3,319    197    3,626    3,516    7,142    (2,084 2011

Vista Distribution Center

  1     4,150    6,225    3,415    4,150    9,640    13,790    (1,569 2012

Vista Rialto Distrib Ctr

  1     5,885    25,991    242    5,885    26,233    32,118    (3,188 2011

Walnut Drive

  1     2,665    7,397    218    2,665    7,615    10,280    (960 2011

Watson Industrial Center AFdII

  1     6,944    11,193    65    6,944    11,258    18,202    (1,478 2011

Wilmington Avenue Warehouse

  2     11,172    34,723    2,389    11,172    37,112    48,284    (4,629 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Southern California

  236     1,353,384    2,485,362    384,521    1,416,273    2,806,994    4,223,267    (509,210 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

St. Louis, Missouri

          

Earth City Industrial Center

  3     807    4,992    2,057    807    7,049    7,856    (3,800 1998, 2014

Hazelwood Dist Ctr

  2     833    4,721    24    833    4,745    5,578    (49 2014

Westport Distribution Center

  3     824    3,849    2,403    824    6,252    7,076    (2,316 1997, 2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

St. Louis, Missouri

  8     2,464    13,562    4,484    2,464    18,046    20,510    (6,165 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Guadalajara

          

Parque Opcion

  1     730    2,287    1,362    730    3,649    4,379    (504 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Guadalajara

  1     730    2,287    1,362    730    3,649    4,379    (504 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Mexico City

          

Puente Grande Distribution Center

  1     9,106       15,795    9,106    15,795    24,901    (137 2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Mexico City

  1     9,106       15,795    9,106   ��15,795    24,901    (137 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Canada - Toronto

          

Airport Rd. Dist Ctr

  1     26,084    73,382    2,343    27,262    74,547    101,809    (7,860 2011

Annagem Dist. Center

  1     3,518    12,035    850    3,677    12,726    16,403    (1,394 2011

Annagem Distrib Centre II

  1     1,981    5,076    873    2,070    5,860    7,930    (708 2011

Bolton Distribution Center

  1     7,973       24,803    8,333    24,443    32,776    (2,890 2009

Keele Distribution Center

  1     1,239    4,972    529    1,295    5,445    6,740    (823 2011

Meadowvale Dist Ctr

  1     14,647       21,297    15,027    20,917    35,944    (135 2014

Millcreek Distribution Ctr

  2     8,630    32,829    688    9,020    33,127    42,147    (3,612 2011

Milton 401 Bus. Park

  1     6,733    22,057    3,087    7,036    24,841    31,877    (2,985 2011

Milton 402 Bus Park

  2     11,044    37,861    868    11,416    38,357    49,773    (2,412 2011, 2014

Milton Crossings Bus Pk

  2     19,664    47,864    3,555    20,551    50,532    71,083    (5,415 2011

Mississauga Gateway Center

  6     54,233    132,288    830    54,509    132,842    187,351    (2,398 2008, 2014

Pearson Logist. Ctr

  2     12,545    44,969    1,381    13,111    45,784    58,895    (4,815 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Canada

  21     168,291    413,333    61,104    173,307    469,421    642,728    (35,447 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal North American Markets:

  1,542     3,903,706    11,363,912    2,316,367    4,004,395    13,579,590    17,583,985    (2,631,273 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

European Markets

          

Austria

          

Himberg DC

  1     3,714       5,872    3,724    5,862    9,586    (571 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Austria

  1     3,714       5,872    3,724    5,862    9,586    (571 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Belgium

          

Boom Distribution Ct

  1     13,672    18,478    81    13,672    18,559    32,231    (2,090 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Belgium

  1     13,672    18,478    81    13,672    18,559    32,231    (2,090 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Czech Republic

    

Uzice Distribution Center

  1     2,701       17,441    2,701    17,441    20,142    (3,517 2007
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Czech Republic

  1     2,701       17,441    2,701    17,441    20,142    (3,517 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

France

          

Bonneuil Distribution Center

  1           16,587       16,587    16,587    (3,852 2012

Isle d’Abeau Distribution Center

  1     3,175    14,247    3,428    4,332    16,518    20,850    (2,493 2011

LGR Genevill. 1 SAS

  1     2,237    2,427    817    2,237    3,244    5,481    (326 2011

LGR Genevill. 2 SAS

  1     1,720    3,564    41    1,720    3,605    5,325    (349 2011

Moissy II Distribution Center

  1     5,551       7,454    5,501    7,504    13,005    (93 2014

Port of Rouen

  1        15,480    88       15,568    15,568    (2,054 2011

Vemars Distribution Center

  1     8,300       12,679    8,300    12,679    20,979    (210 2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

France

  7     20,983    35,718    41,094    22,090    75,705    97,795    (9,377 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Germany

          

Hausbruch Ind Ctr 4-B

  1     8,294    5,395    130    8,294    5,525    13,819    (1,571 2011

Hausbruch Ind Ctr 5-650

  1     2,986    460    244    2,986    704    3,690    (120 2011

Huenxe Dist Ctr

  1     2,062       9,220    1,587    9,695    11,282    (572 2012

Kolleda Distribution Center

  1     257    3,974    (318  257    3,656    3,913    (514 2008

Lauenau Dist Ctr

  1     2,784    6,197    296    2,784    6,493    9,277    (819 2011

Meerane Distribution Center

  1     686    5,274    (242  686    5,032    5,718    (670 2008

Muggensturm

  2     3,533    14,328    128    3,533    14,456    17,989    (1,876 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Germany

  8     20,602    35,628    9,458    20,127    45,561    65,688    (6,142 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

Puente Grande Distribution Center

  2   (d)    14,975   6,813   14,394   14,889   21,293   36,182   (2,287)   2008, 2009

Ramon Rivera Lara Industrial Center

  1    444       4,494   2,269   2,669   4,938   (891)   2000

Reynosa Ind Ctr

  1    756   3,976       756   3,976   4,732   (143)   2012

Reynosa Ind Ctr III

  4    3,072   16,676       3,072   16,676   19,748   (589)   2012

Tijuana Ind Ctr Iilam

  1    1,297   7,160       1,297   7,160   8,457   (232)   2012

Tijuana Infd Ctr

  9    9,587   52,761       9,587   52,761   62,348   (1,829)   2012

Toluca Distribution Center

  1   (d)    7,952       16,344   7,952   16,344   24,296   (1,289)   2009

Tres Rios

  4   (d)    14,009   14,600   11,103   14,750   24,962   39,712   (331)   2011, 2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Mexico

  87    181,594   458,652   145,476   183,840   601,882   785,722   (43,406)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Canada:

          

Airport Rd. Dist Ctr

  1    30,345   85,368   1,678   31,715   85,676   117,391   (4,035)   2011

Annagem Dist. Center

  1    4,093   14,000   878   4,278   14,693   18,971   (708)   2011

Annagem Distrib Centre II

  1    2,304   5,905   437   2,408   6,238   8,646   (335)   2011

Bolton Distribution Center

  1    9,275       28,789   9,694   28,370   38,064   (1,823)   2009

Keele Distribution Center

  1    1,442   5,785   326   1,507   6,046   7,553   (340)   2011

Millcreek Distribution Ctr

  2    10,040   38,191   524   10,493   38,262   48,755   (1,857)   2011

Milton 401 Bus. Park

  1    7,832   25,660   355   8,186   25,661   33,847   (1,181)   2011

Milton 402 Bus Park

  1    7,288   21,804   328   7,616   21,804   29,420   (1,044)   2011

Milton Crossings Bus Pk

  2    22,876   55,682   3,903   23,908   58,553   82,461   (2,756)   2011

Mississauga Gateway Center

  1    2,338   8,121   452   2,424   8,487   10,911   (1,098)   2008

Pearson Logist. Ctr

  2    14,594   52,313   1,393   15,253   53,047   68,300   (2,452)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Canada

  14    112,427   312,829   39,063   117,482   346,837   464,319   (17,629)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal Americas

  1,547    3,349,780   9,983,555   1,764,094   3,447,101   11,650,328   15,097,429   (2,040,139)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

European Markets:

          

Austria

          

Himberg DC

  1    4,070       6,415   4,082   6,403   10,485   (265)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Austria

  1    4,070       6,415   4,082   6,403   10,485   (265)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Belgium

          

