Delaware | | | | Delaware | | 13-4996950 | (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
500 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, N.J. 08628 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (609) 806-1200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | | | Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered | Common Stock, $1 par value | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x☒ No ¨☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨☐ No x☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x☒ No ¨☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes ¨ No x☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Large accelerated filer | ☒ | | Accelerated filer | ☐ | | Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x☒ The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 28, 201330, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $8.5$13.0 billion. For purposes of making this calculation only, the registrant included all directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of the common stock (the “Common Stock”) of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (the “Company”). The aggregate market value is based on the closing price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2013.30, 2016. As of February 18, 2014,21, 2017, there were 137,191,728254,632,798 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Documents Incorporated by Reference Certain provisions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30, 20142017 are incorporated by reference in Items 10 through 14 of ItemPart III of this Annual Report on Form10-K 10‑K (this “Annual Report”).
CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, including, among others, statements relating to net sales and earnings growth; gross margin changes; trade and marketing spending; marketing expense as a percentage of net sales; sufficiency of cash flows from operations; earnings per share; the impact of new accounting pronouncements; cost savings programs; consumer demand and spending; the effects of competition; the effect of product mix; volume growth, including the effects of new product launches into new and existing categories; the impact of competitive laundry detergent products, including unit dose laundry detergent; impairment of an affiliated company; consumer demand and spending; the effects of competition; earnings per share; gross margin changes; trade and marketing spending; marketing expense as a percentage of net sales; cost savings programs; the Company’s hedge programs; the impact of foreign exchange and commodity price fluctuations; actual voluntary and expected cash contributions to pension plans; impairments and other charges including the pension settlement charge and asset impairment charges; the Company’s share repurchase programs;investments in joint ventures; the impact of acquisitions;acquisitions and divestitures; capital expenditures; the sales impact related to the Company’s information systems upgrade; the effective tax rate; the impact of tax audits; tax changes and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations; facility restructuring charges; the impact of trade name impairment charges; environmental and regulatory matters; availability of raw materials; the effect of the credit environment on the Company’s liquidity and capital expenditures;resources; the Company’s fixed rate debt; compliance with the minimum interest coverage ratio requirement and the maximum leverage ratio requirementcovenants under the Credit Agreement;Company’s debt instruments; the Company’s commercial paper program; sufficiency of cash flows from operations; the Company’s current and anticipated future borrowing capacity to meet capital expenditure program costs; and the Company’s share repurchase programs; payment of dividends; actual voluntaryenvironmental and expected cash contributions to pension plans; investments inregulatory matters; and the Natronx Technologies, LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture;availability and adequacy of raw materials, including trona reserves. These statements represent the intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs of the Company, and are based on assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable but may prove to be incorrect. In addition, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control and could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Factors that mightcould cause such differences include a decline in market growth, retailer distribution and consumer demand (as a result of, among other things, political, economic and marketplace conditions and events); unanticipated increases in raw material and energy prices; delays or other problems in manufacturing or distribution; adverse developments affecting the financial condition of major customers and suppliers; competition, including the entrance of The Procter & Gamble CompanyCompany’s (“P&G”) participation in the value laundry detergent category and Henkel AG & Co. KGaA’s (“Henkel”) entry into the valueU.S. premium laundry detergent category; Henkel’s acquisition of the Sun Products Co., Inc. (“Sun Products”); changes in marketing and promotional spending; growth or declines in various product categories and the impact of customer actions in response to changes in consumer demand and the economy, including increasing shelf space of private label products; consumer and competitor reaction to, and customer acceptance of, new product introductions and features; the Company’s ability to maintain product quality and characteristics at a level acceptable to our customers and consumers; disruptions in the banking system and financial markets; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; implications of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union; transition to, and shifting trade or economic policies under the new presidential administration in the United States; issues relating to the Company’s information technology and controls; the impact of natural disasters on the Company and its customers and suppliers, including third party information technology service providers; the acquisition or divestiture of assets; the outcome of contingencies, including litigation, pending regulatory proceedings and environmental matters; and changes in the regulatory environment. For a description of additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements, please see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by the United States federal securities laws. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures the Company makes on related subjects in its filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). All applicable amounts in the consolidated financial statements and related disclosure included in this annual report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Company’s two for one stock split effected September 1, 2016. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PART II PART III
PARTPART I
GENERAL The Company, founded in 1846, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of household, personal care and specialty products. The Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brands through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company also sells specialty products to industrial customers and distributors. The Company focuses its consumer products marketing efforts principally on its nineten “power brands.” These well-recognized brand names include ARM & HAMMER, (usedused in multiple product categories such as baking soda, cat litter, carpet deodorization and laundry detergent),detergent; TROJAN condoms, lubricants and vibrators,vibrators; OXICLEAN stain removers, cleaning solutions, laundry detergents, dishwashing detergent and bleach alternatives,alternatives; SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes,and manual toothbrushes; FIRST RESPONSE home pregnancy and ovulation test kits,kits; NAIR depilatories,depilatories; ORAJEL oral analgesics andanalgesic; XTRA laundry detergent. The ninth “power brand” isdetergent; the combination of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION brand names for the Company’s gummy vitamin dietary supplement business. The Company considers four of these brands to be “mega brands”: ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJANbusiness and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION, and is giving greatest focus to the growth of these brands.BATISTE dry shampoo. The Company’s business is divided into three primary segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and Specialty Products Division (“SPD”). The Consumer Domestic segment includes the power brands andnoted previously as well as other household and personal care products such as SCRUB FREE, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products, ANSWER home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, ARRID antiperspirant, and CLOSE-UP and AIM toothpastes.toothpastes and SIMPLY SALINE nasal saline moisturizer. The Consumer International segment primarily sells a variety of personal care products, some of which use the same brands as the Company’s domestic product lines, in international markets, including Canada, France,Europe, Australia, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Brazil. The SPD segment has a growing global animal productivity business with more than a dozen products designed to help improve the productivity and wellness of animals in animal agriculture. The segment is also the largest United States (“U.S.”) producer of sodium bicarbonate, which it sells together with other specialty inorganic chemicals for a variety of industrial, institutional, medical, and food applications. This segment also sells a range of animal nutrition and specialty cleaning products.applications. In 2013,2016, the Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD segments represented approximately 75%77%, 17%15% and 8%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales. All domestic brand “rankings” contained in this Annual Report are based on dollar share rankings from ACNielsen AOC (All Outlets Combined) for the 52 weeks endingended December 21, 2013.17, 2016. Foreign brand “rankings” are derived from several sources. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS As noted above, the Company’s business is organized into three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD. These segments are based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership structures. The businesses of these segments generally are not seasonal, although the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments are affected by sales of SPINBRUSH and ARM & HAMMER battery-operated toothbrushes (which typically are higher during the fall, in advance of the holiday season), sales of NAIR depilatories and waxes (which typically are higher in the spring and summer months), and sales of VITAFUSION and L’IL CRITTERS dietary supplements (which typically are slightly higher in the fourth quarter of each year, in advance of the cold and flu season and renewed commitments to health). Information concerning the net sales, operating income and identifiable assets of each of the segments is set forth in Note 1816 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is Item 7 of this Annual Report. CONSUMER PRODUCTS Consumer Domestic Principal Products The Company’s founders first marketed baking soda in 1846 for use in home baking. Today, this product has a wide variety of uses in the home, including as a refrigerator and freezer deodorizer, scratch-free cleaner and deodorizer for kitchen surfaces and cooking appliances, bath additive, dentifrice, cat litter deodorizer and swimming pool pH stabilizer. The Company specializes in baking soda-based products, as well as other products which use the same raw materials or technology or are sold in the same markets. In addition, this segment includes other deodorizing and household cleaning products, as well as laundry and personal care products. The following table sets forth the principal products of the Company’s Consumer Domestic segment.
| | | Type of Product | | Key Brand Names | | | | Household | | ARM & HAMMER Baking Soda | | | ARM & HAMMER Carpet Deodorizers | | | ARM & HAMMER Cat Litter Deodorizer | | | ARM & HAMMER Clumping Cat Litters (including CLUMP & SEAL) | | | ARM & HAMMER Powder, Liquid and Unit Dose Laundry Detergents | | | ARM & HAMMER Super Washing Soda | | | ARM & HAMMER FRESH’N SOFT Fabric Softeners | | | CLEAN SHOWER Daily Shower Cleaner | | | FELINE PINE Cat Litter | | | KABOOM Cleaning Products | | | NICE’N FLUFFY Fabric Softeners | | | ORANGE GLO Cleaning Products | | | OXICLEAN Dishwashing Detergent and Dishwashing Booster | | | OXICLEAN Laundry and Cleaning Solutions | | | SCRUB FREE Bathroom Cleaners | | | XTRA Fabric Softeners | | | XTRA Powder and Liquid Laundry Detergents | | | | Personal Care | | AIM Toothpaste | | | ANSWER Home Pregnancy and Ovulation Test Kits
| ARM & HAMMER Deodorants and Antiperspirants | | | ARM & HAMMER ToothpastesToothpaste and Oral Rinses (including TRULY RADIANT) | ARM & HAMMER TOOTH TUNES Toothbrushes
| | ARRID Antiperspirants | | | BATISTE Dry Shampoo | | | CLOSE-UP Toothpaste | | | FIRST RESPONSE Home Pregnancy and Ovulation Test Kits | | | L’IL CRITTERS Dietary Supplements | MENTADENT Toothpaste and Toothbrushes
| | NAIR Depilatories, Lotions, Creams and Waxes | | | ORAJEL Oral Analgesics | | | PEPSODENT Toothpaste | | | REPHRESH Feminine Hygiene Product | | | REPLENS Feminine Hygiene Product | | | SIMPLY SALINE Nasal Saline Moisturizer | | | SPINBRUSH Battery-operated Toothbrushes | | | SPINBRUSH Manual Toothbrushes | | | TOPPIK Hair Building Fibers | | | TROJAN Condoms, Lubricants and Vibrating Products VIVISCAL Non-drug Hair Growth Supplement | | | VITAFUSION Dietary Supplements |
Household Products In 2013,2016, household products constituted approximately 60% of the Company’s Domestic Consumer sales and approximately 45%46% of the Company’s totalconsolidated net sales. The ARM & HAMMER trademark was adopted in 1867. ARM & HAMMER Baking Soda remains the number one leading brand of baking soda in terms of consumer recognition of the brand name and reputation for quality and value. The deodorizing properties of baking soda have led to the development of several baking soda-based household products. For example, the Company markets ARM & HAMMER FRIDGE FRESH, a refrigerator deodorizer equipped with a baking soda filter to help keep food tasting fresher, and ARM & HAMMER Carpet Deodorizer. The Company’s laundry detergents constitute its largest consumer business, measured by net sales. The Company markets its ARM & HAMMER brand laundry detergents in powder, liquid and unit dose forms as value products, priced at a discount from products identified by the Company as market leaders. The Company markets ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN Odor Blasters liquid laundry detergent, ARM & HAMMER CLEAN SCENTSATIONS a line of laundry scent boosters inspired by U.S. National Parks, and ARM & HAMMER BioEnzyme Power unit dose laundry detergent. The Company markets its XTRA laundry detergent in bothliquid, powder and liquidsingle dose forms at a slightly lower price than ARM & HAMMER brand laundry detergents. The Company also markets XTRA LASTING SCENTSATIONS and XTRA FRESCO SCENTSATIONS, a line of highly fragranced and concentrated
liquid laundry detergents, and OXICLEAN laundry detergent and stain fighting additives. OXICLEAN is the number one brand in the U.S. laundry stain fighting additive market in the U.S. market. The Company markets ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN liquid and powder laundry detergents, combining the benefits of these two powerful laundry detergent products, and ARM & HAMMER CRYSTAL BURST and ARM & HAMMER TOSS’N DONE unit dose laundry detergents. In 2013, the Company launched ARM & HAMMER Ultra Power, a 4X concentrated liquid laundry detergent, and two new fragrances within its XTRA line: WARM VANILLA COMFORT and SENSITIVE SCENTS Rain Lily & Aloe. In 2014, the Company will launchincluding, ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN Ultra Power liquid detergent, an ultra-concentrated version of ARM & HAMMER PLUS OXICLEAN, ARM & HAMMER CLEAN SCENTSATIONS, a line of liquid detergents with fragrances inspired by U.S. National Parks,and OXICLEAN Power Paks. The Company also markets OXICLEAN laundry detergent, a premium-priced line of liquid, powder and unit dose laundry detergents, and OXICLEAN WHITE REVIVE a line of bleach alternatives in both powderlaundry detergent, OXICLEAN versatile stain remover plus Odor Blasters and OXICLEAN washing machine cleaner. In 2016, the Company introduced ARM & HAMMER BioEnzyme Power liquid, ARM & HAMMER Tropical Paradise Scent Booster and OXICLEAN Max Force Foam laundry stain remover. In 2017, the Company has launched ARM & HAMMER plus OXICLEAN Stainfighters Triple Chamber unit dose forms.laundry detergent. The Company’s laundry products also include fabric softener sheets that prevent static cling and soften and freshen clothes. The Company markets ARM & HAMMER FRESH’N SOFT fabric softeners and offers a liquid fabric softener, NICE’N FLUFFY, at a slightly lower price enabling the Company to compete at several price points. The Company also markets a line of cat litter products, including ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL clumping cat litter, ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL lightweight cat litter, ARM & HAMMER SUPER SCOOP clumping cat litter and ARM & HAMMER ULTRA LAST, a longer lasting clumping cat litter. Other products include ARM & HAMMER Multi-Cat cat litter, designed for households with more than one cat, ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS clumping cat litter, a corn-based scoopable litter made for consumers who prefer to use products made with natural ingredients and ARM & HAMMER Double Duty cat litter, which eliminates both urine and feces odors on contact. The Company markets its FELINE PINE cat litter in the natural litter segment, complementing the Company’s ARM & HAMMER branded cat litter business and positioning the Company as a leading supplier of natural cat litter. In December 2013,2016, the Company introduced a new line of clumping cat litter,launched ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL designed to helpMICROGUARD, which seals and destroys immediate odors and prevents future bacterial odors. In 2017, the Company has launched ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL SLIDE cat owners enjoy an odor-free home.litter, which slides out of the litter box for easy cleaning. In addition, the Company markets a line of household cleaning products including CLEAN SHOWER daily shower cleaner and SCRUB FREE bathroom cleaners. The Company also markets KABOOM bathroom cleaners, ORANGE GLO household cleaning products, and OXICLEAN Dishwashing Booster, which removes cloudy film and food particles on glasses and dishes. In 2013,2016, the Company introducedlaunched KABOOM no-drip foam, a spray product designed to eliminatePlus Disinfex bathroom mold and mildew. In 2014, the Company will launch KABOOM SHOWER GUARD, a daily shower cleaning product, and will extend its OXICLEAN brand by launching its first-ever OXICLEAN automatic dishwasher dishwashing detergent. surface cleaner. Personal Care Products The Company’s personal care business was founded on the unique strengths of its ARM & HAMMER trademark and baking soda technology. The Company has expanded its personal care business through its acquisition of antiperspirants, oral care products, depilatories, reproductive health products, oral analgesics, nasal saline moisturizers and dietary supplements under a variety of other leading brand names. In 2013,2016, Personal Care Products constituted approximately 40% of the Company’s Consumer Domestic sales and approximately 30%31% of the Company’s total sales. ARM & HAMMER Baking Soda, when used as a dentifrice, helps whiten and polish teeth, removes plaque and leaves the mouth feeling fresh and clean. These properties led to the development of a complete line of sodium bicarbonate-based bicarbonate-baseddentifrice products whichthat are marketed and sold nationally primarily under the ARM & HAMMER DENTAL CARE, andARM & HAMMER SENSITIVE, ARM & HAMMER ADVANCE WHITE brand names, including a line of toothpaste for sensitive teeth under the ARM & HAMMER brand. In 2014, the Company will introduceand ARM & HAMMER TRULY RADIANT toothpaste. brand names. The Company also manufactures in the U.S. and markets in the U.S. (including Puerto Rico) and Canada CLOSE-UP, PEPSODENT and AIM toothpastes, which are priced at a discount from the market leaders, and the MENTADENT brand of toothpaste and toothbrushes. In addition, theleaders. The Company markets deodorant and antiperspirant products under thesells ARRID and ARM & HAMMER antiperspirants and ARRIDdeodorants in the U.S and Mexico. The ARM & HAMMER brand names.was the third fastest growing antiperspirant brand, in the U. S., in 2016 behind the success of ARM & HAMMER Essentials line-extension, introduced in 2014. In 2017, the Company has launched a new ARM & HAMMER Essentials fragrance (Clean). Condoms are recognized as highly reliable contraceptives as well as an effective means of reducing the risk of sexually transmitted diseases. The Company’s TROJAN condom brand is the number one condom brand in the U.S., and has been in use for more than 90100 years. The brand includes such products as ECSTASY, TROJAN EXTENDED PLEASURE, HER PLEASURE, TWISTED PLEASURE, SHARED PLEASURE,BARESKIN, MAGNUM, and FIRE & ICE, TROJAN CHARGED, a condom with a sensate lubricant that has heating, cooling and tingling properties,DOUBLE ECSTACY, TROJAN MAGNUM RIBBED, TROJAN STUDDED BARESKIN, MAGNUM BARESKIN and TROJAN Vibrations, a line of vibrating products. In 2013, theThe Company launchedalso markets a line of lubrication products under the TROJAN brand such as TROJAN H2O and TROJAN PURE ECSTASY condoms.TONIGHT. In 2014,2016, the Company will introduce line extensions intolaunched the TROJAN lubricant line and market two new condoms:GROOVE condom, TROJAN DOUBLE ECSTASYDIVINE Massager, TROJAN 2-1 Vibrating Ring and TROJAN MAGNUM ribbed. TheRIVIERA lubricant. In 2017, the Company will also introduce two new vibrating products under itsplans to launch XOXO by TROJAN, Vibrations line.an upscale, discrete condom targeting both men and women with a soft touch, aloe lubricated latex in a unique portable carrying case.
The Company markets SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes in the U.S. (including Puerto Rico), the United Kingdom, Canada, France, China and Australia. In 2013, theThe SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrush was the number one leading brand of battery-operated toothbrushes in the U.S. in 2016. The Company also markets SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN and SPINBRUSH TRULY RADIANT toothbrushes, featuring a two-speed version of the product,patented brush head design leading to superior plaque removal versus manual brushes, SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN Recharge, a rechargeable toothbrush offering up to one week of power brushes between charges, SPINBRUSH PROCLEAN Sonic, a value high speed battery-operated toothbrush which competes with much more expensive “sonic” toothbrushes, and ARM & HAMMER TOOTH TUNES battery-operatedSPINBRUSH manual toothbrushes with proprietary technology that delivers music while brushing.rotating heads and SPINBRUSH KIDS featuring top licensed characters from partners like NICKELODEON, DISNEY, MARVEL and HASBRO. In 2013,2016, the Company launched additional song offerings under its TOOTH TUNES brand, including songs by the band One Direction. In 2014, the Company will introduce a line ofintroduced ARM & HAMMER SPINBRUSH TRULY RADIANT toothbrushes.Clean & Fresh, building off of the success of TRULY RADIANT from 2014 and 2015. In 2017, the Company entered the slim vibrating toothbrush segment with ARM & HAMMER SPINBRUSH Sonic Pulse. Building on our successful partnership with NICKELODEON and the PAW PATROL franchise, ARM & HAMMER SPINBRUSH KIDS has launched a SHIMMER & SHINE battery toothbrush to continue growth on the children’s vibrating toothbrush business. The Company markets two lines of home pregnancy and ovulation test kits. Its FIRST RESPONSE brand of diagnostic kits includes a home female fertility test. Its ANSWER home pregnancy and ovulation test kits competeis the number one selling brand in the value segment of the market. In 2014, the Company will launchU.S. and includes an enhanced FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kit that can tell a woman that she is pregnant up to six days before her expected period, with 99% accuracy from the day of her missed period. The Company’s NAIR depilatoryhair-removal brand is the number one selling depilatory brand in the U.S., with innovative products that address consumer needs for quick, complete and longer-lasting hair removal. The Company offers a full arrayline of depilatory products for women men and teensmen under the NAIR brand name, including Cool Gel, SHOWER POWER, Roll-On, Milk N’Honey,SPRAYS AWAY, and Brazilian Spa Clay products for both depilatory and wax. In 2013, the Company added to this line with its NAIR TOTAL CARE body and face trios. In 2014, the Company will introduce four new NAIR hair-removal products: two products under the new NAIRMoroccan Argan Oil line of depilatories and waxes. In 2016, the Company launched NAIR FOR MENNOURISH SHOWER POWER, Sprays Away depilatories with Japanese Cherry Blossom and 100% Natural Rice Bran Oil and NAIR SPRAYS AWAY.Wax Ready-strips for Face and Body, with no warming or rubbing required and results that last up to eight weeks. In 2017, the Company has launched NAIR Skin Renewal depilatories with grape seed oil and antioxidant-rich resveratrol. To help grow the NAIR wax business, the Company also launched NAIR Wax Bikini Pro Kit, a microwaveable stripless wax that is effective on coarse bikini hair and helps reduce pain while waxing.
The Company markets ORAJEL oral analgesics and oral care products which includes products for both adults as well as babies, including ORAJEL Cooling Cucumber Teething Gel and BABY ORAJEL Tooth and Gum Cleanser.children. The ORAJEL brand remains the market leader in the toothache, canker sore, and children’s teething and toothache line of products is the number one brandcategories in the U.S. and continues to grow its presence in the children’s toothpaste and cold sore categories. In 2013,2016, the Company strengthened its positioning within the cold sore segment by introducing new ORAJEL Moisturelock Cold Sore Treatment that treats six symptoms of cold sores and by re-launching its ORAJEL Touch-Free Cold Sore Treatment which provides pain relief via convenient, touch-free application. In 2017 the Company has launched a single dose cold sore product under thenew ORAJEL brand. In 2014, theToothache Rinse to provide toothache sufferers non-numbing pain relief. The Company will introduce several teethingis also furthering its partnership with NICKELODEON and toothache line extensionsfollowing its successful PAW PATROL toothpaste launch with licensed characters under the ORAJEL trademark.a new SHIMMER & SHINE toothpaste. The Company markets and sells the L’IL CRITTERS children’s gummy vitamin dietary supplement line and the VITAFUSION adult gummy vitamin dietary supplement line, both number one leading brands in the gummy-formtheir respective categories. The Company markets VITAFUSION Extra Strength line extensions, FIRST RESPONSE reproductive health dietary supplements and L’IL CRITTERS dietary supplement category.line of licensed characters (Barbie and Super Mario) under those brands. The Company also markets and sells a line of gummy probiotics under the ACCUFLORA brand name, a line of probiotics and gummy supplements under the NUTRITION NOW brand name and private label gummy vitamins. dietary supplements. In 2014,2016, the Company launched L’IL CRITTERS Despicable Me dietary supplement, and a line of nutritional beauty-inspired supplements including VITAFUSION Gorgeous Hair, Skin & Nails, VITAFUSION Beauty Sleep and VITAFUSION Relaxed Mood. In 2017, the Company will introduce twolaunch a new linesVITAFUSION energy variant that supports everyday energy needs and alertness. The Company markets a growing number of gummy vitamin dietary supplements: VITAFUSION MULTIVITES PLUShair care products, including BATISTE dry shampoo, a significantly growing brand as distribution, category awareness and L’IL CRITTERS GUMMY VITES PLUS.trial continues to increase. In 2017, the Company has launched BATISTE Bare, a low-fragrance variant and purse-size offerings of top-selling color dry shampoos, BATISTE Divine Dark and BATISTE Brilliant Blonde. The Company also markets TOPPIK Hair Building Fibers and other hair cosmetics under the TOPPIK brand name, the number one leading brand of cosmetics for thinning hair. The Company also markets a line of hair cosmetics for salon professionals under the XFUSION brand name. On January 17, 2017, the Company acquired the VIVISCAL brand (the “Viviscal Acquisition”) from Life2good Holdings Limited for $160 million. VIVISCAL is the number one non-drug hair growth supplement in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. The Company markets the SIMPLY SALINE brand of nasal saline moisturizers in the U.S., complementing the Company’s STERIMAR brand nasal saline solution business in Europe and other parts of the world. The Company also markets BATISTE dry shampoo in the U.S.
Consumer International The Consumer International segment markets a variety of personal care products, household and over-the-counter products in international markets, including Canada, France, Australia, China, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Brazil.Brazil. Export sales from the U.S. are included in this segment. Total Consumer International net sales represented approximately 17%15% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2013.2016. Net sales of the subsidiariesbusinesses located in Europe, Canada, the United Kingdom, France Mexico and Australia accounted for 37%35%, 18%32%, 15% 10% and 11%10%, respectively, of the Company’s 20132016 international net sales in this segment. No other country in which the Company operates accounts for more than 10% of its total international net sales and no product line accounts for more than 15%20% of total international net sales. Certain of the Company’s international product lines are similar to its domestic product lines.lines and many are unique. For example, the Company markets its ARM & HAMMER and OXICLEAN laundry products and TROJAN condoms in Canada and Mexico, ARM & HAMMER cat litter in Canada, home pregnancy and ovulation test kits and oral care products in most of its international markets, waxes and depilatory products in virtually all international locations TROJAN condoms in Canada and Mexico and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplements principally in Canada and Asia.Asia. The Company has expanded distribution of ARM & HAMMER products internationally by marketing ARM & HAMMER laundry and pet care products in Canada and ARM & HAMMER laundry care products in Mexico. The Company also markets SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes internationally, primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, France, China and Australia, and OXICLEAN products internationally, primarily in Mexico and Canada.
Australia. The Company sells PEARL DROPS dentifrice products in Europe, Canada and Australia and STERIMAR nasal hygiene products in a number of markets in Europe, as well as in Mexico, parts of Asia and Australia.Australia and other international markets. The Company also sells BATISTE dry shampoo principally in the United Kingdom, and also inwhere it is the number one selling dry shampoo, Australia, Canada, France, Brazil, China and Mexico, as well as other markets including the U. S. The Company also markets the CURASH BABYCARE line of babycare products including wipes, creams and powders in Australia, and GRAVOL anti-nauseant and RUB-A535 topical analgesic in Canada.Canada and other international markets. On December 22, 2016, the Company acquired the ANUSOL and RECTINOL businesses from Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (“Johnson & Johnson”) for $130 (the “Anusol Acquisition”). These are the number one or number two hemorrhoid care brands in each market in which they operate primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and South Africa. COMPETITION FOR CONSUMER DOMESTIC AND CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL The Company competes in the household and personal care consumer product categories, which are highly innovative categories, characterized by a continuous flow of new products and line extensions, and require significant advertising and promotion. The Company competes in these categories primarily on the basis of product innovation and performance, brand recognition, price, value and other consumer benefits. Consumer products, particularly laundry and household cleaning products, as well as certain toothpaste products, are subject to significant price competition. As a result, the Company from time to time may need to reduce the prices for some of its products to respond to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain market share.share. Internationally, the Company competes in similar competitive categories for most of its products. The Company’s competitors include The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), The Sun Products Corporation,&G, The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Nestle Purina PetCare Company, Henkel, AG & Co. KGaA, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Johnson & Johnson, Ansell Limited, Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG, Alere Inc. (formerly known as Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.), NBTY, Inc. and Pharmavite LLC. Many of these companies have greater financial resources than the Company and have the capacity to outspend the Company if they attempt to gain market share.share. In 2016, Henkel acquired Sun Products, making Henkel the second leading laundry detergent company in the U. S. Product introductions typically involve heavy marketing costsand trade spending in the year of launch, and the Company usually is not able to determine whether the new products and line extensions will be successful until a period of time has elapsed following the introduction of the new products or the extension of the product line.line. Because of the competitive environment facing retailers, the Company faces pricing pressure from customers, particularly high-volume retailer store customers, who have increasingly sought to obtain pricing concessions or better trade terms. These concessions or terms could reduce the Company’s margins. Furthermore, if the Company is unable to maintain price or trade terms acceptable to its customers, they could increase product purchases from competitors and reduce purchases from the Company, which would harm the Company’s sales and profitability.profitability.
DISTRIBUTION FOR CONSUMER DOMESTIC Products in the Consumer Domestic segment are marketed throughout the U.S. primarily through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores, and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company employs a sales force based regionally throughout the U.S. thatand utilizes the services of independent food brokers, who represent the Company’s products in the food, mass, pet, dollar and club, as well as numerous other classes of trade. The Company’s products are stored in Company plants and third-party owned warehouses and are either delivered by independent trucking companies or picked up by customers at the Company’s facilities.facilities. DISTRIBUTION FOR CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL Products in the Consumer International segment are marketed primarily through a broad distribution platformsold broadly across retail platforms that includesinclude supermarkets, wholesale clubs, pharmacies and drugstores, convenience stores, discount stores and discount stores.websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company’s Consumer International distribution network reflects capacityis well-established and cost considerations invaries according to the regions served. In Canada, Mexiconeeds of each market. Subsidiary countries primarily utilize internal warehousing and Australia, finished goods are warehoused internallydistribution capabilities that enable direct shipment to key retailers. Export markets primarily rely upon third party suppliers to market, warehouse and shipped directly to customers through independent freight carriers. In the United Kingdom, domestic product distribution is subcontracted to professional distribution companies, while export product distribution is handled internally and shipped from the Company’s warehouses. In France, distribution of consumerdistribute products to mass markets is handled internally while distribution of the Company’s over-the-counter products to pharmacies and professional diagnostics to laboratories is handled by outside agencies. In Brazil and China, all product distribution is subcontracted to professional distribution companies. end customers. Specialty Products Division Principal Products The Company’s SPD segment focuses on sales to businesses and participates in three product areas: Animal Productivity, Specialty Chemicals Animal Nutrition and Specialty Cleaners, and accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2013.2016. The following table sets forth the principal products of the Company’s SPD segment. Type of Product | | Key Brand Names | Type of ProductAnimal Productivity
| | Key Brand NamesARM & HAMMER Feed Grade Sodium Bicarbonate
| | | BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN Rumen Fermentation Enhancers | | | DCAD PLUS Feed Grade Potassium Carbonate (1) | | | MEGALAC Rumen Bypass Fat (2) | | | ESSENTIOM Omega 3 & Omega 6 Essential Fatty Acids | | | MEGAMINE-L, Rumen Bypass Lysine | | | SQ-810 Natural Sodium Sesquicarbonate | | | CELMANAX Refined Functional Carbohydrate | | | | Specialty Chemicals | | ARM & HAMMER Performance Grade Sodium Bicarbonate | | | ARMAND PRODUCTS COMPANY Potassium Carbonate and Potassium Bicarbonate (1)( | | | Enprove Ground Trona(2)3 | | | Enprove Sodium Bicarbonate(2)) | | | Animal Nutrition
| | ARM & HAMMER Feed Grade Sodium Bicarbonate | | | BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN Rumen Fermentation Enhancers | | | DCAD PLUS Feed Grade Potassium Carbonate(3) | | | Megalac Rumen Bypass Fat(4) | | | Megalac-R Omega 3 & Omega 6 Essential Fatty Acids(4) | | | MEGAMINE-L, Rumen Bypass Lysine | | | SQ-810 Natural Sodium Sesquicarbonate | | | Specialty Cleaners | | ARMAKLEEN Commercial & Professional Aqueous Cleaners (5)(4) | | | ARMEX Blast Media (5)(4) | | | Commercial & Professional Cleaners and Deodorizers | | | |
(1) | Manufactured and marketedfor the Company by Armand Products Company (“Armand”),. |
(2) | MEGALAC is a registered trademark of Volac International Limited. |
(3) | Manufactured and marketed by Armand, a joint venture in which the Company holds a 50% interest. |
(2)(4) | Distributed and marketed by Natronx, a joint venture in which the Company holds a one-third ownership interest. Enprove is a registered trademark of FMC Corporation (“FMC”) that has been assigned to Natronx with the right of reversion to FMC upon a Natronx dissolution. |
(3) | Manufactured for the Company by Armand Products Company. |
(4) | Megalac is a registered trademark of Volac International Limited. |
(5) | Distributed in North America by The ArmaKleen Company (“ArmaKleen”), a joint venture in which the Company holds a 50% ownership interest. |
Animal Productivity Products The Company markets a special grade of sodium bicarbonate and sodium sesquicarbonate to the animal feed market as a feed additive for use by the dairy industry as a buffer, or antacid, for dairy cattle. The Company also markets DCAD PLUS feed grade potassium carbonate, which is manufactured by Armand as a feed additive into the animal feed market. The Company markets MEGALAC rumen bypass fat, a nutritional supplement made from natural oils, which enables cows to maintain energy levels during the period of high milk production, resulting in improved milk yields and minimized weight loss. The MEGALAC product and the trademark are licensed under a long-term license agreement from Volac International Limited, a British Company.
The Company also markets BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN, a range of specialty feed ingredients for dairy cows, which improve rumen feed efficiency and help increase milk production. The Company manufactures CELMANAX Refined Functional Carbohydrate and other feed additives for cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock for sale in domestic and international markets and used to promote livestock digestive health and performance. Specialty Chemicals The Company’s specialty chemicals business primarily encompasses the manufacture, marketing and sale of sodium bicarbonate in a range of grades and granulations for use in industrial markets. In industrial markets, sodium bicarbonate is used by other manufacturing companies as a leavening agent for commercial baked goods, as an antacid in pharmaceuticals, as a carbon dioxide release agent in fire extinguishers, as an alkaline agent in swimming pool chemicals, and as a buffer in kidney dialysis.dialysis. The Company’s 99.8% owned Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral do Nordeste (“QGN”), markets sodium bicarbonate in Brazil and is South America’s leading provider of sodium bicarbonate. During fourth quarter of 2016, the Company decided to sell its Brazilian chemical business to focus on its Brazilian consumer business, resulting in a plant impairment charge of $4.9 recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016 based upon an anticipated selling price. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company signed an agreement to sell the business, resulting in an approximate $5.0 expense for severance and other charges. Sales for the Brazilian chemical business in 2016 were approximately $22.0. The business markets sodium bicarbonate in Brazil.Company anticipates the transaction to close during the first quarter. The Company and Occidental Chemical Corporation are equal partners in a joint venture, Armand, which manufactures and markets potassium carbonate and potassium bicarbonate for sale in domestic and international markets. The potassium-based products are used in a wide variety of applications, including agricultural products, specialty glass and ceramics, and potassium silicates. Armand also manufactures for the Company a potassium carbonate-based animal feed additive for sale in the dairy industry, described below above under “Animal NutritionProductivity Products.” The Company, FMC and TATA Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners are equal partners in Natronx. The Company’s investment is accounted for under the equity method. Natronx engages in the marketing and distribution of sodium-based, dry sorbents for air pollution control in electric utility and industrial boiler operations. The sorbents, primarily sodium bicarbonate and trona, are used by coal-fired utilities to remove harmful pollutants, such as acid gases, in flue-gas treatment processes.
Animal Nutrition Products
A special grade of sodium bicarbonate, as well as sodium sesquicarbonate, is sold to the animal feed market as a feed additive for use by the dairy industry as a buffer, or antacid, for dairy cattle. The Company also markets DCAD PLUS feed grade potassium carbonate, which is manufactured by Armand as a feed additive into the animal feed market.
The Company markets MEGALAC rumen bypass fat, a nutritional supplement made from natural oils, which enables cows to maintain energy levels during the period of high milk production, resulting in improved milk yields and minimized weight loss. The product and the trademark MEGALAC are licensed under a long-term license agreement from a British company, Volac International Limited.
The Company also markets BIO-CHLOR and FERMENTEN, a range of specialty feed ingredients for dairy cows, which improve rumen feed efficiency and help increase milk production.
Specialty Cleaners The Company also provides a line of cleaning and deodorizing products for use in commercial and industrial applications such as office buildings, hotels, restaurants and other facilities.facilities. The Company and Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. (“Safety-Kleen”) are equal partners in a joint venture, ArmaKleen, which has built a specialty cleaning products business based on the Company’s technology and Safety-Kleen’s sales and distribution organization. In North America, this joint venture distributes the Company’s proprietary product line of aqueous cleaners along with the Company’s ARMEX blast media line, which is designed for the removal of a wide variety of surface coatings. The Company continues to pursue opportunities to build this industrial cleaning business using the Company’s aqueous-based technology as well as the ARMEX blast media line of products. COMPETITION FOR SPD Competition within the specialty chemicals and animal nutritionproductivity product lines is intense. The specialty chemicals business operates in a competitive environment influenced by capacity utilization, customers’ leverage and the impact of raw material and energy costs. Product introductions typically involve introductory costs in the year of launch, and the Company usually is not able to determine whether new products and line extensions will be successful until a period of time has elapsed following the introduction of new products or the extension of the product lines. The Company’s key competitors are Archer Daniel Midland Co, Diamond V, Lallemand Inc., Solvay Chemicals, Inc., FMCTronox USA Holdings, Inc. and Natural Soda, Inc.Inc. DISTRIBUTION FOR SPD SPD markets sodium bicarbonate and other chemicals to industrial and agricultural customers primarily throughout the U.S. and Canada. Distribution is accomplished through a dedicated sales force supplemented by manufacturers’ representatives and the sales personnel of independent distributors throughout the country. The Company’s products in this segment are located in Company plants and public warehouses and are either delivered by independent trucking companies or picked up by customers at the Company’s facilities.facilities.
RAW MATERIALS AND SOURCES OF SUPPLY The Company manufactures sodium bicarbonate for both its consumer and specialty products businesses at its plants located at Green River, Wyoming and Old Fort, Ohio. The primary source of soda ash, a basic raw material used by the Company in the production of sodium bicarbonate, is the mineral trona, which is found in abundance in southwestern Wyoming near the Company’s Green River plant. The Company has adequate trona reserves under mineral leases to support the Company’s sodium bicarbonate requirements for the foreseeable future.future. The Company is party to a partnership agreement with Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners, which mines and processes trona reserves in Wyoming. Through the partnership and related supply and services agreements, the Company fulfills a substantial amount of its soda ash requirements, enabling the Company to achieve some of the economies of an integrated business capable of producing sodium bicarbonate and related products from the basic raw material. The Company also has an agreement for the supply of soda ash from another company. The partnership agreement and other supply agreements between the Company and Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners are terminable upon two years notice by either company. The Company believes that sufficient alternative sources of soda ash supply are available.available. The Company believes that ample sources of raw materials are available for all of its other major products. Detergent chemicals are used in a variety of the Company’s products and are available from a number of sources. Bottles, paper products and clay are available from multiple suppliers, although the Company chooses to source most of these materials from single sources under long-term supply agreements in order to gain favorable pricing. The Company also uses a palm oil fraction (by-product) in a number of products including, its rumen bypass fats products. Alternative sources of supply are available in case of disruption or termination of the supply agreements.agreements. The cost of raw materials, including surfactants, diesel fuel and oil-basedoil based raw and packaging materials used primarily in the Company’s consumer businesses, continued to be highwere lower in 20132016 relative to prior years. However, while the market price of ethylene-based resin was at an all-time high in 2013,2015, reducing the Company’s cost for this material was mitigated as a result of the Company’s ability to contractually lock in pricing for the first nine months of 2013.core commodity costs. Increases in the prices of certain raw materials could materially impact the Company’s costs and financial results if the Company is unable to pass such costs along in the form of price increases to its customers.customers. The Company utilizes the services of third party contract manufacturers around the world for certain products. PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS The Company’s trademarks appear in upper case letters throughout this Annual Report. The majority of the Company’s trademarks are registered with either the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or with the trademark offices of many foreign countries. The ARM & HAMMER trademark has been used by the Company since 1867, and is a valuable asset and important to the successful operation of the Company’s business. The Company’s products are sold under many other valuable trademarks held by the Company, including TROJAN, NAIR, ORAJEL, FIRST RESPONSE, XTRA, OXICLEAN, SPINBRUSH, BATISTE, SIMPLY SALINE, FELINE PINE, L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION. The Company’s portfolio of trademarks represents substantial goodwill in the businesses using the trademarks.trademarks. U.S. patents are currently granted for a term of 20 years from the date the patent application is filed. Although the Company actively seeks and maintains a number of patents, no single patent is considered significant to the business as a whole.whole. CUSTOMERS AND ORDER BACKLOG In each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, net sales to the Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates (“Wal-Mart”), were 24%, 24% and 23%25% respectively, of the Company’s total consolidated net sales. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales in the three-year period. The time between receipt of orders and shipment is generally short, and as a result, backlog is not significant. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales in the three year period. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT The Company conducts research and development activities primarily at its Princeton and Cranbury facilitiesfacility in New Jersey. The Company devotes significant resources and attention to product development, process technology and basic research to develop differentiated products with new and distinctive features and to provide increased convenience and value to its customers. To increase its innovative capabilities, the Company engages outside contractors for general research and development in activities beyond its core areas of expertise. The Company spent $61.8$63.2 million, $54.8$64.7 million and $55.1$59.8 million on research and development activities in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION General Some of the Company’s products are subject to regulation by one or more U.S. agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) and foreign agencies. FDA regulations govern a variety of matters relating to the Company’s products, such as product development, manufacturing, premarket clearance or approval, advertising and distribution. The regulations adopted and standards imposed by the FDA and similar foreign agencies evolve over time and can require the Company to make changes in its manufacturing processes and quality systems to remain in compliance. These agencies periodically inspect manufacturing and other facilities. If the Company fails to comply with applicable regulations and standards, it may be subject to sanctions, including fines and penalties, the recall of products and cessation of manufacturing and/or distribution.distribution. In addition, the Company sells products that are subject to regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act, both of which are administered by the EPA. The Company also is subject to regulation by the FTC in connection with the content of its labeling, advertising, promotion, trade practices and other matters.matters. The CPSC administers the Poison Prevention Packaging Act, and has issued regulations requiring special child resistant packaging for certain products, including pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements, and dietary substances, containing certain ingredients (e.g., iron). The Company’s relationship with certain union employees may be overseen by the National Labor Relations Board. The Company’s activities also are regulated by various agencies of the countries, states, localitiesprovinces and foreign countriesother localities in which the Company sells its products.products. Medical Device Clearance and Approval To be commercially distributed in the U.S., a medical device must, unless exempt, receive clearance or approval from the FDA pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Lower risk devices are categorized as either class I or II devices. For class II devices, the manufacturer must generally submit a premarket notification requesting clearance for commercial distribution known as a “510(k)” clearance. The Company’s condoms, lubricants, contact lens solution, wound wash and home pregnancy and ovulation test kits are regulated as class II devices. Some low risk devices, including SPINBRUSH and ARM & HAMMERother battery powered toothbrushes, are in class I and are generally exempted from the 510(k) requirement. To obtain 510(k) clearance, a device must be determined to be substantially equivalent in intended use and in safety and effectiveness to a benchmark device, or “predicate” that is already legally in commercial distribution. Any modification to a 510(k) cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a change in its intended use, generally requires a new 510(k) clearance. A manufacturer may determine that a new 510(k) clearance is not required, but if the FDA disagrees, it may retroactively require a 510(k) clearance and may require the manufacturer to cease marketing or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance is obtained.obtained. Medical Device Postmarket Regulation After a medical device is commercialized, numerous regulatory requirements apply, including: the quality system regulation, which imposes FDA current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) requirements governing the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the design, manufacture, packaging, servicing, labeling, storage, installation, and distribution of all finished medical devices intended for human use; labeling regulations, including a prohibition on product promotion for unapproved or “off label” uses; the medical device reporting regulation requiring a manufacturer to report to the FDA if its device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and the reports of corrections and removals regulation, which requires a manufacturer to report recalls and field actions to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health.
