the adoption of open source alternatives to commercial software by enterprise software customers;
products, features and functionality developed internally by customers and their IT staff;
products, features or functionality customized and implemented for customers by consultants, systems integrators or other third parties; and
attractiveness of offerings from business processing outsourcers.
For more information about the competitive risks we face, refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Oracle Cloud Operations
Oracle Cloud Operations delivers our SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings to customers through the Oracle Cloud, which is a secure, reliable, scalable, enterprise grade platform that is deployed upon Oracle’s application, platform and infrastructure products and is managed by Oracle employees within a global network of data centers. The Oracle Cloud enables secure and isolated cloud-based instances for each of our customers to access the functionality of our SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings via a broad spectrum of devices and leverages automated software lifecycle management to enable the rapid delivery of the latest cloud technology capabilities as they become available.
Manufacturing
To produce our hardware products, we rely on both our internal manufacturing operations as well as third partythird-party manufacturing partners. Our internal manufacturing operations consist primarily of materials procurement, assembly, testing and quality control of our Oracle Engineered Systems and certain of our enterprise and data center servers, storage systemsproducts and networking products. For all other manufacturing, we generally rely on third partythird-party manufacturing partners to produce our hardware relatedhardware-related components and hardware products and we may involve our internal manufacturing operations in the final assembly, testing and quality control processes for these components and products. We distribute most of our hardware products either from our facilities or partner facilities. Our manufacturing processes substantially are based on standardization of components across product types, centralization of assembly and distribution centers and a “build-to-order” methodology in which products generally are built only after customers have placed firm orders. Production of our hardware products requires that we purchase materials, supplies, product subassemblies and full assemblies from a number of vendors. For most of our hardware products, we have existing alternate sources of supply or such sources are readily available. However, we do rely on sole sources for certain of our hardware products. As a result, we continue to evaluate potential risks of disruption to our supply chain operations. Refer to “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A.1A within this Annual Report for additional discussion of the challenges we encounter with respect to the sources and availability of supplies for our products and the related risks to our business.
Research and Development
We develop the substantial majority of our productsproduct offerings internally. In addition, we have extended our product offerings and intellectual property through acquisitions of businesses and technologies. We also purchase or license intellectual property rights in certain circumstances. Internal development allows us to maintain technical control over the design and development of our products. We have a number of United States and foreign patents and pending applications that relate to various aspects of our products and technology. While we believe that our patents have value, no single patent is essential to us or to any of our principal business segments. Research and development expenditures were $4.9$5.8 billion, $5.5 billion and $5.2 billion in fiscal 20132016,
2015 and $4.5 billion in each of fiscal 2012 and 2011,2014, respectively, or 13%16%, 12%14% and 13% of total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Rapid technological advances in hardware and software development, evolving standards in computer hardware and software technology, changing customer needs and frequent new product introductions, offerings and enhancements characterize the cloud and on-premise software and hardware markets in which we compete. We plan to continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to research and development efforts to maintain and improve our current product and services offerings.
Employees
As of May 31, 2013,2016, we employed approximately 120,000136,000 full-time employees, including approximately 33,00038,000 in sales and marketing, approximately 9,0006,000 in our cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS operations, approximately 10,000 in software license updates and product support, approximately 1,000 in the manufacturing of our hardware systems products, approximately 6,0005,000 in hardware systems support, approximately 25,00023,000 in services, approximately 35,00040,000 in research and development and approximately 11,00013,000 in general and administrative positions. Of these employees, approximately 43,00051,000 were employed in the United States and approximately 77,00085,000 were employed internationally. None of our employees in the United States is represented by a labor union; however, in certain foreign subsidiaries labor unions or workers’ councils represent some of our employees.
Available Information
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available, free of charge, on our Investor Relations web sitewebsite at www.oracle.com/investor as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The information posted on or accessible through our web sitewebsite is not incorporated into this Annual Report.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers are listed below.
Name | Office(s) | |
Lawrence J. Ellison | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Technology Officer and Director | |
Safra A. Catz | Chief Executive Officer and Director | |
Mark V. Hurd | Chief Executive Officer and Director | |
Jeffrey O. Henley | Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director | |
| President, | |
| ||
John F. Fowler | Executive Vice President, Systems | |
| ||
Dorian E. Daley | ||
William Corey West |
Mr. Ellison, 68,71, has been our Chairman of the Board and Chief Technology Officer since September 2014. He served as our Chief Executive Officer andfrom June 1977, when he founded Oracle, until September 2014. He has served as a Director since he founded Oracle in June 1977. He previously served as our Chairman of the Board from May 1995 to January 2004.
Mr. Henley, 68,Ms. Catz, 54, has been our Chief Executive Officer since September 2014. She served as Chairman of the Board sinceour President from January 2004 and as a Director since June 1995. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 1991 to July 2004.
Ms. Catz, 51, has been a President since January 2004,September 2014, our Chief Financial Officer most recently sincefrom April 2011 until September 2014 and has served as a Director since October 2001. She was previously our Chief Financial Officer from November 2005 until September 2008 and our Interim Chief Financial Officer from April 2005 until July 2005. Prior to being named our President, she held various other positions with us since joining Oracle in 1999. She also currently servespreviously served as a director of HSBC Holdings plc.
Mr. Hurd, 56,59, has been aour Chief Executive Officer since September 2014. He served as our President from September 2010 to September 2014 and served as a Director since September 2010. Prior to joining us, he served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of HPHewlett-Packard Company from September 2006 to August 2010 and as Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the Board of Directors of HPHewlett-Packard Company from April 2005 to August 2010.
Mr. Fowler, 52,Henley, 71, has beenserved as our Vice Chairman of the Board since September 2014. He previously served as our Chairman of the Board from January 2004 to September 2014 and has served as a Director since June 1995. He served as our Executive Vice President Systems since February 2010. Priorand Chief Financial Officer from March 1991 to joining us, Mr. Fowler served as Sun Microsystems, Inc.’s Executive Vice President, Systems Group from May 2006 to February 2010, as Executive Vice President, Network Systems Group from May 2004 to May 2006 and as Chief Technology Officer, Software Group from July 2002 to May 2004.
Mr. Kurian, 46,49, has been our President, Product Development since January 2015. He served as our Executive Vice President, Product Development sincefrom July 2009.2009 until January 2015. He served as our Senior Vice President of Development from February 2001 until July 2009. Mr. Kurian worked in Oracle Server Technologies as Vice President of Development from March 1999 until February 2001. He also held various other positions with us since joining Oracle in 1996.
Mr. Fowler, 55, has been Executive Vice President, Systems since February 2010. Prior to Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems, Inc., Mr. Fowler served as Sun’s Executive Vice President, Systems Group from May 2006 to February 2010, as Executive Vice President, Network Systems Group from May 2004 to May 2006 and as Chief Technology Officer, Software Group from July 2002 to May 2004.
Ms. Daley, 54,57, has been our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since April 2015 and was our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary sincefrom October 2007.2007 to April 2015. She served as our Vice President, Legal, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from June 2004 to October 2007, as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from October 2001 to June 2004 and as Associate General Counsel from February 2001 to October 2001. She held various other positions with us since joining Oracle’s Legal Department in 1992.
Mr. West, 51,54, has been our Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since April 2015. He served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer sincefrom February 2008 to April 2015 and wasserved as our Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from April 2007 to February 2008. His previous experience includes 14 years with Arthur Andersen LLP, most recently as a partner.
We operate in rapidly changing economic and technological environments that present numerous risks, many of which are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict. The following discussion, as well as our “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”
discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7), highlights some of these risks. The risks described below are not exhaustive and you should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties before investing in our securities.
Economic, politicalOur Oracle Cloud strategy, including our Oracle Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and market conditions canData as a Service (DaaS) offerings, may adversely affect our revenues and profitability. We offer customers a full range of consumption models, including the deployment of our products via our cloud-based SaaS, PaaS, IaaS and DaaS offerings. These business resultsmodels continue to evolve, and we may not be able to compete effectively, generate significant revenues or maintain the profitability of operationsour cloud offerings. Additionally, the increasing prevalence of cloud and financial condition, includingSaaS delivery models offered by us and our revenue growthcompetitors may unfavorably impact the pricing of our on-premise enterprise software offerings and our cloud offerings, and has a dampening impact on overall demand for our on-premise software product and service offerings, which has reduced and could continue to reduce our revenues and profitability, whichat least in turnthe near term. If we do not successfully execute our cloud computing strategy or anticipate the cloud computing needs of our customers, our reputation as a cloud services provider could be harmed and our revenues and profitability could decline.
As customer demand for our cloud offerings increases, we experience volatility in our reported revenues and operating results due to the differences in timing of revenue recognition between our new software licenses and hardware arrangements relative to our cloud offering arrangements. Customers generally purchase our cloud offerings on a subscription basis and revenues from these offerings are generally recognized ratably over the terms of the subscriptions. The deferred revenue that results from sales of our cloud offerings may prevent any deterioration in sales activity associated with our cloud offerings from becoming immediately observable in our consolidated statement of operations. This is in contrast to revenues associated with our new software licenses arrangements whereby new software licenses revenues are generally recognized in full at the time of delivery of
the related software licenses. We incur certain expenses associated with the infrastructures and marketing of our cloud offerings in advance of our ability to recognize the revenues associated with these offerings.
We have also acquired a number of cloud computing companies, and the integration of these companies into our Oracle Cloud strategy may not be as efficient or scalable as anticipated, which could adversely affect our stock price.ability to fully realize the benefits anticipated from these acquisitions.
Our success depends upon our ability to develop new products and services, integrate acquired products and services and enhance our existing products and services. Rapid technological advances, changing delivery models and evolving standards in computer hardware and software development and communications infrastructure, changing and increasingly sophisticated customer needs and frequent new product introductions and enhancements characterize the industries in which we compete. If we are unable to develop new or sufficiently differentiated products and services, enhance and improve our product offerings and support services in a timely manner or position and price our products and services to meet demand, customers may not purchase or subscribe to our software, hardware or cloud offerings or renew software support, hardware support or cloud subscriptions contracts. Renewals of these contracts are important to the growth of our business. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that the standards on which we choose to develop new products will allow us to compete effectively for business opportunities in emerging areas.
We have continued to refresh and release new offerings of our cloud and on-premise software and hardware products and services, including our Database Multitenant, Database In-Memory, SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, DaaS and Oracle Engineered Systems offerings. Our business is influenced by a range of factors that are beyond our control and that we have no comparative advantage in forecasting. These include:may be adversely affected if:
general economicwe do not continue to develop and business conditions;release these or other new or enhanced products and services within the anticipated time frames;
the overall demand for enterprise software, hardware systems and services;there is a delay in market acceptance of a new, enhanced or acquired product line or service;
governmental budgetary constraintsthere are changes in information technology (IT) trends that we do not adequately anticipate or shifts in government spending priorities;address with our product development efforts;
general political developments;we do not timely optimize complementary product lines and services; or
currency exchange rate fluctuations.we fail to adequately integrate, support or enhance acquired product lines or services.
Macroeconomic developments likeIf our security measures for our products and services are compromised and as a result, our data, our customers’ data or our IT systems are accessed improperly, made unavailable, or improperly modified, our products and services may be perceived as vulnerable, our brand and reputation could be damaged, the ongoing economic crisisIT services we provide to our customers could be disrupted, and customers may stop using our products and services, all of which could reduce our revenue and earnings, increase our expenses and expose us to legal claims and regulatory actions. We are in the European Union, the continued slow pace of economic recovery in the United StatesIT business, and slowing economic conditions in parts of Asiaour products and South America could negatively affectservices, including our business, operating results or financial condition which, in turn, could adversely affectOracle Cloud offerings, store, retrieve, manipulate and manage our stock price. In addition, there is significant focus in the United States on the overall reduction in government spending at the federal level knowncustomers’ information and data, external data, as “sequestration” that has recently gone into effect. A general weakening of,well as our own data. We have a reputation for secure and reliable product offerings and related declining corporate confidenceservices and we have invested a great deal of time and resources in protecting the global economyintegrity and security of our products, services and the internal and external data that we manage.
At times, we encounter attempts by third parties to identify and exploit product and service vulnerabilities, penetrate or bypass our security measures, and gain unauthorized access to our or our customers’, partners’ and suppliers’ software, hardware and cloud offerings, networks and systems, any of which could lead to the compromise of personal information or the curtailment in governmentconfidential information or corporate spendingdata of Oracle or our customers. Computer hackers and others may be able to develop and deploy IT related viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that could cause current orattack our products and services, exploit potential customers to reduce their information technology (IT) budgets or be unable to fund software, hardware systems or services purchases, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchasessecurity vulnerabilities of our products and services, create system disruptions and cause shutdowns or causedenials of service. This is also true for third-party data, products or services incorporated into our own. Data may also be accessed or modified improperly as a result of customer, partner, employee or supplier error or malfeasance and third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce customers, partners, employees or suppliers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information in order to gain access to our data, our customers’, suppliers’ or partners’ data or the IT systems of Oracle, its customers, suppliers or partners.
High-profile security breaches at other companies have increased in recent years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned about the risks of hackers and cyber-attacks targeting IT products and businesses. Although this is an industry-wide problem that affects other software and hardware companies, it affects Oracle in particular because computer hackers tend to focus their efforts on the most prominent IT companies, and they may focus on Oracle because of our reputation for, and marketing efforts associated with, having secure products and services. These risks will increase as we continue to grow our cloud offerings and store and process increasingly large amounts of data, including personal information and our customers’ confidential information and data and other external data, and host or manage parts of our customers’ businesses in cloud-based IT environments, especially in customer sectors involving particularly sensitive data such as health sciences, financial services and the government. We also have an active acquisition program and have acquired a number of companies, products, services and technologies over the years. While we make significant efforts to address any IT security issues with respect to our acquired companies, we may still inherit such risks when we integrate these companies within Oracle.
We could suffer significant damage to our brand and reputation if a cyber-attack or other security incident were to allow unauthorized access to or modification of our customers’ or suppliers’ data, other external data, or our own data or our IT systems or if the services we provide to our customers were disrupted, or if our products or services are perceived as having security vulnerabilities. Customers could lose confidence in the security and reliability of our products and services, including our cloud offerings, and perceive them to be not secure. This could lead to payfewer customers using our products and services and result in reduced revenue and earnings. The costs we would incur to address and fix these security incidents would increase our expenses. These types of security incidents could also lead to lawsuits, regulatory investigations and claims and increased legal liability, including in some cases contractual costs related to customer notification and fraud monitoring.
Our business practices with respect to the collection, use and management of personal information could give rise to operational interruption, liabilities or reputational harm as a result of governmental regulation, legal requirements or industry standards relating to consumer privacy and data protection. As regulatory focus on privacy issues continues to increase and worldwide laws and regulations concerning the handling of personal information expand and become more complex, potential risks related to data collection and use within our business will intensify. For example, in October 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) invalidated the EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Framework, which Oracle as well as many other global enterprises had relied on in certain contexts to enable the transfer of EU personal data to the United States. While Oracle adapted to this judgment by implementing other transfer mechanisms permitted under applicable law, the validity of these other mechanisms could also be challenged. If successful, this could require Oracle to make disruptive operational adjustments to the delivery of certain services that could impact customers and sales in the region. In addition, U.S. and foreign governments have enacted or are considering enacting legislation or regulations, or may in the near future interpret existing legislation or regulations, in a manner that could significantly impact the ability of Oracle and our customers and data partners to collect, augment, analyze, use, transfer and share personal and other information that is integral to certain services Oracle provides and data services. This could be true particularly in those jurisdictions where privacy laws or regulators take a broader view of how personal information is defined, therefore subjecting the handling of such data to heightened restrictions that may be obstructive to the operations of Oracle and its customers and data providers. This impact may be acute in countries that have passed or are considering passing legislation that requires data to remain localized “in country,” as this imposes financial costs on any service provider that is required to store data in jurisdictions not of its choosing and nonstandard operational processes that are difficult and costly to integrate with global processes.
Regulators globally are also imposing greater monetary fines for privacy violations, and the EU is considering legislation that would impose fines for privacy violations based on a percentage of global revenues. Changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data, such as healthcare data or other personal information, could greatly increase our cost of providing our products and services or even prevent us from offering certain of our services in jurisdictions that we operate. Additionally, public perception and standards related to the privacy of personal information can shift rapidly, in ways that may affect Oracle’s reputation or influence regulators to enact regulations and laws that may limit Oracle’s ability to provide certain
products. Any failure, or perceived failure, by Oracle to comply with U.S. federal, state, or foreign laws and regulations, including laws and regulations regulating privacy, data security, or consumer protection, or other policies, public perception, standards, self-regulatory requirements or legal obligations, could result in lost or restricted business, proceedings, actions or fines brought against us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services.
In addition, political unrest in regions like the Middle East, terrorist attacks around the globe and the potential for other hostilities in various parts of the world, potential public health crises and natural disasters continue to contribute to a climate of economic and political uncertainty thatlevied by governmental entities or others, or could adversely affect our resultsbusiness and harm our reputation.
We might experience significant coding, manufacturing or configuration errors in our software, hardware and cloud offerings. Despite testing prior to the release and throughout the lifecycle of a product or service, our software, hardware and cloud offerings sometimes contain coding or manufacturing errors that can impact their function, performance and security, and result in other negative consequences. The detection and correction of any errors in released software, hardware or cloud offerings can be time consuming and costly. Errors in our software, hardware or cloud offerings could affect their ability to properly function or operate with other software, hardware or cloud offerings, could delay the development or release of new products or services or new versions of products or services, could create security vulnerabilities in our products or services, and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products or services. This includes third-party software products or services incorporated into our own. If we experience errors or delays in releasing our software, hardware or cloud offerings or new versions thereof, our sales could be affected and revenues could decline. In addition, we run Oracle’s business operations as well as cloud and other services that we offer to our customers on our products and networks. Therefore, any flaws could affect our ability to conduct our business operations and financial condition, includingthe operations of our revenue growth and profitability. These factors generally have the strongest effectcustomers. Enterprise customers rely on our sales of new software, licenses, hardware systems products,and cloud offerings and services to run their businesses and errors in our software, hardware systems supportor cloud offerings could expose us to product liability, performance and related serviceswarranty claims as well as significant harm to our brand and to a lesser extent, also may affectreputation, which could impact our renewal rates for software license updates and product support.future sales.
We may fail to achieve our financial forecasts due to inaccurate sales forecasts or other factors. Our revenues, and particularly our new software licenses revenues and hardware systems products revenues, are difficult to forecast, and, asforecast. As a result, our quarterly operating results can fluctuate substantially. Our limited experience with managing our hardware business and forecasting its future financial results creates additional challenges with our forecasting processes.
We use a “pipeline” system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our business. Our sales personnel monitor the status of all proposals and estimate when a customer will make a purchase decision and the dollar amount of the sale. These estimates are aggregated periodically to generate a sales pipeline. Our pipeline estimates can prove to be unreliable both in a particular quarter and over a longer period of time, in part because the “conversion rate” or “closure rate” of the pipeline into contracts can be very difficult to estimate. A reduction in the conversion rate, or in the pipeline itself, could cause us to plan or budget incorrectly and adversely affect our business or results of operations. In particular, a slowdown in IT spending or economic conditions generally can unexpectedly reduce the conversion rate in particular periods as purchasing decisions are delayed, reduced in amount or cancelled. The conversion rate can also be affected by the tendency of some of our customers to wait until the end of a fiscal period in the hope of obtaining more favorable terms, which can also impede our ability to negotiate, execute and deliver upon these contracts in a timely manner. In addition, for newly acquired companies, we have limited ability to predict how their pipelines will convert into sales or revenues for a number of quarters following the acquisition. Conversion rates post-acquisition may be quite different from the acquired companies’ historical conversion rates. Differences in conversion rates can also be affected by changes in our business practices that we implement within our newly acquired companies thatcompanies. These changes may negatively affect customer behavior.
A substantial portion of our new software licenses revenue contracts and hardware systems products contracts is completed in the latter part of a quarter and a significant percentage of these are larger orders. Because a significant portion of our cost structure is largely fixed in the short-term,short term, sales and revenue shortfalls tend to have a disproportionately negative impact on our profitability. The
number of large new software licenses transactions and, to a lesser extent, hardware systems products transactions increases the risk of fluctuations in our quarterly results because a delay in even a small number of these transactions could cause our quarterly sales, revenues and profitability to fall significantly short of our predictions.
Our hardware systemsWe may experience foreign currency gains and losses. Changes in currency exchange rates can adversely affect customer demand and our revenue and profitability. We conduct a significant number of transactions and hold cash in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Changes in the values of major foreign currencies,
particularly the Euro, Japanese Yen and British Pound, relative to the U.S. Dollar can significantly affect our total assets, revenues, operating results and cash flows, which are reported in U.S. Dollars. In particular, the economic uncertainties relating to European sovereign and other debt obligations may cause the value of the Euro to fluctuate relative to the U.S. Dollar. Fluctuations in foreign currency rates, most notably the recent strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro and most other major international currencies, adversely affects our revenue growth in terms of the amounts that we report in U.S. Dollars after converting our foreign currency results into U.S. Dollars and in terms of actual demand for our products and services as these products become relatively more expensive for foreign currency-based enterprises to purchase. In addition, currency variations can adversely affect margins on sales of our products in countries outside of the United States. Generally, our revenues and profitability could decline further ifoperating results are adversely affected when the dollar strengthens relative to other currencies and are positively affected when the dollar weakens. In addition, our reported assets generally are adversely affected when the dollar strengthens relative to other currencies as a significant portion of our consolidated cash and bank deposits, among other assets, are held in foreign currencies. The U.S. Dollar generally strengthened relative to other currencies, including the Euro, in fiscal 2016, which is reflected in our results.
In addition, we do not manageincur foreign currency transaction gains and losses, primarily related to sublicense fees and other intercompany agreements among us and our subsidiaries that we expect to cash settle in the near term, which are charged against earnings in the period incurred. We have a program which primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts designed to offset the risks associated with our hardware systems business. Our hardware systems business may adversely affect our overall profitability if we do not effectively manage the associated risks.certain foreign currency exposures. We may not achievesuspend the program from time to time. As a part of this program, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts so that increases or decreases in our estimated revenue, profitforeign currency exposures are offset at least in part by gains or other financial projectionslosses on the foreign currency forward contracts in an effort to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with our foreign currency transaction gains or losses. A large portion of our consolidated operations are international, and we expect that we will continue to realize gains or losses with respect to our hardware systems businessforeign currency exposures, net of gains or losses from our foreign currency forward contracts. For example, we will experience foreign currency gains and losses in a timely mannercertain instances if it is not possible or at all duecost-effective to a numberhedge our foreign currency exposures, if our hedging efforts are ineffective, or should we suspend our foreign currency forward contract program. Our ultimate realized loss or gain with respect to currency fluctuations will generally depend on the size and type of cross-currency exposures that we enter into, the currency exchange rates associated with these exposures and changes in those rates, whether we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to offset these exposures and other factors. All of these factors including:could materially impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
as we develop and introduce new versions or next generationsCertain of our hardware systems products, customersinternational subsidiaries operate in economies that have been designated as highly inflationary. We have incurred foreign currency losses associated with the devaluation of currencies in these highly inflationary economies relative to the U.S. Dollar and we may defercontinue to incur such losses in these countries or delay purchasesother emerging market countries where we do business.
Economic, political and market conditions can adversely affect our business, results of existing hardware systems productsoperations and wait for these new releases, all offinancial condition, including our revenue growth and profitability, which in turn could adversely affect our hardware systems revenuesstock price. Our business is influenced by a range of factors that are beyond our control and that we have no comparative advantage in the short term;forecasting. These include:
general economic and business conditions;
ouroverall demand for enterprise software, cloud offerings, hardware systems business has higher expenses as a percentage of revenues, and thus has been less profitable, than our software business. We have reported lower overall operating margins as a percentage of revenues in the past and we may report lower operating margins as a percentage of revenues in the future;services;
our focus on our more profitable Oracle Engineered Systems, such as our Oracle Exadata Database Machine, Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud and Oracle SPARC SuperCluster products, which aregovernmental budgetary constraints or shifts in the relatively early stages of adoption by our customers, and our de-emphasis on our lower profit margin commodity hardware systems products that historically constituted a larger portion of our hardware systems revenues;
the unplanned departures of some important employees could adversely impact our ability to run successfully our hardware systems business, which could adversely impact our ability to realize the forecasts for our hardware systems business and its results of operations;
we face a greater risk of potential write-downs and impairments of inventory, higher warranty expenses than we had historically encountered in our existing software and services businesses, higher amortization from intangible assets, and potential impairment of intangible assets and goodwill associated with our hardware systems business. Any of these items could result in material charges and adversely affect our operating results;
we may not be able to increase sales of hardware systems support contracts or such increase may take longer than we anticipate, which could result in lower revenues and profitability, or slower than expected growth of such revenues and profitability;government spending priorities; and
we may forgo sales opportunities,general political developments.
Macroeconomic developments like the continued slow pace of economic recovery in Europe and parts of the United States, Asia and South America could negatively affect our business, operating results, financial condition and outlook, which, in turn, could adversely affect our stock price. Any general weakening of, and related declining corporate confidence in, the global economy or the curtailment of government or corporate spending could cause current or potential customers to reduce or eliminate their IT budgets and revenues as a resultspending, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our reducing the resale of third party products and services or cause customers not to pay us or to delay paying us for which Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Sun) historically acted as a reseller.
Our periodic workforce restructurings, including reorganizations of our sales force, can be disruptive. We have in the past restructured or made other adjustments to our workforce, including our direct sales force on which we rely heavily, in response to management changes, product changes, performance issues, acquisitions and other internal and external considerations. For example, in fiscal 2013, we hired a significant number of new people to our direct sales force and reorganized the various sales teams so that they increased their focus on specificpreviously purchased products and services and became more specialized. In the past, these types of sales force restructurings have resulted in temporary reduced productivity while the sales teams adjusted to their new roles and responsibilities. services.
In addition, we may not achieve or sustainpolitical unrest in places like Ukraine, Syria and Iraq and the expected growth or cost savings benefitsrelated potential impact on global stability, terrorist attacks and the potential for other hostilities in various parts of these restructurings, or do so within the expected timeframe. These effectsworld, potential public health crises and natural disasters continue to contribute to a climate of economic and political uncertainty that could recur in connection with future acquisitions and other restructurings andadversely affect our revenues and other results of operations could be negatively affected.
Our strategy of transitioning to a mixed direct and indirect sales model forfinancial condition, including our hardware systems products may not succeedrevenue growth and could result in lower hardware revenues or profits. Disruptions toprofitability. These factors generally have the strongest effect on our software indirect sales channel could affect our future operating results. Although we will continue to sell our hardware systems products through indirect channels, including independent distributors and value added resellers, we have enhanced our direct sales coverage for our hardware products and intend that our direct sales force will sell a larger portion of our hardware products in the future than they do now. These direct sales efforts, however, may not be successful. Our relationships with some of our channel partners may deteriorate because we have reduced our reliance on some of these partners for sales of our hardware products and have modified our approach and timing to the manufacturing of our products, which could result in reduced demand from the channel partners or certain customer segments serviced by these channel partners. Some hardware revenues from channel partners may not be replaced by revenues generated from our own sales personnel or may not be replaced as quickly as we
expect. In addition, these newly hired salespeople may not be able to achieve our sales forecasts for our hardware business. If we experience any of these risks, our hardware revenues and profits may decline.
Our software indirect channel network is comprised primarily of resellers, system integrators/implementers, consultants, education providers, internet service providers, network integrators and independent software vendors. Our relationships with these channel participants are important elements of our software marketing and sales efforts. Our financial results could be adversely affected if our contracts with channel participants were terminated, if our relationships with channel participants were to deteriorate, if any of our competitors enter into strategic relationships with or acquire a significant channel participant, if the financial condition or operations of our channel participants were to weaken or if the level of demand for our channel participants’ products and services were to decrease. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining, expanding or developing our relationships with channel participants. If we are not successful, we may lose sales opportunities, customers and revenues.
Our cloud computing strategy, including our Oracle Cloud and Oracle managed cloud services offerings, may not be successful. We offer customers a broad portfolio of software and hardware products and services to enable customers to adopt a cloud computing strategy that is right for them. Oracle Cloud is a comprehensive set of cloud service offerings that is designed to provide customers and partners with access to application services, social networking services, platform services and common infrastructure services on a subscription basis and managed, hosted and supported by Oracle. Oracle managed cloud services include software and hardware management and maintenance services hosted at our data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities. These business models continue to evolve, and we may not be able to compete effectively, generate significant revenues or maintain their profitability. We have acquired other cloud computing companies and incur expenses associated with the infrastructures and marketing of our managed cloud services and cloud software subscriptions offerings in advance of our ability to recognize the revenues associated with these offerings. Demand for our cloud offerings may unfavorably impact demand for certain of our other products and services, including new software licenses, hardware products, hardware support and related services and, to a lesser extent, also may affect our renewal rates for software license updates and product support services.
If our data protection or other security measures are compromised and as a result our data, our customers’ data or our IT systems are accessed improperly, made unavailable, or improperly modified, our products and services may be perceived as vulnerable, our brand and reputation could be damaged, the IT services we provide to our customers could be disrupted, and customers may stop using our products and services, all of which could reduce our revenue and earnings, increase our expenses and expose us to legal claims and regulatory actions. We are in the information technology business, and our products and services store, retrieve, manipulate and manage our customers’ information and data as well as our own. We have a reputation for secure and reliable software and hardware products and services and have invested a great deal of time and resources in protecting the integrity and security of our products, services and internal and external data that we manage.
Nevertheless, we encounter attempts by third parties to penetrate or bypass our data protection and other security measures and gain unauthorized access to our networks, systems and data or compromise the confidential information or data of our customers. Computer hackers and others may be able to develop and deploy IT related viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that could attack our products and services, exploit potential security vulnerabilities of our products and services, create system disruptions and cause shutdowns or denials of service. Data may also be accessed or modified improperly as a result of employee or supplier error or malfeasance and third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information in order to gain access to our data, our customers’ data or our IT systems.
Although this is an industry-wide problem that affects other software and hardware companies, it affects Oracle in particular because computer hackers tend to focus their efforts on the most popular or well-known IT companies, and they may focus on Oracle because of our reputation for, and marketing efforts associated with, having secure products and services. These risks for us will increase as we continue to grow oursubscription-based cloud offerings and services and store and process increasingly large amounts of our customers’ confidential information and data and host or manage parts of our customers’ businesses in cloud-based IT environments, especially in customer sectors involving particularly sensitive data such as health sciences, financial services and the government. We also have an active acquisition program and have acquired a number of companies, products, services and technologies over the years. While we make significant efforts to address any IT security issues with respect to our acquisitions, we may still inherit such risks when we integrate these acquisitions within Oracle.
If a cyber attack or other security incident described above were to allow unauthorized access to or modification of our customers’ data or our own data or our IT systems or if the services we provide to our customers were disrupted, or if our products or services are perceived as having security vulnerabilities, we could suffer damage to our brand and reputation. Customers could lose
confidence in the security and reliability of our products and services and perceive them to be not secure. This in turn could lead to fewer customers using our products and services and result in reduced revenue and earnings. The costs we would incur to address and fix these security incidents would increase our expenses. These types of security incidents could also lead to lawsuits, regulatory investigations and claims and increased legal liability, including in some cases contractual costs related to customer notification and fraud monitoring.
Further, as regulatory focus on privacy issues continues to increase and worldwide laws and regulations concerning the protection of personal information expand and become more complex, these potential risks to our business will intensify. Changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data, such as healthcare data or other personally identifiable information, could greatly increase our cost of providing our products and services.
Our success depends upon our ability to develop new products and services, integrate acquired products and services and enhance our existing products and services. Rapid technological advances and evolving standards in computer hardware and software development and communications infrastructure, changing and increasingly sophisticated customer needs and frequent new product introductions and enhancements characterize the enterprise software and hardware systems industries in which we compete. If we are unable to develop new or sufficiently differentiated products and services, or enhance and improve our products and support services in a timely manner or to position and/or price our products and services to meet demand, customers may not buy new software licenses, cloud software subscriptions or hardware systems products or purchase or renew software license updates and product support or hardware systems support contracts. Renewals of these support contracts are important to the growth of our business. In addition, IT standards from both consortia and formal standards-setting forums as well as de facto marketplace standards are rapidly evolving. We cannot provide any assurance that the standards on which we choose to develop new products will allow us to compete effectively for business opportunities in emerging areas.
We have continued to refresh and release new offerings of our software and hardware products and services, including our Oracle Cloud and Oracle Engineered Systems offerings. If we do not continue to develop and release these or other new or enhanced products and services within the anticipated time frames, if there is a delay in market acceptance of a new, enhanced or acquired product line or service, if there are changes in information technology trends for which we do not adequately anticipate or react our product development efforts toward, if we do not timely optimize complementary product lines and services or if we fail to adequately integrate, support or enhance acquired product lines or services, our business may be adversely affected.
If we are unable to compete effectively, with existing or new hardware systems or software competitors, the results of operations and prospects for our business could be harmed through fewer customer orders, reduced pricing, lower revenuesharmed. We face intense competition in all aspects of our business. The nature of the IT industry creates a competitive landscape that is constantly evolving as firms emerge, expand or lower profits. are acquired, as technology evolves and as delivery models change. Many vendors develop and market databases, middleware products, application development tools, business applications, collaboration products and business intelligence products, among others, that compete with our cloud and on-premise software offerings. These vendors include on-premise software companies and companies that offer cloud-based SaaS, PaaS, IaaS and DaaS offerings and business process outsourcing (BPO) as competitive alternatives to buying software and hardware. Our competitors that offer business applications and middleware products may influence a customer’s purchasing decision for the underlying database in an effort to persuade potential customers not to acquire our products. We could lose customers if our competitors introduce new competitive products, add new functionality, acquire competitive products, reduce prices, better execute on their sales and marketing strategies or form strategic alliances with other companies. We may also face increasing competition from open source software initiatives in which competitors may provide software and intellectual property for free. Existing or new competitors could gain sales opportunities or customers at our expense.
Our hardware systems business will competecompetes with, among others, (i)(1) systems manufacturers and resellers of systems based on our own microprocessors and operating systems and those of our competitors, (ii)(2) microprocessor/chip manufacturers, and (iii)(3) providers of storage products.products, (4) certain industry-specific hardware manufacturers including those serving communications, hospitality and retail industries and (5) certain cloud providers that build their own IT infrastructure. Our hardware systems business may also causecauses us to compete with certain companies whothat historically have been our partners. Some of these competitors may have more experience than we do in managing a hardware business. A large portion of our hardware products are based on our SPARC microprocessor and Oracle Solaris operating system platform, which has a smaller installed base than certain of our competitors’ platforms and which may make it difficult for us to win new customers that have already made significant investments in our competitors’ platforms. Certain of these competitors also compete very aggressively on price. A loss in our competitive position could result in lower revenues or profitability, which could adversely impact our ability to realize the revenue and profitability forecasts for our hardware systems business.
Many vendors develop and market databases, middleware products, application development tools, business applications, collaborationWe may need to change our pricing models to compete successfully. The intense competition we face in the sales of our products and business intelligence products, amongst others, that compete with our software offerings. In addition, several companies offer software-as-a-service (SaaS) or cloud computingservices and general economic and business process outsourcing (BPO) as competitive alternativesconditions can put pressure on us to buying software and hardware, and customer interest in cloud or SaaS solutions is increasing. Our competitors that offer business applications and middleware products may influence a customer’s purchasing decision for the underlying database in an effort to persuade potential customers not to acquirechange our products. We could lose customers ifprices. If our competitors introduce new competitiveoffer deep discounts on certain products add new functionality, acquire competitiveor services or develop products reducethat the marketplace considers more valuable, we may need to lower prices or form strategic alliances withoffer other companies. Vendors that offer SaaS, cloud or BPO solutionsfavorable terms in order to compete successfully. Any such changes may persuade our customers not to purchase our on-premise products. We may also face increasing competition from open source software initiatives in which competitors may provide softwarereduce margins and intellectual property for free. Existing or new competitors could gain sales opportunities or customers at our expense.
Acquisitions present many risks and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals that were contemplated at the time of a transaction. In recent years, we have invested billions of dollars to acquire a number of companies, products, services and technologies. An active acquisition program is an important element of our overall corporate strategy and we expect to continue to make acquisitions in the future. Risks we may face in connection with our acquisition program include:
our ongoing business may be disrupted and our management’s attention may be diverted by acquisition, transition or integration activities;
an acquisition may not further our business strategy as we expected, we may not integrate an acquired company or technology as successfully as we expected or we may overpay for, or otherwise not realize the expected return on, our investments, which could adversely affect our business or operating resultsresults. Additionally, the increasing prevalence of cloud and potentially cause impairment to assets that we recorded as a part of an acquisition including intangible assetsSaaS delivery models offered by us and goodwill;
we may have difficulties (i) managing an acquired company’s technologies or lines of business or (ii) entering new markets where we have no or limited direct prior experience or whereour competitors may have stronger market positions;
unfavorably impact the pricing of our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by claims or liabilities that we assume from an acquired company or technology or that are otherwise related to an acquisition, including claims from government agencies, terminated employees, current or former customers, former stockholders or other third parties; pre-existing contractual relationships of an acquired company that we would not have otherwise entered into, the termination or modification of which may be costly or disruptive toon-premise enterprise software offerings and our business; unfavorable revenue recognition or other accounting treatmentcloud offerings, as a result of an acquired company’s practices;well as overall demand for our on-premise software product and intellectual property claims or disputes;
we may fail to identify or assess the magnitude of certain liabilities, shortcomings or other circumstances prior to acquiring a company or technology,service offerings, which could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting treatment, unexpected increases in taxes due, a loss of anticipated tax benefits or other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition;
we may not realize the anticipated increase inreduce our revenues from an acquisition for a number of reasons, including if a larger than predicted number of customers decline to renewand profitability. Our software license updates and product support contracts,fees and hardware systems support contractsfees are generally priced as a percentage of our net new software licenses fees and cloud subscription contracts, if we are unablenet new hardware products fees, respectively. Our competitors may offer lower pricing on their support offerings, which could put pressure on us to sell the acquired productsfurther discount our offerings or support pricing.
Any broad-based change to our customer baseprices and pricing policies could cause our revenues to decline or if contract modelsbe delayed as our sales force implements and our customers adjust to the new pricing policies. Some of an acquired companyour competitors may bundle products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy or provide guarantees of prices and product implementations. These practices could, over time, significantly constrain the prices that we can charge for certain of our products. If we do not allowadapt our pricing models to reflect changes in customer use of our
products or changes in customer demand, our revenues could decrease. The increase in open source software distribution may also cause us to recognize revenues on a timely basis;
we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies, products, services and their related supply chain operations withchange our existing lines of business and supply chain infrastructure and maintaining uniform standards, architecture, controls, procedures and policies;
we may have multiple product lines as a result of our acquisitions that are offered, priced and supported differently, which could cause customer confusion and delays;
we may have higher than anticipated costs in continuing support and development of acquired products, in general and administrative functions that support new business models, or in compliance with associated regulations that are more complicated than we had anticipated;
we may be unable to obtain timely approvals from, or may otherwise have certain limitations, restrictions, penalties or other sanctions imposed on us by, worker councils or similar bodies under applicable employment laws as a result of an acquisition, which could adversely affect our integration plans in certain jurisdictions and potentially increase our integration and restructuring expenses;
we may be unable to obtain required approvals from governmental authorities under competition and antitrust laws on a timely basis, if at all, which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of an acquisition or have other adverse effects on our current business and operations;
our use of cash to pay for acquisitions may limit other potential uses of our cash, including stock repurchases, dividend payments and retirement of outstanding indebtedness;
we may significantly increase our interest expense, leverage and debt service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an acquisition and we may have to delay or not proceed with a substantial acquisition if we cannot obtain the necessary funding to complete the acquisition in a timely manner or on favorable terms;
to the extent that we issue a significant amount of equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease; and
we may experience additional or unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our acquisitions pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including arrangements that we assume from an acquisition.
The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or several concurrent acquisitions.pricing models.
Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results. We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from, and have significant operations, outside of the United States. Our international operations include software and hardware systems development, manufacturing, assembly, cloud operations, sales, customer support, consulting managed cloudand other services and shared administrative service centers.
Compliance with international and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in foreign jurisdictions. These laws and regulations include U.S. laws and local laws which include data privacy requirements, labor relations laws, tax laws, anti-competition regulations, prohibitions on payments to governmental officials, import and trade restrictions and export requirements. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could result in prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, could delay or prevent potential acquisitions and could also materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business and our operating results. Compliance with these laws requires a significant amount of management attention and effort, which may divert management’s attention from running our business operations and could harm our ability to grow our business, or may increase our expenses as we engage specialized or other additional resources to assist us with our compliance efforts. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate these risks and manage these difficulties. We monitor our operations and investigate allegations of improprieties relating to transactions and the way in which such transactions are recorded. Where circumstances warrant, we provide information and report our findings to government authorities, but no assurance can be given that action will not be taken by such authorities.
We are also subject to a variety of other risks and challenges in managing an organization operating in various countries, including those related to:
general economic conditions in each country or region;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and related impacts to customer demand and our operating results;
natural disasters;difficulties in transferring funds from or converting currencies in certain countries such as Venezuela that have led to a devaluation of our net assets, in particular our cash assets, in that country’s currency;
regulatory changes, including government austerity measures in certain countries that we may not be able to sufficiently plan for or avoid that may unexpectedly impair bank deposits or other cash assets that we hold in these countries or that impose additional taxes that we may be required to pay in these countries;
political unrest, terrorism and the potential for other hostilities;hostilities, including those in Ukraine, Syria, and Iraq;
common local business behaviors that are in direct conflict with our business ethics, practices and conduct policies;
natural disasters;
the effects of climate change (such as sea level rise, drought, flooding, wildfires and increased storm sensitivity);
longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
overlapping tax regimes;
our ability to repatriate funds held by our foreign subsidiaries to the United States at favorable tax rates;
difficulties in transferring funds from or converting currencies in certain countries such as Venezuela that have led to a devaluation of our net assets, in particular our cash assets, in that country’s currency;
public health risks, particularly in areas in which we have significant operations; and
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries.
As a result of our hardware systems business, the number and complexity of laws and regulations that we are subject to have increased.
The variety of risks and challenges listed above could also disrupt or otherwise negatively impact the supply chain operations for our hardware systems products segment and the sales of our products and services in affected countries or regions.
As the majority shareholder of Oracle Financial Services Software Limited (OFSS), a publicly traded Indian software company focused on the banking industry,in India, and Oracle Corporation Japan (NOKK), a publicly traded company in Japan, we are faced with several additional risks, including being subject to local securities regulations and being unable to exert full control.
Acquisitions present many risks and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals that were contemplated at the time of a transaction. We continue to invest billions of dollars to acquire companies, products, services and technologies. We have a selective and active acquisition program and we expect to continue to make acquisitions in the future because acquisitions are an important element of our overall corporate strategy. Risks we may face in connection with our acquisition program include:
our ongoing business may be disrupted and our management’s attention may be diverted by acquisition, transition or integration activities;
we may have difficulties (1) managing an acquired company’s technologies or lines of business; (2) entering new markets where we have no or limited direct prior experience or where competitors may have stronger market positions; or (3) retaining key personnel from the acquired companies;
an acquisition may not further our business strategy as we expected, we may not integrate an acquired company or technology as successfully as we expected, we may impose our business practices or alter go-to-market strategies that adversely impact the acquired business or we may overpay for, or otherwise not realize the expected return on, our investments, which could adversely affect our business or operating results and potentially cause impairment to assets that we recorded as a part of an acquisition including intangible assets and goodwill;
our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by claims or liabilities that we assume from an acquired company or technology or that are otherwise related to an acquisition, including, among others, claims from government agencies, terminated employees, current or former customers, former stockholders or other third parties; pre-existing contractual relationships of an acquired company that we would not have otherwise entered into, the termination or modification of which may be costly or disruptive to our business; unfavorable revenue recognition or other accounting treatment as a result of an acquired company’s practices; and intellectual property claims or disputes;
we may fail to identify or assess the magnitude of certain liabilities, shortcomings or other circumstances prior to acquiring a company or technology, which could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting treatment, unexpected increases in taxes due, a loss of anticipated tax benefits or other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition;
we may not realize the anticipated increase in our revenues from an acquisition for a number of reasons, including if a larger than predicted number of customers decline to renew software or hardware support contracts or cloud-based subscription contracts, if we are unable to sell the acquired products or service offerings to our customer base or if contract models of an acquired company do not allow us to recognize revenues on a timely basis;
we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies, products, services and their related supply chain operations with our existing lines of business and supply chain infrastructure and maintaining uniform standards, architecture, controls, procedures and policies;
we may have multiple product lines or services offerings as a result of our acquisitions that are offered, priced and supported differently, which could cause customer confusion and delays;
we may have higher than anticipated costs in continuing support and development of acquired products or services, in general and administrative functions that support new business models, or in compliance with associated regulations that are more complicated than we had anticipated;
we may be unable to obtain timely approvals from, or may otherwise have certain limitations, restrictions, penalties or other sanctions imposed on us by, worker councils or similar bodies under applicable employment laws as a result of an acquisition, which could adversely affect our integration plans in certain jurisdictions and potentially increase our integration and restructuring expenses;
we may be unable to obtain required approvals from governmental authorities under competition and antitrust laws on a timely basis, if at all, which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of an acquisition or have other adverse effects on our current business and operations;
our use of cash to pay for acquisitions may limit other potential uses of our cash, including stock repurchases, dividend payments and retirement of outstanding indebtedness;
we may significantly increase our interest expense, leverage and debt service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an acquisition and we may have to delay or not proceed with a substantial acquisition if we cannot obtain the necessary funding to complete the acquisition in a timely manner or on favorable terms;
to the extent that we issue a significant amount of equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease; and
we may experience additional or unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our acquisitions pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including arrangements that we assume from an acquisition.
The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition or several concurrent acquisitions.
Our hardware systemsrevenues and profitability could decline if we do not manage the risks associated with our hardware business. Our hardware business may adversely affect our overall profitability if we do not effectively manage the associated risks. We may not achieve our estimated revenue, profit or other financial projections with respect to our hardware business in a timely manner or at all due to a number of factors, including:
demand for competing hardware technologies such as cloud infrastructure compute and storage services, which could adversely affect demand for our hardware products offerings;
our hardware business has higher expenses as a percentage of revenues, and thus has been less profitable, than our cloud and on-premise software business;
our focus on our more profitable Oracle Engineered Systems, such as our Oracle Exadata Database Machine, Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud, Oracle Exalytics In-Memory Machine and Oracle SuperCluster products, which are in the relatively early stages of adoption by our customers, and the de-emphasis of our lower profit margin commodity hardware products, which could adversely affect our hardware revenues because the lower profit products have historically constituted a larger portion of our hardware revenues;
as we develop and introduce new versions or next generations of our hardware products, customers may defer or delay purchases of existing hardware products and wait for these new releases, all of which could adversely affect our hardware revenues in the short term;
a greater risk of material charges that could adversely affect our operating results, such as potential write-downs and impairments of our inventories; higher warranty expenses than what we experience in our cloud and on-premise software and services businesses; and amortization and potential impairment of intangible assets associated with our hardware business;
we may not be able to increase sales of hardware support contracts or such increase may take longer than we anticipate, which could result in lower revenues and profitability, or slower than expected growth of such revenues and profitability; and
we may acquire hardware companies that are strategically important to us but (1) operate in hardware businesses with historically lower operating margins than our own; (2) have different legacy business practices and go-to-market strategies than our own that we may alter as a part of our integration efforts, which may significantly impact our estimated revenues and profits from the acquired company; (3) leverage different platforms or competing technologies that we may encounter difficulties in integrating; or (4) utilize unique manufacturing processes that affect our ability to scale these acquired products within our own manufacturing operations.
Our hardware offerings are complex products. Ifproducts, and if we cannot successfully manage the required processes to meet customer requirements and demand on a timely basis,this complexity, the results of our hardware systems business will suffer. Designing, developing, manufacturing and introducing new hardware systems products are complicated processes. The development process for our hardware products is uncertain and requires a high level of innovation from both systems hardware and software product designers and engineers andinnovation. After the suppliers of the components used in these products. The development process is also lengthy and costly. Once a new hardware systems product is developed,phase, we face several challenges in the manufacturing process. We must be able to forecast customer demand and manufacture new hardware systems products in sufficient volumes to meet this demand and do so in a cost effectivecost-effective manner. Our “build-to-order” manufacturing model, in which our hardware systems products generally are not built until after customers place orders, may from time to time experience delays in delivering our hardware systems products to customers in a timely manner. These delays could cause our customers to purchase hardware products and services from our competitors. We must also manage new hardware product introductions and transitions to minimize the impact of customer delayed purchases of existing hardware systems products in anticipation of new hardware systems product releases. Because the design and manufacturing processes for components areIt is also very complicated, it is possible that we could experience design or manufacturing flaws. These design or manufacturing flaws, which could delay or prevent the production of the components for which we have previously committed to pay or need to fulfill orders from customers. These types of component flawscustomers and could also prevent the production of our hardware products or cause our hardware products to be returned, recalled or rejected resulting in lost revenues, increases in warranty costs or costs related to remediation efforts, damage to our reputation, penalties and litigation.
The future operating results of our hardware systems business will depend on our ability to manage our component inventory to meet the demands of our hardware systems customers and to avoid component inventory write-downs. We depend on suppliers to design, develop, manufacture and deliver on a timely basis the necessary technologies and components for our hardware products. While many of the components purchased are standard, some components (standard or otherwise) require long lead times to manufactureproducts, and deliver. Furthermore, there are some technologies and components that can only be purchased from a single vendor due to price, quality, technology, availability or other business constraints. As a result, our supply chain operations could be disrupted or negatively impacted by industry consolidation, natural disasters, political unrest, port stoppages or other transportation disruptions or slowdowns or other factors affecting the countries or regions where these single source component vendors are located.located or where the products are being shipped. We may be unable to purchase these items from the respective single vendors on acceptable terms or may experience significant delays or quality issues in the delivery of necessary technologies, parts or components from a particular vendor. If we had to find a new supplier for these technologies, parts and components, hardware systems product shipments could be delayed, which would adversely affect our hardware systems revenues. We could also experience fluctuations in component prices which, if unanticipated, could negatively impact our hardware systems business cost structure. Additionally, we could experience changes in shipping and logistics of our hardware products, which could result in fluctuations in prices and negatively impact our hardware margins. These factors may make it difficult for us to plan and procure appropriate component inventory levels in a timely fashion to meet customer demand for our hardware products. Therefore, we may experience component inventory shortages which may result in production delays or customers choosing to purchase fewer hardware products from us or systemshardware products from our competitors. We negotiate supply commitments with vendors early in the manufacturing process to ensure we have sufficient technologies and components for our hardware products to meet anticipated customer demand. We must also manage our levels of older component inventories used in our hardware products to minimize inventory write-offs or write-downs. If we have excess inventory, it may be necessary to write-down the inventory, which would adversely affect our operating results. If one or more of the risks described above occurs, our hardware systems business and related operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
We expect to continue to depend on third party manufacturers to build certain hardware systems products and third party logistics providers to deliver our products. As such, we are susceptible to third-party manufacturing and logistics delays, thatwhich could prevent us from shipping customer orders on time, if at all, and may result in the loss of sales and customers. We outsource the design, manufacturing, assembly and delivery of certain of our hardware products to a variety of companies, many of which are located outside the United States. Our reliance on these third parties reduces our control over the manufacturing and delivery process, exposing us to risks, including reduced control over quality assurance, product costs, product supply and delivery delays as well as the political and economic uncertainties and natural disasters of the international locations where certain of these third party third-party
manufacturers have facilities and operations. Some countries may raise national security concerns or impose market access restrictions based on location of manufacture or sourcing. Any manufacturing disruption or logistics delays by these third parties could impair our ability to fulfill orders for these hardware systems products for extended periods of time. If we are unable to manage our relationships with these third parties effectively, or if these third parties experience delays, disruptions, capacity constraints, regulatory issues or quality control problems in their operations, or fail to meet our future requirements for timely delivery, our ability to ship and/orand deliver certain of our hardware systems products to our customers could be impaired and our hardware systems business could be harmed.