Boom Distribution Ct

  1    14,979   20,246       14,979   20,246   35,225   (999)   2011

Liege Park

  1    499   20,156   74   499   20,230   20,729   (1,221)   2011

Tongeren Dist Ctr

  1   (d)    858   15,577   (501  858   15,076   15,934   (915)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Belgium

  3    16,336   55,979   (427  16,336   55,552   71,888   (3,135)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Czech Republic

          

Ostrava Distribution Center

  2    8,082   58,144   (5,289  9,718   51,219   60,937   (5,315)   2008

Prague East Dist Ctr

  9   (d)    22,937   74,285   (3,537  22,966   70,719   93,685   (5,623)   2011

Prague West

  3   (d)    5,800   24,156   601   5,800   24,757   30,557   (1,895)   2011

Prague-Jirny Dist. Ctr

  1    6,093       11,573   6,093   11,573   17,666   (344)   2012

Stenovice Distribution Center

  3    4,270   32,786   12,215   4,902   44,369   49,271   (4,183)   2008, 2009

Uzice Distribution Center

  3    8,289       56,840   8,289   56,840   65,129   (7,403)   2007, 2009
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Czech Republic

  21    55,471   189,371   72,403   57,768   259,477   317,245   (24,763)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

France

          

Aulnay Dist Ctr

  2    7,875   42,816   (8,547  7,875   34,269   42,144   (2,458)   2011

Belfort Dist Ctr

  1    2,494   20,334   (702  2,494   19,632   22,126   (1,319)   2011

Blois Dist Ctr

  1    4,922   35,247   (1,311  4,922   33,936   38,858   (3,156)   2011

Cavaillon Dist Ctr

  1   (d  1,330   18,140   (287  1,330   17,853   19,183   (1,413)   2011

Clesud Grans Miramas Distribution Center

  6   (d  11,109   101,463   (2,365  11,109   99,098   110,207   (6,628)   2011

Evry Dist Ctr

  5   (d  20,415   129,473   (1,965  20,415   127,508   147,923   (10,132)   2011

FM Portfolio Acquisition

  1    6,861   23,141   (455  6,861   22,686   29,547   (1,816)   2011

Isle dAbeau C

  1    3,782   13,646   5   3,782   13,651   17,433   (687)   2011

Isle d’Abeau DC

  1    3,815   25,223   7   3,815   25,230   29,045   (1,008)   2011

Isle d’Abeau Distribution Center

  12   (d  33,160   167,372   8,292   33,160   175,664   208,824   (16,236)   2011

Le Havre DC

  1    6,278   12,573   (576  6,278   11,997   18,275   (582)   2011

Le Havre Distribution Center

  6   (d  13,785   91,818   12,441   13,785   104,259   118,044   (7,650)   2009, 2011

LGR Genevill. 1 SAS

  1    2,451   2,659   869   2,451   3,528   5,979   (152)   2011

LGR Genevill. 2 SAS

  1    1,884   3,905   12   1,884   3,917   5,801   (164)   2011

Lille Dist Ctr

  3   (d  5,284   39,849   (989  5,284   38,860   44,144   (2,383)   2011

Lognes Dist Ctr

  1    3,059   10,807   (560  3,059   10,247   13,306   (884)   2011

Metz Dist Ctr

  1   (d  2,235   8,112   (286  2,235   7,826   10,061   (630)   2011

Mitry Mory Distribution Center

  2    6,996   44,314   (2,060  6,996   42,254   49,250   (3,696)   2011
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried at
December 31, 2014
  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description  Encum-
brances
 Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

Hungary

          

Budapest-Sziget Dist. Center

  2     3,361    8,768    5,588    3,399    14,318    17,717    (1,125 2008, 2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Hungary

  2     3,361    8,768    5,588    3,399    14,318    17,717    (1,125 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Italy

          

Arena Po Dist Ctr

  2     8,275    22,399    103    8,275    22,502    30,777    (3,939 2011

Castel San Giovanni Dist Ctr

  1     3,439    10,501    146    3,439    10,647    14,086    (1,460 2011

Siziano Logis Park

  1     10,985    19,914    838    10,985    20,752    31,737    (2,412 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Italy

  4     22,699    52,814    1,087    22,699    53,901    76,600    (7,811 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Poland

          

Nadarzyn Distribution Center

  1     2,511        7,733    2,508    7,736    10,244    (1,138 2009

Piotrkow II Distribution Center

  1     1,633        5,564    1,590    5,607    7,197    (947 2009

Sochaczew Distribution Center.

  2     133    11,797    1,997    773    13,154    13,927    (2,430 2008

Szczecin Distribution Center

  1     310        4,419    310    4,419    4,729    (32 2014

Teresin Dist Ctr

  2     3,395    17,739    951    4,024    18,061    22,085    (2,486 2011

Wroclaw V DC

  3     8,687        32,462    8,687    32,462    41,149    (944 2013, 2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Poland

  10     16,669    29,536    53,126    17,892    81,439    99,331    (7,977 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Romania

          

Bucharest Distribution Center

  4     7,007    30,630    11,642    8,758    40,521    49,279    (7,729 2007, 2008
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Romania

  4     7,007    30,630    11,642    8,758    40,521    49,279    (7,729 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Slovakia

          

Bratislava Distribution Center

  1     2,393        10,840    2,393    10,840    13,233    (346 2012

Sered Distribution Center

  1     2,424        13,139    2,424    13,139    15,563    (1,791 2009
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Slovakia

  2     4,817        23,979    4,817    23,979    28,796    (2,137 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Spain

          

Barajas MAD Logistics

  4         39,276    937        40,213    40,213    (5,759 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Spain

  4         39,276    937        40,213    40,213    (5,759 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Sweden

          

Orebro Dist Ctr

  1     10,064    22,004    2,196    10,064    24,200    34,264    (4,551 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Sweden

  1     10,064    22,004    2,196    10,064    24,200    34,264    (4,551 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

United Kingdom

          

Midpoint Park

  2     31,375    12,061    19,207    31,407    31,236    62,643    (1,972 2008, 2013

North Kettering Bus Pk

  1     2,518    7,477    7,187    3,759    13,423    17,182    (3,634 2007
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

United Kingdom

  3     33,893    19,538    26,394    35,166    44,659    79,825    (5,606 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal European Markets:

  48     160,182    292,390    198,895    165,109    486,358    651,467    (64,392 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Asia Markets

          

China

          

Dalian Ind. Park DC

  1     2,538    14,543    108    2,443    14,746    17,189    (1,468 2011

Fengxian Logistics C

  3         13,773    624        14,397    14,397    (3,566 2011

Jiaxing Distri Ctr

  4     11,454    11,104    14,288    11,103    25,743    36,846    (1,625 2011, 2013

Tianjin Bonded LP

  2     1,565    9,485    58    1,502    9,606    11,108    (1,090 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

China

  10     15,557    48,905    15,078    15,048    64,492    79,540    (7,749 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

          

ProLogis Park Aichi Distribution Center

  1     18,428        74,195    24,691    67,932    92,623    (12,927 2007

ProLogis Park Narita III

  1     17,145    60,785    9,604    18,394    69,140    87,534    (9,674 2008
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

  2     35,573    60,785    83,799    43,085    137,072    180,157    (22,601 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Singapore

          

Airport Logistics Center 3

  1         25,736    121        25,857    25,857    (4,124 2011

Changi South Distr Ctr 1

  1         41,942    113        42,055    42,055    (6,144 2011

Changi-North DC1

  1         13,877    1,844        15,721    15,721    (2,108 2011

Singapore Airport Logist Ctr 2

  1         37,267    201        37,468    37,468    (5,983 2011

Tuas Distribution Center

  1         18,929    273        19,202    19,202    (4,461 2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Singapore

  5         137,751    2,552        140,303    140,303    (22,820 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal Asian Markets:

  17     51,130    247,441    101,429    58,133    341,867    400,000    (53,170 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Industrial Operating Properties:

  1,607     4,115,018    11,903,743    2,616,691    4,227,637    14,407,815    18,635,452    (2,748,835 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

Moissy Cramayel Distribution Center

  2    5,127   6,230   19,377   5,158   25,576   30,734   (1,734)   2009, 2011

Orleans Dist Ctr

  7   (d  20,901   133,287   (4,060  20,901   129,227   150,128   (8,766)   2011

Plessis Dist Ctr

  2    5,221   31,824   (991  5,221   30,833   36,054   (2,391)   2011

Port of Rouen

  1        16,960   19       16,979   16,979   (987)   2011

Rennes Distribution Center

  1    571       11,785   571   11,785   12,356   (910)   2009

Savigny le Temple Dist Ctr

  1   (d  1,876   29,923   (903  1,876   29,020   30,896   (2,253)   2011

Strasbourg Distribution Center

  2        30,767   (4,255      26,512   26,512   (2,663)   2008

Vemars Distribution Center

  4    12,992       44,189   12,992   44,189   57,181   (3,173)   2009
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

