SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
________________________________________________________
(MARK ONE)
|
| |
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132014
|
| |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROMTO COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-26058
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| FLORIDA | | 59-3264661 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
|
| | |
| 1001 EAST PALM AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA | | 33605 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (813) 552-5000
_______________________________________________________
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
| | |
TITLE OF EACH CLASS | | NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED |
| None | | None |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | x |
| Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.): Yes ¨ No x The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June
28, 2013,30, 2014, was approximately
$382,638,228.$583,008,954. For purposes of this determination, common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 24,
20142015 was
33,888,957.29,515,188.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
|
| | |
Document | | Parts Into Which
Incorporated |
Portions of Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held April 10, 201421, 2015 (“Proxy Statement”) | | Part III |
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
20132014
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
References in this document to “the Registrant,” “Kforce,” “we,” “the Firm,” “our” or “us” refer to Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires or indicates.
This report, particularly Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), and the documents we incorporate into this report, contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are made in reliance upon the protections provided by such acts for forward-looking statements. Such statements may include, but may not be limited to, projections of revenue, income, losses, cash flows, capital expenditures, future prospects,
our beliefs regarding potential government actions, anticipated costs and benefits of proposed (or future) acquisitions, integration of acquisitions,
transition of divestitures, the efficacy of our disclosure and internal controls, plans for future operations, capabilities of business operations, effects of interest rate variations, our ability to obtain financing and favorable terms, financing needs or plans, plans relating to services of Kforce, estimates concerning the effects of litigation or other disputes, estimates concerning our ability to collect on our accounts receivable, expectations of the overall economic outlook,
the effects of organizational realignment, developments within the staffing sector including, but not limited to, the penetration rate
(the percentage of temporary staffing to total employment) and growth in temporary staffing,
our ability to recruit qualified individuals, estimates concerning goodwill impairment, as well as assumptions as to any of the foregoing and all statements that are not based on historical fact but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. For a further list and description of various risks, relevant factors and uncertainties that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors and MD&A sections. In addition, when used in this discussion, the terms “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “may,”
“could,” “should”
, “could” and variations thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in or underlying the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report. Kforce undertakes no obligation to publicly publish the results of any adjustments to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events on or after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unexpected events.
Item 1. Business.
We are a provider of professional and technical specialty staffing services and solutions and operate through our corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, 62 field offices located throughout the United States and one office in Manila, Philippines. Kforce was incorporated in 1994 but its predecessor companies, Romac & Associates, Inc. and Source Services Corporation have been providing staffing services since 1962. Kforce completed its Initial Public Offering in August 1995.
We provide our clients staffing services and solutions through
fourthree operating segments: Technology (“Tech”), Finance and Accounting (“FA”
), Health Information Management (“HIM”) and Government Solutions (“GS”). Our Tech segment includes the results of Kforce Global Solutions, Inc. (“Global”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which has an office in the Philippines.
HIM andThe GS
segments aresegment is organized and managed by specialty because of the unique operating characteristics of
eachthe business.
The following charts depict the percentage of our total revenues for each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (the charts for 2013 and 2011:
2012 have been reconfigured to exclude our former Health Information Management ("HIM") segment which we sold in 2014):
Our Tech segment provides both temporary staffing and permanent placement services to our clients, focusing primarily on areas of information technology such as systems/applications programmers and developers, senior-level project managers, systems analysts, enterprise data management and e-business and networking technicians. The average bill rate for our Tech segment for
20132014 was approximately
$65$68 per hour. Our Tech segment provides service to clients in a variety of industries with a strong footprint in
the healthcare, financial services and government
integrators. A recent reportsectors. An IT growth update published by Staffing Industry Analysts (“SIA”)
provides an expectationduring September 2014, states that temporary technology staffing
couldis projected to experience growth of 7% in
2014.2015. We believe the
continuedsustained high growth is due to the continuing use of temporary staffing as a solution during uncertain economic cycles, the increasing cost of employment driving the systemic use of temporary staffing, particularly in project-based work such as technology, and an increasing influence of technology in business driving
up the overall demand for
Tech talent.talent in the temporary technology staffing sector. The SIA
report also acknowledges that notable skill shortages in certain technology skill sets will continue, which we believe will result in strong future growth in our Tech segment.
Our FA segment provides both temporary staffing and permanent placement services to our clients in areas such as general accounting, business analysis, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial analysis and reporting, taxation, budget preparation and analysis, mortgage and loan processing, cost analysis, professional
administrative,administration, credit and collections, audit services, and systems and controls analysis and documentation. Our FA segment provides service to clients in a variety of industries with a strong footprint in
the healthcare, financial services
organizations and government
integrators.sectors. The average bill rate for our FA segment for
20132014 was approximately $32 per hour.
A recentIn its September 2014 update, the SIA report
published by SIA indicated that the market for temporary finance/accounting work is expected to expand 5% during
2014.HIM
Our HIM segment provides temporary staffing services to our clients, which primarily consist2015.
Our GS segment provides Tech and FA professionals to the Federal Government as both a prime
contractor and a subcontractor. The GS contracts are concentrated on customers that
we believe are less impacted by sequestration threats, such as healthcare. GS offers integrated business solutions to its customers in areas such as: information technology, healthcare informatics, data and knowledge management, research and development, financial management and accounting, among other areas. Substantially all GS services are supplied to the Federal Government through field offices located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, San Antonio, Texas and Austin, Texas.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce management made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services. As a result of this change in focus, management plans to reallocate existing investments in the business and redirect the business development team to concentrate on a more specific and, in our opinion, a higher quality revenue stream. These plans will ultimately result in the transition away from certain existing revenue streams, specific revenue-generating contracts and opportunities in the business development life cycle that do not fit within the revised strategic scope of service offerings, including pure staff augmentation as well as product sales. The change in strategy, coupled with the lengthy contract procurement cycle within the government sector of approximately 18 months for solution-based services, is expected to have a negative impact on near-term growth prospects of the GS segment and, as a result, we believe GS will experience a moderate reduction in revenues and profitability over the next few years.
Types of Staffing Services
Kforce’s staffing services consist of temporary staffing services (“Flex”) and permanent placement services (“Search”). For the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2013,
and 2012,
Flex represented 96.2%, 95.5% and
2011, Search represented 4.2%, 4.4% and 4.3%95.3% of total Kforce revenue, respectively.
We target clients and recruits for both Flex
and Search services, which contributes to our objective of providing integrated solutions for all of our clients’ human capital needs.
Flex
We provide our clients with qualified individuals (“consultants”) on a temporary basis when it is determined that they have the appropriate skills and experience and are “the right match” for our clients. We recruit consultants from the job boards,
from our associates’ networks,Kforce.com, from social media networks and from passive candidates we identify who are currently employed and not actively seeking another position. Our success is dependent upon our employees’ (“associates”) ability to: (1) understand and acknowledge our clients’ needs; (2) determine and understand the capabilities of the consultants being recruited; and (3) deliver and manage the client-consultant relationship to the satisfaction of both our clients and our consultants. We believe proper execution by our associates and our consultants directly impacts the longevity of the assignments, increases the likelihood of being able to generate repeat business with our clients and fosters a better experience for our consultants, which has a direct correlation to their redeployment.
Flex revenue is driven by the number of total hours billed and established bill rates. Flex gross profit is determined by deducting consultant pay, benefits and other related costs from Flex revenues. Flex associate commissions, related taxes and other compensation and benefits, as well as field management compensation are included in
Selling, Generalselling, general and
Administrativeadministrative expenses (“SG&A”), along with administrative and corporate compensation. The Flex business model involves attempting to maximize the number of consultant hours and bill rates, while managing consultant pay rates and benefit costs, as well as compensation and benefits for our core associates. Flex revenue also includes solutions provided through our GS segment. These revenues involve providing longer-term contract services to the customer primarily on a time-and-materials basis but also on a fixed-price and cost-plus basis.
Our Search business is a significantly smaller, yet important, part of our business that involves locating qualified individuals (“candidates”) for permanent placement with our clients. We primarily perform these searches on a contingency basis; thus, fees are only earned if the candidates are ultimately hired by our clients. The typical structure for search fees is based upon a percentage of the placed individual’s annual compensation in their first year of employment, which is known at the time of placement. We recruit permanent employees from the job boards, from our associates’ networks, social media networks and from passive candidates we identify who are currently employed and not actively seeking another position. Also, there are occasions where consultants are initially assigned to a client on a Flex basis and later are converted to a permanent placement, for which we may also receive a Search fee (referred to as “conversion revenue”).
We target clients and recruits for both Flex and Search services, which contributes to our objective of providing integrated solutions for all of our clients’ human capital needs.Search revenues are driven by placements made and the resulting fees billed and are recognized net of an allowance for “fallouts,” which occur when placements do not complete the applicable contingency period. Although the contingency period varies by contract, it is typically 90 days or less. This allowance for fallouts is estimated based upon historical experience with Search placements that did not complete the contingency period. There are no consultant payroll costs associated with Search placements, thus, all Search revenues increase gross profit by the full amount of the fee. Search associate commissions, compensation and benefits are included in SG&A.
Business Strategy
The key elements
Our primary goal is to sustain long-term financial growth and outperform the industry while being a leading provider of domestic professional and staffing services in our focus segments. We believe the following strategies will help us achieve our goal.
Invest in Headcount of Revenue Generators. Given the current and expected future demand in the marketplace for the services provided by Kforce and the performance of our most tenured associates continuing to remain near peak levels, the Firm made significant investments beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012 in the hiring of associates that are responsible for generating revenue. The increase in revenue generator headcount from 2013 to 2014 was 6.3% and from 2012 to 2013 was 10.3%. New associates typically take six to twelve months to ramp up to a minimum acceptable standard and continue to ramp for up to four years. Accordingly, we expect that the investment in 2014 will result in more revenue growth during 2015 and beyond. Going forward, the Firm expects to continue to hire additional revenue generators in those lines of business, strategy includegeographies and industries that we believe present the following:greatest opportunity.
Enhanced Customer Focus. During 2013, Kforce streamlined the Firm’s leadership and revenue enablers in an effort to align a higher percentage of roles closer to the customer, supporting our significant focus to provide more consistent and effective service to our clients and our consultants. The new alignment has resulted in a more significant focus on our revenue-generating activities and has resulted in more streamlined processes and tools that should enable us to simplify and improve how we do business with our clients and consultants.We believe we have developed long-term relationships with our clients by repeatedly providing solutions to their specialty staffing requirements. We strive to differentiate ourselves by working closely with our clients to understand their needs and maximize their return on human capital. In addition, Kforce’s ability to offer flexible staffing solutions, coupled with our permanent placement capability, offers the client a broad spectrum of specialty staffing services. We believe this ability enables Kforce to emphasize consultative rather than transactional client relationships, and therefore facilitates further client penetration and the expansion of our share of our clients’ staffing needs.
We believe our consultants are a significant component in delivering value to our clients. We are focused on efficient and effective consultant care processes, such as onboarding, frequent and ongoing communication and programs to redeploy our consultants in a timely fashion. We strive to increase the tenure and loyalty of our consultants and be their “Employer of Choice”, thus enabling us to deliver the highest quality talent to our clients.
Invest in Headcount of Revenue Generators. Given the current and expected future demand in the marketplace for the services provided by Kforce and our most tenured associates’ performance continuing to remain near peak levels, the Firm made significant investments starting in Q4 2012 and throughout 2013 in the hiring of associates that are responsible for generating revenue. The increase in revenue generator headcount from Q4 2012 to Q4 2013 was 10.3%. New associates typically take six to nine months to begin performing at expected levels. Accordingly, we expect that the investment in 2013 will result in more revenue growth during 2014. Going forward, the Firm expects to continue to hire additional revenue generators in those lines of business, geographies and industries that we believe present the greatest opportunity.
Retain our Great People.
A
significant focus of Kforce is on the retention of our tenured and top performing associates. We ended fiscal 2013 with a highly tenured management team, field sales team and back office employees, which we believe will continue to enhance our ability to achieve future profitable growth.Optimize Operating Margins. The optimization of operating margins remains the ultimate goal for Kforce as we strive to deliver profitable revenue growth. We believe our revenue-focused alignment and streamlined infrastructure will allow us to meet the needs of our clients and consultants in the most cost effective manner possible.
Narrow the Focus for Our GS Segment. The Firm has made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services. The strategy going forward will include a renewed focus on the prime solutions aspects of this business, and less emphasis on other aspects of the portfolio, including pure staff augmentation as well as product sales.
Invest in Large Client Relationships. Acontinued focus of Kforce is cultivating relationships with premier partners and strategic clients, both in terms of annual revenues and geographic dispersion. In order to achieve greater penetration within each of our largest accounts, we work to foster an understanding of our client’s needs holistically while building a consultative partnership rather than a transactional client relationship. We are increasingly concentrated on bringing our core employees closer to the customer, and with that in mind we have integrated our largest accounts leadership team into our field leadership team, enhancing our alignment to serve these clients. We believe that this strategy will allow us to more effectively drive expansion in our share of our clients’ staffing needs, as well as capturing additional overall market share.
Focus
We believe we have developed long-term relationships with our clients by repeatedly providing solutions to their specialty staffing requirements. We strive to differentiate ourselves by working closely with our clients to understand their needs and maximize their return on Value-Add Services.human capital. Finding the right match for both our clients and consultants is our ultimate priority. The placement of our highly skilled consultants requires operational and technical skill to effectively recruit and evaluate personnel, match them to client needs, and manage the resulting relationships. We believe the proper placements of consultants with the right clients will serve to balance the desire for optimal volume, rate, effort and duration of assignment, while ultimately maximizing the benefit for our clients, consultants and the Firm. In addition, Kforce’s ability to offer flexible staffing solutions, coupled with our permanent placement capability, offers the client a broad spectrum of specialty staffing services. We believe this ability enables Kforce to emphasize consultative rather than transactional client relationships, and therefore facilitates further client penetration and the expansion of our share of our clients’ staffing needs.
We concentrate resources among
Tech, FA, HIMour segments and
GSstaffing services to the areas of highest anticipated demand to adapt to the ever-changing landscape within the staffing industry. We believe our historical focus in these markets, combined with our
staff’sassociates’ operating expertise, provides us with a competitive advantage.
Optimize Operating Margins. The optimization of operating margins remains an important goal for Kforce as we strive to deliver profitable revenue growth. We believe our revenue-focused alignment and streamlined infrastructure will allow us to meet the needs of our clients and consultants in the most cost effective manner possible.
Retain our Great People. A significant focus of Kforce is on the retention of our tenured and top performing associates. We ended fiscal 2014 with an even more highly tenured management team, field sales team and back office employees, which we believe will continue to enhance our ability to achieve future profitable growth.
We believe our consultants are a significant component in delivering value to our clients. We are focused on efficient and effective consultant care processes, such as onboarding, frequent and ongoing communication and programs to redeploy our consultants in a timely fashion. We strive to increase the tenure and loyalty of our consultants and be their “Employer of Choice”, thus enabling us to deliver the highest quality talent to our clients.
Continue to Develop and Optimize our National Recruiting Center (“NRC”).We believe our centralized NRC offers us a competitive advantage. The NRC is particularly effective at increasing the quality and speed of delivery services to our clients with demands for high volume staffing. The NRC identifies and interviews active candidates from nationally contracted job boards, Kforce.com, as well as other sources, then forwards qualified candidates to Kforce field offices to be matched to available positions. The NRC has continued to evolve throughout 2013,2014, and supports all of our operating segments. There continues to be a significant demand for its resources. In 2014, we reallocated a portion of the NRC resources to a facility in Phoenix, Arizona with a goal to create greater efficiency in serving our clients in the western U.S.
We continue to focus on job order prioritization, which places greater attention on orders that we believe present the greatest opportunity and streamlining the NRC’s focus to more specific industries, customer segments and skill sets to create leverage. A continued focus for
20142015 will be to enhance the performance of the NRC in meeting demand, and enhance our efforts to support future growth by building a pipeline of qualified candidates, as well as evolving its international talent solution strategy. The Firm will continue to utilize the NRC as a training ground for field sales as top performers in the NRC with a strong knowledge of the delivery system will move into field sales roles.
Additionally, during 2014 we are working on a plan to create greater efficiency in serving our West Coast clients by reallocating a portion of the NRC resources to a facility on the West Coast.
Leverage Infrastructure. A significant focus for Kforce is to more effectively leverage the functionality built over the last several years with its front-end and back office technology infrastructure. We believe our back office system software provides a competitive advantage through the enhancement of the efficiency and performance of our sales and delivery functions. We will continue to selectively improve our front-end systems and our back office systems, including our ERP and time collection and billing systems, in areas that we believe will generate additional operating leverage. DuringIn 2014, Kforce will be adoptingadopted and implementingimplemented an Agile software development methodology (whereby requirements and solutions evolve through cross-functional teams), and undergoingunderwent an organizationorganizational transformation in orderwith a goal to maximize the responsiveness and velocitytimeliness by which value is delivered through our technology investments.Encourage Employee Achievement. We
Enhance Shareholder Value. Kforce is committed to enhancing shareholder value. In 2014, the Firm executed a significant share repurchase program, completed four quarterly dividends, and continued to focus on promoting and maintaining a quality-focused, energetic, results-oriented culture. Our field associates and corporate personnel are given incentives (which include competitions with significant prizes and internal recognition,reducing expenses. We increased the quarterly dividend amount by 10% in additionDecember 2014. Kforce expects to bonuses) to encourage achievement of Kforce’s corporate goals and high levels of service. The Firm has continued to utilize AMP! (a.k.a. Actions Maximizing Performance), a metrics-based system, in order to provide associates with current and historical performance measures relative to their Kforce peers. We believe this system fuels healthy competition and assists associates in reaching their maximum performance levels.continue these initiatives through 2015.
We serve Fortune 1000 companies, the Federal Government, state and local governments, local and regional companies, and small to mid-sized companies. Our 10 largest clients represented approximately
21%25% of revenues and no single customer accounted for more than
3%5% of revenues for the year ended December 31,
2013.2014. The specialty staffing industry is made up of thousands of companies, most of which are small local firms providing limited service offerings to a relatively small local client base. We believe Kforce is one of the 10 largest publicly-traded specialty staffing firms in the United States. According to a
recent report
published by
the SIA
105in July 2014, 124 companies reported at least $100 million in U.S. staffing revenues in
20122013 and these
105124 companies
representrepresented an estimated
54.1%54.5% of the total market. Competition in a particular market can come from many different companies, both large and small. We believe, however, that our geographic presence, diversified service offerings, NRC, focus on consistent service and delivery and effective job order prioritization all provide a competitive advantage, particularly with clients that have operations in multiple geographic markets. In addition, we believe that our
diversified portfolio of service offerings
isare primarily concentrated in areas with significant growth opportunities in both the short and long term.
Based upon previous economic cycles experienced by Kforce, we believe that times of sustained economic recovery generally stimulate demand for substantial additional U.S. workers and, conversely, an economic slowdown results in a contraction in demand for additional U.S. workers. From an economic standpoint, temporary employment figures and trends are important indicators of staffing demand, which improved during
20132014 at a greater rate than
20122013 based on data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”). Total temporary employment increased
9.6%7.8% and the penetration rate
(the percentage of temporary staffing to total employment) increased
8.4%3.4% from December
20122013 to December
2013,2014, bringing the rate to
2.06%2.13% in December
2013,2014, an all-time high. While the macro-employment picture remains uncertain, it has continuously improved, with the unemployment rate at
6.7%5.6% as of December
2013,2014, and non-farm payroll expanding an average of
182,000246,000 jobs per month in
2013.2014. Also, the college-level unemployment rate, which
we believe serves as a proxy for professional employment and is more closely aligned with the Firm’s business strategy, was at
a low 3.3%2.9% in December
2013.2014. Management believes that uncertainty in the overall U.S. economic outlook related to the political landscape, potential tax changes, geo-political risk and impact of health care reform, will continue to fuel growth in temporary staffing as employers may be reluctant to increase full-time hiring. Additionally, we believe the increasing costs of employment may be driving a
systematicsystemic shift to an increased use of temporary staff as a percentage of total workforce, which is creating reduced cyclicality in the business. If the penetration rate of temporary staffing continues to experience growth in the coming years, we believe that our Flex revenues can grow significantly even in a relatively modest growth macro-economic environment.
ManagementKforce remains optimistic about the growth prospects of the temporary staffing industry, the penetration rate, and in particular, our revenue portfolio. Of course, no reliable predictions can be made about the general economy, the staffing industry as a whole, or specialty staffing in particular.
According to
a recent staffingan industry forecast published by SIA
in September 2014, the U.S. temporary staffing industry generated estimated revenues of
$82.0 billion in 2010, $92.5 billion in 2011,
and $99.0 billion in
2012;2012 and $103.3 billion in 2013; with projected revenues of
$103.9$108.8 billion in
20132014 and
$108.9$115.0 billion in
2014.2015. Based on projected revenues of
$103.9$108.8 billion for the U.S. temporary staffing industry, this would put the Firm’s market share at approximately 1%. Therefore, our previously discussed business strategies are sharply focused around expanding our share of the U.S. temporary staffing market and further penetrating our existing clients’ staffing needs.
Over the last several years, our GS segment’s operations have been adversely impacted by the
(i)(1) continued uncertainty of funding levels of various Federal Government programs and
agencies, (ii)agencies; (2) uncertain macro-economic and political
environment,environment; and
(iii)(3) unexpected significant delays in the start-up of already executed and funded projects, which we believe were due to acute shortages of acquisition and contracting personnel within certain Federal Government agencies.
During the third quarter of 2013, the Federal Government did not pass a substantial funding bill, which resulted in a 16-day government shutdown. The shutdown ended on October 16, 2013 when the U.S. Congress agreed to a deal that extended funding for government services until January 15, 2014 and extended the debt ceiling through February 7, 2014. On January 15, 2014, Congress passed a budget for fiscal year 2014. GS management remains cautiously optimistic as it cannot predict the outcome of past, current and future efforts to reduce federal spending and whether these efforts will materially impact the future budgets of federal agencies that are clients of our GS segment.
Technology Infrastructure
A significant focus for Kforce is to more effectively leverage its technology infrastructure. We believe our back office systems provide a competitive advantage through the enhancement of the efficiency and performance of our sales and delivery functions. We continue to focus on the improvement of our front-end systems and our back office systems, including the refinement of our sales and delivery automation strategy. During 2013, we leveraged the existing system and invested in upgrades.
We expect to selectively invest in our infrastructure in 2014 and beyond, especially where we believe it will provide for a sufficient return on capital and support the future growth in our business. We are particularly focused on technologies that will make us easier to do business with and delight our clients and consultants, such as mobile applications. Also during 2014, Kforce Our GS segment will be adoptingfacing a number of re-competes in 2015 that could materially impact that segment's performance, especially given the recent emphasis by the Federal Government on awarding contracts to the lowest bidder and implementing an Agile software development methodology, and undergoing an organization transformation in order to maximize the responsiveness and velocity by which value is delivered through our technology investments.
a de-emphasis of overall funding of services.
Trade Names and Trademark
The Kforce trade names, and derivatives thereof, and GS’s “Data Confidence” trademark is important to our business. Our primary trade names and trademark are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In the
20132014 Temporary Workers Survey published by SIA, Kforce was ranked third in a name recognition survey, and ranked first among IT temporary workers.
Staffing firms are generally subject to one or more of the following types of government regulations:
(i)(1) regulation of the employer/employee relationship between a firm and its staff; such as wage and hour regulations, tax withholding and reporting, social security and other retirement, anti-discrimination, employee benefits and workers’ compensation regulations;
(ii)(2) registration, licensing, recordkeeping and reporting requirements and
(iii)(3) substantive limitations on their operations. Staffing firms are governed by laws regulating the employer/employee relationship.
In providing staffing
and solution services to the Federal Government, we must comply with complex laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of Federal Government contracts. These laws and regulations create compliance risk and affect how we do business with our federal agency clients, and may impose added costs on our business.
In the increasingly stringent regulatory environment, one of our top priorities is compliance. As we continue to evolve our infrastructure, compliance remains a primary focus. For more discussion of the potential impact that the regulatory environment could have on Kforce’s financial results, please see Item 1A. Risk Factors below.
We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented specialty staffing services industry within each of our operating segments. Within temporary staffing, the working capital requirements
are one of the more significant barrierscan be a barrier to entry, because most employees are paid weekly and customers may take 30 to 45 days or more to pay. We face substantial competition from large national firms and local specialty staffing firms. The local firms are typically operator-owned, and each market generally has one or more significant competitors. We also face competition from national clerical and light industrial staffing firms, and national and regional accounting firms that also offer certain specialty staffing services.
In addition, many companies utilize Managed Service Providers (“MSP”
) or Vendor Management Organizations ("VMO") for the management and purchase of staffing services. Generally, MSPs
and VMOs are organizations that standardize processes through the use of Vendor Management Systems (“VMS”), which are tools used to aggregate, spend and measure supplier performance. VMSs can also be provided through independent providers. Typically, MSPs,
VMOs and/or VMS providers charge staffing firms administrative fees of 1% to 3% of total service revenues, and these fees are usually recorded by staffing firms as a cost of services, thereby compressing profit margins. While Kforce does not currently provide MSP or
VMSVMO services directly to its clients, our strategy is to work with specific MSPs,
VMOs and VMS providers to enable us to extend our Flex staffing services to the widest customer base possible within the sectors we serve.
As stated previously, there are
105124 staffing firms with more than $100 million in U.S. staffing revenues in operation and thousands of smaller organizations compete to varying degrees at local
levels, according to a recent SIA report.levels. Several similar companies – global, national, and local – compete in foreign markets. Our peer group for
2013,2014, which is comprised of some of our largest competitors, included: CDI Corp., CIBER, Inc., Computer Task Group Inc., Manpower Inc., On Assignment, Inc., Resources Connection, Inc., Robert Half International Inc., and TrueBlue Inc.
Kforce believes that the availability and quality of associates and consultants, level of service, effective monitoring of job performance, scope of geographic service, and price are the principal elements of competition in our industry. We believe that availability of quality associates and consultants is especially important. In order to attract candidates, we place emphasis upon our ability to provide competitive compensation and benefits, quality and varied assignments, scheduling flexibility, and permanent placement opportunities, all of which are important to Kforce being the “Employer of Choice.” Because personnel pursue other employment opportunities on a regular basis, it is important that we respond to market conditions affecting these individuals, and focus on our consultant care objectives. Additionally, in certain markets and in response to economic softening, we have experienced significant pricing pressure from some of our competitors. Although we believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors, we expect competition and pricing pressure to continue, and there can be no assurance that we will remain competitive.
Seasonality of Operating Results
Our quarterly operating results are affected by the number of billing days in a quarter and the seasonality of our customers’ businesses. The majority of our
operatingreporting segments are significantly impacted by the increase in the number of holidays and vacation days taken during the fourth quarter of the calendar year. In addition, we experience an increase in direct costs of services and a corresponding decrease in gross profit in the first fiscal quarter of each year, as a result of certain annual U.S. state and federal employment tax resets that occur at the beginning of each year.
Kforce maintains a number of insurance policies including general liability, automobile liability and employers’ liability; each with excess liability coverage. We also maintain workers’ compensation, fidelity, fiduciary, directors and officers, professional liability, and employment practices liability policies. These policies provide coverage subject to their terms, conditions, limits of liability, and deductibles, for certain liabilities that may arise from Kforce’s operations. There can be no assurance that any of the above policies will be adequate for our needs or that we will maintain all such policies in the future.
Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations
Substantially all of Kforce’s revenues are derived from domestic operations with customers located in the United States and substantially all long-lived assets
arewere located in the United States for the three years ended December 31,
2013.2014. One of our subsidiaries, Global, provides outsourcing services internationally through an office in Manila, Philippines. Our international operations comprised
approximatelyless than 2% of net service revenues for each of the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011.2012.
Financial Information about Business Segments
We provide our clients staffing services and solutions through
four operatingthree reporting segments: Tech, FA
HIM and GS. For segment financial data see Note
1716 – “Reportable Segments”
in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating Employees and Personnel
As of December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce employed approximately 2,600 associates and had
approximately 11,900more than 11,000 consultants on assignment (“Flexible Consultants”) providing flexible staffing services and solutions to our clients. Approximately
90%91% of the Flexible Consultants are employed directly by Kforce (“Flexible Employees”); the balance consists of individuals who are employed by other entities (“Independent Contractors”) that provide their employees as subcontractors to Kforce for assignment to its clients. As the employer, Kforce is responsible for the operating employees’ and Flexible Employees’ payrolls and the employer’s share of applicable social security taxes (“FICA”), federal and state unemployment taxes, workers’ compensation insurance, and other direct labor costs relating to our employees. We offer access to various health, life and disability insurance programs and other benefits for operating employees and Flexible Employees. We have no collective bargaining agreements covering any of our operating employees or Flexible Employees, have never experienced any material labor disruption, and are unaware of any current efforts or plans to organize any of our employees.
Availability of Reports and Other Information
We make available, free of charge, through the Investor Relations page on our website, and by responding to requests addressed to Michael Blackman, our Chief Corporate Development Officer, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A and amendments to those materials filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically submit such materials to the SEC. Our corporate website address is http://www.kforce.com. The information contained on our website, or on other websites linked to our website, is not part of this document.
In addition, the SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. The SEC makes available on its website, free of charge, reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC.
The SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. Information provided on the SEC’s website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Kforce faces significant employment-related legal risk.
Kforce employs people internally and in the workplaces of other businesses.
Many of these individuals have access to client information systems and confidential information. An inherent risk of such activity includes possible
claims of errors and omissions; intentional misconduct; release, misuse or misappropriation of client intellectual property, confidential information, funds, or other property; cyber security breaches affecting our clients and/or us; discrimination and harassment claims;
wrongful termination; violations of employment rights related to employment screening or privacy issues; classification of workers as employees or independent contractors; violations of wage and hour requirements; employment of illegal aliens; criminal activity; torts; or other claims. Such claims may result in negative publicity, injunctive relief, criminal investigations and/or charges, civil litigation, payment by Kforce of monetary damages or fines, or other material adverse effects on our business. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for professional malpractice liability, fidelity, employment practices liability, and general liability in amounts and with deductibles that we believe
areis appropriate for our operations. Our insurance coverage, however, may not cover all potential claims against us, may require us to meet a deductible or may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost. In this regard, we face various employment-related risks not covered by insurance, such as wage and hour laws and employment tax responsibility. U.S. Courts in recent years have been receiving large numbers of wage and hour class action claims alleging misclassification of overtime eligible workers and/or failure to pay overtime-eligible workers for all hours worked. In addition, there appears to be a heightened state and federal scrutiny of independent contractor relationships, which could adversely affect us given that we utilize a significant number of independent contractors to perform our services. An adverse determination of the independent contractor status of these firms could result in a substantial tax or other liabilities.
Kforce may be exposed to unforeseeable negative acts by our personnel that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
An inherent risk of employing people internally and in the workplace of other businesses is that many of these individuals have access to client information systems and confidential information. Such activity includes possible acts of errors and omissions; intentional misconduct; release, misuse or misappropriation of client intellectual property, confidential information, funds, or other property; cyber security breaches affecting our clients and/or us; or other acts. Such acts may result in negative publicity or other material adverse effects on our business. In addition, these occurrences may give rise to litigation, which could be time-consuming and expensive. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for types and amounts we believe are appropriate in light of the aforementioned exposures. There can be no assurance that the corporate policies and practices we have in place to help reduce our exposure to these risks will be effective or that we will not experience losses as a result of these risks.
Our business is significantly affected by fluctuations in general economic conditions.
Demand for staffing services is significantly affected by the general level of economic activity and employment in the United States. Based upon previous economic cycles experienced by Kforce, we believe that times of sustained economic recovery generally stimulate demand for additional U.S. workers and, conversely, an economic slowdown results in a contraction in demand for additional U.S. workers. As economic activity slows, companies may defer projects for which they utilize our services or reduce their use of temporary employees before laying off full-time employees. In addition, an economic downturn could result in a reduction in the temporary staffing penetration rate, an increase in the unemployment rate and a deceleration of growth in the segments in which we operate. We may also experience more competitive pricing pressures during periods of economic downturn. Approximately 98% of our revenue is generated by our business operations in the United States. Any substantial economic downturn in the United States could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Kforce may be adversely affected by government regulation of the staffing business and of the workplace.
Our business is subject to regulation and licensing in many states. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to obtain all necessary licenses or approvals or that the cost of compliance will not prove to be material. If we fail to comply, such failure could materially adversely affect Kforce’s financial results.
A large part of our business entails employing individuals on a temporary basis and placing such individuals in clients’ workplaces. Increased government regulation of the workplace or of the employer-employee relationship could have a material adverse effect on Kforce.
Our collection, use and retention of personal information and personal health information create risks that may harm our business.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and retain personal information of our associates and
flexible employeesFlexible Employees and their
dependantsdependents including, without limitation, full names, social security numbers, addresses, birth dates, and payroll-related information.
We also have access to, receive and use personal health information in the ordinary course of our HIM businesses. We use commercially available information security technologies to protect such information in digital format. We also use security and business controls to limit access to such information. However, employees or third parties
(including third parties with substantially greater resources than our own; for example, foreign governments) may be able to circumvent these measures and acquire or misuse such information, resulting in breaches of privacy, and errors in the storage, use or transmission of such
information may result in breaches of privacy.information. Privacy breaches may require notification and other remedies, which can be costly, and which may have other serious adverse consequences for our business, including regulatory penalties and fines, claims for breach of contract, claims for damages, adverse publicity, reduced demand for our services by clients and/or flex employment candidates, harm to our reputation, and regulatory oversight by state or federal agencies.
The possession and use of personal information and data in conducting our business subjects us to legislative and regulatory burdens. We may be required to incur significant expenses to comply with mandatory privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards or contractual obligations.
Kforce may be adversely affected by immigration restrictions.
