UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014January 28, 2017

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-36212

 

VINCE HOLDING CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware

75-3264870

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1441 Broadway—6th

500 5th Avenue—20th Floor

New York, New York 1001810110

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(212) 515-2600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation of S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

AsThe aggregate market value of August 2, 2013,the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of July 30, 2016, the last business day of the Registrant’sregistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, which ended August 3, 2013,was approximately $102.4 million based on a closing price per share of $5.00 as reported on the Registrant’s common stock was not publicly traded.

New York Stock Exchange on July 29, 2016. As of March 28, 2014,31, 2017, there were 36,723,72749,427,606 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the registrant’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 


Table of Contents

 

Page
Number

Page
Number

PART I

4

PART I.

Item 1.

Item 1

Business

4

4

Item 1A1A.

Risk Factors

8

10

Item 1B1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

24

31

Item 22.

Properties

24

31

Item 33.

Legal Proceedings

25

32

Item 44.

Mine Safety Disclosures

25

32

PART II.II

26

Item 55.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

26

33

Item 66.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

28

35

Item 77.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

30

37

Item 7A7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

44

57

Item 88.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

45

57

Item 99.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

45

57

Item 9A9A.

Controls and Procedures

45

57

Item 9B9B.

Other Information

46

58

Part III.

PART III

47

Item 1010.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

47

59

Item 1111.

Executive Compensation

47

66

Item 1212.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

47

81

Item 1313.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

47

84

Item 1414.

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

47

90

Part IV.

PART IV

47

Item 1515.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

47

92

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

49

2


INTRODUCTORY NOTE

On November 27, 2013, Vince Holding Corp. (“VHC” or the “Company”) completed, previously known as Apparel Holding Corp., closed an initial public offering (the “IPO”(“IPO”) of 11,500,000 shares of VHCits common stock atand completed a public offering priceseries of $20.00 per share, including 1,500,000 shares of VHC common stock sold by certain stockholders of VHC. As a result ofrestructuring transactions (the “Restructuring Transactions”) through which Kellwood Holding, LLC acquired the IPO, VHC received net proceeds of $177 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated offering expenses. The Company retained approximately $5 million of such proceeds for general corporate purposes and used the remaining net proceeds, together with net borrowings under its new term loan facility to repay a promissory note (the “Kellwood Note Receivable”) issued tonon-Vince businesses, which included Kellwood Company, LLC (“Kellwood Company” or “Kellwood”) in connection, from the Company. The Company continues to own and operate the Vince business, which includes Vince, LLC.

On November 18, 2016, Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Company, LLC entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement with Sino Acquisition, LLC (the “Kellwood Purchaser”) whereby the Restructuring Transactions (as defined herein) which occurred immediately priorKellwood Purchaser agreed to purchase all of the outstanding equity interests of Kellwood Company, LLC. Prior to the consummation of the IPO. Proceeds from the repayment of theclosing, Kellwood Note Receivable were usedIntermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Company, LLC conducted a pre-closing reorganization pursuant to repay or dischargewhich certain existing debtassets of Kellwood Company.Company, LLC were distributed to a newly formed subsidiary of Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC, St. Louis Transition, LLC (“St. Louis, LLC”). The transaction closed on December 21, 2016 (the “Kellwood Sale”). St. Louis, LLC is anticipated to be wound down by or around December 2017.

Prior to the IPO and the Restructuring Transactions, VHC was a diversified apparel company operating a broad portfolio of fashion brands, which included the Vince business. As a result of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the non-Vince businesses were separated from the Vince business, and the stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions (the “Pre-IPO Stockholders”) (through their ownership of Kellwood Holding, LLC) retained the full ownership and control of the non-Vince businesses. The Vince business is now the sole operating business of Vince Holding Corp., with the Pre-IPO stockholders retaining approximately a 68% ownership. Historical financial information for the non-Vince businesses has been presented as a component of discontinued operations, until the businesses were separated on November 27, 2013, in this annual report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included herein.

DISCLOSURES REGARDING FORWARD LOOKINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, and any statements incorporated by reference herein, contains forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. SuchForward-looking statements often includeare indicated by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “target,” “project,” “forecast,” “envision” and other similar phrases. Although we believe the assumptions and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these assumptions and expectations may not prove to be correct and we may not achieve the financial results or benefits anticipated. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of actual results. Ourresults, and our actual results may differ materially from those suggested in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including, without limitation: our ability to maintain adequate cash flow from operations or availability under our revolving credit facility to meet our liquidity needs (including our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders); our ability to continue as a going concern; our ability to successfully operate the newly implemented systems, processes and functions recently transitioned from Kellwood Company; our ability to remediate the identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting; our ability to ensure the proper operation of the distribution facility by a third-party logistics provider recently transitioned from Kellwood; our ability to remain competitive in the areas of merchandise quality, price, breadth of selection and customer service; our ability to anticipate and/or react to changes in customer demand and attract new customers;customers, including in connection with making inventory commitments; our ability to control the level of sales in the off-price channels; our ability to manage excess inventory in a way that will promote the long-term health of the brand; changes in consumer confidence and spending; our ability to maintain projected profit margins; unusual, unpredictable and/or severe weather conditions; the execution and management of our retail store growth plans, including the availability and cost of acceptable real estate locations for new store openings; the execution and management of our international expansion, including our ability to promote our brand and merchandise outside the U.S. and find suitable partners in certain geographies,geographies; our ability to expand our product offerings into new product categories, including the ability to find suitable licensing partners; our ability to successfully implement our marketing initiatives; our ability to protect our trademarks in the U.S. and internationally; our ability to maintain the security of electronic and other confidential information; serious disruptions and catastrophic events; changes in global economies and credit and financial markets; competition; our ability to attract and retain key personnel; commodity, raw material and other cost increases; compliance with domestic and international laws, regulations and orders; changes in laws and regulations; outcomes of litigation and proceedings and the availability of insurance, indemnification and other third-party coverage of any losses suffered in connection therewith; tax mattersmatters; and other factors as set forth from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including those described in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A—Risk Factors.” We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only as of the time of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K and do not undertake to update or revise them as more information becomes available.

available, except as required by law.

3


PartPART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

For purposes of sectionthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Vince,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” refer to Vince Holding.Holding Corp. (“VHC”) and ourits wholly owned subsidiaries, including Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC and Vince, LLC. References to “Kellwood” refer, as applicable, to Kellwood Holding, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries (including Kellwood Company, LLC) or the operations of the non-Vince businesses after giving effect to the Restructuring Transactions.Transactions and prior to the Kellwood Sale.

Overview

Established in 2002, Vince is a prominent, high-growth contemporary fashionglobal luxury brand best known for utilizing luxe fabrications and innovative techniques to create a product assortment that combines urban utility and modern effortless stylestyle. From its edited core collection of ultra-soft cashmere knits and everyday luxury essentials. Founded in 2002,cotton tees, Vince has generated strong sales momentum over the last decade. We believe that we will achieve continued success by expanding our product assortmentevolved into a global lifestyle brand and destination for both women’s and men’s apparel and accessories. Vince products are sold in prestige distribution through premier wholesale partners in the U.S. and select international markets, as well as in our own branded retailworldwide, including approximately 2,300 distribution locations and on our e-commerce platform.across more than 40 countries. We have a small number of wholesale partners who account for a significant portion of our net sales. Net sales to the full-price, off-price and e-commerce operations of our fourthree largest wholesale partners were 53%45%, 43% and 49% of our total revenue for fiscal 20132016, fiscal 2015 and 55% of our total revenue for fiscal 2012. Of these2014, respectively. These partners each ofinclude Nordstrom, Saks Fifth AvenueInc., Hudson’s Bay Company and Neiman Marcus accountedGroup LTD, each accounting for more than 10% of our total revenue for fiscal 20132016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2012.2014. We design our products in the U.S. and source the vast majority of our products from contract manufacturers outside the U.S., primarily in Asia and South America.Asia.

We serve our customers through a variety of channels that reinforce the Vince brand image. Our diversified channel strategy allows us to introduce our products to customers through multiple distribution points that are reported in two segments: wholesale and direct-to-consumer. Our wholesale segment is comprised of sales to premiermajor department stores and specialty stores in the U.S. and in select international markets, with U.S. wholesale representing 71%51%, 56% and 67% of our fiscal 2013 sales. We believe that2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 net sales, respectively, and the total wholesale segment representing 63%, 67% and 76% of our successsales in for the U.S.same periods. International wholesale channelrepresented 10%, 10% and our strong relationships with premier wholesale partners provide opportunities for continued growth. These growth initiatives include creating enhanced product assortments and brand extensions through both in-house development activities and licensing arrangements, as well as continuing the build-out of branded shop-in-shops in select wholesale partner locations. We also believe international wholesale, which represented 8%9% of net sales for fiscal 2013, presents a significant growth opportunity as2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Our wholesale segment also includes our licensing business related to our licensing arrangement for our women’s and men’s footwear.

Our direct-to-consumer segment includes our company-operated retail and outlet stores and our e-commerce business. During fiscal 2016, we strengthen our presence in existing geographies and introduce Vince inopened six new markets globally.

In 2008, we initiated a direct-to-consumer strategy with the opening of our firstfull-price retail store.stores. As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we operated 2854 stores, which consistconsisting of 2240 company-operated full-price retail stores and six14 company-operated outlet locations. Based on a combination of third-party analyses and internal projections, we believe that the U.S. market can currently support at least 100 free-standing Vince store locations. The direct-to-consumer segment also includes our e-commerce website,www.vince.com, which was launched in 2008.. The direct-to-consumer segment accounted for 21%37%, 33% and 24% of fiscal 20132016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 net sales, and we expect sales from this channel to grow as we drive productivity in existing stores, open new stores and upgrade and re-launch our website in 2014.respectively.

Vince operates on a fiscal calendar widely used by the retail industry that results in a given fiscal year consisting of a 52 or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31 of the following year.

31.

References to “fiscal year 2013”2016” or “fiscal 2013” refer to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014;

References to “fiscal year 2012” or “fiscal 2012” refer to the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013; and

References to “fiscal year 2011” or “fiscal 2011”2016” refer to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2017;

References to “fiscal year 2015” or “fiscal 2015” refer to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016; and

References to “fiscal year 2014” or “fiscal 2014” refer to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.

Each of fiscal years 20132016, 2015 and 20112014 consisted of a 52-week period and fiscal year 2012 consisted of a53-weekperiod.

Vince Holding Corp., previously named Apparel Holding Corp., was incorporated in Delaware in February 2008 in connection with the acquisition of Kellwood Company by affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. (“Sun Capital”). In September 2012, Kellwood Company formed Vince, LLC and all assets constituting the Vince business were contributed to Vince, LLC at such time (the “Vince Transfer”). On November 27, 2013, Apparel Holding Corp. was renamed Vince Holding Corp. in connection with the consummation of an IPO. Certain restructuring transactions were completed in connection with the consummation of the IPO. These transactions, among other things, included Kellwood Holding, LLC acquiring the non-Vince businesses, which include Kellwood Company, LLC, from the Company. The Company has since owned and operated the Vince business, which includes Vince, LLC. The restructuring transactions separated the Vince and non-Vince businesses on November 27, 2013. Our principal executive office is located at 1441 Broadway, 6th500 5th Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 1001810110 and our telephone number is (212) 515-2600. Our corporate website address iswww.vince.com.

Initial Public Offering and Restructuring Transactions

On November 27, 2013 there was a series of transactions completed in connection with the consummation of the IPO. The following is a brief summary:

Initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of VHC common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share. In connection with the IPO the underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase an additional 1,500,000 shares of VHC common stock from affiliates of Sun Capital. Shares of the Company’s common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “VNCE”.

Certain restructuring transactions (“Restructuring Transactions”) were completed, through which:

(i)Kellwood Holding, LLC acquired the non-Vince businesses, which include Kellwood Company, LLC, from the Company; and

(ii)the Company continues to own and operate the Vince business, which includes Vince, LLC.

The above Restructuring Transactions separated the Vince and non-Vince businesses on November 27, 2013. Any and all debt obligations outstanding at the time of the Restructuring Transactions either remained with Kellwood Holding, LLC and its subsidiaries (i.e. the non-Vince businesses) and/or were discharged, repurchased or refinanced in connection with the consummation of the IPO. Historical financial information for the non-Vince businesses has been presented as a component of discontinued operations, until the businesses were separated on November 27, 2013 in this annual report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included herein.

Revolving Credit Facility—Vince, LLC entered into a new senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) serves as administrative agent under this new facility. This revolving credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $50 million. See “Revolving Credit Facility” under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Term Loan Facility—Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC entered into a new $175 million senior secured term loan credit facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) with the lenders party thereto, BofA, as administrative agent, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers. See “Term Loan Facility” under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Shared Services Agreement—Vince, LLC entered into a shared services agreement with Kellwood Company, LLC on November 27, 2013 (the “Shared Services Agreement”) pursuant to which Kellwood Company, LLC provides support services to Vince, LLC in various operational areas including, among other things, distribution, logistics, information technology, accounts payable, credit and collections, and payroll and benefits. See “Shared Services Agreement” under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in this annual report on Form10-K.

Tax Receivable Agreement—The Company entered into a tax receivable agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders on November 27, 2013 (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”). The Tax Receivable Agreement provides for payments to the Pre-IPO Stockholders in an amount equal to 85% of the aggregate reduction in taxes payable realized by the Company and its subsidiaries from the utilization of certain tax benefits

(including net operating losses and tax credits generated prior to the IPO and certain section 197 intangible deductions). See “Tax Receivable Agreement” under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Brand and Products

Established in 2002, Vince is a prominent, high-growth contemporary fashionglobal luxury brand best known for itsutilizing luxe fabrications and innovative techniques to create a product assortment that combines urban utility and modern effortless style and everyday luxury essentials. The Vince brand was founded in 2002 with astyle. From its edited core collection of stylish women’sultra-soft cashmere knits and cashmere sweaters that rapidly attracted a loyal customer base drawn to the casual sophistication and luxurious feel of our products. Over the last decade,cotton tees, Vince has generated strong sales momentumevolved into a global lifestyle brand and has successfully grown to include adestination for both women’s and men’s collection in 2007, denim, leather apparel

4


and outerwear lines in 2010, and women’s footwear in 2012, which was launched through a licensing partnership. The Vince brand is synonymous with a clean, timeless aesthetic, sophisticated design and superior quality. We believe these attributes have generated strong customer loyalty and allowed us to hold a distinctive position among contemporary fashion brands. We also believe that we will achieve continued success by expanding our product assortment and distributing this expanded product assortment through our premier wholesale partners in the U.S. and select international markets, as well as through our growing number of branded retail locations and on our e-commerce platform.

Since our inception in 2002, we have offered contemporary apparel with a focus on clean and authentic design and superior quality.accessories. We believe that our differentiated design aesthetic and strong attention to detail and fit allow us to maintain premium pricing, and that the combination of quality and value positions Vince as an everyday luxury brand that encourages repeat purchases among our customers. We also believe that we can expand our product assortment and distribute this expanded product assortment through our premier wholesale partners in the U.S. and select international markets, as well as through our branded retail locations and on our e-commerce platform.

Over 85% of Vince’s net sales were comprised of women’s products with particular strength in sweaters and knit tops in fiscal 2013. Our women’s linecollection includes seasonal collections of luxurious cashmere sweaters and silk blouses, leather and suede leggings and jackets, dresses, denim, pants, tanks and t-shirts, footwear and a growing assortment of outerwear. Our men’s collection includes t-shirts, knit and woven tops, sweaters, denim, pants, blazers, footwear, outerwear and stylish leather jackets.

We have identified additional brand extension opportunities, including elevating our men’s collection, expanding outerwear, women’s pants and dresses, and implementing a replenishment program for core items. In additioncontinue to apparel, we currently offer women’s footwear through a licensing arrangement and are preparing to launch men’s footwear in 2014 with the same licensing partner. We also anticipate launching children’s apparel in 2014 through a licensing partner. We are also evaluatingevaluate other brand extension opportunities through both in-house development activities andas well as through potential partnerships or licensing arrangements with third parties.

Design and Merchandising

Our product design and merchandising effortsWe are led by our President and Chief Creative Officer and a team of designers and merchandisers. Our design team is focused on developing an elevated collection of Vince apparel and accessories that buildbuilds upon the brand’s product heritage of modern, effortless style and everyday luxury essentials. The current design vision is to create a cohesive and compelling lifestyle product assortment with sophisticated head-to-toe looks for multiple wear occasions. During fiscal 2016, our product, merchandising and creative efforts were overseen by our co-founders as consultants, whose consultancy subsequently ended in February 2017. Our design efforts are supported by well-established product development and production teams and processes that allowenable us to bring new products to market quickly. We are looking to further build our merchant capabilities and believe continued collaboration between design and merchandising will ensure we respond to consumer preferences and market trends with new innovative product offerings while maintaining our core fashion foundation.

Business Segments

We serve our customers through a variety of channels that reinforce the Vince brand image. Our diversified channel strategy allows us to introduce our products to customers through multiple distribution points that are reported in two segments: wholesale and direct-to-consumer.

 

  Net Sales by Segment 

 

Fiscal Year

 

  Fiscal Year 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

(in thousands)  2013   2012(a)   2011 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

  $229,114    $203,107    $151,921  

 

$

170,053

 

 

$

201,182

 

 

$

259,418

 

Direct-to-consumer

   59,056     37,245     23,334  

 

 

98,146

 

 

 

101,275

 

 

 

80,978

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $288,170    $240,352    $175,255  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

 

$

268,199

 

 

$

302,457

 

 

$

340,396

 

 

(a)Note that Fiscal 2012 contained 53 weeks. The additional week contributed approximately $17.6 million and $0.9 million of net sales to the wholesale and direct-to-consumer segments, respectively.

Wholesale Segment

Our wholesale segment is comprised of sales to premiermajor department stores and specialty stores in the U.S. and in select international markets, with U.S. wholesale representing 71%51%, 56% and 67% of net sales in fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively and international wholesale representing 8%10%, 10% and 9% of our net sales for fiscal 2013.the same periods. Our products are currently sold in more than 40 countries. As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, our products were sold to consumers through 2,300at 2,260 doors through our wholesale partners. We had 11This includes shop-in-shops, which are operated by our domestic and international wholesale partners, where we sell the merchandise to the partners on a wholesale basis and recognize revenue when goods are shipped in accordance with customer orders. The shop-in-shops are dedicated spaces within the selling floors of select domestic and international wholesale partners where Vince product is prominently displayed and sold. Vince generally provides the shop-in-shop fixtures needed to build out the spaces within the department stores operated by our wholesale partners. As of January 28, 2017, there were 55 shop-in-shops consisting of 36 shop-in-shops with our U.S. wholesale partners and 1019 shop-in-shops with our international shop-in-shops. Our productswholesale partners. We also have four international free-standing stores which are currently sold in 47 countries,owned and we have one international free standing store in Tokyo, Japan that is operated by one of ourlocal license and distribution partners.partners whereby Vince provides the merchandise to the distribution partner for sale in the free-standing store which solely sells Vince product. Our wholesale segment also includes licensing. We signed our first licensing agreementbusiness related to our licensing arrangement for our women’s and men’s footwear in fiscal 2012. Our footwear isline. The licensed products are sold in our own stores and by our licensee to select wholesale partners, and wepartners. We earn a royalty based on net sales through ourto the wholesale partners.

Direct-to-Consumer Segment

In 2008, we initiated aOur direct-to-consumer strategy with the opening ofsegment includes our firstcompany-operated retail store.and outlet stores and our e-commerce business. As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we operated 2854 stores, which consistconsisted of 2240 company-operated full-price retail stores and six14 company-operated outlet locations. The direct-to-consumer segment also includes our e-commerce website,www.vince.com, which was launched in 2008.. The direct-to-consumer segment accounted for approximately 21%37%, 33% and 24% of fiscal 20132016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 net sales, and we expect sales from this channel to grow as we drive productivity in existing stores, open new stores and upgrade and re-launch our website in 2014.respectively.

5


The following table details the number of retail stores we operated for the past three fiscal years:

 

Fiscal Year

 

  Fiscal 2013 Fiscal 2012   Fiscal 2011 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Beginning of fiscal year

   22   19     16  

 

48

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

28

 

Opened

   7   3     3  

 

6

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

9

 

Closed

   (1  —       —    
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

End of fiscal year

   28    22     19  

 

54

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

37

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Marketing, Advertising and Public Relations

We use marketing, advertising and public relations as critical tools to deliver a consistent and compelling brand message.message to consumers. Our brand message and marketing is focused on showcasing our product and sophisticated style, as well as building an emotional connection with the customer. The Vince brand image is developed andstrategies are cultivated by dedicated creative, design, marketing, visual merchandising and public relations teams. These teams that, along with the Vince design team and select outside agencies, work closely together to ensure consistency of the brand message across various consumer touchpoints.

develop and execute campaigns that appeal to both our core and aspirational customers.

WeTo execute our marketing strategies, we engage in a wide range of direct marketing programscampaign tactics that include traditional media (direct(such as direct mail, print advertising, cooperative advertising with wholesale partners and outdoor advertising), digital media (email, web)(such as email, search and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagramdisplay) and Pinterest)experiential campaigns (such as events and collection previews) to drive traffic, brand awareness, conversion and ultimately sales across all channels. We believe our customers will continue to be receptive to our marketing and social media efforts, which, in management’s opinion, have presented us with a strong new marketing channel to reach existing and prospective customers. We use Facebook as the main social media hub to generate conversation about the brand through daily lifestyle posts, focusing on product launches, style tips and in-store events. Social media platforms like Instagram allow us to tell our brand story creatively by offering behind-the-scenes access to events, press reviews and the Vince showroom, as well as featuring Vince enthusiasts wearing our products. In addition, the growing number ofwe use social platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest to engage customers and create excitement about our brand. The visits towww.vince.com, which totaled 2.6approximately 5.4 million in fiscal 2013, representing a 50% increase from fiscal 2012, provides2016, also provide an opportunity to grow our customer base and communicate directly with our customers.

Our public relations team conducts a wide variety of press activities to reinforce the Vince brand image and create excitement around the brand. Vince apparel and footwear have appeared in the pages of major fashion magazines such asVogue, Harper’s Bazaar, Elle, W, GQ, Esquire andVanity FairWSJ. Well-known trend-setterstrend setters in entertainment and fashion are also regularly seen wearing the Vince brand.

Sourcing and Manufacturing

Vince does not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. We contract for the purchase of finished goods with manufacturers who are responsible for the entire manufacturing process, including the purchase of piece goods and trim. Although we do not have long-term written contracts with manufacturers, we have long-standing relationships with a diverse base of vendors which we believe to be mutually satisfactory. We work with over 3040 manufacturers across five countries, with 86%92% of our products produced in China in fiscal 2013.2016. For cost and control purposes, we contract with select third-party vendors in the U.S. to produce a small portion of our merchandise that includes woven pants and products manufactured with man-made fibers.

All of our garments are produced according to our specifications, and we require that all of our manufacturers adhere to strict regulatory compliance and standards of conduct. Our vendors’ factories are monitored by our production team to ensure quality control, and they are monitored by independent third-party inspectors we employ for compliance with local manufacturing standards and regulations on an annual basis. Our quality assurance staff in the U.S. and AsiaWe also monitorsmonitor our vendors’ manufacturing facilities regularly, providing technical assistance and performing in-line and final audits to ensure the highest possible quality.

Distribution FacilitiesShared Services Agreement

PursuantIn connection with the consummation of the IPO, Vince, LLC entered into a Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood Company, LLC on November 27, 2013 (the “Shared Services Agreement”) pursuant to which Kellwood would provide support services in various areas including, among other things, certain accounting functions, tax, e-commerce operations, distribution, logistics, information technology, accounts payable, credit and collections and payroll and benefits administration. Since the IPO, we had been in the process of transitioning certain functions performed by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement Kellwood provides distribution facilities and services in the U.S. These services include distribution, storage and fulfillment. Kellwood will continue to provide these services until such time as we elect to terminate the provision of such services in accordance with the terms of the Shared Services Agreement.end of fiscal 2016, we have completed the transition of all such functions and systems from Kellwood to our own systems or processes as well as to third-party service providers. Refer to the discussion under “Information Systems” below for further information on our transition of information technology systems and infrastructure in-house from Kellwood. See also “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We have completed the transition of certain services, which had been provided to us by Kellwood since our initial public offering, to our own systems or processes as well as external resources. If the newly implemented systems, processes and functions do not operate successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially harmed.” In addition, see “Shared Services Agreement” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” ofNote 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regardingfurther information.

In connection with the Kellwood Sale, the Shared Services Agreement.Agreement was contributed to St. Louis, LLC. St. Louis, LLC continues to provide minor transitional services relating to historical records and legacy functions, which we are in the process of

6


winding down. The Shared Services Agreement will terminate automatically upon the termination of all services provided thereunder. After termination of the agreement, St. Louis, LLC will have no obligation to provide any services to us.

Distribution Facilities

As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we operated out of threetwo distribution centers, twoone located in the U.S. and one in Belgium. TheIn the U.S., we historically relied on a distribution facility operated by Kellwood in City of Industry, California as part of the Shared Services Agreement. In November 2015, we entered into a service agreement with a new third-party distribution provider in California and we completed the migration of the distribution facility from Kellwood in 2016. This primary warehouse, operated by the third-party distribution provider is located in City of Industry, California, and includes 75,000approximately 115,000 square feet dedicated to fulfilling orders for our wholesale partners, and retail locations. An adjacent warehouse spanning 22,000 square feet supports Vince’slocations and e-commerce business and offers additional capacity to support our projected growth over the next several years. Our space in both of the California warehouses utilize state-of-the-artutilizes warehouse management systems that are fully customer and vendor compliant and are completely integrated with our ERP (enterprise resource planning) and accounting systems.compliant.

The warehouse in Belgium is operated by a third-party logistics provider and supports our wholesale orders for customers located primarily in Europe. The warehouse management systems of the Belgium warehouse are integrated

with our ERP systems to provide us with near real-time visibility into our international distribution. We believe we have sufficient capacity in our domestic and international distribution facilities to support our continued growth.current and projected business.

Information Systems

Kellwood will continue to provideOur enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system is Microsoft Dynamics AX and is cloud based and integrates with our point-of-sale (“POS”) system, e-commerce platform and other supporting systems.

Collectively, these systems replaced all systems used under the Shared Services Agreement. Since the IPO, we relied on certain systems and information technology services to us until such time as we elect to terminate provision of such services in accordance withKellwood pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. These services includehistorically included information technology planning and administration, desktop support and help desk, our ERP system, financial applications, warehouse systems, reporting and analysis applications and our retail and e-commerce interfaces.

OurSince the IPO, we had been working on transitioning these systems and information technology services from Kellwood and as of the end of fiscal 2016, we have completed the transition of all such systems from Kellwood to our own systems. This included the implementation of our own ERP and supporting systems, POS system, was developed from a core system that is widely usedthird-party e-commerce platform, distribution applications, network infrastructure and related IT support services, and human resource payroll and recruitment systems. We no longer rely on Kellwood’s information technology services except for certain minor transitional services relating to historical records and legacy functions.

See “Shared Services Agreement,” above, Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We have completed the transition of certain services, which had been provided to us by Kellwood since our initial public offering, to our own systems or processes as well as external resources. If the newly implemented systems, processes and functions do not operate successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially harmed.” and Part II, Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.” In addition, see “Shared Services Agreement” under Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in thethis Annual Report on form 10-K for further information.

Seasonality

The apparel and fashion industry, which we have customized to suit our inventory management and order processing requirements. We have integrated Oracle Financials with our ERP system to meet our financial reporting and accounting requirements. Additionally, we use a suite of third-party hosted retail applications integrated with our ERP system that provide us with merchandising, retail inventory management, point-of-sale systems, customer relationship management and retail accounting. Our retail applications are supported through a “Software as a Service” model, which allows for new implementations to occur quickly. Our ERP and warehouse management systems are also integrated with a hosted, third-party e-commerce platform.

Seasonality

The industry in which we operate is cyclical and, consequently, our revenues are affected by general economic conditions and the seasonal trends characteristic to the apparel and fashion industry. Purchases of apparel are sensitive to a number of factors that influence the level of consumer spending, including economic conditions and the level of disposable consumer income, consumer debt, interest rates, and consumer confidence.confidence as well as the impact from adverse weather conditions. In addition, fluctuations in sales in any fiscal quarter are affected by the timing of seasonal wholesale shipments and other events affecting direct-to-consumer sales; as such, the financial results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of results for the fiscal year.

Competition

We face strong competition in each of the product categories and markets wherein which we compete on the basis of style, quality, price and brand recognition. Some of our competitors have achieved significant recognition for their brand names or have substantially greater financial, marketing, distribution and other resources thancompared to us. However, we believe that we have established a sustainable advantage and distinct position in the current marketplace, driven by a product assortment that combines classic and fashion-forward styling, and a pricing strategy that offers customers affordableaccessible luxury. Our competitors are varied, but include Theory, Helmut Lang, Rag & Bone, James Perse, J. Crew, Michael Kors, Diane von FurstenbergJoie, and Tory Burch.J Brand, among others.

7


Employees

As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we had 355597 employees, of which 213355 were employed in our company-operated retail stores. NoneExcept for six employees in France, who are covered by collective bargaining agreements pursuant to French law, none of our employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe our employee relations are good.

Trademarks and Licensing

We own theVincetrademark for the production, marketing and distribution of our products in the U.S. and internationally. We have registered the trademark domestically and have registrations on file or pending in a number of foreign jurisdictions. We intend to continue to strategically register, both domestically and internationally, trademarks that we use today and those we develop in the future. We license the domain name for

our website,www.vince.com, pursuant to a license agreement. Under this license agreement, we have an exclusive, irrevocable license to use thewww.vince.com domain name without restriction at a nominal annual cost. While we may terminate such license agreement at our discretion, the agreement does not provide for termination by the licensor. We also own unregistered copyright rights in our design marks.

Available Information

We make available free of charge on our Internet website, www.vince.com, copies of our annual reportsAnnual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements and all amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically with, or otherwise furnishing it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy these materials at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Vince and other companies that electronically file materials with the SEC. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website, and the information contained on the website is not part of this annual reportAnnual Report onForm 10-K.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

RISK FACTORS.

The following risk factors should be carefully considered when evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements in this annual reportAnnual Report onForm 10-K. See “Disclosures Regarding Forward LookingForward-Looking Statements.” All amounts disclosed are in thousands except shares, per share amounts, percentages, stores and number of leases.

Risks Related to Our Business

General economic conditions inOur ability to continue to have the U.S.liquidity necessary to service our debt, meet contractual payment obligations, including under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and other parts of the world, including a continued weakening of the economy and restricted credit markets, can affect consumer confidence and consumer spending patterns.

The apparel industry has historically been subject to cyclical variations, recessions in the general economy or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects that affect consumer spending habits which could negatively impact our business overall, the carrying value of our tangible and intangible assets and specifically sales, gross margins and profitability. The success offund our operations depends on consumer spending. Consumer spending ismany factors, including our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, maintain adequate availability under our Revolving Credit Facility or obtain other financing.

Our ability to timely service our indebtedness, meet contractual payment obligations and to fund our operations will depend on our ability to generate sufficient cash, either through cash flows from operations, borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility or other financing. Our recent financial results have been, and our future financial results are expected to be, subject to substantial fluctuations impacted by a number of factors, including actual and perceived economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income (such as unemployment, wages, energy costs and consumer debt levels), business conditions and macroeconomic factors.

In April 2016, the Company completed a rights offering (the “Rights Offering”) whereby the Company received subscriptions and over-subscriptions from its existing stockholders for a total of 11,622,518 shares of its common stock, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of $63,924. Simultaneous with the closing of the Rights Offering, the Company received $1,076 of gross proceeds from the related backstop investment by Sun Cardinal, LLC and SCSF Cardinal, LLC (the “Sun Investors”) and issued to the Sun Investors 195,663 shares of its common stock pursuant to the related Investment Agreement. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds received from the Rights Offering and related Investment Agreement to (1) repay the amount owed by the Company under the Tax Receivable Agreement for the tax benefit with respect to the 2014 taxable year including accrued interest, ratestotaling $22,262 (see Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details), and (2) repay all then outstanding indebtedness, totaling $20,000, under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds, which funds are to be held by Vince Holding Corp. until needed by its operating subsidiary, for additional strategic investments and general corporate purposes, which may include future amounts owed by the Company under the Tax Receivable Agreement. During April 2017, the Company utilized $6,241 of the funds held by Vince Holding Corp. to make a Specified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Term Loan Facility, in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan as of January 28, 2017 so that the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio would not

8


exceed 3.25 to 1.00. Vince Holding Corp. had $15,196 of funds remaining on April 28, 2017. In fiscal 2017, the Company also anticipates making an additional Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan as of April 29, 2017.

Additionally, in order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into a side letter (the “Letter”) with Bank of creditAmerica (“BofA”), as administrative agent and tax ratescollateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility which temporarily modified the covenant that requires that at any point when “Excess Availability” is less than the greater of (i) 15% of the adjusted loan cap (without giving effect to item (iii) of the loan cap described in Note 4 “Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) or (ii) $10,000, and continuing until Excess Availability exceeds the greater of such amounts for 30 consecutive days, during which time, we must maintain a consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the general economyRevolving Credit Facility) equal to or greater than $20,000 measured at the end of each applicable fiscal month for the trailing twelve-month period. The Letter provided that during the period from March 6, 2017 until and through April 30, 2017, the respective thresholds included in the international, regionaldefinitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and local markets“Trigger Event” under the Revolving Credit Facility were temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined under the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. On April 14, 2017, Vince, LLC and BofA amended and restated the Letter in which our products are sold.

Recent global economic conditions haveits entirety (the “Amended Letter”). The Amended Letter provides that during the period from April 13, 2017 until and through July 31, 2017 (the “Letter Period”), the respective thresholds included significant recessionary pressuresin the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and declines“Trigger Event” in employment levels, disposable incomethe Revolving Credit Facility continue to be temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) and actual and/or perceived wealth and(b) $5,000. The Amended Letter further declines in consumer confidence and economic growth. These conditions have led and could lead to continued declines in consumer spending overprovides that during the foreseeable future and may have resultedLetter Period, so long as the Company’s cash is held in a shift in consumer spending habits that makes it unlikely that spending will return to prior levels fordeposit account of the foreseeable future. The current depressed economic environment has been characterized by a decline in consumer discretionary spending and has disproportionately affected retailers and sellers of consumer goods, particularly those whose goods are viewed as discretionary or luxury purchases, including fashion apparel such as ours. While we have seen occasional signs of stabilizationCompany maintained with BofA (the “BofA Account”), the Company may include in the North American markets during 2012Borrowing Base (i) up to $10,000 of such cash after April 13, 2017 through May 31, 2017 and 2013, a shift towards continued recessionary conditions could adversely impact our sales volumes(ii) up to $5,000 of such cash after May 31, 2017 through July 31, 2017. During the Letter Period, to the extent that the cash and overall profitabilitycash equivalents held by the Loan Parties at the close of business on any given day exceeds $1,000 (excluding amounts in the future. Further, the European debt crisis resulting from growing concerns that European countries could default on their national debt has caused instabilityBofA Account and certain other excluded accounts, as well as amounts equal to all undrawn checks and ACH issued in the European economy, which is oneordinary course of business for payroll, rent and other accounts payable needs), Vince shall use any such cash in excess of $1,000 to repay the areasloans under the Revolving Credit Facility.

There can be no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our liquidity needs, that we will have the necessary availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, that the funds held by Vince Holding Corp. will be sufficient to support additional Specified Equity Contributions, or be able to obtain other financing when liquidity needs arise. In the event that we are currently targetingunable to timely service our debt service, meet other contractual payment obligations or fund our other liquidity needs, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity, seek waivers of or amendments to our contractual obligations for international expansion. Continued economic volatilitypayment, reduce or delay scheduled expansions and declinescapital expenditures or sell material assets or operations. Payment defaults under our debt agreements or other contracts could result in a default under the valueTerm Loan Facility or the Revolving Credit Facility, which could result in all amounts outstanding under those credit facilities becoming immediately due and payable. Additionally, the lenders under those credit facilities would not be obligated to lend us additional funds. See “In accordance with the new accounting guidance that became effective for fiscal 2016, our management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued” for additional details.

In accordance with the new accounting guidance that became effective for fiscal 2016, our management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

In accordance with the new accounting guidance that became effective for fiscal 2016, management has the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. As required by this standard, management’s evaluation does not initially consider the potential mitigating effects of management’s plans that have not been fully implemented as of the Eurodate the financial statements are issued. As further discussed in Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (D) Sources and Uses of Liquidity” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, understanding the difficulties to project the current retail environment and as management’s plans to mitigate the substantial doubt have not been fully executed, our management has concluded there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Our financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on the execution of our plans to mitigate the substantial doubt that currently exists, including discussions with existing and prospective lenders and with our majority shareholder on additional financing options and actions to improve the capital structure of the Company and cost containment initiatives. While management believes that these plans are reasonably possible of occurring, it cannot predict with certainty the impact of various factors, including a challenging retail environment, on the Company’s business operations and financial results. Such impact could give rise to unanticipated capital needs that we may not be able to meet and/or result in our inability to service our existing debt or comply with the covenants therein. If such an event occurs, if we are unsuccessful in securing

9


amendments to our existing debt agreements or other foreign currencies could negatively impactfinancing arrangement or otherwise improving our capital structure, we may be unable to meet our payment obligations as they become due and may be required to restructure our business. In addition, the global economyinclusion of our management’s conclusion described above may materially adversely affect the Company’s stock price and its relationships with its customers, vendors and other business partners.

Our operations are restricted by our credit facilities.

We entered into the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Facility, in each case as a whole. Such a conditionamended, in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions which closed on November 27, 2013. Our facilities contain significant restrictive covenants. These covenants may haveimpair our financing and operational flexibility and make it difficult for us to react to market conditions and satisfy our ongoing capital needs and unanticipated cash requirements. Specifically, such covenants will likely restrict our ability and, if applicable, the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

incur additional debt;

make certain investments and acquisitions;

enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;

use assets as security in other transactions;

pay dividends;

sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies;

guarantee the debt of others;

enter into new lines of businesses;

make capital expenditures;

prepay, redeem or exchange our debt; and

form any joint ventures or subsidiary investments.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and other terms of our debt obligations will depend on our future operating performance. If we fail to comply with such covenants and terms, we would be required to obtain waivers from our lenders to maintain compliance with our debt obligations. If we are unable to obtain any necessary waivers and the debt is accelerated, a material adverse impacteffect on our financial condition and future operating performance would likely result. For further details, see Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (D) Sources and Uses of Liquidity” to the profitability and liquidityConsolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The terms of our international operations, as well as hinderdebt obligations and the amount of borrowing availability under our facilities may restrict or delay our ability to grow through expansionfulfill our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement, delayed or unpaid amounts thereunder would accrue interest at a default rate of one-year LIBOR plus 500 basis points until paid. Our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could result in a failure to comply with covenants or financial ratios required by our debt financing agreements and could result in an event of default under such a debt financing. See “Tax Receivable Agreement” under Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the international markets.Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

Economic conditionsIn connection with the completion of the Rights Offering and related Investment Agreement, the Company made the required payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement for its obligations related to taxable year 2014. (See full discussion in – “Our ability to continue to have also ledthe liquidity necessary to service our debt, meet contractual payment obligations, including under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and fund our operations depends on many factors, including our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, maintain adequate availability under our Revolving Credit Facility or obtain other financing.”)  In addition, the Company made a highly promotional environment and strong discounting pressure from both our wholesale partners and retail customers, which have had a negative impact on our revenues and

profitability. This promotional environment may continue even after economic growth returns, as we expect consumer spending trends are likely to remain at historically depressed levelspayment of $7,438, including any accrued interest, for the foreseeable future. The domestic and international political situation also affects consumer confidence. The threat, outbreak or escalation of terrorism, military conflicts or other hostilities around the world could leadtax benefit related to further decreasestaxable year 2015 in consumer spending.November 2016.

Intense competition in the apparel and fashion industry could reduce our sales and profitability.

As a fashion company, we face intense competition from other domestic and foreign apparel, footwear and accessories manufacturers and retailers. Competition may result in pricing pressures, reduced profit margins, lost market share or failure to grow our market share, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations. Competition is based on many factors including, without limitation, the following:

establishing and maintaining favorable brand recognition;

developing products that appeal to consumers;

pricing products appropriately;

determining and maintaining product quality;

obtaining access to sufficient floor space in retail locations;

providing appropriate services and support to retailers;

maintaining and growing market share;

hiring and retaining key employees; and

protecting intellectual property.

10


Competition in the apparel and fashion industry is intense and is dominated by a number of very large brands, many of which have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, more established relationships with a broader set of suppliers, greater brand recognition and greater financial, research and development, marketing, distribution and other resources than we do. These capabilities of our competitors may allow them to better withstand downturns in the economy or apparel and fashion industry. Any increased competition, or our failure to adequately address any of these competitive factors which we have seen from time to time, could result in reduced sales, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Competition, along with such other factors as consolidation within the retail industry and changes in consumer spending patterns, could also result in significant pricing pressure. These factorspressure and cause the sales environment to be more promotional, as it has been in recent years, impacting our financial results. If promotional pressure remains intense, either through actions of our competitors or through customer expectations, this may cause a further reduction in our sales and gross margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results as we focus on full-price selling.

General economic conditions in the U.S. and other parts of the world, including a continued weakening of the economy and restricted credit markets, can affect consumer confidence and consumer spending patterns.

The success of our operations depends on consumer spending. Consumer spending is impacted by a number of factors, including actual and perceived economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income (such as unemployment, wages, energy costs and consumer debt levels), customer traffic within shopping and selling environments, business conditions, interest rates and availability of credit and tax rates in the general economy and in the international, regional and local markets in which our products are sold. Recent global economic conditions have included significant recessionary pressures and declines in employment levels, disposable income and actual and/or perceived wealth and further declines in consumer confidence and economic growth. The recent depressed economic environment was characterized by a decline in consumer discretionary spending and has disproportionately affected retailers and sellers of consumer goods, particularly those whose goods are viewed as discretionary or luxury purchases, including fashion apparel and accessories such as ours. Such factors as well as another shift towards recessionary conditions have impacted, and could further adversely impact, our sales volumes and overall profitability. Further, economic and political volatility and declines in the value of foreign currencies could negatively impact the global economy as a whole and have a material adverse effect on the profitability and liquidity of our operations, as well as hinder our ability to grow through expansion in the international markets. In addition, domestic and international political situations also affect consumer confidence, including the threat, outbreak or escalation of terrorism, military conflicts or other hostilities around the world.

We have completed the transition of certain services, which had been provided to us by Kellwood since our initial public offering, to our own systems or processes as well as external resources. If the newly implemented systems, processes and functions do not operate successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially harmed.

Since the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, we have relied on certain administrative and operational support functions and systems of Kellwood to run our business pursuant to a Shared Services Agreement (the “Shared Services Agreement”), dated November 27, 2013, by and between Kellwood and us. As of the end of fiscal 2016, we have completed the transition of all such functions and systems from Kellwood to our own systems or processes as well as external resources. See “Shared Services Agreement” under Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details. The new systems we have recently implemented have not initially operated as successfully as the systems we historically used as such systems were highly customized or proprietary and has resulted in disruptions to our business, such as delayed shipments which resulted in order cancellations, including identified material weaknesses in our internal controls. See “We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements” below. Any further failures of those systems could materially and adversely impact the Company’s operations, including its internal controls. Moreover, the processes and functions that were transitioned to our internal capabilities may not achieve the appropriate levels of operational efficiency in a timely manner, or at all, and the third-party service providers we engaged may be unable to effectively replace the functions historically provided by Kellwood in a manner that meets our business needs. In addition, our employees and outsource service providers may not be able to effectively utilize the new systems and employ the new processes in a timely manner, or at all. If we are unable to successfully operate these new systems, processes and functions, we may be forced to adopt more costly, less capable alternatives to replace those systems and functions and our business and results of operations, cash flows and liquidity may be materially and adversely affected.

The Shared Services Agreement has governed the provisions of certain support services to us, including distribution, information technology and back office support by Kellwood, as described above. In connection with the Kellwood Sale, the Shared Services Agreement was contributed to St. Louis, LLC. St. Louis, LLC continues to provide minor transitional services relating to historical records and legacy functions, which we are in the process of winding down. The Shared Services Agreement will terminate automatically upon the termination of all services provided thereunder. After termination of the agreement, St. Louis, LLC will have no obligation to provide any services to us.

11


We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

We have identified and concluded that we have material weaknesses relating to our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of an entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Refer to Part II, Item 9A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more details.

As further described in Part II, Item 9A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are taking specific steps to remediate the material weaknesses that we identified by implementing and enhancing our control procedures. These material weaknesses will not be remediated until all necessary internal controls have been implemented, tested and determined to be operating effectively. In addition, we may need to take additional measures to address the material weaknesses or modify the planned remediation steps, and we cannot be certain that the measures we have taken, and expect to take, to improve our internal controls will be sufficient to address the issues identified, to ensure that our internal controls are effective or to ensure that the identified material weaknesses will not result in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements. Moreover, other material weaknesses or deficiencies may develop or be identified in the future. If we are unable to correct material weaknesses or deficiencies in internal controls in a timely manner, our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, will be adversely affected. This failure could negatively affect the market price and trading liquidity of our common stock, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, subject us to reducecivil and criminal investigations and penalties, and generally materially and adversely impact our sales pricesbusiness and financial condition.

We recently completed the process of migrating our U.S. distribution system from Kellwood to a new third-party provider. Problems with our distribution system, including any disruption caused by the recent migration, could materially harm our ability to meet customer expectations, manage inventory, complete sale transactions and achieve targeted operating efficiencies.

In the U.S., we historically relied on a distribution facility operated by Kellwood in City of Industry, California as part of the Shared Services Agreement. In November 2015, we entered into a service agreement with a new third-party distribution provider in California and completed the migration of the distribution facility from Kellwood in 2016. Our ability to meet the needs of our wholesale partners and retail consumers,our own direct-to-consumer business depends on the proper operation of this distribution facility. The migration of these services from Kellwood required us to implement new system integrations. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter problems as a result of such transition to the new third-party provider, including significant chargebacks from our wholesale partners and delays in shipments of merchandise to our customers, which could causehave a material adverse effect on our gross marginsbusiness, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. We also have a warehouse in Belgium operated by a third-party logistics provider to decline ifsupport our wholesale orders for customers located primarily in Europe.

Because substantially all of our products are distributed from one location, our operations could also be interrupted by labor difficulties, or by floods, fires, earthquakes or other natural disasters near such facility. For example, a majority of our ocean shipments go through the ports in Los Angeles, which had previously been subject to significant processing delays due to labor issues involving the port workers. We maintain business interruption insurance. These policies, however, may not adequately protect us from the adverse effects that could result from significant disruptions to our distribution system, including those that may arise from the migration. If we are unableencounter problems with any of our distribution systems, our ability to appropriatelymeet customer expectations, manage inventory, levels and/or otherwise offset price reductions with comparable reductions in ourcomplete sales and achieve targeted operating costs. If our sales prices decline and we fail to sufficiently reduce our product costs or operating expenses, our profitability may decline, whichefficiencies could be harmed. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

System security risk issues as well as other major system failures could disrupt our internal operations or information technology services, and any such disruption could negatively impact our net sales, increase our expenses and harm our reputation.

Experienced computer programmers and hackers, and even internal users, may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information or that of third parties, including our customers, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. In addition, employee error, malfeasance or other errors in the storage, use or transmission of any such information could result in a disclosure to third parties outside of our network. As a result, we could incur significant expenses addressing problems created by any such inadvertent disclosure or any security breaches of our network. In addition, we rely on third parties for the operation of our website, www.vince.com, and for the various social media tools and websites we use as part of our marketing strategy.

Consumers are increasingly concerned over the security of personal information transmitted over the internet, consumer identity theft and user privacy, and any compromise of customer information could subject us to customer or government litigation and harm our reputation, which could adversely affect our business and growth. Moreover, we could incur significant expenses or disruptions of our operations in connection with system failures or breaches. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of our systems. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate security problems, viruses and bugs, or any problems associated with our newly transitioned systems or outsourced services could be significant, and the efforts to address these problems could result in interruptions, delays or cessation of service that may impede our sales, distribution or other

12


critical functions. In addition to taking the necessary precautions ourselves, we require that third-party service providers implement reasonable security measures to protect our customers’ identity and privacy as well as credit card information. We do not, however, control these third-party service providers and cannot guarantee that no electronic or physical computer break-ins and security breaches will occur in the future. We could also incur significant costs in complying with the multitude of state, federal and foreign laws regarding the use and unauthorized disclosure of personal information, to the extent they are applicable. In the case of a disaster affecting our information technology systems, we may experience delays in recovery of data, inability to perform vital corporate functions, tardiness in required reporting and compliance, failures to adequately support our operations and other breakdowns in normal communication and operating procedures that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Any disputes that arise between us and St. Louis, LLC with respect to any past or ongoing relationships under the Shared Services Agreement, or between us and Kellwood, which is now an unaffiliated entity, with respect to our past relationship, could materially harm our business operations.

Disputes may arise between St. Louis, LLC and us with respect to any past or ongoing transitional services provided under the Shared Services Agreement.  In addition, disputes may arise between us and Kellwood, which is now an unaffiliated entity as a result of the Kellwood Sale, in a number of areas relating to our past relationships, including intellectual property and technology matters; information retention, labor, tax, employee benefit, indemnification and other matters arising from our separation from Kellwood.

Any dispute relating to the Shared Services Agreement may not be addressed adequately as St. Louis, LLC is in the process of winding down its businesses.  In addition, we may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts with Kellwood and the resolution might be more difficult with an unaffiliated party due to, among other things, lack of historical knowledge and understanding of the nature of our past relationship with Kellwood.  Any such dispute, if not resolved, could materially harm our business operations.

Our business depends on a strong brand image, and if we are not able to maintain or enhance our brand, particularly in new markets where we have limited brand recognition, we may be unable to sell sufficient quantities of our merchandise, which would harm our business and cause our results of operations to suffer.

We believe that maintaining and enhancing the Vince brand is critical to maintaining and expanding our customer base. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments in areas such as visual merchandising (including working with our wholesale partners to transform select Vince displays into branded shop-in-shops), marketing and advertising, employee training and store operations. A primary component of our strategy involves expanding into other geographic markets and working with existing wholesale partners, particularly within the U.S. We anticipate that, as our business expands into new markets and

further penetrates existing markets, and as the markets in which we operate become increasingly competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brand may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Certain of our competitors in the apparelfashion industry have faced adverse publicity surrounding the quality, attributes and performance of their products. Our brand may similarly be adversely affected if our public image or reputation is tarnished by failing to maintain high standards for merchandise quality and integrity. Any negative publicity about these types of concerns may reduce demand for our merchandise. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to be a leader in the contemporary apparelfashion industry and to continue to provide high quality products. If we are unable to maintain or enhance our brand image, our results of operations may suffer and our business may be harmed.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from a small number of large wholesale partners, and the loss of any of these wholesale partners could substantially reduce our total revenue.

We have a small number of wholesale partners who account for a significant portion of our net sales. Net sales to the full-price, off-price and e-commerce operations of our fourthree largest wholesale partners were 53%45% of our total revenue for fiscal 2013. Of these top four2016. These partners there were three partners,include Nordstrom Sakes Fifth AvenueInc., Hudson’s Bay Company and Neiman Marcus that accountedGroup LTD, each accounting for more than 10% each of our total revenue for fiscal 2013, and such partners collectively represented approximately 46% of our total revenue in such period.2016. We do not have written agreements with any of our wholesale partners, and purchases generally occur on an order-by-order basis. A decision by any of our major wholesale partners, whether motivated by marketing strategy, competitive conditions, financial difficulties or otherwise, to significantly decrease the amount of merchandise purchased from us or our licensing partners, or to change their manner of doing business with us or our licensing partners, could substantially reduce our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our profitability. Furthermore, due to the concentration of our wholesale partner base, our results of operations could be adversely affected if any of these wholesale partners failfails to satisfy its payment obligations to us when due. During the past several years, the retail industry has experienced a great deal of ownership change, and we expect such change will continue. For example, Saks Fifth Avenue, one of our top four partners, was recently acquired by Hudson Bay Corporation. We cannot guarantee that our relationship with Saks Fifth Avenue will not be impacted by this ownership change and any strategic changes Saks Fifth Avenue may implement as a result. In addition, store closings by our wholesale partners decrease the number of stores carrying our products, while the remaining stores may purchase a smaller amount of our products and may reduce the retail floor space designated for our brand. In the future, retailers may further consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, realign their affiliations or reposition their stores’ target markets. Any of these types of actions could decrease the number of stores that carry our products or increase the ownership concentration within the retail industry. These changes could decrease our opportunities in the market, increase our reliance on a

13


diminishing number of large wholesale partners and decrease our negotiating strength with our wholesale partners. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may not be able to successfully expand our wholesale partnership base or grow our presence with existing wholesale partners.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to increase productivity and penetration with existing wholesale partners and form relationships with new, international wholesale partners. These initiatives may include the expansion of floor space with existing partners or new partners through the growth of offerings in new or under-developed product categories, such as handbags, lifestyle products and men’s apparel, as well as the establishment of additional shop-in-shops within select department stores. The location of Vince displays or shop-in-shops within department stores is controlled in large part by our wholesale partners. Although the investments made by us and our wholesale partners in the development and installation of Vince displays and shop-in-shops decreases the risk that our wholesale partners will require us to move to a less desirable area of their store or reduce the space allocated to such displays and shops, they are not contractually prohibited from doing so or required to grant additional or more desirable space to us. As of February 1, 2014, we had 11 shop-in-shops withWhile increasing productivity and penetration within our U.S. wholesale partners and 10 shop-in-shops with our international wholesale partners. While expanding the number of shop-in-shops is part of our growth strategy, there can be no assurances we will be able to align our wholesale partners with this strategy and continue to receive floor space from our wholesale partners to open or expand shop-in-shops.

Our ability to attract customers to our stores depends heavily on successfully locating our stores in suitable locations and any impairment of a store location, including any decrease in customer traffic, could cause our sales to be less than expected.

Our approach to identifying locations for our retail stores typically favors street and mall locations near luxury and contemporary retailers that we believe are consistent with our key customers’ demographics and shopping preferences. Sales at these stores are derived, in part, from the volume of foot traffic in these locations. Changes in areas around our existing retail locations that result in reductions in customer foot traffic or otherwise render the locations unsuitable could cause our sales to be less than expected and the related leases are generally non-cancelable. Store locations may become unsuitable due to, and our sales volume and customer traffic generally may be harmed by, among other things:

economic downturns in a particular area;

competition from nearby retailers selling similar apparel;

changing consumer demographics in a particular market;

changing preferences of consumers in a particular market;

the closing or decline in popularity of other businesses located near our store; and

store impairments due to acts of God or terrorism.

Our ability to successfully open and operate new retail stores depends on many factors, including, among others, our ability to:

identify new markets where our products and brand image will be accepted or the performance of our retail stores will be successful;

obtain desired locations, including store size and adjacencies, in targeted malls or streets;

negotiate acceptable lease terms, including desired rent and tenant improvement allowances, to secure suitable store locations;

achieve brand awareness, affinity and purchase intent in the new markets;

hire, train and retain store associates and field management;

assimilate new store associates and field management into our corporate culture;

source and supply sufficient inventory levels; and

successfully integrate new retail stores into our existing operations and information technology systems, which will initially be provided by Kellwood under the terms of the Shared Services Agreement.

As of February 1, 2014, we had 28 stores, which consisted of 22 full-price retail stores and six outlet locations. We plan to double our store base over the next three to five years, including opening a net total of six to eight new stores in fiscal 2014. Our new stores, however, may not be immediately profitable and we may incur losses until these stores become profitable. Unavailability of desired store locations, delays in the acquisition or opening of new stores, delays or costs resulting from a decrease in commercial development due to capital restraints, difficulties in staffing and operating new store locations or a lack of customer acceptance of stores in new market areas may negatively impact our new store growth and the costs or the profitability associated with new stores. There can be no assurance that we will open the planned number of stores in fiscal 2014 or thereafter. Any failure to successfully open and operate new stores may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

As we expand our store base, we may be unable to maintain or grow comparable store sales or average sales per square foot at the same rates that we have achieved in the past, which could cause our share price to decline.

As we expand our store base, we may not be able to maintain or grow at the same rates of comparable store sales growth that we have achieved historically. In addition, we may not be able to maintain or grow our historic average sales per square foot as we move into new markets. If our future comparable store sales or average sales per square foot decline or fail to meet market expectations, the price of our common stock could decline. In addition, the aggregate results of operations through our wholesale partners and at our retail locations have fluctuated in the past and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. A variety of factors affect both comparable store sales and average sales per square foot, including, among others, consumer spending patterns, fashion trends, competition, current economic conditions, pricing, inflation, the timing of the release of new merchandise and promotional events, changes in our product assortment, the success of marketing programs and weather conditions. If we misjudge the market for our products, we may incur excess inventory for some of our products and miss opportunities for other products. These factors may cause our comparable store sales results and average sales per square foot in the future to be materially lower than recent periods or our expectations, which could harm our results of operations and result in a decline in the price of our common stock.

We have grown rapidly in recent years and we have limited operating experience as a team at our current scale of operations. If we are unable to manage our operations at our current size or are unable to manage any future growth effectively, our business results and financial performance may suffer.

We have expanded our operations rapidly since our inception in 2002, and we have limited operating experience at our current size. Our business has grown significantly over the past three years, as we have grown our total net sales from $175.3 million in fiscal 2011 to $288.2 million in fiscal 2013. We have made and are making investments to support our near and longer-term growth. If our operations continue to grow over the longer term, of which there can be no assurance, we will be required to expand our sales and marketing, product development and distribution functions, to upgrade our management information systems and other processes, and to obtain more space for our expanding administrative support and other headquarters personnel. Kellwood will continue to provide services to us under the Shared Services Agreement. Our expansion may exceed the capacity that Kellwood is able to provide, on attractive pricing terms or at all, under the terms of the Shared Services Agreement (as more fully described below in “—Problems with our distribution system could harm our ability to meet customer expectations, manage inventory, complete sales and achieve targeted operating efficiencies”). Our continued growth could strain our existing resources, and we could experience operating difficulties, including obtaining sufficient raw materials at acceptable prices, securing manufacturing capacity to produce our products and experiencing delays in production and shipments. These difficulties would likely lead to a decrease in net revenue, income from operations and the price of our common stock.