France

  67    184,423   1,039,883   66,684   184,454   1,106,536   1,290,990   (83,871)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Germany

          

Alzenau Distribution Center

  2   (d  8,080   22,362   (2,693  8,080   19,669   27,749   (1,540)   2008, 2011

Augsburg Distribution Center

  3    12,261       24,670   12,261   24,670   36,931   (1,350)   2009, 2012

Bingen Dist Ctr

  1   (d  5,563   13,210   (695  5,563   12,515   18,078   (1,109)   2011

Cologne Eifeltor Distribution Center

  3   (d  13,291   25,717   7,501   13,000   33,509   46,509   (1,717)   2011, 2012

Gernsheim Dist Ctr

  1   (d  4,867   8,051   (455  4,867   7,596   12,463   (521)   2011

Hannover Airport Dist Ctr

  1    3,490       8,365   3,490   8,365   11,855   (365)   2010

Hausbruch Ind Ctr 4-B

  1    9,087   5,910   132   9,087   6,042   15,129   (768)   2011

Hausbruch Ind Ctr 5-650

  1    3,271   504   7   3,271   511   3,782   (47)   2011

Huenxe Dist Ctr

  1    2,259       10,220   1,739   10,740   12,479   (79)   2012

Kolleda Distribution Center

  1    282   4,354   (348  282   4,006   4,288   (363)   2008

Lauenau Dist Ctr

  1    3,050   6,789   36   3,050   6,825   9,875   (446)   2011

Martinszehnten Dist Ctr

  1    5,332   7,812   40   5,332   7,852   13,184   (580)   2011

Meerane Distribution Center

  1    751   5,778   (266  751   5,512   6,263   (450)   2008

Muggensturm

  2    3,871   15,698   59   3,871   15,757   19,628   (1,021)   2011

Neustadt Dist Ctr

  1   (d  4,661   10,322   (429  4,661   9,893   14,554   (639)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Germany

  21    80,116   126,507   46,144   79,305   173,462   252,767   (10,995)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Hungary

          

Batta Distribution Center

  2    4,147   16,006   3,785   6,046   17,892   23,938   (1,741)   2008, 2010

Budaors Dist Ctr

  1    3,059   16,267   (729  3,059   15,538   18,597   (1,139)   2011

Budapest Park

  3   (d  2,270   27,162   (677  2,270   26,485   28,755   (2,015)   2011

Budapest Park Phase II

  1    963   21,452   (5,039  4,353   13,023   17,376   (1,886)   2008

Budapest-Sziget Dist. Center

  1    2,794   9,606   (734  2,835   8,831   11,666   (732)   2008

Harbor Park Dist Ctr

  10    5,720   62,663   (2,196  5,720   60,467   66,187   (5,178)   2011

Hegyeshalom Distribution Center

  1    976       11,102   1,070   11,008   12,078   (1,328)   2007
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Hungary

  19    19,929   153,156   5,512   25,353   153,244   178,597   (14,019)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Italy

          

Arena Po Dist Ctr

  2    9,066   24,541   109   9,066   24,650   33,716   (1,894)   2011

Bologna Distribution Center

  1   (d  7,836   31,848   (1,304  7,836   30,544   38,380   (2,499)   2011

Castel San Giovanni Dist Ctr

  1    3,768   11,505   34   3,768   11,539   15,307   (847)   2011

Cortemaggiore Dist Ctr

  1    6,652   24,237   (558  6,652   23,679   30,331   (1,843)   2011

Lodi Distribution Center

  7   (d  35,692   110,061   (875  39,721   105,157   144,878   (13,450)   2005, 2006, 2011

Milan West Dist Ctr

  1    4,489   17,468   81   4,489   17,549   22,038   (1,315)   2011

Piacenza Dist Ctr

  4   (d  14,516   46,064   (1,317  14,516   44,747   59,263   (2,819)   2011

Romentino Distribution Center

  4   (d  12,319   29,656   28,394   12,319   58,050   70,369   (6,604)   2006, 2011

Siziano Logis Park

  1    12,036   21,819       12,036   21,819   33,855   (471)   2011

Turin Distribution Center

  1    3,703   15,437   (552  3,703   14,885   18,588   (1,291)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Italy

  23    110,077   332,636   24,012   114,106   352,619   466,725   (33,033)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Netherlands

          

Bleiswijk DC

  1    26,959   13,669   (1,769  26,959   11,900   38,859   (738)   2011

DistriPark Maasvlakte

  3        28,104   (1,319      26,785   26,785   (1,867)   2011

Eemhaven Ind Park

  1        7,325   339       7,664   7,664   (455)   2011

Lijnden DC

  1    7,699   4,947   (543 ��7,699   4,404   12,103   (226)   2011

Schiphol Dist Ctr

  4    19,288   64,227   285   19,288   64,512   83,800   (3,672)   2011

Tilburg Dist Ctr

  2    8,979   48,321   (1,915  8,979   46,406   55,385   (2,835)   2011

Trade Port West Dist Ctr

  3    13,547   29,216   (1,465  13,547   27,751   41,298   (2,007)   2011

Veghel Dist Ctr

  1    3,671   13,793   (547  3,671   13,246   16,917   (913)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Netherlands

  16    80,143   209,602   (6,934  80,143   202,668   282,811   (12,713)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Poland

          

Blonie II Distribution Center

  2    6,793       23,405   6,793   23,405   30,198   (2,006)   2009

Blonie Ind Park

  4   (d  7,080   33,835   (913  7,080   32,922   40,002   (2,185)   2011

Chorzow Distribution Center

  2    15,621       45,725   15,621   45,725   61,346   (3,526)   2009

Nadarzyn Distribution Center

  1    2,751       8,443   2,751   8,443   11,194   (672)   2009
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried at December 31, 2014
  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

 

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

Description  Encum-
brances
 Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

Development Portfolio

          

North American Markets:

          

United States:

          

Atlanta, Georgia

          

Park I-85

  1     3,493        1,643    3,493    1,643    5,136    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Atlanta, Georgia

  1     3,493        1,643    3,493    1,643    5,136    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Boston, Massachusetts

          

Londonderry

  1     10,808        22,717    10,808    22,717    33,525    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Boston, Massachusetts

  1     10,808        22,717    10,808    22,717    33,525    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Central & Eastern, Pennsylvania

          

Carlisle Dist Ctr

  1     13,931        5,963    13,931    5,963    19,894    

I-81 Dist Ctr

  1     6,416        11,128    6,416    11,128    17,544    

Lehigh Valley Distribution Center

  1     2,897        1,213    2,897    1,213    4,110    

Central & Eastern, Pennsylvania

  3     23,244       18,304    23,244    18,304    41,548    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Central Valley, CA

          

Patterson Pass Business Center

  1           12,234       12,234    12,234    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Central Valley, CA

  1           12,234       12,234    12,234    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Charlotte, North Carolina

          

West Pointe Business Center

  1     790       1,819    790    1,819    2,609    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Charlotte, North Carolina

  1     790       1,819    790    1,819    2,609    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

          

Bolingbrook Distribution Center

  1     3,926       9,937    3,926    9,937    13,863    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

  1     3,926       9,937    3,926    9,937    13,863    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Columbus, Ohio

          

Etna Distribution Center

  1     1,167       12,811    1,167    12,811    13,978    2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Columbus, Ohio

  1     1,167       12,811    1,167    12,811    13,978    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas

          

Dallas Corporate Center North Distribution Center

  2     4,430       993    4,430    993    5,423    

Freeport Corp Ctr

  1     458       6,628    458    6,628    7,086    2014

Mountain Creek

  1           4,012       4,012    4,012    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas

  4     4,888       11,633    4,888    11,633    16,521    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denver, Colorado

          

Stapleton Bus Ctr North

  2     7,149       30,482    7,149    30,482    37,631    2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denver, Colorado

  2     7,149       30,482    7,149    30,482    37,631    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

El Paso, Texas

          

Northwestern Corporate Center

  1     768       2,203    768    2,203    2,971    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

El Paso, Texas

  1     768       2,203    768    2,203    2,971    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Houston, Texas