Our Tech business utilizes a significant number of foreign nationals employed by us on work visas, primarily under the H-1B visa classification. The H-1B visa classification that enables U.S. employers to hire qualified foreign nationals is subject to legislative and administrative changes, as well as changes in the application of standards and enforcement. Immigration laws and regulations can be significantly affected by political developments and levels of economic activity. Current and future restrictions on the availability of such visas could restrain our ability to employ the skilled professionals we need to meet our clients’ needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In 2009, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”) significantly increased its scrutiny of companies seeking to sponsor, renew or transfer H-1B status, including Kforce and Kforce’s subcontractors. On January 8, 2010, the USCIS issued internal guidance to its field offices that appears to narrow the eligibility criteria for H-1B status in the context of staffing services. In addition to USCIS restrictions, certain aspects of the H-1B program are also subject to regulation and review by the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of State, which have recently increased enforcement activities in the program. A narrow interpretation and vigorous enforcement, or legislative action relating to immigration, including legislation intended to reform existing immigration law, could adversely affect our ability to obtain foreign national labor and/or renew existing foreign national consultants on assignment, and could subject us to fines, penalties and sanctions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to keep or replace all foreign nationals currently on assignment, or continue to hire foreign national talent at the same rates as in the past.
Kforce maintains debt which could impact operating flexibility and contains restrictive covenants that could trigger prepayment of obligations or additional costs.
We have a credit facility consisting of a revolving line of credit of up to $170 million. Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Firm, excluding the real estate located at the Firm's corporate headquarters in Tampa, FL, unless the eligible real estate conditions are met.
Our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our credit agreement could have important consequences for investors including the following: (1) we will have to use a portion of our cash flow from operations for debt services rather than for our operations; (2) we may not be able to
maintain sufficient cash flowobtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures or
borrowing capacityother corporate purposes or may have to
support operations.On September 20, 2011, Kforce entered into a Third Amendedpay more for such financing; (3) we could be less able to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities, and Restated Credit Agreement with a syndicate led by Bank of America, N.A., which was amended on March 30, 2012to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and December 27, 2013 (as amended to date, the “Credit Facility”). The Firm executed a Second Amendment and Joinder on December 27, 2013, increasing the original borrowing capacity up from $100 million to $135 million by executing the accordion feature under the Credit Facility. Kforce has a remaining accordion option of $15 million. The maximum borrowings available to Kforce under the Credit Facility are limited to: (a) a revolving credit facility of up to $135 million (the “Revolving Loan Amount”) and (b) a $15 million sub-limit included in the Credit Facility for letters of credit.
Kforce’s liquidity(4) we may be adversely impacted by covenants in our Credit Facility. Borrowing availability under the Credit Facility is limiteddisadvantaged compared to the remainder of (a) the lesser of (i) $135 million minus the four week average aggregate weekly payroll of employees assigned to work for customers, or (ii) 85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable, plus 80% of the net amount of eligible unbilled accounts receivable, plus 80% of the net amount of eligible employee placement accounts, minus certain minimum availability reserves, and in either case, minus (b) the aggregate outstanding amount under the Credit Facility. Under the Credit Facility, competitors with less leverage.
Kforce is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants
including (but not limited to) the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 if the Firm’s availability under the
Credit Facility is less thancredit facility. Our failure to comply with such restrictive covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in Kforce being required to repay the
greater of 10% ofoutstanding balance before the
aggregate amount of the commitment of all of the lenders under the Credit Facility and $11.0 million. Kforce had availability under the Credit Facility of $43.2 million as of December 31, 2013; therefore, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio wasdue date. We may not
applicable. Kforce believes that it will be able to
maintain the minimum availability requirement; however, in the event that Kforce is unablerepay our debt or if forced to
do so, Kforce may fail the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, which would constitute an eventrefinance on terms not acceptable to us could have a material adverse affect on our results of
default.At no time during the existence of the Credit Facility, or any of its predecessors (i.e., the Credit Agreement, the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) have we failed to meet the minimum availability and fixed charge coverage ratio requirements. If we did not comply with these financial covenants, such a breach of the Credit Facility could adversely affect our liquidityoperations and financial condition and could result, among other things, in the accelerationcondition.
Kforce’s temporary staffing business could be adversely impacted by
the health care reform.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(PPACA) imposes new mandates on individuals and employers, requiring most individuals to have health insurance. Beginning in 2015, the PPACA assesses penalties on large employers that
were both signed into law in March 2010 could have an adverse effect on Kforce by increasing the cost of providing temporary staffing services. The provisions of these Acts went into effect in 2014.do not offer health insurance meeting certain coverage, value, or affordability standards. While we believe the costs associated with the law
shouldmay have less
of an impact on Kforce than many other staffing companies due to the level and scope of benefits we
already offer, a delay in or inability to increase bill rates charged to our customers could result in a reduction of our Flex gross profit.
In addition, because the regulations governing the PPACA’s employer mandate are new and subject to interpretation, it is possible that Kforce may incur liability in the form of penalties, fines, or damages if the health plans we offer are subsequently found not to meet minimum essential coverage, affordability or minimum value standards, or if our method for determining eligibility for coverage is found inadequate or our clients seek indemnification for health care claims resulting from consultants working on client assignments. The cost of any such penalties, fines or damages could have a material adverse effect on Kforce’s financial and operating results.
We are exposed to intangible asset risk which could result in future impairment.
A significant and sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization, a significant decline in our (or in one or more of our reporting units’) expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates, or changes in our business strategy have resulted, and could result in the future, in the need to perform an impairment analysis. If we were to conclude that a future
write downwrite-down of our goodwill or other intangible assets is necessary, it could result in material charges that are adverse to our operating results and financial position. See Note 6 – “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”
in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Estimates” for further details, including the details regarding the goodwill impairment losses within our GS reporting
unit.unit in recent years.
Significant legal actions could subject Kforce to substantial uninsured liabilities.
Professional service providers are subject to legal actions alleging malpractice, breach of contract and other legal theories. These actions may involve large claims and significant defense costs. We may also be subject to claims alleging violations of federal or state labor laws. In addition, we may be subject to claims related to torts, intentional acts, or crimes committed by our full-time employees or temporary staffing personnel. In some instances, we are contractually obligated to indemnify clients against such risks. A failure to observe the applicable standard of care, relevant Kforce or client policies and guidelines, or applicable federal, state,
local or
localforeign laws, rules, and regulations could result in negative publicity, payment of fines, significant damage awards, or settlement expense. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for professional malpractice liability, fidelity, employment practices liability and general liability, in amounts and with deductibles that we believe are appropriate for our operations. Our insurance coverage, however, may not cover all claims against us or continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost.
We face certain risks
Delays or defaults in collecting our trade accounts
receivable.receivable could adversely affect our business.
We generate a significant amount of trade accounts receivable from our customers. Delays or defaults in payments owed to us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Factors that could cause a delay or default include business failures, turmoil in the financial and credit markets, sluggish or recessionary U.S. economic conditions, our exposure to customers in high-risk sectors such as the financial services industry, and declines in the credit worthiness of our customers. See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”
in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Kforce’s success depends upon retaining the services of its management team and key operating employees.
Kforce is highly dependent on its management team and expects that continued success will depend largely upon their efforts and abilities. The loss of the services of any key executive for any reason could have a material adverse effect upon Kforce. Success also depends upon our ability to identify, develop, and retain qualified operating employees; particularly management, client servicing, and candidate recruiting employees. Kforce expends significant resources in the recruiting and training of its employees, as the pool of available applicants for these positions is limited. The loss of some of our key operating employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to establish and maintain client and candidate, professional, and technical relationships.
The financial markets may experience significant turmoil, which may negatively impact our liquidity and our ability to obtain financing.
Kforce's liquidity is dependent in part on our revolving credit facility, which is provided by a syndicate of banks. Our liquidity
and our ability to obtain financing may be negatively impacted if one of our lenders under our
Credit Facility,credit facility, or another financial institution, suffers liquidity issues. In such an event, we may not be able to draw on any of the amounts available under our
Credit Facility,credit facility, or a substantial portion thereof.
The Credit Facility expires on September 20, 2016. If we attempt to obtain future financing in addition to, or as a replacement of, our
Credit Facility,credit facility, financial market turmoil could negatively impact our ability to obtain such financing on favorable terms.
Kforce depends on the proper functioning of its information systems.
Kforce is dependent on the proper functioning of information systems in operating its business. Critical information systems are used in every aspect of Kforce’s daily operations, most significantly, in the identification and matching of staffing resources to client assignments and in the customer billing and consultant or vendor payment functions. Kforce’s information systems are vulnerable to natural disasters (we are headquartered and our leased data center are located in a hurricane-prone area), fire or casualty theft, technical failures, terrorist acts, cyber security breaches, power loss, telecommunications failures, physical or software intrusions, computer viruses, and similar events. If our critical information systems fail or are otherwise unavailable, we would have to accomplish these functions manually, which could prove difficult or impossible, causing a material adverse effect on our business. Also, any theft or misuse of information resulting from a security breach could result in, among other things, loss of significant and/or sensitive information, litigation by affected parties, financial obligations resulting from such theft or misuse, higher insurance premiums, governmental investigations, negative reactions from current and potential future customers (including potential negative financial ramifications under certain customer contract provisions) and poor publicity and any of these could adversely affect our financial results. In addition, we depend on third-party vendors for certain functions (including the operations of our leased data center), whose future performance and reliability we cannot control.
Significant increases in payroll-related costs could adversely affect Kforce’s business.
Kforce is required to pay a number of federal, state, and local payroll and related costs, including unemployment taxes, workers’ compensation and insurance premiums and claims, FICA, and Medicare, among others, related to our employees. Significant increases in the effective rates of any payroll-related costs would likely have a material adverse effect on Kforce. Over the last few years, many of the states in which Kforce conducts business have continued to significantly increase their state unemployment tax rates in an effort to increase funding for unemployment benefits. Costs could also increase as a result of health care reforms or the possible imposition of additional requirements and restrictions related to the placement of personnel. We may not be able to increase the fees charged to our clients in a timely manner or in a sufficient amount to cover these potential cost increases.
Adverse results in tax audits could result in significant cash expenditures or exposure to unforeseen liabilities.
Kforce is subject to periodic federal, state, and local tax audits for various tax years. Although Kforce attempts to comply with all taxing authority regulations, adverse findings or assessments made by taxing authorities as the result of an audit could have a material adverse effect on Kforce.
Due to inherent limitations, there can be no assurance that our system of disclosure and internal controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors and fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to management.
Our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)CEO and
Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”),CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Kforce have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our business is dependent upon maintaining our reputation, our relationships, and our performance.
The reputation and relationships that we have established and currently maintain with our customers are important to maintaining existing business and identifying new business. If our reputation or relationships were damaged, it could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, if our performance does not meet our customers’ expectations, our revenues and operating results could be materially harmed.
We rely on short-term engagements with most of our clients.
Because long-term engagements are not a significant part of our business, other than in our GS segment, future financial results cannot be reliably predicted by considering past trends or extrapolating past results.
Kforce’s current market share may decrease as a result of limited barriers to entry for new competitors and discontinuation of clients outsourcing their staffing needs.
We face significant competition in the markets we serve, and there are limited barriers to entry for new competitors. The competition among staffing services firms is intense. Kforce competes for potential clients with providers of outsourcing services, systems integrators, computer systems consultants, temporary personnel agencies, search firms, and other providers of staffing services. Some of our competitors possess substantially greater resources than we do. From time to time, we experience significant pressure from our clients to reduce price levels. During these periods, we may face increased competitive pricing pressures and may not be able to recruit the personnel necessary to fulfill our clients’ needs. We also face the risk that certain of our current and prospective clients will decide to provide similar services internally.
Competition for acquisition opportunities may restrict Kforce’s future growth by limiting our ability to make acquisitions at reasonable valuations.
Kforce has increased its market share and presence in the staffing industry partly through strategic acquisitions of companies that have complemented or enhanced its business. We have historically faced competition for acquisitions. In the future, this could limit our ability to grow through acquisitions or could raise the prices of acquisitions and make them less accretive or possibly non-accretive to us. In addition, Kforce may be limited by its ability to obtain financing to consummate desirable acquisitions.
Kforce may not be able to recruit and retain qualified personnel.
Kforce depends upon the abilities of its staff to attract and retain personnel, particularly technical, professional, and cleared government services personnel, who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the staffing requirements of our clients. We must continually evaluate and upgrade our base of available qualified personnel to keep pace with changing client needs and emerging technologies. We expect significant competition for individuals with proven technical or professional skills for the foreseeable future. If qualified personnel are not available to us in sufficient numbers and upon economic terms acceptable to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Kforce may face significant risk arising from acquisitions or dispositions.
Kforce may face difficulties integrating future acquisitions into existing operations and acquisitions may be unsuccessful, involve significant cash expenditures, or expose Kforce to unforeseen liabilities.
These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
potential loss of key employees or clients of acquired companies;
difficulties integrating acquired personnel and distinct cultures into a single business;
diversion of management attention from existing operations; and
assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies.
These acquisitions may also involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, integration expenses, and exposure to unforeseen liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Any acquisition may ultimately have a negative impact on our business and financial condition.
In addition, dispositions involve risks, which could have a material adverse effect on us including:
we may not be able to identify acceptable buyers;
we may divest a business at a price or on terms that are differentless favorable than anticipated;
we may lose key employees;
divestitures could adversely affect our profitability and, under certain circumstances, require us to record impairment charges or a loss as a result of the transaction;
completing divestitures requires expenses and management effort;
we may become subject to indemnity obligations and/or remain liable or contingently liable for obligations related to the divested business or operations;
the retentionwe may retain of certain continuing liabilities under contracts;
covenants not to compete could impair our ability to attract and retain customers; and
we may face difficulties in the separation of the divested operations, services, products and personnel.
Provisions in Kforce’s articles and bylaws and under Florida law may have certain anti-takeover effects.
Kforce’s articles of incorporation and bylaws and Florida law contain provisions that may have the effect of inhibiting a non-negotiated merger or other business combination. In particular, our articles of incorporation provide for a staggered board of directors and permit the removal of directors only for cause. Additionally,
managementthe Board may issue up to 15 million shares of preferred stock, and fix the rights and preferences thereof, without a further vote of the shareholders. In addition, certain of our officers and managers have employment agreements containing certain provisions that call for substantial payments to be made to such employees in certain circumstances upon a change in control. Certain of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of Kforce, including an acquisition in which shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. As a result, shareholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity to do so. Moreover, the existence of these provisions could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
Kforce’s stock price may be volatile.
Kforce’s common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
underusing the
ticker symbol “KFRC.” The market price of our stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and could fluctuate substantially in the future, based on a variety of factors, including our operating results, changes in general conditions in the economy, the financial markets, the employment services industry, or other developments affecting us, our clients, or our competitors; some of which may be unrelated to our performance.
In addition, the stock market in general, especially The NASDAQ Global Select Market tier, along with market prices for staffing companies, has experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating results.
Among other things, volatility in our stock price could mean that investors will not be able to sell their shares at or above the prices they pay. The volatility also could impair our ability in the future to offer common stock as a source of additional capital or as consideration in the acquisition of other businesses.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR GOVERNMENT
BUSINESSESBUSINESS
Our GS segment is substantially dedicated to contracting with and serving U.S. Federal Government agencies (the “Federal Agency Business”). In addition, Kforce supplies services to the Federal Government. Federal contractors, including Kforce face a number of risks, including the following:
Our failure to comply with complex federal procurement laws and regulations could cause us to lose business, incur additional costs, and subject us to a variety of penalties, including suspension and debarment from doing business with the Federal Government.
We must comply with complex laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of Federal Government contracts. These laws and regulations create compliance risk, affect how we do business with our federal agency clients, and may impose added costs on our business. If a government review, audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, harm to our reputation, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with Federal Government agencies.
The Federal Government also may reform its procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, including cost accounting standards, that could be costly to satisfy or that could impact our ability to obtain new contracts. A failure to comply with all applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions, or suspension or debarment from contracting with the Federal Government; each of which could lead to a material reduction in our revenues, cash flows and operating results.
Unfavorable government audit results could force us to refund previously recognized revenues and could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions.
Federal agencies can audit and review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure, incurred cost submissions and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. An audit of our work, including an audit of work performed by companies Kforce has acquired or may acquire, or subcontractors we have hired or may hire, could force us to refund previously recognized revenues.
If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with Federal Government agencies. In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us, whether or not true.
We are dependent upon the ability of government agencies to administratively manage our contracts.
After we are awarded a contract and the contract is funded by the Federal Government, we are still dependent upon the ability of the relevant agency to administratively manage our contract. We can be adversely impacted by delays in the start-up of already awarded and funded projects, including delays due to shortages of acquisition and contracting personnel within the Federal Government agencies.
The failure by Congress to approve budgets, raise the U.S. debt ceiling or avoid sequestration on a timely basis for the federal agencies we support could delay, reduce or stop federal spending and cause us to lose revenue or impair our intangible assets.
On an annual basis, Congress must approve and the President must sign the appropriation bills that govern spending by each of the federal agencies we support. If Congress is unable to agree on budget priorities and is unable to appropriate funds or pass the annual budget on a timely basis, as has been the case in recent years, there may be delays, reductions or cessations of funding for our services and solutions. In addition, from time to time it has been necessary for Congress to raise the U.S. debt ceiling in order to allow for borrowing necessary to fund government operations. If that becomes necessary again and Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling on a timely basis, there may be delays, reductions or cessations of funding for our services and solutions. Furthermore, legislatively mandated cuts in federal programs, known as sequestration, could result in delays, reductions or cessation of funding for our services and solutions.
Changes in the spending policies or budget priorities of the Federal Government could cause us to lose revenue.
Changes in Federal Government fiscal or spending policies could materially adversely affect our
government agency business;Federal Agency Business; in particular, our business could be materially adversely affected by decreases in Federal Government spending.
Our
federal agency businessFederal Agency Business is dependent upon maintaining our reputation, our relationships and our performance.
The reputation and relationships that we have established and currently maintain with government agencies are important to maintaining existing business and identifying new business. If our reputation or relationships were damaged, it could have a material adverse effect. In addition, if our performance does not meet agency expectations, our revenues and operating results could be materially harmed.
Competition is intense in the
federal agency business.Federal Agency Business.
There is often intense competition to win federal agency contracts. Even when a contract is awarded to us, competitors may protest such awards. If we are unable to successfully compete for new business or win competitions to maintain existing business, our operations could be materially adversely affected. Many of our competitors are larger and have greater resources, larger client bases, and greater brand recognition than we do. Our larger competitors also may be able to provide clients with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide.
Loss of our General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedules or other contracting vehicles could impair our ability to win new business.
GSA Schedules constitute a significant percentage of revenues from our federal agency clients. If we were to lose one or more of these Schedules or other contracting vehicles, we could lose revenues and our operating results could be materially adversely affected. These Schedules or contracts typically have an initial term with multiple options that may be exercised by our government agency clients to extend the contract for successive periods of one or more years. We can provide no assurance that our clients will exercise these options.
Our failure to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances may limit our ability to perform classified work for government clients, which could cause us to lose business.
Some government contracts require us to maintain facility security clearances and require some of our employees to maintain individual security clearances. If our employees lose or are unable to timely obtain security clearances, or we lose a facility clearance, a government agency client may terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration.
Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, which could harm our business.
Like all government contractors, we are exposed to the risk that employee fraud or other misconduct could occur. Misconduct by our employees could include intentional failures to comply with Federal Government procurement regulations, engaging in unauthorized activities, seeking reimbursement for improper expenses, or falsifying time records. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of our clients’ sensitive or classified information, which could result in regulatory sanctions against us and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and precautions to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in controlling such risks or losses, which could materially adversely affect our business.
Security breaches in sensitive government information systems could result in the loss of our clients and cause negative publicity.
Many of the systems we develop, install, and maintain involve managing and protecting information used in intelligence, national security, and other sensitive or classified government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, damage our reputation, and prevent us from being eligible for further work on sensitive or classified systems for Federal Government clients. We could incur losses from such a security breach that could exceed the policy limits under our insurance. Damage to our reputation or limitations on our eligibility for additional work resulting from a security breach in one of our systems could materially reduce our revenues.
We are the prime contractor on many of our contracts and if our subcontractors fail to appropriately perform their obligations, our performance and our ability to win future contracts could be harmed.
For many of our contracts where we are the prime contractor, we involve subcontractors, which we rely on to perform a portion of the services that we must provide to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors, including disputes regarding the quality and timeliness of work performed or customer concerns about the subcontractor’s performance. In addition, the contracting parties on which we rely may be affected by changes in the economic environment and constraints on available financing to meet their performance requirements or provide needed supplies on a timely basis. A failure by one or more of those contracting parties to provide the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services on a timely basis may affect our ability to perform our obligations.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Item 2. Properties.
On May 27, 2010, we acquired our corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, which is approximately 128,000 square feet of space. Leases for our field offices, which are located throughout the U.S., range from three to five-year terms although
there are a
fewlimited number of leases contain short-term renewal provisions that range from month-to-month
arrangements andto one
10-year lease term.year. We also lease an office in Manila, Philippines, which is approximately 17,000 square feet of space.
Although additional field offices may be established based on the requirements of our operations, we believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs, and we do not expect to materially expand our facilities in the foreseeable future.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
On June 18, 2013, Kforce, along with other staffing firms, was named as a defendant
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in
a class action lawsuit filedlegal proceedings, claims, and administrative matters that arise in
the Orange County Superior Court of the State of California. The plaintiff alleges that a class of current and former Kforce employees working in California was denied compensation for the time they spent interviewing with current and potential clients of Kforce, over a period covering four years prior to the filing of the complaint. The plaintiff seeks recovery in an unspecified amount for this alleged unpaid compensation, the alleged failure of Kforce to provide them with accurate wage statements, the alleged improper use of debit cards as an employee payment mechanism in certain circumstances, alleged unfair competition, and statutory penalties, attorney’s fees and other damages. On August 30, 2013, Kforce moved the matter to the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California, Case No. 8:13cv1356. On January 30, 2014, the U.S. District Court of Central District of California substantially granted summary judgment in favor of Kforce with the exception of the plaintiff’s claim for waiting time penalties, which is an individual claim and not part of the class action. The case has been remanded to Orange County Superior Court. Absent a successful appeal of the class action allegations by the plaintiff, this case does not present a reasonable possibility of a material loss. At this stage of the litigation for the individual claim, it is not reasonable to estimate the outcome or a range of loss, should a loss occur. Accordingly, no amounts have been provided for in Kforce’s Financial Statements.On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida unsealed a qui tam complaint that had been filed by a terminated former employee in June of last year. The complaint was filed against Kforce and Kforce Government Solutions Inc. (“KGS”). It alleges False Claims Act and federal and state whistleblower statute violations and certain accounting irregularities, as well as employment law and defamation claims. The United States government has not intervened in this action at this time. While the qui tam action was first disclosed to Kforce and KGS on February 19, 2014, counsel for the former employee previously informed Kforce and KGS of substantially similar allegations in a postemployment demand letter. After the allegations were raised, the matter was referred to the Audit Committee of Kforce’s Board of Directors for an investigation. The Audit Committee retained experienced, independent counsel for investigation. With the help of forensic accountants, the investigators concluded that the False Claims Act and accounting irregularity allegations raised in the demand letter were unsupported by material, credible evidence. Due to, among other things, this independent investigation, Kforce and KGS believe the allegations in the complaint are factually inaccurate and without merit. Kforce and KGS intend to vigorously defend the litigation. At this stage of the litigation, it is not reasonable to estimate the outcome or a range of loss, should a loss occur. Accordingly, no amounts have been provided for in Kforce’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the ordinary course of its business, Kforceour business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters for which an accrual has not been made, we have not yet determined that a loss is from time to time threatened with litigationprobable or named as a defendant in various lawsuits and administrative proceedings.the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While management doesthe ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of these other mattersparticular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour consolidated financial position, results of operations, financial position or cash flows, litigation is subject to certain inherent uncertainties.flows. Kforce maintains liability insurance in such amounts and with such coverage and deductibles as management believes is reasonable. The principal liability risks that Kforce insures against are workers’ compensation, personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and omissions, employment practices liability and fidelity losses. There can be no assurance that Kforce’s liability insurance will cover all events or that the limits of coverage will be sufficient to fully cover all liabilities.
Kforce Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible. In each case, however, except where otherwise noted, we have either determined that the range of loss is not awarereasonably estimable or that any reasonably estimable range of any litigationloss is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida unsealed a qui tam complaint that
would reasonably be expectedhad been filed by a terminated former employee in June of 2013. The complaint was filed against Kforce and Kforce Government Solutions Inc., was captioned United States of America and William Turner, Relator v. Kforce Government Solutions Inc. and Kforce Inc., Case No. 8:13-cv-1517-T-36TBM, and was amended on April 14, 2014. The amended complaint alleges False Claims Act and federal and state whistleblower statute violations and certain accounting irregularities, as well as employment law and defamation claims. On June 13, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to
havedismiss the complaint. On October 8, 2014, the United States government filed a
material effect onnotice of its
resultselection to decline to intervene in the case. On November 10, 2014, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss all federal claims with prejudice, and also dismissed the state law claims without prejudice for lack of
operations, its cash flows or its financial condition.Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures. |
jurisdiction. Mr. Turner appealed the court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, where the case is currently pending as USCA Case No. 14-15529.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
underusing the
ticker symbol “KFRC”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low intra-day sales price of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. These prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markups, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended | |
| | | March 31, | | | June 30, | | | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
High | | $ | 16.65 | | | $ | 16.43 | | | $ | 17.99 | | | $ | 21.37 | |
Low | | $ | 13.36 | | | $ | 12.23 | | | $ | 14.69 | | | $ | 16.83 | |
2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
High | | $ | 15.02 | | | $ | 15.40 | | | $ | 14.43 | | | $ | 14.92 | |
Low | | $ | 12.01 | | | $ | 12.14 | | | $ | 10.34 | | | $ | 10.66 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, | | June 30, | | September 30, | | December 31, |
| 2014 | | | | | | | |
| High | $ | 22.59 |
| | $ | 23.80 |
| | $ | 22.76 |
| | $ | 24.72 |
|
| Low | $ | 17.30 |
| | $ | 19.97 |
| | $ | 17.20 |
| | $ | 18.65 |
|
| 2013 | | | | | | | |
| High | $ | 16.65 |
| | $ | 16.43 |
| | $ | 17.99 |
| | $ | 21.37 |
|
| Low | $ | 13.36 |
| | $ | 12.23 |
| | $ | 14.69 |
| | $ | 16.83 |
|
From January 1,
20142015 through February 24,
2014,2015, the high and low intra-day sales price of our common stock was
$21.71$24.99 and
$17.30,$22.34, respectively. On February 24,
2014,2015, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was
$20.76$24.11 per share.
As of February 24,
2014,2015, there were approximately
182175 holders of record.
Kforce’s Board may, at its discretion, declare and pay dividends on the outstanding shares of Kforce’s common stock out of retained earnings, subject to statutory requirements. Dividends for any outstanding and unvested restricted stock as of the record date are awarded in the form of additional shares of forfeitable restricted stock, at the same rate as the cash dividend on common stock and based on the closing stock price on the record date. Such additional shares have the same vesting terms and conditions as the outstanding and unvested restricted stock. During 2014, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share on each of February 7, 2014, April 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014. On December 3, 2014, the Board declared an increase to the cash dividend bringing the quarterly dividend to $0.11 per share of common stock. No dividend payments were declared during the first nine months of 2013. A cash dividend on common stock of $0.10 per share was declared on December 4,
2013 and paid on December 30, 2013 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 16, 2013.
A special cash dividend on common stock of $1.00 per share was declared on December 7, 2012 and paid on December 27, 2012 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 17, 2012.We
Kforce currently
expectexpects to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to
ourits December
20132014 dividend of
$0.10$0.11 per share. However, the
declarationamount and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by
ourKforce’s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of
ourthe Firm’s financial
performance.performance and legal ability to pay. There can be no assurances that dividends will be paid in the future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | | Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a) (1) | | | Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b) (2) | | | Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)) (c) (3) (4) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kforce Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 3,133,173 | |
Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan | | | 82,768 | | | $ | 12.49 | | | | 34,425 | |
Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 2,851,401 | |
Kforce Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (5) | | | 97,814 | | | $ | 10.79 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 180,582 | | | $ | 11.57 | | | | 6,018,999 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(1) | | Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(2) | | Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans
(3) (4) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | | | | | | |
| Kforce Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 2,424,078 |
|
| Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan | | 35,000 |
| | $ | 12.14 |
| | 34,425 |
|
| Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 2,816,041 |
|
| Kforce Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (5) | | 22,300 |
| | $ | 11.00 |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 57,300 |
| | $ | 11.70 |
| | 5,274,544 |
|
| |
| (1) | In addition to the number of securities listed in this column, 549,913811,854 shares and 260,632169,796 shares of restricted stock granted under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively, have been issued and are unvested as of December 31, 2013.2014. |
| |
| (2) | The weighted-average exercise price excludes unvested restricted stock because there is no exercise price associated with these equity awards. |
| |
| (3) | All of the shares of common stock that remain available for future issuance under the Kforce Inc. 2006 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plans may be issued in connection with options, warrants, rights and restricted stock awards. Each future grant of options or stock appreciation rights shall reduce the available shares under the Kforce Inc. 2006 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plans by an equal amount while each future grant of restricted stock shall reduce the available shares by 1.58 shares for each share awarded. In order to maximize our share reserves, the prevailing practice over the last few years has been for Kforce to issue full value awards as opposed to options and stock appreciation rights. |
| |
| (4) | As of December 31, 2013,2014, there were options outstanding under the Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2009 ESPP”) to purchase 8,3926,644 shares of common stock at a discounted purchase price of $19.44.$22.92. |
| |
| (5) | Issuances of options under the Incentive Stock Option Plan ceased in 2005. TheAll of the outstanding options issued pursuant to this plan will expire at various times throughin March 2015. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table presents information with respect to our repurchases of Kforce common stock during the three months ended December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1) | | | Average Price Paid
per Share | | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(1) | | | Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs | |
October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 63,306,649 | |
November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013 | | | 37,944 | | | $ | 19.96 | | | | 37,944 | | | $ | 62,549,325 | |
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 62,549,325 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 37,944 | | | $ | 19.96 | | | | 37,944 | | | $ | 62,549,325 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1) (2) | | Average Price Paid
per Share | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(1) | | Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs |
| October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014 | 992,211 |
| | $ | 20.57 |
| | 992,211 |
| | $ | 51,647,241 |
|
| November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014 | 490,162 |
| | $ | 23.47 |
| | 490,162 |
| | $ | 40,142,579 |
|
| December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 | 452,802 |
| | $ | 23.83 |
| | 439,703 |
| | $ | 29,663,527 |
|
| Total | 1,935,175 |
| | $ | 22.07 |
| | 1,922,076 |
| | $ | 29,663,527 |
|
| |
| (1) | All of the shares reported aboveconstitute shares repurchased in the open market as purchased are attributable topart of the Firm’s share repurchase authorization and shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining toas a result of the vesting of restricted stock. |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
| (2) | Includes 13,099 shares of stock received upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding requirements for the period December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with the information within Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 (1)(2) | | | 2012 (3)(4) | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) | |
Net service revenues | | $ | 1,151,887 | | | $ | 1,082,479 | | | $ | 1,004,747 | | | $ | 886,657 | | | $ | 802,108 | |
Gross profit | | | 369,612 | | | | 347,933 | | | | 317,747 | | | | 283,846 | | | | 257,230 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 323,933 | | | | 322,436 | | | | 274,072 | | | | 251,156 | | | | 238,365 | |
Goodwill impairment | | | 14,510 | | | | 69,158 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,846 | | | | 10,789 | | | | 12,505 | | | | 12,589 | | | | 11,673 | |
Other expense, net | | | 1,225 | | | | 1,116 | | | | 1,256 | | | | 1,236 | | | | 1,085 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | 20,098 | | | | (55,566 | ) | | | 29,914 | | | | 18,865 | | | | 6,107 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 9,311 | | | | (19,854 | ) | | | 10,858 | | | | 6,869 | | | | 2,684 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 10,787 | | | | (35,712 | ) | | | 19,056 | | | | 11,996 | | | | 3,423 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | | — | | | | 22,009 | | | | 8,100 | | | | 8,638 | | | | 9,450 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | 27,156 | | | $ | 20,634 | | | $ | 12,873 | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic, continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.50 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.09 | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted, continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.49 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.09 | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.72 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.33 | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.33 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | | | 33,511 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 37,835 | | | | 39,480 | | | | 38,485 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | | | 33,643 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 38,831 | | | | 40,503 | | | | 39,330 | |
Cash dividend declared per share | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| |
| | | As of December 31, | |
| | | 2013 (1)(2) | | | 2012 (3)(4) | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | (IN THOUSANDS) | |
Working capital | | $ | 112,913 | | | $ | 72,685 | | | $ | 103,075 | | | $ | 64,878 | | | $ | 57,924 | |
Total assets | | $ | 347,768 | | | $ | 325,149 | | | $ | 409,672 | | | $ | 391,044 | | | $ | 339,825 | |
Total outstanding borrowings – Credit Facility | | $ | 62,642 | | | $ | 21,000 | | | $ | 49,526 | | | $ | 10,825 | | | $ | 3,000 | |
Total long-term liabilities | | $ | 100,562 | | | $ | 56,429 | | | $ | 93,393 | | | $ | 36,904 | | | $ | 33,887 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 157,233 | | | $ | 169,846 | | | $ | 233,115 | | | $ | 253,817 | | | $ | 226,725 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 (1) | | 2013 (2)(3) | | 2012 (4)(5) | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) |
| Net service revenues | $ | 1,217,331 |
| | $ | 1,073,728 |
| | $ | 1,005,487 |
| | $ | 936,036 |
| | $ | 828,895 |
|
| Gross profit | 374,581 |
| | 344,376 |
| | 320,586 |
| | 293,271 |
| | 263,999 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 315,338 |
| | 307,944 |
| | 305,940 |
| | 258,578 |
| | 239,400 |
|
| Goodwill impairment | — |
| | 14,510 |
| | 69,158 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,894 |
| | 9,846 |
| | 10,789 |
| | 12,505 |
| | 12,611 |
|
| Other expense, net | 1,392 |
| | 1,147 |
| | 1,057 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 811 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | 47,957 |
| | 10,929 |
| | (66,358 | ) | | 20,968 |
| | 11,177 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 18,559 |
| | 5,635 |
| | (24,227 | ) | | 7,339 |
| | 3,447 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 29,398 |
| | 5,294 |
| | (42,131 | ) | | 13,629 |
| | 7,730 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 61,517 |
| | 5,493 |
| | 28,428 |
| | 13,527 |
| | 12,904 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 90,915 |
| | $ | 10,787 |
| | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | 27,156 |
| | $ | 20,634 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic, continuing operations | $ | 0.94 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) | | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted, continuing operations | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) | | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.19 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic | $ | 2.89 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 31,475 |
| | 33,511 |
| | 35,791 |
| | 37,835 |
| | 39,480 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 31,691 |
| | 33,643 |
| | 35,791 |
| | 38,831 |
| | 40,503 |
|
| Cash dividend declared per share | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | As of December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (IN THOUSANDS) |
| Working capital | $ | 130,226 |
| | $ | 112,913 |
| | $ | 72,685 |
| | $ | 103,075 |
| | $ | 64,878 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 363,922 |
| | $ | 347,768 |
| | $ | 325,149 |
| | $ | 409,672 |
| | $ | 391,044 |
|
| Total outstanding borrowings – Credit Facility | $ | 93,333 |
| | $ | 62,642 |
| | $ | 21,000 |
| | $ | 49,526 |
| | $ | 10,825 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | $ | 130,351 |
| | $ | 100,562 |
| | $ | 56,429 |
| | $ | 93,393 |
| | $ | 36,904 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | $ | 139,388 |
| | $ | 157,233 |
| | $ | 169,846 |
| | $ | 233,115 |
| | $ | 253,817 |
|
| |
| (1) | During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce terminated the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Health Plan ("SERHP") and settled all future benefit obligations by making lump sum payments totaling approximately $3.9 million, which resulted in a net settlement loss of approximately $0.7 million. The termination effectively removed Kforce's related post-retirement benefit obligation. |
| |
| (2) | Kforce recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $14.5 million related to the GS reporting unit during 2013. The tax benefit associated with this impairment charge was $5.2 million, resulting in an after-tax impairment charge of $9.3 million. |
(2) | |
| (3) | During the three months ended December 31, 2013, Kforce commenced a plan to streamline its leadership and support-related structure to better align a higher percentage of personnel in roles that are closest to the customer through an organizational realignment. As a result of the organizational realignment, Kforce incurred severance and termination-related expenses of $7.1 million during 2013 which were recorded within selling, general and administrative expense. Additionally, in connection with the realignment and succession planning, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses of $3.6 million paid to a broad group of senior management during the fourth quarter of 2013. |
(3) | |
| (4) | Kforce recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $69.2 million related to the GS reporting unit during 2012. The tax benefit associated with this impairment charge was $24.7 million, resulting in an after-tax impairment charge of $44.5 million. |
(4) | |
| (5) | In connection with the disposition of Kforce Clinical Research, Inc. (“KCR”), as described below, the Board exercised its discretion, as permitted within the Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, to accelerate the vesting, for tax planning purposes, of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and alternative long-term incentive (“ALTI”) awards on March 31, 2012, which resulted in the acceleration of $31.3 million of compensation expense and payroll taxes recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012. |
During the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce disposed of Kforce Healthcare, Inc. (“KHI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kforce Inc. and operator of the former Health Information Management (“HIM”) reporting segment, for a total cash purchase price of $119.0 million plus a $96 thousand post-closing working capital adjustment. The results of operations for KHI have been presented as discontinued operations for all of the years presented above. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Kforce disposed of KCR for a purchase price of $50.0 million plus a $7.3 million post-closing working capital adjustment.
