UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM10-K

 

 

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20142017

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number0-16148

 

 

MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION

 

 

 

Incorporated in the

State of Ohio

 

IRS Employer Identification

Number31-1125853

4053 Clough Woods Dr.

Batavia, OH 45103

Name of Each Exchange

on Which Registered

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered

NASDAQ Global Select Market

(513)381-1480

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K  ¨☒..

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨  Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates was approximately $255,556,000$660,665,940 based upon the closing price of $33.93$66.00 per share of Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market as of September 30, 2013,2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of May 31, 2014, 16,430,285April 30, 2017, 16,951,808 shares of no par value Common Stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on August 20, 20149, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

 

      Page 

Part I

Part I

    

Item 1

-  

Item 1 - Business

   34 
 

Item 1A

-

Risk Factors

   68 
 

Item 1B

-

Unresolved Staff Comments

   14 
 

Item 2

-

Properties

   15 
 

Item 3

-

Legal Proceedings

   16 
 

Item 4

-

Mine Safety Disclosures

   16 

Part II

    

Item 5

-  

Item 5 - Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   1617 
 

Item 6

-

Selected Financial Data

   1819 
 

Item 7

-

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   1920 
 

Item 7A

-

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   29 
 

Item 8

-

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   30 
 

Item 9

-

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   6265 
 

Item 9A

-

Controls and Procedures

   6366 
 

Item 9B

-

Other Information

   6466 

Part III

    

Item 10

-  

Item 10 - Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   6567 
 

Item 11

-

Executive Compensation

   6567 
 

Item 12

-

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   6567 
 

Item 13

-

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   6567 
 

Item 14

-

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   6567 

Part IV

    

Item 15

-  

Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   6567

Item 16

-

Form 10-K Summary

69 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company believesThis report contains certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and that are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by that Act. All statements contained in this Form 10-K other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, plans and objectives of management for future operations. The words “may,” “continue,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate” and similar expressions (as well as the negative versions thereof) may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. With respect to the forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied. AnySuch forward-looking statement speaksstatements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which they are made.

Statements concerning expected financial performance, on-going business strategies, and possible future actions which the Company intends to pursue in order to achieve strategic objectives constitute forward-looking information. Implementation of these strategies and the achievement of such financial performance areis each subject to numerous conditions, uncertainties and risk factors, including those contained in Item 1A in “Risk Factors”.Factors.” Factors which could cause actual performance by the Company to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, without limitation: factors discussed in conjunction with a forward-looking statement; changes in generalglobal economic and business conditions; changes in business strategies or plans; raw material cost pressures; availability of raw materials; availability to pass raw material cost increases to our customers; interruption of business operations; changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations, legal proceedings and developments; acceptance of new product offerings, services and technologies; new developments in packaging; our ability to effectively manage our growth and execute our long-term strategy; our ability to manage foreign operations and the risks involved with them, including compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws; currency exchange rate fluctuations; our ability to manage global political uncertainty; terrorism and political unrest; increases in general interest rate levels and credit market volatility affecting our interest costs; competition within our industry; our ability to consummate and successfully integrate acquisitions; our ability to recognize the benefits of acquisitions, including potential synergies and cost savings; failure of an acquisition or acquired company to achieve its plans and objectives generally; risk that proposed or consummated acquisitions may disrupt operations or pose difficulties in employee retention or otherwise affect financial or operating results; ability to manage foreign operations; currency exchange rate fluctuations;risk that some of our goodwill may be or later become impaired; the success and financial condition of the Company’sour significant customers; competition; acceptance ofdependence on information technology; our ability to market new product offerings; changes in business strategy or plans; quality of management; the Company’sproducts; our ability to maintain an effective system of internal control; the Company’s ability to remediate our material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;ongoing claims, lawsuits and governmental proceedings, including environmental proceedings; availability, terms and developmentdevelopments of capital and credit; cost and price changes; raw material cost pressures; availabilitydependence on key personnel; quality of raw materials;management; our ability to pass raw material cost increases to its customers; business abilitiesprotect our intellectual property and judgment of personnel; changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations, legal proceedingspotential for intellectual property litigation; employee benefit costs; and developments; risk associated with significant leverage; increases in general interest rate levels affecting the Company’s interest costs; ability to manage global political uncertainty; and terrorism and political unrest.leverage. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

(In thousands, except for statistical data)

OVERVIEW

Multi-Color Corporation (Multi-Color, MCC, We, Us, Ourwe, us, our or the Company), headquartered near Cincinnati, Ohio, is a leader in global label solutions supporting a number of the world’s most prominent brands including leading producers of home & personal care, wine & spirit,spirits, food & beverage, healthcare and specialty consumer products. MCC serves international brand owners in North, Central and South America, Europe, China, Southeast Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa and China with a comprehensive range of the latest label technologies in Pressure Sensitive, Glue-Applied (Cut and Stack), In-Mold, Shrink Sleeve and Heat Transfer.

The Company was incorporated in 1985, succeeding the predecessor business. Our corporate offices are located at 4053 Clough Woods Drive, Batavia, Ohio 45103 and our telephone number is (513) 381-1480.

Our common stock, no par value, is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “LABL”. See “Item 5 – Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.” We maintain a website (www.mcclabel.com), which includes additional information about the Company. The website includes corporate governance information for our shareholders and our Code of Ethics can be found under the corporate governance section. Information on the website is not part of this Form 10-K. Shareholders can also obtain on and through our website, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such materials with or furnishes such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Any of these documents may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the SEC Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s filed documents may also be accessed via the SEC Internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

References to 2017, 2016 and 2015 are for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

The Company provides a wide range of products for the packaging needs of our customers and is one of the world’s largest producers of high quality pressure sensitive, in-mold and heat transfer labels, and a major manufacturer of glue-applied and shrink sleeve labels. The Company also provides a full complement of print methods including flexographic, lithographic, rotogravure, letterpress and digital, plus in-house pre-press services.

Pressure Sensitive Labels:

Pressure sensitive labels adhere to a surface with pressure. The label typically consists of four elements – a substrate, which may include paper, foil or plastic; an adhesive, which may be permanent or removable; a release coating; and a backing material to protect the adhesive against premature contact with other surfaces. The release coating and protective backing are removed prior to application to the container, exposing the adhesive, and the label is pressed or rolled into place. Innovative features of this product include promotional neckbands, peel-away coupons, resealable labels, see-through window graphics, and holographic foil enhancements to cold and hot foil stamping.

The pressure sensitive market is the largest category of the overall label market and represents a significant growth opportunity. Our strategy is to be a premier global supplier of pressure sensitive labels that demand high impact graphics or are otherwise technically challenging.

In-Mold Labels (IML):

The in-mold label process applies a label to a plastic container as the container is being formed in the mold cavity. The finished IML product is a finely detailed label that performs consistently well for plastic container manufacturers and adds marketing value and product security for consumer product companies.

Each component of the IML production process requires a special expertise for success. The components include the substrate (the base material for the label), inks, overcoats, varnishes and adhesives. We are unique in the industry in that we manufacture IMLs on rotogravure, flexographic and lithographic printing presses. There are several critical characteristics of a successful IML: the material needs a proper coefficient of friction so that the finished label is easily and consistently picked up and applied to the blow-molded container, the substrate must be able to hold the label’s inks, including metallics and fluorescents, overlay varnishes and adhesives and the material must be able to lay smoothly, without wrinkle or bulge, when applied to a very hot, just molded plastic container that will quickly shrink, along with the label, as its temperature falls. We continually search for alternate substrates to be used in the IML process in order to improve label performance and capabilities as well as to reduce substrate costs. Technical innovations in this area include the use of peel-away IML coupons, scented and holographic labels.

Heat Transfer Labels (HTL):

HTL are reverse printed and transferred from a special release liner onto the container using heat and pressure. The labels are a composition of inks and lacquers tailored to the customer’s specific needs. These labels are printed and then shipped to blow molders and/or contract decorators who transfer the labels to the containers. Once applied, the labels are permanently adhered to the container.

The graphics capabilities include fine vignettes, metallic and thermochromatic inks, as well as the patented “frost”, giving an acid-etch appearance.

Therimage™ is our pioneer heat transfer label technology developed primarily for applications involving plastic containers serving consumer markets in personal care, food and beverage, and home improvement products. The addition of the Clear ADvantage™ brand provides premium graphics on both glass and plastic containers enabling this decorating technology to achieve the highly sought after “no label” look for the health and beauty aid, beverage, personal care, household chemical and promotional markets. Our “ink only” and flameless HTL technology have increased our capabilities in this area. Flameless technology enables us to provide a solution to customers who want to remove open flames from their operations, which are normally required to pre-treat and post-treat containers for Therimage™ and Clear ADvantage™ products. Flameless technology has applications in all the aforementioned markets.

Glue-Applied Labels (Cut and Stack):

Glue-applied labels are adhered to containers using an adhesive applied during the labeling process. Available in roll-fed and sheeted formats, the labels are an attractive and cost-effective choice for high volume applications. These labels can be produced on a wide variety of substrates and accommodate a comprehensive range of embellishments including foil stamping, embossing, metallics and unique varnish finishes.

Our innovations within glue-applied labels include peel-away promotional labels, thermochromics, holographics and metalized films. We also offer promotional products such as scratch-off coupons, static-clings and tags.

Shrink Sleeve Labels:

Shrink sleeve labels are produced in colorful, cutting edge styles and materials. The labels are manufactured as sleeves, slid over glass or plastic bottles and then heated to conform precisely to the contours of the container. The 360-degree label and tamper resistant feature of the label are marketing advantages that many of our customers seek when choosing this label type.

The shrink sleeve market is a growing decorating technology as consumer product companies look for ways to differentiate their products. Several markets, such as the beverage market within the consumer goods industry, have adopted this decorating technology. Demand for this label solution in the food and personal care markets continues to grow and should broaden the sales opportunities for shrink sleeve labels.

Graphic Services:

We provide graphics and pre-press services for our customers at all of our manufacturing locations. These services include the conversion of customer digital files and artwork into proofs, production of print layouts and printing plates, and product mock ups and samples for market research.

As a result of these capabilities, we are able to go from concept to printed label, thus increasing our customers’ speed to market and further enhancing our value proposition.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Our product leadership group focuses on research and development, product commercialization and technical service support. The group includes chemical, packaging and field engineers who are responsible for developing and commercializing innovative label and application solutions. Technical service personnel also assist customers and manufacturers in improving container and label performance. The services provided by this group differentiate us from many of our competitors and drive our selection for the most challenging projects.

Our research and development expenditures were $4,751, $3,763$5,274, $5,520 and $3,494$4,619 in 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

SALES AND MARKETING

We provide a complete line of label solutions and a variety of technical and graphic services. Our vision is to be the premier global resource of decorating solutions. We sell to a broad range of consumer product, food & beverage, and wine & spiritspirits and healthcare companies located in North, Central and South America, Europe, China, Southeast Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa and China.Africa. Our sales strategy is a consultative selling approach. Our sales organization reviews the requirements of the container and offers a number of alternative decorating methods. Our customers view us as an expert source of materials, methods and technologies with the ability to offer the most cost effective solution.

We have continued to make progress in expanding our customer base and portfolio of products, services and manufacturing locations throughout the world. During 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, sales to major customers (those exceeding 10% of the Company’s net revenues in one or more of the periods presented) approximated 17%, 15%17% and 14%18%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated net revenues. All of these sales were made to theThe Procter & Gamble Company. The acquisition of Collotype International Holdings Pty. Ltd based in Adelaide, Australia diversified our customer base into new product markets, primarily wine & spirit, and new geographic regions, primarily Australia and South Africa. We continued the diversification into Europe with the acquisitions of Guidotti CentroStampa, Monroe Etiquette, La Cromografica and Warszawski Dom Handlowy, with manufacturing plants in Italy, France and Poland, inIn fiscal 2011 and 2012. The fiscal 2012 acquisition of York Label Group, with manufacturing plants in the United States, Canada and Chile, expanded sales with existing customers as well as added customers from a wide spectrum of markets including consumer products, food & beverage, pharmaceutical and wine & spirit. We2015, we entered the Scottish wine & spirit market with the acquisition of Labelgraphics (Holdings) Ltd. in fiscal 2013 and John Watson & Company Limited in fiscal 2014, both located in Glasgow, Scotland. We entered the

MexicanIrish label market with the acquisition of Flexo Print S.A. De C.V.Multiprint Labels Limited in Dublin, Ireland, which specializes in pressure sensitive labels for the wine & spirits and beverage markets, and New Era Packaging in Drogheda, Ireland, which specializes in labels for the healthcare, pharmaceutical and food industries. We also

entered the English label market in fiscal 2014,2015 with the acquisition of Multi Labels Ltd., which is a leading producerspecializes in premium alcoholic beverage labels for spirits and imported wine. In fiscal 2016, we entered the Southeast Asian label market with the acquisition of Super Label, which specializes in labels for home & personal care, food & beverage wine & spirit and pharmaceutical labels in Latin America.specialty consumer product industries. We also entered the Swiss labelSpanish wine & spirits market with the acquisition of Gern & Cie SA, a premier wine label producer located in Neuchatel, Switzerland, in fiscal 2014. The acquisition of DI-NA-CAL based near Cincinnati, Ohio in fiscal 2014 extended our position in the heat transfer label market and added new customers we can support2016 with a broad range of label technologies.start-up operating in La Rioja, Spain.

PRODUCTION AND QUALITY

To guarantee consistent quality results, all of our label decorating services are backed by aggressively implemented and administered quality programs and qualified technical support staff. Our certified ISO 9001 quality assurance program ensures excellence in every label.

Multi-Color’s comprehensive range of printing technologies facilitates our ability to respond quickly and effectively to changing customer needs. Our current printing technologies include flexographic, lithographic, rotogravure, letterpress and digital. Pre-press technology offerings include color separations, color management programs and in-house platemaking and tooling.

Our manufacturing operations involve complex processes and utilize factory automation to produce a consistent, high quality label. We employ state of the art technologies including digital platemaking and automated vision inspection systems complemented by a robust systemic quality management system.

EMPLOYEES

As of March 31, 2014,2017, we had approximately 3,2505,450 employees. Of the total employees, 48 are represented by the Graphics Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 77P in the U.S. The related labor contracts with this union expire in July 2015 and June 2017, respectively. In addition, 69approximately 60 employees are represented by the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers, International Union (USW) A.F.L.-C.I.O. Local 98 in Norwood, Ohio, and the related labor contract expiresexpiring in April 2017.March 2022. We also have three union agreements in Canada representing 47approximately 45 employees; two Teamsters/Graphic Communications Conference, Local Union 555Ms, which expireexpires in July 20162020 and the Workers Union of Les Graphiques Corpco (CSN), which expires in January 2015.August 2018. We consider our labor relations to be good and have not experienced any work stoppages during the previous decade. Our human resource and compensation systems have been developed to align our objectives with the goals of our shareholders.

RAW MATERIALS

Common to the printing industry, we purchase proprietary products from a number of raw material suppliers. To prevent potential disruptions to our manufacturing facilities, we have developed relationships with more than one supply source for each of our critical raw materials. Our raw material suppliers are major corporations with successful historical performance. Although we intend to prevent any long-term business interruption due to our inability to obtain raw materials, there could be short-term manufacturing disruptions during the customer qualification period for any new raw material source.

ACQUISITIONS

We are continually in pursuit of selective acquisitions that will contribute to our growth. We believe that acquisitions are a method of increasing our presence in existing markets, expanding into new markets, gaining new customers and product offerings and improving operating efficiencies through economies of scale. Through acquisitions, we intend to broaden our revenue stream by expanding our lines of innovative label solutions, offering a variety of technical and graphic services and fulfilling the specific needs and requirements of our customers. The printing and packaging industry is highly fragmented and offers many opportunities for acquisitions.

On AprilJuly 1, 2011, we2014, the Company acquired La Cromografica, an Italian wine label specialist locatedMultiprint Labels Limited (Multiprint) based in Florence, Italy. La CromograficaDublin, Ireland. Multiprint specializes in high quality winepressure sensitive labels for Italianthe wine & spirits and beverage markets in Ireland and the UK.

On January 5, 2015, the Company acquired Multi Labels Ltd., based in Daventry, near London, England, which specializes in premium winesalcoholic beverage labels for spirits and imported wine.

On February 2, 2015, the Company acquired New Era Packaging, which is based near Dublin, Ireland and specializes in labels for the healthcare, pharmaceutical and food industries.

On May 1, 2015, the Company acquired Mr. Labels in Brisbane, Queensland Australia, which provides furtherlabels primarily to food and beverage customers.

On May 4, 2015, the Company acquired Barat Group (Barat) based in Bordeaux, France. Barat operates four manufacturing facilities in Bordeaux and Burgundy, France, and the acquisition gives the Company access to the Italianlabel market in the Bordeaux wine label market.region and expands our presence in Burgundy.

On May 2, 2011, weAugust 11, 2015, the Company acquired 70% ownership90% of the shares of Super Label based in twoKuala Lumpur, Malaysia, which was publicly listed on the Malaysian stock exchange. During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2016, the Company acquired the remaining shares and delisted Super Label. The acquisition included an 80% controlling interest in the label operations in Latin America; oneIndonesia and a 60% controlling interest in Santiago, Chilecertain legal entities in Malaysia and China. During the other in Mendoza, Argentina. These label operations focus on providing premium labels to the expanding Latin American wine & spirit markets. In September 2011,third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company boughtacquired the regional partner’s 30% ownership interest inremaining shares of the two label operations in Latin America for 40 shares of Multi-Color common stock. As a result, MCC now owns 100% of the acquired labelIndonesia. Super Label has operations in ChileMalaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Argentina. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, our Santiago operations were merged into the Chilean operations acquired as part of the York Label Group acquisition.

On July 1, 2011, the Company acquired Warszawski Dom Handlowy (WDH), a consumer productsChina and spirit label company located in Warsaw, Poland. WDH supplies a number of large consumer products companies and international brand owners in home & personal care markets, consistent with MCC’s large customers in the U.S.

On October 3, 2011, the Company acquired York Label Group (York), including its joint venture in Santiago, Chile. York, which was headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, is a leader in theproduces home & personal care, food & beverage and wine & spiritspecialty consumer products labels. This acquisition expands our presence in China and gives us access to new label markets with manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Canada and Chile. The acquisition strengthened Multi-Color’s presence in its core markets through the combination of the Company’s existing customer relationships with York’s customer base.

On April 2, 2012, the Company acquired Labelgraphics (Holdings) Ltd. (Labelgraphics), a wine & spirit specialist located in Glasgow, Scotland. The acquisition expanded MCC’s global presence in the wine & spirit label market, particularly in the United Kingdom.

On April 2, 2013, the Company acquired Labelmakers Wine Division in Adelaide, Australia and Imprimerie Champenoise in the Champagne region of France.

On August 1, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of Flexo Print S.A. De C.V., based in Guadalajara, Mexico, a leading producer of home & personal care, food & beverage, wine & spirit and pharmaceutical labels in Latin America. The acquisition provides Multi-Color with significant growth opportunities in Mexico through our many common customers, technologies and suppliers.Southeast Asia.

On October 1, 2013,2015, the Company acquired Gern & Cie SA, the premier wine label producer in Switzerland,Supa Stik Labels (Supa Stik), which is located in Neuchatel, Switzerland. Gern has similar customer profilesPerth, West Australia and technologies as our existing French operations.services the local wine, food & beverage and healthcare label markets.

On October 1, 2013,January 4, 2016, the Company acquired John Watson & Company Limited, basedCashin Print and System Label, which are located in Glasgow, Scotland,Castlebar, Ireland and Roscommon, Ireland, respectively. The businesses supply multinational customers in Ireland, the leading glue-applied spirit label producerUnited Kingdom and Continental Europe and provide Multi-Color with the opportunity to supply a broader product range to a larger customer base, especially in the U.K. The business is ideally located for its key customers and is complementary to MCC’s existing business in Glasgow (formerly Labelgraphics), the leading pressure sensitive wine and spirit label producer in the same region.healthcare market.

On FebruaryJuly 1, 2014,2016, the Company acquired Italstereo Resin Labels S.r.l. (Italstereo), which is located near Lucca, Italy and specializes in producing pressure sensitive adhesive resin coated labels, seals and emblems.

On July 6, 2016, the assets of the DI-NA-CAL® label business, based near Cincinnati, Ohio, from Graphic Packaging International, Inc. DI-NA-CAL operates manufacturing facilities near Cincinnati, Ohio and Greensboro, North Carolina and provides decorative label solutions primarilyCompany acquired Industria Litografica Alessandrina S.r.l. (I.L.A.), which is located in the heat transfer label marketsPiedmont region of Italy and specializes in producing premium self-adhesive and wet glue labels primarily for homethe wine & personal carespirits market and also services the food industry.

On January 3, 2017, the Company acquired Graphix Labels and Packaging Pty Ltd. (Graphix). Graphix is located in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and specializes in producing labels for both the food & beverage through long-standing relationships with blue chip national and multi-national customers.wine & spirits markets. In January 2017, the Company acquired an additional 67.6% of the common shares of Gironde Imprimerie Publicité (GIP). The Company acquired 30% of GIP as part of the Barat acquisition extends Multi-Color’s positionin fiscal 2016. GIP is located in the heat transfer label marketBordeaux region of France and allows us to support a number of new customers with a broader range of label technologies.specializes in producing labels for the wine & spirits market.

See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for geographic information relating to our net revenues and long-lived assets. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding acquisitions.

COMPETITION

We have a large number of competitors in the pressure sensitive and glue-applied label markets and several competitors in each of the IML, shrink sleeve and HTL markets. Some of these competitors in the pressure sensitive and glue-applied label markets have greater financial and other resources than us. The competitors in IML, shrink sleeve and HTL markets are either private companies or subsidiaries of public companies and we cannot assess the financial resources of these organizations. We could be adversely affected should a competitor develop labels similar or technologically superior to our labels. We believe competition is principally dependent upon product performance, service, pricing, technical support and innovation.

PATENTS AND LICENSES

We own a number of patents and patent applications in the U.S., Europe, Australia and South Africa that relate to the products and services we offer to our customers. Although these patents are important to us, we are not dependent upon any one patent. We believe that these patents, collectively, along with our ability to be a single source provider of many packaging needs, provide us with a competitive advantage over our competition. The expiration or unenforceability of any one of our patents would not have a material adverse effect on us.

REGULATION

Our operations are subject to regulation by federal, state and foreign (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, France, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, Switzerland, and South Africa) environmental protection agencies. To ensure ongoing compliance with these requirements, we have implemented an internal compliance program. Additionally, we continue to make capital investments to maintain compliance with these environmental regulations and to improve our existing equipment. However, there can be no assurances that these regulations will not require expenditures beyond those that are currently anticipated.

In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration regulates the raw materials used in labels for various products. These regulations apply to the consumer product companies for which we produce labels. We use materials specified by the consumer product companies in producing labels.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

(In thousands)thousands, except for statistical data)

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the following factors could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows or future results. Any one of these factors could cause the Company’s actual results to vary materially from recent results or from anticipated future results. The risks described below are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Raw material cost increases or shortages could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

As a member of the print industry, our sales and profitability are dependent upon the availability and cost of various raw materials, which are subject to price fluctuations, and the ability to control the fluctuating costs of raw materials, pass on any price increases to our customers or find suitable alternative suppliers. If we are unable to effectively manage these costs or improve our operating efficiencies, or if adverse developments arise concerning certain key raw material vendors, such as disruptions in their productions or lack of

availability of the raw materials we need from them, or our relationships with them, our profit margin may decline, especially if the inflationary conditions that have occurred in these markets in the recent past continue to occur.

We face risks related to interruption of our operations and lack of redundancy.

Our production facilities, websites, transaction processing systems, network infrastructure, supply chain and customer service operations may be vulnerable to interruptions, and we do not have redundancies in all cases to carry on these operations in the event of an interruption. Specifically, the long-term shutdown of our printing presses or malfunctions experienced with our presses could negatively impact our ability to fulfill customers’ orders and on-time delivery needs and adversely impact our operating results and cash flows. We have not identified alternatives to all of our facilities, systems, supply chains and infrastructure, including production, to serve us in the event of an interruption, and if we were to find alternatives, they may not be able to meet our requirements on commercially acceptable terms or at all. In addition, we are dependent in part on third parties for the implementation and maintenance of certain aspects of our communications and production systems, and because many of the causes of system interruptions or interruptions of the production process may be outside of our control, we may not be able to remedy such interruptions in a timely manner, or at all. Any interruptions that cause any of our websites to be unavailable, reduce our order fulfillment performance or interfere with our manufacturing, technology or customer service operations could result in lost revenue, increased costs, negative publicity, damage to our reputation and brand, and an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Building redundancies into our infrastructure, systems and supply chain to mitigate these risks may require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources, in some cases before the volume of our business increases with no assurance that our revenues will increase.

Various laws and governmental regulations applicable to a manufacturer or distributor of consumer products may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, provincial, local and foreign laws and regulations, including laws and regulations with respect to labor and employment, product safety, including regulations enforced by the United States Consumer Products Safety Commission, import and export activities, the Internet and e-commerce, antitrust issues, taxes, chemical usage, air emissions, wastewater and storm water discharges and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials, including hazardous materials. We routinely incur costs in complying with these regulations and, if we fail to comply, could incur significant penalties.

Although we believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because legal requirements frequently change and are subject to interpretation, we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the consequences of non-compliance with these requirements, or the affecteffect on our operations, any of which may be significant. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, or prohibitions on importing or exporting. A failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or concerns about product safety, also may lead to a recall or post-manufacture repair of selected products, resulting in the rejection of our products by our customers and consumers, lost sales, increased customer service and support costs, and costly litigation. In addition, failure to comply with environmental requirements could require us to shut down one or more of our facilities. There is risk that any claims or liabilities, including product liability claims, relating to such noncompliance may exceed, or fall outside the scope of, our insurance coverage. Laws and regulations at the state, federal and international levels frequently change and the cost of compliance cannot be precisely estimated. Any changes in regulations, the imposition of additional regulations, or the enactment of any new governmental legislation that impacts employment/labor, trade, health care, tax, environmental or other business issues could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to meet our customer expectations or to continue to develop and introduce new services and technologies successfully, our competitive positioning and our ability to grow our business could be harmed.

Quality issues discovered in our current products and services after shipment or performance may cause additional shipping costs, possible discounts or refunds, and potential loss of future sales, while issues discovered prior to shipping may cause delays and potentially cancelled orders. These quality issues could adversely affect our profitability as well as negatively impact our reputation. In addition, in order to remain competitive, we must continually invest in new technologies that will enable us to meet the evolving demands of our customers. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in the introduction, marketing and adoption of any of our new products or services, or that we will develop and introduce in a timely manner innovative products and services that satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop new services and products and introduce them successfully could harm our competitive position and our ability to grow our business, and our revenues and operating results could suffer.

New developments in packaging could affect our profitability.

The packaging industry is constantly evolving based on both industry-member and consumer preferences, and to the extent that any such new developments result in a decrease in the utilization of labels, our profitability could be adversely affected.

We must be able to continue to effectively manage our growth, including our recent acquisitions, and to execute our long-term growth strategy.

We have experienced significant and steady growth over the last several years. Our growth, in particular our recent acquisitions, combined with the geographical separation of our operations, has placed, and will continue to place, a strain on our management, administrative and operational infrastructure. Our ability to manage our operations and anticipated growth will require us to continue to refine our operational, financial and management controls, human resource policies, reporting systems and procedures in the locations in which we operate. In addition, our expectations regarding the earnings, operating cash flow, capital expenditures and liabilities resulting from acquisitions

recently completed are based on information currently available to us and may prove to be incorrect. We may not be able to implement improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. If we are unable to realize any of the anticipated benefits of an acquisition or manage expected future expansion,

or if our long-term growth strategy is not successful, our ability to provide a high-quality customer experience could be harmed, which would damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and results of operations. In addition, projections made by us in connection with forming our long-term growth strategy are inherently uncertain and based on assumptions and judgments by management that may be flawed or based on information about our business and markets that may change in the future, many of which are beyond our reasonable control. These and various other factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from our projections.

We are subject to risks associated with our international operations, including compliance with applicable U.S. and foreign anti-corruption laws and regulations such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and other applicable anti-corruption laws, which may increase the cost of doing business in international jurisdictions.

We have operations in North, Central and South America, Europe, China, Southeast Asia, Australia New Zealand,and South Africa and China and we intend to continue expansion of our international operations. As a result, our business is exposed to risks inherent in foreign operations. If we fail to adequately address the challenges and risks associated with our international expansion and acquisition strategy, we may encounter difficulties implementing our strategy, which could impede our growth or harm our operating results. These risks, which can vary substantially by jurisdiction, include the difficulties associated with managing an organization with operations in multiple countries, compliance with differing laws and regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 and local laws prohibiting payments to government officials and other corrupt practices, tax laws, regulations and rates), enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through foreign legal systems. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies, particularly as we expand our operations through organic growth and acquisitions. Any such violations could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including material fines or prohibitions on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries, and could also materially damage our reputation, brand, international expansion efforts, business and operating results. Additional risks include the potential for restrictive actions by foreign governments, changes in economic conditions in each market, foreign customers who may have longer payment cycles than customers in the United States, the impact of economic, political and social instability of those countries in which we operate and acts of nature, such as typhoons, tsunamis, or earthquakes. The overall volatility of the economic environment has increased the risk of disruption and losses resulting from hyper-inflation, currency devaluation and tax or regulatory changes in certain countries in which we have operations. Approximately 37%45% of our sales were derived from our foreign operations (based on the country from which the product was shipped) during fiscal 2014.2017.

We also face the challenges and uncertainties associated with operating in developing markets such as China, which may subject us to a relatively high risk of political and social instability and economic volatility, all of which are enhanced, in many cases, by uncertainties as to how local law is applied and enforced, including in areas most relevant to commercial transactions and foreign investment.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our revenue, cash flows and financial results.

Because we conduct a significant portion of our business outside the United States, our revenues and earnings and the value of our foreign net assets are affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may favorably or adversely affect reported earnings and net assets. Currency exchange rates fluctuate in response to, among other things, changes in local, regional or global economic conditions, the imposition of currency exchange restrictions and unexpected changes in regulatory or taxation environments. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may affect the Company’s operating performance by impacting revenues and expenses outside of the United States due to fluctuations in currencies other than the U.S. dollar or where the Company translates into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes the assets and liabilities of its foreign operations conducted in local currencies.

We have risks related to continued uncertain global economic conditions and volatility in the credit markets.

During the past several years,At times, domestic and international financial markets have experienced extreme disruption, including, among other things, extreme volatility in stock prices and severely diminished liquidity and credit availability. These developments and the related severe domestic and international economic downturn, have continued to adversely impact our business and financial condition in a number of ways, including effects beyond those that were experienced in previous recessions in the United States and foreign economies.

Global economic conditions also affect our customers’ businesses and the markets they serve, as well as our suppliers. Because a significant part of our business relies on our customers’ spending, a prolonged downturn in the global economy and an uncertain economic outlook has and could further reduce the demand for printing and related services that we provide to these customers. Economic weakness and constrained advertising spending have resulted, and may in the future result, in decreased revenue, operating margin, earnings and growth rates and difficulty in managing inventory levels and collecting accounts receivable. In particular, our exposure to certain industries currently experiencing financial difficulties and certain financially troubled customers could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. The current restrictions in financial markets and the severe prolonged economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for operations and purchases and to perform their obligations under agreements with us. We also have experienced, and expect to experience in the future, operating margin declines in certain businesses, reflecting the effect of items such as competitive pricing pressures and inventory write-downs. Economic downturns may also result in restructuring actions and associated expenses and impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles. Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments.

Finally, economic downturns may affect one or more of our lenders’ ability to fund future draws on our Credit Facility or our ability to access the capital markets or obtain new financing arrangements that are favorable to us. In such an event, our liquidity could be severely constrained with an adverse impact on our ability to operate our businesses. Our ability to meet the financial covenants in the Credit Facility may also be affected by events beyond our control, including a further deterioration of current economic and industry conditions, which

could negatively affect our earnings. If it is determined we are not in compliance with these financial covenants, the

lenders under the Credit Facility will be entitled to take certain actions, including acceleration of all amounts due under the facility. If the lenders take such action, we may be forced to amend the terms of the credit agreement, obtain a waiver or find alternative sources of capital. Obtaining new financing arrangements or amending our existing one may result in significantly higher fees and ongoing interest costs as compared to those in our current arrangement.

Competition in our industry could limit our ability to retain current customers and attract new customers.

