Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ~~Yes~~ x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ~~Yes~~ ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes~~ x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ~~Yes~~ x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ~~Yes~~ ¨ No x

As of June 30, ~~2014, 33,240,930~~2016, 46,369,391 shares of Life Storage, Inc.’s Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, were outstanding, and the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of Life Storage, Inc. was approximately ~~$2,505,480,768~~$4,779,975,682 (based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, ~~2014)~~2016).

As of February 13, ~~2015, 34,174,772~~2017, 46,487,121 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

As of June 30, 2016, the aggregate market value of the 196,008 units of limited partnership (the “OP Units”) held by non-affiliates of Life Storage LP was $20,565,159 (based on the closing price of the Common Stock of Life Storage, Inc., the sole general partner of Life Storage LP, on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2016). (For this calculation, the market value of all OP Units beneficially owned by Life Storage, Inc. has been excluded.)

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the ~~2015~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the ~~registrant’s~~registrants’ fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2016.

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Life Storage, Inc., formerly known as Sovran Self Storage, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and Life Storage LP, formerly known as Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Parent Company is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns its assets and conducts its operations through the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Effective August 15, 2016, the Parent Company changed its name from “Sovran Self Storage, Inc.” to “Life Storage, Inc.” and the Operating Partnership changed its name from “Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership” to “Life Storage LP”. The Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and their consolidated subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as the “Company.” In addition, terms such as “we,” “us,” or “our” used in this report may refer to the Company, the Parent Company and/or the Operating Partnership.

Life Storage Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent Company (“Holdings”), is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership; the Parent Company is a limited partner of the Operating Partnership, and through its ownership of Holdings and its limited partnership interest, controls the operations of the Operating Partnership, holding a 99.5% ownership interest therein as of December 31, 2016. The remaining ownership interests in the Operating Partnership are held by certain former owners of assets acquired by the Operating Partnership. As the owner of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company has full and complete authority over the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day operations and management.

Management operates the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management teams of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are identical.

There are few differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the note disclosures in this report. The Company believes it is important to understand the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how these entities operate as a consolidated enterprise. The Parent Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of the partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. As a result, the Parent Company does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the owner of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing the debt obligations of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and, directly or indirectly, holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by the Parent Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units of the Operating Partnership.

The substantive difference between the Parent Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s filings is the fact that the Parent Company is a REIT with public equity, while the Operating Partnership is a partnership with no publicly traded equity. In the financial statements, this difference is primarily reflected in the equity (or capital for the Operating Partnership) section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity (or capital). Apart from the different equity treatment, the consolidated financial statements of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are nearly identical.

The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership into a single report will:

In order to highlight the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosures of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to such disclosures as those of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and real estate ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Parent Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.

As the owner of the general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and the Parent Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. The separate discussions of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company’s operations on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

This report also includes separate Item 9A - Controls and Procedures sections, signature pages and Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Parent Company and the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Operating Partnership have made the requisite certifications and that the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words “intends,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Company’s ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Company’s existing business and operations; the Company’s ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Company’s existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Company’s outstanding floating rate debt; the Company’s ability to comply with debt covenants; any future ratings on the Company’s debt instruments; regional concentration of the Company’s business may subject it to economic downturns in the states of Florida and Texas; the Company’s reliance on its call center; the Company’s cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of operating expenses, principal, interest and dividends; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.

~~Sovran~~Effective August 15, 2016, the Parent Company changed its name from “Sovran Self Storage, Inc. ~~together~~” to “Life Storage, Inc.” and the Operating Partnership changed its name from “Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership” to “Life Storage LP”. Also, consistent with ~~its direct~~these name changes, and ~~indirect subsidiaries~~in connection with the rebranding of our storage facilities from “Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®” to “Life Storage^®”, the name of the general partner of the Operating Partnership has been changed from “Sovran Holdings, Inc.” to “Life Storage Holdings, Inc.” and ~~its consolidated joint ventures,~~the name of the Parent Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary changed from “Uncle Bob’s Management, LLC” to “Life Storage Solutions, LLC”. This name change is intended to be responsive to the ~~extent appropriate~~changing demographics and consumer trends in the ~~applicable context, (the “Company,~~self-storage industry. We believe that the change to the “Life Storage^®” ~~“We,~~name will allow the Company to continue to maintain its position as a leader in the U.S. self-storage industry and may provide additional growth opportunities that may not have been available under the “Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®” ~~“Our,” or “Sovran”)~~name.

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed real estate ~~investment trust (“REIT”)~~company that acquires, owns and manages self-storage properties. We refer to the self-storage properties in which we have an ownership interest, lease, and/or are managed by us as “Properties.” We began operations on June 26, 1995. We were formed to continue the business of our predecessor company, which had engaged in the self-storage business since 1985. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, we ~~held~~had an ownership ~~interests~~interest in ~~leased,~~ and/or managed ~~518 Properties consisting of approximately 35.5 million net rentable square feet, situated~~659 self-storage properties in ~~25 states.~~29 states under the names Life Storage^® and Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®. Among our ~~518~~659 self-storage properties are 39 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture (Sovran HHF Storage Holdings LLC) of which we are a 20% owner, 30 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture (Sovran HHF Storage Holdings II LLC) of which we are a 15% owner, 17and 26 properties that we manage and ~~in which~~ have no ownership ~~interest, and~~interest. We are also a 20% owner in an unconsolidated joint venture (191 III Life Storage Holdings LLC) which acquired four properties in January 2017 that we ~~lease.~~have managed since acquisition. We believe we are the fifth largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on square feet owned and managed. ~~Our~~All of our Properties will conduct business under the ~~user-friendly~~customer-friendly name Life Storage^®. At December 31, 2016, there remain stores in certain markets that continue to operate under the name Uncle Bob’s ~~Self-Storage®.~~Self Storage^® and will continue to do so until our transition to the Life Storage^® name is complete in the first half of 2017.

At December 31, ~~2014, we own~~2016, the Parent Company owned an indirect interest in ~~497~~633 of the Properties through ~~a limited partnership (the “Partnership”).~~the Operating Partnership, which excludes the 26 properties that we manage and have no ownership interest. Included in the ~~497~~633 properties are the 69 facilities in our unconsolidated joint ventures. At December 31, 2014 the Partnership also leased, but had no ownership in, four facilities under a long-term lease with the option to buy the facilities during a 16 month window starting in February 2015. The Partnership exercised its option to purchase the properties and acquired the four facilities for $120 million in February 2015. In total, we own a 99.5% economic interest in the Operating Partnership and unaffiliated third parties own collectively a 0.5% limited partnership interest at December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. We believe that this structure, commonly known as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust (“UPREIT”), facilitates our ability to acquire properties by using units of the Operating Partnership as currency. By utilizing interests in the Operating Partnership as currency in facility acquisitions, we may partially defer the seller’s income tax liability which in turn may allow us to obtain more favorable pricing.

The Parent Company was incorporated on April 19, 1995 under Maryland law. The Operating Partnership was formed on April 19, 1995 as a Delaware limited partnership and has engaged in virtually all aspects of the self-storage business, including the development, acquisition, management, ownership and operation of self-storage facilities. Our principal executive offices are located at 6467 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221, our telephone number is (716) 633-1850 and our ~~website is~~websites arewww.lifestorage.com andwww.unclebobs.com.

We seek to enhance shareholder value through internal growth and acquisition of additional storage properties. Internal growth is achieved through aggressive property management: optimizing rental rates, increasing occupancy levels, controlling costs, maximizing collections, and strategically expanding and enhancing the

Properties. Should economic conditions warrant, we may develop new properties. We believe that there continue to be opportunities for growth through acquisitions, and ~~constantly~~ seek to acquire self-storage properties that are susceptible to realization of increased economies of scale and improved performance through application of our expertise.

We believe that self-storage facilities offer inexpensive storage space to residential and commercial users. In addition to fully enclosed and secure storage space, many facilities also offer outside storage for automobiles, recreational vehicles and boats. Better facilities, such as those owned and/or managed by the Company, are usually fenced and well lighted with automated access systems, surveillance cameras, and have a full-time manager. Our customers rent space on a month-to-month basis and typically have access to their storage space up to 15 hours a day and in certain circumstances are provided with 24-hour access. Individual storage spaces are secured by the customer’s lock, and the customer has sole control of access to the space.

According to the ~~2015~~2017 Self-Storage Almanac, of the ~~approximately~~estimated 51,000 facilities in the United States (including both core and non-core storage businesses), approximately ~~13%~~15.0% are managed by the ten largest operators. The remainder of the industry is characterized by numerous small, local operators. The scarcity of capital available to small operators for acquisitions and expansions, internet marketing, ~~and~~ call centers, and the potential for savings through economies of scale are factors that are leading to consolidation in the industry. We believe that, as a result of this trend, significant growth opportunities exist for operators with proven management systems and sufficient capital resources to grow either through acquisitions or third party management platforms.

We have ~~nearly 30~~31 years of experience managing ~~self storage~~self-storage facilities, and the combined experience of our key personnel makes us one of the leaders in the industry. All of our stores conduct business under the customer-friendly names Life Storage^® or Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®. At December 31, 2016, there remain stores in certain markets that continue to operate under the ~~user-friendly~~ name of Uncle Bob’s Self ~~Storage®,~~Storage^® and wewill continue to do so until our full transition to the Life Storage^® name is complete in the first half of 2017. We employ the following strategies with respect to our property management:

We recognize the importance of quality people to the success of an organization. Accordingly, we hire and train to ensure that all associates can reach their full potential. Each strives to conduct themselves in accordance with our core values: Teamwork, Respect, Accountability, Integrity, and Innovation. In turn, we support them with state of the art training tools including an online learning management system, a company intranet and a network of certified training personnel. Every store team also has frequent, and sometimes daily, interaction with an Area Manager, a Regional Vice President, an Accounting Representative, and other support personnel. As such, our store associates are held to high standards for customer service, store appearance, financial performance, and overall operations.

Our employees benefit from a wide array of training and development opportunities. New store employees undergo a comprehensive, proprietary training program designed to drive sales and operational results while ensuring the delivery of quality customer service. To supplement their initial training, employees enjoy continuing edification, coaching, and performance feedback throughout their tenure.

All learning and development activities are facilitated through our online ~~Learning~~training and ~~Performance Management System internally named eBOB. eBOB~~development portal. This portal delivers and tracks hundreds of on-demand computer based training and compliance courses; it also administers tests, surveys, and the employee appraisal process. ~~Sovran’s~~Life Storage’s training and development program encompasses the tools and support we deem essential to the success of our employees and business.

We believe the avenues for attracting and capturing new customers have changed dramatically over the years. As such, we have implemented the following strategies to market our properties and increase profitability:

We know that our ~~275,000~~360,000 customers require more than just a storage space. Knowing this, we offer a wide range of other products and services that fulfill their needs while providing us with ancillary income. Whereas our ~~Uncle Bob’s~~Life Storage trucks are available with no rental charge for new move-in customers, they are available for rent to non-customers and existing customers. We also rent moving dollies and blankets, and we carry a wide assortment of moving and packing supplies including boxes, tape, locks, and other essential items. For those customers who do not carry storage insurance, we make available renters insurance through a third party carrier, on which we earn ~~a commission.~~an administrative fee. We also receive incidental income from billboards and cell towers.

Each of our primary business functions is linked to our customized computer applications, many of which are proprietary. These systems provide for consistent, timely and accurate flow of information throughout our critical platforms:

Our proprietary revenue management system is constantly evolving through the efforts of our revenue management team comprised of a group of analysts. We have the ability to change pricing instantaneously for any one unit type, at any single location, based on the occupancy, competition, and forecasted changes in demand. By analyzing current customer rent tenures, we can implement rental rate increases at optimal times to increase revenues. Advanced pricing analytics enables us to reduce the amount of concessions, attracting a more stable customer base and discouraging short-term price shoppers. This system continues to drive ~~revenues~~revenue stability and/or growth throughout our portfolio.

We take great pride in the appearance and structural integrity of our Properties. All of our Properties go through a thorough annual inspection performed by experienced Project Managers. Those inspections provide the basis for short and long term planned projects that are all performed under a standardized set of specifications. Routine maintenance such as landscaping, pest control, and snowplowing is contracted to local providers who have a clear understanding of our standards. Further, our software tracks repairs, monitors contractor performance and measures the useful life of assets. As with many other aspects of our Company, our size has allowed us to enjoy relatively low maintenance costs because we have the benefit of economies of scale in purchasing, travel, and overhead absorption. In addition, we continually look to green alternatives and implement energy saving alternatives as new technology becomes available. This includes the installation of solar panels, ~~and~~ LED lighting, energy efficient air conditioning units, and cool roofs which are ~~both~~all environmentally friendly and have the potential to reduce energy consumption (thereby reducing costs) in the buildings in which they are installed. We continue to implement and expand the Company’s solar panel initiative which has reduced energy consumption and costs at those installed locations.

We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property. We have not received notice from any governmental authority or private party of any material environmental noncompliance, claim, or liability in connection with any of the Properties, and are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of the Properties that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The Properties are also generally subject to the same types of local regulations governing other real property, including zoning ordinances. We believe that the Properties are in substantial compliance with all such regulations.

Each of the Properties is covered by fire and property insurance (including comprehensive ~~liability)~~liability and business interruption), and all-risk property insurance policies, which are provided by reputable companies and on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we maintain a policy insuring against environmental liabilities resulting from tenant storage on terms customary for the industry, and title insurance insuring fee title to the Company-owned Properties in an amount that we believe to be adequate.

We operate, and we intend to continue to operate, in such a manner as to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), but no assurance can be given that we will at all times so qualify. To the extent that we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to our shareholders. We have elected to treat one of our subsidiaries as a taxable

REIT subsidiary. In general, our taxable REIT subsidiary may perform additional services for customers and generally may engage in certain real estate or non-real estate related business. Our taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to corporate federal and state income taxes. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - REIT Qualification and Distribution Requirements.”

The primary factors upon which competition in the self-storage industry is based are location, rental rates, suitability of the property’s design to prospective customers’ needs, and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. We believe we compete successfully on these bases. The extent of competition depends significantly on local market conditions. We seek to locate facilities in a manner in which we can increase market share while not adversely affecting any of our existing locations in that market. However, the number of self-storage facilities in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the performance of any of the Properties.

Several of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater financial resources than we do. These larger operators may, among other possible advantages, be capable of greater leverage and the payment of higher prices for acquisitions.

While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may, at our discretion, invest in mortgage and other real estate interests related to self-storage properties in a manner consistent with our qualification as a REIT. We may also retain a purchase money mortgage for a portion of the sale price in connection with the disposition of Properties from time to time. Should investment opportunities become available, we may look to acquire self-storage properties via a joint-venture partnership or similar entity. We may or may not elect to have a significant investment in such a venture, but would use such an opportunity to expand our portfolio of branded and managed properties.

Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification, we also may invest in securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.

Any disposition decision of our Properties is based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the (i) potential to continue to increase cash flow and value, (ii) sale price, (iii) strategic fit with the rest of our portfolio, (iv) potential for, or existence of, environmental or regulatory issues, (v) alternative uses of capital, and (vi) maintaining qualification as a REIT.

During 2016, we sold eight non-strategic properties in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $34.1 million, resulting in a gain of approximately $15.3 million. During 2015, we sold three non-strategic storage facilities purchased during 2014 and 2015 in Missouri and South Carolina for net proceeds of approximately $4.6 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $0.5 million. During 2014, we sold two non-strategic storage facilities in Texas for net proceeds of approximately $11.0 million resulting in a gain of approximately $5.2 million. During 2013, we sold four non-strategic storage facilities in Florida, Ohio, and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $2.4 million. During 2012, we sold 17 non-strategic storage facilities in Maryland, Michigan, and Texas for net proceeds of approximately $47.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $4.5 million.

We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to our shareholders. However, future distributions by us will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the actual cash available for distribution, our financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not include capital gains). Under certain circumstances, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet the minimum requirements.

Our Board of Directors currently limits the amount of debt that may be incurred by us to less than 50% of the sum of the market value of our issued and outstanding Common and Preferred Stock plus our debt. We, however, may from time to time re-evaluate and modify our borrowing policy in light of then current economic

conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital, market values of properties, growth and acquisition opportunities and other factors. In addition to our Board of Directors’ debt limits, our most restrictive debt covenants limit our leverage. However, we believe cash flow from operations, access to the capital markets and access to our credit facility, as described below, are adequate to execute our current business plan and remain in compliance with our debt covenants.

We have a ~~$300~~$500 million revolving line of credit bearing interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 the margin was ~~1.30%~~1.10%). At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, there was ~~$250.3~~$247 million available on the unsecured line of ~~credit without considering the additional availability under the credit facility expansion feature.~~credit. The revolving line of credit has a maturity date of December 10, 2019.

~~In 2014,~~On March 3, 2015, the Parent Company completed the public offering of 1,380,000 shares of its common stock at $90.40 per share. Net proceeds to the Company ~~utilized~~after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $119.5 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the indebtedness outstanding on the Company’s unsecured line of credit.

On January 20, 2016, the Company completed the public offering of 2,645,000 shares of its common stock at $105.75 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $269.7 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of the indebtedness then outstanding on the Company’s unsecured line of credit.

On June 20, 2016, the Company issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% unsecured senior notes due July 1, 2026 (the “2026 Senior Notes”). Net proceeds to the Company after original issue discount, underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $591.2 million. On July 15, 2016, the proceeds from the 2026 Senior Notes, the proceeds from the Company’s common stock offering in May 2016, and draws on the Company’s line of credit were used to fund the acquisition of LifeStorage, LP. In conjunction with the issuance of the 2026 Senior Notes, the Company settled its $150 million notional forward starting swap agreements for cash of approximately $9.2 million.

During 2015, the Company also issued 949,911 shares of common stock under the Company’s continuous equity offering program (“Equity Program”) ~~pursuant to which we could sell from time to time up to $225 million in aggregate offering~~at a weighted average issue price of ~~shares~~$96.80 per share, generating net proceeds of ~~our common stock.~~$90.6 million. During 2014, we issued ~~approximately 0.9 million~~924,403 shares under the Equity Program and ~~0.3 million~~359,102 shares under our previous Equity Program for net proceeds of approximately $99.2 million. During ~~2013, we issued approximately 1.67 million~~2016, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock under ~~our previous~~the Equity ~~Program for net proceeds of approximately $107.8 million. During 2012 we issued approximately 1.39 million shares under our previous Equity Program for net proceeds of approximately $75.3 million.~~Program. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company has
~~$151.3~~ $59.3 million availability for issuance of shares under the ~~current~~ Equity ~~Program.~~Program which expires in May 2017.

To the extent that we desire to obtain additional capital to pay distributions, to provide working capital, to pay existing indebtedness or to finance acquisitions, expansions or development of new properties, we may utilize amounts available under the line of credit, common or preferred stock offerings, floating or fixed rate debt financing, retention of cash flow (subject to satisfying our distribution requirements under the REIT rules) or a combination of these methods. Additional debt financing may also be obtained through mortgages on our Properties, which may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized and may contain cross-default provisions. We have not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single Property or on our portfolio as a whole, although certain of our existing term loans contain limits on overall mortgage indebtedness. For additional information regarding borrowings, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations -~~ Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 76 to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith.

We currently employ a total of ~~1,378~~1,537 employees, including ~~518~~659 property managers, 3345 area managers, and ~~631~~581 associate managers and part-time employees. At our headquarters, in addition to our six senior executive officers, we employ ~~190~~246 people engaged in various support activities, including accounting, human resources, customer care, and management information systems. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be excellent.

We file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330. We file this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our web site athttp://~~www.unclebobs.com~~www.lifestorage.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. In addition, our Codes of Ethics and Charters of our Governance Committee, Audit Committee, and Compensation Committee are available free of charge on our website athttp://~~www.unclebobs.com~~www.lifestorage.com.

Also, copies of our annual report and Charters of our Governance Committee, Audit Committee, and Compensation Committee will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 6467 Main Street, Williamsville, NY 14221.

You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in or incorporated by reference into our Form 10-K, as part of your evaluation of the Company. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In such case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We have completed hundreds of acquisitions of self-storage facilities since our initial public offering of common stock in June 1995. Our strategy is to continue to grow by acquiring additional self-storage facilities. Acquisitions entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. Our judgments with respect to the prices paid for acquired self-storage facilities and the costs of any improvements required to bring an acquired property up to our standards may prove to be inaccurate. Acquisitions also involve general investment risks associated with any new real estate investment.

Unsecured Credit Facility, Term Notes and ~~Term~~Senior Notes.We have a line of credit and term note agreements with a syndicate of financial institutions and other ~~lenders.~~lenders, along with senior debt of $600 million. This ~~unsecured credit facility and the term notes are~~indebtedness is recourse to us and the required payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any of the properties declines. The ~~unsecured credit facility limits~~facilities limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, except in limited circumstances.

Rising Interest Rates. Indebtedness that we incur under the unsecured credit facility and bank term notes bears interest at a variable rate. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could increase our interest expense, which would reduce our cash available for distribution and our ability to pay expected distributions to our shareholders. We manage our exposure to rising interest rates using interest rate swaps and other available mechanisms. If the amount of our indebtedness bearing interest at a variable rate increases, our unsecured credit facility may require us to enter into additional interest rate swaps.

Refinancing May Not Be Available.It may be necessary for us to refinance our ~~term notes and our unsecured credit facility~~indebtedness through additional debt financing or equity offerings. If we were unable to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms, we might be forced to dispose of some of our self-storage facilities upon disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses to us and might adversely affect the cash available for distribution. If prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates on refinancings, our interest expense would increase, which would adversely affect our cash available for distribution and our ability to pay expected distributions to shareholders.

Covenants and Risk of Default. Our ~~unsecured credit facility and term notes~~loan instruments require us to operate within certain covenants, including financial covenants with respect to leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and dividend limitations. If we violate any of these covenants or otherwise default under ~~our unsecured credit facility or term notes,~~these instruments, then our lenders could declare all indebtedness under these facilities to be immediately due and payable which would have a material adverse effect on our business and could require us to sell self-storage facilities under distressed conditions and seek replacement financing on substantially more expensive terms.

Reduction in or Loss of Credit Rating.Certain of our debt instruments require us to maintain an investment grade rating from at least one and in some cases two debt ratings agencies. Should we ~~fail to attain an investment grade~~receive a reduction in our credit rating from the agencies, the interest rate on our line of credit would increase by ~~0.30%,~~up to 0.50% and the interest rate on $325 million of our bank term notes would increase by ~~0.40%, and~~up to 0.65%. Should we fail to attain an investment grade rating from the agencies, the interest rates on ~~our $150 million term note due 2016,~~ our $100 million term note due 2021 and our $175 million term note due 2024 would each increase by 1.750%.

Our Board of Directors currently has a policy of limiting the amount of our debt at the time of incurrence to less than 50% of the sum of the market value of our issued and outstanding common stock and preferred stock plus the amount of our debt at the time that debt is incurred. However, our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness we might incur. Accordingly, our Board of Directors could alter or eliminate the current policy limitation on borrowing without a vote of our shareholders. We could become highly leveraged if this policy were changed. However, our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our ~~bank credit arrangements.~~debt instruments.

We Are Subject to the Risks Posed by Fluctuating Demand and Significant Competition in the Self-Storage Industry

Our self-storage facilities are subject to all operating risks common to the self-storage industry. These risks include but are not limited to the following:

Our current strategy is to acquire interests only in self-storage facilities. Consequently, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. Our self-storage facilities compete with other self-storage facilities in their geographic markets. As a result of competition, the self-storage facilities could experience a decrease in occupancy levels and rental rates, which would decrease our cash available for distribution. We compete in operations and for acquisition opportunities with companies that have substantial financial resources. Competition may reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities offered to us and increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. The self-storage industry has at times experienced overbuilding in response to perceived increases in demand. A recurrence of overbuilding might cause us to experience a decrease in occupancy levels, limit our ability to increase rents, and compel us to offer discounted rents.

Our Real Estate Investments Are Illiquid and Are Subject to Uninsurable Risks and Government Regulation

General Risks. Our investments are subject to varying degrees of risk generally related to the ownership of real property. The underlying value of our real estate investments and our income and ability to make distributions to our shareholders are dependent upon our ability to operate the self-storage facilities in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase cash available for distribution. Income from our self-storage facilities may be adversely affected by the following factors:

Illiquidity of Real Estate May Limit its Value. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to vary our portfolio of self-storage facilities in response to changes in economic and other conditions is limited. In addition, provisions of the Code may limit our ability to profit on the sale of self-storage facilities held for fewer than two years. We may be unable to dispose of a facility when we find disposition advantageous or necessary and the sale price of any disposition may not equal or exceed the amount of our investment.

Uninsured and Underinsured Losses Could Reduce the Value of our Self Storage Facilities. Some losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, that we potentially face with respect to our self-storage facilities may be uninsurable or not insurable at an acceptable cost. Our management uses its discretion in determining amounts, coverage limits and deductibility provisions of insurance, with a view to acquiring appropriate insurance on our investments at a reasonable cost and on suitable terms. These decisions may result in insurance coverage that, in the event of a substantial loss, would not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of our lost investment. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to replace a property after it has been damaged or destroyed. Under those circumstances, the insurance proceeds received by us might not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to a particular property.

Possible Liability Relating to Environmental Matters. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under, or in that property. Those laws often impose liability even if the owner or operator did not cause or know of the presence of hazardous or toxic substances and even if the storage of those substances was in violation of a customer’s lease. In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure of the owner to address their presence on the property, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to borrow using that real property as collateral. In connection with the ownership of the self-storage facilities, we may be potentially liable for any of those costs.

Americans with Disabilities Act. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, generally requires that buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities. A determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA could result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. If we were required to make modifications to comply with the ADA, our results of operations and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.

Limitation on Ownership and Transfer of Shares. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code. To limit the possibility that we will fail to qualify as a REIT under this test, our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (“Articles of Incorporation”) include ownership limits and transfer restrictions on shares of our stock. Our Articles of Incorporation limit ownership of our issued and outstanding stock by any single shareholder to 9.8% of the aggregate value of our outstanding stock, except that the ownership by some of our shareholders is limited to 15%.

Our Board of Directors may waive the ownership limits if it is satisfied that ownership by those shareholders in excess of those limits will not jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Code or in the event it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to be a REIT. Waivers have been granted to the former holders of our Series C preferred stock, FMR Corporation, Cohen & Steers, Inc. and Invesco Advisers, Inc. A transfer of our common stock and/or preferred stock to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limits may not be effective under some circumstances.

Other Limitations. Other limitations could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some, or a majority, of our outstanding common stock might receive a premium for their shares of our common stock that exceeds the then prevailing market price or that those holders might believe to be otherwise in their best interest. The issuance of additional shares of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of ~~Sovran~~the Company even if a change in control were in the shareholders’ interest. In addition, the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, imposes restrictions and requires specific procedures with respect to the acquisition of stated levels of share ownership and business combinations, including combinations with interested shareholders. These provisions of the MGCL could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of ~~Sovran~~Life Storage even if a change in control were in the shareholders’ interest. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the MGCL control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. However, this provision may be amended or eliminated at any time. In addition, under the Operating Partnership’s agreement of limited partnership, in general, we may not merge, consolidate or engage in any combination with another person or sell all or substantially all of our assets unless that transaction includes the merger or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Operating Partnership, which requires the approval of the holders of 75% of the limited partnership interests thereof. If we were to own less than 75% of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, this provision of the limited partnership agreement could have the effect of delaying or preventing us from engaging in some change of control transactions.

We intend to continue to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT under the Code. We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not binding on the IRS or any court. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. Continued qualification as a REIT depends upon our continuing ability to meet various requirements concerning, among other things, the ownership of our outstanding stock, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amount of our distributions to our shareholders. The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries and joint ventures further complicates the application of the REIT requirements for us. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status and, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs and the ongoing importance of factual determinations, we cannot provide any assurance that we will continue to qualify as a REIT. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts and the IRS might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and are unable to avail ourselves of certain

savings provisions set forth in the Code, we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be ineligible for qualification as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which our qualification was lost. As a result, distributions to the shareholders would be reduced for each of the years involved. Although we currently intend to continue to operate in a manner designed to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our Board of Directors to revoke our REIT election. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and are able to avail ourselves of one or more of the statutory savings provisions in order to maintain our REIT status, we would nevertheless be required to pay penalty taxes of $50,000 or more for each such failure.

We Will Pay Some Taxes Even if We Qualify as a REIT, Reducing Cash Available for Shareholders

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to pay some federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. For example, we will be subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including capital gains). Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which dividends paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The determination as to whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale. While we will undertake sales of assets if those assets become inconsistent with our long-term strategic or return objectives, we do not believe that those sales should be considered prohibited transactions, but there can be no assurance that the IRS would not contend otherwise. The need to avoid prohibited transactions could cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that might otherwise be in our best interest to sell.

One of our subsidiaries has elected to be treated as a “taxable REIT subsidiary” of the Company for federal income tax purposes. A taxable REIT subsidiary is taxed as a regular corporation and is limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made to us in excess of a certain amount. In addition, if we receive or accrue certain amounts and the underlying economic arrangements among our taxable REIT subsidiary and us are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties, we will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on those payments in excess of amounts deemed reasonable between unrelated parties.

Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs. To the extent that we are or any taxable REIT subsidiary is required to pay federal, foreign, state or local taxes, we will have less cash available for distribution to shareholders.

Complying with REIT Requirements May Limit Our Ability to Hedge Effectively and May Cause Us to Incur Tax Liabilities

The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our assets and operations. Under these provisions, any income that we generate from transactions intended to hedge our interest rate risk will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests if the instrument hedges interest rate risk on liabilities used to carry or acquire real estate assets or manages the risk of certain currency fluctuations, and such instrument is properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations. Income from hedging transactions that do not meet these requirements will generally constitute non-qualifying income for purposes of both the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit our use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous or implement those hedges through a taxable REIT subsidiary. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our taxable REIT subsidiary would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in our taxable REIT subsidiary will generally not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried back or forward against past or future taxable income in the taxable REIT subsidiary.

Complying with the REIT Requirements May Cause Us to Forgo and/or Liquidate Otherwise Attractive Investments

To qualify as a REIT, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts that we distribute to our shareholders and the ownership of our shares. To meet these tests, we may be required to take or forgo taking actions that we would otherwise consider advantageous. For instance, in order to satisfy the gross income or asset tests applicable to REITs under the Code, we may be required to forgo investments that we otherwise would make. Furthermore, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio otherwise attractive investments. In addition, we may be required to make distributions to shareholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. These actions could reduce our income and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our investment performance.

If the Operating Partnership Fails to Qualify as a Partnership for Federal Income Tax Purposes, We Could Fail to Qualify as a REIT and Suffer Other Adverse Consequences

We believe that ~~our~~the Operating Partnership is organized and operated in a manner so as to be treated as a partnership and not an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation, for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, ~~our~~the Operating Partnership is not subject to federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of the partners is allocated its share of ~~our~~the Operating Partnership’s income. No assurance can be provided, however, that the IRS will not challenge ~~our~~the Operating Partnership’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating ~~our~~the Operating Partnership as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, accordingly, would cease to qualify as a REIT. Also, the failure of the Operating Partnership to qualify as a partnership would cause it to become subject to federal corporate income tax, which would reduce significantly the amount of its cash available for distribution to its partners, including us.

U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs and investments in REITs may change, which may result in the loss of our tax benefits of operating as a REIT.

Current U.S. federal income tax treatment of a REIT and an investment in a REIT may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time. The administration of President Trump and the leaders of the House of Representatives and the Senate have expressed interest in passing comprehensive tax reform this year. The descriptions of tax reform proposals have not specifically addressed the treatment of REITs, amendments to U.S. federal income tax laws and interpretations of these laws could adversely affect us and the tax consequences of an investment in our common shares.

Some of the tax benefits identified as possibly being eliminated or reduced include benefits that have been important to the real estate industry, including REITs, such as eliminating the like-kind exchange rules or the deduction of net interest expense. In addition, tax reform proposals contemplate reductions in corporate tax rates. Substantially reduced corporate tax rates could possibly reduce or eliminate the relative attractiveness of REITs as an entity for owning real estate.

We cannot predict how changes in U.S. federal income tax law will affect us or our investors nor can we predict the long-term impact of proposed tax reforms on the real estate industry.

In ~~2014,~~2016, our Board of Directors authorized and we declared quarterly common stock dividends of ~~$0.68~~$0.85 per share in January, and $0.95 per share for April, July and October, ~~the equivalent of an~~for a total 2016 dividend per share annual rate of ~~$2.72~~$3.70 per share. In addition, our board of directors authorized and we declared ~~an increased~~a quarterly common stock dividend of ~~$0.75~~$0.95 per share in January ~~2015.~~2017. We can provide no assurance that our board will not reduce or eliminate entirely dividend distributions on our common stock in the future.

Our Board of Directors will continue to evaluate our distribution policy on a quarterly basis as they monitor the capital markets and the impact of the economy on our operations. The decisions to authorize and pay dividends on our common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors in light of conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, debt maturities, the availability of capital, applicable REIT and legal restrictions and the general overall economic conditions and other factors. Any change in our dividend policy could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

One of the factors that may influence the price of our common stock in public trading markets or in private transactions is the annual yield on our common stock as compared to yields on other financial instruments. An increase in market interest rates will result in higher yields on other financial instruments, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Regional Concentration of Our Business May Subject Us to Economic Downturns in the States of Texas and Florida

As of December 31, ~~2014, 205~~2016, 244 of our ~~518~~659 self-storage facilities are located in the states of Texas and Florida. For the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, these facilities accounted for approximately ~~39%~~38% of store revenues. This concentration of business in Texas and Florida exposes us to potential losses resulting from a downturn in the economies of those states. If economic conditions in those states deteriorate, we may experience a reduction in existing and new business, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

When We Acquire Properties in New Markets, We Will Be Subject to Increased Operational Risks

We may acquire self-storage properties in markets where we have little or no operational experience. For example, in 2016 we acquired 22 self-storage properties in California, 17 self-storage properties in Nevada, one self-storage property in Utah, and one self-storage property in Wisconsin, all of which are states where we had not previously operated. When we enter into new markets, we will be subject to increased risks resulting from our lack of experience and infrastructure in these markets and may need to incur additional costs, both expected and unexpected, in order to develop our operating capabilities in these markets. These risks could materially and adversely affect us, including our growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in Taxation of Corporate Dividends May Adversely Affect the Value of Our Common Stock

The maximum marginal rate of tax payable by domestic noncorporate taxpayers on dividends received from a regular “C” corporation under current federal law generally is 20%, as opposed to higher ordinary income rates. The reduced tax rate, however, does not apply to distributions paid to domestic noncorporate taxpayers by a REIT on its stock, except for certain limited amounts. The earnings of a REIT that are distributed to its stockholders generally remain subject to less federal income taxation than earnings of a non-REIT “C” corporation that are distributed to its stockholders net of corporate-level income tax. However, the lower rate of taxation to dividends paid by regular “C” corporations could cause domestic noncorporate investors to view the stock of regular “C” corporations as more attractive relative to the stock of a REIT, because the dividends from regular “C” corporations continue to be taxed at a lower rate while distributions from REITs (other than distributions designated as capital gain dividends) are generally taxed at the same rate as other ordinary income for domestic noncorporate taxpayers.

We are heavily dependent on computer systems, telecommunications and the Internet to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business. Security breaches or a failure of such networks, systems or technology could adversely impact our business and customer relationships.

We are heavily dependent upon automated information technology and Internet commerce, with many of our new customers coming from the Internet or the telephone, and the nature of our business involves the receipt and retention of personal information about them. We centrally manage significant components of our operations with our computer systems, including our financial information, and we also rely extensively on third-party vendors to retain data, process transactions and provide other systems services. These systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer worms, viruses and other destructive or disruptive security breaches and catastrophic events.

As a result, our operations could be severely impacted by a natural disaster, terrorist attack or other circumstance that resulted in a significant outage of our systems or those of our third party providers, despite our use of back up and redundancy measures. Further, viruses and other related risks could negatively impact our information technology processes. We could also be subject to a “cyber-attack” or other data security breach which would penetrate our network security, resulting in misappropriation of our confidential information, including customer personal information. System disruptions and shutdowns could also result in additional costs to repair or replace such networks or information systems and possible legal liability, including government enforcement actions

and private litigation. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to move out of rented storage spaces. Such events could lead to lost future sales and adversely affect our results of operations.

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, we held ownership interests in, leased, and/or managed a total of ~~518~~659 Properties situated in ~~twenty-five~~twenty-nine states. Among our ~~518~~659 self-storage properties are 39 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture of which we are a 20% owner, 30 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture of which we are a 15% owner, 17and 26 properties that we manage and ~~in which~~ have no ownership ~~interest, and~~interest. We are also a 20% owner in an unconsolidated joint venture (191 III Life Storage Holdings LLC) which acquired four properties in January 2017 that ~~as of December 31, 2014,~~ we ~~leased.~~have managed since acquisition.

Our self-storage facilities offer inexpensive, easily accessible, enclosed storage space to residential and commercial users on a month-to-month basis. Most of our Properties are fenced and well lighted with automated access systems and surveillance cameras. A majority of the Properties are single-story, thereby providing customers with the convenience of direct vehicle access to their storage spaces. Our stores range in size from 18,000 to ~~181,000~~195,000 net rentable square feet, with an average of approximately ~~69,000~~70,000 net rentable square feet. The Properties generally are constructed of masonry or steel walls resting on concrete slabs and have standing seam metal, shingle, or tar and gravel roofs. All Properties have a property manager on-site during business hours. Generally, customers have access to their storage space up to 15 hours a day, and some customers are provided 24-hour access. Individual storage spaces are secured by a lock furnished by the customer to provide the customer with control of access to the space.

All of the Properties conduct business under the ~~user-friendly~~customer-friendly names Life Storage^® or Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®. At December 31, 2016, there remain stores in certain markets that continue to operate under the name Uncle Bob’s ~~Self-Storage ®.~~Self Storage^® and will continue to do so until our full transition to the Life Storage^® name is complete in the first half of 2017.