As a result, theThe results of operations of KCR have been presented as discontinued operations for
each yearthe years 2012, 2011 and 2010 presented above. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations”
in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This section
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand Kforce, our operations, and our present business environment. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report, as well as Item 1. Business of this report for an overview of our operations and business environment.
This overview summarizes the MD&A, which includes the following sections:
| • | | Executive Summary –Executive Summary –an executive summary of our results of operations for 2014. Critical Accounting Estimates – a discussion of the accounting estimates that are most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. New Accounting Standards – a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and their potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Results of Operations – an analysis of Kforce’s consolidated results of operations for the three years presented in its consolidated financial statements. In order to assist the reader in understanding our business as a whole, certain metrics are presented for each of our segments. Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of cash flows, off-balance sheet arrangements, stock repurchases and contractual obligations and commitments and the impact of changes in interest rates on our business. Effective August 3, 2014, Kforce divested its HIM segment through a sale of our results of operations for 2013. |
| • | | Critical Accounting Estimates – a discussion of the accounting estimates that are most critical to fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. |
| • | | New Accounting Standards – a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and their potential impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| • | | Results of Operations – an analysis of Kforce’s consolidated results of operations for the three years presented in its Consolidated Financial Statements. In order to assist the reader in understanding our business as a whole, certain metrics are presented for each of our segments. |
| • | | Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of cash flows, off-balance sheet arrangements, stock repurchases and contractual obligations and commitments and the impact of changes in interest rates on our business. |
On March 31, 2012, Kforce sold all of the issued and outstanding stock of KCR. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this annual report.KHI. The results presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include activity relating to HIM as discontinued operations.
On March 31, 2012, Kforce sold all of the issued and 2011 includeoutstanding stock of KCR. The results presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes activity relating to KCR as discontinued operations. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Except as specifically noted, our discussions below exclude any activity related to
HIM and KCR, which
isare addressed separately in the discussion of
incomeIncome from
discontinued operations, netDiscontinued Operations, Net of
income taxes.Income Taxes.
The following is an executive summary of what Kforce believes are important
20132014 highlights, which should be considered in the context of the additional discussions herein and in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and notes thereto. We believe such highlights are as follows:
Net service revenues increased 6.4%13.4% to $1.15$1.22 billion in 20132014 from $1.08$1.07 billion in 2012.2013. Net service revenues increased 9.4%13.9% for Tech, 1.7%14.2% for FA 1.5% for HIM, and 0.6%6.6% for GS.
Flex revenues increased 6.6%14.2% to $1.10$1.17 billion in 20132014 from $1.03 billion in 2012.2013.
Search revenues increased 2.5%decreased 3.6% to $48.9$46.7 million in 20132014 from $47.7$48.4 million in 2012.2013.
Quarterly sequential revenues grew for threefour consecutive quarters, driving Q4 revenue growth in the fourth quarter of 2014 to 12.3%13.0% year over year.
Flex gross profit margin increased 10decreased 90 basis points to 29.1%28.0% in 20132014 from 29.0%28.9% in 2012.2013. Flex gross profit margin increased 30decreased 60 basis points for Tech, and 270 basis points for GS and decreased 2070 basis points for FA and 320310 basis points for HIMGS year over year.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A&A") expenses as a percentage of revenues for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was 28.1%25.9% compared to 29.8%28.7% in 2012.2013. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the acceleration of substantially all long-term incentive awards (“LTIs”) on March 31, 2012, which resulted in the acceleration of $31.3 million of compensation expense and payroll taxes recorded in 2012. The reduction in SG&A was partially offsetorganizational realignment executed by the investment in revenue generator headcount in the fourth quarter of 2012 and throughout 2013 and the severance and termination-related charge and Compensation Committee approved bonuses of $7.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, incurredFirm during the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as a resultdecrease in the annual effective commission rate due to certain changes made to our compensation plan.
Income from continuing operations of the Firm’s organizational realignment plan.
Net$29.4 million in 2014 increased $24.1 million compared with income from continuing operations of $10.8 million for 2013 increased $46.5 million from a net loss from continuing operations of $35.7$5.3 million in 2012.2013. The results for 2013 include an after-tax goodwill impairment charge of $9.3 million.
Net income of $90.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $80.1 million as well asfrom net income of $10.8 million for the previously mentioned organizational realignment charges. The results for 2012 include an after-tax goodwill impairment charge of $44.5 million as well as the previously mentioned acceleration of LTIs during 2012.year ended December 31, 2013.
EarningsDiluted earnings per share from continuing operations for 2013 was $0.32 comparedthe year ended December 31, 2014 increased to a loss per share of $1.00$0.93 from $0.16 per share in 2012.2013.
During 2013,the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce Inc. sold all of the issued and outstanding stock of KHI, operator of the former HIM reporting segment, for a total cash purchase price of $119.0 million, plus a post-closing working capital adjustment of $96 thousand. Proceeds from the sale of HIM were primarily used initially to pay off the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and ultimately to repurchase shares of common stock.
During 2014, Kforce repurchased 1.84.8 million shares of common stock on the open market at a total cost of approximately $27.3$101.6 million.
The Firm amended its Credit Facility in December 2013 to increase borrowing capacity by $35.0 million to $135.0 million.
The Firm initiated a quarterly dividend program and declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.10dividends totaling $0.41 per share induring the fourth quarter of 2013year ended December 31, 2014 resulting in a payout in cash of $3.3$12.8 million.
The Firm amended its credit facility on December 23, 2014 to increase the borrowing capacity by $35.0 million to $170.0 million, and to increase the accordion option from $15.0 million to $50.0 million.
The total amount outstanding under the Credit Facilitycredit facility increased $41.6$30.7 million to $93.3 million as of December 31, 2014 as compared to $62.6 million as of December 31, 2013, as comparedprimarily due to $21.0 million asfunds used to repurchase shares of December 31, 2012.our common stock.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements,consolidated financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends, and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, estimates, assumptions and judgments to ensure that our
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”
in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Fallouts and Other Accounts Receivable Reserves | | | | |
| | |
See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” toin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of our policies related to determining our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves. | | Kforce performs an ongoing analysis of factors including recent write-off and delinquency trends, changes in economic conditions, a specific analysis of material accounts receivable balances that are past due, and concentration of accounts receivable among clients, in establishing its allowance for doubtful accounts. Kforce estimates its allowance for Search fallouts based on our historical experience with the actual occurrence of fallouts. Kforce estimates its reserve for future revenue adjustments (e.g. bill rate adjustments, time card adjustments, early pay discounts) based on our historical experience. | | We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, these allowances were 1.0% and 2012, the allowance was 1.1% and 1.4% as a percentage of gross accounts receivable, respectively. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves. However, if our estimates regarding estimated accounts receivable losses are inaccurate, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% difference in actual accounts receivable losses reserved at December 31, 2013,2014, would have impacted our net income for 20132014 by approximately $0.1 million. |
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Goodwill Impairment | | | | |
| | |
We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. See Note 6 – “Goodwill“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” toAssets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the valuation methodologies employed.During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce management made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment, which is ultimately expected to have a negative impact on near-term growth prospects and result in a moderate reduction in revenues and profitability over the next few years. As a result of the strategic decision, we believe there was a triggering event during the fourth quarter.
In connection with our annual assessment of goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2014 we performed a step one and step two analysis for each of our reporting units, which ultimately resulted in anno impairment charge of $14.5 million in our GS reporting unit.for Tech, FA or GS. The carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 20132014 by reporting unit was approximately $17.0 million, $8.0 million $4.9 million and $19.0$20.9 million for our Tech, FA HIM and GS reporting units, respectively. | | We determine the fair value of our reporting units using widely accepted valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow, guideline transaction method and guideline company method. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make significant assumptions and judgments including: (i)(1) an appropriate rate to discount the expected future cash flows, (ii)flows; (2) the inherent risk in achieving forecasted operating results, (iii)results; (3) long-term growth rates, (iv)rates; (4) expectations for future economic cycles, (v)cycles; (5) market comparable companies and appropriate adjustments thereto and (vi)(6) market multiples. It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of present industry and economic conditions, as well as future expectations. | | For
Kforce performed a step one impairment assessment for each of our Tech and FA reporting units Kforce assessed(Tech, FA and GS) as of December 31, 2014. We compared the qualitative factorscarrying value of each reporting unit to determine if it was more likely than notthe respective estimated fair value as of December 31, 2014 and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. Based upon the qualitative assessments, it was determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units were less than the carrying values.For our HIM and GS reporting units, however, a quantitative step one impairment assessment was performed as of December 31, 2013. For the HIM reporting unit, the step one analysis resulted in the fair value exceeding theexceeded carrying value of invested capital by $19.3 million, or 156%. Due to the reductions in the forecasted revenues for the GS reporting unit, the step one analysis indicated potential impairment as the carrying value of invested capital exceeded the fair value.
263%, 342% and 7%, respectively. As a result, of the potentialno goodwill impairment indication for the GS reporting unit, a step two analysis was performed, resulting in a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.5 million forcharges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013. 2014. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, we recorded an impairment charge to the GS reporting unit goodwill balance. As the current fair value of the GS reporting unit exceeds the carrying value by 7%, the following is a discussion regarding certain of the assumptions utilized in the step one impairment analysis for GS as of December 31, 2014. Consistent with the 2013 Step 2 analysis, a terminal value growth rate of 3% and a weighted average cost of capital of 17%, which includes a specific company risk premium of 2%, was used. To calculate fair value under the guideline company method, we utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.3x to 0.7x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 3.0x to 6.9x. Additionally, the fair value under the guideline company method included a control premium of 35.0%, which was determined based on a review of comparative market transactions. To calculate the fair value under the guideline transaction method, we utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.3x to 2.3x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 7.6x to 20.8x. A deterioration in any of these assumptions or the assumptions discussed in Note 6 – “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” toin the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could result in an additional impairment charge. |
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Self-Insured Liabilities | | | | |
| | |
We are self-insured for certain losses related to health insurance and workers’ compensation claims. However, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to these claims. When estimating our self-insured liabilities, we consider a number of factors, including historical claims experience, plan structure, internal claims management activities, demographic factors and severity factors. Periodically, management reviews its assumptions to determine the adequacy of our self-insured liabilities. Our liabilities for health insurance and workers’ compensation claims as of December 31, 20132014 were $3.0$3.4 million and $1.7$1.9 million, respectively. | | Our self-insured liabilities contain uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the ultimate total cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) as of the balance sheet date. | | We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodologies used to establish our self-insured liabilities during the past three fiscal years.2014 and 2013. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insured liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our self-insured liabilities related to health insurance and workers’ compensation as of December 31, 20132014 would have impacted our net income for 20132014 by approximately $0.3 million. |
| | |
Description
| | |
| Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Stock-Based Compensation | | | | |
| | |
We have stock-based compensation programs, which include options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and unvested share awards and an employeerestricted stock purchase plan.awards. See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” Note 1211 – “Employee Benefit Plans,” and Note 1413 – “Stock Incentive Plans” toin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. We have not granted any stock options or SARs over the last three years. We determine the fair market value of our restricted stock based on the closing stock price of Kforce’s common stock on the date of grant. We utilize a Monte Carlo model to determine the derived service period for any restricted stock which contain a market vesting condition. | | Restricted stock which contain a market vesting condition require management to make assumptions regarding the likelihood of achieving market conditions during the vesting period, which are inherently difficult to estimate but are modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The stock compensation expense recorded is impacted by our estimated forfeiture rates, which are based on historical forfeitures, as well as historical employee turnover. | | We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material or the stock-based compensation expense reported in our financial statements may not be representative of the actual economic cost of the stock-based compensation.
A 10% change in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense would have impacted our net income by $0.5$0.7 million for 2013.2014. |
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Defined Benefit Pension Plan – U.S. | | | | |
| | |
We have a defined benefit pension plan that benefits certain named executive officers, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and a defined benefit postretirement health plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Health Plan (“SERHP”). See Note 1211 – “Employee Benefit Plans” toin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the terms of these plans.Neither thethis plan.
The SERP or SERHP werewas not funded as of December 31, 20132014 or 2012.2013. | | When estimating the obligation for our pension and postretirement benefit plans,plan, management is required to make certain assumptions and to apply judgment with respect to determining an appropriate discount rate, bonus percentage assumptions expected health care and premium cost trends, applicability of health care regulations and expected effect of future compensation increases for the participants in the plans, as they apply to our plans.plan. | | We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our obligation. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in the discount rate used to measure the net periodic pension cost for the SERP and SERHP during 20132014 would have had an insignificant impact on our net income for 2013.2014. |
| | |
Description
| | |
| Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Differ From Assumptions |
Accounting for Income Taxes | | | | |
| | |
See Note 4 – “Income Taxes” toin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the components of Kforce’s income tax expense, as well as the temporary differences that exist as of December 31, 2013.2014. | | Our consolidated effective income tax rate is influenced by tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions, including those that may be uncertain. Kforce is also required to exercise judgment with respect to the realization of our net deferred tax assets. Management evaluates all positive and negative evidence and exercises judgment regarding past and future events to determine if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. If appropriate, a valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets to offset future tax benefits that may not be realized. | | We do not believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in our liability for uncertain income tax positions or our effective income tax rate. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses that could be material. Kforce recorded a valuation allowance of $0.1 million as of December 31, 20132014 related primarily to state net operating losses. A 0.50% change in our effective income tax rate from continuing operations would have impacted our net income for 20132014 by approximately $0.1$0.2 million. |
In July 2013,August 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding presentationdisclosure of uncertainties about an unrecognized tax benefitentity’s ability to continue as a going concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. This guidance is to be applied for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter, and early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate a material impact to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers, which specifies that revenue should be recognized when
a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss,promised goods or
a tax credit carryforward exists.services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15,
2013,2016 and interim periods within those annual
periods.periods and will require enhanced disclosures. Kforce
doesis currently evaluating the potential impact of the accounting and disclosure requirements on the consolidated financial statements; we do not
expect the adoption of this guidance to havecurrently anticipate a material impact
on its futureto the consolidated financial
statements.statements upon adoption.
In April 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity, which specifies additional thresholds for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. Kforce elected not to adopt this standard early.
Net service revenues for the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
and 2011 were
$1.15approximately $1.22 billion,
$1.08$1.07 billion and
$1.00$1.01 billion, respectively, which represents an increase of
6.4%13.4% from 2013 to 2014 and 6.8% from 2012 to
2013. The increase in 2014 from 2013
was primarily due to our Tech segment (which represented 69.2% of total net service revenues in 2014) and
7.7% from 2011 to 2012.our FA segment (which represented 22.7% of total net service revenues in 2014) which had increases in net service revenues of 13.9% and 14.2%, respectively. The increase in 2013 from 2012 was primarily due to our Tech segment
(which represented 68.9% of total net service revenues in 2013) which had an increase in net service revenues of 9.4%
and represented 64.2% of our total net service revenues in 2013. The increase in 2012 from 2011 was primarily due to our Tech and FA segments, which had increases in net service revenues of 8.3% and 8.6%, respectively and represented 62.4% and 22.0%, respectively, of our net service revenues in 2012. In addition, net service revenues for HIM increased 1.5% in 2013 from 2012 and 12.1% in 2012 from 2011.. Our GS segment net service revenues increased
6.6% in 2014 from 2013 and increased 0.6% in 2013 from
2012 and decreased 1.1% in 2012 from 2011.2012. Search revenues
decreased 3.6% in 2014 compared to 2013 and increased
2.5%2.6% in 2013 compared to
2012 and 9.6% in 2012 compared to 2011.2012.
Flex gross profit margins
increased 10decreased 90 basis points to
29.1%28.0% for the year ended December 31,
2013 from 29.0%2014 as compared to 28.9% for the year ended December 31,
2012.2013. The decrease is due primarily to the impact of a change in spread between our bill rates and pay rates as a result of higher concentration of our revenue growth coming from larger, lower-margin profile clients and an increase in benefit costs. Flex gross profit margins increased from 28.5% for the year ended December 31,
20112012 to
29.0%28.9% for the year ended December 31,
2012 due primarily to an increase in the spread between our bill and pay rates.2013. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net service revenues were
28.1%25.9% and
29.8%28.7% for the years ended December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively. The decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net service revenues during the year ended December 31,
20132014 was primarily
driven by a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the
acceleration of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and ALTI awards on March 31, 2012, which resulted in the acceleration of $31.3 million of compensation expense and payroll taxes recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in 2013 was partially offsetorganizational realignment executed by the
investment in revenue generator headcount additions during the fourth quarter of 2012 and throughout 2013 and severance and termination-related charges of $7.1 million incurredFirm during the fourth quarter of 2013
as a result ofand partially offset by the
Firm’s organizational realignment plan.increase in benefit costs mentioned previously.
Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, Kforce recorded a goodwill impairment charge
in the amount of $14.5 million and $69.2 million, respectively, in our GS reporting unit. In 2013,
the goodwillthis impairment charge was a result of a business strategy decision made during the fourth quarter
of 2013, regarding the GS reporting unit, to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services.
As a result of the change in focus, management plans to reallocate existing investments in the business and redirect the business development team to concentrate on a more specific and, in our opinion, a higher quality revenue stream. These plans will ultimately result in the transition away from certain existing revenue streams, specific revenue-generating contracts and opportunities in the business development life cycle that do not fit within the revised strategic scope of service offerings, including pure staff augmentation as well as product sales. We expect that the change in strategy, coupled with the lengthy contract procurement cycle within the government sector of approximately 18 months for solution-based contracts, will have a negative impact on near-term growth prospects of the GS segment and that GS will experience a moderate reduction in revenues and profitability over the next few years. This reduction in the forecast was the primary driver for the impairment charge during the fourth quarter of 2013. During 2012, the goodwill impairment charge was the result of the adverse effect of the unexpected significant delays in the start-up of already executed and funded projects, uncertainty of funding levels of various Federal Government programs and agencies and the increasingly uncertain macro-economic and political environment.
From an economic standpoint, temporary employment figures and trends are important indicators of staffing demand, which
improvedcontinued to improve during
20132014 as compared to
20122013 based on data published by the
BLS.BLS and SIA. Total temporary employment increased
9.6%7.8% and the penetration rate
(the percentage of temporary staffing to total employment) increased
8.4%3.4% from December
20122013 to December
2013,2014, bringing the rate to
2.06%2.13% in December
2013,2014, an all-time high. While the macro-employment picture remains uncertain, it has continuously improved, with the unemployment rate at
6.7%5.6% as of December
2013,2014, and non-farm payroll expanding an average of
182,000246,000 jobs per month in
2013.2014. Also, the college-level unemployment rate, which
we believe serves as a proxy for professional employment and is more closely aligned with the Firm’s business strategy, was at
3.3%2.9% in December
2013. Kforce2014. Management believes that uncertainty in the overall U.S. economic outlook related to the political landscape, potential tax changes, geo-political risk and impact of health care reform, will continue to fuel growth in temporary staffing as employers may be reluctant to increase full-time hiring.
Additionally, we believe the increasing costs of employment may be driving a systemic shift to an increased use of temporary staff as a percentage of total workforce, which is creating reduced cyclicality in the business. If the penetration rate of temporary staffing continues to experience growth in the coming
months and years, we believe that our Flex revenues can grow significantly even in a relatively modest growth macro-economic environment. Kforce remains optimistic about the growth prospects of the temporary staffing industry, the penetration rate, and in particular, our revenue portfolio.
During 2013 and over
Over the last few years, we have undertaken several significant initiatives including:
(i)(1) executing a realignment plan to streamline our leadership and revenue enablers in an effort to better align a higher percentage of roles closer to the customer;
(ii)(2) increasing our focus on consultant care processes and communications to redeploy our consultants in a timely fashion;
(iii)(3) increasing revenue generator headcount to capitalize on targeted growth opportunities;
(iv)(4) further optimizing our NRC team in support of our field operations;
(v) upgradingand (5) divesting of our
corporate systems with a focus on business intelligence, compensation management, job order prioritizationnon-core businesses, HIM and
the development of mobile applications; (vi) focusing on process improvement, centralization and technology infrastructure and (vii) divesting KCR in March 2012 in an attempt to enhance Kforce’s focus on our core service offerings.KCR. We believe our realigned field operations and
back officerevenue enabler operations models provide a competitive advantage for us and are keys to our future growth and profitability. We also believe that our portfolio of service offerings, which are
primarilyalmost exclusively in the U.S., are also a key contributor to our long-term financial stability.
We believe the recent divestitures of HIM and KCR provide us the opportunity to further dedicate our resources to exclusively providing technology and finance & accounting talent in the commercial and government markets through our staffing organization and KGS, our government solutions provider.
Net Service Revenues. The following table sets forth, as a percentage of net service revenues, certain items in our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Revenues by Segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tech | | | 64.2 | % | | | 62.4 | % | | | 62.1 | % |
FA | | | 21.0 | | | | 22.0 | | | | 21.9 | |
HIM | | | 6.8 | | | | 7.1 | | | | 6.8 | |
GS | | | 8.0 | | | | 8.5 | | | | 9.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues by Type: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flex | | | 95.8 | % | | | 95.6 | % | | | 95.7 | % |
Search | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.4 | | | | 4.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 32.1 | % | | | 32.1 | % | | | 31.6 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 28.1 | % | | | 29.8 | % | | | 27.3 | % |
Goodwill impairment | | | 1.3 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 0.9 | % | | | 1.0 | % | | | 1.2 | % |
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | 1.7 | % | | | (5.1 | )% | | | 3.0 | % |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 0.9 | % | | | (3.3 | )% | | | 1.9 | % |
Net income (loss) | | | 0.9 | % | | | (1.3 | )% | | | 2.7 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Revenues by Segment: | | | | | |
| Tech | 69.2 | % | | 68.9 | % | | 67.2 | % |
| FA | 22.7 |
| | 22.6 |
| | 23.7 |
|
| GS | 8.1 |
| | 8.5 |
| | 9.1 |
|
| Net service revenues | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Revenues by Type: | | | | | |
| Flex | 96.2 | % | | 95.5 | % | | 95.3 | % |
| Search | 3.8 |
| | 4.5 |
| | 4.7 |
|
| Net service revenues | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Gross profit | 30.8 | % | | 32.1 | % | | 31.9 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 25.9 | % | | 28.7 | % | | 30.4 | % |
| Goodwill impairment | — | % | | 1.4 | % | | 6.9 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | 0.8 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 1.1 | % |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | 3.9 | % | | 1.0 | % | | (6.6 | )% |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 2.4 | % | | 0.5 | % | | (4.2 | )% |
| Net income (loss) | 7.5 | % | | 1.0 | % | | (1.4 | )% |
The following table details net service revenues for Flex and Search
revenues by segment and changes from the prior
year. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in $000’s) | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flex | | $ | 720,179 | | | | 9.9 | % | | $ | 655,062 | | | | 8.1 | % | | $ | 606,238 | |
Search | | | 19,183 | | | | (6.5 | %) | | | 20,525 | | | | 15.5 | % | | | 17,774 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Tech | | $ | 739,362 | | | | 9.4 | % | | $ | 675,587 | | | | 8.3 | % | | $ | 624,012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flex | | $ | 213,158 | | | | 0.6 | % | | $ | 211,797 | | | | 9.0 | % | | $ | 194,359 | |
Search | | | 29,259 | | | | 9.7 | % | | | 26,679 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 25,216 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total FA | | $ | 242,417 | | | | 1.7 | % | | $ | 238,476 | | | | 8.6 | % | | $ | 219,575 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HIM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flex | | $ | 77,745 | | | | 1.6 | % | | $ | 76,517 | | | | 12.2 | % | | $ | 68,181 | |
Search | | | 414 | | | | (12.8 | )% | | | 475 | | | | (10.4 | )% | | | 530 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total HIM | | $ | 78,159 | | | | 1.5 | % | | $ | 76,992 | | | | 12.1 | % | | $ | 68,711 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flex | | $ | 91,949 | | | | 0.6 | % | | $ | 91,424 | | | | (1.1 | )% | | $ | 92,449 | |
Search | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total GS | | $ | 91,949 | | | | 0.6 | % | | $ | 91,424 | | | | (1.1 | )% | | $ | 92,449 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Flex | | $ | 1,103,031 | | | | 6.6 | % | | $ | 1,034,800 | | | | 7.7 | % | | $ | 961,227 | |
Total Search | | | 48,856 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 47,679 | | | | 9.6 | % | | | 43,520 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Net Service Revenues | | $ | 1,151,887 | | | | 6.4 | % | | $ | 1,082,479 | | | | 7.7 | % | | $ | 1,004,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year (in thousands).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | | | | | | | | | |
| Flex | $ | 823,311 |
| | 14.3 | % | | $ | 720,179 |
| | 9.9 | % | | $ | 655,062 |
|
| Search | 19,158 |
| | (0.1 | )% | | 19,183 |
| | (6.5 | )% | | 20,525 |
|
| Total Tech | $ | 842,469 |
| | 13.9 | % | | $ | 739,362 |
| | 9.4 | % | | $ | 675,587 |
|
| FA | | | | | | | | | |
| Flex | $ | 249,274 |
| | 16.9 | % | | $ | 213,158 |
| | 0.6 | % | | $ | 211,797 |
|
| Search | 27,537 |
| | (5.9 | )% | | 29,259 |
| | 9.7 | % | | 26,679 |
|
| Total FA | $ | 276,811 |
| | 14.2 | % | | $ | 242,417 |
| | 1.7 | % | | $ | 238,476 |
|
| GS | | | | | | | | | |
| Flex | $ | 98,051 |
| | 6.6 | % | | $ | 91,949 |
| | 0.6 | % | | $ | 91,424 |
|
| Search | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total GS | $ | 98,051 |
| | 6.6 | % | | $ | 91,949 |
| | 0.6 | % | | $ | 91,424 |
|
| Total Flex | $ | 1,170,636 |
| | 14.2 | % | | $ | 1,025,286 |
| | 7.0 | % | | $ | 958,283 |
|
| Total Search | 46,695 |
| | (3.6 | )% | | 48,442 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 47,204 |
|
| Total Net Service Revenues | $ | 1,217,331 |
| | 13.4 | % | | $ | 1,073,728 |
| | 6.8 | % | | $ | 1,005,487 |
|
While quarterly comparisons are not fully discussed herein, certain quarterly revenue trends are referred to in discussing annual comparisons. Our quarterly operating results are affected by the number of billing days in a quarter, which is provided in the table below. The following
20132014 quarterly information is presented for informational purposes
only. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended | |
(in $000’s, except Billing Days) | | December 31 | | | September 30 | | | June 30 | | | March 31 | |
Billing Days | | | 62 | | | | 64 | | | | 64 | | | | 63 | |
Flex Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tech | | $ | 193,238 | | | $ | 188,888 | | | $ | 175,213 | | | $ | 162,840 | |
FA | | | 55,552 | | | | 54,791 | | | | 52,954 | | | | 49,861 | |
HIM | | | 20,678 | | | | 19,602 | | | | 18,921 | | | | 18,544 | |
GS | | | 21,695 | | | | 24,127 | | | | 23,297 | | | | 22,830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Flex | | $ | 291,163 | | | $ | 287,408 | | | $ | 270,385 | | | $ | 254,075 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Search Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tech | | $ | 4,338 | | | $ | 4,694 | | | $ | 5,356 | | | $ | 4,795 | |
FA | | | 7,238 | | | | 7,456 | | | | 7,900 | | | | 6,665 | |
HIM | | | 180 | | | | 94 | | | | 48 | | | | 92 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Search | | $ | 11,756 | | | $ | 12,244 | | | $ | 13,304 | | | $ | 11,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tech | | $ | 197,576 | | | $ | 193,582 | | | $ | 180,569 | | | $ | 167,635 | |
FA | | | 62,790 | | | | 62,247 | | | | 60,854 | | | | 56,526 | |
HIM | | | 20,858 | | | | 19,696 | | | | 18,969 | | | | 18,636 | |
GS | | | 21,695 | | | | 24,127 | | | | 23,297 | | | | 22,830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | | $ | 302,919 | | | $ | 299,652 | | | $ | 283,689 | | | $ | 265,627 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
only (in thousands, except Billing Days).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | December 31 | | September 30 | | June 30 | | March 31 |
| Billing Days | 62 |
| | 64 |
| | 64 |
| | 63 |
|
| Flex Revenues | | | | | | | |
| Tech | $ | 212,414 |
| | $ | 212,269 |
| | $ | 206,165 |
| | $ | 192,463 |
|
| FA | 67,863 |
| | 64,254 |
| | 60,057 |
| | 57,100 |
|
| GS | 26,547 |
| | 24,787 |
| | 23,946 |
| | 22,771 |
|
| Total Flex | $ | 306,824 |
| | $ | 301,310 |
| | $ | 290,168 |
| | $ | 272,334 |
|
| Search Revenues | | | | | | | |
| Tech | $ | 4,740 |
| | $ | 5,374 |
| | $ | 5,036 |
| | $ | 4,008 |
|
| FA | 7,175 |
| | 7,126 |
| | 7,554 |
| | 5,682 |
|
| Total Search | $ | 11,915 |
| | $ | 12,500 |
| | $ | 12,590 |
| | $ | 9,690 |
|
| Total Revenues | | | | | | | |
| Tech | $ | 217,154 |
| | $ | 217,643 |
| | $ | 211,201 |
| | $ | 196,471 |
|
| FA | 75,038 |
| | 71,380 |
| | 67,611 |
| | 62,782 |
|
| GS | 26,547 |
| | 24,787 |
| | 23,946 |
| | 22,771 |
|
| Total Revenues | $ | 318,739 |
| | $ | 313,810 |
| | $ | 302,758 |
| | $ | 282,024 |
|
Flex Revenues. The primary drivers of Flex revenues are the number of consultant hours worked, the consultant bill rate per hour and, to a limited extent, the amount of billable expenses incurred by Kforce. Flex revenues for our largest segment, Tech, increased
9.9%14.3% during the year ended December 31,
20132014 as compared to
20122013 and increased
8.1%9.9% in
20122013 from
2011.2012. We believe the increase in revenue is primarily a result of candidate skill sets that are in demand, our great people and operating model, and our increase in revenue generator headcount. According to an IT growth update published by SIA during the fourth quarter of
2013,2014, industries that utilized IT staffing are estimated to grow at a higher rate than the overall U.S. employment growth rate. SIA estimates the IT staffing market will grow 7% in 2014
and an additional 7% in 2015, which we believe is due to the continuing use of temporary staffing as a solution during uncertain economic cycles, the increasing cost of employment driving the systemic use of temporary staffing, particularly in project-based work such as technology, and an increasing influence of technology
and an increasing influence of technology in business driving up the overall demand for Tech talent. SIA also acknowledges that notable skill shortages in certain technology skill sets will continue, which we believe will result in strong future growth in our Tech segment.
In an effortThe Firm believes it is well-positioned to take advantage of this
continuedgrowth, as a result of the expected
growth,increase in productivity, which normally comes with tenure, of the revenue generator headcount
focused onadded over the past few years. Additionally, the Firm expects to continue to make selective investments in revenue generator headcount into 2015. The Firm believes the Tech
was significantly increased year-over-year. Kforce’s operating model includes our NRC, which we believe has been highly effectivesegment will continue to grow year-over-year in
increasing the quality and speed of delivery of services2015 due to our
clients. We continue to believe that our operating model allows us to deliver our service offeringsongoing investments in
a disciplined and consistent manner across all geographies and business lines.revenue generating resources.