OTC Pharmaceutical The Company markets over-the-counter (“OTC”) pharmaceutical products, such as toothpaste, antiperspirant, and oral analgesics products, that are also subject to FDA and foreign regulation. Under the U.S. OTC monograph system, selected OTC pharmaceutical products are generally recognized as safe and effective and do not require the submission and approval of a new drug application. The FDA OTC monographs include well-known ingredients and specify requirements for permitted indications, required warnings and precautions, allowable combinations of ingredients and dosage levels. Pharmaceutical products marketed under the OTC monograph system must conform to specific quality, formula and labeling requirements.requirements. All facilities where OTC pharmaceutical products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored or distributed must comply with cGMP regulations and/or regulations promulgated by competent authorities in the countries where the facilities are located. All of the Company’s pharmaceutical products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored and distributed according to cGMP regulations. The FDA performs periodic audits to ensure that the Company’s facilities remain in compliance with all appropriate regulations. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to a breach of representations made to customers or to regulatory action against the Company related to the products made in that facility, such as seizure, injunction or recall. Serious product quality concerns could also result in governmental actions against the Company that, among other things, could result in the suspension of production or distribution of the Company’s products, product seizures, loss of certain licenses or other governmental penalties, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operating results. The manufacturer, packer, or distributor of an OTC pharmaceutical product marketed in the U.S. whose name appears on the label of such product is required to report serious adverse events associated with the use of the product.product. The Company cannot predict whether new legislation regulating the Company’s activities will be enacted or what effect any legislation would have on the Company’s business. business.Food Products The Company markets baking soda and animal feed products, such as rumen fermentation enhancers and Dietary Cation-Anion Difference (“DCAD”) balancers that are also subject to FDA and foreign regulation. In 2011, the Food Safety Modernization Act (“FSMA”) was enacted, changing the ways in which food and animal feed products are regulated. Under the provisions of the FSMA, the emphasis shifted from compliant products to mandatory preventive controls including hazard analysis, risk controls, supplier qualifications and controls and increased record keeping. FSMA grants the FDA the authority to require mandatory recalls for products under certain conditions. The FDA is currently in the process of establishing rules and guidance to implement the provisions of FSMA. The potential impact of these rules and applicable guidance cannot be determined at this time. DDietaryietary Supplements The processing, formulation, safety, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising, distribution, importing, selling, and storing of dietary supplements are subject to regulation by one or more federal agencies, including the FDA, the FTC, the CPSC, the EPA, and by various agencies of the states and localities in which the Company’s products are sold. The FDCA governs the composition, safety, labeling, manufacturing and marketing of dietary supplements.supplements. Generally, dietary ingredients that were marketed in the U.S. prior to October 15, 1994 may be used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. “New” dietary ingredients (i.e., dietary ingredients that were not marketed in the U.S. before October 15, 1994) must be the subject of a new dietary ingredient notification submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before the initial marketing unless the ingredient has been present in the food supply as an article used for food without being chemically altered. A new dietary ingredient notification must provide evidence of a history of use or other evidence establishing that use of the dietary ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe. The FDA may determine that a new dietary ingredient notification does not provide an adequate basis to conclude that a dietary ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe. Such a determination could effectively prevent the marketing of the dietary ingredient. On July 5, 2011, the FDA issued draft guidance governing notification of new dietary ingredients. The draft guidance was issued for public comment and not for implementation. To date the FDA has not taken any further steps towards implementing the guidance. The guidance, if implemented, could effectively change the status of dietary ingredients that the industry has marketed as “old” dietary ingredients to “new” dietary ingredients that may require submission of a new dietary ingredient notification.notification. The FDCA permits “statements of nutritional support” to be included in labeling for dietary supplements without FDA pre-market approval. The FDA must be notified of those statements within 30 days of marketing. Among other things, the statements may describe the role of a dietary ingredient intended to affect the structure or function of the body or characterize the documented mechanism of action by which a dietary ingredient maintains such structure or function, but may not expressly or implicitly represent that a dietary supplement will diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease. A company that uses a statement of nutritional
support in labeling must possess information substantiating that the statement is truthful and not misleading. If the FDA determines that a particular statement of nutritional support is an unacceptable drug claim or an unauthorized version of a health claim, or if the FDA determines that a particular claim is not adequately supported by existing scientific evidence or is otherwise false or misleading, the claim could not be used and any product bearing the claim could be subject to regulatory action. The FDA’s cGMP regulations govern the manufacturing, packaging, labeling and holding operations of dietary supplement manufacturers. As with OTC products, the FDA performs periodic audits to ensure that the Company’s dietary supplement facilities remain in compliance with all appropriate regulations. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to a breach of representation made to customers or to regulatory action against the Company related to the products made in that facility, seizure, injunction or recall. There remains considerable uncertainty with respect to the FDA’s interpretation of the cGMP regulations and their actual implementation in manufacturing facilities. The failure of a manufacturing facility to comply with the cGMP regulations may render products manufactured in that facility adulterated, and subjects those products and the manufacturer to a variety of potential FDA enforcement actions. In addition, under recent amendments to the FDCA, the manufacturing of dietary ingredients contained in dietary supplements will be subject to similar or even more burdensome requirements, which may increase the costs of dietary ingredients and subject suppliers of such ingredients to more rigorous inspections and enforcement. The manufacturer, packer, or distributor of a dietary supplement marketed in the U.S. whose name appears on the label of the supplement is required to report serious adverse events associated with the use of that supplement to the FDA. The FTC exercises jurisdiction over the advertising of dietary supplements. The FTC considers whether a product’s advertising claims are accurate, truthful and not misleading pursuant to its authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act, or FTC Act. The FTC has instituted numerous enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies for failure to adequately substantiate claims made in advertising or for the use of otherwise false or misleading advertising claims. These enforcement actions have resulted in consent decrees and the payment of civil penalties and/or restitution by the companies involved. Such actions can result in substantial financial penalties and significantly restrict the marketing of a dietary supplement. LegislationAdditional legislation may be introduced which, if passed, would impose substantial new regulatory requirements on dietary supplements. The effect of additional domestic or international governmental legislation, regulations, or administrative orders, if and when promulgated, cannot be determined. New legislation or regulations may require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, and require the recall or discontinuance of certain products not capable of reformulation.reformulation.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS The Company’s operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations relating to environmental and health and safety concerns including air emissions, wastewater discharges, and solid and hazardous waste management activities.activities, and the safety of its employees. The Company endeavors to take actions necessary to comply with such regulations. These steps include periodic environmental and health and safety audits of Company facilities. The audits, conducted by independent engineering firms with expertise in environmental, health and safety compliance, include site visits at each location, as well as, a review of documentary information, to determine compliance with such federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations.regulations. See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in this Annual Report for information regarding an environmental proceeding relating to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary.
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS Approximately 80%84%, 79%83% and 79%81% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, were to customers in the U.S. Approximately 97%98%, 97%96% and 96% of the Company’s long-lived assets were located in the U.S. at December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Other than the U.S., no one country accounts for more than 7%5% of consolidated net sales andor 5% of total assets. EMPLOYEES At December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had approximately 4,2004,500 employees. The Company is party to a labor contract with the International Machinists Union at its Colonial Heights, Virginia plant, which expires May 31, 2018. Internationally, the Company employs union employees in France, Mexico, Brazil and New Zealand. The Company believes that its relations with both its union and non-union employees are satisfactory.
CLASSES OF SIMILAR PRODUCTS The Company’s operations, exclusive of unconsolidated entities, constitute three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD. The table set forth below shows the percentage of the Company’s net sales contributed by each group of similar products marketed by the Company during 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014. | | % of Net Sales | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Consumer Domestic | | | | | | | | | | | | | Household Products | | | 46% | | | | 45% | | | | 45% | | Personal Care Products | | | 31% | | | | 31% | | | | 30% | | Consumer International | | | 15% | | | | 15% | | | | 16% | | Specialty Products | | | 8% | | | | 9% | | | | 9% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | % of Net Sales | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Consumer Domestic | | | | | | | | | | | | | Household Products | | | 45 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 47 | % | Personal Care Products | | | 30 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 25 | % | Consumer International | | | 17 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 19 | % | Specialty Products | | | 8 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 9 | % |
The table above reflects consolidated net sales, exclusive of net sales of unconsolidated entities.
PUBLIC INFORMATION The Company maintains a website at www.churchdwight.com and on the “Investors—Financial Information—SEC Filings” page of the website makes available free of charge the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files these materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on the “Investors—Corporate Governance” page on the Company’s website are the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for the Audit, Compensation & Organization and Governance & Nominating Committees of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Company’s Code of Conduct. Each of the foregoing is also available in print free of charge and may be obtained upon written request to: Church & Dwight Co., Inc., 500 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, attention: Secretary. The information presented inon the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report and the reference to the Company’s website is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.only.
The following risks and uncertainties, as well as othersother factors described elsewhere in this Annual Report or in other filings by the Company with the Commission, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition: Unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect demand for the Company’s products. Unfavorable and uncertain economic conditions have adversely affected, and in the future may adversely affect, demand for some of the categories of products the Company sells, resulting in reduced sales volume or market share or a shift in its product mix from higher margin to lower margin products. Factors that can affect demand include competitors’ products, advertising and pricing actions, rates of unemployment, consumer confidence, health care costs, including increased costs as a result of recent or future changes in federal regulations, commodity costs, fuel and other energy costs and other economic factors affecting consumer spending behavior, including delays in the timing of tax refunds from the federal government, gasoline and home heating oil pricing, reduced unemployment benefits in periods of high unemployment and tax increases. While the vast majority of the Company’s products generally are consumer staples that should begenerally are less vulnerable to decreases in discretionary spending than other products, they may become subject to increasing price competition as recessionary conditions continue. Moreover,competition. Additionally, some of the Company’s products, such as laundry additives, gummy dietary supplements and battery-operated toothbrushes, are more likely to be affected by consumer decisions to control spending. For example, recent deflation in dairy products, primarily milk, has adversely affected sales of our animal productivity products. Although we experienced a slight increase in demand for dairy products in the later part of 2016, the demand for dairy products may decline in the future and sales growth in that category may decline as a result. Some of the Company’s customers, including mass merchandisers, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores, wholesale clubs, home stores, and dollar, pet and other specialty stores, have experienced and may experience in the future declining financial performance, which could affect their ability to pay amounts due to the Company on a timely basis or at all. The Company regularly reviews the financial strength of its key customers and, where appropriate, modifies customer credit limits, which may have an adverse impact on future sales. Because the same economic conditions impactthat affect the Company also affect many of the Company’s suppliers, the Company also regularly conducts a similar review of its suppliers to assess both their financial viability and the importance of their products to Companythe Company’s operations. WhereWhen appropriate, the Company intends to identifyidentifies alternate sources of materials and services. To date, the Company has not experienced a material adverse impact from economic conditions affecting its customers or suppliers. However, a protracted economic downturn that adversely affects the Company’s suppliers and customers could adversely affect its sales and results of operations. operations. The Company faces intense competition in its markets, and the failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company faces increasingly intense competition from consumer products companies, both in the U.S. and in international markets. Most of the Company’s products compete with other widely-advertised brands within each product category and with private label brands and generic non-branded products of its customers in certain categories, which typically are sold at lower prices.prices. The Company’s products generally compete on the basis of product performance, brand recognition, price, value or other benefits to consumers. Consumer products are subject to significant price competition. As a result, the Company may need to reduce the prices for some of its products, or increase prices by an amount that does not cover manufacturing cost increases, to respond to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain market share. Any reduction in prices, or inability to raise prices sufficiently to cover manufacturing cost increases, would harm profit margins. In addition, if the Company’s sales volumes fail to grow sufficiently to offset any reduction in margins, its sales growth and other results of operations would suffer.suffer. Advertising, promotion, merchandising and packaging also have a significant impact on retail customer decisions regarding the brands and product lines they sell and on consumer purchasing decisions. A newly introduced consumer product (whether improved or newly developed) usually encounters intense competition requiring substantial expenditures for advertising, sales promotion and trade merchandising. If a product gains consumer acceptance, it normally requires continued advertising, promotional support and product improvements to maintain its relative market position. If the Company’s advertising, marketing and promotional programs are not effective, or adequate, its sales and volumegrowth may be impacted.decline. Many of the Company’s competitors are large companies, including P&G, The Sun Products Corporation, The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Henkel, AG & Co. KGaA, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc, Johnson & Johnson, Nestle Purina PetCare Company, Ansell Limited, Alere Inc., Pfizer Inc., Bayer AG, S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Pharmavite LLC and NBTY, Inc. Many of these companies have greater financial resources than does the Company, and, therefore, have the capacity to outspend the Company on advertising and promotional activities and introduce competing products more quickly and respond more effectively to changing business and economic conditions than can the Company. In addition, the Company’s competitors may attempt to gain market share by offering products at prices at or below those
typically offered by it. Competitive activity may require the Company to increase its spending on advertising and promotions and/or reduce prices, which could lead to reduced profits and adversely affect growth. If the Company loses market share andor the markets in which it competes do not grow substantially, its sales levels and operating resultsgrowth will decline.decline. Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has beenThere is significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category. For example, P&G markets a lower-priced line of laundry detergents, Simply Tide, which competes directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents. P&G has significantly increased its discounting of Simply Tide which could have a broad negative impact on the laundry category contributingpricing and profitability. In addition, in 2016, Henkel entered the premium laundry detergent segment with Persil, its leading worldwide premium laundry detergent and acquired Sun Products, making Henkel the second largest laundry detergent company in the U.S. While it is too early to an overall category decline. During 2012, the category declined 0.6%, and during 2013, the category declined an additional 3.2%. Whileassess what impact this will have on the Company’s laundry detergent sales havebusiness, the introduction of Persil and Henkel’s increased more than offsettingscale and market share could precipitate greater price competition in the category and distribution pressure with a potential adverse impact ofon the totalCompany’s laundry detergent business. Additionally, while the category grew 3.3% in 2016 (0.5% in the fourth quarter of 2016) after experiencing growth in 2015 and a decline in 2014, there is no assurance that the category will not decline further orin the future and that the Company will be able to offset any such category decline. Moreover, P&G, the market leader in premium laundry detergent, including unit dose laundry detergent, has recently reconfigured certain of its product offerings and related marketing and pricing strategies and launched various products to compete more directly with the Company’s core ARM & HAMMER and OXICLEAN power brands. In 2014, P&G is launching a lower-priced laundry detergent to compete directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents, is attempting to leverage its leadership position in unit dose laundry detergent with the introduction of a premium unit dose offering, and has launched a versatile stain remover, all of which are expected to be supported by aggressive trade spending and marketing. These actions, together with expected ongoing weak consumer spending and increased price competition, could negatively impact the Company’s laundry detergent and versatile stain remover businesses.
LossLoss of any of its principal customers could significantly decrease the Company’s sales and profitability.profitability.
A limited number of customers account for a large percentage of the Company’s net sales. Wal-Mart is the Company’s largest customer, accounting for approximately 24% of net sales in 2013,2016, 24% of net sales in 20122015 and 23%25% of net sales in 2011.2014. The Company’s top three customers accounted for approximately 35% of net sales in 2013, 34%2016, 35% of net sales in 20122015 and 33%36% of net sales in 2011. 2014. The Company expects that a significant portion of its net sales will continue to be derived from a small number of customers and that these percentages may increase if the growth of mass merchandisers continues. As a result, changes in the strategies of Wal-Mart or any of the Company’s other largest customers, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry or a shift of shelf space they dedicate to private label products, could materially harm the Company’s net sales and profitability.profitability. In addition, if the Company were to lose a significant customer due to customer service levels or real or perceived product quality or appearance issues, this could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company’s business is based primarily upon individual sales orders andas it rarely enters into long-term contracts with its customers.customers and most customer agreements include customer termination rights after short notice. Accordingly, these customers could reduce their purchasing levels or cease buying products from the Company at any time and for any reason. If the Company loses a significant customer or if sales of its products to a significant customer materially decrease, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.operations. Changes in the policies of the Company’s retailer customers and increasing dependence on key retailer customers in developed markets may adversely affect its business. In recent years, the Company has seen increasing retailer consolidation both in the U.S. and internationally.internationally has increased. This trend has resulted in the increased size and influence of large consolidated retailer customers, who may demand lower pricing, special packaging or impose other requirements on the Company. These business demands may relate to inventory practices, logistics or other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. Some of the Company’s customers, particularly its high-volume retail store customers, have sought to obtain pricing and other concessions orand better trade terms. To the extent the Company provides concessions or better trade terms to those customers, its margins are reduced. Further, if the Company is unable to effectively respond to the demands of its customers, these customers could reduce their purchases of Company products and increase their purchases of products from competitors, which would harm the Company’s sales and profitability. In addition, reductions in inventory by the Company’s customers, including as a result of consolidations in the retail industry, or these customers managing their working capital requirements, could result in reduced orders for Company products and adversely affect its results of operations for the financial periods affected by the reductions.reductions. Protracted unfavorable market conditions have caused many of the Company’s customers to more critically analyze the number of brands they sell, and reduce or discontinue certain of the Company’s product lines, particularly those products that were not number one or two in their category. If this continues to occur and the Company is unable to improve distribution for those products at other customers, its results could be adversely affected.affected. In addition, private label products sold by retail trade chains are typically sold at lower prices than branded products. As consumers look for opportunities to decrease discretionary spending, the Company’s customers have discontinued or reduced distribution of some of its products to encourage those consumers to purchase the customers’ less expensive and, in some cases, more profitable private label products (primarily in the dietary supplements, diagnostic kits and oral analgesics categories). To the extent customers discontinue or reduce distribution of the Company’s products or these products are adversely affected by customers’ actions to increase shelf space for their private label products, the Company will focus its efforts on improvingwould seek to improve distribution with other customers. However, if the Company’s efforts are not effective, its sales growth and other results, as well as its market share, could be adversely affected.
• | A continued shift in the retail market from food and drug stores to club stores, dollar stores and mass merchandisers, internet-based retailers and subscription services could cause the Company’s sales to decline. |
The Company’s performance depends upon the general health of the economy and of the retail environment in particular, and could be significantly harmed by changes affecting retailing and the financial difficulties of the Company’s retailer customers. Consumer products, such as those marketed by the Company, are increasingly being sold by club stores, dollar stores, mass merchandisers and mass merchandisers.internet-based retailers. Sales of the Company’s products remain strongest in the traditional mass merchandiser, food and drug channels of traderetail stores, and the Company’s products are increasingalso being sold in the club stores and dollar stores channels. Additionally, certain consumer products are now offered through internet-based subscription services or buying clubs. In 2016, Unilever acquired Dollar Shave Club, a subscription-based razor blade company, and in July 2016, P&G launched Tide Wash Club, an online subscription service for its unit-dose laundry detergent. Although the Company has taken steps to improve, and has seen improvement in, sales to club stores, [dollar stores] and dollar stores,internet-based retailers, and is engaged in e-commerce with respect to its TOPPIK and newly acquired VIVISCAL brands, if the current trend continues and the Company is not successful in further improving sales to these channels, its financial condition and operating results could suffer. suffer. Market category declines and changes to the Company’s product and geographic mix may impact the achievement of the Company’s sales growth targets, planned pricing and financial results. A significant percentage of the Company’s revenues comescome from mature markets that are subject to high levels of competition. During 2013,2016, approximately 80%84% of the Company’s sales were generated in U.S. markets. U.S. markets for consumer products are considered mature and commonly characterized by high household penetration, particularly with respect to the Company’s most significant product categories, such as laundry detergents, deodorizers, household cleaning products, toothpastes, dietary supplements, antiperspirants and deodorants. The Company’s ability to achieve unit sales growth in domestic markets will depend on increased use of its products by consumers relative to competitors’ products, its ability to drive growth through product innovation in existing and new product categories, investment in its established brands and enhanced merchandising and its ability to capture market share from its competitors. If the Company is unable to increase market share in existing product lines, develop product improvements, undertake sales, marketing and advertising initiatives that expand its product categories and develop, acquire or successfully launch new products, it may not achieve its sales growth objectives. Even if the Company is successful in increasing sales within its product categories, a continuing or accelerating decline in the overall markets for the Company’s products could have a negative impact on its financial results. results. Cost overruns and delays, regulatory requirements, and miscalculations in capacity needs with respect to the Company’s expansion projects and manufacturing facilities could adversely affect its business. TheFrom time to time, the Company initiates expansion projects from timewith respect to time. For example, the Companyits facilities. As is currently expanding its gummy vitamin production capacity at its York, Pennsylvania manufacturing facility to meet expected future product demand. The new gummy vitamin line is expected to start production in the first quarter of 2015. Projects of this typecustomary with large construction projects, these projects are subject to risks of, and the Company has from time to time experienced, delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project resulting from numerous factors, including the following: shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor; work stoppages; unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment; unanticipated cost increases; difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or in meeting permit conditions; difficulties in meeting regulatory or quality requirements or obtaining regulatory approvals; availability of suppliers to certify equipment for existing and enhanced regulations; design and engineering problems; and failure or delay of third party service providers, civil unrest and labor disputes. Significant cost overruns or delays in completing a project, or the miscalculations of our anticipated capacity needs could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s return on investment, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, ifIf the Company miscalculateswere to experience delays or cost overruns in the future it could result in product allocation and retailer frustration, the loss of a significant customer or customers, or if sales of any of its anticipated capacity needs,products were to materially decrease due to customer service levels or real or perceived product quality or appearance issues, this too could negatively impact its operations,have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, the supply of the Company’s products depends on the uninterrupted efficient operation of its manufacturing facilities and ability to meet customer service levels. Many of the Company’s manufacturing processes are complex and present difficult technical challenges to obtain the manufacturing yields necessary to operate profitably. In addition, the Company’s manufacturing processes may require complex and specialized equipment which can be expensive to repair or replace with required lead times of up to a year. The manufacturing of certain of the Company’s products is concentrated in one or more of its plants or contract manufacturers, with limited alternate facilities. Any event that negatively impacts manufacturing facilities, manufacturing systems or equipment, or contract manufacturers or suppliers could delay or suspend shipments of products or the release of new products or could result in the delivery of inferior products. The Company’s reliance on a limited number of suppliers, including sole source suppliers for certainrevenues from the affected products would decline and it could materially and adversely affectincur losses until such time as the Company or its contract manufacturers are able to restore production processes or are able to put in place alternative contract manufacturers or suppliers.
• | The Company’s reliance on a limited number of suppliers, including sole source suppliers for certain products, could materially and adversely affect its operations and financial results. |
The Company relies on a limited number of suppliers for certain of its commodities and raw materials, including sole source suppliers for certain of its raw materials, packaging, product components, finished products and other necessary supplies. New suppliers may have to be qualified under governmental, industry and Company standards, which can require additional investment and time. The Company may be unable to qualify any needed new suppliers or maintain supplier arrangements and relationships;relationships based on a variety of factors; it may be unable to contract with suppliers at the quantity, quality and price levels needed for its business; certain of its suppliers may not meet the standards of the Company’s customers or licensors; or certain of the Company’s key suppliers may become insolvent or experience other financial distress. If any of these events occurs and the Company has failed to identify and qualify an alternative vendor, then it may be unable to meet its contractual obligations and customer expectations, which could damage its reputation and result in lost customers and sales, or the Company may incur higher than expected expenses, either of which could materially and adversely affect its business, operations and results of operations. operations. Volatility and increases in the price of raw and packaging materials or energy costs could erode the Company’s profit margins, which could harm operating results, and efforts to hedge against raw material price increases may adversely affect the Company’s operating results if raw material prices decline. The principal raw materials and packaging used by the Company include surfactants (cleaning agents), paper products and resin-based molded components. Volatility and increases in the price of raw materials, or increases in the costs of energy, shipping and other necessary services, could significantly affect the Company’s profit margins if it is unable to pass along any higher costs in the form of price increases or otherwise achieve cost efficiencies, such as in manufacturing and distribution. Historically, the Company has attempted to address such price increases through cost reduction programs and price increases of its products, entering into pre-buying or locked-in pricing arrangements with certain suppliers and entering into hedge agreements. There is no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to fully offset any price increases, especially given the competitive environment. In addition, volatility in certain commodity markets could significantly affect the Company’s production cost and, therefore, harm its financial condition and operating results.results. TheFrom time to time, the Company uses hedge agreements to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges.prices. The hedge agreements are designed to add stability to product costs, enabling the Company to make pricing decisions and lessen the economic impact of abrupt changes in prices over the term of the contract. However, in periods of declining fuel prices, the hedge agreements can have the effect of locking the Company in at above-market prices.
prices. If new products and product line extensions do not gain widespread customer acceptance or are otherwise discontinued, or if they cause sales of existing products to decline, the Company’s financial performance could decline. The Company’s future performance and growth depends on its ability to successfully identify, develop and introduce new products and product line extensions. The Company cannot be certain that it will achieve its innovation goals. The successful development and introduction of new products involves substantial research, development, marketing and promotional expenditures, which the Company may be unable to recover if the new products do not gain widespread market acceptance. New product development and marketing efforts, including efforts to enter markets or product categories in which the Company has limited or no prior experience, have inherent risks. These risks include product development or launch delays, competitor actions, regulatory approval hurdles and the failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance. In addition, if sales generated by new products result in a concomitant decline in sales of existing products, the Company’s financial performance could be harmed.harmed. For example,Each year, the Company has been launching moreintroduces new products, including launches into new “white space” categories, than it has historically. In 2014,across the Company is expanding the OXICLEAN brand into three additional categories: premium laundry detergent, dishwashing detergent and bleach alternatives. In addition, the Company is launching new products across almost allmajority of its core businesses including a premium cat litter called ARM & HAMMER CLUMP & SEAL, amarketed brands. Historically, new premium toothpaste called ARM & HAMMER TRULY RADIANT, a new vitamin line forproduct acceptance has generally been widespread across the VITAFUSION brand, and new condoms, vibrators and lubricants under the TROJAN brand. While these new products have received strong distribution acceptance from the Company’s retailers to date, and will be supported by increased marketing spending, thereretailer base. There is no assurance, however, that the Company’s customers and consumers will continue to purchase these new products. If these new products are not successful in gaining market share,generating sales growth, the Company’s financial results could suffer.
From time to time, the Company has discontinued certain products and product lines, which resulted in returns from customers, asset write-offs and shutdown costs. The Company may suffer similar adverse consequences in the future to the extent it discontinues products that do not meet retailer or consumer expectations or no longer satisfy consumer demand. demand. Reduced availability of transportation or disruptions in our transportation network could adversely affect us. We distribute our products and receive raw materials and packaging components primarily by truck, rail and ship and through various ports of entry. Reduced availability of trucking, rail or shipping capacity due to adverse weather conditions, allocation of assets to other industries or geographies or otherwise, work stoppages, strikes or shutdowns of ports of entry or such transportation
sources, could cause us to incur unanticipated expenses and impair our ability to distribute our products or receive our raw materials or packaging components in a timely manner, which could disrupt our operations, strain our customer relationships and competitive position, and adversely affect our operating profits. If the reputation of one or more of the Company’s leading brands erodes, its financial results could suffer. The Company’s financial success is directly dependent on the reputation and success of its brands, particularly the ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN, L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION brands. The effectiveness of these brands could suffer if the Company’s marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand’s image or its ability to attract consumers. Further, the Company’s results could be adversely affected if one or more of its other leading brands suffers damage to its reputation due to real or perceived, sustainability, quality or safety issues.issues. Additionally, claims made in the Company’s marketing campaigns may become subject to litigation alleging false advertising, which, if successful, could cause the Company to alter its marketing plans and may materially and adversely affect sales or result in the imposition of significant damages against the Company, or other customer or consumer dissatisfaction, especially if such dissatisfaction were to be broadly disseminated, including through the use of social media. Widespread use of social media and networking sites by consumers has greatly increased the speed and accessibility of information dissemination. Negative or inaccurate posting or comments about the Company in the media or on any social networking website, or the disclosure of non-public sensitive information through social media, could generate adverse publicity that could damage the reputation of our brands. In addition, given the association of our individual products with the Company, an issue with one of our products could negatively affect the reputation of our other products, or the Company as a whole, thereby potentially adversely impacting the Company’s financial results. Product liability claims and withdrawals or recalls could adversely affect the Company’s sales and operating results and brand’s reputation.the reputation of the Company’s brands. From time to time, the Company is subject to product liability claims. The Company may be required to pay for losses or injuries actually or purportedly caused by its products, including losses or injuries caused by raw materials or other components provided by third party suppliers that are included in the Company’s products. Claims could be based on allegations that, among other things, the Company’s products contain contaminants, are improperly labeled or designed, or provide inadequate instructions regarding their use or inadequate warnings concerning interactions with other substances. Whether or not successful, product liability claims could result in negative publicity that could harm the Company’s sales and operating results and the reputation of its brands. In addition, if one of the Company’s products is found to be defective or non-compliant with applicable rules or regulations, it could be required to withdraw or recall it, which could result in adverse publicity and significant expenses. Although the Company maintains product liability and product recall insurance coverage, (that also covers product withdrawals), potential product liability claims and withdrawal and recall costs may exceed the amount of insurance coverage or may be excluded under the terms of the policy, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. condition. Environmental matters create potential liability risks. The Company must comply with various environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which it operates, including those relating to the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and the remediation of contamination associated with the use and disposal of hazardous substances. A release of such substances due to accident or an intentional act could result in substantial liability to governmental authorities or to third parties. The Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, capital and operating expenditures and other costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations. The Company currently is subject to environmental regulatory proceedings involving its Brazilian subsidiary, which has been fined the equivalent of approximately $2.1 million (at current exchange rates) in the proceedings. The Brazilian subsidiary is contesting the fine. In addition, the Company may be required to remove certain landfills in Brazil in connection with these proceedings, the cost of which is estimated to be in the range of $30 million to $50 million. It is possible that the Company could become subject to additionalother environmental remediation costs and liabilities in the future particularly with respect to its operations in Brazil, that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation, arbitration or regulatory matters where the outcome is uncertain and which could entail significant expense. The Company, in the ordinary course of its business is, and from time to time, may become, the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, government investigations and proceedings, including, without limitation, those relating to, commercial transactions, product liability, purported consumer class actions, employment matters, antitrust, environmental, health, safety and other compliance-related matters. Such proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of certain pending or threatened legal actions may not be reasonably predictable and any related damages may not be estimable. Certain pending or future legal actions, for example, the matter described under “Item 3 Legal Proceedings - Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc.” below, could
result in an adverse outcome for the Company, and any such adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Current and future laws and regulations in the countries in which the Company and its suppliers operate could expose the Company to increased costs and other adverse consequences. The manufacturing, processing, formulation (including stability), packaging, labeling, marketing, distribution and sale of the Company’s products are subject to regulation by federal agencies, including the FDA, the FCDA, the FTC, the United States Department of Agriculture, the EPA and the CPSC. In addition, the Company’s and its suppliers’ operations are subject to the oversight of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Labor Relations Board. The Company’s activities are also regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries in which its products are sold.sold. In particular, the FDA regulates the formulation, safety, manufacturing, packaging, labeling and distribution of condoms, home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, battery operated toothbrushes, over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements, including vitamins and minerals. The FDA also exercises oversight over cosmetic products such as depilatories. In addition, under a memorandum of understanding between the FDA and the FTC, the FTC has jurisdiction with regard to the promotion and advertising of these products, and the FTC regulates the promotion and advertising of the Company’s other products as well. As part of its regulatory authority, the FDA may periodically conduct inspections of the physical facilities, machinery, processes and procedures that the Company and its suppliers use to manufacture regulated products and may identify compliance issues that would require the Company and its suppliers to make certain changes in its manufacturing facilities and processes. The failure of a facility to be in compliance may lead to regulatory action against the products made in that facility, including seizure, injunction or recall, as well as to possible action against the owner of the facility/manufacturer. The Company may be required to make additional expenditures to address these issues or possibly stop selling certain products until the compliance issue has been remediated. As a result, the Company’s business could be adversely affected.affected. Likewise, any future determination by the FDA or a similar foreign agency, or by the Company in reviewing its compliance with applicable rules and regulations, that the Company’s products or quality systems do not comply with applicable regulations could result in future compliance activities, including product withdrawals or recalls, import detentions, injunctions preventing the shipment of products, or other enforcement actions. For example, the FDA may determine that a particular claim that the Company uses to support the marketing of a product is not substantiated, may not accept the evidence of safety for a new product that the Company may wish to market, may challenge the safety or effectiveness of existing products based on, among other things, changes in formulations, inadequate stability or “shelf-life,” consumer complaints, or improper labeling, and may determine that the Company’s dietary supplement business manufacturing, packaging, labeling and holding operations do not comply with cGMPs. Similarly, the Company may identify these or other issues in internal compliance reviews of its operations and the operations and products of vendors and acquired companies. These other issues may include the identification of contaminants or non-compliant levels of particular ingredients. Any of the foregoing could subject the Company to adverse publicity, force it to incur unanticipated costs and have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.operations. In addition, the Commission has promulgated finalfederally mandated rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding disclosure of the use of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, known as “conflict minerals”, in products manufactured by public companies. Certain of the Company’s products, including its diagnostic test kits and SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes, use these minerals sourced through third parties. The new rules require the Company to conduct due diligence to determine whether such minerals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo (the DRC) or an adjoining country and whether such minerals helped finance the armed conflict in the DRC. The Company’s first conflict minerals report required by the new rules is due by May 31, 2014 and annually thereafter. The Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including costs to determine the origin of minerals used in its products. In addition, the implementation of these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of such minerals used in the Company’s products. Also, the Company may face disqualification as a supplier for customers and reputational challenges, or may need to discontinue supply from its suppliers, if its due diligence procedures do not enable it to verify the origins for the minerals used in its products or determine that the minerals are conflict free.free. From time to time, Congress, the FDA, the FTC, the Commission or other federal, state, local or foreign legislative and regulatory authorities may impose additional laws or regulations that apply to the Company, repeal laws or regulations that the Company considers favorable, or impose more stringent interpretations of current laws or regulations. The new presidential administration is expected to introduce changes to the administration of federal regulatory agencies, including changes in policy and personnel at the FDA, the FTC and the Commission. The Company is not able to predict the nature of these changes or of such future laws, regulations, repeals or interpretations or to predict the effect additional or shifting governmental regulation, when and if it occurs, would have on its business in the future. Such developments could require reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, recalls or discontinuance of certain products not able to be reformulated, additional record-keeping requirements, increased documentation of the properties of certain products, additional or different labeling, additional scientific substantiation, expanded adverse event reporting or other new requirements. Any such developments could increase the Company’s costs significantly and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. operationsThe Company’s condom product line could suffer if the spermicide N-9 is proved or perceived to be harmful..
The Company’s distribution of condoms under the TROJAN brand and other trademarks is regulated by the FDA. Certain of the Company’s condoms, and similar condoms sold by its competitors, contain the spermicide nonoxynol-9 (“N-9”). Some interested groups have issued reports that N-9 should not be used rectally or for multiple daily acts of vaginal intercourse. In late 2008, the FDA issued final labeling guidance for latex condoms but excluded N-9 lubricated condoms from the guidance. While the Company awaits further FDA guidance on N-9 lubricated condoms, it believes that its present labeling for condoms with N-9 is compliant with the overall objectives of the FDA’s guidance, and that condoms with N-9 will remain a viable contraceptive choice for those couples who wish to use them. However, the Company cannot predict the nature of the labeling that ultimately will be required by the FDA. If the FDA or a state government eventually promulgates rules that prohibit or restrict the use of N-9 in condoms (such as new labeling requirements), the Company could incur costs from obsolete products, packaging or raw materials, and sales of condoms could decline, which, in turn, could decrease the Company’s earnings.
• | The Company is subject to risks related to its international operations that could adversely affect its results of operations. |
The Company’s international operations subject it to risks customarily associated with foreign operations, including: import and export license and taxation requirements and restrictions; trade restrictions, including local investment or exchange control regulations; changes in tariffs and taxes, including changes in trade policies following the recent federal election in the U. S. and geopolitical events generally; the effect of foreign income taxes, value-added taxes and withholding taxes, including the inability to recover amounts owed to the Company by foreign governments, and the determination of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “I.R.S.”) regarding the applicability of certain regulations, including the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, to the Company’s international transactions; the possibility of a new border adjustment tax by the new presidential administration; the possibility of expropriation, confiscatory taxation or price controls; obstacles to repatriating foreign profits back to the U.S.; political or economic instability, and civil unrest; disruptions in the global transportation network, such as work stoppages, strikes or shutdowns of ports of entry or such other transportation sources, or other labor unrest; compliance with laws and regulations concerning ethical business practices, including without limitations,limitation, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and United Kingdom Bribery Act; difficulty in enforcing contractual and intellectual property rights; regulatory requirements for certain products; and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations.operations; and Thesechanges to the Company’s cash contributions or other charges with respect to its pension plans covering certain of its international employees.
In addition, changes as result of the United Kingdom’s referendum approved by a majority of votes to exit the European Union could subject the Company to heightened risks in that region, including disruptions to trade and free movement of goods, services and people to and from the United Kingdom, increased foreign exchange volatility with respect to the British pound and additional legal and economic uncertainty. Moreover, following the 2016 U.S. presidential and congressional elections and the related transition to a new presidential administration, there may be shifts in U.S. foreign, trade, economic and other policies that may materially affect our foreign operations and our ability to market our products in certain international markets. All of the foregoing risks could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to commercialize its products on a competitive basis in international markets and may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial position. In all foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates, it is subject to laws and regulations that govern foreign investment, foreign trade and currency exchange transactions. In addition,The Company’s business is exposed to domestic and foreign currency fluctuations that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Approximately 16% of the Company’s net sales were to customers outside the U.S. in 2016. The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk (both transaction and translation) with respect to its sales, profits, assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Outside of the U.S., sales and costs are denominated in a variety of currencies, including the Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound, Brazilian Real, Canadian Dollar, Mexican Peso, Chinese Yuan and Australian Dollar. A weakening of the currencies in which sales are generated relative to the currencies in which costs are denominated would decrease operating profits and cash flow. TheChanges in currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at which the Company purchases materials and services in foreign markets. Although the Company, from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in the U.S. Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound and Euro. Euro, foreign currency fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
• | The failure of the Company to expand in existing geographic locations or enter new geographic locations could have a material adverse effect on the growth of the Company’s business, sales and results of operations. |
The Company’s ability to continue to grow its sales and profits is dependent on expanding in the locations in which it already does business and entering into new geographic locations, both of which would require significant resources and investments which would affect the Company’s risk profile. The failure to successfully enter into or expand its business in such locations could materially affect the growth of the Company’s business, sales and results of operations. The Company may not be able to continue to identify and complete strategic acquisitions and effectively integrate acquired companies to achieve desired financial benefits. The Company seeks to acquire or invest in businesses that offer products, services or technologies that are complementary. The Company has made eight12 acquisitions in the past ten13 years, including the following brands: SPINBRUSH battery-powered toothbrushes; OXICLEAN, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products; ORAJEL oral analgesics; SIMPLY SALINE nasal moisturizers; TOOTH TUNES musical toothbrushes; FELINE PINE natural cat litter; BATISTE dry shampoo andshampoo; L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION dietary supplements.supplements; REPHRESH and REPLENS feminine care products; VI-COR, feed ingredients for dairy cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock , TOPPIK, a leading brand of hair building fibers for people with thinning hair, in December 2016, ANUSOL and RECTINOL, hemorrhoid products and in January 2017, VIVISCAL, a non-drug hair growth supplement. The Company may make additional acquisitions or substantial investments in complementary businesses or products in the future. Those acquisitions may be significantly larger than the ones completed in the past and may require the Company to increase its levels of debt, potentially resulting in the Company being assigned a lower credit rating. However, the Company may not be able to identify and successfully negotiate suitable strategic acquisitions at attractive valuations, obtain financing for future acquisitions on satisfactory terms or otherwise complete future acquisitions. In recent periods, competition from other consumer products companies that are seeking similar opportunities has been particularly strong, and valuations for potential acquisition assets have been high, which has placed pressure on the Company’s ability to identify, structure and execute transactions. In addition, all acquisitions and investments entail various risks, including the difficulty of entering new markets or product categories, the challenges of integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses or products, the potential disruption of the Company’s ongoing business and the ongoing business of the acquired company, the need to review and, if necessary, upgrade processes of the acquired company to conform to the Company’s own processes and applicable legal and regulatory requirements, and, generally, the Company’s potential inability to obtain the desired financial and strategic benefits from the acquisition or investment. Any of these risks may divert management and other resources, require the Company to incur unanticipated costs or delay the anticipated positive impact on the Company’s business and results of the acquisition. The risks associated with assimilation are increased to the extent the Company acquires businesses that have stand-alone operations that cannot easily be integrated or operations or sources of supply outside of the U.S. and Canada, for which products are manufactured locally by third parties. These factors could harm the Company’s financial condition and operating results.results. Acquired companies or operations or newly-created ventures may not be profitable or may not achieve sales levels and profitability that justify the investments made. In addition, future acquisitions or investments could result in substantial cash expenditures, the potentially dilutive issuances of new equity by the Company or the incurrence of additional debt or contingent liabilities, all of which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. In addition, any potential acquisitions or investments, whether or not ultimately completed, could divert the attention of management and resources from other matters that are critical to the Company’s operations. operations. The Company relies significantly on information technology. Any inadequacy, interruption, theft or loss of data, malicious attack, integration failure, failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on our systems or other security failure of that technology could harm the Company’s ability to effectively operate its business and damage the reputation of its brands. The Company relies extensively on information technology systems, some of which are managed by third-party service providers, to conduct its business. These systems include, but are not limited to, programs and processes relating to internal communications and communications with other parties, ordering and managing materials from suppliers, converting materials to finished products, shipping product to customers, billing customers and receiving and applying payment, processing transactions, summarizing and reporting results of operations, complying with regulatory, legal or tax requirements, collecting and storing customer, consumer, employee, investor, and other stakeholder information and personal data, and other processes necessary to manage the Company’s business. In addition, the Company is engaged in e-commerce with respect to its TOPPIK brand and the recently acquired VIVISCAL brand. Increased information technology security threats and more sophisticated computer crime, including advanced persistent threats, pose a potential risk to the security of the Company’s information technology systems, networks, and services of the Company, its customers and
other business partners, as well as the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of the Company’s data. Thedata of the Company, its customers and other business partners. As a result, the Company’s information technology systems, networks or service providers could be damaged or cease to function properly or the Company could suffer a loss or disclosure of business, personal or stakeholder information, due to any number of causes, including catastrophic events, power outages and security breaches. Although the Company has business continuity plans in place and has implemented a breach response plan to address service interruptions, if these business continuity plans do not provide effective alternative processes on a timely basis, the Company may suffer interruptions in its ability to manage or conduct its operations which may adversely affect its business. The Company cannot guarantee that its security efforts will prevent attacks and resulting breaches or breakdowns of the Company’s, or its third-party service providers’ databases or systems since the techniques used in these attacks change frequently and may be difficult to detect for periods of time. In addition, although we have policies and procedures in place governing the secure storage of personal information collected by the Company or its third-party service providers, data breaches due to human error or intentional or unintentional conduct may occur in the future. The Company may need to expend additional resources in the future to continue to protect against, or to address problems caused by any business interruptions or data security breaches. Any business interruptions or data security breaches, including cyber security breaches resulting in private data disclosure of personal data, could result in lawsuits or regulatory proceedings, damage the Company’s reputation or adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. Further, negative postings or comments about In addition, the Company on any social networking websitefrom time to time needs to upgrade its information technology systems. If a new system does not function properly, it could damage its reputation, asaffect our ability to order supplies, process and deliver customer orders and process and receive payments for our products. This could the disclosureadversely impact our results of non-public sensitive information through social media. operations and cash flows. The Company’s substantial indebtedness and its financial covenants could adversely affect its operations and financial results and prevent it from fulfilling its obligations, and the Company may incur substantially more debt in the future, which could exacerbate these risks. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had approximately $803.4$1,120 million of total consolidated indebtedness.indebtedness net of debt issuance costs. This amount of indebtedness could have important consequences, including: making it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its cash obligations; limiting the Company’s ability to fund potential acquisitions; requiring the Company to dedicate a portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of cash flow to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes; limiting the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, general adverse economic conditions or changes in its business and the industry in which it operates; and placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt. Additionally, the Company’s credit facility is subject to certain financial and other customary covenants. In addition,the event of a breach of those covenants, our lenders under the credit facility may be entitled to accelerate the related debt (and any lenders in respect of any other debt to which a cross-default provision applies may be entitled to accelerate such other debt), and we could be required to seek amendments or waivers under the debt instruments or to refinance the debt. Moreover, the Company may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, to repurchase shares or to fund other activities for general business purposes. If new debt is added to the current debt levels, the related risks that the Company now faces could intensify. A substantial increase in the Company’s indebtedness could also have a negative impact on the Company’s credit rating. In this regard, failure to maintain the Company's credit ratings could adversely affect the interest rate available to the Company in future financings, as well as the Company’s liquidity, competitive position and access to capital markets. Any decision regarding future borrowings will be based on the facts and circumstances existing at the time, including market conditions and the Company’s credit rating. rating. The Company may not have sufficient cash flow to service its indebtedness or fund capital expenditures. The Company’s ability to repay and refinance its indebtedness and to fund capital expenditures depends primarily on its cash flow. Cash flow is often subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond the Company’s control, and such factors may limit its ability to repay indebtedness and fund capital expenditures. A failure to service its indebtedness or obtain additional financing as needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. condition.