The markets for our products and services are highly competitive.competitive and constantly evolving. We compete primarily based on the level and quality of customer service, technological leadership, product performance and price and the inability to successfully overcome competition in our business could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than us. We could face competitive pressure as a result of any of the following: our ability to continue to improve our product and service offerings and developkeep pace with and integrate technological advances;advances and industry evolutions; new products developed by our competitors that are of superior quality, fit our customers’ needs better or have lower prices; patents obtained or developed by competitors; consolidation of our competitors; pricing pressures; loss of proprietary supplies of certain materials.materials; decrease in the utilization of labels. The inability to successfully identify, develop and sell new or improved products and to overcome competition in our business could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows.

Our business growth strategy involves the potential for significant acquisitions, which involve risks and difficulties in integrating potential acquisitions and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

All acquisitions involve inherent uncertainties, which may include, among other things, our ability to:

 

successfully identify targets for acquisition;

 

negotiate reasonable terms;

 

properly perform due diligence and determine all the significant risks associated with a particular acquisition;

 

properly evaluate target company management capabilities; and

 

successfully transition the acquired company into our business and achieve the desired performance.

We may acquire businesses with unknown liabilities, contingent liabilities, or internal control deficiencies. We have plans and procedures to conduct reviews of potential acquisition candidates for compliance with applicable regulations and laws prior to acquisition. Despite these efforts, realization of any of these liabilities or deficiencies may increase our expenses, adversely affect our financial position through the initiation, pendency or outcome of litigation or otherwise, or cause us to fail to meet our public financial reporting obligations.

We have a history of making acquisitions and, over the past several years, have invested, and in the future may continue to invest, a substantial amount of capital in acquisitions. We continue to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities to support, strengthen and grow our business. Although we have completed many acquisitions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to locate suitable acquisition candidates, acquire possible acquisition candidates, acquire such candidates on commercially reasonable terms, or integrate acquired businesses successfully in the future. In addition, any governmental review or investigation of our proposed acquisitions, such as by the Federal Trade Commission, may impede, limit or prevent us from proceeding with an acquisition. Future acquisitions may require us to incur additional debt and contingent liabilities, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The process of integrating acquired businesses into our existing operations may result in operating, contract and supply chain difficulties, such as the failure to retain customers or management personnel. Such difficulties may divert significant financial, operational and managerial resources from our existing operations, and make it more difficult to achieve our operating and strategic objectives.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of, or be able to successfully integrate, our recent acquisitions.

Our expectations regarding the earnings, operating cash flow, capital expenditures and liabilities resulting from acquisitions recently completed are based on information currently available to us and may prove to be incorrect. Our inability to realize any of the anticipated benefits of an acquisition and to successfully integrate the acquired assets into our existing business will have an adverse effect on our financial condition including potential impairment of goodwill and other assets.

We have a significant amount of goodwill and other intangible assets on our balance sheet that are subject to periodic impairment evaluations. In 2014, we wrote downevaluations; an impairment of our goodwill and weor other intangible assets may have similar charges in the future, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

When we acquire a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition may be allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price which is allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible assets acquired. As of March 31, 2014,2017, we had $547,633$581,770 of goodwill and intangible assets, the value of which depends on a number of factors, including earnings growth, market capitalization and the overall success of our business. Accounting standards require us to test goodwill for impairment annually, and more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may exist.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $13,475 related to goodwill in our Latin America Wine and Spirit reporting unit. There can be no assurance that future reviews of our goodwill and other intangible assets will not result in additional impairment charges. Although it does not affect cash flow, an impairment charge does have the effect of decreasing our

earnings, assets and shareholders’ equity. Future events may occur that could adversely affect the value of our assets and require future impairment charges. Such events may include, but are not limited to, poor operating results, strategic decisions made in response to changes in economic and competitive conditions, the impact of a deteriorating economic environment and decreases in our market capitalization due to a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

During the early years of an acquisition, the risk of impairment to goodwill and intangible assets is naturally higher. This is because the fair values of these assets align very closely with what we recently paid to acquire the reporting units to which these assets are assigned. This

means the difference between the carrying value of the reporting unit and its fair value (typically referred to as “headroom”) is naturally smaller at the time of acquisition. Until this headroom grows over time (due to business growth or lower carrying value of the reporting unit due to natural amortization, etc.), a relatively small decrease in reporting unit fair value can trigger an impairment. That fair value is affected by actual business performance but is also determined by the market (usually reflected in the value of our common stock). As a consequence, sometimes even with favorable business performance, the market alone can drive an impairment condition if general business valuations decline significantly. When impairment charges are triggered, they tend to be material due to the sheer size of the assets involved.

Our debt instruments impose operating and financial restrictions on us and, in the event of a default, would have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

As of March 31, 2014,2017, our consolidated indebtedness, including current maturities of long-term indebtedness, was $478,202,$481,501, which could have important consequences including the following:

 

Increasing our vulnerability to generalglobal economic and industry conditions;

 

Requiring a substantial portion of cash flows from operating activities to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and, as a result, reducing our ability to use our cash flows to fund our operations and capital expenditures, pay dividends, capitalize on future business opportunities and expand our business;

 

Exposing us to the risk of increased interest expense as certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest;

 

Limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, additional acquisitions and other business purposes; and

 

Limiting our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and react to competitive pressures.

We may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our credit agreements. If new indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

Our credit agreementsdebt instruments contain covenants that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain various covenants that may adversely affect our ability to operate our business. Among other things, these covenants limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness; make certain investments or loans, transfer or sell certain assets, create or permit liens on assets and consolidate, merge, sell or otherwiseindebtedness, dispose of allassets, incur guarantee obligations, make restricted payments, create liens, make equity or substantially all of our assets.debt investments, engage in mergers, change the business conducted by the Company and its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The agreements governing our indebtedness also require us to maintain (i) a minimummaximum consolidated net worth,senior secured leverage ratio, (ii) a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, which steps down incrementally during the term of the agreements;ratio; and (iii) a minimum consolidated interest charge coverage ratio.

Our ability to meet the financial ratios and tests contained in our credit agreements and other debt arrangements, and otherwise comply with debt covenants may be affected by various events, including those that may be beyond our control. Accordingly, we may not be able to continue to meet those ratios, tests and covenants. A significant breach of any of these covenants, ratios, tests or restrictions, as applicable, could result in an event of default under our debt arrangements, which would allow our lenders to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable. If the lenders were to accelerate the payment of our indebtedness, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the indebtedness and any other indebtedness that would become due as a result of any acceleration. Further, as a result of any breach and during any cure period or negotiations to resolve a breach or expected breach, our lenders may refuse to make further loans, which would materially affect our liquidity and results of operations.

In the event we were to fall out of compliance with one or more of our debt covenants in the future, we may not be successful in amending our debt arrangements or obtaining waivers for any such non-compliance. Even if we are successful in entering into an amendment or waiver, we could incur substantial costs in doing so. It is also possible that any amendments to our Credit Facilitydebt instruments or any restructured Credit Facilitydebt could impose covenants and financial ratios more restrictive than under our current facility. Any of the foregoing events could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain the necessary waivers or amendments on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

We rely on several large customers and the loss of one of these customers would have a material adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014,2017, one customer accounted for approximately 17% of our consolidated sales and our top twenty-five customers accounted for 55%approximately 48% of our consolidated sales. While we maintain sales contracts with certain of our largest customers, such contracts do not impose minimum purchase or volume requirements and these contracts require renewal on a regular basis in the ordinary course of business. Any termination of a business relationship with, or a significant sustained reduction in business received

from, one or more of our largest customers could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. The volume and type of services we provide all of our customers may vary from year to year and could be reduced if a customer were to change its outsourcing or print procurement strategy. We cannot guarantee that these contracts will be successfully renewed in the future. The loss or substantial reduction in business of any of our major customers could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows.

Our ability to develop and market new products is critical for maintaining growth.

Our success depends upon the timely introduction of new products as well as technological improvements to our current products. Research and development relies on innovation and requires anticipation of market trends. Accordingly, our ability to grow will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological advances, industry evolutions and customer expectations on a continuing basis and to integrate available technologies and provide additional services commensurate with our customers’ needs. Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to successfully identify, develop and sell new or improved products or keep pace with relevant technological and industry changes or if the technologies or business strategies that we adopt do not receive widespread market acceptance.

We are highly dependent on information technology. If our systems fail or are unreliable our operations may be adversely impacted.

The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology infrastructure and our management information systems. In addition, production technology in the printing industry has continued to evolve specifically related to the pre-press component of production. Our information technology infrastructure and/or our management information systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural or man-made disasters, terrorist attacks, computer viruses or hackers, power loss, or other computer systems, Internet telecommunications or data network failures. Any significant breakdown, virus or destruction could negatively impact our business. We also periodically upgrade and install new systems, which if installed or programmed incorrectly, could cause significant disruptions. If a disruption occurs, we could incur losses and costs for interruption of our operations.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that, if not properly corrected, could materially adversely affect our operations and result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

As described in “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures,” we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of March 31, 2014 because material weaknesses existed in our internal control over financial reporting related to an insufficient complement of corporate accounting and finance personnel to design and execute an effective system of internal control, general information technology controls intended to restrict access to applications and data, and the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over the accounting for other items. If we are unable to remediate our material weaknesses in a timely manner, we may be unable to provide holders of our securities with required financial information in a timely and reliable manner and we may incorrectly report financial information. Either of these events could have a material adverse effect on our operations, investor, supplier and customer confidence in our reported financial information and/or the trading price of our common stock.

We are involved on an ongoing basis in claims, lawsuits, and governmental proceedings relating to our operations, including environmental, commercial transactions, and other matters.

The ultimate outcome of these claims, lawsuits, and governmental proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, but could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. We are also involved in other possible claims, including product and general liability, workers compensation, auto liability, and employment-related matters, some of which may be of a material nature or may be resolved in a manner that has a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. While we maintain insurance for certain of these exposures, the policies in place are high-deductible policies resulting in our assuming exposure for a layer of coverage with respect to such claims. For a more detailed discussion of our asserted claims, see Item 3 of Part I of this Form 10-K.

We cannot predict our future capital needs and any limits on our ability to raise capital in the future could prevent further growth.

We may in the future be required to raise capital through public or private financing or other arrangements. Such financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could harm our business. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and could reduce our profitability. In addition, we may experience operational difficulties and delays due to working capital restrictions. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may have to delay or scale back our growth plans and may not be able to effectively manage competitive pressures.

We depend on key personnel, and we may not be able to operate and grow our business effectively if we lose their services or are unable to attract qualified personnel in the future.

We are dependent upon the efforts of our senior management team. The success of our business is heavily dependent on our ability to retain our current management and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense, and we may not be able to retain our personnel. We have not entered into employment agreements with our key personnel, other than with our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and, effective April 1, 2014, our Chief Operating Officers,Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and these individuals may not continue in their present capacity with us for any particular period of time. Outside of the implementation of succession plans and executive transitions done in the normal course of business, the loss of the services of one or more members of our senior

management team could require the remaining executive officers to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement and would disrupt our business and impede our ability to execute our business strategy. Any inability to find a replacement for a departing executive officer on a timely basis could adversely affect our ability to operate and grow our business.

If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, we may lose some of our competitive advantage.

Our success is determined in part by our ability to obtain United States and foreign patent protection for our technology and to preserve our trade secrets. Our ability to compete and the ability of our business to grow could suffer if our intellectual property rights are not adequately protected. There can be no assurance that our patent applications will result in patents being issued or that current or additional patents will afford protection against competitors. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret protection and contractual rights to establish and protect our intellectual property. Failure of our patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret protection, non-disclosure agreements and other measures to provide protection of our technology and our intellectual property rights could enable our competitors to more effectively compete with us and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our trade secrets and proprietary know-how may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by others. No guarantee can be given that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or techniques, or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology.

We could become involved in intellectual property litigation, which is costly and could cause us to lose our intellectual property rights or subject us to liability.

Although we have received patents with respect to certain technologies of ours, there can be no assurance that these patents will afford us any meaningful protection. Although we believe that our use of the technology and products we developed and other trade secrets used in our operations do not infringe upon the rights of others, our use of the technology and trade secrets we developed may infringe upon the patents or intellectual property rights of others. In the event of infringement, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to obtain a license or modify aspects of the technology and trade secrets we developed or refrain from using the same. We may not have the necessary financial resources to defend an infringement claim made against us or be able to successfully terminate any infringement in a timely manner, upon acceptable terms and conditions or at all. Moreover, if the patents, technology or trade secrets we developed or use in our business are deemed to infringe upon the rights of others, we could, under certain circumstances, become liable for damages, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our financial condition. As we continue to market our products, we could encounter patent barriers that are not known today. Furthermore, third parties may assert that our intellectual property rights are invalid, which could result

in significant expenditures by us to refute such assertions. If we become involved in litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights, be subject to damages and incur substantial unexpected operating expenses. Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming, even if the claims are subsequently proven unfounded, and could divert management’s attention from our business. If there is a successful claim of infringement, we may not be able to develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or license agreements on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unsuccessful in defending claims that our intellectual property rights are invalid, we may not be able to enter into royalty or license agreements on acceptable terms, if at all. This could prohibit us from providing our products and services to customers, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our financial condition.

Employee benefit costs, including increasing health care costs for our employees may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We seek to provide competitive employee benefit programs to our employees. Employee benefit costs, such as U.S. healthcare costs of our eligible and participating employees, may increase significantly at a rate that is difficult to forecast, in part because we are unable to determine the impact that newly enacted U.S. federal healthcare legislation may have on our employer-sponsored medical plans. Higher employee benefit costs could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We provide health care and other benefits to our employees. In recent years, costs for health care have increased more rapidly than general inflation in the U.S. economy. If this trend in health care costs continues, our cost to provide such benefits could increase, adversely impacting our profitability. Changes to health care regulations in the U.S. may also increase the cost to us of providing such benefits.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

Our operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:

 

timing of the completion of particular projects or orders;

 

material reduction, postponement or cancellation of major projects, or the loss of a major client;

 

timing and amount of new business;

 

differences in order flows;

sensitivity to the effects of changing economic conditions on our clients’ businesses;

 

the strength of the consumer products industry;

 

the relative mix of different types of work with differing margins;

 

costs relating to expansion or reduction of operations, including costs to integrate current and any future acquisitions;

 

changes in interest costs, foreign currency exchange rates and tax rates; and

 

costs associated with compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Because of this, we may be unable to adjust spending on fixed costs, such as building and equipment leases, depreciation and personnel costs, quickly enough to offset any revenue shortfall and our operating results could be adversely affected. Due to these factors or other unanticipated events, our financial and operating results in any one quarter may not be a reliable indicator of our future performance.

The price for our common stock can be volatile and unpredictable.

The market price of our common stock can be volatile and may experience broad fluctuations over short periods of time. The market price of our common stock may continue to experience strong fluctuations due to unexpected events, variations in our operating results, analysts’ earnings estimates or investors’ expectations concerning our future results and our business generally. In addition, regardless of our actual operating performance, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate due to broader market and industry factors.

If we fail to comply with U.S. public company reporting obligations or to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

As a U.S. public company, we are required to comply with the periodic reporting obligations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including preparing annual reports, quarterly reports and current reports. We are also subject to certain of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Dodd-Frank Act which, among other things, require enhanced disclosure of business, financial, compensation and governance information. Our failure to prepare and disclose this information in a timely manner could subject us to penalties under federal securities laws, expose us to lawsuits, and restrict our ability to access financing. We currently have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we are in the process of remediating, and we may identify areas requiring improvement with respect to our internal control over financial reporting, which may require us to design enhanced processes and controls to address any additional issues identified. This could result in significant delays and cost to us and require us to divert substantial resources, including management time, from other activities. If we fail to remediate our material weaknesses or to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent fraud.

Certain provisions of Ohio law and our Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations may deter takeover attempts, which may limit the opportunity of our shareholders to sell their shares at a favorable price, and may make it more difficult for our shareholders to remove our Board of Directors and management.management.

Provisions in our Amended Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Code of Regulations may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include the following:

 

advance notice requirements for shareholders proposals and nominations;

 

the right of the board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or due to the resignation or departure of an existing board member;

 

the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of shareholders to elect director candidates; and

 

limitations on the removal of directors.

In addition, because we are incorporated in Ohio, we are governed by the provisions of Section 1704 of the Ohio Revised Code. These provisions may prohibit large shareholders, particularly those owning 10% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us. These provisions in our Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations and under Ohio law could discourage potential takeover attempts, could reduce the price that investors are willing to pay for our common shares in the future and could potentially result in the market price being lower than it would without these provisions.

Although no preferred shares were outstanding as of March 31, 20142017 and although we have no present plans to issue any preferred shares, our Articles of Incorporation authorize the Board of Directors to issue up to 1,000 preferred shares. The preferred shares may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which will be determined at the time of issuance by our Board of Directors without further action by the shareholders. These terms may include voting rights, including the right to vote as a series on particular matters, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of any

preferred shares could diminish the rights of holders of our common shares and, therefore, could reduce the value of our common shares. In addition, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred shares could be used to restrict our ability to merge with, or sell assets to, a third party. The ability of our Board of Directors to issue preferred shares and the foregoing anti-takeover provisions may prevent or frustrate attempts by a third party to acquire control of the Company, even if some of our shareholders consider such change of control to be beneficial.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

(In thousands, except for statistical data)

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

As of March 31, 2014,2017, the Company owned 9 manufacturing facilities in the U.S., France, South Africa, and Scotland and leased 22the following 47 manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, France, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Scotland and Switzerland.

See below for a listing of our 31 facilities at March 31, 2014:

facilities:

Location

  Approximate
Square Feet
   Owned/
Leased
 

United States:

    

Napa, California

   52,000Leased

Sonoma, California

47,500150,125    Leased 

Scottsburg, Indiana

   120,500    Owned 

Norway, Michigan

133,000Owned

Asheville, North Carolina

   53,500Leased

Greensboro, North Carolina

51,120    Leased 

Omaha, Nebraska

   31,000    Leased 

Batavia, Ohio

   247,830277,730    Owned 

Norwood, Ohio

   313,322    Owned 

York, Pennsylvania

   160,000    Leased 

Chesapeake, Virginia

   49,885    Leased 

Green Bay, Wisconsin

   39,600    Owned 

Watertown, Wisconsin

63,300Owned

International:

    

Mendoza, Argentina

   10,273    Leased 

Adelaide, Australia

   65,246    Leased 

Brisbane, Australia

   42,744    Leased 

Barossa, Australia

   25,306    Leased 

Griffith, Australia

   21,775    Leased 

Melbourne, Australia

21,653Leased

Perth, Australia

22,184Leased

Montreal, Canada

   51,650    Leased 

Santiago, Chile

   150,610    Leased 

Guangzhou, China (2)

   43,05680,191    Leased

Daventry, England

34,059Owned / Leased 

Dormans, France

   16,145    Owned 

Libourne, France

39,934Owned

Mérignac, France

30,462Leased

Montagny, France

   20,000    Leased

Port-Sainte-Foy, France

22,690Leased

Reyrieux, France

48,868Leased

Saint Emilion, France

35,112Leased

Jakarta, Indonesia

27,771Owned

Castlebar, Ireland

42,722Leased

Drogheda, Ireland

53,529Owned

Roscommon, Ireland

12,109Leased

Alessandria, Italy

29,500Owned 

Florence, Italy

   23,681    Leased 

Lucca, Italy (2)

   119,479134,179    Leased

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2)

67,951Owned / Leased

Penang, Malaysia

70,808Owned 

Guadalajara, Mexico

   82,990Leased

Location

Approximate
Square Feet
Owned/Leased

International continued:

Manila, Philippines

21,722    Leased 

Warsaw, Poland

   61,657    Leased 

Glasgow, Scotland

   43,196    Owned 

Glasgow, Scotland

29,562Leased

Paarl, South Africa

   114,343    Owned 

Haro, Spain

21,528Leased

Bevaix, Switzerland

   15,069    Leased

Bangkok, Thailand

50,470Owned 

All of the Company’s properties are in good condition, well maintained and adequate for our intended uses.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company began the process to consolidate our two manufacturing facilities located in Glasgow, Scotland into one facility. The transition was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

On October 16, 2013,January 19, 2016, the Company announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in El Dorado Hills,Sonoma, California, into the Napa, California facility. The transition was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In connection with the closure of the El Dorado Hills facility, we terminated our lease agreement as of March 31, 2014.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company consolidated the two operations located in Montreal, Canada into one manufacturing facility.2017.

In January 2012,On November 1, 2015, the Company announced plans to consolidate itsour manufacturing facility located in Kansas City, MissouriDublin, Ireland into our other existing facilities. In September 2012, the Kansas City facilityDrogheda, Ireland facility. The consolidation was sold for net proceedssubstantially completed in the first quarter of $625.fiscal 2017.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

(In thousands)

The Company reported previously that it was a party in a case styledDLJ South American Partners, L.P. (“DLJ”) v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al., Case No. C.A. No. 7417-CS in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “DLJ Litigation”). In a complaint filed on April 13, 2012, DLJ alleged that the Company failed to make certain payments required by the Merger and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) entered into by the Company with Adhesion Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, DLJ, and Diamond Castle Partners IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, (“Diamond Castle”), pursuant to which the Company acquired York Label Group. An affiliate of Diamond Castle nominated Ari J. Benacerraf and Simon T. Roberts for election to the Board of Directors of the Company at its 2012 and 2013 Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Mr. Benacerraf and Mr. Roberts are current members of the Company’s Board.

DLJ sought the payment of $6,939 and interest, legal fees and other equitable relief. On May 18, 2012, the Company filed an answer, counterclaim and third party complaint asserting various causes of action against DLJ, Diamond Castle and affiliated entities arising out of their breaches of the Merger Agreement and other actions.

On January 23, 2014 the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release resolving all claims made in the litigation (the “Settlement Agreement”). The parties agreed to pay certain consideration under the Settlement Agreement, including the release of certain shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company from the escrow established pursuant to the Merger Agreement. On January 23, 2014 the parties filed a Stipulated Final Entry of Dismissal, with Prejudice, with the Delaware Court of Chancery. The settlement and release reflect a compromise regarding disputed claims and are not to be construed as an admission of liability or fault by any of the parties.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is also subject to various legal claims and contingencies that arise out of the normal course of business, including claims related to commercial transactions, product liability, health and safety, taxes, environmental employee-relatedmatters, employee matters and other matters. Litigation is subject to numerous uncertainties and the outcome of individual claims and contingencies is not predictable. It is possible that some legal matters for which reserves have or have not been established could result in an unfavorable outcome for the Company and any such unfavorable outcome could be of a material nature or have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.Company.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not ApplicableApplicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our shares trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol LABL. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of our common stock (“Common Stock”) as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market during fiscal years 20142017 and 2013.2016. Our stock is thinly traded and accordingly, the prices below may not be indicative of prices at which a large number of shares can be traded or reflective of prices that would prevail in a more active market.

 

Quarter Ended

  High   Low   Dividend Per Share 

March 31, 2014

  $37.15    $31.10    $0.05  

December 31, 2013

  $38.02    $32.50    $0.05  

September 30, 2013

  $35.06    $31.33    $0.05  

June 30, 2013

  $30.76    $24.97    $0.05  

March 31, 2013

  $25.79    $22.87    $0.05  

December 31, 2012

  $24.25    $20.95    $0.05  

September 30, 2012

  $24.00    $18.79    $0.05  

June 30, 2012

  $23.72    $18.11    $0.05  

Quarter Ended

  High   Low   Dividend Per Share 

March 31, 2017

  $81.15   $69.55   $0.05 

December 31, 2016

  $78.90   $63.80   $0.05 

September 30, 2016

  $69.57   $62.41   $0.05 

June 30, 2016

  $64.05   $50.38   $0.05 

March 31, 2016

  $63.03   $41.14   $0.05 

December 31, 2015

  $79.38   $58.59   $0.05 

September 30, 2015

  $76.49   $61.91   $0.05 

June 30, 2015

  $69.83   $57.75   $0.05 

As of May 31, 2014,April 30, 2017, there were approximately 300240 shareholders of record of the Common Stock.

Beginning in and since the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, we have paid a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per common share.

FIVE YEAR PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following performance graph compares Multi-Color’s cumulative annual total shareholder return from March 31, 20092012 through March 31, 2014,2017, to that of the NASDAQ Market Index, a broad market index, and the Morningstar Packaging & Containers Index (“Morningstar Packaging & Containers”), an index of approximately 4958 printing and packaging industry peer companies. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock and each index was $100 on March 31, 2009,2012, and that all dividends were reinvested. Stock price performances shown in the graph are not indicative of future price performances.

 

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON MAR. 31, 2012

ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED

FISCAL YEAR ENDING MAR. 31, 2017

 

Company/Market/Peer Group  3/31/2009   3/31/2010   3/31/2011   3/31/2012   3/31/2013   3/31/2014   3/31/2012   3/31/2013   3/31/2014   3/31/2015   3/31/2016   3/31/2017 

Multi-Color Corporation

  $100.00    $99.57    $170.06    $191.02    $220.92    $301.67    $100.00   $115.65   $157.93   $314.20   $242.63   $323.85 

NASDAQ Market Index

  $100.00    $158.32    $185.32    $208.14    $223.01    $290.32    $100.00   $107.14   $139.48   $164.75   $165.66   $203.56 

Morningstar Packaging & Containers

  $100.00    $181.39    $225.12    $232.35    $291.11    $331.43    $100.00   $125.29   $144.34   $171.46   $150.92   $176.64 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  Year Ended March 31,   Year Ended March 31, 
  2014 (1)   2013 (2)   2012 (3)   2011 (4)   2010 (5)   2017 (1)   2016 (2)   2015 (3)   2014 (4)   2013 (5) 

Net revenues

  $706,432    $659,815    $510,247    $338,284    $276,821    $923,295   $870,825   $810,772   $706,432   $659,815 

Gross profit

   132,057     126,351     98,284     67,978     48,601     196,809    181,626    173,274    132,057    126,351 

Operating income

   60,123     70,705     45,551     32,260     22,911     110,966    94,428    96,912    60,123    70,705 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

   28,224     30,300     19,700     18,411     14,268     60,996    47,739    45,716    28,224    30,300 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $1.73    $1.88    $1.34    $1.42    $1.17    $3.61   $2.85   $2.75   $1.73   $1.88 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $1.70    $1.86    $1.32    $1.40    $1.16    $3.58   $2.82   $2.71   $1.70   $1.86 

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic

   16,342     16,145     14,662     13,005     12,209  

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted

   16,599     16,332     14,903     13,139     12,332  

Dividends declared per common share

  $0.20    $0.20    $0.20    $0.20    $0.20  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding – basic

   16,879    16,750    16,623    16,342    16,145 

Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding – diluted

   17,024    16,952    16,877    16,599    16,332 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Dividends per common share

  $0.20   $0.20   $0.20   $0.20   $0.20 

Dividends paid

   3,276     3,237     2,941     2,612     2,469     3,876    3,351    3,302    3,276    3,237 

Working capital

   56,993     68,107     34,869     30,357     19,934  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net working capital

  $109,420   $111,100   $99,951   $56,993   $68,107 

Total assets

   964,466     839,550     809,654     411,829     285,342     1,091,990    1,070,066    927,371    964,466    839,550 

Short-term debt

   42,648     23,946     24,471     12,304     10,001  

Current portion of long-term debt

   2,093    1,573    2,947    42,648    23,946 

Long-term debt

   435,554     378,910     377,584     115,027     75,642     479,408    504,706    455,583    435,554    378,910 

Stockholders’ equity

   297,747     275,024     253,020     191,826     146,628  

Total stockholders’ equity

   381,820    342,632    289,473    297,747    275,024 

 

(1)Fiscal 2017 results include $921 ($706 after-tax) related to the closure of our manufacturing facilities located in the following: Glasgow, Scotland; Sonoma, California; Greensboro, North Carolina; Dublin, Ireland; Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin.

(2)Fiscal 2016 results include $5,200 ($3,708 after-tax) related to the closure of our manufacturing facilities located in the following: Glasgow, Scotland; Sonoma, California; Greensboro, North Carolina; Dublin, Ireland; Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin; and a sales office located near Toronto, Canada.

(3)Fiscal 2015 results include a $951 impairment of goodwill related to the finalization of the fiscal 2014 annual impairment test for our Latin America Wine & Spirits reporting unit and $7,399 ($4,533 after-tax) in costs primarily related to the closure of our manufacturing facilities located in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin.

(4)Fiscal 2014 results include a $13,475 impairment of goodwill related to our Latin America Wine & SpiritSpirits reporting unit. Fiscal 2014 results includeunit, $1,166 ($737 after-tax) in costs related to the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities located in El Dorado Hills, California into the Napa, California facility, $1,116 ($781 after-tax) of integration expenses related to the Labelmakers Wine Division acquisition and other income of $3,800 ($3,800 after-tax) from settlement of a legal claim.

 

(2)(5)Fiscal 2013 results include $1,531 ($1,194 after-tax) in costs related to the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities located in Montreal, Canada and Kansas City, Missouri into other existing facilities and $1,337 ($1,040 after-tax) of integration expenses related to the York Label Group (York) acquisition.

(3)Fiscal 2012 results include a charge of $1,182 ($715 after-tax), related to the consolidation of the Kansas City, Missouri facility into other existing facilities, primarily for employee severance and other termination benefits, non-cash charges related to asset impairments and relocation and other costs. Results also include $5,608 ($3,727 after-tax) of integration expenses related to the acquisition of York.

(4)Fiscal 2011 results include a charge of $2,800 ($1,750 after-tax) related to the settlement of a legal dispute with the John Henry Company. Results also include a pre-tax reduction of $258 ($192 after-tax) to the initial charge recorded in fiscal 2010, in connection with the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters from Sharonville, Ohio to its Batavia, Ohio facility, to incorporate the impact of the additional sublease income on the sublease of the remaining unoccupied space.

(5)Fiscal 2010 results include a pre-tax gain of $3,451 ($2,141 after-tax) related to the sale of certain assets associated with the manufacture of gravure cylinders and a charge of $1,219 ($959 after-tax) for remaining lease obligations and other costs related to the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters from Sharonville, Ohio to its Batavia, Ohio facility.

Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of the impact of acquisitions completed during recent fiscal years that would impact the comparability of the selected financial data above. During fiscal 2017, we acquired Italstereo and I.L.A., which have manufacturing plants in Italy; Graphix, which has a manufacturing plant in Australia; and GIP, which has a manufacturing plant in France. During fiscal 2016, we acquired Mr. Labels and Supa Stik, which have manufacturing plants in Australia; Barat Group, which has manufacturing plants in France; Super Label, which has manufacturing plants in Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and China; and System Label and Cashin Print, which have manufacturing plants in Ireland. During fiscal 2015, we acquired Multiprint Labels Limited and New Era Packaging, which have manufacturing plants in Ireland, and Multi Labels Ltd., which has a manufacturing plant in England. During fiscal 2014, we acquired Imprimerie Champenosie,Champenoise, Labelmakers Wine Division, Flexo Print S.A. De C.V., Gern & Cie SA, John Watson & Company Limited and the DI-NA-CAL label business, which have manufacturing plants in France, Australia, Mexico, Switzerland, Scotland and the U.S., respectively. During fiscal 2013, we acquired Labelgraphics (Holdings) Ltd., which has a manufacturing plant in Scotland. During fiscal 2012, we acquired La Cromografica, Warszawski Dom Handlowy and York, which have manufacturing plants in Italy, Poland, the U.S., Canada and Chile.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements that involve potential risks and uncertainties. Multi-Color Corporation’s future results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed herein and those discussed in Part 1, Item 1A “Risk Factors.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof.

Refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” following the index in this Form 10-K. In the discussion that follows, all amounts are in thousands (both tables and text), except per share data and percentages.

Following is a discussion and analysis of the financial statements and other statistical data that management believes will enhance the understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows for the periods indicated, certain components of Multi-Color’s consolidated statements of income as a percentage of net revenues.

 

  Percentage of Net Revenues   Percentage of Net Revenues 
  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 

Net revenues

   100.0 100.0 100.0   100.0 100.0 100.0

Cost of revenues

   81.3 80.9 80.7   78.7 79.1 78.6
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   18.7  19.1  19.3   21.3 20.9 21.4

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   8.1  8.2  10.1   9.2 9.4 8.4

Facility closure expense

   0.2  0.2  0.2

Facility closure expenses

   0.1 0.6 0.9

Goodwill impairment

   1.9  0.0  0.0   0.0 0.0 0.1
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income

   8.5  10.7  9.0   12.0 10.9 12.0

Interest expense

   3.1  3.4  2.9   2.8 3.0 3.3

Other income, net

   (0.9%)   (0.1%)   (0.1%) 

Other expense (income), net

   (0.3)%  0.2 0.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes

   6.3  7.4  6.2   9.5 7.7 8.7

Income tax expense

   2.3  2.8  2.3   2.9 2.2 3.1
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

   4.0  4.6  3.9

Loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   —      —      0.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

   4.0  4.6  3.9   6.6 5.5 5.6
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We provide a complete line of innovative decorative label solutions and offer a variety of technical and graphic services to our customers based on their specific needs and requirements. Our customers include a wide range of consumer product companies, and we supply labels for many of the world’s best known brands and products, including home & personal care, wine & spirit,spirits, food & beverage, healthcare and specialty consumer products.