Our FA segment experienced an increase in Flex revenues
of 16.9% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013, which was a significant acceleration from the increase of 0.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to
2012, which was a deceleration from the increase of 9.0% during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to 2011. According to2012. In its September 2014 update, SIA provides an
update in September 2013 from SIA, theexpectation that finance and accounting growth
estimate for 2013 was lowered to 2% as a result of headwinds within the industry but the U.S. market for temporary finance and accounting workers is expected to growwill be 5% in 2014
as the overall economy gains momentum.and will be augmented by an additional 5% in 2015. Management believes the benefit from the significant investment in the revenue generator headcount for FA made in
2012 and 2013 will bethe last few years was realized in 2014 through the capture of the expected growth in the FA industry
as a result ofand is due to improvements in associate productivity that typically come with tenure.
HIM Flex revenues increased 1.6% during The Firm believes the year ended December 31, 2013 comparedFA segment will continue to 2012 and increased 12.2% during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 2011. The increaserecognize year-over-year growth in 2013 is partially attributable to the required implementation of ICD-10 by October 1, 2014. The increase in revenues from ICD-10 was partially offset by a reduction in spending by customers as a result of increased healthcare reimbursement regulations. We expect ICD-10 to continue contributing to the growth of HIM service revenues throughout 2014.
2015.
Our GS segment experienced an increase in net service revenues
of 6.6% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013 and an increase of 0.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to
2012 and decreased 1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared2012. The increase primarily relates to
2011. The slight growth in 2013 was primarily related to thestronger-than-expected expansion of revenues with existing
GS customers in addition to the ramping of new government contract wins through the third quarter, partially offset by delays in certain government contracts during the fourth quarter due to the government shutdown. We expect 2014 revenues to decline over 2013 as a result of the aforementioned strategic decision made by Kforce management with regard tocustomers. The Firm believes the GS
reporting unit to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services.segment will remain flat year-over-year in 2015.
The following table details total Flex hours for our Tech
FA and
HIMFA segments and percentage changes over the prior period for the years ended December
31: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in 000’s) | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | | 10,929 | | | | 9.0 | % | | | 10,023 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 9,615 | |
FA | | | 6,550 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 6,352 | | | | 10.8 | % | | | 5,731 | |
HIM | | | 1,168 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 1,138 | | | | 7.3 | % | | | 1,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total hours | | | 18,647 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 17,513 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 16,407 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | 12,024 |
| | 10.0 | % | | 10,929 |
| | 9.0 | % | | 10,023 |
|
| FA | 7,691 |
| | 17.4 | % | | 6,550 |
| | 3.1 | % | | 6,352 |
|
| Total hours | 19,715 |
| | 12.8 | % | | 17,479 |
| | 6.7 | % | | 16,375 |
|
As the GS segment primarily provides solutions-based services as compared to staffing services, Flex hours are not presented above.
The increase in Flex revenues for Tech for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 was $103.1 million, composed of a $71.6 million increase in volume, a $31.0 million increase in bill rate and a $0.5 million increase from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for FA for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 was $36.1 million, composed of a $37.0 million increase in volume, a $0.8 million decrease in bill rate and a $0.1 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for Tech for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was $65.1 million, composed of a $58.5 million increase in volume, a $8.2 million increase in bill rate and a $1.6 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for FA for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was $1.4 million, composed of a $6.6 million increase in volume, a $5.1 million decrease in bill rate and a $0.1 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses.
The changes in billable expenses, which are included as a component of net services revenues, are primarily attributable to increases or decreases in project-based work. Flex billable expenses for each of our segments were as follows for the years ended December
31: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in $000’s) | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | $ | 5,630 | | | | (22.0 | )% | | $ | 7,222 | | | | 58.0 | % | | $ | 4,571 | |
FA | | | 423 | | | | (19.7 | )% | | | 527 | | | | (17.8 | )% | | | 641 | |
HIM | | | 5,245 | | | | (17.8 | )% | | | 6,381 | | | | 7.2 | % | | | 5,955 | |
GS | | | 348 | | | | (37.4 | )% | | | 556 | | | | (34.7 | )% | | | 852 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total billable expenses | | $ | 11,646 | | | | (20.7 | )% | | $ | 14,686 | | | | 22.2 | % | | $ | 12,019 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | $ | 6,093 |
| | 8.2 | % | | $ | 5,630 |
| | (22.0 | )% | | $ | 7,222 |
|
| FA | 309 |
| | (27.0 | )% | | 423 |
| | (19.7 | )% | | 527 |
|
| GS | 391 |
| | 12.4 | % | | 348 |
| | (37.4 | )% | | 556 |
|
| Total billable expenses | $ | 6,793 |
| | 6.1 | % | | $ | 6,401 |
| | (22.9 | )% | | $ | 8,305 |
|
Search Fees.The primary drivers of Search fees are the number of placements and the average placement fee. Search fees also include conversion revenues (conversions occur when consultants initially assigned to a client on a temporary basis are later converted to a permanent placement). Our GS segment does not make permanent placements. Search revenues decreased 3.6% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by the reallocation of revenue-generating resources to capture the current high demand for our Flex staffing services. Search revenues increased
2.5%2.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to
2012 and increased 9.6% during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to 2011. We expect the slight growth in Search to continue in 2014.2012.
Total placements for each segment were as follows for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | | 1,222 | | | | (7.2 | )% | | | 1,317 | | | | 8.7 | % | | | 1,212 | |
FA | | | 2,449 | | | | 19.8 | % | | | 2,044 | | | | 2.1 | % | | | 2,001 | |
HIM | | | 23 | | | | (42.5 | )% | | | 40 | | | | (45.2 | )% | | | 73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total placements | | | 3,694 | | | | 8.6 | % | | | 3,401 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3,286 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | 1,193 |
| | (2.4 | )% | | 1,222 |
| | (7.2 | )% | | 1,317 |
|
| FA | 2,256 |
| | (7.9 | )% | | 2,449 |
| | 19.8 | % | | 2,044 |
|
| Total placements | 3,449 |
| | (6.0 | )% | | 3,671 |
| | 9.2 | % | | 3,361 |
|
The average fee per placement for each segment was as follows for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | $ | 15,695 | | | | 0.8 | % | | $ | 15,577 | | | | 6.2 | % | | $ | 14,665 | |
FA | | | 11,946 | | | | (8.5 | )% | | | 13,051 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | 12,605 | |
HIM | | | 17,990 | | | | 49.6 | % | | | 12,029 | | | | 65.6 | % | | | 7,264 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total average placement fee | | $ | 13,224 | | | | (5.7 | )% | | $ | 14,017 | | | | 5.8 | % | | $ | 13,244 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | $ | 16,062 |
| | 2.3 | % | | $ | 15,695 |
| | 0.8 | % | | $ | 15,577 |
|
| FA | 12,205 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 11,946 |
| | (8.5 | )% | | 13,051 |
|
| Total average placement fee | $ | 13,539 |
| | 2.6 | % | | $ | 13,194 |
| | (6.0 | )% | | $ | 14,041 |
|
The decrease in Search revenues from 2013 to 2014 was $1.7 million, composed of a $2.9 million decrease in volume, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in rate. The increase in Search revenues from 2012 to 2013 was $1.2 million, composed of a $4.3 million increase in volume partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in rate.
Gross Profit. Gross profit on Flex billings is determined by deducting the direct cost of services (primarily flexible personnel payroll wages, payroll taxes, payroll-related insurance, and subcontractor costs) from net Flex service revenues. In addition, consistent with industry practices, gross profit dollars from Search fees are equal to revenues, because there are generally no direct costs associated with such revenues. The following table presents, for each segment, the gross profit percentage (gross profit as a percentage of revenues) for the year, as well as the increase or decrease over the preceding period, as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | | 29.7 | % | | | — | | | | 29.7 | % | | | 1.4 | % | | | 29.3 | % |
FA | | | 38.6 | % | | | 1.0 | % | | | 38.2 | % | | | 2.1 | % | | | 37.4 | % |
HIM | | | 32.3 | % | | | (9.0 | )% | | | 35.5 | % | | | (0.3 | )% | | | 35.6 | % |
GS | | | 34.1 | % | | | 8.6 | % | | | 31.4 | % | | | 2.3 | % | | | 30.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total gross profit percentage | | | 32.1 | % | | | — | | | | 32.1 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | 31.6 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | 28.9 | % | | (2.7 | )% | | 29.7 | % | | — |
| | 29.7 | % |
| FA | 36.5 | % | | (5.4 | )% | | 38.6 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 38.2 | % |
| GS | 31.0 | % | | (9.1 | )% | | 34.1 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 31.4 | % |
| Total gross profit percentage | 30.8 | % | | (4.0 | )% | | 32.1 | % | | 0.6 | % | | 31.9 | % |
Kforce also monitors the gross profit percentage as a percentage of Flex revenues, which is referred to as the Flex gross profit percentage. This provides management with helpful insight into the other drivers of total gross profit percentage such as changes in volume evidenced by changes in hours billed for Flex and changes in the spread between bill rate and pay rate for Flex.
The increase in Search gross profit from 2012 to 2013 was $1.2 million, composed of a $3.9 million increase in volume, offset by a $2.7 million decrease in rate. The increase in Search gross profit from 2011 to 2012 was $4.2 million, composed of a $1.6 million increase in volume and a $2.6 million increase in rate.
The following table presents, for each segment, the Flex gross profit percentage for the years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Tech | | | 27.8 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | 27.5 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | 27.2 | % |
FA | | | 30.2 | % | | | (0.7 | )% | | | 30.4 | % | | | 4.1 | % | | | 29.2 | % |
HIM | | | 31.9 | % | | | (9.1 | )% | | | 35.1 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 35.1 | % |
GS | | | 34.1 | % | | | 8.6 | % | | | 31.4 | % | | | 2.3 | % | | | 30.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Flex gross profit percentage | | | 29.1 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | 29.0 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | 28.5 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Tech | 27.2 | % | | (2.2 | )% | | 27.8 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 27.5 | % |
| FA | 29.5 | % | | (2.3 | )% | | 30.2 | % | | (0.7 | )% | | 30.4 | % |
| GS | 31.0 | % | | (9.1 | )% | | 34.1 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 31.4 | % |
| Total Flex gross profit percentage | 28.0 | % | | (3.1 | )% | | 28.9 | % | | 1.4 | % | | 28.5 | % |
The increase in Flex gross profit from 2013 to 2014 was $32.0 million, composed of a $42.0 million increase in volume, partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in rate. The increase in Flex gross profit from 2012 to 2013 was $20.5$22.6 million, composed of a $19.8$19.1 million increase in volume and a $0.7$3.5 million increase in rate.
The
increase in Flex gross profit from 2011 to 2012 was $26.0 million, composed of a $21.0 million increase in volume and a $5.0 million increase in rate.The increasedecrease in Flex gross profit percentage of 1090 basis points in 20132014 from 20122013 was primarily driven by the improvementimpact of change in the spread between our bill rates and pay rates predominatelyas a result of higher concentration of our revenue growth coming from larger, lower-margin profile clients, and an increase in benefit costs. In addition, our Flex gross profit within our GS segment. This improvementsegment was partially offsetnegatively impacted by a decrease in the Flex gross profit in our HIM segmentshift to higher mix of subcontractor labor, which was primarily related to investments we are making to retaindriven by current contractual demands, and train consultants in preparation for future ICD-10 related opportunities.increased benefit costs. A continued focus for Kforce is to optimizeoptimizing the spread between bill rates and pay rates by providing our associates with tools, economic knowledge and defined programs to drive improvement in the effectiveness of our pricing strategy around the staffing services we provide. We believe this strategy will serve to balance the desire for optimal volume, rate, effort and duration of assignment, while ultimately maximizing the benefit for our clients, our consultants and Kforce. We anticipate that Flex gross profit margins will remain flatstable in 20142015 as compared to 20132014 as we balance improvement in the spread between our bill rates and pay rates with capturing market demand.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, total commissions, compensation, payroll taxes, and benefit costs as a percentage of SG&A represented 85.2%. 86.2%84.8%, 85.9%, and 87.4%87.1%, respectively. Commissions and related payroll taxes and benefit costs are variable costs driven primarily by revenuesrevenue and gross profit levels, and associate performance. Therefore, as gross profit levels change, these expenses arewould also generally be anticipated to change but remain relatively consistent as a percentage of revenues. The following table presents these components of SG&A along with an “other” caption, which includes bad debt expense, lease expense, professional fees, travel, telephone, computer and certain other
expenses;expenses, as an absolute amount and as a percentage of total net service revenues for the years ended December
31: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in $000’s) | | 2013 | | | % of
Revenues | | | 2012 | | | % of
Revenues | | | 2011 | | | % of
Revenues | |
Compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits costs | | $ | 275,881 | | | | 24.0 | % | | $ | 277,851 | | | | 25.7 | % | | $ | 239,457 | | | | 23.8 | % |
Other | | | 48,052 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 44,585 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 34,615 | | | | 3.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total SG&A | | $ | 323,933 | | | | 28.1 | % | | $ | 322,436 | | | | 29.8 | % | | $ | 274,072 | | | | 27.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | % of
Revenues | | 2013 | | % of
Revenues | | 2012 | | % of
Revenues |
| Compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits costs | $ | 267,471 |
| | 22.0 | % | | $ | 264,636 |
| | 24.7 | % | | $ | 266,413 |
| | 26.5 | % |
| Other | 47,867 |
| | 3.9 | % | | 43,308 |
| | 4.0 | % | | 39,527 |
| | 3.9 | % |
| Total SG&A | $ | 315,338 |
| | 25.9 | % | | $ | 307,944 |
| | 28.7 | % | | $ | 305,940 |
| | 30.4 | % |
SG&A as a percentage of net service revenues decreased 280 basis points in 2014 compared to 2013. This was primarily attributable to the following:
Decrease in compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits cost of 2.7% of net service revenues, which was primarily a result of a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the organizational realignment executed by the Firm during the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as a decrease in the annual effective commission rate due to certain changes made to our compensation plans.
Decrease in professional fees of 0.1% which was primarily the result of a reduction in corporate activities.
SG&A as a percentage of net service revenues decreased 170 basis points in 2013 compared to 2012. This was primarily attributable to the following:
Decrease in compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits cost of 1.7%1.8% of net service revenues, which was primarily related to the discretionary acceleration of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and ALTI awards on March 31, 2012. This resulted in incremental compensation expense of $31.3 million, including payroll taxes, that was recorded during the first quarter of 2012. This decrease was partially offset by the impact of the revenue generator headcount additions in 2012 and 2013, as well as additional costs due to the Firm’s execution of a realignment plan during the fourth quarter of 2013.
As mentioned above, the Firm executed an organizational realignment plan, whereby we streamlined the Firm’s leadership and revenue enablers to align a higher percentage of roles closer to the customer.
Goodwill Impairment. During the fourth quarter, the Firm incurred severance and termination-related chargesyear ended December 31, 2014, Kforce performed a step one goodwill impairment analysis for each of $7.1 million as aits reporting units, which did not result of the plan. Additionally, in connection with the realignment and succession planning, the Compensation Committee approved a discretionary bonus of $3.6 million paid to a broad group of senior management during the fourth quarter of 2013. The new alignment has resulted in more significant focus on our revenue generating activities and more streamlined processes and tools that enable us to simplify and improve how we do business with our clients and consultants. Additionally, we believe that this organizational realignment could positively impact our operating margins in 2014.SG&A as a percentage of net service revenues increased 250 basis points in 2012 compared to 2011. This was primarily attributable to the following:
Increase in compensation and benefits cost of 2.0% of net service revenues, which was primarily related to an increase in stock-based compensation expense and related payroll taxes for the acceleration of the vesting for substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and ALTI awards on March 31, 2012. This resulted in compensation expense of $31.3 million, including payroll taxes, being recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Decrease in commission expense of 0.2% of net service revenues, which was primarily attributable to a decrease in the estimated annual effective commission rate due to certain changes made to our compensation plans. This decrease was partially offset by the increase in the average revenue generator headcount during 2012 as compared to 2011.
Increase in bad debt expense of 0.3% of net service revenues, which was primarily attributable to (i) an increased level of write-offs in the first half of 2012 as compared to 2011 and (ii) a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts during 2011 due to positive collection trends.
Increase in professional fees of 0.2% of net service revenues as compared to 2011 due to an additional investment in compliance-related activities.
Goodwill Impairment.any impairment. As discussed above, Kforce management made a strategic business decision during the fourth quarter of 2013 with regard to the GS reporting unit to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services. Asservices and as a result of the change in focus, management plans to reallocate existing investments in the business and redirect the business development team to concentratewe recorded an impairment charge on a more specific and, in our opinion, a higher quality revenue stream. These plans will ultimately result in the transition away from certain existing revenue streams, specific revenue-generating contracts and opportunities in the business development life cycle that do not fit within the revised strategic scope of service offerings, including pure staff augmentation as well as product sales. This change in strategy, coupled with the lengthy contract procurement cycle within the government sector of approximately 18 months for solutions-based services, led us to expect negative impacts on near-term growth prospects of the GS segment and reductions in revenues and profitability over the next few years.
We believe these circumstances resulted in a possible impairment trigger during the fourth quarter, which was assessed in conjunction with the Firm’s annual goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2013. The step one analysis for the GS reporting unit resultedgoodwill in the carrying value of invested capital exceeding the fair value of the GS reporting unit, primarily due to the reduction in the forecast. As a result, Kforce performed a step two goodwill impairment test for its GS reporting unit which ultimately resulted in Kforce recording an impairment chargeamount of approximately $14.5 million, with a related tax benefit of approximately $5.2 million during the fourth quarter ofyear ended December 31, 2013.
During 2012, Kforce tookdue to certain adverse effects of events and indications during that time period, we recorded an impairment charge on the GS reporting unit goodwill in the amount of $69.2 million as previously discussed. Goodwill allocated towhich included a related tax benefit of $24.7 million during the GS reporting unit was $19.0 million and $33.5 million as ofyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
A2012.
Although the valuation of the business supported its carrying value in 2014, a deterioration in the assumptions discussed
in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates" and in Note 6 – “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”
toin the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could result in an additional impairment
charge.charge in the future.
Depreciation and Amortization. The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense by major category for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012, as well as the increases (decreases) experienced during 2014 and 2013 and 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in $000’s) | | 2013 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2012 | | | Increase
(Decrease) | | | 2011 | |
Fixed asset depreciation | | $ | 4,325 | | | | 16.7 | % | | $ | 3,706 | | | | (11.7 | )% | | $ | 4,197 | |
Capital lease asset depreciation | | | 1,538 | | | | (7.5 | ) | | | 1,662 | | | | 2.0 | | | | 1,629 | |
Capitalized software amortization | | | 3,236 | | | | (28.3 | ) | | | 4,514 | | | | (18.3 | ) | | | 5,527 | |
Intangible asset amortization | | | 747 | | | | (17.6 | ) | | | 907 | | | | (21.3 | ) | | | 1,152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total depreciation and amortization | | $ | 9,846 | | | | (8.7 | )% | | $ | 10,789 | | | | (13.7 | )% | | $ | 12,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2013 | | Increase
(Decrease) | | 2012 |
| Fixed asset depreciation | $ | 5,142 |
| | 18.9 | % | | $ | 4,325 |
| | 16.7 | % | | $ | 3,706 |
|
| Capital lease asset depreciation | 1,203 |
| | (21.8 | )% | | 1,538 |
| | (7.5 | )% | | 1,662 |
|
| Capitalized software amortization | 2,904 |
| | (10.3 | )% | | 3,236 |
| | (28.3 | )% | | 4,514 |
|
| Intangible asset amortization | 645 |
| | (13.7 | )% | | 747 |
| | (17.6 | )% | | 907 |
|
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 9,894 |
| | 0.5 | % | | $ | 9,846 |
| | (8.7 | )% | | $ | 10,789 |
|
Fixed Asset Depreciation: The $0.8 million increase in 2014 is primarily the result of the leasehold improvement and furniture and fixture additions made during 2014. The $0.6 million increase in 2013 is primarily the result of the leasehold improvement additions made during 2013.
Capital Lease Asset Depreciation: The $0.5$0.3 million decrease in 20122014 is primarily the result of certain assets becoming fully depreciateda reduction in computer hardware additions and current year disposals during early 2012.2014. The $0.1 million decrease in 2013 is primarily the result of computer hardware disposals during 2013.
Capitalized Software Amortization: The $0.3 million decrease in 2014 is primarily the result of software disposals during 2014. The $1.3 million decrease in 2013 is primarily the result of several significant capitalized software balances becoming fully amortized during 2013. The $1.0 million decrease in 2012 is related to software becoming fully amortized during 2012.
Other Expense, Net.Other expense, net was $1.2$1.4 million in 2014, $1.1 million in 2013, and $1.1 million in 2012, and $1.3 million in 2011, and consists primarily of interest expense related to Kforce’s Credit Facility.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For the year ending December 31, 2014, income tax expense as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes (our “effective rate”) was 38.7%. There were no individual items that had a material impact on Kforce's effective rate. For the year ending December 31, 2013, income tax expense as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes (our “effective rate”) was 46.3%51.6%, which was impacted by certain non-deductible meals and entertainment, the partially non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and certain other non-deductible expenses. For the year ending December 31, 2012, income tax benefit as a percentage of lossincome from continuing operations before income taxes (our “effective rate”) was 35.7%36.5%. The income tax benefit for 2012 was primarily related to tax benefits associated with the partially deductible goodwill impairment charge taken in 2012. For the year ending December 31, 2011, income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes was 36.3%.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes.Discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include the consolidated income and 2011expenses for HIM. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce completed the sale of HIM resulting in a pre-tax gain of $94.3 million. Included in the determination of the pre-tax gain is approximately $4.9 million of goodwill for HIM and transaction expenses totaling approximately $11.0 million, which primarily included legal fees, stock-based compensation related to acceleration of restricted stock due to change in control provisions, commissions and transaction bonuses. Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 also includes the consolidated income and expenses of KCR. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Kforce completed the sale of KCR resulting in a pre-tax gain, including adjustments, of $36.4 million. Included in the determination of the pre-tax gain is approximately $5.5 million of goodwill and transaction expenses totaling approximately $2.2 million, which primarily included commissions, legal fees and transaction bonuses. Income tax expense as a percentage of income from discontinued operations, before income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was 40.6%, 40.1% and 2011 were 44.6% and 39.5%43.7%, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rate
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share. "Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share", a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined by Kforce as netearnings (loss) income, in total and on a per share basis, before discontinued operations, goodwillnon-cash impairment (pre-tax) charges, interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and amortization of stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share should not be considered a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share are significant components in understanding and assessing our past and future financial performance, and this presentation should not be construed as an inference by us that our future results will be unaffected by those items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share is a key measure used by management to evaluate itsour operations, including itsour ability to generate cash flows and, consequently, management believes this is useful information to investors. The measure should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income, cash flows or other financial statement information presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. The measure is not determined in accordance with GAAP and is thus susceptible to varying calculations. Also, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Some of the items that are excluded also impacted certain balance sheet assets, resulting in all or a portion of an asset being written off without a corresponding recovery of cash, we may have previously spent with respect to the asset. In addition, although we excluded amortization of stock-based compensation expense (which we expect to continue to incur in the future) because it is a non-cash expense, the associated stock issued may result in an increase in our outstanding shares of stock, which may result in the dilution of our stockholder ownership interest. We encourage you to evaluate these items and the potential risks of excluding such items when analyzing our financial position.
The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share results and includes a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income
and Adjusted Earnings Per Share to Earnings Per Share for the years ended December
31: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in $000’s) except per share amounts | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | Per Share | | | 2012 | | | Per Share | | | 2011 | | | Per Share | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 27,156 | | | $ | 0.70 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,009 | | | | 0.62 | | | | 8,100 | | | | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (35,712 | ) | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 19,056 | | | $ | 0.49 | |
Goodwill impairment, pre-tax | | | 14,510 | | | | 0.43 | | | | 69,158 | | | | 1.93 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,846 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 10,789 | | | | 0.30 | | | | 12,505 | | | | 0.32 | |
Amortization of restricted stock | | | 2,570 | | | | 0.08 | | | | 25,688 | | | | 0.72 | | | | 11,819 | | | | 0.30 | |
Interest expense and other | | | 1,290 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 994 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 1,272 | | | | 0.04 | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | | | 9,311 | | | | 0.28 | | | | (19,854 | ) | | | (0.55 | ) | | | 10,858 | | | | 0.28 | |
Earnings per share adjustment (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 48,314 | | | $ | 1.44 | | | $ | 51,063 | | | $ | 1.42 | | | $ | 55,510 | | | $ | 1.43 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | Per Share | | 2013 | | Per Share | | 2012 | | Per Share |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 90,915 |
| | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 10,787 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 61,517 |
| | 1.94 |
| | 5,493 |
| | 0.16 |
| | 28,428 |
| | 0.80 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 29,398 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 5,294 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (42,131 | ) | | $ | (1.18 | ) |
| Goodwill impairment, pre-tax | — |
| | — |
| | 14,510 |
| | 0.43 |
| | 69,158 |
| | 1.93 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,894 |
| | 0.31 |
| | 9,846 |
| | 0.29 |
| | 10,789 |
| | 0.30 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 2,969 |
| | 0.09 |
| | 2,555 |
| | 0.07 |
| | 25,688 |
| | 0.72 |
|
| Interest expense and other | 1,396 |
| | 0.04 |
| | 1,212 |
| | 0.04 |
| | 934 |
| | 0.03 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 18,559 |
| | 0.59 |
| | 5,635 |
| | 0.17 |
| | (24,227 | ) | | (0.68 | ) |
| Earnings per share adjustment (1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 62,216 |
| | $ | 1.96 |
| | $ | 39,052 |
| | $ | 1.16 |
| | $ | 40,211 |
| | $ | 1.11 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | 31,475 |
| | | | 33,511 |
| | | | 35,791 |
| | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | 31,691 |
| | | | 33,643 |
| | | | 35,791 |
| | |
| |
| (1) | This earnings per share adjustment is necessary to properly reconcile net loss per share on a GAAP basis to Adjusted EBITDA per share. |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
To meet our capital and liquidity requirements, we primarily rely on operating cash flow, as well as borrowings under our existing Credit Facility.credit facility. At December 31, 2013,2014, Kforce had $112.9$130.2 million in working capital compared to $72.7$112.9 million in 2012.2013. Kforce’s current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) was 2.4 at the end of 2014 and 2.3 at the end of 2013 and 1.7 at the end of 2012.2013. The increase in working capital was primarily due to increases in the accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued other liabilities. In addition, our recent sale of HIM resulted in proceeds of $109.4 million, net of transaction costs for legal fees, commissions and cash transaction bonuses and $71.1 million net of the income tax receivable.Please see theaforementioned transaction costs and taxes. These additional funds were used initially to reduce outstanding borrowings under our credit facility and ultimately to repurchase shares of common stock.
The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
20112012 in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
forprovide a more detailed description of our cash flows.
Currently, Kforce is principally focused on achieving the appropriate balance in the following areas of cash flow:
(i)(1) achieving positive cash flow from operating activities;
(ii)(2) returning capital to our shareholders through our dividend program;
(iii) reducing the outstanding balance of our Credit Facility; (iv)(3) repurchasing our common stock;
(v)(4) maintaining an appropriate outstanding balance on our credit facility; (5) investing in our infrastructure to allow sustainable growth via capital expenditures; and
(vi)(6) making strategic acquisitions.
We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and available borrowings under our
Credit Facilitycredit facility will be adequate to meet the capital expenditure and working capital requirements of our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, significant deterioration in the economic environment or market conditions, among other things, could negatively impact operating results
cash flow,and liquidity,
andas well as the ability of our lenders to fund borrowings. There is no assurance that:
(i)(1) our lenders will be able to fund our borrowings or
(ii)(2) if operations were to deteriorate and additional financing were to become necessary, we would be able to obtain financing in amounts sufficient to meet operating requirements or at terms which are satisfactory and which would allow us to remain competitive.
Actual results could also differ materially from those indicated as a result of a number of factors, including the use of currently available resources for possible acquisitions and possible additional stock
repurchases and dividends.repurchases.
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as
follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | |
(in $000’s) | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 465 | | | $ | 55,978 | | | $ | 31,240 | |
Investing activities | | | (8,547 | ) | | | 52,405 | | | | (10,090 | ) |
Financing activities | | | 7,576 | | | | (107,941 | ) | | | (21,266 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (506 | ) | | $ | 442 | | | $ | (116 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Cash (used in) provided by: | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | (25,582 | ) | | $ | 465 |
| | $ | 55,978 |
|
| Investing activities | 110,535 |
| | (8,547 | ) | | 52,405 |
|
| Financing activities | (84,590 | ) | | 7,576 |
| | (107,941 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 363 |
| | $ | (506 | ) | | $ | 442 |
|
As was previously discussed, Kforce divested
of HIM on August 4, 2014 and KCR on March 31, 2012. The accompanying
consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of
cash flowsCash Flows have been presented on a combined basis (continuing operations and discontinued operations). Cash flows provided by discontinued operations for all prior periods were provided by operating activities and were not material to the capital resources of Kforce. In addition, the absence of cash flows from discontinued operations is not expected to have a significant effect on the future liquidity, financial position, or capital resources of Kforce.
The significant variations in cash provided by operating activities and net income
in 2013 are principally related to adjustments to net income for certain non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization expense,
and stock-based compensation
and gain on sale of discontinued operations, as well as the goodwill impairment
charge.charges in prior years. These adjustments are more fully detailed in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012, in Item 8. Financial Statement and Supplementary Data. When comparing cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, the primary drivers of cash inflows and outflows are net trade receivables and accounts payable. The decrease in cash
provided byused in operating activities in
20132014 compared to
20122013 is
aprimarily the result of the increase in account receivable due to the timing of collections.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures have been made over the years on Kforce’s infrastructure to support the growth in our business.
Capital expenditures during
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, which exclude equipment acquired under capital leases, were
$6.0 million, $8.1 million
and $5.8 million,
and $6.5respectively. Proceeds from the divestiture of HIM were $117.9 million
respectively.Effective Marchduring the year ended December 31, 2012, Kforce sold all of the issued and outstanding stock of KCR for a purchase price of $50.0 million plus a $7.3 million post-closing working capital adjustment.2014. Proceeds from the divestiture of KCR were $55.4 million, net of transaction costs, during the year ended December 31, 2012.
We expect to continue to selectively invest in our infrastructure in order to support the expected future growth in our business. Kforce believes it has sufficient cash and availability under its
Credit Facilitycredit facility to make any expected necessary capital expenditures in the foreseeable future. In addition, we continually review our portfolio of businesses and their operations in comparison to our internal strategic and performance objectives. As part of this review, we may acquire other businesses and further invest in, fully divest and/or sell parts of our current businesses.
During 2013, Kforce repurchasedthe year ended December 31, 2014, the Firm paid cash for repurchases of common stock totaling $29.8$101.8 million, which was comprisedcomposed of approximately $27.3$100.2 million of open market common stock repurchases and $1.6 million of common stock repurchases attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards, andawards. During 2013, Kforce repurchased common stock totaling $29.8 million, which was composed of approximately $29.0 million of open market common stock repurchases (including the settlement of approximately $2.5 million of common stock repurchases from the fourth quarter of 2012.2012) and $0.8 million of common stock repurchases attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards. During 2012, Kforce repurchased common stock totaling $44.4 million, which included open market repurchases of common stock of approximately $28.9 million and repurchases of common stock attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards of approximately $15.5 million. In 2011, repurchases
During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce declared and paid dividends in cash of
common stock were $59.6$12.8 million,
which included open market repurchases of common stock of approximately $58.1 million and repurchases of common stock attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards of approximately $1.5 million.or $0.41 per share. During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce declared and paid a cash dividend of $3.3 million, or $0.10 per share. During the fourth quarter of 2012, Kforce declared and paid a special cash dividend of $35.2 million, or $1.00 per share. WeKforce currently expectexpects to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to ourits December 20132014 dividend of $0.10$0.11 per share. However, the declarationamount and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by ourKforce’s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of ourthe Firm’s financial performance.
performance and legal ability to pay.
On September 20, 2011, Kforce entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with a syndicate led by Bank of America, N.A. This was amended on March 30, 2012 through the execution of a Consent and First Amendment, on December 27, 2013 through the execution of a Second Amendment and Joinder, and further amended on December 23, 2014 through the execution of a Third Amendment (as amended to date, the "Credit Facility") resulting in a maximum borrowing capacity of $170.0 million, as well as an accordion option of $50.0 million. The maximum borrowings available to Kforce under the Credit Facility are limited to: (a) a revolving
credit facilityCredit Facility of up to
$135$170.0 million (the “Revolving Loan Amount”) and (b) a
$15$15.0 million sub-limit included in the Credit Facility for letters of credit.
Kforce has a remaining accordion option to increase the borrowing capacity an additional $15 million.Borrowing availability
Available borrowings under the Credit Facility isare limited to the remainder of: (a) the lesser of (i) $135.0 million minus the four week average aggregate weekly payroll of employees assigned to work for customers, or (ii) 85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable, plus 80%85% of the net amount of eligible unbilled accounts receivable, plus 80% of the net amount of eligible employee placement accounts, minus certain minimum availability reserves,reserve; provided, that the Firm may, subject to certain conditions, elect to increase the available borrowing limitation based on a percentage of the appraised fair market value of the Firm's corporate headquarters property and/or an additional percentage of net eligible accounts receivable, net eligible unbilled accounts receivable and in either case; minus (b) the aggregate outstanding amountnet eligible employee placement accounts. Borrowings under the Credit Facility.Facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Firm, excluding the real estate located at the Firm's corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, unless the eligible real estate conditions are met. Outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Amount bear interest at a rate of: (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on various factors; or (b) the higher of: (i)(1) the prime rate, (ii)(2) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (iii)(3) LIBOR plus 1.25%. Fluctuations in the ratio of unbilled to billed receivables could result in material changes to availability from time to time. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility require Kforce to pay a fronting fee equal to 0.125% of the amount of each letter of credit issued, plus a per annum fee equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans based on the total letters of credit outstanding. To the extent that Kforce has unused availability under the Credit Facility, an unused line fee is required to be paid on a monthly basis equal to (a) if the applicable marginaverage daily aggregate revolver outstanding are less than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.35% or (b) if the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding are greater than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.25% times the amount by which the maximum revolver amount exceeded the sum of the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding, amount of the revolving loans and the average daily undrawn face amount of outstanding letters of credit during the immediately preceding month. Borrowings undermonth or shorter period if calculated for the Credit Facility are secured by substantially allfirst month hereafter or on the termination date.