          

Northpark Distribution Center

  2     2,012       10,411    2,012    10,411    12,423    2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Houston, Texas

  2     2,012       10,411    2,012    10,411    12,423    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Las Vegas, Nevada

          

Las Vegas Corporate Center

  1     2,881       7,655    2,881    7,655    10,536    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Las Vegas, Nevada

  1     2,881       7,655    2,881    7,655    10,536    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Memphis, Tennessee

          

DeSoto Distribution Center

  1     938       8,168    938    8,168    9,106    2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Memphis, Tennessee

  1     938       8,168    938    8,168    9,106    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

New Jersey

          

Port Reading Business Park

  4     56,803       92,208    56,803    92,208    149,011    2014
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

New Jersey

  4     56,803       92,208    56,803    92,208    149,011    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Orlando, Florida

          

Beltway Commerce Center

  1     1,485       4,814    1,485    4,814    6,299    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Orlando, Florida

  1     1,485       4,814    1,485    4,814    6,299    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

Piotrkow Distribution Center

  5   (d  10,595   50,429   (2,590  12,122   46,312   58,434   (3,505)   2008, 2011

Piotrkow II Distribution Center

  1    1,789       6,006   1,789   6,006   7,795   (523)   2009

Poznan Park

  4   (d  5,188   18,437   (915  5,188   17,522   22,710   (1,071)   2011

Sochaczew Distribution Center.

  2    146   12,925   2,059   815   14,315   15,130   (1,710)   2008

Szczecin Distribution Center

  1    3,288   21,583   (31  3,295   21,545   24,840   (1,930)   2008

Teresin Dist Ctr

  4   (d  7,981   39,002   623   8,023   39,583   47,606   (2,473)   2011

Wroclaw Distribution Center

  4   (d  9,469   53,375   (1,551  12,034   49,259   61,293   (5,155)   2008, 2011

Wroclaw III Distribution Center

  2    6,599       31,403   6,599   31,403   38,002   (2,784)   2009

Wroclaw V DC

  1    6,039       7,779   6,039   7,779   13,818   (799)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Poland

  33    83,339   229,586   119,443   88,149   344,219   432,368   (28,339)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Romania

          

Bucharest Distribution Center

  4    7,677   33,559   12,418   9,596   44,058   53,654   (5,412)   2007, 2008
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Romania

  4    7,677   33,559   12,418   9,596   44,058   53,654   (5,412)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Slovakia

          

Sered Distribution Center

  1    2,656       14,291   2,656   14,291   16,947   (1,153)   2009
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Slovakia

  1    2,656       14,291   2,656   14,291   16,947   (1,153)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Spain

          

Alcala Dist Ctr

  5   (d  33,641   87,414   (4,005  33,641   83,409   117,050   (6,108)   2011

Barajas MAD Logistics

  4        43,031   850       43,881   43,881   (2,608)   2011

Coslada Dist Ctr

  1    5,707   8,815   29   5,707   8,844   14,551   (666)   2011

Massalaves Distribution Center

  1    2,845       8,506   2,845   8,506   11,351   (663)   2009

Penedes Dist Ctr

  1    7,742   13,058   (791  7,742   12,267   20,009   (1,082)   2011

Sallent Distribution Center

  1    9,409       5,757   9,409   5,757   15,166   (409)   2009

Sant Boi Park

  5    82,049   89,902   (5,766  82,049   84,136   166,185   (5,356)   2011

Tarancon Distribution Center

  1    3,728   18,524   (1,181  3,728   17,343   21,071   (1,537)   2008

Valls Dist Ctr

  1    6,651   18,332   (425  6,651   17,907   24,558   (1,416)   2011

Zaragoza Distribution Center

  1    23,289       33,267   23,289   33,267   56,556   (2,208)   2010
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Spain

  21    175,061   279,076   36,241   175,061   315,317   490,378   (22,053)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Sweden

          

Jonkoping Distribution Center

  1    2,419       63,510   2,672   63,257   65,929   (4,773)   2009

Norrkoping Dist Ctr

  2    18,127   42,081   (1,020  18,127   41,061   59,188   (3,342)   2011

Orebro Dist Ctr

  1    11,027   24,108   1,270   11,027   25,378   36,405   (2,354)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Sweden

  4    31,573   66,189   63,760   31,826   129,696   161,522   (10,469)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

United Kingdom

          

Bermuda Park Dist Ctr

  1   (d  5,126   24,336   (980  5,126   23,356   28,482   (1,826)   2011

Bromford Gate Dist Ctr

  5   (d  13,040   24,306   (1,252  13,040   23,054   36,094   (1,927)   2011

Central Park Rugby Dist Ctr

  1    9,091   7,856   (466  9,128   7,353   16,481   (578)   2011

Coventry Distribution Center

  3   (d  11,535   57,852   (2,324  11,535   55,528   67,063   (3,916)   2011

Crewe Distribution Center

  1    12,099   19,906   2,416   12,099   22,322   34,421   (1,917)   2008

Dagenham

  1    11,492   9,000   544   11,492   9,544   21,036   (538)   2011

Daventry Phase II Dist Ctr

  2   (d  4,559   23,623   (900  4,559   22,723   27,282   (1,526)   2011

Dirft Dist Ctr

  1    11,279       9,171   11,279   9,171   20,450   (332)   2011

Drayton Fields Dist Ctr

  3   (d  6,011   31,031   618   6,011   31,649   37,660   (1,967)   2011

Fort Dunlop Dist Ctr

  1    6,169   6,820   (319  6,194   6,476   12,670   (512)   2011

Grange Park

  1   (d  2,125   11,451   (419  2,134   11,023   13,157   (762)   2011

Hayes Distribution Center

  1    6,021       18,350   15,968   8,403   24,371   (997)   2007

Marston Gate Dist Ctr

  6   (d  61,361   60,185   (1,946  61,612   57,988   119,600   (3,757)   2011

Middlewhich Dist Ctr

  1    2,132   11,493   (448  2,141   11,036   13,177   (769)   2011

Midpoint Park

  2    30,502   31,452   (4,845  30,811   26,298   57,109   (2,143)   2008

New Parks Leicester

  1   (d  4,708   12,427   (572  4,727   11,836   16,563   (752)   2011

North Kettering Bus Pk

  2   (d  12,405   24,714   7,744   12,472   32,391   44,863   (2,813)   2007, 2011

Pineham Distribution Center

  3    46,238   31,106   23,303   40,263   60,384   100,647   (4,323)   2008, 2012

Stafford Distribution Center

  1    7,870       15,856   7,934   15,792   23,726   (2,377)   2007

Wakefield Bldg

  1    1,386   7,556   (196  1,392   7,354   8,746   (472)   2011

Wembley Dist Ctr

  1    14,610   6,824   140   14,670   6,904   21,574   (413)   2011
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

United Kingdom

  39    279,759   401,938   63,475   284,587   460,585   745,172   (34,617)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal European Markets:

  273    1,130,630   3,117,482   523,437   1,153,422   3,618,127   4,771,549   (284,837)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Asian Markets:

          

China

          

Dalian Ind. Park DC

  1    2,493   14,283   37   2,493   14,320   16,813   (614)   2011

Fengxian Logistics C

  3    —       13,526   19   —       13,545   13,545   (1,479)   2011
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
at December 31, 2014
  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

 

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

 
Description  Encum-
brances
 Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

Portland, Oregon

          

Southshore Corporate Center

  1     1,003       9,986    1,003    9,986    10,989    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Portland, Oregon

  1     1,003       9,986    1,003    9,986    10,989    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

South Florida

          

Beacon Lakes

  2     7,369       17,464    7,369    17,464    24,833     2014  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

South Florida

  2     7,369       17,464    7,369    17,464    24,833    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Southern California

          

CAT - Kaiser Comm Ctr

  1     4,851       2,648    4,851    2,648    7,499    

International Multifoods

  1     4,700       9,135    4,700    9,135    13,835    

Redlands Distribution Center

  1     16,628       24,565    16,628    24,565    41,193     2014  

Rialto Dist Ctr

  1     13,026       8,502    13,026    8,502    21,528    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Southern California

  4     39,205       44,850    39,205    44,850    84,055    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mexico

          