Kellwood provides us with certain key services for our business. If Kellwood fails to perform its obligations to us or if we do not find appropriate replacement services, we may be unable to perform these services or implement substitute arrangements on a timely and cost-effective basis on terms favorable to us.

Prior to the IPO and Restructuring Transactions that closed on November 27, 2013, we operated as a business unit of Kellwood, and we have historically relied on the financial resources and the administrative and operational support systems of Kellwood to run our business. Some of the Kellwood systems we are using include ERP, human resource management systems and distribution applications. Many of these systems are complex and either highly customized or proprietary. In conjunction with our separation from Kellwood, we are in the process of separating our assets from those of Kellwood and either creating our own financial, administrative, operational and other support systems or contracting with third parties to replace Kellwood’s systems that are not provided to us under the terms of the Shared Services Agreement as discussed below. In order to successfully implement our own systems and operate as a stand-alone business, we must be able to attract and retain a number of highly skilled employees. We must also obtain goods, technology and services

without the benefit of Kellwood’s purchasing power. As an entity separate from Kellwood, we may be unable to obtain such goods, technology and services at prices and on terms as favorable as those available to us prior to the separation, which could increase our costs and reduce our profitability.

We entered into a Shared Services Agreement in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions on November 27, 2013. The Shared Services Agreement governs the provisions by which Kellwood provides certain support services to us, including distribution, information technology and back office support. Kellwood will provide these services until we elect to terminate the provision thereof in accordance with the terms of such agreement or, for services which require a term as a matter of law or which are based on a third-party agreement with a set term, the related termination date specified in the schedule thereto. Upon the termination of certain services, Kellwood may no longer be in a position to provide certain other related services. Assuming we proceed with our request to terminate the original services, such related services shall also be terminated in connection with such termination. The Shared Services Agreement will terminate automatically upon the termination of all services provided thereunder, unless earlier terminated by either party in connection with the other party’s material breach upon 30 days prior notice to such defaulting party. After termination of the agreement, Kellwood will have no obligation to provide any services to us. See “Shared Services Agreement” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” of this annual report on Form 10-K for a description of these services. The services provided under the Shared Services Agreement (as may be amended from time to time) may not be sufficient to meet our needs and we may not be able to replace these services at favorable costs and on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, Kellwood has experienced financial difficulty in the past. For example, in 2009, Kellwood’s independent auditors raised substantial doubt regarding Kellwood’s ability to continue as a going concern. If Kellwood encounters any issues during the transitional period which impact its ability to provide services pursuant to the Shared Services Agreement, our business could be materially harmed. Any failure or significant downtime in our own financial or administrative systems or in Kellwood’s financial or administrative systems during the transitional period and any difficulty in separating our assets from Kellwood’s assets and integrating newly acquired assets into our business could result in unexpected costs, impact our results or prevent us from paying our suppliers and employees and performing other administrative services on a timely basis and could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Any disputes that arise between us and Kellwood with respect to our past and ongoing relationships could harm our business operations.

Disputes may arise between Kellwood and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including:

intellectual property and technology matters;

labor, tax, employee benefit, indemnification and other matters arising from our separation from Kellwood;

employee retention and recruiting;

business combinations involving us;

the nature, quality and pricing of transitional services Kellwood has agreed to provide us; and

business opportunities that may be attractive to both Kellwood and us.

We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and even if we do, the resolution may be less favorable than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party. As of February 1, 2014, affiliates of Sun Capital, who also control Kellwood, owned approximately 68% of our common stock. Additionally, Sun Cardinal, LLC, an affiliate of Sun Capital, has the ability to designate a majority of our directors.

Our limited operating experience and brand recognition in international markets may delay our expansion strategy and cause our business and growth to suffer.

We face additional risks with respect to our strategy to expand internationally, including our efforts to further expand our business in Canada, select European countries, Asia and the Middle East through company-operated locations, wholesale arrangements as well as with international partners. Our current operations are based largely in the U.S., with international wholesale sales representing approximately 8%10% of net sales for fiscal 2013.2016. Therefore, we have a limited number of customers and experience in operating outside of the U.S. We also do not have extensive experience with regulatory environments and market practices outside of the U.S. and cannot guarantee, notwithstanding our international partners’ familiarity with such environments and market practices, that we will be able to penetrate or successfully operate in any market outside of the U.S. Many of these markets have different operational characteristics, including employment and labor regulations, transportation, logistics, real estate (including lease terms) and local reporting or legal requirements. See – “Changes in laws, including employment laws and laws related to our merchandise, as well as foreign laws, could make conducting our business more expensive or otherwise change the way we do business.”

Furthermore, consumer demand and behavior, as well as style preferences, size and fit, and purchasing trends, may differ in these markets and, as a result, sales of our product may not be successful, or the margins on those sales may not be in line with those that we currently anticipate. In addition, in many of these markets there is significant competition to attract and retain experienced and talented employees. Failure to develop new markets outside of the U.S. or disappointing sales growth outside of the U.S. may harm our business and results of operations.

In addition, in January 2017, we established a subsidiary of Vince, LLC in France in the form of a “societe a responsibilitee limitee” and became subject to French laws including tax, employment and corporate laws, which may vary from those that previously governed the French branch of Vince, LLC. We are in the early stages of complying with the laws relating to our French subsidiary. If we fail to comply with some or all of those laws, we may be subject to fines or penalties that could negatively impact our business and results of operations.

Our plans to improve and expand our product offerings may not be successful, and the implementation of these plans may divert our operational, managerial and administrative resources, which could harm our competitive position and reduce our net revenue and profitability.

In addition to our store expansion strategy, weWe plan to grow our business by increasing our core product offerings, which includes expanding our men’s collection denim,and women’s outerwear women’s bottomsassortment and dresses assortment. We also plan to develop and introduce selectintroducing new product categories and pursue select additional licensing opportunities such as intimates/loungewear, men’s footwearlifestyle products. In December 2016, we partnered with various third parties and fashion accessories.launched Vince Collective, through which we now offer a curated selection of home goods and accessories in select retail stores and on our website.

The principal risks to our ability to successfully carry out our plans to improve and expand our product offerings are that:

if our expected product offerings fail to maintain and enhance our brand identity, our image may be diminished or diluted and our sales may decrease;

if we fail to find and enter into relationships with external partners with the necessary specialized expertise or execution capabilities, we may be unable to offer our planned product extensions or to realize the additional revenue we have targeted for those extensions; and

the use of licensing partners may limit our ability to conduct comprehensive final quality checks on merchandise before it is shipped to our stores or to our wholesale partners.

In addition, our ability to successfully carry out our plans to improve and expand our product offerings may be affected by economic and competitive conditions, changes in consumer spending patterns and changes in consumer preferences and style trends.

14


These plans could be abandoned, could cost more than anticipated and could divert resources from other areas of our business, any of which could impact our competitive position and reduce our net revenue and profitability.

Our current and future licensing arrangements may not be successful and may make us susceptible to the actions of third parties over whom we have limited control.

Our current and futureWe currently have product licensing arrangements may not be successful and may make us susceptible to the actions of third parties over whom we have limited control. We entered into a licensing agreement when we launchedagreements for women’s footwear in 2012 and signed a licensing agreement in 2013 for the launch of children’s apparel in 2014. We also signed agreements to launch men’s footwear in 2014 through a licensing partner.footwear. In the future, we may enter into select additional licensing arrangements for product offerings which require specialized

expertise. We may also enterIn addition, we have entered into select licensing agreements pursuant to which we may granthave granted certain third parties the right to distribute and sell our products in certain geographic areas.areas, and may continue to do so in the future. Although we have taken and will continue to take steps to select potential licensing partners carefully and monitor the activities of our existing licensing partners (through, among other things, approval rights over product design, production quality, packaging, merchandising, marketing, distribution and advertising), such arrangements may not be successful. Our licensing partners may fail to fulfill their obligations under their license agreements or have interests that differ from or conflict with our own, such as the pricing of our products and the offering of competitive products. In addition, the risks applicable to the business of our licensing partners may be different than the risks applicable to our business, including risks associated with each such partner’s ability to:

obtain capital;

exercise operational and financial control over its business;

manage its labor relations;

maintain relationships with suppliers;

manage its credit and bankruptcy risks; and

maintain customer relationships.

Any of the foregoing risks, or the inability of any of our licensing partners to successfully market our products or otherwise conduct its business, may result in loss of revenue and competitive harm to our operations in regions or product categories where we have entered into such licensing arrangements.

Our business will suffer if we fail to respond to changing customer tastes.

Customer tastes can change rapidly. We may not be able to anticipate, gauge or respond to these changes within a timely manner. We may also not be able to continue to satisfy our customers’ existing tastes and preferences. If we misjudge the market for products or product groups, or if we fail to identify and respond appropriately to changing consumer demands, we may be faced with unsold finished goods inventory, which could materially adversely affect expected operating results and decrease sales, gross margins and profitability.

If we are unable to accurately forecast customer demand for our products, our manufacturers may not be able to deliver products to meet our requirements, and this could result in delays in the shipment of products to our stores, wholesale partners and to wholesale partners.e-commerce customers.

We stock our stores, and provide inventory to our wholesale partners, based on our or their estimates of future demand for particular products. Our inventory management and planning team determines the number of pieces of each product that we will order from our manufacturers based upon past sales of similar products, sales trend information and anticipated demand at our suggested retail prices. However, if our inventory and planning team fails to accurately forecast customer demand, we may experience excess inventory levels or a shortage of products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully manage our inventory at a level appropriate for future customer demand.

Factors that could affect our inventory management and planning team’s ability to accurately forecast customer demand for our products include:

a substantial increase or decrease in demand for our products or for products of our competitors;

our failure to accurately forecast customer acceptance for our new products;

new product introductions or pricing strategies by competitors;

changes in our product items across seasonal fashion items and replenishment;

changes to our overall seasonal promotional cadence and the number and timing of promotional events;

more limited historical store sales information for our newer markets;

weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in the future, which could reduce demand for discretionary items, such as our products; and

acts or threats of war or terrorism which could adversely affect consumer confidence and spending or interrupt production and distribution of our products and our raw materials.

BecauseIn fiscal 2015, we recorded a charge of our rapid growth, we have occasionally placed insufficient levels$10,300 associated with inventory write-downs of desirableexcess and aged product with our wholesale partners and in our retail locations such that we were unable to fully satisfy customer demand at those locations.inventory. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to match supply with demand in all cases in the future, whether as a result of our inability to produce sufficient levels of desirable product or our failure to forecast demand accurately. As a result of these inabilities or failures, we may in the future encounter further difficulties in filling customer orders or in liquidating excess inventory at discount prices and may experience significant write-offs. Additionally, if we over-produce a product based on an aggressive forecast of demand, retailers may not be able to sell the product and cancel future orders or require give backs. These outcomes could have a material adverse effect on brand image and adversely impact sales, gross margins and profitability.profitability.

Our senior management team has limited experience working together as a group,15


If we lose any key personnel, are unable to attract key personnel, or assimilate and retain our key personnel, we may not be able to managesuccessfully operate or grow our business effectively.

Our CEO, Jill Granoff, and CFO, Lisa Klinger, joined the company in 2012. Many of the other members of our senior management team, including our President and Chief Creative Officer, Karin Gregersen, have been with us less than 18 months. As a result, our senior management team has limited experience working together as a group. This lack of shared experience could negatively impact our senior management team’s ability to quickly and efficiently respond to problems and effectively manage our business. If our management team is not able to work together as a group, our results of operations may suffer and our business may be harmed.

Loss of key personnel could disrupt our operations.

Our continued success is dependent on theour ability to attract, assimilate, retain and motivate qualified management, designers, administrative talent and sales associates to support existing operations and future growth. Competition for qualified talent in the apparel and fashion industry is intense, and we compete for these individuals with other companies that in many cases have greater financial and other resources. The loss of the services of any members of senior management or the inability to attract and retain other qualified executives could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we will need to continue to attract, assimilate, retain and motivate highly talented employees with a range of other skills and experience, especially at the store management levels. Although we have hired and trained new store managers and experienced sales associates at several of our retail locations, competition for employees in our industry is intense and we may from time to time experience difficulty in retaining our associates or attracting the additional talent necessary to support the growth of our business. These problems could be exacerbated as we embark on our strategy of opening new retail stores over the next several years. We will also need to attract, assimilate and retain other professionals across a range of disciplines, including design, production, sourcing and international business, as we develop new product categories and continue to expand our international presence. In addition, in February 2017, we mutually agreed to end the agreements with the consultants who provided consulting services to oversee the Company’s product, merchandising and creative efforts. If we are unable to attract, assimilate and retain our employees with the necessary skills and experience, including employees filling the roles performed by the consultants, we may not be able to grow or successfully operate our business, which would have an adverse impact on our results.

Our competitive position could suffer if our intellectual property rights are not protected.

We believe that our trademarks and designs are of great value. From time to time, third parties have challenged, and may in the future try to challenge, our ownership of our intellectual property. In some cases, third parties with similar trademarks or other intellectual property may have pre-existing and potentially conflicting trademark registrations. We rely on cooperation from third parties with similar trademarks to be able to register our trademarks in jurisdictions in which such third parties have already registered their trademarks. We are susceptible to others imitating our products and infringing our intellectual property rights. Imitation or counterfeiting of our products or infringement of our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our brands or otherwise adversely affect our revenues. The actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights may not be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to invalidate our trademarks or block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks and intellectual property rights of others. In addition, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other intellectual property rights or in similar marks or marks that we license and/or market and we may not be able to successfully resolve these conflicts to our satisfaction. We may need to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. Successful infringement claims against us could result in significant monetary liability or prevent us from selling some of our products. In addition, resolution of claims may require us to redesign our products, license rights from third parties or cease using those rights altogether. Any of these events could harm our business and cause our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition to suffer.

We license our website domain name from a third-party. Pursuant to the license agreement (the “License“Domain License Agreement”), our license to usewww.vince.com will expire in 2018 and will automatically renew for successive one year periods, subject to our right to terminate the arrangement with or without cause; provided, that we must pay the applicable early termination fee and provide 30 days prior notice in connection with a termination without cause. The licensor has no termination rights under the Domain License Agreement. Any failure by the licensor to perform its obligations under the License Agreement could adversely affect our brand and make it more difficult for users to find our website.

Problems with our distribution systemOur goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets could harm our abilitybecome further impaired, which may require us to meet customer expectations, manage inventory, complete sales and achieve targeted operating efficiencies.take significant non-cash charges against earnings.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 350 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually during the U.S.,fourth fiscal quarter and in an interim period if a triggering event occurs. Determining the fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. We base our estimates on assumptions we rely on a distribution facility operated by Kellwood in Citybelieve to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. During the fourth quarter of Industry, California. Our abilityfiscal 2016, the Company recorded impairment charges of $22,311 related to meet the needsdirect-to-consumer reporting unit goodwill and $30,750 related to the tradename intangible asset. It is possible that our current estimates of our wholesale partnersfuture operating results could change adversely and our own retail stores depends onimpact the proper operation of this distribution facility. Kellwood will continue to provide distribution services, until we elect to terminate such services, as partevaluation of the Shared Services Agreement. We also have a warehouse in Belgium operated by a third-party logistics provider to support our wholesale orders for customers located in Europe.recoverability of the remaining carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets and that the effect of such changes could be material. There can be no assuranceassurances that we will not be ablerequired to enter into other contracts for an alternate or replacement distribution centers on acceptable terms or at all. Such an event could disruptrecord further charges in our operations. In addition, because substantially allfinancial statements which would negatively impact our results of operations during the period in which any impairment of our products are distributed from one location, our operations could also be interrupted by labor difficulties,goodwill or by floods, fires, earthquakes or other natural disasters near such facility. We maintain business interruption insurance and are a beneficiary under similar Kellwood insurance policies related to Kellwoodintangible assets or services we utilize under the Shared Services Agreement. These policies, however, may not adequately protect us from the adverse effects that could result from significant disruptions to our distribution system. If we encounter problems with our distribution system, our ability to meet customer expectations, manage inventory, complete sales and achieve targeted operating efficiencies could be harmed. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.is determined.

16


The extent of our foreign sourcing may adversely affect our business.

Our products are primarily produced by, and purchased or procured from, independent manufacturing contractors located outside of the U.S.,We work with approximately 93%40 manufacturers across five countries, with 92% of our total revenue forproducts produced in China in fiscal 2013 attributable to manufacturing contractors located outside of the U.S. These manufacturing contractors are located mainly in countries in Asia and South America, with approximately 86% of our purchases for fiscal 2013 attributable to manufacturing contractors located in China.2016. A manufacturing contractor’s failure to ship products to us in a timely manner or to meet the required quality standards could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers for those items. The failure to make timely deliveries may cause customers to cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reduced prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. As a result of the magnitude of our foreign sourcing, our business is subject to the following risks:

political and economic instability in countries or regions, especially Asia, including heightened terrorism and other security concerns, which could subject imported or exported goods to additional or more frequent inspections, leading to delays in deliveries or impoundment of goods;

imposition of regulations, quotas and other trade restrictions relating to imports, including quotas imposed by bilateral textile agreements between the U.S. and foreign countries;

imposition of increased duties, taxes and other charges on imports;

labor union strikes at ports through which our products enter the U.S.;

labor shortages in countries where contractors and suppliers are located;

a significant decrease in availability or an increase in the cost of raw materials;

restrictions on the transfer of funds to or from foreign countries;

disease epidemics and health-related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas;

the migration and development of manufacturing contractors, which could affect where our products are or are planned to be produced;

increases in the costs of fuel, travel and transportation;

reduced manufacturing flexibility because of geographic distance between our foreign manufacturers and us, increasing the risk that we may have to mark down unsold inventory as a result of misjudging the market for a foreign-made product; and

violations by foreign contractors of labor and wage standards and resulting adverse publicity.

If these risks limit or prevent us from manufacturing products in any significant international market, prevent us from acquiring products from foreign suppliers, or significantly increase the cost of our products, our operations could be seriously disrupted until alternative suppliers are found or alternative markets are developed, which could negatively impact our business.

We do not have written agreements with any of our third-party manufacturing contractors. As a result, any single manufacturing contractor could unilaterally terminate its relationship with us at any time. One of our manufacturers in China, with whom we have worked for over five years, accounted for the production of approximately 12% of our finished products during fiscal 2013. Supply disruptions from this manufacturer (or any of our other manufacturers) could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet customer demands, if we are unable to source suitable replacement materials at acceptable prices or at all. Our inability to promptly replace manufacturing contractors that terminate their relationships with us or cease to provide high quality products in a timely and cost-efficient manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of raw materials could cause delays and increase costs and cause our operating results and financial condition to suffer.

Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of the fabrics or other raw materials, particularly cotton, silk, leather and synthetics used in our manufactured apparel, could have a material adverse effect on cost of sales or our ability to meet customer demands. The prices of fabrics depend largely on the market prices of the raw materials used to produce them. The price and availability of the raw materials and, in turn, the fabrics used in our apparel may fluctuate significantly, depending on many factors, including crop yields, weather patterns, labor costs and changes in oil prices. We may not be able to create suitable design solutions that utilize raw materials with attractive prices or, alternatively, to pass higher raw materials prices and related transportation costs on to our customers. We are not always successful in our efforts to protect our business from the volatility of the market price of raw materials, and our business can be materially affected by dramatic movements in prices of raw materials. The ultimate effect of this change on our earnings cannot be quantified, as the effect of movements in raw materials prices on industry selling prices are uncertain, but any significant increase in these prices could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our reliance on independent manufacturers could cause delays or quality issues which could damage customer relationships.

We use independent manufacturers to assemble or produce all of our products, whether inside or outside the U.S. We are dependent on the ability of these independent manufacturers to adequately finance the production of goods ordered and maintain sufficient manufacturing capacity. The use of independent manufacturers to produce finished goods and the resulting lack of direct control could subject us to difficulty in obtaining timely delivery of products of acceptable quality. We generally do not have long-term contractswritten agreements with any independent manufacturers. AlternativeAs a result, any single manufacturing contractor could unilaterally terminate its relationship with us at any time. Our top five manufacturers accounted for the production of approximately 52% of our finished products during fiscal 2016. Supply disruptions from these manufacturers (or any of our other manufacturers) could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet customer demands, if we are unable to source suitable replacement materials at acceptable prices or at all. Moreover, alternative manufacturers, if available, may not be able to provide us with products or services of a comparable quality, at an acceptable price or on a timely basis. We may also, from time to time, make a decision to enter into a relationship with a new manufacturer. Identifying a suitable supplier is an involved process that requires us to become satisfied with their quality control, responsiveness and service, financial stability and labor and other ethical practices. There can be no assurance

17


that there will not be a disruption in the

supply of our products from independent manufacturers or that any new manufacturer will be successful in producing our products in a manner we expected. In the event of any disruption with a disruption, thatmanufacturer, we wouldmay not be able to substitute suitable alternative manufacturers in a timely and cost-efficient manner. The failure of any independent manufacturer to perform or the loss of any independent manufacturer could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If our independent manufacturers fail to use ethical business practices and comply with applicable laws and regulations, our brand image could be harmed due to negative publicity.

We have established and currently maintain operating guidelines which promote ethical business practices such as fair wage practices, compliance with child labor laws and other local laws. While we monitor compliance with those guidelines, we do not control our independent manufacturers or their business practices. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee their compliance with our guidelines. A lack of demonstrated compliance could lead us to seek alternative suppliers, which could increase our costs and result in delayed delivery of our products, product shortages or other disruptions of our operations.

Violation of labor or other laws by our independent manufacturers or the divergence of an independent manufacturer’s labor or other practices from those generally accepted as ethical in the U.S. or other markets in which we do business could also attract negative publicity for us and our brand. From time to time, our audit results have revealed a lack of compliance in certain respects, including with respect to local labor, safety and environmental laws. Other apparelfashion companies have faced criticism after highly-publicized incidents or compliance issues have occurred or been exposed at factories producing their products. To the extent our manufacturers do not bring their operations into compliance with such laws or resolve material issues identified in any of our audit results, we may face similar criticism and negative publicity. This could diminish the value of our brand image and reduce demand for our merchandise. In addition, other apparelfashion companies have encountered organized boycotts of their products in such situations. If we, or other companies in our industry, encounter similar problems in the future, it could harm our brand image, stock price and results of operations.

Monitoring compliance by independent manufacturers is complicated by the fact that expectations of ethical business practices continually evolve, may be substantially more demanding than applicable legal requirements and are driven in part by legal developments and by diverse groups active in publicizing and organizing public responses to perceived ethical shortcomings. Accordingly, we cannot predict how such expectations might develop in the future and cannot be certain that our guidelines would satisfy all parties who are active in monitoring and publicizing perceived shortcomings in labor and other business practices worldwide.

Our operating results aremay be subject to seasonal and quarterly variations in our net revenue and income from operations,operations.

The apparel and fashion industry in which could causewe operate is cyclical and, consequently, our revenues are affected by general economic conditions and the priceseasonal trends characteristic to the apparel and fashion industry.  Purchases of our common stockapparel are sensitive to decline.

We have experienced,a number of factors that influence the level of consumer spending, including economic conditions and expect to continue to experience, seasonal variations in our net revenue andthe level of disposable consumer income, consumer debt, interest rates, consumer confidence as well as the impact from operations. Seasonal variations in our net revenue are primarily related to increased sales of our products during our fiscal third and fourth quarters, reflecting our historical strength in sales during the fall and holiday seasons. Historically, seasonable variations in our income from operations have been driven principally by increased net revenue in such fiscal quarters.

Our rapid growth may have overshadowed whatever seasonal or cyclical factors might have influenced our business to date.adverse weather conditions. In addition, as our revenue mix evolves over time to include more sales from additional retail stores, we may see an increasefluctuations in the percentageamount of sales occurring duringin any fiscal quarter are affected by the fourth quarter. Suchtiming of seasonal or cyclical variations in our businesswholesale shipments and events affecting direct-to-consumer sales; as such, the financial results for any particular quarter may harm ournot be indicative of results of operations infor the future, if we do not plan inventory appropriately, if customer shopping patterns fluctuate during such seasonal periods or if bad weather during the fourth quarter constrains shopping activity.

fiscal year. Any future seasonal or quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations may not match the expectations of market analysts and investors to assess the longer-term profitability and strength of our business at any particular point, which could lead to increased volatility in our stock price. Increased volatility

Our growth strategy includes opening, operating and maintaining successful retail stores in suitable select locations. If we are unable to execute this strategy in a timely manner, or at all, our financial condition and results of operations could causebe materially and adversely affected.

As part of our stock pricegrowth strategy, we intend to sufferopen and operate successful retail stores, both domestically and internationally, in comparisontargeted streets or malls with desired size and adjacencies, typically near luxury retailers that we believe are consistent with our key customers’ demographics and shopping preferences. The success of this strategy depends on a number of factors, including the identification of suitable markets and sites, negotiation of acceptable lease and renewal terms while securing those favorable locations, including desired rent and tenant improvement allowances, and if entering a new market, the achievement of brand awareness, affinity and purchase intent in that market, as well as our business condition in funding the opening and operations of stores. Furthermore, we may not be able to less volatile investments.

maintain the successful operation of our retail stores if the areas around our existing retail locations undergo changes that result in reductions in customer foot traffic or otherwise render the locations unsuitable, such as economic downturns in the area, changes in demographics and customer preferences and closing or decline in popularity of the adjacent stores. During fiscal 2016, we recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $2,082, within selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, related to the impairment of property and equipment of certain retail stores with carrying values that were determined not to be recoverable and exceeded fair value. If we are unable to successfully implement our retail

18


strategy in a timely manner, or at all, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, including the potential of further impairments of tangible assets.

As of January 28, 2017, we operated 54 stores, including 40 company-operated full-price stores and 14 company-operated outlet stores throughout the United States. We opened six new stores in fiscal 2016 and plan to increase our store base based on business needs, including the expected opening of one new store in fiscal 2017.

We are subject to risks associated with leasing retail and office space, are generally subject to long-term non-cancelable leases and are required to make substantial lease payments under our operating leases, and any failure to make these lease payments when due would likely harm our business, profitability and results of operations.

We do not own any of our stores, or our offices including our New York and Los Angeles offices, or our showroom space in Paris but instead lease all of our retail storessuch space under operating leases. Our leases generally have initial terms of 10 years, and generally can be extended only for one additional 5-year term. AllSubstantially all of our leases require a fixed annual rent, and most require the payment of additional rent if store sales exceed a negotiated amount. Most of our leases are “net” leases, which require us to pay all of the cost of insurance, taxes, maintenance and utilities, and we generally cannot cancel these leases at our option. Additionally, certain of our leases allow the lessor to terminate the lease if we do not achieve a specified gross sales threshold. We have experienced circumstances in the past where landlords have attempted to invoke these contractual provisions. Although we believe we will achieve the required threshold to continue those leases, we cannot assure you that we will do so. Any loss of our store locations due to underperformance may harm our results of operations, stock price and reputation.

Payments under these leases account for a significant portion of our SG&Aselling, general and administrative expenses. For example, as of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we were a party to 59 operating leases associated with our retail stores and corporate headquartersour office and showroom spaces requiring future minimum lease payments of $10.1 million$21,096 in the aggregate through fiscal 20142017 and approximately $84.7 million$129,695 thereafter. We expect that anyAny new retail stores we open will also be leased by us under operating leases which will further increase our operating lease expenses and require significant capital expenditures. Our substantial operating lease obligations could have significant negative consequences, including, among others:

increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;

requiring a substantial portion of our available cash to pay our rental obligations, thus reducing cash available for other purposes;

limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business or in the industry in which we compete; and

placing us at a disadvantage with respect to some of our competitors.

We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our lease expenses and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities, and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under our new credit facilities or from other sources, we may not be able to service our operating lease expenses, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which would harm our business.

In addition, additional sites that we lease are likely to be subject to similar long-term non-cancelable leases. If an existing or future store is not profitable, and we decide to close it, we may nonetheless be committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease including, among other things, paying the base rent for the balance of the lease term if we cannot negotiate a mutually acceptable termination payment. In addition, as our leases expire, we may fail to negotiate renewals, either on commercially acceptable terms or at all, which could cause us to close stores in desirable locations. Oflocations or incur costs in relocating our office space. In fiscal 2017, two of our existing leases no existing retail leases expire in fiscal 2014 and one lease expires in fiscal 2015.will expire. If we are unable to enter into new leases or renew existing leases on terms acceptable to us or be released from our obligations under leases for stores that we close, our business, profitability and results of operations may be harmed.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may materially increase our costs and/or make it harder for us to compete as an employer.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act imposed new mandates on employers, including a requirement effective January 1, 2014 (which has temporarily been extended to January 1, 2015 due to a recent

executive order) that employers with 50 or more full-time employees provide “credible” health insurance to employees or pay a financial penalty. Given our current health plan design, and assuming the law is implemented without significant changes, these mandates could materially increase our costs. Moreover, if we choose to opt out of offering health insurance to our employees, we may become less attractive as an employer and it may be harder for us to compete for qualified employees.

System security risk issues could disrupt our internal operations or information technology services, and any such disruption could negatively impact our net sales, increase our expenses and harm our reputation.

Experienced computer programmers and hackers, and even internal users, may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information or that of third parties, including our customers, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. In addition, employee error, malfeasance or other errors in the storage, use or transmission of any such information could result in a disclosure to third parties outside of our network. As a result, we could incur significant expenses addressing problems created by any such inadvertent disclosure or any security breaches of our network. This risk is heightened because we collect and store customer information, including credit card information, and use certain customer information for our marketing purposes. In addition, we rely on third parties for the operation of our website,www.vince.com, and for the various social media tools and websites we use as part of our marketing strategy.

Consumers are increasingly concerned over the security of personal information transmitted over the internet, consumer identity theft and user privacy, and any compromise of customer information could subject us to customer or government litigation and harm our reputation, which could adversely affect our business and growth. Moreover, we could incur significant expenses or disruptions of our operations in connection with system failures or breaches. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we procure form third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of our systems. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate security problems, viruses and bugs, or any problems associated with the outsourced services could be significant, and the efforts to address these problems could result in interruptions, delays or cessation of service that may impeded our sales, distribution or other critical functions. In addition to taking the necessary precautions ourselves, we require that third-party service providers implement reasonable security measures to protect our customers’ identity and privacy. We do not, however, control these third-party service providers and cannot guarantee that no electronic or physical computer break-ins and security breaches will occur in the future.

Changes in laws, including employment laws and laws related to our merchandise, could make conducting our business more expensive or otherwise change the way we do business.

We are subject to numerous regulations, including labor and employment, customs, truth-in-advertising, consumer protection, and zoning and occupancy laws and ordinances that regulate retailers generally or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of stores and warehouse facilities. If these regulations were to change or were violated by our management, employees, vendors, independent manufacturers or partners, the costs of certain goods could increase, or we could experience delays in shipments of our products, be subject to fines or penalties, or suffer reputational harm, which could reduce demand for our merchandise and hurt our business and results of operations.

In addition to increased regulatory compliance requirements, changes in laws could make ordinary conduct of business more expensive or require us to change the way we do business. For example, changes in federal and state minimum wage laws could raise the wage requirements for certain of our employees at our retail locations, which would increase our selling costs and may cause us to reexamine our wage structure for such employees. Other laws related to employee benefits and treatment of employees, including laws related to limitations on employee hours, supervisory status, leaves of absence, mandated health benefits, overtime pay,

19


unemployment tax rates and citizenship requirements, could negatively impact us, by increasing compensation and benefits costs which would in turn reduce our profitability.

Moreover, changes in product safety or other consumer protection laws could lead to increased costs to us for certain merchandise, or additional labor costs associated with readying merchandise for sale. It is often difficult for us to plan and prepare for potential changes to applicable laws and future actions or payments related to such changes could be material to us.

If we are unable to attract, assimilate and retain new employees, we may not be able to grow or successfully operate our business.

To be successful in continuing to grow our business, we will need to continue to attract, assimilate, retain and motivate highly talented employees with a range of skills and experience, especially at the store management levels. Although we have recently hired and trained new store managers and experienced sales associates at several of our retail locations, competition for employees in our industry is intense and we may from time to time experience difficulty in retaining our associates or attracting the additional talent necessary to support the growth of our business. These problems could be exacerbated as we embark on our strategy of opening new retail stores over the next several years. We will also need to attract and retain other professionals across a range of disciplines, including design, production, sourcing and international business, as we develop new product categories and continue to expand our international presence. Furthermore, we will need to recruit employees to provide, or enter into consulting or outsourcing arrangements with respect to the provision of, services provided by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement when Kellwood no longer provides such services thereunder. If we are unable to attract, assimilate and retain additional employees with the necessary skills, we may not be able to grow or successfully operate our business.

Our operations are restricted by our new credit facilities entered into on November 27, 2013.

We entered into a new revolving credit facility and a new term loan facility in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions closed on November 27, 2013. Our new facilities contain significant restrictive covenants. These covenants may impair our financing and operational flexibility and make it difficult for us to react to market conditions and satisfy our ongoing capital needs and unanticipated cash requirements. Specifically, such covenants will likely restrict our ability and, if applicable, the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

incur additional debt;

make certain investments and acquisitions;

enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;

use assets as security in other transactions;

pay dividends;

sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies;

guarantee the debt of others;

enter into new lines of businesses;

make capital expenditures;

prepay, redeem or exchange our debt; and

form any joint ventures or subsidiary investments.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and other terms of our debt obligations will depend on our future operating performance. If we fail to comply with such covenants and terms, we would be required to obtain waivers from our lenders to maintain compliance with our debt obligations. If we are unable to obtain any necessary waivers and the debt is accelerated, a material adverse effect on our financial condition and future operating performance would likely result. The terms of our debt obligations may restrict or delay our ability to fulfill our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Tax Receivable

Agreement, delayed or unpaid amounts thereunder would accrue interest at a default rate of one-year LIBOR plus 300 basis points until paid. Our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could result in a failure to comply with covenants or financial ratios required by our debt financing agreements and could result in an event of default under such a debt financing. See “Tax Receivable Agreement” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” of this annual report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement.

We are required to pay forto the Pre-IPO Stockholders 85% of certain tax benefits, and could be required to make substantial cash payments in which our stockholders will not participate.

We entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions which closed on November 27, 2013. Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, we will be obligated to pay to the Pre-IPO Stockholders an amount equal to 85% of the cash savings in federal, state and local income tax realized by us by virtue of our future use of the federal, state and local net operating losses (“NOLs”) held by us as of November 27, 2013, together with section 197 intangible deductions (collectively, the “Pre-IPO Tax Benefits”). “Section 197 intangible deductions” means amortization deductions with respect to certain amortizable intangible assets which are held by us and our subsidiaries immediately after November 27, 2013. Cash tax savings generally will be computed by comparing our actual federal, state and local income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had such Pre-IPO Tax Benefits not been available to us. While payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement will depend upon a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income we generate in the future and any future limitations that may be imposed on our ability to use the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits, the payments could be substantial.substantial and could potentially exceed any cash flow benefits realized in any particular year. Assuming the federal, state and local corporate income tax rates presently in effect, no material change in applicable tax law and no limitation on our ability to use the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits under Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”), the estimated cash benefit of the full use of these Pre-IPO Tax Benefits as of January 28, 2017 would be approximately $205 million,$203,357, of which 85%, or approximately $173 million,$172,853 plus accrued interest, is potentially payable to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement. TheAs of January 28, 2017, $140,618, plus accrued interest, is currently outstanding. Accordingly, the Tax Receivable Agreement accordingly could require us to make substantial cash payments.

Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), to challenge any tax benefits arising under the Tax Receivable Agreement, the affiliates of Sun Capital will not reimburse us for any payments previously made if such benefits subsequently were disallowed, although the amount of any tax savings subsequently disallowed will reduce any future payment otherwise owed to the Pre-IPO Stockholders. For example, if our determinations regarding the applicability (or lack thereof) and amount of any limitations on the NOLs under Section 382 of the Code were to be successfully challenged by the IRS after payments relating to such NOLs had been made to the Pre-IPO Stockholders, we would not be reimbursed by the Pre-IPO Stockholders and our recovery would be limited to the extent of future payments (if any) otherwise remaining under the Tax Receivable Agreement. As a result, in such circumstances we could make payments to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of our actual cash tax savings. Furthermore, while we will generally only make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement after we have recognized a cash flow benefit from the utilization of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits, (other than upon a change of control or other acceleration event), the payments required under the agreement could require us to use a substantial portion of our cash from operations for those purposes.

At the effective date of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the liability recognized was accounted for in our financial statements as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Subsequent changes in the Tax Receivable Agreement liability will be recorded through earnings in operating expenses.earnings. Even if the NOLs are available to us, the Tax Receivable Agreement will operate to transfer significantly all85% of the benefit to the Pre-IPO Stockholders. Additionally, the payments we make to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement are not expected to give rise to any incidental tax benefits to us, such as deductions or an adjustment to the basis of our assets.

Federal and state laws impose substantial restrictions on the utilization of NOL carry-forwards in the event of an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Code. Under the rules, such an ownership change is generally any change in ownership of more than 50 percent of a company’s stock within a rolling three-year period, as calculated in accordance with the rules. The rules generally operate by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders considered by the rules as owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of the company and any change in ownership arising from new issuances of stock by the company.

While we have performed an analysis under Section 382 of the Code that indicates the IPO and Restructuring Transactions would not constitute an ownership change, such technical guidelines are complex and subject to significant judgment and interpretation. With the IPO and Restructuring Transactions and other transactions that have occurred over the past three years, we may trigger or have already triggered an “ownership change” limitation. We may also experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in stock ownership. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use the pre-change NOL carry-forwards (after giving effect to payments to be made to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement) to offset U.S. federal taxable income may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our analysis to date under Section 382 of the Code indicates that the IPO Restructuring Transactions have not triggered an “ownership change” limitation.

If we did not enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement, we would be entitled to realize the full economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits, to the extent allowed by federal, state and local law, including Section 382 of the Code. Subject to exceptions, the Tax Receivable Agreement is designed with the objective of causing our annual cash costs attributable to federal state and local income taxes (without regard to our continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits) to be the same as we would have paid had we not

20


had the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits available to offset our federal, state and local taxable income. As a result, we will not be entitled to the economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits that would have been available if the Tax Receivable Agreement were not in effect (except to the extent of our continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits).

In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement to the Pre-IPO stockholdersStockholders may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits.

Upon the election of an affiliate of Sun Capital to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement pursuant to a change in control (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) or upon our election to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement early, all of our payment and other obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be accelerated and will become due and payable. Additionally, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that in the event that we breach any of our material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the Tax Receivable Agreement in a case commenced under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) then all of our payment and other obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be accelerated and will become due and payable.

In the case of any such acceleration, we would be required to make an immediate payment equal to 85% of the present value of the tax savings represented by any portion of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits for which payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement has not already been made, which upfront payment may be made years in advance of the actual realization of such future benefits. Such payments could be substantial and could exceed our actual cash tax savings from the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits. In these situations, our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash available or that we will be able to finance our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

If we were to elect to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement, based on a discount rate equal to monthly LIBOR plus 300200 basis points, we estimate that as of January 28, 2017 we would be required to pay approximately $159 million$126,666 in the aggregate under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

We could incur significant costs in complying with environmental, health and safety laws or as a result of satisfying any liability or obligation imposed under such laws.

Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We could be held liable for the costs to address contamination of any real property ever owned, operated or used as a disposal site. In addition, in the event that Kellwood becomes financially incapable of addressing the environmental liability incurred prior to the structural reorganization separating Kellwood from Vince that occurred on November 27, 2013, a third-partythird party may file suit and attempt to allege that Kellwood and Vince engaged in a fraudulent transfer by arguing that the purpose of the separation of the non-Vince assets from Vince Holding Corp. was to insulate our assets from the environmental liability. For example, pursuant to a Consent Decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the State of Missouri, a non-Vince subsidiary, of Vince Holding Corp., which was separated from us in the Restructuring Transactions, is conducting a cleanup of contamination at the site of a plant in New Haven, Missouri, which occurred between 1973 and 1985. Kellwood has posted a letter of credit in the amount of $5.9 millionapproximately $5,900 as a performance guarantee for the estimated cost of the required remediation work. In connection with the Kellwood Sale, the letter of credit was transferred to the account of the Kellwood Purchaser. If, despite the financial assurance provided by Kellwoodthe letter of credit as required by the EPA, the buyer of Kellwood became financially unable to address this remediation, and if the corporate separateness of Vince is disregarded or if a fraudulent transfer is found to have occurred, we could be liable for the full amount of the remediation. If this were to occur or if we were to becamebecome liable for other environmental liabilities or obligations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We will incur significant expenses as a result of being a public company, which will negatively impact our financial performance and could cause our results of operations and financial condition to suffer.

We will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance, share-based compensation and other expenses as a result of being a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as related rules implemented by the SEC and the securities regulators and by the NYSE, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect that compliance with these laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act once we are no longer an emerging growth company, will substantially increase our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs, and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also expect these laws, rules and regulations to make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or to incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers. To assist in the recruitment of qualified directors, officers and other members of senior management and to help align their interests with those of our stockholders, we have made and intend to continue to make equity grants under our new management equity incentive plan (the “Vince 2013 Incentive Plan”). As a result of the foregoing, we expect an increase in legal, accounting, insurance, share based compensation and certain other expenses in the future, which will negatively impact our financial performance and could cause our results of operations and financial condition to suffer.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership

We are a “controlled company,” controlled by investment funds advised by affiliates of Sun Capital, whose interests in our business may be different from yours.

Affiliates of Sun Capital owned approximately 68%58% of our outstanding common stock as of March 28, 2014.31, 2017. As such, affiliates of Sun Capital will, for the foreseeable future, have significant influence over our reporting and corporate management and affairs, and will be able to control virtually all matters requiring stockholder approval. For so long as affiliates of Sun Capital own 30% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, Sun Cardinal, LLC, an affiliate of Sun Capital, will have the right to designate a majority of our board of directors. For so long as affiliates of Sun Capital have the right to designate a majority of our board of directors, the directors designated by affiliates of Sun Capital are expected to constitute a majority of each

committee of our board of directors, other than the Audit Committee, and the chairman of each of the committees, other than the Audit Committee, is expected to be a director serving on such committee who is designated by affiliates of Sun Capital, provided that, at such time as we are not a “controlled

21


“controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards, our committee membership will comply with all applicable requirements of those standards and a majority of our board of directors will be “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the NYSE (subject to applicable phase-in rules).

As a “controlled company,” the rules of the NYSE exempt us from the obligation to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that a majority of our board of directors consists of “independent directors,” as defined under such rules, and that we have nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees that are each composed entirely of independent directors. These exemptions do not modify the requirement for a fully independent audit committee, which is permitted to be phased-in as follows: (1) one independent committee member at the time of listing; (2) a majority of independent committee members within 90 days of our initial public offering; and (3) all independent committee members within one year of our initial public offering.we have. Similarly, once we are no longer a “controlled company,” we must comply with the independent board committee requirements as they relate to the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees, on the same phase-in schedulewhich are permitted to be phased-in as set forth above, with the trigger date beingfollows: (1) one independent committee member on the date we are no longercease to be a “controlled company”.; (2) a majority of independent committee members within 90 days of such date; and (3) all independent committee members within one year of such date. Additionally, we will have 12 months from the date we cease to be a “controlled company” to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors.

Affiliates of Sun Capital control actions to be taken by us, and our board of directors and our stockholders, including amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and approval of significant corporate transactions, including mergers and sales of substantially all of our assets. The directors designated by affiliates of Sun Capital have the authority, subject to the terms of our indebtedness and the rules and regulations of the NYSE, to issue additional stock, implement stock repurchase programs, declare dividends and make other decisions. The NYSE independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who meet the independence standard are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of “corporate opportunity” does not apply against Sun Capital or its affiliates, or any of our directors who are associates of, or affiliated with, Sun Capital, in a manner that would prohibit them from investing in competing businesses or doing business with our partners or customers. It is possible that the interests of Sun Capital and its affiliates may in some circumstances conflict with our interests and the interests of our other stockholders, including you.you. For example, Sun Capital may have different tax positions from other stockholders which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when we should dispose of assets, whether and when we should incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, especially in light of the existence of the Tax Receivable Agreement, and whether and when we should terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement and accelerate our obligations thereunder. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration tax or other considerations of Sun Capital and its affiliates even where no similar benefit would accrue to us. See “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” of“Tax Receivable Agreement” under Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

We are a holding company and we are dependent upon distributions from our subsidiaries to pay dividends, and taxes and other expenses.

Vince Holding Corp. is a holding company with no material assets other than its ownership of membership interests in Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, a holding company that has no material assets other than its interest in Vince, LLC.LLC and its foreign subsidiaries. In addition, Vince Holding Corp. holds the remaining proceeds from the Rights Offering. Neither Vince Holding Corp. nor Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC have any independent means of generating revenue. To the extent that we need funds, for a cash dividend to holders of our common stock or otherwise, and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC or Vince, LLC is restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.

We file consolidated income tax returns on behalf of Vince Holding Corp. and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC. Most of our future tax obligations will likely be attributed to the operations of Vince, LLC. Accordingly,

most of the payments against the Tax Receivable Agreement will be attributed to the operations of Vince, LLC. We intend to cause Vince, LLC to pay dividendsdistributions or make funds available to us in an amount sufficient to allow us to pay our taxes and any payments due to certain of our stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement. If, as a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we do not have sufficient funds to pay tax or other liabilities, we may have to borrow funds and thus our liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. To the extent that we are unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest at a default rate of one-year LIBOR plus 500 basis points until paid. See “Tax Receivable Agreement” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” ofNote 12 “Related Party Transactions” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement.

Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could delay and discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider to be favorable.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our companyCompany more difficult without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions include:

the classification of our board of directors so that not all members of our board of directors are elected at one time;

22


the authorization of the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;

stockholder action can only be taken at a special or regular meeting and not by written consent following the time that Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own a majority of our common stock;

advance notice procedures for nominating candidates to our board of directors or presenting matters at stockholder meetings;

removal of directors only for cause following the time that Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own a majority of our common stock;

allowing Sun Cardinal to fill any vacancy on our board of directors for so long as affiliates of Sun Capital own 30% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock and thereafter, allowing only our board of directors to fill vacancies on our board of directors; and

following the time that Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own a majority of our common stock, super-majority voting requirements to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also contains a provision that provides us with protections similar to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), and prevents us from engaging in a business combination, such as a merger, with a person or group who acquires at least 15% of our voting stock for a period of three years from the date such person became an interested stockholder, unless board or stockholder approval is obtained prior to acquisition. However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides that both Sun Capital and its affiliates and any persons to whom a Sun Capital affiliate sells its common stock will be deemed to have been approved by our board of directors.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change of control of our company,Company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.

Any issuance of preferred stock could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our common stock, which could depress the price of our common stock.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the rights of our common stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the market price, and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.

We are an “emerging growth company” and have elected to comply with reduced public company reporting requirements, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined by the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we have chosen to take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements. These exemptions include, but are not limited to, (i) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements, and (iii) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years after the first sale of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), which such fifth anniversary will occur in 2018. However, if certain events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, including if we become a “large accelerated filer,” our annual gross revenues exceed $1.0 billion or we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period, we would cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period. We will become a large accelerated filer the year after we have an aggregate worldwide market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more. We have taken advantage of certain of the reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in this annual report on Form 10-K and may elect to take advantage of other reduced burdens in future filings. As a result, the information we provide to holders of our common stock may be different than you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any choice we make to reduce disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and the price for our common stock may be more volatile.

As an emerging growth company we are not required to comply with the rules of the SEC implementing Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and therefore our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting until the year following the year we cease to be an emerging growth company. We are required, however, to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 302 and 404 other than 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. Though we are required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis, we are not required to make our first annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until we file the annual report for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 (fiscal 2014). If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report as and when required by Section 404 or we are required to restate our financial statements, we may fail to meet our public reporting obligations and investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative impact on the trading price of our stock.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, we have irrevocably elected not to avail

ourselves of this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the sole and exclusive forum for any of the following: any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are an “emerging growth company” and have elected to comply with reduced public company reporting requirements, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we have chosen to take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements. These exemptions include, but are not limited to, (i) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements, and (iii) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years after the first sale of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act which such fifth anniversary will occur in 2018. However, if certain events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, including if we become a “large accelerated filer,” our annual gross revenues exceed $1.0 billion or we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period, we would cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period. We will become a large accelerated filer the year after we have an aggregate worldwide market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more. We have taken advantage of certain of the reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in certain of our reports filed with the SEC and may elect to take advantage of other reduced burdens in future filings. As a result, the information we provide to holders of our common stock may be different than you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any choice we make to reduce disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and the price for our common stock may be more volatile.

23


As an emerging growth company we are not required to comply with the rules of the SEC implementing Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and therefore our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting until the fiscal year after the fiscal year we cease to be an emerging growth company. We are required, however, to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 302 and 404 other than 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report as and when required by Section 404 or we are required to restate our financial statements, we may fail to meet our public reporting obligations and investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative impact on the trading price of our stock.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. However, we have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

PROPERTIES.

We do not own any real estate. Our 16,283-square-foot33,009 square-foot principal executive and administrative offices are located at 1441 Broadway, 6th Floor,500 Fifth Avenue, 19th and 20th Floors, New York, New York 1001810110 and are leased under an agreement expiring in December 2014. Our 5,900-square-foot showroom isApril 2025. We also lease a 28,541 square-foot design studio located at 80 W. 40th Street, New York, New York 10018900 N. Cahuenga Blvd., Los Angeles, California under an agreement expiring in July 2020 and is leaseda 4,209 square-foot showroom space in Paris, France under an agreement expiring in December 2017. Our 17,640 square-foot design studios are located at 5410 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California and are leased under an agreement expiring in January 2015. In January 2014, we signed a lease for office space at 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, and expect to consolidate our New York offices into one location by the end of fiscal 2014.2020.

As of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, we leased approximately 56,855127,804 gross square feet related to our 2854 company-operated retail stores. Our leases generally have initial terms of 10 years and cannot be extended or can be extended for one additional5-year term. OurSubstantially all of our leases require a fixed annual rent, and most require the payment of additional rent if store sales exceed a negotiated amount. Most of our leases are “net” leases, which require us to pay all of the cost of insurance, taxes, maintenance and utilities. Although we generally cannot cancel these leases at our option, certain of our leases allow us, and in some cases, the lessor, to terminate the lease if we do not achieve a specified gross sales threshold.

The following store list shows the location, opening date, type and size of our company-operated retail locations as of February 1, 2014:January 28, 2017:

 

Vince Location

  State  Opening Date  Type   Gross Square
Feet
   Selling Square
Feet
 

Robertson (Los Angeles)

  CA  April 9, 2008   Street     1,151     938  

Melrose (Los Angeles)

  CA  September 4, 2008   Street     1,537     1,385  

Washington St. (Meatpacking)

  NY  February 3, 2009   Street     2,000     1,239  

Prince St. (Nolita)

  NY  July 25, 2009   Street     1,396     1,108  

San Francisco

  CA  October 15, 2009   Street     1,895     1,408  

Chicago

  IL  October 1, 2010   Street     2,590     1,371  

Madison Ave.

  NY  August 3, 2012   Street     3,503     1,928  

Westport

  CT  March 28, 2013   Street     1,801     1,344  

Greenwich

  CT  July 19, 2013   Street     2,463     1,724  

Mercer St. (Soho)

  NY  August 22, 2013   Street     4,500     3,080  

Columbus Ave (Upper West Side)

  NY  December 18, 2013   Street     4,465     3,126  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Street (11):

         27,301     18,651  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Malibu

  CA  August 9, 2009   Mall     797     705  

Dallas

  TX  August 28, 2009   Mall     1,368     1,182  

Boca Raton

  FL  October 13, 2009   Mall     1,547     1,199  

Boston

  MA  October 20, 2009   Mall     1,370     1,015  

White Plains

  NY  November 6, 2009   Mall     1,325     1,045  

Atlanta

  GA  April 16, 2010   Mall     1,643     1,356  

Palo Alto

  CA  September 17, 2010   Mall     2,028     1,391  

Bellevue Square

  WA  November 5, 2010   Mall     1,460     1,113  

Manhasset

  NY  April 22, 2011   Mall     1,414     1,000  

Newport Beach

  CA  May 20, 2011   Mall     1,656     1,242  

The Grove

  CA  November 20, 2012   Mall     1,862     1,160  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Mall and Lifestyle Centers (11):

         16,470     12,408  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Full-Price (22):

         43,771     31,059  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Orlando

  FL  July 17, 2009   Outlet     2,065     1,165  

Cabazon

  CA  November 11, 2011   Outlet     2,066     1,118  

Riverhead

  NY  November 30, 2012   Outlet     2,100     1,490  

Chicago

  IL  August 1, 2013   Outlet     2,611     1,828  

Seattle

  WA  August 30, 2013   Outlet     2,214     1,550  

Las Vegas

  NV  October 3, 2013   Outlet     2,028     1,420  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Outlets (6):

         13,084     8,571  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total (28):

         56,855     39,630  
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Vince Location

 

State

 

Opening Date

 

Type

 

Gross Square Feet

 

 

Selling Square Feet

 

Robertson (Los Angeles)

 

CA

 

April 9, 2008

 

Street

 

 

1,151

 

 

 

938

 

Melrose (Los Angeles)

 

CA

 

September 4, 2008

 

Street

 

 

1,537

 

 

 

1,385

 

Washington St. (Meatpacking - Women's)

 

NY

 

February 3, 2009

 

Street

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

1,600

 

Prince St. (Nolita)

 

NY

 

July 25, 2009

 

Street

 

 

1,396

 

 

 

1,108

 

San Francisco

 

CA

 

October 15, 2009

 

Street

 

 

1,895

 

 

 

1,408

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

October 1, 2010

 

Street

 

 

2,590

 

 

 

1,371

 

Madison Ave.

 

NY

 

August 3, 2012

 

Street

 

 

3,503

 

 

 

1,928

 

Westport

 

CT

 

March 28, 2013

 

Street

 

 

1,801

 

 

 

1,344

 

Greenwich

 

CT

 

July 19, 2013

 

Street

 

 

2,463

 

 

 

1,724

 

Mercer St. (Soho)

 

NY

 

August 22, 2013

 

Street

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

3,080

 

Columbus Ave. (Upper West Side)

 

NY

 

December 18, 2013

 

Street

 

 

4,465

 

 

 

3,126

 

Washington St. (Meatpacking - Men's)

 

NY

 

June 2, 2014

 

Street

 

 

1,827

 

 

 

1,027

 

Newbury St. (Boston)

 

MA

 

May 24, 2014

 

Street

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

3,100

 

Pasadena

 

CA

 

August 7, 2014

 

Street

 

 

3,475

 

 

 

2,200

 

Walnut St. (Philadelphia)

 

PA

 

August 4, 2014

 

Street

 

 

3,250

 

 

 

2,000

 

Abott Kiney (Los Angeles)

 

CA

 

September 26, 2015

 

Street

 

 

1,990

 

 

 

1,815

 

Total Street (16):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,967

 

 

 

29,154

 

Malibu

 

CA

 

August 9, 2009

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

797

 

 

 

705

 

Dallas

 

TX

 

August 28, 2009

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

1,368

 

 

 

1,182

 

Boca Raton

 

FL

 

October 13, 2009

 

Mall

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

1,199

 

Copley Place (Boston)

 

MA

 

October 20, 2009

 

Mall

 

 

1,370

 

 

 

1,015

 

White Plains

 

NY

 

November 6, 2009

 

Mall

 

 

1,325

 

 

 

1,045

 

Atlanta

 

GA

 

April 16, 2010

 

Mall

 

 

1,643

 

 

 

1,356

 

24


Vince Location

 

State

 

Opening Date

 

Type

 

Gross Square Feet

 

 

Selling Square Feet

 

Palo Alto

 

CA

 

September 17, 2010

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,028

 

 

 

1,391

 

Bellevue Square

 

WA

 

November 5, 2010

 

Mall

 

 

1,460

 

 

 

1,113

 

Manhasset (Long Island)

 

NY

 

April 22, 2011

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

1,414

 

 

 

1,000

 

Newport Beach

 

CA

 

May 20, 2011

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

1,656

 

 

 

1,242

 

Bal Harbour

 

FL

 

October 4, 2014

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,600

 

 

 

1,820

 

Chestnut Hill

 

MA

 

July 25, 2014

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,357

 

 

 

1,886

 

Brookfield (Downtown)

 

NY

 

March 26, 2015

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,966

 

 

 

2,373

 

Merrick Park (Coral Gables)

 

FL

 

April 30, 2015

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,512

 

 

 

1,871

 

Washington D.C. City Center

 

DC

 

April 30, 2015

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

3,202

 

 

 

2,562

 

Scottsdale Quarter

 

AZ

 

May 15, 2015

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,753

 

 

 

2,200

 

Houston

 

TX

 

October 1, 2015

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,998

 

 

 

2,398

 

Westlake Village

 

CA

 

February 26, 2016

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,520

 

 

 

2,016

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

April 1, 2016

 

Mall

 

 

3,220

 

 

 

2,576

 

Tyson's Galleria (McLean)

 

VA

 

April 29, 2016

 

Mall

 

 

2,668

 

 

 

2,134

 

The Grove

 

CA

 

May 23, 2016

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,717

 

 

 

2,174

 

Troy

 

MI

 

May 27, 2016

 

Mall

 

 

2,700

 

 

 

2,160

 

King of Prussia

 

PA

 

August 18, 2016

 

Mall

 

 

2,600

 

 

 

2,080

 

San Diego (Fashion Valley)

 

CA

 

August 25, 2016

 

Lifestyle Center

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

2,254

 

Total Mall and Lifestyle Centers (24)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,238

 

 

 

41,752

 

Total Full-Price (40)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,205

 

 

 

70,906

 

Orlando

 

FL

 

June 17, 2009

 

Outlet

 

 

2,065

 

 

 

1,446

 

Cabazon

 

CA

 

November 11, 2011

 

Outlet

 

 

2,066

 

 

 

1,653

 

Riverhead

 

NY

 

November 30, 2012

 

Outlet

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

1,490

 

Chicago

 

IL

 

August 1, 2013

 

Outlet

 

 

2,611

 

 

 

1,828

 

Seattle

 

WA

 

August 30, 2013

 

Outlet

 

 

2,214

 

 

 

1,550

 

Las Vegas

 

NV

 

October 3, 2013

 

Outlet

 

 

2,028

 

 

 

1,420

 

San Marcos

 

TX

 

October 10, 2014

 

Outlet

 

 

2,433

 

 

 

1,703

 

Carlsbad

 

CA

 

October 24, 2014

 

Outlet

 

 

2,453

 

 

 

1,717

 

Wrentham

 

MA

 

September 29, 2014

 

Outlet

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

1,400

 

Camarillo

 

CA

 

February 1, 2015

 

Outlet

 

 

3,001

 

 

 

2,101

 

Livermore

 

CA

 

August 13, 2015

 

Outlet

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

1,767

 

Chicago Premium

 

IL

 

August 27, 2015

 

Outlet

 

 

2,300

 

 

 

1,840

 

Woodbury Commons

 

NY

 

November 6, 2015

 

Outlet

 

 

2,289

 

 

 

1,831

 

Sawgrass

 

FL

 

December 4, 2015

 

Outlet

 

 

2,539

 

 

 

1,771

 

Total Outlets (14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,599

 

 

 

23,517

 

Total (54)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127,804

 

 

 

94,423

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are subjecta party to various legal proceedings, compliance matters and environmental claims whichthat arise in the ordinary course of our business. AlthoughWe are not currently a party to any legal proceedings, compliance investigations or environmental claims that we believe would, individually or in the outcome of these and other claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters willaggregate have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,position, results of operations or cash flows, or results of operation.although these proceedings and claims are subject to inherent uncertainties.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

25


PartPART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.Market Information

Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “VNCE” since November 22, 2013. Prior to that time there was no public market for our stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange:

Market Information

 

 

Market Price

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

Fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

8.11

 

 

$

4.14

 

Second quarter

 

$

6.75

 

 

$

4.81

 

Third quarter

 

$

7.17

 

 

$

4.60

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

5.50

 

 

$

2.90

 

Fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

25.30

 

 

$

16.50

 

Second quarter

 

$

18.86

 

 

$

9.46

 

Third quarter

 

$

9.80

 

 

$

3.31

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

7.06

 

 

$

3.49

 

 

Fiscal 2013

  High   Low 

Fourth Quarter (since November 22, 2013)

  $32.76    $22.53  

Record Holders

As of March 28, 201431, 2017 there were 53 holders of record holders of our common stock.