We have simplified our supply chain processes by reducing the number of third partythird-party manufacturing partners and the number of locations where these third partythird-party manufacturers build our hardware systems products. We therefore have become more dependent on a fewer number of these manufacturing partners and locations. If these partners experience production problems or delays or cannot meet our demand for products, we may not be able to find alternate manufacturing sources in a timely or cost effectivecost-effective manner, if at all. If we are required to change third partythird-party manufacturers, our ability to meet our scheduled hardware systems products deliveries to our customers could be adversely affected, which could cause the loss of sales and existing or potential customers, delayed revenue recognition or an increase in our hardware systems products expenses, all of which could adversely affect the margins of our hardware business.
These challenges and risks also exist when we acquire companies with hardware products and related supply chain operations. In some cases, we may be dependent, at least initially, on these acquired companies’ supply chain operations that we are less familiar with and thus we may be slower to adjust or react to these challenges and risks.
We may experience foreign currency gainsOur software and losses.hardware indirect sales channel could affect our future operating results. We conductOur software and hardware indirect channel network is comprised primarily of resellers, system integrators/implementers, consultants, education providers, internet service providers, network integrators and independent software vendors. Our relationships with these channel participants are important elements of our software and hardware marketing and sales efforts. Our financial results could be adversely affected if our contracts with channel participants were terminated, if our relationships with channel participants were to deteriorate, if any of our competitors enter into strategic relationships with or acquire a significant number of transactions and hold cash in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Changes in the value of major foreign currencies, particularly the Euro, Japanese Yen and British Pound relative to the U.S. Dollar can significantly affect our assets, revenues and operating results. Generally, our revenues are adversely affected when the dollar strengthens relative to other currencies and are positively affected when the dollar weakens. Generally, our assets are adversely affected when we must devalue our cash and other bank deposits held in a foreign currency due to fluctuations or changes in exchange rates.
During fiscal 2013 and 2010, we incurred foreign currency losses associated with our Venezuelan subsidiary due to it being designated as operating in a highly inflationary economy and due to the subsequent devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar relative to the U.S. Dollar. We could experience similar foreign currency volatility in the futurechannel participant, if the Venezuelan government further devalues the Venezuelan currency, the amounts and timing of which are uncertain.
In addition, we incur foreign currency transaction gains and losses, primarily related to sublicense fees and other intercompany agreements among us and our subsidiaries that we expect to cash settle in the near term, which are charged against earnings in the period incurred. We have a program which primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risks associated with these foreign currency exposures that we may suspend from time to time. As a part of this program, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts so that increasesfinancial condition or decreases in our foreign currency exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with our foreign currency transaction gains or losses. A large portionoperations of our consolidated operations are international,channel participants were to weaken or if the level of demand for our channel participants’ products and we expectservices were to decrease. There can be no assurance that we will continue to realize gainsbe successful in maintaining, expanding or lossesdeveloping our relationships with respect to our foreign currency exposures, net of gains or losses from our foreign currency forward contracts. For example,channel participants. If we will experience foreign currency gainsare not successful, we may lose sales opportunities, customers and losses in certain instances if it is not possible or cost effective to hedge our foreign currency exposures or should we suspend our foreign currency forward contract program. Our ultimate realized loss or gain with respect to currency fluctuations will generally depend on the size and type of cross-currency exposures that we enter into, the currency exchange rates associated with these exposures and changes in those rates, whether we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to offset these exposures and other factors. All of these factors could materially impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows, the timing of which is variable and generally outside of our control.revenues.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights. We rely on copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures, controls and contractual commitments to protect our intellectual property rights. Despite our efforts, these protections may be limited. Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our products or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. Any patents owned by us may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged, may not be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at all. In addition, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our intellectual property rights as do the laws and courts of the United States. If we cannot protect our intellectual property rights against unauthorized copying or use, or other misappropriation, we may not remain competitive.
Third parties have claimed and, in the future, may claim infringement or misuse of intellectual property rights and/or breach of license agreement provisions. We periodically receive notices from, or have lawsuits filed against us by, others claiming infringement or other misuse of their intellectual property rights and/or breach of our agreements with them. These third parties include entities that do not have the capabilities to design, manufacture, or distribute products or services or that acquire intellectual property like patents for the sole purpose of monetizing their acquired intellectual property through asserting claims of infringement and misuse. We expect the number ofto continue to receive such claims will increase as:
we continue to acquire companies and expand into new businesses;
the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grows;
the use and support of third partythird-party code (including open source code) becomes more prevalent in the industry;
the volume of issued patents continues to increase; and
the proliferation of non-practicing entities asserting intellectual property infringement claims increases.
Responding to any such claim, regardless of its validity, could:
be time consuming, costly and result in litigation;
divert management’s time and attention from developing our business;
require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royalty and licensing agreements that we would not normally find acceptable;
require us to stop selling or to redesign certain of our products;
require us to release source code to third parties, possibly under open source license terms;
require us to satisfy indemnification obligations to our customers; or
otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Our periodic workforce restructurings, including reorganizations of our sales force, can be disruptive. We have in the past restructured or made other adjustments to our workforce, including our direct sales force on which we rely heavily, in response to management changes, product changes, performance issues, change in strategies, acquisitions and other internal and external considerations. In the past, these types of sales force restructurings have resulted in increased restructuring costs, increased sales and marketing costs and temporary reduced productivity while the sales teams adjusted to their new roles and responsibilities. In addition, we may not achieve or sustain the expected growth or cost savings benefits of these restructurings, or do so within the expected timeframe. These effects could recur in connection with future acquisitions and other restructurings and our revenues and other results of operations could be negatively affected.
We may lose key employees or may be unable to hire enough qualified employees. We rely on hiring qualified employees and the continued service of our senior management, including our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief ExecutiveTechnology Officer and founder, our Chief Executive Officers, other members of our executive team and other key employees and the hiring of new qualified employees. In the technology industry, there is substantial and continuous competition for highly skilled business, product development, technical and other personnel. In addition, acquisitions could cause us to lose key personnel of the acquired companies or at Oracle. We may also experience increased compensation costs that are not offset by either improved productivity or higher sales. We may not be successful in recruiting new personnel and in retaining and motivating existing personnel. With rare exceptions, we do not have long-term employment or non-competition agreements with our employees. Members of our senior management team have left Oracle over the years for a variety of reasons, and we cannot assure you that there will not be additional departures, which may be disruptive to our operations.
We continually focus on improving our cost structure by hiring personnel in countries where advanced technical expertise isand other expertise are available at lower costs. When we make adjustments to our workforce, we may incur expenses associated with workforce reductions that delay the benefit of a more efficient workforce structure. We may also experience increased competition for employees in these countries as the trend toward globalization continues, which may affect our employee retention efforts and increase our expenses in an effort to offer a competitive compensation program.
Our general compensation program includes restricted stock units, performance stock units and stock options, which are an important tooltools in attracting and retaining employees in our industry. If our stock price performs poorly, it may adversely affect our ability to retain or attract employees. In addition, because we expense all stock-basedWe continually evaluate our compensation we may in the future change our stock-basedpractices and other compensation practices. Some of theconsider changes we consider from time to time, include a reduction insuch as reducing the number of employees granted stock options, a reduction inequity awards or the number of stock optionsequity awards granted per employee and a change togranting alternative forms of stock-based compensation, all of which may have an impact on our ability to retain employees and also impact the amount of stock-based compensation expense that we record. Any changes in our compensation practices or changes made bythose of our competitors could affect our ability to retain and motivate existing personnel and recruit new personnel.
Our sales to government clients subjectexpose us to business volatility and risks, including government budgeting cycles and appropriations, early termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and penalties. We derive revenues from contracts with the U.S. government, state and local governments, and foreign governments and their respective agencies, which may terminate most of these contracts at any time, without cause. There is increased pressure foron governments and their agencies, both domestically and internationally, to reduce spending, including a series of spending cuts at the U.S. federal level known as “sequestration” that has recently gone into effect and which may cause a reduction in revenues from our U.S. federal government customers.spending. Further, our U.S. federal government contracts are subject to the approval of appropriations being made by the U.S. Congress to fund the expenditures under these contracts. Similarly, our contracts at thewith U.S. state and local levels in the U.S. and our contracts withgovernments, foreign governments and their agencies are generally subject to government funding authorizations. Additionally, government contracts are generally subject to audits and investigations which could result in various civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, refund of a portion of fees received, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspensions or debarment from future government business.
We may need to change our pricing models to compete successfully. The intense competition we face in the sales of our products and services and general economic and business conditions can put pressure on us to change our prices. If our competitors offer deep discounts on certain products or services or develop products that the marketplace considers more valuable, we may need to lower prices or offer other favorable terms in order to compete successfully. Any such changes may reduce margins and could adversely affect operating results. Our software license updates and product support fees and hardware systems support fees are generally priced as a percentage of our net new software licenses fees and net new hardware systems products fees, respectively. Our competitors may offer lower pricing on their support offerings, which could put pressure on us to further discount our new license prices.
Any broad-based change to our prices and pricing policies could cause our revenues to decline or be delayed as our sales force implements and our customers adjust to the new pricing policies. Some of our competitors may bundle products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy or provide guarantees of prices and product implementations. These practices could, over time, significantly constrain the prices that we can charge for certain of our products. If we do not adapt our pricing models to reflect changes in customer use of our products or changes in customer demand, our revenues could decrease. Additionally, increased distribution of applications through cloud and SaaS providers, may reduce the average price for our products or adversely affect other sales of our products, reducing our revenues unless we can offset price reductions with volume increases. The increase in open source software distribution may also cause us to change our pricing models.
We might experience significant errors in our software and hardware products and services. Despite testing prior to their release, software and hardware products sometimes contain errors, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. The detection and correction of any errors can be time consuming and costly. Errors in our software or hardware products could affect the ability of our products to work with other software or hardware products, could delay the development or release of new products or new versions of products and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products. If we experience errors or delays in releasing our new software or hardware products or new versions of our software or hardware products, we could lose revenues. In addition, we run our own business operations and run the cloud software subscriptions, Oracle managed cloud services and other services that we offer to our customers on our products and networks. Therefore any flaws, if exploited, could affect our ability to conduct our business operations. End users, who rely on our software products and services for applications that are critical to their businesses, may have a greater sensitivity to product errors than customers for software products generally. Errors in our software and hardware products or services could expose us to product liability, performance and/or warranty claims as well as harm our reputation, which could impact our future sales of products and services.
We may not receive significant revenues from our current research and development efforts for several years, if at all. Developing software, cloud and hardware productsofferings is expensive and the investment in productthe development of these offerings often involves a long return on investment cycle. We have made and expectAn important element of our corporate strategy is to continue to make significant investments in research and development and related product opportunities.and service opportunities both through internal investments and the acquisition of intellectual property from companies that we have acquired. Accelerated product and service introductions and short productsoftware and hardware life cycles require high levels of expenditures for research and development that could adversely affect our operating results if not offset by revenue increases. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position. However, we do not expect to receive significant revenues from these investments for several years, if at all.
Business disruptions could adversely affect our operating results. A significant portion of our research and development activities and certain other critical business operations are concentrated in a few geographic areas. We are a highly automated business and a disruption or failure of our systems could cause delays in completing sales and providing services, including some of our cloud software subscriptions and managed cloud services offerings. A major earthquake, fire or other catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or IT systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Adverse litigation results could affect our business. We are subject to various legal proceedings. Litigation can be lengthy, expensive and disruptive to our operations, and can divert our management’s attention away from the running of our core business. The results of our litigation also cannot be predicted with certainty. An adverse decision could result in monetary damages or injunctive relief that could affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Additional information regarding certain of the lawsuits we are involved in is discussed under Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities. As a multinational corporation, we are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities and those authorities often do not agree with positions taken by us on our tax returns.
Changes in tax laws or tax rulings may have a significantly adverse impact on our effective tax rate. For example, certain U.S. government proposals for fundamental U.S. internationalthe United States, many countries in the EU, and other countries where we do business, are actively considering or have enacted changes in relevant tax, reform, if enacted,accounting and other laws, regulations and interpretations, including changes to tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals, which could have a significant adverse impact on our effective tax rate. Further, in the ordinary course of a global business, there are many intercompany transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Our intercompany transfer pricing has been and is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and by foreign tax jurisdictions and will likely be subject to additional audits in the future. WeAlthough we have negotiated certain unilateral Advance Pricing Agreements with the IRS and certain selected bilateral Advance Pricing Agreements that cover manysome of our intercompany transfer pricing issues and preclude the relevant tax authorities from making a transfer pricing adjustment within the scope of these agreements. However,agreements, these agreements do not cover
substantial elements of our transfer pricing. In recent periods, transfer pricing audits in many foreign jurisdictions have become increasingly contentious. Similarly, certain jurisdictions are increasingly raising concerns about certain withholding tax matters. In addition, our provision for income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions which we consider to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States that have lower statutory tax rates and earnings being higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates.
We are also subject to non-income based taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property and goods and services taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities with respect to these non-income based taxes and may have exposure to additional non-income based tax liabilities. Our acquisition activities have increased our non-income based tax exposures, particularly with our entry into the hardware systems business, which increased the volume and complexity of laws and regulations that we are subject to and with which we must comply.
Although we believe that our income and non-income based tax estimates are reasonable, there is no assurance that the final determination of tax audits or tax disputes will not be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Charges to earnings resulting from acquisitions may adversely affect our operating results. Under business combination accounting standards pursuant to ASC 805,Business Combinations, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interests in acquired companies generally at their acquisition date fair values and, in each case, separately from goodwill. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess amount of consideration transferred, which is also generally measured at fair value, and the net of the acquisition date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain. After we complete an acquisition, the following factors could result in material charges and adversely affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash flows:
costs incurred to combine the operations of companies we acquire, such as transitional employee expenses and employee retention, redeployment or relocation expenses;
impairment of goodwill, or intangible assets, in particular within our hardware systems products or consulting reporting units, for which the amountsunit, or impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, that weboth asset types of which have recorded increased in recent years due to our acquisitions and may continue to increase in the future, and for which we have experienced revenues and margin declines as compared to prior years;future;
amortization of intangible assets acquired;
a reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;
identification of, or changes to, assumed contingent liabilities, both income tax and non-income tax related, after our final determination of the amounts for these contingencies or the conclusion of the measurement period (generally up to one year from the acquisition date), whichever comes first;
charges to our operating results to maintain certain duplicative pre-merger activities for an extended period of time or to maintain these activities for a period of time that is longer than we had anticipated, charges to eliminate certain duplicative pre-merger activities, and charges to restructure our operations or to reduce our cost structure;
charges to our operating results resulting fromdue to expenses incurred to effect the acquisition; and
charges to our operating results due to the expensing of certain stock awards assumed in an acquisition.
Substantially all of these costs will be accounted for as expenses that will decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those costs are incurred. For example, we recognized a goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 relating to our hardware reporting unit. Charges to our operating results in any given period could differ substantially from other periods based on the timing and size of our future acquisitions and the extent of integration activities. A more detailed discussion of our accounting for business combinations and other items is presented in the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 7).
There are risks associated with our outstanding and future indebtedness. As of May 31, 2013,2016, we had an aggregate of $18.5$43.9 billion of outstanding indebtedness that will mature between the remainder of calendar 2013year 2016 and calendar 2040year 2055 and we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our ability to pay interest and repay the principal for our indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations, generate sufficient cash flows to service such debt and the other factors discussed in this section. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage any of these risks successfully.
We may also need to refinance a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of our existing debt. Furthermore, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to that refinanced indebtedness would increase. Should we incur future increases in interest expense, our ability to utilize certain of our foreign tax credits to reduce our U.S. federal income tax could be limited, which could unfavorably affect our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate. In addition, changes by any rating agency to our outlook or credit rating could negatively affect the value of both our debt and equity securities and increase the interest amounts we pay on certain outstanding or future debt. These risks could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Environmental and other related laws and regulations subject us to a number of risks and could result in significant liabilities and costs. Some of our cloud and hardware systems operations are subject to state, federal and international laws governing protection of the environment, proper handling and disposal of materials used to manufacture ourfor these products, human health and safety, regulating the use of certain chemical substances and disclosurethe labor practices of the use of certain “conflict minerals.”suppliers. We endeavor to comply with these environmental and other laws, yet compliance with suchthese environmental and other laws could increase our product design, development, procurement, manufacturing, delivery, cloud operations and administration costs, limit our ability to manage excess and obsolete non-compliant inventory, change our sales activities, or otherwise impact future financial results of our cloud and hardware systems business.businesses. Any violation of these laws can subject us to significant liability, including fines, penalties and possible prohibition of sales of our products and services into one or more states or countries and result in a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our cloud and hardware systems business. businesses.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted disclosure requirements for companies that use certain “conflict minerals” (commonly referred to as tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold) in their products. Our supply chain is multi-tiered, global and highly complex. As a provider of hardware end products, we are several steps removed from the mining and smelting or refining of any conflict minerals in our supply chain. Accordingly, our ability to determine with certainty the origin and chain of custody of conflict minerals is limited. Our relationships with customers and suppliers could suffer if we are unable to describe our products as “conflict-free.” We may also face increased costs in complying with conflict minerals disclosure requirements.
A significant portion of our hardware systems revenues come from international sales. Environmental legislation, within the European Union (EU), includingsuch as the EU Directive on Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) and, the EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE Directive), as well as and China’s regulation on Management Methods for Controlling Pollution Caused by Electronic Information Products, may increase our cost of doing business internationally and impact our hardware systems revenues from the EU, China and other countries and Chinawith similar environmental legislation as we endeavor to comply with and implement these requirements. In addition, similar environmental legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, theThe cumulative impact of whichinternational environmental legislation could be significant.
Our stock price could become more volatile and your investment could lose value. All of the factors discussed in this section could affect our stock price. The timing of announcements in the public market regarding new products, product enhancements or technological advances by our competitors or us and any announcements by us of acquisitions, major transactions, or management changes could also affect our stock price. Changes in the amounts and frequency of share repurchases or dividends could adversely affect our stock price. Our stock price is subject to speculation in the press and the analyst community, changes in recommendations or earnings estimates by financial analysts, changes in investors’ or analysts’ valuation measures for our stock, our credit ratings and market trends unrelated to our performance. A significant drop in our stock price could also expose us to the risk of securities class actions lawsuits, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Our properties consist of owned and leased office facilities for sales, support, research and development, consulting,services, manufacturing, cloud operations and administrative personnel.and other functions. Our headquarters facility consists of approximately 2.0 million square feet in Redwood City, California, substantially all of which we own. We lease our principal internal manufacturing facility for our hardware systems products in Hillsboro, Oregon. We also own or lease other office facilities for current use consisting of approximately 23.825.1 million square feet in various other locations in the United States and abroad. Approximately 2.6 million square feet, or 10%, of our total owned and leased space is sublet or is being actively marketed for sublease or disposition. We lease our principal internal manufacturing facility for our hardware products in Hillsboro, Oregon. Our cloud operations deliver our Oracle Cloud offerings through the use of global data centers including those that we own and operate in Austin, Texas, West Jordan, Utah, and Linlithgow, Scotland and those that we utilize through colocation suppliers. We believe our facilities are in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business. Approximately 3.9 million square feet, or 15%, of total owned and leased space is sublet or is being actively marketed for sublease or disposition.
The material set forth in Note 15 (pertaining to information regarding contingencies related to our income taxes) and Note 18 (pertaining to information regarding legal contingencies) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ORCL” and has been traded on the NASDAQ since our initial public offering in 1986. On June 20, 2013, we announced that we applied to list our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under our currentthe symbol “ORCL”. Subject to the approval by the NYSE of our listing application, we expect that our common stock will begin trading on the NYSE on July 15, 2013.“ORCL.” According to the records of our transfer agent, we had 13,27010,869 stockholders of record as of May 31, 2013.2016. The following table sets forth the low and high sale prices per share of our common stock, based on the last daily sale, in each of our last eight fiscal quarters.
| Fiscal 2013 | Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2016 | Fiscal 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low Sale Price | High Sale Price | Low Sale Price | High Sale Price | Low Sale Price | High Sale Price | Low Sale Price | High Sale Price | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 31.25 | $ | 36.34 | $ | 25.61 | $ | 30.24 | $ | 37.76 | $ | 41.61 | $ | 41.47 | $ | 44.73 | ||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | $ | 31.61 | $ | 36.21 | $ | 25.51 | $ | 31.90 | $ | 33.94 | $ | 39.23 | $ | 39.95 | $ | 46.23 | ||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter | $ | 29.58 | $ | 33.10 | $ | 26.00 | $ | 33.69 | $ | 35.44 | $ | 40.62 | $ | 37.56 | $ | 42.41 | ||||||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 26.00 | $ | 32.20 | $ | 24.78 | $ | 34.09 | $ | 35.45 | $ | 44.91 | $ | 39.61 | $ | 42.81 | ||||||||||||||||
During fiscal 2013, our Board of Directors declared and paid cash dividends in the aggregate of $0.30 per share of outstanding common stock, which included an accelerated cash dividend of $0.18 per share of outstanding common stock paid on December 21, 2012. This accelerated cash dividend was intended by our Board of Directors to be in lieu of quarterly dividends that we would have otherwise announced with our earnings results for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2013, and that would have been paid in calendar year 2013. During fiscal 2012, weWe declared and paid cash dividends totaling $0.24$0.60 and $0.51 per share of outstanding common stock.share over the course of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively.
In June 2013,2016, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12$0.15 per share of outstanding common stock. This $0.12 per share cash dividend was an increase of $0.06 per share over the last regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share ofour outstanding common stock paid on November 2, 2012 and was declared earlier than the Board of Directors had previously planned. The $0.12 per share cash dividend is payable on August 2, 2013July 27, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 12, 2013.6, 2016. We currently expect to continue paying comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future;basis; however, future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination of our Board of Directors.
For equity compensation plan information, please refer to Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report.
Stock Repurchase Programs
Our Board of Directors has approved a program for us to repurchase shares of our common stock. On June 18, 2012,March 15, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an expansion of our stock repurchase program by an additional $10.0 billion. On June 20, 2013, we announced that our BoardAs of Directors approved a further expansion by an additional $12.0 billion. Approximately $2.1May 31, 2016, approximately $8.8 billion remained available for stock repurchases as of May 31, 2013 pursuant to our stock repurchase program prior to the additional amount authorized in June 2013.program.
Our stock repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date and the pace of our repurchase activity will depend on factors such as our working capital needs, our cash requirements for acquisitions and dividend payments, our debt repayment obligations or repurchases of our debt, our stock price, and economic and market conditions. Our stock repurchases may be effected from time to time through open market purchases or pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Our stock repurchase program may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time.
The following table summarizes the stock repurchase activity for the three months ended May 31, 20132016 and the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program:
(in millions, except per share amounts) | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program | ||||||||||||
March 1, 2013—March 31, 2013 | 22.5 | $ | 34.12 | 22.5 | $ | 4,185.0 | ||||||||||
April 1, 2013—April 30, 2013 | 33.7 | $ | 32.68 | 33.7 | $ | 3,084.8 | ||||||||||
May 1, 2013—May 31, 2013 | 28.2 | $ | 33.97 | 28.2 | $ | 2,125.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | 84.4 | $ | 33.49 | 84.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program | ||||||||||||
March 1, 2016—March 31, 2016 | 16.9 | $ | 39.50 | 16.9 | $ | 10,142.4 | ||||||||||
April 1, 2016—April 30, 2016 | 15.8 | $ | 40.80 | 15.8 | $ | 9,496.6 | ||||||||||
May 1, 2016—May 31, 2016 | 16.5 | $ | 39.69 | 16.5 | $ | 8,840.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | 49.2 | $ | 39.98 | 49.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Information Technology Index for each of the last five fiscal years ended May 31, 2013,2016, assuming an investment of $100 at the beginning of such period and the reinvestment of any dividends. The comparisons in the graphs below are based upon historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock.
*$100 INVESTED ON MAY 31, 20082011 IN STOCK OR
INDEX-INCLUDING REINVESTMENT OF DIVIDENDS
| 5/08 | 5/09 | 5/10 | 5/11 | 5/12 | 5/13 | 5/11 | 5/12 | 5/13 | 5/14 | 5/15 | 5/16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oracle Corporation | 100.00 | 85.99 | 99.94 | 152.65 | 119.04 | 153.38 | 100.00 | 77.98 | 100.48 | 126.70 | 132.75 | 124.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100.00 | 67.43 | 81.58 | 102.76 | 102.33 | 130.24 | 100.00 | 99.59 | 126.75 | 152.67 | 170.69 | 173.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S&P Information Technology Index | 100.00 | 71.24 | 91.52 | 110.86 | 119.25 | 137.29 | 100.00 | 107.57 | 123.83 | 153.42 | 182.29 | 187.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and for theour last five fiscal years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 15 of this Annual Report. Over theour last five fiscal years, we have acquired a number of companies, including Sun Microsystems,MICROS Systems, Inc. in fiscal 2010,2015, among others. The results of our acquired companies have been included in our consolidated financial statements since their respective dates of acquisition and have contributed to our growth in revenues, income, earnings per share and total assets.
| As of and for the Year Ended May 31, | As of and for the Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2016(1) | 2015(1) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 37,180 | $ | 37,121 | $ | 35,622 | $ | 26,820 | $ | 23,252 | $ | 37,047 | $ | 38,226 | $ | 38,275 | $ | 37,180 | $ | 37,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 14,684 | $ | 13,706 | $ | 12,033 | $ | 9,062 | $ | 8,321 | $ | 12,604 | $ | 13,871 | $ | 14,759 | $ | 14,684 | $ | 13,706 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | $ | 6,135 | $ | 5,593 | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.38 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.96 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 4,844 | 5,095 | 5,128 | 5,073 | 5,130 | 4,305 | 4,503 | 4,604 | 4,844 | 5,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 28,820 | $ | 24,635 | $ | 24,982 | $ | 12,313 | $ | 9,432 | $ | 47,105 | $ | 47,892 | $ | 33,739 | $ | 28,813 | $ | 24,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 81,812 | $ | 78,327 | $ | 73,535 | $ | 61,578 | $ | 47,416 | $ | 112,180 | $ | 110,903 | $ | 90,266 | $ | 81,745 | $ | 78,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable and other borrowings | $ | 18,494 | $ | 16,474 | $ | 15,922 | $ | 14,655 | $ | 10,238 | $ | 43,855 | $ | 41,958 | $ | 24,097 | $ | 18,427 | $ | 16,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Our results of operations for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, and fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, were significantly impacted by movements in international currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar, which decreased our fiscal 2016 and 2015 total revenues by 5 and 4 percentage points, respectively, total operating expenses by 4 and 3 percentage points, respectively, and total operating income by 7 and 6 percentage points, respectively, in comparison to the corresponding prior year periods. |
Total working capital and total assets sequentially increased in |
Our notes payable and other borrowings, which represented the summation of our notes payable, current and other current borrowings, and notes payable and other non-current borrowings as reported per our consolidated balance sheets as of the dates listed in the table above, increased between fiscal |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We begin Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations with an overview of our businesses, key operating business segments and significant trends. This overview is followed by a summary of our critical accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. We then provide a more detailed analysis of our results of operations and financial condition.
Business Overview
We are the world’s largest provider of enterprise software and a leading provider of computer hardwareOracle Corporation provides products and services that are engineered to work togetheraddress all aspects of corporate information technology (IT) environments—application, platform and infrastructure. Our Oracle Cloud offerings provide a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of application, platform, compute and storage services in all three primary layers of the cloud: Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). Our on-premise offerings include Oracle database and middleware software, application software, hardware (Oracle Engineered Systems, servers, storage, networking and industry-specific products), and related support and services. We provide our cloud and on-premise offerings to over 400,000 worldwide customers via deployment models that best suit their needs.
Our comprehensive and fully integrated stack of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings integrate the software, hardware and services on the customers’ behalf in IT environments that we deploy, support and manage for the data center.customer. Our integrated Oracle Cloud offerings are designed to be rapidly deployable to enable customers shorter time to innovation; easily maintainable to reduce integration and testing work; connectable among differing deployment models to enable interchangeability and extendibility between cloud and on-premise IT environments; compatible to easily move workloads between on-premise IT environments and the Oracle Cloud; cost-effective by requiring lower upfront customer investment; and secure, standards-based and reliable. We are a leader in the core technologies of cloud computing,IT environments, including database and middleware software as well as web-basedenterprise applications, virtualization, clustering, and large-scale systems management. We provide cloudmanagement and related infrastructure. Our products and services as well as software and hardware products to other cloud service providers, both public and private. Oracle database and middleware software, applications software and hardware systems—including computer server, storage and networking products—are the building blocks of our own cloudOracle Cloud services, our partners’ cloud services and our customers’ private cloud IT environments. Our customers can subscribe
In addition to use select Oracle software and hardware products through ourproviding a broad spectrum of cloud offerings, or purchasewe develop and sell our software and hardware products and related services to buildour customers worldwide for use in their own private cloud orglobal data centers and on-premise information technology (IT)IT environments. OurAn important element of our corporate strategy is to deliver reliablecontinue our investments in, and scalable products and services that are built upon industry standards and are engineered to work together or independently. We also pursue new or emerging growth opportunities in order to maintain technology leadership. Offering customers a choice in how they use our products and services—while maintaining enterprise-grade reliability, security, and interoperability—is important to our corporate strategy.
We believe that internal growth and continued innovation with respect to, our products and services that we offer through our cloud and on-premise software, hardware and services businesses arebusinesses. We have a deep understanding as to how all components within IT environments—application, platform and infrastructure—interact and function with one another. We focus our development efforts on improving the foundationperformance, security, operation and integration of our long-term strategic plans. In fiscal 2013, we invested $4.9 billion, and in each of fiscal 2012 and 2011 we invested $4.5 billion, in research and development to enhance our existing portfolio of products and services and to develop new products and services. We continue to focus the engineering of our hardware and software productsthese differing technologies to make them work together more effectivelycost-effective and deliver improved computing performance, reliabilityeasier to deploy, manage and securitymaintain for our customers and to our customers. For example, Oracle Engineered Systems, which include our Oracle Exadata Database Machine, Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud and Oracle SPARC SuperCluster products, among others, combine certain of our hardware and software offerings in a way that increasesimprove their computing performance relative to our competitors’competitors. After the initial purchase of Oracle products creating time savings, efficiencies and operational cost advantages for our customers. With products that are engineered to work together,services, our customers can reduce much of the complexity of IT and make available resources they would otherwise spend on IT operations. In addition to our introductions of new, innovative hardware and software products, we also continue to demonstratetake advantage of our commitmentresearch and development investments and deep IT expertise by purchasing and renewing Oracle support offerings, which may include product enhancements that we periodically deliver to customer choice through ongoing enhancements to our existing products, including our Oracle E-Business Suite, Siebel, PeopleSoft and JD Edwards applicationsapplication software products.products, among others, or by renewing their SaaS, PaaS and IaaS contracts with us.
As customers deploy with the Oracle Cloud, many are adopting a hybrid IT model whereby certain of their IT resources are deployed and managed through the Oracle Cloud, while other of their IT resources are deployed and managed on-premise, and both sets of resources can be managed as one. We believe that anfocus the engineering of our products and services to best connect these different deployment models to enable flexibility, ease, agility, compatibility, extensibility and seamlessness.
A selective and active acquisition program is another important element of our corporate strategy as it enhancesstrategy. We believe our acquisitions enhance the products and services that we can offer to customers, expandsexpand our customer base, providesprovide greater scale to accelerate innovation, growsgrow our revenues and earnings, and increasesincrease stockholder value. In recent years, we have invested billions of dollars to acquire a number of companies, products, services and
technologies that add to, are complementary to, or have otherwise enhanced our existing offerings. We expect to continue to acquire companies, products, services and technologies to further our corporate strategy.
We are organized intohave three businesses—businesses that deliver our application, platform and infrastructure technologies: cloud and on-premise software, hardware systems and services—which areservices. These businesses can be further divided into certain operating segments.segments (Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report, provides additional information related to our operating segments). Each of our businesses and operating segments has unique characteristics and faces different opportunities and challenges. Although we report our actual results in U.S. Dollars, we conduct a significant number of transactions in currencies other than U.S. Dollars. Therefore, we present constant currency information to provide a framework for assessing how our underlying businesses performed excluding the effecteffects of foreign currency rate fluctuations. An overview of our three businesses and related operating segments follows.
Cloud and On-Premise Software Business
Our cloud and on-premise software business, which represented 74%78%, 70%77% and 68%76% of our total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, is comprised of twothree operating segments: (1) new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions and on-premise software, (2) cloud IaaS and (3) software license updates and product support. On a constant currency basis, we expect that our cloud and on-premise software business’ total revenues generally will continue to increase due to continued demand for our software products, expected growth in our cloud and subscription offerings, our software license updates and product support offerings, including the high percentage of customers that renew their software license updates and product support contracts, and contributions from our acquisitions, which should allow us to grow our profits and continue to make investments in research and development.
New Software Licenses and Cloud Software Subscriptions:and On-Premise Software: We license our database and middleware, as well as our applicationsOur cloud software and provide access toon-premise software line of business markets, sells and delivers a broad rangespectrum of application and platform technologies through our SaaS and PaaS offerings, which are certain of our software applications and platforms that are delivered via a cloud-based IT environment that we host, manage and support, and through the licensing of our software products including Oracle Applications, Oracle Database, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Java, among others.
We believe the comprehensiveness and breadth of our SaaS, PaaS and on-premise software offerings through cloudprovides greater benefit to our customers and differentiates us from many of our competitors that offer more limited or specialized software subscriptions contracts.offerings. Our software solutionsSaaS and PaaS offerings are built on a standards-based, integrated architecture that is designed to help customers reducebe interoperable with one another, thereby limiting the costintegration and complexitytuning of their IT infrastructure.multiple cloud applications from multiple vendors. Our SaaS and PaaS offerings are designed to deliver secure data isolation and flexible upgrades, self-service access controls for users, a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) for integration with on-premise systems, and a high performance, high availability infrastructure based on our infrastructure technologies including Oracle Engineered Systems. Our on-premise software productsofferings are substantially designed to operate on both single server and clustered server configurations for cloud or on-premise IT environments, and to support a choice of operating systems including Oracle Solaris, Oracle Linux, Microsoft Windows and third partythird-party UNIX products, among others. Our commitment to industry standards results in software offerings that work in customer environments with Oracle or non-Oracle hardware or software components and that can be adapted to meet specific industry or business needs. We focus the engineering of our products and services to best connect cloud and on-premise deployment models to enable flexibility, ease, agility, compatibility, extensibility and seamlessness. All of these approaches are designed to support customer choice and reduce customer risk. Our customers include businesses of many sizes, government agencies, educational institutions and resellers. We market and sell our software products and servicesofferings to these customers with a sales force positioned to offer the combinations that best fit theircustomer needs. We enable customers to evolve and transform to substantially any IT environment at whatever pace is most appropriate for them.
The growth inOur SaaS and PaaS revenues and new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues that we report isare affected by the strength of general economic and business conditions, governmental budgetary constraints, the strategy for and competitive position of our software offerings, our acquisitions, our ability to deliver and renew our SaaS and PaaS contracts with our existing customers and foreign currency rate fluctuations. In recent periods, we have placed significant strategic emphasis on growing our cloud SaaS and PaaS revenues, which has affected the growth of our cloud SaaS and
PaaS revenues and our new software licenses revenues and the related expenses. We expect these trends will continue. Our SaaS and PaaS arrangements are generally one to three years in duration and we strive to renew these contracts when they are eligible for renewal. The substantial majority of our new software licenseslicense transactions isare characterized by long sales cycles and the timing of a few large software license transactions can substantially affect our quarterly new software licenses revenues.
Cloud software and cloudon-premise software subscriptions revenues. Since our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues in a particular quarter can be difficult to predict as a result of the timing of a few large software license transactions, we believe that analysis of new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues on a trailing 4-quarter period (as provided in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q) provides additional visibility into the underlying performance of this business segment. New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues represented 28%25%, 27%26% and 26%28% of our total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Our cloud software subscriptions contracts are generally one to three years in duration and we strive to renew these contracts when they are eligible for renewal. Our newon-premise software licenses and cloud software subscriptions segment’s margin has historically trended upward over the course of the four quarters within a particular fiscal year due to the historical upward trend of our new software licenses revenues over those quarterly periods and because the majority of our costs for this segment are predominantly fixed in the short-term. However,short term. As discussed further below under “Supplemental Disclosure Related to Certain Charges,” our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software segment’s margin has been and will continue to be affected by the fair value adjustments relating to the cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS obligations that we assumed in our business combinations (described further below) and by the amortization of intangible assets associated with companies and technologies that we have acquired.
For certainCloud Infrastructure as a Service: Our cloud IaaS segment, which represented 2% of our acquired businesses, we recorded adjustments to reduce cloud software subscriptions obligations to their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. As a result, as required by business combination accounting rules, we did not recognize cloud software subscriptionstotal revenues related to cloud software subscriptions contracts that would have been otherwise recorded by the acquired businesses as independent entities in the amountseach of $45 millionfiscal 2016 and $22 million2015, and 1% of our total revenues in fiscal 20132014, provides infrastructure cloud services that are enterprise-grade, hosted and 2012, respectively. Tosupported within the extent underlyingOracle Cloud to perform elastic compute, storage and networking services on a subscription basis. Our cloud IaaS segment also offers Oracle Managed Cloud Services, which are comprehensive software subscriptions contractsand hardware management and maintenance services for customer IT infrastructure for a fee for a stated term that are renewed with us following an acquisition, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of the cloud software subscriptions contracts over their respective contractual periods.hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities.
Software License Updates and Product Support: Software license updates and product support revenues are generated through the sale of software support contracts relating to on-premise new software licenses purchased by our customers. Customers that purchase software license updates and product support are granted rights to unspecified product upgrades and maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period, as well as technical support assistance. Our software license updates and product support contracts are generally one year in duration and substantiallyduration. Substantially all of our on-premise software license customers renew their software license updates and product support contracts annually. The growth of software license updates and product support revenues is primarily influenced by three factors: (1) the percentage of our software support contract customer base that renews its software support contracts, (2) the amount of new software support contracts sold in connection with the sale of new software licenses and (3) the amount of software support contracts assumed from companies we have acquired.
Software license updates and product support revenues, which represented 46%51%, 43%49% and 42%47% of our total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, is our highest margin business unit. Our software support margins during fiscal 20132016 were 88%91% and accounted for 74%86% of our total margins over the same period. Our software license updates and product support margins have been affected by fair value adjustments relating to software support obligations assumed in business combinations (described further below) and by the amortization of intangible assets. However, overassets, both of which are discussed further below under “Supplemental Disclosure Related to Certain Charges.” Over the longer term, we believe that software license updates and product support revenues and margins will grow for the following reasons:
substantially all of our on-premise new software license customers, including customers from acquired companies, renew their software support contracts when eligible for renewal;
substantially all of our customers purchase software license updates and product support contracts when they buy new software licenses, resulting in a further increase in our software support contract base. Even if new software licenses revenues growth was flat, software license updates and product support revenues would continue to grow in comparison to the corresponding prior year periods assuming contract renewal and cancellation rates and foreign currency rates remained relatively constant, since substantially all new software licenses transactions result in the sale of software license updates and product support contracts, which add to our software support contract base; and
|
our acquisitions have increased our software support contract base, as well as the portfolio of products available to be licensed and supported.
We recorded adjustments to reduce software support obligations assumed in business combinations to their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. As a result, as required by business combination accounting rules, we did not recognize software license updates and product support revenues related to software support contracts that would have been otherwise recorded by the acquired businesses as independent entities in the amounts of $14 million, $48 million and $80 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. To the extent underlying software support contracts are renewed with us following an acquisition, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of the software support contracts over the respective support periods, the majority of which are one year.
Hardware Systems Business
Our hardware systems business is comprised of two operating segments: (1) hardware systems products and (2) hardware systems support. Our hardware business represented 14%, 17% and 19%13% of our total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, and 2011, respectively.14% of our total revenues in each of fiscal 2015 and 2014. We expect our hardware business to have lower operating margins as a percentage of revenues than our cloud and on-premise software business due to the incremental costs we incur to produce and distribute these products and to provide support services, including direct materials and labor costs. We expect to make investments in research and development to improve existing hardware products and services and to develop new hardware products and services.
Hardware Systems Products:We provide a broad selection of hardware systems and related services, including Oracle Engineered Systems, servers, storage, networking, workstations and related devices, industry-specific hardware, virtualization software, operating systems, and management software to support diverse IT environments, including public and private cloud computing environments. We engineer our hardware systemsproducts with virtualization and management capabilities to enable the rapid deployment and efficient management of cloud and on-premise IT infrastructures. Our hardware products support many of the world’s largest public and private clouds,cloud infrastructures, including the Oracle Cloud;Cloud.
Our hardware products are designed to be easier to deploy, manage and maintain for our software development private cloud;customers and to improve computing performance relative to our Oracle University self-service private cloud.
competitors’ offerings. We have also engineereddesign our hardware systems products to create performanceseamlessly connect cloud and operational cost advantages foron-premise IT environments to further enable interoperability, interchangeability and extendibility and to work in customer environments that may include other Oracle or non-Oracle hardware or software components. Our flexible and open approach provides Oracle customers whenwith a broad range of choices in how they deploy our hardware and software products, are combined as Oracle Engineered Systems. which we believe is a priority for our customers.
Oracle Engineered Systems are core building blocks for Oracle’sto our hardware offerings and are important elements of our data center and cloud computing offerings including the Oracle Cloud. These pre-integrated products are designed to integrate multiple Oracle technology components to work together to deliver improved performance, availability, security and services.operational efficiency relative to our competitors’ products; to be upgraded effectively and efficiently; and to simplify maintenance cycles by providing a single solution for software patching. Oracle Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), an on-premise cloud offering for deploying Oracle’s Engineered Systems are tested before they are shipped to customers on a subscription basis, provides our customers with flexibility in deployment models and allows ourdelivered ready-to-run, enabling customers to cost effectively handle peak computing workloads with capacity on demand.shorten deployment time to production. We offer certain of our Oracle Engineered Systems technologies through flexible deployment options including as a cloud service and for on-premise IT environments.
We offer a wide range of server systemsproducts using our SPARC microprocessor. Our SPARC servers run the Oracle Solaris operating system and are designed to be differentiated by their reliability, security, and scalability. Our mid-size and large servers are designed to offer greaterbetter performance and lower total cost of ownership than mainframecompetitive UNIX systems for business critical applications, for customers having more computationally intensive needs, and as platforms for building cloud computing IT environments. Our SPARC servers are also a core component of the Oracle SPARC SuperCluster, one of our Oracle Engineered Systems.
We also offer enterprise x86 servers. These x86 servers are based on microprocessor platformsmicroprocessors from Intel Corporation (Intel) and are also compatible with Oracle Solaris, Oracle Linux, Microsoft Windows and other operating systems. Our x86 systemsservers are also a core component of many of our Oracle Engineered Systems including the Oracle Exadata Database Machine, Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud, Oracle Exalytics In-Memory Machine and the Oracle Big Data Appliance.
Our storage products are engineered for the cloud and designed to securely store, manage, protect, archive, backup and restorerecover customers’ mission critical data assets andassets. Our storage products consist of tape, disk, flash, tape, virtual tape and hardware-related software including file systems software, back-up and archive software, andhierarchical storage management software and networking for mainframe and openheterogeneous systems environments. We also offer certain of our storage offerings as a cloud service.
Our networking and data center fabric products, including Oracle Virtual Networking, and Oracle InfiniBand and Ethernet technologies, are used with our server and storage products and are integrated into our management tools to help enterprise customers improve infrastructure performance, reduce cost and complexity and simplify storage and server connectivity.
We offer hardware products and services designed for certain specific industries. Our point-of-sale hardware offerings include point-of-sale terminals and related hardware that are designed for managing businesses within the food and beverage, hotel and retail industries, among others. Our hardware products and services for communications networks include network signaling, policy control and subscriber data management solutions, and session border control technology, among others.
The majority of our hardware systems products are sold through indirect channels, including independent distributors and value addedvalue-added resellers.
To produce our hardware products, we rely on both our internal manufacturing operations as well as third partythird-party manufacturing partners. Our internal manufacturing operations consist primarily of materials procurement, assembly, testing and quality control of our Oracle Engineered Systems and certain of our enterprise and data center servers and storage systems.products. For all other manufacturing, we generally rely on third partythird-party manufacturing partners to produce our hardware relatedhardware-related components and hardware products and we may involve our internal manufacturing operations in the final assembly, testing and quality control processes for these components and products. We distribute most of our hardware products either from our facilities or partner facilities. We strive to reduce costs by simplifying our manufacturing processes through increased standardization of components across product types and a “build-to-order” manufacturing process in which products generally are built only after customers have placed firm orders. We continue to evolve hardware systems support processes that are intended to proactively identify and solve quality issues and to increase the amount of new and renewed hardware systems support contracts sold in connection with the sales of our hardware systems products.
Our hardware systems products revenues, cost of hardware systems products and hardware systems operating margins that we report are affected by our strategy for and the competitive position of our hardware systems products, the strength of general economic and business conditions, governmental budgetary constraints, certain of our acquisitions and foreign currency rate fluctuations. In addition, our operating margins for our hardware systems products segment have been and will be affected by the amortization of intangible assets.
We have limited experience in predicting ourOur quarterly hardware systems products revenues.revenues are difficult to predict. The timing of customer orders and delays in our ability to timely manufacture or deliver a few large hardware transactions, among other factors, could substantially affect the amount of hardware systems products revenues, expenses and operating margins that we report.
Hardware Systems Support: Our hardware systems support offerings provide customers with software updates for software components that are essential to the functionality of our server and storagehardware products, such as Oracle Solaris and certain other software products, and can include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services. Typically, our hardware systems support contract arrangements are priced as a percentage of the net hardware products fees, are invoiced to the customer at the beginning of the support period and are one year in duration. We continue to evolve hardware support processes that are intended to proactively identify and solve quality issues and to increase the amount of new and renewed hardware support contracts sold in connection with the sales of our hardware products. Our hardware systems support revenues that we report are influenced by a number of factors, including the volume of purchases of hardware products, the pricing and mix of hardware products purchased, whether customers decide to purchase hardware systems support contracts at or in close proximity to the time of hardware product sale, and the percentage of our hardware systems support contract customer base that renews its support contracts. Allcontracts and our acquisitions. Substantially all of these factors are heavily influenced by our customers’ decisions to either maintain or upgrade their existing hardware systems’ infrastructure to newly developed technologies that are available.
Our hardware systems support margins have been and will be affected by certain of our acquisitions and related accounting, including fair value adjustments relating to hardware systems support obligations assumed and by the amortization of intangible assets. As required by business combination accounting rules, we recorded adjustmentsassets, both of which are discussed further below under “Supplemental Disclosure Related to reduce our hardware systems support revenues for contracts assumed from our acquisitions to their estimated fair values. These amounts would have been recorded as hardware systems support revenues by the acquired businesses as independent entities in the amounts of $14 million, $30 million and $148 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. To the extent underlying hardware systems support contracts are renewed with us following an acquisition, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of the hardware systems support contracts over the respective support periods.Certain Charges.”
Services Business
Our services business, which represented 9% of our total revenues in each of fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively, and 10% of our total revenues in fiscal 2014, is comprised of the remainder of our operating segments and offers consulting services, managed cloud services and education services.segments. Our services business which represented 12% of our total revenues in fiscal 2013 and 13% in each of fiscal 2012 and 2011, has lower margins than our cloud and on-premise software and hardware businesses. Our services revenues are impacted by our strategy for and the competitive position of our services, certain of our acquisitions, general economic conditions, governmental budgetary constraints, personnel reductions in our customers’ IT departments, tighter controls over discretionary spending, our strategic emphasis on growing our cloud revenues and the growth in our software and hardware systems products revenues.offerings. Our services business’ offerings include:
Our
consulting line of business isservices that are designed to help our customers and global system integrator partners more successfully architect and deploy our products. Our consulting services include business andofferings, including IT strategy alignment, enterprise architecture planning and design, initial productsoftware implementation and integration, and ongoing productsoftware enhancements and upgrades. The amountWe utilize a global, blended delivery model to optimize value for our customers and partners, consisting of consulting revenues recognized tends to lag the amount ofon-premise consultants from local geographies, industry specialists and consultants from our softwareglobal delivery and hardware systems products revenues by several quarters since consulting services, if purchased, are typically segmentable from the products to which they relate and are performed after the customer’s purchase of the products. Our services revenues as they relate to consulting services are dependent upon general economic conditions and the levelsolution centers;
of our product revenues, in particular the new software licenses sales of our application products. To the extent we are able to grow our products revenues, in particular our software application product revenues, we would also generally expect to be able to eventually grow our consulting revenues.
Oracle managed cloud services provide comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services—including deployment, management, monitoring, patching, security and upgrade services—for customers hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise atadvanced customer facilities. Additionally, we provide support services, bothwhich are provided on-premise and remote,remotely to our customers to enable increased performance and higher availability of their Oracle products and services. We believe that our managed cloud services offerings provide our customers with greater value and choice through increased business performance, reduced risk, a predictable costalso include certain other services; and more flexibility in terms of service in order to maximize the performance of their
education services for Oracle software and hardware products and services.
Education services, provideincluding training and certification programs that are offered to customers, partners and employees asthrough a partvariety of formats, including instructor-led classes at our mission of accelerating the adoptioneducation centers, live virtual training, self-paced online training, private events and use of our software and hardware products and to create opportunities to grow our product revenues.custom training.
Acquisitions
AnA selective and active acquisition program is another important element of our corporate strategy. In recent years, we have invested billions of dollars to acquire a number of complementary companies, products, services and technologies, including Acme Packet,MICROS Systems, Inc. (Acme Packet)(MICROS) in fiscal 2013, and Taleo Corporation (Taleo) and RightNow Technologies, Inc. (RightNow) in fiscal 2012, among others. 2015.
We believe our acquisition program strengthens our competitive position, enhances the products and services that we can offer to customers, expands our customer base, provides greater scale to accelerate innovation, grows our revenues and earnings and increases stockholder value. We expect to continue to acquire companies, products, services and technologies in furtherance of our corporate strategy. Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report provides additional information related to our pending and recent acquisitions.
We believe that we can fund our pending and future acquisitions with our internally available cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, cash generated from operations, additional borrowings or from the issuance of additional securities. We estimate the financial impact of any potential acquisition with regard to earnings, operating margin, cash flow and return on invested capital targets before deciding to move forward with an acquisition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (Codification)(ASC), and we consider the various staff accounting bulletins and other applicable guidance issued by the United StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Commission. GAAP, as set forth within the Codification,ASC, requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent that there are differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our
more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:include:
Revenue RecognitionRecognition;
Business CombinationsCombinations;
Goodwill and Intangible Assets—Impairment AssessmentsAssessments;
Accounting for Income TaxesTaxes; and
Legal and Other ContingenciesContingencies.
Stock-Based Compensation
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed our critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition
Our sources of revenues include: (1)
cloud and on-premise software revenues, which includesinclude the sale of: new software licenses, revenues earned from granting licenseswhich generally grant to customers a perpetual right to use our database, middleware, applications and industry-specific software productsproducts; cloud SaaS and fees fromPaaS offerings, which grant customers access to a broad range of our software and related support offerings on a subscription basis in a secure, standards-based cloud computing environment; cloud IaaS offerings, which grant customers access to infrastructure cloud services to perform elastic compute, storage and networking services, and also provide management services for software subscriptions offerings,and hardware and related IT infrastructure, both generally on a subscription basis; and software license updates and product support revenues; (2) offerings (described further below);
hardware systems,revenues, which includesinclude the sale of hardware systems products including Oracle Engineered Systems, computer servers, storage products, networking and data center fabric products, and fees from infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) offerings,industry-specific hardware; and hardware systems support revenues;revenues (described further below); and (3)
services revenues, which includesare earned from providing software and hardware related services including consulting, managed cloud servicesadvanced customer support and education revenues. services.