Under the Credit Facility, Kforce is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants including (but not limited to) the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 if the Firm’s availability under the Credit Facility is less than the greater of 10% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all of the lenders under the Credit Facility and
$11.0$11 million. Our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities could be limited if the Firm's availability is less than the greater of 12.5% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all lenders under the Credit Facility and $20.6 million. Kforce had availability under the Credit Facility of
$43.2$39.6 million as of December 31,
2013;2014; therefore, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was not
applicable.applicable and our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities was not restricted. Kforce believes that it will be able to maintain
thethese minimum availability
requirement;requirements; however, in the event that Kforce is unable to do so, Kforce could fail the fixed charge coverage ratio,
covenant, which would constitute an event of
default.default, or could limit our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities. Kforce believes the likelihood of default is remote. The Credit Facility expires
September 20, 2016.December 23, 2019.
As of December 31,
2014 and 2013,
and 2012, $62.6$93.3 million and
$21.0$62.6 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, respectively. During the three months ended December 31,
2013,2014, maximum outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were
$62.6$93.3 million. As of February 24,
2014, $67.52015, 97.0 million was outstanding and
$4039.7 million was available under the Credit Facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. At December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce had letters of credit outstanding for workers’ compensation and other insurance coverage totaling
$2.4$2.7 million, and for facility lease deposits totaling
$0.3$0.5 million. Aside from certain obligations more fully described in the Contractual Obligations and Commitments section below, we do not have any additional off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are expected to have, a material effect on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.
Stock Repurchases
During the year ended December 31, 2012, Kforce repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of common stock attributable to open market repurchases and shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards at a total cost of approximately $44.4 million. As of December 31, 2012, $39.9 million remained available for future repurchases. On February 1, 2013, our Board of Directors approved an increase to the existing authorization for repurchases of common stock by $50.0 million (exclusive of any previously unused authorizations). As a result, $89.9 million remained available for future repurchases as of February 1, 2013.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, Kforce repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock at a total cost of approximately $27.3 million. As of December 31, 2013, $62.6 million
remainsof the Board-authorized common stock repurchase program remained available for future repurchases.
On September 10, 2014, our Board of Directors approved an increase to the existing authorization for repurchases of common stock by $70.0 million (exclusive of any previously unused authorizations). During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce repurchased approximately 4.9 million shares of common stock at a total cost of approximately $102.9 million under the Board authorized common stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2014, $29.7 million remained available for future repurchases.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents our expected future contractual obligations as of December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments due by period | |
(in $000’s) | | Total | | | Less than
1 year | | | 1-3 Years | | | 3-5 Years | | | More than
5 years | |
Operating lease obligations | | $ | 12,604 | | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 6,003 | | | $ | 1,172 | | | $ | 19 | |
Capital lease obligations | | | 8,082 | | | | 3,539 | | | | 4,484 | | | | 59 | | | | — | |
Credit Facility (a) | | | 62,642 | | | | — | | | | 62,642 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Interest payable – Credit Facility (b) | | | 2,705 | | | | 984 | | | | 1,721 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Purchase obligations | | | 10,787 | | | | 6,165 | | | | 4,622 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Liability for unrecognized tax positions (c) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Deferred compensation plan liability (d) | | | 26,296 | | | | 3,149 | | | | 2,126 | | | | 914 | | | | 20,107 | |
Other (e) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Supplemental executive retirement plan (f) | | | 10,538 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,538 | |
Supplement executive retirement health plan (f) | | | 8,537 | | | | 48 | | | | 109 | | | | 146 | | | | 8,234 | |
Foreign defined benefit pension plan (g) | | | 13,251 | | | | — | | | | 404 | | | | — | | | | 12,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 155,442 | | | $ | 19,295 | | | $ | 82,111 | | | $ | 2,291 | | | $ | 51,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments due by period |
| | | Total | | Less than
1 year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | More than
5 years |
| Operating lease obligations | | $ | 18,136 |
| | $ | 6,348 |
| | $ | 9,099 |
| | $ | 2,350 |
| | $ | 339 |
|
| Capital lease obligations | | 1,759 |
| | 1,141 |
| | 612 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
|
| Credit Facility (a) | | 93,333 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 93,333 |
| | — |
|
| Interest payable – Credit Facility (b) | | 7,933 |
| | 1,587 |
| | 3,173 |
| | 3,173 |
| | — |
|
| Purchase obligations | | 12,561 |
| | 7,563 |
| | 4,987 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
|
| Liability for unrecognized tax positions (c) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Deferred compensation plan liability (d) | | 26,076 |
| | 3,651 |
| | 1,883 |
| | 1,056 |
| | 19,486 |
|
| Other (e) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Supplemental executive retirement plan (f) | | 13,268 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,187 |
| | 4,081 |
|
| Foreign defined benefit pension plan (g) | | 12,469 |
| | 404 |
| | 15 |
| | 53 |
| | 11,997 |
|
| Total | | $ | 185,535 |
| | $ | 20,694 |
| | $ | 19,769 |
| | $ | 109,169 |
| | $ | 35,903 |
|
| |
| (a) | The Credit Facility expires in September 2016.December 23, 2019. |
| |
| (b) | Kforce’s weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 20132014 was 1.57%1.7%, which was utilized to forecast the expected future interest rate payments. These payments are inherently uncertain due to interest rate and outstanding borrowings fluctuations that will occur over the remaining term of the Credit Facility. |
| |
| (c) | Kforce’s liability for unrecognized tax positions as of December 31, 20132014 was $0.4$0.3 million. This balance has been excluded from the table above due to the significant uncertainty with respect to expected settlements. |
| |
| (d) | Kforce has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to which eligible highly-compensated key employees may elect to defer part of their compensation to later years. These amounts, which are classified as other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, are payable based upon the elections of the plan participants (e.g. retirement, termination of employment, change-in-control). Amounts payable upon the retirement or termination of employment may become payable during the next five years if covered employees schedule a distribution, retire or terminate during that time. |
| |
| (e) | Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. Kforce currently has letters of credit totaling $2.7$3.2 million outstanding as security for workers’ compensation and property insurance policies, as well as facility lease deposits. Kforce maintains a sub-limit for letters of credit of $15$15.0 million under its Credit Facility. |
| |
| (f) | There is no funding requirement associated with the SERP or the SERHP.SERP. Kforce does not currently anticipate funding the SERP or SERHP during 2014.2015. Kforce has included the total undiscounted projected benefit payments, as determined at December 31, 2013,2014, in the table above. See Note 1211 – “Employee Benefit Plans” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail. |
| |
| (g) | Kforce has included the total undiscounted projected benefit payments, as determined at December 31, 20132014 in the table above. There is no funding requirement associated with this plan. |
Kforce has no material unrecorded commitments, losses, contingencies or guarantees associated with any related parties or unconsolidated entities.
Kforce is periodically subject to
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS audits, as well as state and other local income tax audits for various tax years. During
2013,2014, the IRS finished an examination of Kforce’s U.S. income tax return for
20092010 and 2011 with no material
adjustments, and no settlements. During 2013, the IRS commenced a Limited Issue Focused Exam of Kforce’s 2010 and 2011 U.S. income tax returns. No material liabilities are expected to result from this ongoing examination.adjustments. Although Kforce has not experienced any material liabilities in the past due to income tax audits, Kforce can make no assurances that this will continue.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In addition to the risks inherent in its operations, Kforce is exposed to certain market risks, primarily changes in interest rates.
As of December 31,
2013,2014, we had
$62.6$93.3 million outstanding under our Credit Facility. Our weighted average effective interest rate on our Credit Facility was
1.57%1.7% at December 31,
2013.2014. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates in effect at December 31,
20132014 would have an increase to Kforce’s annual interest expense of less than
$0.1$0.2 million.
We do not believe that we have a material exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies because our international operations represented
approximatelyless than 2% of net service revenues for the year ended December 31,
2013,2014, and because our international operations’ functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. However, Kforce will continue to assess the impact which currency fluctuations could have on our operations going forward.
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets of Kforce Inc. and subsidiaries (“Kforce”("Kforce") as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss), stockholders’ equity,Changes in Stockholders' Equity, and cash flowsCash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. We also have audited Kforce’sKforce's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control –- Integrated Framework (1992) (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Kforce’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on Kforce’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists,
and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
company’scompany's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
company’scompany's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
thatthat: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kforce Inc. and subsidiariesassubsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, Kforce maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the criteria established inInternal Control –- Integrated Framework (1992) (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
|
|
|
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
| Certified Public Accountants |
|
| Tampa, Florida |
February 27, 2014 |
| 2015 |
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Net service revenues | | $ | 1,151,887 | | | $ | 1,082,479 | | | $ | 1,004,747 | |
Direct costs of services | | | 782,275 | | | | 734,546 | | | | 687,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 369,612 | | | | 347,933 | | | | 317,747 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 323,933 | | | | 322,436 | | | | 274,072 | |
Goodwill impairment | | | 14,510 | | | | 69,158 | | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,846 | | | | 10,789 | | | | 12,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 21,323 | | | | (54,450 | ) | | | 31,170 | |
Other (income) expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | 1,302 | | | | 1,009 | | | | 1,196 | |
Other (income) expense | | | (77 | ) | | | 107 | | | | 60 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | 20,098 | | | | (55,566 | ) | | | 29,914 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 9,311 | | | | (19,854 | ) | | | 10,858 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 10,787 | | | | (35,712 | ) | | | 19,056 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | | — | | | | 22,009 | | | | 8,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 10,787 | | | | (13,703 | ) | | | 27,156 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans, net of tax | | | 3,030 | | | | 1,337 | | | | (2,570 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 13,817 | | | $ | (12,366 | ) | | $ | 24,586 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.50 | |
From discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.62 | | | $ | 0.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.49 | |
From discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.62 | | | $ | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | | | 33,511 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 37,835 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | | | 33,643 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 38,831 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Net service revenues | $ | 1,217,331 |
| | $ | 1,073,728 |
| | $ | 1,005,487 |
|
| Direct costs of services | 842,750 |
| | 729,352 |
| | 684,901 |
|
| Gross profit | 374,581 |
| | 344,376 |
| | 320,586 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 315,338 |
| | 307,944 |
| | 305,940 |
|
| Goodwill impairment | — |
| | 14,510 |
| | 69,158 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,894 |
| | 9,846 |
| | 10,789 |
|
| Income (loss) from operations | 49,349 |
| | 12,076 |
| | (65,301 | ) |
| Other expense (income): | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 1,411 |
| | 1,225 |
| | 954 |
|
| Other (income) expense | (19 | ) | | (78 | ) | | 103 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes | 47,957 |
| | 10,929 |
| | (66,358 | ) |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 18,559 |
| | 5,635 |
| | (24,227 | ) |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 29,398 |
| | 5,294 |
| | (42,131 | ) |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 61,517 |
| | 5,493 |
| | 28,428 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 90,915 |
| | 10,787 |
| | (13,703 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | |
| Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans, net of tax | (688 | ) | | 3,030 |
| | 1,337 |
|
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 90,227 |
| | $ | 13,817 |
| | $ | (12,366 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic: | | | | | |
| From continuing operations | $ | 0.94 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) |
| From discontinued operations | $ | 1.95 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic | $ | 2.89 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | | | | | |
| From continuing operations | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) |
| From discontinued operations | $ | 1.94 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 31,475 |
| | 33,511 |
| | 35,791 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 31,691 |
| | 33,643 |
| | 35,791 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 875 | | | $ | 1,381 | |
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $2,028 and $2,153, respectively | | | 179,095 | | | | 151,570 | |
Income tax refund receivable | | | 7,720 | | | | 1,750 | |
Deferred tax assets, net | | | 4,662 | | | | 9,494 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 10,534 | | | | 7,364 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 202,886 | | | | 171,559 | |
Fixed assets, net | | | 36,728 | | | | 34,883 | |
Other assets, net | | | 30,991 | | | | 28,038 | |
Deferred tax assets, net | | | 23,270 | | | | 21,523 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 4,993 | | | | 5,736 | |
Goodwill | | | 48,900 | | | | 63,410 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 347,768 | | | $ | 325,149 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | $ | 31,821 | | | $ | 36,205 | |
Accrued payroll costs | | | 56,872 | | | | 50,063 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 1,141 | | | | 11,564 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 139 | | | | 1,042 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 89,973 | | | | 98,874 | |
Long-term debt – credit facility | | | 62,642 | | | | 21,000 | |
Long-term debt – other | | | 1,364 | | | | 1,144 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 36,556 | | | | 34,285 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 190,535 | | | | 155,303 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 16) | | | | | | | | |
| | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par; 15,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par; 250,000 shares authorized, 69,480 and 68,531 issued, respectively | | | 695 | | | | 685 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 404,600 | | | | 400,688 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 317 | | | | (2,713 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 47,612 | | | | 40,203 | |
Treasury stock, at cost; 35,751 and 33,980 shares, respectively | | | (295,991 | ) | | | (269,017 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 157,233 | | | | 169,846 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 347,768 | | | $ | 325,149 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| ASSETS | | | |
| Current Assets: | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,238 |
| | $ | 875 |
|
| Trade receivables, net of allowances of $2,040 and $2,028, respectively | 204,710 |
| | 179,095 |
|
| Income tax refund receivable | 3,311 |
| | 7,720 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | 4,980 |
| | 4,662 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 10,170 |
| | 10,534 |
|
| Total current assets | 224,409 |
| | 202,886 |
|
| Fixed assets, net | 35,330 |
| | 36,728 |
|
| Other assets, net | 30,349 |
| | 30,991 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | 22,855 |
| | 23,270 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 5,011 |
| | 4,993 |
|
| Goodwill | 45,968 |
| | 48,900 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 363,922 |
| | $ | 347,768 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
| Current Liabilities: | | | |
| Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | $ | 38,104 |
| | $ | 31,821 |
|
| Accrued payroll costs | 52,208 |
| | 56,872 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 986 |
| | 1,141 |
|
| Income taxes payable | 2,885 |
| | 139 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 94,183 |
| | 89,973 |
|
| Long-term debt – credit facility | 93,333 |
| | 62,642 |
|
| Long-term debt – other | 562 |
| | 1,364 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 36,456 |
| | 36,556 |
|
| Total liabilities | 224,534 |
| | 190,535 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15) |
| |
|
| Stockholders’ Equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par; 15,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par; 250,000 shares authorized, 70,029 and 69,480 issued, respectively | 700 |
| | 695 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 412,642 |
| | 404,600 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (371 | ) | | 317 |
|
| Retained earnings | 125,378 |
| | 47,612 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost; 40,616 and 35,751 shares, respectively | (398,961 | ) | | (295,991 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 139,388 |
| | 157,233 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 363,922 |
| | $ | 347,768 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Common stock – shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares at beginning of period | | | 68,531 | | | | 68,566 | | | | 66,542 | |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | | | 882 | | | | (105 | ) | | | 1,604 | |
Exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights | | | 67 | | | | 70 | | | | 420 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares at end of period | | | 69,480 | | | | 68,531 | | | | 68,566 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock – par value: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 685 | | | $ | 686 | | | $ | 665 | |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | | | 9 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 16 | |
Exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 695 | | | $ | 685 | | | $ | 686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additional paid-in capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 400,688 | | | $ | 372,212 | | | $ | 355,869 | |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | | | 72 | | | | 36 | | | | (16 | ) |
Exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights | | | 597 | | | | 736 | | | | 2,854 | |
Income tax benefit from stock-based compensation | | | 399 | | | | 1,201 | | | | 1,216 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 2,570 | | | | 26,243 | | | | 11,976 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | | | 274 | | | | 260 | | | | 313 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 404,600 | | | $ | 400,688 | | | $ | 372,212 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | (2,713 | ) | | $ | (4,050 | ) | | $ | (1,480 | ) |
Pension and postretirement plans, net of tax of $1,919, $854 and $1,532, respectively | | | 3,030 | | | | 1,337 | | | | (2,570 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 317 | | | $ | (2,713 | ) | | $ | (4,050 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 40,203 | | | $ | 89,135 | | | $ | 61,979 | |
Net income (loss) | | | 10,787 | | | | (13,703 | ) | | | 27,156 | |
Dividend ($0.10, $1.00 and $0.00 per share, respectively) | | | (3,378 | ) | | | (35,229 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 47,612 | | | $ | 40,203 | | | $ | 89,135 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock – shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares at beginning of period | | | 33,980 | | | | 30,644 | | | | 24,823 | |
Repurchases of common stock | | | 1,812 | | | | 3,376 | | | | 5,746 | |
Shares tendered in payment of the exercise price of stock options | | | — | | | | 11 | | | | 131 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | | | (41 | ) | | | (51 | ) | | | (56 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares at end of period | | | 35,751 | | | | 33,980 | | | | 30,644 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock – cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | (269,017 | ) | | $ | (224,868 | ) | | $ | (163,216 | ) |
Repurchases of common stock | | | (27,313 | ) | | | (44,375 | ) | | | (59,643 | ) |
Shares tendered in payment of the exercise price of stock options | | | — | | | | (161 | ) | | | (2,401 | ) |
Employee stock purchase plan | | | 339 | | | | 387 | | | | 392 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | (295,991 | ) | | $ | (269,017 | ) | | $ | (224,868 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Common stock – shares: | | | | | |
| Shares at beginning of period | 69,480 |
| | 68,531 |
| | 68,566 |
|
| Issuance for stock-based compensation and dividends, net of forfeitures | 444 |
| | 882 |
| | (105 | ) |
| Exercise of stock options | 105 |
| | 67 |
| | 70 |
|
| Shares at end of period | 70,029 |
| | 69,480 |
| | 68,531 |
|
| Common stock – par value: | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 695 |
| | $ | 685 |
| | $ | 686 |
|
| Issuance for stock-based compensation and dividends, net of forfeitures | 4 |
| | 9 |
| | (1 | ) |
| Exercise of stock options | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | 700 |
| | $ | 695 |
| | $ | 685 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital: | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 404,600 |
| | $ | 400,688 |
| | $ | 372,212 |
|
| Issuance for stock-based compensation and dividends, net of forfeitures | 369 |
| | 72 |
| | 36 |
|
| Exercise of stock options | 1,213 |
| | 597 |
| | 736 |
|
| Income tax benefit from stock-based compensation | 595 |
| | 399 |
| | 1,201 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 5,475 |
| | 2,570 |
| | 26,243 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | 390 |
| | 274 |
| | 260 |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | 412,642 |
| | $ | 404,600 |
| | $ | 400,688 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 317 |
| | $ | (2,713 | ) | | $ | (4,050 | ) |
| Pension and post-retirement plans, net of tax of $394, $1,919 and $854, respectively | (688 | ) | | 3,030 |
| | 1,337 |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | (371 | ) | | $ | 317 |
| | $ | (2,713 | ) |
| Retained earnings: | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 47,612 |
| | $ | 40,203 |
| | $ | 89,135 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 90,915 |
| | 10,787 |
| | (13,703 | ) |
| Dividends, net of forfeitures ($0.41, $0.10 and $1.00 per share, respectively) | (13,149 | ) | | (3,378 | ) | | (35,229 | ) |
| Balance at end of period | $ | 125,378 |
| | $ | 47,612 |
| | $ | 40,203 |
|
| Treasury stock – shares: | | | | | |
| Shares at beginning of period | 35,751 |
| | 33,980 |
| | 30,644 |
|
| Repurchases of common stock | 4,896 |
| | 1,812 |
| | 3,376 |
|
| Shares tendered in payment of the exercise price of stock options | 4 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | (35 | ) | | (41 | ) | | (51 | ) |
| Shares at end of period | 40,616 |
| | 35,751 |
| | 33,980 |
|
| Treasury stock – cost: | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | (295,991 | ) | | $ | (269,017 | ) | | $ | (224,868 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock | (103,195 | ) | | (27,313 | ) | | (44,375 | ) |
| Shares tendered in payment of the exercise price of stock options | (84 | ) | | — |
| | (161 | ) |
| Employee stock purchase plan | 309 |
| | 339 |
| | 387 |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | (398,961 | ) | | $ | (295,991 | ) | | $ | (269,017 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | 27,156 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | | — | | | | (36,418 | ) | | | — | |
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment | | | 14,510 | | | | 69,158 | | | | — | |
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision, net | | | 1,166 | | | | (17,136 | ) | | | 653 | |
Provision for (recovery of) bad debts on accounts receivable and other accounts receivable reserves | | | 546 | | | | 1,860 | | | | (925 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 9,846 | | | | 10,862 | | | | 12,694 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 2,570 | | | | 25,740 | | | | 11,976 | |
Pension and postretirement benefit plans expense | | | 3,237 | | | | 4,505 | | | | 4,369 | |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 90 | | | | 92 | | | | 139 | |
Tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | | | 399 | | | | 1,201 | | | | 1,216 | |
Excess tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | | | (110 | ) | | | (1,130 | ) | | | (878 | ) |
Deferred compensation liability increase (decrease), net | | | 3,994 | | | | 2,111 | | | | (634 | ) |
(Gain) loss on cash surrender value of Company-owned life insurance | | | (3,690 | ) | | | (1,797 | ) | | | 1,733 | |
Other | | | 257 | | | | 55 | | | | 251 | |
(Increase) decrease in operating assets, net of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade receivables, net | | | (28,071 | ) | | | 4,298 | | | | (25,332 | ) |
Income tax refund receivable | | | (5,970 | ) | | | (1,500 | ) | | | 5,425 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (3,170 | ) | | | (2,246 | ) | | | (380 | ) |
Other assets, net | | | (57 | ) | | | 244 | | | | 75 | |
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other current liabilities | | | (12,471 | ) | | | 10,913 | | | | (4,576 | ) |
Accrued payroll costs | | | 7,422 | | | | (241 | ) | | | 1,395 | |
Income taxes payable | | | (903 | ) | | | 807 | | | | (15 | ) |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 83 | | | | (1,697 | ) | | | (3,102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operating activities | | | 465 | | | | 55,978 | | | | 31,240 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (8,145 | ) | | | (5,846 | ) | | | (6,495 | ) |
Proceeds from disposition of business, net of cash | | | — | | | | 55,446 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from the sale of assets held within the Rabbi Trust | | | 3,278 | | | | 4,259 | | | | — | |
Purchase of assets held within the Rabbi Trust | | | (3,697 | ) | | | (1,460 | ) | | | (3,440 | ) |
Other | | | 17 | | | | 6 | | | | (155 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | | (8,547 | ) | | | 52,405 | | | | (10,090 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from bank line of credit | | | 591,688 | | | | 241,973 | | | | 488,468 | |
Payments on bank line of credit | | | (550,081 | ) | | | (270,499 | ) | | | (449,767 | ) |
Payments of capital expenditure financing | | | (1,452 | ) | | | (1,802 | ) | | | (1,497 | ) |
Payments of deferred loan financing costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (450 | ) |
Short-term vendor financing | | | (180 | ) | | | 253 | | | | 287 | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 598 | | | | 575 | | | | 458 | |
Excess tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | | | 110 | | | | 1,130 | | | | 878 | |
Repurchases of common stock | | | (29,810 | ) | | | (44,375 | ) | | | (59,643 | ) |
Cash dividend | | | (3,297 | ) | | | (35,196 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 7,576 | | | | (107,941 | ) | | | (21,266 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (506 | ) | | | 442 | | | | (116 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 1,381 | | | | 939 | | | | 1,055 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 875 | | | $ | 1,381 | | | $ | 939 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 90,915 |
| | $ | 10,787 |
| | $ | (13,703 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations | (64,600 | ) | | — |
| | (36,418 | ) |
| Goodwill impairment | — |
| | 14,510 |
| | 69,158 |
|
| Deferred income tax provision (benefit), net | 491 |
| | 1,166 |
| | (17,136 | ) |
| Provision for bad debts on accounts receivable | 825 |
| | 546 |
| | 1,860 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 10,058 |
| | 9,846 |
| | 10,862 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 3,028 |
| | 2,570 |
| | 25,740 |
|
| Pension and post-retirement benefit plans expense | 1,424 |
| | 3,237 |
| | 4,505 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 105 |
| | 90 |
| | 92 |
|
| Tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | 595 |
| | 399 |
| | 1,201 |
|
| Excess tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | — |
| | (110 | ) | | (1,130 | ) |
| Deferred compensation liability increase, net | 1,482 |
| | 3,994 |
| | 2,111 |
|
| Gain on cash surrender value of Company-owned life insurance | (1,036 | ) | | (3,690 | ) | | (1,797 | ) |
| Gain from Company-owned life insurance proceeds | (849 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | (152 | ) | | 257 |
| | 55 |
|
| (Increase) decrease in operating assets | | | | | |
| Trade receivables, net | (40,339 | ) | | (28,071 | ) | | 4,298 |
|
| Income tax refund receivable | 4,409 |
| | (5,970 | ) | | (1,500 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 530 |
| | (3,170 | ) | | (2,246 | ) |
| Other assets, net | (27 | ) | | (57 | ) | | 244 |
|
| Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and other current liabilities | 5,653 |
| | (12,471 | ) | | 10,913 |
|
| Accrued payroll costs | (248 | ) | | 7,422 |
| | (241 | ) |
| Income taxes payable | (35,529 | ) | | (903 | ) | | 807 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | (2,317 | ) | | 83 |
| | (1,697 | ) |
| Cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (25,582 | ) | | 465 |
| | 55,978 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (6,011 | ) | | (8,145 | ) | | (5,846 | ) |
| Acquisition, net of cash received | (2,611 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from disposition of business | 117,887 |
| | — |
| | 55,446 |
|
| Proceeds from the disposition of assets held within the Rabbi Trust | 2,668 |
| | 3,278 |
| | 4,259 |
|
| Purchase of assets held within the Rabbi Trust | (2,436 | ) | | (3,697 | ) | | (1,460 | ) |
| Proceeds from Company-owned life insurance | 1,037 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | 1 |
| | 17 |
| | 6 |
|
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 110,535 |
| | (8,547 | ) | | 52,405 |
|
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Proceeds from bank line of credit | 684,427 |
| | 591,688 |
| | 241,973 |
|
| Payments on bank line of credit | (653,701 | ) | | (550,081 | ) | | (270,499 | ) |
| Payments of capital expenditure financing | (1,280 | ) | | (1,452 | ) | | (1,802 | ) |
| Payments of loan financing costs | (460 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Short-term vendor financing | (160 | ) | | (180 | ) | | 253 |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of shares tendered in payment of exercise | 1,131 |
| | 598 |
| | 575 |
|
| Excess tax benefit attributable to stock-based compensation | — |
| | 110 |
| | 1,130 |
|
| Repurchases of common stock | (101,771 | ) | | (29,810 | ) | | (44,375 | ) |
| Cash dividend | (12,776 | ) | | (3,297 | ) | | (35,196 | ) |
| Cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (84,590 | ) | | 7,576 |
| | (107,941 | ) |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | 363 |
| | (506 | ) | | 442 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 875 |
| | 1,381 |
| | 939 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 1,238 |
| | $ | 875 |
| | $ | 1,381 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Nature of Operations
Kforce Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, “Kforce”) provide professional staffing services and solutions to customers in the following segments: Technology (“Tech”), Finance and Accounting (“FA”),
Health Information Management (“HIM”) and Government Solutions (“GS”). Kforce provides flexible staffing services and solutions on both a temporary and full-time basis. Kforce operates through its corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida and 62 field offices located throughout the United
States (the “U.S.”).States. Additionally, one of our subsidiaries, Kforce Global Solutions, Inc. (“Global”), provides information technology outsourcing services internationally through an office in Manila, Philippines. Our international operations comprised
approximatelyless than 2% of net service revenues for each of the three years ended December 31,
20132014 and are included in our Tech segment.
Kforce serves clients from the Fortune 1000, the Federal Government, state and local governments, local and regional companies and small to mid-sized companies.
The consolidated financial statements of Kforce have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”GAAP") and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation for amounts related to discontinued operations (see Note 2 - “Discontinued Operations” for further information on the discontinued operations).
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kforce Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. References in this document to “Kforce,” “the Company,” “we,
” “the Firm,” “our” or “us” refer to Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where the context indicates otherwise.
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most important of these estimates and assumptions relate to the following:
allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves; accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets and any related impairment;
stock-based compensation; obligations for pension and postretirement benefit plans; self-insured liabilities for workers’ compensation and health insurance;
allowancestock-based compensation; obligations for
doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reservespension plans and accounting for income taxes. Although these and other estimates and assumptions are based on the best available information, actual results could be materially different from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Kforce classifies all highly liquid investments with an original initial maturity of three months or less as cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand with banks, either in commercial accounts, or overnight interest-bearing money market accounts and at times may exceed federally insured limits. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short duration of their maturities.
Accounts Receivable Reserves
Kforce establishes its reserves for expected credit losses, fallouts, early payment discounts and revenue adjustments based on past experience and estimates of potential future activity. Specific to our allowance for doubtful accounts, which comprises a majority of our accounts receivable reserves, Kforce performs an ongoing analysis of factors including recent write-off and delinquency trends, a specific analysis of significant receivable balances that are past due, the concentration of accounts receivable among clients and higher-risk sectors, and the current state of the U.S. economy. Trade receivables are written off by Kforce after all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted.
Accounts receivable reserves as a percentage of gross accounts receivable was
1.1%1.0% and
1.4%1.1% as of December 31,
20132014 and December 31,
2012,2013, respectively.
Kforce considers amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, delivery has occurred, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. We earn revenues from two primary sources: Flexible billings and Search fees.
Flexible billings are recognized as the services are provided by Kforce’s temporary employees, who are Kforce’s legal employees while they are working on assignments. Kforce pays all relatedFlexible Consultants. Net service revenues represent services rendered to customers less credits, discounts, rebates and revenue-related reserves. Revenues include reimbursements of travel and out-of-pocket expenses (“billable expenses”) with equivalent amounts of expense recorded in direct costs of such employment, including workers’ compensation insurance, state and federal unemployment taxes, social security and certain fringe benefits. services.
Search fees are recognized by Kforce when employment candidates accept offers of permanent employment and are scheduled to commence employment within 30 days. Kforce records revenues net of an estimated reserve for “fallouts,” which is based on Kforce’s historical fallout experience. Fallouts occur when a candidate does not remain employed with the client through the contingency period, which is typically 90 days or less.
Net service revenues represent services rendered to customers less credits, discounts, rebates and allowances. Revenues include reimbursements of travel and out-of-pocket expenses (“billable expenses”) with equivalent amounts of expense recorded in direct costs of services.
Our GS segment generates its revenues under contracts that are, in general, greater in duration than our other segments and which can often span several years, inclusive of renewal periods.
In addition, our GS segment generates substantially all of its revenues under time-and-materials (which account for the majority of this segment’s contracts), fixed-price and cost-plus arrangements. Our GS segment does not generate any Search fees.
Except as provided below, Kforce considers amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.Our GS segment generates revenues under the following contract arrangements.Revenues for time-and-materials contracts, which accounts for approximately 73%69% of this segment’s revenue, are recorded based on contractually established billing rates at the time services are provided.
Revenues on fixed-price contracts are recognized on the basis of the estimated percentage-of-completion. Approximately 15%20% of this segment’s revenues are recognized under this method. Progress towards completion is typically measured based on costs incurred as a proportion of estimated total costs or other measures of progress when applicable. Profit in a given period is reported at the expected profit margin to be achieved on the overall contract.
Revenue on cost-plus arrangements is recognized based on allowable costs incurred plus an estimate of the applicable fees earned. Approximately 12%11% of this segment’s revenues are recognized under these arrangements.
Direct costs of services are composed
primarily of
all related costs of employment for its Flexible Consultants, including payroll wages, payroll taxes, payroll-related insurance
for Kforce’s flexible employees, and
certain fringe benefits, as well as subcontractor costs.
Direct costs of permanent placement services primarily consist of reimbursable expenses. Direct costs of services exclude depreciation and amortization expense, which is presented on a separate line in the accompanying
consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of
operationsOperations and
comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Kforce accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach to the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Unless it is
“moremore likely than
not”not that a deferred tax asset can be utilized to offset future taxes, a valuation allowance is recorded against that asset. The tax benefits of deductions attributable to employees’ disqualifying dispositions of shares obtained from incentive stock options, exercises of non-qualified stock options, and vesting of restricted stock are reflected as increases in additional paid-in capital.
Kforce evaluates tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in its tax returns, and records a liability for uncertain tax positions. Kforce uses a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. First, tax positions are recognized if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. Second, tax positions are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Kforce recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the
provision for income
taxestax expense (benefit) in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Fair Value Measurements
Kforce uses the framework established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for measuring fair value and disclosures about fair value measurements.
Kforce uses fair value measurements in areas that include, but are not limited to: the impairment testing of goodwill and
intangible and long-lived assets;
share-basedstock-based compensation arrangements; valuing the investment in
bond mutualmoney market funds within
the Kforce’s deferred compensation plan;
and our
debt and capital lease obligations.contingent liability. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, Kforce has determined the estimated fair value measurements; however, considerable judgment is required in interpreting data to develop the estimates of fair value.
Fixed assets are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the related leases, which generally range from three to five years.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Kforce performs a goodwill impairment analysis, using the two-step analysis method, on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable unless it is determined, based upon a review of the qualitative factors of a reporting unit, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, including goodwill. Under the two-step analysis method, the recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which Kforce has determined to be consistent with its operating segments; by comparing the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair market value of the reporting unit. Kforce determines the fair market value of its reporting units based on a weighting of the present value of projected future cash flows (the “income approach”) and the use of comparative market
approachapproaches under both the guideline company method and guideline transaction method (collectively, the “market approach”). Fair market value using the income approach is based on Kforce’s estimated future cash flows on a discounted basis. The market approach compares each of Kforce’s reporting units to other comparable companies based on valuation multiples derived from operational and transactional data to arrive at a fair value. Factors requiring significant judgment include, among others, the
assumptions related to discount rates, forecasted operating results, long-term growth rates, the determination of comparable companies,
assumptions related to forecasted operating results, discount rates, long-term growth rates, and market multiples. Changes in economic or operating conditions, or changes in Kforce’s business strategies, that occur after the annual impairment analysis and which impact these assumptions, may result in a future goodwill impairment charge, which could be material to Kforce’s consolidated financial statements.