The following table provides certain information regarding the Properties in which we have an ownership interest, lease, and/or manage as of December 31, ~~2014:~~2016:


	Number of Stores at December 31, 2014		Square Feet		Number of Spaces		Percentage of Store Revenue			Number of Stores at December 31, 2016		Square Feet		Number of Spaces		Percentage of Store Revenue
Alabama		22		1,616,958		12,175		3.4	%		21		1,581,803		12,152		2.7	%
Arizona		10		668,582		5,870		1.6	%		12		798,474		7,077		1.6	%
California											22		2,040,278		17,981		3.7	%
Colorado		5		330,246		2,781		1.2	%		11		776,794		6,826		1.6	%
Connecticut		8		640,025		6,415		2.9	%		10		754,348		7,539		2.4	%
Florida		72		4,940,025		48,038		14.3	%		87		5,933,877		57,474		13.7	%
Georgia		30		2,128,323		18,063		5.5	%		30		2,091,516		17,870		4.5	%
Illinois		13		954,448		9,162		2.6	%		45		3,352,221		33,972		6.1	%
Kentucky		2		142,914		1,321		0.4	%		2		142,914		1,322		0.3	%
Louisiana		17		1,053,939		8,808		2.6	%		16		974,384		8,296		2.0	%
Maine		4		220,241		2,204		0.8	%		4		219,967		2,179		0.7	%
Maryland		3		138,729		1,618		0.6	%		3		138,639		1,618		0.4	%
Massachusetts		13		693,754		6,655		2.6	%		15		824,090		8,296		2.3	%
Mississippi		15		1,154,222		8,805		2.6	%		12		883,656		6,606		1.6	%
Missouri		15		928,165		8,271		2.3	%		14		912,735		8,206		2.1	%
Nevada											17		1,303,192		11,169		1.3	%
New Hampshire		4		260,236		2,342		0.8	%		10		725,777		6,226		1.5	%
New Jersey		29		2,093,768		21,963		7.6	%		29		2,089,217		21,867		6.6	%
New York		35		2,144,105		20,708		8.4	%		44		2,651,089		25,451		7.4	%
North Carolina		20		1,226,815		11,179		3.2	%		21		1,272,271		11,572		2.5	%
Ohio		23		1,575,216		13,124		4.0	%		24		1,630,497		13,691		3.0	%
Pennsylvania		9		606,776		5,164		1.5	%		11		692,196		5,984		1.5	%
Rhode Island		4		206,121		1,924		0.7	%		4		206,721		1,924		0.6	%
South Carolina		8		448,268		3,926		1.2	%		13		853,791		7,533		1.9	%
Tennessee		5		348,504		2,999		0.8	%		5		348,504		3,005		0.8	%
Texas		133		9,691,740		80,210		25.1	%		157		11,495,842		95,000		24.7	%
Utah											1		86,000		575		0.1	%
Virginia		19		1,296,341		12,065		3.3	%		17		1,265,058		11,535		2.3	%
Wisconsin											2		121,442		1,138		0.1	%

Total		518		35,508,461		315,790		100.0	%		659		46,167,293		414,084		100.0	%

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Properties had an average occupancy of ~~88.5%~~87.76% and an annualized rent per occupied square foot of ~~$12.40.~~

On or about August 25, 2014, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Burlington County. The action seeks to obtain declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief for a class of consumers based upon alleged violations by the Company of the New Jersey Truth in Customer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the New Jersey Insurance Producer Licensing Act. On October 17, 2014, the action was removed from the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Burlington County to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Company brought a motion to partially dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, and on July 16, 2015, the Company’s motion was granted in part and denied in part. On October 20, 2016, the complaint was amended to add a claim that the Company’s insurance program violates New Jersey consumer protection laws. The Company intends to vigorously defend the action, and the possibility of any adverse outcome cannot be determined at this time.

Our Common Stock iswas traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ~~“SSS.”~~“SSS” until August 15, 2016 at which time our symbol was change “LSI”. Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for our Common Stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years.


Quarter 2013	High		Low
Quarter 2015					High		Low
1st	$	67.44	$	60.29	$	97.76	$	87.40
2nd		71.55		62.11		94.84		85.95
3rd		76.53		64.69		99.32		85.69
4th		80.24		63.07		110.60		93.33

Quarter 2014	High		Low
Quarter 2016					High		Low
1st	$	76.45	$	62.66	$	118.18	$	98.80
2nd		79.29		72.88	$	117.81	$	98.93
3rd		79.93		73.59	$	107.71	$	86.45
4th		89.57		74.10	$	88.89	$	77.00

As of February 13, ~~2015,~~2017, there were approximately ~~752~~662 holders of record of our Common Stock. These figures do not include common shares held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders.

We have paid quarterly dividends to our shareholders since our inception. Reflected in the table below are the dividends paid in the last two years.

For federal income tax purposes, distributions to shareholders are treated as ordinary income, capital gain, return of capital or a combination thereof. Distributions to shareholders for ~~2014~~2016 represent ~~100%~~95% ordinary ~~income.~~income and 5% return of capital.

For each quarter in 2015 and 2016, the Operating Partnership paid a cash distribution per unit in an amount equal to the dividend paid on a share of common stock for such quarter.

In 2016, the Operating Partnership issued 90,477 OP Units with a fair value of $9.5 million to pay part of the consideration to acquire certain self-storage properties. The issuance of OP Units in connection with these acquisitions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, because it did not involve any public offering.

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, with respect to equity compensation plans under which shares of the Company’s Common Stock may be issued.


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (#)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance (#)		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (#)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance (#)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
2005 Award and Option Plan		82,606	$	45.75		543,229		77,206	$	45.49		—
2015 Award and Option Plan (2)								79,620	$	—		435,570
2009 Outside Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan		29,000	$	56.31		84,855		18,500	$	79.58		71,016
1995 Outside Directors’ Stock Option Plan		4,000	$	49.65		0
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (1)		45,505		N/A		2,050		20,513		N/A		23,625
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders:		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A

~~Unregistered Sale of Securities~~

(2)	Includes the maximum number of shares (79,620) that could be issued as part of 2015 and 2016 performance-based awards. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined at the end of the three year performance periods in 2018 and 2019. See note 9 of our consolidated financial statements.

During the quarterly period ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 2,000 shares of common stock as a result of the exercise of stock options issued under the Company’s 2009 Outside Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan. The Company received aggregate proceeds of $139,800 in connection with the exercise of the stock options. The issuance of such common stock was exempt from registration pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, among other reasons, by virtue of Section 4(2) as transactions not involving a public offering.

The following chart and line-graph presentation compares (i) the Company’s shareholder return on an indexed basis since December 31, ~~2009~~2011 with (ii) the S&P Stock Index and (iii) the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index.


	Dec. 31, 2009		Dec. 31, 2010		Dec. 31, 2011		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2011		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2015		Dec. 31, 2016
S&P		100.00		115.06		117.49		136.30		180.44		205.14		100.00		116.00		153.57		174.60		177.01		198.18
NAREIT		100.00		127.96		138.57		163.60		167.63		218.16		100.00		118.06		120.97		157.43		162.46		176.30
SSS		100.00		108.34		131.52		197.92		214.01		231.41
LSI														100.00		150.49		162.72		226.02		287.95		237.27

The foregoing item assumes $100.00 invested on December 31, ~~2009,~~2011, with dividends reinvested.

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on an historical consolidated basis for the Parent Company. The selected historical financial data as of and for the five-year period ended December 31, 2016 are derived from the Parent Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and their report thereon, are included herein. The other data presented below is not derived from the financial statements.

The following selected financial and operating information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Parent Company included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:


	At or For Year Ended December 31,															At or For Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010			2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
Operating Data
Operating revenues	$	326,080		$	273,507		$	234,082		$	200,860		$	181,874		$	462,608		$	366,602		$	326,080		$	273,507		$	234,082
Income from continuing operations		89,057			71,472			48,121			27,314			30,819			84,956			113,077			89,057			71,472			48,121
Income from discontinued operations (1)		—			3,123			7,520			4,215			11,722			—			—			—			3,123			7,520
Net income		89,057			74,595			55,641			31,529			42,541			84,956			113,077			89,057			74,595			55,641
Net income attributable to common shareholders		88,531			74,126			55,128			30,592			40,642			85,225			112,524			88,531			74,126			55,128
Income from continuing operations per common share attributable to common shareholders– diluted		2.67			2.26			1.61			0.95			1.05
Income from continuing operations per common share attributable to common shareholders – diluted																	1.96			3.16			2.67			2.26			1.61
Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic		2.68			2.37			1.88			1.11			1.48			1.97			3.18			2.68			2.37			1.88
Net income per common share attributable to common shareholders – diluted		2.67			2.36			1.87			1.10			1.48			1.96			3.16			2.67			2.36			1.87
Dividends declared per common share (2)		2.72			2.02			1.80			1.80			1.80			3.70			3.20			2.72			2.02			1.80

Balance Sheet Data
Investment in storage facilities at cost	$	2,177,983		$	1,864,637		$	1,742,354		$	1,525,283		$	1,349,927		$	4,243,308		$	2,491,702		$	2,177,983		$	1,864,637		$	1,742,354
Total assets		1,854,800			1,561,875			1,484,310			1,343,544			1,184,369			3,857,984			2,118,822			1,850,727			1,558,894			1,480,880
Total debt		801,127			626,254			684,251			625,423			488,954			1,653,552			827,643			797,054			623,273			680,821
Total liabilities		865,309			678,226			742,910			673,539			527,226			1,751,399			898,336			861,236			675,245			739,480

Other Data
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	146,068		$	120,646		$	98,762		$	79,897		$	73,671		$	225,550		$	186,198		$	146,068		$	120,646		$	98,762
Net cash used in investing activities		(334,993	)		(114,345	)		(175,664	)		(189,879	)		(32,605	)		(1,796,069	)		(328,689	)		(334,993	)		(114,345	)		(175,664	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		187,944			4,032			76,836			111,537			(46,010	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities																	1,587,184			140,968			187,944			(4,032	)		76,836

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on an historical consolidated basis for the Operating Partnership. The selected historical financial data as of and for the five-year period ended December 31, 2016 are derived from the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements for the years ending December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2016 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and their report thereon, are included herein. The other data presented below is not derived from the financial statements.

The following selected financial and operating information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Operating Partnership included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this document, the words “intends,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of competition from new self-storage facilities, which would cause rents and occupancy rates to decline; the Company’s ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired businesses into the Company’s existing business and operations; the Company’s ability to effectively compete in the industry in which it does business; the Company’s existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing refinancing or forcing refinancing of the indebtedness on terms that are not as favorable as the existing terms; interest rates may fluctuate, impacting costs associated with the Company’s outstanding floating rate debt; the Company’s ability to comply with debt covenants; any future ratings on the Company’s debt instruments; the regional concentration of the Company’s business may subject it to economic downturns in the states of Florida and Texas; the Company’s reliance on its call center; the Company’s cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of operating expenses, principal, interest and dividends; and tax law changes that may change the taxability of future income.

We believe we are the fifth largest operator of self-storage properties in the United States based on square feet owned and managed. All of our stores ~~are operated~~conduct business under the ~~user-friendly~~customer-friendly names Life Storage^® or Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®. At December 31, 2016, there remain stores in certain markets that continue to operate under the name ~~“Uncle~~Uncle Bob’s ~~Self-Storage”~~Self Storage^®. and will continue to do so until our full transition to the Life Storage^® name is complete in the first half of 2017.

other pertinent store information. This also provides us with raw data on historical and current pricing, move-in and move-out activity, specials and occupancies, etc. This data is then used within the advanced pricing analytics programs employed by our revenue management team.

We believe the supply and demand model in the self-storage industry is micro market specific in that a majority of our business comes from within a five mile radius of our stores. The recent economic conditions and the credit market environment ~~have~~had resulted in a decrease in new supply on a national basis infrom 2010-2015, but the ~~last five years. With the recent loosening~~out-performance of the ~~debt and equity markets, we~~sector compared to other real estate asset classes has drawn new capital to self-storage. The Company expects a modest, but noticeable, growth in new supply at least through 2018. We have seen capitalization rates on quality acquisitions in the top fifty major metropolitan markets (expected annual return on investment) ~~decrease from~~remain stable at approximately ~~5.75%~~4.50% to ~~5.00%~~5.50%.

~~We believe our industry weathered the most recent recession very well.~~ Although our industry experienced softness in 2008 through 2011, our same store sales showed positive increases save for 2009, when we showed a 3.1% decrease in same store revenue. That was the first time in recent history that we recorded negative same store sales. We feel our recent performance further supports the notion that the self-storage industry holds up well through recessions.

We believe our same-store move-ins in ~~2014~~2016 were lower than ~~2013~~2015 due to the fact that our stores ~~were~~had higher ~~occupied~~occupancy in ~~2014,~~2016, resulting in less space to rent. We believe the reduction in same store ~~move outs~~move-outs is a result of customers renting with us for longer ~~staying customers.~~periods.

~~We expect conditions in most of our markets to continue the recovery that we saw in 2011 through 2014.~~

We were able to maintain relatively flat expenses at the store operating level from 2009 through 2012, but did see above average increases in property taxes and insurance in 2013, and above average increases in property taxes in ~~2014.~~2014 through 2016. We do expect same store expense growth ~~to see pressure~~resulting from increases in wages, health costs, property insurance and property tax increases in ~~2015.~~2017. We believe the same store expense increases will be at manageable levels.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to carrying values of storage facilities, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. We base these estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Assigning purchase price to assets acquired: The purchase price of acquired storage facilities is assigned primarily to land, land improvements, building, equipment, and in-place customer leases based on the fair values of these assets as of the date of acquisition. We use significant unobservable inputs in our determination of the fair values of these assets. The determination of these inputs involves judgments and estimates that can vary for each individual property based on a number of factors specific to the properties and the functional, economic and other factors affecting each property. To determine the fair value of land, we use prices per acre derived from observed transactions involving comparable land in similar locations. To determine the fair value of buildings, equipment and improvements, we use financial projections and applicable discount rates to estimate the fair values of properties acquired, as well as current replacement cost estimates based on information derived from construction industry data by geographic region as adjusted for the age, condition, and economic obsolescence associated with these assets. The fair values of in-place customer leases is based on the rent that would be lost due to the amount of time required to replace existing customers which is based on our historical experience with market demand and turnover in our facilities.

Carrying value of storage facilities: We believe our judgment regarding the impairment of the carrying value of our storage facilities is a critical accounting policy. Our policy is to assess the carrying value of our storage facilities for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a storage facility may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances would include negative operating cash flow, significant declining revenue per storage facility, significant damage sustained from accidents or natural disasters, or an expectation that, more likely than not, a property will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously

estimated useful life. ~~Impairment~~When indicators of impairment exist, impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the storage facility, on a property by property basis. If the sum of the undiscounted cash ~~flow~~flows is less than the carrying ~~amount,~~value of the storage facility, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset group. If cash flow projections are inaccurate and in the future it is determined that storage facility carrying values

are not recoverable, impairment charges may be required at that time and could materially affect our operating results and financial position. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows could change based upon changes in market conditions, expected occupancy rates, etc. No assets had been determined to be impaired under this policy in ~~2014.~~2016.

Estimated useful lives of long-lived assets: We believe that the estimated lives used for our depreciable, long-lived assets is a critical accounting policy. We periodically evaluate the estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets to determine if any changes are warranted based upon various factors, including changes in the planned usage of the assets, customer demand, etc. Changes in estimated useful lives of these assets could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. In 2016, the Company changed the useful lives of existing Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® signs as a result of the change in the name of the Company’s storage facilities from Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® to Life Storage^® (See Note 1 to the financial statements) which required replacement of the existing signage. These changes resulted in an increase in depreciation expense of approximately $8.2 million in 2016 as depreciation was accelerated over the new useful lives. The Company estimates that this change will result in an additional increase in depreciation expense of approximately $1 million in 2017 as a result of the replacement of this existing Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® signage. Upon completion of the change, the carrying value of the Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® signage will be zero. We have not made any other significant changes to the estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets in the past and we do not have any current expectation of making significant changes in ~~2015.~~2017.

Consolidation and investment in joint ventures: We consolidate all wholly owned subsidiaries. Partially owned subsidiaries and joint ventures are consolidated when we control the entity or have the power to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of the entity. Investments in joint ventures that we do not control but over which we have significant influence are reported using the equity method. Under the equity method, our investment in joint ventures are stated at cost and adjusted for our share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings of real estate ventures is generally recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated real estate ventures.

Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recognized when earned pursuant to month-to-month leases for storage space. Promotional discounts are recognized as a reduction to rental income over the promotional period, which is generally during the first month of occupancy. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue.

Qualification as a REIT: We operate, and intend to continue to operate, as a REIT under the Code, but no assurance can be given that we will at all times so qualify. To the extent that we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, any requirement to pay federal income taxes could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” This ASU provides explicit guidance regarding the presentation in the statement of financial position of an unrecognized tax benefit when net operating losses or tax credit carryforwards exist. It is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted, and is applicableSee Note 2 to the ~~Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated~~ financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and disclosures of Components of an Entity”. Under this ASU, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. The ASU also requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. It is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2014 and the adoption is expected to significantly reduce the classification of property sales by the Company as discontinued operations.

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),” and requires an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has the option to apply the provisions of ASU 2014-09 either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period,” which requires a reporting entity to treat a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period as a performance condition.
ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be adopted either prospectively for share-based payment awards granted or modified on or after the effective date, or retrospectively, using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach would apply to share-based payment awards outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements on adoption, and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2014~~2016 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2013~~2015

We recorded rental revenues of ~~$302.0~~$428.1 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, an increase of ~~$48.7~~$89.7 million or ~~19.2%~~26.5% when compared to ~~2013~~2015 rental revenues of ~~$253.4~~$338.4 million. Of the increase in rental revenue, ~~$18.1~~$16.1 million resulted from a ~~7.3%~~5.0% increase in rental revenues at the ~~384~~417 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, ~~2013,~~2015, excluding the properties we sold in ~~2013~~2016 and ~~2014)~~2015, three properties purchased prior to January 1, 2015 that have not yet stabilized and three properties significantly impacted by flooding in 2016). The increase in same store rental revenues was a result of a ~~195~~50 basis point increase in average occupancy and a ~~4.4%~~4.3% increase in rental income per square foot. The remaining increase in rental revenue of ~~$30.6~~$73.6 million resulted from the revenues from the acquisition of ~~44 properties and the lease of four~~145 properties completed since January 1, 2015 (excluding the four properties purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool), slightly offset with the revenue decrease as a result of ~~two self storage~~eight self-storage properties sold in ~~2014.~~2016 and three self-storage properties sold in 2015. Other operating income, which includes merchandise sales, insurance ~~commissions,~~administrative fees, truck rentals, management fees and acquisition fees, increased by ~~$3.9~~$6.3 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 compared to ~~2013~~2015 primarily as a result of increased ~~commissions~~administrative fees earned on customer ~~insurance and an increase in management and acquisition fees.~~insurance.

Property operations and maintenance expenses increased ~~$8.4~~$21.4 million or ~~13.8%~~26.2% in ~~2014~~2016 compared to ~~2013.~~2015. The ~~384~~417 core properties considered in the same store pool experienced a ~~$2.0~~$1.0 million or ~~3.3%~~1.3% increase in operating expenses as a result of increases in payroll ~~utilities, credit card fees~~ and ~~maintenance~~internet marketing costs. The same store pool benefited from reduced utilities, snow removal costs, insurance and yellow page advertising expense. In addition to the same store operating expense increase, operating expenses increased ~~$6.4~~$20.4 million from the acquisition of ~~44 properties and the lease of four~~145 properties completed since January 1, ~~2013.~~2015 (excluding the four properties purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool), slightly offset with the operating expense decrease as a result of eight self-storage properties sold in 2016 and three self-storage properties sold in 2015. Real estate tax expense increased ~~$5.6~~$11.3 million or 30.9% in 2016 compared to 2015. The 417 core properties considered in the same store pool experienced a $1.9 million or 5.3% increase which is reflective of a net increase in property tax levies on those properties. In addition to the same store real estate expense increase, real estate taxes increased $9.4 million from the acquisition of 145 properties completed since January 1, 2015 (excluding the four properties purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool), slightly offset with the real estate tax expense decrease as a result of ~~a 6.3% increase~~eight self-storage properties sold in ~~property taxes on the 384 same store pool~~2016 and ~~the inclusion of taxes on the~~three self-storage properties ~~acquired or leased~~sold in ~~2014 and 2013.~~2015.

Our ~~2014~~2016 same store results consist of only those properties that were included in our consolidated results since January 1, ~~2013,~~2015, excluding the properties we sold in ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013.~~ 2015, three properties purchased prior to January 1, 2015 that have not yet stabilized and three properties significantly impacted by flooding in 2016. We believe that same store results is a meaningful measure to investors in evaluating our operating performance because, given the acquisitive nature of the industry, same store results provide information about the overall business after removing the results from those properties that were not consistent from year-to-year. Additionally, same store results are widely used in the real estate industry and the self-storage industry to measure performance. Same store results should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, consolidated results in accordance with GAAP.

The following table sets forth operating data for our ~~384~~417 same store properties. These results provide information relating to property operating changes without the effects of acquisition.


	Year ended December 31,				Percentage			Year ended December 31,				Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		Change			2016		2015		Change
Same store rental income	$	265,788	$	247,678		7.3	%	$	339,773	$	323,664		5.0	%
Same store other operating income		14,426		12,923		11.6	%		18,693		17,085		9.4	%

Total same store operating income		280,214		260,601		7.5	%		358,466		340,749		5.2	%

Payroll and benefits		25,178		24,505		2.7	%		29,754		28,843		3.2	%
Real estate taxes		27,289		25,671		6.3	%		36,707		34,847		5.3	%
Utilities		10,608		10,155		4.5	%		11,217		11,789		(4.9	%)
Repairs and maintenance		10,540		9,448		11.6	%		13,516		13,412		0.8	%
Office and other operating expenses		9,783		9,555		2.4	%		11,703		11,373		2.9	%
Insurance		3,987		4,303		-7.3	%		4,035		4,414		(8.6	%)
Advertising and yellow pages		1,391		1,528		-9.0	%		1,114		1,352		(17.6	%)
Internet marketing									6,409		5,557		15.3	%

Total same store operating expenses		88,776		85,165		4.2	%		114,455		111,587		2.6	%

Same store net operating income	$	191,438	$	175,436		9.1	%	$	244,011	$	229,162		6.5	%

Net operating income increased ~~$38.5~~$63.2 million or ~~20.7%~~25.5% as a result of a ~~9.1%~~6.5% increase in our same store net operating income and the acquisitions ~~and property leases~~ completed since January 1, ~~2013.~~2015 (excluding the four properties purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool).

Net operating income or “NOI” is a non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) financial measure that we define as total continuing revenues less continuing property operating expenses. NOI also can be calculated by adding back to net income: interest expense, impairment and casualty losses, operating lease expense, depreciation and amortization expense, acquisition related costs, general and administrative expense, and deducting from net income: income from discontinued operations, interest income, gain on sale of real estate, and equity in income of joint ventures. We believe that NOI is a meaningful measure ofto investors in evaluating our operating performance because we utilize NOI in making decisions with respect to capital allocations, in determining current property values, and in comparing period-to-period and market-to-market property operating results. Additionally, NOI is widely used in the real estate industry and the self-storage industry to measure the performance and value of real estate assets without regard to various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary depending on accounting methods and the book value of assets. NOI should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, such as total revenues, operating income and net income. There are material limitations to using a measure such as NOI, including the difficulty associated with comparing results among more than one company and the inability to analyze certain significant items, including depreciation and interest expense, that directly affect our net income. We compensate for these limitations by considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently as well as in connection with our analysis of net income.

The following table reconciles NOI generated by our self-storage facilities to our net income presented in the ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 consolidated financial statements.


	Year ended December 31,						Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2016			2015
Net operating income
Same store	$	191,438		$	175,436		$	244,011		$	229,162
Other stores and management fee income		32,782			10,259			67,333			18,962

Total net operating income		224,220			185,695			311,344			248,124

General and administrative		(40,792	)		(34,939	)		(43,103	)		(38,659	)
Acquisition related costs		(7,359	)		(3,129	)		(29,542	)		(2,991	)
Write-off of acquired property deposits								(1,783	)		—
Operating leases of storage facilities		(7,987	)		(1,331	)		—			(683	)
Depreciation and amortization		(51,749	)		(45,233	)		(117,081	)		(58,506	)
Interest expense		(34,578	)		(32,000	)		(54,504	)		(37,124	)
Interest income		40			40			67			5
Gain (loss) on sale of storage facilities								15,270			(494	)
Gain on sale of real estate		5,176			421			623			—
Equity in income of joint ventures		2,086			1,948			3,665			3,405
Income from discontinued operations		—			3,123

Net income	$	89,057		$	74,595		$	84,956		$	113,077

General and administrative expenses increased ~~$5.9~~$4.4 million or ~~16.8%~~11.5% from ~~2013~~2015 to ~~2014.~~2016. The key drivers of the increase were $0.9 million in expenses recorded in 2016 related to the Company’s name change, and a ~~$3.6~~$1.7 million increase in ~~salaries and performance incentives, and a $0.8 million~~professional fees mainly stemming from an increase in ~~internet advertising.~~accounting fees related to the acquisition of LifeStorage, LP and an increase in legal fees related to the lawsuit in New Jersey. The remaining ~~$1.5~~$1.8 million increase is the result of various other administrative costs, including increased travel expenses and software charges, related to managing the increased number of stores in our portfolio as ~~compared to 2013.~~a result of the LifeStorage, LP acquisition and other smaller acquisitions in 2016.

Acquisition related costs were ~~$7.4~~$29.5 million in ~~2014~~2016 as a result of the acquisition of ~~33 stores.~~122 stores, including the acquisition of LifeStorage, LP. Acquisition related costs for ~~2013~~2015 were ~~$3.1~~$3.0 million as a result of the acquisition of ~~11 stores in 2013.~~27 stores.

The ~~Operating leases of~~operating lease expense for storage facilities in ~~2013 and 2014 relate~~2015 relates to ~~lease agreements entered~~leases which commenced in November 2013 with respect to four ~~self storage~~self-storage facilities in New York (2) and Connecticut (2). Such leases had annual lease payments of $6 million with a provision for 4% annual increases, and an exclusive option to purchase the facilities for $120 million. We ~~exercised~~completed the purchase ~~option and acquired~~of these four ~~stores in~~facilities on February ~~2015.~~2, 2015, thus eliminating the lease payments thereafter.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased to ~~$51.7~~$117.1 million in ~~2014~~2016 from ~~$45.2~~$58.5 million in ~~2013,~~2015, primarily as a result of amortization and depreciation onrelated to the properties acquired in ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2014.~~2016 and accelerated depreciation on existing signage that is being replaced as a result of the change in name of the Company’s storage facilities from Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® to Life Storage^®.

Interest expense increased from ~~$32.0~~$37.1 million in ~~2013~~2015 to ~~$34.6~~$54.5 million in ~~2014.~~2016. The increase was ~~mainly~~primarily due to interest on bridge loan financing entered into to facilitate the ~~new $175~~LifeStorage, LP acquisition as well as interest on the $600 million ~~10 year~~3.5% senior notes issued in June 2016 and the $200 million 3.67% term ~~unsecured note~~loan entered into in ~~April 2014,~~July 2016, partially offset by reduced ~~rates~~interest costs as a result of the payoff of the $150 million 6.38% term loan in April 2016 with a draw on our ~~bank revolving~~line of credit ~~facility and term notes. In addition, in September 2013 we replaced a maturing fixed rate term note with a bank term loan with~~which carries a lower interest rate.

During ~~2014~~2016, we sold ~~two~~eight non-strategic storage facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (1), Mississippi (1), Texas (1), and Virginia (4) for net proceeds of approximately ~~$11.0~~$34.1 million, resulting in a $15.3 million gain on ~~the sale~~sale. During 2015, we sold three non-strategic storage facilities purchased during 2014 and 2015 in Missouri and South Carolina for net proceeds of ~~real estate~~approximately $4.6 million, resulting in a loss of ~~$5.2~~approximately $0.5 million. ~~Since the two sales occurred subsequent to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2014-08, these sales~~These dispositions were not classified as discontinued operations since they did not meet the criteria for such classification under
ASU 2014-08 guidance. ~~During 2013, we sold our equity interest and mortgage note in a formerly consolidated joint venture for $4.4 million resulting in a gain on the sale of $0.4 million.~~

~~In the 4~~^th quarter of 2013, we sold four non-strategic facilities in Ohio, Florida (2), and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately 2.4 million. In July and August of 2012, the Company sold 17 non-strategic storage facilities in Maryland (1), Michigan (4) and Texas (12) for net proceeds of approximately $47.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $4.5 million. The 2013 and 2012 operations of these facilities are reported in income from discontinued operations for all periods presented.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2013~~2015 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2012~~2014

We recorded rental revenues of ~~$253.4~~$338.4 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2015, an increase of ~~$35.5~~$36.4 million or ~~16.3%~~12.0% when compared to ~~2012~~2014 rental revenues of ~~$217.9~~$302.0 million. Of the increase in rental revenue, ~~$15.8~~$16.9 million resulted from a ~~7.4%~~5.9% increase in rental revenues at the ~~358~~399 core properties considered in same store sales (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations ~~since January 1, 2012,~~in 2014 and 2015, excluding the properties we sold in ~~2012~~2015 and ~~2013)~~2014). The increase in same store rental revenues was a result of a ~~340~~110 basis point increase in average occupancy and a ~~2.6%~~4.3% increase in rental income per square foot. The remaining increase in rental revenue of ~~$19.7~~$19.5 million resulted from the revenues from the acquisition of 3956 properties completed in 2014 and 2015 (excluding the ~~lease of~~ four properties ~~completed from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013.~~purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool), slightly offset with a revenue decrease as a result of three self-storage properties sold in 2015. Other operating income, which includes merchandise sales, insurance ~~commissions,~~administrative fees, truck rentals, management fees and acquisition fees, increased by ~~$3.9~~$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2015 compared to ~~2012~~2014 primarily as a result of increased ~~commissions~~administrative fees earned on customer ~~insurance.~~insurance and an increase in management fees.

Property operations and maintenance expenses increased ~~$6.2~~$6.6 million or ~~11.2%~~8.7% in ~~2013~~2015 compared to ~~2012.~~2014. The ~~358~~399 core properties considered in the same store pool experienced a ~~$1.1~~$1.3 million or ~~2.0%~~1.9% increase in operating expenses as a result of increases in payroll ~~credit card fees~~ and ~~snow removal~~maintenance costs. The same store pool benefited from reduced utilities, insurance and yellow page advertising expense. In addition to the same store operating expense increase, operating expenses increased ~~$5.1~~$5.3 million from the acquisition of 3956 properties ~~and~~completed since January 1, 2014 (excluding the ~~lease of~~ four properties ~~completed from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013.~~purchased in 2015 that had been leased since November 2013 and are included in the same store pool). Real estate tax expense increased ~~$4.4~~$4.5 million as a result of a ~~7.4%~~5.2% increase in property taxes on the ~~358~~399 same store pool and the inclusion of taxes on the properties acquired or leased in ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012.~~2014.

Our ~~2013~~2015 same store results consist of only those properties that were included in our consolidated results since January 1, ~~2012,~~2014, excluding the properties we sold in ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012.~~2014. The following table sets forth operating data for our ~~358~~399 same store properties. These results provide information relating to property operating changes without the effects of acquisition.


	Year ended December 31,				Percentage			Year ended December 31,				Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		Change			2015		2014		Change
Same store rental income	$	228,357	$	212,596		7.4	%	$	301,525	$	284,613		5.9	%
Same store other operating income		12,284		10,745		14.3	%		16,406		14,791		10.9	%

Total same store operating income		240,641		223,341		7.7	%		317,931		299,404		6.2	%

Payroll and benefits		22,521		22,277		1.1	%		27,469		26,518		3.6	%
Real estate taxes		22,999		21,417		7.4	%		31,593		30,041		5.2	%
Utilities		9,262		9,167		1.0	%		10,925		11,389		(4.1	%)
Repairs and maintenance		8,734		8,488		2.9	%		12,400		11,256		10.2	%
Office and other operating expenses		8,776		8,339		5.2	%		10,294		10,390		(0.9	%)
Insurance		3,819		3,435		11.2	%		4,059		4,152		(2.2	%)
Advertising and yellow pages		1,411		1,734		-18.6	%		1,297		1,441		(10.0	%)
Internet marketing									5,319		5,307		0.2	%

Total same store operating expenses		77,522		74,857		3.6	%		103,356		100,494		2.8	%

Same store net operating income	$	163,119	$	148,484		9.9	%	$	214,575	$	198,910		7.9	%

Net operating income increased ~~$28.9~~$29.5 million or ~~18.4%~~13.5% as a result of a ~~9.9%~~7.9% increase in our same store net operating income and the acquisitions completed in 2014 and ~~property leases completed since January 1, 2012.~~2015.

Internet advertising expense, ~~impairment and casualty losses, operating lease expense, depreciation and amortization expense, acquisition related costs,~~which had been included in the general and administrative expense line in the Company’s 2014 financial statements, was reclassified to property operations and ~~deducting~~

~~from net income: income from discontinued~~maintenance expense in 2015 to conform to the then current year presentation. The Company believes the classification of internet advertising expenses as property operations ~~interest income, gain on sale~~and maintenance expense is more consistent with industry trends. As a result of ~~real estate,~~this reclassification, for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s financial statements show an increase in property operations and ~~equity~~maintenance expense and a reduction of general and administrative expenses of $5,570 (dollars in ~~income of joint ventures. We believe that NOI is a meaningful measure of operating performance because we utilize NOI in making decisions with respect~~thousands) as compared to capital allocations, in determining current property values, and in comparing period-to-period and market-to-market property operating results. NOI should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performancethe amounts originally reported in ~~accordance with GAAP, such as total revenues, operating income and net income. There are material limitations to using a measure such as NOI, including~~ the ~~difficulty associated with comparing results among more than one company and the inability to analyze certain significant items, including depreciation and interest expense,~~Company’s 2014 financial statements for that directly affect our net income. We compensate for these limitations by considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently as well as in connection with our analysis of net income. period.

The following table reconciles NOI generated by our self-storage facilities to our net income presented in the ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012~~2014 consolidated financial statements.


	Year ended December 31,						Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			2015			2014
Net operating income
Same store	$	163,119		$	148,484		$	214,575		$	198,910
Other stores and management fee income		22,576			8,359			33,549			19,740

Total net operating income		185,695			156,843			248,124			218,650

General and administrative		(34,939	)		(32,313	)		(38,659	)		(35,222	)
Acquisition related costs		(3,129	)		(4,328	)		(2,991	)		(7,359	)
Operating leases of storage facilities		(1,331	)		—			(683	)		(7,987	)
Depreciation and amortization		(45,233	)		(40,542	)		(58,506	)		(51,749	)
Interest expense		(32,000	)		(33,166	)		(37,124	)		(34,578	)
Interest income		40			4			5			40
Gain on sale of real estate		421			687
(Loss) gain on sale of real estate								(494	)		5,176
Equity in income of joint ventures		1,948			936			3,405			2,086
Income from discontinued operations		3,123			7,520

Net income	$	74,595		$	55,641		$	113,077		$	89,057

General and administrative expenses increased ~~$2.6~~$3.4 million or ~~8.1%~~9.8% from ~~2012~~2014 to ~~2013.~~2015. The key drivers of the increase were a $1.6 million increase in salaries and performance incentives, and a $1.0 million increase in ~~internet advertising.~~professional fees mainly stemming from an increase in legal fees related to the lawsuit in New Jersey. The remaining $0.8 million increase is the result of various other administrative costs related to managing the increased number of stores in our portfolio as compared to 2014.

Acquisition related costs ~~decreased by $1.2~~were $3.0 million in 2015 as a result of the acquisition of 27 stores. Acquisition related costs for 2014 were $7.4 million as a result of the ~~$94.9~~acquisition of 33 stores in 2014, and included a $1.3 million ~~of stores acquired or leased in 2013 compared to~~loan defeasance cost paid by the ~~$189.1 million of stores acquired in 2012.~~Company.

The ~~Operating leases of~~operating lease expense for storage facilities in ~~2013 relate~~the 2015 and 2014 periods relates to ~~lease agreements entered~~leases which commenced in November 2013 with respect to four ~~self storage~~self-storage facilities in New York (2) and Connecticut (2). Such leases had annual lease payments of $6 million with a provision for 4% annual increases, and an exclusive option to purchase the facilities for $120 million. We ~~exercised~~completed the purchase ~~option and acquired~~of these four ~~stores in~~facilities on February ~~2015.~~2, 2015, which eliminated the lease payment at that time.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased to ~~$45.2~~$58.5 million in ~~2013~~2015 from ~~$40.5~~$51.8 million in ~~2012,~~2014, primarily as a result of depreciation on the properties acquired in ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2013.~~2015.

Interest expense ~~decreased~~increased from ~~$33.2~~$34.6 million in ~~2012~~2014 to ~~$32.0~~$37.1 million in ~~2013.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~mainly~~ due to the ~~refinancing of our bank~~additional $175 million term note borrowings in April 2014 and additional line of credit ~~and term notes~~borrowings in ~~June 2013~~2015 which ~~reduced~~were used to fund a portion of our ~~interest rate on those obligations. In addition, in September 2013 we replaced a maturing fixed rate term note with a bank term loan with a lower interest rate.~~acquisitions.

During ~~2013,~~2015, we sold ~~our equity interest~~three non-strategic storage facilities purchased during 2014 and ~~mortgage note~~2015 in Missouri and South Carolina for net proceeds of approximately $4.6 million, resulting in a ~~formerly consolidated joint venture~~loss of approximately $0.5 million. During 2014, we sold two non-strategic facilities in Texas for ~~$4.4~~net proceeds of approximately $11.0 million resulting in a gain on the sale of ~~$0.4~~real estate of $5.2 million. ~~During 2012, we sold a portion~~Since the 2014 and 2015 sales occurred subsequent to the Company’s adoption of ~~one of our facilities and a parcel of land for net proceeds of $3.3 million resulting in a gain of $0.7 million.~~

~~In the 4~~^th quarter of 2013, we sold four non-strategic facilities in Ohio, Florida (2), and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately 2.4 million. In July and August of 2012, the Company sold 17 non-strategic storage facilities in Maryland (1), Michigan (4) and Texas (12) for net proceeds of approximately $47.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $4.5 million. The 2013 and 2012 operations ofASU 2014-08, these ~~facilities are reported in income from~~sales were not classified as discontinued operations since they did not meet the criteria for ~~all periods presented.~~such classification under ASU 2014-08 guidance.

We believe that Funds from Operations (“FFO”) provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net earnings and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. FFO adds back historical cost depreciation, which assumes the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably in the future. In fact, real estate asset values increase or decrease with market conditions. Consequently, we believe FFO is a useful supplemental measure in evaluating our operating performance by disregarding (or adding back) historical cost depreciation.

FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) as net income available to common shareholders computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding gains or losses on sales of properties, plus impairment of real estate assets, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance FFO should be compared with our reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

In October and November of 2011, NAREIT issued guidance for reporting FFO that reaffirmed NAREIT’s view that impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate should be excluded from the computation of FFO. This view is based on the fact that impairment write-downs are akin to and effectively reflect the early recognition of losses on prospective sales of depreciable property or represent adjustments of previously charged depreciation. Since depreciation of real estate and gains/losses from sales are excluded from FFO, it is NAREIT’s view that it is consistent and appropriate for write-downs of depreciable real estate to also be excluded. Our calculation of FFO excludes impairment write-downs of investments in storage facilities.

Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions.

Our line of credit and term notes require us to meet certain financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net worth, limitations on additional indebtedness, and limitations on dividend payouts. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. The most sensitive covenant is the leverage ratio covenant contained in certain of our term note agreements. This covenant limits our total consolidated liabilities to 55% of our gross asset value. At December 31, 2014, our leverage ratio as defined in the agreements was approximately 37.7%. The agreements define total consolidated liabilities to include the liabilities of the Company plus our share of liabilities of unconsolidated joint ventures. The agreements also define a prescribed formula for determining gross asset value which incorporates the use of a 9.25% capitalization rate applied to annualized earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and other items (“Adjusted EBITDA”) as defined in the agreements. In the event that the Company violates its debt covenants in the future, the amounts due under the agreements could be callable by the lenders and could adversely affect our credit rating requiring us to pay higher interest and other debt-related costs. We believe that if operating results remain consistent with historical levels and levels of other debt and liabilities remain consistent with amounts outstanding at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the entire availability under our line of credit could be drawn without violating our debt covenants.

Our ability to retain cash flow is limited because we operate as a REIT. In order to maintain our REIT status, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow must be used to pay dividends to our shareholders. We believe that our internally generated net cash provided by operating activities and the availability on our line of credit will be sufficient to fund ongoing operations, capital improvements, dividends and debt service ~~requirements through April 2016, at which time $150 million of term notes mature.~~requirements.

Cash flows from operating activities were ~~$146.1~~$225.6 million, ~~$120.6~~$186.2 million, and ~~$98.8~~$146.1 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, respectively. The ~~increase~~increases in operating cash flows from ~~2013~~2015 to ~~2014~~2016 and from ~~2012~~2014 to ~~2013 was~~2015 were primarily due to an increase in net ~~income.~~income as adjusted for non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses during these periods.