Dividends

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends depends on our receipt of cash dividendsdistributions from our subsidiaries. The terms of our indebtedness substantially restrict the ability to pay dividends. See “Existing Credit Facilities and Debt as of February 1, 2014 (Post IPO and Restructuring Transactions)” under “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”Financing Activities” of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the related restrictions.

Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions contained in current and future financing instruments and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.

Unregistered SalesPerformance Graph

The following graph shows a monthly comparison of Equity Securities

On October 3, 2013, David Falwell, Kellwood Company and VHC entered into an Option Settlement Agreement (the “Option Settlement Agreement”). Mr. Falwell previously heldthe cumulative total return on a vested and exercisable option to acquire 57,035 shares of non-voting Kellwood Company$100 investment in the Company’s common stock, under the 2010 Option PlanStandard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and a grant agreement dated August 11, 2011 (the “Falwell Option”). Pursuant to the Option Settlement Agreement, when Mr. Falwell exercisedStandard & Poor’s Retail Select Industry Index. The cumulative total return for the Option, he received 52,422 non-voting sharesVince Holding Corp. common stock assumes an initial investment of $100 in the common stock of VHC from Kellwoodthe Company on November 22, 2013, which was the Company’s first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange after its IPO. The cumulative total returns for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poor’s Retail Select Industry Index assume an initial investment of $100 on October 31, 2013. The comparison also assumes the reinvestment of any dividends. The stock price performance included in lieuthis graph is not necessarily indicative of 57,035 shares of non-voting commonfuture stock of Kellwood Company. Kellwood Company received $127,897 from Mr. Falwell in connectionprice performance.

26


This performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the exercise of the Falwell Option. VHC received no monetary proceeds from the exercise of the Falwell Option, and instead received 57,035 shares of non-voting stock of Kellwood Company in return for the issuance of the 52,422 non-voting shares of VHC common stock to Kellwood Company. The shares of non-voting common stock of VHC were issued to Kellwood Company pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) ofSEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act.

ExceptAct of 1933, as set forth above inamended, or the immediately preceding paragraph, we did not sell any unregistered securities from January 29, 2011 through February 1, 2014.

UseSecurities Exchange Act of Proceeds

On November 21, 2013, our registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333- 191336) was declared effective for the IPO, pursuant to which we registered the offering and sale of 11,500,000 shares of our common stock, including 1,500,000 additional shares pursuant1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) except to the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares

from the selling stockholders, at a public offering price of $20.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $200 million to us (with respect to the 10,000,000 shares of common stock soldextent we specifically incorporate it by us in the offering). Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated acted as joint book-running managers of the offering and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC acted as joint bookrunning managers in the offering.

As a result of the offering, we received net proceeds of approximately $177.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions (with respect to the 10,000,000 primary shares) of approximately $14.0 million and offering expenses of approximately $9.0 million. None ofreference into such payments were direct or indirect payments to any of our affiliates or to our directors or officers or their associates or to persons owning 10% or more of our common stock.

We used $172 million of the net proceeds from the offering, along with $169.5 million of net borrowings under the Term Loan Facility, to repay the $341.5 million Kellwood Note Receivable. The remaining $5.0 million of the net proceeds from the offering were used for general corporate purposes.filing.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the three months ended FebruaryJanuary 28, 2017.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On March 15, 2016, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with Sun Cardinal, LLC and SCSF Cardinal, LLC, affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. (collectively the “Investors”) pursuant to which the Investors agreed to backstop a rights offering by purchasing at the subscription price of $5.50 per share any and all shares not subscribed through the exercise of rights, including the over-subscription. See Note 1 2014.

“Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” within the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the rights offering. Simultaneous with the closing of the rights offering, on April 22, 2016, the Company received $1.1 million of proceeds from the related Investment Agreement and issued to the Investors 195,663 shares of its common stock in connection therewith. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds, which funds are held by Vince Holding Corp. until needed by its operating subsidiary, for additional strategic investments and general corporate purposes, which may include future amounts owed by the Company under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The shares issued to the Investors pursuant to the Investment Agreement were sold in reliance on the exemption set forth in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.27


ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected historical consolidated financial data set forth below for each of the years in the three-yearfive-year period ended February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 and as of February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.statements.

The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any future period. The information should be read in conjunction with “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included herein.

 

   Fiscal Year(1) 
(In thousands, except for share data, percentages and store counts)  2013  2012  2011 

Statement of Operations Data:

    

Net sales

  $288,170   $240,352   $175,255  

Cost of products sold

   155,154    132,156    89,545  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   133,016    108,196    85,710  

Selling, general and administrative expenses (2)

   83,663    67,260    42,793  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   49,353    40,936    42,917  

Interest expense, net (3)

   18,011    68,684    81,364  

Other expense, net

   679    769    478  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   30,663    (28,517  (38,925

Provision for Income taxes

   7,268    1,178    2,997  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   23,395    (29,695  (41,922

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (50,815  (78,014  (105,944
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(27,420 $(107,709 $(147,866
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

    

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83   $(1.13 $(1.60

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (1.81  (2.98  (4.04
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(0.98 $(4.11 $(5.64
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

    

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83   $(1.13 $(1.60

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (1.81  (2.98  (4.04
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(0.98 $(4.11 $(5.64
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   28,119,794    26,211,130    26,211,130  

Diluted

   28,272,925    26,211,130    26,211,130  
   As of 
   February 1,
2014
  February 2,
2013
  January 28,
2012
 

Balance Sheet Data:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $21,484    $317    $1,839  

Working capital

   65,398    9,746    (2,149

Total assets

   414,342    442,124    468,445  

Long-term debt

   170,000    391,434    605,292  

Other liabilities (long-term)(4)

   169,015    —      —    

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   33,551    (561,265  (743,021

   Fiscal Year(1) 
(In thousands, except for share data, percentages and store counts)  2013  2012  2011 

Other Operating and Financial Data:

    

Net Sales By Segment:

    

Wholesale

  $229,114   $203,107   $151,921  

Direct-to-consumer

   59,056    37,245    23,334  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Net sales

  $288,170   $240,352   $175,255  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total wholesale doors at end of period

   2,300    2,145    1,761  

Total stores at end of period

   28    22    19  

Comparable store sales growth (5)

   20.6  20.8  7.6

Depreciation and amortization

  $2,785   $2,009   $1,701  

Capital expenditures

  $10,073   $1,821   $1,450  

 

 

Fiscal Year (1)

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(in thousands, except for share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

268,199

 

 

$

302,457

 

 

$

340,396

 

 

$

288,170

 

 

$

240,352

 

Gross profit (2)

 

 

122,819

 

 

 

132,516

 

 

 

166,829

 

 

 

133,016

 

 

 

108,196

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (3)

 

 

134,430

 

 

 

116,790

 

 

 

96,579

 

 

 

83,663

 

 

 

67,260

 

(Loss) income from operations (4)

 

 

(64,672

)

 

 

15,726

 

 

 

70,250

 

 

 

49,353

 

 

 

40,936

 

Net (loss) income from continuing operations (4) (5)

 

 

(162,659

)

 

 

5,099

 

 

 

35,723

 

 

 

23,395

 

 

 

(29,695

)

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(50,815

)

 

 

(78,014

)

Net (loss) income (4) (5)

 

 

(162,659

)

 

 

5,099

 

 

 

35,723

 

 

 

(27,420

)

 

 

(107,709

)

Basic (loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations

 

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.97

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

(1.13

)

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.97

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(4.11

)

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations

 

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.93

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

(1.13

)

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.93

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(4.11

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

36,770,430

 

 

 

36,730,490

 

 

 

28,119,794

 

 

 

26,211,130

 

Diluted

 

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

37,529,227

 

 

 

38,244,906

 

 

 

28,272,925

 

 

 

26,211,130

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

 

January 28, 2017

 

 

January 30, 2016

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

 

February 1, 2014

 

 

February 2, 2013

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

20,978

 

 

$

6,230

 

 

$

112

 

 

$

21,484

 

 

$

317

 

Working capital

 

 

24,170

 

 

 

(11,415

)

 

 

16,650

 

 

 

65,398

 

 

 

9,746

 

Total assets

 

 

239,480

 

 

 

363,568

 

 

 

378,648

 

 

 

409,374

 

 

 

442,124

 

Debt principal

 

 

50,200

 

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

88,000

 

 

 

170,000

 

 

 

391,434

 

Other liabilities (long-term) (7)

 

 

137,830

 

 

 

140,838

 

 

 

146,063

 

 

 

169,015

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' (deficit) equity

 

 

(13,981

)

 

 

78,502

 

 

 

71,969

 

 

 

33,551

 

 

 

(561,265

)

 

 

Fiscal Year (1)

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Other Operating and Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wholesale doors at end of period

 

 

2,260

 

 

 

2,441

 

 

 

2,394

 

 

 

2,300

 

 

 

2,145

 

Total company-operated stores at end of period

 

 

54

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

22

 

Comparable sales (8) (9)

 

 

-16.2

%

 

 

4.2

%

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

25.2

%

 

 

35.9

%

(1)

Fiscal year ends on Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal 2016 (ended January 28, 2017), Fiscal 2015 (ended January 30, 2016), Fiscal 2014 (ended January 31, 2015) and Fiscal 2013 (ended February 1, 2014) consisted of 52 weeks. Fiscal 2012 (ended February 2, 2013) consisted of 53 weeks.

(2)

Fiscal 2015 includes the impact of $10,300 pre-tax expense associated with inventory write-downs primarily related to excess out of season and current inventory.

(3)

Fiscal 2016 includes the impact of a $2,082 non-cash asset impairment charge related to the assets of certain retail stores with asset carrying values that were determined not to be recoverable and exceeded fair value. Fiscal 2015 includes the net impact of

28


$2,702 pre-tax expense associated with executive severance costs and executive search costs partly offset by the favorable impact of executive stock option forfeitures. Fiscal 2014 includes $571 pre-tax expense associated with the secondary offering by certain stockholders of the Company completed in July 2014. Fiscal 2013 (ended February 1, 2014) and Fiscal 2011 (ended January 28, 2012) consisted of 52 weeks.

(2)Includes2012 include $9,751 and $9,331, respectively, pre-tax expense associated with the impact of public company transition costscosts.

(4)

Fiscal 2016 includes the impact of approximately $9,751, $9,331a pre-tax impairment charges of $22,311 related to goodwill and $0$30,750 related to the tradename intangible asset. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details.

(3)

(5)

Interest expense prior

Fiscal 2016 includes the impact of a $121,836 valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. See Note 10 “Income Taxes” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details.

(6)

Prior to the Company’s IPO in November 2013 is associated withand Restructuring Transactions, the Sun Promissory and Sun Capital Loan agreements. Interest expense afterCompany was a diversified apparel company operating a broad portfolio of fashion brands, which included the Vince business. As a result of the IPO inand Restructuring Transactions, the non-Vince businesses were separated from the Vince business, and the stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions retained the full ownership and control of the non-Vince businesses. The Vince business is now the sole operating business of Vince Holding Corp. Historical financial information for the non-Vince businesses is presented as a component of discontinued operations, until the businesses were separated on November 2013 represents interest and amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the Company’s new $175,000 Term Loan facility. Annualized interest expense under the Term Loan facility, before consideration of any debt principal payments, is approximately $11,600.27, 2013.

(4)

(7)

Other liabilities includes the impact of recording the long-term portion of the liability related to the Tax Receivable Agreement, with the Pre-IPO Stockholders entered into in November 2013, which represents our obligation to pay 85% of estimated cash savings on federal, state and local income taxes realized by us through our use of certain net tax assets retained by us subsequent to the completion of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions executed in November 2013.

(5)

(8)

Comparable sales include our e-commerce sales in order to align with how we manage our brick-and-mortar retail stores and e-commerce online store as a combined single direct-to-consumer segment. As a result of our omni-channel sales includesand inventory strategy as well as cross-channel customer shopping patterns, there is less distinction between our brick-and-mortar retail stores and our e-commerce online store and we believe the inclusion of e-commerce sales at stores open at least twelve months onin our comparable sales metric is a 52 week basis.more meaningful representation of these results and provides a more comprehensive view of our year over year comparable sales metric.

(9)

A store is included in the comparable sales calculation after it has completed 13 full fiscal months of operations. Non-comparable sales include new stores which have not completed 13 full fiscal months of operations and sales from closed stores. In the event that we relocate or change square footage of an existing store, we would treat that store as non-comparable until it has completed 13 full fiscal months of operations following the relocation or square footage adjustment. For 53-week fiscal years, we adjust comparable sales to exclude the additional week. There may be variations in the way in which some of our competitors and other retailers calculate comparable sales.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This discussion summarizes our consolidated operating results, financial condition and liquidity during each of the years in the three-year period ended February 1, 2014. 29


ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 ended on February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013January 28, 2017 (“fiscal 2016”), January 30, 2016 (“fiscal 2015”) and January 28, 2012,31, 2015 (“fiscal 2014”), respectively. Fiscal years 20132016, 2015 and 20112014 each consisted of 52 weeks and Fiscal 2012 consisted of 53 weeks. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K. All amounts disclosed are in thousands except door and store counts, countries, share and per share data and percentages.

OnFor purposes of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Vince,” the “Company,” “we,” and “our,” refer to Vince Holding Corp. (“VHC”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC (“Vince Intermediate”) and Vince, LLC. References to “Kellwood” refer, as applicable, to Kellwood Holding, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries (including Kellwood Company, LLC) or the operations of the non-Vince businesses after giving effect to the Restructuring Transactions that were completed in connection with our IPO on November 27, 2013 Vince Holding Corp. completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of common stock and completed a series of Restructuring Transactions which occurred immediately prior to the IPO. As a result of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the non-Vince businesses were separated from the Vince business. The Vince business is now the sole operating business of Vince Holding Corp. Historical financial information for the non-Vince businesses has been included as discontinued operations until the businesses were separated on November 27, 2013.Kellwood Sale.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements involving risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our results to differ materially from expectations. Factors that might cause such differences include those described underFor a discussion of the risks facing our business, see “Item 1A—Risk Factors,” “Disclosures Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhereFactors” included in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Overview

Established in 2002, Vince is a prominent, high-growth contemporary fashionglobal luxury brand best known for utilizing luxe fabrications and innovative techniques to create a product assortment that combines urban utility and modern effortless stylestyle. From its edited core collection of ultra-soft cashmere knits and everyday luxury essentials. Founded in 2002,cotton tees, Vince has generated strongevolved into a global lifestyle brand and destination for both women’s and men’s apparel and accessories. Vince products are sold in prestige distribution worldwide, including approximately 2,300 distribution locations across more than 40 countries. While we have experienced a decline in sales, momentum over the last decade. Wewe believe that we will achieve continued successcan generate growth by improving and expanding our product assortment distributed through premier wholesale partners in the U.S. and selectoffering, expanding our selling into additional international markets, as well as inand growing our own branded retail locations and on our e-commerce platform.

As of February 1, 2014, we sold our products through 2,300 doors through our wholesale partners in the U.S. and international markets and we operated 28 retail stores, including 22 full price stores and six outlet stores, throughout the United States.

The following is a summary of Fiscal 2013 highlights:

We completed the IPO of our common stock and realized net proceeds of approximately $177 million and we entered into a new $175 million Term Loan Facility in November 2013.

Certain proceeds from the above were used to pay down the Kellwood Note Receivable with Kellwood Company and the Vince and Non-Vince businesses were separated in a series of Restructuring Transactions completed on November 27, 2013. Proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable were used to repay or discharge certain existing debt of Kellwood Company.

In June 2013 certain indebtedness and interest owed to certain affiliates of Sun Capital were contributed to the Company and resulted in a capital contribution of approximately $407.5 million.

In November 2013, we entered into a new Revolving Credit Facility that provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $50 million.

We entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood Company LLC which provides support services to us in various operational areas including, among other things, distribution, logistics, information technology, accounts payable, credit and collections, and payroll and benefits.

We entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders whereby we will pay an amount equal to 85% of the aggregate reduction in taxes payable by us from the utilization of certain tax benefits that existed at the time of the IPO.

We made a pre-payment of $5 million on the Term Loan Facility in January 2014. As of February 1, 2014 we had $170 million of debt outstanding.

Our net sales totaled $288.2 million, reflecting a 19.9% increase over prior year net sales of $240.4 million.

Our wholesale net sales increased 12.8% to $229.1 million and our direct-to-consumer net sales increased 58.6% to $59.1 million.

businesses.

Operating income increased 20.6% to $49.4 million, or 17.1% of net sales.

We opened six net new retail stores during Fiscal 2013.

We serve our customers through a variety of channels that reinforce the Vince brand image. Our diversified channel strategy allows us to introduce our products to customers through multiple distribution points that are reported in two segments: Wholesale and Direct-to-consumer.

As of January 28, 2017, our products were sold at 2,260 doors through our wholesale partners in the U.S. and direct-to-consumer. international markets and we operated 54 retail stores, including 40 full price stores and 14 outlet stores, throughout the United States.

The following is a summary of ourfiscal 2016 highlights:

Our net sales totaled $268,199, reflecting an 11.3% decrease compared to prior year net sales of $302,457.

Our Wholesale net sales decreased 15.5% to $170,053 and our Direct-to-consumer net sales for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012decreased 3.1% to $98,146. Comparable store sales including e-commerce decreased 16.2% compared to last year.

We continue to incur costs associated with certain strategic investments within Cost of products sold and Fiscal 2011:

   2013   2012   2011 

Net Sales By Segment:

      

Wholesale

  $229,114    $203,107    $151,921  

Direct-to-consumer

   59,056     37,245     23,334  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Net sales

  $288,170    $240,352    $175,255  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

We have expanded our operations rapidly since our inception in 2002, and we have limited operating experience at our current size. Our growth in net sales has also led to increased selling,Selling, general and administrative expenses. We have made and are making investments to support our near and longer-term growth. If our operations continue to grow over the longer term, of which there can be no assurance, we will be required to expand our sales and marketing, product development and distribution functions, to upgrade our management information systems and other processes, and to obtain more space for our expanding administrative support and other headquarters personnel.

Whileexpenses that we believe will facilitate achieving our growth strategy offers significant opportunities, it also presents risks and challenges, including among others,long-term goals. We incurred charges of $6,950 during fiscal 2016 related to (i) the risks that we may not be able to hire and train qualified associates, that our new product offerings and expanded sales channels may not maintain or enhance our brand image and thatmigration of our distribution facilities to a new third-party service provider; (ii) the realignment of our supplier base; (iii) the transition of information technology systems and information systems may not be adequateinfrastructure in-house from Kellwood; (iv) the estimated impact of our strategic decision regarding handbags; and (v) our brand update initiatives.

Our net loss was $162,659, or $3.50 per share, compared to supportnet income of $5,009, or $0.14 per diluted share, in the prior year. Net loss in the current year included pre-tax impairment charges of $53,061 related to goodwill and our growth plans. Forindefinite-lived tradename intangible asset and a $121,836 valuation allowance established against our deferred tax assets. Net income in the prior year included pre-tax expense of $10,300 associated with inventory write-downs primarily related to excess out of season and current inventory, pre-tax expense of $3,394 of executive severance costs, pre-tax expense of $615 associated with executive search costs and pre-tax income of $1,307 related to executive stock option forfeitures.

We opened 6 new retail stores during fiscal 2016.

As of January 28, 2017, we had $50,200 of total debt principal outstanding comprised of $45,000 outstanding under our Term Loan Facility and $5,200 outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility, as well as $20,978 of cash and cash equivalents.

We continued to invest in infrastructure related to our IT migration efforts which were completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

30


Results of Operations

Comparable Sales

Comparable sales include our e-commerce sales in order to align with how we manage our brick-and-mortar retail stores and e-commerce online store as a combined single Direct-to-consumer segment. As a result of our omni-channel sales and inventory strategy, as well as cross-channel customer shopping patterns, there is less distinction between our brick-and-mortar retail stores and our e-commerce online store and we believe the inclusion of e-commerce sales in our comparable sales metric is a more complete discussionsmeaningful representation of risks facingthese results and provides a more comprehensive view of our business see “Item 1A—Risk Factors”year over year comparable sales metric.

A store is included in the comparable sales calculation after it has completed 13 full fiscal months of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Resultsoperations. Non-comparable sales include new stores which have not completed 13 full fiscal months of Operationsoperations and sales from closed stores. In the event that we relocate or change square footage of an existing store, we would treat that store as non-comparable until it has completed 13 full fiscal months of operations following the relocation or square footage adjustment. For 53-week fiscal years, we adjust comparable sales to exclude the additional week. There may be variations in the way in which some of our competitors and other retailers calculate comparable sales.

Fiscal 20132016 Compared to Fiscal 20122015

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our operating results as a percentage of net sales as well as earnings per share data:

 

   Fiscal Year Ended    
   February 1, 2014  February 2, 2013  Variances 
   Amount  % of Net
Sales
  Amount  % of Net
Sales
  Amount  Percent 

Statements of Operations:

       

Net sales

  $288,170    100.0 $240,352    100.0 $47,818    19.9

Cost of products sold

   155,154    53.8    132,156    55.0    22,998    17.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   133,016    46.2    108,196    45.0    24,820    22.9  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   83,663    29.0    67,260    28.0    16,403    24.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   49,353    17.2    40,936    17.0    8,417    20.6  

Interest expense, net

   18,011    6.3    68,684    28.6    (50,673  (73.8

Other expense, net

   679    0.2    769    0.3    (90  (11.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   30,663    10.7    (28,517  (11.9  59,180    (207.5

Provision for income taxes

   7,268    2.5    1,178    0.5    6,090    516.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   23,395    8.2    (29,695  (12.4  53,090    (178.8

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (50,815  (17.6  (78,014  (32.5  27,199    (34.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(27,420  (9.6)%  $(107,709  (44.8)%  $80,289    (74.5)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

       

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83    $(1.13   

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (1.81   (2.98   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

Net loss

  $(0.98  $(4.11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

       

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83    $(1.13   

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

   (1.81   (2.98   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

Net loss

  $(0.98  $(4.11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

Other Operating and Financial Data:

       

Total wholesale doors at end of period

   2,300     2,145     

Total stores at end of period

   28     22     

Comparable stores growth

   20.6   20.8   

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Variances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

(in thousands, except per share data, store and door counts and percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statements of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

268,199

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

302,457

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

(34,258

)

 

 

(11.3

)%

Cost of products sold

 

 

145,380

 

 

 

54.2

%

 

 

169,941

 

 

 

56.2

%

 

 

(24,561

)

 

 

(14.5

)%

Gross profit

 

 

122,819

 

 

 

45.8

%

 

 

132,516

 

 

 

43.8

%

 

 

(9,697

)

 

 

(7.3

)%

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

 

53,061

 

 

 

19.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

53,061

 

 

 

100.0

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

134,430

 

 

 

50.1

%

 

 

116,790

 

 

 

38.6

%

 

 

17,640

 

 

 

15.1

%

(Loss) income from operations

 

 

(64,672

)

 

 

(24.1

)%

 

 

15,726

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

(80,398

)

 

*

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,932

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

5,680

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

(1,748

)

 

 

(30.8

)%

Other expense, net

 

 

329

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

1,733

 

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

(1,404

)

 

 

(81.0

)%

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(68,933

)

 

 

(25.7

)%

 

 

8,313

 

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

(77,246

)

 

*

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

93,726

 

 

 

34.9

%

 

 

3,214

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

90,512

 

 

*

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(162,659

)

 

 

(60.6

)%

 

$

5,099

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

$

(167,758

)

 

*

 

(Loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(3.50

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(3.50

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Operating and Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wholesale doors at end of period

 

 

2,260

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stores at end of period

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable sales growth

 

 

-16.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(*)

Not meaningful.

Net Salessalesfor the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 were $288.2 million, increasing $47.8 million,$268,199, decreasing $34,258, or 19.9%11.3%, versus $240.4 million$302,457 for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. The increase in2015. Net sales compared to the prior year is due to an increase in volume across both of our business segments.by reportable segment are as follows:

 

  Net Sales by Segment 
  Fiscal Year Ended 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)  February 1, 
2014
   February 2, 
2013
 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Wholesale

  $229,114    $203,107  

 

$

170,053

 

 

$

201,182

 

Direct-to-consumer

   59,056     37,245  

 

 

98,146

 

 

 

101,275

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $288,170    $240,352  
  

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

 

$

268,199

 

 

$

302,457

 

31


Net sales from our wholesaleWholesale segment increased $26.0 million, decreased $31,129, or 12.8%15.5%, to $229.1 million$170,053 in the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 from $203.1 million$201,182 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. We increased volume with many of our premier wholesale partners through increased sales productivity2015, primarily driven by a reduction in existing doors, including our first women’s shop-in-shop at Saks Fifth Avenue, openedfull-price orders, which includes a reduction in September 2012, and the opening of 20 additional shop-in-shops with our domestic and international partners. Additionally, we sell our products through one international free-standing store in Tokyo that is operated by one of our distribution partners and opened in the fall of 2013.replenishment product.

Net sales from our direct-to-consumerDirect-to-consumer segment increased $21.8 million, decreased $3,129, or 58.6%3.1%, to $59.1 million$98,146 in fiscal 2016 from $101,275 in fiscal 2015. Comparable sales declined $15,761, or 16.2%, including e-commerce, reflecting declines in the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 from $37.2 million in the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. This sales growth wasnumber of transactions, due to (i) comparable retaillower conversion rates and reduced traffic, and a decrease in average order value. This was partly offset by non-comparable store sales, growthwhich contributed $12,632 of 20.6% contributing $5.5 million, (ii) opening six netsales growth. Since the end of fiscal 2015, 6 new stores as compared to the prior year (bringinghave opened, bringing our total retail store count to 2854 as of February 1, 2014,January 28, 2017, compared to 2248 as of February 2, 2013) inclusiveJanuary 30, 2016.

Gross profit decreased $9,697, or 7.3%, to $122,819 in fiscal 2016 from $132,516 in fiscal 2015. As a percentage of non-comparable sales, growth contributing $12.7 million,gross margin was 45.8%, compared with 43.8% in the prior year. Gross profit and (iii) e-commerce sales growth contributing $3.5 million.

Gross Profit/Gross Marginrate increased 120 basis pointsmargin were negatively impacted in the prior year by net charges totaling $10,300 associated with the Company’s decision to 46.2% foraccelerate the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 compared to 45.0% for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.disposition of aged and excess product. The total gross margin rate increase was primarily driven by a higher percentagethe following factors:

The favorable impact from year-over-year adjustments to inventory reserves contributed approximately 800 basis points of our sales comingimprovement;

The unfavorable impact from the direct-to-consumer segment, in which we generally recognize higher margins,increased supply chain and product costs contributed negatively by approximately 400 basis points; and

The unfavorable impact from increased discounts and an increased percentageincrease in the rate of full-pricesales allowances contributed negatively by approximately 200 basis points.

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset for fiscal 2016 includes charges of $22,311 related to off-price sales in our wholesale segment. The margin rate was unfavorably impacted during the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 by increased inventory reserves,goodwill and increased margin assistance provided$30,750 related to our wholesale partners.indefinite-lived tradename asset. See “Critical Accounting Policies Fair Value Assessments of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets” below for further details.

Selling, general and administrative expenses(“SG&A”) expensesfor the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 were $83.7 million,$134,430, increasing $16.4 million,$17,640, or 24.4%15.1%, versus $67.3 million$116,790 for fiscal 2015. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales were 50.1% and 38.6% for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively. As we continue to invest in initiatives that we believe will drive future growth and with a decrease in sales in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, our SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales have deleveraged. SG&A expenses in the fiscalprior year ended February 2, 2013.included a $2,702 charge for net management transition costs. The increase in SG&A expenses compared to the prior year period is primarily due to:

Increased compensation expense

Certain strategic investments of $5.5 million$5,366 related to hiringthe transition of the information technology systems and retaining certain key employees;infrastructure in-house from Kellwood, the realignment of our supplier base, costs related to our brand update initiatives and severance and other costs related to handbags.

Increased store expensesrent and depreciation expenseoccupancy costs of $4.5 million$4,673 primarily due primarily to new retail store openings;

Increased consulting fees of $4,587 largely driven by expenses associated with the consulting agreement with our co-founders;

Increased product development costs of $4,387; and

A non-cash asset impairment charge of $2,082 in fiscal 2016 related to the impairment of property and equipment of certain retail stores with carrying values that were determined not to be recoverable and exceeded fair value.

The above increases were partially offset by:

Decreased marketing and advertising expenses of $1,021; and

A net charge of $2,702 for management transition costs recorded in the prior year.

(Loss) income from operations by segment for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 is summarized in the following table:

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Wholesale

 

$

47,098

 

 

$

61,571

 

Direct-to-consumer

 

 

1,216

 

 

 

7,839

 

Subtotal

 

 

48,314

 

 

 

69,410

 

Unallocated corporate expenses

 

 

(59,925

)

 

 

(53,684

)

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

 

(53,061

)

 

 

 

Total (loss) income from operations

 

$

(64,672

)

 

$

15,726

 

 

Increased design, development and marketing expenses of $6.0 million to support our brand awareness growth efforts and the opening of new retail stores.

32

   Operating Income by Segment 
   Fiscal Year Ended 
(in thousands)  February 1, 
2014
  February 2, 
2013
 

Wholesale

  $81,822   $72,913  

Direct-to-consumer

   10,435    4,465  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   92,957    77,378  

Unallocated expenses

   (42,904  (36,442
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

  $49,353   $40,936  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 


Operating income from our wholesaleWholesale segmentincreased $8.9 million, decreased $14,473, or 12.2%23.5%, to $81.8 million$47,098 in the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 from $72.9 million$61,571 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.2015. This increasedecrease was driven primarilyby lower gross profit resulting from the sales volume increase of $26.0 million and a decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of wholesale sales, partiallydecline discussed above, partly offset by a reductionthe favorable impact from year-over-year adjustments in the gross margin rate primarily due to charges associated with recording additional inventory reserves. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net wholesale sales resulted as our net wholesale sales grew at a rate greater than our expenses during fiscal 2013.

Operating income from our direct-to-consumerDirect-to-consumer segmentincreased $5.9 million, decreased $6,623, or 131.1%84.5% to $10.4 million$1,216 in the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 from $4.5 million$7,839 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.2015. The increasedecrease resulted primarily from the sales volumeimpact of non-cash asset impairment charges of $2,082 related to property and equipment of certain retail stores with carrying values that were determined not to be recoverable and exceeded fair value and higher SG&A expenses associated with new stores. This was partly offset by an increase in gross profit including the favorable impact from year-over-year adjustments in inventory reserves.

Unallocated corporate expenses are comprised of $21.8 million which more than offsetSG&A expenses attributable to corporate and administrative activities (such as marketing, design, finance, information technology, legal and human resources departments), and other charges that are not directly attributable to our reportable segments. In fiscal 2016, the additional operating expenses incurred duringCompany recorded $53,061 of impairment charges related to goodwill and the period to support the sales growth.tradename intangible asset. See “Critical Accounting Policies Fair Value Assessments of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets” below for further details.

Interest expensefor the decreased $1,748, or 30.8%, to $3,932 in fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 was $18.0 million, decreasing $50.7 million, or 73.8%, versus $68.7 million for the2016 from $5,680 in fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. Interest2015. The reduction in interest expense decreased as we hadis primarily due to lower average debt balances period over period. The decrease in overall debt balances was primarily to certain affiliatesas a result of Sun Capital contributing certain outstanding indebtedness to the Company in June 2013, thus eliminating interest expensevoluntary prepayments on approximately $407.5 million in debt at that time. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, we entered into theour Term Loan Facility andduring fiscal 2015 as well as lower overall average borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility. Annual interest

Other expense, is estimatednet decreased $1,404, or 81.0%, to be $11.6 million assuming $175 million outstanding borrowings$329 in fiscal 2016 from $1,733 in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016, the Company reduced the overall obligation under the Term Loan Facility.Tax Receivable Agreement with the pre-IPO stockholders by $209, whereas in fiscal 2015, the Company increased the obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement by $981. See Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” within the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Other expense, net, was $0.7 millionfor the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014, decreasing $0.1 million from $0.8 million, or 11.7% for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.

Provision for income taxesfor the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 was $7.3 million, increasing $6.1 million, or 516.9%, versus $1.2 million$93,726 as compared to $3,214 for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.2015. Our effective tax rate on pretax income for the fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 and the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 was 23.7%(136.0)% and (4.1%)38.7%, respectively. The rateseffective tax rate for fiscal 2016 included the impact of a valuation allowance established against our deferred tax assets in the amount of $121,836, or 176.8%, due to the combination of (i) a current year pre-tax loss, including goodwill and tradename impairment charges; (ii) levels of projected pre-tax income; and (iii) the Company’s ability to carry forward or carry back tax losses. Excluding the impact of the valuation allowance, the effective tax rate was 40.8% for fiscal year ended February 1, 20142016 and the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0%35% primarily due to the impact of state taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2015 differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state taxes nondeductible interest and non-deductible expenses, mostly offset by the favorable impact of recent changes in our valuation allowances forto state and local tax laws, primarily New York City, that impacted the periods presented.net operating loss deferred tax assets and the return to provision adjustment.

Net loss from discontinued operations33


The separation of the non-Vince businesses was completed on November 27, 2013. Net loss from discontinued operations was $50.8 million for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014, decreasing $27.2 million, or 34.9%, from a net loss of $78.0 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.

Net loss

Net loss was $27.4 million for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014, decreasing $80.3 million, or 74.5%, from a net loss of $107.7 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. The reduction in our net loss was primarily due to increased income from operations of $8.4 million, reduced interest expense of $50.7 million and a lower net loss from discontinued operations of $27.2 million.

Fiscal 20122015 Compared to Fiscal 20112014

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our operating results as a percentage of net sales as well as earnings per share data:

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Fiscal Year Ended   

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

Variances

 

  February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012 Variances 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Amount % of Net
Sales
 Amount % of Net
Sales
 Amount Percent 

 

Amount

 

 

Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Sales

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

(in thousands, except per share data, store and door counts and percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statements of Operations:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

  $240,352   100.0 $175,255   100.0 $65,097   37.1

 

$

302,457

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

340,396

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

(37,939

)

 

 

(11.1

)%

Cost of products sold

   132,156   55.0   89,545   51.1   42,611   47.6  

 

 

169,941

 

 

 

56.2

%

 

 

173,567

 

 

 

51.0

%

 

 

(3,626

)

 

 

(2.1

)%

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   108,196    45.0    85,710    48.9    22,486    26.2  

 

 

132,516

 

 

 

43.8

%

 

 

166,829

 

 

 

49.0

%

 

 

(34,313

)

 

 

(20.6

)%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   67,260    28.0    42,793    24.4    24,467    57.2  

 

 

116,790

 

 

 

38.6

%

 

 

96,579

 

 

 

28.4

%

 

 

20,211

 

 

 

20.9

%

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   40,936    17.0    42,917    24.5    (1,981  (4.6

 

 

15,726

 

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

70,250

 

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

(54,524

)

 

 

(77.6

)%

Interest expense, net

   68,684    28.6    81,364    46.4    (12,680  (15.6

 

 

5,680

 

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

9,698

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

 

(4,018

)

 

 

(41.4

)%

Other expense, net

   769    0.3    478    0.3    291    60.9  

 

 

1,733

 

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

835

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

898

 

 

 

107.5

%

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss before provision for income taxes

   (28,517  (11.9  (38,925  (22.2  10,408    (26.7

Income before income taxes

 

 

8,313

 

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

59,717

 

 

 

17.5

%

 

 

(51,404

)

 

 

(86.1

)%

Provision for income taxes

   1,178    0.5    2,997    1.7    (1,819  (60.7

 

 

3,214

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

23,994

 

 

 

7.0

%

 

 

(20,780

)

 

 

(86.6

)%

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

   (29,695  (12.4  (41,922  (23.9  12,227    (29.2

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (78,014  (32.5  (105,944  (60.5  27,930    (26.4
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net loss

  $(107,709  (44.8)%  $(147,866  (84.4)%  $40,157    (27.2)% 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic and Diluted loss per share:

       

Net loss from continuing operations

  $(1.13  $(1.60   

Net loss from discontinued operations

   (2.98   (4.04   
  

 

   

 

    

Net loss

  $(4.11  $(5.64   
  

 

   

 

    

Net income

 

$

5,099

 

 

 

1.7

%

 

$

35,723

 

 

 

10.5

%

 

$

(30,624

)

 

 

(85.7

)%

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

0.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Operating and Financial Data:

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wholesale doors at end of period

   2,145     1,761     

 

 

2,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stores at end of period

   22     19     

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable stores growth

   20.8   7.6   

Comparable sales growth

 

 

4.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Salessalesfor the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 were $240.4 million, increasing $65.1 million,$302,457, decreasing $37,939, or 37.1%11.1%, versus $175.3 million$340,396 for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2014. The increasedecrease in sales compared to the prior year is due to an increasea decrease in volume across bothour Wholesale segment. The following is a summary of our business segments.net sales by segment for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014:

  

  Net Sales by Segment 
  Fiscal Year Ended 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)  February 2, 
2013
   January 28, 
2012
 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Wholesale

  $203,107    $151,921  

 

$

201,182

 

 

$

259,418

 

Direct-to-consumer

   37,245     23,334  

 

 

101,275

 

 

 

80,978

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $240,352    $175,255  
  

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

 

$

302,457

 

 

$

340,396

 

Net sales from our wholesaleWholesale segment increased $51.2 million, decreased $58,236, or 33.7%22.4%, to $203.1 million$201,182 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 from $151.9 million$259,418 in the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012. Our growth was2014 primarily due to the significant expansionlower full price customer reorders and lower off price orders. The contraction of the number ofour wholesale business was partly offset by an increase in net wholesale doors by nearly 400, or over 20% of 47 and the addition of 11 shop-in-shops with our door base atwholesale partners since the beginningend of the fiscal year.

2014.

Net sales from our direct-to-consumerDirect-to-consumer segment increased $13.9 million,$20,297, or 59.6%25.1%, to $37.2 million$101,275 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 from $23.3 million$80,978 in the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012. This2014. $3,291 of the sales growth was dueis attributable to (i) comparable retail store sales growth of 20.8% contributing $4.4 million, (ii) opening three net4.2%, including e-commerce, primarily due to an increase in transactions partly offset by a decrease in the average order size. Non-comparable store sales contributed $17,006 of the sales growth and includes the impact of 11 new stores as compared tothat have opened since the prior yearend of fiscal 2014 (bringing our total retail store count to 22 as of February 1, 2013, compared to 1948 as of January 28, 2012) contributing $5.2 million, and (iii) e-commerce sales growth contributing $4.4 million.

Gross Profit/Gross Marginrate decreased 390 basis points to 45.0% for the fiscal year ended February 2, 201330, 2016, compared to 48.9%37 as of January 31, 2015).

Gross profit decreased $34,313, or 20.6%, to $132,516 in fiscal 2015 from $166,829 in fiscal 2014. As a percentage of sales, gross margin was 43.8%, compared with 49.0% in the prior year. Gross profit and gross margin were negatively impacted by the full year $16,263 inventory reserve charge in the current year. Of this charge, $10,300 is attributable to inventory that no longer supports our prospective brand positioning strategy, with the balance relating to normal, recurring provisions based on our existing accounting policy for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.aged inventory. The total gross margin rate decrease was driven primarily by additional marginthe following factors:

The impact from higher assistance provided to our wholesale partners and increasedhad a combined negative impact of 490 basis points;

34


Higher year-over-year inventory reserve charge impacted gross margins negatively by 301 basis points; and

Increased sales penetration of off-price sales to full price sales.the Direct-to-consumer segment contributed 190 basis points of improvement.

Selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses for the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 were $67.3 million,$116,790, increasing $24.5 million,$20,211, or 57.2%20.9%, versus $42.8 million$96,579 for fiscal 2014. SG&A expenses as a percent of net sales were 38.6% and 28.4% for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. SG&A expenses in the fiscalcurrent year ended January 28, 2012.include a $2,702 charge for net management transition costs which consists of $3,394 of severance expense and $615 of executive search costs which were partly offset by $1,307 of stock option forfeitures. See Note 5 “Commitments and Contingencies” within the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details. SG&A expenses in the prior year include $571 of costs incurred by us related to the secondary offering by certain stockholders of the Company completed in July 2014. As we continue to invest in our growth and from our recent decline in sales, our SG&A expenses as a percent of sales have deleveraged. The increase in SG&A expenses compared to the prior year period is primarily due to:

Increased

Increase in compensation expense and professional search fees of $15.1 million$8,668, primarily driven by the net management transition costs discussed above, as well as employee benefits and related increases due to hiring and retaining certain keyadditional employees (including transition paymentsto support our growth plans;

Increase in rent and occupancy costs of $6.4 million$4,661 due primarily to the 11 new retail store openings and our founders)new design studio and increased expenses from expanded and dedicated resourcesParis showroom space;

Increase in retail operations;

Increased occupancy and depreciation expense of $1.9 million$3,072 due primarily to the 11 new retail store openings;

Increasedstores, shop-in-shop expenditures and our new design developmentstudio and Paris showroom space;

Increase in marketing, advertising and promotional expenses of $1.9 million$1,763 to support our brand awareness growth efforts primarily in the e-commerce channel;

Increase in consulting fees of $1,546 largely driven by expenses associated with the consulting agreements with our co-founders; and

The above increases were partly offset by $2,340 of lower costs charged under our Shared Services Agreement as we have transitioned certain back office support functions in-house that were previously performed by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement.

Income from operations by segment for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 is summarized in the opening of new retail stores; andfollowing table:

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Wholesale

 

$

61,571

 

 

$

100,623

 

Direct-to-consumer

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

14,556

 

Subtotal

 

 

69,410

 

 

 

115,179

 

Unallocated corporate expenses

 

 

(53,684

)

 

 

(44,929

)

Total income from operations

 

$

15,726

 

 

$

70,250

 

 

Increased corporate costs such as legal and other professional fees of $2.7 million associated with preparing to become a public company.

   Operating Income by Segment 
   Fiscal Year Ended 
(in thousands)  February 2, 
2013
  January 28, 
2012
 

Wholesale

  $72,913   $62,635  

Direct-to-consumer

   4,465    559  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal

   77,378    63,194  

Unallocated expenses

   (36,442  (20,277
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

  $40,936   $42,917  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income from our wholesaleWholesale segmentincreased $10.3 million, decreased $39,052, or 16.4%38.8%, to $72.9 million$61,571 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 from $62.6 million$100,623 in the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2014. This increasedecrease was driven primarily fromby the lower gross margin performance due to wholesale inventory reserves of $9,615 and the sales volume increase of $51.2 million, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of wholesale sales, driven by increased compensation costs, and reduction in the gross margin rate, primarily due to higher cost of goods and increased margin assistance to our wholesale partners.decrease noted above.

Operating income from our direct-to-consumerDirect-to-consumer segmentincreased $3.9 million, decreased $6,717, or 650.0%46.1% to $4.5 million$7,839 in fiscal 2015 from $14,556 in fiscal 2014. The decrease resulted primarily from the impact of inventory reserves of $6,648 combined with lower gross margins driven by higher promotional activity and higher SG&A expenses associated with the 11 new stores that have opened since the end of fiscal year ended February 2, 20132014.

Interest expense decreased $4,018, or 41.4%, to $5,680 in fiscal 2015 from $0.6 million$9,698 in fiscal 2014. The reduction in interest expense is primarily due to the lower overall debt balances since the end of fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2014 as a result of voluntary prepayments on the Term Loan Facility and borrowings against the Revolving Credit Facility with more favorable interest rates.

Other expense, net was $1,733 for fiscal 2015 compared to $835 for fiscal 2014. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in the sales volume increase of $13.9 million which more than offsetobligation under the additional operating expenses incurred duringTax Receivable Agreement (see Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” within the periodnotes to support the sales growth.Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Interest expensefor the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 was $68.7 million, decreasing $12.7 million, or 15.6%, versus $81.4 million for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012. Interest expense decreased as we had lower average debt balances period over period.

Other expense, net was $0.8 millionfor the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, increasing $0.3 million, or 60.9% from $0.5 million for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.

Provision for income taxesfor the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 was $1.2 million, decreasing $1.8 million, or 60.7%, versus $3.0 million$3,214 as compared to $23,994 for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2014. Our effective tax rate on pretax income for the fiscal year ended February 2, 20132015 and the fiscal year ended January 28, 20122014 was (4.1%)38.7% and (7.7%)40.2%, respectively. The ratesrate for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 and the fiscal year ended January 28, 20122015 differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to state taxes nondeductible interest and non-deductible expenses, mostly offset by the favorable impact of recent changes in our valuation allowancesto state and local tax laws, primarily New York City, that impacted the net operating loss deferred tax assets and the return to provision adjustment. The rate for fiscal 2014 differed from the periods presented.

Net loss from discontinued operations

Net loss from discontinued operations was $78.0 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, decreasing $27.9 million, or 26.3%, from a net lossU.S. statutory rate of $105.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.

Net loss

Net loss was $107.7 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, decreasing $40.2 million, or 27.2%, from a net loss of $147.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012. The reduction in our net loss was35.0% primarily due to reduced interest expense of $12.7 million and lower net loss from discontinued operations of $27.9 million, partially offset by lower income from operations of $2.0 million.state taxes.

Discontinued Operations35


On November 27, 2013, in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, we separated the Vince and non-Vince businesses whereby the non-Vince business is now owned by Kellwood Holding, LLC, of which 100% of the membership interests are owned by the Pre-IPO Stockholders. As the Company and Kellwood Holding, LLC are under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital, this separation transaction resulted in a $73.1 million adjustment to additional paid in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 1, 2014.

As a result of the separation with the non-Vince businesses, the financial results for the non-Vince businesses, through the separation, on November 27, 2013, are now included in results from discontinued operations. The non-Vince businesses continue to operate as a stand-alone company. Due to differences in the basis of presentation for discontinued operations and the basis of presentation as a stand-alone company, the financial results of the non-Vince businesses included within discontinued operations of the Company may not be indicative of actual financial results of the non-Vince businesses as a stand-alone company.

In connection with the Restructuring Transactions, the Company issued the Kellwood Note Receivable to Kellwood Company, LLC, in the amount of $341.5 million, the proceeds of which were primarily used by Kellwood to repay, discharge or repurchase indebtedness of Kellwood Company, LLC. As a result, neither Vince Holding Corp. nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries have any obligations with respect to the Wells Fargo Facility, the Cerberus Term Loan, the Sun Term Loan Agreements, any 12.875% Notes, or any 7.625% Notes.

The results of the non-Vince businesses included in discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except effective tax rates).

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Net sales

  $400,848   $514,806   $550,790  

Cost of products sold

   313,620    409,763    446,494  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   87,228    105,043    104,296  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   98,016    132,871    141,248  

Restructuring, environmental and other charges

   1,628    5,732    3,139  

Impairment of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill)

   1,399    6,497    8,418  

Impairment of goodwill

   —      —      11,046  

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,473    (7,162  (1,578

Interest expense, net

   46,677    55,316    46,256  

Other expense, net

   498    (9,776  1,448  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   (62,463  (78,435  (105,681

Income taxes

   (11,648  (421  263  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

  $(50,815 $(78,014 $(105,944
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

   18.6  0.5  (0.2)% 

Net loss from discontinued operations—Fiscal 2013 Compared to Fiscal 2012

The separation of the non-Vince businesses was completed on November 27, 2013. Net loss from discontinued operations was $50.8 million for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014, decreasing $27.2 million, or 34.9%, from a net loss of $78.0 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013. Results for fiscal 2013 include two fewer months compared to fiscal 2012 and were positively impacted by income tax benefit of $11.6 million. This tax benefit was generated primarily as a result of the release of valuation allowance related to the allocation of a disallowed tax loss on the sale of a trademark to intangibles with indefinite lives, resulting in fewer deferred tax liabilities that cannot be offset against deferred tax assets for valuation allowance purposes.

Net loss from discontinued operations—Fiscal 2012 Compared to Fiscal 2011

Net loss from discontinued operations was $78.0 million for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, decreasing $27.9 million, or 26.3%, from a net loss of $105.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012. Results for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012 were negatively impacted by non-cash impairment charges of $19.5 million. Of this, $11.0 million related to goodwill impairment charges due to a decrease in the near-term forecasted EBITDA of recently completed acquisitions as a result of delays in expected growth and cost synergies. The remaining $8.5 million primarily relates to impairment charges related to indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily tradenames, as a result of declining results of certain brands. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $132.9 million, or 25.8% of net sales for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013, decreasing $8.3 million, or 5.9%, from $141.2 million, or 25.6% of net sales for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Vince Holding Corp.’sOur sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, andif any, borrowings available under the Revolving Credit Facility.Facility and our ability to access capital markets. Our primary cash needs are capital expenditures for new stores and related leasehold improvements, for our new offices, meeting our debt service requirements,

paying amounts due perunder the Tax Receivable Agreement and funding working capital requirements. The most significant components of our working capital are cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable and other current liabilities. In accordance with new accounting guidance that became effective for fiscal 2016, management has concluded there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. See “—Outlook” below.Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (D) Sources and Uses of Liquidity” within the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details. In addition, see Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On November 27, 2013,March 15, 2016, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with Sun Cardinal, LLC and SCSF Cardinal, LLC, affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. (collectively the “Investors”) pursuant to which Sun Cardinal and SCSF Cardinal agreed to backstop a rights offering by purchasing at the subscription price of $5.50 per share any and all shares not subscribed through the exercise of rights, including the oversubscription. See Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” within the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On March 29, 2016, the Company commenced a rights offering (the “Rights Offering”), whereby the Company distributed, at no charge, to stockholders of record as of March 23, 2016 (the “Rights Offering Record Date”), rights to purchase new shares of the Company’s common stock at $5.50 per share. Each stockholder as of the Rights Offering Record Date (“Rights Holders”) received one non-transferrable right to purchase 0.3191 shares for every share of common stock owned on the Rights Offering Record Date (the “subscription right”). Rights Holders who fully exercised their subscription rights were entitled to subscribe for additional shares that remained unsubscribed as a result of any unexercised subscription rights (the “over-subscription right”). The over-subscription right allowed a Rights Holder to subscribe for an additional number of shares equal to up to 20% of the shares of common stock for which such holder was otherwise entitled to subscribe. Subscription rights could only be exercised for whole numbers of shares; no fractional shares of common stock were issued in the Rights Offering. The Rights Offering period expired on April 14, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. New York City time, prior to which payment for all subscription rights required an irrevocable funding of cash to the transfer agent, to be held in an account for the benefit of the Company. The Investors fully subscribed in the Rights Offering and exercised their oversubscription right. The Company received subscriptions and oversubscriptions from its existing stockholders for a total of 11,622,518 shares of its common stock, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $63,924. Simultaneous with the closing of the Rights Offering, the Company received $1,076 of gross proceeds from the related Investment Agreement and issued to the Investors 195,663 shares of its common stock in connection therewith. In total, the Company received total gross proceeds of $65,000 as a result of the Rights Offering and related Investment Agreement transactions. Upon the completion of these transactions, affiliates of Sun Capital owned 58% of our outstanding common stock.

The Company used a portion of the net proceeds received from the Rights Offering and related Investment Agreement to (1) repay the amount owed by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement with Sun Cardinal, for itself and as a representative of the other stockholders party thereto, for the tax benefit with respect to the 2014 taxable year including accrued interest, totaling $22,262 (see Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” within the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K), and (2) repay all then outstanding indebtedness, totaling $20,000, under our Revolving Credit Facility. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds, which funds are held by VHC until needed by our operating subsidiary, for additional strategic investments and general corporate purposes, which may include future amounts owed by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement. During April 2017, the Company utilized $6,241 of the funds held by VHC to make a Specified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Term Loan Facility, in connection with the consummationcalculation of the IPOConsolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan as of January 28, 2017 so that the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio would not exceed 3.25 to 1.00. As of April 28, 2017, VHC retains $15,196 of funds and Restructuring Transactions, all previously outstanding debt obligations either remained with Kellwood (i.e. the non-Vince businesses) or were discharged, repurchased or refinanced. Inmanagement anticipates it will be necessary to make an additional Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the consummationcalculation of these transactions, Vince Holding Corp. entered intothe Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of April 29, 2017, utilizing a portion of this retained cash.

Additionally, in order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into a side letter (the “Letter”) with BofA, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility which are discussedtemporarily modified the covenant that requires that at any point when “Excess Availability” is less than the greater of (i) 15% of the adjusted loan cap (without giving effect to item (iii) of the loan cap described below) or (ii) $10,000, and continuing until Excess Availability exceeds the greater of such amounts for 30 consecutive days, during which time, we must maintain a consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) equal to or greater than $20,000 measured at the end of each applicable fiscal month for the trailing twelve-month period. The Letter provided that during the period from March 6, 2017 until and through April 30, 2017, the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” under the Revolving Credit Facility were temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined under the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. On April 14, 2017, Vince, LLC and BofA amended and restated the Letter in its entirety (the “Amended Letter”). The Amended Letter provides that during the period from April 13, 2017 until and through July 31, 2017 (the “Letter

36


Period”), the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” in the Revolving Credit Facility continue to be temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. The Amended Letter further below.provides that during the Letter Period, so long as the Company’s cash is held in a deposit account of the Company maintained with BofA (the “BofA Account”), the Company may include in the Borrowing Base (i) up to $10,000 of such cash after April 13, 2017 through May 31, 2017 and (ii) up to $5,000 of such cash after May 31, 2017 through July 31, 2017. During the Letter Period, to the extent that the cash and cash equivalents held by the Loan Parties at the close of business on any given day exceeds $1,000 (excluding amounts in the BofA Account and certain other excluded accounts, as well as amounts equal to all undrawn checks and ACH issued in the ordinary course of business for payroll, rent and other accounts payable needs), Vince shall use any such cash in excess of $1,000 to repay the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Operating Activities

 

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Operating activities

    

Net loss

  $(27,420 $(107,709 $(147,866

Loss from discontinued operations

   (50,815  (78,014  (105,944

Add (deduct) items not affecting operating cash flows:

    

Depreciation

   2,186    1,411    1,102  

Amortization of intangible assets

   599    598    599  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   178    —      —    

Deferred income taxes

   7,225    1,147    2,979  

Share-based compensation expense

   347    —      —    

Capitalized PIK Interest

   15,883    68,684    81,363  

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

   262    —      8  

Changes in assets and liabilities

    

Receivables, net

   (6,265  (7,459  (12,174

Inventories, net

   (15,069  (8,360  (2,592

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1,681    (2,455  (490

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   3,235    17,208    2,937  

Other assets and liabilities

   309    295    291  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities—continuing operations

   33,966    41,374    32,101  

Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

   (54,667  (67,408  (70,335
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

  $(20,701 $(26,034 $(38,254
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(162,659

)

 

$

5,099

 

 

$

35,723

 

Add (deduct) items not affecting operating cash flows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

 

53,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

8,684

 

 

 

8,350

 

 

 

5,267

 

Impairment of property and equipment

 

 

2,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for inventories

 

 

839

 

 

 

16,263

 

 

 

3,719

 

Deferred rent

 

 

413

 

 

 

1,723

 

 

 

3,045

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

93,444

 

 

 

2,745

 

 

 

23,248

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

1,344

 

 

 

1,259

 

 

 

1,896

 

Other

 

 

701

 

 

 

1,634

 

 

 

1,532

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net

 

 

(936

)

 

 

24,397

 

 

 

6,401

 

Inventories

 

 

(2,792

)

 

 

(15,420

)

 

 

(7,182

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

598

 

 

 

3,441

 

 

 

2,809

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(24,414

)

 

 

1,044

 

 

 

3,066

 

Other assets and liabilities

 

 

(25

)

 

 

1,093

 

 

 

742

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

$

(29,660

)

 

$

51,628

 

 

$

80,266

 

Because we were financed as part of Kellwood and cash was centrally managed by Kellwood Company, our cash balance as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 primarily represents retail store deposits.