Revenues generally are recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
Revenue Recognition for Software Products and Software Related Services (Software Elements)
New software licenses revenues primarily represent fees earned from granting customers licenses to use our database, middleware, application and applicationsindustry-specific software products and exclude cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS revenues and revenues derived from software license updates, which are included in software license updates and product support revenues. The basis for our new software licenses revenue recognition is substantially governed by the accounting guidance contained in ASC 985-605,Software-Revenue Recognition.We exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of software and software related services revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.
For software license arrangements that do not require significant modification or customization of the underlying software, we recognize new software licenses revenues when: (1) we enter into a legally binding arrangement with a customer for the license of software; (2) we deliver the products; (3) the sale price is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is probable. Revenues that are not recognized at the time of sale because the foregoing conditions are not met, are recognized when those conditions are subsequently met.
Substantially all of our software license arrangements do not include acceptance provisions. However, if acceptance provisions exist as part of public policy for(for example, in agreements with government entities where acceptance periods are required by law, or within previously executed terms and conditions that are referenced in the current agreement and are short-term in nature,nature), we generally recognize revenues upon delivery provided the acceptance terms are perfunctory and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If acceptance provisions are not perfunctory (for example, acceptance provisions that are long-term in nature or are not included as standard terms of an arrangement), revenues are recognized upon the earlier of receipt of written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
The vast majority of our software license arrangements include software license updates and product support contracts, which are entered into at the customer’s option, and the related fees are recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, typically one year. Software license updates provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades, maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Product support includes internet access to technical content, as well as internet and telephone access to technical support personnel. Software license updates and product support contracts are generally priced as a percentage of the net new software licenses fees.fees and are generally invoiced in full at the beginning of the support term. Substantially all of our customers renew their software license updates and product support contracts annually.
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Arrangements—Software Products and Software Related Services (Software Arrangements)
We often enter into arrangements with customers that purchase both software related products and software related services from us at the same time, or within close proximity of one another (referred to as software related multiple-element arrangements). Such software related multiple-element arrangements include the sale of our software products, software license updates and product support contracts and other software related services whereby software license delivery is followed by the subsequent or contemporaneous delivery of the other elements. For those software related multiple-element arrangements, we have applied the residual method to determine the amount of new software license revenues to be recognized pursuant to ASC 985-605. Under the residual method, if fair value exists for undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement, such fair value of the undelivered
elements is deferred with the remaining portion of the arrangement consideration generally recognized upon delivery of the software license or services arrangement.license. We allocate the fair value of each element of a software related multiple-element arrangement based upon its fair value as determined by our vendor specificvendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE—described further below), with any remaining amount allocated to the software license.
Revenue Recognition for Hardware Systems Products, Hardware Systems Related Services, Cloud Software SubscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS Offerings, (NonsoftwareHardware Products, Hardware Support and Related Services (Non-software Elements)
Revenues from the sale of hardware systems products represent amounts earned primarily from the sale of computer servers, storage and networking products. Our revenue recognition policy for these nonsoftware deliverables and other nonsoftwarenon-software deliverables including cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings, hardware systemsproducts, support and related services and cloud software subscriptions offerings is based upon the accounting guidance contained in ASC 605,605-25,Revenue Recognition,Multiple-Element Arrangements, and we exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS revenues, hardware systems products revenues, hardware systemssupport and related services revenues and cloud software subscriptions revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.
Revenues from the sales of our nonsoftwarenon-software elements are recognized when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) we deliver the products and passage of the title to the buyer occurs; (3) the sale price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues that are not recognized at the time of sale because the foregoing conditions are not met are recognized when those conditions are subsequently met. When applicable, we reduce revenues for estimated returns or certain other incentive programs where we have the ability to sufficiently estimate the effects of these items. Where an arrangement is subject to acceptance criteria and the acceptance provisions are not perfunctory (for example, acceptance provisions that are long-term in nature or are not included as standard terms of an arrangement), revenues are recognized upon the earlier of receipt of written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
Our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings generally provide customers access to certain of our software within a cloud-based IT environment that we manage, host and support and offer to customers on a subscription basis. Revenues for our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings are generally recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date the service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our cloud IaaS offerings provide infrastructure cloud services and also include deployment and management offerings for software and hardware and related IT infrastructure. Our cloud IaaS offerings are generally sold on a subscription basis and revenues for these cloud IaaS offerings are generally recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date the service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Revenues from the sale of hardware products represent amounts earned primarily from the sale of our Oracle Engineered Systems, computer servers, storage, networking and industry-specific hardware and are recognized upon the delivery of the hardware product to the customer provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our hardware systems support offerings generally provide customers with software updates for the software components that are essential to the functionality of our server and storagehardware products and can also include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services. Hardware systems support contracts are generally priced as a percentage of the net hardware systems products fees. Hardware systems support contracts are entered into at the customer’s option and are recognized ratably over the contractual term of the arrangements, which areis typically one year.
Our cloud software subscriptions offerings generally provide customers access to certain of our software within a cloud-based IT environment that we manage and offer to customers on a subscription basis. Revenues for our cloud software subscriptions offerings are recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date our service is made available to customers andyear, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our IaaS offerings are on-premise cloud offerings for deploying certain of Oracle’s Engineered Systems and support services to customers on a subscription basis. Customers that enter into IaaS arrangements are also able to purchase additional capacity on demand. Our revenue recognition policy for IaaS offerings is in accordance with ASC 605 and ASC 840,Leases. Substantially all of our IaaS offerings are accounted for as operating leases as our contracts are structured so that the term of the arrangement is less than 75% of the economic life of the equipment and the present value of the minimum fixed payments are less than 90% of the fair market value of the equipment at the inception of the arrangement. Our evaluation of useful life is based on our historical product development cycles and our historical customer hardware upgrade cycles. Capacity on demand is a contingent payment and is therefore excluded from our assessment of the net present value of fixed payments. Revenue for capacity on demand is recognized in the period our customers access additional capacity provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Arrangements—Cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS Offerings, Hardware Systems Products, and Hardware SystemsSupport and Related Services (Nonsoftware(Non-software Arrangements)
We enter into arrangements with customers that purchase both nonsoftwarenon-software related products and services from us at the same time, or within close proximity of one another (referred to as nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements). Each element within a nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangement is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting provided the following criteria are met: the delivered products or services have value to the customer on a standalone basis; and for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered products or services, delivery or performance of the undelivered product or service is considered probable and is substantially controlled by us. We consider a deliverable to have standalone value if the product or service is sold separately by us or another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Further, our revenue arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to the delivered products. Where the aforementioned criteria for a separate unit of
accounting are not met, the deliverable is combined with the undelivered element(s) and treated as a single unit of accounting for the purposes of allocation of the arrangement consideration and revenue recognition. For those units of accounting that include more than one deliverable but are treated as a single unit of accounting, we generally recognize revenues over the delivery period.contractual period of the arrangement, or in the case of our cloud offerings, we generally recognize revenues over the contractual term of the cloud software subscription. For the purposes of revenue classification of the elements that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we allocate revenue to the respective revenue line items within our consolidated statements of operations based on a rational and consistent methodology utilizing our best estimate of relative selling prices of such elements.
For our nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements, we allocate revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy at the arrangement’s inception. The selling price for each element is based upon the following selling price hierarchy: VSOE if available, third partythird-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE are available (a description as to how we determine VSOE, TPE and ESP is provided below). If a tangible hardware systems product includes software, we determine whether the tangible hardware systems product and the software work together to deliver the product’s essential functionality and, if so, the entire product is treated as a nonsoftwarenon-software deliverable. The total arrangement consideration is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the nonsoftwarenon-software deliverables using the relative selling prices of each unit based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. We limit the amount of revenue recognized for delivered elements to an amount that is not contingent upon future delivery of additional products or services or meeting of any specified performance conditions.
When possible, we establish VSOE of selling price for deliverables in software and nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and for software license updates and product support and hardware systems support, based on the renewal rates offered to customers. TPE is established by evaluating similar and interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone arrangements with similarly situated customers. If we are unable to determine the selling price because VSOE or TPE does not exist, we determine ESP for the purposes of allocating the arrangement by reviewing historical transactions, including transactions whereby the deliverable was sold on a standalone basis and considering several other external and internal factors including, but not limited to, pricing practices including discounting, margin objectives, competition, contractually stated prices, the geographies in which we offer our products and services, the type of customer (i.e., distributor, value addedvalue-added reseller, government agency and direct end user, among others) and the stage of the product lifecycle. The determination of ESP is made through consultation with and approval by our management, taking into consideration our pricing model and go-to-market strategy. As our, or our competitors’, pricing and go-to-market strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to our determination of VSOE, TPE and ESP. As a result, our future revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements could differ materially from our results in the current period. Selling prices are analyzed on an annual basis or more frequently if we experience significant changes in our selling prices.
Revenue Recognition Policies Applicable to both Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Arrangements—Arrangements with Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
We also enter into multiple-element arrangements that may include a combination of our various software related and nonsoftwarenon-software related products and services offerings including hardware systems products, hardware systems support, new software licenses, software license updates and product support, cloud software subscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings, hardware products, hardware support, consulting, managed cloudadvanced customer support services and education. In such arrangements, we first allocate the total arrangement consideration based on the relative selling prices of the software group of elements as a whole and to the nonsoftwarenon-software elements. We then further allocate consideration within the software group to the respective elements within that group following the guidance in ASC 985-605 and our policies as described above. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to the elements, we account for each respective element in the arrangement as described above.
Other Revenue Recognition Policies Applicable to Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
Many of our software arrangements include consulting implementation services sold separately under consulting engagement contracts and are included as a part of our services business. Consulting revenues from these arrangements are generally accounted for separately from new software licenses revenues because the arrangements qualify as services transactions as defined in ASC 985-605. The more significant factors considered in determining whether the revenues should be accounted for separately include the nature of services (i.e., consideration of whether the services are essential to the functionality of the licensed product), degree of risk, availability of services from other vendors, timing of payments and impact of milestones or acceptance criteria on the realizability of the software license fee. Revenues for consulting services are generally recognized as the services are performed. If
there is a significant uncertainty about the project completion or receipt of payment for the consulting services, revenues are deferred until the uncertainty is sufficiently resolved. We estimate the proportional performance on contracts with fixed or “not to exceed” fees on a monthly basis utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure progress towards completion, revenues are recognized when we receive final acceptance from the customer that the services have been completed. When total cost estimates exceed revenues, we accrue for the estimated losses immediately using cost estimates that are based upon an average fully burdened daily rate applicable to the consulting organization delivering the services. The complexity of the estimation process and factors relating to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the proportional performance method of accounting affects the amounts of revenues and related expenses reported in our consolidated financial statements. A number of internal and external factors can affect our estimates, including labor rates, utilization and efficiency variances and specification and testing requirement changes.
Our managed cloudadvanced customer support services are offered as standalone arrangements or as a part of arrangements to customers buying newother software licenses or hardware systemsand non-software products and services. Oracle managed cloud services are designed to provide comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services for customers hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities. Additionally, we provideWe offer these advanced support services, both on-premise and remote, to Oracle customers to enable increased performance and higher availability of their products and services. Depending upon the nature of the arrangement, revenues from managed cloudthese services are recognized as the services are performed or ratably over the term of the service period, which is generally one year or less.
Education revenues are also a part of our services business and include instructor-led, media-based and internet-based training in the use of our software and hardware products. Education revenues are recognized as the classes or other education offerings are delivered.
If an arrangement contains multiple elements and does not qualify for separate accounting for the product and service transactions, then new software licenses revenues and/or hardware systems products revenues, including the costs of hardware systems products, are generally recognized together with the services based on contract accounting using either the percentage-of-completion or completed-contract method. Contract accounting is applied to any bundled software, hardware systems and services arrangements: (1) that include milestones or customer specific acceptance criteria that may affect collection of the software license or hardware systems product fees; (2) where consulting services include significant modification or customization of the software or hardware systems product or are of a specialized nature and generally performed only by Oracle; (3) where significant consulting services are provided for in the software license contract or hardware systems product contract without additional charge or are substantially discounted; or (4) where the software license or hardware systems product payment is tied to the performance of consulting services. For the purposes of revenue classification of the elements that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we allocate revenues to software and nonsoftwarenon-software elements based on a rational and consistent methodology utilizing our best estimate of the relative selling price of such elements.
We also evaluate arrangements with governmental entities containing “fiscal funding” or “termination for convenience” provisions, when such provisions are required by law, to determine the probability of possible cancellation. We consider multiple factors, including the history with the customer in similar transactions, the “essential use” of the software or hardware systems products and the planning, budgeting and approval processes undertaken by the governmental entity. If we determine upon execution of these arrangements that the likelihood of cancellation is remote, we then recognize revenues once all of the criteria described above have been met. If such a determination cannot be made, revenues are recognized upon the earlier of cash receipt or approval of the applicable funding provision by the governmental entity.
We assess whether fees are fixed or determinable at the time of sale and recognize revenues if all other revenue recognition requirements are met. Our standard payment terms are net 30 days. However, payment terms may vary based on the country in which the agreement is executed. Payments that are due within six months are generally deemed to be fixed or determinableWe evaluate non-standard payment terms based on ourwhether we have successful collection history on comparable arrangements (based upon similarity of customers, products, and license economics) and, if so, generally conclude such arrangements,payment terms are fixed and determinable and thereby satisfy the required criteria for revenue recognition.
While most of our arrangements for sales within our businesses include short-term payment terms, we have a standard practice of providing long-term financing to creditworthy customers primarily through our financing division. Since fiscal 1989, when our financing division was formed, we have established a history of collection, without concessions, on these receivables with payment terms that generally extend up to five years from the contract date. Provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize new software licenses revenues and hardware systems products revenues for these arrangements upon delivery, net of any payment discounts from financing transactions. We have generally sold receivables financed through our financing division on a non-recourse basis to third partythird-party financing institutions within 90 days of the contracts’ dates of execution and we classify the
proceeds from these sales as cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. We account for the sales of these receivables as “true sales” as defined in ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing, as we are considered to have surrendered control of these financing receivables.
In addition, we enter into arrangements with leasing companies for the sale of our hardware systems products. These leasing companies, in turn, lease our products to end-users. The leasing companies generally have no recourse to us in the event of default by the end-user and we recognize revenue upon delivery, if all the other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Our customers include several of our suppliers and, occasionally, we have purchased goods or services for our operations from these vendors at or about the same time that we have sold our products to these same companies (Concurrent Transactions). Software license agreements, sales of hardware or sales of hardware systemsservices that occur within a three-month time period from the date we have purchased goods or services from that same customer are reviewed for appropriate accounting treatment and disclosure. When we acquire goods or services from a customer, we negotiate the purchase separately from any sales transaction, at terms we consider to be at arm’s length and settle the purchase in cash. We recognize new software licenses revenues or hardware systems product revenues from Concurrent Transactions if all of our revenue recognition criteria are met and the goods and services acquired are necessary for our current operations.
Business Combinations
We apply the provisions of ASC 805,Business Combinations, in the accounting for our acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at theirthe acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as any contingent consideration, where applicable, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.
Accounting for business combinations requires our management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed, restructuring liabilities, pre-acquisition contingencies and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain.
Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are not limited to:
future expected cash flows from software license sales, cloud software subscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS contracts, hardware systems product sales, support agreements, consulting contracts, other customer contracts, acquired developed technologies and patents;
expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products and estimated cash flows from the projects when completed;
the acquired company’s brand and competitive position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will continue to be used in the combined company’s product portfolio; and
discount rates.
Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.
We estimate the fair values of our cloud software subscriptions,SaaS and PaaS, software license updates and product support, and hardware systems support obligations assumed. The estimated fair values of these performance obligations are determined utilizing a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the obligations plus a normal profit margin. The estimated costs to fulfill the obligations are based on the historical direct costs related to providing the services including the correction of any errors in the products acquired. The sum of these costs and operating profit approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to assume the performance obligations. We do not include any costs associated with selling efforts or research and development or the related fulfillment margins on these costs. Profit associated
with any selling efforts is excluded because the acquired entities would have concluded those selling efforts on the performance obligations prior to the acquisition date. We also do not include the estimated research and development costs in our fair value determinations, as these costs are not deemed to represent a legal obligation at the time of acquisition. As a result of our fair value estimates for these obligations, we did not recognize certain cloud SaaS and PaaS, software subscriptions revenues related to cloud software subscriptions contracts in the amount of $45 millionlicense updates and $22 millionproduct support and hardware support revenue amounts that would have been otherwise recorded by the acquired businesses as independent entities in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. We did not recognize software license updates and product support revenues relatedupon delivery of the contractual obligations (refer to support contracts in the amounts of $14 million, $48 million and $80 million that would have been otherwise recorded by the acquired businesses as independent entities in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we did not recognize hardware systems support revenues related“Supplemental Disclosure Related to hardware systems support contracts that would have otherwise been recorded by the acquired businesses as independent entities in the amounts of $14 million, $30 million and $148 millionCertain Charges” below for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.further discussion). Historically, substantially all of our customers, including customers from acquired companies, renew their software license updates and product support contracts when the contracts are eligible for renewal, and we strive to renew cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS contracts and hardware systems support contracts. To the extent cloud software subscriptions, software support or hardware systems support
customers to which these contractual obligations pertain renew these contracts are renewed,with us, we willexpect to recognize the revenues for the full contracts’ values of the contracts over the respective contracts’ periods, which are generally one year in duration.renewal periods.
In connection with a business combination or other strategic initiative, we may estimate costs associated with restructuring plans committed to by our management. Restructuring costs are typically comprised of employee severance costs, costs of consolidating duplicate facilities and contract termination costs. Restructuring expenses are based upon plans that have been committed to by our management, but may be refined in subsequent periods. We account for costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company separately from the business combination pursuant to ASC 420,Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured at its fair value in our consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the liability is incurred. When estimating the fair value of facility restructuring activities, assumptions are applied regarding estimated sub-lease payments to be received, which can differ materially from actual results. This may require us to revise our initial estimates which may materially affect our results of operations and financial position in the period the revision is made.
For a given acquisition, we may identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend our review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether we include these contingencies as a part of the fair value estimates of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and, if so, to determine their estimated amounts.
If we cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, which is generally the case given the nature of such matters, we will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i)(1) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii)(2) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in our estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We reevaluate these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill if identified within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or our final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations and could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets—Impairment Assessments
We review goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 350,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. Effective fiscal 2012,According to ASC 350, we optedcan opt to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment.impairment or we can directly perform the two-step impairment test. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the two steptwo-step impairment test prescribed by ASC 350 will be performed. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the
reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions and the determination of appropriate market comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable
but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. In addition, we make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values for each of our reporting units.
Our most recent annual goodwill impairment analysis, which was performed on March 1, 2013,2016, did not result in a goodwill impairment charge, nor did we record anyrecognize an impairment charge in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $186 million in our hardware products reporting unit (refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information).
Other than our consulting reporting unit, all of our other reporting units had fair values that substantially exceeded their carrying values based on our most recent annual goodwill impairment in fiscal 2012 or 2011.review. Our consulting reporting unit had $1.8 billion of goodwill on March 1, 2016, and hardware systems products reporting units have experienced revenuesrevenue and operating margin declines in fiscal 2013 as compared to prior years.2016. As a result,of our most recent annual goodwill impairment review, our consulting reporting unit’s fair value was 11% in excess of its carrying value. We estimate that should our consulting reporting unit’s projected margins and hardware systems productsrelated cash flows unfavorably deviate from our projections by 20% or more each year, our consulting reporting units may be at greater risk forunit likely would incur a goodwill impairment than our other reporting units if our actual results for these reporting units differ from our projections.loss.
We make judgments about the recoverability of purchased finite lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist. Each period we evaluate the estimated remaining useful lives of purchased intangible assets and whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization. Recoverability of finite lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. We review indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of indefinite lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. If the asset is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
Assumptions and estimates about future values and remaining useful lives of our intangible and other long-lived assets are complex and subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts. Although we believe the historical assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported financial results. We did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of revenue sharing and cost reimbursement arrangements among related entities, the process of identifying items of revenues and expenses that qualify for preferential tax treatment and segregation of foreign and domestic earnings and expenses to avoid double taxation. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, the final tax outcome of these matters could be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period in which such determination is made.
Our effective tax rate includes the impact of certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. Remittances of foreign earnings to the United States are planned based on projected cash flow, working capital and investment needs of our foreign and domestic operations. Based on these assumptions, we estimate the amount that will be distributed to the United States and provide U.S. federal taxes on these amounts. Material changes in our estimates as to how much of our foreign earnings will be distributed to the United States or tax legislation that limits or restricts the amount of undistributed foreign earnings that we consider indefinitely reinvested outside the United States could materially impact our income tax provision and effective tax rate.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In order for us to realize our deferred tax assets, we must be able to generate sufficient taxable income in those jurisdictions where the deferred tax assets are located. We consider future growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate, historical earnings, taxable income in prior years, if carryback is permitted under the law and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination, or goodwill would be
adjusted at our final determination of the valuation allowance related to an acquisition within the measurement period. If we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance as an adjustment to earnings at such time.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are generally recorded in the period when the tax returns are filed and the global tax implications are known, which can materially impact our effective tax rate.
The amount of income tax we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. A description of our accounting policies associated with tax related contingencies assumed as a part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above. For those tax related contingencies that are not a part of a business combination, we account for these uncertain tax issues pursuant to ASC 740,Income Taxes, which contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained in an audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although we believe that we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be given with respect to the final outcome of these matters. We adjust reserves for our uncertain tax positions due to changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit, judicial rulings, and refinement of estimates or realization of earnings or deductions that differ from our estimates. To the extent that the final outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences generally will impact our provision for income taxes in the period in which such a determination is made. Our provisions for income taxes include the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate and also include the related interest and penalties.
In addition, as a part of our accounting for business combinations, intangible assets are recognized at fair values and goodwill is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net estimated fair values of assets acquired. Impairment charges associated with goodwill are generally not tax deductible and will result in an increased effective income tax rate in the period that any impairment is recorded. Amortization expenses associated with acquired intangible assets are generally not tax deductible pursuant to our existing tax structure; however, deferred taxes have been recorded for non-deductible amortization expenses as a part of the accounting for business combinations. We have taken into account the allocation of these identified intangibles among different taxing jurisdictions, including those with nominal or zero percent tax rates, in establishing the related deferred tax liabilities.
Legal and Other Contingencies
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. A description of our accounting policies associated with contingencies assumed as a part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above. For legal and other contingencies that are not a part of a business combination, we accrue a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether the amount of an exposure is reasonably estimable. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time the accruals are made. As
additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock-based awards and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, in accordance with ASC 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires that share-based payments (to the extent they are compensatory) be recognized in our consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, which is generally four years.
We are required to estimate the stock awards that we ultimately expect to vest and to reduce stock-based compensation expense for the effects of estimated forfeitures of awards over the expense recognition period. Although we estimate the rate of future
forfeitures based upon historical experience, actual forfeitures in the future may differ. To the extent our actual forfeitures are different than our estimates, we record a true-up for the difference in the period that the awards vest and such true-ups could materially affect our operating results. Additionally, we also consider on a quarterly basis whether there have been any significant changes in facts and circumstances that would affect our expected forfeiture rate.
We estimate the fair values of employee stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The fair value of an award is affected by our stock price on the date of grant as well as other assumptions including the estimated volatility of our stock price over the term of the awards and the estimated period of time that we expect employees to hold their stock options. The risk-free interest rate assumption we use is based upon U.S. treasury interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the awards. We use the implied volatility of publicly traded options in our stock in order to estimate future stock price trends as we believe that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. In order to determine the estimated period of time that we expect employees to hold their stock options, we have used historical rates of employee groups by seniority of job classification. Our expected dividend rate is based upon an annualized dividend yield based on the per share dividend declared by our Board of Directors. The aforementioned inputs entered into the option valuation model we use to fair value our stock awards are subjective estimates and changes to these estimates will cause the fair values of our stock awards and related stock-based compensation expense that we record to vary.
We record deferred tax assets for stock-based compensation awards that result in deductions on our income tax returns, based on the amount of stock-based compensation recognized and the fair values attributable to the vested portion of stock awards assumed in connection with a business combination, at the statutory tax rate in the jurisdiction in which we will receive a tax deduction. Because the deferred tax assets we record are based upon the stock-based compensation expenses in a particular jurisdiction, the aforementioned inputs that affect the fair values of our stock awards may also indirectly affect our income tax expense. In addition, differences between the deferred tax assets recognized for financial reporting purposes and the actual tax deduction reported on our income tax returns are recorded in additional paid-in capital. If the tax deduction is less than the deferred tax asset, the calculated shortfall reduces our pool of excess tax benefits. If the pool of excess tax benefits is reduced to zero, then subsequent shortfalls would increase our income tax expense.
To the extent we change the terms of our employee stock-based compensation programs, experience market volatility in the pricing of our common stock that increases the implied volatility calculation of publicly traded options in our stock, refine different assumptions in future periods such as forfeiture rates that differ from our current estimates, or assume stock awards from acquired companies that are different in nature than our stock award arrangements, among other potential impacts, the stock-based compensation expense that we record in future periods and the tax benefits that we realize may differ significantly from what we have recorded in previous reporting periods.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices not specifically reviewed, provisions are provided at differing rates, based upon the age of the receivable, the collection history associated with the geographic region that the receivable was recorded and current economic trends. If the historical data that we use to calculate the allowances for doubtful accounts does not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and our future results of operations could be materially affected.
Results of Operations
Impact of Acquisitions
The comparability of our operating results in fiscal 20132016 compared to fiscal 2012 is2015 and in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 was impacted by our acquisitions, primarily our acquisitions of Acme Packet in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, Taleo in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and RightNow during the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
The comparability of our operating results in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 is impacted by our acquisitions, primarily our acquisitions of Taleo in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, RightNow in the third quarter of fiscal 2012, Art Technology Group, Inc. (ATG) in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and Phase Forward Incorporated (Phase Forward) during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
recent acquisitions. In our discussion of changes in our results of operations from fiscal 20132016 compared to fiscal 20122015 and fiscal 20122015 compared to fiscal 2011,2014, we quantifymay qualitatively disclose the contributionsimpact of our acquired products toand services (for the growth in new software licenses and cloud software
subscriptions revenues and software license updates and product support revenues for the one yearone-year period subsequent to the acquisition date. The incremental contributionsdate) to the growth in certain of our acquisitions to our other businesses and operating segments’ revenues where such qualitative discussions would be meaningful for an understanding of the factors that influenced the changes in our results of operations. When material, we may also provide quantitative disclosures related to such acquired products and expenses are not provided as they eitherservices. Expenses for each of the respective period comparisons generally were not separately identifiable due to the integration of these businesses and operating segments into our existing operations, and/or were insignificant to our results of operations during the periods presented.
We caution readers that, while pre- and post-acquisition comparisons, as well as theany quantified amounts themselves, may provide indications of general trends, theany acquisition information that we provide has inherent limitations for the following reasons:
the quantificationsany qualitative and quantitative disclosures cannot specifically address or quantify the substantial effects attributable to changes in business strategies, including our sales force integration efforts. We believe that if our acquired companies had operated independently and sales forces had not been integrated, the relative mix of products and services sold would have been different; and
although substantially all of our on-premise software license customers, including customers from acquired companies, renew their software license updates and product support contracts when the contracts are eligible for renewal, and we strive to renew cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS contracts and hardware systems support contracts, the amounts shown as new software licensescloud SaaS and cloud software subscriptionsPaaS deferred revenues, software license updates and product support deferred revenues, and hardware systems support deferred revenues in our supplemental disclosure related“Supplemental Disclosure Related to certain chargesCertain Charges” (presented below) are not necessarily indicative of revenue improvements we will achieve upon contract renewals to the extent customers do not renew.
Constant Currency Presentation
Our international operations have provided and willare expected to continue to provide a significant portion of each of our totalsegments’ revenues and expenses. As a result, each segment’s revenues and expenses and our total revenues and expenses will continue to be affected by changes in the U.S. Dollar against major international currencies. In order to provide a framework for assessing how our underlying businesses performed excluding the effecteffects of foreign currency fluctuations, we compare the percent change in the results from one period to another period in this Annual Report using constant currency disclosure. To present this information, current and comparative prior period results for entities reporting in currencies other than U.S. Dollars are converted into U.S. Dollars at constant exchange rates (i.e., the rates in effect on May 31, 2012,2015, which was the last day of our prior fiscal year) rather than the actual exchange rates in effect during the respective periods. For example, if an entity reporting in Euros had revenues of 1.0 million Euros from products sold on May 31, 20132016 and May 31, 2012,2015, our financial statements would reflect reported revenues of $1.29$1.12 million in fiscal 20132016 (using 1.291.12 as the month-end average exchange rate for the period) and $1.25$1.08 million in fiscal 20122015 (using 1.251.08 as the month-end average exchange rate for the period). The constant currency presentation, however, would translate the fiscal 20132016 results using the fiscal 20122015 exchange rate and indicate, in this example, no change in revenues during the period. In each of the tables below, we present the percent change based on actual, unrounded results in reported currency and in constant currency.
Total Revenues and Operating Expenses
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | Percent Change | 2012 | Percent Change | 2011 | Percent Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Actual | Constant | Actual | Constant | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 19,719 | 3% | 3% | $ | 19,236 | 5% | 5% | $ | 18,352 | $ | 20,466 | -3% | 0% | $ | 21,107 | 4% | 6% | $ | 20,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA(1) | 11,158 | -3% | 0% | 11,561 | 1% | 1% | 11,497 | 10,881 | -4% | 3% | 11,380 | -5% | 4% | 11,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific(2) | 6,303 | 0% | 3% | 6,324 | 10% | 7% | 5,773 | 5,700 | -1% | 7% | 5,739 | -4% | 1% | 6,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 37,180 | 0% | 2% | 37,121 | 4% | 4% | 35,622 | 37,047 | -3% | 2% | 38,226 | 0% | 4% | 38,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 22,496 | -4% | -2% | 23,415 | -1% | -1% | 23,589 | 24,443 | 0% | 4% | 24,355 | 4% | 7% | 23,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Margin | $ | 14,684 | 7% | 10% | $ | 13,706 | 14% | 14% | $ | 12,033 | $ | 12,604 | -9% | -2% | $ | 13,871 | -6% | 0% | $ | 14,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Margin % | 39% | 37% | 34% | 34% | 36% | 39% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 53% | 52% | 52% | 55% | 55% | 53% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 30% | 31% | 32% | 29% | 30% | 31% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 17% | 17% | 16% | 16% | 15% | 16% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues by Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software | $ | 27,463 | 5% | 7% | $ | 26,116 | 9% | 9% | $ | 24,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware Systems | 5,346 | -15% | -13% | 6,302 | -9% | -10% | 6,944 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud and on-premise software | $ | 28,990 | -2% | 3% | $ | 29,475 | 1% | 5% | $ | 29,199 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware | 4,668 | -10% | -5% | 5,205 | -3% | 2% | 5,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services | 4,371 | -7% | -5% | 4,703 | 1% | 1% | 4,647 | 3,389 | -4% | 2% | 3,546 | -4% | 0% | 3,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 37,180 | 0% | 2% | $ | 37,121 | 4% | 4% | $ | 35,622 | $ | 37,047 | -3% | 2% | $ | 38,226 | 0% | 4% | $ | 38,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software | 74% | 70% | 68% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware Systems | 14% | 17% | 19% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud and on-premise software | 78% | 77% | 76% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware | 13% | 14% | 14% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services | 12% | 13% | 13% | 9% | 9% | 10% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Comprised of Europe, the Middle East and Africa |
| (2) | The Asia Pacific region includes Japan |
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 20122015: : Our results of operations for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 were significantly impacted by movements in international currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar, which decreased our total revenues by 5 percentage points, total operating expenses by 4 percentage points and total operating margin by 7 percentage points.
Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, of 2 percentage points, our total revenues increased in fiscal 20132016 due to an increaseconstant currency growth in our cloud and on-premise software business revenues whichand services business revenues. The constant currency growth in our cloud and on-premise software business revenues during fiscal 2016 was attributable to growth in our software license updates and product support revenues, growth in our SaaS, PaaS and IaaS revenues, and revenue contributions from our recent acquisitions and was partially offset by fiscal 2016 decreases in our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues. ThisThe constant currency increasegrowth in our services business revenues was primarily attributable to our recent acquisitions. These constant currency increases in our revenues during fiscal 2016 were partially offset by reductionsconstant currency decreases in our hardware systems and services business’business revenues. On aIn constant currency, basis, the AmericasEMEA region contributed 77% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 23%approximately equal amounts to our growth infiscal 2016 total revenues during fiscal 2013.growth and the Americas was flat.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, of 2 percentage points,our total operating expenses decreased inincreased during fiscal 20132016 primarily due to a $387 millionincreased sales and marketing and research and development expenses resulting primarily from increased headcount, increased cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS expenses resulting from increased headcount and infrastructure expenses to support the increase in our cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS revenues, higher restructuring expenses that were recorded pursuant to the Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan (2015 Restructuring Plan; see Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report), and higher general and administrative expenses due to higher headcount and higher professional services fees, primarily legal related fees. These constant currency expense increases were partially offset by fiscal 2016 reductions in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets that became fully amortized during fiscal 2016 and lower acquisition related benefitand other expenses, which primarily was attributable to higher expenses during fiscal 2015 as a result of a goodwill impairment loss of $186 million (see Note 27 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information), a $306 million benefit related to certain litigation (see Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information), lower hardware systems products costs associated with lower hardware systems products revenues, and certain other operating expense decreases in most of our other lines of business primarily due to lower variable compensation expenses, lower external contractor expenses and lower amortization of intangible assets. In constant currency, these total expense decreases during fiscal 2013 were partially offset by higher salary and benefit expenses due primarily to additional sales and marketing and research and development headcount added during fiscal 2013..
Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, our total operating margin and our total operating margin as a percentage of total revenues increased duringdecreased in fiscal 2013 due to the increase in2016 as our total revenues and the decrease inexpenses increased at a faster rate than our total operating expenses.revenues.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 20112014: : ExcludingOur results of operations for fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 were significantly impacted by movements in international currencies relative to the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations, the increase inU.S. Dollar, which decreased our total revenues by 4 percentage points, total operating expenses by 3 percentage points and total operating income by 6 percentage points.
Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency variations, our total revenues increased in fiscal 20122015 due to revenue increases in our cloud and on-premise software and hardware businesses. The constant currency growth in our cloud and on-premise software revenues was primarilyattributable to similar reasons as noted above. The constant currency growth in our hardware business was attributable to growth in our software business’hardware support revenues, partially offset by a reduction in
which were primarily attributable to revenue contributions from our hardware systems business’ revenues.acquisitions. Excluding the effecteffects of currency rate fluctuations, the Americas region contributed 65%69%, the EMEA region contributed 8%28% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 27%3% to the growth in our total revenues growth induring fiscal 2012.2015.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency variations, our total operating expenses increased during fiscal 2015 due to expense increases across all of our lines of business, the largest of which were due to increased sales and marketing and research and development expenses resulting primarily from increased headcount, increased cloud SaaS and PaaS expenses to support the increase in our cloud SaaS and PaaS revenues, and increased acquisition related and other expenses that was primarily attributable to the goodwill impairment charge as noted above.
Excluding the effects of unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, total operating expenses decreased slightly inour fiscal 2012 primarily due to reductions in our hardware systems business’ expenses due to efficiencies gained through our hardware systems support integration efforts and lower hardware systems products costs associated with lower hardware systems products revenues; decreases in certain variable compensation expenses; and a reduction in restructuring costs and acquisition related costs primarily associated with expenses incurred in fiscal 2011 related to our acquisition of Sun Microsystems, Inc (Sun). These fiscal 2012 expense decreases were partially offset by fiscal 2012 expense increases in salaries and benefits primarily related to additional sales and marketing headcount and an increase in general and administrative expenses that was primarily due to a $120 million legal expense recovery in fiscal 2011.
Excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations, the increase in total2015 operating margin andwas flat in comparison to the prior year, while our operating margin as a percentage of revenues decreased in fiscal 2012 was due to our increase in total revenues while2015 as our total operating expenses decreased.increased at a faster rate than our total revenues.
Supplemental Disclosure Related to Certain Charges
To supplement our consolidated financial information, we believe the following information is helpful to an overall understanding of our past financial performance and prospects for the future. You should review the introduction under “Impact of Acquisitions” (above) for a discussion of the inherent limitations in comparing pre- and post-acquisition information.
Our operating results included the following business combination accounting adjustments and expenses related to acquisitions, as well as certain other significant expense and income items:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions deferred revenues(1) | $ | 45 | $ | 22 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service deferred revenues(1) | $ | 7 | $ | 12 | $ | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support deferred revenues(1) | 14 | 48 | 80 | 2 | 11 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support deferred revenues(1) | 14 | 30 | 148 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support deferred revenues(1) | 1 | 4 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 2,385 | 2,430 | 2,428 | 1,638 | 2,149 | 2,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other(3)(5) | (604 | ) | 56 | 208 | 42 | 211 | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
Restructuring(4) | 352 | 295 | 487 | 458 | 207 | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation(5) | 722 | 626 | 500 | 1,034 | 928 | 795 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax effects(6) | (896 | ) | (967 | ) | (1,003 | ) | (846 | ) | (971 | ) | (1,091 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,032 | $ | 2,540 | $ | 2,848 | $ | 2,336 | $ | 2,551 | $ | 2,259 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | In connection with our acquisitions, we have estimated the fair values of the cloud |
Represents the amortization of intangible assets, substantially all of which were acquired in connection with our acquisitions. As of May 31, |
Fiscal 2014 | $ | 2,123 | ||
Fiscal 2015 | 1,656 | |||
Fiscal 2016 | 1,094 | |||
Fiscal 2017 | 523 | |||
Fiscal 2018 | 397 | |||
Thereafter | 802 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets subject to amortization | 6,595 | |||
In-process research and development | 45 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 6,640 | ||
|
|
Fiscal 2017 | $ | 1,026 | ||
Fiscal 2018 | 878 | |||
Fiscal 2019 | 770 | |||
Fiscal 2020 | 621 | |||
Fiscal 2021 | 476 | |||
Thereafter | 1,172 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 4,943 | ||
|
|
Acquisition related and other expenses primarily consist of personnel related costs for transitional and certain other employees, stock-based compensation expenses, integration related professional services, certain business combination adjustments including certain adjustments after the measurement period has ended and |
|
Stock-based compensation was included in the following operating expense line items of our consolidated statements of operations (in millions): |
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 147 | $ | 122 | $ | 87 | $ | 220 | $ | 180 | $ | 165 | ||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service | 17 | 10 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service | 4 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | 20 | 18 | 14 | 23 | 21 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems products | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products | 7 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support | 5 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Services | 31 | 23 | 16 | 29 | 30 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 352 | 295 | 231 | 609 | 522 | 385 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 164 | 162 | 145 | 120 | 148 | 171 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 722 | 626 | 500 | 1,034 | 928 | 795 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other | 33 | 33 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation | $ | 755 | $ | 659 | $ | 510 | $ | 1,037 | $ | 933 | $ | 805 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation included in acquisition related and other expenses resulted from unvested stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed from acquisitions whose vesting was accelerated upon termination of the employees pursuant to the terms of those stock options and restricted stock-based awards. |
The income tax effects presented were calculated as if the above described charges were not included in our results of operations for each of the respective periods presented. Income tax effects for fiscal |
Cloud and On-Premise Software Business
Our cloud and on-premise software business consists of our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software segment, our cloud IaaS segment and our software license updates and product support segment.
New Software Licenses and Cloud Software Subscriptions:and On-Premise Software: Our cloud software and on-premise software segment engages in the sale, marketing and delivery of our cloud software offerings, including our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings, and the licensing of our software for on-premise IT environments. Our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings grant customers access to a broad range of our application and platform software technologies on a subscription basis in a secure, standards-based, cloud computing environment that generally includes access, hosting, infrastructure
management, the use of software updates, and support. New software licenses revenues represent fees earned from granting customers licenses to use our database and middleware and our application software products. Cloud software subscriptions revenues represent fees earned from granting customers access to a broad range of our software offerings on a subscription basis in a secure, standards-based cloud computing environment that includes access, hosting, infrastructure management, the use of software updates, and support.products within on-premise IT environments. We continue to place significant emphasis, both domestically and internationally, on direct sales through our own sales force. We also continue to market our products through indirect channels. ExpensesCosts associated with our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenuesand on-premise software segment are included in sales and marketing expenses, whichcloud SaaS and PaaS expenses and amortization of intangible assets. These costs are largely personnel related and include commissions earned by our sales force for the sale of our software offerings, marketing program costs, the cost of providing our cloud software subscriptions servicesSaaS and PaaS offerings and amortization of intangible assets.
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Year Ended May 31, | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | 2012 | Percent Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | Actual | Constant | Actual | Constant | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Software Licenses and Cloud Software Subscriptions Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Software and On-Premise Software Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 5,465 | 7% | 8% | $ | 5,107 | 10% | 11% | $ | 4,662 | $ | 5,204 | -9% | -7% | $ | 5,742 | 4% | 6% | $ | 5,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 2,959 | 3% | 5% | 2,884 | 1% | 4% | 2,861 | 2,629 | -3% | 3% | 2,715 | -16% | -8% | 3,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 1,897 | -1% | 3% | 1,915 | 12% | 11% | 1,712 | 1,650 | 6% | 12% | 1,563 | -10% | -5% | 1,744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 10,321 | 4% | 6% | 9,906 | 7% | 8% | 9,235 | 9,483 | -5% | -1% | 10,020 | -5% | 0% | 10,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service(1) | 1,135 | 49% | 53% | 763 | 71% | 76% | 447 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing(1) | 6,252 | 6% | 8% | 5,899 | 8% | 8% | 5,455 | 6,690 | 3% | 9% | 6,474 | 2% | 6% | 6,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 142 | 19% | 19% | 120 | 43% | 43% | 84 | 223 | 24% | 24% | 179 | 8% | 8% | 166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 986 | 20% | 20% | 822 | 1% | 1% | 811 | 826 | -18% | -18% | 1,008 | 3% | 3% | 977 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 7,380 | 8% | 10% | 6,841 | 8% | 8% | 6,350 | 8,874 | 5% | 10% | 8,424 | 6% | 10% | 7,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin | $ | 2,941 | -4% | -3% | $ | 3,065 | 6% | 10% | $ | 2,885 | $ | 609 | -62% | -59% | $ | 1,596 | -39% | -31% | $ | 2,597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin % | 28% | 31% | 31% | 6% | 16% | 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 53% | 52% | 50% | 55% | 57% | 53% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 29% | 29% | 31% | 28% | 27% | 31% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 18% | 19% | 19% | 17% | 16% | 16% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues by Software Offerings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service | $ | 2,207 | 49% | 52% | $ | 1,485 | 32% | 35% | $ | 1,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses | 7,276 | -15% | -11% | 8,535 | -9% | -4% | 9,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cloud software and on-premise software revenues | $ | 9,483 | -5% | -1% | $ | 10,020 | -5% | 0% | $ | 10,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Software Offerings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service | 23% | 15% | 11% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses | 77% | 85% | 89% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 24 percentage points, total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues increased by 6% during fiscal 2013 due to growth across all regions and incremental revenues from our acquisitions. Oncloud software and on-premise software segment decreased by 1 percentage point during fiscal 2016 due to a constant currency basis, the Americas contributed 69%, EMEA contributed 23% and Asia Pacific contributed 8% to the increasereduction in new software licenses revenues, partially offset by an increase in cloud SaaS and PaaS revenues and incremental revenue contributions from our recent acquisitions. The increase in our cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS revenues during fiscal 2013.
In reported currency,and decrease in our new software licenses revenues during fiscal 2016 were $9.4 billionprimarily due to the strategic emphasis placed on selling, marketing and $9.5 billion in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. In reported currency,growing our cloud software subscriptions revenues were $910 millionofferings and $455 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively.we expect these revenue trends will continue. In constant currency, our new software licenses revenues and our cloud software subscriptions revenues increased by 1% and 100%, respectively, in fiscal 2013 primarily due to incremental revenues from our acquisitions.
In reported currency, our recent acquisitions contributed $476 million of growth to our total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues during fiscal 2013.
As a result of our acquisitions, we recorded adjustments to reduce assumed cloud software subscriptions obligations to their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. Due to our application of business combination accounting rules, cloud software subscriptions revenues2016 revenue declines in the amounts of $45 millionAmericas region were partially offset by revenues growth in the EMEA and $22 million that would have been otherwise recorded by our acquired businesses as independent entities were not recognized in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. To the extent underlying cloud software subscriptions contracts are renewed with us following an acquisition, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of the cloud software subscriptions contracts over the respective contractual periods.Asia Pacific regions.
In reported currency, new software licenses revenues earned from transactions of $3 million or greater increaseddecreased by 11%24% in fiscal 20132016 and represented 29%28% of our total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues in fiscal 20132016 in comparison to 27%31% in fiscal 2012.2015.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency rate fluctuations of 25 percentage points, total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software expenses increased induring fiscal 20132016 primarily due to higher employee related expenses and stock-based compensation from increased headcount and higher intangible asset amortization,cloud SaaS and PaaS expenses incurred to support the related revenues increase. These fiscal 2016 constant currency expense increases were partially offset by a decreasereduction in expenses associated with certain legal costs.of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.
Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations, total new software licenses andour cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software segment’s total margin and total margin as a percentage of revenues decreased in fiscal 2013 as2016 due primarily to growth in our total expenses increased at a faster rate than our total revenues for this operating segment.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: Excluding the effecteffects of foreignunfavorable currency rate fluctuations, total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software revenues increasedwere flat during fiscal 2015 as growth in fiscal 2012 due to growth across all major regionsour cloud SaaS and product typesPaaS revenues and due to incremental revenuescontributions from our acquisitions. Onacquisitions were offset by a constant currency basis, the Americas contributed 63%, EMEA contributed 13%, and Asia Pacific contributed 24% todecline in our new software licenses revenues. Similar to the fiscal 2016 trend noted above, the increase in our cloud SaaS and cloud software subscriptionsPaaS revenues growth during fiscal 2012.
In reported currency,and decrease in our new software licenses revenues during fiscal 2015 were $9.5 billionprimarily due to the strategic emphasis placed on selling, marketing and $9.0 billion in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. In reported currency,growing our cloud software subscriptions revenues were $455 million and $255 million in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.offerings. In constant currency, new software licenses revenuesfiscal 2015 revenue growth in the Americas region was offset by revenue declines in the EMEA and cloud software subscriptions revenues increased in fiscal 2012 primarily due to improved customer demand for our products, our sales force’s execution and incremental revenues from our acquisitions.
In reported currency, our recent acquisitions contributed $317 million of growth to our total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues during fiscal 2012. As described above, the amount of new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues that we recognized in fiscal 2012 was affected by business combination accounting rules.Asia Pacific regions.
In reported currency, new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues earned from transactions of $3 million or greater increaseddecreased by 4%15% in fiscal 20122015 and represented 27%31% of our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues in fiscal 20122015 in comparison to 28%33% in fiscal 2011.2014.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency rate fluctuations, our total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software expenses increased in fiscal 20122015 primarily due to higher employee related expenses from increased headcount.headcount, higher variable compensation expenses, and higher cloud SaaS and PaaS expenses incurred to support the related revenues increase.
Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable foreign currency rate fluctuations, new software licenses andour cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software segment’s total margin increased due to the increase in revenues, and new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionstotal margin as a percentage of revenues was flatdecreased in fiscal 2015 due primarily to the growth in our total expenses during fiscal 2015 for this operating segment.
Cloud Infrastructure as a Service: Our cloud IaaS segment provides infrastructure cloud services that are enterprise-grade, hosted and supported within the Oracle Cloud to perform elastic compute, storage and networking services on a subscription basis. Our cloud IaaS segment also offers Oracle Managed Cloud Services, which are comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services for customer IT infrastructure for a fee for a stated term that are hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities. Cloud IaaS expenses consist primarily of personnel related expenditures, technology infrastructure expenditures and facilities costs. Operating expenses associated with our IaaS offerings also include sales and marketing expenses, which are largely personnel related, and amortization of intangible assets. For all periods presented, our cloud IaaS segment’s revenues and expenses were substantially attributable to our Oracle Managed Cloud Services offerings.
(Dollars in millions) Cloud Infrastructure as a Service Revenues: Americas EMEA Asia Pacific Total revenues Expenses: Cloud infrastructure as a service(1) Sales and marketing(1) Stock-based compensation Amortization of intangible assets(2) Total expenses Total Margin Total Margin % % Revenues by Geography: Americas EMEA Asia Pacific Year Ended May 31, Percent Change Percent Change 2016 Actual Constant 2015 Actual Constant 2014 $ 470 6% 9% $ 444 33% 35% $ 335 139 7% 14% 129 37% 41% 94 37 7% 21% 35 28% 39% 27 646 6% 11% 608 33% 36% 456 362 6% 10% 339 12% 14% 304 76 -16% -14% 90 46% 50% 61 5 -2% -2% 5 27% 27% 4 5 34% 34% 4 * * — 448 2% 5% 438 19% 21% 369 $ 198 17% 24% $ 170 97% 103% $ 87 31% 28% 19% 73% 73% 73% 21% 21% 21% 6% 6% 6%
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
| * | Not meaningful |
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015: Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 5 percentage points, total cloud IaaS revenues increased during fiscal 2016 due to growth in our Oracle Managed Cloud Services offerings and incremental revenue contributions from our recent acquisitions. Excluding the effects of currency rate fluctuations, the Americas region contributed 62%, the EMEA region contributed 27% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 11% to the increase in cloud IaaS revenues during fiscal 2016.
On a constant currency basis, total cloud IaaS expenses increased during fiscal 2016 primarily due to increased infrastructure expenses to support our increase in cloud IaaS revenues.
Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency exchange variances, total margin and margin as a percentage of revenues increased in fiscal 2016 as total revenues increased at a faster rate than our total expenses for this operating segment.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014: On a constant currency basis, total cloud IaaS revenues increased during fiscal 2015 primarily due to contributions from our acquisitions. Excluding the sameeffects of currency rate fluctuations, the Americas region contributed 70%, the EMEA region contributed 24% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 6% to the increase in cloud IaaS revenues during fiscal 2015.
On a constant currency basis, total cloud IaaS expenses increased in fiscal 2015 primarily due to increased employee related expenses associated with increased headcount and increased infrastructure expenses to support our increase in IaaS revenues.
Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency exchange variances, total margin and margin as a percentage of revenues increased in fiscal 2015 as total revenues increased at a faster rate than our total expenses for this operating expenses.segment.
Software License Updates and Product Support:Software license updates and product support revenues are typically generated through the sale of software support contracts related to on-premise new software licenses purchased by our customers. Our software license updates and product support offerings include software license updates, which grant on-premise software customers rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases and patches released during the support period. Productperiod, and product support includesincluding internet access to
technical content as well as internet and telephone access to technical support personnel in our global support centers. Expenses associated with our software license updates and product support line of business include the cost of providing the support services, largely personnel related expenses, and the amortization of our intangible assets associated with software support contracts and customer relationships obtained from acquisitions.