Cash used in investing activities was ~~$335.0~~$1,796.1 million, ~~$114.3~~$328.7 million, and ~~$175.7~~$335.0 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012~~2014 respectively. The increase in cash used from ~~2013~~2015 to ~~2014~~2016 was primarily due to $281.7 million spent in 2014 to purchase 33 storage facilities compared to the $94.8 million spent in 2013 on the acquisition of 11 storage facilities. In addition, in 2014 we invested $28.6 million in an unconsolidated joint venture to fund our sharea result of the acquisition of ~~14 stores. In 2012 we spent $186.9 million to purchase 28 storage facilities. Also,~~LifeStorage, LP and other acquisitions made in ~~2012 we received $47.7 million from~~2016, partially offset by increased proceeds on the sale of storage facilities in 2016. The decrease in cash used in investing activities from 2014 to 2015 was a result of lower investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in 2015 as compared to ~~the $11.7 million we received in 2013 and the $11.2 million received in~~ 2014.

Cash provided by financing activities was $1,587.2 million in 2016 compared to $141.0 million in 2015. On January 20, 2016, the Company completed the public offering of 2,645,000 shares of its common stock at $105.75 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $269.7 million. The Company used the net proceeds from this offering to repay a portion of the indebtedness then outstanding on the Company’s unsecured line of credit which had been used to fund acquisitions in the first quarter of 2016. Also on May 25, 2016, the Company completed the public offering of 6,900,000 shares of its common stock at $100.00 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $665.4 million. The Company initially used the net proceeds from this offering to repay the indebtedness then outstanding on the Company’s unsecured line of credit. The remaining proceeds from the May offering, the proceeds from the Company’s June 2016 unsecured senior notes offering, and draws on the Company’s revolving line of credit were used to fund the purchase of LifeStorage, LP in July 2016 for approximately $1.3 billion. Cash provided by financing activities was $141.0 million in 2015 compared to $187.9 million in 2014. The decrease from 2014 ~~compared~~ to ~~cash~~2015 was a result of a $23.0 million increase in dividends paid and a reduction in debt from 2014 to 2015. In 2015 we used ~~in financing activities of $4.0~~$225.7 million in ~~2013. In 2014 we used the $112.7 million~~ net proceeds from the sale of common stock and $175.0 million in term note proceeds to fund property acquisitions. In 2013, we used the $119.5 million net proceeds from the sale of common stock to paydown our line of credit and to fund a portion of the property acquisitions. In 2012 we realized $78.9 million from the sale of our common stock through our at the market equity offering and stock option plans, and $59.0$30.0 million in net proceeds from draws on our line of credit to fund property acquisitions. In 2014 we used $112.7 million in net proceeds from the sale of common stock and $175.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of a term note to fund property acquisitions.

On March 3, 2015, the Company completed the public offering of 1,380,000 shares of its common stock at $90.40 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $119.5 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay a portion of ~~our acquisitions and capital improvements.~~

~~On December 10, 2014,~~ the Company amended its existing unsecured credit agreement. As part of the amended agreement, the Company increased its revolving credit limit from $175 million to $300 million. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, 2014 the margin is 1.30%), and requires a facility fee based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, 2014 the facility fee is 0.20%). The amended agreement also reduced the interest rate on the $325 million unsecured term note maturing June 4, 2020, with the term note bearing interest at LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, 2014 the margin is 1.40%). The interest rate at December 31, 2014 on the Company’s line of credit was approximately 1.46% (1.67% at December 31, 2013). At December 31, 2014, there was $250.3 million available on the unsecured line of credit net of $49.0 million in outstanding borrowings and outstanding letters of credit of $0.7 million. The revolving line of credit has a maturity date of December 10, 2019. The amended agreement also provides for an increase in the revolving credit facility and the bank term notes at the Company’s request to an aggregate amount up to $850 million.

On April 8, 2014, the Company entered into a $175 million term note maturing April 2024 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.533%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 6.283% if the Company is not rated by at least one rating agency or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to repay the $115 millionindebtedness outstanding on the Company’s ~~line of credit at April 8, 2014, with the excess proceeds used for acquisitions.~~

~~In February 2015, the Company acquired five storage facilities for a combined purchase price of $126.8 million. These acquisitions were funded with draws on the Company’s~~unsecured line of credit.

On August 5, 2011, the Company entered into a $100 million term note maturing August 2021 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 5.54%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 7.29% if the notes are not rated by at least one rating agency, the credit rating on the notes is downgraded or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to fund acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.

The Company also maintains a $150 million unsecured term note maturing in April 2016 bearing interest at 6.38%. The interest rate on the $150 million unsecured term note increases to 8.13% if the notes are not rated by at least one rating agency, the credit rating on the notes is downgraded or the Company’s credit rating is downgraded.

~~Our line of credit facility and term notes have an investment grade rating from Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings (BBB-).~~

In addition to the unsecured financing mentioned above, our consolidated financial statements also include $2.1 million of mortgages payable at December 31, 2014, that are secured by a storage facility.

trading price of the Company’s common stock, and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for the Company. The Company expects to continue to offer, sell, and issue shares of common stock under the Equity Program from time to time based on various factors and conditions, although the Company is under no obligation to sell any shares under the Equity Program.

During ~~2014,~~2016, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock under the equity program. During 2015, the Company issued ~~924,403~~949,911 shares of common stock under the Equity Program at a weighted average issue price of ~~$79.77~~$96.80 per share, generating net proceeds of ~~$72.8 million after deducting $0.9 million~~$90.6 million. During 2014, we issued 924,403 shares under the Equity Program and 359,102 shares under our previous Equity Program for net proceeds of ~~sales commissions paid to Piper, HSBC and BB&T.~~approximately $99.2 million. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company ~~had $151.3~~has $59.3 million ~~available~~availability for issuance of shares under the ~~Equity Program.~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued 359,102 shares of common stock under a previous equity program at a weighted average issue price of $74.32 per share, generating net proceeds of $26.4 million after deducting $0.3 million of sales commissions payable to SunTrust.

During 2013, the Company issued 1,667,819 shares under its previously available equity offering program at a weighted average issue price of $65.66 per share, generating net proceeds of $107.8 million after deducting $0.5 million of sales commissions payable to SunTrust, $0.5 million to Wells Fargo, and $0.5 million to Jefferies. In addition to sales commissions, the Company incurred expenses of $0.2 million in connection with thecurrent Equity Program during 2013. The Company used the proceeds from the Equity Program to reduce the outstanding balance under the Company’s revolving line of credit and to fund the acquisition of 11 storage facilities.

During 2012, the Company issued 1,391,425 shares under its previously available equity offering program with Wells Fargo at a weighted average issue price of $55.20 per share, generating net proceeds of $75.3 million after deducting $1.5 million of sales commissions payable to Wells Fargo. In addition to sales commissions paid to Wells Fargo, the Company incurred expenses of $58,000which expires in ~~connection with this equity offering program during 2012. The Company used the proceeds from this offering to reduce the outstanding balance under the Company’s revolving line of credit.~~May 2017.

We implemented a Dividend Reinvestment Plan in March 2013. We issued ~~171,854~~133,666 and ~~68,957~~151,246 shares under the plan in ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, respectively.

During ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, we did not acquire any shares of our common stock via the Share Repurchase Program authorized by the Board of Directors. From the inception of the Share Repurchase Program through December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, we have reacquired a total of 1,171,886 shares pursuant to this program. From time to time, subject to market price and certain loan covenants, we may reacquire additional shares.

In January 2016, the Company exercised the expansion feature of its existing amended unsecured credit agreement and increased the revolving credit limit from $300 million to $500 million. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, 2016 the margin is 1.10%), and requires a 0.15% facility fee. The Company’s unsecured credit agreement also includes a $325 million unsecured term note maturing June 4, 2020, with the term note bearing interest at LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, 2016 the margin is 1.15%). The interest rate at December 31, 2016 on the Company’s line of credit was approximately 1.79% (1.72% at December 31, 2015). At December 31, 2016, there was $247 million available on the unsecured line of credit. The revolving line of credit has a maturity date of December 10, 2019.

The Company had maintained a $150 million unsecured term note that matured on April 26, 2016 bearing interest at 6.38%. The Company used a draw on the line of credit to pay off the balance of this note on April 26, 2016.

On April 8, 2014, the Company entered into a $175 million term note maturing April 2024 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.533%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 6.283% if the Company is not rated by at least one rating agency or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to repay the $115 million outstanding on the Company’s line of credit at April 8, 2014, with the excess proceeds used for acquisitions.

In 2011, the Company entered into a $100 million term note maturing August 5, 2021 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 5.54%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 7.29% if the notes are not rated by at least one rating agency, the credit rating on the notes is downgraded or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to fund acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.

The line of credit and term notes require the Company to meet certain financial covenants, measured on a quarterly basis, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and limitations on dividend payouts. At December 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.

We believe that if operating results remain consistent with historical levels and levels of other debt and liabilities remain consistent with amounts outstanding at December 31, 2016 the entire availability on the line of credit could be drawn without violating our debt covenants.

The Company’s fixed rate term notes contain a provision that allows for the noteholders to call the debt upon a change of control of the Company at an amount that includes a make whole premium based on rates in effect on the date of the change of control.

Our line of credit facility and term notes have an investment grade rating from Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s (Baa2).

In addition to the unsecured financing mentioned above, our consolidated financial statements also include $13.0 million of mortgages payable at December 31, 2016, that are secured by four storage facilities.

Future acquisitions, our expansion and enhancement program, and share repurchases are expected to be funded with draws on our line of credit, issuance of common and preferred stock, the issuance of unsecured term notes, sale of properties, and private placement solicitation of joint venture equity. Should the capital markets deteriorate, we may have to curtail acquisitions, our expansion and enhancement program, and share ~~repurchases as we approach April 2016, when certain term notes mature.~~repurchases.


	Payments due by period (in thousands)										Payments due by period (in thousands)
Contractual obligations	Total		2015		2016-2017		2018-2019		2020 and thereafter		Total		2017		2018-2019		2020-2021		2022 and thereafter
Line of credit	$	49,000		—		—	$	49,000		—	$	253,000	$	—	$	253,000	$	—	$	—
Term notes		750,000		—	$	150,000		—	$	600,000		1,400,000		—		—		425,000		975,000
Mortgages payable		2,127	$	134		293		330		1,370		13,027		353		765		3,534		8,375
Interest payments		156,688		29,560		42,348		39,811		44,969		407,534		53,970		107,442		84,928		161,194
Interest rate swap payments		13,341		5,501		2,825		4,364		651		13,015		4,033		7,785		1,197		—
Standby letter of credit		652		652		—		—		—
Land lease		802		53		106		107		536
Land leases												9,669		566		1,133		1,137		6,833
Expansion and enhancement contracts		10,142		10,142		—		—		—		11,552		11,552		—		—		—
Building leases		8,740		1,481		1,934		1,947		3,378		15,318		1,866		3,426		3,429		6,597
Self storage facility acquisitions		143,680		143,680		—		—		—
Self-storage facility acquisitions												67,025		67,025		—		—		—
Contribution to joint venture for acquisitions under contract												21,900		21,900		—		—		—

Total	$	1,135,172	$	191,203	$	197,506	$	95,559	$	650,904	$	2,212,040	$	161,265	$	373,551	$	519,225	$	1,157,999

Interest payments include actual interest on fixed rate debt and estimated interest for floating-rate debt based on December 31, ~~2014~~2016 rates. Interest rate swap payments include estimated net settlements of swap liabilities based on forecasted variable rates.

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company was under contract to acquire ~~seven~~five self-storage facilities for cash consideration of approximately ~~$143.7 million. Five~~$67.0 million (net of property deposits of $3.7 million). One of the properties ~~were~~was acquired in February ~~2015~~2017 from an unrelated party for ~~$126.8~~$9.8 million. The purchase of the remaining facilities by the Company is subject to customary conditions to closing, and there is no assurance that these facilities will be acquired.

In 2016, we acquired 122 self-storage facilities comprising 9.4 million square feet in Arizona (1), California (22), Colorado (6), Connecticut (2), Florida (11), Illinois (25), Massachusetts (1), Mississippi (1), New Hampshire (5), Nevada (17), New York (4), Pennsylvania (1), South Carolina (1), Texas (23), Utah (1), and Wisconsin (1) for a total purchase price of $1,783.9 million. Based on the trailing financial information of the entities from which the properties were acquired, the weighted average capitalization rate was 3.6% on these purchases and ranged from 0% on recently constructed facilities to 6.7% on mature facilities. In 2015, we acquired 27 self-storage facilities comprising 2.0 million square feet in Arizona (1), Connecticut (2), Florida (6), Illinois (2), Massachusetts (1), New York (6), North Carolina (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Carolina (6) and Texas (1) for a total purchase price of $281.2 million. Based on the trailing financial information of the entities from which the properties were acquired, the weighted average capitalization rate was 5.3% on these purchases and ranged from 0% on recently constructed facilities to 6.4% on mature facilities. Four facilities acquired in Connecticut and New York in 2015 had been leased by the Company since November 1, 2013 and the operating results of these four facilities have been included in the Company’s operations since that date. In 2014, we acquired 33 ~~self storage~~self-storage facilities comprising 2.4 million square feet in Florida (4), Georgia (1), Illinois (3), Louisiana (1), Maine (2), Missouri (7), New Jersey (6), New York (1), Texas (6), Tennessee (1), and Virginia (1) for a total purchase price of $291.9 million. Based on the trailing ~~financials~~financial information of the entities from which the properties were acquired, the weighted average capitalization rate was 5.5% on these purchases and ranged from 0%, on ~~a newly~~recently constructed ~~store,~~facilities to 7.4%. In 2013, we acquired 11 self storage facilities comprising 0.6 million square feet in Colorado (1), Connecticut (1), Florida (1), Massachusetts (1), New Jersey (2), New York (3), and Texas (2) for a total purchase price of $94.9 million. Based on the trailing financials of the entities from which the properties were acquired, the weighted average capitalization rate was 4.8% on these purchases and ranged from 2.3% to 6.5%. In addition to the properties acquired, in November 2013 the Company entered into lease agreements with respect to four self storage facilities in New York (2) and Connecticut (2). Such leases had annual lease payments of $6 million with a provision for 4% annual increases, and an exclusive option to purchase the facilities for $120 million. We exercised our purchase option in November 2014 and completed the acquisition of these four properties in February 2015. In 2012, we acquired 28 self storage facilities comprising 2.2 million square feet in Arizona (1), Florida (8), Georgia (5), Illinois (9), North Carolina (1), Texas (3), and Virginia (1) for a total purchase price of $189.1 million.mature facilities.

Our external growth strategy is to increase the number of facilities we own by acquiring suitable facilities in markets in which we already have operations, or to expand into new markets by acquiring several facilities at once in those new markets. We are actively pursuing acquisitions in ~~2015~~2017 and at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 we had ~~seven~~five properties under contract to be purchased for ~~$143.7~~$67.0 million. ~~Five~~One of the properties ~~were~~was acquired in February ~~2015.~~2017.

In ~~2014,~~2016, we added ~~272,000~~343,000 square feet to existing Properties and converted ~~9,000~~55,000 square feet to premium storage for a total cost of approximately ~~$18.3~~$22.4 million. During 2013, we added 295,000 square feet to existing Properties and converted 9,000 square feet to premium storage for a total cost of approximately $17.9 million. During 2012, we added 372,000 square feet to existing Properties, and converted 35,000 square feet to premium storage for a total cost of approximately $22.5 million. From 2011 through 2014In 2016 we also installed solar panels on 18six buildings for a total cost of approximately ~~$4.7~~$2.7 million. Although we do not expect to construct any new facilities in ~~2015,~~2017, we do plan to complete approximately ~~$30~~$35.1 million in expansions and enhancements to existing facilities of which ~~$3.3~~$12.6 million was paid prior to December 31, ~~2014.~~2016.

In ~~2014,~~2016, the Company spent approximately ~~$20.4~~$38.6 million for recurring capitalized expenditures including roofing, paving, office renovations, and ~~office renovations.~~new signs related to our rebranding. We expect to spend ~~$19.4~~$30.2 million in ~~2015~~2017 on similar capital expenditures.

During 2016, we sold eight non-strategic storage facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (1), Mississippi (1), Texas (1), and Virginia (4) for net proceeds of approximately $34.1 million, resulting in a $15.3 million gain on sale. During 2015, we sold three non-strategic storage facilities purchased during 2014 and 2015 in Missouri and South Carolina for net proceeds of approximately $4.6 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $0.5 million. During 2014, we sold two non-strategic storage facilities in Texas for net proceeds of approximately $11.0 million resulting in a gain of approximately $5.2 million. During 2013, we sold four non-strategic storage facilities in Florida, Ohio, and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $2.4 million. During 2012, we sold 17 non-strategic storage facilities in Maryland, Michigan, and Texas for net proceeds of approximately $47.7 million resulting in a gain of approximately $4.5 million.

We may seek to sell additional Properties to third parties or joint venture partners in ~~2015.~~2017.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist of our investment in ~~two self storage~~six self-storage joint ventures in which we have aan 85%, 20% ~~and~~, 15% or 5% ownership, as well as our investment in the entity that owns the building that houses our corporate office in which we have a 49% ownership. We account for these real estate entities under the equity method. The debt held by the unconsolidated real estate ~~entity~~entities is secured by the real estate owned by these entities, and is non-recourse to us. See Note 1211 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

As a REIT, we are not required to pay federal income tax on income that we distribute to our shareholders, provided that we satisfy certain requirements, including distributing at least 90% of our REIT taxable income for a taxable year. These distributions must be made in the year to which they relate, or in the following year if declared before we file our federal income tax return, and if they are paid not later than the date of the first regular dividend of the following year.

As a REIT, we must derive at least 95% of our total gross income from income related to real property, interest and dividends. In ~~2014,~~2016, our percentage of revenue from such sources was approximately 97%, thereby passing the 95% test, and no special measures are expected to be required to enable us to maintain our REIT designation. Although we currently intend to operate in a manner designed to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our Board of Directors to revoke our REIT election.

The primary market risk to which we believe we are exposed is interest rate risk, which may result from many factors, including government monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors that are beyond our control.

We have entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates on our variable rate debt. Upon renewal or replacement of the credit facility, our total interest may change dependent on the terms we negotiate with the lenders; however, the LIBOR base rates have been contractually fixed on $325 million of our floating rate bank debt through the interest rate swap termination dates. Forward starting interest rate swaps are also used by the Company to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the potential issuance of long-term debt. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Through September 2018, $325 million of our ~~$374~~$578 million of floating rate unsecured debt is on a fixed rate basis after taking into account our interest rate swap agreements. Based on our outstanding unsecured floating rate debt of ~~$374~~$578 million at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have a ~~$0.5~~$2.5 million effect on our interest expense. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost and our interest rate hedge agreements in effect on December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. These analyses do not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, we would consider taking actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our capital structure.

We do not believe that inflation has had or will have a direct effect on our operations. Substantially all of the leases at the facilities are on a month-to-month basis which provides us with the opportunity to increase rental rates as each lease matures.

Our revenues typically have been higher in the third and fourth quarters, primarily because self-storage facilities tend to experience greater occupancy during the late spring, summer and early fall months due to the greater incidence of residential moves and college student activity during these periods. However, we believe that our customer mix, diverse geographic locations, rental structure and expense structure provide adequate protection against undue fluctuations in cash flows and net revenues during off-peak seasons. Thus, we do not expect seasonality to materially affect ~~materially~~ distributions to shareholders.

The information required is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption “Interest Rate Risk” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” above.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of ~~the Company’s~~Life Storage, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc. at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

~~As discussed~~We also have audited, in ~~Note 2~~accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Life Storage, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Life Storage LP as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of Life Storage LP’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Life Storage LP at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc. changed its method for reporting discontinued operations effective January 1, 2014.~~taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage ~~Inc.’s~~LP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~(1992~~(2013 framework) and our report dated February ~~24, 2015~~27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


	December 31,						December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except share data)	2014			2013			2016			2015
Assets
Investment in storage facilities:
Land	$	397,642		$	312,053		$	786,764		$	480,176
Building, equipment, and construction in progress		1,780,341			1,552,584			3,456,544			2,011,526

		2,177,983			1,864,637			4,243,308			2,491,702
Less: accumulated depreciation		(411,701	)		(366,472	)		(535,704	)		(465,195	)

Investment in storage facilities, net		1,766,282			1,498,165			3,707,604			2,026,507
Cash and cash equivalents		8,543			9,524			23,685			7,020
Accounts receivable		5,758			5,119			5,469			6,805
Receivable from unconsolidated joint ventures		583			883			1,223			929
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		57,803			30,391			67,300			62,520
Prepaid expenses		6,533			5,978			6,649			5,431
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		—			794			—			550
Trade name								16,500			—
Other assets		9,298			11,021			29,554			9,060

Total Assets	$	1,854,800		$	1,561,875		$	3,857,984		$	2,118,822


Liabilities
Line of credit	$	49,000		$	49,000		$	253,000		$	79,000
Term notes		750,000			575,000
Term notes, net								1,387,525			746,650
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		43,551			37,741			75,132			47,839
Deferred revenue		7,290			6,708			9,700			7,511
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		13,341			7,523			13,015			15,343
Mortgages payable		2,127			2,254			13,027			1,993

Total Liabilities		865,309			678,226			1,751,399			898,336

Noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units at redemption value		13,622			12,940			18,091			18,171

Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 34,105,955 shares outstanding at December 31, 2014 (32,532,991 at December 31, 2013)		353			337
Common stock $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 46,454,606 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 (36,710,673 at December 31, 2015)								464			367
Additional paid-in capital		1,183,388			1,066,399			2,348,567			1,388,343
Dividends in excess of net income		(167,692	)		(162,450	)		(239,062	)		(171,980	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(13,005	)		(6,402	)		(21,475	)		(14,415	)
Treasury stock at cost, 1,171,886 shares		(27,175	)		(27,175	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		975,869			870,709			2,088,494			1,202,315
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary								—			—

Total Equity								2,088,494			1,202,315

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	1,854,800		$	1,561,875		$	3,857,984		$	2,118,822


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013			2012			2016			2015			2014
Revenues
Rental income	$	302,044		$	253,384		$	217,906		$	428,121		$	338,435		$	302,044
Other operating income		24,036			20,123			16,176			34,487			28,167			24,036

Total operating revenues		326,080			273,507			234,082			462,608			366,602			326,080

Expenses
Property operations and maintenance		69,763			61,316			55,163			103,388			81,915			75,333
Real estate taxes		32,097			26,496			22,076			47,876			36,563			32,097
General and administrative		40,792			34,939			32,313			43,103			38,659			35,222
Acquisition costs		7,359			3,129			4,328			29,542			2,991			7,359
Write-off of acquired property deposits											1,783			—			—
Operating leases of storage facilities		7,987			1,331			—			—			683			7,987
Depreciation and amortization		51,749			45,233			40,542			117,081			58,506			51,749

Total operating expenses		209,747			172,444			154,422			342,773			219,317			209,747

Income from operations		116,333			101,063			79,660			119,835			147,285			116,333

Other income (expenses)
Interest expense		(34,578	)		(32,000	)		(33,166	)		(47,175	)		(37,124	)		(34,578	)
Interest expense – bridge financing commitment fee											(7,329	)		—			—
Interest income		40			40			4			67			5			40
Gain on sale of storage facilities		5,176			—			—
Gain (loss) on sale of storage facilities											15,270			(494	)		5,176
Gain on sale of real estate		—			421			687			623			—			—
Equity in income of joint ventures		2,086			1,948			936			3,665			3,405			2,086

Income from continuing operations		89,057			71,472			48,121
Income from discontinued operations (including a gain on disposal of $2,431 in 2013 and $4,498 in 2012)		—			3,123			7,520

Net income		89,057			74,595			55,641			84,956			113,077			89,057
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(526	)		(469	)		(513	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership											(398	)		(553	)		(526	)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary											667			—			—

Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	88,531		$	74,126		$	55,128		$	85,225		$	112,524		$	88,531

Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders - basic										$	1.97		$	3.18		$	2.68
Continuing operations	$	2.68		$	2.27		$	1.62
Discontinued operations		—			0.10			0.26

Earnings per share - basic	$	2.68		$	2.37		$	1.88

Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders - diluted										$	1.96		$	3.16		$	2.67
Continuing operations	$	2.67		$	2.26		$	1.61
Discontinued operations		—			0.10			0.26

Earnings per share - diluted	$	2.67		$	2.36		$	1.87


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013			2012
(dollars in thousands)										2016			2015			2014
Net income	$	89,057		$	74,595		$	55,641		$	84,956		$	113,077		$	89,057
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of derivatives net of reclassification to interest expense		(6,603	)		8,840			(4,987	)
Effective portion of loss on derivatives net of reclassification to interest expense											(7,060	)		(1,410	)		(6,603	)

Total comprehensive income		82,454			83,435			50,654			77,896			111,667			82,454
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(487	)		(525	)		(467	)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership											(365	)		(546	)		(487	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary											667			—			—

Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders	$	81,967		$	82,910		$	50,187		$	78,198		$	111,121		$	81,967


(dollars in thousands, except share data)	Common Stock Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Dividends in Excess of Net Income			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Shareholders’ Equity			Common Stock Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Dividends in Excess of Net Income			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance January 1, 2012		28,952,356	$	301	$	862,467		$	(169,799	)	$	(10,255	)	$	(27,175	)	$	655,539

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock		1,400,931		14		75,192			—			—			—			75,206
Exercise of stock options		91,520		1		3,735			—			—			—			3,736
Issuance of non-vested stock		1,813		—		—			—			—			—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock		—		—		2,392			—			—			—			2,392
Stock option expense		—		—		280			—			—			—			280
Deferred compensation outside directors		—		—		122			—			—			—			122
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest		—		—		(584	)		—			—			—			(584	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—		—		—			(5,088	)		—			—			(5,088	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders		—		—		—			55,128			—			—			55,128
Change in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			—			(4,987	)		—			(4,987	)
Dividends		—		—		—			(53,014	)		—			—			(53,014	)

Balance December 31, 2012		30,446,620	$	316	$	943,604		$	(172,773	)	$	(15,242	)	$	(27,175	)	$	728,730

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock		1,667,819		17		107,810			—			—			—			107,827
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through Dividend Reinvestment Plan		68,957		1		4,677			—			—			—			4,678
Exercise of stock options		160,515		1		7,016			—			—			—			7,017
Issuance of non-vested stock		189,080		2		(2	)		—			—			—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock		—		—		2,876			—			—			—			2,876
Stock option expense		—		—		301			—			—			—			301
Deferred compensation outside directors		—		—		118			—			—			—			118
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest		—		—		(1	)		—			—			—			(1	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—		—		—			(524	)		—			—			(524	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders		—		—		—			74,126			—			—			74,126
Change in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			—			8,840			—			8,840
Dividends		—		—		—			(63,279	)		—			—			(63,279	)

Balance December 31, 2013		32,532,991	$	337	$	1,066,399		$	(162,450	)	$	(6,402	)	$	(27,175	)	$	870,709

Balance January 1, 2014																					32,532,991	$	325	$	1,039,236		$	(162,450	)	$	(6,402	)	$	870,709
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock		1,283,505		13		98,968			—			—			—			98,981			1,283,505		13		98,968			—			—			98,981
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through Dividend Reinvestment Plan		171,854		2		12,447			—			—			—			12,449			171,854		2		12,447			—			—			12,449
Exercise of stock options		27,462		—		1,245			—			—			—			1,245			27,462		—		1,245			—			—			1,245
Issuance of non-vested stock		90,143		1		(1	)		—			—			—			—			90,143		1		(1	)		—			—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock		—		—		4,556			—			—			—			4,556			—		—		4,556			—			—			4,556
Stock option expense		—		—		223			—			—			—			223			—		—		223			—			—			223
Deferred compensation outside directors		—		—		121			—			—			—			121			—		—		121			—			—			121
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest		—		—		(570	)		—			—			—			(570	)		—		—		(570	)		—			—			(570	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—		—		—			(3,738	)		—			—			(3,738	)		—		—		—			(3,738	)		—			(3,738	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders		—		—		—			88,531			—			—			88,531			—		—		—			88,531			—			88,531
Change in fair value of derivatives		—		—		—			—			(6,603	)		—			(6,603	)		—		—		—			—			(6,603	)		(6,603	)
Dividends		—		—		—			(90,035	)		—			—			(90,035	)		—		—		—			(90,035	)		—			(90,035	)

Balance December 31, 2014		34,105,955	$	353	$	1,183,388		$	(167,692	)	$	(13,005	)	$	(27,175	)	$	975,869			34,105,955		341		1,156,225			(167,692	)		(13,005	)		975,869
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock																					2,329,911		23		210,119			—			—			210,142
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through Dividend Reinvestment Plan																					151,246		1		13,925			—			—			13,926
Exercise of stock options																					30,900		1		1,632			—			—			1,633
Issuance of non-vested stock																					64,244		1		(1	)		—			—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock																					—		—		6,254			—			—			6,254
Stock option expense																					—		—		210			—			—			210
Deferred compensation outside directors																					28,417		—		59			—			—			59
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest																					—		—		(80	)		—			—			(80	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units																					—		—		—			(3,328	)		—			(3,328	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders																					—		—		—			112,524			—			112,524
Change in fair value of derivatives																					—		—		—			—			(1,410	)		(1,410	)
Dividends																					—		—		—			(113,484	)		—			(113,484	)

Balance December 31, 2015																					36,710,673		367		1,388,343			(171,980	)		(14,415	)		1,202,315
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock																					9,545,000		96		934,867			—			—			934,963
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock through Dividend Reinvestment Plan																					133,666		1		13,165			—			—			13,166
Conversion of operating partnership units to common shares																					41,862		—		4,795			—			—			4,795
Issuance of non-vested stock																					23,405		—		—			—			—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock																					—		—		7,216			—			—			7,216
Stock option expense																					—		—		89			—			—			89
Deferred compensation outside directors																					—		—		92			—			—			92
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units																					—		—		—			4,457			—			4,457
Net income attributable to common shareholders																					—		—		—			85,225			—			85,225
Amortization of terminated hedge included in AOCI																					—		—		—			—			458			458
Change in fair value of derivatives																					—		—		—			—			(7,518	)		(7,518	)
Dividends																					—		—		—			(156,764	)		—			(156,764	)

Balance December 31, 2016																					46,454,606	$	464	$	2,348,567		$	(239,062	)	$	(21,475	)	$	2,088,494


	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012			2016			2015			2014
Operating Activities
Net income	$	89,057		$	74,595		$	55,641		$	84,956		$	113,077		$	89,057
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		51,749			45,546			41,679			117,081			58,506			51,749
Amortization of deferred financing fees		942			834			836
Gain on sale of storage facilities		(5,176	)		—			—
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations		—			(2,431	)		(4,498	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs and bond discount											9,688			1,184			942
(Gain) loss on sale of storage facilities											(15,270	)		494			(5,176	)
Gain on sale of real estate		—			(421	)		(687	)		(623	)		—			—
Equity in (income) losses of joint ventures		(2,086	)		(1,948	)		(936	)
Write-off of acquired property deposits											1,783			—			—
Equity in income of joint ventures											(3,665	)		(3,405	)		(2,086	)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint venture		3,123			2,630			2,184			5,207			4,821			3,123
Non-vested stock earned		4,677			2,994			2,513			7,308			6,313			4,677
Stock option expense		223			301			280			89			210			223
Changes in assets and liabilities (excluding the effects of acquisitions):
Accounts receivable		(606	)		(1,659	)		(451	)		4,814			(1,038	)		(606	)
Prepaid expenses		(457	)		(810	)		(977	)		(230	)		1,132			(457	)
Receipts from (advances to) joint ventures		590			(27	)		(242	)
(Advances to) receipts from joint ventures											(294	)		(346	)		590
Accounts payable and other liabilities		5,187			1,079			4,240			18,494			5,847			5,187
Deferred revenue		(1,155	)		(37	)		(820	)		(3,788	)		(597	)		(1,155	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		146,068			120,646			98,762			225,550			186,198			146,068

Investing Activities
Acquisition of storage facilities		(281,731	)		(94,759	)		(186,870	)
Acquisition of storage facilities, net of cash acquired											(1,750,267	)		(280,010	)		(281,731	)
Improvements, equipment additions, and construction in progress		(35,097	)		(33,889	)		(36,845	)		(72,852	)		(41,739	)		(35,097	)
Net proceeds from the sale of storage facilities		11,191			—			—			34,074			4,646			11,191
Net proceeds from the disposal of discontinued operations		—			11,741			47,698
Net proceeds from the sale of real estate		—			4,866			3,298			623			—			—
Casualty insurance proceeds received		—			—			626
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		(28,650	)		(4,237	)		(3,571	)		(6,438	)		(6,151	)		(28,650	)
Return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures		—			7,360			—
Property deposits		(706	)		(5,427	)		—			(1,209	)		(5,435	)		(706	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(334,993	)		(114,345	)		(175,664	)		(1,796,069	)		(328,689	)		(334,993	)

Financing Activities
Net proceeds from sale of common stock		112,676			119,522			78,943			948,129			225,701			112,676
Proceeds from line of credit		202,000			152,000			154,000			1,102,000			330,000			202,000
Proceeds from term notes		175,000			325,000			—
Repayment of line of credit		(202,000	)		(208,000	)		(95,000	)		(928,000	)		(300,000	)		(202,000	)
Repayment of term notes		—			(325,000	)		—
Financing costs		(3,001	)		(1,554	)		—
Proceeds from term notes, net of discount											796,682			—			175,000
Repayment of term note											(150,000	)		—			—
Debt issuance costs											(15,273	)		—			(3,001	)
Settlement of forward starting interest rate swaps											(9,166	)		—			—
Dividends paid - common stock		(90,035	)		(63,279	)		(53,014	)		(156,249	)		(113,039	)		(90,035	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders		(541	)		(402	)		(549	)		(742	)		(555	)		(541	)
Redemption of operating partnership units		(6,028	)		(322	)		(7,372	)		—			(1,005	)		(6,028	)
Mortgage principal payments		(127	)		(1,997	)		(172	)		(197	)		(134	)		(127	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		187,944			(4,032	)		76,836
Net cash provided by financing activities											1,587,184			140,968			187,944

Net (decrease) increase in cash		(981	)		2,269			(66	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash											16,665			(1,523	)		(981	)
Cash at beginning of period		9,524			7,255			7,321			7,020			8,543			9,524

Cash at end of period	$	8,543		$	9,524		$	7,255		$	23,685		$	7,020		$	8,543

Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized	$	31,764		$	32,909		$	32,402		$	39,856		$	35,926		$	31,764
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds										$	981		$	1,084		$	665

~~Sovran~~Effective August 15, 2016, the Parent Company changed its name from “Sovran Self Storage, Inc. ~~(the “Company,~~” ~~“We,~~to “Life Storage, Inc.” ~~“Our,~~and the Operating Partnership changed its name from “Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership” to “Life Storage LP”. Also, consistent with these name changes, and in connection with the rebranding of our storage facilities from “Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^®” ~~or “Sovran”)~~to “Life Storage^®”, the name of the general partner of the Operating Partnership has been changed from “Sovran Holdings, Inc.” to “Life Storage Holdings, Inc.” and the name of the Parent Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary changed from “Uncle Bob’s Management, LLC” to “Life Storage Solutions, LLC”.

The Parent Company, which operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), was formed on April 19, 1995 to own and operate self-storage facilities throughout the United States. On June 26, 1995, the Parent Company commenced operations effective with the completion of its initial public offering. The Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and their consolidated subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as the “Company.” In addition, terms such as “we,” “us,” or “our” used in this report may refer to the Company, the Parent Company and/or the Operating Partnership.

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, we had an ownership interest in, ~~leased,~~ and/or managed ~~518~~659 self-storage properties in 2529 states under the ~~name~~names Life Storage^® and Uncle Bob’s Self Storage ®.^®. Among our ~~518~~659 self-storage properties are 39 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture (Sovran HHF Storage Holdings LLC) of which we are a 20% owner, 30 properties that we manage for an unconsolidated joint venture (Sovran HHF Storage Holdings II LLC) of which we are a 15% owner, 17and 26 properties that we manage and have no ownership ~~interest, and four properties that we lease.~~interest. Approximately ~~39%~~38% of the Company’s revenue is derived from stores in the states of Texas and Florida.

Basis of Presentation: All of the Company’s assets are owned by, and all its operations are conducted through ~~Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). Sovran~~the Operating Partnership. Life Storage Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent Company ~~(the “Subsidiary”~~(“Holdings”), is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership; the Parent Company is a limited partner of the Operating Partnership, and through its ownership of ~~the Subsidiary~~Holdings and its limited partnership interest controls the operations of the Operating Partnership, holding a 99.5% ownership interest therein as of December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. The remaining ownership interests in the Operating Partnership (the “Units”) are held by certain former owners of assets acquired by the Operating ~~Partnership subsequent to its formation.~~Partnership.

We consolidate all wholly owned subsidiaries. Partially owned subsidiaries and joint ventures are consolidated when we control the entity. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, ~~Uncle Bob’s Management, LLC (the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary), Locke Sovran I, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary),~~ and ~~Locke Sovran II, LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary).~~Life Storage Solutions, LLC. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in joint ventures that we do not control but for which we have significant influence over are accounted for using the equity method.

On June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a newly formed joint venture agreement with an owner of a self-storage facility in New Jersey (West Deptford JV LLC). As part of the agreement the Company contributed $4.2 million to the joint venture for a $2.8 million mortgage note at 8%, a 20% common interest, and a $1.4 million preferred interest with an 8% preferred return. The Company had concluded that this joint venture is a variable interest entity pursuant to the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 810, “~~Consolidation~~~~” on the basis that the total equity investment~~Included in the joint venture is not sufficient to permit the joint venture to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from its investors. On February 5, 2013 the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement to sell its common and preferred interests in West Deptford JV LLC to the other joint venture partner for approximately $1.4 million, resulting in a gain of $0.4 million. Simultaneous with this transaction the joint venture partner also repaid the $2.8 million mortgage note held by the Company. As a result of these transactions the Company no longer holds any ownership interest in this joint venture. The results of operations of this joint venture are included in our consolidated financial statements through the February 5, 2013 date of divesture.

~~Included in the~~Parent Company’s consolidated balance sheets are noncontrolling redeemable operating partnership ~~units.~~units and included in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated balance sheets are limited partners’ redeemable capital interest at redemption value. These interests are presented in the “mezzanine” section of the consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets because they do not meet the functional definition of a liability or equity under current accounting literature. These represent the outside ownership interests of the limited partners in the Operating Partnership. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, there were ~~155,484~~217,481 noncontrolling redeemable operating partnership Units outstanding ~~(198,913~~(168,866 at December 31, ~~2013)~~2015). These unitholders are entitled to receive distributions per unit equivalent to the dividends declared per share on the

Parent Company’s common stock. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each of these limited partnership Units in the Operating Partnership at the request of the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock, at the time of such redemption, provided that the Company at its option may elect to acquire any such Unit presented for redemption for one common share or cash. The Company accounts for these noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership

Units under the provisions of EITF D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities” which was codified in FASB ASC Topic480-10-S99. The application of the FASB ASC Topic 480-10-S99 accounting model requires the noncontrolling interest to follow normal noncontrolling interest accounting and then be marked to redemption value at the end of each reporting period if higher (but never adjusted below that normal noncontrolling interest accounting amount). The offset to the adjustment to the carrying amount of the noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units is reflected in the Parent Company’s dividends in excess of net ~~income.~~income and in the Operating Partnership’s general partner and limited partners capital balances. Accordingly, in the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet,~~sheets, noncontrolling ~~redeemable Operating Partnership Units~~interests are reflected at redemption value at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, equal to the number of ~~Units~~noncontrolling interest units outstanding multiplied by the fair market value of the Parent Company’s common stock at that date. Redemption value exceeded the value determined under the Company’s historical basis of accounting at those dates.