Continuing operations

Net cash provided byused in operating activities primarily consistsduring fiscal 2016 was $29,660, which consisted of a net income (loss), adjusted for certainloss of $162,659, impacted by non-cash items of $160,568, including PIK interest$121,836 to record a full valuation allowance on the Sun Promissory Notesour deferred tax assets, and Sun Capital Loan Agreement, which was later contributed as capital, as well as depreciation, amortization and changes in deferred income taxes and the effects of changescash used in working capital of $27,569. Net cash used in working capital resulted primarily from a cash outflow in accounts payable and other activities.accrued expenses of $24,414, which included the payment of $29,700, including interest, under the Tax Receivable Agreement with Sun Cardinal.

Net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 20132015 was $34.0 million,$51,628, which consisted of net income of $23.4 million,$5,099, impacted by non-cash items of $26.7 million$31,974 and cash used inprovided by working capital of

$16.1 million. $14,555. Net cash used inprovided by working capital primarily resulted from an increase in inventory, net of $15.1 million due to increased sales volumes, new retail stores and shop-in-shops and the planned delay in timing of certain shipments to select wholesale partners. Additionally there was an increasea cash inflow in receivables, net of $6.3 million due to$24,397 driven largely by the timing of customer receipts. This was offset in part due to increases in our accounts payablecurrent year collections from prior year receivables and other accrued expenses of $3.2 millionlower wholesale performance and a decreasecash inflow in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1.7 million.$3,441 primarily due to timing, partly offset by a cash outflow in inventories of $15,420 due to new store additions, increased handbag inventory and higher in-transit inventory.

Net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 20122014 was $41.4 million,$80,266, which consisted of net lossincome of $29.7 million,$35,723, impacted by non-cash items of $71.9 million$38,707 and cash used inprovided by working capital of $0.8 million. Non-cash expenses primarily consisted of PIK interest expense of $68.7 million.$5,836. Net cash used inprovided by working capital primarily resulted from an increasewas, in inventories, net of $8.4 millionpart, due to timing of inventory receipts and an increasea cash inflow in receivables, net of $7.5 million due to the timing$6,401 driven largely by higher trade deductions, cash inflows in prepaid expenses and other current assets of customer receipts.$2,809 and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3,066. This was partially offset by increasesa cash outflow in inventories of $7,182 due to increased inventory purchases to support new stores and shop-in-shops and the impact of higher in-transit inventory resulting primarily from a change in our accounts payable and other accrued expenses of $17.2 million dueshipping strategy to the timing of vendor payments as well as the accrual of $6.4 million in transition payment to our founders, which was subsequently paid during fiscal 2013.an FOB shipment basis.

Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2011 was $32.1 million, which consisted of net loss of $41.9 million, impacted by non-cash items of $86.1 million and cash used in working capital of $12.0 million. Non-cash expenses primarily consisted of PIK interest expense of $81.4 million. Net cash used in working capital primarily resulted from an increase in inventories, net of $12.2 million and an increase in receivables, net of $2.6 million.37


Discontinued operations

Net cash used in operating activities for 2013 was $54.7 million, which consisted of net loss of $50.8 million adjusted for noncash charges of $15.3 million, and cash used in working capital of $19.2 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for 2012 was $67.4 million, which consisted of net loss of $78.0 million adjusted for noncash charges of $25.5 million, and cash used in working capital of $14.9 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for 2011 was $70.4 million, which consisted of net loss of $105.9 million adjusted for noncash charges of $51.0 million, and cash used in working capital of $15.5 million.

Investing Activities

 

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Investing activities

  

Payments for capital expenditures

  $(10,073 $(1,821 $(1,450

Payments for contingent purchase price

   —      (806  (58,465
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities – continuing operations

   (10,073  (2,627  (59,915

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities – discontinued operations

   (5,936  20,088    (9,637
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

  $(16,009 $17,461   $(69,552
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments for capital expenditures

 

$

(14,287

)

 

$

(17,591

)

 

$

(19,699

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(14,287

)

 

$

(17,591

)

 

$

(19,699

)

Continuing operations

Net cash used in investing activities of $14,287 during fiscal 2016 represents capital expenditures primarily related to the investment in our new systems and related infrastructure and retail store build-outs, including leasehold improvements and store fixtures.

Net cash used in investing activities of $17,591 during fiscal 2015 represents capital expenditures related to retail store build-outs, including leasehold improvements, costs related to the build-out of our design studio and Paris showroom space, store fixtures as well as expenditures for our shop-in-shop spaces operated by certain distribution partners and the investment in new systems and related infrastructure.

Net cash used in investing activities of $19,699 during fiscal 2014 represents capital expenditures related to retail store build-outs, including leasehold improvements and store fixtures and cash payments paid to CRL Group (former owners of the Vince business) related to the acquisition of the Vince business as a result of achievement of performance goals as specified in the related purchase agreement.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $7.5 million from $2.6 million used in investing activities during fiscal 2012 to $10.1 million used in investing activities during fiscal 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in capital expenditures of $8.3 million resulting from construction of additional retail stores during the year, additional build-out of shop-in-shops within selected wholesale partner locations, as well as expenditures for our shop-in-shop spaces operated by certain distribution partners and the costs related to the upgradebuild-out of our website, which re-launched during the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $57.3 million from $59.9 million used in investing activities in fiscal 2011 to $2.6 million used in investing activities in fiscal 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to the cash purchase consideration of $58.5 million paid to CRL Group (former owners of the Vince business) related to the acquisition of the Vince business, offset by an increase in capital expenditures.

Discontinued operations

Net cash used in investing activities for 2013 was $5.9 million, primarily consisting of $7.1 million of cashcorporate office spaces and cash equivalents retained by the non-Vince business after the Restructuring Transactions. Additionally there were $4.8 million in payments for capital expenditures and other assets related to the non-Vince business during the year, offset in part by proceeds from the sale of various assets of the non-Vince business prior to the Restructuring Transactions of $5.4 million, net of selling costs.

Net cash provided by investing activities for 2012 was $20.1 million, consisting of proceeds from the sale of various assets of the non-Vince business of $28.9 million, net of selling costs, offset in part by payments for capital expenditures and other assets of the non-Vince business of $8.3 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for 2011 was $9.6 million consisting of payments for capital expenditures and other assets of the non-Vince business.showroom facilities.

Financing Activities

 

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012   2011 

Financing activities

     

Proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan Facility

  $175,000   $—      $—    

Repayment of debt

   (5,000  —       —    

Payment for Kellwood Note Receivable

   (341,500  —       —    

Fees paid for Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility

   (5,146  —       —    

Proceeds from common stock issuance, net of certain transaction costs

   186,000    —       —    

Stock option exercises

   42    —       —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities—continuing operations

   9,396    —       —    

Net cash provided by financing activities—discontinued operations

   46,917    8,615     104,451  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  $56,313   $8,615    $104,451  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

$

181,367

 

 

$

115,127

 

 

$

50,500

 

Repayment of borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

(191,167

)

 

 

(123,127

)

 

 

(27,500

)

Repayment of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility

 

 

 

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

(105,000

)

Proceeds from common stock issuance, net of transaction costs

 

 

63,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises and issuance of common stock

under employee stock purchase plan

 

 

4,722

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

175

 

Fees paid for Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

 

 

 

(94

)

 

 

(114

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

$

58,695

 

 

$

(27,919

)

 

$

(81,939

)

Continuing operations

Net cash provided by financing activities primarily relates to borrowings and repayments of the debt obligations and debt issuance costs related thereto, as well as activity related to the issuance of our common stock and exercise of employee stock options.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.4 million$58,695 during fiscal 2013,2016, primarily consisting of $186.0 million ofnet proceeds received from the issuance of common stock net of certain transactions costs, on November 27, 2013. Inin connection with the IPOcompleted Rights Offering of $63,773 and the Restructuring Transactions discussed elsewhere in this annual report in Form 10-K, the Company made$4,722 of proceeds received from stock option exercises and issuance of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan, partly offset by $9,800 of net repayments of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

Net cash used by financing activities was $27,919 during fiscal 2015, primarily consisting of $175.0 million under thevoluntary prepayments totaling $20,000 on our Term Loan Facility and also$8,000 of net repayments of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

Net cash used by financing activities was $81,939 during fiscal 2014, primarily consisting of voluntary prepayments totaling $105,000 on our Term Loan Facility, partially offset by $23,000 of net proceeds from borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility.

Revolving Credit Facility

On November 27, 2013, Vince, LLC entered into an agreement fora $50,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended from time to time, the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as administrative agent. Vince, LLC is the borrower and VHC and Vince Intermediate, a direct subsidiary of VHC and the direct parent company of Vince, LLC, are the guarantors under the Revolving Credit Facility. On June 3, 2015, Vince LLC entered into a first amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, for which we paid $5.1 million in debt issuance costs. The proceeds from these activities were then used to repaythat among other things, increased the Kellwood Note Receivable of $341.5 million. In January of fiscal 2014, the Company made a voluntary pre-payment of $5.0 million on the Term Loan Facility.

Discontinued operations

Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2013 was $46.9 million, primarily consisting of $5.0 million borrowingsaggregate commitments under the Sun Term Loan Agreements,facility from $50,000 to $80,000, subject to a loan cap which is the lesser of (i) the Borrowing Base, as well a $41.9 million net increasedefined in borrowingsthe loan agreement, (ii) the aggregate commitments, or (iii) $70,000 until debt obligations under the Kellwood revolving credit facilities, net of fees paid.

Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2012 was $8.6 million, primarily consisting of $30.0 million borrowings underCompany’s term loan facility have been paid in full, and extended the Sun Term Loan Agreements and $1.9 million in payments under the Rebecca Taylor earnout agreement, offset in part by $15.0 million payments for debt extinguishment during the year as well as $1.0 million in fees paid related to financing agreements.

Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2011 was $104.5 million, primarily consisting of $24.9 million borrowings under the Sun Term Loan Agreements, $55.0 million borrowings under the Cerberus Term Loan, a net increase of borrowings under Kellwood revolving credit facilities of $30.6 million, offset in part by $4.9 million in fees paid related to financing agreements.

Existing Credit Facilities and Debt as of February 1, 2014 (Post IPO and Restructuring Transactions)

Revolving Credit Facility

Onmaturity date from November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, Vince, LLC entered into the Revolving Credit Facility. BofA serves as administrative agent under this new facility. This Revolving Credit Facility provides for a revolving line of credit of up2018 to $50 million maturing on November 27, 2018.June 3, 2020. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for a letter of credit sublimit of $25 million$25,000 (plus any increase in aggregate commitments) and an accordion option that allows for an increase in aggregate commitments of up to $20 million. Vince, LLC is the borrower and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC are the guarantors under the Revolving Credit Facility.$20,000. Interest is payable on the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility at either the LIBOR or the Base Rate, in each case, withplus an applicable marginsmargin of 1.25% to 1.75% for LIBOR loans or 0.25% to 0.75% for Base Rate loans, and in each case subject to a pricing grid based on an average daily

38


excess availability calculation. The “Base Rate” means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by BofA as its prime rate; (ii) the Federal Funds Rate for such day, plus 0.50%; and (iii) the LIBOR Rate for a one month interest period as determined on such day, plus 1.0%. During the continuance of an event of default and at the election of the required lender, interest will accrue at a rate of 2% in excess of the applicable non-default rate.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains a requirementcovenant that, at any point when “Excess Availability” is less than the greater of (i) 15% percentof the adjusted loan cap (without giving effect to item (iii) of the loan cap described above) or (ii) $7.5 million,$10,000, and continuing until Excess Availability exceeds the greater of such amounts for 30 consecutive days, during which time, Vince, LLCwe must maintain a consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the related credit agreement)Revolving Credit Facility) equal to or greater than $20 million.$20,000 measured at the end of each applicable fiscal month for the trailing twelve-month period. As of January 28, 2017, we were not subject to this covenant as Excess Availability was greater than the required minimum. Additionally, in order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into the Letter with BofA, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility which temporarily modified the covenant discussed above. The Letter provided that during the period from March 6, 2017 until and through April 30, 2017, the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” under the Revolving Credit Facility were temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined under the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. On April 14, 2017, Vince, LLC and BofA amended and restated the Letter in its entirety (the “Amended Letter”). The Amended Letter provides that during the period from April 13, 2017 until and through July 31, 2017 (the “Letter Period”), the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” in the Revolving Credit Facility continue to be temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. The Amended Letter further provides that during the Letter Period, so long as the Company’s cash is held in a deposit account of the Company maintained with BofA (the “BofA Account”), the Company may include in the Borrowing Base (i) up to $10,000 of such cash after April 13, 2017 through May 31, 2017 and (ii) up to $5,000 of such cash after May 31, 2017 through July 31, 2017. During the Letter Period, to the extent that the cash and cash equivalents held by the Loan Parties at the close of business on any given day exceeds $1,000 (excluding amounts in the BofA Account and certain other excluded accounts, as well as amounts equal to all undrawn checks and ACH issued in the ordinary course of business for payroll, rent and other accounts payable needs), Vince shall use any such cash in excess of $1,000 to repay the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains representations and warranties, other covenants and events of default that are customary for this type of financing, including limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, prepayment of other debt, the repurchase of capital stock, transactions with affiliates, and the ability to change the nature of itsthe Company’s business or its fiscal year. The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility generally permits dividends in the absence of any event of default (including any event of default arising from the contemplated dividend), so long as (i) after giving pro

formapro-forma effect to the contemplated dividend, for the following six months Excess Availability will be at least the greater of 20% of the aggregate lending commitmentsadjusted loan cap and $7.5 million$10,000 and (ii) after giving pro forma effect to the contemplated dividend, the “Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” for the 12 months preceding such dividend shall be greater than or equal to 1.11.0 to 1.0 (provided that the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio may be less than 1.11.0 to 1.0 if, after giving pro forma effect to the contemplated dividend, Excess Availability for the six fiscal months following the dividend is at least the greater of 35% of the aggregate lending commitmentsadjusted loan cap and $10 million)$15,000). We areAs of January 28, 2017, we were in compliance with applicable financial covenants.

There were no short term borrowings underAs of January 28, 2017, the Revolving Credit Facility at February 1, 2014. Outstanding letters of credit were $4.5 million and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $45.5 million at February 1, 2014.$27,157 net of the amended loan cap and there were $5,200 of borrowings outstanding and $7,474 of letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility as of January 28, 2017 was 4.3%.

As of January 30, 2016, the availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $28,127 net of the amended loan cap and there were $15,000 of borrowings outstanding and $7,522 of letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility as of January 30, 2016 was 2.1%.

As of January 31, 2015, the availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $19,353 and there was $23,000 of borrowings outstanding and $7,647 of letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility as of January 31, 2015 was 2.1%.

Term Loan Facility

On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate entered into a new $175.0 million$175,000 senior secured term loan credit facility (as amended from time to time, the “Term Loan Facility”) with the lenders party thereto, BofA, as administrative agent, JPMorganJP Morgan Chase Bank and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers, and Cantor Fitzgerald as documentation agent. The new Term Loan Facility will mature on November 27, 2019. On November 27, 2013, net borrowingsVince, LLC and Vince Intermediate are borrowers (the “Borrowers”) and VHC is a guarantor under the new Term Loan Facility were used, at closing, to repay the Kellwood Note Receivable issued by Vince Intermediate to Kellwood Company immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO as part of the Restructuring Transactions.Facility.

The Term Loan Facility also provides for an incremental facility of up to the greater of $50 million$50,000 and an amount that would result in the consolidated net total secured leverage ratio not exceeding 3.00 to 1.00, in addition to certain other rights to refinance or

39


repurchase portions of the term loan. The Term Loan Facility is subject to quarterly amortization of principal equal to 0.25% of the original aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility,Term Loan Facility (adjusted to reflect any prepayments), with the balance payable at final maturity. Interest is payable on loans under the term loan facilityTerm Loan Facility at a rate of either (i) the Eurodollar rate (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus an applicable margin of 4.75% to 5.00% based on a consolidated net total leverage ratio or (ii) the base rate (subjectapplicable margin of 3.75% to 4.00% based on a 2.00% floor) plus 3.00%.consolidated net total leverage ratio. During the continuance of a payment or bankruptcy event of default, interest will accrue (i) on the overdue principal amount of any loan at a rate of 2% in excess of the rate otherwise applicable to such loan and (ii) on any overdue interest or any other outstanding overdue amount at a rate of 2% in excess of the nondefaultnon-default interest rate then applicable to base rate loans.The Term Loan Facility requires Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate to make mandatory prepayments upon the occurrence of certain events, including additional debt issuances, common and preferred stock issuances, certain asset sales, and annual payments of 50% of excess cash flow, subject to reductions to 25% and 0% if Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate maintain a Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio of 2.50 to 1.00 and 2.00 to 1.00, respectively, and subject to reductions for voluntary prepayments made during such fiscal year.

The Term Loan Facility contains a requirementcovenant that Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate maintain a “Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio” as of the last day of any period of four fiscal quarters not to exceed 3.75:1.003.25 to 1.00. The Term Loan Facility permits VHC to make a Specified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Agreement, to the Borrowers in order to increase, dollar for dollar, Consolidated EBITDA for such fiscal quarter for the purposes of determining compliance with this covenant at the end of such fiscal quarter and applicable subsequent periods provided that (a) in each four fiscal quarter period there shall be at least two fiscal quarters ending February 1, 2014 through November 1, 2014, 3.50:1.0 forin which no Specified Equity Contribution is made; (b) no more than five Specified Equity Contributions shall be made in the fiscal quarters ending January 31, 2015, through October 31, 2015,aggregate during the term of the Agreement; and 3.25:1.00 for(c) the fiscal quarter ending January 30, 2016 and each fiscal quarter thereafter. amount of any Specified Equity Contribution shall be no greater than the amount required to cause the Company to be in compliance with this covenant.

In addition, the Term Loan Facility contains customary representations and warranties, other covenants, and events of default, including but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, prepayment of other debt, the repurchase of capital stock, transactions with affiliates, and the ability to change the nature of itsthe Company’s business or its fiscal year, and distributions and dividends. The Term Loan Facility generally permits dividends to the extent that no default or event of default is continuing or would result from the contemplated dividend and the pro forma Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio after giving effect to such contemplated dividend is at least 0.25 lower than the maximum Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio for such quarter.quarter in an amount not to exceed the excess available amount, as defined in the loan agreement. All obligations under the Term Loan Facility are guaranteed by Vince Holding Corp.VHC and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries of Vince, LLC and secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of Vince Holding Corp.,VHC, Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries. We are

As of January 28, 2017, we were in compliance with applicable financial covenants.

During April 2017, the fourth quarterCompany utilized $6,241 of fiscal 2013, we madethe funds held by VHC to make a voluntary payment of $5.0 million onSpecified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Term Loan Facility.Facility, in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of January 28, 2017 so that the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio would not exceed 3.25 to 1.00. As of February 1, 2014,April 28, 2017, VHC retains $15,196 of funds and management anticipates it will be necessary to make an additional Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of April 29, 2017, utilizing a portion of this retained cash.

Through January 28, 2017, on an inception to date basis, we have made voluntary prepayments totaling $130,000 in the aggregate on the original $175,000 Term Loan Facility entered into on November 27, 2013, with no such prepayments made during fiscal 2016. As of January 28, 2017 we had $170 million$45,000 of debt outstanding onunder the Term Loan Facility.

Sun Promissory Notes

On May 2, 2008, Vince Holding Corp. issued the Sun Promissory Notes in amounts totaling $300.0 million. The unpaid principal balance of the note accrued interest at 12% per annum until the maturity date of October 15, 2016, at which point any unpaid principal balance of the note would have accrued interest at a rate of 14% per annum until the note was paid in full. No interest was paid on the Sun Promissory Notes.

On December 28, 2012, all interest accrued under the note prior to July 19, 2012 was waived. This resulted in an increase to additional paid-in-capital in the amount of $270.8 million as both parties were under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital.

Effective June 18, 2013, an affiliate of Sun Capital contributed $407.5 million of indebtedness under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement and the Sun Promissory Notes as a capital contribution to Vince Holding Corp., and as a result, no amount remains outstanding under either instrument.

Sun Capital Loan Agreement

Vince Holding Corp. was party to the Sun Capital Loan Agreement with SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC (“SCSF Finance”) and Sun Kellwood Finance (as successors to Bank of Montreal) for a $72.0 million line of credit. Under the terms of this agreement, as amended from time to time, interest accrued at the greater of prime plus 2% per annum or LIBOR plus 4.75% per annum and was due by the last day of each fiscal quarter.

On December 28, 2012, Sun Kellwood Finance and SCSF Finance waived all interest capitalized and accrued under the loan authorization agreement prior to July 19, 2012 (which was the scheduled maturity date). As all parties were under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital, this transaction resulted in a capital contribution of $18.2 million, which was recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in-capital as of February 2, 2013.

Effective June 18, 2013, an affiliate of Sun Capital contributed $407.5 million of indebtedness under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement and the Sun Promissory Notes as a capital contribution to Vince Holding Corp., and as a result, no amount remains outstanding under either instrument.

Credit Facilities and Debt Prior to IPO and Restructuring Transactions which occurred on November 27, 2013

Wells Fargo Facility

On October 19, 2011 Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as agent, and lenders from time to time party thereto. The Wells Fargo Facility provided a non-amortizing senior revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $155.0 million. The borrowings were secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of the borrowers, including the assets of Vince, LLC. Borrowings bore interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin (generally 1.25%-1.75% per annum plus, at the borrowers’ election, LIBOR or a Base Rate). On November 27, 2013, in connection with the consummation of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the Credit Agreement was amended and restated in accordance with its terms. After giving effect to such amendment and restatement, neither Vince Holding Corp. nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

Cerberus Term Loan

On October 19, 2011, Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a Term Loan Agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”), as amended, with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as agent and the lenders from time to time party thereto. The Term Loan Agreement provided the borrowers with a non-amortizing secured term loan in an aggregate amount of $55.0 million (the “Cerberus Term Loan”), of

which $10.0 million was repaid during fiscal 2012. All borrowings under the Cerberus Term Loan bore interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin (10.25%-11.25% per annum for LIBOR Rate Loans and 8.25%-8.75% for Reference Rate Loans) plus, at the borrower’s election, LIBOR or a Reference Rate as defined in the Term Loan Agreement. The Term Loan Agreement also provided for a portion of such interest equal to 1.0% per annum to be paid-in-kind and added to the principal amount of such term loans. The Cerberus Term Loan was secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the borrowers, including the assets of Vince, LLC. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the Cerberus Term Loan was repaid with the proceeds from the Kellwood Note Receivable, as such neither Vince Holding Corp. nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

Sun Term Loan Agreements

Since fiscal year 2009, Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into various term loan agreements (“Sun Term Loan Agreements”) with affiliates of Sun Capital, as lenders, and Sun Kellwood Finance, as collateral agent. The Sun Term Loan Agreements were secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the borrowers, which included the assets of Vince, LLC, which security interest was contractually subordinated to the security interests of the lenders under Wells Fargo Facility and the Cerberus Term Loan. The borrowings under the Sun Term Loan Agreements bore interest at a rate per annum of 5.0%-6.0%, paid-in-kind and added to the principal amount of such term loans. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the obligations under the Sun Term Loan Agreements were discharged through (i) the application of Kellwood Note Receivable proceeds and (ii) capital contributions by Sun Capital affiliates, as such neither Vince Holding Corp. nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

12.875% Notes

Interest on the 12.875% Second-Priority Senior Secured Payment-In-Kind Notes due 2014 (the “12.875% Notes”) of Kellwood Company was paid (a) in cash at a rate of 7.875% per annum payable in January and July; and (b) in the form of PIK interest at a rate of 5.0% per annum (“PIK Interest”) payable either by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding 12.875% Notes, or by issuing additional 12.875% Notes with a principal amount equal to the PIK Interest accrued for the interest period. The 12.875% Notes were guaranteed by various of Kellwood Company’s subsidiaries on a secured basis (including the assets of Vince, LLC), which security interest was contractually subordinated to security interests of lenders under the Wells Fargo Facility, the Cerberus Term Loan and the Sun Term Loan Agreements. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the 12.875% Notes were redeemed with proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable, at which time Vince, LLC was released as a guarantor and the obligations under the indenture were satisfied and discharged.

7.625% Notes

Interest on the 7.625% 1997 Debentures due October 15, 2017 of Kellwood Company (the “7.625% Notes”) is payable in April and October. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and as an early settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) approximately $33.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. On December 12, 2013, as part of the final settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) an additional approximately $4.6 million in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. After giving effect to these settlements, approximately $48.8 million of the 7.625% Notes remain issued and outstanding; provided, that neither Vince Holding Corp. nor its subsidiaries are a guarantor or obligor of such notes.

Outlook

Currently, our short-term and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from debt service, amounts payable under our Tax Receivable Agreements, capital expenditures and working capital requirements associated with

our growth strategies. Management believes that our current balances of cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations and amounts available under the Revolving Credit Facility will be adequate to fund our debt service requirements, obligations under our Tax Receivable Agreement, planned capital expenditures and working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. Our ability to make planned capital expenditures, to fund our debt service requirements and to remain in compliance with our financial covenants, and to fund operations depends on our future operating performance, which in turn, may be impacted by prevailing economic conditions and other financial and business factors, some of which are beyond our control.

Capital expenditures are expected to increase as we invest in the direct-to-consumer store expansion and wholesale shop-in-shop buildout. In fiscal 2014, we project capital expenditures to aggregate $15.0 million to $20.0 million, including $6.0 million to $7.0 million for new and remodeled stores, approximately $4.0 million to $5.0 million on new and updated store-in-store locations and the remainder for other corporate activities, including our new corporate headquarters office and showroom space in New York City.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Vince Holding Corp.We did not have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes during the periods presented herein.

40


Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of February 1, 2014 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:January 28, 2017:

 

   Future payments due by period(1) 
(In thousands)  Less than
1 Year
   1 – 3 Years   3 – 5 Years   After
5 Years
   Total 

Operating lease obligations

  $10,124    $22,565    $21,433    $40,720    $94,842  

Unrecognized tax benefits(2)

          

Employment contracts(3)

   363     —       —       —       363  

Long-term debt obligations

   —       —       1,500     168,500     170,000  

Interest on long-term debt (4)

          

Tax Receivable Agreement(5)

   4,131     —       —       —       173,146  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $14,618    $22,565    $22,933    $209,220    $438,351  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Future payments due by period

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2018-2019

 

 

2020-2021

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

Unrecorded contractual obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease obligations

 

$

21,096

 

 

$

41,795

 

 

$

37,147

 

 

$

50,753

 

 

$

150,791

 

 

Other contractual obligations (1)

 

 

36,617

 

 

 

4,024

 

 

 

1,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,294

 

 

Recorded contractual obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt obligations

 

 

 

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

5,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,200

 

 

Tax Receivable Agreement (2)

 

 

2,788

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140,618

 

 

Total

 

$

60,501

 

 

$

90,819

 

 

$

44,000

 

 

$

50,753

 

 

$

383,903

 

 

 

(1)

Vince, LLC has entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood Company, LLC pursuant to which Kellwood provides support services in various operational areas including, among other things, distribution, information technology

Consists primarily of inventory purchase obligations and back office support (as described in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Shared Services Agreement”). We have excluded the amounts due under such agreement as from the table herein as we cannot precisely estimate the future payments to be made thereunder and timing thereof. However, we currently expect to pay between $9.0 million to $11.0 million on an annualized basis for services provided by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement.service contracts.

(2)

As of February 1, 2014, we have recorded $3.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties. We are unable to make reliable estimates of cash flows by period due to the inherent uncertainty surrounding the effective settlement of these positions.
(3)We have entered into agreements with certain employees to provide for relocation benefits.
(4)The Term Loan Facility has interest payable at LIBOR (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus 5.00% or the base rate (subject to a 2% floor) plus 3.00%.
(5)Vince Holding Corp.

VHC entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders (as described in “Shared Services Agreement” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” ofNote 12 “Related Party Transactions” within the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.)10-K). We cannot, however, reliably estimate in which future periods these amounts would become due, other than those amounts expected to be paid within one year. The amount set forth in this linethe “Total” column represents 85% of the value of these net tax assetsremaining obligation as of January 28, 2017 under the time when the Vince and non-Vince businesses were separated on November 27, 2013.Tax Receivable Agreement.

The summary above does not include the following items:

As of January 28, 2017, we have recorded $2,339 of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties. We are unable to make reliable estimates of cash flows by period due to the inherent uncertainty surrounding the effective settlement of these positions.

Interest payable under the Term Loan Facility, which is calculated at a rate of either (i) the Eurodollar rate (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus an applicable margin of 4.75% to 5.00% based on a consolidated net total leverage ratio or (ii) the base rate applicable margin of 3.75% to 4.00% based on a consolidated net total leverage ratio.

Interest payable under the Revolving Credit facility, which is calculated at either the LIBOR or the Base Rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin of 1.25% to 1.75% for LIBOR loans or 0.25% to 0.75% for Base Rate loans, and in each case subject to a pricing grid based on an average daily excess availability calculation. The “Base Rate” means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by BofA as its prime rate; (ii) the Federal Funds Rate for such day, plus 0.50%; and (iii) the LIBOR Rate for a one month interest period as determined on such day, plus 1.0%.

Seasonality

The apparel and fashion industry in which we operate is cyclical and, consequently, our revenues are affected by general economic conditions and the seasonal trends characteristic to the apparel and fashion industry. Purchases of apparel are sensitive to a number of factors that influence the level of consumer spending, including economic conditions and the level of disposable consumer income, consumer debt, interest rates and consumer confidence as well as the impact of adverse weather conditions. In addition, fluctuations in the amount of sales in any fiscal quarter are affected by the timing of seasonal wholesale shipments and other events affecting direct-to-consumer sales; as such, the financial results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of results for the fiscal year. We expect such seasonality to continue.

Inflation

While inflation may impact our sales, cost of goods sold and expenses, we believe the effects of inflation on our results of operations and financial condition are not significant. While it is difficult to accurately measure the impact of inflation, management believes it has not been significant and cannot provide any assurances that our results of operations and financial condition will not be materially impacted by inflation in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to be

41


reasonable under the circumstances and evaluates these estimates on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The following critical accounting policespolicies reflect the significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. With respect to critical accounting policies, even a relatively minor variance between actual and expected experience can potentially have a materially favorable or unfavorable impact on subsequent consolidated results of operations. For more information on our accounting policies, please refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Reserves for Allowances

Sales are recognized when goods are shipped in accordance with customer orders for the wholesale andbusiness, upon receipt by the customer for the e-commerce businesses,business, and at the time of sale to consumerconsumers for the retail business. The estimated amounts of sales discounts, returns and allowances are accounted for as reductions of sales when the associated sale occurs. These estimated amounts are adjusted periodically based on changes in facts and circumstances when the changes become known. Accrued discounts, returns and allowances are included as an offset to accounts receivable.

Accounts Receivable—Reserves for Allowance

Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for expected future chargebacks and margin support from wholesale partners. It is the nature of the apparel industry that suppliers like us face significant pressure from wholesale partners in the retail industry to provide allowances to compensate for their margin shortfalls. This pressure often takes the form of customers requiring us to provide price concessions on prior shipments as a prerequisite for obtaining future orders. Pressure for these concessions is largely determined by overall retail sales performance and, more specifically, the performance of our products at retail. To the extent our wholesale partners have more of our goods on hand at the end of the season, there will be greater pressure for us to grant markdown concessions on prior shipments. Our accounts receivable balances are reported net of expected allowances for these matters based on the historical level of concessions required and our estimates of the level of markdowns and allowances that will be required in the coming season in order to collect the receivables.season. We evaluate the allowance balances on a continual basis and adjust them as necessary to reflect changes in anticipated allowance activity. We also provide an allowance for sales returns based on historical return rates.

Accounts Receivable—AllowanceAt January 28, 2017, a hypothetical 1% change in the reserves for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtfulallowances would have resulted in a change of $197 in accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from wholesale partners that are unable to meet their financial obligations. Our estimation of the allowance for doubtful accounts involves consideration of the financial condition of specific customers as well as general estimates of future collectability based on historical experience and expected future trends. The estimation of these factors involves significant judgment. In addition, actual collection experience, and thus bad debt expense, can be significantly impacted by the financial difficulties of as few as one customer.

net sales.

Inventory Valuation

Inventory values are reduced to net realizable value when there are factors indicating that certain inventories will not be sold on terms sufficient to recover their cost. Our products can be classified into two types: replenishment and non-replenishment. Replenishment items are those basics that are not highly seasonal or dependent on fashion trends. The same products are sold by retailers 12 months a year and styles evolve slowly. Retailers generally replenish their stocks of these items as they are sold. Only a relatively small portion of our business involves replenishment items.

The majority of our products consist of items that are non-replenishment as a result of being tied to a season. For these products, the selling season generally ranges from three to six months. The value of this seasonal merchandise might be sufficient for us to generate a profit over its cost throughout the season, but after its season a few months later the same inventory might be saleable at less than cost. The value may rise again the following year when the season in which the goods sell approaches—or it may not, depending on the level of prior year merchandise on the market and on year-to-year fashion changes.

The majority of out-of-seasonOut-of-season inventories may be sold to off-price retailers and other customers who serve a customer base that will purchase prior year fashions in addition to liquidationand may be liquidated through our Vince outlets.outlets and our e-commerce website. The amount, if any, that these customers will pay for prior year fashions is determined by the desirability of the inventory itself as well as the general level of prior year goods available to these customers. The assessment of inventory value, as a result, is highly subjective and requires an assessment of the seasonality of the inventory, its future desirability, and future price levels in the off-price sector.

ManyIn our wholesale business, some of our products are purchased for and sold to specific customers’ orders. OthersFor the remainder of our business, products are purchased in anticipation of selling them to a specific customer based on historical trends. The loss of a major customer, whether due to the customer’s financial difficulty or other reasons, could have a significant negative impact on the value of the inventory expected to be sold to that customer. This negative impact can also extend to purchase obligations for goods that have not yet been received. These obligations involve product to be received into inventory over the next one to six months.

Deferred RentAt January 28, 2017, a hypothetical 1% change in the inventory obsolescence reserve would have resulted in a change of $21 in inventory, net and Deferred Lease Incentivescost of products sold.

We lease various office spaces, showrooms and retail stores. Many of these operating leases contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals during the original term of the lease. For these leases, we recognize the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease and record the difference between the amount charged to operations and amounts paid as deferred rent. Certain of our retail store leases contain provisions for contingent rent, typically a percentage of retail sales once a predetermined threshold has been met. These amounts are expensed as incurred. Additionally, we received lease incentives in certain leases. These allowances have been deferred and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease as a reduction of rent expense.

Fair Value Assessments of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually and in an interim period if a triggering event occurs. We completed our annual impairment testing on our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assetsasset during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2013,2016, fiscal 20122015 and fiscal 2011.2014.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to ASC Topic 350Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. Under this amendment, anAn entity may elect to perform a qualitative impairment assessment for goodwill.goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. If adverse trends are identified during the qualitative assessment that indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test is required. “Step

“Step one” of thisthe quantitative impairment test for goodwill requires thatan entity to determine the fair

value of theeach reporting unit be estimated and comparedcompare such fair value to itsthe respective carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset,reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired, and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, “step two” of the impairment test is performed in order to calculatedetermine the amount of the impairment loss. An“Step two” of the goodwill impairment test includes valuing the tangible and intangible

42


assets of the impaired reporting unit based on the fair value determined in “step one” and calculating the fair value of the impaired reporting unit's goodwill based upon the residual of the summed identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. The goodwill impairment test is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth, profitability and cash flows, discount rates and other variables. We base our estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.  

We estimate the fair value of our tradename intangible asset using a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, which is based on the “relief from royalty” methodology.  This methodology assumes that in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these types of assets. The relief from royalty approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates and other variables.  We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the tradename intangible asset is recognized to the extentless than the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value.

An entity may pass on performing the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset and directly perform “step one” of the quantitative assessment. This determination can be made on an asset by asset basis, and an entity may resume performing a qualitative assessment in subsequent periods. The amendment is effective for annual and interim impairment tests for goodwill performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this amendment during fiscal 2012.

In fiscal 20132016, a quantitative impairment test on goodwill determined that the fair value of our Direct-to-consumer reporting unit was below its carrying value. During fiscal 2016, the sales results within the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit were impacted by continued declines in average order values as well as declines in the number of transactions due to lower conversion rates and reduced traffic and as a result, the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit has not met expectations, resulting in lower current and expected future cash flows. We estimated the fair value of our Direct-to-consumer reporting unit using both the income and market valuation approaches, with a weighting of 80% and 20%, respectively. “Step one” of the assessment determined that the fair value of the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit was below the carrying amount by approximately 40%. Accordingly, “step two” of the assessment was performed, which compared the implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying value of such goodwill by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation using the fair value of the reporting unit determined in “step one”. Based on the results from “step two,” we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $22,311 to write-off all of the goodwill in our Direct-to-consumer reporting unit. The charge was recorded within Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012,2016. Additionally, the results of “step one” of the assessment determined that the fair value of the Wholesale reporting unit exceeded its fair value by approximately 40% and therefore did not result in any impairment of goodwill. However, further declines in the net sales or operating results of the Wholesale reporting unit may result in a partial or full impairment of its goodwill, which amounted to $41,435 as of January 28, 2017. Significant assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis included a discount rate of 16.0%. Significant assumptions utilized in a market-based approach were market multiples ranging from 0.50x to 0.90x for the Company’s reporting units.

In fiscal 2015, we performedelected to perform a quantitative impairment test on goodwill. The results of the quantitative test did not result in any impairment of goodwill because the fair values of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values. The fair values of the Company’s reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by at least 15% as of the date of the impairment test. Significant assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis included discount rates that ranged from 16.0% to 17.0%. Significant assumptions utilized in a market-based approach were market multiples ranging from 0.85x to 0.95x for the Company’s reporting units.

In fiscal 2014 we elected to perform a qualitative assessment on the goodwill and determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value of the reporting unit was greater than the fair value. In fiscal 2011, we performed “step one” of the impairment test for the goodwill rather than electing early adoption of the guidance noted above due to the additional capitalized contingent purchase price. We estimated the fair value of the reporting unit primarily based on an income approach, which uses discounted cash flow assumptions. The implied fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the book value. As such, we were not required to perform “step two” of the impairment test.

In July 2012, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwillfiscal 2016, a quantitative assessment on our indefinite-lived intangible asset, which consists of the Vince tradename, determined that the fair value of our tradename intangible asset was below its carrying value. During fiscal 2016, our sales results have not met expectations resulting in lower current and Other (Topic 350):Testing Indefinite Lived Assets forexpected future cash flows. We estimated the fair value of our tradename intangible asset using a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, which is based on the “relief from royalty” methodology and determined that the fair value of our tradename intangible asset was below the carrying amount by approximately 30%. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge of $30,750, which was recorded within Impairment. Under this amendment, of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Discount rate assumptions were based on an entity may electassessment of the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the intangible asset. Also subject to judgment are assumptions about royalty rates, which were based on the estimated rates at which similar tradenames are being licensed in the marketplace.

In fiscal 2015 we elected to perform a qualitativequantitative assessment on our tradename intangible asset. The results of the quantitative test did not result in any impairment assessment for indefinite-lived intangible assets similar tobecause the goodwill impairment testing guidance discussed above.

An entity may pass on performingfair value of the qualitative assessment for an indefinite-livedCompany’s tradename intangible asset and directly perform “step one”exceeded its carrying value. The estimate of fair value of the tradename intangible asset was determined using a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, which was based on the “relief from royalty” methodology. Discount rate assumptions were based on an assessment of the assessment. This determination can be maderisk inherent in

43


the projected future cash flows generated by the intangible asset. Also subject to judgment are assumptions about royalty rates, which were based on an asset by asset basis, and an entity may resume performing a qualitative assessmentthe estimated rates at which similar tradenames are being licensed in subsequent periods. The amendment is effective for annual and interim impairment tests for indefinite-lived intangible assets performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. We early adopted this amendment during fiscal 2012.the marketplace.

In fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012,2014, we elected to perform a qualitative assessment on indefinite-livedthe tradename intangible assetsasset and determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value of the assetsasset exceeded the fair value. In fiscal 2011, we performed “step one”

Property and Equipment and Other Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

The Company reviews its property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets for impairment when management determines that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable due to events or changes in circumstances. Recoverability of these assets is evaluated by comparing the carrying value of the asset with estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the comparisons indicate that the value of the asset is not recoverable, an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. We estimatedloss is calculated as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets primarily basedasset and the loss is recognized during that period. During fiscal 2016, we recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $2,082, within SG&A expenses on a relief from royalty model, which uses revenue projections, royalty ratesthe Consolidated Statements of Operations, related to the impairment of property and discount ratesequipment of certain retail stores with carrying values that were determined not to estimatebe recoverable and exceeded fair value. The implied fairPrior to the impairment charge, these retail stores had a total net book value of the assets exceeded the book value, as such we were$3,124. The Company did not required to perform “step two” of therecord any significant impairment test.charges in fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014.

Determining the fair value of goodwill and other intangible assets is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. It is possible that estimates of future operating results could change adversely and impact the evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets and that the effect of such changes could be material.

Definite-livedFinite-lived intangible assets are comprised of customer relationships and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives of 20 years.

Provision for incomeIncome taxes and Valuation Allowances

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted rates. We determineassess the appropriatenesslikelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and adjust the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowances in accordance withallowance to the “moreextent we believe it more likely than not” recognition criteria.not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including recent earnings results within taxing jurisdictions, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available and other relevant factors. Changes in the required valuation allowance are recorded in income in the period such determination is made. Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. Changes in estimates may create volatility in our effective tax rate in future periods for various reasons, including changes in tax laws or rates, changes in forecasted amounts of pretax income (loss), settlements with various tax authorities, either favorable or unfavorable, the expiration of the statute of limitations on some tax positions and obtaining new information about particular tax positions that may cause management to change its estimates. The ultimate tax outcome is uncertain for certain transactions. We recognize tax positions in our

Consolidated Balance Sheets as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

Due to the uncertain nature of the realization of our deferred income tax assets, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded valuation allowances in the amount of $121,836, within Provision for income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, due to the combination of (i) a current year pretax loss, including goodwill and tradename impairment charges; (ii) levels of projected pre-tax income; and (iii) the Company’s ability to carry forward or carry back tax losses. This valuation allowance is subject to periodic review, and, if the allowance is reduced, the tax benefit will be recorded in future operations as a reduction of our income tax expense.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information on certain recently issued or proposed accounting standards which may impact Vince Holding Corp., please refer to the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Our principal market risk relates to interest rate sensitivity, which is the risk that changes in interest rates will reduce our net income or net assets. Our variable rate debt consists of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility. Our current interest rate on the Term Loan Facility is based on the Eurodollar rate (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus an applicable margin of 4.75% to 5.00%,. Our interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility is based on the Eurodollar rate or the base rate (subjectBase Rate (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) with applicable margins subject to a 2.00% floor) plus 3.00%. Apricing grid based on excess availability. As of January 28, 2017, a one percentage point increase in the interest rate on our variable rate debt would result in additional interest expense of approximately $1.7 million$502 for the $170 million$50,200 borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility as of such date, calculated on an annual basis.

We do not believeexpect that foreign currency risk, commodity price or inflation risks are expected to be material to our business or our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Substantially all of our foreign sales and purchases are made in U.S. dollars.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.44


ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

See “Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements,” which is located on page F-1 appearing at the end of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires that we include these certifications with this report. This Controls and Procedures section includes information concerning the disclosure controls and procedures referred to in the certifications. You should read this section in conjunction with the certifications.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of February 1, 2014.January 28, 2017.

We evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on at least a quarterly basis. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures arewere not effective due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which is described below under “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

As a result of the material weaknesses identified, we performed additional analysis, substantive testing and other post-closing procedures intended to ensure information is recorded, processed, summarizedthat our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the consolidated financial statements and reported withinrelated notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

presented.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and well operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. We have also designed our disclosure controls and procedures based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no changeSince the IPO, the Company had been in the process of transitioning certain functions performed by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement and during the quarter ended January 28, 2017, the Company completed the transition of all such functions and systems from Kellwood to the Company’s own systems or processes as well as to third-party service providers. Functions that transitioned to the Company, including its third-party service providers, included accounting related functions, tax, accounts payable, credit and collections, e-commerce customer service, distribution and logistics, payroll and benefits administration, and information technology support. Additionally, the Company has completed the implementation of its own enterprise resource planning and supporting systems, point-of-sale system, third-party e-commerce platform, human resource payroll and recruitment systems, distribution applications, and network infrastructure. As a result, we have updated our internal controls over financial reporting, as necessary, to accommodate modifications to our business processes and accounting procedures.

As described in the preceding paragraph, there were changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our latest fiscal quarter that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

This annual reportManagement, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

45


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of January 28, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective, as management identified deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that were determined to be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of an entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

We did not design and implement effective control over risk assessment with regard to our processes and procedures commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, which deficiency was identified as a material weakness. Specifically, we did not maintain appropriate corporate governance and oversight, change management and system implementation controls intended to address the risks associated with the implementation of our ERP and payroll systems and to timely identify and appropriately mitigate such risk prior to transitioning to the new systems.

The risk assessment material weakness contributed to a second material weakness related to the design and maintenance of information technology (“IT”) general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of financial statements. Specifically, the Company did not (i) maintain program change management controls to ensure that information technology program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records were tested, approved and implemented appropriately; and (ii) maintain adequate user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and to adequately restrict access to financial applications and data.

These material weaknesses could impact the effectiveness of IT-dependent controls (such as automated controls that address the risk of material misstatement to one or more assertions, along with the IT controls and underlying data that support the effectiveness of system-generated data and reports) and could result in misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement line items and disclosures, which would not be prevented or detected.

Because we are an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include aan attestation report of management’sour independent registered public accounting firm.

Remediation Plan

Management has initiated a remediation plan to address the control deficiencies that led to the material weaknesses. The remediation plan includes, but is not limited to:

The enhancement of our risk assessment regardingand governance controls related to managing information technology development and related organizational change. This includes establishment of an IT Steering Committee, which will adopt comprehensive information technology governance policies and procedures, perform a robust IT risk assessment and implement an improved IT organizational structure;

The development of information technology processes and procedures to appropriately monitor data processing and system interfaces;

The implementation of (i) controls to ensure that only appropriate system access rights are granted to system users; and (ii) controls related to routine reviews of user system access; and

The implementation of appropriate segregation of duties in all systems that impact internal control over financial reporting or an attestation reportreporting.

Our goal is to implement these control improvements during fiscal 2017 and to fully remediate these material weaknesses by the end of 2017, subject to there being sufficient opportunities to conclude, through testing, that the company’s registered public accounting firm dueimplemented controls are operating effectively. Until the controls are remediated, we will continue to a transition period established by rules of the Securitiesperform additional analysis, substantive testing and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.other post-closing procedures to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

46


Part PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE.

BelowThe information required by this Item is a list of names, ages and a brief overview ofincorporated herein by reference from the business experience of our directors, executive officers and members of senior management as of March 28, 2014:

Name

Age

Position/Title

Christopher T. Metz

48Director and Chairman

Mark E. Brody

52Director

Jason H. Neimark

43Director

Jerome Griffith

55Director

Robert A. Bowman

58Director

Jill Granoff

51Director and Chief Executive Officer

Lisa Klinger

47Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Karin Gregersen

44President and Chief Creative Officer

Beth Cohn

46Senior Vice President, Retail and E-Commerce

Rebecca Damavandi

41Group President, Global Business Development

Jay Dubiner

50Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Deena Gianoncelli

40Senior Vice President, Human Resources

Michele Sizemore

50Senior Vice President, Operations

Jill Steinberg

37Senior Vice President, Wholesale

Directors, Executive Officers and Senior Management

We believe that our board of directors shouldCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be composed of individuals with knowledge and experience in many substantive areas that impact our business. The following areas are the most important to us: fashion and consumer goods; retail and wholesale; marketing and merchandising; sales and distribution; international business development; strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; accounting, finance, and capital structure; legal/regulatory and government affairs; talent management; and board practices of other major corporations. We believe that all of our current board members possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service, and have highlighted in the individual biographies below the specific experience, attributes, and skills that led to the conclusion that each board member should serve as a director.

Christopher T. Metz. Mr. Metz has served as a director since 2008 and as the Chairman of our board of directors since November 2013. Mr. Metz has served as Managing Director of Sun Capital since 2005 and has extensive global operating and leadership experience in the consumer and durable goods industries. Prior to joining Sun Capital, Mr. Metz was President at Black & Decker, leading its Hardware and Home Improvement Group from 1999 to 2005. During his 13 years at Black & Decker, Mr. Metz held various other senior leadership positions, including President of Kwikset Corporation, President of Price Pfister faucets, President of Baldwin Hardware, and General Manager of European Professional Power Tools and Accessories, based in Frankfurt, Germany. Mr. Metz also serves on several boards of Sun Capital portfolio companies, including Avion Services Group Holding Corp., Captain D’s Holding Corp., Friendly’s Ice Cream LLC, Grandy’s Holding Corp., Lexington Furniture Industries, Inc., Pemco World Air Services, Inc., Rowe Fine Furniture, Inc., and SK Financial Services Corp. Mr. Metz also served on the board of Amicus Wind Down Corporation, a public company, from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Metz brings to our board extensive public company and international leadership experience.

Mark E. Brody. Mr. Brody has served as a director since 2008. Mr. Brody has served as a Managing Director and Group Chief Financial Officer of Sun Capital since 2006. Prior to joining Sun Capital, Mr. Brody

served from 2001 to 2006 as Chief Financial Officer for Flight Options, a leading provider of fractional jet services. Prior to Flight Options, he served as Chief Financial Officer or Vice President, Finance for manufacturing-related public companies, including Sudbury, Inc., Essef Corporation, Anthony & Sylvan Pools, and Waterlink, Inc. Mr. Brody also serves on several boards of Sun Capital portfolio companies, including Limited Stores Company, LLC, Cello-Foil Products, Inc., Emerald Performance Materials LLC, Exopack Holding Corp., Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp., and TPG Enterprises, Inc. Mr. Brody started his career as an auditor with Ernst & Young. Mr. Brody brings to the board significant experience in finance, accounting and corporate strategy development.

Jason H. Neimark. Mr. Neimark has served as a director since May 2013. Mr. Neimark has served as a Managing Director of Sun Capital since 2001. Mr. Neimark has led more than 65 buyout and capital markets transactions in a broad range of industries on behalf of affiliates of Sun Capital in the U.S. and Europe. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Neimark was a Principal and President of K&D Distributors, a national direct marketer and specialty distributor of optical products where he led a financial and operational turnaround which concluded in a successful sale. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Neimark served as a principal of Midwest Mezzanine Funds, a provider of junior capital to middle market businesses. After receiving his CPA designation in 1992, Mr. Neimark worked as a tax consultant and auditor for KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Neimark also serves on several boards of Sun Capital portfolio companies, including Gordmans Stores Inc. Mr. Neimark was a director of Accuride Corporation, a public company, from February 2009 to October 2009. Since February 1, 2014, he has served as a director of Loud Technologies, a private company, where he previously served as a director from May 2005 to July 2008. Mr. Neimark provides strong finance skills to our board of directors and valuable experience gained from previous board service.

Jerome Griffith. Mr. Griffith has served as a director since November 2013. Mr. Griffith has served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the board of directors of Tumi Holding, Inc. since April 2009. From 2002 to February 2009, Mr. Griffith was employed at Esprit Holdings Limited, a global fashion brand, where he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer and appointed to the board of directors in 2004, then promoted to President of Esprit North and South America in 2006. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Griffith worked as an Executive Vice President at Tommy Hilfiger. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Griffith worked as the President of Retail at the J. Peterman Company, a catalog-based apparel and retail company. From 1989 through 1998, Mr. Griffith worked in various positions at Gap, Inc. Mr. Griffith brings to our board experience as a public company director, experience as a senior executive of a major global consumer products company and a proven track record of innovation and driving international growth and expansion.

Robert A. Bowman. Mr. Bowman has served as a director since November 2013. Mr. Bowman currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Major League Baseball Advanced Media (“MLB.com”), the Internet and interactive media unit of Major League Baseball. Prior to joining MLB.com in November 2000, Mr. Bowman was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cyberian Outpost, Inc., an online retailer of computers and electronics. Before joining Cyberian Outpost in September 1999, Mr. Bowman held several senior management positions at ITT Corporation, including President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Earlier in his career, Mr. Bowman served for eight years as Treasurer of the State of Michigan. Mr. Bowman is currently a director and chairman of the audit committee of Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. Mr. Bowman previously served as a director of Warnaco Group, Inc. from 2004 to 2013, Director of Blockbuster, Inc. from 2003 to 2010 and director of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. from 2003 to 2008. Mr. Bowman brings to our board experience as a public company director and extensive financial experience in both the public and private sectors.

Jill Granoff. Ms. Granoff has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since May 2012. Previously, Ms. Granoff served as Chief Executive Officer of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., a designer and marketer of women’s and men’s apparel, footwear and accessories, from 2008 until 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Granoff served as Executive Vice President of Liz Claiborne Inc. where she had global responsibility for Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand Jeans, Kate Spade and the company’s e-commerce and outlet businesses. Prior to joining Liz Claiborne, Ms. Granoff was President and Chief Operating Officer of Victoria Secret Beauty, a

division of Limited Brands, where she worked from 1999 to 2006. From 1990 to 1999, Ms. Granoff held various executive positions at The Estée Lauder Companies. Ms. Granoff is a member of the board of directors of Demandware and the Fashion Institute of Technology Foundation. Ms. Granoff brings significant senior leadership, operating and industry experience to our board of directors. Ms. Granoff’s position as our Chief Executive Officer also allows her to advise the board of directors on management’s perspective over a full range of issues affecting the Company.

Lisa Klinger. Ms. Klinger has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since December 2012. Previously, Ms. Klinger served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Fresh Market, Inc., a specialty retailer, from 2009 until 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Klinger served as interim Chief Financial Officer of Michael’s Stores during 2008 and Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer from 2005 to 2009. Ms. Klinger previously served as Assistant Treasurer at Limited Brands from 2000 to 2005.

Karin Gregersen. Ms. Gregersen has served as our President since May 2013 and as our President and Chief Creative Officer since October 2013. Previously, Ms. Gregersen worked at Chloé/Richemont for 13 years, where she last served as the Executive Vice President and Managing Director of Chloé/Richemont Americas from 2007 to 2013. Prior to this role, she served as the Sales and Marketing Director for Chloé/Richemont Europe/Middle East from 1999 to 2007. Ms. Gregersen previously served as the Europe Sales Manager for Givenchy from 1997 to 1999.

Beth Cohn. Ms. Cohn has served as our Senior Vice President of Retail and E-Commerce since June 2012. Previously, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President of Retail for Theory and Helmut Lang from 2009 to 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Cohn served as General Manager of Retail and Vice President for Juicy Couture from 2006 to 2009 and General Merchandise Manager, Retail and Senior Vice President for Prada North America from 1997 to 2006.

Rebecca Damavandi. Ms. Damavandi has served as our Group President of Global Business Development since August 2012. Previously, Ms. Damavandi worked as a self-employed global apparel consultant from 2010 to 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Damavandi served as President of Licensing and Global Business Development for Elie Tahari from 2006 to 2010, Vice President of International and Licensing for Earl Jeans/VF Corporation from 2004 to 2006 and Senior Director of Global Product Licensing for Guess?, Inc. from 1999 to 2003, after joining the company in 1996.

Jay Dubiner. Mr. Dubiner has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since September 2013. Previously, Mr. Dubiner served as the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of The Warnaco Group, Inc. from 2008 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Dubiner served as Of Counsel for Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP from 2006 until 2008. Previously, he held the position of Executive Vice President, Corporate Development & General Counsel for Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. from 2004 until 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Dubiner provided legal and corporate development consulting services to clients primarily in the media industry. From 2000 to 2002, he served as Senior Vice President, Business Development & Strategic Planning for a division of The Universal Music Group. Mr. Dubiner was an associate in the corporate department of the New York law firm of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison from 1993 to 2000.

Deena Gianoncelli. Ms. Gianoncelli began serving as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources in September 2013. Previously, Ms. Gianoncelli served as Director of Human Resources for Amazon.com from 2012 to 2013. Prior to that, Ms. Gianoncelli served as the Vice President of Human Resources for Hugo Boss Americas from 2010 to 2012. In addition, Ms. Gianoncelli served as Senior Director of Human Resources for Medco Health Solutions from 2005 to 2010.

Michele SizemoreMs. Sizemore has served as our Senior Vice President, Operations since May 2013. Previously, Ms. Sizemore worked at Gap, Inc. for 20 years, where she last served as Senior Vice President of

Global Sourcing for the Gap brand worldwide from 2011 to 2013. Prior to that, she served as Vice President of Global Sourcing for Banana Republic from 2009 to 2011.

Jill Steinberg. Ms. Steinberg has served as our Senior Vice President, Wholesale since March 2013. Previously, Ms. Steinberg served as our Senior Vice President, Women’s Sales from 2012 to 2013. Prior to that, Ms. Steinberg served as Vice President of Sales for Diane von Furstenberg from 2005 to 2012. Previously, Ms. Steinberg served as Senior Account Executive for BCBG from 2003 to 2005 and Senior Account Executive for Theory from 2001 to 2003.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers or directors.