• | There can be no guarantee that the Company will continue to make dividend payments or repurchase the Common Stock at sustained levels or at all. |
Although the Board has recently authorized new share repurchase programs in each of 2014, 2015 and 2016 and recently increased the amount of the quarterly cash dividends payable on the Common Stock, any Board determinations to continue to repurchase the Common Stock or to continue to pay cash dividends on the Common Stock, in each case at levels consistent with recent practice or at all, will be based primarily upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, business requirements, price of the Common Stock in the case of the repurchase programs, and the Board’s continuing determination that the repurchase programs and the declaration of dividends under the dividend policy are in the best interests of Company stockholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements applicable to the repurchase and dividend programs. In the event the Company does not declare a quarterly dividend, or discontinues its share repurchases, its stock price could be adversely affected. affected. Recent volatilityVolatility in the financial markets may negatively impact the Company’s ability to access the credit markets.
In recentOver the years, the banking system and financial markets have experienced severe disruption, including, among other things, bank failures and consolidations, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades, declines in asset valuations and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These conditions present the following risks to the Company, among others:
The Company is dependent on the continued viability of the financial institutions that participate in the syndicate that is generally obligated to fund the Company’s $500 million$1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility dated November 18, 2010December 4, 2015 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). In addition, the Credit Agreement includes a “commitment increase” feature that enables the Company to increase the amount of its borrowing under the Credit Agreement, subject to lending commitments and certain conditions. Any disruption in the credit markets could limit the availability of credit or the ability or willingness of financial institutions to extend credit, which could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and capital resources. The Company’s short- and long-term credit ratings affect its borrowing costs and access to financing. A downgrade in the Company’s credit ratings, as a result of a substantial increase in the Company’s indebtedness or otherwise, would increase its borrowing costs and could affect its ability to issue commercial paper. Disruptions in the commercial paper market or other effects of volatile economic conditions on the credit market also could raise the Company’s borrowing costs for both short- and long-term debt offerings. Either scenario could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and capital resources. Failure to maintain the Company’s credit ratings could adversely affect the interest rate in future financings, liquidity, competitive position and access to capital markets. Although the Company believes that its operating cash flows, together with its access to the credit markets, provides it with significant discretionary funding capacity, the inability of one or more institutions to fulfill funding obligations under the Credit Agreement could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and operations. operations. Changes in tax laws and regulations or in the Company’sour operations may impact the Company’s effective tax rate and may adversely affect its earningsour business, financial condition and cash flow.operating results. The Company’s future effective tax rate could be affected by changes in tax laws and regulations or their interpretation, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, or changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The realization of deferred income tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If the actual amount of the Company’s future taxable income is less than the amount it is currently projecting with respect to specific tax jurisdictions, or if there is a change in the time period within which the deferred tax asset becomes deductible, the Company could be required to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The recording of a valuation allowance would result in an increase in the Company’s effective tax rate, and would have an adverse effect on its operating results. In addition, changes in statutory tax rates may change the Company’s deferred tax assets or liability balances, which would have either a favorable or unfavorable impact on its effective tax rate.rate. Additionally, reform proposals put forth by members of the U.S. Congress and the new presidential administration have introduced greater uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs and government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the disallowance of tax deductions for imported merchandise or the imposition of unilateral tariffs on imported products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity. Resolutions of tax disputes may adversely affect the Company’s earnings and cash flow. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s effective tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions. The Company provides for uncertain tax positions with respect to tax positions that do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards mandated by applicable accounting guidance. Fluctuations in federal, state, local and foreign taxes or changes to uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, may impact the Company’s effective tax rate and its financial results. The
Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities, and although the Company believes its tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation could be materially different than that reflected in its historical income tax provisions and accruals. In addition, when particular tax matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable resolution of any tax matter could increase the effective tax rate. Any resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. resolution. Additionally, adverse outcomes from tax audits that we may be subject to in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate, could result in an unfavorable change in our effective tax rate, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Failure to effectively utilize or successfully assert intellectual property rights, and the loss or expiration of such rights, could materially adversely affect the Company’s competitiveness. Infringement by the Company of third-party intellectual property rights could result in costly litigation and/or the modification or discontinuance of Company products. The market for the Company’s products depends to a significant extent upon the value associated with its trademarks and brand names, including ARM & HAMMER, TROJAN, OXICLEAN, L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION. The Company owns the material trademarks and brand names used in connection with the marketing and distribution of its major products both in the U.S. and in other countries. In addition, the Company holds several valuable patents on its products, which the Company believes serve as an effective barrier to entry for new competitors. Accordingly, the Company relies on trademark, trade secret, patent and copyright laws to protect its intellectual property rights. Although most of the Company’s material intellectual property is registered in the U.S. and in certain foreign countries in which it operates, it cannot be sure that its intellectual property rights will be effectively utilized or, if necessary, successfully asserted. There is a risk that the Company will not be able to obtain and perfect its own intellectual property rights, or, where appropriate, license from others intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. The Company cannot be sure that these rights, if obtained, will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the future, and the Company could incur significant costs in connection with legal actions relating to such rights. In addition, even if such rights are obtained in the U.S., the laws of some of the other countries in which the Company’s products are or may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. If other parties infringe the Company’s intellectual property rights, they may dilute the value of the Company’s brands in the marketplace, which could diminish the value that consumers associate with the Company’s brands and harm its sales. The Company’s failure to perfect or successfully assert intellectual property rights could make it less competitive and could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and financial condition. Also, the Company’s patents are granted for a term of 20 years from the date the patent application is filed. While theThe Company considers nodoes not consider any single patent to be material to the business as a whole it does recognize that the loss of key patents will allow for increased competition, specifically to its SPINBRUSH battery-powered toothbrush, FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kit and ANSWER pregnancy test kit brands.. In addition, if the Company’s products are found to infringe intellectual property rights of others, the owners of those rights could bring legal actions against the Company claiming substantial damages for past infringement and seeking to enjoin manufacturing and marketing of the affected products. If these legal actions are successful, in addition to any potential liability for damages from past infringement, the Company could be required to obtain a license in order to continue to manufacture or market the affected products, potentially adding significant costs. The Company might not prevail in any action brought against it or it may be unsuccessful in securing any license for continued use and therefore have to discontinue the marketing and sale of a product. This could make the Company less competitive and could have a material adverse impact on its business, operating results and financial condition.condition. Impairment of the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets may result in a reduction in net income. The Company has a material amount of goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets, as well as other long-lived assets, which are periodically evaluated for impairment in accordance with current accounting standards. Declines in the Company’s profitability and/or estimated cash flows related to specific intangible assets, as well as potential changes in market valuations for similar assets and market discount rates, has resulted in impairment charges from time to time, and may result in anfuture impairment charge,charges, which could reduce the Company’s net income and otherwise have an adverse impact on operating results. The Company’s operations and the operations of its third party manufacturers, suppliers and customers may be subject to disruption from events beyond its or their control. The Company’s operations, as well as the operations of its third party manufacturers, suppliers and customers, may be subject to disruption from a variety of causes, including work stoppages, material shortages, financial difficulties, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. If a major disruption were to occur, it could result in harm to people or the natural environment, delays in shipments of products to customers or suspension of operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. business.
• | The Company may not be able to attract, retain and develop key personnel. |
The Company’s future performance depends in significant part upon the continued service of its executive officers and other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. This effect could be exacerbated if any officers or other key personnel left as a group or at the same time. The Company’s success also depends, in part, on its continuing ability to attract, retain and develop highly qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company can retain its key employees or attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.future. We have a limited number of authorized shares of our Common Stock available for future issuance. Currently, approximately 2% of the authorized number of shares of our Common Stock remain available for issuance under our restated certificate of incorporation. Under Delaware law, stockholder approval is required in order to amend our restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. We anticipate including such a proposal for consideration at our next annual meeting of stockholders; however, we cannot provide any assurances that our stockholders will approve that proposal. If our stockholders do not approve such an amendment to our restated certificate of incorporation, we may be unable to take timely advantage of market conditions and issue common stock for a variety of purposes, including stock splits or other recapitalizations, acquisitions and other business development transactions and strategic growth initiatives, equity financings, grants of stock options and other equity-based instruments, and other corporate purposes. ITEMITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED
| UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Not applicable. The Company leases itsa 250,000 square foot corporate headquarters building in Ewing, New Jersey. The facility became the Company’sJersey for its global headquarters office in January 2013 and is fully occupied.corporate headquarters. The lease will expireexpires in 2032,2033, subject to two ten-year extension terms at the option of the Company. The Company’s aggregate lease commitment is approximately $116$95 million over the remainder of the lease term.term. In conjunction with its lease of the headquarters building in Ewing,addition, the Company vacated three leased facilities in Princeton that contain approximately 140,000 square feet of office space under three leases, two of which expire in 2014 and will not be renewed, and one of which expires in 2022. These leased facilities are adjacent to the Company’s former headquarters, which is owned by the Company and includes approximatelyowns a 127,000 square feet of office space, and will continue to befacility in Princeton, New Jersey which is occupied by the Company’s research and development and SPD personnel. The Company also owns a 36,000 square foot research and development facility in Cranbury, New Jersey. The Company also leases offices in various locations throughout the U.S., Brazil and China.globally. The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries also own or lease other facilities as set forth in the following table: Location | | Products Manufactured | | Segment | | | | Approximate Area (Sq. Feet) | LocationOwned:
| | Products Manufactured
| | Segment
| | Approximate
Area (Sq. Feet) | | Owned:Manufacturing facilities
| | | | | | | | | Manufacturing facilities
| | | | | | | | | York, Pennsylvania | | Liquid laundry detergent, dietary supplements and cat litter | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 450,000 | | Harrisonville, Missouri | | Liquid laundry detergent and fabric softener | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 272,000 | | Green River, Wyoming | | Sodium bicarbonate and various consumer products | | Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD | | | 250,000 | | Lakewood, New Jersey | | Various consumer products | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 250,000 | | Colonial Heights, Virginia | | Condoms | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 220,000 | | Old Fort, Ohio | | Sodium bicarbonate, rumen bypass fats and various consumer products | | Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD | | | 208,000 | | Montreal, Canada | | Personal care products | | Consumer International | | | 157,000 | | Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil | | Sodium bicarbonate and other products | | SPD | | | 120,000 | | Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil(1) | | | | SPD | | 106,000 |
Folkestone, England | | | | SPD | | | 106,000 | | Folkestone, England
| | Personal care products | | Consumer International | | | 78,000 | | Madera, California | | Rumen bypass fats and related products | | SPD | | | 50,000 | | Itapura, Bahia, Brazil(1) | | Barite | | SPD | | | 35,000 | | New Plymouth, New Zealand(2) | | Condom processing | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 31,000 | | Oskaloosa, Iowa | | Animal nutritionproductivity products | | SPD | | | 27,000 | | Warehouses
| | | | | | | Warehouses | | | | | | | York, Pennsylvania | | — | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 650,000 | | Harrisonville, Missouri | | — | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 282,000 | | Green River, Wyoming | | — | | Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD | | | 215,000 | | Old Fort, Ohio | | — | | Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD | | | 90,000 | | Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil | | — | | SPD | | | 39,200 | | Itapura, Bahia, Brazil | | — | | SPD | | | 19,600 | | Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil | | — | | SPD | | | 13,100 | | Leased:
| | | | | | | | | Manufacturing facilitiesLeased:
| | | | | | | | | North Brunswick, New Jersey(2)Manufacturing facilities
| | — | | | | | 360,000 | | | | | | | | | Vancouver, Washington(3)(3) | | Dietary supplements | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 206,000 | | Victorville, California(4)(4) | | Liquid laundry detergent and cat litter | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 150,000 | | Mason City, Iowa(5) | | Animal productivity products | | SPD | | 36,000 | Folkestone, England(5)(6) | | Personal care products | | Consumer International | | | 22,000 | | Warehouses
| | | | | | | | | Warehouses | | | | | | | Fostoria, Ohio(6)(7) | | — | | Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD | | | 486,000 | | Victorville, California(4)(4) | | — | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 300,000 | | Grandview, Missouri(7)(8) | | — | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 250,000 | 125,000 | Ridgefield, Washington(3)(3) | | — | | Consumer Domestic and Consumer International | | | 190,000 | | Mississauga, Canada(8)(9) | | — | | Consumer International | | | 123,000 | | Mason City, Iowa(5) | | | | SPD | | 64,000 | Folkestone, England(9)(10) | | — | | Consumer International | | | 55,000 | | Revel, France | | — | | Consumer International | | | 48,900 | | Sydney, Australia
| | — | | Consumer International | | | 24,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | LocationOffices(13)
| | Products Manufactured
| | Segment
| | Approximate
Area (Sq. Feet) | | Offices
| | | | | | | | | Mexico City, Mexico | | — | | Consumer International | | | 27,500 | | Levallois, France | | — | | Consumer International | | | 21,600 | | Mississauga, Canada | | — | | Consumer International | | | 17,000 | | Folkestone, England(11) | | — | | Consumer International | | 11,000 | Sydney, Australia(12) | | — | | Consumer International | | 24,900 | | | | | | | |
(10)(1)
| | — | | Consumer International | | | 11,000 | |
(1) | Manufacturing site is idle, and virtually all manufacturing equipment has now been removed. |
(2) | LeaseLand lease expires in September 2015. The Company has subleased this building through the end of the lease term.March 2025. |
(3) | There are a total of seven buildings in Vancouver, Washington and one building in Ridgefield, Washington dedicated to the Company’s dietary supplements business. All leases have an expiration date of December 2020, except for the building in |
| Ridgefield (March 2018)2018, subject to a 33-month extension at the option of the Company) and one building in Vancouver (August 2017)(December 2017, subject to three one-year extensions, at the option of the Company). |
(4) | Lease expires in April 2024, subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company. |
(5) | There are three buildings in Mason City, Iowa dedicated to the Company’s Animal Productivity business. One lease, for two buildings, has an expiration date of November 2019, subject to three five-year extensions at the option of the Company. The lease for the other building has an expiration date of November 2024, subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company. |
(6) | Lease expires in April 2022, subject to a break option in 2017. |
(6)(7) | Lease expires in November 2015,2019. |
(8) | Lease consists of one suite (approximately 125,000 sq. feet). The lease expires in May 2019. The lease is subject to one four-yeartwo -year extension at the option of the Company. |
(7)(9) | Lease consists of two suites (each approximately 125,000 sq. feet). One suite expires in May 2015 and the other in May 2016. The lease is subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company. |
(8) | Lease expires in September 2022, subject to two five-year extensions at the option of the Company. |
(9)(10) | There are two leased warehouses in Folkestone, England. One lease expires in March 2028, with break options every five years. The second lease expires in September 2014.April 2022, subject to a break option in April 2017. |
(10)(11) | Lease expires in November 2024, subject to a break option in December 2020. |
(12) | Lease expires in June 2020, subject to a six-year extension at the option of the Company. |
(13) | We also lease offices in Brazil, China, London, Los Angeles, Panama, Singapore and Taiwan. |
In Syracuse, New York, the Company owns a 21 acre site which includes a group of connected buildings. This facility was closed in 2001 and a portion of the facility is now leased to a third party. Armand, a joint venture in which the Company owns a 50% interest, operates a potassium carbonate manufacturing plant located in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. This facility contains approximately 53,000 square feet of space and has a production capacity of 103,000 tons of potassium carbonate per year. The Company’s 99.8% owned Brazilian subsidiary, QGN, has its administrative headquarters in Rio de Janeiro.
The Old Fort, Ohio plant has a production capacity for sodium bicarbonate of 280,000 tons per year. The Green River, Wyoming plant has a production capacity for sodium bicarbonate of 200,000 tons per year. The Company believes that its operating and administrative facilities are adequate and suitable for the conduct of its business. The Company also believes that its production facilities are suitable for current manufacturing requirements for its consumer and specialty products businesses. In addition, with the exception of gummy vitamin dietary supplements, the facilities possess a capacity sufficient to accommodate the Company’s estimated increases in production requirements over the next several years, based on its current product lines. The Company is currently expanding its gummy vitamin dietary supplements production capacity at its York, Pennsylvania manufacturing facility to meet expected future product demand. The new gummy vitamin line is expected to start production in the first quarter of 2015. ITEMITEM 3.
| LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
General The Company, in the ordinary course of its business is the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions. Litigation isactions, government investigations and proceedings from time to time, including, without limitation, those relating to, commercial transactions, product liability, purported consumer class actions, employment matters, antitrust, environmental, health, safety and other compliance related matters. Such proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of certain individual litigated matterspending or threatened legal actions may not be reasonably predictable and any related damages may not be estimable. Some litigation matters,Certain legal actions, including those described below, could result in an adverse outcome for the Company, and any such adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.flows.
Brazil Environmental MattersScantibodies Laboratory, Inc
In 2000, the Company acquired majority ownership in its Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral do Nordeste S.A. (“QGN”). The acquired operations included an inorganic salt manufacturing plant which began site operations in the late 1970’s. Located on the site were two closed landfills, two active landfills and a pond for the management of the process waste streams. In 2009, QGN was advised by the environmental authority in the State of Bahia, the Institute of the Environment (“IMA”), that the plant was discharging contaminants into an adjacent creek. After learning of the discharge, QGN took immediate action to cease the discharge and retained two nationally recognized environmental firms to prepare a site investigation / remedial action plan (“SI/RA”). The SI/RA report was submitted by QGN to IMA in April 2010. The report concluded that the likely sources of the discharge were the failure of the pond and closed landfills. QGN ceased site operations in August 2010. In November 2010, IMA responded to QGN’s recommendation for an additional study by issuing a notification requiring a broad range of remediation measures (the “Remediation Notification”), which included the shutdown and removal of two on-site landfills. In addition, despite repeated discussions with IMA at QGN’s request to consider QGN’s proposed remediation alternatives, in December 2010, IMA imposed a fine of five million Brazilian Real (approximately U.S. $2.1 million at current exchange rates) for the discharge of contaminants above allowable limits. The description of the fine included a reference to aggravating factors that may indicate that local “management’s intent” was considered in determining the severity of the fine, which could result in criminal liability for members of local management. In January 2011, QGN filed with IMA an administrative defense to the fine, suspending any enforcement activities pending its defense. IMA has not yet formally responded to QGN’s administrative defense.
With respect to the Remediation Notification, QGN engaged in discussions with IMA during which QGN asserted that a number of the remediation measures, including the removal of the landfills, and the timeframes for implementation were not appropriate and requested that the Remediation Notification be withdrawn. In response, in February 2011, IMA issued a revised Remediation Notification (the “Revised Remediation Notification”) providing for further site analysis by QGN, including further study of the integrity of the landfills. The Revised Remediation Notification did not include a requirement to remove the landfills; however, it did not foreclose the possibility of such requirement. QGN has responded to the Revised Remediation Notification providing further information regarding the remediation measures, and is in discussions with the Institute of Environment and Waste Management (“INEMA”), successor to IMA, to seek agreement on an appropriate remediation plan. In mid-2011, QGN, consistent with the Revised Remediation Notice, began an additional site investigation and capped the two active landfills. In 2012, QGN drained the waste pond. During the third quarter of 2013, INEMA approved, in writing, the first step in QGN’s proposed remediation plans, the installation of a trench drain to capture and treat groundwater at the site. QGN expects to begin construction of the trench drain in early 2014 and to continue discussions with INEMA concerning the resolution of the fine.
As a result of the foregoing events, the Company accrued approximately $3 million in 2009 and $4.8 million in 2010 for remediation, fines and related costs. Since 2009, the costs of remediation activities and foreign exchange rate changes have reduced the accrual by approximately $3.8 million, to a current amount of $4.0 million. As a result of INEMA’s approval of the first step in QGN’s remediation plans, the Company does not believe that it will be required to remove the landfills. However, it remains reasonably possible that INEMA will require such removal, and the Company could be unsuccessful in appealing such decision. The Company estimates the cost of such landfill removal would be in the range of $30 million to $50 million.
ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in a purported classbreach of contract action lawsuit alleging unfair, deceptive and unlawful business practices with respect to the advertising, marketing and sales of ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant. Specifically,filed by Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc. (the “Plaintiff”) on March 9, 2012, Plaintiffs Stephen Trewin and Joseph Farhatt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed a complaint against the CompanyApril 1, 2014, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Jersey alleging violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and breach of implied warranty. York. The original complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company uses a marketing(i) breached two agreements for the manufacture and advertising campaign that is centered aroundsupply of pregnancy and ovulation test kits by switching suppliers, (ii) failed to give Plaintiff the claim thatproper notice, (iii) failed to reimburse Plaintiff for costs and expenses under the ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant is a “natural” product that contains “natural” ingredientsagreements and provides “natural” protection.(iv) misrepresented its future requirements. The complaint alleges that the advertisingseeks compensatory and marketing campaign is false and misleading because the product contains artificial and synthetic ingredients. Among other things, the complaint seeks an order certifying the case as a class action, appointing Plaintiffs as class representatives and appointing Plaintiffs’ counsel to represent the class. The complaint also seeks restitution and disgorgement of all amounts obtained by the Company as a result of the alleged misconduct; compensatory, actual, statutory and other unspecified damages allegedly suffered by Plaintiffs and the purported class; up to treble damages for alleged violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act; punitive damages for alleged violationsin an amount in excess of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act; an order requiring the Company to immediately cease its alleged wrongful conduct; an order requiring the Company to engage in a corrective notice campaign; an order requiring the Company to pay to Plaintiffs and all members of the purported class the amounts paid for ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant;$20 million, as well as declaratory relief, statutory prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest; and, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On May 14, 2012, theThe Company filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint. On December 10, 2012, the Court issued an order granting the Company’s motion and dismissed the original complaint without prejudice. On January 7, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking relief similar to that sought in the original complaint, but excluding the breach of implied warranty claim.
In January 2014, the case was settled for an immaterial amount, and the settlement is subject to Court approval. If the Court fails to approve the settlement, the Company will continue to vigorously defenddefending itself in this matter. WhileOn June 16, 2014, the Company filed an amended answer to the complaint denying all of the Plaintiff’s material allegations. The parties have been engaged in fact and expert discovery, which is ongoing.
In connection with this matter, the Company has reserved an immaterial amount. Although any damages ultimately paid by the Company may exceed this amount, it is not currently possible to estimate the amount of any damages or determine the impact ofsuch excess; however, any equitable relief that may be granted if the litigation continues and if there is an adverse outcome, such an outcomeexcess could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. ITEMITEM 4.
| MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.applicable.
PARTPART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Common Stock Price Range and Dividends | | Low | | | High | | | Dividend | | | Low | | | High | | | Dividend | | 1st Quarter | | $ | 53.80 | | | $ | 64.69 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 44.21 | | | $ | 49.74 | | | $ | 0.24 | | 2nd Quarter | | $ | 58.91 | | | $ | 65.10 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 49.16 | | | $ | 55.50 | | | $ | 0.24 | | 3rd Quarter | | $ | 56.36 | | | $ | 65.49 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 50.62 | | | $ | 59.27 | | | $ | 0.24 | | 4th Quarter | | $ | 59.00 | | | $ | 66.96 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 49.59 | | | $ | 55.42 | | | $ | 0.24 | | Full Year | | $ | 53.80 | | | $ | 66.96 | | | $ | 1.12 | | | $ | 44.21 | | | $ | 59.27 | | | $ | 0.96 | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Common Stock Price Range and Dividends | | Low | | | High | | | Dividend | | | Low | | | High | | | Dividend | | 1st Quarter | | $ | 38.42 | | | $ | 46.36 | | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 38.70 | | | $ | 43.33 | | | $ | 0.17 | | 2nd Quarter | | $ | 45.10 | | | $ | 53.68 | | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 40.41 | | | $ | 43.63 | | | $ | 0.17 | | 3rd Quarter | | $ | 46.63 | | | $ | 52.28 | | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 40.61 | | | $ | 45.37 | | | $ | 0.17 | | 4th Quarter | | $ | 42.56 | | | $ | 48.70 | | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 40.29 | | | $ | 44.69 | | | $ | 0.17 | | Full Year | | $ | 38.42 | | | $ | 53.68 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 38.70 | | | $ | 45.37 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
Based on composite trades reported by the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange and dividends paid for each fiscal quarter for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Approximate number of record holders of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2013: 1,9002016: 1,900. The following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the CompanyCompany’s Common Stock for the past five fiscal years with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Household Products Index described more fully below. The returns are indexed to a value of $100 at December 31, 2008.2011. Dividend reinvestment has been assumed. Comparison of Cumulative Five-Year Total Return among Company, S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Household Products Index(1) (1) | S&P 500 Household Products Index consists of THE CLOROX COMPANY, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and P&G. |
 
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | INDEXED RETURNS (Years Ending) | | Company / Index | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | |  Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
| | | 100.00 | | | | 108.63 | | | | 125.23 | | | | 168.77 | | | | 201.33 | | | | 253.59 | |  S&P 500 Index
| | | 100.00 | | | | 126.46 | | | | 145.50 | | | | 148.58 | | | | 172.35 | | | | 228.15 | |  S&P 500 Household Products Index
| | | 100.00 | | | | 106.82 | | | | 114.49 | | | | 126.27 | | | | 137.34 | | | | 171.78 | |
| | | | | INDEXED RETURNS (Years ending) | | | | | Company / Index | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | ■ Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | | | 100.00 | | | 119.29 | | | 150.26 | | | 181.96 | | | 199.12 | | | 210.53 | | ■ S&P 500 Index | | | 100.00 | | | 116.00 | | | 153.56 | | | 174.57 | | | 176.97 | | | 198.12 | | ■ S&P 500 Household Products Index | | | 100.00 | | | 108.77 | | | 136.04 | | | 155.97 | | | 148.85 | | | 156.03 | |
Share Repurchase Authorization On January 29, 2014,November 2, 2016, the Board authorized a new share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $500 million in shares of Common Stock. ThisStock (the “2016 Share Repurchase Program”). The 2016 Share Repurchase Program does not have an expiration and replaced the 2015 Share Repurchase Program. The Company also continued its evergreen share repurchase program, replaces the Company’s share repurchase program previously announced on November 5, 2012. In 2013, the Company purchased 0.9 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $50 million under the previous share purchase authorization, which is now terminated. In addition,authorized by the Board authorized a new evergreen share repurchase program,on January 29, 2014, under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, the Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans. As partIn 2016, the Company purchased approximately 9.0 million shares of Common Stock for $400.0, of which $103.0 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase programs, in February 2014,program, $200.0 was purchased under the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) contract with2016 Share Repurchase Program, and $97.0 was purchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program. As a commercial bank to purchase $140 millionresult of the Company’s common stock. The Company paid $140 million topurchases, there remained $300.0 under the bank, inclusive2016 Share Repurchase Program as of fees, and received an initial delivery of approximately 2 million shares, which reduced the Company’s shares outstanding. The Company used cash on hand to fund the initial purchase price. The total amount of shares to be ultimately deliveredDecember 31, 2016.
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | | | Average Price Paid per Share(2) | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under All Programs(3) | | 10/1/2016 to 10/31/2016 | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | $ | 128,353,339 | | 11/1/2016 to 11/30/2016 | | | 4,500,668 | | | $ | 44.50 | | | | 4,494,668 | | | $ | 300,000,000 | | 12/1/2016 to 12/31/2016 | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | $ | 300,000,000 | | Total | | | 4,500,668 | | | $ | 44.50 | | | | 4,494,668 | | | | | |
(1) Includes purchases by the bank will be determinedCompany and certain affiliated purchasers within the meaning of Rule 10b-18(a)(3) during the fourth quarter of 2016. (2) Average price paid per share in the period includes commission. (3) The 2015 Share Repurchase Program was replaced by the average price per2016 Share Repurchase Program on November 2, 2016. The evergreen share paid by the bank during the purchase period, whichrepurchase program has no specified cap and therefore is expected to endnot reflected in mid-May 2014.this column. As of the filing of this Annual Report, the Company has made no purchases in 2014 other than those pursuant to the ASR described above.
ITEMITEM 6.
| SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included in this Annual Report. The selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods presented have been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FIVE-YEARFIVE‑YEAR FINANCIAL REVIEW
(Dollars in millions, except per share data and employees) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013(1) | | | 2012(1) | | | 2011(1) | | | 2010(1) | | | 2009(1) | | Operating Results | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 3,194.3 | | | | 2,921.9 | | | | 2,749.3 | | | | 2,589.2 | | | | 2,520.9 | | Marketing expenses | | $ | 399.8 | | | | 357.3 | | | | 354.1 | | | | 338.0 | | | | 353.6 | | Research and development expenses | | $ | 61.8 | | | | 54.8 | | | | 55.1 | | | | 53.7 | | | | 55.1 | | Income from Operations(2,3,4) | | $ | 622.2 | | | | 545.1 | | | | 492.6 | | | | 445.0 | | | | 412.9 | | % of Sales | | | 19.5 | % | | | 18.7 | % | | | 17.9 | % | | | 17.2 | % | | | 16.4 | % | Net Income(2,3,4,6) | | $ | 394.4 | | | | 349.8 | | | | 309.6 | | | | 270.7 | | | | 243.5 | | Net Income per Share-Basic(6) | | $ | 2.85 | | | | 2.50 | | | | 2.16 | | | | 1.91 | | | | 1.73 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted(6) | | $ | 2.79 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 2.12 | | | | 1.87 | | | | 1.70 | | Financial Position | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Assets | | $ | 4,259.7 | | | | 4,098.1 | | | | 3,117.6 | | | | 2,945.2 | | | | 3,118.4 | | Total Debt(4) | | $ | 803.3 | | | | 903.2 | | | | 252.3 | | | | 339.7 | | | | 816.3 | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 2,300.0 | | | | 2,061.1 | | | | 2,040.8 | | | | 1,870.9 | | | | 1,601.8 | | Total Debt as a % of Total Capitalization | | | 26 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 34 | % | Other Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average Common Shares Outstanding-Basic | | | 138.6 | | | | 140.1 | | | | 143.2 | | | | 142.0 | | | | 140.8 | | Cash Dividends Paid | | $ | 155.2 | | | | 134.5 | | | | 97.4 | | | | 44.0 | | | | 32.3 | | Cash Dividends Paid per Common Share | | $ | 1.12 | | | | 0.96 | | | | 0.68 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.23 | | Stockholders’ Equity per Common Share | | $ | 16.59 | | | | 14.71 | | | | 14.25 | | | | 13.17 | | | | 11.38 | | Additions to Property, Plant & Equipment(5) | | $ | 67.1 | | | | 74.5 | | | | 76.6 | | | | 63.8 | | | | 135.4 | | Depreciation & Amortization | | $ | 90.5 | | | | 85.0 | | | | 77.1 | | | | 71.6 | | | | 85.4 | | Employees at Year-End | | | 4,177 | | | | 4,354 | | | | 3,457 | | | | 3,543 | | | | 3,664 | |
| | 2016 (1) | | | 2015 (1) | | | 2014 (1) | | | 2013 (1) | | | 2012 (1) | | Operating Results | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 3,493.1 | | | | 3,394.8 | | | | 3,297.6 | | | | 3,194.3 | | | | 2,921.9 | | Marketing expenses | | $ | 427.2 | | | | 417.5 | | | | 416.9 | | | | 399.8 | | | | 357.3 | | Research and development expenses | | $ | 63.2 | | | | 64.7 | | | | 59.8 | | | | 61.8 | | | | 54.8 | | Income from Operations (2, 3) | | $ | 724.2 | | | | 674.2 | | | | 641.2 | | | | 622.2 | | | | 545.1 | | % of Sales | | | 20.7 | % | | | 19.9 | % | | | 19.4 | % | | | 19.5 | % | | | 18.7 | % | Net Income (2, 4) | | $ | 459.0 | | | | 410.4 | | | | 413.9 | | | | 394.4 | | | | 349.8 | | Net Income per Share-Basic (3, 4, 5) | | $ | 1.78 | | | | 1.57 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.43 | | | | 1.25 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted (3, 4, 5) | | $ | 1.75 | | | | 1.54 | | | | 1.51 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.23 | | Financial Position | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Assets | | $ | 4,354.1 | | | | 4,256.9 | | | | 4,359.2 | | | | 4,237.3 | | | | 4,072.5 | | Total Debt (2) | | $ | 1,120.2 | | | | 1,050.0 | | | | 1,086.6 | | | | 797.3 | | | | 895.6 | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | $ | 1,977.9 | | | | 2,023.2 | | | | 2,101.9 | | | | 2,300.0 | | | | 2,061.1 | | Total Debt as a % of Total Capitalization | | | 36 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 30 | % | Other Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average Common Shares Outstanding-Basic (5) | | | 257.6 | | | | 262.2 | | | | 270.2 | | | | 277.2 | | | | 280.2 | | Cash Dividends Paid | | $ | 183.0 | | | | 175.3 | | | | 167.5 | | | | 155.2 | | | | 134.5 | | Cash Dividends Paid per Common Share (5) | | $ | 0.71 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.62 | | | | 0.56 | | | | 0.48 | | Stockholders' Equity per Common Share (5) | | $ | 7.68 | | | | 7.72 | | | | 7.78 | | | | 8.30 | | | | 7.36 | | Additions to Property, Plant & Equipment (6) | | $ | 49.8 | | | | 61.8 | | | | 70.5 | | | | 67.1 | | | | 74.5 | | Depreciation & Amortization | | $ | 107.6 | | | | 101.0 | | | | 91.2 | | | | 90.5 | | | | 85.0 | | Employees at Year-End | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,406 | | | | 4,145 | | | | 4,177 | | | | 4,354 | |
(1) | Period to period comparisons of the data presented above are impacted by the effect of acquisitions and divestitures made by the Company, and a two-for-one stock split in 2011 effected in the form of a stock dividend.Company. For further explanation of the impact of the acquisitions occurring in 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014 refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. |
(2) | 20092014 results include a pre-tax net gain of $20 million ($12 million after tax) related to settlement of the Company’s litigation with Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and a pre-tax charge of $25.5 million ($15.6 million after tax) related to the shutdown of the Company’s North Brunswick, New Jersey plant. |
(3) | 2010 results include a pension settlement charge of approximately $24 million pre-tax ($15.5 million after tax). |
(4) | 2012 results reflectsreflect an increase of $650 million$300.0 in debt and its impact on interest expense due to the acquisition of assets of Lil’ Drug Store Products, Inc. 2012 results reflect an increase of $650.0 in debt and its impact on interest expense due to the acquisition of Avid Health, and 2010Health.. |
(3) | 2015 results reflectsinclude an $8.9 pre-tax charge or $0.03 per share to terminate an international defined benefit pension plan. |
(4) | 2015 results include a reduction$17.0 or $0.06 per share impairment charge to write-off the remaining investment in debt due to $408 million outstanding balance under, and terminationNatronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”). |
(5) | On August 4, 2016, the Company announced a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s term loan provided by a syndicate of banks.common stock. Share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split which was effected on September 1, 2016. |
(5)(6) | 2015 and 2014 results include approximately $18.1 and $34.0, respectively, for expenditures for the gummy dietary supplement product line expansion at the York facilities. 2012 results includesinclude $37.8 million for expenditures for the Victorville and 2009 results include $85 million for construction of the York, Pennsylvania facility. |
(6) | 2011 results include a $13 million or $0.09 per share charge associated with an international deferred tax valuation allowance. |
33
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) ITEMITEM 7.
| MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements. OVERVIEW The Company’s Business The Company develops, manufactures, markets and sells a broad range of household, personal care and specialty products. The Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brands through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores, and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company also sells specialty products to industrial customers and distributors. The Company focuses its consumer products marketing efforts principally on its ten “power brands.” These well-recognized brand names include ARM & HAMMER, (usedused in multiple product categories such as baking soda, cat litter, carpet deodorization and laundry detergent),detergent; TROJAN condoms, lubricants and vibrators,vibrators; OXICLEAN stain removers, cleaning solutions, laundry detergent, dishwashing detergent and bleach alternatives,alternatives; SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes,and manual toothbrushes; FIRST RESPONSE home pregnancy and ovulation test kits,kits; NAIR depilatories,depilatories; ORAJEL oral analgesics,analgesic; XTRA laundry detergent, anddetergent; L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy dietary supplements. The Company considers four of these brands to be “mega brands”: ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN,supplements; and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION, and is giving greatest focus to the growth of these brands.BATISTE dry shampoos. The Company operates its business in three segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD. The Consumer Domestic segment includes the power brands noted above and other household and personal care products such as SCRUB FREE, KABOOM and ORANGE GLO cleaning products, FELINE PINE cat litter, ANSWER home pregnancy and ovulation test kits, ARRID antiperspirant, CLOSE-UP and AIM toothpastes and SIMPLY SALINE nasal saline moisturizer. The Consumer International segment primarily sells a variety of personal care products, some of which use the same brand names as the Company’s domestic product lines, in international markets including Canada, France, Australia, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Brazil. The SPD segment is the largest U.S. producer of sodium bicarbonate, which it sells together with other specialty inorganic chemicals for a variety of industrial, institutional, medical and food applications. This segment also sells a range of animal nutrition and specialty cleaning products. In 2013,2016, the Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD segments represented approximately 75%77%, 17%15% and 8%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated net sales. Fiscal Year 20132016 Financial Highlights
Key fiscal year 20132016 financial results include: 20132016 net sales grew 9.3%2.9% over fiscal year 2012,2015, with gains in two of the Company’s threeConsumer Domestic and Consumer International segments, reflectingprimarily due to volume growth in both the base businessConsumer Domestic and Consumer International segments, helped in part by the Company’s gummy vitamin dietary supplements business.January 2016 acquisition of Spencer Forrest, Inc. (“Spencer Forrest”), the maker of TOPPIK, (the “Toppik Acquisition”), partially offset by lower sales of animal productivity products.
On December 22, 2016, the Company completed the Anusol Acquisition, acquiring the ANUSOL and RECTINOL businesses from Johnson & Johnson, Inc. for $130. Total annual sales for ANUSOL and RECTINOL were $24 in 2016. Gross margin increased 80100 basis points to 45.0%45.5% in fiscal year 20132016 from 44.2%44.5% in fiscal year 2012, reflecting the benefit of productivity programs outpacing2015, primarily due to lower manufacturing and commodity inflation and unfavorable price/mix.costs. Operating margin increased 80 basis points to 19.5%20.7% in fiscal year 20132016 from 18.7%19.9% in fiscal year 2012,2015, reflecting a higher gross margin expansion and slightly lower marketing costs, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) leverage offset. The Company reported diluted net earnings per share in fiscal year 2016 of $1.75, an increase of approximately 14.0% from fiscal year 2015 diluted net earnings per share of $1.54. Cash provided by incremental marketing investments.operations was $655.3, a $49.2 increase from the prior year, due to higher cash earnings and improved working capital. The Company returned $583.0 to its stockholders through dividends and share repurchases. 34
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) The Company achieved diluted net earnings per share in fiscal year 2013 of $2.79, an increase of approximately 14% from fiscal year 2012 diluted net earnings per share of $2.45.
Cash from operations was $499.6 million, a $24 million decrease from the prior year, reflecting the shift of a $36 million payment of the December 2012 estimated federal tax payment into the first quarter of 2013 as a result of Hurricane Sandy relief.
The Company returned $205 million to its stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.
Strategic Goals, Challenges and Initiatives The Company’s ability to generate sales depends on consumer demand for its products and retail customers’ decisions to carry its products, which are, in part, affected by general economic conditions in its markets. In 2013,2016, many of the markets in which the Company operates continued to experience pricing pressures, general economic softness and weak or inconsistent consumer demand. Although the Company’s consumer products generally are consumer staples and less vulnerable to decreases in discretionary spending than other products, the continued economic downturn has reduced demand in many categories, particularly those in personal care, and affected Company sales in recent periods. Some customers have responded to economic conditions by increasing their private label offerings (primarily in the dietary supplements, diagnostic kits and oral analgesics categories), and consolidating the product selections they offer to the top few leading brands in each category. In addition, an increasing portion of the Company’s product categories are being sold by club stores, dollar stores and mass merchandisers. These customer actions have placed downward pressure on the Company’s sales and gross margins. The Company expects the challenging conditions of the last several years to continuea competitive marketplace in 2014 primarily2017 due to continued weak consumer demand in many categories, new product introductions by competitors and continuing aggressive competitive pricing pressures. In the U.S., a continued slowdown in income growth, thean improving unemployment rate and the uncertainty of unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed may also adversely impacthigher disposable income due to low gasoline prices are expected to have a positive effect on consumption patterns. To continue to deliver attractive results for stockholders in this environment, the Company intends to continue to aggressively pursue several key strategic initiatives: maintain competitive marketing and trade spending, tightly control its cost structure, continue to develop and launch new and differentiated products, and pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company also intends to continue to grow its product sales geographically (in an attempt to mitigate the impact of weakness in any one area), and maintain an offering of premium and value brand products (to appeal to a wide range of consumers). The CompanyThere continues to experience heightened competitive activity in certain product categories from other larger multinational competitors, some of which have greater resources. Such activities have included new product introductions, more aggressive product claims and marketing challenges, as well as increased promotional spending. Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has beenbe significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category. For example, P&G markets a lower-priced line of laundry detergents, Simply Tide, which competes directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents. P&G has significantly increased its discounting of Simply Tide which could have a broad negative impact on the laundry category contributingpricing and profitability. In addition, in 2016, Henkel entered the U.S. market with Persil, its leading worldwide premium laundry detergent, and on September 1, 2016 completed its acquisition of Sun Products, the maker of All, Wisk, Sun, and private label laundry detergents. While it is too early to an overall category decline. During 2012, the category declined by 0.6% and during 2013, the category declined an additional 3.2%. Whileassess what impact this will have on the Company’s laundry detergent sales havebusiness, the introduction of Persil and Henkel’s increased more than offsettingscale and market share could precipitate greater price competition in the category and distribution pressure with a potential adverse impact ofon the totalCompany’s laundry detergent business. Moreover, the unit dose laundry detergent segment is the fastest growing segment in the laundry detergent category, decline,having grown to approximately 16% of the category since its introduction in 2012, and the Company faces pressure to achieve its proportionate share of the segment with a potential adverse impact on its share of the laundry detergent category. The Company continues to evaluate and vigorously combat these pressures through, among other things, new product introductions and increased marketing and trade spending. Additionally, while the category grew 3.3% for the 52 weeks ended December 17, 2016 and 1.6% for the 52 weeks ended December 19, 2015, after experiencing declines in 2013 and 2014, there is no assurance that the category will not decline further orin the future and that the Company will be able to offset any such category decline.
Moreover, P&G, one of the Company’s major competitors and the market leader in premium laundry detergent, including unit dose laundry detergent, has recently reconfigured certain of its product offerings and related marketing and pricing strategies and launched various products to compete more directly with the Company’s core ARM & HAMMER, XTRA and OXICLEAN power brands. For example, in 2014, P&G is launching a lower-priced laundry detergent to compete directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents, is attempting to leverage its leadership position in unit dose laundry detergent with the introduction of
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
a premium unit dose offering, and has launched a versatile stain remover, all of which are expected to be supported by aggressive trade spending and marketing. These actions, together with expected ongoing weak consumer spending and increased price competition, could negatively impact the Company’s laundry detergent and versatile stain remover businesses.