Centro Industrial Center

  1     1,252       270    1,252    270    1,522    

El Puente Industrial Center

  1     1,767       4,944    1,767    4,944    6,711    

Los Altos Ind Park

  1     2,586       8,421    2,586    8,421    11,007     2014  

Monterrey Airport

  1     11,917       12,850    11,917    12,850    24,767    

PDX Corporate Center North/South

  1     14,493       10,850    14,493    10,850    25,343    

Toluca Distribution Center

  1     5,336       3,492    5,336    3,492    8,828    

Tres Rios

  2     8,364       13,627    8,364    13,627    21,991     2014  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mexico

  8     45,715       54,454    45,715    54,454    100,169    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Canada

          

Meadowvale Dist Ctr

  1     21,456       28,624    21,456    28,624    50,080     2014  

Milton 402 Bus Park

  3     10,311       33    10,311    33    10,344    

Tapscott Dist Ctr

  1     3,110       4,227    3,110    4,227    7,337    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Canada

  5     34,877       32,884    34,877    32,884    67,761    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal North American Markets:

  45     248,521       406,677    248,521    406,677    655,198    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

European Markets

          

Czech Republic

          

Prague Airport Distribution Center

  2     5,087       8,737    5,087    8,737    13,824    

Prague-Jirny Dist. Ctr

  2     5,411        1,911    5,411    1,911    7,322    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Czech Republic

  4     10,498        10,648    10,498    10,648    21,146    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

France

          

LG Roissy Sorbiers SAS

  1     5,508        13,600    5,508    13,600    19,108    

Presles Dist Ctr

  1     537        8,656    537    8,656    9,193    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

France

  2     6,045        22,256    6,045    22,256    28,301    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Germany

          

Peine Dist Ctr

  1     3,411        1,677    3,411    1,677    5,088    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Germany

  1     3,411        1,677    3,411    1,677    5,088    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Netherlands

          

Tilburg Dist Ctr

  1     5,381        4,390    5,381    4,390    9,771    

Venlo Dist. Center.

  1     7,085        9,724    7,085    9,724    16,809    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Netherlands

  2     12,466        14,114    12,466    14,114    26,580    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Poland

          

Wroclaw Distribution Center

  1     3,937        8,290    3,937    8,290    12,227     2014  

Wroclaw V DC

  1     2,787        9,411    2,787    9,411    12,198     2014  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Poland

  2     6,724        17,701    6,724    17,701    24,425    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Slovakia

          

Bratislava Distribution Center

  1     1,919        8,024    1,919    8,024    9,943    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Slovakia

  1     1,919        8,024    1,919    8,024    9,943    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Spain

          

Puerta de Madrid Distribution Center

  1     7,126        1,263    7,126    1,263    8,389    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Spain

  1     7,126        1,263    7,126    1,263    8,389    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sweden

          

Gothenburg Distribution Center

  1     3,720        11,953    3,720    11,953    15,673     2014  

Ljungby Distribution Center

  1     647        2,437    647    2,437    3,084    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sweden

  2     4,367        14,390    4,367    14,390    18,757    
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20122014

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

 

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
  Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
 
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

Jiaxing Distri Ctr

  1    2,694   10,905   182   2,615   11,166   13,781   (492)    2011 

Tianjin Bonded LP

  2    1,537   9,315   9   1,537   9,324   10,861   (458)    2011 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

China

  7    6,724   48,029   247   6,645   48,355   55,000   (3,043)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

          

Ebina Distribution Center

  1   (d  61,221       36,975   61,221   36,975   98,196   (2,542)    2010 

Fukuoka Manami DC 2

  1   (d  14,492   45,434   34   14,492   45,468   59,960   (2,291)    2011 

Iwanuma I Land

  1    6,193   37,120   6,906   6,607   43,612   50,219   (3,609)    2008 

Kasugai DC 1

  1   (d  59,969   81,898   210   59,969   82,108   142,077   (3,465)    2011 

Kawajima Park

  1   (d  616       241,420   47,788   194,248   242,036   (3,299)    2011 

Kitanagoya Distribution Center

  1   (d  27,349       67,010   30,231   64,128   94,359   (4,030)    2009 

Nanko Naka DC 1

  1   (d  13,171   52,040   107   13,171   52,147   65,318   (2,337)    2011 

ProLogis Park Aichi Distribution Center

  1    25,600       102,799   34,301   94,098   128,399   (11,734)    2007 

ProLogis Park Ichikawa

  1   (d  88,676   160,919   34,288   95,509   188,374   283,883   (16,547)    2008 

ProLogis Park Maishima III

  1   (d  24,398   95,668   12,350   26,151   106,265   132,416   (10,252)    2008 

ProLogis Park Maishima IV

  1   (d  29,174   97,693   54   29,174   97,747   126,921   (4,331)    2010 

ProLogis Park Narita III

  1    23,818   84,443   13,167   25,552   95,876   121,428   (8,515)    2008 

ProLogis Park Osaka II

  1   (d  29,745       194,904   39,854   184,795   224,649   (22,076)    2007 

Sendai Tagajo DC

  1   (d  18,006   38,124   3,235   18,006   41,359   59,365   (2,480)    2011 

Shinkiba Dist Crtr 1

  1   (d  52,694   97,860   222   52,694   98,082   150,776   (4,437)    2011 

Shiohama Distr Ctr 1

  1    24,105   28,907       24,105   28,907   53,012   (576)    2011 

Takatsuki Distribution Center

  1   (d  268       41,120   20,464   20,924   41,388   (477)    2012 

Tosu II Land

  1   (d  80       27,374   6,300   21,154   27,454   (221)    2012 

Tosu lV

  1   (d  120       35,225   9,667   25,678   35,345   (538)    2012 

Tsurumi Dist Ctr 1

  1   (d  30,511   122,592   89   30,511   122,681   153,192   (5,401)    2011 

Zama Distribution Center

  1   (d  58,069       186,139   64,188   180,020   244,208   (12,807)    2009 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

  21    588,275   942,698   1,003,628   709,955   1,824,646   2,534,601   (121,965)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Singapore

          

Airport Logistics Center 3

  1        27,877   129       28,006   28,006   (1,930)    2011 

Changi South Distr Ctr 1

  1        45,429           45,429   45,429   (2,884)    2011 

Changi-North DC1

  1        15,031   66       15,097   15,097   (969)    2011 

Singapore Airport Logist Ctr 2

  1        40,366   156       40,522   40,522   (2,801)    2011 

Tuas Distribution Center

  1        20,503   112       20,615   20,615   (2,074)    2011 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Singapore

  5        149,206   463       149,669   149,669   (10,658)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal Asian Markets:

  33    594,999   1,139,933   1,004,338   716,600   2,022,670   2,739,270   (135,666)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Industrial Operating Properties:

  1,853    5,075,409   14,240,970   3,291,869   5,317,123   17,291,125   22,608,248   (2,460,642)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Development Portfolio

          

Americas Markets:

          

United States:

          

Atlanta, GA

          

Park I-75 South

  1    6,571       13,968   6,571   13,968   20,539    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Atlanta, GA

  1    6,571       13,968   6,571   13,968   20,539   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Baltimore/Washington

          

Gateway Bus Ctr

  2    2,356       12,780   2,356   12,780   15,136    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Baltimore/Washington

  2    2,356       12,780   2,356   12,780   15,136   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Central & Eastern PA

          

Lehigh Valley Distribution Center

  1    4,465       7,245   4,465   7,245   11,710    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Central & Eastern PA

  1    4,465       7,245   4,465   7,245   11,710   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Central Valley, CA

          

Tracy II Distribution Center

  1    12,765       12,147   12,765   12,147   24,912    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Central Valley, CA

  1    12,765       12,147   12,765   12,147   24,912   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Dallas/Fort Worth, TX

          

Lancaster Distribution Center

  1    2,974       10,785   2,974   10,785   13,759    2012 

Mesquite Dist III

  1    1,411       9,917   1,411   9,917   11,328    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Dallas/Fort Worth, TX

  2    4,385       20,702   4,385   20,702   25,087   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Houston, TX

          

Northpark Distribution Center

  3    3,807       7,962   3,807   7,962   11,769    2012 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Houston, TX

  3    3,807       7,962   3,807   7,962   11,769   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.
  No. of
Bldgs.
     Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried at
December 31, 2014
  

Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)

  

Date of
Construction/
Acquisition

 
Description  Encum-
brances
 Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

United Kingdom

          