Corporate Governance

Board Composition

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our board of directors shall consist of such number of directors as determined from time to time by resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors then in office. Our board of directors currently consists of seven members; provided that one such seat is currently vacant. Until such time as Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own 30% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, Sun Cardinal, an affiliate of Sun Capital, will have the right to designate a majority of our board of directors under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, provided that, at such time as we are not a “controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards, a majority of our board of directors will be “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of NYSE, subject to the applicable phase-in requirements. Until such time as Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own 30% or more of the voting power of the voting stock then outstanding, Sun Cardinal shall also have the ability to fill any vacancy on our board of directors, whether resulting from an increase to the board size, death, resignation or removal. Thereafter, only our board of directors shall be authorized to fill such vacancies. Additionally, even if Sun Capital and its affiliates cease to beneficially own at least 30% of the voting power of the voting stock then outstanding, directors previously designated by Sun Cardinal shall have the right to serve the remainder of their respective terms, unless they are otherwise removed for cause in accordancefiled with the terms ofSecurities and Exchange Commission in connection with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Our board of directors is divided into three classes, with one class being elected at each year’s2017 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Brody and Mr. Bowman serve as the Class I directors with an initial term expiring in 2015. Messrs. Neimark, and Metz serve as Class II directors with an initial term expiring in 2016. Ms. Granoff and Mr. Griffith serve as Class III directors with an initial term expiring in 2017. Following the expiration of the initial term of a class of directors, each class of directors will serve a three-year term. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directorsOur definitive proxy statement will be distributed amongfiled on or before 120 days after the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consistend of one-third of the total number of directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, officers and owners of more than 10% of any class of our equity securities (“10% beneficial owners”) to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and to furnish us with copies of all forms filed. Prior to our initial public offering, which was consummated on November 27, 2013, we were a privately held company with no class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act. None of our directors, officers or 10% beneficial owners were required to file with the SEC any such reports prior to the IPO. To our knowledge, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners during the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K were met.

Controlled Company

Affiliates of Sun Capital control a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards. As a controlled company, exemptions under the standards free us from the obligation to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements:

fiscal 2016.

that a majority of our board of directors consists of “independent directors,” as defined under the NYSE rules;

that we have a nominating committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;

that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and

that we conduct annual performance evaluations of the nominating committee and compensation committee.

These exemptions do not modify the independence requirements for our Audit Committee. The NYSE rules permit the composition of our Audit Committee to be phased in as follows: (1) one independent committee member at the time of our initial public offering; (2) a majority of independent committee members within 90 days of our initial public offering; and (3) all independent committee members within one year of our initial public offering.

We intend to comply with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules with respect to our Audit Committee as we appointed two independent directors on our Audit Committee at the time of pricing of our initial public offering and intend to appoint the remaining independent director to our Audit Committee within the applicable time frame.

Similarly, once we are no longer a “controlled company,” we must comply with the independent board committee requirements as they relate to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Compensation Committee, on the same phase-in schedule as set forth above, with the trigger date being the date we are no longer a “controlled company”. In addition, we will have 12 months from the date we cease to be a “controlled company” to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors.

Board Committees

The standing committees of our board of directors consist of an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The directors on such committees designated by Sun Cardinal, an affiliate of Sun Capital, constitute a majority of each committee of our board of directors (other than the Audit Committee) and the chairman of each of the committees (other than the Audit Committee) is a director serving on such committee who was selected by Sun Cardinal, provided that, at such time as we are not a “controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards, our committee membership will comply with all the applicable requirements of those standards. The composition, duties and responsibilities of these committees are set forth below. In the future, our board may establish other committees, as it deems appropriate, to assist it with its responsibilities.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other matters: (1) appointing, compensating, retaining, evaluating, terminating and overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm; (2) discussing with our independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management; (3) reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm the scope and results of their audit; (4) approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;

(5) overseeing the financial reporting process and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the interim and annual financial statements that we file with the SEC; (6) reviewing and monitoring our accounting principles, accounting policies, financial and accounting controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (7) establishing procedures for the confidential anonymous submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal controls or auditing matters; and (8) reviewing and approving related person transactions.

Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Bowman, Griffith and Brody. We believe that Messrs. Bowman and Griffith qualify as independent directors according to the rules and regulations of the SEC with respect to audit committee membership. We also believe that Mr. Bowman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. We expect to add an additional independent director to our Audit Committee within one year of the effective date of the registration statement for our initial public offering in order to comply with applicable rules and regulations of NYSE. Our board of directors adopted a new written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our corporate website atwww.vince.com. Our website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other matters: (1) reviewing key corporate compensation goals, policies, plans and programs; (2) reviewing and approving the compensation of our directors, chief executive officer and other named executive officers; (3) reviewing and approving employment agreements and other similar arrangements between us and our named executive officers; and (4) administering stock plans and other incentive compensation plans (including the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and the Vince ESPP, as defined herein).

Our Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Metz, Brody and Neimark. Our board of directors adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our corporate website atwww.vince.com. Our website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other matters: (1) identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors, consistent with criteria approved by our board of directors; (2) overseeing the organization of our board of directors so that it can satisfy its duties and responsibilities properly and efficiently; (3) identifying best practices and recommending corporate governance principles; and (4) developing and recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines and principles applicable to us.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Metz, Brody and Neimark. Our board of directors adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is available on our corporate website atwww.vince.com. Our website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2013, none of our officers or employees served as a member of our Compensation Committee. None of our executive officers currently serve, or in the past has served, as a member of the Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or Compensation Committee or as a director of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Compensation Committee.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and all persons performing similar functions. A copy of that code is available on our

corporate website atwww.vince.com. We expect that any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website. Our website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Risk Oversight

Our board of directors oversees the risk management activities designed and implemented by our management. The board of directors executes its oversight responsibility for risk management both directly and through its committees. The full board of directors also considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic plan, business operations and capital structure. In addition, the board of directors receives detailed regular reports from members of our senior management and other associates that include assessments and potential mitigation of the risks and exposures involved with their respective areas of responsibility.

Our board of directors has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of our risk management process. Our other board committees also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. All committees report to the full board of directors as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.

Other Committees

Our board of directors may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following section provides compensation information pursuant torequired by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the scaled disclosure rules applicable to “emerging growth companies” under the rules of the SEC and may contain statements regarding future individual and company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of the company’s executive compensation program and should not be understoodCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts. Vince’s Named Executive Officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) for fiscal 2013 and the positions they held with us during fiscal 2013 are set forth below:

Jill Granoff, Chief Executive Officer

Lisa Klinger, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Karin Gregersen, President and Chief Creative Officer

This executive compensation section contains certain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans and expectations regarding future compensation plans and arrangements. The actual compensation plans and expectations that we adopt may differ materially from the currently anticipated plans and arrangements as summarized in this discussion.

Overview

Prior to the consummation of our initial public offering in November 2013, we were a privately-held company owned almost exclusively by affiliates of Sun Capital. As a result, we were not subject to any stock exchange listing or SEC rules requiring a majority of our board of directors to be independent or relating to the formation and functioning of board committees, including audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees. As such, all compensation decisions had historically been made by our board of directors.

Additionally, prior to November 2013, the compensation of the executive officers identified under “—Summary Compensation Table” who are referred to as the Named Executive Officers, had consisted of a combination of base salary, bonuses (sign-on, performance based and guaranteed) and long-term incentive compensation in the form of Kellwood stock options issued under its 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “2010 Option Plan”). Executive officers and all salaried employees are also eligible to receive health and welfare benefits. Pursuant to employment agreements or an offer letter, the Named Executive Officers were also eligible to receive certain payments and benefits upon termination of employment under certain circumstances, as well as acceleration of vesting of certain outstanding equity awards in connection with a change in control. See “—Employment Agreements” for additional information.

In connection with our initial public offering, we established a compensation committee which assumed the responsibility, from our board of directors, for making compensation decisions for our executive officers and directors. We also assumed from Kellwood its obligations under those employment agreements with our executive officers to which Kellwood was a party. See “—Employment Agreements” for additional information. Additionally, in connectionfiled with the pricing of our initial public offering on November 21, 2013, we assumed Kellwood’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan with respect to prior grants (whether vested or unvested) made to our executive officersSecurities and made equity grants under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan to certain of our executive officers and employees and to our non-employee directors. Going forward, we intend to grant additional long-term equity incentives to our executives under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, as described below in “—Employee Stock Plans—Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.”

Our compensation committee reviews compensation elements and amounts for our Named Executive Officers on an annual basis and at the time of a promotion or other change in level of responsibilities, as well as

when competitive circumstances or business needs may require. In addition, as we gain additional experience as a public company, we expect that the specific direction, emphasis and components of our executive compensation program will continue to evolve. Accordingly, the compensation paid to Vince’s Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2013 may not necessarily be indicative of how we may compensate Vince’s Named Executive Officers in future years.

Executive Compensation Design Overview

Our executive compensation programs have historically been designed to provide competitive total compensation opportunities. They were designed to align pay with achievement of our annual and long-term financial and operational goals and recognize individual achievement. In setting pay levels, we reviewed published survey information and other available compensation data that was specific to companies of similar size or positioning in our industry. As currently structured, our executive compensation program is designed to:

provide aggregate compensation that reflects the market compensation for executives with similar responsibilities in similar companies with appropriate adjustments to reflect the experience, performance and other distinguishing characteristics of specific individuals;

be commensurate with our short-term and long-term financial performance;

be aligned with the value for stockholders; and

provide a competitive compensation opportunity to allow us to attract and retain key executive talent.

We believe that an important criterion for the determination of the aggregate value of our compensation program and the allocation of such value among the various elements of our compensation plans is market data on the amounts, allocations and structures utilized by similarly situated companies for positions of comparable responsibility.

In fiscal 2013 prior to consummation of our initial public offering, we retained the services of Aon Hewitt (“Aon”), a compensation consultant, to prepare a comprehensive analysis of our compensation packages for our executive officers (including our Named Executive Officers), to compare the specific elements of compensation and the aggregate value with a group of peer companies selected by Aon and to assist us in establishing the elements of our compensation program following consummation of our initial public offering, including elements of our compensation for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014. We intend to continue to collaborate with Aon, using the results of their benchmarking study, to develop the elements of our go-forward public company compensation program. We anticipate that this program will include additional grants under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and may include offerings pursuant to the Vince ESPP, each of which we adoptedExchange Commission in connection with our initial public offering in November 2013.

Risk Assessment and Compensation Practices

Our management assesses and discusses with the board2017 annual meeting of directors our compensation policies and practices for our employees as they relate to our overall risk management and, based upon this assessment, we believe that any risks arising from such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.stockholders.

Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Base Salaries. In fiscal 2013, our board of directors reviewed and held deliberations concerning the compensation of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers. Going forward, our compensation committee will review the base salaries of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, at least annually and make adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary. The current base salaries of the Named Executive Officers are as follows:

Named Executive Officer

  Base Salary 

Jill Granoff, Chief Executive Officer (1)

  $1,000,000  

Lisa Klinger, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (2)

  $500,000  

Karin Gregersen, President and Chief Creative Officer (3)

  $750,000  

(1)The board of directors approved a base salary increase for Ms. Granoff from $900,000 to $1,000,000 effective as of February 1, 2013.
(2)Ms. Klinger’s base salary was increased from $450,000 to $500,000 in November 2013.
(3)Ms. Gregersen was hired and began performing the duties of President in March 2013 and became our Chief Creative Officer in October 2013.

Sign-On Bonuses. Certain executives received a one-time sign-on bonus when they joined us. For fiscal 2013, Ms. Gregersen received a sign-on bonus of $200,000.

Guaranteed Bonus. Certain executives were eligible to receive a guaranteed minimum bonus based on their annual salary and their targeted bonus opportunity. If an executive’s award in fiscal 2013 under the Performance Management and Incentive Compensation Program, as described below in “— Cash Bonus Plan,” (the “2013 Bonus Plan”), is lower than their guaranteed minimum bonus for such year, they will receive a cash bonus in fiscal 2014 (for services rendered in fiscal 2013) in an amount equal to the difference, so that their total cash bonus award for fiscal 2013 is equal to their guaranteed minimum bonus. The compensation committee made bonus determinations with respect to the 2013 Bonus Plan on March 26, 2014. Payouts under the 2013 Bonus Plan (and any additional cash bonus) will be paid in April 2014. For fiscal 2013, Ms. Gregersen had a guaranteed bonus of $375,000. See “—Summary Compensation Table” and “— Cash Bonus Plan” for additional information.

Cash Bonus PlanThe 2013 Bonus Plan was designed to encourage a high level of performance in fiscal 2013 so that the achievement of targeted performance levels is rewarded with a target incentive payout, and performance above such levels is rewarded with higher-level payouts. Each executive officer is assigned a target annual award opportunity based on the achievement of EBITDA performance that is expressed as a percentage of such executive’s base salary. Our board of directors had historically approved these targeted award opportunities for each Vince executive officer. Going forward (beginning with fiscal 2014), these targeted awards will be approved by our compensation committee. Ms. Gregersen will receive an additional cash bonus payment of $25,438 for fiscal 2013, reflecting the difference between her guaranteed bonus of $375,000 and her pro-rated award of $349,562 under the 2013 Bonus Plan.

Our compensation committee established targets for our Named Executive Officers under the Short-Term Incentive Program (the “2014 Bonus Plan”). The 2014 Bonus Plan modified our performance metrics to include both a revenue and a profit component, instead of using EBITDA thresholds, to better measure our performance and align with the incentive plan design of many of our peer companies. The performance metric for the revenue component is net sales, and this metric will have a weight of 25% for bonus determinations under the 2014 Bonus Plan. The remaining 75% of bonus determinations under the 2014 Bonus Plan will be based on operating income. The payout opportunity for the Named Executive Officers under the 2014 Bonus Plan will be 50% for reaching certain threshold amounts, 100% for reaching certain target amounts and 200% for reaching certain maximum amounts, all set forth under the 2014 Bonus Plan.

Although we are using net sales and operating income as financial measures for fiscal 2014 and intend to do so in future fiscal years, we may use other objective financial performance indicators for the cash bonus plan in

the future, including but not limited to the price of our common stock, stockholder return, return on equity, return on investment, return on capital, sales productivity, same-store sales growth, economic value added, gross margin, cash flow, earnings per share or market share.

Kellwood Equity Incentives. On June 30, 2010, the board of directors of Kellwood, a former subsidiary of Vince Holding Corp., approved the 2010 Stock Option Plan. Prior to the consummation of our initial public offering in November 2013, grant agreements for grants previously made to our executive officers under the 2010 Option Plan were amended to eliminate the restrictions on exercisability for vested options following the closing of our initial public offering and to provide for a minimum holding period to apply to any shares received on account of exercising such options. After giving effect to these amendments, options granted under the 2010 Option Plan (i) continue to vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% per year measured from the grant date and (ii) expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination of employment for cause. On November 21, 2013 (immediately prior to the pricing of our initial public offering), Vince Holding Corp. assumed all of Kellwood’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan with respect to options previously granted thereunder to our executive officers and such options became exercisable upon the consummation of the IPO. After giving effect to this assumption and the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions and the IPO, the options previously granted to our Named Executive Officers under the 2010 Option Plan became options to acquire the following number of shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock at the specified exercise prices: (i) 1,153,291 options at $5.75 per share (Ms. Granoff); (ii) 196,583 options at $5.75 per share (Ms. Klinger); and (iii) 170,372 options at $6.64 per share (Ms. Gregersen).

The fair value of the stock options is determined at the grant date using a probability-weighted expected return method model, which requires us to make several significant assumptions including long-term EBITDA growth rates, future enterprise value, discount rates, and timing and probability of a future liquidity event. This methodology was selected based on the current capital structure and forecasted operational performance.

In addition, after giving effect to the assumption by Vince Holding Corp. of Kellwood’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan (as discussed above), 100% of any outstanding and unvested shares granted under the 2010 Option Plan will vest upon a “Sale of the Company.” Sale of the Company is defined as (i) any consolidation, merger or other transaction in which Vince Holding Corp. is not the surviving entity or which results in the acquisition of all or substantially all of Vince Holding Corp.’s outstanding shares of common stock by a single person or entity or by a group of persons or entities acting in concert; (ii) any sale or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets (excluding, however, for this purpose any real estate “sale-lease back” transaction); or (iii) the date that (A) more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares of voting stock of the surviving or acquiring entity is owned and/or controlled (by agreement or otherwise), directly or indirectly, by a single person or entity or by a group of persons or entities acting in concert other than Sun Capital or its affiliates; and (B) Sun Capital or its affiliates no longer controls our board of directors; provided, however, that the term “sale” shall not include transactions either (x) with affiliates of Vince Holding Corp. or Sun Capital (as determined by our board of directors in its good faith sole discretion) or (y) pursuant to which more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares of voting stock of the surviving or acquiring entity is owned and/or controlled (by agreement or otherwise), directly or indirectly, by Sun Capital or its affiliates. The restructuring transactions consummated immediately prior to our initial public offering did not constitute a “Sale of the Company” and did not result in the vesting of options previously granted under the 2010 Option Plan to our named executive officers.

In determining the number of Kellwood shares underlying each option grant under the 2010 Option Plan, the Kellwood board of directors took into account each executive officer’s existing unvested equity grants and made awards that they determined would be sufficient to motivate and retain each executive officer past the expected date of our initial public offering. No additional equity grants will be made under the 2010 Option Plan.

On November 21, 2013, in connection with the pricing of our initial public offering, we granted Ms. Klinger options to acquire 99,812 shares of our common stock, on an as converted basis, under the Vince 2013 Incentive

Plan. The options have an exercise price equal to $20.00. 71,294 of such options will vest over four years at the rate of 25% each year on each anniversary of the grant date, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as Ms. Klinger remains continuously employed with us through each such vesting date. The remaining 28,518 shares will vest over four years, but at the rate of 33 1/3% on each anniversary of the grant date beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date, so long as Ms. Klinger remains continuously employed with us through each such vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Ms. Klinger is involuntarily terminated by us within the twelve (12) months period following a change in control (as defined in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan) then any unvested options that are part of this grant and remaining outstanding will become fully vested. Any shares of our common stock that Ms. Klinger receives upon exercise of these options will be subject to certain minimum holding requirements. We did not make any grants to Ms. Granoff or Ms. Gregersen under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan in fiscal 2013.

The stock option grants made to these Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2013 under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan were as follows:

Named Executive Officer

  Date of Grant  Number of Shares(1)   Exercise Price(2)(3) 

Jill Granoff

  N/A   N/A     N/A  

Lisa Klinger

  November 21, 2013   99,812    $20.00  

Karin Gregersen

  N/A   N/A     N/A  

(1)Represents grants made under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan in connection with the pricing of our initial public offering on November 21, 2013. All options are options to acquire shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock. Does not include the options to acquire shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock previously issued to our Named Executive Officers under the 2010 Option Plan, the obligations with respect to which we assumed on November 21, 2013 in anticipation of the consummation of our initial public offering.
(2)Represents the public offering price in our initial public offering, or $20.00 per share.
(3)The grant date fair value of these option grants is reflected in the “—Summary Compensation Table” under the “Option Awards” column.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation for services rendered in all capacities that was earned by each individual who served as our principal executive officer at any time during fiscal 2013 and our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers during the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014.

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary ($)  Bonus ($)  Option
Awards
($)(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation
($)(2)
  All Other
Compen-
sation
($)(3)
  Total ($) 

Jill Granoff

  2013   $998,462   $—     $—     $7,089,172(4)  $12,199   $8,099,833  

Chief Executive Officer

       
  2012   $661,154(5)  $27,363(6)  $2,128,920   $472,637   $11,245   $3,301,319  

Lisa Klinger

  2013   $460,577(7)  $—     $879,923   $
 
 
245,064
  
(8) 
 $8,339   $1,593,903  

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

       
  2012   $60,577(9)  $336,861(10)  $309,924   $13,139   $—     $720,051  

Karin Gregersen

       

President and Chief Creative Officer

  2013   $533,654(11)  $225,438(12)  $376,999   $349,562   $12,172   $1,497,825  

(1)The fair value of stock options granted under the 2010 Option Plan in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 was determined at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model, which requires us to make several significant assumptions including risk-free interest rate, volatility, expected term, and discount factors for stockholders in a privately-held company. At the grant date, the options granted to Ms. Granoff in fiscal 2012 had a weighted average fair value of $1.85 per share, the options granted to Ms. Klinger in fiscal 2012 had a weighted average fair value of $1.58 per share and the options granted to Ms. Gregersen in fiscal 2013 had a weighted average fair value of $2.21 per share, each as adjusted to give effect to Vince Holding Corp.’s assumption of Kellwood Company, LLC’s outstanding obligations under the 2010 Option Plan and the stock split effected in connection with consummation of our initial public offering. As discussed above in “—Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Kellwood Equity Incentives,” the options previously issued to Ms. Granoff, Ms. Klinger and Ms. Gregersen under the 2010 Option Plan became options to acquire 1,153,291 shares, 196,583 shares and 170,372 shares, respectively, of Vince Holding Corp. common stock, with an exercise price of $5.75 per share (with respect to Ms. Granoff and Ms. Klinger) and $6.64 per share (with respect to Ms. Gregersen). Additionally in fiscal 2013, Vince Holding Corp. issued options to acquire 99,812 shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock to Ms. Klinger under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. Such options have an exercise price equal to $20.00, our initial public offering price. The fair value of such options, as reflected above, was also determined using a Black-Scholes model, which was $8.82 per share.
(2)Amounts reflect the annual incentive cash bonus earned in the fiscal year shown but paid in the following fiscal year.
(3)Amounts reflect the value of their clothing allowance, excess life insurance and 401(k) contributions made by the company.
(4)Amount consists of: (i) the $6.0 million debt recovery bonus paid in connection with the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions and the closing of our initial public offering—see “—Employment Agreements” and “Debt Recovery Bonus” under “Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” of this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information; (ii) $234,688 paid pursuant to the 2013 Bonus Plan for services rendered in connection with the non-Vince businesses during fiscal 2013 prior to the separation of such businesses on November 27, 2013 (such amount to be paid by Kellwood Company); and (iii) $854,485 paid pursuant to the 2013 Bonus Plan for services rendered in connection with the Vince business throughout fiscal 2013 (such amount to be paid by us).
(5)Salary reflects base compensation from the hire date of May 4, 2012 through February 2, 2013.
(6)Amount reflects cash bonus payment after giving effect to the $472,637 which was paid upon the achievement of targeted objectives under the 2012 Bonus Plan. The aggregate of such amounts (or $500,000) represents the amount of Ms. Granoff’s guaranteed bonus for fiscal 2012.
(7)Amount reflects an increase to Ms. Klinger’s annual salary (from $450,000 to $500,000) effective November 2013.
(8)Amount consists of: (i) $52,805 paid pursuant to the 2013 Bonus Plan for services rendered in connection with the non-Vince businesses during fiscal 2013 prior to the separation of such businesses on November 27, 2013 (such amount to be paid by Kellwood Company); and (ii) $192,259 paid pursuant to the 2013 Bonus Plan for services rendered in connection with the Vince business throughout fiscal 2013 (such amount to be paid by us).
(9)Salary reflects base compensation from the hire date of December 10, 2012 through February 2, 2013.
(10)Amount reflects cash bonus payment after giving effect to the $13,139 which was paid upon the achievement of targeted objectives under the 2012 Bonus Plan. The aggregate of such amounts (or $350,000) represents the amount of Ms. Klinger’s guaranteed bonus for fiscal 2012.
(11)Salary reflects base compensation from the hire date of May 13, 2013 through February 1, 2014.
(12)Amount reflects a cash bonus payment of $25,438 to be paid after giving effect to the $349,562 which will be paid in April 2014 for the achievement of targeted objectives under the 2013 Bonus Plan. The aggregate of such amounts (or $375,000) represents the amount of Ms. Gregersen’s guaranteed bonus for fiscal 2013. Amount also includes a $200,000 signing bonus.

Employment Agreements

Jill Granoff, Chief Executive Officer. Kellwood entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Granoff on May 4, 2012. This agreement was amended on September 24, 2013 to clarify that Ms. Granoff’s debt recovery bonus (as discussed below) was to be paid, at the closing of our initial public offering, prior to the payment of a 1% restructuring fee to Sun Capital Management or to the repurchase, by Kellwood, of any 7.625% Notes in the related tender offer. Vince Holding Corp. assumed Kellwood’s obligations thereunder on November 27, 2013, in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Ms. Granoff received an annual base salary of $1,000,000 in fiscal 2013. In addition to base salary, Ms. Granoff was eligible to participate in the 2013 Bonus Plan which provided her with the opportunity to earn a bonus targeted at 100% of her base salary in fiscal 2013. Ms. Granoff was not entitled to receive any guaranteed bonus for fiscal 2013.

In connection with the consummation of our initial public offering and the repayment of certain Kellwood indebtedness, Ms. Granoff earned a debt recovery bonus of $6.0 million under the terms of her amended employment agreement. The amount of the bonus was equal to 4.4% of the related debt recovery, subject to the aggregate maximum bonus cap of $6.0 million; provided, that she remain continuously employed with us through the related payment date. The debt recovery bonus paid to Ms. Granoff includes $440,000 associated with the prior repayment of certain Kellwood indebtedness. Ms. Granoff agreed to delay the payment of such amount until consummation of our initial public offering and the payment of the related debt recovery bonus to her.

In the event Ms. Granoff’s employment is terminated without cause or Ms. Granoff terminates her employment for good reason, she would be eligible to receive (i) any unpaid base salary through her termination date, together with a pro-rated portion of the annual bonus for the year in which her termination occurs, (ii) reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses incurred through her termination date, (iii) any accrued and unused vacation time, (iv) all other payments, benefits or fringe benefits to which she is entitled under the terms of any applicable compensation arrangement or benefit, equity or fringe benefit plan or program or grant, (v) her base salary during a period ending on the 18-month anniversary of her termination date, less any salary she receives from other full-time employment after the 12-month anniversary of her termination, (vi) continued participation in our group health plan for 18 months or until she obtains other employment following the first anniversary of her termination and such employment offers comparable group health benefits for which she is eligible, (vii) the pro rata portion of shares subject to Ms. Granoff’s option grants which would have otherwise vested on the next scheduled vesting date had her employment continued until such time and (viii) any prior period bonus earned and not yet paid.

Ms. Granoff’s employment agreement also provides that during the term of her employment and for a period of 12 months thereafter (the “restricted period”), she will not directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, control, be employed by (whether as an employee, consultant, independent contractor or otherwise, and whether or not for compensation) or render services to certain of our competitors or any of their successors or affiliates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Ms. Granoff may be a passive owner of not more than 1% of the equity securities of a publicly traded corporation engaged in a business that is a competitor, so long as she has no active participation in the business of such company. In addition, during the restricted period, Ms. Granoff will not, directly or indirectly, individually or on behalf of another person, firm or corporation, solicit, aid or induce any individual or entity that is, or was during the 12-month period immediately prior to termination of Ms. Granoff’s employment for any reason, our customer to terminate or materially reduce its purchase of our goods or services or assist or aid any other persons or entity in doing so. Further, during the restricted period, Ms. Granoff will not, directly or indirectly, individually or on behalf of another person, firm or corporation, (i) solicit or induce any of our employees, representatives or agents to leave such employment or retention or to accept employment with or render services to or with any other person, firm corporation or other entity unaffiliated with us or hire or retain such employee, representative or agent or take any action to materially assist or aid another person, firm or corporation in identify, hiring or soliciting such employee, representative or agent, or (ii) interfere, or aid or

induce any other person or entity in interfering with the relationship between us and any of our vendors, joint venture partners or licensors. Employees, representatives and agents are deemed covered while they are employed by the Company and for a period of six months after, unless we terminated their employment.

Lisa Klinger, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Effective December 10, 2012, Ms. Klinger entered into an employment agreement with Kellwood. Vince Holding Corp. assumed Kellwood’s obligations thereunder on November 27, 2013, in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, Ms. Klinger receives an annual base salary of $500,000, which was increased in November 2013 from $450,000. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Klinger was guaranteed an annual cash bonus of $350,000 for fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2013, in addition to base salary, Ms. Klinger was eligible to participate in the 2013 Bonus Plan that provided her with the opportunity to earn a bonus targeted at 50% of her base salary.

In the event Ms. Klinger’s employment is terminated without cause, she would be eligible to receive (i) her base salary during a period ending on the earlier of the 12 month anniversary of her termination date and the date on which she secures replacement employment (the “salary continuation period”) and (ii) continued medical and dental coverage in accordance with the Company’s medical plans that are then in place until the end of the salary continuation period, or at the Company’s option, coverage under another medical and/or dental plan.

Karin Gregersen, President and Chief Creative Officer. Effective May 13, 2013, Ms. Gregersen entered into an employment agreement with Vince, LLC, at which time she received a $200,000 signing bonus. Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, Ms. Gregersen receives an annual base salary of $750,000. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Gregersen was eligible to participate in the 2013 Bonus Plan that provided her with the opportunity to earn a bonus targeted at 50% of her base salary, with a guaranteed an annual cash bonus of $375,000 for fiscal 2013.

In the event Ms. Gregersen’s employment is terminated without cause or Ms. Gregersen terminates her employment for good reason, she would be eligible to receive (i) any unpaid base salary through her termination date, (ii) any additional amounts and/or benefits payable to or in respect Ms. Gregersen under and in accordance with the provisions of any employee plan, program or arrangement under which Ms. Gregersen is covered immediately prior to termination, (iii)(a) any unpaid annual bonus for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the termination date occurs and (b) a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination date occurs, in both cases payable at the same time as such payments would have been made if Ms. Gregersen had remained employed through the date of payment, (iv) her base salary, at the rate being paid at the termination date, for the earlier of 12 months or until Ms. Gregersen secures other employment which pays her a base salary equal to or greater than her base salary at the termination date (the “severance period”); provided, however, that if Ms. Gregersen obtains other employment which pays her a base salary less than her base salary at the termination date, then the severance payments will immediately become subject to offset by the amount of base salary and guaranteed incentive compensation from such other employment, (v) continued medical and dental coverage in accordance with the company’s medical plans that are then in place until the end of the severance period, and (vi) subject to the terms and conditions of any grant agreements, Ms. Gregersen may retain any vested options.

Ms. Gregersen’s employment agreement also provides that during the term of her employment and for a period of 12 months thereafter (the “restricted period”), she will not directly or indirectly (i) design, develop, promote, sell, license, distribute or market anywhere in the world any contemporary apparel, accessories or related products (the “competitive products”) or (ii) own, manage, operate, be employed by, or participate in or have any interest in any other business engaged in the design, production, distribution or sale of competitive products. In addition, during the restricted period, Ms. Gregersen will not directly or indirectly (i) solicit or induce any employee, consultant, representative or agent of Vince or any of its affiliates to leave such employment to accept employment with or render services for any other person, firm or other entity unaffiliated with Vince, or take any action to materially assist or aid any other period in identifying, hiring or soliciting any

such employee or (ii) interfere, or aid or induce any other person in interfering with the relationship between Vince or any of its affiliates and any of its respective customers, suppliers, vendors, distribution partners, licensors, licensees or any other business relation of Vince or its affiliates.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2013 Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards of Vince Holding Corp. held by our Named Executive Officers at the end of fiscal 2013:

  Options Awards

Name

 Vesting
Commencement
Date
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration Date

Jill Granoff

 May 4, 2012(1)  230,658    922,633(2)  $5.75(2)   May 4, 2022

Lisa Klinger

 December 10, 2012(1)  39,317    157,266(2)  $5.75(2)   December 10, 2022
 November 21, 2013(3)      99,812(3)  $20.00(3)   November 21, 2023

Karin Gregersen

 June 10, 2013(1)      170,372(2)  $6.64(2)   May 13, 2023

(1)Represents stock options previously granted to Ms. Granoff, Ms. Klinger and Ms. Gregersen under the 2010 Option Plan. These options will vest 20% each year on the anniversary of the grant date beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date so long as they remain continuously employed with the Company. After giving effect to the amendments to the related grant agreements which were entered into prior to the consummation of our initial public offering, vested options shall be immediately exercisable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unvested options will automatically vest upon the consummation of certain sale and change of control transactions (which did not include our initial public offering).
(2)Each stock option was granted pursuant to the 2010 Option Plan. As discussed above in “—Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Kellwood Equity Incentives,” these options previously issued to Ms. Granoff, Ms. Klinger and Ms. Gregersen became options to acquire 1,153,291, 196,583 and 170,372 shares, respectively, of Vince Holding Corp. common stock, with an adjusted exercise price equal to $5.75 per share (for Ms. Granoff and Ms. Klinger) or $6.64 per share (for Ms. Gregersen) as identified above.
(3)Represents stock options granted to Ms. Klinger under the 2013 Vince Incentive Plan in connection with the pricing of our initial public offering. All such options have an exercise price of $20.00 per share, the public offering price in our initial public offering. 71,294 of such options will vest over four years at the rate of 25% each year on each anniversary of the grant date, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, so long as Ms. Klinger remains continuously employed with the company through each such vesting date. The remaining 28,518 of such options will vest over four years, but at the rate of 33 1/3% on each anniversary of the grant date beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date, so long as Ms. Klinger remains continuously employed with the Company through each such vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Ms. Klinger is involuntarily terminated within the twelve (12) months period following a change in control, any unvested options that are part of this grant and remaining outstanding will become fully vested.

Director Compensation

During fiscal 2013, we adopted a compensation policy with respect to our directors in anticipation of our initial public offering. All members of our board of directors that are not employed by us or by Sun Capital or its affiliates are entitled to receive compensation for their services to the board of directors and related committees pursuant to the policy described below.

The annual cash fees paid to our non-employee directors and directors not employed by Sun Capital or its affiliates is as follows:

Description

Amount

Annual Retainer(1)

$50,000

Retainer for Chair of Committee(1)

$15,000 for chairing our audit committee; $10,000 for chairing our compensation committee; and $5,000 for chairing our nominating and corporate governance committee

(1)Such amounts were paid to each applicable director in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. For all such directors elected or appointed after the consummation of our initial public offering, the applicable amount(s) shall be paid upon his or her election or appointment to our board of directors or to the applicable board committee chair position, with such amount calculated on a pro rata basis for the first year of service.

All directors are also entitled to be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend meetings of our board of directors and related committees.

In addition, our non-employee directors and directors not employed by Sun Capital or its affiliates are entitled to receive the following equity awards:

Annual Restricted Stock Grant. On an annual basis, each of our non-employee directors then in office (other than directors employed by Sun Capital or its affiliates) will receive a grant of $75,000 worth of restricted common stock. These shares of restricted common stock will vest over a three-year period from the grant date. Each non-employee director elected or appointed to our board in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering (i.e. Messrs. Bowman and Griffith) received his or her annual grant of $75,000 worth of restricted stock in connection with the closing of such offering. Each non-employee director elected or appointed to our board of directors in the future will receive a pro rata amount of the annual grant for the first year in which he or she serves on our board based on the date such non-employee director is elected or appointed.

During fiscal 2013, Messrs. Bowman and Griffith were our only non-employee directors who were not employed by Sun Capital or its affiliates. The compensation earned during fiscal 2013 by Messrs. Bowman and Griffith for serving as a member of our board of directors is set forth in the following table.

Name

  Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash
  Stock
Awards
  All Other
Compensation
   Total 

Robert A. Bowman

  $65,000(1)  $75,000(2)  $    $140,000  

Jerome Griffith

  $50,000   $75,000(2)  $    $125,000  

(1)Such amounts include an annual retainer of $50,000 paid to each of Messrs. Bowman and Griffith for their service on our board of directors generally. Mr. Bowman received an additional $15,000 for serving as the chair of our audit committee.
(2)Represents the grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the 3,750 restricted stock units granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan to each of Messrs. Bowman and Griffith on November 21, 2013. The restricted stock units shall vest over three (3) years, subject to the grantee’s continued service as a director as of each vesting date, and are subject to the terms and conditions of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and the related grant agreement.

Director and Officer Indemnification and Limitation of Liability

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders or (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law.

In addition, we entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors on November 27, 2013 in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors or officers to which indemnification is being sought, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director or officer.

Employee Stock Plans

2010 Option Plan

The 2010 Option Plan was adopted by the board of directors of Kellwood on June 30, 2010. In connection with the consummation of our initial public offering, we amended the grant agreements associated with grants previously made to Vince employees under the 2010 Option Plan. These amendments eliminated the restrictions on the exercisability of vested options. Additionally, Vince Holding Corp. assumed Kellwood’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan. After giving effect to such assumption, the stock options previously issued to Vince employees became options to acquire shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock (with the number of shares subject to such options and the related exercise price adjusted to give effect to the stock split which occurred as part of the Restructuring Transactions which occurred immediately prior to the consummation of our initial public offering).

We will not grant any further awards under the 2010 Option Plan to any of our officers or directors. Future awards to Vince’s executive officers and directors shall be granted by our board of directors or compensation committee under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, as described below.

Vince 2013 Incentive Plan

In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, which provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards. Directors, officers and our employees, as well as others performing consulting or advisory services for us, are eligible for grants under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. The purpose of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan is to provide incentives that will attract, retain and motivate high performing officers, directors, employees and consultants by providing them with appropriate incentives and rewards either through a proprietary interest in our long-term success or compensation based on their performance in fulfilling their personal responsibilities. Set forth below is a summary of the material terms of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

Administration. The Vince 2013 Incentive Plan is administered by our compensation committee. Among the compensation committee’s powers is to determine the form, amount and other terms and conditions of awards; clarify, construe or resolve any ambiguity in any provision of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan or any award agreement; amend the terms of outstanding awards; and adopt such rules, forms, instruments and guidelines for administering the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan as it deems necessary or proper. The compensation committee has authority to administer and interpret the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, to grant discretionary awards under the

Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, to determine the persons to whom awards will be granted, to determine the types of awards to be granted, to determine the terms and conditions of each award, to determine the number of shares of common stock to be covered by each award, to make all other determinations in connection with the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and the awards thereunder as the compensation committee deems necessary or desirable and to delegate authority under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan to our executive officers.

Available Shares. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued or used for reference purposes under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan or with respect to which awards may be granted may not exceed 3,400,000 shares. The number of shares available for issuance under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan is subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, stock split, merger or similar change in the corporate structure or the outstanding shares of common stock. In the event of any of these occurrences, we may make any adjustments we consider appropriate to, among other things, the number and kind of shares, options or other property available for issuance under the plan or covered by grants previously made under the plan. The shares available for issuance under the plan may be, in whole or in part, either authorized and unissued shares of our common stock or shares of common stock held in or acquired for our treasury. In general, if awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan are for any reason cancelled, or expire or terminate unexercised, the shares covered by such awards may again be available for the grant of awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

The maximum number of shares of our common stock with respect to which any stock option, stock appreciation right, shares of restricted stock or other stock-based awards that are subject to the attainment of specified performance goals and intended to satisfy Section 162(m) of the Code and may be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any eligible individual is 1,000,000 shares (per type of award); provided, that the total number of shares of our common stock with respect to all awards that may be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan during any fiscal year is 1,000,000 shares. There are no annual limits on the number of shares of our common stock with respect to an award of restricted stock that is not subject to the attainment of specified performance goals to eligible individuals. The maximum number of shares of our common stock subject to any performance award which may be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any eligible individual is 1,000,000 shares. The total number of shares of our common stock subject to any award which may be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any non-employee director is 100,000 shares. The maximum value of any cash payment made pursuant to an award which may be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any non-employee director is $500,000.

Eligibility for Participation. Members of our board of directors, as well as employees of, and consultants to, us or any of our subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

Award Agreement. Awards granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan are evidenced by award agreements, which need not be identical, that provide additional terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations covering the grant of the award, including, without limitation, additional terms providing for the acceleration of exercisability or vesting of awards in the event of a change of control or conditions regarding the participant’s employment, as determined by the compensation committee.

Stock Options. The compensation committee may grant additional nonqualified stock options to eligible individuals and incentive stock options only to eligible employees. The compensation committee will determine the number of shares of our common stock subject to each option, the term of each option, which may not exceed ten years, or five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a ten percent stockholder, the exercise price, the vesting schedule, if any, and the other material terms of each option. No incentive stock option or nonqualified stock option may have an exercise price less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock at the time of grant or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a ten percent stockholder, 110% of such share’s fair market value. Options will be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the compensation committee at grant and the exercisability of such options may be accelerated by the compensation committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The compensation committee may grant stock appreciation rights, which we refer to as SARs, either with a stock option, which may be exercised only at such times and to the extent the related option is exercisable, which we refer to as a Tandem SAR, or independent of a stock option, which we refer to as a Non-Tandem SAR. A SAR is a right to receive a payment in shares of our common stock or cash, as determined by the compensation committee, equal in value to the excess of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price per share established in connection with the grant of the SAR. The term of each SAR may not exceed ten years. The exercise price per share covered by an SAR will be the exercise price per share of the related option in the case of a Tandem SAR and will be the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant in the case of a Non-Tandem SAR. The compensation committee may also grant limited SARs, either as Tandem SARs or Non-Tandem SARs, which may become exercisable only upon the occurrence of a change in control, as defined in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, or such other event as the compensation committee may designate at the time of grant or thereafter.

Restricted Stock. The compensation committee may award additional shares of restricted stock. Except as otherwise provided by the compensation committee upon the award of restricted stock, the recipient generally has the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares, including the right to receive dividends, the right to vote the shares of restricted stock and, conditioned upon full vesting of shares of restricted stock, the right to tender such shares, subject to the conditions and restrictions generally applicable to restricted stock or specifically set forth in the recipient’s restricted stock agreement. The compensation committee may determine at the time of award that the payment of dividends, if any, will be deferred until the expiration of the applicable restriction period.

Recipients of restricted stock are required to enter into a restricted stock agreement with us that states the restrictions to which the shares are subject, which may include satisfaction of pre-established performance goals, and the criteria or date or dates on which such restrictions will lapse.

If the grant of restricted stock or the lapse of the relevant restrictions is based on the attainment of performance goals, the compensation committee will establish for each recipient the applicable performance goals, formulae or standards and the applicable vesting percentages with reference to the attainment of such goals or satisfaction of such formulae or standards while the outcome of the performance goals are substantially uncertain. Such performance goals may incorporate provisions for disregarding, or adjusting for, changes in accounting methods, corporate transactions, including, without limitation, dispositions and acquisitions, and other similar events or circumstances. Section 162(m) of the Code requires that performance awards be based upon objective performance measures in order to qualify as “performance based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). The performance goals for restricted stock intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” will be based on one or more of the objective criteria set forth on an exhibit to the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and are further discussed in general below.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The compensation committee may, subject to limitations under applicable law, make a grant of such other stock-based awards, including, without limitation, performance units, dividend equivalent units, stock equivalent units, restricted stock and deferred stock units under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan that are payable in cash or denominated or payable in or valued by shares of our common stock or factors that influence the value of such shares. The compensation committee may determine the terms and conditions of any such other awards, which may include the achievement of certain minimum performance goals for purposes of compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code and/or a minimum vesting period. The performance goals for performance-based other stock-based awards intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” will be based on one or more of the objective criteria set forth on an exhibit to the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and discussed in general below.

Other Cash-Based Awards. The compensation committee may grant awards payable in cash. Cash-based awards will be in such form, and dependent on such conditions, as the compensation committee will determine, including, without limitation, being subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions or awarded purely as a bonus and not subject to restrictions or conditions. If a cash-based award is subject to vesting conditions, the compensation committee may accelerate the vesting of such award in its discretion.

Performance Awards. The compensation committee may grant a performance award to a participant payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals. If the performance award is payable in cash, it may be paid upon the attainment of the relevant performance goals either in cash or in shares of restricted stock, based on the then current fair market value of such shares, as determined by the compensation committee. Based on service, performance and/or other factors or criteria, the compensation committee may, at or after grant, accelerate the vesting of all or any part of any performance award.

Performance Goals. The compensation committee may grant awards of restricted stock, performance awards, and other stock-based awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. These awards may be granted, vest and be paid based on attainment of specified performance goals established by the committee. These performance goals may be based on the attainment of a certain target level of, or a specified increase or decrease in, one or more of the following measures selected by the compensation committee: (1) earnings per share; (2) operating income; (3) gross income; (4) net income, before or after taxes; (5) cash flow; (6) gross profit; (7) gross profit return on investment; (8) gross margin return on investment; (9) gross margin; (10) operating margin; (11) working capital; (12) earnings before interest and taxes; (13) earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization; (14) return on equity; (15) return on assets; (16) return on capital; (17) return on invested capital; (18) net revenues; (19) gross revenues; (20) revenue growth; (21) annual recurring revenues; (22) recurring revenues; (23) license revenues; (24) sales or market share; (25) total stockholder return; (26) economic value added; (27) specified objectives with regard to limiting the level of increase in all or a portion of our bank debt or other long-term or short-term public or private debt or other similar financial obligations, which may be calculated net of cash balances and other offsets and adjustments as may be established by the compensation committee; (28) the fair market value of a share of our common stock; (29) the growth in the value of an investment in our common stock assuming the reinvestment of dividends; or (30) reduction in operating expenses.

To the extent permitted by law, the compensation committee may also exclude the impact of an event or occurrence which the compensation committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as (1) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring charges; (2) an event either not directly related to our operations or not within the reasonable control of management; or (3) a change in accounting standards required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Performance goals may also be based on an individual participant’s performance goals, as determined by the compensation committee.

In addition, all performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of our performance, or the performance of a subsidiary, division or other operational unit, under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other corporations. The compensation committee may designate additional business criteria on which the performance goals may be based or adjust, modify or amend those criteria.

Change in Control. In connection with a change in control, as defined in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, the compensation committee may accelerate vesting of outstanding awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. In addition, such awards may be, in the discretion of the committee, (1) assumed and continued or substituted in accordance with applicable law; (2) purchased by us for an amount equal to the excess of the price of a share of our common stock paid in a change in control over the exercise price of the awards; or (3) cancelled for no consideration if the price of a share of our common stock paid in a change in control is less than the exercise price of the award. The compensation committee may also provide for accelerated vesting or lapse of restrictions of an award at any time.

Stockholder Rights. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, and with respect to an award of restricted stock, a participant has no rights as a stockholder with respect to shares of our common stock covered by any award until the participant becomes the record holder of such shares.

Amendment and Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, our board of directors may at any time amend any or all of the provisions of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, or suspend or terminate it entirely, retroactively or otherwise, subject to stockholder approval in certain instances; provided, however, that, unless otherwise required by law or specifically provided in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, the rights of a participant with respect to awards granted prior to such amendment, suspension or termination may not be adversely affected without the consent of such participant.

Transferability. Awards granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan generally are nontransferable, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except that the committee may provide for the transferability of nonqualified stock options at the time of grant or thereafter to certain family members.

Recoupment of Awards. The Vince 2013 Incentive Plan provides that awards granted thereunder are subject to any recoupment policy that we may have in place or any obligation that we may have regarding the clawback of “incentive-based compensation” under the Exchange Act or under any applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Effective Date; Term. The Vince 2013 Incentive Plan became effective when it was adopted by the board of directors and approved by our stockholders prior to the consummation of our initial public offering and the related Restructuring Transactions. The Vince 2013 Incentive Plan will expire on November 21, 2023, ten years following its approval by our board of directors. Any award outstanding under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan at the time of expiration will remain in effect until such award is exercised or has expired in accordance with its terms.

Severance Benefits

Upon certain types of terminations of employment, severance benefits may be payable to our Named Executive Officers. Severance benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers are addressed in their employment agreements. See “—Employment Agreements.”

Vince Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On November 21, 2013, our board of directors adopted the Vince ESPP, which was approved by our stockholders on the same date. Our compensation committee administers the Vince ESPP. Notwithstanding that the Vince ESPP became effective as of the consummation of our initial public offering, the first offering period thereunder will not commence until specifically authorized by our compensation committee. The Vince ESPP is designed to encourage employees to become stockholders and to increase their ownership of our common stock. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may be issued pursuant to the Vince ESPP may not exceed 1,000,000 shares. We anticipate that shares of our common stock issued under the Vince ESPP would be issued at a discount to market no greater than 5% and with an offering period equal to six months; provided, that the maximum number of shares that may be purchased in any offering period may not exceed 500,000 in total or 500,000 per person. The Vince ESPP is also be intended to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code and to assure the participants of the tax advantages provided thereby.

Section 401(k) Plan

We provide the defined contribution Kellwood Retirement Savings Plan, a 401(k) Plan, as well as various group health and welfare programs that are generally available to all Vince employees, including the Named Executive Officers.

Under the plan, eligible employees electing to participate may contribute up to 100% of their pretax income, subject to IRS rules limiting an individual’s total contributions and the application of IRS tests designed to ensure that the plan does not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees.

Effective February 1, 2013, we reinstated the 401(k) for all employees. Under the reinstated plan, we match 50% up to the first 3% of the employee’s deferral. We made contributions of $3,940, $3,882 and $3,175 to the 401(k) accounts of Ms. Granoff, Ms. Klinger and Ms. Gregersen, respectively, in fiscal 2013.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS.

The following table contains information aboutrequired by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 28, 2014:

each person, or group of persons, who beneficially owns more than 5% of our capital stock;

each of our named executive officers;

each of our directors; and

all directors and executive officers as a group.

For further information regarding material transactions between us and certain of our stockholders, see “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence” of this annual report on Form 10-K

Beneficial ownership and percentage ownership are determined in accordanceCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the rulesSecurities and regulationsExchange Commission in connection with our 2017 annual meeting of the SEC and include voting or investment power with respect to shares of stock. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to restrictions, options or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 28, 2014 are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the following table or pursuant to applicable community property laws, each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholder’s name.stockholders.

Our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 36,723,727 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 28, 2014.

Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the address of each of the individuals named below is: c/o Vince Holding Corp., 1441 Broadway, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10018.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   Percentage of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 
  Number   Percentage 

5% Stockholder:

    

Sun Capital(1)

   24,967,735     68.0

Named Executive Officers & Directors:

    

Jill Granoff(2)

   461,316     * 

Lisa Klinger(2)

   39,317     * 

Karin Gregersen (2)

   34,074     * 

Christopher T. Metz(3)

   —       —    

Mark E. Brody(3)

   —       —    

Jason H. Neimark(3)

   —       —    

Jerome Griffith

   —       —    

Robert A. Bowman

   —       —    

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (14 Persons):

   581,885     1.6

*Less than 1%
(1)

Includes 18,725,787 shares held of record by Sun Cardinal and 6,241,948 shares held of record by SCSF Cardinal. Sun Cardinal is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sun Capital Partners V, L.P. SCSF Cardinal is

jointly owned by Sun Capital Securities Offshore Fund, Ltd. (“SCSF Offshore”) and Sun Capital Securities Fund, L.P. (“SCSF LP”). Indirectly through their respective revocable trusts, Messrs. Marc J. Leder and Rodger Krouse each control 50% of the shares in Sun Capital Partners V, Ltd. (“Sun Partners V Ltd”), which in turn is the general partner of Sun Capital Advisors V, L.P. (“Sun Advisors V”), which in turn is the general partner of Sun Capital Partners V, L.P. (“Sun Partners V LP”). As a result, Messrs. Leder and Krouse (and/or their respective revocable trusts), Sun Partners V Ltd, Sun Advisors V and Sun Partners V LP may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the securities owned directly by Sun Cardinal. Each of Messrs. Leder and Krouse also control, indirectly through their respective revocable trusts, 50% of the membership interests in Sun Capital Securities, LLC (“SCSF LLC”), which in turn is the general partner of Sun Capital Securities Advisors, LP (“SCSF Advisors”), which in turn is the general partner of SCSF LP. As a result, Messrs. Leder and Krouse (and their respective revocable trusts), SCSF LLC, SCSF Advisors, SCSF LP and SCSF Offshore may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the securities directly owned by SCSF Cardinal. Each of Messrs. Leder and Krouse (and their respective revocable trusts), Sun Partners V Ltd, Sun Advisors V, Sun Partners V LP, SCSF LLC, SCSF Advisors, SCSF LP and SCSF Offshore expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which they do not have a pecuniary interest.

The business address for Messrs. Leder and Krouse, Sun Partners V Ltd, Sun Advisors V, Sun Partners V LP, SCSF LLC, SCSF Advisors, SCSF LP and SCSF Offshore is c/o Sun Capital Partners, Inc., 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 600, Boca Raton, FL 33486.

(2)Represents options to acquire shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 28, 2014. These options were previously granted under the 2010 Option Plan (after giving effect to Vince Holding Corp.’s assumption of Kellwood’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering).
(3)The address for each of Messrs. Metz, Neimark and Brody is c/o Sun Capital Partners, Inc., 5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 600, Boca Raton, FL 33486.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The common stock of VHC began trading on NYSE on November 22, 2013. Our board of directors and the Pre-IPO Stockholders, as our sole stockholders, adopted the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan and our Vince 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Vince ESPP”) on November 21, 2013 in anticipation of the consummation of our initial public offering. At the same time, they approved the assumption by Vince Holding Corp. of Kellwood Company’s remaining obligations under the Kellwood 2010 Option Plan (as amended, the “2010 Option Plan”), including with respect to issued and outstanding options thereunder (after giving effect to the IPO and the Restructuring Transactions). Our board of directors also approved on November 21, 2013 the issuance of new equity grants under the 2013 Incentive Plan to certain of our executive officers, employees and non-employee directors.

Plan Category

  Number of securities to be
issued upon the exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
   (a)  (b)  (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   2,297,022(1)  $8.26(2)   4,036,043(3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   2,297,022   $8.26    4,036,043  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Consists of (i) 356,457 issued and outstanding options under the 2013 Incentive Plan; (ii) 1,933,065 issued and outstanding options under the 2010 Option Plan; and (iii) 7,500 issued and outstanding restricted stock units under the 2013 Incentive Plan.
(2)Applicable only to outstanding stock options as the outstanding restricted stock units do not have an exercise price.
(3)Includes 3,036,043 shares issuable under the 2013 Incentive Plan and 1,000,000 shares issuable under the Vince ESPP.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Shared Services Agreement

On November 27, 2013, Vince, LLC entered intoThe information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood pursuant to which Kellwood provides support services in various operational areas including, among other things, e-commerce operations, distribution, logistics, information technology, accounts payable, credit and collections and payroll and benefits.

The Shared Services Agreement may be modified or supplemented to include new services under terms and conditionsCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be mutually agreed upon in good faith by the parties. The fees for all services received by Vince, LLC from Kellwood, including any new services mutually agreed upon by the parties, will be at cost. Such costs shall be the full amount of any and all actual and direct out-of-pocket expenses (including base salary and wages but without providing for any margin of profit or allocation of depreciation or amortization expense) incurred by the service provider or its affiliates in connectionfiled with the provision of the services.

We may terminate any or all of the services at any time for any reason (with or without cause) upon giving Kellwood the required advance notice for termination for that particular service. Additionally, the provision of the following services, which are services which require a term as a matter of lawSecurities and services which are based on a third-party agreement with a set term, shall terminate automatically upon the related date specified on the schedules to the Shared Services Agreement: Building Services NY; Tax; and Compensation & Benefits. If no specific notice requirement has been provided, 90 days prior written notice shall be required to be given. Upon the termination of certain services, Kellwood may no longer be in a position to provide certain other related services. Kellwood must notify us within 10 days following our request to terminate any services if they will no longer be able to provide other related services. Assuming we proceed with our request to terminate the original services, such related services shall also be terminated in connection with such termination.

We are invoiced by Kellwood monthly for these amounts and generally required to pay within 15 business days of receiving such invoice. The payments will be trued-up and can be disputed once each fiscal quarter. During fiscal 2013, we paid $1.7 million to Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement. In addition, as of February 1, 2014, we recorded $0.9 million in accrued expenses to recognize amount payable to Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement. Such amount was paid within 15 business days in accordance with the terms set forth in the Shares Services Agreement.

See “Shared Services Agreement” under Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Tax Receivable Agreement

Vince Holding Corp. entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders on November 27, 2013. We and our former subsidiaries have generated certain tax benefits (including NOLs and tax credits) prior to the Restructuring Transactions and will generate certain section 197 intangible deductions (the “Pre-IPO Tax Benefits”) which would reduce the actual liability for taxes that we might otherwise be required to pay. The Tax Receivable Agreement provides for payments to the Pre-IPO Stockholders in an amount equal to 85% of the aggregate reduction in taxes payable realized by us and our subsidiaries from the utilization of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits (the “Net Tax Benefit”).

For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the Net Tax Benefit equals (i) with respect to a taxable year, the excess, if any, of (A) our liability for taxes using the same methods, elections, conventions and similar practices used on the relevant company return assuming there were no Pre-IPO Tax Benefits over (B) our actual liability for taxes for such taxable year (the “Realized Tax Benefit”), plus (ii) for each prior taxable year, the excess, if any, of the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on an amended schedule applicable to such prior taxable year over the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the original tax benefit schedule for such prior taxable year, minus (iii) for each prior taxable year, the excess, if any, of the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the original tax

benefit schedule for such prior taxable year over the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the amended schedule for such prior taxable year; provided, however, that to extent any of the adjustments described in clauses (ii) and (iii) were reflected in the calculation of the tax benefit payment for any subsequent taxable year, such adjustments shall not be taken into account in determining the Net Tax Benefit for any subsequent taxable year.

While the Tax Receivable Agreement is designed with the objective of causing our annual cash costs attributable to federal, state and local income taxes (without regard to our continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits) to be the same as that which we would have paid had we not had the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits available to offset our federal, state and local taxable income, there are circumstances in which this may not be the case. In particular, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that any payments by us thereunder shall not be refundable. In that regard, the payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement differ from a payment of a federal income tax liability in that a tax refund would not be available to us under the Tax Receivable Agreement even if we were to incur a net operating loss for federal income tax purposes in a future tax year. Similarly, the Pre-IPO Stockholders will not reimburse us for any payments previously made if any tax benefits relating to such payments are subsequently disallowed, although the amount of any such tax benefits subsequently disallowed will reduce future payments (if any) otherwise owed to such Pre-IPO Stockholders. In addition, depending on the amount and timing of our future earnings (if any) and on other factors including the effect of any limitations imposed on our ability to use the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits, it is possible that all payments required under the Tax Receivable Agreement could become due within a relatively short period of time.