The following is a reconciliation of the Parent Company’s noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units:

The following is a reconciliation of the Operating Partnership’s limited partners’ redeemable capital interest:

In ~~2014~~2016 the ~~Company~~Operating Partnership issued ~~28,481~~90,477 Units with a fair value of ~~$2.4~~$9.5 million to acquire self-storage properties. In 2015 the Company issued 23,382 Units with a fair value of $2.1 million to acquire one self-storage property. The fair value of the Units on the ~~date~~dates of issuance was determined based upon the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on ~~that date.~~those dates.

Operating Partnership Units redeemed in 2016 were redeemed for a total of 41,862 shares of the Parent Company.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. ~~Cash and cash equivalents include $6,000 and $34,000 held in escrow for an encumbered property at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.~~

Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable are composed of trade and other receivables recorded at billed amounts and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable uncollectible amounts in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on a number of factors, including experience, credit worthiness of customers, and current market and economic conditions. The Company reviews the allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded as a reduction of accounts receivable and amounted to ~~$0.5 million, $0.4~~$1.0 million and $0.4 million at December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016 and ~~2012,~~2015, respectively.

Revenue and Expense Recognition: Rental income is recognized when earned pursuant to month-to-month leases for storage space. Promotional discounts are recognized as a reduction to rental income over the promotional period, which is generally during the first month of occupancy. Rental income received prior to the start of the rental period is included in deferred revenue. Equity in earnings of real estate joint ventures that we have significant influence over is recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of these entities.

Cost of operations, general and administrative expense, interest expense and advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, advertising costs were ~~$6.2~~$9.5 million, ~~$5.4~~$7.3 million, and ~~$4.6~~$6.2 million, respectively. The Company accrues property taxes based on estimates and historical trends. If these estimates are incorrect, the timing and amount of expense recognition would be affected.

Other Operating Income: Consists primarily of sales of storage-related merchandise (locks and packing supplies), insurance ~~commissions,~~administrative fees, incidental truck rentals, and management and acquisition fees from unconsolidated joint ventures.

Investment in Storage Facilities: Storage facilities are recorded at cost. The purchase price of acquired facilities is allocated to land, land improvements, building, equipment, and in-place customer leases based on the fair value of each component. The fair values of land are determined based upon comparable market sales information. The fair values of buildings are determined based upon estimates of current replacement costs adjusted for depreciation on the properties. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, ~~2013, and 2012, $7.4~~$29.5 million, ~~$3.1~~$3.0 million, and ~~$4.3~~$7.4 million of acquisition related costs were incurred and expensed, respectively.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of forty years for buildings and improvements, and five to twenty years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Estimated useful lives are reevaluated when facts and circumstances indicate that the economic lives of assets do not extend to their currently assigned useful lives. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Depreciation expense was $87.2 million, $55.1 million and $47.7 million for the years ending December 31 206, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Interest and other costs incurred during the construction period of major expansions are capitalized. Capitalized interest during the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012~~2014 was $0.1 million ~~$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.~~annually. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the basis of the Company’s property may not be recoverable, the Company’s policy is to complete an assessment of impairment. Impairment is evaluated based upon comparing the sum of the property’s expected undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value of the property. If the sum of the undiscounted cash ~~flow~~flows is less than the carrying amount of the property, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. For the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012,~~2014, no assets ~~had~~have been determined to be impaired under this policy.

In general, sales of real estate and related profits / losses are recognized when all consideration has changed hands and risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred.

Trade Name: The Company’s trade name has an indefinite life and is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the Company’s trade name may not be recoverable. We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment that considers economic, industry and company-specific factors as part of our annual test. If, after completing this assessment, it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the trade name is less than its carrying value, we proceed to a quantitative test. We did not elect to perform a qualitative assessment in 2016.

Quantitative testing requires a comparison of the fair value of the trade name to its carrying value. We use a discounted cash flow analysis under the relief-from-royalty method to estimate the fair value of the trade name. This method incorporates various assumptions, including projected revenue growth rates, the terminal growth rate, the royalty rate to be applied, and the discount rate utilized. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the trade name is considered impaired to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the fair value. We did not record any impairment in 2016, the year in which the trade name was acquired.

Other Assets: Included in other assets are ~~net deferred financing costs,~~cash balances held in escrow for encumbered properties, property deposits and the value placed on in-place customer leases at the time of acquisition. ~~The gross deferred financing costs were $8.2 million and $6.3 million~~Cash held in escrow for encumbered properties at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, totaled $238,000 and $12,000, respectively. Accumulated amortization on gross deferred financing costs was approximately $1.9 million and $2.0 million at December 31, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt. Property deposits at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 were ~~$0.8~~$2.4 million and ~~$5.6~~$5.9 million, respectively. In 2016, a decision was made to not proceed with the acquisition of two properties on which the Company had previously made property deposits totaling $1.8 million. As a result, these property deposits were abandoned and are included in write-off of acquired property deposits on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No such expenses were incurred in 2015 or 2014.

The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price of acquisitions to in-place customer leases. The methodology used to determine the fair value of in-place customer leases is disclosed in Note 9.8. The Company amortizes in-place customer leases on a straight-line basis over 12 months (the estimated future benefit period).

Amortization expense related to deferred financing costs was $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million for the periods ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: The Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, where the Company has significant influence, but not control and joint ventures which are ~~VIEs~~variable interest entities in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, are recorded under the equity method of accounting in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Under the equity method, the Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint ventures is stated at cost and adjusted for the Company’s share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures is generally recognized based on the Company’s ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated joint ventures. For the purposes of presentation in the statement of cash flows, the Company follows the “look through” approach for classification of distributions from joint ventures. Under this approach, distributions are reported under operating cash flow unless

the facts and circumstances of a specific distribution clearly indicate that it is a return of capital (e.g., a liquidating dividend or distribution of the proceeds from the joint venture’s sale of assets), in which case it is reported as an investing activity.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consists primarily of trade payables, accrued interest, and property tax accruals. ~~The Company accrues property tax expense based on estimates and historical trends. Actual expense could differ from these estimates.~~

Income Taxes: The Company qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and will generally not be subject to corporate income taxes to the extent it distributes its taxable income to its shareholders and complies with certain other requirements.

The Company has elected to treat one of its subsidiaries as a taxable REIT subsidiary. In general, the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary may perform additional services for tenants and generally may engage in certain real estate or non-real estate related business. A taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to corporate federal and state income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities.

For the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012,~~2014, the Company recorded federal and state income tax expense of ~~$0.9~~$0.4 million, ~~$0.9~~$1.3 million, and ~~$1.3~~$0.9 million, respectively. The ~~2014~~2016 income tax expense includes current expense of ~~$0.5~~$0.1 million and deferred tax expense of ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million. At December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. Interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions will be recognized in income tax expense when incurred. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, the Company had no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax provisions. Net income taxes payable and the net deferred tax liability of our taxable REIT subsidiary are classified within accounts payable and accrued liabilities and prepaid taxes are classified within prepaid expenses in the consolidated balance ~~sheet.~~sheets. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary has ~~current~~ prepaid taxes of ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million, deferred tax assets of $1.5 million and a deferred tax liability of ~~$1.3~~$2.2 million. As of December 31, ~~2013,~~2015, the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary had ~~current~~ prepaid taxes of ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million and a deferred tax liability of ~~$0.9~~$1.2 million.

Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, which requires companies to carry all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of derivatives using an income approach. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to cash flow hedges of certain interest rate risks.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” This ASU provides explicit guidance regarding the presentation in the statement of financial position of an unrecognized tax benefit when net operating losses or tax credit carryforwards exist. It is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted, and is applicable to the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In April~~May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and disclosures of Components of an Entity”. Under this ASU, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. The ASU also requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. It is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2014 and the adoption is expected to significantly reduce the classification of property sales by the Company as discontinued operations.

During 2014 the Company sold two properties with a carrying value of $5.8 million and received cash proceeds of $11.0 million, resulting in a $5.2 million gain on sale. The following table summarizes the revenues and expenses up to the date of sale of the two properties sold in 2014 that are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for 2014, 2013 and 2012.

~~In May 2014,~~ FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),” and requires an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, ~~2016.~~2017. The Company has the option to apply the provisions of ASU 2014-09 either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. ~~The Company has not yet completed its assessment~~We are currently evaluating the alternative methods of adoption and the ~~impact that~~effect of adopting ASU 2014-09 on our financial statements and related disclosures. We are also in the process of assessing which of our operating revenue streams will be impacted by the adoption of the new standard. Leases are specifically excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09, therefore the Company does not anticipate that adoption of the new standard will have any impact on ~~its consolidated financial statements.~~the timing or amounts of the Company’s rental revenue from customers which is a substantial portion of the Company’s total operating revenues. The Company intends to make a decision on which method of adoption will be elected by the end of the second quarter of 2017.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period,” which requires a reporting entity to treat a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2014-12 may be adopted either prospectively for share-based payment awards granted or modified on or after the effective date, or retrospectively, using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach would apply to share-based payment awards outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements on adoption, and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The ~~Company does not expect the~~ adoption of ASU 2014-12 toby the Company did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 310-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” which is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and annual and interim periods thereafter. This ASU requires management to make an assessment for each annual and interim reporting period as to whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. If management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, certain additional considerations and disclosures are required to be made. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 by the Company did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 including interim periods within that reporting period. ASU 2015-02 amends the current consolidation model specifically as it relates to variable interest entities (“VIE’s”) and provides reporting entities with a revised consolidation analysis procedure. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 by the Company did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which amends the requirements for the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with retrospective application required. Consistent with the guidance in ASU No. 2015-03 there are $3.4 million of debt issuance costs that have been presented as a reduction of term notes in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 that were previously classified in other assets prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03. The implementation of this accounting standards update had no effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-15, “Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 codifies an SEC staff announcement that entities are permitted to defer and present debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as assets. ASU No. 2015-15 is effective for fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The implementation of this update did not result in any changes to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”. ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 by the Company did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. This guidance revises existing practice related to accounting for leases under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840Leases(ASC 840) for both lessees and lessors. The new guidance in ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The lease liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments and the right-of-use asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. For lessees, operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current accounting by lessees for operating leases under ASC 840) while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting by lessees for capital leases under ASC 840). While the new standard maintains similar accounting for lessors as under ASC 840, the new standard reflects updates to, among other things, align with certain changes to the lessee model. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods, within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments”. ASU 2016-06 simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by removing the requirement to assess whether a contingent event is related to interest rates or credit risks. The new standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2017. The Company has determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-06 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, “Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting”. ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an adjustment must be made to the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The new standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2017. The Company has determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-07 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” as part of its simplification initiative, which involves several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company has determined that the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” in an effort to reduce existing diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statements of cash flows. The guidance addresses the classification of cash flows related to, among other things, distributions received from equity method investees. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” which requires restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of this update is permitted. Other than modifications to the statement of cash flows, the adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” which is intended to assist entities with evaluating whether a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of this update is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 is expected to have potential impact on the accounting treatment of properties acquired subsequent to the adoption date. Property acquisitions treated as business combinations under current guidance may no longer be treated as business combinations subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2017-01. We are in the process of evaluating whether the properties we acquire will meet the definition of a “business” under ASU 2017-01. To the extent they do not meet such definition, future acquisitions of properties may be accounted for as asset acquisitions resulting in the capitalization of acquisition costs incurred in connection with these transactions and the allocation of the purchase price and related acquisition costs to the assets acquired based on their relative fair values.

Stock-Based Compensation: The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation”. The Company recognizes compensation cost in its financial statements for all share based payments granted, modified, or settled during the period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period.

The Company recorded compensation expense (included in general and administrative expense) of $89,000, $210,000, and $223,000, ~~$301,000 and $280,000~~respectively, related to stock options and $7.2 million, $6.3 million, and $4.6 million, ~~$2.9 million and $2.4 million~~respectively, related to amortization of non-vested stock grants for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012, respectively.~~2014. The Company uses the Black-Scholes Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted subsequent to the adoption of ASC Topic 718. The application of this pricing model involves assumptions that are judgmental and sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The ~~weighted average for key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted during 2014 follows:~~

~~The~~ weighted-average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012,~~2014, were ~~$13.95~~$9.90 and ~~$12.40,~~$10.04, respectively. There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2016.

To determine expected volatility, the Company uses historical volatility based on daily closing prices of its Common Stock over periods that correlate with the expected terms of the options granted. The risk-free rate is based on the United States Treasury yield curve at the time of grant for the expected life of the options granted. Expected dividends are based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The expected life of stock options is based on the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term.

During ~~2014~~2016, 2015 and ~~2013,~~2014, the Company issued performance based non-vested stock awards to certain executives. The fair value for the performance based ~~non-vested shares granted~~awards in ~~2014~~2016, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014 was estimated at the time the ~~shares~~awards were granted using a Monte Carlo pricing model applying the following assumptions:


	2014			2013			2016			2015			2014
Expected life (years)		3.0			3.0			3.0			3.0			3.0
Risk free interest rate		1.18	%		0.64	%		1.53	%		1.33	%		1.18	%
Expected volatility		18.42	%		24.78	%		19.37	%		18.88	%		18.42	%
Fair value	$	46.95		$	35.32		$	80.24		$	101.43		$	46.95

The Monte Carlo pricing model was not used to value any other ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012~~2014 non-vested shares granted as no market conditions were present in these awards. The value of these other non-vested shares was equal to the stock price on the date of grant.

Reclassification: As noted below, certain amounts in the 2014 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2015 and 2016 presentation.

Internet advertising expense, which had been included in the general and administrative expense line in financial statements filed in 2014 and prior years, has been reclassified to property operations and maintenance expense to conform with the current presentation which we implemented in the first quarter of 2015. The Company believes the classification of internet advertising expenses as property operations and maintenance expense is more consistent with industry trends. The amount of internet advertising expense that was reclassified for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.6 million.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company reports earnings per share and earnings per unit data in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Effective January 1, 2009, FASB ASC Topic 260 was updated for the issuance of FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”, or FSP EITF 03-6-1, with transition guidance included in FASB ASC Topic 260-10-65-2. Under FSP EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings-per-share pursuant to the two-class method. The Parent Company ~~has~~and the Operating Partnership have calculated ~~its~~their basic and diluted earnings per ~~share~~share/unit using the two-class method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share utilizing the two-class method.

   Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
   2014    2013    2012
Numerator:

Net income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
   $ 88,531    $ 71,023    $ 47,677
Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares
   33,019    31,297    29,358
Effect of Dilutive Securities:

Stock options and non-vested stock
   172    156    131






Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversion
33,191 31,453 29,489
Basic Earnings per Common Share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
$ 2.68 $ 2.27 $ 1.62
Basic Earnings per Common Share attributable to common shareholders
$ 2.68 $ 2.37 $ 1.88
Diluted Earnings per Common Share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
$ 2.67 $ 2.26 $ 1.61
Diluted Earnings per Common Share attributable to common shareholders
$ 2.67 $ 2.36 $ 1.87

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common unit utilizing the two-class method.

Not included in the effect of dilutive securities above are 107,283 unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2016; and 5,500 stock options and 152,835 unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2015; and 5,000 stock options and 151,474 unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2014; and 2,000 stock options and 112,664 unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2013; and 31,375 stock options and 121,711 unvested restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2012,2014, because their effect would be antidilutive.

The following summarizes activity in storage facilities during the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and December 31, ~~2013.~~2015.


(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2016			2015
Cost:
Beginning balance	$	1,864,637		$	1,742,354		$	2,491,702		$	2,177,983
Acquisition of storage facilities		286,691			93,376			1,714,029			278,572
Improvements and equipment additions		40,137			32,241			65,860			39,807
Increase (decrease) in construction in progress		(5,040	)		1,570
Dispositions and impairments		(8,442	)		(4,904	)
Net increase in construction in progress								7,525			2,239
Dispositions								(35,808	)		(6,899	)

Ending balance	$	2,177,983		$	1,864,637		$	4,243,308		$	2,491,702

Accumulated Depreciation:
Beginning balance	$	366,472		$	324,963		$	465,195		$	411,701
Additions during the year		47,656			41,929			87,219			55,101
Dispositions and impairments		(2,427	)		(420	)
Dispositions								(16,710	)		(1,607	)

Ending balance	$	411,701		$	366,472		$	535,704		$	465,195

On July 15, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding partnership interests in LifeStorage, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“LS”). Pursuant to the acquisition, the Company acquired 83 self-storage properties throughout the country, including the following markets: Chicago, Illinois; Las Vegas, Nevada; Sacramento, California; Austin, Texas; and Los Angeles, California. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 18, 2016 by and among LS, the Operating Partnership, Solar Lunar Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, and Fortis Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Sellers’ Representative, the Company paid aggregate consideration of approximately $1.3 billion, of which $482 million was paid to discharge existing indebtedness of LS (including prepayment penalties and defeasance costs totaling $15.5 million). The merger was funded with the existing cash that was generated primarily from the proceeds from the Company’s May 2016 common stock offering and the 2026 Senior Notes offering, and draws on the Company’s line of credit totaling $482 million.

Including the LS acquisition, the Company acquired 122 facilities during 2016. The acquisition of three stores that were acquired at certificate of occupancy were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The cost of these stores, including closing costs, was assigned to land, building, equipment and improvements components based upon their relative fair values. The assets and liabilities of the ~~acquired~~other 119 storage facilities acquired in 2016, which primarily consist of tangible and intangible assets, are measured at fair value on the date of acquisition in accordance with the principles of FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and ~~Disclosures.”~~Disclosures” ~~During 2014~~ and ~~2013,~~were accounted for as business combinations in accordance with the principles of FASB ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations.”

The Company acquired 27 facilities during 2015. The four facilities acquired in Connecticut and New York on February 2, 2015 had been leased by the Company since November 1, 2013. The acquisitions of these four stores and three additional stores that were acquired 33at certificate of occupancy were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The cost of these seven stores, including closing costs, was assigned to their land, building, equipment and ~~11 self-storage~~improvements components based upon their relative fair values. The assets and liabilities of the other 20 storage facilities ~~respectively,~~acquired in 2015, which primarily consist of tangible and intangible assets, are measured at fair value on the date of acquisition in accordance with the principles of FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” and were accounted for as business combinations in accordance with the principles of FASB ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations.”

The purchase price of the 122 facilities ~~was~~acquired in 2016 and the 27 facilities acquired in 2015 has been assigned as follows (as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 the purchase price assignments relating to the facilities acquired during the second half of ~~2014~~2016 are preliminary):


(dollars in thousands)							Consideration paid							Acquisition Date Fair Value
State	Number of Properties		Date of Acquisition		Purchase Price		Cash Paid		Value of Operating Partnership Units Issued		Net Other Liabilities Assumed (Assets Acquired)			Land		Building, Equipment, and Improvements		In-Place Customer Leases		Closing Costs Expensed
2015
CT		2		2/2/2015	$	61,116	$	62,377	$	—	$	(1,261	)	$	19,389	$	41,727	$	—	$	—
NY		2		2/2/2015		57,900		59,103		—		(1,203	)		10,084		47,816		—		—
IL		1		2/5/2015		6,800		6,652		—		148			2,579		4,066		155		146
IL		1		3/9/2015		8,690		6,466		2,148		76			1,719		6,971		—		—
FL		1		4/1/2015		6,290		6,236		—		54			1,793		4,382		115		359
TX		1		4/16/2015		8,800		8,713		—		87			3,864		4,777		159		140
FL		1		4/21/2015		8,750		8,687		—		63			2,118		6,501		131		122
FL		4		5/1/2015		32,465		32,279		—		186			12,184		19,672		609		516
AZ		1		6/16/2015		7,904		7,904		—		—			852		7,052		—		—
MA		1		6/19/2015		10,291		10,286		—		5			2,110		8,181		—		—
NY		4		8/25/2015		17,900		17,690		—		210			4,685		12,826		389		409
NC		1		9/1/2015		3,775		3,762		—		13			718		2,977		80		80
SC		6		9/1/2015		44,000		43,564		—		436			17,461		25,644		895		684
PA		1		12/30/2015		6,550		6,541		—		9			1,926		4,498		126		190

Total acquired 2015		27			$	281,231	$	280,260	$	2,148	$	(1,177	)	$	81,482	$	197,090	$	2,659	$	2,646

All of the properties acquired ~~in 2014 and 2013~~ were purchased from unrelated third parties. The operating results of the four facilities which had been leased since November 1, 2013 have been included in the Company’s operations since that date. The operating results of the other facilities acquired ~~facilities~~ have been included in the Company’s operations since the respective acquisition dates. The $1,796.9 million of cash paid for the properties acquired during 2016 includes payment for cash acquired of $40.9 million and $5.3 million of deposits that were paid in 2015 when certain of these properties originally went under contract. Of the ~~$287.3~~$280.3 million paid at closing for the properties acquired during ~~2014, $5.6 million~~2015, $250,000 represented deposits that were paid in ~~2013~~2014 when certain of these properties originally went under contract.

Non-cash investing activities during 2016 include the issuance of $9.5 million in Operating Partnership Units valued based on the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of acquisition, the assumption of three mortgages with acquisition-date fair values of $11.3 million, and the assumption of net other liabilities of $7.2 million. Non-cash investing activities during 2015 include the issuance of $2.1 million in Operating Partnership Units, the assumption of $1.3 million of other net liabilities and $2.5 million for the settlement of a straight-line rent liability in connection with the acquisition of self-storage facilities.

The Company measures the fair value of in-place customer lease intangible assets based on the Company’s experience with customer ~~turnover.~~turnover and the estimated cost to replace the in-place leases. The Company amortizes in-place customer leases on a straight-line basis over 12 months (the estimated future benefit period). The Company measures the value of trade names, which have an indefinite life and are not amortized, by calculating discounted cash flows utilizing the relief from royalty method.

In-place customer leases are included in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013
(dollars in thousands)							2016			2015
In-place customer leases	$	19,867		$	14,643		$	75,611		$	22,320
Accumulated amortization		(17,663	)		(13,551	)		(50,782	)		(21,017	)

Net carrying value at December 31,	$	2,204		$	1,092		$	24,829		$	1,303

Amortization expense related to in-place customer leases was ~~$4.1~~$29.9 million, ~~$3.3~~$3.4 million, and ~~$3.3~~$4.1 million, for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, respectively. Amortization expense ~~in 2015~~on 2016 acquisitions is expected to be ~~$2.2 million.~~$24.8 million in 2017.

As noted above, during ~~2014,~~2016, the Company acquired ~~33 properties.~~122 properties, 119 of which were accounted for as business combinations. The following unaudited pro forma information is based on the combined historical financial statements of the Company and the 33119 properties acquired during 2016, and ~~presents the Company’s results~~accounted for as business acquisitions, as if the acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, ~~2012:~~2015:


(dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012		2016		2015
Total revenues	$	337,168	$	300,589	$	258,450	$	513,565	$	465,614
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	99,103	$	75,622	$	41,942	$	154,522	$	54,144
Earnings per common share
Basic	$	2.94	$	2.25	$	1.25	$	3.34	$	1.17
Diluted	$	2.93	$	2.23	$	1.24	$	3.33	$	1.17

The above pro forma information includes the results of eight stores acquired by LS in 2016 and 17 stores acquired by LS in 2015. These stores therefore were not owned by LS for the entire pro forma periods and results prior to LS ownership are not included in the above pro forma information. The above pro forma information also includes increases in amortization of in-place customer leases totaling $53.4 million in 2015. As noted above, in-place customer leases are amortized over their estimated future benefit period of 12 months. Material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combinations and included in the above pro forma financial information include reductions to interest expense related to acquisition bridge financing totaling $7.3 million in 2016, reductions to acquisition costs totaling $29.5 million in 2016, and reductions to write-off of acquired property deposits totaling $1.8 million in 2016.

The following table summarizes the revenues and earnings ~~related to the 33 properties~~ since the acquisition dates that are included in the Company’s ~~2014~~2016 consolidated ~~statements~~statement of ~~operations.~~operations related to the 119 properties acquired and accounted for as business combinations during 2016.


(dollars in thousands)
Total revenues	$	16,793		$	68,526
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(7,953	)	$	(52,814	)

The above net ~~losses~~loss attributable to common shareholders ~~were~~was primarily due to amortization of in-place customer leases acquired and the acquisition costs incurred in connection with the ~~2014~~2016 acquisitions.

~~In the 4~~^th ~~quarter of 2013,~~During 2016 the Company sold ~~four~~eight non-strategic ~~storage facilities in Florida (2), Ohio (1),~~properties with a carrying value of $18.8 million and ~~Virginia (1) for net~~received cash proceeds of ~~approximately $11.7~~$34.1 million, resulting in a $15.3 million gain ~~of approximately $2.4 million. In 2012,~~on sale. During 2015 the Company sold 17three non-strategic ~~storage facilities~~properties purchased in ~~Maryland (1), Michigan (4),~~2014 and ~~Texas (12) for net~~2015 with a carrying value of $5.1 million and received cash proceeds of ~~approximately $47.7~~$4.6 million, resulting in a $0.5 million loss on sale. During 2014 the Company sold two properties with a carrying value of $5.8 million and received cash proceeds of $11.0 million, resulting in a $5.2 million gain on sale.

The following table summarizes the revenues and expenses up to the dates of sale of the 13 properties sold in 2016, 2015 and 2014 that are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for 2016, 2015 and 2014.

The change in name of the Company’s storage facilities from Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® to Life Storage^® as discussed in Note 1 requires replacement of signage at all existing storage facilities which are currently included in investment in storage facilities, net on the consolidated balance sheets. The replacement of this signage is being completed at various times based on market, and is expected to be completed in the first half of 2017. The Company has reassessed the estimated useful lives of the existing signage which resulted in an increase in depreciation expense of approximately ~~$4.5 million. The operations of these facilities and~~$8.2 million in 2016 as depreciation was accelerated over the loss or gain on sale are reported as discontinued operations. Cash flows of discontinued operations have not been segregated from the cash flows of continuing operations on the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.new useful lives. The Company ~~did not report any dispositions~~estimates that this change will result in depreciation expense of ~~facilities~~approximately $1 million in 2017 as ~~discontinued operations in 2014. The following is~~ a ~~summary~~result of the ~~amounts reported as discontinued operations in 2013~~replacement of this existing Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® signage.

The accelerated depreciation reduced 2016 basic and ~~2012:~~diluted earnings by approximately $0.19 per share/unit.

Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders was $71.0 million and $47.7 million in 2013, and 2012, respectively. Income from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders was $3.1 million and $7.5 million in 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Borrowings outstanding on our unsecured line of credit and term notes are as follows:


	Dec. 31,		Dec. 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013
(Dollars in thousands)					Dec. 31, 2016			Dec. 31, 2015
Revolving line of credit borrowings	$	49,000	$	49,000	$	253,000		$	79,000

Term note due April 13, 2016		150,000		150,000
Term note due April 26, 2016						—			150,000
Term note due June 4, 2020		325,000		325,000		325,000			325,000
Term note due August 5, 2021		100,000		100,000		100,000			100,000
Term note due April 8, 2024		175,000		—		175,000			175,000
Senior term note due July 1, 2026						600,000			—
Term note due July 21, 2028						200,000			—

Total term notes payable	$	750,000	$	575,000
Total term note principal balance outstanding					$	1,400,000		$	750,000
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs						(9,323	)		(3,350	)
Less: unamortized senior term note discount						(3,152	)		—

Term notes payable					$	1,387,525		$	746,650

~~On December 10, 2014,~~In January 2016, the Company ~~amended~~exercised the expansion feature on its existing amended unsecured credit ~~agreement. As part of~~agreement and increased the ~~amended agreement, the Company increased its~~ revolving credit limit from ~~$175~~$300 million to ~~$300~~$500 million. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable annual rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 the margin is ~~1.30%~~1.10%), and requires ~~a 0.20%~~an annual 0.15% facility fee. The ~~amended~~Company’s unsecured credit agreement also ~~reduced the interest rate on the~~includes a $325 million unsecured term note maturing June 4, 2020, with the term note bearing interest at LIBOR plus a margin based on the Company’s credit rating (at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 the margin is ~~1.40%~~1.15%). The interest rate at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 on the Company’s line of credit was approximately ~~1.46% (1.67%~~1.79% (1.72% at December 31, ~~2013)~~2015). At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, there was ~~$250.3~~$247 million available on the unsecured line of ~~credit net of outstanding letters of credit of $0.7 million.~~credit. The revolving line of credit has a maturity date of December 10, 2019. ~~The amended agreement also provides~~

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into two senior unsecured acquisition bridge facilities (the “Bridge Facilities”) totaling $1,675 million with the Company’s third-party advisors to the LS acquisition (see Note 4). In consideration for ~~an increase~~the bridge financing commitments, the Company paid fees totaling $7.3 million which are included as interest expense – bridge financing commitment fee in the ~~revolving credit facility~~2016 consolidated statement of operations. The Bridge Facilities commitments were not drawn upon and were terminated on June 29, 2016.

On June 20, 2016, the ~~bank term~~Operating Partnership issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% unsecured senior notes due July 1, 2026 (the “2026 Senior Notes”). The 2026 Senior Notes were issued at a 0.553% discount to par value. Interest on the ~~Company’s request~~2026 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1, beginning on January 1, 2017. The 2026 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent Company. Proceeds received upon issuance, net of discount to ~~an aggregate amount up to $850~~par of $3.3 million and underwriting discount and other offering expenses of $5.5 million, totaled $591.2 million.

~~In connection with~~ The indenture under which the ~~execution~~2026 Senior Notes were issued restricts the ability of the ~~amendment~~Company and its subsidiaries to ~~our unsecured credit agreement, it was determined that~~incur debt unless the ~~borrowing capacity~~Company and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a leverage ratio not to exceed 60% and an interest coverage ratio of ~~nine~~more than 1.5:1 on all outstanding debt, after giving effect to the incurrence of the ~~lenders participating in~~debt. The indenture also restricts the ~~revolving line~~ability of ~~credit exceeded their borrowing capacities prior~~the Company and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt unless the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 40% after giving effect to the amendment. As a result, for these nine lenders the unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the agreement prior to its amendment remain deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the termincurrence of the ~~newly amended agreement. Fees~~debt. The indenture also contains other financial and ~~other costs paid~~customary covenants, including a covenant not to ~~execute the amendment relating to the revolving line of credit totaling $1.3 million were recorded as additional deferred financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term~~own unencumbered assets with a value less than 150% of the ~~newly amended agreement.~~

~~The~~unsecured indebtedness of the Company ~~paid $1.0 million~~and its consolidated subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2016, the Company was in ~~fees to lenders for their commitments~~compliance with all of the financial covenants under the ~~unsecured~~2026 Senior Notes.

On July 21, 2016, the Company entered into a $200 million term note maturing July 21, 2028 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 3.67%. The proceeds from this term note were used to repay a portion of the ~~newly amended agreement. These lenders’ commitments were determined to be a modification~~then outstanding balance on the Company’s line of their unsecured term note commitments prior to the amendment. Such costs were recorded as additional deferred financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the newly amended agreement. In addition, for the nine continuing lenders’ the previously unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the unsecured term note commitments prior to the amendment remain deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the newly amended agreement.credit.

On April 8, 2014, the Company entered into a $175 million term note maturing April 2024 bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.533%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 6.283% if the Company is not rated by at least one rating agency or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to repay the $115 million outstanding on the Company’s line of credit at April 8, 2014, with the excess proceeds used for acquisitions.

In 2011, the Company entered into a $100 million term note maturing August 5, 2021 bearing interest at a

fixed rate of 5.54%. The interest rate on the term note increases to 7.29% if the notes are not rated by at least one rating agency, the credit rating on the notes is downgraded or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded. The proceeds from this term note were used to fund acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.

The Company ~~also maintains~~had maintained a $150 million unsecured term note maturing April ~~13,~~26, 2016 bearing interest at 6.38%. The ~~interest rate~~Company used a draw on the ~~$150 million unsecured term~~line of credit to pay off the balance of this note ~~increases to 8.13% if the notes are not rated by at least one rating agency, the credit rating~~ on ~~the notes is downgraded or the Company’s credit rating is downgraded.~~April 26, 2016.

The line of credit and term notes require the Company to meet certain financial covenants, measured on a quarterly basis, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and limitations on dividend payouts. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.

We believe that if operating results remain consistent with historical levels and levels of other debt and liabilities remain consistent with amounts outstanding at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 the entire availability on the line of credit could be drawn without violating our debt covenants.

7.Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2015-03, deferred debt issuance costs and the discount on the 2026 Senior Notes are both presented as reductions of term notes in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Amortization expense related to these deferred debt issuance costs, which exclude costs related to the Bridge Facilities, was $1.7 million, $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the periods ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Mortgages payable at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 consist of the following:


(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
5.99% mortgage notes due May 1, 2026, secured by 1 self-storage facility with an aggregate net book value of $4.4 million, principal and interest paid monthly (effective interest rate 6.19%)		2,127		2,254
4.98% mortgage note due January 1, 2021 secured by one self-storage facility with an aggregate net book value of $9.8 million, principal and interest paid monthly (effective interest rate 4.98%)					$	2,966	$	—
4.065% mortgage note due April 1, 2023, secured by one self-storage facility with an aggregate net book value of $7.6 million, principal and interest paid monthly (effective interest rate 4.23%)						4,207		—
5.26% mortgage note due November 1, 2023, secured by one self-storage facility with an aggregate net book value of $8.1 million, principal and interest paid monthly (effective interest rate 5.48%)						4,002		—
5.99% mortgage note due May 1, 2026, secured by one self-storage facility with an aggregate net book value of $4.2 million, principal and interest paid monthly (effective interest rate 6.21%)						1,852		1,993

Total mortgages payable	$	2,127	$	2,254	$	13,027	$	1,993

The table below summarizes the Company’s debt obligations and interest rate derivatives at December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and is dependent on a number of important assumptions, including discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The fair value of the fixed rate term notes and mortgage notes were estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. These assumptions are considered Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy as described in Note 9.8. The carrying values of our variable rate debt instruments approximate their fair values as these debt instruments bear interest at current market rates that approximate market participant rates. This is considered a Level 2 input within the fair value hierarchy. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange.

      Expected Maturity Date Including Discount
(dollars in thousands)
   2015    2016    2017    2018    2019    Thereafter    Total    Fair Value
Line of credit - variable rate LIBOR + 1.30% (1.46% at December 31, 2014)
   —      —      —         —      $ 49,000    —      $ 49,000       $ 49,000
Notes Payable:

Term note - fixed rate 6.38%
   —      $ 150,000       —         —      —      —      $ 150,000       $ 161,166
Term note - variable rate LIBOR+1.40% (1.56% at December 31, 2014)
   —      —      —      —      —      $ 325,000       $ 325,000       $ 325,000
Term note - fixed rate 5.54%
   —      —      —      —      —      $ 100,000       $ 100,000       $ 111,452
Term note - fixed rate 4.533%
   —      —      —      —      —      $ 175,000       $ 175,000       $ 181,331
Mortgage note - fixed rate 5.99%
   $ 134       $ 142    $ 151    $ 160    $ 170    $ 1,370       $ 2,127       $ 2,277
Interest rate derivatives – liability
   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      $ 13,341

Interest rate swaps are used to adjust the proportion of total debt that is subject to variable interest rates. The interest rate swaps require the Company to pay an amount equal to a specific fixed rate of interest times a notional principal amount and to receive in return an amount equal to a variable rate of interest times the same notional amount. The notional amounts are not exchanged. Forward starting interest rate swaps are also used by the Company to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the potential issuance of long-term debt. No other cash payments are made unless the contract is terminated prior to its maturity, in which case the contract would likely be settled for an amount equal to its fair value. The Company enters into interest rate swaps with a number of major financial institutions to minimize counterparty credit risk.

The interest rate swaps qualify and are designated as hedges of the amount of future cash flows related to interest payments on variable rate debt. Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in shareholders’ equity or partners’ capital as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCL”). These deferred gains and losses are recognized in interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings. However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately. Ineffectiveness was ~~deminimus~~de minimis in ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012.~~2014.

The Company has interest rate swap agreements in effect at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 as detailed below to effectively convert a total of $325 million of variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $50 million. In the first quarter of 2016, the Company entered into additional forward starting interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $100 million. These forward starting interest rate swap agreements were entered into to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash flows associated with the potential issuance of fixed rate long-term debt. In conjunction with the issuance of the 2026 Senior Notes (see Note 5), the Company terminated these hedges and settled the forward starting swap agreements for approximately $9.2 million. The $9.2 million has been deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized as additional interest expense over the ten-year term of the 2026 Senior Notes or until such time as interest payments on the 2026 Senior Notes are no longer probable. Approximately $0.5 million of interest expense was recorded in 2016 as a result of this amortization. Consistent with the Company’s accounting policy, the cash outflow related to the settlement of the forward starting swap agreements is reflected as a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

The interest rate swap agreements are the only derivative instruments, as defined by FASB ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, held by the Company. During ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, the net reclassification from AOCL to interest expense was ~~$5.5~~$4.6 million, ~~$5.3~~$5.2 million, and ~~$4.9~~$5.5 million, respectively, based on payments made under the swap agreements. Based on current interest rates, the Company estimates that payments under the interest rate swaps will be approximately ~~$5.5~~$4.0 million in ~~2015.~~2017. Payments made under the interest rate swap agreements will be reclassified to interest expense as settlements occur. The fair value of the swap agreements, including accrued interest, was a liability of ~~$13.3~~$13.0 million at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016 and an asset of ~~$0.8 million~~$550,000 and a liability of ~~$7.5~~$15.3 million at December 31, ~~2013.~~2015.

The Company’s agreements with its interest rate swap counterparties contain provisions pursuant to which the Company could be declared in default of its derivative obligations if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender. The interest rate swap agreements also incorporate other loan covenants of the Company. Failure to comply with the

loan covenant provisions would result in the Company being in default on the interest rate swap agreements. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company had not posted any collateral related to the interest rate swap agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their net termination value of ~~$13.3~~$13.0 million.

The changes in AOCL for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012~~2014 are summarized as follows:


(dollars in thousands)	Jan. 1, 2014 to Dec. 31, 2014			Jan. 1, 2013 to Dec. 31, 2013			Jan. 1, 2012 to Dec. 31, 2012			Jan. 1, 2016 to Dec. 31, 2016			Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2015			Jan. 1, 2014 to Dec. 31, 2014
Accumulated other comprehensive loss beginning of period	$	(6,402	)	$	(15,242	)	$	(10,255	)	$	(14,415	)	$	(13,005	)	$	(6,402	)
Realized loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense		5,506			5,299			4,889			5,044			5,229			5,506
Unrealized gain (loss) from changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the interest rate swaps		(12,109	)		3,541			(9,876	)
Unrealized loss from changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the interest rate swaps											(12,104	)		(6,639	)		(12,109	)

(Loss) gain included in other comprehensive loss		(6,603	)		8,840			(4,987	)
Loss included in other comprehensive loss											(7,060	)		(1,410	)		(6,603	)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss end of period	$	(13,005	)	$	(6,402	)	$	(15,242	)	$	(21,475	)	$	(14,415	)	$	(13,005	)

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” in determining the fair value of its financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. ASC Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

~~In May 2011 the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04,~~~~Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)~~ (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the IASB (the “Boards”) on fair value measurements. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this ASU were required to be applied prospectively, and were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 and its adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s current fair value measurements or disclosures. The adoption is not expected to have a significant effect on any future fair value measurements or disclosures.