(Dollars in millions) | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | 2012 | Percent Change | �� | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 9,322 | 7% | 8% | $ | 8,672 | 9% | 9% | $ | 7,963 | $ | 10,672 | 2% | 5% | $ | 10,418 | 6% | 7% | $ | 9,858 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 5,363 | 3% | 7% | 5,194 | 8% | 8% | 4,802 | 5,703 | -4% | 5% | 5,920 | 0% | 9% | 5,906 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 2,457 | 5% | 9% | 2,344 | 15% | 12% | 2,031 | 2,486 | -1% | 7% | 2,509 | 3% | 8% | 2,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 17,142 | 6% | 8% | 16,210 | 10% | 9% | 14,796 | 18,861 | 0% | 5% | 18,847 | 4% | 8% | 18,206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support(1) | 1,155 | -4% | -2% | 1,208 | -3% | -3% | 1,250 | 1,123 | -5% | 1% | 1,178 | 3% | 8% | 1,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 20 | 12% | 12% | 18 | 27% | 27% | 14 | 23 | 11% | 11% | 21 | -7% | -7% | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 836 | -3% | -3% | 863 | 4% | 4% | 827 | 504 | -32% | -32% | 741 | -7% | -7% | 801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 2,011 | -4% | -2% | 2,089 | 0% | 0% | 2,091 | 1,650 | -15% | -12% | 1,940 | -1% | 2% | 1,963 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin | $ | 15,131 | 7% | 10% | $ | 14,121 | 11% | 11% | $ | 12,705 | $ | 17,211 | 2% | 7% | $ | 16,907 | 4% | 9% | $ | 16,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin % | 88% | 87% | 86% | 91% | 90% | 89% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 55% | 54% | 54% | 57% | 55% | 54% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 31% | 32% | 32% | 30% | 32% | 33% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 14% | 14% | 14% | 13% | 13% | 13% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 5 percentage points, software license updates and product support revenues increased induring fiscal 20132016 as a result of new software licenses sold (with substantially all customers electing to purchase software support contracts)contracts in conjunction with their new software licenses purchased during the trailing 4-quarter period, and due to the renewal of substantially all of the software support customer base eligible for renewal induring the current fiscal yeartrailing 4-quarter period and incremental revenues from our recent acquisitions. Excluding the effecteffects of currency rate fluctuations, the Americas region contributed 56%, the EMEA region contributed 29%26% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 15%18% to the increase in software license updates and product support revenues.
In reported currency, software license updates and product support revenues induring fiscal 2013 included incremental revenues of $49 million from our recently acquired companies. As a result of our acquisitions, we recorded adjustments to reduce assumed software support obligations to their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. Due to our application of business combination accounting rules, software license updates and product support revenues related to software support contracts in the amounts of $14 million, $48 million and $80 million that would have been otherwise recorded by our acquired businesses as independent entities were not recognized in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Historically, substantially all of our customers, including customers from acquired companies, renew their software support contracts when such contracts are eligible for renewal. To the extent these underlying support contracts are renewed, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of these contracts over the respective support periods, the substantial majority of which are one year in duration.2016.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable foreign currency rate fluctuations of 3 percentage points, total software license updates and product support expenses decreased during fiscal 2016 primarily due to lower amortization of intangible assets, a reduction in expenses associated with certain non-income based taxes, lower bad debt expenses, and lower variable compensation expenses.of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total software license updates and product support margin and margin as a percentage of revenues increased as ourin fiscal 2016 due to the growth in total revenues and the decrease in total expenses for this segment increased while our total expenses decreased.segment.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 4 percentage points, software license updates and product support revenues increased induring fiscal 2012 for2015 relative to fiscal 2014 due to similar reasons as those noted above for ourthe fiscal 2013 revenues2016 increase.
In reported Excluding the effects of currency rate fluctuations, the Americas region contributed 50%, the EMEA region contributed 36% and the Asia Pacific region contributed 14% to the increase in software license updates and product support revenues induring fiscal 2012 included incremental revenues of $83 million from our recently acquired companies. As described above, the amounts of software license updates and product support revenues that we recognized in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 were affected by business combination accounting rules.2015.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable foreign currency rate fluctuations of 3 percentage points, total software license updates and product support expenses were flat inincreased during fiscal 2012 as an increase in intangible asset amortization2015 due to higher employee related expenses and increased salaries expenses fromfacilities costs associated with increased headcount that was primarily attributable to acquisitions, and also due to
higher bad debt expenses. These fiscal 2015 expense increases were partially offset by reductionsfiscal 2015 expense decreases related to lower statutory obligation expenses in variable compensation expenses, bad debt expensesthe jurisdictions in which we operate and certain other operating expenses.lower amortization of intangible assets.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total software license updates and product support margin and margin as a percentage of total revenues for this segment increased in fiscal 20122015 as our total revenues increased whileat a faster rate than our total expenses remained flat.for this segment.
Hardware Systems Business
Our hardware systems business consists of our hardware systems products segment and hardware systems support segment.
Hardware Systems Products:Hardware systems products revenues are primarily generated from the sales of our Oracle Engineered Systems, computer server, storage, networking, workstations and networking products, including sales of our Oracle Engineered Systems.related devices and industry-specific hardware products. We market and sell our hardware systems products through our direct sales force and indirect channels such as independent distributors and value addedvalue-added resellers. Operating expenses associated with our hardware systems products include the cost of hardware systems products, which consists of expenses for materials and labor used to produce these products by our internal manufacturing operations or by third partythird-party manufacturers, warranty expenses and the impact of periodic changes in inventory valuation, including the impact of inventory determined to be excess and obsolete. Operating expenses associated with our hardware systems products also include sales and marketing expenses, which are largely personnel related and include variable compensation earned by our sales force for the sales of our hardware products, and amortization of intangible assets.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | 2012 | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware Systems Products Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware Products Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 1,495 | -20% | -20% | $ | 1,880 | -16% | -16% | $ | 2,248 | $ | 1,241 | -17% | -13% | $ | 1,492 | -1% | 1% | $ | 1,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 842 | -26% | -23% | 1,140 | -15% | -16% | 1,337 | 721 | -10% | -1% | 797 | -5% | 7% | 834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 696 | -14% | -12% | 807 | 1% | -3% | 797 | 509 | -5% | 1% | 536 | -16% | -12% | 635 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 3,033 | -21% | -19% | 3,827 | -13% | -14% | 4,382 | 2,471 | -13% | -7% | 2,825 | -5% | 0% | 2,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems products(1) | 1,498 | -19% | -17% | 1,842 | -10% | -10% | 2,055 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products(1) | 1,364 | -7% | -1% | 1,465 | -3% | 3% | 1,516 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing(1) | 929 | -16% | -14% | 1,106 | 7% | 6% | 1,037 | 898 | -1% | 6% | 911 | -8% | -3% | 991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 8 | 211% | 211% | 3 | -57% | -57% | 5 | 20 | 17% | 17% | 17 | 47% | 47% | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 327 | -17% | -17% | 393 | -8% | -8% | 426 | 149 | -33% | -33% | 223 | -19% | -19% | 274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 2,762 | -17% | -16% | 3,344 | -5% | -5% | 3,523 | 2,431 | -7% | -1% | 2,616 | -6% | -1% | 2,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin | $ | 271 | -44% | -42% | $ | 483 | -44% | -46% | $ | 859 | $ | 40 | -81% | -80% | $ | 209 | 14% | 19% | $ | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin % | 9% | 13% | 20% | 2% | 7% | 6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 49% | 49% | 51% | 50% | 53% | 51% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 28% | 30% | 31% | 29% | 28% | 28% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 23% | 21% | 18% | 21% | 19% | 21% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015: Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 6 percentage points, total hardware products revenues decreased during fiscal 2016 due to reductions in sales volumes of certain of our product lines, including lower margin products. This decrease was partially offset by incremental revenues during the first quarter of fiscal 2016 from our recently acquired companies, primarily MICROS. On a constant currency basis, fiscal 2016 total hardware products revenues declines in the Americas and EMEA regions were partially offset by slight growth in the Asia Pacific region.
Excluding the effects of favorable currency rate fluctuations of 6 percentage points, total hardware products expenses decreased in fiscal 2016 due to lower hardware products costs associated with lower hardware products revenues, and due to a reduction in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.
In constant currency, total margin and total margin as a percentage of revenues decreased in fiscal 2016 for this segment due to the decrease in our total revenues.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014: Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations, total hardware products revenues were flat in fiscal 2015 as revenues from acquired companies, including MICROS, and increases in hardware revenues attributable to our Oracle Engineered Systems products were offset by reductions in the sales volumes of certain of our other hardware product offerings. On a constant currency basis, revenue increases in the Americas and EMEA regions were offset by revenue declines in the Asia Pacific region during fiscal 2015.
Excluding the effects of favorable currency rate fluctuations, total hardware products expenses decreased in fiscal 2015 primarily due to lower bad debt expenses and a reduction in amortization of intangible assets. These fiscal 2015 expense decreases were partially offset by higher fiscal 2015 employee related expenses due to increased headcount from our acquisitions and higher direct product costs that were primarily attributable to acquired products revenues.
In constant currency, total margin and margin as a percentage of revenues increased in fiscal 2015 due to the decrease in total expenses for this segment.
Hardware Support: Our hardware support offerings provide customers with software updates for software components that are essential to the functionality of our hardware products, such as Oracle Solaris and certain other software products, and can include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services. Expenses associated with our hardware support operating segment include the cost of materials used to repair customer products, the cost of providing support services, largely personnel related expenses, and the amortization of our intangible assets primarily associated with hardware support contracts and customer relationships obtained from our acquisitions.
(Dollars in millions) Hardware Support Revenues: Americas EMEA Asia Pacific Total revenues Expenses: Hardware support(1) Stock-based compensation Amortization of intangible assets(2) Total expenses Total Margin Total Margin % % Revenues by Geography: Americas EMEA Asia Pacific Year Ended May 31, Percent Change Percent Change 2016 Actual Constant 2015 Actual Constant 2014 $ 1,163 -7% -4% $ 1,245 1% 3% $ 1,229 656 -9% -1% 722 -2% 6% 738 378 -9% -1% 413 -4% 1% 429 2,197 -8% -3% 2,380 -1% 4% 2,396 688 -15% -10% 810 -2% 2% 830 5 -17% -17% 6 3% 3% 6 146 -8% -8% 158 -32% -32% 231 839 -14% -10% 974 -9% -6% 1,067 $ 1,358 -3% 3% $ 1,406 6% 11% $ 1,329 62% 59% 55% 53% 52% 51% 30% 30% 31% 17% 18% 18%
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: On a constant currency basis, hardware systems products revenues decreased in fiscal 2013 primarily due to reductions in the sales volumes of certain of our legacy product lines, including lower margin products. These revenue decreases were partially offset by increases in hardware revenues attributable to our Oracle Engineered Systems.
On a constant currency basis, total hardware systems products operating expenses declined in fiscal 2013 primarily due to a reduction in hardware systems products costs associated with lower hardware revenues, a decrease in employee related expenses due to decreased hardware systems sales headcount, and lower intangible asset amortization.
Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations totalof 5 percentage points, hardware systems products margin and margin as a percentage of revenues decreased in fiscal 2013 as our total revenues for this segment decreased at a faster rate than our total expenses.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: Excluding the effect of currency rate fluctuations, hardware systems products revenues decreased in fiscal 2012 for similar reasons as those noted above for our fiscal 2013 revenues decrease.
Excluding the effect of currency rate fluctuations, total hardware systems products operating expenses declined in fiscal 2012 primarily due to reductions in hardware systems products costs associated with lower revenues, lower intangible asset amortization, and decreases in bad debt expenses, which were partially offset by increased employee related expenses.
Excluding the effect of currency rate fluctuations, total hardware systems products margin and total margin as a percentage of revenues decreased in fiscal 2012 primarily due to the decrease in hardware systems products revenues and increase in hardware sales and marketing expenses.
Hardware Systems Support: Our hardware systems support offerings provide customers with software updates for software components that are essential to the functionality of our server and storage products, such as Oracle Solaris and certain other software products, and can include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services. Expenses associated with our hardware systems support operating segment include the cost of materials used to repair customer products, the cost of providing support services, largely personnel related expenses, and the amortization of our intangible assets associated with hardware systems support contracts and customer relationships obtained from our acquisitions.
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | 2012 | Percent Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | Actual | Constant | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware Systems Support Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 1,109 | -4% | -4% | $ | 1,157 | 5% | 5% | $ | 1,103 | ||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 752 | -14% | -10% | 870 | -13% | -14% | 1,004 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 452 | 1% | 4% | 448 | -2% | -5% | 455 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 2,313 | -7% | -4% | 2,475 | -3% | -4% | 2,562 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support(1) | 885 | -15% | -13% | 1,041 | -17% | -18% | 1,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 5 | -3% | -3% | 5 | 1% | 1% | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 213 | -30% | -30% | 305 | 2% | 2% | 298 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 1,103 | -18% | -17% | 1,351 | -13% | -14% | 1,557 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin | $ | 1,210 | 8% | 11% | $ | 1,124 | 12% | 10% | $ | 1,005 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin % | 52% | 45% | 39% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 48% | 47% | 43% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 32% | 35% | 39% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 20% | 18% | 18% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012: Excluding the impact of currency rate fluctuations, hardware systems support revenues decreased in fiscal 2013 primarily2016 due to reductions in sales volumes of certain of our legacy hardware systems product lines for which we offer our hardware systems support,support. This decrease was partially offset by incremental revenues from our acquisitions.
As a resultduring the first quarter of our acquisitions, we recorded adjustments to reduce assumed hardware systems support obligations to their estimated fair values at the acquisition dates. Duefiscal 2016 that were primarily related to our applicationacquisition of business combination accounting rules,MICROS. On a constant currency basis, the decrease in total hardware systems support revenues relatedwas attributable to hardware systems support contractsrevenue declines in the amounts of $14 million, $30 million and $148 million that would have been otherwise reported by our acquired businesses as independent entities were not recognized inall regions during fiscal 2013, 2012 and
2011, respectively. To the extent these underlying hardware systems support contracts are renewed, we will recognize the revenues for the full values of these contracts over the future support periods.2016.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency rate fluctuations of 4 percentage points, total hardware systems support expenses decreased in fiscal 20132016 primarily due to reductions in employee related and other expenses from reduced headcount and reduced external contractor costs as we integrated MICROS into our operations, due to a decrease in bad debt expenses, and due to a reduction in employee related expenses attributable to decreased headcount, reduced service delivery costs due to operational initiatives, lower bad debt expenses, and lower amortizationassociated with certain of our intangible assets.assets that became fully amortized during fiscal 2016.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total hardware systems support margin and margin as a percentage of total revenues increased in fiscal 20132016 due to the reduction in our total hardware systems support expenses.expense reductions for this segment.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations, hardware systems support revenues decreasedincreased in fiscal 2012 for similar reasons as those noted above for our fiscal 20132015 primarily due to incremental revenues decreases. Regionally, revenue decreases infrom acquired companies, primarily MICROS. The Americas region contributed 42%, the EMEA region contributed 52% and the Asia Pacific regions were partially offset by higher revenuesregion contributed 6% to the increase in the Americas. As described above, the amounts of hardware systems support revenues that we recognized induring fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 were affected by business combination accounting rules.2015.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total hardware systems support expenses decreased in fiscal 20122015 primarily due to the reduction ofreduced service delivery costs during fiscal 2012due to operational initiatives and a decrease in amortization of intangible assets, partially offset by higher employee related expenses resulting from increased headcount from our integration initiatives associated with our acquisition of Sun.acquisitions, higher external contractor expenses and higher bad debt expenses.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total hardware systems support margin and margin as a percentage of total revenues increased in fiscal 2012 as a result of our expense reductions2015 due to the increase in total revenues and decrease in total expenses for this operating segment.
Services Business
Our services business consists of consulting, managed cloudadvanced customer support services and education services. Consulting revenues are earned by providing services to customers in business and IT strategy alignment, enterprise architecture planning and design, initial productsoftware implementation and integration, and ongoing productsoftware enhancements and upgrades. Managed cloud services revenues are earned by providing comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services—including deployment, management, monitoring, patching, security and upgrade services—for customers hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise atAdvanced customer facilities. Additionally, we provide support services bothare provided on-premise and remote,remotely to our customers to enable increased performance and higher availability of their Oracle products and services and also include certain other services. Education revenues are earned by providing instructor-led, media-based, internet-basedlive virtual training, self-paced online training, private events and custom training in the use of our cloud, on-premise software and hardware products.offerings. The cost of providing our services consists primarily of personnel related expenses, technology infrastructure expenditures, facilities expenses and external contractor expenses.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | $ | 2,328 | -4% | -3% | $ | 2,420 | 2% | 2% | $ | 2,376 | $ | 1,716 | -3% | 1% | $ | 1,766 | -5% | -2% | $ | 1,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 1,242 | -16% | -12% | 1,473 | -1% | -1% | 1,493 | 1,033 | -6% | 2% | 1,097 | -2% | 6% | 1,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 801 | -1% | 4% | 810 | 4% | 3% | 778 | 640 | -6% | 1% | 683 | -6% | -1% | 729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 4,371 | -7% | -5% | 4,703 | 1% | 1% | 4,647 | 3,389 | -4% | 2% | 3,546 | -4% | 0% | 3,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services(1) | 3,516 | -5% | -3% | 3,720 | -2% | -2% | 3,802 | 2,722 | -6% | 0% | 2,899 | -1% | 4% | 2,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 31 | 36% | 36% | 23 | 39% | 39% | 16 | 29 | -6% | -6% | 30 | 2% | 2% | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(2) | 23 | -52% | -52% | 47 | -27% | -27% | 66 | 8 | -47% | -47% | 15 | -12% | -12% | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 3,570 | -6% | -3% | 3,790 | -2% | -2% | 3,884 | 2,759 | -6% | -1% | 2,944 | -1% | 4% | 2,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin | $ | 801 | -12% | -10% | $ | 913 | 20% | 19% | $ | 763 | $ | 630 | 5% | 12% | $ | 602 | -18% | -13% | $ | 733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Margin % | 18% | 19% | 16% | 19% | 17% | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% Revenues by Geography: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 53% | 52% | 51% | 51% | 50% | 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA | 29% | 31% | 32% | 30% | 31% | 30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific | 18% | 17% | 17% | 19% | 19% | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
| (2) | Included as a component of ‘Amortization of Intangible Assets’ in our consolidated statements of operations |
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Excluding the effecteffects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations of 6 percentage points, our total services revenues decreased inincreased during fiscal 20132016 due primarily to revenue decreasesincreases in eachour advanced customer support segment of our services segments. The largest services revenues decrease in fiscal 2013which the majority of the growth was attributable to our consulting segment’s revenues, which were primarily impacted by weaker demand inrecent acquisitions. In constant currency, the Americas contributed 44%, EMEA due to weaker economic conditionscontributed 44% and which also experienced higher revenues in the Asia Pacific region.contributed 12% to the fiscal 2016 growth in our total services revenues.
Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency rate fluctuations of 5 percentage points, our total services expenses decreased duringdeclined slightly in fiscal 20132016 due to reduced expenses in our consulting and education segments, which were partially offset by modest expense growth in our advanced customer services segment primarily due to expense decreases across all of our services segments, which consisted primarily of decreases in external contractor costs, lower variable compensation expenses, and lower intangible asset amortization.recent acquisitions.
Excluding the effect ofIn constant currency, rate fluctuations, total services margin and total margin as a percentage of total services revenues decreased duringincreased in fiscal 2013 as2016 due to the increase in total revenues and decrease in total expenses.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014: Excluding the effects of unfavorable currency rate fluctuations, our total services revenues declined at a faster rate thanwere flat in fiscal 2015 as incremental revenues from acquired companies, including MICROS, and an increase in fiscal 2015 advanced customer services revenues were offset by declines in our total services expenses.fiscal 2015 consulting and education revenues. In constant currency, revenues growth in the EMEA region was offset by revenue declines in the Americas and Asia Pacific regions during fiscal 2015.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011:Excluding the effecteffects of favorable currency rate fluctuations, our total services revenuesexpenses increased modestly induring fiscal 20122015 due to higher employee related expenses resulting from increased revenuesheadcount from our consultingacquisitions and managed cloud services segments including incremental contributions from our recently acquired companies, which were partially offset by decreases in our education revenues.lower variable compensation and lower external contractor costs.
On aIn constant currency, basis, our services expenses decreased during fiscal 2012 due to lower third-party contractor expenses associated with our managed cloud services offerings, lower intangible asset amortization and certain other net expense reductions.
Excluding the effect of currency rate fluctuations, total services margin and total margin as a percentage of total revenues increased duringdecreased in fiscal 2012 as our2015 due to the increase in total services revenues increased while our total services expenses decreased.for this business.
Research and Development Expenses: Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel related expenditures. We intend to continue to invest significantly in our research and development efforts because, in our judgment, they are essential to maintaining our competitive position.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development(1) | $ | 4,498 | 6% | 8% | $ | 4,228 | -1% | -1% | $ | 4,288 | $ | 5,178 | 4% | 5% | $ | 5,002 | 5% | 6% | $ | 4,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 352 | 19% | 19% | 295 | 28% | 28% | 231 | 609 | 17% | 17% | 522 | 36% | 36% | 385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | $ | 4,850 | 7% | 8% | $ | 4,523 | 0% | 1% | $ | 4,519 | $ | 5,787 | 5% | 7% | $ | 5,524 | 7% | 8% | $ | 5,151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Total Revenues | 13% | 12% | 13% | 16% | 14% | 13% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012:On a constant currency basis, total research and development expenses increased during fiscal 20132016 and fiscal 2015, each relative to the corresponding prior fiscal year, primarily due to an increase inincreased employee related expenses including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensationresulting from increased headcount, including additional headcount from our acquisitions, and was partially offset by lower variable compensationalso due to increased infrastructure expenses.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: On a constant currency basis, total research and development expenses increased slightly during fiscal 2012 primarily as a result of an increase in employee related expenses such as salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation from increased headcount, which was partially offset by a decrease in variable compensation expenses and a decrease in certain legal costs.
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel related expenditures for information technology,IT, finance, legal and human resources support functions.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative(1) | $ | 908 | -6% | -4% | $ | 964 | 17% | 17% | $ | 825 | $ | 1,035 | 11% | 16% | $ | 929 | 7% | 10% | $ | 867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 164 | 2% | 2% | 162 | 12% | 12% | 145 | 120 | -19% | -19% | 148 | -14% | -14% | 171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | $ | 1,072 | -5% | -3% | $ | 1,126 | 16% | 16% | $ | 970 | $ | 1,155 | 7% | 11% | $ | 1,077 | 4% | 7% | $ | 1,038 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Total Revenues | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excluding stock-based compensation |
Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012: On a constant currency basis, total general and administrative expenses decreased in fiscal 2013 primarily due to a decrease in professional fees and lower variable compensation expenses, partially offset by slightly higher salaries and benefits expenses due to a modest increase in headcount.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011:On a constant currency basis, total general and administrative expenses increased induring fiscal 20122016 and fiscal 2015, each relative to the corresponding prior fiscal year, due to higher employee related expenses resulting from increased headcount and due to higher professional services expenses, primarily as a result of a fiscal 2011 $120 million benefit from the recovery of certain legal costs, which reduced our expenses in fiscal 2011.related expenses.
Amortization of Intangible Assets:Substantially all of our intangible assets are acquired through our business combinations. We amortize our intangible assets over, and monitor the appropriateness of, the estimated useful lives of these assets. We also periodically review these intangible assets for potential impairment based upon relevant facts and circumstances. Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report has additional information regarding our intangible assets and related amortization.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software support agreements and related relationships | $ | 582 | -1% | -1% | $ | 585 | 3% | 3% | $ | 570 | $ | 358 | -33% | -33% | $ | 531 | -7% | -7% | $ | 571 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support agreements and related relationships | 121 | 2% | 2% | 119 | 1% | 1% | 118 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support agreements and related relationships | 145 | 1% | 1% | 144 | 1% | 1% | 143 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | 826 | -11% | -11% | 923 | -7% | -7% | 992 | 559 | -20% | -20% | 700 | -1% | -1% | 706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core technology | 329 | -2% | -2% | 337 | 9% | 9% | 308 | 89 | -51% | -51% | 182 | -43% | -43% | 318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships and contract backlog | 350 | -5% | -5% | 370 | 2% | 2% | 363 | 217 | -30% | -30% | 312 | -7% | -7% | 334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software subscriptions and related relationships | 113 | 242% | 242% | 33 | 267% | 267% | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS, PaaS and IaaS agreements and related relationships and other | 212 | 4% | 4% | 203 | 35% | 35% | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks | 64 | 2% | 2% | 63 | -7% | -7% | 68 | 58 | -25% | -25% | 77 | -1% | -1% | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortization of intangible assets | $ | 2,385 | -2% | -2% | $ | 2,430 | 0% | 0% | $ | 2,428 | $ | 1,638 | -24% | -24% | $ | 2,149 | -7% | -7% | $ | 2,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012:Amortization of intangible assets decreased modestly during fiscal 2013 as2016 and fiscal 2015, each relative to the corresponding prior fiscal year, due to a reduction in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets pertaining to our acquisitions of Sun and certain other companiesthat became fully amortized.These decreases were partially offset by additional amortization from intangible assets that weassociated with recently acquired in connection with our acquisitions, including our acquisitions of Acme Packet in fiscal 2013, and RightNow and Taleo in fiscal 2012, among others.completed acquisitions. Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report has additional information regarding our intangible assets and related amortization.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: Amortization of intangible assets in fiscal 2012 in comparison to fiscal 2011 was flat as additional amortization from intangible assets that we acquired from our acquisitions of RightNow and Taleo in fiscal 2012 and from our acquisitions of ATG and Phase Forward in fiscal 2011, among others, were offset by a reduction in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.
Acquisition Related and Other Expenses:Acquisition related and other expenses consist of personnel related costs for transitional and certain other employees, stock-based compensation expenses, integration related professional services, certain business combination adjustments including certain adjustments after the measurement period has ended and changes in fair value of contingent consideration payable (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report) and certain other operating items, net. Stock-based compensation expenses included in acquisition related and other expenses resulted from unvested stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed from acquisitions whereby vesting was accelerated upon termination of the employees pursuant to the original terms of those stock options and restricted stock-based awards.
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transitional and other employee related costs | $ | 27 | 6% | 9% | $ | 25 | -81% | -81% | $ | 129 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 33 | 1% | 1% | 33 | 254% | 254% | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Professional fees and other, net | (276 | ) | -2,314% | -2,216% | 13 | -81% | -83% | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Business combination adjustments, net | (388 | ) | -2,543% | -2,426% | (15 | ) | -499% | -515% | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total acquisition related and other expenses | $ | (604 | ) | -1,183% | -1,200% | $ | 56 | -73% | -74% | $ | 208 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transitional and other employee related costs | $ | 45 | -20% | -19% | $ | 57 | 112% | 120% | $ | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 3 | -43% | -43% | 5 | -48% | -48% | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Professional fees and other, net | 10 | 128% | 128% | (35 | ) | 274% | 279% | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Business combination adjustments, net | (16 | ) | -109% | -109% | 184 | 1,235% | 1,239% | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total acquisition related and other expenses | $ | 42 | -80% | -80% | $ | 211 | 412% | 411% | $ | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012: On a constant currency basis, the decrease in our acquisitionAcquisition related and other expenses decreased in fiscal 2013 was2016 and increased in fiscal 2015, each relative to the corresponding prior fiscal year, primarily due to a business combination benefit$186 million goodwill impairment loss recorded during fiscal 2015. We also recorded an acquisition related to the change in fair value of contingent consideration payable, which resulted in a net benefit of $387$19 million and a litigation related benefit of $53 million in fiscal 2013 (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report),2016 and a $306 million benefit in fiscal 2013 that we recorded to professional fees and other, net related to certain litigation (see Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report).
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: On a constant currency basis, the decrease in acquisition related and other expenses during fiscal 2012 was primarily due to lower transitional employee related costs and professional services expenses in comparison to those that were incurred in fiscal 2011 (primarily related to our acquisition of Sun), and was also due to a benefit from a business combination related legal settlement,2015, respectively, which reduced our fiscal 2012 expenses. These expense reductions were partially offset by an increaseexpenses in stock-based compensation expenses associated with our recent acquisitions and expenses associated with the change in fair value of contingent consideration payable during fiscal 2012.those periods.
Restructuring expenses:Expenses: Restructuring expenses resultresulted from the execution of management approved restructuring plans that were generally developed to improve our cost structure and/or operations, often in conjunction with our acquisition integration strategies. Restructuring expenses consist of employee severance costs and may also include charges for duplicate facilities and other contract termination costs to improve our cost structure prospectively. For additional information regarding our restructuring plans, see Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses | $ | 352 | 19% | 23% | $ | 295 | -40% | -40% | $ | 487 | $ | 458 | 121% | 145% | $ | 207 | 14% | 22% | $ | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses in fiscal 2016 primarily related to our 2015 Restructuring Plan. Restructuring expenses in fiscal 2015 primarily related to our 2015 Restructuring Plan and our 2013 Restructuring Plan. Restructuring expenses in fiscal 2014 primarily related to our 2013 Restructuring Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012: Plan, which our management approved, committed to and initiated in order to restructure and further improve efficiencies in our operations. We amended the 2013 Restructuring Plan in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to reflect additional actions that we expect to take to improve efficiencies in our operations. The total estimated restructuring costs associated with the 2013 Restructuring Plan are $420 million and will be recordedPlan. Actions pursuant to the restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations as they are incurred. The total estimated remaining restructuring costs associated with the 2013 Restructuring Planaforementioned plans were approximately $95 millionsubstantially complete as of May 31, 2013. The majority of the remaining costs are expected to be incurred through fiscal 2014. Our estimated costs2016. We may be subject to change in future periods.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: Restructuring expenses in fiscal 2012 primarily related to our Sun Restructuring Plan, which our management approved, committed to and initiated in order to better align our cost structure as a result of our acquisition of Sun. The decrease inincur restructuring expenses in fiscal 2012 in comparison to those that were incurred in fiscal 2011 primarily relatedfuture periods due to the decreaseinitiation of new restructuring plans or from changes in expenses incurred in connectionestimated costs associated with our Sun Restructuring Plan.legacy restructuring plans.
Interest Expense:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 797 | 4% | 4% | $ | 766 | -5% | -5% | $ | 808 | $ | 1,467 | 28% | 28% | $ | 1,143 | 25% | 25% | $ | 914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Interest expense increased in fiscal 20132016 primarily due to higher average borrowings resulting from our issuance of $5.0$10.0 billion of senior notes in October 2012,May 2015. We also issued $10.0 billion of senior notes in July 2014, which also contributed to additional interest expense during fiscal 2016 relative to fiscal 2015. These increases in interest expense during fiscal 2016 were partially offset by reductions in interest expense resulting from the maturity and repayment of $2.0 billion of senior notes in January 2016. Interest expense was also reduced in fiscal 2016 by the maturity and repayment of $1.25$1.5 billion of senior notes and the related fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements in April 2013 (seeJuly 2014. See Recent Financing Activities below and Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information).information regarding our borrowings.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: Interest expense decreasedincreased in fiscal 20122015 primarily due to lowerhigher average borrowings as compared toresulting from our issuance of $10.0 billion of senior notes in May 2015 and $10.0 billion of senior notes in July 2014. The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2011 primarily due to2015 was partially offset by a reduction in interest expense during fiscal 2015 resulting from the maturity and repayment of $2.25$1.5 billion of senior notes and the related fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements in January 2011.July 2014.
Non-Operating Income (Expense), net:Non-operating income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income, net foreign currency exchange gains (losses), the noncontrolling interests in the net profits of our majority-owned subsidiaries (Oracle(primarily Oracle Financial Services Software Limited and Oracle Japan) and net other income (losses), including net realized gains and losses related to all of our investments and net unrealized gains and losses related to the small portion of our investment portfolio that we classify as trading.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 237 | 3% | 7% | $ | 231 | 42% | 45% | $ | 163 | $ | 538 | 54% | 59% | $ | 349 | 33% | 33% | $ | 263 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency (losses) gains, net | (162 | ) | 54% | 51% | (105 | ) | -1,041% | -1,112% | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency losses, net | (110 | ) | -30% | -37% | (157 | ) | -58% | -59% | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests in income | (112 | ) | -6% | -4% | (119 | ) | 23% | 25% | (97 | ) | (116 | ) | 2% | 2% | (113 | ) | 15% | 15% | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net | 48 | 220% | 225% | 15 | -86% | -86% | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (loss) income, net | (7 | ) | 126% | 126% | 27 | -60% | -60% | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-operating income, net | $ | 11 | -49% | 4% | $ | 22 | -88% | -83% | $ | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-operating income (expense), net | $ | 305 | 188% | 221% | $ | 106 | 175% | 187% | $ | (141 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: On a constant currency basis, our non-operating income, net decreased infor fiscal 2013 primarily2016 increased due to an increase inhigher interest income resulting from higher interest rates and higher cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment balances and due to lower net foreign currency transaction losses, net, that included a loss relating to our Venezuelan subsidiary’s operations. During our third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and we recognized a $64 million foreign currency loss as a result of the remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities of our Venezuelan subsidiary. As a large portion of our consolidated operations are international, we could experience additional foreign currency volatility in the future including additional foreign currency losses related to our Venezuelan subsidiary if the Venezuelan government further devalues the Venezuelan currency, the amounts and timing of which are uncertain. This decrease in non-operating income, net was partially offset by an increase in other income, net during fiscal 2013, which was primarily due to gains from our marketable securities that we designated as trading that were held to support our deferred compensation plan obligations.losses.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: On a constant currency basis, our non-operating income, net decreased in fiscal 2012 primarily as a result of2015 increased due to lower net foreign currency transaction losses incurredand due to higher interest income resulting from higher cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment balances. Included in fiscal 2012 in comparison to net foreign currency transaction gains incurred in fiscal 2011. In addition, we incurred a decrease in other income, net, during fiscal 2012 which was attributable to net gains that we recorded in fiscal 2011 due to favorable changes in the values of our marketable securities that we classified as trading that were held to support our deferred compensation plan obligations. These unfavorable variations to non-operating income,losses, net in fiscal 20122015 and 2014 were partially offset by increasesremeasurement losses of $23 million and $213 million, respectively, related to our Venezuelan subsidiary. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in interest income during fiscal 2012 duethis Annual Report contains additional information regarding the foreign currency remeasurement losses we incurred in all periods related to larger average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances in comparison to fiscal 2011.our Venezuelan subsidiary.
Provision for Income Taxes:Our effective tax rate in all periods is the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. The provision for income taxes differs from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due primarily to certain earnings considered as indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations, state taxes, the U.S. research and development tax credit, settlements with tax authorities and the U.S. domestic production activity deduction. Future effective tax rates could be adversely affected if earnings are lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory tax rates, by unfavorable changes in tax laws and regulations or by adverse rulings in tax related litigation.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Actual | Constant | 2012 | Actual | Constant | 2011 | 2016 | Actual | Constant | 2015 | Actual | Constant | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 2,973 | 0% | 3% | $ | 2,981 | 4% | 4% | $ | 2,864 | $ | 2,541 | -12% | -5% | $ | 2,896 | 5% | 13% | $ | 2,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate | 21.4% | 23.0% | 25.1% | 22.2% | 22.6% | 20.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Provision for income taxes in fiscal 20132016 decreased, slightlyrelative to the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2015, due in substantial part to acquisition related items,lower net income before provision for income taxes during fiscal 2016, settlements with certain tax authorities, and the retroactive extension of the U.S. research and development tax credit, which collectively were partially offset by higherunfavorable changes in the jurisdictional mix of our earnings during fiscal 2016.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014: Provision for income taxes in fiscal 2015 increased, relative to the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2014, due in substantial part to an unfavorable change in the jurisdictional mix of our fiscal 2015 earnings, and due to the effects of acquisition related settlements with tax authorities in fiscal 2014 that were not present in fiscal 2015, which together were partially offset by lower fiscal 2015 income before provision for income taxes.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: Provision for income taxes increased during fiscal 2012 due substantially to higher income before provision for income taxes, partially offset by the favorable effects of an increase in the number of foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower statutory rates than the United States, the earnings of which we consider to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
| As of May 31, | As of May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Change | 2012 | Change | 2011 | 2016 | Change | 2015 | Change | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 28,820 | 17% | $ | 24,635 | -1% | $ | 24,982 | $ | 47,105 | -2% | $ | 47,892 | 42% | $ | 33,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 32,216 | 5% | $ | 30,676 | 6% | $ | 28,848 | $ | 56,125 | 3% | $ | 54,368 | 40% | $ | 38,819 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital: The decrease in working capital as of May 31, 2016 in comparison to May 31, 2015 was primarily due to $10.4 billion of cash used for repurchases of our common stock, $2.5 billion of cash used to pay dividends to our stockholders and $1.2 billion of cash used for capital expenditures. These unfavorable working capital movements were partially offset by the favorable impacts to our net current assets resulting from our net income during fiscal 2016 and cash proceeds from fiscal 2016 stock option exercises.
The increase in working capital as of May 31, 20132015 in comparison to May 31, 20122014 was primarily due to our issuance of $5.0$20.0 billion of long-term senior notes in October 2012,during fiscal 2015, the favorable impact to our net current assets resulting from our net income during fiscal 2013,2015 and, to a lesser extent, cash proceeds from stock option exercises. This increase wasThese working capital increases were partially offset by $6.2 billion of net cash used for our acquisitions of MICROS and others, $8.1 billion of cash used for repurchases of our common stock, (we used $11.0the reclassification of $2.0 billion of cash for common stock repurchases during fiscal 2013),senior notes that were due in January 2016 from long-term to current, and $2.3 billion of cash used to pay dividends to our stockholders, and cash used for acquisitions. all of which occurred during fiscal 2015.
Our working capital may be impacted by some or all of the aforementioned factors in future periods, the amounts and timing of which are variable.
The decrease in working capital as of May 31, 2012 in comparison to May 31, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in our stock repurchases during fiscal 2012 in comparison to fiscal 2011, the reclassification of $1.25 billion of our senior notes due April 2013 as a current liability, cash used for acquisitions and cash used to pay dividends to our stockholders. These decreases to working capital were almost entirely offset by the favorable impact to our net current assets resulting from our net income during fiscal 2012.
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities: Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of deposits held at major banks, Tier-1 commercial paper and other securities with original maturities of 90 days or less. Marketable securities primarily consist of time deposits held at major banks, Tier-1 commercial paper debt securities, corporate notes,debt securities and certain other securities. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at May 31, 20132016 in comparison to May 31, 20122015 was primarily due to an increase in cash inflows generated fromby our operating activities, our issuance of $5.0operations during fiscal 2016, $1.8 billion of senior notes in October 2012, and to a lesser extent,net cash proceedsinflows from fiscal 20132016 debt issuances, net of debt repayments, and cash inflows from fiscal 2016 stock option exercises. This increase wasThese fiscal 2016 cash inflows were partially offset by $11.0fiscal 2016 cash outflows of $10.4 billion offor repurchases of our common stock, $3.3$2.5 billion of net cash paid for acquisitions, the repayments of $1.7 billion of short-term borrowings pursuant to our expired revolving credit facilities, the repayment of $1.25 billion of senior notes which matured in April 2013, and thefiscal 2016 payment of cash dividends to our stockholders.stockholders, and $1.2 billion for fiscal 2016 capital expenditures. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities included $28.2$48.2 billion held by our foreign subsidiaries as of May 31, 2013.2016. We consider $26.2$42.6 billion of our undistributed earnings as indefinitely reinvested in our foreign operations outside the United States. These undistributed earnings would be subject to U.S. income tax if repatriated to the United States. Assuming a full utilization of the foreign tax credits, the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings would be approximately $8.0$13.3 billion as of May 31, 20132016 should the amounts be repatriated to the United States. The amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities that we report in U.S. Dollars for a significant portion of the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances held by our foreign subsidiaries is subject to translation adjustments caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates as of the end of each respective reporting period (the offset to which is substantially recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) incomeloss in our consolidated balance sheets and is also presented as a line item in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income included elsewhere in this Annual Report). As the U.S. Dollar generally strengthened against certain major international currencies during fiscal 2013,2016, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities that we reported in U.S. Dollars for these subsidiaries decreased on a net basis as of May 31, 20132016 relative to what we would have reported using constant currency rates from our May 31, 20122015 balance sheet date.
The increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at May 31, 20122015 in comparison to May 31, 20112014 was primarily due to an increase in cash generated from our fiscal 2015 operating activities, and our short-term borrowingsissuance of $1.7$20.0 billion made pursuantof senior notes in fiscal 2015, and to a revolving credit agreement, which expired inlesser extent, cash proceeds from fiscal 2013.2015 stock option exercises. These increases infiscal 2015 cash cash equivalents and marketable securitiesinflows were partially offset by our June 2011 repaymentfiscal 2015 cash outflows of $1.15 billion of short-term borrowings pursuant to certain expired revolving credit facilities, $255 million of cash used to repay RightNow’s legacy convertible notes after the closing of the acquisition, the use of $4.7$6.2 billion of net cash paid for our acquisitions theof MICROS and others, $8.1 billion of fiscal 2015 repurchases of our common stock, the repayment of $1.5 billion of senior notes and $2.3 billion used for the payment of fiscal 2015 cash dividends to our stockholders. Additionally, our reported cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances decreased as of May 31, 20122015 decreased on a net basis in comparison to May 31, 2011 due to the general strengthening of2014 as the U.S. Dollar generally strengthened in comparison to certainmost major international currencies during fiscal 2012.2015.
Days sales outstanding, which was calculatedwe calculate by dividing period end accounts receivable by average daily sales for the quarter, was 5046 days at May 31, 20132016 compared with 5347 days at May 31, 2012.2015. The days sales outstanding calculation excludedexcludes the impact of any revenue adjustments resulting from business combinations that reduced our acquired cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS obligations, software license updates and product support obligations and hardware systems support obligations to fair value.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Change | 2012 | Change | 2011 | 2016 | Change | 2015 | Change | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 14,224 | 3% | $ | 13,743 | 23% | $ | 11,214 | $ | 13,561 | -5% | $ | 14,336 | -4% | $ | 14,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities | $ | (5,956 | ) | -29% | $ | (8,381 | ) | 38% | $ | (6,081 | ) | $ | (5,154 | ) | -73% | $ | (19,047 | ) | 153% | $ | (7,539 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | $ | (8,500 | ) | 39% | $ | (6,099 | ) | 1,282% | $ | 516 | $ | (9,856 | ) | 200% | $ | 9,850 | 342% | $ | (4,068 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:Our largest source of operating cash flows is cash collections from our customers following the purchase and renewal of their software license updates and product support agreements. Payments from customers for these support agreements are generally received near the beginning of the contracts’ terms, which are generally one year in length. WeOver the course of a fiscal year, we also generate significanthave historically generated cash from the sales of new software licenses, salescloud SaaS and sales ofPaaS offerings, hardware systemsproducts, hardware support arrangements, and to a lesser extent, sales of services, hardware systems products, and cloud software subscriptions.services. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are for employee related expenditures, material and manufacturing costs related to the production of our hardware systems products, taxes and leased facilities.
Net cash provided by operating activities Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012: increaseddecreased in fiscal 2013 in comparison to fiscal 20122016 and 2015 primarily due to the cash favorable impactsunfavorable effects of increasedlower net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation and depreciation during fiscal 2013 in comparison to fiscal 2012.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011: Net cash provided by operating activities increased in fiscal 2012 primarily due to increasedthe related unfavorable currency rate fluctuations on our net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation and depreciation, an increase in cash from the collection of trade receivables, an increase in cash received that relates to our deferred revenue balances, a decrease in cash used to pay income tax obligations and certain other net cash favorable working capital movements, in each case during fiscal 2012 in comparisonyear relative to fiscal 2011. These cash favorable movements in fiscal 2012 in comparison to fiscal 2011 were partially offset by an increase in cash used to pay compensation liabilities in fiscal 2012 such as commissions and bonuses.the corresponding prior year period.
Cash flows from investing activities:The changes in cash flows from investing activities primarily relate to our acquisitions, and the timing of our purchases, maturities and sales of our investments in marketable debt securities. We also use cash to investsecurities and investments in capital and other assets, including certain intangible assets, to support our growth.
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Net cash used for investing activities decreased in fiscal 20132016 relative to fiscal 2015 primarily due to a decrease in net cash used to purchase marketable securities (net of proceeds received from sales and maturities) and a decrease in cash used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, in each case during fiscal 2013 in comparison to fiscal 2012.acquired.
Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 2011:2014: Net cash used for investing activities increased in fiscal 20122015 relative to fiscal 2014 primarily due to an increase in cash used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and an increase in capital expenditures, partially offset by a decrease in net cash used to purchase marketable securities (net of proceeds received from sales and maturities), in each case during fiscal 2012 in comparison to fiscal 2011..
Cash flows from financing activities: The changes in cash flows from financing activities primarily relate to borrowings and payments underrepayments related to our debt facilitiesinstruments as well as stock repurchases, dividend payments and net proceeds fromrelated to employee stock option exercises.programs.
Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 2012:2015: Net cash used for financing activities in fiscal 2013 increased in comparison to fiscal 2012 primarily due to an increase in our common stock repurchases (we used $11.0 billion of cash for common stock repurchases during fiscal 2013 in comparison to $5.9 billion in fiscal 2012) and an increase in repayments of borrowings (we repaid $3.0 billion of borrowings pursuant to senior notes maturities and certain expired revolving credit facilities in fiscal 2013 in comparison to the repayments of $1.4 billion of short-term borrowings from expired revolving credit facilities, and legacy convertible notes assumed from RightNow in fiscal 2012), partially offset by our issuance of $5.0 billion of senior notes in October 2012, an increase in proceeds from stock option exercises and certain other financing activity cash flow increases, net.
Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011:We used net cash for financing activities inof $9.9 billion during fiscal 2012 of $6.1 billion2016 in comparison to net cash provided by financing activities of $9.9 billion during fiscal 2015. Cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2011 of $516 million2016 was primarily due to our increase incash outflows of $10.4 billion for fiscal 2016 common stock repurchases a reduction in the amountand $2.5 billion for fiscal 2016 dividend payments, partially offset by $1.8 billion of cash inflows from fiscal 2016 debt that we issued, and a decrease in proceeds from stock option exercises, in each caseissuances, net of repayments. Cash provided by financing activities of $9.9 billion during fiscal 20122015 was primarily due to $18.3 billion of net cash inflows from fiscal 2015 debt issuances, net of repayments, partially offset by $8.1 billion of cash used for fiscal 2015 common stock repurchases and $2.3 billion of cash used for fiscal 2015 dividend payments.
Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014: Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2015 increased in comparison to net cash used by financing activities in fiscal 2011.2014 primarily due to a net increase in borrowings in fiscal 2015 as well as lower stock repurchase activity during fiscal 2015. These unfavorablefavorable impacts to our financing cash flows during fiscal 2012 in comparison to fiscal 20112015 were partially offset by a decrease in cash used for debt relatedthe repayment of $1.5 billion of borrowings pursuant to senior notes maturities during fiscal 2015 (no repayments during fiscal 2012.2014).
Free cash flow:To supplement our statements of cash flows presented on a GAAP basis, we use non-GAAP measures of cash flows on a trailing 4-quarter basis to analyze cash flows generated from our operations. We believe free cash flow is also useful as
one of the bases for comparing our performance with our competitors. The presentation of non-GAAP free cash flow is not meant to be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. We calculate free cash flowsflow as follows:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | Change | 2012 | Change | 2011 | 2016 | Change | 2015 | Change | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 14,224 | 3% | $ | 13,743 | 23% | $ | 11,214 | $ | 13,561 | -5% | $ | 14,336 | -4% | $ | 14,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (650 | ) | 0% | (648 | ) | 44% | (450 | ) | (1,189 | ) | -15% | (1,391 | ) | 140% | (580 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 13,574 | 4% | $ | 13,095 | 22% | $ | 10,764 | $ | 12,372 | -4% | $ | 12,945 | -10% | $ | 14,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Free cash flow as percent of net income | 124% | 131% | 126% | 139% | 130% | 131% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-Term Customer Financing: We offer certain of our customers the option to acquire our software products, hardware systems products and services offerings through separate long-term payment contracts. We generally sell these contracts that we have financed for our customers on a non-recourse basis to financial institutions within 90 days of the contracts’ dates of execution. We generally record the transfers of amounts due from customers to financial institutions as sales of financial assetsfinancing receivables because we are considered to have surrendered control of these financial assets.financing receivables. We financed $1.8$1.2 billion in fiscal 2016, and $1.6 billion in each of fiscal 2015 and $1.5 billion, respectively,2014, or approximately 18%16%, 19% and 17%, respectively, of our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues in fiscal 20132016, 2015 and 16%,2014. We financed $159 million, $172 million and $168 million of our new software licenseshardware products revenues in fiscal 2016, 2015 and cloud software subscriptions revenues2014, respectively, or approximately 6% in each of fiscal 20122016, 2015 and 2011, and $161 million, $134 million and $117 million, respectively, or approximately 5%,2014 of our hardware systems products revenues in fiscal 2013 and 3% of our hardware systems products revenues in each of fiscal 2012 and 2011.revenues.
Recent Financing Activities:
Commercial Paper NotesRevolving Credit Agreement: On April 22, 2013, pursuant to our existing $3.0 billion commercial paper program which allows us to issue and sell unsecured short-term promissory notes pursuant to a private placement exemption from the registration requirements under federal and state securities laws,In May 2016, we entered into new dealerthree revolving credit agreements with various banks and a new Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement with JP MorganJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. As, as initial lender and administrative agent (the 2016 Credit Agreements) and borrowed $3.8 billion pursuant to these agreements. The 2016 Credit Agreements provided us with short-term borrowings for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Interest for the 2016 Credit Agreements is based on either (1) a LIBOR-based formula or (2) the Base Rate formula, each as set forth in the 2016 Credit Agreements. The borrowings are due and payable on June 27, 2016, which is the termination date of May 31, 2013 and 2012, we did not have any commercial paper notes outstanding. We intend to back-stop any commercial paper notes that we may issue with our 2013the 2016 Credit Agreement (see additional details below).Agreements. Additional details regarding our commercial paper programthe 2016 Credit Agreements are included in Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Revolving Credit Agreements: In April 2013, we entered into a $3.0 billion Revolving Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., BNP Paribas, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and certain other lenders (the 2013 Credit Agreement). The 2013 Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured 5-year revolving credit facility to be used for general corporate purposes including back-stopping any commercial paper notes that we may issue. Subject to certain conditions stated in the 2013 Credit Agreement, we may borrow, prepay and re-borrow amounts under the 2013 Credit Agreement at any time during the term of the 2013 Credit Agreement. Interest under the 2013 Credit Agreement is based on either (a) a LIBOR-based formula or (b) the Base Rate formula, each as set forth in the 2013 Credit Agreement. Any amounts drawn pursuant to the 2013 Credit Agreement are due on April 20, 2018. No amounts were outstanding pursuant to the 2013 Credit Agreement as of May 31, 2013.
The 2013 Credit Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties, covenants and events of default, including the requirement that our total net debt to total capitalization ratio not exceed 45% on a consolidated basis. If any of the events of default occur and are not cured within applicable grace periods or waived, any unpaid amounts under the 2013 Credit Agreement may be declared immediately due and payable and the 2013 Credit Agreement may be terminated. We were in compliance with the 2013 Credit Agreement’s covenants as of May 31, 2013.
On July 2, 2012, our revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as initial lender and administrative agent; and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (the 2012 Credit Agreement) to borrow $1.7 billion was repaid in full and the 2012 Credit Agreement expired pursuant to its terms.
Senior Notes: As of May 31, 2013, we had $18.5In January 2016, our $2.0 billion of5.25% senior notes outstanding ($14.8 billion outstanding as of May 31, 2012). In April 2013, our 4.95% fixed rate senior notes for $1.25 billiondue January 2016 matured and were repaid. In October 2012, we issued
$5.0 billion of fixed rate senior notes comprised of $2.5 billion of 1.20% notes due October 2017 and $2.5 billion of 2.50% notes due October 2022. We issued these senior notes for general corporate purposes, which may include stock repurchases, future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness. Additional details regarding these senior notes and all other borrowings are included in the “Contractual Obligations” section below and in Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Cash Dividends: DuringIn fiscal 2013, our Board of Directors declared and paid cash dividends in the aggregate of $0.30 per share of outstanding common stock, which included an accelerated cash dividend of $0.18 per share of outstanding common stock paid on December 21, 2012. This accelerated cash dividend was intended by our Board of Directors to be in lieu of quarterly dividends that we would have otherwise announced with our earnings results for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2013, and that would have been paid in calendar year 2013. During fiscal 2012,2016, we declared and paid cash dividends totaling $0.24of $0.60 per share of outstanding common stock.
that totaled $2.5 billion. In June 2013,2016, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12$0.15 per share of outstanding common stock. This $0.12 per share cash dividend was an increase of $0.06 per share over the last regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share ofour outstanding common stock paid on November 2, 2012 and was declared earlier than the Board of Directors had previously planned. The $0.12 per share cash dividend is payable on August 2, 2013July 27, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 12, 2013. We currently expect to continue paying comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future; however, future6, 2016. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination of our Board of Directors.