If we had not entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, we would be entitled to realize the full economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits to the extent allowed by federal, state and local law. The Tax Receivable Agreement is designed with the objective of causing our annual cash costs attributable to federal, state and local income taxes (without regard to our continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits) to be the same as we would have paid had we not had the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits available to offset our federal, state and local taxable income. As a result, stockholders who purchased shares in the IPO are not entitled to the economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits that would have been available if the Tax Receivable Agreement were not in effect, except to the extent of our continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Benefits.

Additionally, the payments we make to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement are not expected to give rise to any incidental tax benefits to us, such as deductions or an adjustment to the basis of our assets.

An affiliate of Sun Capital may elect to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below). In connection with any such termination, we are obligated to pay the present value (calculated at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 200 basis points as of such date) of all remaining Net Tax Benefit payments that would be required to be paid to the Pre-IPO Stockholders from such termination date, applying the valuation assumptions set forth in the Tax Receivable Agreement (the “Early Termination Period”). “Change of control,” as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement shall mean an event or series of events by which (i) Vince Holding Corp. shall cease directly or indirectly to own 100% of the capital stock of Vince, LLC; (ii) any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than one or more permitted investors, shall be the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) of capital stock having more, directly or indirectly, than 35% of the total voting power of all outstanding capital stock of Vince Holding Corp. in the election of directors, unless at such time the permitted investors are direct or indirect “beneficial owners” (as so defined) of capital stock of Vince Holding Corp. having a greater percentage of the total voting power of all outstanding capital stock of Vince Holding Corp. in the election of directors than that owned by each other “person” or “group” described above; (iii) for any reason whatsoever, a majority of the board of directors of Vince Holding Corp. shall not be continuing directors; or (iv) a “Change of Control” (or comparable term) shall occur under (x) any term loan or revolving credit facility of Vince Holding Corp. or its subsidiaries or (y) any unsecured, senior, senior subordinated or subordinated Indebtedness of Vince Holding Corp. or its subsidiaries, if, in each case, the outstanding principal amount thereof is in excess of $15,000,000. We may also terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement by paying the Early Termination Payment to

the Pre-IPO Stockholders. Additionally, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that in the event that we breach any material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the Tax Receivable Agreement in a case commenced under the Bankruptcy Code, then the Early Termination Payment plus other outstanding amounts under the Tax Receivable Agreement shall become due and payable.

The Tax Receivable Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (i) the date all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, (ii) the last day of the tax year including the tenth anniversary of the Restructuring Transactions and (iii) the mutual agreement of the parties thereto, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms thereof.

See “Tax Receivable Agreement” under Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Transfer Agreement

On November 27, 2013, Kellwood and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC entered into a transfer agreement (the “Transfer Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Transfer Agreement, the following transactions occurred:

Kellwood distributed the Vince, LLC equity interests to Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC in exchange for a $341.5 million promissory note issued by Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC (the “Kellwood Note Receivable”).

Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC immediately repaid the Kellwood Note Receivable in full using approximately $172 million of the net proceeds from the IPO contributed to it by Vince Holding Corp. along with $169.5 million of net borrowings under the Term Loan Facility.

Using the proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable, after giving effect to the contribution of $70.1 million of indebtedness under the Sun Term Loan Agreements to the capital of Vince Holding Corp. by affiliates of Sun Capital, Kellwood repaid and discharged the indebtedness outstanding under its revolving credit facility and the Sun Term Loan Agreements, and redeemed all of its issued and outstanding 12.875% Notes. Kellwood also redeemed $38.1 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.625% Notes at par pursuant to a tender offer. In addition, Kellwood also used such proceeds to pay certain restructuring fees to Sun Capital Management. See “—Management Services Agreement.” Kellwood also paid a debt recovery bonus of $6.0 million to Jill Granoff, our Chief Executive Officer. See “—Debt Recovery Bonus to Our Chief Executive Officer.”

Kellwood refinanced its revolving credit facility to, among other things, release Vince, LLC as a guarantor or obligor thereunder.

In accordance with the terms of the Transfer Agreement, Kellwood has agreed to indemnify us for any losses which we may suffer, sustain or become subject to, relating to the Kellwood business or in connection with any contract contributed to us by Kellwood which is not by its terms permitted to be assigned. Kellwood has also agreed to indemnify us for any losses associated with its failure to satisfy its obligations under the Transfer Agreement with respect to the repayment, repurchase, discharge or refinancing of certain of its indebtedness, as described in the immediately prior paragraph (including with respect to the removal of Vince, LLC as an obligor or guarantor under its refinanced revolving credit facility). Additionally, Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC has agreed to indemnify Kellwood against any losses which Kellwood may suffer, sustain or become subject to relating to the Vince business. The parties also agreed, upon the request of either party to, without further consideration, execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such other instruments of conveyance, transfer, assignment and confirmation, and shall take or cause to be taken, such further or other actions as the other party may deem necessary or desirable to carry out the intent and purpose of the Transfer Agreement and give effect to the transactions contemplated thereby.

Registration Agreement

Vince Holding Corp. entered into a registration agreement with Sun Cardinal and SCSF Cardinal and certain other investors in connection with the February 2008 acquisition of Kellwood Company by affiliates of Sun

Capital. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, holders of at least a majority of “Sun Registrable Securities” (which include (i) shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock originally issued to Sun Capital and its affiliates; (ii) all shares of common stock or other securities of Vince Holding Corp. issuable upon the conversion, exercise or exchange of Vince Holding Corp. common stock in connection with certain reorganization transactions; and (iii) any other shares of common stock or other securities of Vince Holding Corp. held by persons holding the securities described in clauses (i) and (ii)) are entitled to request that Vince Holding Corp. register its shares on a registration statement on one or more occasions in the future. Sun Capital and its affiliates and the other investors party to the registration agreement are also eligible to participate in certain registered offerings by Vince Holding Corp., subject to the restrictions in the registration rights agreement. We are obligated, within 30 days of receiving a request for registration, to file with the SEC a registration statement with respect to such registrable securities. In addition, we are obligated to use our best efforts to make short-form registrations on Form S-3 available for the sale of registrable securities. Vince Holding Corp. will pay the expenses of the investors party to the registration agreement in connection with their exercise of the rights described in this paragraph, other than underwriting commissions or selling commissions attributable to the registrable securities sold by the holders thereof, as well reimburse the holders of registrable securities included in any registration for the reasonable fees and disbursements of one counsel chosen by the holders of a majority of the registrable securities included in such registration. Our obligation to bear all registration expenses is absolute and does not depend on whether any contemplated offering is completed or whether any registration statement is declared effective.

Employment Agreements

See “Employment Agreements” under “Item 11—Executive Compensation” of this annual report on Form 10-K for a description of our employment agreements with certain of our executive officers.

Sun Capital Consulting Agreement

On November 27, 2013, we entered into an agreement with Sun Capital Management to (i) reimburse Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates providing consulting services under the agreement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing consulting services to us and (ii) provide Sun Capital Management with customary indemnification for any such services.

The agreement is scheduled to terminate on the tenth anniversary of our initial public offering (i.e. November 27, 2023). Under the consulting agreement, we have no obligation to pay Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates any consulting fees other than those which are approved by a majority of our directors that are not affiliated with Sun Capital. To the extent such fees are approved in the future, we will be obligated to pay such fees in addition to reimbursing Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates that provide us services under the consulting agreement for all reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by such party in connection with the provision of consulting services under the consulting agreement and any related matters. Reimbursement of such expenses shall not be conditioned upon the approval of a majority of our directors that are not affiliated with Sun Capital Management, and shall be payable in addition to any fees that such directors may approve.

Neither Sun Capital Management nor any of its affiliates are liable to us or our affiliates, securityholders or creditors for (1) any liabilities arising out of, related to, caused by, based upon or in connection with the performance of services under the consulting agreement, unless such liability is proven to have resulted directly and primarily from the willful misconduct or gross negligence of such person or (2) pursuing any outside activities or opportunities that may conflict with our best interests, which outside activities we consent to and approve under the consulting agreement, and which opportunities neither Sun Capital Management nor any of its affiliates will have any duty to inform us of. In no event will the aggregate of any liabilities of Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates exceed the aggregate of any fees paid under the consulting agreement.

In addition, we are required to indemnify Sun Capital Management, its affiliates and any successor by operation of law against any and all liabilities, whether or not arising out of or related to such party’s

performance of services under the consulting agreement, except to the extent proven to result directly and primarily from such person’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. We are also required to defend such parties in any lawsuits which may be brought against such parties and advance expenses in connection therewith. In the case of affiliates of Sun Capital Management that have rights to indemnification and advancement from affiliates of Sun Capital, we agree to be the indemnitor of first resort, to be liable for the full amounts of payments of indemnification required by any organizational document of such entity or any agreement to which such entity is a party, and that we will not make any claims against any affiliates of Sun Capital Partners for contribution, subrogation, exoneration or reimbursement for which they are liable under any organizational documents or agreement. Sun Capital Management may, in its sole discretion, elect to terminate the consulting agreement at any time. We may elect to terminate the consulting agreement if SCSF Cardinal, Sun Cardinal or any of their respective affiliates’ aggregate ownership of our equity securities falls below 30%.

Indemnification Agreements

We entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors on November 27, 2013. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL.

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that for so long as affiliates of Sun Capital own 30% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, Sun Cardinal, a Sun Capital affiliate, has the right to designate a majority of our board of directors. For so long as Sun Cardinal has the right to designate a majority of our board of directors, the directors designated by Sun Cardinal are expected to constitute a majority of each committee of our board of directors (other than the Audit Committee), and the chairman of each of the committees (other than the Audit Committee) is expected to be a director serving on the committee who is selected by affiliates of Sun Capital, provided that, at such time as we are not a “controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards, our committee membership will comply with all applicable requirements of those standards and a majority of our board of directors will be “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the NYSE, subject to any applicable phase in requirements.

Kellwood Note Receivable

Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC issued the Kellwood Note Receivable in the aggregate principal amount of $341.5 million to Kellwood Company, LLC on November 27, 2013, immediately prior to the consummation of our initial public offering. Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC repaid the Kellwood Note Receivable on the same day, using net proceeds from our initial public offering and net borrowings under the Term Loan Facility. No interest accrued under the Kellwood Note Receivable as the Kellwood Note Receivable was repaid on the date of issuance. See “—Transfer Agreement.”

Debt Recovery Bonus to Our Chief Executive Officer

Jill Granoff, our CEO, received a debt recovery bonus of $6.0 million (which included $0.4 million in a prior unpaid debt recovery bonus) in connection with the repayment of certain Kellwood indebtedness, calculated as 4.4% of the related debt recovery on November 27, 2013. See “Employment Agreements” under “Item 11—Executive Compensation” of this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information. Kellwood used proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable to pay this bonus to Ms. Granoff at the closing of the IPO. See “—Transfer Agreement.”

Certain Indebtedness to Sun Capital

Sun Capital Loan Agreement.Vince Holding Corp. was party to a Loan Authorization Agreement, originally dated February 13, 2008, by and between Vince Holding Corp, SCSF Kellwood Finance and Sun Kellwood, as successors to Bank of Montreal for a $72.0 million line of credit (as amended, the “Sun Capital Loan Agreement”). On December 28, 2012,Vince Holding Corp., SCSF Finance and Sun Kellwood Finance entered into an agreement forgiving all our unpaid interest accrued under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement prior to July 19, 2012. During fiscal 2013, we made no payments (whether with respect to principal or interest thereon) on our indebtedness under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement. Effective June 18, 2013, affiliates of Sun Capital contributed all indebtedness outstanding under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement to Vince Holding Corp. as a capital contribution, and the Sun Capital Loan Agreement ceased to be outstanding.

Sun Promissory Notes. Vince Holding Corp. was party to a $225.0 million Senior Subordinated Promissory Note and a $75.0 million Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, each in favor of Sun Kellwood Finance and originally dated May 2, 2008 (collectively and as amended, the “Sun Promissory Notes”). On December 28, 2012, Vince Holding Corp. and Sun Kellwood Finance entered into an agreement with respect to each Sun Promissory Notes forgiving all our unpaid interest which accrued prior to July 19, 2012. During fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, we paid no interest on our indebtedness under the Sun Promissory Notes and we paid none of the principal. Affiliates of Sun Capital contributed all indebtedness outstanding under the Sun Promissory Notes, respectively, to Vince Holding Corp. as a capital contribution effective June 18, 2013 and the Sun Promissory notes ceased to be outstanding.

Capital Contribution. On June 18, 2013, in anticipation of our initial public offering, affiliates of Sun Capital contributed $407.5 million of indebtedness under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement and the Sun Promissory Notes to Vince Holding Corp. Affiliates of Sun Capital contributed $70.1 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Sun Term Loan Agreements on November 27, 2013 as part of the Restructuring Transactions.

Sun Term Loan Agreements. Kellwood and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, affiliates of Sun Capital, as lenders, and Sun Kellwood Finance, as collateral agents were party to the Sun Term Loan Agreements. On September 1, 2012, Vince, LLC was joined to each of the Sun Term Loan Agreements and the related security agreement as a borrower party. Vince, LLC was released as a borrower party or guarantor thereunder in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering and the repayment of the Sun Term Loan Agreements. The indebtedness outstanding under the Sun Term Loan Agreements was repaidCommission in connection with our initial public offering. See “—Transfer Agreement.”

Management Services Agreement

In connection with the acquisition2017 annual meeting of Kellwood by affiliates of Sun Capital in 2008, Sun Capital Management, an affiliate of Sun Capital, entered into a Management Services Agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”) with Kellwood. Under this agreement, Sun Capital Management provided Kellwood with consulting and advisory services, including services relating to financing alternatives, financial reporting, accounting and management information systems. In exchange, Kellwood reimbursed Sun Capital Management for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with providing consulting and advisory services, additional and customary and reasonable fees for management consulting services provided in connection with corporate events, and also paid an annual management fee equal to $2.2 million payable in equal quarterly installments. A portion of the management fees incurred by Kellwood were charged to Vince, LLC in the amount of $0.4 million for fiscal 2013.

Upon the consummation of certain corporate events involving Kellwood or its direct or indirect subsidiaries (including restructurings and equity offerings), Kellwood was required to pay Sun Capital Management a transaction fee in an amount equal to 1% of the aggregate consideration (including assumed debt and long-term liabilities and the value of any refinancing consummated by Kellwood in connection with our initial public

offering) paid to or by Kellwood and any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries or stockholders. This restructuring fee totaled $3.3 million and was repaid at the closing of our initial public offering with proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable. The Management Services Agreement was terminated on November 27, 2013 in connection with the closing of our initial public offering and the payment of the related restructuring fee to Sun Capital Management.

Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

On November 21, 2013 in anticipation of the consummation of our initial public offering, we adopted a written statement of policy with respect to related party transactions, which is administered by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Under our related party transaction policy, a “Related Party Transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship between us or any of our subsidiaries and a Related Person not including any transactions involving less than $120,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions, or transactions that have received pre-approval of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. A “Related Person” is any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees, any stockholder beneficially owning in excess of 5% of our stock or securities exchangeable for our stock, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is an executive officer, a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest in such entity.

Pursuant to our related party transaction policy, a Related Party Transaction may only be consummated or may only continue if:

our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the terms of the policy; or

the chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee pre-approves or ratifies such transaction and the amount involved in the transaction is less than $120,000, provided that for the Related Party Transaction to continue it must be approved by our Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

If advance approval of a Related Party Transaction is not feasible, then that Related Party Transaction will be considered and, if our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified, at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If we decide to proceed with a Related Party Transaction without advance approval, then the terms of such Related Party Transaction must permit termination by us without further material obligation in the event our ratification is not forthcoming at our next regularly scheduled meeting.

Transactions with Related Persons, though not classified as Related Party Transactions by our related party transaction policy and thus not subject to its review and approval requirements, may still need to be disclosed if required by the applicable securities laws, rules and regulations.

Director Independence

Our board of directors consists of six members, Messrs. Metz, Brody, Neimark, Griffith and Bowman and Ms. Granoff. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Metz, Brody, Neimark, Griffith and Bowman meets the definition of “independent director” under applicable SEC and New York Stock Exchange rules.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

During fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and in that capacity rendered and unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and forThe information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the three years ended February 1, 2014.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expectedCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be billed by our independent registered accounting firm in each offiled with the last two fiscal years:

Type of Fees

  Fiscal 2013   Fiscal 2012 

Audit fees

  $1,552,270    $1,065,275  

Audit-related fees

   394,830     805,580  

Tax fees

   358,229     366,007  

All other fees

   —       40,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,305,329    $2,276,862  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Audit Fees

These amounts represent feesSecurities and related expenses billed or expected to be billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual financial statement for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 and the reviews of interim period financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and Registration Statements on Form S-1.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-Related Fees represent fees and related expenses billed or expected to be billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees” above. Audit-Related Fees in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 were primarily related to due diligence servicesExchange Commission in connection with contemplated acquisitions and divestitures, and services in connection with the initial public offering and Restructuring Transactions.our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of fees and related expenses incurred for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local jurisdictions as well as services related to Restructuring Transactions in connection with the IPO.

All Other Fees

All Other Fees represent fees and related expenses incurred for professional services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers other than those reported under categories above.

Auditor Independence

The audit committee has considered whether the provision of the above-noted services is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence and has determined that the provision of such services has not adversely affected the auditor’s independence.

Policy and Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services

The audit committee has established policies and procedures regarding the pre-approval of audit and other services that our independent auditor may perform for us, subject to the SEC rules which provide that certain non-audit services accounting for less than five percent of the total fees paid to the independent auditor be approved by the audit committee retroactively. In accordance with the charter of the audit committee, approval can be made by the chair of the audit committee (or any member of the audit committee if the chair is not available) in between committee meetings and is required to disclose the pre-approved services to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting.

PartPART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

(a)

Financial Statements and Financial statement Schedules. See “Index to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements” which is located on page F-1.F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

(b)

Exhibits. See the exhibit index which is included herein.

Exhibit Listing:

 

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

  3.1

Amended & Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vince Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

  3.2

Amended & Restated Bylaws of Vince Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

  4.1

Form of Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 12, 2013)

  4.2

Registration Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2008, among Apparel Holding Corp., Sun Cardinal, LLC, SCSF Cardinal, LLC and the Other Investors party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (FileNo. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.1Contribution and Acceptance Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, by and between Kellwood Company and Vince, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Vince Holding Corp.’sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.2

10.1

Shared Services Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, between Vince, LLC and Kellwood Company, LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

47


Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

10.3

10.2

Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, between Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, the Stockholders, and Sun Cardinal, LLC as Stockholder Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

10.4

10.3

Form of Transfer Agreement between Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 12, 2013)
10.5Form of Kellwood Note Receivable between Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on October 10, 2013)
10.6

Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, between Vince Holding Corp. and Sun Capital Partners Management V, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.7$75,000,000 Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of May 2, 2008, by Apparel Holding Corp. to SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.8Amendment No. 1 to Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of July 19, 2012, by and between Apparel Holding Corp. and SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed on September 24, 2013)
10.9Agreement Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of December 28, 2012, by and between Apparel Holding Corp. and SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.10$225,000,000 Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of May 2, 2008, by Apparel Holding Corp. to Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.11Amendment No. 1 to Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of July 19, 2012, by and between Apparel Holding Corp. and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.12Agreement Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Senior Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of December 28, 2012, by and between Apparel Holding Corp. and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.13Bank of Montreal Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2008, by and between Bank of Montreal and Apparel Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.14First Amendment to Bank of Montreal Loan Authorization Agreement, dated May 2, 2008, by and between Bank of Montreal and Apparel Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.15Second Amendment to Bank of Montreal Loan Authorization Agreement, dated August 13, 2008, by and between Bank of Montreal and Apparel Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.16Third Amendment to Bank of Montreal Loan Authorization Agreement, dated December 28, 2012, by and between Bank of Montreal and Apparel Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.17Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2009, by and among Bank of Montreal, SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC, Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC and Apparel Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.18Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2011, by and among Kellwood Company and BMO Harris Financing, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.19Amendment No. 4 to Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of July 19, 2012, by and among Apparel Holding Corp., SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.20Agreement Regarding Amendment No. 4 to Loan Authorization Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2012, by and among Apparel Holding Corp., SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.21Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2011, among Kellwood Company and its Domestic Subsidiaries, other Obligors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1(File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.22Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of March 23, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.23Consent and Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of April 20, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.24Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of July 25, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.25Consent and Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of December 31, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.26Second Amended and Restated Term A Loan Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2012, among Kellwood Company and its Domestic Subsidiaries, other Obligors, SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.4

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.27Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Term A Loan Agreement, entered into as of July 2012, by and among the Lenders, Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.28Consent and Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Term A Loan Agreement, entered into as of December 31, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.29Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Term A Loan Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2013, by and among Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries, the other Obligors, SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.30Fifth Amended and Restated Term Loan B/C/D/E/F/G Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2013, among Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries, other Obligors, SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC and Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.31Term Loan Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2011, among Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries, other Obligors and Cerberus Business Finance LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.32Consent and Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of April 20, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Cerberus Business Finance LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.33Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of July 25, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Cerberus Business Finance LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.34Consent and Amendment No. 3 to Term Loan Agreement, entered into as of December 31, 2012, by and among the Lenders, Cerberus Business Finance LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.35Modification to Consent and Amendment No. 4 to Term Loan Agreement, entered into as of March 2013, by and among the Lenders, Cerberus Business Finance LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.36Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement, entered into as of May 3, 2013, by and among the Lenders, Cerberus Business Finance LLC, Kellwood Company, the Domestic Subsidiaries and the other Obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.37Credit Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, by and among Vince, LLC, Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Syndication Agent, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and Cantor Fitzgerald Securities, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

10.38

10.5

Credit Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, by and among Vince, LLC, the guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, the other lenders party thereto and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)

10.39

10.6†

Indenture

Employment Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2009, byNovember 21, 2014, between Melissa Wallace and among Kellwood Company, the Guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank National Association Vince Holding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4010.13 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statementthe Company’s Annual Report on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336)10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.40Indenture Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1997, by and between Kellwood Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.41Indenture Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2004, by and between Kellwood Company and Union Bank of California, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.42Joinder Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2012, by and between Vince, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.43Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2012, among Vince, LLC, Kellwood Company, the other Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.44Joinder to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2012, by Vince, LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.45Joinder to Second Amended and Restated Term Loan A Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2012, by Vince, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.46Joinder to Fourth Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2012, by Vince, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit DescriptionMarch 27, 2015)

10.47†

10.7†

Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2012, between Jill Granoff and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.48†Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2012, between Jill Granoff and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.49†Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2013, between Jill Granoff and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.50†Debt Recovery Bonus Side Letter Agreement, dated June 11, 2013, between Jill Granoff and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.51†(a)Employment Agreement, dated March 2013, between Karin Gregersen and Vince, LLC
10.52†(a)Employment Agreement, dated April 5 2013, between Michele Sizemore and Vince, LLC
10.53†(a)Employment Agreement, dated September 25, 2013, between Jay Dubiner and Vince, LLC
10.54†(a)Employment Agreement, dated August 8, 2013, between Deena Gianoncelli and Kellwood Company
10.55†(a)Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, by and among Kellwood Company, LLC, Apparel Holding Corp. and Jill Granoff
10.56†Employment Offer Letter, dated as of November 2, 2012, between Lisa Klinger and Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.57†(a)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2013, by and between Kellwood Company, LLC and Apparel Holding Corp.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 4, 2014)

10.58†

10.8†

2010 Stock Option Plan of Kellwood Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.59†

10.9†

Form of 2010 Stock Option Plan grant agreement for executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

10.60†2010 Stock Plan of Kellwood Company Grant Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2012, by and between Kellwood Company and Jill Granoff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.61†Amendment to Grant Agreement, between Kellwood Company and Jill Granoff(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.62†

10.10†

First Amendment to Grant Agreement, dated December 30, 2012, between Kellwood Company and Jill Granoff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.63†Second Amendment to Grant Agreement, dated November 26, 2013, between Kellwood Company and Jill Granoff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)
10.64†2010 Stock Plan of Kellwood Company Grant Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2012, by and between Kellwood Company and Lisa Klinger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 24, 2013)
10.65†First Amendment to Grant Agreement, dated November 26, 2013, between Kellwood Company and Lisa Klinger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Vince Holding Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 27, 2013)
10.66†

Form of Indemnification Agreement (for directors and officers affiliated with Sun Capital Partners) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013)

10.67†

10.11†

Form of Indemnification Agreement (for directors and officers not affiliated with Sun Capital Partners) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013)

10.68†

10.12†

Vince Holding Corp. 2013 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. (333-191336) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 12, 2013)

10.69†

10.13†

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013)

10.70†

10.14†

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Vince Holding Corp.’sthe Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013)

10.71†

10.15†

Form of

Vince Holding Corp. Amended and Restated 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67Annex A to the Company’s RegistrationInformation Statement on Form S-1 (File No. (333-191336)Schedule 14C filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 12, 2013September 3, 2015)

21.1(a)

10.16

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2015, by and among the Company, the guarantors parties thereto, BofA, as administrative agent, and each lender party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 8, 2015).

10.17

First Amendment to the Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015, between Vince Holding Corp., the Stockholders, and the Stockholder Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

10.18†

Employment Offer Letter, dated as of September 1, 2015, from Vince Holding Corp. to David Stefko relating to his appointment as the Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

48


Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

10.19†

Employment Offer Letter, dated as of October 22, 2015, from Vince, LLC to Brendan Hoffman relating to his appointment as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

10.20†

Transition Services and Separation Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2015, between Vince Holding Corp and Jill Granoff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

10.21†

Confidential Severance Agreement and General Release, dated as of August 6, 2015, between Vince Holding Corp and Lisa Klinger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

10.22†

Severance Agreement and General Release, dated as of September 28, 2015, between Vince, LLC and Karin Gregersen McLennan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2015).

10.23

Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Vince, LLC and Rea Laccone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016).

10.24

Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Vince, LLC and Christopher LaPolice (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016).

10.25†

Employment Offer Letter, dated as of January 12, 2016, from Vince, LLC to David Stefko relating to his appointment as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2016).

10.26

Investment Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2016, by and among Vince Holding Corp., Sun Cardinal, LLC and SCSF Cardinal, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2016).

10.27†

Employment Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2015, between Vince, LLC to Katayone Adeli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2016).

10.28†

Confidential Severance Agreement and General Release, dated as of February 29, 2016, between Vince, LLC and Michele Sizemore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2016).

10.29†

Employment Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2016, between Vince, LLC to Mark Engebretson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 8, 2016).

10.30†

Amendment No. 1 to Offer Letter, dated as of September 12, 2016, between Vince, LLC to Mark Engebretson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 8, 2016).

21.1

List of subsidiaries of Vince Holding Corp.

23.1(a)

23.1

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

31.1(a)

31.1

CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2(a)

31.2

CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1(a)

32.1

CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2(a)

32.2

CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101(a)

101

Financial Statements in XBRL Format

 

Indicates exhibits that constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements

(a)

ITEM 16.

Furnished with this annual report on Form

FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

None.

SIGNATURES

49


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

VINCE HOLDING CORP.

By:

By:

/s/ Jill Granoff        Brendan Hoffman

Name: Jill Granoff

Brendan Hoffman

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates listed.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Jill Granoff

Jill GranoffBrendan Hoffman

Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Director(Principal Executive Officer) (Director)

April 4, 201428, 2017

Brendan Hoffman

/s/ Lisa Klinger

Lisa KlingerDavid Stefko

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)Accounting Officer)

April 4, 201428, 2017

David Stefko

/s/ Christopher T. Metz

Christopher T. MetzJonathan H. Borell

Director and Chairman

April 4, 201428, 2017

Jonathan H. Borell

/s/ Robert A. Bowman

Director

April 28, 2017

Robert A. Bowman

Director

April 4, 2014

/s/ Mark E. Brody

Mark E. BrodyRyan J. Esko

Director

April 4, 201428, 2017

Ryan J. Esko

/s/ Jerome Griffith

Director

April 28, 2017

Jerome Griffith

Director

April 4, 2014

/s/ Jason H. Neimark

Jason H. NeimarkMarc J. Leder

Director

April 4, 201428, 2017

Marc J. Leder

/s/ Donald V. Roach

Director

April 28, 2017

Donald V. Roach

/s/ Eugenia Ulasewicz

Director

April 28, 2017

Eugenia Ulasewicz


INDEX TO THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATEDCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 


ReportReport of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Vince Holding Corp.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flowsindex present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Vince Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries at February 1, 2014as of January 28, 2017 and February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying indexpresents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.  We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has determined there is risk of future non-compliance with its debt covenant that raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis, MissouriNew York, New York

April 4, 2014

28, 2017

F-2


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

   February 1,
2014
  February 2,
2013
 

Assets

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $21,484   $317  

Trade receivables, net

   40,198    33,933  

Inventories, net

   33,956    18,887  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   8,093    5,298  

Current assets of discontinued operations

   —      141,357  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   103,731    199,792  

Property, plant and equipment:

   

Building and improvements

   15,355    9,373  

Machinery and equipment

   2,439    1,449  

Capitalized software

   630    51  

Construction in process

   1,200    219  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment

   19,624    11,092  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (6,009  (4,104
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   13,615    6,988  

Intangible assets, net

   110,243    110,842  

Goodwill

   63,746    63,746  

Deferred income taxes and other assets

   123,007    1,281  

Long-term assets of discontinued operations

   —      59,475  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $414,342   $442,124  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

   23,847    18,478  

Accrued salaries and employee benefits

   5,425    11,151  

Other accrued expenses

   9,061    1,276  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

   —      159,141  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   38,333    190,046  

Long-term debt

   170,000    391,434  

Deferred income taxes and other

   3,443    14,556  

Other liabilities

   169,015    —    

Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations

   —      407,353  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

   

Stockholders’ equity (deficit):

   

Common Stock at $0.01 par value (100,000,000 shares authorized, 36,723,727 and 26,211,130 issued and outstanding, respectively)

   367    262  

Additional paid in capital

   1,008,549    386,419  

Accumulated deficit

   (975,300  (947,880

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (65  (66
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   33,551    (561,265
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

  $414,342   $442,124  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

20,978

 

 

$

6,230

 

Trade receivables, net

 

 

10,336

 

 

 

9,400

 

Inventories, net

 

 

38,529

 

 

 

36,576

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

4,768

 

 

 

8,027

 

Total current assets

 

 

74,611

 

 

 

60,233

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

42,945

 

 

 

37,769

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

77,698

 

 

 

109,046

 

Goodwill

 

 

41,435

 

 

 

63,746

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

89,280

 

Other assets

 

 

2,791

 

 

 

3,494

 

Total assets

 

$

239,480

 

 

$

363,568

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

37,022

 

 

$

28,719

 

Accrued salaries and employee benefits

 

 

3,427

 

 

 

5,755

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

9,992

 

 

 

37,174

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

50,441

 

 

 

71,648

 

Long-term debt

 

 

48,298

 

 

 

57,615

 

Deferred rent

 

 

16,892

 

 

 

14,965

 

Other liabilities

 

 

137,830

 

 

 

140,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' (deficit) equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock at $0.01 par value (100,000,000 shares authorized, 49,427,606 and 36,779,417 shares issued and outstanding at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, respectively)

 

 

494

 

 

 

368

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

1,082,727

 

 

 

1,012,677

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(1,097,137

)

 

 

(934,478

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(65

)

Total stockholders' (deficit) equity

 

 

(13,981

)

 

 

78,502

 

Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit) equity

 

$

239,480

 

 

$

363,568

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data and share amounts)

  

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Net sales

  $288,170   $240,352   $175,255  

Cost of products sold

   155,154    132,156    89,545  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   133,016    108,196    85,710  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   83,663    67,260    42,793  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   49,353    40,936    42,917  

Interest expense, net

   18,011    68,684    81,364  

Other expense, net

   679    769    478  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes

   30,663    (28,517  (38,925

Provision for income taxes

   7,268    1,178    2,997  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   23,395    (29,695  (41,922

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (50,815  (78,014  (105,944
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(27,420 $(107,709 $(147,866
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic:

    

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83   $(1.13 $(1.60

Net loss from discontinued operations

   (1.81  (2.98  (4.04
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(0.98 $(4.11 $(5.64
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted:

    

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

  $0.83   $(1.13 $(1.60

Net loss from discontinued operations

   (1.81  (2.98  (4.04
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(0.98 $(4.11 $(5.64
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   28,119,794    26,211,130    26,211,130  

Diluted

   28,272,925    26,211,130    26,211,130  

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net sales

$

268,199

 

 

$

302,457

 

 

$

340,396

 

Cost of products sold

 

145,380

 

 

 

169,941

 

 

 

173,567

 

Gross profit

 

122,819

 

 

 

132,516

 

 

 

166,829

 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

53,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

134,430

 

 

 

116,790

 

 

 

96,579

 

(Loss) income from operations

 

(64,672

)

 

 

15,726

 

 

 

70,250

 

Interest expense, net

 

3,932

 

 

 

5,680

 

 

 

9,698

 

Other expense, net

 

329

 

 

 

1,733

 

 

 

835

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(68,933

)

 

 

8,313

 

 

 

59,717

 

Provision for income taxes

 

93,726

 

 

 

3,214

 

 

 

23,994

 

Net (loss) income

$

(162,659

)

 

$

5,099

 

 

$

35,723

 

(Loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.97

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

$

(3.50

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

0.93

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

36,770,430

 

 

 

36,730,490

 

Diluted

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

37,529,227

 

 

 

38,244,906

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(LOSS) INCOME

(In thousands)

 

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Net loss

  $(27,420 $(107,709 $(147,866

Foreign currency translation adjustment

   1    (3  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

  $(27,419 $(107,712 $(147,867
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(162,659

)

 

$

5,099

 

 

$

35,723

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(162,659

)

 

$

5,099

 

 

$

35,723

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

  Common Stock             
  Number of
Shares
Outstanding
  Par
Value
  Additional
Paid in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Total
Stockholders���
Equity (Deficit)
 

Balance as of January 29, 2011

  26,211,130   $262   $96,886   $(692,305 $(62 $(595,219

Comprehensive loss:

      

Net loss

  —      —      —      (147,866  —      (147,866

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —      —      —      —      (1  (1

Share-based compensation expense

  —      —      65    —      —      65  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of January 28, 2012

  26,211,130    262    96,951    (840,171  (63  (743,021

Comprehensive loss:

      

Net loss

  —      —      —      (107,709  —      (107,709

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —      —      —      —      (3  (3

Share-based compensation expense

  —      —      367    —      —      367  

Capital contribution from stockholder

  —      —      289,101    —      —      289,101  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of February 2, 2013

  26,211,130    262    386,419    (947,880  (66  (561,265

Comprehensive loss:

      

Net loss

  —      —      —      (27,420  —      (27,420

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  —      —      —      —      1    1  

Issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock, net of certain costs incurred

  10,000,000    100    185,900    —      —      186,000  

Share-based compensation expense

  —      —      898    —      —      898  

Exercise and settlement of stock options

  512,597    5    37    —      —      42  

Capital contribution from stockholder

  —      —      407,527    —      —      407,527  

Recognition of certain deferred tax assets, net

  —      —      127,833    —      —      127,833  

Recognition of tax receivable agreement obligation

  —      —      (173,146  —      —      (173,146

Separation of non-Vince businesses and settlement of Kellwood Note Receivable

  —      —      73,081    —      —      73,081  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of February 1, 2014

  36,723,727   $367   $1,008,549   $(975,300 $(65 $33,551  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Shares Outstanding

 

 

Par Value

 

 

Additional Paid-In Capital

 

 

Accumulated Deficit

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

 

Total Stockholders' Equity

 

Balance as of February 1, 2014

 

 

36,723,727

 

 

$

367

 

 

$

1,008,549

 

 

$

(975,300

)

 

$

(65

)

 

$

33,551

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,723

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,896

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

22,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

Restricted stock unit vestings

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax receivable agreement obligation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

624

 

Balance as of January 31, 2015

 

 

36,748,245

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

1,011,244

 

 

 

(939,577

)

 

 

(65

)

 

 

71,969

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,099

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,259

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

26,209

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

Restricted stock unit vestings

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 30, 2016

 

 

36,779,417

 

 

 

368

 

 

 

1,012,677

 

 

 

(934,478

)

 

 

(65

)

 

 

78,502

 

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(162,659

)

 

 

 

 

 

(162,659

)

Common stock issuance, net of certain costs

 

 

11,818,181

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

63,992

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,110

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,344

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,344

 

Exercise of stock options and issuance of

common stock under employee stock purchase plan

 

 

815,428

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

4,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,722

 

Restricted stock unit vestings

 

 

14,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 28, 2017

 

 

49,427,606

 

 

$

494

 

 

$

1,082,727

 

 

$

(1,097,137

)

 

$

(65

)

 

$

(13,981

)

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

  Fiscal Year 
  2013  2012  2011 

Operating activities

   

Net loss

 $(27,420 $(107,709 $(147,866

Loss from discontinued operations

  (50,815  (78,014  (105,944

Add (deduct) items not affecting operating cash flows:

   

Depreciation

  2,186    1,411    1,102  

Amortization of intangible assets

  599    598    599  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

  178    —      —    

Deferred income taxes

  7,225    1,147    2,979  

Share-based compensation expense

  347    —      —    

Capitalized PIK Interest

  15,883    68,684    81,363  

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

  262    —      8  

Changes in assets and liabilities:

   

Receivables, net

  (6,265  (7,459  (12,174

Inventories, net

  (15,069  (8,360  (2,592

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  1,681    (2,455  (490

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  3,235    17,208    2,937  

Other assets and liabilities

  309    295    291  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities—continuing operations

  33,966    41,374    32,101  

Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

  (54,667  (67,408  (70,355
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (20,701  (26,034  (38,254
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

   

Payments for capital expenditures

  (10,073  (1,821  (1,450

Payments for contingent purchase price

  —      (806  (58,465
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities—continuing operations

  (10,073  (2,627  (59,915

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities—discontinued operations

  (5,936  20,088    (9,637
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

  (16,009  17,461    (69,552
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

   

Proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan Facility

  175,000    —      —    

Payment for Term Loan Facility

  (5,000  —      —    

Payment for Kellwood Note Receivable

  (341,500  —      —    

Fees paid for Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility

  (5,146  —      —    

Proceeds from common stock issuance, net of certain transaction costs

  186,000    —      —    

Stock option exercises

  42    —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities—continuing operations

  9,396    —      —    

Net cash provided by financing activities—discontinued operations

  46,917    8,615    104,451  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  56,313    8,615    104,451  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents

  19,603    42    (3,355

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  1,881    1,839    5,194  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  21,484    1,881    1,839  

Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations, end of period

  —      (1,564  (1,403
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period

 $21,484   $317   $436  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information, continuing operations

   

Cash payments for interest

 $1,018   $—     $—    

Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds

  31    18    15  

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information, discontinued operations

   

Cash payments for interest

  20,644    30,454    23,665  

Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds

  566    882    1,030  

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities, continuing operations

 

Capital expenditures in accounts payable

  222    160    27  

Accrued purchase consideration for acquisitions

  —      —      806  

Forgiveness of principal and capitalized accrued interest on related-party debt

  (407,527  (289,101  —    

Capital contribution from stockholder

  407,527    289,101    —    

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities, discontinued operations

   

Accrued adjustment to sale proceeds from disposed business

  —      221    —    

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(162,659

)

 

$

5,099

 

 

$

35,723

 

Add (deduct) items not affecting operating cash flows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

 

53,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

8,684

 

 

 

8,350

 

 

 

5,267

 

Impairment of property and equipment

 

 

2,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for inventories

 

 

839

 

 

 

16,263

 

 

 

3,719

 

Deferred rent

 

 

413

 

 

 

1,723

 

 

 

3,045

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

93,444

 

 

 

2,745

 

 

 

23,248

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

1,344

 

 

 

1,259

 

 

 

1,896

 

Other

 

 

701

 

 

 

1,634

 

 

 

1,532

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net

 

 

(936

)

 

 

24,397

 

 

 

6,401

 

Inventories

 

 

(2,792

)

 

 

(15,420

)

 

 

(7,182

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

598

 

 

 

3,441

 

 

 

2,809

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(24,414

)

 

 

1,044

 

 

 

3,066

 

Other assets and liabilities

 

 

(25

)

 

 

1,093

 

 

 

742

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

 

(29,660

)

 

 

51,628

 

 

 

80,266

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments for capital expenditures

 

 

(14,287

)

 

 

(17,591

)

 

 

(19,699

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(14,287

)

 

 

(17,591

)

 

 

(19,699

)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

181,367

 

 

 

115,127

 

 

 

50,500

 

Repayment of borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

(191,167

)

 

 

(123,127

)

 

 

(27,500

)

Repayment of borrowings under the Term Loan Facility

 

 

 

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

(105,000

)

Proceeds from common stock issuance, net of transaction costs

 

 

63,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises and issuance of common stock

under employee stock purchase plan

 

 

4,722

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

175

 

Fees paid for Term Loan Facility and Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

 

 

 

(94

)

 

 

(114

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

58,695

 

 

 

(27,919

)

 

 

(81,939

)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

14,748

 

 

 

6,118

 

 

 

(21,372

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

6,230

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

21,484

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

20,978

 

 

$

6,230

 

 

$

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash payments on TRA obligation

 

$

29,700

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,199

 

Cash payments for interest

 

 

2,952

 

 

 

3,838

 

 

 

8,737

 

Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds

 

 

330

 

 

 

1,491

 

 

 

88

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

1,054

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

452

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-7


VINCE HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except per share data and share amounts)

Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

On November 27, 2013, Vince Holding Corp. (“VHC” or the “Company”), previously known as Apparel Holding Corp., closed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of its common stock and completed a series of restructuring transactions (the “Restructuring Transactions”) through which (i) Kellwood Holding, LLC acquired the non-Vince businesses, which includeincluded Kellwood Company, LLC (“Kellwood Company” or Kellwood”), from the Company. The Company owns and (ii) the Company continues to own and operateoperates the Vince business, which includes Vince, LLC.

The historical financial information presented herein asPrior to the IPO and the Restructuring Transactions, VHC was a diversified apparel company operating a broad portfolio of February 1, 2014 includes onlyfashion brands, which included the Vince business. As a result of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the non-Vince businesses and all historical financial information prior to November 27, 2013 includeswere separated from the Vince business, as continuing operations and the stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions (the “Pre-IPO Stockholders”) (through their ownership of Kellwood Holding, LLC) retained the full ownership and control of the non-Vince businesses asbusinesses. The Vince business is now the sole operating business of VHC.

On November 18, 2016, Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Company, LLC entered into a componentUnit Purchase Agreement with Sino Acquisition, LLC (the “Kellwood Purchaser”) whereby the Kellwood Purchaser agreed to purchase all of discontinued operations.the outstanding equity interests of Kellwood Company, LLC. Prior to the closing, Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC and Kellwood Company, LLC conducted a pre-closing reorganization pursuant to which certain assets of Kellwood Company, LLC were distributed to a newly formed subsidiary of Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC, St. Louis Transition, LLC (“St. Louis, LLC”). The transaction closed on December 21, 2016 (the “Kellwood Sale”). St. Louis, LLC is anticipated to be wound down by or around December 2017.

(A)Description of Business: Established in 2002, Vince is a prominent, high-growth contemporary fashionglobal luxury brand best known for utilizing luxe fabrications and innovative techniques to create a product assortment that combines urban utility and modern effortless stylestyle. From its edited core collection of ultra-soft cashmere knits and everyday luxury essentials. We reach ourcotton tees, Vince has evolved into a global lifestyle brand and destination for both women’s and men’s apparel and accessories. The Company reaches its customers through a variety of channels, specifically through premiermajor wholesale department stores and specialty stores in the United States (“U.S.”) and select international markets, as well as through ourthe Company’s branded retail locations and ourthe Company’s website. We design ourThe Company designs products in the U.S. and sourcesources the vast majority of our products from contract manufacturers outside the U.S., primarily in Asia and South America.Asia. Products are manufactured to meet ourthe Company’s product specifications and labor standards.

(B)Basis of Presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The consolidated financial statements include ourthe Company’s accounts and the accounts of ourthe Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The amounts and disclosures included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise indicated, are presented on a continuing operations basis. In the opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) and disclosures necessary to make the information presented therein not misleading. As used

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial information in this report, unlessorder to conform to the context requires otherwise, “our,” “us” and “we” refer to VHC and its consolidated subsidiaries.current period’s presentation. The reclassification had no impact on previously reported net income or stockholders’ equity.

(C)Fiscal YearVHCThe Company operates on a fiscal calendar widely used by the retail industry that results in a given fiscal year consisting of a 52 or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31 of the following year.

31.

References to “fiscal year 2013”2016” or “fiscal 2013” refer to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014;

References to “fiscal year 2012” or “fiscal 2012” refer to the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013;

References to “fiscal year 2011” or “fiscal 2011”2016” refer to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.2017;

References to “fiscal year 2015” or “fiscal 2015” refer to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016; and

References to “fiscal year 2014” or “fiscal 2014” refer to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.

Fiscal years 20132016, 2015 and 20112014 consisted of a 52-week period.

(D) Sources and Uses of Liquidity: The Company’s sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, if any, borrowings available under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Company’s ability to access capital markets. The Company’s primary cash needs are capital expenditures for new stores and related leasehold improvements, meeting debt service requirements, paying amounts due under the Tax Receivable Agreement and funding working capital requirements.

F-8


During fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016, the Company has made significant strategic decisions and investments to reset and support the future growth of the Vince brand. Management believes these significant investments are essential to the commitment to developing a strong foundation from which the Company can drive consistent profitable growth for the long term. In order to enhance the Company’s liquidity position in support of these investments, the Company performed the following actions:

During the three months ended April 30, 2016, the Company completed a rights offering and related Investment Agreement transactions, issuing an aggregate of 11,818,181 shares of its common stock for total gross proceeds of $65,000. See Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” for additional details. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds received from the Rights Offering and related Investment Agreement to (1) repay the amount owed by the Company under the Tax Receivable Agreement with Sun Cardinal, for itself and as a representative of the other stockholders party thereto, for the tax benefit with respect to the 2014 taxable year including accrued interest, totaling $22,262 (see Note 12 “Related Party Transactions” for additional details), and (2) repay all then outstanding indebtedness, totaling $20,000, under the Revolving Credit Facility, allowing full borrowing capacity under this facility at that time.

To provide the Company with greater flexibility on certain debt covenants while it was executing brand reset strategies, the Company retained approximately $21,000 of proceeds from the rights offering discussed above at Vince Holding Corp. to be utilized in the event a Specified Equity Contribution (as defined under the Term Loan Facility) was required under the Term Loan Facility. See Note 4 “Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements” for additional details. Any amounts contributed from Vince Holding Corp. as a Specified Equity Contribution can then be utilized for normal operating needs. During April 2017, the Company utilized $6,241 of the funds held by Vince Holding Corp. to make a Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of January 28, 2017 so that the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio would not exceed 3.25 to 1.00. As of April 28, 2017, Vince Holding Corp. retains $15,196 of funds and management anticipates it will be necessary to make an additional Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of April 29, 2017, utilizing a portion of this retained cash.

In order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into a side letter (the “Letter”) with Bank of America, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility to temporarily modify certain covenants. On April 14, 2017, the Letter was amended and restated to further increase borrowing flexibility through July 31, 2017 and allow the Company to borrow against a portion of the cash retained at Vince Holding Corp. See Note 4 “Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements” for additional details.

In accordance with the new accounting guidance that became effective for the Company’s fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (see (T) Recent Accounting Pronouncements below for further details), management has the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. As required by this standard, management’s evaluation does not initially consider the potential mitigating effects of management’s plans that have not been fully implemented as of the date the financial statements are issued. In performing this initial evaluation, management concluded that the following conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations, specifically its ability to comply with the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility. Since fiscal 2015, the Company has undertaken the task to reset the brand during a challenging retail environment, making strategic decisions and investments which had a cost to the short-term results but were necessary for the long-term sustainability of the Vince brand. The Company raised $65,000 under the Rights Offering, which was completed in anticipation of the difficulty of these undertakings. During fiscal 2016, the Company’s sales results did not meet expectations. Management’s future projections consider the uncertainty of trends in the retail environment in which the Company operates and anticipate that the Company will make an additional Specified Equity Contribution in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility for the first fiscal quarter of 2017. Beyond the first fiscal quarter, scenarios, including those beyond our control, could develop that include unanticipated declines in sales and operating results requiring additional Specified Equity Contributions. Although the Company would have cash retained by Vince Holding Corp. to make additional contributions, there are limits on the number of contributions that can be made in any four fiscal quarter period and fiscalthere is a limit on the amount of cash that has been retained for the purpose of making Specified Equity Contributions.

Understanding the difficulties to project the current retail environment, the historical sales performance of the Company and as management’s plans to mitigate the substantial doubt have not been fully executed, management has therefore concluded there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year 2012 consistedafter the date that the financial statements are issued. Management cannot predict with certainty the impact of various factors, including a 53-week period.challenging retail environment, on the Company’s business operations and financial results. Such impact could give rise to unanticipated capital needs that we may not be able to meet and/or result in our inability to service our existing debt or comply with the covenants therein. Our

(D)F-9


inability to comply with such covenants could result in the amounts outstanding under our debt to become immediately due and we might not be able to meet such payment obligations.

As mitigating plans, management has had discussions with lenders and with the Company’s majority shareholder on additional financing options and actions to improve the capital structure of the Company. In addition, management believes it has the ability to pursue cost reduction initiatives in order to further improve the Company’s financial performance and benefit the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility. While management believes that each of these actions is reasonably possible of occurring if necessary and could alleviate the substantial doubt, none of these actions has been executed at the time of the filing of the Company’s financial statements and therefore cannot be considered as mitigating events under the accounting guidance.

(E) Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements which affect revenues and expenses during the period reported. Estimates are adjusted when necessary to reflect actual experience. Significant estimates and assumptions may affect many items in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions in amounts that may be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements include accounts receivable allowances, customer returns, the realizability of inventory, reserves for contingencies, useful lives and impairments of long-lived tangible and intangible assets, and accounting for income taxes and related uncertain tax positions, and valuation of share-based compensation, among others.

(E)(F) Cash and cash equivalents: equivalentsAll demand deposits and highly liquid short-term deposits with original maturities of three months or less maintained under cash management activities are considered cash equivalents. The effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents was not significant for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, or fiscal 2011.

(F)(G) Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit RiskWe maintainThe Company maintains an allowance for accounts receivable estimated to be uncollectible. The activity in this allowance for continuing operations is summarized as follows (in thousands).

   2013  2012  2011 

Balance, beginning of year

  $279   $450   $244  

Provisions for bad debt expense

   249    314    319  

Bad debts written off

   (175  (485  (113
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $353   $279   $450  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The provision for bad debts is included in selling, general and administrative expense. Substantially all of ourthe Company’s trade receivables are derived from sales to retailers and are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. We performThe Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of ourits wholesale partners’ financial condition and requirerequires collateral as deemed necessary. The past due status of a receivable is based on its contractual terms. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when we believeit is probable the receivable will not be collected.

Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances forincluding expected future chargebacks and margin support from wholesale partners.partners and estimated margin support. It is the nature of the apparel and fashion industry that suppliers like ussimilar to the Company face significant pressure from customers in the retail industry to provide allowances to compensate for wholesale partner margin shortfalls. This pressure often takes the form of customers requiring usthe Company to provide price concessions on prior shipments as a prerequisite for obtaining future orders. Pressure for these concessions is largely determined by overall retail sales performance and, more specifically, the performance of ourthe Company’s products at retail. To the extent ourthe Company’s wholesale partners have more of ourthe Company’s goods on hand at the end of the season, there will be greater pressure for usthe Company to grant markdown concessions on prior shipments. Our accountsAccounts receivable balances are reported net of expected allowances for these matters based on the historical level of concessions required and our estimates of the level of markdowns and allowances that will be required in the coming season in order to collect the receivables. We evaluateseason. The Company evaluates the allowance balances on a continual basis and adjustadjusts them as necessary to reflect changes in anticipated allowance activity. WeThe Company also provideprovides an allowance for sales returns based on known trends and historical return rates.

In fiscal 2013,2016, sales to three wholesale partners each accounted for more than ten percent of ourthe Company’s net sales from continuing operations.sales. These sales represented 19.8%19.6%, 12.8%14.4% and 12.8%10.8% of fiscal 20132016 net sales. In fiscal 2012,2015, sales to three wholesale partners each accounted for more than ten percent of ourthe Company’s net sales from continuing operations.sales. These sales represented 21.4%18.3%, 15.5%13.8% and 14.3%10.8% of fiscal 20122015 net sales. In fiscal 2011,2014, sales to three wholesale partners each accounted for more than ten percent of ourthe Company’s net sales from continuing operations.sales. These sales represented 15.1%23.2%, 14.9%13.2% and 13.9%12.3% of fiscal 20112014 net sales.

In fiscal 2013 accounts receivable from threeThree wholesale partners accounted for moreeach represented greater than ten percent of ourthe Company’s gross accounts receivable in continuing operations. These receivables represented 25.7%, 24.8% and 13.4%balance as of fiscal 2013 gross accounts receivable. In fiscal 2012, accounts receivable from threeJanuary 28, 2017, with a corresponding aggregate total of 57.5% of such balance. Three wholesale partners accounted for moreeach represented greater than ten percent of ourthe Company’s gross accounts receivable in continuing operations. These receivables represented 21.4%, 13.5% and 13.5%as of fiscal 2012 gross accounts receivable.

January 30, 2016, with a corresponding aggregate total of 51.8% of such balance.

(G)(H) Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. The cost of inventory includes manufacturing or purchase cost as well as sourcing, transportation, duty and other processing costs associated with acquiring, importing and preparing inventory for sale. Inventory costs are included in cost of products sold at the time of their sale. Product development costs are expensed in selling, general and administrative expense when incurred. Inventory values are reduced to net realizable value when there are factors indicating that certain inventories will not be sold on terms sufficient to recover their cost.

F-10


Inventories of continuing operations consistconsisted of the following (in thousands).following:

 

   February 1,
2014
   February 2,
2013
 

Finished goods

  $32,946    $18,443  

Work in process

   98     229  

Raw materials

   912     215  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories

  $33,956    $18,887  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net of reserves of:

  $3,929    $1,247  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Finished goods

 

$

40,771

 

 

$

49,837

 

Less: reserves

 

 

(2,242

)

 

 

(13,261

)

Total inventories, net

 

$

38,529

 

 

$

36,576

 

(H)

As of January 30, 2016, the reserve included a provision to reduce the carrying value of certain excess inventory and aged product to estimated net realizable value, as during fiscal 2015 the Company recorded a net charge of $10,300 associated with inventory that no longer supported the Company's prospective brand positioning strategy.

(I) Property Plant and Equipment: Property plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 3three to 10seven years for furniture, fixtures, and computer equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortizeddepreciated on the straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the remaining lease term, excluding renewal terms. Capitalized software is amortizeddepreciated on the straight-line basis over the estimated economic useful life of the software, generally three to fiveseven years. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to earnings while expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized. Upon the disposition of property and equipment, the accumulated depreciation is deducted from the original cost and any gain or loss is reflected in current earnings. Property and equipment consisted of the following:

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Leasehold improvements

 

$

41,214

 

 

$

38,452

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

 

12,267

 

 

 

8,236

 

Capitalized software

 

 

10,862

 

 

 

1,764

 

Construction in process

 

 

236

 

 

 

4,716

 

Total property and equipment

 

 

64,579

 

 

 

53,168

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

 

(21,634

)

 

 

(15,399

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

42,945

 

 

$

37,769

 

Depreciation expense related to continuing operations was $2,186, $1,411$7,070, $6,426 and $1,102$3,381 for fiscal 2013, 20122016, fiscal 2015 and 2011,fiscal 2014, respectively.

(I)(J) Impairment of Long-lived AssetsWe reviewThe Company reviews long-lived assets with a finite life for existence of facts and circumstances which indicate that the useful life is shorter than previously estimated or that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable from future operations based on undiscounted expected future cash flows. Impairment losses are then recognized in operating results to the extent discounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. During fiscal 2016, the Company recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $2,082 within Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, related to the impairment of certain retail stores with asset carrying values that were determined not to be recoverable and exceeded fair value. There were no significant impairment charges for continuing operations related to long-lived assets recorded in fiscal 2013,2015 and fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011.2014.

(J)(K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:Assets: Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually and in an interim period if a triggering event occurs. WeThe Company completed ourits annual impairment testing on ourits goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assetsasset during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2013,2016, fiscal 20122015 and fiscal 2011.2014. Goodwill is not allocated to the Company’s operating segments in the measure of segment assets regularly reported to and used by management, however goodwill is allocated to operating segments (goodwill reporting units) for the purpose of the annual impairment test for goodwill.

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired businesses over the fair market value of the identifiable net assets. Indefinite-livedThe indefinite-lived intangible assets are primarily company-owned trademarks. Asasset is the acquisition by Kellwood Company of the net assets of Vince occurred prior to the current requirements of ASC Topic 805Business Combinations, the additional purchase consideration paid to the former owners of Vince subsequent to the acquisition date was recorded as an addition to the purchase price, and therefore goodwill, once determined.tradename.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to theIntangibles-Goodwill and Other topic of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). Under this amendment, anAn entity may elect to perform a qualitative impairment assessment for goodwill.goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. If adverse qualitative trends are identified during the qualitative assessment that indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test is required. “Step one” of thisthe quantitative impairment test for goodwill requires thatan entity to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare such fair value to the respective carrying amount. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit be estimated and compared to its carrying amount. Ifexceeds the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset, “step two” ofnet assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired, and the

impairment test Company is performednot required to calculate the impairment loss. An impairment loss is recognized to the extentperform further testing. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, “step two” of the impliedimpairment test is performed in order to

F-11


determine the amount of the impairment loss. “Step two” of the goodwill impairment test includes valuing the tangible and intangible assets of the impaired reporting unit based on the fair value determined in “step one” and calculating the fair value of the impaired reporting unit's goodwill based upon the residual of the summed identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. The goodwill impairment test is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth, profitability and cash flows, discount rates and other variables. The Company bases its estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.  