During fiscal 2014,2017, the Company had net revenues of $706,432$923,295 compared to $659,815$870,825 in the prior year, an increase of 7%6% or $46,617.$52,470. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 20132016 accounted for a 7%5% increase in revenue.revenues. Organic revenues increased 3% in volume, offset by a 2% decrease due to the unfavorable impact of sales mix and pricing.. Foreign exchange rates, primarily driven by the depreciation of the Australian dollarBritish pound and the Mexican peso, led to a 2% decrease of 1% in revenues year over year.

Gross profit increased $5,7068% or 5%$15,183 compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 20132016 contributed $6,135$9,876 to the gross profit increase. Gross margins remained relatively consistent at approximately 19% of net revenues compared to the prior year.were 21% in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016.

The label markets we serve exist in a competitive environment amidst price pressures. We continually search for ways to reduce our costs through improved production and labor efficiencies, reduced substrate waste, new substrate options and lower substrate pricing.

Operating income decreased $10,582increased 18% or 15%$16,538 compared to the prior year primarily due primarily to a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $13,475.increased sales and improved margins. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 20132016 contributed $2,489$5,023 to operating income in fiscal 2014.2017. Operating income in fiscal 20142017 includes $1,166$921 of expenses primarily related to the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities located in El Dorado Hills, CaliforniaDublin, Ireland into other existing facilities. Operating income in fiscal 2013 includes $1,531 of costs related toa single location and the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities located in Montreal, CanadaGlasgow, Scotland into a single location. Operating income in fiscal 2016 includes $5,200 of expenses primarily related to consolidation of the Dublin manufacturing facilities, consolidation of a manufacturing facility in Greensboro, North Carolina into existing facilities and Kansas City, Missouri into other existing facilities.closure of manufacturing facilities in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin.

Other income was $5,910$2,735 compared to $219expense of $1,867 in the prior year. ThisThe increase wasin other income primarily duerelates to adjustmentsfavorable foreign exchange in the current year compared to unfavorable foreign exchange in the supplemental purchase accruals of $2,451prior year and $3,800 related to the settlement of a legal claim.other discrete items.

During 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, sales to major customers (those exceeding 10% of the Company’s net revenues in one or more of the periods presented) approximated 17%, 15%17% and 14%18%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated net revenues. All of these sales were made to theThe Procter & Gamble Company.

Our vision is global leadership in premium label solutions. We currently serve customers located throughout North, Central and South America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, China and China.Southeast Asia. We continue to monitor and analyze new trends in the packaging and consumer products industries to ensure that we are providing appropriate services and products to our customers. Certain factors that influence our business include consumer spending, new product introductions, new packaging technologies and demographics.

Our primary objective for fiscal 20152018 is to continue to improve organic growth rates for both revenue and earnings. We expect growth to come from improved operating performance due toin our operations and the finalization of integration of our recent acquisitions in North America, Europe and Australia.Europe. We continue to invest in additional and more productive capacity throughout our locationsbusiness to support operational efficiency and organic growth.

COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 20142017 AND MARCH 31, 20132016

Net Revenues

 

   2014   2013   $
Change
   %
Change
 

Net Revenues

  $706,432    $659,815    $46,617     7
   2017   2016   $
Change
   %
Change
 

Net revenues

  $923,295   $870,825   $52,470    6% 

Net revenues increased 7%6% to $706,432$923,295 from $659,815$870,825 in the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 20132016 accounted for a 7%5% increase in revenue. Organicrevenues and organic revenues increased 3% in volume, offset by a 2% decrease due to the unfavorable impact of sales mix and pricing.. Foreign exchange rates, primarily driven by the depreciation of the Australian dollarBritish pound and the Mexican peso, led to a 2% decrease of 1% in revenues year over year.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

 

   2014  2013  $
Change
   %
Change
 

Cost of Revenues

  $574,375   $533,464   $40,911     8

% of Net Revenues

   81.3  80.9   

Gross Profit

  $132,057   $126,351   $5,706     5

% of Net Revenues

   18.7  19.1   
         $   % 
   2017  2016  Change   Change 

Cost of revenues

  $726,486  $689,199  $37,287    5

% of Net revenues

   78.7  79.1   

Gross profit

  $196,809  $181,626  $15,183    8

% of Net revenues

   21.3  20.9   

Cost of revenues increased 8%5% or $40,911$37,287 compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2013 accounted for an 8% increase in cost2016 contributed 4% or $24,282, partially offset by the favorable impact of sales. Included in the increase due to acquisitions is a chargeforeign exchange rates of $190 for an adjustment related to the step-up of finished goods and work-in-process inventory in the purchase price accounting for DI-NA-CAL. The2% or $14,110. Organic revenue growth increased cost of revenues in the prior year was impacted by a one-time charge of $458 for an adjustment related to the step-up of finished goods and work-in-process inventory in the purchase price accounting for Labelgraphics.$27,115.

Gross profit increased $5,7068% or $15,183 compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2016 contributed $9,876 to gross profit, partially offset by the effect of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of $1,168. Gross margins were 21.3% of net revenues for the current year compared to 20.9% in the prior year. Higher sales volumes in our core markets globally and improved operating efficiencies, primarily in North America, increased margins and led to $6,475 of organic margin improvement compared to the prior year.

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses and Facility Closure Expenses

         $   % 
   2017  2016  Change   Change 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  $84,922  $81,998  $2,924    4

% of Net revenues

   9.2  9.4   

Facility closure expenses

  $921  $5,200  $(4,279   (82%) 

% of Net revenues

   0.1  0.6   

SG&A expenses increased 4% or $2,924 compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2016 contributed $4,853 to the increase, partially offset by a decrease of $911 due to the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates. In the current year, the Company incurred $1,101 of acquisition and integration expenses compared to $3,683 in the prior year. The remaining increase

primarily relates to increases in compensation costs including internal compliance resources and increased incentive accruals related to company performance in fiscal 2017.

Facility closure expenses were $921 in the current year compared to $5,200 in the prior year. These expenses relate to consolidation of facilities in certain locations into other existing facilities, primarily related to the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities in Dublin, Ireland ($355), the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities in Glasgow, Scotland ($262), the consolidation of our plants in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin ($133), Sonoma, California ($52), and Greensboro, North Carolina ($119) into existing facilities. In the prior year, facility closure expenses related to the consolidation of the facilities in Dublin ($1,476) and Glasgow ($597), as well as the consolidation of the plants in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin ($632), Greensboro, North Carolina ($2,247), and Sonoma, California ($220) and closure of a sales office in Toronto, Canada ($28).

Interest Expense and Other Income, net

           $   % 
   2017   2016   Change   Change 

Interest expense

  $25,488   $25,751   $(263   (1%) 

Other expense (income), net

  $(2,735  $1,867   $(4,602   246

Other income was $2,735 compared to expense of $1,867 in the prior year. During the current year, adjustments were made to other income for $887 to reconcile certain supplemental purchase price accruals to management’s current estimate of the liability. Additionally, an adjustment was made to other income for $690 to state MCC’s 30% investment in Gironde Imprimerie Publicité (GIP) at its fair value upon purchase of an additional 67.6% ownership in the company (97.6% owned at March 31, 2017). The remaining change in other income primarily relates to the favorable impact of gains and losses on foreign exchange compared to unfavorable foreign exchange resulting from re-measurement of equipment and other payables from certain currencies into functional currencies in the prior year.

Income Tax Expense

           $   % 
   2017   2016   Change   Change 

Income tax expense

  $26,848   $18,981   $7,867    41

The Company’s effective tax rate was 30% in fiscal 2017 compared to 28% in the prior year. The tax rate for fiscal 2016 was impacted by the release of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets held in certain foreign jurisdictions and other discrete items that reduced tax expense compared to the current year.

COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND MARCH 31, 2015

Net Revenues

           $   % 
   2016   2015   Change   Change 

Net revenues

  $870,825   $810,772   $60,053    7

Net revenues increased 7% to $870,825 from $810,772 in the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2015 accounted for an 11% increase in revenue and organic revenues increased 1%. Foreign exchange rates, primarily driven by the depreciation of the Australian dollar and the Euro, led to a 5% decrease in revenues year over year.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

         $   % 
   2016  2015  Change   Change 

Cost of revenues

  $689,199  $637,498  $51,701    8

% of Net revenues

   79.1  78.6   

Gross profit

  $181,626  $173,274  $8,352    5

% of Net revenues

   20.9  21.4   

Cost of revenues increased 8% or $51,701 compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2015 contributed $73,435 or 12%, partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates.

Gross profit increased $8,352 or 5% compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 20132015 contributed $6,135$17,925 to thegross profit. Operating inefficiencies offset organic margin improvements resulting in a $4,010 reduction in gross margin. Unfavorable foreign exchange rates of $5,563 also reduced gross profit increase.during the year. Gross margins were 20.9% of net revenues for the current year compared to 21.4% in the prior year. Operating inefficiencies in our core markets globally and the impact of foreign exchange rates led to a 0.4% reduction in gross margin. The remaining reduction in gross margin is primarily due to recent acquisitions which have lower margins than the Company as a whole.

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses and Other Operating ItemsFacility Closure Expenses

 

   2014  2013  $
Change
  %
Change
 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

  $57,293   $54,115   $3,178    6

% of Net Revenues

   8.1  8.2  

Facility Closure Expense

  $1,166   $1,531   $(365  (24%) 

% of Net Revenues

   0.2  0.2  

         $   % 
   2016  2015  Change   Change 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  $81,998  $68,012  $13,986    21

% of Net revenues

   9.4  8.4   

Facility closure expenses

  $5,200  $7,399  $(2,199   (30%) 

% of Net revenues

   0.6  0.9   

SG&A expenses increased $3,178$13,986 or 6% compared to the prior year. SG&A increased $3,692 primarily due to the impact of acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2013, partially offset by favorable currency fluctuations of $842. SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net revenues, remained consistent at approximately 8% of net revenues compared to the prior year.

In October 2013, the Company announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in El Dorado Hills, California into the Napa, California facility. In connection with the closure of the El Dorado Hills facility, the Company recorded initial charges in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 of $1,382 for employee termination benefits, including severance and relocation and other costs. These were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the nature of the employee termination benefits was determined to be such that adjustments were made to reduce the pre-tax impact to the initial charge by $216. The total amount of charges related to closure for El Dorado Hills for fiscal 2014 was $1,166.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company consolidated the two operations located in Montreal, Canada into one manufacturing facility. The Company incurred charges of $676 in fiscal 2013 related to fixed asset write-offs and relocation costs in conjunction with the plant consolidation.

Goodwill Impairment Loss

   2014   2013   $
Change
   %
Change
 

Goodwill Impairment Loss

  $13,475    $—      $13,475     100

After conducting our annual impairment testing, we recorded an impairment charge of $13,475 to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill of our Latin America Wine & Spirit reporting unit to fair value. See further details in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section below.

Interest Expense and Other Income, net

   2014  2013  $
Change
  %
Change
 

Interest Expense

  $21,776   $22,237   $(461  (2%) 

Other Income, net

  $(5,910 $(219 $(5,691  (2599%) 

Interest expense decreased $461 or 2% compared to the prior year due primarily to the release of reserves in relation to uncertain tax positions and related accrued interest of $840 during fiscal 2014.

Other income was $5,910 in fiscal 2014 compared to $219 in the prior year. Supplemental purchase price amounts were due to the sellers of the Labelgraphics and John Watson businesses acquired in fiscal 2013 and 2014, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2014, adjustments were made to other income for $2,451 to adjust the supplemental purchase accruals to management’s best estimate of the liability. See Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we recorded income of $3,800 related to settlement of a legal claim.

Income Tax Expense

   2014   2013   $
Change
  %
Change
 

Income Tax Expense

  $16,033    $18,387    $(2,354  (13%) 

The Company’s effective tax rate was 36% in fiscal 2014 compared to 38% in the prior year due primarily to the release of $3,295 in provisions for uncertain tax positions following the closure of tax audits. The Company expects its annual effective tax rate to be approximately 35% in fiscal year 2015.

COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 AND MARCH 31, 2012

Net Revenues

           $   % 
   2013   2012   Change   Change 

Net Revenues

  $659,815    $510,247    $149,568     29

Net revenues increased 29% to $659,815 from $510,247 in the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2012 accounted for 27% of the 29% increase or $139,672. Of this acquisition-related revenue increase, $114,673 is attributable to the acquisition of York. The remaining increase was due to a 2% increase in sales volume, a 2% favorable impact of sales mix and a 2% unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates primarily driven by the depreciation of the Euro.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

         $   % 
   2013  2012  Change   Change 

Cost of Revenues

  $533,464   $411,963   $121,501     29

% of Net Revenues

   80.9  80.7   

Gross Profit

  $126,351   $98,284   $28,067     29

% of Net Revenues

   19.1  19.3   

Cost of revenues increased 29% or $121,501 compared to the prior year. The majority of the increase in cost of revenues was due to acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2012, which contributed $121,912 to the cost of revenues increase. Included in the increase due to acquisitions is a charge of $458 for an adjustment related to the step-up of finished goods and work-in-process inventory in the purchase price accounting for Labelgraphics. The cost of revenues in the prior year was impacted by a one-time charge of $1,530 for an adjustment related to the step-up of finished goods and work-in-process inventory in the purchase price accounting for York.

Gross profit increased $28,067 or 29%21% compared to the prior year. Acquisitions occurring after the beginning of the fiscal 20122015 contributed $18,999$11,736 to the gross profit increase. The remaining increase, was due to the higher sales volumes and favorable sales mix impact. Gross margins remained consistent at 19% of net revenues compared to the prior year.

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses and Other Operating Items

         $   % 
   2013  2012  Change   Change 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

  $54,115   $51,551   $2,564     5

% of Net Revenues

   8.2  10.1   

Facility Closure Expense

  $1,531   $1,182   $349     30

% of Net Revenues

   0.2  0.2   

SG&A expenses increased $2,564 or 5% compared to the prior year. SG&A increased $9,220 primarily due to the impact of acquisitions occurring after the beginning of fiscal 2012 partially offset by a decrease of $6,656 in integration and acquisition expenses related$3,183 due to the Yorkfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates. In the current year, the Company incurred $3,683 of acquisition and integration expenses, compared to $1,787 in the prior year. SG&AThe remaining increase relates to professional fees year over year, including an incremental $4,051 for compliance costs. The majority of the compliance costs relate to consulting expenses as a percentageincurred for remediation measures to strengthen our internal control environment and remediation of net revenues, decreased from 10% to 8%material weaknesses.

Facility closure expenses were $5,200 compared to $7,399 in the prior year.

In January 2012, the Company announced plans These expenses relate to consolidate its manufacturing facility locatedconsolidation of facilities in Kansas City, Missouricertain locations into our other existing facilities. In connection withfacilities, including the consolidation of the Kansas City facility,Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin ($632), Greensboro, North Carolina ($2,247), and Sonoma, California ($220) facilities into existing facilities. Additionally, the Company incurred charges of $855is consolidating its manufacturing facilities in fiscal 2013Dublin, Ireland ($1,476) into a single location and $1,182the manufacturing facilities in Glasgow, Scotland ($597) into a single location and closed a sales office in Toronto, Canada ($28). In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 primarily for employee severance and other termination benefits, non-cash chargesprior year, facility closure expenses related to asset impairmentsNorway, Michigan and relocationWatertown, Wisconsin ($7,271) and other costs. The transition from the Kansas City facility has been completed. In September 2012, the Kansas City facility was sold for net proceeds of $625.El Dorado Hills, California ($128).

Goodwill Impairment

           $   % 
   2016   2015   Change   Change 

Goodwill impairment

  $—     $951   $(951   (100%) 

In the third quarter2015, we recorded an impairment charge of fiscal 2013, the Company consolidated the two operations located in Montreal, Canada into one manufacturing facility. The Company incurred charges of $676 in fiscal 2013$951 related to fixed asset write-offs and relocation costs in conjunction with the plant consolidation.finalization of the fiscal 2014 impairment analysis for the Latin America Wine & Spirits reporting unit.

Interest Expense and Other Income, net

 

         $   % 
   2013  2012  Change   Change 

Interest Expense

  $22,237   $15,010   $7,227     48

Other Income, net

  $(219 $(583 $364     62

           $   % 
   2016   2015   Change   Change 

Interest expense

  $25,751   $26,386   $(635   (2%) 

Other expense (income), net

  $1,867   $(346  $2,213    640

Interest expense increased $7,227decreased $635 or 48%2% compared to the prior year, due primarily to a fullthe write-off of $2,001 of deferred financing fees related to refinancing debt in fiscal 2015. The decrease was offset by an increase in debt borrowings throughout the year of interest on the debt used to finance the acquisition of York.acquisitions.

Other income decreased $364expense was $1,867 compared to income of $346 in the prior year primarily related to unfavorable foreign exchange resulting from re-measurement of equipment and other payables from certain currencies into functional currencies in Latin America.

Income Tax Expense

           $   % 
   2016   2015   Change   Change 

Income tax expense

  $18,981   $25,156   $(6,175   (25%) 

The Company’s effective tax rate decreased to 28% in fiscal 2016 from 35% in the prior year primarily due to lower realized gains onthe mix of income in some of our foreign exchange in fiscal 2013.

Income Tax Expense

           $   % 
   2013   2012   Change   Change 

Income Tax Expense

  $18,387    $11,456    $6,931     61

The Company’s effectivejurisdictions, the impact of tax rate was 38%changes in fiscal 2013 compared to 37% incertain foreign jurisdictions enacted during the priorperiod and other discrete items recognized during the current year due primarily to a shift in the geographical mix of worldwide earnings between domestic and foreign jurisdictions.that reduced tax expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary of Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities was $80,617$107,210 in 2014 compared to $69,7132017 and $99,401 in 2013. Our net working capital use of $5,027 in 2014 decreased from $8,001 in 2013.2016. Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation adjusted for non-cash expenses consisting primarily of depreciation and amortization was $109,097 in the current year compared to $98,936 in the prior year. The $10,161 increase from 2016 to 2017 in net income adjusted for non-cash expenses was primarily driven by a 28% increase in net income from $47,829 in 2016 to $61,365 in 2017. The increase in net income in 2017 is the result of an increase in net sales led by increased volumes in North America, Latin America and Australia along with lower facility closure expenses. Our cash from operating assets and liabilities was a net usage of $1,887 in 2017 as compared to a net source of $465 in 2016.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $99,401 in 2016 and $106,975 in 2015. Net income adjusted for non-cash expenses consisting primarily of depreciation and amortization, goodwill impairment, facility closure expenses related to impairment loss on fixed assets and changes in deferred taxes was $85,644$98,936 in 20142016 compared to $77,714$104,316 in 20132015. This decrease is primarily driven by decreased operating income primarily due to operating inefficiencies in core markets, increased compliance costs and unfavorable foreign exchange, partially offset by increased sales and gross profitsoperating income from acquisitions.

Net cash provided by Our net source from operating activities increased to $69,713assets and liabilities of $465 in 2013 from $56,477 in 2012. The net working capital use of $8,001 in 20132016 decreased from a source of $1,426$2,659 in 2012. This was more than offset by net cash inflows from net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation adjusted for non-cash expenses primarily of depreciation and amortization and changes in deferred taxes of $77,714 in 2013 over $55,051 in 2012 due primarily to growth through acquisitions.2015.

Net cash used in investing activities was $153,375$73,635 in 2014, $42,6492017, $135,032 in 20132016 and $294,891$59,922 in 2012 of2015. Cash used in investing activities included $28,839, $103,245 and $31,240 which $133,499, $15,979 and $275,872 was used for acquisitions in those years.years, respectively, including $3,123 in purchase price adjustments in 2017 for prior year acquisitions, primarily Cashin Print and System Label. The remaining net usageusages of $19,876$44,796 in 2014, $26,6702017, $31,787 in 20132016 and $19,019$28,682 in 20122015 were capital expenditure related, primarily for the purchase of presses net of various sales or lease-back proceeds. The projected amountsales. Capital expenditures were primarily funded by cash flows from operations.

Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2017 was $33,641, which included $31,467 of capital expenditures for 2015 is $33,000.net debt payments and $4,000 of proceeds from various stock transactions, offset by $1,784 in deferred payments related to the Mr. Labels and Flexo Print acquisitions and dividends paid of $3,876. Dividends paid includes $3,378 to shareholders of Multi-Color Corporation and $498 to the minority shareholders of our 60% owned legal entity in Malaysia.

Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2016 was $67,480 in 2014,$45,200, which consisted of $73,224included $44,997 of net debt borrowings (primarily used to finance acquisitions) and $2,025$4,713 of net proceeds from various stock transactions, offset by dividends paid of $3,276, debt issuance costs of $1,364, and a $3,129 deferred payment related to the York acquisition.

Net cash used by financing activities was $21,189 in 2013, which consisted of dividends paid of $3,237, deferred payments of $14,380 and $5,049 related to the York and Labelgraphics acquisitions respectively, less $283 of net borrowings and $1,194 from the issuance of stock.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $233,781 in 2012 which consisted of $255,883 of net borrowings and $1,587 from the issuance of stock offset by dividends paid of $2,941, debt issuance costs of $8,562, and $12,186$1,141 in deferred payments related to acquisitions.the Monroe Etiquette and Multiprint acquisitions and dividends paid of $3,351.

Net cash used in financing activities was $37,371 in 2015, which consisted of $19,895 of net debt payments, contingent consideration payments of $10,916 related to the John Watson and Labelgraphics acquisitions, debt issuance costs of $7,921 and dividends paid of $3,302, offset by $4,663 of net proceeds from various stock transactions. Financing activities in 2015 include $250,000 in long-term debt borrowings related to the issuance of the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”) in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 and $341,625 in payments to pay off the Term Loan under the prior credit agreement. The $7,921 in debt issuance costs were paid in conjunction with the issuance of the Notes and entry into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).

Capital Resources

On February 29, 2008,November 21, 2014, the Company executedissued $250,000 aggregate principal amount of the Notes. The Notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Interest is payable on June 1st and December 1st of each year beginning June 1, 2015 until the maturity date of December 1, 2022. The Company’s obligations under the Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s existing direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company incurred debt issuance costs of $5,413 during 2015, which are being deferred and amortized over the eight year term of the Notes.

Concurrent with the issuance and sale of the Notes, the Company amended and restated its credit agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for revolving loans of up to $500,000 for a five year $200,000term expiring on November 21, 2019. The aggregate commitment amount is comprised of the following: (i) a $460,000 revolving credit agreement withfacility (the “U.S. Revolving Credit Facility”) and (ii) an Australian dollar equivalent of a consortium$40,000 revolving credit facility (the “Australian Revolving Sub-Facility”).

Upon issuance of bank lenders (Credit Facility) with an original expiration date in 2013. In August 2011,the Notes, the Company executedwas required to repay in full the third amendment toTerm Loan Facility under the terms of its prior credit agreement. On November 21, 2014, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $341,625 on the Term Loan Facility using the net proceeds from the Notes and borrowings on the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility. The third amendment increasedrepayment of the aggregate principal amountTerm Loan Facility was treated primarily as an

extinguishment of debt. As a result, $2,001 in unamortized deferred financing fees were recorded to $500,000 with an additional $315,000 term loan,interest expense during 2015 as a loss on the extinguishment of debt. The remaining unamortized fees of $2,275 and new debt issuance costs of $2,526, which the Company drew down onwere incurred during 2015 in conjunction with the York Label Group acquisition in October 2011. In February 2014,Credit Agreement, were deferred and are being amortized over the Company executed the seventh amendment tofive year term of the Credit Facility to access $100,000 to fund the acquisition of the DI-NA-CAL label business (see Note 3). As a result of the first through seventh amendments, which were executed in fiscal 2011 through fiscal 2014, the following current provisions are in place for the Credit Facility.Agreement.

The Credit Agreement may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes and to fund permitted acquisitions (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates plus a margin, based on the Company’s consolidated senior secured leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility was 2.72% and 2.33% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and on borrowings under the Australian Revolving Sub-Facility was 3.43% and 3.89% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties as well as customary negative and affirmative covenants which require the Company to maintain the following financial covenants at March 31, 2014:the end of each quarter: (i) a minimummaximum consolidated net worth;senior secured leverage ratio of no more than 3.50 to 1.00; (ii) a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 4.25no more than 4.50 to 1.001.00; and (iii) a minimum consolidated interest charge coverage ratio of not less than 4.00 to 1.00. The maximum consolidated leverage ratio has scheduled step downs to 3.50 to 1.00 in future periods. The Credit FacilityAgreement contains customary mandatory and optional prepayment provisions and customary events of default,default. The U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and isthe Australian Revolving Sub-Facility are secured by the capital stock of subsidiaries, intercompany debt andsubstantially all of the Company’sassets of each of our domestic subsidiaries, but excluding existing and non-material real property, and intercompany debt. The Australian Revolving Sub-Facility is also secured by substantially all of the assets but excluding real property. of the Australian borrower and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”) limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit Agreement and the Indenture, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company isto dispose of assets, incur guarantee obligations, make restricted payments, create liens, make equity or debt investments, engage in mergers, change the business conducted by the Company and its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Under the Credit Agreement and the Indenture, certain changes in control of the Company could result in the occurrence of an Event of Default. In addition, the Credit Agreement limits the ability of the Company to modify terms of the Indenture. As of March 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with allthe covenants underin the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2014. The expiration date is August 2016.

The Credit Facility may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. Loans under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility bear interest either at: (i) base rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus the applicable margin for such loans which ranges from 1.00% to 2.50%; or (ii) the applicable London interbank offered rate, plus the applicable margin for such loans which ranges from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. Loans under the

Australian Sub-Facility bear interest at the BBSY Rate plus the applicable margin for such loans, which ranges from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing.

At March 31, 2014, the aggregate commitment amount of $556,875 under the Credit Facility is comprised of the following: (i) a $155,000 revolving Credit Facility that allows the Company to borrow in alternative currencies up to the equivalent of $50,000 (U.S. Revolving Credit Facility); (ii) the Australian dollar equivalent of a $40,000 revolving Credit Facility (Australian Sub-Facility); and (iii) a $361,875 term loan facility (Term Loan Facility) which amortizes quarterly based on an escalating percentage of the initial aggregate value of the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility amortizes quarterly based on the following schedule: (i) March 31, 2014 through December 31, 2015—amortization of $10,125 and (ii) March 31, 2016 through June 30, 2016—amortization of $15,188, with the balance due at maturity.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company incurred $1,364 in debt issuance costs related to the debt modification that occurred as a result of the seventh amendment to the Credit Facility. We analyzed the new loan costsAgreement and the existing unamortized loan costs related to the prior agreement allocated to the amended revolving line of credit and term loan separately to determine the amount of costs to be capitalized and the amount to be expensed. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded $99 to selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2014 to expense certain third-party fees related to the modification of the term loan. The remaining new and unamortized deferred loan costs are being deferred and amortized over the term of the modified agreement.

The Company incurred $8,562 of debt issuance costs in fiscal 2012 related to the debt modification, which are being deferred and amortized over the life of the amended Credit Facility. In conjunction with the modification to our debt in the third amendment to the Credit Facility, we analyzed the new loan costs related to the amended Credit Facility and the existing unamortized loan costs related to the prior agreement allocated to the revolving line of credit, prior term loan and amended term loan separately to determine the amount of costs to be capitalized and the amount to be expensed. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a charge to interest expense of $490 in fiscal 2012 to write-off certain deferred financing fees, which were paid to originate the prior agreement, including the unamortized portion of the loan costs allocated to creditors no longer participating in the amended Credit Facility. The unamortized portion of loan costs allocated to creditors participating in both the original and amended Credit Facility are being amortized over the term of the modified agreement.Indenture.

The Company recorded $2,057, $1,979$1,665, $1,692 and $1,474$2,200 in interest expense for the years ending March 31, 2014, 2013in 2017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income to amortize deferred financing costs.

Available borrowings under the Credit FacilityAgreement at March 31, 20142017 consisted of $70,263$256,387 under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and $11,464$8,035 under the Australian Revolving Sub-Facility. The Company also has various other uncommitted lines of credit available at March 31, 20142017 in the amount of $8,731.

In April 2008, the Company entered into two Swaps, a $40,000 non-amortizing Swap and a $40,000 amortizing Swap, to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates. Interest payments were based on fixed rates of 3.45% for the non-amortizing Swap and 3.04% for the amortizing Swap, plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility ranging from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Swaps expired in February 2013.

In October 2011, in connection with the drawdown of the $315,000 term loan for the acquisition of York Label Group, the Company entered into three forward starting non-amortizing Swaps for a total notional amount of $125,000 to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Swaps became effective October 2012 and expire in August 2016. The Swaps result in interest payments based on an average fixed rate of 1.396% plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility, which was 4.896% as of March 31, 2014.$9,676.

We believe that we have both sufficient short and long-term liquidity and financing at this time. We anticipate being able to support our short-term liquidity and operating needs largely through cash generated from operations. We had a net working capital position of $56,993$109,420 and $68,107$111,100 at March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, and were in compliance with our loan covenants and current in our principal and interest payments on all debt.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of March 31, 2014:2017:

 

  Total   Year 1   Year 2   Year 3   Year 4   Year 5   More than
5 years
   Total   Year 1   Year 2   Year 3   Year 4   Year 5   More than
5 years
 

Long-term debt

  $475,997    $40,920    $45,893    $388,881    $260    $43    $—      $480,424   $129   $114   $230,101   $37   $33   $250,010 

Capital leases

   2,205     1,728     477     —       —       —       —       7,412    1,964    1,837    1,768    1,375    468    —   

Interest on long-term debt (1)

   52,711     22,329     21,505     8,862     13     2     —       106,781    23,139    21,787    19,805    16,529    15,313    10,208 

Rent due under operating leases

   70,604     12,970     10,633     9,003     7,299     6,238     24,461     57,374    12,257    9,878    8,595    7,433    6,416    12,795 

Unconditional purchase obligations

   7,731     7,731     —       —       —       —       —       17,756    17,349    375    14    14    4    —   

Pension and post retirement obligations

   1,074     21     34     50     63     118     788  

Pension obligations

   439    6    15    22    30    40    326 

Unrecognized tax benefits (2)

   —       —       —       —       —       —       —       —      —      —      —      —      —      —   

Deferred purchase price

   14,002     10,307     1,123     1,950     —       622     —       7,534    1,080    5,668    786    —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $624,324    $96,006    $79,665    $408,746    $7,635    $7,023    $25,249    $677,720   $55,924   $39,674   $261,091   $25,418   $22,274   $273,339 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Interest on floating rate debt was estimated using projected forward LIBOR and BBSY rates as of March 31, 2014.2017.

(2)The table excludes $4,161$5,665 in liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as the timing and extent of such payments are not determinable.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2017.

Recent Acquisitions

On February 1, 2014,January 3, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of Graphix Labels and Packaging Pty Ltd. (Graphix) for $17,261. The purchase price included $1,631 that is deferred for two years after the assets ofclosing date. Graphix is located in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and specializes in producing labels for both the DI-NA-CAL label business, based near Cincinnati, Ohio, from Graphic Packaging International, Inc. for $80,667. DI-NA-CAL operates manufacturing facilities near Cincinnati, Ohio and Greensboro, North Carolina and provides decorative label solutions primarily in the heat transfer label markets for home & personal care and food & beverage through long-standing relationships with blue chip national and multi-national customers. The acquisition extends Multi-Color’s position in the heat transfer label market and allows us to support a number of new customers with a broader range of label technologies.

On October 1, 2013,wine & spirits markets. In January 2017, the Company acquired John Watsonan additional 67.6% of the common shares of Gironde Imprimerie Publicité (GIP) for $2,084 plus net debt assumed of $862. The purchase price included $208 that is deferred for one year after the closing date. The Company acquired 30% of GIP as part of the Barat acquisition in fiscal 2016. GIP is located in the Bordeaux region of France and specializes in producing labels for the wine & spirits market.