Common Stock Repurchases: Our Board of Directors has approved a program for us to repurchase shares of our common stock. On June 18, 2012,March 15, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an expansion of our stock repurchase program by an additional $10.0 billion. On June 20, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a further expansion by an additional $12.0 billion. As of May 31, 2013,2016, approximately $2.1$8.8 billion remained available for stock repurchases under thepursuant to our stock repurchase program prior to the additional amount authorized in June 2013.program. We repurchased 346.1271.9 million shares for $11.0$10.4 billion, 207.3193.7 million shares for $6.0$8.1 billion, and 40.4280.4 million shares for $1.2$9.8 billion in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Our stock repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date and the pace of our repurchase activity will depend on factors such as our working capital needs, our cash requirements for acquisitions and dividend payments, our debt repayment obligations (described further below), or repurchases of our debt, our stock price, and economic and market conditions. Our stock repurchases may be effected from time to time through open market purchases or pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Our stock repurchase program may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time.
Contractual Obligations: The contractual obligations presented in the table below represent our estimates of future payments under fixed contractual obligations and commitments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, changing interest rates and other factors may result in actual payments differing from these estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most significant assumptions used in preparing this information within the context of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The following is a summary of certain of our contractual obligations as of May 31, 2013:2016:
| Year Ending May 31, | Year Ending May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Total | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | Total | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on borrowings(1) | $ | 18,500 | $ | — | $ | 1,500 | $ | 2,000 | $ | — | $ | 5,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 44,241 | $ | 3,750 | $ | 6,000 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 4,500 | $ | 2,655 | $ | 25,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest payments on borrowings(1) | 10,060 | 770 | 759 | 748 | 643 | 628 | 6,512 | 19,756 | 1,337 | 1,315 | 1,154 | 1,083 | 1,010 | 13,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(2) | 1,406 | 358 | 293 | 230 | 170 | 117 | 238 | 1,238 | 328 | 273 | 211 | 152 | 110 | 164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations and other(3) | 806 | 763 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 894 | 574 | 153 | 91 | 68 | 8 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 30,772 | $ | 1,891 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 2,982 | $ | 814 | $ | 5,746 | $ | 16,761 | $ | 66,129 | $ | 5,989 | $ | 7,741 | $ | 3,456 | $ | 5,803 | $ | 3,783 | $ | 39,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the principal balances and interest payments to be paid in connection with our senior notes and other borrowings |
| Amount | ||||
3.75% senior notes due July 2014, net of fair value adjustment of $41 | $ | 1,541 | ||
5.25% senior notes due January 2016, net of discount of $3 | 1,997 | |||
1.20% senior notes due October 2017, net of discount of $3 | 2,497 | |||
5.75% senior notes due April 2018, net of discount of $1 | 2,499 | |||
5.00% senior notes due July 2019, net of discount of $4 | 1,746 | |||
3.875% senior notes due July 2020, net of discount of $2 | 998 | |||
2.50% senior notes due October 2022, net of discount of $2 | 2,498 | |||
6.50% senior notes due April 2038, net of discount of $2 | 1,248 | |||
6.125% senior notes due July 2039, net of discount of $7 | 1,243 | |||
5.375% senior notes due July 2040, net of discount of $24 | 2,226 | |||
|
| |||
Total borrowings | $ | 18,493 | ||
|
| |||
certain interest rate swap agreements for certain series of senior notes that have the economic effect of modifying the fixed-interest obligations associated with these senior notes so that they effectively became variable pursuant to a LIBOR-based index. Interest payments on these senior notes have been presented in the table above after consideration of these fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements and are subject to change in future periods;
interest payments on our floating-rate senior notes that are based upon the interest rates applicable to the senior notes as of May 31, 2016 and are subject to change in future periods; and
certain cross-currency swap agreements for a series of our Euro denominated senior notes that have the economic effect of converting our fixed-rate, Euro-denominated debt, including annual interest payments and the payment of principal at maturity, to a fixed-rate, U.S. Dollar-denominated debt with a fixed annual interest rate. Principal and interest payments for these senior notes were calculated and presented in the table above based on the terms of these cross-currency swap agreements. Principal and interest payments for our other Euro-denominated senior notes presented in the contractual obligations table above were estimated using foreign currency exchange rates as of May 31, 2016 and are subject to change in future periods.
| (2) | Primarily represents leases of facilities and includes future minimum rent payments for facilities that we have vacated pursuant to our restructuring and merger integration activities. We have approximately |
| (3) | Primarily represents amounts associated with agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and specify terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the payment. We utilize several external manufacturers to manufacture sub-assemblies for our hardware products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished hardware products. We also obtain individual hardware components for our products from a variety of individual suppliers based on projected demand information. Such purchase commitments are based on our forecasted component and manufacturing requirements and typically provide for fulfillment within agreed upon lead-times and/or commercially standard lead-times for the particular part or product and have been included in the amount presented in the above contractual obligations table. Routine arrangements for other materials and goods that are not related to our external manufacturers and certain other suppliers and that are entered into in the ordinary course of business are not included in the amounts presented above, as they are generally entered into in order to secure pricing or other negotiated terms and are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way. |
In June 2016, we acquired certain companies to expand our cloud industry solutions offerings. These acquisitions were not individually significant. In the aggregate, the estimated total preliminary purchase price was $1.3 billion.
As of May 31, 2013,2016, we had $4.3$5.3 billion of gross unrecognized income tax benefits, including related interest and penalties, recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, and all such obligations have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above due to the uncertainty as to when they might be settled. We have reached certain settlement agreements with relevant tax authorities to pay approximately $15 million of these liabilities. Although it remains unclear as to when payments pursuant to these agreements will be made, some or all may be made in fiscal 2014. We cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period in which the remainder of our unrecognized income tax benefits will be settled or released with the relevant tax authorities, although we believe it is reasonably possible that certain of these liabilities could be settled or released during fiscal 2014.
Subsequent to fiscal 2013, we agreed to acquire a company for an amount that is not material to our business. We expect to close the acquisition within the next twelve months.2017.
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditures and contractual obligation requirements. In addition, we believe that we could fund any future acquisitions, dividend payments and repurchases of common stock or debt with our internally available cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, cash generated from operations, additional borrowings or from the issuance of additional securities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that areis material to investors.
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
Quarterly revenues, expenses and operating income have historically been affected by a variety of seasonal factors, including the structure of sales force incentive compensation plans. In addition, our European operations generally provide lower revenues in our first fiscal quarter because of the reduced economic activity in Europe during the summer. These seasonal factors are common in the high technology industry. These factors have caused a decrease in our first quarter revenues as compared to revenues in the immediately preceding fourth quarter, which historically has been our highest revenue quarter within a particular fiscal year. Similarly, the operating income of our business is affected by seasonal factors in a consistentsimilar manner as our revenues (in particular, our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software segment) as certain expenses within our cost structure are relatively fixed in the short-term.short term. We expect these trends to continue in fiscal 2014.2017.
The following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly information for our last eight fiscal quarters. We believe that all necessary adjustments, which consisted only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the results of such periods when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The sum of the quarterly financial information may vary from the annual data due to rounding.
| Fiscal 2013 Quarter Ended (Unaudited) | Fiscal 2016 Quarter Ended (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | August 31 | November 30 | February 28 | May 31 | August 31 | November 30 | February 29 | May 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 8,181 | $ | 9,094 | $ | 8,958 | $ | 10,947 | $ | 8,448 | $ | 8,993 | $ | 9,012 | $ | 10,594 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 6,289 | $ | 7,187 | $ | 7,110 | $ | 8,969 | $ | 6,561 | $ | 7,105 | $ | 7,139 | $ | 8,640 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,879 | $ | 3,471 | $ | 3,334 | $ | 5,000 | $ | 2,654 | $ | 2,955 | $ | 3,027 | $ | 3,968 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,034 | $ | 2,581 | $ | 2,504 | $ | 3,807 | $ | 1,747 | $ | 2,197 | $ | 2,142 | $ | 2,814 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share—basic | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal 2012 Quarter Ended (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | August 31 | November 30 | February 29 | May 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 8,374 | $ | 8,792 | $ | 9,039 | $ | 10,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 6,339 | $ | 6,792 | $ | 7,088 | $ | 8,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,683 | $ | 3,111 | $ | 3,317 | $ | 4,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,840 | $ | 2,192 | $ | 2,498 | $ | 3,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share—basic | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal 2015 Quarter Ended (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | August 31 | November 30 | February 28 | May 31 | ||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 8,596 | $ | 9,598 | $ | 9,327 | $ | 10,706 | ||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 6,878 | $ | 7,657 | $ | 7,394 | $ | 8,611 | ||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,963 | $ | 3,542 | $ | 3,383 | $ | 3,982 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,184 | $ | 2,502 | $ | 2,495 | $ | 2,758 | ||||||||
Earnings per share—basic | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||
Earnings per share—diluted | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||||
Stock Options and Restricted Stock-Based Awards and Stock Options
Our stock-based compensation program is a key component of the compensation package we provide to attract and retain certain of our talented employees and align their interests with the interests of existing stockholders.
We historically have granted only stock options to our employees and anyrecognize that restricted stock-based awards outstanding were assumed as a result of our acquisitions.
We recognize thatand stock options and restricted stock-based awards dilute existing stockholders and have sought to control the number of stock options and restricted stock-based awards granted while providing competitive compensation packages. Consistent with these dual goals, our cumulative potential dilution since June 1, 20102013 has been a weighted averageweighted-average annualized rate of 2.0%1.6% per year. The potential dilution percentage is calculated as the average annualized new stock options or restricted stock-based awards or stock options granted and assumed, net of stock options and restricted stock-based awards and stock options forfeited by employees leaving the company, divided
by the weighted averageweighted-average outstanding shares during the calculation period. This maximum potential dilution will only result if all restricted stock-based awards vest and stock options are exercised and restricted stock-based awards vest.exercised. Of the outstanding stock options at May 31, 2013,2016, which generally have a 10-yearten-year exercise period, less than 2%13.3% have exercise prices higher than the current market price of our common stock.stock on such date. In recent years, our stock repurchase program has more than offset the dilutive effect of our stock-based compensation program; however, we may reduce the level of our stock repurchases in the future, as we may use our available cash for acquisitions, to pay dividends, to repay or repurchase indebtedness or for other purposes. At May 31, 2013,2016, the maximum potential dilution from all outstanding restricted stock-based awards and unexercised stock options, and restricted stock-based awards, regardless of when granted and regardless of whether vested or unvested and including stock options where the strike price is higher than the current market price as of such date, was 9.6%10.3%.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and approves the organization-wide stock optionstock-based award grants to selected employees, all stock optionstock-based award grants to executive officers and any individual stock option grantsgrant of stock-based awards in excess of 100,000 stock option equivalent shares. A separate Plan Committee, which is an executive officer committee, approves individual stock optionstock-based award grants of up to 100,000 stock option equivalentshares to non-executive officers and employees. Stock option and restrictedRestricted stock-based award and stock option activity from June 1, 20102013 through May 31, 20132016 is summarized as follows (shares in millions):
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ( | ) | ||
Forfeitures, cancellations and other, net | ( | ) | ||
|
| |||
| ||||
|
| |||
| ||||
| ( | ) | ||
Shares outstanding at May 31, | ||||
Basic | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Our Compensation Committee approves the annual organization-wide optionstock-based award grants to certain employees. These annual optionstock-based award grants are generally made during the ten business day period following the second trading day after the announcement of our fiscal fourth quarter earnings report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Marketable Securities and Interest Income Risk
Our bank deposits and money market investmentstime deposits are generally held with large, diverse financial institutions worldwide with high investment-grade credit ratings or financial institutions that meet investment-grade ratings criteria, which we believe mitigates credit risk and certain other risks. In addition, we purchaseas of May 31, 2016, substantially all of our marketable securities are high quality debt security investments,with approximately 91% of which have28% having maturity dates within one year of May 31, 2013 (see aand 72% having maturity dates within one to six years (a description of our debtmarketable securities held is included in NotesNote 3 and Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above). Therefore,We hold a mix of both fixed and floating-rate debt securities. The fair values of our fixed-rate debt securities are impacted by interest rate movements generally do not materially affectand if interest rates would have been higher by 50 basis points as of May 31, 2016, we estimate the valuationchange would have decreased the fair values of our marketable securities holdings by $282 million. Our floating-rate debt security investments.securities serve to lower the overall risk to our investments portfolio associated with the risk of rising interest rates. Substantially all of our marketable securities are designated as available-for-sale. We generally do not use our investments for trading purposes.
Changes in the overall level of interest rates affect the interest income that is generated from our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. For fiscal 2013,2016, total interest income was $237$538 million with our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities investments yielding an average 0.71%1.16% on a worldwide basis. The table below presents the approximate fair values of our cash, cash equivalentequivalents and marketable securities and the related weighted averageweighted-average interest rates for our investment portfolio at May 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015.
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Fair Value | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Fair Value | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Fair Value | Weighted- Average Interest Rate | Fair Value | Weighted- Average Interest Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,613 | 0.50% | $ | 14,955 | 0.61% | $ | 20,152 | 0.35% | $ | 21,716 | 0.36% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable securities | 17,603 | 0.88% | 15,721 | 0.80% | 35,973 | 1.62% | 32,652 | 1.07% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 32,216 | 0.71% | $ | 30,676 | 0.71% | $ | 56,125 | 1.16% | $ | 54,368 | 0.79% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense Risk
Interest Expense Risk—Fixed to Variable Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Our total borrowings were $18.5$43.9 billion as of May 31, 2013, all2016, consisting of which were fixed rate borrowings. Future changes in interest rates$37.8 billion of fixed-rate borrowings, $2.3 billion of floating-rate borrowings (Floating-Rate Notes) and resulting changes in estimated fair values$3.8 billion of ourshort-term borrowings other than our senior notes due July 2014 (2014 Notes) would not impact the interest expense we recognize in our consolidated statements of operations. under a revolving credit agreement (Short-Term Borrowings).
We have entered into certain fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements to managethat have the interest rateeconomic effect of modifying the fixed-interest obligations associated with our $1.5 billion of 2.375% senior notes due January 2019 (January 2019 Notes), our $2.0 billion of 2.25% senior notes due October 2019 (October 2019 Notes), and related fair valueour $1.5 billion of our 2014 Notes2.80% senior notes due July 2021 (July 2021 Notes) so that the interest payable on the 2014 Notesthese senior notes effectively became variable based on LIBOR. The critical terms of the interest rate swap agreements match the critical terms of the January 2019 Notes, October 2019 Notes, and July 2021 Notes that the interest rate swap agreements pertain to, including the notional amounts and maturity dates. We do not use these interest rate swap arrangements or our fixed ratefixed-rate borrowings for trading purposes. We have designated these swap agreements as qualifying hedging instruments and are accounting for themthese interest rate swap agreements as fair value hedges pursuant to ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). These transactions are characterized asThe total fair value hedges for financial accounting purposes because they protect us against changes in the fair valuegain of our 2014 Notes duethese fixed to benchmarkvariable interest rate movements. The changes inswap agreements as of May 31, 2016 was $122 million. If LIBOR-based interest rates would have been higher by 100 basis points as of May 31, 2016, the change would have decreased the fair values of thesethe fixed to variable swap agreements by $185 million. Additional details regarding our senior notes and related interest rate swap agreements are recognized as interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations with the corresponding amounts included in other assets or other non-current liabilitiesNotes 8 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in our consolidated balance sheets. The amount of net gain (loss) attributable to the risk being hedged is recognized as interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations with the corresponding amount included in notes payable and other non-current borrowings. The periodic interest settlements for the swap agreements, which occur at the same interval as those per the 2014 Notes, are recorded as interest expense.this Annual Report.
By issuing the Floating-Rate Notes and the Short-Term Borrowings, and by entering into thesethe aforementioned interest rate swap arrangements, we have assumed risks associated with variable interest rates based upon LIBOR. Our 2014 Notes had an effective interest rate of 1.34% asAs of May 31, 2013,2016, the weighted-average interest rate associated with our Floating-Rate Notes, Short-Term Borrowings and January 2019 Notes, October 2019 Notes and July 2021 Notes, after considering the effects of the aforementioned interest rate swap arrangements.arrangements, was 1.14%. Changes in the overall level of interest rates affect the interest expense that we recognize in our statements of operations. An interest rate risk sensitivity analysis is used to measure interest rate risk by computing estimated changes in cash flows as a result of assumed changes in market interest rates. As of May 31, 2013,2016, if LIBOR-based interest rates increasedwould have been higher by 100 basis points, the change would increasehave increased our interest expense annually by approximately $15$76 million as it relates to our fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements.agreements and floating-rate borrowings.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign Currency Transaction Risk—Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
We transact business in various foreign currencies and have established a program that primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures. Under this program, our strategy is to enter into foreign currency forward contracts so that increases or decreases in our foreign currency exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with our foreign currency
transactions. We may suspend this program from time to time. Our foreign currency exposures typically arise from intercompany sublicense fees, intercompany loans and other intercompany transactions that are expected to be cash settled in the near term.transactions. Our foreign currency forward contracts are generally short-term in duration.
We neitherNeither do we use these foreign currency forward contracts for trading purposes nor do we designate these forward contracts as hedging instruments pursuant to ASC 815. Accordingly, we record the fair values of these contracts as of the end of our reporting period to our consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair values recorded to our consolidated statement of operations. Given the short duration of the forward contracts, amounts recorded generally are not significant. The balance sheet classification for the fair values of these forward contracts is prepaid expenses and other current assets for a netforward contracts in an unrealized gain position and other current liabilities for a netforward contracts in an unrealized loss position. The statement of operations classification for changes in fair values of these forward contracts is non-operating income (expense), net for both realized and unrealized gains and losses.
We expect that we will continue to realize gains or losses with respect to our foreign currency exposures, net of gains or losses from our foreign currency forward contracts. Our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to foreign currency exposures will generally depend on the size and type of cross-currency transactions that we enter into, the currency exchange rates associated with these exposures and changes in those rates, the net realized gain or loss on our foreign currency forward contracts and other factors. As of both May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, the notional amounts of the forward contracts we held to purchase U.S. Dollars in exchange for other major international currencies were $3.0 billion.$2.7 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. As of May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, the notional amounts of forward contracts we held to sell U.S. Dollars in exchange for other major international currencies were $1.1$2.0 billion and $873 million,$1.2 billion, respectively. The fair values of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were nominal at May 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015. Net foreign exchange transaction (losses) gainslosses included in non-operating income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $(162)$110 million, $(105)$157 million and $11$375 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Included in the net foreign exchange transaction losses for fiscal 20132016, 2015 and 2014 were foreign currency remeasurement losses relating to our Venezuelan subsidiary’s operations which are more thoroughly described under “Non-Operating Income, net”of $7 million, $23 million and $213 million, respectively (see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above.this Annual Report for additional information). As a large portion of our consolidated operations are international, we could experience additional foreign currency volatility in the future, the amounts and timing of which are uncertain.unknown.
Foreign Currency Translation RiskRisk—Impact on Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Fluctuations in foreign currencies impact the amount of total assets and liabilities that we report for our foreign subsidiaries upon the translation of these amounts into U.S. Dollars. In particular, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities that we report in U.S. Dollars for a significant portion of the cash held by these subsidiaries is subject to translation variance caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates as of the end of each respective reporting period (the offset to which is substantially recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) incomeloss on our consolidated balance sheet and is also presented as a line item in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income included elsewhere in this Annual Report). Periodically, we may hedge net assets of certain international subsidiaries from foreign currency exposure.
As the U.S. Dollar fluctuated against certain international currencies as of the end of fiscal 2013,2016, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities that we reported in U.S. Dollars for foreign subsidiaries that hold international currencies as of May 31, 20132016 decreased relative to what we would have reported using a constant currency rate as of May 31, 2012.2015. As reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows, the estimated effecteffects of exchange rate changes on our reported cash and cash equivalents balances in U.S. Dollars for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011 was a (decrease) increase2014 were decreases of $(110)$115 million, $(471) million$1.2 billion and $600$158 million, respectively. The following table includes estimates of the U.S. Dollar equivalent of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities denominated in certain major foreign currencies that we held as of May 31, 2013:2016:
(in millions) | U.S. Dollar Equivalent at May 31, 2013 | |||
Euro | $ | 1,409 | ||
Chinese Renminbi | 1,041 | |||
Indian Rupee | 1,015 | |||
Australian Dollar | 681 | |||
Japanese Yen | 428 | |||
South African Rand | 309 | |||
British Pound | 259 | |||
Canadian Dollar | 233 | |||
Other foreign currencies | 1,784 | |||
|
| |||
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities denominated in foreign currencies | $ | 7,159 | ||
|
| |||
(in millions) Euro Japanese Yen Indian Rupee Chinese Renminbi Canadian Dollar British Pound Swiss Franc Australian Dollar Other foreign currencies Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities denominated in foreign currencies U.S. Dollar
Equivalent at
May 31, 2016 $ 2,430 618 493 442 369 262 191 184 1,806 $ 6,795
If overall foreign currency exchange rates in comparison to the U.S. Dollar uniformly weakenedwould have been weaker by 10%, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities we would report in U.S. Dollars would decreasehave decreased by approximately $716$680 million, assuming constant foreign currency cash, cash equivalentequivalents and marketable securities balances.
Foreign Currency Translation Risk—Net Investment Hedge
In July 2013, we issued €750 million of 3.125% senior notes due July 2025 (July 2025 Notes). We designated the July 2025 Notes as a net investment hedge of our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency in order to reduce the volatility in stockholders’ equity caused by the changes in foreign currency exchange rates of the Euro with respect to the U.S. Dollar. As a result, provided there is no ineffectiveness related to the hedge, the change in the carrying value of the Euro-denominated July 2025 Notes due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on the effective portion is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheet and is also presented as a line item in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income included elsewhere in this Annual Report and totaled $25 million of net other comprehensive losses for fiscal 2016. Any remaining change in the carrying value of the July 2025 Notes representing any ineffective portion of the net investment hedge is recognized in non-operating income (expense), net. We did not record any ineffectiveness during fiscal 2016.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the Euro and the U.S. Dollar will impact the amount of U.S. Dollars that we will require to settle the July 2025 Notes at maturity. If the U.S. Dollar would have been weaker by 10% in comparison to the Euro as of May 31, 2016, we estimate our obligation to cash settle the principal portion of the July 2025 Notes in U.S. Dollars would have increased by approximately $84 million.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this Annual Report. See Part IV, Item 15.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and our management, including our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer andOfficers (one of whom is our President and ChiefPrincipal Financial Officer,Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and President and ChiefOfficers (one of whom is our Principal Financial Officer,Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of disclosure controls includes an evaluation of some components of our internal control over financial reporting. We also perform a separate annual evaluation of internal control over financial reporting for the purpose of providing the management report below.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls included a review of their objectives and design, our implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the course of the controls evaluation, we reviewed data errors or control problems identified and sought to confirm that appropriate corrective actions, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and President and ChiefOfficers (one of whom is our Principal Financial Officer,Officer), concerning the effectiveness of the disclosure controls can be reported in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K. Many of the components of our disclosure controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by both our internal audit and finance organizations. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls and to modify them as necessary. We intend to maintain our disclosure controls as dynamic processes and procedures that we adjust as circumstances merit.
Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer andOfficers, one of whom is our President and ChiefPrincipal Financial Officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and our President and Chief Financial OfficerOfficers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and President and ChiefOfficers (one of whom is our Principal Financial Officer,Officer), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 20132016 based on the guidelines established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s 19922013 framework. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP.
Based on the results of our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2013.2016. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with our Finance and Audit Committee.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 20132016 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer and President and ChiefOfficers (one of whom is our Principal Financial Officer,Officer), believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision makingdecision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effectivecost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Disclosure pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Oracle has a robust economic sanctions and export controls program designed to ensure compliance with U.S. and other applicable export laws and regulations by Oracle and its resellers, distributors and customers. As part of our ongoing efforts to monitor and review transactions to ensure the effectiveness of our trade compliance program, we discovered the two (2) matters described below which occurred during fiscal 2013.
We recently identified an order placed in February 2013 for $1,541.05 for one of our database software products by a non-U.S. third party reseller through a non-U.S. third party partner on behalf of an entity that is an overseas branch location (outside of Iran) of a financial institution owned or controlled by the Government of Iran that has been designated pursuant to Executive Order 13224. Our software was included as part of an overall banking software solution being licensed from the non-U.S. reseller to this entity, and the Oracle software constituted a very small component – approximately 2% of the cost – of the overall solution. To our knowledge, no employees of Oracle had any contact with this entity during fiscal 2013. Upon learning of this order and verifying the identity of this entity, we deactivated this entity in our ordering systems and terminated all business activities involving this entity. Oracle does not intend to continue this activity or to knowingly permit any activities with this entity in the future. We have implemented additional measures designed to prevent such activity from recurring. We are unable to calculate the net profits attributable to this activity, but such net profits would be less than the revenues.
We also identified a transaction for $5,516.52 between Oracle and the United Arab Emirates office of an insurance company owned or controlled by the Government of Iran. In March 2013, this entity renewed its support contract for our database and middleware software products that this entity had licensed through various non-U.S. third party partners and resellers prior to the date such entity was formally designated as owned or controlled by the Government of Iran. No employees of Oracle providedany customer support services to this entity during fiscal 2013. Upon learning of this support renewal, we terminated the support contract, deactivated this entity in our ordering systems and terminated all business activities involving this entity. Oracle does not intend to continue this activity or to knowingly permit any activities with this entity in the future. We have implemented additional measures designed to prevent such activity from recurring. We are unable to calculate the net profits attributable to this activity, but such net profits would be less than the revenues.
We have made voluntary disclosure of these matters to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of Treasury and intend to cooperate fully with OFAC.None.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information required by this item relating to our executive officers is included under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I of this Annual Report.
The other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2013(2016 Proxy Statement”)Statement) under the sections entitled “Board of Directors—Nominees for Directors,” “Board of Directors—Committees, Membership and Meetings—Committee Memberships During Fiscal 2013,Meetings,” “Board of Directors—Committees, Membership and Meetings—The Finance and Audit Committee,” “Corporate Governance—Employee Matters—Code of Conduct,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”.Compliance.”
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the information to be contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement under the sections entitled “Board of Directors—Committees, Membership and Meetings—The Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Board of Directors—Director Compensation,” and “Executive Compensation”.Compensation.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the information to be contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement under the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information”.Information.”
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from the information to be contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement under the sections entitled “Corporate Governance—Board of Directors and Director Independence” and “Transactions with Related Persons”.Persons.”
Item 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the information to be contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.Firm.”
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The following financial statements are filed as a part of this report:
2. Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedule is filed as a part of this report:
| The following financial statement schedule is filed as a part of this report: | ||||
| Page | ||||
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
The information required by this Item is set forth in the Index of Exhibits that follows the signature page of this Annual Report.
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Oracle Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Oracle Corporation as of May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2013.2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) 2. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Oracle Corporation at May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Oracle Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) and our report dated June 26, 201322, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNSTErnst & YOUNGYoung LLP
San Jose, California
June 26, 201322, 2016
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Oracle Corporation
We have audited Oracle Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Oracle Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Oracle Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013,2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Oracle Corporation as of May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 20132016 of Oracle Corporation and our report dated June 26, 201322, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNSTErnst & YOUNGYoung LLP
San Jose, California
June 26, 201322, 2016
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of May 31, 20132016 and 20122015
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,613 | $ | 14,955 | $ | 20,152 | $ | 21,716 | ||||||||
Marketable securities | 17,603 | 15,721 | 35,973 | 32,652 | ||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $296 and $323 as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 6,049 | 6,377 | ||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $327 and $285 as of May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively | 5,385 | 5,618 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories | 240 | 158 | 212 | 314 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 974 | 877 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,213 | 1,935 | 2,591 | 2,220 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total current assets | 41,692 | 40,023 | 64,313 | 62,520 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Non-current assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 3,053 | 3,021 | 4,000 | 3,686 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net | 6,640 | 7,899 | 4,943 | 6,406 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | 27,343 | 25,119 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net | 34,590 | 34,087 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 766 | 595 | 1,291 | 1,458 | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 2,318 | 1,670 | 3,043 | 2,746 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total non-current assets | 40,120 | 38,304 | 47,867 | 48,383 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 81,812 | $ | 78,327 | $ | 112,180 | $ | 110,903 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes payable, current and other current borrowings | $ | — | $ | 2,950 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable, current | $ | 3,750 | $ | 1,999 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | 419 | 438 | 504 | 806 | ||||||||||||
Accrued compensation and related benefits | 1,851 | 2,002 | 1,966 | 1,839 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes payable | 911 | 528 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred revenues | 7,118 | 7,035 | 7,655 | 7,245 | ||||||||||||
Other current liabilities | 2,573 | 2,435 | 3,333 | 3,317 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 12,872 | 15,388 | 17,208 | 15,206 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes payable and other non-current borrowings | 18,494 | 13,524 | ||||||||||||||
Notes payable, non-current | 40,105 | 39,959 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable | 3,899 | 3,759 | 4,908 | 4,386 | ||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities | 1,402 | 1,569 | 2,169 | 2,254 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total non-current liabilities | 23,795 | 18,852 | 47,182 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||||||||||
Oracle Corporation stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value—authorized: 1.0 shares; outstanding: none | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value and additional paid in capital—authorized: 11,000 shares; outstanding: 4,646 shares and 4,905 shares as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 18,893 | 17,489 | ||||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value and additional paid in capital—authorized: 11,000 shares; outstanding: 4,131 shares and 4,343 shares as of May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively | 24,217 | 23,156 | ||||||||||||||
Retained earnings | 25,854 | 26,087 | 23,888 | 26,503 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (99 | ) | 112 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (816 | ) | (996 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Oracle Corporation stockholders’ equity | 44,648 | 43,688 | 47,289 | 48,663 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 497 | 399 | 501 | 435 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total equity | 45,145 | 44,087 | 47,790 | 49,098 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 81,812 | $ | 78,327 | $ | 112,180 | $ | 110,903 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions | $ | 10,321 | $ | 9,906 | $ | 9,235 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service | $ | 2,207 | $ | 1,485 | $ | 1,121 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service | 646 | 608 | 456 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cloud revenues | 2,853 | 2,093 | 1,577 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses | 7,276 | 8,535 | 9,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | 17,142 | 16,210 | 14,796 | 18,861 | 18,847 | 18,206 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Software revenues | 27,463 | 26,116 | 24,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems products | 3,033 | 3,827 | 4,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support | 2,313 | 2,475 | 2,562 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total on-premise software revenues | 26,137 | 27,382 | 27,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems revenues | 5,346 | 6,302 | 6,944 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Services revenues | 4,371 | 4,703 | 4,647 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total cloud and on-premise software revenues | 28,990 | 29,475 | 29,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products | 2,471 | 2,825 | 2,976 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support | 2,197 | 2,380 | 2,396 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hardware revenues | 4,668 | 5,205 | 5,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total services revenues | 3,389 | 3,546 | 3,704 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 37,180 | 37,121 | 35,622 | 37,047 | 38,226 | 38,275 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing(1) | 7,328 | 7,127 | 6,579 | 7,884 | 7,655 | 7,567 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service(1) | 1,152 | 773 | 455 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service(1) | 366 | 344 | 308 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support(1) | 1,175 | 1,226 | 1,264 | 1,146 | 1,199 | 1,162 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems products(1) | 1,501 | 1,843 | 2,057 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support(1) | 890 | 1,046 | 1,259 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products(1) | 1,371 | 1,471 | 1,521 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support(1) | 693 | 816 | 836 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Services(1) | 3,547 | 3,743 | 3,818 | 2,751 | 2,929 | 2,954 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 4,850 | 4,523 | 4,519 | 5,787 | 5,524 | 5,151 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,072 | 1,126 | 970 | 1,155 | 1,077 | 1,038 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,385 | 2,430 | 2,428 | 1,638 | 2,149 | 2,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other | (604 | ) | 56 | 208 | 42 | 211 | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | 352 | 295 | 487 | 458 | 207 | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 22,496 | 23,415 | 23,589 | 24,443 | 24,355 | 23,516 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 14,684 | 13,706 | 12,033 | 12,604 | 13,871 | 14,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (797 | ) | (766 | ) | (808 | ) | (1,467 | ) | (1,143 | ) | (914 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-operating income, net | 11 | 22 | 186 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense), net | 305 | 106 | (141 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 13,898 | 12,962 | 11,411 | 11,442 | 12,834 | 13,704 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 2,973 | 2,981 | 2,864 | 2,541 | 2,896 | 2,749 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.29 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 2.42 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.38 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 4,769 | 5,015 | 5,048 | 4,221 | 4,404 | 4,528 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 4,844 | 5,095 | 5,128 | 4,305 | 4,503 | 4,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Exclusive of amortization of intangible assets, which is shown |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | ||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||
Net foreign currency translation (losses) gains | (123 | ) | (398 | ) | 480 | |||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on defined benefit plans | (68 | ) | (102 | ) | 32 | |||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities | (20 | ) | 70 | 26 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net | (211 | ) | (430 | ) | 538 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 10,714 | $ | 9,551 | $ | 9,085 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | ||||||
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||||||
Net foreign currency translation gains (losses) | 73 | (770 | ) | (78 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on defined benefit plans | 50 | (151 | ) | 23 | ||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities | 72 | 59 | (15 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges | (15 | ) | 30 | 5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total other comprehensive gain (loss), net | 180 | (832 | ) | (65 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 9,081 | $ | 9,106 | $ | 10,890 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014
| Common Stock and Additional Paid in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income | Total Oracle Corporation Stockholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity | Common Stock and Additional Paid in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total Oracle Corporation Stockholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2010 | 5,026 | $ | 14,648 | $ | 16,146 | $ | 4 | $ | 30,798 | $ | 401 | $ | 31,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2013 | 4,646 | $ | 18,893 | $ | 25,854 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 44,648 | $ | 497 | $ | 45,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans | 78 | 1,281 | — | — | 1,281 | — | 1,281 | 95 | 2,046 | — | — | 2,046 | — | 2,046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock purchase plans | 4 | 95 | — | — | 95 | — | 95 | 3 | 109 | — | — | 109 | — | 109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumption of stock-based compensation plan awards in connection with acquisitions | — | 17 | — | — | 17 | — | 17 | — | 148 | — | — | 148 | — | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | 510 | — | — | 510 | — | 510 | — | 805 | — | — | 805 | — | 805 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (40 | ) | (121 | ) | (1,051 | ) | — | (1,172 | ) | — | (1,172 | ) | (280 | ) | (1,160 | ) | (8,638 | ) | — | (9,798 | ) | — | (9,798 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.21 per share) | — | — | (1,061 | ) | — | (1,061 | ) | — | (1,061 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock plans | — | 222 | — | — | 222 | — | 222 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | (65 | ) | (65 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net | — | — | — | 538 | 538 | 35 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 8,547 | — | 8,547 | 97 | 8,644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2011 | 5,068 | 16,653 | 22,581 | 542 | 39,776 | 469 | 40,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans | 40 | 622 | — | — | 622 | — | 622 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock purchase plans | 4 | 111 | — | — | 111 | — | 111 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumption of stock-based compensation plan awards in connection with acquisitions | — | 29 | — | — | 29 | — | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | 659 | — | — | 659 | — | 659 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (207 | ) | (698 | ) | (5,270 | ) | — | (5,968 | ) | — | (5,968 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.24 per share) | — | — | (1,205 | ) | — | (1,205 | ) | — | (1,205 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings upon vesting of restricted stock-based awards | — | (20 | ) | — | — | (20 | ) | — | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.48 per share) | — | — | (2,178 | ) | — | (2,178 | ) | — | (2,178 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock plans | — | 113 | — | — | 113 | — | 113 | — | 254 | — | — | 254 | — | 254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | (28 | ) | — | (26 | ) | 12 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | (163 | ) | (163 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (28 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net | — | — | — | (430 | ) | (430 | ) | (28 | ) | (458 | ) | — | — | — | (65 | ) | (65 | ) | (10 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 9,981 | — | 9,981 | 119 | 10,100 | — | — | 10,955 | — | 10,955 | 98 | 11,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2012 | 4,905 | 17,489 | 26,087 | 112 | 43,688 | 399 | 44,087 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2014 | 4,464 | 21,077 | 25,965 | (164 | ) | 46,878 | 569 | 47,447 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans | 84 | 1,417 | — | — | 1,417 | — | 1,417 | 70 | 1,702 | — | — | 1,702 | — | 1,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock purchase plans | 3 | 110 | — | — | 110 | — | 110 | 3 | 114 | — | — | 114 | — | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumption of stock-based compensation plan awards in connection with acquisitions | — | 15 | — | — | 15 | — | 15 | — | 12 | — | — | 12 | — | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | 755 | — | — | 755 | — | 755 | — | 933 | — | — | 933 | — | 933 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (346 | ) | (1,269 | ) | (9,725 | ) | — | (10,994 | ) | — | (10,994 | ) | (194 | ) | (943 | ) | (7,145 | ) | — | (8,088 | ) | — | (8,088 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.30 per share) | — | — | (1,433 | ) | — | (1,433 | ) | — | (1,433 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings upon vesting of restricted stock-based awards | — | (14 | ) | — | — | (14 | ) | — | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.51 per share) | — | — | (2,255 | ) | — | (2,255 | ) | — | (2,255 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock plans | — | 257 | — | — | 257 | — | 257 | — | 267 | — | — | 267 | — | 267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | 119 | — | — | 119 | 66 | 185 | — | 8 | — | — | 8 | 15 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | (31 | ) | (31 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (196 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net | — | — | — | (211 | ) | (211 | ) | (49 | ) | (260 | ) | — | — | — | (832 | ) | (832 | ) | (66 | ) | (898 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 10,925 | — | 10,925 | 112 | 11,037 | — | — | 9,938 | — | 9,938 | 113 | 10,051 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2013 | 4,646 | $ | 18,893 | $ | 25,854 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 44,648 | $ | 497 | $ | 45,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2015 | 4,343 | 23,156 | 26,503 | (996 | ) | 48,663 | 435 | 49,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock-based compensation plans | 60 | 1,304 | — | — | 1,304 | — | 1,304 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock purchase plans | 3 | 121 | — | — | 121 | — | 121 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumption of stock-based compensation plan awards in connection with acquisitions | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | 1,037 | — | — | 1,037 | — | 1,037 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (272 | ) | (1,464 | ) | (8,975 | ) | — | (10,439 | ) | — | (10,439 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings upon vesting of restricted stock-based awards | (3 | ) | (89 | ) | — | — | (89 | ) | — | (89 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.60 per share) | — | — | (2,541 | ) | — | (2,541 | ) | — | (2,541 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock plans | — | 141 | — | — | 141 | — | 141 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | — | 10 | — | — | 10 | 9 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | (85 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive gain, net | — | — | — | 180 | 180 | 26 | 206 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 8,901 | — | 8,901 | 116 | 9,017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2016 | 4,131 | $ | 24,217 | $ | 23,888 | $ | (816 | ) | $ | 47,289 | $ | 501 | $ | 47,790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 546 | 486 | 368 | 871 | 712 | 608 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,385 | 2,430 | 2,428 | 1,638 | 2,149 | 2,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable | 118 | 92 | 164 | 130 | 56 | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (117 | ) | 9 | (253 | ) | (105 | ) | (548 | ) | (248 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 755 | 659 | 510 | 1,037 | 933 | 805 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock-based awards | 410 | 182 | 325 | 311 | 396 | 480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock-based awards | (241 | ) | (97 | ) | (215 | ) | (124 | ) | (244 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other, net | 155 | 84 | 68 | 143 | 327 | 311 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables | 267 | (8 | ) | (729 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories | (66 | ) | 150 | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | (555 | ) | (51 | ) | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities | (541 | ) | (720 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in trade receivables | 96 | 208 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in inventories | 88 | (96 | ) | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets | (90 | ) | (387 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other liabilities | (13 | ) | 247 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable | 35 | 54 | (96 | ) | 2 | (10 | ) | (320 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Increase in deferred revenues | 148 | 492 | 231 | 676 | 655 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 14,224 | 13,743 | 11,214 | 13,561 | 14,336 | 14,921 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of marketable securities and other investments | (32,160 | ) | (38,625 | ) | (31,009 | ) | (24,562 | ) | (31,421 | ) | (32,316 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities and other investments | 30,159 | 35,594 | 27,120 | 21,247 | 20,004 | 28,845 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (3,305 | ) | (4,702 | ) | (1,847 | ) | (650 | ) | (6,239 | ) | (3,488 | ) | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (650 | ) | (648 | ) | (450 | ) | (1,189 | ) | (1,391 | ) | (580 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property | — | — | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (5,956 | ) | (8,381 | ) | (6,081 | ) | (5,154 | ) | (19,047 | ) | (7,539 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments for repurchases of common stock | (11,021 | ) | (5,856 | ) | (1,160 | ) | (10,440 | ) | (8,087 | ) | (9,813 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuances of common stock | 1,527 | 733 | 1,376 | 1,425 | 1,816 | 2,155 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings upon vesting of restrictedstock-based awards | (89 | ) | (14 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments of dividends to stockholders | (1,433 | ) | (1,205 | ) | (1,061 | ) | (2,541 | ) | (2,255 | ) | (2,178 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings, net of issuance costs | 4,974 | 1,700 | 4,354 | 3,750 | 19,842 | 5,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of borrowings | (2,950 | ) | (1,405 | ) | (3,143 | ) | (2,000 | ) | (1,500 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock-based awards | 241 | 97 | 215 | 124 | 244 | 250 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (31 | ) | (163 | ) | (65 | ) | (85 | ) | (196 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other, net | 193 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | (8,500 | ) | (6,099 | ) | 516 | (9,856 | ) | 9,850 | (4,068 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (110 | ) | (471 | ) | 600 | (115 | ) | (1,192 | ) | (158 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (342 | ) | (1,208 | ) | 6,249 | (1,564 | ) | 3,947 | 3,156 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 14,955 | 16,163 | 9,914 | 21,716 | 17,769 | 14,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 14,613 | $ | 14,955 | $ | 16,163 | $ | 20,152 | $ | 21,716 | $ | 17,769 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash investing and financing transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed in connection with acquisitions | $ | 15 | $ | 29 | $ | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of contingent consideration payable in connection with acquisition | $ | — | $ | 346 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair values of restricted stock-based awards and stock options assumed in connection with acquisitions | $ | 1 | $ | 12 | $ | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in unsettled repurchases of common stock | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 112 | $ | 12 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (15 | ) | |||||||||
(Decrease) increase in unsettled investment purchases | $ | (112 | ) | $ | 264 | $ | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Supplemental schedule of cash flow data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 2,644 | $ | 2,731 | $ | 2,931 | $ | 2,331 | $ | 3,055 | $ | 2,841 | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 781 | $ | 737 | $ | 770 | $ | 1,616 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 827 | ||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 20132016
| 1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Oracle Corporation develops, manufactures, markets, sells, hosts and supports application, platform and infrastructure technologies for information technology (IT) environments including database and middleware software, applicationsapplication software, cloud infrastructure and hardware—including Oracle Engineered Systems, computer server, storage, networking and industry-specific hardware systems products products—and related services that are engineered to work together in cloud-based and on-premise information technology (IT)IT environments. We offer our customers the option to deploy our comprehensive set of cloud services offerings including Oracle Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) or to purchase our software and hardware systems products and related services to manage their own cloud-based or on-premise IT environments, or to deploy our Oracle Cloud offerings, which are a comprehensive set of cloud service offerings including application services, social services, platform services, and common infrastructure services on a subscription basis that we manage, host and support.environments. Customers that purchase our software products may elect to purchase software license updates and product support contracts, which provide our customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases issued during the support period as well as technical support assistance. Customers that purchase our hardware products may elect to purchase hardware systems support contracts, which provide customers with software updates for software components that are essential to the functionality of our server, storage and networkinghardware products, such as Oracle Solaris and certain other software products, and can include product repairs, maintenance services, and technical support services. We also offer customers a broad set of services offerings that are designed to improve customer utilization of their investments in Oracle application, platform and infrastructure technologies including consulting services, managed cloudadvanced customer support services and education services.
Oracle Corporation conducts business globally and was incorporated in 2005 as a Delaware corporation and is the successor to operations originally begun in June 1977.
Basis of Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements included our accounts and the accounts of our wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries. Noncontrolling interest positions of certain of our consolidated entities are reported as a separate component of consolidated equity from the equity attributable to Oracle’s stockholders for all periods presented. The noncontrolling interests in our net income were not significant to our consolidated results for the periods presented and therefore have been included as a component of non-operating income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain other prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year’syear presentation. Such reclassifications did not affect our consolidated total revenues, consolidated operating income or consolidated net income. Acquisition
Included in acquisition related and other expenses as presented in our consolidated statementstatements of operations for fiscal 2013 included a change in fair value of contingent consideration payable, which resulted in a net2016 and 2015 are an acquisition related benefit of $387$19 million in fiscal 2013 (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements below), and a $306litigation related benefit of $53 million, benefit that we recorded inrespectively. Further, acquisition related and other expenses for fiscal 20132015 included $186 million related to certain litigation (seea goodwill impairment loss (refer to Note 187 below for additional information).
In fiscal 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-17,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements below). GeneralDeferred Taxes(ASU 2015-17) on a retrospective basis. As required by ASU 2015-17, all deferred tax assets and administrative expensesliabilities are classified as presentednon-current in our consolidated statementbalance sheets, which is a change from our historical presentation whereby certain of our deferred tax assets and liabilities were classified as current and the remainder were classified as non-current. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-17, current deferred tax assets of $663 million and current deferred tax liabilities of $85 million in our May 31, 2015 consolidated balance sheet were reclassified as non-current and certain related reclassification entries were also recorded.
In addition, in fiscal 2016, we also adopted the following Accounting Standards Updates, none of which had a material impact to our reported financial position or results of operations for fiscal 2011 included a benefit of $120 million related to the recovery of legal costs that reduced our expenses in that period.and cash flows:
| • | ASU 2016-07,Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323):Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting; |
ORACLE CORPORATION
Pursuant to our adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Incomeand Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, we elected to present separate consolidated statements of comprehensive income for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| • | ASU 2016-06,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments; |
| • | ASU 2016-05,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships; |
| • | ASU 2015-16,Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments; |
| • | ASU 2015-15,Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements—Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting; |
| • | ASU 2015-11,Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory; and |
| • | ASU 2015-05, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. |
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), and we consider the various staff accounting bulletins and other applicable guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Commission. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent that there are differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Revenue Recognition
Our sources of revenues include: (1)
cloud and on-premise software revenues, which includesinclude the sale of: new software licenses, revenues earned from granting licenseswhich generally grant to customers a perpetual right to use our database, middleware, applications and industry-specific software productsproducts; cloud SaaS and fees fromPaaS offerings, which grant customers access to a broad range of our software and related support offerings on a subscription basis in a secure, standards-based cloud computing environment; cloud IaaS offerings, which grant customers access to infrastructure cloud services to perform elastic compute, storage and networking services, and also provide management services for software subscriptions offerings,and hardware and related IT infrastructure, both generally on a subscription basis; and software license updates and product support revenues; (2) offerings (described further below);
hardware systems,revenues, which includesinclude the sale of hardware systems products including Oracle Engineered Systems, computer servers, storage products, networking and data center fabric products, and fees from infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) offerings,industry-specific hardware; and hardware systems support revenues;revenues (described further below); and (3)
services revenues, which includesare earned from providing software and hardware related services including consulting, managed cloud servicesadvanced customer support and education revenues. services.
Revenues generally are recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Revenue Recognition for Software Products and Software Related Services (Software Elements)
New software licenses revenues primarily represent fees earned from granting customers licenses to use our database, middleware, application and applicationsindustry-specific software products and exclude cloud software subscriptionsSaaS and PaaS revenues and revenues derived from software license updates, which are included in software license updates and product support revenues. The basis for our new software licenses revenue recognition is substantially governed by the accounting guidance contained in ASC 985-605,Software-Revenue RecognitionRecognition.. We exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of software and software related services revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.
For software license arrangements that do not require significant modification or customization of the underlying software, we recognize new software licenses revenues when: (1) we enter into a legally binding arrangement with a customer for the license of software; (2) we deliver the products; (3) the sale price is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is probable. Revenues that are not recognized at the time of sale because the foregoing conditions are not met, are recognized when those conditions are subsequently met.
Substantially all of our software license arrangements do not include acceptance provisions. However, if acceptance provisions exist as part of public policy for(for example, in agreements with government entities where acceptance periods are required by law, or within previously executed terms and conditions that are referenced in the current agreement and are short-term in nature,nature), we generally recognize revenues upon delivery provided the acceptance terms are perfunctory and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If acceptance provisions are not perfunctory (for example, acceptance provisions that are long-term in nature or are not included as standard terms of an arrangement), revenues are recognized upon the earlier of receipt of written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
The vast majority of our software license arrangements include software license updates and product support contracts, which are entered into at the customer’s option, and the related fees are recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, typically one year. Software license updates provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades, maintenance releases and patches released during the term of the support period. Product support includes internet access to technical content, as well as internet and telephone access to technical support personnel. Software license updates and product support contracts are generally priced as a percentage of the net new software licenses fees.fees and are generally invoiced in full at the beginning of the support term. Substantially all of our customers renew their software license updates and product support contracts annually.
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Software Products and Software Related Services (Software Arrangements)
We often enter into arrangements with customers that purchase both software related products and software related services from us at the same time, or within close proximity of one another (referred to as software related multiple-element arrangements). Such software related multiple-element arrangements include the sale of our software products, software license updates and product support contracts and other software related services whereby software license delivery is followed by the subsequent or contemporaneous delivery of the other elements. For those software related multiple-element arrangements, we have applied the residual method to determine the amount of new software license revenues to be recognized pursuant to ASC 985-605. Under the residual method, if fair value exists for undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement, such fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred with the remaining portion of the arrangement consideration generally recognized upon delivery of the software license
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
or services arrangement.license. We allocate the fair value of each element of a software related multiple-element arrangement based upon its fair value as determined by our vendor specificvendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE—described further below), with any remaining amount allocated to the software license.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Revenue Recognition for Hardware Systems Products, Hardware Systems Related Services, Cloud Software SubscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS Offerings, (NonsoftwareHardware Products, Hardware Support and Related Services (Non-software Elements)
Revenues from the sale of hardware systems products represent amounts earned primarily from the sale of computer servers, storage, and networking products. Our revenue recognition policy for these nonsoftware deliverables and other nonsoftwarenon-software deliverables including cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings, hardware systemsproducts, support and related services and cloud software subscriptions offerings is based upon the accounting guidance contained in ASC 605,605-25,Revenue Recognition,Multiple-Element Arrangements, and we exercise judgment and use estimates in connection with the determination of the amount of cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS revenues, hardware systems products revenues, hardware systemssupport and related services revenues and cloud software subscriptions revenues to be recognized in each accounting period.