Identifiable intangible assets arising from certain of Kforce’s acquisitions include non-compete and employment agreements, contractual relationships, customer contracts,
technology, and a trade name and trademark. For definite-lived intangible assets, Kforce has determined that the straight-line method is an appropriate methodology to allocate the cost over the period of expected benefit, which ranges from one to
15fifteen years. The impairment evaluation for indefinite-lived intangible assets, which for Kforce
consistconsists of a trademark and trade name, is conducted on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Kforce reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by those assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment charge recognized is the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets, as determined based on the present value of projected future cash flows.
Kforce purchases, develops, and implements new computer software to enhance the performance of our
Company-wide technology infrastructure. Direct internal costs, such as payroll and payroll-related costs, and external costs incurred during the development stage of each project, are capitalized and classified as capitalized software. Kforce capitalized development-stage implementation costs of
$970, $1,718$0.4 million, $1.0 million and
$2,876$1.7 million during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, respectively. Capitalized software development costs are classified as other assets, net in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized over the estimated useful lives of the software, which range from one to five years, using the straight-line method.
Our associates make placements and earn commissions as a percentage of
actual revenues (for Search revenue) or gross profit (for Flex revenue) pursuant to a calendar-year-basis commission plan. The amount of commissions paid as a percentage of revenues or gross profit increases as volume increases. Kforce accrues commissions for
actual revenues or gross profit at a percentage equal to the percent of total expected commissions payable to total revenues or gross profit for the year, as applicable.
Kforce accounts for stock-based compensation by measuring the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost is recognized over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.
Kforce retains the economic burden for the first $250
thousand per occurrence in workers’ compensation claims except:
(i)(1) in states that require participation in state-operated insurance funds and
(ii)(2) for its GS segment which is fully insured for workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation includes ongoing health care and indemnity coverage for claims and may be paid over numerous years following the date of injury. Workers’ compensation expense includes insurance premiums paid, claims administration fees charged by Kforce’s workers’ compensation administrator, premiums paid to state-operated insurance funds and an estimate for Kforce’s liability for
Incurred but Not Reported (“IBNR”)IBNR claims and for the ongoing development of existing claims.
Kforce estimates its workers’ compensation liability based upon historical claims experience, actuarially determined loss development factors, and qualitative considerations such as claims management activities.
Taxes Assessed by Governmental Agencies – Revenue Producing Transactions
Kforce collects sales tax for various taxing authorities and it is our policy to record these amounts on a net basis; thus, sales tax amounts are not included in net service revenues.
Except for certain fully insured health insurance lines of coverage, Kforce retains the risk of loss for each health insurance plan participant up to $275
thousand in claims annually. Additionally, for all claim amounts exceeding $275
thousand, Kforce retains the risk of loss up to an aggregate annual loss of those claims of
$500.$500 thousand. For its partially self-insured lines of coverage, health insurance costs are accrued using estimates to approximate the liability for reported claims and IBNR claims, which are primarily based upon an evaluation of historical claims experience, actuarially-determined completion factors and a qualitative review of our health insurance exposure including the extent of outstanding claims and expected changes in health insurance costs.
Accounting for
PostretirementPension Benefits
Kforce recognizes the
overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit
postretirementpension plans as
an asset ora liability in its
consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income (loss). Kforce also measures the funded status of the defined benefit
postretirementpension plans as of the date of its fiscal year-end, with limited exceptions.
Amortization of a net unrecognized gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included as a component of net periodic benefit cost
and net periodic postretirement benefit cost if, as of the beginning of the year, that net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the
greater of the projected
benefit obligation or accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. If amortization is required, the minimum amortization shall be that excess divided by the average remaining service period of active plan participants.
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed as earnings (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic weighted average shares outstanding excludes unvested shares of restricted stock. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of stock options and other potentially dilutive securities such as unvested shares of restricted stock using the treasury stock method, except where the effect of including potential common shares would be anti-dilutive. Weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted earnings per common share excludes contingently issuable unvested restricted stock unless the performance condition has been achieved as of the end of the applicable reporting period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three years ended December 31
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | (35,712 | ) | | $ | 19,056 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | — | | | | 22,009 | | | | 8,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 10,787 | | | $ | (13,703 | ) | | $ | 27,156 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | | | 33,511 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 37,835 | |
Common stock equivalents | | | 132 | | | | — | | | | 996 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | | | 33,643 | | | | 35,791 | | | | 38,831 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.50 | |
From discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 0.62 | | | | 0.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – basic | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From continuing operations | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (1.00 | ) | | $ | 0.49 | |
From discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 0.62 | | | | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | (0.38 | ) | | $ | 0.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 29,398 |
| | $ | 5,294 |
| | $ | (42,131 | ) |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | 61,517 |
| | 5,493 |
| | 28,428 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 90,915 |
| | $ | 10,787 |
| | $ | (13,703 | ) |
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 31,475 |
| | 33,511 |
| | 35,791 |
|
| Common stock equivalents | 216 |
| | 132 |
| | — |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 31,691 |
| | 33,643 |
| | 35,791 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic: | | | | | |
| From continuing operations | $ | 0.94 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) |
| From discontinued operations | 1.95 |
| | 0.16 |
| | 0.80 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – basic | $ | 2.89 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted: | | | | | |
| From continuing operations | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | (1.18 | ) |
| From discontinued operations | 1.94 |
| | 0.16 |
| | 0.80 |
|
| Earnings (loss) per share – diluted | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.38 | ) |
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no shares of common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the year ended December 31,
2011, the total weighted average awards to purchase or receive2012, there were 33
thousand shares of common stock
was not included inexcluded from the computation of
diluteddilutive earnings per share because
thesetheir inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. Given that Kforce had a loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2012, the calculation of diluted loss per share from continuing operations, earnings from discontinued operations, and net loss is computed using basic weighted average common shares outstanding.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, there were no shares of common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
Kforce’s Board of Directors (“Board”) may authorize share repurchases of Kforce’s common stock. Shares repurchased under Board authorizations are held in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under various employee
share-basedstock-based award plans. Treasury shares are accounted for under the cost method and reported as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents the net after-tax impact of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses related to:
(i)(1) the supplemental executive retirement plan
and supplemental executive retirement health plan, both of which
covercovers a limited number of executives and
(ii)(2) a defined benefit plan covering all eligible employees in our Philippine operations. Because each of these plans is unfunded as of December 31,
2013,2014, the actuarial gains and losses arise as a result of the actuarial experience of the plans, as well as changes in actuarial assumptions in measuring the associated obligation as of year-end, or an interim date if any re-measurement is necessary. This information is provided in our
consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of
operationsOperations and
comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Kforce’s Board may, at its discretion, declare and pay dividends on the outstanding shares of Kforce’s common stock out of retained earnings, subject to statutory requirements. Dividends for any outstanding and unvested restricted stock as of the record date are awarded in the form of additional shares of
forfeitable restricted stock, at the same rate as the cash dividend on common stock and based on the closing stock price
andon the record date. Such additional shares have the same vesting terms
and conditions as the outstanding and unvested restricted stock. The following summarizes the cash dividends declared for the three years ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Cash dividends declared per share | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | | — | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
|
Kforce currently expects to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to its December 20132014 dividend of $0.10$0.11 per share. However, the declarationamount and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by Kforce’s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of the Firm’s financial performance.performance and legal ability to pay.
In July 2013,August 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding presentationdisclosure of uncertainties about an unrecognized tax benefitentity’s ability to continue as a going concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. This guidance is to be applied for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter, and early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate a material impact to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers, which specifies that revenue should be recognized when
a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss,promised goods or
a tax credit carryforward exists.services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15,
20132016 and interim periods within those annual
periods.periods and will require enhanced disclosures. Kforce
doesis currently evaluating the potential impact of the accounting and disclosure requirements on the consolidated financial statements; we do not
expect the adoption of this guidance to havecurrently anticipate a material impact
on its futureto the consolidated financial
statements.statements upon adoption.
In April 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity, which specifies additional thresholds for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. Kforce elected not to adopt this standard early.
2. Discontinued Operations
Effective August 3, 2014, Kforce sold to RCM Acquisition, Inc. (the “Purchaser”), under a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “HIM SPA”) dated August 4, 2014, all of the issued and outstanding stock of KHI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kforce Inc. and operator of the former HIM reporting segment, for a total cash purchase price of $119.0 million plus a post-closing working capital adjustment of $96 thousand.
In connection with the sale, Kforce entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “HIM TSA”) with the Purchaser to provide certain post-closing transitional services for a period not to exceed 12 months. The fees for these services will be generally equivalent to Kforce’s cost, and additional services may be provided at negotiated rates. Although the services provided under the HIM TSA generate continuing cash flows between Kforce and the Purchaser, the amounts are not considered to be direct cash flows of the discontinued operation nor are they significant to the ongoing operations of either entity. Kforce has no contractual ability through the HIM TSA, HIM SPA or any other agreement to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of the Purchaser. As a result, Kforce has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of KHI and, as such, has classified the operating results of the former HIM reporting segment as discontinued operations.
In accordance with and defined within the HIM SPA, Kforce is obligated to indemnify the Purchaser for certain losses, as defined, in excess of $1.19 million, although this deductible does not apply to certain specified losses. Kforce’s obligations under the indemnification provisions of the HIM SPA, with the exception of certain items, ceased 18 months after the sale closed and are, in some cases, limited to an aggregate of $8.925 million; this only applies to certain specified losses. While it cannot be certain, Kforce believes any material exposure under the indemnification provisions is remote and, as a result, has not recorded a liability as of December 31, 2014.
The total financial results of HIM have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The following summarizes the revenues and pretax profits of HIM for the three years ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Net service revenues | | $ | 56,670 |
| | $ | 78,159 |
| | $ | 76,992 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, before income taxes | | $ | 103,512 |
| | $ | 9,169 |
| | $ | 10,792 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the income from discontinued operations included a gain, net of transaction costs, on the sale of discontinued operations of $94.3 million pretax, or $56.1 million after tax. The transaction costs primarily included legal fees, stock-based compensation related to the acceleration of restricted stock, commissions and transaction bonuses in the form of cash and common stock, which, in the aggregate, totaled $11.0 million. Stock-based compensation related to acceleration of restricted stock and transaction bonuses paid in stock in lieu of cash was $2.4 million. Kforce utilized the proceeds from the sale of HIM initially to pay down the outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility and ultimately to repurchase shares of common stock.
Certain of the assets and liabilities pertaining to the discontinued operations of HIM as of the closing date were sold to or assumed by the Purchaser, and deconsolidated from Kforce. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2013 related to the discontinued operation, including those not sold to or assumed by the Purchaser (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | December 31, 2013 |
| Assets: | |
| Trade receivables | $ | 11,755 |
|
| Goodwill | 4,887 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 219 |
|
| Fixed assets, net | 162 |
|
| Other assets, net | 88 |
|
| Total assets | 17,111 |
|
| Liabilities: | |
| Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | 712 |
|
| Accrued payroll costs | 4,177 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 868 |
|
| Total liabilities | 5,757 |
|
| Net assets | $ | 11,354 |
|
On March 17, 2012, Kforce entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the
“SPA”“KCR SPA”) to sell all of the issued and outstanding stock of
Kforce Clinical Research, Inc. (“KCR”)KCR to inVentiv Health, Inc. (“
Purchaser”inVentiv”). On March 31, 2012,
(“Closing Date”), the Firm closed the sale of KCR to the Purchaser for a total cash purchase price of
$57,335,$57.3 million, after giving effect to a
$7,335$7.3 million post-closing working capital adjustment.
In connection with the closing of the sale,
Kforce
also entered into a Transition Services Agreement
(“(the “KCR TSA”) with
the PurchaserinVentiv to provide certain post-closing transitional services for a period not to exceed 18
months from the Closing Date.months' time. Services provided by Kforce under the
KCR TSA ceased during the three months ended June 30,
2013.The2013. The fees for a significant majority of these services were generally equivalent to Kforce’s cost.
In accordance with the
KCR SPA, Kforce was obligated to indemnify
the PurchaserinVentiv for certain losses, as defined, in excess of $375
thousand although this deductible did not apply to certain losses. Kforce’s obligations under the indemnification provisions of the
KCR SPA, with the exception of certain items, ceased 18 months
fromafter the
Closing Datesale closed and were limited to an aggregate of
$5,000$5.0 million, although this cap did not apply to certain losses.
While it cannot be certain, Kforce believes any exposure under the indemnification provisions is remote, particularly given that the 18
monthmonths time period for general indemnification claims has now passed, and, as a result, Kforce has not recorded a liability as of December 31,
2013.2014. The financial results of KCR have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss). The following summarizes the results from discontinued operationsrevenues and pretax profits of KCR for the two yearsyear ended December 31:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Net service revenues | | $ | 29,808 | | | $ | 106,172 | |
Direct costs of services and operating expenses | | | 26,491 | | | | 92,775 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,317 | | | | 13,397 | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | | 36,418 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations, before income taxes | | | 39,735 | | | | 13,397 | |
Income tax expense | | | 17,726 | | | | 5,297 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | $ | 22,009 | | | $ | 8,100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Additionally, in connection with the servicing of the TSA, approximately $2,658 was due to the Purchaser from Kforce as of December 31, 2012 and is classified within accounts payable and other accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. This was paid during 2013.
Acceleration of Equity Awards
(in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | December 31, 2012 |
| Net service revenues | $ | 29,808 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, before income taxes | $ | 39,735 |
|
In connection with the disposition of KCR, as described above, the Board exercised its discretion, as permitted within the Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, to accelerate the vesting, for tax planning purposes, of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and alternative long-term incentive awards (“ALTI”)ALTI effective March 31, 2012. Kforce recognized a tax benefit from the acceleration of the vesting of restricted stock and ALTI. The acceleration resulted in the recognition of previously unrecognized compensation expense during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 of $31,297,$31.3 million, which included $784$0.8 million of payroll taxes. This expense was classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Income tax expense as a percentage of income from discontinued operations,
before income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and
comprehensive income (loss).2012 was 40.6%, 40.1% and 43.7%, respectively.
Major classifications of fixed assets and related useful lives are summarized as
follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | USEFUL LIFE | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Land | | | | | | $ | 5,892 | | | $ | 5,892 | |
Building and improvements | | | 5-40 years | | | | 25,191 | | | | 25,121 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 5-7 years | | | | 9,701 | | | | 8,232 | |
Computer equipment | | | 3-5 years | | | | 8,966 | | | | 7,269 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 3-5 years | | | | 6,894 | | | | 4,720 | |
Capital leases | | | 3-5 years | | | | 4,306 | | | | 5,902 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 60,950 | | | | 57,136 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | (24,222 | ) | | | (22,253 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 36,728 | | | $ | 34,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | DECEMBER 31, |
| | USEFUL LIFE | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Land | | | $ | 5,892 |
| | $ | 5,892 |
|
| Building and improvements | 5-40 years | | 25,304 |
| | 25,191 |
|
| Furniture and equipment | 5-10 years | | 10,881 |
| | 9,701 |
|
| Computer equipment | 3-5 years | | 6,618 |
| | 8,966 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 3-5 years | | 8,347 |
| | 6,894 |
|
| Capital leases | 3-5 years | | 3,762 |
| | 4,306 |
|
| | | | 60,804 |
| | 60,950 |
|
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (25,474 | ) | | (24,222 | ) |
| | | | $ | 35,330 |
| | $ | 36,728 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
was $6.3 million, $5.9 million and
2011 was $5,863, $5,368 and $5,826,$5.4 million, respectively.
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the
following: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | 7,119 | | | $ | (1,238 | ) | | $ | 8,784 | |
State | | | 1,026 | | | | (1,097 | ) | | | 1,244 | |
Deferred | | | 1,166 | | | | (17,519 | ) | | | 830 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,311 | | | $ | (19,854 | ) | | $ | 10,858 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 15,782 |
| | $ | 4,140 |
| | $ | (4,371 | ) |
| State | 2,527 |
| | 449 |
| | (1,716 | ) |
| Deferred | 250 |
| | 1,046 |
| | (18,140 | ) |
| | $ | 18,559 |
| | $ | 5,635 |
| | $ | (24,227 | ) |
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations shown above varied from the statutory federal income tax rate for those periods as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Federal income tax rate | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % |
State income taxes, net of Federal tax effect | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.7 | | | | 3.3 | |
Non-deductible goodwill impairment | | | 2.4 | | | | (4.1 | ) | | | — | |
Non-deductible meals and entertainment | | | 2.9 | | | | (0.7 | ) | | | 1.0 | |
Other | | | 1.8 | | | | 0.8 | | | | (3.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective tax rate | | | 46.3 | % | | | 35.7 | % | | | 36.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| State income taxes, net of Federal tax effect | 3.2 |
| | 4.1 |
| | 5.2 |
|
| Non-deductible goodwill impairment | — |
| | 4.3 |
| | (3.4 | ) |
| Non-deductible compensation | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Non-deductible meals and entertainment | 1.1 |
| | 5.2 |
| | — |
|
| Other | (1.7 | ) | | 3.0 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
| Effective tax rate | 38.7 | % | | 51.6 | % | | 36.5 | % |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are composed of the
following: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Deferred taxes, current: | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable reserves | | $ | 779 | | | $ | 859 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 2,902 | | | | 3,795 | |
Deferred compensation obligation | | | 1,111 | | | | 917 | |
Pension and postretirement benefit plans | | | 19 | | | | 4,191 | |
Other | | | 75 | | | | 71 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets, current | | | 4,886 | | | | 9,833 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | | (224 | ) | | | (339 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax asset, net – current | | | 4,662 | | | | 9,494 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred taxes, non-current: | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 579 | | | | 258 | |
Deferred compensation obligation | | | 6,896 | | | | 6,622 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 773 | | | | 356 | |
Pension and postretirement benefit plans | | | 4,916 | | | | 5,563 | |
Goodwill and intangible assets | | | 11,750 | | | | 10,142 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 106 | | | | 54 | |
Other | | | 1,531 | | | | 2,140 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets, non-current | | | 26,551 | | | | 25,135 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets | | | (2,693 | ) | | | (2,659 | ) |
Other | | | (503 | ) | | | (868 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities, non-current | | | (3,196 | ) | | | (3,527 | ) |
| | |
Valuation allowance | | | (85 | ) | | | (85 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax asset, net – non-current | | | 23,270 | | | | 21,523 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 27,932 | | | $ | 31,017 | |
| | | | | | | | |
following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Deferred taxes, current: | | | |
| Assets: | | | |
| Accounts receivable reserves | $ | 804 |
| | $ | 779 |
|
| Accrued liabilities | 3,123 |
| | 2,902 |
|
| Deferred compensation obligation | 1,426 |
| | 1,111 |
|
| Pension and post-retirement benefit plans | — |
| | 19 |
|
| Other | 75 |
| | 75 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, current | 5,428 |
| | 4,886 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | |
| Prepaid expenses | (448 | ) | | (224 | ) |
| Deferred tax asset, net – current | 4,980 |
| | 4,662 |
|
| Deferred taxes, non-current: | | | |
| Assets: | | | |
| Accrued liabilities | 649 |
| | 579 |
|
| Deferred compensation obligation | 6,324 |
| | 6,896 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 1,185 |
| | 773 |
|
| Pension and post-retirement benefit plans | 5,125 |
| | 4,916 |
|
| Goodwill and intangible assets | 10,407 |
| | 11,750 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 28 |
| | 106 |
|
| Other | 995 |
| | 1,531 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, non-current | 24,713 |
| | 26,551 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | |
| Fixed assets | (1,651 | ) | | (2,693 | ) |
| Other | (122 | ) | | (503 | ) |
| Deferred tax liabilities, non-current | (1,773 | ) | | (3,196 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | (85 | ) | | (85 | ) |
| Deferred tax asset, net – non-current | 22,855 |
| | 23,270 |
|
| Net deferred tax asset | $ | 27,835 |
| | $ | 27,932 |
|
At December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce had approximately
$20,907$26.8 million of state tax net operating losses (“NOLs”) which will be carried forward to be offset against future state taxable income. The state tax NOLs expire in varying amounts through
2032.2033.
In evaluating the realizability of Kforce’s deferred tax assets, management assesses whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets, will be realized. Management considers, among other things, the ability to generate future taxable income (including reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which the related temporary differences will become deductible.
Kforce is periodically subject to
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS audits, as well as state and other local income tax audits for various tax years. During
2013,2014, the IRS finished an examination of Kforce’s U.S. income tax return for
20092010 and 2011 with no material
adjustments, and no settlements. During 2013, the IRS commenced a Limited Issue Focused Exam of Kforce’s 2010 and 2011 U.S. income tax returns. No material liabilities are expected to result from this ongoing examination.adjustments. Although Kforce has not experienced any material liabilities in the past due to income tax audits, Kforce can make no assurances that this will continue.
Uncertain Income Tax Positions
An uncertain income tax position taken on the income tax return must be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
20112012 is as
follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 191 | |
Additions for tax positions of prior years | | | 269 | | | | 36 | | | | 10 | |
Additions for tax positions of current year | | | 25 | | | | 25 | | | | 38 | |
Reductions for tax positions of prior years – lapse of applicable statutes | | | (24 | ) | | | — | | | | (82 | ) |
Settlements | | | — | | | | — | | | | (85 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 403 | | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 403 |
| | $ | 133 |
| | $ | 72 |
|
| Additions for tax positions of prior years | 90 |
| | 269 |
| | 36 |
|
| Additions for tax positions of current year | — |
| | 25 |
| | 25 |
|
| Reductions for tax positions of prior years – lapse of applicable statutes | (35 | ) | | (24 | ) | | — |
|
| Settlements | (180 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Ending balance | $ | 278 |
| | $ | 403 |
| | $ | 133 |
|
The entire amount of these unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,
2013,2014, if recognized, would not significantly impact the effective tax rate. Kforce does not expect any significant changes to its uncertain tax positions in the next 12 months.
Kforce and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. Global files income tax returns in the Philippines. With a few exceptions, Kforce is no longer subject to federal, state, local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before
2009.2010.
5. Other Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Assets held in Rabbi Trust | | $ | 24,910 | | | $ | 20,801 | |
Capitalized software, net of amortization | | | 5,472 | | | | 6,729 | |
Deferred loan costs, net of amortization | | | 288 | | | | 345 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 321 | | | | 163 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 30,991 | | | $ | 28,038 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Assets held in Rabbi Trust | $ | 25,715 |
| | $ | 24,910 |
|
| Capitalized software, net of amortization | 3,678 |
| | 5,472 |
|
| Deferred loan costs, net of amortization | 608 |
| | 288 |
|
| Other non-current assets | 348 |
| | 321 |
|
| | $ | 30,349 |
| | $ | 30,991 |
|
As of December 31, 2014, the assets held in Rabbi Trust were $25.7 million, which was related to the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. As of December 31, 2013, the assets held in Rabbi Trust were
$24,910,$24.9 million, which was comprised of
$24,041$24.0 million related to the cash surrender value of life insurance policies and
$869$0.9 million of money market
funds. As of December 31, 2012, the assets held in Rabbi Trust were $20,801, which was comprised of $16,677 related to the cash surrender value of life insurance policies and $4,124 of bond mutual funds. The cash surrender value of Company-owned life insurance policies relates to policies maintained by Kforce on certain participants in its deferred compensation plan, which, in conjunction with the money market funds, could be used to fund the related
obligations (Note 12).obligations.
Kforce capitalized software purchases, as well as direct costs associated with software developed for internal use of approximately
$2,244$1.2 million and
$2,429$2.2 million during the years ended December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software was
$34,816$37.6 million and
$31,861$34.8 million as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively. Amortization expense of capitalized software during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
was $2.9 million, $3.2 million and
2011 was $3,236, $4,587 and $5,716,$4.6 million, respectively.
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table contains a disclosure of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in total and for each reporting unit for the two years ended December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Technology | | | Finance and
Accounting | | | Clinical
Research | | | Health
Information
Management | | | Government
Solutions | | | Total | |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | $ | 17,034 | | | $ | 8,006 | | | $ | 5,474 | | | $ | 4,923 | | | $ | 102,641 | | | $ | 138,078 | |
Adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36 | | | | (36 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Disposition of KCR (a) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,510 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,510 | ) |
Impairment of goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (69,158 | ) | | | (69,158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | $ | 17,034 | | | $ | 8,006 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,887 | | | $ | 33,483 | | | $ | 63,410 | |
Impairment of goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (14,510 | ) | | | (14,510 | ) |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | 17,034 | | | $ | 8,006 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,887 | | | $ | 18,973 | | | $ | 48,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Technology | | Finance and
Accounting | | Health
Information
Management | | Government
Solutions | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 17,034 |
| | $ | 8,006 |
| | $ | 4,887 |
| | $ | 33,483 |
| | $ | 63,410 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,510 | ) | | (14,510 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 17,034 |
| | $ | 8,006 |
| | $ | 4,887 |
| | $ | 18,973 |
| | $ | 48,900 |
|
| Additions (a) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,955 |
| | 1,955 |
|
| Disposition of HIM (b) | — |
| | — |
| | (4,887 | ) | | — |
| | (4,887 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 17,034 |
| | $ | 8,006 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,928 |
| | $ | 45,968 |
|
| |
| (a) | The increase is due to the acquisition of a business within our GS reporting segment. |
| |
| (b) | The decrease is due to the disposition of our HIM reporting segment. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” for additional discussion. |
Kforce performed its annual impairment assessment of the carrying value of goodwill as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012.2013. During the impairment test performed
onas of December 31,
2012,2014, Kforce
performed a step 1 analysis for each reporting unit and compared the carrying value of
the GS reporting unit to its estimated fair value and for the Tech, FA and
HIMGS to the respective estimated fair values. Kforce concluded there were no indications of impairment for its reporting units
performed aduring the December 31, 2014 annual impairment tests. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, for our Tech and FA reporting units, we assessed qualitative
assessmentfactors to determine
ifwhether the existence of events or circumstances indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units was less than its carrying amount.
KforceWe concluded
therethat it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units were
no indications of impairmentmore than its carrying amount and therefore we were not required to perform any additional analysis. In 2013 and 2012, for
its Tech, FA, HIM orour GS reporting
units duringunit, we performed the
December 31, 2012 annualtwo-step analysis and compared the carrying value to its estimated fair value noting that the carrying value exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit which resulted in an impairment
tests.As of March 31, June 30,to goodwill in 2013 and September 30, 2013, as2012.
As part of our customary quarterly procedures, we considered the qualitative and quantitative factors associated with each of our reporting units and determined that there was not anno indication that the carrying values of any of our reporting units were likely impaired. During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce management made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services. impaired throughout 2014.
As
a result of this change in focus, management plans to reallocate existing investments in the business and redirect the business development team to concentrate on a more specific and, in our opinion, a higher quality revenue stream. These plans will ultimately result in the transition away from certain existing revenue streams, specific revenue-generating contracts and opportunities in the business development life cycle that do not fit within the revised strategic scope of service offerings, including pure staff augmentation as well as product sales. The change in strategy, coupled with the lengthy contract procurement cycle within the government sector of approximately 18 months for solution-based services, changed our expectations for the forecast, and is now is expected to have a negative impact on near-term growth prospects of the GS segment. We believe that these circumstances indicated a possible impairment trigger during the fourth quarter, which was assessed in conjunction with the annual impairment test.During the annual impairment test performed as of December 31, 20132014, for our Tech, FA and HIM reporting units, Kforce assessed the qualitative factors of each reporting unit to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. Based upon the qualitative assessments for our Tech and FA reporting units, it was determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units were less than the carrying values. For our HIM reporting unit, a quantitative, or step one, analysis was deemed appropriate as a result of the deterioration in the operating results as compared to previous forecasts.
For our GS and HIM reporting units, we compared the respective carrying values to their estimated fair value based on a weighting of both the income approach and the market approaches. Discounted cash flows, which serve as the primary basis for the income approach, were based on discrete financial forecasts which were developed by management for planning purposes and were consistent with those distributed within Kforce. Cash flows beyond the discrete forecast period of five years were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which incorporated historical and forecasted financial trends and also considered long-term earnings growth rates for publicly-traded peer companies, as well as the risk-free rate of return. For the GS reporting unit, the discrete financial forecast includes certain adjustments of costs that Kforce believes a market participant buyer, such as a large government contractor, would incur to operate the GS reporting unit. A terminal value growth rate of 3% was used for both the GS and the HIM reporting units. The income approach valuation included the cash flow discount rate, representing the GS and HIM reporting units’ weighted average cost of capital of 17% and 17.5%, respectively. This weighted average cost of capital includes a specific company risk premium of 2% for both GS and HIM.
As previously mentioned, the market approaches consist ofof: (1) the (i) guideline company method and (ii)(2) the guideline transaction method. The guideline company method applies pricing multiples derived from publicly-traded guideline companies that are comparable to the respective reporting unit to determine its value. To calculate fair values under the guideline company method, Kforce utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.4x to 0.5x and 0.3x to 0.6x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 4.4x to 6.9x and 5.4x to 13.5x for GS and HIM, respectively. Additionally, the fair value under the guideline company method included a control premium ranging of 40% and 10% for GS and HIM respectively, which was determined based on a review of comparative market transactions.
The guideline transaction method applies pricing multiples derived from recently completed acquisitions that we believe are reasonably comparable to the reporting unit to determine fair value. To calculate
Upon completion of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2014 for our Tech, FA and GS reporting units, it was determined that the fair values under the guideline transaction method, Kforce utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.6x to 2.0x and 0.2x to 0.8x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 5.8x and 18.7x and from 4.7x to 19.7x, respectivelyvalue exceeded its carrying value. As a result, no impairment charges were recognized for the Tech, FA and GS reporting units during the year ended December 31, 2014.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce management made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment to focus its service offerings and
HIM reporting units. Kforce used the enterprise value to EBITDA ratio due to it being the predominant measure used in the marketplace to value this type of business. Publicly available information regarding the market capitalization of Kforce was also considered in assessing the reasonableness of the cumulative fair values of our reporting units.efforts on prime integrated business solution services. Upon completion of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2013 for our HIMGS reporting unit, it was determined the fair value exceeded its carrying value by 156%. For the GS reporting unit, the resultsthat there was an indication of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2013 indicated that the fair value was 73% of its carrying value; therefore, impairment was indicated.impairment. Because indicators of impairment existed, we commenced the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis to determine the implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit, which was determined in the same manner utilized to estimate the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. As part of the second step of the impairment analysis performed as of December 31, 2013, we calculated the fair value of certain assets, including trade names and customer relationships. The implied fair value of goodwill was measured as the excess of the fair value of the GS reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities.analysis. The goodwill impairment loss for the reporting unit was measured by the amount the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill. Based on this assessment, we recorded an impairment charge of $14,510$14.5 million which is presented separately in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss). A tax benefit in the amount of $5,160$5.2 million was recorded related to the goodwill impairment charge.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, due to certain adverse effects of events and indications during that time period, Kforce believed that a triggering event occurred within our GS reporting unit during the quarter. As a result, Kforce performed an interim goodwill impairment analysis for its GS reporting unit as of June 30, 2012, which resulted in an indication of impairment and Kforce recording an estimated impairment charge. Due to the complexity of the second step of the impairment analysis, Kforce completed the analysis during the fourth quarter of 2012. Based on this assessment, we recorded an impairment charge of
$69,158$69.2 million which included a related tax benefit of
$24,670$24.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. This impairment charge included an incremental adjustment of
$3,858$3.9 million with a related tax benefit of
$1,405$1.4 million resulting from the completion of the second step analysis during the fourth quarter of 2012.
Total goodwill impairment for the years ending December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
was nil, $14.5 million and
2011 was $14,510, $69,158 and $0,$69.2 million, respectively.
The following table contains a disclosure of the gross amount and accumulated impairment losses of goodwill for Tech, FA and GS reporting units for the twothree years ended December 31, 2013:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Goodwill Carrying Value by Reporting Unit as of: | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | January 1, 2012 | |
Technology | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross amount | | $ | 156,391 | | | $ | 156,391 | | | $ | 156,391 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | $ | (139,357 | ) | | $ | (139,357 | ) | | $ | (139,357 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | $ | 17,034 | | | $ | 17,034 | | | $ | 17,034 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Finance and Accounting | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross amount | | $ | 19,766 | | | $ | 19,766 | | | $ | 19,766 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | $ | (11,760 | ) | | $ | (11,760 | ) | | $ | (11,760 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | $ | 8,006 | | | $ | 8,006 | | | $ | 8,006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Solutions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross amount | | $ | 102,641 | | | $ | 102,641 | | | $ | 102,641 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | $ | (83,668 | ) | | $ | (69,158 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | $ | 18,973 | | | $ | 33,483 | | | $ | 102,641 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
There has been no impairment charges recognized for the HIM reporting unit. As a result, the carrying value2014 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Goodwill Carrying Value by Reporting Unit as of: |
| | December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| Technology | | | | | |
| Gross amount | $ | 156,391 |
| | $ | 156,391 |
| | $ | 156,391 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | (139,357 | ) | | (139,357 | ) | | (139,357 | ) |
| Carrying value | $ | 17,034 |
| | $ | 17,034 |
| | $ | 17,034 |
|
| Finance and Accounting | | | | | |
| Gross amount | $ | 19,766 |
| | $ | 19,766 |
| | $ | 19,766 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | (11,760 | ) | | (11,760 | ) | | (11,760 | ) |
| Carrying value | $ | 8,006 |
| | $ | 8,006 |
| | $ | 8,006 |
|
| Government Solutions | | | | | |
| Gross amount | $ | 104,596 |
| | $ | 102,641 |
| | $ | 102,641 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | (83,668 | ) | | (83,668 | ) | | (69,158 | ) |
| Carrying value | $ | 20,928 |
| | $ | 18,973 |
| | $ | 33,483 |
|
The gross and net carrying values of intangible assets as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, by major intangible asset class, are as
follows: | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
Definite-lived intangible assets | | | | | | | | |
Customer relationships, customer contracts, and other | | | | | | | | |
Gross amount | | $ | 27,940 | | | $ | 27,936 | |
Accumulated amortization | | $ | (25,187 | ) | | $ | (24,440 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | $ | 2,753 | | | $ | 3,496 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | | | | | | | | |
Trade name and trademark | | | | | | | | |
Gross amount | | $ | 2,240 | | | $ | 2,240 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Carrying value | | $ | 2,240 | | | $ | 2,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| Definite-lived intangible assets | | | |
| Customer relationships, customer contracts, technology and other | | | |
| Gross amount | $ | 28,603 |
| | $ | 27,940 |
|
| Accumulated amortization | (25,832 | ) | | (25,187 | ) |
| Carrying value | $ | 2,771 |
| | $ | 2,753 |
|
| Indefinite-lived intangible assets | | | |
| Trade name and trademark | | | |
| Gross amount | $ | 2,240 |
| | $ | 2,240 |
|
| Accumulated impairment losses | — |
| | — |
|
| Carrying value | $ | 2,240 |
| | $ | 2,240 |
|
Amortization expense on intangible assets for each of the three years ended December 31,
2014, 2013,
and 2012
was $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
2011 was $747, $907 and $1,152,$0.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017,
2018, 2019 and
2018thereafter is expected to be
$634, $634, $457, $209approximately $0.8 million, $0.6 million, $0.3 million, $0.3 million, $0.3 million and
$209,$0.4 million, respectively.