On July 1, 2016, the Company Limited (Watson), based in Glasgow, Scotland,acquired 100% of Italstereo Resin Labels S.r.l. (Italstereo) for $21,634$3,342 less net cash acquired of $143. Watson$181. The purchase price includes $201 and $133 that are deferred for one and two years, respectively, after the closing date. Italstereo is the leading glue-applied spirit label producerlocated near Lucca, Italy and specializes in the U.K. The business is ideally located for its key customers and is complementary to MCC’s existing business in Glasgow (formerly Labelgraphics), the leadingproducing pressure sensitive wineadhesive resin coated labels, seals and spirit label producer in the same region.

emblems. On October 1, 2013,July 6, 2016, the Company acquired Gern & Cie SA (Gern), the premier wine label producer in Switzerland, located in Neuchatel, Switzerland100% of Industria Litografica Alessandrina S.r.l. (I.L.A.) for $5,939. Gern has similar customer profiles and technologies as our existing French operations.

On August 1, 2013, the Company acquired Flexo Print S.A. De C.V., based in Guadalajara, Mexico, for $31,847$6,301 plus net debt assumed of $2,324. Flexo Print is a leading producer of home & personal care, food & beverage, wine & spirit and pharmaceutical labels in Latin America. The acquisition provides Multi-Color with significant growth opportunities in Mexico through our many common customers, technologies and suppliers.

On April 2, 2013, the Company acquired Labelmakers Wine Division in Adelaide, Australia and Imprimerie Champenoise in the Champagne region of France for $7,362.

On April 2, 2012, the Company acquired Labelgraphics, a wine & spirit label specialist located in Glasgow, Scotland, for $24,634 plus net debt assumed of $712.$3,547. The purchase price includes a future performance based earnout$819 that is deferred for three years after the closing date. I.L.A. is located in the Piedmont region of approximately 15% of the above total. The acquisition expanded MCC’s global presenceItaly and specializes in producing premium self-adhesive and wet glue labels primarily for the wine & spirit labelspirits market particularlyand also services the food industry.

On January 4, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of Cashin Print for $17,487 less net cash acquired of $135 and 100% of System Label for $11,665 less net cash acquired of $2,025. Cashin Print and System Label are located in Castlebar, Ireland and Roscommon, Ireland, respectively. The purchase prices for Cashin Print and System Label include deferred payments of $3,317 and $1,011, respectively. These deferred payments may be paid out in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. The acquired businesses supply multinational customers in Ireland, the United Kingdom.Kingdom and Continental Europe and provide Multi-Color with the opportunity to supply a broader product range to a larger customer base, especially in the healthcare market.

On October 3, 2011,1, 2015, the Company acquired York, including its joint venture100% of Supa Stik Labels (Supa Stik) for $6,787 less net cash acquired of $977. Supa Stik is located in Santiago, Chile,Perth, West Australia and services the local wine, food & beverage and healthcare label markets. The purchase price includes $622 that is deferred for $329,204 plus net debt assumedtwo years after the closing date.

On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired 90% of $9,870. York,the shares of Super Label based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, which was headquarteredpublicly listed on the Malaysian stock exchange. During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2016, the Company acquired the remaining shares and delisted Super Label. The total purchase price was $39,782 less net cash acquired of $6,035. Super Label has operations in Omaha, Nebraska, is a leader inMalaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and China and produces home & personal care, food & beverage and wine & spiritspecialty consumer products labels. This acquisition expands our presence in China and gives us access to new label markets within Southeast Asia.

On May 4, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Barat Group (Barat) based in Bordeaux, France for $49,973 less net cash acquired of $746. Barat operates four manufacturing facilities in Bordeaux and Burgundy, France, and the U.S., Canadaacquisition gives the Company access to the label market in the Bordeaux wine region and Chile. The acquisition strengthened Multi-Color’sexpands our presence in its core markets through the combination of the Company’s existing customer relationships with York’s customer base.Burgundy.

On JulyMay 1, 2011,2015, the Company acquired WDH, a consumer products100% of Mr. Labels in Brisbane, Queensland Australia for $2,110. The purchase price includes $196 that was deferred until the first anniversary of the closing date, which was paid during fiscal 2017. Mr. Labels provides labels primarily to food and spirit label company locatedbeverage customers.

On February 2, 2015, the Company acquired New Era Packaging (New Era) for $16,366 less net cash acquired of $1,741. New Era is based near Dublin, Ireland and specializes in Warsaw, Poland,labels for $7,760the healthcare, pharmaceutical and food industries. On January 5, 2015, the Company acquired Multi Labels Ltd. (Multi Labels) for $15,670 plus net debt assumed of $4,019. The purchase price included a contingent payment to be made to the selling shareholders if certain financial targets were reached. The financial targets were reached$3,733. Multi Labels is based in calendar year 2011Daventry, near London, England, and the contingent payment was madespecializes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. WDH supplies a number of large consumer products companiespremium alcoholic beverage labels for spirits and international brand owners in home & personal care markets, consistent with MCC’s largest customers in the U.S.

imported wine. On May 2, 2011,July 1, 2014, the Company acquired 70% ownershipMultiprint Labels Limited (Multiprint) based in two label operations in Latin America; one in Santiago, Chile and the other in Mendoza, Argentina with a regional partner owning the remaining 30%. MCC’s investment including debt assumed was approximately $3,900. These label operations focus on providing premium labels to the expanding Latin American wine & spirit markets. In September

2011, the Company bought the regional partner’s 30% ownership interest in the two label operations in Latin AmericaDublin, Ireland for 40 shares of Multi-Color common stock. As a result, MCC now owns 100% of the acquired label operations in Chile and Argentina.

On April 1, 2011, the Company acquired La Cromografica, an Italian wine label specialist located in Florence, Italy, for $9,880$1,662 plus net debt assumed of $1,628. La Cromografica$2,371. The purchase price includes $273 that was deferred for one year after the closing date, which was paid during fiscal 2016. Multiprint specializes in high quality winepressure sensitive labels for Italian premium winesthe wine & spirits and provides further access tobeverage markets in Ireland and the Italian wine label market.UK.

Inflation

We do not believe that our operations have been materially affected by inflation. Inflationary price increases for raw materials could adversely impact our sales and profitability in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We continually evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories and any related reserves, income taxes, fixed assets, goodwill and intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies impact the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, our senior management has reviewed the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Board of Directors’ Audit and Finance Committee. For a more detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations

The Company allocates the purchase price of its acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the acquisition date. The Company shall reportreports in its consolidated financial statements provisional amounts for the items for which accounting is incomplete. Goodwill is adjusted for any changes to provisional amounts made within the measurement period. The Company utilizes management estimates and an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Such estimates and valuations require the Company to make significant assumptions, including projections of future events and operating performance.

Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

Impairment reviews comparing fair value to carrying value are highly judgmental and involve the use of significant estimates and assumptions, which determine whether there is potential impairment and the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Fair value assessments involve estimates of discounted cash flows that are dependent upon discount rates and long-term assumptions regarding future sales and margin trends, market conditions, cash flow and multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Actual results may differ from these estimates. Fair value measurements used in the impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets are Level 3 measurements, as described in Note 20.measurements. See further information about our policy for fair value measurements within this section below and in Note 20.

A portion of our goodwill and intangible assets relate to our Latin America Wine & Spirit (LA W&S) reporting unit. Due to lower operating performance as a result of increased competition caused by market conditions and pricing pressures in our Chilean operations, the fiscal 2014 analyses resulted in a $13,475 impairment charge related to goodwill. No impairment charges were recorded related to intangible assets in 2014.below.

Goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized and is reviewedtested for impairment annually, as of the last day of February of each fiscal year.annually. Impairment is also tested when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than the fair values. Historically, the Company’s policy was to perform the annual goodwill impairment test as of the last day of February of each fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal 2016, the Company moved from accelerated filer status to large accelerated filer status. As a result, the Form 10-K was required to be filed 15 days earlier than in previous years. In order to meet the shorter filing timeline, the Company changed its annual goodwill impairment testing date from the last day of February to the last day of January of each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2016. This change in the goodwill impairment testing date represents a change in accounting principle, which management determined to be preferable under the circumstances. The Company determined that it is impracticable to objectively determine projected cash flows and related valuation estimates that would have been used as of January 31 for periods prior to January 31, 2016 without the use of hindsight. Therefore, this change was applied prospectively on January 31, 2016.

Based on operating results for the Europe Wine & Spirits (EUR W&S) reporting unit, a quantitative goodwill impairment assessment was performed during the second quarter of 2017 for this reporting unit. No impairment was indicated. Based on operating results for the Latin American Consumer Product Goods (LA CPG) and Latin America Wine & Spirits (LA W&S) reporting units during fiscal 2015, a quantitative goodwill impairment assessment was performed as of September 30, 2014 for those two reporting units. No impairment was indicated. No events or changes in circumstances occurred in 20142016 that required goodwill impairment testing in between annual tests. The 2013 and 2012 tests did not indicate impairment; however an impairment charge resulted from the 2014 test.

Goodwill has been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Company’s divisions. The Company can evaluate qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. For all but two

In conjunction with our annual impairment test as of our reporting units,January 31, 2017, the Company performed a qualitativequantitative assessment and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair valuesfor all of theour reporting unit is less than the carrying value. Due to lower operating performance as a result of increased competition caused by market conditions and pricing pressures in our Chilean operations, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for LA W&S. Due to changes in sales forecasts during fiscal 2014, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Latin America Consumer Product Goods (LA CPG) reporting unit.

units. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of theeach reporting unit to theits carrying value. We estimated the fair value of theeach reporting unitsunit using a combination of: (i) a market approach based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA from recent comparable transactions and other market data; and (ii) an income approach based on expected future cash flows discounted at 17%rates ranging between 8.5% to 11.0% in 2014.2017. The discount rate reflects the additional industry-specific risk corresponding toassociated with each respective reporting unit, including the lower perceived revenueindustry and EBITDA multiples for the industry.geographies in which they operate. The market approach and income approaches were both considered, with the income approach were weighted equallyselected based on judgment of the comparability of the recent transactions due to the fluid nature of the business and recent acquisitions. The market approach was used to corroborate values determined by the risks inherent in estimating future cash flows.income approach. We considered recent economic and industry trends, as well as risk in

executing our current plans from the perspective of a hypothetical buyer in estimating expected future cash flows in the income approach.

For LA CPG,all of our reporting units, the first step of the impairment test did not indicate potential impairment as the estimated fair value of the reporting unitunits exceeded the carrying amount. As a result, the second step of the impairment test was not required. For the LA W&S reporting unit, the first step of the impairment test indicated potential impairment, which was measured in the second step.

The second step measures the implied value of goodwill by subtracting the fair value of our LA W&S reporting unit’s assets and liabilities, including intangible assets, from the fair value of LA W&S as estimated in step 1. The goodwill impairment charge was measured as the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the estimated carrying value. The impairment loss recorded is an estimate, as the step 2 analysis is not complete. The loss of $13,475 is probable and represents management’s best estimate. The fair value appraisals of the fixed assets and lease intangibles were not completed prior to the filing date of this Form 10-K. Once the final step 2 valuations are completed, any resulting adjustments will be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. A change in management and completion of significant workforce reductions during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 did not result in significant improvement in operating results in the fourth quarter, which indicated the existence of potential impairment. If operating performance does not improve in Latin America, the related assets’ carrying values may be impacted and further analysis may be necessary in future quarters.

Significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the LA W&Sour reporting unitunits include estimates of future cash flows, discount raterates and multiples of revenue and EBITDA. These assumptions are typically not considered individually because assumptions used to select one variable should also be considered when selecting other variables; however, sensitivity of the overall fair value assessment to each significant variable is also considered.

In conjunction with our annual impairment test as of January 31, 2016, the 2014 analysis,Company performed a 1% increasequalitative assessment for all but two of our reporting units and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units were less than the carrying values. Due to changes in sales forecasts during fiscal 2016, the selected discount rate would have resulted in $600Company performed the first step of additionalthe two-step goodwill impairment test for the LA CPG reporting unit. As it passed the first step of the fiscal 2015 impairment test by less than 5%, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Asia Pacific Wine & Spirits (AP W&S) reporting unit. For both LA CPG and AP W&S, the first step of the impairment test did not indicate potential impairment as the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount. As a 5% decrease inresult, the selected multiplessecond step of revenue and EBITDA would have resulted in $500 of additional impairment.the impairment test was not required.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over periods of up to 21 years based on a number of assumptions including estimated period of economic benefit and utilization. Intangible assets are tested for impairment when events or

changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than their fair values. Tests are performed over asset groups at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows.

Our intangibleThe Company performed impairment testing on long-lived assets, inincluding intangibles, at certain manufacturing locations during fiscal 2017 and 2016 due to the LA W&S reporting unit consistexistence of customer relationships with definite lives.impairment indicators. The weighted average remaining lives of our LA W&S customer relationships is 17 years. Our intangible assets in our Mexican operations consist of customer relationships with definite lives. The weighted average remaining lives of our Mexican customer relationships is 16 years. The failure of step 1 of the goodwill impairment analysis for LA W&S and changes in sales forecasts for our Mexican operations were impairment indicators in fiscal 2014. As a result, we tested the related intangible assets for impairment by comparing (i) estimates of undiscounted future cash flows, before interest charges, included in the our operating plans versus (ii) the carrying values of the related assets. The undiscounted cash flows associated with the other amortizable intangiblelong-lived assets were greater than thetheir carrying value for both LA W&S and Mexico,values, and therefore, no impairment was present. No impairment indicators existedpresent in 2013 or 2012.either of these two years related to intangible assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired and the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Changes in market conditions and/or losses of a production line could have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income. The determination of whether impairment exists involves various estimates and assumptions, including the determination of the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the assets involved in the review. The cash flow estimates are based upon our historical experience, adjusted to reflect estimated future market and operating conditions. Measurement of an impairment loss requires a determination of fair value. We base our estimates of fair values on quoted market prices when available, independent appraisals as appropriate and industry trends or other market knowledge. Tests are performed over asset groups at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows.

ChangesThe Company recorded $2,006 in market conditions and pricing pressures were impairment indicators for our Chilean business inlosses on fixed assets during fiscal 2014. Changes in sales forecasts were impairment indicators for our Mexican operations in fiscal 2014. Due2016 related to assets that more likely than not will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives, $1,874 of which related to the natureclosure of a start-up operation, we have experienced losses in our Chinese location. As a result, we testedvarious manufacturing facilities. In addition, the relatedCompany performed impairment testing on long-lived assets for impairment.at certain manufacturing locations during fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 due to the existence of other impairment indicators. The estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the long-lived assets in Chile, Mexico and China were greater than their carrying values, and therefore, no impairment was present. No impairment indicators existedpresent in 2013 or 2012.any of these three years related to intangible assets.

Income Taxes

The Company is subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Income taxes are recorded based on the current year amounts payable or refundable. Deferred income taxes are recognized at the enacted tax rates for the expected future tax consequences related to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial reporting purposes as well as any tax attributes. Deferred income taxes are not provided for the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S. that have been permanently reinvested in foreign operations.

We regularly review our deferred income tax balances for each jurisdiction to estimate whether these deferred income tax balances are more likely than not to be realized based on the information currently available. Projected future taxable income is based on forecasted results and assumptions as to the jurisdiction in which the income will be earned. The timing of reversals of any existing temporary differences is based on our methods of accounting for income taxes and current tax legislation. Unless the deferred tax balances are more likely than not to be realized, a valuation allowance is established to reduce the carrying values of any deferred tax balances until circumstances indicate that realization becomes more likely than not.

The Company establishes reserves for income tax related uncertainties based on estimates of whether it is more likely than not that the tax uncertainty would be sustained upon challenge by the appropriate tax authorities which would then result in additional taxes, penalties and interest due.authorities. Provisions for and changes to these reserves and any related net interest and penalties are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Significant judgment is required when evaluating our tax provisions and determining our provision for income taxes. We regularly review our tax positions and we adjust the reserves as circumstances change.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the Company uses a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the use of observable inputs. The three levels are:

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment.

The Company has three non-amortizing interest rate Swaps with a total notional amount of $125,000 at March 31, 2014 to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates. The Company adjusts the carrying value of these derivatives to their estimated fair values and records the adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company has entered into multiple forward contracts to fix the purchase price in U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated firm commitments to purchase presses and other equipment. The forward contracts are designated as fair value hedges. The Company adjusts the carrying value of the derivative to the estimated fair value and records the adjustment in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities are primarily used in goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets impairment analyses, the valuation of acquired intangibles and in the valuation of assets held for sale. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually, as of the last day of FebruaryJanuary of each fiscal year. Impairment is also tested when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than the fair values. Goodwill and intangible assets are typically valued using Level 3 inputs.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revisedFor a discussion of new accounting guidance on the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment requires an entitypronouncements, see Note 2 to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income if the amount is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. This guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012, which for the Company was the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2013. We chose to present the new disclosure requirements in the notes to theour consolidated financial statements (see Note 19 of the consolidated financial statements).statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

(In thousands, except for statistical data)

Multi-Color does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, but we may utilize them to manage our fixed to variable-rate debt ratio or to manage foreign currency exchange rate volatility.

Multi-Color is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates on certain of its outstanding debt. The outstanding loan balance under our Credit FacilityAgreement bears interest at a variable rate based on prevailing short-term interest rates in the United States and Australia. In April 2008, the

The Company entered into two interest rate swaps (Swaps), a $40,000 non-amortizing Swap and a $40,000 amortizing Swap, to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates. The Swaps expired in February 2013 and resulted in interest payments based on fixed rates of 3.45% for the non-amortizing Swap and 3.04% for the amortizing Swap, plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility ranging from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio (see Note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements). In October 2011, in connection with the draw down of the $315,000 term loan for the acquisition of York Label Group, the Company entered intohad three forward starting non-amortizing Swaps forwith a total notional amount of $125,000 to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Swaps became effective October 2012 and expireexpired in August 2016. The Swaps resultresulted in interest payments based on an average fixed rate of 1.396% plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility. Based on the outstanding debt at March 31, 2014, a 100 basis point change in the interest rate would change interest expense by approximately $3,544 annually.Agreement.

Foreign currency exchange risk arises from our international operations in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Central America, Chile, China, Europe, Southeast Asia, and South Africa as well as from transactions with customers or suppliers denominated in foreign currencies. The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries is generally the currency of the country in which the subsidiary operates. The results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for each monthly period. As foreign exchange rates change, there are changes to the U.S. dollar equivalent of sales and expenses denominated in foreign currencies. During fiscal 2014,2017, approximately 37%45% of our net sales were made by our foreign subsidiaries and their combined net income was 18%26% of the Company’s net income prior to the $13,475 impairment charge to goodwill.income.

The balance sheets of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rates of each monthly balance sheet date. During fiscal 2014,2017, the Company recorded an unrealized foreign currency translation loss of $6,753$25,254 in other comprehensive income as a result of movements in foreign currency exchange rates related to the ArgentineanArgentine Peso, Australian Dollar, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Chilean Peso, Chinese Yuan, Euro, Indonesian Rupiah, Malaysian Ringgit, Mexican Peso, Philippine Peso, Polish Zloty, South African Rand, Swiss Franc, and the Swiss Franc.Thai Baht. See Notes 2 and 19 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As of March 31, 2014,2017, a 10% change in these foreign exchange rates would change shareholders’ equity by approximately $30,000.$44,000. This hypothetical change was calculated by multiplying the net assets of each of our foreign subsidiaries by a 10% change in the applicable foreign exchange rate.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

   Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsFirm

  31-3331-32

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

  33

34

35


Consolidated Balance Sheets

  3635

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

  3736

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  3837

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  3938

All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either not required or the information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Multi-Color Corporation:Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Multi-Color Corporation (an Ohio corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company)“Company”) as of March 31, 2014,2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2014.2017. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.audits.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014,2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2014,2017 in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in the 2013Internal Control – Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated June 13, 2014May 30, 2017 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.unqualified opinion.

/s/ KPMGGRANT THORNTON LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

June 13, 2014May 30, 2017

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Multi-Color Corporation:Corporation

We have audited Multi-Color Corporation’s and subsidiaries (the Company)the internal control over financial reporting of Multi-Color Corporation (an Ohio corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in the 2013Internal Control – Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting (Item9A(b)(“Management’s Report”). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. Our audit of, and opinion on, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not include the internal control over financial reporting of Industria Litografica Alessandrina S.r.l (“I.L.A.”), Italstereo Resin Labels S.r.l (“Italstereo”), Gironde Imprimerie Publicite (“GIP”) and Graphix Labels and Packing Pty Ltd (“Graphix”), whose financial statements reflect total assets and revenues constituting 4.1% and 1.2% percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended March 31, 2017. As indicated in Management’s Report, I.L.A., Italstereo, GIP and Graphix were acquired during the year ended March 31, 2017. Management’s assertion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting excluded internal control over financial reporting of I.L.A., Italstereo, GIP and Graphix.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also includedrisk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses related to an insufficient complement of corporate accounting and finance personnel to design and execute an effective system of internal control, general information technology controls intended to restrict access to applications and data, and the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over the accounting for significant transactions have been identified and included in management’s assessment.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in the 2013Internal Control – Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

The Company acquired six businesses during the year ended March 31, 2014, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014, the six acquired businesses’ internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $177.9 million and total net revenues of $48.8 million included in the consolidated financial statements of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended March 31, 2014. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiaries also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the acquired businesses.COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheetfinancial statements of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiariesthe Company as of March 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the periodyear ended March 31, 2014. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing,2017, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of those consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated June 13, 2014, whichMay 30, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

June 13, 2014

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Multi-Color Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Multi-Color Corporation (an Ohio corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

June 14, 2013May 30, 2017

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Years Ended March 31

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016   2015 

Net revenues

  $706,432   $659,815   $510,247    $923,295  $870,825   $810,772 

Cost of revenues

   574,375   533,464   411,963     726,486  689,199    637,498 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Gross profit

   132,057    126,351    98,284     196,809  181,626    173,274 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   57,293    54,115    51,551     84,922  81,998    68,012 

Facility closure expense

   1,166    1,531    1,182  

Facility closure expenses

   921  5,200    7,399 

Goodwill impairment

   13,475    —      —       —     —      951 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Operating income

   60,123    70,705    45,551     110,966  94,428    96,912 

Interest expense

   21,776    22,237    15,010     25,488  25,751    26,386 

Other income, net

   (5,910  (219  (583

Other expense (income), net

   (2,735 1,867    (346
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Income before income taxes

   44,257    48,687    31,124     88,213  66,810    70,872 

Income tax expense

   16,033    18,387    11,456     26,848  18,981    25,156 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net income

   28,224    30,300    19,668     61,365  47,829    45,716 

Loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   —      —      32  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   369  90    —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

  $28,224   $30,300   $19,700    $60,996  $47,739   $45,716 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding:

         

Basic

   16,342    16,145    14,662     16,879  16,750    16,623 

Diluted

   16,599    16,332    14,903     17,024  16,952    16,877 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $1.73   $1.88   $1.34    $3.61  $2.85   $2.75 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $1.70   $1.86   $1.32    $3.58  $2.82   $2.71 

Dividends per common share

  $0.20   $0.20   $0.20    $0.20  $0.20   $0.20 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the Years Ended March 31

(In thousands)

 

   2014  2013  2012 

Net income including non-controlling interests

  $28,224   $30,300   $19,668  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Unrealized foreign currency translation loss (1)

   (6,753  (6,589  (5,580

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax (2)

   877    (724  81  

Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax (3)

   226    (14  (234
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (5,650  (7,327  (5,733
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   22,574    22,973    13,935  

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests

   —      —      32  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

  $22,574   $22,973   $13,967  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2017  2016  2015 

Net income

  $61,365  $47,829  $45,716 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Unrealized foreign currency translation loss (1)

   (25,254  (2,671  (56,200

Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax (2)

   196   485   563 

Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax (3)

   174   35   (169
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   (24,884  (2,151  (55,806
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   36,481   45,678   (10,090

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   157   163   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

  $36,324  $45,515  $(10,090
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)Amount is not net of tax as the earnings are reinvested within foreign jurisdictions. The amountsamount for the years ended March 31, 20132017, 2016 and 2012 include2015 includes a tax impact of $284, $(277) and $455,$1,002, respectively, related to the settlement of a Euroforeign currency denominated loan.intercompany loans.

(2)Amounts are net of tax of $555, $454$(133), $(303) and $51$(353) for the years ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

(3)Amounts are net of tax of $142, $9$(108), $(22) and $146$106 for the years ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of March 31

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  2014 2013   2017 2016 

ASSETS

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $10,020   $15,737    $25,229  $27,709 

Accounts receivable, net

   118,906   102,996     141,211  134,920 

Other receivables

   6,737   4,257     7,871  8,807 

Inventories, net

   56,296   48,734     63,995  61,191 

Deferred income tax assets

   11,144   9,796  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   10,321   9,024  

Prepaid expenses

   12,187  13,618 

Other current assets

   3,253  2,280 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   213,424    190,544     253,746  248,525 

Assets held for sale

   60    60  

Property, plant and equipment, net

   194,589    178,552     247,261  221,295 

Goodwill

   391,690    347,671     412,550  422,009 

Intangible assets, net

   155,943    116,785     169,220  169,146 

Deferred financing fees and other non-current assets

   7,619    5,271  

Other non-current assets

   6,365  5,773 

Deferred income tax assets

   1,141    667     2,848  3,318 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $964,466   $839,550    $1,091,990  $1,070,066 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      

Current liabilities:

      

Current portion of long-term debt

  $42,648   $23,946    $2,093  $1,573 

Accounts payable

   69,405    61,759     88,475  82,958 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   44,378    36,732     53,758  52,894 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   156,431    122,437     144,326  137,425 

Long-term debt

   435,554    378,910     479,408  504,706 

Deferred income tax liabilities

   56,561    43,115     65,761  65,798 

Other liabilities

   18,173    20,064     20,675  19,505 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   666,719    564,526     710,170  727,434 

Commitments and contingencies

      

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding

   —      —       —     —   

Common stock, no par value, stated value of $0.10 per share; 25,000 shares authorized, 16,571 and 16,246 shares issued at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

   994    971  

Common stock, no par value, stated value of $0.10 per share; 40,000 shares authorized, 17,254 and 17,111 shares issued at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

   1,054  1,040 

Paid-in capital

   132,344    126,174     158,399  150,783 

Treasury stock, 161 and 89 shares at cost at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

   (3,760  (1,114

Restricted stock

   (717  (591

Treasury stock, 302 and 293 shares at cost at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

   (11,168 (10,556

Retained earnings

   172,052    147,100     316,461  258,848 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   (3,166  2,484  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (85,795 (61,123
  

 

  

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

   378,951  338,992 

Noncontrolling interests

   2,869  3,640 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   297,747    275,024     381,820  342,632 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $964,466   $839,550    $1,091,990  $1,070,066 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

 

  Common Stock                                    
  Number
of Shares
Issued
   Amount   Paid-In
Capital
   Treasury
Stock
 Restricted
Stock
 Non-
Controlling
Interest
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total  Common Stock       

Accumulated

Other

     

March 31, 2011

   13,394    $677    $73,374    $(647 $(400 $—     $103,278   $15,544   $191,826  

Net income (loss)

          (32 19,700    19,668  
 Shares
Issued
 Amount Paid-In
Capital
 Treasury
Stock
 Retained
Earnings
 Comprehensive
Loss
 Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total 

March 31, 2014

 16,571  $989  $131,632  $(3,760 $172,052  $(3,166 $—    $297,747 

Net income

     45,716    45,716 

Other comprehensive loss

            (5,733 (5,733      (55,806  (55,806

Acquisition of non-controlling interest

          939     939  

Non-controlling interest activity

          (65   (65

Buy-out of non-controlling interest

          (842   (842

Issuance of common stock

   2,813     280     48,496         48,776   324  32  5,483      5,515 

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

       338         338  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   2,644      2,644 

Restricted stock grant

     1     249     (250     —     11         —   

Share-based compensation

       787     275      1,062  

Stock-based compensation

   1,970      1,970 

Shares acquired under employee plans

   1         (8     (8    (5,008    (5,008

Common stock dividends

           (2,941  (2,941     (3,305   (3,305
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

March 31, 2012

   16,208    $958    $123,244    $(655 $(375 $—     $120,037   $9,811   $253,020  

March 31, 2015

 16,906  $1,021  $141,729  $(8,768 $214,463  $(58,972 $—    $289,473 

Net income

           30,300    30,300       47,739   90  47,829 

Other comprehensive loss

            (7,327 (7,327

Other comprehensive income (loss)

      (2,151 73  (2,078

Acquisitions

       3,477  3,477 

Issuance of common stock

   127     11     1,261         1,272   190  19  4,065      4,084 

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

       200         200  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   2,007      2,007 

Restricted stock grant

     2     518     (520     —     15         —   

Share-based compensation

       951     304      1,255  

Stock-based compensation

   2,982      2,982 

Shares acquired under employee plans

         (459     (459    (1,788    (1,788

Common stock dividends

           (3,237  (3,237     (3,354   (3,354
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

March 31, 2013

   16,335    $971    $126,174    $(1,114 $(591 $—     $147,100   $2,484   $275,024  

March 31, 2016

 17,111  $1,040  $150,783  $(10,556 $258,848  $(61,123 $3,640  $342,632 

Net income

           28,224    28,224        60,996    369   61,365 

Other comprehensive loss

            (5,650)  (5,650)        (24,672  (212  (24,884

Acquisitions

        62   62 

Issuance of common stock

   220     21     3,901         3,922    136   14   3,338       3,352 

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

       648         648  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

    1,258       1,258 

Restricted stock grant

   16     2     518     (520)     —      8         —   

Share-based compensation

       1,103     394      1,497  

Restricted stock forfeitures

  (1        —   

Stock-based compensation

    3,042       3,042 

Shares acquired under employee plans

         (846)      (846)      (612     (612

Treasury stock purchase in settlement of claim

         (1,800)      (1,800) 

Buyout of noncontrolling interest

    (22     (492  (514

Common stock dividends

           (3,272)   (3,272)       (3,383    (3,383

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

        (498  (498
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

March 31, 2014

   16,571    $994    $132,344    $(3,760)  $(717)  $—     $172,052   $(3,166)  $297,747  

March 31, 2017

  17,254  $1,054  $158,399  $(11,168 $316,461  $(85,795 $2,869  $381,820 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended March 31

(In thousands)

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

        

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

  $28,224   $30,300   $19,700  

Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Net income

  $61,365  $47,829  $45,716 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

   27,995   26,851   20,718     33,480  31,295  29,828 

Amortization of intangible assets

   9,823   9,493   6,456     14,425  13,178  11,541 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   2,057   1,979   1,474     1,665  1,692  2,200 

Goodwill impairment charge

   13,475    —      —    

Net loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment

   539   402   (160

Loss on write-off of deferred financing fees

   —      —     490     —     —    2,001 

Stock based compensation expense

   1,497   1,255   1,062  

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

   (648 (200 (338

Impairment loss on fixed assets

   —    132  777 

Facility closure expenses related to impairment loss on fixed assets

   —    1,874  5,208 

Goodwill impairment

   —     —    951 

Gain on sale of Watertown facility

   —    (476  —   

Loss (gain) on benefit plans related to facility closures

   133  88  (726

Gain on previously held equity interests

   (690  —     —   

Net (gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

   (230 282  199 

Net (gain) loss on interest rate swaps

   103  (276 351 

Stock-based compensation expense

   3,042  2,982  1,970 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   (1,258 (2,007 (2,644

Deferred income taxes, net

   6,482   7,634   5,649     (2,938 2,343  6,944 

Gain on settlement of claim

   (3,800  —      —    

Net decrease (increase) in accounts receivable

   4,825   (812 (1,766

Net decrease (increase) in inventories

   34   (2,458 3,544  

Net (increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

   (186 104   225  

Net decrease in accounts payable

   (6,088 (3,891 (2,389

Net (decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (3,612 (944 1,812  

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

   (7,457 (5,412 1,953 

Inventories

   (1,999 3,273  (1,048

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   1,067  (10,581 1,811 

Accounts payable

   171  11,773  (4,095

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   6,331  1,412  4,038 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   80,617    69,713    56,477     107,210  99,401  106,975 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

        

Capital expenditures

   (30,365  (28,638  (23,008   (46,146 (34,892 (29,153

Investment in acquisitions, net of cash acquired

   (133,499  (15,979  (275,872   (28,839 (103,245 (31,240

Short-term refunds on equipment

   5,568    —      —    

Proceeds from sale of Kansas City facility

   —      625    —    

Proceeds from sale of Watertown and Norway facilities

   —    2,505   —   

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

   4,921    1,343    4,021     1,350  600  471 

Other

   —      —      (32
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (153,375  (42,649  (294,891   (73,635 (135,032 (59,922
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

        

Borrowings under revolving lines of credit

   239,342    200,868    155,115     265,746  362,960  323,895 

Payments under revolving lines of credit

   (212,401  (173,619  (198,734   (292,797 (309,621 (227,818

Borrowings of long-term debt

   76,872    1,234    316,962     2,156  823  251,896 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (30,589  (28,200  (17,460

Payment of York deferred payment

   (3,129  (14,380  —    

Treasury stock purchase in settlement of claim

   (1,800  —      —    

Payment of Labelgraphics deferred payment

   —      (5,049  —    

Payment of acquisition related contingent consideration

   —      —      (12,186

Repayments of long-term debt

   (6,572 (9,165 (367,868

Payment of acquisition related contingent consideration and deferred payments

   (1,784 (1,141 (10,916

Buyout of non-controlling interest

   (514  —     —   

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   3,177    994    1,249     2,742  2,706  2,019 

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

   648    200    338  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   1,258  2,007  2,644 

Debt issuance costs

   (1,364  —      (8,562   —    (18 (7,921

Dividends paid

   (3,276  (3,237  (2,941   (3,876 (3,351 (3,302
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

   67,480    (21,189  233,781     (33,641 45,200  (37,371
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash

   (439  (152  (505   (2,414 91  (1,653
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (5,717  5,723    (5,138

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (2,480 9,660  8,029 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

   15,737    10,014    15,152     27,709  18,049  10,020 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $10,020   $15,737   $10,014    $25,229  $27,709  $18,049 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except for statistical and per share data)

(1) THE COMPANY

(1)THE COMPANY

Multi-Color Corporation (Multi-Color, MCC, we, us, our or the Company), headquartered near Cincinnati, Ohio, is a leader in global label solutions supporting a number of the world’s most prominent brands including leading producers of home & personal care, wine & spirit,spirits, food & beverage, healthcare and specialty consumer products. MCC serves international brand owners in North, Central and South America, Europe, China, Southeast Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa and China with a comprehensive range of the latest label technologies in Pressure Sensitive, Glue-Applied (Cut and Stack), In-Mold, Shrink Sleeve and Heat Transfer.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(2)SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

References to 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 are for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively. The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year classifications.