The Company is respondinghas responded to these competitive pressures by, among other things, focusing on strengthening its key brands, including increased focus on the ARM & HAMMER, OXICLEAN, TROJAN, and L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION megaand BATISTE brands which each span various product categories and represented approximately 60% of the Company’s sales and profits in 2013, through the launch of innovative new products, which span various product categories, including premium and strong sales executionvalue household products supported by increased marketing and trade spending. These mega brands have advantages over other power brands, including the ability to leverage research and development and marketing investments and lower overhead costs across mega brand categories. For example, the Company’s 2014 responsive product introductions include the simultaneous launch of OXICLEAN branded products into the mid/premium tier laundry detergent segment, auto dish detergent category and bleach alternatives with continued support of, and innovation in, the Company’s base ARM & HAMMER and OXICLEAN businesses, to create scale and maximize marketing efforts. Mega brand launches and launches of other products are anticipated to contribute more incremental new product revenue than the introduction of new products has in prior years, and a significant portion of those revenues will include expansion into new categories with premium household products, supported by increased levels of slotting, trade promotions and incremental marketing support and planned ongoing technology investment. There can be no assurance that these measures will be successful. Despite challenging economic conditions and customer responses to these conditions,In 2016, the Company was able to grow market share in sixfour of nine10 of its “power brands” in 2013, including laundry detergent.measured channels. The Company’s global product portfolio consists of both premium (55%(60% of total worldwide consumer revenue in 2013)2016) and value (45%(40% of total worldwide consumer revenue in 2013)2016) brands, which it believes enables it to succeed in a range of economic environments. The Company’s value brands have performed strongly during economic downturns, and the Company intends to continue to develop a portfolio of appealing new products to build loyalty among cost-conscious consumers.
Over the past 1316 years, the Company has diversified from an almost exclusively U.S. business to a global company with approximately 17%16% of sales derived from foreign countries in 2013.2016. The Company has operations in six countries (Canada, Mexico, U.K., France, Australia and Brazil) and exports to over 90 other countries. In 2013,2016, the Company benefited from its concentration in North America in light of the economic downturn in Europe; however, the Company has continuedfocused and will continue to focus on selectively expanding its global business. Net sales generated outside of the United States are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations as well as political uncertainty which could impact future operating results. The Company also continues to focus on controlling its costs. The Company experienced continued high raw material and energy costs throughout 2013. Historically, the Company has been able to mitigate the effects of cost increases primarily by implementing cost reduction programs and, to a lesser extent, by passing along some of these cost 35
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) increases to customers. The Company has also entered into set pricing and pre-buying arrangements with certain suppliers and hedge agreements for diesel fuel and related surcharges. However, the increased price competition for these commodities in recent periods has diminished the impact of some of these measures and affected the Company’s gross margins. fuel. Additionally, maintaining tight controls on overhead costs has been a hallmark of the Company and has enabled it to effectively navigate recent challenging economic conditions. The identification and integration of strategic acquisitions are an important component of the Company’s overall strategy. Acquisitions have added significantly to Company sales and profits over the last decade. This is evidenced by the Company’s 2015 acquisition of certain assets of Varied Industries Corporation (the “VI-COR Acquisition”) and 2016 acquisitions of Spencer Forrest, Inc., the maker of TOPPIK, and the ANUSOL and RECTINOL businesses from Johnson & Johnson in the Anusol Acquisition. However, the failure to effectively integrate any acquisition or achieve expected synergies may cause the Company to incur material asset write-downs. The Company actively seeks acquisitions that fit its guidelines, CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
and its strong financial position provides it with flexibility to take advantage of acquisition opportunities. In addition, the Company’s ability to quickly integrate acquisitions and leverage existing infrastructure has enabled it to establish a strong track record in making accretive acquisitions. Since 2001, the Company has acquired eightnine of its nineten “power brands”. In 2013, the Company completed the integration of the acquisition of its L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION dietary supplements business, which it acquired in 2012. The Company believes it is positioned to meet the ongoing challenges described above due to its strong financial condition, experience operating in challenging environments and continued focus on key strategic initiatives: maintaining competitive marketing and trade spending, managing its cost structure, continuing to develop and launch new and differentiated products, and pursuing strategic acquisitions. This focus, together with the strength of the Company’s portfolio of premium and value brands, has enabled the Company to succeed in a range of economic environments, and shouldis expected to position the Company to continue to increase stockholder value over the long-term. Moreover, the generation of a significant amount of cash from operations, as a result of net income and effective working capital management, combined with an investment grade credit rating provides the Company with the financial flexibility to pursue acquisitions, drive new product development, make capital expenditures to support organic growth and gross margin improvements, return cash to stockholders through dividends and share buy backs, and reduce outstanding debt, positioning it to continue to create stockholder value. For information regarding risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report. Recent Developments Dividend Increase
Stock Split On August 4, 2016, the Company announced a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”). The stock split was structured in the form of a 100% stock dividend, payable on September 1, 2016 to stockholders of record as of August 15, 2016. All applicable amounts in the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split. Share Repurchase AuthorizationProgram On January 29, 2014 the Board declared an 11% increase in the regular quarterly dividend from $0.28 to $0.31 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend of $1.24 per share or a current dividend yield of approximately 1.9% per share as of February 14, 2014. The decision raises the dividend payout from $155 million to approximately $170 million. On January 29, 2014,November 2, 2016, the Board authorized a new share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $500 million$500.0 in shares of Common Stock. This share repurchase program replacesStock (the “2016 Share Repurchase Program”). The 2016 Share Repurchase Program replaced the Company’s share repurchase program previously announced on November 5, 2012. In 2013, the2015 Share Repurchase Program and does not have an expiration. The Company purchased 0.9 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $50 million under the previous share purchase authorization, which is now terminated. In addition, the Board authorized a newwill continue its evergreen share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, the Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans.
As part of the share repurchase programs, in February 2014,
Toppik Acquisition On January 4, 2016, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase contractacquired Spencer Forrest, Inc., the maker of TOPPIK, the leading brand of hair building fibers for people with a commercial bank tothinning hair in the Toppik Acquisition. The total purchase $140 million of the Company’s common stock.price was $175.3. The Company paid $140 million tofinanced the bank, inclusiveacquisition with short-term borrowings. This brand is managed within the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. Anusol and Rectinol Acquisitions On December 22, 2016, the Company acquired the ANUSOL and RECTINOL businesses from Johnson & Johnson, Inc. for $130. These are the number one or number two hemorrhoid care brands in each market in which they operate, primarily in the U.K., Canada, Australia and South Africa with total annual sales of fees,$24 in 2016. The acquisition was funded with short-term borrowings and received an initial delivery of approximately 2 million shares, which reduced the Company’s shares outstanding. The Company used cash on hand to fund the initial purchase price. The total amount of shares to be ultimately delivered by the bank will be determined bymanaged in the average price per share paid by the bank during the purchase period, which is expected to end in mid-May 2014.Consumer International segment. As of the filing of this Annual Report, the Company has made no purchases in 2014 other than those pursuant to the ASR described above.36
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) Viviscal Acquisition On January 17, 2017, the Company acquired the VIVISCAL business from Lifes2Good Holdings Limited for approximately $160. Viviscal is the number one hair care supplement brand both in the U.S. and the U.K. with global annual sales of $44 in 2016. This brand is complementary to the Company’s global BATISTE dry shampoo and TOPPIK hair care business. The acquisition was funded with short-term borrowings and will be managed in the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. Dividend Increase On February 7, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a 7% increase in the regular quarterly dividend from $0.1775 to $0.19 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend of $0.76 per share payable to stockholders of record as of February 21, 2017. The increase raises the annual dividend payout from $183 to approximately $195, and maintains the Company’s payout of dividends relative to net income at approximately 40%. Brazil’s Chemical Business During fourth quarter of 2016, the Company decided to sell its Brazilian chemical business to focus on its Brazilian consumer business, resulting in a plant impairment charge of $4.9 recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016 based upon an anticipated selling price. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company signed an agreement to sell the business, resulting in an approximate $5.0 expense for severance and other charges. Sales for the Brazilian chemical business in 2016 were approximately $22.0. The Company anticipates the transaction to close during the first quarter. International Pension Plan Termination In 2016 the Company authorized the termination of an international defined benefit pension plan under which approximately 336 participants, including 53 active employees, have accrued benefits. The Company anticipates completing the termination of this plan by the end of the second quarter of 2017, once regulatory approvals are obtained. In addition to plan assets, the Company will need to make a one-time payment of $20.0 to $26.0 ($14.0 to $19.0 after tax) to purchase annuities for participants. The Company estimates that it will incur a one-time expense of $49.0 to $55.0 ($40.0 to $45.0 after tax) in 2017 when the plan settlement is completed. This expense primarily includes the effect of the additional cash payment required at settlement and pension settlement accounting rules which require accelerated recognition of actuarial losses that were to be amortized over the expected benefit lives of participants. The estimated expense is subject to change based on valuations at the actual date of settlement. Upon the termination of these plans in 2017, the Company will have no further obligations with respect to material defined benefit pension plans.
37
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these judgments are subject to uncertainty. They are based on the Company’s historical experience, its observation of trends in industry, information provided by its customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. The Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates are described below. Revenue Recognition and Promotional and Sales Return Reserves Virtually all of the Company’s revenue represents sales of finished goods inventory and is recognized when received or picked up by the Company’s customers. The reserves for consumer and trade promotion liabilities and sales returns are established based on the Company’s best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Promotional reserves are provided for sales incentives, such as coupons to consumers, and sales incentives provided to customers (such as slotting, cooperative advertising, incentive discounts based on volume of sales and other arrangements made directly with customers). All such costs are netted against sales. Slotting costs are recorded when the product is delivered to the customer. Cooperative advertising costs are recorded when the customer places the advertisement for the Company’s products. Discounts relating to price reduction arrangements are recorded when the related sale takes place. Costs associated with end-aisle or other in-store displays are recorded when product that is subject to the promotion is sold. The Company relies on historical experience and forecasted data to determine the required reserves. For example, the Company uses historical experience to project coupon redemption rates to determine reserve requirements. Based on the total face value of Consumer Domestic coupons redeemed over the past several years, if the actual rate of redemptions were to deviate by 0.1% from the rate for which reserves are accrued in the financial statements, an approximately $3.1$4.1 difference in the reserve required for coupons would result. With regard to other promotional reserves and sales returns, the Company uses experience-based estimates, customer and sales organization inputs and historical trend analysis in arriving at the reserves required. If the Company’s estimates for promotional activities and sales returns were to change by 10% the impact to promotional spending and sales return accruals would be approximately $7.1.$6.4. While management believes that its promotional and sales returns reserves are reasonable and that appropriate judgments have been made, estimated amounts could differ materially from actual future obligations. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company reduced promotion liabilities by approximately $3.7, $4.0$5.4, $4.3 and $8.2,$6.7, respectively, based on a change in estimate as a result of actual experience and updated information. These adjustments are immaterial relative to the amount of trade promotion expense incurred annually by the Company. Impairment of goodwill, trade names and other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment Carrying values of goodwill, trade names and other indefinite lived intangible assets are reviewed periodically for possible impairment.For finite intangible assets, the Company assesses business triggering events. The Company’s impairment analysis is based on a discounted cash flow approach that requires significant judgment with respect to unit volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. Management uses estimates based on expected trends in making these assumptions. With respect to goodwill, impairment occurs when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the discounted present value of cash flows for that reporting unit. For trademarkstrade names and other intangible assets, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows, which represents the estimated fair value of the asset. Judgment is required in assessing whether assets may have CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
become impaired between annual valuations. Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological change, distribution losses, or competitive activities and acts by governments and courts may indicate that an asset has become impaired. The result of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeded the carrying values of all reporting units. In addition, there were no goodwill impairment charges for each of the three yearyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2016. The Company recognized trade name impairment charges within SG&A for the three year period ended December 31, 2013 as follows:38
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Segments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer Domestic | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Consumer International | | | 4.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 6.5 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 for an intangible asset related to the Consumer Domestic segment. The trade name impairment chargescharge recorded in 2013 were2014 was a result of actual and projected reductions in sales and profitability as a result of increased competition. The amount of the impairment charges was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the assetsasset to theirits carrying amount. Fair value was estimated based on a “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” discounted cash flow method, which contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change, and therefore could impact fair values in the future. The Company determined that the remaining carryingfair value of all other trade namesintangible assets as of December 31, 2016 exceeded their respective faircarrying values based upon the forecasted cash flows and profitability of the brands.profitability. It is possible that the Company’s conclusions regarding impairment or recoverability of goodwill or other intangible assets could change in future periods if, for example, (i) the businesses or brands do not perform as projected, (ii) overall economic conditions in 20142017 or future years vary from current assumptions (including changes in discount rates), (iii) business conditions or strategies change from current assumptions, (iv) investors require higher rates of return on equity investments in the marketplace or (v) enterprise values of comparable publicly traded companies, or actual sales transactions of comparable companies, were to decline, resulting in lower multiples of revenues and EBITDA. A future impairment charge for goodwill or intangible assets could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate possible impairment.The Company’s impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level at which cash flows of the long-lived assets are largely independent of other groups of Company assets and liabilities. The analysis requires management judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines, and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates. The Company conducts annual reviews to identify idle and underutilized equipment, and reviews business plans for possible impairment implications. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows. When an impairment is indicated, the estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and fair value.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The Company recognized charges related to plant impairment and equipment obsolescence, which occurs in the ordinary course of business during the three year period, ended December 31, 2013 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For the Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Segments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer Domestic | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 1.9 | | Consumer International | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.2 | | Specialty Products | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 1.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The 2013 and 2012 Consumer Domestic and SPD charges are due to the idling of equipment and the 2012 Consumer International charge is due to the cancelation of a software project. The 2011 Consumer Domestic charge is a result of the idling of equipment. The 2011 SPD charge is associated with the Company’s decision to explore strategic options for the specialty chemical business in Brazil. The estimates and assumptions used in connection with impairment analyses are consistent with the business plans and estimates that the Company uses to manage its business operations. Nevertheless, future outcomes may differ materially from management’s estimates. If the Company’s products fail to achieve estimated volume and pricing targets, market conditions unfavorably change or other significant estimates are not realized, then the Company’s revenue and cost forecasts may not be achieved, and the Company may be required to recognize additional impairment charges.
Inventory valuation When appropriate, the Company writes down the carrying value of its inventory to the lower of cost or market (net realizable value, which reflects any costs to sell or dispose). The Company identifies any slow moving, obsolete or excess inventory to determine whether an adjustment is required to establish a new carrying value. The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates and assumptions about the future demand for the Company’s products, technological changes, and new product introductions. In addition, the Company’s allowance for obsolescence may be impacted by the reduction of the number of stock keeping units (SKUs). The Company evaluates its inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis and records adjustments as required. Adjustments to inventory to reflect a reduction in net realizable value were $10.1$10.5 at December 31, 2013, and $5.72016, $12.6 at December 31, 2012. Valuation of pension2015, and postretirement benefit costs
The Company’s pension costs relate solely to its international operations. Both pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in benefit cost valuations are key assumptions provided by the Company to its actuaries, including the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Material changes in the Company’s international pension and domestic/international postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions as well as fluctuations in plan assets.
The discount rate is subject to change each year, consistent with changes in applicable high-quality,long-term corporate bond indices. Based on the expected duration of the benefit payments for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement plans, the Company refers to an applicable index and expected term of benefit payments to select a discount rate at which it believes the plan benefits could be effectively settled. The Company’s weighted average discount rate for its international pension plans as of December 31, 2013 is 4.48% as compared to 4.16% used$8.3 at December 31, 2012. Based on the published rate as of December 31, 2013 that matched estimated cash flows for the plans, the Company used a weighted average discount rate of 4.56% for its postretirement plans as compared to 3.89% used at December 31, 2012.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The expected long-term rate of return on international pension plan assets is selected by taking into account the historical trend, the expected duration of the projected benefit obligation for the plans, the asset mix of the plans and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation. Based on these factors, the Company’s weighted average expected long-term rate of return for assets of its pension plans for 2013 was 5.45%, compared to 5.35% used in 2012. A 50 basis point change in the expected long-term rate of return would result in an approximate $0.5 change in pension expense for 2014.
As noted above, changes in assumptions used by management may result in material changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs. In 2013, other comprehensive income reflected a $5.0 decrease in its remaining pension plan obligations and a $6.6 decrease for postretirement benefit plans. The changes are related to the change in discount rates for all plans and other actuarial assumptions.
The Company made cash contributions of approximately $17.5 to its pension plans in 2013, including voluntary contributions of $13.0. The Company estimates it will be required to make cash contributions to its pension plans of approximately $3.4 in 2014 to offset 2014 benefit payments and administrative costs in excess of investment returns.
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Management provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for amounts which are not considered “more likely than not” to be realized. The Company records liabilities for potential assessments in various tax jurisdictions under ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.U.S. GAAP guidelines. The liabilities relate to tax return positions that, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by the tax authorities and do not meet the minimum recognition threshold required under applicable accounting guidance for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement. The Company adjusts this liability as a result of changes in tax legislation, interpretations of laws by courts, rulings by tax authorities, changes in estimates and the expiration of the statute of limitations. Many of the judgments involved in adjusting the liability involve assumptions and estimates that are highly uncertain and subject to change. In this regard, settlement of any issue, or an adverse determination in litigation, with a taxing authority could require the use of cash and result in an increase in the Company’s annual tax rate. Conversely, favorable resolution of an issue with a taxing authority would be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s annual tax rate. New Accounting Pronouncements During the first quarter of 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance for the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entityRefer to present information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notesNote 1 to the financial statements. The Company elected to present the requirements in the notes to the financial statements (see Note 15). The adoptionConsolidated Financial Statements for recently adopted accounting pronouncements and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of the new pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.December 31, 2016.
In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance requiring an entity to net its liability for unrecognized tax benefits against the deferred tax assets for all same jurisdiction net operating losses or similar tax loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards. A gross presentation will be required only if such carryforwards are not available as of
39
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) reporting date to settle any additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position or the entity does not intend to use these carryforwards for this purpose. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those years. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
There have been no other accounting pronouncements issued but not yet adopted by the Company which are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 AND 20112014 The discussion of results of operations at the consolidated level presented below is followed by a more detailed discussion of results of operations by segment. The discussion of the Company’s consolidated results of operations and segment operating results is presented on a historical basis for the years endingended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011.2014. The segment discussion also addresses certain product line information. The Company’s operating units are consistent with its reportable segments. Consolidated results 20132016 compared to 20122015
| Twelve Months Ended | | | Change vs. | | | Twelve Months Ended | | | December 31, 2016 | | | Prior Year | | | December 31, 2015 | | Net Sales | $ | 3,493.1 | | | | 2.9% | | | $ | 3,394.8 | | Gross Profit | $ | 1,590.6 | | | | 5.2% | | | $ | 1,511.8 | | Gross Margin | | 45.5 | % | | +100 basis points | | | | 44.5 | % | Marketing Expenses | $ | 427.2 | | | | 2.3% | | | $ | 417.5 | | Percent of Net Sales | | 12.2 | % | | -10 basis points | | | | 12.3 | % | Selling, General & Administrative Expenses | $ | 439.2 | | | | 4.5% | | | $ | 420.1 | | Percent of Net Sales | | 12.6 | % | | +30 basis points | | | | 12.3 | % | Income from Operations | $ | 724.2 | | | | 7.4% | | | $ | 674.2 | | Operating Margin | | 20.7 | % | | +80 basis points | | | | 19.9 | % |
Net Sales Net sales for the year ended December 31, 20132016 were $3,194.3, $272.4$3,493.1, an increase of $98.3, or approximately 9.3% above 20122.9% compared to 2015 net sales. The components of the net sales increase are as follows: Net Sales - Consolidated | December 31, 2016 | | | | | | Net Sales—Consolidated
| | December 31,
2013 | | Product volumes sold | | 3.1 | 3.8 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 0.1 | (1.9 | %) | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations / Other | | (0.9 | (0.5 | %) | AcquiredVolume from acquired product lines(1)
| | 0.6 | % | Net Sales increase | | 2.9 | % |
| (1) | | | 7.6 | % | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade
| | | 0.3 | % | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 9.3 | % | | | | | |
(1) | On October 1, 2012,January 4, 2016, the Company acquiredcompleted the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business.Toppik Acquisition, acquiring Spencer Forrest, Inc., the maker of TOPPIK, the leading brand of hair building fibers for people with thinning hair. Net sales of these product lines subsequent to thethis acquisition are included in the Company’s results.results since the date of acquisition. |
The volume change primarily reflects increased product salesVolume growth in the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segmentswas partially offset by lower SPD sales. Lower price/mix in Consumer Domestic and SPD was partially offset by favorable price/mix in Consumer International. Sales in the first quarter of 2012 were negatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.
Gross Profitvolume.
The Company’s gross profit for 20132016 was $1,438.0,$1,590.6, a $146.6$78.8 increase as compared to 2015. Gross margin was 45.5% in 2016 compared to 44.5% in 2015, a 100 basis points (“bps”) increase. The increase is due to lower manufacturing costs of 70 bps (including productivity programs and the same periodabsence of start-up costs incurred in 2012 due primarily to contributions from its gummy2015 associated with the Company’s new vitamin dietary supplementmanufacturing facility), lower commodity costs of 60 bps, and the impact of the higher margin acquired business higher sales volume and productivity improvement programs. These increases wereof 30 bps, partially offset by higher trade promotion andunfavorable foreign exchange rates of 30 bps, a plant impairment charge of 20 bps at an unfavorable product mix. Commodity costs for the Company were unchanged in 2013 as compared to 2012. Gross margin was 45.0% in 2013 as compared to 44.2% in 2012. Gross margin was higher due to the positive impact of productivity improvement programs and higher sales volume, partially offset by higher trade promotion and coupon costsinternational subsidiary and unfavorable product mix.price/volume mix of 10 bps. Operating Costs Marketing expenses for 20132016 were $399.8,$427.2, an increase of $42.5$9.7 compared to 2015. Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 10 bps to 12.2% in 2016 as compared to 20122015 due to 40 bps of leverage on higher net sales partially offset by 30 bps on higher expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) expenses for 2016 were $439.2, an increase of $19.1 or 4.5% compared to 2015. The increase is primarily due to costs associated with the gummy vitamin dietary supplement business,Toppik Acquisition and higher spendingcompensation costs, partially offset by a pension plan charge recorded in support2015. SG&A as a percentage of certain power brands and newnet sales increased 30 bps to 12.6% in 2016 compared to 12.3% in 2015. The increase is due to higher costs of 60 bps, partially offset by 30 bps of leverage associated with higher sales. 40
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) product launches. Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales were 12.5% in 2013 as compared to 12.2% in 2012.
SG&A expenses for 2013 were $416.0, an increase of $27.0 as compared to 2012 due primarily to operating costs associated with the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business, higher research and development and compensation costs and intangible asset impairment charges, partially offset by lower legal expenses. SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 13.0% in 2013 as compared to 13.3% in 2012.
Other Income and Expenses Equity in earnings of affiliates was $2.8increased by $15.0 in 2016 as compared to $8.92015. The increase in 2012. The decrease isearnings during 2016 was due primarily to ana $17.0 impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 20132015 associated with one of the Company’s affiliates and lower earnings from Armand as a result of increased raw material costs.remaining investment in Natronx. Interest expense in 2013 increased $13.72016 was $27.7, a decrease of $2.8 compared to 2012 principally2015 due to a lower amount of average debt incurred to finance the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2012 and interest associated with the financing lease obligation for the Company’s global headquarters that was fully occupied in January 2013.outstanding. Taxation The 20132016 tax rate was 34.0% as35.0% compared to 35.5%35.4% in 2012.2015. The effective2015 tax rate for 2013 was favorably affectednegatively impacted by a lower effective state tax rate and tax benefits relating tovaluation allowance recorded in connection with the federal research tax credit for 2013 and the retroactive extension of the federal research tax credit to January 2012 that occurred in the first quarter of 2013. The 2012 tax rate reflects no federal research tax credit.Natronx impairment charge. 20122015 compared to 20112014
Net Sales Net sales for the year ended December 31, 20122015 were $2,921.9, $172.6$3,394.8, an increase of $97.2, or approximately 6.3% above 20112.9% compared to 2014 net sales. The components of the net sales increase are the following:as follows: Net Sales - Consolidated | December 31, 2015 | | | | | | Net Sales—Consolidated
| | December 31,
2012 | | Product volumes sold | | 3.1 | 6.3 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 0.5 | (1.1 | %) | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations / Other | | (2.7 | (0.8 | %) | Acquired product lines(1) | | 2.0 | % | Net Sales increase | | 2.9 | % |
| (1) | | | 3.1 | % | Change in fiscal calendar
| | | (0.6 | %) | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade
| | | (0.6 | %) | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 6.3 | % | | | | | |
(1) | On October 1, 2012,September 19, 2014, the Company acquired certain brands in the L’IL CRITTERSLil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition (the “Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”) and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business. On June 28, 2011,on January 2, 2015, the Company acquired BATISTE dry shampoo.certain assets of Varied Industries Corporation (the “VI-COR Acquisition”). Net sales of these acquired product lines subsequent to the acquisitionacquisitions are included in the Company’s results. (See Note 6 toresults since the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for further information.)date of acquisition. |
All three segments reported volume increases and favorable price/mix for the year ended December 31, 2015. Gross Profit The Company’s gross profit for 2015 was $1,511.8, a $58.9 increase compared to 2014. Gross margin was 44.5% in 2015 compared to 44.1% in 2014, a 40 basis points (“bps”) increase. The increase is due to 30 bps associated with higher volume, price and mix, favorable impact associated with the Lil’ Drug Store Brands and VI-COR acquisitions of 40 bps, lower commodity costs of 70 bps, partially offset by higher manufacturing costs (net of productivity programs and including higher than anticipated start-up costs associated with the Company’s new vitamin manufacturing facility) of 70 bps and unfavorable foreign exchange rates of 30 bps. The higher volume, price and mix favorability included higher trade promotion and couponing to continue to support proven consumer trial generating activities for the OXICLEAN megabrand. Operating Costs Marketing expenses for 2015 were $417.5, an increase of $0.6 compared to 2014. The reason the increase was small was due to shifting some marketing funds to trade promotion and couponing to continue to support proven consumer trial generating activities for the OXICLEAN megabrand. Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 30 bps to 12.3% in 2015 compared to 12.6% in 2014. This is due to 30 bps from leverage of expenses on higher sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) expenses for 2015 were $420.1, an increase of $25.3 or 6.4% compared to 2014 due primarily to both on-going and one-time costs associated with the Lil’ Drug Store Brands and VI-COR acquisitions, higher compensation related costs, higher legal and research and development expenses and an $8.9 pension settlement charge in the second quarter of 2015. The increase was partially offset by lower foreign exchange rates. SG&A as a percentage of net sales increased 20 bps to 12.3% in 2015 compared to 12.1% in 2014. The increase is due to higher costs of 50 bps, including 25 bps associated with the pension charge, partially offset by 30 bps of leverage associated with higher sales. 41
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) The volume change primarily reflects increased sales of products in both Consumer Domestic and Consumer International, partially offset by unfavorable product mix and pricing primarily in Consumer Domestic. Sales in the first quarter of 2012 were negatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.
Gross Profit
The Company’s gross profit for 2012 was $1,291.4, a $76.9 increase as compared to 2011. The gross profit increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volumes and contributions from the gummy vitamin dietary supplement business, in-house production of unit dose detergent and the Company’s new manufacturing and distribution facility in Victorville, California, partially offset by unfavorable pricing and mix, higher commodity costs that were partially offset by productivity improvement programs and the unfavorable effect of foreign exchange rates. Gross margin was 44.2% in 2012 as well as in 2011. Gross margin was favorably impacted by manufacturing cost reduction projects partially offset by higher commodity costs and an inventory step-up charge related to the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business.
Operating Costs
Marketing expenses for 2012 were $357.3, an increase of $3.2 as compared to 2011 due primarily to the effect of the acquired businesses, partially offset by the impact of foreign exchange rates. Marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales were 12.2% in 2012 as compared to 12.9% in 2011. This reduction is due to a shift toward higher trade promotion spending, which is included in net sales, and partly due to the lower spending rate of the acquired L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business.
SG&A expenses for 2012 were $389.0, an increase of $21.2 as compared to 2011 due to costs associated with the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business, higher costs for salaries and fringe benefits, costs associated with the Company’s new headquarters facility and unfavorable foreign exchange rates partially offset by lower legal expenses.
Other Income and Expenses Equity in earnings of affiliates for 2015 was $8.9 asa loss of $5.8 compared to $10.0earnings of $11.6 in 2011.2014. The decrease isin earnings was primarily due to a $17.0 impairment charge associated with the Company’s remaining investment in Natronx recorded in the second quarter of 2015. This charge is primarily a result of lower than expected demand for the joint venture’s products as a result of a shift in the electric utility industry from coal-fired to natural gas-supplied power plants, continued delays in the implementation of updated federal regulations, and indirectly, the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling against the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) where the court stated that the EPA failed to properly consider the costs related to implement the start-up ofregulations. We believe that the Natronx joint venture.foregoing factors will likely further delay the demand for these products. Interest expense in 2012 increased $5.32015 was $30.5, an increase of $3.1 compared to 2011 primarily2014 due to thea higher amount of average debt incurred to purchase the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business. The Company issued $400 of 2.875% Senior Notes and $250 of commercial paper at the end of the third quarter of 2012. (See the “Liquidity and capital resources” below in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis for further information.)outstanding. Taxation The 20122015 tax rate was 35.5% as35.4% compared to 37.4%33.8% in 2011.2014. The 2015 tax rate was negatively impacted by a valuation allowance recorded in connection with the Natronx impairment charge. The tax rate in 2012for 2014 was favorably affectedimpacted by the settlement of a U.S. Internal Revenue Service audit for the years 2008 and 2009 in the first quarter. The effective tax rate for 2011 included a charge for the establishment of a valuation allowance of approximately $13 against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, offset by a deferreddiscrete adjustments related to uncertain income tax benefit of approximately $6 relating to New Jersey’s corporate tax reform legislation enacted in April 2011.positions. Segment results for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 The Company operates three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD. These segments are determined based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
structures. The results of the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business are reflected in the Consumer Domestic segment. The Company also has a Corporate segment. | | | Segment | | Products | Consumer Domestic | | Household and personal care products | | | Consumer International | | Primarily personal care products | | | SPD | | Specialty chemical products |
The Corporate segment income consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company held 50% ownership interests in each of Armand and ArmaKleen,ArmaKleen”, respectively, and aone-third ownership interest in Natronx.Natronx. The Company’s equity in earnings (losses) of Armand and ArmaKleen for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx for the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 2013, 20122015 and 20112014 are included in the Corporate segment. Some of the subsidiaries that are included in the Consumer International segment manufacture and sell personal care products to the Consumer Domestic segment. These sales are eliminated from the Consumer International segment results set forth below. Segment net sales and income before income taxes for each of the three years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer
Domestic | | | Consumer
International | | | SPD | | | Corporate(3) | | | Total | | Net Sales(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 2,413.5 | | | $ | 532.8 | | | $ | 248.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 3,194.3 | | 2012 | | | 2,156.9 | | | | 510.1 | | | | 254.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2,921.9 | | 2011 | | | 1,979.1 | | | | 509.1 | | | | 261.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2,749.3 | | | | | | | | Income Before Income Taxes(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 501.0 | | | $ | 64.5 | | | $ | 29.5 | | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | 597.8 | | 2012 | | | 428.8 | | | | 71.0 | | | | 33.8 | | | | 8.9 | | | | 542.5 | | 2011 | | | 386.0 | | | | 68.9 | | | | 29.7 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 494.6 | |
| Consumer | | | Consumer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic | | | International | | | SPD | | | Corporate(3) | | | Total | | Net Sales(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | $ | 2,677.8 | | | $ | 525.2 | | | $ | 290.1 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 3,493.1 | | 2015 | | 2,581.6 | | | | 501.0 | | | | 312.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 3,394.8 | | 2014 | | 2,471.6 | | | | 535.2 | | | | 290.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 3,297.6 | | Income before Income Taxes(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | $ | 590.6 | | | $ | 66.3 | | | $ | 39.8 | | | $ | 9.2 | | | $ | 705.9 | | 2015 | | 529.4 | | | | 54.5 | | | | 57.3 | | | | (5.8 | ) | | | 635.4 | | 2014 | | 502.8 | | | | 64.7 | | | | 45.8 | | | | 11.6 | | | | 624.9 | |
(1) | Intersegment sales from Consumer International to Consumer Domestic, which are not reflected in the table, were $2.2, $3.4, $5.3 and $5.2$1.9 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. |
(2) | In determining income before income taxes, the Company allocated interest expense and investment earnings and other income (expense) were allocated among the segments based upon each segment’s relative Income from Operations. |
42
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) (3) | Corporate segment consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates from Armand and ArmaKleen in 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx.Natronx in 2015 and 2014. |
Product line revenues for external customers for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Household Products | | $ | 1,436.1 | | | $ | 1,411.3 | | | $ | 1,295.0 | | Personal Care Products | | | 977.4 | | | | 745.6 | | | | 684.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Consumer Domestic | | | 2,413.5 | | | | 2,156.9 | | | | 1,979.1 | | Total Consumer International | | | 532.8 | | | | 510.1 | | | | 509.1 | | Total SPD | | | 248.0 | | | | 254.9 | | | | 261.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Consolidated Net Sales | | $ | 3,194.3 | | | $ | 2,921.9 | | | $ | 2,749.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Household Products | | $ | 1,593.4 | | | $ | 1,544.3 | | | $ | 1,466.2 | | Personal Care Products | | | 1,084.4 | | | | 1,037.3 | | | | 1,005.4 | | Total Consumer Domestic | | | 2,677.8 | | | | 2,581.6 | | | | 2,471.6 | | Total Consumer International | | | 525.2 | | | | 501.0 | | | | 535.2 | | Total SPD | | | 290.1 | | | | 312.2 | | | | 290.8 | | Total Consolidated Net Sales | | $ | 3,493.1 | | | $ | 3,394.8 | | | $ | 3,297.6 | |
Household Products include deodorizing, cleaning and laundry products. Personal Care Products include condoms, pregnancy kits, oral care products, skin care products, hair care products and vitamin and mineralgummy dietary supplements. Consumer Domestic 20132016 compared to 20122015
Consumer Domestic net sales in 20132016 were $2,413.5,$2,677.8, an increase of $256.6$96.2 or 11.9%3.7% compared to net sales of $2,156.9$2,581.6 in 2012.2015. The components of the net sales change are the following: | | | | | Net Sales—Sales - Consumer Domestic | | December 31,
2013 2016 | | Product volumes sold | | 3.4 | 4.4 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | (0.3 | (2.5 | %) | AcquiredVolume from acquired product lines (1)
| | 0.6 | % | Net Sales increase | | 3.7 | % |
| (1) | | | 9.6 | % | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade
| | | 0.4 | % | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 11.9 | % | | | | | |
(1) | On October 1, 2012, the Company acquired the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business. NetIncludes net sales of thesethe brands acquired product lines subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s results.Toppik Acquisition since the date of acquisition. |
The increase in net sales for 2016, reflects sales from the gummy vitamin dietary supplement business and higher sales of ARM & HAMMER liquid laundry detergent,and unit dose detergents, VITAFUSION gummy vitamins, OXICLEAN laundry additives, TROJANadditive ARM & HAMMER Cat Litter products and FIRST RESPONSE diagnostic kits,BATISTE dry shampoo, partially offset by lower sales of XTRA laundry detergent and L’IL CRITTERS gummy vitamins. There continues to be significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category. For example, P&G markets a lower-priced line of laundry detergents, Simply Tide, which competes directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents. P&G has significantly increased its discounting of Simply Tide which could have a broad negative impact on the laundry category pricing and profitability. In addition, in 2016, Henkel entered the U.S. market with Persil, its leading worldwide premium laundry detergent, and on September 1, 2016 completed its acquisition of Sun Products, the maker of All, Wisk, Sun, and private label laundry detergents. While it is too early to assess what impact this will have on the Company’s laundry detergent business, the introduction of Persil and Henkel’s increased scale and market share could precipitate greater price competition in the category and distribution pressure with a potential adverse impact on the Company’s laundry detergent business. Moreover, the unit dose laundry detergent segment is the fastest growing segment in the laundry detergent category, having grown to approximately 16% of the category since the introduction of this form in 2012, and the Company faces pressure to achieve its proportionate share of the segment with a potential adverse impact on its share of the laundry detergent category. The Company continues to evaluate and vigorously combat these pressures through, among other things, new product introductions and increased marketing and trade spending. Additionally, while the category grew 3.3% for the 52 weeks ended December 17, 2016 and 1.6% for the 52 weeks ended December 19, 2015, after experiencing declines in 2013 and 2014, there is no assurance the category will not decline in the future and that the Company will be able to offset any such decline. Consumer Domestic income before income taxes for 2016 was $590.6, a $61.2 increase as compared to 2015. The increase is due primarily to the impact of higher sales volumes of $70.1, favorable commodity and manufacturing costs of $40.3, partially offset by higher SG&A costs of $24.7, unfavorable price/mix of $17.2, and higher marketing expenses of $8.7. 43
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) 2015 compared to 2014 Consumer Domestic net sales in 2015 were $2,581.6, an increase of $110.0 or 4.5% compared to net sales of $2,471.6 in 2014. The components of the net sales change are the following: Net Sales - Consumer Domestic | December 31, 2015 | | Product volumes sold | | 2.7 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 0.3 | % | Acquired product lines (1) | | 1.3 | % | Other | | 0.2 | % | Net Sales increase | | 4.5 | % |
| (1) | On September 19, 2014, the Company acquired certain feminine care brands from Lil’ Drug Store Products Inc. Net sales of the brands acquired in the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition are included in the Company’s results since the date of acquisition. |
The increase in net sales in 2015 includes sales from the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition, higher sales from the new product launches of ARM & HAMMER powder laundry detergent, XTRACLUMP & SEAL cat litter product lines including the new lightweight variant launched in December 2014, ARM & HAMMER liquid laundry detergent, and BATISTE dry shampoo and were offset by lower sales of SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes, TROJAN condoms and ARM & HAMMER cat litter. Sales in the first quarter of 2012 were negatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.XTRA laundry detergent. Since the 2012 introduction in the U.S. of unit dose laundry detergent by various manufacturers, including the Company, there has been significant product and price competition in the laundry detergent category. For example P&G markets a lower-priced line of laundry detergents that competes directly with the Company’s core value laundry detergents and Henkel has entered the U.S. market with Persil, its leading worldwide premium laundry detergent. While it is too early to assess what impact this will have on the premium laundry category contributing to an overall category decline. During 2012, the category declined by 0.6% and during 2013, the category declined an additional 3.2%. Whileor the Company’s laundry detergent sales have increased, more than offsettingbusiness, the introduction of Persil could precipitate greater price competition in the category and distribution pressure with a potential adverse impact ofon OXICLEAN laundry detergent. The Company continues to evaluate and vigorously combat the totalpressures in the laundry detergent category decline,through, among other things, new product introductions and increased marketing spending. While the category grew 1.6% in 2015 after experiencing declines in 2013 and 2014, there is no assurance that the category will not decline further orin the future and that the Company will be able to offset any such category decline. P&G, one Delays in the Company’s second quarter start-up of the Company’s major competitors andnew vitamin manufacturing facility resulted in the market leader in premium laundry detergent, has announced that in 2014need to place certain retailers on allocation, which contributed to increased retailer frustration. By the end of the year, these issues were mainly resolved. If the Company were to lose a significant customer or if any sales of its products were to materially decrease due to customer service levels or real or perceived product quality or appearance issues, it will launchcould have a lower-priced laundry detergent that may compete directly withmaterial adverse effect on the Company’s core value laundry detergents. This, together with expected ongoing weak consumer spendingbusiness, financial condition and increased price competition, could negatively impact the Company’s laundry detergent business. The Company plans to vigorously combat these pressures through, among other things, significant new product introductions such as the 2014 launchresults of an OXICLEAN premium priced laundry detergent, and increased marketing spending. However, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful.operations. Consumer Domestic income before income taxes for 20132015 was $501.0,$529.4, a $72.2$26.6 increase as compared to 2012.2014. The increase is due primarily to the contribution from the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business (net of higher interest expense), the impact of higher sales volumes and lower manufacturing costs resulting from productivity improvement projects,of $61.1 partially offset by higher trade promotion and couponSG&A costs the effect of unfavorable product mix$24.1 and higher marketing expenses of $3.3. Higher manufacturing costs of $6.0 include vitamin manufacturing start-up costs, which were partially offset by productivity programs and SG&A expenses.lower commodity costs. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESConsumer International
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
20122016 compared to 20112015
Consumer DomesticInternational net sales in 20122016 were $2,156.9,$525.2, an increase of $177.8$24.2 or 9.0 %4.8% as compared to net sales of $1,979.1 in 2011.2015. The components of the net sales change are the following: | | | | | Net Sales—Sales - Consumer DomesticInternational | | December 31,
2012 2016 | | Product volumes sold | | 7.3 | 8.2 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 2.7 | (1.9 | %) | AcquiredForeign exchange rate fluctuations
| | (6.0 | %) | Volume from acquired product lines(1) | | 0.8 | % | Net Sales increase | | 4.8 | % |
| (1) | | | 3.5 | % | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade
| | | (0.8 | %) | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 9.0 | % | | | | | |
(1) | On October 1, 2012, the Company acquired the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business. NetIncludes net sales of these product lines subsequent to the acquisition are includedbrands acquired in the Company’s segment results. (See Note 6 toToppik Acquisition since the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for further information.)date of acquisition. |
The increase44
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in net sales reflects sales frommillions, except share and per share data) Excluding the acquisitionimpact of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business andunfavorable foreign exchange rates, higher sales offor the year occurred in exports, Canada, Mexico, and Europe. The BATISTE, ARM & HAMMER, liquid laundry detergent, XTRA liquid laundry detergent, ARM & HAMMER cat litter, OXICLEAN, laundry additivesFEMFRESH, STERIMAR, and the recently introduced ARM & HAMMER CRYSTAL BURST unit dose laundry detergent. These increases were partially offset by lowerTROJAN brands had strong sales of ARM & HAMMER powder laundry detergent, SPINBRUSH battery-operated toothbrushes, ANSWER diagnostic kits and ARRID deodorant. Sales in the first quarter of 2012 were negatively impacted due to a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.growth. Consumer DomesticInternational income before income taxes for 2012 was $428.8, a $42.8$66.3 in 2016, an increase asof $11.8 compared to 2011. The increase is2015 due primarily to the impacthigher volumes of higher sales volumes,$23.4, favorable price/mix of $7.5 and lower SG&A of $1.4, partially offset by the effectunfavorable foreign exchange rates of unfavorable product mix and pricing$12.2, higher marketing costs of $6.2, and higher SG&A costs. Higher commodity and manufacturing costs were largely offset by productivity gains. The acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business did not materially impact income before income taxes due to$2.3. Last year’s results included an inventory step-up charge and interest expense offsetting the operating income of the business.$8.9 pension settlement charge. Consumer International
2013 2015 compared to 20122014
Consumer International net sales in 20132015 were $532.8, an increase$501.0, a decrease of $22.7$34.2 or 4.5%6.4% as compared to 2012.2014. The components of the net sales change are the following: | | | | | Net Sales—Sales - Consumer International | | December 31,
2013 2015 | | Product volumes sold | | 6.7 | 2.8 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 1.4 | 0.9 | % | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations / Other | | (15.5 | (2.3 | %) | Acquired product lines(1) | | 1.0 | % | Net Sales increase | | (6.4 | %) |
| (1) | | | 3.1 | % | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 4.5 | % | | | | | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
(1) | On October 1, 2012,September 19, 2014, the Company acquired the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business.certain feminine care brands from Lil’ Drug Store Products Inc. (“Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”). Net sales of these product lines subsequent to the acquisitionbrands acquired in the Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition are included in the Consumer International results.Company’s results since the date of acquisition. |
HigherThe decrease in Consumer International net sales in 2013 occurred2015 was primarily due to the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates in Mexico, Canada, Brazil, United Kingdom2015 compared to 2014, which offset higher sales in Europe, Australia and U.S. exports.Mexico.