Revenues from the sales of our nonsoftwarenon-software elements are recognized when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) we deliver the products and passage of the title to the buyer occurs; (3) the sale price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues that are not recognized at the time of sale because the foregoing conditions are not met are recognized when those conditions are subsequently met. When applicable, we reduce revenues for estimated returns or certain other incentive programs where we have the ability to sufficiently estimate the effects of these items. Where an arrangement is subject to acceptance criteria and the acceptance provisions are not perfunctory (for example, acceptance provisions that are long-term in nature or are not included as standard terms of an arrangement), revenues are recognized upon the earlier of receipt of written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
Our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings generally provide customers access to certain of our software within a cloud-based IT environment that we manage, host and support and offer to customers on a subscription basis. Revenues for our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings are generally recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date the service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our cloud IaaS offerings provide infrastructure cloud services and also include deployment and management offerings for software and hardware systemsand related IT infrastructure. Our cloud IaaS offerings are generally sold on a subscription basis and revenues for these cloud IaaS offerings are generally recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date the service is made available to customers and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Revenues from the sale of hardware products represent amounts earned primarily from the sale of our Oracle Engineered Systems, computer servers, storage, networking and industry-specific hardware and are recognized upon the delivery of the hardware product to the customer provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our hardware support offerings generally provide customers with software updates for the software components that are essential to the functionality of our server and storagehardware products and can also include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services. Hardware systems support contracts are generally priced as a percentage of the net hardware systems products fees. Hardware systems support contracts are entered into at the customer’s option and are recognized ratably over the contractual term of the arrangements, which areis typically one year.
Our cloud software subscriptions offerings generally provide customers access to certain of our software within a cloud-based IT environment that we manage and offer to customers on a subscription basis. Revenues for our cloud software subscriptions offerings are recognized ratably over the contract term commencing with the date our service is made available to customers andyear, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
Our IaaS offerings are on-premise cloud offerings for deploying certain of Oracle’s Engineered Systems and support services to customers on a subscription basis. Customers that enter into IaaS arrangements are also able to purchase additional capacity on demand. Our revenue recognition policy for IaaS offerings is in accordance with ASC 605 and ASC 840,Leases. Substantially all of our IaaS offerings are accounted for as operating leases as our contracts are structured so that the term of the arrangement is less than 75% of the economic life of the equipment and the present value of the minimum fixed payments are less than 90% of the fair market value of the equipment at the inception of the arrangement. Our evaluation of useful life is based on our historical product development cycles and our historical customer hardware upgrade cycles. Capacity on demand is a contingent payment and is therefore excluded from our assessment of the net present value of fixed payments. Revenue for capacity on demand is recognized in the period our customers access additional capacity provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS Offerings, Hardware Systems Products, and Hardware SystemsSupport and Related Services (Nonsoftware(Non-software Arrangements)
We enter into arrangements with customers that purchase both nonsoftwarenon-software related products and services from us at the same time, or within close proximity of one another (referred to as nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements). Each element within a nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangement is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting provided the following criteria are met: the delivered products or services have value to the customer on a standalone basis; and for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered products or services, delivery or performance of the undelivered product or service
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
is considered probable and is substantially controlled by us. We consider a deliverable to have standalone value if the product or service is sold separately by us or another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Further, our revenue
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to the delivered products. Where the aforementioned criteria for a separate unit of accounting are not met, the deliverable is combined with the undelivered element(s) and treated as a single unit of accounting for the purposes of allocation of the arrangement consideration and revenue recognition. For those units of accounting that include more than one deliverable but are treated as a single unit of accounting, we generally recognize revenues over the delivery period.contractual period of the arrangement, or in the case of our cloud offerings, we generally recognize revenues over the contractual term of the cloud software subscription. For the purposes of revenue classification of the elements that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we allocate revenue to the respective revenue line items within our consolidated statements of operations based on a rational and consistent methodology utilizing our best estimate of relative selling prices of such elements.
For our nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements, we allocate revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy at the arrangement’s inception. The selling price for each element is based upon the following selling price hierarchy: VSOE if available, third partythird-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE are available (a description as to how we determine VSOE, TPE and ESP is provided below). If a tangible hardware systems product includes software, we determine whether the tangible hardware systems product and the software work together to deliver the product’s essential functionality and, if so, the entire product is treated as a nonsoftwarenon-software deliverable. The total arrangement consideration is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the nonsoftwarenon-software deliverables using the relative selling prices of each unit based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. We limit the amount of revenue recognized for delivered elements to an amount that is not contingent upon future delivery of additional products or services or meeting of any specified performance conditions.
When possible, we establish VSOE of selling price for deliverables in software and nonsoftwarenon-software multiple-element arrangements using the price charged for a deliverable when sold separately and for software license updates and product support and hardware systems support, based on the renewal rates offered to customers. TPE is established by evaluating similar and interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone arrangements with similarly situated customers. If we are unable to determine the selling price because VSOE or TPE does not exist, we determine ESP for the purposes of allocating the arrangement by reviewing historical transactions, including transactions whereby the deliverable was sold on a standalone basis and considering several other external and internal factors including, but not limited to, pricing practices including discounting, margin objectives, competition, contractually stated prices, the geographies in which we offer our products and services, the type of customer (i.e., distributor, value addedvalue-added reseller, government agency and direct end user, among others) and the stage of the product lifecycle. The determination of ESP is made through consultation with and approval by our management, taking into consideration our pricing model and go-to-market strategy. As our, or our competitors’, pricing and go-to-market strategies evolve, we may modify our pricing practices in the future, which could result in changes to our determination of VSOE, TPE and ESP. As a result, our future revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements could differ materially from our results in the current period. Selling prices are analyzed on an annual basis or more frequently if we experience significant changes in our selling prices.
Revenue Recognition Policies Applicable to both Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
Revenue Recognition for Multiple-Element Arrangements—Arrangements with Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
We also enter into multiple-element arrangements that may include a combination of our various software related and nonsoftwarenon-software related products and services offerings including hardware systems products, hardware systems support, new software licenses, software license updates and product support, cloud software subscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings, hardware products, hardware support, consulting, managed cloudadvanced customer support services and education. In such arrangements, we first allocate the total arrangement consideration based on the relative selling prices of the software group of elements as a whole and
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
to the nonsoftwarenon-software elements. We then further allocate consideration within the software group to the respective elements within that group following the guidance in ASC 985-605 and our policies as described above. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to the elements, we account for each respective element in the arrangement as described above.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Other Revenue Recognition Policies Applicable to Software and NonsoftwareNon-software Elements
Many of our software arrangements include consulting implementation services sold separately under consulting engagement contracts and are included as a part of our services business. Consulting revenues from these arrangements are generally accounted for separately from new software licenses revenues because the arrangements qualify as services transactions as defined in ASC 985-605. The more significant factors considered in determining whether the revenues should be accounted for separately include the nature of services (i.e., consideration of whether the services are essential to the functionality of the licensed product), degree of risk, availability of services from other vendors, timing of payments and impact of milestones or acceptance criteria on the realizability of the software license fee. Revenues for consulting services are generally recognized as the services are performed. If there is a significant uncertainty about the project completion or receipt of payment for the consulting services, revenues are deferred until the uncertainty is sufficiently resolved. We estimate the proportional performance on contracts with fixed or “not to exceed” fees on a monthly basis utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure progress towards completion, revenues are recognized when we receive final acceptance from the customer that the services have been completed. When total cost estimates exceed revenues, we accrue for the estimated losses immediately using cost estimates that are based upon an average fully burdened daily rate applicable to the consulting organization delivering the services. The complexity of the estimation process and factors relating to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the proportional performance method of accounting affects the amounts of revenues and related expenses reported in our consolidated financial statements. A number of internal and external factors can affect our estimates, including labor rates, utilization and efficiency variances and specification and testing requirement changes.
Our managed cloudadvanced customer support services are offered as standalone arrangements or as a part of arrangements to customers buying newother software licenses or hardware systemsand non-software products and services. Oracle managed cloud services are designed to provide comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services for customers hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities. Additionally, we provideWe offer these advanced support services, both on-premise and remote, to Oracle customers to enable increased performance and higher availability of their products and services. Depending upon the nature of the arrangement, revenues from managed cloudthese services are recognized as the services are performed or ratably over the term of the service period, which is generally one year or less.
Education revenues are also a part of our services business and include instructor-led, media-based and internet-based training in the use of our software and hardware products. Education revenues are recognized as the classes or other education offerings are delivered.
If an arrangement contains multiple elements and does not qualify for separate accounting for the product and service transactions, then new software licenses revenues and/or hardware systems products revenues, including the costs of hardware systems products, are generally recognized together with the services based on contract accounting using either the percentage-of-completion or completed-contract method. Contract accounting is applied to any bundled software, hardware systems and services arrangements: (1) that include milestones or customer specific acceptance criteria that may affect collection of the software license or hardware systems product fees; (2) where consulting services include significant modification or customization of the software or hardware systems product or are of a specialized nature and generally performed only by Oracle; (3) where significant consulting services are provided for in the software license contract or hardware systems product contract without additional charge or are substantially discounted; or (4) where the software license or hardware systems product payment is tied to the performance of consulting services. For the purposes of revenue classification of the elements that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting, we allocate revenues to software and nonsoftwarenon-software elements based on a rational and consistent methodology utilizing our best estimate of the relative selling price of such elements.
We also evaluate arrangements with governmental entities containing “fiscal funding” or “termination for convenience” provisions, when such provisions are required by law, to determine the probability of possible cancellation. We consider multiple factors, including the history with the customer in similar transactions, the “essential use” of the software or hardware systems products and the planning, budgeting and approval processes
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
undertaken by the governmental entity. If we determine upon execution of these arrangements that the likelihood of cancellation is remote, we then recognize revenues once all of the criteria described above have been met. If such a determination cannot be made, revenues are recognized upon the earlier of cash receipt or approval of the applicable funding provision by the governmental entity.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
We assess whether fees are fixed or determinable at the time of sale and recognize revenues if all other revenue recognition requirements are met. Our standard payment terms are net 30 days. However, payment terms may vary based on the country in which the agreement is executed. Payments that are due within six months are generally deemed to be fixed or determinableWe evaluate non-standard payment terms based on ourwhether we have successful collection history on comparable arrangements (based upon similarity of customers, products, and license economics) and, if so, generally conclude such arrangements,payment terms are fixed and determinable and thereby satisfy the required criteria for revenue recognition.
While most of our arrangements for sales within our businesses include short-term payment terms, we have a standard practice of providing long-term financing to creditworthy customers primarily through our financing division. Since fiscal 1989, when our financing division was formed, we have established a history of collection, without concessions, on these receivables with payment terms that generally extend up to five years from the contract date. Provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize new software licenses revenues and hardware systems products revenues for these arrangements upon delivery, net of any payment discounts from financing transactions. We have generally sold receivables financed through our financing division on a non-recourse basis to third partythird-party financing institutions within 90 days of the contracts’ dates of execution and we classify the proceeds from these sales as cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. We account for the sales of these receivables as “true sales” as defined in ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing, as we are considered to have surrendered control of these financing receivables. During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, $2.2 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.5We sold $1.8 billion of our financing receivables were sold to financial institutions respectively.
In addition, we enter into arrangements with leasing companies for the saleduring each of our hardware systems products. These leasing companies, in turn, lease our products to end-users. The leasing companies generally have no recourse to us in the event of default by the end-userfiscal 2016 and we recognize revenue upon delivery, if all the other revenue recognition criteria have been met.2015, and $2.0 billion during fiscal 2014.
Our customers include several of our suppliers and, occasionally, we have purchased goods or services for our operations from these vendors at or about the same time that we have sold our products to these same companies (Concurrent Transactions). Software license agreements, sales of hardware or sales of hardware systemsservices that occur within a three-month time period from the date we have purchased goods or services from that same customer are reviewed for appropriate accounting treatment and disclosure. When we acquire goods or services from a customer, we negotiate the purchase separately from any sales transaction, at terms we consider to be at arm’s length and settle the purchase in cash. We recognize new software licenses revenues or hardware systems product revenues from Concurrent Transactions if all of our revenue recognition criteria are met and the goods and services acquired are necessary for our current operations.
Business Combinations
We apply the provisions of ASC 805,Business Combinations, in the accounting for our acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at theirthe acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as any contingent consideration, where applicable, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or our internal operations are accounted for as one-time termination and exit costs pursuant to ASC 420,Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, and are accounted for separately from the business combination. A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured at its fair value in our consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the liability is incurred. When estimating the fair value of facility restructuring activities, assumptions are applied regarding estimated sub-lease payments to be received, which can differ materially from actual results. This may require us to revise our initial estimates which may materially affect our results of operations and financial position in the period the revision is made.
For a given acquisition, we may identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition date and may extend our review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
to assess whether we include these contingencies as a part of the fair value estimates of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and, if so, to determine their estimated amounts.
If we cannot reasonably determine the fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) by the end of the measurement period, which is generally the case given the nature of such matters, we will recognize an asset or a liability for such pre-acquisition contingency if: (i)(1) it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii)(2) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. Subsequent to the measurement period, changes in our estimates of such contingencies will affect earnings and could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.
In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We reevaluate these items quarterly based upon facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date with any adjustments to our preliminary estimates being recorded to goodwill if identified within the measurement period. Subsequent to the measurement period or our final determination of the tax allowance’s or contingency’s estimated value, whichever comes first, changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances will affect our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations and could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
Marketable and Non-Marketable Securities
In accordance with ASC 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities,and based on our intentions regarding these instruments, we classify substantially all of our marketable debt and equity securities as available-for-sale. Marketable debt and equity securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, with all unrealized gains (losses) reflected net of tax in stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheets, and as a line item in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If we determine that an investment has an other than temporary decline in fair value, we recognize the investment loss in non-operating income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We periodically evaluate our investments to determine if impairment charges are required. Substantially all of our marketable debt and equity investments are classified as current based on the nature of the investments and their availability for use in current operations.
We hold investments in certain non-marketable equity securities in which we do not have a controlling interest or significant influence. These equity securities are recorded at cost and included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. If based on the terms of our ownership of these non-marketable securities, we determine that we exercise significant influence on the entity to which these non-marketable securities relate, we apply the requirements of ASC 323,Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures,to account for such investments. Our non-marketable securities are subject to periodic impairment reviews.
Fair ValueValues of Financial Instruments
We apply the provisions of ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and DisclosuresMeasurement(ASC 820), to our assets and liabilities that we are required to measure at fair value pursuant to other accounting standards, including our investments in marketable debt and equity securities and our derivative financial instruments.
The additional disclosures regarding our fair value measurements are included in Note 4.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We record allowances for doubtful accounts based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices not specifically reviewed, provisions are provided at differing rates, based upon the age of the receivable, the collection history associated with the geographic region that the receivable was recorded in and current economic trends. We write-off a receivable and charge it against its recorded allowance when we have exhausted our collection efforts without success.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that are potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivatives and trade receivables. Our cash and cash equivalents are generally held with large, diverse financial institutions worldwide to reduce the amount of exposure to any single financial institution. Investment policies have been implemented that limit purchases of marketable debt securities to investment gradeinvestment-grade securities. Our derivative contracts are transacted with various financial institutions with high credit standings. We generally do not require collateral to secure accounts receivable. The risk with respect to trade receivables is mitigated by credit evaluations we perform on our customers, the short duration of our payment terms for the significant majority of our customer contracts and by the diversification of our customer base. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.
We outsource the design, manufacturing, assembly and delivery of certain of our hardware products to a variety of companies, many of which are located outside the United States. Further, we have simplified our supply chain processes by reducing the number of third-party manufacturing partners and the number of locations where these third-party manufacturers build our hardware products. Any inability of these third-party manufacturing partners to fulfill orders for our hardware products could adversely impact future operating results of our hardware business.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. We evaluate our ending inventories for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analysis of sales levels by product and projections of future demand within specific time horizons (generally six months or less)to nine months). Inventories in excess of future demand are written down and charged to hardware systems products expenses. In addition, we assess the impact of changing technology to our inventories and we write down inventories that are considered obsolete. At the point of loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.
Other Receivables
Other receivables represent value-added tax and sales tax receivables associated with the sale of our products and services to third parties. Other receivables are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets and totaled $826$816 million and $812$817 million at May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively.
Deferred Sales Commissions
We defer sales commission expenses associated with our cloud software subscriptionsSaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings, and recognize the related expenses over the non-cancelable term of the related contracts, which are typically one to three years. Amortization of deferred sales commissions is included as a component of sales and marketing expenseexpenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment isare stated at the lower of cost or realizable value, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from one to fifty40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the lease terms, as appropriate. Property, plant and equipment isare periodically reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We did not recognize any significant property impairment charges in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.
Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Impairment Assessments
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Intangible assets that are not considered to have an indefinite useful life are amortized over their useful lives, which generally range from one to ten10 years. Each period we evaluate the estimated remaining useful lives of purchased intangible assets and whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization.
The carrying amounts of theseour goodwill and intangible assets are periodically reviewed for impairment (at least annually for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets) and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. Effective fiscal 2012,According to ASC 350,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, we optedcan opt to perform a qualitative assessment to test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment.impairment or we can directly perform the two-step impairment test. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
of more than 50 percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the two steptwo-step impairment test will be performed. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges in fiscal 2016 or 2014. During fiscal 2015, we recognized a $186 million goodwill impairment loss (refer to Note 7 below for additional information).
Recoverability of finite lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. Recoverability of indefinite lived intangible assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. If the asset is considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset. We did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.
Derivative Financial Instruments
During fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we used derivative and non-derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency and interest rate risks.risks (see Note 11 below for additional information). We account for these instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging(ASC 815), which requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value as of the reporting date. ASC 815 also requires that changes in our derivatives’ fair values be recognized in earnings, unless specific hedge accounting and documentation criteria are met (i.e., the instruments are accounted for as hedges).
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
The offset toaccounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. For a derivative instrument designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on derivative financial instruments that were designated as fair value hedges wereis recognized in earnings in the period of change. The loss or gain attributable to the risk being hedged is recognized in earnings with an offset recorded to the item for which the risk wasis being hedged. Any gains or losses on ourFor a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge, each reporting period we record the change in fair value on the effective portion of the derivative to accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets, and an amount is reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings to offset the earnings impact that is attributable to the risk being hedged. For the non-derivative financial instrument designated as a net investment hedge for our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries, the change on account of remeasurement of the effective portion for each reporting period is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets.
We perform the effectiveness testing of our aforementioned designated hedges on a quarterly basis and the changes in ineffective portions of the derivatives, if any, are recognized immediately in earnings.
Legal Contingencies
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. A description of our accounting policies associated with contingencies assumed as a part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above. For legal and other contingencies that are not a part of a business combination or related to income taxes, we accrue a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. A descriptionNote 18 below provides additional information regarding certain of our accounting policies associated with contingencies assumed as a part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above.legal contingencies.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Our shipping and handling costs for hardware systems products sales are included in hardware systems products expenses for all periods presented.
Foreign Currency
We transact business in various foreign currencies. In general, the functional currency of a foreign operation is the local country’s currency. Consequently, revenues and expenses of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. Dollars using weighted averageweighted-average exchange rates while assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. Dollars using exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) incomeloss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and related periodic movements are summarized as a line item in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Net foreign exchange transaction (losses) gainslosses included in non-operating income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $(162)$110 million, $(105)$157 million and $11$375 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for share-based payments to employees, including grants of service-based restricted stock awards, performance-based restricted stock awards (PSUs), service-based employee stock options, restricted stock-based awards and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, in accordance with ASC 718,Compensation-StockCompensation—Stock Compensation, which requires that share-based payments (to the extent they are compensatory) be recognized in our consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values and the estimated number of shares we ultimately expect will vest. WeFor our PSUs, we recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for each separately vesting tranche, which is generally twelve months, as the performance conditions to evaluate attainment of each tranche for each participant are independent of the performance conditions for the other tranches. The amount of stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, recorded as of the end of
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
each annual reporting period is based on the actual attainment of performance targets. During our interim reporting periods, stock-based compensation expense is recorded based on expected attainment of performance targets. Changes in our estimates of the expected attainment of performance targets are reflected in the amount of stock-based compensation expense that we recognize for each PSU tranche on a cumulative basis during each interim reporting period in which such estimates are altered and may cause the amount of stock-based compensation expense that we record for each interim reporting period to vary. For our service-based awards, we recognize stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, which is generally four years.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
We record deferred tax assets for stock-based compensation plan awards that result in deductions on our income tax returns based on the amount of stock-based compensation recognized and the fair value attributable to the vested portion of stock awards assumed in connection with a business combination, at the statutory tax rate in the jurisdiction in which we will receive a tax deduction.
Advertising
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses, which arewere included within sales and marketing expenses, were $85$68 million, $79$55 million and $88$79 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Research and Development and Software Development Costs
All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Software development costs required to be capitalized under ASC 985-20,Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed, and under ASC 350-40,Internal-Use Software, were not material to our consolidated financial statements in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014.
New Software Licenses and Cloud Software Subscriptions Revenues
New software licenses revenues represent fees earned from granting customers licenses to use our database and middleware and our application software products. Cloud software subscriptions revenues represent fees earned from granting customers access to select Oracle software applications and software platforms on a subscription basis through a cloud-based computing environment. Our new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
New software licenses | $ | 9,411 | $ | 9,451 | $ | 8,980 | ||||||
Cloud software subscriptions | 910 | 455 | 255 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues | $ | 10,321 | $ | 9,906 | $ | 9,235 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Acquisition Related and Other Expenses
Acquisition related and other expenses consist of personnel related costs for transitional and certain other employees, stock-based compensation expenses, integration related professional services, certain business combination adjustments including certain adjustments after the measurement period has ended and changes in fair value of contingent consideration payable (further discussed in Note 2 below) and certain other operating items, net. Stock-based compensation expenses included in acquisition related and other expenses resulted from unvested stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed from acquisitions whereby vesting was accelerated upon termination of the employees pursuant to the original terms of those stock options and restricted stock-based awards.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transitional and other employee related costs | $ | 27 | $ | 25 | $ | 129 | $ | 45 | $ | 57 | $ | 27 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 33 | 33 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Professional fees and other, net | (276 | ) | 13 | 66 | 10 | (35 | ) | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
Business combination adjustments, net | (388 | ) | (15 | ) | 3 | (16 | ) | 184 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total acquisition related and other expenses | $ | (604 | ) | $ | 56 | $ | 208 | $ | 42 | $ | 211 | $ | 41 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Included in acquisition related and other expenses for fiscal 2013 was a business combination benefit2016 and 2015 were an acquisition related to the change in estimate for contingent consideration payable, which resulted in a net benefit of $387$19 million in fiscal 2013 (see Note 2 for additional information), and a litigation related benefit related to certain litigation of $306$53 million, in fiscal 2013 (see Note 18 for additional information) that we recorded to professional fees and other, net, both of which reducedrespectively. Further, acquisition related and other expenses infor fiscal 2013.2015 included a loss of $186 million related to goodwill impairment (refer to Note 7 below for additional information).
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Non-Operating Income (Expense), net
Non-operating income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income, net foreign currency exchange gains (losses), the noncontrolling interests in the net profits of our majority-owned subsidiaries (Oracle(primarily Oracle Financial Services Software Limited and Oracle Japan) and net other income (losses), including net realized gains and losses related to all of our investments and net unrealized gains and losses related to the small portion of our investment portfolio that we classify as trading.
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 237 | $ | 231 | $ | 163 | $ | 538 | $ | 349 | $ | 263 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency (losses) gains, net | (162 | ) | (105 | ) | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency losses, net | (110 | ) | (157 | ) | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests in income | (112 | ) | (119 | ) | (97 | ) | (116 | ) | (113 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income, net | 48 | 15 | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other (loss) income, net | (7 | ) | 27 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total non-operating income, net | $ | 11 | $ | 22 | $ | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total non-operating income (expense), net | $ | 305 | $ | 106 | $ | (141 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Included in our non-operating income,foreign currency losses, net for fiscal 2013 was awere foreign currency remeasurement losslosses of $64$7 million, resulting from$23 million and $213 million in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to our Venezuelan subsidiary due to the recent devaluationcontinued “highly inflationary” designation of the Venezuelan currency by the Venezuelan government for our Venezuelan subsidiary that we had previously designated as “highly inflationary”economy in accordance with ASC 830,Foreign CurrencyMatters. As a large portion (ASC 830); certain currency exchange legislation in Venezuela that created certain foreign exchange mechanisms that based upon our specific facts and circumstances, were the most appropriate for the reporting of our consolidated operations are international, we could experience additional foreign currency volatilityVenezuelan subsidiary’s Bolivar-based transactions and net monetary assets in U.S. Dollars; and the future including additional foreign currency losses related toremeasurement of certain assets and liabilities of our Venezuelan subsidiary ifpursuant to such foreign exchange mechanisms with the Venezuelan government further devalues the Venezuelan currency, the amounts and timing of which are uncertain.corresponding loss recorded to earnings as required by ASC 830.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740,Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are recorded for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts recognized for income tax purposes. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount of future tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized.
A two-step approach is applied pursuant to ASC 740 in the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained in an audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in our provision for income taxes line of our consolidated statements of operations.
A description of our accounting policies associated with tax related contingencies and valuation allowances assumed as a part of a business combination is provided under “Business Combinations” above.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:Financial Instruments: In February 2013,June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02,ASU 2016-13,Comprehensive IncomeFinancial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 220)—Reporting326): Measurement of Amounts Reclassified OutCredit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13), which requires measurement and recognition of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2013-02), to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-022016-13 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2014 with2021, and earlier adoption is permitted which should be applied prospectively.beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2013-022016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment: In July 2012,January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02,ASU 2016-01,Intangibles—GoodwillFinancial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Other (Topic 350)—Testing Indefinite-Lived IntangibleMeasurement of Financial Assets for Impairmentand Financial Liabilities (ASU 2012-02)2016-01), to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test is not required. ASU 2012-022016-01 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2019, and earlier adoption is not permitted except for certain provisions. We currently do not expect that our pending adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Stock-based Compensation: In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes how companies account for certain aspects of stock-based awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2018, and earlier adoption is permitted. We believe we will early adopt ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption on our consolidated financial statements. We currently believe the most significant impact of our adoption of ASU 2016-09 to our consolidated financial statements will be to recognize certain tax benefits or tax shortfalls upon a restricted-stock award vesting or stock option exercise event relative to the deferred tax asset position established in our provision for income taxes line of our consolidated statement of operations instead of to consolidated equity. During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recorded $141 million, $267 million and $254 million to consolidated equity as tax benefits from our stock plans.
Leases: In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842)(ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires companies to generally recognize on the balance sheet operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets. ASU 2016-02 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2020 on a modified retrospective basis, and earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2012-022016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.statements, and we currently expect that most of our operating lease commitments will be subject to the new standard and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon our adoption of ASU 2016-02, which will increase our total assets and total liabilities that we report relative to such amounts prior to adoption.
Revenue Recognition: In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016 and May 2016 within ASU 2015-04, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12, respectively (ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-04, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 collectively, Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of Topic 606 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. Topic 606 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation, among others. Topic 606 is effective for us as of either our first quarter of fiscal 2018 or our first quarter of fiscal 2019 using either of two methods: (1) retrospective application of Topic 606 to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within Topic 606 or (2) retrospective application of Topic 606 with the cumulative effect of initially applying Topic 606 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined per Topic 606. Preliminarily, we plan to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 pursuant to the aforementioned adoption method (1) and we do not believe there will be a material impact to our revenues upon adoption. We are continuing to evaluate the impacts of our pending adoption of Topic 606 and our preliminary assessments are subject to change.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| 2. | ACQUISITIONS |
Fiscal 20132017 Acquisitions
Acquisition of Acme Packet, Inc.
On March 28, 2013,In June 2016, we completedacquired certain companies primarily to expand our acquisition of Acme Packet, Inc. (Acme Packet), a provider of session border control technology. We have includedcloud industry solutions offerings. These acquisitions were not individually significant. In the financial results of Acme Packet in our consolidated financial statements fromaggregate, the date of acquisition. Theestimated total preliminary purchase price for Acme Packet was approximately $2.1 billion, which consisted$1.3 billion. An initial allocation of approximately $2.1 billion in cash and $12 million for the fair value of stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed. We have preliminarily recorded $264 million of net tangible assets, $525 million of identifiable intangible assets, and $45 million of in-process research and development, based on their estimated fair values, and $1.3 billion of residual goodwill.
Acquisition of Eloqua, Inc.
On February 8, 2013, we completed our acquisition of Eloqua, Inc. (Eloqua), a provider of cloud-based marketing automation and revenue performance management software. We have included the financial results of Eloqua in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total preliminary purchase price for Eloqua was approximately $935 million, which consistedthese acquisitions will be performed in the first quarter of approximately $933 million in cash and $2 million for the fair value of stock options assumed. We have preliminarily recorded $1 million of net tangible assets and $327 million of identifiable intangible assets, based on their estimated fair values, and $607 million of residual goodwill.fiscal 2017.
Other Fiscal 20132016 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2013,2016, we acquired certain other companies and purchased certain technology and development assets primarily to expand our products and services offerings. These acquisitions were not significant individually or in the aggregate.
Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions
Acquisition of MICROS Systems, Inc.
On June 22, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) with MICROS Systems, Inc. (MICROS), a provider of integrated software, hardware and services solutions to the hospitality and retail industries. On July 3, 2014, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we commenced a tender offer to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of MICROS at a purchase price of $68.00 per share, net to the holder in cash, without interest thereon, based upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. Between September 3, 2014 and September 8, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, we accepted and paid for the substantial majority of outstanding shares of MICROS common stock. On September 8, 2014, we effectuated the merger of MICROS with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oracle pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and applicable Maryland law, and MICROS became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Oracle. Pursuant to the merger, shares of MICROS common stock that remained outstanding and were not acquired by us were converted into, and cancelled in exchange for, the right to receive $68.00 per share in cash. The unvested equity awards to acquire MICROS common stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the conclusion of the merger were converted into equity awards denominated in shares of Oracle common stock based on formulas contained in the Merger Agreement. We acquired MICROS to, among other things, expand our cloud and on-premise software, hardware and related services offerings for hotels, food and beverage industries, facilities, and retailers. We have included the financial results of these companiesMICROS in our consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates which were not individually materialthe date of acquisition.
Pursuant to our consolidated financial statements.
The preliminarybusiness combinations accounting policy, we estimated the fair value estimates for thevalues of net tangible and intangible assets acquired, and liabilities assumed for certain acquisitions completed during fiscal 2013 were based upon preliminary calculations and valuations and our estimates and assumptions for eachthe excess of these acquisitions are subject to changethe consideration transferred over the aggregate of such fair values was recorded as we obtain additional information for our estimates duringgoodwill. The following table summarizes the respective measurement periods (up to one yearestimated fair values of net assets acquired from the respective acquisition dates). The primary areas of those preliminary estimates that were not yet finalized related to certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, identifiable intangible assets, certain legal matters and income and non-income based taxes.MICROS:
In aggregate, the companies that we acquired during fiscal 2013 collectively contributed $99 million to our total revenues during fiscal 2013. Other collective revenue and earnings contributions were not significant or were not separately identifiable due to the integration of these acquired entities into our existing operations.
(in millions) Cash and cash equivalents Trade receivables, net Inventories Goodwill Intangible assets Other assets Accounts payable and other liabilities Deferred tax liabilities, net Deferred revenues Total In addition, as of May 31, 2013, we have agreed to acquire a company for amount that is not material to our business and expect to close the acquisition within the next twelve months. $ 683 181 28 3,242 2,030 155 (359 ) (536 ) (177 ) $ 5,247
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Fiscal 2012 AcquisitionsWe do not expect the goodwill recognized as a part of the MICROS acquisition to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Acquisition of Taleo CorporationOther Fiscal 2015 Acquisitions
On April 5, 2012,During fiscal 2015, we completedacquired certain other companies and purchased certain technology and development assets primarily to expand our acquisition of Taleo Corporation (Taleo), a provider of cloud-based talent management solutions.products and services offerings. These acquisitions were not individually significant. We have included the financial results of Taleothe acquired companies in our consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates, and the results from each of these companies were not individually material to our consolidated financial statements. In the aggregate, the total purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $1.7 billion, which consisted of approximately $1.7 billion in cash and $7 million for the fair values of restricted stock-based awards and stock options assumed. We recorded $6 million of net tangible liabilities and $388 million of identifiable intangible assets, based on their estimated fair values, and $1.4 billion of residual goodwill.
Fiscal 2014 Acquisitions
Acquisition of Responsys, Inc.
On February 6, 2014, we completed our acquisition of Responsys, Inc. (Responsys), a provider of enterprise-scale cloud-based business-to-consumer marketing software. We have included the financial results of Responsys in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total purchase price for TaleoResponsys was $2.0approximately $1.6 billion, which consisted of $2.0approximately $1.4 billion in cash and $10$147 million for the fair valuevalues of stock options and restricted stock-based awards and stock options assumed. We recorded $1.1 billion of identifiable intangible assets and $244$32 million of net tangible liabilities, related primarily to deferred tax liabilities, $580 million of identifiable intangible assets, and customer performance obligations that were assumed as a part$14 million of this acquisition,in-process research and development, based on their estimated fair values, and $1.1$1.0 billion of residual goodwill.
Acquisition of RightNow Technologies, Inc.
On January 25, 2012, we completed our acquisition of RightNow Technologies, Inc. (RightNow), a provider of cloud-based customer service. We have included the financial results of RightNow in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total purchase price for RightNow was $1.5 billion, which consisted of $1.5 billion in cash and $14 million for the fair value of stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed. We recorded $697 million of identifiable intangible assets and $259 million of net tangible liabilities related primarily to customer performance obligations, convertible debt and deferred tax liabilities that were assumed as a part of this acquisition, based on their estimated fair values, and $1.1 billion of residual goodwill.
Acquisition of Pillar Data Systems, Inc.
On July 18, 2011, we acquired Pillar Data Systems, Inc. (Pillar Data), a provider of enterprise storage systems solutions. Prior to the acquisition, Pillar Data was directly and indirectly majority-owned and controlled by Lawrence J. Ellison, our Chief Executive Officer, director and largest stockholder. Pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger dated as of June 29, 2011 (Pillar Data Merger Agreement), we acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Pillar Data from the stockholders in exchange for rights to receive contingent cash consideration (Earn-Out), if any, pursuant to an Earn-Out calculation. An affiliate of Mr. Ellison has a preference right to receive the first approximately $565 million of the Earn-Out, if any, and rights to 55% of any amount of the Earn-Out that exceeds $565 million.
The Earn-Out will be calculated with respect to a three-year period that commenced with our second quarter of fiscal 2012 and will conclude with our first quarter of fiscal 2015 (Earn-Out Period). The Earn-Out will be an amount (if positive) calculated based on the product of (i) the difference between (x) future revenues generated from the sale of certain Pillar Data products during Oracle’s last four full fiscal quarters during the Earn-Out Period minus (y) certain losses associated with certain Pillar Data products incurred over the entire Earn-Out Period, multiplied by (ii) three. Our obligation to pay the Earn-Out will be subject to reduction as a result of our right to set-off the amount of any indemnification claims we may have under the Pillar Data Merger Agreement. We do not expect the amount of the Earn-Out or its potential impact will be material to our results of operations or financial position.
We have included the financial results of Pillar Data in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. These results were not material to our consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of the liability for contingent consideration as of the acquisition date, representing the purchase price payable for our acquisition of Pillar Data, was approximately $346 million and was included in other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. Our liability for contingent consideration payable is subject to change until the liability is settled with the related impact recorded to our consolidated statements of operations as acquisition related and other expenses. In connection with our acquisition of Pillar Data, we recorded $142 million of identifiable intangible assets and $16 million of net tangible liabilities, based on their estimated fair values, and $220 million of residual goodwill. As of May 31, 2013, we estimated the fair value of the Earn-Out liability to be zero, which resulted in a net benefit to acquisition related and other expenses of $387 million in fiscal 2013. The Earn-Out liability decreased as of May 31, 2013 in comparison to the amount recorded as of the acquisition date primarily due to a change in our estimate of year three revenues related to our acquisition of Pillar Data and the related impact to the liability calculation in accordance with the Earn-Out formula as noted above. Our valuation techniques and inputs used to estimate the fair value of the Earn-Out liability are described in Note 4 below.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Other Fiscal 20122014 Acquisitions
During fiscal 2012,2014, we acquired certain other companies and purchased certain technology and development assets primarily to expand our products and services offerings. These acquisitions were not individually significant. We have included the financial results of these companies in our consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates, and the results from each of these companies were not individually material to our consolidated financial statements. In the aggregate, the total purchase price for these acquisitions was $1.6approximately $2.3 billion, which consisted primarily of cash consideration, and consistedwe recorded $230 million of $1.6net tangible liabilities, related primarily to deferred tax liabilities, $1.1 billion in cash and $5 million for the fair values of stock options assumed. We recorded $540 million of identifiable intangible assets, and $29$99 million of net tangible assets,in-process research and development, based on their estimated fair values, and $1.1$1.3 billion of residual goodwill.
In aggregate, the companies that we acquired during fiscal 2012 collectively contributed $231 million to our total software revenues during fiscal 2012. Other collective revenue and earnings contributions were not significant or were not separately identifiable due to the integration of these acquired entities into our existing operations.
Fiscal 2011 Acquisitions
On January 5, 2011, we completed our acquisition of Art Technology Group, Inc. (ATG), a provider of eCommerce software and related on demand commerce optimization applications. We have included the financial results of ATG in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total purchase price for ATG was $1.0 billion, which consisted of $990 million in cash and $16 million for the fair value of stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed. We have recorded $404 million of identifiable intangible assets and $111 million of net tangible assets, based on their estimated fair values, and $491 million of residual goodwill.
On August 11, 2010, we completed our acquisition of Phase Forward Incorporated (Phase Forward), a provider of applications for life sciences companies and healthcare providers. We have included the financial results of Phase Forward in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total purchase price for Phase Forward was $736 million, which consisted of $735 million in cash and $1 million for the fair value of restricted stock-based awards assumed. We recorded $370 million of identifiable intangible assets, $20 million of in-process research and development and $17 million of net tangible assets, based on their estimated fair values, and $329 million of residual goodwill.
During fiscal 2011, we acquired certain other companies and purchased certain technology and development assets to expand our products and services offerings. These acquisitions were not significant individually or in the aggregate. We have included the financial results of these companies in our consolidated results from their respective acquisition dates, which were not individually significant.
In aggregate, the companies that we acquired during fiscal 2011 collectively contributed $231 million to our total software revenues in fiscal 2011. Other collective revenue and earnings contributions were not significant or were not separately identifiable due to the integration of these acquired entities into our existing operations.
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations for Oracle, Acme Packet, Eloqua, Taleo, RightNow, Pillar DataMICROS, and certain other companies that we acquired since the beginning of fiscal 2012 (which2015 that were considered significantrelevant for the purposes of unaudited pro forma financial information disclosure)disclosure as thoughif the companies were combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2012.2015. The unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods presented also included the business combination accounting effects resulting from these acquisitions, including our amortization charges from acquired intangible assets (certain of which wereare preliminary), stock-based compensation charges for restricted stock-based awards and unvested stock options and restricted stock-based awards assumed, if any, and the related tax effects as though the aforementioned companies were combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2012.2015. The unaudited pro forma financial information as presented below is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisitions had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2012.2015.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
The unaudited pro forma financial information for fiscal 20132016 combined the historical results of Oracle for fiscal 2013, the historical results of Acme Packet for the year ended December 31, 2012 (adjusted due to differences in reporting periods2016 and considering the date we acquired Acme Packet), the historical results of Eloqua for nine months ended September 30, 2012 (adjusted due to differences in reporting periods and considering the date we acquired Eloqua), the historical results of certain other companies that we acquired since the beginning of fiscal 20132016 based upon their respective previous reporting periods and the dates these companies were acquired by us, and the effects of the pro forma adjustments listed above.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for fiscal 20122015 combined the historical results of Oracle for fiscal 2012,2015, the historical results of Acme PacketMICROS for the twelvesix months ended June 30, 2012 (due to differences in reporting periods), the historical results of Eloqua for the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 (due to differences in reporting periods), the historical results of Taleo for twelve months ended December 31, 20112014 (adjusted due to differences in reporting periods and considering the date we acquired Taleo)MICROS), the historical results of RightNow for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (adjusted due to differences in reporting periods and considering the date we acquired RightNow), the historical results of Pillar Data for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (adjusted due to differences in reporting periods and considering the date we acquired Pillar Data), the historical results of certain other companies that we acquired since the beginning of fiscal 20122015 based upon their respective previous reporting periods and the dates these companies were acquired by us, and the effects of the pro forma adjustments listed above. The unaudited pro forma financial information was as follows for fiscal 2013 and 2012:follows:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 37,477 | $ | 38,032 | $ | 37,084 | $ | 38,771 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,838 | $ | 9,630 | $ | 8,869 | $ | 9,844 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 2.27 | $ | 1.92 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 2.24 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 2.06 | $ | 2.19 | ||||||||
| 3. | CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES |
Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of deposits held at major banks, Tier-1 commercial paper and other securities with original maturities of 90 days or less. Marketable securities primarily consist of time deposits held at major banks, Tier-1 commercial paper debt securities, corporate debt securities and corporate notes.certain other securities.
The amortized principal amounts of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities approximated their fair values at May 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015. We use the specific identification method to determine any realized gains or losses from the sale of our marketable securities classified as available-for-sale. Such realized gains and losses were insignificant for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014. The following table summarizes the components of our cash equivalents and marketable securities held, substantially all of which were classified as available-for-sale:
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 3,750 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities | 214 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial paper debt securities | $ | 14,043 | $ | 13,954 | 2,155 | 9,203 | ||||||||||
Corporate debt securities and other | 4,935 | 2,337 | 35,274 | 28,844 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 18,978 | $ | 16,291 | $ | 41,393 | $ | 38,715 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Investments classified as cash equivalents | $ | 1,375 | $ | 570 | $ | 5,420 | $ | 6,063 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Investments classified as marketable securities | $ | 17,603 | $ | 15,721 | $ | 35,973 | $ | 32,652 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
As of each of May 31, 2013,2016 and 2015, approximately 91%28% of our marketable securities investments mature within one year. As of May 31, 2012, substantially all of our marketable securities investments maturedyear and 72% mature within one year.to six years. Our investment portfolio is subject to market risk due to changes in interest rates. As described above, we limit purchases of marketable debt securities to investment gradeinvestment-grade securities, which have high credit ratings and also limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. As stated in our investment policy, we are averse to principal loss and seek to preserve our invested funds by limiting default risk and market risk.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
| 4. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
We perform fair value measurements in accordance with the guidance provided by ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at their fair values, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance.
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. An asset’s or a liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or
Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, consisted of the following (Level 1 2 and 3Level 2 inputs are defined above):
| May 31, 2013 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types | Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types | Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types | Fair Value Measurements Using Input Types | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 3,750 | $ | — | $ | 3,750 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities | 214 | — | 214 | 668 | — | 668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper debt securities | $ | — | $ | 14,043 | $ | — | $ | 14,043 | $ | — | $ | 13,954 | $ | — | $ | 13,954 | — | 2,155 | 2,155 | — | 9,203 | 9,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities and other | 246 | 4,689 | — | 4,935 | 354 | 1,983 | — | 2,337 | 179 | 35,095 | 35,274 | 190 | 28,654 | 28,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | 41 | — | 41 | — | 69 | — | 69 | — | 122 | 122 | — | 74 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 246 | $ | 18,773 | $ | — | $ | 19,019 | $ | 354 | $ | 16,006 | $ | — | $ | 16,360 | $ | 4,143 | $ | 37,372 | $ | 41,515 | $ | 858 | $ | 37,931 | $ | 38,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 387 | $ | 387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | $ | 218 | $ | 218 | $ | — | $ | 244 | $ | 244 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our marketable securities that were classified as Level 1 in the table above were derived from quoted market prices and active markets for these instruments exist. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of Level 2 instruments listed in the table above, the counterparties to which have high credit ratings, were derived from the following: non-binding market consensus prices that arewere corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data including LIBOR-based yield curves, among others. The
Based on the trading prices of our $40.1 billion and $42.0 billion of borrowings, which consisted of senior notes and the related fair value of contingent consideration payable that was classified as Level 3 in the table above was estimated using a discounted cash flow technique with significant inputshedges that were not observable inoutstanding as of May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the market and thus represented a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined in ASC 820. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity included our probability assessments of expected future year three revenues related to our acquisition of Pillar Data and their related impact to the liability calculation, appropriately discounted considering the uncertainties associated with the obligation, and as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Pillar Data Merger Agreement.estimated
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Based on the trading prices of our $18.5 billion and $16.5 billion of borrowings, which consisted of senior notes that were outstanding as of May 31, 2013 and senior notes and short-term borrowings that were outstanding as of May 31, 2012, respectively, the estimated fair values of our borrowingssenior notes the related fair value hedges using Level 2 inputs at May 31, 20132016 and 20122015 were $20.7$43.2 billion and $19.3$44.1 billion, respectively. As of May 31, 2016, the estimated fair value of our $3.8 billion of short-term borrowings approximates carrying value due to the short maturity of the borrowings.