As of March 31, 2014,2017, the Company’s operations were conducted through the Consumer Product Goods and Wine & SpiritSpirits operating segments, which are aggregated into one reportable segment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting.” The metrics used by management to assess the performance of the Company’s operating segments include revenue trends, gross profit margin and operating margin. The Company’s operating segments have historically had similar economic characteristics and are expected to have similar economic characteristics and long-term financial performance in future periods.

Use of Estimates in Financial Statements

In preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Combinations

The Company allocates the purchase price of its acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values at the acquisition date. The Company utilizes management estimates and an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in determining these fair values. The excess of the acquisition price over the estimated fair value of the net assets is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is adjusted for any changes to acquisition date fair value amounts made within the measurement period. Acquisition-related transaction costs are recognized separately from the business combination and expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue on sales of products when the customer receives title to the goods and risk of loss transfers to the customer, which is generally upon shipment or delivery depending on sales terms, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues are generally denominated in the currency of the country from which the product is shipped and are net of applicable returns and discounts.

In addition, the Company also recognizes revenues related to multiple-element arrangements with both pre-press activities and traditional label revenues. These pre-press charges are specific to the customer and product under contract and the output generated has no marketable use outside of the label production process for the specific contract run. We have only one deliverable for revenue recognition and a single unit of accounting. As such, to the extent that revenue for these pre-press activities is separately billed, it is deferred and recognized over the period of the associated label runs. These label runs range from a single production run to ongoing runs over an average of 3-4 months. The associated costs are also deferred and recognized over the same period.

Shipping fees billed to customers are included in net revenues and shipping costs are included in cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of income. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities in applicable jurisdictions are excluded from net revenues.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues primarily consists of direct materials and supplies consumed in the manufacture of product, as well as manufacturing labor, depreciation expense and direct overhead expense necessary to acquire and convert the purchased materials and supplies into finished product. Cost of revenues also includes inbound freight costs and costs to distribute products to customers.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) primarily consist of sales and marketing costs, corporate and divisional administrative and other costs and depreciation and amortization expense related to non-manufacturing assets. Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred and were minimal in 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and were $4,751, $3,763$5,274, $5,520 and $3,494$4,619 in 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company records all highly liquid short-term investments with maturities of three months or less as cash equivalents. At March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company had cash in foreign bank accounts of $6,400$24,656 and $7,699,$25,483, respectively. Outstanding checks of $8,876 and $6,574 were included in accounts payable as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Accounts Receivable

Our customers are primarily major consumer product, food & beverage, and wine & spirit companiesspirits and container manufacturers.companies. Accounts receivable consist of amounts due from customers in connection with our normal business activities and are carried at sales value less allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is established to reflect the expected losses of accounts receivable based on past collection history, age, account payment status compared to invoice payment terms and specific individual risks identified. The delinquency of a receivable account is determined based on these factors. The Company does not accrue interest on aged accounts receivable. Allowances

Supply Chain Financing

During 2015, the Company entered into supply chain financing agreements with two of its customers. The receivables for both the agreements are sold without recourse to the customers’ banks and are accounted for as sales of accounts receivable. Gains and losses on the sale of these receivables are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income, and losses of $561, $363 and $67 were recorded during 2017, 2016 and charged to expense when an account is determined to be uncollectible.2015, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value and substantially all are maintained using the FIFO (first-in, first-out) or specific identification method. Excess and obsolete cost reductionsinventory allowances are generally established based on inventory age.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost.cost, net of accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation expense, which includes the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases, is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the remaining terms of the leases, as follows:

 

Buildings

Building improvements

   

20-39 years

15 years

 

Machinery and equipment

   3-15 years 

Computers

   3-5 years 

Furniture and fixtures

   5-10 years 

Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

Impairment reviews comparing fair value to carrying value are highly judgmental and involve the use of significant estimates and assumptions, which determine whether there is potential impairment and the amount of any impairment charge recorded. Fair value assessments involve estimates of discounted cash flows that are dependent upon discount rates and long-term assumptions regarding future sales and margin trends, market conditions, cash flow and multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Actual results may differ from these estimates. Fair value measurements used in the impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets are Level 3 measurements, as described in Note 20.measurements. See further information about our policy for fair value measurements within this section below and in Note 20.below. See further information regarding our impairment tests in Note 7.

Goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized and is reviewedtested for impairment annually, as of the last day of February of each fiscal year.annually. Impairment is also tested when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than the fair values. Historically, the Company’s policy was to perform the annual goodwill impairment test as of the last day of February of each fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal 2016, the Company moved from accelerated filer status to large accelerated filer status. As a result, the Form 10-K was required to be filed 15 days earlier than in previous years. In order to meet the shorter filing timeline, the Company changed its annual goodwill impairment testing date from the last day of February to the last day of January of each fiscal year, beginning in fiscal 2016. This change in the goodwill impairment testing date represents a change in accounting principle, which management determined to be preferable under the circumstances. The Company determined that it is impracticable to objectively determine projected cash flows and related valuation estimates that would have been used as of January 31, 2016 for periods prior to January 31, 2016 without the use of hindsight. Therefore, this change was applied prospectively on January 31, 2016.

Goodwill has been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Company’s divisions. The Company can evaluate qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying value. We estimateThe market and income approaches were both considered, with the fair value using a combination of: (i) aincome approach selected based on judgement of the comparability of recent transactions due to the fluid nature of the business and recent acquisitions. The market approach based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA from recent comparable transactions and other market data; and (ii) anwas used to corroborate values determined by the income approach based on expected future discounted cash flows.approach.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over periods of up to 21 years based on a number of assumptions including estimated period of economic benefit and utilization. Intangible assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than their fair values. We test for impairment by comparing (i) estimates of undiscounted future cash flows, before interest charges, included in the our operating plans to (ii) the carrying values of the related assets. Tests are performed over asset groups at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired and the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Changes in market conditions and/or losses of a production line could have a material

impact on the consolidated statements of income. The determination of whether impairment exists involves various estimates and assumptions, including the determination of the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the assets involved in the review. The cash flow estimates are based upon our historical experience, adjusted to reflect estimated future market and operating conditions. Measurement of an impairment loss requires a determination of fair value. We base our estimates of fair values on quoted market prices when available, independent appraisals as appropriate and industry trends or other market knowledge. Tests are performed over asset groups at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows.

Income Taxes

The Company is subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Income taxes are recorded based on the current year amounts payable or refundable. Deferred income taxes are recognized at the enacted tax rates for the expected future tax consequences related to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial reporting purposes as well as any tax attributes. Deferred income taxes are not provided for the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S. that have been permanently reinvested in foreign operations.

We regularly review our deferred income tax balances for each jurisdiction to estimate whether these deferred income tax balances are more likely than not to be realized based on the information currently available. Projected future taxable income is based on forecasted results and assumptions as to the jurisdiction in which the income will be earned. The timing of reversals of any existing temporary differences is based on our methods of accounting for income taxes and current tax legislation. Unless the deferred tax balances are

more likely than not to be realized, a valuation allowance is established to reduce the carrying values of any deferred tax balances until circumstances indicate that realization becomes more likely than not.

The Company establishes reserves for income tax related uncertainties based on estimates of whether it is more likely than not that the tax uncertainty would be sustained upon challenge by the appropriate tax authorities which would then result in additional taxes, penalties and interest due.authorities. Provisions for and changes to these reserves and any related net interest and penalties are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Significant judgment is required when evaluating our tax provisions and determining our provision for income taxes. We regularly review our tax positions and we adjust the reserves as circumstances change.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares outstanding during the period consist of restricted shares and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and are reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments by recognizing derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and recognizing the resulting gains or losses as adjustments to the consolidated statements of income or accumulated other comprehensive income.income (loss). The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company manages interest costs using a mixture of fixed rate and variable rate debt. Additionally, the Company enters into interest rate swaps (Swaps) whereby it agrees to exchange with a counterparty, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount.

The Company’sUpon inception, the Swaps have beenwere designated as effectivea cash flow hedges at inception. Thehedge, and the Company evaluates effectivenessadjusted the carrying value of these derivatives to their estimated fair value and recorded the adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In conjunction with entering into the Credit Agreement on an ongoing quarterly basis and therefore, anyNovember 21, 2014, the Company de-designated the Swaps as a cash flow hedge. Subsequent to November 21, 2014, changes in the fair value of the de-designated Swaps are recordedimmediately recognized in other comprehensive income. If a hedge or portion thereof were determined to be ineffective, any changes in fair value would be recorded in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.interest expense.

The Company manages foreign currency exchange rate risk of foreign currency denominated firm commitments to purchase presses and other equipment by periodically entering into foreign currency forward currency contracts. TheIn addition, the Company periodically enters into short-term foreign currency forward contracts have beento fix the U.S. dollar value of certain intercompany loan payments, which settle in the following quarter. If designated as effectivea fair value hedges at inception. The Company evaluates effectiveness on an ongoing quarterly basis and therefore, anyhedge, changes in the fair value of a contract are recorded in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income to offsetin the foreign currency effectsame period during which the related hedged item affects the consolidated statements of income. The Company evaluates effectiveness on an ongoing quarterly basis. If not designated as a hedging instrument, changes in the transactions.fair value of a contract are immediately recognized in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of financial instruments approximates fair value.

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the Company uses a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the use of observable inputs. The three levels are:

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment.

The Company has three non-amortizing interest rate Swaps with a total notional amount of $125,000 at March 31, 2014 to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates. The Company adjusts the carrying value of these derivatives to their estimated fair values and records the adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company has entered into multiple forward contracts to fix the purchase price in U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated firm commitments to purchase presses and other equipment. The forward contracts are designated as fair value hedges. The Company adjusts the carrying value of the derivative to the estimated fair value and records the adjustment in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities are primarily used in goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets impairment analyses, the valuation of acquired intangibles and in the valuation of assets held for sale. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually, as of the last day of FebruaryJanuary of each fiscal year. Impairment is also tested when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying values may be greater than the fair values. Goodwill and intangible assets are typically valued using Level 3 inputs.

Foreign Exchange

The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries is generally the currency of the country in which the subsidiary operates. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated using period end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during each period. Translation gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of stockholders’ equity and were a loss of $6,753$25,254, $2,671 and $6,589$56,200 during fiscal 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Transaction gains and losses(losses) are reported in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.income and were ($533), $2,185 and ($117) during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013,January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) issued revisedASU 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other,” which simplifies the accounting guidance on the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment requires an entity to present, either on the facefor goodwill impairments. This update removes step 2 of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income ifgoodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount is requiredby which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to be reclassified to net income in its entirety inexceed the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts.carrying amount of goodwill. This guidanceupdate is effective prospectivelyfor any annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, which for the Company is any annual or interim goodwill impairments performed after April 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for any impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations,” which revises the definition of a business. The FASB’s new framework will assist entities in evaluating whether a set (integrated set of assets and activities) should be accounted for as an acquisition of a business or a group of assets. The framework adds an initial screen to determine if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets. If that screen is met, the set is not a business. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The specific issues addressed include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012,2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018. The amendments in this update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies several areas of accounting for employee share-based payments, including the accounting for income taxes and forfeitures and the classification of excess tax benefits and employee taxes paid when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes. This ASU requires that excess tax benefits for share-based payments be recognized as income tax expense and classified within operating cash flows rather than being recorded within additional paid-in capital and classified within financing cash flows. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. The Company will adopt the update effective April 1, 2017. Due to the nature of share-based payment exercise patterns, the Company will not know all potential impacts of the update until the end of the quarter in which the standard is adopted. The Company believes the most significant impact will come from the amendments related to accounting for excess tax benefits, which will result in recognition of excess tax benefits against income tax expenses rather than additional paid-in capital.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which requires that lessees recognize almost all leases on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, leases will be classified as either finance leases or operating leases. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2019. This update should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements, which will include an increase in both assets and liabilities relating to its leasing activities.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments,” which eliminated the requirement for an acquirer in a business combination to account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, acquirers must recognize measurement-period adjustments during the period in which they determine the amounts, including the effect on earnings of any amounts they would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company was the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2013.2016. This update was applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occurred after the effective date. See Note 7 for additional disclosures provided as a result of adoption of this ASU, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This update does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. Prior to issuance of this ASU, inventory was measured at the lower of cost or market (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and a floor of net realizable value less normal profit margin). For inventory within the scope of the new guidance, entities will be required to compare the cost of inventory to only its net realizable value, and not to the three measures required by current guidance. This update is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2017. The Company will adopt the update effective April 1, 2017, and it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, “Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” which provides criteria for determining whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. This update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company was the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2016. We choseelected to apply this update prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Under previous accounting guidance, debt issuance costs were recognized as a deferred charge (an asset). The recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs are not affected by this update, only the presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This update is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company was the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2016. The Company’s adoption of this update, as of the effective date, is a change in accounting principle.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.” This update adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company elected to present all debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, including those related to our line-of-credit arrangements. As a result, $1,665 and $6,335 were reclassified from prepaid expenses and other non-current assets, respectively, to long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016. See Note 8 for additional information on debt issuance costs.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which provides revised guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue for transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This guidance provides five steps that should be applied to achieve that core principle. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of this standard by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, which for the Company is the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations for Topic 606. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, which clarifies the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, which further clarifies and removes inconsistencies in ASU 2014-09 guidance. These updates can be applied retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment (modified retrospective) as of the date of adoption. The Company has begun its process for implementing this guidance, including a review of all revenue streams to identify any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. The Company plans to adopt the new disclosure requirementsrevenue guidance and these updates for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach and is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

No other new accounting pronouncement issued or effective during the fiscal year had or is expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

(3)ACQUISITIONS

Super Enterprise Holdings Berhad (Super Label) Summary

On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired 90% of the shares of Super Label based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, which was publicly listed on the Malaysian stock exchange. During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2016, the Company acquired the remaining shares and delisted Super Label. Super Label has operations in Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and China and produces home & personal care, food and beverage and specialty consumer products labels. This acquisition expanded our presence in China and gave us access to new label markets in Southeast Asia.

The acquisition included an 80% controlling interest in the noteslabel operations in Indonesia and a 60% controlling interest in certain legal entities in Malaysia and China. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company acquired the remaining shares of the label operations in Indonesia for $514. The results of Super Label’s operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on August 11, 2015.

The purchase price for Super Label consisted of the following:

Cash from proceeds of borrowings

  $39,782

Net cash acquired

   (6,035
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $33,747 
  

 

 

 

The cash portion of the purchase price was funded through borrowings under our Credit Agreement (see Note 8). Net cash acquired included $8,152 of cash acquired less $2,117 of bank debt assumed. The Company spent $1,434 in acquisition expenses related to the Super Label acquisition. These expenses were recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $7 in fiscal 2017 and $1,427 in fiscal 2016.

Barat Group (Barat) Summary

On May 4, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Barat based in Bordeaux, France. Barat operates four manufacturing facilities in Bordeaux and Burgundy, France, and the acquisition gives the Company access to the label market in the Bordeaux wine region and expands our presence in Burgundy. The acquisition included a 30% minority interest in Gironde Imprimerie Publicité (GIP), which was accounted for under the cost method based upon Multi-Color’s inability to exercise significant influence over the business. The results of Barat’s operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on May 4, 2015.

The purchase price for Barat consisted of the following:

Cash from proceeds of borrowings

  $47,813 

Deferred payment

   2,160 
  

 

 

 

Purchase price, before cash acquired

   49,973 

Net cash acquired

   (746
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $49,227 
  

 

 

 

The cash portion of the purchase price was funded through the Credit Agreement (see Note 8). The purchase price included $2,160 due to the seller, which was paid during the three months ended September 30, 2015. Net cash acquired included $4,444 of cash acquired less $3,698 of bank debt assumed related to capital leases. The Company spent $1,500 in acquisition expenses related to the Barat acquisition. These expenses were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $12 in fiscal 2017, $816 in fiscal 2016 and $672 in fiscal 2015.

In conjunction with the acquisition of Barat, the Company recorded an indemnification asset of $1,115, which represents the seller’s obligation under the purchase agreement to indemnify Multi-Color for the outcome of potential contingent liabilities relating to uncertain tax positions.

Purchase Price Allocation and Other Items

Based on fair value estimates, the purchase prices for Super Label and Barat have been allocated to individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

   Super Label   Barat 

Assets Acquired:

    

Net cash acquired

  $6,035   $746 

Accounts receivable

   8,479    8,489 

Inventories

   4,276    2,863 

Property, plant and equipment

   22,002    8,356 

Intangible assets

   2,437    21,852 

Goodwill

   8,668    23,391 

Other assets

   1,984    2,794 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

   53,881    68,491 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities Assumed:

    

Accounts payable

   5,087    3,049 

Accrued income taxes payable

   936    355 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   1,725    7,043 

Deferred tax liabilities

   2,874    8,071 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

   10,622    18,518 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

   43,259    49,973 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests

   (3,477   —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets acquired attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

  $39,782   $49,973 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

During fiscal 2017, goodwill decreased by $4,741 related to measurement period adjustments for the Super Label acquisition, primarily $4,601 and $1,683 related to the final valuation of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, respectively, partially offset by an increase of $1,654 related to the final valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities. No material measurement period adjustments related to Super Label were recognized in the consolidated statements of income in fiscal 2017 that would have been recognized in previous periods if the adjustments to provisional amounts were recognized as of the acquisition date.

During fiscal 2016, goodwill increased by $7,328 related to measurement period adjustments for the Super Label acquisition. This increase was primarily due to a measurement period adjustment of $6,321 related to the fair value of the noncontrolling interests acquired and $2,428 in additional purchase price paid in conjunction with the compulsory acquisition of the remaining shares of Super Label during the third quarter of fiscal 2016, partially offset by decreases related to the preliminary valuation of intangible assets of $754 and updated valuation of current and deferred tax assets and liabilities.

During fiscal 2016, goodwill decreased by $15,053 related to measurement period adjustments for the Barat acquisition. This decrease was primarily due to completion of the valuation of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment of $21,852 and $1,497, respectively, partially offset by an increase of $7,956 due to completion of the final valuation of current and deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The fair value of the noncontrolling interests for Super Label were estimated based on market valuations performed by an independent third party using a combination of: (i) an income approach based on expected future discounted cash flows; and (ii) an asset approach.

The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets and their estimated useful lives are as follows:

   Super Label   Barat
   Fair Value   Useful Lives   Fair Value   Useful Lives

Customer relationships

  $2,437    15 years   $20,849   20 years

Non-compete agreements

   —      —      780   2 years

Trademarks

   —      —      223   1 year
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total identifiable intangible assets

  $2,437     $21,852   
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives based upon a number of assumptions including the estimated period of economic benefit and utilization. The weighted-average amortization period for identifiable intangible assets acquired in the Barat acquisition is 19 years.

The goodwill for Super Label is attributable to access to the label markets in Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand and the acquired workforce. The goodwill for Barat is attributable to access to the label market in the Bordeaux wine region and the acquired workforce. Goodwill arising from the Super Label and Barat acquisitions is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Below is a roll forward of the goodwill acquired from the acquisition date to March 31, 2017:

   Super Label   Barat 

Balance at acquisition date

  $8,668   $23,391 

Foreign exchange impact

   (716   (1,035
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2017

  $7,952   $22,356 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accounts receivable acquired as part of the Super Label acquisition had a fair value of $8,479 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustments was $8,809 and the estimated contractual cash flows not expected to be collected are $330. The accounts receivable acquired as part of the Barat acquisition had a fair value of $8,489 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustments was $8,679 and the estimated contractual cash flows not expected to be collected are $190.

The net revenues and net income of Super Label included in the consolidated statement of income from the acquisition date through March 31, 2016 were $23,157 and $175, respectively. The net revenues and net income of Barat included in the consolidated statement of income from the acquisition date through March 31, 2016 were $30,098 and $1,251, respectively.

Pro Forma Information (Unaudited)

The following table provides the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 as if Super Label and Barat had been acquired as of the beginning of fiscal year 2015. However, pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies from the combination of the companies, and accordingly, are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred if the acquisitions had occurred on the dates indicated or that may result in the future.

   2016   2015 

Net revenues

  $887,803   $888,757 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color

  $50,270   $46,295 

Diluted earnings per share

  $2.97   $2.74 

The following is a reconciliation of actual net revenues and net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation to pro forma net revenues and net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation:

   2016   2015 
   Net Revenues   Net Income   Net Revenues   Net Income 

Multi-Color Corporation actual results

  $870,825   $47,739   $810,772   $45,716 

Acquired companies results

   16,978    1,063    77,985    4,373 

Pro forma adjustments

   —      1,468    —      (3,794
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pro forma results

  $887,803   $50,270   $888,757   $46,295 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table identifies pro forma adjustments:

   2016   2015 

Acquired companies financing costs

  $150   $2,063 

Acquisition transaction costs

   2,243    672 

Incremental depreciation and amortization

   —      (1,838

Incremental interest costs

   (925   (4,691
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pro forma adjustments

  $1,468   $(3,794
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Acquisition Activity

On January 3, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of Graphix Labels and Packaging Pty Ltd. (Graphix) for $17,261. The purchase price included $1,631 that is deferred for two years after the closing date. Graphix is located in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and specializes in producing labels for both the food & beverage and wine & spirits markets. In January 2017, the Company acquired an additional 67.6% of the common shares of Gironde Imprimerie Publicité (GIP) for $2,084 plus net debt assumed of $862. The purchase price included $208 that is deferred for one year after the closing date. The Company acquired 30% of GIP as part of the Barat acquisition in fiscal 2016, which included a fair value equity interest in GIP of $771. Immediately prior to obtaining a controlling interest in GIP, the Company recognized a gain of $690 as a result of re-measuring the fair value of the equity interest based on the most recent share activity. GIP is located in the Bordeaux region of France and specializes in producing labels for the wine & spirits market. On July 1, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of Italstereo Resin Labels S.r.l. (Italstereo) for $3,342 less net cash acquired of $181. The purchase price included $201 and $133 that are deferred for one and two years, respectively, after the closing date. Italstereo is located near Lucca, Italy and specializes

in producing pressure sensitive adhesive resin coated labels, seals and emblems. On July 6, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of Industria Litografica Alessandrina S.r.l. (I.L.A.) for $6,301 plus net debt assumed of $3,547. The purchase price includes $819 that is deferred for three years after the closing date. I.L.A. is located in the Piedmont region of Italy and specializes in production of premium self-adhesive and wet glue labels primarily for the wine & spirits market and also services the food industry. The combined net revenues and net income included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2017 for Graphix, GIP, Italstereo, and I.L.A. is $11,177 and $425, respectively. The results of operations of these acquired businesses have been included in the consolidated financial statements (see Note 19).since the respective dates of acquisition and have been determined to be immaterial for purposes of additional disclosure.

(3) ACQUISITIONS

DI-NA-CAL SummaryThe determination of the final purchase price allocation to specific assets acquired and liabilities assumed is incomplete for Graphix, GIP, Italstereo and I.L.A. The purchase price allocations may change in future periods as the fair value estimates of assets and liabilities (including, but not limited to, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, intangibles and debt) and the valuation of the related tax assets and liabilities are completed.

On January 4, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of Cashin Print for $17,487 less net cash acquired of $135 and 100% of System Label for $11,665 less net cash acquired of $2,025. Cashin Print and System Label are located in Castlebar, Ireland and Roscommon, Ireland, respectively. The purchase prices for Cashin Print and System Label included $1,411 and $1,571, respectively, for purchase price adjustments, which were paid to the seller during the three months ended June 30, 2016. In addition, the purchase prices for Cashin Print and System Label include deferred payments of $3,317 and $1,011, respectively. These deferred payments may be paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the long-term liabilities related to these deferred payments were reduced based on management’s current estimate of the future payout and $887 was recorded in other income in the consolidated statements of income. The acquired businesses supply multinational customers in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Continental Europe and provide Multi-Color with the opportunity to supply a broader product range to a larger customer base, especially in the healthcare market. On October 1, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Supa Stik Labels (Supa Stik) for $6,787 less net cash acquired of $977. Supa Stik is located in Perth, West Australia and services the local wine, food & beverage and healthcare label markets. The purchase price included $622 that is deferred for two years after the closing date. On May 1, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Mr. Labels in Brisbane, Queensland Australia for $2,110. The purchase price included $196 that was deferred until the first anniversary of the closing date, which was paid during fiscal 2017. Mr. Labels provides labels primarily to food and beverage customers. The combined net revenues and net income included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2016 for Cashin Print, System Label, Supa Stik and Mr. Labels were $8,679 and $922, respectively. The results of operations of these acquired businesses have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the respective dates of acquisition and have been determined to be immaterial for purposes of additional disclosure.

On February 2, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of New Era Packaging (New Era) for $16,366 less net cash acquired of $1,741. New Era is based near Dublin, Ireland and specializes in labels for the healthcare, pharmaceutical and food industries. On January 5, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of Multi Labels Ltd. (Multi Labels) for $15,670 plus net debt assumed of $3,733. Multi Labels is based in Daventry, near London, England, and specializes in premium alcoholic beverage labels for spirits and imported wine. On July 1, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of Multiprint Labels Limited (Multiprint) based in Dublin, Ireland for $1,662 plus net debt assumed of $2,371. The purchase price included $273 that was deferred for one year after the closing date, which was paid during fiscal 2016. Multiprint specializes in pressure sensitive labels for the wine & spirits and beverage markets in Ireland and the UK. The combined net revenues and net loss included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2015 for New Era, Multi Labels and Multiprint were $12,628 and $(295), respectively. The results of operations of these acquired businesses have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the respective dates of acquisition and have been determined to be individually and collectively immaterial for further disclosure.

Effective February 1, 2014, the Company acquired the assets of the DI-NA-CAL label business, based near Cincinnati, Ohio, from Graphic Packaging International, Inc., which was accounted for as a business combination.$80,667. DI-NA-CAL operates manufacturing facilities near Cincinnati, Ohio and Greensboro, North Carolina and provides decorative label solutions primarily in the heat transfer label markets for home & personal care and food & beverage through long-standing relationships with blue chip national and multi-national customers. The acquisition extends Multi-Color’s position in the heat transfer label market and allows us to support a number of new customers with a broader range of label technologies. The results of DI-NA-CAL’s operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning February 1, 2014.

The purchase price for DI-NA-CAL consisted of cash of $80,667, which was funded through borrowings under the Credit Facility (see Note 8 for details of the Credit Facility). Upon closing, $8,067 of the purchase price was deposited into an escrow account and iswas to be released to the seller on the 18 month anniversary of the closing date in accordance with the provisions of the escrow agreement. The escrow amount is to fund certain potential obligations of the seller with respect to the transaction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, all but $598 of the escrow amount was released to the seller. As of March 31, 2017, $351 remained in the escrow account. The Company spent $305$452 in acquisition expenses related to the DI-NA-CAL acquisition, which wasacquisition. These expenses were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.income, $147 in fiscal 2015 and $305 in fiscal 2014.

John Watson &In conjunction with the acquisition of DI-NA-CAL, the Company Limited (Watson) Summaryrecorded an indemnification asset of $427, which represented the seller’s obligation to indemnify Multi-Color relating to pre-acquisition customer quality claims. As discussed above, an escrow fund exists for indemnification obligations, subject to certain minimum thresholds and deductibles. The seller paid the Company for the indemnification asset during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.

On October 1, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of John Watson & Company Limited (Watson) based in Glasgow, Scotland.Scotland, for $21,634 less net cash acquired of $143. Watson is thea leading glue-applied spirit label producer in the U.K. The business is ideally located for its key customers and is complementary to MCC’s existing business in Glasgow (formerly Labelgraphics), the leading pressure sensitive wine and spirit label producer in the same region. The results of Watson’s operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning October 1, 2013.

The purchase price for Watson consisted of the following:

Cash from proceeds of borrowings

  $ 13,136  

Contingent consideration

   8,498  
  

 

 

 

Purchase price, before cash acquired

   21,634  

Net cash acquired

   (143
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $21,491  
  

 

 

 

The cash portion of the purchase price was funded through borrowings under the Credit Facility (see Note 8 for details of the Credit Facility). The purchase price includesincluded a future performance based earnout of $8,498, estimated as of the acquisition date, which is to be paid out in July 2014.date. The amount of the earnout iswas based on a comparison between EBITDA for the acquired business for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 less certain adjustments and any claims to fund certain potential indemnification obligations of the seller with respect to the transaction. An additional $1,063 related to the earnout due to the sellers was accrued in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 based on better than estimated fiscal 2014 performance by the acquired company compared to estimates made at the time of the acquisition, which was recorded in other expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Company spent $284 in acquisition expenses related toIn June 2014, the Watson acquisition,amount of the earnout was finalized and an additional $343 was accrued, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expensesother expense in the consolidated statements of income. The earnout was paid in July 2014.

Flexo Print S.A. De C.V. (Flexo Print) Summary

On August 1, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of Flexo Print S.A. De C.V. (Flexo Print) based in Guadalajara, Mexico.Mexico for $31,847 plus net debt assumed of $2,324. Flexo Print is a leading producer of home & personal care, food & beverage, wine & spiritspirits and pharmaceutical labels in Latin America. The acquisition provides Multi-Color with significant growth opportunities in Mexico through our many common customers, technologies and suppliers. The results of Flexo Print’s operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning August 1, 2013.

The purchase price for Flexo Print consisted of the following:

Cash from proceeds of borrowings

  $ 29,134  

Deferred payment

   2,713  
  

 

 

 

Purchase price, before debt assumed

   31,847  

Net debt assumed

   2,324  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $34,171  
  

 

 

 

The cash portion of the purchase price was funded through borrowings under the Credit Facility (see Note 8 for details of the Credit Facility). Assumed net debt includes $2,884 of bank debt less $560 of cash acquired. Upon closing, $3,058 of the purchase price was deposited into an escrow account, and an additional $1,956 of the purchase price was retained by MCC and iswas deferred until the third anniversary of the closing date at which time it should beand deposited into the escrow account.account during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. These combined escrow amounts are to be released to the seller on the fifth anniversary of the closing date in accordance with the purchase agreement. An additional $757 of the purchase price was retained by MCC at closing and is to bewas paid to the seller on the 3rdthird anniversary of the closing date in accordance with the purchase agreement. The combined escrow and retention amounts are to fund certain potential indemnification obligations of the seller with respect to the transaction. The Company spent $357 in acquisition expenses related to the Flexo Print acquisition, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, second quarter of fiscal 2015, third quarter of fiscal 2015 and first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company reducedadjusted the deferred payment by $1,157$(1,157), $69, $69 and $217, respectively, in settlement of an indemnification claim.