Consumer International income before income taxes was $64.5$54.5 in 2013,2015, a decrease of $6.5$10.2 compared to 2012 caused by2014 due primarily to unfavorable foreign exchange rates a trade name impairmentof $20.8, an $8.9 pension settlement charge, and higher marketing expenses,costs of $7.3, as well as, higher trade promotion, commodity and marketing costs, partially offset by the contribution from the acquisitionhigher volumes of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business, higher sales volume$19.7 and favorable price/mix.mix of $6.1. 2012Specialty Products
2016 compared to 20112015 Consumer InternationalSPD net sales in 2012 were $510.1, an increase$290.1 for 2016, a decrease of $1.0$22.1, or 0.2% as7.1% compared to 2011.2015. The components of the net sales change are the following:
| | | | | Net Sales—Consumer InternationalSales – SPD | | December 31,
2012 2016 | | Product volumes sold | | (6.5 | 3.9 | %) | Pricing/Product mix | | (0.1 | (0.6 | %) | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations | | (0.5 | (3.3 | %) | Acquired product lines(1)Net Sales increase
| | | 3.1 | % | Change in fiscal calendar(2)
| | | (2.9 | %) | | | | | | Net Sales increase
| | | 0.2 | % | | | (7.1 | %) | |
(1) | On June 28, 2011, the Company acquired BATISTE dry shampoo. Net sales of this product line subsequent to the acquisition are included in the Company’s segment results. (See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for further information.) |
(2) | Beginning in 2012, the Company changed to a calendar year reporting basis. To facilitate this change, the fourth quarter of 2011 included an additional period of reporting for those three subsidiaries outside of North America that previously reported one month prior to period presented. This change increased 2011The net sales by $14.3 and had a nominal impact on net income for 2011. |
Higher sales volumesdecrease in 2012 occurred2016 reflects lower sales in the animal productivity business driven primarily by continued low milk prices and a strong year ago results comparison. The low milk prices are principally in Canada, United Kingdomdue to an excess global supply of milk and France. Higherweak exports due to a strong U.S. exports also contributed to the sales increase. The BATISTE acquisition contributed a full year of sales as compared to six months in 2011.dollar.
Consumer InternationalSPD income before income taxes was $71.0$39.8 in 2012, an increase2016, a decrease of $2.1$17.5 compared to 2011. Higher profits are attributable2015. The decrease in income before income taxes for 2016 is due primarily to higherlower sales volume of $8.7, a plant impairment charge of $4.9, higher manufacturing costs of $4.1, and contribution from the BATISTE acquisition,higher SG&A of $2.8 partially offset by higher commodity costs, unfavorable pricing and product mix and unfavorablelower other expense of $2.3 mainly as a result of foreign exchange rates.rate changes.
45
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) Specialty Products
20132015 compared to 20122014
SPD net sales were $248.0$312.2 for 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $6.9,$21.4, or 2.7% as7.3% compared to 2012.2014. The components of the net sales change are the following: | | | | | Net Sales—Sales – SPD | | December 31,
2013 2015 | | Product volumes sold | | 0.2 | 0.0 | % | Pricing/Product mix | | 0.5 | (1.8 | %) | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations | | (3.4 | (1.3 | %) | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgradeAcquired product lines (1)
| | | 0.4 | % | | | | 10.0 | % | Net Sales decreaseincrease | | | (2.7 | %) | | | | 7.3 | % |
| (1) | On January 2, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Varied Industries Corporation. Net sales are included in the Company’s results since the date of the VI-COR Acquisition. |
The sales decreaseincrease in 20132015 reflects reduced productthe impact of the VI-COR Acquisition, as well as, higher sales volume of animal nutritionperformance products partially offset by higher bulk sales of sodium bicarbonate. Colder than normal weather during the second quarter of 2013 negatively impacted demand from the dairy industry. In addition, the decrease in net sales of 2013 was offset by the adverse impact in the first quarter of 2012 of a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.lower animal nutrition products and foreign exchange fluctuations. SPD income before income taxes was $29.5$57.3 in 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $4.3 as$11.5 compared to 2012.2014. The decreaseincrease in the income before income taxes for 20132015 is due primarily to higher sales volume of $18.8 and lower selling prices for animal nutrition products,manufacturing costs of $10.1, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses. 2012 compared to 2011
SPD net sales were $254.9 for 2012, a decrease of $6.2, or 2.4% as compared to 2011. The components of the net sales change are the following:
| | | | | Net Sales—SPD
| | December 31,
2012 | | Product volumes sold
| | | (3.1 | %) | Pricing/Product mix
| | | 3.9 | % | Foreign exchange rate fluctuations
| | | (2.4 | %) | Sales in anticipation of information systems upgrade
| | | (0.8 | %) | | | | | | Net Sales decrease
| | | (2.4 | %) | | | | | |
The sales volume decrease in 2012 reflects reduced product sales of certain animal nutrition products, partially offset by higher pricing. The reduction in net sales is also due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates of $6.8, SG&A of $9.1 and the adverse impact in the first quarterhigher marketing expenses of 2012 of a timing shift in customer orders from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2011 in anticipation of the January 1, 2012 information systems upgrade in the U.S.$1.3.
SPD income before income taxes was $33.8 in 2012, an increase of $4.1 as compared to 2011. The increase in the income before income taxes for 2012 primarily reflects higher selling prices partially offset by lower sales volume, higher raw material costs of certain animal nutrition and performance products and foreign exchange rates.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Corporate The Corporate segment reflects the administrative costs of the production, planning and logistics functions which are included in SG&A expenses in the operating segments but are elements of cost of sales in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Such amounts were $31.3, $29.4,$36.6, $32.6 and $25.3$26.7 for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Also included in Corporatecorporate segment are the equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates from Armand and ArmaKleen in 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx.Natronx in 2015 and 2014. The reductionincrease in equity in earnings of affiliates in 20132016 is primarily due to a $3.2the $17.0 Natronx impairment charge associated with onerecorded in the second quarter of the Company’s investment in affiliates. The charge is the result of the Company’s assessment of the financial impact of the delay in anticipated discounted cash flows from the affiliate.2015. Liquidity and capital resources On December 4, 2015, the Company replaced its former $600.0 unsecured revolving credit facility with a $1,000.0 unsecured revolving credit facility (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has the ability to increase its borrowing up to an additional $600.0, subject to lender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes and are used to support the Company’s $1,000.0 commercial paper program (the “Program”). Unless extended, the Credit Agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on December 4, 2020. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had $496.9$187.8 in cash and cash equivalents, approximately $350$576.0 available through the revolving facility under its Credit Agreement and its commercial paper program, and a commitment increase feature under the Credit Agreement that enables the Company to borrow up to an additional $500,$600.0, subject to lending commitments of the participating lenders and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement. To preserve its liquidity, the Company invests its cash primarily in primegovernment money market funds and short term bank deposits.deposits. During 2015, the Company liquidated its subsidiary in the Netherlands and decided that the earnings of its subsidiary in France would no longer be permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. As a result, the Company repatriated cash of $93.0. The funds repatriated were used to reduce outstanding commercial paper. As a result of liquidating its subsidiary in the Netherlands, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $2.7 in the Consolidated Statement of Income and a deferred tax benefit of $11.6 through Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the second quarter of 2015. As of December 31, 2013, the amount2016, there remains $150.1 of cash and cash equivalents included in the Company’s assets, that was held by the foreign subsidiaries was approximately $231.1. If thesethat is considered to be permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. These funds are not needed for operations in the U.S., If they were, the Company willwould be required to accrue and pay taxes in the U.S. to repatriate these funds. However, theThe Company’s intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside the U.S., and the Company does not currently expect to repatriate them to fund operationsU.S. operations. 46
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) On December 9, 2014, the U.S.Company issued $300.0 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due December 15, 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The 2019 Notes were issued under the first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 9, 2014, to the indenture dated December 9, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. Interest on the 2019 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning June 15, 2015. The 2019 Notes will mature on December 15, 2019, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the First Supplemental Indenture. On September 26, 2012, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $400issued $400.0 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes were issued under the second supplemental indenture, (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”), dated September 26, 2012 (the “BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture”) to the indenture dated December 15, 2010 (the “BNY Mellon Base Indenture”) between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. Interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginning April 1, 2013. The 2022 Notes will mature on October 1, 2022, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture. The Company used $250 from commercial paper issuances, along with the $400 of 2022 Notes and cash, to purchase the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business on October 1, 2012. On December 15, 2010, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of $250 aggregate principal amount of 3.35% senior notes due 2015 (the “2015 Notes”). The 2015 Notes were issued under (the “Base Indenture”), and a first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 15, 2010, between the Company and BNY Mellon, as trustee. On December 30, 2010, the proceeds of the offering were utilized to retire the outstanding $250 principal amount of the Company’s 6% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. Interest on the 2015 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2011. The 2015 Notes will mature on December 15, 2015, unless earlier retired or redeemed pursuant to the terms of the First Supplemental Indenture.
The current economic environment presents risks that could have adverse consequences for the Company’s liquidity. (See “Unfavorable economic conditions could adversely affect demand for the Company’s products” under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.) The Company does not anticipate that current economic conditions will adversely affect its ability to comply with the financial covenantscovenant in the Credit Agreement CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
because the Company currently is, and anticipates that it will continue to be, in compliance with the minimum interest coverage ratio requirement and the maximum leverage ratio requirement under the Credit Agreement. These financial ratios are discussed in more detail in this section under “Certain Financial Covenants.” On January 30, 2013, the Board increased the Company’s regular quarterly dividend from $0.24 per share to $0.28 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $1.12 per share, commencing with the dividend payable on March 1, 2013 to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 15, 2013. The higher dividend raised the Company’s annualized dividend payout from approximately $135 to approximately $155. On January 29, 2014,7, 2017, the Board declared an 11%a 7% increase in the regular quarterly dividend from $0.28$0.1775 to $0.31$0.19 per share, equivalent to an annual dividend of $1.24$0.76 per share or a current dividend yieldpayable to stockholders of approximately 1.9% per share.record as of February 21, 2017. The decisionincrease raises the annual dividend payout from $155$183 to approximately $170.$195, and maintains the Company’s payout of dividends relative to net income at approximately 40%. On January 29, 2014,November 2, 2016, the Board authorized a new share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $500 million$500.0 in shares of Common Stock. ThisStock (the “2016 Share Repurchase Program”). The 2016 Share Repurchase Program does not have an expiration and replaced the 2015 Share Repurchase Program. The Company also continued its evergreen share repurchase program, replaces the Company’s share repurchase program previously announced on November 5, 2012. In 2013, the Company purchased 0.9 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $50 million under the previous share purchase authorization, which is now terminated. In addition,authorized by the Board authorized a new evergreen share repurchase program,on January 29, 2014, under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, the Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans. As partIn 2016, the Company purchased approximately 9.0 million shares of Common Stock for $400.0, of which $103.0 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase programs, in February 2014,program, $200.0 was purchased under the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase contract with2016 Share Repurchase Program, and $97.0 was purchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program. As a commercial bank to purchase $140 millionresult of the Company’s common stock. The Company paid $140 million topurchases, there remained $300.0 under the bank, inclusive2016 Share Repurchase Program as of fees, and received an initial delivery of approximately 2 million shares, which reduced the Company’s shares outstanding. The Company used cash on hand to fund the initial purchase price. The total amount of shares to be ultimately delivered by the bank will be determined by the average price per share paid by the bank during the purchase period, which is expected to end in mid-May 2014.
As of the filing of this Annual Report, the Company has made no purchases in 2014 other than those pursuant to the ASR described above.December 31, 2016.
The Company anticipates that its cash from operations, together with its current borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to meet its capital expenditure program costs, which are expected to be approximately $85.0$55.0 in 2014,2017, fund its share repurchase programprograms to the extent implemented by management and pay dividends at the latest approved rate. Cash, together with the Company’s current borrowing capacity, may be used for acquisitions that would complement the Company’s existing product lines or geographic markets. The Company diddoes not have any mandatory fixed rate debt principal payments in 20132017. Cash Flow Analysis | Year Ended | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 655.3 | | | $ | 606.1 | | | $ | 540.3 | | Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (354.6 | ) | | $ | (141.2 | ) | | $ | (288.4 | ) | Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (439.6 | ) | | $ | (535.0 | ) | | $ | (306.6 | ) |
2016 compared to 2015 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities – The Company’s primary source of liquidity is its cash flow provided by operating activities, which is dependent on the level of net income and will not have anychanges in 2014. Net Debtworking capital. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities in 2016 increased by $49.2 to $655.3 as compared to $606.1 in 2015 due to a reduction in working capital and higher cash earnings (net income plus non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization, non-cash compensation and asset impairment charges). The change in working capital is primarily due to higher accounts receivable, including the impact of factoring
The Company had outstanding total debt of $803.3 and cash of $496.9 at December 31, 2013, resulting in net debt of $306.4 at December 31, 2013. This compares to total debt of $903.2 and cash of $343.0, resulting in net debt of $560.2 at December 31, 2012. Net debt is defined as cash less total debt.47
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) Cash Flow Analysis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ending December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 499.6 | | | $ | 523.6 | | | $ | 437.8 | | Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (77.1 | ) | | $ | (741.3 | ) | | $ | (147.8 | ) | Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | $ | (259.8 | ) | | $ | 305.2 | | | $ | (226.5 | ) |
2013 comparedan additional $22.3 to 2012
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities—The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 decreased $24.0 to $499.6 as compared to 2012. The Company was able to defer its fourth quarter 2012 federal tax payment of $36.0 to the first quarter of 2013 as allowed by the IRS due to the impact of Hurricane Sandy, which accounted for thea bank, a decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in 2013. Partially offsetting the decrease was a reduction in working capital (higherinventories and higher accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offsetexpenses. The Company measures working capital effectiveness based on its cash conversion cycle. The following table presents the Company’s cash conversion cycle information for the quarters ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
| As of | | | | | | | December 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | | | Change | | Days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable ("DSO") | | 30 | | | | 33 | | | | (3 | ) | Days of inventory outstanding ("DIO") | | 51 | | | | 50 | | | | 1 | | Days of accounts payable outstanding ("DPO") | | 60 | | | | 56 | | | | (4 | ) | Cash conversion cycle | | 21 | | | | 27 | | | | (6 | ) |
The Company's cash conversion cycle (defined as the sum of DSO and DIO less DPO) which is calculated using a 2 period average method, improved 6 days from the prior year amount of 27 days to 21 days at December 31, 2016 due primarily to improved DSO of 3 days from 33 to 30 days due to factoring. DIO increased 1 day from 50 to 51 days. DPO improved by higher accounts receivable).4 days as the Company continues to extend payment terms with its suppliers. The improvement in the Company's cash conversion cycle reflects the Company's continued focus on reducing its average working capital requirements.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities— – Net cash used in investing activities during 20132016 was $77.1,$354.6, principally reflecting $67.1 of$305.3 for acquisitions and $49.8 for property, plant and equipment expenditures and a $6.4 investment in Natronx.expenditures.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)Used in Financing Activities— – Net cash used in financing activities during 20132016 was $259.8,$439.6, primarily reflecting $100.0 of repayments of commercial paper, $50.1$400.0 of repurchases of the Company’s Common Stock and $155.2$183.0 of cash dividends,dividend payments, partially offset by $35.1$80.5 of proceeds and tax benefits from stock option exercises, and the receipt$65.5 of additional commercial paper borrowings, and an incentive paymentadditional $3.4 of $10.9 related to the financing lease for the Company’s new corporate headquarters.short term borrowings at an international subsidiary. 20122015 compared to 20112014
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities— – The Company’s primary source of liquidity is the strong cash flow provided by operating activities, which is dependent on the level of net income and changes in working capital. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities in 20122015 increased $85.8by $65.8 to $523.6 as$606.1 compared to 2011.2014 due to higher cash earnings (net income plus non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization, non-cash compensation and asset impairment charges) and lower working capital. The increase wasdecrease in working capital is primarily due to an improvement in working capital. Working capital was favorably impacted duelower accounts receivable as a result of factoring $37.8 to the deferral of the Company’s fourth quarter 2012 federal tax payment of approximately $36.0 as allowed by the IRS due to the impact of Hurricane Sandy, contributions from the Avid Health acquisitiona bank and smaller increases inhigher accounts receivablepayable and accrued expenses due to the timing of invoice payments. This was partially offset by higher inventory in support of higher sales. The Company measures working capital effectiveness based on its cash collections.conversion cycle. The Company's cash conversion cycle (defined as days in accounts receivable plus days in inventory less days in accounts payable) which is calculated using a 2 period average method, improved 5 days from the prior year amount of 32 days to 27 days at December 31, 2015 due primarily to improved accounts receivable of 4 days and accounts payable of 2 days. Inventory increased 1 day from 49 to 50 days. The improvement in the Company's cash conversion cycle reflects the Company's continued focus on reducing its average working capital requirements.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities— – Net cash used in investing activities during 20122015 was $741.3,$141.2, principally reflecting $74.9 for the $652.3 acquisition of Avid Health, $74.5 ofVI-COR Acquisition and $61.8 for property, plant and equipment expenditures, relating in part due to the Victorville Facility, and a $13.7 investmentCompany’s new gummy dietary supplement manufacturing facility in Natronx.York, Pennsylvania.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)Used in Financing Activities— – Net cash provided byused in financing activities during 20122015 was $305.2, principally$535.0, primarily reflecting $399.6$363.1 of 2022 Notes (netrepurchases of discount),Common Stock, $175.3 of cash dividend payments and repayment of a $250.0 ofbond that matured in 2015, partially offset by higher commercial paper issued in connection with the acquisitionand short term borrowings of Avid Health, $42.6$211.7 and $44.3 of proceeds and tax benefits from stock option exercises, partially offset by $250.4 of common stock repurchases, $134.5 of cash dividends and deferred financing costs of $3.4.exercises. 48
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) Certain Financial Covenants
“Consolidated EBITDA” (referred to below as “Adjusted EBITDA” and defined in the Credit Agreement) is a component of the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. Such financial covenants include a leverage ratio (total debt to Adjusted EBITDA) and an interest coverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA to total interest expense), which, if not met, could result in an event of default and trigger the early termination of the Credit Agreement. Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The Company’s leverage ratio for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 was 1.2, which is below the maximum of 3.25 permitted under the Credit Agreement, and the interest coverage ratio for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 was 28.3, which is above the minimum of 3.0 required under the Credit Agreement.
The reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure) to Adjusted EBITDA for 2013 is as follows:
| | | | | Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | $ | 499.6 | | Interest paid | | | 26.4 | | Current Income Tax Provision | | | 192.3 | | Excess Tax Benefit on Stock Options Exercised | | | 13.1 | | Change in Working Capital and Other Liabilities | | | 16.1 | | | | | | | Adjusted EBITDA (per Credit Agreement) | | $ | 747.5 | | | | | | |
Commitments as of December 31, 20132016 The table below summarizes the Company’s material contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2013.2016. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Payments Due by Period | | | | | Total | | | 2014 | | | 2015 to
2016 | | | 2017 to
2018 | | | After
2018 | | Short & Long-Term Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.35% Senior Notes due 2015 | | $ | 250.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 250.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022 | | | 400.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 400.0 | | Commercial paper issuances | | | 150.0 | | | | 150.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Debt obligations of foreign subsidiaries | | | 3.8 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 803.8 | | | | 153.8 | | | | 250.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 400.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest on Fixed Rate Debt(1) | | | 120.3 | | | | 19.9 | | | | 31.4 | | | | 23.0 | | | | 46.0 | | Lease Obligations | | | 216.6 | | | | 27.2 | | | | 42.7 | | | | 33.7 | | | | 113.0 | | Other Long-Term Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds(2) | | | 5.1 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Pension Contributions(3) | | | 3.4 | | | | 3.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Purchase Obligations(4) | | | 261.2 | | | | 191.2 | | | | 52.5 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 7.3 | | Other(5) | | | 10.5 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 8.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 1,420.9 | | | $ | 401.1 | | | $ | 377.6 | | | $ | 67.9 | | | $ | 574.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 to | | | 2020 to | | | After | | | | Total | | | 2017 | | | 2019 | | | 2021 | | | 2021 | | Short & Long-Term Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.45% Senior Notes due 2019 | | $ | 300.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 300.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022 | | | 400.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 400.0 | | Commercial paper issuances | | | 420.0 | | | | 420.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Debt obligations of foreign subsidiaries | | | 6.8 | | | | 6.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | 1,126.8 | | | | 426.8 | | | | 300.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 400.0 | | Interest on Fixed Rate Debt(1) | | | 87.9 | | | | 18.9 | | | | 37.4 | | | | 23.0 | | | | 8.6 | | Lease Obligations | | | 178.6 | | | | 24.3 | | | | 43.2 | | | | 30.4 | | | | 80.7 | | Other Long-Term Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds(2) | | | 3.9 | | | | 3.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Purchase Obligations(3) | | | 214.9 | | | | 141.5 | | | | 63.1 | | | | 10.3 | | | | 0.0 | | Other(4) | | | 9.0 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 6.5 | | Total | | $ | 1,621.1 | | | $ | 615.9 | | | $ | 444.7 | | | $ | 64.7 | | | $ | 495.8 | |
(1) | Represents interest on the Company’s 3.35%2.45% Senior Notes due in 20152019 and 2.875% Senior Notes due in 2022. |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
(2) | Letters of credit with several banks guarantee payment for items such as insurance claims in the event of the Company’s insolvency and one year of rent on a warehouse.insolvency. Performance bonds are principally for required municipal property improvements. |
(3) | Pension contributions are based on actuarial assessments of government regulated employer funding requirements. These requirements are not projected beyond one year since they fluctuate with the change in plan assets, assumptions and demographics. |
(4) | The Company has outstanding purchase obligations with suppliers at the end of 20132016 for raw, packaging and other materials and services in the normal course of business. These purchase obligation amounts represent only those items which are based on agreements that are enforceable and legally binding, and do not represent total anticipated purchases. |
(5)(4) | Other includes payments for stadium naming rights for a period of 20 years until December 2032. |
The Company has excluded from the table above uncertain tax liabilities due to the uncertainty of the amount per period of payment. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has gross uncertain tax liabilities, including interest, of $6.3. (See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report).
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company does not have off-balance sheet financing or unconsolidated special purpose entities. OTHER ITEMS Market risk Concentration of Risk A group of three customers accounted for approximately 35%, 34%35% and 33%36% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, of which a single customer, Wal-Mart, accounted for approximately 24%, 24% and 23%25% in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011, respectively.2014, respectively. Interest Rate Risk The Company had outstanding total debt at December 31, 20132016, of $803.3,$1,120.2, net of debt issuance costs, of which 81%62% has a fixed weighted average interest rate of 3.06%2.7% and the remaining 19%38% constituted principally commercial paper issued by the Company that currently has ana weighted average interest rate of less than 0.4%approximately 1.0%. The Company periodically considers entering into derivative financial instruments contracts to reduce interest rate risk exposure. Diesel Fuel Hedges
The Company uses independent freight carriers to deliver its products. These carriers charge the Company a basic rate per mile that is subject to a mileage surcharge for diesel fuel price increases. During 2012 and 2013,In December 2014, the Company entered into hedgeinterest rate swap agreements with financial counterpartieson an aggregate notional amount of $300.0 to mitigateconvert the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges, and notfixed interest rate on the 2019 Notes to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel. Under the hedge agreements, the Company agreed to pay a fixed price per gallon of diesel fuel determined at the time the agreements were executed and to receive a floating rate payment reflecting the variable common carriers’ mileage surcharge. The floating rate payment is determined onof three-month LIBOR plus a monthly basis based on the average pricefixed spread of the Department of Energy’s Diesel Fuel Index during the applicable month and is designed to offset any increase or decrease in fuel surcharges that the Company pays to it common carriers. The agreements covered approximately 45% of the Company’s 2013 diesel fuel requirements and are expected to cover approximately 34% of the Company’s estimated diesel fuel requirements for 2014. These diesel fuel hedge agreements qualify for hedge0.756%.
49
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.INC AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except share and per share data) accounting. Therefore, changes in the fair value of such agreements are recorded under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on the balance sheet.
Foreign CurrencyMarket Risks
The Company is also subject to exposure frommarket risks relating to its diesel fuel costs, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily U.S. Dollar/Euro, U.S. Dollar/British Pound, U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Mexican Peso, U.S. Dollar/Australian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Brazilian Real and U.S. Dollar/Chinese Yuan. The Company, from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in the U.S. Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound and Euro. The Company entered into forward exchange contracts to protect it from the risk that, due to changes in currency exchange rates, it would be adversely affected by net cash outflows. The face value of the unexpired contracts as of December 31, 2013 totaled $25.6. The contracts qualified as foreign currency cash flow hedges, and, therefore, changes in the fair valuemarket price of the contracts were recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Common Stock. Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these market risks and reclassifiedthe derivatives used to earnings whenmanage the hedged transaction affected earnings.
Equity Derivatives
The Company has entered into equity derivative contracts covering its own stock in order to minimize its liability, resulting from changes in quoted fair values of Company stock, to participants in its Executive Deferred Compensation Plan who have investments under that plan in a notional Company stock fund. The contracts are typically settled in cash. Sincerisks associated with changing diesel fuel prices, foreign exchange rates and the equity derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting, the Company is required to mark the agreements to market throughout the lifeprice of the agreements and record changes in fair value in the consolidated statement of income.Company’s common stock.
ITEMITEM 7A.
| QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
This information appears under the heading “Market Risk” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section. Refer to page 4749 of this Annual Report.
ITEMITEM 8.
| FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Management of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2016. In making this assessment, management used the framework established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, havehas audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Their opinions on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedulesschedule appear on pages 5052 and 5153 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ JAMES R. CRAIGIE | | | | /s/ MATTHEW T. FARRELL | James R. Craigie | | | | Matthew T. Farrell | | /s/ Richard A. Dierker | ChairmanMatthew T. Farrell | | Richard A. Dierker | President and Chief Executive Officer | | Executive Vice President | | | and Chief Financial Officer | | | (Principal Financial Officer) | February 24, 2017 | | |
February 21, 2014
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Ewing, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries atas of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (1992) (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 201424, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP | | /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP | | Parsippany, NJ | February 21, 2014 |
February 24, 2017
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Ewing, New Jersey We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (1992) (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’scompany's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’scompany's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (1992) (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 20132016 of the Company and our report dated February 21, 201424, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule. | | /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP | | Parsippany, NJ | February 21, 2014 |
Parsippany, NJ February 24, 2017
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In millions, except per share data) | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Net Sales | | $ | 3,493.1 | | | $ | 3,394.8 | | | $ | 3,297.6 | | Cost of sales | | | 1,902.5 | | | | 1,883.0 | | | | 1,844.7 | | Gross Profit | | | 1,590.6 | | | | 1,511.8 | | | | 1,452.9 | | Marketing expenses | | | 427.2 | | | | 417.5 | | | | 416.9 | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 439.2 | | | | 420.1 | | | | 394.8 | | Income from Operations | | | 724.2 | | | | 674.2 | | | | 641.2 | | Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates | | | 9.2 | | | | (5.8 | ) | | | 11.6 | | Investment earnings | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 2.3 | | Other income (expense), net | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (4.0 | ) | | | (2.8 | ) | Interest expense | | | (27.7 | ) | | | (30.5 | ) | | | (27.4 | ) | Income before Income Taxes | | | 705.9 | | | | 635.4 | | | | 624.9 | | Income taxes | | | 246.9 | | | | 225.0 | | | | 211.0 | | Net Income | | $ | 459.0 | | | $ | 410.4 | | | $ | 413.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic | | | 257.6 | | | | 262.2 | | | | 270.2 | | Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted | | | 262.1 | | | | 267.2 | | | | 275.0 | | Net income per share - Basic | | $ | 1.78 | | | $ | 1.57 | | | $ | 1.53 | | Net income per share - Diluted | | $ | 1.75 | | | $ | 1.54 | | | $ | 1.51 | | Cash dividends per share | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.62 | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In millions) | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Net Income | | $ | 459.0 | | | $ | 410.4 | | | $ | 413.9 | | Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange translation adjustments | | | (11.5 | ) | | | (22.1 | ) | | | (29.1 | ) | Defined benefit plan adjustments gain (loss) | | | (1.7 | ) | | | 6.2 | | | | (4.7 | ) | Income (loss) from derivative agreements | | | (4.7 | ) | | | 4.7 | | | | (1.1 | ) | Other comprehensive (loss) income | | | (17.9 | ) | | | (11.2 | ) | | | (34.9 | ) | Comprehensive income | | $ | 441.1 | | | $ | 399.2 | | | $ | 379.0 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Net Sales | | $ | 3,194.3 | | | $ | 2,921.9 | | | $ | 2,749.3 | | Cost of sales | | | 1,756.3 | | | | 1,630.5 | | | | 1,534.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Gross Profit | | | 1,438.0 | | | | 1,291.4 | | | | 1,214.5 | | Marketing expenses | | | 399.8 | | | | 357.3 | | | | 354.1 | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 416.0 | | | | 389.0 | | | | 367.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Income from Operations | | | 622.2 | | | | 545.1 | | | | 492.6 | | Equity in earnings of affiliates | | | 2.8 | | | | 8.9 | | | | 10.0 | | Investment earnings | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.9 | | Other income (expense), net | | | (2.1 | ) | | | 0.8 | | | | (1.2 | ) | Interest expense | | | (27.7 | ) | | | (14.0 | ) | | | (8.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Income before Income Taxes | | | 597.8 | | | | 542.5 | | | | 494.6 | | Income taxes | | | 203.4 | | | | 192.7 | | | | 185.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Income | | $ | 394.4 | | | $ | 349.8 | | | $ | 309.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic | | | 138.6 | | | | 140.1 | | | | 143.2 | | Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted | | | 141.2 | | | | 142.7 | | | | 145.8 | | Net income per share—Basic | | $ | 2.85 | | | $ | 2.50 | | | $ | 2.16 | | Net income per share—Diluted | | $ | 2.79 | | | $ | 2.45 | | | $ | 2.12 | | Cash dividends per share | | $ | 1.12 | | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 0.68 | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Assets | | | | | | | | | Current Assets | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 187.8 | | | $ | 330.0 | | Accounts receivable, less allowances of $2.1 and $1.0 | | | 287.0 | | | | 276.2 | | Inventories | | | 258.2 | | | | 274.0 | | Other current assets | | | 23.8 | | | | 25.8 | | Total Current Assets | | | 756.8 | | | | 906.0 | | | | | | | | | | | Property, Plant and Equipment, Net | | | 588.6 | | | | 609.6 | | Equity Investment in Affiliates | | | 8.5 | | | | 8.4 | | Trade Names and Other Intangibles, Net | | | 1,431.8 | | | | 1,269.5 | | Goodwill | | | 1,444.1 | | | | 1,354.9 | | Other Assets | | | 124.3 | | | | 108.5 | | Total Assets | | $ | 4,354.1 | | | $ | 4,256.9 | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | | Short-term borrowings | | $ | 426.8 | | | $ | 357.2 | | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 568.9 | | | | 508.3 | | Income taxes payable | | | 6.2 | | | | 7.2 | | Total Current Liabilities | | | 1,001.9 | | | | 872.7 | | | | | | | | | | | Long-term Debt | | | 693.4 | | | | 692.8 | | Deferred Income Taxes | | | 512.2 | | | | 484.8 | | Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities | | | 168.7 | | | | 183.4 | | Total Liabilities | | | 2,376.2 | | | | 2,233.7 | | | | | | | | | | | Commitments and Contingencies | | | | | | | | | Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, Authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Common Stock, $1.00 par value, Authorized 300,000,000 shares; 292,855,100 shares issued | | | 292.8 | | | | 292.8 | | Additional paid-in capital | | | 251.4 | | | | 230.0 | | Retained earnings | | | 2,926.0 | | | | 2,650.0 | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (63.8 | ) | | | (45.9 | ) | Common stock in treasury, at cost: 38,892,165 shares in 2016 and 32,947,012 shares in 2015 | | | (1,428.5 | ) | | | (1,103.7 | ) | Total Stockholders' Equity | | | 1,977.9 | | | | 2,023.2 | | Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 4,354.1 | | | $ | 4,256.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Net Income | | $ | 394.4 | | | $ | 349.8 | | | $ | 309.6 | | Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange translation adjustments | | | (10.1 | ) | | | 5.6 | | | | (7.3 | ) | Defined benefit plan adjustments | | | 7.5 | | | | (5.2 | ) | | | (7.3 | ) | Income (Losses) from derivative agreements | | | 0.3 | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | 1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (2.3 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (13.4 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Comprehensive income | | $ | 392.1 | | | $ | 349.4 | | | $ | 296.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | | Assets | | | | | | | | | Current Assets | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 496.9 | | | $ | 343.0 | | Accounts receivable, less allowances of $0.8 and $0.8 | | | 330.2 | | | | 303.1 | | Inventories | | | 250.5 | | | | 242.2 | | Deferred income taxes | | | 16.6 | | | | 17.6 | | Other current assets | | | 21.6 | | | | 27.9 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Current Assets | | | 1,115.8 | | | | 933.8 | | | | | | | | | | | Property, Plant and Equipment, Net | | | 594.1 | | | | 586.0 | | Equity Investment in Affiliates | | | 24.5 | | | | 23.0 | | Tradenames and Other Intangibles | | | 1,204.3 | | | | 1,254.9 | | Goodwill | | | 1,222.2 | | | | 1,213.8 | | Other Assets | | | 98.8 | | | | 86.6 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Assets | | $ | 4,259.7 | | | $ | 4,098.1 | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | | Short-term borrowings | | $ | 153.8 | | | $ | 253.8 | | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 495.1 | | | | 432.0 | | Income taxes payable | | | 2.3 | | | | 39.8 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Current Liabilities | | | 651.2 | | | | 725.6 | | | | | | | | | | | Long-term Debt | | | 649.5 | | | | 649.4 | | Deferred Income Taxes | | | 476.0 | | | | 470.0 | | Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities | | | 157.5 | | | | 141.1 | | Pension, Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits | | | 25.5 | | | | 50.9 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Liabilities | | | 1,959.7 | | | | 2,037.0 | | | | | | | | | | | Commitments and Contingencies | | | | | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, | | | | | | | | | Authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Common Stock, $1.00 par value, | | | | | | | | | Authorized 300,000,000 shares; 146,427,550 shares issued | | | 146.4 | | | | 146.4 | | Additional paid-in capital | | | 352.9 | | | | 318.8 | | Retained earnings | | | 2,168.5 | | | | 1,929.3 | | Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 0.2 | | | | 2.5 | | Common stock in treasury, at cost: | | | | | | | | | 7,462,913 shares in 2013 and 7,646,419 shares in 2012 | | | (368.1 | ) | | | (336.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | | Total Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stockholders’ Equity | | | 2,299.9 | | | | 2,060.9 | | Noncontrolling interest | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 2,300.0 | | | | 2,061.1 | | | | | | | | | | | Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 4,259.7 | | | $ | 4,098.1 | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Cash Flow From Operating Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Income | | $ | 394.4 | | | $ | 349.8 | | | $ | 309.6 | | Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation expense | | | 59.7 | | | | 56.0 | | | | 49.8 | | Amortization expense | | | 30.8 | | | | 29.0 | | | | 27.3 | | Deferred income taxes | | | 11.1 | | | | 13.2 | | | | 59.4 | | Equity in net earnings of affiliates | | | (2.8 | ) | | | (8.9 | ) | | | (10.0 | ) | Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates | | | 7.7 | | | | 10.3 | | | | 10.5 | | Non cash compensation expense | | | 17.0 | | | | 12.4 | | | | 11.0 | | Asset impairment charges and other asset write-offs | | | 8.4 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 3.1 | | Other | | | 2.5 | | | | (1.1 | ) | | | 0.2 | | Change in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accounts receivable | | | (31.2 | ) | | | (9.0 | ) | | | (35.3 | ) | Inventories | | | (7.3 | ) | | | (1.1 | ) | | | (9.0 | ) | Other current assets | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 2.0 | | | | (6.1 | ) | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 67.9 | | | | 30.7 | | | | 27.4 | | Income taxes payable | | | (23.8 | ) | | | 58.7 | | | | 19.1 | | Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised | | | (13.1 | ) | | | (14.6 | ) | | | (12.1 | ) | Other operating assets and liabilities, net | | | (20.2 | ) | | | (5.9 | ) | | | (7.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities | | | 499.6 | | | | 523.6 | | | | 437.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Flow From Investing Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (67.1 | ) | | | (74.5 | ) | | | (76.6 | ) | Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | 0.0 | | | | (652.3 | ) | | | (69.1 | ) | Investment interest in joint venture | | | (6.4 | ) | | | (13.7 | ) | | | (3.2 | ) | Other | | | (3.6 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | 1.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | | (77.1 | ) | | | (741.3 | ) | | | (147.8 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash Flow From Financing Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Long-term debt borrowings | | | 0.0 | | | | 399.6 | | | | 0.0 | | Short-term debt, net of repayments | | | (99.4 | ) | | | 251.3 | | | | (87.4 | ) | Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 22.0 | | | | 28.0 | | | | 27.1 | | Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised | | | 13.1 | | | | 14.6 | | | | 12.1 | | Payment of cash dividends | | | (155.2 | ) | | | (134.5 | ) | | | (97.4 | ) | Purchase of treasury stock | | | (50.1 | ) | | | (250.4 | ) | | | (80.2 | ) | Lease incentive proceeds | | | 10.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Lease principal payments | | | (1.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Deferred financing costs | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.4 | ) | | | (0.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities | | | (259.8 | ) | | | 305.2 | | | | (226.5 | ) | Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | (8.8 | ) | | | 4.1 | | | | (1.3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Change In Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | 153.9 | | | | 91.6 | | | | 62.2 | | Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | 343.0 | | | | 251.4 | | | | 189.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | $ | 496.9 | | | $ | 343.0 | | | $ | 251.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW—CONTINUEDFLOW (In millions) | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Cash Flow From Operating Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Income | | $ | 459.0 | | | $ | 410.4 | | | $ | 413.9 | | Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation expense | | | 59.7 | | | | 58.3 | | | | 57.1 | | Amortization expense | | | 47.9 | | | | 42.7 | | | | 34.1 | | Deferred income taxes | | | 24.9 | | | | 24.0 | | | | 12.7 | | Equity in net earnings of affiliates | | | (9.2 | ) | | | (11.6 | ) | | | (11.6 | ) | Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates | | | 9.0 | | | | 12.0 | | | | 12.5 | | Non-cash pension settlement charge | | | 0.0 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 0.0 | | Non-cash compensation expense | | | 16.0 | | | | 16.1 | | | | 17.0 | | Asset impairment charge and other asset write-offs | | | 5.6 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 6.4 | | Other | | | (1.8 | ) | | | 5.7 | | | | 3.2 | | Change in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accounts receivable | | | (12.7 | ) | | | 33.5 | | | | (1.8 | ) | Inventories | | | 19.2 | | | | (38.5 | ) | | | 1.8 | | Other current assets | | | 2.1 | | | | (2.0 | ) | | | (0.6 | ) | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 50.5 | | | | 21.8 | | | | 2.4 | | Income taxes payable | | | 32.8 | | | | 29.7 | | | | 17.5 | | Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised | | | (30.0 | ) | | | (15.8 | ) | | | (18.5 | ) | Other operating assets and liabilities, net | | | (17.7 | ) | | | (7.8 | ) | | | (5.8 | ) | Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities | | | 655.3 | | | | 606.1 | | | | 540.3 | | Cash Flow From Investing Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additions to property, plant and equipment | | | (49.8 | ) | | | (61.8 | ) | | | (70.5 | ) | Acquisitions | | | (305.3 | ) | | | (74.9 | ) | | | (215.7 | ) | Other | | | 0.5 | | | | (4.5 | ) | | | (2.2 | ) | Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | | (354.6 | ) | | | (141.2 | ) | | | (288.4 | ) | Cash Flow From Financing Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Long-term debt borrowings | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 299.8 | | Long-term debt (repayments) | | | 0.0 | | | | (250.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | Short-term debt borrowings (repayments) | | | 68.9 | | | | 211.7 | | | | (6.7 | ) | Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 50.5 | | | | 28.5 | | | | 32.7 | | Excess tax benefit on stock options exercised | | | 30.0 | | | | 15.8 | | | | 18.5 | | Payment of cash dividends | | | (183.0 | ) | | | (175.3 | ) | | | (167.5 | ) | Purchase of treasury stock | | | (400.0 | ) | | | (363.1 | ) | | | (478.8 | ) | Deferred financing costs | | | 0.0 | | | | (1.4 | ) | | | (4.2 | ) | Other | | | (6.0 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | Net Cash Used In Financing Activities | | | (439.6 | ) | | | (535.0 | ) | | | (306.6 | ) | Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | (3.3 | ) | | | (22.9 | ) | | | (19.2 | ) | Net Change In Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (142.2 | ) | | | (93.0 | ) | | | (73.9 | ) | Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | 330.0 | | | | 423.0 | | | | 496.9 | | Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | $ | 187.8 | | | $ | 330.0 | | | $ | 423.0 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW-CONTINUED (Dollars inIn millions) | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest (net of amounts capitalized) | | $ | 25.6 | | | $ | 29.0 | | | $ | 25.7 | | Income taxes | | $ | 188.4 | | | $ | 174.8 | | | $ | 181.5 | | Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in Accounts Payable | | $ | 3.4 | | | $ | 5.3 | | | $ | 14.5 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (In millions) | Number of Shares | | | Amounts | | | Common Stock | | | Treasury Stock | | | Common Stock | | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | | Retained Earnings | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stockholders' Equity | | | Noncontrolling Interest | | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | December 31, 2013 | | 292.8 | | | | (15.0 | ) | | $ | 292.8 | | | $ | 206.5 | | | $ | 2,168.5 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | (368.1 | ) | | $ | 2,299.9 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 2,300.0 | | Net income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 413.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 413.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 413.9 | | Other comprehensive (loss) income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0 | | | | (34.9 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (34.9 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (34.9 | ) | Cash dividends | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (167.5 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (167.5 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (167.5 | ) | Stock purchases | | 0.0 | | | | (13.8 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (478.8 | ) | | | (478.8 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (478.8 | ) | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $18.8 | | 0.0 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 11.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 56.3 | | | | 67.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 67.6 | | Other stock issuances | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.7 | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 1.6 | | December 31, 2014 | | 292.8 | | | | (26.2 | ) | | $ | 292.8 | | | $ | 218.4 | | | $ | 2,414.9 | | | $ | (34.7 | ) | | $ | (789.5 | ) | | $ | 2,101.9 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 2,101.9 | | Net income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 410.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 410.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 410.4 | | Other comprehensive (loss) income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (11.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (11.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (11.2 | ) | Cash dividends | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (175.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (175.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (175.3 | ) | Stock purchases | | 0.0 | | | | (8.8 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (363.1 | ) | | | (363.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (363.1 | ) | Transfer of stock for settlement of share repurchase agreement | | 0.0 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (4.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $15.8 | | 0.0 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 15.7 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 44.8 | | | | 60.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 60.5 | | December 31, 2015 | | 292.8 | | | | (32.8 | ) | | $ | 292.8 | | | $ | 230.0 | | | $ | 2,650.0 | | | $ | (45.9 | ) | | $ | (1,103.7 | ) | | $ | 2,023.2 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 2,023.2 | | Net income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 459.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 459.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 459.0 | | Other comprehensive (loss) income | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (17.9 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (17.9 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (17.9 | ) | Cash dividends | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (183.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (183.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (183.0 | ) | Stock purchases | | 0.0 | | | | (9.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (400.0 | ) | | | (400.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (400.0 | ) | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $30.0 | | 0.0 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 21.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 75.2 | | | | 96.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 96.6 | | December 31, 2016 | | 292.8 | | | | (38.9 | ) | | $ | 292.8 | | | $ | 251.4 | | | $ | 2,926.0 | | | $ | (63.8 | ) | | $ | (1,428.5 | ) | | $ | 1,977.9 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 1,977.9 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 58
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest (net of amounts capitalized) | | $ | 26.4 | | | $ | 9.7 | | | $ | 9.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Income taxes | | $ | 219.2 | | | $ | 123.8 | | | $ | 108.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in Accounts Payable | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | $ | 6.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Property, plant and equipment expenditures included in other long-term liabilities (related to leasing obligations for new corporate headquarters facility) | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 32.5 | | | $ | 17.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Acquisitions in which liabilities were assumed are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of assets | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 825.7 | | | $ | 69.1 | | Purchase price | | | 0.0 | | | | (652.3 | ) | | | (69.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities assumed | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 173.4 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of Shares | | | Amounts | | | | | Common
Stock | | | Treasury
Stock | | | Common
Stock | | | Additional
Paid-In
Capital | | | Retained
Earnings | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | | Treasury
Stock | | | Total Church
& Dwight
Co., Inc.