Boscombe Road Distribution Center

  1     16,206        14,850    16,206    14,850    31,056     2014  

Dirft Dist Ctr

  2     85,368        60,515    85,368    60,515    145,883    

Grange Park

  1     16,797        14,451    16,797    14,451    31,248    

Heathrow Phase 3 Distribution Center

  2     14,174        11,409    14,174    11,409    25,583     2014  

Littlebrook Dist Ctr

  1     12,360        14,817    12,360    14,817    27,177    

Midpoint Park

  2             12,275        12,275    12,275    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

United Kingdom

  9     144,905        128,317    144,905    128,317    273,222    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal European Markets:

  24     197,461        218,390    197,461    218,390    415,851    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Asian Markets

          

Japan

          

Chiba New Town Distribution Center

  1     31,079        1,166    31,079    1,166    32,245    

Hisayama Dist Ctr

  1     5,120        18,739    5,120    18,739    23,859    

Joso Dist Ctr

  1     12,140        26,160    12,140    26,160    38,300     2014  

Kitamoto Distribution Center

  1     18,460        55,668    18,460    55,668    74,128     2014  

Narashino IV Distribution Center

  1             19,239        19,239    19,239    

Narita 1

  1     9,361        20,368    9,361    20,368    29,729    

Osaka 5

  1     35,475        70,429    35,475    70,429    105,904    

ProLogis Parc Tomiya III

  1     8,609        22,868    8,609    22,868    31,477    

ProLogis Park Sendai

  1     4,913        3,437    4,913    3,437    8,350    

Yoshimi Distribution Center

  1     21,258        18,442    21,258    18,442    39,700    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

  10     146,415        256,516    146,415    256,516    402,931    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal Asian Markets:

  10     146,415        256,516    146,415    256,516    402,931    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Development Portfolio

  79     592,397        881,583    592,397    881,583    1,473,980    
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

GRAND TOTAL

  1,686     4,707,415    11,903,743    3,498,274    4,820,034    15,289,398    20,109,432    (2,748,835 
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2012

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
 Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total
(a,b)
   

New Jersey/New York City

          

Ports Jersey City Distribution Center

  1    17,672       1,176   17,672   1,176   18,848   2012

Secaucus Dist Ctr

  2    9,599       25,137   9,599   25,137   34,737   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

New Jersey/New York City

  3    27,271       26,313   27,271   26,313   53,585   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Phoenix, AZ

          

Riverside Dist Ctr (PHX)

  1    2,251       7,479   2,251   7,479   9,730   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Phoenix, AZ

  1    2,251       7,479   2,251   7,479   9,730   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Seattle, WA

          

Fife Distribution Center

  1    2,803       2,744   2,803   2,744   5,547   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Seattle, WA

  1    2,803       2,744   2,803   2,744   5,547   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

South Florida

          

Beacon Lakes

  1    3,288       9,318   3,288   9,318   12,606   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

South Florida

  1    3,288       9,318   3,288   9,318   12,606   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Southern California

          

Redlands Distribution Center

  1    18,620       15,308   18,620   15,308   33,927   2012

Terra Francesco

  1    11,196       13,277   11,196   13,277   24,473   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Southern California

  2    29,816       28,585   29,816   28,585   58,400   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mexico:

          

Los Altos Ind Park

  1    3,376       5,264   3,376   5,264   8,640   2012

Monterrey Airport

  1    3,563       3,384   3,563   3,384   6,947   2012

Toluca Distribution Center

  1    3,951       1,564   3,951   1,564   5,515   2012

Tres Rios

  2    14,140       8,418   14,140   8,418   22,558   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mexico

  5    25,030       18,630   25,030   18,630   43,660   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Canada:

          

Meadowvale Dist Ctr

  2    38,773       14,729   38,773   14,729   53,502   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Canada

  2    38,773       14,729   38,773   14,729   53,502   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal Americas Markets:

  25    163,581       182,602   163,581   182,602   346,183   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

European Markets:

          

France

          

Bonneuil Distribution Center

  1            13,711       13,711   13,711   2012

Evry Dist Ctr

  1            1,036       1,036   1,036   2012

Moissy Cramayel Distribution Center

  1    4,387       18,790   4,387   18,790   23,177   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

France

  3    4,387       33,537   4,387   33,537   37,924   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Poland

          

Janki Distribution Center

  2    943       8,099   943   8,099   9,042   2012

Wroclaw V DC

  1    2,324       9   2,324   9   2,333   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Poland

  3    3,267       8,108   3,267   8,108   11,375   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Slovakia

          

Bratislava Distribution Center

  1    2,622       10,435   2,622   10,435   13,057   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Slovakia

  1    2,622       10,435   2,622   10,435   13,057   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

United Kingdom

          

Midpoint Park

  1    16,228       313   16,228   313   16,541   2012

North Kettering Bus Pk

  1    684       999   684   999   1,683   2012

Park Ryton Dist Ctr

  1    10,799       7,945   10,799   7,945   18,744   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

United Kingdom

  3    27,711       9,257   27,711   9,257   36,968   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal European Markets:

  10    37,987       61,337   37,987   61,337   99,324   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Asian Markets:

          

China

          

Jiaxing Distri Ctr

  3    3,020       2,353   3,020   2,353   5,373   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

China

  3    3,020       2,353   3,020   2,353   5,373   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Japan

          

Amagasaki DC 2 (fund)

  1    29,549       5,021   29,549   5,021   34,570   2012

Kawanishi Distribution Center

  1    32,057       7,601   32,057   7,601   39,658   2012

Kitamoto Distribution Center

  1    24,297       659   24,297   659   24,956   2012

Kobe Distribution Center

  1    12,060       790   12,060   790   12,850   2012

PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2012

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)

  No. of
Bldgs.
  Encum-
brances
 Initial Cost to
Prologis
  Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent

To
Acquisition
  Gross Amounts At Which Carried
as of December 31, 2012
  Accumulated
Depreciation
(c)
  Date of
Construction/
Acquisition
Description   Land  Building &
Improvements
   Land  Building &
Improvements
  Total (a,b)   

Narashino IV Distribution Center

  1    37,718       47,100   37,718   47,100   84,818   2012

Nishiyodogawa DC

  1            131,887       131,887   131,887   2012

Zama Distribution Center

  1    60,478       111,547   60,478   111,547   172,024   2012
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Japan

  7    196,159       304,605   196,159   304,605   500,763   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Subtotal Asian Markets:

  10    199,179       306,958   199,179   306,958   506,136   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Development Portfolio

  45    400,747       550,897   400,747   550,897   951,643   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

GRAND TOTAL

  1,898    5,476,156   14,240,970   3,842,766   5,717,870   17,842,022   23,559,891   (2,460,642)   
 

 

 

   

 

 

  

Schedule III – Footnotes

 

(a)Reconciliation of real estate assets per Schedule III to ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheet as ofat December 31, 20122014 (in thousands):

 

Total per Schedule III

  $23,559,891    $20,109,432  

Land

   1,794,364     1,577,786  

Other real estate investments

   454,868     502,927  
  

 

    

 

 

Total per consolidated balance sheet

  $            25,809,123    (f  $            22,190,145 (f) 

 

(b)The aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes at December 31, 20122014 of our real estate assets was approximately $17.9$14.0 billion (unaudited).

 

(c)Real estate assets (excluding land balances) are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. These useful lives are generally 5five to 7seven years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements on developed buildings, 30 years for acquired industrial properties and 40 years for properties we develop.

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation per Schedule III to ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets as ofat December 31, 20122014 (in thousands):

 

Total accumulated depreciation per Schedule III

  $2,460,642   $            2,748,835  

Accumulated depreciation on other real estate investments

   20,018    41,946  
  

 

   

 

 

Total per consolidated balance sheet

  $            2,480,660   $2,790,781  

 

(d)Properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $8.5$4.5 billion secure $4.1$2.3 billion of mortgage notes. See Note 109 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.8 for more information related to our secured mortgage debt.

 

(e)Assessment bonds of $16.9$15.5 million are secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $860.3$783.4 million. See Note 109 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.8 for more information related to our assessment bonds.