Labelgraphics (Holdings) Ltd. (Labelgraphics) Summary

On April 2, 2012,In conjunction with the acquisition of Flexo Print, the Company acquired 100%recorded an indemnification asset of Labelgraphics,$3,279, which represents the seller’s obligation under the purchase agreement to indemnify Multi-Color for the outcome of potential contingent liabilities relating to uncertain tax positions. As discussed above, a wine & spirit label specialist located in Glasgow, Scotland. The acquisition expanded MCC’s global presence in the wine & spirit label market, particularly in the United Kingdom. The results of Labelgraphics’ operations were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning April 2, 2012.

The purchase price for Labelgraphics consisted of the following:

Cash from proceeds of borrowings

  $ 16,024  

Deferred payment

   5,149  

Contingent consideration

   3,461  
  

 

 

 

Purchase price, before debt assumed

   24,634  

Net debt assumed

   712  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $25,346  
  

 

 

 

The cash portion of the purchase price was funded through borrowings under the Credit Facility (see Note 8 for details of the Credit Facility). Assumed net debt includes $757 of bank debtheld back by Multi-Color and capital leases less $45 of cash acquired. The purchase price includes a future performance based earnout of $3,461, estimated as of the acquisition date, which is to be paid outadditional funds are being held in July 2014. The amount of the earnout is based on a comparison between EBITDA for the acquired business for fiscal 2012 and the average for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 less certain adjustments and any claims to fund certain potential indemnification obligations of the seller with respect to the transaction. The accrual related to the earnout due to sellers was decreased to $500 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 based upon the actual results of the acquired company for fiscal 2013 and 2014 compared to the estimates made at the time of acquisition. The Company spent $394 in acquisition expenses related to the Labelgraphics acquisition, which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

Purchase Price Allocation and Other Items

The determination of the final purchase price and its allocation to specific assets acquired and liabilities assumed for DI-NA-CAL, Watson and Flexo Print will be finalized prior to the end of January 2015, September 2014 and July 2014, respectively, once independent fair value appraisals of assets and liabilities and valuation of tax liabilities are finalized. The determination of the final purchase price and its allocation to specific assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Labelgraphics was finalized during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 as the independent fair value appraisals of assets and liabilities and valuation of tax liabilities were finalized. There were no material changes to the preliminary purchase price or related allocation for Labelgraphics.

Based on fair value estimates, the final purchase prices for DI-NA-CAL, Watson, Flexo Print and Labelgraphics have been allocated to individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

   DI-NA-CAL   Watson   Flexo Print   Labelgraphics 

Assets Acquired:

        

Net cash acquired

  $—      $143    $—      $—    

Accounts receivable

   7,672     4,606     7,915     3,275  

Inventories

   3,329     1,974     2,072     1,794  

Property, plant and equipment

   7,803     5,404     11,522     8,680  

Intangible assets

   37,700     4,090     5,367     10,319  

Goodwill

   28,869     9,518     16,222     9,786  

Other assets

   52     487     6,732     2,679  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

   85,425     26,222     49,830     36,533  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities Assumed:

        

Accounts payable

   4,273     2,610     7,177     6,954  

Accrued income taxes payable

   —       285     247     693  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   485     728     5,010     375  

Net debt assumed

   —       —       2,324     712  

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       965     3,225     3,165  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

   4,758     4,588     17,983     11,899  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $80,667    $21,634    $31,847    $24,634  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets and their estimated useful lives are as follows:

   DI-NA-CAL   Watson   Flexo Print   Labelgraphics 
   Fair
Value
   Useful
Lives
   Fair
Value
   Useful
Lives
   Fair
Value
   Useful
Lives
   Fair
Value
   Useful
Lives
 

Customer relationships

  $ 34,550     21 years    $ 4,090     20 years    $5,367     17 years    $9,775     20 years  

Trademarks

   —       —       —       —       —       —       320     2 years  

Non-compete agreements

   3,150     7 years     —       —       —       —       224     5 years  
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total identifiable intangible assets

  $37,700      $4,090      $5,367      $10,319    
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives based on a number of assumptions including the estimated period of economic benefit and utilization. The weighted-average amortization period for identifiable intangible assets acquired in the DI-NA-CAL, Watson, Flexo Print and Labelgraphics acquisitions is 20, 20, 17 and 19 years, respectively.

The goodwill for DI-NA-CAL is attributable to access to new blue chip national and multi-national customers and the acquired workforce. The goodwill for Flexo Print is attributable to access to the Mexican label market and the acquired workforce. The goodwill for Watson and Labelgraphics is attributable to access to the UK spirit label market and the acquired workforce. None of the goodwill arising from the Watson, Flexo Print, or Labelgraphics acquisitions is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $28,869 of the goodwill arising from the DI-NA-CAL acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes. Below is a roll forward of the acquisition goodwill from acquisition date to March 31, 2014:

   DI-NA-CAL   Watson   Flexo
Print
  Labelgraphics 

Balance at acquisition date

  $28,869    $9,518    $16,222   $9,786  

Foreign exchange impact

   —       275     (409  391  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2014

  $28,869    $9,793    $15,813   $10,177  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accounts receivable acquired as part of the DI-NA-CAL acquisition had a fair value of $7,672 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustments was $7,719 and the estimated contractual cash flows that are not expected to be collected are $47. The accounts receivable acquired as part of the Watson acquisition had a fair value of $4,606 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustment was $4,623 and the estimated contractual cash flows that are not expected to be collected are $17. The accounts receivable acquired as part of the Flexo Print acquisition had a fair value of $7,915 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustments was $8,258 and the estimated contractual cash flows that are not expected to be collected are $343. The accounts receivable acquired as part of the Labelgraphics acquisition had a fair value of $3,275 at the acquisition date. The gross contractual value of the receivables prior to any adjustments was $3,403 and the estimated contractual cash flows that are not expected to be collected are $128.

The net revenues and net income of DI-NA-CAL included in the consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date through March 31, 2014 were $11,763 and $822, respectively. The net revenues and net income of Watson included in the consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date through March 31, 2014 were $9,259 and $690, respectively. The net revenues and net income of Flexo Print included in the consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date through March 31, 2014 were $15,017 and $269, respectively.

The net revenues and net income for Labelgraphics are included in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended March 31, 2013. The net revenues and net income for the year ended March 31, 2013 attributable to Labelgraphics were $22,493 and $781, respectively. The combined net revenues and net income for the year ended March 31, 2012 for CentroStampa, Monroe Etiquette, La Cromografica, WDH and York were $195,181 and $6,321, respectively.

Other Acquisition Activity

On October 1, 2013, the Company acquired Gern & Cie SA (Gern) in Neuchatel, Switzerland for $5,939. Gern is the premier wine label producer in Switzerland, with similar customer profiles and technologies as our existing French operations. On April 2, 2013, the Company completed acquisitions in Australia and France for $7,362. In Adelaide, Australia, MCC acquired Labelmakers Wine Division. In the Champagne region of France, MCC acquired Imprimerie Champenoise, which increases our ability to support local champagne producers in the region. The results of operations of these acquired businesses have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition and have been determined to be individually and collectively immaterial for further disclosure.

On October 3, 2011, the Company acquired York Label Group (York), including its joint venture in Santiago, Chile, for $329,204 plus net debt assumed of $9,870. York, which was headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, is a leader in the home & personal care, food & beverage and wine & spirit label markets with manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Canada and Chile.

Of the purchase price, $21,309 was to be paid on April 1, 2012 and of this amount, $2,500 was required to be deposited into an escrow account in order to satisfy DLJ South American Partners, L.P. (“DLJ”)‘ssupport the sellers’ indemnification obligations with respect to the transaction. On April 1, 2012, the Company paid DLJ $11,880 and deposited $2,500 into escrow in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. The balance due DLJ of $6,929 was subject to dispute as further described in Note 17 and was placed into a separate escrow account controlled by the Company. During December 2013, an agreement in principle was reached to settle the dispute. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement entered into on January 23, 2014, and as further described in Note 17, the accrual was reduced to $3,129 and a gain of $3,800 was recorded to other income in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, $1,800 in escrow shares were released to the Company and additional payments were paid and received by the parties. The Settlement Agreement reflects a compromise regarding disputed claims and is not to be construed as an admission of liability or fault by any of the parties.obligations.

On July 1, 2011, the Company acquired Warszawski Dom Handlowy (WDH), a consumer products and spirit label company located in Warsaw, Poland, for $7,760 plus net debt assumed of $4,019. The purchase price included a contingent payment to be made to the selling shareholders if certain financial targets were reached. The financial targets were reached in calendar year 2011 and the contingent payment and deferred payment were made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

On May 2, 2011, the Company acquired 70% ownership in two label operations in Latin America; one in Santiago, Chile and the other in Mendoza, Argentina with a regional partner owning the remaining 30%. MCC’s investment including debt assumed was approximately $3,900. These companies focus on providing premium labels to the expanding Latin American wine & spirit markets. In September 2011, the Company bought the regional partner’s 30% ownership interest in the two label operations in Latin America for 40 shares of Multi-Color common stock. As a result, MCC now owns 100% of the label operations in Chile and Argentina.

On April 1, 2011, the Company acquired La Cromografica, an Italian wine label specialist located in Florence, Italy, for $9,880 plus net debt assumed of $1,628.

(4) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ALLOWANCE

(4)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ALLOWANCE

The Company’s customers are primarily major consumer product,producers of home & personal care, wine & spirits, food & beverage, healthcare and wine & spirit companies and container manufacturers.specialty consumer products. Accounts receivable consist of amounts due from customers in connection with our normal business activities and are carried at sales value less allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is established to reflect the expected losses of accounts receivable based on past collection history, age, account payment status compared to invoice payment terms and specific individual risks identified. The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017   2016   2015 

Balance at beginning of year

  $1,652   $1,070   $584    $2,497   $2,101   $2,028 

Provision

   807   827   560     234    1,249    330 

Accounts written-off

   (407 (227 (64   (384   (864   (75

Foreign exchange

   (24 (18 (10   (74   11    (182
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $2,028   $1,652   $1,070  

Balance at end of year

  $2,273   $2,497   $2,101 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(5) INVENTORIES

(5)INVENTORIES

The Company’s inventories as of March 31 consisted of the following:

 

  2014 2013   2017   2016 

Finished goods

  $30,276   $26,839    $35,204   $35,126 

Work-in-process

   7,539   7,918     8,933    7,066 

Raw materials

   21,503   18,533     26,862    25,508 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total inventories, gross

   59,318    53,290     70,999    67,700 

Inventory reserves

   (3,022  (4,556   (7,004   (6,509
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total inventories, net

  $56,296   $48,734    $63,995   $61,191 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

(6) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

(6)PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The Company’s property, plant and equipment as of March 31 consisted of the following:

 

  2014 2013   2017   2016 

Land

  $2,495   $1,981    $4,300   $2,937 

Buildings

   37,300   35,513  

Buildings, building improvements and leasehold improvements

   53,711    44,055 

Machinery and equipment

   257,287   219,662     330,089    309,150 

Furniture, fixtures, computer equipment and software

   20,741   17,784     27,648    25,178 

Construction in progress

   6,959   11,785     22,428    7,483 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, gross

   324,782    286,725     438,176    388,803 

Accumulated depreciation

   (130,193  (108,173   (190,915   (167,508
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  $194,589   $178,552    $247,261   $221,295 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total depreciation expense for 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was $27,995, $26,851$33,480, $31,295 and $20,718,$29,828, respectively.

Changes in market conditions and pricing pressures were impairment indicators for our Chilean business in fiscal 2014. Changes in sales forecasts were impairment indicators for our Mexican operations in fiscal 2014. Due to the nature of a start-up operation, we have experienced losses in our Chinese location.

As a result we testedof our decision to close certain manufacturing facilities during fiscal 2016 and 2015, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at these facilities would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives.

As a result of the decision to close our manufacturing facility located in Sonoma, California, during fiscal 2016 non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $220 were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned.

As a result of the decision to consolidate our manufacturing facilities located in Glasgow, Scotland, during fiscal 2016 non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $115 were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned.

As a result of the decision to close our manufacturing facility located in Greensboro, North Carolina, during fiscal 2016 non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $786 were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned.

As a result of the decision to close our manufacturing facility located in Dublin, Ireland, during fiscal 2016 non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $219 were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment and leasehold improvements that were not transferred to other locations and were abandoned.

As a result of the decision to close our manufacturing facilities located in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin, during fiscal 2015, non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $5,208 were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned. Also included in these charges is an impairment related to the land and building in Norway, Michigan. These carrying amounts were adjusted to their estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which were determined based on a market valuation from an independent third party. The land and building in Watertown, Wisconsin were not impaired. During fiscal 2016, additional impairment charges of $534 were recorded to adjust the carrying value of the land and building held for sale at the Norway facility to their estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which were determined based upon a quoted market price. The land and buildings at the Norway and Watertown facilities were sold during fiscal 2016, and a gain of $476 was recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income related to the sale of the Watertown facility.

These asset impairment charges were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 20 for further information on these facility closures.

During fiscal 2015, the Company also determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at the manufacturing facilities located in Chile and Argentina will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives. Non-cash impairment charges of $621 related to these assets was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income, primarily to write-down certain machinery and equipment to their estimated fair values. In addition, the carrying amounts of certain machinery and equipment that was abandoned were written off. During fiscal 2016, non-cash impairment charges of $73 were recorded to write-off additional assets that were abandoned.

In addition, the Company performed impairment testing on long-lived assets for impairment.at certain manufacturing locations during fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 due to the existence of other impairment indicators. The undiscounted cash flows associated with the long-lived assets in Chile, Mexico and China were greater than their carrying values, and therefore, no additional impairment was present. No impairment indicators existedpresent in 2013 or 2012.any of these three years.

(7) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

(7)GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the Company’s goodwill consisted of the following:

 

Balance at March 31, 2012

  $ 342,189  

Acquisition of Labelgraphics

   9,786  

Adjustment to York acquisition

   (991

Currency translation

   (3,313
  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2013

  $347,671  

Acquisitions

   62,092  

Impairment charge

   (13,475

Currency translation

   (4,598
  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2014

  $391,690  
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016 

Balance at beginning of year

    

Goodwill, gross

  $434,212   $381,308 

Accumulated impairment losses

   (12,203   (13,087
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill, net

   422,009    368,221 

Activity during the year

    

Acquisitions

   12,551    53,833 

Adjustments to prior year acquisitions

   (12,049   206 

Currency translation

   (9,961   (251
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

    

Goodwill, gross

   424,941    434,212 

Accumulated impairment losses

   (12,391   (12,203
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill, net

  $412,550   $422,009 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

For all but twoSee Note 3 for further information regarding acquisitions.

Historically, the Company’s policy was to perform the annual goodwill impairment test as of the last day of February of each fiscal year. Beginning in fiscal 2016, the Company changed its annual goodwill impairment test date to the last day of January of each fiscal year. See Note 2 for further information.

In conjunction with our reporting units,annual impairment test as of January 31, 2017, the Company performed a qualitativequantitative assessment and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair valuesfor all of theour reporting unit is less than the carrying value. Due to lower operating performance as a result of increased competition caused by market conditions and pricing pressures in our Chilean operations, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Latin America Wine & Spirit (LA W&S) reporting unit. Due to changes in sales forecasts during fiscal 2014, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Latin America Consumer Product Goods (LA CPG) reporting unit.

units. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of theeach reporting unit to theits carrying value. We estimated the fair value of theeach reporting unitsunit using a combination of: (i) a market approach based on multiples of revenue and EBITDA from recent comparable transactions and other market data; and (ii) an income approach based on expected future cash flows discounted at 17%rates ranging between 8.5% to 11.0% in 2014.2017. The

discount rate reflects the additional industry-specific risk corresponding toassociated with each respective reporting unit, including the lower perceived revenueindustry and EBITDA multiples for the industry.geographies in which they operate. The market approach and income approaches were both considered, with the income approach were weighted equallyselected based on judgment of the comparability of the recent transactions due to the fluid nature of the business and recent acquisitions. The market approach was used to corroborate values determined by the risks inherent in estimating future cash flows.income approach. We considered recent economic and industry trends, as well as risk in executing our current plans from the perspective of a hypothetical buyer in estimating expected future cash flows in the income approach.

For LA CPG,all of our reporting units, the first step of the impairment test did not indicate potential impairment as the estimated fair value of the reporting unitunits exceeded the carrying amount. As a result, the second step of the impairment test was not required. For the LA W&S reporting unit, the first step of the impairment test indicated potential impairment, which was measured in the second step.

The second step measures the implied value of goodwill by subtracting the fair value of our LA W&S reporting unit’s assets and liabilities, including intangible assets, from the fair value of LA W&S as estimated in step 1. The goodwill impairment charge was measured as the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the estimated carrying value. The impairment charge of $13,475 was recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 and resulted in a reduction in goodwill, leaving a balance of $6,698 in goodwill related to LA W&S as of March 31, 2014. The impairment loss recorded is an estimate, as the step 2 analysis is not complete. The loss is probable and represents management’s best estimate. The fair value appraisals of the fixed assets and lease intangibles were not completed prior to the filing date of this Form 10-K. Once the final step 2 valuations are completed, any resulting adjustments will be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. A change in management and completion of significant workforce reductions during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 did not result in significant improvement in operating results in the fourth quarter, which indicated the existence of potential impairment. If operating performance does not improve in Latin America, the related assets’ carrying values may be impacted and further analysis may be necessary in future quarters.

Significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the LA W&Sour reporting unitunits include estimates of future cash flows, discount raterates and multiples of revenue and EBITDA. These assumptions are typically not considered individually because assumptions used to select one variable should also be considered when selecting other variables; however, sensitivity of the overall fair value assessment to each significant variable is also considered.

In conjunction with our annual impairment test as of January 31, 2016, the Company performed a qualitative assessment for all but two of our reporting units and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units were less than the carrying values. Due to changes in sales forecasts during fiscal 2016, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Latin America Consumer Product Goods (LA CPG) reporting unit. As it passed the first step of the fiscal 2015 impairment test by less than 5%, the Company performed the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test for the Asia Pacific Wine & Spirits (AP W&S) reporting unit. For both LA CPG and AP W&S, the first step of the impairment test did not indicate potential impairment as the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount. As a result, the second step of the impairment test was not required.

As a result of our fiscal 2014 analysis,impairment test, the Company recorded an estimated non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $13,475 related to our Latin America Wine & Spirits (LA W&S) reporting unit in fiscal 2014. During fiscal 2015, the Company finalized the fiscal 2014 impairment test and recorded an additional non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $951 for LA W&S.

Based on operating results for the Europe Wine & Spirits (EUR W&S) reporting unit, a 1% increase inquantitative goodwill impairment assessment was performed during the selected discount rate would have resulted in $600second quarter of additional2017 for this reporting unit. No impairment was indicated. Based on operating results for the LA CPG and LA W&S reporting units during fiscal 2015, a 5% decrease in the selected multiplesquantitative goodwill impairment assessment was performed as of revenue and EBITDA would have resulted in $500 of additional impairment.

September 30, 2014 for those two reporting units. No impairment was indicated. No events or changes in circumstances occurred in 20142016 that required goodwill impairment testing in between annual tests. The 2013 and 2012 tests did not indicate impairment.

In fiscal 2013, the $991 reduction to goodwill arising from the York acquisition includes a $400 increase in the fair value of intangible assets based on a revision to the inputs used in the independent appraisal of customer relationships during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The remaining net $206 change during the first and second quarter of fiscal 2013 consists of adjustments recorded to the valuation of inventory, primarily a $222 true-up of inventory that, based on the best available information at the time, was fully reserved in the opening balance sheet. Upon a detailed review completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, it was determined that a portion of this inventory could be used in operations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, goodwill arising from the York acquisition decreased $385 due to the completion of the reconciliation of the opening balance sheet for the foreign operations in Chile at the beginning of the third quarter. This resulted in numerous reclassifications among trade receivables, inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and adjustments to goodwill for prepaid expenses, receivables and liabilities that existed at the acquisition date. The Company also finalized the valuation of tax liabilities in the third quarter of fiscal 2013. The net $991 increase in the value of net assets acquired resulted in an offsetting decrease to goodwill.

See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding acquisitions.

The Company’s intangible assets as of March 31 2014 consisted of the following:

 

   Balance at cost
at March 31,
2013
   Acquisitions   Foreign
Exchange
  Intangibles
at Cost
   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Intangibles
at March 31,
2014
 

Customer relationships

  $136,321    $46,137    $(1,050 $181,408    $(30,069 $151,339  

Technologies

   1,598     —       (37  1,561     (1,360  201  

Trademarks

   1,012     —       7    1,019     (1,019  —    

Licensing intangible

   2,408     —       66    2,474     (1,842  632  

Non-compete agreements

   214     3,934     (76  4,072     (301  3,771  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $141,553    $50,071    $(1,090 $190,534    $(34,591 $155,943  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company’s intangible assets as of March 31, 2013 consisted of the following:

  2017   2016 
  Balance at cost
at March 31,
2012
   Labelgraphics
Acquisition
   Adjustment
to York
Acquisition
   Foreign
Exchange
 Intangibles
at Cost
   Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Intangibles
at March 31,
2013
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Carrying
Amount
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Carrying
Amount
 

Customer relationships

  $127,322    $9,775    $400    $(1,176 $136,321    $(21,374 $114,947    $228,518   $(61,546 $166,972   $215,317   $(49,258 $166,059 

Technologies

   1,608     —       —       (10 1,598     (1,141 457     1,658    (1,368  290    1,308    (1,308  —   

Trademarks

   705     320     —       (13 1,012     (860 152     1,013    (1,013  —      1,101    (1,082 19 

Licensing intangible

   2,468     —       —       (60 2,408     (1,349 1,059     1,958    (1,958  —      2,091    (2,091  —   

Non-compete agreement

   —       224     —       (10 214     (44 170  

Non-compete agreements

   5,063    (3,116  1,947    5,160    (2,149 3,011 

Lease intangible

   128    (117  11    137    (80 57 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

  $132,103    $10,319    $400    $(1,269 $141,553    $(24,768 $116,785    $238,338   $(69,118 $169,220   $225,114   $(55,968 $169,146 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The intangible assets were established in connection with completed acquisitions. They are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives based on a number of assumptions including customer attrition rates, percentage of revenue attributable to technologies, royalty rates and projected future revenue growth. The weighted-average amortization period for the intangible assets acquired in fiscal 20142017 is 1913 years. The weighted-average amortization period for the intangible assets acquired in fiscal 20132016 is 1916 years. Total amortization expense of intangible assets for 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was $9,823, $9,493$14,425, $13,178 and $6,456,$11,541, respectively.

The estimated useful lives for each intangible asset class are as follows:

 

Customer relationships

   7 to 21 years 

Technologies

   7 to 8 years 

Trademarks

   1 to 2 years 

Licensing intangible

   5 years 

Non-compete agreements

   52 to 7 years

Lease intangible

3 years 

The annual estimated amortization expense for future years is as follows:

 

Fiscal 2015

  $11,656  

Fiscal 2016

   11,077  

Fiscal 2017

   10,951  

Fiscal 2018

   10,904    $14,258 

Fiscal 2019

   10,765     14,067 

Fiscal 2020

   14,067 

Fiscal 2021

   13,699 

Fiscal 2022

   12,324 

Thereafter

   100,590     100,805 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $155,943    $169,220 
  

 

   

 

 

Our intangibleThe Company performed impairment testing on long-lived assets, inincluding intangibles, at certain manufacturing locations during fiscal 2017 and 2016 due to the LA W&S reporting unit consistexistence of customer relationships with definite lives.impairment indicators. The weighted average remaining lives of our LA W&S customer relationships is 17 years. Our intangible assets in our Mexican operations consist of customer relationships with definite lives. The weighted average remaining lives of our Mexican customer relationships is 16 years. The failure of step 1 of the goodwill impairment analysis for LA W&S and changes in sales forecasts for our Mexican operations were impairment indicators in fiscal 2014. As a result, we tested the related intangible assets for impairment. Theestimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the other amortizable intangiblelong-lived assets were greater than thetheir carrying value for both LA W&S and Mexico,values, and therefore, no impairment was present. No impairment indicators existedpresent in 2013 or 2012.either of these two years related to intangible assets.

(8) DEBT

(8)DEBT

The components of the Company’s debt as of March 31 consisted of the following as of March 31:following:

 

  2014 2013  2017 2016 

U.S. Revolving Credit Facility, 3.93% and 3.95% weighted variable interest rate at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively, due in 2016

  $84,200   $88,125  

Term Loan Facility, 3.73% and 3.78% variable interest rate at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively, due in quarterly installments from 2015 to 2016

   361,875   309,375  

Australian Sub-Facility, 6.20% variable interest rate at March 31, 2014, due in 2016

   28,536    —    
 Principal Unamortized
Debt Issuance
Costs
 Long-Term Debt
Less Unamortized
Debt Issuance
Costs
 Principal Unamortized
Debt Issuance
Costs
 Long-Term Debt
Less Unamortized
Debt Issuance
Costs
 

6.125% Senior Notes (1)

 $ 250,000  $(3,822 $246,178  $250,000  $(4,497 $245,503 

U.S. Revolving Credit Facility (2)

  198,100   (2,335  195,765  230,000  (3,258 226,742 

Australian Revolving Sub-Facility (2)

  31,965   (178  31,787  27,948  (245 27,703 

Capital leases

   2,205   2,747    7,412   —     7,412  5,745   —    5,745 

Other subsidiary debt

   1,386   2,609    359   —     359  586   —    586 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total debt

   478,202    402,856    487,836   (6,335  481,501  514,279  (8,000 506,279 

Less current portion of debt

   (42,648  (23,946  (2,093  —     (2,093 (1,573  —    (1,573
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total long-term debt

  $435,554   $378,910   $485,743  $(6,335 $479,408  $512,706  $(8,000 $504,706 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(1)The 6.125% Senior Notes are due on December 1, 2022.

(2)Borrowings under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and Australian Revolving Sub-Facility mature on November 21, 2019.

The following is a schedule of future annual principal payments as of March 31, 2014:2017:

 

  Debt   Capital Leases   Total   Debt   Capital Leases   Total 

Fiscal 2015

  $40,920    $1,728    $42,648  

Fiscal 2016

   45,893     477     46,370  

Fiscal 2017

   388,881     —       388,881  

Fiscal 2018

   260     —       260    $129   $1,964   $2,093 

Fiscal 2019

   43     —       43     114    1,837    1,951 

Fiscal 2020

   230,101    1,768    231,869 

Fiscal 2021

   37    1,375    1,412 

Fiscal 2022

   33    468    501 

Thereafter

   —       —       —       250,010    —      250,010 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $475,997    $2,205    $478,202    $480,424   $7,412   $487,836 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

On February 29, 2008,November 21, 2014, the Company executedissued $250,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”). The Notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company. Interest is payable on June 1st and December 1st of each year beginning June

1, 2015 until the maturity date of December 1, 2022. The Company’s obligations under the Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s existing direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement (defined below). In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company incurred debt issuance costs of $5,413 during 2015, which are being deferred and amortized over the eight year term of the Notes.

Concurrent with the issuance and sale of the Notes, the Company amended and restated its credit agreement. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) provides for revolving loans of up to $500,000 for a five year $200,000term expiring on November 21, 2019. The aggregate commitment amount is comprised of the following: (i) a $460,000 revolving credit agreement withfacility (the “U.S. Revolving Credit Facility”) and (ii) an Australian dollar equivalent of a consortium$40,000 revolving credit facility (the “Australian Revolving Sub-Facility”).

Upon issuance of bank lenders (Credit Facility) with an original expiration date in 2013. In August 2011,the Notes, the Company executedwas required to repay in full the third amendment toTerm Loan Facility under the terms of its prior credit agreement. On November 21, 2014, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $341,625 on the Term Loan Facility using the net proceeds from the Notes and borrowings on the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility. The third amendment increasedrepayment of the aggregate principal amountTerm Loan Facility was treated primarily as an extinguishment of debt. As a result, $2,001 in unamortized deferred financing fees were recorded to $500,000 with an additional $315,000 term loan,interest expense during 2015 as a loss on the extinguishment of debt. The remaining unamortized fees of $2,275 and new debt issuance costs of $2,526, which the Company drew down onwere incurred during 2015 in conjunction with the York Label Group acquisition in October 2011. In February 2014,Credit Agreement, were deferred and are being amortized over the Company executed the seventh amendment tofive year term of the Credit Facility to access $100,000 to fund the acquisition of the DI-NA-CAL label business (see Note 3). As a result of the first through seventh amendments, which were executed in fiscal 2011 through fiscal 2014, the following current provisions are in place for the Credit Facility.Agreement.

The Credit Agreement may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes and to fund permitted acquisitions (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates plus a margin, based on the Company’s consolidated senior secured leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility was 2.72% and 2.33% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and on borrowings under the Australian Revolving Sub-Facility was 3.43% and 3.89% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties as well as customary negative and affirmative covenants which require the Company to maintain the following financial covenants at March 31, 2014:the end of each quarter: (i) a minimummaximum consolidated net worth;senior secured leverage ratio of no more than 3.50 to 1.00; (ii) a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 4.25no more than 4.50 to 1.001.00; and (iii) a minimum consolidated interest charge coverage ratio of not less than 4.00 to 1.00. The maximum consolidated leverage ratio has scheduled step downs to 3.50 to 1.00 in future periods. The Credit FacilityAgreement contains customary mandatory and optional prepayment provisions and customary events of default,default. The U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and isthe Australian Revolving Sub-Facility are secured by the capital stock of subsidiaries, intercompany debt andsubstantially all of the Company’sassets of each of our domestic subsidiaries, but excluding existing and non-material real property, and intercompany debt. The Australian Revolving Sub-Facility is also secured by substantially all of the assets but excluding real property. of the Australian borrower and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”) limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit Agreement and the Indenture, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company isto dispose of assets, incur guarantee obligations, make restricted payments, create liens, make equity or debt investments, engage in mergers, change the business conducted by the Company and its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Under the Credit Agreement and the Indenture, certain changes in control of the Company could result in the occurrence of an Event of Default. In addition, the Credit Agreement limits the ability of the Company to modify terms of the Indenture. As of March 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with allthe covenants underin the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2014. The expiration date is August 2016.

The Credit Facility may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. Loans under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility bear interest either at: (i) base rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus the applicable margin for such loans which ranges from 1.00% to 2.50%; or (ii) the applicable London interbank offered rate, plus the applicable margin for such loans which ranges from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. Loans under the Australian Sub-Facility bear interest at the BBSY Rate plus the applicable margin for such loans, which ranges from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing.

At March 31, 2014, the aggregate commitment amount of $556,875 under the Credit Facility is comprised of the following: (i) a $155,000 revolving Credit Facility that allows the Company to borrow in alternative currencies up to the equivalent of $50,000 (U.S. Revolving Credit Facility); (ii) the Australian dollar equivalent of a $40,000 revolving Credit Facility (Australian Sub-Facility); and (iii) a $361,875 term loan facility (Term Loan Facility) which amortizes quarterly based on an escalating percentage of the initial aggregate value of the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility amortizes quarterly based on the following schedule: (i) March 31, 2014 through December 31, 2015—amortization of $10,125 and (ii) March 31, 2016 through June 30, 2016—amortization of $15,188, with the balance due at maturity.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company incurred $1,364 in debt issuance costs related to the debt modification that occurred as a result of the seventh amendment to the Credit Facility. We analyzed the new loan costsAgreement and the existing unamortized loan costs related to the prior agreement allocated to the amended revolving line of credit and term loan separately to determine the amount of costs to be capitalized and the amount to be expensed. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded $99 to selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2014 to expense certain third-party fees related to the modification of the term loan. The remaining new and unamortized deferred loan costs are being deferred and amortized over the term of the modified agreement.

The Company incurred $8,562 of debt issuance costs in fiscal 2012 related to the debt modification, which are being deferred and amortized over the life of the amended Credit Facility. In conjunction with the modification to our debt in the third amendment to the Credit Facility, we analyzed the new loan costs related to the amended Credit Facility and the existing unamortized loan costs related to the prior agreement allocated to the revolving line of credit, prior term loan and amended term loan separately to determine the amount of costs to be capitalized and the amount to be expensed. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a charge to interest expense of $490 in fiscal 2012 to write-off certain deferred financing fees, which were paid to originate the prior agreement, including the unamortized portion of the loan costs allocated to creditors no longer participating in the amended Credit Facility. The unamortized portion of loan costs allocated to creditors participating in both the original and amended Credit Facility are being amortized over the term of the modified agreement.Indenture.