Refer to Note 76 for presentation of the fair values of debt obligations which are disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, ~~2014 (in~~2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

Interest rate swaps are over the counter securities with no quoted readily available Level 1 inputs, and therefore are measured at fair value using inputs that are directly observable in active markets and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, using the income approach.

During ~~2014,~~2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis included the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition of 33122 storage facilities (see note 4)., including the LS acquisition. To determine the fair value of land, the Company used prices per acre derived from observed transactions involving comparable land in similar locations, which is considered a Level 2 input. To determine the fair value of buildings, equipment and improvements, the Company used current replacement cost based on information derived from construction industry data by geographic region which is considered a Level 2 input. The

replacement cost is then adjusted for the age, condition, and economic obsolescence associated with these assets, which are considered Level 3 inputs. The fair value of in-place customer leases is based on the rent lost due to the amount of time required to replace existing customers and the cost to replace in-place tenants which isare based on the Company’s historical experience with turnover at its facilities and on market rental rates and estimated downtime required to replace the in-place leases, all of which are Level 3 inputs. The average downtime is based upon estimated demand information including the number of potential customers exhibited in historical property interest data. The fair value of trade names is based on royalty payments avoided had the trade name been owned by a third party which is ~~a Level 3 input.~~determined using market royalty rates. Other assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisitions consist primarily of prepaid or accrued real estate taxes and deferred revenues from advance monthly rentals paid by customers. The fair values of these assets and liabilities are based on their carrying values as they typically turn over within one year from the acquisition date and these are Level 3 inputs.

The Company established the ~~2005~~2015 Award and Option Plan (the ~~“Plan”~~“2015 Plan”) which replaced the expired ~~1995~~2005 Award and Option Plan for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company’s executive officers and other key ~~employees. 1,500,000~~employees, such plans being the “Plans”. There were 561,000 shares ~~were~~ authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Options granted under the ~~Plan~~Plans vest ratably over four and eight years, and must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for qualified incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of the common shares at the date of grant. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, options for ~~82,606~~77,206 shares were outstanding under the Plans and options for ~~543,229~~435,570 shares of common stock were available for future issuance. The Company may also grant other stock-based awards under the 2015 Plan, including restricted stock and performance-based ~~vesting restricted stock~~ awards.

The Company also established the 2009 Outside Directors’ Stock Option and Award Plan (the “Non-employee Plan”) which replaced the 1995 Outside Directors’ Stock Option Plan for the purpose of attracting and retaining the services of experienced and knowledgeable outside directors. ~~The~~Prior to 2016, the Non-employee Plan ~~provides~~provided for the initial granting of options to purchase 3,500 shares of common stock and for the annual granting of options to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock to each eligible director. Such options vest over a one-year period for initial awards and immediately upon subsequent grants. The issuance of stock options to directors was discontinued in 2016. In addition, each outside director receives non-vested shares annually equal to 80% of the annual fees paid to them. During the restriction period, the non-vested shares may not be sold, transferred, or otherwise encumbered. The holder of the non-vested shares has all rights of a holder of common shares, including the right to vote and receive dividends. During ~~2014, 1,684~~2016, 1,864 non-vested shares were issued to outside directors. Such non-vested shares vest over a one-year period. The total shares reserved under the Non-employee Plan is 150,000. The exercise price for options granted under the Non-employee Plan is equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, options for ~~33,000~~18,500 common shares and ~~22,850~~16,984 of non-vested shares were outstanding under the Non-employee Plans. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 options for ~~84,855~~71,016 shares of common stock were available for future issuance.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31 follows:


	2014					2013					2012					2016				2015					2014
	Options			Weighted average exercise price		Options			Weighted average exercise price		Options			Weighted average exercise price		Options		Weighted average exercise price		Options			Weighted average exercise price		Options			Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at beginning of year:		130,568		$	44.82		273,248		$	43.45		364,268		$	42.76		95,706	$	52.08		115,606		$	48.54		130,568		$	44.82
Granted		14,000			76.01		8,000			69.90		9,500			49.42		—		—		11,000			91.58		14,000			76.01
Exercised		(27,462	)		45.34		(160,515	)		43.72		(91,520	)		40.82		—		—		(30,900	)		52.87		(27,462	)		45.34
Adjusted / (forfeited)		(1,500	)		40.07		9,835			36.37		(9,000	)		39.23		—		—		—			—		(1,500	)		40.07

Outstanding at end of year		115,606		$	48.54		130,568		$	44.82		273,248		$	43.45		95,706	$	52.08		95,706		$	52.08		115,606		$	48.54

Exercisable at end of year		67,316		$	49.18		60,382		$	46.85		165,667		$	44.56		92,706	$	51.31		63,815		$	48.73		67,316		$	49.18

A summary of the Company’s stock options outstanding at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 follows:

The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 ~~2013, and 2012,~~ was ~~$0.9 million, $3.6~~$0, $1.4 million, and ~~$1.1~~$0.9 million, respectively.

Proceeds from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012~~2014 amounted to ~~$1.2 million, $7.0~~$0, $1.6 million, and ~~$3.7~~$1.2 million, respectively.

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, or the price on the date of exercise for those exercised during the year. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, there was approximately ~~$0.2 million~~$22,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option compensation arrangements granted under our stock award plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~1.6~~1.5 years. The weighted average remaining contractual life of all options is ~~4.8~~2.9 years, and for exercisable options is ~~5.2~~2.8 years.

The Company has also issued shares of non-vested stock to employees which vest over one to nine year periods. During the restriction period, the non-vested shares may not be sold, transferred, or otherwise encumbered. The holder of the non-vested shares has all rights of a holder of common shares, including the right to vote and receive dividends. For issuances of non-vested stock during the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the fair market value of the non-vested stock on the date of grant ranged from ~~$46.95~~$82.52 to ~~$87.92.~~$117.27. During ~~2014, 92,665~~2016, 23,405 shares of

non-vested stock were issued to employees and directors with an aggregate fair value of ~~$5.6~~$2.1 million. The Company charges ~~additional paid-in capital for~~ the ~~market~~fair value ~~of shares as they are issued. The unearned portion is then amortized and charged~~ratably to expense over the vesting period. The Company uses the average of the high and low price of its common stock on the date the award is granted as the fair value for non-vested stock awards that ~~don’t~~do not have a market condition.

A summary of the status of unvested shares of stock issued to employees and directors as of and during the years ended December 31 follows:


	2014					2013					2012					2016					2015					2014
	Non-vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value		Non-vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value		Non-vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value		Non-vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value		Non-vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value		Non- vested Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value
Unvested at beginning of year:		293,196		$	49.20		187,535		$	37.36		246,634		$	37.93		305,520		$	59.09		310,463		$	51.93		293,196		$	49.20
Granted		92,665			60.87		189,080			54.78		2,592			49.42		23,405			89.30		64,665			94.74		92,665			60.87
Vested		(72,876	)		53.11		(83,419	)		35.28		(60,912	)		40.13		(70,762	)		69.82		(69,187	)		60.28		(72,876	)		53.11
Forfeited		(2,522	)		28.66		—			—		(779	)		41.07		—			—		(421	)		76.07		(2,522	)		28.66

Unvested at end of year		310,463		$	51.93		293,196		$	49.20		187,535		$	37.36		258,163		$	58.89		305,520		$	59.09		310,463		$	51.93

Compensation expense of ~~$4.6~~$7.2 million, ~~$2.9~~$6.3 million, and ~~$2.4~~$4.6 million was recognized for the vested portion of non-vested stock grants in ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, respectively. The fair value of non-vested stock that vested during 2016, 2015, and 2014 ~~2013 and 2012~~ was ~~$3.9~~$4.9 million, ~~$2.9~~$4.2 million, and ~~$2.4~~$3.9 million, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock was ~~$14.1~~$9.6 million at December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, and the remaining weighted-average period over which this expense will be recognized was ~~2.7~~3.4 years.

During 2016 and 2015, the Company granted performance-based awards that entitle the recipients to earn up to 37,082 and 42,538 shares, respectively, if certain performance criteria are achieved over a three year period. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined at the end of a three year period, and no performance-based shares were issued in 2016 or 2015. The Company granted and issued a total of 60,654 performance shares under the Plan during 2014 which are included in the table above. ~~In 2013, the Company granted 87,040 performance shares under the Plan which are also included above. Performance shares~~The performance-based awards granted are based upon the Company’s performance over a three year period depending on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a group of peer companies. Performance based ~~nonvested shares~~awards are recognized as compensation expense based on fair value on date of grant, the number of shares ultimately expected to vest and the vesting period. For accounting purposes, the performance shares are considered to have a market condition. The effect of the market condition is reflected in the grant date fair value of the award and thus, compensation expense is recognized on this type of award provided that the requisite service is rendered (regardless of whether the market condition is achieved). The Company estimated the fair value of each ~~performance share~~performance-based award granted under the ~~Plan~~Plans on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation that uses the assumptions noted in Note 2.

During ~~2014,~~2016, compensation expense of ~~$1.2~~$2.6 million (included in the ~~$4.6~~$7.2 million discussed above) was recognized for ~~the~~ performance ~~shares~~awards granted in ~~2011, 2013~~2014 and ~~2014.~~prior. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance ~~shares~~awards was ~~$4.7~~$3.9 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and the weighted-average period over which this expense will be recognized is ~~2.4~~1.6 years.

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, non-employee Directors may defer all or part of their Directors’ fees that are otherwise payable in cash. Directors’ fees that are deferred under this plan are credited to each Directors’ account under the plan in the form of Units. The number of Units credited is determined by dividing the amount of Directors’ fees deferred by the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the day immediately preceding the day upon which Directors’ fees otherwise would be paid by the Company. A Director is credited with additional Units for dividends on the shares of Common Stock

represented by Units in such Directors’ Account. A Director may elect to receive the shares in a lump sum on a date specified by the Director or in quarterly or annual installments over a specified period and commencing on a specified date. The Directors may not elect to receive cash in lieu of shares. Under this plan there were a total of ~~45,505~~20,513 units outstanding at December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. Fees that were earned and credited to Directors’ accounts are recorded as compensation expense which totaled $0.1 million ~~$0.1 million~~annually in each of 2016, 2015, and ~~$0.1 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.~~2014.

Employees of the Company qualifying under certain age and service requirements are eligible to be a participant in a
401(k) Plan. ~~The~~In 2015 and 2014, the Company ~~contributes~~contributed to the Plan at the rate of 25% of the first 4% of gross wages that the employee contributes. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the Company contributes to the Plan at the rate of 33% of the first 5% of gross wages that the employee contributes. Total expense to the Company was approximately ~~$192,000, $78,000,~~$505,000, $276,000, and ~~$69,000~~$192,000 for the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013~~2016, 2015 and ~~2012,~~2014, respectively.

The Company has a 20% ownership interest in Sovran HHF Storage Holdings LLC (“Sovran HHF”), a joint venture that ~~was formed in May 2008 to acquire~~owns 39 self-storage properties that are managed by the Company. The carrying value of the Company’s investment at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 was ~~$45.2~~$43.8 million and ~~$17.4~~$44.6 million, respectively. Twenty-five properties were acquired by Sovran HHF in 2008 for approximately $171.5 million and 14 additional properties were acquired by Sovran HHF in 2014 for $187.2 million. In 2008, the Company contributed $18.6 million to the joint venture as its share of capital required to fund the acquisitions. In 2012 the Company contributed an additional $1.2 million to the joint venture. In 2013 the Company received a return of capital distribution of $3.4 million as part of the refinancing of Sovran HHF. In 2014, the Company contributed ~~an additional~~ $28.6 million in cash to the joint venture as its share of capital required to fund property acquisitions. In 2015 the Company contributed an additional $0.4 million in cash to the joint venture as its share of capital required to fund certain capital expenditures and property taxes related to 2014 acquisitions. As of

December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the carrying value of the Company’s investment in Sovran HHF exceeds its share of the underlying equity in net assets of Sovran HHF by approximately $1.7 million as a result of the capitalization of certain acquisition related costs in 2008. This difference is included in the carrying value of the investment, which is assessed for other-than-temporary impairment on a periodic basis. No other-than-temporary impairments have been recorded on this investment.

The Company has a 15% ownership interest in Sovran HHF Storage Holdings II LLC (“Sovran HHF II”), a joint venture that ~~was formed in 2011 to acquire~~owns 30 self-storage properties that are managed by the Company. The carrying value of the Company’s investment at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 was ~~$12.6~~$13.5 million and ~~$13.0,~~$13.9 million, respectively. ~~Twenty properties were acquired by Sovran HHF II during 2011 for approximately $166.1 million. During 2011,~~In 2015 the Company contributed ~~$12.8~~$1.7 million in cash to the joint venture as its share of capital required to fund the ~~acquisitions. Ten additional properties were acquired by Sovran HHF II during 2012 for approximately $29 million. During 2012, the Company contributed $2.4 million to the joint venture as its share~~payoff of ~~capital required to fund the acquisitions.~~a mortgage note. The carrying value of this investment is assessed for other-than-temporary impairment on a periodic basis and no such impairments have been recorded on this investment.

As manager of Sovran HHF and Sovran HHF II, the Company earns a management and call center fee of 7% of gross revenues which totaled $4.9 million, $4.9 million, and $3.9 million ~~$3.4 million,~~for 2016, 2015, and ~~$3.0 million for~~ 2014, ~~2013, and 2012,~~ respectively. The Company also received an acquisition fee of $0.4 ~~million and $0.1~~ million for securing purchases for Sovran HHF and Sovran HHF II in ~~2014 and 2012, respectively.~~2014. The Company’s share of Sovran HHF and Sovran HHF II’s income for 2016, 2015, and 2014 ~~2013 and 2012~~ was ~~$1.9~~$3.4 million, ~~$1.9~~$3.2 million, and ~~$0.9~~$1.9 million, respectively.

The Company ~~also~~ has a 49% ownership interest in Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, which owns the building that houses the Company’s headquarters and other tenants. The carrying value of the Company’s investment is a liability of ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million and $0.5 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013,~~2015, respectively, and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012,~~2014, the Company’s share of Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC’s income ~~(loss)~~ was ~~$107,000, $59,000,~~$214,000, $189,000, and ~~($18,000),~~$107,000, respectively. The Company paid rent to Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC of $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million ~~$0.8~~in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

The Company holds an 85% equity interest in Urban Box Coralway Storage, LLC (Urban Box), a joint venture with an unrelated third party. Urban Box was formed in 2015 and is currently developing a self-storage property in Florida. During 2015, the Company contributed $4.0 million to Urban Box as its share of capital to develop the property, which primarily consists of the acquisition of land in 2015. In 2016, Urban Box entered into a non-recourse mortgage loan in order to finance future development costs. The Company and the other joint venture member have participation rights which require the agreement of both members in order to implement the activities of Urban Box which are most significant to its economic performance. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for by the Company using the equity method.

The Company will perform property management services for Urban Box in exchange for a management fee based on 6% of property revenues. There were no management fees in 2016 or 2015.

The Company holds a 5% equity interest in SNL/Orix 1200 McDonald Ave., LLC (“McDonald”), a joint venture with an unrelated third party. The joint venture for McDonald was executed in 2016 and is currently developing a self-storage property in New York. During 2016, the Company contributed $0.4 million of common capital and $2.3 million of preferred capital to McDonald as its share of capital to develop the property. McDonald entered into a non-recourse mortgage loan in order to finance the future development costs. In accordance with the terms of the McDonald joint venture agreement, the Company has the ability to assert influence over certain business matters. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for by the Company using the equity method.

The Company will perform property management services for McDonald in exchange for a management fee based on property revenues. There were no management fees in 2016.

The Company holds a 5% equity interest in SNL Orix Merrick, LLC (“Merrick”), a joint venture with an unrelated third party. The joint venture for Merrick was executed in 2016 and is currently developing a self-storage property in New York. During 2016, the Company contributed $0.4 million of common capital and $2.1 million of preferred capital to Merrick as its share of capital to develop the property. Merrick will enter into a non-recourse mortgage loan in order to finance the future development costs. In accordance with the terms of the Merrick joint venture agreement, the Company has the ability to assert influence over certain business matters. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for by the Company using the equity method.

The Company will perform property management services for Merrick in exchange for a management fee based on property revenues. There were no management fees in 2016.

The Company holds a 20% ownership interest in 191 III Holdings LLC (“191 III”), a joint venture that was formed in 2016 to acquire self-storage properties that are managed by the Company. During 2016, the Company contributed $0.7 million to 191 III as its share of capital to fund future acquisitions. In accordance with the terms of the 191 III joint venture agreement, the Company has the ability to assert influence over certain business matters. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for by the Company using the equity method.

The Company will perform property management and call center services for 191 III in ~~2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.~~exchange for an aggregate fee based on 7% of the gross revenues of the joint venture. There were no management fees in 2016.

A summary of the combined unconsolidated joint ventures’ financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 is as follows:


(dollars in thousands)	Sovran HHF Storage Holdings LLC			Sovran HHF Storage Holdings II LLC			Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC
Balance Sheet Data:
Investment in storage facilities, net	$	341,817		$	185,214		$	—		$	534,719
Investment in office building		—			—			5,005			5,008
Other assets		5,408			3,711			3,386			17,440

Total Assets	$	347,225		$	188,925		$	8,391		$	557,167

Due to the Company	$	260		$	333		$	—		$	1,223
Mortgages payable		124,888			102,884			9,267			220,456
Other liabilities		4,651			1,792			402			7,394

Total Liabilities		129,799			105,009			9,669			229,073
Unaffiliated partners’ equity											262,944
Company equity											65,150

Unaffiliated partners’ equity (deficiency)		173,941			71,335			(729	)
Company equity (deficiency)		43,485			12,581			(549	)
Total Partners’ Equity											328,094

Total Partners’ Equity (Deficiency)		217,426			83,916			(1,278	)

Total Liabilities and Partners’ Equity (Deficiency)	$	347,225		$	188,925		$	8,391
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Equity										$	557,167

Income Statement Data:
Total revenues	$	26,508		$	28,502		$	1,405		$	74,034
Property operating expenses		(8,336	)		(9,809	)		(571	)		(23,879	)
Administrative, management and call center fees		(1,954	)		(2,113	)		—			(5,389	)
Acquisition costs		(1,837	)		—			—
Depreciation and amortization of customer list		(5,099	)		(4,163	)		(236	)		(13,946	)
Amortization of financing fees		(190	)		(203	)		(14	)		(354	)
Income tax expense		(151	)		(461	)		—			(232	)
Interest expense		(4,475	)		(5,142	)		(365	)		(10,258	)

Net income	$	4,466		$	6,611		$	219		$	19,976

The Company does not guarantee the debt of Sovran HHF, Sovran HHF II, or Iskalo Office Holdings, ~~LLC.~~LLC, Urban Box, McDonald, Merrick, or 191 III.

We do not expect to have material future cash outlays relating to these joint ventures outside our share of capital for future acquisitions of properties. A summary of our revenues, expenses and cash flows arising from the off-balance sheet arrangements with Sovran HHF, Sovran HHF II, ~~and~~ Iskalo Office Holdings, LLC, Urban Box, McDonald, Merrick, and 191 III for the three years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 are as follows:

On May 25, 2016, the Company completed the public offering of 6,900,000 shares of its common stock at $100.00 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were approximately $665.4 million. The Company initially used the net proceeds from the offering to repay the indebtedness then outstanding on the Company’s unsecured line of credit. The proceeds from this offering and the proceeds from the 2026 Senior Notes (see Note 5) were used, along with draws on the Company’s revolving line of credit, to fund the purchase of LS on July 15, 2016 (see Note 4).

On May 12, 2014, the Company entered into a continuous equity offering program (“Equity Program”) with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“Wells Fargo”), Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (“SunTrust”), Piper Jaffray & Co. (“Piper”), HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. (“HSBC”), and BB&T Capital Markets, a division of BB&T Securities, LLC (“BB&T”), pursuant to which the Company may sell from time to time up to $225 million in aggregate offering price of shares of the Company’s common stock. Actual sales under the Equity Program will depend on a variety of factors and conditions, including, but not limited to, market conditions, the trading price of the Company’s common stock, and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for the Company. The Company expects to continue to offer, sell, and issue shares of common stock under the Equity Program from time to time based on various factors and conditions, although the Company is under no obligation to sell any shares under the Equity Program.

During 2016, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock under the Equity Program. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $59.3 million available for issuance under the Equity Program which expires in May 2017.

During 2015, the Company issued 949,911 shares of common stock under the Equity Program at a weighted average issue price of $96.80 per share, generating net proceeds of $90.6 million after deducting $1.1 million of sales commissions paid to Jefferies, Piper, and HSBC, as well as other expenses of $0.2 million. The Company used the proceeds from the equity programs to fund a portion of the acquisition of 27 storage facilities.

During 2014, the Company issued 924,403 shares of common stock under the Equity Program at a weighted average issue price of $79.77 per share, generating net proceeds of $72.8 million after deducting $0.9 million of sales commissions paid to Piper, HSBC and BB&T. ~~As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $151.3 million available for issuance under the Equity Program.~~

In addition to sales commissions, the Company incurred expenses of $0.2 million in connection with these equity programs during 2014. The Company used the proceeds from the equity programs to fund a portion of the acquisition of 33 storage facilities.

In 2013, the Company implemented a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The Company issued ~~171,854~~133,666 and 151,246 shares under the plan in ~~2014.~~2016 and 2015, respectively.

The following is a summary of quarterly results of Life Storage Inc. operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):


	2014 Quarter Ended								2016 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30		Sept. 30		Dec. 31		Mar. 31		Jun. 30		Sept. 30			Dec. 31
Operating revenue	$	75,457	$	80,444	$	85,249	$	84,930	$	99,124	$	107,005	$	127,801		$	128,678
Income from continuing operations		16,775		20,701		25,743		25,838
Income from discontinued operations		—		—		—		—
Net Income		16,775		20,701		25,743		25,838
Net income attributable to common shareholders		16,673		20,576		25,589		25,693
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders
Net income (loss)										28,230		43,504		(4,969	)		18,191
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders										28,339		43,456		(4,738	)		18,168
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders
Basic	$	0.51	$	0.63	$	0.77	$	0.76	$	0.74	$	1.04	$	(0.10	)	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.51	$	0.62	$	0.77	$	0.76	$	0.73	$	1.03	$	(0.10	)	$	0.39

									2015 Quarter Ended
									Mar. 31		Jun. 30		Sept. 30			Dec. 31
Operating revenue									$	85,408	$	90,726	$	95,428		$	95,040
Net income										22,557		28,676		31,661			30,183
Net income attributable to common shareholders										22,451		28,532		31,504			30,037
Net income per share attributable to common shareholders
Basic									$	0.65	$	0.81	$	0.88		$	0.83
Diluted									$	0.65	$	0.80	$	0.88		$	0.83

   2013 Quarter Ended
   March 31    June 30    Sept. 30    Dec. 31
Operating revenue (a)
   $ 63,878    $ 67,109    $ 70,455    $ 72,065
Income from continuing operations (a)
   14,204    17,816    19,552    19,900
Income from discontinued operations (a)
   168    236    247    2,472
Net Income
   14,372    18,052    19,799    22,371
Net income attributable to common shareholders
   14,280    17,937    19,675    22,234
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders

Basic
   $ 0.47    $ 0.57    $ 0.63    $ 0.70
Diluted
   $ 0.47    $ 0.57    $ 0.62    $ 0.69

The following is a summary of quarterly results of Life Storage LP operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

~~15.~~See note 4 for a discussion of property acquisitions made during 2016 and the depreciation resulting from the change in estimated useful lives of Uncle Bob’s Self Storage^® signage. See note 6 for financing transactions entered into in 2016.

The Company’s current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. At this time, the Company is not aware of any environmental contamination of any of its facilities that individually or in the aggregate would be material to the Company’s overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Future minimum lease payments on ~~the lease of the four storage facilities,~~ a building lease and the lease of the Company’s headquarters are as follows (dollars in thousands):

On November 1, 2013, the Company completed certain transactions with respect to the lease of four self storage facilities in New York and Connecticut with annual lease payments of $6 million with a provision for 4% annual increases, and an exclusive option to purchase the facilities for $120 million. The leases commenced November 1, 2013 and run through December 31, 2028. The Company has an option to purchase the facilities during the period from February 2, 2015 through September 2, 2016. The operating results of the leased facilities have been included in the Company’s operations since November 1, 2013. On November 10, 2014, the Company exercised its option to purchase the facilities and the purchase transaction closed on February 2, 2015.

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company was under contract to acquire ~~seven~~five self-storage facilities for cash consideration of approximately ~~$143.7~~$67.0 million. ~~Five~~One of the properties ~~were~~was acquired in February ~~2015~~2017 from an unrelated ~~parties~~party for ~~$126.8 million, which included the four properties operated by the Company under a lease agreement.~~$9.8 million. The Company has not yet determined the assignment of the purchase ~~prices~~price of ~~these five facilities~~this facility to the individual assets acquired. ~~These acquisitions were~~This acquisition was funded with ~~draws~~a draw on the Company’s revolving line of credit. ~~The line of credit balance outstanding after the funding of the five acquisitions was $187 million.~~ The following is a summary of the ~~2015 acquisitions~~properties under contract at December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):.

The purchase of the remaining facilities by the Company is subject to customary conditions to closing, and there is no assurance that these facilities will be acquired.

At December 31, 2016, 191 III was under contract to acquire five self-storage facilities for cash consideration of $109.5 million. Four of these facilities were acquired by 191 III in January 2017. The Company’s cash contribution to 191 III for the purchase of the four facilities was approximately $15.0 million. 191 III is under contract to purchase the remaining facility for $32.3 million of which the company is committed to contribute $6.5 million. The purchase of this remaining facility by 191 III is subject to customary conditions to closing, and there is no assurance that this facility will be acquired.

At December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company has signed contracts in place with third party contractors for expansion and enhancements at its existing facilities. The Company expects to pay ~~$10.1~~$11.6 million under these contracts in ~~2015.~~2017.

On January ~~5, 2015,~~4, 2017, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of ~~$0.75~~$0.95 per common share. The dividend was paid on January 26, ~~2015~~2017 to shareholders of record on January ~~16, 2015.~~17, 2017. The total dividend paid amounted to ~~$25.5~~$44.1 million.

In January 2017, the Company executed a joint venture agreement, Review Avenue Partners, LLC (“RAP”), with an unrelated third party. The Company holds a 40% interest in RAP and contributed $12.4 million of common capital to RAP on January 4, 2017. RAP is currently operating a self-storage property in New York and has entered into a non-recourse mortgage loan to finance a portion of the cost of the facility. The Company will perform property management services for RAP in exchange for a management fee based on property revenues.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

~~Our~~The Parent Company’s management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of ~~our~~the Parent Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), under the supervision of and with the participation of ~~our~~the Parent Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, ~~our~~the Parent Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that ~~our~~the Parent Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, ~~2014.~~2016. There have not been changes in the Parent Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2016.

Management’s Report on Life Storage, Inc. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~Our management~~Management of Life Storage, Inc. (the “REIT”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014. Internal~~2016. The REIT’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. ~~Our~~The REIT’s system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the ~~company;~~REIT; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the ~~company~~REIT are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the ~~company;~~REIT; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the ~~Company’s~~REIT’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

~~Our~~The REIT’s management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of ~~our~~the REIT’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 based upon criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~(1992~~(2013 Framework) ~~(‘‘COSO’’~~(“COSO”). Based on our assessment, management determined that ~~our~~the REIT’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 based on the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

The effectiveness of the ~~Company’s~~REIT’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Item 9A herein.

We have audited ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~(1992~~(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Life Storage, Inc. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 of ~~Sovran Self~~Life Storage, Inc. and our report dated February ~~24, 2015~~27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The Operating Partnership’s management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), under the supervision of and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, 2016. There have not been changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls during the quarter ended December 31, 2016.

Management’s Report on Life Storage LP Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Life Storage LP (the “Partnership”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Partnership’s system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Partnership; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Partnership’s management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based upon criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (“COSO”). Based on our assessment, management determined that the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016 based on the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

The effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Item 9A herein.

We have audited Life Storage LP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Life Storage LP’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Life Storage LP Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

In our opinion, Life Storage LP maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria~~Item 9B. OtherInformation~~.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Life Storage LP as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 of Life Storage LP and our report dated February 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The information contained in ~~our~~the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement for the ~~2015~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 (“~~2015~~2017 Proxy Statement”), with respect to directors, executive officers, audit committee, and audit committee financial experts of the Company and Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees. The Company has made the Code of Ethics available on its website at http://~~www.unclebobs.com.~~www.lifestorage.com.

The information required is incorporated by reference to “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the ~~2015~~2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required herein is incorporated by reference to “Stock Ownership By Directors and Executive Officers” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in the ~~2015~~2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required herein is incorporated by reference to “Certain Transactions” and “Election of Directors—Director Independence” in the ~~2015~~2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required herein is incorporated by reference to “Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the ~~2015~~2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.



	The following consolidated financial statements of Life Storage LP are included in Item 8.

	(i)	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

	(ii)	Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.

	(iii)	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.

	(iv)	Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.

	(v)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 and

	(vi)	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2.	The following financial statement Schedule as of the period ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2016.

All other Consolidated financial schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been included as follows:



3.10		Amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership dated July ~~17, 2012)~~30, 1999 and July 3, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Parent Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009).

3.11		Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016).

4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-91422) filed June 19, 1995).

~~10.1+~~4.2		Base Indenture, dated as of June 20, 2016, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2016).

~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~ 4.3		First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 20, 2016, among the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2016).

4.4		Form of Note representing the Notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2016).

4.5		Form of Guarantee (included in Exhibit 4.4).

10.1*+		2015 Award and Option Plan, as amended.

10.2+		2005 Award and Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~the Registrant’s~~Parent Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed February 28, 2012).

~~10.2+~~		~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 1995 Outside Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2010).~~

10.3+		Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, and Robert J. Attea (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009).

10.4+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Robert J. Attea (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015).

~~10.5+~~10.5*+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Robert J Attea.

10.6+		Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, and Kenneth F. Myszka (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009).


~~10.6+~~10.7+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, and Kenneth F. Myszka (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015).

~~10.7+~~10.8*+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Kenneth J. Myszka.

10.9+		Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, and David L. Rogers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009).

~~10.8+~~10.10+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and David L. Rogers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2015).



~~10.9+~~10.11*+		Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and David L. Rogers.

10.12+		Form of restricted stock grant pursuant to ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~the 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Parent Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed February 28, 2012).

~~10.10+~~10.13+		Form of stock option grant pursuant to ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~ 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Parent Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed February 28, 2012).

~~10.11+~~10.14+		Form of restricted stock grant pursuant to Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 and Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 6, 2013).

~~10.12+~~		Form of Long Term Incentive Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~the 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2013).

~~10.13+~~10.15+		Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~the 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2013).

~~10.14+~~10.16+		Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (incorporated by reference to the Parent Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement filed April ~~10, 2008)~~8, 2015).

~~10.15~~10.17		Amended Indemnification Agreements with members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 and 10.36 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 20, 2006, SEC File Number 001-13820, Film Number 06971617).

~~10.16~~		~~Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10 filed April 22, 1998).~~

~~10.17~~		Amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership dated July 30, 1999 and July 3, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 27, 2009).

10.18		Sixth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated as of December 10, 2014 among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and certain other lenders a party thereto or which may become a party thereto (collectively, the “Lenders”), Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, as administrative agent for itself and the other Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, PNC Bank, National Association, and SunTrust Bank as co-documentation agents, for themselves and the other Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Registrant’s~~Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2014).


10.19		Agreement Regarding Revolving Credit Commitment Increases andFirst Amendment to Credit Agreement dated January 4, 2016 among the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, as Administrative Agent, and various other financial institutions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 4, 2016).

10.20		Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 5, 2011 among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and the institutions named in Schedule A thereto as purchasers of $100 million, 5.54% Senior Guaranteed Notes, Series D due August 5, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 8, 2011).

~~10.20~~		$150 million, 6.38% Senior Guaranteed Notes, Series C due April 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 1, 2006, SEC File Number 001-13820, Film Number 06795352).

10.21		Note Purchase Agreement dated as of April 8, 2014 among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and the institutions named in Schedule A thereto as purchasers of $175 million, 4.533% Senior Guaranteed Notes, Series E due April 8, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 9, 2014).

10.22		~~Lease~~Amendment No. 2 to Note Purchase Agreement (2011) dated June 29, 2016 by and ~~between Sovran Acquisition Limited~~among the Parent Company, and the Operating Partnership ~~as lessee,~~ and ~~Carlos A. Arredondo, as lessor, dated as of August 7, 2013 with respect~~the Required Holders (incorporated by reference to ~~certain property in Milford, Connecticut, as amended by a First Amendment of Lease dated September 13, 2013.~~Exhibit 10.1 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 6, 2016).



10.23		~~Lease~~Amendment No. 2 to Note Purchase Agreement (2014) dated June 29, 2016 by and ~~between Sovran Acquisition Limited~~among the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership ~~as lessee,~~ and ~~various trustees of trusts for~~ the ~~benefit of~~Required Holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the ~~descendants of Carlos A. Arredondo~~Parent Company and certain other parties, as lessor, with respect to certain property in Farmingdale, New York, as amended by a First Amendment of Lease dated September 13, 2013 and a Second Amendment of Lease dated as of September 27, 2013.the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 6, 2016).

10.24		~~Lease~~Note Purchase Agreement dated as of July 21, 2016 among the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership and the institutions named in Schedule A thereto as purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Parent Company and ~~between Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, as lessee, and various trustees of trusts for~~ the benefit of the descendants of Carlos A. Arredondo and certain other parties, as lessor, with respect to certain property in Danbury, Connecticut, as amended by a First Amendment of Lease dated September 13, 2013.Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2016).

10.25		Lease by and between Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, as lessee, and various trustees of trusts for the benefit of the descendants of Carlos A. Arredondo and certain other parties, as lessor, with respect to certain property in Hicksville, New York, as amended by a First Amendment of Lease dated September 13, 2013 and a Second Amendment of Lease dated as of September 27, 2013.

~~10.26~~		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc., (n/k/a Life Storage Holdings, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

10.26		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc. (n/k/a Life Storage Holdings, Inc.), and Jefferies LLC, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

10.27		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc. (n/k/a Life Storage Holdings, Inc.), and ~~Jefferies LLC,~~SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~1.2~~1.3 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

10.28		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc. (n/k/a Life Storage Holdings, Inc.), and ~~SunTrust Robinson Humphrey,~~Piper Jaffray & Co., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~1.3~~1.4 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

10.29		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc.~~, and Piper Jaffray & Co, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).~~


~~10.30~~		~~Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among Sovran Self~~ (n/k/a Life Storage ~~Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership, Sovran~~ Holdings, Inc.), and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.5 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

~~10.31~~10.30		Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of May 12, 2014 by and among ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership, Sovran Holdings, Inc. (n/k/a Life Storage Holdings, Inc.), and BB&T Capital Markets, a division of BB&T Securities, LLC, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2014).

~~10.32~~10.31+		Indemnification Agreement dated September 25, 2009 between Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited Partnership and James R. Boldt, a director of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2009).

~~10.33+~~		~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~ 2009 Outside Directors Stock Option and Award Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to ~~Registrant’s Proxy Statement~~Exhibit 10.2 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April ~~9, 2009)~~6, 2016).

~~10.34+~~10.32+		Outside Director Fee Schedule (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed ~~November 5, 2010)~~April 6, 2016).

~~10.35+~~10.33+		~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~ Annual Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 21, 2012).

~~10.36+~~10.34+		Employment Agreement between ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Andrew Gregoire amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2012).



~~10.37+~~10.35+		Employment Agreement between ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Paul Powell amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2012).

~~10.38+~~10.36+		Employment Agreement between ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc., Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Edward Killeen amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2012).

~~10.39~~10.37		Indemnification Agreement dated July 16, 2012 between ~~Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Stephen R. Rusmisel, a director of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 17, 2012).

~~10.40~~10.38		Indemnification Agreement dated January 30, 2015 between ~~Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Arthur L. Havener, Jr., a director of the Parent Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2015).

~~10.41~~10.39		Indemnification Agreement dated January 30, 2015 between ~~Registrant, Sovran Acquisition Limited~~the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and Mark G. Barberio, a director of the Parent Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2015).

~~10.42+~~10.40+		Form of Long Term Incentive Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to ~~Sovran Self Storage, Inc.~~ 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ~~Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2014).~~


~~10.43+~~		~~Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to Sovran Self Storage, Inc. 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2014).

10.41+		Form of Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to 2005 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2014).

10.42+		Form of Long Term Incentive Restricted Stock Award Notice pursuant to 2015 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2015).

10.43+		Form of Performance-Based Award Notice pursuant to 2015 Award and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2015).

10.44		Form of Long Term Incentive Restricted Stock Award Notice (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 28, 2016).

10.45		Form of Performance-Based Award Notice (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 28, 2016).

10.46		Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Life Storage, L.P., the Operating Partnership, Solar Lunar Sub, LLC, and Fortis Advisors LLC, as Sellers’ Representative dated as of May 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2016).

12.1*		Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to Fixed ~~Charges.~~Charges of Life Storage, Inc. and Life Storage LP

21.1*		Subsidiaries of the Company.

23.1*		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting ~~Firm.~~Firm

23.2*		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24.1*		Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages).

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Life Storage, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.



31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Life Storage LP pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.231.3		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Life Storage LP pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.4*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Life Storage LP pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Life Storage, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Life Storage, Inc. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*		The following financial statements from the ~~Company’s~~Life Storage, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2016, formatted in XBRL, as follows:

		(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, ~~2014~~2016 and ~~2013;~~2015; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012;~~2014; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Years Ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012.~~2014. (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for Years Ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012;~~2014; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, ~~2014, 2013,~~2016, 2015, and ~~2012;~~2014; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

		The following financial statements from the Life Storage LP.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL, as follows: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014. (iv) Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014; and

		(vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

*		Filed herewith.