The Company estimates the fair value of the tradename intangible asset using a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, which is based on the “relief from royalty” methodology.  This methodology assumes that in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these types of assets. The relief from royalty approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates and other variables.  The Company bases its fair value estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the tradename intangible asset is less than the carrying value.

An entity may pass on performing the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset and directly perform “step one” of the quantitative assessment. This determination can be made on an asset by asset basis, and an entity may resume performing a qualitative assessment in subsequent periods. This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this amendment during fiscal year 2012.

In fiscal 20132016, a quantitative impairment test on goodwill determined that the fair value of its Direct-to-consumer reporting unit was below its carrying value. During fiscal 2016, the sales results within the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit were impacted by continued declines in average order values as well as declines in the number of transactions due to lower conversion rates and reduced traffic and as a result, the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit has not met expectations resulting in lower current and expected future cash flows. The Company estimated the fair value of its Direct-to-consumer reporting unit using both the income and market valuation approaches, with a weighting of 80% and 20%, respectively. “Step one” of the assessment determined that the fair value of the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit was below the carrying amount by approximately 40%.  Accordingly, “step two” of the assessment was performed, which compared the implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying value of such goodwill.  Based on the results from “step two,” the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $22,311, to write-off all of the goodwill in the Direct-to-consumer reporting unit. The charge was recorded in Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we performed2016. Additionally, the results of “step one” of the assessment determined that the fair value of the Wholesale reporting unit exceeded its fair value by approximately 40% and therefore did not result in any impairment of goodwill. However, further declines in the net sales or operating results of the Wholesale reporting unit may result in a partial or full impairment of its goodwill, which amounted to $41,435 as of January 28, 2017. Significant assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis included a discount rate of 16.0%. Significant assumptions utilized in a market-based approach were market multiples ranging from 0.50x to 0.90x for the Company’s reporting units.

In fiscal 2015, the Company elected to perform a quantitative impairment test on goodwill. The results of the quantitative test did not result in any impairment of goodwill because the fair values of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values. As such, the Company was not required to perform “step two” of the impairment test. In fiscal 2014, the Company elected to perform a qualitative assessment on the goodwill and determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value of the reporting unit was greater than the fair value. In fiscal 2011, we performed “step one” of the impairment test for goodwill rather than electing early adoption of the guidance noted above due to the additional capitalized contingent purchase price. We estimated the fair value of the reporting unit based on an income approach, which uses discounted cash flow assumptions. The implied fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the book value. As such, we werethe Company was not required to perform “step two” of the impairment test.

In July 2012,fiscal 2016, a quantitative assessment of the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Intangibles—GoodwillCompany’s indefinite-lived intangible asset, which consists of the Vince tradename, determined that the fair value of its tradename intangible asset was below its carrying value. During fiscal 2016, the Company’s sales results have not met expectations resulting in lower current and Other (Topic 350):Testing Indefinite Lived Assetsexpected future cash flows. The Company estimated the fair value of its tradename intangible asset using a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, which is based on the “relief from royalty” methodology and determined that the fair value of the tradename intangible asset was below the carrying amount by approximately 30%. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge for its tradename intangible asset of $30,750, which was recorded in Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). Under this amendment, an entity may elect of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. 

In fiscal 2015, the Company elected to perform a qualitativequantitative assessment on its tradename intangible assets. The results of the quantitative test did not result in any impairment assessment for indefinite-lived intangible assets similar tobecause the goodwill impairment testing guidance discussed above.

An entity may pass on performingfair value of the qualitative assessment for an indefinite-livedCompany’s tradename intangible asset and directly perform “step one” of the assessment. This determination can be made on an asset by asset basis, and an entity may resume performing a qualitative assessment in subsequent periods. The amendment is effective for annual and interim impairment tests for indefinite-lived intangible assets performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. We early adopted this amendment during fiscal 2012.

exceeded its carrying value. In fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, we2014, the Company elected to perform a qualitative assessment on indefinite-livedits tradename intangible assets and determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value of the assets exceeded the fair value. In fiscal 2011, we performed “step one” of the impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. We estimated the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets primarily based on a relief from royalty model, which uses revenue projections, royalty rates and discount rates to estimate fair value. The implied fair value of the assets exceeded the book value, as such we were not required to perform “step two” of the impairment test.

Determining the fair value of goodwill and other intangible assets is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. It is possible that estimates of future operating results could change adversely and impact the evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets and that the effect of such changes could be material.

Definite-lived intangible assets are comprised of customer relationships and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives of 20 years.

F-12


See Note 42 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for more information on the details surrounding goodwill and intangible assets.

(K)(L) Deferred Financing Costs: Deferred financing costs, such as underwriting, financial advisory, professional fees, and other similar fees are capitalized and recognized in interest expense over the contractual life of the related debt instrument using the straight-line method, as this method results in recognition of interest expense that is materially consistent with that of the effective interest method.

(L)(M) Deferred Rent and Deferred Lease Incentives: We leaseIncentives: The Company leases various office spaces, showrooms and retail stores. Many of these operating leases contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals during the original term of the lease. For these leases, we recognizethe Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease and recordrecords the difference between the amount charged to operations and amounts paid as deferred rent. Certain of ourthe Company’s retail store leases contain provisions for contingent rent, typically a percentage of retail sales once a predetermined threshold has been met. These amounts are expensed as incurred. Additionally, we receivedthe Company receives lease incentives in certain leases. These allowances have been deferred and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease as a reduction of rent expense.

(M)(N) Revenue Recognition: Sales are recognized when goods are shipped in accordance with customer orders for ourthe Company’s wholesale business, andupon receipt by the customer for the Company’s e-commerce businesses,business, and at the time of sale to the consumer for ourthe Company’s retail business. The estimated amounts of sales discounts, returns and allowances are accounted for as reductions of sales whenRevenue associated with gift cards is recognized upon redemption. For the associated sale occurs. These estimated amounts are adjusted periodically based on changes in facts and circumstances when the changes become known to us. Accrued discounts, returns and allowances are included as an offset to accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for our wholesale business. The activity in the accrued discounts, returns and allowances account for continuing operations is summarized as follows (in thousands).

   2013  2012  2011 

Balance, beginning of year

  $7,179   $4,347   $2,540  

Provision

   39,171    29,400    17,916  

Utilization

   (37,085  (26,568  (16,109
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $9,265   $7,179   $4,347  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For ourCompany’s wholesale business, amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs are not significant. Our stated terms are FOB shipping point. There is no stated obligation to customers after shipment, other than specifically set forth allowances or discounts that are accrued at the time of sale. The rights of inspection or acceptance contained in certain sales agreements are limited to whether the goods received by ourthe Company’s wholesale partners are in conformance with the order specifications.

(N)Estimated amounts of sales discounts, returns and allowances are accounted for as reductions of sales when the associated sale occurs. These estimated amounts are adjusted periodically based on changes in facts and circumstances when the changes become known. Accrued discounts, returns and allowances are included as an offset to accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Company’s wholesale business.  

(O) Cost of Products Sold: The Company’s cost of products sold and gross margins may not necessarily be comparable to that of other entities as a result of different practices in categorizing costs. The primary components of the Company’s cost of products sold are as follows:

the cost of purchased merchandise, including raw materials;

the cost of inbound transportation, including freight;

the cost of the Company’s production and sourcing departments;

other processing costs associated with acquiring and preparing the inventory for sale; and

shrink and valuation reserves.

(P) Marketing and AdvertisingWe provideThe Company provides cooperative advertising allowances to certain of ourits customers. These allowances are accounted for as reductions in sales as discussed in “Revenue Recognition” above. Production expense related to company-directed advertising is deferred until the first time at which the advertisement runs. Communication expenseAll other expenses related to company-directed advertising isare expensed as incurred. Marketing and advertising expense recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses for continuing operations was $4,858, $2,591,$8,156, $9,177 and $3,609$7,427 in fiscal 2013, 20122016, fiscal 2015 and 2011,fiscal 2014, respectively. There were not significant amounts ofAt January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, deferred production expenses associated with company-directed advertising were $182 and $416, respectively.

(Q) Share-Based Compensation: New, modified and unvested share-based payment transactions with employees, such as stock options and restricted stock units, are measured at February 1, 2014 or February 2, 2013.fair value and recognized as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period and is included as a component of Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, share-based awards granted to non-employees are expensed over the period in which the related services are rendered at their fair value, using the Black Scholes Pricing Model to determine fair value.

(O)(R) Income TaxesWe accountThe Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted rates. We determineThe Company assesses the appropriatenesslikelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and adjusts the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowances in accordance withallowance to the “moreextent the Company believes it more likely than not” recognition criteria. We recognizenot that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Many factors are considered when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including recent earnings results within taxing jurisdictions, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available and other relevant factors. Changes in the required valuation allowance are recorded in income in

F-13


the period such determination is made. The Company recognizes tax positions in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included in income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(P)(S) Earnings Per Share: Basic net incomeearnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net incomeExcept when the effect would be anti-dilutive, diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated similarly, but includes potential dilution frombased on the exercise of stock options for which future service is required as a condition to deliver the underlying stock.

(Q)New Accounting Standards:

Proposed Amendments to Current Accounting Standards

The FASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing aweighted average number of areas including, but not limited shares of common stock outstanding plus the dilutive effect of share-based awards calculated under the treasury stock method.

(T) Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to simplify the accounting for leases. goodwill impairment. The guidance removes “step two” of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance is effective for interim and annual impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company intends to early adopt this guidance on January 29, 2017.

In May 2013,November 2016, the FASB issued a new exposure draft, “Leases” (the “Exposure Draft”), which would replaceguidance that requires the existing guidancestatement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in ASC topic 840, “Leases”. Under the Exposure Draft, among other changes in practice, a lessee’s rightstotal of cash, cash equivalents, and obligations under most leases, including existingamounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and new arrangements, wouldrestricted cash equivalents should be recognized as assetsincluded with cash and liabilities, respectively,cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the balance sheet. Other significant provisionsstatement of the Exposure Draft include (i) defining the “lease term”cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 using a retrospective transition method to include the noncancellableeach period together with the periods for which therepresented. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This new guidance is not expected to have a significant economic incentive for the lessee to extend or not terminate the lease; (ii) requiring that the initial lease liability to be recordedmaterial impact on the balance sheet contemplates only those variable leaseCompany’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments that dependin the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and must be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on an indexits Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding share-based compensation, to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including accounting for forfeitures, income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or that are in substance “fixed”,liabilities and (iii) a dual approachclassification on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for determining whether lease expenseinterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. This new guidance is recognized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, depending on whether the lessee isnot expected to consume more than an insignificant portion of the leased asset’s economic benefits. The comment period for the Exposure Draft ended on September 13, 2013. The FASB is considering the feedback received and plans to redeliberate all significant issues to determine next steps. If and when effective, this proposed standard will likely have a significantmaterial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsstatements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued a new lease accounting standard, which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases currently classified as we continueoperating leases. The guidance is required to expand our direct-to-consumer segmentbe adopted retrospectively by restating all years presented in the Company’s financial statements. The guidance is effective for interim and open new stores. However, as the standard-setting process is still ongoing, theannual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is unable at this time to determinecurrently evaluating the impact of adopting this proposed changeguidance on the consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes, which requires entities to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. Currently, deferred tax assets and liabilities must be classified as current or noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheet. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The guidance may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax assets and liabilities or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company will reclassify deferred tax balances, as required.

In July 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting wouldfor inventory, which requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. This new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for cloud computing fees. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This guidance became effective for arrangements entered into, or materially modified, in interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this accounting guidance for any contracts entered into or materially modified after January 30, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance which requires management to assess whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after

F-14


the financial statements are issued. If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosures are required. This update was effective for the Company’s annual period ended January 28, 2017.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on revenue recognition accounting, which requires entities to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Since its issuance, the FASB has amended several aspects of the new guidance. In August 2015, the FASB elected to defer the effective dates for this guidance, which is now effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. The IPO and Restructuring Transactions

Initial Public Offering

On November 27, 2013, VHC completed an initial public offering of 10,000,000 shares of VHC common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share. The selling stockholders in the offering sold an additional 1,500,000 shares of VHC common stock to the underwriters in the initial public offering. Shares of the Company’s common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “VNCE”. VHC received net proceeds of $177,000, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated offering expenses from its sale of shares in the initial public offering. The Company retained approximately $5,000 of such proceeds for general corporate purposes and used the remaining net proceeds, together with net borrowings under the Term Loan Facility to repay a promissory note (“the Kellwood Note Receivable”) issued to Kellwood Company, LLC in connection with the Restructuring Transactions which occurred immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO. Proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable were used to repay or discharge certain existing debt of Kellwood Company.

In connection with the IPO noted above and the Restructuring Transactions described below, we separated the Vince and non-Vince businesses on November 27, 2013. Any and all debt obligations outstanding at the time of the transactions either remain with Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC and its subsidiaries (i.e. the non-Vince businesses) and/or were discharged, repurchased or refinanced. See information below for a summary of the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility.

Stock split

In connection with the IPO, VHC’s board of directors approved the conversion of all non-voting common stock into voting common stock on a one for one basis, and a 28.5177 for one split of its common stock. Accordingly, all references to share and per share information in all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the stock split. The par value per share of common stock was changed to $0.01 per share.

Restructuring Transactions

The following transactions were consummated as part of the Restructuring Transactions:

Affiliates of Sun Capital contributed certain indebtedness under the Sun Term Loan Agreements as a capital contribution to Vince Holding Corp., (the “Additional Sun Capital Contribution”);

Vince Holding Corp. contributed such indebtedness to Kellwood Company as a capital contribution, at which time such indebtedness was cancelled;

Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC was formed and became a direct subsidiary of Vince Holding Corp.;

Kellwood Company, LLC (which was converted from Kellwood Company in connection with the Restructuring Transactions) was contributed to Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC;

Vince Holding Corp. and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC entered into the Transfer Agreement with Kellwood Company, LLC;

Kellwood Company, LLC distributed 100% of Vince, LLC’s membership interests to Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, who issued the Kellwood Note Receivable to Kellwood Company, LLC. Proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable were used to, among other things, repay, discharge or repurchase indebtedness of Kellwood Company, LLC;

Kellwood Holding, LLC was formed by Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, through a series of steps, contributed 100% of the membership interests of Kellwood Company, LLC to Kellwood Intermediate Holding, LLC (which was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kellwood Holding, LLC);

100% of the membership interests of Kellwood Holding, LLC was distributed to the Pre-IPO Stockholders;

Revolving Credit Facility—Vince, LLC entered into a new senior secured revolving credit facility. Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) serves as administrative agent under this new facility. This revolving credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $50,000;

Term Loan Facility—Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC entered into a new $175,000 senior secured term loan credit facility with the lenders party thereto, BofA, as administrative agent, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers;

Shared Services Agreement—Vince, LLC entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood Company, LLC pursuant to which Kellwood Company, LLC provides support services to Vince, LLC in various operational areas including, among other things, distribution, logistics, information technology, accounts payable, credit and collections, and payroll and benefits;

Tax Receivable Agreement—The Company entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with its stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions (the “Pre-IPO Stockholders”). The Tax Receivable Agreement provides for payments to the Pre-IPO Stockholders in an amount equal to 85% of the aggregate reduction in taxes payable realized by the Company and its subsidiaries from the utilization of certain tax benefits (including net operating losses and tax credits generated prior to the IPO and certain section 197 intangible deductions); and

the conversion of all of our issued and outstanding non-voting common stock into common stock on a one-for-one basis and the subsequent stock split of our common stock on a 28.5177 for one basis, at which time Apparel Holding Corp. became Vince Holding Corp.

As a result of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the non-Vince businesses were separated from the Vince business, and the Pre-IPO Stockholders (through their ownership of Kellwood Holding, LLC) retained the full ownership and control of the non-Vince businesses. The Vince business is now the sole operating business of

Vince Holding Corp., with the Pre-IPO stockholders retaining approximately a 68% ownership (calculated immediately after consummation of the IPO).

Immediately after the consummation of the IPO and as described below, Vince Holding Corp. contributed the net proceeds from the IPO to Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC. Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC used such proceeds, less approximately $5,000 retained for general corporate purposes, and approximately $169,500 of net borrowings under its Term Loan Facility to immediately repay the Kellwood Note Receivable. There was no outstanding balance on the Kellwood Note Receivable after giving effect to such repayment. Proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable were used to (i) repay, discharge or repurchase indebtedness of Kellwood Company, LLC in connection with the closing of the IPO (including approximately $9,100 of accrued and unpaid interest on such indebtedness), and (ii) pay (A) the restructuring fee payable to Sun Capital Management and (B) the debt recovery bonus payable to our Chief Executive Officer, all after giving effect to the Additional Sun Capital Contribution. The Kellwood Note Receivable did not include amounts outstanding under the Wells Fargo Facility. Kellwood Company, LLC refinanced the Wells Fargo Facility in connection with the consummation of the IPO. Neither Vince Holding Corp. nor Vince, LLC guarantee or are a borrower party to the refinanced credit facility.

Kellwood Company, LLC used the proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable to, after giving effect to the Additional Sun Capital Contribution, (i) repay, at closing, all indebtedness outstanding under (A) the Cerberus Term Loan and (B) the Sun Term Loan Agreements, (ii) redeem at par all of the 12.875% Notes, pursuant to an unconditional redemption notice issued at the closing of the IPO, plus, with respect to clauses (i) and (ii), fees, expenses and accrued and unpaid interest thereon, (iii) pay a restructuring fee equal to $3,300 to Sun Capital Management pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, and (iv) pay a debt recovery bonus to our Chief Executive Officer.

In addition, Kellwood Company conducted a tender offer for all of its outstanding 7.625% Notes, at par plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, using proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and as an early settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) approximately $33,474 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. On December 12, 2013, as part of the final settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) an additional $4,670 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. After giving effect to these settlements, approximately $48,808 of the 7.625% Notes remain issued and outstanding; provided, that neither VHC, nor Vince Intermediate nor Vince, LLC are a guarantor or obligor of such notes.

In addition, Kellwood Company, LLC refinanced the Wells Fargo Facility, to among other things, remove Vince, LLC as an obligor thereunder.

After completion of these various transactions (including the Additional Sun Capital Contribution) and payments and application of the net proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable, Vince, LLC’s obligations under the Wells Fargo Facility, the Cerberus Term Loan, the Sun Term Loan Agreements and the 12.875% Notes were terminated or discharged. Neither VHC, nor Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC nor Vince, LLC is a guarantor or obligor of the 7.625% Notes or the refinanced Wells Fargo Facility. Thereafter, VHC is not responsible for the obligations described above and the only outstanding obligations of Vince Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries immediately after the consummation of the IPO is $175,000 outstanding under our new Term Loan Facility.

Note 3. Discontinued Operations

On November 27, 2013, in connection with the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, we separated the Vince and non-Vince businesses whereby the non-Vince business is now owned by Kellwood Holding, LLC, of which 100% of the membership interests are owned by the Pre-IPO Stockholders. In connection with the Restructuring

Transactions, the Company issued the Kellwood Note Receivable to Kellwood Company, LLC, in the amount of $341,500, which was immediately repaid with proceeds from the IPO and new term loan facility. There was no remaining balance on the Kellwood Note Receivable after such repayment. Proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable were used by Kellwood to (i) repay, discharge or repurchase indebtedness of Kellwood Company, LLC (including approximately $9,100 of accrued and unpaid interest on such indebtedness), and (ii) pay (A) the restructuring fee payable to Sun Capital Management and (B) the debt recovery bonus payable to our Chief Executive Officer.

As the Company and Kellwood Holding, LLC are under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital, this separation transaction resulted in a $73,081 adjustment to additional paid in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 1, 2014.

As a result of the separation with the non-Vince businesses, the financial results of the non-Vince businesses through the separation date of November 27, 2013, are now included in results from discontinued operations. The non-Vince businesses continue to operate as a stand-alone company. Due to differences in the basis of presentation for discontinued operations and the basis of presentation as a stand-alone company, the financial results of the non-Vince businesses included within discontinued operations of the Company may not be indicative of actual financial results of the non-Vince businesses as a stand-alone company.

On November 27, 2013, we entered into a Shared Services agreement with Kellwood pursuant to which Kellwood provides support services in various operational areas as further discussed in Note 15. Other than the payments for services provided under this agreement, we do not expect any future cash flows related to the non-Vince business.

The results of the non-Vince businesses included in discontinued operations (through the separation of the non-Vince businesses on November 27, 2013) for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 are summarized in the following table (in thousands).

   Fiscal Year 
   2013  2012  2011 

Net sales

  $400,848   $514,806   $550,790  

Cost of products sold

   313,620    409,763    446,494  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   87,228    105,043    104,296  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   98,016    132,871    141,248  

Restructuring, environmental and other charges

   1,628    5,732    3,139  

Impairment of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill)

   1,399    6,497    8,418  

Impairment of goodwill

   —      —      11,046  

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,473    (7,162  (1,578

Interest expense, net

   46,677    55,316    46,256  

Other expense (income), net

   498    (9,776  1,448  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   (62,463  (78,435  (105,681

Income taxes

   (11,648  (421  263  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

  $(50,815 $(78,014 $(105,944
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

   18.6  0.5  (0.2)% 

The fiscal 2013 effective tax rate for discontinued operations differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the release of valuation allowance. The release in valuation allowance is primarily due to the allocation of the disallowed tax loss on the sale of a trademark to intangible assets with indefinite lives resulting in fewer deferred tax liabilities that cannot be offset against deferred tax assets for valuation allowance purposes.

The fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 effective tax rates for discontinued operations differ from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to a full valuation allowance on current year deferred tax assets offset in part by state taxes.

At February 1, 2014, there are no remaining assets or liabilities of the non-Vince businesses reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. At February 2, 2013, the major components of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

   February 2, 2013 

Current assets

  

Cash

  $1,564  

Receivables, net

   77,918  

Inventories, net

   56,698  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   5,177  
  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   141,357  

Property, net

   11,016  

Goodwill

   2,130  

Other intangible assets, net

   38,895  

Other assets

   7,434  
  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $200,832  
  

 

 

 

Current liabilities

  

Short-term borrowings

  $79,783  

Accounts payable

   53,682  

Other current liabilities

   25,676  
  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   159,141  

Long-term debt

   370,318  

Deferred income taxes

   1,946  

Other liabilities

   35,089  
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $566,494  
  

 

 

 

Financing arrangements of the non-Vince business

Short-term borrowings represent borrowings under the Credit Agreement (as defined herein), as amended. On October 19, 2011 Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as agent, and lenders from time to time. The Credit Agreement provided a non-amortizing senior revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of $160,000, of which $5,000 was permanently extinguished during fiscal 2012. The amount which the borrowers could borrow was determined on the basis of a borrowing base formula, and borrowings were secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of the borrowers, including the assets of Vince, LLC. Borrowings bore interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin (generally 1.25%-1.75% per annum at the borrowers’ election, LIBOR or a Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement)). On November 27, 2013, in connection with the consummation of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the Credit Agreement was amended and restated in accordance with its terms. After such amendment and restatement, neither VHC nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

Long-term debt, net of applicable discounts or premiums, consisted of the following at February 2, 2013 (in thousands):

   February 2,
2013
 

Cerberus Term Loan Agreement

  $45,431  

Sun Term Loan Agreements

   107,244  

12.875% 2009 Debentures due December 31, 2014

   139,378  

7.625% 1997 Debentures due October 15, 2017

   78,054  

3.5% 2004 Convertible Debentures due June 15, 2034

   211  
  

 

 

 

Total long-term debt of discontinued operations

  $370,318  
  

 

 

 

Cerberus Term Loan

On October 19, 2011, Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers (the “Cerberus Borrowers”), entered into a term loan agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”), as amended, with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (the “Agent”), as agent and the lenders from time to time party thereto. The Term Loan Agreement provided the Cerberus Borrowers with a non-amortizing secured Cerberus Term Loan in an aggregate amount of $55,000 (the “Cerberus Term Loan”), of which $10,000 was repaid during fiscal 2012. All borrowings under the Cerberus Term Loan bore interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin (10.25%-11.25% per annum for LIBOR Rate Loans (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) and 7.75%-8.75% for Reference Rate Loans (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement)) plus, at the Cerberus Borrowers’ election, LIBOR or a Reference Rate as defined in the Term Loan Agreement. The agreement also provided for a portion of such interest equal to 1% per annum to be paid-in-kind and added to the principal amount of such term loans. The Cerberus Term Loan was secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Cerberus Borrowers, including Vince, LLC. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the Cerberus Term Loan was repaid with the proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable, as such neither VHC nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

Sun Term Loan Agreements

Since fiscal year 2009, Kellwood Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers (the “Sun Term Loan Borrowers”), entered into various term loan agreements (“Sun Term Loan Agreements”) with affiliates of Sun Capital, as lenders, and Sun Kellwood Finance, as collateral agent. The Sun Term Loan Agreements were secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Sun Term Loan Borrowers, which included the assets of Vince, LLC, which security interest was contractually subordinated to the security interests of the lenders under the Credit Agreement and the Cerberus Term Loan. These term loans bore interest at a rate per annum of 5.0%-6.0% paid-in-kind and added to the principal amounts of such term loans. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the Sun Term Loan Agreements were discharged through (i) the application of the Kellwood Note Receivable proceeds and (ii) capital contributions by Sun Capital affiliates, as such neither VHC nor any of its subsidiaries have any obligations thereunder.

12.875% Notes

Interest on the 12.875% 2009 Debentures due December 31, 2014 of Kellwood Company (the “12.875% Notes”) was paid (a) in cash at a rate of 7.875% per annum payable in January and July; and (b) in the form of PIK interest at a rate of 5.0% per annum (“PIK Interest”) payable either by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding 12.875% Notes, or by issuing additional 12.875% Notes with a principal amount equal to the PIK Interest accrued for the interest period. The 12.875% Notes were guaranteed by various of Kellwood Company’s subsidiaries on a secured basis (including the assets of Vince, LLC), which security interest was contractually subordinated to security interests of lenders under the Credit Agreement, the Cerberus Term Loan and the Sun

Term Loan Agreements. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, the 12.875% Notes were redeemed with proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable, at which time VHC and all subsidiaries were released as a guarantor and the obligations under the indenture were satisfied and discharged.

7.625% Notes

Interest on the 7.625% 1997 Debentures due October 15, 2017 of Kellwood Company (the “7.625% Notes”) is payable in cash at a rate of 7.625% per annum in April and October. On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and as an early settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) approximately $33,474 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. On December 12, 2013, as part of the final settlement of the tender offer, Kellwood Company, LLC accepted for purchase (and cancelled) an additional $4,670 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.625% Notes. After giving effect to these settlements, approximately $48,809 of the 7.625% Notes remain issued and outstanding; provided, that neither VHC nor its subsidiaries are a guarantor or obligor of such notes.

Note 4.2. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

GoodwillNet goodwill balances and changes therein subsequent to theby segment were as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Wholesale

 

 

Direct-to-consumer

 

 

Total Net Goodwill

 

Balance as of January 31, 2015

 

$

41,435

 

 

$

22,311

 

 

$

63,746

 

Balance as of January 30, 2016

 

 

41,435

 

 

 

22,311

 

 

 

63,746

 

Impairment charge

 

 

 

 

 

(22,311

)

 

 

(22,311

)

Balance as of January 28, 2017

 

$

41,435

 

 

$

 

 

$

41,435

 

The total carrying amount of goodwill was net of accumulated impairments of $69,253, $46,942 and $46,942 as of January 28, 2012 Consolidated Balance Sheet are2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a $22,311 goodwill impairment charge as follows (in thousands).a result of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional details. There were no impairments recorded as a result of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test performed during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.

The following tables present a summary of identifiable intangible assets:

 

   Gross Goodwill   Accumulated
Impairment
  Net Goodwill 

Balance as of January 28, 2012

  $110,688    $(46,942 $63,746  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of February 2, 2013

  $110,688    $(46,942 $63,746  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of February 1, 2014

  $110,688    $(46,942 $63,746  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Impairment Charge

 

 

Net Book Value

 

Balance as of January 28, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

11,970

 

 

$

(5,372

)

 

$

 

 

$

6,598

 

Indefinite-lived intangible asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tradename

 

 

101,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

(30,750

)

 

 

71,100

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

113,820

 

 

$

(5,372

)

 

$

(30,750

)

 

$

77,698

 

Identifiable

(in thousands)

 

Gross Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Book Value

 

Balance as of January 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

11,970

 

 

$

(4,774

)

 

$

7,196

 

Indefinite-lived intangible asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tradename

 

 

101,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

101,850

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

113,820

 

 

$

(4,774

)

 

$

109,046

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a $30,750 impairment charge as a result of the Company’s quantitative assessment on its tradename intangible assets summary (in thousands):asset. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional details. No impairments of the Vince tradename were recorded as a result of the Company’s annual asset impairment tests performed during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.

F-15

   Gross Amount   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Book
Value
 

Balance as of February 2, 2013:

     

Amortizable intangible assets:

     

Customer relationships

  $11,970    $(2,978 $8,992  

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

     

Trademark

   101,850     —      101,850  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $113,820    $(2,978 $110,842  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Gross Amount   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Book
Value
 

Balance as of February 1, 2014

     

Amortizable intangible assets:

     

Customer relationships

  $11,970    $(3,577 $8,393  

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

     

Trademark

   101,850     —      101,850  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $113,820    $(3,577 $110,243  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amortization of identifiable intangible assets was $599,$598, $598 and $599 for fiscal 2013, 20122016, fiscal 2015 and 2011,fiscal 2014, respectively, which is included in selling,Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization expense for each of the fiscal years 20142017 to 20182021 is expected to be as follows (in thousands).follows:

 

 

Future

 

  Future
Amortization
 

2014

  $598  

2015

   598  

2016

   598  

(in thousands)

 

Amortization

 

2017

   598  

 

$

598

 

2018

   598  

 

 

598

 

  

 

 

2019

 

 

598

 

2020

 

 

598

 

2021

 

 

598

 

Total next 5 fiscal years

  $2,990  

 

$

2,990

 

  

 

 

Identifiable indefinite-lived intangible assets represent the Vince trademark. No impairments of the Vince trademark were recorded as a result of our annual asset impairment tests during fiscal years 2013, 2012 or 2011. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, we performed the qualitative assessment on the Vince Trademark as allowed by the Intangible—Goodwill and Other Topic of ASC and determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value exceeded the fair value of the asset. In fiscal 2011 the fair value of the trademark was determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method calculates fair value using a royalty savings method, which measures the value by estimating cost savings. Key assumptions include revenue projections, royalty rates and discount rates for the business.

Additionally, there were no impairments recorded as a result of our annual goodwill impairment test during fiscal 2013, 2012 or 2011. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, we used a qualitative analysis to assess the goodwill and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value, as allowed by theIntangible—Goodwill and Other Topic of ASC. In fiscal 2011, we utilized an income approach to estimate the fair value of Vince and no impairment to goodwill was recorded as a result.

In connection with the Kellwood Company acquisition of certain net assets from CRL Group, LLC in 2006, owner of the Vince® brand and trademark, additional cash purchase consideration was paid based upon achievement of certain specified financial performance targets for each of the five full years after the acquisition (2007 through 2011) and the cumulative performance from 2007 to 2011. The additional consideration earned in fiscal 2011 was $51,134. We paid $50,328 of the fiscal 2011 consideration during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and paid the remaining consideration during the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The fiscal 2010 additional cash consideration was paid during first quarter of fiscal 2011.

Note 5.3. Fair Value Measurements

ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This guidance outlines a valuation framework, creates a fair value hierarchy to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are to be measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

 

Level 1—

quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2—

observable market-based inputs (quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active) or inputs that are corroborated by observable market data

Level 3—

significant unobservable inputs that reflect ourthe Company’s assumptions and are not substantially supported by market data

The Company did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis at February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 or February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. At February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 and February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, the Company believes that the carrying valuevalues of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximatesapproximate fair value, due to the shortshort-term maturity of these instruments. As theinstruments and would be measured using Level 1 inputs. The Company’s debt obligationobligations as of February 1, 2014 isJanuary 28, 2017 are at variable interest rates there is no significant difference betweenand management estimates that the fair value and carrying value of the Company’s debt.outstanding debt obligations was approximately $48,000 based upon quoted prices in markets that are not active, which is considered a Level 2 input.

The Company’s non-financial assets, which primarily consist of goodwill, intangible assets, and property and equipment, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are reported at their carrying value.values. However, on a periodic basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be fully recoverable (and at least annually for goodwill and intangible assets), non-financial assets are assessed for impairment, and if applicable, written down to (and recorded at) fair value.

The following table presents the non-financial assets the Company measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in fiscal 2016, based on such fair value hierarchy:

 

 

Net Carrying

Value as of

 

 

Fair Value Measured and Recorded at Reporting Date Using:

 

 

Total Losses - Year Ended

 

 

(in thousands)

 

January 28, 2017

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

January 28, 2017

 

 

Property and equipment

 

$

1,042

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,042

 

 

$

2,082

 

(1)

Goodwill

 

 

41,435

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,435

 

 

 

22,311

 

(2)

Tradename

 

 

71,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71,100

 

 

 

30,750

 

(2)

(1) Recorded within Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 6.1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (I) Property and Equipment” for additional information.

(2) Recorded within Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional details.

F-16


Note 4. Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Term Loan Facility

 

$

45,000

 

 

$

45,000

 

Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

5,200

 

 

 

15,000

 

Total long-term debt principal

 

 

50,200

 

 

 

60,000

 

Less: Deferred financing costs

 

 

1,902

 

 

 

2,385

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

48,298

 

 

$

57,615

 

Term Loan Facility

On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC, a direct subsidiary of VHC and the direct parent company of Vince, LLC (“Vince Intermediate”), entered into a $175,000 senior secured term loan facility (as amended from time to time, the “Term Loan Facility”) with the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as administrative agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers, and Cantor Fitzgerald as documentation agent. The Term Loan Facility will mature on November 27, 2019. Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate are borrowers and VHC is a guarantor under the Term Loan Facility.

The Term Loan Facility also provides for an incremental facility of up to the greater of $50,000 and an amount that would result in the consolidated net total secured leverage ratio not exceeding 3.00 to 1.00, in addition to certain other rights to refinance or repurchase portions of the term loan. The Term Loan Facility is subject to quarterly amortization of principal equal to 0.25% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan Facility (adjusted to reflect any prepayments), with the balance payable at final maturity. Interest is payable on loans under the Term Loan Facility at a rate of either (i) the Eurodollar rate (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus an applicable margin of 4.75% to 5.00% based on a consolidated net total leverage ratio or (ii) the base rate applicable margin of 3.75% to 4.00% based on a consolidated net total leverage ratio. During the continuance of a payment or bankruptcy event of default, interest will accrue (i) on the overdue principal amount of any loan at a rate of 2% in excess of the rate otherwise applicable to such loan and (ii) on any overdue interest or any other outstanding overdue amount at a rate of 2% in excess of the non-default interest rate then applicable to base rate loans. The Term Loan Facility requires Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate to make mandatory prepayments upon the occurrence of certain events, including additional debt issuances, common and preferred stock issuances, certain asset sales, and annual payments of 50% of excess cash flow, subject to reductions to 25% and 0% if Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate maintain a Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio of 2.50 to 1.00 and 2.00 to 1.00, respectively, and subject to reductions for voluntary prepayments made during such fiscal year.

The Term Loan Facility contains a requirement that Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate maintain a “Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio” as of the last day of any period of four fiscal quarters not to exceed 3.25 to 1.00. The Term Loan Facility permits Vince Holding Corp. to make a Specified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Agreement, to the Borrowers in order to increase, dollar for dollar, Consolidated EBITDA for such fiscal quarter for the purposes of determining compliance with this covenant at the end of such fiscal quarter and applicable subsequent periods provided that (a) in each four fiscal quarter period there shall be at least two fiscal quarters in which no Specified Equity Contribution is made; (b) no more than five Specified Equity Contributions shall be made in the aggregate during the term of the Agreement; and (c) the amount of any Specified Equity Contribution shall be no greater than the amount required to cause the Company to be in compliance with this covenant.

In addition, the Term Loan Facility contains customary representations and warranties, other covenants, and events of default, including but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, prepayment of other debt, the repurchase of capital stock, transactions with affiliates, and the ability to change the nature of the Company’s business or its fiscal year, and distributions and dividends. The Term Loan Facility generally permits dividends to the extent that no default or event of default is continuing or would result from the contemplated dividend and the pro forma Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio after giving effect to such contemplated dividend is at least 0.25 lower than the maximum Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio for such quarter in an amount not to exceed the excess available amount, as defined in the loan agreement. All obligations under the Term Loan Facility are guaranteed by VHC and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries of Vince, LLC and secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of VHC, Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries. As of January 28, 2017, the Company was in compliance with applicable financial covenants. During April 2017, the Company utilized $6,241 of the funds held by VHC to make a Specified Equity Contribution, as defined under the Term Loan Facility, in connection with the calculation of the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio under the Term Loan Facility as of January 28, 2017 so that the Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio would not exceed 3.25 to 1.00.

F-17


Through January 28, 2017, on an inception to date basis, the Company has made voluntary prepayments totaling $130,000 in the aggregate on the original $175,000 Term Loan Facility entered into on November 27, 2013, with no such prepayments made during fiscal 2016. As of January 28, 2017, the Company had $45,000 of debt outstanding under the Term Loan Facility.

Revolving Credit Facility

On November 27, 2013, Vince, LLC entered into a new$50,000 senior secured revolving credit facility in connection(as amended from time to time, the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with the closing of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions. Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) servesBofA as administrative agent for this new facility. Theagent. Vince, LLC is the borrower and VHC and Vince Intermediate are the guarantors under the Revolving Credit Facility. On June 3, 2015, Vince LLC entered into a first amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility, provides forthat among other things, increased the aggregate commitments under the facility from $50,000 to $80,000, subject to a revolving lineloan cap which is the lesser of credit of up to $50,000(i) the Borrowing Base, as defined in the loan agreement, (ii) the aggregate commitments, or (iii) $70,000 until debt obligations under the Company’s term loan facility have been paid in full, and matures onextended the maturity date from November 27, 2018.2018 to June 3, 2020.  The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for a letter of credit sublimit of $25,000 (plus any increase in aggregate commitments) and an accordion option that allows for an increase in aggregate commitments of up to $20,000. Vince, LLC is the borrower and VHC and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC (“Vince Intermediate”) are the guarantors under the new revolving credit facility. Interest is payable on the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility at either the LIBOR or the Base Rate, in each case, withplus an applicable marginsmargin of 1.25% to 1.75% for LIBOR loans or 0.25% to 0.75% for Base Rate loans, and in each case subject to a pricing grid based on an average daily excess availability calculation. The “Base Rate” means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by BofA as its prime rate; (ii) the Federal Funds Rate for such day, plus 0.50%; and (iii) the LIBOR Rate for a one month interest period as determined on such day, plus 1.0%. During the continuance of an event of default and at the election of the required lender, interest will accrue at a rate of 2% in excess of the applicable non-default rate.

The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility contains a requirementcovenant that, at any point when “Excess Availability” is less than the greater of (i) 15% percentof an adjusted loan cap (without giving effect to item (iii) of the loan cap described above) or (ii) $7,500,$10,000, and continuing until Excess Availability exceeds the greater of such amounts for 30 consecutive days, during which time, Vince, LLC must maintain a consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the related credit agreement)Revolving Credit Facility) equal to or greater than $20,000.$20,000 measured at the end of each applicable fiscal month for the trailing twelve-month period. As of January 28, 2017, the Company was not subject to this covenant as Excess Availability was greater than the required minimum. Additionally, in order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into a side letter (the “Letter”) with BofA, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility which temporarily modified the covenant discussed above. The Letter provided that during the period from March 6, 2017 until and through April 30, 2017, the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” under the Revolving Credit Facility were temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. On April 14, 2017, Vince, LLC and BofA amended and restated the Letter in its entirety (the “Amended Letter”). The Amended Letter provides that during the period from April 13, 2017 until and through July 31, 2017 (the “Letter Period”), the respective thresholds included in the definitions of “Covenant Compliance Event” and “Trigger Event” in the Revolving Credit Facility continue to be temporarily modified to be the greater of (a) 12.5% of the Adjusted Loan Cap (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) and (b) $5,000. The Amended Letter further provides that during the Letter Period, so long as the Company’s cash is held in a deposit account of the Company maintained with BofA (the “BofA Account”), the Company may include in the Borrowing Base (i) up to $10,000 of such cash after April 13, 2017 through May 31, 2017 and (ii) up to $5,000 of such cash after May 31, 2017 through July 31, 2017. During the Letter Period, to the extent that the cash and cash equivalents held by the Loan Parties at the close of business on any given day exceeds $1,000 (excluding amounts in the BofA Account and certain other excluded accounts, as well as amounts equal to all undrawn checks and ACH issued in the ordinary course of business for payroll, rent and other accounts payable needs), Vince shall use any such cash in excess of $1,000 to repay the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility contains representations and warranties, other covenants and events of default that are customary for this type of financing, including limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, prepayment of other debt, the repurchase of capital stock, transactions with affiliates, and the ability to change the nature of itsthe Company’s business or its fiscal year. The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility generally permits dividends in the absence of any event of default (including any event of default arising from the contemplated dividend), so long as (i) after giving pro forma effect to the contemplated dividend, for the following six months Excess Availability will be at least the greater of 20% of the aggregate lending commitmentsadjusted loan cap and $7,500$10,000 and (ii) after giving pro forma effect to the contemplated dividend, the “Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” for the 12 months preceding such dividend shall be greater than or equal to 1.11.0 to 1.0 (provided that the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio may be less than 1.11.0 to 1.0 if, after giving pro forma effect to the contemplated dividend, Excess Availability for the six fiscal months following the dividend is at least the greater of 35% of the aggregate lending commitmentsadjusted loan cap and $10,000)$15,000).  As of January 28, 2017, the Company was in compliance with applicable financial covenants.

As of February 1, 2014, the maximum capacity onJanuary 28, 2017, $27,157 was available under the Revolving Credit Facility, was $50,000net of the amended loan cap, and there were $4,452$5,200 of borrowings outstanding and $7,474 of letters of credit outstanding. Nooutstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings have been made to date.

Note 7. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted ofoutstanding under the followingRevolving Credit Facility as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 (in thousands)January 28, 2017 was 4.3%.

F-18

   February 1,
2014
   February 2,
2013
 

Sun Promissory Notes

  $—      $319,926  

Sun Capital Loan Agreement

   —       71,508  

Term Loan Facility

   170,000     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

  $170,000    $391,434  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Term Loan Facility

On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closingAs of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions, Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate entered into a new $175,000 senior secured term loan credit facility with the lenders party thereto, BofA, as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers, and Cantor Fitzgerald as documentation agent. The new term loan facility will mature on November 27, 2019. On November 27, 2013, net proceeds from the new term loan facility were used, at closing, to repay the promissory note issued by Vince Intermediate to Kellwood Company immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO as part of the Restructuring Transactions.

The Term Loan Facility also provides for an incremental facility of up to the greater of $50,000 and an amount that would result in the consolidated net total secured leverage ratio not exceeding 3.00 to 1.00, in addition to certain other rights to refinance or repurchase portions of the term loan. The Term Loan Facility is subject to quarterly amortization of principal equal to 0.25% of the original aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility, with the balance payable at final maturity. Interest is payable on loans under the term loan facility at a rate of either (i) the Eurodollar rate (subject to a 1.00% floor) plus 5.00% or (ii) the base rate (subject to a 2.00% floor) plus 3.00%. During the continuance of a payment or bankruptcy event of default, interest will accrue (i) on the overdue principal amount of any loan at a rate of 2% in excess of the rate otherwise applicable to such loan and (ii) on any overdue interest or any other outstanding overdue amount at a rate of 2% in excess of the nondefault interest rate then applicable to base rate loans.

The Term Loan Facility contains a requirement that Vince, LLC and Vince Intermediate maintain a “Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio” as of the last day of any period of four fiscal quarters not to exceed 3.75:1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending February 1, 2014 through November 1, 2014, 3.50:1.0 for the fiscal quarters ending January 31, 2015 through October 31, 2015, and 3.25:1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending January 30, 2016, and each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, the Term Loan Facility contains customary representations and warranties, other covenants, and events of default, including but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, prepayment of other debt, the repurchase of capital stock, transactions with affiliates, and the ability to change the nature of its business or its fiscal year, and distributions and dividends. The Term Loan Facility generally permits dividends to the extent that no default or event of default is continuing or would result from the contemplated dividend and the pro forma Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio after giving effect to such contemplated dividend is at least 0.25 lower than the maximum Consolidated Net Total Leverage Ratio for such quarter. All obligations$28,127 was available under the term loan facility are guaranteed by VHC and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries of Vince, LLC and secured by a lien on substantially allRevolving Credit Facility, net of the assetsamended loan cap, and there were $15,000 of VHC, Vince, LLCborrowings outstanding and Vince Intermediate and any future material domestic restricted subsidiaries.

In January 2014$7,522 of letters of credit outstanding under the Company made a voluntary pre-payment of $5,000 on the Term LoanRevolving Credit Facility. As of February 1, 2014 the Company had $170,000 of debt outstanding.

Sun Promissory Notes

On May 2, 2008, VHC entered into a $225,000 Senior Subordinated Promissory Note and a $75,000 Senior Subordinated Promissory Note with Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (“Sun Kellwood Finance”), an affiliate of Sun Capital Partners, Inc.. We collectively refer to these notes as our “Sun Promissory Notes”. The unpaid principal balance of the notes accrue interest at 15% per annum until the maturity date of October 15, 2011, at which point any unpaid principal balance of the notes shall accrue interest at a rate of 17% per annum until the notes are paid in full. All interest which is not paid in cash on or before the last day of each calendar month are deemed paid in kind and added to the principal balance of the notes unless an election is made otherwise.

On July 19, 2012, Vince Holding Corp. amended the Sun Promissory Notes to extend the maturity date to October 15, 2016 and reduce theweighted average interest rate to 12% per annum until maturity, at which point any unpaid principal balance of the notes shall accrue interest at a rate of 14% per annum until the notes are paid in full.

On December 28, 2012, Sun Kellwood Finance, LLC (“Sun Capital Finance”) waived all interest capitalized and accruedfor borrowings outstanding under the notes prior to July 19, 2012. As both parties were under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. (“Sun Capital”), this transaction resulted in a capital contribution of $270,852 which was recorded as an adjustment to additional paid in capital on our Consolidated Balance SheetRevolving Credit Facility as of February 2, 2013.

On June 18, 2013, Sun Kellwood Finance assigned all title and interest in the Sun Promissory Notes to Sun Cardinal, LLC (“Sun Cardinal”). Immediately following the assignment, Sun Cardinal contributed all outstanding principal and interest due under these notes as of June 18, 2013 to the capital of VHC. As both parties were under common control of affiliates of Sun Capital at such time, this transaction resulted in a capital contribution of $334,595, whichJanuary 30, 2016 was recorded as an adjustment to VHC’s additional paid in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 1, 2014.2.1%.

Sun Capital Loan Agreement

VHC was party to a Loan Authorization Agreement, originally dated February 13, 2008, by and between VHC (as the successor entity to Cardinal Integrated, LLC), SCSF Kellwood Finance, LLC (“SCSF Finance”) and Sun Kellwood Finance (as successors to Bank of Montreal) for a $72,000 line of credit, and $69,485 principal balance, which we refer to as the “Sun Capital Loan Agreement”. Under the terms of this agreement, as amended from time to time, interest accrued at a rate equal to the rate per annum announced by the Bank of Montreal, Chicago, Illinois, from time to time as its prime commercial rate, or equivalent, for U.S. dollar loans to borrowers located in the U.S. plus 2%. Interest on the loan was due by the last day of each fiscal quarter and is payable either in immediately available funds on each interest payment date or by adding such interest to the unpaid principal balance of the loan on each interest payment date. The original maturity date of the loan was August 6, 2009. On July 19, 2012, the maturity date of the loan was extended to August 6, 2014.

On December 28, 2012, Sun Kellwood Finance and SCSF Finance waived all interest capitalized and accrued under the loan authorization agreement prior to July 19, 2012. As all parties were under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital, this transaction resulted in a capital contribution of $18,249, which was recorded as an adjustment to additional paid in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2013.

On June 18, 2013, Sun Kellwood Finance and SCSF Finance assigned all title and interest in the note under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement to Sun Cardinal. Immediately following the assignment, Sun Cardinal contributed all outstanding principal and interest due under this note as of June 18, 2013 to the capital of VHC. As all parties were under common control of affiliates of Sun Capital at such time, this transaction resulted in a capital contribution of $72,932, which was recorded as an adjustment to VHC’s additional paid in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 1, 2014.

Note 8. 5. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We lease substantially all of ourThe Company leases its office, showroom space and retail stores and certain machinery and equipment under operating leases havingwhich have remaining terms up to eleventen years, excluding renewal terms. Most of ourthe Company’s real estate leases contain covenants that require usthe Company to pay real estate taxes, insurance, and other executory costs. Certain of these leases require contingent rent payments or contain kick-out clauses and/or opt-out clauses, based on the operating results of the retail operations utilizing the leased premises. Rent under leases with scheduled rent changes or lease concessions are recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rent expense under all operating leases was $10,467, $7,448$23,545, $20,015 and $5,567$16,161 for 2013, 2012fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and 2011, respectively.fiscal 2014, respectively, the majority of which is recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses.

The future minimum lease payments under operating leases at February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):follows:

 

2014

  $10,124  

2015

   11,258  

2016

   11,307  

2017

   11,108  

2018

   10,325  

Thereafter

   40,720  
  

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  $94,842  
  

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Lease

 

(in thousands)

 

Payments

 

Fiscal 2017

 

$

21,096

 

Fiscal 2018

 

 

20,918

 

Fiscal 2019

 

 

20,877

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

19,792

 

Fiscal 2021

 

 

17,355

 

Thereafter

 

 

50,753

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

150,791

 

Note 9. Share-Based Compensation

ForOther Contractual Cash Obligations

At January 28, 2017, the financial periods presented herein through November 27, 2013, Vince Holding Corp. did not have convertible equity or convertible debt securities, anyCompany’s other contractual cash obligations of which could result in share-based compensation expense.$42,294 consisted primarily of inventory purchase obligations and service contracts.

Restructuring Charges

In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, a number of senior management departures occurred. In connection with these departures, the IPO, which closed on November 27, 2013, and the separation of the Vince and non-Vince businesses, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s remainingCompany had certain obligations under the 2010 Stock Option Plan of Kellwood Company (the “2010 Option Plan”) and all Kellwood Company stock options previously issued to Vince employees under such plan became options to acquire shares of VHC common stock. Additionally, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s obligationsexisting employment arrangements with respect to the vested Kellwood Company stock options previously issued to Kellwood Company employees, which options were cancelled in exchange for shares of VHC common stock. Accordingly, option information presented below for previously issued Kellwood Company stock options under the 2010 Option Plan has been adjusted to account for the split of the Company’s common stockseverance and applicable conversion to options to acquire shares of Vince Holding Corp. common stock.

Employee Stock Plans

2010 Option Plan

Kellwood Company had convertible equity securities thatemployee related benefits. As a result, in recognition of share-based compensation expense. On June 30, 2010, the board of directors approved the 2010 Stock Option Plan. On November 21, 2013 and as discussed above, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan; provided, that none of the issued and outstanding options (after giving effect to such assumption and the stock split effected as part of the Restructuring Transactions) were exercisable until the consummation of the IPO. Additionally, prior to the consummation of the IPO and after giving effect to the assumption described in this paragraph, VHC and the Vince employees to whom options had been previously granted under the 2010 Option Plan, amended the related grant agreements to eliminate, effective as of the consummation of the IPO, restrictions on the exercisability of the subject employees vested options.

Prior to the IPO, the 2010 Option Plan, as amended, provided for the grant of options to acquire up to 2,752,155 shares of Kellwood Company common stock. The options granted pursuant to the 2010 Option Plan (i) vest in five equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the grant date, subject

to the employee’s continued employment and, (ii) expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination of employment by the company for cause. We will not grant any future awards under the 2010 Option Plan. Future awards shall be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

Vince 2013 Incentive Plan

In connection with the IPO, the Company adopted the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, which provides for grantsrecognized a charge of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued or used for reference purposes under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan or with respect to which awards may be granted may not exceed 3,400,000 shares. The shares available for issuance under the plan may be, in whole or in part, either authorized and unissued shares of our common stock or shares of common stock held in or acquired for our treasury. In general, if awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan are for any reason cancelled, or expire or terminate unexercised, the shares covered by such award may again be available for the grant of awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. As of February 1, 2014, there were 3,036,043 shares under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan available for future grants. Options granted pursuant to this plan during fiscal 2013 (i) vest in equal installments over four years or at 33 1/3% per year beginning in year two, over four years, subject to the employees’ continued employment and (ii) expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination as outlined in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

A summary of stock option activity for fiscal 2013 is as follows:

   Options  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
   Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 

Outstanding at February 2, 2013

   1,978,943   $4.09     7.0  

Granted

   1,092,991   $11.15    

Exercised

   (518,982 $0.27    

Forfeited or expired

   (263,422 $4.68    
  

 

 

    

Outstanding at February 1, 2014

   2,289,530   $8.26     8.8  
  

 

 

    

Vested or expected to vest at February 1, 2014

   2,289,530   $8.26    
  

 

 

    

Exercisable at February 1, 2014

   318,464   $5.89    
  

 

 

    

The Company’s weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value, using a Black-Scholes model, of stock options granted in connection with our initial public offering in fiscal 2013 were as follows: Expected term of 4.5 years, expected volatility of 51.1%, risk-free interest rate of 1.38% and expected dividend yield of 0.0%. This resulted in a weighted average grant date fair value of $8.82 per share.

The fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2012 through October 2013 was determined at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model, which requires us to make several significant assumptions including risk-free interest rate, volatility, expected term, and discount factors for shareholders in a privately-held company. The estimated term of 6.5 years$3,394 for these options was developed using a simplified method permitted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14:Share-Based Payment, available for companies with “plain-vanilla” options and have limited historical exercise data. Our selected volatility rate of 55.0% was estimated using both: (i) volatility reported by companies comparable to Kellwood Company with publicly-traded stock, and (ii) calculated volatility of companies comparable to Kellwood Company with publicly-traded stock using historical stock prices. We applied a cumulative discount factor to the price per share of 36.25% to adjust for the lack of marketability of the shares, as well as the impact of the shares representing a minority interest in a privately-held company. Our estimates were developed using market data for companies comparable to Kellwood Company and empirical studies regarding the impact on the value of private-company shares resulting from transfer restrictions. Finally, the risk-free rate of 0.85% is based upon the U.S. Treasury five year yield curve.

The fair value of stock options granted in fiscal 2011 was determined at the grant date using a probability-weighted expected return method model, which requires us to make several significant assumptions including long-term EBITDA growth rates, future enterprise value, discount rates, and timing and probability of a future liquidity event. This methodology was selected based on our capital structure and forecasted operational performance at the time of the valuation. Prior to 2012, our estimates of future enterprise value for Kellwood Company as compared to the value of Kellwood Company’s debt obligations precluded us from using a closed-form model (including a Black-Scholes formula) to estimate the fair value of our stock options. Due to more favorable operating results in fiscal 2012, we believe that the Black-Scholes formula provides a more refined estimate of the value of our stock options, in consideration of our current capital structure and estimates of future operating performance. A change in option-pricing model is not considered a change in accounting principle.

The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant and is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. In November 2013 the Company granted 7,500 restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $20.00 per share which will vest over three years, subject to continued service and applicable conditions of the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan.

During fiscal 2013, from our IPO through the end of the fiscal year, we recognized share-based compensation expense of $347 included in selling,departures within Selling, general, and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations during fiscal 2015. This net charge was reflected within “unallocated corporate expenses” for segment disclosures. These amounts are being paid over a period of six to eighteen months, which began in the third quarter of fiscal 2015.

The following is a reconciliation of the accrued severance and employee related benefits associated with the above charge included within total current liabilities on the Consolidated StatementBalance Sheet:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Balance at August 1, 2015

 

$

3,717

 

Cash payments

 

 

(1,557

)

Non-cash recovery

 

 

(323

)

Balance at January 30, 2016

 

 

1,837

 

Cash payments

 

 

(1,719

)

Balance at January 28, 2017

 

$

118

 

Litigation

The Company is a party to legal proceedings, compliance matters and environmental claims that arise in the ordinary course of Operations forits business. Although the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014. During fiscal 2013, fromoutcome of such items cannot be determined with certainty, management believes that the beginning ultimate outcome

F-19


of our fiscal year through our IPO in November 2013,these items, individually and in fiscal 2012 and 2011 we recognized share-based compensation expense of $551, $367 and $65, respectively, which was included in net loss from discontinued operations as such expense wasthe aggregate, will not have a component of the non-Vince businesses which were separated from the Vince business on November 27, 2013.

At February 1, 2014 there was $5,710 of unrecognized compensation costs that will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 3.8 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding as of February 1, 2014 is $34,578 and is basedmaterial adverse impact on the amount by which the market price, at the endCompany’s financial position, results of the period, of the underlying share exceeds the exercise price of the stock option.operations or cash flows.

Note 10.6. Share-Based Compensation

In connection with the IPO, which closed on November 27, 2013, and the separation of the Vince and non-Vince businesses, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Stock Option Plan of Kellwood Company (the “2010 Option Plan”) and all Kellwood Company stock options previously issued to Vince employees under such plan became options to acquire shares of VHC common stock. Additionally, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s obligations with respect to the vested Kellwood Company stock options previously issued to Kellwood Company employees, which options were cancelled in exchange for shares of VHC common stock. Accordingly, option information presented below for previously issued Kellwood Company stock options under the 2010 Option Plan has been adjusted to account for the split of the Company’s common stock and applicable conversion to options to acquire shares of VHC common stock.