The Company recorded $2,057, $1,979$1,665, $1,692 and $1,474$2,200 in interest expense for the years ending March 31, 2014, 2013in 2017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income to amortize deferred financing costs.

Available borrowings under the Credit FacilityAgreement at March 31, 20142017 consisted of $70,263$256,387 under the U.S. Revolving Credit Facility and $11,464$8,035 under the Australian Revolving Sub-Facility. The Company also has various other uncommitted lines of credit available at March 31, 20142017 in the amount of $8,731.

$9,676.

The carrying value of debt approximates fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is based on observable inputs, including quoted market prices (Level 2). The fair value of the Notes was $260,625 as of March 31, 2017.

Capital Leases

The present value of the net minimum payments on the capitalized leases as of March 31 is as follows:

 

  2014 2013   2017   2016 

Total minimum lease payments

  $2,261   $2,858    $8,327   $6,289 

Less amount representing interest

   (56 (111   (915   (544
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Present value of net minimum lease payments

   2,205    2,747     7,412    5,745 

Current portion

   (1,728  (1,693   (1,964   (1,227
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Capitalized lease obligations, less current portion

  $477   $1,054    $5,448   $4,518 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Included in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 20142017 under property, plant and equipment are cost and accumulated depreciation related to capitalized leases of $8,677$10,702 and $4,096,$1,959, respectively. Included in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 20132016 under property, plant and equipment are cost and accumulated depreciation related to capitalized leases of $10,465$7,686 and $3,320,$393, respectively. The capitalized leases carry interest rates from 2.70%2.32% to 6.84%10.11% and mature from fiscal 20152018 to fiscal 2016.2022.

(9) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(9)FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company usesused interest rate swap agreements (Swaps) to minimize its exposure to interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt borrowings. Swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable rate interest payments and do not represent an actual exchange of the underlying notional amounts between the two parties.

In April 2008, theThe Company entered into two Swaps, a $40,000 non-amortizing Swap and a $40,000 amortizing Swap, to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates. Interest payments were based on fixed rates of 3.45% for the non-amortizing Swap and 3.04% for the amortizing Swap, plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility ranging from 2.00% to 3.50% based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Swaps expired in February 2013.

In October 2011, in connection with the drawdown of the $315,000 term loan for the acquisition of York Label Group, the Company entered intohad three forward starting non-amortizing Swaps forwith a total notional amount of $125,000 to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Swaps became effective October 2012 and expireexpired in August 2016. The Swaps resultresulted in interest payments based on an average fixed rate of 1.396% plus the applicable margin per the requirements in the Credit Facility, which was 3.50% as of March 31, 2014.Agreement.

TheUpon inception, the Swaps arewere designated as a cash flow hedges,hedge, with the effective portion of gains and losses, net of tax, measured on an ongoing basis, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.income (loss). If athe hedge or a portion thereof were determined to be ineffective, any gains and losses would be recorded in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

In conjunction with entering into the Credit Agreement on November 21, 2014 (see Note 8), the Company de-designated the Swaps as a cash flow hedge. The amountcumulative loss on the Swaps recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) at the time of gain (loss)de-designation was reclassified into interest expense in the same periods during which the originally hedged transactions affected earnings, as these transactions were still probable of occurring. Subsequent to November 21, 2014, changes in the fair value of the de-designated Swaps were immediately recognized in interest expense.

The gains (losses) on the interest rate swaps recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) waswere as follows:

 

   2014   2013 

Gain (loss) recognized in OCI on interest rate swaps (effective portion)

  $1,432    $(1,179

There was no hedge ineffectiveness related to the Swaps during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. During the next 12 months, the amount of the gains (losses) included in the March 31, 2014 accumulated OCI balance that is expected to be reclassified into the consolidated statements of income is not material. The fair value of the Swaps was included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 20 for additional information on the fair value of the Swaps.

   2017   2016 

Interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments:

    

Loss reclassified from AOCI into earnings

  $(329  $(788

Gain recognized in earnings

   225    1,064 

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

Foreign currency exchange risk arises from our international operations in Australia, Europe, South America, Mexico, Canada, China, Southeast Asia and South Africa as well as from transactions with customers or suppliers denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries is generally the currency of the country in which the subsidiary operates. At times, the Company uses foreign currency forward currency contracts to minimize the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

At March 31, 2014, theThe Company has enteredperiodically enters into multiple foreign currency forward contracts to fix the purchase price in U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated firm commitments to purchase presses and other equipment. Thecommitments. In addition, the Company periodically enters into short-term foreign currency forward contracts areto fix the U.S. dollar value of certain intercompany loan payments, which settle in the following quarter. During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company’s forward contracts were not designated as fair value hedges andhedging instruments; therefore, changes in the fair value of the contracts are recordedwere immediately recognized in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income.

One contract to fix the purchase price of a Euro denominated firm commitment for the purchase of a press and other equipment that settled during 2016 was designated as a hedging instrument; therefore, changes in the fair value of the contract were recorded in other income and expense in the same period during which the related hedged items affectitem affected the consolidated statements of income.

The amount of gain (loss) on the foreign currency forward contracts recognized in the consolidated statements of income was as follows:

 

   2014  2013 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts

  $52   $(47

Gain (loss) on related hedged items

  $(67 $59  

At March 31, 2014, the Company has entered into a foreign currency forward contract to fix the U.S. dollar value of certain intercompany loan payments. This contract was not designated as a hedging instrument; therefore, changes in the fair value of the contract are immediately recognized in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of income and were not material to the consolidated results of operations during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
   2017   2016 

Foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedging instruments:

    

Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts

  $—     $470 

Gain (loss) on related hedged items

   —      (470

Foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments:

    

Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts

  $220   $31 

Gain (loss) on related hedged items

   (188   (32

The fair value of the contracts designated as hedging instruments was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the contract not designated as a hedging instrument was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. See Note 20 for additional information on the fair value of the contracts.

(10) ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

(10)ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

The Company’s accrued expenses and other liabilities as of March 31 consisted of the following as of March 31:following:

 

  2014   2013   2017   2016 

Deferred payment (1)

  $—      $6,929  

Accrued payroll and benefits

   17,531     15,076    $24,286   $20,176 

Unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties)

   —       225  

Accrued income taxes

   2,366     1,152     5,604    3,016 

Professional fees

   391     482     500    2,730 

Accrued taxes other than income taxes

   1,210     1,205     1,616    1,372 

Deferred lease incentive

   453     518     209    266 

Accrued interest

   115     197     5,178    5,310 

Accrued severance

   1,123     580     47    90 

Customer rebates

   1,818     1,061     2,672    2,541 

Deferred press payments

   650     4,418     —      898 

Plant consolidation costs (2)

   744     —    

Contingent consideration

   10,307     —    

Exit and disposal costs related to facility closures

   123    370 

Deferred payments

   1,068    5,072 

Deferred revenue

   7,076    6,771 

Other

   7,670     4,889     5,379    4,282 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total accrued expenses and other liabilities

  $44,378    $36,732    $53,758   $52,894 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)(11)The balance at March 31, 2013 consisted of deferred payment of $6,929 related to the acquisition of York Label Group that was originally due to be paid on April 1, 2012. At that time, the amount due was in dispute and $6,929 was placed in an escrow account controlled by the Company. During December 2013, an agreement in principle was reached to settle the dispute. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement entered into on January 23, 2014, and as further described in Note 17, the accrual was reduced to $3,129 and a gain of $3,800 was recorded to other income in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, $3,129 was paid in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

(2)The balance at March 31, 2014 consisted of a liability related to severance and plant consolidation costs for the Company’s facility in El Dorado Hills, California, as further described in Note 21.

(11) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company maintains a 401K retirement savings plan (Plan) for U.S. employees who meet certain service requirements. The Plan provides for voluntary contributions by eligible U.S. employees up to a specified maximum percentage of gross pay. At the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company may contribute a specified matching percentage of the employee contributions. The Company also makes contributions to various retirement savings plans for Australian employees as required by law equal to 9% of gross pay and to other voluntary and involuntary defined contribution plans in China, Canada, England, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Scotland, South Africa and Switzerland. Company contributions to these retirement savings plans were $3,758, $3,290$5,189, $4,982 and $2,949$4,437 in 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

The Company hassponsors several pension plans, including our principal pension plan for certain former U.S. employees as well as other subsidiary pension plans around the globe. Our principal pension plan which is discussed below, is a single employer defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) which covers eligible union employees at its former Norway, Michigan plant who were hired prior to July 14, 1998. The Pension Plan provides benefits based on a flat payment formula and years of credited service at a normal retirement age of 65. The benefits are actuarially reduced for early retirement. An active participant may annually elect to irrevocably freeze their benefits to participate in the Company 401K retirement savings plan.

The Company also has a post retirement healthrecorded $145, $89 and welfare plan (Health Plan) that upon retirement provides health benefits to certain active Norway plant employees hired on or before July 31, 1998. The Health Plan allows participants to retire as early as age 62$158 of net periodic benefit cost in 2017, 2016 and remain in the active medical plan until reaching Medicare eligibility at age 65. The Health Plan has no assets and the Company pays benefits as incurred.2015, respectively.

The Company used a March 31 measurement date (the fiscal year end) for the Pension Plan in 2017 and Health Plan in 2014, 2013 and 2012.2016. The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans:

   Pension Plan  Health Plan 
   2014  2013  2012  2014  2013  2012 

Net periodic benefit cost components

       

Service cost

  $30   $26   $29   $26   $25   $26  

Interest cost

   85    83    85    20    22    31  

Expected (return) or loss on plan assets

   (93  (81  (93  —      —      —    

Amortization of net actuarial (gain) or loss

   67    62    23    (8  (6  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $89   $90   $44   $38   $41   $57  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Reconciliation of the plans’ benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status and weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost and projected benefit obligation as of March 31, 20142017 and 20132016 are as follows:

   Pension Plan  Health Plan 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 

Change in benefit obligation

     

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $2,001   $1,783   $621   $583  

Service cost

   30    26    26    25  

Interest cost

   85    83    20    22  

Actuarial loss/(gain)

   (232  109    (22  (9

Amendments

   —      —      —      —    

Benefits paid

   (130  —      —      —    

Plan expenses paid

   —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $1,754   $2,001   $645   $621  

Change in plan assets

     

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $1,292   $1,120   $—     $—    

Actual return on plan assets

   147    103    —      —    

Employer contributions

   74    69    —      —    

Benefits paid

   (130  —      —      —    

Plan expenses paid

   —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $1,383   $1,292   $—     $—    

Reconciliation of funded status

     

Funded status

  $(371 $(709 $(645 $(621

Unrecognized net actuarial (gain)

   —      —      —      (127
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrued cost at end of year

  $(371 $(709 $(645 $(748
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Pension Plan  Health Plan 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 

Weighted average assumptions

     

Discount rate—net periodic cost

   4.25  4.65  3.15  3.85

Discount rate—projected benefit obligation

   4.50  4.25  3.50  3.15

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   7.00  7.00  —      —    

The accumulated the Company’s benefit obligation for the Pension Plan was $1,754$1,136 and $2,001$1,653 as of March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

Rate of compensation increases are not applicable as a result of flat benefit formulas. The discount rate and rate of return were selected based upon current market conditions, Company experience and future expectations. The amount expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income and expected to be included in net periodic pension cost during the next twelve months is less than $40. The liability for the unfunded status of the Pension Plan and Health Plan was classified as long-term in other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Pension Plan assets consist primarily of listed equity and debt securities. Below are the weighted average asset allocations by category at March 31, 2014 and 2013 and the target allocations for 2015:

         Target % 

Asset category

  2014  2013  2015 

Equity securities

   64  59  60-70

Debt securities

   15  15  10-20

Real estate

   0  0  0

Other

   21  26  20-30
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

��

 

Total

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

At March 31, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets were as follows:

                                                                                                                                                            
             Total             Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Guaranteed

        

Stable Fund

  $288    $—      $288    $—    

Balanced

   516     —       516     —    

U.S. Common Stock

        

Equity Growth

   91     —       91     —    

Value & Income

   201     —       201     —    

Growth & Income

   155     —       155     —    

Special Equity

   90     —       90     —    

International

   42     —       42     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,383    $—      $1,383    $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets were as follows:

                                                                                                                                                            
             Total             Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Guaranteed

        

Stable Fund

  $337    $—      $337    $—    

Balanced

   472     —       472     —    

U.S. Common Stock

        

Equity Growth

   76     76     —       —    

Value & Income

   166     —       166     —    

Growth & Income 

   132     132     —       —    

Special Equity

   72     —       72     —    

International

   37     —       37     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,292    $208    $1,084    $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The fair value of plan assets was $580 and $959 as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, the guaranteedCompany’s unfunded obligation was $556 and $694, respectively.

Non-U.S. Plans

Certain subsidiaries outside the United States sponsor defined benefit postretirement plans that cover eligible regular employees. The Company deposits funds and/or purchases investments to fund balanced fund, domestic common stocks and international fund represents the reported net asset value of shares or underlying assets of the investment. The stable fund’s book value approximates fair value. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the Health Plan. The health care cost trend rate assumed in measuring the Health Plan benefit obligation is 9% gradually decreasing to 4% in 2019 and thereafter. A one percentage point change in these assumed rates would increase the post retirement obligation by $57 or decrease the post retirement obligation by $51.

The Health Plan has no assets and the Company pays the benefits as incurred. Benefits expected to be paid from these plans in addition to providing reserves for these plans. Benefits under the futuredefined benefit plans are as follows:typically based on years of service and the employee’s compensation. The range of assumptions that are used for the non-U.S. defined benefit plans reflect the different economic environments within the various countries. These defined benefit plans are recorded based upon local accounting standards and are immaterial to the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

   Pension Plan   Health Plan 

Fiscal 2015

  $—      $21  

Fiscal 2016

   —       34  

Fiscal 2017

   1     49  

Fiscal 2018

   11     52  

Fiscal 2019

   36     82  

Fiscal 2020-Fiscal 2024

   399     389  

(12) INCOME TAXES

(12)INCOME TAXES

Earnings before income taxes were as follows:

   2017   2016   2015 

U.S.

  $65,113   $55,764   $57,958 

Foreign

   23,100    11,046    12,914 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $88,213   $66,810   $70,872 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2014  2013   2012 

U.S.

  $49,913   $39,203    $19,549  

Foreign

   (5,656  9,484     11,575  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $44,257   $48,687    $31,124  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The provision (benefit) for income taxes as of March 31 includes the following components:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017   2016   2015 

Current:

          

Federal

  $4,763   $5,077   $2,580    $16,889   $11,492   $10,923 

State and local

   1,322   1,326   (207   2,498    1,103    1,421 

Foreign

   3,883   3,969   3,695     9,298    4,268    6,289 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Current

   9,968    10,372    6,068     28,685    16,863    18,633 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred:

          

Federal

   7,829    8,222    5,533     987    5,360    6,880 

State and local

   553    740    427     (147   437    1,025 

Foreign

   (2,317  (947  (572   (2,677   (3,679   (1,382
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Deferred

   6,065    8,015    5,388     (1,837   2,118    6,523 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $16,033   $18,387   $11,456    $26,848   $18,981   $25,156 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following is a reconciliation between the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 

U.S. federal statutory rate

   35.0 35.0 35.0   35.0 35.0 35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

   2.9 3.1 1.8   1.7 2.1 2.9

Section 199 deduction

   (1.6)%  (0.9)%  (0.3)%    (1.8)%  (1.5)%  (1.2)% 

International rate differential

   3.9 0.3 0.1   (3.3)%  (2.6)%  (1.2)% 

Unrecognized tax benefits

   (5.9)%  (0.7)%  (2.3)%    (0.9)%  (1.6)%  0.4

Foreign permanent differences

   (1.0)%  (3.6)%  (5.6)%    (2.1)%  (2.0)%  (2.1)% 

Outside basis difference

   (4.0)%   —      —    

Non-deductible transaction costs

   0.3 (0.1)%  2.0   0.2 1.5 0.3

Valuation allowances

   0.6 3.9 3.3   1.2 (2.2)%  0.8

Goodwill impairment

   6.1  —      —       —     —    0.3

Other

   (0.1)%  0.8 2.8   0.4 (0.3)%  0.3
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective tax rate

   36.2  37.8  36.8   30.4 28.4 35.5
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The net deferred tax components as of March 31 consisted of the following at March 31:following:

 

  2014 2013   2017   2016 

Deferred tax liabilities:

       

Book basis over tax basis of fixed assets

  $(27,687 $(23,218  $(28,911  $(26,075

Book basis over tax basis of intangible assets

   (36,079 (31,937   (45,044   (45,671

Lease obligations

   (508 (2,941   —      (948

Deferred financing costs

   (254 (297   (434   (628

Other

   (391 (313   (185   (228
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (64,919  (58,706   (74,574   (73,550
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred tax assets:

       

Inventory reserves

   1,639    1,405     1,632    1,822 

Inventory capitalization

   454    467     595    282 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   601    377     332    391 

Stock based compensation expense

   1,414    1,457     1,535    1,339 

Minimum pension liability

   417    530     642    637 

Loss carry forward amounts

   17,125    23,776     5,215    5,947 

Credit carry forward amounts

   134    150     378    331 

Interest rate swaps

   787    1,335     —      126 

State basis over tax basis of fixed assets

   610    420     565    552 

Non-deductible accruals and other

   3,871    3,182     5,037    4,033 

Deferred compensation

   361    —       206    104 

Lease obligations

   384    —   
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross deferred tax asset

   27,413    33,099     16,521    15,564 

Valuation allowance

   (6,978  (7,255   (4,860   (4,494
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

   20,435    25,844     11,661    11,070 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $(44,484 $(32,862  $(62,913  $(62,480
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of March 31, 2014,2017, Multi-Color had tax-effected federal, state and foreign operating loss carryforwards of $8,559, $2,327,$727 and $6,239$4,488, respectively. As of March 31, 2013,2016, Multi-Color had tax-effected federal, state and foreign operating loss carryforwards of $13,933, $3,105$875 and $6,738,$5,072, respectively. TheThere were no federal operating loss carryforwards will expire in fiscal 2031.as of March 31, 2017 and 2016. The state operating loss carryforwards will expire between fiscal 20152026 and fiscal 2031. The foreign operating loss carryforwards include $1,316$1,577 with no expiration date; the remainder will expire between fiscal 20162019 and fiscal 2033. The federal and state operating loss carryforwards include losses of $8,559 and $2,327, respectively$727 that were acquired in connection with business combinations. Utilization of the acquired federal and state tax loss carryforwards may be limited pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

As of March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, Multi-Color had valuation allowances of $6,978$4,860 and $7,255,$4,494, respectively. As of March 31, 20142017 and 2013, $6,6982016, $4,752 and $7,013,$4,366, respectively, of the valuation allowances related to certain deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions due to the uncertainty of the realization of future tax benefits from those assets. The Company recorded a $315 decrease in valuation allowances in fiscal 2014 related to

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, in foreign jurisdictions for whichmanagement considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the Company believes an incomedeferred tax benefitassets will not be realized.

During The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the fourth quartergeneration of fiscal year 2014,future taxable income during the IRS released Rev. Proc. 2014-16periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and 2014-17 which provided transitional guidance related toprojected future taxable income in making this assessment. At each reporting date, the final tangible property regulations issued on September 13, 2013. These regulations will be effective for Multi-Color’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2015. Multi-Color continues to review these regulations but does not believe there will be a material impact onCompany considers both negative and positive evidence that impacts the consolidated financial statements when they are fully adopted.assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets.

The benefits of tax positions are not recorded unless it is more likely than not the tax position would be sustained upon challenge by the appropriate tax authorities. Tax benefits that are more likely than not to be sustained are measured at the largest amount of benefit that is cumulatively greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized.

As of March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company had liabilities of $4,161$5,665 and $3,411,$6,253, respectively, recorded for unrecognized tax benefits for U.S. federal, state and foreign tax jurisdictions. During the years ended March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company recognized ($549)$175 and ($99)$(118), respectively, of interest and penalties in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. The liability for the gross amount of interest and penalties at March 31, 20142017 and 20132016 was $1,306$1,892 and $1,568,$1,806, respectively. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified in other noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets for the portion of the liability where payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date. During the year ended March 31, 2014,2017, the Company released reserves in the amount$1,381 of $3,295,reserves, including interest and penalties, related to uncertain tax positions thatfor which the statutes of limitations have been settled.lapsed or there was a reduction in the tax position related to a prior year. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that $35$1,759 of unrecognized tax

benefits as of March 31, 20142017 could be released within the next 12 months due to the lapse of statute of limitations and settlements of certain foreign and domestic income tax matters. The unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective tax rate are $4,161.$5,075.

A summary of the activity for the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31 is as follows:

 

  2014 2013   2017   2016 

Beginning balance

  $3,411   $3,616    $6,253   $4,045 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

   3,079   63     196    318 

Additions of tax positions of prior years

   15   30     684    3,515 

Settlements

   (2,224  —    

Reductions of tax positions of prior years

   (8 (97   (7   (166

Lapse of statutes of limitations

   (112 (201

Lapse of applicable statutes of limitations

   (1,091   (1,280

Currency translation

   (370   (179
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Ending balance

  $4,161   $3,411    $5,665   $6,253 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various foreign jurisdictions and various state and local jurisdictions where the statutes of limitations generally range from three to five years. At March 31, 2014,2017, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 2010.2014. The Company is no longer subject to state and local examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 2009.2012. In foreign jurisdictions, the Company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 1999.

The Company did not provide for U.S. federal income taxes or foreign withholding taxes in fiscal 20142017 on approximately $24,442$54,882 of undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. Quantification of the deferred tax liability, if any, associated with these undistributed earnings is not practicable. The Company may periodically repatriate a portion of these earnings to the extent we can do so essentially tax-free or at minimal tax cost.

(13) MAJOR CUSTOMERS

(13)MAJOR CUSTOMERS

During 2014, 2013,2017, 2016 and 2012,2015, sales to major customers (those exceeding 10% of the Company’s net revenues in one or more of the periods presented) approximated 17%, 15%17% and 14%18%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated net revenues. All of these sales were made to theThe Procter & Gamble Company.

In addition, accounts receivable balances from theThe Procter & Gamble Company approximated 7%4% and 5%2% of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance at March 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The loss or substantial reduction of the business of any of this major customer could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

(14) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

(14)EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the basic EPS and diluted EPS computations:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 
      Per Share     Per Share     Per Share       Per Share     Per Share     Per Share 
  Shares   Amount Shares   Amount Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount Shares   Amount Shares   Amount 

Basic EPS

   16,342    $1.73   16,145    $1.88   14,662    $1.34     16,879   $3.61  16,750   $2.85  16,623   $2.75 

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted shares

   257     (0.03 187     (0.02 241     (0.02

Effect of dilutive securities

   145    (0.03 202    (0.03 254    (0.04
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Diluted EPS

   16,599    $1.70    16,332    $1.86    14,903    $1.32     17,024   $3.58  16,952   $2.82  16,877   $2.71 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The Company excluded 142, 432172, 120 and 222102 shares in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively, from the computation of diluted EPS because these shares would have an anti-dilutive effect.

(15) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

(15)STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company maintains incentive plans which authorize the issuance of stock-based compensation including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stockshare units to officers, key employees and non-employee directors. New shares are issued upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock or restricted share units. As of March 31, 2014, 1,3922017, 1,075 shares of common stock remained reserved for future issuance under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and 2006 Director Equity Compensation Plan.

The Company measures compensation costs related to share-based transactions at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and recognizes them as expense over the requisite service period.

For the year ended March 31, 2014,2017, the Company recorded pre-tax compensation expense for stock-based incentive awards of $1,497$3,042 which increased selling, general and administrative expenses by $855$2,064 and cost of revenues by $642$978 and had an associated tax benefit of $494. The impact on basic and diluted net income per share for the year ended March 31, 2014 was $0.06.$943.

For the year ended March 31, 2013,2016, the Company recorded pre-tax compensation expense for stock-based incentive awards of $1,255$2,982 which increased selling, general and administrative expenses by $761$2,211 and cost of revenues by $494$771 and had an associated tax benefit of $477. The impact on basic and diluted net income per share for the year ended March 31, 2013 was $0.05.$835.

For the year ended March 31, 2012,2015, the Company recorded pre-tax compensation expense for stock-based incentive awards of $1,062$1,970 which increased selling, general and administrative expenses by $707$1,246 and cost of revenues by $355$724 and had an associated tax benefit of $393. The impact on basic and diluted net income per share for the year ended March 31, 2012 was $0.05.$690.

Stock Options

Stock options granted under the plans enable the holder to purchase common stock at an exercise price not less than the market value on the date of grant and will expire not more than ten years after the date of grant. The applicable options vest ratably over a three to five year period. The Company calculates the value of each employee stock option, estimated on the grant date, using the Black-Scholes model and the following weighted average assumptions:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 

Expected life (years)

   6   5   5     5.8  5.8  6.2 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.4 0.7 1.8   1.2 1.9 2.0

Expected volatility

   53.7 58.0 56.7   38.9 40.1 51.9

Dividend yield

   0.8 1.1 0.9   0.3 0.3 0.6

The Company estimated volatility based on the historical volatility of its common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term consistent with the expected life of the options in effect at the time of the grant. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The expected life of the options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is based on review of historical exercise behavior of option grants with similar vesting periods. The Company uses an estimated forfeiture rate based on historical data. The forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

A summary of the changes in the options outstanding for years ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 is shown below:

 

  Options Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
   Weighted Average
Remaining Life
(Years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
       Weighted   Weighted Average   Aggregate 

Outstanding at March 31, 2011

   895   $15.37      
      Average Exercise   Remaining Life   Intrinsic 
  Options   Price   (Years)   Value 

Outstanding at March 31, 2014

   895   $19.65     

Granted

   170   $22.02         121   $37.29     

Exercised

   (97 $12.84      $1,102     (324  $17.01     $10,021 

Forfeited

   (10 $13.43         (36  $19.26     
  

 

        

 

       

Outstanding at March 31, 2012

   958   $16.83      

Outstanding at March 31, 2015

   656   $24.24     

Granted

   159   $18.67         157   $61.85     

Exercised

   (104 $12.21      $1,182     (190  $21.41     $8,037 

Forfeited

   (49 $18.50         (23  $35.97     
  

 

        

 

       

Outstanding at March 31, 2013

   964   $17.55      

Outstanding at March 31, 2016

   600   $34.50     

Granted

   169   $29.55         32   $61.62     

Exercised

   (220 $17.83      $3,225     (136  $24.52     $5,664 

Forfeited

   (18 $22.70         (25  $41.66     
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2014

   895   $19.65     5.6    $13,740  

Outstanding at March 31, 2017

   471   $38.84    6.4   $15,132 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable at March 31, 2014

   449   $17.09     3.3    $8,046  

Exercisable at March 31, 2013

   542   $17.32     4.0    $4,590  

Exercisable at March 31, 2017

   191   $26.72    4.9   $8,475 

Exercisable at March 31, 2016

   194   $20.03    4.7   $6,449 

As of March 31, 2014,2017, the total compensation cost related to nonvested options not yet recognized and the weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is $3,360$3,722 and 3.43.0 years, respectively.

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was $14.32, $8.47,$22.72, $24.35 and $10.23,$18.10, respectively. Cash received from options exercised during the year ended March 31, 20142017 was $3,177,$2,742, with a tax benefit of $505.

$1,146. The total grant-date fair value of options vested during the year ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was $933, $842$2,062, $1,528 and $611,$1,265, respectively.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock grants under the plans typically vest over a three to five year period. The cost of these awards is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period the restrictions lapse. A summary of the changes in restricted shares for the year ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 is shown below:

  Restricted
Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
   Restricted   Grant Date 

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2011

   34   $16.49  
  Shares   Fair Value 

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2014

   35   $27.05 

Granted

   12   $21.29     11   $42.46 

Vested

   (16 $17.39     (19  $25.89 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2012

   30   $17.92  

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2015

   27   $34.07 

Granted

   23   $22.33     15   $68.15 

Vested

   (16 $17.10     (17  $31.34 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2013

   37   $21.10  

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2016

   25   $55.99 

Granted

   15   $33.16     8   $64.50 

Vested

   (17 $19.94     (15  $51.67 

Forfeited

   (1  $64.05 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2014

   35   $27.05  

Non-vested restricted shares at March 31, 2017

   17   $62.72 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of March 31, 2014,2017, the total compensation cost related to non-vested restricted shares not yet recognized and the weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized was $722$739 and 2.01.8 years. The total grant-date fair value of restricted shares vested during the year ended March 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was $340, $275$720, $520 and $275,$495, respectively. The Company realized a tax benefit of $112 from restricted shares vested during the year ended March 31, 2017.

(16) GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATIONRestricted Share Units

Restricted share units (RSUs) granted under the plans vest over a three year period, and the number of RSUs that will vest is based on the Company’s level of achievement of a certain performance target. Based on the extent to which the performance condition is met, it is possible for none of the RSUs to vest or for a range up to the maximum to vest. The cost of these awards is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period based on the Company’s estimate of the probable outcome of the performance condition. We evaluate our estimate quarterly, and the expense is adjusted for any change in our estimate of the probable outcome. A summary of the changes in restricted share units for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 are shown below:

       Weighted Average 
       Grant Date 
   RSUs   Fair Value 

Non-vested RSUs at March 31, 2015

   —     $—   

Granted

   42   $64.05 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-vested RSUs at March 31, 2016

   42   $64.05 

Granted

   35   $61.19 

Forfeited

   (18  $62.59 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-vested RSUs at March 31, 2017

   59   $62.80 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2017, the total compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs not yet recognized was $1,104 based upon the Company’s estimate of the probable outcome of the performance condition. The weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized was 1.7 years.

(16)GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

During fiscal 2014, the Company2017, we acquired the DI-NA-CAL label business, Watson, Gern, Flexo Print, Labelmakers Wine DivisionItalstereo, I.L.A., Graphix and Imprimerie Champenoise.GIP. During fiscal 2013, the Company2016, we acquired Labelgraphics.Cashin Print, System Label, Supa Stik, Super Label, Barat and Mr. Labels and began producing labels from our start-up operation in La Rioja, Spain. During fiscal 2012, the Company2015, we acquired La Cromografica, WDH, YorkNew Era, Multi Labels and two label operations in Latin America.Multiprint. All of these acquisitions expanded the Company’s geographic presence. ForSee Note 3 for further information regarding these acquisitions, see Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.acquisitions. The Company now manufactures labels in the United States, Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, England, France, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Scotland, South Africa, Spain,

Switzerland and Switzerland.Thailand. Net revenues, based on the geographic area from which the product is shipped, for the years ended March 31 and long-lived assets by geographic area as of March 31 are as follows:

 

  2014   2013   2012   2017   2016   2015 

Net revenues:

            

United States

  $444,996    $434,307    $317,091    $511,551   $504,598   $512,383 

Australia

   66,619     64,927     66,615     72,450    59,237    63,245 

Italy

   59,027     59,415     65,959  

Other International

   135,790     101,166     60,582     339,294    306,990    235,144 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $706,432    $659,815    $510,247    $923,295   $870,825   $810,772 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  2017   2016     

Long-lived assets:

      

United States

  $370,492   $372,208   

Australia

   105,670    89,300   

Other International

   359,234    356,715   
  

 

   

 

   

Total

  $835,396   $818,223   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   2014   2013 

Long-lived assets:

    

United States

  $394,997    $319,300  

Australia

   100,467     111,711  

Italy

   60,882     58,815  

Other International

   193,555     158,513  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $749,901    $648,339  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(17) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(17)COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease Agreements

The Company has various equipment, office and facility operating leases. Leases expire on various dates through June 2026 and some of the leases contain clauses requiring escalating rent payments. Rent expense during 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 was approximately $11,447, $10,791$12,767, $12,920 and $9,177,$12,995, respectively.

The annual future minimum rental obligations as of March 31, 20142017 are as follows:

 

Fiscal 2015

  $ 12,970  

Fiscal 2016

   10,633  

Fiscal 2017

   9,003  

Fiscal 2018

   7,299  

Fiscal 2019

   6,238  

Thereafter

   24,461  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $70,604  
  

 

 

 

The lease on the Company’s former headquarters in Sharonville, Ohio expires in April 2017. The Company has entered into various contracts to sublease the vacated space. The annual future sublease cash receipts as of March 31, 2014 are as follows:

Fiscal 2015

  $443  

Fiscal 2016

   456  

Fiscal 2017

   478  

Fiscal 2018

   32    $ 12,257 

Fiscal 2019

   —       9,878 

Fiscal 2020

   8,595 

Fiscal 2021

   7,433 

Fiscal 2022

   6,416 

Thereafter

   —       12,795 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $1,409    $57,374 
  

 

   

 

 

Purchase Obligations

The Company has entered into long-term purchase agreements (one to three years) for various raw materials, uniforms, supplies, utilities, other services and other services. The totalproperty, plant and equipment. Total estimated purchase obligations are $7,731 for 2015.$17,756 at March 31, 2017.