| 5. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories consisted of the following:
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 114 | $ | 45 | $ | 95 | $ | 112 | ||||||||
Work-in-process | 31 | 20 | 31 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Finished goods | 95 | 93 | 86 | 164 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 240 | $ | 158 | $ | 212 | $ | 314 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| 6. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following:
| Estimated Useful Life | May 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
Computer, network, machinery and equipment | 1-5 years | $ | 2,138 | $ | 1,761 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements | 1-50 years | 2,477 | 2,351 | |||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and other | 3-10 years | 481 | 492 | |||||||||
Land | — | 632 | 702 | |||||||||
Construction in progress | — | 28 | 113 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment | 1-50 years | 5,756 | 5,419 | |||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (2,703 | ) | (2,398 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 3,053 | $ | 3,021 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
| Estimated Useful Life | May 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Computer, network, machinery and equipment | 1-5 years | $ | 3,927 | $ | 3,345 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements | 1-40 years | 2,754 | 2,721 | |||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and other | 5-15 years | 574 | 547 | |||||||||
Land | — | 744 | 589 | |||||||||
Construction in progress | — | 97 | 93 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment | 1-40 years | 8,096 | 7,295 | |||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (4,096 | ) | (3,609 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 4,000 | $ | 3,686 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 7. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL |
The changes in intangible assets for fiscal 20132016 and the net book value of intangible assets atas of May 31, 20132016 and 20122015 were as follows:
| Intangible Assets, Gross | Accumulated Amortization | Intangible Assets, Net | Weighted Average Useful Life(1) | Intangible Assets, Gross | Accumulated Amortization | Intangible Assets, Net | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | May 31, 2012 | Additions | May 31, 2013 | May 31, 2012 | Expense | May 31, 2013 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2013 | May 31, 2015 | Additions | Retirements | May 31, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | Expense | Retirements | May 31, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | May 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software support agreements and related relationships | $ | 5,294 | $ | 4 | $ | 5,298 | $ | (3,330 | ) | $ | (582 | ) | $ | (3,912 | ) | $ | 1,964 | $ | 1,386 | 5 years | $ | 4,190 | $ | — | $ | (1,771 | ) | $ | 2,419 | $ | (2,700 | ) | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 1,771 | $ | (1,287 | ) | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,132 | N.A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems support agreements and related relationships | 768 | 49 | 817 | (266 | ) | (121 | ) | (387 | ) | 502 | 430 | 7 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support agreements and related relationships | 1,012 | — | (2 | ) | 1,010 | (654 | ) | (145 | ) | 2 | (797 | ) | 358 | 213 | N.A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | 6,908 | 558 | 7,466 | (4,651 | ) | (826 | ) | (5,477 | ) | 2,257 | 1,989 | 7 years | 4,602 | 97 | (1,038 | ) | 3,661 | (2,355 | ) | (559 | ) | 1,038 | (1,876 | ) | 2,247 | 1,785 | 5 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core technology | 2,549 | 30 | 2,579 | (1,609 | ) | (329 | ) | (1,938 | ) | 940 | 641 | 3 years | 552 | — | — | 552 | (411 | ) | (89 | ) | — | (500 | ) | 141 | 52 | N.A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships and contract backlog | 2,260 | 175 | 2,435 | (1,287 | ) | (350 | ) | (1,637 | ) | 973 | 798 | 6 years | 2,197 | 8 | (806 | ) | 1,399 | (1,710 | ) | (217 | ) | 806 | (1,121 | ) | 487 | 278 | 3 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software subscriptions and related relationships | 989 | 238 | 1,227 | (42 | ) | (113 | ) | (155 | ) | 947 | 1,072 | 8 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SaaS, PaaS and IaaS agreements and related relationships and other | 1,993 | 57 | (16 | ) | 2,034 | (508 | ) | (212 | ) | 16 | (704 | ) | 1,485 | 1,330 | 10 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks | 597 | 38 | 635 | (292 | ) | (64 | ) | (356 | ) | 305 | 279 | 8 years | 501 | 13 | (23 | ) | 491 | (303 | ) | (58 | ) | 23 | (338 | ) | 198 | 153 | 5 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets subject to amortization | 19,365 | 1,092 | 20,457 | (11,477 | ) | (2,385 | ) | (13,862 | ) | 7,888 | 6,595 | 7 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-process research and development | 11 | 34 | 45 | — | — | — | 11 | 45 | N.A. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 19,376 | $ | 1,126 | $ | 20,502 | $ | (11,477 | ) | $ | (2,385 | ) | $ | (13,862 | ) | $ | 7,899 | $ | 6,640 | $ | 15,047 | $ | 175 | $ | (3,656 | ) | $ | 11,566 | $ | (8,641) | $ | (1,638) | $ | 3,656 | $ | (6,623) | $ | 6,406 | $ | 4,943 | 7 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Represents weighted-average useful lives of intangible assets acquired during fiscal 2016
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Total amortization expense related to our intangible assets was $2.4$1.6 billion, $2.1 billion and $2.3 billion in each of fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014, respectively. As of May 31, 2013,2016, estimated future amortization expenses related to intangible assets were as follows (in millions):
Fiscal 2014 | $ | 2,123 | ||
Fiscal 2015 | 1,656 | |||
Fiscal 2016 | 1,094 | |||
Fiscal 2017 | 523 | |||
Fiscal 2018 | 397 | |||
Thereafter | 802 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets subject to amortization | 6,595 | |||
In-process research and development | 45 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 6,640 | ||
|
|
Fiscal 2017 | $ | 1,026 | ||
Fiscal 2018 | 878 | |||
Fiscal 2019 | 770 | |||
Fiscal 2020 | 621 | |||
Fiscal 2021 | 476 | |||
Thereafter | 1,172 | |||
|
| |||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 4,943 | ||
|
|
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill, net, which is generally not deductible for tax purposes, for our operating segments for fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
(in millions) | Cloud Software and On-Premise Software | Software License Updates and Product Support | Hardware Support | Consulting | Other, net(3) | Total Goodwill, net | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2014 | $ | 13,139 | $ | 12,472 | $ | 2,082 | $ | 1,733 | $ | 226 | $ | 29,652 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | 2,086 | 1,991 | 269 | 27 | 240 | 4,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments, net(1) | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | 19 | (1 | ) | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment(2) | — | — | — | — | (186 | ) | (186 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2015 | 15,217 | 14,461 | 2,370 | 1,759 | 280 | 34,087 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | 518 | — | — | — | — | 518 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments, net(1) | 12 | (22 | ) | (3 | ) | — | (2 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2016 | $ | 15,747 | $ | 14,439 | $ | 2,367 | $ | 1,759 | $ | 278 | $ | 34,590 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| (1) | Pursuant to our business combinations accounting policy, we recorded goodwill adjustments for the effects on goodwill of changes to net assets acquired during the period that such a change is identified, provided that any such change is within the measurement period (up to one year from the date of the acquisition). |
| (2) | During fiscal 2015, we recorded a $186 million goodwill impairment loss to our hardware products reporting unit. We considered several approaches to determine the fair value of our hardware products reporting unit as of March 1, 2015 and concluded the most appropriate to be the income approach. The fair value of our hardware products reporting unit pursuant to the income approach was impacted by lower forecasted operating results for this reporting unit, primarily caused by lower forecasted revenues and our continued investment in hardware products research and development activities. We compared the implied fair value of goodwill in our hardware products reporting unit to its carrying value, which resulted in the $186 million goodwill impairment loss and represented the aggregate amount of goodwill for our hardware products reporting unit. The aggregate hardware products reporting unit goodwill that was impaired in fiscal 2015 resulted from our acquisitions of Pillar Data Systems, Inc., Xsigo Systems, Inc., GreenBytes, Inc. and MICROS Systems, Inc. Such impairment loss was recorded to acquisition related and other expenses in our fiscal 2015 consolidated statement of operations. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 2016 or fiscal 2014. |
| (3) | Represents goodwill allocated to our other operating segments. |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill, which is generally not deductible for tax purposes, for our operating segments for fiscal 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | New Software Licenses and Cloud Software Subscriptions | Software License Updates and Product Support | Hardware Systems Support | Other(3) | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2011 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 12,052 | $ | 1,009 | $ | 1,707 | $ | 21,553 | ||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | 658 | 461 | 184 | 2,378 | 3,681 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments(1) | (76 | ) | (34 | ) | — | (5 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2012 | 7,367 | 12,479 | 1,193 | 4,080 | 25,119 | |||||||||||||||
Allocation of goodwill(2) | 2,346 | — | — | (2,346 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | 933 | 27 | 62 | 1,341 | 2,363 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments(1) | (113 | ) | (32 | ) | 4 | 2 | (139 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balances as of May 31, 2013 | $ | 10,533 | $ | 12,474 | $ | 1,259 | $ | 3,077 | $ | 27,343 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
| 8. | NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER BORROWINGS |
Notes payable and other borrowings consisted of the following:
| May 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | — | $ | 1,700 | ||||
4.95% senior notes due April 2013 | — | 1,250 | ||||||
3.75% senior notes due July 2014, net of fair value adjustments of $41 and $69 as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively(1) | 1,541 | 1,569 | ||||||
5.25% senior notes due January 2016, net of discount of $3 and $4 as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 1,997 | 1,996 | ||||||
1.20% senior notes due October 2017, net of discount of $3 as of May 31, 2013 | 2,497 | — | ||||||
5.75% senior notes due April 2018, net of discount of $1 each as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 | 2,499 | 2,499 | ||||||
5.00% senior notes due July 2019, net of discount of $4 and $5 as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 1,746 | 1,745 | ||||||
3.875% senior notes due July 2020, net of discount of $2 each as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 | 998 | 998 | ||||||
2.50% senior notes due October 2022, net of discount of $2 as of May 31, 2013 | 2,498 | — | ||||||
6.50% senior notes due April 2038, net of discount of $2 each as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 | 1,248 | 1,248 | ||||||
6.125% senior notes due July 2039, net of discount of $7 and $8 as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 1,243 | 1,242 | ||||||
5.375% senior notes due July 2040, net of discount of $24 each as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 2,226 | 2,226 | ||||||
Capital leases | 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total borrowings | $ | 18,494 | $ | 16,474 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Notes payable, current and other current borrowings | $ | — | $ | 2,950 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Notes payable, non-current and other non-current borrowings | $ | 18,494 | $ | 13,524 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| May 31, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Date of Issuance | Amount | Effective Interest Rate | Amount | Effective Interest Rate | |||||||||||||
Revolving credit agreements: | ||||||||||||||||||
$3,750, LIBOR plus 0.35%, due June 2016 | May 2016 | $ | 3,750 | 0.81 | % | $ | — | N.A. | ||||||||||
Floating-rate senior notes: | ||||||||||||||||||
$1,000, three-month LIBOR plus 0.20%, due July 2017 | July 2014 | 1,000 | 0.83 | % | 1,000 | 0.47 | % | |||||||||||
$500, three-month LIBOR plus 0.58%, due January 2019 | July 2013 | 500 | 1.21 | % | 500 | 0.86 | % | |||||||||||
$750, three-month LIBOR plus 0.51%, due October 2019 | July 2014 | 750 | 1.14 | % | 750 | 0.78 | % | |||||||||||
Fixed-rate senior notes: | ||||||||||||||||||
$2,000, 5.25%, due January 2016 | January 2006 | — | N.A. | 2,000 | 5.32 | % | ||||||||||||
$2,500, 1.20%, due October 2017 | October 2012 | 2,500 | 1.24 | % | 2,500 | 1.24 | % | |||||||||||
$2,500, 5.75%, due April 2018 | April 2008 | 2,500 | 5.76 | % | 2,500 | 5.76 | % | |||||||||||
$1,500, 2.375%, due January 2019(1) | July 2013 | 1,500 | 2.44 | % | 1,500 | 2.44 | % | |||||||||||
$1,750, 5.00%, due July 2019 | July 2009 | 1,750 | 5.05 | % | 1,750 | 5.05 | % | |||||||||||
$2,000, 2.25%, due October 2019(1) | July 2014 | 2,000 | 2.27 | % | 2,000 | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||
$1,000, 3.875%, due July 2020 | July 2010 | 1,000 | 3.93 | % | 1,000 | 3.93 | % | |||||||||||
€1,250, 2.25%, due January 2021(2)(3) | July 2013 | 1,394 | 2.33 | % | 1,352 | 2.33 | % | |||||||||||
$1,500, 2.80%, due July 2021(1) | July 2014 | 1,500 | 2.82 | % | 1,500 | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||
$2,500, 2.50%, due May 2022 | May 2015 | 2,500 | 2.56 | % | 2,500 | 2.56 | % | |||||||||||
$2,500, 2.50%, due October 2022 | October 2012 | 2,500 | 2.51 | % | 2,500 | 2.51 | % | |||||||||||
$1,000, 3.625%, due July 2023 | July 2013 | 1,000 | 3.73 | % | 1,000 | 3.73 | % | |||||||||||
$2,000, 3.40%, due July 2024 | July 2014 | 2,000 | 3.43 | % | 2,000 | 3.43 | % | |||||||||||
$2,500, 2.95%, due May 2025 | May 2015 | 2,500 | 3.00 | % | 2,500 | 3.00 | % | |||||||||||
€750, 3.125%, due July 2025(2)(4) | July 2013 | 836 | 3.17 | % | 810 | 3.17 | % | |||||||||||
$500, 3.25%, due May 2030 | May 2015 | 500 | 3.30 | % | 500 | 3.30 | % | |||||||||||
$1,750, 4.30%, due July 2034 | July 2014 | 1,750 | 4.30 | % | 1,750 | 4.30 | % | |||||||||||
$1,250, 3.90%, due May 2035 | May 2015 | 1,250 | 3.95 | % | 1,250 | 3.95 | % | |||||||||||
$1,250, 6.50%, due April 2038 | April 2008 | 1,250 | 6.52 | % | 1,250 | 6.52 | % | |||||||||||
$1,250, 6.125%, due July 2039 | July 2009 | 1,250 | 6.19 | % | 1,250 | 6.19 | % | |||||||||||
$2,250, 5.375%, due July 2040 | July 2010 | 2,250 | 5.45 | % | 2,250 | 5.45 | % | |||||||||||
$1,000, 4.50%, due July 2044 | July 2014 | 1,000 | 4.50 | % | 1,000 | 4.50 | % | |||||||||||
$2,000, 4.125%, due May 2045 | May 2015 | 2,000 | 4.15 | % | 2,000 | 4.15 | % | |||||||||||
$1,250, 4.375%, due May 2055 | May 2015 | 1,250 | 4.40 | % | 1,250 | 4.40 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total senior notes and other borrowings | $ | 43,980 | $ | 42,162 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized discount/issuance costs | (247 | ) | (278 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Hedge accounting fair value adjustments(1) | 122 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total notes payable and other borrowings | $ | 43,855 | $ | 41,958 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Notes payable and other borrowings, current | $ | 3,750 | $ | 1,999 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Notes payable, non-current | $ | 40,105 | $ | 39,959 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
| (1) | We have entered into certain interest rate swap agreements that have the economic effects of modifying the fixed-interest obligations associated with the 2.375% senior notes due January 2019 (January 2019 Notes), the 2.25% senior notes due October 2019 (October 2019 Notes) and the 2.80% senior notes due July 2021 (July 2021 Notes) so that the interest payable on these notes effectively became variable based on LIBOR. The effective interest rates after consideration of these fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements were 1.28% and 0.93% for the January 2019 Notes, 1.11% and 0.76% for the October 2019 Notes, and 1.26% and 0.91% for the July 2021 Notes as of May 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Refer to |
| (2) | In July 2013, we issued €2.0 billion of fixed-rate senior notes comprised of €1.25 billion of 2.25% senior notes due January 2021 (January 2021 Notes) and €750 million of 3.125% senior notes due July 2025 (July 2025 Notes, and together with the January 2021 Notes, the Euro Notes). Principal and unamortized discount/issuance costs for the Euro Notes in the table above were calculated using foreign currency exchange rates as of May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015, respectively. The Euro Notes are registered and trade on the New York Stock Exchange. |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
| (3) | In connection with the issuance of the January 2021 Notes, we entered into certain cross-currency swap agreements that have the economic effect of converting our fixed-rate, Euro-denominated debt, including annual interest payments and the payment of principal at maturity, to a fixed-rate, U.S. Dollar-denominated debt of $1.6 billion with a fixed annual interest rate of 3.53% (see Note 11 for additional information). |
| (4) | We designated the July 2025 Notes as a net investment hedge of our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency in order to reduce the volatility in stockholders’ equity caused by the changes in foreign currency exchange rates of the Euro with respect to the U.S. Dollar (see Note 11 for additional information). |
Senior Notes and Other Borrowings
In October 2012, we issued $5.0 billion of fixed rate senior notes comprised of $2.5 billion of 1.20% notes due October 2017 (2017 Notes) and $2.5 billion of 2.50% notes due October 2022 (2022 Notes). We issued these senior notes for general corporate purposes, which may include stock repurchases, future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness, including the repayment of $1.25 billion of 4.95% senior notes that matured and were repaid in April 2013.
In July 2010, we issued $3.25 billion of fixed rate senior notes comprised of $1.0 billion of 3.875% notes due July 2020 (2020 Notes) and $2.25 billion of 5.375% notes due July 2040 (2040 Notes, and together with the 2020 Notes, the Original Senior Notes). As part of the offering of the Original Senior Notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers for the benefit of the holders of the Original Senior Notes in which we agreed to file with the SEC a registration statement with respect to senior notes identical in all material respects to the Original Senior Notes within fourteen months after the issue date of the Original Senior Notes and on December 16, 2011 we completed a registered offer to exchange the Original Senior Notes for new freely tradable notes having terms substantially identical to the Original Senior Notes. An aggregate of $994 million principal amount of the 2020 Notes and an aggregate of $2.24 billion principal amount of the 2040 Notes were tendered and exchanged in the offer.
In July 2009, we issued $4.5 billion of fixed rate senior notes comprised of $1.5 billion of 3.75% notes due July 2014 (2014 Notes), $1.75 billion of 5.00% notes due July 2019 (2019 Notes) and $1.25 billion of 6.125% notes due July 2039 (2039 Notes).
In April 2008, we issued $5.0 billion of fixed rate senior notes, of which $1.25 billion of 4.95% senior notes was due and paid in April 2013, and $2.5 billion of 5.75% senior notes due April 2018 (2018 Notes) and $1.25 billion of 6.50% senior notes due April 2038 (2038 Notes) remained outstanding as of May 31, 2013.
In January 2006, we issued $5.75 billion of senior notes, of which $2.25 billion of 5.00% senior notes was due and paid in January 2011 and2016, our $2.0 billion of 5.25% senior notes due January 2016 (2016matured and were repaid. In July 2014, our $1.5 billion of 3.75% senior notes due July 2014 (July 2014 Notes) remained outstanding as of May 31, 2013.matured and were repaid (we also settled the fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements associated with the July 2014 Notes).
The effective interest yields of the 2014 Notes, 2016 Notes, 2017 Notes, 2018 Notes, 2019 Notes, 2020 Notes, 2022 Notes, 2038 Notes, 2039 Notes and 2040 Notes (collectively, the Senior Notes) at May 31, 2013 were 3.75%, 5.32%, 1.24%, 5.76%, 5.05%, 3.93%, 2.51%, 6.52%, 6.19% and 5.45%, respectively. Interest is payable semi-annually for the Senior Notes. In September 2009, we entered intosenior notes except for the Euro Notes for which interest rate swap agreements that haveis payable annually and the economic effect of modifying the fixedfloating-rate senior notes for which interest obligations associated with the 2014 Notes so that the interestis payable on these notes effectively became variable (1.34% at May 31, 2013; see Note 11 for additional information).quarterly. We may redeem some or all of the Senior Notessenior notes of each series at any time,prior to their maturity, subject to certain restrictions, and the payment of an applicable make-whole premium.premium in certain instances except for the floating-rate senior notes which may not be redeemed prior to their maturity.
The Senior Notessenior notes rank pari passu with any other notes we may issue in the future pursuant to our commercial paper program (see additional discussion regarding our commercial paper program below) and all existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness of Oracle Corporation. All existing and future liabilities of the subsidiaries of Oracle Corporation are or will be effectively senior to the Senior Notessenior notes and any future issuances of our commercial paper notes. We were in compliance with all debt-related covenants as ofat May 31, 2013.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, shortly after the closing of our acquisition of RightNow, we repaid, in full, $255 million of RightNow’s legacy convertible notes.2016.
Future principal payments (adjusted for the effects of the cross-currency swap agreements associated with the January 2021 Notes) for all of our borrowings at May 31, 20132016 were as follows (in millions):
Fiscal 2014 | $ | — | ||||||
Fiscal 2015 | 1,500 | |||||||
Fiscal 2016 | 2,000 | |||||||
Fiscal 2017 | — | $ | 3,750 | |||||
Fiscal 2018 | 5,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Fiscal 2019 | 2,000 | |||||||
Fiscal 2020 | 4,500 | |||||||
Fiscal 2021 | 2,655 | |||||||
Thereafter | 10,000 | 25,336 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 18,500 | $ | 44,241 | ||||
|
| |||||||
ORACLE CORPORATIONRevolving Credit Agreements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In May 31, 2013
Commercial Paper Program and Commercial Paper Notes
On April 22, 2013, pursuant to our existing $3.0 billion commercial paper program which allows us to issue and sell unsecured short-term promissory notes pursuant to a private placement exemption from the registration requirements under federal and state securities laws,2016, we entered into new dealerthree revolving credit agreements with various banks and a new Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement with JP MorganJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. As of May 31, 2013, as initial lender and 2012, we did not have any outstanding commercial paper notes. We intendadministrative agent (the 2016 Credit Agreements) and borrowed $3.8 billion pursuant to back-stop any commercial paper notes that we may issuethese agreements. The 2016 Credit Agreements provided us with short-term borrowings for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Interest for the 2016 Credit Agreements is based on either (1) a LIBOR-based formula or (2) the Base Rate formula, each as set forth in the future with2016 Credit Agreements. The borrowings are due and payable on June 27, 2016, which is the 2013termination date of the 2016 Credit Agreement (see additional details below).
Revolving Credit AgreementsAgreements.
In April 2013, we entered into a $3.0 billion Revolving Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., BNP Paribas, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and certain other lenders (the 2013 Credit Agreement). The 2013 Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured 5-year revolving credit facility to be used for general corporate purposes including back-stopping any commercial paper notes that we may issue. Subject to certain conditions stated in the 2013 Credit Agreement, we may borrow, prepay and re-borrow amounts under the 2013 Credit Agreement at any time during the term of the 2013 Credit Agreement. Interest under the 2013 Credit Agreement is based on either (a) a LIBOR-based formula or (b) the Base Rate formula, each as set forth in the
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
2013 Credit Agreement. Any amounts drawn pursuant to the 2013 Credit Agreement are due on April 20, 2018. No amounts were outstanding pursuant to the 2013 Credit Agreement as of May 31, 2013.2016 and 2015.
The 2016 Credit Agreements and the 2013 Credit Agreement containscontain certain customary representations and warranties, covenants and events of default, including the requirement that our total net debt to total capitalization ratio not exceed 45% on a consolidated basis.default. If any of the events of default occur and are not cured within applicable grace periods or waived, any unpaid amounts owed under the 2013 Credit Agreementagreement to which the default relates may be declared immediately due and payable and the 2013 Credit Agreementrelevant agreement may be terminated. We were in compliance with the covenants of the 2016 Credit Agreements and the 2013 Credit Agreement’s covenantsAgreement as of May 31, 2013.2016.
On May 29, 2012, we borrowed $1.7Commercial Paper Program and Commercial Paper Notes
In April 2013, pursuant to our existing $3.0 billion commercial paper program which allows us to issue and sell unsecured short-term promissory notes pursuant to a revolving credit agreementprivate placement exemption from the registration requirements under federal and state securities laws, we entered into new dealer agreements with JPMorganvarious banks and a new Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as initial lender (JP Morgan). Effective on December 22, 2014, Deutsche Bank Trust Companies Americas became the Successor Issuing and administrative agent; and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (the 2012 Credit Agreement). On July 2, 2012,Paying Agent replacing JP Morgan. Since that time, we repaid the $1.7 billion and the 2012 Credit Agreement expired pursuant to its terms.
On May 27, 2011, wehave entered into two revolving creditnew dealer agreements with BNP Paribas, as initial lenderadditional banks. As of May 31, 2016 and administrative agent, and BNP Paribas Securities Corp., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (the 20112015, we did not have any outstanding commercial paper notes. We intend to back-stop any commercial paper notes that we may issue in the future with the 2013 Credit Agreements), and borrowed $1.15 billion pursuant to these agreements. During fiscal 2012, we repaid the $1.15 billion and the 2011 Credit Agreements expired pursuant to their terms.Agreement.
| 9. | RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES |
Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan
During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, our management approved, committed to and initiated plans to restructure and further improve efficiencies in our operations due to our acquisition of MICROS and certain other operational activities (2015 Restructuring Plan). Restructuring costs associated with the 2015 Restructuring Plan were recorded to the restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations as they were incurred. We recorded $462 million and $100 million of restructuring expenses in connection with the 2015 Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. Actions pursuant to the 2015 Restructuring Plan were substantially complete as of May 31, 2016.
Fiscal 2013 Oracle Restructuring Plan
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, our management approved, committed to and initiated plans to restructure and further improve efficiencies in our operations (the 2013(2013 Restructuring Plan). Our management subsequently amended the 2013 Restructuring Plan in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to reflect additional actions that we expect to take. The total estimated restructuring costs associated with the 2013 Restructuring Plan are $420 million and will be recorded to the restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations as they are incurred. We recorded $325 million of restructuring expenses in connection with the 2013 Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2013 and we expect to incur the majority of the estimated remaining $95 million through fiscal 2014. Any changes to the estimates of executing the 2013 Restructuring Plan will be reflected in our future results of operations.
Sun Restructuring Plan
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, our management approved, committed to and initiated a plan to restructure our operations due to our acquisition of Sun (the Sun Restructuring Plan) in order to improve the cost efficiencies in our merged operations.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Restructuring costs associated with the Sun Restructuring Plan were recorded to the restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations as they were recognized.incurred. We recorded $215$119 million and $439$174 million of net restructuring expenses in connection with the Sun2013 Restructuring Plan in fiscal 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The execution ofActions pursuant to the Sun2013 Restructuring Plan waswere substantially complete as of the end of fiscal 2012.2015.
Summary of All Plans
Fiscal 2013 Activity
| Accrued May 31, 2012(2) | Accrued May 31, 2013(2) | Total Costs Accrued to Date | Total Expected Program Costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended May 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2013 Oracle Restructuring Plan(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions | $ | — | $ | 85 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 16 | $ | 77 | $ | 86 | |||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | — | 13 | (6 | ) | (11 | ) | 5 | 1 | 7 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems business | — | 99 | (5 | ) | (68 | ) | (2 | ) | 24 | 94 | 133 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Services | — | 72 | (5 | ) | (50 | ) | 1 | 18 | 67 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative and other | — | 81 | (1 | ) | (52 | ) | (16 | ) | 12 | 80 | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total Fiscal 2013 Oracle Restructuring Plan | $ | — | $ | 350 | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (241 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 71 | $ | 325 | $ | 420 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total other restructuring plans(6) | $ | 337 | $ | 53 | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (185 | ) | $ | — | $ | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Total restructuring plans | $ | 337 | $ | 403 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (426 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 250 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2012 Activity
| Accrued May 31, 2011 | Year Ended May 31, 2012 | Accrued May 31, 2012(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sun Restructuring Plan(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions | $ | 14 | $ | 46 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 9 | |||||||||
Software license updates and product support | 19 | 31 | (2 | ) | (35 | ) | (1 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Hardware systems business | 10 | 34 | 1 | (33 | ) | — | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
Services | 9 | 32 | (2 | ) | (25 | ) | (2 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative and other | 100 | 92 | (9 | ) | (129 | ) | (1 | ) | 53 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Sun Restructuring | $ | 152 | $ | 235 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (263 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 98 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total other restructuring plans(6) | $ | 297 | $ | 65 | $ | 15 | $ | (122 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 239 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total restructuring plans | $ | 449 | $ | 300 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (385 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 337 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Summary of All Plans
Fiscal 20112016 Activity
| Accrued May 31, 2010 | Year Ended May 31, 2011 | Accrued May 31, 2011 | Accrued May 31, 2015(2) | Year Ended May 31, 2016 | Accrued May 31, 2016(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun Restructuring Plan(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions | $ | 5 | $ | 67 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (55 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software and on-premise software | $ | 11 | $ | 95 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | 3 | 52 | (1 | ) | (34 | ) | (1 | ) | 19 | 5 | 168 | (1 | ) | (69 | ) | 2 | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware systems business | 42 | 53 | (3 | ) | (83 | ) | 1 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services | 8 | 49 | (4 | ) | (43 | ) | (1 | ) | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware business | 6 | 67 | (8 | ) | (43 | ) | 1 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services business | 9 | 44 | (4 | ) | (35 | ) | — | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative and other | 29 | 226 | 4 | (154 | ) | (5 | ) | 100 | 5 | 108 | — | (56 | ) | (2 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Sun Restructuring | $ | 87 | $ | 447 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (369 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan | $ | 36 | $ | 482 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (263 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | 238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other restructuring plans(6) | $ | 459 | $ | 57 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (223 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | 297 | $ | 84 | $ | 2 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total restructuring plans | $ | 546 | $ | 504 | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (592 | ) | $ | 16 | $ | 449 | $ | 120 | $ | 484 | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (290 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 283 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2015 Activity
| Accrued May 31, 2014 | Year Ended May 31, 2015 | Accrued May 31, 2015(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software and on-premise software | $ | — | $ | 26 | $ | 1 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | — | $ | 11 | |||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | — | 7 | — | (2 | ) | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Hardware business | — | 22 | (2 | ) | (13 | ) | (1 | ) | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Services business | — | 21 | — | (12 | ) | — | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative and other | — | 27 | (2 | ) | (20 | ) | — | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Fiscal 2015 Oracle Restructuring Plan | $ | — | $ | 103 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 36 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Fiscal 2013 Oracle Restructuring Plan(6) | $ | 61 | $ | 128 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (138 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 31 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total other restructuring plans(6) | $ | 108 | $ | 7 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | — | $ | 53 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total restructuring plans | $ | 169 | $ | 238 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 120 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Fiscal 2014 Activity
| Accrued May 31, 2013 | Year Ended May 31, 2014 | Accrued May 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Initial Costs(3) | Adj. to Cost(4) | Cash Payments | Others(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fiscal 2013 Oracle Restructuring Plan | $ | 71 | $ | 197 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (195 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | 61 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total other restructuring plans(6) | $ | 179 | $ | 24 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 108 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total restructuring plans | $ | 250 | $ | 221 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (253 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 169 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| (1) | Restructuring costs recorded for individual line items |
| (2) | The balances at May 31, |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| (3) | Costs recorded for the respective restructuring plans during the current period presented. |
| (4) | All plan adjustments were changes in estimates whereby increases and decreases in costs were generally recorded to operating expenses in the period of adjustments. |
| (5) | Represents foreign currency translation and certain other adjustments. |
| (6) | Other restructuring plans presented in the |
| 10. | DEFERRED REVENUES |
Deferred revenues consisted of the following:
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support | $ | 5,705 | $ | 5,565 | $ | 5,864 | $ | 5,635 | ||||||||
Hardware systems support and other | 706 | 714 | ||||||||||||||
Cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS | 705 | 404 | ||||||||||||||
Hardware support and other | 675 | 703 | ||||||||||||||
Services | 381 | 403 | 339 | 379 | ||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions | 326 | 353 | ||||||||||||||
New software licenses | 72 | 124 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Deferred revenues, current | 7,118 | 7,035 | 7,655 | 7,245 | ||||||||||||
Deferred revenues, non-current (in other non-current liabilities) | 312 | 296 | 536 | 393 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total deferred revenues | $ | 7,430 | $ | 7,331 | $ | 8,191 | $ | 7,638 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Deferred software license updates and product support revenues and deferred hardware systems support revenues represent customer payments made in advance for support contracts that are typically billed on a per annum basis in advance with corresponding revenues being recognized ratably over the support periods. Deferred cloud SaaS, PaaS and IaaS revenues generally resulted from customer payments made in advance for our cloud-based offerings that are recognized over the corresponding contractual term. Deferred services revenues include prepayments for our services business and revenues for these services are generally recognized as the services are performed. Deferred new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues typically resultresulted from undelivered products or specified enhancements, customer specificcustomer-specific acceptance provisions, customer payments made in advance for time-based license arrangements including cloud software
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
subscriptions offerings that are typically billed in advance and recognized over the corresponding contractual term, and software license transactions that cannot be segmentedseparated from undelivered consulting or other services.
In connection with our acquisitions, we have estimated the fair values of the cloud software subscriptions,SaaS and PaaS, software license updates and product support, and hardware systems support obligations, among others, assumed from our acquired companies. We generally have estimated the fair values of thethese obligations assumed using a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the obligations plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to assume thethese acquired obligations. TheThese aforementioned fair value adjustments recorded for obligations assumed from our acquisitions reduced the new software licensescloud SaaS and cloud software subscriptions,PaaS, software license updates and product support and hardware systems support deferred revenues balances that we recorded as liabilities from these acquisitions and also reduced the resulting revenues that we recognized or will recognize over the terms of the acquired obligations during the post-combination periods.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| 11. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Fair Value Hedges—Interest Rate Swap Agreements
In September 2009,July 2014, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements that have the economic effect of modifying the fixed interestfixed-interest obligations associated with our 2014October 2019 Notes and July 2021 Notes so that the interest payable on these senior notes effectively became variable based on LIBOR. In July 2013, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements that have the economic effect of modifying the fixed-interest obligations associated with our January 2019 Notes so that the interest payable on these senior notes effectively became variable based on LIBOR. The critical terms of the interest rate swap agreements match the critical terms of the October 2019 Notes, July 2021 Notes and the 2014January 2019 Notes match,that the interest rate swap agreements pertain to, including the notional amounts and maturity dates. Accordingly, we
We have designated thesethe aforementioned interest rate swap agreements as qualifying hedging instruments and are accounting for them as fair value hedges pursuant to ASC 815. These transactions are characterized as fair value hedges for financial accounting purposes because they protect us against changes in the fair valuevalues of certain of our fixed ratefixed-rate borrowings due to benchmark interest rate movements. The changes in fair values of these interest rate swap agreements are recognized as interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations with the corresponding amounts included in other assets or other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. The amount of net gain (loss) attributable to the risk being hedged is recognized as interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations with the corresponding amount included in notes payable, and other non-current borrowings.non-current. The periodic interest settlements which occur atfor the same interval asinterest rate swap agreements for the 2014October 2019 Notes, July 2021 Notes and the January 2019 Notes are recorded as interest expense. The fair valuesexpense and are included as a part of thesecash flows from operating activities.
In July 2014, we settled the fixed to variable interest rate swap agreements recorded as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets were $41 million and $69 million as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
associated with the July 2014 Notes. We do not use any interest rate swap agreements for trading purposes.
Cash Flow Hedges—Cross-Currency Swap Agreements
In connection with the issuance of our January 2021 Notes, we entered into certain cross-currency swap agreements to manage the related foreign currency exchange risk by effectively converting the fixed-rate, Euro-denominated January 2021 Notes, including the annual interest payments and the payment of principal at maturity, to fixed-rate, U.S. Dollar-denominated debt. The economic effect of the swap agreements was to eliminate the uncertainty of the cash flows in U.S. Dollars associated with the January 2021 Notes by fixing the principal amount of the January 2021 Notes at $1.6 billion with a fixed annual interest rate of 3.53%. We have designated these cross-currency swap agreements as qualifying hedging instruments and are accounting for these as cash flow hedges pursuant to ASC 815. The critical terms of the cross-currency swap agreements correspond to the January 2021 Notes, including the annual interest payments being hedged, and the cross-currency swap agreements mature at the same time as the January 2021 Notes.
We used the hypothetical derivative method to measure the effectiveness of our cross-currency swap agreements. The fair values of these cross-currency swap agreements are recognized as other assets or other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. The effective portions of the changes in fair values of these cross-currency swap agreements are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets, and an amount is reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss into non-operating income (expense), net in the same period that the carrying value of the Euro-denominated January 2021 Notes is remeasured and the interest expense is recognized. The ineffective portion of the unrealized gains and losses on these cross-currency swaps, if any, is recorded immediately to non-operating income (expense), net. We evaluate the effectiveness of our cross-currency swap agreements on a quarterly basis. We did not record any ineffectiveness for fiscal 2016, 2015 or 2014. The cash flows related to the cross-currency swap agreements that
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
pertain to the periodic interest settlements are classified as operating activities and the cash flows that pertain to the principal balance are classified as financing activities.
We do not use any cross-currency swap agreements for trading purposes.
Net Investment Hedge—Foreign Currency Borrowings
In July 2013, we designated our July 2025 Notes as a net investment hedge of our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency in order to reduce the volatility in stockholders’ equity caused by the changes in foreign currency exchange rates of the Euro with respect to the U.S. Dollar.
We used the spot method to measure the effectiveness of our net investment hedge. Under this method, for each reporting period, the change in the carrying value of the Euro-denominated July 2025 Notes due to remeasurement of the effective portion is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheet and the remaining change in the carrying value of the ineffective portion, if any, is recognized in non-operating income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. We evaluate the effectiveness of our net investment hedge at the beginning of every quarter. We did not record any ineffectiveness for fiscal 2016, 2015 or 2014.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts Not Designated as Hedges
We transact business in various foreign currencies and have established a program that primarily utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures. Under this program, our strategy is to enter into foreign currency forward contracts so that increases or decreases in our foreign currency exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with our foreign currency transactions. We may suspend this program from time to time. Our foreign currency exposures typically arise from intercompany sublicense fees, intercompany loans and other intercompany transactions that are generally expected to be cash settled in the near term. Our foreign currency forward contracts are generally short-term in duration. Our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to currency fluctuations will generally depend on the size and type of cross-currency exposures that we enter into, the currency exchange rates associated with these exposures and changes in those rates, the net realized and unrealized gains or losses on foreign currency forward contracts to offset these exposures and other factors.
We neitherNeither do we use these foreign currency forward contracts for trading purposes nor do we designate these forward contracts as hedging instruments pursuant to ASC 815. Accordingly, we recorded the fair values of these contracts as of the end of our reporting period to our consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair values recorded to our consolidated statement of operations. The balance sheet classification for the fair values of these forward contracts is prepaid expenses and other current assets for a netforward contracts in an unrealized gain position and other current liabilities for a netforward contracts in an unrealized loss position. The statement of operations classification for changes in fair values of these forward contracts is non-operating income (expense), net, for both realized and unrealized gains and losses.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
As of May 31, 2013
As of both May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, the notional amounts of the forward contracts we held to purchase U.S. Dollars in exchange for other major international currencies were $3.0 billion. As of May 31, 2013$2.7 billion and 2012,$2.2 billion, respectively, and the notional amounts of forward contracts we held to sell U.S. Dollars in exchange for other major international currencies were $1.1$2.0 billion and $873 million,$1.2 billion, respectively. The fair values of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were nominal at May 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015.
Included in our non-operating income (expense), net were $(64)$97 million, $43$60 million and $(39)$(69) million of net gains (losses) gains related to these forward contracts for the years ended May 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The cash flows related to these foreign currency contracts are classified as operating activities.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
The effects of derivative and non-derivative instruments designated as hedges on certain of our consolidated financial statements were as follows as of or for each of the respective periods presented below (amounts presented exclude any income tax effects):
Fair Values of Derivative and Non-Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedges in Consolidated Balance Sheets
| Fair Value as of May 31, | ||||||||||
(in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges | Other assets | $ | 122 | $ | 74 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cross-currency swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges | Other non-current liabilities | $ | (218 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | |||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Foreign currency borrowings designated as net investment hedge | Notes payable, non-current | $ | (991 | ) | $ | (981 | ) | |||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Effects of Derivative and Non-Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedges on Income and Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) or Loss (OCL)
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated OCI or OCL (Effective Portion) | Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Cross-currency swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges | $ | 26 | $ | (318 | ) | Non-operating income (expense), net | $ | 41 | $ | (348 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Foreign currency borrowings designated as net investment hedge | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 208 | Not applicable | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Location and Amount of Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative | Location and Amount of Loss on Hedged Item Recognized in Income Attributable to Risk Being Hedged | |||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges | Interest expense | $ | 48 | $ | 51 | Interest expense | $ | (48 | ) | $ | (51 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| 12. | COMMITMENTS AND CERTAIN CONTINGENCIES |
Lease Commitments
We lease certain facilities, furniture and equipment under operating leases. As of May 31, 2013,2016, future minimum annual operating lease payments and future minimum payments to be received from non-cancelable subleases were as follows:
(in millions) | ||||||||
Fiscal 2014 | $ | 358 | ||||||
Fiscal 2015 | 293 | |||||||
Fiscal 2016 | 230 | |||||||
Fiscal 2017 | 170 | $ | 328 | |||||
Fiscal 2018 | 117 | 273 | ||||||
Fiscal 2019 | 211 | |||||||
Fiscal 2020 | 152 | |||||||
Fiscal 2021 | 110 | |||||||
Thereafter | 238 | 164 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Future minimum operating lease payments | 1,406 | 1,238 | ||||||
Less: minimum payments to be received from non-cancelable subleases | (84 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
|
| |||||||
Total future minimum operating lease payments, net | $ | 1,322 | $ | 1,181 | ||||
|
| |||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Lease commitments included future minimum rent payments for facilities that we have vacated pursuant to our restructuring and merger integration activities, as discussed in Note 9. We have approximately $158$54 million in facility obligations, net of estimated sublease income and other costs, in accrued restructuring for these locations in our consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2013.2016.
Rent expense was $313$283 million, $329$290 million and $406$278 million for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, net of sublease income of approximately $69$45 million $89for each of fiscal 2016 and 2015, and $55 million and $85 million, respectively.for fiscal 2014. Certain lease agreements contain renewal options providing for extensions of the lease terms.
Unconditional Obligations
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into certain unconditional purchase obligations with our suppliers, which are agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and specify terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the payment. We utilize several external manufacturers to manufacture sub-assemblies for our hardware products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished hardware products. We also obtain individual components for our hardware systems products from a variety of individual suppliers based on projected demand information. Such purchase commitments are based on our forecasted component and manufacturing requirements and typically provide for fulfillment within agreed upon lead-times and/or commercially standard lead-times for the particular part or product and have been included in the amounts below. Routine arrangements for other materials and goods that are not related to our external manufacturers and certain other suppliers and that are entered into in the ordinary course of business are not included in the amounts below, as they are generally entered into in order to secure pricing or other negotiated terms and are difficult to quantify in a meaningful way.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
As of May 31, 2013,2016, our unconditional purchase and certain other obligations were as follows (in millions):
Fiscal 2014 | $ | 763 | ||
Fiscal 2015 | 26 | |||
Fiscal 2016 | 4 | |||
Fiscal 2017 | 1 | |||
Fiscal 2018 | 1 | |||
Thereafter | 11 | |||
|
| |||
Total | $ | 806 | ||
|
|
Fiscal 2017 | $ | 574 | ||
Fiscal 2018 | 153 | |||
Fiscal 2019 | 91 | |||
Fiscal 2020 | 68 | |||
Fiscal 2021 | 8 | |||
|
| |||
Total | $ | 894 | ||
|
|
We have a commitment to acquire a company for cash consideration that we expect to pay upon the closing of this acquisition. As described in Note 8 and Note 11 above, as of May 31, 2016 we have senior notes payable and other borrowings outstanding of $18.5$43.9 billion that mature at various future dates.dates and derivative financial instruments outstanding that we leverage to manage certain risks and exposures.
Guarantees
Our software, cloud and hardware systems product sales agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our products infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights. To date, we have not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications and have not accrued any material liabilities related to such obligations in our consolidated financial statements. Certain of our product sales agreements also include provisions indemnifying customers against liabilities in the event we breach confidentiality or service level requirements. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to our limited and infrequent history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
Our software license and hardware systems products agreements also generally include a warranty that our products will substantially operate as described in the applicable program documentation for a period of one year after delivery. Our SaaS, PaaS and IaaS agreements generally include a warranty that the cloud services will be
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
performed in all material respects as defined in the agreement during the service period. We also warrant that services we perform will be provided in a manner consistent with industry standards for a period of 90 days from performance of the service.services.
We occasionally are required, for various reasons, to enter into financial guarantees with third parties in the ordinary course of our business including, among others, guarantees related to foreign exchange trades, taxes, import licenses and letters of credit on behalf of parties with whom we conduct business. Such agreements have not had a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
| 13. | STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Common Stock Repurchases
Our Board of Directors has approved a program for us to repurchase shares of our common stock. On June 18, 2012,March 15, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an expansion of our stock repurchase program by an additional $10.0 billion. On June 20, 2013, we announced that our BoardAs of Directors approved a further expansion by an additional $12.0 billion. Approximately $2.1May 31, 2016, approximately $8.8 billion remained available for stock repurchases as of May 31, 2013 pursuant to our stock repurchase program prior to the additional amount authorized in June 2013.program. We repurchased 346.1271.9 million shares for $11.0$10.4 billion (including 3.22.3 million shares for $109$94 million that were repurchased but not settled), 207.3193.7 million shares for $6.0$8.1 billion and 40.4280.4 million shares for $1.2$9.8 billion in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, under the stock repurchase program.
Our stock repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date and the pace of our repurchase activity will depend on factors such as our working capital needs, our cash requirements for acquisitions and dividend payments, our debt repayment obligations or repurchaserepurchases of our debt, our stock price, and economic and market conditions. Our stock repurchases may be effected from time to time through open market purchases or pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Our stock repurchase program may be accelerated, suspended, delayed or discontinued at any time.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Dividends on Common Stock
During fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, our Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.30, $0.24$0.60, $0.51 and $0.21$0.48 per share of our outstanding common stock, respectively, which we paid during the same period.
The cash dividends of $0.30 per share of outstanding common stock declared by our Board of Directors during fiscal 2013 included an accelerated cash dividend of $0.18 per share of outstanding common stock paid on December 21, 2012. This accelerated cash dividend was intended by our Board of Directors to be in lieu of quarterly dividends that we would have otherwise announced with our earnings results for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2013, and that would have been paid in calendar year 2013. During fiscal 2012, we declared and paid cash dividends totaling $0.24 per share of outstanding common stock.
In June 2013,2016, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12$0.15 per share of our outstanding common stock. This $0.12 per share cash dividend was an increase of $0.06 per share over the last regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share of outstanding common stock paid on November 2, 2012 and was declared earlier than the Board of Directors had previously planned. The $0.12 per share cash dividend is payable on August 2, 2013July 27, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 12, 2013. We currently expect to continue paying comparable cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future; however, future6, 2016. Future declarations of dividends and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the final determination of our Board of Directors.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeLoss
The following table summarizes, as of each balance sheet date, the components of our accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income,loss, net of income taxes:
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation (losses) gains and other, net | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 120 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation losses and other, net | $ | (778 | ) | $ | (851 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized losses on defined benefit plans, net | (176 | ) | (108 | ) | (254 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net | 80 | 100 | 196 | 124 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net | 20 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 112 | |||||||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (816 | ) | $ | (996 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| 14. | EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
Stock-based Compensation Plans
Stock Option Plans
In fiscal 2001, we adopted the 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, which provides for the issuance of long-term performance awards, including restricted stock-based awards, non-qualified stock options and incentive stock options, as well as stock purchase rights and stock appreciation rights, and long-term performance awards to our eligible employees, officers and directors who are also employees or consultants, independent consultants and advisers. In fiscal 2011, our stockholders, upon the recommendation of our Board of Directors (the Board), approved the adoption of the Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the 2000 Plan), which extended the termination date of the 2000 Plan by ten10 years and increased the number of authorized shares of stock that may be issued by 388,313,015 shares. In fiscal 2014, our stockholders, upon the recommendation of our Board, approved a further increase in the number of authorized shares of stock that may be issued under the 2000 Plan by 305,000,000 shares. Under the terms of the 2000 Plan, optionslong-term full value awards are granted in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs). The vesting schedule for RSUs is established by the Compensation Committee and generally requires vesting 25% annually over four years. The vesting schedule for PSUs is also established by the Compensation Committee and currently requires vesting over four fiscal years, if at all, based on performance. Options to purchase common stock are granted at not less than fair market value, become exercisable as established by the Compensation Committee of the Board (generally 25% annually over four years under our current practice) and generally expire no more than ten10 years from the date of grant. For each share granted as a full value award under the 2000 Plan, an equivalent of 2.5 shares is deducted from our pool of shares available for grant. As of May 31, 2013,2016, the 2000 Plan had 47 million unvested RSUs outstanding, 4 million unvested PSUs outstanding and stock options to purchase 426367 million shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2000 Plan, of which 180246 million shares were vested. As of May 31, 2013,2016, approximately 296317 million shares of common stock were available for future awards under the 2000 Plan. To date, we have not issued any stock purchase rights or stock appreciation rights restricted stock-based awards or long-term performance awards under the 2000 Plan.
In fiscal 1993, the Board adopted the 1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the Directors’ Plan), which provides for the issuance of RSUs and other stock-based awards, including non-qualified stock options, to non-employee directors. The Directors’ Plan has from time to time been amended and restated. Under the terms of the Directors’ Plan, options to purchase 10 million shares of common stock wereare reserved for issuance
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
(including (including a fiscal 2013 amendment to increase the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance by 2 million shares),. In prior years, we granted stock options are granted at not less than fair market value, become exercisablethat vest over four years, and expire no more than ten10 years from the date of grant. The Directors’ Plan provides forwas most recently amended on April 29, 2016 and permits the Compensation Committee of the Board to determine the amount and form of automatic grants of optionsstock awards to each non-employee director upon first becoming a director and thereafter on an annual basis, as well as automatic nondiscretionary grants for chairing certain Board committees. The Board will determine the particular terms of any such stock awards at the time of grant, but the terms will be consistent with those of options granted undercommittees, subject to certain stockholder approved limitations set forth in the Directors’ Plan with respect to vesting or forfeiture schedules and treatment on termination of status as a director.Plan. As of May 31, 2013,2016, approximately 147,000 unvested RSUs and stock options to purchase approximately 3 million shares of common stock were outstanding under the 1993 Directors’ Plan, of(of which approximately 2 million were vested.vested) were outstanding under the Directors’ Plan. As of May 31, 2013,2016, approximately 21 million shares were available for future optionstock awards under this plan.
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we assumed certain outstanding stock options and other restricted stock-based awards ofand stock options under each acquiree’sacquired company’s respective stock plans. These stock options and other restricted stock-based awards and stock options generally retain all of the rights, terms and conditions of the respective plans under which they were originally granted. As of May 31, 2013,2016, approximately 491,000 shares of restricted stock-based awards and stock options to purchase 185 million shares of common stock and 1 million shares of restricted stock-based awards were outstanding under these plans.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for our last three fiscal years ended May 31, 2013:
| Options Outstanding | ||||||||
(in millions, except exercise price) | Shares Under Option | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||
Balance, May 31, 2010 | 352 | $ | 18.84 | |||||
Granted | 110 | $ | 22.58 | |||||
Assumed | 1 | $ | 16.38 | |||||
Exercised | (78 | ) | $ | 16.73 | ||||
Canceled | (31 | ) | $ | 29.17 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2011 | 354 | $ | 19.53 | |||||
Granted | 112 | $ | 32.05 | |||||
Assumed | 8 | $ | 12.17 | |||||
Exercised | (39 | ) | $ | 16.61 | ||||
Canceled | (13 | ) | $ | 29.31 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2012 | 422 | $ | 22.66 | |||||
Granted | 119 | $ | 29.90 | |||||
Assumed | 9 | $ | 32.52 | |||||
Exercised | (83 | ) | $ | 17.38 | ||||
Canceled | (20 | ) | $ | 28.94 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2013 | 447 | $ | 25.48 | |||||
|
| |||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Restricted stock-based award activity and the number of restricted stock-based awards outstanding were not significant prior to fiscal 2015. The following table summarizes restricted stock-based award activity, including service-based awards and performance-based awards and including awards granted pursuant to Oracle-based stock plans and stock plans assumed from our acquisitions for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
| Restricted Stock-Based Awards Outstanding | ||||||||
(in millions, except fair value) | Number of Shares | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||
Balance, May 31, 2014 | 1 | $ | 35.29 | |||||
Granted | 28 | $ | 40.73 | |||||
Canceled | (1 | ) | $ | 39.52 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2015 | 28 | $ | 40.63 | |||||
Granted | 34 | $ | 38.50 | |||||
Vested | (7 | ) | $ | 40.39 | ||||
Canceled | (3 | ) | $ | 39.73 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2016 | 52 | $ | 39.29 | |||||
|
| |||||||
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock-based awards that vested in fiscal 2016 and 2015 was $261 million and $28 million, respectively. As of May 31, 2016, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock-based awards was $1.3 billion and is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.88 years.
In fiscal 2016 and 2015, 2 million and 3 million PSUs were granted, respectively, which vest upon the attainment of certain performance metrics and service-based vesting. Based upon actual attainment relative to the “target” performance metric, certain participants have the ability to be issued up to 150% of the target number of PSUs originally granted, or to be issued no PSUs at all. In fiscal 2016, 463,000 PSUs vested and 4 million PSUs remained outstanding as of May 31, 2016.
The following table summarizes stock option activity and includes awards granted pursuant to Oracle-based stock plans and stock plans assumed from our acquisitions for our last three fiscal years ended May 31, 2016:
| Options Outstanding | ||||||||
(in millions, except exercise price) | Shares Under Option | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||
Balance, May 31, 2013 | 447 | $ | 25.48 | |||||
Granted | 131 | $ | 31.02 | |||||
Assumed | 5 | $ | 9.02 | |||||
Exercised | (95 | ) | $ | 21.51 | ||||
Canceled | (26 | ) | $ | 30.60 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2014 | 462 | $ | 27.37 | |||||
Granted | 34 | $ | 40.54 | |||||
Assumed | 3 | $ | 21.98 | |||||
Exercised | (70 | ) | $ | 24.49 | ||||
Canceled | (16 | ) | $ | 33.76 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2015 | 413 | $ | 28.64 | |||||
Granted(1) | 25 | $ | 40.34 | |||||
Assumed | 1 | $ | 4.97 | |||||
Exercised | (53 | ) | $ | 25.13 | ||||
Canceled | (11 | ) | $ | 35.19 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Balance, May 31, 2016 | 375 | $ | 29.66 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| (1) | Approximately 7 million of the 25 million stock options granted during fiscal 2016 were to our Chief Executive Officers and Chief Technology Officer and had contractual lives of five years versus the 10-year contractual lives for the other stock options granted. |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Options outstanding that have vested and that are expected to vest as of May 31, 20132016 were as follows:
| Outstanding Options (in millions) | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contract Term (in years) | In-the-Money Options as of May 31, 2013 (in millions) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) (in millions) | Outstanding Options (in millions) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contract Term (in years) | In-the-Money Options as of May 31, 2016 (in millions) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested | 193 | $ | 21.17 | 5.15 | 189 | $ | 2,491 | 253 | $ | 27.52 | 4.83 | 245 | $ | 3,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected to vest(2) | 228 | $ | 28.60 | 8.20 | 224 | 1,215 | 115 | $ | 33.91 | 7.20 | 76 | 736 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 421 | $ | 25.20 | 6.80 | 413 | $ | 3,706 | 368 | $ | 29.52 | 5.57 | 321 | $ | 3,968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the gross difference between our closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal |
| (2) | The unrecognized compensation expense calculated under the fair value method for shares expected to vest (unvested shares net of expected forfeitures) as of May 31, |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Valuation of Stock OptionsAwards
Stock-based compensation is included in the following operating expense line items in our consolidated statements of operations:
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 147 | $ | 122 | $ | 87 | ||||||
Software license updates and product support | 20 | 18 | 14 | |||||||||
Hardware systems products | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Hardware systems support | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||
Services | 31 | 23 | 16 | |||||||||
Research and development | 352 | 295 | 231 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 164 | 162 | 145 | |||||||||
Acquisition related and other | 33 | 33 | 10 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total stock-based compensation | 755 | 659 | 510 | |||||||||
Estimated income tax benefit included in provision for income taxes | (243 | ) | (216 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total stock-based compensation, net of estimated income tax benefit | $ | 512 | $ | 443 | $ | 340 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
We estimateestimated the fair values of our share-based paymentsrestricted stock-based awards that are solely subject to service-based vesting requirements based upon their intrinsic values as of the grant dates.
The fair values of our PSUs were also measured based upon their intrinsic values as of their respective grant dates. The vesting conditions and related terms of our PSUs were communicated to each participating employee as of their respective grant dates and included attainment metrics that were defined, fixed and based upon consistent U.S. GAAP metrics or internal metrics that are defined, fixed and consistently determined, and that require the employee to render service. Therefore, these awards met the performance-based award classification criteria as defined within ASC 718.
We estimated the fair values of our stock options using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair values of stock options. Option valuation models, including the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, require the input of assumptions, including stock price volatility. Changes in the input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates and ultimately how much we recognize as stock-based compensation expense. The fair values of our stock options were estimated at the grant dates or at the acquisition dates for options assumed in a business combination. The weighted averageweighted-average input assumptions used and resulting fair values of our stock options were as follows for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011:2014:
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Expected life (in years) | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.7% | 1.6% | 1.8% | |||||||||
Volatility | 31% | 30% | 33% | |||||||||
Dividend yield | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | |||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per share | $ | 7.99 | $ | 9.30 | $ | 6.61 | ||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
Expected life (in years) | 4.8 | 5.1 | 4.9 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.6% | 1.7% | 1.3% | |||||||||
Volatility | 24% | 23% | 27% | |||||||||
Dividend yield | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per share | $ | 8.49 | $ | 9.62 | $ | 7.47 | ||||||
The expected life input is based on historical exercise patterns and post-vesting termination behavior, the risk-free interest rate input is based on U.S. Treasury instruments, the annualized dividend yield input is based on the per share dividend declared by our Board of Directors and the volatility input is calculated based on the implied volatility of our publicly traded options.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Stock-based compensation was included in the following operating expense line items in our consolidated statements of operations:
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 220 | $ | 180 | $ | 165 | ||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service | 17 | 10 | 8 | |||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service | 4 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||
Software license updates and product support | 23 | 21 | 22 | |||||||||
Hardware products | 7 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||
Hardware support | 5 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||
Services | 29 | 30 | 29 | |||||||||
Research and development | 609 | 522 | 385 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 120 | 148 | 171 | |||||||||
Acquisition related and other | 3 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total stock-based compensation | $ | 1,037 | $ | 933 | $ | 805 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Estimated income tax benefit included in provision for income taxes | (322 | ) | (294 | ) | (260 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total stock-based compensation, net of estimated income tax benefit | $ | 715 | $ | 639 | $ | 545 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Tax Benefits from Exercise of Stock Options and Vesting of Restricted Stock-Based Awards
Total cash received as a result of option exercises was approximately $1.4$1.3 billion, $622 million$1.7 billion and $1.3$2.0 billion for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised and vesting of restricted stock-based awards and options exercised was $1.0 billion, $1.3 billion $587 million and $1.1$1.5 billion for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. In connection with these exercises andthe vesting of restricted stock-based awards and stock option exercises, the tax benefits realized by us were $410$311 million, $182$396 million and $325$480 million for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Of the total tax benefits received, we classified excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $241$124 million, $97$244 million and $215$250 million as cash flows from financing activities rather than cash flows from operating activities for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Purchase Plan) that allows employees to purchase shares of common stock at a price per share that is 95% of the fair market value of Oracle stock as of the end of the semi-annual option period. As of May 31, 2013, 642016, 54 million shares were reserved for future issuances under the Purchase Plan. We issued 3 million shares under the Purchase Plan in fiscal 2013 and 4 million shares in each of fiscal 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014.