Stockholders’
Equity | | | Noncontrolling
Interest | | | Total
Stockholders’
Equity | | December 31, 2010 | | | 146.4 | | | | (4.0 | ) | | $ | 146.4 | | | $ | 230.8 | | | $ | 1,501.8 | | | $ | 16.3 | | | $ | (24.6 | ) | | $ | 1,870.7 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 1,870.9 | | Net income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 309.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 309.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 309.6 | | Other comprehensive income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (13.4 | ) | Cash dividends | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (97.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (97.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (97.4 | ) | Stock purchases | | | 0.0 | | | | (1.8 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (80.2 | ) | | | (80.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (80.2 | ) | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $13.3 | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 40.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 9.9 | | | | 50.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 50.2 | | Other stock issuances | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2011 | | | 146.4 | | | | (4.1 | ) | | $ | 146.4 | | | $ | 271.7 | | | $ | 1,714.0 | | | $ | 2.9 | | | $ | (94.4 | ) | | $ | 2,040.6 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 2,040.8 | | Net income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 349.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 349.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 349.8 | | Other comprehensive income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.4 | ) | Cash dividends | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (134.5 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (134.5 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (134.5 | ) | Stock purchases | | | 0.0 | | | | (5.0 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (250.4 | ) | | | (250.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (250.4 | ) | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $15.4 | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 45.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 8.5 | | | | 54.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 54.4 | | Other stock issuances | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 1.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | | 146.4 | | | | (7.6 | ) | | $ | 146.4 | | | $ | 318.8 | | | $ | 1,929.3 | | | $ | 2.5 | | | $ | (336.1 | ) | | $ | 2,060.9 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 2,061.1 | | Net income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 394.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 394.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 394.4 | | Other comprehensive income | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (2.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (2.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (2.3 | ) | Cash dividends | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (155.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (155.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (155.2 | ) | Stock purchases | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.9 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (50.1 | ) | | | (50.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (50.1 | ) | Stock based compensation expense and stock option plan transactions, including related income tax benefits of $13.4 | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 34.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 18.1 | | | | 52.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 52.2 | | Other | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2013 | | | 146.4 | | | | (7.5 | ) | | $ | 146.4 | | | $ | 352.9 | | | $ | 2,168.5 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | (368.1 | ) | | $ | 2,299.9 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 2,300.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. | Significant Accounting Policies |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Business The Company, founded in 1846, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of household, personal care and specialty products. The Company sells its consumer products under a variety of brands through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, dollar, pet and other specialty stores and websites, all of which sell the products to consumers. The Company also sells specialty products to industrial customers and distributors. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and include the accounts of the Company and itsmajority-owned majority‑owned subsidiaries. For equity investments in which the Company does not control or have the ability to exert significant influence over the investee, which generally is when the Company has less than a 20% ownership interest, the investments are accounted for under the cost method. In circumstances where the Company has greater than a 20% ownership interest and has the ability to exercise significant influence over, but does not control, the investee, the investment is accounted for under the equity method. As a result, the Company accounts for its 50% interest in its Armand Products Company (“Armand”) joint venture and its 50% interest in The ArmaKleen Company (“ArmaKleen”) joint venture and itsunder the equity method. The Company’s one-third interest in its Natronx Technologies, LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture was accounted for under the equity method.method until the remaining investment in it was fully impaired in 2015. Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx are specialty chemical businesses, and thebusinesses. The Company’s equity in earnings (losses) in themof Armand and ArmaKleen for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are reportedincluded in the Company’s corporateCorporate segment, as described in Note 18. None of these entities are considered a significant subsidiary; therefore, summarized financial statement data is not presented.16. On June 1, 2011,August 4, 2016, the Company effectedannounced a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock (“Common StockStock”). The stock split was structured in the form of a 100% stock dividend.dividend, payable on September 1, 2016 to stockholders of record as of August 15, 2016. All applicable amounts in the consolidated financial statements including earnings per share and related disclosures have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split. Fiscal Calendar
Beginning January 1, 2012, the Company changed its 4 week—4 week—5 week quarterly reporting calendar to a month-end quarterly calendar. This change eliminated differences in the number of days in the first and fourth quarters of the year, when the Company provided year-over-prior year comparisons beginning in 2013. These differences did not have a material effect on the comparative results of the quarterly periods in 2012 and 2011.
In addition, as a result of the Company’s transition to a new information system in North America during 2011 and 2012, in the fourth quarter 2011 the Company eliminated a one month reporting lag for its U.K, France and Australia subsidiaries to be consistent with the fiscal calendar of the Company and its other subsidiaries. Due to the elimination of the reporting lag, 13 fiscal months of financial results are included in 2011 for the affected subsidiaries. The implementation of the new information system enables the Company to timely consolidate these results. The elimination of the reporting lag is considered a change in accounting principle. The Company considered this change to be preferable because it provides more current information to the users of its financial statements and eliminates the need to track and reconcile material intervening transactions. The Company has determined that the impact of the extra month is not material to its financial statements and, therefore, has not retrospectively adjusted prior year amounts. The elimination of the reporting lag also resulted in the inclusion of the extra month within the fourth quarter of 2011 for the affected subsidiaries, which increased 2011 fourth quarter annual net sales by $14.3, and had a negligible impact on net income.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent gains and losses at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management makes estimates regarding inventory valuation, promotional and sales returns reserves, the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets, the realization of deferred tax assets, tax reserves, liabilities related to pensions and other postretirement benefit obligations and other matters that affect the reported amounts and other disclosures in the financial statements. These estimates are based on judgment and available information. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates, and it is possible that changes in such estimates could occur in the near term. RRevenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when finished goods are delivered to the Company’s customers or when finished goods are picked up by a customer or a customer’s carrier. Promotional and Sales Returns Reserves The Company conducts extensive promotional activities, primarily through the use of off-list discounts, slotting, coupons, cooperative advertising, periodic price reduction arrangements, and end-aisle and other in-store displays. The costs of such activities are netted against sales. Slotting costs are recorded when the product is delivered to the customer. Costs associated with coupon redemption are recorded when coupons are circulated. Cooperative advertising costs are recorded when the customer places the advertisement for the Company’s products. Discounts relating to price reduction arrangements are recorded when the related sale takes place. Costs associated with end-aisle or other in-store displays are recorded when the revenue from the product that is subject to the promotion is recognized. The reserves for sales returns and consumer and trade promotion liabilities are established based on the Company’s best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing obligations for products sold as of the balance sheet date. The Company uses historical trend experience and coupon redemption provider input in arriving at coupon reserve 59
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) requirements, and uses forecasted appropriations, customer and sales organization inputs, and historical trend analysis in determining the reserves for other promotional activities and sales returns. Sales of Accounts Receivable The Company entered into a factoring agreement with a financial institution to sell certain customer receivables at discounted rates in 2015. Transactions under this agreement are accounted for as sales of accounts receivable and were removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheet at the time of the sales transaction. The Company factored an additional $22.3 in 2016, resulting in a total of $60.1 and $37.8 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cost of Sales, Marketing and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Cost of sales include costs related to the manufacture of the Company’s products, including raw material, inbound freight, direct labor (including employee compensation benefits) and indirect plant costs such as plant supervision, receiving, inspection, maintenance labor and materials, depreciation, taxes and insurance, purchasing, production planning, operations management, logistics, freight to customers, warehousing costs, internal transfer freight costs and plant impairment charges. Marketing expenses include costs for advertising (excluding the costs of cooperative advertising programs, which are reflected in net sales), costs for coupon insertion (mainly the cost of printing and distribution), consumer promotion costs (such as on-shelf advertisements and floor ads), public relations, package design expense and market research costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) expenses include, among others, costs related to functions such as sales, corporate management, research and development, marketing administration, information CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
technology and legal. Such costs include salary compensation related costs (such as benefits, incentive compensation and profit sharing), stock option costs, depreciation, travel and entertainment related expenses, professional and other consulting fees and amortization of intangible assets. Foreign Currency Translation Unrealized gains and losses related to currency translation are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid short-term investments and term bank deposits, which mature within three months of their original maturity date. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Approximately 17%20% and 20%19% of the inventory at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, including substantially all inventory in the Company’s Specialty Products Division (“SPD”) segment as well as domestic inventory sold primarily under the ARM & HAMMER trademark in the Consumer Domestic segment, was determined utilizing the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. The cost of the remaining inventory was determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The Company identifies any slow moving, obsolete or excess inventory to determine whether an adjustment is required to establish a new carrying value. The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates and assumptions about the future demand for the Company’s products, technological changes, and new product introductions. Estimates as to the future demand used in the valuation of inventory involve judgments regarding the ongoing success of the Company’s products. The Company evaluates its inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis and records adjustments as required. Adjustments to reflect inventory at net realizable value were $10.1$10.5 at December 31, 2013,2016, and $5.7$12.6 at December 31, 2012.2015. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, Plant and Equipment (“PP&E”) are stated at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful lives for building and improvements, machinery and equipment, and office equipment range from 9-40, 3-20 and 3-10 years, respectively. Routine repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred. 60
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) Leasehold improvements are depreciated over a period no longer than the respective lease term, except where a lease renewal has been determined to be reasonably assured and failure to renew the lease results in an economica significant penalty to the Company. PP&E are reviewed annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that possible impairment exists. The Company’s impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level at which cash flows of the long-lived assets are largely independent of other groups of Company assets and liabilities. The analysis requires management judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines, and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates. The Company conducts annual reviews to identify idle and underutilized equipment, and reviews business plans for possible impairment. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
When an impairment is indicated, the estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows. Software The Company capitalizes certain costs of developing computer software. Amortization is recorded using thestraight-line straight‑line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is estimated to be no longer than 10 years. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Certain financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value. The estimated fair values of such financial instruments (including investment securities and other derivatives) have been determined using market information and valuation methodologies. Changes in assumptions or estimation methods could affect the fair value estimates. Other financial instruments, including cash equivalents and short-term debt, are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Additional information regarding the Company’s risk management activities, including derivative instruments and hedging activities, are separately disclosed. See Notes 2 and 3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets GoodwillCarrying values of goodwill, trade names and other indefinite lived intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are reviewed periodically for possible impairment. The Company’s impairment at least annually usinganalysis is based on a discounted cash flow model.approach that requires significant judgment with respect to unit volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. Management uses estimates based on expected trends in making these assumptions. With respect to goodwill, impairment occurs when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the discounted present value of cash flows for that reporting unit. For trade names and other intangible assets, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of estimated future cash flows, which represents the estimated fair value of the asset. Judgment is required in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual valuations. Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological change, distribution losses, or competitive activities and acts by governments and courts may indicate that an asset has become impaired. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3-20 years, using the straight-line method, and reviewed for impairment when changes in market circumstances occur.
It is possible that the Company’s conclusions regarding impairment or recoverability of goodwill or other intangible assets could change in future periods if, for example, (i) the businesses or brands do not perform as projected, (ii) overall economic conditions in 2017 or future years vary from current assumptions (including changes in discount rates), (iii) business conditions or strategies change from current assumptions, (iv) investors require higher rates of return on equity investments in the marketplace or (v) enterprise values of comparable publicly traded companies, or actual sales transactions of comparable companies, were to decline, resulting in lower multiples of revenues and EBITDA. Research and Development The Company incurred research and development expenses in the amount of $61.8, $54.8$63.2, $64.7 and $55.1$59.8 in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. These expenses are included in SG&A expenses.expenses and are expensed as incurred. 61
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) Basic EPS is calculated based on income available to holders of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted EPS includes additional dilution from potential Common Stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | | | 138.6 | | | | 140.1 | | | | 143.2 | | Dilutive effect of stock options | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted | | | 141.2 | | | | 142.7 | | | | 145.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Antidilutive stock options outstanding | | | 1.6 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic | | 257.6 | | | | 262.2 | | | | 270.2 | | Dilutive effect of stock options | | 4.5 | | | | 5.0 | | | | 4.8 | | Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted | | 262.1 | | | | 267.2 | | | | 275.0 | | Antidilutive stock options outstanding | | 1.4 | | | | 2.2 | | | | 2.4 | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Employee and Director Stock Option Based Compensation The fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and the related expense is recognized over the required employee service period in which the share-based compensation vests. In 2013,The following table presents the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $17.0 associated with the fair-valuefair value of unvested stock options and restricted stock awards of which $15.5 was included in SG&A expenses and $1.5 was included in cost of goods sold.sales:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Cost of sales | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 1.6 | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 14.1 | | | | 14.5 | | | | 15.4 | | Total | $ | 16.0 | | | $ | 16.1 | | | $ | 17.0 | |
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Management provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for amounts which are not considered “more likely than not” to be realized. The Company records liabilities for potential assessments in various tax jurisdictions under Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes.in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). The liabilities relate to tax return positions that, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by the tax authorities and do not meet the minimum recognition threshold required under applicable accounting guidance for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement. The Company adjusts this liability as a result of changes in tax legislation, interpretations of laws by courts, rulings by tax authorities, changes in estimates and the expiration of the statute of limitations. Many of the judgments involved in adjusting the liability involve assumptions and estimates that are highly uncertain and subject to change. In this regard, settlement of any issue with, or an adverse determination in litigation against, a taxing authority could require the use of cash and result in an increase in the Company’s annual tax rate. Conversely, favorable resolution of an issue with a taxing authority would be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s annual tax rate. 62
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) New Accounting Pronouncements AdoptedIssued During the first quarter of 2013,In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance for the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance requires an entityseeking to present information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income either on the face ofeliminate diversity in practice related to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.of cash flows. The Company elected to present the requirements in the notes to the financial statements (see Note 15). The adoption of the new pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations oramendments address eight specific cash flows.
In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance requiring an entity to net its liabilityflow issues and are effective for unrecognized tax benefits against the deferred tax assets for all same jurisdiction net operating losses or similar tax loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards. A gross presentation will be required only if such carryforwards are not available as of reporting date to settle any additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position or the entity does not intend to use these carryforwards for this purpose. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis forfiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those years.2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance will be applied on a retrospective basis beginning with the earliest period presented. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March, April, and May of 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. The amendments clarify the guidance for identifying performance obligations, licensing arrangements and principal versus agent considerations. The amendments additionally provide clarification on how to assess collectability, present sales tax, treat noncash consideration, and account for completed and modified contracts at the time of transition. The guidance is effective for annual periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and allows companies to apply the requirements retrospectively, either to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment in the year of adoption. The new standard will be effective for the Company at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The guidance is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESIn March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that makes modifications to how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory withholding requirements, as well as the classification of excess tax benefits in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and will elect to adopt the cash flow presentation of the excess tax benefits prospectively. The Company has also elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period. The adoption is expected to impact the Company's income tax provision on its Consolidated Statements of Income and its operating and financing cash flows on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The impact of adopting this standard on the consolidated financial statements will be dependent on the timing and intrinsic value of future share-based compensation award exercises.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except shareIn February 2016, the FASB issued new lease accounting guidance, requiring lessees to recognize right-of-use lease assets and per share data)
lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases previously classified as operating leases, with a term greater than a year. The new guidance also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of the guidance will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. There have been no other accounting pronouncements issued but not yet adopted by the Company which are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 2. Fair Value Measurements
2. | Fair Value Measurements |
Fair Value Hierarchy Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value (generally, assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability) based on the quality and reliability of the information provided by the inputs, as follows: Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. 63
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) Fair Values of Other Financial Instruments The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s assetsother financial instruments at December 31, 2016 and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were derivative instruments and are further described in Note 3.December 31, 2015: | | | December 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | | | Input | | Carrying | | | Fair | | | Carrying | | | Fair | | | Level | | Amount | | | Value | | | Amount | | | Value | | Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash equivalents | Level 1 | | $ | 72.4 | | | $ | 72.4 | | | $ | 89.3 | | | $ | 89.3 | | Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Short-term borrowings | Level 2 | | | 426.8 | | | | 426.8 | | | | 357.2 | | | | 357.2 | | 2.875% Senior notes | Level 2 | | | 399.8 | | | | 396.9 | | | | 399.7 | | | | 390.5 | | 2.45% Senior notes | Level 2 | | | 299.9 | | | | 302.0 | | | | 299.9 | | | | 296.0 | | Fair value adjustment asset (liability) related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument | Level 2 | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 1.3 | | | | 1.3 | |
The Company recognizes transfers between input levels as of the actual date of the event. There were no transfers between input levels during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. Fair Values of Other Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.2016.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | Input
Level | | | Carrying
Amount | | | Fair
Value | | | Carrying
Amount | | | Fair
Value | | Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash equivalents | | | Level 2 | | | $ | 318.5 | | | $ | 318.5 | | | $ | 223.2 | | | $ | 223.2 | | Note receivable | | | Level 2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Short-term borrowings | | | Level 2 | | | | 153.8 | | | | 153.8 | | | | 253.8 | | | | 253.8 | | 2.875% Senior notes | | | Level 2 | | | | 399.7 | | | | 369.8 | | | | 399.6 | | | | 392.6 | | 3.35% Senior notes | | | Level 2 | | | | 249.8 | | | | 258.2 | | | | 249.8 | | | | 264.1 | |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: Cash Equivalents:Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid short-term investments and term bank deposits, which mature within three months of their original maturity date.months. The estimated fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximates their carrying value. Short-Term Borrowings: Note Receivable:The fair value of the note receivable reflects what management believes is the appropriate interest factor at December 31, 2012 based on similar risks in the market. Short-Term Borrowings:The carrying amounts of the Company’s unsecured lines of credit and commercial paper issuances approximates fair value because of their short maturities and variable interest rates.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Senior Notes:The Company determines the fair value of its senior notes based on their quoted market value or broker quotes, when possible. In the absence of observable market quotes, the notes are valued usingnon-binding market consensus prices that the Company seeks to corroborate with observable market data. Hedged Fixed Rated Debt:3. Derivative Instruments The interest rate swap agreements convert the fixed interest rate to a variable rate based on LIBOR. These agreements are designated as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and Risk Managementare accounted for as fair value hedges. The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet within Other Assets or Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation. Other: The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximated estimated fair values as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. 3. | Derivative Instruments and Risk Management |
Changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the price of the Common Stock and commodity prices expose the Company to market risk. The Company manages these risks by the use of derivative instruments, such as cash flow and fair value hedges, diesel hedge contracts, equity derivatives and foreign exchange forward contracts. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The Company formally designates and documents qualifying instruments as hedges of underlying exposures when it enters into derivative arrangements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges and qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings during the period in which the hedged exposure affects earnings. The Company reviews the effectiveness of its hedging instruments on a quarterly basis. If the Company determines that a derivative instrument is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows, it recognizes the hedge ineffectiveness in current period earnings and discontinues hedge accounting with respect to the derivative instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges or those not qualifying for hedge accounting are recognized in current period earnings. Upon termination of cash flow hedges, the Company reclassifies gains and losses from other comprehensive income based 64
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) on the timing of the underlying cash flows, unless the termination results from the failure of the intended transaction to occur in the expected timeframe. Such untimely transactions require immediate recognition in earnings of gains and losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income. During 20132016 and 2012,2015, the Company used derivative instruments to mitigate risk, some of which were designated as hedging instruments. The tables following the discussion of the derivative instruments below summarize the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and the effect of derivative instruments on the Company’s consolidated statements of income and on other comprehensive income. Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Diesel Fuel Hedges The Company uses independent freight carriers to deliver its products. These carriers currently charge the Company a basic rate per mile that is subject to a mileage surcharge for diesel fuel price increases. During 20122016 and 2013,2015, the Company entered into hedge agreements with financial counterparties to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices, and related fuel surcharges, and not to speculate in the future price of diesel fuel. Under the hedge agreements, the Company agreed to pay a fixed price per gallon of diesel fuel determined at the time the agreements were executed and to receive a floating rate payment reflecting the variable common carriers’ mileage surcharge. The floating rate paymentthat is determined on a monthly basis based on the average price of the Department of Energy’s Diesel Fuel Index price during the applicable month and is designed to offset any increase or decrease in fuel surcharge paymentscosts that the Company pays to itsit common carriers. The agreements covered approximately 45%32% of the Company’s 2016 diesel fuel requirements for 2013 and are expected to cover approximately 34%32% of the Company’s estimated diesel fuel requirements for 2014.2017. These diesel fuel hedge agreements qualify for hedge accounting, and therefore,accounting. Therefore, changes in the fair value of diesel fuel hedgesuch agreements are recorded inunder Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheet and in the Company’s consolidated statement of other comprehensive income. sheet.CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Foreign Currency The Company is subject to exposure from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily U.S. Dollar/Euro, U.S. Dollar/British Pound, U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Mexican Peso, U.S. Dollar/Australian Dollar, U.S. Dollar/Brazilian Real and U.S. Dollar/Chinese Yuan. The Company from time to time, enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to anticipated but not yet committed intercompany sales or purchases denominated in U.S. Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound and Euro. The Company has entered into forward exchange contracts to protecthedge itself from the risk that, due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, it would be adversely affected by net cash outflows. The face value of the unexpired contracts as of December 31, 20132016 totaled $25.6$95.9 in U.S. Dollars. The contractsDollars, of which $94.1 qualify as foreign currency cash flow hedges and, therefore, changes in the fair value of the contracts are recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affected earnings. Interest Rate Swaps On December 9, 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on the $300.0 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% senior notes, due December 15, 2019, to a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus a fixed spread of 0.756%. These interest rate swap agreements have been designated as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and are accounted as fair value hedges. The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet within Other Assets or Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation. Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments Equity Derivatives The Company has entered into equity derivative contracts covering the Common Stock in order to minimize its liability under its Executive Deferred Compensation Plan resulting from changes in the quoted fair values of the Common Stock to participants who have investments under the Plan in a notional Common Stock fund. The contracts are settled in cash. Since the equity derivatives contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, the Company is required to mark such contracts to market throughout the contract term and record changes in fair value in the consolidated statement of income. The following tables summarize the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments and the effect of derivative instruments on its Consolidated Statements of Income and on other comprehensive income (“OCI”):65
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Notional
Amount | | | Fair Value at
December 31, | | | | Balance Sheet Location | | December 31,
2013 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Derivatives designated as hedging instrument | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asset Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Diesel fuel contracts | | Other current assets | | $ | 3.9 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.2 | | Foreign exchange contracts | | Other current assets | | $ | 25.6 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total assets | | | | | | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivatives not designated as hedging instrument | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asset Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity derivatives | | Other current assets | | $ | 23.3 | | | $ | 2.4 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total assets | | | | | | | | $ | 2.4 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI from
Derivatives
for the Year ended December 31, | | | | | Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Location | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Diesel fuel contracts (net of taxes) | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | (0.3 | ) | Foreign exchange contracts (net of taxes) | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total gain (loss) recognized in OCI | | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income for the
Year ended December 31, | | | | | Income Statement Location | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity derivatives | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | $ | 5.3 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | $ | 3.9 | | Foreign exchange contracts | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total gain (loss) recognized in income | | | | $ | 5.2 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 3.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The notional amount of a financialderivative instrument is the nominal or face amount used to calculate payments made on that instrument. Notional amounts are presented in the following table: | | Notional | | Notional | | | | Amount | | Amount | | | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 94.1 | | $ | 118.0 | | Interest rate swap | | $ | 300.0 | | $ | 300.0 | | Diesel fuel contracts | | 2.0 gallons | | 2.0 gallons | | Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 1.8 | | $ | 33.2 | | Equity derivatives | | $ | 34.4 | | $ | 32.4 | |
The fair values and amount of gain (loss) recognized in income and other comprehensive income associated with the derivative instruments disclosed above were measured based on Level 2 inputs. The fair value of the diesel fuel contracts is based on home heating oil futures prices for the duration of the contract.
The fair value of the foreign exchange contracts is based on observable forward rates in commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the contract.
The fair value of the equity derivatives is baseddo not have a material impact on the quoted market prices of the Common Stock at the end of each reporting period.Company’s consolidated financial statements.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following: | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | | Raw materials and supplies | | $ | 70.2 | | | $ | 71.7 | | Work in process | | | 30.4 | | | | 22.4 | | Finished goods | | | 149.9 | | | | 148.1 | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 250.5 | | | $ | 242.2 | | | | | | | | | | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| December 31, | | | December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Raw materials and supplies | $ | 69.8 | | | $ | 84.6 | | Work in process | | 28.8 | | | | 33.1 | | Finished goods | | 159.6 | | | | 156.3 | | Total | $ | 258.2 | | | $ | 274.0 | |
Inventories valued using the LIFO method totaled $42.3$51.8 and $49.0$53.2 at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, and would have been approximately $4.8$4.2 and $5.6$3.8 higher, respectively, had they been valued using the FIFO method. The amount of LIFO liquidations in 20132016 and 20122015 were immaterial. 5. Property, Plant and Equipment
5. | Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (“PP&E”) |
PP&E consist of the following: | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Land | $ | 25.1 | | | $ | 25.2 | | Buildings and improvements | | 284.7 | | | | 277.3 | | Machinery and equipment | | 680.1 | | | | 665.2 | | Software | | 90.4 | | | | 84.9 | | Office equipment and other assets | | 60.8 | | | | 59.2 | | Construction in progress | | 24.2 | | | | 33.2 | | Gross PP&E | | 1,165.3 | | | | 1,145.0 | | Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | 576.7 | | | | 535.4 | | Net PP&E | $ | 588.6 | | | $ | 609.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | | Land | | $ | 25.7 | | | $ | 26.0 | | Buildings and improvements | | | 280.4 | | | | 276.8 | | Machinery and equipment | | | 577.5 | | | | 562.7 | | Software | | | 83.0 | | | | 80.6 | | Office equipment and other assets | | | 57.7 | | | | 55.1 | | Construction in progress | | | 42.9 | | | | 21.0 | | | | | | | | | | | Gross Property, Plant and Equipment | | | 1,067.2 | | | | 1,022.2 | | Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | 473.1 | | | | 436.2 | | | | | | | | | | | Net Property, Plant and Equipment | | $ | 594.1 | | | $ | 586.0 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For the Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Depreciation and amortization on PP&E | | $ | 59.7 | | | $ | 56.0 | | | $ | 49.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest charges capitalized (in construction in progress) | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 1.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company recognized charges related to equipment obsolescence, which occur in the ordinary course of business, and plant impairment charges during the three year period ended December 31, 2013 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For the Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Segments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer Domestic | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 1.9 | | Consumer International | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.2 | | Specialty Products | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 1.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Depreciation and amortization on PP&E | $ | 59.7 | | | $ | 58.3 | | | $ | 57.1 | |
The 2013 and 2012 Consumer Domestic and SPD charges are due to the idling of equipment and the 2012 Consumer International charge is due to the cancelation of a software project. The Consumer Domestic charge recorded in 2011 is a result of the idling of equipment. The SPD charge recorded in 2011 is associated with the Company’s decision to explore strategic options for the chemical business in Brazil.
6. Acquisitions
On October 1, 2012, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Avid Health, Inc. (“Avid Health”) for $652.8. The Company financed the acquisition with a combination of proceeds from an
66
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) underwritten public offering of $400 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2022,
On December 22, 2016, the issuance of commercial paperCompany acquired the ANUSOL and cash. Products acquiredRECTINOL (the “Anusol Acquisition”) business from Johnson & Johnson, Inc. for $130. These are the leading hemorrhoid care brands in each market in which they operate, primarily in the U.K., Canada, Australia and South Africa with total annual sales of $24 in 2016. The acquisition include L’IL CRITTERS children’s gummy form dietary supplementswas funded with additional short-term borrowings and VITAFUSION adult gummy form dietary supplements.will be managed in the Consumer International segment. The preliminary fair values of the net assets acquired are set forth as follows: | 2016 | | | Anusol | | Inventory and other working capital | $ | 0.5 | | Trade names and other intangibles | | 91.7 | | Goodwill | | 37.8 | | Cash purchase price | $ | 130.0 | |
The life of the amortizable intangible assets recognized from the Anusol Acquisition ranges from 15 - 20 years. The goodwill is a result of expected synergies from combined operations of the acquisition and the Company. Pro forma results are not presented because the impact is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results. On January 4, 2016, the Company acquired Spencer Forrest, Inc., the maker of TOPPIK, (the “Toppik Acquisition”), the leading brand of hair building fibers for people with thinning hair. The total purchase price was $175.3. The Company financed the acquisition with short-term borrowings. This brand is managed within the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. The fair values of the net assets acquired are set forth as follows: | 2016 | | | Toppik | | Inventory and other working capital | $ | 9.3 | | Property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets | | 0.2 | | Trade names and other intangibles | | 115.8 | | Goodwill | | 52.3 | | Current liabilities | | (2.3 | ) | Cash purchase price (net of cash acquired) | $ | 175.3 | |
The life of the amortizable intangible assets recognized from the Toppik Acquisition ranges from 10 - 20 years. The goodwill is a result of expected synergies from combined operations of the acquisition and the Company. Pro forma results are not presented because the impact is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results. On January 2, 2015, the Company acquired VI-COR, a manufacturer and seller of feed ingredients for cows, beef cattle, poultry and other livestock for cash consideration of $74.9, and a $5.0 payment to be made after one year if a certain operating performance is achieved. The Company financed the acquisition with available cash. Based on 2015 operating results, the Company made a $4.6 payment in 2016. These dietary supplement brands are managed principallywithin the SPD segment. The fair values of the net assets acquired are set forth as follows: | 2015 | | | VI-COR | | Inventory and other working capital | $ | 1.1 | | Property, plant and equipment | | 6.4 | | Trade names and other intangibles | | 42.1 | | Goodwill | | 29.9 | | Purchase Price | $ | 79.5 | | Fair value of contingent payment due in one year | | (4.6 | ) | Cash purchase price | $ | 74.9 | |
67
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) The life of the amortizable intangible assets recognized from the VI-COR Acquisition ranges from 5 - 15 years. The goodwill is a result of expected synergies from combined operations of the acquired assets and the Company. Pro forma results are not presented because the impact is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results. On September 19, 2014, the Company acquired certain feminine care brands, including REPHRESH and REPLENS, from Lil’ Drug Store Products, Inc., (“Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition”) for cash consideration of $215.7. The Company paid for the acquisition with additional debt. These feminine care brands are managed within the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. On November 8, 2011, the Company acquired a license for certain oral care technology for cash consideration of $4.3. The Company paid for the acquisition from available cash. The technology is managed principally within the Consumer Domestic segment.
On June 28, 2011, the Company acquired the BATISTE dry shampoo brand (“BATISTE”) from Vivalis Limited for cash consideration of $64.8. The Company paid for the acquisition from available cash. BATISTE annual sales were approximately $20.0 before the acquisition. The BATISTE brand is managed within the Consumer International segment.
The final fair values of the net assets acquired in 2012 for Avid Health, including the 2013 adjustments to fair value, and the fair values of the assets acquired in 2011 are below. The 2013 measurement period adjustments were not retrospectively adjustedset forth as of December 31, 2012 as the amounts were not material.follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2012 | | Avid Health | | Acquisition Date
Preliminary
Fair Value | | | Measurement
Period
Adjustments | | | Acquisition
Date Final
Fair Value | | Inventory | | $ | 38.5 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 38.8 | | Accounts receivables, net | | | 29.6 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | 29.3 | | Other current assets | | | 1.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.9 | | Property, plant and equipment | | | 33.4 | | | | (1.8 | ) | | | 31.6 | | Long-term assets | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.4 | | | | 1.4 | | Tradenames and other intangibles | | | 376.9 | | | | (14.7 | ) | | | 362.2 | | Goodwill | | | 345.4 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 353.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Assets | | $ | 825.7 | | | $ | (6.7 | ) | | $ | 819.0 | | Other current liabilities | | | (19.3 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (19.5 | ) | Deferred income taxes | | | (154.1 | ) | | | 7.4 | | | | (146.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Purchase Price | | $ | 652.3 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 652.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2011 | | | | | Batiste | | | Oral Care
Technology
License | | | Total | | Inventory | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 1.0 | | Tradenames and other intangibles | | | 53.1 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 57.4 | | Goodwill | | | 10.7 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 10.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Assets | | | 64.8 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 69.1 | | Liabilities | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Purchase Price | | $ | 64.8 | | | $ | 4.3 | | | $ | 69.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | | Lil' Drug Store | | Inventory and other working capital | $ | 3.2 | | Property, plant and equipment | | 0.7 | | Trade names and other intangibles | | 109.0 | | Goodwill | | 102.8 | | Purchase Price | $ | 215.7 | |
The weighted-average life of the amortizable intangible assets recognized from the Avid Health and BATISTE acquisitions was 15 years,Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition ranges from 5 - 20 years. The goodwill is a result of expected synergies from combined operations of the acquisition and the weighted-average life of the technology intangible asset recognized CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
from the 2011 oral care technology acquisitions was 7 years. Unaudited pro forma results for 2012 and 2011 reflecting the Avid Health acquisition are presented below.Company. Pro forma results reflecting acquisitions in 2011 are not presented because theythe impact is not material to the Company’s consolidated financial results.
The goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the Anusol Acquisition, the Toppik Acquisition, the VI-COR Acquisition, and Lil’ Drug Store Brands Acquisition are not material.deductible for U.S. tax purposes. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Twelve Months Ended | | | Twelve Months Ended | | Unaudited consolidated pro forma results | | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | | | | | Reported | | | Pro forma | | | Reported | | | Pro forma | | Net Sales | | $ | 2,921.9 | | | $ | 3,106.0 | | | $ | 2,749.3 | | | $ | 2,947.8 | | Net Income | | $ | 349.8 | | | $ | 374.9 | | | $ | 309.6 | | | $ | 318.2 | | Net Income per share—Basic | | $ | 2.50 | | | $ | 2.68 | | | $ | 2.16 | | | $ | 2.22 | | Net Income per share—Diluted | | $ | 2.45 | | | $ | 2.63 | | | $ | 2.12 | | | $ | 2.18 | |
These pro forma results give effect to the Avid Health acquisition as if it occurred on January 1, 2011. 2012 pro forma net income was adjusted to exclude the pre-tax equivalent of $4.4 of acquisition-related costs and $7.6 of nonrecurring expense related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition-date inventory. 2011 pro forma net income was adjusted to include these charges.
7. Goodwill and Other Intangibles | Goodwill and Other Intangibles, Net |
The following table provides information related to the carrying value of all intangible assets, other than goodwill: | | December 31, 2016 | | | | | December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | | | | | | Amortization | | Gross | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2013 | | | | December 31, 2012 | | Carrying | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | Period | | Carrying | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | Gross
Carrying
Amount | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net | | Amortization
Period
(Years) | | Gross
Carrying
Amount | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Net | | | (Years) | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Net | | Amortizable intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Trade names | | $ | 166.8 | | | $ | (73.9 | ) | | $ | 92.9 | | | | 3-20 | | | $ | 131.1 | | | $ | (67.1 | ) | | $ | 64.0 | | $ | 442.6 | | | $ | (115.0 | ) | | $ | 327.6 | | | 3-20 | | $ | 259.5 | | | $ | (96.4 | ) | | $ | 163.1 | | Customer Relationships | | | 333.0 | | | | (100.4 | ) | | | 232.6 | | | | 15-20 | | | | 333.8 | | | | (81.1 | ) | | | 252.7 | | | 384.4 | | | | (164.2 | ) | | | 220.2 | | | 15-20 | | | 372.4 | | | | (141.8 | ) | | | 230.6 | | Patents/Formulas | | | 43.5 | | | | (31.4 | ) | | | 12.1 | | | | 4-20 | | | | 43.0 | | | | (28.7 | ) | | | 14.3 | | | 68.7 | | | | (45.4 | ) | | | 23.3 | | | 4-20 | | | 57.4 | | | | (41.9 | ) | | | 15.5 | | Non Compete Agreement | | | 1.4 | | | | (1.3 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | 5-10 | | | | 1.4 | | | | (1.3 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | 1.8 | | | | (1.6 | ) | | | 0.2 | | | 5-10 | | | 1.8 | | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 0.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 544.7 | | | $ | (207.0 | ) | | $ | 337.7 | | | | | $ | 509.3 | | | $ | (178.2 | ) | | $ | 331.1 | | $ | 897.5 | | | $ | (326.2 | ) | | $ | 571.3 | | | | | $ | 691.1 | | | $ | (281.6 | ) | | $ | 409.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Indefinite lived intangible assets—Carrying value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31,
2013 | | | | | | | | December 31,
2012 | | | | | | | Trade names | | $ | 866.6 | | | | | | | | | $ | 923.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company recognized trade name impairment charges within SG&A expenses during the three year period ended December 31, 2013 as follows:
Indefinite lived intangible assets - Carrying value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Segments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer Domestic | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Consumer International | | | 4.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 6.5 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | | | | | | | | December 31, | | | | | | | 2016 | | | | | | | | | 2015 | | | | | | Trade names | $ | 860.5 | | | | | | | | | $ | 860.0 | | | | | |
The increase in indefinite lived intangible assets is due to changes in foreign exchange rates. In 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 for an intangible asset related to the Consumer Domestic segment. This charge is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in this segment and was the result of reduced sales and profitability related to the product line. The amount of the charge was determined from estimating that future cash flows would not be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the asset. 68
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) The trade name impairment charges recorded in 2013 were a result of lower forecasted sales and profitability and increased competition. The amount of the impairment charge was determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. Fair value was estimated based on a “relief from royalty” or “excess earnings” discounted cash flow method, which contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change, and therefore could impact fair values in the future. Consequently, the Company determined that a Consumer Domestic and a Consumer International trade name should be re-characterized from indefinite lived to finite lived assets. The carrying value of these trade names is approximately $35.7 and will be amortized over 15 years. The Company determined that the remaining carrying value of all trade names as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, was recoverable based upon the forecasted cash flows and profitability of the brands. The Company continues to monitor performance and should there be any significant change in forecasted assumptions or estimates, including sales, profitability and discount rate, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment charge. ��
Intangible amortization expense amounted to $28.9approximately $46.0 for 2013, $26.82016, $39.9 for 20122015 and $25.2$31.7 for 2011.2014, respectively. The Company estimates that intangible amortization expense will be approximately $30.2$49.0 in 20142017 and approximately $30.0 in each of$40.0 to $50.0 annually over the next five years. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer
Domestic | | | Consumer
International | | | Specialty
Products | | | Total | | Balance December 31, 2011 | | $ | 801.0 | | | $ | 47.2 | | | $ | 20.2 | | | $ | 868.4 | | Avid Health acquired goodwill | | | 345.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 345.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance December 31, 2012 | | $ | 1,146.4 | | | $ | 47.2 | | | $ | 20.2 | | | $ | 1,213.8 | | Avid Health purchase price allocation adjustment | | | 8.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 8.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance December 31, 2013 | | $ | 1,154.8 | | | $ | 47.2 | | | $ | 20.2 | | | $ | 1,222.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer | | | Consumer | | | Specialty | | | | | | | Domestic | | | International | | | Products | | | Total | | Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 1,242.2 | | | $ | 62.6 | | | $ | 20.2 | | | $ | 1,325.0 | | VI-COR acquired goodwill | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 29.9 | | | | 29.9 | | Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | 1,242.2 | | | $ | 62.6 | | | $ | 50.1 | | | $ | 1,354.9 | | Toppik acquired goodwill | | 38.7 | | | | 13.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 52.3 | | Anusol acquired goodwill | | 0.0 | | | | 37.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 37.8 | | Other | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.9 | ) | Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 1,280.1 | | | $ | 113.9 | | | $ | 50.1 | | | $ | 1,444.1 | |
The Company performed itsresult of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test, as ofperformed in the beginning of the second quarter of 2013, and no adjustments were required. 2016, determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeded the carrying values of all reporting units. The determination of fair value contains numerous variables that are subject to change as business conditions change and therefore could impact fair value in the future. 8. Assets Held for Sale
In March 2013, the Company determined that there were no prospective buyers for its chemical business in Brazil, the assets of which had been classified as “held for sale” in Other Current Assets since December 2011. The assets were reclassified from “held for sale” and recorded as approximately $7.9 of net PP&E and $3.6 of inventories as of December 31, 2012, in the first quarter of 2013.
9. Restructuring Activities
Green River, Wyoming
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company announced its decision to relocate a portion of its Green River, Wyoming operations to a newly leased site in Victorville, California (the “Victorville Facility”). The Company relocated its cat litter manufacturing operations and distribution center to the Victorville Facility to be closer to transportation hubs and its west coast customers. The Victorville Facility began producing liquid
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)has never incurred a goodwill impairment charge.
laundry detergent and cat litter during the second quarter of 2012, and is expandable to meet future business needs. The Company’s sodium bicarbonate operations and other consumer product manufacturing will remain at the Green River facility.
The Company invested approximately $11 in 2011 and $26.5 in 2012 for a total of approximately $37.5 in capital expenditures in connection with the Victorville Facility. In connection with the opening of the Victorville Facility and changes at the Green River facility, the Company incurred transition expenses such as severance costs, accelerated depreciation of equipment at the Company’s Green River facility and one-time project expenses. The Company recorded approximately $0.7 of accelerated depreciation expense and $2.1 of other transition costs in cost of sales for the year ended 2012. The Company recorded approximately $2.3 of accelerated depreciation expenses and $1.2 of other transition costs in cost of sales for the year ended 2011. These expenditures were recorded in the Consumer Domestic segment. The expenditures related to the Victorville Facility or transition expenses related to the Green River restructuring during 2013 were immaterial.
10. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
8. | Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following: | | | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Trade accounts payable(1) | | $ | 256.7 | | | $ | 240.6 | | $ | 331.6 | | | $ | 293.9 | | Accrued marketing and promotion costs | | | 123.7 | | | | 91.2 | | | 82.0 | | | | 91.5 | | Accrued wages and related benefit costs | | | 67.0 | | | | 60.6 | | | 73.2 | | | | 59.4 | | Other accrued current liabilities(1) | | | 47.7 | | | | 39.6 | | | 82.1 | | | | 63.5 | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 495.1 | | | $ | 432.0 | | $ | 568.9 | | | $ | 508.3 | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | The Company has corrected the classification of amounts included within trade accounts payable and other accrued current liabilities as of December 31, 2012. This reclassification to the 2012 disclosure resulted in a decrease to trade accounts payable of $18.3 and a corresponding increase in other accrued current liabilities of $18.3. |
69
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) 11.9.Short-TermShort-Term Borrowings andLong-Term Debt
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt consist of the following: | | | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Short-term borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | Commercial paper issuances | | $ | 150.0 | | | $ | 250.0 | | $ | 420.0 | | | $ | 354.5 | | Various debt due to international banks | | | 3.8 | | | | 3.8 | | | 6.8 | | | | 2.7 | | | | | | | | | | Total short-term borrowings | | $ | 153.8 | | | $ | 253.8 | | $ | 426.8 | | | $ | 357.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Long-term debt | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.875% Senior notes due October 1, 2022 | | $ | 400.0 | | | $ | 400.0 | | $ | 400.0 | | | $ | 400.0 | | Less: Discount | | | (0.3 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) | 3.35% Senior notes due December 15, 2015 | | | 250.0 | | | | 250.0 | | | 2.45% Senior notes due December 15, 2019 | | | 300.0 | | | | 300.0 | | Less: Discount | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | | | | | | | Debt issuance costs, net | | | (6.5 | ) | | | (8.1 | ) | Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument | | | 0.2 | | | | 1.3 | | Net long-term debt | | $ | 649.5 | | | $ | 649.4 | | $ | 693.4 | | | $ | 692.8 | | | | | | | | | |
Revolving Credit Facility On December 4, 2015, the Company replaced its former $600.0 unsecured revolving credit facility with a $1,000.0 unsecured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has the ability to increase its borrowing up to an additional $600.0, subject to lender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes, and are used to support the Company’s $1,000.0 commercial paper program (the “Program”). Unless extended, the Credit Agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on December 4, 2020. Interest on the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement will accrue at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (x) either (at the Company’s option) (i) the adjusted LIBOR rate (generally, the LIBOR rate for an interest period selected by the Company and adjusted for statutory reserves) or (ii) the Base Rate (generally the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of America’s “prime rate” and (c) the LIBOR rate for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%) plus (y) the applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined based upon the corporate credit rating of the Company and ranges from 0.875% to 1.75% per annum, in the case of any borrowing bearing interest by reference to the adjusted LIBOR rate, and 0% to 0.75%, in the case of any borrowing bearing interest by reference to the Base Rate. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including without limitation, restrictions on the indebtedness, liens, investments, asset dispositions, fundamental changes, changes in the nature of the business conducted, affiliate transactions, burdensome agreements and use of proceeds. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain its leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to Consolidated EBITDA, at a level no greater than 3.50 to 1.00. However, if the Company consummates a material acquisition, the maximum leverage ratio increases to a level of 3.75 to 1.00 during the twelve month period commencing on the date of such acquisition. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2016. The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including without limitation, failure to make certain payments when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, events of bankruptcy, default on other indebtedness, changes in control with respect to the Company, material adverse judgments, certain events relating to pension plans and the failure of any of the loan documents relating to the Credit Agreement to remain in full force and effect. Certain parties to the 70
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) Credit Agreement, and affiliates of those parties, provide banking, investment banking and other financial services to the Company from time to time. 2.45% Senior Notes On December 9, 2014, the Company issued $300.0 aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The 2019 Notes were issued under the first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 9, 2014, to the indenture dated December 9, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. Interest on the 2019 Notes is payable semi-annually, on each June 15 and December 1. The 2019 Notes will mature on December 15, 2019, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below. The Company may redeem the 2019 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2019 Notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), plus 15 basis points. In addition, at any time on or after November 15, 2019 (one month prior to the maturity date of the notes), the Company may redeem the notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed. In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), and if, generally within 60 days thereafter, the 2019 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the First Supplemental Indenture, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the 2019 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The 2019 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding. The 2019 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such secured debt, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Base Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to create liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. These covenants are subject to a number of exceptions and qualifications. 2.875% Senior Notes On September 26, 2012, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $400issued $400.0 aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Senior Notes due October 1, 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes were issued under the second supplemental indenture (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”), dated September 26, 2012 (the “BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture”) to the indenture dated December 15, 2010 (the “Base“BNY Mellon Base Indenture”), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (“BNY Mellon”), as trustee. Interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually, beginningon each April 1 2013.and October 1. The 2022 Notes will mature on October 1, 2022, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below. The Company may redeem the 2022 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2022 Notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture), plus 20 basis points. In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” (as defined in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture), and if, generally within 60 days thereafter, the 2022 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the 2022 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The 2022 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding. The 2022 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such secured debt, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries. The BNY Mellon Base Indenture and the BNY Mellon Second Supplemental Indenture contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to create liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and 71
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company’sCompany's assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. In addition, the Company has agreed to cause each of its domestic subsidiaries that guarantees its obligations under the Credit Agreement (as defined below) to guarantee the Company’s obligations under the 2022 Notes on a senior unsecured basis. Currently, none of the Company’s subsidiaries guarantees the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement.
3.35% Senior Notes
On December 15, 2010, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of $250 aggregate principal amount of 3.35% senior notes due 2015 (the “2015 Notes”). The 2015 Notes were issued under the Base Indenture, and a first supplemental indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated December 15, 2010, between the Company and BNY Mellon, as trustee. On December 30, 2010, the proceeds of the offering were utilized to retire the outstanding $250 principal amount of the Company’s 6% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. Interest on the 2015 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2011. The 2015 Notes will mature on December 15, 2015, unless earlier retired or redeemed as described below.Commercial Paper
The Company may redeem the 2015 Notes, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, prior to their maturity date at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed; and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
thereon (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the First Supplemental Indenture), plus 25 basis points. In addition, if the Company undergoes a “change of control” as defined by the First Supplemental Indenture, and if, generally within 60 days thereafter, the 2015 Notes are rated below investment grade by each of the rating agencies designated in the First Supplemental Indenture, the Company may be required to offer to repurchase the 2015 Notes at 101% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
The 2015 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to the Company’s other senior unsecured debt from time to time outstanding. The 2015 Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured debt the Company incurs to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and will be structurally subordinated to all future and existing obligations of the Company’s subsidiaries.
The First Supplemental Indenture contains covenants with respect to the Company that, among other things, restrict the creation of liens, sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations, mergers and dispositions of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. The covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.
In addition, the Company has agreed to cause each subsidiary that guarantees its obligations under its Credit Agreement to guarantee the Company’s obligations under the 2015 Notes on a senior unsecured basis. Currently, none of the Company’s subsidiaries guarantee the Company’s obligations under its Credit Agreement.
Commercial Paper
In the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with two banks to establish a commercial paper program (the “Program”). Under the Program, the Company may issue notes from time to time up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any given time of $500.$1,000.0. The maturities of the notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days. The notes will be sold under customary terms in the commercial paper market and will be issued at a discount to par or, alternatively, will be sold at par and will bear varying interest rates based on a fixed or floating rate basis. The interest rates will vary based on market conditions and the ratings assigned to the notes by the rating agencies designated in the agreement at the time of issuance. Subject to market conditions, the Company intends to utilize the Program as its primary short-term borrowing facility and does not intend to sell unsecured commercial paper notes in excess of the available amount under the revolving credit agreement. If, for any reason, the Company is unable to access the commercial paper market, the revolving credit facility would be utilized to meet the Company’s short-term liquidity needs. The Company had $150.0$420.0 of commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 with ana weighted-average interest rate of approximately 1.0% and $354.5 as of December 31, 2015 with a weighted-average interest rate less than 0.4% and $250.0 as of December 31, 20120.8%.
Interest Rate Swaps Concurrent with anthe 2019 Notes offering, the Company entered into interest rate less than 0.5%. Revolving Credit Facility
On November 18, 2010, the Company replaced its former credit facility with a $500 unsecured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has the abilityswaps to increase its borrowing up to an additional $500, subject to lender commitments and certain conditions as described in the Credit Agreement.
On August 4, 2011, the Company amended the Credit Agreement to support its $500 commercial paper program (the “Program”). Total combined borrowing for both the Credit Agreement and the Program may not exceed $500. Unless extended, the Credit Agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable on August 4, 2016.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Interest on the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement is based, at the Company’s option, upon either (i) the Base Rate (generally equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) Bank of America’s prime rate and (c) a LIBOR-based rate plus 1.00% or (ii) the Eurocurrency Rate (generally, the LIBOR-based rate). Depending upon the better of the credit rating for either of the rating agencies designated in the Credit Agreement or the leverage ratio of the Company (described below), interest on borrowings accrues at rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% per annum above the Base Rate and 1.25% to 2.25% per annum above the Eurocurrency Rate.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including without limitation, restrictions on the indebtedness, liens, investments, asset dispositions, fundamental changes,hedge changes in the naturefair value of the business conducted, affiliate transactions, burdensome agreements and use of proceeds.
2019 Notes. Under the Credit Agreement,terms of the swaps, the counterparties will pay the Company a fixed rate of 2.45% and the Company will pay interest at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus a fixed spread of 0.756%. The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements is required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of “Consolidated EBITDA” (as definedreflected in the Credit Agreement)Consolidated Balance Sheet within Other Assets or Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to Consolidated Interest Charges (as defined inadjust the Credit Agreement),carrying amount of 3.00 to 1.00. The Company also is required to keep its leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to Consolidated EBITDA, below a level of 3.25 to 1.00. However, if the Company consummates a material acquisition, the maximum leverage ratio increases to a level of 3.50 to 1.00 during the twelve month period commencing on the date of such acquisition.hedged debt obligation. Other Debt The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including without limitation, failure to make certain payments when due, materially incorrect representations and warranties, breach of covenants, events of bankruptcy, default on other indebtedness, changes in control with respect to the Company, material adverse judgments, certain events relating to pension plans and the failure of any of the loan documents relating to the Credit Agreement to remain in full force and effect. Certain parties to the Credit Agreement, and affiliates of those parties, provide banking, investment banking and other financial services to the Company from time to time. Other Debt
QGNCompany’s Brazilian subsidiary has lines of credit that enable it to borrow in its local currency subject to various interest rates that fluctuate with the interbank interest rate. The various credit lines of credit will expire during the first two quarters of 2014, butand are expected to be renewed.renewed on a regular basis. Amounts available under the lines of credit total $5.6.$3.1 at current exchange rates. There were borrowings of $3.8$2.5 and $2.7 outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, respectively, under the lines of credit. In addition, this subsidiary has taken out three fixed term, fixed interest loans totaling $4.3, at the current exchange rate, with guarantees from the Company. These loans will come due in the first, second and third quarters of 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company decided to sell its Brazilian chemical business to focus on its Brazilian consumer business. The Company anticipates the transaction to close during the first quarter of 2017.
12. Income Taxes
The components of income before taxes are as follows: | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Domestic | | $ | 544.5 | | | $ | 481.8 | | | $ | 441.1 | | | $ | 665.0 | | | $ | 595.6 | | | $ | 574.1 | | Foreign | | | 53.3 | | | | 60.7 | | | | 53.5 | | | | 40.9 | | | | 39.8 | | | | 50.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | $ | 597.8 | | | $ | 542.5 | | | $ | 494.6 | | | $ | 705.9 | | | $ | 635.4 | | | $ | 624.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
72
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) The following table summarizes the provision for U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes: | | | | 2013 | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. federal | | $ | 151.7 | | | $ | 132.0 | | | $ | 92.7 | | | $ | 183.4 | | | $ | 161.4 | | | $ | 159.0 | | State | | | 24.7 | | | | 27.7 | | | | 16.3 | | | | 27.2 | | | | 25.5 | | | | 24.4 | | Foreign | | | 15.9 | | | | 19.8 | | | | 16.6 | | | | 11.4 | | | | 14.1 | | | | 14.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 222.0 | | | | 201.0 | | | | 198.3 | | | | | 192.3 | | | | 179.5 | | | | 125.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. federal | | | 12.6 | | | | 11.4 | | | | 48.7 | | | | 19.2 | | | | 22.8 | | | | 11.5 | | State | | | (1.7 | ) | | | 1.6 | | | | (3.3 | ) | | | 4.1 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 1.1 | | Foreign | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 14.0 | | | | 1.6 | | | | (2.1 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24.9 | | | | 24.0 | | | | 12.7 | | | | | 11.1 | | | | 13.2 | | | | 59.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total provision | | $ | 203.4 | | | $ | 192.7 | | | $ | 185.0 | | | $ | 246.9 | | | $ | 225.0 | | | $ | 211.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at December 31: | | | | 2013 | | 2012 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accounts receivable | | $ | 4.4 | | | $ | 6.5 | | | $ | 4.8 | | | $ | 4.6 | | Deferred compensation | | | 57.2 | | | | 49.7 | | | | 69.7 | | | | 67.9 | | Pension, postretirement and postemployment benefits | | | 9.7 | | | | 16.5 | | | | 7.7 | | | | 8.7 | | Reserves | | | 31.6 | | | | 26.1 | | | Investment in Natronx | | | | 7.7 | | | | 7.7 | | Other | | | | 30.8 | | | | 24.4 | | Tax credit carryforwards/other tax attributes | | | 1.5 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 12.8 | | | | 14.4 | | International operating loss carryforwards | | | 8.1 | | | | 9.2 | | | | 8.0 | | | | 6.2 | | | | | | | | | | Total gross deferred tax assets | | | 112.5 | | | | 109.2 | | | | 141.5 | | | | 133.9 | | Valuation allowances | | | (13.0 | ) | | | (15.7 | ) | | | (20.2 | ) | | | (16.3 | ) | | | | | | | | | Total deferred tax assets | | | 99.5 | | | | 93.5 | | | | 121.3 | | | | 117.6 | | | | | | | | | | Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Goodwill | | | (159.7 | ) | | | (145.1 | ) | | | (212.3 | ) | | | (193.5 | ) | Tradenames and other intangibles | | | (292.2 | ) | | | (289.4 | ) | | Trade names and other intangibles | | | | (322.9 | ) | | | (312.4 | ) | Property, plant and equipment | | | (106.2 | ) | | | (108.8 | ) | | | (97.1 | ) | | | (95.6 | ) | | | | | | | | | Total deferred tax liabilities | | | (558.1 | ) | | | (543.3 | ) | | | (632.3 | ) | | | (601.5 | ) | | | | | | | | | Net deferred tax liability | | $ | (458.6 | ) | | $ | (449.8 | ) | | $ | (511.0 | ) | | $ | (483.9 | ) | | | | | | | | | Current net deferred tax asset | | $ | 16.6 | | | $ | 17.6 | | | Long term net deferred tax asset | | | 0.8 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 0.9 | | Long term net deferred tax liability | | | (476.0 | ) | | | (470.0 | ) | | | (512.2 | ) | | | (484.8 | ) | | | | | | | | | Net deferred tax liability | | $ | (458.6 | ) | | $ | (449.8 | ) | | $ | (511.0 | ) | | $ | (483.9 | ) | | | | | | | | |
73
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) The difference between tax expense and the tax that would result from the application of the federal statutory rate is as follows: | | | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Statutory rate | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 35 | % | Tax that would result from use of the federal statutory rate | | $ | 209.2 | | | $ | 189.9 | | | $ | 173.1 | | | $ | 247.1 | | | $ | 222.4 | | | $ | 218.7 | | State and local income tax, net of federal effect | | | 14.9 | | | | 19.0 | | | | 12.1 | | | | 20.3 | | | | 18.7 | | | | 16.5 | | Varying tax rates of foreign affiliates | | | (3.1 | ) | | | (1.8 | ) | | | (2.5 | ) | | | (4.1 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) | | | (3.6 | ) | Benefit from domestic manufacturing deduction | | | (13.2 | ) | | | (11.6 | ) | | | (8.3 | ) | | | (14.2 | ) | | | (14.4 | ) | | | (14.3 | ) | Resolution of tax contingencies | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.2 | ) | | | (3.7 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (1.5 | ) | Valuation Allowances | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 14.3 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 8.5 | | | | 0.9 | | Other | | | (5.0 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (5.1 | ) | | | (7.6 | ) | | | (5.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | Recorded tax expense | | $ | 203.4 | | | $ | 192.7 | | | $ | 185.0 | | | $ | 246.9 | | | $ | 225.0 | | | $ | 211.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Effective tax rate | | | 34.0 | % | | | 35.5 | % | | | 37.4 | % | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.4 | % | | | 33.8 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, 2013,2016, certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $28.0.$26.3. Approximately $3.7$1.0 of such net operating loss carryforwards expire on various dates through December 31, 2018.2021. The remaining net operating loss carryforwards are not subject to expiration. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from these net operating loss carryforwards will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, the Company has provided a valuation allowance of $8.1$8.0 and $9.2$6.2 at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, on the deferred tax asset relating to these net operating loss carryforwards. The Company also believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain additional deferred tax assets of QGNa foreign subsidiary will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, the Company maintains a valuation allowance of $4.9$4.5 and $6.5$2.4 at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, on these deferred tax assets. In 2015, the Company reported an impairment charge relating to its investment in Natronx. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that a tax benefit relating to the impairment will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, the Company established a valuation allowance of $7.7 in 2015, and maintains a valuation allowance of $7.7 at December 31, 2016. In 2015, the Company liquidated its subsidiary in the Netherlands and decided that the earnings of its subsidiary in France would no longer be permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. As a result, the Company repatriated cash of $93.0. The funds repatriated were used to reduce outstanding commercial paper. As a result of liquidating its subsidiary in the Netherlands, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $2.7 in the 2015 Consolidated Statement of Income and a deferred tax benefit of $11.6 through Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The Company had undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries of approximately $271.8$142.9 at December 31, 20132016 for which U.S deferred taxes have not been provided. These earnings, which are considered to be permanently reinvested, would be subject to U.S. tax if they were remitted as dividends. It is not practicable to determine the deferred tax liability on these earnings because of the large number of assumptions necessary to compute the tax. The Company continues to monitor events or circumstances that may change its intention to remit undistributed earnings. TheIn prior years, the Company has recorded liabilities in connection with uncertain tax positions, which, although supportable by the Company, may be challenged by tax authorities. Under applicable accounting guidance, these tax positions do not meet the minimum threshold required for the related tax benefit to be recognized in the income statement. The Company has no uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016.
74
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 | | $ | 9.1 | | | $ | 13.1 | | | $ | 24.6 | | Gross increases—tax positions in prior period | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.0 | | Gross decreases—tax positions in prior period | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.2 | ) | | | (5.5 | ) | Settlements | | | (3.7 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) | | | (6.8 | ) | Lapse of statute of limitations | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 | | $ | 5.9 | | | $ | 9.1 | | | $ | 13.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 4.0 | | | $ | 5.9 | | Gross increases - tax positions in prior period | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Gross decreases - tax positions in prior period | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.7 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | Settlements | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Lapse of statute of limitations | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 4.0 | |
In 2012,2014, the Company recognized a benefit from the reversal of approximately $3.3$1.7 in income tax expense and incurred $0.2$0.1 in pretax interest expense associated with certain tax liabilities as athe result of the settlement of an IRS audit for the years 20082010, 2011 and 20092012 and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitation of several state taxing authorities. In 2011, the Company recognized a benefit from the reversal of approximately $3.7 in income tax expense and $1.6 in pretax interest expense associated with certain tax liabilities as a result of the settlement of various state audits and the lapse of applicable statutes of limitation of several state taxing authorities. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are $5.7, $8.7 and $12.1, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, are $0.2, $0.4 and $1.0, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in adjustments to balance sheet tax accounts, primarily deferred taxes.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state and international jurisdictions. The IRS has completed its audit of tax years 2010 and 2011 arethrough 2012. The Company is currently under audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and several state and international taxing authorities. In addition, certain statutes of limitations are scheduled to expire inauthorities for the near future.years 2013 through 2015. The Company does not anticipate that the settlement of audits and the expirations of statutes of limitations within the next twelve months will result in a significant change in unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s policy for recording interest associated with uncertain tax positions is to record interest as a component of income before income taxes. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013,2016, the Company did not recognize any interest expense relating to uncertain tax positions. During the twelve months ended December 31, 20122015 and December 31, 2011,2014, the Company recognized a net reversal of accrued interest expense associated with uncertain tax positions of approximately $0.1, $0.3,$0.2, and $1.9,$0.1, respectively. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had $0.3 and $0.4, respectively, inno accrued interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits. 13.
11.Stock Based Compensation Plans and Other Benefit Plans Defined Benefit Retirement Plans
The Company has defined benefit pensionoptions outstanding under four equity compensation plans. Under the Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Plan, the Company may grant options and other stock-based awards to employees and directors. Under the 1983 Stock Option Plan and the Stock Award Plan, the Company granted options to key management employees. Under the Stock Option Plan for Directors, the Company granted options to non‑employee directors. Following adoption of the original Omnibus Equity Plan by stockholders in 2008, no further grants were permitted under the other equity compensation plans. Options outstanding under the plans covering certain international employees. Pension benefits to retired employees are basedissued at market value on the date of grant, vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant and must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. If, upon the employees’ lengthtermination of a participant’s employment (other than a termination for cause), a participant is at least 55 years old, has at least five years of service, and a percentagethe sum of their qualifying compensation during the finalparticipant’s age and years of employment. The Company’s pension funding policyservice is consistent with federal/statutory funding requirements and,at least 65, the participant may exercise any stock options granted in December 2013,2007 or later within a period of three years from the Companydate of termination or, if earlier, the date such stock options otherwise would have expired, subject to specified conditions. Issuances of Common Stock to satisfy employee option exercises currently are made voluntary contributions of $13.0 to its international plans. The Company also maintains unfunded postretirement plans, which provide medical benefits for eligible U.S. retirees and their dependents and for retirees and employees in Canada. The cost of such benefits is recognized during the employees’ respective active working careers. The Company recognizes the unfunded status of a benefit plan in the balance sheet as a long-term liability and recognizes the overfunded status of any benefit plan as a long-term asset. Any previously unrecognized gains or losses are recorded in the equity section of the balance sheet within accumulated other comprehensive income. from treasury stock.75
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) Stock option transactions for the three years ended December 31, 2016 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | Average | | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | Remaining | | | Aggregate | | | | | | | Exercise | | | Contractual | | | Intrinsic | | | Options | | | Price | | | Term | | | Value | | Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | | 17.5 | | | $ | 19.74 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | 2.3 | | | | 34.81 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | (2.6 | ) | | | 12.57 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | (0.2 | ) | | | 28.16 | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 | | 17.0 | | | $ | 22.75 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | 2.2 | | | | 41.91 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | (1.8 | ) | | | 15.56 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | (0.2 | ) | | | 30.95 | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 | | 17.2 | | | $ | 25.89 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | 2.1 | | | | 46.75 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | (3.0 | ) | | | 16.96 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | (0.3 | ) | | | 39.60 | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 | | 16.0 | | | $ | 30.06 | | | | 5.8 | | | $ | 233.5 | | Exercisable as of December 31, 2016 | | 9.7 | | | $ | 22.91 | | | | 4.3 | | | $ | 207.0 | |
The following table summarizes information relating to options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2016: | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | Outstanding | | | Average | | | Average | | | Exercisable | | | Average | | Range of | | as of | | | Remaining | | | Exercise | | | as of | | | Exercise | | Exercise Prices | | 12/31/2016 | | | Contractual Life | | | Price | | | 12/31/2016 | | | Price | | $10.01 - $15.00 | | | 2.2 | | | | 1.8 | | | $ | 13.58 | | | | 2.2 | | | $ | 13.58 | | $15.01 - $20.00 | | | 1.2 | | | | 3.4 | | | $ | 16.68 | | | | 1.2 | | | $ | 16.68 | | $20.01 - $25.00 | | | 1.4 | | | | 4.3 | | | $ | 20.32 | | | | 1.4 | | | $ | 20.32 | | $25.01 - $30.00 | | | 2.3 | | | | 5.2 | | | $ | 26.91 | | | | 2.3 | | | $ | 26.91 | | $30.01 - $35.00 | | | 4.8 | | | | 6.4 | | | $ | 32.65 | | | | 2.6 | | | $ | 30.98 | | $40.01 - $45.00 | | | 2.8 | | | | 8.4 | | | $ | 41.88 | | | | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.00 | | $45.01 - $50.00 | | | 1.3 | | | | 9.4 | | | $ | 49.36 | | | | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | | | 16.0 | | | | 5.8 | | | $ | 30.06 | | | | 9.7 | | | $ | 22.91 | |
The table above represents the Company’s estimate of options fully vested and expected to vest. Expected forfeitures are not material and, therefore, are not reflected in the table above. The following table provides information onregarding the statusintrinsic value of the defined benefit plans at December 31:stock options exercised and stock compensation expense related to stock option awards: | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Intrinsic Value of Stock Options Exercised | $ | 91.5 | | | $ | 49.0 | | | $ | 58.0 | | Stock Compensation Expense Related to Stock Option Awards | $ | 14.4 | | | $ | 14.8 | | | $ | 15.2 | | Issued Stock Options | | 2.1 | | | | 2.2 | | | | 2.3 | | Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options issued (per share) | $ | 7.57 | | | $ | 6.85 | | | $ | 6.41 | | Fair Value of Stock Options Issued | $ | 16.1 | | | $ | 15.3 | | | $ | 15.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Plans | | | Nonpension
Postretirement Plans | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Change in Benefit Obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Benefit obligation at beginning of year | | $ | 99.7 | | | $ | 88.1 | | | $ | 30.0 | | | $ | 27.2 | | Service cost | | | 1.1 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.4 | | Interest cost | | | 4.0 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.2 | | Plan participants’ contributions | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.2 | | Actuarial loss (gain) | | | 0.7 | | | | 7.0 | | | | (4.9 | ) | | | 2.5 | | Settlements/curtailments | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (2.7 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | Effects of exchange rate changes / other | | | (0.9 | ) | | | 3.6 | | | | (0.4 | ) | | | 0.1 | | Benefits paid | | | (4.0 | ) | | | (4.1 | ) | | | (2.0 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Benefit obligation at end of year | | $ | 100.6 | | | $ | 99.7 | | | $ | 21.8 | | | $ | 30.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change in Plan Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | $ | 78.8 | | | $ | 70.5 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Actual return on plan assets (net of expenses) | | | 8.1 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Employer contributions | | | 17.5 | | | | 4.4 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.0 | | Plan participants’ contributions | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.2 | | Effects of exchange rate changes / other | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 2.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Benefits paid | | | (4.0 | ) | | | (4.1 | ) | | | (2.0 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of plan assets at end of year | | $ | 100.2 | | | $ | 78.8 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Funded status at end of year, recorded in Pension and Postretirement Benefits | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (20.9 | ) | | $ | (21.8 | ) | | $ | (30.0 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prior Service Credit | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | (2.3 | ) | | $ | (0.8 | ) | Actuarial Loss | | | 18.5 | | | | 23.4 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 5.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Loss (Income) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | $ | 18.6 | | | $ | 23.6 | | | $ | (1.5 | ) | | $ | 5.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:76
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Plans | | | Nonpension
Postretirement Plans | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Pension and Postretirement Benefits | | $ | (3.4 | ) | | $ | (20.9 | ) | | $ | (21.8 | ) | | $ | (30.0 | ) | Other Assets | | | 3.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Income) | | | 18.6 | | | | 23.6 | | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 5.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net amount recognized at end of year | | $ | 18.2 | | | $ | 2.7 | | | $ | (23.3 | ) | | $ | (24.9 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated benefit obligation | | $ | 95.4 | | | $ | 96.3 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2013, the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income) was a $5.0 decrease in the Company’s remaining pension plan obligations and a $6.6 decrease in postretirement benefit plan obligations. The changes are related to the change in discount rates for all plans and other actuarial assumptions.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) The following table provides a summary of the assumptions used in the valuation of issued stock options: | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Risk-free interest rate | | 1.7 | % | | | 2.0 | % | | | 2.0 | % | Expected life in years | | 6.8 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 6.2 | | Expected volatility | | 17.0 | % | | | 17.2 | % | | | 20.4 | % | Dividend yield | | 1.5 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | 1.8 | % |
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as
The fair value of stock options is based upon the Black Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the stock options’ lives based on historical exercise behavior and their expected volatility and dividend yield based on the historical changes in stock price and dividend payments. The risk free interest rate is based on the yield of an applicable term Treasury instrument. As of December 31, are as follows:2016, there was a fair value of $8.9 related to unamortized stock option compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over the next three years. The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow reflect an add back to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of $16.0, $16.1 and $17.0 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for non-cash compensation expense, primarily stock option expense. Cash flow from Financing Activities includes $30.0, $15.8 and $18.5 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of excess tax benefits on stock options exercised. The total tax benefit for 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $30.0, $15.8 and $18.8, respectively. Other Benefit Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Plans | | | Nonpension
Postretirement Plans | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Discount Rate | | | 4.48 | % | | | 4.16 | % | | | 4.56 | % | | | 3.89 | % | Rate of Compensation increase | | | 3.33 | % | | | 3.33 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
NetInternational Pension and Net Postretirement Benefit Costs consistedPlan Terminations
In 2016 the Company authorized the termination of international defined benefit pension plans under which approximately 336 participants, including 53 active employees, have accrued benefits. The Company anticipates completing the termination of this plan by the end of the following components: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Costs | | | Nonpension Postretirement Costs | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Service cost | | $ | 1.1 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.4 | | Interest cost | | | 4.0 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.6 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 1.3 | | Expected return on plan assets | | | (4.2 | ) | | | (3.9 | ) | | | (4.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Amortization of prior service cost | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.1 | | Settlements/curtailments | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Recognized actuarial loss (gain) | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 1.4 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average assumptions usedsecond quarter of 2017, once regulatory approvals are obtained. In addition to determine net periodic benefit costplan assets, the Company will need to make a one-time payment of $20.0 to $26.0 ($14.0 to $19.0 after tax) to purchase annuities for years ended December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Plans | | | Nonpension Postretirement Plans | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Discount Rate | | | 4.15 | % | | | 4.75 | % | | | 5.34 | % | | | 3.92 | % | | | 4.31 | % | | | 5.28 | % | Rate of Compensation increase | | | 3.33 | % | | | 3.33 | % | | | 3.68 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | | 5.45 | % | | | 5.35 | % | | | 5.87 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
participants. The Company’sCompany estimates that it will incur a one-time expense of $49.0 to $55.0 ($40.0 to $45.0 after tax) in 2017 when the plan settlement is completed. This expense primarily includes the effect of the additional cash payment required at settlement and pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed with the assistancesettlement accounting rules which require accelerated recognition of actuarial valuations. These valuations reflect key assumptions provided bylosses that were to be amortized over the Company to its actuaries, including the discount rate and expected long-term ratebenefit lives of return on plan assets. Material changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions. participants. The discount rateestimated expense is subject to change each year, consistent with changesbased on valuations at the actual date of settlement. Upon the termination of these plans in applicable high-quality, long-term corporate bond indices. Based on the expected duration of the benefit payments for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement plans,2017, the Company referswill have no further obligations with respect to an applicable index and expected term of the benefit payments to select a discount rate at which it believes the plan benefits could be effectively settled. The expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is selected by taking into account the historical trend, the expected duration of the projected benefit obligation for the plans, the asset mix of the plans and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation. A 50 basis point change in the expected long-term rate of return would result in an approximate $0.5 change in pension expense for 2014.
In 2014, amounts related tomaterial defined benefit plans in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized inpension plans.
On December 31, 2014, the income statement are estimated to be income of approximately $1.2. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The Company’s investment policy is designed to provide flexibility in the asset mix based on management’s assessment of economic conditions, withCompany terminated an overall objective of realizing maximum rates of return appropriately balanced to minimize market risks. The Company’s long-term strategic goal is to maintain an asset mix consisting of approximately 60% equity securities and 40% debt/guaranteed investment securities.
The fair values of the Company’sinternational defined benefit pension plan assets by asset category are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets | | | Significant
Observable
Inputs | | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs | | | | Total | | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | Asset Category | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash & Cash Equivalents | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Equity Securities—Mutual Funds(a) | | | 14.3 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 13.4 | | | | 0.0 | | Bond Funds(b) | | | 9.8 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 9.7 | | | | 0.0 | | Global Multi-strategy Fund(c) | | | 31.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 31.8 | | Insurance Investment Contract(d) | | | 5.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 5.3 | | Government Fixed Income Securities(e) | | | 15.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 15.0 | | | | 0.0 | | Other(f) | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | $ | 78.8 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 39.6 | | | $ | 37.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash & Cash Equivalents | | $ | 9.0 | | | $ | 9.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Equity Securities—Mutual Funds(a) | | | 16.1 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 15.1 | | | | 0.0 | | Money Market Funds | | | 6.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 6.6 | | | | 0.0 | | Bond Funds(b) | | | 9.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 9.3 | | | | 0.0 | | Global Multi-strategy Fund(c) | | | 37.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 37.8 | | Insurance Investment Contract(d) | | | 5.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 5.9 | | Government Fixed Income Securities(e) | | | 15.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 15.3 | | | | 0.0 | | Other(f) | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2013 | | $ | 100.2 | | | $ | 10.2 | | | $ | 46.3 | | | $ | 43.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | The equity securities represent mutual funds held primarily by the pension plans in Canada, which include both domestic and international equity securities. Mutual funds are valued at quoted market prices, which represent the net asset values of shares held by the plans as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. |
(b) | The bond funds constitutes investments primarily for the pension plans in Canada and the fund consists of investments in Canadian government, corporate and municipal or local governments bonds. |
(c) | The global multi-strategy fund constitutes investments for the pension plans in the United Kingdom. The fund is a fund of funds invested in a series of diverse international equity funds and fixed income funds. The Global Multi-strategy fund is valued at quoted market prices which represent the net asset value of the units held at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. |
(d) | The insurance investment contract is in the form of an insurance policy that is held by the pension plans in the United Kingdom. The investment of the underlying assets is in various managed funds. Insurance contracts are valued at book value, which approximates fair value, and are calculated using the prior year balance adjusted for investment returns and changes in cash flows. |
(e) | Government fixed income securities held by pension plans in the United Kingdom are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date. |
(f) | Other category includes other investments for pension plans in the International subsidiaries. |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollarsunder which approximately 270 participants, including approximately 90 active employees, had accrued benefits. The Company completed the termination of this plan in millions, except share and per share data)
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 Investments) are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Global Multi-
strategy Fund | | | Insurance
Investment
Contract | | | Total | | Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 27.7 | | | $ | 4.7 | | | $ | 32.4 | | Net realized and unrealized gains (loss) | | | 2.8 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 3.2 | | Effects of exchange rate changes | | | 1.3 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 1.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance at December 31, 2012 | | $ | 31.8 | | | $ | 5.3 | | | $ | 37.1 | | Net realized and unrealized gains (loss) | | | 5.3 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 5.8 | | Effects of exchange rate changes | | | 0.7 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 37.8 | | | $ | 5.9 | | | $ | 43.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
the second quarter of 2015, after regulatory approvals were obtained. The Company made a cash contributionscontribution of approximately $17.5$0.5 to itsprovide for final accrued benefits and recorded a one-time expense in SG&A of $8.9 ($6.7 after tax) in the Consumer International segment when the plan settlement was completed. This expense is primarily attributable to pension plans in 2013, including voluntary contributionssettlement accounting rules which require accelerated recognition of $13.0. The Company estimates it will be required to make cash contributions to its pension plans of approximately $3.4 in 2014 to offset 2014 benefit payments and administrative costs in excess of investment returns. The following benefit payments are expectedactuarial losses that were to be paid fromamortized over the definedexpected benefit plans:lives of participants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | Pension
Plans | | | Nonpension
Postretirement
Plans | | 2014 | | $ | 4.3 | | | $ | 1.3 | | 2015 | | | 4.8 | | | | 1.3 | | 2016 | | | 4.7 | | | | 1.4 | | 2017 | | | 4.7 | | | | 1.5 | | 2018 | | | 4.7 | | | | 1.6 | | 2019-2023 | | | 25.5 | | | | 8.9 | |
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation has been determined by application of the provisions of the Company’s medical plans, including established maximums and sharing of costs, relevant actuarial assumptions andhealth-care cost trend rates projected at approximately 7.6% for 2014 and decreasing to an ultimate rate of approximately 4.5% in 2029. The Company has a maximum annual benefit based on years of service for participants over 65 years of age.
The following chart shows the effect of a 1% change in healthcare cost trends:
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | Effect of 1% increase in health-care cost trend rates on: | | | | | | | | | Postretirement benefit obligation | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 1.7 | | Total of service cost and interest cost component | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.2 | | Effect of 1% decrease in health-care cost trend rates on: | | | | | | | | | Postretirement benefit obligation | | | (0.6 | ) | | | (1.4 | ) | Total of service cost and interest cost component | | | (0.7 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
Other Benefit Plans
The Company also maintains a defined contribution profit sharing plan for domestic salaried and certain hourly employees. Amounts charged to earnings for this plan were $15.8, $13.5 and $10.5 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company also has a domestic employee 401K savings plan. The Company matches 50% of each employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s earnings. The Company’s matching contributions to the savings plan were $4.5, $3.8 and $3.7 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company has an employee stock purchase plan which permits employees to purchase the Company’s Common Stock (“Common Stock”) at a 15% discount to the prevailing market price. No more than $25 thousand can be purchased by any one employee during a plan year. The 15% discount is included in SG&A expenses. Total expenses were $0.6 for 2013 and $0.5 in each of 2012 and 2011.
Deferred Compensation Plans The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan under which certain members of management are eligible to defer a maximum of 85% of their regular compensation (i.e. salary) and incentive bonus. The amounts deferred under this plan are credited with earnings or losses based upon changes in values of notional investments elected by the plan participant. The investment options available include notional investments in various stock, bond and money market funds as well as Common Stock. Each plan participant is fully vested in the amounts the participant defers. The plan also functions as an “excess” plan andwhereby profit sharing contributions that cannot otherwise be contributed to the qualified savings and profit sharing plan due to limitations under Department of Treasury regulations are credited to this plan. These contributions vest under the same vesting schedule applicable to the qualified plan. The liability to plan participants for contributions designated for notional investment in Common Stock is based on the quoted fair value of the Common Stock plus any dividends credited. The Company uses cash-settled hedging instruments to minimize the cost related to the volatility of Common Stock. At December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, the amount of the Company’s liability under the deferred compensation plan is included in Deferred and Other Long-term Liabilities and was $83.5$98.3 and $73.0,$95.8, respectively and the funded balances recorded in Other Assets amounted to $62.8$73.9 and $55.3,$70.6, respectively. The amounts charged to earnings, including the effect of the hedges, totaled $2.8, $2.6,$2.3, $2.1, and $2.9$1.8 in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. 77
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) Non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors are eligible to defer up to 100% of their directors’ compensation into a similar plan; however, the only option for investment is Common Stock. DirectorsMembers of the Board are fully vested in their account balance. As of December 31, 2013,2016, there waswere approximately 125307 thousand shares of Common Stock from shares held as Treasury Stock in a rabbi trust to protect the interest of the directors’ deferred compensation plan participants in the event of a change of control. 14. Stock Based Compensation Plans
The Company has options outstanding
On November 2, 2016, the Board authorized a new share repurchase program, under four equity compensation plans. Under the Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Plan,which the Company may grant options and other stock-based awardsrepurchase up to employees and directors. Under the 1983 Stock Option Plan and the Stock Award Plan, the Company granted options to key management employees. Under the Stock Option Plan for Directors, the Company granted options tonon-employee directors. Following adoption of the original Omnibus Equity Plan by stockholders$500 million in 2008, no further grants were permitted under the other equity compensation plans. Options outstanding under the plans are issued at market value on the date of grant, vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant and must be CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
exercised within ten years of the date of grant. If, upon termination of a participant’s employment (other than a termination for cause), a participant is at least 55 years old, has at least five years of service, and the sum of the participant’s age and years of service is at least 65, the participant may exercise any stock options granted in 2007 or later within a period of three years from the date of termination or, if earlier, the date such stock options otherwise would have expired, subject to specified conditions. Issuancesshares of Common Stock (the “2016 Share Repurchase Program”). The 2016 Share Repurchase Program does not have an expiration and replaced the 2015 Share Repurchase Program. The Company also continued its evergreen share repurchase program, authorized by the Board on January 29, 2014, under which the Company may repurchase, from time to satisfy employee option exercises currently are made from treasury stock.
time, Common Stock option transactions for the three years ended December 31, 2013 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Options | | | Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price | | | Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | | | Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(In millions) | | Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | | | 8.8 | | | $ | 22.63 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | | 1.2 | | | | 40.60 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | | (1.6 | ) | | | 16.53 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 30.22 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding at December 31, 2011 | | | 8.3 | | | | 26.39 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | | 1.6 | | | | 53.81 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 19.00 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 35.57 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | | | 8.2 | | | | 32.81 | | | | | | | | | | Granted | | | 1.7 | | | | 61.89 | | | | | | | | | | Exercised | | | (1.0 | ) | | | 21.47 | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 47.47 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | | | 8.8 | | | $ | 39.47 | | | | 6.2 | | | $ | 235.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | | 4.5 | | | $ | 26.08 | | | | 4.2 | | | $ | 180.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes information relating to options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | | Range of Exercise Prices | | Outstanding
as of
12/31/2013 | | | Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life | | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | | Exercisable
as of
12/31/2013 | | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | $5.01 - $15.00 | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.5 | | | $ | 14.82 | | | | 0.2 | | | $ | 14.82 | | $15.01 - $25.00 | | | 1.4 | | | | 2.6 | | | $ | 20.44 | | | | 1.4 | | | $ | 20.44 | | $25.01 - $35.00 | | | 2.9 | | | | 5.1 | | | $ | 29.40 | | | | 2.9 | | | $ | 29.40 | | $35.01 - $45.00 | | | 1.1 | | | | 7.0 | | | $ | 40.62 | | | | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | $45.01 - $55.00 | | | 1.5 | | | | 8.3 | | | $ | 53.80 | | | | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | $55.01 - $67.00 | | | 1.7 | | | | 9.4 | | | $ | 61.91 | | | | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8.8 | | | | 6.2 | | | $ | 39.47 | | | | 4.5 | | | $ | 26.08 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The table above representsreduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s estimateincentive plans.
In 2016, the Company purchased approximately 9.0 million shares of options fully vestedCommon Stock for $400.0, of which $103.0 was purchased under the evergreen share repurchase program, $200.0 was purchased under the 2016 Share Repurchase Program, and expected to vest. Expected forfeitures are not material and, therefore, are not reflected in$97.0 was purchased under the table above. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The following table provides information regarding the intrinsic value of stock options exercised, stock compensation expense related to stock option awards and the fair value of stock options issued:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Intrinsic Value of Stock Options Exercised | | $ | 42.2 | | | $ | 48.9 | | | $ | 39.6 | | Stock Compensation Expense Related to Stock Option Awards | | $ | 15.5 | | | $ | 11.0 | | | $ | 10.0 | | Issued Stock Options | | | 1.7 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 1.2 | | Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options issued (per share) | | $ | 10.92 | | | $ | 8.92 | | | $ | 7.87 | | Fair Value of Stock Options Issued | | $ | 18.1 | | | $ | 14.2 | | | $ | 9.5 | |
The following table provides2015 Share Repurchase Program. As a summaryresult of the assumptions used inCompany’s purchases, there remained $300.0 under the valuation of issued stock options:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.4 | % | | | 1.0 | % | | | 2.0 | % | Expected life in Years | | | 6.2 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 6.2 | | Expected volatility | | | 21.2 | % | | | 20.7 | % | | | 20.9 | % | Dividend Yield | | | 1.8 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | 1.7 | % |
The fair value of stock options is based upon the Black Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the options’ life based on historical exercise behavior and their expected volatility and dividend yield based on the historical changes in stock price and dividend payments. The risk free interest rate is based on the yield of an applicable term Treasury instrument.
As2016 Share Repurchase Program as of December 31, 2013, there was a fair value of $10.6 related to unamortized stock option compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately one and a half years. The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow reflect an add back to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of $17.0, $12.4 and $11.0 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for non-cash compensation expense, primarily stock option expense. Net Cash Used in Financing Activities includes $13.1, $14.6 and $12.1 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of excess tax benefits on stock options exercised. The total tax benefit for 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $13.4, $15.4 and $13.3, respectively.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)2016.