Litigation

The Company reported previously that it was a party in a case styledDLJ South American Partners, L.P. (“DLJ”) v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al., Case No. C.A. No. 7417-CS in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “DLJ Litigation”). In a complaint filed on April 13, 2012, DLJ alleged that the Company failed to make certain payments required by the Merger and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) entered into by the Company with Adhesion Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, DLJ, and Diamond Castle Partners IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, (“Diamond Castle”), pursuant to which the Company acquired York Label Group. An affiliate of Diamond Castle nominated Ari J. Benacerraf and Simon T. Roberts for election to the Board of Directors of the Company at its 2012 and 2013 Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Mr. Benacerraf and Mr. Roberts are current members of the Company’s Board.

DLJ sought the payment of $6,939 and interest, legal fees and other equitable relief. On May 18, 2012, the Company filed an answer, counterclaim and third party complaint asserting various causes of action against DLJ, Diamond Castle and affiliated entities arising out of their breaches of the Merger Agreement and other actions.

On January 23, 2014 the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release resolving all claims made in the litigation (the “Settlement Agreement”). The parties agreed to pay certain consideration under the Settlement Agreement, including the release of certain shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company from the escrow established pursuant to the Merger Agreement. On January 23, 2014 the parties filed a Stipulated Final Entry of Dismissal, with Prejudice, with the Delaware Court of Chancery. The settlement and release reflect a compromise regarding disputed claims and are not to be construed as an admission of liability or fault by any of the parties.

The Company is also subject to various legal claims and contingencies that arise out of the normal course of business, including claims related to commercial transactions, product liability, health and safety, taxes, environmental employee-relatedmatters, employee matters and other matters. Litigation is subject to numerous uncertainties and the outcome of individual claims and contingencies is not predictable. It is possible that some legal matters for which reserves have or have not been established could result in an unfavorable outcome for the Company and any such unfavorable outcome could be of a material nature or have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

(18) SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

(18)SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

Supplemental disclosures with respect to cash flow information and non-cash investing and financing activities are as follows:

 

  2014 2013 2012   2017   2016   2015 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:

          

Interest paid

  $19,292   $19,752   $12,658    $23,672   $24,244   $16,033 

Income taxes paid, net of refunds

   13,314   12,865   5,029     21,143    18,680    16,206 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Activities:

          

Additional minimum pension liability

  $368   $(14 $(380  $(282  $57   $(275

Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid

   3,323    2,446    3,664 

Capital lease obligations incurred

   864    3,740    —   

Change in interest rate swap fair value

   1,432   (1,179 132     225    1,064    565 

Common stock issued to buy-out noncontrolling interest

   —      —     (842

Business combinations accounted for as a purchase:

          

Assets acquired (excluding cash)

  $176,690   $36,061   $415,996    $45,328   $153,504   $48,354 

Liabilities assumed

   (31,507 (11,472 (68,197   (16,669   (39,457   (16,854

Common stock issued

   —      —     (46,684

Liabilities for contingent / deferred payments

   (11,684 (8,610 (24,228   242    (7,326   (260

Non-controlling interest

   —      —     (939

Noncontrolling interests

   (62   (3,476   —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net cash paid

  $133,499   $15,979   $275,948    $28,839   $103,245   $31,240 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(19) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(19)ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components ofchanges in the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) asloss by component consisted of March 31 consist of:the following:

 

   2014  2013 

Net unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments

  $(1,680 $5,073  

Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax

   (1,244  (2,121

Minimum pension liability, net of tax

   (242  (468
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  $(3,166 $2,484  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Foreign   Gains and losses         
   currency   on cash flow   Defined benefit     
   items   hedges   pension items   Total 

Balance at March 31, 2015

  $(57,880  $(681  $(411  $(58,972

OCI before reclassifications (1)

   (2,671   —      (29   (2,700

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

   —      485    64    549 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current period OCI

   (2,671   485    35    (2,151
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2016

   (60,551   (196   (376   (61,123

OCI before reclassifications (2)

   (25,042   —      83    (24,959

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

   —      196    91    287 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current period OCI

   (25,042   196    174    (24,672
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2017

  $(85,593  $—     $(202  $(85,795
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

No material amounts were reclassified

(1)Net of tax of $18 for defined benefit pension items.

(2)Net of tax of $(51) for defined benefit pension items.

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss consisted of the following:

   2017   2016 

Gains and losses on cash flow hedges:

    

Interest rate swaps (1)

  $329   $788 

Tax

   (133   (303
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net of tax

   196    485 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension items:

    

Amortization of net actuarial (gains) losses (2)

   15    16 

Settlement and curtailments (2)

   133    88 

Tax

   (57   (40
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net of tax

   91    64 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total reclassifications, net of tax

  $287   $549 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Reclassified from AOCI into interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 9.

(2)Reclassified from AOCI into facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. These components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 11.

(20)FACILITY CLOSURES

Sonoma, California

On January 19, 2016, the Company announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in Sonoma, California, into our existing facility in Napa, California. The transition was substantially completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

Below is a summary of the exit and disposal costs related to the closure of the Sonoma facility:

   Total costs
expected to be
incurred
   Total costs incurred   Cumulative costs
incurred as of
March 31, 2017
 
     2017   

Severance and other termination benefits

  $6   $6   $6 

Other associated costs

   91    91    91 

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances related to the exit and disposal costs:

   Balance at
March 31, 2016
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2017
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $—      6    (6  $—   

Other associated costs

  $—      91    (67  $24 

Other associated costs primarily consist of costs to dismantle, transport and reassemble manufacturing equipment that was moved from Sonoma to Napa.

As a result of the decision to close our Sonoma facility, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at the Sonoma facility would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives. During fiscal 2016, non-cash impairment charges of $220 related to these assets were recorded, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned. During fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a net income during 2014.

(20) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTSgain on the sale of property, plant and equipment of $185 related to assets in Sonoma that were not transferred to Napa and were sold. In addition, the Company wrote-off $140 in property, plant and equipment that was not transferred to Napa and was abandoned. These items were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

The Company defines fair valuecumulative costs incurred in conjunction with the closure as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the Company uses a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the use of observable inputs. The three levels are:

Level 1—Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 3—Unobservable inputs

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has three non-amortizing interest rate Swaps with a total notional amount of $125,000 at March 31, 2014 to convert variable interest rates on a portion of outstanding debt to fixed interest rates to minimize interest rate risk. The Company adjusts the carrying value of these derivatives to their estimated fair values and records the adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income. See Note 9 for additional information on the Swaps.

The Company has historically entered into multiple foreign currency forward contracts to fix the purchase price in U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated firm commitments to purchase presses and other equipment. The forward contracts2017 are designated as fair value hedges and changes in the fair value of the contracts are$272, which were recorded in other income and expensefacility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $52 and $220 in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Glasgow, Scotland

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company began the process to consolidate our two manufacturing facilities located in Glasgow, Scotland into one facility. The transition was substantially completed in the same period during whichfourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

Below is a summary of the exit and disposal costs related hedged items affectto the closure of the Glasgow facility:

   Total costs
expected to be
incurred
   Total costs incurred   Cumulative costs
incurred as of
March 31, 2017
 
     2017   2016   

Severance and other termination benefits

  $479   $100   $379   $479 

Other associated costs

   642 -700    539    103    642 

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances related to the exit and disposal costs:

   Balance at
March 31, 2016
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2017
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $106    100    (206  $—   

Other associated costs

  $—      539    (440  $99 
   Balance at
March 31, 2015
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2016
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $—      379    (273  $106 

Other associated costs

  $—      103    (103  $—   

Other associated costs primarily consist of costs to dismantle, transport and reassemble manufacturing equipment that was moved in order to consolidate our two manufacturing facilities located in Glasgow into one facility.

As a result of the decision to consolidate our Glasgow facilities, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at the closing Glasgow facility would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives. During fiscal 2016, non-cash impairment charges of $115 related to these assets were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. No foreign currency forward contractsincome, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned. During fiscal 2017, the Company recorded a net gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment of $377 related to assets that were outstandingnot transferred to other locations and were sold.

The cumulative costs incurred in conjunction with the closure as of March 31, 2014.2017 are $859, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $262 and $597 in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Greensboro, North Carolina

On October 5, 2015, the Company announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in Greensboro, North Carolina into other North American facilities. The transition was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

Below is a summary of the exit and disposal costs related to the closure of the Greensboro facility:

   Total costs
expected to be
incurred
   Total costs incurred   Cumulative costs
incurred as of
March 31, 2017
 
     2017   2016   

Severance and other termination benefits

  $651   $(22  $673   $651 

Contract termination costs

   —      (66   66    —   

Other associated costs

   844    207    637    844 

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances related to the exit and disposal costs:

   Balance at
March 31, 2016
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2017
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $202    (22   (180  $—   

Contract termination costs

  $66    (66   —     $—   

Other associated costs

  $114    207    (321  $—   

   Balance at
March 31, 2015
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2016
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $—      673    (471  $202 

Contract termination costs

  $—      66    —     $66 

Other associated costs

  $—      637    (523  $114 

Other associated costs primarily consist of costs to dismantle, transport and reassemble manufacturing equipment that was moved from the Greensboro facility to other North American facilities and costs to return the facility to its original leased condition.

As a result of the decision to close our Greensboro facility, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at the Greensboro facility would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives. During fiscal 2016, non-cash impairment charges of $786 related to these assets were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment that was not transferred to other locations and was abandoned. In addition, $85 related to the write off of fixed assets that were not transferred to other facilities and were disposed of in conjunction with the final facility clean-up was recorded in facility closure expenses in fiscal 2016.

The Company has entered into a foreign currency forward contract to fixcumulative costs incurred in conjunction with the U.S. dollar valueclosure as of certain intercompany loan payments. This contract was not designated as a hedging instrument; therefore, changesMarch 31, 2017 are $2,366, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the fair valueconsolidated statements of income, $119 and $2,247 in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Dublin, Ireland

During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company began the process to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in Dublin, Ireland into our existing facility in Drogheda, Ireland. The consolidation was substantially completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

Below is a summary of the contractexit and disposal costs related to the closure of the Dublin facility:

   Total costs
expected to be
incurred
   Total costs incurred   Cumulative costs
incurred as of
March 31, 2017
 
     2017   2016   

Severance and other termination benefits

  $765   $102   $663   $765 

Contract termination costs

   177    177    —      177 

Other associated costs

   670    76    594    670 

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability balances related to the exit and disposal costs:

   Balance at
March 31, 2016
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2017
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $—      102    (102  $—   

Contract termination costs

  $—      177    (177  $—   

Other associated costs

  $83    76    (159  $—   
   Balance at
March 31, 2015
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2016
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $—      663    (663  $—   

Other associated costs

  $—      594    (511  $83 

Other associated costs primarily consist of costs to dismantle, transport and reassemble manufacturing equipment that was moved from Dublin to Drogheda and costs to relocate employees.

As a result of the decision to close our Dublin facility, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain fixed assets at the Dublin facility would be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their estimated useful lives. During fiscal 2016, non-cash fixed asset impairment charges of $219 were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, primarily to write off certain machinery and equipment and leasehold improvements that were not transferred to other locations and were abandoned.

The cumulative costs incurred in conjunction with the closure as of March 31, 2017 are immediately recognized$1,831, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $355 and $1,476 in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin

On September 16, 2014, the Company decided to close our manufacturing facilities located in Norway, Michigan and Watertown, Wisconsin, subject to satisfactory completion of the customer qualification process. Due to available capacity, we transitioned the Norway and Watertown business to other incomeNorth American facilities. On November 4, 2014, the Company communicated to employees its plans to close the Norway and expenseWatertown facilities. Production at the facilities ceased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.

The land and building at the Watertown facility were sold during fiscal 2016, and a gain of $476 was recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 9 for additional information onIn addition, the foreign currency forward contracts.land and building at the Norway facility were sold during fiscal 2016.

Financial liabilities for interest rate swaps are carried in other long term liabilities. Financial liabilities for foreign currency forward contracts are carried in accrued expenses

Below is a summary of the exit and other liabilities.

At March 31, 2014,disposal costs related to the Company carriedclosure of the following financial liabilities at fair value:Norway and Watertown facilities:

 

   Fair Value at  Fair Value Measurement Using 
   March 31, 2014  Level 1   Level 2  Level 3 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

      

Interest rate swap liabilities

  $(2,033 $—      $(2,033 $—    
   Total costs expected
to be incurred
   Total costs incurred   Cumulative costs
incurred as of
March 31, 2017
 
     2016   2015   

Severance and other termination benefits

  $2,023   $134   $1,889   $2,023 

Contract termination costs

   64    —      64    64 

Other associated costs

   943    352    591    943 

At March 31, 2013,Below is a reconciliation of the Company carriedbeginning and ending liability balances related to the following financial liabilities at fair value:exit and disposal costs:

 

   Fair Value at  Fair Value Measurement Using 
   March 31, 2013  Level 1   Level 2  Level 3 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

      

Interest rate swaps

  $(3,465  —      $(3,465  —    

Foreign currency forward contracts

   (73  —       (73  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $(3,538 $—      $(3,538 $—    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Balance at
March 31, 2016
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2017
 

Other associated costs

  $5    —      (5  $—   
   Balance at
March 31, 2015
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
   Balance at
March 31, 2016
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $747    134    (881  $—   

Other associated costs

  $19    352    (366  $5 

The Company values interest rate Swaps using pricing models based on well recognized financial principlesOther associated costs primarily consist of costs to dismantle, transport and available market data. The Company values foreign currency forward contracts by using spot rates atreassemble manufacturing equipment that was moved from the date of valuation.

Other Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements of nonfinancial assetsNorway and nonfinancial liabilities are primarily used in goodwill,Watertown facilities to other intangible assetsNorth American facilities and long-lived assets impairment analyses,costs to maintain the valuation of acquired intangibles and in the valuation of assetsfacilities while held for sale. The

During fiscal 2015, the Company tests goodwill forrecorded non-cash impairment annually, ascharges of $5,208 related to property, plant and equipment at the Norway and Watertown facilities, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. During fiscal 2016, additional impairment charges of $534 were recorded to adjust the carrying value of the last dayland and building held for sale at the Norway facility to their estimated fair value, less costs to sell. See Note 6. Proceeds from the sale of Februaryproperty, plant and equipment that was not transferred to other locations of each$72 were recorded as a credit to facility closure expenses in fiscal year. Impairment is also tested when events or changes2015. In addition, $93 for the write-off of raw materials not transferred to other facilities was recorded in circumstances indicate thatfacility closure expenses in fiscal 2015.

Due to the assets’ carrying values may be greater thanclosure of the fair values.Norway facility, in January 2015 the Company withdrew from a multiemployer pension plan covering certain current and former employees of this plant. During the fourth quarter of fiscalthree months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a $13,475 goodwill impairment chargeloss contingency of $214 for our estimated withdrawal liability, which was recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the trustees of the multiemployer pension plan accepted our proposed lump sum payment of $224 to settle the withdrawal liability. The additional liability of $10 was accrued to facility closure expenses, and the full settlement amount was paid.

During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded settlement expense of $133, $88 and $83, respectively, related to the defined benefit pension plan that covers eligible union employees of our Latin America Wine & Spirit reporting unit. See Note 7 for further information onNorway plant who were hired prior to July 14, 1998. In addition, during fiscal 2015, the goodwill impairment.Company recorded a curtailment loss of $18 related to this defined benefit pension plan. During fiscal 2014 and 2013,2015, the Company did not adjust intangible assetsrecorded a curtailment gain of $827 related to their fair valuesthe postretirement health and welfare plan that provides health benefits upon retirement to certain Norway plant employees hired on or before July 31, 1998. The settlement expenses and curtailment gain and loss were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

The cumulative costs incurred in conjunction with the closure as a result of any impairment analyses. GoodwillMarch 31, 2017 are $8,036, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income, $133, $632 and intangible assets are valued using Level 3 inputs.$7,271 in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As part of the recent acquisitions, the Company acquired presses that were appraised and adjusted to their fair value as part of the purchase price accounting. See Note 3 for further information regarding the acquisitions. The carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt approximate fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is based on observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar instruments (Level 2).

(21) FACILITY CLOSURESEl Dorado Hills, California

On October 16, 2013, the Company announced plans to consolidate our manufacturing facility located in El Dorado Hills, California, into the Napa, California facility. The transition was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In connection with the closure of the El Dorado Hills facility, the Company recorded initial charges of $128 and $1,166 in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, of $1,382respectively, for employee termination benefits, including severance and relocation and other costs. These were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the nature of the employee termination benefits was determined to be such that adjustments were made to reduce the pre-tax impact to the initial charge by $216. The total amount of charges related to closure for El Dorado Hills for fiscal 2014 was $1,166, which were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income. The total costs incurred in connection with the closure is expected to be approximately $1,319. Below iswere $1,294, which were recorded in facility closure expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

Other Facility Closure Costs

During fiscal 2016, the Company closed a roll forwardsmall sales office located near Toronto, Canada and recorded costs of the severance and other termination benefits and relocation and other costs$28 related to the El Dorado Hills facility:closure.

 

   Balance at
March 31, 2013
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
  Balance at
March 31, 2014
 

Severance and other termination benefits and relocation and other costs

  $—       1,166     (422 $744  

In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company consolidated the two operations located in Montreal, Canada into one manufacturing facility. The Company incurred charges of $676 in fiscal 2013 ($178 and $498 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012, respectively) related to fixed asset write-offs and relocation costs in conjunction with the plant consolidation.

In January 2012, the Company announced plans to consolidate its manufacturing facility located in Kansas City, Missouri into our other existing facilities. In connection with the consolidation of the Kansas City facility, the Company incurred charges of $855 in fiscal 2013 ($573 and $282 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively) primarily for employee severance and other termination benefits, non-cash charges related to asset impairments and relocation and other costs. The transition from the Kansas City facility has been completed, and all related employee severance and other termination benefits have been paid. In September 2012, the Kansas City facility was sold for net proceeds of $625. Below is a roll forward of severance and other termination benefits related to the Kansas City facility:

   Balance at
March 31, 2012
   Amounts
Expensed
   Amounts
Paid
  Balance at
March 31, 2013
 

Severance and other termination benefits

  $990     —       (990 $—    

(22) QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

(21)QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

Earnings per share amounts are computed independently each quarter. As a result, the sum of each quarter’s per share amount may not equal the total per share amount for the respective year.

  Quarter   Quarter 

Fiscal 2014

  First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Fiscal 2017

  First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Net revenues

  $166,843    $176,635    $169,435    $193,519    $236,494   $232,140   $210,658   $244,003 

Gross profit

   30,432     33,497     29,116     39,012     52,093    49,953    41,217    53,546 

Net income

   6,672     9,618     8,881     3,053     15,910    16,534    12,195    16,726 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

   15,805    16,343    12,126    16,722 

Basic earnings per share

  $0.41    $0.59    $0.54    $0.19    $0.94   $0.97   $0.72   $0.99 

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.40    $0.58    $0.53    $0.18     0.93    0.96    0.71    0.98 

Fiscal 20142017 results include $13,475 impairment of goodwill related to our Latin America Wine & Spirit reporting unit, which was recorded in the fourth quarter. Fiscal 2014 results also include $1,166$921 ($737706 after-tax) in costs related to the consolidationclosure of our manufacturing

facilities located in El Dorado Hills, California into the Napa, California facilityfollowing: Glasgow, Scotland; Sonoma, California; Greensboro, North Carolina; Dublin, Ireland; Norway, Michigan and $1,116 ($781 after-tax) of integrationWatertown, Wisconsin. These expenses related to the Labelmakers Wine Division acquisition, which were recorded by quarter as follows:

 

   Quarter 
   First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Plant consolidation costs

  $—      $—      $1,382    $(216

Integration expenses

   999     117     —       —    

  Quarter   Quarter 

Fiscal 2013

  First   Second   Third   Fourth 
  First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Facility closure expenses

  $157   $57   $393   $314 
  Quarter 

Fiscal 2016

  First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Net revenues

  $165,010    $169,870    $156,950    $167,985    $217,920   $219,784   $206,028   $227,093 

Gross profit

   30,923     30,436     30,421     34,571     46,835    47,131    39,610    48,050 

Net income

   7,896     7,370     5,882     9,152     13,254    16,654    9,637    8,284 

Net income attributable to Multi-Color Corporation

   13,254    16,570    9,628    8,287 

Basic earnings per share

  $0.49    $0.46    $0.36    $0.57    $0.80   $0.99   $0.57   $0.49 

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.49    $0.45    $0.36    $0.56     0.79    0.98    0.57    0.49 

Fiscal 20132016 results include $1,531$5,200 ($1,1943,708 after-tax) in costs related to the consolidationclosure of our manufacturing facilities located in Montreal, Canadathe following: Glasgow, Scotland; Sonoma, California; Greensboro, North Carolina; Dublin, Ireland; Norway, Michigan and Kansas City, Missouri into other existing facilitiesWatertown, Wisconsin; and $1,337 ($1,040 after-tax) of integrationa sales office near Toronto, Canada. These expenses related to the York acquisition, which were recorded by quarter as follows:

 

   Quarter 
   First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Plant consolidation costs

  $573    $460    $498    $—    

York integration expenses

   272     488     577     —    
   Quarter 
   First   Second   Third   Fourth 

Facility closure expenses

  $253   $472   $1,790   $2,685 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(In thousands, except for statistical data)

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) refers to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), Multi-Color’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014. In conducting2017. Based on this evaluation, Multi-Color concluded there are material weaknesses in the design and operating effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as described below. As a result of such evaluation and this conclusion, Multi-Color also has concluded that itsthe disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information was accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the companies it acquired during fiscal 2014 and included in the 2014 consolidated financial statements. These acquired companies constituted $177,918 or 18% of the Company’s total assets as of March 31, 2014, and $48,439 or 6.9% of total net revenues, for the year end March 31, 2014.2017.

Multi-Color’s management does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because ofdue to simple errorerrors or mistake.mistakes. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions aboutregarding the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

(b)Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Multi-Color’s management is responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the financial statements and other information included in this report. Multi-Color’s management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Multi-Color’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, Multi-Color conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014,2017, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) (the “Framework”) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as described below. As a result of these material weaknesses, management concluded that, as of March 31, 2014,2017, its internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the Framework. The Company’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the companies it acquired during fiscal 2017 which were included in the 2017 consolidated financial statements. These acquired companies constituted $44,536 or 4.1% of the Company’s total assets as of March 31, 2017, and $11,177 or 1.2% of total net revenues, for the year end March 31, 2017.

There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of any system of internal controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective internal controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The following control deficiencies were identified and were determined to be material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014:

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of corporate accounting and finance personnel to design and execute an effective system of internal controls in accordance with an appropriate framework.

Our general information technology controls (“GITCs”) intended to ensure that access to applications and data, and the ability to place program changes into production for such applications and data, was not adequately restricted to the appropriate personnel resulting from inadequate segregation of duties.

Our internal controls over the accounting for restructuring activities, loss contingencies, business combinations, inventory, cost of sales, the sale and leaseback of equipment, and accounting for the valuation of long-lived assets, including property, plant equipment, amortizing intangible assets and goodwill, were not designed appropriately and operating effectively. Furthermore, we did not maintain sufficient documentary evidence of the controls’ operating effectiveness to demonstrate that the controls, as designed, would detect a material misstatement in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The material weaknesses resulted in an initial conclusion related to the carrying value of goodwill which was materially inaccurate and which was corrected by the Company prior to the issuance of the annual consolidated financial statements and inaccurate conclusions related to the accounting for business combinations, restructuring activities, inventory and cost of sales and allowed for a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected in the consolidated financial statements on a timely basis.

Item 8 includes the adverse audit report of KPMGGrant Thornton LLP on Multi-Color’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2014.2017.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Multi-Color’s internal control over financial reporting, except as otherwise described in this Item 9A.

(d) Remediation of the Material Weakness

Multi-Color has implemented and continues to implement changes to its internal control over financial reporting to remediate the control deficiencies that gave rise to material weaknesses. We are undertaking the following remediation plans and actions:reporting.

 

Performing a comprehensive review, supplemented by external service providers as necessary, of the Company’s information systems department to ensure the appropriate complement of personnel and that specific personnel roles and responsibilities are evaluated to ensure that segregation of duties within the Company’s general information technology environments are sufficiently maintained.

Perform a comprehensive review, supplemented by external service providers as necessary, of the Company’s system of internal controls to ensure the following: 1) the Company’s internal controls are complete and suitably designed to address the relevant control objectives for all significant financial statement assertions, 2) the Company’s internal controls are designed at an appropriate level of precision such that they would detect a material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements, 3) appropriate evidence is maintained to support the operating effectiveness of internal controls, and 4) the Company evaluates the need for additional corporate accounting and finance personnel with the requisite skill and technical expertise to design and execute an effective system of internal controls in accordance with an appropriate framework.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable.

PART III

The information required by the following Items will be included in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance

ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

ITEM 11.Executive Compensation

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

ITEM 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1) Financial Statements:

(a)(1)Financial Statements:

The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Multi-Color Corporation and subsidiaries Management’s Report and the Reports of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in Part II, Item 8.

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and 2016

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is included in Part II, Item 9A.

 

(a)(2)

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatement Schedules:

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted because they are either not required or the information is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

(b) Exhibits

(b)Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number
  Exhibit Description
2.1Merger and Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2011, by and between Adhesion Holdings, Inc., Multi-Color Corporation, M Acquisition, LLC, DLJ South American Partners, L.P. and the Stockholders’ Representative (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2011)
3.1  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (together with amendments incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ending March 31, 1996 and 2000 and Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007)
3.2  Amended and Restated Code of Regulations (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8,18, 2013)
4.1  Investor Rights Agreement of Multi-Color Corporation, dated as of October 3, 2011, by and between Multi-Color Corporation and each of the Investors whose name appears on the signature pages thereof (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2011)
4.2  FormIndenture governing the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022, dated as of Senior Indenture (incorporatedNovember 21, 2014, by reference from Registration Statement No. 333-179535)

4.3Form of Subordinated Indenture (incorporated by reference from Registration Statement No. 333-179535)
10.1Share Sale and Purchase Agreement dated January 21, 2008 among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Limited, Collotype Labels International Pty Limitedthe Guarantors party thereto and certain other partiesU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2008)November 21, 2014)
10.2Credit Agreement dated as of February 29, 2008 among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Limited, Bank of America as Administrative Agent and Westpac Banking Corporation as Australian Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2008)
10.3  10.1  Guaranty and Collateral Agreement dated as of February 29, 2008 among Multi-Color Corporation, other parties thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as the Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2008)

10.4  10.2  Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of February 29, 2008 made by Multi-Color Corporation Australian Acquisition Pty Limited in favor of Westpac Banking Corporation, as Australian Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2008)
10.5Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 28, 2010 between the Company and the shareholders of Guidotti CentroStampa SpA (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
10.6First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 28, 2010, by and among the Company, Collotype International Holdings Pty Limited, Bank of America as Administrative Agent, and Westpac Banking Corporation as Australian Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010)
10.7Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 8, 2010 between the Company and the shareholders of SAS Monroe Etiquette (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2010)
10.8Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 29, 2011, between the Company and the shareholder of La Cromografica S.R.L. (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2011)
10.9Shareholder Agreement of Collotype Labels (Chile) S.A. and Collotype Labels (Argentina) S.A., between MCC investments Chile Limitada, Etikolor S.A. and Fernando Aravena Escobar dated May 2, 2011 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2011)
10.10Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into as of August 26, 2011, by and among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Ltd., the Approving Lenders, certain Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and Westpac Banking Corporation (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2011)
10.11Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into as of October 3, 2011, by and among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Ltd., the Approving Lenders, certain Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and Westpac Banking Corporation thereof (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2011)
10.12Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Multi-Color Corporation and the Shareholders of Warszawski Dom Handlowy S.A. dated June 22, 2011 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011)
10.13Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into as of November 8, 2012, by and among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Ltd., the Approving Lenders, certain Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., and Westpac Banking Corporation (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2012)
10.14  10.3  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2014, by and between Graphic Packaging International, Inc., Bluegrass Labels Company, LLC, MCC-Norwood, LLC, and Multi-Color Corporation (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 10, 2014)
10.15  10.4  SeventhAmended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 21, 2014 among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Limited, certain Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Westpac Banking Corporation, Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., “Robobank Nederland”, New York Branch, Keybank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., BMO Harris Financing, Inc., the Other Lenders Party Hereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and BMO Capital Markets (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014)
  10.5First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, made and entered into as of February 3, 2014,October 28, 2015, by and among Multi-Color Corporation, Collotype International Holdings Pty Ltd.,Limited, the Approving Lenders, certain Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. and Westpac Banking Corporation (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 10, 2014)for the quarter ending September 30, 2015)

  MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS AND COMPENSATION PLANS
10.16  10.6  2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s proxy materials filed in connection with the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)
10.17  10.7  Amendment to 2003 Stock Incentive Plan dated August 16, 2007 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007)
10.18  10.8  2006 Director Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s proxy materials filed in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)
10.19  10.9  Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Multi-Color Corporation and Nigel A. Vinecombe effective as of May 22, 2012January 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the fiscal yearquarter ending MarchDecember 31, 2012)2015)
10.20Employment Letter dated August 11, 2010 regarding compensation of Sharon Birkett (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2010)
10.21  10.10  Amendment to 2003 Stock Incentive Plan dated September 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2010)
10.22  10.11  2012 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)
10.23  10.12  Employment Agreement between Multi-Color CorporationAmended and Floyd Needham effective as of April 1, 2014
10.24Restated Employment Agreement between Multi-Color Corporation and Vadis Rodato effective as of AprilJanuary 1, 2014
16Letter of Grant Thornton2016 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 20, 2013)10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2015)
  10.13Employment Agreement between Multi-Color Corporation and Sharon Birkett effective as of July 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2014)
  10.14Form of Indemnification Agreement dated February 3, 2015, by and between Multi-Color Corporation and the respective Indemnified Representative (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2014)
  10.15Employment Letter dated December 2, 2014 regarding compensation of Tim Lutz (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015)
  10.16Addendum to Employment Letter dated January 20, 2016 regarding compensation of Tim Lutz (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016)
  10.17Form of Restricted Share Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015)
  10.18Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015)
  10.19Employment Agreement between Multi-Color Corporation and David Buse effective as of January 1, 2016 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2015)

21  Subsidiaries of Multi-Color Corporation
23.1Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.2  23  Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24  Power of Attorney (included as part of signature page)
31.1  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION
Dated: June 13, 2014May 30, 2017
  By: 

/s/ NigelVadis A. VinecombeRodato

   NigelVadis A. VinecombeRodato
   

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

We, the undersigned directors and officers of Multi-Color Corporation, hereby severally constitute NigelVadis A. VinecombeRodato and Sharon E. Birkett, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

Name

  

Capacity

 

Date

/s/ NigelVadis A. Vinecombe

Nigel A. VinecombeRodato

  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (PrincipalMay 30, 2017
Vadis A. Rodato(Principal Executive Officer) June 13, 2014

/s/ Sharon E. Birkett

Sharon E. Birkett

  

Vice President, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, Secretary

May 30, 2017
Sharon E. Birkett(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Timothy P. Lutz

  June 13, 2014Chief Accounting OfficerMay 30, 2017
Timothy P. Lutz(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Nigel A. Vinecombe

Executive Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMay 30, 2017
Nigel A. Vinecombe

/s/ Ari J. Benacerraf

DirectorMay 30, 2017
Ari J. Benacerraf

/s/ Robert R. Buck

Robert R. Buck

Chairman of the Board of DirectorsJune 13, 2014

/s/ Ari J. Benacerraf

Ari J. Benacerraf

  Director June 13, 2014May 30, 2017
Robert R. Buck

/s/ Charles B. Connolly

Charles B. Connolly

  Director June 13, 2014May 30, 2017

/s/ Lorrence T. Kellar

Lorrence T. Kellar

Charles B. Connolly
  Director June 13, 2014

/s/ Roger A. Keller

Roger A. Keller

DirectorJune 13, 2014

/s/ Thomas M. Mohr

Thomas M. Mohr

DirectorJune 13, 2014

/s/ Simon T. Roberts

DirectorMay 30, 2017
Simon T. Roberts

/s/ Matthew M. Walsh

  Director June 13, 2014May 30, 2017
Matthew M. Walsh

 

6870