 

(f)A summary of activity for our real estate assets and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

  2012   2011   2010   2014   2013   2012 

Real estate assets:

            

Balance at beginning of year

  $22,413,079   $11,080,161   $12,010,668   $18,822,081    $23,559,891    $22,413,079  

Acquisitions of operating properties, transfers of development completions from CIP, improvements to operating properties and net effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and other

   2,881,005     12,150,482    631,860 

Acquisitions of operating properties, improvements to operating properties, development activity, transfers of land to CIP and net effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and other

   3,595,836     2,050,810     2,881,005  

Basis of operating properties disposed of

   (1,630,764)     (906,602)     (1,410,511)     (2,713,300)     (6,857,994)     (1,630,764)  

Change in the development portfolio balance, including the acquisition of properties

   91,112    495,169    174,235    452,963     69,374     91,112  

Impairment of real estate properties (1)

   (194,541)     (21,237)     (400)               (194,541)  

Assets transferred to held-for-sale

       (384,894)     (325,691)     (48,148)            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at end of year

  $        23,559,891   $        22,413,079   $        11,080,161   $        20,109,432    $        18,822,081    $        23,559,891  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Accumulated Depreciation:

            

Balance at beginning of year

  $2,150,713   $1,589,251   $1,663,233   $2,540,267    $2,460,642    $2,150,713  

Depreciation expense

   665,239     574,524    298,164    490,298     505,691     665,239  

Balances retired upon disposition of operating properties and net effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and other

   (355,310)     (994)     (337,845)     (277,516)     (426,066)     (355,310)  

Assets transferred to held-for-sale

       (12,068)     (34,301)     (4,214)            
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at end of year

  $2,460,642   $2,150,713   $1,589,251   $2,748,835    $2,540,267    $2,460,642  

 

 

(1)The impairment charges we recognized in 2012 2011, and 2010 were primarily due to our change of intent to no longer hold these assets for long-term investment. See Note 1615 to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information related to our impairment charges.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

PROLOGIS, INC.

By:

 

/s/ HamidHAMID R. MoghadamMOGHADAM

 Hamid R. Moghadam
 Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 27, 201325, 2015

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, Inc., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, Inc. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/  HAMID R. MOGHADAM

Hamid R. Moghadam

  Chairman of the Board and Co-ChiefChief Executive Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  THOMAS S. OLINGER

Thomas S. Olinger

  Chief Financial Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  LORI A. PALAZZOLO

Lori A. Palazzolo

  Senior Vice PresidentManaging Director and Chief Accounting Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  GEORGE L. FOTIADES

George L. Fotiades

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  CHRISTINE N. GARVEY

Christine N. Garvey

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  LYDIA H. KENNARD

Lydia H. Kennard

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  J. MICHAEL LOSH

J. Michael Losh

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  IRVING F. LYONS III

Irving F. Lyons III

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  DAVID P. O’CONNOR

David P. O’Connor

DirectorFebruary 25, 2015

/s/  JEFFREY L. SKELTON

Jeffrey L. Skelton

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  D. MICHAEL STEUERT

D. Michael Steuert

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  CARL B. WEBB

Carl B. Webb

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  WILLIAM D. ZOLLARS

William D. Zollars

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

PROLOGIS, L.P.

By:

 Prologis, Inc., its general partner

By:

 

/s/ HamidHAMID R. MoghadamMOGHADAM

 Hamid R. Moghadam
 Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 27, 201325, 2015

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, L.P., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, L.P. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/  HAMID R. MOGHADAM

Hamid R. Moghadam

  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  THOMAS S. OLINGER

Thomas S. Olinger

  Chief Financial Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  LORI A. PALAZZOLO

Lori A. Palazzolo

  Senior Vice PresidentManaging Director and Chief Accounting Officer February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  GEORGE L. FOTIADES

George L. Fotiades

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  CHRISTINE N. GARVEY

Christine N. Garvey

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  LYDIA H. KENNARD

Lydia H. Kennard

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  J. MICHAEL LOSH

J. Michael Losh

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  IRVING F. LYONS III

Irving F. Lyons III

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  DAVID P. O’CONNOR

David P. O’Connor

DirectorFebruary 25, 2015

/s/  JEFFREY L. SKELTON

Jeffrey L. Skelton

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  D. MICHAEL STEUERT

D. Michael Steuert

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  CARL B. WEBB

Carl B. Webb

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

/s/  WILLIAM D. ZOLLARS

William D. Zollars

  Director February 27, 201325, 2015

Certain of the following documents are filed herewith. Certain other of the following documents that have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and, pursuant to Rule 12b-32, are incorporated herein by reference.

 

3.1  Articles of Incorporation of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement onForm S-11 (No. 333-35915) filed September 18, 1997).
3.2  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 6 1/2% 1/2% Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 20, 2003).
3.3  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 6 3/4% 3/4% Series M Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.17 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed November 12, 2003).
3.4  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.00% Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed December 12, 2005).
3.5  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 6.85% Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.18 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed August 24, 2006).
3.6  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 2, 2011).
3.7  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the Series R Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 2, 2011).
3.8  Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the Series S Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 2, 2011).
3.9  Articles of Merger of New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland corporation, with and into Prologis, Inc., a Maryland corporation, changing the name of “AMB Property Corporation” to “Prologis, Inc.”, as filed with the Stated Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 2, 2011, and effective June 3, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.10  Articles of Amendment (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
3.11  Seventh Amended and Restated Bylaws of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.12  Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.13  Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.14First Amendment to Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis, L.P., dated February 27, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014).
3.15Articles Supplementary dated April 3, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report onForm 8-K filed on April 3, 2014).
3.16Articles Supplementary redesignating and reclassifying all 300,000 shares of 6.5% Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2014).
4.1  Form of Certificate for Common Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 12, 2011).
4.2Form of Certificate for 6 1/2% Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 20, 2003).
4.3Form of Certificate for 6 3/4% Series M Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed November 12, 2003).
4.4Form of Certificate for 7.00% Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed December 12, 2005).
4.5Form of Certificate for 6.85% Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed August 24, 2006).
4.6  Form of Certificate for the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 28, 2011).
4.7Form of Certificate for the Series R Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 28, 2011).
4.8Form of Certificate for the Series S Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 28, 2011).
4.9  Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.104.4  First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, in respect of the Operating Partnership’s 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2037, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.11Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, in respect of the Operating Partnership’s 1.875% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2037, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).

4.12Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, in respect of the Operating Partnership’s 2.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2038, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.13Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, in respect of the Operating Partnership’s 3.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2015, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.(No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.144.5Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2013, among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.6Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).

4.7Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.8  Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.154.9  First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.164.10  Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.174.11  Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.18Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2000, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed November 16, 2000 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed November 16, 2000).
4.19Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 7, 2002, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).
4.20Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 11, 2005, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005).
4.214.12  Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2006, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.224.13  Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.234.14  Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.244.15  Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2010).
4.254.16  Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 12, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.264.17  Specimen of 7.50% Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to and included in Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.275.094% Notes due 2015 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005).
4.28Form of Fixed Rate Medium-Term Note, Series C, and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.29Form of Floating Rate Medium-Term Note, Series C, and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.30$175,000,000 Fixed Rate Note No. FXR-C-1 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2006).

4.31$325,000,000 Fixed Rate Note No. FXR-C-2 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on 8-K filed May 1, 2008 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on 8-K filed May 1, 2008).
4.326.125% Notes due 2016 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.334.18  6.625% Notes due 2019 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.344.19  4.500% Notes due 2017 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2010).
4.354.20  4.00% Notes due 2018 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.36Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 5.500% Notes due March 1, 2013 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.42 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.37Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 7.625% Notes due August 15, 2014 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.43 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.38Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 7.810% Notes due February 1, 2015 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.44 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.39Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 9.340% Notes due March 1, 2015 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.40Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 5.625% Notes due November 15, 2015 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.46 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.41Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 5.750% Notes due April 1, 2016 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.47 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.42Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 8.650% Notes due May 15, 2016 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.48 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.43Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 5.625% Notes due November 15, 2016 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.49 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.44Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 6.250% Notes due March 15, 2017 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.50 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.454.21  Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 7.625% Notes due July 1, 2017 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.51 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.46Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 6.625% Notes due May 15, 2018 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.52 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.474.22  Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 7.375% Notes due October 30, 2019 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.53 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.484.23  Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 6.875% Notes due March 15, 2020 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 3, 2011).
4.494.24  Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 2.250% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2037 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to and included in Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.50Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 1.875% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2037 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to and included in Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.51Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 2.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2038 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to and included in Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.52Form of Global Note Representing the Operating Partnership’s 3.250% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2015 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to and included in Exhibit 4.6 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.(No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.534.25  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 5.500%2.750% Notes due March 1, 20132019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.604.4 to Prologis’ Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891)8-K filed May 3, 2011)August 15, 2013).
4.26Form of 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.273.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2013).
4.28Form of 3.000% Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).