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
13. | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive income is defined as net income and other changes in stockholders’ equity from transactions and other events from sources other than stockholders. The components of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Foreign
Currency
Adjustments | | | Defined
Benefit
Plans | | | Derivative
Agreements | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | Balance December 31, 2010 | | $ | 24.5 | | | $ | (8.0 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 16.3 | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | (7.3 | ) | | | (10.0 | ) | | | 1.5 | | | | (15.8 | ) | Tax benefit (expense) | | | 0.0 | | | | 2.7 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | 2.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (7.3 | ) | | | (7.3 | ) | | | 1.2 | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance December 31, 2011 | | $ | 17.2 | | | $ | (15.3 | ) | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 2.9 | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | 5.6 | | | | (6.8 | ) | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (2.1 | ) | Tax benefit (expense) | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 1.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 5.6 | | | | (5.2 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance December 31, 2012 | | $ | 22.8 | | | $ | (20.5 | ) | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 2.5 | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | (10.1 | ) | | | 11.2 | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | 0.3 | | Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of income(a) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.0 | | Tax benefit (expense) | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.7 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | (3.6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (10.1 | ) | | | 7.5 | | | | 0.3 | | | | (2.3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balance December 31, 2013 | | $ | 12.7 | | | $ | (13.0 | ) | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | Foreign | | | Defined | | | | | | | Other | | | Currency | | | Benefit | | | Derivative | | | Comprehensive | | | Adjustments | | | Plans | | | Agreements | | | Income (Loss) | | Balance December 31, 2013 | $ | 12.7 | | | $ | (13.0 | ) | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.2 | | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | (29.1 | ) | | | (7.7 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (37.6 | ) | Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of income(a) | | 0.0 | | | | 0.8 | | | | (1.4 | ) | | | (0.6 | ) | Tax benefit (expense) | | 0.0 | | | | 2.2 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 3.3 | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | (29.1 | ) | | | (4.7 | ) | | | (1.1 | ) | | | (34.9 | ) | Balance December 31, 2014 | $ | (16.4 | ) | | $ | (17.7 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (34.7 | ) | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | (35.8 | ) | | | 3.0 | | | | 9.6 | | | | (23.2 | ) | Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of income(a) | | 0.0 | | | | 5.2 | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | 2.2 | | Tax benefit (expense) | | 13.7 | | | | (2.0 | ) | | | (1.9 | ) | | | 9.8 | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | (22.1 | ) | | | 6.2 | | | | 4.7 | | | | (11.2 | ) | Balance December 31, 2015 | $ | (38.5 | ) | | $ | (11.5 | ) | | $ | 4.1 | | | $ | (45.9 | ) | Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | (12.1 | ) | | | (2.2 | ) | | | (5.9 | ) | | | (20.2 | ) | Amounts reclassified to consolidated statement of income(a) | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | Tax benefit (expense) | | 0.6 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 1.3 | | | | 2.4 | | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | (11.5 | ) | | | (1.7 | ) | | | (4.7 | ) | | | (17.9 | ) | Balance December 31, 2016 | $ | (50.0 | ) | | $ | (13.2 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (63.8 | ) |
(a) | Amounts classifiedreclassified to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses. |
16. Commitments, Contingencies
78
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and Guaranteesper share data)
14. | Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Commitments and Lease obligations a. Operating lease rent expense, included in income from operations, amounted to $20.9$18.8, $18.5 and $19.7 in 2013, $20.7 in 20122016, 2015 and $18.2 in 2011.2014, respectively. Beginning January 1, 2013, financing lease expense was recorded primarily for the Company’s Corporate Headquarters building. In 2013,2016, interest expense associated with this lease amounted to $4.2$4.0 and depreciation expense amounted to $2.5. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The Company is obligated to pay minimum annual rentals under different operating and financing lease agreements as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating
Leases | | | Financing
Leases | | | Total | | 2014 | | $ | 21.5 | | | $ | 5.7 | | | $ | 27.2 | | 2015 | | | 17.8 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 23.6 | | 2016 | | | 13.3 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 19.1 | | 2017 | | | 11.2 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 17.0 | | 2018 | | | 10.6 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 16.7 | | 2019 and thereafter | | | 30.7 | | | | 82.3 | | | | 113.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total future minimum lease commitments | | $ | 105.1 | | | $ | 111.5 | | | $ | 216.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating | | | Financing | | | | | | | | Leases | | | Leases | | | Total | | 2017 | | $ | 18.6 | | | $ | 5.7 | | | $ | 24.3 | | 2018 | | | 16.9 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 22.9 | | 2019 | | | 14.3 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 20.3 | | 2020 | | | 10.8 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 16.8 | | 2021 | | | 7.6 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 13.6 | | 2022 and thereafter | | | 13.4 | | | | 67.3 | | | | 80.7 | | Total future minimum lease commitments | | $ | 81.6 | | | $ | 97.0 | | | $ | 178.6 | |
b. In December 1981, theThe Company formedhas a partnership with a supplier of raw materials that mines and processes sodium-based mineral deposits. The Company purchases the majority of its sodium-based raw material requirements from the partnership. The partnership agreement for the partnership terminates upon two years’ written notice by either partner. Under the partnership agreement, the Company has an annual commitment to purchase 240,000 tons of sodium-based raw materials at the prevailing market price. TheWith the exception of the Natronx Technologies LLC (“Natronx”) joint venture, in which the Company and the partner supplier are each one-third owners, the Company is not engaged in any other material transactions with the partnership or the Company’s partner with the exception of the Natronx joint venture, in which the Company and its partner are each one-third owners.supplier. c. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had commitments to acquireof approximately $261.2$223.9. These commitments include the purchase of raw materials, packaging supplies and services from its vendors at market prices. These commitmentsprices to enable the Company to respond quickly to changes in customer orders or requirements.requirements, as well as costs associated with licensing and promotion agreements. d. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had the following guarantees; (i) $5.1 in outstandingvarious guarantees and letters of credit drawn on several banks which guarantee payment for such things as insurance claims in the event of the Company’s insolvency, (ii) an insolvency protection guarantee of approximately $19.4 to one of its United Kingdom pension plans effective January 1, 2011, and (iii) $3.3 worth of assets subject to guarantees for its Brazil operations for value added tax assessments and labor related cases currently under appeal.$21.2. e. On November 8, 2011, the Company acquired a license for certain oral care technology for cash consideration of $4.3. In addition to this initial payment, the Company iswas required to make advance royalty payments of up to $5.5 upon the launch of a product utilizing the licensed technology, of which approximately $3.0the entire $5.5 had been made as of December 31, 2013. The Company will make an2015. As of December 31, 2016, no additional $7payments are required under the license paymentagreement. However, upon the approval of certain New Drug Applications by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for products incorporating the acquired technology. Environmental matter
f. In 2000,technology, the Company acquired majority ownership in its Brazilian subsidiary, Quimica Geral Do Nordeste S.A. (“QGN”). The acquired operations included an inorganic salt manufacturing plant which began site operations in the late 1970’s. Located on the site were two closed landfills, two active landfills and a pond for the management of process waste streams. In 2009, QGN was advised by the environmental authority in the State of Bahia, the Institute of the Environment (“IMA”), that the plant was discharging contaminants into an adjacent creek. After learning of the discharge, QGN took immediate action to cease the discharge and retained two nationally recognized environmental firms to prepare a site investigation / remedial action (“SI/RA”) report.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
The SI/RA report was submitted by QGN to IMA in April 2010. The report concluded that the likely sources of the discharge were the failure of the pond and closed landfills. QGN ceased site operations in August 2010. In November 2010, IMA responded to QGN’s recommendation for an additional study by issuing a notification requiring a broad range of remediation measures (the “Remediation Notification”), which included the shutdown and removal of two on-site landfills. In addition, despite repeated discussions with IMA at QGN’s request to consider QGN’s proposed remediation alternatives, in December 2010, IMA imposed a fine of five million Brazilian Real (approximately U.S. $2.1 million at current exchange rates) for the discharge of contaminants above allowable limits. The description of the fine included a reference to aggravating factors that may indicate that local “management’s intent” was considered in determining the severity of the fine, which could result in criminal liability for members of local management. In January 2011, QGN filed with IMA an administrative defense to the fine, suspending any enforcement activities pending its defense. IMA has not yet formally responded to QGN’s administrative defense.
With respect to the Remediation Notification, QGN engaged in discussions with IMA during which QGN asserted that a number of the remediation measures, including the removal of the landfills, and the timeframes for implementation were not appropriate and requested that the Remediation Notification be withdrawn. In response, in February 2011, IMA issued a revised Remediation Notification (the “Revised Remediation Notification”) providing for further site analysis by QGN, including further study of the integrity of the landfills. The Revised Remediation Notification did not include a requirement to remove the landfills; however, it did not foreclose the possibility of such a requirement. QGN has responded to the Revised Remediation Notification providing further information regarding the remediation measures, and is in discussions with the Institute of Environment and Waste Management (“INEMA”), successor to IMA, to seek agreement on an appropriate remediation plan. In mid-2011, QGN, consistent with the Revised Remediation Notice, began an additional site investigation and capped the two active landfills. In 2012, QGN drained the waste pond. During the third quarter of 2013, INEMA approved, in writing, the first step in QGN’s proposed remediation plans, the installation of a trench drain to capture and treat groundwater at the site. QGN expects to begin construction of the trench drain in early 2014 and to continue discussions with INEMA concerning the resolution of the fine.
As a result of the foregoing events, the Company accrued approximately $3 million in 2009 and $4.8 million in 2010 for remediation, fines and related costs. Since 2009, the costs of remediation activities and foreign exchange rate changes have reduced the accrual by approximately $3.8 million, to a current amount of $4.0 million. As a result of INEMA’s approval of the first step in QGN’s remediation plans, the Company does not believe that it willwould be required to remove the landfills. However, it remains reasonably possible that INEMA will require such removal, and the Company could be unsuccessful in appealing such decision. The Company estimates the cost of such landfill removal would be in the range of $30 million to $50 million.make an additional $7.0 license payment.
Legal and tax proceedings g.f. The Company has been named as a defendant in a purported classbreach of contract action lawsuit alleging unfair, deceptive and unlawful business practices with respect to the advertising, marketing and sales of ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant. Specifically,filed by Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc. (the “Plaintiff”) on March 9, 2012, Plaintiffs Stephen Trewin and Joseph Farhatt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed a complaint against the CompanyApril 1, 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New Jersey alleging violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and breach of implied warranty.York.
The original complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company used a marketing(i) breached two agreements for the manufacture and advertising campaign that is centered aroundsupply of pregnancy and ovulation test kits by switching suppliers, (ii) failed to give Plaintiff the claim thatproper notice, (iii) failed to reimburse Plaintiff for costs and expenses under the ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant is a “natural” product that contains “natural” ingredientsagreements and provides “natural” protection.(iv) misrepresented its future requirements. The complaint allegesseeks compensatory and punitive damages in an amount in excess of $20.0, as well as declaratory relief, statutory prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company is vigorously defending itself in this matter. On June 16, 2014, the Company filed an amended answer to the complaint denying all of the Plaintiff’s material allegations. The parties have been engaged in fact and expert discovery, which is ongoing.79
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) advertising and marketing campaignIn connection with this matter, the Company has reserved an amount that it does not believe is false and misleading because the product contains artificial and synthetic ingredients. Among other things, the complaint seeks an order certifying the case as a class action, appointing Plaintiffs as class representatives and appointing Plaintiffs’ counsel to represent the class. The complaint also seeks restitution and disgorgement of all amounts obtainedmaterial. Although any damages ultimately paid by the Company as a result of the alleged misconduct, compensatory, actual, statutory and other unspecified damages allegedly suffered by Plaintiffs and the purported class, up to treble damages for alleged violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, punitive damages for alleged violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, an order requiring the Company to immediately cease its alleged wrongful conduct, an order enjoining the Company from continuing the conduct and acts identified in the complaint, an order requiring the Company to engage in a corrective notice campaign, an order requiring the Company to pay to Plaintiffs and all members of the purported class the amounts paid for ARM & HAMMER ESSENTIALS Natural Deodorant, statutory prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
On May 14, 2012, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint. On December 10, 2012, the Court issued an order granting the Company’s motion and dismissed the original complaint without prejudice. On January 7, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking relief similar to that sought in the original complaint, excluding the breach of implied warranty claim. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On September 30, 2013, the Court granted the Company’s motion with respect tonon-label-based advertising and marketing claims, but denied the Company’s motion with respect to thelabel-based claims.
In January 2014, the case was settled for an immaterialmay exceed this amount, and the settlement is subject to Court approval. If the Court fails to approve the settlement, the Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter. While it is not currently possible to estimate the amount of any damages or determine the impact ofsuch excess; however, any equitable relief that may be granted if the litigation continues and if there is an adverse outcome, such an outcomeexcess could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
h. The Company has recorded liabilities for uncertain income tax positions that, although supportable, may be challenged by tax authorities. The tax years 2010 and 2011 are currently under audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and several state taxing authorities.g. In addition, certain statutes of limitations are scheduled to expire in the near future. The Company does not anticipate that the settlement of audits and the expirations of statutes of limitations within the next twelve months will result in a significant change in unrecognized tax benefits.
i. In the second quarter of 2013, the Company and SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH (“SPD GmbH”) settled the litigation between them arising out of a complaint filed by SPD GmbH against the Company on January 22, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company’s motion to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey was granted in April 2009. On January 15, 2010, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory relief against SPD GmbH, also in the New Jersey District Court, and in response SPD GmbH filed counterclaims against the Company. Each party’s initial and subsequent claims against the other had been consolidated before that Court. SPD GmbH alleged that the Company used false and misleading advertising and competed unfairly with respect to its FIRST RESPONSE digital and analog home pregnancy and analog ovulation test kits in violation of the Lanham Act and related state laws. SPD GmbH’s allegations were principally directed to claims included in advertising to the effect that the Company’s digital FIRST RESPONSE pregnancy test kits can detect the pregnancy hormone five days before a woman’s missed menstrual period and that its analog FIRST RESPONSE Early Result Pregnancy Test detects the pregnancy hormone six days before a woman’s missed menstrual period. SPD GmbH sought an order to enjoin the Company from making such claims and to require the Company to remove all such advertising from
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
the marketplace, as well as unspecified damages, trebling of those damages, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Company denied all of SPD GmbH’s allegations and asserted claims against SPD GmbH of false and misleading advertising and unfair competition under the Lanham Act and related state laws with respect to certain of SPD GmbH’s advertising claims for its ClearBlue Easy home pregnancy test kit and ovulation detection products. In response, SPD GmbH denied all of the Company’s allegations and asserted counterclaims. On April 11, 2013, without any admission of wrongdoing by either party, the Company and SPD GmbH entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which all of the Company and SPD GmbH’s claims and counterclaims have been dismissed with prejudice and all other issues related to the litigation have been resolved. As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to provide to SPD GmbH a payment in an amount that is not material to the Company. The Company believes that its advertising practices in question in the litigation are and have been in full compliance with applicable law.
j. In conjunction with the Company’s acquisition and divestiture activities, the Company entered into select guarantees and indemnifications of performance with respect to the fulfillment of the Company’s commitments under applicable purchase and sale agreements. The arrangements generally indemnify the buyer or seller for damages associated with breach of contract, inaccuracies in representations and warranties surviving the closing date and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments retained under the applicable contract. Representations and warranties that survive the closing date generally survive for periods up to five years or the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations. Potential losses under the indemnifications are generally limited to a portion of the original transaction price, or to other lesser specific dollar amounts for select provisions. With respect to sale transactions, the Company also routinely enters into non-competition agreements for varying periods of time. Guarantees and indemnifications with respect to acquisition and divestiture activities, if triggered, could have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
k.h. The Company, in the ordinary course of its business is the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, government investigations and regulatory proceedings.proceedings from time to time, including, without limitation, those relating to, intellectual property, commercial transactions, product liability, purported consumer class actions, employment matters, antitrust, environmental, health, safety and other compliance related matters. Such proceedings are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of certain individual litigated matters and other proceedings, whether actualpending or threatened legal actions may not be reasonably predictable and any related damages or liability may not be estimable. Certain legal and regulatory proceedings,actions, including those described above, could result in an adverse outcome for the Company, and any such adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
17. Related Party Transactions
15. | Related Party Transactions |
The following summarizes the balances and transactions between the Company and each of (i) Armand and ArmaKleen, in which the Company holds a 50% ownership interest, and (ii) Natronx, in which the Company holds a one-third ownership interest: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Armand | | | ArmaKleen | | | Natronx | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | Purchases by Company | | $ | 22.5 | | | $ | 21.3 | | | $ | 19.6 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Sales by Company | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 5.5 | | | $ | 5.5 | | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 2.4 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Outstanding Accounts Receivable | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Outstanding Accounts Payable | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 2.3 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Administration & Management Oversight Services(1) | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 2.5 | | | $ | 1.1 | | | $ | 0.9 | | | $ | 0.7 | |
| Armand | | | ArmaKleen | | | Natronx | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Purchases by Company | $ | 20.9 | | | $ | 24.2 | | | $ | 26.4 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Sales by Company | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 2.0 | | Outstanding Accounts Receivable | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.6 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 0.6 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 0.1 | | Outstanding Accounts Payable | $ | 1.7 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | Administration & Management Oversight Services (1) | $ | 2.3 | | | $ | 2.3 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 2.0 | | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.8 | |
(1) | Billed by Company and recorded as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses. |
During 2015, the Company impaired its remaining investment in Natronx and recorded a $17.0 charge. This charge is primarily a result of lower than expected demand for the joint venture’s products as a result of a shift in the electric utility industry from coal-fired to natural gas-supplied power plants, continued delays in the implementation of updated federal regulations, and indirectly, the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling against the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) where the court stated that the EPA failed to properly consider the costs to implement the regulations. The Company believed that the foregoing factors would likely further delay the demand for these products. The Company assessed the value of the investment using both income and market based valuation methods. The charge was recorded in the Corporate segment in Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates. 80
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) The Company recorded a $3.2 million impairment charge associated with one of its affiliates in the second quarter of 2013. The charge, recorded in Equity in Earnings of Affiliates, is a result of the Company’s assessment of the financial impact from the delay in anticipated discounted cash flows from the affiliate.
18. Segments
Segment Information The Company operates three reportable segments: Consumer Domestic, Consumer International and SPD.Specialty Products Division. These segments are determined based on differences in the nature of products and organizational and ownership structures. The Company also has a Corporate segment. Segment revenues are derived from the sale of the following products: | | | Segment | | | Products | | Consumer Domestic | | Household and personal care products | | | Consumer International | | Primarily personal care products | | | SPD | | Specialty chemical products |
The Corporate segment income consists of equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates. As of December 31 2013,, 2016, the Company held 50% ownership interests in each of Armand and ArmaKleen, respectively, and a one-third ownership interest in Natronx. The Company’s equity in earnings (losses) of Armand and ArmaKleen for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx for the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 2013, 20122015 and 20112014 are included in the Corporate segment. Some of the subsidiaries that are included in the Consumer International segment manufacture and sell personal care products to the Consumer Domestic segment. These sales are eliminated from the Consumer International segment results set forth in the table below. 81
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) The following table presents selected financial information relating to the Company’s segments for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer
Domestic | | | Consumer
International | | | SPD | | | Corporate(1) | | | As Reported | | Net sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 2,413.5 | | | $ | 532.8 | | | $ | 248.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 3,194.3 | | 2012 | | | 2,156.9 | | | | 510.1 | | | | 254.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2,921.9 | | 2011 | | | 1,979.1 | | | | 509.1 | | | | 261.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2,749.3 | | | | | | | | Gross profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 1,163.0 | | | | 243.0 | | | | 63.3 | | | | (31.3 | ) | | | 1,438.0 | | 2012 | | | 1,015.9 | | | | 236.9 | | | | 68.0 | | | | (29.4 | ) | | | 1,291.4 | | 2011 | | | 936.9 | | | | 238.7 | | | | 64.2 | | | | (25.3 | ) | | | 1,214.5 | | | | | | | | Marketing Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 320.5 | | | | 76.6 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 399.8 | | 2012 | | | 280.3 | | | | 74.5 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 357.3 | | 2011 | | | 274.9 | | | | 75.9 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 354.1 | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)2016:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consumer
Domestic | | | Consumer
International | | | SPD | | | Corporate(1) | | | As Reported | | | | | | | | Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 318.6 | | | | 98.8 | | | | 29.9 | | | | (31.3 | ) | | | 416.0 | | 2012 | | | 297.6 | | | | 89.8 | | | | 31.0 | | | | (29.4 | ) | | | 389.0 | | 2011 | | | 269.5 | | | | 92.8 | | | | 30.8 | | | | (25.3 | ) | | | 367.8 | | | | | | | | Income from Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 524.0 | | | | 67.4 | | | | 30.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 622.2 | | 2012 | | | 438.0 | | | | 72.6 | | | | 34.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 545.1 | | 2011 | | | 392.5 | | | | 70.0 | | | | 30.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 492.6 | | | | | | | | Equity in Earnings of Affiliates | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.8 | | 2012 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 8.9 | | | | 8.9 | | 2011 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 10.0 | | | | | | | | Interest Expense(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 23.4 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 1.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 27.7 | | 2012 | | | 11.2 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 14.0 | | 2011 | | | 7.0 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 8.7 | | | | | | | | Investment Earnings(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 2.2 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 2.6 | | 2012 | | | 1.4 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.7 | | 2011 | | | 1.5 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 1.9 | | | | | | | | Other Income, net(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | (1.8 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (2.1 | ) | 2012 | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.8 | | 2011 | | | (1.0 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | | | | | Income Before Income Taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 501.0 | | | | 64.5 | | | | 29.5 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 597.8 | | 2012 | | | 428.8 | | | | 71.0 | | | | 33.8 | | | | 8.9 | | | | 542.5 | | 2011 | | | 386.0 | | | | 68.9 | | | | 29.7 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 494.6 | | | | | | | | Identifiable Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 3,407.4 | | | | 602.5 | | | | 140.6 | | | | 109.2 | | | | 4,259.7 | | 2012 | | | 3,317.5 | | | | 543.8 | | | | 135.1 | | | | 101.7 | | | | 4,098.1 | | 2011 | | | 2,437.9 | | | | 476.5 | | | | 132.2 | | | | 71.0 | | | | 3,117.6 | | | | | | | | Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 53.6 | | | | 10.3 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 67.1 | | 2012 | | | 58.9 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 5.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 74.5 | | 2011 | | | 57.4 | | | | 12.2 | | | | 7.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 76.6 | | | | | | | | Depreciation & Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | | 77.3 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 90.5 | | 2012 | | | 70.5 | | | | 7.9 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 85.0 | | 2011 | | | 61.4 | | | | 8.1 | | | | 5.7 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 77.1 | |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
| | Consumer | | | Consumer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic | | | International | | | SPD | | | Corporate(1) | | | As Reported | | Net sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | $ | 2,677.8 | | | $ | 525.2 | | | $ | 290.1 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 3,493.1 | | 2015 | | | 2,581.6 | | | | 501.0 | | | | 312.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 3,394.8 | | 2014 | | | 2,471.6 | | | | 535.2 | | | | 290.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 3,297.6 | | Gross profit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 1,308.8 | | | | 235.4 | | | | 83.0 | | | | (36.6 | ) | | | 1,590.6 | | 2015 | | | 1,215.7 | | | | 226.8 | | | | 101.9 | | | | (32.6 | ) | | | 1,511.8 | | 2014 | | | 1,160.9 | | | | 242.1 | | | | 76.6 | | | | (26.7 | ) | | | 1,452.9 | | Marketing Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 345.2 | | | | 78.2 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 427.2 | | 2015 | | | 336.5 | | | | 76.6 | | | | 4.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 417.5 | | 2014 | | | 333.2 | | | | 80.5 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 416.9 | | Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 350.7 | | | | 89.0 | | | | 36.1 | | | | (36.6 | ) | | | 439.2 | | 2015 | | | 326.2 | | | | 93.3 | | | | 33.2 | | | | (32.6 | ) | | | 420.1 | | 2014 | | | 302.0 | | | | 93.9 | | | | 25.6 | | | | (26.7 | ) | | | 394.8 | | Income from Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 612.9 | | | | 68.2 | | | | 43.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 724.2 | | 2015 | | | 553.0 | | | | 56.9 | | | | 64.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 674.2 | | 2014 | | | 525.7 | | | | 67.6 | | | | 47.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 641.2 | | Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 9.2 | | | | 9.2 | | 2015 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (5.8 | ) | | | (5.8 | ) | 2014 | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 11.6 | | | | 11.6 | | Income Before Income Taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 590.6 | | | | 66.3 | | | | 39.8 | | | | 9.2 | | | | 705.9 | | 2015 | | | 529.4 | | | | 54.5 | | | | 57.3 | | | | (5.8 | ) | | | 635.4 | | 2014 | | | 502.8 | | | | 64.7 | | | | 45.8 | | | | 11.6 | | | | 624.9 | | Identifiable Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 3,374.4 | | | | 714.5 | | | | 181.3 | | | | 83.9 | | | | 4,354.1 | | 2015 | | | 3,449.9 | | | | 521.0 | | | | 206.5 | | | | 79.5 | | | | 4,256.9 | | 2014 | | | 3,502.9 | | | | 619.8 | | | | 135.1 | | | | 101.4 | | | | 4,359.2 | | Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 34.9 | | | | 8.8 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 49.8 | | 2015 | | | 51.5 | | | | 7.2 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 61.8 | | 2014 | | | 59.2 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 70.5 | | Depreciation & Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | | 87.8 | | | | 9.5 | | | | 8.6 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 107.6 | | 2015 | | | 82.6 | | | | 7.9 | | | | 8.5 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 101.0 | | 2014 | | | 76.7 | | | | 7.6 | | | | 5.2 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 91.2 | |
(1) | The Corporate segment reflects the following: |
|
(A) | The administrative costs of the production planning and logistics functions are included in segment Selling, General and Administrative expenses but are elements of Cost of Sales in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Such amounts were $31.3, $29.4,$36.6, $32.6, and $25.3$26.7 for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. |
|
(B) | Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates from Armand Armakleen and Natronx. |
| ArmaKleen for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Armand, ArmaKleen and Natronx for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
(C) | Corporate assets include notes receivable, domestic deferred income taxes, deferred compensation investments and the Company’sCompany's investment in unconsolidated affiliates. |
(2) | In determining Income before Income Taxes, interest expense, investment earnings, and other income, net, were allocated to the segments based upon each segment’s relative Income from Operations. |
82
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) (In millions, except share and per share data) Other than the differences noted in footnote(1) and(2) above, the accounting policies followed by each of the segments, including intersegment transactions, are substantially consistent with the accounting policies described in Note 1. Intersegment sales from Consumer International to Consumer Domestic, which are not reflected in the table above, were $2.2, $3.4, $5.3 and $5.2$1.9 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 20122015 and December 31, 2011,2014, respectively. Product line revenues from external customers for each of the three years ended December 31, 2013,2016, December 31, 20122015 and December 31, 20112014 were as follows: | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | Household Products | | $ | 1,436.1 | | | $ | 1,411.3 | | | $ | 1,295.0 | | | $ | 1,593.4 | | | $ | 1,544.3 | | | $ | 1,466.2 | | Personal Care Products | | | 977.4 | | | | 745.6 | | | | 684.1 | | | | 1,084.4 | | | | 1,037.3 | | | | 1,005.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Consumer Domestic | | | 2,413.5 | | | | 2,156.9 | | | | 1,979.1 | | | | 2,677.8 | | | | 2,581.6 | | | | 2,471.6 | | Total Consumer International | | | 532.8 | | | | 510.1 | | | | 509.1 | | | | 525.2 | | | | 501.0 | | | | 535.2 | | Total SPD | | | 248.0 | | | | 254.9 | | | | 261.1 | | | | 290.1 | | | | 312.2 | | | | 290.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Consolidated Net Sales | | $ | 3,194.3 | | | $ | 2,921.9 | | | $ | 2,749.3 | | | $ | 3,493.1 | | | $ | 3,394.8 | | | $ | 3,297.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Household Products include laundry, deodorizing, cleaning and laundrycleaning products. Personal Care Products include condoms, pregnancy kits, oral care products, skin care products, hair care products and vitamin and mineralgummy dietary supplements. Geographic Information Approximately 80%84%, 79%83% and 79%81% of the net sales reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, were to customers in the U.S. Approximately 97%98%, 97%96% and 96% of long-lived assets were located in the U.S. at December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Other than the U.S., no one country accounts for more than 7%5% of consolidated net sales and 5% of total assets. Customers A group of three customers accounted for approximately 35%, 34%35% and 33%36% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, of which a single customer (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates) accounted for approximately 24%, 24% and 23%25% in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. 17.Brazil’s Chemical Business During fourth quarter of 2016, the Company decided to sell its Brazilian chemical business to focus on its Brazilian consumer business, resulting in a plant impairment charge of $4.9 recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016 based upon an anticipated selling price. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company signed an agreement to sell the business, resulting in an approximate $5.0 expense for severance and other charges. Sales for the Brazilian chemical business in 2016 were approximately $22.0. The Company anticipates the transaction to close during the first quarter. 18.Subsequent Event Viviscal Acquisition On January 17, 2017, the Company acquired the VIVISCAL business (“the Viviscal Acquisition”) from Lifes2Good Holdings Limited for approximately $160.0. Viviscal is the number one hair care supplement brand both in the U.S. and the United Kingdom with global annual sales of $44.0 in 2016. This brand is complementary to the Company’s global BATISTE dry shampoo and TOPPIK hair care business. The acquisition was funded with short-term borrowings and will be managed in the Consumer Domestic and Consumer International segments. 83
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—STATEMENTS – (Continued) (Dollars inIn millions, except share and per share data) 19. Subsequent Events
Share Repurchase Authorization
On January 29, 2014, the Board authorized a share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $500 million of Common Stock. This share repurchase program replaces the Company’s share repurchase program previously announced on November 5, 2012. In 2013, the Company purchased 0.9 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $50 million under the previous share purchase authorization, which is now terminated. In addition, the Board authorized a new evergreen share repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, the Common Stock to reduce or eliminate dilution associated with issuances of Common Stock under the Company’s incentive plans.
As part of the share repurchase programs, in February 2014, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) contract with a commercial bank to purchase $140 million of the Company’s common stock. The Company paid $140 million to the bank, inclusive of fees, and received an initial delivery of approximately 2 million shares, which reduced the Company’s shares outstanding. The Company used cash on hand to fund the initial purchase price. The total amount of shares to be ultimately delivered by the bank will be determined by the average price per share paid by the bank during the purchase period, which is expected to end in mid-May 2014.
As of the filing of this Annual Report, the Company has made no purchases in 2014 other than those pursuant to the ASR described above.
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)
19.Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information The unaudited quarterly results of operations are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. Adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature, except as discussed in the accompanying notes. Due to rounding differences, the sum of the quarterly amounts may not add precisely to the annual amounts. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | First
Quarter | | | Second
Quarter | | | Third
Quarter | | | Fourth
Quarter | | | Full Year | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 779.3 | | | $ | 787.6 | | | $ | 804.8 | | | $ | 822.6 | | | $ | 3,194.3 | | Gross Profit | | | 350.1 | | | | 351.0 | | | | 365.2 | | | | 371.7 | | | | 1,438.0 | | Income from Operations(1) | | | 169.3 | | | | 140.5 | | | | 167.8 | | | | 144.6 | | | | 622.2 | | Equity in Earnings of Affiliates | | | 0.6 | | | | (1.1 | ) | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.4 | | | | 2.8 | | Net Income | | | 107.7 | | | | 86.6 | | | | 107.9 | | | | 92.2 | | | | 394.4 | | Net Income per Share-Basic | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.62 | | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 2.85 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted | | $ | 0.76 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | $ | 0.76 | | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 2.79 | | | | | | | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales(2) | | $ | 690.6 | | | $ | 696.4 | | | $ | 725.2 | | | $ | 809.7 | | | $ | 2,921.9 | | Gross Profit | | | 302.5 | | | | 303.0 | | | | 327.5 | | | | 358.4 | | | | 1,291.4 | | Income from Operations | | | 142.7 | | | | 122.4 | | | | 145.4 | | | | 134.6 | | | | 545.1 | | Equity in Earnings of Affiliates | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 8.9 | | Net Income | | | 95.8 | | | | 79.3 | | | | 93.9 | | | | 80.8 | | | | 349.8 | | Net Income per Share-Basic | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | 2.50 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 2.45 | | | | | | | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 642.3 | | | $ | 674.9 | | | $ | 701.0 | | | $ | 731.1 | | | $ | 2,749.3 | | Gross Profit | | | 288.1 | | | | 300.0 | | | | 309.9 | | | | 316.5 | | | | 1,214.5 | | Income from Operations | | | 131.1 | | | | 117.8 | | | | 126.3 | | | | 117.4 | | | | 492.6 | | Equity in Earnings of Affiliates | | | 2.2 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 10.0 | | Net Income(3) | | | 83.6 | | | | 82.6 | | | | 79.6 | | | | 63.8 | | | | 309.6 | | Net Income per Share-Basic(3) | | $ | 0.59 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 2.16 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted(3) | | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.54 | | | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 2.12 | |
| | First | | | Second | | | Third | | | Fourth | | | Full | | | | Quarter | | | Quarter | | | Quarter | | | Quarter | | | Year | | 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 849.0 | | | $ | 877.4 | | | $ | 870.7 | | | $ | 896.0 | | | $ | 3,493.1 | | Gross Profit | | | 379.0 | | | | 408.0 | | | | 395.6 | | | | 408.0 | | | | 1,590.6 | | Income from Operations | | | 179.5 | | | | 175.3 | | | | 196.0 | | | | 173.4 | | | | 724.2 | | Net Income | | | 113.0 | | | | 111.6 | | | | 124.0 | | | | 110.4 | | | | 459.0 | | Net Income per Share-Basic | | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 1.78 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 0.47 | | | $ | 0.42 | | | $ | 1.75 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net Sales | | $ | 812.3 | | | $ | 847.1 | | | $ | 861.8 | | | $ | 873.6 | | | $ | 3,394.8 | | Gross Profit | | | 355.5 | | | | 373.1 | | | | 385.8 | | | | 397.4 | | | | 1,511.8 | | Income from Operations | | | 172.1 | | | | 142.3 | | | | 190.6 | | | | 169.2 | | | | 674.2 | | Net Income (1) | | | 107.2 | | | | 73.7 | | | | 120.4 | | | | 109.1 | | | | 410.4 | | Net Income per Share-Basic (1) (2) | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.42 | | | $ | 1.57 | | Net Income per Share-Diluted (1) (2) | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 1.54 | |
(1) | The fourthsecond quarter of 20132015 Net Income includes a $17.0 or $0.06 per share impairment charge to write-off the remaining investment in Natronx. |
(2) | The second quarter of 2015 Income from Operations includes approximately $6.5 of trade name impairment charges.an $8.9 pre-tax charge or $0.03 per share to terminate an international defined benefit pension plan. |
(2) | The fourth quarter of 2012 Net Sales includes approximately $70 associated with the acquisition of the L’IL CRITTERS and VITAFUSION gummy vitamin dietary supplement business.
|
(3) | The fourth quarter of 2011 Net Income and Net Income per Share includes a deferred tax valuation charge of approximately $13 (or $0.09 per share) and includes an additional month’s results of three foreign subsidiaries due to the change in the fiscal calendar. The change increased net sales by $14.3, but had a nominal effect on net income. |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURENot applicable. ITEMITEM 9A.
| CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) at the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act are (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the disclosure. b)Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Company’s management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report and is incorporated by reference herein. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report. c)Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. ITEMITEM 9B.
| OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
PARTPART III
ITEMITEM 10.
| DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance—Governance and Other Board Matters – Code of Conduct,” and “Corporate Governance—Governance and Other Board Matters– Board of Directors Meetings and Board Committees—Committees – Audit Committee,” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. ITEMITEM 11.
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2013“2016 Summary Compensation Table,” “2013“2016 Grants of Plan Based Awards,” “2013“2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End,” “2013“2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “2013“2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” and “Compensation & Organization Committee Report” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. ITEMITEM 12.
| SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2013”2016” and “Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. ITEMITEM 13.
| CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Corporate Governance—Governance and other Board Matters – Board of Directors Independence” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. ITEMITEM 14.
| PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
PARTPART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) 1.Financial Statements and Schedule The following Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K: (a) 3.Exhibits Unless otherwise noted, the file number for all Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission referenced below is 1-10585. | | (3.1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3.1) | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2009. | | | | | | | (3.2) | | (3.2) | | By-laws of the Company, amended and restated as of February 1, 2012,January 27, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2012.2, 2016. | | | | | | | (4.1) | | (4.1) | | Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2010, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010. | | | | | | | | | (4.2) | | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2010, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to the 3.35% senior notes2.875% Notes due 2015 (including form of note),2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2010. | | | | | | | (4.2) | | (4.3) | | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2012, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to the 2.875% Notes due 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2012. | | | | | | | (4.3) | Indenture, dated as of December 9, 2014, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2014. | | (10.1) | | | | | (4.4) | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 9, 2014, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2.450% Notes due 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 9, 2014. | | | | | | | (10.1) | Credit Agreement dated November 18, 2010,December 4, 2015, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., the initial lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, PNCswing line lender, and L/C issuer, SunTrust Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as syndication agent,agents and swing line lenders, Bank of Montreal, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch,Securities Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, The Bank of Nova Scotia and UnionThe Bank N.A.of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD., as co-documentation agents,Documentation Agents, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2010.December 7, 2015. | | | | | • | | (10.2) | | (10.1.1) | | Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, HSBC Bank USA, National Association and Union Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (10.2) | | Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated October 3, 2011,February 23, 2017, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Dealer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.Dealer. | | | | | • | | (10.3) | Form of Amended and Restated Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated February 23, 2017, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Dealer. | | (10.3) | | | | | (10.4) | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Avid Health, Inc., the Seller Representative and the sellers party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2012. | | | | | | * | *(10.5) | | (10.4) | | Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June 1, 1997, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. |
| | | | | * | (10.5.1) | | | | * | | (10.4.1) | | Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | * | *(10.5.2) | | (10.4.2) | | Amendment to the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective February 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | * | *(10.6) | | (10.5) | | Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan II, amended and restated as of January 1, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | * | *(10.7) | | (10.6) | | Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors effective as of May 1, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2008. | | | | | | * | *(10.8) | | (10.7) | | Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for Directors, effective January 1, 2012,2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.810.7 to the Company’s quarterlyannual report on Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 2012.2015. | | | | | | * | *(10.9) | | (10.8) | | The Stock Option Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 1991, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. | | | | | | * | *(10.10) | | (10.9) | | The Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Stock Award Plan as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2007. | | | | | | * | *(10.11) | | (10.10) | | Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed on March 21, 2013. | | | | | | * | *(10.12) | | (10.11) | | Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Annual Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed on March 23, 2012. | | | | | | * | *(10.13) | | (10.12) | | Employment Agreement, dated June 11, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and James R. Craigie incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. | | | | | | | * | | (10.13) | | Employment Agreement, dated October 31, 2011, by and between the Company and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | * | *(10.14) | | (10.14) | | Employment Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, by and between the Company and Matthew T. Farrell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2006. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | * | *(10.15) | | (10.15) | | Employment Agreement, dated July 16, 2004, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Louis H. Tursi, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. | | | | | | * | *(10.16) | | (10.16) | | Form ofAmended and Restated Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated March 12, 2010,entered into by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc.the Company and each of the Company’s executive officers, with the exception of James R. Craigie and Patrick de Maynadier,Matthew T. Farrell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w)10.1 to the Company’s annualcurrent report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.8-K filed on February 2, 2016. | | | | | | * | *(10.17) | | (10.17) | | Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control and Severance Agreement dated March 12, 2010,entered into by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc.the Company and James R. Craigie,each of the senior executive officers (other than Matthew T. Farrell), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x)10.2 to the Company’s annualcurrent report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.8-K filed on February 2, 2016. | | | | | | | *(10.18) | | (10.18) | | Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated December 31, 2011, by and between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Patrick de Maynadier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | | | | | | | * | | (10.19) | | Lease Agreement (Build to Suit), dated July 20, 2011, between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and CD 95 L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. | | | | | • | | (12) | | (12) | | Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges. | | | | | • | | (21) | | (21) | | List of the Company’s subsidiaries. | | | | | • | | (23.1) | | (23.1) | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | | | | | • | | (31.1) | | (31.1) | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. | | | | | • | | (31.2) | | (31.2) | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. | | | | |
• | | (32.1) | | (32.1) | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | | | | | • | | (32.2) | | (32.2) | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | | | | | | | (101) | | (101) | | The following materials from Church & Dwight Co., Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | | | | |
___________ Indicates documents filed herewith. * | Constitutes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report. |
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY None.
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 21, 2014.24, 2017. | | | CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. | | | | | By:
| By: |
| /s/ JAMES R. CRAIGIE Matthew T. Farrell | | | JAMES R. CRAIGIE | MATTHEW T. FARRELL | | | CHAIRMAN | PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ T. Rosie Albright | | Director | | | | | February 24, 2017 | /S/ T. ROSIE ALBRIGHT
T. Rosie Albright | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | |
| | | | | /S/ JAMES R. CRAIGIE s/ James R. Craigie | | Chairman | | February 24, 2017 | James R. Craigie | | | | | | | | | | /s/ Matthew T. Farrell | | President and Chief Executive Officer, Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | /S/ ROSINA B. DIXON
Rosina B. DixonMatthew T. Farrell
| | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | |
| | | | | /S/ BRADLEY C. IRWIN s/ Bradley C. Irwin | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | Bradley C. Irwin | | | | | | | | | | /S/ ROBERT D. LEBLANC s/ Robert D. LeBlanc | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | Robert D. LeBlanc | | | | | | | | | | /S/ PENRY W. PRICE s/ Penry W. Price | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | Penry W. Price | | | | | | | | | | /S/ RAVICHANDRA K. SALIGRAM s/ Ravichandra K. Saligram | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | /S/ ROBERTRavichandra K. SHEARER Saligram
| | | | | | | | | | /s/ Robert K. Shearer | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | Robert K. Shearer | | | | | | | | | | /Ss/ Janet S. Vergis | | Director | | February 24, 2017 | Janet S. Vergis | | | | | | | | | | / ARTHUR B. WINKLEBLACK s/ Arthur B. Winkleblack | | Director | | February 21, 2014 | | | 24, 2017 | /S/ MATTHEW T. FARRELL
Matthew T. FarrellArthur B. Winkleblack
| | | | | | | | | | /s/ Richard A. Dierker | | Executive Vice President | | February 24, 2017 | Richard A. Dierker | | and Chief Financial Officer | | | | | (Principal Financial Officer) | | February 21, 2014 | | | |
| | | | | /S/ STEVEN J. KATZ s/ Steven J. Katz | | Vice President and Controller (Principal | | February 24, 2017 | Steven J. Katz | | (Principal Accounting Officer) | | February 21, 2014 |
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE II—II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016 (Dollars in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additions | | | Deductions | | | | | | | | | | | Beginning
Balance | | | Charged to
Expenses | | | Acquired | | | Amounts
Written Off | | | Foreign
Exchange | | | Ending
Balance | | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 0.8 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.8 | | 2012 | | | 1.8 | | | | (0.7 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.8 | | 2011 | | | 5.5 | | | | (0.6 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 1.8 | | | | | | | | | Allowance for Cash Discounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 65.2 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (65.1 | ) | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 5.1 | | 2012 | | | 4.0 | | | | 57.7 | | | | 0.7 | | | | (57.4 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 4.9 | | 2011 | | | 4.3 | | | | 52.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (53.3 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | 4.0 | | | | | | | | | Sales Returns and Allowances | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2013 | | $ | 17.5 | | | $ | 49.5 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (55.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 11.6 | | 2012 | | | 10.1 | | | | 51.7 | | | | 0.7 | | | | (44.9 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 17.5 | | 2011 | | | 9.7 | | | | 40.1 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (39.7 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 10.1 | |
| | | | | | Additions | | | Deductions | | | | | | | | | | | | Beginning | | | Charged to | | | | | | | Amounts | | | Foreign | | | Ending | | | | Balance | | | Expenses | | | Acquired | | | Written Off | | | Exchange | | | Balance | | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | $ | 1.0 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | 0.1 | | | $ | 2.1 | | 2015 | | | 1.9 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (1.0 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 1.0 | | 2014 | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 1.9 | | Allowance for Cash Discounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | $ | 4.6 | | | $ | 69.8 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (69.8 | ) | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 4.6 | | 2015 | | | 5.2 | | | | 68.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (69.2 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 4.6 | | 2014 | | | 5.1 | | | | 66.9 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (67.0 | ) | | | 0.2 | | | | 5.2 | | Sales Returns and Allowances | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2016 | | $ | 11.9 | | | $ | 56.7 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | (56.8 | ) | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 12.1 | | 2015 | | | 11.9 | | | | 67.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (67.4 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 11.9 | | 2014 | | | 11.6 | | | | 58.6 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (58.1 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 11.9 | |
92 |
|
|