Employee Stock Plans

2010 Option Plan

On June 30, 2010, the board of directors approved the 2010 Stock Option Plan. On November 21, 2013 and as discussed above, VHC assumed Kellwood Company’s remaining obligations under the 2010 Option Plan; provided, that none of the issued and outstanding options (after giving effect to such assumption and the stock split effected as part of the Restructuring Transactions) were exercisable until the consummation of the IPO. Additionally, prior to the consummation of the IPO and after giving effect to the assumption described in this paragraph, VHC and the Vince employees to whom options had been previously granted under the 2010 Option Plan, amended the related grant agreements to eliminate, effective as of the consummation of the IPO, restrictions on the exercisability of the subject employees vested options.

Prior to the IPO, the 2010 Option Plan, as amended, provided for the grant of options to acquire up to 2,752,155 shares of Kellwood Company common stock. The options granted pursuant to the 2010 Option Plan (i) vested in five equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the employee’s continued employment and, (ii) expired on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination of employment. The Company will not grant any future awards under the 2010 Option Plan. Future awards will be granted under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan described further below. As of January 28, 2017, there are no options outstanding under the 2010 Stock Option Plan.

Vince 2013 Incentive Plan

In connection with the IPO, the Company adopted the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan, which provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued or used for reference purposes under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan or with respect to which awards may be granted may not exceed 3,400,000 shares. The shares available for issuance under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan may be, in whole or in part, either authorized and unissued shares of the Company’s common stock or shares of common stock held in or acquired for the Company’s treasury. In general, if awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan are cancelled for any reason, or expire or terminate unexercised, the shares covered by such award may again be available for the grant of awards under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. As of January 28, 2017, there were 1,010,308 shares under the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan available for future grants. Options granted pursuant to the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan (i) vest in equal installments over two, three or four years or at 33 1/3% per year beginning in year two, over four years, subject to the employees’ continued employment and (ii) expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination as outlined in the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. Options granted to non-employee consultants vest 50% after one year, 25% after 18 months and 25% after two years and expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of the grant date or upon termination as outlined in their grant agreements pursuant to the Vince 2013 Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units granted vest in equal installments over a three year period or vest in equal installments over four years, subject to the employee’s continued employment.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company maintains an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) for its employees. Under the ESPP, all eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of their base compensation, up to a maximum contribution of $10 per year. The purchase price of the stock is 90% of the fair market value, with purchases executed on a quarterly basis. The plan is defined as compensatory, and accordingly, a charge for compensation expense is recorded to Selling, general and administrative expense for the difference between the fair market value and the discounted purchase price of the Company’s Stock. As of January 28, 2017, 7,883 shares of common stock have been issued under the ESPP.

F-20


Stock Options

A summary of stock option activity for both employees and non-employees for fiscal 2016 is as follows:

 

 

Stock Options

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)

 

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

(in thousands)

 

Outstanding at January 30, 2016

 

 

2,879,735

 

 

$

4.61

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

$

2,402

 

Granted

 

 

725,451

 

 

$

5.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(807,545

)

 

$

5.79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(538,854

)

 

$

4.75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 28, 2017

 

 

2,258,787

 

 

$

4.53

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017

 

 

605,937

 

 

$

4.24

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

$

 

Of the above outstanding shares, 1,414,972 are vested or expected to vest.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal 2016 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of such in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all options holders exercised their options on January 28, 2017. This amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 (based on the differences between the Company’s stock price on the respective exercise date and the respective exercise price, multiplied by the number of respective options exercised) was $640, $316 and $620, respectively.

The Company’s weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 were estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. Due to the limited trading history of the Company’s common stock, the volatility and expected term assumptions used were based on averages from a peer group of publicly traded retailers. The risk-free interest rate was based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date.

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Weighted-average expected volatility

 

 

42.6

%

 

 

46.0

%

 

 

51.1

%

Expected term (in years)

 

4.2 years

 

 

4.5 years

 

 

4.5 years

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

1.4

%

Expected dividend yield

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

Based on these assumptions used, the weighted average grant date fair value for options granted to employees during fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 was $1.22 per share, $1.75 per share and $14.13 per share, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted to non-employees in fiscal 2015 was $1.45 per share.

At January 28, 2017, there was $2,396 of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted to employees and non-employees that will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.8 years.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of restricted stock unit activity for fiscal 2016 is as follows:

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

 

Nonvested restricted stock units at January 30, 2016

 

 

29,532

 

 

$

12.22

 

Granted

 

 

99,478

 

 

$

5.80

 

Vested

 

 

(14,580

)

 

$

13.11

 

Forfeited

 

 

(6,618

)

 

$

5.98

 

Nonvested restricted stock units at January 28, 2017

 

 

107,812

 

 

$

6.56

 

F-21


The weighted average grant date fair value for restricted stock units granted during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 was $7.27 and $30.47, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 was $191, $125 and $50, respectively.

At January 28, 2017, there was $553 of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock units that will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.7 years.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

During fiscal 2016, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $1,344, including $348 of expense related to non-employees, and a related tax benefit of $0. During fiscal 2015, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $1,259, including $160 of expense related to non-employees, and a related tax benefit of $504, including $64 of tax benefit related to non-employees. During fiscal 2014, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $1,896 and a related tax benefit of $758.

Note 7. Defined Contribution Plan

On May 1, 2015, the Company adopted the Vince Holding Corp. 401(k) Plan (“401k Plan”), which is a defined contribution plan covering all U.S.-based employees. Employees who meet certain eligibility requirements may participate in this program by contributing between 1% and 100% of annual compensation to the 401k Plan, subject to IRS limitations. The Company may make matching contributions in an amount equal to 50% of employee contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation. Prior to the adoption of the 401k Plan, employees of the Company participated in the Kellwood Company Retirement Savings Plan administered by Kellwood Holding, LLC. The annual expense incurred by the Company for defined contribution plans was $405, $426 and $344 in fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively.

Note 8. Stockholders’ Equity

WeCommon Stock

The Company currently havehas authorized for issuance 100,000,000 shares of ourits Voting Common Stock, par value of $0.01 per share. As of February 1, 2014January 28, 2017 and February 2, 2013 weJanuary 30, 2016, the Company had 36,723,72749,427,606 and 26,211,13036,779,417 shares issued and outstanding, respectively (after giving effectrespectively.

Rights Offering

On April 22, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,818,181 shares in conjunction with the completed Rights Offering and Investment Agreement. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information.

Secondary Offering of Common Stock

In July 2014, certain selling stockholders of VHC, including affiliates of Sun Capital (the “Selling Stockholders”), sold 4,975,254 shares of VHC’s common stock at a public offering price of $34.50 per share in a secondary public offering (the “Secondary Offering”). The total shares sold included 648,946 shares sold by the Selling Stockholders pursuant to the conversionexercise by the underwriters of all ourtheir option to purchase additional shares. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the Secondary Offering. Immediately following the Secondary Offering, affiliates of Sun Capital beneficially owned 54.6% of VHC’s issued and outstanding non-voting common stock into common stock on a one-for-one basis andstock. The Company incurred approximately $571 of expenses in connection with the subsequent split of our common stock on a one for 28.5177 basis, as part of the Restructuring Transactions).Secondary Offering during fiscal 2014.

We haveDividends

The Company has not paid dividends, and ourthe Company’s current ability to pay such dividends is restricted by the terms of ourits debt agreements. OurThe Company’s future dividend policy will be determined on a yearly basis and will depend on earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and certain other factors. We doThe Company does not expect to declare dividends with respect to ourits common stock in the foreseeable future.

Note 11. Earnings Per ShareF-22

The following is a reconciliation of weighted average basic shares to weighted average diluted shares outstanding:

   Fiscal Year Ended 
   February 1,
2014
   February 2,
2013
   January 28,
2012
 

Weighted-average shares—basic

   28,119,794     26,211,130     26,211,130  

Effect of dilutive equity securities

   153,131     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares—diluted

   28,272,925     26,211,130     26,211,130  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

All share information presented above and herein has been adjusted to reflect the stock split approved by VHC’s board of directors as of November 27, 2013. The fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 includes the impact of 10,000,000 shares issued by the Company on November 21, 2013. As fiscal years ended February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 included net loss, there were no dilutive securities as the impact would have been anti-dilutive.

Note 12. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for continuing operations consists of the following (in thousands):

   2013  2012  2011 

Current:

    

Domestic:

    

Federal

  $—     $—     $—    

State

   43    31    18  

Foreign

   —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current

   43    31    18  

Deferred:

    

Domestic:

    

Federal

   6,333    1,030    2,451  

State

   905    124    364  

Foreign

   (13  (7  164  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred

   7,225    1,147    2,979  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total provision for income taxes

  $7,268   $1,178   $2,997  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The sources of (loss) income for continuing operations before provision for income taxes are from the United States for all years.

Current income taxes are the amounts payable under the respective tax laws and regulations on each year’s earnings. A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:

   2013  2012  2011 

Statutory rate

   35.0  (35.0%)   (35.0%) 

State taxes, net of federal benefit

   9.5  7.4  5.8

Nondeductible interest

   18.1  84.3  73.2

Nondeductible transaction costs

   6.7  0.0  0.0

Valuation allowances

   (45.5%)   (52.7%)   (36.5%) 

Other

   (0.1%)   0.1  0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   23.7  4.1  7.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities for continuing operations consisted of the following (in thousands):

   February 1, 2014  February 2, 2013 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Depreciation and amortization

  $44,742   $3,672  

Employee related costs

   2,048    3,394  

Allowance for asset valuations

   2,454    1,495  

Accrued expenses

   1,589    1,124  

Net operating losses

   80,936    67,392  

Other

   1,067    14  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   132,836    77,091  

Less: Valuation allowances

   (1,843  (64,767
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   130,993    12,324  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

   —      (11,670

Cancellation of debt income

   (11,095  (12,142
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (11,095  (23,812
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

  $119,898   $(11,488
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Included in:

   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $4,476   $—    

Deferred income taxes and other assets

   115,422    —    

Deferred income taxes and other

   —      (11,488
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities)

  $119,898   $(11,488
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

As of February 1, 2014, various federal and state net operating losses were available for carryforward to offset future taxable income. Substantially all of these net operating losses will expire between 2029 and 2034. A full valuation allowance was placed on the U.S. net deferred tax assets in a prior year due to the fact that at the time there was not sufficient positive evidence to outweigh the existing negative evidence that we would be able to utilize these net operating loss carryforwards, primarily our combined historical pretax losses from continuing and discontinued operations. In addition, a deemed change of ownership occurred in fiscal 2008 under Section 382 of the U.S. tax code resulting in $112,258 of net operating losses, as well as certain built in losses, to be subject to an annual limitation of $0. Since the realization of these benefits is remote, the associated deferred tax assets have been written down to zero and are therefore not presented in the information included in the above summary of deferred income taxes.

Net operating losses as of February 1, 2014 presented above do not include fiscal 2013 deductions related to stock options that exceeded expenses previously recognized for financial reporting purposes since they have not yet reduced income taxes payable. The excess deduction will reduce income taxes payable and increase additional paid in capital by $2,434 when ultimately deducted in a future year.

As discussed in Note 2, we completed an IPO during fiscal 2013. The completion of the IPO and Restructuring Transactions resulted in the non-Vince businesses being separated from the Vince business. As a result, the Company determined that the full valuation allowance on the U.S. net deferred tax assets was no longer necessary. Since the IPO and Restructuring Transactions occurred between related parties and were considered one integrated transaction along with the establishment of the Tax Receivable Agreement liability, the offset of the release of the valuation allowance was recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 1, 2014 in accordance with ASC 740-20-45-11(g). The total valuation allowance on deferred tax assets for continuing operations decreased on a net basis by $62,924 in the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014 and increased by $14,834 in the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands):

   2013  2012  2011 

Beginning balance

  $9,378   $11,057   $16,296  

Increases for tax positions in current year

   3,743    2,199    1,098  

Increases for tax positions in prior years

   356    52    159  

Decreases for tax positions in prior years

   (4,186  (102  (5,500

Settlements

   (3,022  (2,105  (937

Lapse in statute of limitations

   (102  (1,723  (59

Restructuring Transactions

   (2,474  —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance

  $3,693   $9,378   $11,057  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

As of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $2,155 and $5,305 (net of tax), respectively, would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain temporary unrecognized tax benefits could fully reverse. Should this occur, our unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $1,343.

We include accrued interest and penalties on underpayments of income taxes in our income tax provision. As of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, we had interest and penalties accrued on our Consolidated Balance Sheets in the amount of $0 and $3,898, respectively. Net interest and penalty provisions (benefit) of $(232), $600 and $1,401 were recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively. Interest is computed on the difference between the tax position recognized net of any unrecognized tax benefits and the amount previously taken or expected to be taken in our tax returns.

All amounts above related to unrecognized tax benefits include continuing and discontinued operations until the separation of the Vince and non-Vince businesses on November 27, 2013, and the Vince business after such date.

With limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to examination for U.S. federal and state income tax for 2007 and prior.


Note 9. Earnings Per Share

All share information presented below and herein has been adjusted to reflect the stock split approved by VHC’s board of directors as of November 27, 2013.

The following is a reconciliation of weighted average basic shares to weighted average diluted shares outstanding:

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Weighted-average shares—basic

 

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

36,770,430

 

 

 

36,730,490

 

Effect of dilutive equity securities

 

 

 

 

 

758,797

 

 

 

1,514,416

 

Weighted-average shares—diluted

 

 

46,420,533

 

 

 

37,529,227

 

 

 

38,244,906

 

Because the Company incurred a net loss for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, weighted-average basic shares and weighted-average diluted shares outstanding are equal for this period.

For the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, 1,719,135, 732,303 and 123,959 options to purchase common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share since the related exercise prices exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock and such inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

On April 22, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,818,181 shares in conjunction with the completed Rights Offering and Investment Agreement. See Note 1 “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information.

Note 13. Commitments10. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

 

 

$

(53

)

 

$

759

 

State

 

207

 

 

 

522

 

 

 

344

 

Foreign

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current

 

282

 

 

 

469

 

 

 

1,103

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

83,323

 

 

 

2,994

 

 

 

20,416

 

State

 

10,121

 

 

 

(249

)

 

 

2,475

 

Total deferred

 

93,444

 

 

 

2,745

 

 

 

22,891

 

Total provision for income taxes

$

93,726

 

 

$

3,214

 

 

$

23,994

 

The sources of income (loss) before provision for income taxes are from the United States and Contingenciesthe Company’s French branch. The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns and income tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions.

WeF-23


Current income taxes are currently partythe amounts payable under the respective tax laws and regulations on each year’s earnings. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent the tax effects of revenues, costs and expenses, which are recognized for tax purposes in different periods from those used for financial statement purposes.

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to various legal proceedings. While management currently believesthe effective tax rate is as follows:

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Statutory federal rate

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

5.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

5.7

%

Nondeductible Tax Receivable Agreement adjustment

 

0.4

%

 

 

4.1

%

 

—%

 

Valuation allowance

 

(176.8

)%

 

 

(0.5

)%

 

 

(0.7

)%

Return to provision adjustment

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

(2.4

)%

 

—%

 

Changes in tax law

—%

 

 

 

(3.2

)%

 

—%

 

Other

—%

 

 

 

(0.8

)%

 

 

0.2

%

Total

 

(136.0

)%

 

 

38.7

%

 

 

40.2

%

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

(in thousands)

2017

 

 

2016

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

$

28,353

 

 

$

17,071

 

Employee related costs

 

2,361

 

 

 

2,163

 

Allowance for asset valuations

 

4,817

 

 

 

2,551

 

Accrued expenses

 

7,349

 

 

 

6,088

 

Net operating losses

 

83,670

 

 

 

72,465

 

Tax credits

 

812

 

 

 

812

 

Other

 

489

 

 

 

457

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

127,851

 

 

 

101,607

 

Less: valuation allowances

 

(122,860

)

 

 

(1,024

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

4,991

 

 

 

100,583

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancellation of debt income

 

(4,607

)

 

 

(6,657

)

Other

 

(384

)

 

 

(482

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(4,991

)

 

 

(7,139

)

Net deferred tax assets

$

 

 

$

93,444

 

Included in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

$

 

 

$

4,164

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

89,280

 

Net deferred tax assets

$

 

 

$

93,444

 

Net operating losses as of January 28, 2017 presented above do not include prior deductions related to stock options that exceeded expenses previously recognized for financial reporting purposes, since they have not yet reduced income taxes payable. The excess deduction will reduce income taxes payable and increase additional paid in capital by $2,350 when ultimately deducted in a future year. Net operating losses as of January 30, 2016 presented above do not include prior deductions related to stock options that exceeded expenses previously recognized for financial reporting purposes since they have not yet reduced income taxes payable. The excess deduction that would reduce income taxes payable and increase additional paid in capital was $2,732 as of January 30, 2016.

As of January 28, 2017, the ultimate outcomeCompany had a net operating loss of these proceedings, individually$224,519 (federal tax effected amount of $78,582) for federal income tax purposes that may be used to reduce future federal taxable income. As of January 28, 2017, the cumulative amount of tax deductions related to shared-based compensation and the corresponding compensation expense adjustment for financial reporting was $5,876 (federal and state tax effected amount of $2,350). The net operating losses for federal income tax purposes will expire between 2030 and 2037.

As of January 28, 2017, the Company recorded a $9,777 deferred tax asset related to net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes that may be used to reduce future state taxable income. The net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes expire between 2022 and 2037.

F-24


As of January 28, 2017, the Company had total deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards, reduced for excess stock deductions and uncertain tax positions, of $83,670, of which $74,752 and $8,918 were attributable to federal and domestic state and local jurisdictions, respectively.

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was $122,860 at January 28, 2017, increasing $121,836 from the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $1,024 at January 30, 2016. During fiscal 2016, the Company recorded additional valuation allowances in the aggregate, willamount of $121,836 due to the combination of (i) a current year pre-tax loss, including goodwill and tradename impairment charges; (ii) levels of projected pre-tax income; and (iii) the Company’s ability to carry forward or carry back tax losses. The valuation allowance of $1,024 at January 30, 2016, reflected management’s assessment, based on available information, that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets would not be realized due to the inability to generate sufficient state taxable income. The total valuation allowance on deferred tax assets decreased on a net basis by $50 in the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016. Adjustments to the valuation allowance are made when there is a change in management’s assessment of the amount of deferred tax assets that are realizable.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows:

 

Fiscal Year

 

(in thousands)

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Beginning balance

$

2,127

 

 

$

4,487

 

 

$

3,693

 

Increases for tax positions in current year

 

208

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

2,397

 

Increases for tax positions in prior years

 

4

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

135

 

Decreases for tax positions in prior years

 

 

 

 

(2,459

)

 

 

(1,738

)

Ending balance

$

2,339

 

 

$

2,127

 

 

$

4,487

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 , unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $0 and $2,161 (net of tax), respectively, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain temporary unrecognized tax benefits could fully reverse. Should this occur, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $2,339.

The Company includes accrued interest and penalties on underpayments of income taxes in its income tax provision. As of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, the Company did not have a material adverse impactany interest and penalties accrued on our financialits Consolidated Balance Sheets and no related provision or benefit was recognized in each of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015. Interest is computed on the difference between the tax position recognized net of any unrecognized tax benefits and the amount previously taken or results of operations or cash flows, litigationexpected to be taken in the Company’s tax returns.

With limited exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to inherent uncertainties.examination for U.S. federal and state income tax for 2007 and prior.

Note 14.11. Segment and Geographical Financial Information

We operateThe Company operates and manage ourmanages its business by distribution channel and havehas identified two reportable segments, as further described below. WeManagement considered both similar and dissimilar economic characteristics, internal reporting and management structures, as well as products, customers, and supply chain logistics to identify the following reportable segments:

Wholesale segment—consists of ourthe Company’s operations to distribute products to premiermajor department stores and specialty stores in the United States and select international markets.markets; and

Direct-to-consumer segment—consists of ourthe Company’s operations to distribute products directly to the consumer through ourits branded full-price specialty retail stores, outlet stores, and e-commerce platform.

The accounting policies of ourthe Company’s reportable segments are consistent with those described in Note 1. 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Unallocated corporate expenses are comprised of selling, general and administrative expenses attributable to corporate and administrative activities (such as marketing, design, finance, information technology, legal and human resources departments), and other charges that are not directly attributable to our operatingthe Company’s reportable segments. Unallocated corporate assets are comprised of capitalized deferred financing costs, the carrying values of ourthe Company’s goodwill and unamortized trademark, debt andtradename, deferred tax assets, and other assets that will be utilized to generate revenue for both of ourthe Company’s reportable segments. As the Company’s goodwill and tradename are not allocated to the Company’s reportable segments in the measure of segment assets regularly reported to and used by management, the corresponding impairment charges associated with the goodwill and tradename are not reflected in the operating results of the Company’s reportable segments.

Our wholesale segment sells apparel to our direct-to-consumer segment at cost. The wholesale intercompany sales of $16,916, $9,907, and $6,027 have been excluded from the net sales totals presented below for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, and fiscal 2011, respectively. Furthermore, as intercompany sales are sold at cost, no intercompany profit is reflected in operating income presented below.F-25


Summary information for our operatingthe Company’s reportable segments is presented below (in thousands).below.

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

  Fiscal Year 
  2013 2012 2011 

Net Sales

    

(in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net Sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

  $229,114   $203,107   $151,921  

 

$

170,053

 

 

$

201,182

 

 

$

259,418

 

Direct-to-consumer

   59,056   37,245   23,334  

 

 

98,146

 

 

 

101,275

 

 

 

80,978

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total net sales

  $288,170   $240,352   $175,255  

 

$

268,199

 

 

$

302,457

 

 

$

340,396

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating Income

    

Operating (Loss) Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

47,098

 

 

$

61,571

 

 

$

100,623

 

Direct-to-consumer (1)

 

 

1,216

 

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

14,556

 

Subtotal

 

 

48,314

 

 

 

69,410

 

 

 

115,179

 

Unallocated corporate expenses

 

 

(59,925

)

 

 

(53,684

)

 

 

(44,929

)

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset

 

 

(53,061

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating (loss) income

 

$

(64,672

)

 

$

15,726

 

 

$

70,250

 

Depreciation & Amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

  $81,822   $72,913   $62,635  

 

$

1,754

 

 

$

2,058

 

 

$

1,962

 

Direct-to-consumer

   10,435    4,465    559  

 

 

4,611

 

 

 

4,498

 

 

 

2,950

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subtotal

   92,957    77,378    63,194  

Unallocated expenses

   (42,904  (36,442  (20,277
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating income

  $49,353   $40,936    42,917  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Capital Expenditures

    

Unallocated corporate

 

 

2,319

 

 

 

1,794

 

 

 

355

 

Total depreciation & amortization

 

$

8,684

 

 

$

8,350

 

 

$

5,267

 

Capital Expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

  $1,832   $459   $146  

 

$

650

 

 

$

1,629

 

 

$

2,076

 

Direct-to-consumer

   8,241    1,362    1,304  

 

 

9,559

 

 

 

9,442

 

 

 

8,117

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unallocated corporate

 

 

4,078

 

 

 

6,520

 

 

 

9,506

 

Total capital expenditures

  $10,073   $1,821   $1,450  

 

$

14,287

 

 

$

17,591

 

 

$

19,699

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

   February 1, 2014   February 2, 2013 

Total Assets

    

Wholesale

  $78,122    $60,627  

Direct-to-consumer

   24,169     14,679  

Unallocated corporate

   312,051     165,986  

Discontinued operations

   —       200,832  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $414,342    $442,124  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales results

(1) Includes non-cash impairment charges totaling $2,082 related to property and equipment.  See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (I) Property and Equipment” for additional information.

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset in Fiscal 2016 includes pre-tax impairment charges of $53,061 related to the Company’s goodwill and tradename intangible asset. See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for further details.

Assets for each of the Company’s reportable segments are presented on a geographic basis below,below.

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Total Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

44,442

 

 

$

47,757

 

Direct-to-consumer

 

 

45,038

 

 

 

35,433

 

Unallocated corporate

 

 

150,000

 

 

 

280,378

 

Total assets

 

$

239,480

 

 

$

363,568

 

The Company is domiciled in thousands. We predominately operate within the U.S. and sell our productsas of January 28, 2017, had no active international subsidiaries. Although the Company maintains a showroom in 47 countries either directly to premier departmentParis through a local branch, substantially all marketing, sales, order management and specialty stores, or through distribution relationships with highly-regarded international partners with exclusive rights to certain territories. Salescustomer service functions are presented based on customer location. Substantiallyperformed in the U.S. and therefore substantially all of the Company’s sales originate in the U.S.  As a result, net sales by destination are no longer provided. Additionally, substantially all long-lived assets, including property plant and equipment and fixtures installed at ourthe Company’s retailer sites, are located in the U.S.

   2013   2012   2011 

Domestic

  $265,622    $221,632    $159,932  

International

   22,548     18,720     15,323  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net sales

  $288,170    $240,352    $175,255  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 15.12. Related Party Transactions

Shared Services Agreement

OnIn connection with the consummation of the Company’s IPO on November 27, 2013, Vince, LLC entered into thea Shared Services Agreement with Kellwood (the “Shared Services Agreement”), pursuant to which Kellwood provideswould provide support services in various operational areas including, among other things, certain accounting functions, tax, e-commerce operations, distribution, logistics, information

F-26


technology, accounts payable, credit and collections and payroll and benefits.benefits administration. Since the IPO, the Company had been in the process of transitioning certain functions performed by Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement and as of the end of fiscal 2016, the Company has completed the transition of all such functions and systems from Kellwood to the Company’s own systems or processes as well as to third-party service providers. Functions that transitioned to the Company, including its third-party service providers, include accounting related functions, tax, accounts payable, credit and collections, e-commerce customer service, distribution and logistics, payroll and benefits administration, and information technology support. Additionally, the Company has completed the implementation of its own enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) and supporting systems, point-of-sale system, third-party e-commerce platform, human resource payroll and recruitment systems, distribution applications, and network infrastructure.

In connection with the Kellwood Sale, the Shared Services Agreement was contributed to St. Louis, LLC. St. Louis, LLC continues to provide minor transitional services relating to historical records and legacy functions, which the Company is in the process of winding down. The Shared Services Agreement may be modified or supplementedwill terminate automatically upon the termination of all services provided thereunder. After termination of the agreement, St. Louis, LLC will have no obligation to include newprovide any services under terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon in good faith by the parties. Company.

The fees for all services received by Vince, LLC from Kellwood, including any new services mutually agreed upon byunder the parties, will beShared Services Agreement are at cost. Such costs shall beare the full amount of any and all actual and direct out-of-pocket expenses (including base salary and wages but without providing for any margin of profit or allocation of depreciation or amortization expense) incurred by the service provider or its affiliates in connection with the provision of the services.

We may terminate any or all ofThe Company is invoiced monthly for the services at any time for any reason (with or without cause) upon giving Kellwood the required advance notice for termination for that particular service. Additionally, the provision of the following services, which are services which require a term as a matter of law and services which are based on a third-party agreement with a set term, shall terminate automatically upon the related date specified on the schedules toprovided under the Shared Services Agreement: Building Services NY; Tax; and Compensation & Benefits. If no specific notice requirement has been provided, 90 days prior written notice shall be required to be given. Upon the termination of certain services, Kellwood may no longer be in a position to provide certain other related services. Kellwood must notify us within 10 days following our request to terminate any services if they will no longer be able to provide other related services. Assuming we proceed with our request to terminate the original services, such related services shall also be terminated in connection with such termination.

We are invoiced by Kellwood monthly for these amountsAgreement and generally beis required to pay within 15 business days of receiving such invoice. The payments willcan be trued-up and can be disputed once each fiscal quarter. For the years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, the Company recognized $4,256, $9,357 and $11,436, respectively, of expense within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for services provided under the Shared Services Agreement. As of February 1, 2014, we haveJanuary 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, the Company has recorded $873$37 and $858, respectively, in otherOther accrued expenses to recognize amounts payable to Kellwood under the Shared Services Agreement.

Tax Receivable Agreement

Vince Holding Corp.VHC entered into thea Tax Receivable Agreement with the Pre-IPO Stockholders on November 27, 2013. WeThe Company and ourits former subsidiaries have generated certain tax benefits (including NOLs and tax credits) prior to the restructuring transactionsRestructuring Transactions consummated in connection with our initial public offeringthe Company’s IPO and will generate certain section 197 intangible deductions (the “Pre-IPO Tax Benefits”), which would reduce the actual liability for taxes that wethe Company might otherwise be required to pay. The Tax Receivable Agreement provides for payments to the Pre-IPO Stockholders in an amount equal to 85% of the aggregate reduction in taxes payable realized by usthe Company and ourits subsidiaries from the utilization of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits (the “Net Tax Benefit”).

For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the Net Tax Benefit equals (i) with respect to a taxable year, the excess, if any, of (A) ourthe Company’s liability for taxes using the same methods, elections, conventions and similar practices used on the relevant company return assuming there were no Pre-IPO Tax Benefits over (B) ourthe Company’s actual liability for taxes for such taxable year (the “Realized Tax Benefit”), plus (ii) for each prior taxable year, the excess, if any, of the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on an amended schedule applicable to such prior taxable year over the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the original tax benefit schedule for such prior taxable year, minus (iii) for each prior taxable year, the excess, if any, of the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the original tax benefit schedule for such prior taxable year over the Realized Tax Benefit reflected on the amended schedule for such prior taxable year; provided, however, that to extent any of the adjustments described in clauses (ii) and (iii) were reflected in the calculation of the tax benefit payment for any subsequent taxable year, such adjustments shall not be taken into account in determining the Net Tax Benefit for any subsequent taxable year.

While the Tax Receivable Agreement is designed with the objective of causing ourthe Company’s annual cash costs attributable to federal, state and local income taxes (without regard to ourthe Company’s continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits) to be the same as that which wethe Company would have paid had wethe Company not had the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits available to offset ourits federal, state and local taxable income, there are circumstances in which this may not be the case. In particular, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that any payments by usthe Company thereunder shall not be refundable. In that regard, the payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement differ from a payment of a federal income tax liability in that a tax refund would not be available to usthe Company under the Tax Receivable Agreement even if wethe Company were to incur a net operating loss for federal income tax purposes in a future tax year. Similarly, the Pre-IPO Stockholders will not reimburse usthe Company for any payments previously made if any tax benefits relating to such payments are subsequently disallowed, although the amount of any such tax benefits subsequently disallowed will reduce future payments (if any) otherwise owed to such Pre-IPO Stockholders. In addition, depending on the amount and timing of ourthe Company’s future earnings (if any) and on other factors including the effect of any limitations imposed on ourthe Company’s ability to use the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits, it is possible that all payments required under the Tax Receivable Agreement could become due within a relatively short period of time following consummation of our initial public offering.the Company’s IPO.

If wethe Company had not entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, wethe Company would be entitled to realize the full economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits to the extent allowed by federal, state and local law. The Tax Receivable Agreement is designed with the objective of causing ourthe Company’s annual cash costs attributable to federal, state and local income taxes (without regard to ourthe Company’s continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits) to be the same as wethe Company would have paid had wethe

F-27


Company not had the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits available to offset ourits federal, state and local taxable income. As a result, stockholders who purchased shares in the IPO are not entitled to the economic benefit of the Pre-IPO Tax Benefits that would have been available if the Tax Receivable Agreement were not in effect, except to the extent of ourthe Company’s continuing 15% interest in the Pre-IPO Benefits.

Additionally, the payments we makethe Company makes to the Pre-IPO Stockholders under the Tax Receivable Agreement are not expected to give rise to any incidental tax benefits to us,the Company, such as deductions or an adjustment to the basis of ourthe Company’s assets.

An affiliate of Sun Capital may elect to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below). In connection with any such termination, we arethe Company is obligated to pay the present value (calculated at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 200 basis points as of such date) of all remaining Net Tax Benefit payments that would be required to be paid to the Pre-IPO Stockholders from such termination date, applying the valuation assumptions set forth in the Tax Receivable Agreement (the “Early Termination Period”). “Change of control,” as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement shall mean an event or series of events by which (i) Apparel Holding Corp.VHC shall cease directly or indirectly to own 100% of the capital stock of Vince, LLC; (ii) any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than one or more permitted investors, shall be the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) of capital stock having more, directly or indirectly, than 35% of the total voting power of all outstanding capital stock of Vince Holding Corp. in the election of directors, unless at such time the permitted investors are direct or indirect “beneficial owners” (as so defined) of capital stock of Vince Holding Corp. having a greater percentage of the total voting power of all outstanding capital stock of Vince Holding Corp.VHC in the election of directors than that owned by each other “person” or “group” described above; (iii) for any reason whatsoever, a majority of the board of directors of Vince Holding Corp.VHC shall not be continuing directors; or (iv) a “Change of Control” (or comparable term) shall occur under (x) any term loan or revolving credit facility of Vince Holding Corp.VHC or its subsidiaries or (y) any unsecured, senior, senior subordinated or subordinated Indebtednessindebtedness of Vince Holding Corp.VHC or its subsidiaries, if, in each case, the outstanding principal amount thereof is in excess of $15,000. WeThe Company may also terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement by paying the Early Termination Payment to the Pre-IPO Stockholders. Additionally, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that in the event that we breachthe Company breaches any material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the Tax Receivable Agreement in a case

commenced under the Bankruptcy Code, then the Early Termination Payment plus other outstanding amounts under the Tax Receivable Agreement shall become due and payable.

The Tax Receivable Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (i) the date all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, (ii) the last day of the tax year including the tenth anniversary of the IPO Restructuring Transactions and (iii) the mutual agreement of the parties thereto, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms thereof.

The Company had expected to make a required payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. As a result of lower than expected cash from operations due to weaker than projected performance, and the level of projected availability under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility, management concluded that the Company would not be able to fund the payment when due. Accordingly, on September 1, 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to the Tax Receivable Agreement with Sun Cardinal, LLC, an affiliate of Sun Capital Partners, Inc., for itself and as a representative of the other stockholders parties thereto. Pursuant to this amendment, Sun Cardinal agreed to postpone payment of the tax benefit with respect to the 2014 taxable year, estimated at $21,762 plus accrued interest, to September 15, 2016. The amendment to the Tax Receivable Agreement also waived the application of a default interest rate at LIBOR plus 500 basis points per annum on the postponed payment. The interest rate on the postponed payment remained at LIBOR plus 200 basis points per annum. As a condition of the Investment Agreement, the Company repaid its obligation, including accrued interest, totaling $22,262, with respect to the 2014 taxable year under the Tax Receivable Agreement upon the closing of the Rights Offering.

As of February 1, 2014 we have recorded $173,146 to recognize ourJanuary 28, 2017, the Company’s total obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement is estimated to be $140,618, of which has$2,788 is included as a termcomponent of ten years,Other accrued expenses and $137,830 is included as Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The tax benefit payment of $7,438, including accrued interest, with respect to the 2015 taxable year was paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The Tax Receivable Agreement expires on December 31, 2023. The obligation was originally recorded in connection with the IPO as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital on ourthe Company’s Consolidated Balance SheetSheet. During fiscal 2016, the obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement was adjusted primarily as a result of changes in tax laws that impacted the net operating loss deferred tax assets. The adjustment resulted in a net decrease of $209 to the liability under the Tax Receivable Agreement with the corresponding adjustment accounted for as a decrease to Other expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During fiscal 2015, the Company adjusted the obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement in connection with the filing of its 2014 income tax returns and as a result of changes in tax laws that impacted the net operating loss deferred tax assets. These adjustments resulted in a net increase of $1,154 to the pre-IPO deferred tax assets and a net increase of $981 to the liability under the Tax Receivable Agreement with the corresponding net increase accounted for as an adjustment to other expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations. During fiscal year 2014, the Company adjusted the obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement in connection with the filing of its 2013 income tax returns. The return to provision adjustment resulted in a net reduction of $818 to the pre-IPO deferred tax assets and a net reduction of $1,442 to the liability under the Tax Receivable Agreement with the corresponding net increase of $624 accounted for as an adjustment to additional paid in-capital. In addition, the Company made its

F-28


first tax benefit payment with respect to the 2013 taxable year of $3,199 including accrued interest which was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.

Investment Agreement and Rights Offering

On March 15, 2016, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with the Investors pursuant to which Sun Cardinal and SCSF Cardinal agreed to backstop the Rights Offering by purchasing at the subscription price of $5.50 per share any and all shares not subscribed through the exercise of rights, including the oversubscription. 

On March 29, 2016, the Company commenced a Rights Offering, whereby the Company distributed, at no charge, to stockholders of record as of February 1, 2014. Approximately $4,131 is recordedMarch 23, 2016 (the “Rights Offering Record Date”), rights to purchase new shares of the Company’s common stock at $5.50 per share. Each stockholder as of the Rights Offering Record Date (“Rights Holders”) received one non-transferrable right to purchase 0.3191 shares for every share of common stock owned on the Rights Offering Record Date (the “subscription right”). Rights Holders who fully exercised their subscription rights were entitled to subscribe for additional shares that remained unsubscribed as a componentresult of other accrued expenses and $169,015 as other liabilitiesany unexercised subscription rights (the “over-subscription right”). The over-subscription right allowed a Rights Holder to subscribe for an additional number of shares equal to up to 20% of the shares of common stock for which such holder was otherwise entitled to subscribe. Subscription rights could only be exercised for whole numbers of shares; no fractional shares of common stock were issued in the Rights Offering. The Rights Offering period expired on our Consolidated Balance Sheet asApril 14, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. New York City time, prior to which payment for all subscription rights required an irrevocable funding of February 1, 2014.

Transfer Agreement

On November 27, 2013, Kellwood and Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC entered into a transfer agreement (the “Transfer Agreement”). Pursuantcash to the termstransfer agent, to be held in an account for the benefit of the Transfer Agreement,Company. The Investors fully subscribed in the following transactions occurred:

Kellwood distributed the Vince, LLC equity interests to Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC in exchangeRights Offering and exercised their oversubscription right. The Company received subscriptions and oversubscriptions from its existing stockholders for a $341,500 promissory note issued by Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC (the “Kellwood Note Receivable”).

Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC immediately repaidtotal of 11,622,518 shares of its common stock, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $63,924. Simultaneous with the Kellwood Note Receivable in full using approximately $172,000closing of such net proceeds along with $169,500the Rights Offering, the Company received $1,076 of net borrowings under the new Term Loan Facility. Using thegross proceeds from the repaymentrelated Investment Agreement and issued to the Investors 195,663 shares of its common stock in connection therewith. In total, the Company received total gross proceeds of $65,000 as a result of the Kellwood Note Receivable, after giving effect toRights Offering and related Investment Agreement transactions and recorded increases of $118 within Common Stock and $63,992 within Additional paid-in capital on the contributionconsolidated balance sheet. Upon the completion of $70,100 of indebtedness under the Sun Term Loan Agreements to the capital of Vince Holding Corp. bythese transactions, affiliates of Sun Capital Kellwood repaidowned 58% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

The Company used a portion of the net proceeds received from the Rights Offering and dischargedrelated Investment Agreement to (1) repay the indebtedness outstandingamount owed by the Company under its revolving credit facilitythe Tax Receivable Agreement (as discussed above) with Sun Cardinal, for itself and the Sun Term Loan Agreements, and redeemed all of its issued and outstanding 12.875% Notes. Kellwood also redeemed $38,100 aggregate principal amount of its 7.125% Notes, at par pursuant to a tender offer. In addition, Kellwood also used such proceeds to pay certain restructuring fees to Sun Capital Management. Kellwood also paid a debt recovery bonus of $6,000 to our Chief Executive Officer.

Kellwood refinanced its revolving credit facility to, among other things, release Vince, LLC as a guarantor or obligor thereunder.

In accordance with the termsrepresentative of the Transfer Agreement, Kellwood has agreed to indemnify usother stockholders party thereto, for any losses which we may suffer, sustain or become subject to, relating to the Kellwood business or in connection with any contract contributed to us by Kellwood which is not by its terms permitted to be assigned. Kellwood has also agreed to indemnify us for any losses associated with its failure to satisfy its obligations under the Transfer Agreementtax benefit with respect to the repayment, repurchase, discharge or refinancing of certain of its2014 taxable year including accrued interest, totaling $22,262, and (2) repay all then outstanding indebtedness, as described intotaling $20,000, under the immediately prior paragraph (including with respectCompany’s Revolving Credit Facility. The Company intends to use the removal of Vince, LLC as an obligor or guarantor under its refinanced revolving credit facility). Additionally, Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC has agreed to indemnify Kellwood against any losses which Kellwood may suffer, sustain or become subject to relating to the Vince business. The parties also agreed, upon the request of either the other party to, without further consideration, execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such other instruments of conveyance, transfer, assignment and confirmation, and shall take or cause to be taken, such further or other actions as the other party may deem necessary or desirable to carry out the intent and purpose of the Transfer Agreement and give effect to the transactions contemplated thereby.

Kellwood Note Receivable

Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC issued the Kellwood Note Receivable in the aggregate principal amount of $341,500 to Kellwood Company, LLC on November 27, 2013, immediately prior to the consummation of our

initial public offering. Vince Intermediate Holding, LLC repaid the Kellwood Note Receivable on the same day, usingremaining net proceeds, from our initial public offeringwhich funds are held by VHC until needed by its operating subsidiary, for additional strategic investments and net borrowings under the Term Loan Facility. No interest accrued under the Kellwood Note Receivable as the Kellwood Note Receivable was repaid on the date of issuance.

Debt Recovery Bonus to Our Chief Executive Officer

Our CEO received a debt recovery bonus of $6,000 (which included $440 of a prior unpaid debt recovery bonus) in connection with the repayment of certain Kellwood indebtedness, calculated as 4.4% of the related debt recovery, on November 27, 2013. Kellwood used proceeds from the repayment of the Kellwood Note Receivable to pay this bonus to our CEO at the closing of our initial public offering.

Earnout Agreement

In connection with the acquisition of the Vince business, Kellwood entered into an earnout agreement with CRL Group (former owners of the Vince business) providing for contingent earnout payments as additional consideration for the purchase of substantially all of the assets and properties of CRL Group (the “Earnout Agreement”). Rea Laccone, our founder and former Chief Executive Officer, is a member of the CRL Group. The Earnout Agreement provides for the payment of contingent annual earnout payments to CRL Group for five periods between 2007 and 2011, with the contingent amounts earned based on the amount of net sales and gross margin in each such period. The Earnout Agreement also provides for a cumulative contingent payment based on the amount of net sales during the Earnout Agreement period. Kellwood made payments under the Earnout Agreement of $806, and $58,456 during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. No amounts were paid to Ms. Laccone under the Earnout Agreement for fiscal 2013.

Certain Indebtedness to affiliates of Sun Capital

We had substantial indebtedness owed to affiliates of Sun Capital after giving effect to the acquisition of Kellwood Company by affiliates of Sun Capital Partners, Inc. in February 2008 under the Sun Promissory Notes and Sun Capital Loan Agreement (as defined in Note 7). Subsequent to 2008, Kellwood Company made borrowings under the Sun Term Loan Agreements (as defined in Note 3) to fund negative cash flows of the non-Vince business. Allgeneral corporate purposes, which may include future amounts owed by Vince Holding Corp. under these agreements were discharged as of February 1, 2014, as further discussed below.

On December 28, 2012, Sun Kellwood Finance waived all interest capitalized and accruedthe Company under the Sun Promissory notes prior to July 19, 2012. Additionally, Sun Kellwood Finance and SCSF Finance waived all interest capitalized and accrued under the Sun Capital Loan Agreement prior to July 19, 2012. As all parties were under the common control of affiliates of Sun Capital, both transactions resulted in capital contributions of $270,852 and $18,249 for the Sun Promissory Notes and Sun Capital Loan Agreement, respectively. The capital contributions were recorded as adjustments to additional paid in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2013. These transactions had no significant income tax consequences. The remaining principal and capitalized PIK interest owed under these agreements of $391,434 were reported within long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2013.

On June 18, 2013, Sun Kellwood Finance and SCSF Finance assigned all title and interest in both the Sun Promissory Notes and note under our Sun Capital Loan Agreement to Sun Cardinal, LLC. Immediately following the assignment of these notes, Sun Cardinal contributed all outstanding principal and interest due under these notes as of June 18, 2013 to the capital of Vince Holding Corp. As all parties were under the common control of Sun Capital at such time, these transactions were recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2013 as increases to Vince Holding Corp.’s additional paid in capital in the amounts of $334,595 and $72,932 for the Sun Promissory Notes and Sun Capital Loan Agreement, respectively. As a result, Vince Holding Corp. has been discharged of

all obligations under both agreements.Tax Receivable Agreement. See Note 7. Immediately prior1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (D) Sources and Uses of Liquidity” for additional details regarding the Company’s ability to utilize the Restructuring Transactions, affiliates of Sun Capital contributed $38,683 of principal under the Sun Term Loan Agreements to the capital of Kellwood Company.

On November 27, 2013, subsequent to the closing of the IPO and in connection with the Restructuring Transactions, all remaining debt obligations to affiliates of Sun Capital under the Sun Term Loan Agreements were retained by Kellwood Company, amounting to $83,355 (including accrued interest). Kellwood Company immediately discharged all obligations under these agreements through the application of a portion of the Kellwood Note Receivablenet proceeds. See Note 3.

Management Services Agreement

In connection with the acquisition of Kellwood Company by affiliates of Sun Capital in 2008, Sun Capital Partners Management V, LLC, an affiliate of Sun Capital, entered into the Management Services Agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”) with Kellwood Company. Under this agreement, Sun Capital Management provided Kellwood Company with consulting and advisory services, including services relating to financing alternatives, financial reporting, accounting and management information systems. In exchange, Kellwood Company reimbursed Sun Capital Management for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with providing consulting and advisory services, additional and customary and reasonable fees for management consulting services provided in connection with corporate events, and also paid an annual management fee equal to $2,200 which was prepaid in equal quarterly installments, a portion of which was charged to the Vince business. WeThe Company reported $404, $779$0, $0 and $478$79 for management fees to Sun Capital in otherOther expense, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2013,2016, fiscal 2012,2015 and fiscal 2011, respectively. The remaining fees charged to the non-Vince businesses of $1,537, $1,668, and $1,949 are included within net loss from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012, and fiscal 2011,2014, respectively.

Upon the consummation of certain corporate events involving Kellwood Company or its direct or indirect subsidiaries, Kellwood Company was required to pay Sun Capital Management a transaction fee in an amount equal to 1% of the aggregate consideration paid to or by Kellwood Company and any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries or stockholders. WeThe Company incurred no material transaction fees payable to Sun Capital Management during all periods presented on the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statement of Operations. We reported $926 for outstanding transaction fees within Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2013.operations.

On November 27, 2013, in connection with the closing of the Company’s IPO and Restructuring Transactions, VHC was released from the terms of the Management Services Agreement between Kellwood Company and Sun Capital Management.

F-29


Sun Capital Consulting Agreement

On November 27, 2013, wethe Company entered into an agreement with Sun Capital Management to (i) reimburse Sun Capital Management Corp. (“Sun Capital Management”) or any of its affiliates providing consulting services under the agreement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing consulting services to usthe Company and (ii) provide Sun Capital Management with customary indemnification for any such services.

The agreement is scheduled to terminate on November 27, 2023, the tenth anniversary of our initial public offering (i.e. November 27, 2023).the Company’s IPO. Under the consulting agreement, we havethe Company has no obligation to pay Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates any consulting fees other than those which are approved by a majority of ourthe Company’s directors that are not affiliated with Sun Capital. To the extent such fees are approved in the future, wethe Company will be obligated to pay such fees in addition to reimbursing Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates that provide usthe Company services under the consulting agreement for all reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by such party in

connection with the provision of consulting services under the consulting agreement and any related matters. Reimbursement of such expenses shall not be conditioned upon the approval of a majority of ourthe Company’s directors that are not affiliated with Sun Capital Management, and shall be payable in addition to any fees that such directors may approve.

Neither Sun Capital Management nor any of its affiliates are liable to usthe Company or ourthe Company’s affiliates, securityholderssecurity holders or creditors for (1) any liabilities arising out of, related to, caused by, based upon or in connection with the performance of services under the consulting agreement, unless such liability is proven to have resulted directly and primarily from the willful misconduct or gross negligence of such person or (2) pursuing any outside activities or opportunities that may conflict with ourthe Company’s best interests, which outside activities we consentthe Company consents to and approveapproves under the consulting agreement, and which opportunities neither Sun Capital Management nor any of its affiliates will have any duty to inform usthe Company of. In no event will the aggregate of any liabilities of Sun Capital Management or any of its affiliates exceed the aggregate of any fees paid under the consulting agreement.

In addition, we arethe Company is required to indemnify Sun Capital Management, its affiliates and any successor by operation of law against any and all liabilities, whether or not arising out of or related to such party’s performance of services under the consulting agreement, except to the extent proven to result directly and primarily from such person’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. We areThe Company is also required to defend such parties in any lawsuits which may be brought against such parties and advance expenses in connection therewith. In the case of affiliates of Sun Capital Management that have rights to indemnification and advancement from affiliates of Sun Capital, we agreethe Company agrees to be the indemnitor of first resort, to be liable for the full amounts of payments of indemnification required by any organizational document of such entity or any agreement to which such entity is a party, and that wethe Company will not make any claims against any affiliates of Sun Capital Partners for contribution, subrogation, exoneration or reimbursement for which they are liable under any organizational documents or agreement. Sun Capital Management may, in its sole discretion, elect to terminate the consulting agreement at any time. WeThe Company may elect to terminate the consulting agreement if SCSF Cardinal, Sun Cardinal or any of their respective affiliates’ aggregate ownership of ourthe Company’s equity securities falls below 30%.

During fiscal 2016, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, the Company incurred expenses of $121, $114 and $76, respectively, under the Sun Capital Consulting Agreement.

Indemnification Agreements

WeThe Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of ourits executive officers and directors on November 27, 2013.directors. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL.

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

OurThe Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that for so long as affiliates of Sun Capital own 30% or more of ourthe Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, Sun Cardinal, a Sun Capital affiliate, has the right to designate a majority of ourthe Company’s board of directors. For so long as Sun Cardinal has the right to designate a majority of ourthe Company’s board of directors, the directors designated by Sun Cardinal are expected to constitute a majority of each committee of ourthe Company’s board of directors (other than the Audit Committee), and the chairman of each of the committees (other than the Audit Committee) is expected to be a director serving on the committee who is selected by affiliates of Sun Capital, provided that, at such time as we arethe Company is not a “controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards, ourthe Company’s committee membership will comply with all applicable requirements of those standards and a majority of ourthe Company’s board of directors will be “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the NYSE, subject to any applicable phase in requirements.

F-30


Note 13. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

Summarized quarterly financial results for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 are as follows:

(in thousands, expect per share data)

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter (1)

 

Fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

67,645

 

 

$

60,702

 

 

$

75,973

 

 

$

63,879

 

Gross profit

 

 

28,258

 

 

 

27,387

 

 

 

37,958

 

 

 

29,216

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

(1,924

)

 

 

(1,967

)

 

 

3,380

 

 

 

(162,148

)

Basic (loss) earnings per share (2)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(0.04

)

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(3.28

)

Diluted (loss) earnings per share (2)

 

$

(0.05

)

 

$

(0.04

)

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(3.28

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, expect per share data)

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter (3)

 

 

Third

Quarter (4)

 

 

Fourth Quarter (5)

 

Fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

59,842

 

 

$

79,993

 

 

$

80,859

 

 

$

81,763

 

Gross profit

 

 

30,741

 

 

 

20,789

 

 

 

40,005

 

 

 

40,981

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

2,454

 

 

 

(5,026

)

 

 

5,893

 

 

 

1,778

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share (2)

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(0.14

)

 

$

0.16

 

 

$

0.05

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share (2)

 

$

0.06

 

 

$

(0.14

)

 

$

0.16

 

 

$

0.05

 

(1)

Net loss, basic loss per share and diluted loss per share include the impact of (i) $53,061 of non-cash pre-tax impairment charges related to goodwill and the tradename intangible asset (see Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (K) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for additional details); (ii) a $2,082 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge related to property and equipment (see Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (J) Impairment of Long-lived Assets” for additional details); and (iii) a $121,836 valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets (see Note 10 “Income Taxes”) for additional details.

(2)

The sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the full-year amount as the computation of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for each quarter and the full-year are performed independently.

(3)

Includes the impact of $14,447 of pre-tax expense within cost of products sold associated with inventory write-downs primarily related to excess out of season and current inventory and $2,861 of pre-tax expense within selling, general and administrative expenses associated with executive severance costs partly offset by the favorable impact of executive stock option forfeitures.

(4)

Includes the impact of $1,986 of pre-tax income within Cost of products sold associated with the favorable impact of the recovery on inventory write downs taken in the second quarter of 2015 and $164 pre-tax expense within Selling, general and administrative expenses associated with executive search costs, partly offset by the favorable impact of executive stock option forfeitures.

(5)

Includes the impact of $2,161 of pre-tax income within Cost of products sold associated with the favorable impact of the recovery on inventory write downs taken in the second quarter of 2015 and $323 pre-tax income within Selling, general and administrative expenses associated with the favorable adjustment to management transition costs taken in the second quarter. Additionally, gross profit, net income (loss) and diluted earnings (loss) per share in the fourth quarter were overstated by $530, $313 and $0.01, respectively, as a result of an immaterial error in inventory valuation during the third quarter.

Note 16.14. Subsequent Event

In order to increase availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, on March 6, 2017, Vince, LLC entered into the Letter with BofA, as administrative agent and collateral agent under the Revolving Credit Facility, to temporarily modify a covenant. On March 27, 2014April 14, 2017, Vince, LLC and BofA amended and restated the Company made a voluntary pre-payment of $5,000 on the Term Loan Facility.

Letter in its entirety. See Note 4 “Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements” for additional details.

F-31


Note 17. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

Summarized quarterly financial results for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 (in thousands, except per share data):

   First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

Fiscal 2013:

     

Net sales

  $40,363   $74,294   $85,755   $87,758  

Gross profit

   17,513    33,638    41,723    40,142  

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (9,779  8,395    16,468    8,311  

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (5,330  (18,929  (18,827  (7,729

Net income (loss)

   (15,109  (10,534  (2,359  582  

Net income (loss) per share-basic(1):

     

Continuing operations

  $(0.37 $0.32   $0.63   $0.24  

Discontinued operations

  $(0.20 $(0.72 $(0.72 $(0.22

Net income (loss) per share-diluted(1):

     

Continuing operations

  $(0.37 $0.32   $0.62   $0.24  

Discontinued operations

  $(0.20 $(0.72 $(0.72 $(0.22

Fiscal 2012(2):

     

Net sales

  $33,376   $57,155   $76,990   $72,831  

Gross profit

   14,777    25,635    35,118    32,666  

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   (23,244  (13,373  5,702    1,220  

Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (23,911  (20,679  (20,597  (12,827

Net loss

   (47,155  (34,052  (14,895  (11,607

Net income (loss) per share-basic(1):

     

Continuing operations

  $(0.89 $(0.51 $0.22   $0.05  

Discontinued operations

  $(0.91 $(0.79 $(0.79 $(0.49

Net income (loss) per share-diluted(1):

     

Continuing operations

  $(0.89 $(0.51 $0.22   $0.05  

Discontinued operations

  $(0.91 $(0.79 $(0.79 $(0.49

(1)The sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the full-year amount as the computation of weighted-average number of shares outstanding for each quarter and the full-year are performed independently.
(2)Fiscal 2012 consisted of 53 weeks, with the additional week included in the Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2012.

SCHEDULESCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(In thousands)

 

Description

  Beginning
of Period
  Expense
Charges,
net of
Reversals
  Deductions
and
Write-
offs,
net of
Recoveries
  End of
Period
 

Sales Allowances

     

Fiscal 2013

   (7,179  (39,171  37,085    (9,265

Fiscal 2012

   (4,347  (29,400  26,568    (7,179

Fiscal 2011

   (2,540  (17,916  16,109    (4,347

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     

Fiscal 2013

   (279  (249  175    (353

Fiscal 2012

   (450  (314  485    (279

Fiscal 2011

   (244  (319  113    (450

Valuation Allowance on Deferred Income Taxes

     

Fiscal 2013

   (64,767  (78,855  141,779(a)   (1,843

Fiscal 2012

   (49,933  (28,362  13,528    (64,767

Fiscal 2011

   (32,280  (31,961  14,308    (49,933

 

 

Beginning of Period

 

 

Expense Charges, net of Reversals

 

 

Deductions and Write-offs, net of Recoveries

 

 

End of Period

 

Sales Allowances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

$

(12,846

)

 

$

(59,078

)

 

$

52,213

 

 

$

(19,711

)

Fiscal 2015

 

 

(16,098

)

 

 

(55,656

)

 

 

58,908

 

 

 

(12,846

)

Fiscal 2014

 

 

(9,265

)

 

 

(54,467

)

 

 

47,634

 

 

 

(16,098

)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

 

(188

)

 

 

(192

)

 

 

105

 

 

 

(275

)

Fiscal 2015

 

 

(379

)

 

 

34

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

(188

)

Fiscal 2014

 

 

(353

)

 

 

(168

)

 

 

142

 

 

 

(379

)

Provision for Inventories

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

 

(13,248

)

 

 

1,864

 

 

 

9,322

 

 

 

(2,062

)

Fiscal 2015

 

 

(6,464

)

 

 

(16,263

)

 

 

9,479

 

 

 

(13,248

)

Fiscal 2014

 

 

(3,868

)

 

 

(3,719

)

 

 

1,123

 

 

 

(6,464

)

Valuation Allowances on Deferred Income Taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

 

(1,024

)

 

 

(121,836

)

 

 

 

 

 

(122,860

)

Fiscal 2015

 

 

(1,074

)

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

(1,024

)

Fiscal 2014

 

 

(1,843

)

 

 

 

 

 

769

 

 

 

(1,074

)

 

(a)The reduction in the Valuation Allowance on Deferred Income Taxes recorded in Fiscal 2013 includes $127,833 that was recognized as in increase to additional paid-in capital in Stockholders’ Equity.

 

F-38

F-32