+		Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

		Not applicable.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


																								Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period														Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	Encum brance	Land		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Land		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Total		Accum. Deprec.		Date of Const.	Date Acquired		Life on which depr in latest income statement is computed		ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Charleston	SC		$	416	$	1,516	$	2,194	$	416	$	3,710	$	4,126	$	1,378	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	SC		$	416	$	1,516	$	2,350	$	416	$	3,866	$	4,282	$	1,585	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Lakeland	FL			397		1,424		1,626		397		3,050		3,447		1,128	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			397		1,424		1,696		397		3,120		3,517		1,293	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Charlotte	NC			308		1,102		3,394		747		4,057		4,804		1,016	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NC			308		1,102		3,508		747		4,171		4,918		1,256	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Youngstown	OH			239		1,110		2,444		239		3,554		3,793		1,112	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	OH			239		1,110		2,531		239		3,641		3,880		1,329	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Cleveland	OH			701		1,659		1,408		1,036		2,732		3,768		1,198	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	OH			701		1,659		3,808		1,036		5,132		6,168		1,403	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pt. St. Lucie	FL			395		1,501		978		779		2,095		2,874		1,091	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			395		1,501		1,063		779		2,180		2,959		1,211	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Orlando - Deltona	FL			483		1,752		2,223		483		3,975		4,458		1,567	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			483		1,752		2,287		483		4,039		4,522		1,799	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Middletown	NY			224		808		957		224		1,765		1,989		845	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
NY Metro-Middletown																						NY			224		808		1,080		224		1,888		2,112		940	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Buffalo	NY			423		1,531		3,451		497		4,908		5,405		1,715	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NY			423		1,531		3,477		497		4,934		5,431		1,946	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Rochester	NY			395		1,404		613		395		2,017		2,412		986	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NY			395		1,404		661		395		2,065		2,460		1,120	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville	FL			152		728		3,846		687		4,039		4,726		860	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			152		728		3,898		687		4,091		4,778		1,119	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Columbia	SC			268		1,248		637		268		1,885		2,153		904	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	SC			268		1,248		777		268		2,025		2,293		1,020	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Boston	MA			363		1,679		791		363		2,470		2,833		1,145	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MA			363		1,679		854		363		2,533		2,896		1,282	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Rochester	NY			230		847		2,237		234		3,080		3,314		679	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NY			230		847		2,323		234		3,166		3,400		862	1980		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Boston	MA			680		1,616		600		680		2,216		2,896		1,074	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MA			680		1,616		874		680		2,490		3,170		1,199	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Savannah	GA			463		1,684		4,915		1,445		5,617		7,062		1,949	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			463		1,684		4,937		1,445		5,639		7,084		2,298	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Greensboro	NC			444		1,613		2,990		444		4,603		5,047		1,464	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NC			444		1,613		3,209		444		4,822		5,266		1,719	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC			649		2,329		1,375		649		3,704		4,353		1,608	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NC			649		2,329		1,446		649		3,775		4,424		1,806	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Hartford-New Haven	CT			387		1,402		3,911		387		5,313		5,700		1,179	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	CT			387		1,402		3,971		387		5,373		5,760		1,452	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			844		2,021		914		844		2,935		3,779		1,370	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			844		2,021		972		844		2,993		3,837		1,515	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			302		1,103		640		303		1,742		2,045		808	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			302		1,103		684		303		1,786		2,089		899	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Buffalo	NY			315		745		3,962		517		4,505		5,022		1,062	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NY			315		745		4,039		517		4,582		5,099		1,307	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC			321		1,150		778		321		1,928		2,249		912	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	NC			321		1,150		861		321		2,011		2,332		1,029	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Columbia	SC			361		1,331		774		374		2,092		2,466		1,036	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	SC			361		1,331		924		374		2,242		2,616		1,168	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Columbia	SC			189		719		1,138		189		1,857		2,046		851	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	SC			189		719		1,192		189		1,911		2,100		975	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Columbia	SC			488		1,188		1,942		488		3,130		3,618		981	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	SC			488		1,188		2,097		488		3,285		3,773		1,169	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			430		1,579		2,245		602		3,652		4,254		1,331	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			430		1,579		2,323		602		3,730		4,332		1,511	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Orlando	FL			513		1,930		764		513		2,694		3,207		1,340	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			513		1,930		813		513		2,743		3,256		1,483	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Sharon	PA			194		912		560		194		1,472		1,666		700	1975		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	PA			194		912		572		194		1,484		1,678		776	1975		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Ft. Lauderdale	FL			1,503		3,619		1,012		1,503		4,631		6,134		2,003	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			1,503		3,619		1,233		1,503		4,852		6,355		2,253	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
West Palm	FL			398		1,035		392		398		1,427		1,825		765	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			398		1,035		502		398		1,537		1,935		851	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			423		1,015		533		424		1,547		1,971		770	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			423		1,015		574		424		1,588		2,012		861	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			483		1,166		1,171		483		2,337		2,820		959	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			483		1,166		1,253		483		2,419		2,902		1,102	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			308		1,116		718		308		1,834		2,142		939	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			308		1,116		794		308		1,910		2,218		1,022	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			170		786		811		174		1,593		1,767		738	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			170		786		856		174		1,638		1,812		824	1981		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			413		999		777		413		1,776		2,189		941	1975		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			413		999		808		413		1,807		2,220		1,032	1975		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Baltimore	MD			154		555		1,469		306		1,872		2,178		729	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MD			154		555		1,473		306		1,876		2,182		840	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Baltimore	MD			479		1,742		2,906		479		4,648		5,127		1,643	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MD			479		1,742		2,978		479		4,720		5,199		1,904	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Melbourne	FL			883		2,104		1,721		883		3,825		4,708		1,788	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			883		2,104		2,026		883		4,130		5,013		2,007	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Newport News	VA			316		1,471		973		316		2,444		2,760		1,152	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	VA			316		1,471		1,016		316		2,487		2,803		1,293	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola	FL			632		2,962		1,558		651		4,501		5,152		2,226	1983		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			632		2,962		1,649		651		4,592		5,243		2,472	1983		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Hartford	CT			715		1,695		1,243		715		2,938		3,653		1,301	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	CT			715		1,695		1,383		715		3,078		3,793		1,461	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			304		1,118		2,759		619		3,562		4,181		1,330	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	GA			304		1,118		2,820		619		3,623		4,242		1,526	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Alexandria																						VA			1,375		3,220		2,836		1,376		6,055		7,431		2,919	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola																						FL			244		901		658		244		1,559		1,803		871	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Melbourne																						FL			834		2,066		3,483		1,591		4,792		6,383		1,518	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Hartford																						CT			234		861		3,486		612		3,969		4,581		1,205	1992		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta																						GA			256		1,244		2,231		256		3,475		3,731		1,501	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Norfolk																						VA			313		1,462		2,657		313		4,119		4,432		1,485	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Norfolk - Virginia Beach																						VA			1,142		4,998		3,411		1,142		8,409		9,551		3,218	1989/93/95		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Birmingham																						AL			307		1,415		1,922		385		3,259		3,644		1,430	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Birmingham																						AL			730		1,725		2,981		730		4,706		5,436		1,544	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Montgomery																						AL			863		2,041		1,415		863		3,456		4,319		1,630	1982		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville																						FL			326		1,515		1,368		326		2,883		3,209		1,182	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola																						FL			369		1,358		3,194		369		4,552		4,921		1,901	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola																						FL			244		1,128		2,819		720		3,471		4,191		1,205	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years


																								Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period														Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	Encum brance	Land		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Land		Building, Equipment and Impvmts		Total		Accum. Deprec.		Date of Const.	Date Acquired		Life on which depr in latest income statement is computed		ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Alexandria	VA			1,375		3,220		2,617		1,376		5,836		7,212		2,561	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola	FL			244		901		620		244		1,521		1,765		776	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Melbourne	FL			834		2,066		1,311		1,591		2,620		4,211		1,325	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Hartford	CT			234		861		3,055		612		3,538		4,150		1,011	1992		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Atlanta	GA			256		1,244		2,097		256		3,341		3,597		1,307	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Norfolk	VA			313		1,462		2,618		313		4,080		4,393		1,251	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Norfolk II	VA			278		1,004		453		278		1,457		1,735		746	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Birmingham	AL			307		1,415		1,866		385		3,203		3,588		1,234	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Birmingham	AL			730		1,725		2,945		730		4,670		5,400		1,291	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Montgomery	AL			863		2,041		864		863		2,905		3,768		1,441	1982		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville	FL			326		1,515		627		326		2,142		2,468		1,054	1987		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola	FL			369		1,358		3,040		369		4,398		4,767		1,625	1986		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola	FL			244		1,128		2,776		720		3,428		4,148		1,008	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Pensacola	FL			226		1,046		686		226		1,732		1,958		869	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			226		1,046		784		226		1,830		2,056		996	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Tampa	FL			1,088		2,597		1,114		1,088		3,711		4,799		1,909	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			1,088		2,597		1,160		1,088		3,757		4,845		2,121	1989		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Clearwater	FL			526		1,958		1,255		526		3,213		3,739		1,455	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			526		1,958		1,545		526		3,503		4,029		1,660	1985		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Largo	FL			672		2,439		879		672		3,318		3,990		1,576	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			672		2,439		900		672		3,339		4,011		1,757	1988		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Jackson	MS			343		1,580		2,491		796		3,618		4,414		1,279	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MS			343		1,580		2,612		796		3,739		4,535		1,475	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Jackson	MS			209		964		783		209		1,747		1,956		877	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years	MS			209		964		870		209		1,834		2,043		978	1990		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Providence																						RI			345		1,268		2,081		486		3,208		3,694		1,185	1984		6/26/1995		5 to 40 years
Richmond	VA			443		1,602		1,053		443		2,655		3,098		1,219	1987		8/25/1995		5 to 40 years	VA			443		1,602		1,104		443		2,706		3,149		1,383	1987		8/25/1995		5 to 40 years
Orlando	FL			1,161		2,755		1,262		1,162		4,016		5,178		1,949	1986		9/29/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			1,161		2,755		2,155		1,162		4,909		6,071		2,173	1986		9/29/1995		5 to 40 years
Birmingham	AL			424		1,506		1,170		424		2,676		3,100		1,259	1970		1/16/1996		5 to 40 years
Harrisburg	PA			360		1,641		694		360		2,335		2,695		1,167	1983		12/29/1995		5 to 40 years
Harrisburg	PA			627		2,224		3,837		692		5,996		6,688		1,750	1985		12/29/1995		5 to 40 years
Syracuse	NY			470		1,712		1,428		472		3,138		3,610		1,349	1987		12/27/1995		5 to 40 years	NY			470		1,712		1,512		472		3,222		3,694		1,534	1987		12/27/1995		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers	FL			205		912		374		206		1,285		1,491		744	1988		12/28/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			205		912		553		206		1,464		1,670		813	1988		12/28/1995		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers	FL			412		1,703		695		413		2,397		2,810		1,295	1991/94		12/28/1995		5 to 40 years	FL			412		1,703		763		413		2,465		2,878		1,420	1991/94		12/28/1995		5 to 40 years
Harrisburg																						PA			360		1,641		711		360		2,352		2,712		1,308	1983		12/29/1995		5 to 40 years
Harrisburg																						PA			627		2,224		3,872		692		6,031		6,723		2,068	1985		12/29/1995		5 to 40 years
Newport News	VA			442		1,592		1,393		442		2,985		3,427		1,203	1988/93		1/5/1996		5 to 40 years	VA			442		1,592		1,422		442		3,014		3,456		1,408	1988/93		1/5/1996		5 to 40 years
Montgomery	AL			353		1,299		859		353		2,158		2,511		915	1984		1/23/1996		5 to 40 years	AL			353		1,299		1,094		353		2,393		2,746		1,042	1984		1/23/1996		5 to 40 years
Charleston	SC			237		858		847		232		1,710		1,942		776	1985		3/1/1996		5 to 40 years	SC			237		858		983		245		1,833		2,078		893	1985		3/1/1996		5 to 40 years
Tampa	FL			766		1,800		725		766		2,525		3,291		1,189	1985		3/28/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			766		1,800		772		766		2,572		3,338		1,324	1985		3/28/1996		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Ft.Worth	TX			442		1,767		399		442		2,166		2,608		1,032	1987		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years	TX			442		1,767		454		442		2,221		2,663		1,146	1987		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Ft.Worth	TX			408		1,662		1,215		408		2,877		3,285		1,268	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years	TX			408		1,662		1,284		408		2,946		3,354		1,416	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Ft.Worth	TX			328		1,324		449		328		1,773		2,101		830	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years	TX			328		1,324		431		328		1,755		2,083		922	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years
San Antonio	TX			436		1,759		1,345		436		3,104		3,540		1,337	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years	TX			436		1,759		1,518		436		3,277		3,713		1,499	1986		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years
San Antonio	TX			289		1,161		2,381		289		3,542		3,831		180	2012		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years	TX			289		1,161		2,453		289		3,614		3,903		362	2012		3/29/1996		5 to 40 years
Syracuse	NY			481		1,559		2,505		671		3,874		4,545		1,545	1983		6/5/1996		5 to 40 years
Montgomery	AL			279		1,014		1,354		433		2,214		2,647		850	1988		5/21/1996		5 to 40 years	AL			279		1,014		1,476		433		2,336		2,769		1,001	1988		5/21/1996		5 to 40 years
West Palm	FL			345		1,262		502		345		1,764		2,109		795	1986		5/29/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			345		1,262		667		345		1,929		2,274		891	1986		5/29/1996		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers	FL			229		884		2,822		383		3,552		3,935		653	1986		5/29/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			229		884		2,864		383		3,594		3,977		875	1986		5/29/1996		5 to 40 years
Syracuse																						NY			481		1,559		2,643		671		4,012		4,683		1,771	1983		6/5/1996		5 to 40 years
Lakeland	FL			359		1,287		1,257		359		2,544		2,903		1,175	1988		6/26/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			359		1,287		1,291		359		2,578		2,937		1,318	1988		6/26/1996		5 to 40 years
Boston - Springfield	MA			251		917		2,376		297		3,247		3,544		1,371	1986		6/28/1996		5 to 40 years
Boston—Springfield																						MA			251		917		2,530		297		3,401		3,698		1,567	1986		6/28/1996		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers	FL			344		1,254		574		310		1,862		2,172		855	1987		6/28/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			344		1,254		654		310		1,942		2,252		996	1987		6/28/1996		5 to 40 years
Cincinnati	OH			557		1,988		936		689		2,792		3,481		709	1988		7/23/1996		5 to 40 years	OH			557		1,988		977		688		2,834		3,522		894	1988		7/23/1996		5 to 40 years
Baltimore	MD			777		2,770		587		777		3,357		4,134		1,545	1990		7/26/1996		5 to 40 years	MD			777		2,770		798		777		3,568		4,345		1,758	1990		7/26/1996		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville	FL			568		2,028		1,212		568		3,240		3,808		1,518	1987		8/23/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			568		2,028		1,366		568		3,394		3,962		1,713	1987		8/23/1996		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville	FL			436		1,635		788		436		2,423		2,859		1,119	1985		8/26/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			436		1,635		920		436		2,555		2,991		1,255	1985		8/26/1996		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville	FL			535		2,033		530		538		2,560		3,098		1,274	1987/92		8/30/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			535		2,033		603		538		2,633		3,171		1,422	1987/92		8/30/1996		5 to 40 years
Charlotte	NC			487		1,754		652		487		2,406		2,893		1,036	1995		9/16/1996		5 to 40 years	NC			487		1,754		683		487		2,437		2,924		1,198	1995		9/16/1996		5 to 40 years
Charlotte	NC			315		1,131		481		315		1,612		1,927		731	1995		9/16/1996		5 to 40 years	NC			315		1,131		508		315		1,639		1,954		845	1995		9/16/1996		5 to 40 years
Orlando	FL			314		1,113		1,258		314		2,371		2,685		1,025	1975		10/30/1996		5 to 40 years	FL			314		1,113		1,296		314		2,409		2,723		1,155	1975		10/30/1996		5 to 40 years
Rochester	NY			704		2,496		2,458		707		4,951		5,658		1,722	1990		12/20/1996		5 to 40 years	NY			704		2,496		2,851		707		5,344		6,051		1,987	1990		12/20/1996		5 to 40 years
Youngstown																						OH			600		2,142		2,574		693		4,623		5,316		1,745	1988		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			751		2,676		4,405		751		7,081		7,832		2,404	1986		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			725		2,586		2,332		725		4,918		5,643		2,152	1978		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			637		2,918		2,052		701		4,906		5,607		2,610	1979		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			495		1,781		1,386		495		3,167		3,662		1,480	1979		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			761		2,714		1,734		761		4,448		5,209		2,201	1977		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			418		1,921		2,934		418		4,855		5,273		1,959	1970		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland																						OH			606		2,164		1,523		606		3,687		4,293		1,614	1982		1/10/1997		5 to 40 years
San Antonio																						TX			474		1,686		688		504		2,344		2,848		1,049	1981		1/30/1997		5 to 40 years
San Antonio																						TX			346		1,236		576		346		1,812		2,158		865	1985		1/30/1997		5 to 40 years
San Antonio																						TX			432		1,560		2,101		432		3,661		4,093		1,632	1995		1/30/1997		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont																						TX			634		2,565		4,380		634		6,945		7,579		1,940	1993/95		3/26/1997		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont																						TX			566		2,279		570		566		2,849		3,415		1,400	1995		3/26/1997		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont																						TX			293		1,357		707		293		2,064		2,357		947	1995		3/26/1997		5 to 40 years
Chesapeake																						VA			260		1,043		4,720		260		5,763		6,023		1,491	1988/95		3/31/1997		5 to 40 years
Orlando-W 25th St																						FL			289		1,160		2,467		616		3,300		3,916		948	1984		3/31/1997		5 to 40 years
Delray																						FL			491		1,756		778		491		2,534		3,025		1,321	1969		4/11/1997		5 to 40 years
Savannah																						GA			296		1,196		590		296		1,786		2,082		875	1988		5/8/1997		5 to 40 years
Delray																						FL			921		3,282		795		921		4,077		4,998		2,021	1980		5/21/1997		5 to 40 years
Cleveland-Avon																						OH			301		1,214		2,302		304		3,513		3,817		1,438	1989		6/4/1997		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth																						TX			965		3,864		1,728		943		5,614		6,557		2,652	1977		6/30/1997		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Alpharetta																						GA			1,033		3,753		720		1,033		4,473		5,506		2,186	1994		7/24/1997		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Marietta																						GA			769		2,788		642		825		3,374		4,199		1,641	1996		7/24/1997		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Doraville																						GA			735		3,429		496		735		3,925		4,660		1,962	1995		8/21/1997		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Youngstown
OH 600    2,142    2,292    693    4,341    5,034    1,520    1988 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 751    2,676    4,123    751    6,799    7,550    1,999    1986 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 725    2,586    2,226    725    4,812    5,537    1,857    1978 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 637    2,918    1,966    701    4,820    5,521    2,307    1979 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 495    1,781    1,132    495    2,913    3,408    1,306    1979 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 761    2,714    1,637    761    4,351    5,112    1,921    1977 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 418    1,921    2,893    418    4,814    5,232    1,689    1970 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland
OH 606    2,164    1,477    606    3,641    4,247    1,407    1982 1/10/1997    5 to 40 years
San Antonio
TX 474    1,686    531    504    2,187    2,691    938    1981 1/30/1997    5 to 40 years
San Antonio
TX 346    1,236    546    346    1,782    2,128    772    1985 1/30/1997    5 to 40 years
San Antonio
TX 432    1,560    1,969    432    3,529    3,961    1,418    1995 1/30/1997    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 634    2,565    1,449    634    4,014    4,648    1,690    1993/95 3/26/1997    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 566    2,279    511    566    2,790    3,356    1,218    1995 3/26/1997    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 293    1,357    638    293    1,995    2,288    834    1995 3/26/1997    5 to 40 years
Lynchburg-Lakeside
VA 335    1,342    1,527    335    2,869    3,204    1,145    1982 3/31/1997    5 to 40 years
Lynchburg-Timberlake
VA 328    1,315    1,111    328    2,426    2,754    1,070    1985 3/31/1997    5 to 40 years
Lynchburg-Amherst
VA 155    710    464    152    1,177    1,329    555    1987 3/31/1997    5 to 40 years
Chesapeake
VA 260    1,043    3,482    260    4,525    4,785    1,222    1988/95 3/31/1997    5 to 40 years
Orlando-W 25th St
FL 289    1,160    2,106    616    2,939    3,555    773    1984 3/31/1997    5 to 40 years
Delray
FL 491    1,756    730    491    2,486    2,977    1,184    1969 4/11/1997    5 to 40 years
Savannah
GA 296    1,196    578    296    1,774    2,070    768    1988 5/8/1997    5 to 40 years
Delray
FL 921    3,282    655    921    3,937    4,858    1,808    1980 5/21/1997    5 to 40 years
Cleveland-Avon
OH 301    1,214    2,275    304    3,486    3,790    1,238    1989 6/4/1997    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 965    3,864    1,553    943    5,439    6,382    2,370    1977 6/30/1997    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 370    1,486    743    370    2,229    2,599    1,048    1975 6/30/1997    5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Alpharetta
GA 1,033    3,753    690    1,033    4,443    5,476    1,974    1994 7/24/1997    5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Marietta
GA 769    2,788    577    825    3,309    4,134    1,465    1996 7/24/1997    5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Doraville
GA 735    3,429    456    735    3,885    4,620    1,765    1995 8/21/1997    5 to 40 years
Greensboro-Hilltop
NC 268    1,097    431    231    1,565    1,796    699    1995 9/25/1997    5 to 40 years
Greensboro-StgCch
NC 89    376    1,729    89    �� 2,105    2,194    788    1997 9/25/1997    5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge-Airline
LA 396    1,831    1,115    421    2,921    3,342    1,202    1982 10/9/1997    5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge-Airline2
LA 282    1,303    435    282    1,738    2,020    794    1985 11/21/1997    5 to 40 years
Harrisburg-Peiffers
PA 635    2,550    669    637    3,217    3,854    1,430    1984 12/3/1997    5 to 40 years
Chesapeake-Military
VA 542    2,210    486    542    2,696    3,238    1,144    1996 2/5/1998    5 to 40 years
Chesapeake-Volvo
VA 620    2,532    1,233    620    3,765    4,385    1,503    1995 2/5/1998    5 to 40 years
Virginia Beach-Shell
VA 540    2,211    431    540    2,642    3,182    1,154    1991 2/5/1998    5 to 40 years
Virginia Beach-Central
VA 864    3,994    1,074    864    5,068    5,932    2,131    1993/95 2/5/1998    5 to 40 years
Norfolk-Naval Base
VA 1,243    5,019    947    1,243    5,966    7,209    2,534    1975 2/5/1998    5 to 40 years
Tampa-E.Hillsborough
FL 709    3,235    897    709    4,132    4,841    1,863    1985 2/4/1998    5 to 40 years
Boston-Northbridge
MA 441    1,788    1,092    694    2,627    3,321    643    1988 2/9/1998    5 to 40 years
Middletown-Harriman
NY 843    3,394    784    843    4,178    5,021    1,811    1989/95 2/4/1998    5 to 40 years
Greensboro-High Point
NC 397    1,834    658    397    2,492    2,889    1,087    1993 2/10/1998    5 to 40 years
Lynchburg-Timberlake
VA 488    1,746    716    488    2,462    2,950    1,016    1990/96 2/18/1998    5 to 40 years
Titusville
FL 492    1,990    1,163    688    2,957    3,645    756    1986/90 2/25/1998    5 to 40 years
Boston-Salem
MA 733    2,941    1,372    733    4,313    5,046    1,923    1979 3/3/1998    5 to 40 years
Providence
RI 345    1,268    2,032    486    3,159    3,645    1,001    1984 6/26/1995    5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy
TN 384    1,371    617    384    1,988    2,372    903    1987 3/27/1998    5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Hwy 58
TN 296    1,198    2,225    414    3,305    3,719    1,098    1985 3/27/1998    5 to 40 years
Ft. Oglethorpe
GA 349    1,250    1,737    464    2,872    3,336    888    1989 3/27/1998    5 to 40 years
Birmingham-Walt
AL 544    1,942    1,301    544    3,243    3,787    1,366    1984 3/27/1998    5 to 40 years
Providence
RI 702    2,821    3,846    702    6,667    7,369    1,920    1984/88 3/26/1998    5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham
NC 775    3,103    911    775    4,014    4,789    1,677    1988/91 4/9/1998    5 to 40 years


			Initial Cost to Company					Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum				Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance	Land			Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Greensboro-Hilltop	NC			268			1,097		859		231		1,993		2,224		814	1995		9/25/1997		5 to 40 years
Greensboro-StgCch	NC			89			376		1,854		89		2,230		2,319		941	1997		9/25/1997		5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge-Airline	LA			396			1,831		1,161		421		2,967		3,388		1,382	1982		10/9/1997		5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge-Airline2	LA			282			1,303		504		282		1,807		2,089		894	1985		11/21/1997		5 to 40 years
Harrisburg-Peiffers	PA			635			2,550		731		637		3,279		3,916		1,626	1984		12/3/1997		5 to 40 years
Tampa-E. Hillsborough	FL			709			3,235		979		709		4,214		4,923		2,041	1985		2/4/1998		5 to 40 years
NY Metro-Middletown	NY			843			3,394		1,038		843		4,432		5,275		2,047	1989/95		2/4/1998		5 to 40 years
Chesapeake-Military	VA			542			2,210		527		542		2,737		3,279		1,304	1996		2/5/1998		5 to 40 years
Chesapeake-Volvo	VA			620			2,532		1,289		620		3,821		4,441		1,727	1995		2/5/1998		5 to 40 years
Virginia Beach-Shell	VA			540			2,211		508		540		2,719		3,259		1,300	1991		2/5/1998		5 to 40 years
Norfolk-Naval Base	VA			1,243			5,019		990		1,243		6,009		7,252		2,862	1975		2/5/1998		5 to 40 years
Boston-Northbridge	MA			441			1,788		1,120		694		2,655		3,349		813	1988		2/9/1998		5 to 40 years
Greensboro-High Point	NC			397			1,834		964		397		2,798		3,195		1,241	1993		2/10/1998		5 to 40 years
Titusville	FL			492			1,990		1,282		688		3,076		3,764		953	1986/90		2/25/1998		5 to 40 years
Boston-Salem	MA			733			2,941		1,676		733		4,617		5,350		2,186	1979		3/3/1998		5 to 40 years
Providence	RI			702			2,821		4,243		702		7,064		7,766		2,310	1984/88		3/26/1998		5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy	TN			384			1,371		623		384		1,994		2,378		1,018	1987		3/27/1998		5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Hwy 58	TN			296			1,198		2,358		414		3,438		3,852		1,293	1985		3/27/1998		5 to 40 years
Ft. Oglethorpe	GA			349			1,250		1,834		464		2,969		3,433		1,061	1989		3/27/1998		5 to 40 years
Birmingham-Walt	AL			544			1,942		1,311		544		3,253		3,797		1,555	1984		3/27/1998		5 to 40 years
Salem-Policy	NH			742			2,977		649		742		3,626		4,368		1,679	1980		4/7/1998		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC			775			3,103		940		775		4,043		4,818		1,904	1988/91		4/9/1998		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC			940			3,763		979		940		4,742		5,682		2,235	1990/96		4/9/1998		5 to 40 years
Youngstown-Warren	OH			522			1,864		1,393		569		3,210		3,779		1,454	1986		4/22/1998		5 to 40 years
Youngstown-Warren	OH			512			1,829		2,765		633		4,473		5,106		1,561	1986		4/22/1998		5 to 40 years
Jackson	MS			744			3,021		288		744		3,309		4,053		1,575	1995		5/13/1998		5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy	TX			419			1,524		4,064		419		5,588		6,007		1,613	1994		5/20/1998		5 to 40 years
Melbourne	FL			662			2,654		3,704		662		6,358		7,020		1,558	1985		6/2/1998		5 to 40 years
Vero Beach	FL			489			1,813		1,768		584		3,486		4,070		1,136	1997		6/12/1998		5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble	TX			447	��		1,790		2,587		740		4,084		4,824		1,523	1986		6/16/1998		5 to 40 years
Houston-Webster	TX			635			2,302		371		635		2,673		3,308		1,200	1997		6/19/1998		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			548			1,988		423		548		2,411		2,959		1,097	1997		6/19/1998		5 to 40 years
San Marcos	TX			324			1,493		2,204		324		3,697		4,021		1,345	1994		6/30/1998		5 to 40 years
Austin-McNeil	TX			492			1,995		2,631		510		4,608		5,118		1,509	1994		6/30/1998		5 to 40 years
Austin-FM	TX			484			1,951		724		481		2,678		3,159		1,184	1996		6/30/1998		5 to 40 years
Hollywood-Sheridan	FL			1,208			4,854		700		1,208		5,554		6,762		2,620	1988		7/1/1998		5 to 40 years
Pompano Beach-Atlantic	FL			944			3,803		795		944		4,598		5,542		2,182	1985		7/1/1998		5 to 40 years
Pompano Beach-Sample	FL			903			3,643		592		903		4,235		5,138		1,978	1988		7/1/1998		5 to 40 years
Boca Raton-18th St	FL			1,503			6,059		-1,853		851		4,858		5,709		2,298	1991		7/1/1998		5 to 40 years
Hollywood-N.21st	FL			840			3,373		642		840		4,015		4,855		1,913	1987		8/3/1998		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			550			1,998		850		550		2,848		3,398		1,199	1996		9/29/1998		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			670			2,407		1,761		670		4,168		4,838		1,690	1996		10/9/1998		5 to 40 years
Cincinnati-Batavia	OH			390			1,570		1,462		390		3,032		3,422		1,136	1988		11/19/1998		5 to 40 years
Jackson-N.West	MS			460			1,642		765		460		2,407		2,867		1,151	1984		12/1/1998		5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy	TX			507			2,058		1,812		507		3,870		4,377		1,455	1993		12/15/1998		5 to 40 years
Providence	RI			447			1,776		1,023		447		2,799		3,246		1,268	1986/94		2/2/1999		5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Pinhook 1	LA			556			1,951		1,288		556		3,239		3,795		1,606	1980		2/17/1999		5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Pinhook2	LA			708			2,860		1,320		708		4,180		4,888		1,591	1992/94		2/17/1999		5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Ambassador	LA			314			1,095		954		314		2,049		2,363		1,055	1975		2/17/1999		5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Evangeline	LA			188			652		1,674		188		2,326		2,514		1,073	1977		2/17/1999		5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Guilbeau	LA			963			3,896		1,136		963		5,032		5,995		2,108	1994		2/17/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Gilbert	AZ			651			2,600		1,313		772		3,792		4,564		1,600	1995		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Glendale	AZ			565			2,596		769		565		3,365		3,930		1,472	1997		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa	AZ			330			1,309		2,586		733		3,492		4,225		1,173	1986		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa	AZ			339			1,346		740		339		2,086		2,425		882	1986		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa	AZ			291			1,026		1,143		291		2,169		2,460		835	1976		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa	AZ			354			1,405		594		354		1,999		2,353		911	1986		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Camelback	AZ			453			1,610		1,095		453		2,705		3,158		1,211	1984		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Bell	AZ			872			3,476		3,618		872		7,094		7,966		2,354	1984		5/18/1999		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-35th Ave	AZ			849			3,401		955		849		4,356		5,205		1,932	1996		5/21/1999		5 to 40 years
Portland	ME			410			1,626		2,024		410		3,650		4,060		1,435	1988		8/2/1999		5 to 40 years
Space Coast-Cocoa	FL			667			2,373		1,014		667		3,387		4,054		1,514	1982		9/29/1999		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			335			1,521		853		335		2,374		2,709		921	1985		11/9/1999		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Raleigh-Durham
NC 940    3,763    837    940    4,600    5,540    1,965    1990/96 4/9/1998    5 to 40 years
Salem-Policy
NH 742    2,977    532    742    3,509    4,251    1,474    1980 4/7/1998    5 to 40 years
Youngstown-Warren
OH 522    1,864    1,382    569    3,199    3,768    1,280    1986 4/22/1998    5 to 40 years
Youngstown-Warren
OH 512    1,829    2,031    633    3,739    4,372    1,329    1986 4/22/1998    5 to 40 years
Melbourne
FL 662    2,654    1,916    662    4,570    5,232    1,230    1985 6/2/1998    5 to 40 years
Jackson
MS 744    3,021    251    744    3,272    4,016    1,384    1995 5/13/1998    5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy
TX 419    1,524    3,974    419    5,498    5,917    1,347    1994 5/20/1998    5 to 40 years
Hollywood-Sheridan
FL 1,208    4,854    630    1,208    5,484    6,692    2,324    1988 7/1/1998    5 to 40 years
Pompano Beach-Atlantic
FL 944    3,803    573    944    4,376    5,320    1,941    1985 7/1/1998    5 to 40 years
Pompano Beach-Sample
FL 903    3,643    456    903    4,099    5,002    1,756    1988 7/1/1998    5 to 40 years
Boca Raton-18th St
FL 1,503    6,059    -1,966    851    4,745    5,596    2,027    1991 7/1/1998    5 to 40 years
Vero Beach
FL 489    1,813    1,710    584    3,428    4,012    945    1997 6/12/1998    5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble
TX 447    1,790    2,454    740    3,951    4,691    1,332    1986 6/16/1998    5 to 40 years
Houston-Webster
TX 635    2,302    235    635    2,537    3,172    1,059    1997 6/19/1998    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 548    1,988    394    548    2,382    2,930    984    1997 6/19/1998    5 to 40 years
Hollywood-N.21st
FL 840    3,373    598    840    3,971    4,811    1,711    1987 8/3/1998    5 to 40 years
San Marcos
TX 324    1,493    2,135    324    3,628    3,952    1,179    1994 6/30/1998    5 to 40 years
Austin-McNeil
TX 492    1,995    2,517    510    4,494    5,004    1,284    1994 6/30/1998    5 to 40 years
Austin-FM
TX 484    1,951    613    481    2,567    3,048    1,051    1996 6/30/1998    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 550    1,998    878    550    2,876    3,426    1,083    1996 9/29/1998    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 670    2,407    1,708    670    4,115    4,785    1,462    1996 10/9/1998    5 to 40 years
Cincinnati-Batavia
OH 390    1,570    1,167    390    2,737    3,127    976    1988 11/19/1998    5 to 40 years
Jackson-N.West
MS 460    1,642    596    460    2,238    2,698    1,023    1984 12/1/1998    5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy
TX 507    2,058    1,747    507    3,805    4,312    1,262    1993 12/15/1998    5 to 40 years
Providence
RI 447    1,776    946    447    2,722    3,169    1,114    1986/94 2/2/1999    5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Pinhook 1
LA 556    1,951    1,184    556    3,135    3,691    1,423    1980 2/17/1999    5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Pinhook2
LA 708    2,860    1,198    708    4,058    4,766    1,338    1992/94 2/17/1999    5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Ambassador
LA 314    1,095    927    314    2,022    2,336    911    1975 2/17/1999    5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Evangeline
LA 188    652    1,625    188    2,277    2,465    943    1977 2/17/1999    5 to 40 years
Lafayette-Guilbeau
LA 963    3,896    982    963    4,878    5,841    1,847    1994 2/17/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Gilbert
AZ 651    2,600    1,254    772    3,733    4,505    1,388    1995 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Glendale
AZ 565    2,596    682    565    3,278    3,843    1,289    1997 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa
AZ 330    1,309    2,557    733    3,463    4,196    968    1986 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa
AZ 339    1,346    701    339    2,047    2,386    771    1986 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa
AZ 291    1,026    1,034    291    2,060    2,351    716    1976 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Mesa
AZ 354    1,405    526    354    1,931    2,285    804    1986 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Camelback
AZ 453    1,610    953    453    2,563    3,016    1,065    1984 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-Bell
AZ 872    3,476    3,518    872    6,994    7,866    1,966    1984 5/18/1999    5 to 40 years
Phoenix-35th Ave
AZ 849    3,401    843    849    4,244    5,093    1,676    1996 5/21/1999    5 to 40 years
Portland
ME 410    1,626    1,929    410    3,555    3,965    1,238    1988 8/2/1999    5 to 40 years
Cocoa
FL 667    2,373    877    667    3,250    3,917    1,313    1982 9/29/1999    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 335    1,521    592    335    2,113    2,448    826    1985 11/9/1999    5 to 40 years
Middletown-Monroe
NY 276    1,312    1,277    276    2,589    2,865    872    1998 2/2/2000    5 to 40 years
Boston - N. Andover
MA 633    2,573    984    633    3,557    4,190    1,267    1989 2/15/2000    5 to 40 years
Houston-Seabrook
TX 633    2,617    446    633    3,063    3,696    1,201    1996 3/1/2000    5 to 40 years
Ft. Lauderdale
FL 384    1,422    633    384    2,055    2,439    789    1994 5/2/2000    5 to 40 years
Birmingham-Bessemer
AL 254    1,059    1,340    254    2,399    2,653    744    1998 11/15/2000    5 to 40 years
Brewster
NY 1,716    6,920    1,543    1,981    8,198    10,179    1,627    1991/97 12/27/2000    5 to 40 years
Austin-Lamar
TX 837    2,977    3,527    966    6,375    7,341    928    1996/99 2/22/2001    5 to 40 years
Houston
TX 733    3,392    756    841    4,040    4,881    1,060    1993/97 3/2/2001    5 to 40 years
Ft.Myers
FL 787    3,249    663    902    3,797    4,699    1,001    1997 3/13/2001    5 to 40 years
Boston-Dracut
MA 1,035    3,737    667    1,104    4,335    5,439    1,496    1986 12/1/2001    5 to 40 years