There was no impairment expense related to indefinite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 or
2011.2012.
7. Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consisted of the
following: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 19,445 | | | $ | 22,653 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 12,376 | | | | 13,552 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 31,821 | | | $ | 36,205 | |
| | | | | | | | |
following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Accounts payable | $ | 21,863 |
| | $ | 19,445 |
|
| Accrued liabilities | 16,241 |
| | 12,376 |
|
| | $ | 38,104 |
| | $ | 31,821 |
|
Kforce utilizes a major procurement card provider to pay certain of its corporate trade payables. The balance owed to this provider for these transactions as of December 31,
2014 and 2013
was $535 thousand and
2012 was $695
and $875,thousand, respectively, and has been included in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash flows associated with these transactions have been presented as a financing activity in the accompanying
consolidated statementConsolidated Statement of
cash flows.Cash Flows.
Accrued payroll costs consisted of the
following: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Payroll and benefits | | $ | 43,059 | | | $ | 36,172 | |
Payroll taxes | | | 9,111 | | | | 9,246 | |
Health insurance liabilities | | | 2,993 | | | | 3,114 | |
Workers’ compensation liabilities | | | 1,709 | | | | 1,531 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 56,872 | | | $ | 50,063 | |
| | | | | | | | |
9. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consistedfollowing (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Payroll and benefits | $ | 43,797 |
| | $ | 43,059 |
|
| Payroll taxes | 3,062 |
| | 9,111 |
|
| Health insurance liabilities | 3,417 |
| | 2,993 |
|
| Workers’ compensation liabilities | 1,932 |
| | 1,709 |
|
| | $ | 52,208 |
| | $ | 56,872 |
|
On September 20, 2011, Kforce entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with a syndicate led by Bank of America, N.A. This was amended on March 30, 2012
in connection withthrough the
divestitureexecution of
KCRa Consent and
was amendedFirst Amendment, on December 27, 2013
(as amended to date, the “Credit Facility”) through the execution of a Second Amendment and Joinder,
and further amended on December 23, 2014 through the execution of a Third Amendment resulting in
the increase in thea maximum borrowing capacity
from $100of $170.0 million,
to $135 million by executing the accordion feature under the Credit Facility. Kforce has a remainingas well as an accordion option of
$15$50.0 million. The maximum borrowings available to Kforce under the Credit Facility are limited to: (a) a revolving
credit facilityCredit Facility of up to
$135$170.0 million (the “Revolving Loan Amount”) and (b) a
$15$15.0 million sub-limit included in the Credit Facility for letters of credit.
Borrowing availability
Available borrowings under the Credit Facility isare limited to the remainder of (a) the lesser of (i) $135 million minus the four week average aggregate weekly payroll of employees assigned to work for customers, or (ii) 85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable, plus 80%85% of the net amount of eligible unbilled accounts receivable, plus 80% of the net amount of eligible employee placement accounts, minus certain minimum availability reserves,reserve; provided, that the Firm may, subject to certain conditions, elect to increase the available borrowing limitation based on a percentage of the appraised fair market value of the Firm's corporate headquarters property and/or an additional percentage of net eligible accounts receivable, net eligible unbilled accounts receivable and in either case, minus (b) the aggregate outstanding amountnet eligible employee placement accounts. Borrowings under the Credit Facility.Facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Firm, excluding the real estate located at the Firm's corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, unless the eligible real estate conditions are met. Outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Amount bear interest at a rate ofof: (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on various factors or (b) the higher of: (i)of (1) the prime rate, (ii)(2) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (iii)(3) LIBOR plus 1.25%. Fluctuations in the ratio of unbilled to billed receivables could result in material changes to availability from time to time. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility require Kforce to pay a fronting fee equal to 0.125% of the amount of each letter of credit issued, plus a per annum fee equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans based on the total letters of credit outstanding. To the extent that Kforce has unused availability under the Credit Facility, an unused line fee is required to be paid on a monthly basis equal toto: (a) if the applicable marginaverage daily aggregate revolver outstanding are less than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.35% or (b) if the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding are greater than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.25% times the amount by which the maximum revolver amount exceeded the sum of the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding, amount of the revolving loans and the average daily undrawn face amount of outstanding letters of credit during the immediateimmediately preceding month. Borrowings undermonth or shorter period if calculated for the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all offirst month hereafter or on the assets of Kforce and its subsidiaries, excluding the real estate located at Kforce’s corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida. termination date.
Under the Credit Facility, Kforce is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants including (but not limited to) the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 if the Firm’s availability under the Credit Facility is less than the greater of 10% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all of the lenders under the Credit Facility and $11 million.
Our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities could be limited if the Firm's availability is less than the greater of 12.5% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all lenders under the Credit Facility and $20.6 million. Kforce had availability under the Credit Facility of
$43.2$39.6 million as of December 31,
2013;2014; therefore, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was not
applicable.applicable and our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities was not restricted. Kforce believes that it will be able to maintain
thethese minimum availability
requirement;requirements; however, in the event that Kforce is unable to do so, Kforce could fail the fixed charge coverage ratio, which would constitute an event of
default.default, or could limit our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities. Kforce believes the likelihood of default is remote. The Credit Facility expires
September 20, 2016.December 23, 2019.
As of December 31,
2014 and 2013,
$93.3 million and
2012, $64,642 and $21,000$62.6 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, respectively.
11. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, maximum outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were $93.3 million. As of February 24, 2015, $97.0 million was outstanding and $39.7 million was available under the Credit Facility.
10. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the
following: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Deferred compensation plan (Note 12) | | $ | 22,247 | | | $ | 19,115 | |
Supplemental executive retirement plan (Note 12) | | | 7,852 | | | | 8,976 | |
Supplemental executive retirement health plan (Note 12) | | | 2,627 | | | | 3,554 | |
Other | | | 3,830 | | | | 2,640 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 36,556 | | | $ | 34,285 | |
| | | | | | | | |
12.following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Deferred compensation plan (Note 11) | $ | 22,425 |
| | $ | 22,247 |
|
| Supplemental executive retirement plan (Note 11) | 10,197 |
| | 7,852 |
|
| Supplemental executive retirement health plan (Note 11) | — |
| | 2,627 |
|
| Other | 3,834 |
| | 3,830 |
|
| | $ | 36,456 |
| | $ | 36,556 |
|
11. Employee Benefit Plans
Alternative Long-Term Incentive
On January 3, 2012, Kforce granted to certain executive officers an ALTI as the result of certain performance criteria established in 2011 being met, which was to be initially measured over three tranches having periods of 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The terms of the grants specified that the ultimate annual payouts would be based on: (a) Kforce’s common stock price changes each year relative to its peer group or (b) the achievement of other market conditions contained in the terms of the award.
As discussed within Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations,” the Board approved the acceleration of all outstanding and unvested long-term incentives, including the ALTI, effective March 31, 2012. The accelerated ALTI of
$9,805$9.8 million was paid in April 2012. Kforce recognized total compensation expense related to
the ALTI
$9,805of $9.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. No compensation expense related to
ALTIsthe ALTI was recorded during the years ended December 31,
20132014 or
2011.2013.
Kforce has a qualified defined contribution 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “Kforce 401(k) Plan”) covering substantially all Kforce
Inc. employees. Assets of the Kforce 401(k) Plan are held in trust for the sole benefit of employees and/or their beneficiaries. On October 2, 2006, Kforce created the Kforce Government Practice Plan, a qualified defined contribution 401(k) retirement savings plan (the “Government 401(k) Plan”), which covers all eligible employees of
the GS segment.KGS. Assets of the Government 401(k) Plan are held in trust for the sole benefit of employees and/or their beneficiaries. Employer matching contributions are discretionary and are funded annually as approved by the Board of Directors.
Kforce accrued matching contributions of
$973$1.3 million and
$1,139$1.0 million for the above plans as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively. The Kforce 401(k) Plan and Government 401(k) Plan held a combined
229 thousand and 317
and 363thousand shares of Kforce’s common stock as of December 31,
2014 and 2013,
and 2012, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Kforce’s employee stock purchase plan allows all eligible employees to purchase Kforce’s common stock at a 5% discount from its market price at the end of a rolling three-month offering period. Kforce issued
35 thousand, 41
thousand and 51
and 56thousand shares of common stock at an average purchase price of
$19.76, $14.88
$12.55 and
$12.64$12.55 per share during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, respectively. All shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan were settled using Kforce’s treasury stock.
Deferred Compensation Plan
Kforce has a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Kforce NQDC Plan”) and a Kforce Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Government Practice Plan (the
“GS“Government NQDC Plan”), pursuant to which eligible management and highly compensated key employees, as defined by IRS regulations, may elect to defer all or part of their compensation to later years. These amounts are classified in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities if payable within the next year or as other long-term liabilities if payable after the next year, upon retirement or termination of employment. At December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, amounts included in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities related to the deferred compensation plan totaled
$3,149$3.7 million and
$1,699,$3.1 million, respectively. Amounts included in other long-term liabilities related to the deferred compensation plan totaled
$22,247$22.4 million and
$19,115$22.2 million as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively. Kforce has insured the lives of certain participants in the deferred compensation plan to assist in the funding of the deferred compensation liability. Compensation
income from continuing operations of $187 thousand was recognized for the plans for the year ended December 31, 2014. Compensation expense
from continuing operations of
$578, $648$566 thousand and
$1,358$635 thousand was recognized for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2013
and 2012,
and 2011, respectively.
Employee distributions are being funded through proceeds from the sale of assets held within our Rabbi Trust. The fair value of the assets within the Rabbi Trust, including the cash surrender value of the Company-owned life insurance policies
and money market funds,
was $25.7 million and
bond mutual funds, was $24,910 and $20,801$24.9 million as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, respectively, and is recorded in Other assets, net in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet.Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013 and 2012, there was
nil, $15
thousand in losses and $519
thousand in gains, respectively, attributable to the investments in trading securities, including both money market funds and bond mutual funds, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of
operationsOperations and
comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss).
The Firm held no trading securities, and as such, recorded no gains or losses during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Kforce maintains a foreign defined benefit pension plan for eligible employees of the Philippine branch of Global that is required by Philippine labor laws. The plan defines retirement as those employees who have attained the age of 60 and have completed at least five years of credited service. Benefits payable under the plan equate to one-half month’s salary for each year of credited service. Benefits under the plan are paid out as a lump sum to eligible employees at retirement.
The significant assumptions used by Kforce in the actuarial valuation include the discount rate, the estimated rate of future annual compensation increases and the estimated turnover rate. As of December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, the discount rate used to determine the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation and pension expense was
5.0%4.7%,
6.0%5.0% and
7.40%6.0%, respectively. The discount rate was determined based on long-term Philippine government securities yields commensurate with the expected payout of the benefit obligation. The estimated rate of future annual compensation increases as of December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
20112012 was 3.0%,
3.0% and 5.0%, respectively, and was based on historical compensation increases, as well as future expectations. The Company applies a turnover rate to the specific age of each group of employees, which ranges from 20 to 64 years of age. For the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 and
2011,2012, net periodic benefit cost was
$124 thousand, $92
thousand and $128
and $189,thousand, respectively.
As of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, the projected benefit obligation associated with our foreign defined benefit pension plan was
$1,434$1.6 million and
$1,187,$1.4 million, respectively, which is classified in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Kforce maintains a
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”)SERP for the benefit of certain
Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”).executive officers. The primary goals of the SERP are to create an additional wealth accumulation opportunity, restore lost qualified pension benefits due to government limitations and retain our
NEOs.covered executive officers. The SERP is a non-qualified benefit plan and does not include elective deferrals of covered executive officers’ compensation.
Normal retirement age under the SERP is defined as age 65; however, certain conditions allow for early retirement as early as age 55 or upon a change in control. Vesting under the plan is defined as 100% upon a participant’s attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service and 0% prior to a participant’s attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service. Full vesting also occurs if a participant with five years or more of service is involuntarily terminated by Kforce without cause or upon death, disability or a change in control. The SERP is funded entirely by Kforce, and benefits are taxable to the
covered executive officer upon receipt and deductible by Kforce when paid. Benefits payable under the SERP upon the occurrence of a qualifying distribution event, as defined, are targeted at 45% of the covered executive officers’ average salary and bonus, as defined, from the three years in which the
covered executive officer earned the highest salary and bonus during the last 10 years of employment, which is subject to adjustment for retirement prior to the normal retirement age and the participant’s vesting percentage. The benefits under the SERP are reduced for a participant that has not reached age 62 with 10 years of service or age 55 with 25 years of service with a percentage reduction up to the normal retirement age.
Benefits under the SERP are normally paid based on the lump sum present value but may be paid over the life of the covered executive officer or 10-year annuity, as elected by the covered executive officer upon commencement of participation in the SERP. None of the benefits earned pursuant to the SERP are attributable to services provided prior to the effective date of the plan. For purposes of the measurement of the benefit obligation as of December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce has assumed that all participants will elect to take the lump sum present value option based on historical trends.
The following represents the actuarial assumptions used to determine the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations at: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Discount rate | | | 3.75 | % | | | 2.50 | % |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | | — | | | | — | |
Rate of future compensation increase | | | 4.00 | % | | | 3.75 | % |
|
| | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Discount rate | 3.75 | % | | 3.75 | % |
| Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | — | % | | — | % |
| Rate of future compensation increase | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % |
The following represents the weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Discount rate | | | 2.50 | % | | | 3.25 | % | | | 4.00 | % |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Rate of future compensation increase | | | 4.00 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 4.00 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Discount rate | 3.75 | % | | 2.50 | % | | 3.25 | % |
| Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Rate of future compensation increase | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % |
The discount rate was determined using the Moody’s Aa long-term corporate bond yield as of the measurement date with a maturity commensurate with the expected payout of the SERP obligation. This rate is also compared against the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve and Liability Index to ensure the rate used is reasonable and may be adjusted accordingly. This index is widely used by companies throughout the United States and is considered to be one of the preferred standards for establishing a discount rate.
Due to the SERP being unfunded as of December 31,
20132014 and
2012,2013, it is not necessary for Kforce to determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Once funded, Kforce will determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by determining the composition of the asset portfolio, the historical long-term investment performance and the current market conditions. The assumed rate of future compensation increases is based on a combination of factors, including the historical compensation increases for its
NEOscovered executive officers and future target compensation levels for its
NEOscovered executive officers taking into account the
NEOs’covered executive officers' assumed retirement date.
The periodic benefit cost is based on actuarial assumptions that are reviewed on an annual basis; however, Kforce monitors these assumptions on a periodic basis to ensure that they accurately reflect current expectations of the cost of providing retirement benefits.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The following represents the components of net periodic benefit cost for the years
ended: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Service cost | | $ | 2,018 | | | $ | 2,087 | | | $ | 3,248 | |
Interest cost | | | 471 | | | | 560 | | | | 482 | |
Amortization of actuarial loss | | | 97 | | | | 164 | | | | 76 | |
Settlement loss | | | 24 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 2,610 | | | $ | 2,811 | | | $ | 3,806 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ended (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Service cost | $ | 1,164 |
| | $ | 2,018 |
| | $ | 2,087 |
|
| Interest cost | 294 |
| | 471 |
| | 560 |
|
| Amortization of actuarial loss | — |
| | 97 |
| | 164 |
|
| Settlement loss | — |
| | 24 |
| | — |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,458 |
| | $ | 2,610 |
| | $ | 2,811 |
|
Changes in Benefit Obligation
The following represents the changes in the benefit obligation for the years
ended: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Projected benefit obligation, beginning | | $ | 19,658 | | | $ | 17,230 | |
Service cost | | | 2,018 | | | | 2,087 | |
Interest cost | | | 471 | | | | 560 | |
Actuarial experience and changes in actuarial assumptions | | | (1,475 | ) | | | (219 | ) |
Curtailment | | | (2,138 | ) | | | — | |
Benefits Paid | | | (10,682 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Projected benefit obligation, ending | | $ | 7,852 | | | $ | 19,658 | |
| | | | | | | | |
ended (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Projected benefit obligation, beginning | $ | 7,852 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
|
| Service cost | 1,164 |
| | 2,018 |
|
| Interest cost | 294 |
| | 471 |
|
| Actuarial experience and changes in actuarial assumptions | 887 |
| | (1,475 | ) |
| Curtailment | — |
| | (2,138 | ) |
| Benefits Paid | — |
| | (10,682 | ) |
| Projected benefit obligation, ending | $ | 10,197 |
| | $ | 7,852 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no payments made under the SERP. During the three months ended December 31, 2013, in connection with the Firm’s organizational realignment, two participants in the SERP were terminated, resulting in a curtailment of
$2,138$2.1 million to the projected benefit obligation. Additionally, during the three months ended December 31, 2013, Kforce made a lump sum payment to a participant in the SERP of
$10,682$10.7 million as a result of the participant’s separation from service on June 1,
2013, as previously announced.2013. The
current portion of the present value of the projected benefit obligation (as recorded in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) was $0 and $10,682 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The long-term portion of the present value of the projected benefit obligation as of December 31,
2014 and 2013
was $10.2 million and
2012 was $7,852 and $8,976,$7.9 million, respectively, and is recorded in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no payments made under the SERP.Consolidated Balance Sheets.
There is no requirement for Kforce to fund the SERP and, as a result, no contributions have been made to the SERP through the year ended December 31,
2013.2014. Kforce does not currently anticipate funding the SERP during the year ending December 31,
2014.2015.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Benefit
Undiscounted benefit payments by the SERP, which reflect the anticipated future service of participants,
are expected to be paid
(undiscounted)are as
follows: | | | | |
| | PROJECTED ANNUAL
BENEFIT PAYMENTS | |
2014
| | $ | — | |
2015
| | | — | |
2016
| | | — | |
2017
| | | — | |
2018
| | | — | |
2019-2023
| | | 7,494 | |
Thereafter
| | | 3,044 | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | PROJECTED ANNUAL
BENEFIT PAYMENTS |
| 2015 | $ | — |
|
| 2016 | — |
|
| 2017 | — |
|
| 2018 | — |
|
| 2019 | 9,187 |
|
| 2020-2024 | — |
|
| Thereafter | 4,081 |
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Health Plan
Kforce
maintainsmaintained a Supplemental Executive Retirement Health Plan (“SERHP”) to provide
postretirementpost-retirement health and welfare benefits to certain executives. The vesting and eligibility requirements
mirrormirrored that of the SERP, and no advance funding
iswas required by Kforce or the participants. Consistent with the SERP, none of the benefits earned
arewere attributable to services provided prior to the effective date of the plan.
Actuarial Assumptions
The following represents
During the
actuarial assumptions used to determine the present value of the postretirement benefit obligation at: | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Discount rate | | | 5.00 | % | | | 3.75 | % |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | | — | | | | — | |
The following represents the actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Discount rate | | | 3.75 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 5.25 | % |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
The discount rate was determined using the Moody’s Aa long-term corporate bond yield as of the measurement date with a maturity commensurate with the expected payout of the SERP obligation. This rate is compared against the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve and Liability Index to ensure the rate used is reasonable.
Due to the SERHP being unfunded as ofyear ended December 31, 20132014, Kforce terminated the Company's SERHP and 2012, it is not necessary for Kforce to determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Once funded, Kforce will determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by determining the composition of the asset portfolio, the historical long-term investment performance and current market conditions.
The following represents the assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the postretirementsettled all future benefit obligations for the years ended:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year | | | 7.5 | % | | | 7.50 | % |
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline to (ultimate trend rate) | | | 5.00 | % | | | 5.00 | % |
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate | | | 2018 | | | | 2017 | |
Assumed health care cost trend rates can haveby making lump sum payments totaling approximately $3.9 million, which resulted in a significant effect on the amounts reported for the SERHP. A one percent changenet settlement loss of $725 thousand recorded in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | One Percentage Point | |
| | | Increase | | | Decrease | |
Effect of total of service and interest cost | | $ | 73 | | | $ | (59 | ) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation | | $ | 459 | | | $ | (374 | ) |
Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
The following represents the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Service cost | | $ | 649 | | | $ | 919 | | | $ | 324 | |
Interest cost | | | 134 | | | | 150 | | | | 47 | |
Amortization of actuarial loss | | | 86 | | | | 272 | | | | 6 | |
Curtailment gain | | | (359 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit (gain) cost | | $ | 510 | | | $ | 1,341 | | | $ | 377 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in Postretirement Benefit Obligation
The following represents the changesselling, general and administrative expenses in the postretirementcorresponding Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The termination effectively removed Kforce's related post-retirement benefit obligation for the years ended:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | DECEMBER 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, beginning | | $ | 3,574 | | | $ | 3,764 | |
Service cost | | | 649 | | | | 919 | |
Interest cost | | | 134 | | | | 150 | |
Actuarial experience and changes in actuarial assumptions | | | (834 | ) | | | (1,259 | ) |
Curtailment | | | (785 | ) | | | — | |
Benefits Paid | | | (64 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, ending | | $ | 2,674 | | | $ | 3,574 | |
| | | | | | | | |
obligation.
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, in connection with the Firm’s organizational realignment, two participants in the SERHP were terminated, resulting in a curtailment of $785 thousand to the projected benefit obligation and in the recognition of a curtailment gain of $359 thousand recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the corresponding consolidated statementConsolidated Statement of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss). The current portion of the accumulated postretirementpost-retirement benefit obligation as recorded in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets was $47 and $20thousand as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.2013. The long-term portion of the accumulated postretirementpost-retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $2,627 and $3,554, respectively,was $2.6 million and is recorded in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. DuringConsolidated Balance Sheets.
Net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost
The following represents the
year ended December 31, 2012, there were no payments made under the SERHP.Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Benefit payments by the SERHP, which reflect anticipated future service of the participants, are expected to be paid (undiscounted) as follows:
| | | | |
| | | PROJECTED ANNUAL
BENEFIT PAYMENTS | |
2014 | | $ | 48 | |
2015 | | | 52 | |
2016 | | | 57 | |
2017 | | | 70 | |
2018 | | | 76 | |
2019-2023 | | | 743 | |
Thereafter | | | 7,491 | |
Pretax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2013 that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic post-retirement benefit cost for all of Kforce’s defined benefit pension and postretirement plans, including the foreign defined benefit plan, consist entirely of actuarial gains and losses arising fromyears ended (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Service cost | $ | 174 |
| | $ | 649 |
| | $ | 919 |
|
| Interest cost | 78 |
| | 134 |
| | 150 |
|
| Amortization of actuarial loss | — |
| | 86 |
| | 272 |
|
| Settlement/curtailment loss/(gain) | 725 |
| | (359 | ) | | — |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 977 |
| | $ | 510 |
| | $ | 1,341 |
|
Changes in Post-retirement Benefit Obligation
The following represents the
actuarial experience of the plans and changes in
actuarial assumptions, as follows: | | | | | | | | |
| | | Pensions | | | Postretirement | |
Net pretax actuarial gain | | $ | 304 | | | $ | 234 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The estimated portion of the net actuarial loss above that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodicpost-retirement benefit cost inobligation for the year ending December 31, 2014 is shown below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Pensions | | | Postretirement | |
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) | | $ | 11 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
13.years ended (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, beginning | $ | 2,674 |
| | $ | 3,574 |
|
| Service cost | 174 |
| | 649 |
|
| Interest cost | 78 |
| | 134 |
|
| Actuarial experience and changes in actuarial assumptions | 234 |
| | (834 | ) |
| Settlement/curtailment loss/(gain) | 725 |
| | (785 | ) |
| Benefits Paid | (3,885 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, ending | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,674 |
|
12. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It establishes a fair value hierarchy and a framework which requires categorizing assets and liabilities into one of three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used in valuing the asset or liability. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted, quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets. Level 3 inputs include unobservable inputs that are supported by little, infrequent, or no market activity and reflect management’s own assumptions about inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. The Company uses the following valuation techniques to measure fair value.
The underlying investments within Kforce’s deferred compensation
plansplan have included money market
funds and bond mutual funds, which are held within the Rabbi Trust.
The assets previously in bond mutual funds as of December 31, 2012 are now held in money market funds as of December 31, 2013. Assets held within the money market
funds and bond mutual funds are measured on a recurring basis and are recorded at fair value based on each fund’s quoted market value per share in an active market, which is considered a Level 1 input.
Certain assets, in specific circumstances, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis utilizing Level 3 inputs such as goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition would be applicable if one or more of these assets were determined to be impaired.
There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 assets during the years ended December 31,
20132014 and
2012.2013. Transfers between levels are deemed to have occurred if the lowest level of input were to change.
Kforce’s measurements at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of December 31,
20132014 and
20122013 were as
follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets/(Liabilities) Measured at Fair Value: | | Asset/(Liability) | | | Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3) | |
As of December 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds (1) | | $ | 869 | | | $ | 869 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Credit Facility (2) | | $ | (62,642 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (62,642 | ) | | $ | — | |
Non-recurring basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill (3) | | $ | 48,900 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 48,900 | |
| | | | |
As of December 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bond mutual funds (1) | | $ | 4,124 | | | $ | 4,124 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Credit Facility (2) | | $ | (21,000 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (21,000 | ) | | $ | — | |
Non-recurring basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill (3) | | $ | 63,410 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 63,410 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Assets/(Liabilities) Measured at Fair Value: | Asset/(Liability) | | Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) | | Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3) |
| As of December 31, 2014 | | | | | | | |
| Recurring basis: | | | | | | | |
| Money market funds (1) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Contingent liability (2) | $ | (477 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (477 | ) |
| As of December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | |
| Recurring basis: | | | | | | | |
| Money market funds (1) | $ | 869 |
| | $ | 869 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Non-recurring basis: | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill (3) | $ | 48,900 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 48,900 |
|
| |
| (1) | See Note 1211 – “Employee Benefit Plans” and Note 5 – “Other Assets” for additional discussion. |
| |
| (2) | The carrying valuecontingent liability relates to the acquisition of long-term debt approximates its estimated fair value as it re-prices at varying interest rates.a business within our GS reporting segment. |
| |
| (3) | This amount is representative of the aggregated goodwill balance. The portion measured at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 of $18,973 and $38,483, respectively,$19.0 million was related to the GS segment. The remaining portion of the goodwill balance presented is at carrying value. See Note 6 – “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional discussion. |
14.
13. Stock Incentive Plans
On April 5, 2013, the shareholders approved the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, which was previously adopted by the Board
of Directors on March 1, 2013, subject to shareholder approval. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that are subject to awards under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to adjustment upon a change in capitalization, is
4,000.4.0 million. On June 20, 2006, the shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and, as amended, the aggregate number of shares of common stock that are subject to awards is
7,850.7.9 million.
The 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 Stock Incentive Plan allow for the issuance of stock options,
SARs, restricted stock
appreciation rights (“SARs”) and
restrictedcommon stock, subject to share availability. Vesting of equity instruments is determined on a grant-by-grant basis. Options expire at the end of 10 years from the date of grant, and Kforce issues new shares upon exercise of options.
The 2013 Stock Incentive Plan terminates on April 5, 2023 and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan terminates on April 28, 2016. The Incentive Stock Option Plan expired in 2005.
Total
stock-based compensation expense recognized related to all equity awards during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
was $5.5 million, $2.6 million and
2011 was $2,570, $26,243$26.2 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and
$11,976,2012, Kforce recognized stock-based compensation expense from continuing operations of $3.0 million, $2.6 million and $26.2 million, respectively. The related tax benefit for the three years ended December 31,
20132014 was
$1,018, $10,241$1.2 million, $1.0 million and
$4,696,$10.2 million, respectively.
The following table presents the activity under each of the stock incentive plans discussed above for the three years ended December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Incentive
Stock
Option
Plan | | | Stock
Incentive
Plan | | | Total | | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share | | | Total
Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercised | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010 | | | 587 | | | | 98 | | | | 685 | | | $ | 9.47 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (349 | ) | | | — | | | | (349 | ) | | $ | 8.20 | | | $ | 2,931 | |
Forfeited/Cancelled | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | $ | 10.75 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | | | 226 | | | | 98 | | | | 324 | | | $ | 10.79 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (65 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | (70 | ) | | $ | 10.48 | | | $ | 238 | |
Forfeited/Cancelled | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | $ | 11.00 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | | | 154 | | | | 93 | | | | 247 | | | $ | 10.87 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (57 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | (67 | ) | | $ | 8.98 | | | $ | 573 | |
Forfeited/Cancelled | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding and Exercisable as of December 31, 2013 | | | 97 | | | | 83 | | | | 180 | | | $ | 11.57 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Incentive
Stock
Option
Plan | | 2006 Stock
Incentive
Plan | | Total | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share | | Total
Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercised |
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | 226 |
| | 98 |
| | 324 |
| | $ | 10.79 |
| | |
| Exercised | (65 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (70 | ) | | $ | 10.48 |
| | $ | 238 |
|
| Forfeited/Cancelled | (7 | ) | | — |
| | (7 | ) | | $ | 11.00 |
| | |
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | 154 |
| | 93 |
| | 247 |
| | $ | 10.87 |
| | |
| Exercised | (57 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (67 | ) | | $ | 8.98 |
| | $ | 573 |
|
| Forfeited/Cancelled | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | |
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | 97 |
| | 83 |
| | 180 |
| | $ | 11.57 |
| | |
| Exercised | (57 | ) | | (48 | ) | | (105 | ) | | $ | 11.61 |
| | $ | 1,029 |
|
| Forfeited/Cancelled | (18 | ) | | — |
| | (18 | ) | | $ | 11.00 |
| | |
| Outstanding and Exercisable as of December 31, 2014 | 22 |
| | 35 |
| | 57 |
| | $ | 11.69 |
| | |
The following table summarizes information about employee and director stock options under all of the plans mentioned above as of December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE | |
Range of Exercise Prices | | Number of Awards (#) | | | Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Yrs) | | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($) | | | Total
Intrinsic
Value | |
$0.00 - $8.95 | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
$8.96 - $14.45 | | | 181 | | | | 2.17 | | | $ | 11.57 | | | | 1,605 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 181 | | | | 2.17 | | | $ | 11.57 | | | $ | 1,605 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE |
| Range of Exercise Prices | Number of Awards (#) | | Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(Yrs) | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($) | | Total
Intrinsic
Value |
| $0.00 - $9.13 | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| $9.13 - $14.45 | 57 |
| | 1.56 |
| | $ | 11.69 |
| | 713 |
|
| | 57 |
| | 1.56 |
| | $ | 11.69 |
| | $ | 713 |
|
No compensation expense was recorded during the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
2012 or
20112012 as a result of the grant date fair value having been fully amortized as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31,
2013,2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options.
Restricted Stock
Appreciation RightsAlthough no such requirement exists, SARs have historically been granted (if any) on the first trading day of each year to certain Kforce executives based on the extent by which
Kforce's annual
long-term incentive performance goals, which are established by Kforce’s Compensation Committee during the first 90 days of the year of performance, are certified by the Compensation Committee as having been met. SARs generally cliff vest three years from the date of issuance; however, vesting is accelerated if Kforce’s stock price exceeds the stock price at the date of grant by 30% for a period of 10 trading days, or if the Compensation Committee determines that the criteria for acceleration are satisfied. There were no SARs granted during the three years ended December 31, 2013.There was no SARs activity during the year ended December 31, 2013 or 2012. Therefore, the following table presents only the activity for the year ended December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number
of SARs | | | Weighted Average
Exercise Price Per
SAR | | | Total Intrinsic
Value of SARs
Exercised | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010 | | | 169 | | | $ | 10.32 | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (169 | ) | | $ | 10.32 | | | $ | 1,278 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
No compensation expense was recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2013 due to the grant date fair value being fully amortized as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2013, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to SARs.
Restricted Stock
Restrictedrestricted stock grants made to Kforce’s executives and management are generally based on the extent by which annual long-term incentive performance goals, which are established by Kforce’s Compensation Committee during the first quarter of the year of performance, have been met, as certifieddetermined by the Compensation Committee. Additionally, Kforce, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, grants restricted stock in varying amounts as determined appropriate during the year to retain executives and management. Restricted stock granted by Kforce contains time-based vesting terms ranging fromduring the year ended December 31, 2014 will vest over a period of two to ten years, and, forwith equal vesting annually.
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, Kforce granted certain restricted stock awards includescontaining time-based vesting terms of ten years with an equal number of shares vesting in each of years six through ten, as well as a performance-accelerationperformance-accelerations feature upon which vesting would accelerate if Kforce’sKforce's closing stock price exceeded the stock price at the date of grant by a pre-established percentage (which historically ranged from 40 - 50%) for a period of 10ten trading days, or ifdays. During the Compensation Committee determined thatthree months ended March 31, 2014, the criteria for acceleration was satisfied. Kforce refers to restricted stockFirm modified all awards containing only a time-based vesting term as restricted stock whereas restricted stock containing both a time-based vesting term and a performance-acceleration feature is referred to by the Company as performance-accelerated restricted stock. Duringthat were granted during the three months ended December 31, 2013, Kforce granted restricted stockas follows: (1) eliminated the performance-acceleration feature and performance-accelerated restricted stock both having a(2) reduced the time-based vesting term to five years, with equal vesting annually. The total number of restricted shares impacted by this modification was 268 thousand, excluding already forfeited shares, and the number of employees impacted was 87. The total incremental compensation cost resulting from the modification was $109 thousand, which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of ten years with 20%the modified awards.