Defined Contribution and Other Postretirement Plans
We offer various defined contribution plans for our U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Total defined contribution plan expense was $353$387 million, $344$362 million and $312$357 million for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The number of plan participants in our benefit plans has generally increased in recent years primarily as a result ofwe have hired additional employees and assumed eligible employees from our acquisitions.
In the United States, regular employees can participate in the Oracle Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (Oracle 401(k) Plan). Participants can generally contribute up to 40% of their eligible compensation on a per-pay-period basis as defined by the Oracle 401(k) Plan document or by the section 402(g) limit as defined by the United StatesU.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). We match a portion of employee contributions, currently 50% up to 6% of compensation each pay period, subject to maximum aggregate matching amounts. Our contributions to the Oracle 401(k) Plan, net of forfeitures, were $129$153 million, $125$144 million and $119$134 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
We also offer non-qualified deferred compensation plans to certain key employees whereby they may defer a portion of their annual base and/or variable compensation until retirement or a date specified by the employee in accordance with the plans. Deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities were each approximately $320$419 million as of May 31, 20132016 and were each approximately $264$408 million as of May 31, 20122015 and were presented in other assets and other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
We sponsor certain defined benefit pension plans that are offered primarily by certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Many of these plans were assumed through our acquisitions or are required by local regulatory requirements. We may deposit funds for these plans with insurance companies, third partythird-party trustees, or into government-managed accounts consistent with local regulatory requirements, as applicable. Our total defined benefit plan pension expenses were $81$95 million, $55$69 million and $76$64 million for fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The aggregate projected benefit obligation and aggregate net liability (funded status) of our defined benefit plans as of May 31, 20132016 was $734$949 million and $364$587 million, respectively, and as of May 31, 20122015 was $691$1.0 billion and $599 million, and $297 million, respectively.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
| 15. | INCOME TAXES |
The following is a geographical breakdown of income before the provision for income taxes:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Domestic | $ | 6,614 | $ | 6,284 | $ | 6,378 | $ | 4,033 | $ | 5,136 | $ | 5,397 | ||||||||||||
Foreign | 7,284 | 6,678 | 5,033 | 7,409 | 7,698 | 8,307 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | $ | 13,898 | $ | 12,962 | $ | 11,411 | $ | 11,442 | $ | 12,834 | $ | 13,704 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Current provision: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 1,720 | $ | 1,611 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,301 | $ | 2,153 | $ | 1,613 | ||||||||||||
State | 254 | 257 | 263 | 271 | 310 | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | 1,116 | 1,104 | 1,037 | 1,074 | 981 | 1,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total current provision | $ | 3,090 | $ | 2,972 | $ | 3,117 | $ | 2,646 | $ | 3,444 | $ | 2,997 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred (benefit) provision: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred benefit: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal | $ | (179 | ) | $ | 267 | $ | (179 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (408 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | |||||||
State | 82 | 14 | 14 | (21 | ) | (46 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign | (20 | ) | (272 | ) | (88 | ) | 39 | (94 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total deferred (benefit) provision | $ | (117 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (253 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total deferred benefit | $ | (105 | ) | $ | (548 | ) | $ | (248 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total provision for income taxes | $ | 2,973 | $ | 2,981 | $ | 2,864 | $ | 2,541 | $ | 2,896 | $ | 2,749 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 21.4% | 23.0% | 25.1% | 22.2% | 22.6% | 20.1% | ||||||||||||||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
The provision for income taxes differed from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate to our income before provision for income taxes as follows:
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Tax provision at statutory rate | $ | 4,865 | $ | 4,537 | $ | 3,994 | ||||||
Foreign earnings at other than United States rates | (1,637 | ) | (1,474 | ) | (1,125 | ) | ||||||
State tax expense, net of federal benefit | 299 | 171 | 188 | |||||||||
Settlements and releases from judicial decisions and statute expirations, net | (144 | ) | (132 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||
Domestic production activity deduction | (155 | ) | (178 | ) | (206 | ) | ||||||
Other, net | (255 | ) | 57 | 66 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total provision for income taxes | $ | 2,973 | $ | 2,981 | $ | 2,864 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
| Year Ended May 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Tax provision at statutory rate | $ | 4,005 | $ | 4,492 | $ | 4,796 | ||||||
Foreign earnings at other than United States rates | (1,284 | ) | (1,627 | ) | (1,790 | ) | ||||||
State tax expense, net of federal benefit | 176 | 176 | 154 | |||||||||
Settlements and releases from judicial decisions and statute expirations, net | (150 | ) | (85 | ) | (168 | ) | ||||||
Domestic production activity deduction | (155 | ) | (188 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||
Other, net | (51 | ) | 128 | (69 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total provision for income taxes | $ | 2,541 | $ | 2,896 | $ | 2,749 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
The components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets were as follows:
| May 31, | May 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on stock | $ | (130 | ) | $ | (130 | ) | $ | (130 | ) | $ | (130 | ) | ||||
Acquired intangible assets | (1,795 | ) | (1,974 | ) | (1,482 | ) | (1,879 | ) | ||||||||
Unremitted earnings | (249 | ) | (322 | ) | (987 | ) | (646 | ) | ||||||||
Other | (33 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | (2,174 | ) | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | (2,632 | ) | $ | (2,666 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Accruals and allowances | $ | 481 | $ | 609 | $ | 492 | $ | 421 | ||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits | 997 | 905 | 1,149 | 1,123 | ||||||||||||
Differences in timing of revenue recognition | 158 | 196 | 351 | 335 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 243 | 253 | 9 | 155 | ||||||||||||
Tax credit and net operating loss carryforwards | 2,706 | 2,537 | 2,935 | 2,649 | ||||||||||||
Other | 44 | 50 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | $ | 4,629 | $ | 4,550 | $ | 4,936 | $ | 4,683 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Valuation allowance | $ | (999 | ) | $ | (728 | ) | $ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,024 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 1,456 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 1,131 | $ | 993 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Recorded as: | ||||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax assets | $ | 974 | $ | 877 | ||||||||||||
Non-current deferred tax assets | 766 | 595 | 1,291 | 1,458 | ||||||||||||
Current deferred tax liabilities (in other current liabilities) | (111 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-current deferred tax liabilities (in other non-current liabilities) | (173 | ) | (48 | ) | (160 | ) | (465 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 1,456 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 1,131 | $ | 993 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
We provide for United States income taxes on the undistributed earnings and the other outside basis temporary differences of foreign subsidiaries unless they are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we increased the number of foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower statutory rates than the United States, the earnings of which we consider to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. If these subsidiaries generate sufficient earnings in the future, our provision for income taxes may continue to be favorably affected to a meaningful extent, although any such favorable effects could be significantly reduced under a variety of circumstances. At May 31, 2013,2016, the amount of temporary differences related to undistributed earnings and other outside basis temporary differences of investments in foreign subsidiaries upon which United States income taxes have not been provided was approximately $26.2$42.6 billion and $6.9$8.3 billion, respectively. If these undistributed earnings were repatriated to the United States, or if the other outside basis differences were recognized in a taxable transaction, they would generate foreign tax credits that would reduce the federal tax liability associated with the foreign dividend or the otherwise taxable transaction. At May 31, 2013,2016, assuming a full utilization of the foreign tax credits, the potential net deferred tax liability associated with these temporary differences of undistributed earnings and other outside basis temporary differences would be approximately $8.0$13.3 billion and $2.2$2.7 billion, respectively.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Our net deferred tax assets were $1.5$1.1 billion and $1.4 billion$993 million as of May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. We believe it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized in the foreseeable future. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generation of sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to obtain benefit from the reversal of temporary differences, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. The amount of net deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income change.
The valuation allowance was $999 million$1.2 billion and $728 million$1.0 billion at May 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Substantially all of the valuation allowances as of May 31, 20132016 and 20122015 relate to tax assets established in purchase accounting. Any subsequent
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
reduction of that portion of the valuation allowance and the recognition of the associated tax benefits associated with our acquisitions will be recorded to our provision for income taxes subsequent to our final determination of the valuation allowance or the conclusion of the measurement period (as defined above), whichever comes first.
At May 31, 2013,2016, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.2 billion.$758 million. These losses expire in various years between fiscal 20162017 and fiscal 2032,2035 and are subject to limitations on their utilization. We had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.6$2.7 billion at May 31, 2013,2016, which expire between fiscal 20142017 and fiscal 2032,2035 and are subject to limitations on their utilization. We had total foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.8$1.6 billion at May 31, 2013,2016, which are subject to limitations on their utilization. Approximately $1.5$1.4 billion of these foreign net operating losses are not currently subject to expiration dates. The remainder of the foreign net operating losses, approximately $274$240 million, expire between fiscal 20142017 and fiscal 2033.2036. We had tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.1$1.2 billion at May 31, 2013,2016, which are subject to limitations on their utilization. Approximately $571$652 million of these tax credit carryforwards are not currently subject to expiration dates. The remainder of the tax credit carryforwards, approximately $554$541 million, expire in various years between fiscal 20142017 and fiscal 2033.2035.
We classify our unrecognized tax benefits as either current or non-current income taxes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The aggregate changes in the balance of our gross unrecognized tax benefits, including acquisitions, were as follows:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits as of June 1 | $ | 3,276 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 2,527 | $ | 4,038 | $ | 3,838 | $ | 3,601 | ||||||||||||
Increases related to tax positions from prior fiscal years | 279 | 99 | 128 | 350 | 119 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Decreases related to tax positions from prior fiscal years | (125 | ) | (169 | ) | (102 | ) | (111 | ) | (17 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||||||||||
Increases related to tax positions taken during current fiscal year | 312 | 522 | 639 | 461 | 316 | 307 | ||||||||||||||||||
Settlements with tax authorities | (71 | ) | (187 | ) | (23 | ) | (73 | ) | (30 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Lapses of statutes of limitation | (71 | ) | (84 | ) | (53 | ) | (73 | ) | (54 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other, net | 1 | (65 | ) | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments and other, net | (31 | ) | (134 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of May 31 | $ | 3,601 | $ | 3,276 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 4,561 | $ | 4,038 | $ | 3,838 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
As of May 31, 2013, $3.62016, 2015 and 2014, $3.1 billion, $2.8 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, of unrecognized benefits would affect our effective tax rate if recognized. We recognized interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in our provision for income taxes line of our consolidated statements of operations of $31$26 million, $46$102 million and $22$24 million during fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Interest and penalties accrued as of May 31, 20132016 and 20122015 were $666$765 million and $683$756 million, respectively.
Domestically, U.S. federal and state taxing authorities are currently examining income tax returns of Oracle and various acquired entities for years through fiscal 2012.2015. Many issues are at an advanced stage in the examination process, the most significant of which include the deductibility of certain royalty payments, transfer pricing, extraterritorial income exemptions, domestic production activity, stock-based compensationforeign tax credits, and research and development credits taken. Other issues are related to years with expiring statutes of limitation. With all of these
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
domestic audit issues considered in the aggregate, we believe it was reasonably possible that, as of May 31, 2013,2016, the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by as much as $381$228 million ($280176 million net of offsetting tax benefits). Our U.S. federal and, with some exceptions, our state income tax returns have been examined for all years prior to fiscal 20002007 and we are no longer subject to audit for those periods. Our U.S. state income tax returns, with some exceptions, have been examined for all years prior to fiscal 2004 and we are no longer subject to audit for those periods.
Internationally, tax authorities for numerous non-U.S. jurisdictions are also examining returns affecting our unrecognized tax benefits. We believe it was reasonably possible that, as of May 31, 2013,2016, the gross unrecognized tax benefits, could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) by as much as $125$199 million ($9374 million net of offsetting tax benefits) in the next 12 months, related primarily to transfer pricing. Other issues are related to years with expiring statutes of limitation. With some exceptions, we are generally no longer subject to tax examinations in non-U.S. jurisdictions for years prior to fiscal 1998.
ORACLE CORPORATION1997.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
We believe that we have adequately provided under GAAP for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax audits and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.audits. However, there can be no assurances as to the possible outcomes.outcomes or any related financial statement effect thereof. On July 27, 2015, inAltera Corp. v. Commissioner, the U.S. Tax Court issued an opinion related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in an intercompany cost-sharing arrangement. A final decision has yet to be issued by the U.S. Tax Court due to other outstanding issues related to the case. At this time, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement to include stock-based compensation from its regulations. We have reviewed this case and its impact on Oracle and concluded that no adjustment to the consolidated financial statements is appropriate at this time. We will continue to monitor ongoing developments and potential impacts to our consolidated financial statements.
We previously negotiated three successive unilateral Advance Pricing Agreements withare under audit by the IRS and various other domestic and foreign tax authorities with regards to income tax and indirect tax matters and are involved in various challenges and litigation in a number of countries, including, in particular, India, Brazil, and Korea, where the amounts under controversy are significant. In some, although not all, cases, we have reserved for potential adjustments to our provision for income taxes and accrual of indirect taxes that cover many of our intercompany transfer pricing issuesmay result from examinations by, or any negotiated agreements with, these tax authorities or final outcomes in judicial proceedings, and precludewe believe that the IRS from making a transfer pricing adjustment within the scopefinal outcome of these agreements. Theseexaminations, agreements were effective for fiscal years through May 31, 2006. Weor judicial proceedings will not have reached final agreement witha material effect on our results of operations. If events occur which indicate payment of these amounts is unnecessary, the IRS for renewalreversal of this Advance Pricing Agreement for the years ending May 31, 2007 through May 31, 2013. However, these agreements do not cover substantial elementsliabilities would result in the recognition of benefits in the period we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. If our transfer pricingestimates of the federal, state, and do not bindforeign income tax authorities outsideliabilities and indirect tax liabilities are less than the United States. We have finalized bilateral Advance Pricing Agreements, which are effective for the years ending May 31, 2002 through May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2007 through May 31, 2013.ultimate assessment, it would result in a further charge to expense.
| 16. | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
ASC 280,Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision makingdecision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker ismakers are our Chief Executive Officer.Officers. We are organized geographically and by line of business. While our Chief Executive Officer evaluatesOfficers evaluate results in a number of different ways, the line of business management structure is the primary basis for which the allocation of resources and financial results are assessed.
We have three businesses—cloud and on-premise software, hardware systems and services—which are further divided into certain operating segments. Our cloud and on-premise software business is comprised of twothree operating segments: (1) new software licenses and cloud software subscriptions and on-premise software, which includes our cloud SaaS and PaaS offerings, (2) cloud IaaS and (3) software license updates and product support. Our hardware systems business is comprised of two operating segments: (1) hardware systems products and (2) hardware systems support. All other operating segments are combined under our services business.
ORACLE CORPORATION
The new software licenses andNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
Our cloud software subscriptionsand on-premise software line of business is engaged in licensing our databasemarkets, sells and middleware software and our applications software, and providing access todelivers a broad rangespectrum of application and platform technologies through our SaaS and PaaS offerings, which are certain of our software offerings on a subscription basis throughapplications and platforms that are delivered via a cloud-based computing environment. Database and middleware software generally includes database and database management software; application server and cloud application software; Service-Oriented Architecture and business process management software; business intelligence software; identity and access management software; data integration software; web experience management, portals, content management and social network software; and development tools. Our database and middleware software product offerings also include Java, which is a global software development platform used in a wide range of computers, networks and devices. Applications software provides enterprise informationIT environment that enables companies towe host, manage and automate core business functions.support, and through the licensing of our software products including Oracle Applications, address specificOracle Database, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Java, among others.
The cloud IaaS line of business provides infrastructure cloud services that are enterprise-grade, hosted and industry requirements including human capital and talent management; customer experience and customer relationship management; financial management and governance, risk and compliance; procurement; project portfolio management; supply chain management; business analytics and enterprise performance management; and industry-specific applications.supported within the Oracle Cloud is a comprehensive set of cloud service offerings that is designed to provide customersperform elastic compute, storage and partners with access to application services, social networking services, platform services and common infrastructure services on a subscription basisbasis; and Oracle Managed Cloud Services, which are comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services for customer IT infrastructure for a fee for a stated term that we manage, host and support.are hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers or physically on-premise at customer facilities.
The software license updates and product support line of business generates revenues through the sale of software support contracts related to new software licenses purchased by our customers. The software license updates and product support line of business provides our on-premise software customers with rights to software product upgrades and maintenance releases, patches released, internet access to technical content, as well as internet and telephone access to technical support personnel during the support period.
The hardware systems products line of business consists primarily ofprovides Oracle Engineered Systems, servers, storage, networking, industry-specific hardware, virtualization software, operating systems including the Oracle Solaris Operating System and management software to support diverse IT environments, including public and private cloud computing environments. As a part of this line of business, we offer our Oracle Engineered Systems, including Oracle Exadata Database Machine, Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud, Oracle Exalytics In-Memory Machine, Oracle SPARC SuperCluster, Oracle Database Appliance, and Oracle Big Data Appliance, which are the core building blocks for Oracle’s data center and cloud computing products and services.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
Our hardware systems support line of business provides customers with software updates for the software components that are essential to the functionality of our server and storagehardware products, such as Oracle Solaris and certain other software products, and can include product repairs, maintenance services and technical support services.
Our services business is comprised of the remainder of our operating segments and offers consulting, managed cloudadvanced customer support services and education services. Our consulting line of business primarily provides services to customers in business and IT strategy alignment, enterprise architecture planning and design, initial product implementation and integration and ongoing product enhancements and upgrades. Oracle managed cloud services provide comprehensive software and hardware management and maintenance services including deployment, management, monitoring, patching, security and upgrade services for customers hosted at our Oracle data center facilities, select partner data centers, or physically on-premise atAdvanced customer facilities. Additionally, we providesupport provides support services, both on-premise and remote, to our customers to enable increased performance and higher availability of their products and services and also includes certain other services. Education services provide training to customers, partners and employees as a part of our mission of accelerating the adoption and use of our cloud, on-premise software and hardware products and to create opportunities to grow our product revenues.offerings.
We do not track our assets by operating segments. Consequently, it is not practical to show assets by operating segment.
Certain costs have been reclassified in the fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 periods presented to align with our current line of business management structure.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
The following table presents summary results for each of our three businesses and for the operating segments of our cloud and on-premise software and hardware systems businesses:
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software and on-premise software: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 10,350 | $ | 9,910 | $ | 9,220 | $ | 9,488 | $ | 10,025 | $ | 10,542 | ||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service expenses | 1,116 | 742 | 437 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and distribution expenses | 6,010 | 5,812 | 5,666 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 2,362 | $ | 3,471 | $ | 4,439 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 646 | $ | 608 | $ | 456 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cloud infrastructure as a service expenses | 352 | 329 | 304 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and distribution expenses | 5,536 | 5,198 | 4,746 | 74 | 89 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 4,814 | $ | 4,712 | $ | 4,474 | $ | 220 | $ | 190 | $ | 91 | ||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 17,156 | $ | 16,258 | $ | 14,876 | $ | 18,863 | $ | 18,858 | $ | 18,209 | ||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support expenses | 1,080 | 1,116 | 1,144 | 1,077 | 1,130 | 1,111 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 16,076 | $ | 15,142 | $ | 13,732 | $ | 17,786 | $ | 17,728 | $ | 17,098 | ||||||||||||
Total software business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cloud and on-premise software business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 27,506 | $ | 26,168 | $ | 24,096 | $ | 28,997 | $ | 29,491 | $ | 29,207 | ||||||||||||
Expenses | 6,616 | 6,314 | 5,890 | 8,629 | 8,102 | 7,579 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 20,890 | $ | 19,854 | $ | 18,206 | $ | 20,368 | $ | 21,389 | $ | 21,628 | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems products: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 3,033 | $ | 3,827 | $ | 4,382 | $ | 2,471 | $ | 2,825 | $ | 2,976 | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems products expenses | 1,498 | 1,841 | 2,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware products expenses | 1,364 | 1,465 | 1,516 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and distribution expenses | 885 | 1,050 | 960 | 850 | 864 | 940 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 650 | $ | 936 | $ | 1,361 | $ | 257 | $ | 496 | $ | 520 | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems support: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 2,327 | $ | 2,505 | $ | 2,710 | $ | 2,198 | $ | 2,384 | $ | 2,407 | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems support expenses | 857 | 1,006 | 1,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support expenses | 665 | 783 | 802 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 1,470 | $ | 1,499 | $ | 1,489 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,601 | $ | 1,605 | ||||||||||||
Total hardware systems business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hardware business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 5,360 | $ | 6,332 | $ | 7,092 | $ | 4,669 | $ | 5,209 | $ | 5,383 | ||||||||||||
Expenses | 3,240 | 3,897 | 4,242 | 2,879 | 3,112 | 3,258 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 2,120 | $ | 2,435 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 1,790 | $ | 2,097 | $ | 2,125 | ||||||||||||
Total services business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 4,387 | $ | 4,721 | $ | 4,662 | $ | 3,391 | $ | 3,553 | $ | 3,716 | ||||||||||||
Services expenses | 3,416 | 3,605 | 3,674 | 2,645 | 2,818 | 2,822 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 971 | $ | 1,116 | $ | 988 | $ | 746 | $ | 735 | $ | 894 | ||||||||||||
Totals: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 37,253 | $ | 37,221 | $ | 35,850 | $ | 37,057 | $ | 38,253 | $ | 38,306 | ||||||||||||
Expenses | 13,272 | 13,816 | 13,806 | 14,153 | 14,032 | 13,659 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Margin(2) | $ | 23,981 | $ | 23,405 | $ | 22,044 | $ | 22,904 | $ | 24,221 | $ | 24,647 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
|
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
| segment revenues to our total |
| (2) | The margins reported reflect only the direct controllable costs of each line of business and do not include allocations of product development, marketing and partner programs, and corporate, general and administrative and |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2013
The following table reconciles total operating segment revenues to total revenues as well as total operating segment margin to income before provision for income taxes:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues for operating segments | $ | 37,253 | $ | 37,221 | $ | 35,850 | $ | 37,057 | $ | 38,253 | $ | 38,306 | ||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues(1) | (45 | ) | (22 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service revenues(1) | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support revenues(1) | (14 | ) | (48 | ) | (80 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems support revenues(1) | (14 | ) | (30 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support revenues(1) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 37,180 | $ | 37,121 | $ | 35,622 | $ | 37,047 | $ | 38,226 | $ | 38,275 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total margin for operating segments | $ | 23,981 | $ | 23,405 | $ | 22,044 | $ | 22,904 | $ | 24,221 | $ | 24,647 | ||||||||||||
New software licenses and cloud software subscriptions revenues(1) | (45 | ) | (22 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Cloud software as a service and platform as a service revenues(1) | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Software license updates and product support revenues(1) | (14 | ) | (48 | ) | (80 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Hardware systems support revenues(1) | (14 | ) | (30 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardware support revenues(1) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Product development | (4,321 | ) | (4,050 | ) | (4,089 | ) | (4,978 | ) | (4,812 | ) | (4,590 | ) | ||||||||||||
Marketing and partner program expenses | (591 | ) | (581 | ) | (601 | ) | (505 | ) | (520 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate, general and administrative and information technology expenses | (1,417 | ) | (1,491 | ) | (1,404 | ) | (1,635 | ) | (1,496 | ) | (1,384 | ) | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | (2,385 | ) | (2,430 | ) | (2,428 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (2,149 | ) | (2,300 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other | 604 | (56 | ) | (208 | ) | (42 | ) | (211 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||
Restructuring | (352 | ) | (295 | ) | (487 | ) | (458 | ) | (207 | ) | (183 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | (722 | ) | (626 | ) | (500 | ) | (1,034 | ) | (928 | ) | (795 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (797 | ) | (766 | ) | (808 | ) | (1,467 | ) | (1,143 | ) | (914 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other, net | (29 | ) | (48 | ) | 120 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense), net | 305 | 106 | (141 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | $ | 13,898 | $ | 12,962 | $ | 11,411 | $ | 11,442 | $ | 12,834 | $ | 13,704 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Geographic Information
Disclosed in the table below is geographic information for each country that comprised greater than three percent of our total revenues for any of fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.
| As of and for the Year Ended May 31, | As of and for the Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Revenues | Long Lived Assets(1) | Revenues | Long Lived Assets(1) | Revenues | Long Lived Assets(1) | Revenues | Long-Lived Assets(1) | Revenues | Long-Lived Assets(1) | Revenues | Long-Lived Assets(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 16,003 | $ | 2,921 | $ | 15,767 | $ | 2,468 | $ | 15,274 | $ | 2,359 | $ | 17,264 | $ | 3,646 | $ | 17,325 | $ | 3,341 | $ | 16,809 | $ | 2,993 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 2,165 | 203 | 2,302 | 171 | 2,200 | 168 | 2,349 | 334 | 2,388 | 309 | 2,309 | 236 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan | 1,770 | 428 | 1,865 | 550 | 1,731 | 551 | 1,465 | 375 | 1,433 | 338 | 1,558 | 414 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany | 1,308 | 44 | 1,484 | 47 | 1,475 | 29 | 1,438 | 40 | 1,466 | 33 | 1,483 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada | 1,232 | 34 | 1,234 | 37 | 1,174 | 16 | 1,096 | 44 | 1,286 | 58 | 1,190 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australia | 1,084 | 54 | 1,163 | 38 | 1,041 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France | 1,054 | 17 | 1,162 | 16 | 1,145 | 15 | 1,039 | 26 | 1,044 | 33 | 1,148 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other countries | 12,564 | 814 | 12,144 | 741 | 11,582 | 661 | 12,396 | 963 | 13,284 | 1,007 | 13,778 | 879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 37,180 | $ | 4,515 | $ | 37,121 | $ | 4,068 | $ | 35,622 | $ | 3,833 | $ | 37,047 | $ | 5,428 | $ | 38,226 | $ | 5,119 | $ | 38,275 | $ | 4,616 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Long-lived assets exclude goodwill, intangible assets, equity investments and deferred taxes, which are not allocated to specific geographic locations as it is impracticable to do so. |
| 17. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted averageweighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted averageweighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, restricted stock-based awards, stock options, and shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| Year Ended May 31, | Year Ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,925 | $ | 9,981 | $ | 8,547 | $ | 8,901 | $ | 9,938 | $ | 10,955 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 4,769 | 5,015 | 5,048 | 4,221 | 4,404 | 4,528 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans | 75 | 80 | 80 | 84 | 99 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding | 4,844 | 5,095 | 5,128 | 4,305 | 4,503 | 4,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 2.29 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 2.42 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.26 | $ | 1.96 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 2.07 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.38 | ||||||||||||
Shares subject to anti-dilutive stock options and restricted stock-based awards excluded from calculation(1) | 208 | 110 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares subject to anti-dilutive restricted stock-based awards and stock options excluded from calculation(1) | 63 | 37 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | These weighted shares relate to anti-dilutive |
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
| 18. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
SAP Intellectual Property Litigation
On March 22, 2007, Oracle Corporation, Oracle USA, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation (collectively, Oracle) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against SAP AG, its wholly-owned subsidiary, SAP America, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, TomorrowNow, Inc., (the SAP Subsidiary, and collectively, the SAP Defendants) alleging that SAP unlawfully accessed Oracle’s Customer Connection support website and improperly took and used Oracle’s intellectual property.
Trial commenced on November 1, 2010 on the issue of damages, as SAP had stipulated to liability. The jury awarded Oracle $1.3 billion. On September 1, 2011, the court granted the SAP Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. The court vacated the $1.3 billion award and held that Oracle could either accept a reduced amount or remittitur of $272 million or proceed to a new trial. On February 6, 2012, Oracle rejected the remittitur and requested a new trial.
On August 2, 2012, Oracle and the SAP Defendants stipulated to a judgment of $306 million against the SAP Defendants, in lieu of having a second jury trial, while preserving both parties’ rights to appeal prior court orders. We recorded a $306 million non-current receivable, included in other assets, in our consolidated balance sheet and we recognized a corresponding benefit to our results of operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Previously during trial we received payment of $120 million in attorneys’ fees from SAP under a stipulation, and we recorded this payment upon receipt as a benefit to our results of operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. On August 3, 2012, the court entered the judgment and vacated the date set for the new trial. Oracle filed a Notice of Appeal on August 31, 2012, and the SAP Defendants filed a notice of appeal on September 14, 2012. The SAP Defendants subsequently dismissed their appeal. Oracle’s appeal has been fully briefed. The appellate court has not yet scheduled a date for oral argument.
Hewlett-Packard Company Litigation
On June 15, 2011, Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”)(HP) filed a complaint in the California Superior Court, County of Santa Clara against Oracle Corporation alleging numerous causes of action including breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, defamation, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and violation of the California Unfair Business Practices Act. The original plaintiff, Hewlett Packard Company, is now Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. The complaint alleged that when Oracle announced on March 22 and 23, 2011 that it would no longer develop future versions of its software to run on HP’s Itanium-based servers, it breached a settlement agreement signed on September 20, 2010 between HP and Mark Hurd (the “HurdHurd Settlement Agreement”)Agreement), who was both HP’s former chief executive officer and chairman of HP’s board of directors. HP sought a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights and obligations under the Hurd Settlement Agreement, and other equitable and monetary relief.
Oracle answered the complaint and filed a cross-complaint, which was amended on December 2, 2011. The amended cross-complaint alleged claims including violation of the Lanham Act. Oracle alleged that HP had secretly agreed to pay Intel to continue to develop and manufacture the Itanium microprocessor, and had misrepresented to customers that the Itanium microprocessor had a long roadmap, among other claims. Oracle sought equitable rescission of the Hurd Settlement Agreement, and other equitable and monetary relief.
The court bifurcated the trial and tried HP’s causes of action for declaratory relief and promissory estoppel without a jury in June 2012. The court issued a final statement of decision on August 28, 2012, finding that the Hurd Settlement Agreement required Oracle to continue to develop certain of its software products for use on HP’s Itanium-based servers and to port such products at no cost to HP for as long as HP sells those servers. Oracle has announced that it is appealing this decision. The issues of breach, HP’s performance, causation and damages, HP’s tort claims, and Oracle’s cross-claims will all be tried before a jury. As of April 8, 2013, the trial iswas stayed pending Oracle’s appeal of the court’s denial of its anti-SLAPP motion. On August 27, 2015, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s denial of Oracle’s anti-SLAPP motion. The Court of Appeal’s decision became final on September 26, 2015. The matter was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and trial, which began on May 23, 2016. While we believe that we have meritorious defenses against this action, and we will continue to vigorously defend it, we cannot currently estimate a reasonably possible range of loss for this action due to the complexities and uncertainty surrounding the judicial process and the nature of the claims.
State of Oregon Litigation
On August 22, 2014, the Attorney General for the State of Oregon, the State of Oregon, and the Oregon Health Insurance Exchange Corporation, doing business as Cover Oregon (Cover Oregon), filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Marion against Oracle, our then-President and Chief Financial Officer, three current and two former Oracle employees, and Mythics, Inc. The complaint alleges claims related to the work Oracle performed on Oregon’s healthcare exchange website and Oregon’s system for delivering health and human services to low-income residents. Thereafter, Cover Oregon was dissolved, and the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services (the DCBS) continued to assert Cover Oregon’s claims. Also, one of the former Oracle employees was dismissed from the lawsuit. A First Amended Complaint was filed on August 10, 2015.
The complaint alleges claims against Oracle for fraud, violations of Oregon’s False Claims Act, breach of contract, and violations of the Oregon Civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and alleges a violation of Oregon’s False Claims Act against each of the individuals. The complaint seeks monetary damages, statutory penalties, attorneys’ fees and costs, and a permanent injunction prohibiting Oracle from marketing to or entering into a contract with any public corporation or agency of the State of Oregon. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Oracle committed fraud by making false statements about the capabilities and functionality of its products and about the amount of time and effort it would take Oracle’s consulting and managed cloud services operations to perform the requested work. It also alleges that Oracle breached the contracts by failing to provide
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 2016
what was required under the contracts and failing to perform the services in a professional manner consistent with industry standards. The complaint alleges that Oracle violated Oregon’s False Claims Act by making false statements in order to obtain payment of invoices and by presenting invoices for payment that were false. The claims for violation of Oregon’s Civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act allege that Oracle violated the statute by making false statements in writing about the capabilities of Oracle’s products and the functionality and readiness of the healthcare exchange website, by using those false statements to obtain the signatures necessary to secure the contracts, execute documents, and enable payment, and by using the wires to transmit documents containing the allegedly false statements. On May 16, 2016, the State of Oregon filed a motion seeking to amend its complaint to add a demand for punitive damages against Oracle for the claims alleging fraud and violations of the Oregon Civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
The claims against the individuals allege that one former employee violated Oregon’s False Claims Act by making false statements that fraudulently induced the State of Oregon to enter into its contracts with Oracle, and that the other four employees violated the statute by making false statements in order to get invoices paid.
Oracle responded to the original complaint on December 2, 2014, and filed a response to the First Amended Complaint on August 20, 2015. Oracle denied all claims and allegations and filed counterclaims against the DCBS for breach of contract,quantum meruit (a claim requesting payment for the value of services provided), and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court granted the State of Oregon’s motion to dismiss Oracle’s claims for breach of contract and the breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On October 26, 2015, Oracle filed its amended response to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and alleged counterclaims against the DCBS for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of implied-in-fact contract,quantum meruit, and promissory estoppel (a claim seeking to enforce promises that Oracle relied upon in providing services). The State of Oregon filed a motion to dismiss all counterclaims except the causes of action forquantum meruit and promissory estoppel, and on February 5, 2016 the court granted that motion and dismissed with prejudice Oracle’s claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and breach of implied-in-fact contract. Oracle seeks monetary damages to compensate it for the value of unpaid services and its attorneys’ fees and costs. Trial is set to begin on January 10, 2017. We cannot currently estimate a reasonably possible range of loss for this action. We believe that we have meritorious defenses against this action, and we will continue to vigorously defend it.
On August 8, 2014, Oracle filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, for the District of Oregon in Portland against Cover Oregon. The complaint alleged claims for breach of contract andquantum meruitand sought monetary damages to compensate Oracle for the value of unpaid services. On September 8, 2014, Oracle filed a First Amended Complaint adding two State of Oregon agencies as defendants and adding causes of action for copyright infringement and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On January 27, 2015, Oracle filed a Second Amended Complaint. Cover Oregon, now the DCBS, is a defendant as to all causes of action; the other state agencies are defendants to the cause of action for copyright infringement. In addition to monetary damages, Oracle seeks an injunction prohibiting infringement of its copyrights. All defendants moved for judgment in their favor, claiming that the state entities have sovereign immunity (that is, they cannot be sued in federal court). On November 18, 2015, the court ruled on the motions, holding that two state agencies (Oregon Health Authority and Oregon Department of Human Services) do not have sovereign immunity, but that the DCBS does have sovereign immunity. On December 9 and 17, 2015, Oracle and the Oregon parties each filed notices of appeal from that decision. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has coordinated the two matters, and briefing will begin in late April 2016.
On November 12, 2015, Oracle filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Marion against Oregon’s Governor, Kate Brown, in her official capacity. Oracle filed a First Amended Complaint on January 15, 2016. In this lawsuit, Oracle alleges violations of Oregon’s Public Records Law and seeks a court order declaring that Governor Brown has violated Oregon’s Public Records Law and compelling compliance with that law. The Governor has moved to dismiss the complaint.
ORACLE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
May 31, 20132016
Derivative LitigationsOn January 21, 2016, Oracle filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Marion against the State of Oregon, by and Related Action
Various stockholder derivative lawsuits have been filed againstthrough Governor Kate Brown, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, and three state agencies. In this lawsuit, Oracle seeks to enforce an October 2015 oral agreement to resolve all pending litigation between Oracle and certain formerthe State of Oregon. The State of Oregon moved to dismiss the complaint, and current directors in connection withon April 28, 2016 that motion was denied. Oracle filed a qui tam lawsuit that had beenFirst Amended Complaint on June 13, 2016, and Mythics, Inc. was added as a plaintiff.
On March 8, 2016, Oracle filed against Oraclea Complaint for a Writ of Mandamus in the United StatesU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The qui tam action allegedColumbia against Sylvia Burwell, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity. In this lawsuit, Oracle alleges that, Oracle made false statementsas to the General Services Administration (GSA) in 1997-1998 while negotiating its GSA contract, among other claims. Oracle settled this action without admitting liability,State of Oregon and the case was dismissed on October 11, 2011. Thereafter,Oregon Health Insurance Exchange, the following stockholder derivative actions have been filed, claimingSecretary failed to exercise her mandatory oversight duties under the Affordable Care Act to monitor the integrity and performance of states and state health insurance exchanges that receive federal funds. Oracle seeks an order requiring the named officerSecretary to exercise that mandatory duty and director defendants were responsible for certain alleged conduct in(1) direct the qui tam action and thereby exposing OracleState of Oregon to reputational damage, monetary damages and costs and asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and unjust enrichment: on August 2, 2010, a stockholder derivativestay or dismiss its lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; on August 19, 2010, a similar stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in California Superior Court, County of San Mateo; and on September 8, 2011, another stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The first two derivative actions were consolidated, but pursuant to a motion by Oracle, they were dismissed on November 11, 2011, with leave to plaintiffs to amend. No amended complaint has been filed.
On September 12, 2011, two alleged stockholders of Oracle filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate for Inspection of Corporate Books and Records in California Superior Court, County of San Mateo. The petition originally named as respondentsagainst Oracle, and two of our officers, both of whom were subsequently dismissed. The alleged stockholders claim that they are investigating alleged corporate mismanagement relating(2) monitor and investigate all work Oregon and its subgrantees and contractors, including Oracle, did on the health insurance exchange project to the claims in the qui tam action, and asked the court to compel the inspection of certain of Oracle’s accounting books and records and minutes of meetings of the stockholders, our Board of Directors and the committees of our Board of Directors, related to those allegations, plus expenses of the audit and attorneys’ fees. At a hearing on November 10, 2011, the court granted the alleged stockholders’ request for a Writ of Mandate, which was confirmed in a judgment on December 12, 2011. Oracle filed a notice of appeal on February 2, 2012.
The parties in the derivative and Writ of Mandate actions discussed abovedetermine what liabilities involving federal funds, if any, have reached a tentative settlement of these actions, under which Oracle will continue or implement certain corporate governance measures, which shall remain in place for three years, and Oracle will pay, or cause Oracle’s insurers to pay, plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs up to $1.9 million. The settlement is subject to court approval, and a hearing on whether the court will approve the settlement is scheduled for July 11, 2013.
On September 30, 2011, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery and a second stockholder was permitted to intervene as a plaintiff on November 15, 2011. At an August 22, 2012, hearing, the court dismissed certain claims but permitted certain claims for breach of fiduciary duty to proceed. On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The derivative suit is brought by two alleged stockholders of Oracle, purportedly on Oracle’s behalf, against one former director and all but two of our current directors, including against our Chief Executive Officer as an alleged controlling stockholder. Plaintiffs allege that Oracle’s directors breached their fiduciary duties in agreeing to purchase Pillar Data Systems, Inc. at an excessive price. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, rescission of the Pillar Data transaction, damages, disgorgement of our Chief Executive Officer’s alleged profits, disgorgement of all compensation earned by defendants as a result of their service on Oracle’s Board or any committee of the Board, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties currently are finishing fact discovery, and are conducting expert discovery.
While the outcome of the derivative litigations and the related action noted above cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will result in losses that are materially in excess of amounts already recognized, if any.arisen from it.
Other Litigation
We are party to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings and claims that relate to acquisitions we have completed or to companies we have acquired or are attempting to acquire. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will result in losses that are materially in excess of amounts already recognized, if any.
ORACLE CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in millions) | Beginnning Balance | Additions Charged to Operations or Other Accounts | Write-offs | Translation Adjustments and Other | Ending Balance | Beginning Balance | Additions Charged to Operations or Other Accounts | Write-offs | Translation Adjustments and Other | Ending Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowances for Doubtful Trade Receivables | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2011 | $ | 305 | $ | 164 | $ | (113 | ) | $ | 16 | $ | 372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2014 | $ | 296 | $ | 122 | $ | (120 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | 306 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2012 | $ | 372 | $ | 92 | $ | (107 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2015 | $ | 306 | $ | 56 | $ | (86 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | 285 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2013 | $ | 323 | $ | 118 | $ | (167 | ) | $ | 22 | $ | 296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2016 | $ | 285 | $ | 130 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 327 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ORACLE CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: June | By: | / | ||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||||
| (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) | ||||||
| Date: June 22, 2016 | By: | /S/ MARK V. HURD | ||||
| Mark V. Hurd | ||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Name | Title | Date | ||
/
| Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) | June 22, 2016 | ||
/S/ MARK V. HURD Mark V. Hurd | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | June | ||
/
| ||||
/ William Corey West | June | |||
/
| Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Technology Officer and Director | June | ||
/ Jeffrey O. Henley | Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director | June 22, 2016 | ||
/S/ JEFFREY S. BERG Jeffrey S. Berg | Director | June | ||
/ H. Raymond Bingham | Director | June | ||
/ Michael J. Boskin | Director | June | ||
/ Bruce R. Chizen | Director | June | ||
/ George H. Conrades | Director | June | ||
/ Hector Garcia-Molina | Director | June | ||
/
| Director | June | ||
/ Leon E. Panetta | Director | June 22, 2016 | ||
/S/ NAOMI O. SELIGMAN Naomi O. Seligman | Director | June | ||
ORACLE CORPORATION
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
| Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | Exhibit Description | Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||||||||
Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | Filed By | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | Filed By | |||||||||||||||||
| 3.01 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oracle Corporation and Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oracle Corporation | 8-K 12G3 | 000-51788 | 3.1 | 2/6/06 | Oracle Corporation | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oracle Corporation and Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oracle Corporation | 8-K 12G3 | 000-51788 | 3.01 | 2/6/06 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 3.02 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Oracle Corporation | 8-K | 000-51788 | 3.02 | 7/14/06 | Oracle Corporation | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Oracle Corporation | 8-K | 001-35992 | 3.02 | 6/16/16 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.01 | Specimen Certificate of Registrant’s Common Stock | S-3 ASR | 333-166643 | 4.04 | 5/7/10 | Oracle Corporation | Specimen Certificate of Registrant’s Common Stock | S-3 ASR | 333-166643 | 4.04 | 5/7/10 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.02 | Indenture dated January 13, 2006, among Ozark Holding Inc., Oracle Corporation and Citibank, N.A. | 8-K | 000-14376 | 10.34 | 1/20/06 | Oracle Systems Corporation | Indenture dated January 13, 2006, among Ozark Holding Inc., Oracle Corporation and Citibank, N.A. | 8-K | 000-14376 | 10.34 | 1/20/06 | Oracle Systems Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.03 | Form of Old 2016 Note, together with the Officers’ Certificate issued January 13, 2006 pursuant to the Indenture dated January 13, 2006, among Oracle Corporation (formerly known as Ozark Holding Inc.) and Citibank, N.A. | 8-K | 000-14376 | 10.35 | 1/20/06 | Oracle Systems Corporation | Form of Old 2016 Note, together with the Officers’ Certificate issued January 13, 2006 pursuant to the Indenture dated January 13, 2006, among Oracle Corporation (formerly known as Ozark Holding Inc.) and Citibank, N.A. | 8-K | 000-14376 | 10.35 | 1/20/06 | Oracle Systems Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.04 | Form of New 5.25% Note due 2016 | S-4/A | 333-132250 | 4.4 | 4/14/06 | Oracle Corporation | Form of New 5.25% Note due 2016 | S-4/A | 333-132250 | 4.4 | 4/14/06 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.05 | First Supplemental Indenture dated May 9, 2007 among Oracle Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. | S-3 ASR | 333-142796 | 4.3 | 5/10/07 | Oracle Corporation | First Supplemental Indenture dated May 9, 2007 among Oracle Corporation, Citibank, N.A. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. | S-3 ASR | 333-142796 | 4.3 | 5/10/07 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.06 | Forms of 4.95% Note due 2013, 5.75% Note due 2018 and 6.50% Note due 2038, together with Officers’ Certificate issued April 9, 2008 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.09 | 4/8/08 | Oracle Corporation | Forms of 5.75% Note due 2018 and 6.50% Note due 2038, together with Officers’ Certificate issued April 9, 2008 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.09 | 4/8/08 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.07 | Forms of 3.75% Note due 2014, 5.00% Note due 2019 and 6.125% Note due 2039, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 8, 2009 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.08 | 7/8/09 | Oracle Corporation | Forms of 5.00% Note due 2019 and 6.125% Note due 2039, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 8, 2009 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.08 | 7/8/09 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.08 | Forms of Original 2020 Note and Original 2040 Note, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 19, 2010 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 10-Q | 000-51788 | 4.08 | 9/20/10 | Oracle Corporation | Forms of Original 2020 Note and Original 2040 Note, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 19, 2010 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 10-Q | 000-51788 | 4.08 | 9/20/10 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.09 | Forms of New 2020 Note and New 2040 Note | S-4 | 333-176405 | 4.5 | 8/19/11 | Oracle Corporation | Forms of New 2020 Note and New 2040 Note | S-4 | 333-176405 | 4.5 | 8/19/11 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 4.10 | Forms of 1.20% Note due 2017 and 2.50% Note due 2022, together with Officers’ Certificate issued October 25, 2012 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.10 | 10/25/12 | Oracle Corporation | Forms of 1.20% Note due 2017 and 2.50% Note due 2022, together with Officers’ Certificate issued October 25, 2012 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 000-51788 | 4.10 | 10/25/12 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| 10.01* | Oracle Corporation 1993 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 | 10-Q | 000-51788 | 10.01 | 3/23/09 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
4.11 | Forms of 2.25% Note due 2021 and 3.125% Note due 2025, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 10, 2013 setting forth the terms of the Notes | 8-K | 001-35992 | 4.11 | 7/10/13 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference Filed Herewith Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed By Exhibit Exhibit Description 4.12 4.13 4.14 10.01* 10.02* 10.03*‡ 10.04* 10.05* 10.06* 10.07* 10.08* 10.09* 10.10* 10.11*Exhibit
No. 10.02* Oracle Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1992), as amended and restated as of October 1, 2009 10-K 000-51788 10.02 7/1/10 Oracle Corporation 10.03* Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan, as amended and restated on November 7, 2012 10-Q 000-51788 10.03 12/21/12 Oracle Corporation 10.04* Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as approved on October 6, 2010 8-K 000-51788 10.30 10/13/10 Oracle Corporation 10.05* Form of Stock Option Agreements under the Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan for U.S. Executive Vice Presidents and Section 16 Officers 10-Q 000-51788 10.05 12/23/11 Oracle Corporation 10.06* Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan 10-Q 000-51788 10.06 12/23/11 Oracle Corporation 10.07* Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Executive Officers 10-Q 000-51788 10.07 12/23/11 Oracle Corporation 10.08 Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement relating to the $3,000,000,000 Commercial Paper Program 8-K 000-51788 10.2 2/9/06 Oracle Corporation 10.09 Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement between Oracle Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association dated as of April 23, 2013 8-K 000-51788 10.09 4/26/13 Oracle Corporation 10.10* Offer letter dated February 2, 2010 to John Fowler and employment agreement dated February 2, 2010 10-Q 000-51788 10.26 3/29/10 Oracle Corporation 10.11* Offer letter dated September 2, 2010 to Mark V. Hurd and employment agreement dated September 3, 2010 8-K 000-51788 10.28 9/8/10 Oracle Corporation 10.12* Oracle Corporation Executive Bonus Plan 8-K 000-51788 10.29 10/13/10 Oracle Corporation 10.13* Sun Microsystems, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan 10-Q 000-15086 10.1 2/6/08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 10.14 $3,000,000,000 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 22, 2013 among Oracle Corporation and the lenders and agents named therein 8-K 000-51788 10.14 4/26/13 Oracle Corporation 12.01 Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges X 21.01 Subsidiaries of the Registrant X 23.01 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm X 31.01 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer X 31.02 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer X
No. Incorporated by Reference Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Filed By Forms of Floating-Rate Note due 2019, 2.375% Note due 2019 and 3.625% Note due 2023, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 16, 2013 setting forth the terms of the Notes 8-K 001-35992 4.12 7/16/13 Oracle Corporation Forms of Floating-Rate Note due 2017, Floating-Rate Note due 2019, 2.25% Note due 2019, 2.80% Note due 2021, 3.40% Note due 2024, 4.30% Note due 2034 and 4.50% Note due 2044, together with Officers’ Certificate issued July 8, 2014 setting forth the terms of the Notes 8-K 001-35992 4.13 7/8/14 Oracle Corporation Forms of 2.50% Notes due 2022, 2.95% Notes due 2025, 3.25% Notes due 2030, 3.90% Notes due 2035, 4.125% Notes due 2045 and 4.375% Notes due 2055, together with Officers’ Certificate issued May 5, 2015 setting forth the terms of the Notes 8-K 001-35992 4.13 5/5/15 Oracle Corporation Oracle Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of July 1, 2015 10-Q 001-35992 10.01 9/18/15 Oracle Corporation Oracle Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1992), as amended and restated as of October 1, 2009 10-K 000-51788 10.02 7/1/10 Oracle Corporation Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan, as amended and restated on April 29, 2016 Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as approved on October 31, 2013 10-Q 001-35992 10.04 12/20/13 Oracle Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan for U.S. Executive Vice Presidents and Section 16 Officers 10-Q 000-51788 10.05 12/23/11 Oracle Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan 10-K 001-35992 10.06 06/25/15 Oracle Corporation Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Executive Officers 10-Q 000-51788 10.07 12/23/11 Oracle Corporation Offer letter dated February 2, 2010 to John Fowler and employment agreement dated February 2, 2010 10-Q 000-51788 10.26 3/29/10 Oracle Corporation Offer letter dated September 2, 2010 to Mark V. Hurd and employment agreement dated September 3, 2010 8-K 000-51788 10.28 9/8/10 Oracle Corporation Oracle Corporation Executive Bonus Plan 8-K 000-51788 10.29 10/13/10 Oracle Corporation Sun Microsystems, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan 10-Q 000-15086 10.1 2/6/08 Sun Microsystems,
Inc.
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Exhibit | Exhibit Description | Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||
| Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | Filed By | ||||||||
10.12 | $3,000,000,000 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 22, 2013 among Oracle Corporation and the lenders and agents named therein | 8-K | 000-51788 | 10.14 | 4/26/13 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||
10.13* | Oracle Corporation Stock Unit Award Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of July 1, 2015 | 10-Q | 001-35992 | 10.15 | 9/18/15 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||
10.14* | Form of Performance-Based Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2000 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan for Section 16 Officers | 10-Q | 001-35992 | 10.16 | 9/23/14 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||
10.15* | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Oracle Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Directors’ Stock Plan | 10-K | 001-35992 | 10.17 | 06/25/15 | Oracle Corporation | ||||||
12.01‡ | Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges | |||||||||||
21.01‡ | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | |||||||||||
23.01‡ | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |||||||||||
31.01‡ | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | |||||||||||
31.02‡ | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer | |||||||||||
32.01† | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officer | |||||||||||
101‡ | Interactive Data Files Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2016 and 2015, (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (4) Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (6) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and (7) Financial Statement Schedule II | |||||||||||
| * | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or |
| ‡ | Filed herewith. |
| † | Furnished herewith. |
125140