			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
NY Metro-Middletown	NY			276		1,312		1,314		276		2,626		2,902		1,010	1998		2/2/2000		5 to 40 years
Boston-N. Andover	MA			633		2,573		1,055		633		3,628		4,261		1,458	1989		2/15/2000		5 to 40 years
Houston-Seabrook	TX			633		2,617		476		633		3,093		3,726		1,351	1996		3/1/2000		5 to 40 years
Ft. Lauderdale	FL			384		1,422		842		384		2,264		2,648		897	1994		5/2/2000		5 to 40 years
Birmingham-Bessemer	AL			254		1,059		2,066		332		3,047		3,379		906	1998		11/15/2000		5 to 40 years
NY Metro-Brewster	NY			1,716		6,920		1,754		1,981		8,409		10,390		2,108	1991/97		12/27/2000		5 to 40 years
Austin-Lamar	TX			837		2,977		3,579		966		6,427		7,393		1,271	1996/99		2/22/2001		5 to 40 years
Houston	TX			733		3,392		900		841		4,184		5,025		1,300	1993/97		3/2/2001		5 to 40 years
Ft.Myers	FL			787		3,249		750		902		3,884		4,786		1,254	1997		3/13/2001		5 to 40 years
Boston-Dracut	MA			1,035		3,737		743		1,104		4,411		5,515		1,743	1986		12/1/2001		5 to 40 years
Boston-Methuen	MA			1,024		3,649		827		1,091		4,409		5,500		1,675	1984		12/1/2001		5 to 40 years
Columbia	SC			883		3,139		1,473		942		4,553		5,495		1,624	1985		12/1/2001		5 to 40 years
Myrtle Beach	SC			552		1,970		1,155		589		3,088		3,677		1,192	1984		12/1/2001		5 to 40 years
Maine-Saco	ME			534		1,914		511		570		2,389		2,959		908	1988		12/3/2001		5 to 40 years
Boston-Plymouth	MA			1,004		4,584		2,370		1,004		6,954		7,958		2,292	1996		12/19/2001		5 to 40 years
Boston-Sandwich	MA			670		3,060		611		714		3,627		4,341		1,363	1984		12/19/2001		5 to 40 years
Syracuse	NY			294		1,203		1,194		327		2,364		2,691		774	1987		2/5/2002		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			734		2,956		822		784		3,728		4,512		1,379	1984		2/13/2002		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			394		1,595		499		421		2,067		2,488		763	1985		2/13/2002		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Hunt	TX			381		1,545		3,979		618		5,287		5,905		1,185	1980		2/13/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble	TX			919		3,696		702		919		4,398		5,317		1,562	1998/02		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-Pasadena	TX			612		2,468		463		612		2,931		3,543		1,053	1999		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-League City	TX			689		3,159		795		689		3,954		4,643		1,336	1994/97		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-Montgomery	TX			817		3,286		2,190		1,119		5,174		6,293		1,696	1998		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-S. Hwy 6	TX			407		1,650		327		407		1,977		2,384		723	1997		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont	TX			817		3,287		499		817		3,786		4,603		1,418	1996		6/19/2002		5 to 40 years
The Hamptons	NY			2,207		8,866		830		2,207		9,696		11,903		3,497	1989/95		12/16/2002		5 to 40 years
The Hamptons	NY			1,131		4,564		608		1,131		5,172		6,303		1,823	1998		12/16/2002		5 to 40 years
The Hamptons	NY			635		2,918		447		635		3,365		4,000		1,193	1997		12/16/2002		5 to 40 years
The Hamptons	NY			1,251		5,744		543		1,251		6,287		7,538		2,198	1994/98		12/16/2002		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			1,039		4,201		258		1,039		4,459		5,498		1,517	1995/99		8/26/2003		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			827		3,776		509		827		4,285		5,112		1,422	1998/01		10/1/2003		5 to 40 years
Stamford	CT			2,713		11,013		595		2,713		11,608		14,321		3,920	1998		3/17/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Tomball	TX			773		3,170		1,876		773		5,046		5,819		1,590	2000		5/19/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Conroe	TX			1,195		4,877		435		1,195		5,312		6,507		1,664	2001		5/19/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring	TX			1,103		4,550		512		1,103		5,062		6,165		1,684	2001		5/19/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Bissonnet	TX			1,061		4,427		2,910		1,061		7,337		8,398		2,191	2003		5/19/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Alvin	TX			388		1,640		1,046		388		2,686		3,074		801	2003		5/19/2004		5 to 40 years
Clearwater	FL			1,720		6,986		315		1,720		7,301		9,021		2,366	2001		6/3/2004		5 to 40 years
Houston-Missouri City	TX			1,167		4,744		3,576		1,566		7,921		9,487		2,176	1998		6/23/2004		5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Hixson	TN			1,365		5,569		1,845		1,365		7,414		8,779		2,388	1998/02		8/4/2004		5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock	TX			2,047		5,857		880		1,976		6,808		8,784		2,181	2000		8/5/2004		5 to 40 years
Long Island-Bayshore	NY			1,131		4,609		252		1,131		4,861		5,992		1,492	2003		3/15/2005		5 to 40 years
Syracuse - Cicero	NY			527		2,121		3,273		527		5,394		5,921		1,014	1988/02		3/16/2005		5 to 40 years
Boston-Springfield	MA			612		2,501		368		612		2,869		3,481		859	1965/75		4/12/2005		5 to 40 years
Stamford	CT			1,612		6,585		289		1,612		6,874		8,486		2,166	2002		4/14/2005		5 to 40 years
Montgomery-Richard	AL			1,906		7,726		389		1,906		8,115		10,021		2,450	1997		6/1/2005		5 to 40 years
Houston-Jones	TX			1,214		4,949		363		1,215		5,311		6,526		1,592	1997/99		6/6/2005		5 to 40 years
Boston-Oxford	MA			470		1,902		1,668		470		3,570		4,040		1,008	2002		6/23/2005		5 to 40 years
Austin-290E	TX			537		2,183		-320		491		1,909		2,400		638	2003		7/12/2005		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Marbach	TX			556		2,265		549		556		2,814		3,370		866	2003		7/12/2005		5 to 40 years
Austin-South 1st	TX			754		3,065		259		754		3,324		4,078		1,028	2003		7/12/2005		5 to 40 years
Houston-Pinehurst	TX			484		1,977		1,544		484		3,521		4,005		957	2002/04		7/12/2005		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Marietta	GA			811		3,397		580		811		3,977		4,788		1,224	2003		9/15/2005		5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge	LA			719		2,927		2,568		719		5,495		6,214		1,291	1984/94		11/15/2005		5 to 40 years
SanMarcos-Hwy 35S	TX			628		2,532		3,288		982		5,466		6,448		773	2001		1/10/2006		5 to 40 years
Houston-Baytown	TX			596		2,411		287		596		2,698		3,294		735	2002		1/10/2006		5 to 40 years
Houston-Cypress	TX			721		2,994		2,318		721		5,312		6,033		1,303	2003		1/13/2006		5 to 40 years
Rochester	NY			937		3,779		228		937		4,007		4,944		1,151	2002/06		2/1/2006		5 to 40 years
Houston-Jones Rd 2	TX			707		2,933		2,831		707		5,764		6,471		1,506	2000		3/9/2006		5 to 40 years
Lafayette	LA			411		1,621		281		411		1,902		2,313		592	1997		4/13/2006		5 to 40 years
Lafayette	LA			463		1,831		208		463		2,039		2,502		616	2001/04		4/13/2006		5 to 40 years
Lafayette	LA			601		2,406		1,442		601		3,848		4,449		1,071	2002		4/13/2006		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Boston-Methuen
MA 1,024    3,649    751    1,091    4,333    5,424    1,439    1984 12/1/2001    5 to 40 years
Columbia
SC 883    3,139    1,359    942    4,439    5,381    1,381    1985 12/1/2001    5 to 40 years
Myrtle Beach
SC 552    1,970    1,002    588    2,936    3,524    993    1984 12/1/2001    5 to 40 years
Kingsland
GA 470    1,902    3,257    666    4,963    5,629    1,271    1989 12/1/2001    5 to 40 years
Saco
ME 534    1,914    417    570    2,295    2,865    770    1988 12/3/2001    5 to 40 years
Boston-Plymouth
MA 1,004    4,584    2,340    1,004    6,924    7,928    1,933    1996 12/19/2001    5 to 40 years
Boston-Sandwich
MA 670    3,060    545    714    3,561    4,275    1,174    1984 12/19/2001    5 to 40 years
Syracuse
NY 294    1,203    1,130    327    2,300    2,627    633    1987 2/5/2002    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 734    2,956    792    784    3,698    4,482    1,187    1984 2/13/2002    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 394    1,595    411    421    1,979    2,400    660    1985 2/13/2002    5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Hunt
TX 381    1,545    3,814    618    5,122    5,740    891    1980 2/13/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble
TX 919    3,696    641    919    4,337    5,256    1,348    1998/02 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston-Pasadena
TX 612    2,468    443    612    2,911    3,523    904    1999 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston-League City
TX 689    3,159    601    689    3,760    4,449    1,138    1994/97 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston-Montgomery
TX 817    3,286    2,210    1,119    5,194    6,313    1,428    1998 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston
TX 407    1,650    270    407    1,920    2,327    622    1997 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 817    3,287    446    817    3,733    4,550    1,188    1996 6/19/2002    5 to 40 years
The Hamptons
NY 2,207    8,866    756    2,207    9,622    11,829    2,990    1989/95 12/16/2002    5 to 40 years
The Hamptons
NY 1,131    4,564    584    1,131    5,148    6,279    1,556    1998 12/16/2002    5 to 40 years
The Hamptons
NY 635    2,918    432    635    3,350    3,985    1,006    1997 12/16/2002    5 to 40 years
The Hamptons
NY 1,251    5,744    493    1,252    6,236    7,488    1,876    1994/98 12/16/2002    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 1,039    4,201    218    1,039    4,419    5,458    1,273    1995/99 8/26/2003    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 827    3,776    469    827    4,245    5,072    1,199    1998/01 10/1/2003    5 to 40 years
Stamford
CT 2,713    11,013    393    2,713    11,406    14,119    3,299    1998 3/17/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Tomball
TX 773    3,170    1,801    773    4,971    5,744    1,319    2000 5/19/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Conroe
TX 1,195    4,877    288    1,195    5,165    6,360    1,426    2001 5/19/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring
TX 1,103    4,550    362    1,103    4,912    6,015    1,387    2001 5/19/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Bissonnet
TX 1,061    4,427    2,848    1,061    7,275    8,336    1,802    2003 5/19/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Alvin
TX 388    1,640    991    388    2,631    3,019    656    2003 5/19/2004    5 to 40 years
Clearwater
FL 1,720    6,986    197    1,720    7,183    8,903    1,955    2001 6/3/2004    5 to 40 years
Houston-Missouri City
TX 1,167    4,744    3,537    1,566    7,882    9,448    1,771    1998 6/23/2004    5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Hixson
TN 1,365    5,569    1,603    1,365    7,172    8,537    1,925    1998/02 8/4/2004    5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock
TX 2,047    5,857    826    1,976    6,754    8,730    1,817    2000 8/5/2004    5 to 40 years
Syracuse - Cicero
NY 527    2,121    852    527    2,973    3,500    796    1988/02 3/16/2005    5 to 40 years
Long Island-Bayshore
NY 1,131    4,609    209    1,131    4,818    5,949    1,221    2003 3/15/2005    5 to 40 years
Boston-Springfield
MA 612    2,501    220    612    2,721    3,333    714    1965/75 4/12/2005    5 to 40 years
Stamford
CT 1,612    6,585    240    1,612    6,825    8,437    1,791    2002 4/14/2005    5 to 40 years
Houston-Jones
TX 1,214    4,949    270    1,215    5,218    6,433    1,294    1997/99 6/6/2005    5 to 40 years
Montgomery-Richard
AL 1,906    7,726    284    1,906    8,010    9,916    2,019    1997 6/1/2005    5 to 40 years
Boston-Oxford
MA 470    1,902    1,648    470    3,550    4,020    800    2002 6/23/2005    5 to 40 years
Austin-290E
TX 537    2,183    -281    491    1,948    2,439    545    2003 7/12/2005    5 to 40 years
SanAntonio-Marbach
TX 556    2,265    514    556    2,779    3,335    689    2003 7/12/2005    5 to 40 years
Austin-South 1st
TX 754    3,065    219    754    3,284    4,038    858    2003 7/12/2005    5 to 40 years
Houston-Pinehurst
TX 484    1,977    1,519    484    3,496    3,980    768    2002/04 7/12/2005    5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Marietta
GA 811    3,397    548    811    3,945    4,756    988    2003 9/15/2005    5 to 40 years
Baton Rouge
LA 719    2,927    2,536    719    5,463    6,182    977    1984/94 11/15/2005    5 to 40 years
Houston-Cypress
TX 721    2,994    2,282    721    5,276    5,997    1008    2003 1/13/2006    5 to 40 years
San Marcos-Hwy 35S
TX 628    2,532    595    982    2,773    3,755    631    2001 1/10/2006    5 to 40 years
Houston-Baytown
TX 596    2,411    285    596    2,696    3,292    614    2002 1/10/2006    5 to 40 years
Rochester
NY 937    3,779    199    937    3,978    4,915    916    2002/06 2/1/2006    5 to 40 years
Houston-Jones Rd 2
TX 707    2,933    2,756    707    5,689    6,396    1195    2000 3/9/2006    5 to 40 years
Lafayette
LA 411    1,621    250    411    1,871    2,282    469    1997 4/13/2006    5 to 40 years


			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Lafayette	LA			542		1,319		2,210		542		3,529		4,071		920	1997/99		4/13/2006		5 to 40 years
Manchester	NH			832		3,268		185		832		3,453		4,285		977	2000		4/26/2006		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Largo	FL			1,270		5,037		376		1,270		5,413		6,683		1,502	1998		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Pinellas Park	FL			929		3,676		339		929		4,015		4,944		1,078	2000		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Tarpon Spring	FL			696		2,739		240		696		2,979		3,675		836	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
New Orleans	LA			1,220		4,805		316		1,220		5,121		6,341		1,432	2000		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Meramec	MO			1,113		4,359		378		1,113		4,737		5,850		1,322	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Charles Rock	MO			766		3,040		1,504		766		4,544		5,310		1,009	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Shackelford	MO			828		3,290		206		828		3,496		4,324		979	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-W.Washington	MO			734		2,867		2,503		734		5,370		6,104		1,139	1980/01		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Howdershell	MO			899		3,596		324		899		3,920		4,819		1,078	2000		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Lemay Ferry	MO			890		3,552		473		890		4,025		4,915		1,091	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
St Louis-Manchester	MO			697		2,711		225		697		2,936		3,633		809	2000		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			1,256		4,946		475		1,256		5,421		6,677		1,446	1998/03		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			605		2,434		197		605		2,631		3,236		698	2004		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			607		2,428		219		607		2,647		3,254		716	2004		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			1,073		4,276		98		1,073		4,374		5,447		1,184	2003		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			549		2,180		1,148		549		3,328		3,877		793	1998		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX			644		2,542		136		644		2,678		3,322		734	1999		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Blanco	TX			963		3,836		222		963		4,058		5,021		1,122	2004		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Broadway	TX			773		3,060		2,012		773		5,072		5,845		1,118	2000		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Huebner	TX			1,175		4,624		365		1,175		4,989		6,164		1,318	1998		6/22/2006		5 to 40 years
Nashua	NH			617		2,422		587		617		3,009		3,626		835	1989		6/29/2006		5 to 40 years
Lafayette	LA			699		2,784		3,809		699		6,593		7,292		1,276	1995/99		8/1/2006		5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy II	TN			619		2,471		169		619		2,640		3,259		726	2002		8/7/2006		5 to 40 years
Montgomery-E.S.Blvd	AL			1,158		4,639		1,032		1,158		5,671		6,829		1,541	1996/97		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Auburn-Pepperell Pkwy	AL			590		2,361		599		590		2,960		3,550		776	1998		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Auburn-Gatewood Dr	AL			694		2,758		344		694		3,102		3,796		809	2002/03		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Columbus-Williams Rd	GA			736		2,905		330		736		3,235		3,971		871	2002/04/06		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Columbus-Miller Rd	GA			975		3,854		1,383		975		5,237		6,212		1,113	1995		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Columbus-Armour Rd	GA			0		3,680		324		0		4,004		4,004		1,056	2004/05		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Columbus-Amber Dr	GA			439		1,745		321		439		2,066		2,505		575	1998		9/28/2006		5 to 40 years
Concord	NH			813		3,213		2,041		813		5,254		6,067		1,283	2000		10/31/2006		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont	TX			929		3,647		233		930		3,879		4,809		1,016	2002/04		3/8/2007		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont	TX			1,537		6,018		611		1,537		6,629		8,166		1,694	2003/06		3/8/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Langner Rd	NY			532		2,119		3,492		532		5,611		6,143		908	1993/07		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Transit Rd	NY			437		1,794		702		437		2,496		2,933		600	1998		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Lake Ave	NY			638		2,531		2,939		638		5,470		6,108		853	1997		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Union Rd	NY			348		1,344		474		348		1,818		2,166		435	1998		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-NF Blvd	NY			323		1,331		249		323		1,580		1,903		409	1998		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Young St	NY			315		2,185		1,143		316		3,327		3,643		774	1999/00		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Sheridan Dr	NY			961		3,827		2,637		961		6,464		7,425		1,288	1999		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Transit Rd	NY			375		1,498		649		375		2,147		2,522		505	1990/95		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
Rochester-Phillips Rd	NY			1,003		4,002		144		1,003		4,146		5,149		1,051	1999		3/30/2007		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Foster	TX			676		2,685		431		676		3,116		3,792		814	2003/06		5/21/2007		5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Memorial Pkwy	AL			1,607		6,338		1,085		1,677		7,353		9,030		1,771	1989/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Madison 1	AL			1,016		4,013		454		1,017		4,466		5,483		1,130	1993/07		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Gulfport	MS			1,423		5,624		197		1,423		5,821		7,244		1,469	1998/05		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Hwy 72	AL			1,206		4,775		365		1,206		5,140		6,346		1,266	1998/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Mobile-Airport Blvd	AL			1,216		4,819		359		1,216		5,178		6,394		1,331	2000/07		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Gulfport	MS			1,345		5,325		120		1,301		5,489		6,790		1,360	2002/04		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Madison 2	AL			1,164		4,624		297		1,164		4,921		6,085		1,233	2002/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Foley-Hwy 59	AL			1,346		5,474		1,575		1,346		7,049		8,395		1,512	2003/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Pensacola6-Nine Mile	FL			1,029		4,180		194		1,029		4,374		5,403		1,178	2003/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Auburn-College St	AL			686		2,732		242		686		2,974		3,660		775	2003		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Gulfport	MS			1,811		7,152		140		1,811		7,292		9,103		1,782	2004/06		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Pensacola7-Hwy 98	FL			732		3,015		82		732		3,097		3,829		822	2006		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Montgomery-Arrowhead	AL			1,075		4,333		302		1,075		4,635		5,710		1,166	2006		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Montgomery-McLemore	AL			885		3,586		253		885		3,839		4,724		945	2006		6/1/2007		5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont	TX			742		3,024		246		742		3,270		4,012		855	2002/05		11/14/2007		5 to 40 years
Hattiesburg-Classic	MS			444		1,799		228		444		2,027		2,471		521	1998		12/19/2007		5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Ginger	MS			384		1,548		139		384		1,687		2,071		405	2000		12/19/2007		5 to 40 years
Foley-7905 St Hwy 59	AL			437		1,757		207		437		1,964		2,401		461	2000		12/19/2007		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. �� Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Lafayette
LA 463    1,831    188    463    2,019    2,482    465    2001/04 4/13/2006    5 to 40 years
Lafayette
LA 601    2,406    1,362    601    3,768    4,369    839    2002 4/13/2006    5 to 40 years
Lafayette
LA 542    1,319    2,184    542    3,503    4,045    711    1997/99 4/13/2006    5 to 40 years
Manchester
NH 832    3,268    149    832    3,417    4,249    785    2000 4/26/2006    5 to 40 years
Nashua
NH 617    2,422    564    617    2,986    3,603    664    1989 6/29/2006    5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Largo
FL 1,270    5,037    233    1,270    5,270    6,540    1188    1998 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Pinellas Park
FL 929    3,676    304    929    3,980    4,909    861    2000 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Tarpon Springs
FL 696    2,739    172    696    2,911    3,607    660    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
New Orleans
LA 1,220    4,805    215    1,220    5,020    6,240    1132    2000 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Meramec
MO 1,113    4,359    361    1,113    4,720    5,833    1051    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Charles Rock
MO 766    3,040    1,434    766    4,474    5,240    752    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Shackelford
MO 828    3,290    199    828    3,489    4,317    785    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-W.Washington
MO 734    2,867    778    734    3,645    4,379    857    1980/01 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Howdershell
MO 899    3,596    298    899    3,894    4,793    861    2000 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Lemay Ferry
MO 890    3,552    397    890    3,949    4,839    864    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
St Louis-Manchester
MO 697    2,711    157    697    2,868    3,565    642    2000 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 1,256    4,946    377    1,256    5,323    6,579    1169    1998/03 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 605    2,434    141    605    2,575    3,180    567    2004 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 607    2,428    177    607    2,605    3,212    579    2004 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 1,073    4,276    77    1,073    4,353    5,426    970    2003 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 549    2,180    1,153    549    3,333    3,882    615    1998 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 644    2,542    136    644    2,678    3,322    594    1999 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Blanco
TX 963    3,836    195    963    4,031    4,994    908    2004 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Broadway
TX 773    3,060    1,932    773    4,992    5,765    811    2000 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Huebner
TX 1,175    4,624    313    1,175    4,937    6,112    1060    1998 6/22/2006    5 to 40 years
Chattanooga-Lee Hwy II
TN 619    2,471    141    619    2,612    3,231    574    2002 8/7/2006    5 to 40 years
Lafayette
LA 699    2,784    1,993    699    4,777    5,476    987    1995/99 8/1/2006    5 to 40 years
Montgomery-E.S.Blvd
AL 1,158    4,639    944    1,158    5,583    6,741    1200    1996/97 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Auburn-Pepperell Pkwy
AL 590    2,361    446    590    2,807    3,397    584    1998 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Auburn-Gatewood Dr
AL 694    2,758    252    694    3,010    3,704    632    2002/03 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Columbus-Williams Rd
GA 736    2,905    239    736    3,144    3,880    693    2002/04/06 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Columbus-Miller Rd
GA 975    3,854    1,290    975    5,144    6,119    807    1995 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Columbus-Armour Rd
GA 0    3,680    211    0    3,891    3,891    835    2004/05 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Columbus-Amber Dr
GA 439    1,745    265    439    2,010    2,449    427    1998 9/28/2006    5 to 40 years
Concord
NH 813    3,213    2,009    813    5,222    6,035    1007    2000 10/31/2006    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Langner Rd
NY 532    2,119    2,721    532    4,840    5,372    641    1993/07 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Transit Rd
NY 437    1,794    669    437    2,463    2,900    470    1998 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Lake Ave
NY 638    2,531    614    638    3,145    3,783    654    1997 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Union Rd
NY 348    1,344    280    348    1,624    1,972    328    1998 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Niagara Falls Blvd
NY 323    1,331    147    323    1,478    1,801    308    1998 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Young St
NY 315    2,185    998    316    3,182    3,498    595    1999/00 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Sheridan Dr
NY 961    3,827    2,480    961    6,307    7,268    935    1999 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Buffalo-Transit Rd
NY 375    1,498    344    375    1,842    2,217    414    1990/95 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Rochester-Phillips Rd
NY 1,003    4,002    123    1,003    4,125    5,128    824    1999 3/30/2007    5 to 40 years
Greenville
MS 1,100    4,386    648    1,100    5,034    6,134    1033    1994 1/11/2007    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 929    3,647    181    930    3,827    4,757    795    2002/04 3/8/2007    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 1,537    6,018    455    1,537    6,473    8,010    1298    2003/06 3/8/2007    5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Memorial Pkwy
AL 1,607    6,338    982    1,677    7,250    8,927    1352    1989/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Madison 1
AL 1,016    4,013    339    1,017    4,351    5,368    881    1993/07 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Bilox-Gulfport
MS 1,423    5,624    173    1,423    5,797    7,220    1142    1998/05 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years


				Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum				Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance		Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Jackson-Ridgeland	MS				1,479		5,965		546		1,479		6,511		7,990		1,529	1997/00		1/17/2008		5 to 40 years
Jackson-5111	MS				1,337		5,377		240		1,337		5,617		6,954		1,308	2003		1/17/2008		5 to 40 years
Cincinnati-Robertson	OH				852		3,409		274		852		3,683		4,535		772	2003/04		12/31/2008		5 to 40 years
Richmond-Bridge Rd	VA				1,047		5,981		2,729		1,047		8,710		9,757		1,334	2009		10/1/2009		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC				846		4,095		194		846		4,289		5,135		691	2000		12/28/2010		5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Wallace	NC				961		3,702		1,216		961		4,918		5,879		667	2008		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC				574		3,975		244		574		4,219		4,793		661	2008		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Westmoreland	NC				513		5,317		40		513		5,357		5,870		849	2009		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Matthews	NC				1,129		4,767		125		1,129		4,892		6,021		794	2009		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC				381		3,575		92		381		3,667		4,048		585	2008		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Zeb Morris	NC				965		3,355		103		965		3,458		4,423		555	2007		12/29/2010		5 to 40 years
Fair Lawn	NJ				796		9,467		312		796		9,779		10,575		1,388	1999		7/14/2011		5 to 40 years
Elizabeth	NJ				885		3,073		652		885		3,725		4,610		498	1988		7/14/2011		5 to 40 years
Saint Louis-High Ridge	MO				197		2,132		63		197		2,195		2,392		392	2007		7/28/2011		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Decatur	GA				1,043		8,252		84		1,043		8,336		9,379		1,145	2006		8/17/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble	TX				825		4,201		325		825		4,526		5,351		679	1993		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth	TX				693		3,552		121		693		3,673		4,366		545	2001		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Hwy 6N	TX				1,243		3,106		128		1,243		3,234		4,477		499	2000		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Austin-Cedar Park	TX				1,559		2,727		91		1,559		2,818		4,377		440	1998		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy	TX				691		4,435		2,478		691		6,913		7,604		801	2000		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Deer Park	TX				1,012		3,312		222		1,012		3,534		4,546		512	1998		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-W. Little York	TX				575		3,557		185		575		3,742		4,317		586	1998		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Pasadena	TX				705		4,223		206		705		4,429		5,134		651	2000		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Friendswood	TX				1,168		2,315		215		1,168		2,530		3,698		391	1994		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring	TX				2,152		3,027		330		2,152		3,357		5,509		528	1993		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-W. Sam Houston	TX				402		3,602		259		402		3,861		4,263		542	1999		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Austin-Pond Springs Rd	TX				1,653		4,947		409		1,653		5,356		7,009		741	1984		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring	TX				1,474		4,500		31		1,456		4,549		6,005		678	2006		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock	TX				177		3,223		143		177		3,366		3,543		493	1999		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Silverado Dr	TX				1,438		4,583		128		1,438		4,711		6,149		680	2000		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Sugarland	TX				272		3,236		196		272		3,432		3,704		526	2001		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Westheimer Rd	TX				536		2,687		167		536		2,854		3,390		430	1997		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Wilcrest Dr	TX				1,478		4,145		173		1,478		4,318		5,796		606	1999		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Woodlands	TX				1,315		6,142		222		1,315		6,364		7,679		880	1997		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Woodlands	TX				3,189		3,974		177		3,189		4,151		7,340		581	2000		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy Freeway	TX				1,049		5,175		517		1,049		5,692		6,741		805	1999		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Houston-Webster	TX		1,852		2,054		2,138		365		2,054		2,503		4,557		376	1982		9/22/2011		5 to 40 years
Newport News-Brick Kiln	VA				2,848		5,892		95		2,848		5,987		8,835		861	2004		9/29/2011		5 to 40 years
Pensacola-Palafox	FL				197		4,281		600		197		4,881		5,078		648	1996		11/15/2011		5 to 40 years
Miami	FL				2,960		12,077		123		2,960		12,200		15,160		1,446	2005		5/16/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Lake Forest	IL				1,932		11,606		167		1,932		11,773		13,705		1,372	1996/2004		6/6/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Schaumburg	IL				1,940		4,880		292		1,940		5,172		7,112		621	1998		6/6/2012		5 to 40 years
Norfolk - E. Little Creek	VA				911		5,862		73		911		5,935		6,846		723	2007		6/20/2012		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-14th St.	GA				1,560		6,766		27		1,560		6,793		8,353		798	2009		7/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - Middleburg	FL				644		5,719		78		644		5,797		6,441		676	2008		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - Orange Park	FL				772		3,882		76		772		3,958		4,730		490	2007		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - St. Augustine	FL				739		3,858		63		739		3,921		4,660		475	2007		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Atlanta - NE Expressway	GA				1,384		9,266		77		1,384		9,343		10,727		1,058	2009		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Kennesaw	GA				856		4,315		67		856		4,382		5,238		491	2008		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Lawrenceville	GA				855		3,838		122		855		3,960		4,815		482	2007		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Woodstock	GA				1,342		4,692		96		1,342		4,788		6,130		578	2009		9/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham	NC				2,337		4,901		219		2,337		5,120		7,457		608	2002		9/19/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Lindenhurst	IL				1,213		3,129		207		1,213		3,336		4,549		382	1999/2006		9/27/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Orland Park	IL				1,050		5,894		160		1,050		6,054		7,104		650	2007		12/10/2012		5 to 40 years
Phoenix-83rd	AZ				910		3,656		162		910		3,818		4,728		418	2008		12/18/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago-North Austin	IL				2,593		5,029		240		2,593		5,269		7,862		548	2005		12/20/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago-North Western	IL				1,718		6,466		643		1,798		7,029		8,827		695	2005		12/20/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago-West Pershing	IL				395		3,226		105		395		3,331		3,726		340	2008		12/20/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago - North Broadway	IL				2,373		9,869		126		2,373		9,995		12,368		1,010	2011		12/20/2012		5 to 40 years
Brandenton	FL				1,501		3,775		186		1,501		3,961		5,462		422	1997		12/21/2012		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers-Cleveland	FL				515		2,280		138		515		2,418		2,933		275	1998		12/21/2012		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-Drew St.	FL				1,234		4,018		126		1,234		4,144		5,378		458	2000		12/21/2012		5 to 40 years
Clearwater-N. Myrtle	FL				1,555		5,978		141		1,555		6,119		7,674		654	2000		12/21/2012		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Huntsville-Hwy 72
AL 1,206    4,775    288    1,206    5,063    6,269    988    1998/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Mobile-Airport Blvd
AL 1,216    4,819    334    1,216    5,153    6,369    1043    2000/07 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Bilox-Gulfport
MS 1,345    5,325    62    1,301    5,431    6,732    1054    2002/04 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Huntsville-Madison 2
AL 1,164    4,624    265    1,164    4,889    6,053    958    2002/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Foley-Hwy 59
AL 1,346    5,474    310    1,347    5,783    7,130    1154    2003/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Pensacola 6-Nine Mile
FL 1,029    4,180    171    1,029    4,351    5,380    927    2003/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Auburn-College St
AL 686    2,732    200    686    2,932    3,618    598    2003 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Gulfport
MS 1,811    7,152    112    1,811    7,264    9,075    1400    2004/06 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Pensacola 7-Hwy 98
FL 732    3,015    70    732    3,085    3,817    645    2006 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Montgomery-Arrowhead
AL 1,075    4,333    196    1,076    4,528    5,604    884    2006 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
Montgomery-McLemore
AL 885    3,586    155    885    3,741    4,626    722    2006 6/1/2007    5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Foster
TX 676    2,685    357    676    3,042    3,718    625    2003/06 5/21/2007    5 to 40 years
Houston-Beaumont
TX 742    3,024    189    742    3,213    3,955    619    2002/05 11/14/2007    5 to 40 years
Hattiesburg-Clasic
MS 444    1,799    163    444    1,962    2,406    372    1998 12/19/2007    5 to 40 years
Biloxi-Ginger
MS 384    1,548    103    384    1,651    2,035    300    2000 12/19/2007    5 to 40 years
Foley-7905 St Hwy 59
AL 437    1,757    190    437    1,947    2,384    344    2000 12/19/2007    5 to 40 years
Jackson-Ridgeland
MS 1,479    5,965    457    1,479    6,422    7,901    1163    1997/00 1/17/2008    5 to 40 years
Jackson-5111
MS 1,337    5,377    143    1,337    5,520    6,857    990    2003 1/17/2008    5 to 40 years
Cincinnati-Robertson
OH 852    3,409    200    852    3,609    4,461    564    2003/04 12/31/2008    5 to 40 years
Richmond-Bridge Rd
VA 1,047    5,981    36    1,047    6,017    7,064    909    2009 10/1/2009    5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham
NC 846    4,095    100    846    4,195    5,041    445    2000 12/28/2010    5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Wallace
NC 961    3,702    536    961    4,238    5,199    412    2008 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham
NC 574    3,975    103    575    4,077    4,652    427    2008 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Westmoreland
NC 513    5,317    36    513    5,353    5,866    552    2009 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Matthews
NC 1,129    4,767    84    1,129    4,851    5,980    514    2009 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham
NC 381    3,575    46    381    3,621    4,002    381    2008 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Charlotte-Zeb Morris
NC 965    3,355    57    965    3,412    4,377    358    2007 12/29/2010    5 to 40 years
Fair Lawn-Wagaraw
PA 796    9,467    78    796    9,545    10,341    881    1999 7/14/2011    5 to 40 years
Elizabeth-Allen
PA 885    3,073    487    885    3,560    4,445    277    1988 7/14/2011    5 to 40 years
Saint Louis-High Ridge
MO 197    2,132    37    197    2,169    2,366    237    2007 7/28/2011    5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Decatur
GA 1,043    8,252    67    1,043    8,319    9,362    719    2006 8/17/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Humble
TX 825    4,201    323    825    4,524    5,349    413    1993 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Dallas-Fort Worth
TX 693    3,552    101    693    3,653    4,346    337    2001 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Hwy 6N
TX 1,243    3,106    95    1,243    3,201    4,444    304    2000 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Austin-Cedar Park
TX 1,559    2,727    64    1,559    2,791    4,350    270    1998 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Katy
TX 691    4,435    126    691    4,561    5,252    414    2000 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Deer Park
TX 1,012    3,312    164    1,012    3,476    4,488    309    1998 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-W.Little York
TX 575    3,557    135    575    3,692    4,267    356    1998 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Pasadena
TX 705    4,223    146    705    4,369    5,074    394    2000 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Friendswood
TX 1,168    2,315    164    1,168    2,479    3,647    239    1994 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring
TX 2,152    3,027    275    2,152    3,302    5,454    314    1993 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-W.Sam Houston
TX 402    3,602    187    402    3,789    4,191    321    1999 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Austin-Pond Springs Rd
TX 1,653    4,947    223    1,653    5,170    6,823    448    1984 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Spring
TX 1,474    4,500    67    1,474    4,567    6,041    414    2006 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock
TX 177    3,223    91    177    3,314    3,491    305    1999 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Silverado Dr
TX 1,438    4,583    123    1,438    4,706    6,144    418    2000 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Sugarland
TX 272    3,236    162    272    3,398    3,670    320    2001 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Westheimer Rd
TX 536    2,687    142    536    2,829    3,365    258    1997 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Wilcrest Dr
TX 1,478    4,145    141    1,478    4,286    5,764    373    1999 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Woodlands
TX 1,315    6,142    195    1,315    6,337    7,652    535    1997 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Woodlands
TX 3,189    3,974    147    3,189    4,121    7,310    348    2000 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years


			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Austin-Cedar Park	TX			1,246		5,740		155		1,246		5,895		7,141		615	2006		12/27/2012		5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock	TX			774		3,327		146		774		3,473		4,247		363	2004		12/27/2012		5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock	TX			632		1,985		88		632		2,073		2,705		244	2007		12/27/2012		5 to 40 years
Chicago-Aurora	IL			269		3,126		320		269		3,446		3,715		336	2010		12/31/2012		5 to 40 years
San Antonio - Marbach	TX			337		2,005		191		337		2,196		2,533		238	2005		2/11/2013		5 to 40 years
Long Island - Lindenhurst	NY			2,122		8,735		517		2,122		9,252		11,374		857	2002		3/22/2013		5 to 40 years
Boston - Somerville	MA			1,553		7,186		21		1,506		7,254		8,760		727	2008		3/22/2013		5 to 40 years
Long Island - Deer Park	NY			1,096		8,276		89		1,096		8,365		9,461		731	2009		8/29/2013		5 to 40 years
Long Island - Amityville	NY			2,224		10,102		46		2,224		10,148		12,372		879	2009		8/29/2013		5 to 40 years
Colorado Springs - Scarlet	CO			629		5,201		184		629		5,385		6,014		442	2006		9/30/2013		5 to 40 years
Toms River - Route 37 W	NJ			1,843		6,544		99		1,843		6,643		8,486		575	2007		11/26/2013		5 to 40 years
Lake Worth - S Military	FL			868		5,306		709		868		6,015		6,883		490	2000		12/4/2013		5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock	TX			1,547		5,226		153		1,547		5,379		6,926		449	2008		12/27/2013		5 to 40 years
Hartford-Bristol	CT			1,174		8,816		81		1,174		8,897		10,071		674	2004		12/30/2013		5 to 40 years
Piscataway–New Brunswick	NJ			1,639		10,946		83		1,639		11,029		12,668		862	2006		12/30/2013		5 to 40 years
Fort Lauderdale - 3rd Ave	FL			7,629		11,918		199		7,629		12,117		19,746		949	1998		1/9/2014		5 to 40 years
West Palm - Mercer	FL			15,680		17,520		504		15,680		18,024		33,704		1,437	2000		1/9/2014		5 to 40 years
Austin - Manchaca	TX			3,999		4,297		665		3,999		4,962		8,961		409	1998/2002		1/17/2014		5 to 40 years
San Antonio	TX			2,235		6,269		328		2,235		6,597		8,832		514	2012		2/10/2014		5 to 40 years
Portland	ME			2,146		6,418		235		2,146		6,653		8,799		525	2000		2/11/2014		5 to 40 years
Portland-Topsham	ME			493		5,234		98		493		5,332		5,825		411	2006		2/11/2014		5 to 40 years
Chicago - St. Charles	IL			1,837		6,301		538		1,837		6,839		8,676		506	2004/2013		3/31/2014		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Ashland	IL			598		4,789		178		598		4,967		5,565		355	2014		5/5/2014		5 to 40 years
San Antonio - Walzem	TX			2,000		3,749		495		2,000		4,244		6,244		316	1997		5/13/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - Woodson	MO			2,444		5,966		1,587		2,444		7,553		9,997		549	1998		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - Mexico	MO			638		3,518		1,778		638		5,296		5,934		336	1998		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - Vogel	MO			2,010		3,544		232		2,010		3,776		5,786		303	2000		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - Manchester	MO			508		2,042		396		508		2,438		2,946		201	1996		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - North Highway	MO			1,989		4,045		567		1,989		4,612		6,601		365	1997		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Louis - Dunn	MO			1,538		4,510		386		1,538		4,896		6,434		390	2000		5/22/2014		5 to 40 years
Trenton-Hamilton Twnship	NJ			5,161		7,063		841		5,161		7,904		13,065		522	1980		6/5/2014		5 to 40 years
NY Metro-Fishkill	NY			1,741		6,006		309		1,741		6,315		8,056		424	2005		6/11/2014		5 to 40 years
Atlanta-Peachtree City	GA			2,263		4,931		440		2,263		5,371		7,634		392	2007		6/12/2014		5 to 40 years
Wayne - Willowbrook	NJ			0		2,292		196		0		2,488		2,488		411	2000		6/12/2014		5 to 40 years
Asbury Park - 1st Ave	NJ			819		4,734		548		819		5,282		6,101		368	2003		6/18/2014		5 to 40 years
Farmingdale - Tinton Falls	NJ			1,097		5,618		320		1,097		5,938		7,035		425	2004		6/18/2014		5 to 40 years
Lakewood - Route 70	NJ			626		4,549		188		626		4,737		5,363		316	2003		6/18/2014		5 to 40 years
Matawan - Highway 34	NJ			1,512		9,707		724		1,512		10,431		11,943		668	2005		7/10/2014		5 to 40 years
St. Petersburg - Gandy	FL			2,958		6,904		217		2,958		7,121		10,079		446	2007		8/28/2014		5 to 40 years
Chesapeake - Campostella	VA			2,349		3,875		282		2,349		4,157		6,506		272	2000		9/5/2014		5 to 40 years
San Antonio-Castle Hills	TX			2,658		8,190		415		4,544		6,719		11,263		424	2002		9/10/2014		5 to 40 years
Chattanooga - Broad St	TN			759		5,608		181		759		5,789		6,548		366	2014		9/18/2014		5 to 40 years
New Orleans-Kenner	LA			5,771		10,375		427		5,771		10,802		16,573		652	2008		10/10/2014		5 to 40 years
Orlando-Celebration	FL			6,091		4,641		356		6,091		4,997		11,088		297	2006		10/21/2014		5 to 40 years
Austin-Cedar Park	TX			4,196		8,374		547		4,196		8,921		13,117		510	2003		10/28/2014		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Pulaski	IL			889		4,700		624		889		5,324		6,213		293	2014		11/14/2014		5 to 40 years
Houston - Gessner	TX			1,599		5,813		508		1,599		6,321		7,920		343	2006		12/18/2014		5 to 40 years
New England - Danbury	CT			9,747		18,374		80		9,747		18,454		28,201		892	1999		2/2/2015		5 to 40 years
New England - Milford	CT			9,642		23,352		117		9,642		23,469		33,111		1,139	1999		2/2/2015		5 to 40 years
Long Island - Hicksville	NY			5,153		27,401		158		5,153		27,559		32,712		1,392	2002		2/2/2015		5 to 40 years
Long Island - Farmingdale	NY			4,931		20,415		94		4,931		20,509		25,440		994	2000		2/2/2015		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Alsip	IL			2,579		4,066		84		2,579		4,150		6,729		204	1986		2/5/2015		5 to 40 years
Chicago - N. Pulaski	IL			1,719		6,971		372		1,719		7,343		9,062		344	2015		3/9/2015		5 to 40 years
Fort Myers - Tamiami Trail	FL			1,793		4,382		158		1,793		4,540		6,333		234	2004		4/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Allen	TX			3,864		4,777		224		3,864		5,001		8,865		226	2002		4/16/2015		5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - Beach Blvd.	FL			2,118		6,501		67		2,118		6,568		8,686		312	2013		4/21/2015		5 to 40 years
Space Coast - Vero Beach	FL			1,169		4,409		324		1,169		4,733		5,902		204	1997		5/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Port St. Lucie - Federal Hwy	FL			4,957		6,045		201		4,957		6,246		11,203		293	2001		5/1/2015		5 to 40 years
West Palm - N. Military	FL			3,372		4,206		134		3,372		4,340		7,712		216	1985		5/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers - Bonita Springs	FL			2,687		5,012		212		2,687		5,224		7,911		250	2000		5/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Phoenix - Tatum Blvd.	AZ			852		7,052		159		852		7,211		8,063		302	2015		6/16/2015		5 to 40 years
Boston - Lynn	MA			2,110		8,182		79		2,110		8,261		10,371		379	2015		6/16/2015		5 to 40 years
Syracuse - Ainsely Dr.	NY			2,711		3,795		109		2,711		3,904		6,615		171	2000		8/25/2015		5 to 40 years

Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period
Description
ST Encum
brance Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Land Building,
Equipment
and
Impvmts Total Accum.
Deprec. Date of
Const. Date
Acquired Life on
which depr
in latest
income
statement
is computed
Houston-Katy Freeway
TX 1,049    5,175    501    1,049    5,676    6,725    486    1999 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Houston-Webster
TX 2,127    2,054    2,138    368    2,054    2,506    4,560    229    1982 9/22/2011    5 to 40 years
Newport News-Brick Kiln
VA 2,848    5,892    60    2,848    5,952    8,800    527    2004 9/29/2011    5 to 40 years
Pensacola
FL 197    4,281    158    197    4,439    4,636    372    1996 11/15/2011    5 to 40 years
Miami
FL 2,960    12,077    91    2,960    12,168    15,128    796    2005 5/16/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - Lake Forest
IL 1,932    11,606    79    1,932    11,685    13,617    770    1996/2004 6/6/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - Schaumburg
IL 1,940    4,880    205    1,940    5,085    7,025    346    1998 6/6/2012    5 to 40 years
Norfolk - East Little Creek
VA 911    5,862    47    911    5,909    6,820    393    2007 6/20/2012    5 to 40 years
Atlanta
GA 1,560    6,766    53    1,560    6,819    8,379    443    2009 7/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - Middleburg
FL 664    5,719    26    644    5,765    6,409    343    2008 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Jacksonville - Orange Park
FL 772    3,882    66    772    3,948    4,720    240    2007 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
St. Augustine
FL 739    3,858    53    739    3,911    4,650    242    2007 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Atlanta - NE Expressway
GA 1,384    9,266    46    1,384    9,312    10,696    554    2009 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Kennesaw
GA 856    4,315    46    856    4,361    5,217    263    2008 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Lawrenceville
GA 855    3,838    76    855    3,914    4,769    238    2007 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Atlanta - Woodstock
GA 1,342    4,692    69    1,342    4,761    6,103    291    2009 9/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Raleigh-Durham
NC 2,337    4,901    115    2,337    5,016    7,353    299    2002 9/19/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - Lindenhurst
IL 1,213    3,129    89    1,213    3,218    4,431    199    1999/2006 9/27/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - Orland Park
IL 1,050    5,894    81    1,050    5,975    7,025    331    2007 12/10/2012    5 to 40 years
Bradenton
FL 1,501    3,775    38    1,501    3,813    5,314    199    1997 12/21/2012    5 to 40 years
Ft. Myers - Cleveland Ave.
FL 515    2,280    56    515    2,336    2,851    126    1998 12/21/2012    5 to 40 years
Clearwater - Drew St.
FL 1,234    4,018    37    1,234    4,055    5,289    211    2000 12/21/2012    5 to 40 years
Clearwater - North Myrtle
FL 1,555    5,978    38    1,555    6,016    7,571    313    2000 12/21/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - Aurora
IL 269    3,126    81    269    3,207    3,476    166    2010 12/31/2012    5 to 40 years
Phoenix
AZ 910    3,656    73    910    3,729    4,639    206    2008 12/18/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - North Austin
IL 2,593    5,029    144    2,593    5,173    7,766    272    2005 12/20/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - North Western
IL 1,718    6,466    295    1,718    6,761    8,479    339    2005 12/20/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - West Pershing
IL 395    3,226    68    395    3,294    3,689    168    2008 12/20/2012    5 to 40 years
Austin-Cedar Park
TX 1,246    5,740    54    1,246    5,794    7,040    306    2006 12/27/2012    5 to 40 years
Chicago - North Broadway
IL 2,373    9,869    24    2,373    9,893    12,266    505    2011 12/20/2012    5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock
TX 774    3,327    61    774    3,388    4,162    177    2004 12/27/2012    5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock
TX 632    1,985    54    632    2,039    2,671    121    2007 12/27/2012    5 to 40 years
San Antonio - Marbach
TX 337    2,005    144    337    2,149    2,486    112    2005 2/11/2013    5 to 40 years
Long Island - Lindenhurst
NY 2,122    8,735    102    2,122    8,837    10,959    401    2002 3/22/2013    5 to 40 years
Boston - Somerville
MA 1,553    7,186    62    1,553    7,248    8,801    328    2008 3/22/2013    5 to 40 years
Long Island - Deer Park
NY 1,096    8,276    90    1,096    8,366    9,462    291    2009 8/29/2013    5 to 40 years
Long Island - Amityville
NY 2,224    10,102    69    2,224    10,171    12,395    352    2009 8/29/2013    5 to 40 years
Colorado Springs - Scarlet
CO 629    5,201    135    629    5,336    5,965    170    2006 9/30/2013    5 to 40 years
Toms River - Route 37 W
NJ 1,843    6,544    92    1,843    6,636    8,479    185    2007 11/26/2013    5 to 40 years
Lake Worth - S Military
FL 868    5,306    80    868    5,386    6,254    151    2000 12/4/2013    5 to 40 years
Austin-Round Rock
TX 1,547    5,226    33    1,547    5,259    6,806    145    2008 12/27/2013    5 to 40 years
Hartford-Bristol
CT 1,174    8,816    65    1,174    8,881    10,055    225    2004 12/30/2013    5 to 40 years
Piscataway - New Brunswick
NJ 1,639    10,946    52    1,639    10,998    12,637    277    2006 12/30/2013    5 to 40 years
Fort Lauderdale - 3rd Ave
FL 7,629    11,918    159    7,629    12,077    19,706    307    1998 1/9/2014    5 to 40 years
West Palm - Mercer
FL 15,680    17,520    396    15,680    17,916    33,596    461    2000 1/9/2014    5 to 40 years
Austin - Manchaca
TX 3,999    4,297    592    3,999    4,889    8,888    127    1998/2002 1/17/2014    5 to 40 years


				Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum				Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance		Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Syracuse - Cicero	NY				668		1,957		80		668		2,037		2,705		82	2002		8/25/2015		5 to 40 years
Syracuse - Camillus	NY				473		5,368		85		473		5,453		5,926		210	2005/2011		8/25/2015		5 to 40 years
Syracuse - Manlius	NY				834		1,705		45		834		1,750		2,584		64	2000		8/25/2015		5 to 40 years
Charlotte - Brookshire Blvd.	NC				718		2,977		805		718		3,782		4,500		150	2000		9/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Charleston III	SC				7,604		9,086		169		7,604		9,255		16,859		322	2005		9/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Myrtle Beach II	SC				2,511		6,147		219		2,511		6,366		8,877		253	1999		9/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Columbia VI	SC				3,640		3,452		64		3,640		3,516		7,156		153	2004/2008		9/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Hilton Head - Bluffton	SC				3,084		3,192		89		3,084		3,281		6,365		127	1998		9/1/2015		5 to 40 years
Philadelphia - Eagleville	PA				1,926		4,498		97		1,926		4,595		6,521		150	2010		12/30/2015		5 to 40 years
Orlando - University	FL				882		5,756		241		882		5,997		6,879		150	2001		1/6/2016		5 to 40 years
Orlando - N. Powers	FL				2,567		2,838		51		2,567		2,889		5,456		77	1997		1/6/2016		5 to 40 years
Sarasota - North Port	FL				4,884		10,014		109		4,884		10,123		15,007		116	2001/2006		1/6/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles – Commercial	CA				6,512		12,352		327		6,512		12,679		19,191		319	2004		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - E. Slauson	CA				3,998		13,547		220		3,998		13,767		17,765		323	2012		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Westminster	CA				4,636		14,826		107		4,636		14,933		19,569		347	2006		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Calabasas	CA				13,274		10,419		333		13,274		10,752		24,026		267	2004/2014		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Portsmouth - Kingston	NH				1,713		2,709		29		1,713		2,738		4,451		67	2003		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Portsmouth - Danville	NH				1,615		3,333		36		1,615		3,369		4,984		95	2003		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Portsmouth - Hampton Falls	NH				2,445		6,295		23		2,445		6,318		8,763		160	2005		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Portsmouth - Lee	NH				3,078		2,861		38		3,078		2,899		5,977		70	2000		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Portsmouth - Heritage	NH				4,430		26,040		46		4,430		26,086		30,516		606	1985/1999		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Boston - Salisbury	MA				4,880		6,342		71		4,880		6,413		11,293		182	2003		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Frisco	TX				6,191		5,088		140		6,191		5,228		11,419		128	2003		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - McKinney	TX				8,097		7,047		62		8,097		7,109		15,206		174	2003		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - McKinney	TX				5,508		6,462		61		5,508		6,523		12,031		156	2002		1/21/2016		5 to 40 years
Phoenix - 48th	AZ				988		8,224		40		988		8,264		9,252		201	2015		2/1/2016		5 to 40 years
Miami	FL				2,294		8,980		131		2,294		9,111		11,405		222	2016		2/12/2016		5 to 40 years
Philadelphia - Glenolden	PA				1,768		3,879		78		1,768		3,957		5,725		98	1970		2/17/2016		5 to 40 years
Denver - Thornton	CO				4,528		7,915		85		4,528		8,000		12,528		175	2011		2/29/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Costa Mesa	CA				17,976		25,145		372		17,976		25,517		43,493		491	2005		3/16/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Irving	CA				0		6,318		211		0		6,529		6,529		264	1985		3/16/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Durante	CA				4,671		13,908		80		4,671		13,988		18,659		269	2015		3/16/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Wildomar	CA				6,728		10,340		186		6,728		10,526		17,254		210	2005		3/17/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Torrance	CA				17,445		18,839		402		17,445		19,241		36,686		370	2003		4/11/2016		5 to 40 years
New Haven - Wallingford	CT				3,618		5,286		181		3,618		5,467		9,085		104	2000		4/14/2016		5 to 40 years
New Haven - Waterbury	CT				2,524		5,618		74		2,524		5,692		8,216		109	2001		4/14/2016		5 to 40 years
New York - Mahopac	NY		4,207		2,373		5,089		161		2,373		5,250		7,623		87	1991/1944		4/26/2016		5 to 40 years
New York - Mount Vernon	NY				3,337		13,112		75		3,337		13,187		16,524		226	2013		4/26/2016		5 to 40 years
Pt. St. Lucie	FL		4,002		4,140		7,176		232		4,140		7,408		11,548		161	2002		5/2/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Lewisville	TX				2,333		8,302		122		2,333		8,424		10,757		149	2007		5/5/2016		5 to 40 years
Buffalo - Cayuga	NY				499		5,198		106		499		5,304		5,803		80	2006		5/19/2016		5 to 40 years
Buffalo - Lackawanna	NY				215		2,323		240		215		2,563		2,778		38	2006		5/19/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - S. Congress	TX				1,030		8,163		83		1,030		8,246		9,276		106	1984		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - W Braker	TX				1,210		14,833		53		1,210		14,886		16,096		189	2003		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - Highway 290	TX				930		12,269		46		930		12,315		13,245		159	1999		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - Killeen	TX				3,070		20,782		111		3,070		20,893		23,963		282	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - Round Rock	TX				830		6,129		44		830		6,173		7,003		80	1986		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - Georgetown	TX				1,530		10,647		54		1,530		10,701		12,231		145	2001/2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - Pflugerville	TX				750		9,238		49		750		9,287		10,037		120	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Algonquin	IL				1,430		14,958		26		1,430		14,984		16,414		193	2006		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Carpentersville	IL				350		4,710		14		350		4,724		5,074		61	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - W. Addison	IL				2,770		25,112		85		2,770		25,197		27,967		319	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - State St.	IL				1,190		19,159		40		1,190		19,199		20,389		241	2009		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago-W. Grand	IL				1,720		10,628		58		1,720		10,686		12,406		134	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Libertyville	IL				3,670		26,660		126		3,670		26,786		30,456		338	2009		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Aurora	IL				1,090		20,033		49		1,090		20,082		21,172		257	2009		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Morton Grove	IL				1,610		14,914		40		1,610		14,954		16,564		189	2009		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Bridgeview	IL				3,770		19,990		74		3,770		20,064		23,834		262	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Addison	IL				1,340		11,881		33		1,340		11,914		13,254		153	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - W Diversey	IL				1,670		10,811		24		1,670		10,835		12,505		136	2010		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Elmhurst	IL				670		18,729		20		670		18,749		19,419		236	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Elgin	IL				1,130		12,584		71		1,130		12,655		13,785		162	2003		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - N. Paulina St.,	IL				5,600		12,721		24		5,600		12,745		18,345		162	2006		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years


			Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period											Life on which depreciation
		Encum			Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of	Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST	brance	Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.	Acquired		is completed
Chicago - Matteson	IL			1,590		12,053		32		1,590		12,085		13,675		161	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - S. Heights	IL			1,050		4,960		45		1,050		5,005		6,055		68	2006		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - W. Grand	IL			1,780		8,928		80		1,780		9,008		10,788		113	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - W 30th St	IL			600		15,574		47		600		15,621		16,221		197	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Mokena	IL			3,230		18,623		195		3,230		18,818		22,048		243	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Barrington	IL			1,890		9,395		65		1,890		9,460		11,350		123	2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Naperville	IL			2,620		11,933		62		2,620		11,995		14,615		160	2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Forest Park	IL			1,100		10,087		35		1,100		10,122		11,222		130	2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - La Grange	IL			960		13,019		28		960		13,047		14,007		167	2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Glenview	IL			3,210		8,519		35		3,210		8,554		11,764		114	2014/2015		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Richardson	TX			630		10,282		43		630		10,325		10,955		136	2001		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Arlington	TX			790		12,785		44		790		12,829		13,619		164	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Plano	TX			1,370		10,166		34		1,370		10,200		11,570		130	1998		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - Mesquite	TX			620		8,771		32		620		8,803		9,423		113	2016		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Dallas - S Good Latimer	TX			4,030		8,029		64		4,030		8,093		12,123		104	2016		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Boulder - Arapahoe	CO			3,690		12,074		28		3,690		12,102		15,792		158	1992		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Boulder - Odell	CO			2,650		15,304		30		2,650		15,334		17,984		201	1998		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Boulder - Arapahoe	CO			11,540		15,571		34		11,540		15,605		27,145		204	1984		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Boulder - Broadway	CO			2,670		5,623		42		2,670		5,665		8,335		75	1992		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Houston - Westpark	TX			2,760		8,288		96		2,760		8,384		11,144		110	1996		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Houston - C. Jester	TX			8,080		10,114		96		8,080		10,210		18,290		132	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Houston - Bay Pointe	TX			1,960		9,585		65		1,960		9,650		11,610		125	1972		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Houston - FM 529	TX			680		3,951		48		680		3,999		4,679		53	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Houston - Jones	TX			1,260		2,382		44		1,260		2,426		3,686		35	1994		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Jackson - Flowood	MS			680		20,066		36		680		20,102		20,782		260	2000		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Spencer	NV			1,020		25,152		16		1,020		25,168		26,188		320	2000		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Maule	NV			2,510		11,822		15		2,510		11,837		14,347		151	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Wigwam	NV			590		16,838		3		590		16,841		17,431		212	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Stufflebeam	NV			350		6,977		86		350		7,063		7,413		91	1996		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Ft. Apache	NV			1,470		11,047		15		1,470		11,062		12,532		144	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - North	NV			390		7,042		20		390		7,062		7,452		91	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Warm Springs	NV			1,340		5,141		51		1,340		5,192		6,532		83	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Conestoga	NV			1,420		10,295		21		1,420		10,316		11,736		138	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Warm Springs	NV			1,080		16,436		15		1,080		16,451		17,531		209	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Nellis	NV			790		5,233		7		790		5,240		6,030		73	1995		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Cheyenne	NV			1,470		17,366		17		1,470		17,383		18,853		231	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Dean Martin	NV			3,050		23,333		6		3,050		23,339		26,389		327	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Flamingo	NV			980		13,451		23		980		13,474		14,454		171	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - North	NV			330		15,651		19		330		15,670		16,000		199	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Henderson	NV			570		12,676		37		570		12,713		13,283		167	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - North	NV			520		10,105		6		520		10,111		10,631		132	2002		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Las Vegas - Farm	NV			1,510		9,388		13		1,510		9,401		10,911		121	2008		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Torrance	CA			5,250		32,363		61		5,250		32,424		37,674		412	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Irvine	CA			2,520		18,402		134		2,520		18,536		21,056		234	2002		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Los Angeles - Palm Desert	CA			2,660		16,589		69		2,660		16,658		19,318		216	2002		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Milwaukee - Green Bay	WI			750		14,720		3		750		14,723		15,473		189	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Orlando - Winter Garden	FL			640		6,688		38		640		6,726		7,366		87	2006		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Orlando - Longwood	FL			1,230		9,586		27		1,230		9,613		10,843		123	2000		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Orlando - Overland	FL			1,080		3,713		29		1,080		3,742		4,822		49	2000		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Calvine	CA			2,280		17,069		20		2,280		17,089		19,369		220	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Folsom	CA			1,200		22,150		16		1,200		22,166		23,366		279	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Pell	CA			540		8,874		12		540		8,886		9,426		115	2004		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Goldenland	CA			2,010		8,944		10		2,010		8,954		10,964		122	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Woodland	CA			860		10,569		18		860		10,587		11,447		135	2003		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - El Camino	CA			1,450		12,239		7		1,450		12,246		13,696		158	2002		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Bayou	CA			1,640		21,603		10		1,640		21,613		23,253		277	2005		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Calvine	CA			2,120		24,650		7		2,120		24,657		26,777		318	2003		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - El Dorado	CA			1,610		24,829		13		1,610		24,842		26,452		319	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Sacramento - Fruitridge	CA			1,480		15,695		126		1,480		15,821		17,301		207	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Salt Lake City - W. Jordan	UT			780		12,301		-88		780		12,213		12,993		154	2007		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
San Antonio - US 281	TX			1,380		8,457		57		1,380		8,514		9,894		108	2003		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Austin - San Marcos	TX			990		7,323		48		990		7,371		8,361		96	2016		7/15/2016		5 to 40 years
Charleston	SC			920		7,700		25		920		7,725		8,645		87	2016		7/29/2016		5 to 40 years

   December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Cost:

Balance at beginning of period
   $ 1,864,637 $ 1,742,354 $ 1,525,283
Additions during period:

Acquisitions through foreclosure
   $ —      $ —      $ —
Other acquisitions
   286,691    93,376    185,431
Improvements, etc
   35,097    33,811    36,238


321,788 127,187 221,669
Deductions during period:
Cost of assets disposed
(8,442 ) (4,904 ) (4,598 )
Impairment write-down
—      —      —
Casualty loss
—      —      —
(8,442 ) (4,904 ) (4,598 )


Balance at close of period
$ 2,177,983 $ 1,864,637 $ 1,742,354


Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at beginning of period
$ 366,472 $ 324,963 $ 289,082
Additions during period:
Depreciation expense
$ 47,656    $ 41,929    $ 37,226


47,656 41,929 37,226
Deductions during period:
Accumulated depreciation of assets disposed
(2,427 ) (420 ) (1,345 )
Accumulated depreciation on impaired asset
—      —      —
Accumulated depreciation on casualty loss
—      —      —
(2,427 ) (420 ) (1,345 )


Balance at close of period
$ 411,701    $ 366,472    $ 324,963


					Initial Cost to Company				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition		Gross Amount at Which Carried at Close of Period												Life on which depreciation
			Encum				Building, Equipment and		Building, Equipment and				Building, Equipment and				Accum.		Date of		Date		in latest income statement
Description	ST		brance		Land		Impvmts.		Impvmts.		Land		Impvmts.		Total		Deprec.		Const.		Acquired		is completed
Denver - Westminster		CO				5,062		3,679		172		5,062		3,851		8,913		40		2000		8/4/2016		5 to 40 years
Chicago - Arlington Hgts		IL				370		8,513		3		370		8,516		8,886		18		2016		11/17/2016		5 to 40 years
Orlando - Curry Ford		FL		2,966		3,268		6,378		23		3,268		6,401		9,669		13		2016		12/20/2016		5 to 40 years
Construction in Progress						0		0		14,524		0		14,524		14,524		0		2015
Corporate Office		NY				0		68		33,969		1,633		32,404		34,037		17,651		2000		5/1/2000		5 to 40 years

			$	13,027	$	772,601	$	2,965,619	$	505,088	$	786,764	$	3,456,544	$	4,243,308	$	535,704

The aggregate cost of real estate for U.S. federal income tax purposes is $4,326,173.


Title of Securities		Exchanges on which Registered
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value		New York Stock Exchange


Life Storage, Inc.:	Large accelerated filer	x ☒	Accelerated filer ☐	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨ ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
Life Storage LP:	¨Large accelerated filer ☒	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐


Part I
	Item 1. Business			35
	Item 1A. Risk Factors			1012
	Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			1619
	Item 2. Properties			1720
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings			1821
	Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			1821

	Part II
	Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			1922
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data			2224
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			2327
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			3842
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			3943
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			6681
	Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			6681
	Item 9B. Other Information			6885

	Part III
	Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			6885
	Item 11. Executive Compensation			6885
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			6885
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			6885
	Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			6885

	Part IV
	Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules			6885
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary		91

SIGNATURES		74	92

EX-10.1
EX-10.5
EX-10.8
EX-10.11
EX-12.1
EX-21.1
EX-23.1
EX-23.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101


~~History of Dividends Declared on Common Stock~~
January ~~2013~~2015	$~~0.480~~	0.750 per share
April ~~2013~~2015	$~~0.480~~	0.750 per share
July ~~2013~~2015	$~~0.530~~	0.850 per share
October ~~2013~~2015	$~~0.530~~	0.850 per share

January ~~2014~~2016	$~~0.680~~	0.850 per share
April ~~2014~~2016	$~~0.680~~	0.950 per share
July ~~2014~~2016	$~~0.680~~	0.950 per share
October ~~2014~~2016	$~~0.680~~	0.950 per share


	2014		2013		Change
Same store move ins		159,274		166,116		(6,842	)
Same store move outs		155,914		158,305		(2,391	)

Difference		3,360		7,811		(4,451	)


Life Storage, Inc.		Yes ☒ No ☐
Life Storage LP		Yes ☒ No ☐


Life Storage, Inc.		Yes ☐ No ☒
Life Storage LP		Yes ☐ No ☒


	At or For Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per unit data)	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
Operating Data
Operating revenues	$	462,608		$	366,602		$	326,080		$	273,507		$	234,082
Income from continuing operations		84,956			113,077			89,057			71,472			48,121
Income from discontinued operations (1)		—			—			—			3,123			7,520
Net income		84,956			113,077			89,057			74,595			55,641
Net income attributable to common unitholders		85,225			112,524			88,531			74,126			55,128
Income from continuing operations per common unit attributable to common unitholders – diluted		1.96			3.16			2.67			2.26			1.61
Net income per common unit attributable to common unitholders – basic		1.97			3.18			2.68			2.37			1.88
Net income per common unit attributable to common unitholders – diluted		1.96			3.16			2.67			2.36			1.87
Distributions declared per common unit (2)		3.70			3.20			2.72			2.02			1.80
Balance Sheet Data
Investment in storage facilities at cost	$	4,243,308		$	2,491,702		$	2,177,983		$	1,864,637		$	1,742,354
Total assets		3,857,984			2,118,822			1,850,727			1,558,894			1,480,880
Total debt		1,653,552			827,643			797,054			623,273			680,821
Total liabilities		1,751,399			898,336			861,236			675,245			739,480
Other Data
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	225,550		$	186,198		$	146,068		$	120,646		$	98,762
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,796,069	)		(328,689	)		(334,993	)		(114,345	)		(175,664	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,587,184			140,968			187,944			(4,032	)		76,836


	For Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	88,531		$	74,126		$	55,128		$	30,592		$	40,642
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		526			469			513			937			1,899
Depreciation of real estate and amortization of intangible assets exclusive of deferred financing fees		50,827			44,369			40,153			34,835			31,218
Depreciation of real estate included in discontinued operations		—			313			1,137			1,742			1,938
Depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures		1,666			1,496			1,595			1,018			788
Casualty and impairment loss		—			—			—			1,173			—
Gain on sale of real estate		(5,176	)		(2,852	)		(5,185	)		(1,511	)		(6,944	)
Funds from operations allocable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership		(806	)		(742	)		(881	)		(812	)		(885	)
Funds from operations allocable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures		—			—			—			(567	)		(1,360	)

Funds from operations available to common shareholders	$	135,568		$	117,179		$	92,460		$	67,407		$	67,296


	December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except unit data)	2016			2015
Assets
Investment in storage facilities:
Land	$	786,764		$	480,176
Building, equipment, and construction in progress		3,456,544			2,011,526

		4,243,308			2,491,702
Less: accumulated depreciation		(535,704	)		(465,195	)

Investment in storage facilities, net		3,707,604			2,026,507
Cash and cash equivalents		23,685			7,020
Accounts receivable		5,469			6,805
Receivable from unconsolidated joint ventures		1,223			929
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		67,300			62,520
Prepaid expenses		6,649			5,431
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		—			550
Trade name		16,500			—
Other assets		29,554			9,060

Total Assets	$	3,857,984		$	2,118,822

Liabilities
Line of credit	$	253,000		$	79,000
Term notes, net		1,387,525			746,650
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		75,132			47,839
Deferred revenue		9,700			7,511
Fair value of interest rate swap agreements		13,015			15,343
Mortgages payable		13,027			1,993

Total Liabilities		1,751,399			898,336
Limited partners’ redeemable capital interest at redemption value (217,481 and 168,866 units outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)		18,091			18,171
Partners’ Capital
General partner (466,721 and 368,795 units outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)		21,065			12,205
Limited partners (45,987,885 and 36,341,878 units outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)		2,088,904			1,204,525
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(21,475	)		(14,415	)

Total Controlling Partners’ Capital		2,088,494			1,202,315
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary		—			—

Total Partners’ Capital		2,088,494			1,202,315

Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital	$	3,857,984		$	2,118,822


(dollars in thousands)	Life Storage Holdings, Inc. General Partner			Life Storage, Inc. Limited Partner			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Total Controlling Partners’ Capital
Balance January 1, 2014	$	8,836		$	868,275		$	(6,402	)	$	870,709
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units		1,014			97,967			—			98,981
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units through Dividend Reinvestment Plan		124			12,325			—			12,449
Exercise of stock options		13			1,232			—			1,245
Earned portion of non-vested stock		46			4,510			—			4,556
Stock option expense		2			221			—			223
Deferred compensation outside directors		1			120			—			121
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest		(60	)		(510	)		—			(570	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—			(3,738	)		—			(3,738	)
Net income attributable to common unitholders		891			87,640			—			88,531
Change in fair value of derivatives		(66	)		66			(6,603	)		(6,603	)
Distributions		(906	)		(89,129	)		—			(90,035	)

Balance December 31, 2014		9,895			978,979			(13,005	)		975,869
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units		2,123			208,019			—			210,142
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units through Dividend Reinvestment Plan		139			13,787			—			13,926
Exercise of stock options		16			1,617			—			1,633
Earned portion of non-vested stock		63			6,191			—			6,254
Stock option expense		2			208			—			210
Deferred compensation outside directors		—			59			—			59
Carrying value less than redemption value on redeemed noncontrolling interest		(10	)		(70	)		—			(80	)
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—			(3,328	)		—			(3,328	)
Net income attributable to common unitholders		1,131			111,393			—			112,524
Change in fair value of derivatives		(14	)		14			(1,410	)		(1,410	)
Distributions		(1,140	)		(112,344	)		—			(113,484	)

Balance December 31, 2015		12,205			1,204,525			(14,415	)		1,202,315
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units		9,349			925,614			—			934,963
Net proceeds from the issuance of Partnership Units through Dividend Reinvestment Plan		132			13,034			—			13,166
Conversion of operating partnership units to common shares		—			4,795			—			4,795
Issuance of operating partnership units		95			(95	)		—			—
Earned portion of non-vested stock		72			7,144			—			7,216
Stock option expense		1			88			—			89
Deferred compensation outside directors		1			91			—			92
Adjustment to redemption value of noncontrolling redeemable Operating Partnership Units		—			4,457			—			4,457
Net income attributable to common unitholders		856			84,369			—			85,225
Amortization of terminated hedge included in AOCI		4			(4	)		458			458
Change in fair value of derivatives		(75	)		75			(7,518	)		(7,518	)
Dividends		(1,575	)		(155,189	)		—			(156,764	)

Balance December 31, 2016	$	21,065		$	2,088,904		$	(21,475	)	$	2,088,494


	Weighted Average			Range
Expected life (years)		4.50		4.50
Risk free interest rate		1.63	%	1.57% - 1.71%
Expected volatility		22.77	%	22.60% - 22.90%
Expected dividend yield		3.58	%	3.58%
Fair value	$	10.04		$10.02 - $10.06


	Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	2016		2015		2014
Numerator:
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	85,225	$	112,524	$	88,531
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares		43,184		35,379		33,019
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options and non-vested stock		223		222		172

Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversion		43,407		35,601		33,191
Basic Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders	$	1.97	$	3.18	$	2.68
Diluted Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders	$	1.96	$	3.16	$	2.67


	Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per unit data)	2016		2015		2014
Numerator:
Net income attributable to common unitholders	$	85,225	$	112,524	$	88,531
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per unit - weighted average units		43,184		35,379		33,019
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options and non-vested stock		223		222		172

Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average units and assumed conversion		43,407		35,601		33,191
Basic Earnings per common unit attributable to common unitholders	$	1.97	$	3.18	$	2.68
Diluted Earnings per common unit attributable to common unitholders	$	1.96	$	3.16	$	2.67


							Consideration paid							Acquisition Date Fair Value
(dollars in thousands) State	Number of Properties		Date of Acquisition		Purchase Price		Cash Paid		Value of Operating Partnership Units Issued		Net Other Liabilities (Assets) Assumed			Land		Building, Equipment, and Improvements		In-Place Customer Leases		Closing Costs Expensed
2014
Florida		2		1/9/2014	$	54,000	$	53,599	$	—	$	401		$	23,309	$	29,867	$	824	$	1,674
Texas		1		1/17/2014		9,000		8,962		—		38			3,999		4,856		145		216
Texas		1		2/10/2014		8,900		8,857		—		43			2,235		6,564		101		204
Maine		2		2/11/2014		14,750		14,602		—		148			2,639		11,824		287		409
Illinois		1		3/31/2014		8,700		8,582		—		118			1,837		6,724		139		224
Illinois		1		5/5/2014		5,500		5,487		—		13			598		4,902		—		45
Texas		1		5/13/2014		6,075		6,017		—		58			2,000		3,935		140		181
Missouri		7		5/22/2014		35,050		34,786		—		264			9,420		24,835		795		622
New Jersey		1		6/5/2014		12,600		12,526		—		74			5,161		7,201		238		281
New York		1		6/11/2014		8,000		7,988		—		12			1,741		6,106		153		202
New Jersey		1		6/12/2014		2,500		2,431		—		69			—		2,319		181		64
Georgia		1		6/12/2014		7,700		7,616		—		84			2,263		5,293		144		179
New Jersey		3		6/18/2014		18,325		18,221		—		104			2,543		15,377		405		542
New Jersey		1		7/10/2014		11,590		11,572		—		18			1,512		9,880		198		321
Florida		1		8/28/2014		10,200		10,111		—		89			2,958		7,055		187		184
Virginia		1		9/5/2014		6,400		6,373		—		27			2,349		3,947		104		267
Texas		1		9/10/2014		11,200		11,046		—		154			2,658		8,299		243		196
Tennessee		1		9/18/2014		6,550		6,535		—		15			759		5,749		42		144
Louisiana		1		10/10/2014		16,750		16,630		—		120			5,771		10,697		282		238
Florida		1		10/20/2014		11,250		11,119		—		131			6,091		4,971		188		495
Texas		1		10/28/2014		13,125		13,095		—		30			4,196		8,721		208		267
Illinois		1		11/14/2014		5,750		3,239		2,417		94			889		4,850		11		206
Texas		1		12/18/2014		8,000		7,937		—		63			1,598		6,193		209		197

Total acquired 2014		33			$	291,915	$	287,331	$	2,417	$	2,167		$	86,526	$	200,165	$	5,224	$	7,358

2013
Texas		1		2/11/2013	$	2,400	$	2,382	$	—	$	18		$	337	$	2,005	$	58	$	125
New York		1		3/22/2013		11,050		11,119		—		(69	)		2,122		8,736		192		244
Massachusetts		1		3/22/2013		8,850		8,848		—		2			1,553		7,186		111		141
New York		2		8/29/2013		22,000		21,985		—		15			3,320		18,378		302		466
Colorado		1		9/30/2013		5,940		5,859		—		81			628		5,201		111		167
New Jersey		1		11/26/2013		8,535		8,499		—		36			1,843		6,544		148		249
Florida		1		12/4/2013		6,300		6,231		—		69			868		5,306		126		153
Texas		1		12/27/2013		6,900		6,873		—		27			1,547		5,226		127		337
Connecticut		1		12/30/2013		10,160		10,209		—		(49	)		1,174		8,817		169		196
New Jersey		1		12/30/2013		12,765		12,754		—		11			1,639		10,946		180		359

Total acquired 2013		11			$	94,900	$	94,759	$	—	$	141		$	15,031	$	78,345	$	1,524	$	2,437
Leased stores (CT, NY)		4		11/1/2013		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		692

Total acquired or leased 2013		15			$	94,900	$	94,759	$	—	$	141		$	15,031	$	78,345	$	1,524	$	3,129


	Asset (Liability)			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Interest rate swaps		(13,341	)		—		(13,341	)		—


	Outstanding				Exercisable
Exercise Price Range	Options		Weighted average exercise price		Options		Weighted average exercise price
$23.15 – 29.99		3,500	$	23.15		3,500	$	23.15
$30.00 – 39.99		5,000	$	35.56		5,000	$	35.56
$40.00 – 59.99		87,106	$	44.41		44,816	$	45.16
$60.00 – 76.07		20,000	$	74.17		14,000	$	73.43

Total		115,606	$	48.54		67,316	$	49.18

Intrinsic value of outstanding stock options at December 31, 2014							$	4,472,123
Intrinsic value of exercisable stock options at December 31, 2014							$	2,560,457


	2013 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30		Sept. 30		Dec. 31
Operating revenue (a)	$	63,878	$	67,109	$	70,455	$	72,065
Income from continuing operations (a)		14,204		17,816		19,552		19,900
Income from discontinued operations (a)		168		236		247		2,472
Net Income		14,372		18,052		19,799		22,371
Net income attributable to common shareholders		14,280		17,937		19,675		22,234
Net Income Per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders
Basic	$	0.47	$	0.57	$	0.63	$	0.70
Diluted	$	0.47	$	0.57	$	0.62	$	0.69


	Four Storage Facilities		Building Lease		Corporate Headquarters		Total
2015	$	537	$	48	$	896	$	1,481
2016		—		48		914		962
2017		—		48		924		972
2018		—		48		924		972
2019		—		51		924		975
Thereafter		—		211		3,167		3,378

Total	$	537	$	454	$	7,749	$	8,740


Year ending December 31:
2017	$	2,432
2018		2,332
2019		2,227
2020		2,278
2021		2,288
Thereafter		13,431

Total	$	24,988


State	No. of Properties		Contract Amount		Acquisition Date
Illinois*		1	$	9,800		Feb. 2017
North Carolina*		1		12,425
Texas*		3		44,800

		5	$	67,025


/S/ David L. Rogers		/S/ Andrew J. Gregoire
Chief Executive Officer		Chief Financial Officer


~~/s/ Ernst & Young LLP~~

~~Buffalo, New York~~/S/ David L. Rogers		/S/ Andrew J. Gregoire
~~February 24, 2015~~Chief Executive		Officer Chief Financial Officer


3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 (a) to the ~~Registrant’s~~Parent Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-91422) filed June 19, 1995).

3.2		Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company classifying and designating the Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~ the Parent Company’s Form 8-A filed December 3, 1996).

3.3		Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company classifying and designating the 9.85% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.6 to ~~Registrant’s~~ the Parent Company’s Form 8-A filed July 29, 1999).

3.4		Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company classifying and designating the 8.375% Series C Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 12, 2002).

3.5		Articles Supplementary to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company reclassifying shares of Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock into ~~Preferred.~~Preferred Stock. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 31, 2011).

3.6		~~Bylaws, as amended,~~Articles of Amendment of the ~~Registrant~~Parent Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ~~Registrant’s~~the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016).

3.7		Bylaws, as amended, of the Parent Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016).

3.8		Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016).

3.9		Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10 filed April 22, 1998).


February 27, 2017	~~SOVRAN SELF~~LIFE STORAGE, INC.

~~February 24, 2015~~	By:	/s/ Andrew J. Gregoire
		Andrew J. Gregoire Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

February 27, 2017		LIFE STORAGE LP

	By:	/s/ Andrew J. Gregoire
		Andrew J. Gregoire Chief Financial Officer
		~~Secretary~~ (Principal Accounting Officer)


Signature	Title		Date

/s/ Robert J. Attea Robert J. Attea	Executive Chairman ~~of the Board of~~ ~~Directors~~ and Director of Life Storage, Inc. and Life Storage Holdings, Inc., general partner of Life Storage LP		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Robert J. Attea~~	27, 2017

/s/ Kenneth F. Myszka Kenneth F. Myszka	President and Director of Life Storage, Inc. and Life Storage Holdings, Inc., general partner of Life Storage LP		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Kenneth F. Myszka~~			27, 2017

/s/ David L. Rogers David L. Rogers	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Life Storage, Inc. and Life Storage Holdings, Inc., general partner of Life Storage LP		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~David L. Rogers~~		27, 2017

/s/ Andrew J. Gregoire Andrew J. Gregoire	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of Life Storage, Inc. and Life Storage Holdings, Inc., general partner of Life Storage LP		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Andrew J. Gregoire~~	27, 2017

/s/ ~~Anthony P. Gammie~~Charles E. Lannon	~~Director~~		~~February 24, 2015~~
~~Anthony P. Gammie~~

~~/s/~~ Charles E. Lannon	Director of Life Storage, Inc.		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Charles E. Lannon~~			27, 2017

/s/ Stephen R. Rusmisel Stephen R. Rusmisel	Director of Life Storage, Inc.		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Stephen R. Rusmisel~~			27, 2017

/s/ Arthur L. Havener, Jr. Arthur L. Havener, Jr.	Director of Life Storage, Inc.		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Arthur L. Havener, Jr.~~			27, 2017

/s/ Mark. G. Barberio Mark G. Barberio	Director of Life Storage, Inc.		February ~~24, 2015~~
~~Mark G. Barberio~~			27, 2017


	December 31, 2014						December 31, 2013						December 31, 2012
Cost:
Balance at beginning of period				$	1,864,637					$	1,742,354					$	1,525,283
Additions during period:
Acquisitions through foreclosure	$	—					$	—					$	—
Other acquisitions		286,691						93,376						185,431
Improvements, etc		35,097						33,811						36,238

					321,788						127,187						221,669
Deductions during period:
Cost of assets disposed		(8,442	)					(4,904	)					(4,598	)
Impairment write-down		—						—						—
Casualty loss		—						—						—
					(8,442	)					(4,904	)					(4,598	)

Balance at close of period				$	2,177,983					$	1,864,637					$	1,742,354

Accumulated Depreciation:
Balance at beginning of period				$	366,472					$	324,963					$	289,082
Additions during period:
Depreciation expense	$	47,656					$	41,929					$	37,226

					47,656						41,929						37,226
Deductions during period:
Accumulated depreciation of assets disposed		(2,427	)					(420	)					(1,345	)
Accumulated depreciation on impaired asset		—						—						—
Accumulated depreciation on casualty loss		—						—						—
					(2,427	)					(420	)					(1,345	)

Balance at close of period				$	411,701					$	366,472					$	324,963