Restricted stock contain
the same voting rights
as other common stock and are included in the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Restricted stock
granted contain the right to
forfeitable dividends in the form of additional shares of restricted stock at the same rate as the cash dividend on common stock and containing the same vesting provisions as the underlying award. The following table presents the activity for the three years ended December 31,
2013: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of Restricted Stock | | | Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | | Total Intrinsic
Value of Restricted
Stock
Vested | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010 | | | 1,898 | | | $ | 12.34 | | | | | |
Granted (a) | | | 1,604 | | | $ | 16.31 | | | | | |
Vested | | | (168 | ) | | $ | 11.41 | | | $ | 2,592 | |
Forfeited | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | | | 3,334 | | | $ | 14.30 | | | | | |
Granted | | | 288 | | | $ | 12.67 | | | | | |
Vested | | | (3,191 | ) | | $ | 14.15 | | | $ | 47,407 | |
Forfeited (a) | | | (393 | ) | | $ | 16.37 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | | | 38 | | | $ | 12.11 | | | | | |
Granted | | | 904 | | | $ | 16.72 | | | | | |
Vested | | | (109 | ) | | $ | 14.15 | | | $ | 2,092 | |
Forfeited | | | (22 | ) | | $ | 15.43 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | | | 811 | | | $ | 16.89 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Restricted Stock | | Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Total Intrinsic
Value of Restricted
Stock Vested |
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2011 | 3,334 |
| | $ | 14.30 |
| | — |
|
| Granted | 288 |
| | $ | 12.67 |
| | — |
|
| Vested | (3,191 | ) | | $ | 14.15 |
| | $ | 47,407 |
|
| Forfeited (a) | (393 | ) | | $ | 16.37 |
| | — |
|
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | 38 |
| | $ | 12.11 |
| | — |
|
| Granted | 904 |
| | $ | 16.72 |
| | — |
|
| Vested | (109 | ) | | $ | 14.15 |
| | $ | 2,092 |
|
| Forfeited | (22 | ) | | $ | 15.43 |
| | — |
|
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | 811 |
| | $ | 16.89 |
| | — |
|
| Granted | 528 |
| | $ | 20.18 |
| | — |
|
| Vested | (273 | ) | | $ | 17.37 |
| | $ | 5,624 |
|
| Forfeited | (84 | ) | | $ | 18.38 |
| | — |
|
| Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 | 982 |
| | $ | 18.55 |
| | — |
|
| |
| (a) | Included in the restricted stock granted during the year ended December 31, 2011 are 689 shares of performance-based restricted stock which were subject to forfeiture based upon the level of attainment of performance conditions pre-established by the Compensation Committee. In February 2012, the Compensation Committee certified 2011 performance measures, which resulted in the forfeiture of approximately 393 thousand of these shares of restricted stock which was consistent with estimated forfeitures during 2011 that was used for compensation expense recognition purposes. |
The fair market value of restricted stock is determined based on the closing stock price of Kforce’s common stock at the date of grant, and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For
In connection with the
performance-accelerateddisposition of HIM, as discussed within Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations,” stock-based compensation related to acceleration of restricted stock
the requisite service period is the derived service period, which is determined using a Monte Carlo model.was approximately $0.6 million.
In connection with the Firm’s organizational realignment, Kforce terminated two of its
NEOscovered executive officers during the three months ended December 31, 2013. In connection with their termination, Kforce accelerated the vesting of their restricted stock and, as a result, accelerated all of the related unrecognized compensation expense associated with these awards of
$1,078$1.1 million during the three months ended December 31, 2013.
As discussed within Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations,” the Board approved the vesting acceleration of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested long-term incentives, including the restricted stock, effective March 31, 2012. As a result of the acceleration, Kforce accelerated all of the previously unrecognized compensation expense associated with these awards of
$22,158$22.2 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2012.Kforce recognized total compensation expense related to restricted stock of $2,570, $26,243 and $11,976 during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 2013.
As of December 31,
2013,2014, total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock was
$7,525,$11.5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of
4.14.8 years.
15.
Common Stock
As discussed within Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations,” the transaction expense related to the sale of HIM included commissions and transaction bonuses paid by the Firm in the form of Kforce common stock. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce issued 92 thousand shares of common stock and recognized stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.8 million.
14. Organizational Realignment
During October 2013, the Firm commenced a plan to streamline its leadership and support-related structure to better align a higher percentage of personnel in roles that are closest to the customer through an organizational realignment. The new organizational design
iswas intended to provide improved accountability and deliver better results for our clients, consultants and core personnel. As a result of the organizational realignment, Kforce incurred severance and termination-related expenses of
$7,097$7.1 million during the three months ended December 31, 2013, which
iswas recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statementConsolidated Statement of
operationsOperations and
comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss). The severance and termination-related expenses included the acceleration of previously unrecorded stock compensation expense of
$1,078. Additionally, in connection with the realignment and succession planning, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses of $3,606 paid to a broad group of senior management during the fourth quarter of 2013. As of December 31, 2013, Kforce accrued approximately $1,416 of severance and termination-related expenses, which is expected to be paid during the first quarter of 2014 and is recorded in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. There were no realignment charges incurred during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.16.$1.1 million.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Kforce leases space and operating assets under operating and capital leases expiring at various dates, with some leases cancelable upon 30 to 90
daysdays' notice and with some leases containing escalation in rent clauses. The leases require Kforce to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, in addition to rental payments.
Future minimum lease payments, inclusive of accelerated lease payments, under non-cancelable capital and operating leases are summarized as
follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | | 2017 | | | 2018 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
Capital leases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Present value of payments | | $ | 1,256 | | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 313 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,620 | |
Interest | | | 2,283 | | | | 2,212 | | | | 959 | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,462 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital lease payments | | $ | 3,539 | | | $ | 3,212 | | | $ | 1,272 | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,082 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating leases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Facilities | | $ | 5,373 | | | $ | 3,635 | | | $ | 2,342 | | | $ | 748 | | | $ | 424 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 12,541 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 37 | | | | 18 | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 63 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating leases | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 3,653 | | | $ | 2,350 | | | $ | 748 | | | $ | 424 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 12,604 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total leases | | $ | 8,949 | | | $ | 6,865 | | | $ | 3,622 | | | $ | 807 | | | $ | 424 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 20,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Capital leases | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Present value of payments | $ | 1,090 |
| | $ | 429 |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,652 |
|
| Interest | 51 |
| | 41 |
| | 13 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 107 |
|
| Capital lease payments | $ | 1,141 |
| | $ | 470 |
| | $ | 142 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,759 |
|
| Operating leases | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Facilities | $ | 6,236 |
| | $ | 5,464 |
| | $ | 3,601 |
| | $ | 1,634 |
| | $ | 716 |
| | $ | 339 |
| | $ | 17,990 |
|
| Furniture and equipment | 112 |
| | 34 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 146 |
|
| Total operating leases | $ | 6,348 |
| | $ | 5,498 |
| | $ | 3,601 |
| | $ | 1,634 |
| | $ | 716 |
| | $ | 339 |
| | $ | 18,136 |
|
| Total leases | $ | 7,489 |
| | $ | 5,968 |
| | $ | 3,743 |
| | $ | 1,640 |
| | $ | 716 |
| | $ | 339 |
| | $ | 19,895 |
|
The present value of the minimum lease payments for capital lease obligations has been classified in other current liabilities and long-term debt – other, according to their respective maturities. Rental expense under operating leases was
$5,265, $5,225$5.6 million, $5.3 million and
$6,027$5.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012,
and 2011, respectively.
Kforce has entered into various commitments including, among others, a compensation software hosting and licensing arrangement, and a commitment for data center fees for certain of our information technology applications. As of December 31,
2013,2014, these commitments amounted to approximately
$10,787$12.6 million and are expected to be paid as follows:
$6,165 in 2014; $3,762$7.6 million in 2015;
$860$4.0 million in 2016;
$1.0 million in 2017; $11 thousand in 2018; and
$0nil in
2017 and 2018.2019.
Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. At December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce had letters of credit outstanding for workers’ compensation and other insurance coverage totaling
$2,360,$2.7 million, and for facility lease deposits totaling
$305.$0.5 million.
Litigation
On June 18, 2013, Kforce, along with other staffing firms, was named as a defendant
We are involved in a class action lawsuit filedlegal proceedings, claims, and administrative matters that arise in the Orange County Superior Court of the State of California. The plaintiff alleges that a class of current and former Kforce employees working in California was denied compensation for the time they spent interviewing with current and potential clients of Kforce, over a period covering four years prior to the filing of the complaint. The plaintiff seeks recovery in an unspecified amount for this alleged unpaid compensation, the alleged failure of Kforce to provide them with accurate wage statements, the alleged improper use of debit cards as an employee payment mechanism in certain circumstances, alleged unfair competition, and statutory penalties, attorney’s fees and other damages. On August 30, 2013, Kforce moved the matter to the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California, Case No. 8:13cv1356. On January 30, 2014, the U.S. District Court of Central District of California substantially granted summary judgment in favor of Kforce with the exception of the plaintiff’s claim for waiting time penalties, which is an individual claim and not part of the class action. The case has been remanded to Orange County Superior Court. Absent a successful appeal of the class action allegations by the plaintiff, this case does not present a reasonable possibility of material loss. At this stage of the litigation for the individual claim, it is not reasonable to estimate the outcome or a range of loss, should a loss occur. Accordingly, no amounts have been provided for in Kforce’s Consolidated Financial Statements.On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida unsealed a qui tam complaint that had been filed by a terminated former employee in June of last year. The complaint was filed against Kforce and Kforce Government Solutions Inc. (“KGS”). It alleges False Claims Act and federal and state whistleblower statute violations and certain accounting irregularities, as well as employment law and defamation claims. The United States government has not intervened in this action at this time. While the qui tam action was first disclosed to Kforce and KGS on February 19, 2014, counsel for the former employee previously informed Kforce and KGS of substantially similar allegations in a postemployment demand letter. After the allegations were raised, the matter was referred to the Audit Committee of Kforce’s Board of Directors for investigation. The Audit Committee retained experienced, independent counsel for an investigation. With the help of forensic accountants, the investigators concluded that the False Claims Act and accounting irregularity allegations raised in the demand letter were unsupported by material, credible evidence. Due to, among other things, this independent investigation, Kforce and KGS believe the allegations in the complaint are factually inaccurate and without merit. Kforce and KGS intend to vigorously defend the litigation. At this stage of the litigation, it is not reasonable to estimate the outcome or a range of loss, should a loss occur. Accordingly, no amounts have been provided for in Kforce’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the ordinary course of its business, Kforceour business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters for which an accrual has not been made, we have not yet determined that a loss is from time to time threatened with litigationprobable or named as a defendant in various lawsuits and administrative proceedings.the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While management doesthe ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of these other mattersparticular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour consolidated financial position, results of operations, financial position or cash flows, litigation is subject to certain inherent uncertainties.flows. Kforce maintains liability insurance in such amounts and with such coverage and deductibles as management believes is reasonable. The principal liability risks that Kforce insures against are workers’ compensation, personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and omissions, employment practices liability and fidelity losses. There can be no assurance that Kforce’s liability insurance will cover all events or that the limits of coverage will be sufficient to fully cover all liabilities.
Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible. In each case, however, except where otherwise noted, we have either determined that the range of loss is not reasonably estimable or that any reasonably estimable range of loss is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida unsealed a qui tam complaint that had been filed by a terminated former employee in June of 2013. The complaint was filed against Kforce and Kforce Government Solutions Inc., was captioned United States of America and William Turner, Relator v. Kforce Government Solutions Inc. and Kforce Inc., Case No. 8:13-cv-1517-T-36TBM, and was amended on April 14, 2014. The amended complaint alleges False Claims Act and federal and state whistleblower statute violations and certain accounting irregularities, as well as employment law and defamation claims. On June 13, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On October 8, 2014, the United States government filed a notice of its election to decline to intervene in the case. On November 10, 2014, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss all federal claims with prejudice, and also dismissed the state law claims without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Turner appealed the court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, where the case is currently pending as USCA Case No. 14-15529.
Tax Audits
Kforce is
not awareperiodically subject to IRS audits, as well as state and other local income tax audits for various tax years. During 2014, the IRS finished an examination of
any litigation that would reasonably be expected to have aKforce’s U.S. income tax return for 2010 and 2011 with no material
effect on its results of operations, its cash flows or its financial condition.Tax Audits
adjustments. During 2013, the IRS finished an examination of Kforce’s USUnited States income tax return for 2009 with no material adjustments, and no settlements. During 2013,Although Kforce has not experienced any material liabilities in the IRS commenced a Limited Issue Focused Exam of Kforce’s 2010 and 2011 U.Spast due to income tax returns. No material liabilities and expected to result fromaudits, Kforce can make no assurances that this ongoing examination. During 2012, Kforce was audited by state taxing authorities for sales, income and gross receipts taxes, which in some cases covered multiple years. In 2012, the tax audits were settled for $1,624 in cash.
will continue.
Kforce has entered into employment agreements with certain executives that provide for minimum compensation, salary and continuation of certain benefits for a six-month to a three-year period under certain circumstances. Certain of the agreements also provide for a severance payment of one to three times annual salary and one half to three times average annual bonus if such an agreement is terminated without good cause by
the employerKforce or for good reason by the
employee.executive. These agreements contain certain post-employment restrictive covenants. Kforce’s liability at December 31,
2013 was2014 would be approximately
$39,804$19.2 million if,
following a change in control, all of the
employeesexecutives under contract were terminated without good cause by the employer or
if the
employeesexecutives resigned for good reason
followingand $41.6 million if, in the absence of a change in control,
and $12,686 if all of the
employeesexecutives under contract were terminated by Kforce without good cause or
if the
employeesexecutives resigned for good
reason in the absence of a change of control.reason.
Kforce has not recorded any liability related to the employment agreements as no events have occurred that would require payment under the agreements.
17.
Kforce’s reportable segments are as follows:
(i) Tech, (ii) FA, (iii) HIM(1) Tech; (2) FA; and
(iv)(3) GS. This determination is supported by, among other factors: the existence of
segment presidentsindividuals responsible for the operations of each segment and who also report directly to our chief operating decision
makemaker (“CODM”), the nature of the segment’s operations and information presented to the Board of Directors and our CODM.
Kforce also reports Flexible billings and Search fees separately by segment, which has been incorporated into the table below. The
Firm’s realignment plan, asfollowing table has been updated to reflect the disposition of HIM and KCR. As described
more fully in Note
152 –
“Organizational Realignment”, did not cause any changes to“Discontinued Operations,” all revenues and gross profit associated with the
compositiondiscontinued operations have been recorded within income from discontinued operations, net of
our reportable segments.tax, in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Historically, and through our year ended December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce has generated only sales and gross profit information on a segment basis. Substantially all operations and long-lived assets are located in the United States. We do not report total assets
or income from continuing operations separately by segment as our operations are largely combined.
The following table has been updated to reflect the disposition of KCR. As described in Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations,” all revenues and gross profit associated with the discontinued operation have been recorded within income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).The following table provides information concerning the operations of our segments for the years ended December 31,
2014, 2013
and 2012
and 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Technology | | | Finance and
Accounting | | | Health Information
Management | | | Government
Solutions | | | Total | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flexible billings | | $ | 720,179 | | | $ | 213,158 | | | $ | 77,745 | | | $ | 91,949 | | | $ | 1,103,031 | |
Search fees | | | 19,183 | | | | 29,259 | | | | 414 | | | | — | | | | 48,856 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 739,362 | | | $ | 242,417 | | | $ | 78,159 | | | $ | 91,949 | | | $ | 1,151,887 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 219,360 | | | $ | 93,663 | | | $ | 25,236 | | | $ | 31,353 | | | $ | 369,612 | |
2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flexible billings | | $ | 655,062 | | | $ | 211,797 | | | $ | 76,517 | | | $ | 91,424 | | | $ | 1,034,800 | |
Search fees | | | 20,525 | | | | 26,679 | | | | 475 | | | | — | | | | 47,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 675,587 | | | $ | 238,476 | | | $ | 76,992 | | | $ | 91,424 | | | $ | 1,082,479 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 200,738 | | | $ | 91,124 | | | $ | 27,347 | | | $ | 28,724 | | | $ | 347,933 | |
2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Flexible billings | | $ | 606,238 | | | $ | 194,359 | | | $ | 68,181 | | | $ | 92,449 | | | $ | 961,227 | |
Search fees | | | 17,774 | | | | 25,216 | | | | 530 | | | | — | | | | 43,520 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 624,012 | | | $ | 219,575 | | | $ | 68,711 | | | $ | 92,449 | | | $ | 1,004,747 | |
Gross profit | | $ | 182,862 | | | $ | 82,028 | | | $ | 24,476 | | | $ | 28,381 | | | $ | 317,747 | |
18.(in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Technology | | Finance and
Accounting | | Government
Solutions | | Total |
| 2014 | | | | | | | |
| Net service revenues | | | | | | | |
| Flexible billings | $ | 823,311 |
| | $ | 249,274 |
| | $ | 98,051 |
| | $ | 1,170,636 |
|
| Search fees | 19,158 |
| | 27,537 |
| | — |
| | 46,695 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 842,469 |
| | $ | 276,811 |
| | $ | 98,051 |
| | $ | 1,217,331 |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 243,085 |
| | $ | 101,071 |
| | $ | 30,425 |
| | $ | 374,581 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | 326,624 |
|
| Income from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | | | | | $ | 47,957 |
|
| 2013 | | | | | | | |
| Net service revenues | | | | | | | |
| Flexible billings | $ | 720,179 |
| | $ | 213,158 |
| | $ | 91,949 |
| | $ | 1,025,286 |
|
| Search fees | 19,183 |
| | 29,259 |
| | — |
| | 48,442 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 739,362 |
| | $ | 242,417 |
| | $ | 91,949 |
| | $ | 1,073,728 |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 219,360 |
| | $ | 93,663 |
| | $ | 31,353 |
| | $ | 344,376 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | 333,447 |
|
| Income from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | | | | | $ | 10,929 |
|
| 2012 | | | | | | | |
| Net service revenues | | | | | | | |
| Flexible billings | $ | 655,062 |
| | $ | 211,797 |
| | $ | 91,424 |
| | $ | 958,283 |
|
| Search fees | 20,525 |
| | 26,679 |
| | — |
| | 47,204 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 675,587 |
| | $ | 238,476 |
| | $ | 91,424 |
| | $ | 1,005,487 |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 200,738 |
| | $ | 91,124 |
| | $ | 28,724 |
| | $ | 320,586 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | 386,944 |
|
| Loss from continuing operations, before income taxes | | | | | | | $ | (66,358 | ) |
17. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The quarterly financial data presented below has been adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the discontinued operations of
KCR,HIM, which is more fully described in Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |
| | | March 31 | | | June 30 | | | September 30 | | | December 31 | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | $ | 265,627 | | | $ | 283,689 | | | $ | 299,652 | | | $ | 302,919 | |
Gross profit | | | 83,336 | | | | 92,847 | | | | 97,312 | | | | 96,117 | |
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes | | | 3,094 | | | | 6,948 | | | | 8,979 | | | | (8,234 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | | 3,094 | | | | 6,948 | | | | 8,979 | | | | (8,234 | ) |
Earnings (loss) per share-basic | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
Earnings (loss) per share-diluted | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| | | | |
2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net service revenues | | $ | 268,350 | | | $ | 274,129 | | | $ | 270,161 | | | $ | 269,839 | |
Gross profit | | | 80,825 | | | | 89,766 | | | | 88,762 | | | | 88,580 | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of income taxes | | | (17,727 | ) | | | (33,182 | ) | | | 9,275 | | | | 5,922 | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | | 21,803 | | | | 15 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 198 | |
Net income (loss) | | | 4,076 | | | | (33,167 | ) | | | 9,268 | | | | 6,120 | |
Earnings (loss) per share-basic | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | (0.90 | ) | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.17 | |
Earnings (loss) per share-diluted | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | (0.90 | ) | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.17 | |
Certain prior quarter amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation and may not tie back to quarterly filings. The following table provides quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED |
| | March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 |
| 2014 | | | | | | | |
| Net service revenues | $ | 282,024 |
| | $ | 302,758 |
| | $ | 313,810 |
| | $ | 318,739 |
|
| Gross profit | 83,526 |
| | 94,386 |
| | 98,291 |
| | 98,378 |
|
| Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes | 4,389 |
| | 7,953 |
| | 7,995 |
| | 9,061 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 1,860 |
| | 2,750 |
| | 57,023 |
| | (116 | ) |
| Net income | 6,249 |
| | 10,703 |
| | 65,018 |
| | 8,945 |
|
| Earnings per share-basic | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 2.07 |
| | $ | 0.30 |
|
| Earnings per share-diluted | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 2.06 |
| | $ | 0.30 |
|
| 2013 | | | | | | | |
| Net service revenues | $ | 246,991 |
| | $ | 264,720 |
| | $ | 279,956 |
| | $ | 282,061 |
|
| Gross profit | 77,355 |
| | 86,595 |
| | 91,055 |
| | 89,371 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes | 1,929 |
| | 5,443 |
| | 7,636 |
| | (9,714 | ) |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | 1,165 |
| | 1,505 |
| | 1,343 |
| | 1,480 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 3,094 |
| | 6,948 |
| | 8,979 |
| | (8,234 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share-basic | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | (0.25 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per share-diluted | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | (0.25 | ) |
During the third quarter of 2014, in connection with the disposition of HIM, the income from discontinued operations included a gain, net of transactions costs, on the sale of discontinued operations of $94.3 million pretax, or $56.1 million after tax. The transactions costs primarily included legal fees, stock-based compensation related to the acceleration of restricted stock, commissions and transaction bonuses in the form of cash and common stock, which in the aggregate, totaled $11.0 million. Stock-based compensation related to the acceleration of restricted stock and transaction bonuses paid in stock in lieu of cash was $2.4 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Firm executed an organizational realignment plan and incurred severance and termination-related expenses of $7,097$7.1 million and a Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses related to the realignment of $3,606. Additionally, during the fourth quarter$3.6 million.
Table of 2013, Kforce recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $14,510.During the first quarter of 2012, in connection with the disposition of KCR, the Board exercised its discretion, as permitted under the Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, to accelerate the vesting, for tax planning purposes, of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and ALTI effective March 31, 2012. The acceleration resulted in the recognition of previously unrecognized compensation expense of $31,297, which includes $784 of payroll taxes. This expense has been classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2012, Kforce recorded an estimated goodwill impairment charge of $65,300. Kforce completed the step 2 impairment analysis and recorded an additional goodwill impairment charge of $3,858 during the fourth quarter of 2012.
19.Contents
18. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is as follows for the year ended December
31: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes, net | | $ | 14,789 | | | $ | 14,456 | | | $ | 8,747 | |
| | | |
Interest, net | | $ | 800 | | | $ | 554 | | | $ | 838 | |
| | | |
Non-Cash Transaction Information: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax benefit from disqualifying dispositions of stock options and restricted stock | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 145 | |
Shares tendered in payment of exercise price of stock options and SARs | | $ | — | | | $ | 161 | | | $ | 2,401 | |
Common Stock transactions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock purchase plan | | $ | 613 | | | $ | 647 | | | $ | 705 | |
Equipment acquired under capital leases | | $ | 1,929 | | | $ | 672 | | | $ | 1,166 | |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures. |
31 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | |
| Income taxes, net | $ | 52,565 |
| | $ | 14,789 |
| | $ | 14,456 |
|
| Interest, net | $ | 1,048 |
| | $ | 800 |
| | $ | 554 |
|
| Non-Cash Transaction Information: | | | | | |
| Tax benefit from disqualifying dispositions of stock options and restricted stock | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 36 |
|
| Shares tendered in payment of exercise price of stock options and SARs | $ | 84 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 161 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | $ | 699 |
| | $ | 613 |
| | $ | 647 |
|
| Equipment acquired under capital leases | $ | 313 |
| | $ | 1,929 |
| | $ | 672 |
|
| Unsettled repurchases of common stock | $ | 1,425 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,498 |
|
| Contingent consideration for acquisition | $ | 477 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (the “Evaluation”), as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)CEO and
Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”),CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (“Disclosure Controls”). Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is:
(i)(1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and
(ii)(2) accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There has not been any change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the Evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended December 31,
20132014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
CEO and CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading, is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Kforce is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Kforce’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Kforce’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and the CFO, Kforce’s management assessed the effectiveness of Kforce’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2013.2014. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(1992)(2013). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31,
2013,2014, Kforce’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Kforce’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is presented in Item 8.
Item 9B. | Other Information. |
None.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by Item 10 relating to our directors, executive officers and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the
20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31,
2013.2014.
We have adopted a
Commitment to Integrity that amends and restates our prior Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
thatPolicy. Our Commitment to Integrity applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, as well as consultants, agents and other representatives retained by
the Kforce. This codeKforce and is publicly available on our website at www.kforce.com. Any amendments to, or waiver from, any provision of
the Code of Ethics and Business Conductour Commitment to Integrity will be posted on our website at the above address.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by Item 11 relating to executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the
20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31,
2013.Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
2014.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by Item 12 relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholders matters is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the
20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31,
2013.2014.
Information regarding equity compensation plans required by this item is included in Item
55. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities of Part II of this report and is incorporated into this item by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by Item 13 relating to certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the
20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31,
2013.Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services. |
2014.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 14 relating to principal
accountantaccounting fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the
20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31,
2013.2014.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. |
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this Report: |
1. Financial Statements. The list of consolidated financial statements, and related notes thereto, along with the independent auditors’ report are set forth in Part IV of this report in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule presented below.
2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule.The consolidated financial statement schedule of Kforce is included in Part IV of this report on the page indicated by the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule presented below. This financial statement schedule should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of Kforce. Schedules not listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the
Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits.See Item 15(b) below. | |
| (b) | Exhibits.The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are incorporated by reference into this Item 15(b) and are a part of this report. |
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
| | |
| |
| |
| | 42 | |
| |
Consolidated Financial Statements: | | | | |
| | | 43 | |
| | | 44 | |
| | | 45 | |
| | | 46 | |
| |
| | 47 | |
| |
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule: | | | | |
| | | 76 | |
KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
COLUMN A | | COLUMN B | | | COLUMN C | | | COLUMN D | | | COLUMN E | |
DESCRIPTION | | BALANCE AT
BEGINNING OF | | | CHARGED TO
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
(RECOVERY) | | | CHARGED
TO OTHER
ACCOUNTS (a) | | | DEDUCTIONS (b) | | | BALANCE AT
END OF
PERIOD | |
Accounts receivable reserves | | | 2011 | | | $ | 4,021 | | | | (1,103 | ) | | | 166 | | | | (627 | ) | | $ | 2,457 | |
| | | 2012 | | | $ | 2,457 | | | | 1,249 | | | | (70 | ) | | | (1,483 | ) | | $ | 2,153 | |
| | | 2013 | | | $ | 2,153 | | | | 382 | | | | (54 | ) | | | (453 | ) | | $ | 2,028 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| COLUMN A | COLUMN B | | COLUMN C | | COLUMN D | | COLUMN E |
| DESCRIPTION | BALANCE AT
BEGINNING OF | | CHARGED TO
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
(RECOVERY) | | CHARGED
TO OTHER
ACCOUNTS (a) | | DEDUCTIONS (b) | | BALANCE AT
END OF
PERIOD |
| Accounts receivable reserves | 2012 | | $ | 2,457 |
| | 1,249 |
| | (70 | ) | | (1,483 | ) | | $ | 2,153 |
|
| | 2013 | | $ | 2,153 |
| | 382 |
| | (54 | ) | | (453 | ) | | $ | 2,028 |
|
| | 2014 | | $ | 2,028 |
| | 530 |
| | 31 |
| | (549 | ) | | $ | 2,040 |
|
| |
| (a) | Charged to other accounts includes the provision for fallouts of search placements that has been deducted from net service revenues in the accompanying consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of incomeIncome and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Income (Loss). |
| |
| (b) | Deductions include write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable and fallouts of search placements that have been charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivables reserves. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
| | | | | | |
| | | | KFORCE INC. |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ DAVID L. DUNKEL |
| | | | | | David L. Dunkel |
| | | | | | Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ DAVID L. DUNKEL |
| | | | | | David L. Dunkel |
| | | | | | Director and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ DAVID M. KELLY |
| | | | | | David M. Kelly |
| | | | | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | | (Principal Financial Officer) |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ SARA R. NICHOLS |
| | | | | | Sara R. Nichols |
| | | | | | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
| | | | | | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ JOHN N. ALLRED |
| | | | | | John N. Allred |
| | | | | | Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ W.R. CAREY, JR. |
| | | | | | W.R. Carey, Jr. |
| | | | | | Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ RICHARD M. COCCHIARO |
| | | | | | Richard M. Cocchiaro |
| | | | | | Vice Chairman and Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ MARK F. FURLONG |
| | | | | | Mark F. Furlong |
| | | | | | Director |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ ELAINE D. ROSEN |
| | | | | | Elaine D. Rosen |
| | | | | | Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ A. GORDON TUNSTALL |
| | | | | | A. Gordon Tunstall |
| | | | | | Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ RALPH E. STRUZZIERO |
| | | | | | Ralph E. Struzziero |
| | | | | | Director |
| | | |
Date: February 27, 20142015 | | | | By: | | /s/ HOWARD W. SUTTER |
| | | | | | Howard W. Sutter |
| | | | | | Vice Chairman and Director |
| | | |
| Date: February 27, 2015 | | | | By: | | /s/ N. JOHN SIMMONS |
| | | | | | N. John Simmons |
| | | | | | Director |
|
| | |
Exhibit
Number
| | Description
|
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
| 3.1 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-91738) filed with the SEC on May 9, 1996. |
| |
| 3.1a | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No. 333-111566) filed with the SEC on February 9, 2004, as amended. |
| |
| 3.1b | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No. 333-111566) filed with the SEC on February 9, 2004, as amended. |
| |
| 3.1c | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No. 333-111566) filed with the SEC on February 9, 2004, as amended. |
| |
| 3.1d | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on May 17, 2000. |
| |
| 3.1e | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on March 29, 2002. |
| |
| 3.2 | | Amended & Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on April 29, 2013. |
| |
| 4.1 | | Form of Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-158086) filed with the SEC on March 18, 2009. |
| |
| 4.2 | | Form of Indenture, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-181004) filed with the SEC on April 27, 2012. |
| |
| 9.1 | | Form of Parent Voting Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2003, by and between the Registrant and certain stockholders of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-111566) filed with the SEC on December 24, 2003, as amended. |
| |
| 9.2 | | Form of Voting Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2003, by and between Hall Kinion & Associates, Inc. and certain stockholders of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-111566) filed with the SEC on December 24, 2003, as amended. |
| |
| 10.1 | | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 20, 2011, between Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries and Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders thereto, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on September 23, 2011. |
| |
| 10.2 | | Consent and First Amendment, dated March 30, 2012, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries and Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders thereto, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on May 7, 2012. |
| |
| 10.3 | | Second Amendment and Joinder, dated December 27, 2013, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries and Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders thereto.thereto, incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on February 27, 2014. |
| |
| 10.4 | | Third Amendment, dated December 23, 2014, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries and Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders thereto, incorporated by reference to the REgistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 23, 2014. |
| |
|
| | |
10.4* | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| |
| 10.5* | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2013,December 31, 2006, between the Registrant and David L. Dunkel, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on January 3, 2013. |
| 8, 2007. |
10.5* | |
| 10.6* | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2008, between Kforce Inc. and David L. Dunkel, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 29, 2008. |
| |
10.6* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2006, between the Registrant and William L. Sanders, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on January 8, 2007. |
| |
10.7* | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2008, between Kforce Inc. and William L. Sanders, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 29, 2008. |
| | |
Exhibit
Number
| | Description
|
| |
10.8*10.7* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2006, between the Registrant and Joseph J. Liberatore, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on January 8, 2007. |
| |
10.9*10.8* | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2008, between Kforce Inc. and Joseph J. Liberatore, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 29, 2008. |
| |
10.10* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2006, between the Registrant and Michael Ettore, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on January 8, 2007. |
| |
10.11* | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2008, between Kforce Inc. and Michael Ettore, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 29, 2008. |
| |
10.12*10.9* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2003, between the Registrant and Howard Sutter, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on March 11, 2009. |
| |
10.13*10.10* | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2008, between Kforce Inc. and Howard Sutter, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on March 11, 2009. |
| |
10.14* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2009, between Kforce Inc. and Randy Marmon, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on October 8, 2009. |
| |
10.1510.11 | | Administrative Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2009, between and among Kforce Government Solutions, Inc., on behalf of itself, Kforce Global Solutions, Inc., and Bradson Corporation and the U.S. Department of the Interior, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on December 30, 2009. |
| |
10.1610.12 | | Amended Administrative Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2012, between and among Kforce Government Solutions, Inc. and the U.S. Department of the Interior, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on May 7, 2012. |
| |
10.17*10.13* | | Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-168529) filed with the SEC on August 4, 2010. |
| |
10.18*10.14* | | Kforce Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-188631) filed with the SEC on May 15, 2013. |
| |
10.19*10.15* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2011, between the Registrant and Richard M. Cocchiaro, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on August 4, 2011. |
| |
10.20*10.16* | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on March 4, 2011. |
| |
10.2110.17 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2012,August 4, 2014, by and among Kforce Inc., Kforce Clinical Research, and RCM Acquisition, Inc. and inVentiv Health, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2012. |
| August 6, 2014. |
10.22 | | |
| 10.18 | | Amendment #1 to Stock Ownership Guidelines, dated September 28, 2012, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on October 4, 2012. |
| |
10.23*10.19* | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2013, between Kforce Inc. and David M. Kelly, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on January 3, 2013. |
| |
10.24*10.20* | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q (File No. 000-26058) filed with the SEC on October 30, 2013. |
|
| | |
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
| 21 | | List of Subsidiaries. |
| |
| 23 | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
| |
| 31.1 | | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of Kforce Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| 31.2 | | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Kforce Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| 32.1 | | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of Kforce Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| 32.2 | | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Kforce Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| 101.1 | | The Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule listed in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K are formatted in XBRL. |
|
| |
| * | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
81