4.544.29  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 7.625%3.375% Notes due August 15, 20142024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.614.3 to Prologis’ Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891)8-K filed May 3, 2011)February 18, 2014).
4.554.30  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 7.810%3.00% Notes due February 1, 20152026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.624.2 to Prologis’ Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891)8-K filed on May 3, 2011)28, 2014).
4.564.31  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 9.340%1.375% Notes due March 1, 20152020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.634.2 to Prologis’ Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891)8-K filed May 3, 2011)on October 6, 2014).
4.57Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 5.625% Notes due November 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.64 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.58Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 5.750% Notes due April 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.65 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.59Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 8.650% Notes due May 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.66 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.60Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 5.625% Notes due November 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.67 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.61Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 6.250% Notes due March 15, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.68 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.624.32  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 7.625% Notes due July 1, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.69 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.63Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 6.625% Notes due May 15, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.70 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.644.33  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 7.375% Notes due October 30, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.71 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.654.34  Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the Operating Partnership’s 6.875% Notes due March 15, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.72 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-173891) filed May 3, 2011).
4.664.35  WarrantOfficers’ Certificate related to Purchase Common Stock, dated December 20, 2012the 2.750% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.36Officers’ Certificate related to the 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.37Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 20, 2012)November 1, 2013).
4.38Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.375% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.39Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the 3.00% Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014).
4.40Form of Officer’s Certificate related to 1.375% Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-k filed on October 6, 2014).

Other debt instruments are omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Registration S-K. Copies of such instruments will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

10.1  Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Limited Partnership-I, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Trust’s Registration Statement (No. 33-73382)) .
10.2  Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Fraser, L.P., dated as of August 4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
10.3  Fifteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis 2, L.P., (f/k/a AMB Property II, L.P.) dated February 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.4  Exchange Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005, by and between the Operating Partnership and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005).
10.5  Transfer and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1993, by and among the Trust and the persons set forth therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Trust’s Registration Statement (No. 33-73382)).
10.6  Registration Rights Agreement dated February 9, 2007, between the Trust and each of the parties identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.10 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.7  Form of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Prologis and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915) filed September 18, 1997).
10.8  Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009, by and between Prologis and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2009).
10.9  Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 26, 1997, by and among Prologis and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.10  Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005, by and between the Operating Partnership and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005).
10.11  Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 14, 2003, by and among Prologis 2, L.P.(formerly known as AMB Property II, L.P.) and the unitholders whose names are set forth on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 17, 2003).
10.12  Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 5, 1999, by and among Prologis, Prologis 2, L.P. and the unitholders whose names are set forth on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).

10.13  Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006, by and among Prologis, Prologis 2, L.P., J.A. Green Development Corp. and JAGI, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.14*10.14Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2013, by and among Prologis, Inc., Prologis 2, L.P. and Bakar AMB Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
10.15Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2015, among Prologis, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2015).
10.16*  The Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.15*10.17*  Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.16*10.18*  Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
10.17*10.19*  Amended and Restated 2002 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006).
10.18*10.20*  The Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007).
10.19*Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).
10.20*Prologis 2011 Notional Account Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.21*Prologis Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 13, 2011).
10.22*  Prologis Outperformance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2011).
10.23*10.22*  Prologis Private Capital Promote PlanForm of Participation Points and LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2011)on February 27, 2014).
10.23*Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2014).
10.24*  Form of Prologis, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2014).
10.25*Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.26*Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (LTIP Unit election) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.27*Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014) .
10.28*Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Bonus exchange) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.29*ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Trust’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 2, 2006).
10.25*10.30*  First Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010).
10.26*10.31*  Second Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2010).
10.27*10.32*  Third Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).
10.28*10.33*  Form of Non Qualified Share Option Award Terms; The Trust 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.29*10.34*  Form of Restricted Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.30*10.35*  Form of Performance Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).

10.31*
10.36*  ProLogis 2000 Share Option Plan for Outside Trustees (as Amended and Restated Effective as of December 31, 2009) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to ProLogis’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
10.32*10.37*  ProLogis Trust 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective as of September 26, 2002) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K dated February 19, 2003).
10.33*10.38*  First Amendment of ProLogis 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to ProLogis’ Form8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.34*10.39*  ProLogis Deferred Fee Plan for Trustees (As Amended and Restated Effective as of May 14, 2010) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.35*10.40*  Form of Indemnification Agreement between ProLogis and certain directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
10.36*Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreement by and between AMB Property, L.P. and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2007 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2007).

10.37*Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2011, by and between Hamid R. Moghadam and AMB Property III, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.38*Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2011, by and between Guy F. Jaquier and the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.39*Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2011, by and between Eugene F. Reilly and the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.40*Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2011, by and between Thomas S. Olinger and the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
10.41*  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement; Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).
10.42*  Employment Agreement made and entered into on January 30, 2011 and effective as ofat January 1, 2012, by and between Walter C. Rakowich and ProLogis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
10.43*  Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2011, from the Trust to Edward S. NekritzPrologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2910.1 to the Trust’sPrologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.44*Form of Director Deferred Stock Unit Award terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.45*First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of December 6, 2012, by and between Walter C. Rakowich and Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010)2012).
10.44*10.46*  Form of Executive Protection Agreements entered intoChange of Control and Noncompetition Agreement by and between ProLogisPrologis, Inc. and Edward S. Nekritz, effective as of December 31, 2009its executive officers (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23Exhibit 10.2 to ProLogis’Prologis’ Current Report on Form 10-K8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.47*Consulting Agreement, dated January 22, 2014, by and between Guy Jaquier and Prologis, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the yearquarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2008)2014).
10.4510.48  Credit Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, as borrower, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as syndication agent, and HSBC Securities, Inc. and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as documentation agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 1, 2010).
10.4610.49  Guaranty of Payment, dated as of November 29, 2010, by Prologis for the benefit of HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 1, 2010).
10.4710.50  Qualified Borrower Guaranty, dated as of November 29, 2010, by the Operating Partnership for the benefit of HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 1, 2010).
10.4810.51  First Amendment and Waiver, dated as of June 3, 2011, by and among Operating Partnership, as borrower, Prologis, as guarantor, various banks and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2010, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011).
10.4910.52  Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of June 3, 2011, by andJuly 11, 2013, among Prologis, the Operating Partnership,Inc., Prologis, L.P., various subsidiaries and affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as global administrative agent, U.S. funding agent, U.S. swing line lender and a U.S. L/C issuer, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, as Euro funding agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., as Euro swing line lender and a Euro L/C issuer, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Yen funding agent and a Yen L/C issuerAdministrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’sPrologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2011)July 15, 2013).
10.5010.53  ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of June 3, 2011, by andAugust 14, 2013 among Prologis Japan Finance Y.K. (formerly known as AMB Japan Finance Y.K.), as initial borrower, the Operating PartnershipPrologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agentAdministrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.54Guaranty of Payment, dated as of August 14, 2013, among Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent, for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011)August 16, 2013).
10.51Guaranty of Payment, dated as of June 3, 2011, by the Operating Partnership and Prologis for the benefit of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agent for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2011, by and among Prologis Japan Finance Y.K., the Operating Partnership, Prologis, various lenders and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011).
10.5210.55  Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of February 2, 2012, by andJune 19, 2014 among Prologis, the Operating Partnership,Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of the Operating Partnership,Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 8, 2012)on June 24, 2014).
10.53*10.56  First Amendment to the Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of June 26, 2014 among Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012)on June 30, 2014).

10.54*10.57†*  Form of Director Deferred StockPrologis, Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012)Agreement (General form 2015).
10.55*†10.58†*  First Amendment to EmploymentForm of Prologis, Inc. Outperformance Plan LTIP Unit Exchange Award Agreement.
10.59†*Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Equity Exchange Offer LTIP Unit Award Agreement.
10.60†*Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. 2011 Notional Account Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.61†*Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.62†*Second Amended and Restated Prologis 2005 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
10.63†*Time-Sharing Agreement, effective as of December 6, 2012,dated January 21, 2015, by and between Walter C. RakowichProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated and Prologis.Hamid R. Moghadam.
12.1†  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
12.2†  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock/Unit Dividends of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.

21.1†  Subsidiaries of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
23.1†  Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, Inc.
23.2†  Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, L.P.
24.1†  PowersPower of Attorney for Prologis, Inc. (included in signature page of this annual report).
24.2†Power of Attorney for Prologis, L.P. (included in signature page of this annual report).
31.1†  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.2†  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.3†  Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Prologis, L.P.
31.4†  Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P.
32.1†  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2†  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101. INS†  XBRL Instance Document
101. SCH†  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101. CAL†  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101. DEF†  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101. LAB†  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101. PRE†  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

 

 

 *Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement
 Filed herewith

 

134120